PC 2012/12/03
City of Anaheim
Planning Commission
Agenda
Monday, December 3, 2012
Council Chamber, City Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California
• Chair: Victoria Ramirez
• Chair Pro-Tempore: Harry Persaud
• Commissioners: Peter Agarwal, Paul Bostwick, Stephen Faessel,
Michelle Lieberman, John Seymour
• Call To Order - 5:00 p.m.
• Pledge Of Allegiance
• Public Comments
• Public Hearing Items
• Commission Updates
• Discussion
• Adjournment
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the
agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary.
A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department,
200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also
available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday,
November 29, 2012, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of
the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally
exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the
Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
California, during regular business hours.
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following
e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net
12/03/12
Page 2 of 7
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications,
Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations,
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission
action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written
form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City
Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for
public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by
the City Clerk of said hearing.
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council
at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M.
Public Comments:
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the
exception of public hearing items.
12/03/12
Page 3 of 7
Public Hearing Items
ITEM NO. 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05602
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04905
(DEV2012-00042)
Location: 1005 North Euclid Avenue
Request: To permit and retain a truck rental facility in
conjunction with an existing check cashing facility in an
existing commercial center with fewer parking spaces
than permitted by Code.
Environmental Determination: The proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1
(Existing Facilities).
Continued from the August 27, 2012, September 24, 2012
and November 19, 2012 Planning Commission meetings.
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Vanessa Norwood
vnorwood@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2012-00250
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2012-144
(DEV2012-00117)
Location: 501 South West Street
Request: To rezone a .54-acre property from the
Transition (T) zone to the Single-Family Residential
(RS-3) zone and to establish a three-lot subdivision to
allow the future construction of three single-family homes.
Environmental Determination: The proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 32
(In-Fill Development Projects).
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Andy Nogal
anogal@anaheim.net
12/03/12
Page 4 of 7
ITEM NO. 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05633
(DEV2012-00116)
Location: 1256 North Magnolia Avenue
Request: To establish an indoor soccer/trampoline facility
in an existing industrial building.
Environmental Determination: A Negative Declaration has
been determined to serve as the appropriate environmental
impact determination for this request per the California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Andy Nogal
anogal@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 5
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04913
FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2012-00006
(DEV2012-00112)
Location: 1027 South Harbor Boulevard
Request: To permit the expansion of an existing
restaurant with a lesser interior setback and fewer parking
spaces than required by Code.
Environmental Determination: The proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1
(Existing Facilities).
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Scott Koehm
skoehm@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 6
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04912
(DEV2012-00104)
Location: 1660 West Katella Avenue
Request: To permit a wall sign that is larger than permitted
by Code.
Environmental Determination: The proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1
(Existing Facilities).
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Vanessa Norwood
vnorwood@anaheim.net
12/03/12
Page 5 of 7
ITEM NO. 7
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2012-00486
ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2012-00107
MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2012-00559
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002 (DAG2007-00007B)
(DEV2012-00060)
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002 (DAG-2008-00002D)
(DEV2012-00059)
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17494
Location: 905, 915, 917 East Katella Avenue and
1005, 1015, 1025, 1105 East Katella Avenue
Request: To amend the General Plan to modify Table LU-4:
“General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City” to
increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of
office and commercial development allowed within the Mixed Use
land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend
various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a
public park; to amend Chapter 18.20 of the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code to reflect proposed amendments to the General Plan;
to amend the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan to reflect
proposed amendments to the General Plan; to amend and restate
existing Development Agreement No. 2007-00002 to address a
proposed project re-design, including a revised product type and
site layout; to amend and restate existing Development Agreement
No. 2008-00002 to address a proposed project re-design, including
a revised product type, site layout, and increase in the number of
residential units while eliminating previously-approved commercial
and office area; to approve a tentative tract map to reflect the
redesign of both projects and the location of the proposed public
park.
Environmental Determination: Previously Certified Environmental
Impact Report No. 339 and Addendum No. 2 to Previously
Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 339.
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Vanessa Norwood
vnorwood@anaheim.net
Adjourn to Monday, December 17, 2012 at 5:00 p.m.
12/03/12
Page 6 of 7
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
4:30 p.m. November 28, 2012
(TIME) (DATE)
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK
SIGNED:
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to
all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or
national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate
alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and
regulations adopted in implementation thereof.
Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including
auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such
modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either
in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at
(714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled
meeting.
La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a
todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza ,
color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera
federal.
Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos
alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección
202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las
normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo.
Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo
medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar
dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria
de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o
por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la
reunión programada.
12/03/12
Page 7 of 7
S C H E D U L E
2012
December 17
December 31 (Cancelled)
C-GRETAIL
RM-2CONDOS53 DU
C-GSERVICESTATION
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERM-4FOURPLEX
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RM-4APTS8 DU
TMORTUARY
C-GVILLA CATALPAAPTS18 DU
RM-4TRIPLEX
C-GRETAIL
RM-4TRIPLEX
C-GRESTAURANT
RM-4THE VIRGINIAN APTS14 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RM-4TRIPLEX
RM-4GRAMERCY APARTMENTS66 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
C-GRETAIL
C-GMEDICAL OFFICE
RS-2DAY CARE
C-GRETAIL
C-GSERVICESTATION
RM-3DUPLEX RM-3TRIPLEX
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
C-GAUTO REPAIR/SERVICE
RM-3DUPLEXRS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERM-4FOURPLEX
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAILC-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL
RS-2SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCEN EUCLID STW LA PAL MA AVE
W CAT HER INE D RN MOHICAN AVEW FRANCIS DR
W CATA LPA D R
W DOG WOOD AV E N DRESDEN STW. LA PALMA AVE
N. EUCLID STN. BROOKHURST STN.
HARBOR BLVDN. LOARA STW. ROMNEYA DR
1 0 0 5 North Euc lid Street
D E V N o. 2012-00042
Subject Property APN: 272-141-13
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
N EUCLID STW LA PAL MA AVE
W CAT HER INE D RN MOHICAN AVEW FRANCIS DR
W CATA LPA D R
W DOG WOOD AV E N DRESDEN STW. LA PALMA AVE
N. EUCLID STN. BROOKHURST STN.
HARBOR BLVDN. LOARA STW. ROMNEYA DR
1 0 0 5 North Euc lid Street
D E V N o. 2012-00042
Subject Property APN: 272-141-13
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05602 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04905
(DEV2012-00042)
(1005 NORTH EUCLID STREET)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission the City Of Anaheim (“Planning
Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for a Conditional Use Permit and Variance to
permit and retain a truck rental facility within an existing check cashing business with fewer
parking spaces than permitted by the Anaheim Municipal Code on that certain .76-acre parcel of
land commonly known as 1005 North Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is developed with a commercial center and is located in the
Commercial General (CG) zone and is designated for General Commercial land uses in the
Anaheim General Plan; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on December 3, 2012 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed
conditional use permit and variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations
in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the conditional use permit request to permit a truck rental facility
within a check cashing facility in conjunction with an existing commercial center should be
denied for the following reasons:
1. The proposed conditional use permit to permit and retain a truck rental facility
would adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it is proposed to be located because the rear parking lot proposed for the parking of the
rental trucks is unsecured; the rental trucks are parked immediately adjacent to a six-foot high
block wall which abuts a residential property and due to the height of the trucks they are
prominently visible to the residents of the adjacent apartments thereby negatively affecting the
enjoyment of their property; further these trucks provide secluded areas that could provide cover
for illicit activities.
2. The size and shape of the site for the use is not adequate to allow the full
development of the truck rental facility in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to
the health and safety because 1) the trucks impede traffic circulation for other tenant businesses
in the center and for those travelling to the adjacent businesses to the north, 2) the size of the
property is inadequate to allow the use without creating the potential for criminal activity in the
- 2 - PC2012-***
rear parking lot which provides a secluded area on the north side of the parking lot conducive to
criminal behavior, 3) the rear parking lot provides an easy through access to other properties
which also contributes to the potential for criminal activity in the surrounding area, and 4) the
site is not large enough to allow the storage of vehicles to takle place in an area that is not
immediately adjacent to residential properties.
3. The granting of the conditional use permit would be detrimental to the health and
safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the truck rental facility does not integrate
into the commercial center without creating an increased potential for criminal activity and
further, the rear parking lot provides an easy through access to other properties which also
contributes to the potential for criminal and detrimental activity to the surrounding area.
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the parking variance has determined that the variance should be
denied for the following reasons:
1. That the variance will increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking
areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the parking of large rental vehicles in the rear
parking area occurs in a manner that partially obstructs traffic circulation in the rear drive aisle.
This drive aisle is often used by drivers to access the commercial property to the north. This
partial obstruction creates a potentially unsafe traffic condition.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby
deny Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05602 and Variance No. 2012-04905.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges
related to the processing of this discretionary case application within fifteen (15) days of the
issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the
approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting
of December 3, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter
18.60 (“Zoning Provisions - General”) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal
procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 3 - PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 4 - PC2012-***
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
November 12, 2012
City of Anaheim Planning Division 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Sub: Conditional Use Permit # 2012-05602 and variance # 2012-04905 Dear Sir/Madam 1. Rear parking of the premises is for customer parking only while doing business with exception of U-Haul parking. I is not a walk or drive through street. If safety of pedestrians or drive through is a concern than a fence can be put up to stop walking and drive through traffic. Francis Drive is connected to N. Euclid Street. U-Haul trucks are parked adjacent to W. Francis drive therefore are visible to anyone including police officer; driving by on this street. Please see P.P. Exhibit - 1 2. Dim Yellow lights have been replaced with bright white lights to provide adequate lighting. Please See P.P. Exhibit - 2. 3. Thanks to the city of Anaheim who has removed the marijuana dispensary next door. Proposed location of the truck can be changed if it makes it easier to monitor. 4. Other properties to the north are Walgreens drug Store and Arco gas station. They have direct access from La Palma and Euclid Street for their clients and monitoring by police. 5. Email from Muslim religion pizza place owner G. Malik located at 1001 N. Euclid St., Anaheim has false allegations therefore I reserve right to sue him in the civil court. There is no substantial proof for what he has claimed is really happening. Please see attached report obtained from the police. It shows that there is no drug or alcohol related crimes and illicit activity at this building since April 14, 2012. Thanks to Anaheim Police department’s good work. I am the victim of his personal vendetta. There are very long RVs parked overnight at the north side rear parking lot of this building. There are many construction trucks parked behind the building overnight constantly. See P.P. Exhibit - 1. Which he does not object to. Homeless people cannot live inside the U-Haul trucks as I keep padlock on the back doors? Trucks are park close so that there is no room for anyone to get between to do anything. See P.P. Exhibit 5 to 7. To best of my knowledge; looking at the
city records; he never applied or obtained a permit or conditional use permit to operate his dine in
restaurant. 6. Anaheim City is working very hard to improve the economy of the city by giving a chance to family owned and operated businesses which includes U-Haul dealership; thus contributing to financial growth of the city. Currently Anaheim city has permitted overnight parking for more than ten U-Haul dealers. These dealers have been serving do it yourself movers and their household. 7. It is easier to close someone’s business than give them an opportunity to earn a living. Without the income of U-Haul business I would not be able to pay rent resulting the closing of my business and my family on public assistance.
Sincerely Neeraj Nelson JNW World Inc., DBA. Check Cash & Pay Day Loan 1005 N. Euclid Street, Anaheim, CA 92801
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
Tel. (714) 772-4743, E-Mail: nnelson1@cox.net
Rear Parking Lot, P.P. Exhibit-1
W. Francis Drive RV, Chemical, Construction trucks stored all the time
Slide taking extra drive way and parking
P.P. Exhibit-2
Slide
Old and Yellow Lights
P.P. Exhibit-3
New and Bright Lights P.P. Exhibit-4
No room for human to get between P.P. Exhibit-5
No room for human to get between P.P. Exhibit-6
Master Lock on door
Lock
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
TVACANT
IINDUSTRIAL
RM-4APTS6 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2VACANT
RM-4APTS6 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RM-4FAY LANEAPTS8 DU
RM-4APTS8 DU
RM-4APTS12 DU
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RM-4APTS8 DU
RM-4APTS12 DU
RS-2VACANT
TSINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-2VACANT
TVACANT
W W A T E R S TW HAZELWOOD ST S
I
NDI
ANA STW FA Y LN
W S A N T A A N A S T
S WEST STS
I
LLI
NOI
S ST5
F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
S M
A
NCHESTER AVE
W. BALL RDS. EUCLID STW. BRO ADWAY
W. LINCOLN AVE
S. WALNUT STN. EUCLID STE . B R O A D W A Y
E . L IN C OL N AVES
.
HARBOR BLVDS.
ANAHEI
M BLVDS.
HARBOR BLVDS.
HARBOR BLVD5 0 1 Sou th Wes t Street
D E V N o. 2012-00117
Subject Property APN: 036-091-02
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
W W A T E R S TW HAZELWOOD ST S
I
NDI
ANA STW FA Y LN
W S A N T A A N A S T
S WEST STS
I
LLI
NOI
S ST5
F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
S M
A
NCHESTER AVE
W. BALL RDS. EUCLID STW. BRO ADWAY
W. LINCOLN AVE
S. WALNUT STN. EUCLID STE . B R O A D W A Y
E . L IN C OL N AVES
.
HARBOR BLVDS.
ANAHEI
M BLVDS.
HARBOR BLVDS.
HARBOR BLVD5 0 1 Sou th Wes t Street
D E V N o. 2012-00117
Subject Property APN: 036-091-02
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2012-00250 AND MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
(DEV2012-00117)
(501 SOUTH WEST STREET)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter
"Planning Commission") did receive a verified Petition for reclassification, designated as
Reclassification No. 2012-00250, for that certain real property located at 501 South West Street,
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit
A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is currently vacant and is located in the T (Transition)
Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Low-Density Residential land
uses; and
WHEREAS, the applicant requests to rezone the propert y from the T (Transition)
Zone to the RS-3 (Single-Family Residential) Zone; and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, the Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(“Procedures”) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against
said proposed Reclassification No. 2012-00250 and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission
finds and determines that proposed Reclassification No. 2012-00250 is within that class of
projects which consist of in-fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332
of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines"). Specifically, proposed
Reclassification No. 2012-00250 (a) is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation
and all applicable General Plan policies, as well as with applicable zoning designation and
regulations, (b) is no more than five acres in size substantially surrounded by urban uses, (c) has
no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (d) would not result in
significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (e) the Property can
be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Accordingly, pursuant to
Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, proposed Reclassification No. 2012-00250 will not
cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts:
- 2 - PC2012-***
1. Reclassification of the Property from the T (Transition) Zone to the RS-3
(Single-Family Residential) Zone is consistent with the property’s existing Low-Density
Residential General Plan land use designation.
2. The proposed reclassification of the Property is necessary and/or desirable
for the orderly and proper development of the community and is compatible with the properties
to the north, south, west, and east, which are designated for Low-Density Residential land uses.
Moreover, the proposed reclassification is compatible with the surrounding properties which are
developed with single-family homes.
3. The proposed reclassification of the Property does properly relate to the zone
and its permitted uses locally established in close proximity to the property and to the zones and
their permitted uses generally established throughout the community.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does
hereby unconditionally approve Reclassification No. 2012-00250 to authorize an amendment to
the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to rezone and reclassify the property into the
RS-3 (Single-Family Residential) Zone.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning
of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the Property; any such rezoning shall require an
ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied
by the City Council at its sole discretion.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of December 3, 2012.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 3 - PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 4 - PC2012-***
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2012-144 AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2012-00117)
(501 SOUTH WEST STREET)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning
Commission") did receive a verified Petition for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2012-144 to establish
a 3-lot residential subdivision to allow the future development of three single-family homes on
that certain 0.54-acre parcel of real property located at 501 South West Street in the City of
Anaheim, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is a vacant lot and is located in the T (Transitional)
zone. The Property is designated for Residential land uses in the City of Anaheim General Plan;
and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, the Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Tentative
Parcel Map 2012-144 to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, as the “lead agency” under the California Environmental Quality Act
(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning
Commission finds and determines that proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2012-144 is within that
class of projects which consist of in-fill development meeting the conditions described in Section
15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations ("CEQA Guidelines"). Specifically,
proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2012-144 (a) is consistent with the applicable General Plan
designation and all applicable General Plan policies, as well as with applicable zoning
designation and regulations, (b) is no more than five acres in size substantially surrounded by
urban uses, (c) has no value as a habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, (d) would not
result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (e) the
Property can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Accordingly,
pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines , proposed Tentative Parcel Map 2012-144
will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt
from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to permit a three-lot residential subdivision for
the future construction of three single family homes on the Property, does find and determine the
following facts:
- 2 - PC2012-***
1. That the proposed subdivision, including its design and improvements, is
consistent with the Low-Density Residential land use designation in the Anaheim General Plan
and the development standards contained in the RS-3 (Single-Family Residential) zone.
2. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed
residential subdivision.
3. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental
damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive
environmental habitat has been identified.
4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to
cause serious public health problems, since any new structures and associated site improvements
will be constructed on the property in compliance with Code requirements.
5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict
with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does
hereby approve proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2012-144, subject to the conditions of
approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to
preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions
of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided
(i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition
(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code, and (iii) the applicant has
demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations
on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations
of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's
compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition,
or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be
deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes
approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include
any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable
ordinance, regulation or requirement.
- 3 - PC2012-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all
charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the
issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the
approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of December 3, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (“Zoning Provisions - General”) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to
appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 4 - PC2012-***
- 5 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “B”
TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2012-144
(DEV2012-00117)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
GENERAL
1 Subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated
substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted
to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file
with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1, and as
conditioned herein.
Planning
2 No driveway openings will be permitted on Santa Ana Street. Planning
3 That all requests for new water services or fire lines, as well as any
modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water
services and fire lines, shall be coordinated through Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
Public
Utilities,
Water
Engineering
4 That if this is an individual homeowner project with a landscaping
area (including pools or other Water features) exceeding 5,000
square feet, a Landscape Documentation Package, a Certification of
Completion and a separate irrigation meter shall be installed in
compliance with Chapter 10.19 of Anaheim municipal Code and
Ordinance No. regarding water conservation.
Public
Utilities,
Water
Engineering
5 That all existing water services and fire services shall conform to
current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service
and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be
upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing
service is no longer needed. The owner/developer shall be
responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service
or fire line.
Public
Utilities,
Water
Engineering
6 That individual water service and/or fire line connections will be
required for each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit
per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and
Regulations.
Public
Utilities,
Water
Engineering
7 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL
listed meter, Hershey Residential Fire Meter with Translator
Register, no equals.
Public
Utilities,
Water
Engineering
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT
8 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property
owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to
establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system
plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and
related technical drawings and specifications.
Public
Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
- 6 - PC2012-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
9 If required, prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner
shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement
with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan.
Public
Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
10 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit
payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees.
Public
Utilities,
Electrical
Engineering
11 Prior to connection of any sewer lateral and prior to issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy, the developer shall remove the existing
terminal manhole and the first twelve (12) feet of existing sewer
line. The terminal manhole shall be reconstructed at the new
upstream end of the sewer line and 2 “stubb outs” from said
manhole shall be provided to serve the two (2) proposed northerly
parcels.
Public Works
Development
Services
12 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the recordation of a Save
Harmless in-lieu of Encroachment Agreement is required for any
private storm drains connecting to a City storm drain.
Public Works
Development
Services
13 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit to
the Public Works, Development Services the required street
improvement plans. The plans shall include the installation and
construction of landscape, irrigation, street lights, storm drain and
sewer improvements. The landscape and irrigation improvement
plans shall be prepared in accordance with the City Master Street
Tree Plan for Arterial Corridors, and Public Works Landscape and
Irrigation Manual for Public Street and Highway. The irrigation
shall be connected to the on-site water supply and a bond shall be
posted to guarantee the construction of all public works
improvements.
Public Works
Development
Services
14 All public improvements shall be completed by the developer and
accepted by the City prior to final building and zoning inspections. Public Works
Development
Services
PRIOR TO PARCEL MAP APPROVAL
15 Prior to parcel map approval, the developer shall irrevocably offer to
dedicate to the City of Anaheim a corner cut-off as an easement for
road, public utility and other public purposes.
Public Works
Development
Services
16 The parcel map shall be submitted for review and approval to the
City of Anaheim and the Orange County Surveyor and then shall be
recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Public Works
Development
Services
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
Subject Site – Looking Southwest
Subject Site – Looking South
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
Properties across Santa Ana – Looking Northeast
Properties across West Street - Looking Southeast
Properties across Santa Ana Looking Northwest
Properties across Santa Ana Looking North
Property to the West
Properties to the South
West Street Parkway
Santa Ana Parkway
West Street Curb
West Street Parkway
Santa Ana/West Street intersection
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
IVACANT
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
IINDUSTRIAL
BUSINESS PARK
IVOCATIONALSCHOOL
IOFFICES
IDELPHI BASEBALL FIELD
RS-2SINGLEFAMILY RESIDENCE
IMEDICAL OFFICE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
IVACANT IVACANT
IBUSINESS PARK
W VIAGONZALEZAVE
W AVONDAL E PL
5 F
R
EE
W
A
Y
N MAGNOLIA AVEW. LA PALMA AVE
N. MAGNOLIA AVEN. DALE AVEN. BROOKHURST ST. ORANGETHORPE AVE
1 2 5 6 North Magnolia Av enue
D E V N o. 2012-00116
Subject Property
APN: 071-062-01071-062-03
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
W VIAGONZALEZAVE
W AVONDAL E PL
5 F
R
EE
W
A
Y
N MAGNOLIA AVEW. LA PALMA AVE
N. MAGNOLIA AVEN. DALE AVEN. BROOKHURST ST. ORANGETHORPE AVE
1 2 5 6 North Magnolia Av enue
D E V N o. 2012-00116
Subject Property
APN: 071-062-01071-062-03
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ADOPTING A NEGATIVE
DECLARATION AND APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05633 AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2012-00116)
(1256 NORTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for
Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05633 to permit an indoor soccer/trampoline facility (the
"proposed project") on a portion of that certain real property located at 1256 North Magnolia
Avenue in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is part of an 11.75-acre industrial complex developed
with three industrial tenant spaces located in the Industrial (I) zone. The Property is designated
for General Commercial and Industrial land uses in the City of Anaheim General Plan; and
WHEREAS, a Negative Declaration (the "Negative Declaration") was prepared by
the City, in the form presented to the Planning Commission at this meeting, because an Initial Study
showed no substantial evidence that the proposed project may have a significant effect on the
environment; and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, the Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the proposed project
and the Negative Declaration, which was prepared in connection therewith, to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act
(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), this Planning
Commission has reviewed and considered the information contained in the Negative Declaration,
together with any comments received during the public review process, and finds and determines
that (i) the Negative Declaration is all that is necessary to serve as the required environmental
documentation in connection with the proposed project and the approval of the proposed project;
(ii) the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of this Planning Commission ;
and (iii) that there is no substantial evidence that the proposed project will have a significant
effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to permit an indoor soccer/trampoline facility,
does find and determine the following facts:
- 2 - PC2012-***
1. The proposed conditional use permit request to permit an indoor soccer/trampoline
facility within an existing industrial building tenant space is properly one for which a conditional
use permit is authorized under Code Section Nos. 18.10.030.010 (Recreation - Commercial
Indoor) of the Code.
2. The proposed conditional use permit to permit an indoor soccer/trampoline facility
within an existing industrial building tenant space, as conditioned herein, would not adversely
affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located because the building is surrounded by compatible buildings and uses; and, the
indoor soccer/trampoline facility would be located within an existing building with no adverse
affects to adjoining land uses.
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of
the indoor soccer/trampoline facility in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the
health and safety because the facility would be located within an existing industrial building
tenant space.
4. The traffic generated by the an indoor soccer/trampoline facility will not impose an
undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic
on the surrounding streets and adequate parking will be provided to accommodate the use.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed land
use will continue to be integrated with the surrounding commercial and industrial area and would
not pose a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does
hereby approve and adopt the Negative Declaration and Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-
05633, subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval
may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing
for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a
showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original
intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the
use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations
on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations
of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
- 3 - PC2012-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's
compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition,
or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be
deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes
approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the
City of Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does
not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any
other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all
charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the
issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the
approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of December 3, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (“Zoning Provisions - General”) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to
appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 4 - PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 5 - PC2012-***
- 6 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05633
(DEV2012-00116)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
1 The entire parking lot shall be re-slurried and restriped.
Parking lot striping shall be provided, per City Standard
Detail No. 470. Disabled parking spaces shall be provided
in accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and
City Standard Detail No. 436-G. The re-slurry and
restriping improvements shall be shown on plans submitted
for building permits and installed prior to occupancy of the
proposed use.
Planning
2 The chain-link fencing and gates along the front of the
property, the south property line, the north property line and
the chain-link fence separating the front and rear parking lot
areas shall be removed. If necessary, the applicant shall
install new fencing along the north property line as approved
by Planning Department Division and as allowed by the
Zoning Code. The removal of the chain-link fencing/gates
and new fencing improvements shall be shown on plans
submitted for building permits and installed prior to
occupancy of the proposed use.
Planning
3 A trash enclosure shall be constructed meeting the
requirements of the Department of Public Works Streets and
Sanitation Division. Also, vines shall be provided around the
trash enclosure to deter graffiti. The enclosure shall be
shown on plans submitted for building permits and installed
prior to occupancy of the proposed use.
Planning
4 A sign plan must be reviewed and approved for all proposed
business signs. Planning
5 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application,
Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior
to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the
Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded
from the following web site:
http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678
Police
6 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily
readable from the street. Number should be illuminated
during hours of darkness. Rear entrance doors shall be
numbered with the same address numbers or suite number of
the business. Minimum height of 4” recommended.
Police
7 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g.
deadbolt locks. Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing
device should be installed in solid doors where natural
surveillance is compromised. The locks shall be so
constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can
be retracted by a single action of the inside
Police
- 7 - PC2012-***
doorknob/lever/turn piece. Overhead roll-up doors shall
also be secured on the inside that the lock cannot be defeated
from the outside and shall be secured with a cylinder lock or
padlock from the inside.
8 Proper exterior parking lot lighting shall be provided.
Provide a lighting plan showing the type of lighting to be
provided to ensure the parking lot will be well lit.
Monument signs and addresses shall be well lit during hours
of darkness. Adequate lighting of parking lots,
passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings
shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to
provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises during the
hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for
all person, property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors
shall have their own light source, which shall adequately
illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises and provide
adequate illumination for persons exiting the building.
The lighting in the parking lot shall be maintained in proper
working order and remain illuminated during hours of
darkness.
The afterhours lighting in the parking area shall be on a
dimming control system and remain lit within the 50-80%
reduction allowances until daylight hours.
Outdoor Full cut off wall pack fixtures shall be added to
each side of the building’s exterior and be illuminated during
hours of darkness.
Lighting improvements shall be shown on plans submitted
for building permits and installed prior to occupancy of the
proposed use.
Planning/
Police
9 The existing landscaped planters throughout the site,
including the front setback area shall be upgraded to include
new planting material and shall be properly irrigated and
maintained. Overgrown vegetation throughout the property
shall be cleaned up and maintained in a well groomed
manner. The landscaping improvements shall be shown on
plans submitted for building permits and installed prior to
occupancy of the proposed use.
Planning/
Police
10 Landscaping shall be significantly cut back or reduced and
maintained in a manner that allows for any person or vehicle
to be easily observed from the building and/or surrounding
properties. Additionally, no landscaping shall interfere with
installed lighting fixtures so as to reduce or block adequate
lighting from reaching its intended location.
Police
- 8 - PC2012-***
Landscaping along North property line shall be cut back or
removed to allow for fencing installation or repair. This will
prevent unwanted access to or from the railroad property by
people or vehicles.
Landscaping along the East property line shall be cut back or
reduced to allow for safe passage of pedestrians and to
eliminate or reduce the opportunity for persons to loiter
unobserved.
These landscaping improvements shall be completed prior to
occupancy of the proposed use.
11 An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be designed,
installed and maintained as required by the Fire Department. Fire
12 A fire alarm system shall be designed, installed and
maintained as required by the Fire Department. The alarm
system shall be shown on plans submitted for building
permits and installed prior to occupancy of the proposed use.
Fire
13 That all backflow equipment shall be located above ground
outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened
from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies
currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to
current standards. Any other large water system equipment
shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering
Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully
screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information
shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water
Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector.
Water
Engineering
14 If continued use of the existing 2” water meter serving the
property is required, a lead-free backflow prevention device,
meeting the City of Anaheim’s standards, shall be installed
prior to final occupancy. Otherwise the meter and service
shall be abandoned per City of Anaheim standards.
Water
Engineering
GENERAL
15 The hours of operation for the indoor soccer/trampoline
facility shall be Monday through Sunday: 10:00 a.m. to
10:00 p.m. Changes to the Operational Plan and Parking
Study are subject to review and approval by the Planning
Director and shall be based on the demonstrated availability
of an adequate number of parking spaces to support any
requested operational change.
Planning
16 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of
Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with
the Planning Division marked Exhibit No. 1 and 2 (Site Plan
and Floor Plans), and as conditioned herein.
Planning
- 9 - PC2012-***
17 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any
adjacent area under the control of the property owner shall
be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being
applied.
Code
Enforcement
18 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area
adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an
orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance
and removal of trash or debris.
Planning/
Code
Enforcement
19 All activities related to the use shall occur indoors, except as
may be permitted by an authorized Special Event Permit.
Planning/
Code
Enforcement
20 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise
enclosed for outdoor storage.
Planning/
Code
Enforcement
ULTIMATE LEAGUE SOCCER
• JUMP PARK USA •
Letter of Operation
The proposed project (Ultimate League Soccer and Jump Park USA) is located at 1256 N.
Magnolia Blvd. in Anaheim. The venue is intended to further bolster Anaheim’s reputation as a
premier city for world-class sports and family recreation. Ultimate League Soccer and Jump
Park USA will be a family-oriented recreational facility and family fun center providing a state
of the art indoor trampoline and indoor soccer complex. The owners intend to complement the
City’s existing youth entertainment and sports programs by providing a safe environment for
families interested in clean and healthy activities. Jump Park USA will provide an outlet for
Anaheim youth to engage in safe and healthy after school activities. The soccer portion of the
operation will contain approximately 7 soccer fields and 2 soccer fitness/practice areas. The
facility will also include offices, locker facilities, and restrooms, as well as a vending machine
and snack bar area. The restrooms and snack areas will be shared by the soccer and
trampoline uses and no food will be prepared on the premises. The trampoline portion of the
operation will consist of trampoline areas, dodgeball (dodgeball played on trampolines) area,
basketball slam-dunk area, foam pit and bungee jump area among other activities for the
youth of 4-17 years of age. The facility will also include seating areas for spectators, birthday
parties and other celebrations. The operation of the proposed project is outlined below.
Proposed Operations
Monday through Sunday: 10:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m.
For the indoor soccer, each team would have a maximum of 6 players (5 players and 1 sub)
and it’s estimated that there would be up to 84 soccer players at peak weekday and weekend
times, plus 5 staff members. In addition, it is anticipated that soccer tournaments would occur
once every three to four months on the project site on a weekend. It’s estimated that there
would be 112 players, 28 spectators, and 8 staff members during the peak times of the soccer
tournaments.
It is estimated that there would be 150 customers in the trampoline area (including
parents/guardians who come with children) and 9 staff members during peak weekday times.
Peak activity will occur late afternoon and early evenings when the parking areas are the least
utilized by the warehouse/industrial uses. The peak weekend time for the indoor jump park
would occur early and late afternoons (Saturday). It is anticipated that there will be 240
customers in the trampoline area (including parents/guardians who come with the children)
and 14 staff members during this peak time.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Front of Building (North Side of Building)
Parking Lot
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
Rear of Building (East Side of Building)
Entrance (West Side of Building)
Adjacent Building
Inside Building
Nearby Property (West of Project Site – Northgate)
Nearby Property (South of Project Site – Talbert Medical Office)
Nearby Property (South of Project Site – American Career College)
Nearby Property (East of Project Site)
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
8 PARKING30 PARKING
25 PARKING
28 PARKING
23 PARKING10 PARKING
6 PARKING
18 PARKING
16 PARKING
19 PARKING14 PARKING11 PARKING23 PARKING 19 PARKING
37 PARKING124'-7"
FWSP
CONC
CONC
CLF .5' OUT
WICKES SIGN OVER HEAD
62'-6"37'-8"68,580 SF
CONC TILT-UP BLDG
FURNITURE SHOWROOM
AND WAREHOUSE
99,650 SF
CONC TILT-UP BLDG
INDOOR
AMUSEMENT8'-2"29'-6"8'-8
"
30 PARKING
19'-3"22'
-
0
"
20
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
9 PARKING 14 PARKING
11 PARKING8 PARKING6 PARKINGSIGN
PB
CB
5 PARKINGM A G N O L I A A V E N U E9 PARKING39,400 SF
CONC TILT-UP BLDG
WAREHOUSE18'-3"18'-3"25 PARKING
43 PARKING6 PARKING
33'-8"ACCESS RAMP40'-0"399'-10"249'-4"45 PARKINGBUILDING DEPARTMENT NOTES
SCOPE OF WORK: CONVERSION OF SF OF EXISTING TILT-UP BUILDING TO
INDOOR SOCCER AND TRAMPOLINE FACILITY
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.:
CODES USED:2010-CBC, C.P.C, C.M.C., C.E.C.,C.F.C.,C.G.C. AND CA ENERGY
CODE AS AMENDED BY STATE OF CALIFORNIA AND CITY OF FULLERTON ARE
APPLICABLE TO THIS PROJECT
OCCUPANCY CLASSIFICATION:
A-3 (AMUSEMENT)SEC. 303
M (MERCANTILE)SEC. 309
S-1 (STORAGE) SEC. 311
SEPARATION:A-3/M ONE HOUR
M/S-1 NONE T-508.4
CONSTRUCTION TYPE:
I-A/ WITH AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEM T-601
ALLOWABLE AREAS/ FLOORS/ HEIGHT: T-503
A-3 UL / UL
M UL / UL
S-1 UL / UL
EXISTING/PROPOSED AREA =99,650 SF
NUMBER OF STORIES: ONE
OCCUPANT LOAD:
SEE DRAWINGS 360
A-3 99,650 /360 = 278 SF/PERSONTOTAL
EXITS REQUIRED: T-1021.1 EXITS PROVIDED:
A-3/ FIRST FLOOR 99,650 SF< 500 = TWO =FOUR
TRAVEL DISTANCE: T-1061.1
PLUMBING FIXTURES ANALYSIS
OCCUPANT LOAD PER T-A CPC
GROUP "A"OCCUPANTS= 360 = 180 MEN / 180 WOMEN
PLUMBING FIXTURES PER T-4-2 / CPC
WC U LAV D.F.M W M M W .REQUIRED 2 4 2 1 1 2
PROVIDED 4 4 2 2 2 2
THESE NUMBERS ARE FOR BUILDING DEPT. USE ONLY AND ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR BIDDING OR CONSTRUCTION
PARKING SPACES REQUIRED :SPORTS ARENA PARKING1.95x99650/1000 = 196
FURNITURE STORE PARKING2.25X34290/1000 + 1.55X34290/10 = 130
WAREHOUSE PARKING1.55X39400/1000 = 61
TOTAL = 387
TOTAL PROVIDED = 512 PARKING
No. C 16997LICENSED ARCHITE
C
T
GEORG E BE
H
NAMS
T
ATE
OF
CA L IF O R NIANOT
V
A
LID
WI T HO U T W E T S IGNATURER
E
: 09-3 0 -2 0 13A R C H I T E C TGEORGE BEHNAM, AIAE-mail : GBehnam@sbcglobal.netPLACENTIA, CA 928701150 E. ORANGETHORPE # 109IS PROHIBITED EXCEPT BY WRITTEN PERMISSION FROM THE ARCHITECT.USE AND PUBLICATION SHALL BE RESTRICTED TO THE ORIGINAL SITE THEYWERE PREPARED. REUSE, REPRODUCTION OR PUBLICATION BY ANY MEANS THIS SERVICE, ARE THE EXCLUSIVE PROPERTY OF THE ARCHITECT, THEIRTHESE DRAWINGS AND ACCOMPANYING SPECIFICATIONS, AS INSTRUMENTS OF(714)572-2384FAX(714)572-2385CHECKED BY:
SHEET TITLE:
DATE :
SCALE:
DRAWN BY :
PROJECT NO:
CAD DWG FILE:
DATE
REVISIONS
1 OF 2
SP
-
PLAN
SITEULTIMATE LEAGUE SOCCERNEW SPORTS ARENA1256 N. MAGNOLIA AVEANAHEIM, CA 92804o JUMP PARK USA NEW SPORTS ARENA1256 N. MAGNOLIA ANAHEIM, CA 928041208045
120805
GB
GB
NOTED
08-25-2012
ULTIMATE LEAUGE SOCCER
JUMP PARK USA
1256 N. MAGNOLIA AVE.
ANAHEIM, CA 92804
- 1-
CITY OF ANAHEIM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
Form Revision Date: 12/20/2005
CASE NO.: Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05633
SITE ADDRESS: 1256 N. Magnolia, Anaheim, CA 92801
ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED:
The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one Impact that is a
"Potentially Significant Impact" as indicated by the checklist on the following pages.
Aesthetic/Visual Agricultural Resources Air Quality
Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology/Soils
Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology/Water Quality Land Use/Planning
Mineral Resources Noise Population/Housing
Public Services Recreation Transportation/Traffic
Utilities/Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance
DETERMINATION: (To be completed by the City)
On the basis of this initial evaluation:
I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE
DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a
significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project
proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required.
I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant Impact” or “potentially significant unless
mitigated” Impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier
document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on
the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required,
but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed.
I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all
potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE
DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that
earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon
the proposed project, nothing further is required.
____________________________________ _________________
Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date
Andy Nogal, Associate Planner__________ (714) 765-4568_______________
Printed Name/Title Phone No.
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
- 2-
EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS:
1) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including offsite as well as onsite, cumulative
as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational Impacts.
2) A list of “Supporting Information Sources” must be attached and other sources used or individuals
contacted should be cited in the Narrative Summary for each section.
3) Response Column Heading Definitions:
a) Potentially Significant Impact is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be
significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination
is made, an EIR is required.
b) Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated applies where the incorporation of
mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than
Significant Impact”. The mitigation measures must be described, along with a brief explanation of
how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level.
c) Less Than Significant Impact applies where the project creates no significant Impacts, only Less
Than Significant Impacts.
d) No Impact applies where a project does not create an Impact in that category. A “No Impact”
answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the Impact simply
does not apply to projects like the one proposed (e.g., the project falls outside of a fault rupture zone).
A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors as well as
general standards (e.g., the project will not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a
project-specific screening analysis).
4) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to a tiering, program EIR, Master EIR, or other CEQA
process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration (Section
15062(c)(3)(D)). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following:
a) Earlier Analysis Used. Identify and state where they are available for review.
b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the checklist were within the scope of and
adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether
such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis.
c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures
Incorporated”, describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier
document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project.
5) Incorporate into the checklist any references to information sources for potential Impacts (e.g., the General
Plan, zoning ordinance). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where
appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated.
6) The explanation of each issue should identify:
a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and
b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the Impact to less than significant.
- 3-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
I. AESTHETICS -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista?
No Impact. The proposed indoor soccer/trampoline facility is not adjacent to any scenic vista.
b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to,
trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildi ngs within a State scenic
highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic
highway?
No Impact. The project consists of an indoor soccer/trampoline facility in an existing industrial building and will not damage
scenic resources because it is not adjacent to a scenic vista or scenic highway .
c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the
site and its surroundings?
No Impact. The project consists of an indoor soccer/trampoline facility in an existing industrial building and will not degrade
the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings.
d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would
adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement to an existing industrial building. Exterior lighting will be limited to
typical parking lot and building security lighting provided in conformance with City standards. All lighting wil l be directed on-
site to eliminate potential glare issues.
II. AGRICULTURE RESOURCES -- In determining whether Impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental
effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared
by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing Impacts on agriculture and farmland.
Would the project:
a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of
Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared
pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the
California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use?
No Impact. The project site is identified as “urban and built -up land” on the 2010 Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program
map for Orange County.
b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act
contract?
No Impact. The project site is not subject to any California Land Conservation A ct (Williamson Act).
c) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their
location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non -
agricultural use?
No Impact. No Impacts to agricultural resources would result from the proposal to establish an indoor soccer/trampoline
facility because the project is located in an existing industrial building and is not located in an agricultural area.
III. AIR QUALITY -- Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air
pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project:
a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality
plan?
- 4-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No Impact. The project site is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). The SoCAB has been designated as a
non-attainment area as the area does not meet National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for certain pollutants
regulated under the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA). The SoCAB fails to meet national standards for ozone (O3), (Particulate
Matter) PM10, and PM2.5, and therefore is considered a Federal “non -attainment” area for these pollutants. The South Coast
Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) is required, pursuant to the Federal Clean Air Act, to reduce emissions of criteria
pollutants for which the SoCAB is in non-attainment. The project would be subject to the SCAQMD’s 2007 Air Quality
Management Plan (AQMP). The AQMP contains a comprehensive list of pollution control strategies directed at reducing
emissions and achieving ambient air quality standards. These strategies are developed, in part, based on regional
population, housing, and employment projections prepared by the Southern Californ ia Association of Governments (SCAG).
SCAG is the regional planning agency for Orange County and addresses regional issues relating to transportation, the
economy, community development, and the environment. SCAG prepares the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP), which
forms the basis of the land use and transportation control portions of the AQMP. SCAG’s RTP is utilized in the preparation of
the air quality forecasts and the air quality consistency analysis that is included in the AQMP.
A project is consistent with the AQMP if it is consistent with the population, housing and employment assumptions which were
used in the development of the AQMP. The 2007 AQMP, the most recent AQMP adopted by the SCAQMD, incorporates
SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) socioeconomic forecast projections of regional population and employment
growth. The project would not affect AQMP projections in population growth as the project is consistent with the growth
anticipated under the city’s General Plan. Because the pro ject is consistent with the SCAQMD’s projections incorporated into
the AQMP, it can be concluded that the project would be consistent with the projections in the AQMP. Based on the above
discussion, implementation of the project would result in no impact related to implementation of the applicable air quality
plans.
b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located within the South Coast Air Quality Basin which is characterized by
relatively poor air quality and is a Federal and State designated non -attainment area for O3 (Ozone), PM2.5 (Particulate
Matter, fine particles 2.5 microns diameter or smaller found in all types of combustion activities (motor vehicles, power plants,
wood burning, etc) and PM10 (particular matter of both fine and coarse dust particles larger than 2.5 microns, but smaller
than 10 microns in diameter (USEPA2007b). SCAQMD has established significance thresholds for both construction and
operational activities relative to these criteria pollutants.
The proposed project proposes interior tenant improvements and minimal exterior improvements
involving refurbishment of an existing parking lot and landscap ing. General construction activities,
such as travel by construction workers can contribute to air pollutants. All construction activities would
comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding the control of fugitive dust emissions and existing City of
Anaheim dust suppression practices that minimize dust and other emissions . However, because the
project does not involve grading or excavation activities, it is anticipated that any construction -related
air quality impacts would be less than significant.
Operational related Impacts are typically associated with emissions produced from project -generated
vehicle trips. The proposed project will minimally increase the number of vehicles trips to this location
and would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds.
Based on the above standard measures and project size, construction and operational activities would be less than
significant.
c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an
applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including
releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors)?
- 5-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No Impact. Any project which contributes a cumulatively considerable Impact net increase of any criteria pollutant for which
the region is in non-attainment would result in a cumulatively significant Impact. The project is located within a Federal and
State designated nonattainment area for O3, PM2.5, and PM10 and is in attainment/maintenance for CO (carbon monoxide)
and NO2 (nitrogen dioxide). Based upon the limits of construction, project construction pollutants are not expected to exceed
construction-related Thresholds of Significance listed in SCAQMD’s 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook, and therefore will not
result in a cumulatively considerable Impact net increase of a nonattainment criteria pollutant.
As stated previously, operational Impacts are typically associated with emissions produced from project-generated vehicle
trips. Motor vehicles and vehicle idling are a major source of O3 precursors, particularly when a vehicle is forced to remain
motionless because of adverse traffic conditions. However, the proposed project operational emissions are not expected to
exceed the operational Thresholds of Significance listed in SCAQMD’s 1993 CEQA Air Quality Handbook , and therefore, will
not contribute to a cumulatively considerable Impact of any criteria pollutant for which the region is in non -attainment.
d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations?
No Impact. Sensitive receptors located near the project site are residents located approximately 400 feet to the north of the
project site. Since emissions from construction and operation are predicted to be less than significant, and the work is to be
conducted indoors, no significant Impact is expected to impact the sensitive receptors.
e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people?
No Impact. No objectionable odors are expected as a result of the project. The proposed project does not involve the use of
chemicals or products that can create objectionable odors .
IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directl y or through habitat
modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or
special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations,
or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service?
No Impact. The proposal consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial building and will be compatible with the
surrounding area. No candidate, sensitive or special status species have been identified onsite.
b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other
sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans,
policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game
or US Fish and Wildlife Service?
No Impact. The project is located on an 11.75-acre lot and is developed with three tenants spaces measuring 207,630
square feet. The proposal consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial building and does not contain or is not
adjacent to any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community.
c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as
defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not
limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal,
filling, hydrological interruption, or other means?
No Impact. There are no wetlands on the project site.
d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or
migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or
migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery
sites?
No Impact. The project site is an existing industrial property and will not substantially interfere with the movement of any
native resident.
e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological
resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance?
No Impact No tree preservation requirements exist upon the subject site.
f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted H abitat Conservation Plan,
Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local,
regional, or State habitat conservation plan?
- 6-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No Impact. The project site is not located in the Orange County Central and Coastal Natural Community Natura l Community
Conservation Plan/Habitat Conservation Plan.
V. CULTURAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines
and/or identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim
Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (July 20, 1999)?
Less Than Significant Impact. The site is not located in the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan.
b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA
Guidelines?
No Impact. The project site is in an industrial setting and has been developed with three industrial tenant spaces. The
project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and no grading activities are expected.
c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site
or unique geologic feature?
No Impact. The proposed project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space. No unique
paleontological resources or geologic features are evident .
d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries?
No Impact. The project site is in an industrial setting and has been developed three industrial tenant spaces. The project
consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and no grading activities are expected.
VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS -- Would the project:
a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects,
including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving:
i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most
recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State
Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a
known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special
Publication 42.
ii) Strong seismic ground shaking?
No Impact. The State Department of Conservation has not identified any Alquist -Priolo Earthquake fault zones in the City of
Anaheim. The closest active fault zone is the Whittier Fault which is located outside of the City of Anaheim and north of the
City’s northeast limits.
iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction?
No Impact. The State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map, (Anaheim Quadrangle, April 15, 1998), indicates that the
project site is not subject to historical occurrences of liquefaction.
iv) Landslides?
No Impact. The State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map, (Anaheim Quadrangle, April 15, 1998), indicates that the
project site is not subject to historical occurrences of landslides.
b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil?
No Impact. The site is currently developed with three industrial tenant spaces and mature landscaping. The proposed tenant
improvement in an existing industrial tenant space will not result in substantial soil erosion or loss of topsoil.
c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would
become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on -
or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or
collapse?
- 7-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the
Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or
property?
No Impact (c and d). The project site is located in an area with unstable or expansive soils that could result in liquefaction,
collapse or risks to life or property. However, the proposed project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial
building with no new construction. Therefore, the proposed project will not increase the likelihood of the property becoming
unstable resulting in loss of property or loss of life.
e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic
tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not
available for the disposal of wastewater?
No Impact. The project will tie into the existing sewer system; septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems are
not part of this project.
VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project:
a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that
may have a significant impact on the environment?
Less Than Significant Impact. Recent State legislation, such as AB32 and SB375, have set statewide goals for decreasing
greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions thereby necessitating a discussion of this project’s potential impacts to global climate
change and GHG emissions. Per AB32 and SB375, an association between the combustion of fossil fuels, wh ich results in
CO2, and an increase in global warming, has been identified. CO2 is the major contributor of GHGs; other GHGs include
fluorocarbons, methane, and nitrous oxide. OPR’s Guidelines state that “such emissions from CEQA projects must be
disclosed and mitigated to the extent feasible whenever the lead agency determines that the project contributes to a
significant, cumulative climate change impact.” However, a significant, cumulative climate change impact is not anticipated
as a result of this project’s scale. In comparison to “greenfield” or traditional suburban development, the infill nature of the
project will help reduce the number and length of vehicle trips associated with this development due to the site’s proximity to
local employment centers, housing, shopping and entertainment venues, and public transit facilities.
Short-term construction related GHG emissions would include emissions from construction activities. Construction of the
project would result in direct emissions of carbon di oxide (CO2), nitrous oxides (N2O), and methane (CH4) from operation of
construction equipment. Transport of materials and construction workers to and from the project site would also result in
GHG emissions. Construction activities would be short term in duration and would cease upon project completion.
Therefore, GHG emissions from construction of the project would likely be minimal and would not hinder the GHG reduction
goals of AB 32 and SB 375. Therefore, a less than significant impact would occur.
Long-term operations of the proposed project are not anticipated to result in a significant increase in operational GHG
emissions. Due to the complex physical, chemical, and atmospheric mechanisms involved in global climate change, there is
no basis for concluding that the project's very small theoretical emissions increase could actually cause a measurable
increase in global GHG emissions necessary to influence global climate change. Any future industrial project will utilize
modern construction standards, including those contained within the recently-enacted California Green Building Code, that
are largely aimed at ensuring the efficient use of water and energy resources for the new residences. As indicated in Sectio n
III above, the projected short and long term impacts upon air quality are significantly below the significance thresholds
established by SCAQMD. Because of this, it can be assumed that the project greenhouse gas emissions generated by the
project, either directly or indirectly, will not h ave a significant impact on the environment.
Therefore, due to the incremental amount of GHG emissions theoretically assumed for a future industrial project, the lack of
any evidence for concluding that the project's GHG emissions could cause any measurab le increase in global GHG
emissions necessary to force global climate change, and the fact that the project incorporates design features to reduce
potential GHG emissions, the project is considered not to hinder the goals of AB32. Therefore, impacts to ai r quality in this
regard would be less than significant.
b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the
purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases?
No Impact. The project will not conflict with any plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions
of greenhouse gases. Further, the emissions resulting from the construction and operation of the project are projected to be
well below established thresholds of significance related to air pollutants, including CO2 which is major contributor of
greenhouse gases.
- 8-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS -- Would the project:
a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space. The project will not result in a
significant hazard to the public through the routine transport, use, or di sposal of hazardous materials.
b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through
reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the
release of hazardous materials into the environment?
No Impact. No hazardous materials will be stored on site.
c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous
materials, substances, or waste within one -quarter mile of an existing or
proposed school?
No Impact. The proposed project is a tenant improvement and will not emit any hazardous emissions or wastes.
d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the
public or the environment?
No Impact. The project site is not listed in the State’s Department of Toxic Substances Control list of hazardous waste sites.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos
Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the
project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the
project area?
No Impact. The project site is located approximately 1.2 miles from the Fullerton Municipal Airport, however it is not in the
path of airplane take-offs or landings. The project site is not located within a Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) or the Accident
Protection Zone II (APZII) which extend 500 feet from the runway in every direction as identified in the C ity of Fullerton
General Plan Program EIR (Section 5.9 - Hazards and Hazardous Materials) as shown in Appendix A.
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or
helistop, would the project result in a safety hazard for people res iding
or working in the project area?
No Impact. The project site is located approximately 1.2 miles from the Fullerton Municipal Airport and Helistop . The project
site is not located within a Runway Protection Zone (RPZ) or the Accident Prot ection Zone II (APZII) which extend 500 feet
from the runway in every direction as identified in the City of Fullerton General Plan Program EIR (Section 5.9 - Hazards and
Hazardous Materials) as shown in Appendix A.
g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted
emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan?
h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to
urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands?
No Impact (g and h). The site is located within an established industrial property which is not adjacent to any wildlands area;
therefore, the project will not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wil dland fires.
IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY -- Would the project:
a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and, will not violate any water
quality standards or waste discharge During demolition activities and tenant improvement activities, the contractor is
required to comply with Chapter 10.09 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, which prohibits the active or passive discharge or
disposal of soil or construction debris into the storm drain . Therefore, no significant Impact would result. No operational
Impacts are expected.
- 9-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially
with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in
aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g.,
the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level
which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which
permits have been granted)?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and, will not result in a
substantial depletion of groundwater supplies or interfere with groundwater recharge activity.
c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a
manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-
site?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and, will not result in the
alteration of existing drainage pattern of the site or the area. No streams or rivers are located within the project area, and
therefore, implementation of the project will not result in erosion or siltation.
d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area,
including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or
substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner
which would result in flooding on- or off-site?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space. No changes in runoff are
anticipated.
e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of
existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial
additional sources of polluted runoff?
f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality?
No Impact (e and f). The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space, and therefore, will
not create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existi ng or planned stormwater drainage systems,
substantially degrade water quality or contribute to excessive runoff water.
g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a
federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other
flood hazard delineation map?
h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would
impede or redirect flood flows?
No Impact (g and h). According to FEMA’s Flood Insurance Rate Map (Panel No. 0109 December 3, 2009), the project is
located in Zone X and not within the 100-year flood hazard area.
i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or
death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a
levee or dam?
No Impact. The project is not located in a flood hazard area and according to the Dam Inundation Map contained in the
Safety Element of the City of Anaheim’s General Plan (2004), this project is not located within any areas of dam inundation,
and therefore would not expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding.
j) Expose persons or structures to risk of inundation by seiche or
mudflow?
No Impact. The site is located in an industrial zone and not within the vicinity of bodies of water that expose persons or
structures to risk of inundation by seiche or mudflow.
k) Substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from
areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fuelin g, vehicle or
equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling,
hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks
or other outdoor work areas?
- 10-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
l) Substantially degrade water quality by discharge which affects the
beneficial uses (i.e., swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or
downstream waters?
No Impact (k and l). The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will not result in
a decrease of water quality.
X. LAND USE AND PLANNING -- Would the project:
a) Physically divide an established community?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and is consistent with the
surrounding industrial community.
b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an
agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the
general plan, specific plan or zoning ordinance) adopted for the
purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space which is consistent with the
existing commercial land use designation of the General Plan, and therefore, will not conflict with any applicable land use plan
or policy.
c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural
community conservation plan?
No Impact. The project is not located within a Natural Communities Conservation plan (NCCP)/Habitat Conservation Plan
(HCP) area and will not conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan .
XI. MINERAL RESOURCES -- Would the project:
a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that
would be of value to the region and the residents of the state?
b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral
resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan
or other land use plan?
No Impact (a and b). The Mineral Resources Map of Program EIR No. 330 prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code
update (May 2004), indicates there are no mineral resources located near the project vicinity.
XII. NOISE -- Would the project result in:
a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of
standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or
applicable standards of other agencies?
Less Than Significant Impact. The tenant improvement and parking lot refurbishment construction phase of the project
(equipment, construction traffic, etc.) would result in short -term noise Impacts to the adjacent industrial community. Chapter
6.70 of Anaheim City’s Municipal Code exempts construction noise during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. and the
contractor will be required to comply with standards stated in this chapter.
b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne
vibration or groundborne noise levels?
Less Than Significant Impact. Industrial uses, recreational and medical uses surround the project site to west and south, a
church ministry to the East and Interstate 5 Freeway to the north. The tenant improvement and parking lot refurbishment
construction phase and associated construction equipment could produce vibration from vehicle construction activities.
However, construction activities will be limited to daytime hours from 7:00 am to 7:00 pm. Operational activities will not result
in the generation of excessive vibration or groundborne noise and will not expose persons to excessive ground noise.
c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels
in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project?
- 11-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
No Impact (c and d). The proposed tenant improvement of an existing industrial tenant space and refurbishment of an
existing parking lot would not expose people to a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels . Construction
activities will result in a temporary periodic increase in ambient noise levels, however, the City exem pts noise generated by
construction activities between the hours of 7:00 am to 7:00 pm, and the project would comply with this Municipal Code
(Chapter 6.70) requirement.
e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos
Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the
project expose people residing or working in the project area to
excessive noise levels?
f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or
helistop, would the project expose people residing or working in the
project area to excessive noise levels?
No Impact (e and f). The project is located within 1.2 miles of the Fullerton Airport, however Fullerton Airport/Helicopter
Noise Abatement Procedures call for the strict adherence of flight paths, use of best rate of climb and low RPM’s and other
measures to mitigate noise over sensitive areas as shown in Appendix B - Fullerton Airport Noise Abatement Procedures and
Appendix C - City of Fullerton General Plan Program EIR (Section 5.6 - Noise).
XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING -- Would the project:
a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for
example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for
example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)?
b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere?
No Impact (a-c). The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and does not expand
the number of dwelling units within the City of Anaheim. The proposed use would not result in either an increase in housing
units or population.
XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES -- Would the project result in substantial adverse physical Impacts associated with the provision of
new or physically altered governmental facilities, the constru ction of which could cause significant environmental Impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services:
Fire protection?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will not expand the
number of dwelling units.
Police protection?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will not expand the
number of dwelling units.
Schools?
Parks?
Other public facilities?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will not expand the
number of dwelling units or the need for additional public services .
XV. RECREATION -- Would the project:
a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration
of the facility would occur or be accelerated?
- 12-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion
of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on
the environment?
No Impact (a-b). The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will not create an
adverse impact or need for additional recreational facilities.
XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC -- Would the project:
a) Cause an increase in traffic which is substantial in relation to the
existing traffic load and capacity of the street system (i.e., result in a
substantial increase in either the number of vehicle trips, the volume to
capacity ratio on roads, or congestion at intersections)?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will require more parking
spaces than required by the existing warehouse use. The site for the proposed use will provide sufficient parking based on a
parking demand analysis prepared by Arch Beach Consulting on September 28, 2012 (Appendix D). The traffic increase in
the area is expected to be less than significant based on the Traffic Analysis prepared by Arch Beach Consulting on October
22, 2012 (Appendix E).
Based on the Existing conditions analysis, all study area intersections identified in the Arch Beach Consulting analysis are
currently operating with satisfactory levels of service (L OS) in the p.m. peak hour at LOS D or better. Under the Existing plus
Project conditions, the proposed project would not create any significant impacts to the study area intersections as the
project-added V/C increases are less than the City’s thresholds, and the Caltrans ramp interse ctions would not degrade to
below LOS D.
The proposed project would contribute 87 U-tuning vehicles (southbound to northbound Magnolia Avenue) to the Magnolia
Avenue/Woodland Drive intersection. With this contribution the intersection LOS would change from LOS A to LOS B. This
change would not be considered a significant impact as the City’s significance thresholds would not be met.
b) Exceed, either individually or cumulatively, a level of service
standard established by the County’s Congestion Management Agency
for designated roads or highways?
No Impact. The County’s Congestion Management Plan (CMP) requires a project to generate 2,400 daily trips before a
traffic impact analysis is required. The applicant for the proposed project prepared a traffic analysis which forecasted 165
daily vehicle trips generated by the proposed project, a number less than this threshold. Additionally, the streets and
intersections adjacent to the project will continue to operate at acceptable levels of service. Therefore there are no impacts in
relation to the project exceeding standards of the CMP.
c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase
in traffic levels or a change in location those results in substantial safety
risks?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will not impact air traffic
patterns.
d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp
curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible use s?
No Impact. The project creates no new offsite improvements and is located in an established industrial community.
e) Result in inadequate emergency access?
No Impact. The site is located with an established industrial community and will not result in inadequate emergency access.
f) Result in inadequate parking capacity?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will require more parking
spaces than required by the existing industrial warehouse use. Based on the parking demand analysis prepared by Arch
Beach Consulting on September 28, 2012, the site for the proposed use will provide adequate parking.
g) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or pro grams supporting
alternative transportation (e.g., bus stops/routes, bicycle lanes,
sidewalks, etc.)?
No Impact. The project is consistent with the City’s General Plan land use designation (May 2004), and therefore, will not
conflict with any adopted policies, plans, or programs supporting alternative transportation.
- 13-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS -- Would the project:
a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board?
No Impact. According to the City’s Sewer Deficiency Map (Anaheim, 2007), the project site is not located in a sewer deficient
area, so the construction of new wastewater facilities will not be required. The project is consistent with the Anaheim Gen eral
Plan’s land use designation and will be required to comply with all requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities (including sewer (waste water) collection facilities) or
expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause
significant environmental effects?
Less Than Significant Impact. According to the City’s Sewer Deficiency Map (Anaheim, 2007), the project site i s not
located in a sewer deficient area, so the construction of new wastewater facilities will not be required. The project is
consistent with the Anaheim General Plan’s land use designation and will be required to comply with all requirements of the
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which
serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve
the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing
commitments?
No Impact. According to the City’s Sewer Deficiency Map (Anaheim, 2007), the project site is not located in a sewer deficient
area, so the construction of new wastewater facilities will not be required . The project is consistent with the Anaheim General
Plan’s land use designation and will be required to comply with all requirements of the Regional Water Quality Control Board.
d) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing fac ilities, the construction of which
could cause significant environmental effects?
No Impact. No new storm drain facilities will be required as the project will not create a substantial increase of the existing
use.
e) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project
(including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources
Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the
Environmental Information Form) from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space with negligible expansion of
capacity.
f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs?
g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations
related to solid waste?
No Impact (f and g). The City of Anaheim is required to comply with the requirements of the Cou ntywide Integrated Waste
Management Plan, and all other applicable State and Federal regulations . Currently, the City utilizes 2 landfills, The Olinda
Alpha Landfill (Brea) and the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill (Irvine). According to the County of Orange we bsite, each of these
landfills has capacity until 2021 and 2022 consecutively; therefore, this project will be sufficiently served by the existing
landfills.
h) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to electricity?
I) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to natural gas?
j) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to telephone service?
- 14-
Environmental Issues Potentially
Significant
Impact
Less Than
Significant
with
Mitigation
Less Than
Significant
Impact
No
Impact
k) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to television service/reception?
No Impact (h-k). The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space with negligible
expansion of capacity and will be not result in a need for additional utility systems, such as electricity, gas, etc .
XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE --
a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the
environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife
species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self -sustaining
levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the
number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or a nimal or
eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history
or prehistory?
No Impact. The project is located in an existing industrial property and will not have the potential to degrade the quality of
the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below
self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or
endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory.
b) Does the project have Impacts that are individually limited, but
cumulatively considerable? ("Cumulatively considerable" means that
the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in
connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current
projects, and the effects of probable future projects)?
Less Than Significant Impact. The project is located within the South Coast Air Quality Management District which has
been designated as a nonattainment area for certain criteria pollutants. Typical construction activities will generate speci fic
criteria pollutants; however, due to the minimal size of the project, it is not expected to be a cumulatively considerable Impact.
The project will comply with all local, regional, State, and Federal laws and regulations.
c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause
substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or
indirectly?
No Impact. The project consists of a tenant improvement in an existing industrial tenant space and will not cause substantial
adverse effects on human beings.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
NEGATIVE DECLARATION
City of Anaheim, P.O. Box 3222, Anaheim, CA 92803
PROJECT IDENTIFICATION: Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05633 (Development
Case No. 2012-00116)
PROJECT LOCATION: 1256 North Magnolia Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92801
PROJECT DESCRIPTION:
The applicant proposes to establish an indoor soccer/trampoline facility in an existing industrial
building. The project site is approximately 11.75 acres and is developed with three tenant spaces
measuring a total of 207,630 square feet.
STAFF CONTACT: PHONE: 714-765-4568
Andy Nogal, Associate Planner EMAIL: anogal@anaheim.net
NAME OF PROPERTY OWNER:
AVG Partners
ADDRESS:
9595 Wilshire Blvd., #710
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
AGENT’S NAME (if applicable):
Greg McCafferty
Development Advisors
PHONE: 714-606-7208
EMAIL: greg@development-
advisors.com
AGENT’S ADDRESS:
2390 E. Orangewood Ave., Suite 510
Anaheim, CA 92806
The Initial Study, as attached and made part of this Negative Declaration, indicates that the above project will have
no significant individual or cumulative adverse impact on the environment.
___ The mitigation measures identified in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. ___ have been included in the project
to avoid potentially significant effects.
XX No mitigation measures have been identified for this project.
Therefore, the above project is recommended for exemption from the requirement to prepare an Environmental
Impact Report pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act.
Authorized Signature – Planning Department
Date
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
SP 92-2DA1BIG'S PIZZA
C-GSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RM-4APTS6 DU
SP 92-2DA1VACANT
RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE
SP 92-2DA1FRONTIERMOTEL
SP 92-2DA1CARROWSREST.
SP 92-2DA1CLASSICMOTEL
SP 92-2DA1RAMADALIMITED
RM-4LUCEROAPTS46 DU
SP 92-2 (MHP)DA1ANAHEIM HARBORRV PARK
RM-4APTS16 DU
RM-4APTS14 DU
SP 92-2DA1CUSTOM JOHN'S GIFTS
RM-4APTS16 DU
C-GSERVICE STATION
C-GVACANT
SP 92-2DA1HARBORAUTOREPAIR
SP 92-2DA1ANAHEIM RV VILLAGE
SP 92-2DA1HORACE MANNELEMENTARY SCHOOL
RM-3CONDOMINIUMS/TOWNHOUSES
SP 92-2DA1HOTEL MENAGE
O-LANAHEIM ASTORIAINN AND SUITES
RM-2CONDOMINIUMS84 DU SP 92-2DA1DAYS INN& SUITES
SP 92-2DA1SERVICE STATION
W V E R M O N T A V E
S C I T R ON ST
S PALM STS CI
TRON STW V E R M O N T A V E
5 F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
W BALL RD S HARBOR BLVDW. BALL RDS. WALNUT STS.
ANAHEI
M BLVDS.
EAST STS. HARBOR BLVDE. BALL RD
S. LEWIS STW . B R O A D W A Y
S. DISNEYLAND DR1 0 2 7 So uth Harbor Boulevard
D E V N o. 2012-00112
Subject Property APN: 251-041-12
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
S C IT R O N S T W VERMONT AVES PALM STS CI
TRON STW V E R M O N T A V E
5
F
R
E
E
W
A
Y
W BALL RD S HARBOR BLVDW. BALL RDS. WALNUT STS.
ANAHEI
M BLVDS.
EAST STS. HARBOR BLVDE. BALL RD
S. LEWIS STW . B R O A D W A Y
S. DISNEYLAND DR1 0 2 7 So uth Harbor Boulevard
D E V N o. 2012-00112
Subject Property APN: 251-041-12
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2012-04913 AND
FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2012-00006 AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2012-00112)
(1027 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as
the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Variance No. 2012-04913 and
Final Site Plan No. 2012-00006 to expand an existing restaurant (the "Project") with a variance
for fewer parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (herein referred to as the
"Code") for certain real property located at 1027 South Harbor Boulevard in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly described on Exhibit A, attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 1.14-acres, is developed with a
full service restaurant. The Property is located in the SP92-2 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Commercial Recreation land uses;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on December 3, 2012 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission
finds and determines that the proposed project is within that class of projects which consist of the
repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities,
involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this
determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request to permit the proposed Project on the Property does find
and determine the following facts:
1. That the request to expand the existing restaurant complies with the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan (SP92-2), subject to the approval of Variance No. 2012-04913 and the conditions
of approval.
- 2 - PC2012-***
2. The design and layout of the proposed Project will not interfere with the use and
enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or
pedestrian hazards.
3. The architectural design of the proposed Project is compatible with the character of
the surrounding development located within the land area of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan.
4. The design of the proposed Project will provide a desirable environment for its
occupants, the visiting public, and its neighbors, through the appropriate use of materials, texture
and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing and be appropriately maintained.
5. The proposed Project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or
materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed Project.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the
request for a variance for fewer parking spaces than required by the Code and for a setback that
is less than required by Code should be approved for the following reasons:
(a) SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces.
(110 spaces required; 84 spaces proposed)
(b) SECTION NO. 18.116.090.040 Minimum interior setback requirement.
(80 feet required; 10 feet proposed)
1. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-
street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces
necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably
foreseeable conditions of operation of such use because a parking study was submitted by the
applicant, determining that the proposed number of parking spaces for the project is sufficient to
accommodate the proposed expansion of the restaurant. The parking study indicates that 67
parking spaces will be required by the restaurant during peak demand operating hours based on
observations at the existing restaurant;
2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand
and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the peak parking
demands of the restaurant;
3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and
competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the
proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate peak parking demands of
the restaurant;
- 3 - PC2012-***
4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic
congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the
project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the Property and are designed to allow
for adequate on-site circulation; and
5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular
ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are
designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and therefore will not impede vehicular ingress to
or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
restaurant.
6. That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape,
location and surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning
classification in the vicinity of the proposed Project that result in limited and inefficient use of
the Property if it were developed in conformance with development standards. The subject
Property has a lot width that is significantly greater in the front of the property than in the rear.
The shape of the property limits the available area for expansion to the front of the property and
the setback requirement is intended to prevent tall structures adjacent to residential uses. The
height of the restaurant at the proposed setback is 21 feet. Therefore, it is appropriate to permit a
reduced interior setback.
7. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code
deprives the Property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning
classification in the vicinity.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim as follows:
1. The Planning Commission does hereby approve Variance No. 2012-04913 and Final
Site Plan No. 2012-00006, subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general
welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete
conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code.
Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director
upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the
original intent and purpose of the conditions, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and
(iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or
approved development.
2. Any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in
accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-
Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
- 4 - PC2012-***
3. The adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
4. Approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the
extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
5. The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this
discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay
all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of December 3, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City
Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 5 - PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 6 - PC2012-***
- 7 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “B”
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04913
AND FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2012-00006
(DEV2012-00112)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
REVIEW BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
1 There is no backflow prevention assembly at the existing l-inch
water service meter. A lead-free backflow prevention assembly
meeting the City of Anaheim's standard shall be installed at the
meter prior to issuance of the first building permit. Additionally,
if this project contains more than 2,500 SF of landscaping, a
separate irrigation meter and backflow prevention assembly
meeting the City of Anaheim's standard is required prior to
issuance of the first building permit.
Public
Utilities,
Water
Engineering
Division
2 Property owner/developer shall contact Water Engineering for
recycled water system requirements and specific water
conservation measures to be incorporated into the building and
landscape construction plans.
Public
Utilities,
Water
Engineering
Division
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION
3 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in
accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of
Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 7, and as
conditioned herein.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
4 That extensions for further time to complete conditions of
approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170
of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
5 That timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be
amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause
provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the
original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the
modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and
(iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward
establishment of the use or approved development.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
6 Approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed
request only to the extent that complies with the Anaheim
Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or
findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding
any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
DRAFT
1027 South Harbor Boulevard
Parking Study
Anaheim, CA 92805
City of Anaheim, California
Prepared for
City of Anaheim
Planning Department
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
October 16, 2012
Prepared by
IBI Group
18401 Von Karman Ave, Suite 110
Irvine, CA 92612
(949) 833-5588
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- ii -
Table of Contents
1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1
2.0 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................. 2
3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 4
3.1 Existing Site ......................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Proposed Site ...................................................................................................................... 4
3.3 Traffic and Access .............................................................................................................. 4
4.0 SITE USES ................................................................................................................................................ 6
4.1 Existing Site Uses ................................................................................................................ 6
4.2 Proposed Site Uses ............................................................................................................. 6
5.0 PARKING REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 7
5.1 Existing Site Parking Requirements .................................................................................... 7
5.2 Proposed Project Parking Requirements ............................................................................ 7
6.0 EXISTING SITE PARKING SURVEY ........................................................................................................... 8
6.1 Shakey’s Pizza Parlor Parking Survey ................................................................................. 8
7.0 METHODOLOGY OF STUDY .................................................................................................................... 10
8.0 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 11
8.1 Parking Space Requirements ........................................................................................... 11
9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 12
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- iii -
List of Figures
Figure 2.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 3
Figure 3.1 Project Site Plan .............................................................................................................. 5
Figure 6.1 Project Site Parking Area ................................................................................................ 9
List of Tables
Table 5-1: Off-Street Parking Space Requirements for Existing Site .............................................. 7
Table 5-2: Existing Site Parking Space Requirement Calculation ................................................... 7
Table 5-3: Proposed Site Addition Parking Space Requirement Calculation ................................. 7
Table 6-1 Shakey’s Pizza Parlor Site Parking Occupancy .............................................................. 8
Table 7-1 Parking Generation Comparison ................................................................................... 10
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 1 -
1.0 Introduction
This report documents the results of a parking demand study prepared for Shakey’s Pizza Parlor
(the project) located at 1027 South Harbor Boulevard just north of Ball Road in the City of Anaheim.
The project is proposing to add 1,180 square feet of dining space to the existing restaurant and is
seeking a parking variance to maintain the 84 parking spaces onsite. The purpose of this parking
study is to identify existing parking demand and estimate forecast parking demand that would be
generated by the additional dining space. The objective is to determine whether the existing
parking spaces are sufficient to meet future demand with an expanded restaurant.
The study work scope was developed in conjunction with and approved by the City of Anaheim. All
assumptions and methodologies are consistent with the City of Anaheim guidelines for a parking
demand study.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 2 -
2.0 Project Location
The project site is located at 1027 South Harbor Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, within an area
zoned for Commercial Recreation. This type of commercial land use is intended to provide for tourist
and entertainment related industries. The site is located on a lot northwest of the Harbor Blvd and
Ball Road intersection. Orange Grove Elementary School and a Smoke Shop are located to the east
of the project site; across Harbor Blvd. Immediately adjacent to the project site is a Recreational
Vehicle Village to the north and Days Inn and Suites Hotel to the south.
Harbor Boulevard is a six-lane divided Major Arterial that travels north and south, and Ball Road is a
six-lane divided Primary Arterial that runs east and west through Orange County. Other major streets
that run parallel to Harbor Boulevard include Lemon Street and Anaheim Blvd to the east and
Disneyland Drive to the west. Major streets that run perpendicular to Harbor Blvd include Vermont
Ave to the north and Ball Road to the south.
The project site is located east of the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5). Figure 2.1 provides a vicinity map
showing the relative location of the project site.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard - Shakey’s
Pizza Parlor Parking Study
October 2012Harbor BoulevardBall Rd
Key Map
Project Site
Figure 2.1 – Project Location
Project
Location
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 4 -
3.0 Site Description
3.1 EXISTING SITE
The project site is located on 45,600 square-foot lot and includes a 6,162 square-foot single story
restaurant building.
There are 84 off-street parking spaces available for use at the existing project site, including four
designated accessible spaces. Surface parking spaces are provided in a lot surrounding the front
entrance and side of the restaurant. The parking lot consists of a North wall, South wall, center
triangle and entrance area.
Existing parking stall design is in compliance with City of Anaheim Standard Plans 470 and 471.
3.2 PROPOSED SITE
The property owner is requesting an additional 1,180 square feet of dining space be built extending
from the northwest corner of the existing restaurant, resulting in a total building size of 7,342 square
feet. This additional space will provide seating for an additional 75 guests. The physical aspects of
the existing site, including parking configuration and access will remain the same.
The City of Anaheim Municipal Code has an established minimum parking requirement for restaurant
use. Based on the city’s parking requirements, the project would be required to provide parking
spaces with the proposed expansion.
The project site plan is provided in Figure 3.1
3.3 TRAFFIC AND ACCESS
Access to the project site is provided via an access driveway off of South Harbor Blvd. All existing
access driveways will remain the same with the proposed project.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard - Shakey’s
Pizza Parlor Parking Study
October 2012
Figure 3.1 – Proposed Site Plan
Note: Actual number of parking stalls on-site is 84
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 6 -
4.0 Site Uses
4.1 EXISTING SITE USES
The existing site consists of a 6,161 square-foot single story restaurant. The Pizza Parlor restaurant
provides sit-down and take-out services. The inside of the restaurant has a maximum capacity of
184 guests. There are no outdoor seating facilities.
The restaurant is open seven days a week. Operating hours are 11:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Sunday to
Friday, and on Saturday between 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m.
4.2 PROPOSED SITE USES
The expanded restaurant is expected to hold an additional 75 guests in 1,180 square feet without
reducing the number of parking spaces.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 7 -
5.0 Parking Requirements
5.1 EXISTING SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The minimum number of off-street parking spaces required for each land use type is defined in
Section 18 of the City of Anaheim Zoning Code. The existing site consists of a single building that
falls under the Restaurant – Full Service land use category. Table 5-1 shows the Non-Residential
Parking Requirements of the existing use as stated in section 18 of the City of Anaheim Zoning
Code.
Table 5-1: Off-Street Parking Space Requirements for Existing Site
Use Classification Minimum Required Parking Spaces
Restaurant – Full Service
8 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA if integrated into a planned
development complex; 15 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, if not
integrated into a planned development complex.
Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040
GFA – gross floor area
The existing project building is 6,162 square feet. Per the City of Anaheim Zoning Code, a minimum
of 92 parking spaces is required for the existing project site. The number of off-street parking
spaces required for the project site is calculated in Table 5-2.
Table 5-2: Existing Site Parking Space Requirement Calculation
Use Classification Unit Quantity Min Rate
(Spaces/Unit)
Spaces
Required
Restaurant – Full Service TSF 6,162 15 92
Total 92
Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040
TSF –thousand square feet
There are currently 84 parking spaces provided at the site for use by the pizza parlor. Based on the
City’s minimum parking requirement, there is currently a deficit of 8 parking spaces provided at the
project site.
5.2 PROPOSED PROJECT PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The proposed project consists of adding seating indoors for 75 additional guests at the Pizza Parlor.
The existing square footage of the restaurant will increase by 1,180 square feet to 7,342 square feet
but the number of parking spaces provided will remain the same with the proposed project. Table
5.3 identifies the additional parking that would be required under the zoning code for the proposed
addition.
Table 5-3: Proposed Site Addition Parking Space Requirement Calculation
Use Classification Unit Quantity Min Rate
(Spaces/Unit)
Spaces
Required
Restaurant – Full Service TSF 1,180 15 18
Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040
TSF –thousand square feet
The proposed addition results in a total minimum parking requirement of 110 spaces.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 8 -
6.0 Existing Site Parking Survey
6.1 SHAKEY’S PIZZA PARLOR PARKING SURVEY
A parking survey was conducted at the project site on a Thursday and a Saturday to capture
existing parking demand. Counts were scheduled to occur during the project’s peak operating
hours. Weekday parking space occupancy counts were conducted at the project site on Thursday,
September 27, 2012 and Saturday September 29, 2012 from 10:30 a.m. to 2:30 p.m. and from 5:00
p.m. to 9:00 p.m. The results are summarized in Table 6-1, and the detailed occupancy data sheets
are provided in the Appendix. Figure 6.1 illustrates the on-site parking areas.
Table 6-1 Shakey’s Pizza Parlor Site Parking Occupancy
Time
Thursday Saturday
Parked
Vehicles
%
Occupancy
Parked
Vehicles
%
Occupancy
10:30 a.m. 4 5% 10 12%
11:00 a.m. 12 14% 12 14%
11:30 a.m. 21 25% 20 24%
12:00 p.m. 26 31% 36 43%
12:30 p.m. 38 45% 42 50%
1:00 p.m. 41 49% 37 44%
1:30 p.m. 34 41% 42 50%
2:00 p.m. 19 23% 37 44%
2:30 p.m. 16 19% 36 43%
5:00 p.m. 6 7% 33 39%
5:30 p.m. 8 10% 26 31%
6:00 p.m. 16 19% 33 39%
6:30 p.m. 16 19% 37 44%
7:00 p.m. 16 19% 41 49%
7:30 p.m. 14 17% 56 67%
8:00 p.m. 14 17% 54 64%
8:30 p.m. 9 11% 54 64%
9:00 p.m. 13 15% 49 58%
Peak 49% @ 1:00 p.m. 67% @ 7:30 p.m.
Maximum weekday utilization of the project site occurred at 1:00 p.m. At that time, 41 of the 84
spaces contained parked vehicles, for an occupancy of 49 percent (49%). The maximum utilization
on Saturday occurred at 7:30 p.m. At this time, 56 of the 84 spaces contained parked vehicles, for a
parking occupancy of 67 percent (67%). Assuming full occupancy of the existing restaurant seating
area, this parking occupancy rate corresponds to a vehicle occupancy rate of 3.28 persons per
parked vehicle. This ratio is not unexpected as the restaurant is a family-oriented establishment and
a significant portion of patrons would be expected to attend with families.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard - Shakey’s
Pizza Parlor Parking Study
October 2012
Ball RdSouth Harbor BoulevardFigure 6.1 – Project Site Parking Area
Shakey’s Pizza Parlor Parking Space – 84 Spaces
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 10 -
7.0 Methodology of Study
The Project would result in a 7,342 square foot Full Service Restaurant. Per the City of Anaheim
Municipal Code, the minimum number of parking spaces required for this use is 110 total spaces.
The Project site provides 84 parking spaces, which is 26 spaces short of the minimum parking
requirement.
Parking Demand Survey and Actual Parking Demand
A parking survey of the site was conducted to determine actual parking demand for the existing
184-seat restaurant. Counts were conducted on a Thursday and Saturday between 10:30 a.m. to
2:30 p.m. and 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. to capture peak parking demand. The results show that peak
parking occupancy occurs at 1:00 p.m. on a typical Thursday and 7:30 p.m. on a typical Saturday,
with an occupancy of 41 spaces (49%) and 56 spaces (67%) respectively. This translates to a peak
demand parking rate of 7 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area on a typical weekday and
9 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area on a typical Saturday. Additionally, based on the
current seating occupancy of the restaurant, the peak parking demand of 56 vehicles corresponds
to the vehicle occupancy rate of 3.28 persons per vehicle.
The results of this parking survey show that actual parking demand does not exceed the available
number of parking spaces provided at the project site and that no spillover parking occurs. Even
though the City of Anaheim Zoning Code would require 92 parking spaces for the existing 6,162
square foot restaurant, existing observed peak parking demand is significantly lower than this
amount at 56 spaces.
Comparison of City Parking Requirement and Observed Demand
A comparison of the City’s parking requirement and the observed demand rate generated by the
project is summarized in Table 7-1.
Table 7-1 Parking Generation Comparison
Restaurant
Facility
Quantity
(Sq. Ft.)
City of Anaheim Zoning
Requirements Observed Parking Survey
Weekday
Demand
Weekend
Demand
Weekday
Observed
Weekend
Observed
Existing 6,162 92 92 41 56
Additional 1,180 18 18 8 11
Total 7,342 110 110 47 67
The City’s parking requirement for the proposed expansion corresponds to 18 parking spaces.
Applying the observed the survey of actual parking demand at the project site suggests a lower
parking demand could result. The results from the parking survey identify a forecasted need for 8 to
11 parking spaces to accommodate demand generated by the proposed seating expansion. Even if
18 additional spaces required the Zoning Code were applied to existing peak demand, the
anticipated peak demand with the proposed expansion would be a maximum of 74 parking spaces,
well below the supply of 84 spaces.
Based on parking survey observations, the project site is not expected to generate parking demand
greater than the number of spaces provided.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 11 -
8.0 Findings
8.1 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS
•18.42.110.0101: The variance under the conditions imposed will not cause fewer off-street
parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary
to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably
foreseeable conditions of operation.
The proposed project will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided.
Shakey’s Pizza Parlor is proposing to add an additional 1,180 square feet of indoor seating
space on the existing lot. The additional square footage of the restaurant building will not
cause any existing parking spaces to be removed. Additionally, the existing parking
demand generated by the land use does not exceed supply and the proposed building
addition is not forecast to change this condition.
•18.42.110.0102: The Shakey’s Pizza Parlor project will not increase demand and competition for
parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
The project will not increase demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public
streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. A parking survey conducted during
typical weekday and weekend operations at the project site shows that current parking
demand does not exceed existing supply. The proposed project does not involve an
increase in parking capacity at the site, and is not expected to generate additional parking
demand that would be greater than the current parking supply.
•18.42.110.0103: The Shakey’s Pizza Parlor project will not increase the demand and competition
for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
Shakey’s Pizza Parlor will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces
upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project. Current
parking utilization is below capacity, and the project is not expected to generate additional
parking demand over and above the existing parking supply.
•18.42.110.0104: The Shakey’s Pizza Parlor project will not increase traffic congestion within the
off-street parking areas or lots provided.
Shakey’s Pizza Parlor will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking lot
provided at the project site. The parking lot serving Shakey’s Pizza Parlor provides 84
spaces. Parking surveys conducted as part of this study show that during peak parking
occupancy, 67 of the spaces are expected to be occupied with the proposed 1,180 square
foot addition.
•18.42.110.0105: The Shakey’s Pizza Parlor project will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress
from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
Shakey’s Pizza Parlor will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties
along South Harbor Blvd in the immediate vicinity of the project site. The adjacent properties
are located on exclusive lots with separate access driveways. No queuing of vehicles is
anticipated on South Harbor as a result of this project.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
- 12 -
9.0 Recommendations and Conclusions
Shakey’s Pizza Parlor is requesting a parking variance as part of a proposal to add 1,180 square
feet of indoor seating space to an existing restaurant. This additional seating space will hold an
additional 75 guests. The proposed project will result in an increase in size to the existing restaurant
from 6,162 square feet to 7,342 square feet.
The existing project site includes 6,162 square feet of single story restaurant use located at 1027
South Harbor Blvd in the City of Anaheim. The restaurant is located in an exclusive lot that provides
84 parking spaces for employees and customers. Operating hours are Sunday through Friday, 11:00
a.m. to 10:00 p.m. and on Saturday from 11:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m. Adjacent to the restaurant is a RV
Village and Day’s Inn. Across the street there is an Elementary School and Smoke Shop.
The purpose of this study was to examine parking demand at the project site and determine whether
existing parking supply is sufficient to meet demand or if more parking spaces are required. The
study consisted of two parking surveys conducted on a weekday and a weekend during peak
operating hours.
The parking survey results show that parking demand at the project site does not exceed existing
parking supply. The peak parking demand at the project site was 41 parking spaces on a typical
weekday and 56 parking spaces on a typical weekend. This translates to a parking rate of 7 spaces
per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area and 9 spaces per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area
respectively. At these rates the additional 1,180 square feet of indoor restaurant space would
generate an additional parking demand for 11 spaces during the peak period.
Per the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, the indoor restaurant area is classified as a Restaurant –
Full Service use. The proposed project is required to provide a minimum of 15 spaces per 1,000
square feet of gross floor area for Restaurant – Full Service. This translates to a minimum addition of
18 parking spaces to the project site. With existing peak parking demand at 56 spaces, the existing
supply at 84 spaces would be more than sufficient to accommodate an additional 18 vehicles.
The two methodologies used to calculate parking demand result in an estimated increase in
demand between 11 and 18 spaces added to existing demand. Based on observations of the
project site, actual demand is lower than capacity, and the proposed project is not expected to
generate more parking demand than the number of parking spaces provided.
In conclusion, the proposed project is not expected to exceed parking supply at the existing site.
The parking surveys show that the proposed project site would generate a peak occupancy of up to
67 to 74 parking spaces, which does not exceed the existing 84 parking spaces currently provided.
No significant impacts to parking supply are anticipated from the proposed project.
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
APPENDIX
PARKING SURVEY – WEEKDAY COUNT
Shakey's PizzaPARKING STUDYSPACES LOCATION TYPE 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 12.30 13.00 13.30 14.00 14.30 17.00 17.30 18.00 18.30 19.00 19.30 20.00 20.30 21.0023 North Wall UNMARKED 0 0 0 0 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0X HANDICAPXILLEGALThursday, September 27, 20121027 South Harbor Blv, Anaheim, CAXILLEGAL28 South Wall UNMARKED 3 9 14 15 19 17 16 13 12 3 3 10 10 9 8 7 3 4X HANDICAPX ILLEGAL6 Entrance UNMARKED 0 1 5 6 6 5 4 4 2 2 3 3 4 4 4 5 4 52 HANDICAP 0 1 1 1 2 2 1 1 1 1 2 2 0 0 0 0 0 0X ILLEGAL23 Center Tri UNMARKED 1 1 1 4 9 14 12 1 1 0 0 1 2 3 2 2 2 22 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2X ILLEGAL84 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 4 12 21 26 38 41 34 19 16 6 8 16 16 16 14 14 9 13100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 4.76% 14.29% 25.00% 30.95% 45.24% 48.81% 40.48% 22.62% 19.05% 7.14% 9.52% 19.05% 19.05% 19.05% 16.67% 16.67% 10.71% 15.48%
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
APPENDIX
PARKING SURVEY – WEEKEND COUNT
Shakey's PizzaPARKING STUDYSPACES LOCATION TYPE 10.30 11.00 11.30 12.00 12.30 13.00 13.30 14.00 14.30 17.00 17.30 18.00 18.30 19.00 19.30 20.00 20.30 21.0023 North Wall UNMARKED 1 1 1 5 8 8 10 8 6 7 2 2 2 5 13 12 12 10X HANDICAPXILLEGALSaturday, September 29, 20121027 South Harbor Blv, Anaheim, CAXILLEGAL28 South Wall UNMARKED 4 5 10 17 17 15 8 8 13 11 14 12 18 17 17 17 16 15XHANDICAPXILLEGAL6 Entrance UNMARKED 4 5 6 4 5 4 6 4 4 6 5 6 6 6 6 6 6 72HANDICAP 1 1 1 0 2 1 2 2 2 0 0 0 1 2 2 2 2 2XILLEGAL111XILLEGAL11123 Center Tri UNMARKED 0 0 2 10 10 9 15 14 11 9 5 12 9 10 16 16 15 132 HANDICAP 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1 0 2 2XILLEGAL84 TOTAL VEHICLES PARKED 10 12 20 36 42 37 42 37 36 33 26 33 37 41 56 54 54 49100% PERCENTAGE OCCUPIED 11.90% 14.29% 23.81% 42.86% 50.00% 44.05% 50.00% 44.05% 42.86% 39.29% 30.95% 39.29% 44.05% 48.81% 66.67% 64.29% 64.29% 58.33%
1027 South Harbor Boulevard – Shakey’s Pizza Parking Study DRAFT
APPENDIX
CITY OF ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE (APPLICABLE
SECTIONS)
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
pt-3 typ.
pt-2 typ.
awn typ.
pt-4 typ.
pt-1 typ.
new storefront
and glazing to
match existing
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
C-GSHOPPING CENTER
C-GMEDICAL OFFICE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCEC-GRETAIL
RS-2VACANT
C-GRETAIL
RS-2VACANT
RM-3CONDOS16 DU
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL
RM-4FOURPLEX
C-GRETAIL
APARTMENTS30 DU
C-GRELIGIOUS USE
C-GOFFICE
RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERM-4APTS7 DU
C-GRETAIL RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCEC-GSHOPPING CENTER
C-GSHOPPING CENTER
C-GSHOPPING CENTER
RM-4TRIPLEX
RM-4TRIPLEX RS-2SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCECITY OF ANAHEIMCITY OF ANAHEIMCITY OF GARDEN GROVECITY OF GARDEN GROVES EUCLID STW KATELLA AVE
W DUD LE Y AV ES TIARA STS CARNELIAN STS CAMROSE STS LIDA LNS CALMAR STW. KATELLA AVES. EUCLID STS. WEST STS. NINTH STW. CERRITOS AVE
S. WALNUT STS. BROOKHURST STS. DISNEYLAND DR1 6 6 0 Wes t Katella Avenue
D E V N o. 2012-00104
Subject Property APN: 090-651-36
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
S EUCLID STW KATELLA AVE
W DUD LE Y AV ES TIARA STS CARNELIAN STS CAMROSE STS LIDA LNS CALMAR STW. KATELLA AVES. EUCLID STS. WEST STS. NINTH STW. CERRITOS AVE
S. WALNUT STS. BROOKHURST STS. DISNEYLAND DR1 6 6 0 Wes t Katella Avenue
D E V N o. 2012-00104
Subject Property APN: 090-651-36
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2012-04912 AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2012-00104)
(1660 WEST KATELLA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as
the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Variance No. 2012-04912 to
construct a wall sign larger than permitted by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the “Project”)
(herein referred to as the "Code") for certain real property located at 1660 West Katella Avenue in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly described on
Exhibit A, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 3.79 acres which is developed as
part of a 17-acre commercial shopping center. The Property is located in the General
Commercial (CG) Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General
Commercial land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on December 3, 2012 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does find and determine that the variance request
to construct a wall sign for “dd’s Discounts” store that is larger than permitted by the Code
should be denied for the following reasons:
(a) SECTION NO. 18.44.110.010.0105
Maximum sign area for wall signs.
(110 square feet permitted; 148 square feet proposed)
1. That there are no special circumstances that apply to the property, including size,
shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not also apply to other property under
identical zoning classification in the vicinity because this property is in the same zone, within the
same commercial center as others businesses that share the same size, shape, topography and
distance setback from Katella Avenue;
2. That, because of there are no special circumstances applicable to this property,
strict application of the Zoning Code would not deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by
other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Other signs on store fronts
located in-line with this store within the same commercial center and having the same setback
distance from Katella Avenue do not exceed the permitted sign size.
- 2 - PC2012-***
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim as follows:
1. The Planning Commission does hereby deny Variance No. 2012-04912.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 3, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in
the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 3 - PC2012-***
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
SHEET1057 solano ave.
p.o. box 6153
albany, ca 94706-0153
510/526-0296 fax 526-6092
www.billmoore.com
bill moore & associates
MEMBER
K
#5143 CENTRAL ANAHEIM
Euclid Shopping Center
SEC W. Katella Avenue & S. Euclid Street
Anaheim, CA 92802
drawn 09/26/11
SITE PLAN
NOT TO SCALE NORTH W. KATELLA AVE.S. EUCLID ST.Proposed
Sign
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
SHEET1057 solano ave.
p.o. box 6153
albany, ca 94706-0153
510/526-0296 fax 526-6092
www.billmoore.com
bill moore & associates
MEMBER
K
#5143 CENTRAL ANAHEIM
Euclid Shopping Center
SEC W. Katella Avenue & S. Euclid Street
Anaheim, CA 92802
drawn 09/26/11
SITE PLAN
NOT TO SCALE NORTH W. KATELLA AVE.S. EUCLID ST.Proposed
Sign
10'-4"
GENERAL NOTES:
ROSS' CONTRACTOR TO FURNISH ADEQUATE ACCESS BEHIND LOGO
LETTERS AND CABINET FOR INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE, PER
ARTICLE 600 OF THE N.E.C.
ROSS' CONTRACTOR TO SUPPLY FOUR (4) 20 AMP 120V ISOLATED SIGN
CIRCUITS (DIRECTLY CONNECTED TO ELECTRICAL PANEL WITH NO
COMMON GROUNDS OR COMMON NEUTRALS, WITH #10 WIRE MIN.)
AND JUNCTION BOXES TO AREA BEHIND SIGN LETTERS CONNECTED TO
THE ENERGY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM.
ROSS' CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE AT LEAST 1/2" THICK PLYWOOD
BACKING BEHIND ALL E.I.F.S. WALL SYSTEMS FOR SIGN AND BANNER
SUPPORT.
BACKGROUND FOR SIGN LETTERS AND CABINET IS TO BE FREE OF
JOINTS & REVEALS, AND OF A LIGHT COLOR (MINIMUM 75% L.R.V.) TO
PROVIDE HIGH CONTRAST AND VISIBILITY FOR THE SIGN. THE BASE
BUILDING COLOR IS TO HAVE A MINIMUM L.R.V. OF 55%. COLOR
APPEARANCE MAY BE ALTERED BY PRINTING, SEE APPROVED FINAL
CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS FOR COLOR SPECIFICATIONS.
A 60"H INDIVIDUAL "DD'S" PAN CHANNEL
LETTER-LOK LOGO LETTERS:
FACES: TUF-GLAS SG 21249-E1 PURPLE
(TEAL 21248-E1 APOSTROPHE)
RETURNS: 8"D ALUM. W/ WHITE FINISH
TRIM CAP: 2" WHITE JEWELITE
LETTER BACKS: WHITE ALUMINUM
NEON: FOUR-TUBE 15MM EGL PURPLE
MOUNTING: 1/4"-20 GALV. THRU-BOLTS
PEG OFF: 1/2" SPACERS
C 18"H INDIVIDUAL "DD'S" PAN CHANNEL
LETTER-LOK LOGO LETTERS:
FACES: TUF-GLAS SG 21249-E1 PURPLE
RETURNS: 5"D ALUM. W/ WHITE FINISH
TRIM CAP: 1" WHITE JEWELITE
LETTER BACKS: WHITE ALUMINUM
NEON: SINGLE STROKE 12MM EGL PURPLE
MOUNTING: 1/4"-20 GALV. THRU-BOLTS
PEG OFF: 1/2" SPACERS
B 30"H INDIVIDUAL "DISCOUNTS" PAN CHANNEL
LETTER-LOK LOGO LETTERS
ALL CALLOUTS SAME AS "DD'S" EXCEPT:
FACES: TUF-GLAS SG 21248-E1 TEAL
NEON: TWO-TUBE 15MM EGL E-12 TURQUOISE
F 12" H X 48" W X 10" D DOUBLE-FACED
INTERNALLY-ILLUMINATED UC SIGN 8'-6"
ABOVE FINISH FLOOR.
CENTER BETWEEN DOORS
(SEE SHEET 'UC' FOR DETAILS)
E NOT USED AT THIS LOCATION
H CLEAR ANODIZED ALUMINUM STOREFRONT
& DOORS BY ROSS' CONTRACTOR
I TYPICAL VINYL GRAPHICS APPLIED FIRST
SURFACE TO STOREFRONT WINDOW,
IMAGE MAY VARY FROM WHAT IS SHOWN.
(SEE SHEET 'WP' FOR DETAILS)
K ADJACENT PARAPET MAY NOT BE HIGHER
THAN THE DD'S BASE BUILDINGG TYPICAL ARCHITECTURAL LIGHTING BY
ROSS' CONTRACTOR
J TYPICAL SET OF FIVE (5) EYE-BOLTS
FOR BANNER ATTACHMENT, AS SHOWN,
BY ROSS' CONTRACTOR
THREE (3) SETS REQUIRED AS SHOWN.
D SIGN FASCIA BY ROSS' CONTRACTOR
(SEE NOTES)
SHEET1057 solano ave.
p.o. box 6153
albany, ca 94706-0153
510/526-0296 fax 526-6092
www.billmoore.com
bill moore & associates
MEMBER
S1
SCALE: 3/32" = 1'- 0"VARIANCE
1
Exhibit J 09/26/11
"CLR" on clear windows 12/06/11
rev sign size, -EL 01/10/12
-WP 01/17/12
+Dept. Band Sign Lttrs. 05/10/12
drawn 12/08/10
36'-3"
26'-3"
0'-0"
10'-7 3/4"
T.O. ROOF
T.O. PARAPET
FIN. FL.
B.O. SOFFIT
RB-ELEASE LINELEASE LINE110'-0"
#5143 CENTRAL ANAHEIM
Euclid Shopping Center
SEC W. Katella Avenue & S. Euclid Street
Anaheim, CA 92802
8'-6"
A.F.F.
12"
8'-6"
A.F.F.4'-0"10'-6" EQEQ10'-6"3'-9"10'-0"10'-0"4'-0"10'-0"10'-0"
STOREFRONT • NORTH • W. KATELLA AVE. • ELEVATIONEQEQ EQEQ12'-0"
21'-3"
30'-5"
4'-7 1/2"
4'-7"4'-7"
4'-7 1/2"
66"
16"
30"
17"18"
EXISTING
9'-6"
EQEQ
TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE: 148.0 SF
56.5 SF
53.0 SF
9.1 SF 6.0 SF 6.2 SF 8.2 SF9.0 SF
variance
7'-0"
24"
FROSTED FILMBY ROSS' G.C.
H IBAC G FD J
KK
SHEET1057 solano ave.
p.o. box 6153
albany, ca 94706-0153
510/526-0296 fax 526-6092
www.billmoore.com
bill moore & associates
PS1
MEMBER
#5143 CENTRAL ANAHEIM
SEC W. Katella Avenue & S. Euclid Street
Anaheim, CA 92802
drawn 09/26/11
1 2
3 4
5 6
1
10
N
Euclid Shopping Center
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
SHEET1057 solano ave.
p.o. box 6153
albany, ca 94706-0153
510/526-0296 fax 526-6092
www.billmoore.com
bill moore & associates
PS2
MEMBER
#5143 CENTRAL ANAHEIM
SEC W. Katella Avenue & S. Euclid Street
Anaheim, CA 92802
drawn 09/26/11
Euclid Shopping Center
7 98
10
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
I (PTMU)IND. FIRMS
I (PTMU)INDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)KatellaVACANT
I (PTMU)RETAIL
I (PTMU)VACANT
O-L (PTMU)KATELLA/LEWISCENTER
I (PTMU)KatellaVACANT
I (PTMU)STONE CENTER
I (PTMU)VACANT
I (PTMU)KatellaVACANT
I (PTMU)KatellaVIVERECONDOS
I (PTMU)FRITZSPORTS BAR
I (PTMU)RESTAURANTPLATINUM VISTA
I (PTMU)ORANGE COUNTYREGISTER
I (PTMU)IND. FIRMS
I (PTMU)INDUSTRIAL
I (PTMU)VACANT
S LEWIS STE KATELLA AVE
S WESTSIDE DRE. KAT E L L A A VES. HARBOR BLVDE. CERRITOS AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
S. M
A
N
C
H
ESTE
R AVE
S. HASTER STS. ANAHEIM BLVDS. SUNKIST STS. DOUGLASS RDW. KATELLA AVE
9 0 5 - 917 East Katella Aven ue
D E V N o. 2012-00059PLATINUM GATEW AY
Subject Property
APN: 082-261-23082-269-03082-269-02082-261-24
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED-USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE.°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
S LEWIS STE KATELLA AVE
S WESTSIDE DRE. KAT E L L A A VES. HARBOR BLVDE. CERRITOS AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
S. M
A
N
C
H
ESTE
R AVE
S. HASTER STS. ANAHEIM BLVDS. SUNKIST STS. DOUGLASS RDW. KATELLA AVE
9 0 5 - 917 East Katella Aven ue
D E V N o. 2012-00059PLATINUM GATEW AY
Subject Property
APN: 082-261-23082-269-03082-269-02082-261-24
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED-USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE.°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
-1- PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN (GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO. 2012-00486) AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH.
(DEV2012-00059)
WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at
the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west
of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison
easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel
Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim
Amtrak/Metrolink Station, and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light
industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail
development; and
WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council")
has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim
(hereinafter referred to as the "Planning Commission") certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel
Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No.
120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of
urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot
exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development and 15,570 on-site parking spaces.
The Grove of Anaheim, the renovated Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building
were developed/renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area
Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as
those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to
the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part
of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental
Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development
within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay
Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the
provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports,
entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including
increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a
net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new
office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space.
-2- PC2012-***
Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena
Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide
General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
The General Plan Update changed the General Plan designations within the project area from
Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High,
Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to
transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also
established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which
permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet
of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50, and
institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats
allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area
Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use
designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, which was prepared for the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development
intensities on a citywide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including an
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle
(collectively referred to herein as "FEIR No. 330"); and
WHEREAS, in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s
new vision for the Platinum Triangle, on August 17, 2004, the City Council replaced the MLUP
with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay
Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved
the form of the Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved
associated zoning reclassifications. Under these updated zoning regulations, property owners
desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter
into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and the updated and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 332”) to provide for the implementation of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and in conjunction with its consideration and approval
of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning
Code Amendment No. 2004-00036 and a series of related actions that, collectively, allowed for
an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500
residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial
uses; and
WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved
two addendums to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle
intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square
feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase
the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total
-3- PC2012-***
allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to up to 10,266 residential units,
5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the
General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized
Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable
development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847
square feet of commercial uses,16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet
of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 334”) in conjunction with its consideration and
approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089,
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to
provide for the implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and approval of
the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, in response to the application of K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L
Anaheim Properties II LLC (collectively referred to herein as "K/L") for entitlements allowing
for the development of a master planned mixed-use project comprised of, among other uses, a
320-unit residential condominium project, a 209,419 square foot twelve-story office building,
including a 5,586 square foot full-service restaurant, 4,381 square feet of retail space, and a
104,604 square foot 138-room hotel (the "Original Project") on real property consisting of
approximately 7.01 acres commonly known as 905 through 917 East Katella Avenue in the City
of Anaheim (the "Property"), the City Council determined on June 10, 2008 that FSEIR No. 334,
including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106B for the PTMLUP and
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 153, served as the appropriate environmental documentation for
the Original Project, including Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05304 and Development
Agreement No. 2008-00002 (the "Development Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6106 approving
the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05304 and
the Development Agreement, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334.
In consideration of the City’s exemplary historical record in avoiding litigation under the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and its commitment to proper environmental
review, the City Council repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project,
including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2010, the City Council approved amendments to the General
Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No.
2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the
allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone to up to 18,909 residential
-4- PC2012-***
units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and
1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning
reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project and Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively
referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339") ; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No.
1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5
Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162
of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact
report had occurred; and
WHEREAS, Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Shopoff"), has
entered into an agreement with K/L to purchase the Property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority conferred upon Shopoff by K/L and in accordance
with Section 21 of the Development Agreement and Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code (the "Code"), Shopoff submitted to the City a request to modify the site design and product
type of the Original Project, consisting of an increase in the number of dwelling units from 320
to 399 residential apartment units, a reduction in the amount of office and commercial
development, the addition of a public park (the "Platinum Gateway Project"). To that end,
Shopoff has requested the following entitlements:
(a) that the Development Agreement be amended and restated in the form of the proposed
First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2008-00002 (Development
Agreement No. 2008-00002D) (the "Amended and Restated Development Agreement")
presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted;
(b) that the General Plan be amended to modify "Table LU-4: General Plan Density
Provisions for Specific Areas of the City" to increase the number of dwelling units and
reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the Mixed-Use
land use designation of the Platinum Triangle Area and to amend various Elements of the
General Plan to include the addition of a public park ("General Plan Amendment No.
2012-00486");
(c) that the Zoning Code be amended to make the Zoning Code consistent with General
Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486, as adopted ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-
00107");
(d) that the following tables, figures and maps of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use
Plan, together with any and all textual references to the content of said tables, figures and
maps appearing throughout the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, be amended: (i)
Chapter 1, Table 1: General Plan Development Intensities, (ii) Chapter 2, Figure 4: The
Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan, (iii) Chapter 3, Table 3 - PTMU Overlay Zone
Development Intensities, (iv) Chapter 4, Figure 20: Landscape Concept Plan, and (v) the
Katella District Sub-Area A Map, set forth in Appendix G, PTMU Overlay Zone District
-5- PC2012-***
Sub-Area Development Intensity Maps (herein referred to interchangeably as
"Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559" or the "PTMLUP Amendments"); and
(e) that Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 be approved.
WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated Development Agreement, General Plan
Amendment No. 2012-00486, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107, Miscellaneous Case
No. 2012-00559 and Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 shall be referred to herein collectively as
the "Entitlements"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has heretofore approved Final Site Plan No. 2012-
00008 ("Final Site Plan") to provide for the development of the Platinum Gateway Project,
contingent upon the approval of the proposed Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486 proposes to amend the Anaheim
General Plan as follows:
1. Table LU-4: General Plan Density Provisions For Specific Areas of the City
• Amend the total number of dwelling units, maximum Commercial and Office
square footages with the Platinum Triangle Area as shown on Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Land Use Element
• Amend “Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the General
Plan as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3. Circulation Element
• Amend “Figure C-5: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities” of the Circulation
Element of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
4. Green Element
• Amend “Figure G-1: Green Plan” of the Green Element of the General Plan as
shown on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, this Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and
in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and
considered information presented by City staff and evidence for and against the proposed
Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements; and
-6- PC2012-***
WHEREAS, by the adoption of a separate resolution concurrently with but prior in
time to this Resolution, this Planning Commission has heretofore found and determined and
has recommended that the City Council so find and determine that FSEIR No. 339, together
with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 307, Addendum No. 1, and a subsequent
Addendum to FSEIR No. 339, which has been prepared in connection with the proposed
Platinum Gateway Project ("Addendum No. 2"), serve as the appropriate environmental
documentation for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements and satisfy
all of the requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of
the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact
report have occurred in connection with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and/or the
Entitlements; and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under
CEQA for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and/or the Entitlements and all other
actions authorized by this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation
and study made by itself, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing, does hereby find and determine as follows:
1. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2012-00486 maintains internal
consistency with the General Plan as the increase in the number of residential dwelling units;
reduction in the commercial and office square footages; and the implementation of an additional
public park is consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan for the Mixed
Use land use designation and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.
2. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2012-00486 would not be detrimental
to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the increase in
the number of dwelling units is negligible as it is off-set by the deletion of commercial and office
square footage. Further, public recreational amenities are enhanced by providing an additional
public park for the surrounding community;
3. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2012-00486 continue to be consistent
with the intent of the General Plan and would maintain the balance of land uses within the City;
and
4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2012-00486 is physically suitable to
accommodate the proposed modifications, including but not limited to, access, physical
constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses
because the relocation of the public park will be easily accessible to the general public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, this Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council
approve and adopt proposed General Plan Amendment 2012-00486 in the form attached
hereto as Exhibits A through D.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that proposed General Plan Amendment 2012-00486 be
approved contingent upon and subject to the approval of the other Entitlements, specifically, the
First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2008-00002 (Development
-7- PC2012-***
Agreement No. 2008-00002D), Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559, Zoning Code Amendment
No. 2012-00107, and Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, now pending.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each
and all of the conditions set forth in the resolution of this Planning Commission adopted
substantially concurrently with this Resolution relating to the proposed Amended and Restated
Development Agreement. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or
unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Shopoff is responsible for paying all charges related
to the processing of this discretionary case application within fifteen (15) days of the issuance of
the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this
application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 3, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
“Zoning Provisions - General” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-8- PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Secretary for the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the
Anaheim Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of
December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-1- PC2012-***
EXHIBIT "A"
TABLE LU-4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY
Location General Plan Land Use Designations Permitted Density
The Mountain
Park Area
Low Medium Hillside Density Residential
(Up to 6 du/ac)
Low Medium Density Residential
(Up to 16 du/ac)
485
2,015
(Up to 2,500 dwelling units)
Area “A”
(Parcel Map
94-205)
Low-Medium Density Residential Up to 140 dwelling units
The Disneyland
Resort Specific
Plan (SP 92-1)
Area
Commercial Recreation See Note No. 1 on next page.
The Anaheim
Resort Specific
Plan (SP 92-2)
Area
Commercial Recreation See Note No. 2 on next page.
Hotel Circle
Specific Plan
(SP 93-1) Area
Commercial Recreation The Hotel Circle Specific Plan allows for a
master planned hotel project including up
to 969 hotel rooms and integrated guest
oriented amenities including full-service
restaurants, conference room/banquet
facilities, pool and spa areas, tour
bus/shuttle facilities, and pedestrian
promenades and plaza areas with
comprehensive landscaping.
The Platinum
Triangle Area
Mixed-Use
Residential
Commercial
Office
Institutional
Office High and Office Low
Institutional
Industrial
Open Space
18,999 dwelling units
4,795,111 square feet
9,652,747 square feet
1,500,000 square feet
4,478,356 square feet*
3.0 FAR
0.5 FAR
0.1 FAR
* The maximum FAR for properties designated
Office-Low is 0.5; the maximum FAR for properties
designated Office-High is 2.0.
The Stonegate
Development
Area
Low Density Residential Up to 35 dwelling units
-2- PC2012-***
TABLE LU-4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY (CONTINUED)
Note No. 1: The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an approximate 489.7 acre
international multi-day vacation designation resort including ongoing modifications to the Disneyland theme park, the
development of a new theme park, additional hotels and entertainment areas, administrative office facilities, new
public and private parking facilities, and an internal transportation system. This development is within five planning
Districts (Theme Park, Hotel, Parking, Future Expansion and District A) and a C-R Overlay, which allows
development within the Overlay to either be consistent with the underlying Resort District or subject to the same land
uses as in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also identifies
maximum development density designations for hotel/motel development in the Hotel District (up to 5,600 hotel
rooms for the entire District with up to 1,000 hotel rooms transferable to the Theme Park District), in District A (the
maximum number of units permitted would be 75 hotel/motel rooms per gross acre or 75 hotel/motel rooms per
parcel existing on June 29, 1993, whichever is greater) and the C-R Overlay (the maximum number of units
permitted on a parcel would be the following: 1) for parcels designated Low Density – up to 50 hotel rooms per gross
acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; and 2) for parcels designated Medium Density – up to 75 hotel rooms per
gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; provided that for those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel
rooms which exceeded the maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density.) It should be
noted that accessory uses may be developed as well as other visitor-serving commercial/retail and restaurant uses
along with these hotel/motel uses. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also provides for the development of the
Anaheim GardenWalk project pursuant to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay at the following density and subject to
the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended, to permit the following: up to 590,265 square feet of
specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up
to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800
parking spaces. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay encompasses District A and the portion of the Parking District
(East Parking Area)/CR Overlay south of Disney Way.
Note No. 2: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of approximately 582 acres within the
C-R (Commercial Recreation) District which allows for hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as
restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities; the PR (Public Recreation) District which encompasses the
Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities and provides for the orderly use of City-owned property
as well as the existing Anaheim Hilton Hotel; the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay which encompasses existing
mobilehome parks within the C-R District and provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations
and procedures to mitigate relocation concerns and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when
a park is converted to another land use; and, the Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay, which applies to focused
areas of the Specific Plan and provides for the incorporation of residential uses into hotel developments when such
uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300-room full-service hotel. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan also
identifies maximum development density designations in the C-R District. These designations are based upon
hotel/motel development and allow up to 20% of each hotel/motel project gross square footage, excluding parking
facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main hotel/motel complex) accessory uses. These
accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotel/motel density at the rate of one hotel/motel room
per six hundred (600) gross square feet of accessory use. For properties proposed to be developed with permitted
and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels/motels with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics
of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel/motel (including accessory uses)
density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval.
The density designations are as follows: “Low Density,” which has a maximum density of up to 50 rooms per gross
acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; “Low-Medium Density,” up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75
rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; “Low-Medium Density (Modified),” up to 252 rooms and 75,593 square
feet of accessory uses; “Medium Density,” up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever
is greater; and, “Convention Center (CC) Medium Density,” up to 125 rooms per gross acre with trip generation
characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is
greater. For those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceed the maximum density
designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Ordinance
may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density. For projects that are developed in accordance with the Anaheim
Resort Residential Overlay, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed shall be less than the number of hotel
rooms proposed and such projects shall not create infrastructure impacts greater than the subject property’s
permitted hotel/motel density, as permitted by the property’s underlying C-R District density designation unless
otherwise mitigated through subsequent environmental analysis.
-3- PC2012-***
EXHIBIT "B"
FIGURE LU-4: LAND USE PLAN
OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
-4- PC2012-***
EXHIBIT "C"
FIGURE C-5: EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES
OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
-5- PC2012-***
EXHIBIT "D"
FIGURE G-1: GREEN PLAN
OF THE GREEN ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3
-1- PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL AMEND TABLE 20-D (DEVELOPMENT
INTENSITIES: PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU)
OVERLAY ZONE) OF SECTION 18.20.040 (DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTS) OF CHAPTER 18.20 OF TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND MAKING FINDINGS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH (ZONING CODE AMENDMENT
NO. 2012-00107).
(DEV2012-00059)
WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the
confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west
of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison
easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel
Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim
Amtrak/Metrolink Station, and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light
industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail
development; and
WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council")
has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim
(hereinafter referred to as the "Planning Commission") certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel
Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No.
120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of
urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot
exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development and 15,570 on-site parking spaces.
The Grove of Anaheim, the renovated Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building
were developed/renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area
Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP "). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as
those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to
the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part
of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental
Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development
within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay
Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the
-2- PC2012-***
provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports,
entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including
increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a
net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new
office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space.
Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena
Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide
General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
The General Plan Update changed the General Plan designations within the project area from
Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High,
Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to
transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also
established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which
permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet
of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50, and
institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats
allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area
Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use
designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, which was prepared for the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development
intensities on a citywide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including an
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle
(collectively referred to herein as "FEIR No. 330"); and
WHEREAS, in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s
new vision for the Platinum Triangle, on August 17, 2004, the City Council replaced the MLUP
with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP "), replaced the SE Overlay
Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved
the form of the Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved
associated zoning reclassifications. Under these updated zoning regulations, property owners
desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter
into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and the updated and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 332”) to provide for the implementation of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and in conjunction with its consideration and approval
of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning
Code Amendment No. 2004-00036 and a series of related actions that, collectively, allowed for
an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500
residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial
uses; and
WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved
two addendums to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle
-3- PC2012-***
intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square
feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase
the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total
allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to up to 10,266 residential units,
5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the
General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized
Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable
development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847
square feet of commercial uses,16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet
of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 334”) in conjunction with its consideration and
approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089,
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to
provide for the implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and approval of
the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, in response to the application of K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L
Anaheim Properties II LLC (collectively referred to herein as "K/L") for entitlements allowing
for the development of a master planned mixed-use project comprised of, among other uses, a
320-unit residential condominium project, a 209,419 square foot twelve-story office building,
including a 5,586 square foot full-service restaurant, 4,381 square feet of retail space, and a
104,604 square foot 138-room hotel (the "Original Project") on real property consisting of
approximately 7.01 acres commonly known as 905 through 917 East Katella Avenue in the City
of Anaheim (the "Property"), the City Council determined on June 10, 2008 that FSEIR No. 334,
including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106B for the PTMLUP and
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 153, served as the appropriate environmental documentation for
the Original Project, including Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05304 and Development
Agreement No. 2008-00002 (the "Development Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6106 approving
the Development Agreement; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05304 and
the Development Agreement, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334.
In consideration of the City’s exemplary historical record in avoiding litigation under the
California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and its commitment to proper environmental
review, the City Council repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project,
including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
-4- PC2012-***
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2010, the City Council approved amendments to the General
Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No.
2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the
allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone to up to 18,909 residential
units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and
1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning
reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project and Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C
(collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339") ; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No.
1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5
Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162
of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact
report had occurred; and
WHEREAS, Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Shopoff"), has
entered into an agreement with K/L to purchase the Property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority conferred upon Shopoff by K/L and in accordance
with Section 21 of the Development Agreement and Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code (the "Code"), Shopoff submitted to the City a request to modify the site design and product
type of the Original Project, consisting of an increase in the number of dwelling units from 320
to 399 residential apartment units, a reduction in the amount of office and commercial
development, the addition of a public park (the "Platinum Gateway Project"). To that end,
Shopoff has requested the following entitlements:
(a) that the Development Agreement be amended and restated in the form of the
proposed First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2008-00002
(Development Agreement No. 2008-00002D) (the "Amended and Restated
Development Agreement") presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was
adopted;
(b) that the General Plan be amended to modify "Table LU-4: General Plan
Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City" to increase the number of
dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development
allowed within the Mixed-Use land use designation of the Platinum Triangle Area
and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a
public park ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486");
(c) that the Zoning Code be amended to make the Zoning Code consistent with
General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486, as adopted ("Zoning Code
Amendment No. 2012-00107");
(d) that (i) Chapter 1, Table 1-General Plan Development Intensities, (ii) Chapter
1, Figure 3 (General Plan Designations), (iii) Chapter 2, Figure 4 (Platinum
Triangle Urban Design Plan), (iv) Chapter 3, Figure 5 (Mixed Use and Office
-5- PC2012-***
Districts), and (v) Chapter 4, Figure 20 (Landscape Concept Plan) of the Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan be amended (herein referred to interchangeably as
"Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559" or the "PTMLUP Amendments"); and
(e) that Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 be approved.
WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated Development Agreement, General Plan
Amendment No. 2012-00486, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107, Miscellaneous Case
No. 2012-00559 and Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 shall be referred to herein collectively as
the "Entitlements"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has heretofore approved Final Site Plan No. 2012-
00008 ("Final Site Plan") to provide for the development of the Platinum Gateway Project,
contingent upon the approval of the proposed Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107 would make the
Zoning Code consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486, as adopted, by
amending and restating Table 20-D (Development Intensities:
Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of Section 18.20.040 (Development
Districts) of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of Title 18 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code; and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, this Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law
and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and
considered information presented by City staff and evidence for and against the proposed
Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of a separate resolution concurrently with but prior in time to
this Resolution, this Planning Commission has heretofore found and determined and has
recommended that the City Council so find and determine that FSEIR No. 339, together with
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 307, Addendum No. 1, and a subsequent Addendum to FSEIR
No. 339, which has been prepared in connection with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project
("Addendum No. 2"), serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed
Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA; (ii)
none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the
preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report have occurred in connection with the
proposed Platinum Gateway Project and/or the Entitlements; and (iii) no further environmental
documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project
and/or the Entitlements and all other actions authorized by this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself,
and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, this Planning
Commission has heretofore adopted its Resolution recommending that the City Council amend
the General Plan by approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486; and
-6- PC2012-***
WHEREAS, in order to make the Zoning Code consistent with General Plan Amendment
No. 2012-00486, as adopted, this Planning Commission desires to recommend that the City
Council approve and adopt proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107 in the form
attached hereto as Exhibit A.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, this Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve
and adopt proposed Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107 in the form attached hereto as
Exhibit A, contingent upon and subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2012-
00486.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Shopoff is responsible for paying all charges related
to the processing of this discretionary case application within fifteen (15) days of the issuance of
the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this
application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 3, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
“Zoning Provisions - General” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-7- PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Secretary for the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning
Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT "A"
PROPOSED ORDINANCE
ORDINANCE NO.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
TABLE 20-D (DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES:
PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY
ZONE) OF SECTION 18.20.040 (DEVELOPMENT
DISTRICTS) OF CHAPTER 18.20 OF TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE.
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HEREBY ORDAINS AS
FOLLOWS:
SECTION 1.
That Table 20-D (DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES:
PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE) of Section 18.20.040
(DEVELOPMENT DISTRICTS) of Chapter 18.20 (PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE
(PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is
hereby, amended and restated to read as follows:
Table 20-D
DEVELOPMENT INTENSITIES:
PLATINUM TRIANGLE MIXED USE (PTMU) OVERLAY ZONE
District Acres Maximum
Housing Units
Maximum Office
Square Feet
Maximum
Commercial Square
Feet
Maximum
Institutional
Square Feet
Arena 41 425 100,000 100,000 0
ARTIC 17 520 2,202,803 358,000 1,500,000
Gateway 50 2,949 562,250 64,000 0
Gene Autry 33 2,362 338,200 304,700 0
Katella 141 5,786 1,921,639 694,643 0
Orangewood 35 1,771 1,402,855 130,000 0
Stadium 153 5,175 3,125,000 3,120,368 0
Total Mixed
Use
470 18,988 9,652,747 4,795,111 1,500,000
Office 121 0 4.478,356 0 0
Total PTMU
Overlay
591 18,988 14,131,103 4,795,111 1,500,000
SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby declares that should any section,
subsection, paragraph, sentence, clause or word of this ordinance hereby adopted be declared for
any reason invalid by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, it is the intent of
the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this ordinance independent of
the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared invalid.
SECTION 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE.
Neither the adoption of this ordinance nor the repeal of any other ordinance of this
City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances which violations
were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any license or
penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof. The provisions of this
ordinance, insofar as they are substantially the same as ordinance provisions previously adopted
by the City relating to the same subject matter, shall be construed as restatements and
continuations, and not as new enactments.
THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the
City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the ____ day of ______________, 2012, and
thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of
______________, 201__, by the following roll call vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
ABSTAIN:
CITY OF ANAHEIM
By: __________________________________
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
______________________________________
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
92509.2
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 5
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
DETERMINING THAT THE PREVIOUSLY-CERTIFIED
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339, TOGETHER WITH
THE UPDATED AND MODIFIED MITIGATION MONITORING
PROGRAM NO. 106C FOR THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE,
MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN NO. 306, AND ADDENDUM NO.
