5759ORDINANCE NO. 5759
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
(RECLASSIFICATION NO. 89-90-58).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES FIND THAT:
WHEREAS, the City Council heretofore held a duly
noticed public hearing and, as a result thereof, did adopt its
Resolution No. 90R-267 determining that a change or changes in
the zone or zones hereinafter mentioned and described should be
made; and
WHEREAS, certain conditions and requirements were made
as conditions precedent to the making of a change or changes of
said zone or zones, which conditions have been complied with.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That the Zoning map referred to in Title 18 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended by
rezoning and reclassifying that certain property situated in the
City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described
as follows, to wit:
AREA 1 - APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES CONSISTING OF
THOSE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST
SIDES OF LOARA STREET BEGINNING AT THE
_.. SOUTHERN CITY LIMITS AND EXTENDING NORTH
APPROXIMATELY 660 FEET; ALSO INCLUDING
THOSE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH
SIDES OF WILMOT LANE. EXCEPTING THE PARCEL
LOCATED ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILMOT
LANE AND LOARA STREET.
AREA 2 - APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES CONSISTING
OF THAT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
EUCLID STREET, HAVING A FRONTAGE OF
APPROXIMATELY 330 FEET, HAVING A MAXIMUM
DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 608 FEET AND BEING
LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 190 FEET SOUTH OF THE
CENTERLINE OF CINDY LANE.
into the "RM -3000" RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE -FAMILY ZONE of the City
of Anaheim.
SECTION 2.
The City Zoning Map shall be, and the same is hereby,
amended and the property above-described shall be excluded from
the zone in which it is now situated and incorporated in and made
a part of the zone or zones as above set forth, and said City
Zoning Map, as amended, is hereby adopted and the Planning
Department is hereby directed to prepare a sectional zoning map
to be added to the City Zoning map showing the changes hereby
approved and adopted.
THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 17th day of April
2001. ���i-�
MA OR OF THE CITY OF NAHEIM
ATTEST:
CITY CLEA OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
38823v.1\March 8, 2001\SMANN
K
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, SHERYLL SCHROEDER, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Ordinance No. 5759 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of
Anaheim, held on the 27th day of March, 2001, and that the same was duly passed and adopted
at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 17th day of April, 2001, by the following vote
of the members thereof:
AYES: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS
NOES: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS
ABSENT: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS
(SEAL)
Feldhaus, Kring, Tait, McCracken, Daly
None
None
411,
CITY CLER OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
y OA_AN4Lw000 11 .�,:�: µN a
i � ►
..
!?
.,..
:
40.
CAT
Reclassification Numoer 89-90-58
o•tesJune 4. 1990
General Plan Amendment No. 308-1E 2
Scali Graphic
initiated By: CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION Q.S. No. 59
Area proposed for reclassificatlon�from the RM -1200 (It `tdentlel.
Multiple -Family) Zone to the RM -2400 (Residential. Multlple-
`'< 4in addition to the proposed General Plan;Aendment.
Family) Zone
` A 28
s
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANIAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 89-90-58 BE GRANTED, AS MODIFIED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did initiate
Reclassification proceedings for certain real property situated in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows:
AREA 1 - APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES CONSISTING OF THOSE
PARCELS LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST SIDES OF LOARA
STREET BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERN CITY LIMITS AND
EXTENDING NORTH APPROXIMATELY 660 FEETt ALSO INCLUDING
THOSE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE NORTH An SOUTH SIDES OF
WILMOT LANE. EXCEPTING THE PARCEL LOCATED ON THE
NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILMOT LANE AND LOARA STREET.
AREA 2 - APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES CONSISTING OF THAT
PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF EUCLID STREET, HAVING
A FRONTAGE OF APPROXIMATELY 330 rEET, HAVING A MAXIMUM
DEPTH OF APPROXIMATELY 608 FEE? AND BEING LOCATED
APPROXIMATELY 190 FEET SOUTH 'OF THE CENTERLINE OF CINDY
LANE.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on June 4, 1990 at 1:30 p.m., notice of
said public hearing having been duly given as required by lav and in accordance
with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and
consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study "de by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all
evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. That the petitioner proposes reclassification of subject
property from the RM -1200 (Residential, Multiple -Family) Zone to the RM -2400
(Residential, Multiple -rami y) or a less intense :one.
