Loading...
PC 2012/05/21 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, May 21, 2012 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairman: Peter Agarwal • Chairman Pro-Tempore: Victoria Ramirez • Commissioners: Paul Bostwick, Stephen Faessel, Michelle Lieberman, Harry Persaud, John Seymour • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, May 17, 2012, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 05/21/12 Page 2 of 6 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments: This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 05/21/12 Page 3 of 6 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05598 (DEV2012-00027) Location: 430 South Anaheim Hills Road, Suites H through J The applicant requests to permit beer and wine sales for on and off-premises consumption at an existing restaurant. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Staff Report New Correspondence Project Planner: David See dsee@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05606 (DEV2012-00019) Location: 1831 and 1853 North Raymond Avenue The applicant requests to permit a recycling facility to be operated in conjunction with a non-profit organization. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Staff Report New Correspondence Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net 05/21/12 Page 4 of 6 ITEM NO. 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05596 VARIANCE NO. 2012-04889 (DEV2012-00009) Location: 1134 North State College Boulevard The applicant requests to remodel an existing commercial building, add a drive through lane for a proposed coffee shop, and permit two additional retail tenants with a drive through lane setback that is less than required by code and fewer parking spaces than required by code. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Staff Report New Correspondence Project Planner: David See dsee@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, June 4, 2012 at 5:00 p.m. 05/21/12 Page 5 of 6 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 4:30 p.m. May 16, 2012_ (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 05/21/12 Page 6 of 6 S C H E D U L E 2012 June 4 June 18 July 2 July 16 July 30 August 13 August 27 September 10 September 24 October 8 October 22 November 5 November 19 December 3 December 17 December 31 R M -4 (S C )C O N D O 50 D U O-L (SC)OFFICES C-G (SC)MEDICAL OFFICE C -G (S C )S E R V IC E S T A T IO N T (S C )S E N IO R C ITIZE N A P A R TM E N TS 117 D U C -G (S C )S E N IO R C IT IZ E N A P A R T M E N T S 1 3 1 D U C -G (S C )R E T A IL C -G (S C )D A Y C A R E RM-4 (SC)CONDO58 DU C-G (SC)MEDICAL OFFICE C-G (SC) SENIOR CITIZEN APARTMENTS T (SC)OPEN SPACE O S (S C )TE N N IS C O U R TS R M -2 (S C )C O N D O M IN IU M S /TO W N H O U S E S C -G (S C )R E T A IL E N O HL R A N C H R D E CANYON RIM RDS A N A H EI M HILLS R D S ANAHEIM HILLS RDS R A N C H VIE W CIR S RANCH VIEW CIRE . N O H L R ANC H RD E . CA N Y O N R I M R D S. FAIRMONT BLVD E . S A N T A A N A C A N YO N RD4 3 0 Sou th Anaheim Hills Road, Suites H t hrough J D E V N o. 2012-00027 Subject Property APN: 356-181-06 356-181-07356-181-08356-181-09356-181-18356-181-19 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11 E N O HL R A N C H R D E CANYON RIM RDS A N A H EI M HILLS R D S ANAHEIM HILLS RDS R A N C H VIE W CIR S RANCH VIEW CIRE . N O H L R ANC H RD E . CA N Y O N R I M R D S. FAIRMONT BLVD E . S A N T A A N A C A N YO N RD4 3 0 Sou th Anaheim Hills Road, Suites H t hrough J D E V N o. 2012-00027 Subject Property APN: 356-181-06 356-181-07356-181-08356-181-09356-181-18356-181-19 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2012-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05598 (DEV2012-00027) (430 SOUTH ANAHEIM HILLS ROAD, SUITES H-J) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2012- 05598 to permit beer and wine sales for on and off-premises consumption at an existing restaurant, for that certain real property located at 430 South Anaheim Hills Road, Suites H-J in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the subject restaurant occupies a 2,150 square foot tenant space within an existing 8.5-acre shopping center and is located in the C-G (SC) (General Commercial; Scenic Corridor Overlay) zone. The General Plan designates this property for Neighborhood Center land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 21, 2012, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the conditional use permit, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit beer and wine sales for on and off-premises consumption at an existing restaurant is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Code Section No. 18.08.030.010 (Alcoholic Beverage Sales - On Sale) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 2. The operation of the restaurant, including the beer and wine sales, will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located, as conditioned herein. 3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety as the operation of the restaurant is consistent with the operational characteristics of the shopping center. - 2 - PC2012-*** 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the volume of traffic planned for the streets and highways in the area. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the use is a bonafide full service restaurant with accessory beer and wine sales and the restaurant is located within an existing commercial building at the intersection of two arterial highways. WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05598, subject to the conditions of approval as stated in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which conditions are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this permit is approved without limitations on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 3 - PC2012-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2012. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May 21, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of May, 2012. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2012-*** - 5 - PC2012-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05598 (DEV2012-00027) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY GENERAL 1 At all times when the premises is open for business, the premises shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. Police 2 Subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premises (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the California Business and Professions Code. Police 3 There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Police 4 The property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by providing regular landscape maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty-four (24) hours from time of occurrence. Code Enforcement 5 Trash storage areas shall be maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Public Works, Planning 6 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Said lighting shall be decorative and complementary to the architecture of the building. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Police Department, Community Services Division approval. Police 7 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum alcohol purchase required. Police - 6 - PC2012-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 8 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Police 9 There shall be no entertainment, amplified music, or dancing permitted on the premises at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim. Police 10 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. Police 11 The business shall not employ or permit any persons to solicit or encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the licensed premises under any commission, percentage, salary, or other profit-sharing plan, scheme or conspiracy. Police 12 Subject property shall be developed and maintained substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos.1 (Site Plan) and 2 (Floor Plan), and as conditioned herein. Planning ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL N RAYMOND AVEN ORANGETHORPE PARKE KIM BERLY AVE E RAYMOND WAY E. ORANGETHORPE AVE 1 8 3 1 and 1853 North Raymond Avenue D E V N o. 2012-00019 Subject Property APN: 269-021-16 269-021-17 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11 N RAYMOND AVEN ORANGETHORPE PARKE KIM BERLY AVE E RAYMOND WAY E. ORANGETHORPE AVE 1 8 3 1 and 1853 North Raymond Avenue D E V N o. 2012-00019 Subject Property APN: 269-021-16 269-021-17 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2012-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05606 (DEV2012-00019) (1831 AND 1853 NORTH RAYMOND AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2012- 05606, to permit a recycling facility pursuant to Section 18.60.180 of the Anaheim Municipal Code for that certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more partiularly shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, these properties are currently developed with industrial buildings, located in the I (Industrial) Zone and the Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 21, 2012, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 “Procedures”, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The proposed recycling facilitiy is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Code Section No. 18.10.030.040.0402. 2. The proposed recycling facility will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because it is compatible with the adjacent industrial uses; 3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the recycling facility is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4. The traffic generated by the recycling facility will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the volume of traffic planned for the streets and highways in the area; - 2 - PC2012-*** 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a variance, does find and determine the following facts: WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, for the reasons hereinabove stated does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05606 to permit a recycling facility. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby grant Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05606 subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. - 3 - PC2012-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 “Procedures” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May 21, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of May, 2012. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2012-*** - 5 - PC2012-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05606 (DEV2012-00019) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE BUSINESS 1 The property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty four (24) hours from time of occurrence. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 2 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24-hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division GENERAL 3 The recycling facility at 1831 N. Raymond Avenue shall only operate as a “Processing Facility” as defined by A.M.C. Section 18.48.030.060. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 4 The recycling facility at 1853 N. Raymond Avenue shall only operate as a ““Collection Facility” as defined by A.M.C. Section 18.48.030.020.0203. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 5 The recycling facility shall comply with all State laws pertaining to the requirements for junk dealers and recyclers. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 6 That no required parking areas shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage uses. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 7 The subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plans) and Exhibit No. 2 (Floor Plans), and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Conditional Use Permit for Orange County Conservation Corps Project Address: 1831 Raymond, Anaheim, Ca February 21, 2012 Photo Study Photo Reference Key Plan ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Photo 1 – 1831 N. Raymond Ave (OCCC Location) East Side of the Building (Facing Raymond) Photo 2 – 1831 N. Raymond Ave. (OCCC Location) North-Eastern Corner of Building (Facing Kimberly) Photo 3 – 1853 N. Raymond Ave (Adjacent OCCC Loaction) Adjacent Building (East Façade Facing Raymond) Photo 4 – 1114 E. Kimberly Ave Adjacent Building (North-East Corner Facing Kimberly) Photo 5 – 1115 E. Kimberly Ave Adjacent Building (South-East Corner facing Kimberly) Photo 6 – 1811-1817 N. Raymond Ave Adjacent Building (East Façade Facing Raymond) Photo 7 – 800 S. Raymond Ave Adjacent Building (West Façade Facing Raymond) Photo 8 – 1831 N. Raymond Ave (OCCC Location) Side Yard (Facing Kimberly) Photo 9 – 1831 N. Raymond Ave (OCCC Location) Back Parking Lot / Loading Zone Photo 10 – 1831 N. Raymond Ave (OCCC Location) Alley / Loading Zone ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. C-GRETAIL RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4PLACENTIA WOODSAPTS56 DU RM-4GARRITYAPTS24 DU RM-4SUMMERHILL VILLAGE APTS92 DU RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4TRIPLEX RM-4TRIPLEX RM-4APTS8 DURM-4APTS22 DU RM-4HIDDEN VILLAGEAPTS20 DU C-GRETAIL RM-4ARBOR PAR K APTS291 DU RM-4WOODHAVENAPTS18 DU C-GRELIGIOUS USE RM-4EDGEWOOD PARKAPTS13 DU C-GRESTAURANT C-GSERVICESTATION RS-3SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE C-GRETAIL RM-4SUMMERHILL VILLAGE APTS92 DURM-4TRIPLEXRM-4FOURPLEXRM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RM-4FOURPLEX N STATE COLLEGE BLVDN PLACENTIA AVEE ROMNEYA DR E BA LSAM AVE N ADAIR PLN CURTIS CTE BA NYAN DR E. LA PALMA AVEN. EAST STN. ACACIA STE. ORANGETHORPE AVE N. BLUE GUM S T E . L IN C OLN AVE N. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA STE. MIRALOMA AV E 113 4 N o r t h Stat e C o ll e ge Bou l e v a r d D E V N o. 2 0 1 2 -0 00 0 9 Subject Property APN: 268-221-01 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l P ho to:May 2 011 N STATE COLLEGE BLVDN PLACENTIA AVEE ROMNEYA DR E BA LSAM AVE N ADAIR PLN CURTIS CTE BA NYAN DR E. LA PALMA AVEN. EAST STN. ACACIA STE. ORANGETHORPE AVE N. BLUE GUM S T E . L IN C OLN AVE N. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA STE. MIRALOMA AV E 113 4 N o r t h Stat e C o ll e ge Bou l e v a r d D E V N o. 2 0 1 2 -0 00 0 9 Subject Property APN: 268-221-01 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l P ho to:May 2 011 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2012-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05596 AND VARIANCE NO. 2012-04889 (DEV2012-00009) (1134 NORTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter "Planning Commission") did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05596 and Variance No. 2012-04889 to remodel an existing commercial building, add a drive through lane for a proposed coffee shop, and permit two additional retail tenants with fewer parking spaces than required by code, for that certain real property located at 1134 North State College Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State Of California, as more particularly shown in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "subject property"); and WHEREAS, the 0.46-acre property is developed with a 3,600 square foot vacant commercial building and is located in the C-G (General Commercial) Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Medium Density Residential land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 21, 2012 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 “Procedures”, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and 1. The proposed retail center and drive through restaurant is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.08.030.010 (Commercial Retail Centers; Restaurants – Drive Through). 2. The drive through restaurant will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. The drive though lane will be located in close proximity to an existing apartment complex to the east; however, the applicant proposes to mitigate sound levels by locating the speaker box away from the apartment complex, constructing an 8-foot high block wall, and installing landscaping between the two properties. 3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because this use will be located within an existing building of an established business area along a major arterial highway. - 2 - PC2012-*** 4. The traffic generated by the retail center and drive through restaurant will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the use is similar to other commercial uses in the area and sound levels generated by the drive through lane will be reduced in order to minimize impacts on the adjacent residential property to the east. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for the following variance, does find and determine the following facts: (a) SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (28 spaces required; 23 spaces proposed) (b) SECTION NO. 18.42.080.030 Minimum drive through lane setback. (DELETED) 1. The parking variance will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for such use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles anticipated for the proposed use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable operation of such use as indicated in the May, 2012 parking study prepared by the applicant’s consultant, Kimley Horn and Associates. 2. The parking variance will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets, nor upon adjacent properties in the immediate vicinity, as indicated in the aforementioned parking study which concludes that the proposed 23 parking spaces are adequate to meet a maximum demand of 18 spaces for all of the uses combined. This is based upon a peak hour demand of 8 spaces for the coffee shop and 10 spaces for the two retail spaces, resulting in a surplus of 5 spaces. 3. The parking variance will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas provided for the proposed use. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby find that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05596 and Variance No. 2012-04889, subject to the conditions of approval as stated in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which conditions are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for - 3 - PC2012-*** compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 21, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 “Procedures” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2012-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on May 21, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of May, 2012. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 5 - PC2012-*** - 6 - PC2012-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05596 AND VARIANCE NO. 2012-04889 (DEV2012-00009) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 1 A lot line adjustment shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division to merge Parcel 1, TM 3370 and remnant parcel into one parcel. The Lot Line Adjustment shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded, along with perfecting deed, in the office of the Orange County Recorder prior to issuance of a building permit. Public Works 2 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim a right-of-way corner cut-off at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Balsam Avenue for road and public utilities purposes. Public Works 3 Trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage areas shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from graffiti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum one-gallon size clinging vines planted on maximum three-foot centers or tall shrubbery. Public Works, Planning PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION 4 Fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any Time.” Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works, Fire 5 An eight foot high block wall shall be constructed along the east property line. Said information shall be shown on plans submitted for building permits. Planning GENERAL 6 The speaker box system for the drive through lane shall be designed with volume settings that produce not more than 60 decibels at the east property line. Said system shall also be designed such that the volume adjustment is controlled from inside the restaurant. Code Enforcement 7 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage. Code Enforcement - 7 - PC2012-*** 8 Granting of the parking variance is contingent upon operation of this facility in conformance with the assumptions and/or conclusions relating to the operation and intensity of the uses as described in the parking study dated May, 2012 prepared by Kimley Horn and Associates, which formed the basis for approval of said variance. Exceeding, violating, intensifying or otherwise deviating from any of said assumptions and/or conclusions, as contained in the parking letter, may subject this variance to termination pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.60 - Procedures of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Planning 9 The drive-through lane shall not be utilized between the hours of 10:00 p.m. and 5:00 a.m., daily. Code Enforcement 10 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 (Site Plan), 2 (Floor Plan), 3 and 4 (Elevations), and 4 (Landscaping) and as conditioned herein. Planning ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Parking Study for the: PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER AT 1134 N. STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD In the City of Anaheim Prepared for: Uriel Anaheim Holdings, LLC Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. April, 2012 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PARKING STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER AT 1134 N. STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM Prepared for: Uriel Anaheim Holdings, LLC 8913 W. Olympic Boulvard Suite 101 Beverly Hills, California 90211 Prepared by: Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 765 The City Drive, Suite 400 Orange, California 92868 714-939-1030 April, 2012 © Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. PARKING STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER AT 1134 N. STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TABLE OF CONTENTS Page INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................... 1 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ......................................................................................................... 1 CITY OF ANAHEIM PARKING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................. 3 Parking Requirement per City Code......................................................................................... 3 EXISTING PARKING DEMAND .............................................................................................. 5 Parking Data Collection at a Comparable Starbucks Restaurant ............................................... 5 PARKING SUPPLY ADEQUACY ............................................................................................. 7 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR A PARKING VARIANCE .......................................................... 9 CONCLUSIONS....................................................................................................................... 11 APPENDICES Appendix A – City of Anaheim Municipal Code – Chapter 18.42 (Relevant Sections) Appendix B – Parking Data Collection LIST OF FIGURES Page Figure 1 – Project Site Plan ......................................................................................................... 2 LIST OF TABLES Page Table 1 – Summary of Parking Requirements per City Code........................................................ 4 Table 2 – Parking Data Collection at a Comparable Site .............................................................. 6 Table 3 – Forecasted Parking Requirement for the Proposed Project ............................................ 