1 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339, SERVE AS
THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR
THE PLATINUM VISTA PROJECT AND REQUIRED AND RELATED
DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002 (DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002B) BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
(DEV2012-00060)
WHEREAS, pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6090 by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim ("City Council") on January 8, 2008, the City of Anaheim, on the one hand, and
the Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Trust, Dated January 7, 1989, the Marshall
Family Trust, Dated February 14, 2000, and See Development Limited Partnership (collectively
referred to herein as "Marshall/See"), on the other hand, entered into that certain Development
Agreement No. 2007-00002, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of
Orange, California ("Official Records") on March 20, 2008, as Instrument No. 2008000129034
(the “Development Agreement”) with respect to that certain real property consisting of
approximately 4.13 acres and commonly known as 1005 through 1105 East Katella Avenue in
the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, which real property is generally
depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and more particularly described in Exhibit B
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Development Agreement provided for development of a 327-unit mixed
use residential condominium project with a 9,500 square foot full-service restaurant with an
outdoor dining area. In addition to the Development Agreement, the City Council approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-05248 to permit the sales and consumption of alcoholic
beverages within a full-service restaurant and Tentative Tract Map No. 17186 to establish a 2-lot
(1 lettered and 1 numbered) residential subdivision (the "Original Project"); and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2008 and prior to its adoption of Ordinance No. 6090 and the
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2007-05248, the City Council found and determined that
FSEIR No. 334, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106B for the
PTMLUP and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 153, served as the appropriate environmental
documentation for the Original Project; and
- 2 - PC2012-***
WHEREAS, by the adoption of Ordinance No. 6246 on June 5, 2012, the City Council
approved Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement 2007-00002 ("Amendment No. 1") to
extend the Term of, and provide for other modifications to, the Development Agreement.
Amendment No. 1 was recorded in the Official Records on June 14, 2012 as Instrument No.
2012000337873. The Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to
herein collectively as the "Development Agreement"; and
WHEREAS, Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Shopoff"), has
entered into an agreement with Marshall/See to purchase the Property. Under the authority set
forth in Section 65865 of the California Government Code, the Shopoff possesses an equitable
interest in and to the Property and is, therefore, authorized to enter into a Development
Agreement with the City for the Property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority conferred upon Shopoff by K/L and in accordance
with Section 21 of the Development Agreement and Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code (the "Code"), Shopoff submitted to the City a request to modify the site design and product
type of the Original Project, consisting of an increase in the number of dwelling units from 327
to 350 residential apartment units and a reduction in the amount of office and commercial
development (the "Platinum Vista Project"). To that end, Shopoff has requested the following
entitlements:
(a) that the Development Agreement be amended and restated in the form of the
proposed First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2007-00002
(Development Agreement No. 2007-00002B) (the "Amended and Restated
Development Agreement") presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was
adopted; and
(b) that Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 be approved.
WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated Development Agreement and Tentative Tract
Map No. 17494 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Entitlements"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has heretofore approved Final Site Plan No. 2012-
00007 ("Final Site Plan") to provide for the development of the Platinum Vista Project,
contingent upon the approval of the proposed Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
conducted a public hearing for the proposed Entitlements at the Civic Center in the City of
Anaheim on December 3, 2012, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code,
and considered information presented by City staff and evidence for and against said proposed
entitlements; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that (i) FSEIR No. 339,
together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 306 and Addendum No. 1, serve as the
- 3 - PC2012-***
appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed Platinum Vista Project and the
Entitlements and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent
environmental impact report have occurred in connection with the proposed Platinum Vista
Project and/or the Entitlements; and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be
prepared under CEQA for the proposed Platinum Vista Project and/or the Entitlements and all
other actions authorized by this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the
testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine that the
proposed Amended and Restated Development in the form presented at this meeting meets all of
the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”), which was
adopted by the City Council on November 23, 1982; that is:
1. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is consistent with
the City’s General Plan in that it is in conformance with the General Plan Mixed Use land use
designation for the Property and with the goals, policies, programs and objectives specified in the
General Plan.
2. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is compatible with
the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district in which
the Project is and will be located, and is consistent with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use
Overlay requirements.
3. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is compatible with
the orderly development of property in the surrounding area in that it is in conformance with and
implements the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone requirements.
4. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is not otherwise
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. The approval of the proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement
constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power and authority under the
Procedures Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, this Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council take
the following action:
1. Find and determine that that (i) FSEIR No. 339, together with Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 306 and Addendum No. 1, serve as the appropriate environmental
documentation for the proposed Platinum Vista Project and the Entitlements and satisfy all of the
requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State
CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report have
occurred in connection with the proposed the Platinum Gateway Project and/or the Entitlements;
- 4 - PC2012-***
and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the
proposed Platinum Gateway Project and/or the Entitlements and all other actions authorized by
this Resolution; and
2. Approve and adopt the proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement
in the form presented at this meeting.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each
and all of the conditions set forth in the proposed Amended and Restated Development
Agreement, which are also set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto. Should said conditions, or any
part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by a final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proposed Amended and Restated Development
Agreement be approved contingent upon and subject to the approval by the City Council of
Tentative Tract Map No. 17494.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 3, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
“Zoning Provisions - General” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 5 - PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 6 - PC2012-***
- 7 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT "B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
PARCEL NO. 1:
PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42
INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
[Assessor's Parcel No. 082-261-27]
PARCEL NO. 2:
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42
INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
[Assessor's Parcel No. 082-261-28]
- 8 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “C”
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NO. 2007-00002
PLATINUM VISTA APARTMENTS
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002B)
(DEV2012-00060)
NOTE: Mitigation Measures (“MM”), from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 306 are
incorporated into these conditions of approval and are identified by the mitigation
measure number below applicable condition numbers.
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED
OFF BY
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT OR DEMOLITION PERMITS
1
(MM2-3)
Prior to approval of each grading plan (for
Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit Demolition
and Import/Export Plans detailing construction
and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste
reduction measures to be implemented to recover
C&D materials. These plans shall include
identification of off-site locations for materials
export from the project and options for disposal of
excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent
site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a
project in the vicinity or transport to an
environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts
made to move it within Orange County. The
property owner/developer shall offer recyclable
building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for
sale or removal by private firms or public agencies
for use in construction of other projects if not all
can be reused at the project site.
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
2 Prior to issuance of the grading permit and right-of-
way construction permit for the storm drain and
sewer, whichever occurs first, a Save Harmless
agreement in-lieu of an Encroachment Agreement is
required to be executed, approved by the City and
recorded by the applicant on the property for any
storm drains connecting to a City storm drain.
Development
Services
- 9 - PC2012-***
3
(MM 3-2)
At least 90 days prior to the initiation of grading
activities, for projects greater than one acre,
coverage for the project must be obtained by
electronically submitting permit registration
documents to the State or obtaining coverage via
current general construction permit prescribed
method by the property owner/developer pursuant
to State and Federal National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As
part of the NOI, a Surface Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The
property owner/developer shall also prepare and
submit to the Development Services Division of
the Public Works Department, a Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with
the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and
Chapter 7 of the Orange County Drainage Area
Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved
prior to issuance of grading permit. The SWPPP,
in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the
structural and nonstructural BMPs that will be
implemented during construction (short-term)
within the Project Area as well as BMPs for long-
term operation of the Project Area that address
potential impacts to surface waters.
Building Division
4
(MM10-1)
The City Engineer shall review the location of
each project to determine if it is located within an
area served by deficient sewer facilities, as
identified in the latest updated sewer study for the
Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase
sewer flows beyond those programmed in the
appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or
if the project currently discharges to an existing
deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency
in an existing sewer line, the property
owner/developer shall be required to guarantee
mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the
area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
City Attorney’s Office. Prior to issuance of a
grading permit the sewer plans shall be submitted
for review. Prior to issuance of a building permit
for each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer
Development
Services
- 10 - PC2012-***
study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the project area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
thereof.
5
(MM10-3)
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each
development project, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall contact Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding
sewer capacity. Additionally, if requested by the
OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place
up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a
month to verify capacity and ensure consistency
with the OCSD’s modeling results.
Development
Services
6 Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the
OWNER shall demonstrate that coverage has been
obtained under California’s General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with
Construction Activity by providing a copy of the
Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water
Resources Control Board and a copy of the
subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste
Discharge Identification (WDID) number. The
owner shall prepare and implement a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the
current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and
be available for City review on request.
Development
Services
7
(MM10-8)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit,
the property owner/developer shall provide
engineering studies, including network analysis, to
size the water mains for ultimate development
within the project. This includes detailed water
usage analysis and building plans for Public
Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval
in determining project water requirements and
appropriate water assessment fees.
Water Engineering
Division
8
(MM10-9)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation meter when the
Water Engineering
- 11 - PC2012-***
total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet.
(City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
9 The property owner shall comply with Rule 15D
of the Water Utilities Rates, Rules, and
Regulations and pay all applicable water
assessment fees.
Water Engineering
10
(MM10-13)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans water
efficient design features including, but not limited
to (as applicable to the type of development at
issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals,
automatic on and off water faucets, and water
efficient appliances.
Resource Efficiency
11
(MM10-14)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation lines and use
recycled water when it becomes available. All
irrigation systems shall be designed so that they
will function properly with recycled water. The
property owner/developer shall contact the Public
Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division,
for recycled water system requirements and
specific water conservation measures to be
incorporated into the building and landscape
construction plans.
Water Engineering
12
(MM10-17)
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall
review the location of each project to determine if
it is located within an area served by deficient
drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan
of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove
Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the
project will increase stormwater flows beyond
those programmed in the appropriate master plan
drainage study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient storm
drain system or will create a deficiency in an
existing storm drain, the property owner/developer
shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the
impact to adequately serve the area to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Development
Services
- 12 - PC2012-***
Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer
shall be required to install the drainage facilities,
as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the
impacts of the proposed development based upon
the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones
of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East
Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary
Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of
public improvements by the City or final Building
and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure,
whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property
owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
thereof.
13 Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the property
owner shall submit a final drainage report and
project improvement plans that incorporate the
required drainage improvements and the
mechanisms proposed in the Drainage Report. No
offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after
grading operations or perimeter wall construction.
Development
Services
14 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property
owner/developer shall submit plans documenting
that the design of all aboveground structures (with
the exception of parking structures) shall be at
least one foot higher that the 100-year flood zone,
where applicable, unless otherwise required by the
City Engineer. All structures below this level shall
be floodproofed to prevent damage to property or
harm to people.
Development
Services
15
(MM 10-20)
Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for
import/export plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for demolition plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit a
Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if
determined to be necessary by the Public Works
Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or
Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall
include identification of off-site locations for
material export from the project and options for
disposal of excess material. These options may
Streets and Sanitation
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
- 13 - PC2012-***
include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a
broker or contractor, sale to a project in the
vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared
landfill, with attempts made to move it within
Orange County. The property owner/developer
shall offer recyclable building materials, such as
asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private
firms or public agencies for use in construction of
other projects, if all cannot be reused on the
project site.
16
(MM10-23)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Relocate Southern California Edison
transmission line underground on
Katella Avenue from west of the Union
Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850
feet).
• Relocate Southern California Edison
communication line underground on
Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to
east of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet
west of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• Relocate distribution circuits
underground on Katella Avenue from
Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State
College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Electrical
Engineering
- 14 - PC2012-***
Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim
Way to State College Boulevard (1,500
feet).
• Relocation a distribution circuit
underground on Orangewood Avenue
from State College Boulevard to west of
the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Lewis
Street from Katella Avenue to Gene
Autry Way (950 feet).
• Relocate a distribution circuit
underground on Douglas Street from
Katella Avenue to Cerritos Avenue
(1,000 feet).
17
(MM10-25)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Two new distribution duct banks on
Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to
Lewis Street (800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell
Avenue (2,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on State
Electrical
Engineering
- 15 - PC2012-***
College Boulevard from Cerritos
Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the
Santa Ana River (4,800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from Haster Street to the
east side of I-5 (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,400 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Lewis
Street and Santa Cruz Street from
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on the east
side of the Angel Stadium parking lot
from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57
(2,000 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road
from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue (4,000 feet).
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
18
(MM2-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence that high-solids or water-based low
emissions paints and coatings are utilized in the
design and construction of buildings, in
compliance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s regulations. This
information shall be denoted on the project plans
and specifications. Additionally, the property
owner/developer’s shall specify the use of high-
volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand
application. Air-atomized spray techniques shall
not be permitted. Plans shall also show that
property owner/developers shall construct/build
with materials that do not require painting, or use
prepainted construction materials, to the extent
feasible.
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
19 The property owner/architect shall submit energy
- 16 - PC2012-***
(MM2-6)
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with
the performance approach to the California Energy
Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that
shows each new structure exceeds the applicable
Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a
minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building
permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as
vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof
temperatures significantly during the
summer and; therefore, reduce the energy
requirement for air conditioning. Examples
of energy efficient building materials and
suppliers can be found at the following
website: http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or
other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-
colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous
pavement, for all roadways and walkways
not within the public right-of-way, to
minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its
surrounding environment. Examples of
cool pavement materials are available at:
http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html
or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the
existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy
efficient appliances (e.g., EnergyStar®
appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering
window coatings or double-paned
windows.
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all
commercial structures encompassing over
50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within
close proximity to the building structure to
reduce heat load and resulting energy
usage at residential, commercial, and
office.
Building Division
- 17 - PC2012-***
20
(MM5-1)
Prior to approval of street improvement plans for
any project-related roadway widening, the City
shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design
project acoustical features that will limit traffic
noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are
below the City’s noise ordinance. These
treatments shall be noted on the street
improvement plans to the satisfaction of the
Planning Department and may include, but are not
limited to, the replacement of windows and doors
at existing residences with acoustically rated
windows and doors.
Development
Services
Building Division
21
(MM5-2)
The project property owner/developers shall
submit a final acoustical report prepared to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report
shall show that the development will be sound-
attenuated against present and projected noise
levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter,
stationary sources (e.g., industrial, commercial,
stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior
noise standards as follows:
a) The report shall demonstrate that the
proposed residential design will result in
compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior
noise levels, as required by the California
Building Code and California Noise
Insulation Standards (Title 24 and 25 of the
California Code of Regulations).
b) The report shall demonstrate that the
Proposed Project residential design shall
minimize nighttime awakening from
stadium event noise and train horns such
that interior single-event noise levels are
below 81 dBA Lmax.
The property owner/developer shall submit the
noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for
review and approval. Upon approval by the City,
the project acoustical design features shall be
incorporated into construction of the Proposed
Project.
Building Division
22
(MM5-5)
To reduce noise and vibration impacts from the
impact pile driver, the construction contractor
shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast
piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct
Building Division
- 18 - PC2012-***
cast-in-place piles for a pile-supported transfer
slab foundation system. This alternative
construction method would reduce the duration
necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or
eliminate the need to use pile drivers altogether.
Proof of compliance with this measure shall be
submitted to the Planning Department in the form
of a letter from the construction contractor.
23
(MM7-1)
Plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have
fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim
Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed
by the property owner/developer prior to each
final Building and Zoning inspection.
Fire Department
24
(MM7-2)
The property owner/developer shall pay the Public
Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time,
for fire facilities and equipment impact fees
identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter
17.36.
Fire Department
25
(MM7-3)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
to the Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval for the purpose of incorporating safety
measures in the project design including
implementation of Ordinance 6016 and the concept
of crime prevention through environmental design
(i.e., building design, circulation, site planning and
lighting of parking structure and parking areas).
Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking
structures (for the police helicopter). Minimum
size for numbers shall be four feet in height and
two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall
be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches
apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to
the parking structure and shall face the street to
which the structure is addressed.
Police Department
26
(MM7-4)
For a parking structure, the property
owner/developer shall submit plans to the
Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval indicating the provision of closed circuit
monitoring and recording or other substitute
security measures as may be approved by the
Anaheim Police Department. Said measures shall
be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning
inspections.
Police Department
- 19 - PC2012-***
27
(MM7-5)
The property owner/developer shall submit design
plans that shall include parking lots and parking
structures with controlled access points to limit
ingress and egress if determined to be necessary
by the Anaheim Police Department, and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim
Police Department.
Police Department
28
(MM7-9)
The property owner/developer shall pay the school
impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of
the Anaheim Union High School District and
Anaheim City School District in compliance with
Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section
65995 [b][3] as amended).
Community
Development
Building Division
29
(MM9-4)
The property owner/developer shall pay the
appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees,
Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
Traffic and
Transportation
30
(MM9-5)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan.
Traffic and
Transportation
31
(MM 9-6)
Any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak
hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic
Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property
owner/developers shall prepare traffic
improvement phasing analyses to identify when
the improvements identified in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic
Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010
(Appendix F of this SEIR) shall be designed and
constructed. The Development Agreement
Traffic and
Transportation
- 20 - PC2012-***
Conditions of Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to implement traffic
improvements as identified in the project traffic
study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as
defined by the City’s General Plan, based on
thresholds of significance, performance standards
and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339,
Orange County Congestion Management Program
and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study
Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses
will specify the timing, funding, construction and
fair share responsibilities for all traffic
improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory
levels of service within the City of Anaheim and
surrounding jurisdictions. The Development
Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require
the property owner/developer to construct, bond
for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary
circulation system improvements, as determined
by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager,
unless alternative funding sources have been
identified.
32
(MM9-7)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners
/developers will analyze to determine when the
intersection improvements shall be constructed,
subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation
Measure 9-6 of Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
106C.
The improvement phasing analyses will specify
the timing, funding, construction and fair-share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements
necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service
within the City of Anaheim and surrounding
jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-share calculations
shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-
way, a nd construction costs, unless alternative
funding sources have been identified to help pay
for the improvement.
The Development Agreement Conditions of
Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter
into a funding agreement for necessary circulation
Traffic and
Transportation
- 21 - PC2012-***
system improvements, as determined by the City
Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless
alternative funding sources have been identified.
33
(MM9-8)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions
shall be taken in cooperation with the City of
Orange:
a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis
shall identify any impacts created by the
project on facilities within the City of
Orange. The fair-share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
shall be calculated in this analysis.
b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the
cost of the project’s fair-share
responsibility in cooperation with the City
of Orange.
c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of
Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City of
Anaheim shall hold the amount received in
trust, and then, once a mutually agreed
upon joint program is executed by both
cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate
the fair-share contribution to traffic
mitigation programs that result in improved
traffic flow at the impacted locations, via
an agreement mutually acceptable to both
cities.
d) The City shall work with the City of
Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure the
fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial
and intersection impacts in the City of
Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible.
Traffic and
Transportation
34
(MM9-9)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a
regional transportation agency has not already
programmed and funded the warranted
improvements to the impacted freeway mainline
or freeway ramp locations, property
owners/developers and the City will take the
following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
Traffic and
Transportation
- 22 - PC2012-***
a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s
proportionate impact on the specific
freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp
locations and its fair share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
based on thresholds of significance,
performance standards and methodologies
utilized in SEIR No. 339 and established in
the Orange County Congestion
Management Program and City of
Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines.
b) The City shall estimate the cost of the
project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
35
(MM9-10)
Prior to the approval of a building permit the
property owner/developer shall pay the identified
fair-share responsibility as determined by the City
as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow on the
impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City.
Traffic and
Transportation
36
(MM9-11)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of
impacts generated by the project.
Traffic and
Transportation
37
(MM9-14)
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for
each building, the property owner/developer shall
pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment
Fees, Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
Traffic and
Transportation
Division
- 23 - PC2012-***
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
38
(MM9-15)
The property owner/developer shall meet with the
Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine
whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed
adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is
required, it shall be placed in a location that least
impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the
Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the
approval of the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA).
Traffic and
Transportation
Orange County
Transportation
Authority (OCTA)
39
(MM10-4)
Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for
each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade
structures of the proposed development based upon
the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum
Triangle. Where requested by the City Engineer,
sewer improvements shall be constructed with
larger than recommended diameter to maintain the
surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert
elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above
the hydraulic grade line elevation of the surcharge
levels when they are above the pipe crown.
Public Works
Department,
Development
Services Division
40
(MM10-6)
Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional
analysis shall be performed using flow, wet-
weather data, and other information specific for that
project in order to obtain more accurate results of
the surcharge levels for final design.
Development
Services
41
(MM10-7)
Landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance
with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape
Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in
compliance with the State of California Model
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the
project are the following:
• Use of water-conserving landscape plant
materials wherever feasible;
• Use of vacuums and other equipment to
reduce the use of water for wash down of
Resource Efficiency
Public Works,
Development
Services
- 24 - PC2012-***
exterior areas;
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment
including low flush toilets and urinals;
• Use of self-closing valves for drinking
fountains;
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as
drip irrigation and automatic systems
which use moisture sensors;
• Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and
urinals;
• Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at
night, when evaporation rates are lowest;
• Water-efficient dishwashers, clothes
washers, and other water using
appliances;
• Cooling tower recirculating system;
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in
irrigation system;
• Use of waterway recirculation systems;
• Provide information to the public in
conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
• Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and
washdown when it becomes available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and
building plans, the applicant shall identify which
of these measures have been incorporated into the
plans.
42
(MM 10-12)
Submitted landscape plans for all residential,
office and commercial landscaping shall
demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant
materials pursuant to the publication entitled
“Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by
the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000.
Resource Efficiency
43
(MM10-18)
The property owner/developer shall submit project
plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the
Public Works Department for review and approval
to ensure that the plans comply with AB939, and
the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the
County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated
Waste Management Plans as administered by the
Streets and Sanitation
- 25 - PC2012-***
City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan
shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain
in full effect as required by the Street and
Sanitation Division and may include, at its
discretion, the following plan components:
• Detailing the locations and design of on-
site recycling facilities.
• Participating in the City of Anaheim’s
“Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by
the City or governing agency.
• Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially
in retail areas) by providing adequate space
and centralized locations for collection and
bailing.
• Providing trash compactors for non-
recyclable materials whenever feasible to
reduce the total volume of solid waste and
number of trips required for collection.
• Providing on-site recycling receptacles
accessible to the public to encourage
recycling for all businesses, employees,
and patrons where feasible.
• Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies
with federal, state, and city regulations.
44
(MM 10-21)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
showing that each structure will exceed the State
Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential
Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California
Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent
and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public
Utilities Department Business and Community
Programs Division. This consultation shall take
place during project design in order to review Title
24 measures that are incorporated into the project
design energy efficient practices and allow
potential system alternatives such as thermal
energy storage air-conditioning, lighting, and
building envelope options. Plans submitted for
building permits shall show the proposed energy
efficiencies and systems alternatives.
Business and
Community
Programs
45 The property owner/developer shall indicate on Business and
- 26 - PC2012-***
(MM 10-22) plans energy-saving practices that will be
implemented with the project in compliance with
Title 24, which may include the following:
• High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS
(computer) control.
• Variable Air Volume (VAV) air
distribution.
• Outside air (100 percent) economizer
cycle.
• Staged compressors or variable speed
drives to flow varying thermal loads.
• Isolated HVAC zone control by
floors/separable activity areas.
• Specification of premium-efficiency
electric motors (i.e., compressor motors,
air-handling units, and fan-coil units).
• Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate
spaces.
• Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
• Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
• Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit
signage.
• Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts
where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
• Use of lighting power controllers in
association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity
discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots.
• Consideration of thermal energy storage air
conditioning for spaces or facilities that
may require air-conditioning during
summer, day-peak periods.
• Consideration for participation in
Advantage Services Programs such as:
o New construction design review, in
which the City cost-shares
engineering for up to $15,000 for
design of energy efficient buildings
and systems.
o New Construction – Cash
incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per
Community
Programs
- 27 - PC2012-***
kWh saved for each measure and up
to $200,000 per facility for efficiency
that exceed Title 24 requirements.
o Green Building Program – Offers
accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees
and free technical assistance.
• Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons
per flush [gpf] or less).
• Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0
gpf to 0.25 gpf).
• Use of weather-based irrigation controllers
for outdoor irrigation.
Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in
outdoor landscaping.
46
(MM 10-24)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
for review and approval which shall ensure that
buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency
Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24,
Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code)
by a minimum of 10 percent.
Business and
Community
Programs
47
(MM10-26)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, the property owner/developer shall
provide an electrical load analysis to the City of
Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD).
The analysis shall include a load schedule and
maximum electrical coincident demand. Should
the property owner/developer’s load analysis
result in a contributed load forecasted to exceed 20
MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the
electrical system currently serving the Platinum
Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction
of a new electrical substation within the Platinum
Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees for the electrical substation
will be assessed in accordance with the Electric
Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial
mechanism approved by the City design features.
Electrical
Engineering
48 The property owner/developer shall submit a plan
to the Water Engineering Division of the Public
Utilities Department showing the individual water
service installations required to serve each
building, including locations of proposed large
Water Engineering
- 28 - PC2012-***
meters with easements, small meters, and fire lines
with backflow devices. The plan shall
demonstrate that all backflow devices will be
located aboveground outside the street setback
area in a manner fully screened from all public
streets and in locations approved by the Public
Utilities Department and the Planning Department.
The plans shall also demonstrate that any existing
water services, fire lines, and backflow devices
conform to current Water Utility Standards and/or
existing water services and/or fire lines that are
not approved for continued use by Water
Engineering shall be upgraded to current
standards, or abandoned, if no longer needed, by
the property owner/developer.
49 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property
owner/developer shall pay his project’s
proportionate share of the cost to prepare the
Water Supply Assessment for the Platinum
Triangle SEIR No. 339.
Water Engineering
50 The Owner shall submit a water system master
plan, including hydraulic distribution network
analysis and estimates of the maximum required
fire flow rate and the maximum day and peak hour
water demands for the development to the Water
Engineering Division of the Public Utilities
Department for review and approval. The master
plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the
proposed on-site water system to meet the
project’s water demands and fire protection
requirements without reducing existing service
levels or impacting any existing water supply or
conveyance facilities. Any off-site water system
improvements required to serve the project shall
be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the
Water Utility Rates, Rules and Regulations.
Water Engineering
51
A water improvement plan shall be submitted to
the Water Engineering Division for approval and a
performance bond in the amount approved by the
City Engineer and form approved by City
Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim
Water Engineering
52 All requests for new water services or fire lines, as
well as any modifications, relocations, or
abandonments of existing water services and fire
Water Engineering
- 29 - PC2012-***
lines, shall be coordinated through Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
53 Prior to issuance of a building permit it the
following shall be determined:
1) No public water mains or public water
facilities shall be installed in any alleys or
paseos.
2) No water mains or laterals allowed under
parking stalls.
3) Separate services shall be installed for
domestic and fire water.
4) All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be
metered with a UL listed meter, Hershey
Residential Fire Meter with Translator
Register, no equals.
5) Large water meters shall be located on
private property in an easement, outside of
the setback area.
6) Lead-free backflow prevention assemblies
meeting the City of Anaheim’s current
standards shall be installed at all domestic
water service meters. Backflow prevention
assemblies meeting the City of Anaheim’s
current standards shall be installed at all
fire and irrigation services. Additionally,
the location and type of all meters and
backflow prevention assemblies shall be
subject to the review and approval of
Anaheim Water Engineering during the
final design stage.
7) Although the conceptual water system
layout is acceptable to Anaheim Water
Engineering, the final alignment and layout
shall be subject to the review and approval
of Anaheim Water Engineering during the
final design phase.
Water Engineering
54 Owner/developer shall acquire and provide an
easement to the City of Anaheim for all locations
where public water main crosses Orange County
Flood Control District Right-of-Way and facilities
(both existing AND proposed flood facilities). The
City will cooperate and assist in the acquisition of
Water Engineering
- 30 - PC2012-***
the easement.
55 The City’s grant easement deed language
requirements (i.e., City is ONLY responsible for
replacing asphalt paving when it makes repairs or
replacements to public water facilities in private
streets, it is NOT responsible for slurry sealing,
replacing concrete, pavers, or any other decorative
hardscape, walls, or landscaping) shall be included
in easement deeds for all public water facilities
located on private property.
Water Engineering
56 The applicant shall demonstrate to the City that
adequate water supply exists to serve the Proposed
Project. If it cannot be demonstrated that adequate
water exists to serve the specific project, the
project shall not be approved.
Water Engineering
57 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the
entrances of parking lots/structures and located in
other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’
x 1’ in overall size, with white background and
black 2” lettering.
Police Department
58 All entrances to parking areas should be posted
with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C. to
assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owner’s/manager’s request.
Police Department
59
The proposed project shall comply with all State
Energy Insulation Standards and City of Anaheim
codes in effect at the time of application for
building permits. (Commonly referred to as Title
24, these standards are updated periodically to
allow consideration and possible incorporation of
new energy efficiency technologies and methods.)
Electrical
Engineering
60 Prior to approval of permits for improvement
plans, the property owner/developer shall
coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish
electrical service requirements and submit electric
system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans,
elevation plans, and related technical drawings and
specifications.
Electrical
Engineering
61 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be
painted red to prohibit parallel parking in the drive
Transportation and
Traffic
- 31 - PC2012-***
aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled
on building plans.
62 That prior to issuance of building permits, plans
shall specifically indicate that all vehicular ramps
and grades conform to all applicable Engineering
Standards.
Traffic and
Transportation
63 That prior to issuance of the a building permit for
the parking structure, plans shall demonstrate that
at-grade ducts and overhead pipes shall not
encroach in the parking space areas or required
vehicle clearance areas.
Traffic and
Transportation
64 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
final map shall be submitted to and approved by the
City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and
the Orange County Surveyor for technical review
and that all applicable conditions of approval have
been complied with and then shall be filed in the
Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Development
Services
65 That prior to the issuance of the first building
permit, the property owner/developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the property
owner/developer of the Platinum Gateway project,
subject to the approval of the City Engineer, to
provide for cost sharing of the construction of the
public Connector Street between Lewis Street and
Katella Avenue.
Traffic and
Transportation
66 That prior to the approval of the final subdivision
map or issuance of a building permit, whichever
occurs first, the property owner/developer shall
pay the identified fair share responsibility as
determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation
Measures 9-7 and 9-8 of MMP 106C. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow, via an
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City. These improvements consist of any potential
mitigation measures identified in the updated
traffic study.
Traffic and
Transportation
67 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall submit to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division street improvement
Development Services
- 32 - PC2012-***
plans for the work on Katella Avenue, collector
road street “A” and “B” including but not limited to
curb and gutter, sidewalk and landscape, storm
drain, and sewer facilities, and traffic signals as
applicable. The landscape and irrigation
improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance
with the Public Works Landscape and Irrigation
Manual for Public Street and Highway.
68 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall post a security to guarantee the construction
of public improvements, including storm drain,
water, electrical and sewer, in an amount approved
by the City Engineer and in a form approved by
the City Attorney. The improvements shall be
constructed and operational prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
Development
Services
69 The Public Park recreation amenities shall be
designed to the satisfaction of Community
Services Department and in substantial
conformance with Final Site Plan exhibits.
Community Services
ON-GOING DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION
70
(MM 2-1)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring contractors to implement the
following measures to reduce construction-related
emissions; however, the resultant value is
expected to remain significant.
a) The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained in accordance
with the manufacturer’s recommendations
to reduce operational emissions.
b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as
identified by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, off-road
construction equipment with higher air
pollutant emissions standards for
equipment greater than 50 horsepower,
based on manufacturer’s availability.
c) The contractor shall utilize existing power
sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel
generators rather than temporary diesel-
power generators, where feasible.
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
71 The property owner/developer shall implement the South Coast Air
- 33 - PC2012-***
(MM 2-2)
following measures in addition to the existing
requirements for fugitive dust control under South
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403
to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. To
assure compliance, the City shall verify
compliance that these measures have been
implemented during normal construction site
inspections. The measures to be implemented are
listed below:
a) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall re-establish ground cover on the
construction site through seeding and
watering as quickly as possible to achieve
minimum control efficiency for PM10 of 5
percent.
b) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall apply chemical soil stabilizers Pave to
on-site haul roads to achieve control
efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared
to travel on unpaved, untreated roads.
c) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall phase grading
to prevent the susceptibility of large areas
to erosion over extended periods of time.
d) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall schedule
activities to minimize the amount of
exposed excavated soil during and after the
end of work periods.
e) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall sweep streets with Rule
1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum
units on a daily basis if silt is carried over
to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs
as a result of hauling.
f) During active demolition and debris
removal and grading, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall suspend demolition and grading
operations when wind speeds exceed 25
miles per hour to achieve an emissions
control efficiency for PM10 under worst-
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
- 34 - PC2012-***
case wind conditions of 98 percent.
g) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-
inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand,
soil, or other loose materials and tarp
materials with a fabric cover or other
suitable means to achieve a control
efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent. an
h) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall water exposed ground
surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of
every three hours on the construction site
to achieve an emissions reduction control
efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.
i) During active demolition and debris
removal, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall apply water to
disturbed soils at the end of each day to
achieve an emission control efficiency for
PM10 of 10 percent.
j) During scraper unloading and loading, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall ensure that actively
disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil
moisture content of 12 percent by use of a
moveable sprinkler system or water truck
to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of
69 percent.
k) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds
on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles
per hour to achieve a control efficiency for
PM10 of 57 percent.
72
(MM5-7)
Ongoing during grading, demolition, and
construction, the property owner/developer shall
be responsible for requiring contractors to
implement the following measures to limit
construction-related noise:
a) Noise generated by construction, shall be
limited by the property owner/developer to
60 dBA along the property boundaries,
before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as
Building Division
Development
Services
- 35 - PC2012-***
governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure
Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment
that produces noise levels noticeably above
general construction noise levels to the
hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
All internal combustion engines on all of the
construction equipment shall be properly outfitted
with well maintained muffler systems.
73 Through specific study of this project site, by a
certified archaeologist, it has been determined that
no known cultural resources are located in this
area. However, should artifacts be uncovered
during grading or excavation, the developer shall
have a certified archaeologist ensure that the
following actions are implemented:
a) that the project shall be temporarily halted or
work redirected to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of artifacts if
potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If
artifacts are uncovered and determined to be
significant, the archaeological observer shall
determine appropriate actions in cooperation with
the City for exploration and/or salvage;
b) Specimens that are collected prior to or during
the grading process shall be donated to an
appropriate educational or research institution;
c) Any archaeological work at the project site shall
be conducted under the direction of the certified
archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered
during grading operations when the archaeological
observer is not present, grading shall be diverted
around the area until the observer can survey the
area; and
d) A final report detailing the findings and
disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to
the City Engineer. Upon completion of the
grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as
to when the final report will be submitted
Building Division
Development
Services
ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
74 The property owner/developer shall be responsible Building Division
- 36 - PC2012-***
(MM5-8)
for requiring project contractors to properly
maintain and tune all construction equipment to
minimize noise emissions.
75
(MM5-9)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to locate all
stationary noise sources (e.g., generators,
compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied
noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible.
Building Division
76
(MM5-10)
Material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment
servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set
forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code,
Section 6.70.
Building Division
PRIOR TO APPROVAL AND ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION
77
(MM10-2)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass
area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are
making other improvements, the City and/or
property owner/developer shall coordinate with
the OCSD to ensure that all improvements and
construction schedules are coordinated.
Development
Services
78
(MM10-5)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass
area(s) where OCSD will be upsizing trunk lines
and/or are making other improvements, the City
and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD
to ensure that backflow prevention devices are
installed by OCSD at the lateral connections to
prevent surcharge flow from entering private
properties.
Streets and Sanitation
Orange
County Sanitation
District
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
79
(MM 2-5)
In accordance with the timing required by the
Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later
than prior to the first final Building and Zoning
inspection, the property owner/developer shall
implement the following measures to reduce long-
term operational CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10
emissions:
• Traffic lane improvements and
Traffic and
Transportation
- 37 - PC2012-***
signalization as outlined in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft
Traffic Study Report, Parsons
Brinckerhoff, August 2010 and Master Plan
of Arterial Highways (MPAH ) shall be
implemented as required by the Traffic and
Transportation Manager.
The property owner/contractor shall place bus
benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic
and Transportation Manager at locations along any
site frontage routes as needed.
80
(MM 5-3)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during a stadium event will be provided
to all future tenants in the Stadium District.
Building Division
81
(MM 5-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during Stadium nearby venue events.
Building Division
82 A parking management plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the City Engineer prior to
the project receiving a certificate of occupancy.
Planning Division &
Traffic and
Transportation
83 That prior to final building and zoning inspection,
fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any
Time.” Said information shall be specifically
shown on plans submitted for building permits.
Traffic and
Transportation
84 In the event that the adjacent Platinum Gateway
project has not completed the following
improvement, the property owner/developer shall
construct the Connector Street as identified on the
Site Plan along the west property line prior to final
building and zoning inspections. These
improvements shall include a cul-de-sac at the
north end of the Connector Street, or other turn
around area to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, if it is expected that this project will be
in operation prior to the Platinum Gateway
project.
Traffic and
Transportation
- 38 - PC2012-***
85 That prior to City acceptance of the public right-
of-way improvements for Katella Avenue and for
the public Connector Street identified in the Final
Site Plan, said streets shall be posted with “No
Stopping Any Time” signs and associated red
curbs, except, in the locations where the
Connector Street is improved with designated
parking stalls and designated turn-out areas for
loading and unloading. Such signs shall be shown
on street improvement plans submitted by the
property owner/developer for the review and
approval by the Public Works Department. The
location of such signs shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Traffic Engineering
Manager. The property owner/developer shall be
responsible for all costs associated with the
installation of such signs.
Traffic and
Transportation
86 That prior to final building and zoning inspections,
the developer shall install accessible curb access
ramps with truncated domes at the intersection of
collector street “A” at the parking garage access,
in conformance with Public Works Standard
Detail 111-3.
Development
Services
87 Prior to release of posted securities, the public
improvements shall be constructed by the
developer and accepted by Construction Services
prior to final zoning and building inspections.
Development
Services
88 If required, prior to connection of electrical
service, the legal owner shall provide to the City
of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with
dimensions as shown on the approved utility
service plan.
Electrical
Engineering
89 That prior to final building and zoning inspections,
the developer shall improve the streets as follows:
1) improve Katella Avenue per the Platinum
Triangle Implementation Master Plan or as
approved by the City Engineer, 2) improve the
interior collector streets “A” per the Connector and
Collector Streets requirements of the Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan and the Platinum
Triangle Implementation Plan. Install a temporary
turn-around at the north terminus of Street “A” as
Development
Services
- 39 - PC2012-***
required by the City Engineer and the Fire
Department.
90 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal
owner shall submit payment to the City of
Anaheim for service connection fees.
Electrical
Engineering
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL
91 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for
Platinum Gateway and/or Platinum Vista, any
existing structures located within the ultimate
right-of-way for connector streets “A” and “B”,
Katella Avenue and Lewis Street shall be
demolished.
Development
Services
92 The vehicular access rights to Katella Avenue shall
be released and relinquished to the City of
Anaheim.
Development
Services
93 The vehicular access rights to connector public road
STREET “A” and STREET “B”, except at the
private street openings, shall be released and
relinquished to the City of Anaheim.
Development
Services
94 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably
offer for dedication (with subordination of
easements), including necessary construction
easements, 1) the ultimate arterial highway
right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property (Katella
Avenue) as shown in the Platinum Triangle
Implementation Plan or as approved by the City
Engineer, and 2) the ultimate right-of-way for the
interior collector streets “A” and “B” per the
Connector and Collector Streets requirements of
the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan,
regardless of the level of impacts generated by the
project.
Development
Services
95 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map,
in the event that the owner of Parcel 1 of Tentative
Tract 17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Gateway" project (APN 082-26-123
and 082-26-124), requires to construct Collector
Street “A” and/or “B” improvements, the property
owner/developer shall cooperate with “Platinum
Gateway” to grant temporary construction
easement(s) where necessary adjacent to Collector
Street “A” and/or “B” lying within the boundary
Development
Services
- 40 - PC2012-***
of Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract 17494.
96 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map,
in the event that the Parcel 1 of Tentative Tract
17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Gateway" project (APN 082-26-123
and 082-26-124), is not developed, the owner of
Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract 17494 shall install a
vehicular turn-around area lying within the
boundary of Parcel 1 and Lot “A” of Tentative
Tract 17494. The geometry of the temporary turn-
around shall be reviewed and approved by City
Engineer and the Fire Department.
Development
Services
97 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the
Subdivision Section and approved by the City
Attorney's office. The covenant shall include
provisions for maintenance of private facilities such
as private sewer, concrete paver covered street
sections, private storm drain improvements,
temporary turn-around areas, if any, and backflow
prevention devices such as flap gates; compliance
with approved Water Quality Management Plan;
and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance
responsibilities shall include all drainage devices,
concrete pavers within the Connector public road,
sewer system, gates, parkway landscaping and
irrigation on Katella Avenue, collector public road
STREET “A” and STREET “B”, all lettered lots,
and any private street name signs. The covenant
shall be recorded concurrently with the final map.
Development
Services
98 The legal property owner shall execute a
Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the
City Attorney, to complete the required public
improvements at the legal property owner’s
expense. Said agreement shall be submitted to the
Public Works Department, Subdivision Section
approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer.
In lieu of a Subdivision Agreement, an amended
Development Agreement can be utilized to satisfy
this condition of approval if the required terms are
included therein.
Development
Services
99 The property owner/developer shall record an
easement for cul-de-sac driveway purposes on the
adjacent property to the immediate west if needed,
as approved by the City Engineer.
Traffic Engineering
- 41 - PC2012-***
GENERAL
100
(MM7-6)
Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim
Police Department of Anaheim Traffic
Management Center (TMC) personnel are required
to provide temporary traffic control services for
the project, the property owner/developer shall
reimburse the City, on a fair share basis, if
applicable, for reasonable costs associated with
such services
Police
Traffic Management
Development
Services
101
(MM10-19)
Ongoing during project operations, the following
practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the
property owner/developer:
• Usage of recycled paper products for
stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
• Recovery of materials, such as aluminum
and cardboard.
• Collection of office paper for recycling.
Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser
printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap
metal for recycling or recovery.
Streets and Sanitation
102 Ongoing during business operations and in
accordance with the Development Requirements
and Maintenance Obligations, OWNER shall be
responsible for restoring any special surface
improvements other than asphalt paving within the
right-of-way, City water easements, Public Utility
easements, private roads, alleys and driveways,
including but not limited to colored concrete,
stamped concrete, bricks, pavers, concrete, walls,
or landscaping that becomes damaged during any
excavation, repair or replacement of any City
water facility. Provisions for maintenance of all
said special surface improvements shall be
included in the recorded Master C, C & R’s for the
project.
Water Engineering
103
The Planning Director has the authority to grant
the modification of the timing of any of the
conditions of approval, provided said modification
does not result in any increase in environmental
impacts for which sufficient mitigation cannot be
provided. Any request for such modification shall
be in writing and shall clearly identify the reason
Planning Division
- 42 - PC2012-***
for the modification. Appeal of such decision
shall be provided pursuant to Section 18.60.135
(Appeals – Planning Director Decisions) of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
104 The subject property shall be developed
substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by
the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1
(Overall Site Plan including Platinum
Vista and Platinum Gateway) Exhibit No. 2
(Platinum Vista Site Plan), Exhibit No. 3
(Tentative Tract Map), Exhibit No. 4, Floor and
Unit Plans), Exhibit No. 5 (Garage Plans), Exhibit
No. 6 (Elevations), Exhibit No. 7 (Site Section),
Exhibit No. 8 (Landscape Plans and Materials
Legend), and as conditioned herein.
Planning Division
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 6
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THAT THE PREVIOUSLY-
CERTIFIED ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339,
TOGETHER WITH THE UPDATED AND MODIFIED MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 106C FOR THE PLATINUM
TRIANGLE, MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN NO. 307, AND
ADDENDUMS NOS. 1 AND 2 TO ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT NO. 339, SERVE AS THE APPROPRIATE
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR THE PLATINUM
GATEWAY PROJECT AND REQUIRED AND RELATED
DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS, AND RECOMMENDING CITY
COUNCIL APPROVAL OF THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002 (DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002D) BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
(DEV2012-00059)
WHEREAS, pursuant to the adoption of Ordinance No. 6106 by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim ("City Council") on June 24, 2008, the City of Anaheim, on the one hand, and
K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC (collectively referred to
herein as "K/L"), on the other hand, entered into that certain Development Agreement No. 2008-
00002, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange, California
("Official Records") on June 24, 2008, as Instrument No. 2008000351778 (the “Development
Agreement”) with respect to that certain real property consisting of approximately 7.01 acres and
commonly known as 905 through 917 East Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange, State of California, which real property is generally depicted on the map attached hereto
as Exhibit A and more particularly described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated
herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Development Agreement provided for development of a master planned
mixed-use project on the Property comprised of, among other uses, a 320-unit residential
condominium project, a 209,419 square foot twelve-story office building, including a 5,586
square foot full-service restaurant, 4,381 square feet of retail space, and a 104,604 square foot
138-room hotel. In addition to the Development Agreement, the City Council approved
Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05304 to permit the modification of setback requirements and
building height for the hotel (the "Original Project"); and
WHEREAS, on June 10, 2008 and prior to its adoption of Ordinance No. 6106 and the
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-05304, the City Council found and determined that
FSEIR No. 334, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106B for the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 153, served as the
appropriate environmental documentation for the Original Project; and
- 2 - PC2012-***
WHEREAS, Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership ("Shopoff"), has
entered into an agreement with K/L to purchase the Property. Under the authority set forth in
Section 65865 of the California Government Code, Shopoff possesses an equitable interest in
and to the Property and is, therefore, authorized to enter into a Development Agreement with the
City for the Property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority conferred upon Shopoff by K/L and in accordance
with Section 21 of the Development Agreement and Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code (the "Code"), Shopoff submitted to the City a request to modify the site design and product
type of the Original Project, consisting of an increase in the number of dwelling units from 320
to 399 residential apartment units, a reduction in the amount of office and commercial
development, the addition of a public park (the "Platinum Gateway Project"). To that end,
Shopoff has requested the following entitlements:
(a) that the Development Agreement be amended and restated in the form of the
proposed First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2008-00002
(Development Agreement No. 2008-00002D) (the "Amended and Restated
Development Agreement") presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was
adopted;
(b) that the General Plan be amended to modify "Table LU-4: General Plan
Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City" to increase the number of
dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development
allowed within the Mixed-Use land use designation of the Platinum Triangle Area
and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a
public park ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486");
(c) that the Zoning Code be amended to make the Zoning Code consistent with
General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486, as adopted ("Zoning Code
Amendment No. 2012-00107");
(d) that (i) Chapter 1, Table 1-General Plan Development Intensities, (ii) Chapter
1, Figure 3 (General Plan Designations), (iii) Chapter 2, Figure 4 (Platinum
Triangle Urban Design Plan), (iv) Chapter 3, Figure 5 (Mixed Use and Office
Districts), and (v) Chapter 4, Figure 20 (Landscape Concept Plan) of the Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan be amended ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-
00559"); and
(e) that Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 be approved.
WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated Development Agreement, General Plan
Amendment No. 2012-00486, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107, Miscellaneous Case
No. 2012-00559 and Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 shall be referred to herein collectively as
the "Entitlements"; and
- 3 - PC2012-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has heretofore approved Final Site Plan No. 2012-
00008 ("Final Site Plan") to provide for the development of the Platinum Gateway Project,
contingent upon the approval of the proposed Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
conducted a public hearing for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements at
the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on December 3, 2012, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public
hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of
Chapter 18.60 of the Code, and considered information presented by City staff and evidence for
and against the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines provides a way for the City to
update, amplify and make changes or additions to a previously adopted environmental impact
report in situations where a subsequent environmental impact report is not required. According
to Section 15164, the City must prepare an "addendum" to a previously certified environmental
impact report "if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 [of the State CEQA Guidelines] calling for the preparation of a subsequent
[environmental impact report] have occurred"; and
WHEREAS, as a result of the proposed entitlements requested by Shopoff for the
Platinum Gateway Project and the Platinum Gateway Project, itself, the City has prepared an
Addendum to FSEIR No. 339 ("Addendum No. 2") in the form presented to the Planning
Commission at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted because it appears that “none of
the conditions described in Section 15162 [of the State CEQA Guidelines] calling for the
preparation of a subsequent [environmental impact report] have occurred”; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission has reviewed and considered the information
contained in Addendum No. 2 and all accompanying documents, and concludes that in its
independent judgment the Platinum Gateway Project will not result in any significant
environmental impacts that have not already been addressed in FSEIR No. 339 (including
Addendum No. 1 and Addendum No. 2); and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that (i) FSEIR No. 339,
together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 307 and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2, serve as the
appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and the
Entitlements and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent
environmental impact report have occurred in connection with the proposed Platinum Gateway
Project and/or the Entitlements; and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be
prepared under CEQA for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and/or the Entitlements and
all other actions authorized by this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the
testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine that the
proposed Amended and Restated Development in the form presented at this meeting meets all of
- 4 - PC2012-***
the requirements set forth in Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”), which was
adopted by the City Council on November 23, 1982; that is:
1. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is consistent with
the City’s General Plan in that it is in conformance with the General Plan Mixed Use land use
designation for the Property and with the goals, policies, programs and objectives specified in the
General Plan.
2. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is compatible with
the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district in which
the Project is and will be located, and is consistent with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use
Overlay requirements.
3. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is compatible with
the orderly development of property in the surrounding area in that it is in conformance with and
implements the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone requirements.
4. The proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement is not otherwise
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
5. The approval of the proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement
constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power and authority under the
Procedures Resolution.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, this Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council take
the following action:
1. Find and determine that (i) FSEIR No. 339, together with Mitigation Monitoring
Program No. 307 and Addenda Nos. 1 and 2, serve as the appropriate environmental
documentation for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements and satisfy all of
the requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State
CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report have
occurred in connection with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and/or the Entitlements; and
(iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the proposed
Platinum Gateway Project and/or the Entitlements and all other actions authorized by this
Resolution; and
2. Approve and adopt the proposed Amended and Restated Development Agreement
in the form presented at this meeting.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each
and all of the conditions set forth in the proposed Amended and Restated Development
Agreement, which are also set forth in Exhibit C attached hereto. Should said conditions, or any
part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by a final judgment of any court of competent
- 5 - PC2012-***
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the proposed Amended and Restated Development
Agreement be approved contingent upon and subject to approval of the other Entitlements,
specifically, Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559, General Plan Amendment No. 2012- 00486,
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107, and Tentative Tract Map No. 17494.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 3, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
“Zoning Provisions - General” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City
Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 6 - PC2012-***
- 7 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT "B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A-1: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SAID GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING ABOVE 500 FEET, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1973 IN BOOK 10921, PAGE 428 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL A-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL B-1: PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE
SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY GRANTED HEREIN OR ANY PART THEREOF LYING BETWEEN SAID SURFACE AND FIVE
HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW SAID SURFACE, AS SET FORTH IN DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1977 IN BOOK 12506, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL B-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED
DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
[Assessor's Parcels No. 082-261-23 and 082-261-24]
- 8 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “C”
THE FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
NO. 2008-00002
PLATINUM GATEWAY APARTMENTS
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002D)
(DEV2012-00059)
NOTE: Mitigation Measures (“MM”), from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 307 are
incorporated into these conditions of approval and are identified by the mitigation
measure number below applicable condition numbers.
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED
OFF BY
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT OR DEMOLITION PERMITS
1
(MM2-3)
Prior to approval of each grading plan (for
Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit Demolition
and Import/Export Plans detailing construction
and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste
reduction measures to be implemented to recover
C&D materials. These plans shall include
identification of off-site locations for materials
export from the project and options for disposal of
excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent
site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a
project in the vicinity or transport to an
environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts
made to move it within Orange County. The
property owner/developer shall offer recyclable
building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for
sale or removal by private firms or public agencies
for use in construction of other projects if not all
can be reused at the project site.
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
2
(MM 3-2)
At least 90 days prior to the initiation of grading
activities, for projects greater than one acre,
coverage for the project must be obtained by
electronically submitting permit registration
documents to the State or obtaining coverage via
current general construction permit prescribed
method by the property owner/developer pursuant
to State and Federal National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As
Building Division
- 9 - PC2012-***
part of the NOI, a Surface Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The
property owner/developer shall also prepare and
submit to the Development Services Division of
the Public Works Department, a Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with
the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and
Chapter 7 of the Orange County Drainage Area
Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved
prior to issuance of grading permit. The SWPPP,
in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the
structural and nonstructural BMPs that will be
implemented during construction (short-term)
within the Project Area as well as BMPs for long-
term operation of the Project Area that address
potential impacts to surface waters.
3
(MM10-1)
The City Engineer shall review the location of
each project to determine if it is located within an
area served by deficient sewer facilities, as
identified in the latest updated sewer study for the
Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase
sewer flows beyond those programmed in the
appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or
if the project currently discharges to an existing
deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency
in an existing sewer line, the property
owner/developer shall be required to guarantee
mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the
area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
City Attorney’s Office. Prior to issuance of a
grading permit the sewer plans shall be submitted
for review. Prior to issuance of a building permit
for each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer
study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the project area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
thereof.
Development
Services
4 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or Development
- 10 - PC2012-***
(MM10-3)
issuance of a grading or building permit for each
development project, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall contact Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding
sewer capacity. Additionally, if requested by the
OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place
up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a
month to verify capacity and ensure consistency
with the OCSD’s modeling results.
Services
5
(MM10-6)
Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional
analysis shall be performed using flow, wet-
weather data, and other information specific for that
project in order to obtain more accurate results of
the surcharge levels for final design.
Development
Services
6
(MM10-8)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit,
the property owner/developer shall provide
engineering studies, including network analysis, to
size the water mains for ultimate development
within the project. This includes detailed water
usage analysis and building plans for Public
Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval
in determining project water requirements and
appropriate water assessment fees.
Water Engineering
Division
7
(MM10-9)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation meter when the
total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet.
(City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
Water Engineering
8 The property owner shall comply with Rule 15D
of the Water Utilities Rates, Rules, and
Regulations and pay all applicable water
assessment fees.
Water Engineering
9
(MM10-13)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans water
efficient design features including, but not limited
to (as applicable to the type of development at
issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals,
automatic on and off water faucets, and water
efficient appliances.
Resource Efficiency
- 11 - PC2012-***
10
(MM10-14)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation lines and use
recycled water when it becomes available. All
irrigation systems shall be designed so that they
will function properly with recycled water. The
property owner/developer shall contact the Public
Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division,
for recycled water system requirements and
specific water conservation measures to be
incorporated into the building and landscape
construction plans.
Water Engineering
11
(MM10-17)
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall
review the location of each project to determine if
it is located within an area served by deficient
drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan
of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove
Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the
project will increase stormwater flows beyond
those programmed in the appropriate master plan
drainage study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient storm
drain system or will create a deficiency in an
existing storm drain, the property owner/developer
shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the
impact to adequately serve the area to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer
shall be required to install the drainage facilities,
as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the
impacts of the proposed development based upon
the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones
of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East
Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary
Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of
public improvements by the City or final Building
and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure,
whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property
owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
Development
Services
- 12 - PC2012-***
thereof.
12
(MM 10-20)
Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for
import/export plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for demolition plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit a
Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if
determined to be necessary by the Public Works
Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or
Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall
include identification of off-site locations for
material export from the project and options for
disposal of excess material. These options may
include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a
broker or contractor, sale to a project in the
vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared
landfill, with attempts made to move it within
Orange County. The property owner/developer
shall offer recyclable building materials, such as
asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private
firms or public agencies for use in construction of
other projects, if all cannot be reused on the
project site.
Streets and Sanitation
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
13
(MM10-23)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Relocate Southern California Edison
transmission line underground on
Katella Avenue from west of the Union
Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850
feet).
• Relocate Southern California Edison
communication line underground on
Electrical
Engineering
- 13 - PC2012-***
Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to
east of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet
west of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• Relocate distribution circuits
underground on Katella Avenue from
Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State
College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim
Way to State College Boulevard (1,500
feet).
• Relocation a distribution circuit
underground on Orangewood Avenue
from State College Boulevard to west of
the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Lewis
Street from Katella Avenue to Gene
Autry Way (950 feet).
• Relocate a distribution circuit
underground on Douglas Street from
Katella Avenue to Cerritos Avenue
(1,000 feet).
14
(MM10-25)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Electrical
Engineering
- 14 - PC2012-***
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Two new distribution duct banks on
Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to
Lewis Street (800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell
Avenue (2,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on State
College Boulevard from Cerritos
Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the
Santa Ana River (4,800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from Haster Street to the
east side of I-5 (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,400 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Lewis
Street and Santa Cruz Street from
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on the east
side of the Angel Stadium parking lot
from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57
(2,000 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road
from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue (4,000 feet).
15 Prior to issuance of the grading permit and right-of-
way construction permit for the storm drain and
sewer, whichever occurs first, a Save Harmless
agreement in-lieu of an Encroachment Agreement is
required to be executed, approved by the City and
recorded by the applicant on the property for any
storm drains connecting to a City storm drain.
Development
Services
- 15 - PC2012-***
16 The property owner shall submit a final drainage
report and project improvement plans that
incorporate the required drainage improvements and
the mechanisms proposed in the Drainage Report.
No offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after
grading operations or perimeter wall construction.
Development
Services
17 The property owner/developer shall submit plans
documenting that the design of all aboveground
structures (with the exception of parking
structures) shall be at least one foot higher that the
100-year flood zone, where applicable, unless
otherwise required by the City Engineer. All
structures below this level shall be floodproofed to
prevent damage to property or harm to people.
Development
Services
18 The OWNER shall demonstrate that coverage has
been obtained under California’s General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with
Construction Activity by providing a copy of the
Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water
Resources Control Board and a copy of the
subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste
Discharge Identification (WDID) number. The
owner shall prepare and implement a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the
current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and
be available for City review on request.
Development
Services
19 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each
development project, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install the sanitary
sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer,
to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer
study for the Platinum Triangle.
Development
Services
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
20
(MM2-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence that high-solids or water-based low
emissions paints and coatings are utilized in the
design and construction of buildings, in
compliance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s regulations. This
information shall be denoted on the project plans
and specifications. Additionally, the property
owner/developer’s shall specify the use of high-
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
- 16 - PC2012-***
volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand
application. Air-atomized spray techniques shall
not be permitted. Plans shall also show that
property owner/developers shall construct/build
with materials that do not require painting, or use
prepainted construction materials, to the extent
feasible.
21
(MM2-6)
The property owner/architect shall submit energy
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with
the performance approach to the California Energy
Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that
shows each new structure exceeds the applicable
Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a
minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building
permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as
vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof
temperatures significantly during the
summer and; therefore, reduce the energy
requirement for air conditioning. Examples
of energy efficient building materials and
suppliers can be found at the following
website: http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or
other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-
colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous
pavement, for all roadways and walkways
not within the public right-of-way, to
minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its
surrounding environment. Examples of
cool pavement materials are available at:
http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html
or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the
existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy
efficient appliances (e.g., EnergyStar®
appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering
window coatings or double-paned
windows.
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all
Building Division
- 17 - PC2012-***
commercial structures encompassing over
50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within
close proximity to the building structure to
reduce heat load and resulting energy
usage at residential, commercial, and
office.
22
(MM5-1)
Prior to approval of street improvement plans for
any project-related roadway widening, the City
shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design
project acoustical features that will limit traffic
noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are
below the City’s noise ordinance. These
treatments shall be noted on the street
improvement plans to the satisfaction of the
Planning Department and may include, but are not
limited to, the replacement of windows and doors
at existing residences with acoustically rated
windows and doors.
Development
Services
Building Division
23
(MM10-4)
Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for
each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade
structures of the proposed development based upon
the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum
Triangle. Where requested by the City Engineer,
sewer improvements shall be constructed with
larger than recommended diameter to maintain the
surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert
elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above
the hydraulic grade line elevation of the surcharge
levels when they are above the pipe crown.
Public Works
Department,
Development
Services Division
24
(MM5-2)
The project property owner/developers shall
submit a final acoustical report prepared to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report
shall show that the development will be sound-
attenuated against present and projected noise
levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter,
stationary sources (e.g., industrial, commercial,
stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior
noise standards as follows:
a) The report shall demonstrate that the
proposed residential design will result in
Building Division
- 18 - PC2012-***
compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior
noise levels, as required by the California
Building Code and California Noise
Insulation Standards (Title 24 and 25 of the
California Code of Regulations).
b) The report shall demonstrate that the
Proposed Project residential design shall
minimize nighttime awakening from
stadium event noise and train horns such
that interior single-event noise levels are
below 81 dBA Lmax.
The property owner/developer shall submit the
noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for
review and approval. Upon approval by the City,
the project acoustical design features shall be
incorporated into construction of the Proposed
Project.
25
(MM5-5)
To reduce noise and vibration impacts from the
impact pile driver, the construction contractor
shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast
piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct
cast-in-place piles for a pile-supported transfer
slab foundation system. This alternative
construction method would reduce the duration
necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or
eliminate the need to use pile drivers altogether.
Proof of compliance with this measure shall be
submitted to the Planning Department in the form
of a letter from the construction contractor.
Building Division
26
(MM7-1)
Plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have
fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim
Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed
by the property owner/developer prior to each
final Building and Zoning inspection.
Fire Department
27
(MM7-2)
The property owner/developer shall pay the Public
Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time,
for fire facilities and equipment impact fees
identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter
17.36.
Fire Department
28
(MM7-3)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
to the Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval for the purpose of incorporating safety
measures in the project design including
Police Department
- 19 - PC2012-***
implementation of Ordinance 6016 and the concept
of crime prevention through environmental design
(i.e., building design, circulation, site planning and
lighting of parking structure and parking areas).
Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking
structures (for the police helicopter). Minimum
size for numbers shall be four feet in height and
two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall
be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches
apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to
the parking structure and shall face the street to
which the structure is addressed.
29
(MM7-4)
For a parking structure, the property
owner/developer shall submit plans to the
Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval indicating the provision of closed circuit
monitoring and recording or other substitute
security measures as may be approved by the
Anaheim Police Department. Said measures shall
be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning
inspections.
Police Department
30
(MM7-5)
The property owner/developer shall submit design
plans that shall include parking lots and parking
structures with controlled access points to limit
ingress and egress if determined to be necessary
by the Anaheim Police Department, and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim
Police Department.
Police Department
31
(MM7-9)
The property owner/developer shall pay the school
impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of
the Anaheim Union High School District and
Anaheim City School District in compliance with
Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section
65995 [b][3] as amended).
Community
Development
Building Division
32
(MM9-4)
The property owner/developer shall pay the
appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees,
Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
Traffic and
Transportation
- 20 - PC2012-***
which have been established.
33
(MM9-5)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan.
Traffic and
Transportation
34
(MM 9-6)
Any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak
hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic
Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property
owner/developers shall prepare traffic
improvement phasing analyses to identify when
the improvements identified in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic
Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010
(Appendix F of this SEIR) shall be designed and
constructed. The Development Agreement
Conditions of Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to implement traffic
improvements as identified in the project traffic
study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as
defined by the City’s General Plan, based on
thresholds of significance, performance standards
and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339,
Orange County Congestion Management Program
and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study
Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses
will specify the timing, funding, construction and
fair share responsibilities for all traffic
improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory
levels of service within the City of Anaheim and
surrounding jurisdictions. The Development
Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require
the property owner/developer to construct, bond
for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary
circulation system improvements, as determined
by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager,
unless alternative funding sources have been
identified.
Traffic and
Transportation
35 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
- 21 - PC2012-***
(MM9-7)
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners
/developers will analyze to determine when the
intersection improvements shall be constructed,
subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation
Measure 9-6 of Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
106C.
The improvement phasing analyses will specify
the timing, funding, construction and fair-share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements
necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service
within the City of Anaheim and surrounding
jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-share calculations
shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-
way, and construction costs, unless alternative
funding sources have been identified to help pay
for the improvement.
The Development Agreement Conditions of
Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter
into a funding agreement for necessary circulation
system improvements, as determined by the City
Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless
alternative funding sources have been identified.
Traffic and
Transportation
36
(MM9-8)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions
shall be taken in cooperation with the City of
Orange:
a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis
shall identify any impacts created by the
project on facilities within the City of
Orange. The fair-share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
shall be calculated in this analysis.
b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the
cost of the project’s fair-share
responsibility in cooperation with the City
of Orange.
c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of
Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City of
Anaheim shall hold the amount received in
Traffic and
Transportation
- 22 - PC2012-***
trust, and then, once a mutually agreed
upon joint program is executed by both
cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate
the fair-share contribution to traffic
mitigation programs that result in improved
traffic flow at the impacted locations, via
an agreement mutually acceptable to both
cities.
d) The City shall work with the City of
Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure the
fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial
and intersection impacts in the City of
Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible.
37
(MM9-9)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a
regional transportation agency has not already
programmed and funded the warranted
improvements to the impacted freeway mainline
or freeway ramp locations, property
owners/developers and the City will take the
following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s
proportionate impact on the specific
freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp
locations and its fair share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
based on thresholds of significance,
performance standards and methodologies
utilized in SEIR No. 339 and established in
the Orange County Congestion
Management Program and City of
Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines.
b) The City shall estimate the cost of the
project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
Traffic and
Transportation
38
(MM9-10)
Prior to the approval of a building permit the
property owner/developer shall pay the identified
fair-share responsibility as determined by the City
as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow on the
impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an
Traffic and
Transportation
- 23 - PC2012-***
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City.
39
(MM9-11)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of
impacts generated by the project.
Traffic and
Transportation
40
(MM9-14)
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for
each building, the property owner/developer shall
pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment
Fees, Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
Traffic and
Transportation
41
(MM9-15)
The property owner/developer shall meet with the
Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine
whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed
adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is
required, it shall be placed in a location that least
impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the
Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the
approval of the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA).
Traffic and
Transportation
Orange County
Transportation
Authority (OCTA)
42
(MM10-7)
Landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance
with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape
Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in
compliance with the State of California Model
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the
project are the following:
• Use of water-conserving landscape plant
materials wherever feasible;
Resource Efficiency
Development
Services
- 24 - PC2012-***
• Use of vacuums and other equipment to
reduce the use of water for wash down of
exterior areas;
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment
including low flush toilets and urinals;
• Use of self-closing valves for drinking
fountains;
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as
drip irrigation and automatic systems
which use moisture sensors;
• Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and
urinals;
• Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at
night, when evaporation rates are lowest;
• Water-efficient dishwashers, clothes
washers, and other water using
appliances;
• Cooling tower recirculating system;
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in
irrigation system;
• Use of waterway recirculation systems;
• Provide information to the public in
conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
• Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and
washdown when it becomes available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and
building plans, the applicant shall identify which
of these measures have been incorporated into the
plans.
43
(MM 10-12)
Submitted landscape plans for all residential,
office and commercial landscaping shall
demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant
materials pursuant to the publication entitled
“Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by
the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000.
Resource Efficiency
44
(MM10-18)
The property owner/developer shall submit project
plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the
Public Works Department for review and approval
to ensure that the plans comply with AB939, and
the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the
Streets and Sanitation
- 25 - PC2012-***
County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated
Waste Management Plans as administered by the
City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan
shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain
in full effect as required by the Street and
Sanitation Division and may include, at its
discretion, the following plan components:
• Detailing the locations and design of on-
site recycling facilities.
• Participating in the City of Anaheim’s
“Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by
the City or governing agency.
• Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially
in retail areas) by providing adequate space
and centralized locations for collection and
bailing.
• Providing trash compactors for non-
recyclable materials whenever feasible to
reduce the total volume of solid waste and
number of trips required for collection.
• Providing on-site recycling receptacles
accessible to the public to encourage
recycling for all businesses, employees,
and patrons where feasible.
• Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies
with federal, state, and city regulations.
45
(MM 10-21)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
showing that each structure will exceed the State
Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential
Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California
Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent
and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public
Utilities Department Business and Community
Programs Division. This consultation shall take
place during project design in order to review Title
24 measures that are incorporated into the project
design energy efficient practices and allow
potential system alternatives such as thermal
energy storage air-conditioning, lighting, and
building envelope options. Plans submitted for
building permits shall show the proposed energy
efficiencies and systems alternatives.
Business and
Community
Programs
- 26 - PC2012-***
46
(MM 10-22)
The property owner/developer shall indicate on
plans energy-saving practices that will be
implemented with the project in compliance with
Title 24, which may include the following:
• High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS
(computer) control.
• Variable Air Volume (VAV) air
distribution.
• Outside air (100 percent) economizer
cycle.
• Staged compressors or variable speed
drives to flow varying thermal loads.
• Isolated HVAC zone control by
floors/separable activity areas.
• Specification of premium-efficiency
electric motors (i.e., compressor motors,
air-handling units, and fan-coil units).
• Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate
spaces.
• Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
• Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
• Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit
signage.
• Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts
where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
• Use of lighting power controllers in
association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity
discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots.
• Consideration of thermal energy storage air
conditioning for spaces or facilities that
may require air-conditioning during
summer, day-peak periods.
• Consideration for participation in
Advantage Services Programs such as:
o New construction design review, in
which the City cost-shares
engineering for up to $15,000 for
design of energy efficient buildings
and systems.
o New Construction – Cash
Business and
Community
Programs
- 27 - PC2012-***
incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per
kWh saved for each measure and up
to $200,000 per facility for efficiency
that exceed Title 24 requirements.
o Green Building Program – Offers
accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees
and free technical assistance.
• Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons
per flush [gpf] or less).
• Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0
gpf to 0.25 gpf).
• Use of weather-based irrigation controllers
for outdoor irrigation.
Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in
outdoor landscaping.
47
(MM 10-24)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
for review and approval which shall ensure that
buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency
Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24,
Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code)
by a minimum of 10 percent.
Business and
Community
Programs
48
(MM10-26)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, the property owner/developer shall
provide an electrical load analysis to the City of
Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD).
The analysis shall include a load schedule and
maximum electrical coincident demand. Should
the property owner/developer’s load analysis
result in a contributed load forecasted to exceed 20
MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the
electrical system currently serving the Platinum
Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction
of a new electrical substation within the Platinum
Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees for the electrical substation
will be assessed in accordance with the Electric
Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial
mechanism approved by the City design features.
Electrical
Engineering
49 Prior to approval of permits for improvement
plans, the property owner/developer shall
coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish
electrical service requirements and submit electric
Electrical
Engineering
- 28 - PC2012-***
system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans,
elevation plans, and related technical drawings and
specifications.
50
The proposed project shall comply with all State
Energy Insulation Standards and City of Anaheim
codes in effect at the time of application for
building permits. (Commonly referred to as Title
24, these standards are updated periodically to
allow consideration and possible incorporation of
new energy efficiency technologies and methods.)
Electrical
Engineering
51 Prior to approval of permits for improvement
plans, the property owner/developer shall
coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish
electrical service requirements and submit electric
system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans,
elevation plans, and related technical drawings and
specifications.
Electrical
Engineering
52 That a private water system with separate water
service for fire protection and domestic water shall
be provided inside the development.
Water Engineering
53 That all backflow equipment shall be located
above ground outside of the street setback area in
a manner fully screened from all public streets and
alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently
installed in a vault will have to be brought up to
current standards. Any other large water system
equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of
the Water Engineering Division outside of the
street setback area in a manner fully screened from
all public streets and alleys. Said information shall
be specifically shown on plans and approved by
Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control
Inspector.
Water Engineering
54 That all requests for new water services or fire
lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or
abandonments of existing water services and fire
lines, shall be coordinated through Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Water Engineering
55 That this is a non-individual homeowner project
with a landscaping area (including pools or other
Water features) exceeding 2,500 square feet, a
Water Engineering
- 29 - PC2012-***
Landscape Documentation Package and a
Certification of Completion are required and a
separate irrigation meter shall be installed in
compliance with Chapter 10.19 of Anaheim
municipal Code and Ordinance No. regarding
water conservation.
56 That landscaping shall be provided around the
above ground large meter or fire service to shield
from street view.
Water Engineering
57 That all existing water services and fire services
shall conform to current Water Services Standards
Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line
that does not meet current standards shall be
upgraded if continued use is necessary or
abandoned if the existing service is no longer
needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible
for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water
service or fire line.
Water Engineering
58 Prior to Approval of Water Improvement Plan the
Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the
City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large
domestic above-ground water meters and fire
hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement
around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad (ii)
a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water
service mains and service laterals all to the
satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division.
The easements shall be granted on the Water
Engineering Division of the Public Utilities
Department’s standard water easement deed. The
easement deeds shall include language that
requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring
any special surface improvements, other than
asphalt paving, including but not limited to
colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete,
decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that
becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or
replacement of City owned water facilities.
Provisions for the repair, replacement and
maintenance of all surface improvements other
than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of
the Owner and included and recorded in the
Master CC & Rs for the project.
Water Engineering
59 Prior to First Submittal of Water Improvement Water Engineering
- 30 - PC2012-***
Plans the developer/owner shall submit a water
system master plan, including a hydraulic
distribution network analysis, for Public Utilities
Water Engineering review and approval. The
master plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the
proposed on-site water system to meet the
project’s water demands and fire protection
requirements.
60 Prior to Applying for the First Water Meter or Fire
Service or First Submittal of the Water
Improvement Plans the developer/owner shall
submit to the Public Utilities Water Engineering
an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and
maximum day and peak hour water demands for
the project. This information will be used to
determine the adequacy of the existing water
system to provide the estimated water demands.
Any off-site water system improvements required
to serve the project shall be done in accordance
with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates,
Rules, and Regulations.
Water Engineering
61 Prior to Approval of the Water Improvement Plan,
water improvement plans shall be submitted to the
Water Engineering Division for approval and a
performance bond in the amount approved by the
City Engineer and from approved City Attorney
shall be posted with the City of Anaheim.
Water Engineering
62 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any
special surface improvements, other than asphalt
paving, within any right-of-way, public utility
easement or City easement area including but not
limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers,
stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or
landscaping that becomes damaged during any
excavation, repair or replacement of City owned
water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all
said special surface improvements shall be
included in the recorded Master C,C & R’s for the
project and the City easement deeds.
Water Engineering
63 Applicant shall contact Water Engineering for
reclaimed water system requirements and specific
water conservation measures to be incorporated
into the building and landscape construction plans.
Water Engineering
- 31 - PC2012-***
64 A minimum of two connections to public water
mains and water looping inside the project are
required.
Water Engineering
65 The following minimum horizontal clearances
shall be maintained between proposed water main
and other facilities:
• 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-
to-outside wall) from sanitary sewer mains
and laterals
• 5-feet minimum separation from all other
utilities, including storm drains, gas, and
electric
• 3 or 6-feet minimum separation from curb
face
Water Engineering
66 No public water main or public water facilities
shall be installed in alleys, paseo areas or private
streets.
Water Engineering
67 No public water mains or laterals shall be installed
under parking stalls or parking lots.
Water Engineering
68 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the
entrances of parking lots/structures and located in
other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’
x 1’ in overall size, with white background and
black 2” lettering.
Police Department
69 All entrances to parking areas should be posted
with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C. to
assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owner’s/manager’s request.
Police Department
70 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be
painted red to prohibit parallel parking in the drive
aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled
on building plans.
Traffic and
Transportation
71 That prior to issuance of building permits, plans
shall specifically indicate that all vehicular ramps
and grades conform to all applicable Engineering
Standards.
Traffic and
Transportation
72 That prior to issuance of the a building permit for
the parking structure, plans shall demonstrate that
Traffic and
Transportation
- 32 - PC2012-***
at-grade ducts and overhead pipes shall not
encroach in the parking space areas or required
vehicle clearance areas.
73 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
final map shall be submitted to and approved by the
City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and
the Orange County Surveyor for technical review
and that all applicable conditions of approval have
been complied with and then shall be filed in the
Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Development
Services
74 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall submit to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division street improvement
plans for the work on Katella Avenue, Lewis Street,
and connector street “A” and “B” including but not
limited to curb and gutter, sidewalk and landscape,
storm drain, and sewer facilities, and traffic signals.
The landscape and irrigation improvement plans
shall be prepared in accordance with the Public
Works Landscape and Irrigation Manual for Public
Street and Highway.
Development
Services
75 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall post a security to guarantee the construction
of public improvements, including storm drain,
water, electrical and sewer, in an amount approved
by the City Engineer and in a form approved by
the City Attorney. The improvements shall be
constructed and operational prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
Development
Services
76 That prior to the issuance of the first building
permit, the property owner/developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the property
owner/developer of the Platinum Vista project,
subject to the approval of the City Engineer, to
provide for cost sharing of the construction of the
public Connector Street between Lewis Street and
Katella Avenue.
Traffic and
Transportation
77 That prior to the approval of the final subdivision
map or issuance of a building permit, whichever
occurs first, the property owner/developer shall
pay the identified fair share responsibility as
determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation
Measures 9-7 and 9-8 of MMP 106C. The City
Traffic and
Transportation
- 33 - PC2012-***
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow, via an
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City. These improvements consist of any potential
mitigation measures identified in the updated
traffic study.
78 The Public Park recreation amenities shall be
designed to the satisfaction of Community
Services Department.
Community Services
79 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
final map shall be submitted to and approved by the
City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and
the Orange County Surveyor for technical review
and that all applicable conditions of approval have
been complied with and then shall be filed in the
Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Development
Services
80 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall post a security to guarantee the construction
of public works improvements in an amount
approved by the City Engineer and in a form
approved by the City Attorney.
Development
Services
ON-GOING DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION
81
(MM 2-1)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring contractors to implement the
following measures to reduce construction-related
emissions; however, the resultant value is
expected to remain significant.
a) The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained in accordance
with the manufacturer’s recommendations
to reduce operational emissions.
b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as
identified by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, off-road
construction equipment with higher air
pollutant emissions standards for
equipment greater than 50 horsepower,
based on manufacturer’s availability.
c) The contractor shall utilize existing power
sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel
generators rather than temporary diesel-
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
- 34 - PC2012-***
power generators, where feasible.
82
(MM 2-2)
The property owner/developer shall implement the
following measures in addition to the existing
requirements for fugitive dust control under South
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403
to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. To
assure compliance, the City shall verify
compliance that these measures have been
implemented during normal construction site
inspections. The measures to be implemented are
listed below:
a) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall re-establish ground cover on the
construction site through seeding and
watering as quickly as possible to achieve
minimum control efficiency for PM10 of 5
percent.
b) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall apply chemical soil stabilizers Pave to
on-site haul roads to achieve control
efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared
to travel on unpaved, untreated roads.
c) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall phase grading
to prevent the susceptibility of large areas
to erosion over extended periods of time.
d) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall schedule
activities to minimize the amount of
exposed excavated soil during and after the
end of work periods.
e) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall sweep streets with Rule
1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum
units on a daily basis if silt is carried over
to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs
as a result of hauling.
f) During active demolition and debris
removal and grading, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall suspend demolition and grading
operations when wind speeds exceed 25
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
- 35 - PC2012-***
miles per hour to achieve an emissions
control efficiency for PM10 under worst-
case wind conditions of 98 percent.
g) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-
inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand,
soil, or other loose materials and tarp
materials with a fabric cover or other
suitable means to achieve a control
efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent. an
h) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall water exposed ground
surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of
every three hours on the construction site
to achieve an emissions reduction control
efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.
i) During active demolition and debris
removal, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall apply water to
disturbed soils at the end of each day to
achieve an emission control efficiency for
PM10 of 10 percent.
j) During scraper unloading and loading, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall ensure that actively
disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil
moisture content of 12 percent by use of a
moveable sprinkler system or water truck
to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of
69 percent.
k) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds
on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles
per hour to achieve a control efficiency for
PM10 of 57 percent.
83
(MM5-7)
Ongoing during grading, demolition, and
construction, the property owner/developer shall
be responsible for requiring contractors to
implement the following measures to limit
construction-related noise:
a) Noise generated by construction, shall be
limited by the property owner/developer to
Building Division
Development
Services
- 36 - PC2012-***
60 dBA along the property boundaries,
before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as
governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure
Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment
that produces noise levels noticeably above
general construction noise levels to the
hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
All internal combustion engines on all of the
construction equipment shall be properly outfitted
with well maintained muffler systems.
84 Through specific study of this project site, by a
certified archaeologist, it has been determined that
no known cultural resources are located in this
area. However, should artifacts be uncovered
during grading or excavation, the developer shall
have a certified archaeologist ensure that the
following actions are implemented:
a) that the project shall be temporarily halted or
work redirected to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of artifacts if
potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If
artifacts are uncovered and determined to be
significant, the archaeological observer shall
determine appropriate actions in cooperation with
the City for exploration and/or salvage;
b) Specimens that are collected prior to or during
the grading process shall be donated to an
appropriate educational or research institution;
c) Any archaeological work at the project site shall
be conducted under the direction of the certified
archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered
during grading operations when the archaeological
observer is not present, grading shall be diverted
around the area until the observer can survey the
area; and
d) A final report detailing the findings and
disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to
the City Engineer. Upon completion of the
grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as
to when the final report will be submitted
Building Division
Development
Services
ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
- 37 - PC2012-***
85
(MM5-8)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to properly
maintain and tune all construction equipment to
minimize noise emissions.
Building Division
86
(MM5-9)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to locate all
stationary noise sources (e.g., generators,
compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied
noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible.
Building Division
87
(MM5-10)
Material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment
servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set
forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code,
Section 6.70.
Building Division
PRIOR TO APPROVAL AND ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION
88
(MM10-2)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass
area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are
making other improvements, the City and/or
property owner/developer shall coordinate with
the OCSD to ensure that all improvements and
construction schedules are coordinated.
Development
Services
89
(MM10-5)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass
area(s) where OCSD will be upsizing trunk lines
and/or are making other improvements, the City
and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD
to ensure that backflow prevention devices are
installed by OCSD at the lateral connections to
prevent surcharge flow from entering private
properties.
Streets and Sanitation
Orange
County Sanitation
District
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
90
(MM 2-5)
In accordance with the timing required by the
Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later
than prior to the first final Building and Zoning
inspection, the property owner/developer shall
implement the following measures to reduce long-
term operational CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10
emissions:
Traffic and
Transportation
- 38 - PC2012-***
• Traffic lane improvements and
signalization as outlined in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft
Traffic Study Report, Parsons
Brinckerhoff, August 2010 and Master Plan
of Arterial Highways (MPAH ) shall be
implemented as required by the Traffic and
Transportation Manager.
The property owner/contractor shall place bus
benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic
and Transportation Manager at locations along any
site frontage routes as needed.
91 A parking management plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the City Engineer prior to
the project receiving a certificate of occupancy.
Planning Division &
Traffic and
Transportation
92 Fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any
Time.” Said information shall be specifically
shown on plans submitted for building permits.
Traffic Engineering
93 That prior to City acceptance of the public right-
of-way improvements for Katella Avenue, Lewis
Street, and for the public Connector Street
identified in the Final Site Plan, said streets shall
be posted with “No Stopping Any Time” signs and
associated red curbs, except, in the locations
where the Connector Street is improved with
designated parking stalls and designated turn-out
areas for loading and unloading. Such signs shall
be shown on street improvement plans submitted
by the property owner/developer for the review
and approval by the Public Works Department.
The location of such signs shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Traffic Engineering
Manager. The property owner/developer shall be
responsible for all costs associated with the
installation of such signs.
Traffic Engineering
94 Prior to release of posted securities, the public
improvements shall be constructed by the
developer and accepted by Construction Services
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Development
Services
95 The developer shall install accessible curb access
ramps with truncated domes at the intersection of
Lewis Street and Connector street “B” and at the
Development
Services
- 39 - PC2012-***
intersection of Connector streets “A” and “B” at
the parking garage access, in conformance with
Public Works Standard Detail 111-3.
96 The developer shall improve the streets as follows:
1) improve Katella Avenue and Lewis Street per the
Platinum Triangle Implementation Master Plan or
as approved by the City Engineer, 2) improve the
interior Connector streets “A” and “B” per the
Connector and Connector Streets requirements of
the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and
the Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan.
Development
Services
97
(MM 5-3)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during a stadium event will be provided
to all future tenants in the Stadium District.
Building Division
98
(MM 5-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during Stadium nearby venue events.
Building Division
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL
99 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for
Platinum Gateway and/or Platinum Vista, any existing
structures located within the ultimate right-of-way for
connector streets “A” and “B”, Katella Avenue and
Lewis Street shall be demolished.
Development
Services
100 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably
offer for dedication (with subordination of
easements), including necessary construction
easements, 1) the ultimate arterial highway
right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property (Katella
Avenue and Lewis Street) as shown in the
Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan or as
approved by the City Engineer, and 2) the ultimate
right-of-way for the interior Connector streets “A”
and “B” per the Connector and Connector Streets
requirements of the Platinum Triangle Master
Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts
generated by the project.
Development
Services
101 In the event that the owner of Parcel 2 of Tentative Development
- 40 - PC2012-***
Tract 17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Vista" project (APN 082-26-127 and
082-26-128), requires to construct Connector
Street “A” and/or “B” improvements, the property
owner/developer shall cooperate with “Platinum
Vista” to offer Connector Street “A” and/or “B”
lying within the boundary of Parcel 1 of Tentative
Tract 17494 as an irrevocable offer of dedication
to the City of Anaheim for public road, public
utilities and other public purposes.
Services
102 In the event that the owner of Parcel 2 of Tentative
Tract 17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Vista" project (APN 082-26-127 and
082-26-128), requires to construct a turn-around
area on the north terminus of Connector Street
“A”, the property owner/developer shall cooperate
with “Platinum Vista” to grant a temporary
easement/right of entry for the portion of the turn-
around lying within the boundary of Parcel 1 and
Lot “A” of Tentative Tract 17494. The geometry
of the temporary turn-around shall be reviewed
and approved by City Engineer and the Fire
Department.
Development
Services
103 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the
Subdivision Section and approved by the City
Attorney's office. The covenant shall include
provisions for maintenance of private facilities such
as private sewer, concrete paver covered street
sections, private storm drain improvements,
temporary turn-around areas, if any, and backflow
prevention devices such as flap gates; compliance
with approved Water Quality Management Plan;
and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance
responsibilities shall include all drainage devices,
concrete pavers within the Connector public road,
sewer system, gates, parkway landscaping and
irrigation on Katella Avenue and Lewis Street,
Connector public road STREET “A” and STREET
“B”, all lettered lots, and any private street name
signs. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently
with the final map.
Development
Services
104 The vehicular access rights to Katella Avenue and
Lewis Street shall be released and relinquished to
the City of Anaheim.
Development
Services
- 41 - PC2012-***
105 The vehicular access rights to connector public road
STREET “A” and STREET “B”, except at the
private street openings, shall be released and
relinquished to the City of Anaheim.
Development
Services
106 The legal property owner shall execute a
Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the
City Attorney, to complete the required public
improvements at the legal property owner’s
expense. Said agreement shall be submitted to the
Public Works Department, Subdivision Section
approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer.
In lieu of a Subdivision Agreement, an amended
Development Agreement can be utilized to satisfy
this condition of approval if the required terms are
included therein.
Development
Services
GENERAL
107
(MM7-6)
Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim
Police Department of Anaheim Traffic
Management Center (TMC) personnel are required
to provide temporary traffic control services for
the project, the property owner/developer shall
reimburse the City, on a fairshare basis, if
applicable, for reasonable costs associated with
such services
Police
Traffic Management
108
(MM10-19)
Ongoing during project operations, the following
practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the
property owner/developer:
• Usage of recycled paper products for
stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
• Recovery of materials, such as aluminum
and cardboard.
• Collection of office paper for recycling.
Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser
printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap
metal for recycling or recovery.
Streets and Sanitation
109 Ongoing during business operations and in
accordance with the Development Requirements
and Maintenance Obligations, OWNER shall be
responsible for restoring any special surface
improvements other than asphalt paving within the
right-of-way, City water easements, Public Utility
Water Engineering
- 42 - PC2012-***
easements, private roads, alleys and driveways,
including but not limited to colored concrete,
stamped concrete, bricks, pavers, concrete, walls,
or landscaping that becomes damaged during any
excavation, repair or replacement of any City
water facility. Provisions for maintenance of all
said special surface improvements shall be
included in the recorded Master CC&R’s for the
project.
110 The Planning Director has the authority to grant
the modification of the timing of any of the
conditions of approval, provided said modification
does not result in any increase in environmental
impacts for which sufficient mitigation cannot be
provided. Any request for such modification shall
be in writing and shall clearly identify the reason
for the modification. Appeal of such decision
shall be provided pursuant to Section 18.60.135
(Appeals – Planning Director Decisions) of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
Planning Division
111 The subject property shall be developed
substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by
the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1
(Overall Site Plan including Platinum Gateway
and Platinum Vista) Exhibit No. 2 (Platinum
Gateway Site Plan), Exhibit No. 3 (Tentative Tract
Map), Exhibit No. 4, Floor and Unit Plans),
Exhibit No. 5 (Garage Plans), Exhibit No. 6
(Elevations), Exhibit No. 7 (Site Section), Exhibit
No. 8 (Landscape Plans and Materials Legend),
and as conditioned herein.
Planning Division
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 7
-1- PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING
COMMISSION APPROVING TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
17494 AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH (SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.).
(DEV2012-00059 & DEV2012-00060)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning
Commission") did receive a verified petition from Shopoff Advisors, L.P. a Delaware limited
partnership ("Shopoff") for approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 to establish a three-lot
subdivision (two numbered lots and one lettered lot) for that certain real property consisting of
approximately 11.14 acres commonly known as 905-1105 East Katella Avenue in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, which real property is depicted on the map
attached hereto as Exhibit A (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, a portion of the Property, consisting of approximately 7.01 acres and
commonly known as 905 through 917 East Katella Avenue (the "K/L Property"), is presently
owned by K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC (collectively
referred to herein as "K/L"). The K/L Property is more particularly described in Exhibit B
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the balance of the Property, consisting of approximately 4.13 acres and
commonly known as 1005 through 1105 East Katella Avenue (the "Marshall/See Property"), is
presently owned by the Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Trust, Dated January 7,
1989, the Marshall Family Trust, Dated February 14, 2000, and See Development Limited
Partnership (collectively referred to herein as "Marshall/See"). The Marshall/See Property is
more particularly described in Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference; and
WHEREAS, Shopoff has entered into an agreement with K/L and Marshall/See to
purchase the Marshall/See Property and the K/L Property. Both K/L and Marshall/See have
authorized Shopoff to submit an application to the City and obtain approval of a tentative tract
map for the Property that would permit the construction of a three hundred ninety-nine (399) unit
residential apartment project on the K/L Property (the "Platinum Gateway Project") and a three
hundred fifty (350) unit residential apartment project on the Marshall/See Property (the
"Platinum Vista Project"); and
WHEREAS, Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 was proposed in conjunction with (a) a
proposed First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2008-00002 (Development
Agreement No. 2008-00002D), General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486, Zoning Code
Amendment No. 2012-00107, and Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559 for the Platinum
Gateway Project (herein referred to herein as the "Platinum Gateway Project Entitlements"), and
(b) a proposed First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2007-00002
-2- PC2012-***
(Development Agreement No. 2007-00002B) for the Platinum Vista Project (herein referred to
as the "Platinum Vista Project Entitlements"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has heretofore approved Final Site Plan No. 2012-
00007 to provide for the development of the Platinum Vista Project and Final Site Plan No.
2012-00008 to provide for the development of the Platinum Gateway Project, contingent upon
the approval of Tentative Tract Map No. 17494; and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, this Planning Commission conducted a public
hearing for proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, along with the Platinum Gateway Project
Entitlements, and the Platinum Vista Project Entitlements, at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council
Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, notice of said public hearing having been duly given
as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code ("Code"), to hear and consider evidence for and against the Platinum Gateway
Project, the Platinum Vista Project, Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, the Platinum Gateway
Project Entitlements, and the Platinum Vista Project Entitlements, and to investigate and make
findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of a separate resolution concurrently with but prior in time
to this Resolution, this Planning Commission has heretofore found and determined and has
recommended that the City Council so find and determine that FSEIR No. 339, together with
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 307, Addendum No. 1, and a subsequent Addendum to
FSEIR No. 339, which has been prepared in connection with the proposed Platinum Gateway
Project ("Addendum No. 2"), serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the
proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, Platinum Gateway Project and the Platinum Gateway
Project Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of a separate resolution concurrently with but prior in time
to this Resolution, this Planning Commission has heretofore found and determined and has
recommended that the City Council so find and determine that FSEIR No. 339, together with
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 306 and Addendum No. 1, serve as the appropriate
environmental documentation for the proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, Platinum Vista
Project and the Platinum Vista Project Entitlements; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of the resolutions referred to in the immediately preceding
two recitals, this Planning Commission has heretofore found and determined and has
recommended that the City Council so find and determine that said environmental
documentation satisfies all of the requirements of CEQA for the proposed Tentative Tract Map
No. 17494, the Platinum Gateway Project, the Platinum Gateway Project Entitlements, the
Platinum Vista Project, and the Platinum Vista Project Entitlements (as the case may be); (ii)
none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the
preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report have occurred in connection with the
proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, the Platinum Gateway Project, the Platinum Gateway
Project Entitlements, the Platinum Vista Project, and the Platinum Vista Project Entitlements;
and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the
proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, the Platinum Gateway Project, the Platinum Gateway
-3- PC2012-***
Project Entitlements, the Platinum Vista Project, and the Platinum Vista Project Entitlements and
all other actions authorized by this Resolution; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the
testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine that proposed
Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, in the form presented at this meeting and a copy of which is
attached to this Resolution as Exhibit A, meets all of the requirements set forth in Resolution No.
82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”), which was adopted by the City Council on November
23, 1982; that is:
1. That the proposed tentative tract map, including its design and improvements, is
consistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan for the Property, as proposed to be modified
by General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486 and Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00553 and is
consistent with the Zoning Code, as proposed to be modified by Zoning Code Amendment No.
2012-00107.
2. That the site is physically suitable for the proposed development at the proposed
density and, therefore, would not cause public health or safety problems or environmental
damage.
3. That the design and improvement of the subdivision is not likely to cause
substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably cause injury to fish or wildlife
or their habitat.
4. That the design and improvement of the proposed subdivision is not likely to
cause serious public health problems.
5. That the design and improvement of the subdivision will not conflict with
easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the
proposed subdivision.
WHEREAS, pursuant to subsection .020 of Section 18.60.150 of the Code, when
multiple discretionary land use applications are submitted for concurrent Planning Commission
review and approval, and one or more of such applications requires City Council review and
approval, all such applications shall be subject to full review and approval by the City Council as
the granting authority.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, this Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council
approve and adopt proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 subject to the conditions of
approval set forth in Exhibits D and E attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in
order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
-4- PC2012-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that proposed Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 be
approved contingent upon and subject to the approval by the City Council of the Platinum
Gateway Entitlements and the Platinum Vista Entitlements, specifically, General Plan
Amendment No. 2012-00486, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107, Miscellaneous Case
No. 2012-00559, First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2007-00002
(Development Agreement No. 2007-00002B), and First Amended and Restated Development
Agreement No. 2008-00002 (Development Agreement No. 2008-00002D), now pending.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each
and all of the conditions set forth in Exhibits D and E attached hereto. Should any of said
conditions, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by a final judgment of any
court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall
be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that timing for compliance with conditions of approval
may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent
timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the
modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code, and (iii) the applicant has
demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges
related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of
the final invoice or prior to the approval of the final map for this project, whichever occurs first.
Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the approval of the final map or the revocation
of the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
December 3, 2012. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Section
17.08.100.030 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-5- PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City
Planning Commission held on December 3, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of December 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
EXHIBIT "B"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF K/L PROPERTY
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A-1: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SAID GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND
ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING ABOVE 500 FEET, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION
COMPANY, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1973 IN BOOK 10921, PAGE 428 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL A-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL B-1: PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE
THEREOF; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY GRANTED HEREIN OR ANY PART THEREOF LYING BETWEEN SAID SURFACE AND FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW
SAID SURFACE, AS SET FORTH IN DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1977 IN BOOK 12506, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE
COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
[Assessor's Parcels Nos. 082-261-23 and 082-261-24]
EXHIBIT "C"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF MARSHALL/SEE PROPERTY
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL NO. 1:
PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42
INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
[Assessor's Parcel No. 082-261-27]
PARCEL NO. 2:
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42
INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
[Assessor's Parcel No. 082-261-28]
EXHIBIT “D”
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17494
RELATED TO PLATINUM GATEWAY PROJECT
(DEV2012-00059)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED
OFF BY
1 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for Platinum Gateway
and/or Platinum Vista, any existing structures located within the
ultimate right-of-way for connector streets “A” and “B”, Katella
Avenue and Lewis Street shall be demolished.
Public Works,
Development
Services
2 The vehicular access rights to Katella Avenue and Lewis Street shall be
released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim. Public Works,
Development
Services
3 The vehicular access rights to collector public road STREET “A” and
STREET “B”, except at the private street openings, shall be released and
relinquished to the City of Anaheim.
Public Works,
Development
Services
4 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication
(with subordination of easements), including necessary construction
easements, 1) the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to
their property (Katella Avenue and Lewis Street) as shown in the
Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan or as approved by the City
Engineer, and 2) the ultimate right-of-way for the interior collector
streets “A” and “B” per the Connector and Collector Streets requirements
of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level
of impacts generated by the project.
Public Works,
Development
Services
5 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map, in the event that the
owner of Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract 17494, commonly known as the
proposed "Platinum Vista" project (APN 082-26-127 and 082-26-128),
requires to construct Collector Street “A” and/or “B” improvements, the
property owner/developer shall cooperate with “Platinum Vista” to offer
Collector Street “A” and/or “B” lying within the boundary of Parcel 1 of
Tentative Tract 17494 as an irrevocable offer of dedication to the City
of Anaheim for public road, public utilities and other public purposes.
Public Works,
Development
Services
6 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map, in the event that the
owner of Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract 17494, commonly known as the
proposed "Platinum Vista" project (APN 082-26-127 and 082-26-128),
requires to construct a turn-around area on the north terminus of
Collector Street “A”, the property owner/developer shall cooperate with
“Platinum Vista” to grant a temporary easement/right of entry for the
portion of the turn-around lying within the boundary of Parcel 1 and Lot
“A” of Tentative Tract 17494. The geometry of the temporary turn-
around shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer and the Fire
Department.
Public Works,
Development
Services
7 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section and
approved by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include
provisions for maintenance of private facilities such as private sewer,
concrete paver covered street sections, private storm drain improvements,
temporary turn-around areas, if any, and backflow prevention devices such
as flap gates; compliance with approved Water Quality Management Plan;
and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance responsibilities shall include all
drainage devices, sewer system, gates, parkway landscaping and irrigation
on Katella Avenue and Lewis Street, collector public road STREET “A”
and STREET “B”, all lettered lots, and any private street name signs. The
covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the final map.
Public Works,
Development
Services
8 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the final map shall be
submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim Department of Public
Works and the Orange County Surveyor for technical review and that all
applicable conditions of approval have been complied with and then shall
be filed in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Public Works,
Development
Services
9 The legal property owner shall execute a Subdivision Agreement, in a
form approved by the City Attorney, to complete the required public
improvements at the legal property owner’s expense. Said agreement
shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Subdivision Section
approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. In lieu of a Subdivision
Agreement, an amended Development Agreement can be utilized to
satisfy this condition of approval if the required terms are included therein.
Public Works,
Development
Services
10 Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the OWNER shall
demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under California’s General
Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity
by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State
Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification
of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. The
owner shall prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project
site and be available for City review on request.
Public Works,
Development
Services
11 Prior to issuance of the grading permit and right-of-way construction
permit for the storm drain and sewer, whichever occurs first, a Save
Harmless agreement in-lieu of an Encroachment Agreement is required to
be executed, approved by the City and recorded by the applicant on the
property for any storm drains connecting to a City storm drain.
Public Works,
Development
Services
12 Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the property owner shall submit a
final drainage report and project improvement plans that incorporate the
required drainage improvements and the mechanisms proposed in the
Drainage Report. No offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after
grading operations or perimeter wall construction.
Public Works,
Development
Services
13 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property owner/developer shall
submit plans documenting that the design of all aboveground structures
(with the exception of parking structures) shall be at least one foot
higher that the 100-year flood zone, where applicable, unless otherwise
required by the City Engineer. All structures below this level shall be
floodproofed to prevent damage to property or harm to people.
Public Works,
Development
Services
14 The City Engineer shall review the location the project to determine if it
is located within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as
identified in the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If
the project will increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the
appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create
a deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer
shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately
serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Attorney’s Office. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the sewer plans
shall be submitted for review. Prior to issuance of a building permit for
the development project the property owner/developer shall be required
to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer,
to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the
latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure
Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the project area, as
determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof.
Public Works,
Development
Services
15 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit to the
Public Works Department, Development Services Division street
improvement plans for the work on Katella Avenue, Lewis Street, and
collector road street “A” and “B” including but not limited to curb and
gutter, sidewalk and landscape, storm drain, and sewer facilities, and
traffic signals. The landscape and irrigation improvement plans shall be
prepared in accordance with the Public Works Landscape and Irrigation
Manual for Public Street and Highway.
Public Works,
Development
Services
16 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall post a security
to guarantee the construction of public improvements, including storm
drain, water, electrical and sewer, in an amount approved by the City
Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney. The
improvements shall be constructed and operational prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
Public Works,
Development
Services
17 That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the developer shall
install accessible curb access ramps with truncated domes at the
intersection of Lewis Street and collector street “B” and at the
intersection of collector streets “A” and “B” at the parking garage
access, in conformance with Public Works Standard Detail 111-3.
Public Works,
Development
Services
18 Prior to release of posted securities, the public improvements shall be
constructed by the developer and accepted by Construction Services
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Public Works,
Development
Services
19 That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the developer shall
improve the streets as follows: 1) improve Katella Avenue and Lewis
Street per the Platinum Triangle Implementation Master Plan or as
approved by the City Engineer, 2) improve the interior collector streets
“A” and “B” per the Connector and Collector Streets requirements of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and the Platinum Triangle
Implementation Plan.
Public Works,
Development
Services
20 That prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall specifically
indicate that all vehicular ramps and grades conform to all applicable
Engineering Standards.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
21 That prior to issuance of the a building permit for the parking structure,
plans shall demonstrate that at-grade ducts and overhead pipes shall not
encroach in the parking space areas or required vehicle clearance areas.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
22 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit
parallel parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly
labeled on building plans.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
23 That prior to final building and zoning inspection, fire lanes shall be
posted with “No Parking Any Time.” Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
24 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property
owner/developer shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the
property owner/developer of the Platinum Vista project, subject to the
approval of the City Engineer, to provide for cost sharing of the
construction of the public Connector Street between Lewis Street and
Katella Avenue.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
25 That prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a
building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer
shall pay the identified fair share responsibility as determined by the
City as set forth in Mitigation Measures 9-7 and 9-8 of MMP 106C. The
City shall allocate the property owners/developers fair share
contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic
flow, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City.
These improvements consist of any potential mitigation measures
identified in the updated traffic study.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
26 That prior to City acceptance of the public right-of-way improvements
for Katella Avenue, and for the public Connector Street identified in the
Final Site Plan, said streets shall be posted with “No Stopping Any
Time” signs and associated red curbs, except, in the locations where the
Connector Street is improved with designated parking stalls and
designated turn-out areas for loading and unloading. Such signs shall be
shown on street improvement plans submitted by the property
owner/developer for the review and approval by the Public Works
Department. The location of such signs shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Traffic Engineering Manager. The property
owner/developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the
installation of such signs.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
27 Ongoing during project operations, if the Anaheim Police Department
or Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required
to provide temporary traffic control services, the property
owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair share basis if
applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services.
Public Works,
Traffic
Engineering
28 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or
building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first,
the property owner/developer shall install the sanitary sewer facilities,
as required by the City Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum
Triangle.
Public Works,
Development
Services
29 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the final map shall be
submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim Department of Public
Works and the Orange County Surveyor for technical review and that all
applicable conditions of approval have been complied with and then shall
be filed in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Public Works,
Development
Services
30 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall post a security
to guarantee the construction of public works improvements in an
amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the
City Attorney.
Public Works,
Development
Services
EXHIBIT “E”
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
FOR
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17494
RELATED TO PLATINUM VISTA PROJECT
(DEV2012-00060)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED
OFF BY
1 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for Platinum Gateway
and/or Platinum Vista, any existing structures located within the
ultimate right-of-way for connector streets “A” and “B”, Katella Avenue
and Lewis Street shall be demolished.
Public Works,
Development
Services
2 The vehicular access rights to Katella Avenue shall be released and
relinquished to the City of Anaheim.
Public Works,
Development
Services
3 The vehicular access rights to collector public road STREET “A” and
STREET “B”, except at the private street openings, shall be released and
relinquished to the City of Anaheim.
Public Works,
Development
Services
4 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication
(with subordination of easements), including necessary construction
easements, 1) the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to
their property (Katella Avenue) as shown in the Platinum Triangle
Implementation Plan or as approved by the City Engineer, and 2) the
ultimate right-of-way for the interior collector streets “A” and “B” per the
Connector and Collector Streets requirements of the Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts generated by
the project.
Public Works,
Development
Services
5 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map, in the event that the
owner of Parcel 1 of Tentative Tract 17494, commonly known as the
proposed "Platinum Gateway" project (APN 082-26-123 and 082-26-
124), requires to construct Collector Street “A” and/or “B”
improvements, the property owner/developer shall cooperate with
“Platinum Gateway” to grant temporary construction easement(s) where
necessary adjacent to Collector Street “A” and/or “B” lying within the
boundary of Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract 17494.
Public Works,
Development
Services
6 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map, in the event that the
Parcel 1 of Tentative Tract 17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Gateway" project (APN 082-26-123 and 082-26-124), is not
developed, the owner of Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract 17494 shall install a
vehicular turn-around area lying within the boundary of Parcel 1 and
Lot “A” of Tentative Tract 17494. The geometry of the temporary turn-
around shall be reviewed and approved by City Engineer and the Fire
Department.
Public Works,
Development
Services
7 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section and
approved by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include
provisions for maintenance of private facilities such as private sewer,
concrete paver covered street sections, private storm drain improvements,
temporary turn-around areas, if any, and backflow prevention devices such
as flap gates; compliance with approved Water Quality Management Plan;
and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance responsibilities shall include all
drainage devices, sewer system, gates, parkway landscaping and irrigation
on Katella Avenue, collector public road STREET “A” and STREET “B”,
all lettered lots, and any private street name signs. The covenant shall be
recorded concurrently with the final map.
Public Works,
Development
Services
8 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the final map shall be
submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim Department of Public
Works and the Orange County Surveyor for technical review and that all
applicable conditions of approval have been complied with and then shall
be filed in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Public Works,
Development
Services
9 The legal property owner shall execute a Subdivision Agreement, in a
form approved by the City Attorney, to complete the required public
improvements at the legal property owner’s expense. Said agreement
shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Subdivision Section
approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. In lieu of a Subdivision
Agreement, an amended Development Agreement can be utilized to
satisfy this condition of approval if the required terms are included therein.
Public Works,
Development
Services
10 Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the OWNER shall
demonstrate that coverage has been obtained under California’s General
Permit for Stormwater Discharges Associated with Construction Activity
by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State
Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification
of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. The
owner shall prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention
Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the current SWPPP shall be kept at the project
site and be available for City review on request.
Public Works,
Development
Services
11 Prior to issuance of the grading permit and right-of-way construction
permit for the storm drain and sewer, whichever occurs first, a Save
Harmless agreement in-lieu of an Encroachment Agreement is required to
be executed, approved by the City and recorded by the applicant on the
property for any storm drains connecting to a City storm drain.
Public Works,
Development
Services
12 Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the property owner shall submit a
final drainage report and project improvement plans that incorporate the
required drainage improvements and the mechanisms proposed in the
Drainage Report. No offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after
grading operations or perimeter wall construction.
Public Works,
Development
Services
13 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property owner/developer shall
submit plans documenting that the design of all aboveground structures
(with the exception of parking structures) shall be at least one foot
higher that the 100-year flood zone, where applicable, unless otherwise
required by the City Engineer. All structures below this level shall be
floodproofed to prevent damage to property or harm to people.
Public Works,
Development
Services
14 The City Engineer shall review the location the project to determine if it
is located within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as
identified in the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If
the project will increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the
appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create
a deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer
shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately
serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Attorney’s Office. Prior to issuance of a grading permit the sewer plans
shall be submitted for review. Prior to issuance of a building permit for
the development project the property owner/developer shall be required
to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer,
to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the
latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure
Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the project area, as
determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof.
Public Works,
Development
Services
15 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall submit to the
Public Works Department, Development Services Division street
improvement plans for the work on Katella Avenue, collector road street
“A” and “B” including but not limited to curb and gutter, sidewalk and
landscape, storm drain, and sewer facilities, and traffic signals as
applicable. The landscape and irrigation improvement plans shall be
prepared in accordance with the Public Works Landscape and Irrigation
Manual for Public Street and Highway.
Public Works,
Development
Services
16 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer shall post a security
to guarantee the construction of public improvements, including storm
drain, water, electrical and sewer, in an amount approved by the City
Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney. The
improvements shall be constructed and operational prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
Public Works,
Development
Services
17 That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the developer shall
install accessible curb access ramps with truncated domes at the
intersection of collector street “A” at the parking garage access, in
conformance with Public Works Standard Detail 111-3.
Public Works,
Development
Services
18 Prior to release of posted securities, the public improvements shall be
constructed by the developer and accepted by Construction Services
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Public Works,
Development
Services
19 That prior to final building and zoning inspections, the developer shall
improve the streets as follows: 1) improve Katella Avenue per the
Platinum Triangle Implementation Master Plan or as approved by the City
Engineer, 2) improve the interior collector streets “A” per the Connector
and Collector Streets requirements of the Platinum Triangle Master
Land Use Plan and the Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan. Install a
temporary turn-around at the north terminus of Street “A” as required by
the City Engineer and the Fire Department.
Public Works,
Development
Services
20 That prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall specifically
indicate that all vehicular ramps and grades conform to all applicable
Engineering Standards.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
21 That prior to issuance of the a building permit for the parking structure,
plans shall demonstrate that at-grade ducts and overhead pipes shall not
encroach in the parking space areas or required vehicle clearance areas.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
22 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit
parallel parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly
labeled on building plans
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
23 That prior to final building and zoning inspection, fire lanes shall be
posted with “No Parking Any Time.” Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
24 That prior to the final building and zoning inspection, in the event that
the adjacent Platinum Gateway project has not completed the following
improvement, the property owner/developer shall construct the
Connector Street as identified on the Site Plan along the west property
line. These improvements shall include a cul-de-sac at the north end of
the Connector Street, or other turn around area to the satisfaction of the
City Engineer, if it is expected that this project will be in operation prior
to the Platinum Gateway project.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
25 The property owner/developer shall record an easement for cul-de-sac
driveway purposes on the adjacent property to the immediate west, as
approved by the City Engineer.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
26 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property
owner/developer shall enter into a reimbursement agreement with the
property owner/developer of the Platinum Gateway project, subject to
the approval of the City Engineer, to provide for cost sharing of the
construction of the public Connector Street between Lewis Street and
Katella Avenue.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
27 That prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a
building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer
shall pay the identified fair share responsibility as determined by the
City as set forth in Mitigation Measures 9-7 and 9-8 of MMP 106C. The
City shall allocate the property owners/developers fair share
contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic
flow, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City.
These improvements consist of any potential mitigation measures
identified in the updated traffic study.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
28 That prior to City acceptance of the public right-of-way improvements
for Katella Avenue, and for the public Connector Street identified in the
Final Site Plan, said streets shall be posted with “No Stopping Any
Time” signs and associated red curbs, except, in the locations where the
Connector Street is improved with designated parking stalls and
designated turn-out areas for loading and unloading. Such signs shall be
shown on street improvement plans submitted by the property
owner/developer for the review and approval by the Public Works
Department. The location of such signs shall be reviewed and approved
by the City Traffic Engineering Manager. The property
owner/developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the
installation of such signs.
Public Works,
Traffic and
Transportation
Services
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City Council
City of Anaheim
c/o City Clerk
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
______________________________________________________________________________
(Space Above Line For Recorder's Use)
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002B)
BETWEEN
CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
i
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002B)
BETWEEN
CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
RECITALS .......................................................................................................................................1
Section 1. DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................................5
1.1 Assessment District ..................................................................................................5
1.2 Authorizing Ordinance .............................................................................................5
1.3 City ...........................................................................................................................5
1.4 Development ............................................................................................................6
1.5 Development Agreement .........................................................................................6
1.6 Development Agreement Date .................................................................................6
1.7 Development Agreement Statute .............................................................................6
1.8 Development Approvals ..........................................................................................6
1.9 Enabling Ordinance..................................................................................................6
1.10 Existing Land Use Regulations ................................................................................6
1.11 Final Site Plan ..........................................................................................................7
1.12 Gross Floor Area/GFA .............................................................................................7
1.13 Interim Development Fees .......................................................................................7
1.14 Mortgage ..................................................................................................................7
1.15 Mortgagee ................................................................................................................7
1.16 Owner .......................................................................................................................7
1.17 Parking Areas ...........................................................................................................7
1.18 Permitted Development ...........................................................................................7
1.19 Platinum Triangle .....................................................................................................7
1.20 Procedures Resolution .............................................................................................7
1.21 Project ......................................................................................................................8
1.22 Property ....................................................................................................................8
1.23 Support Commercial Uses .......................................................................................8
1.24 Term .........................................................................................................................8
1.25 Zoning Code .............................................................................................................8
Section 2. TERM ......................................................................................................................8
Section 3. BINDING COVENANTS ........................................................................................9
ii
Section 4. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT ...................................................................................9
Section 5. PROJECT LAND USES ..........................................................................................9
Section 6. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................9
6.1 Description of Permitted Buildings .........................................................................9
6.2 Parking Areas ...........................................................................................................9
Section 7. DENSITY OF PERMITTED BUILDINGS ...........................................................10
Section 8. ENFORCEMENT ..................................................................................................10
Section 9. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES....................................................10
9.1 Public Park .............................................................................................................11
9.2 Utilities (Water, Electrical, Gas, Sewer, & Drainage) ...........................................11
9.2.1 Water Service .........................................................................................................11
9.2.2 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains ..........................................................................11
9.3 Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities ................12
9.4 Traffic Circulation Improvements .........................................................................12
Section 10. REIMBURSEMENT PROVISION .......................................................................12
Section 11. DEDICATIONS AND EXACTIONS ....................................................................12
Section 12. FEES, TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ...................................................................12
12.1 Fees, Taxes and Assessments ................................................................................12
12.2 Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees .......................................................13
12.2.1 Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee ................................................................13
12.2.2 General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee ..................................................13
12.2.3 Library Facilities Fee .............................................................................................13
12.3 Excluded Development Fees ..................................................................................13
12.3.1 Water Utilities Fees ................................................................................................13
12.3.2 Electrical Utilities Fees ..........................................................................................13
12.3.3 City Processing Fees ..............................................................................................13
12.4 Platinum Triangle Infrastructure and/or Maintenance Assessment District ..........14
12.5 Accounting of Funds ..............................................................................................14
12.6. Imposition of Increased Fees, Taxes or Assessments ............................................14
Section 13. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ......................................14
Section 14. NEXUS/REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGES ..............................14
Section 15. TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT .............................................................................15
iii
Section 16. EXISTING USES ..................................................................................................15
Section 17. FUTURE APPROVALS ........................................................................................15
17.1 Basis for Denying or Conditionally Granting Future Approvals ...........................15
17.2 Standard of Review ................................................................................................15
17.3 Future Amendments to Final Site Plan ..................................................................15
Section 18. AMENDMENT ......................................................................................................16
18.1 Initiation of Amendment ........................................................................................16
18.2 Procedure ...............................................................................................................16
18.3 Consent ..................................................................................................................16
18.4 Amendments ..........................................................................................................16
18.5 Effect of Amendment to Development Agreement ...............................................16
Section 19. NON-CANCELLATION OF RIGHTS..................................................................16
Section 20. BENEFITS TO CITY ............................................................................................16
Section 21. BENEFITS TO OWNER .......................................................................................17
Section 22. UNDERTAKINGS AND ASSURANCES CONTEMPLATED AND
PROMOTED BY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT STATUTE ........................17
Section 23. RESERVED AUTHORITY ...................................................................................17
23.1 State and Federal Laws and Regulations ...............................................................17
23.2 Model Codes ..........................................................................................................18
23.3 Public Health and Safety ........................................................................................18
Section 24. CANCELLATION .................................................................................................18
24.1 Initiation of Cancellation .......................................................................................18
24.2 Procedure ...............................................................................................................18
24.3 Consent of OWNER and CITY .............................................................................18
Section 25. PERIODIC REVIEW .............................................................................................18
25.1 Time for Review ....................................................................................................18
25.2 OWNER's Submission ...........................................................................................19
25.3 Findings ..................................................................................................................19
25.4 Initiation of Review by City Council .....................................................................19
Section 26. EVENTS OF DEFAULT .......................................................................................19
26.1 Defaults by OWNER .............................................................................................19
26.2 Specific Performance Remedy ...............................................................................20
26.3 Liquidated Damages Remedy ................................................................................20
iv
Section 27. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION ...............................................................21
27.1 Notice to OWNER .................................................................................................21
27.2 Public Hearing .......................................................................................................21
27.3 Decision .................................................................................................................21
27.4 Standard of Review ................................................................................................21
27.5 Implementation ......................................................................................................21
27.6 Schedule for Compliance .......................................................................................21
Section 28. ASSIGNMENT ......................................................................................................22
28.1 Right to Assign ......................................................................................................22
28.2 Release upon Transfer ............................................................................................22
Section 29. NO CONFLICTING ENACTMENTS...................................................................23
Section 30. GENERAL .............................................................................................................23
30.1 Force Majeure ........................................................................................................23
30.2 Construction of Development Agreement .............................................................23
30.3 Severability ............................................................................................................23
30.4 Cumulative Remedies ............................................................................................24
30.5 Hold Harmless Agreement .....................................................................................24
30.6 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge ........................................................24
30.7 Public Agency Coordination ..................................................................................25
30.8 Initiative Measures .................................................................................................25
30.9 Attorneys’ Fees ......................................................................................................25
30.10 No Waiver ..............................................................................................................25
30.11 Authority to Execute ..............................................................................................25
30.12 Notice .....................................................................................................................26
30.12.1 To Owner .........................................................................................................26
30.12.2 To City .............................................................................................................26
30.13 Captions .................................................................................................................27
30.14 Consent ..................................................................................................................27
30.15 Further Actions and Instruments ............................................................................27
30.16 Subsequent Amendment to Authorizing Statute ....................................................27
30.17 Governing Law ......................................................................................................27
30.18 Effect on Title ........................................................................................................27
30.19 Mortgagee Protection .............................................................................................27
30.20 Notice of Default to Mortgagee, Right of Mortgagee to Cure ...............................28
30.21 Bankruptcy .............................................................................................................28
30.22 Disaffirmance .........................................................................................................28
30.23 No Third Party Beneficiaries .................................................................................29
30.24 Project as a Private Undertaking ............................................................................29
30.25 Restrictions ............................................................................................................29
30.26 Recitals ...................................................................................................................29
30.27 Recording ...............................................................................................................29
v
30.28 Title Report ............................................................................................................29
30.29 Entire Agreement ...................................................................................................30
30.30 Successors and Assigns ..........................................................................................30
30.31 OWNER’s Title of Property ..................................................................................30
30.32 Exhibits ..................................................................................................................30
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit "A" Legal Description of the Property
Exhibit "B" Final Site Plan
Exhibit “C” Conditions of Approval
Exhibit “D" Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees
Exhibit “D-1” Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee
Exhibit “D-2" General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee
Exhibit “D-3" Library Facilities Fee
Exhibit "E" Development Requirements and Maintenance Obligations
Exhibit "F" Preliminary Title Reports
1
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2007-00002B)
BETWEEN
CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
This First Amended and Restated Development Agreement (“Development Agreement”)
is entered into this day of , 20__, by and between the CITY OF ANAHEIM,
a charter city and municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and
laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (referred to herein as "OWNER"), pursuant to the authority set
forth in Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division l of Title 7, Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the
California Government Code (the "Development Agreement Statute").
RECITALS
This Development Agreement is predicated upon the following facts:
A. To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in
comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the
State of California adopted the Development Agreement Statute, Sections 65864, et seq., of the
Government Code. The Development Agreement Statute authorizes CITY to enter into binding
development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the
development of such property in order to, among other things: encourage and provide for the
development of public facilities in order to support development projects; provide certainty in the
approval of development projects in order to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation in
project costs and encourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which
will make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public;
provide assurance to the applicants of development projects (1) that they may proceed with their
projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, subject to the conditions of
approval of such projects and provisions of such development agreements, and (2) encourage
private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public economic
costs of development.
B. These Recitals refer to and utilize certain capitalized terms which are defined in this
Development Agreement. The parties intend to refer to those definitions in conjunction with the
use thereof in these Recitals.
C. On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council approved General Plan Amendment No.
2004-00419 setting forth the City’s vision for development of the City of Anaheim (the “General
Plan Amendment”), and certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, adopting Findings
of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Plan
2
(“FEIR No. 330"), in conjunction with its consideration and approval of the General Plan
Amendment, amendment of CITY’s zoning code, and a series of related actions.
D. CITY desires that the approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa
Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5)
on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company Easement on the north (hereinafter
called “Platinum Triangle") be developed as a combination of high quality industrial, office,
commercial and residential uses, as envisioned in the General Plan Amendment.
E. In order to carry out the goals and policies of the General Plan for the Platinum
Triangle, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use
Plan, setting forth the new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
F. To further implement the goals and policies of the General Plan for the Platinum
Triangle, the City Council has established the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone (hereinafter the “PTMU Overlay Zone”) consisting of approximately three hundred and
eighty-three acres within the Platinum Triangle as depicted in the Platinum Triangle Master Land
Use Plan to provide opportunities for high quality well-designed development projects that could
be stand-alone projects or combine residential with non-residential uses including office, retail,
business services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities
within the area.
G. On October 25, 2005, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and the updated and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 332”) to provide for the implementation of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and in conjunction with its consideration and approval
of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning
Code Amendment No. 2004-00036 and a series of related actions.
H. On December 11, 2007, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 334”) in conjunction with its consideration and
approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089,
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to
provide for the implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.
I. On October 26, 2010, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment
No. 2008-00471 and approved an amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan
(Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188) and certified EIR No. 2008-00339, to increase the
maximum number of dwelling units permitted in the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,909 dwelling
units, increase the maximum number of commercial square footage to 4,909,682, increase the
3
maximum number of office square footage to 14,340,522, and add 1,500,000 square feet of
institutional land uses.
J. Section 65865 of the California Government Code allows cities to enter into
development agreements with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property.
K. OWNER represents that at the time of entering into this Development Agreement,
Owner has an equitable interest in approximately 4.13 acres of real property located in the
Katella District of The Platinum Triangle at 1005 through 1105 East Katella Avenue, in the City
of Anaheim, County of Orange (hereinafter "County"), State of California, (hereinafter
collectively called the “Property") in the Platinum Triangle and zoned PTMU Overlay and more
particularly shown and described on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by this
reference. At the time of entering into this Development Agreement, OWNER is in escrow to
acquire ownership of the Property in its entirety in fee, and has paid substantial costs in
connection with said escrow and in pursuing certain land use entitlements for the Property.
L. Prior to entering into this Development Agreement, certain development approvals
and permits were approved by the City for the Property, including (1) Conditional Use Permit
No. 2007-05248, to permit the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages within a full-service
restaurant; (2) Development Agreement No. 2007-00002, to build a 327-unit condominium
project, including a 9,500 square foot full-service restaurant; (3) Amendment No. 1 to
Development Agreement No. 2007-00002, extending the Term of Development Agreement No.
2007-00002 from a period of five years to a period of ten years (“Amendment No. 1”); and (4)
Tentative Tract Map No. 17186, to establish a two-lot (one lettered and one numbered)
residential subdivision (collectively, the “Existing Entitlements”). Development Agreement No.
2007-00002 was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange ("Official Records")
on March 20, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008000129034. Amendment No. 1 was recorded in the
Official Records on June 14, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012000337873. Development Agreement
No. 2007-00002 and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing
Development Agreement". At the time of entering into this Development Agreement, the
Existing Entitlements remain valid and in effect.
M. Upon close of escrow and OWNER’s acquisition of the Property, OWNER desires to
develop the Property in accordance with the provisions of this Development Agreement by
developing a three hundred fifty (350) unit residential apartment project, all as more particularly
set forth in the Final Site Plan (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Project").