2. That the Planning Commission determined at the public hearing
that these properties should be reclassified to the RM -3000 (Residential,
Multiple -Family) Zone rather than to the RM -2400 (Residential, Multiple -Family)
Zone.
3. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject property for
medium density residential land uses (Area 1) and low density residential uses
(Area 2) but that a general plan amendment (No. 308) was recommended for approval
by the Planning Commission to change said residential designations to Low Medium
(Areas 1 and 2).
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is
necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the
comunity.
1472r
Ise
PC90-144
S. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does
properly relate to the sones and their permitted uses locally established in
close proximity to subject property and to the sones and their permitted uses
generally established throughout the community.
6. That one person indicated his presence at said public
hearing in opposition; and that no correspondence was received in opposition
to subject petition.
4RNIA E2iVIR0&_NTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim
City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify property
RM -1200 (Residential, Multiple -Family) Zone to the RM -2400 (Residential,
Multiple -Family) or a less intense zone on property which consists of
Area 1: approximately 7 acres consisting of those parcels located on the
east and west sides of Loara Street beginning at the southern City limits and
extending north approximately 660 feet, also including those parcels located
on the north and south sides of Wilmot Lane, excepting the parcel located on
the northwest corner of Wilmot Lane and Loara Streets and Area 2:
approximately 4.6 acres consisting of that parcel located on the east side of
Euclid Street, having a frontage of approximately 330 feet, having a maximum
depth of approximately 608 feet and being located approximately 190 feet
south of the centerline of Cindy Lane; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declar. ion upon finding that it has considered the Negative Declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning
Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Reclassification, as
modified, and, by so doing, that Title 18 -Zoning of the Anaheim Municipal
Code be amonded to exclude the above-descriTsd properties from the RM -1200
(Residential, Multiple -Family) Zone and to incorporate said described
properties into the RM -3000 (Residential, Multiple -Family) Zone upon the
followin- condition which is hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proposed use of subject properties in order to preserve the safety and
general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim;
1. That introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject properties is
contingent upon City Council approval of General Plan Amendment No. 308,
now pending.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does
hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly
predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions
hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be
declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
S' -a
PC90--144
( THE FORZGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Ca fission meeting
t of June 4, 1990.
(Original signed by Robert Messe)
ACTING CHAIRMAN
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTESTt
{Original signed by Edith L. Harris)
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY Or ORANGE
CITY or ANAHEIM )
I, Edith L. Harris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a
meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held ou June 4, 1990, by the
following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOUAS, FELDHAUS, HELLYER, MC BURNEY, MiESSE
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: BOYDSTUX, HERBST
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day
of _- - - . 1990.
(Original signed by Edith L. Harris)
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING C0MkISS1t,:.
-3-
"'TT jr
PC90-144
15a. CEQA N GATIVL n?f.LAXAjjM
15b. CrlAIRAL__Pi►11 I►MLNDME�T_1i4�_�.44=1._A2tR
15c. UCL&UIIICATI4ii NO, D4-90-5&
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
June 4, 1990
I tsmm No. 15
(Motion Required)
(Resolution Required)
(Resolution Required)
(1) The subject Planninq Couwission-initiated request involves 2
separate areas described as follows and illustrated on Attachment A:
Area 1 - approximately 7 acres consisting of those parcels located
on the east and vest aides of Loara-Street beginning at the southern
City limits and extending north approximately 660 feet: also
including those parcels located on the north and south sides of
Wilmot Lane. Excepting the parcel located on the northwest corner
of Wilmot Lane and Loara Street.
