2001-206RESOLUTION NO. 2001R- 206
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM CONFIRMING THE DIAGRAM AND
ASSESSMENT AND PROVIDING FOR THE LEVY OF THE
ANNUAL ASSESSMENT IN AND FOR THE ANAHEIM
RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT.
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim,
California, previously formed a special maintenance district
designated the ANAHEIM RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT (the
"Maintenance District") pursuant to the terms of Ordinance
No. 5670 of the City of Anaheim (the "Ordinance"), which
Ordinance incorporates the provisions of the ~Landscaping and
Lighting Act of 1972", being Division 15, Part 2 of the
Streets and Highways Code of the State of California (the
"Act"), except as provided in the Ordinance;
WHEREAS, based upon the presentation of staff and review
of the assessment Engineer's Report for the Maintenance District,
it is hereby determined as follows:
1. There are no new improvements or zones for the next
fiscal year;
Ail improvements to be maintained are within existing
public streets, rights-of-way, or easements of the City;
No assessments are proposed to be increased (other than
an authorized adjustment for inflation based on the
Consumer Price Index) from those as levied for the prior
fiscal year;
WHEREAS, at this time all notice and public hearing
requirements have been met relating to the levy of the annual
assessments and this City Council is now satisfied with the
assessment and diagram and all other matters as contained in the
Assessment Engineer's Report as now submitted for final
consideration and approval;
follows:
NOW, THEREFORE,
It Is Hereby Determined and Resolved as
RECITALS
SECTION 1. The above recitals are all true and
correct.
PROTESTS
SECTION 2. Ail protests and objections of every kind
and nature be, and the same hereby are, overruled and denied.
CONFIRMATION
SECTION 3. The final assessment and diagram for the
proceedings, as contained in the Assessment Engineer's Report, is
hereby approved and confirmed.
SECTION 4. The public interest and convenience
requires, and this legislative body does hereby order the
maintenance and improvements to be made and performed as set forth
in the Assessment Engineer's Report and as previously declared and
set forth in the Resolution of Intention adopted by this City
Council on June 19, 2001.
SECTION 5. The assessments contained in the
Assessment Engineer's Report for the next fiscal year are hereby
confirmed and levied upon the respective lots of parcels of land
in the District in amounts as set forth in the Final Assessment
Engineer's Report. It is hereby further determined that all costs
and expenses of the works of improvement and incidental expenses
have been apportioned and distributed to the benefitting parcels
in accordance with the special benefits received from the proposed
work.
FILING AND RECORDING
SECTION 6. The above-referenced diagram and
assessment for the Maintenance District shall be filed in the
Office of the City Clerk, with a certified copy filed in the
Office of the City Engineer. The diagram and assessment shall be
open for public inspection.
SECTION 7. The City Clerk is hereby ordered and
directed to immediately file a certified copy of the diagram and
assessment with the County Auditor. Said filing to be made no
later than the 3r~ Monday in August.
ENTRY UPON THE ASSESSMENT ROLL
SECTION 8. After the filing of the diagram and
assessment, the County Auditor shall enter on the County
assessment roll opposite each lot or parcel of land the amount
assessed thereupon, as shown in the assessment.
2
COLLECTION AND PAYMENT
SECTION 9. The assessments shall be collected at the
same time and in the same manner as County taxes are collected,
and all laws providing for the collection and enforcement of
County taxes shall apply to the collection and enforcement of the
assessments.
FISCAL YEAR
SECTION 10. The assessments as above authorized and
levied for these proceedings will provide revenue and relate to
the fiscal year commencing July 1, 2001 and ending June 30, 2002.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by
the City Council of the City of Anaheim thi~ 24t~'~day of July,
2001. z~ ~k
/
MAY(fR E I M
ATTEST:
CfTY CLERK OF'THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
36075.2\MSLAUGHT~June 12, 2000 3
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, SHERYLL SCHROEDER, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2001R-206 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of
the Anaheim City Council held on the 24th day of July, 2001, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES:
MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Kring, Tait, McCracken, Daly
NOES:
MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY CLER~ OF 'i:HE CITY Of ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ANAHEIM RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Willdan
Bob Hessell
July 9, 2001
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ANAHEIM RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
CITY OF ANAHEIM
MAYOR
Tom Daly
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Shirley McCracken, Mayor Pro Tem
Tom Tait
Frank Feldhaus
Lucille Kring
CITY STAFF
James D. Ruth, City Manager
Tom Wood, Assistant City Manager
Gary Johnson, City Engineer
Russell Maguire, Deputy City Engineer
Jeffrey Stone, Budget Manager
CONSULTANTS
Willdan
2125 East Katella Avenue, Suite 200
Anaheim, CA 92806
Bob Hessell
12707 High Bluff Drive, Suite 200
San Diego, CA 92131
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ANAHEIM RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I. INTRODUCTION
This Engineer's Report is prepared pursuant to the order of the City Council of the City of Anaheim and in
compliance with the requirements of Article 4, Chapter 1, Landscaping and Lighting Act of 1972 (1972 Act),
which is Part 2 of Division 15 of the Streets and Highways Code of the State of California; and in compliance
with Articles XlIIC and XIIID added to the California Constitution in November 1996 through the passage of
Proposition 218 by voters of the State of California. This report presents the engineering analysis for the
2001/2002 Fiscal Year for the district known as:
City of Anaheim
Anaheim Resort Maintenance District
(hereinafter referred to as the "District").