N. OWNER has requested a series of actions to replace the Existing Entitlements and
permit development of the Project consistent with the CITY’s vision for The Platinum Triangle
(collectively, the “Project Actions”), including:
1. This First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2007-00002
(Development Agreement No. 2007-00002B) to amend and restated the Existing Development
4
Agreement in its entirety in order to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested
development rights in connection therewith; and
2. Tentative Tract Map No. 17494.
O. CITY desires to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in the CITY's General
Plan and the objectives for the PTMU Overlay Zone as set forth in subsection 18.20.010.020 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code, and finds that the Project will accomplish said goals and
objectives.
P. Pursuant to the Final Site Plan, OWNER will submit tentative maps and/or vesting
tentative maps, if required. OWNER further anticipates the submission of detailed construction
plans and other documentation required by CITY in order for the OWNER to obtain its building
permits.
Q. As consideration for the benefits gained from the vested rights acquired pursuant to
the Development Agreement Statute, to conform with the requirements of the PTMU Overlay
Zone, and to comply with the applicable mitigation measures imposed by Updated and Modified
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 C and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 306 for the
Project, CITY is requiring that OWNER construct and install certain public improvements,
including off-site traffic circulation improvements, and provide other public benefits.
R. In order to avoid any misunderstandings or disputes which may arise from time to
time between OWNER and CITY concerning the proposed development of the Project and to
assure each party of the intention of the other as to the processing of any land use entitlements
which now or hereafter may be required for such development, the parties believe it is desirable
to set forth their intentions and understandings in this Development Agreement. In order for both
CITY and OWNER to achieve their respective objectives, it is imperative that each be as certain
as possible that OWNER will develop and that CITY will permit OWNER to develop the Project
and public improvements as approved by CITY within the time periods provided in this
Development Agreement.
S. CIT Y, as a charter city, has enacted Ordinance No. 4377 on November 23, 1982,
which makes CITY subject to the Development Agreement Statute. Pursuant to Section 65865
of the Development Agreement Statute, CITY adopted Resolution No. 82R-565 (the "Procedures
Resolution") on November 23, 1982. The Procedures Resolution establishes procedures and
requirements for the consideration of development agreements upon receipt of an application.
T. On May 22, 2012, as required by Section 1.0 of the Procedures Resolution, OWNER
submitted to the Planning Department an application for approval of a development agreement
(hereinafter called the "Application"). The Application included a proposed development
agreement (the "Proposed Development Agreement").
5
U. On November 22, 2012, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement
Statute and Section 2.1 of the Procedures Resolution, the Planning Director gave public notice of
the City Planning Commission's intention to consider a recommendation to the City Council
regarding adoption of the Proposed Development Agreement.
V. On December 3, 2012, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement
Statute and Section 2.2 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Planning Commission held a
public hearing on the Application.
W. On that date, the City Planning Commission, after considering the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), including Section 21166 of the California
Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, found and determined
and recommended that the City Council find that previously-certified FSEIR No. 339, together
with Addendum No. 1 thereto, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106C for the Platinum Triangle, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 306, are adequate to serve
as the required environmental documentation for this Development Agreement, and related
Project Actions, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental
documentation need be prepared for this Development Agreement.
X. The Planning Commission further found that the Development Agreement meets the
following standards set forth in Section 2.3 of the Procedures Resolution, to wit, that the
Proposed Project: (a) is consistent with the CITY's existing General Plan, (b) is compatible with
the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed for the applicable zoning district, (c) is
compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area and (d) is not
otherwise detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of CITY. Based
upon the aforesaid findings, the City Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the Application and this Development Agreement pursuant to Resolution No. PC2012-
_____.
Y. On , 20 , as required by Section 65867 of the Development
Agreement Statute and Section 3.1 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Clerk caused public
notice to be given of the City Council's intention to consider adoption of a development
agreement.
Z. On December 18, 2012, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement
Statute and Section 3.2 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Council held a public hearing on
the Application.
AA. On that date, the City Council, after considering the requirements of CEQA,
including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the
CEQA Guidelines, did find and determined that previously-certified FSEIR No. 339, together
with Addendum No. 1 thereto, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106C for the Platinum Triangle, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 306, are adequate to serve
as the required environmental documentation for this Development Agreement, and related
6
Project Actions, and satisfies all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental
documentation need be prepared for this Development Agreement.
BB. On December 18, 2012, the City Council found and determined that this
Development Agreement: (i) is consistent with the CITY's existing General Plan; (ii) is not
otherwise detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of CITY; (iii) is
entered into pursuant to and constitutes a present exercise of the CITY's police power; and (iv) is
entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Section 65867 of the
Development Agreement Statute and the Procedures Resolution.
CC. In preparing and adopting the General Plan and in granting the Development
Approvals, CITY considered the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of CITY and
prepared in this regard an extensive environmental impact report and other studies. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, in preparing and adopting the General Plan and in
granting the Development Approvals, the City Council carefully considered and determined the
projected needs (taking into consideration the planned development of the Project and all other
areas within the CITY) for water service, sewer service, storm drains, electrical facilities,
traffic/circulation infrastructure, police and fire services, paramedic and similar improvements,
facilities and services within the Platinum Triangle, and the appropriateness of the density and
intensity of the development comprising the Project and the needs of the CITY and surrounding
areas for other infrastructure.
DD. On , 20 , the City Council adopted the Authorizing Ordinance
authorizing the execution of this Development Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in the Development Agreement
Statute, as it applies to CITY, and pursuant to the Enabling Ordinance, the Procedures Resolution
and the CITY's inherent powers as a charter city, and pursuant to the mutual promises and
covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. DEFINITIONS.
The following words and phrases are used as defined terms throughout this Development
Agreement, and each defined term shall have the meaning set forth below.
1.1 Assessment District. "Assessment District" for purposes of this Development
Agreement means a special district, assessment district or benefit area existing pursuant to State
law or the charter powers of the CITY for purposes of financing the cost of public improvements,
facilities, services and/or public facilities fees within a distinct geographic area of the CITY.
l.2 Authorizing Ordinance. The "Authorizing Ordinance" means Ordinance No. ______
approving this Development Agreement.
7
l.3 CITY. The "CITY" means the City of Anaheim, a charter city and municipal
corporation, duly organized and existing under its charter and the Constitution and laws of the
State of California.
l.4 Development. "Development" means the improvement of the Property for purposes
of effecting the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project, including, without
limitation: grading, the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project
whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of structures and buildings and
the installation of landscaping.
1.5 Development Agreement. “Development Agreement” means this Development
Agreement and any subsequent amendments to this Development Agreement which have been
made in compliance with the provisions of this Development Agreement, the Development
Agreement Statute, the Enabling Ordinance, and the Procedures Resolution.
l.6 Development Agreement Date. The "Development Agreement Date" means the latest
of (i) the date of recordation in the office of the County Recorder of this Development
Agreement, or a memorandum thereof; (ii) the effective date of the Authorizing Ordinance; and
(iii) the date that OWNER closes escrow on the Property.
l.7 Development Agreement Statute. The "Development Agreement Statute" means
Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code as it exists on the
Development Agreement Date.
1.8 Development Approvals. "Development Approvals" means the Final Site Plan and
all site specific plans, maps, permits and other entitlements to use of every kind and nature
contemplated by the Final Site Plan which are approved or granted by CITY in connection with
development of the Property, including, but not limited to: site plans, tentative and final
subdivision maps, vesting tentative maps, variances, conditional use permits and grading,
building and other similar permits. To the extent any of such site specific plans, maps, permits
and other entitlements to use are amended from time to time, "Development Approvals" shall
include, if OWNER and CITY agree in writing, such matters as so amended. If this
Development Agreement is required by law to be amended in order for "Development
Approvals" to include any such amendments, "Development Approvals" shall not include such
amendments unless and until this Development Agreement is so amended.
1.9 Enabling Ordinance. The "Enabling Ordinance" means Ordinance No. 4377 enacted
by the CITY on November 23, 1982.
1.10 Existing Land Use Regulations. “Existing Land Use Regulations” mean the
ordinances and regulations adopted by the City of Anaheim in effect on the Development
Agreement Date, including the adopting ordinances and regulations that govern the permitted
uses of land, the density and intensity of use, and the design, improvement, construction
standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property, including, but not
8
limited to, the General Plan, the Zoning Code, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan,
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C, and all other ordinances of the
City establishing subdivision standards, park regulations, impact or development fees and
building and improvement standards, but only to the extent the Zoning Ordinance and such other
regulations are not inconsistent with this Development Agreement. Existing Land Use
Regulations do not include non-land use regulations, which includes taxes.
1.11 Final Site Plan. The "Final Site Plan" means the Project as described in this
Development Agreement and conditions with respect thereto, as set forth as Exhibit B attached
hereto and made a part hereof by this reference.
1.12 Gross Floor Area/GFA. "Gross Floor Area" or "GFA" means the gross floor area of
any buildings which are part of the Permitted Development.
1.13 Interim Development Fees. "Interim Development Fees" are the fees imposed
within the Platinum Triangle pending adoption of permanent fee programs by the City as set
forth in Paragraph 12.2 of this Development Agreement.
1.14 Mortgage. "Mortgage" means a mortgage, deed of trust or sale and leaseback
arrangement or other transaction in which the Property, or a portion thereof or an interest therein,
is pledged as security.
1.15 Mortgagee. "Mortgagee" means the holder of the beneficial interest under a
Mortgage, or the owner of the Property, or interest therein, under a Mortgage.
1.16 OWNER. "OWNER" is Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership,
and any person or entity with which or into which Shopoff Advisors, L.P. may merge, and any
person or entity who may acquire substantially all of the assets of Shopoff Advisors, L.P., and
any person or entity who receives any of the rights or obligations of under this Development
Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 28 (Assignment) of this Development
Agreement.
1.17 Parking Areas. The "Parking Areas" means all parking structure(s), and/or all
surface parking servicing the Project.
1.18 Permitted Development. "Permitted Development" includes all buildings
and the Parking Areas as identified in Section 6 of this Development Agreement and as further
set forth in the Final Site Plan. This Development Agreement establishes maximum and
minimum characteristics for all Permitted Development as set forth in the Final Site Plan.
1.19 Platinum Triangle. “Platinum Triangle" means that portion of the City of Anaheim
generally bounded on the east by the Santa Ana River, on the south by the Anaheim city limits,
on the west by the Santa Ana Freeway, and on the north by the Southern California Edison
Easement.
9
1.20 Procedures Resolution. The "Procedures Resolution" is Resolution No. 82R-565
adopted by CITY pursuant to Section 65865 of the Development Agreement Statute.
1.21 Project. The "Project" means the development project contemplated by the Final
Site Plan with respect to the Property, including but not limited to on-site and off-site
improvements, as such development project is further defined, enhanced or modified pursuant to
the provisions of this Development Agreement and the Development Approvals.
1.22 Property. The "Property" means that certain real property shown and described on
Exhibit A to this Development Agreement.
1.24 Term. "Term" is defined in Section 2 of this Development Agreement.
1.25 Zoning Code. “Zoning Code” refers to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Section 2. TERM.
2.1 This Development Agreement is intended to replace the Existing Development
Agreement and to reflect the agreement of the parties to the amendment and restatement of the
Existing Development Agreement.
2.2 The term (hereinafter called "Term") of this Development Agreement shall be that
period of time during which this Development Agreement shall be in effect and bind the parties
hereto. The Term shall commence on the Development Agreement Date and shall extend for a
period of five (5) years thereafter, expiring at the end of the day on the fifth anniversary of the
Development Agreement Date unless extended for an additional five (5) years upon Developer’s
timely request, as discussed in Section 2.3 below, and subject to the periodic review and
modification or termination provisions defined in Section 25 and Section 27, respectively, of this
Development Agreement, and further subject to a reasonable extension for completion of the
Project in accordance with the Timing of Development schedule set forth in Section 15 of this
Development Agreement.
2.3 So long as Developer is not otherwise in default of one or more provisions of this
Development Agreement, Developer may request, and City shall grant upon receipt of a timely
written request from Developer, one extension that will extend the Term for an additional five (5)
years from the date that this Development Agreement is set to expire. Developer shall submit its
written request to extend this Development Agreement to City no sooner than one (1) year, and
no later than thirty (30) days, before this Development Agreement is set to expire. Upon the
submission by Developer of a valid timely written request to extend, and the City’s receipt
thereof, this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be automatically extended for the
additional 5-year period.
10
2.4 This Development Agreement shall terminate and be of no force and effect upon the
occurrence of the entry of a final judgment or issuance of a final order, after all appeals have
been exhausted, directed to CITY as a result of any lawsuit filed against CITY to set aside,
withdraw or abrogate the approval of the City Council of this Development Agreement or if
termination occurs pursuant to the provisions of the Procedures Resolution and such termination
is so intended thereby.
2.5 If not already terminated by reason of any other provision in this Development
Agreement, or for any other reason, this Development Agreement shall automatically terminate
and be of no further force and effect upon completion of the Project pursuant to the terms of this
Development Agreement and any further amendments thereto and the issuance of all occupancy
permits and acceptance by CITY of all dedications and improvements as required by the
development of the Project.
Section 3. BINDING COVENANTS.
The provisions of this Development Agreement to the extent permitted by law shall
constitute covenants which shall run with the Property for the benefit thereof, and the benefits of
this Development Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and all successors
in interest to the parties hereto.
Section 4. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT.
As a material part of the consideration of this Development Agreement, unless otherwise
provided herein, the parties agree that the Existing Land Use Regulations shall be applicable to
development of the Project. In connection with all subsequent discretionary actions by CITY
required to implement the Final Site Plan and any discretionary actions which CITY takes or has
the right to take under this Development Agreement relating to the Project, including any review,
approval, renewal, conditional approval or denial, CITY, shall exercise its discretion or take
action in a manner which complies and is consistent with the Final Site Plan, the Existing Land
Use Regulations and such other standards, terms and conditions expressly contained in this
Development Agreement. CITY shall accept and timely process, in the normal manner for
processing such matters as may then be applicable, all applications for further approvals with
respect to the Project called for or required under this Development Agreement, including, any
necessary site plan, tentative map, vesting tentative map, final map and any grading, construction
or other permits filed by OWNER in accordance with the Development Approvals.
Section 5. PROJECT LAND USES.
5.1 The Property shall be used for such uses as may be permitted by the Development
Approvals and the Existing Land Use Regulations. The Term, the density and intensity of use,
developable GFA, footprint square footage, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings
and structures, lot sizes, set back requirements, zoning, public improvements, and the provisions
for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the
11
Development Approvals, the Existing Land Use Regulations and this Development Agreement
pursuant to Section 65865.2 of the Development Agreement Statute.
Section 6. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT.
6.1 Description of Permitted Development. The Permitted Development shall be as set
forth on the Final Site Plan. The Project shall be constructed substantially in conformance with
the Final Site Plan.
6.2 Parking Areas. The Parking Areas shall be constructed so that there will be sufficient
parking spaces available within the Property to serve the Project, as depicted and substantially in
conformance with the Final Site Plan. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the Owner
shall record a covenant against the property in a form approved by the City Attorney’s Office that
requires Owner and its heirs, assignees and successor-in-interests to reimburse the City for the
full cost associated with the use of any Police Department and/or Traffic Management Center
staff that may be needed for traffic control purposes related to the use of Parking Areas for public
parking in connection with events in the Platinum Triangle, including events at Angel Stadium,
the Honda Center, or the Grove of Anaheim.
Section 7. DENSITY OF PERMITTED BUILDINGS.
The Permitted Buildings shall be between the minimum and maximum sizes, and shall
not exceed the maximum heights and maximum footprints set forth on the Final Site Plan.
Section 8. ENFORCEMENT.
Unless this Development Agreement is terminated or cancelled pursuant to the provisions
of this Development Agreement, this Development Agreement or any amendment hereto, shall
be enforceable by any party hereto notwithstanding any change hereafter in any applicable
general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance or building ordinance
adopted by CITY which alters or amends the rules, regulations or policies of Development of the
Project as provided in this Development Agreement pursuant to Section 65865.4 of the
Development Agreement Statute; provided, however, that the limitations of this Section shall not
apply to changes mandated by State or Federal laws or other permissible changes or new
regulations as more particularly set forth in Section 23 of this Development Agreement.
Section 9. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES.
In addition to performing any other obligations heretofore imposed as conditions of
approval set forth in Exhibit C, as material consideration for the CITY's entering into this
Development Agreement, OWNER shall undertake the construction and installation of the
following public improvements required to support the Project and to enhance area-wide traffic
circulation and emergency police and fire protection service within the time periods as set forth
below and in conformance with the Existing Land Use Regulations. CITY shall cooperate with
12
OWNER for the purpose of coordinating all public improvements constructed under the
Development Approvals or this Development Agreement to existing or newly constructed public
improvements, whether located within or outside of the Property. OWNER shall be responsible
for and use good faith efforts to acquire any right(s)-of-way necessary to construct the public
facility improvements required by, or otherwise necessary to comply with the conditions of, this
Development Agreement or any Development Approvals. Should it become necessary due to
OWNER's failure or inability to acquire said right(s)-of-way within four months after OWNER
begins its efforts to so acquire said right(s)-of-way, CITY shall negotiate the purchase of the
necessary right(s)-of-way to construct the public improvements as required by, or otherwise
necessary to comply with the conditions of, this Development Agreement and, if necessary in
accordance with the procedures established by State law, and the limitations hereinafter set forth
in this Section, CITY may use its powers of eminent domain to condemn said required right(s)-of
way. OWNER agrees to pay for all costs associated with said acquisition and condemnation
proceedings. If the CITY cannot make the proper findings or if for some other reason under the
condemnation laws CITY is prevented from acquiring the necessary right(s)-of-way to enable
OWNER to construct the public improvements required by, or otherwise necessary to comply
with the conditions of, this Development Agreement, then the parties agree to amend this
Development Agreement to modify OWNER's obligations accordingly. Any such required
modification shall involve the substitution of other considerations or obligations by OWNER (of
similar value) as are negotiated in good faith between the parties hereto. Nothing contained in
this Section shall be deemed to constitute a determination or resolution of necessity by CITY to
initiate condemnation proceedings.
9.1 Public Park. Section 18.20.110.0101 of the Zoning Code requires that, if the
Property is eight (8) or more acres with residential development totaling more than 325 dwelling
units, Owner shall be required to dedicate, improve and maintain a minimum size of 44 square
feet for each residential unit for public park purposes. However, while the number of dwelling
units to be constructed on the Property will exceed 325 units, the Property is less than eight (8)
acres in size and, in accordance with Section 18.20.110.0102 of the Zoning Code, is, therefore,
not subject to the park land dedication requirements in Section 18.20.110.0101 of the Zoning
Code, and, instead, is subject to the requirement to pay park in-lieu fees under Sections
18.20.110.0102 and 17.08.260 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The amount of the park in-lieu
fees shall be based on the current adopted park in-lieu fee in effect at the time of payment of the
fees.
9.2 Utilities (Water, Electrical, Gas, Sewer, and Drainage). OWNER shall construct
the public improvements necessary for the provision of requisite water, electrical, gas, sewer and
drainage requirements for Project as more fully set forth in the Development Approvals.
OWNER shall construct and relocate utilities as may be required to provide services to the
Permitted Development on the Property or that are displaced by the construction of the Permitted
Development. As OWNER submits detailed construction plans in order to obtain building
permits for the Permitted Development and/or the size and nature of the Project varies, the
utilities that OWNER will construct or relocate may be revised accordingly by the CITY.
13
9.2.1 Water Service. OWNER will provide engineering studies to size the water mains
for ultimate development within the Project. Said engineering studies will be conducted prior to
rendering of water service or signature approval of the final water improvement plans, whichever
occurs first. The studies shall be subject to the approval of the General Manager, Public Utilities
Department or authorized designee. Alternatively, at OWNER’S election, the water system may
be constructed incrementally, provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide
municipal demands and fire flow protection for the proposed development phasing. OWNER
will conform with Rule 15D of the Water Utility's Rates, Rules and Regulations which provides
for, in part, a fee based on GFA and the advancement of additional funds to construct the
upgraded water facilities. OWNER shall be entitled to reimbursement in accordance with the
terms of Rule l5D for the advancement of additional funds to construct the upgraded water
facilities.
9.2.2 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains. Prior to final building and zoning inspections
for the first building within the Permitted Development, OWNER will construct all sanitary
sewers and storm drains and appurtenant structures (including treatment control BMP’s as
required by the WQMP) to serve the ultimate development of the Property as provided by
areawide engineering studies to be conducted prior to issuance of any building permits for the
first building within the Permitted Development and updated prior to the issuance of any building
permits for each subsequent building within the Permitted Development. All studies shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer. OWNER will construct improvements identified in
said studies. The systems may be constructed incrementally subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide capacity for the proposed
development phasing.
9.3 Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities. The timing,
phasing and sequence of the construction of public improvements and facilities or the payment
of fees therefor shall be constructed or paid in accordance with the timing, phasing and sequence
set forth in this Development Agreement and the Final Site Plan
9.4 Traffic Circulation Improvements. In order to assist CITY in providing for area-wide
traffic circulation as required by this Project, OWNER shall cause to be made the traffic
circulation improvements identified for the Project including all applicable measures from the
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with
Subsequent EIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 306, as shown on the Final Site
Plan.
Section 10. [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED].
Section 11. DEDICATIONS AND EXACTIONS.
OWNER hereby agrees to and shall arrange for dedication to CITY of the ultimate rights-
of-way needed by CITY for the widening of Katella Avenue adjacent to the Property as soon as
possible following the date of adoption of the Authorizing Ordinance but not, in any event, later
14
than ninety (90) days following the Development Agreement Date. Since OWNER may not be
the owner in fee of the Property upon adoption of the Authorizing Ordinance, OWNER hereby
agrees to use its best good faith efforts to arrange for the owner of the Property to irrevocably
offer for dedication to CITY said rights-of-way prior to OWNER'S acquisition of the Property.
If OWNER is unable to arrange for the current owner of the Property to dedicate to CITY
the ultimate public rights-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue adjacent to the
Property prior to OWNER'S acquisition of the Property, OWNER nevertheless agrees to and
shall irrevocably offer for dedication to CITY the rights-of-way needed by CITY for the
widening of Katella Avenue adjacent to the Property following OWNER'S acquisition of the
Property at such time as the City Engineer deems necessary and appropriate but not, in any event,
later than ninety (90) days following the Development Agreement Date.
To the extent that OWNER has arranged for the dedication to CITY of the ultimate public
rights-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue adjacent to the Property prior to
taking title to the Property, CITY hereby agrees to and shall either (1) reimburse OWNER for
the substantiated actual cost it has paid to the owner of the Property in exchange for the
dedication by said owner to CITY of the land area constituting the ultimate public right-of-way
necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue, or (2) pay said owner directly an amount equal to
the product obtained by multiplying the square footage of the land area comprising the ultimate
public right-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue dedicated by said owner to
CITY by the per-square-foot price paid or agreed to be paid by OWNER to the owner for the
Property; provided, however, that, in either event, the City's total obligation under this
paragraph shall be the lesser of (i) the product obtained by multiplying the square footage of the
land area comprising the ultimate public right-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella
Avenue by the per-square-foot price (which is to be calculated based on the purchase price paid
(or to be paid) by OWNER to said owner of the Property plus OWNER-paid closing costs and
expenses (e.g., sales commission, title policy, etc.), if any, in connection with OWNER’s
acquisition of the Property) (the “Dedication Cost”), or (ii) the maximum amount allowable for
right-of-way acquisition set forth in the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District
Implementation Plan (herein the "Implementation Plan"). To the extent that the amount payable
by CITY to the owner of the Property for the land area comprising the ultimate public right-of-
way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue is less than the amount OWNER paid
therefor to said owner, CITY shall not be responsible for payment to said owner of any
differential.
To the extent that OWNER, rather than the current owner of the Property, irrevocably
offers for dedication to CITY the land area determined necessary by CITY for the widening of
Katella Avenue, CITY hereby agrees to and shall pay OWNER the lesser of (i) the Dedication
Cost, or (ii) the maximum amount allowable for right-of-way acquisition set forth in the
Implementation Plan.
15
Funding for the acquisition of the ultimate public right-of-way necessary for the widening
of Katella Avenue shall be paid through and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the
existing Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District.
OWNER hereby agrees to and shall enter into any right-of-entry agreement and/or
temporary construction easements deemed necessary and appropriate and in a form acceptable to
the City Engineer, at no cost to CITY, for the purpose of allowing CITY to construct, or cause to
be constructed, the roadway improvements along Katella Avenue, including transitions to
private driveways, walkways, landscaping, and relocation of signage from the dedicated area
and other temporary needs as determined by the City Engineer. OWNER shall work
cooperatively with the City in planning, design, and construction of the roadway improvements.
In addition, prior to issuance of the first building permit for the Project, OWNER shall
irrevocably offer for dedication the rights-of-way, including the public connector streets and
collector streets, if applicable, and other areas as more fully set forth in the Tentative Tract Map
and the Final Site Plan for the uses set forth in the Tentative Tract Map and the Final Site Plan.
These dedications shall be in fee or as an easement at the discretion of CITY, and upon
completion and acceptance by CITY of the associated improvements in compliance with the
specifications as approved by CITY, CITY may accept OWNER's offer of dedication. Nothing
contained in this Development Agreement, however, shall be deemed to preclude CITY from
exercising the power of eminent domain with respect to the Property or the Project, or any part
thereof.
Section 12. FEES, TAXES, AND ASSESSMENTS.
12.1 Fees, Taxes and Assessments. OWNER shall be responsible for the payment of
fees in the amount and at the times set forth in the Existing Land Use Regulations, as said
amounts and timing may be modified in accordance with this Development Agreement.
12.2 Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees. CITY anticipates that a number of
fees will be adopted to pay the costs attributable to new development in the Platinum Triangle.
The Interim Development Fees constitute amounts estimated by the applicable City Departments
to be the approximate fair share of costs attributable to the Project. If an identified fee has been
adopted prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Project, the OWNER shall pay
the fee. If an identified fee has not been adopted prior to the issuance of said certificate of
occupancy, the OWNER shall pay the applicable Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees
set forth in attached Exhibit D. If the OWNER has paid a Platinum Triangle Interim
Development Fee, and upon subsequent adoption of a corresponding fee it is determined that the
OWNER has paid an amount greater than the amount payable pursuant to the adopted fee, the
excess amount paid as an Interim Development Fee shall be refunded to the OWNER. CITY
shall not be obligated to adopt any of the identified fees. If any such identified fee is not adopted,
the parties agree that the Interim Development Fee is adequate to address the impacts of the
Project.
16
12.2.1 Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee. OWNER will pay an Electrical Utilities
Undergrounding Fee as set forth in Exhibit D-1.
12.2.2 General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee. OWNER will pay a processing
FEE attributable to the cost of creating and establishing the Master Land Use Plan and the PTMU
Overlay Zone for the Platinum Triangle, as well as the costs of associated environmental
documentation, as said additional costs are set forth in Exhibit D-2.
12.2.3 Library Facilities Fee. OWNER will pay a Library Facilities Fee as set forth in
Exhibit D-3.
12.3 Excluded Development Fees. Fees Excluded from Existing Land Use Regulations.
The following fees shall not be included among the fees which would otherwise fall within the
definition of Existing Land Use Regulations:
12.3.1 Water Utilities Fees. OWNER will pay all applicable fees in accordance with the
Water Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations in effect at the time of application for service
including Rule 15D which provides for, in part, a fee based on GFA to construct the necessary
water facility improvements within the Platinum Triangle.
12.3.2 Electrical Utilities Fees. OWNER will pay all fees in accordance with the
Electrical Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations in effect at the time of application for service.
12.3.3 City Processing Fees. OWNER shall pay all standard City-wide processing fees
for building permits, zoning review, and other similar fees associated with the Development of
the Project which are in existence at the time of approval of this Development Agreement at the
rate in existence at the time said fees are normally required to be paid to CITY.
12.4 Platinum Triangle Infrastructure and/or Maintenance Assessment District. Prior to
the date a building or grading permit is issued relating to implementation of the Final Site Plan,
or within a period of ninety (90) days from the date of execution of this Development
Agreement, whichever occurs first, OWNER shall execute and record an unsubordinated
covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney’s Office wherein OWNER agrees not to
contest the formation of any assessment district(s) which may be formed to finance Platinum
Triangle infrastructure and/or maintenance, which district(s) could include the Property. The
covenant shall not preclude OWNER from contesting (i) the determination of benefit of such
improvements to the Property, (ii) the properties included in said district or area, (iii) the manner
in which said fee is determined or (iv) the manner in which said improvement costs are spread.
12.5 Accounting of Funds. CITY will comply with applicable requirements of
Government Code Section 65865 relating to accounting of funds.
12.6 Imposition of Increased Fees, Taxes or Assessments. Except as expressly set forth
or reserved in this Development Agreement, CITY shall not, without the prior written consent of
17
OWNER, impose any additional fee, tax or assessment on the Project or any portion thereof as a
condition to the implementation of the Project or any portion thereof, except such fees, taxes and
assessments as are described in or required by this Development Agreement, including the
Existing Land Use Regulations or the Development Approvals. The rates of such fees, taxes and
assessments shall be the rates in existence at the time said fees, taxes and assessments are
normally required to be paid to CITY, except as otherwise provided in this Development
Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit CITY from imposing fees,
taxes or assessments on the Property which are unrelated to the approval or implementation of
the project.
Section 13. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS.
In consideration for CITY entering into this Development Agreement and other
consideration set forth in this Development Agreement, OWNER agrees, if deemed by the
Planning Director with the advice of the City Attorney to be applicable and required for the
Property, to record unsubordinated covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) applicable to
the Property in a form and content satisfactory to the Planning Director, City Engineer and the
City Attorney incorporating the requirements and obligations set forth in Exhibit E to this
Development Agreement, entitled the “Development Requirements and Maintenance
Obligations.”
Section 14. NEXUS/REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGES.
OWNER consents to, and waives any right it may have now or in the future to challenge
the legal validity of the conditions, requirements, policies or programs required by Existing Land
Use Regulations or this Development Agreement including, without limitation, any claim that
they constitute an abuse of the police power, violate substantive due process, deny equal
protection of the laws, effect a taking of property without payment of just compensation, or
impose an unlawful tax.
Section 15. TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT.
Timing of Development shall be as set forth in the Final Site Plan.
Section 16. EXISTING USES.
CITY and OWNER agree that those existing legally established uses on the Property may
be retained until the Project is implemented. When those existing uses are demolished, no credit
for any such demolished square footage for which Interim Development Fees have not been paid
will be given OWNER against Interim Development Fees due on a square footage basis as
provided for in this Development Agreement. OWNER will pay the full Interim Development
Fees for Permitted Development constructed pursuant to the Final Site Plan.
Section 17. FUTURE APPROVALS.
18
17.1 Basis for Denying or Conditional Granting Future Approvals. Before OWNER can
begin grading on the Property or other development of the Property, OWNER must secure
several additional permits and/or approvals from CITY. The parties agree that to the extent said
Development Approvals are ministerial in nature, CITY shall not, through the enactment or
enforcement of any subsequent ordinances, rules, regulations, initiatives, policies, requirements,
guidelines, or other constraints, withhold such approvals as a means of blocking construction or
of imposing conditions on the Project which were not imposed during an earlier approval period
unless CITY has been ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the
previous sentence, CITY and OWNER will use their best efforts to ensure each other that all
applications for and approvals of grading permits, building permits or other developmental
approvals necessary for OWNER to develop the Project in accordance with the Final Site Plan
are sought and processed in a timely manner.
17.2 Standard of Review. The rules, regulations and policies that apply to any additional
Development Approvals which OWNER must secure prior to the Development of the Property
shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations, as defined in this Development Agreement.
17.3 Future Amendments to Final Site Plan. Future amendments to all or a portion of the
Final Site Plan which increase the intensity or density of the Development of the Property, or
change the permitted uses of the Property, and are not among those described in Section 18.4 of
this Development Agreement may subject the portion or portions of the Project being amended
or affected by the amendment to any change in the CITY's General Plan, zoning designations and
rules applicable to the Property and further environmental review and possible mitigation of
adverse impacts under CEQA in effect at the time of such amendment. Any such amendment to
the Final Site Plan shall be processed concurrently with the processing of an amendment to this
Development Agreement. It is the desire and intent of both parties, except as set forth herein, that
any such future amendment of the Final Site Plan will not alter, affect, impair or otherwise
impact the rights, duties and obligations of the parties under this Development Agreement with
respect to the unamended portions of the Final Site Plan.
Section l8. AMENDMENT.
18.1 Initiation of Amendment. Either party may propose an amendment to this
Development Agreement.
18.2 Procedure. Except as set forth in Section 18.4 below, the procedure for proposing
and adopting an amendment to this Development Agreement shall be the same as the procedure
required for entering into this Development Agreement in the first instance. Such procedures are
set forth in Sections 2, 3 and 5 of the Procedures Resolution.
18.3 Consent. Except as provided elsewhere within this Development Agreement, any
amendment to this Development Agreement shall require the consent of both parties. No
19
amendment of this Development Agreement or any provision hereof shall be effective unless set
forth in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of each party hereto.
18.4 Amendments. Subject to the foregoing provisions of this Section, the parties
acknowledge that refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that
changes are appropriate with respect to the details and performance of the parties under this
Development Agreement. The parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect
to the details of the Development of the Project and with respect to those items covered in
general terms under this Development Agreement. If and when the parties find that changes or
adjustments are necessary or appropriate to further the intended purposes of this Development
Agreement, they may, unless otherwise required by law, effectuate such changes or adjustments
as specified in the Development Approvals.
l8.5 Effect of Amendment to Development Agreement. The parties agree that except as
expressly set forth in any such amendment, an amendment to this Development Agreement will
not alter, affect, impair, modify, waive or otherwise impact any other rights, duties or obligations
of either party under this Development Agreement.
Section l9. NON-CANCELLATION OF RIGHTS.
Subject to defeasance pursuant to Sections 25, 26 or 27 of this Development Agreement,
the Final Site Plan and other Development Approvals as provided for in this Development
Agreement shall be final and the rights once granted thereby shall be vested in the Property upon
recordation of this Development Agreement.
Section 20. BENEFITS TO CITY.
The direct and indirect benefits CITY (including, without limitation, the existing and
future anticipated residents of CITY) expects to receive pursuant to this Development Agreement
include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. The participation of OWNER in the accelerated, coordinated and more economic
construction, funding and dedication to the public, as provided in this Development Agreement,
of certain of the vitally needed on-site and area-wide public improvements and facilities, and
assurances that the entire Project will be developed as set forth in the Final Site Plan and this
Development Agreement in order to encourage development of the Platinum Triangle; and
b. The considerations set forth in Sections 9 and 10 of this Development Agreement.
Section 21. BENEFITS TO OWNER.
OWNER has expended and will continue to expend large amounts of time and money on
the planning and infrastructure construction for the Project. OWNER asserts that OWNER
would not make any additional expenditures, or the advanced expenditures required by this
20
Development Agreement, without this Development Agreement and that any additional
expenditures which OWNER makes after the Development Agreement Date will be made in
reliance upon this Development Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
this Development Agreement provides for the completion of public improvements and facilities
prior to the time when they would be justified economically in connection with the phasing of the
Project, and of a size which would be justified only by the magnitude of the Project provided for
by the Final Site Plan and this Development Agreement. The benefit to OWNER under this
Development Agreement consists of the assurance that OWNER will preserve the right to
develop the Property as planned and as set forth in the Final Site Plan and this Development
Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the public benefits to be provided by OWNER to
CITY pursuant to this Development Agreement are in consideration for and reliance upon
assurances that the Property can be developed in accordance with the Final Site Plan and this
Development Agreement.
Section 22. UNDERTAKINGS AND ASSURANCES CONTEMPLATED AND
PROMOTED BY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT STATUTE.
The mutual undertakings and assurances described above and provided for in this
Development Agreement are for the benefit of CITY and OWNER and promote the
comprehensive planning, private and public cooperation and participation in the provision of
public facilities, and the effective and efficient development of infrastructure and facilities
supporting development which was contemplated and promoted by the Development Agreement
Statute. CITY agrees that it will not take any actions which are intended to circumvent this
Development Agreement; provided, however, that any action of the electorate shall not be
deemed an action for purposes of this section.
Section 23. RESERVED AUTHORITY.
23.1 State and Federal Laws and Regulations. In the event that the State or Federal laws
or regulations enacted after this Development Agreement has been entered into, prevent or
preclude compliance with one or more provisions of the Development Agreement, such
provisions of the Development Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary
to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that this
Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent
with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such
remaining provisions impractical to enforce. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY shall not
adopt or undertake any rule, regulation or policy which is inconsistent with this Development
Agreement until CITY makes a finding that such rule, regulation or policy is reasonably
necessary to comply with such State and Federal laws or regulations.
23.2. Model Codes. This Development Agreement shall not prevent CITY from
applying new rules, regulations and policies contained in model codes, including, but not limited
to, the Anaheim Building Code as adopted in Title 15, Section 15.02.
21
23.3 Public Health and Safety. This Development Agreement shall not prevent CITY
from adopting new rules, regulations and policies, including amendments or modifications to
model codes described in Section 23.2 of this Development Agreement which directly result
from findings by CITY that failure to adopt such rules, regulations or policies would result in a
condition injurious or detrimental to the public health and safety. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
CITY shall not adopt any such rules, regulations or policies which prevent or preclude
compliance with one or more provisions of this Development Agreement until CITY makes a
finding that such rules, regulations or policies are reasonably necessary to correct or avoid such
injurious or detrimental condition.
Section 24. CANCELLATION.
24.1 Initiation of Cancellation. Either party may propose cancellation of this
Development Agreement.
24.2 Procedure. The procedure for proposing a cancellation of and canceling this
Development Agreement shall be the same as the procedure required for entering into this
Development Agreement in the first instance. Such procedures are set forth in Sections 2, 3 and
5 of the Procedures Resolution and Section 65868 of the Government Code.
24.3 Consent of OWNER and CITY. Any cancellation of this Development Agreement
shall require the mutual consent of OWNER and CITY.
Section 25. PERIODIC REVIEW.
25.1 Time for Review. CITY shall, at least every twelve (12) months after the
Development Agreement Date, review the extent of good faith compliance by OWNER with the
terms of this Development Agreement. OWNER's failure to comply with the timing schedules
set forth in the Final Site Plan shall constitute rebuttable evidence of OWNER's lack of good
faith compliance with this Development Agreement. Such periodic review shall determine
compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement pursuant to California Government
Code Section 65865.1 and other successor laws and regulations.
25.2 OWNER's Submission. Each year, not less than forty-five (45) days nor more than
sixty (60) days prior to the anniversary of the Development Agreement Date, OWNER shall
submit evidence to the City Council of its good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of
this Development Agreement. OWNER shall notify the City Council in writing that such
evidence is being submitted to CITY pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.2 of the
Procedures Resolution. OWNER shall pay to CITY a reasonable processing fee in an amount as
CITY may reasonably establish from time to time on each occasion that OWNER submits its
evidence for a periodic review.
25.3 Findings. Within forty-five (45) days after the submission of OWNER's evidence,
the City Council shall determine, on the basis of substantial evidence, whether or not OWNER
22
has, for the period under review, complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this
Development Agreement. If the City Council finds that OWNER has so complied, the review for
that period shall be deemed concluded. If the City Council finds and determines, on the basis of
substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions
of this Development Agreement for the period under review, OWNER shall be given at least
sixty (60) days to cure such non-compliance and if the actions required to cure such non-
compliance take more than sixty (60) days, then CITY shall give OWNER additional time
provided that OWNER is making reasonable progress towards such end. If during the cure
period, OWNER fails to cure such noncompliance or is not making reasonable good faith
progress towards such end, then the City Council may, at its discretion, proceed to modify or
terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for compliance in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 27 of this Development Agreement.
25.4 Initiation of Review by City Council. In addition to the periodic review set forth in
this Development Agreement, the City Council may at any time initiate a review of this
Development Agreement upon the giving of written notice thereof to OWNER. Within thirty
(30) days following receipt of such notice, OWNER shall submit evidence to the City Council of
OWNER's good faith compliance with this Development Agreement and such review and
determination shall proceed in the manner as otherwise provided in this Development
Agreement.
Section 26. EVENTS OF DEFAULT.
26.1 Defaults by OWNER. Within forty-five (45) days after the submission of
OWNER's evidence, the City Council shall determine on the basis of substantial evidence,
whether or not OWNER has, for the period under review, complied in good faith with the terms
and conditions of this Development Agreement. If the City Council finds that OWNER has so
complied, the review for that period shall be deemed concluded. If the City Council finds and
determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith
with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement for the period under review,
OWNER shall be given at least sixty (60) days to cure such non-compliance and if the actions
required to cure such non-compliance take more than sixty (60) days, then CITY shall give
OWNER additional time provided that OWNER is making reasonable progress towards such
end. If during the cure period OWNER fails to cure such non-compliance or is not making
reasonable progress towards such end, then the City Council may, at its discretion, proceed to
modify or terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for compliance in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 27 of this Development Agreement.
26.2 Specific Performance Remedy. Due to the size, nature and scope of the Project, it
will not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its pre-existing condition once
implementation of this Development Agreement has begun. After such implementation,
OWNER may be foreclosed from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property and
provide for other benefits. OWNER has invested significant time and resources and performed
extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Development
23
Agreement and will be investing even more significant time in implementing the Project in
reliance upon the terms of this Development Agreement, and it is not possible to determine sum
of the money which would adequately compensate OWNER for such efforts. For the above
reasons, CITY and OWNER agree that damages would not be an adequate remedy if CITY fails
to carry out its obligations under this Development Agreement. Therefore, specific performance
of this Development Agreement is the only remedy which would compensate OWNER if CITY
fails to carry out its obligations under this Development Agreement, and CITY hereby agrees that
OWNER shall be entitled to specific performance in the event of a default by CITY hereunder.
CITY and OWNER acknowledge that, if OWNER fails to carry out its obligations under this
Development Agreement, CITY shall have the right to refuse to issue any permits or other
approvals which OWNER would otherwise have been entitled to pursuant to this Development
Agreement. If CITY issues a permit or other approval pursuant to this Development Agreement
in reliance upon a specified condition being satisfied by OWNER in the future, and if OWNER
then fails to satisfy such condition, CITY shall be entitled to specific performance for the sole
purpose of causing OWNER to satisfy such condition. The CITY's right to specific performance
shall be limited to those circumstances set forth above, and CITY shall have no right to seek
specific performance to cause OWNER to otherwise proceed with the Development of the
Project in any manner.
26.3 Liquidated Damages Remedy. The parties hereto agree that this Development
Agreement creates an obligation and duty upon OWNER to undertake and complete development
of the Project within the time and manner specified herein. In the event OWNER breaches this
Development Agreement by failing to undertake and complete development of the Project within
the time and manner specified herein, the parties further agree that CITY will suffer actual
damages as a result thereof, the amount of which is uncertain and would be impractical or
extremely difficult to fix; therefore, OWNER agrees to pay CITY, in the event of any such
breach by OWNER, the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) as liquidated and
actual damages which sum shall be in addition to any other remedies available to CITY as a
result of such breach pursuant to this Section 26.
Section 27. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION.
If pursuant to Section 26.1 of this Development Agreement, CITY elects to modify or
terminate this Development Agreement or establish a revised time schedule for compliance as
herein provided, then CITY shall proceed as set forth in this Section.
27.1 Notice to OWNER. CITY shall give notice to OWNER of City Council's intention
to proceed to modify or terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for
compliance within ten (10) days of making the CITY’s findings.
27.2 Public Hearing. The City Council shall set and give notice of a public hearing on
modification, termination or a time schedule for compliance to be held within forty-days after the
City Council gives notice to OWNER.
24
27.3 Decision. The City Council shall announce its findings and decisions on whether
this Development Agreement is to be terminated, how this Development Agreement is to be
modified or the provisions of the Development Agreement with which OWNER must comply
and a time schedule therefor not more than ten (10) days following completion of the public
hearing.
27.4 Standard of Review. Any determination by CITY to terminate this Development
Agreement because OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Development
Agreement must be based upon a finding by the City Council, based on the preponderance of
evidence, that OWNER is in default and has not cured that default in the timeframe permitted by
Sections 25 and 26 above, as applicable.
27.5 Implementation. Amending or terminating this Development Agreement shall be
accomplished by CITY enacting an ordinance. The ordinance shall recite the reasons which, in
the opinion of the CITY, make the amendment or termination of this Development Agreement
necessary. Not later than ten (10) days following the adoption of the ordinance, one copy thereof
shall be forwarded to OWNER. This Development Agreement shall be terminated or this
Development Agreement as modified shall become effective on the effective date of the
ordinance terminating or modifying this Development Agreement.
27.6 Schedule for Compliance. Setting a reasonable time schedule for compliance with
this Development Agreement may be accomplished by CITY enacting a resolution. The
resolution shall recite the reasons which, in the opinion of CITY, make it advisable to set a
schedule for compliance and why the time schedule is reasonable. Not later than ten (10) days
following adoption of the resolution, one copy thereof shall be forwarded to OWNER.
Compliance with any time schedule so established as an alternative to amendment or termination
shall be subject to periodic review as provided in this Development Agreement and lack of good
faith compliance by OWNER with the time schedule shall be basis for termination or
modification of this Development Agreement.
Section 28. ASSIGNMENT.
28.1 Right to Assign. OWNER shall have the right to sell, mortgage, hypothecate, assign
or transfer this Development Agreement, and any and all of the rights, duties and obligations
hereunder, to an OWNER-controlled and/or OWNER-affiliated entity, including TSG Platinum,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, in OWNER’s discretion and without the need to obtain
further CITY consent, at any time after this Development Agreement becomes effective. Further,
OWNER shall have the right to sell, mortgage, hypothecate, assign or transfer this Development
Agreement, and any and all of its rights, duties and obligations hereunder, to any person,
partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Development
Agreement, provided that any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer must be
pursuant to a sale, assignment or other transfer of the interest of OWNER in the Property, or a
portion thereof. In the event of any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer,
(a) OWNER shall notify CITY of such event and the name of the transferee, together with the
25
corresponding entitlements being transferred to such transferee and (b) the agreement between
OWNER and such transferee shall provide that either OWNER or the transferee or both shall be
liable for the performance of all obligations of OWNER pursuant to this Development
Agreement and the Development Approvals. Such transferee and/or OWNER shall notify CITY
in writing which entity shall be liable for the performance of such obligations, and upon the
express written assumption of any or all of the obligations of OWNER under this Development
Agreement by such assignee, transferee or purchaser shall, without any act of or concurrence by
CITY, relieve OWNER of its legal duty to perform said obligations under this Development
Agreement with respect to the Property or portion thereof, so transferred, except to the extent
OWNER is not in default under the terms of this Development Agreement.
28.2 Release Upon Transfer. It is understood and agreed by the parties that the Property
may be subdivided following the Development Agreement Date. One or more of such
subdivided parcels may be sold, mortgaged, hypothecated, assigned or transferred to persons for
development by them in accordance with the provisions of this Development Agreement.
Effective upon such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer, the obligations of
OWNER shall become several and not joint, except as to OWNER’s obligations set forth in
Section 9 of this Development Agreement. Upon the sale, transfer, or assignment of OWNER's
rights and interests under this Development Agreement as permitted pursuant to the Section 28.1
above, OWNER shall be released from its obligations under this Development Agreement with
respect to the Property, or portion thereof so transferred, provided that (a) OWNER is not then in
default under this Development Agreement, (b) OWNER has provided to CITY the notice of
such transfer specified in Section 28.1 above, (c) the transferee executes and delivers to CITY a
written agreement in which (i) the name and address of the transferee is set forth and (ii) the
transferee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the obligations of OWNER under this
Development Agreement and the Development Approvals with respect to the property, or portion
thereof, so transferred and (d) the transferee provides CITY with security equivalent to any
security provided by OWNER to secure performance of its obligations under this Development
Agreement or the Development Approvals. Non-compliance by any such transferee with the
terms and conditions of this Development Agreement shall not be deemed a default hereunder or
grounds for termination hereof or constitute cause for CITY to initiate enforcement action against
other persons then owning or holding interest in the Property or any portion thereof and not
themselves in default hereunder. Upon completion of any phase of development of the Project as
determined by CITY, CITY may release that completed phase from any further obligations under
this Development Agreement. The provisions of this Section shall be self-executing and shall
not require the execution or recordation of any further document or instrument. Any and all
successors, assigns and transferees of OWNER shall have all of the same rights, benefits and
obligations of OWNER as used in this Development Agreement and the term "OWNER" as used
in this Development Agreement shall refer to any such successors, assigns and transferees unless
expressly provided herein to the contrary.
Section 29. NO CONFLICTING ENACTMENTS.
26
By entering into this Development Agreement and relying thereupon, OWNER is
obtaining vested rights to proceed with the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions
of this Development Agreement, and in accordance with, and to the extent of, the Development
Approvals. By entering into this Development Agreement and relying thereupon, CITY is
securing certain public benefits which enhance the public health, safety and general welfare.
CITY therefore agrees that except as provided in Section 23 of this Development Agreement,
neither the City Council nor any other agency of CITY shall enact a rule, regulation, ordinance or
other measure which relates to the rate, timing or sequencing of the Development or construction
of all or any part of the Project and which is inconsistent or in conflict with this Development
Agreement.
Section 30. GENERAL.
30.1 Force Majeure. The Term of this Development Agreement and the time within
which OWNER shall be required to perform any act under this Development Agreement shall be
extended by a period of time equal to the number of days during which performance of such act
is delayed unavoidably by strikes, lock-outs, Acts of God, failure or inability to secure materials
or labor by reason of priority or similar regulations or order of any governmental or regulatory
body, initiative or referenda, moratoria, enemy action, civil disturbances, fire, unavoidable
casualties, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of OWNER.
30.2 Construction of Development Agreement. The language in all parts of this
Development Agreement shall in all cases, be construed as a whole and in accordance with its
fair meaning. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Development Agreement
are for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of
constructions. This Development Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
California. The parties understand and agree that this Development Agreement is not intended to
constitute, nor shall be construed to constitute, an impermissible attempt to contract away the
legislative and governmental functions of CITY, and in particular, the CITY’s police powers. In
this regard, the parties understand and agree that this Development Agreement shall not be
deemed to constitute the surrender or abnegation of the CITY’s governmental powers over the
Property.
30.3 Severability. If any provision of this Development Agreement shall be adjudged to
be invalid, void or unenforceable, such provision shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any
other provision hereof, unless such judgment affects a material part of this Development
Agreement, the parties hereby agree that they would have entered into the remaining portions of
this Development Agreement not adjudged to be invalid, void or illegal. In the event that all or
any portion of this Development Agreement is found to be unenforceable, this Development
Agreement or that portion which is found to be unenforceable shall be deemed to be a statement
of intention by the parties; and the parties further agree that in such event they shall take all steps
necessary to comply with such public hearings and/or notice requirements as may be necessary in
order to make valid this Development Agreement or that portion which is found to be
unenforceable. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Development Agreement, in the
27
event that any material provision of this Development Agreement is found to be unenforceable,
void or voidable, OWNER or CITY may terminate this Development Agreement in accordance
with the provisions of the Development Agreement Statute and the Procedures Resolution.
30.4 Cumulative Remedies. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may
institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, to enforce any covenant or agreement
herein, or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation, including suits for declaratory relief,
specific performance, relief in the nature of mandamus and actions for damages. All of the
remedies described above shall be cumulative and not exclusive of one another, and the exercise
of any one or more of the remedies shall not constitute a waiver or election with respect to any
other available remedy.
30.5 Hold Harmless Agreement. OWNER and CITY hereby mutually agree to, and shall
hold each other, each other's elective and appointive councils, boards, commissions, officers,
partners, agents, representatives and employees harmless from any liability for damage or claims
for damage for personal injury, including death, and from claims for property damage which may
arise from the activities of the other's or the other's contractors', subcontractors', agents’, or
employees' which relate to the Project whether such activities be by OWNER or CITY, or by any
of the OWNER’s or the CITY’s contractors, subcontractors, or by any one or more persons
indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for OWNER any of the OWNER's or the CITY's
contractors or subcontractors. OWNER and CITY agree to and shall defend the other and the
other's elective and appointive councils, boards, commissioners, officers, partners, agents,
representatives and employees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for damage caused or
alleged to have been caused by reason of the aforementioned activities which relate to the
Project.
30.6 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge. In the event of any legal action
instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the validity of any
provision of this Development Agreement and/or the Development Approvals, the parties hereby
agree to cooperate fully with each other in defending said action and the validity of each
provision of this Development Agreement, however, OWNER shall be liable for all legal
expenses and costs incurred in defending any such action. OWNER shall be entitled to choose
legal counsel to defend against any such legal action and shall pay any attorneys' fees awarded
against CITY or OWNER, or both, resulting from any such legal action. OWNER shall be
entitled to any award of attorneys' fees arising out of any such legal action.
30.7 Public Agency Coordination. CITY and OWNER shall cooperate and use their
respective best efforts in coordinating the implementation of the Development Approvals with
other public agencies, if any, having jurisdiction over the Property or the Project.
30.8 Initiative Measures. Both CITY and OWNER intend that this Development
Agreement is a legally binding contract which will supersede any initiative, measure,
moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation (whether relating to the rate,
timing or sequencing of the Development or construction of all or any part of the Project and
28
whether enacted by initiative or otherwise) affecting parcel or subdivision maps (whether
tentative, vesting tentative or final), building permits, occupancy certificates or other entitlements
to use approved, issued or granted within the CITY, or portions of the CITY, and which
Agreement shall apply to the Project to the extent such initiative, measure, moratorium,
referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation is inconsistent or in conflict with this
Development Agreement. Should an initiative, measure, moratorium, referendum, statute,
ordinance, or other limitation be enacted by the citizens of CITY which would preclude
construction of all or any part of the Project, and to the extent such initiative, measure,
moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation be determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to invalidate or prevail over all or any part of this Development
Agreement, OWNER shall have no recourse against CITY pursuant to the Development
Agreement, but shall retain all other rights, claims and causes of action under this Development
Agreement not so invalidated and any and all other rights, claims and causes of action as law or
in equity which OWNER may have independent of this Development Agreement with respect to
the project. The foregoing shall not be deemed to limit OWNER's right to appeal any such
determination that such initiative, measure, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation
invalidates or prevails over all or any part of this Development Agreement. CITY agrees to
cooperate with OWNER in all reasonable manners in order to keep this Development Agreement
in full force and effect, provided OWNER shall reimburse CITY for its out-of-pocket expenses
incurred directly in connection with such cooperation and CITY shall not be obligated to institute
a lawsuit or other court proceedings in this connection.
30.9 Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any dispute between the parties involving the
covenants or conditions contained in this Development Agreement, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover reasonable expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs.
30.10 No Waiver. No delay or omission by either party in exercising any right or power
accruing upon non-compliance or failure to perform by the other party under any of the
provisions of this Development Agreement shall impair any such right or power or be construed
to be a waiver thereof. A waiver by either party of any of the covenants or conditions to be
performed by the other party shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of non-
performance of the same or other covenants and conditions hereof.
30.11 Authority to Execute. The person executing this Development Agreement on
behalf of OWNER warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this
Development Agreement on behalf of his/her partnership and represents that he/she has the
authority to bind OWNER to the performance of OWNER's obligations hereunder.
30.12 Notice.
30.12.1 To OWNER. Any notice required or permitted to be given by CITY to OWNER
under or pursuant to this Development Agreement shall be deemed sufficiently given if in writing
and delivered personally to an officer of OWNER or mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid,
registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed; to OWNER as follows:
29
Shopoff Advisors, L.P.
c/o The Shopoff Group, L.P
2 Park Plaza, Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92614
Attn: William A. Shopoff
With a copy to:
Jackson DeMarco Tidus Peckenpaugh
2030 Main Street, 12th Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Attn: Gregory P. Powers, Esq.
or such changed address as OWNER shall designate in writing to CITY.
30.12.2 To CITY. Any notice required or permitted to be given to CITY under or
pursuant to this Development Agreement shall be made and given in writing, if by mail
addressed to:
City Council
City of Anaheim
c/o City Clerk
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
With copies to:
City Manager
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd FloorAnaheim, California 92805
City Attorney
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
or such changed address as CITY shall designate in writing to OWNER.
Alternatively, notices to CITY may also be personally delivered to the City Clerk, at the
Anaheim Civic Center, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor, Anaheim, California, together with
copies marked for the City Manager and the City Attorney or, if so addressed and mailed, with
postage thereon fully prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City
Council in care of the City Clerk at the above address with copies likewise so mailed to the City
30
Manager and the City Attorney, respectively and also in care of the City Clerk at the same
address. The provisions of this Section shall be deemed permissive only and shall not detract
from the validity of any notice given in a manner which would be legally effective in the absence
of this Section.
30.13 Captions. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Development
Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall in no way define, explain, modify,
construe, limit, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of any of the
provisions of this Development Agreement.
30.14 Consent. Any consent required by the parties in carrying out the terms of this
Development Agreement shall not unreasonably be withheld.
30.15 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and
provide reasonable to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all
obligations under this Development Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this
Development Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall
promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record
such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary
under the terms of this Development Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the
provisions of this Development Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Development Agreement.
30.16 Subsequent Amendment to Authorizing Statute. This Development Agreement
has been entered into in reliance upon the provisions of the Development Agreement Statute in
effect as of the Development Agreement Date. Accordingly, subject to Section 23.1 above, to
the extent that subsequent amendments to the Government Code would affect the provisions of
this Development Agreement, such amendments shall not be applicable to this Development
Agreement unless necessary for this Development Agreement to be enforceable or unless this
Development Agreement is modified pursuant to the provisions set forth in this Development
Agreement and Government Code Section 65868 as in effect on the Development Agreement
Date.
30.17 Governing Law. This Development Agreement, including, without limitation, its
existence, validity, construction and operation, and the rights of each of the parties shall be
determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
30.18 Effect on Title. OWNER and CITY agree that this Development Agreement shall
not continue as an encumbrance against any portion of the Property as to which this
Development Agreement has terminated.
30.19 Mortgagee Protection. Entering into or a breach of this Development Agreement
shall not defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of Mortgagees having a mortgage on
any portion of the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law.
31
No Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Development Agreement to perform
OWNER's obligations, or to guarantee such performance prior to any foreclosure or deed in lieu
thereof.
30.20 Notice of Default to Mortgagee, Right of Mortgagee to Cure. If the City Clerk
timely receives notice from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to
OWNER under the terms of this Development Agreement, CITY shall provide a copy of that
notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The
Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, for a period up to ninety (90) days after the
receipt of such notice from CITY to cure or remedy, or to commence to cure or remedy the
default unless a further extension of time to cure is granted in writing by CITY. If the default is
of a nature which can only be remedied or cured by such Mortgagee upon obtaining possession,
such Mortgagee shall seek to obtain possession with diligence and continually through
foreclosure, a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure the default or
non-compliance within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or
non-compliance cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period,
then such Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to remedy
or cure such default or non-compliance if such Mortgagee commences cure during such thirty
(30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such cure.
30.21 Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of Section 30.20 of this
Development Agreement, if any Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or pursues and
prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof by any process or
injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any
bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving CITY, the times specified in this Section for
commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other proceedings shall be extended for the period of
the prohibition.
30.22 Disaffirmance.
30.22.1 CITY agrees that in the event of termination of this Development Agreement by
reason of any default by CITY, or by reason of the disaffirmance hereof by a receiver, liquidator
or trustee for OWNER or its property, CITY, if requested by any Mortgagee, shall enter into a
new Development Agreement for the Project with the most senior Mortgagee requesting such
new agreement, for the remainder of the Term, effective as of the date of such termination, upon
the terms, provisions, covenants and agreements as herein contained to the extent and subject to
the law then in effect, and subject to the rights, if any, of any parties then in possession of any
part of the Property, provided:
30.22.2 The Mortgagee shall make written request upon CITY for the new Development
Agreement for the Project within thirty (30) days after the date of termination;
32
30.22.3 The Mortgagee shall pay to CITY at the time of the execution and delivery of the
new Development Agreement for the Project expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, to
which CITY shall have been subjected by reason of OWNER’s default; and
30.22.4 The Mortgagee shall perform and observe all covenants herein contained on
OWNER's part to be performed, and shall further remedy any other conditions which OWNER
under the terminated agreement was obligated to perform under its terms, to the extent the same
are curable or may be performed by the Mortgagee.
30.22.5 Nothing herein contained shall require any Mortgagee to enter into a new
agreement pursuant to Section 30.22.1 above, nor to cure any default of OWNER referred to
above.
30.23 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Development Agreement and all provisions
hereof is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of CITY, OWNER and their
successors and assigns. No other person shall have right of action based upon any provision in
this Development Agreement.
30.24 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and
between the parties hereto that the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as
the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting
entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Development
Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this
Development Agreement. The only relationship between CITY and OWNER is that of a
government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such private
property.
30.25 Restrictions. Property OWNER shall place in any agreements to sell or convey
any interest in the Property or any portion thereof, provisions making the terms of this
Development Agreement binding on any successors in interest of OWNER and express provision
for OWNER or CITY, acting separately or jointly, to enforce the provisions of this Development
Agreement and to recover attorneys' fees and costs for such enforcement.
30.26 Recitals. The recitals in this Development Agreement constitute part of this
Development Agreement and each party shall be entitled to rely on the truth and accuracy of each
recital as an inducement to enter into this Development Agreement.
30.27 Recording. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Development Agreement to
be executed by CITY and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County no later than ten
(10) days after CITY approves this Development Agreement.
30.28 Title Report. CITY is required to sign this Development Agreement only after
OWNER has provided CITY with a satisfactory preliminary title report evidencing and showing
OWNER’s legal and equitable ownership interest in the Property, current within six (6) months,
33
unencumbered except for the exceptions (hereinafter the “Permitted Exceptions”) set in the
preliminary title report for the Property dated May 24, 2007, attached hereto as Exhibit F (the
"Preliminary Title Report"). Any instrument of monetary encumbrance such as a deed of trust or
a mortgage entered into subsequent to the date of the Preliminary Title Report and prior to the
Development Agreement Date, shall contain language expressly subordinating such instruments
of monetary encumbrance to the provisions of this Development Agreement. OWNER shall
present evidence, satisfactory to CITY, of OWNER’s legal title to Property, subject only to the
Permitted Exceptions and any such subordinated instruments of monetary encumbrance, at the
time of recordation of this Development Agreement, or a memorandum thereof.
30.29 Entire Agreement. This Development Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Development Agreement, and this
Development Agreement supersedes all previous negotiations, discussions and agreements
between the parties, and no parol evidence of any prior or other agreement shall be permitted to
contradict or vary the terms hereof.
30.30 Successors and Assigns. The burdens of the Development Agreement shall be
binding upon, and the benefits of the Development Agreement inure to all successors in interest
and assigns of the parties to the Development Agreement.
30.31 OWNER's Title of Property. Neither party hereto shall be bound by any provision
of this Development Agreement unless and until OWNER shall record this Development
Agreement or a memorandum thereof, in the office of the County Recorder of the County
sufficient to cause this Development Agreement and the obligations contained herein to attach to
and encumber OWNER’s fee title to Property.
30.32 Exhibits. All exhibits, including attachments thereto, are incorporated in this
Development Agreement in their entirety by this reference.
[Remainder of page intentionally left blank; signatures on next page.]
34
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and OWNER have executed this Development
Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
“CITY” “OWNER”
CITY OF ANAHEIM, a SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P., a Delaware
municipal corporation limited partnership
By: The Shopoff Corporation, a Delaware
corporation, its general partner
By: ____________________ By: ____________________________
Mayor William A. Shopoff,
President & Chief Executive
Officer
ATTEST:
________________________
Linda N. Andal
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
Theodore J. Reynolds
Assistant City Attorney
92308.3
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL NO. 1:
PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42
INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
[Assessor's Parcel No. 082-261-27]
PARCEL NO. 2:
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42
INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF
ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
[Assessor's Parcel No. 082-261-28]
EXHIBIT “B”
FINAL SITE PLAN
List of Exhibits for The Platinum Vista Project
Exhibit No.
Rendering of Connector Street
Tentative Tract Map
A1 Title Sheet
A1.0 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A1.2 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A2 Site Plan Conceptual Site Plan
A2.1 Site Plan - Conceptual Fire Plan
A3 Trash Plan - Conceptual Trash Plan
A4.1 Building Plan – Subterranean Level/First Floor Plan
A4.2 Building Plan – Second Floor Plan/Third Floor Plan
A 4.3 Building Plan – Fourth Floor Plan/Fifth Floor Plan
A4.4 Building Plan – Six Level Garage Plan
A4.5 Building Plan - Seventh Level Garage/Roof Plan
A5.1 Elevation – South Elevation (Katella Avenue),West Elevation (Connector Street)
A5.2 Elevations – North Elevation, East Elevation
A6 Site Sections –Section A, Section B
A7.1 Floor Plans – Conceptual One Bedroom Unit Plans
A7.2 Floor Plans – Conceptual Two and Three Bedroom Unit Plans
L1 Overall Schematic Landscape Plan (Katella Avenue)
L2 Leasing Center Schematic Landscape Plan
L3 Recreation Area Schematic Landscape Plan
L4 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Patio)
L5 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Lounge)
L6 Design Support Images
L7 Schematic Lighting Plan – Katella Avenue
Material and Color Legend
Final Site Plan
List of Exhibits for The Platinum Vista Project
Exhibit No.
Rendering of Connector Street
Tentative Tract Map
A1 Title Sheet
A1.0 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A1.2 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A2 Site Plan Conceptual Site Plan
A2.1 Site Plan - Conceptual Fire Plan
A3 Trash Plan - Conceptual Trash Plan
A4.1 Building Plan – Subterranean Level/First Floor Plan
A4.2 Building Plan – Second Floor Plan/Third Floor Plan
A 4.3 Building Plan – Fourth Floor Plan/Fifth Floor Plan
A4.4 Building Plan – Six Level Garage Plan
A4.5 Building Plan - Seventh Level Garage/Roof Plan
A5.1 Elevation – South Elevation (Katella Avenue),West Elevation (Connector Street)
A5.2 Elevations – North Elevation, East Elevation
A6 Site Sections –Section A, Section B
A7.1 Floor Plans – Conceptual One Bedroom Unit Plans
A7.2 Floor Plans – Conceptual Two and Three Bedroom Unit Plans
L1 Overall Schematic Landscape Plan (Katella Avenue)
L2 Leasing Center Schematic Landscape Plan
L3 Recreation Area Schematic Landscape Plan
L4 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Patio)
L5 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Lounge)
L6 Design Support Images
L7 Schematic Lighting Plan – Katella Avenue
Material and Color Legend
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.CITY OF ANAHEIMPLATINUM GATEWAY ANDPLATINUM VISTA 17494
EXHIBIT “C”
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
NOTE: Mitigation Measures (“MM”), from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 306 are
incorporated into these conditions of approval and are identified by the mitigation
measure number below applicable condition numbers.
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED
OFF BY
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT OR DEMOLITION PERMITS
1
(MM2-3)
Prior to approval of each grading plan (for
Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit Demolition
and Import/Export Plans detailing construction
and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste
reduction measures to be implemented to recover
C&D materials. These plans shall include
identification of off-site locations for materials
export from the project and options for disposal of
excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent site,
sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project
in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally
cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it
within Orange County. The property
owner/developer shall offer recyclable building
materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or
removal by private firms or public agencies for use
in construction of other projects if not all can be
reused at the project site.
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
2 Prior to issuance of the grading permit and right-of-
way construction permit for the storm drain and
sewer, whichever occurs first, a Save Harmless
agreement in-lieu of an Encroachment Agreement is
required to be executed, approved by the City and
recorded by the applicant on the property for any
storm drains connecting to a City storm drain.
Development
Services
3
(MM 3-2)
At least 90 days prior to the initiation of grading
activities, for projects greater than one acre,
coverage for the project must be obtained by
electronically submitting permit registration
documents to the State or obtaining coverage via
Building Division
current general construction permit prescribed
method by the property owner/developer pursuant
to State and Federal National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As
part of the NOI, a Surface Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The
property owner/developer shall also prepare and
submit to the Development Services Division of
the Public Works Department, a Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with
the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and
Chapter 7 of the Orange County Drainage Area
Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved
prior to issuance of grading permit. The SWPPP,
in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the
structural and nonstructural BMPs that will be
implemented during construction (short-term)
within the Project Area as well as BMPs for long-
term operation of the Project Area that address
potential impacts to surface waters.
4
(MM10-1)
The City Engineer shall review the location of
each project to determine if it is located within an
area served by deficient sewer facilities, as
identified in the latest updated sewer study for the
Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase
sewer flows beyond those programmed in the
appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or
if the project currently discharges to an existing
deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency
in an existing sewer line, the property
owner/developer shall be required to guarantee
mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the
area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
City Attorney’s Office. Prior to issuance of a
grading permit the sewer plans shall be submitted
for review. Prior to issuance of a building permit
for each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer
study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the project area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
Development
Services
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
thereof.
5
(MM10-3)
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each
development project, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall contact Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding
sewer capacity. Additionally, if requested by the
OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place
up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a
month to verify capacity and ensure consistency
with the OCSD’s modeling results.
Development
Services
6 Prior to the issuance of the first grading permit, the
OWNER shall demonstrate that coverage has been
obtained under California’s General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with
Construction Activity by providing a copy of the
Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water
Resources Control Board and a copy of the
subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste
Discharge Identification (WDID) number. The
owner shall prepare and implement a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the
current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and
be available for City review on request.
Development
Services
7
(MM10-8)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit,
the property owner/developer shall provide
engineering studies, including network analysis, to
size the water mains for ultimate development
within the project. This includes detailed water
usage analysis and building plans for Public
Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval
in determining project water requirements and
appropriate water assessment fees.
Water Engineering
Division
8
(MM10-9)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation meter when the
total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet.
(City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
Water Engineering
9 The property owner shall comply with Rule 15D Water Engineering
of the Water Utilities Rates, Rules, and
Regulations and pay all applicable water
assessment fees.
10
(MM10-13)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans water
efficient design features including, but not limited
to (as applicable to the type of development at
issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals,
automatic on and off water faucets, and water
efficient appliances.
Resource Efficiency
11
(MM10-14)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation lines and use
recycled water when it becomes available. All
irrigation systems shall be designed so that they
will function properly with recycled water. The
property owner/developer shall contact the Public
Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division,
for recycled water system requirements and
specific water conservation measures to be
incorporated into the building and landscape
construction plans.
Water Engineering
12
(MM10-17)
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall
review the location of each project to determine if
it is located within an area served by deficient
drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan
of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove
Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the project
will increase stormwater flows beyond those
programmed in the appropriate master plan
drainage study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient storm
drain system or will create a deficiency in an
existing storm drain, the property owner/developer
shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the
impact to adequately serve the area to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer
shall be required to install the drainage facilities,
as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the
Development
Services
impacts of the proposed development based upon
the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones
of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East
Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary
Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of
public improvements by the City or final Building
and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure,
whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property
owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
thereof.
13 Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the property
owner shall submit a final drainage report and
project improvement plans that incorporate the
required drainage improvements and the
mechanisms proposed in the Drainage Report. No
offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after
grading operations or perimeter wall construction.
Development
Services
14 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property
owner/developer shall submit plans documenting
that the design of all aboveground structures (with
the exception of parking structures) shall be at
least one foot higher that the 100-year flood zone,
where applicable, unless otherwise required by the
City Engineer. All structures below this level shall
be floodproofed to prevent damage to property or
harm to people.
Development
Services
15
(MM 10-20)
Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for
import/export plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for demolition plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit a
Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if
determined to be necessary by the Public Works
Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or
Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall
include identification of off-site locations for
material export from the project and options for
disposal of excess material. These options may
include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a
broker or contractor, sale to a project in the
vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared
Streets and Sanitation
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
landfill, with attempts made to move it within
Orange County. The property owner/developer
shall offer recyclable building materials, such as
asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private
firms or public agencies for use in construction of
other projects, if all cannot be reused on the
project site.
16
(MM10-23)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Relocate Southern California Edison
transmission line underground on
Katella Avenue from west of the Union
Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850
feet).
• Relocate Southern California Edison
communication line underground on
Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to
east of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet
west of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• Relocate distribution circuits
underground on Katella Avenue from
Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State
College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim
Way to State College Boulevard (1,500
feet).
Electrical
Engineering
• Relocation a distribution circuit
underground on Orangewood Avenue
from State College Boulevard to west of
the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Lewis
Street from Katella Avenue to Gene
Autry Way (950 feet).
• Relocate a distribution circuit
underground on Douglas Street from
Katella Avenue to Cerritos Avenue
(1,000 feet).
17
(MM10-25)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Two new distribution duct banks on
Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to
Lewis Street (800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell
Avenue (2,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on State
College Boulevard from Cerritos
Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Electrical
Engineering
Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the
Santa Ana River (4,800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from Haster Street to the east
side of I-5 (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new tra nsmission duct bank on
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,400 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Lewis
Street and Santa Cruz Street from
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on the east
side of the Angel Stadium parking lot
from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57
(2,000 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road
from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue (4,000 feet).
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
18
(MM2-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence that high-solids or water-based low
emissions paints and coatings are utilized in the
design and construction of buildings, in
compliance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s regulations. This
information shall be denoted on the project plans
and specifications. Additionally, the property
owner/developer’s shall specify the use of high-
volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand
application. Air-atomized spray techniques shall
not be permitted. Plans shall also show that
property owner/developers shall construct/build
with materials that do not require painting, or use
prepainted construction materials, to the extent
feasible.
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
19
(MM2-6)
The property owner/architect shall submit energy
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with
the performance approach to the California Energy
Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that
Building Division
shows each new structure exceeds the applicable
Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a
minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building
permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as
vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof
temperatures significantly during the
summer and; therefore, reduce the energy
requirement for air conditioning. Examples
of energy efficient building materials and
suppliers can be found at the following
website: http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or
other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-
colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous
pavement, for all roadways and walkways
not within the public right-of-way, to
minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its
surrounding environment. Examples of
cool pavement materials are available at:
http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html
or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the
existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy
efficient appliances (e.g., EnergyStar®
appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering
window coatings or double-paned
windows.
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all
commercial structures encompassing over
50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within
close proximity to the building structure to
reduce heat load and resulting energy usage
at residential, commercial, and office.
20
(MM5-1)
Prior to approval of street improvement plans for
any project-related roadway widening, the City
shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design
Development
Services
project acoustical features that will limit traffic
noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are
below the City’s noise ordinance. These treatments
shall be noted on the street improvement plans to
the satisfaction of the Planning Department and
may include, but are not limited to, the
replacement of windows and doors at existing
residences with acoustically rated windows and
doors.
Building Division
21
(MM5-2)
The project property owner/developers shall
submit a final acoustical report prepared to the
satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report
shall show that the development will be sound-
attenuated against present and projected noise
levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter,
stationary sources (e.g., industrial, commercial,
stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior
noise standards as follows:
a) The report shall demonstrate that the
proposed residential design will result in
compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior
noise levels, as required by the California
Building Code and California Noise
Insulation Standards (Title 24 and 25 of the
California Code of Regulations).
b) The report shall demonstrate that the
Proposed Project residential design shall
minimize nighttime awakening from
stadium event noise and train horns such
that interior single-event noise levels are
below 81 dBA Lmax.
The property owner/developer shall submit the
noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for
review and approval. Upon approval by the City,
the project acoustical design features shall be
incorporated into construction of the Proposed
Project.
Building Division
22
(MM5-5)
To reduce noise and vibration impacts from the
impact pile driver, the construction contractor shall
evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast piles or
a similar system to drill holes to construct cast-in-
place piles for a pile-supported transfer slab
foundation system. This alternative construction
method would reduce the duration necessary for
Building Division
use of the impact pile driver and/or eliminate the
need to use pile drivers altogether. Proof of
compliance with this measure shall be submitted
to the Planning Department in the form of a letter
from the construction contractor.
23
(MM7-1)
Plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have
fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim
Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed
by the property owner/developer prior to each final
Building and Zoning inspection.
Fire Department
24
(MM7-2)
The property owner/developer shall pay the Public
Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time,
for fire facilities and equipment impact fees
identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter
17.36.
Fire Department
25
(MM7-3)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
to the Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval for the purpose of incorporating safety
measures in the project design including
implementation of Ordinance 6016 and the concept
of crime prevention through environmental design
(i.e., building design, circulation, site planning and
lighting of parking structure and parking areas).
Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking
structures (for the police helicopter). Minimum
size for numbers shall be four feet in height and
two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall
be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches
apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to
the parking structure and shall face the street to
which the structure is addressed.
Police Department
26
(MM7-4)
For a parking structure, the property
owner/developer shall submit plans to the
Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval indicating the provision of closed circuit
monitoring and recording or other substitute
security measures as may be approved by the
Anaheim Police Department. Said measures shall
be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning
inspections.
Police Department
27
(MM7-5)
The property owner/developer shall submit design
plans that shall include parking lots and parking
Police Department
structures with controlled access points to limit
ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by
the Anaheim Police Department, and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim
Police Department.
28
(MM7-9)
The property owner/developer shall pay the school
impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of
the Anaheim Union High School District and
Anaheim City School District in compliance with
Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section
65995 [b][3] as amended).
Community
Development
Building Division
29
(MM9-4)
The property owner/developer shall pay the
appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees,
Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
Traffic and
Transportation
30
(MM9-5)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan.
Traffic and
Transportation
31
(MM 9-6)
Any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak
hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic
Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property
owner/developers shall prepare traffic
improvement phasing analyses to identify when
the improvements identified in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic
Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010
(Appendix F of this SEIR) shall be designed and
constructed. The Development Agreement
Conditions of Approval shall require the property
Traffic and
Transportation
owner/developer to implement traffic
improvements as identified in the project traffic
study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as
defined by the City’s General Plan, based on
thresholds of significance, performance standards
and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339,
Orange County Congestion Management Program
and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study
Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses
will specify the timing, funding, construction and
fair share responsibilities for all traffic
improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory
levels of service within the City of Anaheim and
surrounding jurisdictions. The Development
Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require
the property owner/developer to construct, bond
for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary
circulation system improvements, as determined
by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager,
unless alternative funding sources have been
identified.
32
(MM9-7)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners
/developers will analyze to determine when the
intersection improvements shall be constructed,
subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation
Measure 9-6 of Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
106C.
The improvement phasing analyses will specify
the timing, funding, construction and fair-share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements
necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service
within the City of Anaheim and surrounding
jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-share calculations
shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-
way, a nd construction costs, unless alternative
funding sources have been identified to help pay
for the improvement.
The Development Agreement Conditions of
Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter
into a funding agreement for necessary circulation
system improvements, as determined by the City
Traffic and
Transportation
Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless
alternative funding sources have been identified.
33
(MM9-8)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions
shall be taken in cooperation with the City of
Orange:
a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis
shall identify any impacts created by the
project on facilities within the City of
Orange. The fair-share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
shall be calculated in this analysis.
b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost
of the project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with the City of Orange.
c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of
Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City of
Anaheim shall hold the amount received in
trust, and then, once a mutually agreed
upon joint program is executed by both
cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate
the fair-share contribution to traffic
mitigation programs that result in improved
traffic flow at the impacted locations, via
an agreement mutually acceptable to both
cities.
d) The City shall work with the City of
Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure the
fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial
and intersection impacts in the City of
Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible.
Traffic and
Transportation
34
(MM9-9)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a
regional transportation agency has not already
programmed and funded the warranted
improvements to the impacted freeway mainline or
freeway ramp locations, property
owners/developers and the City will take the
following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s
Traffic and
Transportation
proportionate impact on the specific
freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp
locations and its fair share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
based on thresholds of significance,
performance standards and methodologies
utilized in SEIR No. 339 and established in
the Orange County Congestion
Management Program and City of Anaheim
Traffic Study Guidelines.
b) The City shall estimate the cost of the
project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
35
(MM9-10)
Prior to the approval of a building permit the
property owner/developer shall pay the identified
fair-share responsibility as determined by the City
as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow on the
impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City.
Traffic and
Transportation
36
(MM9-11)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of
impacts generated by the project.
Traffic and
Transportation
37
(MM9-14)
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for
each building, the property owner/developer shall
pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment
Fees, Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
Traffic and
Transportation
Division
which have been established.
38
(MM9-15)
The property owner/developer shall meet with the
Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine
whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed
adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is
required, it shall be placed in a location that least
impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the
Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the
approval of the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA).
Traffic and
Transportation
Orange County
Transportation
Authority (OCTA)
39
(MM10-4)
Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for
each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade
structures of the proposed development based upon
the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum
Triangle. Where requested by the City Engineer,
sewer improvements shall be constructed with
larger than recommended diameter to maintain the
surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert
elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above
the hydraulic grade line elevation of the surcharge
levels when they are above the pipe crown.
Development
Services
40
(MM10-6)
Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional
analysis shall be performed using flow, wet-weather
data, and other information specific for that project
in order to obtain more accurate results of the
surcharge levels for final design.
Development
Services
41
(MM10-7)
Landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance
with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape
Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in
compliance with the State of California Model
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the
project are the following:
• Use of water-conserving landscape plant
materials wherever feasible;
• Use of vacuums and other equipment to
reduce the use of water for wash down of
Resource Efficiency
Public Works,
Development
Services
exterior areas;
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment
including low flush toilets and urinals;
• Use of self-closing valves for drinking
fountains;
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as
drip irrigation and automatic systems
which use moisture sensors;
• Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and
urinals;
• Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at
night, when evaporation rates are lowest;
• Water-efficient dishwashers, clothes
washers, and other water using
appliances;
• Cooling tower recirculating system;
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in
irrigation system;
• Use of waterway recirculation systems;
• Provide information to the public in
conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
• Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and
washdown when it becomes available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and
building plans, the applicant shall identify which
of these measures have been incorporated into the
plans.
42
(MM 10-12)
Submitted landscape plans for all residential,
office and commercial landscaping shall
demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant
materials pursuant to the publication entitled
“Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by
the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000.
Resource Efficiency
43
(MM10-18)
The property owner/developer shall submit project
plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the
Public Works Department for review and approval
to ensure that the plans comply with AB939, and
the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the
County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated
Streets and Sanitation
Waste Management Plans as administered by the
City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan
shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain
in full effect as required by the Street and
Sanitation Division and may include, at its
discretion, the following plan components:
• Detailing the locations and design of on-
site recycling facilities.
• Participating in the City of Anaheim’s
“Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by
the City or governing agency.
• Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially
in retail areas) by providing adequate space
and centralized locations for collection and
bailing.
• Providing trash compactors for non-
recyclable materials whenever feasible to
reduce the total volume of solid waste and
number of trips required for collection.
• Providing on-site recycling receptacles
accessible to the public to encourage
recycling for all businesses, employees, and
patrons where feasible.
• Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies
with federal, state, and city regulations.
44
(MM 10-21)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
showing that each structure will exceed the State
Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential
Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California
Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent
and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public
Utilities Department Business and Community
Programs Division. This consultation shall take
place during project design in order to review Title
24 measures that are incorporated into the project
design energy efficient practices and allow
potential system alternatives such as thermal
energy storage air-conditioning, lighting, and
building envelope options. Plans submitted for
building permits shall show the proposed energy
efficiencies and systems alternatives.
Business and
Community
Programs
45
(MM 10-22)
The property owner/developer shall indicate on
plans energy-saving practices that will be
implemented with the project in compliance with
Title 24, which may include the following:
• High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS
(computer) control.
• Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.
• Outside air (100 percent) economizer
cycle.
• Staged compressors or variable speed
drives to flow varying thermal loads.
• Isolated HVAC zone control by
floors/separable activity areas.
• Specification of premium-efficiency
electric motors (i.e., compressor motors,
air-handling units, and fan-coil units).
• Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate
spaces.
• Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
• Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
• Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit
signage.
• Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts
where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
• Use of lighting power controllers in
association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity
discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots.
• Consideration of thermal energy storage air
conditioning for spaces or facilities that
may require air-conditioning during
summer, day-peak periods.
• Consideration for participation in
Advantage Services Programs such as:
o New construction design review, in
which the City cost-shares
engineering for up to $15,000 for
design of energy efficient buildings
and systems.
o New Construction – Cash
Business and
Community
Programs
incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per
kWh saved for each measure and up
to $200,000 per facility for efficiency
that exceed Title 24 requirements.
o Green Building Program – Offers
accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees
and free technical assistance.
• Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons
per flush [gpf] or less).
• Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0
gpf to 0.25 gpf).
• Use of weather-based irrigation controllers
for outdoor irrigation.
Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in
outdoor landscaping.
46
(MM 10-24)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
for review and approval which shall ensure that
buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency
Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24,
Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code)
by a minimum of 10 percent.
Business and
Community
Programs
47
(MM10-26)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, the property owner/developer shall
provide an electrical load analysis to the City of
Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD).
The analysis shall include a load schedule and
maximum electrical coincident demand. Should
the property owner/developer’s load analysis result
in a contributed load forecasted to exceed 20
MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the
electrical system currently serving the Platinum
Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction
of a new electrical substation within the Platinum
Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees for the electrical substation
will be assessed in accordance with the Electric
Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial
mechanism approved by the City design features.
Electrical
Engineering
48 The property owner/developer shall submit a plan
to the Water Engineering Division of the Public
Utilities Department showing the individual water
Water Engineering
service installations required to serve each
building, including locations of proposed large
meters with easements, small meters, and fire lines
with backflow devices. The plan shall
demonstrate that all backflow devices will be
located aboveground outside the street setback
area in a manner fully screened from all public
streets and in locations approved by the Public
Utilities Department and the Planning Department.
The plans shall also demonstrate that any existing
water services, fire lines, and backflow devices
conform to current Water Utility Standards and/or
existing water services and/or fire lines that are not
approved for continued use by Water Engineering
shall be upgraded to current standards, or
abandoned, if no longer needed, by the property
owner/developer.
49 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property
owner/developer shall pay his project’s
proportionate share of the cost to prepare the
Water Supply Assessment for the Platinum
Triangle SEIR No. 339.
Water Engineering
50 The Owner shall submit a water system master
plan, including hydraulic distribution network
analysis and estimates of the maximum required
fire flow rate and the maximum day and peak hour
water demands for the development to the Water
Engineering Division of the Public Utilities
Department for review and approval. The master
plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the
proposed on-site water system to meet the
project’s water demands and fire protection
requirements without reducing existing service
levels or impacting any existing water supply or
conveyance facilities. Any off-site water system
improvements required to serve the project shall
be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the
Water Utility Rates, Rules and Regulations.
Water Engineering
51
A water improvement plan shall be submitted to
the Water Engineering Division for approval and a
performance bond in the amount approved by the
City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney
shall be posted with the City of Anaheim
Water Engineering
52 All requests for new water services or fire lines, as
well as any modifications, relocations, or
abandonments of existing water services and fire
lines, shall be coordinated through Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Water Engineering
53 Prior to issuance of a building permit it the
following shall be determined:
1) No public water mains or public water
facilities shall be installed in any alleys or
paseos.
2) No water mains or laterals allowed under
parking stalls.
3) Separate services shall be installed for
domestic and fire water.
4) All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be
metered with a UL listed meter, Hershey
Residential Fire Meter with Translator
Register, no equals.
5) Large water meters shall be located on
private property in an easement, outside of
the setback area.
6) Lead-free backflow prevention assemblies
meeting the City of Anaheim’s current
standards shall be installed at all domestic
water service meters. Backflow prevention
assemblies meeting the City of Anaheim’s
current standards shall be installed at all
fire and irrigation services. Additionally,
the location and type of all meters and
backflow prevention assemblies shall be
subject to the review and approval of
Anaheim Water Engineering during the
final design stage.
7) Although the conceptual water system
layout is acceptable to Anaheim Water
Engineering, the final alignment and layout
shall be subject to the review and approval
of Anaheim Water Engineering during the
final design phase.
Water Engineering
54 Owner/developer shall acquire and provide an
easement to the City of Anaheim for all locations
where public water main crosses Orange County
Water Engineering
Flood Control District Right-of-Way and facilities
(both existing AND proposed flood facilities). The
City will cooperate and assist in the acquisition of
the easement.
55 The City’s grant easement deed language
requirements (i.e., City is ONLY responsible for
replacing asphalt paving when it makes repairs or
replacements to public water facilities in private
streets, it is NOT responsible for slurry sealing,
replacing concrete, pavers, or any other decorative
hardscape, walls, or landscaping) shall be included
in easement deeds for all public water facilities
located on private property.
Water Engineering
56 The applicant shall demonstrate to the City that
adequate water supply exists to serve the Proposed
Project. If it cannot be demonstrated that adequate
water exists to serve the specific project, the
project shall not be approved.
Water Engineering
57 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the
entrances of parking lots/structures and located in
other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’
x 1’ in overall size, with white background and
black 2” lettering.
Police Department
58 All entrances to parking areas should be posted
with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C. to
assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owner’s/manager’s request.
Police Department
59
The proposed project shall comply with all State
Energy Insulation Standards and City of Anaheim
codes in effect at the time of application for
building permits. (Commonly referred to as Title
24, these standards are updated periodically to
allow consideration and possible incorporation of
new energy efficiency technologies and methods.)
Electrical
Engineering
60 Prior to approval of permits for improvement
plans, the property owner/developer shall
coordinate with Electrical Engineering to
establish electrical service requirements and
submit electric system plans, electrical panel
drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and
Electrical
Engineering
related technical drawings and specifications.
61 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be
painted red to prohibit parallel parking in the drive
aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled
on building plans.
Transportation and
Traffic
62 That prior to issuance of building permits, plans
shall specifically indicate that all vehicular ramps
and grades conform to all applicable Engineering
Standards.
Traffic and
Transportation
63 That prior to issuance of the a building permit for
the parking structure, plans shall demonstrate that
at-grade ducts and overhead pipes shall not
encroach in the parking space areas or required
vehicle clearance areas.
Traffic and
Transportation
64 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
final map shall be submitted to and approved by the
City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and
the Orange County Surveyor for technical review
and that all applicable conditions of approval have
been complied with and then shall be filed in the
Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Development
Services
65 That prior to the issuance of the first building
permit, the property owner/developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the property
owner/developer of the Platinum Gateway project,
subject to the approval of the City Engineer, to
provide for cost sharing of the construction of the
public Connector Street between Lewis Street and
Katella Avenue.
Traffic and
Transportation
66 That prior to the approval of the final subdivision
map or issuance of a building permit, whichever
occurs first, the property owner/developer shall
pay the identified fair share responsibility as
determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation
Measures 9-7 and 9-8 of MMP 106C. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow, via an
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City. These improvements consist of any potential
mitigation measures identified in the updated
Traffic and
Transportation
traffic study.
67 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall submit to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division street improvement
plans for the work on Katella Avenue, collector
road street “A” and “B” including but not limited to
curb and gutter, sidewalk and landscape, storm
drain, and sewer facilities, and traffic signals as
applicable. The landscape and irrigation
improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance
with the Public Works Landscape and Irrigation
Manual for Public Street and Highway.
Development
Services
68 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall post a security to guarantee the construction
of public improvements, including storm drain,
water, electrical and sewer, in an amount approved
by the City Engineer and in a form approved by
the City Attorney. The improvements shall be
constructed and operational prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
Development
Services
69 The Public Park recreation amenities shall be
designed to the satisfaction of Community
Services Department and in substantial
conformance with Final Site Plan exhibits.
Community Services
ON-GOING DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION
70
(MM 2-1)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring contractors to implement the
following measures to reduce construction-related
emissions; however, the resultant value is expected
to remain significant.
a) The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained in accordance with
the manufacturer’s recommendations to
reduce operational emissions.
b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as
identified by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, off-road
construction equipment with higher air
pollutant emissions standards for
equipment greater than 50 horsepower,
based on manufacturer’s availability.
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
c) The contractor shall utilize existing power
sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel
generators rather than temporary diesel-
power generators, where feasible.
71
(MM 2-2)
The property owner/developer shall implement the
following measures in addition to the existing
requirements for fugitive dust control under South
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403
to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. To
assure compliance, the City shall verify
compliance that these measures have been
implemented during normal construction site
inspections. The measures to be implemented are
listed below:
a) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall re-establish ground cover on the
construction site through seeding and
watering as quickly as possible to achieve
minimum control efficiency for PM10 of 5
percent.
b) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall apply chemical soil stabilizers Pave to
on-site haul roads to achieve control
efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared
to travel on unpaved, untreated roads.
c) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall phase grading
to prevent the susceptibility of large areas
to erosion over extended periods of time.
d) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall schedule
activities to minimize the amount of
exposed excavated soil during and after the
end of work periods.
e) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall sweep streets with Rule
1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum
units on a daily basis if silt is carried over
to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs
as a result of hauling.
f) During active demolition and debris
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
removal and grading, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall suspend demolition and grading
operations when wind speeds exceed 25
miles per hour to achieve an emissions
control efficiency for PM10 under worst-
case wind conditions of 98 percent.
g) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-
inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand,
soil, or other loose materials and tarp
materials with a fabric cover or other
suitable means to achieve a control
efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent. an
h) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall water exposed ground
surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of
every three hours on the construction site to
achieve an emissions reduction control
efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.
i) During active demolition and debris
removal, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall apply water to
disturbed soils at the end of each day to
achieve an emission control efficiency for
PM10 of 10 percent.
j) During scraper unloading and loading, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall ensure that actively
disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil
moisture content of 12 percent by use of a
moveable sprinkler system or water truck
to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of
69 percent.
k) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds
on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles
per hour to achieve a control efficiency for
PM10 of 57 percent.
72
(MM5-7)
Ongoing during grading, demolition, and
construction, the property owner/developer shall
be responsible for requiring contractors to
Building Division
implement the following measures to limit
construction-related noise:
a) Noise generated by construction, shall be
limited by the property owner/developer to
60 dBA along the property boundaries,
before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as
governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure
Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment
that produces noise levels noticeably above
general construction noise levels to the
hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
All internal combustion engines on all of the
construction equipment shall be properly outfitted
with well maintained muffler systems.
Development
Services
73 Through specific study of this project site, by a
certified archaeologist, it has been determined that
no known cultural resources are located in this
area. However, should artifacts be uncovered
during grading or excavation, the developer shall
have a certified archaeologist ensure that the
following actions are implemented:
a) that the project shall be temporarily halted or
work redirected to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of artifacts if
potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If
artifacts are uncovered and determined to be
significant, the archaeological observer shall
determine appropriate actions in cooperation with
the City for exploration and/or salvage;
b) Specimens that are collected prior to or during
the grading process shall be donated to an
appropriate educational or research institution;
c) Any archaeological work at the project site shall
be conducted under the direction of the certified
archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered
during grading operations when the archaeological
observer is not present, grading shall be diverted
around the area until the observer can survey the
area; and
d) A final report detailing the findings and
disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to
Building Division
Development
Services
the City Engineer. Upon completion of the
grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as
to when the final report will be submitted
ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
74
(MM5-8)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to properly
maintain and tune all construction equipment to
minimize noise emissions.
Building Division
75
(MM5-9)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to locate all
stationary noise sources (e.g., generators,
compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied
noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible.
Building Division
76
(MM5-10)
Material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment
servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set
forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code,
Section 6.70.
Building Division
PRIOR TO APPROVAL AND ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION
77
(MM10-2)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass
area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are
making other improvements, the City and/or
property owner/developer shall coordinate with the
OCSD to ensure that all improvements and
construction schedules are coordinated.
Development
Services
78
(MM10-5)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans within
the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s)
where OCSD will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are
making other improvements, the City and/or
property owner shall coordinate with OCSD to
ensure that backflow prevention devices are
installed by OCSD at the lateral connections to
prevent surcharge flow from entering private
properties.
Streets and Sanitation
Orange
County Sanitation
District
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
79 In accordance with the timing required by the
(MM 2-5) Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later
than prior to the first final Building and Zoning
inspection, the property owner/developer shall
implement the following measures to reduce long-
term operational CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10
emissions:
• Traffic lane improvements and
signalization as outlined in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft
Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff,
August 2010 and Master Plan of Arterial
Highways (MPAH ) shall be implemented
as required by the Traffic and
Transportation Manager.
The property owner/contractor shall place bus
benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic
and Transportation Manager at locations along any
site frontage routes as needed.
Traffic and
Transportation
80
(MM 5-3)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during a stadium event will be provided
to all future tenants in the Stadium District.
Building Division
81
(MM 5-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during Stadium nearby venue events.
Building Division
82 A parking management plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the City Engineer prior to
the project receiving a certificate of occupancy.
Planning Division &
Traffic and
Transportation
83 That prior to final building and zoning inspection,
fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any
Time.” Said information shall be specifically
shown on plans submitted for building permits.
Traffic and
Transportation
84 In the event that the adjacent Platinum Gateway
project has not completed the following
improvement, the property owner/developer shall
construct the Connector Street as identified on the
Site Plan along the west property line prior to final
Traffic and
Transportation
building and zoning inspections. These
improvements shall include a cul-de-sac at the
north end of the Connector Street, or other turn
around area to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer, if it is expected that this project will be
in operation prior to the Platinum Gateway project.
85 That prior to City acceptance of the public right-
of-way improvements for Katella Avenue and for
the public Connector Street identified in the Final
Site Plan, said streets shall be posted with “No
Stopping Any Time” signs and associated red
curbs, except, in the locations where the
Connector Street is improved with designated
parking stalls and designated turn-out areas for
loading and unloading. Such signs shall be shown
on street improvement plans submitted by the
property owner/developer for the review and
approval by the Public Works Department. The
location of such signs shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Traffic Engineering
Manager. The property owner/developer shall be
responsible for all costs associated with the
installation of such signs.
Traffic and
Transportation
86 That prior to final building and zoning inspections,
the developer shall install accessible curb access
ramps with truncated domes at the intersection of
collector street “A” at the parking garage access,
in conformance with Public Works Standard
Detail 111-3.
Development
Services
87 Prior to release of posted securities, the public
improvements shall be constructed by the
developer and accepted by Construction Services
prior to final zoning and building inspections.
Development
Services
88 If required, prior to connection of electrical
service, the legal owner shall provide to the City
of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with
dimensions as shown on the approved utility
service plan.
Electrical
Engineering
89 That prior to final building and zoning inspections,
the developer shall improve the streets as follows:
1) improve Katella Avenue per the Platinum
Triangle Implementation Master Plan or as
approved by the City Engineer, 2) improve the
interior collector streets “A” per the Connector and
Collector Streets requirements of the Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan and the Platinum
Triangle Implementation Plan. Install a temporary
turn-around at the north terminus of Street “A” as
required by the City Engineer and the Fire
Department.
Development
Services
90 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal
owner shall submit payment to the City of
Anaheim for service connection fees.
Electrical
Engineering
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL
91 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for
Platinum Gateway and/or Platinum Vista, any
existing structures located within the ultimate
right-of-way for connector streets “A” and “B”,
Katella Avenue and Lewis Street shall be
demolished.
Development
Services
92 The vehicular access rights to Katella Avenue shall
be released and relinquished to the City of
Anaheim.
Development
Services
93 The vehicular access rights to connector public road
STREET “A” and STREET “B”, except at the
private street openings, shall be released and
relinquished to the City of Anaheim.
Development
Services
94 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably
offer for dedication (with subordination of
easements), including necessary construction
easements, 1) the ultimate arterial highway
right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property (Katella
Avenue) as shown in the Platinum Triangle
Implementation Plan or as approved by the City
Engineer, and 2) the ultimate right-of-way for the
interior collector streets “A” and “B” per the
Connector and Collector Streets requirements of
the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan,
Development
Services
regardless of the level of impacts generated by the
project.
95 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map,
in the event that the owner of Parcel 1 of Tentative
Tract 17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Gateway" project (APN 082-26-123 and
082-26-124), requires to construct Collector Street
“A” and/or “B” improvements, the property
owner/developer shall cooperate with “Platinum
Gateway” to grant temporary construction
easement(s) where necessary adjacent to Collector
Street “A” and/or “B” lying within the boundary of
Parcel 2 of Tentative Tract 17494.
Development
Services
96 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map,
in the event that the Parcel 1 of Tentative Tract
17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Gateway" project (APN 082-26-123 and
082-26-124), is not developed, the owner of Parcel
2 of Tentative Tract 17494 shall install a vehicular
turn-around area lying within the boundary of
Parcel 1 and Lot “A” of Tentative Tract 17494.
The geometry of the temporary turn-around shall
be reviewed and approved by City Engineer and
the Fire Department.
Development
Services
97 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the
Subdivision Section and approved by the City
Attorney's office. The covenant shall include
provisions for maintenance of private facilities such
as private sewer, concrete paver covered street
sections, private storm drain improvements,
temporary turn-around areas, if any, and backflow
prevention devices such as flap gates; compliance
with approved Water Quality Management Plan;
and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance
responsibilities shall include all drainage devices,
concrete pavers within the Connector public road,
sewer system, gates, parkway landscaping and
irrigation on Katella Avenue, collector public road
STREET “A” and STREET “B”, all lettered lots,
and any private street name signs. The covenant
shall be recorded concurrently with the final map.
Development
Services
98 The legal property owner shall execute a
Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the Development
City Attorney, to complete the required public
improvements at the legal property owner’s
expense. Said agreement shall be submitted to the
Public Works Department, Subdivision Section
approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. In
lieu of a Subdivision Agreement, an amended
Development Agreement can be utilized to satisfy
this condition of approval if the required terms are
included therein.
Services
99 The property owner/developer shall record an
easement for cul-de-sac driveway purposes on the
adjacent property to the immediate west if needed,
as approved by the City Engineer.
Traffic and
Transportation
GENERAL
100
(MM7-6)
Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim
Police Department of Anaheim Traffic
Management Center (TMC) personnel are required
to provide temporary traffic control services for the
project, the property owner/developer shall
reimburse the City, on a fair share basis, if
applicable, for reasonable costs associated with
such services
Police
Traffic Management
Development
Services
101
(MM10-19)
Ongoing during project operations, the following
practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the
property owner/developer:
• Usage of recycled paper products for
stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
• Recovery of materials, such as aluminum
and cardboard.
• Collection of office paper for recycling.
Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser
printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap
metal for recycling or recovery.
Streets and Sanitation
102 Ongoing during business operations and in
accordance with the Development Requirements
and Maintenance Obligations, OWNER shall be
responsible for restoring any special surface
improvements other than asphalt paving within the
right-of-way, City water easements, Public Utility
easements, private roads, alleys and driveways,
including but not limited to colored concrete,
Water Engineering
stamped concrete, bricks, pavers, concrete, walls,
or landscaping that becomes damaged during any
excavation, repair or replacement of any City
water facility. Provisions for maintenance of all
said special surface improvements shall be
included in the recorded Master C, C & R’s for the
project.
103
The Planning Director has the authority to grant
the modification of the timing of any of the
conditions of approval, provided said modification
does not result in any increase in environmental
impacts for which sufficient mitigation cannot be
provided. Any request for such modification shall
be in writing and shall clearly identify the reason
for the modification. Appeal of such decision
shall be provided pursuant to Section 18.60.135
(Appeals – Planning Director Decisions) of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
Planning Division
104 The subject property shall be developed
substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by
the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1
(Overall Site Plan including Platinum
Vista and Platinum Gateway) Exhibit No. 2
(Platinum Vista Site Plan), Exhibit No. 3
(Tentative Tract Map), Exhibit No. 4, Floor and
Unit Plans), Exhibit No. 5 (Garage Plans), Exhibit
No. 6 (Elevations), Exhibit No. 7 (Site Section),
Exhibit No. 8 (Landscape Plans and Materials
Legend), and as conditioned herein.
Planning Division
EXHIBIT “D”
PLATINUM TRIANGLE INTERIM DEVELOPMENT FEES
[See next page.]
EXHIBIT “D-1"
ELECTRIC UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING FEE
Residential Uses $9.92 per unit
The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and the Underground Conversion Program
envision that the public utilities along Katella Avenue, between the State College Boulevard and
Anaheim Way will need to be undergrounded. The City-owned facilities will be undergrounded
using City funds, pursuant to the Rule No. 20 of the City of Anaheim Rates, Rules &
Regulations.
Some of the facilities along Katella Avenue are owned by Southern California Edison
(SCE). Moneys available to underground City-owned facilities may not be used to underground
SCE facilities. The interim fee will collect the funds necessary to underground the SCE lines,
and thereby significantly improve the appearance of the Platinum Triangle.
The cost to underground the SCE lines is estimated at $187,505. These funds will be
collected by imposing an interim fee on the residential units planned in the Platinum Triangle.
The formula for calculating the fee is the following:
Cost to Underground SCE lines = Per-Unit Fee
Number of residential units
The Per-Unit fee is calculated at:
$187,505 = $9.92 per Unit
18,909 Units
EXHIBIT “D-2"
GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSING FEE
Residential Uses: $24.00 per unit
Non-residential Uses: $0.03 per sq. ft.
These fees are intended to recover the costs associated with the Platinum Triangle including the
designation of portions of the Platinum Triangle for mixed use and office development by the General
Plan, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay, the
Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement Form, Zone Reclassifications, all other
associated documents and amendments thereto, and all associated environmental documentation. The
fees are based upon the following calculations:
Costs
Consultant Contract Costs: $670,623 (includes costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
Planning Department Costs: $456,765 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
Public Works Costs: $41,325 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
$1,168,713 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
New Development Allowed in the Platinum Triangle
Non-Residential Uses
14,340,522 square feet office development
4,909,682 square feet commercial development
+ 1,500,000 square feet institutional
20,750,204 total square feet non-residential development
Residential Uses
18,909 residential units
x 800 square feet (estimated average unit size)
15,127,200 total square feet of residential development
Total Square Feet
20,750,204 total square feet non-residential development
+ 15,127,200 total square feet of residential development
35,877,404 total square feet of residential and non-residential uses
Fees (to be updated with DSEIR Planning and Public Works Costs)
$1,168,713 costs = $0.03 per square foot
35,877,404 total square feet
Non Residential Uses: $0.03 per square foot
Residential Uses: $24.00 per unit ($0.03 x 800 square feet)
EXHIBIT “D-3"
LIBRARY FACILITIES FEE
Residential Uses $486.77 per unit
The increase of density in the Platinum Triangle to an expected population over 27,000 residents requires
the inclusion of a library facility in the Platinum Triangle. The library facilities fee includes the cost of
the purchase of a 10,000 square foot commercial condominium shell space with 50 assigned parking
spaces as well as FF&E and an opening day collection. The projected project cost for a 10,000 square
foot library facility in the Platinum Triangle is $8,004,000. The individual unit library impact fee for the
Platinum Triangle is now $486.77 per unit.
EXHIBIT ”E”
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS
As a condition of approval of the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No.
2007-00002 (Development Agreement No. 2007-00002B), the CITY requires OWNER to
undertake and implement the maintenance of certain areas, facilities and improvements to be
constructed in conjunction with the development of the Property. The initial intended use for
the Project is as a multifamily property with apartments for rent. As such, OWNER shall be
responsible for compliance with the Development Requirements and Maintenance Obligations
described below ("Maintenance Obligations"). If the project is ever converted to a for-sale
condominium project, prior to such conversion the owner of the property at that time
("Current Owner") shall execute and record in the Official Records of the County of Orange,
State of California, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions ("CC&Rs") in a
form satisfactory to the Planning Director and the City Attorney, creating development
requirements and maintenance obligations for an incorporated association ("Association") and
establishing a financial mechanism or financial mechanisms to maintain those areas and
facilities (collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Maintenance Obligations"). Following the
formation of the Association, such Association, or an Assessment District acceptable to the
City, shall take over the responsibility for compliance with the Maintenance Obligations for
the overall Project and the Current Owner shall be relieved therefrom.
The Maintenance Obligations include:
a. Common fences, walls and utility screening devices.
b. Private sewer lines and storm drain lines and facilities, area drains, inlets, manholes
and catch basins, and any appurtenances within the boundaries of the Property that
serve the Project.
c. Private drives and parking, including sidewalks, landscaping, street lighting,
mounted lighting, signage, and striping.
d. Provision for the replacement of any landscaping planted on-site in accordance with
project landscaping plans in a timely manner in the event that landscaping is removed,
damaged, diseased, and/or dead.
e. Parkway and street median landscaping and irrigation along the project frontage
including East Katella Avenue.
f. All landscape improvement and amenities for the Project on the Final Site Plan
including all trees and tree wells, shrubbery and any and all landscaping.
g. All street furniture not maintained by the public utility companies or by the CITY.
h. Maintenance of on-site signs and all special monumentation within the Project,
including community identification signs and their respective sign easements, if any,
and on-site fountains and art elements.
i. Common or open space areas within the boundaries of the Project.
j. All walkways, pedestrian paths within the boundaries of the Project.
k. Covered on-site storage areas for bicycles, scooters and athletic equipment screened
from public view.
l. Centralized recreational amenities within the boundaries of the Project appropriate to
the population mix in the Project, including pools and spas, barbecue areas, clubhouse
meeting room(s) and workout room(s).
m. Maintenance of internal hardscapes, and other common open spaces or areas, if
applicable.
n. Removal of graffiti within 24 hours’ notice of occurrence.
o. Any special surface improvements other than typical concrete or asphalt paving
within the public right-of-way, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks,
pavers or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or
replacement of public utilities including water, electrical, and sewer facilities within
easements.
p. Enclosed parking structures with mail facilities, trash collection areas, and bicycle
storage, including the squeal-free surface in the parking structure.
q. Trash bins and enclosures within the boundaries of the Project.
r. Trash collection and facilities including the Solid Waste Management Plan for the
project as approved by the CITY, including a sign to be posted in each trash collection
area indicating "No Parking Between the Hours of 7 A.M. and 5 P.M." to allow
sufficient access for the trash bin retrieval vehicle.
s. Maintenance of all security equipment required by the Police Department including
antennas providing radio communication.
t. Provision for the continued maintenance of all automatic fire sprinklers systems and
fire alarm system.
u. Maintenance of private water meters and all associated water line improvements.
v. Prohibit the enclosure of any balconies or patios that are shown as unenclosed on any
approved Final Site Plan.
w. Provision that all parking spaces shall remain open and available for their intended
purpose. No storage, staging or other use of parking stalls shall be permitted.
x. Provision for the property to be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by
providing regular landscape maintenance and removal of trash or debris.
y. Demonstrate that the Current Owner and/or Association is prepared to implement
Treatment Controls Best Management Practices for Water Quality Management Plan;
all non-structural BMP's described in the Project WQMP; and, that an adequate
number of copies for all responsible parties) of the approved Project WQMP are
available on-site.
z. So long as the Property is maintained and operated for rent, all leases and/or rental
agreements shall contain a provision in a form acceptable to the City Attorney providing
for the waiver and release by tenants of any claims, demands or causes of action against
the Owner or the City of Anaheim, a municipal corporation (which shall be deemed to be
a third party beneficiary) relating to the proximity of the Project and each tenant's
apartment unit to entertainment venues, especially the Angel Stadium, and the potential
for audible noise associated with said entertainment uses.
If the Property is converted to a for-sale condominium project, all agreements for the
purchase and sale of the condominium units shall contain a similar waiver and release in
form acceptable to the City Attorney.
aa. Provision that requires the subscription to a service that provides "automated
emergency notification" to individual residents of the Project (subject to meeting
minimum standards set by the CITY) following expiration of the initial subscription
required to be purchased by the property owner/developer. Provision to require the
maintenance, in a timely manner, of the database of resident phone numbers in
conjunction with the service, and provide appropriate agencies (police, fire, other
emergency responders, as identified by the CITY) with information on how to activate
the notification via the service provider.
bb. Provision that the Current Owner and/or Association shall not charge for "event
parking" for the Honda Center, The Grove of Anaheim or the Angel Stadium unless
approved by the CITY.
cc. Provisions to restrict loitering and any unauthorized sales of t-shirts, tickets and other
merchandise related to events at the adjacent sports and entertainment venues.
dd. Provision that the Current Owner and/or Association shall handle and dispose of all
hazardous materials and wastes during the operation and maintenance of facilities in
accordance with the State codes identified in Mitigation Measure No. 5.4 1 and under
Anaheim Fire Department supervision.
ee. Provision that, in the event that Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim Traffic
Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic
control services in connection with construction or operation of the project, the
Current Owner shall reimburse the CITY, on a fair-share basis, if determined
appropriate by CITY, for reasonable costs associated with such services.
Until such time as an Association is formed, CC&Rs recorded, and an Association has assumed
responsibility to perform the Maintenance Obligations, the OWNER or its successors or assigns
shall be responsible for the performance of such Maintenance Obligations.
If CC&RS are recorded, the covenants and restrictions set forth in the CC&Rs shall constitute
a general scheme for the development, protection and maintenance of the Property for the
benefit of the Current Owner and all residents. Said covenants and restrictions shall be for the
benefit of the Property and shall bind the Current Owner and its successors and assigns. Such
covenants and restrictions shall be a burden upon, and a benefit to, not only the Current
Owner but also its successors and assigns. All of such covenants and restrictions are intended
to be and shall be declared in the CC&Rs to be covenants running with the land or equitable
servitudes upon the land, as the case may be.
The CC&Rs shall provide that termination of the CC&Rs or amendment of any provision
which may negatively impact performance of the Maintenance Obligations shall require the
prior written consent of the CITY. Termination of the CC&Rs shall not release the Current
Owner with regard to the Current Owner's independent obligations in connection with
development and approval of the Project or with regard to obligations and liabilities incurred
prior to such termination or amendment.
EXHIBIT "F”
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS
Title Department: Escrow Department:
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr
Email: votelt@ctt.com & ken.cyr@ctt.com
Phone: (619) 521-3553 & (619) 521-3555
Fax: (619) 521-3608
Order No.: 930023912-U50
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Lorri Beasley
Email: BeasleyL@ctt.com
Phone: (949) 724-3114
Fax: (949) 724-3186
Reference No.: 128200004-M19
SECOND AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT
Property Address: 1005 East Katella, Anaheim, CA
Dated as of: October 25, 2012 at 7:30 am
In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company
hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies
of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring
against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred
to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions
and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said
Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration
clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable
matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of
the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner’s Policies of
Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for
certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They
are available from the office which issued this report.
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the
issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be
assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company
Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in
Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with
notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be
carefully considered.
It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of
title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE A
1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is:
A fee
2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
See Development limited partnership, a California limited partnership
3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Orange and is
described in the Legal Description, attached hereto:
END OF SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 930023912-U50
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APN 082-261-27
END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and
Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows:
1. Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2012 - 2013
1st Installment: $20,308.03
Penalty: $2,030.80 (Due after December 10)
2nd Installment: $20,308.03
Penalty and Cost: $2,053.80 (Due after April 10)
Homeowners Exemption: $none
Code Area: 01007
Assessors Parcel Number: 082-261-27
2. Intentionally omitted.
3. The property included within this subdivision is subject to annual assessments (commonly referred
to as Mello-Roos assessments) to pay the installation and maintenance cost of improvements and
are currently being collected with the property taxes.
a) ANA EL 2002 BOND 05
b) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 02
c) ANAH EL 2010,SR 2011
d) NOCCD 2002 BOND2005R
e) ANA EL 2002 BOND2007
f) NOCCD 2002 BOND 2003
g) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 03
h) NOCCD 2002 BND 2002A
i) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 06
j) ANAHEIM CITY 1980 BD
k) ANA EL 2002 BOND2004
4. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the
provisions of Part 0.5, Chapter 3.5 or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4 respectively (commencing
with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the
transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A; or as a result of changes in ownership or new
construction occurring prior to date of policy.
5. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records.
6. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document.
Granted to: City of Anaheim
Purpose: installation and maintenance of a water fireline assembly
Recorded: November 28, 1978 in book 12939, page 1457 of Official Records
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
Affects: That portion of said land more particularly described therein
7. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations
secured thereby
Amount: $2,325,000.00
Dated: June 30, 2004
Trustor: See Development Limited Partnership, a California Limited
Partnership
Trustee: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
Beneficiary: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, a Canadian Corporation
Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613523 of Official Records
8. An assignment
Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613524 of official records
of certain of the lessor’s interests under leases referred therein, which assignment recites, among
other things, that it is given as additional security for the Deed of Trust
Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613523 of official records
9. Intentionally omitted.
10. A document entitled “Development Agreement No. 2007-00002”, executed by City of Anaheim, a
Charter City and Municipal Corporation and Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Trust,
the Marshall Family Trust and See Development Limited Partnership, subject to all the terms,
provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded March 20, 2008 as instrument no. 2008-
129034 of Official Records.
A document entitled “Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement No. 2007-00002”, subject to
all the terms, provisions and conditions therein contained, recorded June 14, 2012, as Instrument
No. 2012000337873 of Official Records.
11. An assessment for the District shown below.
District: City of Anaheim Community Facilities District no. 08-1 (Platinum
Triangle)
Disclosed By: District map
Recorded: February 4, 2008 as File No. 2008000051133, Official Records
A document entitled “Notice of Special Tax Lien” pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5
of the California Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the Mello-Roos Community
Facility Act of 1982 recorded August 8, 2008 as File No. 2008000383751, Official Records.
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
12. A document entitled “Memorandum of Agreement”, dated January 6, 2012 executed by See
Development Limited Partnership, a California limited partnership, in favor of Shopoff Advisors,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, subject to all the terms, provision(s) and conditions therein
contained, recorded April 4, 2012, as Instrument No. 2012000192302 and April 5, 2012, as
Instrument No. 2012000192741, both of Official Records.
13. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title
Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in
possession thereof.
This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to
arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the
removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage.
14. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases.
This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements,
assignments, and amendments for review.
END OF SCHEDULE B
Order No.: 930023912-U50
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
0:
Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or
the insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any
controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy,
any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or
other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued
if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title
Insurance coverage.
Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of
Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters
shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the
parties.
Note No. 3: The requirement that a copy of the partnership agreement of the See Development
limited partnership, a California limited partnership be furnished to this Company, together with all
supplements, amendments, etc., thereto.
Order No.: 930023912-U50
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
(continued)
Note No. 4: Your open order request indicates that a Limited Liability Company will be acquiring,
encumbering or conveying real property in your transaction. Under the provisions of “the
California Limited Liability Act, effective September 30, 1994” the following will be required:
1. A copy of the Articles of Organization (and all amendments, if any) that has been filed with
the Secretary of State.
2. The requirement that this Company be provided with a copy of the Operation Agreement.
The copy provided must be certified by the appropriate manager or member that it is a copy
of the current operating agreement.
3. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed then this Company must be provided
with a current list of the member names.
Note No. 5: Plotted easements
Order No.: 930023912-U50
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
(continued)
ATTACHMENT ONE
PRIVACY STATEMENT
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions
From Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this information by selecting the link. For
those of you who are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copy of this information has been
submitted for your review.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Privacy Statement (10-21-03)
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies’ Privacy Statement
July 1, 2001
We recognize and respect the privacy of today’s consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws.
We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information (”Personal Information”), and to whom
it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy Statement
provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable
privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
• From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;
• From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates or others;
• From our Internet web sites;
• From the public records maintained by government entities that we wither obtain directly from those entities, or
from our affiliates or others; and
• From consumer or other reporting agencies
Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Information
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or
intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with
providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes.
Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate
settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal Information:
• to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested;
• to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our
behalf; and
• to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find
of interest.
In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when your direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to
do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise
permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any
agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such
documents may contain your Personal Information.
Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion
Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom
your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or
deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the
costs incurred in responding to such requests.
All requests must be made in writing to the following address:
Privacy Compliance Officer
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
601 Riverside Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Multiple Products or Services:
If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more that one privacy notice from us. We
apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.
ATTACHMENT ONE
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 91
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss,
costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances
and also laws and regulations concerning:
• land use
• improvements on the land
• land division
• environmental protection
This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these
matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date.
This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and
13 of Covered Title Risks.
2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless:
• a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the
Policy Date
• the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you
if you bought the land without knowing of the taking
3. Title Risks:
• that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you
• that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date – unless
they appeared in the public records
• that result in no loss to you
• that first affect your title after the Policy Date – this does not limit
the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title
Risks
4. Failure to pay value for your title.
5. Lack of a right:
• to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in Item 3 of Schedule A
OR
• in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land
This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title
Risks.
In addition to the Exclusions you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the expenses resulting from:
1. Any right, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not
shown by the public records.
2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not
limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks.
3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and
which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the
forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks.
4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land,
whether or not shown by the public records.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or
(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from
coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which
would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but
created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for
the estate or interest insured by this policy.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the
estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the
interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws.
SCHEDULE B, PART I
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by
the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public
records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or
which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof which are not
shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 92
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 93
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92)
WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or
(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from
coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which
would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the
extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured
mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or
to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for
street improvements under construction or completed at Date of
Policy); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of
priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the
lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work
related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent
to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of
the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of
Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance.
7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of
the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of
federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws,
that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being
deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a
result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination;
or
(iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being
deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by
the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public
records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or
which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c)
are shown by the public records.
2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including
those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or
limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 94
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior
to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 11, 13, or 14); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-
business laws of the state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the
Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth-in-lending law.
6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction
creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk
13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public
Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 11(b).
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on
real property or by the Public Records;
(b) Proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or
assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the
Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate
and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public
Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c)
are shown by the Public Records.
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or
(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from
coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which
would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest
insured by this policy.
4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the
estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of
federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws,
that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
ATTACHMENT ONE
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 95
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by
the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public
records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or
which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c)
are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 96
2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including
those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior
to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.
4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting
the Title as shown in Schedule A, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9
of this policy.
5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of
transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency
that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,
whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public
Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the
Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate
and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown by the
Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c)
are shown by the Public Records.
CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and
regulations concerning:
a. building
b. zoning
c. Land use
d. improvements on the Land
e. Land division
f. environmental protection
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these
matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records
at the Policy Date.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15,
16, 17 or 24.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be
constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This
Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the
violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date.
3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the
Policy Date; or
b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You
if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking.
4. Risks:
a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they
appear in the Public Records;
b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless
they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
c. that result in no loss to You; or
d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the
coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25.
5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lack of a right:
a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or
18.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 97
LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows:
• For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.
The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:
Our Maximum Dollar
Your Deductible Amount Limit of Liability
Covered Risk 14: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 15: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
(whichever is less)
ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the Land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part;
or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that s notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public
Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this
policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public
Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this
policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding
from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy
which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
Knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior
to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph
does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in
Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending
law.
6. Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority
which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7,
8(e) and 26.
7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien
of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after the
Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no
longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and
every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged
thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title,
the existence of which are Known to the Insured at:
(a) The time of the advance; or
(b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured
Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of
Interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have
been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit the
coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have
been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with
applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations
of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public
Records at Date of Policy.
Chicago Title Company
Builders Services Division
2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-3400
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 98
You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced
residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than
one qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts.
If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction,
you do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for
escrow or title services in this transaction.
If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is subject of your current
transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier
transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or
approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount.
Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this
transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a
discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is
required to determine if you qualify for a discount which is subject to other terms and conditions.
Order No.: 930023912-U50
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 99
Order No.: 930023912-U50
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 100
Title Department: Escrow Department:
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr
Email: votelt@ctt.com & ken.cyr@ctt.com
Phone: (619) 521-3553 & (619) 521-3555
Fax: (619) 521-3608
Order No.: 930023912-U50
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Lorri Beasley
Email: BeasleyL@ctt.com
Phone: (949) 724-3114
Fax: (949) 724-3186
Reference No.: 118200342
SECOND AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT
Property Address: 1005 East Katella, Anaheim, CA
Dated as of: October 25, 2012 at 7:30 am
In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company
hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies
of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring
against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred
to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions
and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said
Policy or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration
clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable
matters shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of
the parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner’s Policies of
Title Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for
certain coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They
are available from the office which issued this report.
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the
issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be
assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company
Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in
Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with
notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be
carefully considered.
It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of
title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY
Order No.: 930023912-U50
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 101
1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is:
A Fee
2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
Ronald M. Marshall, trustee and Deborah L. Marshall, trustee of the Ronald W. Marshall and
Deborah L. Marshall Revocable Trust, dated January 7, 1989, an undivided 1/2 interest and to the
Marshall Family Trust, dated February 14, 2000, an undivided 1/2 interest, Charles B. Marshall
and Susan M. Marshall, trustees
Vesting Deed: August 07, 2001 as Instrument No. 2001-0540746.