Area 2 - approximately 4.6 acres consisting of that parcel locstod
on the east side of Euclid Street, having a frontage of
approximately 330 .feet. having a maximum depth of approximately 608
feet and being located approximately 190 feet south of the
centerline of Cindy Lane.
(2) The Planning Commission directed staff to initiate a General Plan
Amendment for Study Area 1 redesignating the area from the existing
Medium Density Residential designation to Low -Medium Density
Residential. For Study Area 2, staff was directed to initiate a
redesignation from the existing Low Density Residential designation
to the Low -Medium Density Residential designation.
(3) The Planning Commission further requested staff to initiate
reclassification proceedings for those properties within the Study
Areas currently toned RM -1200 (Residential, Multiple-tanily) to the
RJB( -2400 (Residential, Multiple -family) or a less intense sone.
Please refer to Attachment B for a description of sone designations
and Attachment C for a map detailing the area to be considered for
reclassification.
(4) Last year, the City Council conducted a joint work session with the
Planning Commission to discuss issues regarding multiple -family
residential development in Anaheim. A phased work plan was
developed which included, in part, an analysis of areas designated
as Medius Density Residential on the General Plan as well as those
areas gonad RM -1200 west of State College Boulevard to the western
City limits to determine land use inconsistencies.
JEB:mp:pl Page 1
2916I
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
June 4, 1990
Item No. 15
(5) Staff conducted a detailed analysis of the General Plan designations,
zoning and land uses. Staff identified 29 Quarter Sections and 308
acres in which inconsistencies exist between land uses and the General
Plan designation and/or zoning. Staff's findings and recomrner,dations
wore included in a staff report presented to the Planning Commission
at a Work Session on September 7, 1989.
(6) On September 25, 1989, the Planning Commission formally initiated the
General Plan Amendment/Reclassification proceedings for all study
areas pursuant to Sections 18.03.050.050 and 18.03.050.030 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code; respectively: A series of public hearings
have commenced to consider General Plan Amendments and
reclassification proceedings, as needed, for each study area analyzed.
�YAS�1�A?,I.Q11
(7) Since the adoption of the General Plan in Hove,aber of 1969, the
Planning Commission/City Council have viewed the General Plan as being
flexible within the ranges specified. This is reflected in the
introduction to the General Plan text frorA which the following
statement is quoted:
"The Anaheim General Plan is not a precise plan and does not, show, nor
intend to show, the exact land use pattern which will in fact occur.
Instead, it indicates the genertl location of land uses and the
interrelationships of various land use patterns as shown on the
General Plan Land Use map. The plan constitutes an expression of
current Objectives, Principals, Standards, Proposals and Policies and
provides a basis from •which decisions relating to specific land time
proposals can be made."
(8) Subject General Plan Amendment involves redesignations from the
existing Medium Density Residential designation to the Low -Medium
Density Residential designation and from the Low Density Residential
designation to the Low -Medium Density Residential designation.
(9) The Medium Density Residential designation typically takes the form of
apartment complexes. However, condominiums, townhouses and detached
single-family dwellings not exceeding the maximum density range as
prescribed by the General Plan or zoning, would be permitted. This
designation permits a theoretical maximum of 36 dwelling units per
gross acre and would typically be implemented by the RM -1200
(Residential, Multiple -Family) Zone.
Page 2
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
June 4, 1990
Item No. 15
(10) The Lov-Medium Density Residential designation typically permits
detached single-family dwelling units, apartment complexes (at a
lesser density than the Medium Density Residential designation)
including duplexes or triplexes and condominiums/townhouses not
exceeding the maximum density range as prescribed by the General Plan
or zoning. The Low -Medium Density Pesidential designation is
typically implemented by the RS -5000 (Residential, Single -Family),
RM -3000 (Residential, Multiple -Family) and RM -2400 (Residential,
Multiple -Family) Zones. The Low -Medium Density Residential
designation would permit a theoreticAl maximum of le dwelling units
per gross acre.