8 Parking Study for - 1 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1134 N. State College Blvd, Anaheim, California April, 2012 PARKING STUDY FOR THE PROPOSED RETAIL CENTER AT 1134 N. STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM INTRODUCTION This report has been prepared to evaluate the parking needs for the proposed retail center located at 1134 N. State College Boulevard in the City of Anaheim. The project site is located at the southeast corner of N. State College Boulevard and E. Romneya Drive/N. Plancentia Avenue, approximately 1,000 feet south of the Riverside Freeway (SR-91). The site is developed with one building that is currently used as a produce market. The applicant proposes to remodel the building to include three suites totaling 3,600 square feet, and renovate the site to provide 23 parking spaces. The parking supply at the renovated project site will not provide enough parking to meet the City of Anaheim Parking Code requirements, and therefore, a parking variance will be required. A parking analysis has been conducted in order to determine whether or not the requested variance can be supported by the Required Findings in accordance with the requirements of Section 18.42.110 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. PROJECT DESCRIPTION The project site is located at the southeast corner of the intersection of N. State College Boulevard and E. Romneya Drive/N. Placentia Avenue. E. Balsam Avenue forms the southern boundary of the project site, and residential units border the site to the east. The site currently has one driveway on N. Placentia Avenue and two driveways on E. Balsam Avenue. The applicant proposes to renovate the existing building and parking lot. The proposed development would consist of a retail center with a drive-through Starbucks restaurant and two additional retail/commercial tenant units. The Starbucks restaurant would be 1,800 square feet, and each retail/commercial tenant unit would be 900 square feet. The total size of the building would be 3,600 square feet. The project site plan is provided on Figure 1. A total of 23 parking spaces are shown on the site plan, including two handicap accessible spaces. Access to and from the proposed development would be provided by two driveways. The existing driveway on N. Placentia Avenue provides in and out access and will remain in place. The existing easterly driveway on E. Balsam Avenue will be removed and replaced with curb, gutter and sidewalk. The existing westerly driveway on E. Balsam Avenue will be reconstructed to allow exiting traffic only. Starbucks’ drive-through lane would be located near the driveway on E. Balsam Avenue. It would wrap around the southern and eastern edges of the building, and then would exit near the northeast corner of the building. The drive-through lane would be approximately 170 feet long, providing queuing for approximately eight vehicles. Parking Study for - 3 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1134 N. State College Blvd, Anaheim, California April, 2012 CITY OF ANAHEIM PARKING REQUIREMENTS Parking Requirement per City Code The City of Anaheim parking requirements are contained in Chapter 18.42 of the City’s Municipal Code, which specifies the City’s off-street parking requirements for a variety of land uses. A copy of the relevant sections from Chapter 18.42 is provided as Appendix A. The City’s parking code requirements for the proposed retail center uses are: Restaurant – General – Drive-through ƒ10 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area (GFA). Retail Sales – General ƒ5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for the first 100,000 square feet. Table 1 shows that based on the City’s parking requirement, the project would require 28 parking spaces. The proposed site plan shows 23 parking spaces, which represents a parking deficiency of 5 spaces; therefore a variance will be required. This parking analysis was conducted to determine whether the requested variance can be supported by the Required Findings. Table 1 Parking Requirements per City Code for 1134 N. State College Boulevard City Parking Parking Spaces Required Restaurant - Drive-thru 1.80 KSF 10 spaces/KSF 18.00 Retail Sales - General 1.80 KSF 5.5 spaces/KSF 9.90 TOTAL 3.600 KSF 27.9 Total Parking Spaces Required 28 Total Parking Spaces Provided 23 Parking Surplus / (Deficit)-5 Land Use Size Requirement - 4 - Parking Study for - 5 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1134 N. State College Blvd, Anaheim, California April, 2012 EXISTING PARKING DEMAND Parking Data Collection at a Comparable Starbucks Restaurant Parking requirements for Starbucks was based on drive-through restaurant per City Code because it is the most similar use in the Code. However, Starbucks is not a typical drive-through restaurant; therefore, parking requirement for the proposed Starbucks drive-through restaurant was forecasted by collecting parking data at an existing comparable Starbucks to determine the actual parking demand rate. The Starbucks restaurant located at 13102 Goldenwest Street in Westminster was selected for the observations. This location was selected because it is comparable in size to the proposed Starbucks restaurant; it has a drive-through lane; and is located in a similar setting as the proposed restaurant. According to Starbucks corporate office, this restaurant is 1,600 square feet. This Starbucks shares the parking lot with two other food- related tenants; however, only vehicles parked for the Starbucks restaurant were counted for this data collection effort. The parking lot of this comparable site was observed from 7:00 AM to 3:00 PM on Tuesday, April 17, 2012. Parking counts were tabulated each half-hour. The parking data collection worksheet is provided as Appendix B. A summary of the parking data collected at the existing comparable Starbucks restaurant is provided on Table 2. Table 2 shows the number of parked vehicles for the comparable Starbucks restaurant during each half-hour of the data collection period. The data indicates that the highest number of vehicles parked during the data collection period was 8 vehicles at 8:00 AM. The collected data is consistent with the information provided by representative of Starbucks, who indicated that peak customer activity occurs in the morning commute hours, then slowly decline throughout the morning with a slight increase in the early afternoon. Compared to the restaurant size of 1,600 square feet, this would result in a peak parking demand rate of 5.0 parking spaces per 1,000 square foot. Table 2 also shows the percentage of the peak parking demand during each