3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Orange and is
described in the Legal Description, attached hereto:
END OF SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 930023912-U50
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 102
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
APN 082-261-28
END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 103
At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed Exceptions and
Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows:
15. Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2012 - 2013
1st Installment: $27,882.10
Penalty: $2,788.21 (Due after December 10)
2nd Installment: $27,882.10
Penalty and Cost: $2,811.21 (Due after April 10)
Homeowners Exemption: $none
Code Area: 01007
Assessors Parcel Number: 082-261-28
1A. Intentionally omitted.
16. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the
provisions of Part 0.5, Chapter 3.5 or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4 respectively (commencing
with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the
transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A; or as a result of changes in ownership or new
construction occurring prior to date of policy.
17. The property included within this subdivision is subject to annual assessments (commonly referred
to as Mello-Roos assessments) to pay the installation and maintenance cost of improvements and
are currently being collected with the property taxes.
a) ANA EL 2002 BOND 05
b) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 02
c) ANAH EL 2010,SR 2011
d) NOCCD 2002 BOND2005R
e) ANA EL 2002 BOND2007
f) NOCCD 2002 BOND 2003
g) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 03
h) NOCCD 2002 BND 2002A
i) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 06
j) ANAHEIM CITY 1980 BD
k) ANA EL 2002 BOND2004
18. The use and control of cienegas and natural streams of water, if any, naturally upon, flowing
across, into or by the herein described land, and the right of way for and to construct irrigation or
drainage ditches through said land to irrigate or drain adjacent lands, as provided in deed(s).
Recorded: June 4, 1919 in Book 332 Page 362 of Deeds
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 104
19. Intentionally omitted.
20. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following facts
disclosed by an ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey, dated as of February 6, 2006, prepared by or
under the direction of Rory S. Williams, LS 6654, for Hunsaker and Associates, Irvine, Inc., : Job
no. 2873-4
A. there is a block wall straddling a portion of the east line of parcel 2.
B. two building overhangs encroach .10 and .40 feet onto parcel 2 from the east adjoiner.
C an aluminum storage area overhang encroaches .10 feet into parcel 2 from the east
adjoiner.
D an aluminum storage area overhang encroaches .50 feet into the east adjoiner from parcel
2.
E. a fence on parcel 1projecting from the east face of the building on parcel 2 shown as
1105 East Katella Avenue encroaches an undisclosed distance onto the east adjoiner.
F. utility wires between a pole in katella avenue and a building on the east adjoiner
overhang parcel 2 near the southeast corner thereof.
21. A document entitled “Development Agreement No. 2007-00002”, subject to all the terms,
provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded March 20, 2008 as Instrument No.
2008000129034 Official Records.
A document entitled “Amendment No. 1 to Development Agreement No. 2007-00002, subject to
all the terms, provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded June 14, 2012, as Instrument
No. 2012000337873 of Official Records.
7A. An assessment for the District shown below.
District: City of Anaheim Community Facilities District no. 08-1 (Platinum
Triangle)
Disclosed By: District map
Recorded: February 4, 2008 as File No. 2008000051133, Official Records
A document entitled “Notice of Special Tax Lien” pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5
of the California Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the Mello-Roos Community
Facility Act of 1982 recorded August 8, 2008 as File No. 2008000383751, Official Records.
22. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records.
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 105
23. Any easements not disclosed by those public records which impart constructive notice and which
are not visible and apparent from an inspection of the surface of said land.
24. A document entitled “Memorandum of Agreement”, dated March 30, 2012 executed by Ronald W.
Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall, Co-Trustees of the Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L.
Marshall Trust, dated January 7, 1989, and Charles B. Marshall and Susan . Marshall, Co-Trustees
of the Marshall Family Trust dated February14, 2000, in favor of Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership, subject to all the terms, provision(s) and conditions therein
contained, recorded April 4, 2012, as Instrument No. 2012000192301 and April 5, 2012, as
Instrument No. 2012000192740, both of Official Records.
25. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title
Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in
possession thereof.
This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to
arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the
removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage.
26. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases.
This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements,
assignments, and amendments for review.
END OF SCHEDULE B
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Privacy Statement (10-21-03)
5:
Note No. 6: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the insured
may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any controversy or claim
between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy, any service of the Company in
connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or other obligation. Please ask your escrow
or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued if you wish to review the arbitration provisions
and any other provisions pertaining to your Title Insurance coverage.
Note No. 7: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of Insurance is less
than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters shall be arbitrated at the
option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the parties.
Note No. 8: If title is to be insured in the Trustee(s) of a Trust, (or if their act is to be insured), this
Company will require a copy of the Trust Agreement including all exhibits listing real and personal property
transferred into the Trust together with complete copies of any amendments or modifications thereto. The
Company must also be furnished with a verification of all present Trustees stating that the copy being
furnished is a true and correct copy of the entire Trust Agreement including all modifications or
amendments; that the Trust is currently in full force and effect; and that it has not been revoked or
terminated.
Note No. 9: The requirement that a copy of the partnership agreement of the Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership be furnished to this Company, together with all supplements, amendments, etc.,
thereto.
Note No. 10: We find no open Deeds of Trust of record. Please verify by inquiry of your escrow personnel
and or agents whether or not we have overlooked something and advise the title department accordingly
prior to closing.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Privacy Statement (10-21-03)
ATTACHMENT ONE
PRIVACY STATEMENT
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions From
Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this information by selecting the link. For those of you who
are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copy of this information has been submitted for your review.
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies’ Privacy Statement
July 1, 2001
We recognize and respect the privacy of today’s consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws.
We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information (”Personal Information”), and to whom
it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy Statement
provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with applicable
privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
• From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;
• From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates or others;
• From our Internet web sites;
• From the public records maintained by government entities that we wither obtain directly from those entities, or
from our affiliates or others; and
• From consumer or other reporting agencies
Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Information
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or
intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with
providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes.
Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate
settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal Information:
• to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested;
• to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our
behalf; and
• to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find
of interest.
In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when your direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to
do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise
permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any
agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such
documents may contain your Personal Information.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Privacy Statement (10-21-03)
Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion
Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom
your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or
deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the
costs incurred in responding to such requests.
All requests must be made in writing to the following address:
Privacy Compliance Officer
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
601 Riverside Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Multiple Products or Services:
If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more that one privacy notice from us. We
apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.
ATTACHMENT ONE
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 109
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss,
costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes building and zoning ordinances
and also laws and regulations concerning:
• land use
• improvements on the land
• land division
• environmental protection
This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these
matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date.
This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and
13 of Covered Title Risks.
2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless:
• a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on the
Policy Date
• the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on you
if you bought the land without knowing of the taking
3. Title Risks:
• that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you
• that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date – unless
they appeared in the public records
• that result in no loss to you
• that first affect your title after the Policy Date – this does not limit
the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title
Risks
4. Failure to pay value for your title.
5. Lack of a right:
• to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in Item 3 of Schedule A
OR
• in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land
This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title
Risks.
In addition to the Exclusions you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the expenses resulting from:
1. Any right, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not
shown by the public records.
2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not
limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks.
3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and
which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the
forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks.
4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land,
whether or not shown by the public records.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or
(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from
coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which
would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but
created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or for
the estate or interest insured by this policy.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the
estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating the
interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws.
SCHEDULE B, PART I
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by
the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the public
records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or
which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof which are not
shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 110
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 111
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92)
WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or
(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from
coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which
would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the
extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured
mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or
to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for
street improvements under construction or completed at Date of
Policy); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of
priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the
lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work
related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent
to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds of
the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of
Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance.
7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of
the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of
federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws,
that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being
deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a
result of the application of the doctrine or equitable subordination;
or
(iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee being
deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by
the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public
records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or
which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c)
are shown by the public records.
2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including
those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or
limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 112
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior
to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 11, 13, or 14); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-
business laws of the state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the
Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth-in-lending law.
6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction
creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk
13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public
Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 11(b).
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on
real property or by the Public Records;
(b) Proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or
assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not shown
by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the
Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate
and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the Public
Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c)
are shown by the Public Records.
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a part; or
(iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the land has been recorded in the public records
at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not excluding from
coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy which
would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest
insured by this policy.
4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured the
estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of
federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws,
that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
ATTACHMENT ONE
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 113
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by
the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the public
records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the land or
which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b) or (c)
are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 114
2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation (including
those relating to building and zoning) restricting, regulating,
prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior
to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.
4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction vesting
the Title as shown in Schedule A, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9
of this policy.
5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of
transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency
that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such proceedings,
whether or not shown by the records of such agency or by the Public
Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by the
Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an accurate
and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown by the
Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in patents
or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights, claims or
title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a), (b), or (c)
are shown by the Public Records.
CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and
regulations concerning:
a. building
b. zoning
c. Land use
d. improvements on the Land
e. Land division
f. environmental protection
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these
matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public Records
at the Policy Date.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14, 15,
16, 17 or 24.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be
constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This
Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of the
violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date.
3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at the
Policy Date; or
b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You
if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking.
4. Risks:
a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not they
appear in the Public Records;
b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless
they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
c. that result in no loss to You; or
d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the
coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25.
5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lack of a right:
a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or
18.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 115
LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows:
• For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.
The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:
Our Maximum Dollar
Your Deductible Amount Limit of Liability
Covered Risk 14: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 15: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
(whichever is less)
ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this policy
and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the Land;
(iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions or
areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land is or was a part;
or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any violation of
these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations, except to the
extent that s notice of the enforcement thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public
Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this
policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above, except
to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a notice of a
defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or alleged
violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the Public
Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit the
coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of this
policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has been
recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not excluding
from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date of Policy
which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for value without
Knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant prior
to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph
does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in
Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending
law.
6. Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority
which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 7,
8(e) and 26.
7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien
of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after the
Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no
longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and
every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged
thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title,
the existence of which are Known to the Insured at:
(a) The time of the advance; or
(b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured
Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of
Interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would have
been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit the
coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have
been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with
applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations
of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public
Records at Date of Policy.
You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced
residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than
one qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts.
If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction,
you do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for
escrow or title services in this transaction.
If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is subject of your current
transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier
transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or
approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount.
Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this
transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a
discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is
required to determine if you qualify for a discount which is subject to other terms and conditions.
RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND
WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO:
City Council
City of Anaheim
c/o City Clerk
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
______________________________________________________________________________
(Space Above Line For Recorder's Use)
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002D)
BETWEEN
CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
ATTACHMENT NO. 10
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002D)
BETWEEN
CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
PAGE
RECITALS ......................................................................................................................................1
Section 1. DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................................5
1.1 Assessment District ..................................................................................................5
1.2 Authorizing Ordinance.............................................................................................5
1.3 City ...........................................................................................................................5
1.4 Development ............................................................................................................6
1.5 Development Agreement .........................................................................................6
1.6 Development Agreement Date .................................................................................6
1.7 Development Agreement Statute .............................................................................6
1.8 Development Approvals ..........................................................................................6
1.9 Enabling Ordinance .................................................................................................6
1.10 Existing Land Use Regulations ................................................................................6
1.11 Final Site Plan ..........................................................................................................7
1.12 Gross Floor Area/GFA .............................................................................................7
1.13 Interim Development Fees .......................................................................................7
1.14 Mortgage ..................................................................................................................7
1.15 Mortgagee ................................................................................................................7
1.16 Owner .......................................................................................................................7
1.17 Parking Areas ...........................................................................................................7
1.18 Permitted Development ...........................................................................................7
1.19 Platinum Triangle.....................................................................................................7
1.20 Procedures Resolution .............................................................................................7
1.21 Project ......................................................................................................................8
1.22 Property ....................................................................................................................8
1.23 Support Commercial Uses .......................................................................................8
1.24 Term .........................................................................................................................8
1.25 Zoning Code.............................................................................................................8
Section 2. TERM ......................................................................................................................8
Section 3. BINDING COVENANTS .......................................................................................9
Section 4. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT ...................................................................................9
Section 5. PROJECT LAND USES ..........................................................................................9
Section 6. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT.............................................................................9
6.1 Description of Permitted Buildings .........................................................................9
6.2 Parking Areas ...........................................................................................................9
Section 7. DENSITY OF PERMITTED BUILDINGS ..........................................................10
Section 8. ENFORCEMENT ..................................................................................................10
Section 9. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ...................................................10
9.1 Public Park .............................................................................................................11
9.2 Utilities (Water, Electrical, Gas, Sewer, & Drainage) ...........................................11
9.2.1 Water Service .........................................................................................................11
9.2.2 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains ..........................................................................11
9.3 Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities ................12
9.4 Traffic Circulation Improvements .........................................................................12
Section 10. REIMBURSEMENT PROVISION .......................................................................12
Section 11. DEDICATIONS AND EXACTIONS ...................................................................12
Section 12. FEES, TAXES AND ASSESSMENT ...................................................................12
12.1 Fees, Taxes and Assessments ................................................................................12
12.2 Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees .......................................................13
12.2.1 Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee ................................................................13
12.2.2 General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee ..................................................13
12.2.3 Library Facilities Fee .............................................................................................13
12.3 Excluded Development Fees..................................................................................13
12.3.1 Water Utilities Fees................................................................................................13
12.3.2 Electrical Utilities Fees ..........................................................................................13
12.3.3 City Processing Fees ..............................................................................................13
12.4 Platinum Triangle Infrastructure and/or Maintenance Assessment District ..........14
12.5 Accounting of Funds ..............................................................................................14
12.6. Imposition of Increased Fees, Taxes or Assessments ............................................14
Section 13. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ......................................14
Section 14. NEXUS/REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGES ..............................14
Section 15. TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................15
Section 16. EXISTING USES ..................................................................................................15
Section 17. FUTURE APPROVALS ........................................................................................15
17.1 Basis for Denying or Conditionally Granting Future Approvals ...........................15
17.2 Standard of Review ................................................................................................15
17.3 Future Amendments to Final Site Plan ..................................................................15
Section 18. AMENDMENT......................................................................................................16
18.1 Initiation of Amendment ........................................................................................16
18.2 Procedure ...............................................................................................................16
18.3 Consent ..................................................................................................................16
18.4 Amendments ..........................................................................................................16
18.5 Effect of Amendment to Development Agreement ...............................................16
Section 19. NON-CANCELLATION OF RIGHTS .................................................................16
Section 20. BENEFITS TO CITY ............................................................................................16
Section 21. BENEFITS TO OWNER .......................................................................................17
Section 22. UNDERTAKINGS AND ASSURANCES CONTEMPLATED AND
PROMOTED BY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT STATUTE ........................17
Section 23. RESERVED AUTHORITY...................................................................................17
23.1 State and Federal Laws and Regulations ...............................................................17
23.2 Model Codes ..........................................................................................................18
23.3 Public Health and Safety ........................................................................................18
Section 24. CANCELLATION .................................................................................................18
24.1 Initiation of Cancellation .......................................................................................18
24.2 Procedure ...............................................................................................................18
24.3 Consent of OWNER and CITY .............................................................................18
Section 25. PERIODIC REVIEW.............................................................................................18
25.1 Time for Review ....................................................................................................18
25.2 OWNER's Submission ...........................................................................................19
25.3 Findings..................................................................................................................19
25.4 Initiation of Review by City Council .....................................................................19
Section 26. EVENTS OF DEFAULT .......................................................................................19
26.1 Defaults by OWNER .............................................................................................19
26.2 Specific Performance Remedy ...............................................................................20
26.3 Liquidated Damages Remedy ................................................................................20
Section 27. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION ...............................................................21
27.1 Notice to OWNER .................................................................................................21
27.2 Public Hearing .......................................................................................................21
27.3 Decision .................................................................................................................21
27.4 Standard of Review ................................................................................................21
27.5 Implementation ......................................................................................................21
27.6 Schedule for Compliance .......................................................................................21
Section 28. ASSIGNMENT ......................................................................................................22
28.1 Right to Assign ......................................................................................................22
28.2 Release upon Transfer............................................................................................22
Section 29. NO CONFLICTING ENACTMENTS ..................................................................23
Section 30. GENERAL .............................................................................................................23
30.1 Force Majeure ........................................................................................................23
30.2 Construction of Development Agreement .............................................................23
30.3 Severability ............................................................................................................23
30.4 Cumulative Remedies ............................................................................................24
30.5 Hold Harmless Agreement .....................................................................................24
30.6 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge ........................................................24
30.7 Public Agency Coordination ..................................................................................25
30.8 Initiative Measures .................................................................................................25
30.9 Attorneys’ Fees ......................................................................................................25
30.10 No Waiver ..............................................................................................................25
30.11 Authority to Execute ..............................................................................................25
30.12 Notice .....................................................................................................................26
30.12.1 To Owner .........................................................................................................26
30.12.2 To City .............................................................................................................26
30.13 Captions .................................................................................................................27
30.14 Consent ..................................................................................................................27
30.15 Further Actions and Instruments ............................................................................27
30.16 Subsequent Amendment to Authorizing Statute ....................................................27
30.17 Governing Law ......................................................................................................27
30.18 Effect on Title ........................................................................................................27
30.19 Mortgagee Protection .............................................................................................27
30.20 Notice of Default to Mortgagee, Right of Mortgagee to Cure ...............................28
30.21 Bankruptcy .............................................................................................................28
30.22 Disaffirmance .........................................................................................................28
30.23 No Third Party Beneficiaries .................................................................................29
30.24 Project as a Private Undertaking ............................................................................29
30.25 Restrictions ............................................................................................................29
30.26 Recitals ...................................................................................................................29
30.27 Recording ...............................................................................................................29
30.28 Title Report ............................................................................................................29
30.29 Entire Agreement ...................................................................................................30
30.30 Successors and Assigns..........................................................................................30
30.31 OWNER’s Title of Property ..................................................................................30
30.32 Exhibits ..................................................................................................................30
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit "A" Legal Description of the Property
Exhibit "B" Final Site Plan
Exhibit “C” Conditions of Approval
Exhibit “D" Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees
Exhibit “D-1” Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee
Exhibit “D-2" General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee
Exhibit “D-3" Library Facilities Fee
Exhibit "E" Development Requirements and Maintenance Obligations
Exhibit "F" Preliminary Title Report
FIRST AMENDED AND RESTATED
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002
(DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2008-00002D)
BETWEEN
CITY OF ANAHEIM
AND
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P.
This First Amended and Restated Development Agreement (“Development Agreement”)
is entered into this day of , 20__, by and between the CITY OF ANAHEIM,
a charter city and municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and
laws of the State of California (hereinafter "CITY"), and SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P., a
Delaware limited partnership (referred to herein as "OWNER"), pursuant to the authority set
forth in Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division l of Title 7, Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the
California Government Code (the "Development Agreement Statute").
RECITALS
This Development Agreement is predicated upon the following facts:
A. To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in
comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the
State of California adopted the Development Agreement Statute, Sections 65864, et seq., of the
Government Code. The Development Agreement Statute authorizes CITY to enter into binding
development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the
development of such property in order to, among other things: encourage and provide for the
development of public facilities in order to support development projects; provide certainty in
the approval of development projects in order to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation
in project costs and encourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which
will make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public;
provide assurance to the applicants of development projects (1) that they may proceed with their
projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, subject to the conditions of
approval of such projects and provisions of such development agreements, and (2) encourage
private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public economic
costs of development.
B. These Recitals refer to and utilize certain capitalized terms which are defined in this
Development Agreement. The parties intend to refer to those definitions in conjunction with the
use thereof in these Recitals.
C. On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council approved General Plan Amendment No.
2004-00419 setting forth the City’s vision for development of the City of Anaheim (the “General
Plan Amendment”), and certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, adopting Findings
of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and associated Mitigation Monitoring
Plan (“FEIR No. 330"), in conjunction with its consideration and approval of the General Plan
Amendment, amendment of CITY’s zoning code, and a series of related actions.
D. CITY desires that the approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa
Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate
5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company Easement on the north (hereinafter
called “Platinum Triangle") be developed as a combination of high quality industrial, office,
commercial and residential uses, as envisioned in the General Plan Amendment.
E. In order to carry out the goals and policies of the General Plan for the Platinum
Triangle, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use
Plan, setting forth the new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
F. To further implement the goals and policies of the General Plan for the Platinum
Triangle, the City Council has established the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone (hereinafter the “PTMU Overlay Zone”) consisting of approximately three hundred and
eighty-three acres within the Platinum Triangle as depicted in the Platinum Triangle Master Land
Use Plan to provide opportunities for high quality well-designed development projects that could
be stand-alone projects or combine residential with non-residential uses including office, retail,
business services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities
within the area.
G. On October 25, 2005, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and the updated and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 332”) to provide for the implementation of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and in conjunction with its consideration and approval
of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning
Code Amendment No. 2004-00036 and a series of related actions.
H. On December 11, 2007, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to as “FSEIR No. 334”) in conjunction with its consideration and
approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089,
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to
provide for the implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.
I. On October 26, 2010, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment
No. 2008-00471 and approved an amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan
(Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188) and certified EIR No. 2008-00339, to increase the
maximum number of dwelling units permitted in the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,909 dwelling
units, increase the maximum number of commercial square footage to 4,909,682, increase the
maximum number of office square footage to 14,340,522, and add 1,500,000 square feet of
institutional land uses.
J. Section 65865 of the California Government Code allows cities to enter into
development agreements with any person having a legal or equitable interest in real property.
K. OWNER represents that at the time of entering into this Development Agreement,
Owner has an equitable interest in approximately 7.01 acres of real property located in the
Katella District of The Platinum Triangle located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and
Lewis Street, at 905 through 917 East Katella Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of
Orange (hereinafter "County"), State of California (hereinafter collectively called the “Property")
in the Platinum Triangle and zoned PTMU Overlay and more particularly shown and described
on Exhibit A attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference. At the time of entering
into this Development Agreement, OWNER is in escrow to acquire ownership of the Property in
its entirety in fee, and has paid substantial costs in connection with said escrow and in pursuing
certain land use entitlements for the Property.
L. Prior to entering into this Development Agreement, certain development approvals
and permits were approved by the City for the Property, including (1) Conditional Use Permit
No. 2008-05304, to modify setback requirements to construct a 12-story office building, 138
guest room hotel, and a 320-unit residential complex, and to permit a building height that
exceeds 100 feet; and (2) Development Agreement No. 2008-00002, to provide for development
of the project (collectively, the “Existing Entitlements”). Development Agreement No. 2008-
00002 was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange (“Official Records”) on
July 23, 2008, as Instrument No. 2008000351778. Development Agreement No. 2008-00002
shall be referred to herein as the “Existing Development Agreement”. At the time of entering
into this Development Agreement, the Existing Entitlements remain valid and in effect.
M. Upon close of escrow and OWNER’s acquisition of the Property, OWNER desires to
develop the Property in accordance with the provisions of this Development Agreement by
developing a three hundred ninety-nine (399) unit residential apartment project, all as more
particularly set forth in the Final Site Plan (hereinafter collectively referred to as the "Project").
N. OWNER has requested a series of actions to replace the Existing Entitlements and
permit development of the Project consistent with the CITY’s vision for The Platinum Triangle
(collectively, the “Project Actions”), including:
1. General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486 to modify "Table LU-4: General
Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City" to increase the number of dwelling units
and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the Mixed-Use
land use designation of the Platinum Triangle Area and to amend various Elements of the
General Plan to include the addition of a public park;
2. Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107 to make the Zoning Code
consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486, as adopted;
3. Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559 to amend the Platinum Triangle Master
Land Use Plan to reflect General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486, as adopted;
4. This First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2008-00002
(Development Agreement No. 2008-00002D) to amend and restate the Existing Development
Agreement in its entirety in order to provide for the development of the Project and certain
vested development rights in connection therewith; and
5. Tentative Tract Map No. 17494.
O. CITY desires to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in the CITY's General
Plan and the objectives for the PTMU Overlay Zone as set forth in subsection 18.20.010.020 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code, and finds that the Project will accomplish said goals and
objectives.
P. Pursuant to the Final Site Plan, OWNER will submit tentative maps and/or vesting
tentative maps, if required. OWNER further anticipates the submission of detailed construction
plans and other documentation required by CITY in order for the OWNER to obtain its building
permits.
Q. As consideration for the benefits gained from the vested rights acquired pursuant to
the Development Agreement Statute, to conform with the requirements of the PTMU Overlay
Zone, and to comply with the applicable mitigation measures imposed by Updated and Modified
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106 C and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307 for the
Project, CITY is requiring that OWNER construct and install certain public improvements,
including off-site traffic circulation improvements, and provide other public benefits.
R. In order to avoid any misunderstandings or disputes which may arise from time to
time between OWNER and CITY concerning the proposed development of the Project and to
assure each party of the intention of the other as to the processing of any land use entitlements
which now or hereafter may be required for such development, the parties believe it is desirable
to set forth their intentions and understandings in this Development Agreement. In order for
both CITY and OWNER to achieve their respective objectives, it is imperative that each be as
certain as possible that OWNER will develop and that CITY will permit OWNER to develop the
Project and public improvements as approved by CITY within the time periods provided in this
Development Agreement.
S. CITY, as a charter city, has enacted Ordinance No. 4377 on November 23, 1982,
which makes CITY subject to the Development Agreement Statute. Pursuant to Section 65865
of the Development Agreement Statute, CITY adopted Resolution No. 82R-565 (the "Procedures
Resolution") on November 23, 1982. The Procedures Resolution establishes procedures and
requirements for the consideration of development agreements upon receipt of an application.
T. On May 22, 2012, as required by Section 1.0 of the Procedures Resolution, OWNER
submitted to the Planning Department an application for approval of a development agreement
(hereinafter called the "Application"). The Application included a proposed development
agreement (the "Proposed Development Agreement").
U. On November 22, 2012, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement
Statute and Section 2.1 of the Procedures Resolution, the Planning Director gave public notice of
the City Planning Commission's intention to consider a recommendation to the City Council
regarding adoption of the Proposed Development Agreement.
V. On December 3, 2012, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement
Statute and Section 2.2 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Planning Commission held a
public hearing on the Application.
W. On that date, the City Planning Commission, after considering the requirements of
the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), including Section 21166 of the California
Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, found and determined
and recommended that the City Council find that previously-certified FSEIR No. 339, together
with Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 thereto, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program
No. 106C for the Platinum Triangle, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307, are adequate to
serve as the required environmental documentation for this Development Agreement, and related
Project Actions, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental
documentation need be prepared for this Development Agreement.
X. The Planning Commission further found that the Development Agreement meets the
following standards set forth in Section 2.3 of the Procedures Resolution, to wit, that the
Proposed Project: (a) is consistent with the CITY's existing General Plan, (b) is compatible with
the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed for the applicable zoning district, (c) is
compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area and (d) is not
otherwise detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of CITY. Based
upon the aforesaid findings, the City Planning Commission recommended that the City Council
approve the Application and this Development Agreement pursuant to Resolution No. PC2012-
____.
Y. On , 20 , as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Statute
and Section 3.1 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Clerk caused public notice to be given of
the City Council's intention to consider adoption of a development agreement.
Z. On December 18, 2012, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement
Statute and Section 3.2 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Council held a public hearing on
the Application.
AA. On that date, the City Council, after considering the requirements of CEQA,
including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the
CEQA Guidelines, did find and determined that previously-certified FSEIR No. 339, together
with Addenda Nos. 1 and 2 thereto, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program
No. 106C for the Platinum Triangle, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307, are adequate to
serve as the required environmental documentation for this Development Agreement, and related
Project Actions, and satisfies all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental
documentation need be prepared for this Development Agreement.
BB. On December 18, 2012, the City Council found and determined that this
Development Agreement: (i) is consistent with the CITY's existing General Plan; (ii) is not
otherwise detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of CITY; (iii) is
entered into pursuant to and constitutes a present exercise of the CITY's police power; and (iv) is
entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Section 65867 of the
Development Agreement Statute and the Procedures Resolution.
CC. In preparing and adopting the General Plan and in granting the Development
Approvals, CITY considered the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of CITY and
prepared in this regard an extensive environmental impact report and other studies. Without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, in preparing and adopting the General Plan and in
granting the Development Approvals, the City Council carefully considered and determined the
projected needs (taking into consideration the planned development of the Project and all other
areas within the CITY) for water service, sewer service, storm drains, electrical facilities,
traffic/circulation infrastructure, police and fire services, paramedic and similar improvements,
facilities and services within the Platinum Triangle, and the appropriateness of the density and
intensity of the development comprising the Project and the needs of the CITY and surrounding
areas for other infrastructure.
DD. On , 20 , the City Council adopted the Authorizing Ordinance authorizing the
execution of this Development Agreement.
NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in the Development Agreement
Statute, as it applies to CITY, and pursuant to the Enabling Ordinance, the Procedures
Resolution and the CITY's inherent powers as a charter city, and pursuant to the mutual promises
and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows:
Section 1. DEFINITIONS.
The following words and phrases are used as defined terms throughout this Development
Agreement, and each defined term shall have the meaning set forth below.
1.1 Assessment District. "Assessment District" for purposes of this Development
Agreement means a special district, assessment district or benefit area existing pursuant to State
law or the charter powers of the CITY for purposes of financing the cost of public
improvements, facilities, services and/or public facilities fees within a distinct geographic area of
the CITY.
l.2 Authorizing Ordinance. The "Authorizing Ordinance" means Ordinance No. ______
approving this Development Agreement.
l.3 CITY. The "CITY" means the City of Anaheim, a charter city and municipal
corporation, duly organized and existing under its charter and the Constitution and laws of the
State of California.
l.4 Development. "Development" means the improvement of the Property for purposes
of effecting the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project, including, without
limitation: grading, the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project
whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of structures and buildings and
the installation of landscaping.
1.5 Development Agreement. “Development Agreement” means this Development
Agreement and any subsequent amendments to this Development Agreement which have been
made in compliance with the provisions of this Development Agreement, the Development
Agreement Statute, the Enabling Ordinance, and the Procedures Resolution.
l.6 Development Agreement Date. The "Development Agreement Date" means the
effective date of the Authorizing Ordinance.
l.7 Development Agreement Statute. The "Development Agreement Statute" means
Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code as it exists on the
Development Agreement Date.
1.8 Development Approvals. "Development Approvals" means the Final Site Plan and
all site specific plans, maps, permits and other entitlements to use of every kind and nature
contemplated by the Final Site Plan which are approved or granted by CITY in connection with
development of the Property, including, but not limited to: site plans, tentative and final
subdivision maps, vesting tentative maps, variances, conditional use permits and grading,
building and other similar permits. To the extent any of such site specific plans, maps, permits
and other entitlements to use are amended from time to time, "Development Approvals" shall
include, if OWNER and CITY agree in writing, such matters as so amended. If this
Development Agreement is required by law to be amended in order for "Development
Approvals" to include any such amendments, "Development Approvals" shall not include such
amendments unless and until this Development Agreement is so amended.
1.9 Enabling Ordinance. The "Enabling Ordinance" means Ordinance No. 4377 enacted
by the CITY on November 23, 1982.
1.10 Existing Land Use Regulations. “Existing Land Use Regulations” mean the
ordinances and regulations adopted by the City of Anaheim in effect on the Development
Agreement Date, including the adopting ordinances and regulations that govern the permitted
uses of land, the density and intensity of use, and the design, improvement, construction
standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property, including, but not
limited to, the General Plan, the Zoning Code, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan,
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C, and all other ordinances of the
City establishing subdivision standards, park regulations, impact or development fees and
building and improvement standards, but only to the extent the Zoning Ordinance and such other
regulations are not inconsistent with this Development Agreement. Existing Land Use
Regulations do not include non-land use regulations, which includes taxes.
1.11 Final Site Plan. The "Final Site Plan" means the Project as described in this
Development Agreement and conditions with respect thereto, as set forth as Exhibit B attached
hereto and made a part hereof by this reference.
1.12 Gross Floor Area/GFA. "Gross Floor Area" or "GFA" means the gross floor area of
any buildings which are part of the Permitted Development.
1.13 Interim Development Fees. "Interim Development Fees" are the fees imposed
within the Platinum Triangle pending adoption of permanent fee programs by the City as set
forth in Paragraph 12.2 of this Development Agreement.
1.14 Mortgage. "Mortgage" means a mortgage, deed of trust or sale and leaseback
arrangement or other transaction in which the Property, or a portion thereof or an interest therein,
is pledged as security.
1.15 Mortgagee. "Mortgagee" means the holder of the beneficial interest under a
Mortgage, or the owner of the Property, or interest therein, under a Mortgage.
1.16 OWNER. "OWNER" is Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership,
and any person or entity with which or into which Shopoff Advisors, L.P. may merge, and any
person or entity who may acquire substantially all of the assets of Shopoff Advisors, L.P., and
any person or entity who receives any of the rights or obligations of under this Development
Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 28 (Assignment) of this Development
Agreement.
1.17 Parking Areas. The "Parking Areas" means all parking structure(s), and/or all
surface parking servicing the Project.
1.18 Permitted Development. "Permitted Development" includes all buildings and the
Parking Areas as identified in Section 6 of this Development Agreement and as further set forth
in the Final Site Plan. This Development Agreement establishes maximum and minimum
characteristics for all Permitted Development as set forth in the Final Site Plan.
1.19 Platinum Triangle. “Platinum Triangle" means that portion of the City of Anaheim
generally bounded on the east by the Santa Ana River, on the south by the Anaheim city limits,
on the west by the Santa Ana Freeway, and on the north by the Southern California Edison
Easement.
1.20 Procedures Resolution. The "Procedures Resolution" is Resolution No. 82R-565
adopted by CITY pursuant to Section 65865 of the Development Agreement Statute.
1.21 Project. The "Project" means the development project contemplated by the Final
Site Plan with respect to the Property, including but not limited to on-site and off-site
improvements, as such development project is further defined, enhanced or modified pursuant to
the provisions of this Development Agreement and the Development Approvals.
1.22 Property. The "Property" means that certain real property shown and described on
Exhibit A to this Development Agreement.
1.24 Term. "Term" is defined in Section 2 of this Development Agreement.
1.25 Zoning Code. “Zoning Code” refers to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Section 2. TERM.
2.1 This Development Agreement is intended to replace the Existing Development
Agreement and to reflect the agreement of the parties to the amendment and restatement of the
Existing Development Agreement.
2.2 The term (hereinafter called "Term") of this Development Agreement shall be that
period of time during which this Development Agreement shall be in effect and bind the parties
hereto. The Term shall commence on the Development Agreement Date and shall extend for a
period of five (5) years thereafter, expiring at the end of the day on the fifth anniversary of the
Development Agreement Date unless extended for an additional five (5) years upon Developer’s
timely request, as discussed in Section 2.3 below, and subject to the periodic review and
modification or termination provisions defined in Section 25 and Section 27, respectively, of this
Development Agreement, and further subject to a reasonable extension for completion of the
Project in accordance with the Timing of Development schedule set forth in Section 15 of this
Development Agreement.
2.3 So long as Developer is not otherwise in default of one or more provisions of this
Development Agreement, Developer may request, and City shall grant upon receipt of a timely
written request from Developer, one extension that will extend the Term for an additional five
(5) years from the date that this Development Agreement is set to expire. Developer shall submit
its written request to extend this Development Agreement to City no sooner than one (1) year,
and no later than thirty (30) days, before this Development Agreement is set to expire. Upon the
submission by Developer of a valid timely written request to extend, and the City’s receipt
thereof, this Development Agreement shall be deemed to be automatically extended for the
additional 5-year period.
2.4 This Development Agreement shall terminate and be of no force and effect upon the
occurrence of the entry of a final judgment or issuance of a final order, after all appeals have
been exhausted, directed to CITY as a result of any lawsuit filed against CITY to set aside,
withdraw or abrogate the approval of the City Council of this Development Agreement or if
termination occurs pursuant to the provisions of the Procedures Resolution and such termination
is so intended thereby.
2.5 If not already terminated by reason of any other provision in this Development
Agreement, or for any other reason, this Development Agreement shall automatically terminate
and be of no further force and effect upon completion of the Project pursuant to the terms of this
Development Agreement and any further amendments thereto and the issuance of all occupancy
permits and acceptance by CITY of all dedications and improvements as required by the
development of the Project.
Section 3. BINDING COVENANTS.
The provisions of this Development Agreement to the extent permitted by law shall
constitute covenants which shall run with the Property for the benefit thereof, and the benefits of
this Development Agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and all successors
in interest to the parties hereto.
Section 4. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT.
As a material part of the consideration of this Development Agreement, unless otherwise
provided herein, the parties agree that the Existing Land Use Regulations shall be applicable to
development of the Project. In connection with all subsequent discretionary actions by CITY
required to implement the Final Site Plan and any discretionary actions which CITY takes or has
the right to take under this Development Agreement relating to the Project, including any review,
approval, renewal, conditional approval or denial, CITY, shall exercise its discretion or take
action in a manner which complies and is consistent with the Final Site Plan, the Existing Land
Use Regulations and such other standards, terms and conditions expressly contained in this
Development Agreement. CITY shall accept and timely process, in the normal manner for
processing such matters as may then be applicable, all applications for further approvals with
respect to the Project called for or required under this Development Agreement, including, any
necessary site plan, tentative map, vesting tentative map, final map and any grading, construction
or other permits filed by OWNER in accordance with the Development Approvals.
Section 5. PROJECT LAND USES.
5.1 The Property shall be used for such uses as may be permitted by the Development
Approvals and the Existing Land Use Regulations. The Term, the density and intensity of use,
developable GFA, footprint square footage, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings
and structures, lot sizes, set back requirements, zoning, public improvements, and the provisions
for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the
Development Approvals, the Existing Land Use Regulations and this Development Agreement
pursuant to Section 65865.2 of the Development Agreement Statute.
Section 6. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT.
6.1 Description of Permitted Development. The Permitted Development shall be as set
forth on the Final Site Plan. The Project shall be constructed substantially in conformance with
the Final Site Plan.
6.2 Parking Areas. The Parking Areas shall be constructed so that there will be
sufficient parking spaces available within the Property to serve the Project, as depicted and
substantially in conformance with the Final Site Plan. Prior to issuance of the first building
permit, the Owner shall record a covenant against the property in a form approved by the City
Attorney’s Office that requires Owner and its heirs, assignees and successor-in-interests to
reimburse the City for the full cost associated with the use of any Police Department and/or
Traffic Management Center staff that may be needed for traffic control purposes related to the
use of Parking Areas for public parking in connection with events in the Platinum Triangle,
including events at Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, or the Grove of Anaheim.
Section 7. DENSITY OF PERMITTED BUILDINGS.
The Permitted Buildings shall be between the minimum and maximum sizes, and shall
not exceed the maximum heights and maximum footprints set forth on the Final Site Plan.
Section 8. ENFORCEMENT.
Unless this Development Agreement is terminated or cancelled pursuant to the provisions
of this Development Agreement, this Development Agreement or any amendment hereto, shall
be enforceable by any party hereto notwithstanding any change hereafter in any applicable
general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance or building ordinance
adopted by CITY which alters or amends the rules, regulations or policies of Development of the
Project as provided in this Development Agreement pursuant to Section 65865.4 of the
Development Agreement Statute; provided, however, that the limitations of this Section shall not
apply to changes mandated by State or Federal laws or other permissible changes or new
regulations as more particularly set forth in Section 23 of this Development Agreement.
Section 9. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES.
In addition to performing any other obligations heretofore imposed as conditions of
approval set forth in Exhibit C, as material consideration for the CITY's entering into this
Development Agreement, OWNER shall undertake the construction and installation of the
following public improvements required to support the Project and to enhance area-wide traffic
circulation and emergency police and fire protection service within the time periods as set forth
below and in conformance with the Existing Land Use Regulations. CITY shall cooperate with
OWNER for the purpose of coordinating all public improvements constructed under the
Development Approvals or this Development Agreement to existing or newly constructed public
improvements, whether located within or outside of the Property. OWNER shall be responsible
for and use good faith efforts to acquire any right(s)-of-way necessary to construct the public
facility improvements required by, or otherwise necessary to comply with the conditions of, this
Development Agreement or any Development Approvals. Should it become necessary due to
OWNER's failure or inability to acquire said right(s)-of-way within four months after OWNER
begins its efforts to so acquire said right(s)-of-way, CITY shall negotiate the purchase of the
necessary right(s)-of-way to construct the public improvements as required by, or otherwise
necessary to comply with the conditions of, this Development Agreement and, if necessary in
accordance with the procedures established by State law, and the limitations hereinafter set forth
in this Section, CITY may use its powers of eminent domain to condemn said required right(s)-of
way. OWNER agrees to pay for all costs associated with said acquisition and condemnation
proceedings. If the CITY cannot make the proper findings or if for some other reason under the
condemnation laws CITY is prevented from acquiring the necessary right(s)-of-way to enable
OWNER to construct the public improvements required by, or otherwise necessary to comply
with the conditions of, this Development Agreement, then the parties agree to amend this
Development Agreement to modify OWNER's obligations accordingly. Any such required
modification shall involve the substitution of other considerations or obligations by OWNER (of
similar value) as are negotiated in good faith between the parties hereto. Nothing contained in
this Section shall be deemed to constitute a determination or resolution of necessity by CITY to
initiate condemnation proceedings.
9.1 Public Park. Section 18.20.110.0101 of the Zoning Code requires that, if the
Property is eight (8) or more acres with residential development totaling more than 325 dwelling
units, Owner shall be required to dedicate, improve and maintain a minimum size of 44 square
feet for each residential unit for public park purposes. Therefore, because the Property meets
these requirements, OWNER shall be required to dedicate, improve, and provide for
maintenance of a public park, with a minimum size of 44 square feet for each residential unit, for
public park purposes as set forth in the Final Site Plan. The public park shall be a minimum of
0.40 acres (399 residential units x 44 square feet for each residential unit). OWNER shall enter
into an agreement with the CITY for maintenance of the park prior to OWNER dedicating the
park to the CITY. City agrees that it shall not unreasonably withhold acceptance of the
dedication of the park land. The value of the park land dedication will be credited against overall
park in-lieu fees paid for the Project. The credit for the park land dedication shall be based on
the current adopted park in-lieu fee resolution at the time the park is accepted for dedication by
the CITY. Consistent with existing Code requirements and policies, no credit will be given for
improvements. The public park shall be constructed prior to issuance of a certificate of
occupancy for the 300th residential unit in the Project.
9.2 Utilities (Water, Electrical, Gas, Sewer, and Drainage). OWNER shall construct
the public improvements necessary for the provision of requisite water, electrical, gas, sewer and
drainage requirements for Project as more fully set forth in the Development Approvals.
OWNER shall construct and relocate utilities as may be required to provide services to the
Permitted Development on the Property or that are displaced by the construction of the Permitted
Development. As OWNER submits detailed construction plans in order to obtain building
permits for the Permitted Development and/or the size and nature of the Project varies, the
utilities that OWNER will construct or relocate may be revised accordingly by the CITY.
9.2.1 Water Service. OWNER will provide engineering studies to size the water mains
for ultimate development within the Project. Said engineering studies will be conducted prior to
rendering of water service or signature approval of the final water improvement plans, whichever
occurs first. The studies shall be subject to the approval of the General Manager, Public Utilities
Department or authorized designee. Alternatively, at OWNER’S election, the water system may
be constructed incrementally, provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide
municipal demands and fire flow protection for the proposed development phasing. OWNER
will conform with Rule 15D of the Water Utility's Rates, Rules and Regulations which provides
for, in part, a fee based on GFA and the advancement of additional funds to construct the
upgraded water facilities. OWNER shall be entitled to reimbursement in accordance with the
terms of Rule l5D for the advancement of additional funds to construct the upgraded water
facilities.
9.2.2 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains. Prior to final building and zoning inspections
for the first building within the Permitted Development, OWNER will construct all sanitary
sewers and storm drains and appurtenant structures (including treatment control BMP’s as
required by the WQMP) to serve the ultimate development of the Property as provided by area-
wide engineering studies to be conducted prior to issuance of any building permits for the first
building within the Permitted Development and updated prior to the issuance of any building
permits for each subsequent building within the Permitted Development. All studies shall be
subject to the approval of the City Engineer. OWNER will construct improvements identified in
said studies. The systems may be constructed incrementally subject to the approval of the City
Engineer, provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide capacity for the
proposed development phasing.
9.3 Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities. The
timing, phasing and sequence of the construction of public improvements and facilities or the
payment of fees therefor shall be constructed or paid in accordance with the timing, phasing and
sequence set forth in this Development Agreement and the Final Site Plan.
9.4 Traffic Circulation Improvements. In order to assist CITY in providing for
area-wide traffic circulation as required by this Project, OWNER shall cause to be made the
traffic circulation improvements identified for the Project including all applicable measures from
the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with
Subsequent EIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307, as shown on the Final Site
Plan.
Section 10. [INTENTIONALLY OMITTED]
Section 11. DEDICATIONS AND EXACTIONS.
OWNER hereby agrees to and shall arrange for dedication to CITY of the ultimate rights-
of-way needed by CITY for the widening of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street adjacent to the
Property as soon as possible following the date of adoption of the Authorizing Ordinance but not,
in any event, later than ninety (90) days following the Development Agreement Date. Since
OWNER may not be the owner in fee of the Property upon adoption of the Authorizing
Ordinance, OWNER hereby agrees to use its best good faith efforts to arrange for the owner of
the Property to irrevocably offer for dedication to CITY said rights-of-way prior to OWNER'S
acquisition of the Property.
If OWNER is unable to arrange for the current owner of the Property to dedicate to CITY
the ultimate public rights-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street
adjacent to the Property prior to OWNER'S acquisition of the Property, OWNER nevertheless
agrees to and shall irrevocably offer for dedication to CITY the rights-of-way needed by CITY
for the widening of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street adjacent to the Property following
OWNER'S acquisition of the Property at such time as the City Engineer deems necessary and
appropriate but not, in any event, later than ninety (90) days following the Development
Agreement Date.
To the extent that OWNER has arranged for the dedication to CITY of the ultimate
public rights-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street adjacent to
the Property prior to taking title to the Property, CITY hereby agrees to and shall either (1)
reimburse OWNER for the substantiated actual cost it has paid to the owner of the Property in
exchange for the dedication by said owner to CITY of the land area constituting the ultimate
public right-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue but not for the land area
dedicated for the widening of Lewis Street, or (2) pay said owner directly an amount equal to
the product obtained by multiplying the square footage of the land area comprising the ultimate
public right-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue dedicated by said owner to
CITY (but not for the land area dedicated for the widening of Lewis Street) by the per-square-
foot price paid or agreed to be paid by OWNER to the owner for the Property; provided,
however, that, in either event, the City's total obligation under this paragraph shall be the lesser
of (i) the product obtained by multiplying the square footage of the land area comprising the
ultimate public right-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue (but not for the land
area dedicated for the widening of Lewis Street) by the per-square-foot price (which is to be
calculated based on the purchase price paid (or to be paid) by OWNER to said owner of the
Property plus OWNER-paid closing costs and expenses (e.g., sales commission, title policy,
etc.), if any, in connection with OWNER’s acquisition of the Property) (the “Dedication Cost”),
or (ii) the maximum amount allowable for right -of-way acquisition set forth in the Platinum
Triangle Community Facilities District Implementation Plan (herein the "Implementation
Plan"). To the extent that the amount payable by CITY to the owner of the Property for the land
area comprising the ultimate public right-of-way necessary for the widening of Katella Avenue
is less than the amount OWNER paid therefor to said owner, CITY shall not be responsible for
payment to said owner of any differential.
To the extent that OWNER, rather than the current owner of the Property, irrevocably
offers for dedication to CITY the land area determined necessary by CITY for the widening of
Katella Avenue, CITY hereby agrees to and shall pay OWNER the lesser of (i) the Dedication
Cost, or (ii) the maximum amount allowable for right-of-way acquisition set forth in the
Implementation Plan.
Funding for the acquisition of the ultimate public right-of-way necessary for the widening
of Katella Avenue shall be paid through and in accordance with the terms and provisions of the
existing Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District.
The dedication of the ultimate public rights-of-way determined by the City Engineer to
be necessary for the widening of Lewis Street shall be at no cost to CITY and shall not be
subject to reimbursement through the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District or from
the proceeds of any bonds or other indebtedness or reimbursement mechanism that might be or
become available; provided, however, that CITY hereby agrees to and shall in consideration for
the dedication of the ultimate public rights-of-way for the widening of Lewis Street, at CITY'S
own sole cost and expense (including the use of funds identified for reimbursement in the
Implementation Plan or in the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District), design and
undertake all work necessary to install and construct a vehicular traffic signal and related
improvements at Lewis Street, north of Katella Avenue, at the proposed intersection of the
connector street serving the Project (herein the "Traffic Signal"). OWNER hereby
acknowledges that the timing for the installation of the Traffic Signal shall be in the sole and
absolute discretion of CITY and based upon a determination by CITY'S Traffic Engineer that
the Traffic Signal is warranted.
OWNER hereby agrees to and shall construct, at its sole cost and expense, all roadway
improvements adjacent to the Property along Lewis Street. OWNER may seek reimbursement
for that portion of the roadway improvements identified in those line items set forth in "A.
ROADWAY IMPROVEMENTS" of Project 6A on the Implementation Plan. Reimbursement
shall be at the lesser of (i) the "Unit Cost" for each of said line items, (ii) or OWNER'S
substantiated actual cost and otherwise in accordance with the terms and provisions of an
Acquisition Agreement to be entered into by and between CITY and OWNER under the
Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District provided there are sufficient funds to make
such reimbursement payment.
OWNER hereby agrees to and shall enter into any right-of-entry agreement and/or
temporary construction easements deemed necessary and appropriate and in a form acceptable
to the City Engineer, at no cost to CITY, for the purpose of allowing CITY to construct, or
cause to be constructed, the Traffic Signal and the roadway improvements along Katella
Avenue and Lewis Street, including transitions to private driveways, walkways, landscaping,
and relocation of signage from the dedicated area and other temporary needs as determined by
the City Engineer. OWNER shall work cooperatively with the City in planning, design, and
construction of the roadway improvements and the Traffic Signal.
In addition, prior to issuance of the first building permit for the Project, OWNER shall
irrevocably offer for dedication any rights-of-way not otherwise described above, including the
public connector streets and collector streets, if applicable, and other areas as more fully set forth
in the Tentative Tract Map and the Final Site Plan for the uses set forth in the Tentative Tract
Map and the Final Site Plan. These dedications shall be in fee or as an easement at the discretion
of CITY, and upon completion and acceptance by CITY of the associated improvements in
compliance with the specifications as approved by CITY, CITY may accept OWNER's offer of
dedication. Nothing contained in this Development Agreement, however, shall be deemed to
preclude CITY from exercising the power of eminent domain with respect to the Property or the
Project, or any part thereof.
Section 12. FEES, TAXES, AND ASSESSMENTS.
12.1 Fees, Taxes and Assessments. OWNER shall be responsible for the payment of
fees in the amount and at the times set forth in the Existing Land Use Regulations, as said
amounts and timing may be modified in accordance with this Development Agreement.
12.2 Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees. CITY anticipates that a number of
fees will be adopted to pay the costs attributable to new development in the Platinum Triangle.
The Interim Development Fees constitute amounts estimated by the applicable City Departments
to be the approximate fair share of costs attributable to the Project. If an identified fee has been
adopted prior to issuance of the certificate of occupancy for the Project, the OWNER shall pay
the fee. If an identified fee has not been adopted prior to the issuance of said certificate of
occupancy, the OWNER shall pay the applicable Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees
set forth in attached Exhibit D. If the OWNER has paid a Platinum Triangle Interim
Development Fee, and upon subsequent adoption of a corresponding fee it is determined that the
OWNER has paid an amount greater than the amount payable pursuant to the adopted fee, the
excess amount paid as an Interim Development Fee shall be refunded to the OWNER. CITY
shall not be obligated to adopt any of the identified fees. If any such identified fee is not
adopted, the parties agree that the Interim Development Fee is adequate to address the impacts of
the Project.
12.2.1 Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee. OWNER will pay an Electrical Utilities
Undergrounding Fee as set forth in Exhibit D-1.
12.2.2 General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee. OWNER will pay a processing
FEE attributable to the cost of creating and establishing the Master Land Use Plan and the
PTMU Overlay Zone for the Platinum Triangle, as well as the costs of associated environmental
documentation, as said additional costs are set forth in Exhibit D-2.
12.2.3 Library Facilities Fee. OWNER will pay a Library Facilities Fee as set forth in
Exhibit D-3.
12.3 Excluded Development Fees. Fees Excluded from Existing Land Use Regulations.
The following fees shall not be included among the fees which would otherwise fall within the
definition of Existing Land Use Regulations:
12.3.1 Water Utilities Fees. OWNER will pay all applicable fees in accordance with the
Water Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations in effect at the time of application for service
including Rule 15D which provides for, in part, a fee based on GFA to construct the necessary
water facility improvements within the Platinum Triangle.
12.3.2 Electrical Utilities Fees. OWNER will pay all fees in accordance with the
Electrical Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations in effect at the time of application for service.
12.3.3 City Processing Fees. OWNER shall pay all standard City-wide processing fees
for building permits, zoning review, and other similar fees associated with the Development of
the Project which are in existence at the time of approval of this Development Agreement at the
rate in existence at the time said fees are normally required to be paid to CITY.
12.4 Platinum Triangle Infrastructure and/or Maintenance Assessment District. Prior to
the date a building or grading permit is issued relating to implementation of the Final Site Plan,
or within a period of ninety (90) days from the date of execution of this Development
Agreement, whichever occurs first, OWNER shall execute and record an unsubordinated
covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney’s Office wherein OWNER agrees not to
contest the formation of any assessment district(s) which may be formed to finance Platinum
Triangle infrastructure and/or maintenance, which district(s) could include the Property. The
covenant shall not preclude OWNER from contesting (i) the determination of benefit of such
improvements to the Property, (ii) the properties included in said district or area, (iii) the manner
in which said fee is determined or (iv) the manner in which said improvement costs are spread.
12.5 Accounting of Funds. CITY will comply with applicable requirements of
Government Code Section 65865 relating to accounting of funds.
12.6 Imposition of Increased Fees, Taxes or Assessments. Except as expressly set forth
or reserved in this Development Agreement, CITY shall not, without the prior written consent of
OWNER, impose any additional fee, tax or assessment on the Project or any portion thereof as a
condition to the implementation of the Project or any portion thereof, except such fees, taxes and
assessments as are described in or required by this Development Agreement, including the
Existing Land Use Regulations or the Development Approvals. The rates of such fees, taxes and
assessments shall be the rates in existence at the time said fees, taxes and assessments are
normally required to be paid to CITY, except as otherwise provided in this Development
Agreement. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit CITY from imposing fees,
taxes or assessments on the Property which are unrelated to the approval or implementation of
the project.
Section 13. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS.
In consideration for CITY entering into this Development Agreement and other
consideration set forth in this Development Agreement, OWNER agrees, if deemed by the
Planning Director with the advice of the City Attorney to be applicable and required for the
Property, to record unsubordinated covenants, conditions and restrictions (CC&Rs) applicable to
the Property in a form and content satisfactory to the Planning Director, City Engineer and the
City Attorney incorporating the requirements and obligations set forth in Exhibit E to this
Development Agreement, entitled the “Development Requirements and Maintenance
Obligations.”
Section 14. NEXUS/REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGES.
OWNER consents to, and waives any right it may have now or in the future to challenge
the legal validity of the conditions, requirements, policies or programs required by Existing Land
Use Regulations or this Development Agreement including, without limitation, any claim that
they constitute an abuse of the police power, violate substantive due process, deny equal
protection of the laws, effect a taking of property without payment of just compensation, or
impose an unlawful tax.
Section 15. TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT.
Timing of Development shall be as set forth in the Final Site Plan.
Section 16. EXISTING USES.
CITY and OWNER agree that those existing legally established uses on the Property may
be retained until the Project is implemented. When those existing uses are demolished, no credit
for any such demolished square footage for which Interim Development Fees have not been paid
will be given OWNER against Interim Development Fees due on a square footage basis as
provided for in this Development Agreement. OWNER will pay the full Interim Development
Fees for Permitted Development constructed pursuant to the Final Site Plan.
Section 17. FUTURE APPROVALS.
17.1 Basis for Denying or Conditional Granting Future Approvals. Before OWNER can
begin grading on the Property or other development of the Property, OWNER must secure
several additional permits and/or approvals from CITY. The parties agree that to the extent said
Development Approvals are ministerial in nature, CITY shall not, through the enactment or
enforcement of any subsequent ordinances, rules, regulations, initiatives, policies, requirements,
guidelines, or other constraints, withhold such approvals as a means of blocking construction or
of imposing conditions on the Project which were not imposed during an earlier approval period
unless CITY has been ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the
previous sentence, CITY and OWNER will use their best efforts to ensure each other that all
applications for and approvals of grading permits, building permits or other developmental
approvals necessary for OWNER to develop the Project in accordance with the Final Site Plan
are sought and processed in a timely manner.
17.2 Standard of Review. The rules, regulations and policies that apply to any additional
Development Approvals which OWNER must secure prior to the Development of the Property
shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations, as defined in this Development Agreement.
17.3 Future Amendments to Final Site Plan. Future amendments to all or a portion of
the Final Site Plan which increase the intensity or density of the Development of the Property, or
change the permitted uses of the Property, and are not among those described in Section 18.4 of
this Development Agreement may subject the portion or portions of the Project being amended
or affected by the amendment to any change in the CITY's General Plan, zoning designations
and rules applicable to the Property and further environmental review and possible mitigation of
adverse impacts under CEQA in effect at the time of such amendment. Any such amendment to
the Final Site Plan shall be processed concurrently with the processing of an amendment to this
Development Agreement. It is the desire and intent of both parties, except as set forth herein, that
any such future amendment of the Final Site Plan will not alter, affect, impair or otherwise
impact the rights, duties and obligations of the parties under this Development Agreement with
respect to the unamended portions of the Final Site Plan.
Section l8. AMENDMENT.
18.1 Initiation of Amendment. Either party may propose an amendment to this
Development Agreement.
18.2 Procedure. Except as set forth in Section 18.4 below, the procedure for proposing
and adopting an amendment to this Development Agreement shall be the same as the procedure
required for entering into this Development Agreement in the first instance. Such procedures are
set forth in Sections 2, 3 and 5 of the Procedures Resolution.
18.3 Consent. Except as provided elsewhere within this Development Agreement, any
amendment to this Development Agreement shall require the consent of both parties. No
amendment of this Development Agreement or any provision hereof shall be effective unless set
forth in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of each party hereto.
18.4 Amendments. Subject to the foregoing provisions of this Section, the parties
acknowledge that refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that
changes are appropriate with respect to the details and performance of the parties under this
Development Agreement. The parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect
to the details of the Development of the Project and with respect to those items covered in
general terms under this Development Agreement. If and when the parties find that changes or
adjustments are necessary or appropriate to further the intended purposes of this Development
Agreement, they may, unless otherwise required by law, effectuate such changes or adjustments
as specified in the Development Approvals.
l8.5 Effect of Amendment to Development Agreement. The parties agree that except as
expressly set forth in any such amendment, an amendment to this Development Agreement will
not alter, affect, impair, modify, waive or otherwise impact any other rights, duties or obligations
of either party under this Development Agreement.
Section l9. NON-CANCELLATION OF RIGHTS.
Subject to defeasance pursuant to Sections 25, 26 or 27 of this Development Agreement,
the Final Site Plan and other Development Approvals as provided for in this Development
Agreement shall be final and the rights once granted thereby shall be vested in the Property upon
recordation of this Development Agreement.
Section 20. BENEFITS TO CITY.
The direct and indirect benefits CITY (including, without limitation, the existing and
future anticipated residents of CITY) expects to receive pursuant to this Development Agreement
include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. The participation of OWNER in the accelerated, coordinated and more economic
construction, funding and dedication to the public, as provided in this Development Agreement,
of certain of the vitally needed on-site and area-wide public improvements and facilities, and
assurances that the entire Project will be developed as set forth in the Final Site Plan and this
Development Agreement in order to encourage development of the Platinum Triangle; and
b. The considerations set forth in Sections 9 and 10 of this Development Agreement.
Section 21. BENEFITS TO OWNER.
OWNER has expended and will continue to expend large amounts of time and money on
the planning and infrastructure construction for the Project. OWNER asserts that OWNER
would not make any additional expenditures, or the advanced expenditures required by this
Development Agreement, without this Development Agreement and that any additional
expenditures which OWNER makes after the Development Agreement Date will be made in
reliance upon this Development Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing,
this Development Agreement provides for the completion of public improvements and facilities
prior to the time when they would be justified economically in connection with the phasing of
the Project, and of a size which would be justified only by the magnitude of the Project provided
for by the Final Site Plan and this Development Agreement. The benefit to OWNER under this
Development Agreement consists of the assurance that OWNER will preserve the right to
develop the Property as planned and as set forth in the Final Site Plan and this Development
Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the public benefits to be provided by OWNER to
CITY pursuant to this Development Agreement are in consideration for and reliance upon
assurances that the Property can be developed in accordance with the Final Site Plan and this
Development Agreement.
Section 22. UNDERTAKINGS AND ASSURANCES CONTEMPLATED AND
PROMOTED BY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT STATUTE.
The mutual undertakings and assurances described above and provided for in this
Development Agreement are for the benefit of CITY and OWNER and promote the
comprehensive planning, private and public cooperation and participation in the provision of
public facilities, and the effective and efficient development of infrastructure and facilities
supporting development which was contemplated and promoted by the Development Agreement
Statute. CITY agrees that it will not take any actions which are intended to circumvent this
Development Agreement; provided, however, that any action of the electorate shall not be
deemed an action for purposes of this section.
Section 23. RESERVED AUTHORITY.
23.1 State and Federal Laws and Regulations. In the event that the State or Federal laws
or regulations enacted after this Development Agreement has been entered into, prevent or
preclude compliance with one or more provisions of the Development Agreement, such
provisions of the Development Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary
to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that this
Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent
with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such
remaining provisions impractical to enforce. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY shall not
adopt or undertake any rule, regulation or policy which is inconsistent with this Development
Agreement until CITY makes a finding that such rule, regulation or policy is reasonably
necessary to comply with such State and Federal laws or regulations.
23.2. Model Codes. This Development Agreement shall not prevent CITY from
applying new rules, regulations and policies contained in model codes, including, but not limited
to, the Anaheim Building Code as adopted in Title 15, Section 15.02.
23.3 Public Health and Safety. This Development Agreement shall not prevent CITY
from adopting new rules, regulations and policies, including amendments or modifications to
model codes described in Section 23.2 of this Development Agreement which directly result
from findings by CITY that failure to adopt such rules, regulations or policies would result in a
condition injurious or detrimental to the public health and safety. Notwithstanding the foregoing,
CITY shall not adopt any such rules, regulations or policies which prevent or preclude
compliance with one or more provisions of this Development Agreement until CITY makes a
finding that such rules, regulations or policies are reasonably necessary to correct or avoid such
injurious or detrimental condition.
Section 24. CANCELLATION.
24.1 Initiation of Cancellation. Either party may propose cancellation of this
Development Agreement.
24.2 Procedure. The procedure for proposing a cancellation of and canceling this
Development Agreement shall be the same as the procedure required for entering into this
Development Agreement in the first instance. Such procedures are set forth in Sections 2, 3 and
5 of the Procedures Resolution and Section 65868 of the Government Code.
24.3 Consent of OWNER and CITY. Any cancellation of this Development Agreement
shall require the mutual consent of OWNER and CITY.
Section 25. PERIODIC REVIEW.
25.1 Time for Review. CITY shall, at least every twelve (12) months after the
Development Agreement Date, review the extent of good faith compliance by OWNER with the
terms of this Development Agreement. OWNER's failure to comply with the timing schedules
set forth in the Final Site Plan shall constitute rebuttable evidence of OWNER's lack of good
faith compliance with this Development Agreement. Such periodic review shall determine
compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement pursuant to California Government
Code Section 65865.1 and other successor laws and regulations.
25.2 OWNER's Submission. Each year, not less than forty-five (45) days nor more than
sixty (60) days prior to the anniversary of the Development Agreement Date, OWNER shall
submit evidence to the City Council of its good faith compliance with the terms and conditions
of this Development Agreement. OWNER shall notify the City Council in writing that such
evidence is being submitted to CITY pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.2 of the
Procedures Resolution. OWNER shall pay to CITY a reasonable processing fee in an amount as
CITY may reasonably establish from time to time on each occasion that OWNER submits its
evidence for a periodic review.
25.3 Findings. Within forty-five (45) days after the submission of OWNER's evidence,
the City Council shall determine, on the basis of substantial evidence, whether or not OWNER
has, for the period under review, complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this
Development Agreement. If the City Council finds that OWNER has so complied, the review
for that period shall be deemed concluded. If the City Council finds and determines, on the basis
of substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms and
conditions of this Development Agreement for the period under review, OWNER shall be given
at least sixty (60) days to cure such non-compliance and if the actions required to cure such non-
compliance take more than sixty (60) days, then CITY shall give OWNER additional time
provided that OWNER is making reasonable progress towards such end. If during the cure
period, OWNER fails to cure such noncompliance or is not making reasonable good faith
progress towards such end, then the City Council may, at its discretion, proceed to modify or
terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for compliance in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 27 of this Development Agreement.
25.4 Initiation of Review by City Council. In addition to the periodic review set forth in
this Development Agreement, the City Council may at any time initiate a review of this
Development Agreement upon the giving of written notice thereof to OWNER. Within thirty
(30) days following receipt of such notice, OWNER shall submit evidence to the City Council of
OWNER's good faith compliance with this Development Agreement and such review and
determination shall proceed in the manner as otherwise provided in this Development
Agreement.
Section 26. EVENTS OF DEFAULT.
26.1 Defaults by OWNER. Within forty-five (45) days after the submission of
OWNER's evidence, the City Council shall determine on the basis of substantial evidence,
whether or not OWNER has, for the period under review, complied in good faith with the terms
and conditions of this Development Agreement. If the City Council finds that OWNER has so
complied, the review for that period shall be deemed concluded. If the City Council finds and
determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith
with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement for the period under review,
OWNER shall be given at least sixty (60) days to cure such non-compliance and if the actions
required to cure such non-compliance take more than sixty (60) days, then CITY shall give
OWNER additional time provided that OWNER is making reasonable progress towards such
end. If during the cure period OWNER fails to cure such non-compliance or is not making
reasonable progress towards such end, then the City Council may, at its discretion, proceed to
modify or terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for compliance in
accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 27 of this Development Agreement.
26.2 Specific Performance Remedy. Due to the size, nature and scope of the Project, it
will not be practical or possible to restore the Property to its pre-existing condition once
implementation of this Development Agreement has begun. After such implementation,
OWNER may be foreclosed from other choices it may have had to utilize the Property and
provide for other benefits. OWNER has invested significant time and resources and performed
extensive planning and processing of the Project in agreeing to the terms of this Development
Agreement and will be investing even more significant time in implementing the Project in
reliance upon the terms of this Development Agreement, and it is not possible to determine sum
of the money which would adequately compensate OWNER for such efforts. For the above
reasons, CITY and OWNER agree that damages would not be an adequate remedy if CITY fails
to carry out its obligations under this Development Agreement. Therefore, specific performance
of this Development Agreement is the only remedy which would compensate OWNER if CITY
fails to carry out its obligations under this Development Agreement, and CITY hereby agrees
that OWNER shall be entitled to specific performance in the event of a default by CITY
hereunder. CITY and OWNER acknowledge that, if OWNER fails to carry out its obligations
under this Development Agreement, CITY shall have the right to refuse to issue any permits or
other approvals which OWNER would otherwise have been entitled to pursuant to this
Development Agreement. If CITY issues a permit or other approval pursuant to this
Development Agreement in reliance upon a specified condition being satisfied by OWNER in
the future, and if OWNER then fails to satisfy such condition, CITY shall be entitled to specific
performance for the sole purpose of causing OWNER to satisfy such condition. The CITY's
right to specific performance shall be limited to those circumstances set forth above, and CITY
shall have no right to seek specific performance to cause OWNER to otherwise proceed with the
Development of the Project in any manner.
26.3 Liquidated Damages Remedy. The parties hereto agree that this Development
Agreement creates an obligation and duty upon OWNER to undertake and complete
development of the Project within the time and manner specified herein. In the event OWNER
breaches this Development Agreement by failing to undertake and complete development of the
Project within the time and manner specified herein, the parties further agree that CITY will
suffer actual damages as a result thereof, the amount of which is uncertain and would be
impractical or extremely difficult to fix; therefore, OWNER agrees to pay CITY, in the event of
any such breach by OWNER, the sum of One Hundred Thousand Dollars ($100,000.00) as
liquidated and actual damages which sum shall be in addition to any other remedies available to
CITY as a result of such breach pursuant to this Section 26.
Section 27. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION.
If pursuant to Section 26.1 of this Development Agreement, CITY elects to modify or
terminate this Development Agreement or establish a revised time schedule for compliance as
herein provided, then CITY shall proceed as set forth in this Section.
27.1 Notice to OWNER. CITY shall give notice to OWNER of City Council's intention
to proceed to modify or terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for
compliance within ten (10) days of making the CITY’s findings.
27.2 Public Hearing. The City Council shall set and give notice of a public hearing on
modification, termination or a time schedule for compliance to be held within forty-days after the
City Council gives notice to OWNER.
27.3 Decision. The City Council shall announce its findings and decisions on whether
this Development Agreement is to be terminated, how this Development Agreement is to be
modified or the provisions of the Development Agreement with which OWNER must comply
and a time schedule therefor not more than ten (10) days following completion of the public
hearing.
27.4 Standard of Review. Any determination by CITY to terminate this Development
Agreement because OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Development
Agreement must be based upon a finding by the City Council, based on the preponderance of
evidence, that OWNER is in default and has not cured that default in the timeframe permitted by
Sections 25 and 26 above, as applicable.
27.5 Implementation. Amending or terminating this Development Agreement shall be
accomplished by CITY enacting an ordinance. The ordinance shall recite the reasons which, in
the opinion of the CITY, make the amendment or termination of this Development Agreement
necessary. Not later than ten (10) days following the adoption of the ordinance, one copy thereof
shall be forwarded to OWNER. This Development Agreement shall be terminated or this
Development Agreement as modified shall become effective on the effective date of the
ordinance terminating or modifying this Development Agreement.
27.6 Schedule for Compliance. Setting a reasonable time schedule for compliance with
this Development Agreement may be accomplished by CITY enacting a resolution. The
resolution shall recite the reasons which, in the opinion of CITY, make it advisable to set a
schedule for compliance and why the time schedule is reasonable. Not later than ten (10) days
following adoption of the resolution, one copy thereof shall be forwarded to OWNER.
Compliance with any time schedule so established as an alternative to amendment or termination
shall be subject to periodic review as provided in this Development Agreement and lack of good
faith compliance by OWNER with the time schedule shall be basis for termination or
modification of this Development Agreement.
Section 28. ASSIGNMENT.
28.1 Right to Assign. OWNER shall have the right to sell, mortgage, hypothecate, assign
or transfer this Development Agreement, and any and all of the rights, duties and obligations
hereunder, to an OWNER-controlled and/or OWNER-affiliated entity, including TSG Platinum,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, in OWNER’s discretion and without the need to obtain
further CITY consent, at any time after this Development Agreement becomes effective.
OWNER shall provide CITY with written notice of such assignment or transfer at least seven (7)
business days prior to any such assignment or transfer becoming final. Further, OWNER shall
have the right to sell, mortgage, hypothecate, assign or transfer this Development Agreement,
and any and all of its rights, duties and obligations hereunder, to any person, partnership, joint
venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Development Agreement,
provided that any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer must be pursuant to
a sale, assignment or other transfer of the interest of OWNER in the Property, or a portion
thereof. In the event of any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer, (a)
OWNER shall notify CITY of such event and the name of the transferee, together with the
corresponding entitlements being transferred to such transferee and (b) the agreement between
OWNER and such transferee shall provide that either OWNER or the transferee or both shall be
liable for the performance of all obligations of OWNER pursuant to this Development
Agreement and the Development Approvals. Such transferee and/or OWNER shall notify CITY
in writing which entity shall be liable for the performance of such obligations, and upon the
express written assumption of any or all of the obligations of OWNER under this Development
Agreement by such assignee, transferee or purchaser shall, without any act of or concurrence by
CITY, relieve OWNER of its legal duty to perform said obligations under this Development
Agreement with respect to the Property or portion thereof, so transferred, except to the extent
OWNER is not in default under the terms of this Development Agreement.
28.2 Release Upon Transfer. It is understood and agreed by the parties that the Property
may be subdivided following the Development Agreement Date. One or more of such
subdivided parcels may be sold, mortgaged, hypothecated, assigned or transferred to persons for
development by them in accordance with the provisions of this Development Agreement.
Effective upon such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer, the obligations of
OWNER shall become several and not joint, except as to OWNER’s obligations set forth in
Section 9 of this Development Agreement. Upon the sale, transfer, or assignment of OWNER's
rights and interests under this Development Agreement as permitted pursuant to the Section 28.1
above, OWNER shall be released from its obligations under this Development Agreement with
respect to the Property, or portion thereof so transferred, provided that (a) OWNER is not then in
default under this Development Agreement, (b) OWNER has provided to CITY the notice of
such transfer specified in Section 28.1 above, (c) the transferee executes and delivers to CITY a
written agreement in which (i) the name and address of the transferee is set forth and (ii) the
transferee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the obligations of OWNER under this
Development Agreement and the Development Approvals with respect to the property, or
portion thereof, so transferred and (d) the transferee provides CITY with security equivalent to
any security provided by OWNER to secure performance of its obligations under this
Development Agreement or the Development Approvals. Non-compliance by any such
transferee with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement shall not be deemed a
default hereunder or grounds for termination hereof or constitute cause for CITY to initiate
enforcement action against other persons then owning or holding interest in the Property or any
portion thereof and not themselves in default hereunder. Upon completion of any phase of
development of the Project as determined by CITY, CITY may release that completed phase
from any further obligations under this Development Agreement. The provisions of this Section
shall be self-executing and shall not require the execution or recordation of any further document
or instrument. Any and all successors, assigns and transferees of OWNER shall have all of the
same rights, benefits and obligations of OWNER as used in this Development Agreement and
the term "OWNER" as used in this Development Agreement shall refer to any such successors,
assigns and transferees unless expressly provided herein to the contrary.
Section 29. NO CONFLICTING ENACTMENTS.
By entering into this Development Agreement and relying thereupon, OWNER is
obtaining vested rights to proceed with the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions
of this Development Agreement, and in accordance with, and to the extent of, the Development
Approvals. By entering into this Development Agreement and relying thereupon, CITY is
securing certain public benefits which enhance the public health, safety and general welfare.
CITY therefore agrees that except as provided in Section 23 of this Development Agreement,
neither the City Council nor any other agency of CITY shall enact a rule, regulation, ordinance
or other measure which relates to the rate, timing or sequencing of the Development or
construction of all or any part of the Project and which is inconsistent or in conflict with this
Development Agreement.
Section 30. GENERAL.
30.1 Force Majeure. The Term of this Development Agreement and the time within
which OWNER shall be required to perform any act under this Development Agreement shall be
extended by a period of time equal to the number of days during which performance of such act
is delayed unavoidably by strikes, lock-outs, Acts of God, failure or inability to secure materials
or labor by reason of priority or similar regulations or order of any governmental or regulatory
body, initiative or referenda, moratoria, enemy action, civil disturbances, fire, unavoidable
casualties, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of OWNER.
30.2 Construction of Development Agreement. The language in all parts of this
Development Agreement shall in all cases, be construed as a whole and in accordance with its
fair meaning. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Development Agreement
are for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of
constructions. This Development Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of
California. The parties understand and agree that this Development Agreement is not intended to
constitute, nor shall be construed to constitute, an impermissible attempt to contract away the
legislative and governmental functions of CITY, and in particular, the CITY’s police powers. In
this regard, the parties understand and agree that this Development Agreement shall not be
deemed to constitute the surrender or abnegation of the CITY’s governmental powers over the
Property.
30.3 Severability. If any provision of this Development Agreement shall be adjudged to
be invalid, void or unenforceable, such provision shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any
other provision hereof, unless such judgment affects a material part of this Development
Agreement, the parties hereby agree that they would have entered into the remaining portions of
this Development Agreement not adjudged to be invalid, void or illegal. In the event that all or
any portion of this Development Agreement is found to be unenforceable, this Development
Agreement or that portion which is found to be unenforceable shall be deemed to be a statement
of intention by the parties; and the parties further agree that in such event they shall take all steps
necessary to comply with such public hearings and/or notice requirements as may be necessary
in order to make valid this Development Agreement or that portion which is found to be
unenforceable. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Development Agreement, in the
event that any material provision of this Development Agreement is found to be unenforceable,
void or voidable, OWNER or CITY may terminate this Development Agreement in accordance
with the provisions of the Development Agreement Statute and the Procedures Resolution.
30.4 Cumulative Remedies. In addition to any other rights or remedies, either party may
institute legal action to cure, correct or remedy any default, to enforce any covenant or
agreement herein, or to enjoin any threatened or attempted violation, including suits for
declaratory relief, specific performance, relief in the nature of mandamus and actions for
damages. All of the remedies described above shall be cumulative and not exclusive of one
another, and the exercise of any one or more of the remedies shall not constitute a waiver or
election with respect to any other available remedy.
30.5 Hold Harmless Agreement. OWNER and CITY hereby mutually agree to, and shall
hold each other, each other's elective and appointive councils, boards, commissions, officers,
partners, agents, representatives and employees harmless from any liability for damage or claims
for damage for personal injury, including death, and from claims for property damage which may
arise from the activities of the other's or the other's contractors', subcontractors', agents’, or
employees' which relate to the Project whether such activities be by OWNER or CITY, or by any
of the OWNER’s or the CITY’s contractors, subcontractors, or by any one or more persons
indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for OWNER any of the OWNER's or the CITY's
contractors or subcontractors. OWNER and CITY agree to and shall defend the other and the
other's elective and appointive councils, boards, commissioners, officers, partners, agents,
representatives and employees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for damage caused or
alleged to have been caused by reason of the aforementioned activities which relate to the
Project.
30.6 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge. In the event of any legal action
instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the validity of any
provision of this Development Agreement and/or the Development Approvals, the parties hereby
agree to cooperate fully with each other in defending said action and the validity of each
provision of this Development Agreement, however, OWNER shall be liable for all legal
expenses and costs incurred in defending any such action. OWNER shall be entitled to choose
legal counsel to defend against any such legal action and shall pay any attorneys' fees awarded
against CITY or OWNER, or both, resulting from any such legal action. OWNER shall be
entitled to any award of attorneys' fees arising out of any such legal action.
30.7 Public Agency Coordination. CITY and OWNER shall cooperate and use their
respective best efforts in coordinating the implementation of the Development Approvals with
other public agencies, if any, having jurisdiction over the Property or the Project.
30.8 Initiative Measures. Both CITY and OWNER intend that this Development
Agreement is a legally binding contract which will supersede any initiative, measure,
moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation (whether relating to the rate,
timing or sequencing of the Development or construction of all or any part of the Project and
whether enacted by initiative or otherwise) affecting parcel or subdivision maps (whether
tentative, vesting tentative or final), building permits, occupancy certificates or other
entitlements to use approved, issued or granted within the CITY, or portions of the CITY, and
which Agreement shall apply to the Project to the extent such initiative, measure, moratorium,
referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation is inconsistent or in conflict with this
Development Agreement. Should an initiative, measure, moratorium, referendum, statute,
ordinance, or other limitation be enacted by the citizens of CITY which would preclude
construction of all or any part of the Project, and to the extent such initiative, measure,
moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation be determined by a court of
competent jurisdiction to invalidate or prevail over all or any part of this Development
Agreement, OWNER shall have no recourse against CITY pursuant to the Development
Agreement, but shall retain all other rights, claims and causes of action under this Development
Agreement not so invalidated and any and all other rights, claims and causes of action as law or
in equity which OWNER may have independent of this Development Agreement with respect to
the project. The foregoing shall not be deemed to limit OWNER's right to appeal any such
determination that such initiative, measure, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation
invalidates or prevails over all or any part of this Development Agreement. CITY agrees to
cooperate with OWNER in all reasonable manners in order to keep this Development Agreement
in full force and effect, provided OWNER shall reimburse CITY for its out-of-pocket expenses
incurred directly in connection with such cooperation and CITY shall not be obligated to institute
a lawsuit or other court proceedings in this connection.
30.9 Attorneys' Fees. In the event of any dispute between the parties involving the
covenants or conditions contained in this Development Agreement, the prevailing party shall be
entitled to recover reasonable expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs.
30.10 No Waiver. No delay or omission by either party in exercising any right or power
accruing upon non-compliance or failure to perform by the other party under any of the
provisions of this Development Agreement shall impair any such right or power or be construed
to be a waiver thereof. A waiver by either party of any of the covenants or conditions to be
performed by the other party shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of non-
performance of the same or other covenants and conditions hereof.
30.11 Authority to Execute. The person executing this Development Agreement on
behalf of OWNER warrants and represents that he/she has the authority to execute this
Development Agreement on behalf of his/her partnership and represents that he/she has the
authority to bind OWNER to the performance of OWNER's obligations hereunder.
30.12 Notice.
30.12.1 To OWNER. Any notice required or permitted to be given by CITY to OWNER
under or pursuant to this Development Agreement shall be deemed sufficiently given if in
writing and delivered personally to an officer of OWNER or mailed with postage thereon fully
prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed; to OWNER as follows:
Shopoff Advisors, L.P.
c/o The Shopoff Group, L.P
2 Park Plaza, Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92614
Attn: William A. Shopoff
With a copy to:
Jackson DeMarco Tidus Peckenpaugh
2030 Main Street, 12th Floor
Irvine, CA 92614
Attn: Gregory P. Powers, Esq.
or such changed address as OWNER shall designate in writing to CITY.
30.12.2 To CITY. Any notice required or permitted to be given to CITY under or
pursuant to this Development Agreement shall be made and given in writing, if by mail
addressed to:
City Council
City of Anaheim
c/o City Clerk
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
With copies to:
City Manager
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 7th Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
City Attorney
City of Anaheim
200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 3rd Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
or such changed address as CITY shall designate in writing to OWNER.
Alternatively, notices to CITY may also be personally delivered to the City Clerk, at the
Anaheim Civic Center, 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor, Anaheim, California, together with
copies marked for the City Manager and the City Attorney or, if so addressed and mailed, with
postage thereon fully prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City
Council in care of the City Clerk at the above address with copies likewise so mailed to the City
Manager and the City Attorney, respectively and also in care of the City Clerk at the same
address. The provisions of this Section shall be deemed permissive only and shall not detract
from the validity of any notice given in a manner which would be legally effective in the absence
of this Section.
30.13 Captions. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Development
Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall in no way define, explain, modify,
construe, limit, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of any of the
provisions of this Development Agreement.
30.14 Consent. Any consent required by the parties in carrying out the terms of this
Development Agreement shall not unreasonably be withheld.
30.15 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with and
provide reasonable to the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all
obligations under this Development Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this
Development Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall
promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record
such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary
under the terms of this Development Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the
provisions of this Development Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions
contemplated by this Development Agreement.
30.16 Subsequent Amendment to Authorizing Statute. This Development Agreement
has been entered into in reliance upon the provisions of the Development Agreement Statute in
effect as of the Development Agreement Date. Accordingly, subject to Section 23.1 above, to
the extent that subsequent amendments to the Government Code would affect the provisions of
this Development Agreement, such amendments shall not be applicable to this Development
Agreement unless necessary for this Development Agreement to be enforceable or unless this
Development Agreement is modified pursuant to the provisions set forth in this Development
Agreement and Government Code Section 65868 as in effect on the Development Agreement
Date.
30.17 Governing Law. This Development Agreement, including, without limitation, its
existence, validity, construction and operation, and the rights of each of the parties shall be
determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California.
30.18 Effect on Title. OWNER and CITY agree that this Development Agreement shall
not continue as an encumbrance against any portion of the Property as to which this
Development Agreement has terminated.
30.19 Mortgagee Protection. Entering into or a breach of this Development Agreement
shall not defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of Mortgagees having a mortgage on
any portion of the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law.
No Mortgagee shall have an obligation or duty under this Development Agreement to perform
OWNER's obligations, or to guarantee such performance prior to any foreclosure or deed in lieu
thereof.
30.20 Notice of Default to Mortgagee, Right of Mortgagee to Cure. If the City Clerk
timely receives notice from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to
OWNER under the terms of this Development Agreement, CITY shall provide a copy of that
notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The
Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, for a period up to ninety (90) days after
the receipt of such notice from CITY to cure or remedy, or to commence to cure or remedy the
default unless a further extension of time to cure is granted in writing by CITY. If the default is
of a nature which can only be remedied or cured by such Mortgagee upon obtaining possession,
such Mortgagee shall seek to obtain possession with diligence and continually through
foreclosure, a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure the default or
non-compliance within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or
non-compliance cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period,
then such Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to remedy
or cure such default or non-compliance if such Mortgagee commences cure during such thirty
(30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such cure.
30.21 Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of Section 30.20 of this
Development Agreement, if any Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or pursues and
prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof by any process or
injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any
bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving CITY, the times specified in this Section for
commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other proceedings shall be extended for the period of
the prohibition.
30.22 Disaffirmance.
30.22.1 CITY agrees that in the event of termination of this Development Agreement by
reason of any default by CITY, or by reason of the disaffirmance hereof by a receiver, liquidator
or trustee for OWNER or its property, CITY, if requested by any Mortgagee, shall enter into a
new Development Agreement for the Project with the most senior Mortgagee requesting such
new agreement, for the remainder of the Term, effective as of the date of such termination, upon
the terms, provisions, covenants and agreements as herein contained to the extent and subject to
the law then in effect, and subject to the rights, if any, of any parties then in possession of any
part of the Property, provided:
30.22.2 The Mortgagee shall make written request upon CITY for the new Development
Agreement for the Project within thirty (30) days after the date of termination;
30.22.3 The Mortgagee shall pay to CITY at the time of the execution and delivery of the
new Development Agreement for the Project expenses, including reasonable attorneys' fees, to
which CITY shall have been subjected by reason of OWNER’s default; and
30.22.4 The Mortgagee shall perform and observe all covenants herein contained on
OWNER's part to be performed, and shall further remedy any other conditions which OWNER
under the terminated agreement was obligated to perform under its terms, to the extent the same
are curable or may be performed by the Mortgagee.
30.22.5 Nothing herein contained shall require any Mortgagee to enter into a new
agreement pursuant to Section 30.22.1 above, nor to cure any default of OWNER referred to
above.
30.23 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Development Agreement and all provisions
hereof is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of CITY, OWNER and their
successors and assigns. No other person shall have right of action based upon any provision in
this Development Agreement.
30.24 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and
between the parties hereto that the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as
the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting
entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Development
Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this
Development Agreement. The only relationship between CITY and OWNER is that of a
government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such private
property.
30.25 Restrictions. Property OWNER shall place in any agreements to sell or convey
any interest in the Property or any portion thereof, provisions making the terms of this
Development Agreement binding on any successors in interest of OWNER and express provision
for OWNER or CITY, acting separately or jointly, to enforce the provisions of this Development
Agreement and to recover attorneys' fees and costs for such enforcement.
30.26 Recitals. The recitals in this Development Agreement constitute part of this
Development Agreement and each party shall be entitled to rely on the truth and accuracy of
each recital as an inducement to enter into this Development Agreement.
30.27 Recording. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Development Agreement to
be executed by CITY and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County no later than ten
(10) days after CITY approves this Development Agreement.
30.28 Title Report. CITY is required to sign this Development Agreement only after
OWNER has provided CITY with a satisfactory preliminary title report evidencing and showing
OWNER’s legal and equitable ownership interest in the Property, current within six (6) months,
unencumbered except for the exceptions (hereinafter the “Permitted Exceptions”) set in the
preliminary title report for the Property dated May 24, 2007, attached hereto as Exhibit “F” (the
"Preliminary Title Report"). Any instrument of monetary encumbrance such as a deed of trust or
a mortgage entered into subsequent to the date of the Preliminary Title Report and prior to the
Development Agreement Date, shall contain language expressly subordinating such instruments
of monetary encumbrance to the provisions of this Development Agreement. OWNER shall
present evidence, satisfactory to CITY, of OWNER’s legal title to Property, subject only to the
Permitted Exceptions and any such subordinated instruments of monetary encumbrance, at the
time of recordation of this Development Agreement, or a memorandum thereof.
30.29 Entire Agreement. This Development Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement
between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Development Agreement, and this
Development Agreement supersedes all previous negotiations, discussions and agreements
between the parties, and no parol evidence of any prior or other agreement shall be permitted to
contradict or vary the terms hereof.
30.30 Successors and Assigns. The burdens of the Development Agreement shall be
binding upon, and the benefits of the Development Agreement inure to all successors in interest
and assigns of the parties to the Development Agreement.
30.31 OWNER's Title of Property. Neither party hereto shall be bound by any provision
of this Development Agreement unless and until OWNER shall record this Development
Agreement or a memorandum thereof, in the office of the County Recorder of the County
sufficient to cause this Development Agreement and the obligations contained herein to attach to
and encumber OWNER’s fee title to Property.
30.32 Exhibits. All exhibits, including attachments thereto, are incorporated in this
Development Agreement in their entirety by this reference.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and OWNER have executed this Development
Agreement as of the date and year first above written.
“CITY” “OWNER”
CITY OF ANAHEIM, a SHOPOFF ADVISORS, L.P., a Delaware limited
municipal corporation partnership
By: The Shopoff Corporation, a Delaware
Corporation, its General Partner
By:
Mayor By:
William A. Shopoff,
President & Chief Executive Officer
ATTEST:
________________________
Linda N. Andal
City Clerk
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
________________________
Theodore J. Reynolds
Assistant City Attorney
92249.6
EXHIBIT "A"
LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL A-1: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SAID GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING ABOVE 500 FEET, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, RECORDED SEPTEMBER 28, 1973 IN BOOK 10921, PAGE 428 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL A-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL B-1: PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY GRANTED HEREIN OR ANY PART THEREOF LYING BETWEEN SAID SURFACE AND FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW SAID SURFACE, AS SET FORTH IN DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, RECORDED DECEMBER 23, 1977 IN BOOK 12506, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED DECEMBER 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. [Assessor's Parcels No. 082-261-23 and 082-261-24]
EXHIBIT “B”
FINAL SITE PLAN
List of Exhibits for The Platinum Gateway Project
Exhibit No.
Rendering of Katella Avenue
Tentative Tract Map
A1 Title Sheet
A1.2 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Gateway and Vista Projects Combined)
A2 Site Plan Conceptual Site Plan
A2.1 Fire Access Plan
A3 Conceptual Trash Plan
A4.1 Building Plan – First Floor Plan
A4.2 Building Plan – Second Floor Plan
A 4.3 Building Plan – Third Floor Plan
A4.4 Building Plan – Fourth Floor Plan
A4.5 Building Plan – Fifth Level Garage
A4.6 Building Plan – Sixth Level Garage Roof Plan
A5.1 Elevation – West Elevation Connector Street
A5.2 Elevation – East Elevation
A6 Site Section –Section B
A7.1 Floor Plans – Conceptual One Bedroom Unit Plans
A7.2 Floor Plans – Conceptual Two Bedroom Unit Plans
A7.3 Floor Plans – Conceptual Three Bedroom Unit Plans
L1 Overall Schematic Landscape Plan
L2 Leasing Center Schematic Landscape Plan
L3 Recreation Area Schematic Landscape Plan
L4 Public Park Schematic Landscape Plan
L5 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (Katella Avenue)
L6 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (Lewis Street)
L7 Design Imagery Board
Material and Color Legend
Final Site Plan
List of Exhibits for The Platinum Vista Project
Exhibit No.
Rendering of Connector Street
Tentative Tract Map
A1 Title Sheet
A1.0 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A1.2 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A2 Site Plan Conceptual Site Plan
A2.1 Site Plan - Conceptual Fire Plan
A3 Trash Plan - Conceptual Trash Plan
A4.1 Building Plan – Subterranean Level/First Floor Plan
A4.2 Building Plan – Second Floor Plan/Third Floor Plan
A 4.3 Building Plan – Fourth Floor Plan/Fifth Floor Plan
A4.4 Building Plan – Six Level Garage Plan
A4.5 Building Plan - Seventh Level Garage/Roof Plan
A5.1 Elevation – South Elevation (Katella Avenue),West Elevation (Connector Street)
A5.2 Elevations – North Elevation, East Elevation
A6 Site Sections –Section A, Section B
A7.1 Floor Plans – Conceptual One Bedroom Unit Plans
A7.2 Floor Plans – Conceptual Two and Three Bedroom Unit Plans
L1 Overall Schematic Landscape Plan (Katella Avenue)
L2 Leasing Center Schematic Landscape Plan
L3 Recreation Area Schematic Landscape Plan
L4 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Patio)
L5 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Lounge)
L6 Design Support Images
L7 Schematic Lighting Plan – Katella Avenue
Material and Color Legend
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.CITY OF ANAHEIMPLATINUM GATEWAY ANDPLATINUM VISTA 17494
EXHIBIT “C”
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
NOTE: Mitigation Measures (“MM”), from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 307 are
incorporated into these conditions of approval and are identified by the mitigation
measure number below applicable condition numbers.
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED
OFF BY
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT OR DEMOLITION PERMITS
1
(MM2-3)
Prior to approval of each grading plan (for
Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit Demolition
and Import/Export Plans detailing construction
and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste
reduction measures to be implemented to recover
C&D materials. These plans shall include
identification of off-site locations for materials
export from the project and options for disposal of
excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent
site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a
project in the vicinity or transport to an
environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts
made to move it within Orange County. The
property owner/developer shall offer recyclable
building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for
sale or removal by private firms or public agencies
for use in construction of other projects if not all
can be reused at the project site.
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
2
(MM 3-2)
At least 90 days prior to the initiation of grading
activities, for projects greater than one acre,
coverage for the project must be obtained by
electronically submitting permit registration
documents to the State or obtaining coverage via
current general construction permit prescribed
method by the property owner/developer pursuant
to State and Federal National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As
part of the NOI, a Surface Water Pollution
Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The
property owner/developer shall also prepare and
submit to the Development Services Division of
the Public Works Department, a Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with
the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and
Building Division
Chapter 7 of the Orange County Drainage Area
Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved
prior to issuance of grading permit. The SWPPP,
in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the
structural and nonstructural BMPs that will be
implemented during construction (short-term)
within the Project Area as well as BMPs for long-
term operation of the Project Area that address
potential impacts to surface waters.
3
(MM10-1)
The City Engineer shall review the location of
each project to determine if it is located within an
area served by deficient sewer facilities, as
identified in the latest updated sewer study for the
Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase
sewer flows beyond those programmed in the
appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or
if the project currently discharges to an existing
deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency
in an existing sewer line, the property
owner/developer shall be required to guarantee
mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the
area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and
City Attorney’s Office. Prior to issuance of a
grading permit the sewer plans shall be submitted
for review. Prior to issuance of a building permit
for each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer
study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the project area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
thereof.
Development
Services
4
(MM10-3)
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each
development project, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall contact Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding
sewer capacity. Additionally, if requested by the
OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place
up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a
month to verify capacity and ensure consistency
with the OCSD’s modeling results.
Development
Services
5
(MM10-6)
Prior to issuance of a building permit, additional
analysis shall be performed using flow, wet-
Development
Services
weather data, and other information specific for that
project in order to obtain more accurate results of
the surcharge levels for final design.
6
(MM10-8)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit,
the property owner/developer shall provide
engineering studies, including network analysis, to
size the water mains for ultimate development
within the project. This includes detailed water
usage analysis and building plans for Public
Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval
in determining project water requirements and
appropriate water assessment fees.
Water Engineering
Division
7
(MM10-9)
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation meter when the
total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet.
(City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
Water Engineering
8 The property owner shall comply with Rule 15D
of the Water Utilities Rates, Rules, and
Regulations and pay all applicable water
assessment fees.
Water Engineering
9
(MM10-13)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans water
efficient design features including, but not limited
to (as applicable to the type of development at
issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals,
automatic on and off water faucets, and water
efficient appliances.
Resource Efficiency
10
(MM10-14)
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first, the property
owner/developer shall indicate on plans
installation of a separate irrigation lines and use
recycled water when it becomes available. All
irrigation systems shall be designed so that they
will function properly with recycled water. The
property owner/developer shall contact the Public
Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division,
for recycled water system requirements and
specific water conservation measures to be
incorporated into the building and landscape
construction plans.
Water Engineering
11
(MM10-17)
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit,
Development
Services
whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall
review the location of each project to determine if
it is located within an area served by deficient
drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan
of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove
Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the
project will increase stormwater flows beyond
those programmed in the appropriate master plan
drainage study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient storm
drain system or will create a deficiency in an
existing storm drain, the property owner/developer
shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the
impact to adequately serve the area to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City
Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer
shall be required to install the drainage facilities,
as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the
impacts of the proposed development based upon
the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones
of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East
Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary
Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of
public improvements by the City or final Building
and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure,
whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property
owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if
adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the
City Engineer, which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, construction, or a combination
thereof.
12
(MM 10-20)
Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for
import/export plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for demolition plans), the
property owner/developer shall submit a
Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if
determined to be necessary by the Public Works
Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or
Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall
include identification of off-site locations for
material export from the project and options for
disposal of excess material. These options may
include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a
broker or contractor, sale to a project in the
vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared
landfill, with attempts made to move it within
Orange County. The property owner/developer
shall offer recyclable building materials, such as
asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private
Streets and Sanitation
Planning Division
Traffic and
Transportation
firms or public agencies for use in construction of
other projects, if all cannot be reused on the
project site.
13
(MM10-23)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Relocate Southern California Edison
transmission line underground on
Katella Avenue from west of the Union
Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850
feet).
• Relocate Southern California Edison
communication line underground on
Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to
east of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet
west of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• Relocate distribution circuits
underground on Katella Avenue from
Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State
College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim
Way to State College Boulevard (1,500
feet).
• Relocation a distribution circuit
underground on Orangewood Avenue
from State College Boulevard to west of
the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Electrical
Engineering
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Lewis
Street from Katella Avenue to Gene
Autry Way (950 feet).
• Relocate a distribution circuit
underground on Douglas Street from
Katella Avenue to Cerritos Avenue
(1,000 feet).
14
(MM10-25)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion
of the underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System as determined
by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules,
Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of
Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations or another financial mechanism
approved by the City. The underground electrical
service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
• Two new distribution duct banks on
Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to
Lewis Street (800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella
Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell
Avenue (2,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on State
College Boulevard from Cerritos
Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on
Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the
Santa Ana River (4,800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from Haster Street to the
east side of I-5 (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene
Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on
Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
Electrical
Engineering
(3,400 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Lewis
Street and Santa Cruz Street from
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue
(3,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on the east
side of the Angel Stadium parking lot
from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57
(2,000 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road
from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue (4,000 feet).
15 Prior to issuance of the grading permit and right-of-
way construction permit for the storm drain and
sewer, whichever occurs first, a Save Harmless
agreement in-lieu of an Encroachment Agreement is
required to be executed, approved by the City and
recorded by the applicant on the property for any
storm drains connecting to a City storm drain.
Development
Services
16 The property owner shall submit a final drainage
report and project improvement plans that
incorporate the required drainage improvements and
the mechanisms proposed in the Drainage Report.
No offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after
grading operations or perimeter wall construction.
Development
Services
17 The property owner/developer shall submit plans
documenting that the design of all aboveground
structures (with the exception of parking
structures) shall be at least one foot higher that the
100-year flood zone, where applicable, unless
otherwise required by the City Engineer. All
structures below this level shall be floodproofed to
prevent damage to property or harm to people.
Development
Services
18 The OWNER shall demonstrate that coverage has
been obtained under California’s General Permit for
Stormwater Discharges Associated with
Construction Activity by providing a copy of the
Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water
Resources Control Board and a copy of the
subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste
Discharge Identification (WDID) number. The
owner shall prepare and implement a Stormwater
Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). A copy of the
current SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and
be available for City review on request.
Development
Services
19 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each
development project, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install the sanitary
sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer,
to mitigate the impacts of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer
study for the Platinum Triangle.
Development
Services
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
20
(MM2-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence that high-solids or water-based low
emissions paints and coatings are utilized in the
design and construction of buildings, in
compliance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s regulations. This
information shall be denoted on the project plans
and specifications. Additionally, the property
owner/developer’s shall specify the use of high-
volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand
application. Air-atomized spray techniques shall
not be permitted. Plans shall also show that
property owner/developers shall construct/build
with materials that do not require painting, or use
prepainted construction materials, to the extent
feasible.
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
21
(MM2-6)
The property owner/architect shall submit energy
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with
the performance approach to the California Energy
Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that
shows each new structure exceeds the applicable
Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a
minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building
permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as
vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof
temperatures significantly during the
summer and; therefore, reduce the energy
requirement for air conditioning. Examples
of energy efficient building materials and
suppliers can be found at the following
website: http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or
other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-
colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous
pavement, for all roadways and walkways
not within the public right-of-way, to
minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its
surrounding environment. Examples of
Building Division
cool pavement materials are available at:
http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html
or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the
existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy
efficient appliances (e.g., EnergyStar®
appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering
window coatings or double-paned
windows.
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all
commercial structures encompassing over
50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within
close proximity to the building structure to
reduce heat load and resulting energy
usage at residential, commercial, and
office.
22
(MM5-1)
Prior to approval of street improvement plans for
any project-related roadway widening, the City
shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design
project acoustical features that will limit traffic
noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are
below the City’s noise ordinance. These
treatments shall be noted on the street
improvement plans to the satisfaction of the
Planning Department and may include, but are not
limited to, the replacement of windows and doors
at existing residences with acoustically rated
windows and doors.
Development
Services
Building Division
23
(MM10-4)
Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for
each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the
sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City
Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade
structures of the proposed development based upon
the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum
Triangle. Where requested by the City Engineer,
sewer improvements shall be constructed with
larger than recommended diameter to maintain the
surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert
elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above
the hydraulic grade line elevation of the surcharge
levels when they are above the pipe crown.
Public Works
Department,
Development
Services Division
24
(MM5-2)
The project property owner/developers shall
submit a final acoustical report prepared to the
Building Division
satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report
shall show that the development will be sound-
attenuated against present and projected noise
levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter,
stationary sources (e.g., industrial, commercial,
stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior
noise standards as follows:
a) The report shall demonstrate that the
proposed residential design will result in
compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior
noise levels, as required by the California
Building Code and California Noise
Insulation Standards (Title 24 and 25 of the
California Code of Regulations).
b) The report shall demonstrate that the
Proposed Project residential design shall
minimize nighttime awakening from
stadium event noise and train horns such
that interior single-event noise levels are
below 81 dBA Lmax.
The property owner/developer shall submit the
noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for
review and approval. Upon approval by the City,
the project acoustical design features shall be
incorporated into construction of the Proposed
Project.
25
(MM5-5)
To reduce noise and vibration impacts from the
impact pile driver, the construction contractor
shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast
piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct
cast-in-place piles for a pile-supported transfer
slab foundation system. This alternative
construction method would reduce the duration
necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or
eliminate the need to use pile drivers altogether.
Proof of compliance with this measure shall be
submitted to the Planning Department in the form
of a letter from the construction contractor.
Building Division
26
(MM7-1)
Plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have
fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim
Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed
by the property owner/developer prior to each
final Building and Zoning inspection.
Fire Department
27
(MM7-2)
The property owner/developer shall pay the Public
Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time,
for fire facilities and equipment impact fees
identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter
17.36.
Fire Department
28
(MM7-3)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
to the Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval for the purpose of incorporating safety
measures in the project design including
implementation of Ordinance 6016 and the concept
of crime prevention through environmental design
(i.e., building design, circulation, site planning and
lighting of parking structure and parking areas).
Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking
structures (for the police helicopter). Minimum
size for numbers shall be four feet in height and
two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall
be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches
apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to
the parking structure and shall face the street to
which the structure is addressed.
Police Department
29
(MM7-4)
For a parking structure, the property
owner/developer shall submit plans to the
Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval indicating the provision of closed circuit
monitoring and recording or other substitute
security measures as may be approved by the
Anaheim Police Department. Said measures shall
be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning
inspections.
Police Department
30
(MM7-5)
The property owner/developer shall submit design
plans that shall include parking lots and parking
structures with controlled access points to limit
ingress and egress if determined to be necessary
by the Anaheim Police Department, and shall be
subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim
Police Department.
Police Department
31
(MM7-9)
The property owner/developer shall pay the school
impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of
the Anaheim Union High School District and
Anaheim City School District in compliance with
Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section
65995 [b][3] as amended).
Community
Development
Building Division
32
(MM9-4)
The property owner/developer shall pay the
appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees,
Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
Traffic and
Transportation
which have been established.
33
(MM9-5)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan.
Traffic and
Transportation
34
(MM 9-6)
Any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak
hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic
Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property
owner/developers shall prepare traffic
improvement phasing analyses to identify when
the improvements identified in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic
Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010
(Appendix F of this SEIR) shall be designed and
constructed. The Development Agreement
Conditions of Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to implement traffic
improvements as identified in the project traffic
study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as
defined by the City’s General Plan, based on
thresholds of significance, performance standards
and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339,
Orange County Congestion Management Program
and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study
Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses
will specify the timing, funding, construction and
fair share responsibilities for all traffic
improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory
levels of service within the City of Anaheim and
surrounding jurisdictions. The Development
Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require
the property owner/developer to construct, bond
for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary
circulation system improvements, as determined
by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager,
unless alternative funding sources have been
identified.
Traffic and
Transportation
35
(MM9-7)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners
/developers will analyze to determine when the
intersection improvements shall be constructed,
subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation
Traffic and
Transportation
Measure 9-6 of Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
106C.
The improvement phasing analyses will specify
the timing, funding, construction and fair-share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements
necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service
within the City of Anaheim and surrounding
jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-share calculations
shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-
way, and construction costs, unless alternative
funding sources have been identified to help pay
for the improvement.
The Development Agreement Conditions of
Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter
into a funding agreement for necessary circulation
system improvements, as determined by the City
Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless
alternative funding sources have been identified.
36
(MM9-8)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions
shall be taken in cooperation with the City of
Orange:
a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis
shall identify any impacts created by the
project on facilities within the City of
Orange. The fair-share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
shall be calculated in this analysis.
b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the
cost of the project’s fair-share
responsibility in cooperation with the City
of Orange.
c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of
Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City of
Anaheim shall hold the amount received in
trust, and then, once a mutually agreed
upon joint program is executed by both
cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate
the fair-share contribution to traffic
mitigation programs that result in improved
traffic flow at the impacted locations, via
an agreement mutually acceptable to both
cities.
d) The City shall work with the City of
Traffic and
Transportation
Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure the
fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial
and intersection impacts in the City of
Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible.
37
(MM9-9)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a
regional transportation agency has not already
programmed and funded the warranted
improvements to the impacted freeway mainline
or freeway ramp locations, property
owners/developers and the City will take the
following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s
proportionate impact on the specific
freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp
locations and its fair share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts
based on thresholds of significance,
performance standards and methodologies
utilized in SEIR No. 339 and established in
the Orange County Congestion
Management Program and City of
Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines.
b) The City shall estimate the cost of the
project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
Traffic and
Transportation
38
(MM9-10)
Prior to the approval of a building permit the
property owner/developer shall pay the identified
fair-share responsibility as determined by the City
as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow on the
impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City.
Traffic and
Transportation
39
(MM9-11)
Prior to approval of the first building permit the
property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer
for dedication (with subordination of easements),
including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent
to their property as shown in the Circulation
Element of the Anaheim General Plan and
consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of
impacts generated by the project.
Traffic and
Transportation
40
(MM9-14)
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for
each building, the property owner/developer shall
pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment
Fees, Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and
Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City
Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given
for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts
which have been established.
Traffic and
Transportation
41
(MM9-15)
The property owner/developer shall meet with the
Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine
whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed
adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is
required, it shall be placed in a location that least
impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the
Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the
approval of the Orange County Transportation
Authority (OCTA).
Traffic and
Transportation
Orange County
Transportation
Authority (OCTA)
42
(MM10-7)
Landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance
with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape
Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in
compliance with the State of California Model
Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the
project are the following:
• Use of water-conserving landscape plant
materials wherever feasible;
• Use of vacuums and other equipment to
reduce the use of water for wash down of
exterior areas;
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment
including low flush toilets and urinals;
• Use of self-closing valves for drinking
fountains;
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as
drip irrigation and automatic systems
which use moisture sensors;
• Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and
urinals;
• Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at
night, when evaporation rates are lowest;
• Water-efficient dishwashers, clothes
Resource Efficiency
Development
Services
washers, and other water using
appliances;
• Cooling tower recirculating system;
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in
irrigation system;
• Use of waterway recirculation systems;
• Provide information to the public in
conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
• Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and
washdown when it becomes available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and
building plans, the applicant shall identify which
of these measures have been incorporated into the
plans.
43
(MM 10-12)
Submitted landscape plans for all residential,
office and commercial landscaping shall
demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant
materials pursuant to the publication entitled
“Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by
the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000.
Resource Efficiency
44
(MM10-18)
The property owner/developer shall submit project
plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the
Public Works Department for review and approval
to ensure that the plans comply with AB939, and
the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the
County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated
Waste Management Plans as administered by the
City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan
shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain
in full effect as required by the Street and
Sanitation Division and may include, at its
discretion, the following plan components:
• Detailing the locations and design of on-
site recycling facilities.
• Participating in the City of Anaheim’s
“Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by
the City or governing agency.
• Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially
in retail areas) by providing adequate space
and centralized locations for collection and
bailing.
• Providing trash compactors for non-
recyclable materials whenever feasible to
reduce the total volume of solid waste and
Streets and Sanitation
number of trips required for collection.
• Providing on-site recycling receptacles
accessible to the public to encourage
recycling for all businesses, employees,
and patrons where feasible.
• Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies
with federal, state, and city regulations.
45
(MM 10-21)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
showing that each structure will exceed the State
Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential
Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California
Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent
and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public
Utilities Department Business and Community
Programs Division. This consultation shall take
place during project design in order to review Title
24 measures that are incorporated into the project
design energy efficient practices and allow
potential system alternatives such as thermal
energy storage air-conditioning, lighting, and
building envelope options. Plans submitted for
building permits shall show the proposed energy
efficiencies and systems alternatives.
Business and
Community
Programs
46
(MM 10-22)
The property owner/developer shall indicate on
plans energy-saving practices that will be
implemented with the project in compliance with
Title 24, which may include the following:
• High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS
(computer) control.
• Variable Air Volume (VAV) air
distribution.
• Outside air (100 percent) economizer
cycle.
• Staged compressors or variable speed
drives to flow varying thermal loads.
• Isolated HVAC zone control by
floors/separable activity areas.
• Specification of premium-efficiency
electric motors (i.e., compressor motors,
air-handling units, and fan-coil units).
• Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate
spaces.
• Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
• Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
• Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit
Business and
Community
Programs
signage.
• Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts
where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
• Use of lighting power controllers in
association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity
discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots.
• Consideration of thermal energy storage air
conditioning for spaces or facilities that
may require air-conditioning during
summer, day-peak periods.
• Consideration for participation in
Advantage Services Programs such as:
o New construction design review, in
which the City cost-shares
engineering for up to $15,000 for
design of energy efficient buildings
and systems.
o New Construction – Cash
incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per
kWh saved for each measure and up
to $200,000 per facility for efficiency
that exceed Title 24 requirements.
o Green Building Program – Offers
accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees
and free technical assistance.
• Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons
per flush [gpf] or less).
• Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0
gpf to 0.25 gpf).
• Use of weather-based irrigation controllers
for outdoor irrigation.
Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in
outdoor landscaping.
47
(MM 10-24)
The property owner/developer shall submit plans
for review and approval which shall ensure that
buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency
Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24,
Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code)
by a minimum of 10 percent.
Business and
Community
Programs
48
(MM10-26)
Prior to issuance of each building permit or
grading permit, the property owner/developer shall
provide an electrical load analysis to the City of
Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD).
Electrical
Engineering
The analysis shall include a load schedule and
maximum electrical coincident demand. Should
the property owner/developer’s load analysis
result in a contributed load forecasted to exceed 20
MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the
electrical system currently serving the Platinum
Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction
of a new electrical substation within the Platinum
Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees for the electrical substation
will be assessed in accordance with the Electric
Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial
mechanism approved by the City design features.
49 Prior to approval of permits for improvement
plans, the property owner/developer shall
coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish
electrical service requirements and submit electric
system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans,
elevation plans, and related technical drawings and
specifications.
Electrical
Engineering
50
The proposed project shall comply with all State
Energy Insulation Standards and City of Anaheim
codes in effect at the time of application for
building permits. (Commonly referred to as Title
24, these standards are updated periodically to
allow consideration and possible incorporation of
new energy efficiency technologies and methods.)
Electrical
Engineering
51 Prior to approval of permits for improvement
plans, the property owner/developer shall
coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish
electrical service requirements and submit electric
system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans,
elevation plans, and related technical drawings and
specifications.
Electrical
Engineering
52 That a private water system with separate water
service for fire protection and domestic water shall
be provided inside the development.
Water Engineering
53 That all backflow equipment shall be located
above ground outside of the street setback area in
a manner fully screened from all public streets and
alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently
installed in a vault will have to be brought up to
current standards. Any other large water system
equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of
Water Engineering
the Water Engineering Division outside of the
street setback area in a manner fully screened from
all public streets and alleys. Said information shall
be specifically shown on plans and approved by
Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control
Inspector.
54 That all requests for new water services or fire
lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or
abandonments of existing water services and fire
lines, shall be coordinated through Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Water Engineering
55 That this is a non-individual homeowner project
with a landscaping area (including pools or other
Water features) exceeding 2,500 square feet, a
Landscape Documentation Package and a
Certification of Completion are required and a
separate irrigation meter shall be installed in
compliance with Chapter 10.19 of Anaheim
municipal Code and Ordinance No. regarding
water conservation.
Water Engineering
56 That landscaping shall be provided around the
above ground large meter or fire service to shield
from street view.
Water Engineering
57 That all existing water services and fire services
shall conform to current Water Services Standards
Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line
that does not meet current standards shall be
upgraded if continued use is necessary or
abandoned if the existing service is no longer
needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible
for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water
service or fire line.
Water Engineering
58 Prior to Approval of Water Improvement Plan the
Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the
City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large
domestic above-ground water meters and fire
hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement
around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad (ii)
a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water
service mains and service laterals all to the
Water Engineering
satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division.
The easements shall be granted on the Water
Engineering Division of the Public Utilities
Department’s standard water easement deed. The
easement deeds shall include language that
requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring
any special surface improvements, other than
asphalt paving, including but not limited to
colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete,
decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that
becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or
replacement of City owned water facilities.
Provisions for the repair, replacement and
maintenance of all surface improvements other
than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of
the Owner and included and recorded in the
Master CC & Rs for the project.
59 Prior to First Submittal of Water Improvement
Plans the developer/owner shall submit a water
system master plan, including a hydraulic
distribution network analysis, for Public Utilities
Water Engineering review and approval. The
master plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the
proposed on-site water system to meet the
project’s water demands and fire protection
requirements.
Water Engineering
60 Prior to Applying for the First Water Meter or Fire
Service or First Submittal of the Water
Improvement Plans the developer/owner shall
submit to the Public Utilities Water Engineering
an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and
maximum day and peak hour water demands for
the project. This information will be used to
determine the adequacy of the existing water
system to provide the estimated water demands.
Any off-site water system improvements required
to serve the project shall be done in accordance
with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates,
Rules, and Regulations.
Water Engineering
61 Prior to Approval of the Water Improvement Plan,
water improvement plans shall be submitted to the
Water Engineering Division for approval and a
performance bond in the amount approved by the
City Engineer and from approved City Attorney
shall be posted with the City of Anaheim.
Water Engineering
62 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any
special surface improvements, other than asphalt
paving, within any right-of-way, public utility
easement or City easement area including but not
limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers,
stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or
landscaping that becomes damaged during any
excavation, repair or replacement of City owned
water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all
said special surface improvements shall be
included in the recorded Master C,C & R’s for the
project and the City easement deeds.
Water Engineering
63 Applicant shall contact Water Engineering for
reclaimed water system requirements and specific
water conservation measures to be incorporated
into the building and landscape construction plans.
Water Engineering
64 A minimum of two connections to public water
mains and water looping inside the project are
required.
Water Engineering
65 The following minimum horizontal clearances
shall be maintained between proposed water main
and other facilities:
• 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-
to-outside wall) from sanitary sewer mains
and laterals
• 5-feet minimum separation from all other
utilities, including storm drains, gas, and
electric
• 3 or 6-feet minimum separation from curb
face
Water Engineering
66 No public water main or public water facilities
shall be installed in alleys, paseo areas or private
streets.
Water Engineering
67 No public water mains or laterals shall be installed
under parking stalls or parking lots.
Water Engineering
68 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the
entrances of parking lots/structures and located in
other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’
x 1’ in overall size, with white background and
black 2” lettering.
Police Department
69 All entrances to parking areas should be posted
with appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C. to
Police Department
assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owner’s/manager’s request.
70 That curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be
painted red to prohibit parallel parking in the drive
aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled
on building plans.
Traffic and
Transportation
71 That prior to issuance of building permits, plans
shall specifically indicate that all vehicular ramps
and grades conform to all applicable Engineering
Standards.
Traffic and
Transportation
72 That prior to issuance of the a building permit for
the parking structure, plans shall demonstrate that
at-grade ducts and overhead pipes shall not
encroach in the parking space areas or required
vehicle clearance areas.
Traffic and
Transportation
73 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
final map shall be submitted to and approved by the
City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and
the Orange County Surveyor for technical review
and that all applicable conditions of approval have
been complied with and then shall be filed in the
Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Development
Services
74 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall submit to the Public Works Department,
Development Services Division street improvement
plans for the work on Katella Avenue, Lewis Street,
and connector street “A” and “B” including but not
limited to curb and gutter, sidewalk and landscape,
storm drain, and sewer facilities, and traffic signals.
The landscape and irrigation improvement plans
shall be prepared in accordance with the Public
Works Landscape and Irrigation Manual for Public
Street and Highway.
Development
Services
75 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall post a security to guarantee the construction
of public improvements, including storm drain,
water, electrical and sewer, in an amount approved
by the City Engineer and in a form approved by
the City Attorney. The improvements shall be
constructed and operational prior to final
building and zoning inspections.
Development
Services
76 That prior to the issuance of the first building
permit, the property owner/developer shall enter
into a reimbursement agreement with the property
owner/developer of the Platinum Vista project,
Traffic and
Transportation
subject to the approval of the City Engineer, to
provide for cost sharing of the construction of the
public Connector Street between Lewis Street and
Katella Avenue.
77 That prior to the approval of the final subdivision
map or issuance of a building permit, whichever
occurs first, the property owner/developer shall
pay the identified fair share responsibility as
determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation
Measures 9-7 and 9-8 of MMP 106C. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair
share contribution to traffic mitigation programs
that result in improved traffic flow, via an
agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City. These improvements consist of any potential
mitigation measures identified in the updated
traffic study.
Traffic and
Transportation
78 The Public Park recreation amenities shall be
designed to the satisfaction of Community
Services Department.
Community Services
79 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the
final map shall be submitted to and approved by the
City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and
the Orange County Surveyor for technical review
and that all applicable conditions of approval have
been complied with and then shall be filed in the
Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Development
Services
80 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the developer
shall post a security to guarantee the construction
of public works improvements in an amount
approved by the City Engineer and in a form
approved by the City Attorney.
Development
Services
ON-GOING DURING GRADING AND CONSTRUCTION
81
(MM 2-1)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring contractors to implement the
following measures to reduce construction-related
emissions; however, the resultant value is
expected to remain significant.
a) The contractor shall ensure that all
construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained in accordance
with the manufacturer’s recommendations
to reduce operational emissions.
b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as
identified by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, off-road
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
construction equipment with higher air
pollutant emissions standards for
equipment greater than 50 horsepower,
based on manufacturer’s availability.
c) The contractor shall utilize existing power
sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel
generators rather than temporary diesel-
power generators, where feasible.
82
(MM 2-2)
The property owner/developer shall implement the
following measures in addition to the existing
requirements for fugitive dust control under South
Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403
to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. To
assure compliance, the City shall verify
compliance that these measures have been
implemented during normal construction site
inspections. The measures to be implemented are
listed below:
a) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall re-establish ground cover on the
construction site through seeding and
watering as quickly as possible to achieve
minimum control efficiency for PM10 of 5
percent.
b) During all grading activities, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall apply chemical soil stabilizers Pave to
on-site haul roads to achieve control
efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared
to travel on unpaved, untreated roads.
c) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall phase grading
to prevent the susceptibility of large areas
to erosion over extended periods of time.
d) The property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall schedule
activities to minimize the amount of
exposed excavated soil during and after the
end of work periods.
e) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall sweep streets with Rule
1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum
units on a daily basis if silt is carried over
to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs
as a result of hauling.
f) During active demolition and debris
removal and grading, the property
South Coast Air
Quality Management
District
Public Works
Department
Building Division
owner/developer’s construction contractor
shall suspend demolition and grading
operations when wind speeds exceed 25
miles per hour to achieve an emissions
control efficiency for PM10 under worst-
case wind conditions of 98 percent.
g) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-
inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt, sand,
soil, or other loose materials and tarp
materials with a fabric cover or other
suitable means to achieve a control
efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent. an
h) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall water exposed ground
surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of
every three hours on the construction site
to achieve an emissions reduction control
efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.
i) During active demolition and debris
removal, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall apply water to
disturbed soils at the end of each day to
achieve an emission control efficiency for
PM10 of 10 percent.
j) During scraper unloading and loading, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall ensure that actively
disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil
moisture content of 12 percent by use of a
moveable sprinkler system or water truck
to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of
69 percent.
k) During all construction activities, the
property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds
on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles
per hour to achieve a control efficiency for
PM10 of 57 percent.
83
(MM5-7)
Ongoing during grading, demolition, and
construction, the property owner/developer shall
be responsible for requiring contractors to
implement the following measures to limit
construction-related noise:
a) Noise generated by construction, shall be
limited by the property owner/developer to
60 dBA along the property boundaries,
Building Division
Development
Services
before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as
governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure
Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment
that produces noise levels noticeably above
general construction noise levels to the
hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
All internal combustion engines on all of the
construction equipment shall be properly outfitted
with well maintained muffler systems.
84 Through specific study of this project site, by a
certified archaeologist, it has been determined that
no known cultural resources are located in this
area. However, should artifacts be uncovered
during grading or excavation, the developer shall
have a certified archaeologist ensure that the
following actions are implemented:
a) that the project shall be temporarily halted or
work redirected to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of artifacts if
potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If
artifacts are uncovered and determined to be
significant, the archaeological observer shall
determine appropriate actions in cooperation with
the City for exploration and/or salvage;
b) Specimens that are collected prior to or during
the grading process shall be donated to an
appropriate educational or research institution;
c) Any archaeological work at the project site shall
be conducted under the direction of the certified
archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered
during grading operations when the archaeological
observer is not present, grading shall be diverted
around the area until the observer can survey the
area; and
d) A final report detailing the findings and
disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to
the City Engineer. Upon completion of the
grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as
to when the final report will be submitted
Building Division
Development
Services
ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES
85
(MM5-8)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to properly
maintain and tune all construction equipment to
minimize noise emissions.
Building Division
86
(MM5-9)
The property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to locate all
stationary noise sources (e.g., generators,
compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied
noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible.
Building Division
87
(MM5-10)
Material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment
servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set
forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code,
Section 6.70.
Building Division
PRIOR TO APPROVAL AND ON-GOING DURING CONSTRUCTION
88
(MM10-2)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass
area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District
(OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are
making other improvements, the City and/or
property owner/developer shall coordinate with
the OCSD to ensure that all improvements and
construction schedules are coordinated.
Development
Services
89
(MM10-5)
Prior to the approval and ongoing during
construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass
area(s) where OCSD will be upsizing trunk lines
and/or are making other improvements, the City
and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD
to ensure that backflow prevention devices are
installed by OCSD at the lateral connections to
prevent surcharge flow from entering private
properties.