(11) The Low Density Residential designation is intended to provide for and
encourage the orderly development of single-family residences on lots
having a minimum lot area of 7,200 square foot. This designation is
typically implemented by the RS -7200 (Residential, Single -Family) and
the RS -10,000 (Residential, Single -Family) Zones. The Low Density
Residential designation permits a theoretical maximum of 6.1 dwelling
units per gross acre.
(12) The following is an analysis of each of the Study Areas in regard to
the status of the area in question as well as the surrounding
properties, land use alternatives, and vehicular access.
ARRA It
At�Tv or.�Ti1PY�81i1�1IS8QIT2�JJ3G j!AQPXRTM
General Plan
Direction Land Us4 j,QnlnQ pesigaatiQa_
Study Area Multiplo-Family RM -1000, Medium Density
Residential and Single- RM -1200, Residential
Family.Residential RS -7200,
RS -5000 and
RS -A-43,000
North Single -Family RS -7200 Low Density
Residential Residential
East Single -Family RS -7200 Low Density
Residential Residential
South (City of Park and Single- ----- -----
Garden Grove) Family Residential
Nest Single -Family RS -7200 Low Density
Residential Residential
*Refer to Attachment A for graphic illustration
Page 3
C
I
1
Staff Report to the
Planniaq Coessission
June 4, 1990
Item go. 15
The following is a comparison of impacts associated with the azisting
General Plan designation and the proposed alternative which has been
prepared for Planning Commission/City Council consideration. Mazimum
dwelling units are based on density ranges permitted for given land use
designations. Average daily traffic trips have been generated based on
city-wide averages for associated land use types.
Typical Density Range Potential Est. Average
Land Use Approx. Imples+en- (Dwelling Units Dwelling Units Daily Traffic
Designation Acreage taL"A_Z.Qns Per Gross Acrel (Avg, to Mac.) Trips .`
Medium 7 RM -1200 0 - 36 190 - 252 1615 - 2142
Density (Based on 8.5
Residential Trips per DU)
At the September 7, 1989 Planning Commission Workshop, the following was
discussed in relation to the Proposed Alternatives
' A Low -Medium Density Residential designation would be consistent
with the density of the existing multi -family uses.
• A Gjw-Medium Density Residential designation would be compatible
with the single-family residences to the north, east and west.
Page 4
Typical
Density Range
Potential
Est.
Average
Land Use Approx.
Designation kcr*aae
Implemen-
tation Zones
(Dwelling Units
Per Grose Acre).
Dwelling Units
(Avg. to Maz.)
Daily
Trips
Traffic
_
Lor -Medium 7
RS -5000
0 - 8.7
47 - 60
634
- 810
Density
(Based
on 13.5
Residential
Trips
per DU)
RM -3000
0 - 14.5
80 - 101
840
- 1060
(Based
on 10.5
Trips
per DU)
RM -2400
0 - is
94 - 126
799
- 1071
(Based
on 8.5
Trips
per DU)
At the September 7, 1989 Planning Commission Workshop, the following was
discussed in relation to the Proposed Alternatives
' A Low -Medium Density Residential designation would be consistent
with the density of the existing multi -family uses.
• A Gjw-Medium Density Residential designation would be compatible
with the single-family residences to the north, east and west.
Page 4
Staff Report to the
Plaaaio9 Coesaission
June 4, 1990
Item No. 15
Vehicular Access:
Primary vehicular
access is provided
via Loara Street
and Della Lana,
both local streets.
STUDY AREA
2
Status of StudX Area
and Surrounding_ProRtrties+:
Direction
(Rand tlse
zoning-
General Plan
Designation
Study Area
Condominiums
RX -1200
Lor Density
Residential
(forth
Multiple -Family
RM -1200
Medium Density
Residential
Residential
East
Single. -Family
RS -7200
Low Density
Residential
Residential
South
Single-ramily
RS -7200
Low Density
Residential
Residential
Ment (City of Single-raially ----- -----
Garden Grove) Residential
*Refer to AttacIviment A for grrpbic illustration
General Plan ColMRarison:
The following in a comparison of impacts associated with the existing
General Plan deniquation wsd the proposed alternative which has been
prepared for tho Planning Commission/City Council consideration. Maximum
dwelling units dire based on density ranges permitted for given land use
designations. average daily traffic trips have been generated based on
city-wide averages for associated land use types.