half-hour. For example, at 11:00 AM, 4 vehicles were parked for Starbucks, which represents 50% of the peak demand at 8:00 AM. Table 2 Parking Data Collection at a Comparable Site LOCATION:13102 Goldenwest Street, #A, Westminster, California Size:1,600 square feet Number of Percentage of Derived Ratio Time Occupied Spaces Peak Demand (Spaces per KSF) 7:00 AM 3 37.5%1.9 7:30 AM 6 75.0%3.8 8:00 AM 8 100.0%5.0 8:30 AM 6 75.0%3.8 9:00 AM 6 75.0%3.8 9:30 AM 6 75.0%3.8 10:00 AM 5 62.5%3.1 10:30 AM 5 62.5%3.1 11:00 AM 4 50.0%2.5 11:30 AM 5 62.5%3.1 12:00 PM 5 62.5%3.1 12:30 PM 5 62.5%3.1 1:00 PM 7 87.5%4.4 1:30 PM 6 75.0%3.8 2:00 PM 7 87.5%4.4 2:30 PM 7 87.5%4.4 3:00 PM 6 75.0%3.8 Observed Peak 8 5.0 - 6 - Parking Study for - 7 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1134 N. State College Blvd, Anaheim, California April, 2012 PARKING SUPPLY ADEQUACY As previously shown on Table 1, per application of the city parking code, the proposed retail center would have a parking requirement of 28 parking spaces, 18 spaces for the Starbucks restaurant with drive-through service and 10 spaces for the two retail tenants,. Based on the existing parking demand counts conducted at a comparable Starbucks restaurant with drive- through service, Starbucks has an observed peak parking demand rate of 5.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet. This results in a maximum parking demand of 9 spaces for the proposed Starbucks. Using the observed parking demand rate at a comparable Starbucks and the City Code parking rate for retail uses, the proposed project site would have a combined parking requirement of 19 spaces. However, because Starbucks and the two retail tenants would have different peak business hours, an hour-by-hour analysis of the parking demand is presented in Table 3. Table 3 indicates that Starbucks would experience its peak business activity at 8:00 AM, then gradually decline throughout the rest of the day, except for a slight increase in the early afternoon. Hourly parking variation for the retail use is based on Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) publication Shared Parking, 2 nd Edition. Based on the hourly shared parking analysis, the forecasted peak parking demand at the project site would be 18 spaces at 1:00 PM and 2:00 PM, when Starbucks would require 8 spaces and the retail tenants would require 10 spaces. A surplus of 5 parking spaces is forecasted during the peak demand. At this time Starbucks would experience 87.5% of the peak demand, while the retail stores would be at 95-100% of their peak demand. Based on empirical parking data for Starbucks, and ULI time-of-day values for retail uses, the project site would experience a surplus of 5 parking spaces or more at all times of the day. A surplus of 5 parking spaces means that parking demand for the proposed project could fluctuate by as much as 28% and the parking supply of 23 spaces would still be sufficient to accommodate the site parking demand. Table 3 Forecasted Parking Requirement for the Proposed Project Based on Observed Parking Demand and Derived Parking Ratios Starbucks (1,800 sf) Derived Ratio: 5.0 City Code:5.5 Parking Req'd: 9 Parking Req'd:10 Percentage of Adjusted Parking Percentage of Adjusted Parking Total Parking Time Peak Demand 1 Requirement Peak Demand 2 Requirement Requirement 7:00 AM 37.5%3 5%1 4 7:30 AM 75.0%7 10%1 8 8:00 AM 100.0%9 15%2 11 8:30 AM 75.0%7 25%3 10 9:00 AM 75.0%7 35%4 11 9:30 AM 75.0%7 50%5 12 10:00 AM 62.5%6 65%7 13 10:30 AM 62.5%6 75%8 14 11:00 AM 50.0%5 85%9 14 11:30 AM 62.5%6 90%9 15 12:00 PM 62.5%6 95%10 16 12:30 PM 62.5%6 97%10 16 1:00 PM 87.5%8 100%10 18 1:30 PM 75.0%7 97%10 17 2:00 PM 87.5%8 95%10 18 2:30 PM 87.5%8 93%9 17 3:00 PM 75.0%7 90%9 16 Forecasted Peak Parking Requirement 18 Forecasted Parking Surplus 5 Retail/Commercial (1,800 sf) 1 Based on actual parking data collected at a similar Starbucks restaurant in Westminster, California 2 Based on Urban Land Institute's (ULI) Shared Parking model, 2nd Edition. - 8 - Parking Study for - 9 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1134 N. State College Blvd, Anaheim, California April, 2012 REQUIRED FINDINGS FOR A PARKING VARIANCE In accordance with the requirements of Section 18.42.110 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, the following findings have been made to document the adequacy of the parking supply for the proposed retail center at 1134 N. State College Boulevard in Anaheim: 1.The variance will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use. The forecasted peak parking requirement for the retail center at 1134 N. State College Boulevard based on this analysis would be 18 parking spaces. The project site would provide a total of 23 parking spaces. This amount of parking would be adequate to meet the expected parking needs. 2.The variance will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The results of the parking analysis indicate that the parking demand for the retail center at 1134 N. State College Boulevard would be accommodated completely on-site, therefore the demand and competition for on-street parking will not be negative impacted. In fact, by eliminating the easterly driveway and narrowing the westerly driveway on E. Balsam Avenue, the proposed project would increase approximately 50 feet of curb space, increasing on-street parking capacity by approximately two vehicles. 3.The variance will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance with Section 18.42.050.030). The results of the parking analysis indicate that the parking demand for the retail center at 1134 N. State College Boulevard would not depend on an off-site parking supply or parking spaces in an adjacent private property. 