Streets and Sanitation
Orange
County Sanitation
District
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
90
(MM 2-5)
In accordance with the timing required by the
Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later
than prior to the first final Building and Zoning
inspection, the property owner/developer shall
implement the following measures to reduce long-
term operational CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10
emissions:
• Traffic lane improvements and
signalization as outlined in the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft
Traffic Study Report, Parsons
Brinckerhoff, August 2010 and Master Plan
of Arterial Highways (MPAH ) shall be
implemented as required by the Traffic and
Transportation Manager.
The property owner/contractor shall place bus
Traffic and
Transportation
benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic
and Transportation Manager at locations along any
site frontage routes as needed.
91 A parking management plan shall be submitted for
review and approval by the City Engineer prior to
the project receiving a certificate of occupancy.
Planning Division &
Traffic and
Transportation
92 Fire lanes shall be posted with “No Parking Any
Time.” Said information shall be specifically
shown on plans submitted for building permits.
Traffic and
Transportation
93 That prior to City acceptance of the public right-
of-way improvements for Katella Avenue, Lewis
Street, and for the public Connector Street
identified in the Final Site Plan, said streets shall
be posted with “No Stopping Any Time” signs and
associated red curbs, except, in the locations
where the Connector Street is improved with
designated parking stalls and designated turn-out
areas for loading and unloading. Such signs shall
be shown on street improvement plans submitted
by the property owner/developer for the review
and approval by the Public Works Department.
The location of such signs shall be reviewed and
approved by the City Traffic Engineering
Manager. The property owner/developer shall be
responsible for all costs associated with the
installation of such signs.
Traffic and
Transportation
94 Prior to release of posted securities, the public
improvements shall be constructed by the
developer and accepted by Construction Services
prior to final building and zoning inspections.
Development
Services
95 The developer shall install accessible curb access
ramps with truncated domes at the intersection of
Lewis Street and Connector street “B” and at the
intersection of Connector streets “A” and “B” at
the parking garage access, in conformance with
Public Works Standard Detail 111-3.
Development
Services
96 The developer shall improve the streets as follows:
1) improve Katella Avenue and Lewis Street per the
Platinum Triangle Implementation Master Plan or
as approved by the City Engineer, 2) improve the
interior Connector streets “A” and “B” per the
Connector and Connector Streets requirements of
the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and
the Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan.
Development
Services
97 The property owner/developer shall submit Building Division
(MM 5-3) evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during a stadium event will be provided
to all future tenants in the Stadium District.
98
(MM 5-4)
The property owner/developer shall submit
evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning
Director that occupancy disclosure notices
regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be
elevated during Stadium nearby venue events.
Building Division
PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL
99 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for
Platinum Gateway and/or Platinum Vista, any existing
structures located within the ultimate right-of-way for
connector streets “A” and “B”, Katella Avenue and
Lewis Street shall be demolished.
Development
Services
100 The property owner/developer shall irrevocably
offer for dedication (with subordination of
easements), including necessary construction
easements, 1) the ultimate arterial highway
right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property (Katella
Avenue and Lewis Street) as shown in the
Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan or as
approved by the City Engineer, and 2) the ultimate
right-of-way for the interior Connector streets “A”
and “B” per the Connector and Connector Streets
requirements of the Platinum Triangle Master
Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts
generated by the project.
Development
Services
101 In the event that the owner of Parcel 2 of Tentative
Tract 17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Vista" project (APN 082-26-127 and
082-26-128), requires to construct Connector
Street “A” and/or “B” improvements, the property
owner/developer shall cooperate with “Platinum
Vista” to offer Connector Street “A” and/or “B”
lying within the boundary of Parcel 1 of Tentative
Tract 17494 as an irrevocable offer of dedication
to the City of Anaheim for public road, public
utilities and other public purposes.
Development
Services
102 In the event that the owner of Parcel 2 of Tentative
Tract 17494, commonly known as the proposed
"Platinum Vista" project (APN 082-26-127 and
082-26-128), requires to construct a turn-around
area on the north terminus of Connector Street
“A”, the property owner/developer shall cooperate
with “Platinum Vista” to grant a temporary
Development
Services
easement/right of entry for the portion of the turn-
around lying within the boundary of Parcel 1 and
Lot “A” of Tentative Tract 17494. The geometry
of the temporary turn-around shall be reviewed
and approved by City Engineer and the Fire
Department.
103 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the
Subdivision Section and approved by the City
Attorney's office. The covenant shall include
provisions for maintenance of private facilities such
as private sewer, concrete paver covered street
sections, private storm drain improvements,
temporary turn-around areas, if any, and backflow
prevention devices such as flap gates; compliance
with approved Water Quality Management Plan;
and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance
responsibilities shall include all drainage devices,
concrete pavers within the Connector public road,
sewer system, gates, parkway landscaping and
irrigation on Katella Avenue and Lewis Street,
Connector public road STREET “A” and STREET
“B”, all lettered lots, and any private street name
signs. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently
with the final map.
Development
Services
104 The vehicular access rights to Katella Avenue and
Lewis Street shall be released and relinquished to
the City of Anaheim.
Development
Services
105 The vehicular access rights to connector public road
STREET “A” and STREET “B”, except at the
private street openings, shall be released and
relinquished to the City of Anaheim.
Development
Services
106 The legal property owner shall execute a
Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the
City Attorney, to complete the required public
improvements at the legal property owner’s
expense. Said agreement shall be submitted to the
Public Works Department, Subdivision Section
approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer.
In lieu of a Subdivision Agreement, an amended
Development Agreement can be utilized to satisfy
this condition of approval if the required terms are
included therein.
Development
Services
GENERAL
107
(MM7-6)
Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim
Police Department of Anaheim Traffic
Management Center (TMC) personnel are required
Police
Traffic Management
to provide temporary traffic control services for
the project, the property owner/developer shall
reimburse the City, on a fairshare basis, if
applicable, for reasonable costs associated with
such services
108
(MM10-19)
Ongoing during project operations, the following
practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the
property owner/developer:
• Usage of recycled paper products for
stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
• Recovery of materials, such as aluminum
and cardboard.
• Collection of office paper for recycling.
Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser
printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap
metal for recycling or recovery.
Streets and Sanitation
109 Ongoing during business operations and in
accordance with the Development Requirements
and Maintenance Obligations, OWNER shall be
responsible for restoring any special surface
improvements other than asphalt paving within the
right-of-way, City water easements, Public Utility
easements, private roads, alleys and driveways,
including but not limited to colored concrete,
stamped concrete, bricks, pavers, concrete, walls,
or landscaping that becomes damaged during any
excavation, repair or replacement of any City
water facility. Provisions for maintenance of all
said special surface improvements shall be
included in the recorded Master CC&R’s for the
project.
Water Engineering
110 The Planning Director has the authority to grant
the modification of the timing of any of the
conditions of approval, provided said modification
does not result in any increase in environmental
impacts for which sufficient mitigation cannot be
provided. Any request for such modification shall
be in writing and shall clearly identify the reason
for the modification. Appeal of such decision
shall be provided pursuant to Section 18.60.135
(Appeals – Planning Director Decisions) of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
Planning Division
111 The subject property shall be developed
substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by
the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Division
Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1
(Overall Site Plan including Platinum Gateway
and Platinum Vista) Exhibit No. 2 (Platinum
Gateway Site Plan), Exhibit No. 3 (Tentative Tract
Map), Exhibit No. 4, Floor and Unit Plans),
Exhibit No. 5 (Garage Plans), Exhibit No. 6
(Elevations), Exhibit No. 7 (Site Section), Exhibit
No. 8 (Landscape Plans and Materials Legend),
and as conditioned herein.
EXHIBIT “D”
PLATINUM TRIANGLE INTERIM DEVELOPMENT FEES
[See next page.]
EXHIBIT “D-1"
ELECTRIC UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING FEE
Residential Uses $9.92 per unit
The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and the Underground Conversion Program
envision that the public utilities along Katella Avenue, between the State College Boulevard and
Anaheim Way will need to be undergrounded. The City-owned facilities will be undergrounded
using City funds, pursuant to the Rule No. 20 of the City of Anaheim Rates, Rules &
Regulations.
Some of the facilities along Katella Avenue are owned by Southern California Edison
(SCE). Moneys available to underground City-owned facilities may not be used to underground
SCE facilities. The interim fee will collect the funds necessary to underground the SCE lines,
and thereby significantly improve the appearance of the Platinum Triangle.
The cost to underground the SCE lines is estimated at $187,505. These funds will be
collected by imposing an interim fee on the residential units planned in the Platinum Triangle.
The formula for calculating the fee is the following:
Cost to Underground SCE lines = Per-Unit Fee
Number of residential units
The Per-Unit fee is calculated at:
$187,505 = $9.92 per Unit
18,909 Units
EXHIBIT “D-2"
GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSING FEE
Residential Uses: $24.00 per unit
Non-residential Uses: $0.03 per sq. ft.
These fees are intended to recover the costs associated with the Platinum Triangle including the
designation of portions of the Platinum Triangle for mixed use and office development by the General
Plan, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay, the
Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement Form, Zone Reclassifications, all other
associated documents and amendments thereto, and all associated environmental documentation. The fees
are based upon the following calculations:
Costs
Consultant Contract Costs: $670,623 (includes costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
Planning Department Costs: $456,765 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
Public Works Costs: $41,325 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
$1,168,713 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339)
New Development Allowed in the Platinum Triangle
Non-Residential Uses
14,340,522 square feet office development
4,909,682 square feet commercial development
+ 1,500,000 square feet institutional
20,750,204 total square feet non-residential development
Residential Uses
18,909 residential units
x 800 square feet (estimated average unit size)
15,127,200 total square feet of residential development
Total Square Feet
20,750,204 total square feet non-residential development
+ 15,127,200 total square feet of residential development
35,877,404 total square feet of residential and non-residential uses
Fees (to be updated with DSEIR Planning and Public Works Costs)
$1,168,713 costs = $0.03 per square foot
35,877,404 total square feet
Non Residential Uses: $0.03 per square foot
Residential Uses: $24.00 per unit ($0.03 x 800 square feet)
EXHIBIT “D-3"
LIBRARY FACILITIES FEE
Residential Uses $486.77 per unit
The increase of density in the Platinum Triangle to an expected population over 27,000 residents requires
the inclusion of a library facility in the Platinum Triangle. The library facilities fee includes the cost of
the purchase of a 10,000 square foot commercial condominium shell space with 50 assigned parking
spaces as well as FF&E and an opening day collection. The projected project cost for a 10,000 square
foot library facility in the Platinum Triangle is $8,004,000. The individual unit library impact fee for the
Platinum Triangle is now $486.77 per unit.
EXHIBIT "E”
DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS
As a condition of approval of the First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No.
2008-00002 (Development Agreement No. 2008-00002D), the CITY requires OWNER to
undertake and implement the maintenance of certain areas, facilities and improvements to be
constructed in conjunction with the development of the Property. The initial intended use for
the Project is as a multifamily property with apartments for rent. As such, OWNER shall be
responsible for compliance with the Development Requirements and Maintenance
Obligations described below ("Maintenance Obligations"). If the project is ever converted to
a for-sale condominium project, prior to such conversion the owner of the property at that
time ("Current Owner") shall execute and record in the Official Records of the County of
Orange, State of California, a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions
("CC&Rs") in a form satisfactory to the Planning Director and the City Attorney, creating
development requirements and maintenance obligations for an incorporated association
("Association") and establishing a financial mechanism or financial mechanisms to maintain
those areas and facilities (collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Maintenance
Obligations"). Following the formation of the Association, such Association, or an
Assessment District acceptable to the City, shall take over the responsibility for compliance
with the Maintenance Obligations for the overall Project and the Current Owner shall be
relieved therefrom.
The Maintenance Obligations include:
a. Common fences, walls and utility screening devices.
b. Private sewer lines and storm drain lines and facilities, area drains, inlets, manholes
and catch basins, and any appurtenances within the boundaries of the Property that
serve the Project.
c. Private drives and parking, including sidewalks, landscaping, street lighting,
mounted lighting, signage, and striping.
d. Provision for the replacement of any landscaping planted on-site in accordance with
project landscaping plans in a timely manner in the event that landscaping is
removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead.
e. Parkway and street median landscaping and irrigation along the project frontage
including East Katella Avenue and Lewis Street.
f. The Public Park and amenities, such as the park furniture, park benches, play
equipment, trash receptacles and landscape maintenance.
g. All landscape improvement and amenities for the Project on the Final Site Plan
including all trees and tree wells, shrubbery and any and all landscaping.
h. All street furniture not maintained by the public utility companies or by the CITY.
i. Maintenance of on-site signs and all special monumentation within the Project,
including community identification signs and their respective sign easements, if any,
and on-site fountains and art elements.
j. Common or open space areas within the boundaries of the Project.
k. All walkways, pedestrian paths within the boundaries of the Project.
l. Covered on-site storage areas for bicycles, scooters and athletic equipment screened
from public view.
m. Centralized recreational amenities within the boundaries of the Project appropriate to
the population mix in the Project, including pools and spas, barbecue areas, clubhouse
meeting room(s) and workout room(s).
n. Maintenance of internal hardscapes, and other common open spaces or areas, if
applicable.
o. Removal of graffiti within 24 hours’ notice of occurrence.
p. Any special surface improvements other than typical concrete or asphalt paving
within the public right-of-way, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks,
pavers or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or
replacement of public utilities including water, electrical, and sewer facilities within
easements.
q. Enclosed parking structures with mail facilities, trash collection areas, and bicycle
storage, including the squeal-free surface in the parking structure.
r. Trash bins and enclosures within the boundaries of the Project.
s. Trash collection and facilities including the Solid Waste Management Plan for the
project as approved by the CITY, including a sign to be posted in each trash
collection area indicating "No Parking Between the Hours of 7 A.M. and 5 P.M." to
allow sufficient access for the trash bin retrieval vehicle.
t. Maintenance of all security equipment required by the Police Department including
antennas providing radio communication.
u. Provision for the continued maintenance of all automatic fire sprinklers systems and
fire alarm system.
v. Maintenance of private water meters and all associated water line improvements.
w. Prohibit the enclosure of any balconies or patios that are shown as unenclosed on any
approved Final Site Plan.
x. Provision that all parking spaces shall remain open and available for their intended
purpose. No storage, staging or other use of parking stalls shall be permitted.
y. Provision for the property to be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by
providing regular landscape maintenance and removal of trash or debris.
z. Demonstrate that the Current Owner and/or Association is prepared to implement
Treatment Controls Best Management Practices for Water Quality Management Plan;
all non-structural BMP's described in the Project WQMP; and, that an adequate
number of copies for all responsible parties) of the approved Project WQMP are
available on-site.
aa. So long as the Property is maintained and operated for rent, all leases and/or rental
agreements shall contain a provision in a form acceptable to the City Attorney providing
for the waiver and release by tenants of any claims, demands or causes of action against
the Owner or the City of Anaheim, a municipal corporation (which shall be deemed to be
a third party beneficiary) relating to the proximity of the Project and each tenant's
apartment unit to entertainment venues, especially the Angel Stadium, and the potential
for audible noise associated with said entertainment uses.
If the Property is converted to a for-sale condominium project, all agreements for the
purchase and sale of the condominium units shall contain a similar waiver and release in
form acceptable to the City Attorney.
bb. Provision that requires the subscription to a service that provides "automated
emergency notification" to individual residents of the Project (subject to meeting
minimum standards set by the CITY) following expiration of the initial subscription
required to be purchased by the property owner/developer. Provision to require the
maintenance, in a timely manner, of the database of resident phone numbers in
conjunction with the service, and provide appropriate agencies (police, fire, other
emergency responders, as identified by the CITY) with information on how to
activate the notification via the service provider.
cc. Provision that the Current Owner and/or Association shall not charge for "event
parking" for the Honda Center, The Grove of Anaheim or the Angel Stadium unless
approved by the CITY.
dd. Provisions to restrict loitering and any unauthorized sales of t-shirts, tickets and other
merchandise related to events at the adjacent sports and entertainment venues.
ee. Provision that the Current Owner and/or Association shall handle and dispose of all
hazardous materials and wastes during the operation and maintenance of facilities in
accordance with the State codes identified in Mitigation Measure No. 5.4 1 and under
Anaheim Fire Department supervision.
ff. Provision that, in the event that Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim Traffic
Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic
control services in connection with construction or operation of the project, the
Current Owner shall reimburse the CITY, on a fair-share basis, if determined
appropriate by CITY, for reasonable costs associated with such services.
Until such time as an Association is formed, CC&Rs recorded, and an Association has assumed
responsibility to perform the Maintenance Obligations, the OWNER or its successors or assigns
shall be responsible for the performance of such Maintenance Obligations.
If CC&RS are recorded, the covenants and restrictions set forth in the CC&Rs shall
constitute a general scheme for the development, protection and maintenance of the Property
for the benefit of the Current Owner and all residents. Said covenants and restrictions shall be
for the benefit of the Property and shall bind the Current Owner and its successors and
assigns. Such covenants and restrictions shall be a burden upon, and a benefit to, not only the
Current Owner but also its successors and assigns. All of such covenants and restrictions are
intended to be and shall be declared in the CC&Rs to be covenants running with the land or
equitable servitudes upon the land, as the case may be.
The CC&Rs shall provide that termination of the CC&Rs or amendment of any provision
which may negatively impact performance of the Maintenance Obligations shall require the
prior written consent of the CITY. Termination of the CC&Rs shall not release the Current
Owner with regard to the Current Owner's independent obligations in connection with
development and approval of the Project or with regard to obligations and liabilities incurred
prior to such termination or amendment.
EXHIBIT "F”
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT
Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com
ISSUING OFFICE: 1300 Dove Street, Suite 310 • Newport Beach, CA 92660
949 622-5000 • FAX Call for Fax
PRELIMINARY REPORT
Amended
Title Officer: Eric Bowen Title No.: 11-725142114-B-EB Locate No.: CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114 TO: Colliers-Seeley One Park Plaza, Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92614 ATTN: Stephen Schloemer YOUR REFERENCE: 23002976-NP
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 905 and 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California
EFFECTIVE DATE: October 26, 2012, 07:30 A.M.
The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is: CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO
COVERED BY THIS REPORT IS:
A FEE as to Parcel(s) A1 and B1;
AN EASEMENT more fully described below as to Parcel(s) A2 and B2
2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN:
K/L ANAHEIM PROPERTIES I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels A-1 and
A-2 and K/L ANAHEIM PROPERTIES II LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels
B-1 and B-2
3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: SEE EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF MH\LN 12/08/2011
Title No. 11-725142114-B-EB
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
45
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION EXHIBIT "A"
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL A-1: PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN
ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET
MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT SAID GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY AND ALL PURPOSES TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING ABOVE 500 FEET, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE OF SAID PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY, RECORDED September 28, 1973 IN BOOK 10921, PAGE 428 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL A-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND
GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE
OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. PARCEL B-1: PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY. EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY PURPOSE
WHATSOEVER TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY GRANTED HEREIN OR ANY PART THEREOF LYING BETWEEN SAID SURFACE AND FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW SAID SURFACE, AS SET FORTH IN DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A TEXAS CORPORATION, RECORDED December 23, 1977 IN BOOK 12506,
PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS. PARCEL B-2: THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF EASEMENT RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT
GRANT DEED RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. APN: 082-261-23,24
Title No. 11-725142114-B-EB
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
46
CLTA Prelimin
AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE AS FOLLOWS:
1. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the
fiscal year 2012-2013, Assessor’s Parcel Number 082-261-23.
Code Area Number: 01007
1st Installment: $55,118.12 OPEN
2nd Installment: $55,118.12 OPEN
Land: $1,118,149.00
Improvements: $3,006,530.00
Exemption: $0.00
Personal Property: $0.00
2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for the
fiscal year 2012-2013, Assessor’s Parcel Number 082-261-24.
Code Area Number: 01007
1st Installment: $32,494.75 OPEN
2nd Installment: $32,494.75 OPEN
Land: $1,103,615.00
Improvements: $1,495,008.00
Exemption: $0.00
Personal Property: $0.00
3. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5 (Commencing
with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of California.
4. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records.
5. The use and control of cienegas and natural streams of water, if any, naturally upon, flowing across, into
or by the herein described land, and the right of way for and to construct irrigation or drainage ditches
through said land to irrigate or drain adjacent lands, as reserved in the deed from Stearns Ranchos
Company to G.W. Bissett, recorded July 27, 1895 in Book 87, Page 269 of Deeds.
6. Intentionally deleted
7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document.
Granted to: City of Anaheim
Purpose: The installation, maintenance of underground electrical cables, related
equipment
Recorded: December 26, 1973, Book 11039, Page 854, of Official Records
Affects: A portion of Parcel A-1
8. Intentionally deleted
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-B-EB
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
47
CLTA Prelimin
9. A covenant and agreement entitled "Covenant and Agreement"
Executed by: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a general partnership; David E. Sanford; Julius
Fligelman; Harvey Cooper and Mark Ross
In favor of: City of Anaheim
Recorded: April 4, 1978, Book 12621, Page 1581, of Official Records
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon any future owners,
encumbrancers, their successors or assigns, and shall continue in effect until the advisory agency approves
termination.
Affects: Parcel A-1
10. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Party Wall Agreement and Grant of Easement" dated
December 14, 1978, executed by and between Sequoia Pacific Realco, David E. Sanford, Julius Fligelman
and Molly Fligelman as trustees of the Julius Fligelman and Molly Fligelman Revocable Trust, Harvey
Cooper Mark Ross recorded December 29, 1978, Book 12981, Page 1109, of Official Records.
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a document.
Granted to: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a California general partnership
Purpose: Access to utilities
Recorded: December 29, 1978, Book 12981, Page 1144, of Official Records
Affects: A portion of Parcel A-1
12. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Covenant Not To Contest" dated June 13, 2008,
executed by and between K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company and K/L
Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company recorded June 17, 2008, Instrument No.
2008-289659, of Official Records.
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
13. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Development Agreement No. 2008-00002" dated June
24, 2008, executed by and between The City of Anaheim, K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California
limited liability company and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company
recorded July 23, 2008, Instrument No. 2008-351778, of Official Records.
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
14. The effect of a "Notice of Special Tax Lien-City of Anaheim Community Facilities District No. 08-1
(Platinum Triangle)" recorded August 12, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008000383751, of Official Records of
Orange County, State of California.
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-B-EB
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
48
CLTA Prelimin
15. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations secured
thereby
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Dated: November 10, 2010
Trustor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to
Parcels A-1 and A-2 and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited
liability company, as to Parcels B-1 and B-2
Trustee: Fidelity National Title Company
Beneficiary: 1st Enterprise Bank
Loan No.:
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636878, of Official Records
16. An assignment of all moneys due, or to become due as rental or otherwise from said land, to secure
payment of an indebtedness, shown below and upon the terms and conditions therein
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Assigned to: 1rst Enterprise Bank
By: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to
Parcels A-1 and A-2 and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited
liability company, as to Parcels B-1 and B-2
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636879, of Official Records
17. An instrument entitled "Hazardous Substances Certificate and Indemnity Agreement" recorded November
29, 2010 as Instrument/File No. 2010000636880 of Official Records.
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.
18. An unrecorded lease with certain terms, covenants, conditions and provisions set forth therein as disclosed
by the document
Entitled: Subordination, Non-Disturbance and Attornment Agreement and Estoppel
Certificate
Lessor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC
Lessee: Gary Jystad, M.D.
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636881, of Official Records
The present ownership of the leasehold created by said lease and other matters affecting the interest of the
lessee are not shown herein.
An agreement (and the provisions contained therein) which states that said lease is subordinate to the Deed
of Trust
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636878, of Official Records
By document
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636881, of Official Records
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-B-EB
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
49
CLTA Prelimin
19. A financing statement filed in the Office of the County Recorder, showing
Debtor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC
Secured Party: 1rst Enterprise Bank
Date: None Shown
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636882, of Official Records
20. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey of
said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession thereof.
21. Any easements not disclosed by those public records which impart constructive notice as to matters
affecting title to real property and which are not visible and apparent from an inspection of the surface of
said land.
22. Any rights of the parties in possession of a portion of, or all of, said land, which rights are not disclosed
by the public record.
This Company will require, for review, a full and complete copy of any unrecorded agreement, contract,
license and/or lease, together with all supplements, assignments and amendments thereto, before issuing
any policy of title insurance without excepting this item from coverage. The Company reserves the right to
except additional items and/or make additional requirements after reviewing said documents.
23. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, this Company will require for review, the following
documents from the Limited Liability Company named below.
Limited Liability Company: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company
(a) A copy of its operating agreement and any and all amendments, supplements
and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member.
(b) Confirmation that its Articles of Organization (LLC-1), and Certificate of
Amendment (LLC-2), any restated Articles of Organization (LLC-10) and/or
Certificate of Correction (LLC-11) have been filed with the Secretary of State.
(c) If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete
current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member.
(d) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence
satisfactory to the Company, that it was validly formed, is in good standing and
authorized to do business in the state of origin.
(e) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence
satisfactory to the Company, that it has complied with California "doing
business" laws, if applicable.
After review of the requested documents, the Company reserves the right to add additional items or make
additional requirements prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance.
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-B-EB
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
50
CLTA Prelimin
24. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, this Company will require for review, the following
documents from the Limited Liability Company named below.
Limited Liability Company: K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company
(a) A copy of its operating agreement and any and all amendments, supplements
and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate manager or member.
(b) Confirmation that its Articles of Organization (LLC-1), and Certificate of
Amendment (LLC-2), any restated Articles of Organization (LLC-10) and/or
Certificate of Correction (LLC-11) have been filed with the Secretary of State.
(c) If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete
current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member.
(d) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence
satisfactory to the Company, that it was validly formed, is in good standing and
authorized to do business in the state of origin.
(e) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction, evidence
satisfactory to the Company, that it has complied with California "doing
business" laws, if applicable.
After review of the requested documents, the Company reserves the right to add additional items or make
additional requirements prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance.
25. This company will require a statement of information from the parties named below in order to
complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees, or other matters which
do not specifically describe said land, but which, if any do exist, may affect the title or impose liens or
encumbrances thereon. After review of the requested Statement(s) of Information the Company may have
additional requirements before the issuance of any policy of title insurance.
Parties: All parties
(Note: The statement of information is necessary to complete the search and examination of title under this
order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only, and having a completed statement
of information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which appear to involve the parties
but in fact affect another party with the same or similar name. Be assured that the statement of information
is essential and will be kept strictly confidential to this file).
26. The transaction contemplated in connection with this Report is subject to the review and approval of the
Company's Corporate Underwriting Department. The Company reserves the right to add additional items
or make further requirements after such review.
END OF ITEMS
Note 1. The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach the CLTA
Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said land commercial improvements known
as 905 & 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California to an Extended Coverage Loan Policy.
Note 2. There are NO deeds affecting said land, recorded within twenty-four (24) months of the date of this
report.
Note 3. If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real estate agent or
association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed to any person, California
law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding any unlawful restrictions.
Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold face type and may be stamped on the first page of any
document provided or included as a cover page attached to the requested document. Should a party to
this transaction request a copy of any document reported herein that fits this category, the statement is
to be included in the manner described.
Note 4. Wiring instructions for Fidelity National Title Company, Riverside, CA, are as follows:
Receiving Bank: Union Bank of California
(800) 849-6466
Irvine, CA 92614
ABA Routing No.: 122000496
Credit Account Name: Fidelity National Title Company - Major Accounts Payoff/Admin
11870 Pierce St. Suite 100, Riverside, CA 92505
Credit Account No.: 9100586999
Reference No.: 11-725142114
These wiring instructions are for this specific transaction involving the Title Department of the
Newport Beach office of Fidelity National Title Company. These instructions therefore should not be
used in other transactions without first verifying the information with our accounting department. It is
imperative that the wire text be exactly as indicated. Any extraneous information may cause
unnecessary delays in confirming the receipt of funds.
Note 5. Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the presence of
an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an authorized employee of the
insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party service. If the above requirements
cannot be met, please call the company at the number provided in this report.
OWNER'S DECLARATION
The undersigned hereby declares as follows:
1. (Fill in the applicable paragraph and strike the other)
a. Declarant ("Owner") is the owner or lessee, as the case may be, of certain premises located at
____________________________, further described as follows: See Preliminary
Report/Commitment No. __________ for full legal description (the "Land").
b. Declarant is the _____________ of ___________ ("Owner"), which is the owner or lessee, as the
case may be, of certain premises located at _________________________, further described as
follows: See Preliminary Report/Commitment No. ___________ for full legal description (the
"Land").
2. (Fill in the applicable paragraph and strike the other.)
a. During the period of six months immediately preceding the date of this declaration no work has
been done, no surveys or architectural or engineering plans have been prepared, and no materials have
been furnished in connection with the erection, equipment, repair, protection or removal of any
building or other structure on the Land or in connection with the improvement of the Land in any
manner whatsoever.
b. During the period of six months immediately preceding the date of this declaration certain work
has been done and materials furnished in connection with _________ upon the Land in the
approximate total sum of $_________________, but no work whatever remains to be done and no
materials remain to be furnished to complete the construction in full compliance with the plans and
specifications, nor are there any unpaid bills incurred for labor and materials used in making such
improvements or repairs upon the Land, or for the services of architects, surveyors or engineers,
except as follows: ____________________________. Owner, by the undersigned Declarant, agrees
to and does hereby indemnify and hold harmless Fidelity National Title Insurance Company against
any and all claims arising therefrom.
3. Owner has not previously conveyed the Land; is not a debtor in bankruptcy (and if a partnership,
the general partner thereof is not a debtor in bankruptcy); and has not received notice of any pending
court action affecting the title to the Land.
4. Except as shown in the above-referenced Preliminary Report/Commitment, there are no unpaid or
unsatisfied mortgages, deeds of trust, Uniform Commercial Code financing statements, claims of lien,
special assessments, or taxes that constitute a lien against the Land or that affect the Land but have not
been recorded in the public records.
5. The Land is currently in use as ____________; _____________ occupy/occupies the Land; and the
following are all of the leases or other occupancy rights affecting the Land:
______________________________________.
6. There are no other persons or entities that assert an ownership interest in the Land, nor are there
unrecorded easements, claims of easement, or boundary disputes that affect the Land.
7. There are no outstanding options to purchase or rights of first refusal affecting the Land.
This declaration is made with the intention that Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (the
"Company") and its policy issuing agents will rely upon it in issuing their title insurance policies and
endorsements. Owner, by the undersigned Declarant, agrees to indemnify the Company against loss
or damage (including attorneys fees, expenses, and costs) incurred by the Company as a result of any
untrue statement made herein.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration was
executed on ________________ at _____________.
Signature: ______________________________________
END OF NOTES
Final Site Plan
List of Exhibits for The Platinum Vista Project
Exhibit No.
Rendering of Connector Street
Tentative Tract Map
A1 Title Sheet
A1.0 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A1.2 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A2 Site Plan Conceptual Site Plan
A2.1 Site Plan - Conceptual Fire Plan
A3 Trash Plan - Conceptual Trash Plan
A4.1 Building Plan – Subterranean Level/First Floor Plan
A4.2 Building Plan – Second Floor Plan/Third Floor Plan
A 4.3 Building Plan – Fourth Floor Plan/Fifth Floor Plan
A4.4 Building Plan – Six Level Garage Plan
A4.5 Building Plan - Seventh Level Garage/Roof Plan
A5.1 Elevation – South Elevation (Katella Avenue),West Elevation (Connector Street)
A5.2 Elevations – North Elevation, East Elevation
A6 Site Sections –Section A, Section B
A7.1 Floor Plans – Conceptual One Bedroom Unit Plans
A7.2 Floor Plans – Conceptual Two and Three Bedroom Unit Plans
L1 Overall Schematic Landscape Plan (Katella Avenue)
L2 Leasing Center Schematic Landscape Plan
L3 Recreation Area Schematic Landscape Plan
L4 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Patio)
L5 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Lounge)
L6 Design Support Images
L7 Schematic Lighting Plan – Katella Avenue
Material and Color Legend
ATTACHMENT NO. 11
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.CITY OF ANAHEIMPLATINUM GATEWAY ANDPLATINUM VISTA 17494
Final Site Plan
List of Exhibits for The Platinum Vista Project
Exhibit No.
Rendering of Connector Street
Tentative Tract Map
A1 Title Sheet
A1.0 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A1.2 Overall Conceptual Site Plan (Vista and Gateway Projects Combined)
A2 Site Plan Conceptual Site Plan
A2.1 Site Plan - Conceptual Fire Plan
A3 Trash Plan - Conceptual Trash Plan
A4.1 Building Plan – Subterranean Level/First Floor Plan
A4.2 Building Plan – Second Floor Plan/Third Floor Plan
A 4.3 Building Plan – Fourth Floor Plan/Fifth Floor Plan
A4.4 Building Plan – Six Level Garage Plan
A4.5 Building Plan - Seventh Level Garage/Roof Plan
A5.1 Elevation – South Elevation (Katella Avenue),West Elevation (Connector Street)
A5.2 Elevations – North Elevation, East Elevation
A6 Site Sections –Section A, Section B
A7.1 Floor Plans – Conceptual One Bedroom Unit Plans
A7.2 Floor Plans – Conceptual Two and Three Bedroom Unit Plans
L1 Overall Schematic Landscape Plan (Katella Avenue)
L2 Leasing Center Schematic Landscape Plan
L3 Recreation Area Schematic Landscape Plan
L4 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Patio)
L5 Courtyard Enlargement Schematic Landscape Plans (The Lounge)
L6 Design Support Images
L7 Schematic Lighting Plan – Katella Avenue
Material and Color Legend
ATTACHMENT NO. 12
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
PLATINUM GATEWAY AND
PLATINUM VISTA
17494
MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN NO. 306
CEQA ACTION: Previously Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 339
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This residential project is located on a 4.13-acre parcel consisting of 350 apartment units, including one five-story, wrap-style
apartment building with a separate six story parking structure with one subterranean level and a clubhouse located on
the seventh story of the parking structure - Platinum Vista Apartments.
PROJECT LOCATION: 1005-1105 East Katella Avenue
STAFF CONTACT PERSON, EMAIL & PHONE NUMBER: Vanessa Norwood, vnorwood@anaheim.net, (714) 765-4934
1. Property Owner/Developer – Shopoff Advisors, LP
2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any Mitigation Measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City of Anaheim, which will have the
same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or
City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent/timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to
the Planning Commission. Any cost associated with the information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be borne
by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City of Anaheim’s adopted fee schedule.
3. Timing - This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first
point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring
pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Program will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied
with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will
be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance.
4. Responsibility of Monitoring - Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all
departments listed for each mitigation measure.
5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – After project construction begins, the mitigation measures are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this
mitigation monitoring program and will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year stating how
compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the
measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction”, the annual
letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is completed.
6. Building Permit – for purposes of this mitigation monitoring program, a building perm shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new
building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor
additions to an existing structure or building.
ATTACHMENT NO. 13
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
Air Quality
2-1 Ongoing during grading and
construction
Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall be
responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to reduce
construction-related emissions; however, the resultant value is expected to remain
significant.
a) The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s
recommendations to reduce operational emissions.
b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as identified by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, off-road construction equipment with higher
air pollutant emissions standards for equipment greater than 50 horsepower,
based on manufacturer’s availability.
c) The contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-
fuel generators rather than temporary diesel-power generators, where feasible.
South Coast Air Quality
Management District;
Public Works Department,
Construction Services
Division;
Planning Department,
Planning Services Division
2-2 Ongoing during grading and
construction
Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall implement
the following measures in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control
under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 to further reduce PM10 and
PM2.5 emissions. To assure compliance, the City shall verify compliance that these
measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections. The
measures to be implemented are listed below:
a) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall re-establish ground cover on the construction site through
seeding and watering as quickly as possible to achieve a minimum control
efficiency for PM10 of 5 percent.
b) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall apply chemical soil stabilizers Pave to on-site haul roads to
achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared to travel on
unpaved, untreated roads.
c) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall phase grading to
prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of
time.
d) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall schedule
activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after
the end of work periods.
e) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall sweep streets with Rule 1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum
units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or
occurs as a result of hauling.
f) During active demolition and debris removal and grading, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor shall suspend demolition and
South Coast Air Quality
Management District;
Public Works Department,
Construction Services
Division;
Planning Department,
Planning Services Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
grading operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to achieve an
emissions control efficiency for PM10 under worst-case wind conditions of 98
percent.
g) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt,
sand, soil, or other loose materials and tarp materials with a fabric cover or
other suitable means to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent.
h) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a
minimum of every three hours on the construction site to achieve an emissions
reduction control efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.
i) During active demolition and debris removal, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall apply water to disturbed soils at the end of each
day to achieve an emission control efficiency for PM10 of 10 percent.
j) During scraper unloading and loading, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall ensure that actively disturbed areas maintain a
minimum soil moisture content of 12 percent by use of a moveable sprinkler
system or water truck to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 69 percent.
k) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than
15 miles per hour to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 57 percent.
2-3 Prior to approval of each
grading plan (for
Import/Export Plan) and prior
to issuance of demolition
permits (for Demolition
Plans),
Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit
Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling
and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials. These plans
shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the project and
options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials
on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the
vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it
within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building
materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public
agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project
site.
Planning Department,
Planning Services Division;
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
2-4 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit
evidence that high-solids or water-based low emissions paints and coatings are utilized in
the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project plans
and specifications. Additionally, the property owner/developer’s shall specify the use of
high-volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand application. Air-atomized spray
techniques shall not be permitted. Plans shall also show that property owner/developers
shall construct/build with materials that do not require painting, or use prepainted
South Coast Air Quality
Management District
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
construction materials, to the extent feasible.
2-5 In accordance with the
timing required by the Traffic
and Transportation Manager,
but no later than prior to the
first final Building and Zoning
inspection,
In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no
later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property
owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational
CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10 emissions:
• Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff,
August 2010 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH ) shall be implemented
as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.
• The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as
required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site
frontage routes as needed.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
2-6 Prior to issuance of building
permits
Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/architect shall submit energy
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the
California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that shows each new
structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum
of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce
roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the
energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building
materials and suppliers can be found at the following website:
http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways
not within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool
pavement materials are available at: http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances (e.g.,
EnergyStar® appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or
double-paned windows.
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing
over 50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the structure
to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and office
buildings.
Planning Department,
Building Division
Hydrology and Water Quality
3-2 At least 90 days prior to the
initiation of grading activities
Prior to the initiation of grading activities, for projects greater than one acre, coverage for the project must be obtained by electronically submitting permit registration documents to the State or obtaining coverage via current general construction permit prescribed
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
method by the property owner/developer pursuant to State and Federal National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As part of the NOI, a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The property
owner/developer shall also prepare and submit to the Development Services Division of
the Public Works Department, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and Chapter 7 of the Orange County
Drainage Area Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved prior to issuance of
grading permit. The SWPPP, in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the structural and nonstructural BMPs that will be implemented during construction (short-term) within
the Project Area as well as BMPs for long-term operation of the Project Area that address potential impacts to surface waters.
Noise
5-1 Prior to approval of street
improvement plans for any
project-related roadway
widening
Prior to approval of street improvement plans for any project-related roadway widening, the City shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design project acoustical features
that will limit traffic noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are below the City’s noise ordinance. These treatments shall be noted on the street improvement plans to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department and may include, but are not limited to, the
replacement of windows and doors at existing residences with acoustically rated windows and doors.
Planning Department,
Building Division;
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
5-2 Prior to issuance of a
building permit,
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project property owner/developers shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter, stationary sources (e.g., industrial,
commercial, stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior noise standards as follows:
a) The report shall demonstrate that the proposed residential design will result in
compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise levels, as required by the
California Building Code and California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24
and 25 of the California Code of Regulations).
b) The report shall demonstrate that the Proposed Project residential design shall
minimize nighttime awakening from stadium event noise and train horns such
that interior single-event noise levels are below 81 dBA Lmax.
The property owner/developer shall submit the noise mitigation report to the Planning
Director for review and approval. Upon approval by the City, the project acoustical design features shall be incorporated into construction of the Proposed Project.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-3 Prior to the first final building
and zoning inspection
Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that occupancy disclosure notices regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be elevated during a stadium event will be provided to all future tenants in the Stadium District.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-4 Prior to the first final building
and zoning inspection
Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that occupancy disclosure notices regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be elevated during sounding of train
Planning Department,
Building Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
horns will be provided to all future tenants facing an at-grade crossing of the Orange County Line.
5-5 Prior to issuance of the first
building permit
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, to reduce noise and vibration impacts from
the impact pile driver, the construction contractor shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct cast-in-place piles for a pile-
supported transfer slab foundation system. This alternative construction method would
reduce the duration necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or eliminate the need to use pile drivers altogether. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted to
the Planning Department in the form of a letter from the construction contractor.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-7 Ongoing during grading,
demolition, and construction
Ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise:
a) Noise generated by construction, shall be limited by the property
owner/developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, before 7:00 AM and
after 7:00 PM, as governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure Levels, of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment that produces noise levels noticeably
above general construction noise levels to the hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
c) All internal combustion engines on all of the construction equipment shall be
properly outfitted with well maintained muffler systems
Planning Department,
Building Division;
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
5-8 Ongoing during construction
activities
Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to properly maintain and tune all construction equipment
to minimize noise emissions.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-9 Ongoing during construction
activities
Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring project contractors to locate all stationary noise sources (e.g., generators, compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied noise-sensitive receptors as is
feasible.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-10 Ongoing during construction
activities
Ongoing during construction activities, material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 6.70.
Planning Department,
Building Division
Public Services
7-1 Prior to issuance of a
Building Permit
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed by the property owner/developer prior to each final Building and Zoning inspection.
Fire Department
7-2 Prior to issuance of a
Building Permit
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for fire facilities and equipment impact fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36.
Fire Department
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
7-3 Prior to the approval of a
Final Site Plan
Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including implementation of Ordinance
6016 and the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (i.e., building
design, circulation, site planning and lighting of parking structure and parking areas). Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking structures (for the police helicopter).
Minimum size for numbers shall be four feet in height and two feet in width. The lines for
the numbers shall be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to the parking structure and shall face the street to which the
structure is addressed.
Police Department
7-4 Prior to the issuance of each
Building Permit for a parking
structure
Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit for a parking structure , the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit monitoring and recording or other
substitute security measures as may be approved by the Anaheim Police Department.
Said measures shall be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning inspections.
Police Department
7-5 Prior to the approval of a
Final Site Plan
Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit design plans that shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access
points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Anaheim Police
Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim Police Department.
Police Department
7-6 Ongoing during project
operation
Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim Police Department of Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control
services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fairshare basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services.
Police Department;
Public Works Department,
Traffic Management Center
7-9 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the school impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Anaheim Union High
School District and Anaheim City School District in compliance with Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section 65995 [b][3] as amended).
Community Development
Department,
Redevelopment Services;
Planning Department,
Planning Services Division
Transportation and Traffic
9-4 Prior to issuance of the first
building permit
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees, Traffic Impact
and Improvement Fees, and Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of Anaheim in
amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit
districts which have been established.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division;
9-5 Prior to approval of the first
final subdivision map or
issuance of the first building
Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the
Public Works Department,
Development Services;
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
permit, whichever occurs
first,
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.
9-6 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement for
Prior to approval of a Development Agreement for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property
owner/developers shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when the improvements identified in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft
Traffic Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010 (Appendix F of this SEIR) shall be designed and constructed. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall
require the property owner/developer to implement traffic improvements as identified in
the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and
methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339, Orange County Congestion Management
Program and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement
phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The Development
Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to
construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system
improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless
alternative funding sources have been identified.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-7 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement (in
conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
analysis as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6.)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions
identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6.
The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair-
share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-
share calculations shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-way, and
construction costs, unless alternative funding sources have been identified to help pay for the improvement.
The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-8 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement (in
conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
analysis as required in
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation with the City of Orange:
a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by
the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair-share percentage
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
Mitigation Measure 9-6.) responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis.
b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share
responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange.
c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount
received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is
executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share
contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at
the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities.
d) The City shall work with the City of Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure tha
fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial and intersection impacts in the City
of Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible.
9-9 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement (in
conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
analysis as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6.)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City will
take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s proportionate impact on the specific
freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance,
performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339 and
established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and City
of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines.
b) The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-10 Prior to the approval of the
final subdivision map or
issuance of a Building
Permit, whichever occurs
first
Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share
responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations,
via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-11 Prior to approval of the first
final subdivision map or
issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit,
whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the
ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the
Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts generated by
the project.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
9-12 Subsequent to the
certification of the FEIR, and
prior to the approval of the
first Development
Agreement
Subsequent to the certification of the FEIR, and prior to the approval of the first Development Agreement, if the costs of the identified improvements in this traffic study cannot be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing Community Facilities
District (CFD), an update to the CFD or an update to the City’s traffic impact fee program
or other fee programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the recommended improvements. Any updated CFD or City traffic fee program shall
include the costs of implementing identified intersection and/or arterial improvements in
the City of Orange.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division;
9-14 In conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be constructed,
subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-15 Prior to the approval of a
Final Site Plan
Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with
the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a
location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side
bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division;
Orange County
Transportation Authority
(OCTA)
Utilities and Service Systems
10-1 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance
of a grading or building
permit for each development
project, whichever occurs
first
The City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located
within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as identified in the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase sewer flows beyond
those programmed in the appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the
project currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer shall be required to
guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs
first, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development
based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee)
Program, if adopted for the project area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could
include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
10-2 Prior to the approval and
ongoing during construction
of any street improvement
plans
Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the
City and/or property owner/developer shall coordinate with the OCSD to ensure that all
improvements and construction schedules are coordinated.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
10-3 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance
of a grading or building
permit for each development
project, whichever occurs
first
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall contact Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding sewer capacity. Additionally,
if requested by the OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place up to three flow
monitoring devices for up to a month to verify capacity and ensure consistency with the OCSD’s modeling results.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
10-4 Prior to approval of sanitary
sewer connections for each
development project
Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for each development project, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade structures of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Where
requested by the City Engineer, sewer improvements shall be constructed with larger than recommended diameter to maintain the surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert
elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above the hydraulic grade line elevation of the
surcharge levels when they are above the pipe crown.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
10-5 Prior to the approval and
ongoing during construction
of any street improvement
plans within the Platinum
Triangle
Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where OCSD will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner shall
coordinate with OCSD to ensure that backflow prevention devices are installed by OCSD at the lateral connections to prevent surcharge flow from entering private properties.
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Division;
Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD)
10-6 Prior to final design approval Prior to final design approval, additional analysis shall be performed and provided for each
individual project using flow, wet-weather data, and other information specific for that project in order to obtain more accurate results of the surcharge levels for final design.
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Division
10-7 Prior to issuance of a
building permit and in
conjunction with submittal of
landscape and building plans
Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:
• Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible;
• Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash
down of exterior areas;
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and
urinals;
• Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic
systems which use moisture sensors;
• Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;
• Low-flow shower heads in hotels;
Public Utilities Department,
Resource Efficiency
Division;
Public Works Department
Development Services
Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
• Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are
lowest;
• Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other
water using appliances;
• Cooling tower recirculating system;
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;
• Use of waterway recirculation systems;
• Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
• Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes
available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans.
10-8 Prior to the issuance of the
first building permit
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide engineering studies, including network analysis, to size the water mains for ultimate development within the project. This includes detailed water usage analysis and
building plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval in determining project water requirements and appropriate water assessment fees.
Public Utilities Department,
Water Engineering Division
10-9 Prior to the issuance of the
first building permit or
grading permit
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation
meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet. (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
Public Utilities Department,
Water Engineering Division;
10-12 Prior to issuance of a
building permit
Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000.
Public Utilities Department,
Resource Efficiency Division
10-13 Prior to issuance of a
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless water
heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient appliances.
Public Utilities Department,
Resource Efficiency Division
10-14 Prior to issuance of a
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines and use recycled water when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water.
Public Utilities Department,
Water Engineering Division
10-17 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall review the location of each project to Public Works Department,
Development Services
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first
determine if it is located within an area served by deficient drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the project will increase stormwater flows beyond those programmed in
the appropriate master plan drainage study for the area or if the project currently
discharges to an existing deficient storm drain system or will create a deficiency in an existing storm drain, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee
mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the drainage facilities, as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the impacts of
the proposed development based upon the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel
Tributary Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or
final Building and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure
Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the City
Engineer, which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a
combination thereof.
Division
10-18 Prior to the final building and
zoning inspections of each
development
Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property
owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the
Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City
of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of
Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at its
discretion, the following plan components:
• Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities.
• Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.
• Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing
adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.
• Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible
to reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for
collection.
• Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to
encourage recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where
feasible.
• Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
• Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and
city regulations.
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Division
10-19 Ongoing during project Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as Public Works Department,
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
operations feasible, by the property owner/developer:
• Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
• Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.
• Collection of office paper for recycling.
• Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges,
oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.
Streets and Sanitation
Division
10-20 Prior to the approval of each
grading plan (for
import/export plan) and prior
to issuance of demolition
permits (for demolition plans)
Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a
Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The plans
shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project and
options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an
environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The
property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or
concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of
other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site.
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Division
Public Works Department,
Traffic Engineering Division
10-21 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit
plans showing that each structure will exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations) by a
minimum of 10 percent and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department Business and Community Programs Division. This consultation shall take place during project design in order to review Title 24 measures that are incorporated into
the project design energy efficient practices and allow potential system alternatives such
as thermal energy storage air-conditioning, lighting, and building envelope options. Plans submitted for building permits shall show the proposed energy efficiencies and systems
alternatives.
Public Utilities Department,
Business and Community
Programs Division
10-22 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate
on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance with Title 24, which may include the following:
• High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.
• Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.
• Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.
• Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.
• Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.
• Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor
motors, air-handling units, and fan-coil units).
• Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.
Public Utilities Department,
Business and Community
Programs Division
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
• Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
• Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
• Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit signage.
• Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
• Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots.
• Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or
facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak
periods.
• Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as:
o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares
engineering for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings
and systems.
o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per kWh
saved for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency
that exceed Title 24 requirements..
o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.
• Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush [gpf] or less).
• Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).
• Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.
• Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping.
10-23 Prior to issuance of each
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public
Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems.
Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City.
The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the
current electric facilities:
• Relocate Southern California Edison transmission line underground on
Katella Avenue from west of the Union Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850
feet).
• Relocate Southern California Edison communication line underground on
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to east of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700
feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• Relocate distribution circuits underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis
Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim Way to
State College Boulevard (1,500 feet).
• Relocation a distribution circuit underground on Orangewood Avenue from
State College Boulevard to west of the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella
Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Lewis Street from Katella Avenue to Gene
Autry Way (950 feet).
• Relocate a distribution circuit underground on Douglas Street from Katella
Avenue to Cerritos Avenue (1,000 feet).
10-24 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit
plans for review and approval which shall ensure that buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California
Administrative Code) by a minimum of 10 percent.
Public Utilities Department,
Business and Community
Programs Division
10-25 Prior to issuance of each
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service
from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City.
The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities:
• Two new distribution duct banks on Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to
Lewis Street (800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Douglas Road to
Howell Avenue (2,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on State College Boulevard from Cerritos
Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the Santa
Ana River (4,800 feet).
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
Page 1 MMP No. 306
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from Haster Street to the
east side of I-5 (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Lewis Street and Santa Cruz Street from
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on the east side of the Angel Stadium parking
lot from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57 (2,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road from SR-57 to Cerritos
Avenue (4,000 feet).
10-26 Prior to issuance of each
building permit or grading
permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, the property owner/developer shall provide an electrical load analysis to the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD). The analysis shall include a load schedule and maximum electrical coincident
demand. Should the property owner/developer’s load analysis result in a contributed load
forecasted to exceed 20 MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the electrical system currently serving the Platinum Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction of a new
electrical substation within the Platinum Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees for the electrical substation will be assessed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City.
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
10-27 Ongoing The City shall coordinate all future street and infrastructure improvements within the
Platinum Triangle with other service providers, including Southern California Gas Company and the Orange County Sanitation District so that required infrastructure upgrades maybe constructed concurrently.
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
Southern California Gas
Company;
Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
11-1 Implementation timing is
identified for each individual
mitigation measure.
Mitigation measures for greenhouse gas emissions are comprised of mitigation measures
used for other environmental topical sections of this EIR and are listed above. These
mitigation measures, specified on Table 1-1 in the Executive Summary of the Draft SEIR,
would reduce GHG emissions associated with the project and are consistent with the
California Attorney General’s mitigation measures for energy efficiency, renewable
energy and storage, water conservation and efficiency, solid waste, land use,
transportation and motor vehicle, and agriculture and forestry measures. There are no
additional mitigation measures identified for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
impacts.
Responsible parties are
identified for each individual
mitigation measure.
Page 1 MMP No. 306
MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN NO. 307
CEQA ACTION: Previously Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 339 and Addendum Nos. 1 and 2
PROJECT DESCRIPTION: This residential project is located on a 6.61-acre parcel consisting of 399 apartment units including a wrap-style building 4-
stories in height with a separate six-story parking structure and a .4-acre public park.
PROJECT LOCATION: 905-917 East Katella Avenue
STAFF CONTACT PERSON, EMAIL & PHONE NUMBER: Vanessa Norwood, vnorwood@anaheim.net, (714) 765-4934
1. Property Owner/Developer – Shopoff Advisors, LP
2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing – Any Mitigation Measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City of Anaheim, which will have the
same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies
or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent/timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said
determination to the Planning Commission. Any cost associated with the information required in order to make a determination of environmental
equivalency/timing shall be borne by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the
City of Anaheim’s adopted fee schedule.
3. Timing - This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is
the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no
additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Program will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the
measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit
consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance.
4. Responsibility of Monitoring - Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all
departments listed for each mitigation measure.
5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures – After project construction begins, the mitigation measures are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this
mitigation monitoring program and will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year stating how
compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of
the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction”, the
annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is completed.
6. Building Permit – for purposes of this mitigation monitoring program, a building perm shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new
building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor
additions to an existing structure or building.
ATTACHMENT NO. 14
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
Air Quality
2-1 Ongoing during grading and
construction
Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall be
responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to reduce
construction-related emissions; however, the resultant value is expected to remain
significant.
a) The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s
recommendations to reduce operational emissions.
b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as identified by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, off-road construction equipment with higher
air pollutant emissions standards for equipment greater than 50 horsepower,
based on manufacturer’s availability.
c) The contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-
fuel generators rather than temporary diesel-power generators, where feasible.
South Coast Air Quality
Management District;
Public Works Department,
Construction Services
Division;
Planning Department,
Planning Services Division
2-2 Ongoing during grading and
construction
Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall implement
the following measures in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control
under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 to further reduce PM10 and
PM2.5 emissions. To assure compliance, the City shall verify compliance that these
measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections. The
measures to be implemented are listed below:
a) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall re-establish ground cover on the construction site through
seeding and watering as quickly as possible to achieve a minimum control
efficiency for PM10 of 5 percent.
b) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall apply chemical soil stabilizers Pave to on-site haul roads to
achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared to travel on
unpaved, untreated roads.
c) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall phase grading to
prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of
time.
d) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall schedule
activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after
the end of work periods.
e) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall sweep streets with Rule 1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum
units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or
occurs as a result of hauling.
South Coast Air Quality
Management District;
Public Works Department,
Construction Services
Division;
Planning Department,
Planning Services Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
f) During active demolition and debris removal and grading, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor shall suspend demolition and
grading operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to achieve an
emissions control efficiency for PM10 under worst-case wind conditions of 98
percent.
g) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt,
sand, soil, or other loose materials and tarp materials with a fabric cover or
other suitable means to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent.
h) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a
minimum of every three hours on the construction site to achieve an emissions
reduction control efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.
i) During active demolition and debris removal, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall apply water to disturbed soils at the end of each
day to achieve an emission control efficiency for PM10 of 10 percent.
j) During scraper unloading and loading, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall ensure that actively disturbed areas maintain a
minimum soil moisture content of 12 percent by use of a moveable sprinkler
system or water truck to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 69 percent.
k) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than
15 miles per hour to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 57 percent.
2-3 Prior to approval of each
grading plan (for
Import/Export Plan) and prior
to issuance of demolition
permits (for Demolition
Plans),
Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit
Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling
and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials. These plans
shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the project and
options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials
on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the
vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it
within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building
materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public
agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project
site.
Planning Department,
Planning Services Division;
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
2-4 Prior to issuance of each
building permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit
evidence that high-solids or water-based low emissions paints and coatings are utilized in
the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project plans
South Coast Air Quality
Management District
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
and specifications. Additionally, the property owner/developer’s shall specify the use of
high-volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand application. Air-atomized spray
techniques shall not be permitted. Plans shall also show that property owner/developers
shall construct/build with materials that do not require painting, or use prepainted
construction materials, to the extent feasible.
2-5 In accordance with the
timing required by the Traffic
and Transportation Manager,
but no later than prior to the
first final Building and Zoning
inspection,
In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no
later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property
owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational
CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10 emissions:
• Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff,
August 2010 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH ) shall be implemented
as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.
• The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as
required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site
frontage routes as needed.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
2-6 Prior to issuance of building
permits
Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/architect shall submit energy
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the
California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that shows each new
structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum
of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce
roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the
energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building
materials and suppliers can be found at the following website:
http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways
not within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool
pavement materials are available at: http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances (e.g.,
EnergyStar® appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or
double-paned windows.
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing
over 50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the structure
Planning Department,
Building Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and office
buildings.
Hydrology and Water Quality
3-2 At least 90 days prior to the
initiation of grading activities
Prior to the initiation of grading activities, for projects greater than one acre, coverage for
the project must be obtained by electronically submitting permit registration documents to
the State or obtaining coverage via current general construction permit prescribed method by the property owner/developer pursuant to State and Federal National Pollution
Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As part of the NOI, a Surface
Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The property owner/developer shall also prepare and submit to the Development Services Division of
the Public Works Department, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and Chapter 7 of the Orange County
Drainage Area Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved prior to issuance of
grading permit. The SWPPP, in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the structural and nonstructural BMPs that will be implemented during construction (short-term) within
the Project Area as well as BMPs for long-term operation of the Project Area that address
potential impacts to surface waters.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
Noise
5-1 Prior to approval of street
improvement plans for any
project-related roadway
widening
Prior to approval of street improvement plans for any project-related roadway widening, the City shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design project acoustical features
that will limit traffic noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are below the City’s noise
ordinance. These treatments shall be noted on the street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and may include, but are not limited to, the
replacement of windows and doors at existing residences with acoustically rated windows and doors.
Planning Department,
Building Division;
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
5-2 Prior to issuance of a
building permit,
Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project property owner/developers shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected
noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter, stationary sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior noise standards as follows:
a) The report shall demonstrate that the proposed residential design will result in
compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise levels, as required by the
California Building Code and California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24
and 25 of the California Code of Regulations).
b) The report shall demonstrate that the Proposed Project residential design shall
minimize nighttime awakening from stadium event noise and train horns such
that interior single-event noise levels are below 81 dBA Lmax.
Planning Department,
Building Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
The property owner/developer shall submit the noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for review and approval. Upon approval by the City, the project acoustical design features shall be incorporated into construction of the Proposed Project.
5-3 Prior to the first final building
and zoning inspection
Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that occupancy disclosure notices regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be elevated during a stadium event
will be provided to all future tenants in the Stadium District.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-4 Prior to the first final building
and zoning inspection
Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that occupancy disclosure notices regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be elevated during sounding of train
horns will be provided to all future tenants facing an at-grade crossing of the Orange County Line.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-5 Prior to issuance of the first
building permit
Prior to issuance of the first building permit, to reduce noise and vibration impacts from the impact pile driver, the construction contractor shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct cast-in-place piles for a pile-supported transfer slab foundation system. This alternative construction method would
reduce the duration necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or eliminate the need
to use pile drivers altogether. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted to the Planning Department in the form of a letter from the construction contractor.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-7 Ongoing during grading,
demolition, and construction
Ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall
be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit
construction-related noise:
a) Noise generated by construction, shall be limited by the property
owner/developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, before 7:00 AM and
after 7:00 PM, as governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure Levels, of the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment that produces noise levels noticeably
above general construction noise levels to the hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
c) All internal combustion engines on all of the construction equipment shall be
properly outfitted with well maintained muffler systems
Planning Department,
Building Division;
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
5-8 Ongoing during construction
activities
Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to properly maintain and tune all construction equipment to minimize noise emissions.
Planning Department,
Building Division
5-9 Ongoing during construction
activities
Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to locate all stationary noise sources (e.g., generators,
compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible.
Planning Department,
Building Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
5-10 Ongoing during construction
activities
Ongoing during construction activities, material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 6.70.
Planning Department,
Building Division
Public Services
7-1 Prior to issuance of a
Building Permit
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed by the property owner/developer prior to each final Building and Zoning inspection.
Fire Department
7-2 Prior to issuance of a
Building Permit
Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for fire facilities and equipment impact fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36.
Fire Department
7-3 Prior to the approval of a
Final Site Plan
Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit plans
to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including implementation of Ordinance
6016 and the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (i.e., building
design, circulation, site planning and lighting of parking structure and parking areas). Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking structures (for the police helicopter).
Minimum size for numbers shall be four feet in height and two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches apart. All numbers shall
have a contrasting color to the parking structure and shall face the street to which the
structure is addressed.
Police Department
7-4 Prior to the issuance of each
Building Permit for a parking
structure
Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit for a parking structure , the property
owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit monitoring and recording or other
substitute security measures as may be approved by the Anaheim Police Department.
Said measures shall be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning inspections.
Police Department
7-5 Prior to the approval of a
Final Site Plan
Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit design plans that shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Anaheim Police
Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim Police Department.
Police Department
7-6 Ongoing during project
operation
Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim Police Department of Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fairshare basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services.
Police Department;
Public Works Department,
Traffic Management Center
7-9 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the school impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Anaheim Union High School District and Anaheim City School District in compliance with Senate Bill 50
Community Development
Department,
Redevelopment Services;
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
(Government Code [GC] Section 65995 [b][3] as amended). Planning Department,
Planning Services Division
Transportation and Traffic
9-4 Prior to issuance of the first
building permit
Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees, Traffic Impact
and Improvement Fees, and Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the
building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the
property owner/developer; and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division;
9-5 Prior to approval of the first
final subdivision map or
issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs
first,
Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the
Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.
Public Works Department,
Development Services;
9-6 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement for
Prior to approval of a Development Agreement for any project forecast to generate 100 or
more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager
utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property
owner/developers shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when the improvements identified in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft
Traffic Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010 (Appendix F of this SEIR) shall be
designed and constructed. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to implement traffic improvements as identified in
the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s
General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339, Orange County Congestion Management
Program and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of
service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The Development
Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to
construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system
improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-7 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement (in
conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
analysis as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6.)
The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair-share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-
share calculations shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-way, and
construction costs, unless alternative funding sources have been identified to help pay for the improvement.
The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary
circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified.
9-8 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement (in
conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
analysis as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6.)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation
with the City of Orange:
a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by
the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair-share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis.
b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share
responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange.
c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount
received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is
executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share
contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at
the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities.
d) The City shall work with the City of Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure tha
fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial and intersection impacts in the City
of Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-9 Prior to approval of a
Development Agreement (in
conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
analysis as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6.)
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted
freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s proportionate impact on the specific
freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance,
performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339 and
established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and City
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines.
b) The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
9-10 Prior to the approval of the
final subdivision map or
issuance of a Building
Permit, whichever occurs
first
Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations,
via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-11 Prior to approval of the first
final subdivision map or
issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit,
whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication
(with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the
Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts generated by
the project.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
9-12 Subsequent to the
certification of the FEIR, and
prior to the approval of the
first Development
Agreement
Subsequent to the certification of the FEIR, and prior to the approval of the first Development Agreement, if the costs of the identified improvements in this traffic study cannot be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing Community Facilities District (CFD), an update to the CFD or an update to the City’s traffic impact fee program
or other fee programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the recommended improvements. Any updated CFD or City traffic fee program shall
include the costs of implementing identified intersection and/or arterial improvements in
the City of Orange.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division;
9-14 In conjunction with the
preparation of any traffic
improvement phasing
analyses as required in
Mitigation Measure 9-6
In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be constructed,
subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6.
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division
9-15 Prior to the approval of a
Final Site Plan
Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with
the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to
be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side
bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA).
Public Works Department,
Traffic and Transportation
Division;
Orange County
Transportation Authority
(OCTA)
Utilities and Service Systems
10-1 Prior to approval of a final The City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located
within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as identified in the latest updated Public Works Department,
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
subdivision map or issuance
of a grading or building
permit for each development
project, whichever occurs
first
sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create a
deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer shall be required to
guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs
first, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development
based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee)
Program, if adopted for the project area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could
include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof.
Development Services
Division
10-2 Prior to the approval and
ongoing during construction
of any street improvement
plans
Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the
City and/or property owner/developer shall coordinate with the OCSD to ensure that all
improvements and construction schedules are coordinated.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
10-3 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance
of a grading or building
permit for each development
project, whichever occurs
first
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall contact Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding sewer capacity. Additionally,
if requested by the OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a month to verify capacity and ensure consistency with the
OCSD’s modeling results.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
10-4 Prior to approval of sanitary
sewer connections for each
development project
Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for each development project, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade structures of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Where requested by the City Engineer, sewer improvements shall be constructed with larger than
recommended diameter to maintain the surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above the hydraulic grade line elevation of the
surcharge levels when they are above the pipe crown.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
10-5 Prior to the approval and
ongoing during construction
of any street improvement
plans within the Platinum
Triangle
Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where OCSD will be upsizing trunk
lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD to ensure that backflow prevention devices are installed by OCSD at
the lateral connections to prevent surcharge flow from entering private properties.
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Division;
Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD)
10-6 Prior to final design approval Prior to final design approval, additional analysis shall be performed and provided for each individual project using flow, wet-weather data, and other information specific for that project Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
in order to obtain more accurate results of the surcharge levels for final design. Division
10-7 Prior to issuance of a
building permit and in
conjunction with submittal of
landscape and building plans
Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:
• Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible;
• Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash
down of exterior areas;
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and
urinals;
• Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic
systems which use moisture sensors;
• Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;
• Low-flow shower heads in hotels;
• Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are
lowest;
• Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other
water using appliances;
• Cooling tower recirculating system;
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;
• Use of waterway recirculation systems;
• Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
• Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes
available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify
which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans.
Public Utilities Department,
Resource Efficiency
Division;
Public Works Department
Development Services
Division
10-8 Prior to the issuance of the
first building permit
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide engineering studies, including network analysis, to size the water mains for ultimate development within the project. This includes detailed water usage analysis and building plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval in determining
Public Utilities Department,
Water Engineering Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
project water requirements and appropriate water assessment fees.
10-9 Prior to the issuance of the
first building permit or
grading permit
Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first,
the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation
meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet. (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures)
Public Utilities Department,
Water Engineering Division;
10-12 Prior to issuance of a
building permit
Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office
and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials
pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000.
Public Utilities Department,
Resource Efficiency Division
10-13 Prior to issuance of a
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features including,
but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient
appliances.
Public Utilities Department,
Resource Efficiency Division
10-14 Prior to issuance of a
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines
and use recycled water when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water.
Public Utilities Department,
Water Engineering Division
10-17 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance
of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall review the location of each project to
determine if it is located within an area served by deficient drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel
Tributary Area. If the project will increase stormwater flows beyond those programmed in
the appropriate master plan drainage study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient storm drain system or will create a deficiency in an
existing storm drain, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer shall be required to
install the drainage facilities, as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones
of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel
Tributary Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or
final Building and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure, whichever occurs first.
Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the City
Engineer, which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a
combination thereof.
Public Works Department,
Development Services
Division
10-18 Prior to the final building and
zoning inspections of each
Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
development AB939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain
in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at its
discretion, the following plan components:
• Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities.
• Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.
• Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing
adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.
• Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible
to reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for
collection.
• Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to
encourage recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where
feasible.
• Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
• Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and
city regulations.
Division
10-19 Ongoing during project
operations
Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer:
• Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
• Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.
• Collection of office paper for recycling.
• Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges,
oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Division
10-20 Prior to the approval of each
grading plan (for
import/export plan) and prior
to issuance of demolition
permits (for demolition plans)
Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works
Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project and
options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials
on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an
environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The
property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of
Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation
Division
Public Works Department,
Traffic Engineering Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site.
10-21 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit
plans showing that each structure will exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for
Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department Business and Community Programs Division. This consultation shall take
place during project design in order to review Title 24 measures that are incorporated into the project design energy efficient practices and allow potential system alternatives such
as thermal energy storage air-conditioning, lighting, and building envelope options. Plans submitted for building permits shall show the proposed energy efficiencies and systems
alternatives.
Public Utilities Department,
Business and Community
Programs Division
10-22 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate
on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance
with Title 24, which may include the following:
• High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.
• Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.
• Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.
• Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.
• Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.
• Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor
motors, air-handling units, and fan-coil units).
• Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.
• Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
• Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
• Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit signage.
• Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
• Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots.
• Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or
facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak
periods.
• Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as:
o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares
Public Utilities Department,
Business and Community
Programs Division
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
engineering for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings
and systems.
o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per kWh
saved for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency
that exceed Title 24 requirements..
o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.
• Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush [gpf] or less).
• Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).
• Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.
• Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping.
10-23 Prior to issuance of each
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems.
Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City.
The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities:
• Relocate Southern California Edison transmission line underground on
Katella Avenue from west of the Union Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850
feet).
• Relocate Southern California Edison communication line underground on
Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to east of State College Boulevard (2,400
feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700
feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• Relocate distribution circuits underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis
Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim Way to
State College Boulevard (1,500 feet).
• Relocation a distribution circuit underground on Orangewood Avenue from
State College Boulevard to west of the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Lewis Street from Katella Avenue to Gene
Autry Way (950 feet).
• Relocate a distribution circuit underground on Douglas Street from Katella
Avenue to Cerritos Avenue (1,000 feet).
10-24 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit
Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans for review and approval which shall ensure that buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California
Administrative Code) by a minimum of 10 percent.
Public Utilities Department,
Business and Community
Programs Division
10-25 Prior to issuance of each
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first
Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public
Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the
current electric facilities:
• Two new distribution duct banks on Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to
Lewis Street (800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Douglas Road to
Howell Avenue (2,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on State College Boulevard from Cerritos
Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the Santa
Ana River (4,800 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from Haster Street to the
east side of I-5 (2,500 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).
• A new transmission duct bank on Lewis Street and Santa Cruz Street from
Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,000 feet).
• A new distribution duct bank on the east side of the Angel Stadium parking
lot from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57 (2,000 feet).
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
Page 1 MMP No. 307
Measure No. Timing Measure Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
• A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road from SR-57 to Cerritos
Avenue (4,000 feet).
10-26 Prior to issuance of each
building permit or grading
permit
Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, the property owner/developer shall provide an electrical load analysis to the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD). The analysis shall include a load schedule and maximum electrical coincident
demand. Should the property owner/developer’s load analysis result in a contributed load forecasted to exceed 20 MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the electrical system
currently serving the Platinum Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction of a new electrical substation within the Platinum Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and
other applicable fees for the electrical substation will be assessed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City.
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
10-27 Ongoing The City shall coordinate all future street and infrastructure improvements within the
Platinum Triangle with other service providers, including Southern California Gas Company and the Orange County Sanitation District so that required infrastructure
upgrades maybe constructed concurrently.
Public Utilities Department,
Electrical Engineering
Division;
Southern California Gas
Company;
Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD)
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
11-1 Implementation timing is
identified for each individual
mitigation measure.
Mitigation measures for greenhouse gas emissions are comprised of mitigation measures
used for other environmental topical sections of this EIR and are listed above. These
mitigation measures, specified on Table 1-1 in the Executive Summary of the Draft SEIR,
would reduce GHG emissions associated with the project and are consistent with the
California Attorney General’s mitigation measures for energy efficiency, renewable
energy and storage, water conservation and efficiency, solid waste, land use,
transportation and motor vehicle, and agriculture and forestry measures. There are no
additional mitigation measures identified for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions
impacts.
Responsible parties are
identified for each individual
mitigation measure.
ATTACHMENT NO. 15
ATTACHMENT NO. 16
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................. 1
1.1 Purpose ....................................................................................................................................... 1
1.2 Project Description ..................................................................................................................... 1
1.3 Scope of Services ....................................................................................................................... 1
2.0 BACKGROUND .................................................................................................................................... 2
2.1 Site Description .......................................................................................................................... 2
2.2 Site Topography….... ................................................................................................................. 2
2.3 Geologic Setting ......................................................................................................................... 2
2.4 Regional Groundwater ............................................................................................................... 2
3.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY ......................................................................................................... 3
Table 1 – Summary of Major Active Faults .................................................................................... 3
3.1 Seismic Parameters ..................................................................................................................... 4
3.2 Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture ........................................................................... 4
3.3 Liquefaction................................................................................................................................ 4
3.4 Seismic Induced Settlement ....................................................................................................... 5
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ............................................................ 5
4.1 Field Exploration ........................................................................................................................ 5
4.2 Subsurface Conditions ................................................................................................................ 6
4.3 Laboratory Testing and Classification ........................................................................................ 6
4.3.1 Moisture Content and Dry Density ............................................................................ 6
4.3.2 Grain Size Distribution .............................................................................................. 6
4.3.3 Liquid Limits, Plastic Limits, and Plasticity Index .................................................... 6
4.3.4 Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content ........................................... 7
4.3.5 Direct Shear ................................................................................................................ 7
4.3.6 Expansion Index ......................................................................................................... 7
4.3.7 Consolidation Testing................................................................................................. 7
4.3.8 Sulfate/Corrosion........................................................................................................ 7
5.0 CONCLUSIONS .................................................................................................................................... 8
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................................................... 9
6.1 General ....................................................................................................................................... 9
6.2 Site Preparation and Grading ..................................................................................................... 9
6.3 Remedial Earthwork ................................................................................................................. 10
6.4 Fill Placement ........................................................................................................................... 10
6.5 Shrinkage and Bulking ............................................................................................................. 11
6.6 Temporary Excavation ............................................................................................................. 11
7.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 11
7.1 General ..................................................................................................................................... 12
7.2 Foundation Design – Residential Buildings ............................................................................. 12
7.3 Foundation Design – Parking Structure ................................................................................... 13
7.4 Settlement ................................................................................................................................. 13
7.5 Footing Setbacks ...................................................................................................................... 13
7.6 Construction ............................................................................................................................. 13
7.7 Concrete Slab-on-Grade ........................................................................................................... 14
7.8 Retaining Walls ........................................................................................................................ 15
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
8.0 PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................... 15
8.1 Rigid and Flexible Non Pervious Pavement ............................................................................. 15
Table 2 – Preliminary Pavement Design Recommendations ......................................................... 16
8.2 Pervious Pavement ................................................................................................................... 16
8.2.1. Recommendations for Use of Pervious Interlocking concrete Pavement Onsite .... 17
8.2.2. Recommendations for Use of Pervious concrete Pavement Onsite ......................... 17
9.0 DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS ................................................................................... 17
9.1 Landscape Maintenance and Planting ...................................................................................... 18
9.2 Site Drainage ............................................................................................................................ 18
9.3 Site Runoff Considerations-Stormwater Disposal Systems ..................................................... 18
9.3.1 Percolation Testing ................................................................................................... 18
Table 3 – Percolation Test Results ................................................................................... 19
9.3.2 Stormwater Management Plan ................................................................................. 19
9.4 Additional Site Improvements .................................................................................................. 20
9.5 Trenching.................................................................................................................................. 20
9.6 Utility Backfill .......................................................................................................................... 20
10.0 PLAN REVIEW ............................................................................................................................... 21
11.0 LIMITATIONS ................................................................................................................................ 21
12.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................................. 22
FIGURES
Figure 1 – Site Vicinity Map
Figure 2 – Aerial Site Map
Figure 3 – Boring Location Map
APPENDICES
Appendix A – Soil Classification Chart and Boring Logs
Appendix B – Laboratory Test Data
Appendix C – Liquefaction Analysis
Appendix D – Earthwork and Grading Guidelines
Distribution: (2) Addressee
(1) Addressee (electronic copy)
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
1
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this evaluation was to provide geotechnical information to Shopoff Advisors LP
(hereinafter referred to as “Client”), regarding the proposed residential development in Anaheim, Orange
County, California. The information developed in this evaluation is intended to provide the Client and
other members of the design team with an understanding of the physical conditions of site-specific
subsurface soils, groundwater, and the regional geologic setting which could affect the cost or design of
the proposed development (Site Vicinity Map-Figure 1, Aerial Site Map-Figure 2).
This geotechnical evaluation has been conducted in general accordance with the accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and in general conformance with the approved proposal and cost estimate for the
project by EEI, dated April 10, 2012.
EEI conducted an onsite field exploration on May 24 and May 25, 2012 that included drilling and
sampling of ten (10) hollow stem auger geotechnical borings for the proposed residential development.
We conducted two (2) percolation tests of the upper soils in conjunction with our field exploration. This
geotechnical evaluation has been prepared for the sole use of Shopoff Advisors, LP. Other parties,
without the express written consent of EEI and Shopoff Advisors, LP, should not rely upon this
geotechnical study.
1.2 Project Description
Based on our review of a conceptual site plan provided (Architects Orange, dated May 18, 2012), the
proposed development is for the construction of a four-story structure to house multi-family residential
apartments comprised of attached buildings that will typically house 700 to 1,400 square feet of living
space that will include a total of 399 residential units, along with related improvements including an at-
grade, five-level parking structure, underground utilities, public park and other associated improvements.
The residential buildings are anticipated to be constructed of wood or steel frame and slab-on-grade
construction. The multi-level parking structure is anticipated to be constructed of either steel frame or
reinforced/pre-stressed concrete on conventional spread and isolated pad footings. No foundation plans
were available at the time of our preparation of this report; however, foundation loads are anticipated to
be typical for the planned construction. No grading plans are available at this time.
1.3 Scope of Services
The scope of our services included:
• A review of readily available data pertinent to the subject property, including published and
unpublished geologic reports/maps, and soils data for the area (References).
• The drilling, logging and sampling of ten (10) hollow stem auger (HSA) borings to depths on the
order of 9 to 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface across the site. Percolation testing was
conducted at two (2) of the boring locations. The locations of each of our borings and percolation
tests are presented on Figure 3 (Boring Locations and Proposed Site Map).
• An evaluation of seismicity and geologic hazards that includes an evaluation of faulting and
liquefaction potential.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
2
• Completion of laboratory testing of representative earth materials encountered onsite to ascertain
their soils engineering properties, including corrosion potential (Appendix B).
• The preparation of this report which presents our findings, conclusions, and recommendations
regarding the proposed development.
2.0 BACKGROUND
2.1 Site Description
The subject site parcel is situated at 905-917 East Katella Avenue, northeast of the intersection of East
Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street in Anaheim, California. The subject property is presently
occupied by an approximately 175,000 square foot industrial building that contains multiple tenants that
include a medical facility along with related improvements, which will be razed prior to the proposed new
construction. Current access to the site is afforded by E. Katella Avenue, which bounds the property to the
south. The site is also bounded to the north generally by retail and commercial development, to the west
by Lewis Street, and to the east by commercial and retail development. A site vicinity map is attached as
Figure 1.
The center of the property is situated at 33.8043° north latitude and 117.8968° west longitude (Google
Earth®, 2011).
2.2 Site Topography
The subject property is situated within the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Anaheim, California
7.5 Minute Quadrangle map (USGS, 1965). A review of these topographic maps indicates that the
ground surface of the subject property is approximately 145 feet above mean sea level (msl). The subject
site is overall gently sloping toward the west and south. Surface water appears to drain in a southwesterly
direction towards storm drain appurtenances along E. Katella Avenue. An aerial photo of site is attached
as Figure 2.
2.3 Geologic Setting
Regionally, the area is situated within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province of California (CGS,
2002). The Peninsular Ranges are essentially a series of ranges separated by northwest trending valleys,
sub-parallel to faults branching from the San Andreas Fault system. The northern portion of this Province
is bounded by the Transverse Ranges Geomorphic Province. The Peninsular Ranges extend into Lower
California (and Baja), and are bound on the east by the Colorado Desert. The predominant structural
feature that has affected the geologic evolution of the province is the San Andreas Fault.
Regional geologic maps of the site vicinity (Morton and Miller, 1981; CDMG, 1997) indicate the
property is underlain by Pleistocene to Holocene age alluvial fan deposits. The deposits are locally
mantled by artificial fill materials of varying thicknesses.
2.4 Regional Groundwater
Our review of literature published by the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG, 1997)
indicates that the historic high groundwater in the vicinity of the site is at least 50 feet below the ground
surface. Monitoring well data available on California Department of Water Resources, Water Data
Library website (http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary), indicate recorded groundwater conditions at
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
3
approximately 89 to 124 feet below the grades in the general vicinity of the site. The nearest well,
04S10W26C001S, located approximately 0.23 miles west, reported a depth to groundwater at
approximately 124 feet below ground surface (bgs) that was measured in 1973. Well number
04S10W23R001S, located approximately 0.34 miles northeast reported a depth to groundwater at 89.8
feet bgs that was measured in 1969. Well 04S10W25D001S, approximately 0.50 miles east, reported a
depth to groundwater at 113 feet bgs that was measured in 2010.
Based on information provided on the GeoTracker website (www.geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov), the nearby
Former Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) of the northeast corner of East
Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street, reported depth to groundwater at approximately 80 to 100 feet
below ground surface (bgs). In general, groundwater is expected to follow the direction of surface
topography. Based on topography, regional groundwater flow direction can be expected to generally be
in a west-southwesterly direction (USGS, 1965).
Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory boring excavations performed during our
study to the maximum depths explored. However, it should be noted that variations in subsurface water
(including perched water zones and seepage) may result from fluctuations in the ground surface
topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation and other factors that may not have been
evident at the time of our subsurface exploration.
3.0 FAULTING AND SEISMICITY
The portion of Southern California that includes the subject site is considered to be seismically active.
Due to the proximity of the site area to several nearby active faults, strong ground shaking could occur at
the site as a result of an earthquake on any one of the faults. Our review indicates that there are no known
active faults crossing the site (Jennings, 1994; Jennings and Bryant, 2010) and the site is not within a
State of California Earthquake Fault Zone (Hart and Bryant, 1997). It is our opinion, therefore, that the
likelihood of surface fault rupture at the site is low. The following table provides a summary of active
fault zones within an approximately 25-mile radius of the subject property that may have a considerable
effect on the subject property in the event significant activity is experienced. Fault names and
approximate distances are based upon information provided in applicable references (Blake, 2000;
Jennings, 1994).
TABLE 1
Summary of Major Active Faults
Fault Name Approximate Distance From Site
miles (kilometers)
Maximum Moment
Magnitude
San Joaquin Hills 7.7 (12.4) 6.6
Puente Hills Blind Thrust 8.5 (13.7) 7.1
Whittier 8.9 (14.3) 6.8
Newport-Inglewood (L.A. Basin) 10.4 (16.8) 7.1
Chino-Central Avenue (Elsinore) 11.9 (19.1) 6.7
Newport-Inglewood (Offshore) 14.8 (23.8) 7.1
Elsinore (Glen Ivy) 15.2 (24.5) 6.8
San Jose 16.3 (26.2) 6.4
Palos Verdes 20.1 (32.4) 7.3
Upper Elysian Park Blind Thrust 21.7 (34.9) 6.4
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
4
TABLE 1
Summary of Major Active Faults
Fault Name Approximate Distance From Site
miles (kilometers)
Maximum Moment
Magnitude
Sierra Madre 23.1 (37.2) 7.2
Cucamonga 24.2 (38.9) 6.9
Raymond 24.9 (40.0) 6.5
3.1 Seismic Parameters
Maximum considered ground motion maps provided in the California Building Code (CBC, 2010) were
utilized with coordinates of 33.8043° north latitude and 117.8968° west longitude, to determine the site
seismic parameters. EEI utilized seismic design criteria provided in the CBC (2010).
In accordance with the guidelines of the CBC (2010), the spectral parameters for the site (based on a Site
Class B soil) are estimated to be Ss = 1.366g and S1 = 0.495g. Based on the geotechnical data obtained
during our subsurface exploration it is our opinion that the site can be classified as Class D per the 2010
CBC (Table 1613.5.2). Consequently, Site Coefficients Fa= 1.0 and Fv = 1.505 appear to be appropriate
for the site. Based on this information, the adjusted maximum considered earthquake spectral response
parameters SMS = 1.366g and SM1 = 0.746g are recommended for seismic design of the project. Assuming
an occupancy category of II (Table 1604.5), an SDs value of 0.910g and an SD1 value of 0.497g, the
proposed buildings at the site can be assigned a seismic design category of D [Table 1613.5.6 (1) and (2)].
Final selection of the appropriate seismic design coefficients should be made by the structural consultant
based on the local laws and ordinances, expected building response and desired level of conservatism.
Structures should be designed in accordance with seismic design criteria developed by the Structural
Engineers Association of California.
3.2 Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture
Based on the geography, topography and site-specific geotechnical conditions encountered during our
geotechnical evaluation at the site, we consider the potential for ground lurching or shallow ground
rupture at the site to be low; however, due to the active seismicity of California, this possibility cannot be
completely ruled out. In light of this, the unlikely hazard of lurching or ground-rupture should not preclude
consideration of “flexible” design for onsite utility lines and connections.
3.3 Liquefaction
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced by earthquake
shaking or other rapid loading. Liquefaction and related phenomena have been responsible for substantial
structural damage in historical earthquakes, and are a design concern under certain conditions.
Liquefaction occurs in saturated soils, that is - soils in which the space between individual particles is
completely filled with water. This pore water exerts a pressure on the soil particles that influences how
tightly the particles themselves are pressed together.
Prior to an earthquake, pore water pressure is typically low; however, earthquake motion can cause the
pore water pressure to increase to the point where the soil particles can readily move with respect to each
other. When liquefaction occurs; the strength of the soil decreases and the ability of a soil deposit to
support structural loads are reduced.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
5
Due to the observed lack of a near surface static ground water level at the site, along with the observed
nature of the encountered materials comprising the Quaternary aged Alluvium that underlies the site, it
appears that liquefaction is not a significant geotechnical concern at the site.
3.4 Seismic Induced Settlement
Seismically induced settlement can occur due to reorientation of soil particles during strong shaking of
unsaturated sands, as well as in response to liquefaction of saturated loose granular soils. The potential
seismically induced settlement within the upper alluvial soils was estimated using the LiquefyPro
computer program (CivilTech, 2003), which incorporated Tokimatsu and Seed’s procedure (1987).
As noted in Section 1802.7.7(2) of the CBC (2010), liquefaction and seismic settlement analyses are to be
based on peak-ground accelerations determined from a site specific study; however, the CBC also
indicates that a site-specific ground motion study need not be performed, provided that a peak-ground
acceleration that equals SDS/2.5 is used (where SDS is the design spectral response acceleration at a short
period, as determined in accordance with Chapter 21 of ASCE 7). As indicated in Section 3.1 of this
report, an SDS value of 0.910g appears to be appropriate for the project site. When dividing this SDS value
by 2.5, a peak-ground acceleration of 0.364g is obtained, which is the value used in our evaluation.
Deaggregation of the probabilistic ground motion at the site was performed using the USGS interactive
webpage (web address https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/), which estimates the modal
magnitude for a given probabilistic seismic ground motion. Results of our seismic hazard deaggregation
(Appendix C) yielded a modal magnitude of 6.58, which is the magnitude used in our seismic settlement
analysis.
Based on our evaluation (Appendix C), which incorporates the geotechnical data obtained from our
exploratory Boring B-1, we estimate the total seismic-induced settlement to be less than 1 inch.
Differential earthquake induced settlements are estimated to be less than ½ inch across a 50-foot span.
4.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING
4.1 Field Exploration
Field work was conducted on May 24 and May 25, 2012. A total of ten (10) hollow stem auger borings
were drilled on the subject property. Percolation testing was performed in two (2) of the exploratory
borings during our field work. The borings were placed at various readily accessible locations across the
subject property and were extended to a maximum depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface.
Our exploratory borings were logged by a representative of EEI.
Blow count (N) values were determined utilizing a 140 pound automatic hammer, falling 30-inches onto a
Standard Penetration Test (SPT) split-spoon sampler and a Modified California split-tube sampler. A
truck mounted Mobile-B61 drill rig was used during field work. The blows per foot (N value) required to
advance the 18-inch long SPT and 12-inch long Modified California split-tube samplers was measured at
various initial depths followed by 5-foot intervals, recorded on the boring logs, and are presented in
Appendix A-Soil Classification Chart and Boring Logs. Relatively “undisturbed” samples were collected
in a 2.42-inch (inside diameter) California Modified split-tube sampler for visual examination and
laboratory testing. The soils were classified in accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System
(ASTM, 2008). Representative bulk samples were also collected for appropriate laboratory testing.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
6
4.2 Subsurface Conditions
Subsurface conditions encountered in our exploratory borings consisted of Quaternary age alluvial fan
deposits (alluvium) that extends to the maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground
surface. As encountered in our exploratory borings, the alluvial fan deposits were observed to consist of
interbedded poorly graded sands and silty sands, with lesser zones of sandy silts and clayey silts. The
sandy layers of the alluvium were observed to be typically dry to moist and loose to medium dense, while
the sandy silt and clayey silt layers were noted to be generally moist to very moist and firm to stiff at the
time of our subsurface exploration. Refusal was not encountered within any of our exploratory borings.
Detailed descriptions of the encountered soils are provided on the boring logs included as Appendix A.
Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory borings during our subsurface exploration.
However, it should be noted that variations in groundwater (including perched water zones and seepage)
may result from fluctuations in the ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation,
irrigation and other factors that may not have been evident at the time of our subsurface exploration.
4.3 Laboratory Testing and Classification
Representative samples were selected for laboratory testing to check their field classification(s). Field
descriptions and classifications were visually classified according to the American Society for Testing
and Materials (ASTM) D2488 which classifies soils under the Unified Soil Classification System
(USCS). Representative soil samples were tested in the lab for grain size distribution to determine actual
classifications by ASTM D2487-Standard Practice for Classification of Soils for Engineering Purposes in
accordance to the USCS. Final classifications of soils can be found on the boring logs in Appendix A
and the laboratory test data in Appendix B.
4.3.1 Moisture Content and Dry Density
The in-situ moisture content and dry density of soils was determined for soil samples obtained
from the borings. The in-place moisture content and dry density of soils helps to determine
engineering design parameters for foundations, retaining walls, and other engineering structures.
Moisture content on soil samples was conducted in general accordance with ASTM D2216, and
was recorded as a percentage. The in-situ moisture content and dry density for soil samples
retrieved from the field can be found on the boring logs located in Appendix A.
4.3.2 Grain Size Distribution
To help check field classifications of soils, the grain size distribution of representative soil
samples was determined. In order to find the percentages of different sized particles in a
particular soil stratum, soils were tested in general accordance to ASTM D 422-Standard Test
Method for Particle-Size Analysis of Soils. Grain size distribution curves and gradation results
are presented in Appendix B.
4.3.3 Liquid Limits, Plastic Limits, and Plasticity Index
The liquid limit, plastic limit, and plasticity index (PI) of soils were determined to aid in the
classification of soils (i.e., distinguishing clay from silt) and to help evaluate the potential for
expansion and seismically-induced liquefaction. The tests were performed in general accordance
with ASTM D-4318. The results are presented in the Appendix B.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
7
4.3.4 Maximum Dry Density and Optimum Moisture Content
The maximum dry density and optimum moisture content were determined from bulk samples
obtained from borings B3 and B9 at depths within five feet of existing grade. Our testing was
performed in general accordance with ASTM D1557, Method A. Results of our testing are
presented in Appendix B.
4.3.5 Direct Shear
Direct shear testing was conducted on two representative samples of the upper soils that were
remolded to 90 percent of their maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557) to measure their
shear strength characteristics for engineering purposes. The samples were inundated for at least
18 hours prior to testing. The samples were placed in a shear box and a normal load was applied
(10, 20, and 40 kilogram weights were used). The samples were then sheared at a controlled
strain rate in a direct shear apparatus that measures horizontal displacement and shear resistance.
Shear testing was performed in general accordance to ASTM D3080. The results of our testing
are presented in Appendix B.
4.3.6 Expansion Index
Two representative soil samples obtained from borings B-3 and B-9 within the upper five feet of
existing grade were tested for expansion potential. Our expansion index testing was conducted in
general accordance to ASTM D4829. The results of our expansion index testing are presented in
Appendix B.
4.3.7 Consolidation Testing
Consolidation properties of soils were determined to evaluate soil potential for compression and
long-term settlement. The consolidation test method includes measuring the amount and rate of
consolidation of soil when subject to loading. The test was run with a relatively undisturbed soil
sample in a 1-inch thick brass ring, collected from the Modified California sampler. The sample
was placed in a consolidometer with porous stones at the top and bottom of the sample and placed
in a loading frame. Weights were added and measurements of height were recorded from a dial
indicator as the sample was compressed. Measurements of height were also recorded during the
“rebound” period of removal of the weights. Consolidation testing was performed in general
accordance to ASTM D-2435.
During consolidation testing, the collapse potential of soils was assessed using the single
oedometer method. To measure hydrocollapse, water was added to the soil sample at a pressure
that is equivalent or slightly higher than the pressure that will likely be exerted on soils in the
field. Results of our consolidation testing are presented in Appendix B.
4.3.8 Sulfate/Corrosion
A representative sample of the upper onsite earth materials was collected for analysis at Clarkson
Laboratory and Supply, Inc. located in Chula Vista, California for corrosion/soluble sulfate
potential. This corrosion testing included soil minimum resistivity and pH by California Test
643, sulfate by California Test 417, and chloride by California Test 422. Results of these tests are
presented in Appendix B.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
8
It should be understood that the results provided in Appendix B are based upon pre-development
conditions. Verification testing is recommended at the conclusion of grading on samples
collected at or near finish grade.
5.0 CONCLUSIONS
Based on our field exploration, laboratory testing and engineering and geologic analysis, it is our opinion
that the site is suitable for the proposed residential development from a geotechnical engineering and
geologic viewpoint; however, there are existing geotechnical conditions associated with the property that
will warrant mitigation and/or consideration during planning stages. If site plans and/or the proposed
building locations are revised, additional field studies may be warranted to address proposed site-specific
conditions. As a result, EEI is providing the following conclusions:
• A total of ten (10) exploratory hollow stem auger (HSA) borings were advanced within the
subject property during this evaluation. This total includes borings for two (2) percolation tests
that were performed in conjunction with the HSA borings. The HSA borings extended to a
maximum depth of approximately 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface (bgs). Overall, the
subject property is underlain by Quaternary age alluvial fan deposits. The encountered materials
comprising the alluvial fan deposits were observed to consist of interbedded poorly graded sands
and silty sands with lesser interbeds of sandy silts and clayey silts. Refusal was not encountered
in any of our exploratory borings to the total depths explored.
• Groundwater was not encountered in any of our exploratory borings to the maximum depths
explored of 51.5 feet below existing grades. However, it should be noted that variations in
groundwater including perched water zones and seepage may result from fluctuations in the
ground surface topography, subsurface stratification, precipitation, irrigation and other factors
that may not have been evident at the time of our subsurface exploration.
• Laboratory test results indicate that earth materials are moderately alkaline (pH = 8.2) and are
highly corrosive to ferrous metals with a minimum resistivity value of 2,600 ohm-cm.
Laboratory testing of the upper soils yielded soluble sulfate concentration of 0.003 percent,
indicating a negligible corrosion potential to concrete. Chloride concentration within the tested
sample was reported to be 0.002 percent, indicating that the upper soils possess a low potential
for corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. Since EEI does not practice corrosion
engineering, we recommend that a qualified corrosion consultant be retained to further evaluate
the corrosion potential of the upper soils with respect to metallic conduits, and to provide
appropriate recommendations to mitigate the effects of corrosive soils, as warranted.
• The subject property is located within an area of southern California recognized as having a
number of active and potentially-active faults located nearby. Our review indicates that there are
no known active faults mapped as crossing the site and the site is not located within an
Earthquake Fault Zone. The nearest active faults that could affect the subject site include the San
Joaquin Hills Fault, located approximately 8 miles from the site, the Puente Hills Blind Thrust,
located approximately 9 miles from the site, the Whittier fault, located approximately 9 miles
from the site, and the Los Angeles Basin segment of the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone, located
approximately 10 miles from the site. Other nearby seismic sources includes the Chino-Central
Avenue segment of the Elsinore Fault Zone and the offshore segment of the Newport Inglewood
Fault Zone. Each of these active faults is capable of generating severe ground shaking at the site.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
9
• Based on EEI’s geotechnical evaluation, earth materials underlying the site of the proposed
residential development are not considered susceptible to liquefaction or significant amounts of
seismic settlement.
• Results of our Expansion Index laboratory testing of the upper soils indicate a very low
expansion potential.
• A conventional shallow foundation system appears to be suitable for use to support the structures
proposed for residential development, provided the property is graded and improved in general
conformance with recommendations presented herein, as well as the California Building Code
(CBC, 2010), the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange grading ordinances.
6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS
The recommendations presented herein should be incorporated into the planning and design phases of
development. Guidelines for site preparation, earthwork, and onsite improvements are provided in the
following sections.
6.1 General
Grading should conform to the guidelines presented in the California Building Code, 2010 (CBC, 2010)
and the grading ordinances of the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange. Additionally, general
Earthwork and Grading Guidelines are provided herein as Appendix D.
During earthwork construction, removals, excavations, as well as general grading procedures of the
contractor should be observed and the fill placed selectively tested by representatives of the geotechnical
engineer, EEI. If any unusual or unexpected conditions are exposed in the field, they should be reviewed
by the geotechnical engineer and if warranted, modified and/or additional remedial recommendations will
be offered. Specific guidelines and comments pertinent to the planned development are provided herein.
The recommendations presented herein have been completed using the information provided to us
regarding site development. If information concerning the proposed development is revised, or any
changes in the design and location of the proposed property improvements are made, the conclusions and
recommendations contained in this report should not be considered applicable unless the changes are
reviewed and conclusions of this report modified or approved in writing by this office.
6.2 Site Preparation and Grading
Debris and other deleterious material, such as organic soils and/or environmentally impacted earth
materials, should be removed from the site prior to the start of grading. Areas to receive fill should be
properly benched in accordance with current industry standards of practice and guidelines specified in the
CBC (2010).
Existing utilities should be removed within the proposed building envelope. Abandoned trenches should
be properly backfilled and tested. If unanticipated subsurface improvements (utility lines, septic systems,
wells, utilities, etc.) are encountered during earthwork construction, the geotechnical engineer should be
informed and appropriate remedial recommendations would then be provided.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
10
6.3 Remedial Earthwork
Alluvial materials were encountered underlying the site to the maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet in
each of our exploratory borings. The upper portions of the alluvium were observed to be somewhat dry
and loose and variable in relative density in our exploratory borings. Consequently, these materials are
considered to be potentially compressible and are considered unsuitable for the support of the proposed
building loads and additional fill loads in their current condition. Therefore, where they are not already
removed by the proposed site grading, the upper soils should be over-excavated and recompacted in the
areas proposed for construction, in order to reduce the potential for settlement and to provide relatively
uniform soil bearing conditions for the proposed building areas. We recommend that these upper soils be
removed to a depth of at least 5 feet below existing site grades, or a minimum of 36-inches below the
bottom of the proposed foundations (whichever is deeper) and replaced with compacted fill. Within the
areas where the residential structures are proposed, we also recommend that the upper soils be removed to
a depth of at least 36-inches below the bottom of the proposed foundation for the parking structure and
replaced with compacted fill.
Following removal of the upper soils, the bottom of the resulting excavation(s) should be observed by a
representative of EEI to check that unsuitable materials have been sufficiently removed. It should be
understood that based on the observations of our field representative, localized deeper removals may be
recommended. Some areas may encounter thicker zones of topsoil, fill or slopewash based on actual field
conditions encountered during earthwork.
The base of the removal areas should be level to avoid differential fill thicknesses under proposed
improvements. This remedial earthwork should extend at least five feet outside the proposed building
limits and/or five feet beyond the area to receive fill. Note that vertical sides exceeding five feet in depth
may be prone to sloughing and may require laying back to an inclination of 1:1 (horizontal to vertical).
After removal of the upper soils and observation of the excavation bottoms, the over-excavated areas
should be scarified to a minimum depth of 8-inches, moisture conditioned as needed to achieve at least
optimum moisture content and re-compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density (based on
ASTM D1557). The over-excavated areas should then be backfilled with onsite and/or imported soils that
are placed and compacted as recommended herein until design finish grades are reached.
6.4 Fill Placement
Fill material should possess an expansion index of less than 20 (as determined by ASTM D4829) and be
free of organic matter (less than three percent organics by weight) and other deleterious material. Much
of the onsite materials appear to be suitable for re-use as fill, provided they do not contain rocks greater
than six-inches in maximum dimension, organic debris and other deleterious materials. Rock fragments
exceeding six-inches in one dimension should be segregated and exported from the site, properly placed
in deeper fill areas or utilized for landscaping.
If import soils are needed, the earthwork contractor should ensure that all proposed fill materials are
approved by the geotechnical engineer prior to use. Representative soil samples should be made available
for testing at least ten working days prior to hauling to the site to allow for laboratory tests.
Fill materials should be placed in 6- to 8-inch loose lifts, moisture conditioned as necessary to at least
optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent maximum dry density according to ASTM
D1557. The upper 12-inches of pavement subgrade should be moisture conditioned to at least optimum
moisture and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
11
D1557. Suitable heavy grading equipment should be utilized to properly mix, spread, moisture condition
or dry, and compact each fill lift.
Earthwork may be affected by the existing soil moisture content exceeding optimum. Moist to very moist
earth materials may be difficult to mix and compact in their native condition, and drying or mixing with
drier soils may be warranted to achieve the recommended relative compaction.
Those areas to receive fill (including over-excavated areas) or surface improvements should be scarified
at least 8-inches, moisture conditioned to at least optimum moisture content and recompacted to at least
90 percent of the maximum dry density (based on ASTM D1557).
6.5 Shrinkage and Bulking
Several factors will impact earthwork balancing on the site, including shrinkage, bulking, subsidence,
trench spoils from utilities and footing excavations, and final pavement section thickness as well as the
accuracy of topography.
Shrinkage, bulking and subsidence are primarily dependent upon the degree of compactive effort
achieved during construction. For planning purposes, the shrinkage factor is estimated to be on the order
of 10 to 15 percent for the existing fill materials to be re-utilized as engineered fill. These shrinkage
factors may vary with methods employed by the contractor. Subsidence is estimated to be on the order of
0.1 feet. Losses from site clearing and removal of existing site improvements may affect earthwork
quantity calculation and should be considered.
The previous estimates are intended as an aid for the project engineers in estimating earthwork quantities.
It is recommended that the site development be planned to include an area that could be raised or lowered
to accommodate final site balancing.
6.6 Temporary Excavations
Temporary excavations or backcuts within the onsite materials should be stable at 1.1H:1V inclination for
short durations during construction but should not exceed 10 feet in height. All temporary excavations
should be constructed in accordance with OSHA guidelines and local safety codes.
7.0 FOUNDATION RECOMMENDATIONS
As noted above, the encountered alluvial soils were generally observed to be relatively loose and
potentially compressible. While removal and recompaction of the upper soils as described above in
Section 6.3 of this report can be expected to mitigate the settlement of the more lightly loaded structures
proposed for the site (such as the residential buildings proposed for the site), our geotechnical analyses
and experience indicate that the more heavily loaded parking structures (which can often impose column
loads on the order of 600 kips to 800 kips) could experience considerable settlements if they are
supported on conventional shallow foundations bearing upon the onsite materials.
A number of different options are available to provide adequate support for the propose parking structure,
while mitigating the potential for settlement of the upper soils. After conferring with Shopoff Advisors
and members of the design team, we are providing herein recommendations for a conventional shallow
foundation system to support the proposed residential buildings and a reinforced mat foundation system
for the support of the proposed parking structure.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
12
Other measures to reduce the potential for settlement and to improve the bearing characteristics of the
upper soils are available and we would be pleased to provide the alternative recommendations upon
request.
Be advised that as part of the foundation design election process, there is always a cost/benefit evaluation.
Although we are providing recommendations for foundation design we have not accomplished the
cost/benefit evaluation.
7.1 General
In the event that plans concerning the proposed four-story building structures and five-level parking
structure are revised in the project design and/or location or loading conditions of the planned structures
are made, conclusions and recommendations contained in this report should not be considered valid
unless they are reviewed, revised and/or approved in writing by EEI. The foundation recommendations
provided herein are based on the soil materials near finish grade possessing a very low expansion
potential (Expansion Index < 21). Recommendations by the project's design-structural engineer or
architect may exceed the following minimum recommendations. Final foundation and slab design should
be provided based on the expansion potential of the near surface soils encountered during grading.
7.2 Foundation Design – Residential Buildings
The proposed residential structures can be supported on conventional continuous or isolated spread
footings bearing entirely upon at least 36-inches of properly compacted fill materials. Foundations
supporting the four story residential structures should be constructed with an embedment of at least 24-
inches below finish grade. At these depths, footings may be designed for an allowable soil bearing value
of 3,500 psf. This value may be increased by one-third for loads of short duration, such as wind and
seismic forces. Continuous footings supporting four-story structures should have minimum width of 18-
inches. We recommend a minimum width of 24-inches for isolated spread footings. Based on
geotechnical considerations, continuous footings should be provided with reinforcement consisting of two
No. 4 rebars, one top and one bottom; however, the actual foundation reinforcement should be in
accordance with the structural engineer’s requirements.
In order to help reduce the potential for misalignment of proposed garage door openings, we recommend
a grade beam be provided at each garage door opening. This grade beam should be designed in
accordance with the structural engineer’s requirements and have a minimum reinforcement of two No. 4
rebar (one top and one bottom).
Horizontal loads acting on foundations and stem walls cast in open excavations against undisturbed native
soil or against properly placed and compacted fill will be resisted by friction acting along the base of the
footing and by passive earth pressures against the side of the footing and stem wall. The frictional
resistance acting along the base of footings founded on suitable foundation soils may be computed using a
coefficient of friction equal to 0.35 with the normal dead load. Passive earth pressures acting against the
side of footings and stem walls may be assumed to be equivalent to a fluid weighing 350 pounds per
cubic foot. Passive pressure in the upper 1.0-foot should be neglected unless confined by concrete slabs-
on-grade or asphaltic pavement. The values given above may be increased by one-third for transient wind
or seismic loads.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
13
7.3 Foundation Design – Parking Structure
As noted above, a rigid mat foundation can be used for the support of the proposed parking structure at
the site, provided the mat foundation is bearing upon at least 3 feet of fill soils that are properly placed
and compacted in accordance with the recommendations contained herein. When properly designed and
constructed, a structural mat foundation system can be expected to support high structural loads and
provide relatively uniform settlement across a structure. Mat foundations should be properly reinforced
to form a relatively rigid structural unit in accordance with the structural engineer’s design. For designing
a mat foundation, we recommend using an uncorrected modulus of subgrade reaction of 225 pounds per
cubic inch (pci). For large foundations, the modulus is typically reduced by 75 percent (i.e., to 56 pci).
The mat foundation may also be designed for a maximum bearing pressure of 1,500 psf with a one third
increase for transient loadings. Mat foundations should be reinforced in accordance with structural
considerations.
7.4 Settlement
EEI estimates total static settlement of each foundation system as recommended above to be less than 1
inch. Differential settlement is estimated to be approximately ½-inch or less between structural elements.
7.5 Footing Setbacks
All footings should maintain a minimum seven-foot horizontal setback from the base of the footing to any
descending slope. This distance is measured from the outside footing face at the bearing elevation.
Footings should maintain a minimum horizontal setback of H/3 (H=slope height) from the base of the
footing to the descending slope face. This setback distance should not be less than seven feet and need
not be greater than 40 feet.
Footings adjacent to drainage swales, underground utilities (if any) or within 10 feet of stormwater
devices should be deepened to a minimum of 6-inches below the invert of the adjacent unlined swale or
utilities. Footings near planned stormwater devices (bioswales) that are lined may be deepened to a
maximum of 30 -inches. This distance is measured from the footing face at the bearing elevation.
Footings for structures adjacent to retaining walls should be deepened so as to extend below a 1:1
projection from the heel of the wall. Alternatively, walls may be designed to accommodate structural
loads from buildings or appurtenances as described in the retaining wall section of this report.
7.6 Construction
The following foundation construction considerations are presented as minimum recommendations from a
soils engineering standpoint. Laboratory test results indicate the onsite soils swell (expansion) potential is
very low. During grading of the site, we recommend that no potentially expansive soils material (i.e.,
possessing an Expansion Index > 20) be placed within 24-inches of finish grade, if possible. Design
parameters provided herein, however, assume that finish grade soil materials will have a very low
expansion potential.
Recommendations by the project's design-structural engineer or architect, which may exceed the soils
engineer's recommendations, should take precedence over the following minimum considerations. Final
foundation design should be provided based on the expansion potential of the near surface soils
encountered during grading.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
14
7.7 Concrete Slab-on-Grade
Concrete slabs-on-grade for the proposed residential structures should be a minimum of 4-inches in
thickness. Floor slabs should be suitably reinforced and jointed (in accordance with Structural Engineer's
recommendations) so that a small amount of independent movement can occur without causing damage.
Based on the encountered geotechnical conditions, we recommend that floor slabs be reinforced with No.
3 bars spaced on 18-inch centers (each way). The contractor should take the appropriate precautions to
make sure that the reinforcement is placed and maintained within the middle one-third of the slab.
Control joints should be provided to help reduce the potential for random cracking. Slabs should be
underlain by a 4-inch thick capillary break layer consisting of clean sand (Sand Equivalent of at least 30)
or rounded fine gravel (pea gravel). Where moisture condensation is undesirable, we recommend that the
architect and/or structural engineer follow the guidelines of ACI 302.2R-06 for the design of measures for
under slab moisture protection and the development of appropriate specifications. To reduce the potential
for buildup of hydrostatic pressures, the free draining material under the slabs should have positive
drainage with no low lying areas (i.e., depressions) created.
It should be noted that the above recommendation is based on soil support characteristics only. The
structural engineer should design the actual slab and beam reinforcement based on actual loading
conditions and possible concrete shrinkage.
Exterior slabs, such as walkways and driveways, can be adequately grade supported on firm natural
materials (i.e., alluvium) or documented structural fill, being a minimum of 12-inches in thickness, which
is placed and compacted in accordance with the recommendations contained herein.
In preparation for slab or flatwork construction, the earthwork contractor should ensure that the onsite
soils have been prepared as recommended and that field density tests have been performed to adequately
document the relative compaction of the structural fill. Preparation of the native soils should be
documented prior to placement of aggregate, structural components and/or fill.
Some minor cracking of slabs can be expected due to shrinkage. The potential for this slab cracking can
be reduced by careful control of water/cement ratios in the concrete. The contractor should take
appropriate curing precautions during the pouring of concrete in hot or windy weather to reduce the
potential for cracking of slabs. We recommend that a slipsheet (or equivalent) be utilized if grouted fill,
tile, or other crack-sensitive floor covering is planned directly on concrete slabs. All slabs should be
designed in accordance with structural considerations.
All dedicated exterior flatwork should conform to standards provided by the governing agency including
section composition, supporting material thickness and any requirements for reinforcing steel. Concrete
mix proportions and construction techniques, including the addition of water and improper curing, can
adversely affect the finished quality of the concrete and result in cracking and spalling of the slab. We
recommend that all placement and curing be performed in accordance with procedures outlined by the
American Concrete Institute and/or Portland Cement Association. Special consideration should be given
to concrete placed and cured during hot or cold weather conditions. Proper control joints should be
provided to reduce the potential for damage resulting from shrinkage.
As discussed above, laboratory testing of the upper soils yielded a soluble sulfate concentration of 0.003
percent, indicating a negligible corrosion potential to concrete. Chloride concentration of the tested
sample was reported at 0.002 percent, indicating that the upper soils possess a low potential for corrosion
of steel reinforcement in concrete. As such, Type II cement can be used in concrete elements that will be
in contact with the upper soils.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
15
7.8 Retaining Walls
The design parameters provided below assume that non-expansive select material (such as gravel
wrapped in filter fabric) is used to backfill any retaining walls. If expansive soils are used to backfill the
proposed walls, increased active and at-rest earth pressures will need to be utilized for retaining wall
design, and can be provided upon request. Building walls below grade should be waterproofed or damp-
proofed, depending on the degree of moisture protection desired. The foundation system for retaining
walls should be designed in accordance with the recommendations presented in the preceding sections of
this report, as appropriate. Footings should be embedded a minimum of 18-inches below adjacent finish
grade (excluding 6-inch landscape layer), and should be designed based on an allowable soil bearing
value of 2,500 psf. This can be increased by one-third for loads of short duration, including wind and
seismic forces. There should be no increase in bearing for footing width.
The design active earth pressure on a retaining wall may be considered equivalent to that produced by a
fluid weighing 35 pounds per cubic foot (pcf). This design equivalent fluid pressure of 35 pcf is
considered appropriate for cantilevered walls retaining non-expansive soils with a level ground surface,
subject to lateral deflection at distances above grade due to lateral earth pressures. A safety factor for
sliding and overturning of 1.5 is typically prescribed for a cantilevered structure as described. All
retaining structures should be fully free draining. Restrained walls (such as basement walls or re-entrant
corners), with a level backfill, should be designed for an equivalent fluid pressure of 55 pcf for at rest
lateral earth pressure.
For resistance to lateral loads, an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.35 between the base of the
foundation elements and underlying material is recommended. In addition, an allowable passive
resistance equal to an equivalent fluid weighing 350 pcf acting against the foundation may be used to
resist lateral forces. Passive pressure in the upper 1.0-foot should be neglected unless confined by
concrete slabs-on-grade or asphaltic pavement. These values may be increased by one-third for transient
wind or seismic loads.
Adequate subdrainage should be provided behind all retaining walls. The subdrainage system should
consist of a minimum of a four-inch diameter perforated PVC pipe (schedule 40 or approved equivalent)
placed at the base of the retaining wall and surrounded by 3/4-inch clean crushed rock wrapped in a
Mirafi 140N filter fabric (or approved equivalent). The crushed rock wrapped in fabric should be at least
12-inches wide and extend from the base of the wall to within two feet of the ground surface. The upper
two feet of backfill should consist of compacted native soil. The retaining wall drainage system should be
sloped to an outlet into the storm drain system or other appropriate facility. If proposed, geotechnical
design parameters can be provided for reinforced or MSE type walls (i.e., Keystone, Loffel, Earthstone,
Geogrid, etc.).
8.0 PRELIMINARY PAVEMENT DESIGN RECOMMENDATIONS
8.1 Rigid and Flexible Non Pervious Pavement
Deleterious material, excessively wet or dry pockets, concentrated zones of oversized rock fragments, and
any other unsuitable yielding materials encountered during grading should be removed. Once compacted
fill and/or native soils are brought to the proposed pavement subgrade elevations, the subgrade should be
proof-rolled in order to check for a uniform firm and unyielding surface. Representatives of the project
geotechnical engineer should observe all grading and fill placement.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
16
The upper 12-inches of pavement subgrade soils should be scarified; moisture conditioned to at least
optimum moisture content and compacted to at least 95 percent of the laboratory standard (ASTM
D1557). If loose or yielding materials are encountered during subgrade preparation, evaluation should be
performed by EEI. Aggregate base materials should be properly prepared (i.e., processed and moisture
conditioned) and compacted to at least 95 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by ASTM
D1557. Aggregate base should conform to Caltrans specifications for Class 2 aggregate base.
All pavement section changes should be properly transitioned. Although not anticipated, if adverse
conditions are encountered during the preparation of subgrade materials, special construction methods
may need to be employed. A representative of the project geotechnical engineer should be present for the
preparation of subgrade and aggregate base.
For design purposes we have assumed a Traffic Index (TI) of 5.0 for the proposed interior drive areas at
the site. This assumed TI should be verified as necessary by the Civil Engineer or Traffic Engineer.
Based on the results of our laboratory testing of representative samples of the upper soils, along with our
experience with similar soils in the general vicinity of the subject site, we have utilized an R-Value of 30
for the pavement subgrade during our calculations of pavement structural sections. The modulus of
subgrade reaction (K-Value) was estimated at 90 pounds per square inch per inch (psi/in) for an R-Value
of 30 (Caltrans, 1974). Flexible pavement design was calculated for the parking areas and drive areas
based on structural section requirements for asphaltic concrete in accordance with the guidelines
presented in the Caltrans Highway Design Manual. Rigid pavement was evaluated in accordance with
ACI 330R-08, based on average daily truck traffic value of 25.
TABLE 2
Preliminary Pavement Design Recommendations
Traffic Index (TI) Pavement Surface Aggregate Base Material (1)
5.0 3.0-inches Asphalt Concrete 5.5-inches
Trash Area and Concrete Pavement 6.0-inches Portland Cement Concrete (2) Optional
(1) R-Value of 78 for Caltrans Class II aggregate base
(2) Reinforcement and control joints placed in accordance with the structural engineer’s requirements
The recommended pavement sections provided above are intended as a minimum guideline. If thinner or
highly variable pavement sections are constructed, increased maintenance and repair could be expected.
If the ADT (average daily traffic) or ADTT (average daily truck traffic) increases beyond that intended,
as reflected by the assumed and provided traffic indices used for design, increased maintenance and repair
could be required for the pavement section. Final pavement design should be verified by testing of soils
exposed at subgrade after grading has been completed. If the upper three feet of soils are impacted, EEI
may be able to provide a thinner pavement section, assuming soils will have a higher R-Value.
8.2 Pervious Pavement
We understand that the use of a permeable interlocking concrete paving system (permeable pavers) as a
method to intercept, store and provide onsite disposal of stormwater runoff is being considered. The
following sections provide recommendations for both interlocking concrete pavements and pervious
concrete.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
17
8.2.1 Recommendations for Use of Pervious Interlocking Concrete Pavement Onsite
Our review of literature prepared by Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI, 2006) and
other entities indicates that pervious interlocking concrete pavements are generally installed
within areas subject to low volume traffic and pedestrian areas of a site.
In light of this, along with the information described above, we recommend the use of the
pervious interlocking paver system be limited to the low volume traffic areas, where lower
vehicular loads would be exerted. Based on design guidelines for pavement structural sections
recommended by the ICPI, a typical minimum pervious interlocking paver section for the
proposed pavement section would consist of 3-1/8-inch thick concrete pavers, over a 1-7/8-inch
thick bedding course of No. 8 sand, over a minimum 4-inch thick base layer consisting of No. 57
gravel, over a minimum 8-inch thick layer of No. 2 stone, on compacted subgrade soils. The
thicknesses of the base and subbase layers can be increased as warranted to accommodate the
required storage capacity, as determined by the civil engineer.
Other considerations that can affect the long term performance of the pervious interlocking
concrete paver system in both the low traffic volume and main drive/entry areas include the
proper placement and compaction of the No. 2 rock and aggregate base layers, the placement of
the pavers in accordance with industry guidelines and the placement of adequate edge constraints
for the pavers as per the guidelines of the Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute.
The recommended pavement sections provided above are intended as a minimum guideline. If
thinner or highly variable pavement sections are constructed, increased maintenance and repair
could be expected. If the ADT (average daily traffic) or ADTT (average daily truck traffic)
increases beyond that intended, as reflected by the assumed and provided traffic index used for
design, increased maintenance and repair could be required for the pavement section. Final
pavement design should be checked by testing of soils exposed at subgrade after grading has been
completed.
8.2.2 Recommendations for Use of Pervious Concrete Pavement Onsite
We understand that pervious concrete is currently being considered for use within the pavement
areas at the site. Based on the geotechnical conditions encountered, we recommend that the
pervious concrete be constructed in accordance with manufacturer’s guidelines and specifications
with a thickness of at least 6-inches. The placement of at least 4 inches of ASTM No. 57 rock
over at least 8-inches of ASTM No. 2 rock beneath the pervious concrete/grasscrete is anticipated
to provide adequate support of vehicular loads. The actual thickness of these underlayment
materials should be determined based on the storage capacity required for collected storm water
from a design precipitation event.
9.0 DEVELOPMENT RECOMMENDATIONS
9.1 Landscape Maintenance and Planting
Water is known to decrease the physical strength of earth materials, significantly reducing stability by
high moisture conditions. Surface drainage away from foundations and graded slopes should be
maintained. Only the volume and frequency of irrigation necessary to sustain plant life should be applied.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
18
Consideration should be given to selecting lightweight, deep rooted types of landscape vegetation which
require low irrigation that are capable of surviving the local climate. From a soils engineering viewpoint,
“leaching” of the onsite soils is not recommended for establishing landscaping. If landscape soils are
processed for the addition of amendments, the processed soils should be re-compacted to at least 90
percent relative compaction (based on ASTM D1557).
9.2 Site Drainage
Positive site drainage should be maintained at all times. Drainage should not flow uncontrolled over
slopes or the subject parcel. Runoff should be channeled away from slopes and structures and not
allowed to pond and/or seep uncontrolled into the ground. Pad drainage should be directed toward an
acceptable outlet. Although not required, roof gutters and down spouts may be considered to control roof
drainage, discharging a minimum of ten feet from the proposed structures, or into a subsurface drainage
system. Consideration should be given to eliminating open bottom planters directly adjacent to proposed
structures for a minimum distance of ten feet. As an alternative, closed-bottom type planters could be
utilized, with a properly designed drain outlet placed in the bottom of the planter.
9.3 Site Runoff Considerations-Stormwater Disposal Systems
It is EEI understanding that current plans call for runoff generated from the development to be disposed
of in engineered subsurface facilities onsite. We understand that design for such devices including
bioretention facilities are based on direct infiltration into the underlying earth materials.
9.3.1 Percolation Testing
During our subsurface exploration at the site, EEI conducted percolation testing in our
exploratory borings B-1 (P-1), and B-2 (P-2), which were drilled in readily accessible locations,
or as close as practical to some of the areas proposed for stormwater facilities on the site. Our
testing was performed at approximate depths of 7.5 feet and 10 feet below the existing ground
surface. A minimum 2-inch layer of ½-inch diameter crushed gravel was placed at the bottom of
the excavation prior to testing. The approximate locations of our boring/percolation tests are
provided on Figure 3.
Percolation testing was conducted by one of EEI’s field personnel under the guidance of a
California licensed engineering geologist and civil engineer with EEI. Percolation tests were
performed in two of the exploratory borings in general accordance with the County of Orange
procedures for percolation testing (which is based on procedures established by the County of
Riverside Department of Environmental Health). Results of the percolation tests are presented
herein. The locations of the exploratory trenches/percolation tests are presented on the Boring
Location Map - Figure 3.
Percolation test locations were pre-soaked by pouring at least 12-inches of water into the
excavation. Each of the two percolation test holes conformed to the “sandy soil” test, where two
consecutive readings show that at least 6 inches of water seeps away in less than 25 minutes.
Consequently, each test was run for approximately one hour, with readings generally taken at
approximately 10 minute intervals. The reading obtained from the final 10 minute interval was
used to calculate the percolation rate for that test hole. Upon conclusion of testing, the test
excavation was backfilled. Results of percolation testing are presented in the following table,
Table 3.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
19
We note that a soil profile’s percolation rate is not the same as its infiltration rate. Therefore, the
measured/calculated percolation rate was converted to an estimated infiltration rate utilizing the
Porchet Method (Ritzema, 1994). The following table presents the calculated percolation rates
and corresponding infiltration rates for each of the two test holes.
TABLE 3
Summary of Percolation Testing and Estimated Infiltration Rates
Location and depth
(feet below existing
grade)
Measured Percolation
Rate (min/in)
Estimated Infiltration Rate
(in/hr)
P1, @10’ 0.39 6.2
P2, @7.5’ 1.14 2.8
Based on the results of our percolation study, we recommend that design of the proposed
retention basin incorporate a maximum infiltration rate of 3.0 inches per hour. The design of the
retention basin should be in accordance with County of Orange guidelines and should utilize an
appropriate factor of safety.
It is recommended that retention/disposal devices be situated at least three times their depth, or a
minimum of 10 feet (whichever is greater), from the outside bottom edge of structural
foundations. Structural foundations include (but are not limited to) buildings, loading docks,
retaining walls, and screen walls.