Page 5
T1 r.. -v _
Staff Report to t
Planning cossaissio
June 4, 1990
I tea
No. 15
Typical Density Range Potential got. Aveage
Implosion -Land Use Approx. Implosion- (Dwelling Units Dwelling Units Daily Tr ffic
Designs ion dCZjL&at tation Zone Per Gross Acrel (Ayy. to M".) T In
Low Density 4.6 RS -101000 0 - 4.4 20 270
Residential (Based oa 13.5
Trips p DU)
RS -7200 0 - 6.1 20 - 28 270 -78
(Based on 13.5
Trips pe DU)
At the September 7, 1989 Planning Commission Workshop the following was
discussed in relation to the proposed alternative:
A Low -Medium Density designation would be consistent with the
existing density and the proposed zoning.
Primary vehicular access is provided via Euclid Street. The
Circulation Element of the General Plan designates Luclid Street as a
Primary Arterial Highway (6 or 4 lane divided/53 foot half -width). The
Study Area is further served by Postoria Street, a local street.
Page 6
Typical
Density Range
Potential
Est. Avefsge
Land Use Approx.
Implomen-
(Dwelling Units
Dwelling Units
Daily Traffic
PQs QJLatiOD &.L"at
LAL"a Zones
..Per- GLOSS Acrfi)
(Avg, to MA , )
21____
Low -Medium 4.6
RS -5000
0 - 8.7
31 - 40
418 •-5401
Density
(Bas*d on 13.5
Residential
Trips per DU)
RM -3000
0 - 14.5
52 - 66
546 - 693
(Based on 10.5
Trips per DU)
RMI -2400
0 - is
62 - 62
527 - 697
(!lased on 8.5
Trips per DU)
At the September 7, 1989 Planning Commission Workshop the following was
discussed in relation to the proposed alternative:
A Low -Medium Density designation would be consistent with the
existing density and the proposed zoning.
Primary vehicular access is provided via Euclid Street. The
Circulation Element of the General Plan designates Luclid Street as a
Primary Arterial Highway (6 or 4 lane divided/53 foot half -width). The
Study Area is further served by Postoria Street, a local street.
Page 6
0
r
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
June 4, 1990
Item No. 15
The Planning Comsission directed staff to initiate reclassification
proceedings for the parcels described in Paragraph no. 3 from the RM -1200
Zone to the RM -2400 or a less intense sone.
(13) Staff has reviewed the proposal and the Initial Study and finds no
significant envirorsmental Impact and, therefore, recommends that a
Negative Declaration be approved upon -a finding by, the Planning
Commission that it has considered the proposed Visgative Declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process
and further finding on the basis of the Initial Study and any
conow nts received that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant affect. on the environment.
RLCL- SSIYIC&TIQfi INTMATIOU:
(14) The Planning Commission directed staff to initiate reclassification
proceedings from the RM, 200 to the RN -2400 Zone or a less intense
sone as described in paragraph No. 3.
(15) Staff recommends that the Planning Commission/City Council determine
if the study areas should continue to have opportunities for
development under the existing Kedium Density Residential and Low
Density Residential desigdations; or, whether the densities should
be amended to reflect the current land uses through redesignation of
the study areas to the Low -►tedium+ Density Residential designation;
and, whether properties toned RM -1200 should be reclassified to the
RM -2400 'Zone.
Page 7
.-� 0"ANQ(w000
AC 7Vi
I 1 LM I
Av[Nut
—
p t_I
Reclassification Numoer 89-90-58 Date: June k. 1990
General Plan /'amendment No. 308 -Ib 2 Scale: Graphic
Initiated By: CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION Q.S. No 59
Area proposed for rec I as s I f I cAt I on from the RM -1200 (Res tentIai,
Multiple -Family) Zone to the RM -2400 (Residential, Multip e -
Family) Zone in addition to the proposed General Plan Amendment.