Reference is made to the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District Feasibility Report dated January 11, 1999 on
file in the City Clerk's office and the City Engineer's office, and made part of this report by reference. The
Feasibility Report contains detailed descriptions and cost data for the improvements to be funded through this
District.
The District was approved by property owners at the June 22, 1999 Public Hearing and will be collected on
property tax bills issued by the County of Orange Auditor-Contreller's Office. The property owners authorized
an annual increase in the assessment in an amount not to exceed the change in the Consumer Price Index, of
all Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-Anaheim-Riverside Area ("CPI"), from January through January of
the previous calendar year. This increase enables the District to keep current with increases in the cost of
labor and materials. The CPI increase from January 2000 through January 2001 was 3.75%. The total budget
for Fiscal Year ("FY") 2001/2002 has increased to $3,621,013, which includes Assessment Revenue, Interest
Income and the City's General Fund Contribution. This represents a 1.84% increase in the FY 2001/2002
Assessments over the FY 2000/2001 Assessments.
II. BOUNDARIES OF THE DISTRICT
The District boundaries are completely within the City limits of the City of Anaheim and coincide with the
boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundary as defined in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan.
The District boundaries are shown on the Assessment Diagram on file in the office of the City Clerk and are
made a part of this report by reference. County of Orange Assessor's maps shall govern for all details
concerning the lines and dimensions of such lots or parcels.
The District boundaries include an Extended Landscape Zone in recognition of the special benefit the parcels
in this zone receive from the unique Improvements in the zone. The Extended Landscape Zone currently
includes those parcels detailed in the boundary diagram on file in the office of the City Clerk. Other property
within a legally required setback in the District may be annexed into the Extended Landscape Zone upon the
request of the property owner.
III. IMPROVEMENTS
The District may fund Improvements, Maintenance, Servicing, Promotions, and Reserves for those items fully
detailed in the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District Feasibility Report dated January 11, 1999. The Plans
and Specifications for the District are on file with the City Clerk as Exhibit B and are made a part of this report
by reference.
Willdan 1 Fiscal Year 200112002
ENGINEER'S REPORT
ANAHEIM RESORT MAINTENANCE DISTRICT
CITY OF ANAHEIM
IV. FISCAL YEAR 2001/2002 BUDGET SUMMARY
The budget for the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District is included with the City of Anaheim budget approved
annually by City Council and available at the office of the City Clerk. The budget figures shown below include
revenues and expenditures for the Extended Landscape Zone. In FY 2000/2001 the total cost for the
Extended Landscape Zone was $635,500. For FY 2001/2002 these costs were increased by 1.84%, which is
less than the 3.75% increase in the Consumer Price Index, of all Urban Consumers, for the Los Angeles-
Anaheim-Riverside Area from January 2000 through January 2001. The total costs for the Extended
Landscape Zone for the 2001/2002 Fiscal Year is $647,193.
Projected Fund Balance 7/1/01
$3,688,948
Revenues
Assessment Revenue from Property Taxes
Interest income
General Fund Contribution
$3,284,013
$ t37,000
$ 200.000
Total Revenues
$3,621,013
Expenditures
Labor $ 498,933
Operating $2,766,830
Capital Outlay $ 355,250
Total Expenditures
$3,621,013
Operating Reserve
$3,688,948
Projected Fund Balance 7/1/02
$0
V. METHOD OF ASSESSMENT
The purpose of the improvements is to serve the hotel, convention, retail commemial, and other visitor-serving
uses within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area. The items funded through the District are above and
beyond the typical level of maintenance, servicing, and promotions provided by the City throughout the rest of
the City. The method of assessment for the improvement costs, was adopted by the City Council at the June
22, 1999 public hearing and is on file with the City Clerk and has not been changed for FY 2001/2002.
The assessment for each parcel is shown on the Assessment Roil on file with the City Clerk and incorporated
herein by reference.
Engineer's Conclusion
In conclusion, it is my opinion that the assessments within the City of Anaheim Resort Maintenance
District are apportioned by a formula that fairly distributes special benefit in accordance with the special
benefits that are received.
Willdan
2
Fiscal Year 2001/2002