9.3.2 Stormwater Management Plan
If a Stormwater Management Plan (SWMP) for the site will be required by the City of Anaheim,
the following items are considerations that should be incorporated into the SWMP:
• During and following and grading at the site, the contractor should incorporate the
appropriate Best Management Practice (BMP) devices to reduce the potential for erosion and
sediment transport as low as practical. Such devices can include (but are not necessarily
limited to) the placement of sand bags, straw bales, geotextiles, fiber rolls and check dams in
graded areas that may be subject to erosion and/or sediment transport.
Measures to mitigate the potential for post-construction erosion at the site are presented in
Section 9.1 and 9.2 of this report.
• As noted above, our subsurface exploration encountered materials comprising Quaternary age
alluvium. No groundwater was encountered in any of our exploratory borings. Soil in the
vicinity of the site is identified by the United States Department of Agriculture - Soil
Conservation Service as The Metz series consists of very deep, somewhat excessively drained
soils that formed in alluvial material from mixed, but dominantly sedimentary rocks. Metz
soils are on floodplains and alluvial fans and have slopes of 0 to 15 percent. These soils are
somewhat excessively drained; have negligible to low runoff; and moderately rapid
permeability. Our review of the United States Department of Agriculture’s soil survey for
Orange County (USDA, 1978) indicates that the soil in the vicinity of the site is referred to as
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
20
the loamy sand of the Metz Series (USDA, 1978). According to the USDA’s Soil Survey
(1978), the loamy sand of the Metz Series exhibits a moderately low to high permeability,
which is on the order of 0.14 to 1.98 inches per hour. Consequently, it appears that these
materials can be expected to adequately accommodate infiltration devices.
• It appears that the use of Low Impact Development (LID) site design BMPs can be utilized to
reduce the potential for pollutants entering the storm drainage system. Such BMPs can
include (but are not necessarily limited to) the utilization of pervious sidewalks, pavements
and flatwork in areas where pedestrian or light duty traffic is planned, utilizing roof gutters
and downspouts to direct roof runoff into landscaped areas as opposed to directing the runoff
onto impermeable surfaces, direct runoff from sidewalks and roads toward landscaped areas
where practical and utilize drought tolerant vegetation in landscaped areas if practical.
• All stormwater disposal systems, including pervious pavement areas should be checked and
maintained on regular intervals.
• Stormwater devices including bioswales that are located closer than 10 feet from any
foundations/footings should be lined with an impermeable membrane to reduce the potential
for saturation of foundation soils (also refer to Section 7.3).
9.4 Additional Site Improvements
Recommendations for additional grading, exterior concrete flatwork design and construction can be
provided upon request. If in the future, additional property improvements were planned for the site,
recommendations concerning the design and construction of improvements would be provided upon
request.
9.5 Trenching
All temporary excavations for grading purposes and installation of underground utilities should be
constructed in accordance with OSHA guidelines and local safety codes. Temporary excavations over
five feet in height should be evaluated by the project engineer, and could require shoring, sloping, or a
combination thereof. Temporary excavations within the onsite materials should be stable at 1:1
inclinations for cuts less than 10 feet in height.
Footing trench excavations for structures and walls should be observed and approved by a representative
of the project soils engineer prior to placing reinforcement. Footing trench spoil and excess soils
generated from utility trench excavations should be compacted to a minimum relative compaction of 90
percent (based on ASTM D1557) if not removed from the site. All excavations should conform to OSHA
and local safety codes.
9.6 Utility Backfill
Fill around the pipe should be placed in accordance with details shown on the drawings, and should be
placed in layers not to exceed 8-inches loose (unless otherwise approved by the geotechnical engineer)
and compacted to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined in accordance with
ASTM D1557 (Modified Proctor). The geotechnical engineer should approve all backfill material. Select
material should be used when called for on the drawings, or when recommended by the geotechnical
engineer. Care should be taken during backfill and compaction operations to maintain alignment and
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
21
prevent damage to the joints. The backfill should be kept free from stones, chunks of highly plastic clay,
or other objectionable material. Backfill soils should be non-expansive, non-corrosive, and compatible
with native earth materials. Backfill materials and testing should be in accordance with the California
Building Code (CBC, 2010) and the grading ordinances of the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange.
Pipe backfill areas should be graded and maintained in such a condition that erosion or saturation will not
damage the pipe bed or backfill. Flooding trench backfill is not recommended. Heavy equipment should
not be operated over any pipe until it has been properly backfilled with a minimum two to three feet of
cover. The utility trench should be systematically backfilled to allow maximum time for natural
settlement. Backfill should not occur over porous, wet, or spongy subgrade surfaces. Should these
conditions exist, the areas should be removed, replaced and recompacted.
10.0 PLAN REVIEW
Once detailed site and grading plans are available, they should be submitted to this office for review and
comment, to reduce the potential for discrepancies between plans and recommendations presented herein.
If conditions were found to differ substantially from those stated, appropriate recommendations would be
provided. Additional field studies may be warranted.
11.0 LIMITATIONS
This geotechnical evaluation has been conducted in accordance with generally accepted geotechnical
engineering principles and practices. Findings provided herein have been derived in accordance with
current standards of practice, and no warranty is expressed or implied. Standards of practice are subject
to change with time. This report has been prepared for the sole use of Shopoff Advisors, LP (Client),
within a reasonable time from its authorization. Site conditions, land use (both onsite and offsite), or
other factors may change as a result of manmade influences, and additional work may be required with
the passage of time.
This evaluation should not be relied upon by other parties without the express written consent of EEI and
the Client; therefore, any use or reliance upon this geotechnical evaluation by a party other than the Client
should be solely at the risk of such third party and without legal recourse against EEI, its employees,
officers, or directors, regardless of whether the action in which recovery of damages is brought or based
upon contract, tort, statue, or otherwise. The Client has the responsibility to see that all parties to the
project, including the designer, contractor, subcontractor, and building official, etc. are aware of this
report in its complete form. This report contains information that may be used in the preparation of
contract specifications; however, the report is not designed as a specification document, and may not
contain sufficient information for use without additional assessment. EEI assumes no responsibility or
liability for work or testing performed by others. In addition, this report may be subject to review by the
controlling authorities.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
22
12.0 REFERENCES
American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2005, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other
Structures, ASCE Document ASCE/SEI 7-05.
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), 2008, Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Volume
04.08, Construction: Soil and Rock (I), Standards D 420 - D 5876.
Anaheim, City of, Anaheim General Plan, Safety Element, pp. S-1 through S-34.
Blake, T., 2000, “EQFAULT, version 3.0”, a Computer Program for Probabilistic Estimation of Peak
Acceleration from 3-D Fault Sources,” Thomas F. Blake Computer Services and Software, Newbury
Park, California.
California Building Code (CBC), 2010, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2,
California Building Standards Commission, Based on 2009 International Building Code; 2010 California
Historical Building Code, Title 24, Part 8; and 2010 California Existing Building Code, Title 24, Part 10,
effective January 1.
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 1974, Highway Design Manual, dated October 1,
1974.
California Department of Water Resources, Water Data Library (WDL), Website
(http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary), accessed May 2012.
California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1997, (revised 2001), Seismic Hazard Zone Report
for the Anaheim and Newport Beach7.5-Minute Quadrangles, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03, 50p. (plus
plates).
California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 1998, State of California Seismic Hazard Zones,
Anaheim Quadrangle, Scale 1:24,000, Liquefaction Zones Released 1997, Landslide Zones Released
1998.
California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 2000, California Department of Conservation,
Digital Images of Official Maps of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones of California, Southern
Region, DMG CD 2000-003.
California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 2008, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating
Seismic Hazards in California, Special Publication 117, adopted March 13, 1997, revised and re-adopted
September 11, 2008.
California Geological Survey (CGS), 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces Note 36, Electronic Copy,
Revised December 2002.
CivilTech Software (CivilTech), 2003, LiquefyPro: Liquefaction and Settlement Analysis, Version 5 and
Later, dated February 3.
DeLORME, 1999, 3-D TopoQuads, California South, Region 7.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
23
Google Earth®, 2011, Version 6.0.
Hart, E.W., and Bryant, W.A. (Hart and Bryant), 1997, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California:
California Department of Conservation, Division of Mines and Geology, Special Publication 42.
Interlocking Concrete Pavement Institute (ICPI), 2006, Permeable Interlocking Concrete Pavements,
Third Edition, 48p.
Jennings, C.W., 1994, Fault Activity Map of California and Adjacent Areas: California Division of Mines
and Geology, Map Sheet No. 6, scale 1:750,000.
Jennings, C.W. and Bryant, W.A., 2010, Fault Activity Map of California, California Geological Survey
(CGS), California Geologic Data Map Series, Map No. 6.
Morton, P.K. and Miller, R.V., 1981, Geologic Map of Orange County, California Showing Mines and
Mineral Deposits, California division of Mines and Geology Bulletin 204, Plate 1, Scale 1:48,000.
Ritzema, H.P., 1994, Drainage Principles and Applications, International Institute for Land Reclamation
and Improvement (ILRI), Publication 16, 2nd Revised Edition, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Sowers and Sowers, 1970, Unified Soil Classification System (After U. S. Waterways Experiment Station
and ASTM 02487-667) in Introductory Soil Mechanics, New York.
State Water Resources Control Board, Website, GeoTracker database
(http://www.geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/), accessed January 2012.
Tokimatsu, K. and Seed, H.B., 1997, “Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking,”
American Society of Civil Engineers Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, Vol. 113, No. 8, pp. 861-878.
United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service (USDA), 1978, Soil Survey of
Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, California.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1965, USGS 7.5 Minute Series Topographic Map, Anaheim
Quadrangle, California-Orange County, scale 1:24,000.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2002, Earthquake Hazards Program, Interpolated Probalistic
Ground Motion for the Conterminous 48 States, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/research/hazmaps/design/.
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
FIGURES
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
APPENDIX A
SOIL CLASSIFICATION CHART AND BORING LOGS
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
APPENDIX B
LABORATORY TEST DATA
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
APPENDIX C
LIQUEFACTION ANALYSIS
Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation – Proposed Residential Development July 3, 2012
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418.4
APPENDIX D
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
2195 Faraday Avenue • Suite K • Carlsbad, California 92008-7207 • Ph: 760-431-3747 • Fax: 760-431-3748 • www.eeitiger.com
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
GENERAL
These guidelines present general procedures and recommendations for earthwork and grading as required
on the approved grading plans, including preparation of areas to be filled, placement of fill and
installation of subdrains and excavations. The recommendations contained in the geotechnical report are
applicable to each specific project, are part of the earthwork and grading guidelines and would supersede
the provisions contained hereafter in the case of conflict. Observations and/or testing performed by the
consultant during the course of grading may result in revised recommendations which could supersede
these guidelines or the recommendations contained in the geotechnical report. Figures A through O are
provided at the back of this appendix, exhibiting generalized cross sections relating to these guidelines.
The contractor is responsible for the satisfactory completion of all earthworks in accordance with
provisions of the project plans and specifications. The project soil engineer and engineering geologist
(geotechnical consultant) or their representatives should provide observation and testing services, and
geotechnical consultation throughout the duration of the project.
EARTHWORK OBSERVATIONS AND TESTING
Geotechnical Consultant
Prior to the commencement of grading, a qualified geotechnical consultant (a soil engineer and
engineering geologist) should be employed for the purpose of observing earthwork procedures and testing
the fills for conformance with the recommendations of the geotechnical report, the approved grading
plans, and applicable grading codes and ordinances.
The geotechnical consultant should provide testing and observation so that determination may be made
that the work is being completed as specified. It is the responsibility of the contractor to assist the
consultant and keep them aware of work schedules and predicted changes, so that the consultant may
schedule their personnel accordingly.
All removals, prepared ground to receive fill, key excavations, and subdrains should be observed and
documented by the project engineering geologist and/or soil engineer prior to placing any fill. It is the
contractor’s responsibility to notify the engineering geologist and soil engineer when such areas are ready
for observation.
Earthwork and Grading Guidelines
2
Laboratory and Field Tests
Maximum dry density tests to determine the degree of compaction should be performed in
accordance with American Standard Testing Materials test method ASTM designation D-1557-
78. Random field compaction tests should be performed in accordance with test method ASTM
designations D-1556-82, D-2937 or D-2922 & D-3017, at intervals of approximately two (2) feet
of fill height per 10,000 sq. ft. or every one thousand cubic yards of fill placed. These criteria
would vary depending on the soil conditions and the size of the project. The location and
frequency of testing would be at the discretion of the geotechnical consultant
Contractor’s Responsibility
All clearing, site preparation, and earthwork performed on the project should be conducted by the
contractor, with observation by geotechnical consultants and staged approval by the appropriate
governing agencies. It is the contractor’s responsibility to prepare the ground surface to receive
the fill to the satisfaction of the soil engineer, and to place, spread, moisture condition, mix and
compact the fill in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer. The contractor
should also remove all major deleterious material considered unsatisfactory by the soil engineer.
It is the sole responsibility of the contractor to provide adequate equipment and methods to
accomplish the earthwork in accordance with applicable grading guidelines, codes or agency
ordinances, and approved grading plans. Sufficient watering apparatus and compaction equipment
should be provided by the contractor with due consideration for the fill material, rate of
placement, and climatic conditions. If, in the opinion of the geotechnical consultant,
unsatisfactory conditions such as questionable weather, excessive oversized rock, deleterious
material or insufficient support equipment are resulting in a quality of work that is not acceptable,
the consultant will inform the contractor, and the contractor is expected to rectify the conditions,
and if necessary, stop work until conditions are satisfactory.
The contractor will properly grade all surfaces to maintain good drainage and prevent ponding of
water. The contractor will take action to control surface water and to prevent erosion control
measures that have been installed.
SITE PREPARATION
All vegetation including brush, trees, thick grasses, organic debris, and other deleterious material
should be removed and disposed of offsite, and must be concluded prior to placing fill. Existing
fill, soil, alluvium, colluvium, or rock materials determined by the soil engineer or engineering
geologist as unsuitable for structural in-place support should be removed prior to fill placement.
Depending upon the soil conditions, these materials may be reused as compacted fills. Any
materials incorporated as part of the compacted fills should be approved by the soil engineer.
Any underground structures such as cesspools, cisterns, mining shafts, tunnels, septic tanks,
wells, pipelines, or other structures not located prior to grading are to be removed or treated in a
manner recommended by the soil engineer. Soft, dry, spongy, highly fractured, or otherwise
unsuitable ground extending to such a depth that surface processing cannot adequately improve
the condition should be over excavated down to firm ground and approved by the soil engineer
before compaction and filling operations continue. Over excavated and processed soils which
have been properly mixed and moisture-conditioned should be recompacted to the minimum
relative compaction as specified in these guidelines.
Earthwork and Grading Guidelines
Existing ground which is determined to be satisfactory for support of the fills should be scarified
to a minimum depth of six (6) inches, or as directed by the soil engineer. After the scarified
ground is brought to optimum moisture (or greater) and mixed, the materials should be
compacted as specified herein. If the scarified zone is greater than 6 inches in depth, it may be
necessary to remove the excess and place the material in lifts restricted to six (6) inches in
compacted thickness.
Existing grind which is not satisfactory to support compacted fill should be over excavated as
required in the geotechnical report or by the onsite soils engineer and/or engineering geologists.
Scarification, discing, or other acceptable form of mixing should continue until the soils are
broken down and free of large fragments or clods, until the working surface is reasonably uniform
and free from ruts, hollows, hummocks, or other uneven features which would inhibit compaction
as described above.
Where fills are to be placed on ground with slopes steeper than 5:1 (horizontal to vertical)
gradient, the ground should be benched. The lowest bench, which will act as a key, should be a
minimum of 12 feet wide and should be at least two (2) feet deep into competent material,
approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist. In fill over cut slope conditions, the
recommended minimum width of the lowest bench or key is at least 15 feet with the key
excavated on competent material, as designated by the Geotechnical Consultant. As a general
rule, unless superseded by the Soil Engineer, the minimum width of fill keys should be
approximately equal to one-half (½) the height of the slope.
Standard benching is typically four feet (minimum) vertically, exposing competent material.
Benching may be used to remove unsuitable materials, although it is understood that the vertical
height of the bench may exceed four feet. Pre stripping may be considered for removal of
unsuitable materials in excess of four feet in thickness.
All areas to receive fill, including processed areas, removal areas, and toe of fill benches should
be observed and approved by the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist prior to placement of
fill. Fills may then be properly placed and compacted until design grades are attained.
COMPACTED FILLS
Earth materials imported or excavated on the property may be utilized as fill provided that each
soil type has been accepted by the soil engineer. These materials should be free of roots, tree
branches, other organic matter or other deleterious materials. All unsuitable materials should be
removed from the fill as directed by the soil engineer. Soils of poor gradation, undesirable
expansion potential, or substandard strength characteristics may be designated unsuitable by the
consultant and may require mixing with other earth materials to serve as a satisfactory fill
material.
Fill materials generated from benching operations should be dispersed throughout the fill area.
Benching operations should not result in the benched material being placed only within a single
equipment width away from the fill/bedrock contact.
3
Earthwork and Grading Guidelines
Oversized materials, defined as rock or other irreducible materials with a maximum size
exceeding 12 inches in one dimension, should not be buried or placed in fills unless the location
of materials and disposal methods are specifically approved by the soil engineer. Oversized
material should be taken offsite or placed in accordance with recommendations of the soil
engineer in areas designated as suitable for rock disposal. Oversized material should not be
placed vertically within 10 feet of finish grade or horizontally within 20 feet of slope faces.
To facilitate trenching, rock should not be placed within the range of foundation excavations or
future utilities unless specifically approved by the soil engineer and/or the representative
developers.
If import fill material is required for grading, representative samples of the material should be
analyzed in the laboratory by the soil engineer to determine its physical properties. If any
material other than that previously analyzed is imported to the fill or encountered during grading,
analysis of this material should be conducted by the soil engineer as soon as practical.
Fill material should be placed in areas prepared to receive fill in near-horizontal layers that should
not exceed six (6) inches compacted in thickness. The soil engineer may approve thicker lifts if
testing indicates the grading procedures are such that adequate compaction is being achieved.
Each layer should be spread evenly and mixed to attain uniformity of material and moisture
suitable for compaction.
Fill materials at moisture content less than optimum should be watered and mixed, and “wet” fill
materials should be aerated by scarification, or should be mixed with drier material. Moisture
conditioning and mixing of fill materials should continue until the fill materials have uniform
moisture content at or above optimum moisture.
After each layer has been evenly spread, moisture-conditioned and mixed, it should be uniformly
compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of maximum density as determined by ASTM test
designation, D 1557-78, or as otherwise recommended by the soil engineer. Compaction
equipment should be adequately sized and should be reliable to efficiently achieve the required
degree of compaction.
Where tests indicate that the density of any layer of fill, or portion thereof, is below the required
relative compaction or improper moisture content, the particular layer or portion will be reworked
until the required density and/or moisture content has been attained. No additional fill will be
placed in an area until the last placed lift of fill has been tested and found to meet the density and
moisture requirements, and is approved by the soil engineer.
Compaction of slopes should be accomplished by over-building the outside edge a minimum of
three (3) feet horizontally, and subsequently trimming back to the finish design slope
configuration. Testing will be performed as the fill is horizontally placed to evaluate compaction
as the fill core is being developed. Special efforts may be necessary to attain the specified
compaction in the fill slope zone. Final slope shaping should be performed by trimming and
removing loose materials with appropriate equipment. A final determination of fill slope
compaction should be based on observation and/or testing of the finished slope face.
4
Earthwork and Grading Guidelines
If an alternative to over-building and cutting back the compacted fill slope is selected, then
additional efforts should be made to achieve the required compaction in the outer 10 feet of each
lift of fill by undertaking the following:
• Equipment consisting of a heavy short-shanked sheepsfoot should be used to roll
(horizontal) parallel to the slopes continuously as fill is placed. The sheepsfoot roller
should also be used to roll perpendicular to the slopes, and extend out over the slope to
provide adequate compaction to the face slope.
• Loose fill should not be spilled out over the face of the slope as each lift is compacted.
Any loose fill spilled over a previously completed slope face should be trimmed off or be
subject to re-rolling.
• Field compaction tests will be made in the outer two (2) to five (5) feet of the slope at
two (2) to three (3) foot vertical intervals, subsequent to compaction operations.
• After completion of the slope, the slope face should be shaped with a small dozer and
then re-rolled with a sheepsfoot to achieve compaction to near the slope face.
Subsequent to testing to verify compaction, the slopes should be grid-rolled to achieve
adequate compaction to the slope face. Final testing should be used to confirm
compaction after grid rolling.
• Where testing indicates less than adequate compaction, the contractor will be responsible
to process, moisture condition, mix and recompact the slope materials as necessary to
achieve compaction. Additional testing should be performed to verify compaction.
• Erosion control and drainage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer in
compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies, and/or in
accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer or engineering geologist.
EXCAVATIONS
Excavations and cut slopes should be observed and mapped during grading by the engineering
geologist. If directed by the engineering geologist, further excavations or over-excavation and
refilling of cut areas should be performed. When fills over cut slopes are to be graded, the cut
portion of the slope should be observed by the engineering geologist prior to placement of the
overlying fill portion of the slope. The engineering geologist should observe all cut slopes and
should be notified by the contractor when cut slopes are started.
If, during the course of grading, unanticipated adverse or potentially adverse geologic conditions
are encountered, the engineering geologist and soil engineer should investigate, evaluate and
make recommendations to mitigate (or limit) these conditions. The need for cut slope buttressing
or stabilizing should be based on as-grading evaluations by the engineering geologist, whether
anticipated previously or not.
Unless otherwise specified in soil and geological reports, no cut slopes should be excavated
higher or steeper than that allowed by the ordinances of controlling governmental agencies.
Additionally, short-term stability of temporary cut slopes is the contractor’s responsibility.
5
Earthwork and Grading Guidelines
Erosion control and drainage devices should be designed by the project civil engineer and should
be constructed in compliance with the ordinances of the controlling governmental agencies,
and/or in accordance with the recommendations of the soil engineer or engineering geologist.
SUBDRAIN INSTALLATION
Subdrains should be installed in accordance with the approved embedment material, alignment
and details indicated by the geotechnical consultant. Subdrain locations or construction materials
should not be changed or modified without approval of the geotechnical consultant. The soil
engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend and direct changes in subdrain line, grade
and drain material in the field, pending exposed conditions. The location of constructed
subdrains should be recorded by the project civil engineer.
COMPLETION
Consultation, observation and testing by the geotechnical consultant should be completed during
grading operations in order to state an opinion that all cut and filled areas are graded in
accordance with the approved project specifications.
After completion of grading and after the soil engineer and engineering geologist have finished
their observations, final reports should be submitted subject to review by the controlling
governmental agencies. No additional grading should be undertaken without prior notification of
the soil engineer and/or engineering geologist.
All finished cut and fill slopes should be protected from erosion, including but not limited to
planting in accordance with the plan design specifications and/or as recommended by a landscape
architect. Such protection and/or planning should be undertaken as soon as possible after
completion of grading.
ATTACHMENTS
Figure A – Transition Lot Detail Cut Lot
Figure B – Transition Lot Detail Cut - Fill
Figure C – Rock Disposal Pits
Figure D – Detail for Fill Slope Toeing out on a Flat Alluviated Canyon
Figure E – Removal Adjacent to Existing Fill
Figure F – Daylight Cut Lot Detail
Figure G – Skin Fill of Natural Ground
Figure H – Typical Stabilization Buttress Fill Design
Figure I – Stabilization Fill for Unstable Material Exposed in Portion of Cut Slope
Figure J – Fill Over Cut Detail
Figure K – Fill Over Natural Detail
Figure L – Oversize Rock Disposal
Figure M – Canyon Subdrain Detail
Figure N – Canyon Subdrain Alternate Details
Figure O – Typical Stabilization Buttress Subdrain Detail
Figure P – Retaining Wall Backfill
6
5' Minimum3' Minimum*Natural GradeOverexcavate and RecompactUnweathered Bedrock or Approved MaterialPad GradeCompacted FillTypical BenchingTRANSITION LOT DETAILCUT LOT – MATERIAL TYPE TRANSITION* The soils engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend deeper overexcavation in steep cut-fill transitions.Note: Figure not to scaleExpertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESTRANSITION LOT DETAILCUT LOT – MATERIAL TYPE TRANSITIONFIGURE A
Typical Benching* The soils engineer and/or engineering geologist may recommend deeper overexcavation in steep cut-fill transitions.5' MinimumNatural GradeOverexcavate and RecompactUnweathered Bedrock or Approved MaterialPad GradeCompacted FillTRANSITION LOT DETAILCUT – FILL – DAYLIGHT TRANSITIONRemove: Topsoil, Colluvium, or Unstable Material3' Minimum*Note: Figure not to scaleFIGURE BExpertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESTRANSITION LOT DETAILCUT – FILL – DAYLIGHT TRANSITION
ROCK DISPOSAL PITS
Note: (1) Large rock is defined as having a diameter larger than 3 feet in maximum size.
(2) Pit shall be excavated into compacted fill to a depth equal to half of the rock size.
(3) Granular soil shall be pushed into the pit and then flooded around the rock using a sheepsfoot to help with compaction.
(4) A minimum of 3 feet of compacted fill should be laid over each pit.
(5) Pits shall have at least 15 feet of separation between one another, horizontally.
(6) Pits shall be placed at least 20 feet from any fill slope.
(7) Pits shall be used only in deep fill areas.
Note: Figure not to scale
Size of excavation to be commensurate with rock size.
Compacted fill
Fill lifts compacted over rock after embedment
Granular material
Large Rock/Boulder
Expertise . . Service . . Solutions
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
ROCK DISPOSAL PITS
FIGURE C
DETAIL FOR FILL SLOPE TOEING OUT ON
FLAT ALLUVIATED CANYON
Note: Figure not to scale
Toe of slope as shown on grading plan
Original ground surface to be restored with compacted fill.
Backcut varies for deep removals. A
backcut shall not be made steeper than
a slope of 1:1 or as necessary for safety
considerations.1:1 m inim um
Compacted fill
Original ground surface
Anticipated alluvial removal depth per
soils engineer.
Provide a 1:1 minimum projection from the toe of the slope as shown on
the grading plan to the recommended depth. Factors such as slope height,
site conditions, and/or local conditions could demand shallower
projections.
FIGURE D
Expertise . . Service . . Solutions
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
DETAIL FOR FILL SLOPE TOEING OUT ON A FLAT
ALLUVIATED CANYON
REMOVAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING FILL
Note: Figure not to scale
Adjoining Canyon Fill
1:1 Slope
Proposed additional compacted fill
Compacted fill limits line
Temporary compacted
fill for drainage only
To be removed before placing additional compacted fill
Qaf (Existing compacted fill)
Qaf
Qal (To be removed)
Legend
Qaf - Artificial Fill
Qal - Alluvium
FIGURE E
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
REMOVAL ADJACENT TO EXISTING FILL
Expertise . . Service . . Solutions
Note: Figure not to scaleNote: (1) Subdrain and key width requirements shall be determined based on exposed subsurface conditions and the thickness of overburden.(2) Pad overexcavation and recompaction shall be completed if determined as necessary by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist.Expertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESDAYLIGHT CUT LOT DETAILFIGURE FDAYLIGHT CUT LOT DETAILFill slope shall be recompacted at a 2:1 ratio (this may increase or decrease the area of the pad)Remove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable materialOverexcavate and recompact fillAvoid and/or clean up spillage of materials on the natural slopeNatural GradeProposed finish grade3' minimum blanket fillBedrock or approved materialTypical benching2' minimum key depthMinimum 1:1 projection2% gradient
Note: Figure not to scaleNote: (1) The need and disposition of drains will be determined by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist based on site conditions.(2) Pad overexcavation and recompaction shall be completed if determined as necessary by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist.Expertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESSKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUNDFIGURE GSKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUND15' minimum key width2' minimum key depth3' minimum key depth3' minimumProposed finish gradeOriginal slopeProposed finish grade15' minimum to be maintained from proposed finish slope face to backcutRemove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable materialBedrock or approved materials
Note: Figure not to scaleTYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGNW = H/2 or a minimum of 15'3' minimum key depthBedrock4" diameter non-perforated outlet pipe and backdrain (see alternatives)Typical benchingBlanket fill if recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist15' minimum10' minimum25' maximumDesign finish slopeOutlets shall be spaced at 100' maximum intervals, and should extend 12" beyond the face of the slope at the finish of of rough grading2% gradient15' is typical1'-2' clearToeHeelButtress or sidehill fillExpertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESTYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGNFIGURE HGravel-fabric drain material
Note: Figure not to scaleNote: (1) The need and disposition of drains will be determined by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist based on site conditions.(2) Pad overexcavation and recompaction shall be completed if determined as necessary by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist.Expertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESSKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUNDFIGURE GSKIN FILL OF NATURAL GROUND15' minimum key width2' minimum key depth3' minimum key depth3' minimumProposed finish gradeOriginal slopeProposed finish grade15' minimum to be maintained from proposed finish slope face to backcutRemove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable materialBedrock or approved materials
Note: Figure not to scaleTYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGNW = H/2 or a minimum of 15'3' minimum key depthBedrock4" diameter non-perforated outlet pipe and backdrain (see alternatives)Typical benchingBlanket fill if recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist15' minimum10' minimum25' maximumDesign finish slopeOutlets shall be spaced at 100' maximum intervals, and should extend 12" beyond the face of the slope at the finish of of rough grading2% gradient15' is typical1'-2' clearToeHeelButtress or sidehill fillExpertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESTYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS FILL DESIGNFIGURE HGravel-fabric drain material
Note: Figure not to scaleNote: (1) Subdrains are required only if specified by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist.(2) “W” shall be the equipment width (15') for slope heights less than 25 feet. For slopes greater than 25 feet “W” shall be determined by the project soils engineer and/or the engineering geologist. “W” shall never be less than H/2.Expertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESSTABILIZATION FILL FOR UNSTABLE MATERIAL EXPOSED IN PORTION OF CUT SLOPEFIGURE ISTABILIZATION FILL FOR UNSTABLE MATERIAL EXPOSED IN PORTION OF CUT SLOPECompacted stabilization fillH1H2W1W21' minimum tilted backIf recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist, the remaining cut portion of the slope may require removal and replacement with compacted fill.Remove: unstable material15' minimumRemove unstable materialNatural SlopeProposed finished gradeUnweathered bedrock or approved material
Note: Figure not to scaleNote: The cut sectioin shall be excavated and evaluated by the soils engineer/engineering geologist prior to constructing the fill portion.Expertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESFILL OVER CUT DETAILFIGURE JFILL OVER CUT DETAILHMaintain minimum 15' fill section from backcut to face of finish slopeProposed gradeCut/Fill Contact: As shown on grading planCut/Fill Contact: As shown on as builtCut slopeOriginal topographyRemove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable materialCompacted fill3' minimumLowest bench width15' minimum or H/22' minimumBedrock or approved materialBench width may vary
Proposed GradeNote: Figures not to scaleCompacted FillMaintain Minimum 15' WidthSlope To Bench/BackcutToe of slope as shown on grading planBench Width May Vary3' Minimum15' Minimum key width2' X 3' Minimum key depth2' minimum in bedrock or approved materialBackcut VariesNatural slope to be restored with compacted fillProvide a 1:1 minimum projection from design toe of slope to toe of key as shown on as builtNote: (1) Special recommendations shall be provided by the soils engineer/engineering geologist where the natural slope approaches or exceeds the design slope ratio.(2) The need for and disposition of drains would be determined by the soils engineer/engineering geologist based upon exposed conditions.Expertise . . Service . . SolutionsEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESFILL OVER NATURAL DETAILSIDEHILL FILLFIGURE KRemove: Topsoil, colluvium, or unsuitable material4' MinimumFILL OVER NATURAL DETAILSIDEHILL FILL
OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL
View Normal to Slope Face
Bedrock or Approved Material
Proposed Finish Grade
Note: (1) One Equipment width or a minimum of 15 feet.
(2) Height and width may vary depending on rock size and type of equipment used. Length of windrow shall be no greater than 100 feet maximum.
(3) If approved by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist.
(4) Orientation of windrows may vary but shall be as recommended by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Unless recommended staggering of
windrows is not necessary.
(5) Areas shall be cleared for utility trenches, foundations, and swimming pools.
(6) Voids in windrows shall be filled by flooding granular soil into place. Granular soil shall be any soil which has a unified soil classification system
(Universal Building Code (UBC) 29-1). Designation of SM, SP, SW, GP, or GW.
(7) After fill between windrows is placed and compacted with the lift of fill covering windrow, windrow shall be proof rolled with a D-9 dozer or equivalent.
(8) Oversized rock is defined as larger than 12", and less than 4 feet in size.
(2)
10' minimum (5)
15' minimum (1)
(6)(7)
5' minimum (3)15' minimum 20' minimum
View Parallel to Slope Face
Bedrock or Approved Material
Proposed Finish Grade
100' maximum
10' minimum (5)(7)
5' minimum (3)
10' minimum
3' minimum (8)
Note: All distances are approximate
0 FT 18 FT 30 FT 60 FT
Approximate Scale: 1" = 30'
(4)
Expertise . . Service . . Solutions
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
OVERSIZE ROCK DISPOSAL
FIGURE L
CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL
Note: Alternatives, locations, and extent of subdrains should be determined by the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist during actual grading.
Note: Figures not to scale
Type A
Type B
Proposed Compacted Fill
Natural ground
Colluvium and alluvium (remove)
See alternatives (Figure N)
Typical benching
Proposed Compacted Fill
Natural ground
Colluvium and alluvium (remove)
See alternatives (Figure N)
FIGURE M
Expertise . . Service . . Solutions
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
CANYON SUBDRAIN DETAIL
Typical benching
CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS
Alternate 1: Perforated Pipe and Filter Material
Filter material: Minimum volume of 9 feet3/linear foot.
6" diameter ABS or PVC pipe or approved substitute with minimum
8 (¼” diameter) perforations per linear foot in bottom half of pipe.
ASTM D 2751, SDR 35 or ASTM D 1527, Schedule 40.
ASTM D 3034, SDR 35 or ASTM D 1785, Schedule 40.
For continuous run in excess of 500 feet use 8" diameter pipe.
6" Minimum
6" Minimum
6" Minimum
12" Minimum
Alternate 2: Perforated Pipe, Gravel and Filter Fabric
Minimum Overlap
Minimum Bedding
6"
4"
6" Minimum Cover Minimum Bedding 4"
6"
Note: Figures not to scale
Minimum Overlap
Gravel material 9 feet3/linear foot.
Perforated pipe: see alternate 1.
Gravel: Clean ¾” rock or approved substitute.
Filter Fabric: Mirafi 140 or approved substitute.
Filter Material
Sieve Size
1"
¾”
3/8"
No. 4
No. 8
No. 30
No. 50
No. 200
Percent Passing
100
90-100
40-100
25-40
18-33
5-15
0-7
0-3
FIGURE N
Expertise . . Service . . Solutions
EARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINES
CANYON SUBDRAIN ALTERNATE DETAILS
Note: Figures not to scaleTYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS SUBDRAIN DETAIL4" minimum pipe2' minimum2" minimum2" minimum2' minimum2" minimum4" minimum pipe3' minimumFilter Material: Minimum of 5 ft3/linear foot of pipe or 4 ft3/linear foot of pipe when placed in square cut trench.Filter MaterialSieve Size1"¾”3/8"No. 4No. 8No. 30No. 50No. 200Percent Passing10090-10040-10025-4018-335-150-70-3Note: (1) Trench for outlet pipes shall be backfilled with onsite soil.(2) Backdrains and lateral drains shall be located at the elevation of every bench drain. First drain shall be located at the elevation just above the lower lot grade. Additional drains may be required at the discretion of the soils engineer and/or engineering geologist. Alternative In Lieu Of Filter Material:Gravel may be encased in approved filter fabric. Filter fabric shall be mirafi 140 or equivalent. Filter fabric shall be lapped a minimum of 12" on all joints. Minimum 4" Diameter Pipe:ABS-ASTM D-2751, SDR 35 or ASTM D-1527 schedule 40 PVC-ASTM D-3034, SDR 35 or ASTM D-1785 schedule 40 with a crushing strength of 1,000 pounds minimum, and a minimum of 8 uniformly spaced perforations per foot of pipe installed with perforations at bottom of pipe. Provide cap at upstream end of pipe. Slope at 2% to outlet pipe. Outlet pipe shall be connected to the subdrain pipe with tee or elbow.Filter Material– Shall be of the following specification or an approved equivalent:Gravel- Shall be of the following specification or an approved equivalent:Filter MaterialSieve Size1½"No. 4No. 200Percent Passing100508Sand equivalent: Minimum of 50FIGURE OEARTHWORK AND GRADING GUIDELINESTYPICAL STABILIZATION BUTTRESS SUBDRAIN DETAILExpertise . . Service . . Solutions
2195 Faraday Avenue Suite KCarlsbad, California 92008-7207 Ph: 760-431-3747Fax: 760-431-3748www.eeitiger.com
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL
SITE ASSESSMENT
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue
APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28
Anaheim, California 92805
February 7, 2012
EEI Project Number SHO-71418
PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
Prepared for:
Mr. Brian Rupp
Shopoff Advisors, LP
2 Park Plaza, Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92614
Site location:
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue
APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28.
Anaheim, California 92805
Prepared and edited by:
Polly Ivers
Staff Scientist
Reviewed by:
Bernard A. Sentianin, PG 5530, REA I 3477
Principal Geologist
EEI
2195 Faraday Avenue, Suite K
Carlsbad, California 92008-7207
760-431-3747
EEI Project Number SHO-71418
TABLE OF CONTENTS
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION............................................................................................................i
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ........................................................................................................................ii
1.0 INTRODUCTION.................................................................................................................................1
1.1 Purpose.......................................................................................................................................1
1.2 Scope of Services.......................................................................................................................1
1.3 Reliance......................................................................................................................................1
2.0 PHYSIOGRAPHIC SETTING ............................................................................................................2
2.1 Site Description..........................................................................................................................2
TABLE 1 Current Tenant List..........................................................................................................2
2.2 Topography................................................................................................................................3
2.3 Regional and Local Geology......................................................................................................3
2.4 Regional and Local Hydrogeology ............................................................................................4
2.5 Hydrologic Flood Plain Information..........................................................................................4
3.0 SITE BACKGROUND .........................................................................................................................4
3.1 Site Ownership...........................................................................................................................4
3.2 Site History.................................................................................................................................5
3.2.1 Aerial Photograph Review and Historical Map Review............................................5
TABLE 2 Summary of Aerial Photograph Review.............................................................5
3.2.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps.....................................................................................6
3.2.3 City/County Directories.............................................................................................7
TABLE 3 Summary of City/County Directory Search .......................................................7
3.2.4 City of Anaheim Building Department Files .............................................................8
3.3 Regulatory Database Search.......................................................................................................9
3.3.1 Federal Databases.......................................................................................................9
3.3.2 State and Regional Sources......................................................................................10
3.4 Regulatory Agency Review .....................................................................................................13
3.4.1 City of Anaheim Fire Department............................................................................13
3.4.2 City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department..........................................................13
3.4.3 Orange County Health Care Agency........................................................................14
3.4.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control ................................................................14
3.4.5 State Water Resources Control Board......................................................................14
3.4.6 Review of Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources File............................15
3.4.7 National Pipeline Mapping System..........................................................................15
3.5 Interview with Current Property Owner...................................................................................15
3.5.1 Past or Present Uses Indicating Environmental Concern.........................................15
3.5.2 Deed Restrictions, Activity or Land Use Restrictions, or Environmental Liens......15
3.5.3 Presence of Hazardous Substances or Environmental Violations............................16
3.5.4 Environmental Investigations or Cleanups...............................................................16
3.5.5 Legal Proceedings....................................................................................................16
3.5.6 Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based Paint........................................17
3.6 User Provided Information.......................................................................................................17
3.6.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Use Limitations.............................................17
3.6.2 Specialized Knowledge............................................................................................17
3.6.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues........................................................17
3.6.4 Presence or Likely Presence of Contamination........................................................17
3.6.5 Other.........................................................................................................................18
TABLE OF CONTENTS (Continued)
3.7 Previous Assessments...............................................................................................................18
3.8 Other Environmental Issues .....................................................................................................20
3.8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials ................................................................................20
3.8.2 Lead-Based Paint......................................................................................................20
3.8.3 Radon .......................................................................................................................21
3.8.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls .......................................................................................21
4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ...............................................................................................................22
4.1 Purpose.....................................................................................................................................22
4.2 Subject Site...............................................................................................................................22
TABLE 4 – Summary of Site Reconnaissance...............................................................................24
4.3 Adjacent Properties ..................................................................................................................24
5.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS .............................................................................................................25
6.0 DATA GAPS ........................................................................................................................................25
6.1 Historical Data Gaps ................................................................................................................25
6.2 Regulatory Data Gaps ..............................................................................................................25
6.3 On-Site Data Gaps....................................................................................................................25
6.4 Deviations from ASTM Practices ............................................................................................25
7.0 CONCLUSIONS ..................................................................................................................................26
8.0 REFERENCES ....................................................................................................................................27
FIGURES:
Figure 1 – Site Location Map
Figure 2 – Aerial Site Map
APPENDICES:
Appendix A – Résumé of Environmental Professional
Appendix B – Preliminary Title Reports
Appendix C – Historical Aerial Photographs/ Topographic Maps/County Directory Search
Appendix D – Environmental Records Search
Appendix E – User Provided Information
Appendix F – Photographic Log
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Project Information: Commercial Property
EEI Project Number: SHO-71418
Site Information:
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue
APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28
Anaheim, California 92805
Site Access Contact: Brian Rupp (949) 231-5068
Consultant Information:
EEI
2195 Faraday Ave., Suite K
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Phone: 760.431.3747
Fax: 760.431.3748
E-mail Address: bsentianin@eeitiger.com
Inspection Date: January 19, 2012 Report Date: February 7, 2012
Client Information:
Mr. Brian Rupp
Shopoff Advisors, LP
2 Park Plaza, Suite 700
Irvine, CA 92614
Site Assessor:
Bernard A. Sentianin – Principal Geologist
EP Certification:
I declare that, to the best of my professional knowledge and belief, I meet the definition of Environmental
Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10 (Resume, Appendix A).
________________________________
Bernard A. Sentianin – Principal Geologist
AAI Certification:
We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the
nature, history, and setting of the subject property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate
inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312.
________________________________
Bernard A. Sentianin – Principal Geologist
i
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
At the request and authorization of Shopoff Advisors, LP (“Client”), EEI conducted a Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment (ESA) for the property located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella
Avenue, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California. The purpose of this Phase I ESA was to assess the
presence or likely presence of an existing, historical, or threatened release of any hazardous substances or
petroleum products into structures, soil, and/or groundwater beneath the subject property, to the extent
practical (i.e., recognized environmental conditions as delineated in ASTM E1527- 05).
The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street, in the City
of Anaheim, in northern County of Orange. The subject property encompasses approximately 13-acres on
four parcels identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27,
and 082-261-28. The subject property is occupied with 5 commercial buildings identified as: 905 and 915 E
Katella (APN 082-261-23); 917 E Katella (APN 082-261-24) Part of same large building as 905/915; 1005,
1015 and 1025 E Katella (APN 082-261-27); and 1105 E Katella (APN 082-261-28) Mr. Stox Restaurant.
The westernmost property (905-917) is the location of an approximately 175,000 square-foot (sf) industrial
building occupied with multiple tenants including Golden West Medical. The adjacent parcels to the east
(1015-1025) contain two approximately 15,000 sf industrial buildings with multiple tenants including Axxis
Motorsports. To the south of these buildings, is an approximately 10,000 sf restaurant, identified as Mr.
Stox”(1105), at the southeast corner of the overall property. Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005) is located
to the west of the restaurant and is utilized for storage. According to the City of Anaheim, the subject is
zoned as General Industrial and is located within the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) land use
designation.
The subject property is generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties to in all directions. It is
immediately bound by Omni Duct (1700 South Lewis Street) to the north, East Katella Avenue to the south, a
vacant lot and residential property to the east, and South Lewis Street to the west. A former gas station
(Former Unocal -1818 South Lewis Street) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis
Street),) is located to the southwest at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street.
Based on historical records such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, and City directories and building
records, the subject property was developed with orchards and a rural residence from at least 1938. The
property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the orchards were cleared. In 1969, the restaurant on
the southeast corner of the subject property was developed, and has been occupied with Mr. Stox Restaurant
since that time. In 1970, the 905-917 East Katella Avenue building was constructed and originally occupied
with Whirlpool Corporation. Additions to the structure were reportedly made in 1978 and 1989. The
building has been occupied with various commercial/industrial tenants since that time. In 1978, City records
indicate a residence was demolished (1021 East Katella Avenue) and two warehouse buildings (1015 and
1025 East Katella Avenue) were developed and have been occupied with various tenants since that time.
Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005 East Katella Avenue) was constructed on the subject property in the
early 1980s and has been utilized for storage since that time.
EEI contacted the Orange County Health Care Agency, California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC), State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), and reviewed other State and Federal databases to
determine if the subject property, or any adjacent properties, were listed as hazardous waste generators,
underground storage tank releases (UST), or as having other environmental concerns (i.e., spill, leak, or
aboveground tank). Neither the subject property nor any immediately adjacent property was listed on any of
the databases researched.
ii
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
iii
Four nearby sites were identified as closed LUST cases, where the soil only was impacted. The sites include:
Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south across Katella
Avenue); Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles]
south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street); Jaycox Disposal (1016 East
Katella Avenue, 100 feet south); and Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles]
south). Based on regulatory oversight, and case closed status of the releases, these sites are not considered to
be an environmental concern at this time.
On January 18, 2012, EEI personnel conducted a site reconnaissance to physically observe the site and
adjoining properties for conditions indicating a potential environmental concern. Concerns would include any
evidence of contamination, distressed vegetation, petroleum-hydrocarbon staining, waste drums, illegal
dumping, or improper waste storage and/or handling. EEI observed small quantities of paint, lubricants,
cleaning products; propane/electric batteries in the New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products suites,
and small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste in the Golden West Medical suite in building
905-917 East Katella Avenue. Small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, and used tires were observed
in the Axxis Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsky suites, and minor quantities of cleaning products,
lubricants, and or paint were noted in all of the suites in building 1015-1025 East Katella Avenue. The
quantities of these stored chemicals are considered de minimus and not an environmental concern. No other
evidence of environmental concern was noted on the subject property during our site reconnaissance
We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and
limitations of ASTM Designation E1527-05 for subject property located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025
and 1105 East Katella Avenue, City of Anaheim, California. This Phase I ESA has revealed no evidence of
recognized environmental conditions in connection with the property.
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) was to assess the possible presence of
recognized environmental conditions for the located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella
Avenue, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California (Figure 1). Recognized environmental conditions
include property uses that may indicate the presence or likely presence of an existing, historical, or threatened
release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures, soil, and/or groundwater beneath
the property. The term recognized environmental conditions is not intended to include de minimis conditions
that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment, and that would not
be subject to enforcement action by a regulatory agency.
This ESA was performed in general conformance with the American Society for Testing and Materials
(ASTM) Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment
Process, Designation E1527-05.
1.2 Scope of Services
The following scope of services was conducted by EEI:
• A review of readily available documents which included topographic, geologic, and hydrogeologic
conditions associated with the subject site.
• A review of readily available maps, aerial photographs and other documents relative to historical
subject site usage and development.
• A review of previous environmental reports and regulatory file information pertaining to both
existing and historic site conditions.
• A review of readily available federal, state, county, and city documents and database files concerning
hazardous material storage, generation and disposal, active and inactive landfills, existing
environmental concerns, and associated permits related to the subject property and/or immediately
adjacent sites.
• A site reconnaissance to ascertain current conditions on the subject property.
• Interviews with person(s) knowledgeable of the subject property.
• The preparation of this report which presents our findings, conclusions, and recommendations.
1.3 Reliance
This ESA has been prepared for the sole use of Shopoff Advisors, LP (Client). This assessment should not be
relied upon by other parties without the express written consent of EEI and the Client. Any use or reliance
upon this assessment by a party other than the Client therefore, shall be solely at the risk of such third party
and without legal recourse against EEI, its employees, officers, or directors, regardless of whether the action
in which recovery of damages is brought or based upon contract, tort, statute or otherwise.
1
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
This assessment should not be interpreted as a statistical evaluation of the subject site, but rather is intended to
provide a preliminary indication of onsite impacts from previous site usage and/or the release of hazardous
materials. If no significant indicators of the presence of hazardous materials and/or petroleum contamination
are encountered during this search, this does not preclude their presence. The findings in this report are based
upon published geologic and hydrogeologic information, and information (both documentary and oral)
provided by the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, FirstSearch® (i.e., agency database search), various
state and federal agencies, and EEI’s field observations. Some of these data are subject to change over time.
Some of these data are based on information not currently observable or measurable, but recorded by
documents or orally reported by individuals.
2.0 PHYSIOGRAPHIC SETTING
2.1 Site Description
The subject property is located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street, in the City
of Anaheim, in northern County of Orange (Figure 2). The subject property encompasses approximately 13-
acres on four parcels identified by Assessor’s Parcel Numbers (APNs): 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27,
and 082-261-28. The subject property is occupied with four commercial buildings identified as: 905 and 915
E Katella (APN 082-261-23); 917 E Katella (APN 082-261-24) part of same large building as 905/915; 1005,
1015 and 1025 E Katella (APN 082-261-27); and 1105 E Katella (APN 082-261-28) Mr. Stox Restaurant.
According to the City of Anaheim, the subject property is zoned as General Industrial and is located within
the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) land use designation.
The Westernmost property (905-917) is the location of an approximately 175,000 square-foot (sf) industrial
building occupied with multiple tenants including Golden West Medical. The adjacent parcels to the east
(1015-1025) contain two approximately 15,000 sf industrial buildings with multiple tenants including Axxis
Motorsports. To the south of these buildings, is an approximately 10,000 sf restaurant, identified as Mr.
Stox” (1105), at the southeast corner of the overall property. Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005) is
located to the west of the restaurant and is utilized for storage. A current tenant list is provided below in
Table 1.
Table 1 - Current Tenant List
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 East Katella Avenue
905 915 917
New Image Office Designs Inc.;
Evriholder Products, LLC Golden West Medical Tandem Design Inc.
1005
Thomas G. Ewing Storage; Trash Busters; Leigh Gately; Telco Electric
1015 Suites A through J
A & B) Al Amoto
Crossfit
C )Telco
Electric
D) Infinity
Rental
E) Western Dental
Services
F, G, H) Digiech Business
Solutions
J) Wholesale Auto
Detailing
1025 Suites A through J
A) RBR
Motorsports B) Hot Dog Carts C, D, E) Axxis
Motorsports
F) Wholesale
Auto
G) Auto
Repair
H)Storage
Misc.
J) Pro Cut
Concrete
2
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
The subject property is generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties to in all directions. It is
immediately bound by Omni Duct (1700 South Lewis Street) to the north, East Katella Avenue to the south, a
vacant lot and residential property to the east, and South Lewis Street to the west. A former gas station
(Former Unocal -1818 South Lewis Street) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis
Street),) is located to the southwest at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street.
Based on historical records such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, and City directories and building
records, the subject property was developed with orchards and a rural residence from at least 1938. The
property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the orchards were cleared. In 1969, the restaurant on
the southeast corner of the subject property was developed, and has been occupied with Mr. Stox Restaurant
since that time. In 1970, the 905-917 East Katella Avenue building was constructed and originally occupied
with Whirlpool Corporation. Additions to the structure were reportedly made in 1978 and 1989. The
building has been occupied with various commercial/industrial tenants since that time. In 1978, City records
indicate a residence was demolished (1021 East Katella Avenue) and two warehouse buildings (1015 and
1025 East Katella Avenue) were developed and have been occupied with various tenants since that time.
Additionally, a mini-warehouse (1005 East Katella Avenue) was constructed on the subject property in the
early 1980s and has been utilized for storage since that time.
2.2 Topography
The subject property is located on the United States Geological Survey (USGS) Anaheim, California 7.5
Minute Quadrangle map (USGS, 1981). According to this map, the elevation of the subject property is
approximately 148-feet above mean sea level (amsl). Surface drainage on the subject property drains to the
southwest towards the storm drains along East Katella Avenue.
2.3 Regional and Local Geology
The City of Anaheim lies within the central block of the Los Angeles Basin, to the south of the Coyote Hills
uplift. This portion of the central block of the Los Angeles Basin is considered part of the Central Plain. The
Central Plain is bound by the Whittier Fault to the north and northeast, by the Santa Ana Mountains and San
Joaquin Hills to the east and southeast, and by the Newport-Inglewood Fault to the south and west.
Approximately 9,700 meters of marine and non-marine Cretaceous to Pleistocene sedimentary rock fills the
Central Plain (CDMG, 2002).
According to the City of Anaheim General Plan, there are no Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones within
the City limits. The Newport-Ingelwood Fault (located approximately 7 miles southwest of the property) and
the Whittier-Elsinore Fault Zone (located approximately 7 miles northeast of the property) nearest active
faults zoned under the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. Potentially active faults within the
vicinity of the property include the Norwalk Fault (located approximately 5 miles north of the property), the
El Modeno Fault (located approximately 3 miles northeast of the property), and the Peralta Hills Fault
(located approximately 13 miles east of the property) (SCEC, 1998).
Sedimentary deposits near the site are dominated by Pleistocene to Quaternary-aged marine and non-marine
terrace deposits that range in thickness from a few meters to over 1,100 meters. Recent alluvial soils in the
Los Angeles Basin are derived primarily from older sedimentary rocks in the Santa Ana and San Gabriel
Mountains.
3
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Soil in the vicinity of the site is identified by the United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation
Service as loamy sand of the Metz Series (USDA, 1978). The Metz series consists of very deep, somewhat
excessively drained soils that formed in alluvial material from mixed, but dominantly sedimentary rocks.
Metz soils are on floodplains and alluvial fans and have slopes of 0 to 15 percent. These soils are somewhat
excessively drained; have negligible to low runoff; and moderately rapid permeability.
2.4 Regional and Local Hydrogeology
According to the California Regional Water Quality Control Board -Santa Ana Region (SARWQCB, 1995),
the site is located in the East Coastal Plain Hydrologic Subarea (HSA), of the Lower Santa Ana River
Hydrologic Unit. Groundwater in the East Coast Plain HSA has listed beneficial uses for Agricultural,
Municipal, Industrial and Industrial Process Supply purposes. The site area is located within a pressure zone
where semi-confined to confined water conditions exits. Groundwater within the aquifer of the pressure zone
in the site vicinity generally flows to the west-southwest (OCWD, 1982).
EEI reviewed the California Department of Water Resources Water Data Library (WDL, 2012) Website for
information regarding wells and depth to groundwater information. A review indicated that three public
water wells are located within a one half mile of the subject property.
The nearest well, 04S10W26C001S, located approximately 0.23 miles west, reported depth to groundwater at
140.4 feet below ground surface (bgs), measured in 1973. Well number 04S10W23R001S, located
approximately 0.34 miles northeast reported depth to groundwater at 890.8 feet bgs, measured in 1969. Well
04S10W25F001S, approximately 0.50 miles east, reported depth to groundwater at 131 feet bgs, measured in
2008.
Based on information provided on GeoTracker, the nearby Former Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100
feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street, reported depth to
groundwater at approximately 80 to 100 feet below ground surface (bgs). The groundwater flow direction of
the site was not indicated. In general, groundwater is often expected to follow the direction of surface
topography. Based on topography, regional groundwater flow direction can be expected to generally be in a
southwesterly to westerly direction (USGS, 1981).
2.5 Hydrologic Flood Plain Information
EEI reviewed the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) website (FEMA, 2012) to determine if
the subject property lies within a Flood Hazard Zone as designated by FEMA. According to the Federal
Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) Map Number 06059C0142J, Panel Number 142 of 539, reviewed, the subject
property is not situated within a flood zone.
3.0 SITE BACKGROUND
3.1 Site Ownership
Information regarding site ownership was provided by Preliminary Title Reports for each of the subject
parcels prepared by Fidelity National Title Company (Appendix B). The current owner of subject parcels
APNs 082-261-23 and -24 (905-917 East Katella Avenue) is listed as K/L Anaheim Properties I and II, LLC.
The current owner of subject parcel ASPNs 082-261-27 (1005, 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue) is listed
as See Development. The current owner of subject parcel APNs 082-261-28 (1105 East Katella Avenue) is
listed Ronald and Deborah Marshall.
4
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
3.2 Site History
EEI reviewed readily available information sources to evaluate historic land use in and around the subject site.
These information sources include aerial photographs, USGS maps, City/County Directory search, City of
Anaheim building records. The information sources are reviewed in the following sections.
3.2.1 Aerial Photograph and Historical Map Review
Aerial photographs and historical topographical maps were reviewed to identify historical land
development and any surface conditions which may have impacted the subject property. Photographs
and historical topographic maps dating 1898, 1906, 1935, 1938, 1942, 1947, 1950, 1953, 1965, 1968,
1972, 1977, 1981, 1983, 1995, 2002 and 2010 were obtained and reviewed from Track Info
Services/FirstSearch®, an environmental information/database retrieval service. A 2011 aerial
photograph was obtained and reviewed from GoogleEarth, a copy of which is included herein
(Figure 2).
Table 1 summarizes the results of the historical use review. Copies of the aerial photographs and
historical topographic maps provided by Track Info Services/FirstSearch® are included in
Appendix C. Based on the data reviewed the subject property was developed with orchards and a
rural residence from at least 1938. The property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the
orchards were cleared, but remained with a residence and utilized for agriculture. In 1977, the
subject property appeared developed with two commercial structures (905-917 and 1105). Two
additional structures (1015 and 1025) appeared on the subject property in 1983. These four
structures have remained on the subject property until the present time.
TABLE 2 - Summary of Historical Use Review
Year Source and
Scale Comments
1898 and
1906
Topographic Map
1:62,500
No structural development was present on the subject or adjacent property. I-5
was present as well as several rail lines traversing the site vicinity. Sparse small
structures and streets were noted in the surrounding area labeled as “Miraflores.”
1935 Topographic Map
1:31,680
Structural development was present adjacent and east of the subject property.
Katella Avenue, Lewis Street, and State College Boulevard were present in the
site vicinity. Surrounding area appeared with urban development.
1938 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
Subject property, adjacent property and surrounding area appeared with orchards.
A rural residence appeared on the central portion of the subject property and
adjacent to the east. Other residential development appeared in the surrounding
area as well as some commercial development to the south.
1942 Topographic Map
1:62,500
Structures remained in the immediate site vicinity. The subject property and
surrounding area appeared shaded green indicating orchards were present.
Surrounding area appeared with increased development.
1947 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
No apparent changes were noted on the subject property, adjacent property or in
the surrounding area since the 1938 photograph.
1950 Topographic Map
1:24,000
Site vicinity no longer shaded green for orchards. No other changes were noted
on the subject property, adjacent property or in the surrounding area.
1953 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
Additional farming structures appeared on (or near) the subject property and to
the east. Additional farm structures were noted in the surrounding area.
1965 Topographic Map
1:24,000
Fewer structures were noted near the subject property. Increased development
was noted in the surrounding area which also appeared with orchards.
5
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
TABLE 2 - Summary of Historical Use Review
Year Source and
Scale Comments
1968 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
Orchards were no longer present on the subject and adjacent properties; however,
the property still appeared utilized for agriculture. Residences remained on the
subject property and adjacent to the east. Katella Avenue appeared improved and
widened. I-5 was present to the west. Commercial development was present on
the south side of Katella Avenue as well as to the west along a rail line and I-5.
1972 Topographic Map
1:24,000
No apparent changes were noted to the subject parcel or adjacent and surrounding
property since the 1965 topographic map.
1977 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
Subject property appeared with a large structure on the western portion (905-917)
and a smaller commercial structure (1105) was present on the southeastern
portion of the subject property. The central and northeast portions of the subject
property appeared cleared and undeveloped. Adjacent property in all directions
appeared with a mix of commercial development and agriculture.
1981 Topographic Map
1:24,000
A large building was on the western portion and a smaller building was on the
eastern portion of the subject property. Additional commercial development
appeared on the adjacent property in all directions. Surrounding property
appeared entirely urbanely developed.
1983 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
Two rectangular buildings (1015-1025) now appeared on the northeast portion of
the subject property. The central portion of the subject property was now
developed with a parking area and a smaller, narrow, rectangular warehouse
building (1005). Commercial development appeared in the site vicinity.
1995 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
No apparent changes were noted to the subject parcel or adjacent and surrounding
property since the 1983 photograph.
2002 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
No apparent changes were noted to the subject parcel or adjacent and surrounding
property since the 1995 photograph.
2010 Aerial Photograph
1:375 feet
No apparent changes were noted to the subject property since the 2002
photograph. The adjacent property to the northeast appeared cleared of its
previous structures and vacant. A large area to the southeast of Katella Avenue
also appeared cleared and vacant.
2011 Aerial Photograph
GoogleEarth
The subject property appeared in its current configuration, with a large
commercial structure located on the western portion, two rectangular buildings on
the northeastern portion and a smaller restaurant building located on the southeast
corner. A residential structure appeared adjacent and to the northeast on the
formerly vacant property. Surrounding area appeared commercially developed.
3.2.2 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps
Sanborn Fire Insurance maps were developed in the late 1800s and early 1900s for use as an
assessment tool for fire insurance rates in urbanized areas. A search was made at the Los Angeles
Public Library’s collection of Sanborn Fire Insurance maps. Sanborn map coverage was not
available for the subject property indicating little or no development in the site vicinity prior to 1950.
In addition, EEI requested a Sanborn map search from Track Info Services/FirstSearch®, an
environmental information/database retrieval service. According to Track Info Services, there is no
Sanborn map coverage for the area of the subject property (Appendix D, page 115).
6
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
3.2.3 City/County Directories
Directory listings associated with the subject property addresses was obtained from Track Info
Services/FirstSearch®, an environmental information/database retrieval service. The earliest listing
for any of the subject property addresses was for 1105 East Katella Avenue, which was listed with
Mr. Stox Restaurant from 1969 and through 2009. Subject addresses 1015 and 1025 East Katella
Avenue were listed from 1980 through 2009 with various commercial businesses. 1005 East Katella
Avenue was not listed in the directories. Subject address 905 East Katella Avenue was listed from
2002 to 2009 with various commercial businesses. Subject addresses 915 and 917 East Katella
Avenue were listed from 1992 through 2009 with various commercial businesses. A summary of the
listings associated with the subject property address is summarized below in Table 2. A copy of the
City Directory Report is provided in Appendix C.
One onsite address and one nearby address were listed by Track Info Services with occupants of
potential environmental concern. The onsite address, 1015 East Katella Avenue, was occupied with
Community Tire of Anaheim in 1992; based on the absence of any permits associated with this
address listed on any of the other databases researched, this listing does not appear to be a concern.
The nearby site of potential concern was 902 East Katella Avenue (approximately 100 feet to the
south), was listed as the site of the Anaheim Unocal 76 in 1992 and 1997. This service station is no
longer present, and has not reported a release under the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST)
database; therefore, is not considered an environmental concern.
TABLE 3 - Summary of City Directory Search
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025, 1105 East Katella Avenue
2009
902- No listing
905- New Image Office Design
915- JC Corporate Training; LCA; Profsnl Lighthouse
917- No listing
1015- Auto Brite; Kaladar Co.; Telco Electric
1025- Axis Motor Sport; Reeds Irrigation
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1110- Ideal Lease
2002
902- No listing
905- Clear Connection; C. Travis; WC Designs
915- Goldenwest Medical; JC Corporate Training; LCA; PIL
917- M. Brandler
1015- BE Design; Guy Balancing; K Knotts; LJD Ent;
Specialty Mach and Fabrication
1025- Amer. Marble and Tile; Greenscape Sys; Imperial
Refrig; Jet Medical; Quetzal Cabinets; Reeds Irrigation
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1110- Ideal Lease
1997
914- No listing
905- Addresses not listed
915- B&F Pharm; B. Capeloto; Gateway Medical; Goldenwest
Medical; G. Jystad
917- No listing
1015- BE Design; K Knotts; Plexi Fab; World Electric
1025- Ellenas Bread; Greenscape Sys; Imperial Refrig; Reeds
Irrigation
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1110- Ideal Lease
7
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
TABLE 3 - Summary of City Directory Search
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025, 1105 East Katella Avenue
1992
818- No listing
905- Addresses not listed
915- Salem Carpets
917- Whirlpool Fncl
1015- Benchmark Air Sys; Community Tire; Diamond
Plastering; Nutritional Spclty; Road Runner Cmpter
1025- Artisan Draperies; Ellenas Bread; Greenscape Sys; Natl
Irrigation; T&M Construction; Zulu Airware
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1110- Rafferty
International Trucks,
Inc.
1987
818- United Couriers Inc.
905, 915, 917- Addresses not listed
1015- Servicemaster; D-Real Stone Corp; E-AVC Iron Work;
G-MR Ent. G-AGC Electronics; J-ZZZZ Best Carpet and
Furniture Cleaning
1025- C-Global Roofing; D-Lounge Car Tours; F-National
Irrigation; G-Pearcys Woodworking; G-Joseph Fusco and
Assoc; J-Telcom Contractors
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1110- Rafferty
International Trucks,
Inc.
1983
818- United Couriers Inc.
905, 915, 917- Addresses not listed
1015- PAK edm; Smart Closets; Golden Bear Redwood; SFE
Machine; The Head Shop; B- Huston Dental Service; C Lundy
Medical Products; D Discount Sales; H Simeone Assoc.
1025- Ed’s Ornamental Iron; MTS Construction;’ Basala Fire
Fighter; Koenes Electric; Tech Enterprises; National Irrigation
Specialists; BNB Ornamental Iron
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1110- Rafferty
International Trucks,
Inc.
1980
818- United Couriers Inc.
905, 915, 917- Addresses not listed
1015-ABC Four Seasons Inc.; B- Huston Dental Service; C
Lundy Medical Products; D Bement Discount Sales; E
Simeone Assoc.
1025- Contor Tool Corp.; Rylaur Custom Cabinetry; Ed’s
Ornamental Iron; Koenes Electric; Cupcake Floor Covering;
A-1 Certification Scv; NICS; BNB Ornamental Iron
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1230- Diagraph of
California
1969 and 1974
700- Westside Bldg. Mat.
818- United Couriers Inc.
905, 915, 917, 1015, 1025- Addresses not listed
1105 – Mr. Stox Restaurant
1110- International
Harvester Company
End Of Search due to: A) earlier directory or street listing not found; B) listing out of range, listings re-numbered, or no
numeric listings
3.2.4 City of Anaheim Building Department Files
EEI researched the City of Anaheim Building Department’s website Property Permit Records
database (City of Anaheim, 2012) regarding any building permits or other records associated with the
subject property. The following is a summary of the permits on file with the building department for
the subject property address run 905 through 1105 East Katella Avenue:
8
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
917 East Katella Avenue:
September 24, 1975: Permit for a new building issued to Sequoia Pacific.
April 5, 1978: Permit for addition to existing building issued to Whirlpool Corporation.
A986- Letter from the City of Anaheim stating that the building was constructed in two phases, first
in 1970 and again in 1978.
June 30, 1989: Permit for addition to building issued to Whirlpool Corporation.
June 12, 1990: Certificate of Occupancy issued to Salem Carpets (also listed as 919 East Katella
Avenue).
1005 through 1015 East Katella Avenue:
April 28, 1987: Building permits for a mini-warehouse of 3,696 square feet (1005) issued to Hunco
Development Company.
1021 and 1025 East Katella Avenue:
June 8, 1978: Demolition permit for a house and garage issued to Hunco Development Company
(1021).
March 31, 1978: Permit for a multi-tenant industrial building issued to Hunco Development
Company (1025).
July 18, 1990: Tenant improvement for a bakery issued to Figueroa and Associates. (1025).
1105 East Katella Avenue:
December 2, 1966: Restaurant Plan Check issued to Philip McFarland.
March 22, 1968: Permit for a restaurant issued to Katella Corporation.
March 16, 1971: Permit to enlarge an existing restaurant issued to Harry Fahnstalk.
3.3 Regulatory Database Search
EEI reviewed known electronic database listings for possible hazardous waste generating establishments in
the vicinity of the subject property, as well as adjacent sites with known environmental concerns. Facilities
were identified by county, state, or federal agencies that generate, store, or dispose of hazardous materials.
The majority of information in this section was obtained from FirstSearch®, an environmental
information/database retrieval service. A copy of the FirstSearch® report is provided in Appendix D, along
with a description of the individual databases. The subject property was not listed on any of the databases
reviewed as having environmental concerns. For discussion purposes, the term “non-geocoded” is applied to
sites that either have non-existent or incomplete addresses. EEI has located these sites, based on the location
description provided in the records search. Following is a list of databases that were reviewed in the
preparation of this report.
3.3.1 Federal Databases
National Priority List (NPL) – No listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject
property.
NPL Delisted – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property.
9
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCLIS) – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property.
Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System
(CERCLIS) (NFRAP) Archive – One listing was reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject
property. Orange Empire (1000 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), was listed with a
status of “No Further Action Planned (NFRAP)” as of 1988. Based on this information, this site is
not considered and environmental concern.
RCRA Corrective Action Sites (COR) – No listings were reported within a one mile radius of the
subject property.
RCRA TSD Facility List (RCRA-D) – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the
subject property.
RCRA Generators (RCRA-G) – Twenty-one listings were reported within a one mile radius of the
subject property.
Generator permits are not generally rationale for environmental concern, unless a facility has a dual
listing, such as a reported release. The following RCRA-G listings: Jaycox Disposal (1016 East
Katella Avenue, 100 feet south); Westside Materials aka L.A. Truck Centers (700 East Katella
Street, 500 feet southwest); and Ryder Student Bus Service (917 Gene Autry Way, 0.13 miles
south), have reported releases and are discussed below under Section 3.3.2 the Leaking
Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. The remaining listings have not documented a
release; therefore, these sites are not considered an environmental concern.
RCRA No Longer Regulated (NLR) – One listing was reported within a one-eighth mile radius of the
subject property. Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles]
south), was listed with a status of “No Longer Regulated (NLR)” as of 1996. Based on this
information, this site is not considered and environmental concern.
Federal Brownfield – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject
property.
Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) – Three listings were reported within a one-eighth
mile radius of the subject property. All three listings were for Unocal (former) (1818 South Lewis
Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis
Street. In general, ERNS listings denote single release events to the surface; however, the
aforementioned site has also documented a release to groundwater and is discussed below under
Section 3.3.2 the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database.
The subject property was not identified on any of the above-referenced databases researched.
3.3.2 State and Regional Sources
Tribal Lands – No listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject property. One non-
geocoded listing was reported: Bureau of Indian Affairs Contact 1 (location unknown). Tribal
lands listings are generally not locations or releases, but placeholders used to contact the local Bureau
of Indian Affairs representative for information on tribal lands in the area.
10
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
State/Tribal Sites – Seven listings were reported within a one mile radius of the subject property.
Two sites were located within a one-quarter mile of the subject property both located 100 feet (0.02
miles) to the south along the north side of East Katella Avenue. : Orange Empire (1000 East Katella
Avenue) was assessed as the site of potential contamination by the DTSC in 1988. The DTSC
determined that “No Further Action (NFA)” was required for the site. Platinum Triangle (1016 East
Katella Avenue) was identified as an agricultural property with orchards, ASTs and USTs. The status
of the listing is “inactive-needs action.” Based on the regulatory oversight of the listings; these sites
are not considered an environmental concern.
Based on the regulatory oversight by Orange County/and or closed status, and distance from the
subject property (i.e., greater than one-quarter mile), the following sites are not considered an
environmental concern at this time: Silgan Plastics Corporation (611 East Cerritos Avenue, 0.41
miles northwest); Itasco (2211 East Howell Avenue, 100 feet 0.51 miles northeast); Ponderosa
Elementary School (Mountain View and Wilken Way, 0.60 miles southwest); Neville Chemical
(2201 East Cerritos Avenue, 0.60 miles northeast); and The City Place North (3745 West Chapman
Avenue, 0.95 miles south).
State Spills 90 – No listings were reported within a one-eighth mile radius of the subject property.
State/Tribal Solid Waste Landfill (SWL) Sites – No listings were reported within a one-half mile
radius of the subject property. One non-geocoded listing was reported. Upon further review, EEI
determined this site to be located greater than one-half mile from the subject property. Therefore,
this site is not considered an environmental concern at this time.
State/Tribal California State Leaking Underground Storage Tanks (LUST) – Twenty (20) listings,
two with duplicate listings, were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject property. Of
listings, six sites were located within approximately one-eighth mile of the subject property and are
summarized below. EEI reviewed the on-line database GeoTracker, which provides records on
LUSTs, maintained by the SWRCB, for more information regarding these cases. The remaining
listings were determined to be located greater than one-quarter mile from the subject property and/or
have cases which were closed by regulatory agencies; therefore, these sites are not considered a
concern.
Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) across
Katella Avenue); reported a diesel fuel and chlorinated solvent release in August 1996, which
reportedly impacted the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in August 2007.
According to the case closure summary accessed on GeoTracker, site closure was recommended for
various reasons including: contamination being removed (i.e., excavated and taken off-site for
treatment); much of the contamination remaining at the site was localized, minor and shallow; the
worst contamination is located below the buildings and structural supports; there is no apparent risk
to groundwater, the environment, or public health; the contaminants remaining in soil are in the
garage section of the facility and will not likely require a health risk assessment unless the land use
changes. According to the report, depth to groundwater was estimated to be approximately 80 feet
bgs and the remaining contaminants were not detected below 10 feet. Based on the case closed status
and soil only nature of the release case, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern.
11
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south)
at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street, reported three gasoline releases,
all listed as closed cases, each impacting soil only. A gasoline release was reported in September
1990, which reportedly impacted the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in
October 1995. A second release (diesel fuel) was reported in April 2001, which reportedly impacted
the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in January 2002. A third release
(gasoline) related to the Steve Craig Property was reported at the site in 2004. The release reportedly
impacted soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in March 2011. According to the
case closure summaries, the cases were closed for various reasons including the following: the source
of contamination has been removed; there does not appear to be a threat to public health and a health
risk assessment is not required since the site does not involve a change in land use and is currently in
operation as a service station; and the SARWQCB concurs with the site closure. The summary stated
that there is no apparent threat to groundwater, which occurs in the area at approximately 80 to 100
feet bgs and not contaminants were detected near that depth. Based on the case closed status of these
release cases, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern at this time.
Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), reported a waste oil and
chlorinated solvent release in October 1988, and the case was closed by the OCHCA in February
1990. Based on regulatory oversight, and case closed status of the release, this site is not considered
to be an environmental concern at this time.
Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the northeast
corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street), reported a gasoline release in August 1987,
which reportedly impacted the soil only. The case was closed by the City of Anaheim in August
1998. According to the case closure summary, groundwater contamination does not appear to be an
issue, as all samples were non-detect. Eighteen boring confirmed that soil contamination does not
extend below 55 feet, while groundwater is found at approximately 80 feet. Based on the regulatory
oversight, and case closed status of the release, this site is not considered an environmental concern at
this time.
Westside Materials aka L.A. Truck Centers (700 East Katella Street, 500 feet southwest), reported
a diesel fuel release, which reportedly impacted soil only in October 1987. Remediation was
conducted and the case was closed by the City of Anaheim in February 1991. Based on the distance
from the subject property and case closed status, this site is not considered to be an environmental
concern at this time.
Ryder Student Bus Service (917 Gene Autry Way, 0.13 miles south), reported a gasoline fuel
release, which reportedly impacted soil only in January 1993. Remediation was conducted and the
case was closed by the City of Anaheim in October 1996. Based on the distance from the subject
property and case closed status, this site is not considered to be an environmental concern at this time.
State/Tribal Permitted Underground Storage Tanks (UST)/Aboveground Storage Tanks (AST) –
Eight (8) listings (some duplicated) were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject
property.
Operational permits are not generally rationale for environmental concern, unless a facility has a dual
listing, such as a reported release. Westrux International Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100
feet [0.02 miles] south); and Former Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street,
100 feet [0.02 miles] south), have both documented releases and are listed under the Leaking
Underground Storage Tank (LUST) database. See the LUST section above for further information.
12
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
State/Tribal IC/EC – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject
property.
State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties (VCP) – No listings were reported within a one-
quarter mile radius of the subject property.
State/Tribal Brownfields – No listings were reported within a one-half mile radius of the subject
property.
State Permits – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property.
State Other – One listing was reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property. State
Orange Empire (1000 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), was listed with a status of
“No Further Action Planned (NFRAP)” as of 1988. Based on this information, this site is not
considered and environmental concern.
Federal IC/EC – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property.
Dry Cleaners – No listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject property.
Hazardous Waste Manifest – Six listings were reported within a one-quarter mile radius of the subject
property. Manifest permits are not generally rationale for environmental concern, unless a facility
has a dual listing, such as a reported release. Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet
south), and Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south), have
both documented releases and are listed under the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST)
database. See the LUST section above for further information.
The subject property was not identified on any of the above-referenced databases researched.
3.4 Regulatory Agency Review
3.4.1 City of Anaheim Fire Department
EEI contacted the City of Anaheim Fire Department, Fire Prevention Services (AFD), for information
pertaining to the subject property. A written request was submitted requesting information on
hazardous materials inventories, inspection reports, hazardous waste generating permits, spills,
underground and/or above ground storage tanks, CUPA consolidated permits, Investigation
Reports/complaints, and/or site remediation plans for the addresses associated with the subject
property (905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue). According to a response
letter from Patti Rosal-Cary, dated January 17, 2012, no records associated with the subject property
were found. Ms. Rosal-Cary noted that information related to underground storage tanks prior to
1991 and Hazardous Waste and on-site treatment records prior to 2001 may be on record with the
County of Orange Health Care Agency (see contact below).
3.4.2 City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department
EEI contacted the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department for information regarding the
presence of any UST permits or records or other tank information associated with the subject
property. According to a response on January 23, 2012, from Ms. Jennifer Hall, Records and
Information Manager with the department, there are no UST Case Files on record for the subject
property address.
13
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
3.4.3 Orange County Health Care Agency – Environmental Health Division
EEI reviewed current Orange County Health Care Agency – Environmental Health Division
(OCHCA) databases to determine if the subject property or any adjacent or nearby property, within a
one-quarter mile radius of the subject property was listed as having a potential environmental
concern. The following information was reviewed:
Hazardous Waste Facilities
No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property.
Industrial Cleanup Program
No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property.
Local Oversight Program (LOP)
No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property.
Non-Petroleum Underground Storage Tanks
No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property.
Underground Tank Facilities (UTF)
No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property.
Land Fill Sites
No listings were reported for the subject property, or any adjacent property.
3.4.4 Department of Toxic Substances Control
EEI reviewed the online database EnviroStor (2012), which provides records on LUSTs, SLICs,
Priority cleanup sites and states sites, which is maintained by the Department of Toxic Substances
Control (DTSC). No listings were identified on the EnviroStor database for the subject property or
any adjacent or nearby property.
3.4.5 State Water Resources Control Board
EEI reviewed the online database GeoTracker, maintained by the State Water Resources Control
Board (SWRCB, 2012), to determine whether the subject property (or any nearby property) was
listed as having a leaking underground storage tank (LUST), spill and leak or above-ground tank
problem (AST). No listings were identified on the GeoTracker database for the subject property or
any adjacent property.
Four nearby sites were identified as closed LUST cases. The sites include: Westrux International
Trucks (1110 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south across Katella Avenue); Former
Tosco 76 Station #8800 aka Unocal (1818 South Lewis Street, 100 feet [0.02 miles] south) at the
northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and S. Lewis Street); Jaycox Disposal (1016 East Katella
Avenue, 100 feet south); and Texaco Service Station (818 East Katella Avenue, 100 feet [0.02
miles] south). Based on regulatory oversight, and case closed status of the release, this site is not
considered to be an environmental concern at this time.
14
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
3.4.6 Review of Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources Files
Oil and gas wells were not observed on the subject property during our subject property
reconnaissance. A review of the California Division of Oil, Gas, and Geothermal Resources Website
for oil and gas fields in California and Alaska (CDOGGR, 2012) indicated no petroleum exploration
or production has occurred on the subject property (identified as within Township 04 South, Range
10 West, Section 23).
3.4.7 National Pipeline Mapping System
In addition, EEI reviewed the National Pipeline Mapping System (NPMS, 2012) public viewer
website for gas transmission pipelines and hazardous liquid trunk lines on or close to the subject
property. According to the information reviewed, no pipelines are located on or in close proximity to
the subject property.
3.5 Interview with Current Property Owner
EEI contacted Mr. Jonathan M. Brandler, broker and representative of the property owner (Seller) for 905-917
East Katella Avenue, Mr. Travis Rosenbaum, Property Manager for owner Mr. Tom Ewing with See
Development for 1005-1025 East Katella Avenue, and Mr. Ron Marshall, owner of 1105 East Katella
Avenue, for information regarding the subject property.
Mr. Brandler stated that the Seller of 905-917 East Katella Avenue has provided Shopoff Advisors, LP, copies
of all environmental investigative reports within the definition of “Due Diligence Documents” set forth in the
Purchase Agreement. These reports were in turn provided to EEI by Shopoff Advisors, LP for review. Mr.
Rosenbaum also provided EEI with two previous Phase I ESAs conducted for 1005-1025 East Katella
Avenue. All of the previous reports provided were reviewed by EEI and documented below in Section 3.7
Previous Assessments. Additional information provided by Mr. Brandler, Mr. Rosenbaum, and Mr. Marshall
is documented below.
3.5.1 Past or Present Uses Indicating Environmental Concern
Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents,
the Seller is not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject property.
Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he is not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject
property.
Mr. Marshall stated that he is not aware of any environmental concerns associated with the subject
property.
3.5.2 Deed Restrictions, Activity or Land Use Restrictions or Environmental Liens
Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents,
the Seller is not aware of any deed restrictions, activity or land use restrictions, environmental liens,
or notification of violations relating to past or recurrent violations of environmental laws with respect
to the property or any facility located on the property.
15
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any deed restrictions, activity or land use restrictions,
environmental liens, or notification of violations relating to past or recurrent violations of
environmental laws with respect to the property or any facility located on the property.
Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any deed restrictions, activity or land use restrictions,
environmental liens, or notification of violations relating to past or recurrent violations of
environmental laws with respect to the property or any facility located on the property.
3.5.3 Presence of Hazardous Substances or Environmental Violations
Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents,
the Seller is not aware of any unresolved or current notices of violation pertaining to the use or
storage of hazardous substances or petroleum with respect to the property or any facility located on
the property.
Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any unresolved or current notices of violation
pertaining to the use or storage of hazardous substances or petroleum with respect to the property or
any facility located on the property.
Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any unresolved or current notices of violation pertaining
to the use or storage of hazardous substances or petroleum with respect to the property or any facility
located on the property.
3.5.4 Environmental Investigations or Cleanups
Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents,
the Seller is not aware of any environmental investigations or cleanups conducted for the subject
property.
Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any environmental investigations or cleanups
conducted for the subject property.
Mr. Marshal stated that he was not aware of any environmental investigations or cleanups conducted
for the subject property.
3.5.5 Legal Proceedings
Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents,
the Seller is not aware of any of any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or administrative
proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or petroleum
products involving the property by any owner or occupant on the property.
Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any of any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or
administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or
petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant on the property.
Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any of any past, threatened, or pending lawsuits or
administrative proceedings concerning a release or threatened release of any hazardous substance or
petroleum products involving the property by any owner or occupant on the property.
16
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
3.5.6 Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based Paint
Mr. Brandler stated that except as may be set forth in the Environmental Due Diligence Documents,
the Seller is not aware of any Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based Paint at the subject
property.
Mr. Rosenbaum stated that he was not aware of any Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-
Based Paint at the subject property.
Mr. Marshall stated that he was not aware of any Asbestos-Containing Materials and/or Lead-Based
Paint at the subject property.
3.6 User Provided Information
Pursuant to ASTM E1527-05, EEI provided a Phase I ESA User Specific Questionnaire to the “user” (the
person on whose behalf the Phase I ESA is being conducted), Mr. Brian Rupp, with Shopoff Advisors, LP.
The User Specific Information provided by Mr. Rupp is documented below. A list of the user specific
questions (per ASTM E1527-05) with Mr. Rupp’s associated responses is included in Appendix E. Mr.
Rupp provided EEI with Preliminary Title Reports (PTRs) for each of the subject property parcels (included
in Appendix B).
3.6.1 Environmental Liens or Activity and Land Use Limitations
Mr. Rupp stated that he is not aware of environmental liens or activity and land use limitations on the
subject property. A review of the PTRs associated with each of the subject property parcels
confirmed the absence of any environmental liens or land use limitations on the subject property.
3.6.2 Specialized Knowledge
Mr. Rupp stated that he has no specialized knowledge or experience related to the property or nearby
properties (i.e., knowledge of the chemicals or processes used by a type of business). Mr. Rupp noted
that the past uses of the subject property were as a warehouse and a restaurant.
3.6.3 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues
Mr. Rupp stated that the purchase price reasonably reflects the fair market value of the subject
property.
3.6.4 Presence or Likely Presence of Contamination
Mr. Rupp indicated that he is not aware of any specific issues related to spills, releases, or cleanups
which may have occurred on the property.
17
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
3.6.5 Other
Mr. Rupp noted that the Phase I ESA is a required as a due diligence requirement prior to the
acquisition of the subject property.
3.7 Previous Assessments
Based on the information provided by the property owner, previous site investigation activities have been
conducted on the subject property. The client provided EEI with copies of these reports. The following
section summarizes the information EEI reviewed.
Environmental Management Group, Inc. (EMG), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated June
2, 1994, Stadium Business Park, 1005-1025 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on
behalf of lender Provident Companies
The Phase I ESA conducted by EMG included the following: Regulatory Database Review, Historical Data
Review, Chemical/Hazardous Materials, PCB's, ACM, Operational Activities, AST's, UST's, Surface Areas,
and Adjacent Properties. The Phase I ESA determined that the property did not contain facility storage tanks,
drums, containers or pipelines (either above or below ground), nor transformers or other equipment
containing PCB's in excess of 50 parts per million (ppm). Furthermore, the Phase I ESA concluded that the
property did not appear on any of the regulatory databases reviewed, nor was there any historical evidence
that the property was ever involved in the generation of hazardous chemicals, or the treatment, storage or
disposal of hazardous waste. Based on the information obtained during the course of their Phase I ESA, EMG
concluded that the property represented a "low-risk scenario", and that no recognized environmental
conditions were identified. EMG had no recommendation for further investigation.
Eckland consultants, Inc. (ECI), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated September 11, 1995,
Stadium Business Park, 1005-1025 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of
lender Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada (U.S)
ECI conducted a Phase I ESA Update for the subject property, which included a regulatory and document
review, site observations, interviews, and a review of the previous Phase I ESA conducted in 1994. ECI
concluded that the property was essentially in the same condition as encountered in the previous Phase I ESA.
ECI found no specific issues of concern related to chemical or hazardous waste storage, tenant activities,
waste disposal practices, AST's, UST's, PCB's, asbestos, lead-based paint, surface conditions, or a regulatory
database review. Based on the results of their Phase I ESA Update, ECI concluded that no evidence of
recognized environmental conditions was identified at the property. No further investigation was
recommended.
Smith Emery GeoServices. (SEG), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated October 31, 1996,
915-917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of Hill, Farrer and Burrill LLP.
The Phase I ESA conducted by SEG included the following: site reconnaissance, drive-by survey, regulatory
database review, historical data review, and a summary of geology and hydrology. The property was
occupied with a one-story warehouse building of approximately 130,240 square feet in size and associated
parking areas. (176,400 total property size). At the time of the report, the warehouse was occupied with five
tenants: Whirl Pool, Golden West Medical Center, Orange County Register, WC Designs, and CTS storage
and warehousing. The property did not appear on any of the regulatory databases reviewed, nor was there any
historical evidence that the property was ever involved in the generation of hazardous chemicals, or the
treatment, storage or disposal of hazardous waste. SEG concluded that the following items of concern were
found during the site
18
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
reconnaissance: 1) a metal dumpster containing oil compressor was noted along the western bound of the
property. The oils from the metal container were observed leaking and heavy staining was noted on the
concrete surface terminating at a crack in the concrete; and a shed with a 55-gallong drum labeled as
containing waste oil and several copper pipes was noted along the western property boundary. Oil was noted
in the asphalt pavement directly underneath the shed. Greenish liquid staining was observed between the shed
and cracks in the concrete surface.
In conclusion, SEG recommended that a Phase II Environmental Site Assessment involving subsurface soil
sampling be performed in the aforementioned stained areas to determine if the subsurface soils have been
impacted with contaminants. The consultant noted that the onsite building was constructed prior to 1978;
therefore, there is potential for the presence of asbestos containing materials and that if the structure was to be
demolished or remodeled, a demolition level ACM survey be conducted.
Smith Emery GeoServices. (SEG), Report of Environmental Sampling, dated December 4, 1996, 915-
917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of Hill, Farrer and Burrill LLP.
The above-referenced report performed environmental sampling within two stained areas outside the
commercial structure at 915-917 East Katella Avenue, which were identified in the previous Phase I ESA.
The purpose of the investigation was to determine if subsurface soils had been impacted due to past site
usage. Two borings were hand augered, one in each area of staining, to a depth of five feet bgs. The two
areas of staining were located on the west side of the structure and were associated with a metal dumpster and
a shed. Soil samples were analyzed for total recoverable petroleum hydrocarbons (TRPH) by EPA Method
418.1, for volatile organics by EPA Method 8240, and for total copper. The results of the analyses performed
showed that all constituents analyzed for were below current regulatory actionable limits. SEG stated that it
had been their experience that TRPH levels of less than 100 parts per million (ppm) do not require
remediation unless so indicated by regulatory agencies. Based on the results of the sampling and chemical
analysis, it was SEG’s opinion that no further action was warranted relating to subsurface soils at the site.
Centec Engineering (CE), Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, dated September 24, 2010, 905, 915,
and 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California Prepared on behalf of 1st Enterprise Bank.
The Phase I ESA conducted by CE included the following: site reconnaissance, drive-by survey, regulatory
database review, historical data review, interviews and a summary of geology and hydrology. The property
consisted of two contiguous rectangular-shaped parcels totaling approximately 8.7 acres developed with a
concrete tilt-up light industrial building of approximately 152,280 sf with associated parking and drive areas.
At the time of the report, the warehouse was occupied with three tenants: New Image Office Design (905);
Joshua Casey Corporate Training and Education (915), and Golden West Medical Center (917).
According to the report, the building was constructed in 1973, and Whirlpool Corporation was the original
occupant. Whirlpool subdivided the building to accommodate a carpet business called Salem Carpets in
approximately 1989. The medical center moved to the property in 1993. In 1993, a business called Excelsior
apparently took over a substantial portion of the building from Whirlpool. New Image Office Design has
been onsite since at least 2006 and possibly longer. No records reviewed indicated USTs had been in use at
the property, or that significant spills or other environmental issues of concern are present.
Phase I ESA determined that the property did not appear on any of the regulatory databases reviewed, nor was
there any historical evidence of incidents involving hazardous materials, the presence of PCB containing
transformers, or current or former USTs or ASTs. The age of the building suggested potential for the
presence of asbestos containing materials on the property, but no damaged suspect friable materials were
noted onsite.
19
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
The report stated that hazardous materials were limited to small amounts of cleaners and bio-hazardous wastes
generated by the medical clinic. Several adjacent properties across Katella Avenue, and within a mile radius,
were listed as known sources of contamination; however, substantial remediation work had taken place at
these locations and did not present an imminent risk to the subject property
In conclusion, CE stated that the assessment revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions
(RECs) associated with the current or past use of the property. Based on the lack of any known
environmental issues or regulatory concerns for the subject property, no further actions were recommended by
the consultant.
3.8 Other Environmental Issues
3.8.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials
Asbestos, a natural fiber used in the manufacturing of a number of different building materials, has
been identified as a human carcinogen. Most friable (i.e., easily broken or crushed) Asbestos-
Containing Materials (ACM) were banned in building materials by 1978. By 1989, most major
manufacturers had voluntarily removed non-friable ACM (i.e., flooring, roofing, and
mastics/sealants) from the market. These materials, however, were not banned completely.
In October 1995, the Federal Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) redefined the
manner by which building materials are classified in regards to asbestos and the also the way these
materials are to be handled. Under this ruling, “thermal system insulation and sprayed-on or troweled
on or otherwise applied surfacing materials” applied before 1980 are considered Presumed Asbestos-
Containing Materials (PACM). Other building materials such as “floor or ceiling tiles, siding,
roofing, transite panels” (i.e., non-friable) are also considered PACM unless tested.
According to the information reviewed, structures on the subject property were built prior to 1978.
Therefore, the presence of asbestos-containing materials is likely. EEI recommends ACM testing of
building materials prior to improvements or demolition activities.
3.8.2 Lead-Based Paint
Lead-Based Paint (LBP) is identified by OSHA, the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and the
Department Housing and Urban Development Department (HUD) as being a potential health risk to
humans, particularly children, based upon its effects to the central nervous system, kidneys, and
bloodstream. The risk of Lead-Based Paint has been classified by HUD based upon the age and
condition of the painted surface. This classification includes the following:
maximum risk is from paint applied before 1950
a severe risk is present from paint applied before 1960
a moderate risk is present from paint applied before 1970
a slight risk is present from paint applied before 1977
paint applied after 1977 is not expected to contain lead
According to the information reviewed, structures on the subject property were built prior to 1978.
Therefore, the presence of lead based paint is likely. EEI recommends lead-based paint testing of
building materials prior to improvements or demolition activities.
20
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
3.8.3 Radon
Radon is a radioactive gas which has been identified as a human carcinogen. Radon gas is typically
associated with fine-grained rock and soil, and results from the radioactive decay of radium. The
U.S. EPA recommends that homeowners in areas with radon screening levels greater than 4
Picocurries per liter (pCi/L) conduct mitigation of radon gas to reduce exposure.
Sections 307 and 309 of the Indoor Radon Abatement Act of 1988 (IRAA) directed the U.S. EPA to
list and identify areas of the U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. U.S. EPA’s
Map of Radon Zones (EPA-402-R-93-071) assigns each of the 3,141 counties in the US to one of
three zones based on radon potential:
• Zone 1 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level greater than 4 pCi/L.
• Zone 2 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level between 2 and 4
pCi/L.
• Zone 3 counties have a predicted average indoor radon screening level less than 2 pCi/L.
Based on such factors as indoor radon measurements, geology, aerial radioactivity, and soil
permeability; the U.S. EPA has identified EPA has identified Orange County as Zone 3 (i.e., low
potential for radon gas). EEI does not consider radon as a significant environmental concern at this
time.
3.8.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls
Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB’s) are used in electrical equipment, particularly in capacitors and
transformers, because they are electrically nonconductive and stable at high temperatures. PCB’s
persist in the environment, accumulate in organisms, and concentrate in the food chain. The disposal
of these compounds is regulated under the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA, 1976), which
banned the manufacture and distribution of PCB’s. By Federal definition, PCB equipment contains
500 parts per million (ppm) or more of PCB’s, where PCB-contaminated equipment contains PCB
concentrations greater than 50 ppm but less than 500 ppm.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), under TSCA guidance, regulates the removal and
disposal of all sources of PCB’s containing 50 ppm or more. Any electrical equipment containing
dielectric insulating fluids or coolants, manufactured prior to 1976, should be considered as
potentially PCB-containing. This includes transformers, capacitors, and fluorescent light fittings. In
addition, PCB’s may also be found as a stabilizer in older lubricating oils, pesticide extenders, cutting
oils, hydraulic fluids (i.e. like those likely present within the hydraulic lifts on the subject property),
paints, sealants, and flame retardants (UNEP, 1999). Also, due to the age of the some of the
structures (pre-1978) on the subject property, the structures may contain older fluorescent lighting
mounts and/or interior electrical transformers. Older lighting fixtures and/or electrical transformers
may contain small amounts of PCBs, and should be evaluated prior to removal.
21
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
4.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE
4.1 Purpose
The purpose of our site reconnaissance was to physically observe the subject site, site structures, and
adjoining properties for conditions indicating an existing release, past release, or threatened release of any
hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures on the subject site, or into soil and/or groundwater
beneath the subject property. This would include any evidence of contamination, distressed vegetation,
petroleum-hydrocarbon surface staining, waste drums, USTs, ASTs, illegal dumping, or improper waste
storage/handling. Detailed information pertaining to our site reconnaissance is provided in the text below.
4.2 Subject Site
On January 18, 2012, EEI personnel conducted a site reconnaissance to visually observe the subject site and
adjoining properties for conditions indicating a potential recognized environmental concern. Concerns would
include any evidence of contamination, distressed vegetation, petroleum-hydrocarbon staining, waste drums,
illegal dumping, or improper waste storage and/or handling. Visual conditions present during the site
reconnaissance are documented in the Photographic Log (Appendix F), and summarized in Table 3.
The subject property encompasses approximately 13-acres on four parcels. The subject property is occupied
with 4 commercial buildings identified as: 905 and 915 E Katella (APN 082-261-23); 917 E Katella (APN
082-261-24) Part of same large building as 905/915; 1005, 1015 and 1025 E Katella (APN 082-261-27); and
1105 E Katella (APN 082-261-28). EEI inspected each of the onsite buildings and a summary is provided
below:
905-917 East Katella
EEI was accompanied by Steve Schloemer of Colliers International, agent for owner, whom provided access
to all areas and rooms of the building. The building consists of 174,795 square feet, and is occupied with the
following tenants: New Image Office Design (located in northwest corner and west-central portions of
building) is a modular office furniture sales and installation business. This area included mainly warehouse
space used for product storage
Golden West Medical (located on the ground floor in the south central portion along Katella Avenue) – is a
24-hour urgent care center with physical therapy and ongoing treatment for some cases. A mezzanine floor,
located directly above Golden West medical, is currently used for storage and conference rooms, but was
formerly occupied by Joshua Casey, a safety training/seminar provider.
Evriholder Products (located in the southeastern corner and east central portion of building) - imports low-
cost "impulse" items for sale in bulk to retailers such as Wal-Mart and Kmart, etc. Items are stored in boxes
stacked in the warehouse. The area also includes minor office space used mostly for shipping/receiving.
Tandem Design (and sub tenant Terra Tile) (northeast corner of the building) - transports, and assembles
display booths used by various clients for trade shows and conventions. Terra tiles stores and sells ceramic
tiles.
22
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
No evidence of significant hazardous materials or hazardous waste storage was noted. Small quantities of
paint, lubricants, cleaning products were noted in tenant spaces occupied by New Image Office Design and
Evriholder Products. In addition these two tenants had forklifts operated by either propane or electricity
(battery). Small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste were noted at Golden West Medical.
1005, 1015 and 1025 (also 1005 - nine-unit storage building)
EEI was accompanied by Travis Rosenbaum, property manager for owner Ewing Enterprises (aka See
Development). Building 1005, a nine-unit storage building was not accessible, and housed miscellaneous
storage. Building 1015, Suites C and G, and building 1025, Suites C, D, F, and G, were accessed, and
consisted of two multi-tenant office buildings (single-story) with rear warehouse space and rollup doors
facing an interior driveway/alley. The two buildings are essentially identical (mirror image).
Building 1015 has six tenants including uses such as cross-fit training (Al Amato), Electrical contracting
(Telco Electric), printer/copier repair (Digitech business solutions), and general storage (Infinity rental,
Western Dental Service, and Perfect One).
Building 1025 has eight tenants including uses such as custom auto parts and accessories (RBR Motorsports),
off road motorcycle repair and parts (Axxis Motorsports), General construction (O C & C Construction),
concrete cutting (Pro Cut) and general storage (Brooks Totlebensmith, Arsh Imports, and Elizabeth Bellara).
One tenant, Christopher Beliovsky, conducts repairs and refurbishes his personal automobiles in his suite.
Minor quantities of cleaning products, lubricants, and or paint were noted in all of the suites visited, in
addition, small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, as well as used tires, were noted in suites occupied
by Axxis Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsky. In general, housekeeping was adequate to good, with no
evidence of significant spillage/leakage, or significant accumulation of waste. All interiors of the suites were
paved with concrete, minimizing concerns in that regard.
1105 East Katella Avenue
EEI was accompanied by the property owner Mr. Ron Marshall, who has owned the property since 1977. The
Mr. Stox Restaurant has occupied the address since approximately 1969. EEI accessed all areas of the
building. The restaurant building consists of large dining areas, lounges, and an exterior patio lounge. The
kitchen and refrigeration area is located in the rear of the building. A wine cellar built into floor plan is
located at ground level, while the remaining portions of the building were constructed with a raised floor.
With the exception of the minor chemical storage described above, no evidence of contamination, distressed
vegetation, petroleum-hydrocarbon surface staining, waste drums, USTs, ASTs, illegal dumping, or improper
waste storage/handling, was noted during the site reconnaissance.
23
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
TABLE 4 - Summary of Site Reconnaissance
Item Concerns Comments
General Housekeeping No No concerns observed.
Surface Spills No No concerns observed.
Stained Surfaces No No concerns observed.
Fill Materials No No concerns observed.
Pits/Ponds/
Lagoons No No concerns observed.
Surface Impoundments No No concerns observed.
ASTs/USTs No No concerns observed.
Distressed Vegetation No No concerns observed.
Wetlands No No concerns observed.
Electrical Substations No No concerns observed.
Areas of Dumping No No concerns observed.
Transformers No No concerns observed.
Waste/Scrap Storage No No concerns observed.
Chemical Use/Storage No
905-917-Small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning products; propane or
electric batteries (New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products); small
quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste (Golden West Medical);
1015-1025- Minor quantities of cleaning products, lubricants, and or paint were
noted in all of the suites; small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, and
used tires (Axxis Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsky).
4.3 Adjacent Properties
The subject property is generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties to in all directions. It is
immediately bound by Omni Duct (1700 South Lewis Street) to the north, East Katella Avenue to the south, a
vacant lot and residential property to the east, and South Lewis Street to the west. A former gas station
(Former Unocal -1818 South Lewis Street) is located to the southwest at the northeast corner of East Katella
Avenue and South Lewis Street.
None of the adjacent properties were identified as having environmental related issues on any of the databases
researched. Several nearby sites have reported releases and are discussed under Section 3.3 Regulatory
Database Search. Based on various reasons, theses sites are not considered an environmental concern.
24
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
5.0 FINDINGS AND OPINIONS
Based on the information obtained in this ESA, EEI has the following findings and opinions:
• Known or suspected REC’s – No known or suspected REC’s have been revealed during the
preparation of this ESA.
Historical REC’s – No historical REC’s have been revealed during the preparation of this ESA.
De Minimis Conditions – The following de minimis condition has been revealed during the
preparation of this ESA.
EEI observed small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning products; propane/electric batteries in the
New Image Office Design and Evriholder Products suites, and small quantities of pharmaceutical
products and bio-waste in the Golden West Medical suite in building 905-917 East Katella Avenue.
Small quantities of motor oil, waste oil, and fuel, and used tires were observed in the Axxis
Motorsports and Christopher Beliovsk suites. Minor quantities of cleaning products, lubricants, and
or paint were noted in all of the suites in building 1015-1025 East Katella Avenue
6.0 DATA GAPS
Section 3.2.20 (ASTM 1527-05) defines a data gap as “a lack or inability to obtain information required by
the practice despite good faith efforts of the environmental professional to gather such information.”
6.1 Historical Data Gaps
Based on the information obtained during the course of this investigation, no historical data gaps were
encountered.
6.2 Regulatory Data Gaps
Based on the information obtained during the course of this investigation, no regulatory data gaps were
encountered.
6.3 Onsite Data Gaps
Based on the information obtained during the course of this investigation, no onsite data gaps were
encountered.
6.4 Deviations from ASTM Practice
Section 12.10 (ASTM 1527-05), states that all deletions and deviations from this practice shall be listed
individually and in detail, including client imposed constraints, and all additions should be listed. EEI
believes that there are no exceptions to, or deletions from, the ASTM Designation E1527-05 Guidelines.
25
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
7.0 CONCLUSIONS
We have performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in conformance with the scope and
limitations of ASTM Designation E1527-05 at the subject property located at 905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015,
1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue, City of Anaheim, California. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this
practice are described in Section 6.0 of this report. This Phase I ESA has revealed no evidence of recognized
environmental conditions in connection with the property.
26
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
27
8.0 REFERENCES
California Department of Water Resources, Water Data Library (WDL), Website
(http://www.water.ca.gov/waterdatalibrary), accessed January 2012.
California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG), 2002, California Geomorphic Provinces, Note 36, dated
May 27.
California State Water Resources Control Board, California Regional Water Quality Control Board-Santa Ana
Region, Water Quality Control Plan - Santa Ana River Basin (9): 1995.
City of Anaheim, General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact Report, No. 330, SCH
#2003041105, May 25, 2004. http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=1626
Department of Toxic Substances (DTSC), Website (http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/), EnviroStor
database, accessed January 2012.
Federal Emergency Management Act (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), Website
http://msc.fema.gov/webapp/wcs/stores/servlet/FemaWelcomeView?storeId=10001&catalogId=10001&langId=-1
accessed January 2012.
Google Earth®, 2012, Version 6.0.
Orange County Water District (OCWD), 1982, Talbert Barrier Status Report, July 1979-June 1982, dated
November 1982.
Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), 1995, Water Quality Control Plan – Santa
Ana River Basin Region 8: California State Water Resources Control Board Publication.
Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 1998, Faults in California - Los Angeles Region.
State Water Resources Control Board, Website, GeoTracker database (http://www.geotracker.swrcb.ca.gov/),
accessed January 2012.
United Nations Environmental Programme, 1999, Guidelines for the Identification of PCBs and Materials
Containing PCBs.
United States Department of Agriculture - Soil Conservation Service, 1978, Soil Survey of Orange County
and Western Part of Riverside County, California.
United States Geological Survey (USGS), 1981, 7.5 Minute Topographic Map, Anaheim, California
Quadrangle, scale 1:24,000.
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
FIGURES
0
Scale: 1" = 1,700'
Note All Locations Are Approximate
FIGURE 1
SITE LOCATION MAP
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP
Commercial Property
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue
APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28
Anaheim, California 92805
EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Created February 2012
1,700FT 3,400FT1,020FT
SITE
LOCATION
Map Source: USGS Anaheim, California 7.5 Minute Quadrangle map (USGS, 1981)
0
Scale: 1" = 400'
Note All Locations Are Approximate
FIGURE 2
AERIAL SITE MAP
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP
Commercial Property
905, 915, 917, 1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue
APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27, and 082-261-28
Anaheim, California 92805
EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Created February 2012
400 FT 800 FT240 FT
Map Source: Google Earth®, Image Date: March 7, 2011
SUBJECT
PROPERTY
BOUNDARY
Omni Duct
Vacant VacantResidentialLight IndustrialFormer
Gas Station
905 - 917
1005101510251105
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
APPENDIX A
RESUME OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONAL
BERNARD A. SENTIANIN, CPG, RG, REA
PRINCIPAL GEOLOGIST
SUMMARY
As Principal Geologist of EEI since 1997, Mr. Sentianin provides consulting and technical
services as a project manager, expert witness, and senior geologist for investigation and
cleanup efforts at sites impacted by Petroleum Hydrocarbons, heavy metals, pesticides, and
chlorinated solvents. As a remediation specialist, he has hands on experience designing,
installing, and managing large scale projects involving above ground and in-situ bioremediation,
soil vapor extraction, sparging, and groundwater extraction/treatment. He has over 22 years of
environmental project management experience, and 25 years professional geologic experience.
Mr. Sentianin has extensive experience in planning, implementing and evaluating Phase I and
Phase II environmental assessments in commercial real estate transactions following ASTM
E1527-05, E1903-97 (-02), E2600-10, and 40 CFR Part 312 (AAI).
EDUCATION
1985 Bachelor of Science, Geology, California State University, Bakersfield
1989 Master of Science, Geological Sciences, San Diego State University
REGISTRATIONS/CERTIFICATIONS
Registered Environmental Assessor I No. 3477, State of California.
Professional Geologist No. 5530, State of California.
Certified Professional Geologist No. 9059, American Institute of Professional Geologists
OSHA 40-Hour HAZWOPER Training and 8-Hour Refreshers
WORK HISTORY
1991 TO 1997 Senior Geologist, Senior Project Manager
PW ENVIRONMENTAL
Established in-house engineering and consulting services for mid-sized
environmental contractor. Established regulatory, vendor, and client contacts.
Initiated policies governing technical report content and format and instituted in-
house training program for new technical staff. Selected prioritized and procured
required support equipment. Actively managed Phase I and Phase II
investigation and remediation projects. Reviewed assessment data, prepared
feasibility studies, and evaluated remedial alternatives while preparing Remedial
Action Plans (RAP) for fuel, heavy metal, and solvent-impacted sites. Prepared
health-based risk assessment on large cleanup site adjacent to health care
facility. Permitted, implemented, and successfully completed the first in-situ
groundwater bioremediation system in Ventura County. Reviewed and
implemented numerous Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessments
throughout Central and Southern California.
1989 TO 1991 STAFF/Project Geologist
NACHANT ENVIRONMENTAL, INC.
Planned, implemented, and managed environmental site investigations and
remediation projects following appropriate regulatory and professional guidelines.
Prepared and reviewed project cost proposals, correspondence, regulatory
permits, assessment and investigation reports, and remedial action plans.
1987 TO 1989 TEACHING ASSISTANT
SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY – DEPARTMENT OF GEOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND
DEPARTMENT OF ENGINEERING
REPRESENTATIVE PROJECTS
Globe Mills, Sacramento CA - Conducted Phase I and Phase II environmental site assessment,
evaluated environmental concerns for adaptive reuse project on behalf of Sacramento Housing
and Redevelopment Agency. Managed and coordinated site cleanup, obtaining regulatory
closure from the Sacramento County Environmental Management Division.
K Street Corridor – Sacramento, CA. Evaluated and conducted Phase I environmental site
assessments on a multi-block area of downtown Sacramento, as well as a number of individual
properties in other areas within the K Street Corridor, on behalf of the City of Sacramento
Downtown Development Group.
Southside Garden and Fremont Mews, Sacramento, CA – Conducted Phase I/Phase II
environmental site assessments and evaluated environmental concerns on three community
garden projects on behalf of the Capitol Area Development Authority. Coordinated regulatory
oversight with Sacramento County Environmental Management Division and the State Office of
Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Prepared an SAP and facilitated compliance with a
Brownfield Grant from EPA Region 9. Prepared and evaluated RFP’s from cleanup contractors
and provided remediation oversight and management. Prepared closure documentation and
obtained regulatory concurrence for both the Southside Garden and Fremont Mews projects.
Electronics Manufacturing Facility/Fueling Depot, Santa Monica, CA. Performed soil and
groundwater investigation, feasibility testing and evaluation of fuel hydrocarbon and chlorinated
solvent plumes. Prepared RAP with design criteria for soil vapor extraction. After approval of
RAP by State regulators, implemented and successfully completed remediation at site,
obtaining closure.
Former Aerospace Facility, Santa Ana, CA. Evaluated existing Phase I and Phase II
assessments. Performed soil, soil vapor, and groundwater investigations of chlorinated solvent
plumes at multiple locations on site. Modeled and evaluated potential plume source areas.
Initiated site specific sampling protocol for chlorinated solvents. Negotiated with lead regulatory
agency regarding regional contamination issues and site closure requirements.
Major Land Owner/Developer, San Juan Capistrano, CA. Conducted Phase I and Phase II
environmental site assessments at multiple sites in southern Orange County. Evaluated
potential environmental concerns related to sand & gravel operations, fueling facilities,
ordinance testing facilities, aerospace engineering labs, vehicle maintenance and repair
facilities, agricultural operations, and illicit dump sites.
Major Fast Food Restaurant Chain, Multiple Locations, CA. Conducted Phase I and Phase II
environmental site assessments at multiple sites throughout California. Evaluated potential
environmental concerns related to historic property uses and potential effects on site operations.
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
APPENDIX B
PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORTS
1
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
Visit Us on our Website: www.fntic.com
ISSUING OFFICE: 1300 Dove Street, Suite 310 • Newport Beach, CA 92660
949 622-5000 • FAX Call for Fax
PRELIMINARY REPORT
Title Officer: David James
Title No.: 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No.: CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
TO: Colliers-Seeley
One Park Plaza, Suite 900
Irvine, CA 92614
ATTN: Stephen Schloemer
PROPERTY ADDRESS: 905 and 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California
EFFECTIVE DATE: November 22, 2011, 07:30 A.M.
The form of policy or policies of title insurance contemplated by this report is:
CLTA Standard Coverage Policy - 1990
1. THE ESTATE OR INTEREST IN THE LAND HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED OR REFERRED TO COVERED BY
THIS REPORT IS:
A FEE as to Parcel(s) A1 and B1;
AN EASEMENT more fully described below as to Parcel(s) A2 and B2
2. TITLE TO SAID ESTATE OR INTEREST AT THE DATE HEREOF IS VESTED IN:
K/L ANAHEIM PROPERTIES I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to Parcels A-1
and A-2 and K/L ANAHEIM PROPERTIES II LLC, a California limited liability company, as
to Parcels B-1 and B-2
3. THE LAND REFERRED TO IN THIS REPORT IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
SEE EXHIBIT “A” ATTACHED HERETO AND MADE A PART HEREOF
MH\MH 12/07/2011
Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
2
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
EXHIBIT "A"
THE LAND REFERRED TO HEREIN BELOW IS SITUATED IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AND IS DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
PARCEL A-1:
PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET
MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED, HOWEVER, THAT
SAID GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS, SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY AND ALL
PURPOSES TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OR THE PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY
LYING ABOVE 500 FEET, MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE OF SAID
PROPERTY, AS RESERVED IN THE DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY,
RECORDED September 28, 1973 IN BOOK 10921, PAGE 428 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL A-2:
THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF
EASEMENT RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF
THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED
December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
PARCEL B-1:
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
FILED IN BOOK 58, PAGE 8 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF SAID PROPERTY LYING BELOW A DEPTH OF 500 FEET
MEASURED VERTICALLY FROM THE CONTOUR OF THE SURFACE THEREOF; PROVIDED HOWEVER THAT
GRANTOR, ITS SUCCESSORS AND ASSIGNS SHALL NOT HAVE THE RIGHT FOR ANY PURPOSE WHATSOEVER
TO ENTER UPON, INTO OR THROUGH THE SURFACE OF THE PROPERTY GRANTED HEREIN OR ANY PART
THEREOF LYING BETWEEN SAID SURFACE AND FIVE HUNDRED (500) FEET BELOW SAID SURFACE, AS SET
FORTH IN DEED FROM SOUTHERN PACIFIC INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, A TEXAS
CORPORATION, RECORDED December 23, 1977 IN BOOK 12506, PAGE 82 OF OFFICIAL RECORDS.
PARCEL B-2:
THOSE CERTAIN EASEMENTS DESCRIBED IN THAT CERTAIN (A) PARTY WALL AGREEMENT AND GRANT OF
EASEMENT RECORDED December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1109 THROUGH 1128, INCLUSIVE OF
THE OFFICIAL RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA AND (B) EASEMENT GRANT DEED RECORDED
December 29, 1978 IN BOOK 12981, PAGES 1144 THROUGH 1156, INCLUSIVE OF THE OFFICIAL RECORDS
OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
APN: 082-261-23,24
Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
3
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
AT THE DATE HEREOF, ITEMS TO BE CONSIDERED AND EXCEPTIONS TO COVERAGE IN
ADDITION TO THE PRINTED EXCEPTIONS AND EXCLUSIONS IN SAID POLICY FORM WOULD BE
AS FOLLOWS:
1. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes,
for the fiscal year 2011-2012, Assessor’s Parcel Number 082-261-23.
Code Area Number: 01007
1st Installment: $55,355.69 OPEN
2nd Installment: $55,355.69 OPEN
Land: $1,096,224.00
Improvements: $2,947,579.00
Exemption: $0.00
Personal Property: $0.00
2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes,
for the fiscal year 2011-2012, Assessor’s Parcel Number 082-261-24.
Code Area Number: 01007
1st Installment: $33,136.52 OPEN
2nd Installment: $33,136.52 OPEN
Land: $1,081,975.00
Improvements: $1,465,695.00
Exemption: $0.00
Personal Property: $0.00
3. The lien of supplemental taxes, if any, assessed pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 3.5
(Commencing with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation code of the State of California.
4. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not disclosed by the public records.
5. The use and control of cienegas and natural streams of water, if any, naturally upon, flowing
across, into or by the herein described land, and the right of way for and to construct irrigation or
drainage ditches through said land to irrigate or drain adjacent lands, as reserved in the deed from
Stearns Ranchos Company to G.W. Bissett, recorded July 27, 1895 in Book 87, Page 269 of Deeds.
6. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a
document.
Granted to: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a partnership composed of Golden Empire
Investment Corporation, a corporation and Birren Corporation, a
corporation, partners
Purpose: Sideyard clearance
Recorded: September 28, 1973, Instrument No. 24842, of Official Records
Affects: As set forth in said instrument
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
4
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
Restrictions on the use, by the owners of said land, of the easement area as set forth in the
easement document shown hereinabove.
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.
7. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a
document.
Granted to: City of Anaheim
Purpose: The installation, maintenance of underground electrical cables, related
equipment
Recorded: December 26, 1973, Book 11039, Page 854, of Official Records
Affects: A portion of Parcel A-1
8. Covenants, conditions and restrictions in the declaration of restrictions but omitting any
covenants or restrictions, if any, including, but not limited to those based upon race, color, religion,
sex, sexual orientation, familial status, marital status, disability, handicap, national origin, ancestry, or
source of income, as set forth in applicable state or federal laws, except to the extent that said
covenant or restriction is permitted by applicable law.
Recorded: December 23, 1977, Book 12506, Page 82, of Official Records
Affects: Parcel B-1
9. A covenant and agreement entitled "Covenant and Agreement"
Executed by: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a general partnership; David E. Sanford; Julius
Fligelman; Harvey Cooper and Mark Ross
In favor of: City of Anaheim
Recorded: April 4, 1978, Book 12621, Page 1581, of Official Records
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
This covenant and agreement shall run with the land and shall be binding upon any future owners,
encumbrancers, their successors or assigns, and shall continue in effect until the advisory agency
approves termination.
Affects: Parcel A-1
10. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Party Wall Agreement and Grant of Easement"
dated December 14, 1978, executed by and between Sequoia Pacific Realco, David E. Sanford, Julius
Fligelman and Molly Fligelman as trustees of the Julius Fligelman and Molly Fligelman Revocable
Trust, Harvey Cooper Mark Ross recorded December 29, 1978, Book 12981, Page 1109, of Official
Records.
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
5
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
11. Easement(s) for the purpose(s) shown below and rights incidental thereto as granted in a
document.
Granted to: Sequoia Pacific Realco, a California general partnership
Purpose: Access to utilities
Recorded: December 29, 1978, Book 12981, Page 1144, of Official Records
Affects: A portion of Parcel A-1
12. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Covenant Not To Contest" dated June 13,
2008, executed by and between K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company
and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company recorded June 17, 2008,
Instrument No. 2008000289659, of Official Records.
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
13. Matters contained in that certain document entitled "Development Agreement No. 2008 -00002"
dated June 24, 2008, executed by and between The City of Anaheim, K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC,
a California limited liability company and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability
company recorded July 23, 2008, Instrument No. 2008000351778, of Official Records.
Reference is hereby made to said document for full particulars.
14. The effect of a "Notice of Special Tax Lien-City of Anaheim Community Facilities District No. 08-1
(Platinum Triangle)" recorded August 12, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008000383751, of Official Records
of Orange County, State of California.
15. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations
secured thereby
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Dated: November 10, 2010
Trustor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to
Parcels A-1 and A-2 and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited
liability company, as to Parcels B-1 and B-2
Trustee: Fidelity National Title Company
Beneficiary: 1st Enterprise Bank
Loan No.:
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636878, of Official Records
16. An assignment of all moneys due, or to become due as rental or otherwise from said land, to
secure payment of an indebtedness, shown below and upon the terms and conditions therein
Amount: $2,000,000.00
Assigned to: 1rst Enterprise Bank
By: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company, as to
Parcels A-1 and A-2 and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited
liability company, as to Parcels B-1 and B-2
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636879, of Official Records
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
6
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
17. An instrument entitled "Hazardous Substances Certificate and Indemnity Agreement" recorded
November 29, 2010 as Instrument/File No. 2010000636880 of Official Records.
Reference is made to said document for full particulars.
18. An unrecorded lease with certain terms, covenants, conditions and provisions set forth therein as
disclosed by the document
Entitled: Subordination, Non-Disturbance and Attornment Agreement and Estoppel
Certificate
Lessor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC
Lessee: Gary Jystad, M.D.
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636881, of Official Records
The present ownership of the leasehold created by said lease and other matters affecting the interest
of the lessee are not shown herein.
An agreement (and the provisions contained therein) which states that said lease is subordinate to
the Deed of Trust
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636878, of Official Records
By document
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636881, of Official Records
19. A financing statement filed in the Office of the County Recorder, showing
Debtor: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC
Secured Party: 1rst Enterprise Bank
Date: None Shown
Recorded: November 29, 2010, Instrument No. 2010000636882, of Official Records
20. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey
of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in possession
thereof.
21. Any easements not disclosed by those public records which impart constructive notice as to matters
affecting title to real property and which are not visible and apparent from an inspection of the
surface of said land.
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
7
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
22. Any rights of the parties in possession of a portion of, or all of, said land, which rights are not
disclosed by the public record.
This Company will require, for review, a full and complete copy of any unrecorded agreement,
contract, license and/or lease, together with all supplements, assignments and amendments thereto,
before issuing any policy of title insurance without excepting this item from coverage. The Company
reserves the right to except additional items and/or make additional requirements after reviewing
said documents.
23. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, this Company will require for review, the following
documents from the Limited Liability Company named below.
Limited Liability Company: K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC, a California limited liability company
(a) A copy of its operating agreement and any and all amendments,
supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate
manager or member.
(b) Confirmation that its Articles of Organization (LLC-1), and Certificate of
Amendment (LLC-2), any restated Articles of Organization (LLC-10) and/or
Certificate of Correction (LLC-11) have been filed with the Secretary of
State.
(c) If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete
current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member.
(d) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction,
evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it was validly formed, is in good
standing and authorized to do business in the state of origin.
(e) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction,
evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it has complied with California
"doing business" laws, if applicable.
After review of the requested documents, the Company reserves the right to add additional items or
make additional requirements prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance.
ITEMS: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
8
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
24. Before issuing its policy of title insurance, this Company will require for review, the following
documents from the Limited Liability Company named below.
Limited Liability Company: K/L Anaheim Properties II LLC, a California limited liability company
(a) A copy of its operating agreement and any and all amendments,
supplements and/or modifications thereto, certified by the appropriate
manager or member.
(b) Confirmation that its Articles of Organization (LLC-1), and Certificate of
Amendment (LLC-2), any restated Articles of Organization (LLC-10) and/or
Certificate of Correction (LLC-11) have been filed with the Secretary of
State.
(c) If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed a full and complete
current list of members certified by the appropriate manager or member.
(d) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction,
evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it was validly formed, is in good
standing and authorized to do business in the state of origin.
(e) If the Limited Liability Company was formed in a foreign jurisdiction,
evidence satisfactory to the Company, that it has complied with California
"doing business" laws, if applicable.
After review of the requested documents, the Company reserves the right to add additional items or
make additional requirements prior to the issuance of any policy of title insurance.
25. This company will require a statement of information from the parties named below in order
to complete this report, based on the effect of documents, proceedings, liens, decrees, or other
matters which do not specifically describe said land, but which, if any do exist, may affect the title or
impose liens or encumbrances thereon. After review of the requested Statement(s) of Infor mation
the Company may have additional requirements before the issuance of any policy of title insurance.
Parties: All parties
(Note: The statement of information is necessary to complete the search and examination of title
under this order. Any title search includes matters that are indexed by name only, and having a
completed statement of information assists the Company in the elimination of certain matters which
appear to involve the parties but in fact affect another party with the same or similar n ame. Be
assured that the statement of information is essential and will be kept strictly confidential to this file).
26. The transaction contemplated in connection with this Report is subject to the review and
approval of the Company's Corporate Underwriting Department. The Company reserves the right to
add additional items or make further requirements after such review.