. _I T" .. _... u.. __
1
RESOLUTION NO. 90R-267 ,
A RESOLUTION OF TNF CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THF
ZONING MAI' REFERRED TO 1N TITLE. 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MIJNICII'Al, CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED ANTI
THAT Till: BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD
BE. CHANGED.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim did hold a public hearing in Reclassification Proceeding
No. 89-90-S8 to consider an amendment to the Zoning Map referredto
in Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and to consider a cha ge
in the boundaries of the zone or zones hereinafter mentioned and
described and, at said hearing, did receive evidence and reports
from persons interested therein and from its staff; and
WHEkFIAS, within a period of forty (40) days following
said hearing, the Planning Commission did duly adopt a resolutioi
containing a report of its findings, a summary of the evidence
presented at said hearing and granted the proposed amendment; ani
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or, the City council, on its own motion, caust
the review of said Planning Commission action; and
WHE:RE:AS, at the time and place fixed for said public
hearing, the City CounciI did duly hold and conduct such hearing
and did give all persons interested therein an opportunity to be
heard and did receive evidence and reports, and did consider the
same; and
I
d
WHEREAS, the City Council does find and determine that
the Zoning Map refer -red to in Title 18 of the Anaheim Mur►icipal
Code should he amended and that the property hereinafter describ d
should he excluded from the zone or zones in which it is now
situated and incorporatrd in the zone and zones as hereinafter s t
forth.
NOW, THEREFOR 11, BE IT RFSOLVE:D by the City Council of he
City of Anaheim that the City Council does hereby declare and
indicate its intention to amend the Zoning Map of the City of
Anaheim and to rezone and reclassify the following described
property, situated in the, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, Stae
of California, to wit:
AREA I - APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES CONSISTING OF THOSE PARCELS
LOCATED ON THE FAST AND WEST SIDES OF LOARA STREET BEGINNIN
AT TETE SOUTHERN CITY LIMITS AND EXTENDING, NORTH APPROXIMATEY
660 FEET; ALSO INCLUDING THOSE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE NORTH
AND SOUTH SIDES OF WILMOT LANE. EXCEPTING THE PARCEL LOCAT D
ON THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILMOT LANE AND LOARA STREET.
RECLASS 89-90-S8
-TT 7—
AREA 2 - APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES CONSISTING OF THAT PAR EL
LOCATED ON THE FAST SIDE OF EUCLID STREET, IIAVING A FRO TAGS
i OF APPROXIMATELY 330 FEET, HAVING A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF
r' APPROXIMATELY 608 FEET AND BEING LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 90
FEET SOUTH OF TILE CENTERLINE OF CINDY LANE:,
into the "RM -3000" RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE -FAMILY ZONE of the ity of
Anaheim, subject to the following conditions:
1. That introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject propd�rties
is contingent upon City Council approval of General Pla
Amendment No. 308, now pending.
BE V1 FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of th City
of Anaheim does hereby find and determine that the adoption f this
Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's complian a with
each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Shoul any
condition or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenfoeeable
by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction then
this Resolutior;, and any approvals herein contained, shall b
deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and �jdoptcd b4 the
City Council of the City of Anaheim th;s 1701 day of July, 19,90.
ATTHST : Orltinal Si f ned By
LECNGEid h. SOHL
City Clerk
CITY R 0 H1: CITY 0= ANAHEIM
JI.W:k11
38021,
071890
-2-
9"Ve" k 91W0 f!y
FKD "7EA
RECLASS 89-90-S
/ RecIass No.: 89-90-5g Quarter Section Map No.: 59 ❑
(Neg Dec)
Property: E & W sides of Loara St. from S/City Limits
extending N/660 ft and N & S/sides of Wilmot Lane
(over)
Petition: RM -1200 to RM -2400, or less intense zone
Date Action Res. No.