4.The variance will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for such use. The proposed retail center would continue to use the driveway on N. Placentia Avenue for inbound and outbound traffic. The westerly driveway on E. Balsam Avenue would be reconstructed to allow exiting only, and the easterly driveway on E. Balsam Avenue would be removed. The variance would not increase traffic congestion within the project parking areas. Parking Study for - 10 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1134 N. State College Blvd, Anaheim, California April, 2012 5.The variance will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public street in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. Ingress and egress for the retail center at 1134 N. State College Boulevard would be via N. Placentia Avenue and E. Balsam Avenue. The retail center would not share any driveways with any adjacent properties and would not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from any other properties. Parking Study for - 11 -Kimley-Horn and Associates, Inc. 1134 N. State College Blvd, Anaheim, California April, 2012 CONCLUSIONS x The applicant proposes to renovate the existing retail site at 1134 N. State College Boulevard in the City of Anaheim. The proposed development would consist of a retail center with a drive-through Starbucks restaurant and two additional retail/commercial tenant units. x The project site would have an on-site parking supply of 23 parking spaces. x Based on the city parking code, the proposed retail center would have a parking requirement of 28 parking spaces, including 18 spaces for the Starbucks store with drive-through service and 10 spaces for the two retail tenants. x Based on parking demand counts at a comparable Starbucks store with drive-through service in Westminster, Starbucks has an observed peak parking demand of 5.0 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on the observed parking demand rate, the proposed Starbucks restaurant would have a forecasted parking demand of 9 parking spaces. x Hourly parking demand for the retail use is based on published data from the ULI. x Based on the shared parking analysis, the forecasted peak parking demand for the proposed project would be 18 spaces at 1:00 PM and 2:00 PM, when Starbucks would require 8 spaces and the retail use would require 10 spaces. The project site would experience a parking surplus of 5 or more parking spaces at all times of the day. The requested parking variance can be supported by the results and findings of this parking data collection and analysis. APPENDIX A City of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 18.42 (Relevant Sections) applicable Engineering Standard Details pertaining to private street sections, and that serves the interior circulation of a mobile home park. (Ord. 6031 § 33; August 22, 2006.) .060 Senior Citizen Housing. .0601 The minimum required number of off-street parking spaces for senior citizen housing shall be one (1) parking space for each studio unit and one-bedroom unit, and two (2) parking spaces for each two-bedroom unit. .0602 All parking spaces shall be located so as to minimize the walking distance from the living area to the parking facility. .0603 Parking spaces may be covered or open, and shall be unassigned and equally available to all residents, guests or employees. .0604 Tandem spaces shall not be permitted. .070 Second Residential Units. .0701 Second Units, as defined in paragraph .0205 of subsection 18.38.230.020, in conformance with the criteria and standards of Section 18.38.230 (Second Units) of Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations): one (1) off-street parking space for each efficiency unit or one- bedroom unit; and two (2) off-street parking spaces for each two-bedroom unit. Required parking spaces for Second Units shall not be in tandem to other on-site parking spaces for the main dwelling unit. .0702 Senior Second Units (granny units), for which a conditional use permit is approved, as authorized by Section 65852.1 of the California Government Code: one (1) off-street parking space for each unit. Required parking spaces for senior Second Units shall not be in tandem to other on-site parking spaces for the main dwelling unit. (Ord. 5920 § 1 (part); June 8, 2004: Ord. 5944 20; September 28, 2004.) 18.42.040 NON-RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS. .010 Parking Spaces. Non-residential off-street parking requirements for automobiles and other vehicles shall be determined by the type of use (use class) associated with the property. Table 42-A (Non-Residential Parking Requirements) specifies the number of parking spaces for each non-residential use, regardless of the zone district in which the use is located. .0101 For uses not listed, parking requirements may be those determined to be reasonably necessary by the Planning Services Manager of the Planning Department and/or his or her designee. The Planning Services Manager of the Planning Department and/or his or her designee may require a parking study in order to make this determination. .0102 Except as expressly provided in this section, within a business unit containing more than one (1) use class, the minimum number of parking spaces shall be based on the use class with the highest parking requirement. If a combination of parking ratios applies, the number of required spaces shall be the sum total of the requirements for each type of use established. Page 5 of 20 4/11/2012http://www.amlegal.com/alpscripts/get-content.aspx .0103 For purposes of interpretation of this section, “GFA” shall mean gross floor area of buildings as measured from exterior wall to exterior wall. .0104 In computing parking requirements, fractional numbers shall be rounded off to the nearest whole number, fractions of one-half (0.5) or more being counted as one (1) full space. .0105 If the GFA upon which the number of parking spaces is based is less than one thousand (1,000) square feet (or other unit of measurement as designated herein), the minimum number of required spaces shall be prorated in direct proportion to the minimum number of spaces required for each one thousand (1,000) square feet (or other unit of measurement designated herein). Such proration shall also apply in instances where a division of such applicable unit of measurement into the GFA produces a quotient of other than a whole number. .0106 Except as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, any employee parking space requirements shall be based on the maximum number of employees present at any given time. .0107 Except as