END OF ITEMS
Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
9
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
Note 1. The Company is not aware of any matters which would cause it to decline to attach the CLTA
Endorsement Form 116 indicating that there is located on said land commercial improvements
known as 905 & 917 East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California to an Extended Coverage Loan
Policy.
Note 2. There are NO deeds affecting said land, recorded within twenty-four (24) months of the date of
this report.
Note 3. If a county recorder, title insurance company, escrow company, real estate broker, real estate
agent or association provides a copy of a declaration, governing document or deed to any
person, California law requires that the document provided shall include a statement regarding
any unlawful restrictions. Said statement is to be in at least 14-point bold face type and may be
stamped on the first page of any document provided or included as a cover page attached t o
the requested document. Should a party to this transaction request a copy of any document
reported herein that fits this category, the statement is to be included in the manner described.
Note 4. Wiring instructions for Fidelity National Title Company, Riverside, CA, are as follows:
Receiving Bank: Union Bank of California
(800) 849-6466
Irvine, CA 92614
ABA Routing No.: 122000496
Credit Account Name: Fidelity National Title Company - Major Accounts Payoff/Admin
11870 Pierce St. Suite 100, Riverside, CA 92505
Credit Account No.: 9100586999
Reference No.: 11-725142114
These wiring instructions are for this specific transaction involving the Title Department of the
Newport Beach office of Fidelity National Title Company. These instructions therefore should not
be used in other transactions without first verifying the information with our accounting
department. It is imperative that the wire text be exactly as indicated. Any extraneous
information may cause unnecessary delays in confirming the receipt of funds.
Note 5. Any documents being executed in conjunction with this transaction must be signed in the
presence of an authorized Company employee, an authorized employee of an agent, an
authorized employee of the insured lender, or by using Bancserv or other approved third-party
service. If the above requirements cannot be met, please call the company at the number
provided in this report.
NOTES: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
10
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
OWNER'S DECLARATION
The undersigned hereby declares as follows:
1. (Fill in the applicable paragraph and strike the other)
a. Declarant ("Owner") is the owner or lessee, as the case may be, of certain premises located
at ____________________________, further described as follows: See Preliminary
Report/Commitment No. __________ for full legal description (the "Land").
b. Declarant is the _____________ of ___________ ("Owner"), which is the owner or lessee, as
the case may be, of certain premises located at _________________________, further
described as follows: See Preliminary Report/Commitment No. ___________ for full legal
description (the "Land").
2. (Fill in the applicable paragraph and strike the other.)
a. During the period of six months immediately preceding the date of this declarati on no work
has been done, no surveys or architectural or engineering plans have been prepared, and no
materials have been furnished in connection with the erection, equipment, repair, protection or
removal of any building or other structure on the Land or in connection with the improvement of
the Land in any manner whatsoever.
b. During the period of six months immediately preceding the date of this declaration certain
work has been done and materials furnished in connection with _________ upon the Land in the
approximate total sum of $_________________, but no work whatever remains to be done and
no materials remain to be furnished to complete the construction in full compliance with the
plans and specifications, nor are there any unpaid bills incurred for labor and materials used in
making such improvements or repairs upon the Land, or for the services of architects, surveyors
or engineers, except as follows: ____________________________. Owner, by the undersigned
Declarant, agrees to and does hereby indemnify and hold harmless Fidelity National Title
Insurance Company against any and all claims arising therefrom.
3. Owner has not previously conveyed the Land; is not a debtor in bankruptcy (and if a
partnership, the general partner thereof is not a debtor in bankruptcy); and has not received
notice of any pending court action affecting the title to the Land.
4. Except as shown in the above-referenced Preliminary Report/Commitment, there are no
unpaid or unsatisfied mortgages, deeds of trust, Uniform Commercial Code financing
statements, claims of lien, special assessments, or taxes that constitute a lien against the Land
or that affect the Land but have not been recorded in the public records.
5. The Land is currently in use as ____________; _____________ occupy/occupies the Land;
and the following are all of the leases or other occupancy rights affecting the Land:
______________________________________.
6. There are no other persons or entities that assert an ownership interest in the Land , nor are
there unrecorded easements, claims of easement, or boundary disputes that affect the Land.
7. There are no outstanding options to purchase or rights of first refusal affecting the Land.
NOTES: (continued) Title No. 11-725142114-DJ
Locate No. CAFNT0972-0972-0051-0725142114
11
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11/17/06)
This declaration is made with the intention that Fidelity National Title Insurance Company (the
"Company") and its policy issuing agents will rely upon it in issuing their title insurance policies
and endorsements. Owner, by the undersigned Declarant, agrees to indemnify the Company
against loss or damage (including attorneys fees, expenses, and costs) incurred by the Company
as a result of any untrue statement made herein.
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct and that this declaration
was executed on ________________ at _____________.
Signature: ______________________________________
END OF NOTES
Chicago Title Company
Builders Services Division
2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521 -3400
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 1
Title Department: Escrow Department:
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr
Email: votelt@ctt.com & ken.cyr@ctt.com
Phone: (619) 521-3553 & (619) 521-3555
Fax: (619) 521-3608
Order No.: 930023912-U50
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Lorri Beasley
Email: BeasleyL@ctt.com
Phone: (949) 724-3114
Fax: (949) 724-3186
Reference No.: 128200004-M19
FIRST AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT
Property Address: 1005 East Katella, Anaheim, CA
Dated as of: January 12, 2012 at 7:30 am
In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company
hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies
of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring
against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred
to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions
and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy
or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause.
When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters
shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the
parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner’s Policies of Title
Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain
coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are
available from the office which issued this report.
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the
issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be
assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company
Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in
Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with
notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be
carefully considered.
It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of
title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE A
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 2
1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is:
A fee
2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
See Development limited partnership, a California limited partnership
3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Orange and is
described in the Legal Description, attached hereto:
END OF SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 930023912-U50
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 3
PARCEL 1, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
APN 082-261-27
END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 4
At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed
Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows:
1. Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2012 - 2013 that
are a lien not yet due.
2. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for
the fiscal year 2011 - 2012
1st Installment: $20,751.09 (Paid)
2nd Installment: $20,751.09
Penalty and Cost: $2,098.10 (Due after April 10)
Homeowners Exemption: $none
Code Area: 01007
Assessors Parcel Number: 082-261-27
3. The property included within this subdivision is subject to annual assessme nts (commonly referred
to as Mello-Roos assessments) to pay the installation and maintenance cost of improvements and
are currently being collected with the property taxes.
a) ANA EL 2002 BOND 05
b) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 02
c) ANAH EL 2010,SR 2011
d) NOCCD 2002 BOND2005R
e) ANA EL 2002 BOND2007
f) NOCCD 2002 BOND 2003
g) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 03
h) NOCCD 2002 BND 2002A
i) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 06
j) ANAHEIM CITY 1980 BD
k) ANA EL 2002 BOND2004
4. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the
provisions of Part 0.5, Chapter 3.5 or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4 respectively (commencing
with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a result of the
transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A; or as a result of changes in ownership or new
construction occurring prior to date of policy.
5. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records.
6. An easement for the purpose shown below and rights incidental thereto as set forth in a document.
Granted to: City of Anaheim
Purpose: installation and maintenance of a water fireline assembly
Recorded: November 28, 1978 in book 12939, page 1457 of Official Records
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 5
Affects: That portion of said land more particularly described therein
7. A deed of trust to secure an indebtedness in the amount shown below, and any other obligations
secured thereby
Amount: $2,325,000.00
Dated: June 30, 2004
Trustor: See Development Limited Partnership, a California Limited
Partnership
Trustee: Fidelity National Title Insurance Company
Beneficiary: Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada, a Canadian Corporation
Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613523 of Official Records
8. An assignment
Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613524 of official records
of certain of the lessor’s interests under leases referred therein, which assignment recites, among
other things, that it is given as additional security for the Deed of Trust
Recorded: July 7, 2004 as instrument no. 04-613523 of official records
9. Intentionally omitted.
10. A document entitled “Development Agreement No. 2007-00002”, executed by City of Anaheim, a
Charter City and Municipal Corporation and Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Trust,
the Marshall Family Trust and See Development Limited Partnership, subject to all the terms,
provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded March 20, 2008 as instrument no. 2008-
129034 of Official Records.
11. An assessment for the District shown below.
District: City of Anaheim Community Facilities District no. 08-1 (Platinum
Triangle)
Disclosed By: District map
Recorded: February 4, 2008 as File No. 2008000051133, Official Records
A document entitled “Notice of Special Tax Lien” pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5
of the California Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the Mello-Roos Community
Facility Act of 1982 recorded August 8, 2008 as File No. 2008000383751, Official Records.
Order No.: 930023912-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 6
12. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title
Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or b y inquiry of the parties in
possession thereof.
This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to
arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the
removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage.
13. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases.
This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements,
assignments, and amendments for review.
END OF SCHEDULE B
Order No.: 930023912-U50
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 7
0:
Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the
insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any
controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to this policy,
any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or
other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued
if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title
Insurance coverage.
Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of
Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters
shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of th e
parties.
Note No. 3: The requirement that a copy of the partnership agreement of the See Development
limited partnership, a California limited partnership be furnished to this Company, together with all
supplements, amendments, etc., thereto.
Note No. 4: Your open order request indicates that a Limited Liability Company will be acquiring,
encumbering or conveying real property in your transaction. Under the provisions of “the
California Limited Liability Act, effective September 30, 1994” the following will be required:
1. A copy of the Articles of Organization (and all amendments, if any) that has been filed with
the Secretary of State.
2. The requirement that this Company be provided with a copy of the Operation Agreeme nt.
The copy provided must be certified by the appropriate manager or member that it is a copy
of the current operating agreement.
3. If the Limited Liability Company is member-managed then this Company must be provided
with a current list of the member names.
Note No. 5: Plotted easements
Order No.: 930023912-U50
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 8
ATTACHMENT ONE
PRIVACY STATEMENT
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions
From Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this i nformation by selecting the link. For
those of you who are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copy of this information has been
submitted for your review.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Privacy Statement (10-21-03)
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies’ Privacy Statement
July 1, 2001
We recognize and respect the privacy of today’s consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state privacy laws.
We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information (”Personal Information”), and to
whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy
Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with
applicable privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;
From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates or others;
From our Internet web sites;
From the public records maintained by government entities that we wither obtain directly from those entities, or
from our affiliates or others; and
From consumer or other reporting agencies
Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Information
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or
intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with
providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes.
Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate
settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal Information:
to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with se rvices you have requested;
to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or perform marketing or other functions on our
behalf; and
to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we bel ieve you may find
of interest.
In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when your direct or give us permission, when we are required by law t o
do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal In formation when otherwise
permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is needed to enforce our rights arising out of any
agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such
documents may contain your Personal Information.
Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion
Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom
your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or
deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the
costs incurred in responding to such requests.
All requests must be made in writing to the following address:
Privacy Compliance Officer
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
601 Riverside Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Multiple Products or Services:
If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more that one privacy notice from us. We
apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.
ATTACHMENT ONE
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 10
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss,
costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes building and zoning
ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning:
• land use
• improvements on the land
• land division
• environmental protection
This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these
matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date.
This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and
13 of Covered Title Risks.
2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless:
• a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on
the Policy Date
• the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on
you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking
3. Title Risks:
• that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you
• that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date – unless
they appeared in the public records
• that result in no loss to you
• that first affect your title after the Policy Date – this does not limit
the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title
Risks
4. Failure to pay value for your title.
5. Lack of a right:
• to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in Item 3 of Schedule A
OR
• in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land
This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title
Risks.
In addition to the Exclusions you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the expenses resulting from:
1. Any right, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not
shown by the public records.
2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not
limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks.
3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and
which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the
forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks.
4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land,
whether or not shown by the public records.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees
or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions
or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any
violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice
of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or
alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,
but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured
claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or
for the estate or interest insured by this policy.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured
the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating
the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws.
SCHEDULE B, PART I
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or
by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the
public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the
land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 11
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92)
WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees
or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions
or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any
violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under t his
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the
extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured
mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or
to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for
street improvements under construction or completed at Date of
Policy); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of
priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the
lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work
related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent
to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds
of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of
Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance.
7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of
the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of
federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws,
that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee
being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a
result of the application of the doctrine or equitable
subordination; or
(iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee
being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclus ions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which ar ise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or
by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the
public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the
land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation
(including those relating to building and zoning) restricting,
regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify
or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant
prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under
this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 11, 13, or 14); or
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 12
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-
business laws of the state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the
Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth-in-lending law.
6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction
creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk
13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public
Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 11(b).
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Excl usions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on
real property or by the Public Records;
(b) Proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or
assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not
shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by
the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an
accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the
Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records.
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees
or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions
or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any
violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest
insured by this policy.
4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured
the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation
of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights
laws, that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proce edings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or
by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the
public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the
land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 13
2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation
(including those relating to building and zoning) restricting,
regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or
limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant
prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under
this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.
4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction
vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9
of this policy.
5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of
transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage :
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the Public Records; (b) proceedings by a public agency
that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency o r
by the Public Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by
the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an
accurate and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown
by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records.
CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and
regulations concerning:
a. building
b. zoning
c. Land use
d. improvements on the Land
e. Land division
f. environmental protection
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these
matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public
Records at the Policy Date.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14,
15, 16, 17 or 24.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be
constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This
Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of
the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date.
3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at
the Policy Date; or
b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You
if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking.
4. Risks:
a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not
they appear in the Public Records;
b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless
they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
c. that result in no loss to You; or
d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the
coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25.
5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lack of a right:
a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or
18.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 14
LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows:
• For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.
The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:
Our Maximum Dollar
Your Deductible Amount Limit of Liability
Covered Risk 14: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 15: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
(whichever is less)
ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the
dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land
is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of
any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental
regulations, except to the extent that s notice of the enforcement
thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from
a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been
recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion
does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13,
14, and 16 of this policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the
Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of
this policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without Knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant
prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under
this policy;
(c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph
does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in which the Land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in
Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending
law.
6. Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority
which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks
7, 8(e) and 26.
7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien
of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after
the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no
longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and
every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged
thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title,
the existence of which are Known to the Insured at:
(a) The time of the advance; or
(b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured
Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of
Interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would
have been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit
the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have
been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with
applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations
of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public
Records at Date of Policy.
(continued)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 15
You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced
residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one
qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts.
If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction, you
do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow
or title services in this transaction.
If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is subject of your current
transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier
transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or
approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount.
Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this
transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a
discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is
required to determine if you qualify for a discount which is subject to other terms and conditions.
(continued)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 16
Chicago Title Company
Builders Services Division
2365 Northside Drive, Suite 500, San Diego, CA 92108 (619) 521-3400
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 1
Title Department: Escrow Department:
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Tom Votel/Ken Cyr
Email: votelt@ctt.com & ken.cyr@ctt.com
Phone: (619) 521-3553 & (619) 521-3555
Fax: (619) 521-3608
Order No.: 930023837-U50
Chicago Title Company
Attn: Lorri Beasley
Email: BeasleyL@ctt.com
Phone: (949) 724-3114
Fax: (949) 724-3186
Reference No.: 118200342
FIRST AMENDED PRELIMINARY REPORT
Property Address: 1105 Katella Avenue East, Anaheim, CA
Dated as of: January 19, 2012 at 7:30 am
In response to the application for a policy of title insurance referenced herein, Chicago Title Company
hereby reports that it is prepared to issue, or cause to be issued, as of the date hereof, a policy or policies
of Title Insurance describing the land and the estate or interest therein hereinafter set forth, insuring
against loss which may be sustained by reason of any defect, lien or encumbrance not shown or referred
to as an Exception herein or not excluded from coverage pursuant to the printed Schedules, Conditions
and Stipulations or Conditions of said Policy forms.
The printed Exceptions and Exclusion from the coverage and Limitations on Covered Risks of said Policy
or Policies are set forth in Attachment One. The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause.
When the Amount of Insurance is less than that set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters
shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the
parties. Limitations on Covered Risks applicable to the CLTA and ALTA Homeowner’s Policies of Title
Insurance which establish a Deductible Amount and a Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability for certain
coverages are also set forth in Attachment One. Copies of the policy forms should be read. They are
available from the office which issued this report.
This report (and any supplements or amendments hereto) is issued solely for the purpose of facilitating the
issuance of a policy of title insurance and no liability is assumed hereby. If it is desired that liability be
assumed prior to the issuance of a policy of title insurance, a Binder or Commitment should be requested.
The policy(s) of title insurance to be issued hereunder will be policy(s) of Chicago Title Insurance Company
Please read the exceptions shown or referred to herein and the exceptions and exclusions set forth in
Attachment One of this report carefully. The exceptions and exclusions are meant to provide you with
notice of matters which are not covered under the terms of the title insurance policy and should be
carefully considered.
It is important to note that this preliminary report is not a written representation as to the condition of
title and may not list all liens, defects, and encumbrances affecting title to the land.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY
Order No.: 930023837-U50
SCHEDULE A
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 2
1. The estate or interest in the land hereinafter described or referred to covered by this report is:
A Fee
2. Title to said estate or interest at the date hereof is vested in:
Ronald M. Marshall, trustee and Deborah L. Marshall, trustee of the Ronald W. Marshall and
Deborah L. Marshall Revocable Trust, dated January 7, 1989, an undivided 1/2 interest and to the
Marshall Family Trust, dated February 14, 2000, an undivided 1/2 interest, Charles B. Marshall and
Susan M. Marshall, trustees
Vesting Deed: August 07, 2001 as Instrument No. 2001-0540746.
3. The land referred to in this report is situated in the State of California, County of Orange and is
described in the Legal Description, attached hereto:
END OF SCHEDULE A
Order No.: 930023837-U50
LEGAL DESCRIPTION
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 3
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS
SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 111, PAGES 40 TO 42 INCLUSIVE OF PARCEL MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA.
APN 082-261-28
END OF LEGAL DESCRIPTION
Order No.: 930023837-U50
SCHEDULE B
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 4
At the date hereof, items to be considered and exceptions to coverage in addition to the printed
Exceptions and Exclusions in said policy form would be as follows:
1. Property taxes, including any assessments collected with taxes, for the fiscal year 2012 - 2013 that
are a lien not yet due.
1A. Property taxes, including any personal property taxes and any assessments collected with taxes, for
the fiscal year 2011 - 2012
1st Installment: $24,216.61 (Paid)
2nd Installment: $24,216.61
Penalty and Cost: $2,444.66 (Due after April 10)
Homeowners Exemption: $none
Code Area: 01007
Assessors Parcel Number: 082-261-28
2. The lien of supplemental or escaped assessments of property taxes, if any, made pursuant to the
provisions of Part 0.5, Chapter 3.5 or Part 2, Chapter 3, Articles 3 and 4 respectively (commencing
with Section 75) of the Revenue and Taxation Code of the State of California as a resu lt of the
transfer of title to the vestee named in Schedule A; or as a result of changes in ownership or new
construction occurring prior to date of policy.
3. The property included within this subdivision is subject to annual assessments (commo nly referred
to as Mello-Roos assessments) to pay the installation and maintenance cost of improvements and
are currently being collected with the property taxes.
a) ANA EL 2002 BOND 05
b) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 02
c) ANAH EL 2010,SR 2011
d) NOCCD 2002 BOND2005R
e) ANA EL 2002 BOND2007
f) NOCCD 2002 BOND 2003
g) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 03
h) NOCCD 2002 BND 2002A
i) ANA H/S 2002 BOND 06
j) ANAHEIM CITY 1980 BD
k) ANA EL 2002 BOND2004
4. The use and control of cienegas and natural streams of water, if any, naturally upon, flowing across,
into or by the herein described land, and the right of way for and to construct irrigation or drainage
ditches through said land to irrigate or drain adjacent lands, as provided in deed(s).
Recorded: June 4, 1919 in Book 332 Page 362 of Deeds
Order No.: 930023837-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 5
5. A document entitled “Memorandum Of Purchase Agreement And Escrow Instructions”, dated
January 29, 2007 executed by Ronald W. Marshall, and Deborah L. Marshall, Co-Trustees of the
Ronald W. Marshall and Deborah L. Marshall Revocable Trust, dated January 7, 1989;and Charles
B. Marshall and Susan M. Marshall Co-Trustees of the Marshall Family Trust, dated February 14,
2000 and Integral Partners, LLC, a California Limited Liability Company, subject to all the terms,
provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded February 2, 2007 as instrument number
2007-72414, Official Records.
6. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which may exist or arise by reason of the following facts
disclosed by an ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey, dated as of February 6, 2006, prepared by or
under the direction of Rory S. Williams, LS 6654, for Hunsaker and Associates, Irvine, Inc., : Job
no. 2873-4
A. there is a block wall straddling a portion of the east line of parcel 2.
B. two building overhangs encroach .10 and .40 feet onto parcel 2 from the east adjoiner.
C an aluminum storage area overhang encroaches .10 feet into parcel 2 from the east
adjoiner.
D an aluminum storage area overhang encroaches .50 feet into the east adjoiner from parcel
2.
E. a fence on parcel 1projecting from the east face of the building on parcel 2 shown as
1105 East Katella Avenue encroaches an undisclosed distance onto the east adjoiner.
F. utility wires between a pole in katella avenue and a building on the east adjoiner
overhang parcel 2 near the southeast corner thereof.
7. A document entitled “Development Agreement No. 2007-00002”, subject to all the terms,
provision(s) and conditions therein contained, recorded March 20, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008-
129034 Official Records.
7A. An assessment for the District shown below.
District: City of Anaheim Community Facilities District no. 08-1 (Platinum
Triangle)
Disclosed By: District map
Recorded: February 4, 2008 as File No. 2008000051133, Official Records
A document entitled “Notice of Special Tax Lien” pursuant to the requirements of Section 3114.5
of the California Streets and Highways Code and Section 53328.3 of the M ello-Roos Community
Facility Act of 1982 recorded August 8, 2008 as File No. 2008000383751, Official Records.
8. Water rights, claims or title to water, whether or not shown by the public records.
Order No.: 930023837-U50
SCHEDULE B
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 6
9. Any easements not disclosed by those public records which impart constructive notice and which
are not visible and apparent from an inspection of the surface of said land.
10. Matters which may be disclosed by an inspection and/or by a correct ALTA/ACSM Land Title
Survey of said land that is satisfactory to this Company, and/or by inquiry of the parties in
possession thereof.
This office must be notified at least 7 business days prior to the scheduled closing in order to
arrange for an inspection of the land; upon completion of this inspection you will be notified of the
removal of specific coverage exceptions and/or additional exceptions to coverage.
11. Any rights of parties in possession of said land, based on any unrecorded lease, or leases.
This Company will require a full copy of any unrecorded lease, together with all supplements,
assignments, and amendments for review.
END OF SCHEDULE B
Order No.: 930023837-U50
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 7
0:
Note No. 1: The policy of title insurance will include an arbitration provision. The Company or the
insured may demand arbitration. Arbitrable matters may include, but are not limited to, any
controversy or claim between the Company and the insured arising out of or relating to thi s policy,
any service of the Company in connection with its issuance or the breach of a policy provision or
other obligation. Please ask your escrow or title officer for a sample copy of the policy to be issued
if you wish to review the arbitration provisions and any other provisions pertaining to your Title
Insurance coverage.
Note No. 2: The policy to be issued may contain an arbitration clause. When the Amount of
Insurance is less than the amount, if any, set forth in the arbitration clause, all arbitrable matters
shall be arbitrated at the option of either the Company or the Insured as the exclusive remedy of the
parties.
Note No. 3: If title is to be insured in the Trustee(s) of a Trust, (or if their act is to be insured ), this
Company will require a copy of the Trust Agreement including all exhibits listing real and personal
property transferred into the Trust together with complete copies of any amendments or
modifications thereto. The Company must also be furnished with a verification of all present
Trustees stating that the copy being furnished is a true and correct copy of the entire Trust
Agreement including all modifications or amendments; that the Trust is currently in full force and
effect; and that it has not been revoked or terminated.
Note No. 4: The requirement that a copy of the partnership agreement of the Shopoff Advisors,
L.P., a Delaware limited partnership be furnished to this Company, together with all supplements,
amendments, etc., thereto.
Note No. 5: We find no open Deeds of Trust of record. Please verify by inquiry of your escrow
personnel and or agents whether or not we have overlooked something and advise the title
department accordingly prior to closing.
Order No.: 930023837-U50
INFORMATIONAL NOTES
(continued)
CLTA Preliminary Report Form - Modified (11-17-06)
Page 8
ATTACHMENT ONE
PRIVACY STATEMENT
IMPORTANT INFORMATION:
For those of you receiving this report by electronic delivery the Privacy Statement and Exclusions
From Coverage are linked to this report. Please review this information by selecting the link. For
those of you who are receiving a hard copy of this report, a copy of this information has been
submitted for your review.
CHICAGO TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY
Privacy Statement (10-21-03)
Fidelity National Financial Group of Companies’ Privacy Statement
July 1, 2001
We recognize and respect the privacy of today’s consumers and the requirements of applicable federal and state priv acy laws.
We believe that making you aware of how we use your non-public personal information (”Personal Information”), and to
whom it is disclosed, will form the basis for a relationship of trust between us and the public that we serve. This Privacy
Statement provides that explanation. We reserve the right to change this Privacy Statement from time to time consistent with
applicable privacy laws.
In the course of our business, we may collect Personal Information about you from the following sources:
From applications or other forms we receive from you or your authorized representative;
From your transactions with, or from the services being performed by, us, our affiliates or others;
From our Internet web sites;
From the public records maintained by government entities that we wither obtain directly from those entities, or
from our affiliates or others; and
From consumer or other reporting agencies
Our Policies Regarding The Protection Of The Confidentiality And Security Of Your Personal Informati on
We maintain physical, electronic and procedural safeguards to protect your Personal Information from unauthorized access or
intrusion. We limit access to the Personal Information only to those employees who need such access in connection with
providing products or services to you or for other legitimate business purposes.
Our Policies and Practices Regarding the Sharing of Your Personal Information
We may share your Personal Information with our affiliates, such as insurance companies, agents, and other real estate
settlement service providers. We may also disclose your Personal Information:
to agents, brokers or representatives to provide you with services you have requested ;
to third-party contractors or service providers who provide services or per form marketing or other functions on our
behalf; and
to others with whom we enter into joint marketing agreements for products or services that we believe you may find
of interest.
In addition, we will disclose your Personal Information when your direct or give us permission, when we are required by law to
do so, or when we suspect fraudulent or criminal activities. We also may disclose your Personal Information when otherwise
permitted by applicable privacy laws such as, for example, when disclosure is n eeded to enforce our rights arising out of any
agreement, transaction or relationship with you.
One of the important responsibilities of some of our affiliated companies is to record documents in the public domain. Such
documents may contain your Personal Information.
Right To Access Your Personal Information And Ability To Correct Errors Or Request Change Or Deletion
Certain states afford you the right to access your Personal Information and, under certain circumstances, to find out to whom
your Personal Information has been disclosed. Also, certain states afford you the right to request correction, amendment or
deletion of your Personal Information. We reserve the right, where permitted by law, to charge a reasonable fee to cover the
costs incurred in responding to such requests.
All requests must be made in writing to the following address:
Privacy Compliance Officer
Fidelity National Financial, Inc.
601 Riverside Drive
Jacksonville, FL 32204
Multiple Products or Services:
If we provide you with more than one financial product or service, you may receive more that one privacy notice from us. We
apologize for any inconvenience this may cause you.
ATTACHMENT ONE
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 10
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION
RESIDENTIAL TITLE INSURANCE POLICY (6-1-87)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, you are not insured against loss,
costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes building and zoning
ordinances and also laws and regulations concerning:
• land use
• improvements on the land
• land division
• environmental protection
This exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of these
matters which appear in the public records at Policy Date.
This exclusion does not limit the zoning coverage described in Items 12 and
13 of Covered Title Risks.
2. The right to take the land by condemning it, unless:
• a notice of exercising the right appears in the public records on
the Policy Date
• the taking happened prior to the Policy Date and is binding on
you if you bought the land without knowing of the taking
3. Title Risks:
• that are created, allowed, or agreed to by you
• that are known to you, but not to us, on the Policy Date – unless
they appeared in the public records
• that result in no loss to you
• that first affect your title after the Policy Date – this does not limit
the labor and material lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title
Risks
4. Failure to pay value for your title.
5. Lack of a right:
• to any land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in Item 3 of Schedule A
OR
• in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch your land
This exclusion does not limit the access coverage in Item 5 of Covered Title
Risks.
In addition to the Exclusions you are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys’ fees, and the expenses resulting from:
1. Any right, interests, or claims of parties in possession of the land not
shown by the public records.
2. Any easements or liens not shown by the public records. This does not
limit the lien coverage in Item 8 of Covered Title Risks.
3. Any facts about the land which a correct survey would disclose and
which are not shown by the public records. This does not limit the
forced removal coverage in Item 12 of Covered Title Risks.
4. Any water rights or claims or title to water in or under the land,
whether or not shown by the public records.
CALIFORNIA LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION STANDARD COVERAGE POLICY - 1990
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees
or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building or zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions
or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any
violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien, or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or notice
of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation or
alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) whether or not recorded in the public records at Date of Policy,
but created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured
claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage or
for the estate or interest insured by this policy.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
the applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured
the estate of interest insured by this policy or the transaction creating
the interest of the insured lender, by reason of the operation of federal
bankruptcy, state insolvency or similar creditors' rights laws.
SCHEDULE B, PART I
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which arise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or
by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims which are not shown by the
public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the
land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 11
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION LOAN POLICY (10-17-92)
WITH ALTA ENDORSEMENT-FORM 1 COVERAGE
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are express ly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees
or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions
or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any
violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded b y (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (except to the
extent that this policy insures the priority of the lien of the insured
mortgage over any statutory lien for services, labor or material or
to the extent insurance is afforded herein as to assessments for
street improvements under construction or completed at Date of
Policy); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the insured claimant had paid value for the insured mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in which the land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the insured mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
insured mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth in lending law.
6. Any statutory lien for services, labor or materials (or the claim of
priority of any statutory lien for services, labor or materials over the
lien of the insured mortgage) arising from an improvement or work
related to the land which is contracted for and commenced subsequent
to Date of Policy and is not financed in whole or in part by proceeds
of the indebtedness secured by the insured mortgage which at Date of
Policy the insured has advanced or is obligated to advance.
7. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction creating the interest of
the mortgagee insured by this policy, by reason of the operation of
federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights laws,
that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee
being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the subordination of the interest of the insured mortgagee as a
result of the application of the doctrine or equitable
subordination; or
(iii) the transaction creating the interest of the insured mortgagee
being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Cove rage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which ar ise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or
by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the
public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the
land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
2006 ALTA LOAN POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation
(including those relating to building and zoning) restricting,
regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify
or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant
prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under
this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 11, 13, or 14); or
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 12
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of an Insured to comply with applicable doing-
business laws of the state where the Land is situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability in whole or in part of the lien of the
Insured Mortgage that arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury or any consumer credit
protection or truth-in-lending law.
6. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction
creating the lien of the Insured Mortgage, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer, or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk
13(b) of this policy.
7. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the Insured Mortgage in the Public
Records. This Exclusion does not modify or limit the coverage
provided under Covered Risk 11(b).
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclus ions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on
real property or by the Public Records;
(b) Proceedings by a public agency that may result in taxes or
assessments, or notices of such proceedings, whether or not
shown by the records of such agency or by the Public Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown by the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by
the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an
accurate and complete land survey of the Land and not shown by the
Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records.
AMERICAN LAND TITLE ASSOCIATION OWNER'S POLICY (10-17-92)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys' fees
or expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the dimensions
or area of the land or any parcel of which the land is or was a
part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of any
violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental regulations,
except to the extent that a notice of the enforcement thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the land has been recorded in the
public records at Date of Policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the public records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or othe r matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the insured claimant;
(b) not known to the Company, not recorded in the public records at
Date of Policy, but known to the insured claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the insured claimant prior
to the date the insured claimant became an insured under this
policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the insured claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy; or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the insured claimant had paid value for the estate or interest
insured by this policy.
4. Any claim, which arises out of the transaction vesting in the insured
the estate or interest insured by this policy, by reason of the operation
of federal bankruptcy, state insolvency, or similar creditors' rights
laws, that is based on:
(i) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(ii) the transaction creating the estate or interest insured by this policy
being deemed a preferential transfer except where the preferential
transfer results from the failure:
(a) to timely record the instrument of transfer; or
(b) of such recordation to impart notice to a purchaser for value
or a judgment or lien creditor.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclus ions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage Policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys' fees or expenses) which ar ise by reason of:
1. Taxes or assessments which are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the public records. Proceedings by a public agency
which may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or
by the public records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests or claims which are not shown by the
public records but which could be ascertained by an inspection of the
land or which may be asserted by persons in possession thereof.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, which are not
shown by the public records.
4. Discrepancies, conflicts in boundary lines, shortage in area,
encroachments, or any other facts which a correct survey would
disclose, and which are not shown by the public records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b) or (c) are shown by the public records.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 13
2006 ALTA OWNER’S POLICY (06-17-06)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy, and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys ' fees,
or expenses that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance, permit, or governmental regulation
(including those relating to building and zoning) restricting,
regulating, prohibiting, or relating to
(i) the occupancy, use, or enjoyment of the Land;
(ii) the character, dimensions, or location of any improvement
erected on the Land;
(iii) the subdivision of land; or
(iv) environmental protection;
or the effect of any violation of these laws, ordinances, or
governmental regulations. This Exclusion 1(a) does not modify or
limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 5.
(b) Any governmental police power. This Exclusion 1(b) does not
modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered Risk 6.
2. Rights of eminent domain. This Exclusion does not modify or limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risk 7 or 8.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims, or other matters
(a) created, suffered, assumed, or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant
prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under
this policy;
(c) resulting in no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (however, this
does not modify or limit the coverage provided under Covered
Risk 9 and 10); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage that would not have been sustained if
the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Title.
4. Any claim, by reason of the operation of federal bankruptcy, state
insolvency, or similar creditors’ rights laws, that the transaction
vesting the Title as shown in Schedule A, is
(a) a fraudulent conveyance or fraudulent transfer; or
(b) a preferential transfer for any reason not stated in Covered Risk 9
of this policy.
5. Any lien on the Title for real estate taxes or assessments imposed by
governmental authority and created or attaching between Date of
Policy and the date of recording of the deed or other instrument of
transfer in the Public Records that vests Title as shown in Schedule A.
The above policy form may be issued to afford either Standard Coverage or Extended Coverage. In addition to the above Exclusions from Coverage, the Exceptions
from Coverage in a Standard Coverage policy will also include the following Exceptions from Coverage:
EXCEPTIONS FROM COVERAGE
This policy does not insure against loss or damage (and the Company will not pay costs, attorneys’ fees or expenses) that arise by reason of:
1. (a) Taxes or assessments that are not shown as existing liens by the
records of any taxing authority that levies taxes or assessments on real
property or by the Public Records; (b) proc eedings by a public agency
that may result in taxes or assessments, or notices of such
proceedings, whether or not shown by the records of such agency or
by the Public Records.
2. Any facts, rights, interests, or claims that are not shown in the Public
Records but that could be ascertained by an inspection of the Land or
that may be asserted by persons in possession of the Land.
3. Easements, liens or encumbrances, or claims thereof, not shown by
the Public Records.
4. Any encroachment, encumbrance, violation, variation, or adverse
circumstance affecting the Title that would be disclosed by an
accurate and complete land survey of the Land and that are not shown
by the Public Records.
5. (a) Unpatented mining claims; (b) reservations or exceptions in
patents or in Acts authorizing the issuance thereof; (c) water rights,
claims or title to water, whether or not the matters excepted under (a),
(b), or (c) are shown by the Public Records.
CLTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
ALTA HOMEOWNER'S POLICY OF TITLE INSURANCE (10-22-03)
EXCLUSIONS
In addition to the Exceptions in Schedule B, You are not insured against loss, costs, attorneys' fees, and expenses resulting from:
1. Governmental police power, and the existence or violation of any law
or government regulation. This includes ordinances, laws and
regulations concerning:
a. building
b. zoning
c. Land use
d. improvements on the Land
e. Land division
f. environmental protection
This Exclusion does not apply to violations or the enforcement of t hese
matters if notice of the violation or enforcement appears in the Public
Records at the Policy Date.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 14,
15, 16, 17 or 24.
2. The failure of Your existing structures, or any part of them, to be
constructed in accordance with applicable building codes. This
Exclusion does not apply to violations of building codes if notice of
the violation appears in the Public Records at the Policy Date.
3. The right to take the Land by condemning it, unless:
a. a notice of exercising the right appears in the Public Records at
the Policy Date; or
b. the taking happened before the Policy Date and is binding on You
if You bought the Land without Knowing of the taking.
4. Risks:
a. that are created, allowed, or agreed to by You, whether or not
they appear in the Public Records;
b. that are Known to You at the Policy Date, but not to Us, unless
they appear in the Public Records at the Policy Date;
c. that result in no loss to You; or
d. that first occur after the Policy Date - this does not limit the
coverage described in Covered Risk 7, 8.d, 22, 23, 24 or 25.
5. Failure to pay value for Your Title.
6. Lack of a right:
a. to any Land outside the area specifically described and referred to
in paragraph 3 of Schedule A; and
b. in streets, alleys, or waterways that touch the Land.
This Exclusion does not limit the coverage described in Covered Risk 11 or
18.
ATTACHMENT ONE
(CONTINUED)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 14
LIMITATIONS ON COVERED RISKS
Your insurance for the following Covered Risks is limited on the Owner’s Coverage Statement as follows:
• For Covered Risk 14, 15, 16 and 18, Your Deductible Amount and Our Maximum Dollar Limit of Liability shown in Schedule A.
The deductible amounts and maximum dollar limits shown on Schedule A are as follows:
Our Maximum Dollar
Your Deductible Amount Limit of Liability
Covered Risk 14: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 10,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 15: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 16: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 5,000.00 $ 25,000.00
(whichever is less)
Covered Risk 18: 1.00% of Policy Amount or $ 2,500.00 $ 5,000.00
(whichever is less)
ALTA EXPANDED COVERAGE RESIDENTIAL LOAN POLICY (10/13/01)
EXCLUSIONS FROM COVERAGE
The following matters are expressly excluded from the coverage of this
policy and the Company will not pay loss or damage, costs, attorneys fees or
expenses which arise by reason of:
1. (a) Any law, ordinance or governmental regulation (including but not
limited to building and zoning laws, ordinances, or regulations)
restricting, regulating, prohibiting or relating to (i) the occupancy,
use, or enjoyment of the Land; (ii) the character, dimensions or
location of any improvement now or hereafter erected on the
Land; (iii) a separation in ownership or a change in the
dimensions or areas of the Land or any parcel of which the Land
is or was a part; or (iv) environmental protection, or the effect of
any violation of these laws, ordinances or governmental
regulations, except to the extent that s notice of the enforcement
thereof or a notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from
a violation or alleged violation affecting the Land has been
recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion
does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13,
14, and 16 of this policy.
(b) Any governmental police power not excluded by (a) above,
except to the extent that a notice of the exercise thereof or a
notice of a defect, lien or encumbrance resulting from a violation
or alleged violation affecting the Land has been recorded in the
Public Records at Date of Policy. This exclusion does not limit
the coverage provided under Covered Risks 12, 13, 14, and 16 of
this policy.
2. Rights of eminent domain unless notice of the exercise thereof has
been recorded in the Public Records at Date of Policy, but not
excluding from coverage any taking which has occurred prior to Date
of Policy which would be binding on the rights of a purchaser for
value without Knowledge.
3. Defects, liens, encumbrances, adverse claims or other matters:
(a) created, suffered, assumed or agreed to by the Insured Claimant;
(b) not Known to the Company, not recorded in the Public Records at
Date of Policy, but Known to the Insured Claimant and not
disclosed in writing to the Company by the Insured Claimant
prior to the date the Insured Claimant became an Insured under
this policy;
(c) resulting In no loss or damage to the Insured Claimant;
(d) attaching or created subsequent to Date of Policy (this paragraph
does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks 8, 16,
18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 and 26); or
(e) resulting in loss or damage which would not have been sustained
if the Insured Claimant had paid value for the Insured Mortgage.
4. Unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage because of the
inability or failure of the Insured at Date of Policy, or the inability or
failure of any subsequent owner of the indebtedness, to comply with
applicable doing business laws of the state in w hich the Land is
situated.
5. Invalidity or unenforceability of the lien of the Insured Mortgage, or
claim thereof, which arises out of the transaction evidenced by the
Insured Mortgage and is based upon usury, except as provided in
Covered Risk 27, or any consumer credit protection or truth in lending
law.
6. Real property taxes or assessments of any governmental authority
which become a lien on the Land subsequent to Date of Policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided under Covered Risks
7, 8(e) and 26.
7. Any claim of invalidity, unenforceability or lack of priority of the lien
of the Insured Mortgage as to advances or modifications made after
the Insured has Knowledge that the vestee shown in Schedule A is no
longer the owner of the estate or interest covered by this policy. This
exclusion does not limit the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
8. Lack of priority of the lien of the Insured Mortgage as to each and
every advance made after Date of Policy, and all interest charged
thereon, over liens, encumbrances and other matters affecting the title,
the existence of which are Known to the Insured at:
(a) The time of the advance; or
(b) The time a modification is made to the terms of the Insured
Mortgage which changes the rate of interest charged, if the rate of
Interest is greater as a result of the modification than it would
have been before the modification. This exclusion does not limit
the coverage provided in Covered Risk 8.
9. The failure of the residential structure, or any portion thereof to have
been constructed before, on or after Date of Policy in accordance with
applicable building codes. This exclusion does not apply to violations
of building codes if notice of the violation appears in the Public
Records at Date of Policy.
(continued)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 15
You may be entitled to receive a $20.00 discount on escrow services if you purchased, sold or refinanced
residential property in California between May 19, 1995 and November 1, 2002. If you had more than one
qualifying transaction, you may be entitled to multiple discounts.
If your previous transaction involved the same property that is the subject of your current transaction, you
do not have to do anything; the Company will provide the discount, provided you are paying for escrow
or title services in this transaction.
If your previous transaction involved property different from the property that is subject of your current
transaction, you must - prior to the close of the current transaction - inform the Company of the earlier
transaction, provide the address of the property involved in the previous transaction, and the date or
approximate date that the escrow closed to be eligible for the discount.
Unless you inform the Company of the prior transaction on property that is not the subject of this
transaction, the Company has no obligation to conduct an investigation to determine if you qualify for a
discount. If you provide the Company information concerning a prior transaction, the Company is
required to determine if you qualify for a discount which is subject to other terms and conditions.
(continued)
Attachment One (11-17-06)
Page 16
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
APPENDIX C
HISTORICAL AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS/
TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS/CITY DIRECTORY SEARCH
Track Info Services City Directory Report DISCLAIMER The information contained in this report has been obtained from publicly available sources and other secondary sources of information produced by entities other than Track Info Services, LLC (Track Info Services). Although great care has been taken by Track Info Services in compiling and checking the information contained in this report to insure it is current and accurate, Track Info Services disclaims any and all liability for any errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in such information and data, whether attributable to inadvertence or otherwise, and for any consequences arising therefrom. The data provided hereunder neither purports to be nor constitutes legal or medical advice. It is further understood that Track Info Services makes no responsibility with respect to our customer's, its employees', clients', or customers' use thereof. Track Info Services shall not be liable for any special, consequential, or exemplary damages resulting in whole or in part, from customers' use of the data. Liability on the part of Track Info Services, LLC (Track Info Services) is limited to the monetary value paid for this report. The report is valid only for the geographical parameters specified on the cover page of this report, and any alteration or deviation from this description will require a new report. This report does not constitute a legal or licensed opinion. Prepared for: Bernie Sentianin – EEI Client Job No/Name: SHO 71418.1 TIS Log No: 68493 Subject Property: 905, 915, 917, 1015, 1025, 1105 E Katella Ave Anaheim, CA 92805 January 17, 2012
Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 2 of 7Addresses of Potential Concern: A summary of gas stations, cleaners, automotive shops, and other address occupants of potential environmental concern located on the subject street, within the vicinity of the target address. The addresses listed are included in the body of the report. YEAR ADDRESS OCCUPANT 1997 902 E Katella Ave Anaheim Unocal 76 1992 902 E Katella Ave 1015 E Katella Ave Anaheim Unocal 76 Comnty Tire Anaheim No additional Addresses of Potential Concern identified on the subject street, within vicinity of the Target address.
Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 3 of 7 905, 915, 917, 1015, 1025, 1105 E Katella Ave 2009 Haines: North Orange County p. 324 2002 Haines: North Orange County p. 340
Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 4 of 71997 Haines: North Orange County p. 272 1992 Haines: North Orange County p. 205
Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 5 of 7 1987 Pacific Telephone: Orange County North p. 38 1983 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 38
Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 6 of 7 1980 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 40 1974 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 38 1969 Pacific Telephone: Orange County p. 30 End Of Search due to: A) earlier directory or street listing not found; B) listing out of range, listings re-numbered, or no numeric listings
Track Info Services City Directory Report Page 7 of 7 Notes: Subject Property is in bold, the next lowest address on the same side of the street is to the left and the next highest address on the same side of the street is to the right. The next lowest and highest addresses are the closest listed for the same side of the street as the target and may or may not be adjacent. They are the closest listed in the source consulted. Occupant names and statements such as 'Vacant', 'No info' and 'Under constr' are verbatim. Occupant names are listed once per address although they may be listed multiple times in the directory. A forward slash between names indicates multiple companies listed under same main company. Previous refers to source and entries listed above what is being read. The source used is cited in the row above referenced address and occupant. Entries in italics are research notes.
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
APPENDIX D
ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS SEARCH
FirstSearch Technology Corporation
TMEnvironmental FirstSearch Report
Target Property:
905 EAST KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92805
Job Number: SHO-71418.1
PREPARED FOR:
EEI
2195 Faraday Ave., Suite K
Carlsbad, CA 92008
01-11-12
Tel: (781) 551-0470 Fax: (781) 551-0471
Environmental FirstSearch is a registered trademark of FirstSearch Technology Corporation. All rights reserved.
Environmental FirstSearch
Search Summary Report
Target Site:905 EAST KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92805
FirstSearch Summary
Notice of Disclaimer
Waiver of Liability
- Continued on next page -
Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS
NPL Y 10-25-11 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
NPL Delisted Y 10-25-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0
CERCLIS Y 09-30-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0
NFRAP Y 09-30-11 0.50 0 1 0 0 -0 1
RCRA COR ACT Y 09-13-11 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
RCRA TSD Y 09-13-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0
RCRA GEN Y 09-13-11 0.25 0 8 13 --0 21
RCRA NLR Y 09-13-11 0.12 0 1 ---0 1
Federal Brownfield Y 12-01-11 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0
ERNS Y 10-18-11 0.12 0 3 ---0 3
Tribal Lands Y 12-01-05 1.00 0 0 0 0 0 1 1
State/Tribal Sites Y 07-14-11 1.00 0 2 0 0 5 0 7
State Spills 90 Y 09-28-11 0.12 0 0 ---0 0
State/Tribal SWL Y 01-10-12 0.50 0 0 0 0 -1 1
State/Tribal LUST Y 09-28-11 0.50 0 6 2 12 -0 20
State/Tribal UST/AST Y 06-13-11 0.25 0 5 3 --0 8
State/Tribal EC Y NA 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0
State/Tribal IC Y 06-01-11 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0
State/Tribal VCP Y 07-14-11 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0
State/Tribal Brownfields Y NA 0.50 0 0 0 0 -0 0
Releases Y 10-18-11 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0
State Permits Y 09-28-11 0.12 0 0 ---0 0
State Other Y 07-14-11 0.25 0 1 0 --0 1
Oil & Gas Wells Y 01-08-01 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0
Federal IC/EC Y 11-01-11 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0
Dry Cleaners Y NA 0.25 0 0 0 --0 0
HW Manifest Y 08-02-10 0.12 0 6 ---0 6
-TOTALS-0 33 18 12 5 2 70
Due to the limitations, constraints, and inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch
Technology Corp., certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency sites residing in FirstSearch Technology
Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent
the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the
actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the
actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such
information.
Although FirstSearch Technology Corp. uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, FirstSearch Technology Corp. does not and can not warrant
the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an
understanding of FirstSeaarch Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and
map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations.
Environmental FirstSearch
Search Summary Report
Target Site:905 EAST KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92805
FirstSearch Summary
Notice of Disclaimer
Waiver of Liability
Database Sel Updated Radius Site 1/8 1/4 1/2 1/2> ZIP TOTALS
Due to the limitations, constraints, and inaccuracies and incompleteness of government information and computer mapping data currently available to FirstSearch
Technology Corp., certain conventions have been utilized in preparing the locations of all federal, state and local agency sites residing in FirstSearch Technology
Corp.'s databases. All EPA NPL and state landfill sites are depicted by a rectangle approximating their location and size. The boundaries of the rectangles represent
the eastern and western most longitudes; the northern and southern most latitudes. As such, the mapped areas may exceed the actual areas and do not represent the
actual boundaries of these properties. All other sites are depicted by a point representing their approximate address location and make no attempt to represent the
actual areas of the associated property. Actual boundaries and locations of individual properties can be found in the files residing at the agency responsible for such
information.
Although FirstSearch Technology Corp. uses its best efforts to research the actual location of each site, FirstSearch Technology Corp. does not and can not warrant
the accuracy of these sites with regard to exact location and size. All authorized users of FirstSearch Technology Corp.'s services proceeding are signifying an
understanding of FirstSeaarch Technology Corp.'s searching and mapping conventions, and agree to waive any and all liability claims associated with search and
map results showing incomplete and or inaccurate site locations.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Information Report
Request Date:01-11-12 Search Type:COORD
Requestor Name:BERNIE SENTIANIN Job Number:SHO-71418.1
Standard:ASTM-05 Filtered Report
Target Site:905 EAST KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92805
Demographics
Sites:70 Non-Geocoded:2 Population:NA
Radon:NA
Fire Insurance Map Coverage:No
Site Location
Degrees (Decimal) Degrees (Min/Sec) UTMs
Longitude:-117.896559 -117:53:48 Easting:417011.431
Latitude:33.803781 33:48:14 Northing:3740567.389
Elevation:146 Zone:11
Comment
Comment:
Additional Requests/Services
Adjacent ZIP Codes:Services:
ZIP
Code City Name ST Dist/Dir Sel Requested? Date
Fire Insurance Maps No
Aerial Photographs Yes 01-11-12
Historical Topos Yes 01-11-12
City Directories Yes 01-11-12
Title Search No
Municipal Reports No
Liens No
Historic Map Works No
Online Topos No
Environmental FirstSearch
Target Site Summary Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
TOTAL:70 GEOCODED:68 NON GEOCODED:2 SELECTED:0
No sites found for target address
Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No.
Environmental FirstSearch
Sites Summary Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
TOTAL:70 GEOCODED:68 NON GEOCODED:2 SELECTED:0
Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No.
1 NFRAP ORANGE EMPIRE 1000 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 1 1
CAD049903271/NFRAP-N ANAHEIM CA 92805
1 RCRAGN ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING 1000 E KATELLA ST 0.07 SW - 1 2
CAD049903271/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
1 STATE ORANGE EMPIRE 1000 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 1 3
CAL30330009/REFER: OTHER AGENCY ANAHEIM CA 92805
1 OTHER ORANGE EMPIRE 1000 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 1 4
CAL30330009/REFER: OTHER AGENCY ANAHEIM CA 92805
2 RCRAGN PACIFIC BELL 901 E KATELLA 0.07 SW - 2 5
CAD980735583/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
3 RCRANLR WESTRUX INTL 1110 E KATELLA 0.07 SE 0 6
CAD983639527/NLR ANAHEIM CA 92805
3 UST WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1110 KATELLA 0.07 SE 0 8
TISID-STATE34355/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
3 LUST WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1110 KATELLA AVE 0.07 SE 0 9
T0605901993/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
4 ERNS UNOCAL 1818 S LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 10
182188/FIXED FACILITY ANAHEIM CA 92805
4 ERNS UNOCAL UNOCAL SS#8800 1818 SO. LE 0.08 SW - 2 11
186030/ANAHEIM CA 92805
4 ERNS UNOCAL 1818 S LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 12
465925/UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK ANAHEIM CA 92805
4 UST TOSCO 1818 S LEWIS 0.08 SW - 2 13
ANAHIEM12209/ANAHEIM CA
4 UST UNOCAL (SS 8800)1818 LEWIS 0.08 SW - 2 14
TISID-STATE34204/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
4 LUST STEVE CRAIG PROPERTY 1818 S LEWIS 0.08 SW - 2 15
T0605983677/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92806
4 LUST TOSCO - 76 STATION #8800 1818 LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 16
T0605901266/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
4 LUST TOSCO/76 SS #8800 1818 S LEWIS ST 0.08 SW - 2 17
T060590323/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA
5 RCRAGN GESTETNER CORP 1212 E KATELLA AVE 0.09 SE 0 18
CAD981679194/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92803
6 UST ACTION RENTALS INC 1822 LEWIS 0.10 SW - 2 20
TISID-STATE7221/INACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
6 HWMANIFE C C MYERS INC 1822 S LEWIS RD 0.10 SW - 2 21
CAL000258530/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
7 RCRAGN GESTETNER CORP 1290 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE 0 22
CAD981678659/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
Environmental FirstSearch
Sites Summary Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
TOTAL:70 GEOCODED:68 NON GEOCODED:2 SELECTED:0
Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No.
8 RCRAGN JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 24
CAD981981020/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
8 RCRAGN JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 26
CAD981386469/TRANSPORTER ANAHEIM CA 92805
8 STATE PLATINUM TRIANGLE 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 28
CAL60001110/INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED ANAHEIM CA 92805
8 LUST JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 KATELLA 0.11 SE - 1 30
T0605900867/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92803
8 HWMANIFE TEST AMERICA DRILLING CORP 1016 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SE - 1 31
CAL000264848/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
9 LUST TEXACO SERVICE STATION 818 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SW - 2 32
T0605900569/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92801
9 HWMANIFE TEXACO DOWNSTREAM #211247 818 E KATELLA AVE 0.11 SW - 2 33
CAL000254200/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
10 RCRAGN CLUTCH CO 1832 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 2 34
CA0000435925/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
10 HWMANIFE FASTEEL CORPORATION 1832 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 2 36
CAL000324599/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
11 RCRAGN JOBBER MACHINE 1836 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 2 37
CAD981980477/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
12 UST GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION 1700 S LEWIS ST 0.12 NW + 1 38
TISID-STATE7219/INACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92825
12 HWMANIFE OMMI DUCT SYSTEMS 1700 S LEWIS ST 0.12 NW + 1 39
CAL000212088/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
13 HWMANIFE L & B CONNECTING ROD 1830 S LEWIS ST 0.12 SW - 3 40
CAL000257128/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
14 RCRAGN NATIONAL CRANKSHAFT CO 1848 S LEWIS ST 0.16 SW - 4 41
CAD982496390/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
15 RCRAGN LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS LLC 700 E KATELLA AVE 0.19 SW - 2 43
CAR000016774/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
15 LUST WESTSIDE MATERIALS 700 E KATELLA AVE 0.19 SW - 2 45
T0605900518/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
16 RCRAGN ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ANAHEIM PRI 1701 S LEWIS ST 0.19 NW + 1 46
CAD982438715/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
17 RCRAGN GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC 1140 E HOWELL AVE 0.20 NE + 4 48
CAR000065656/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
18 RCRAGN MALCO SERVICES 1865 S SANTA CRUZ 0.20 SE - 2 50
CAR000053223/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
19 RCRAGN ORANGE COUNTY MICROFILM INC 1456 E KATELLA 0.20 SE + 1 52
CAD982509358/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
Environmental FirstSearch
Sites Summary Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
TOTAL:70 GEOCODED:68 NON GEOCODED:2 SELECTED:0
Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No.
20 RCRAGN PACIFIC IMAGE 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE 0.20 SW - 3 53
CA0000047258/LGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
20 RCRAGN PACIFIC IMAGE, INC 1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE 0.20 SW - 3 55
CAO000047258/LGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
21 RCRAGN AIRPORT COACH 917 E GENE AUTRY WAY 0.21 SW - 4 57
CAD983657537/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
21 RCRAGN RYDER STUDENT TRANS 917 PACIFICO AVE 0.21 SW - 4 59
CAD982048316/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
21 UST RYDER STUDENT TRANS CO 917 PACIFICO AVE 0.21 SW - 4 61
TISID-STATE34120/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
21 LUST RYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE 917 E GENE AUTRY WAY 0.21 SW - 4 62
T0605901626/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
22 RCRAGN LIFE FLEET 1890 S BETMOR LN 0.21 SE - 2 63
CA0000133082/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
23 RCRAGN ORANGE COUNTY AUTO 620 E KATELLA AVE 0.21 SW - 1 65
CAD983588161/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
24 RCRAGN MER CEDES SHOP THE 1884 S SANTA CRUZ 0.22 SE - 3 67
CAD983588153/SGN ANAHEIM CA 92805
25 UST SCOTTS INDEPENDENT 1885 S SANTA CRUZ 0.22 SE - 3 69
ANAHIEMNA5/ANAHEIM CA
25 UST SCOTTS INDEPENDENT PORSCHE 1885 SANTA CRUZ 0.22 SE - 3 70
TISID-STATE34184/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92805
26 LUST JOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL 1858 ANAHEIM WAY 0.26 SW - 4 71
T0605901679/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
27 LUST WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL 1111 HOWELL AVENUE E.0.27 NE + 4 72
T0605974729/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
27 LUST WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS 1111 HOWELL AVE 0.27 NE + 4 73
T0605901991/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92802
28 LUST WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL 1213 HOWELL AVENUE E.0.29 NE + 4 74
T0605906599/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
29 LUST COORS DISRIBUTING COMPANY 1625 S LEWIS ST 0.31 NW + 3 75
T060599039/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92802
30 LUST DANA EDWARDS 1901 S MANCHESTER AVE 0.32 SW - 6 76
T0605900745/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92802
31 LUST NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC.1500 E BABBITT AVE 0.37 NE + 9 77
T0605900234/OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT ANAHEIM CA 92805
32 LUST ARCO #6220 1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 0.39 SE + 3 80
T0605900941/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
33 LUST DEL PISO BRICK COMPANY 1635 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 0.45 NE + 10 81
T0605900097/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92806
Environmental FirstSearch
Sites Summary Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
TOTAL:70 GEOCODED:68 NON GEOCODED:2 SELECTED:0
Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No.
34 LUST CERTRON 1701 STATE COLLEGE 0.46 NE + 10 82
T0605900725/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92805
35 LUST TOSCO CORPORATION SITE 1515 LEWIS 0.46 NW + 7 83
T0605999297/LEAK BEING CONFIRMED ANAHEIM CA 92805
36 LUST UNOCAL 2001 KATELLA 0.48 SE + 6 84
T0605900918/COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED ANAHEIM CA 92801
37 STATE SILGAN PLASTICS CORPORATION 611 E CERRITOS AVE 0.60 NW + 5 85
CAL30300130/REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY ANAHEIM CA 92805
38 STATE ITASCO 2211 E HOWELL AVE 0.67 NE + 10 86
CAL30280129/REFER: RWQCB ANAHEIM CA 92804
39 STATE PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE/WILKE 0.79 SW - 14 88
CAL30880003/NO FURTHER ACTION ANAHEIM CA 92805
40 STATE NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY 2201 E CERRITOS AVE 0.83 NE + 17 90
CAL30280120/ACTIVE ANAHEIM CA 92806
41 STATE THE CITY PLACE NORTH 3745 W CHAPMAN AVE 1.00 SE - 14 92
CAL30000017/REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY ORANGE CA 92868
Environmental FirstSearch
Sites Summary Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
TOTAL:70 GEOCODED:68 NON GEOCODED:2 SELECTED:0
Map ID DB Type Site Name/ID/Status Address Dist/Dir ElevDiff Page No.
SWL ANAHEIM CITY DUMP #7 SW OF SANTA ANA RIVER AND NON GC N/A N/A
SWIS30-CR-0109/CLOSED ANAHEIM CA
TRIBALLA BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFAIRS CONTACT I UNKNOWN NON GC N/A N/A
BIA-92805/ CA 92805
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
NFRAP
SEARCH ID:1 DIST/DIR:0.07 SW ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:1
NAME:ORANGE EMPIRE REV:9/30/11
ADDRESS:1000 E KATELLA ID1:CAD049903271
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:0900449
ORANGE STATUS:NFRAP-N
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 1
DESCRIPTION:
ACTION/QUALITY AGENCY/RPS START/RAA END
ARCHIVE SITE EPA In-House 11/14/1988
DISCOVERY State, Fund Financed 12/1/1987
PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENT State, Fund Financed 11/14/1988
NFRAP: NO FURTHER REMEDIAL ACTION PLANNED
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:18 DIST/DIR:0.07 SW ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:1
NAME:ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1000 E KATELLA ST ID1:CAD049903271
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 2
SITE INFORMATION
OWNER NAME: DOWNEY HEAT TREATING COMPANY
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1000 E KATELLA ST
ANAHEIM, CA
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
331 - PRIMARY METAL MANUFACTURING
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:29 DIST/DIR:0.07 SW ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:1
NAME:ORANGE EMPIRE REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:1000 E KATELLA ID1:CAL30330009
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:HISTORICAL
ORANGE STATUS:REFER: OTHER AGENCY
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 3
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: Historical
Status: Refer: Other Agency
Status Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding:
Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED
Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED
Project Manager:
Supervisor: * MMONROY
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres:
Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED
Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contaminants: * UNSPECIFIED AQUEOUS SOLUTION
Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site: * CERC2
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
LEONARDO MARBLE
CAD049903271
30330009
COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: * Discovery
Completion Date: 1981-09-01 00:00:00
Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED PHONE BOOK SEARCH (1971)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Screening
Completion Date: 1994-10-28 00:00:00
Comments: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report
Completion Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00
Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE HISTORICAL RECORDS DO NOT INDICATE FAC WAS A PROBLEM
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Screening
Completion Date: 1987-05-21 00:00:00
Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
OTHER
SEARCH ID:34 DIST/DIR:0.07 SW ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:1
NAME:ORANGE EMPIRE REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:1000 E KATELLA ID1:CAL30330009
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:REFER: OTHER AGENCY
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 4
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: Historical
Status: Refer: Other Agency
Status Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding:
Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED
Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED
Project Manager:
Supervisor: * MMONROY
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres:
Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED
Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contaminants: * UNSPECIFIED AQUEOUS SOLUTION
Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site: * CERC2
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
LEONARDO MARBLE
CAD049903271
30330009
COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Screening
Completion Date: 1994-10-28 00:00:00
Comments: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report
Completion Date: 1988-04-20 00:00:00
Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE HISTORICAL RECORDS DO NOT INDICATE FAC WAS A PROBLEM
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Screening
Completion Date: 1987-05-21 00:00:00
Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: * Discovery
Completion Date: 1981-09-01 00:00:00
Comments: FACILITY IDENTIFIED PHONE BOOK SEARCH (1971)
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:19 DIST/DIR:0.07 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:2
NAME:PACIFIC BELL REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:901 E KATELLA ID1:CAD980735583
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 5
SITE INFORMATION
OWNER NAME:
OWNER TYPE:
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1854 N NEVILLE
ORANGE, CA 92665
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRANLR
SEARCH ID:23 DIST/DIR:0.07 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:3
NAME:WESTRUX INTL REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1110 E KATELLA ID1:CAD983639527
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:NLR
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 6
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: MG MOWREY
15555 VALLEY VIEW AVE
SANTA FE SPRINGS CA 90670
PHONE: 3104041020
OWNER NAME: WESTRUX INTL
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR_TYPE:
MAILING ADDRESS: 1110 E KATELLA
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 11/30/1996
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: N
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRANLR
SEARCH ID:23 DIST/DIR:0.07 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:3
NAME:WESTRUX INTL REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1110 E KATELLA ID1:CAD983639527
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:NLR
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 7
- ALL OTHER BUSINESS SUPPORT SERVICES
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:42 DIST/DIR:0.07 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:3
NAME:WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS REV:01/01/94
ADDRESS:1110 KATELLA ID1:TISID-STATE34355
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 8
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names
& locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were
never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The
SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). That agency no longer
maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or
facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that
the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not
recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with
a CUPA.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:58 DIST/DIR:0.07 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:3
NAME:WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1110 KATELLA AVE ID1:T0605901993
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 9
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002915T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 2007-08-17 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1997-04-25 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-08-17 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-11-13 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): * No Action
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-08-16 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-11-18 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Unauthorized Release Form
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
ERNS
SEARCH ID:24 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:UNOCAL REV:9/19/90
ADDRESS:1818 S LEWIS ST ID1:182188
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:FIXED FACILITY
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 10
SPILL INFORMATION
DATE OF SPILL: 9/19/1990 TIME OF SPILL: 1100
PRODUCT RELEASED (1): GASOLINE: AUTOMOTIVE (4.23G PB/G
QUANTITY (1): 0
UNITS (1): UNK
PRODUCT RELEASED (2):
QUANTITY (2):
UNITS (2):
PRODUCT RELEASED (3):
QUANTITY (3):
UNITS (3):
MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTED
AIR: NO GROUNDWATER: YES
LAND: NO FIXED FACILITY: NO
WATER: NO OTHER: NO
WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: SOIL
CAUSE OF RELEASE
DUMPING: NO EQUIPMENT FAILURE: NO
NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATOR ERROR: NO
OTHER CAUSE: NO TRANSP. ACCIDENT: NO
UNKNOWN: NO
ACTIONS TAKEN: SOIL EXCAVATED.
RELEASE DETECTION: BELOWGROUND STORAGE TANK/CONTAMINATED SOIL DISCOVERED DURING TANK EXCAVATION
MISC. NOTES:
DISCHARGER INFORMATION
DISCHARGER ID: 182188 DUN & BRADSTREET #:
TYPE OF DISCHARGER: PRIVATE ENTERPRISE
NAME OF DISCHARGER: UNOCAL
ADDRESS: 2190 EAST TOWN CENTER PLC
ANAHEIM CA 92806
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
ERNS
SEARCH ID:25 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:UNOCAL REV:9/19/90 0:
ADDRESS:UNOCAL SS#8800 1818 SO. LEWIS ST ID1:186030
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 11
SPILL INFORMATION
DATE OF SPILL: 9/19/1990 TIME OF SPILL: 1100
PRODUCT RELEASED (1): GASOLINE
QUANTITY (1): 0
UNITS (1): UNK
PRODUCT RELEASED (2):
QUANTITY (2):
UNITS (2):
PRODUCT RELEASED (3):
QUANTITY (3):
UNITS (3):
MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTED
AIR: NO GROUNDWATER: NO
LAND: YES FIXED FACILITY: NO
WATER: NO OTHER: NO
WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: NONE
CAUSE OF RELEASE
DUMPING: NO EQUIPMENT FAILURE: YES
NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATOR ERROR: NO
OTHER CAUSE: NO TRANSP. ACCIDENT: NO
UNKNOWN: NO
ACTIONS TAKEN: SOIL REMOVED BY UNOCAL (RP)
RELEASE DETECTION: CONTAMINATED SOIL FOUND DURING REMOVAL OF UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK.
MISC. NOTES:
DISCHARGER INFORMATION
DISCHARGER ID: 186030 DUN & BRADSTREET #:
TYPE OF DISCHARGER: PRIVATE CITIZEN
NAME OF DISCHARGER: UNOCAL
ADDRESS: 2190 E. TOWN CENTER
ANAHEIM CA 92806-
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
ERNS
SEARCH ID:26 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:UNOCAL REV:9/19/90
ADDRESS:1818 S LEWIS ST ID1:465925
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANK
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 12
SPILL INFORMATION
DATE OF SPILL: 9/19/1990 TIME OF SPILL: 1100
PRODUCT RELEASED (1): GASOLINE: AUTOMOTIVE (4.23G PB/G
QUANTITY (1): 0
UNITS (1): UNK
PRODUCT RELEASED (2):
QUANTITY (2):
UNITS (2):
PRODUCT RELEASED (3):
QUANTITY (3):
UNITS (3):
MEDIUM/MEDIA AFFECTED
AIR: NO GROUNDWATER: NO
LAND: YES FIXED FACILITY: NO
WATER: NO OTHER: NO
WATERBODY AFFECTED BY RELEASE: SOIL
CAUSE OF RELEASE
DUMPING: NO EQUIPMENT FAILURE: NO
NATURAL PHENOMENON: NO OPERATOR ERROR: NO
OTHER CAUSE: YES TRANSP. ACCIDENT: NO
UNKNOWN: NO
ACTIONS TAKEN: SOIL EXCAVATED.
RELEASE DETECTION: BELOWGROUND STORAGE TANK/CONTAMINATED SOIL DISCOVERED DURING TANK EXCAVATION
MISC. NOTES:
DISCHARGER INFORMATION
DISCHARGER ID: 465925 DUN & BRADSTREET #:
TYPE OF DISCHARGER: PRIVATE ENTERPRISE
NAME OF DISCHARGER: UNOCAL
ADDRESS: 2190 EAST TOWN CENTER PLC
ANAHEIM CA 92806-
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:40 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:TOSCO REV:05/24/2000
ADDRESS:1818 S LEWIS ID1:ANAHIEM12209
ANAHEIM CA ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 13
ANAHEIM CERTIFIED & NON COMPLIANT TANKS LIST INFORMATION
According to the Anaheim Fire Dept. the following information is current as of 03/17/03
Certified Petroleum Tanks: 3
Non Petroleum Tanks:
Waste Tanks: 1
Non Petroleum Tank Contents: WASTE OIL
Comments:
Certificate Number: 12209
Date Certificate Issued: 2/1/98
Number of Tags Issued: 3
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:41 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:UNOCAL (SS 8800)REV:01/01/94
ADDRESS:1818 LEWIS ID1:TISID-STATE34204
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 14
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names
& locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were
never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The
SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). That agency no longer
maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or
facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that
the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not
recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with
a CUPA.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:52 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:STEVE CRAIG PROPERTY REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1818 S LEWIS ID1:T0605983677
ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 15
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083004021T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 2011-03-09 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2011-03-09 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-04-14 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Letter - Notice
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-06-18 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Letter - Notice
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:54 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:TOSCO - 76 STATION #8800 REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1818 LEWIS ST ID1:T0605901266
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 16
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001680T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 90UT209
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1995-10-09 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1995-10-09 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:56 DIST/DIR:0.08 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:4
NAME:TOSCO/76 SS #8800 REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1818 S LEWIS ST ID1:T060590323
ANAHEIM CA ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 17
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083003827T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 2002-01-16 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-01-16 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:4 DIST/DIR:0.09 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:5
NAME:GESTETNER CORP REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1212 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981679194
ANAHEIM CA 92803 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 18
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
1212 E KAYELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92803
PHONE: 7143851911
OWNER NAME: HANOVER REAL ESTATE
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1212 E KATELLA AVE
ANEHEIM, CA 92803
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 09/26/1986
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: O-OTHER SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:4 DIST/DIR:0.09 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:5
NAME:GESTETNER CORP REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1212 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981679194
ANAHEIM CA 92803 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 19
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:35 DIST/DIR:0.10 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:6
NAME:ACTION RENTALS INC REV:01/01/94
ADDRESS:1822 LEWIS ID1:TISID-STATE7221
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:INACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 20
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names
& locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were
never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The
SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). That agency no longer
maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or
facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that
the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not
recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with
a CUPA.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
HWMANIFEST
SEARCH ID:63 DIST/DIR:0.10 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:6
NAME:C C MYERS INC REV:02/19/10
ADDRESS:1822 S LEWIS RD ID1:CAL000258530
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 21
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:5 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:7
NAME:GESTETNER CORP REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1290 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981678659
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 22
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
1290 E KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7143851911
OWNER NAME: HANOVER REAL ESTATE
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1290 E KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 09/26/1986
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:5 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:146 MAP ID:7
NAME:GESTETNER CORP REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1290 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981678659
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 23
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:7 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981981020
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 24
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
1016 E KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7146344551
OWNER NAME: W JAYCOX TRUST
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1016 E KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 04/06/1987
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:7 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981981020
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 25
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:8 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981386469
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:TRANSPORTER
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 26
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
1016 E KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 90805
PHONE: 7146344551
OWNER NAME: R RANGEL
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: P O BOX 4468
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 02/11/1986
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: N
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: O-OTHER SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: Y - YES TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:8 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD981386469
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:TRANSPORTER
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 27
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:30 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:PLATINUM TRIANGLE REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAL60001110
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:SCHOOL
ORANGE STATUS:INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 28
- Continued on next page -
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: School Investigation
Status: Inactive - Action Required
Status Date: 2009-10-23 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding: School District
Regulatory Agencies Involved: SMBRP
Lead Agency: SMBRP
Project Manager: CHRISTINE CHIU
Supervisor: Shahir Haddad
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres: 3.76
Assessor s Parcel Number: 083-751-01, 083-751-14, 083-751-15, 375-381-34, 375-381-35
Past Uses: ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, AGRICULTURAL - ORCHARD, UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE,
TRANSPORTATION - WAREHOUSING
Potential Contaminants: 30018 30022 30027 30484
Confirmed Contaminants: 30022 30484 30018 30027
Potential Media Affected: SOIL, SV
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site:
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
083-751-01
083-751-14
083-751-15
375-381-34
375-381-35
404830
60001110
COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo
Completion Date: 2009-10-23 00:00:00
Comments: On 10/23/2009, DTSC prepared & transmitted the project close out Cost Recovery Unit Memorandum.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Agreement Terminated Notification
Completion Date: 2009-08-17 00:00:00
Comments: On August 17, 2009, DTSC received a letter from the District, dated August 12, 2009, with notification that the District is terminating the Agreement
effective immediately. The letter also indicates, however, that a summary data report will be submitted to DTSC when ready.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Technical Workplan
Completion Date: 2009-07-03 00:00:00
Comments: Via email on 07/03/2009, DTSC noted that the site sampling plan appeared consistent with discussions with the District s consultant and provided
comments on the site sampling plan.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:30 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:PLATINUM TRIANGLE REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAL60001110
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:SCHOOL
ORANGE STATUS:INACTIVE - ACTION REQUIRED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 29
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Fieldwork
Completion Date: 2009-07-10 00:00:00
Comments: On July 10, 2009, fieldwork was completed per District s consultant.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Public Notice
Completion Date: 2009-07-07 00:00:00
Comments: Via email on July 7, 2009, DTSC received a final copy of the Field Work Notice and was informed that the Notice was posted at the 1010 and 1016 E.
Katella properties and delivered to properties within the line of sight of the proposed school property.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Technical Report
Completion Date: 2009-10-22 00:00:00
Comments: DTSC did not review the Environmental Assessment Summary Report since the District terminated the EOA (August 2009) prior to receipt of the
Report. The report summarized the soil and soil vapor sampling results from fieldwork conducted in July 2009. Maximum concentrations in soil gas include the
following: 0.15 ug/l of naphthalene; 580 ug/l of PCE; 20 ug/l of TCE. The risk evaluation estimated the cancer risk due to chlorinated compounds via the vapor
intrusion pathway as 1.5 x 10-5 and the total hazard index as 17. PCE is the primary contributor to risk and hazard.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement
Completion Date: 2009-06-10 00:00:00
Comments: Signed agreement sent (FedEx) to District.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:48 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:JAYCOX DISPOSAL REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1016 KATELLA ID1:T0605900867
ANAHEIM CA 92803 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 30
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001097T
LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 88UT183
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1990-02-27 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
HWMANIFEST
SEARCH ID:67 DIST/DIR:0.11 SE ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:8
NAME:TEST AMERICA DRILLING CORP REV:02/19/10
ADDRESS:1016 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAL000264848
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 31
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:53 DIST/DIR:0.11 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:9
NAME:TEXACO SERVICE STATION REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:818 E KATELLA AVE ID1:T0605900569
ANAHEIM CA 92801 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 32
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000719T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1998-08-19 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1998-08-19 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
HWMANIFEST
SEARCH ID:68 DIST/DIR:0.11 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:9
NAME:TEXACO DOWNSTREAM #211247 REV:02/19/10
ADDRESS:818 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAL000254200
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 33
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST INVENTORY (HWMI) SITE
INFORMATION FROM THE CA EPA AND DTSC HAZARDOUS WASTE TRACKING SYSTEM (HWTS) :
Date Record was Created: 6/20/2002 7:21:09 AM
Inactivity Date:
Facility Mail Name:
Facility Mailing Address: PO BOX 6004, SAN RAMON, CA 94583
Owner Name: CHEVRON ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT CO
Owner Address: PO BOX 6004, SAN RAMON, CA 94583
Contact Name: KATHY NORRIS - RM L2173
Contact Address: PO BOX 6004, SAN RAMON, CA 94583
Contact Phone: 9258425931
HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2005-2009:
2009 Method Type:
2009 Waste Type:
2009 Total Tonnage:
2008 Waste Type:
2008 Total Tonnage:
2007 Waste Type:
2007 Total Tonnage:
2006 Waste Type:
2006 Total Tonnage:
2005 Waste Type:
2005 Total Tonnage:
HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2000-2004:
2004 Waste Type:
2004 Total Tonnage:
2003 Waste Type:
2003 Total Tonnage:
2002 Waste Type:
2002 Total Tonnage:
2001 Waste Type:
2001 Total Tonnage:
2000 Waste Type:
2000 Total Tonnage:
HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 1993-1999:
1999 Waste Type:
1999 Total Tonnage:
1998 Waste Type:
1998 Total Tonnage:
1997 Waste Type:
1997 Total Tonnage:
1996 Waste Type:
1996 Total Tonnage:
1995 Waste Type:
1995 Total Tonnage:
1994 Waste Type:
1994 Total Tonnage:
1993 Waste Type:
1993 Total Tonnage:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:3 DIST/DIR:0.12 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:10
NAME:CLUTCH CO REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1832 S LEWIS ST ID1:CA0000435925
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 34
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: KENNETH MAKLOSKI
1832 S LEWIS
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7146348611
OWNER NAME: CLUTCH CO
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR_TYPE:
MAILING ADDRESS: 1832 S LEWIS
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 07/05/1994
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:3 DIST/DIR:0.12 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:10
NAME:CLUTCH CO REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1832 S LEWIS ST ID1:CA0000435925
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 35
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
HWMANIFEST
SEARCH ID:64 DIST/DIR:0.12 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:10
NAME:FASTEEL CORPORATION REV:02/19/10
ADDRESS:1832 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAL000324599
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 36
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:9 DIST/DIR:0.12 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:11
NAME:JOBBER MACHINE REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1836 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAD981980477
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 37
SITE INFORMATION
OWNER NAME:
OWNER TYPE:
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1838 S LEWIS
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
333319 - OTHER COMMERCIAL AND SERVICE INDUSTRY MACHINERY MANUFACTURING
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:36 DIST/DIR:0.12 NW ELEVATION:147 MAP ID:12
NAME:GEORGIA PACIFIC CORPORATION REV:01/01/94
ADDRESS:1700 S LEWIS ST ID1:TISID-STATE7219
ANAHEIM CA 92825 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:INACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 38
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names
& locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were
never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The
SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). That agency no longer
maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or
facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that
the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not
recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with
a CUPA.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
HWMANIFEST
SEARCH ID:66 DIST/DIR:0.12 NW ELEVATION:147 MAP ID:12
NAME:OMMI DUCT SYSTEMS REV:02/19/10
ADDRESS:1700 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAL000212088
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 39
THE CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST INVENTORY (HWMI) SITE
INFORMATION FROM THE CA EPA AND DTSC HAZARDOUS WASTE TRACKING SYSTEM (HWTS) :
Date Record was Created: 1/14/2000
Inactivity Date:
Facility Mail Name:
Facility Mailing Address: 1700 S LEWIS ST, ANAHEIM, CA 92805-6438
Owner Name: ROBERT BRUMLEU
Owner Address: 1700 S LEWIS ST, ANAHEIM, CA 92805-6438
Contact Name: CHRISTOPHER W SHORT/GEN MNGR
Contact Address: 1700 S LEWIS ST, ANAHEIM, CA 92805-6438
Contact Phone: 7143858900
HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2005-2009:
2009 Method Type: STORAGE, BULKING, AND/OR TRANSFER OFF SITE--NO TREATMENT/REOVERY (H010-H129) OR (H131-H135)
2009 Waste Type: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent
2009 Total Tonnage: 0.336
2008 Waste Type: Waste oil and mixed oil
2008 Total Tonnage: 0.9
2007 Waste Type:
2007 Total Tonnage:
2006 Waste Type:
2006 Total Tonnage:
2005 Waste Type:
2005 Total Tonnage:
HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 2000-2004:
2004 Waste Type:
2004 Total Tonnage:
2003 Waste Type:
2003 Total Tonnage:
2002 Waste Type:
2002 Total Tonnage:
2001 Waste Type: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent
2001 Total Tonnage: 0.3
2000 Waste Type: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent
2000 Total Tonnage: 0.27
HWMI WASTE TYPE AND TONNAGE INFORMATION BY YEAR 1993-1999:
1999 Waste Type:
1999 Total Tonnage:
1998 Waste Type:
1998 Total Tonnage:
1997 Waste Type:
1997 Total Tonnage:
1996 Waste Type:
1996 Total Tonnage:
1995 Waste Type:
1995 Total Tonnage:
1994 Waste Type:
1994 Total Tonnage:
1993 Waste Type:
1993 Total Tonnage:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
HWMANIFEST
SEARCH ID:65 DIST/DIR:0.12 SW ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:13
NAME:L & B CONNECTING ROD REV:02/19/10
ADDRESS:1830 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAL000257128
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 40
DETAILS NOT AVAILABLE
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:14 DIST/DIR:0.16 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:14
NAME:NATIONAL CRANKSHAFT CO REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1848 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAD982496390
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 41
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGER
1848 S LEWIS ST
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7146343803
OWNER NAME: WHEELER RICHARD
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1848 S LEWIS ST
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 04/30/1990
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:14 DIST/DIR:0.16 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:14
NAME:NATIONAL CRANKSHAFT CO REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1848 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAD982496390
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 42
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:11 DIST/DIR:0.19 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:15
NAME:LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS LLC REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:700 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAR000016774
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 43
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: WILLIAM SPRINGER
2429 S PECK RD
WHITTIER CA 90601
PHONE: 5626950511
OWNER NAME: JAMES A BARKER
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR_TYPE:
MAILING ADDRESS: 2429 S PECK RD
WHITTIER, CA 90601
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 11/30/1998
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:11 DIST/DIR:0.19 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:15
NAME:LOS ANGELES TRUCK CENTERS LLC REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:700 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAR000016774
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 44
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
VIOLATION INFORMATION:
HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION:
D001 - IGNITABLE WASTE
D007 - CHROMIUM
D008 - LEAD
F003 - THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER,
METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/ BLENDS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT NON- HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS
CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY
VOLUME) OF ONE OR MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF
THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:62 DIST/DIR:0.19 SW ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:15
NAME:WESTSIDE MATERIALS REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:700 E KATELLA AVE ID1:T0605900518
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 45
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000648T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1991-02-08 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1987-09-28 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): * Historical Enforcement
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 1988-02-02 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Unauthorized Release Form
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:17 DIST/DIR:0.19 NW ELEVATION:147 MAP ID:16
NAME:ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ANAHEIM PRINTING REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1701 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAD982438715
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 46
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: JOSE CASTILLO
1701 S LEWIS ST
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7149379330
OWNER NAME: ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER THE
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1701 S LEWIS ST
ANAHEIM, CA 928
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 03/04/1991
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:17 DIST/DIR:0.19 NW ELEVATION:147 MAP ID:16
NAME:ORANGE COUNTY REGISTER ANAHEIM PRINTING REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1701 S LEWIS ST ID1:CAD982438715
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 47
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:6 DIST/DIR:0.20 NE ELEVATION:150 MAP ID:17
NAME:GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1140 E HOWELL AVE ID1:CAR000065656
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 48
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: MARK CASALE
1140 E HOWELL AVE
ANAHEIM CA 928056452
PHONE: 7147725711
OWNER NAME: GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR_TYPE:
MAILING ADDRESS: 1140 E HOWELL AVE
ANAHEIM, CA 928056452
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 02/08/2000
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:6 DIST/DIR:0.20 NE ELEVATION:150 MAP ID:17
NAME:GOLDEN COAST SPORTSWEAR INC REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1140 E HOWELL AVE ID1:CAR000065656
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 49
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
VIOLATION INFORMATION:
HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:12 DIST/DIR:0.20 SE ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:18
NAME:MALCO SERVICES REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1865 S SANTA CRUZ ID1:CAR000053223
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 50
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: MIKE STENNER
1865 SO SANTA CRUZ
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7146341060
OWNER NAME: BUDDY MALONE
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR_TYPE:
MAILING ADDRESS: 1865 SO SANTA CRUZ
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 06/10/1999
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:12 DIST/DIR:0.20 SE ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:18
NAME:MALCO SERVICES REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1865 S SANTA CRUZ ID1:CAR000053223
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 51
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
VIOLATION INFORMATION:
HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:16 DIST/DIR:0.20 SE ELEVATION:147 MAP ID:19
NAME:ORANGE COUNTY MICROFILM INC REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1456 E KATELLA ID1:CAD982509358
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 52
SITE INFORMATION
OWNER NAME: LYKINS BOB
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1456 E KATELLA
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 09/01/1996
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:20 DIST/DIR:0.20 SW ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:20
NAME:PACIFIC IMAGE REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1:CA0000047258
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:LGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 53
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: ALEX GODINEZ
SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT A
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7149786691 N/A
OWNER NAME: PACFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: PACFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ,
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 06/03/2010
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: LQG - LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS: GENERATES MORE THAN 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
325188 - ALL OTHER BASIC INORGANIC CHEMICAL MANUFACTURING
334412 - BARE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:20 DIST/DIR:0.20 SW ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:20
NAME:PACIFIC IMAGE REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1:CA0000047258
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:LGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 54
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
AGENCY: EPA DATE: 05/09/2005
TYPE:
VIOLATION INFORMATION:
VIOLATION NUMBER: 1 RESPONSIBLE: E - EPA
DETERMINED: 05/20/2005 DETERMINED BY: E - EPA
CITATION: RESOLVED: 05/20/2005
TYPE: GENERATORS - GENERAL
VIOLATION NUMBER: 6001 RESPONSIBLE: S - STATE
DETERMINED: 10/30/2010 DETERMINED BY: S - STATE
CITATION: RESOLVED: 10/30/2010
TYPE: GENERATORS - GENERAL
HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION:
792
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:21 DIST/DIR:0.20 SW ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:20
NAME:PACIFIC IMAGE, INC REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1:CAO000047258
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:LGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 55
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
OWNER NAME: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 02/27/2008
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: LQG - LARGE QUANTITY GENERATORS: GENERATES MORE THAN 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
334412 - BARE PRINTED CIRCUIT BOARD MANUFACTURING
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
VIOLATION INFORMATION:
HAZARDOUS WASTE INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:21 DIST/DIR:0.20 SW ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:20
NAME:PACIFIC IMAGE, INC REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1875 S SANTA CRUZ AVE ID1:CAO000047258
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:LGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 56
792
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:2 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:21
NAME:AIRPORT COACH REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:917 E GENE AUTRY WAY ID1:CAD983657537
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 57
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: PAUL WIGGINS
917 E GENE AUTRY WY
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7149388900
OWNER NAME: AIRPORT COACH
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR_TYPE:
MAILING ADDRESS: 917 E GENE AUTRY WY
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 01/25/1993
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:2 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:21
NAME:AIRPORT COACH REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:917 E GENE AUTRY WAY ID1:CAD983657537
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 58
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:22 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:21
NAME:RYDER STUDENT TRANS REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:917 PACIFICO AVE ID1:CAD982048316
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 59
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: MIKE LUKE
917 E PACIFICO
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7146342313
OWNER NAME: RYDER STUDENT TRANS
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 917 E PACIFICO
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 07/18/1991
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:22 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:21
NAME:RYDER STUDENT TRANS REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:917 PACIFICO AVE ID1:CAD982048316
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 60
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:37 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:21
NAME:RYDER STUDENT TRANS CO REV:01/01/94
ADDRESS:917 PACIFICO AVE ID1:TISID-STATE34120
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 61
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names
& locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were
never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The
SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). That agency no longer
maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or
facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that
the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not
recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with
a CUPA.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:51 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:21
NAME:RYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:917 E GENE AUTRY WAY ID1:T0605901626
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 62
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002204T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1996-10-24 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-10-24 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Summary
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-10-24 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:10 DIST/DIR:0.21 SE ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:22
NAME:LIFE FLEET REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1890 S BETMOR LN ID1:CA0000133082
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 63
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: BRAD JONES
1890 S BETMOR LN
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7149398101
OWNER NAME: LIFE FLEET
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR:
OPERATOR_TYPE:
MAILING ADDRESS: 1890 S BETMOR LN
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 02/11/1994
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: P-PRIVATE SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:10 DIST/DIR:0.21 SE ELEVATION:144 MAP ID:22
NAME:LIFE FLEET REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1890 S BETMOR LN ID1:CA0000133082
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 64
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:15 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:23
NAME:ORANGE COUNTY AUTO REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:620 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD983588161
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 65
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: CRISPINO RICH
620 E KATELLA
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7145205551
OWNER NAME: ORANGE COUNTY AUTO
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 620 E KATELLA
ANAHEIM, CA 92805
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 07/05/1991
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:15 DIST/DIR:0.21 SW ELEVATION:145 MAP ID:23
NAME:ORANGE COUNTY AUTO REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:620 E KATELLA AVE ID1:CAD983588161
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 66
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:13 DIST/DIR:0.22 SE ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:24
NAME:MER CEDES SHOP THE REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1884 S SANTA CRUZ ID1:CAD983588153
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 67
- Continued on next page -
SITE INFORMATION
CONTACT INFORMATION: PRESTON GREG
1884 S SANTA CRUZ STE B
ANAHEIM CA 92805
PHONE: 7149789889
OWNER NAME: ON THE BALL TYPESETTING
OWNER TYPE: P-PRIVATE
OPERATOR: NOT REQUIRED
OPERATOR_TYPE: P-PRIVATE
MAILING ADDRESS: 1884 S SANTA CRUZ STE B
ANAHEIM, C
UNIVERSE INFORMATION:
RECEIVED DATE: 07/05/1991
SUBJECT TO CORRECTIVE ACTION (SUBJCA)
SUBJCA: N - NO
SUBJCA TSD 3004: N - NO
SUBJCA NON TSD: N - NO
SIGNIFICANT NON-COMPLIANCE(SNC): N - NO
BEGINNING OF THE YEAR SNC:
PERMIT WORKLOAD: -----
CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
POST CLOSURE WORKLOAD: -----
PERMITTING /CLOSURE/POST-CLOSURE PROGRESS: -----
CORRECTIVE ACTION WORKLOAD: N - NO
GENERATOR STATUS: SQG - SMALL QUANTITY GENERATOR: GENERATES 100 - 1000 KG/MONTH OF HAZARDOUS WASTE
INSTITUTIONAL CONTROL: N-NO ENGINEERING CONTROL: N
HUMAN EXPOSURE: N-NO GW CONTROLS: N- NO
LAND TYPE: O-OTHER SHORT TERM GEN: N
TRANS FACILITY: N REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N
IMPORTER ACTIVITY: N - NO MIXED WASTE GEN: N - NO
TRANS ACTIVITY: N - NO TSD ACTIVITY: N - NO
RECYCLER ACTIVITY: N - NO ONSITE BURNER EXEMPT: N - NO
FURNACE EXEMPTION: N - NO UNDER INJECT ACTIVITY: N - NO
REC WASTE FROM OFF SITE: N - NO UNIV WASTE DEST FAC: N
USED OIL TRANS: N - NO USED OIL PROCESSOR: N - NO
USED OIL REFINER: N - NO USED OIL FUEL BURNER: N - NO
UO FUEL MARKETER TO BURNER: N USED OIL SPEC MARKETER: N - NO
NAIC INFORMATION
811111 - GENERAL AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
RCRAGN
SEARCH ID:13 DIST/DIR:0.22 SE ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:24
NAME:MER CEDES SHOP THE REV:11/9/11
ADDRESS:1884 S SANTA CRUZ ID1:CAD983588153
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:SGN
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:EPA
Site Details Page - 68
ENFORCEMENT INFORMATION:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:38 DIST/DIR:0.22 SE ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:25
NAME:SCOTTS INDEPENDENT REV:03/05/2001
ADDRESS:1885 S SANTA CRUZ ID1:ANAHIEMNA5
ANAHEIM CA ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 69
ANAHEIM CERTIFIED & NON COMPLIANT TANKS LIST INFORMATION
According to the Anaheim Fire Dept. the following information is current as of 03/17/03
Certified Petroleum Tanks:
Non Petroleum Tanks:
Waste Tanks: 1
Non Petroleum Tank Contents: WASTE OIL
Comments:
Certificate Number: NA5
Date Certificate Issued:
Number of Tags Issued:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
UST
SEARCH ID:39 DIST/DIR:0.22 SE ELEVATION:143 MAP ID:25
NAME:SCOTTS INDEPENDENT PORSCHE REV:01/01/94
ADDRESS:1885 SANTA CRUZ ID1:TISID-STATE34184
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:
Site Details Page - 70
UST HISTORICAL DATA
This site was listed in the FIDS Zip Code List as a UST site. The Office of Hazardous Data Management produced the FIDS list. The FIDS list is an index of names
& locations of sites recorded in various California State environmental agency databases. It is sorted by zip code and as an index, details regarding the sites were
never included.
The UST information included in FIDS as provided by the Office of Hazardous Data Management was originally collected from the SWEEPS database. The
SWEEPS database recorded Underground Storage Tanks and was maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). That agency no longer
maintains the SWEEPS database and last updated it in 1994. The last release of that 1994 database was in 1997.
Oversight of Underground Storage Tanks within California is now conducted by Certified Unified Program Agencies referred to as CUPA s. There are
approximately 102 CUPA s and Local Oversight Programs (LOP s) in the State of California. Most are city or county government agencies. As of 1998, all sites or
facilities with underground storage tanks were required by Federal mandate to obtain certification by designated UST oversight agencies (in this case, CUPA s) that
the UST/s at their location were upgraded or removed in adherence with the 1998 RCRA standards.
Information from the FIDS/SWEEPS lists were included in this report search to help identify where underground storage tanks may have existed that were not
recorded in CUPA databases or lists collected by us. This may occur if a tank was removed prior to development of recent CUPA UST lists or never registered with
a CUPA.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:49 DIST/DIR:0.26 SW ELEVATION:142 MAP ID:26
NAME:JOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1858 ANAHEIM WAY ID1:T0605901679
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 71
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002305T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1995-02-02 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1995-02-02 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1995-02-02 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:59 DIST/DIR:0.27 NE ELEVATION:150 MAP ID:27
NAME:WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1111 HOWELL AVENUE E.ID1:T0605974729
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 72
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083004016T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 2005-09-08 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-09-08 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:61 DIST/DIR:0.27 NE ELEVATION:150 MAP ID:27
NAME:WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIALS REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1111 HOWELL AVE ID1:T0605901991
ANAHEIM CA 92802 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 73
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083002912T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1996-12-19 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-12-19 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1996-12-19 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:60 DIST/DIR:0.29 NE ELEVATION:150 MAP ID:28
NAME:WESTSIDE BUILDING MATERIAL REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1213 HOWELL AVENUE E.ID1:T0605906599
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 74
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083004017T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 2005-08-01 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-08-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Excavate and Dispose
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:45 DIST/DIR:0.31 NW ELEVATION:149 MAP ID:29
NAME:COORS DISRIBUTING COMPANY REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1625 S LEWIS ST ID1:T060599039
ANAHEIM CA 92802 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 75
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083003867T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline, Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 2002-08-05 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported): There was a case opened in 2000 for a waste oil tank andthat case was closed in 2001. A second case was opened in 2002
and later closed A third issue related to VOCs was closed by the Regional Board in 2003.
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-08-05 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:46 DIST/DIR:0.32 SW ELEVATION:140 MAP ID:30
NAME:DANA EDWARDS REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1901 S MANCHESTER AVE ID1:T0605900745
ANAHEIM CA 92802 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 76
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000936T
LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 86UT077
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Stoddard solvent / Mineral Spriits / Distillates
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1986-07-11 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:50 DIST/DIR:0.37 NE ELEVATION:155 MAP ID:31
NAME:NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC.REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1500 E BABBITT AVE ID1:T0605900234
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 77
- Continued on next page -
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000298T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline, Diesel
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Aquifer used for drinking water supply
STATUS: Open - Site Assessment
STATUS DATE: 2002-12-05 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-12-27 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-05-15 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2010-10-07 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Verbal Enforcement
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-01-23 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-11-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Meeting
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2004-04-26 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-12-22 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Verbal Enforcement
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-01-28 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-06-10 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Site Visit / Inspection / Sampling
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-08-29 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): * No Action
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-02-29 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Staff Letter
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:50 DIST/DIR:0.37 NE ELEVATION:155 MAP ID:31
NAME:NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC.REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1500 E BABBITT AVE ID1:T0605900234
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 78
- Continued on next page -
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Vacuum Extract
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Pump and Treat Groundwater
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): REMEDIATION
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Remove free product
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-07-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-01-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2009-04-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-09-05 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Verbal Communication
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-04-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-01-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-01-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Soil and Water Investigation Report
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-07-31 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Soil and Water Investigation Report
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2011-03-07 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Clean Up Fund - 5-Year Review Summary
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2006-07-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-04-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:50 DIST/DIR:0.37 NE ELEVATION:155 MAP ID:31
NAME:NORCO DELIVERY SERVICE, INC.REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1500 E BABBITT AVE ID1:T0605900234
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:OPEN - SITE ASSESSMENT
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 79
- More Details Exist For This Site; Max Page Limit Reached -
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2002-01-31 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Soil and Water Investigation Workplan
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-07-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-02-05 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2007-01-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-10-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-10-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-07-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2008-04-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2010-01-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Semi-Annually
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-04-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-01-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2004-02-28 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2005-07-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2003-05-15 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): RESPONSE
DATE (blank if not reported): 2004-04-30 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Monitoring Report - Quarterly
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:43 DIST/DIR:0.39 SE ELEVATION:149 MAP ID:32
NAME:ARCO #6220 REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD ID1:T0605900941
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 80
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001205T
LOCAL AGENCY: ANAHEIM, CITY OF
LOCAL CASE NUMBER:
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1994-10-19 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1994-10-09 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): ENFORCEMENT
DATE (blank if not reported): 1994-10-19 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Closure/No Further Action Letter
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Stopped
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:47 DIST/DIR:0.45 NE ELEVATION:156 MAP ID:33
NAME:DEL PISO BRICK COMPANY REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1635 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD ID1:T0605900097
ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 81
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083000125T
LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 90UT080
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Gasoline
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1990-08-08 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:44 DIST/DIR:0.46 NE ELEVATION:156 MAP ID:34
NAME:CERTRON REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:1701 STATE COLLEGE ID1:T0605900725
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 82
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER:
LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 85UT095
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum Hydrocarbon
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Under Investigation
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1986-04-03 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:55 DIST/DIR:0.46 NW ELEVATION:153 MAP ID:35
NAME:TOSCO CORPORATION SITE REV:01/12/06
ADDRESS:1515 LEWIS ID1:T0605999297
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:LEAK BEING CONFIRMED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 83
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: LOCAL AGENCY
REGIONAL BOARD: 08
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 083003795T
RESPONSIBLE PARTY:
ADDRESS OF RESPONSIBLE PARTY:
SITE OPERATOR:
WATER SYSTEM:
CASE NUMBER: 083003795T
CASE TYPE: UNDEFINED
SUBSTANCE LEAKED: DIESEL
SUBSTANCE QUANTITY:
LEAK CAUSE: OTHER CAUSE
LEAK SOURCE: OTHER
HOW LEAK WAS DISCOVERED: NO DESCRIPTION
DATE DISCOVERED (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00
HOW LEAK WAS STOPPED:
STOP DATE (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00
STATUS: LEAK BEING CONFIRMED
ABATEMENT METHOD (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency):
ENFORCEMENT TYPE (please note that not all code translations have been provided by the reporting agency):
DATE OF ENFORCEMENT (blank if not reported):
ENTER DATE (blank if not reported):
REVIEW DATE (blank if not reported):
DATE OF LEAK CONFIRMATION (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported):
DATE PRELIMINARY SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE POLLUTION CHARACTERIZATION PLAN BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIATION PLAN WAS SUBMITTED (blank if not reported):
DATE REMEDIAL ACTION UNDERWAY (blank if not reported):
DATE POST REMEDIAL ACTION MONITORING BEGAN (blank if not reported):
DATE CLOSURE LETTER ISSUED (SITE CLOSED) (blank if not reported):
REPORT DATE (blank if not reported): 2001-04-24 00:00:00
MTBE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
MTBE DATE(Date of historical maximum MTBE concentration):
MTBE GROUNDWATER CONCENTRATION (parts per billion):
MTBE SOIL CONCENTRATION (parts per million):
MTBE CNTS: 0
MTBE FUEL: 0
MTBE TESTED: NOT REQUIRED TO BE TESTED
MTBE CLASS: *
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
LUST
SEARCH ID:57 DIST/DIR:0.48 SE ELEVATION:152 MAP ID:36
NAME:UNOCAL REV:01/10/12
ADDRESS:2001 KATELLA ID1:T0605900918
ANAHEIM CA 92801 ID2:
ORANGE STATUS:COMPLETED - CASE CLOSED
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA SWRCB
Site Details Page - 84
RELEASE DATA FROM THE CALIFORNIA STATE WATER RESOURCES CONTROL BOARD LUSTIS DATABASE
Please note that some data previously provided by the State Water Resources Control Board in the LUSTIS database is not currently being provided by the agency
in the most recent edition. Incidents that occurred after the year 2000 may not have much information. Field headers with blank information following after should
be interpreted as unreported by the agency.
LEAD AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
REGIONAL BOARD CASE NUMBER: 083001162T
LOCAL AGENCY: ORANGE COUNTY LOP
LOCAL CASE NUMBER: 89UT040
CASE TYPE: LUST Cleanup Site
POTENTIAL CONTAMINANTS OF CONCERN: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating
POTENTIAL MEDIA AFFECTED: Soil
STATUS: Completed - Case Closed
STATUS DATE: 1990-08-28 00:00:00
SITE HISTORY (blank if not reported):
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Reported
ACTION TYPE (blank if not reported): Other
DATE (blank if not reported): 1950-01-01 00:00:00
ACTION (blank if not reported): Leak Discovery
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:32 DIST/DIR:0.60 NW ELEVATION:151 MAP ID:37
NAME:SILGAN PLASTICS CORPORATION REV:03/14/11
ADDRESS:611 E CERRITOS AVE ID1:CAL30300130
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:EVALUATION
ORANGE STATUS:REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 85
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: Evaluation
Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency
Status Date: 2001-03-02 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding: Not Applicable
Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED
Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED
Project Manager:
Supervisor: Referred - Not Assigned
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres:
Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED
Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site:
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
30300130
COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: SB 1248 Notification
Completion Date: 2001-02-20 00:00:00
Comments: SB 1248 Orange County
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:27 DIST/DIR:0.67 NE ELEVATION:156 MAP ID:38
NAME:ITASCO REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:2211 E HOWELL AVE ID1:CAL30280129
ANAHEIM CA 92804 ID2:HISTORICAL
ORANGE STATUS:REFER: RWQCB
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 86
- Continued on next page -
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: Historical
Status: Refer: RWQCB
Status Date: 1993-12-16 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding:
Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED
Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED
Project Manager:
Supervisor: Referred - Not Assigned
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres:
Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED
Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contaminants: OTHER ORGANIC SOLIDS, OXYGENATED SOLVENTS, ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS, Polychlorinated biphenyls
(PCBs)
Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site: * CERC2
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
MICHAEL-RAND PLATING
CAD982359879
30280129
COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: * Discovery
Completion Date: 1981-05-28 00:00:00
Comments: Facility identified via tip from Orange County Sanitary District - firm acid rinse goes into manhole.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: *Site Inspection (SI) Report
Completion Date: 1989-09-26 00:00:00
Comments: Site Inspection Done: EPA recommends Listing Site Inspec- tion; DHS recommends hazard ranking. Reasons for recommend- ation of further work at
the site: Soil samples collected during cleanup in 1983 were either surface samples or samp- les collected at a maximum if 8 ft. depth. No sampling was done
below the 8 feet that was excavated and backfilled with clean soil. It is not reasonable to believe that 1200ppm of TCE would remain within 8 feet of the surface in
an unlined sump.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report
Completion Date: 1988-01-08 00:00:00
Comments: Preliminary Assessment Done: Twenty yards, three of waste, removed to BKK (04/15/83). Samples (05/11/83) show solvent contamination. Site
excavated to depth of eight feet; 409 tons of soil removed to BKK. Soil sample levels (11/04/83) below TTLC and TLC.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Screening
Completion Date: 1987-05-06 00:00:00
Comments: Site Screening Done: CERCLA grant Preliminary Assessment required.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:27 DIST/DIR:0.67 NE ELEVATION:156 MAP ID:38
NAME:ITASCO REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:2211 E HOWELL AVE ID1:CAL30280129
ANAHEIM CA 92804 ID2:HISTORICAL
ORANGE STATUS:REFER: RWQCB
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 87
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Removal Action Completion Report
Completion Date: 1983-11-08 00:00:00
Comments: RA Soil. Site has been hazard mitigated. Clean-up complete. 294 tons of contaminated soil was removed.
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:31 DIST/DIR:0.79 SW ELEVATION:132 MAP ID:39
NAME:PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE/WILKEN WAY ID1:CAL30880003
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:SCHOOL
ORANGE STATUS:NO FURTHER ACTION
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 88
- Continued on next page -
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: School Investigation
Status: No Further Action
Status Date: 2003-08-07 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding: School District
Regulatory Agencies Involved: DTSC
Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED
Project Manager:
Supervisor: Shahir Haddad
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres: 14.06
Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED
Past Uses: RESIDENTIAL AREA
Potential Contaminants: 30018
Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: SOIL
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site:
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT
ANAHEIM CITY SD-PROPOSED PONDEROSA ELEM
PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (PROPOSED)
404300
30880003
COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment Report
Completion Date: 2003-08-07 00:00:00
Comments: DTSC approve PEA with a No Further Action determination
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: * Workplan
Completion Date: 2002-07-18 00:00:00
Comments:
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)
Completion Date: 2003-01-13 00:00:00
Comments:
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:31 DIST/DIR:0.79 SW ELEVATION:132 MAP ID:39
NAME:PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE/WILKEN WAY ID1:CAL30880003
ANAHEIM CA 92805 ID2:SCHOOL
ORANGE STATUS:NO FURTHER ACTION
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 89
Completion Date: 2002-01-29 00:00:00
Comments:
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Cost Recovery Closeout Memo
Completion Date: 2003-08-11 00:00:00
Comments:
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Environmental Oversight Agreement
Completion Date: 2002-01-15 00:00:00
Comments:
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:28 DIST/DIR:0.83 NE ELEVATION:163 MAP ID:40
NAME:NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:2201 E CERRITOS AVE ID1:CAL30280120
ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2:EVALUATION
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 90
- Continued on next page -
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: Evaluation
Status: Active
Status Date: 2008-07-01 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding:
Regulatory Agencies Involved: RWQCB 8 - Santa Ana
Lead Agency: RWQCB 8 - Santa Ana
Project Manager: EILEEN MANANIAN
Supervisor: Emad Yemut
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres: 18.6
Assessor s Parcel Number: 083-210-31
Past Uses: MANUFACTURING - CHEMICALS
Potential Contaminants: * HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * HYDROCARBON SOLVENTS * ORGANIC
LIQUIDS WITH METALS * ORGANIC SOLIDS WITH HALOGENS * OTHER ORGANIC SOLIDS * CONTAMINATED SOIL * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH
WITH METALS * TANK BOTTOM WASTES * UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE * OTHER PESTICIDE CONTAINERS, 30 GALLONS OR
MORE * TETRAETHYL LEAD SLUDGE
Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NMA
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site: EPA - PASI
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
083-210-31
CAD008364150
SL0605956547
30280120
COMPLETED ACTIVITIES AND DTSC COMMENTS REGARDING THIS SITE (blank below = not reported by agency)
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: PA/SI Reassessment
Completion Date: 2009-02-09 00:00:00
Comments: Reassessment completed by DTSC and approved by EPA
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: *Site Inspection (SI) Report
Completion Date: 1989-05-10 00:00:00
Comments: SITE INSP DONE SANTA ANA RWQCB IS CURRENTLY ADDRESSING CONTAMINATION ISSUES, THEREFORE, DHS STATUS IS
PENDING.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Preliminary Assessment Report
Completion Date: 1988-06-27 00:00:00
Comments: PRELIM ASSESS DONE PENDING STATUS BASED ON OUTCOME OF SITE INSPECTION.
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Screening
Completion Date: 1987-05-29 00:00:00
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:28 DIST/DIR:0.83 NE ELEVATION:163 MAP ID:40
NAME:NEVILLE CHEMICAL COMPANY REV:07/14/11
ADDRESS:2201 E CERRITOS AVE ID1:CAL30280120
ANAHEIM CA 92806 ID2:EVALUATION
ORANGE STATUS:ACTIVE
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 91
Comments: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDED
Area Name: PROJECT WIDE
Sub- Area Name:
Document Type: Site Screening
Completion Date: 2006-04-12 00:00:00
Comments: Site Screening Completed
Environmental FirstSearch
Site Detail Report
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
STATE
SEARCH ID:33 DIST/DIR:1.00 SE ELEVATION:132 MAP ID:41
NAME:THE CITY PLACE NORTH REV:03/14/11
ADDRESS:3745 W CHAPMAN AVE ID1:CAL30000017
ORANGE CA 92868 ID2:EVALUATION
ORANGE STATUS:REFER: 1248 LOCAL AGENCY
CONTACT: PHONE:
SOURCE:CA DTSC
Site Details Page - 92
GENERAL SITE INFORMATION
Site Type: Evaluation
Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency
Status Date: 2000-12-05 00:00:00
NPL Site: NO
Funding: Not Applicable
Regulatory Agencies Involved: NONE SPECIFIED
Lead Agency: NONE SPECIFIED
Project Manager:
Supervisor: Referred - Not Assigned
Branch: Cleanup Cypress
Acres:
Assessor s Parcel Number: NONE SPECIFIED
Past Uses: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Confirmed Contaminants: NONE SPECIFIED
Potential Media Affected: NONE SPECIFIED
Restricted Use: NO
Site Management Required: NONE SPECIFIED
Special Programs Associated with this Site:
OTHER SITE NAMES (blank below = not reported by agency)
30000017
Environmental FirstSearch Descriptions
NPL: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST - The National Priorities List is a list of the worst hazardous waste sites that
have been identified by Superfund. Sites are only put on the list after they have been scored using the Hazard Ranking
System (HRS), and have been subjected to public comment. Any site on the NPL is eligible for cleanup using Superfund
Trust money. A Superfund site is any land in the United States that has been contaminated by hazardous waste and
identified by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a candidate for cleanup because it poses a risk to human
health and/or the environment.FINAL - Currently on the Final NPLPROPOSED - Proposed for NPL
NPL DELISTED: EPA NATIONAL PRIORITY LIST Subset - Database of delisted NPL sites. The National Oil and
Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the
NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is
appropriate.DELISTED - Deleted from the Final NPL
CERCLIS: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
INFORMATION SYSTEM (CERCLIS)- CERCLIS is a database of potential and confirmed hazardous waste sites at
which the EPA Superfund program has some involvement. It contains sites that are either proposed to be or are on the
National Priorities List (NPL) as well as sites that are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the
NPL.PART OF NPL- Site is part of NPL siteDELETED - Deleted from the Final NPLFINAL - Currently on the Final
NPLNOT PROPOSED - Not on the NPLNOT VALID - Not Valid Site or IncidentPROPOSED - Proposed for
NPLREMOVED - Removed from Proposed NPLSCAN PLAN - Pre-proposal SiteWITHDRAWN - Withdrawn
NFRAP: EPA COMPREHENSIVE ENVIRONMENTAL RESPONSE COMPENSATION AND LIABILITY
INFORMATION SYSTEM ARCHIVED SITES - database of Archive designated CERCLA sites that, to the best of
EPA's knowledge, assessment has been completed and has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the
National Priorities List (NPL). This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site;
it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site.NFRAP – No
Further Remedial Action PlanP - Site is part of NPL siteD - Deleted from the Final NPLF - Currently on the Final NPLN -
Not on the NPLO - Not Valid Site or IncidentP - Proposed for NPLR - Removed from Proposed NPLS - Pre-proposal
SiteW – Withdrawn
RCRA COR ACT: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES -
Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information
(RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all
generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their
activities to state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA
offices. This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the
Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.RCRAInfo facilities that have reported violations and subject to
corrective actions.
RCRA TSD: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM TREATMENT,
STORAGE, and DISPOSAL FACILITIES. - Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about
hazardous waste handlers. In general, all generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are
required to provide information about their activities to state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the
information to regional and national EPA offices. This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery
Act (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.Facilities that treat, store, dispose, or
incinerate hazardous waste.
RCRA GEN: EPA/MA DEP/CT DEP RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM
GENERATORS - Database of hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act
Information (RCRAInfo), a national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In
general, all generators, transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information
about their activities to state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and
national EPA offices. This regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended
by the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments of 1984.Facilities that generate or transport hazardous waste or meet
other RCRA requirements.LGN - Large Quantity GeneratorsSGN - Small Quantity GeneratorsVGN – Conditionally
Exempt Generator.Included are RAATS (RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System) and CMEL (Compliance
Monitoring & Enforcement List) facilities. CONNECTICUT HAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFEST – Database of all
shipments of hazardous waste within, into or from Connecticut. The data includes date of shipment, transporter and TSD
info, and material shipped and quantity. This data is appended to the details of existing generator records.
MASSACHUSETTES HAZARDOUS WASTE GENERATOR – database of generators that are regulated under the MA
DEP. VQN-MA = generates less than 220 pounds or 27 gallons per month of hazardous waste or waste oil.SQN-MA =
generates 220 to 2,200 pounds or 27 to 270 gallons per month of waste oil.LQG-MA = generates greater than 2,200 lbs of
hazardous waste or waste oil per month.
RCRA NLR: EPA RESOURCE CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES - Database of
hazardous waste information contained in the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Information (RCRAInfo), a
national program management and inventory system about hazardous waste handlers. In general, all generators,
transporters, treaters, storers, and disposers of hazardous waste are required to provide information about their activities to
state environmental agencies. These agencies, in turn pass on the information to regional and national EPA offices. This
regulation is governed by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA), as amended by the Hazardous and Solid
Waste Amendments of 1984.not currently classified by the EPA but are still included in the RCRAInfo database. Reasons
for non classification: Failure to report in a timely matter. No longer in business. No longer in business at the listed
address. No longer generating hazardous waste materials in quantities which require reporting.
Fed Brownfield: EPA BROWNFIELD MANAGEMENT SYSTEM (BMS) - database designed to assist EPA in
collecting, tracking, and updating information, as well as reporting on the major activities and accomplishments of the
various Brownfield grant Programs./n CLEANUPS IN MY COMMUNITY (subset) - Sites, facilities and properties that
have been contaminated by hazardous materials and are being, or have been, cleaned up under EPA's brownfield’s
program.
ERNS: EPA/NRC EMERGENCY RESPONSE NOTIFICATION SYSTEM (ERNS) - Database of incidents reported to
the National Response Center. These incidents include chemical spills, accidents involving chemicals (such as fires or
explosions), oil spills, transportation accidents that involve oil or chemicals, releases of radioactive materials, sightings of
oil sheens on bodies of water, terrorist incidents involving chemicals, incidents where illegally dumped chemicals have
been found, and drills intended to prepare responders to handle these kinds of incidents. Data since January 2001 has been
received from the National Response System database as the EPA no longer maintains this data.
Tribal Lands: DOI/BIA INDIAN LANDS OF THE UNITED STATES - Database of areas with boundaries established by
treaty, statute, and (or) executive or court order, recognized by the Federal Government as territory in which American
Indian tribes have primary governmental authority. The Indian Lands of the United States map layer shows areas of 640
acres or more, administered by the Bureau of Indian Affairs. Included are Federally-administered lands within a
reservation which may or may not be considered part of the reservation.BUREAU OF INDIAN AFFIARS CONTACT -
Regional contact information for the Bureau of Indian Affairs offices.
State/Tribal Sites: CA EPA SMBRPD / CAL SITES- The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has
developed an electronic database system called Envirostor with information about sites that are known to be contaminated
with hazardous substances as well as information on uncharacterized properties where further studies may reveal
problems. The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Database (SMBRPD), formerly known as CalSites, is used
primarily by DTSC’s staff as an informational tool to evaluate and track activities at properties that may have been
affected by the release of hazardous substances. The SMBRPD displays information in six categories, two of which are
found in ST. The categories listed under ST are: 1. State Response Sites. 2. School Property Evaluation Program
Properties (SCH) Please Note: Our reports list the above sites as DB Type (STATE). Other categories found in the
SMBRPD are listed in our reports in the DB Types OT and VC. Each Category contains information on properties based
upon the type of work taking place at the site. State Response Sites contains only known and potential hazardous
substance release sites considered as posing the greatest threat to the public. School sites included in ST will be found
within the SMBRPD's School Property Evaluation Program. CORTESE LIST-Pursuant to Government Code Section
65962.5, the Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List has been compiled by Cal/EPA, Hazardous Materials Data
Management Program to provide information about the location of hazardous materials release sites. Cortese List sites that
fall under DTSC's guidelines for State Response sites are included in our reports in the ST category as are qualifying sites
from the Annual Work Plan (formerly Bond Expenditure Plan) and the historic ASPIS databases.
State Spills 90: CA EPA SLIC REGIONS 1 - 9- The California Regional Water Quality Control Boards maintain report of
sites that have records of spills, leaks, investigation, and cleanups.
State/Tribal SWL: CA IWMB/SWRCB/COUNTY SWIS SOLID WASTE INFORMATION SYSTEM-The California
Integrated Waste Management Board maintains a database on solid waste facilities, operations, and disposal sites
throughout the state of California. The types of facilities found in this database include landfills, transfer stations, material
recovery facilities, composting sites, transformation facilities, waste tire sites, and closed disposal sites. For more
information on individual sites call the number listed in the source field.. Please Note: This database contains poor site
location information for many sites in our reports; therefore, it may not be possible to locate or plot some sites in our
reports. WMUDS-The State Water Resources Control Board maintained the Waste Management Unit Database System
(WMUDS). It is no longer updated. It tracked management units for several regulatory programs related to waste
management and its potential impact on groundwater. Two of these programs (SWAT & TPCA) are no longer on-going
regulatory programs as described below. Chapter 15 (SC15) is still an on-going regulatory program and information is
updated periodically but not to the WMUDS database. The WMUDS System contains information from the following
agency databases: Facility, Waste Management Unit (WMU), Waste Discharger System (WDS), SWAT, Chapter 15,
TPCA, RCRA, Inspections, Violations, and Enforcement's. Note: This database contains poor site location information for
many sites in our reports; therefore, it may not be possible to locate or plot some sites in reports. ORANGE COUNTY
LANDFILLS LIST- A list maintained by the Orange County Health Department.
State/Tribal LUST: CA SWRCB/COUNTY LUSTIS- The State Water Resources Control Board maintains a database of
sites with confirmed or unconfirmed leaking underground storage tanks. Information for this database is collected from
the states regional boards quarterly and integrated with this database. SAN DIEGO COUNTY LEAKING TANKS- The
San Diego County Department of Environmental Health maintains a database of sites with confirmed or unconfirmed
leaking underground storage tanks within its HE17/58 database. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat
Duty Specialist at phone number listed in the source information field.
State/Tribal UST/AST: CA EPA/COUNTY/CITY ABOVEGROUND STORAGE TANKS LISTING-The Above Ground
Petroleum Storage Act became State Law effective January 1, 1990. In general, the law requires owners or operators of
AST's with petroleum products to file a storage statement and pay a fee by July 1, 1990 and every two years thereafter,
take specific action to prevent spills, and in certain instances implement a groundwater monitoring program. This law does
not apply to that portion of a tank facility associated with the production oil and regulated by the State Division of Oil and
Gas of the Dept. of Conservation. SWEEPS / FIDS STATE REGISTERED UNDEGROUND STORAGE TANKS- Until
1994 the State Water Resources Control Board maintained a database of registered underground storage tanks statewide
referred to as the SWEEPS System. The SWEEPS UST information was integrated with the CAL EPA's Facility Index
System database (FIDS) which is a master index of information from numerous California agency environmental
databases. That was last updated in 1994. We have included the UST information from the FIDS database in our reports
for historical purposes to help our clients identify where tanks may possibly have existed. For more information on
specific sites from individual paper files archived at the State Water Resources Control Board call the number listed with
the source information. INDIAN LANDS UNDERGROUND STORAGE TANKS LIST- A listing of underground storage
tanks currently on Indian Lands under federal jurisdiction. California Indian Land USTS are administered by US EPA
Region 9.CUPA DATABASES & SOURCES- Definition of a CUPA: A Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) is a
local agency that has been certified by the CAL EPA to implement six state environmental programs within the local
agency's jurisdiction. These can be a county, city, or JPA (Joint Powers Authority). This program was established under
the amendments to the California Health and Safety Code made by SB 1082 in 1994. A Participating Agency (PA) is a
local agency that has been designated by the local CUPA to administer one or more Unified Programs within their
jurisdiction on behalf of the CUPA. A Designated Agency (DA) is an agency that has not been certified by the CUPA but
is the responsible local agency that would implement the six unified programs until they are certified. Please Note: We
collect and maintains information regarding Underground Storage Tanks from the majority of the CUPAS and
Participating Agencies in the State of California. These agencies typically do not maintain nor release such information on
a uniform or consistent schedule; therefore, currency of the data may vary. Please look at the details on a specific site with
a UST record in the First Search Report to determine the actual currency date of the record as provided by the relevant
agency. Numerous efforts are made on a regular basis to obtain updated records.
State/Tribal IC: CA EPA DEED-RESTRICTED SITES LISTING- The California EPA’s Department of Toxic Substances
Control Board maintains a list of deed-restricted sites, properties where the DTSC has placed limits or requirements on the
future use of the property due to varying levels of cleanup possible, practical or necessary at the site.
State/Tribal VCP: CA EPA SMBRPD / CAL SITES- The California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) has
developed an electronic database system called Envirostor with information about sites that are known to be contaminated
with hazardous substances as well as information on uncharacterized properties where further studies may reveal
problems. The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Database (SMBRPD), formerly known as CalSites, is used
primarily by DTSC’s staff as an informational tool to evaluate and track activities at properties that may have been
affected by the release of hazardous substances. The Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) category contains only those
properties undergoing voluntary investigation and/or cleanup and which are listed in the Voluntary Cleanup
Program.Please Note: Our reports list the above sites as DB Type VC.
State Permits: CA EPA/COUNTY SAN DIEGO COUNTY HE17 PERMITS- The HE17/58 database tracks
establishments issued permits and the status of their permits in relation to compliance with federal, state, and local
regulations that the County oversees. It tracks if a site is a hazardous waste generator, TSD, gas station, has underground
tanks, violations, or unauthorized releases. For more information on a specific file call the HazMat Duty Specialist at the
phone number listed in the source information field. SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
PERMITS- Handlers and Generators Permit Information Maintained by the Hazardous Materials Division.