PC: 6/4/90 GRANTED TO RM -3000 PC90-144
CC: 6/26/90 SET FOR P.H. 7/17/90
7/17/90 APPROVED 90R--267,-
Ord. No.: Date: SLB No.: Date:
DEV -6-A
f f'
AFFIDAVIT OF PUBLICATION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
) ss.
County of Orange )
I am a citizen of the United States and a resident
of the County aforesaid; I am over the age of
eighteen years, and not a party to or interested
in the above entitled matter. I am the principal
clerk of the Anaheim Bulletin , a newspaper
that has been adjudged to be a newspaper of
general circulation by the Superior Court of the
County of Orange, State of California, on
December 28, 1951, Case No. A-21021 in and
for the City of Anaheim, County of Orange,
State of California; that the notice, of which the
annexed is a true printed copy, has been
published in each regular and entire issue of said
newspaper and not in any supplement thereof on
the following dates, to wit:
-April 26, 2001
"I certify (or declare) under the penalty of
perjury under the laws of the State of California
that the foregoing is true and correct":
Executed at Santa Ana, Orange County,
California, on
Date: April 26, 2001
Signature
Anaheim Bulletin
625 N. Grand Ave.
Santa Ana, CA 92701
(714) 796-7000 ext. 3002
PROOF OF PUBLICATION
This space is for the County Clerk's Filing Stamp
</ g `_�%
Proof of Publication of "
arollllwNCE NO. 5759
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
THE ZONNdG htAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
(RECLASSIFICATION NO. 89.90.58).
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES
FIND THAT:
WHEREAS, the City Council heretofore held a duly no-
ticed public headng and, as a result thereof, did adopt its
Resoltfion No. 9DR-267 determining that a change or'
changes in the zone or zones hereinafter mentioned and de
scribed should be made; and
WHEREAS, certain conditions and requirements were
made as conditions precedent to the making of a change or
changes of said zone or zones, which conditions have been
complied with.
NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
SECMN-t
That the Zoning map referred to in Title 18 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, arnrtrtdedby
rezoning and reclassifying that certain property situated in
the City ,and
Anaheim, Cot2i of Orange, State of California,
described as follows, to wt:
AREA 1 - APPROXIMATELY 7 ACRES CONSISTING OF
THOSE PARCELS LOCATED ON THE EAST AND WEST
SIDES OF LOARA STREET BEGINNING AT THE SOUTH
ERN CITY LIMITS AND EXTENDING NORTH APPROXI
MATELY 680 FEET; ALSO INCLUDING THOSE PARCELS
LOCATED ON THE NORTH AND SOUTH SIDES OF
WILMOT LANE. EXCEPTING THE PARCEL LOCATED ON
THE NORTHWEST CORNER OF WILMOT LANE AND
LOARA STREET.
AREA 2 - APPROXIMATELY 4.6 ACRES CONSISTING OF
THAT PARCEL LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF
EUCLID STREET, HAVING A FRONTAGE OF APPROXI
MATELY 330 FEET, HAVING A MAXIMUM DEPTH OF AP
PROXIMATELY 608 FEET AND BEING LOCATED AP
PROXIMATELY 190 FEET SOUTH OF THE CENTERLINE
OF CINDY LANE.
into the "RM -3000" RESIDENTIAL, MULTIPLE -FAMILY
ZONE of the City of Anaheim.
cl=r.TIDN 2.
The City Zoning Map shall be, and the same is hereby,
amended and the property above-described shall be exclud
ed from the zone in which it is now situated and incorporat-
ed in and made a part of the zone or zones as above set
forth, and said City Zoning Map, as amended, is hereby
adopted and the Planning Department is hereby directed to
prepare a sectional zoning map to be added to the City Zon
indopted.map showing the changes hereby approved and
a
THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE is approved and adopted
by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 17th day of
April, 2001.
TOM DALY
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST: SHERYLL SCHROEDER
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
Published: Anaheim Bulletin
April 26, 2001
25-559 4590774