otherwise expressly provided in this chapter, all parking spaces shall conform to the applicable Engineering Standard Details pertaining to minimum off-street parking dimensions. .0108 If a parking demand study is required by Table 42-A (Non-Residential Parking Requirements) due to the unique nature of the use, the parking requirements shall be determined by the Planning Services Manager of the Planning Department and/or his or her designee and/or the Planning Commission based on information contained in a parking demand study prepared by an independent traffic engineer. The study shall be provided by the applicant, at its sole expense, to the City at the time of application for such use. (Ord. 6031 § 34; August 22, 2006: Ord. 6101 § 35; April 22, 2008.) .020 Trucks and Other Vehicles. In addition to the requirements in Table 42-A (Non-Residential Parking Requirements), spaces shall be provided for trucks and other vehicles used in the business, of a number and size adequate to accommodate the maximum number and types of trucks and/or vehicles to be parked on the site at any one time. Table 42-A NON-RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS Use Class Required Spaces Agricultural Crops 5 spaces per 10 acres. Alcoholic Beverage Sales–Off-Sale 0 spaces (spaces are required for underlying uses only). Alcoholic Beverage Sales–On-Sale 0 spaces (spaces are required for underlying uses only). Ambulance Services 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, plus parking for ambulances/emergency vehicles. Animal Boarding 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for first 100,000 square feet, plus 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA over 100,000 square feet. Animal Grooming 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for first 100,000 square feet, plus 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA over 100,000 square feet. Antennas–Broadcasting 2 spaces. Antennas–Private Transmitting None. Antennas–Telecommunications 1 space. Automatic Teller Machines 2 spaces per machine. Page 6 of 20 4/11/2012http://www.amlegal.com/alpscripts/get-content.aspx Repair Services–General 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for first 100,000 square feet, plus 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA over 100,000 square feet. Repair Services–Limited 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for first 100,000 square feet, plus 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA over 100,000 square feet. Research & Development 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for buildings of 3 stories or lower; 3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for buildings of more than 3 stories. Restaurants–General Drive-In, Drive- Through, Fast-Food: 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Take-Out (not to exceed a cumulative maximum total of ten seats for patrons): 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Restaurants–Full Service 8 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA if integrated into a planned development complex; 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, if not integrated into a planned development complex. Restaurants–Semi-Enclosed 8 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, if integrated into a planned development complex; 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, if not integrated into a planned development complex. Restaurants–Take-Out 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Restaurants–Walk-Up 16 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Table 42-A NON-RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS Use Class Required Spaces Retail Sales–General General: 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for first 100,000 square feet, plus 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA over 100,000 square feet. Art Galleries: 3.3 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Furniture, Carpet & Flooring: 2.25 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Retail Sales–Kiosks 1 space per 25 square feet of GFA or 3 spaces per facility, whichever results in a greater number of parking spaces. Retail Sales–Outdoor 0.4 space per 1,000 square feet of lot area devoted to outdoor uses, excluding parking areas and vehicular accessways, or 0.5 space per each employee engaged in the outdoor operation, whichever results in a greater number of parking spaces. Retail Sales–Regional Furniture, Carpet & Flooring: 2.25 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Other: 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for first 100,000 square feet, plus 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA over 100,000 square feet. Retail Sales–Used Merchandise 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for first 100,000 square feet, plus 4.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA over 100,000 square feet. Room & Board 1 space for each bedroom, plus 1 space for each nonresident employee, plus 1 space for visitors (for purposes of this provision, "Bedroom" means any room designed, intended or primarily used for sleeping purposes). Self-Storage Facilities 0.27 space per 1,000 square feet of building GFA or 5 spaces, whichever results in a greater number of spaces, plus adequate loading and unloading areas as required by the Planning Services Manager or his/her designee. Sex-Oriented Businesses Primarily Live Performance: 10 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. Page 11 of 20 4/11/2012http://www.amlegal.com/alpscripts/get-content.aspx APPENDIX B Parking Data Collection at Starbucks 13102 Goldenwest Street, #A, Westminster, CA 92683 Location:13102 Goldenwest St Day:Tuesday City:Westminster Date:4/17/2012 Regular Handicapped 7:00 AM 3 0 3 7:30 AM 6 0 6 8:00 AM 8 0 8 8:30 AM 5 1 6 9:00 AM 5 1 6 9:30 AM 6 0 6 10:00 AM 5 0 5 10:30 AM 5 0 5 11:00 AM 4 0 4 11:30 AM 5 0 5 12:00 PM 5 0 5 12:30 PM 5 0 5 1:00 PM 7 0 7 1:30 PM 6 0 6 2:00 PM 7 0 7 2:30 PM 7 0 7 3:00 PM 6 0 6 Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services TIME TotalsStarbucks Parking Starbucks Parking Study ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.