Resolution-PC 2012-023RESOLUTION NO. PC2012 -023
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011 -05585
(DEV2011- 00136)
(630 SOUTH BROOKHURST STREET)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as
"Planning Commission ") did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-
05585 to permit a banquet facility, for that certain real property located at 630 South Brookhurst
Street, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly
shown in Exhibit "A ", attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, this property is currently developed with a commercial retail
building, located in the C -G (BCC) (General Commercial; Broolchurst Commercial Corridor
Overlay) Zone and the Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Corridor Residential
land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on April 9, 2012 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 "Procedures ", to hear and consider evidence for and against said
proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in
connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a conditional use permit to permit a
banquet facility, does find and determine the following facts.
1. The proposed request to establish a banquet facility the C -G (BCC) (General
Commercial; Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Overlay) Zone is properly one for which a
conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.030.010
(Community and Religious Assembly).
2. The proposed the conditional use permit to permit a banquet facility in an existing
commercial building would adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the proposed banquet
facility would continue to impact the adjacent residential uses with noise disturbances and create
a demand for parking that would negatively impact the operations of other commercial uses in
the vicinity.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or
health and safety because the proposed use is located adjacent to residential uses that are
currently negatively impacted by the business and the number of parking spaces is not adequate
to meet the needs of area businesses without negatively impacting their operations.
1 PC2012 -023
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon
the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim due to the
anticipated noise and parking impacts associated with the banquet facility.
6. The Planning Department has received correspondence from residents residing east
of the subject property, and from the Stater Bros. grocery store, indicating that the banquet
facility has been operating in a detrimental manner and multiple complaints have been filed
regarding excess noise and parking constraints.
NOW, THERFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, for the
reasons hereinabove stated, does hereby deny Conditional Use Permit No. 2011- 05585.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all
charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the
issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval
of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of April 9, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter
18.60 "Procedures" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
ATTEST:
a L c ?c
CHAIRMAN PRO TEMPORE, ANAHEIM CI PLANNING COMMISSION
SENIOR S CRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 2 - PC2012 -023
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on April 9, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, FAESSEL, LIEBERMAN, PERSAUD,
RAMIREZ, SEYMOUR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: AGARWAL
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9` day of April, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
3 PC2012 -023
EXHIBIT "A"
DEV NO. 2011 -00136
APN: 128 - 181 -19
W STONYBROOK DR
0 50 l00
Fcet
i
i
W ORANGE AVE
r
op
m
326'
327'
W NIOBE AVE
i
1
W CRONE AVE
Source: Recorded Tract Maps and /or City GIS.
Please note the accuracy is +/- two to five feet.
—4—
PC2012 -023