State Other: CA EPA/COUNTY SMBRPD / CAL SITES- The California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC) has developed an electronic database system called Envirostor with information about sites that are known to be
contaminated with hazardous substances as well as information on uncharacterized properties where further studies may
reveal problems. The Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Database (SMBRPD), formerly known as CalSites,
is used primarily by DTSC’s staff as an informational tool to evaluate and track activities at properties that may have been
affected by the release of hazardous substances. The SMBRPD displays information in six categories, two of which are
found in ST. The categories listed under OT are: 1. Unconfirmed Properties Referred to Another Local or State Agency
(REF) 2. Properties where a No Further Action Determination has been made (NFA) Please Note: Our reports list the
above sites as DB Type (OTHER). Other categories found in the SMBRPD are listed in our reports in the DB Types ST
and VC.LA COUNTY SITE MITIGATION COMPLAINT CONTROL LOG- The County of Los Angeles Public Health
Investigation Compliant Control Log. ORANGE COUNTY INDUSTRIAL SITE CLEANUPS- List maintained by the
Orange County Environmental Health Agency. RIVERSIDE COUNTY WASTE GENERATORS-A list of facilities in
Riverside County which generate hazardous waste. SACRAMENTO COUNTY MASTER HAZMAT LIST-Master list of
facilities within Sacramento County with potentially hazardous materials. SACRAMENTO COUNTY TOXIC SITE
CLEANUPS-A list of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred.
Federal IC / EC: EPA FEDERAL ENGINEERING AND INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS- Superfund sites that have
either an engineering or an institutional control. The data includes the control and the media contaminated. RESOURCE
CONSERVATION AND RECOVERY INFORMATION SYSTEM SITES (RCRA) – RCRA site the have institutional
controls.
State/Tribal HW: CA EPA DEPARTMENT OF TOXIC SUBSTANCES CONTROL HAZARDOUS WASTE
MANIFEST INVENTORY-Records maintained by the CA DTSC of Hazardous Waste Manifests used to track and
document the transport of hazardous waste from a generator’s site to the site of its final disposition.
Environmental FirstSearch Database Sources
NPL: EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Updated quarterly
NPL DELISTED: EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Updated quarterly
CERCLIS: EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Updated quarterly
NFRAP: EPA Environmental Protection Agency.
Updated quarterly
RCRA COR ACT: EPA Environmental Protection Agency.
Updated quarterly
RCRA TSD: EPA Environmental Protection Agency.
Updated quarterly
RCRA GEN: EPA/MA DEP/CT DEP Environmental Protection Agency, Massachusetts Department of Environmental
Protection, Connecticut Department of Environmental Protection
Updated quarterly
RCRA NLR: EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Updated quarterly
Fed Brownfield: EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Updated quarterly
ERNS: EPA/NRC Environmental Protection AgencyNational Response Center.
Updated annually
Tribal Lands: DOI/BIA United States Department of the InteriorBureau of Indian Affairs
Updated annually
State/Tribal Sites: CA EPA The CAL EPA, Depart. Of Toxic Substances Control Phone: (916) 323-3400 For Cortese List
information contact The CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control at (916) 445-6532
Updated quarterly/when available
State Spills 90: CA EPA The California State Water Resources Control Board For phone number listings of departments
within each region visit their web sites at: http://www.swrcb.ca.gov/regions.html
Updated when available
State/Tribal SWL: CA IWMB/SWRCB/COUNTY The California Integrated Waste Management Board
Phone:(916) 255-2331
The State Water Resources Control Board
Phone:(916) 227-4365
Orange County Health Department
Phone:(714) 834-3536
Updated quarterly/when available
State/Tribal LUST: CA SWRCB/COUNTY The California State Water Resources Control Board Phone:(916) 227-4416
San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338-2242
Updated quarterly/when available
State/Tribal UST/AST: CA EPA/COUNTY/CITY The State Water Resources Control Board
Phone:(916) 227-4364
CAL EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control
Phone:(916)227-4404
US EPA Region 9 Underground Storage Tank Program
Phone: (415) 972-3372
ALAMEDA COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of Alameda Department of Environmental Health
* Cities of Berkeley, Fremont, Hayward, Livermore / Pleasanton, Newark, Oakland, San Leandro, Union
ALPINE COUNTY CUPA:
* Health Department (Only updated by agency sporadically)
AMADOR COUNTY CUPA:
* County of Amador Environmental Health Department
BUTTE COUNTY CUPA
* County of Butte Environmental Health Division (Only updated by agency biannually)
CALAVERAS COUNTY CUPA:
* County of Calaveras Environmental Health Department
COLUSA COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Dept.
CONTRA COSTA COUNTY CUPA:
* Hazardous Materials Program
DEL NORTE COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Health and Social Services
EL DORADO COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of El Dorado Environmental Health - Solid Waste Div (Only updated by agency annually)
* County of El Dorado EMD Tahoe Division (Only updated by agency annually)
FRESNO COUNTY CUPA:
* Haz. Mat and Solid Waste Programs
GLENN COUNTY CUPA:
* Air Pollution Control District
HUMBOLDT COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Division
IMPERIAL COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Planning and Building
INYO COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
KERN COUNTY CUPA:
* County of Kern Environmental Health Department
* City of Bakersfield Fire Department
KINGS COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Services
LAKE COUNTY CUPA:
* Division of Environmental Health
LASSEN COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Agriculture
LOS ANGELES COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of Los Angeles Fire Department CUPA Data as maintained by the Los Angeles County Department of Public
Works
* County of Los Angeles Environmental Programs Division
* Cities of Burbank, El Segundo, Glendale, Long Beach/Signal Hill, Los Angeles,Pasadena, Santa Fe Springs, Santa
Monica, Torrance, Vernon
MADERA COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
MARIN COUNTY CUPA:
* County of Marin Office of Waste Management
* City of San Rafael Fire Department
MARIPOSA COUNTY CUPA:
* Health Department
MENDOCINO COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
MERCED COUNTY CUPA:
* Division of Environmental Health
MODOC COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Agriculture
MONO COUNTY CUPA:
* Health Department
MONTEREY COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Division
NAPA COUNTY CUPA:
* Hazardous Materials Section
NEVADA COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
ORANGE COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of Orange Environmental Health Department
* Cities of Anaheim, Fullerton, Orange, Santa Ana
* County of Orange Environmental Health Department
PLACER COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of Placer Division of Environmental Health Field Office
* Tahoe City
* City of Roseville Roseville Fire Department
PLUMAS COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
RIVERSIDE COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
SACRAMENTO COUNTY CUPA:
* County Environmental Mgmt Dept, Haz. Mat. Div.
SAN BENITO COUNTY CUPA:
* City of Hollister Environmental Service Department
SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of San Bernardino Fire Department, Haz. Mat. Div.
* City of Hesperia Hesperia Fire Prevention Department
*City of Victorville Victorville Fire Department
SAN DIEGO COUNTY CUPA:
* The San Diego County Dept. of Environmental Health HE 17/58
SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Public Health
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Division
SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of San Luis Obispo Environmental Health Division
* City of San Luis Obispo City Fire Department
SAN MATEO COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
SANTA BARBARA COUNTY CUPA:
* County Fire Dept Protective Services Division
SANTA CLARA COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of Santa Clara Hazardous Materials Compliance Division
* Santa Clara County Central Fire Protection District (Covers Campbell, Cupertino, Los Gatos, & Morgan Hill)
* Cities of Gilroy, Milpitas, Mountain View, Palo Alto, San Jose Fire, Santa Clara, Sunnyvale
SANTA CRUZ COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
SHASTA COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
SIERRA COUNTY CUPA:
* Health Department
SISKIYOU COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
SONOMA COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of Sonoma Department Of Environmental Health
* Cities of Healdsburg / Sebastopol, Petaluma, Santa Rosa
STANISLAUS COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Environmental Resources Haz. Mat. Division
SUTTER COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Agriculture
TEHAMA COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Environmental Health
TRINITY COUNTY CUPA:
* Department of Health
TULARE COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
TUOLUMNE COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health
VENTURA COUNTY CUPAS:
* County of Ventura Environmental Health Division
* Cities of Oxnard, Ventura
YOLO COUNTY CUPA:
* Environmental Health Department
YUBA COUNTY CUPA:
* Yuba County of Emergency Services
Updated quarterly/annually/when available
State/Tribal IC: CA EPA The California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control.Phone:(916) 255-3745
Updated Updated quarterly/annually/when available
State/Tribal VCP: CA EPA The California EPA Department of Toxic Substances Control.Phone:(916) 255-3745
Updated Updated quarterly/annually/when available
State Permits: CA EPA/COUNTY The San Diego County Depart. Of Environmental Health Phone:(619) 338-2211 San
Bernardino County Fire Department Phone:(909) 387-3080
Updated quarterly/when available
State Other: CA EPA/COUNTY The CAL EPA, Depart. Of Toxic Substances Control Phone: (916) 323-3400 The Los
Angeles County Hazardous Materials Division Phone: (323) 890-7806 Orange County Environmental Health Agency
Phone: (714) 834-3536 Riverside County Department of Environmental Health, Hazardous Materials Management
Division Phone:(951) 358-5055 Sacramento County Environmental Management Department Phone: (916) 875-8550
Updated quarterly/when available
Federal IC / EC: EPA Environmental Protection Agency
Updated quarterly
State/Tribal HW: CA EPA CAL EPA, Department of Toxic Substances Control Phone:(916) 255-087
Updated annually/when available
Environmental FirstSearch
Street Name Report for Streets within .25 Mile(s) of Target Property
Target Property:905 EAST KATELLA AVE JOB:SHO-71418.1
ANAHEIM CA 92805
Street Name Dist/Dir Street Name Dist/Dir
Betmor Ln 0.19 SE
Connecting Road 0.03 SW
E Howell Ave 0.21 NW
E Katella Ave 0.03 NE
EAST KATELLA AVE 0.00--
I 5 0.25 SW
Ramp 0.21 SW
S Anaheim Way 0.2 SW
S Betmor Ln 0.19 SE
S Lewis St 0.08 NW
S Santa Cruz St 0.18 SE
Santa Ana Fwy 0.25 NW
Station Cruz St 0.18 SE
HISTORICAL FIRE INSURANCE MAPS
NO MAPS AVAILABLE
01-11-12
SHO-71418.1
905 EAST KATELLA AVE
ANAHEIM CA 92805
A search of FirstSearch Technology Corporation's proprietary database of historical fire insurance
map availability confirmed that there are NO MAPS AVAILABLE for the Subject Location as
shown above.
FirstSearch Technology Corporation's proprietary database of historical fire insurance map
availability represents abstracted information from the Sanborn® Map Company obtained through
online access to the U.S. Library of Congress via local libraries.
Copyright Policy & Disclaimer
Certain Sanborn® Fire Insurance Maps are copyrighted material and may not be reproduced without the
expressed permission of the Sanborn Map Company. FirstSearch Technology Corporation warrants that it will
employ its best efforts to maintain and deliver its information in an efficient and timely manner. Customer
acknowledges that it understands that FirstSearch Technology Corporation obtains the above information from
sources FirstSearch Technology Corporation considers reliable. However, THE WARRANTIES EXPRESSED
HEREIN ARE IN LIEU OF ALL OTHER WARRANTIES, either expressed or implied, including without
limitation any implied warranty of merchantability or fitness or suitability for a particular purpose (whether or
not FirstSearch Technology Corporation may know, have reason to know, or have been advised of such
purpose), whether arising by law or by reason of industry custom or usage. ALL SUCH OTHER
WARRANTIES ARE HEREBY EXPRESSLY DISCLAIMED.
Environmental FirstSearch
1 Mile Radius
ASTM Map: NPL, RCRACOR, STATE Sites
905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805
Source: Tele Atlas
Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) ..................................
Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .............................................................
NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste
Triballand.............................................................................................................
Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius;Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Environmental FirstSearch
.5 Mile Radius
ASTM Map: CERCLIS, RCRATSD, LUST, SWL
905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805
Source: Tele Atlas
Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) ..................................
Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .............................................................
NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste
Triballand.............................................................................................................
Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius;Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Environmental FirstSearch
.25 Mile Radius
ASTM Map: RCRAGEN, ERNS, UST, FED IC/EC, METH LABS
905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805
Source: Tele Atlas
Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) ..................................
Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .............................................................
NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste
Triballand.............................................................................................................
Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius;Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Environmental FirstSearch
.25 Mile Radius
Non-ASTM Map: RCRANLR, Other, HW Manifest
905 EAST KATELLA AVE, ANAHEIM CA 92805
Source: Tele Atlas
Target Site (Latitude: 33.803781 Longitude: -117.896559) ..................................
Identified Site, Multiple Sites, Receptor .............................................................
NPL, DELNPL, Brownfield, Solid Waste Landfill (SWL), Hazardous Waste
Triballand.............................................................................................................
National Historic Sites and Landmark Sites .......................................................
Black Rings Represent 1/4 Mile Radius;Red Ring Represents 500 ft. Radius
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
APPENDIX E
USER PROVDED INFORMATION
Phase I ESA – Shopoff Advisors, LP February 7, 2012
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California EEI Project No. SHO-71418
APPENDIX F
PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP
Commercial Property
905-917 East Katella Avenue
APNS 082-261-23 and 082-261-24
Anaheim, California 92805
Photograph 1 – View north towards the southwest corner of 905-917 East Katella Avenue.
Photograph 2 – View north across the parking area at the eastern margin of 905-917 East Katella
Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 3 – View south along the parking area along the western property margin at 905-917
East Katella Avenue. View is towards East Katella Avenue.
Photograph 4 – View west towards the southeast corner of 905-917 East Katella Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 5 – View east across the northern margin of 905-917 East Katella Avenue, the location
of a former rail spur.
Photograph 6 – View of the kitchen area used by the former tenant Whirlpool Corporation at 905-
917 East Katella Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 7 – View of former Whirlpool Corporation lobby, used by current tenant New Image
Office Design at 905-917 East Katella Avenue.
Photograph 8 – View of the interior office space of the current tenant Golden West Medical at 905-
917 East Katella Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 9 – View of the interior treatment room used by Golden West Medical at 905-917 East
Katella Avenue
Photograph 10 – View of the mezzanine training room used by former tenant Joshua Casey at 905-
917 East Katella Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 11 – View of vacant office space used for storage and as a temporary construction area
for tenant improvements at 905-917 East Katella Avenue.
Photograph 12 – View of warehouse area used by current tenant Evriholder Products at 905-917 East
Katella Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 13 – View of warehouse area used by current tenant New Image Office Designs at 905-
917 East Katella Avenue.
Photograph 14 – View of warehouse area used by current tenant Tandem Designs at 905-917 East
Katella Avenue
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 15 – View looking east along East Katella Avenue from South Lewis Street.
Photograph 16 – View looking north along South Lewis Street from East Katella Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
SHOPOFF ADVISORS, LP
Commercial Property
1005, 1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue
APNs 082-261-27 and 082-261-28
Anaheim, California 92805
Photograph 1 – View north along the drive way towards the entrance to the property off of East
Katella Avenue. Building 1005 East Katella Avenue is in view.
Photograph 2 – View northeast towards buildings 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue from the
driveway area on the southern side of the buildings.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 3 – View north towards the driveway area between buildings 1015 and 1025 East
Katella Avenue.
Photograph 4 – View south along the eastern margin of the overall subject property (east of building
1025 East Katella Avenue).
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 5 – View south along the western side of building 1015 East Katella Avenue.
Photograph 6 – View south across the rooftops of 1015 and 1025 East Katella Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 7 – View east along the northern margin of the property north of 1015 and 1025 East
Katella Avenue.
Photograph 8 – View of the interior space of 1015 East Katella Avenue, Suite C used by Telco
Electric.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 9 – View of the interior space of 1015 East Katella Avenue, Suites F,G and H used by
Digitech Business Solutions (office machine repair and service).
Photograph 10 – View of the interior space of 1025 East Katella Avenue, Suite C used by Axxis
Motorsports (off road motorcycle repair and equipment).
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 11 – View of interior of 1025 East Katella Avenue, Suites D and E. The space is used as
a workroom and shop area by OC and C Construction (custom kitchen, bath and general
construction).
Photograph 12 – View of interior space of 1025 East Katella Avenue, Suite G used by Christopher
Beliovsky (miscellaneous private auto repair and refurbishing).
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 13 – View of pad-mounted electrical transformer located along the northern margin of
the subject property.
Photograph 14 – View of the pole-mounted transformers on overhead electrical power line running
along western margin of property.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 15 – View east towards the subject property, Mr. Stox Restaurant at 1105 East Katella
Avenue. East Katella Avenue is in view to the south.
Photograph 16 – View of the interior dining area of Mr. Stox Restaurant at 1105 East Katella
Avenue.
Shopoff Advisors, LP, Anaheim, California 2012 EEI Project No. SHO-71418
Photograph 17 – View of the kitchen area of the Mr. Stox Restaurant at 1105 East Katella Avenue.
Photograph 18 – View of the cooking grease stored at the northeast corner of the subject property at
1105 East Katella Avenue.
September 2012
T R A F F I C I M PA C T A N A LY S I S U P D AT E
PLATINUM GATEWAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
(805 AND 917 EAST KATELLA AVENUE)
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
September 2012
T R A F F I C I M PA C T A N A LY S I S U P D AT E
PLATINUM GATEWAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
(805 AND 917 EAST KATELLA AVENUE)
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA
Submitted to:
The Shopoff Group, L.P.
2 Park Plaza, Suite 700
Irvine, California 92614
(949) 231-5068
Prepared by:
LSA Associates, Inc.
20 Executive Park, Suite 200
Irvine, California 92614
(949) 553-0666
Project No. SHP1201
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................................... 1
INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1
METHODOLOGY ................................................................................................................................. 3
EXISTING CONDITIONS .................................................................................................................... 8
OPENING YEAR (2016) BASELINE CONDITIONS ....................................................................... 11
PROJECT IMPACTS ........................................................................................................................... 15
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS ...................................................................................... 15
OPENING YEAR (2016) PLUS PROJECT CONDITION ................................................................. 22
SPECIAL ISSUES ............................................................................................................................... 22
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS ........................................... 29
RECOMMENDED CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS .................................................................. 29
CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 31
APPENDICES
A: EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS
B: ICU LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
C: CALTRANS METHODOLOGY LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
D: MITIGATED LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/25/12» ii
FIGURES AND TABLES
FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Site and Study Area Intersections ............................................................................... 2
Figure 2: Site Plan .................................................................................................................................. 4
Figure 3: Existing Intersection Geometrics and Traffic Control Devices .............................................. 5
Figure 4: Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes ..................................................................................... 9
Figure 5: Approved/Pending Projects Location ................................................................................... 12
Figure 6: Approved/Pending Projects Trip Assignment ....................................................................... 14
Figure 7: Opening Year (2016) Conditions Traffic Volumes .............................................................. 16
Figure 8: Proposed Project Trip Distribution and Assignment ............................................................ 19
Figure 9: Existing Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes ............................................................... 20
Figure 10: Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes ........................................ 23
Figure 11: Connector Road and Driveway - Opening Year (2016) Project Traffic Volumes .............. 25
Figure 12: Lewis Street/Northerly Connector Road Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak
Hour Warrant ...................................................................................................................... 27
Figure 13: Easterly Connector Road/Katella Avenue Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak
Hour Warrant ...................................................................................................................... 28
TABLES
Table A: Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary ............................................... 10
Table B: Cumulative Projects Trip Generation .................................................................................... 13
Table C: Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary ........................... 17
Table D: Project Trip Generation Summary......................................................................................... 18
Table E: Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary ............................ 21
Table F: Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service
Summary ................................................................................................................................ 24
Table G: Caltrans Methodology Level of Service Summary ............................................................... 30
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 1
PLATINUM GATEWAY RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT
(805 AND 915 EAST KATELLA AVENUE)
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS UPDATE
LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) has prepared the following update to the previous Traffic Impact
Analysis prepared by KHR Associates in January 2008, to identify the potential traffic impacts
resulting from the development of the revised Platinum Gateway project. LSA has prepared this
update consistent with the City of Anaheim’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies and
with applicable provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA).
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
The project site consists of approximately 7.9 acres (ac) located at 805 and 917 East Katella Avenue
in the City of Anaheim (City), California. The project proposes the development of 399 residential
apartments.
This study analyzes the a.m. and p.m. peak-hour levels of service (LOS) at study area intersections.
Project impacts were evaluated for the following scenarios:
• 1. Existing (2008) conditions
• 2. Existing (2008) plus project conditions
• 3. Project Opening (2016) conditions
• 4. Project Opening (2016) plus project conditions
Based on the results of this traffic study, the proposed project would significantly impact the
intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue, which impact can be mitigated by widening Katella
Avenue to its ultimate width (4 westbound lanes) along the project frontage.
INTRODUCTION
The purpose of this update to the previous traffic impact analysis (prepared by KHR, January 2008) is
to identify potential traffic and circulation impacts associated with the development of the revised
Platinum Gateway project. Figure 1 shows the location of the proposed project, and the study area
intersections analyzed in this report. Issues addressed in this analysis include off-site intersection
impacts, site access, and interface with the arterial street system.
5
57
KATELLA AVE
GENE AUTRY WAY
HOWELL
AVE
STATE COLLEGE BLVDLEWIS STANAHEIM WAYMANCHESTER AVEPROJECT
SITE
F I G U R E 1
Platinum Gateway
NO SCALE
N
Project Site and
Study Area Intersections
I:\SHP1201\G\Gateway\Study Area Intersections.cdr (7/6/12)
8
LEGEND
- Study Area Intersection
8
5
76
4321
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 3
The traffic analysis for the proposed project examines four scenarios:
1. Existing (2008) conditions
2. Existing (2008) plus project conditions
3. Project Opening (2016) conditions
4. Project Opening (2016) plus project conditions
Prior to preparation of this traffic analysis, LSA discussed the scope of work with the City Traffic
Engineering staff. The traffic analysis provides an assessment of traffic impacts and a determination
of traffic mitigation as required for CEQA compliance.
Project Description
The project site consists of approximately 7.9 ac located at 805 and 917 East Katella Avenue in
Anaheim, California. The property is located within the Platinum Triangle District of the City. The
project proposes the development of 399 residential apartments. Figure 2 illustrates the site plan of
the proposed project.
Primary access to the project site will be provided via a full access driveway (Connector Road) along
Lewis Street located north of the project and a right-in/right-out access driveway (Connector Road)
along Katella Avenue located east of the project. The north and east Connector Roads along the
northerly and easterly boundaries of the project site, will not only provide access and circulation to
the project site, but to the adjacent properties to the north and east as well.
METHODOLOGY
This update to the previous traffic impact analysis is prepared consistent with the objectives and
requirements of the City’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies and applicable
provisions of CEQA.
Consistent with the previous KHR study and confirmed with the City Traffic Engineering staff, the
study area analyzed in this report includes the following intersections. Figure 3 provides the existing
geometrics and traffic control devices at each study area intersection.
FIGURE 2 Platinum Gateway Site Plan P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Site Plan .xls (8/21/2012)
1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave
2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave
3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave
6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave
FIGURE 3
Legend Platinum Gateway
Signal Existing Intersection Geometrics and Traffic Control Devices
Stop Sign aacccage
cccdeabccdccceaaccc
cccexvvtt
acccexvt accdxvvvtt aacccexvt
xzt ccceccceacccead aaccd adeaccdaaccde
wtt aaccdage aceaccdccce
F Free Right Turn
F F
P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Geo_Exist.xls (9/25/2012)
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 6
Study Area Intersections
• Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound ramps-Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue
• Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue
• Lewis Street/Katella Avenue
• State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue
• Sportstown/Katella Avenue
• Howell Street/Katella Avenue
• State Route 57 (SR-57) southbound ramps/Katella Avenue
• SR-57 northbound ramps/Katella Avenue
Intersection Level of Service Methodology
The Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) methodology was used to determine the LOS for the
signalized study area intersections consistent with City requirements. This methodology compares the
volume-to-capacity (v/c) ratios of conflicting turn movements at an intersection, sums up these
critical conflicting v/c ratios for each intersection approach, and determines the overall ICU.
The resulting ICU is expressed in terms of LOS, where LOS A represents free-flow activity and
LOS F represents overcapacity operation. LOS is a qualitative assessment of the quantitative effects
of such factors as traffic volume, roadway geometrics, speed, delay, and maneuverability on roadway
and intersection operations. LOS criteria for signalized intersections using the ICU methodology are
presented below.
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 7
LOS Description
A
No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic, and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication.
Typically, the approach appears quite open, turns are made easily, and nearly all drivers find
freedom of operation.
B
This service level represents stable operation, where an occasional approach phase is fully utilized,
and a substantial number are nearing full use. Many drivers begin to feel restricted within platoons
of vehicles.
C
This level still represents stable operating conditions. Occasionally, drivers may have to wait
through more than one red signal indication, and backups may develop behind turning vehicles.
Most drivers feel somewhat restricted, but not objectionably so.
D
This level encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability at the intersection.
Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period;
however, enough cycles with lower demand occur to permit periodic clearance of developing
queues, thus preventing excessive backups.
E
Capacity occurs at the upper end of this service level. It represents the most vehicles that any
particular intersection approach can accommodate. Full utilization of every signal cycle is attained
no matter how great the demand.
F
This level describes forced flow operations at low speeds, where volumes exceed capacity. These
conditions usually result from queues of vehicles backing up from a restriction downstream. Speeds
are reduced substantially, and stoppages may occur for short or long periods of time due to the
congestion. In the extreme case, speed can drop to zero.
The relationship between LOS and the ICU value (i.e., v/c ratio) is as follows:
Level of Service Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU)
A < 0.600
B 0.601–0.700
C 0.701–0.800
D 0.801–0.900
E 0.901–1.000
F > 1.000
The City considers intersections with a v/c ratio of 0.90 (LOS D) as the upper limit of satisfactory
operations. Mitigation is required for any intersection where project traffic causes the intersection to
deteriorate from LOS D to LOS E or F.
A transportation impact on an intersection is considered significant in accordance with the following
table. The “Final V/C Ratio” includes the future v/c ratio at an intersection, considering traffic from
existing conditions, ambient growth, approved/related projects, and the proposed project, but without
any proposed mitigation.
Level of Service Final V/C Ratio
Project-Related Increase in
V/C
C > 0.701–0.800 0.050
D > 0.801–0.900 0.030
E, F > 0.901 0.010
v/c = volume-to-capacity ratio
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 8
EXISTING CONDITIONS
Existing Circulation System
Key roadways in the vicinity of the proposed project are as follows:
• Interstate 5. The I-5 freeway is located southwest of the project site and is a major freeway that
extends throughout Orange County. The I-5 freeway in the project vicinity has four to five mixed-
flow lanes and one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each (northbound and southbound)
direction. Primary access to the project site from the I-5 freeway is provided via northbound and
southbound on/off-ramps at Katella Avenue.
• Katella Avenue. Katella Avenue is southern boundary of the project and provides access to the
project site via a right-in/right-out driveway. This roadway is designated as an east-west Stadium
Area Smart Street (eight-lane divided) in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element. Katella
Avenue is also designated as a CMP facility.
• State College Boulevard. State College Boulevard is located east of the project site. This
roadway is designated as a north-south Major Arterial (six-lane divided) in the City General Plan
Circulation Element. The roadway is built out to its master-planned lane geometrics.
• State Route 57 (SR-57). SR-57 is located east of the project site and is a freeway that extends
through Orange County. Direct access to the project site from SR-57 is provided via northbound
and southbound on/off ramps at Katella Avenue. The SR-57 freeway has five mixed flow lanes
and one HOV lane in each direction through Anaheim.
• Lewis Street. Lewis Street is located immediately to the west of the project. Access to Lewis
Street is provided at a connector road. This roadway is designated as a Secondary Arterial (four-
lane undivided) in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element.
Existing Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Peak-hour turn volumes for the study area intersections were obtained from the previous KHR study
which was collected in 2006 and 2007. Based on discussion with the City Traffic Engineering staff,
LSA confirmed the use of the traffic counts from the previous study. Based on review of historical
count data, the traffic counts along majority of the freeways, arterial and secondary streets around the
Platinum Triangle Area have gone down after 2006/2007. The traffic volumes in 2011/12 have not
returned to 2006/07 levels. Hence, analyzing the existing conditions using the 2006/2007 counts
would present a conservative analysis. Figure 4 presents the existing a.m. and p.m. peak-hour turn
movement volumes for the study area intersections. The existing traffic counts are provided in
Appendix A.
Table A summarizes the results of the existing a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for the 8 study
area intersections. The existing LOS calculation worksheets are contained in Appendix B. As Table A
indicates, all study area intersections operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) in the a.m. and
p.m. peak hours.
832 / 1592
161 / 409
1136 / 790
626 / 402
1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave
58 / 91
882 / 1840
64 / 104
1615 / 905
2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave
4 / 50 66 / 64 134 / 96
802 / 1542 523 / 1264 933 / 1292
16 / 15 384 / 240 38 / 14
10 / 131 264 / 160 36 / 25
1411 / 858 916 / 718 981 / 903
348 / 6 204 / 84 50 / 42
3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave
460 / 171
157 / 475 170 / 399 994 / 1291
1054 / 1065 864 / 1337 207 / 86
1023 / 1082 964 / 872 70 / 44
229 / 421 259 / 429 1076 / 1069
93 / 56
6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave
FIGURE 4
XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway
Existing Conditions Traffic Volumes72 / 10143 / 192452 / 202532 / 24523 / 10627 / 365 / 2831 / 504 / 422 / 42518 / 426220 / 212359 / 85836 / 6613 / 974 / 114160 / 2466 / 2159 / 10497 / 266869 / 72282 / 107246 / 102384 / 674151 / 7147 / 3343 / 48433 / 168395 / 881147 / 29664 / 914 / 657 / 16251 / 3075 / 135 / 134P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Exist NP.xls 8/21/2012
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.LOS V/C LOS V/C1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.380 A 0.4002. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.520 B 0.6503. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue A 0.460 B 0.6304. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue A 0.570 A 0.5905. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.280 A 0.3906. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.350 A 0.3407. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.420 A 0.3908. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.450 A 0.490Notes:Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study.Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008).Table A: Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service SummaryAM Peak Hour PM Peak HourExisting ConditionsIntersectionP:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\existing no project GATEWAY(9/25/2012)
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 11
OPENING YEAR (2016) BASELINE CONDITIONS
According to the project applicant, the proposed residential project will be completed by 2016.
Consistent with the previous KHR study, to determine a future (2016) condition, traffic volumes for
other committed and/or approved (cumulative) developments were added to the existing baseline
traffic volumes. In addition, a growth factor of 6 percent was added to the existing baseline traffic
volumes.
Consistent with the previous KHR study 14 cumulative projects were identified in the opening year
(2016) condition. The following development projects are being proposed in the vicinity of the
project:
1. Stadium Lofts (1,801 E. Katella Avenue): 7,839 square foot (sf) restaurants, 2,820 sf retail, 390
apartments.
2. Avalon Bay (2100 E. Katella Avenue): 261 apartments, 2,740 sf retail and 10,000 sf restaurant.
3. The Hanover Company (1818 S. State College Boulevard): 266 apartments.
4. Anavia (2045 S. State College Boulevard): 265 apartments.
5. Archstone Gateway (2150 S. State College Boulevard): 884 apartments.
6. Platinum Triangle Condominiums (1331 E. Katella Avenue): 337 condominiums.
7. Park Viridian (1515 E. Katella Avenue): 320 apartments, 451 condominiums.
8. Lennar A-Town Metro (1404 E. Katella Avenue): 2,681 residential units, and 150,000 sf of
commercial use.
9. Platinum Tower (2210–2220 E. Orangewood Avenue): 591,500 sf office and 8,500 sf retail.
10. Orangewood Condominiums (2211 E. Orangewood Avenue): 325 condominiums.
11. Lennar A-Town Stadium (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue): 2,681 condominiums and 150,000
sf retail.
12. Platinum Vista (1105 E. Katella Avenue): 350 apartments.
13. Gene Autry Experience (1969 S. State College Boulevard): 1,208 condominiums, 100,000 sf
office and 50,000 sf retail.
14. Alexan Orangewood (2020 and 2100 E. Orangewood Avenue): 690 apartments.
Figure 5 illustrates the location of the cumulative projects. The project trip generation for the
approved/pending projects was calculated using trip rates documented in the Institute of
Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation manual (7th Edition) and is presented in Table B.
LSA generally used the trip generation, distribution and assignment from the previous KHR study.
Figure 6 illustrates the cumulative projects’ trip assignments.
557KATELLAAVEGENEAUTRYWAYHOWELLAVESTATE COLLEGE BLVDLEWIS STANAH
E
I
M
W
A
Y
MANCH
E
S
T
E
R
A
V
EPROJECTSITE FIGURE 5Platinum GatewayNO SCALENApproved/Pending Projects LocationI:\SHP1201\G\Gateway\Approved Projects.cdr (8/20/12)8LEGEND- StudyArea Intersection8576432117326845119101314121234- Stadium Lofts- Avalon Bay- Hanover Company- Anavia5678- Archstone Gateway- Platinum Triangle Condos- Park Viridian- LennarA-Town Metro9101112- Platinum Tower- Orangewood Condos- LennarA-Town Stadium- Platinum Vista1314- GeneAutry Experience- Alexan Orangewood
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.InOutTotalInOut Total1 "Stadium Lofts" (1801 E. Katella Avenue)- Condominiums11,732 60 160 220 109 45 1542Avalon Bay "2100 at Platinum Triangle" (2100 E. Katella Avenue)-Apartments/Retails/Restaurant2261/2.74/10 DU/TSF 3,033 105 145 250 158 114 2723The Hanover Company "element' (1818 S. State College Boulevard)_Apartments2266 DU 1,721 30 119 149 102 55 1574Anavia (2045 S. State College Boulevard)-Apartments2265 DU 1,715 30 119 149 102 55 1575"Archstone Gateway" (2150 S. State College Boulevard)-Apartments2884 DU 5,860 71 380 451 371 177 5486Platinum Triangle Condominiums (1331 E. Katella Avenue)-Condominiums3337/1.300 DU/TSF 2,286 65 125 190 119 89 2087Park Viridian (1515 E. Katella Avenue)-Apartments/Condominiums4320/451 DU 4,988 146 285 431 262 193 4558Lennar "A-Town Metro" (1404 E. Katella Avenue)-Residential/Commercial52,681/150.000 DU/TSF 19,418 -171 780 608 1,108 517 1,6249Platinum Tower (2210-2220 E. Orangewood Avenue)-Office/Retail2591.500/8.500 TSF 9,965 1,049 133 1,182 250 1,017 1,26710Orangewood Condominium (2211 E. Orangewood Ave.)-Condominiums6325 DU 2,103 62 120 182 111 81 19211Lennar "A-Town Stadium" (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue)-Condominium/Retail72,681/150.00 DU/TSF 8,941 32 371 403 485 225 71012Platinum Vista (1105 E. Katella Avenue)- Apartments8350 DU 2,352 36 143 179 141 76 21713"Gene Autry Experience" (1969 S. State College Blvd.)-Condominiums/Office/Retail91,208/100/50 DU/TSF 8,607 88 328 416 436 298 73414 "Alexan Orangewood" (2020 & 2100 E. Orangewood Avenue)-Apartments10690 DU 2,898 -63 126 63 138 -22 116Total Trip Generation Generation75,6191,5403,3344,8733,8922,9206,811Notes:DU: Dwelling Unit.TSF: Thousand Square Feet.1Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Lofts Mixed-Use Development, dated September 2004.2Trip generation provided by City of Anaheim Traffic Engineering Staff.3Trlp generation based on Anaheim Transportation Analysis for the Platinum Triangle Condominium, dated June 2005.4Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Park Residential Development, dated December 2004.5Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Metro, dated August 2005.6Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Orangewood Condominiums, dated September 2006.7Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Stadium, dated June 2006.8Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Platinum Vista, dated July 2012.9Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Gene Autry Experience, dated February 2007.10Trip generation based on Alexan Orangewood Traffic Impact Study, dated January 17, 2008.Table B: Cumulative Projects Trip GenerationAM Peak Hour PM Peak HourLand UseSize Unit ADTP:\SHP1201\xls\Cum proj.xls
266 / 272
74 / 50
152 / 295
1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave
222 / 190
362 / 332
231 / 530
2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave
18 / 0
1 / 0 117 / 406
587 / 519 50 / 165 95 / 576
251 / 688 116 / 112 81 / 23
334 / 308 523 / 338
295 / 216
3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave
61 / 280 38 / 170 91 / 570
595 / 264 220 / 106 523 / 337
121 / 73 375 / 159
6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave
FIGURE 6
XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway
Approved/Pending Projects Trip Assignment23 / 1106 / 03 / 329 / 030 / 290158 / 4010 / 115 / 62128 / 15652 / 223 / 1032 / 074 / 280116 / 10962 / 261 / 3165 / 0 0 / 1
P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Cumu assign.xls 9/25/2012
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 15
Opening Year (2016) Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Opening Year (2016) a.m., and p.m. peak-hour traffic volumes are shown in Figure 7. Table C
summarizes the results of the future a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all study area
intersections. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B. As this table indicates, all study area
intersections will continue to operate at acceptable LOS during both the peak hours.
PROJECT IMPACTS
Trip Generation
The proposed project considers development of 399 residential apartments. The daily and peak-hour
trips for the apartment use were generated using trip rates contained in the ITE Trip Generation
Manual, 7th Edition (2003). The project trip generation is presented in Table D. As the table indicates,
the proposed project has the potential to generate approximately 2,681 average daily traffic (ADT),
including 203 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 247 trips in the p.m. peak hour.
Trip Distribution and Assignment
Trip distribution defines the regional percentage origins/destinations for a project. Trip distribution
for the proposed project is based on trip distribution used in the previous KHR study. Approximately
5 percent of the trips are destined north via Lewis Street; 20 percent north via I-5; 5 percent north via
State College Boulevard; 15 percent north via SR-57; 10 percent south via Lewis street; 15 percent
south via I-5; 5 percent south via State College Boulevard; 10 percent south via SR-57; 5 percent west
via Katella Avenue; and10 percent east via Katella Avenue. It should be noted that LSA adjusted the
trip distribution along Anaheim Way and Manchester Avenue to reflect the one-way streets and actual
freeway. Figure 8 shows the regional trip distribution and assignment for the proposed project.
EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS
Traffic generated by the proposed project was added to the existing traffic volumes at the study area
intersections. Figure 9 shows the resulting existing plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour traffic
volumes.
Existing Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Table E summarizes the results of the existing plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for
all study area intersections. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B. As this table indicates,
all study area intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (i.e., LOS D or better) in the
a.m. and p.m. peak hours with implementation of the proposed project. The project will not create
significant impacts at any of the study area intersections in the existing plus project condition.
1164 / 1970
259 / 492
1362 / 1148
664 / 427
1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave
304 / 297
1327 / 2301
68 / 110
1954 / 1526
2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave
5 / 52 88 / 68 141 / 101
1480 / 2167 683 / 1790 1086 / 1976
17 / 16 458 / 420 40 / 15
378 / 188 403 / 286 119 / 49
1734 / 1590 1349 / 1092 1603 / 1309
10 / 6 554 / 328 52 / 44
3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave
488 / 181
165 / 499 179 / 306 1157 / 1982
1175 / 1420 948 / 1661 220 / 91
1699 / 1415 1241 / 941 74 / 47
376 / 523 668 / 500 1708 / 1494
99 / 59
6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave
FIGURE 7
XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway
Opening Year (2016) Conditions Traffic Volumes77 / 11075 / 204502 / 213565 / 16327 / 11529 / 385 / 2932 / 524 / 423 / 44579 / 759231 / 223381 / 91138 / 6914 / 9247 / 565168 / 2586 / 22155 / 159120 / 3511050 / 922139 / 135267 / 225408 / 715160 / 7552 / 3546 / 51539 / 479535 / 1044218 / 34067 / 964 / 660 / 17431 / 3265 / 137 / 142P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Opening Yr NP.xls 9/25/2012
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.LOS V/C LOS V/C1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.4802. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.590 C 0.7503. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue C 0.750 D 0.8404. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue C 0.780 D 0.8305. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.400 A 0.5506. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.4207. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.490 A 0.4608. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue B 0.660 B 0.670Notes:Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008).Table C: Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service SummaryIntersectionOpening Year No Project ConditionsAM Peak Hour PM Peak HourP:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\Opening yr no project GATEWAY(9/26/2012)
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.Size Unit ADT In Out Total In Out TotalTrip Rates 1Apartment (Land Use:220) DU 6.72 0.10 0.41 0.51 0.40 0.22 0.62Trip GenerationApartment 399 DU 2,681 41 163 203 161 87 247Gross Project Trip Generation 2,681 41 163 204 161 87 248Notes:1 ITE Trip Generation Manual, 7th Edition.DU-Dwelling UnitsTable D - Project Trip Generation SummaryLand UseAM Peak Hour PM Peak HourP:\SHP1201\xls\Trip Generation.xls (9/24/2012)
8 / 5
41 / 22
2 / 8
1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave
33 / 17
49 / 27
10 / 40
2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave
41 / 22 14 / 56 14 / 56
17 / 65 8 / 4 57 / 31
57 / 31
8 / 4
3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave
8 / 32 4 / 16 14 / 56
41 / 22 17 / 9 57 / 31
16 / 19 24 / 13
6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave
FIGURE 8
XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway
Proposed Project Trip Distribution and Assignment8 / 327 / 252 / 841 / 2273 / 392 / 84 / 166 / 244 / 16P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Trip Assign.xls 8/21/2012
840 / 1597
202 / 431
1138 / 798
626 / 402
1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave
91 / 108
931 / 1867
64 / 104
1625 / 945
2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave
4 / 50 66 / 64 134 / 96
843 / 1564 537 / 1320 947 / 1348
16 / 15 384 / 240 38 / 14
27 / 196 272 / 164 36 / 25
1411 / 858 973 / 749 1038 / 934
348 / 6 212 / 88 50 / 42
3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave
460 / 171
157 / 475 170 / 399 1008 / 1347
1062 / 1097 868 / 1353 207 / 86
1064 / 1104 981 / 881 70 / 44
245 / 440 283 / 442 1133 / 1100
93 / 56
6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave
FIGURE 9
XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway
Existing Plus Project Condtions Traffic Volumes72 / 10143 / 192456 / 218532 / 24523 / 10627 / 365 / 2831 / 504 / 422 / 42524 / 450220 / 212359 / 85840 / 8213 / 976 / 122201 / 2686 / 21132 / 14399 / 274869 / 72282 / 107253 / 127384 / 674151 / 7147 / 3343 / 48441 / 200395 / 881147 / 29664 / 914 / 657 / 16251 / 3075 / 135 / 134P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Exist P.xls 9/25/2012
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourLOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C V/C V/C1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.380 A 0.400 A 0.390 A 0.400 0.010 0.0002. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.520 B 0.650 A 0.520 B 0.650 0.000 0.0003. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue A 0.460 B 0.630 A 0.520 B 0.670 0.060 0.0404. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue A 0.570 A 0.590 A 0.580 B 0.620 0.010 0.0305. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.280 A 0.390 A 0.290 A 0.400 0.010 0.0106. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.350 A 0.340 A 0.350 A 0.350 0.000 0.0107. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.420 A 0.390 A 0.420 A 0.410 0.000 0.0208. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.450 A 0.490 A 0.470 A 0.510 0.020 0.020Notes: Significant ImpactLevel of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study.Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008).Table E: Existing Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service SummaryIntersectionExisting Conditions Existing Plus Project ConditionsDifference in V/C RatioAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourP:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\existing plus proj GATEWAY(9/26/2012)
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 22
OPENING YEAR (2016) PLUS PROJECT CONDITION
Traffic generated by the project was added to the future traffic volumes at each study area
intersection. Figure 10 illustrates the resulting future plus project daily, a.m., and p.m. peak-hour
traffic volumes.
Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Summary Analysis
Table F summarizes the results of the future plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all
study area intersections. The LOS worksheets are provided in Appendix B. As this table indicates, all
study area intersections will continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (i.e., LOS D or better) in the
a.m. and p.m. peak hours with the exception of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The project will
significantly impact the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue based on the City’s significance
criteria. The project will add traffic resulting in a V/C ratio change greater than the city threshold of
0.030. Mitigation measures will be identified to offset this project impact.
SPECIAL ISSUES
Project Access
As illustrated in the site plan (Figure 2, above), access to the project site will be provided via a full-
access primary connector road along Lewis Street and a right-in/right-out secondary connector road
along Katella Avenue. The connector road along Lewis Street is located along northerly boundary of
the project site while the connector road along Katella Avenue is located along the easterly boundary
of the project site. Each connector road is approximately 26 ft wide. Access to the parking garage is
provided on to the two (northerly and easterly) connector roads. These full accesses are also 26 ft
wide.
The easterly connector road (which connects to Katella Avenue) also provides access to the adjacent
development (Platinum Vista). The proposed plans for the adjacent development shows two access
driveways from the easterly connector road.
Traffic generated by the proposed project and the adjacent (Platinum Vista) project was distributed
along the connector roads (shown in Figure 11). Based on direction from the City, all-way stop
control warrants analysis was conducted for the three access locations along the easterly connector
road for both the proposed project (Platinum Gateway – one access) and the adjacent project
(Platinum Vista – two access) for the Opening Year (2016) with project conditions. Criteria from
section 2B.07 - Multiway Stop Applications from the Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices
(MUTCD), were used to determine if an all-way stop was warranted at the three locations.
1172 / 1975
300 / 514
1364 / 1156
664 / 427
1 Manchester Ave/Katella Ave
337 / 314
1376 / 2328
68 / 110
1964 / 1566
2 Anaheim Way/Katella Ave
5 / 52 88 / 68 141 / 101
1521 / 2189 697 / 1846 1100 / 2032
17 / 16 458 / 420 40 / 15
395 / 253 411 / 290 119 / 49
1734 / 1590 1406 / 1123 1660 / 1340
10 / 6 562 / 332 52 / 44
3 Lewis St/Katella Ave 4 State College Blvd/Katella Ave 5 Sportstown/Katella Ave
488 / 181
165 / 499 179 / 306 1171 / 2038
1183 / 1452 952 / 1677 220 / 91
1740 / 1437 1258 / 950 74 / 47
392 / 542 692 / 513 1765 / 1525
99 / 59
6 SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Ave 7 SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Ave 8 Howell Ave/Katella Ave
FIGURE 10
XXX / YYY AM / PM Volumes Platinum Gateway
Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Traffic Volumes60 / 17431 / 3265 / 137 / 142535 / 1044218 / 34067 / 964 / 6160 / 7552 / 3546 / 51547 / 511274 / 250408 / 715381 / 91142 / 8514 / 9249 / 573209 / 2806 / 22228 / 198122 / 3591050 / 922139 / 1355 / 2932 / 524 / 423 / 44585 / 783231 / 22377 / 11075 / 204506 / 229565 / 16327 / 11529 / 38P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Vol_Opening Yr P.xls 9/25/2012
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourLOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C V/C V/C1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.480 A 0.480 A 0.480 0.010 0.0002. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.590 C 0.750 A 0.600 C 0.750 0.010 0.0003. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue C 0.750 D 0.840 D 0.820 E 0.940 0.070 0.1004. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue C 0.780 D 0.830 C 0.790 D 0.850 0.010 0.0205. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.400 A 0.550 A 0.420 A 0.560 0.020 0.0106. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.420 A 0.480 A 0.420 0.010 0.0007. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.490 A 0.460 A 0.500 A 0.470 0.010 0.0108. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue B 0.660 B 0.670 B 0.680 B 0.680 0.020 0.010Notes: Significant ImpactResultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008).Table F: Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service SummaryIntersectionOpening Year No Project Conditions Opening Year Plus Project Conditions Difference in V/C RatioAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourP:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\Opening yr plus proj GATEWAY(9/26/2012)
F I G U R E 11
Connector Road and Driveway - Opening Year (2016)
Project Traffic Volumes
N
Platinum Gateway
I:\SHP1201\G\Gateway\Driveway Volumes.cdr (7/9/12)
NO SCALE
LEGEND
- AM/PM Peak Hour VolumesXX/YY
KATELLA AVELEWIS STPROJECT
SITE
30/16
31/1791/4910/56/226/252/86/254/18
91/4914/5412/4633/13112/4617/67
42/164
46/24
25/14
8/4
206/110
47/25
25/13
18/72 vv123/65
v 22/5280/58v
16/64v
28/7735/139 v92/104v 127/83v
v 47/65v35/18
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 26
Per MUTCD, the following criteria should be considered for multiway STOP sign installation:
A. Where traffic control signals are justified, the multiway stop is an interim measure
that can be installed quickly to control traffic while arrangements are being made for
the installation of the traffic control signal.
B. A crash problem, as indicated by 5 or more reported crashes in a 12-month period
that are susceptible to correction by a multiway stop installation. Such crashes
include right-and left-turn collisions as well as right-angle collisions.
C. Minimum Volumes:
1. The vehicular volume entering the intersection from the major street approaches
(total of both approaches) averages at least 300 vehicles per hour for any 8 hours
of an average day, and
2. The combined vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle volume entering the intersection
from the minor street approaches (total of both approaches) averages at least 200
units per hour for the same 8 hours, with an average delay to minor-street
vehicular traffic of at least 30 seconds per vehicle during the highest hour, but
3. If the 85th percentile approach speed of the major street traffic exceeds 65 km/h
or exceeds 40 mph, the minimum vehicular volume warrants are 70 percent of
the above values.
D. Where no single criterion is satisfied, but where criteria B, C.1, and C.2 are all satisfied to 80
percent of the minimum values. Criterion C.3 is excluded from this condition.
Based on the peak hour volume (less than 150), the three intersections do not satisfy the peak hour
traffic signal warrant. Therefore, the intersections do not satisfy criteria A. Since, all these
intersections will be built in the future; currently there is no accident data available. Hence, criteria B
is not applicable. Based on the projected peak hour volumes along the easterly connector and at the
three intersections (less than 150) the minimum volume (criteria C) is not satisfied. Since, criteria B is
not applicable, criteria D (which is based on criteria B) is also not applicable.
Based on the above discussion, all-way stop control is not recommended at the three intersections
along the easterly connector. The intersections should be controlled by stop sign at the project
accesses with uncontrolled traffic operation along the easterly connector.
Additionally, traffic signal warrants analysis was conducted at the locations where the connector
roads intersect Lewis Street and Katella Avenue for the Opening Year (2016) with project conditions.
The peak hour volume at the connector intersections is low (see Figures 12 and 13) and they do not
satisfy the peak hour signal warrant (warrant 3). Hence, a signal is not recommended in the Opening
Year (2016) conditions.
FIGURE 12AM PEAK HOURPM PEAK HOURXX/YY- Major Street Volume/Minor Street Volume Platinum Gateway Lewis Street/Northerly Connector RoadSOURCE:CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, FIGURE 4C-3 Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak Hour Warrant(750, 214)(748, 114)0100200300400500600700400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800SIGNAL WARRANT 3 MAJOR STREETTOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPHMINOR STREETHIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor)2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor)OR 1 LANE (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor)1 LANE (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor)150 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanesand 100 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approaching with one lane.P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Traffic Warrant1 .xls (8/21/2012)
FIGURE 13AM PEAK HOURPM PEAK HOURXX/YY- Major Street Volume/Minor Street Volume Platinum Gateway Easterly Connector Road/East Katella AvenueSOURCE:CALIFORNIA MANUAL ON UNIFORM TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES, FIGURE 4C-3 Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Peak Hour Warrant0100200300400500600700400 500 600 700 800 900 1000 1100 1200 1300 1400 1500 1600 1700 1800SIGNAL WARRANT 3 MAJOR STREETTOTAL OF BOTH APPROACHES - VPHMINOR STREETHIGH VOLUME APPROACH - VPH2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor)2 OR MORE LANES (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor)OR 1 LANE (Major) & 2 OR MORE LANES (Minor)1 LANE (Major) & 1 LANE (Minor)150 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approach with two or more lanesand 100 VPH applies as the lower threshold volume for a minor street approaching with one lane.(3827, 91)(4212, 49)P:\SHP1201\xls\Gateway Graphics\Traffic Warrant2 .xls (8/21/2012)
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 29
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION ANALYSIS
According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of
Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002), LOS at an intersection is analyzed utilizing the Highway
Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology. Traffix Version 8.0 computer software was used to
determine the LOS at Caltrans intersections based on the HCM methodology. Based on Caltrans
traffic impact study guidelines, Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between
LOS C and LOS D on State highway facilities. However, Caltrans acknowledges that this may not
always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult with Caltrans to determine the
appropriate target LOS. The correlation between LOS and delay is presented below.
LOS HCM Signalized Intersections
A < 10.0 seconds
B > 10.0 and < 20.0 seconds
C > 20.0 and < 35.0 seconds
D > 35.0 and < 55.0 seconds
E > 55.0 and < 80.0 seconds
F > 80.0 seconds
Consistent with Caltrans methodology, intersection LOS at four State facilities were analyzed using
the HCM 2000 methodology for the existing, and opening year (2016) (with and without project)
conditions. The following study area intersections were included in this analysis:
• Manchester Avenue/I-5 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
• Anaheim Way/I-5 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
• SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
• SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
Table G summarizes the results of the existing, and opening year (2016) (with and without project)
a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for the signalized intersections identified above utilizing the
HCM methodology. The existing and opening year (2016) (with and without project) LOS calculation
worksheets, utilizing the HCM methodology, are contained in Appendix C.
Based on the Caltrans methodology, all State facilities are forecast to operate at LOS D or better in
the existing and opening year (2016) (with and without project) conditions.
RECOMMENDED CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS
Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed project, consisting of 399 apartments,
would exceed the City’s performance criteria at one study area intersections in the opening year
(2016) horizon. The following geometric improvements at the impacted study area intersections
would improve the ICU and/or reduce the ICU to the baseline condition. The LOS worksheets at each
location are provided in Appendix D.
LSA ASSOCIATES, INC.LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue B 16.5 B 13.3 B 17.3 B 14.22. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue B 15.5 B 18.9 B 15.5 B 18.96. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 16.3 B 14.8 B 16.4 B 15.17. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 17.3 A 9.6 B 17.3 A 9.4LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue B 18.9 B 19.4 B 19.6 C 20.12. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue B 14.8 B 19.1 B 14.8 B 19.26. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 15.0 B 18.5 B 15.0 B 18.77. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue B 17.0 A 7.6 B 16.9 A 7.9Notes:HCM Delay ratio is used for signalized intersections in the City of Anaheim. Significant ImpactLevel of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study.Table G: Caltrans Methodology Level of Service SummaryAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourOpening Year No Project ConditionsIntersectionOpening Year Plus Project ConditionsAM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak HourIntersectionExisting Conditions Existing Plus Project ConditionsP:\SHP1201\LOS\LOS Tables_UPDATED.xls\GATEWAY HCM(9/25/2012)
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12» 31
Opening Year (2016) Conditions
Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The proposed project will increase the LOS at the intersection from
LOS C to LOS D with an ICU increase of greater than 0.03 at LOS D in the a.m. peak and from LOS
D to LOS E with an ICU increase of greater than 0.01 in p.m. peak hour during the Opening Year
(2016) condition.
The addition of a fourth lane in the westbound direction would offset the project’s impact at this
intersection during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The recommended improvement will decrease the
Opening Year (2016) ICU and LOS from 0.82 (LOS D) to 0.720 (LOS C) in the a.m. peak hour and
LOS from 0.94 (LOS E) to 0.79 (LOS C) in the p.m. peak hour. Widening Katella Avenue to its
ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will provide the additional westbound
through lane at the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The widening of Katella Avenue (4
lanes in the westbound direction) is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum
Triangle master plan improvements and is funded by the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities
District (CFD). The construction of this widening project will begin in the first quarter of 2013 and is
scheduled to complete in 9 months.
CONCLUSION
Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed development of 399 apartments can
be implemented and continue to maintain satisfactory mobility and circulation system performance.
Evaluation of intersection LOS shows that the addition of the project traffic to the opening year
(2016) baseline traffic volumes will significantly impact the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella
Avenue, according to the City’s performance criteria. The widening of Katella Avenue to its ultimate
planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will mitigate the project impacts. Widening of
Katella Avenue is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan
improvements which will be constructed before the construction of the project.
The internal intersections along the easterly connector road do not satisfy multiway stop control
criteria. Stop sign should only be installed at the project accesses and the traffic along easterly
connector should be uncontrolled. Also, the intersections of the northerly connector with Lewis Street
and easterly connector with Katella Avenue do not satisfy peak hour traffic signal warrants. Hence,
traffic signals are not recommended at these locations and the connector approaches should be
controlled by a stop sign.
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12»
APPENDIX A
EXISTING TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12»
APPENDIX B
ICU LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
Intersection Number: 1
North/South Roadway: Manchester Avenue
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.5 2,550 43 48 0.02 *0.02 *1.5 2,550 43 48 0.02 *0.02 *
NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
NBR 1.5 2,550 433 168 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 441 200 0.00 0.00
SBL 2.0 3,400 47 33 0.01 0.01 2.0 3,400 47 33 0.01 0.01
SBT 2.0 3,400 151 71 0.04 *0.02 *2.0 3,400 151 71 0.04 *0.02 *
SBR 1.0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00
EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,136 790 0.22 *0.15 3.0 5,100 1,138 798 0.22 *0.16
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 626 402 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 626 402 0.00 0.00
WBL 2.0 3,400 161 409 0.05 *0.12 2.0 3,400 202 431 0.06 *0.13
WBT 3.0 5,100 832 1,592 0.16 0.31 *3.0 5,100 840 1,597 0.16 0.31 *
WBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.06 0.04 0.06 0.04
E/W Critical Movements 0.27 0.31 0.28 0.31
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.38 0.40 ICU 0.39 0.40
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.5 2,550 46 51 0.02 *0.02 *1.5 2,550 46 51 0.02 *0.02 *
NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
NBR 1.5 0 2,550 539 479 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 547 511 0.00 0.00
SBL 2.0 3,400 52 35 0.02 0.01 2.0 3,400 52 35 0.02 0.01
SBT 2.0 3,400 160 75 0.05 *0.02 *2.0 3,400 160 75 0.05 *0.02 *
SBR 1.0 0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 4 6 0.00 0.00
EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,362 1,148 0.27 *0.23 3.0 5,100 1,364 1,156 0.27 *0.23
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 664 427 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 664 427 0.00 0.00
WBL 2.0 3,400 259 492 0.08 *0.14 2.0 3,400 300 514 0.09 *0.15
WBT 3.0 5,100 1,164 1,970 0.23 0.39 *3.0 5,100 1,172 1,975 0.23 0.39 *
WBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.07 0.04 0.07 0.04
E/W Critical Movements 0.35 0.39 0.36 0.39
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.47 0.48 ICU 0.48 0.48
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Intersection Number: 2
North/South Roadway: Anaheim Avenue
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.5 2,550 384 674 0.15 *0.26 *1.5 2,550 384 674 0.15 *0.26 *
NBT 3.0 5,100 359 858 0.07 0.17 3.0 5,100 359 858 0.07 0.17
NBR 0.5 850 246 102 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 253 127 0.00 0.00
SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *
SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
EBL 2.0 3,400 64 104 0.02 0.03 *2.0 3,400 64 104 0.02 0.03 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,615 905 0.32 *0.18 3.0 5,100 1,625 945 0.32 *0.19
EBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00
WBT 3.5 5,950 882 1,840 0.15 0.31 *3.5 5,950 931 1,867 0.16 0.31 *
WBR 1.5 0 2,550 58 91 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 91 108 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.15 0.26 0.15 0.26
E/W Critical Movements 0.32 0.34 0.32 0.34
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.52 0.65 ICU 0.52 0.65
Level of Service (LOS) A B Level of Service (LOS) A B
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.5 2,550 408 715 0.16 *0.28 *1.5 2,550 408 715 0.16 *0.28 *
NBT 3.0 5,100 381 911 0.07 0.18 3.0 5,100 381 911 0.07 0.18
NBR 0.5 0 850 267 225 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 274 250 0.00 0.00
SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *
SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
EBL 2.0 3,400 68 110 0.02 0.03 *2.0 3,400 68 110 0.02 0.03 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,954 1,526 0.38 *0.30 3.0 5,100 1,964 1,566 0.39 *0.31
EBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00
WBT 3.5 5,950 1,327 2,301 0.22 0.39 *3.5 5,950 1,376 2,328 0.23 0.39 *
WBR 1.5 0 2,550 304 297 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 337 314 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.16 0.28 0.16 0.28
E/W Critical Movements 0.38 0.42 0.39 0.42
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.59 0.75 ICU 0.60 0.75
Level of Service (LOS) A C Level of Service (LOS) A C
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Intersection Number: 3
North/South Roadway: Lewis Street
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02
NBT 0.5 850 36 66 0.04 *0.08 *0.5 850 40 82 0.05 *0.10 *
NBR 0.5 850 13 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 13 9 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.0 1,700 59 104 0.03 *0.06 *1.0 1,700 132 143 0.08 *0.08 *
SBT 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01
SBR 1.0 1,700 160 246 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 201 268 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 10 131 0.01 0.08 *1.0 1,700 27 196 0.02 0.12 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 *0.20 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 *0.20
EBR 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00
WBL 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 *0.01 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 *0.01
WBT 2.5 4,250 802 1,542 0.19 0.36 *2.5 4,250 843 1,564 0.20 0.37 *
WBR 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.07 0.14 0.13 0.18
E/W Critical Movements 0.34 0.44 0.34 0.49
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.46 0.63 ICU 0.52 0.67
Level of Service (LOS) A B Level of Service (LOS) A B
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02
NBT 0.5 850 38 69 0.04 *0.08 *0.5 850 42 85 0.05 *0.10 *
NBR 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.0 1,700 155 159 0.09 *0.09 *1.0 1,700 228 198 0.13 *0.12 *
SBT 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01
SBR 1.0 0 1,700 168 258 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 209 280 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 378 188 0.22 *0.11 *1.0 1,700 395 253 0.23 *0.15 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37
EBR 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00
WBL 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01
WBT 2.5 4,250 1,480 2,167 0.35 *0.51 *2.5 4,250 1,521 2,189 0.36 *0.52 *
WBR 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.22
E/W Critical Movements 0.57 0.62 0.59 0.67
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.75 0.84 ICU 0.82 0.94
Level of Service (LOS) C D Level of Service (LOS) D E
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Intersection Number: 4
North/South Roadway: State College Blvd
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 2.0 3,400 74 114 0.02 *0.03 2.0 3,400 76 122 0.02 *0.04
NBT 2.5 4,250 395 881 0.09 0.21 *3.0 5,100 395 881 0.11 0.23 *
NBR 0.5 850 147 296 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 147 296 0.00 0.00
SBL 2.0 3,400 82 107 0.02 0.03 *2.0 3,400 82 107 0.02 0.03 *
SBT 3.0 5,100 869 722 0.17 *0.14 3.0 5,100 869 722 0.17 *0.14
SBR 1.0 1,700 97 266 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 99 274 0.00 0.00
EBL 2.0 3,400 264 160 0.08 0.05 *2.0 3,400 272 164 0.08 0.05 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 916 718 0.22 *0.17 2.5 4,250 973 749 0.23 *0.18
EBR 1.5 0 2,550 204 84 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 212 88 0.00 0.00
WBL 2.0 3,400 384 240 0.11 *0.07 2.0 3,400 384 240 0.11 *0.07
WBT 3.0 5,100 523 1,264 0.10 0.25 *3.0 5,100 537 1,320 0.11 0.26 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 66 64 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 66 64 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.19 0.24 0.19 0.26
E/W Critical Movements 0.33 0.30 0.34 0.31
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.57 0.59 ICU 0.58 0.62
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A B
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 2.0 3,400 247 565 0.07 *0.17 *2.0 3,400 249 573 0.07 *0.17 *
NBT 3.0 5,100 535 1,044 0.15 0.27 3.0 5,100 535 1,044 0.15 0.27
NBR 0.0 0 218 340 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 218 340 0.00 0.00
SBL 2.0 3,400 139 135 0.04 0.04 2.0 3,400 139 135 0.04 0.04
SBT 3.0 5,100 1,050 922 0.21 *0.18 *3.0 5,100 1,050 922 0.21 *0.18 *
SBR 1.0 0 1,700 120 351 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 122 359 0.00 0.00
EBL 2.0 3,400 403 286 0.12 0.08 *2.0 3,400 411 290 0.12 0.09 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 1,349 1,092 0.32 *0.26 2.5 4,250 1,406 1,123 0.33 *0.26
EBR 1.5 0 2,550 554 328 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 562 332 0.00 0.00
WBL 2.0 3,400 458 420 0.13 *0.12 2.0 3,400 458 420 0.13 *0.12
WBT 3.0 5,100 683 1,790 0.13 0.35 *3.0 5,100 697 1,846 0.14 0.36 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 88 68 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 88 68 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.28 0.35 0.28 0.35
E/W Critical Movements 0.45 0.43 0.46 0.45
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.78 0.83 ICU 0.79 0.85
Level of Service (LOS) C D Level of Service (LOS) C D
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Intersection Number: 5
North/South Roadway: Sportstown Avenue
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 31 50 0.02 *0.03 1.0 1,700 31 50 0.02 *0.03
NBT 0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 *0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 *
NBR 1.5 2,550 26 46 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 26 46 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.0 1,700 35 134 0.02 0.08 *1.0 1,700 35 134 0.02 0.08 *
SBT 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 *0.00 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 *0.00
SBR 1.0 1,700 64 91 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 64 91 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 36 25 0.02 0.01 *1.0 1,700 36 25 0.02 0.01 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 981 903 0.19 *0.18 3.0 5,100 1,038 934 0.20 *0.18
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 50 42 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 50 42 0.00 0.00
WBL 1.0 1,700 38 14 0.02 *0.01 1.0 1,700 38 14 0.02 *0.01
WBT 3.0 5,100 933 1,292 0.18 0.25 *3.0 5,100 947 1,348 0.19 0.26 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 134 96 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 134 96 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08
E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.26 0.22 0.27
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.28 0.39 ICU 0.29 0.40
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 32 52 0.02 *0.03 1.0 1,700 32 52 0.02 *0.03
NBT 0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 *0.5 850 0 0 0.00 0.00 *
NBR 1.5 0 2,550 27 48 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 27 48 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.0 1,700 37 142 0.02 0.08 *1.0 1,700 37 142 0.02 0.08 *
SBT 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 *0.00 1.0 1,700 5 1 0.00 *0.00
SBR 1.0 0 1,700 67 96 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 67 96 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 119 49 0.07 0.03 *1.0 1,700 119 49 0.07 0.03 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,603 1,309 0.31 *0.26 3.0 5,100 1,660 1,340 0.33 *0.26
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 52 44 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 52 44 0.00 0.00
WBL 1.0 1,700 40 15 0.02 *0.01 1.0 1,700 40 15 0.02 *0.01
WBT 3.0 5,100 1,086 1,976 0.21 0.39 *3.0 5,100 1,100 2,032 0.22 0.40 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 141 101 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 141 101 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.02 0.08 0.02 0.08
E/W Critical Movements 0.33 0.42 0.35 0.43
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.40 0.55 ICU 0.42 0.56
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Intersection Number: 6
North/South Roadway: SR-55 Southbound Ramps
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *
NBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.5 2,550 220 212 0.09 *0.08 *1.5 2,550 220 212 0.09 *0.08 *
SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBR 1.5 2,550 518 426 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 524 450 0.00 0.00
EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,023 1,082 0.20 0.21 3.0 5,100 1,064 1,104 0.21 0.22
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 229 421 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 245 440 0.00 0.00
WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
WBT 3.0 5,100 1,054 1,065 0.21 *0.21 *3.0 5,100 1,062 1,097 0.21 *0.22 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 157 475 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 157 475 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.09 0.08 0.09 0.08
E/W Critical Movements 0.21 0.21 0.21 0.22
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.35 0.34 ICU 0.35 0.35
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *
NBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.5 2,550 231 223 0.09 *0.09 *1.5 2,550 231 223 0.09 *0.09 *
SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBR 1.5 0 2,550 579 759 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 585 783 0.00 0.00
EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,699 1,415 0.33 *0.28 3.0 5,100 1,740 1,437 0.34 *0.28
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 376 523 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 392 542 0.00 0.00
WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00
WBT 3.0 5,100 1,175 1,420 0.23 0.28 *3.0 5,100 1,183 1,452 0.23 0.28 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 165 499 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 165 499 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.09 0.09 0.09 0.09
E/W Critical Movements 0.33 0.28 0.34 0.28
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.47 0.42 ICU 0.48 0.42
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Intersection Number: 7
North/South Roadway: SR-55 Northbound Ramps
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.5 2,550 452 202 0.18 *0.08 *1.5 2,550 456 218 0.18 *0.09 *
NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
NBR 1.5 2,550 532 245 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 532 245 0.00 0.00
SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *
SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 964 872 0.19 *0.17 3.0 5,100 981 881 0.19 *0.17
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 259 429 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 283 442 0.00 0.00
WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00
WBT 3.0 5,100 864 1,337 0.17 0.26 *3.0 5,100 868 1,353 0.17 0.27 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 170 399 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 170 399 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.18 0.08 0.18 0.09
E/W Critical Movements 0.19 0.26 0.19 0.27
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.42 0.39 ICU 0.42 0.41
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.5 2,550 502 213 0.20 *0.08 *1.5 2,550 506 229 0.20 *0.09 *
NBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
NBR 1.5 0 2,550 565 163 0.00 0.00 1.5 0 2,550 565 163 0.00 0.00
SBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
SBT 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 *
SBR 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00
EBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *0.0 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 *
EBT 3.0 5,100 1,241 941 0.24 *0.18 3.0 5,100 1,258 950 0.25 *0.19
EBR 1.0 0 1,700 668 500 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 692 513 0.00 0.00
WBL 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00 0.0 0 0 0 0.00 *0.00
WBT 3.0 5,100 948 1,661 0.19 0.33 *3.0 5,100 952 1,677 0.19 0.33 *
WBR 1.0 0 1,700 179 306 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 179 306 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.20 0.08 0.20 0.09
E/W Critical Movements 0.24 0.33 0.25 0.33
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.49 0.46 ICU 0.50 0.47
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
Intersection Number: 8
North/South Roadway: Howell
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 23 106 0.01 0.06 1.0 1,700 23 106 0.01 0.06
NBT 1.0 1,700 27 36 0.02 *0.02 *1.0 1,700 27 36 0.02 *0.02 *
NBR 1.0 1,700 43 192 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 43 192 0.00 0.00
SBL 2.0 3,400 251 307 0.07 *0.09 *2.0 3,400 251 307 0.07 *0.09 *
SBT 0.5 850 57 16 0.07 0.02 0.5 850 57 16 0.07 0.02
SBR 0.5 850 72 101 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 72 101 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 70 44 0.04 0.03 *1.0 1,700 70 44 0.04 0.03 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 1,076 1,069 0.25 *0.25 2.5 4,250 1,133 1,100 0.27 *0.26
EBR 0.5 0 850 93 56 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 93 56 0.00 0.00
WBL 2.0 3,400 207 86 0.06 *0.03 2.0 3,400 207 86 0.06 *0.03
WBT 2.5 4,250 994 1,291 0.23 0.30 *2.5 4,250 1,008 1,347 0.24 0.32 *
WBR 0.5 0 850 460 171 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 460 171 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.09 0.11 0.09 0.11
E/W Critical Movements 0.31 0.33 0.33 0.35
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.45 0.49 ICU 0.47 0.51
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A A
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 27 115 0.02 0.07 1.0 1,700 27 115 0.02 0.07
NBT 1.0 1,700 29 38 0.02 *0.02 *1.0 1,700 29 38 0.02 *0.02 *
NBR 1.0 0 1,700 75 204 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 75 204 0.00 0.00
SBL 2.0 3,400 431 326 0.13 *0.10 *2.0 3,400 431 326 0.13 *0.10 *
SBT 0.5 850 60 17 0.07 0.02 0.5 850 60 17 0.07 0.02
SBR 0.5 0 850 77 110 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 77 110 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 74 47 0.04 0.03 *1.0 1,700 74 47 0.04 0.03 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 1,708 1,494 0.40 *0.35 2.5 4,250 1,765 1,525 0.42 *0.36
EBR 0.5 0 850 99 59 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 99 59 0.00 0.00
WBL 2.0 3,400 220 91 0.06 *0.03 2.0 3,400 220 91 0.06 *0.03
WBT 2.5 4,250 1,157 1,982 0.27 0.47 *2.5 4,250 1,171 2,038 0.28 0.48 *
WBR 0.5 0 850 488 181 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 488 181 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.15 0.12 0.15 0.12
E/W Critical Movements 0.46 0.50 0.48 0.51
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.66 0.67 ICU 0.68 0.68
Level of Service (LOS) B B Level of Service (LOS) B B
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12»
APPENDIX C
CALTRANS METHODOLOGY
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing AMCommand: ExistingVolume: Existing AMGeometry: ExistingImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.617Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.5Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 0 433 47 151 4 0 1136 626 161 832 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.09 0.00 1.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1781 0 3119 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.39 0.05 0.16 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.00 0.23 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.07 0.70 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.27 0.02 0.00 0.35 0.62 0.62 0.23 0.00 Uniform Del: 42.4 0.0 34.9 48.5 37.1 35.7 0.0 8.8 11.3 44.9 5.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 1.5 14.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.2 4.4 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.4 62.8 37.4 35.7 0.0 8.9 12.4 49.3 5.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.4 62.8 37.4 35.7 0.0 8.9 12.4 49.3 5.3 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D D A A B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 7 2 2 0 0 6 12 3 3 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.493Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.5Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 384 359 246 0 0 0 64 1615 0 0 882 58 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.83 0.83 0.83 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3137 3137 1568 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6854 1713 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.11 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.13 0.03 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.08 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.36 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.06 Uniform Del: 26.5 26.2 27.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.2 9.8 0.0 0.0 11.5 10.3 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.6 26.3 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 10.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.6 26.3 27.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.7 10.0 0.0 0.0 11.5 10.3 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D A A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 7 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 4 1 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:42 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.405Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.3Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 229 0 1054 157 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 229 0 1054 157 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 229 0 1054 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 0 0 1054 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 0 0 1054 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 220 0 518 0 1023 0 0 1054 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 1.70 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2174 0 2851 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.6 0.0 15.5 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 0.0 18.7 0.0 15.6 0.0 0.0 15.7 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A B A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing AM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:12:43 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.408Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.3Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 259 0 864 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 259 0 864 170 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 259 0 864 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 0 0 864 170 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 0 0 864 170 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 452 0 532 0 0 0 0 964 0 0 864 170 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.46 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2492 0 2631 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.50 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.45 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.23 Uniform Del: 15.6 0.0 16.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 17.8 16.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 15.7 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 0.0 17.9 16.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.7 0.0 16.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.4 0.0 0.0 17.9 16.8 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:39 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing PMCommand: ExistingVolume: Existing PMGeometry: ExistingImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Existing Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.455Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 13.3Optimal Cycle: 23 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 402 409 1592 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 402 409 1592 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 402 409 1592 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 402 409 1592 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 402 409 1592 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 0 168 33 71 6 0 790 402 409 1592 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.22 0.00 1.78 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 2028 0 2950 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 0.12 0.31 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.08 0.00 0.13 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.55 0.55 0.26 0.80 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.30 0.00 0.45 0.45 0.30 0.06 0.00 0.28 0.45 0.45 0.38 0.00 Uniform Del: 43.4 0.0 40.6 48.4 44.5 43.8 0.0 12.1 13.6 31.3 2.8 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.0 0.7 4.5 0.7 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 43.6 0.0 41.3 52.9 45.2 44.0 0.0 12.1 14.0 31.6 2.8 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 43.6 0.0 41.3 52.9 45.2 44.0 0.0 12.1 14.0 31.6 2.8 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D D D D A B B C A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 3 1 1 0 0 5 8 5 5 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.534Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9Optimal Cycle: 26 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 674 858 102 0 0 0 104 905 0 0 1840 91 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.85 0.85 0.85 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.68 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3214 4309 512 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6868 1717 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.53 0.51 0.51 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.11 Uniform Del: 23.3 23.0 23.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.0 13.1 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.1 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 2.9 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 23.5 23.2 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.8 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.1 13.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.5 23.2 23.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 48.8 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.1 13.1 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 9 8 8 0 0 0 2 5 0 0 10 2 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.376Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.8Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 421 0 1065 475 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 421 0 1065 475 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 421 0 1065 475 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 0 0 1065 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 0 0 1065 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 212 0 426 0 1082 0 0 1065 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.89 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.33 0.00 1.67 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2242 0 2806 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.15 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.55 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.38 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.6 0.0 21.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 21.1 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.7 0.0 21.1 0.0 13.1 0.0 0.0 13.0 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing PM Mon Sep 24, 2012 10:13:40 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.369Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.6Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 429 0 1337 399 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 429 0 1337 399 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 429 0 1337 399 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 0 0 1337 399 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 0 0 1337 399 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 202 0 245 0 0 0 0 872 0 0 1337 399 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.45 0.00 1.55 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2477 0 2641 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.25 0.00 0.25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.00 0.00 0.70 0.70 Volume/Cap: 0.32 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.35 Uniform Del: 30.5 0.0 30.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 6.1 6.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 30.6 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 30.6 0.0 31.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.5 0.0 0.0 6.2 6.2 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:29 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing Plus Project AMCommand: Existing Plus ProjectVolume: Existing plus project AMGeometry: ExistingImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Existing Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.632Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.3Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 43 0 441 47 151 4 0 1138 626 202 840 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.09 0.00 1.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1778 0 3121 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.14 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.39 0.06 0.16 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.00 0.22 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.61 0.61 0.09 0.71 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.63 0.63 0.27 0.02 0.00 0.36 0.63 0.63 0.23 0.00 Uniform Del: 42.5 0.0 35.1 48.5 37.2 35.8 0.0 9.6 12.2 43.8 5.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 1.7 16.3 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 1.3 4.1 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.8 64.8 37.5 35.8 0.0 9.6 13.5 47.9 5.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.5 0.0 36.8 64.8 37.5 35.8 0.0 9.6 13.5 47.9 5.2 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D D A A B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 7 2 2 0 0 6 13 3 3 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.500Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.5Optimal Cycle: 25 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 384 359 253 0 0 0 64 1625 0 0 931 91 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3134 3134 1567 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6826 1707 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.12 0.11 0.16 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.31 0.00 0.00 0.14 0.05 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.32 0.32 0.32 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.07 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.55 0.55 Volume/Cap: 0.38 0.35 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.25 0.10 Uniform Del: 26.1 25.9 27.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 43.7 10.1 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.6 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.2 26.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.2 26.0 27.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 44.2 10.3 0.0 0.0 11.6 10.6 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 5 5 7 0 0 0 1 10 0 0 4 1 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.409Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.4Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 245 0 1062 157 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 245 0 1062 157 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 245 0 1062 157 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 0 0 1062 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 0 0 1062 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 220 0 524 0 1064 0 0 1062 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.30 0.00 1.70 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2168 0 2852 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.6 0.0 15.7 0.0 0.0 15.6 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.8 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.9 0.0 18.8 0.0 15.8 0.0 0.0 15.8 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A B A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:56:30 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.412Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.3Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 283 0 868 170 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 283 0 868 170 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 283 0 868 170 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 0 0 868 170 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 0 0 868 170 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 456 0 532 0 0 0 0 981 0 0 868 170 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.46 0.00 1.54 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2493 0 2625 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.18 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.49 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.46 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.23 Uniform Del: 15.8 0.0 16.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.1 0.0 0.0 17.6 16.4 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 15.9 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 17.7 16.5 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 15.9 0.0 16.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 17.7 16.5 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 0 7 0 0 0 0 7 0 0 6 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:06 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Existing Plus Project PMCommand: Existing Plus ProjectVolume: Existing plus project PMGeometry: ExistingImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Existing Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.472Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.2Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 402 431 1597 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 402 431 1597 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 402 431 1597 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 402 431 1597 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 402 431 1597 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 48 0 200 33 71 6 0 798 402 431 1597 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.87 1.00 0.87 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.19 0.00 1.81 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1973 0 2987 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.02 0.00 0.07 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.15 0.25 0.12 0.31 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.09 0.00 0.14 0.02 0.07 0.07 0.00 0.53 0.53 0.26 0.79 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.47 0.47 0.27 0.05 0.00 0.29 0.47 0.47 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 42.5 0.0 39.5 48.5 43.9 43.2 0.0 13.2 14.9 31.2 3.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.0 0.7 5.0 0.6 0.2 0.0 0.1 0.4 0.4 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 42.6 0.0 40.1 53.4 44.5 43.4 0.0 13.3 15.3 31.5 3.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 42.6 0.0 40.1 53.4 44.5 43.4 0.0 13.3 15.3 31.5 3.3 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D D D D A B B C A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 4 1 1 0 0 5 8 6 5 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.539Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9Optimal Cycle: 27 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 674 858 127 0 0 0 104 945 0 0 1867 108 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.90 0.90 Lanes: 2.00 2.61 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3208 4192 620 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6861 1715 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.21 0.20 0.20 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.06 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.39 0.39 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.51 0.51 Volume/Cap: 0.54 0.53 0.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.12 Uniform Del: 23.6 23.4 23.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.0 11.8 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.1 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.2 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 23.8 23.6 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.0 13.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 23.8 23.6 23.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 49.0 11.9 0.0 0.0 17.0 13.1 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 9 9 9 0 0 0 2 6 0 0 10 2 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.391Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.1Optimal Cycle: 21 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 440 0 1097 475 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 440 0 1097 475 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 440 0 1097 475 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 0 0 1097 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 0 0 1097 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 212 0 450 0 1104 0 0 1097 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.32 0.00 1.68 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2217 0 2820 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.10 0.00 0.16 0.00 0.21 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.41 0.00 0.54 0.00 0.00 0.54 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.39 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.3 0.0 20.8 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.3 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 21.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 21.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 0.0 13.4 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 7 0 0 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Existing Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:07 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.366Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 9.4Optimal Cycle: 20 Level Of Service: A********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 442 0 1353 399 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 442 0 1353 399 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 442 0 1353 399 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 0 0 1353 399 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 0 0 1353 399 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 218 0 245 0 0 0 0 881 0 0 1353 399 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.47 0.00 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2515 0 2614 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.09 0.00 0.09 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.25 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.24 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.00 0.00 0.71 0.71 Volume/Cap: 0.37 0.00 0.40 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.35 Uniform Del: 31.9 0.0 32.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.5 IncremntDel: 0.2 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.2 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 32.1 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.7 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 32.1 0.0 32.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.0 0.0 0.0 5.6 5.7 LOS by Move: C A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 6 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Future No Project AMCommand: FutureVolume: Future AMGeometry: FutureImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Future Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.707Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.9Optimal Cycle: 40 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 664 259 1164 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 664 259 1164 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 664 259 1164 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 664 259 1164 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 664 259 1164 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 46 0 539 52 160 4 0 1362 664 259 1164 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.08 0.00 1.92 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1760 0 3134 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.07 0.22 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.00 0.24 0.02 0.17 0.17 0.00 0.58 0.58 0.10 0.69 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.71 0.71 0.27 0.01 0.00 0.45 0.71 0.71 0.33 0.00 Uniform Del: 41.8 0.0 34.6 48.6 36.4 34.9 0.0 11.9 14.9 43.3 6.4 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 2.8 27.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.5 6.2 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 41.8 0.0 37.4 75.7 36.6 34.9 0.0 12.0 17.4 49.5 6.4 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.8 0.0 37.4 75.7 36.6 34.9 0.0 12.0 17.4 49.5 6.4 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D C A B B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 9 2 2 0 0 9 15 4 5 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.576Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.8Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 408 381 267 0 0 0 68 1954 0 0 1327 304 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3134 3134 1567 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6722 1681 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.12 0.17 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.20 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.60 0.60 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.41 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.33 0.30 Uniform Del: 28.5 28.2 29.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.2 9.6 0.0 0.0 10.2 10.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 28.6 28.3 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 10.2 10.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.6 28.3 30.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.1 9.8 0.0 0.0 10.2 10.0 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D A A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 5 8 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 5 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.557Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.0Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 376 0 1175 165 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 376 0 1175 165 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 376 0 1175 165 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 0 0 1175 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 0 0 1175 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 231 0 579 0 1699 0 0 1175 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.29 0.00 1.71 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2150 0 2869 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.33 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 25.5 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 11.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 26.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.8 0.0 26.0 0.0 12.9 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A C A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 11 0 0 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:21 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.479Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 17.0Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 668 0 948 179 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 668 0 948 179 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 668 0 948 179 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 0 0 948 179 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 0 0 948 179 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 502 0 565 0 0 0 0 1241 0 0 948 179 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.47 0.00 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2514 0 2615 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.44 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.22 Uniform Del: 18.8 0.0 19.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 14.1 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 19.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 15.4 14.2 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 19.0 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.6 0.0 0.0 15.4 14.2 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:44 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Future No Project PMCommand: FutureVolume: Future PMGeometry: FutureImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Future Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.599Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.4Optimal Cycle: 30 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 427 492 1970 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 427 492 1970 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 427 492 1970 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 427 492 1970 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 427 492 1970 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 0 479 35 75 6 0 1148 427 492 1970 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.10 0.00 1.90 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1791 0 3110 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.15 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.26 0.14 0.38 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.00 0.26 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.44 0.44 0.23 0.68 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.18 0.00 0.60 0.60 0.18 0.03 0.00 0.50 0.60 0.60 0.56 0.00 Uniform Del: 36.5 0.0 32.6 48.8 39.9 39.3 0.0 20.0 21.2 34.1 8.5 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 1.1 16.0 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.4 1.2 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 36.5 0.0 33.8 64.8 40.2 39.3 0.0 20.2 22.6 35.3 8.7 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.5 0.0 33.8 64.8 40.2 39.3 0.0 20.2 22.6 35.3 8.7 0.0 LOS by Move: D A C E D D A C C D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 8 1 1 0 0 9 10 7 11 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.633Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.1Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 715 911 225 0 0 0 110 1526 0 0 2301 297 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.93 2.46 0.61 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3089 3936 972 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6798 1700 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.17 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.63 0.63 0.63 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.63 0.33 Uniform Del: 26.2 26.2 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.6 12.2 0.0 0.0 16.4 13.1 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 7.4 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.6 26.6 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 16.7 13.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.6 26.6 26.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.0 12.4 0.0 0.0 16.7 13.1 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 11 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 13 5 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.559Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.5Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 523 0 1420 499 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 523 0 1420 499 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 523 0 1420 499 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 0 0 1420 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 0 0 1420 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 223 0 759 0 1415 0 0 1420 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.23 0.00 1.77 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2038 0 2945 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.26 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.00 0.27 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.56 0.00 0.00 0.56 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 19.6 0.0 17.9 0.0 0.0 18.0 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 20.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 20.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 10 0 11 0 0 11 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future No Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:57:45 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.420Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.6Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: A********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 500 0 1661 306 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 500 0 1661 306 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 500 0 1661 306 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 0 0 1661 306 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 0 0 1661 306 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 213 0 163 0 0 0 0 941 0 0 1661 306 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.57 0.00 1.43 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2705 0 2475 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 Volume/Cap: 0.42 0.00 0.35 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.42 0.25 Uniform Del: 35.8 0.0 35.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.4 0.0 0.0 4.1 3.5 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 36.1 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 4.2 3.6 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.1 0.0 35.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 0.0 4.2 3.6 LOS by Move: D A D A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Future Plus Project AMCommand: Future Plus ProjectVolume: Future plus project AMGeometry: FutureImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Future Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.722Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.6Optimal Cycle: 41 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 664 300 1172 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 664 300 1172 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 664 300 1172 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 664 300 1172 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 664 300 1172 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 46 0 547 52 160 4 0 1364 664 300 1172 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.08 0.00 1.92 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1758 0 3136 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.17 0.01 0.04 0.00 0.00 0.26 0.41 0.09 0.23 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.10 0.00 0.24 0.02 0.16 0.16 0.00 0.57 0.57 0.12 0.69 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.27 0.00 0.72 0.72 0.27 0.02 0.00 0.46 0.72 0.72 0.33 0.00 Uniform Del: 41.8 0.0 34.8 48.7 36.5 35.0 0.0 12.6 15.8 42.5 6.3 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 3.2 29.9 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.1 2.8 6.1 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 41.9 0.0 38.0 78.6 36.7 35.0 0.0 12.7 18.6 48.6 6.3 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 41.9 0.0 38.0 78.6 36.7 35.0 0.0 12.7 18.6 48.6 6.3 0.0 LOS by Move: D A D E D C A B B D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 9 2 2 0 0 9 16 5 5 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.583Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 14.8Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 408 381 274 0 0 0 68 1964 0 0 1376 337 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.82 0.82 0.82 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.88 0.88 Lanes: 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3130 3130 1565 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6709 1677 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.13 0.12 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.02 0.38 0.00 0.00 0.21 0.20 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.06 0.65 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.59 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.41 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.35 0.34 Uniform Del: 28.1 27.9 29.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 45.4 9.9 0.0 0.0 10.4 10.3 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 1.1 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 28.3 28.0 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.5 10.1 0.0 0.0 10.4 10.4 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 28.3 28.0 30.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.5 10.1 0.0 0.0 10.4 10.4 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 6 5 8 0 0 0 1 12 0 0 6 6 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.568Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 15.0Optimal Cycle: 28 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 392 0 1183 165 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 392 0 1183 165 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 392 0 1183 165 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 0 0 1183 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 0 0 1183 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 231 0 585 0 1740 0 0 1183 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.88 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.28 0.00 1.72 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2144 0 2869 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.23 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.36 0.00 0.59 0.00 0.00 0.59 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.30 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.39 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.0 0.0 25.8 0.0 12.6 0.0 0.0 10.8 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 26.3 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 23.1 0.0 26.3 0.0 12.8 0.0 0.0 10.9 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A C A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 4 0 9 0 12 0 0 7 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project AM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:02 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.483Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 16.9Optimal Cycle: 24 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 692 0 952 179 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 692 0 952 179 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 692 0 952 179 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 0 0 952 179 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 0 0 952 179 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 506 0 565 0 0 0 0 1258 0 0 952 179 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.90 1.00 0.90 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.47 0.00 1.53 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2517 0 2612 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.20 0.00 0.22 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.11 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.45 0.00 0.45 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.00 0.00 0.50 0.50 Volume/Cap: 0.45 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.48 0.00 0.00 0.37 0.22 Uniform Del: 19.1 0.0 19.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.4 0.0 0.0 15.2 13.9 IncremntDel: 0.1 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 19.2 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 14.1 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 19.2 0.0 19.6 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.5 0.0 0.0 15.3 14.1 LOS by Move: B A B A A A A B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 7 0 8 0 0 0 0 9 0 0 6 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:29 Page 1-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario Report Scenario: Future Plus Project PMCommand: Future Plus ProjectVolume: Future plus project PMGeometry: FutureImpact Fee: Default Impact FeeTrip Generation: NoneTrip Distribution: NonePaths: Default PathRoutes: Default RouteConfiguration: Future Plus Project Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 2-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #1 Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.616Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 20.1Optimal Cycle: 31 Level Of Service: C********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 2 0 2 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 2 0 3 0 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 427 514 1975 0 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 427 514 1975 0 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 427 514 1975 0 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 427 514 1975 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 427 514 1975 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 51 0 511 35 75 6 0 1156 427 514 1975 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.86 1.00 0.86 0.92 0.95 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 0.92 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 1.09 0.00 1.91 2.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 Final Sat.: 1782 0 3119 3502 3610 1615 0 5187 1615 3502 5187 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.03 0.00 0.16 0.01 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.22 0.26 0.15 0.38 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.16 0.00 0.27 0.02 0.12 0.12 0.00 0.43 0.43 0.24 0.67 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.17 0.00 0.62 0.62 0.17 0.03 0.00 0.52 0.62 0.62 0.57 0.00 Uniform Del: 36.0 0.0 32.2 48.9 39.7 39.0 0.0 21.0 22.1 34.0 8.9 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 1.3 18.6 0.2 0.1 0.0 0.2 1.7 1.4 0.2 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 36.0 0.0 33.5 67.5 39.9 39.0 0.0 21.2 23.8 35.4 9.1 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 36.0 0.0 33.5 67.5 39.9 39.0 0.0 21.2 23.8 35.4 9.1 0.0 LOS by Move: D A C E D D A C C D A A HCM2kAvgQ: 1 0 8 1 1 0 0 10 11 7 12 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 3-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #2 Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.641Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 19.2Optimal Cycle: 33 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Include Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 1 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 1 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 715 911 250 0 0 0 110 1566 0 0 2328 314 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.84 0.84 0.84 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.92 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.89 0.89 Lanes: 1.90 2.43 0.67 0.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 4.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 3045 3880 1065 0 0 0 3502 5187 0 0 6792 1698 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.03 0.30 0.00 0.00 0.34 0.18 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.37 0.37 0.37 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.05 0.58 0.00 0.00 0.53 0.53 Volume/Cap: 0.64 0.64 0.64 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.52 0.00 0.00 0.64 0.35 Uniform Del: 26.2 26.2 26.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 46.7 12.4 0.0 0.0 16.5 13.3 IncremntDel: 0.5 0.5 0.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 26.7 26.7 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.6 12.6 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.3 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 26.7 26.7 26.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 54.6 12.6 0.0 0.0 16.8 13.3 LOS by Move: C C C A A A D B A A B B HCM2kAvgQ: 11 11 11 0 0 0 2 10 0 0 13 6 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 4-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #6 SR-55 Southbound Ramp/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.574Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 18.7Optimal Cycle: 29 Level Of Service: B********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Ignore Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 542 0 1452 499 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 542 0 1452 499 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 542 0 1452 499 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 PHF Volume: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 0 0 1452 0 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 0 0 1452 0 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 FinalVolume: 0 0 0 223 0 783 0 1437 0 0 1452 0 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.87 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 Lanes: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.22 0.00 1.78 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 0 0 0 2027 0 2951 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1900 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.11 0.00 0.27 0.00 0.28 0.00 0.00 0.28 0.00 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.46 0.00 0.49 0.00 0.00 0.49 0.00 Volume/Cap: 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.57 0.00 0.00 0.57 0.00 Uniform Del: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.2 0.0 19.7 0.0 18.2 0.0 0.0 18.2 0.0 IncremntDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0 0.3 0.0 0.0 0.3 0.0 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 Delay/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 20.1 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 0.0 0.0 0.0 16.3 0.0 20.1 0.0 18.5 0.0 0.0 18.5 0.0 LOS by Move: A A A B A C A B A A B A HCM2kAvgQ: 0 0 0 3 0 10 0 11 0 0 11 0 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
Future Plus Project PM Thu Jul 5, 2012 14:58:30 Page 5-1 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Level Of Service Computation Report 2000 HCM Operations Method (Future Volume Alternative) ********************************************************************************Intersection #7 SR-55 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue ********************************************************************************Cycle (sec): 100 Critical Vol./Cap.(X): 0.428Loss Time (sec): 5 Average Delay (sec/veh): 7.9Optimal Cycle: 22 Level Of Service: A********************************************************************************Approach: North Bound South Bound East Bound West Bound Movement: L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R L - T - R ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Control: Protected Protected Protected Protected Rights: Include Include Ignore Include Min. Green: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y+R: 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lanes: 1 0 1! 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 1 0 0 3 0 1 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Volume Module:Base Vol: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 513 0 1677 306 Growth Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Initial Bse: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 513 0 1677 306 Added Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PasserByVol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Initial Fut: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 513 0 1677 306 User Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 PHF Volume: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 0 0 1677 306 Reduct Vol: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced Vol: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 0 0 1677 306 PCE Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 MLF Adj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 FinalVolume: 229 0 163 0 0 0 0 950 0 0 1677 306 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Saturation Flow Module:Sat/Lane: 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 1900 Adjustment: 0.91 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 0.85 Lanes: 1.58 0.00 1.42 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 Final Sat.: 2744 0 2453 0 0 0 0 5187 1900 0 5187 1615 ------------|---------------||---------------||---------------||---------------|Capacity Analysis Module:Vol/Sat: 0.08 0.00 0.07 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.18 0.00 0.00 0.32 0.19 Crit Moves: **** **** **** Green/Cycle: 0.19 0.00 0.19 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.00 0.00 0.76 0.76 Volume/Cap: 0.43 0.00 0.34 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.24 0.00 0.00 0.43 0.25 Uniform Del: 35.4 0.0 34.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.4 3.7 IncremntDel: 0.3 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 InitQueuDel: 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Delay Adj: 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 Delay/Veh: 35.7 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 3.8 User DelAdj: 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 AdjDel/Veh: 35.7 0.0 34.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 3.7 0.0 0.0 4.5 3.8 LOS by Move: D A C A A A A A A A A A HCM2kAvgQ: 4 0 3 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 7 3 ******************************************************************************** Traffix 8.0.0715 (c) 2008 Dowling Assoc. Licensed to LSA ASSOC. IRVINE, CA
L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .
S E PT E M B E R 2 0 1 2
T R A F F I C I M P A C T A N A L Y S I S U P D A T E
PL A T I N U M G A T E W A Y R E S I D E N T I A L D E V E L O P M E N T
A N A H E I M , C A L I FO R N I A
P:\SHP1201\Doc\TIA Gateway_updated1.doc «09/26/12»
APPENDIX D
MITIGATED
LEVEL OF SERVICE WORKSHEETS
Intersection Number: 3
North/South Roadway: Lewis Street
East/West Roadway: Katella Avenue
Existing No Project Existing Plus Project
Move-Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 28 0.00 0.02
NBT 0.5 850 36 66 0.04 *0.08 *0.5 850 40 82 0.05 *0.10 *
NBR 0.5 850 13 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 13 9 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.0 1,700 59 104 0.03 *0.06 *1.0 1,700 132 143 0.08 *0.08 *
SBT 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 21 0.00 0.01
SBR 1.0 1,700 160 246 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 201 268 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 10 131 0.01 0.08 *1.0 1,700 27 196 0.02 0.12 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 *0.20 2.5 4,250 1,411 858 0.33 *0.20
EBR 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 348 6 0.00 0.00
WBL 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 *0.01 1.0 1,700 16 15 0.01 *0.01
WBT 3.5 5,950 802 1,542 0.13 0.26 *3.5 5,950 843 1,564 0.14 0.26 *
WBR 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 4 50 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.07 0.14 0.13 0.18
E/W Critical Movements 0.34 0.34 0.34 0.38
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.46 0.53 ICU 0.52 0.61
Level of Service (LOS) A A Level of Service (LOS) A B
LSA Associates
Opening Year No Project Opening Year Plus Project
Move- Volume V/C Ratio Volume V/C Ratio
ment Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM Lane Cap. AM PM AM PM
NBL 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02 1.0 1,700 5 29 0.00 0.02
NBT 0.5 850 38 69 0.04 *0.08 *0.5 850 42 85 0.05 *0.10 *
NBR 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 14 9 0.00 0.00
SBL 1.0 1,700 155 159 0.09 *0.09 *1.0 1,700 228 198 0.13 *0.12 *
SBT 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01 1.0 1,700 6 22 0.00 0.01
SBR 1.0 0 1,700 168 258 0.00 0.00 1.0 0 1,700 209 280 0.00 0.00
EBL 1.0 1,700 378 188 0.22 *0.11 *1.0 1,700 395 253 0.23 *0.15 *
EBT 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37 2.5 4,250 1,734 1,590 0.41 0.37
EBR 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 10 6 0.00 0.00
WBL 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01 1.0 1,700 17 16 0.01 0.01
WBT 3.5 5,950 1,480 2,167 0.25 *0.36 *3.5 5,950 1,521 2,189 0.26 *0.37 *
WBR 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00 0.5 0 850 5 52 0.00 0.00
N/S Critical Movements 0.13 0.17 0.18 0.22
E/W Critical Movements 0.47 0.47 0.49 0.52
Right Turn Critical Movement 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Clearance Interval 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05
ICU 0.65 0.69 ICU 0.72 0.79
Level of Service (LOS) B B Level of Service (LOS) C C
Right Turn Conditions:
P - Protected right turn movement
U -Unprotected right turn movement
N -No right turn on red
F - Free right turn lane
Intersection Capacity Utilization Analysis
&LW\RI$QDKHLP
3ULRULW\3URMHFW
3UHOLPLQDU\2Q6LWH6HZHU6\VWHP6WXG\
3URMHFW1DPH 3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
3/$11,1*$33/,&$7,2112 '(9
3$5&(//27180%(5 6 3$5&(/6 )5203$5&(/0$3
$66(662563$5&(/180%(5 6
352-(&76,7($''5(66 ($67.$7(//$$9(18(
$1$+(,0&$
3UHSDUHGIRU
6KRSRII$GYLVRUV/3
3DUN3OD]D6XLWH
,UYLQH&$
3UHSDUHGE\
(GZDUG72XQH3(46'
+DOO )RUHPDQ,QF
(WK6WUHHW6XLWH
7XVWLQ&$
HRXQH#KILQFFRP
(GZDUG72XQH 5&(
3UHSDUHG 2FWREHU
5HYLVHG 1RYHPEHU
6KRSRII$GYLVRUV/3
ƉƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ,ĂůůΘ&ŽƌĞŵĂŶ͕/ŶĐ͘ WĂŐĞŝ
ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ͝
ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ͝Ǧ͟
ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǤǤ ͠Ǧ͝͝
ǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥǥ͝͞
͝Ǥ
Ȁ
ȋǤȌ
Ǥ̾
̾Ǥ͝ǡǤ͜͜͢͞ǡȀ Ǥ
̾Ƭ ̾ Ǥ
͜͜͞͠
̾̾Ǥ
͞Ǥ
Ȁ
ȋƬ
Ȍ Ǥ Ǥ
͟Ǥ
Ȁ
Ƭ
ȋǤȌ Ǥ
͠Ǥ
ͤ͞ȋǤȌ Ǥ̾
̾Ǥ͝ǡǤ͜͜͢͞ǡ
͞ǡ͟Ƭ͡
ȀȀ Ǥ
͡Ǥ
ǡ
ȋƬȌ Ǥ
ǡ
Ǥ
͢Ǥ ͤ̾͝Ƭ̾͞͝
ǤǤ
ͣǤ
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϭ
([HFXWLYH6XPPDU\
7KLVVWXG\KDVWZRREMHFWLYHV)LUVWLVWRFRPSDUHWKHHVWLPDWHGVHZHUIORZVWKDWZLOOEH
JHQHUDWHGE\WKHFXUUHQWO\SURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWYHUVXVWKHIORZVWKDWZRXOG
KDYHEHHQJHQHUDWHGE\WKHSUHYLRXVO\DSSURYHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFW7KHVHFRQG
REMHFWLYHLVWRVKRZWKDWWKHHQWLUH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWFDQEHDFFRPPRGDWHGE\WKH
UHFHQWO\LQVWDOOHG.DWHOOD$YHQXHVHZHUHYHQWKRXJKKDOIRIWKHSURMHFWVLWHZDVQRW
LQFOXGHGLQWKHGHVLJQWULEXWDU\DUHDIRUWKHVHZHU
7KHVWXG\VKRZVWKDWWKHFXUUHQWO\SURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWZLOOJHQHUDWHD
VXEVWDQWLDOO\UHGXFHGYROXPHRIVHZHUIORZVWKDQWKHSUHYLRXVO\DSSURYHGSURMHFWZRXOG
KDYH7KHVWXG\DOVRVKRZVWKDWWKHLQFUHDVHLQIORZIURPWKHDGGLWLRQDODUHDLVPRUHWKDQ
RIIVHWE\UHGXFWLRQLQIORZIURPFRPSOHWHGDQGDSSURYHGSURMHFWVGRZQVWUHDP7KHUHIRUH
IORZVIURPWKHHQWLUH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWFDQEHDFFRPPRGDWHGLQWKH.DWHOOD
V\VWHP
,QWURGXFWLRQDQG%DFNJURXQG
7KH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\VLWHLVZLWKLQWKH3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH0DVWHU3ODQ7KHSURMHFWLV
ORFDWHGRQWKHQRUWKHDVWHUO\FRUQHURI.DWHOOD$YHQXHDQG/HZLV6WUHHW7KHSURSHUW\LVDQ
DFUHUHFWDQJXODUSDUFHOZKLFKH[WHQGVIHHWDORQJ.DWHOOD$YHHDVWRI/HZLV6WUHHW
DQGIHHWDORQJ/HZLV6WQRUWKRI.DWHOOD$YH
$GHYHORSPHQWDJUHHPHQWIRUWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWZDVDSSURYHGE\WKH&LW\RI
$QDKHLPLQ7KHGHYHORSPHQWFDOOHGIRUUHVLGHQWLDOXQLWVD VIRIILFH
EXLOGLQJDQGDVIKRWHO7KHFXUUHQWO\SURSRVHGYHUVLRQRIWKHSURMHFWFRQVLVWV
RI UHVLGHQWLDOXQLWVZLWKQRRIILFHDQGQRKRWHO
7KH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWKDVDFRPSDQLRQSURMHFWRQWKHQHLJKERULQJSURSHUW\WRWKH
HDVW7KLVSURMHFWLVNQRZQDV3ODWLQXP9LVWD7KDWSURMHFWLVEHLQJSURFHVVHGIRU
DSSURYDOVLQGHSHQGHQWO\RIEXWFRQFXUUHQWO\ZLWK3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\E\WKHVDPH
GHYHORSPHQWWHDP7KHWZRSURMHFWVZLOOEHDFFHVVHGIURPDSURSRVHGFRQQHFWRUVWUHHWWR
EHORFDWHGDORQJWKHLUFRPPRQSURSHUW\OLQH7KHSURMHFWVZLOOEHVHUYHGE\QHZSXEOLF
XWLOLWLHVZLWKLQWKDWVWUHHW
7KHUHDUHWKUHHH[LVWLQJVHZHUPDLQVZLWKLQWKHVXUURXQGLQJVWUHHWV/HZLV6WUHHWKDVDQ
H[LVWLQJVHZHUPDLQIORZLQJVRXWKHUO\WR.DWHOOD$YHQXHZKHUHLWFRQIOXHQFHVZLWKDQ
VHZHUPDLQWKDWIORZVZHVWHUO\DORQJ.DWHOOD$YHDQGFRQWLQXHVZHVWHUO\WRZDUGV
+DUERU%OYGLQDVHZHUPDLQ
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
Ϯ
.DWHOODKDVWZRH[LVWLQJVHZHUPDLQVRQHIORZLQJHDVWDQGRQHIORZLQJZHVW7KH
H[LVWLQJVHZHUPDLQRQWKHQRUWKHUO\VLGHRI.DWHOOD$YHIORZVZHVWHUO\DQGFRQQHFWV
WRWKHDIRUHPHQWLRQHG/HZLV6WUHHWVHZHUDWWKHLQWHUVHFWLRQRIWKHWZRVWUHHWV
7KHZHVWHUQSRUWLRQRIWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\VLWHLVZLWKLQWKHWULEXWDU\DUHDRIWKLV
ZHVWHUQIORZLQJV\VWHP+RZHYHUGRZQVWUHDPVHJPHQWVRIWKLVV\VWHPDUHDOUHDG\
IORZLQJDWRUDERYHFDSDFLW\0DMRUFDSDFLW\HQKDQFHPHQWLPSURYHPHQWVZLOOEHUHTXLUHG
WRDFFRPPRGDWHDQ\IORZVIURPWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFW7KHSURMHFWHGFRVWRI
FDSDFLW\HQKDQFHPHQVLVDSSUR[LPDWHO\PLOOLRQZKLFKPDNHWKLVDOWHUQDWLYH
LQIHDVLEOHIRUWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFW7KHUHIRUHLWLVSUHIHUUHGWKDWWKHHQWLUH
SURMHFWEHVHZHUHGWRDVHFRQGVHZHUPDLQLQ.DWHOOD$YHQXH7KLVQHZHUVHZHUIORZV
HDVWHUO\ZLWKLQWKHVRXWKHUO\VLGHRI.DWHOODWRZDUGV6WDWH&ROOHJH%OYG
7KH&LW\RI$QDKHLPKDVUHFRPPHQGHGWKDWWKLVSURMHFW DQGWKHQHLJKERULQJSURMHFW
3ODWLQXP9LVWD VKRXOGEHFRQQHFWHGWRWKH´HDVWHUO\IORZLQJVHZHUPDLQLQ.DWHOOD
$YHQXH+RZHYHUWKHUHLVDPDMRUH[LVWLQJXQGHUJURXQGXWLOLW\GXFWEDQNZLWKLQWKHQRUWK
VLGHRI.DWHOOD$YHQXHDWDGHSWKWKDWSUHVHQWVDSK\VLFDOLPSHGLPHQWWRDJUDYLW\
FRQQHFWLRQIURPWKH*DWHZD\SURMHFWWRWKH´VHZHU&RPSRXQGLQJWKHLVVXHWKH
HDVWHUO\IORZLQJVHZHUPDLQLVYHU\VKDOORZDWWKHSURSRVHGSRLQWRIFRQQHFWLRQ6KRXOGD
JUDYLW\FRQQHFWLRQSURYHLQIHDVLEOHWKHQLWZLOOEHFRPHQHFHVVDU\WRFRQQHFWWRWKH´
VHZHUXVLQJDQRQVLWHOLIWVWDWLRQDQGIRUFHPDLQWRGLUHFWRQVLWHIORZVRYHUWKHGXFWEDQN
WRWKHHDVWHUO\IORZLQJVHZHUPDLQ$QDOWHUQDWLYHWRDOLIWVWDWLRQDQGIRUFHPDLQLVDQ
LQYHUWHGVLSKRQVHZHUV\VWHP7ZRH[LVWLQJGHYHORSPHQWVGRZQVWUHDPWRWKHHDVWRIWKLV
SURMHFWVLWHKDYHLQVWDOOHGLQYHUWHGVLSKRQVLQRUGHUWRSDVVXQGHUWKHHOHFWULFDOGXFWEDQN
+RZHYHUGXHWRWKHVKDOOGHSWKRIWKHHDVWHUO\IORZLQJVHZHUPDLQLQ.DWHOOD$YHWKLVZLOO
SURYHWREHDQLQIHDVLEOHFRQFHSW)XUWKHUPRUHWKH&LW\RI$QDKHLPSXEOLFZRUNVVWDIILV
RSSRVHGWRWKHLQVWDOODWLRQRIDQRWKHULQYHUWHGVLSKRQGXHWRWKHGLIILFXOW\DQGFRVWRI
PDLQWDLQLQJVXFKIDFLOLWLHV7KHSURSRVHGOLIWVWDWLRQDQGIRUFHPDLQZRXOGEHPDLQWDLQHG
E\DQ+2$IRUPHGIRUWKLVSURMHFW7KH&LW\ZRXOGLVVXHDQHQFURDFKPHQWOLFHQVHIRUWKH
SRUWLRQRIWKHIRUFHPDLQWKDWZRXOGEHLQWKHVWUHHWULJKWRIZD\
7KHHDVWHUQIORZLQJVHZHUZDVGHVLJQHGWRDFFHSWIORZVIURP3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOHSURMHFWV
ZLWKLQDVHZHUPRGHODUHDLGHQWLILHGDV%ZKLFKLVORFDWHGLPPHGLDWHO\DGMDFHQWWR
.DWHOOD$YHRQERWKWKHQRUWKHUO\DQGVRXWKHUO\VLGHVEHWZHHQ/HZLV6WDQG6WDWH&ROOHJH
%OYG 6HHWKH3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH6HZHU6WXG\0DSLQ$WWDFKPHQW 7KHHDVWHUQKDOIRI
WKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\VLWHLVZLWKLQVHZHUPRGHODUHD%7KHZHVWHUO\SDUFHORIWKH
3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWLVZLWKLQPRGHODUHD$ZKLFKLVWDEOHGWRVHZHUWRWKH
LPSDFWHGZHVWHUO\VHZHUVKHG
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϯ
$VGHYHORSPHQWVKDYHPRYHGIRUZDUGZLWKLQ$UHD%LWLVWXUQLQJRXWWKDWWKHDFWXDO
SURMHFWVDUHJHQHUDWLQJOHVVVHZHUIORZWKDQZDVDVVXPHGLQWKHGHVLJQRIWKH.DWHOOD
VHZHU7KLVVWXG\ZLOOH[DPLQHWKHGLIIHUHQFHVEHWZHHQWKHGHVLJQIORZVDQGWKHDFWXDO
IORZVIRUVHYHUDOSURMHFWVDORQJ.DWHOOD$YHQXHLQRUGHUWRGHWHUPLQHWKHDELOLW\RIWKDW
V\VWHPWRDFFHSWWKHIORZIURPWKHZHVWHUQSDUWRIWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFW
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϰ
7KHIROORZLQJDQDO\VLVSURYLGHVVXSSRUWLQJGDWDWRFRQILUPIROORZLQJ
7KHGHVLJQRIWKH´HDVWHUQIORZLQJVHZHULQ.DWHOOD$YHSURYLGHVDGHTXDWH
FDSDFLW\WRLQFOXGHWKHSURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWLQLWVHQWLUHW\HYHQWKRXJKDSRUWLRQ
RIWKHSURMHFWDUHDZDVQRWLQWKHRULJLQDOWULEXWDU\DUHD
7KHSURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWZLWK UHVLGHQWLDOXQLWVZLOOJHQHUDWHOHVV
VHZHUIORZWKDQZRXOGKDYHEHHQJHQHUDWHGE\WKHSUHYLRXVO\DSSURYHGYHUVLRQRI
WKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFW 6HH7DEOH
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϱ
$QDO\VLVDQG'LVFXVVLRQ
7DEOHSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHWRWDOSURMHFWVHZHUIORZVRIWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\DQG
3ODWLQXP9LVWDSURMHFWVIURPWKHRULJLQDOGHVLJQ DWWDFKPHQW YVWKHDFWXDOGHVLJQ
DWWDFKPHQW
7$%/(
3/$11,1*$5($6&2175,%87,1*723/$7,180*$7(:$< 9,67$
6,7( 352-(&71$0( 25,*,1$/
'(6,*1 JSG
$&78$/
'(6,*1 JSG
&+$1*(
JSG
5HGXFHG
E\
$&78$/
'(6,*1
FIV E\$YHRI
'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV
E\ 7\SH
RI%HGURRP
8QLWV
3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
DND./3URSHUW\
ZLWKLQ%
3ODWLQXP9LVWD DND
0DUVKDOO3URSHUW\
ZLWKLQ%
6XE7RWDO
3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
DND./3URSHUW\
ZLWKLQ$
7RWDO *DWHZD\9LVWD%
$
1RWH
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI
%HGURRPV DQGVXSSRUWLQJDUFKLWHFWXUDOSODQVKHHWVZLWKEHGURRPVXPPDU\WDEOHV
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU3URSRVHG0DUVKDOO
./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϲ
7DEOHSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHYDULRXVSURMHFWVWULEXWDU\WRHDVWHUO\.DWHOODV\VWHP
% DQGWKHLURULJLQDOVHZHUIORZGHVLJQ DWWDFKPHQWV YVWKHDFWXDOGHVLJQ
DWWDFKPHQWV
7$%/(
3/$11,1*$5($6&2175,%87,1*7202'(/$5($%21/<
6,7( 352-(&71$0( 25,*,1$/
'(6,*1 JSG
$&78$/'(6,*1
JSG
&+$1*(
JSG
5HGXFHG
E\E\$YHRI
'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV
E\ 7\SHRI
%HGURRP8QLWV
3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
9LVWDZLWKLQ%
6WDGLXP/RIWV
6WDGLXP3DUN
$SWV&RQGRV DND
3DUN9LULGLDQ 2QO\
KDYHEHHQ
FRQVWUXFWHG
7RWDO
3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH
&RQGRV2QO\
&RQGRVKDYHEHHQ
FRQVWUXFWHG 1R
&RPPHUFLDO
7RWDO
5HVLGHQWLDO2QO\
/HQQDU
V$7RZQ
0HWUR
:ULJKW&LUFOH
7RWDO
1RWH
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI
%HGURRPV DQGVXSSRUWLQJDUFKLWHFWXUDOSODQVKHHWVZLWKEHGURRPVXPPDU\WDEOHV
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU3URSRVHG0DUVKDOO
./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU0RGHO$UHD%
%\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU&RQVWUXFWHG
3RUWLRQVRI3DUN9LULGLDQ3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH&RQGRPLQLXPV 6WDGLXP/RIWV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI%HGURRPV
DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϳ
7DEOHSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHWRWDOUHGXFWLRQLQVHZHUIORZVIRUSURMHFWVWULEXWDU\WR
WKHHDVWHUO\.DWHOODV\VWHPFRPSDUHGWRWKHUHGLUHFWHGVHZHUIORZVIRUWKHSURSRVHG
SURMHFW 5HIHUWR7DEOHV
7$%/(
3/$11,1*02'(/$5($%,1&/8',1*3/$7,180*$7(:$<02'(/
$5($$
7RWDORIUHGLUHFWHGIORZIURPPRGHODUHD$DSRUWLRQRIWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFW7DEOH
7RWDORIVHZHUIORZUHGXFHGIURP7DEOH 7RWDOVHZHUIORZVEHORZWKHPD[LPXPPDVWHUSODQIRU
PRGHODUHD%
7RWDOϭϳϬ͕ϳϵϲŐƉĚͲϳϮϴ͕ϱϬϴŐƉĚсͲϱϱϳ͕ϳϭϮŐƉĚ
7DEOHSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHWRWDOSURMHFWVHZHUIORZVRIWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
SURMHFWIURPWKHRULJLQDOGHVLJQ DWWDFKPHQW YVWKHDFWXDOGHVLJQ DWWDFKPHQW
LQFOXGLQJWKHUHGLUHFWHGIORZVWRHDVWHUO\.DWHOOD %
7$%/(
3/$11,1*$5($6&2175,%87,1*723/$7,180*$7(:$<21/<
6,7( 352-(&71$0( 25,*,1$/
'(6,*1 JSG
$&78$/
'(6,*1 JSG
&+$1*(
JSG
5HGXFHG
E\E\$YHRI
'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV
E\ 7\SH
RI%HGURRP
8QLWV
3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
DND./3URSHUW\
ZLWKLQ%
3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
DND./3URSHUW\
ZLWKLQ$
6XE7RWDO $%
1RWH
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI
%HGURRPV DQGVXSSRUWLQJDUFKLWHFWXUDOSODQVKHHWVZLWKEHGURRPVXPPDU\WDEOHV
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU3URSRVHG0DUVKDOO
./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϴ
7DEOHSURYLGHVDVXPPDU\RIWKHYDULRXVSURMHFWVWULEXWDU\WRHDVWHUO\.DWHOODV\VWHP
% LQFOXGLQJWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\PRGHO$UHD $ DQGWKHLURULJLQDOVHZHUIORZ
GHVLJQ DWWDFKPHQWV YVWKHDFWXDOGHVLJQ DWWDFKPHQWV
7$%/(
3/$11,1*$5($6&2175,%87,1*7202'(/$5($% ,1&/8',1*3/$7,180
*$7(:$<$5($)52002'(/$5($$
6,7(
352-(&71$0( 25,*,1$/
'(6,*1 JSG
$&78$/
'(6,*1 JSG
&+$1*(
JSG
5HGXFHG
E\
)8785(
&216758&7('
E\$YHRI
'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV
E\ 7\SHRI
%HGURRP8QLWV
JSG FIV
3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
$%9LVWD
ZLWKLQ%
6WDGLXP/RIWV
6WDGLXP3DUN
$SWV&RQGRV DND
3DUN9LULGLDQ 2QO\
KDYHEHHQ
FRQVWUXFWHG
7RWDO
3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH
&RQGRV2QO\
&RQGRVKDYHEHHQ
FRQVWUXFWHG 1R
&RPPHUFLDO
7RWDO 3URMHFWHG
%XLOGRXW
5HVLGHQWLDO2QO\
/HQQDU
V$7RZQ
0HWUR 2QO\RI
GHYHORSPHQWLV
WDEOHGWR0RGHO$UHD
%
:LWKLQ6HZHU
6KHG%
:ULJKW&LUFOH
7RWDO
7RWDO,QFOXGLQJ$FWXDO'HVLJQ&RQVWUXFWHG
3KDVHV 6LWHV 2ULJLQDO'HVLJQ
&RQWULEXWLQJWR7KH(DVWHUO\)ORZLQJ6HZHU
0DLQLQ.DWHOOD$YH
1RWH
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI
%HGURRPV DQGVXSSRUWLQJDUFKLWHFWXUDOSODQVKHHWVZLWKEHGURRPVXPPDU\WDEOHV
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU3URSRVHG0DUVKDOO
./3URSHUWLHV %\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϵ
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU0RGHO$UHD%
%\$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWV DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
5HIHUWR$WWDFKPHQWVXSSRUWLQJVSUHDGVKHHWFDOFXODWLRQ6HZHU*HQHUDWLRQ5DWHV)RU&RQVWUXFWHG
3RUWLRQVRI3DUN9LULGLDQ3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH&RQGRPLQLXPV 6WDGLXP/RIWV %\7RWDO1XPEHURI%HGURRPV
DQGVXSSRUWLQJUHIHUHQFHGRFXPHQWV
7KHSURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\DQG3ODWLQXP9LVWDGHYHORSPHQWVZLOOFUHDWHDQLQFUHDVH
LQWKHQXPEHURIUHVLGHQWLDOXQLWVRYHUWKHQXPEHURIXQLWVSUHYLRXVO\DSSURYHGIRUWKHWZR
SURMHFWV7KHGZHOOLQJXQLWLQFUHDVHVIURPXQLWV SUHYLRXVO\DSSURYHG WR XQLWV
6KRSRIIGHYHORSPHQW IRUDQLQFUHDVHRIGZHOOLQJXQLWV+RZHYHUWKH6KRSRII
SURMHFWVZLOOEHSXUHO\UHVLGHQWLDO:KHQIDFWRULQJWKHFRPPHUFLDOUHWDLORIILFHUHVWDXUDQW
FRPSRQHQWVRIWKHSUHYLRXVO\DSSURYHGGHYHORSPHQWVWKHUHLVDQRYHUDOOQHWGHFUHDVHRI
WKHIORZUDWHVRIJSG 6HH7DEOH 7KHVHYDOXHVDUHEDVHGRQWKHDOORFDWHG
DYHUDJHGZHOOLQJXQLWVSHUDFUHRUVTXDUHIRRWRIFRPPHUFLDOUHWDLOUHVWDXUDQWDUHDRI
GHYHORSPHQWJHQHUDWLRQUDWHVDVRXWOLQHGLQWKH3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH0DVWHU6HZHU3ODQ
7KH3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOHODQGXVHH[KLELWVXQGHU$WWDFKPHQWV IRUWKHPRGHODUHD
LGHQWLILHGDV%ZHUHHYDOXDWHG7KHIROORZLQJSODQQLQJDUHDVZLWKLQPRGHODUHD%DUH
ZKLFKVHZHUVWRWKHHDVWHUO\IORZLQJ.DWHOOD$YHVHZHUPDLQ0RGHODUHD
%DOVRLQFOXGHVWKH0DUVKDOO 9LVWD SURSHUW\DQGDSRUWLRQRIWKH./ *DWHZD\ SURSHUW\
DSSUR[LPDWHO\WKHGHYHORSPHQWDUHD 6HH7DEOH
3ODQQLQJ$UHD6WDGLXP/RIWV FRQGR
V VIUHVWDXUDQWVIUHWDLO
3ODQQLQJ$UHD6WDGLXP3DUN$SDUWPHQWVDQG6WDGLXP&OXEFRQGRV XQLWV
3ODQQLQJ$UHD3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH&RQGRPLQLXP'HYHORSPHQW IODWVVIUHWDLO
3ODQQLQJ$UHD /HQQDU
V$7RZQ0HWUR GZHOOLQJXQLWV VI
FRPPHUFLDOUHWDLO
3ODQQLQJ$UHD:ULJKW&LUFOH3URSRVDO XQLWV
0DUVKDOO3URSHUW\DND9LVWD FRQGR
V VIUHVWDXUDQW
./3URSHUW\DND*DWHZD\ FRQGR
V VI2IILFH5HVWDXUDQWVI+RWHO
2IILFH5HWDLO5HVWDXUDQWEHGURRPV
7KHDOORWWHGVHZHUJHQHUDWLRQIRUPRGHODUHD%LVJSGEDVHGRQDYHUDJH
GZHOOLQJXQLWJHQHUDWLRQUDWHV7KLVGRHVQRWLQFOXGHDSRUWLRQRIWKHSURSRVHG3ODWLQXP
*DWHZD\VLWHZKLFKLVLQPRGHODUHD$
$PRUHSUHFLVHVHZHUJHQHUDWLRQFDOFXODWLRQEDVHGRQQXPEHURIEHGURRPXQLWVLQVWHDGRI
QXPEHURIDYHUDJHGZHOOLQJXQLWVKDVEHHQSHUIRUPHGRQWKHIROORZLQJGHYHORSPHQWV
ZKLFKKDYHEHHQFRQVWUXFWHGRULVSURSRVHGWREHGHYHORSHGDORQJ.DWHOOD$YH $UHDZLWKLQ
PRGHODUHD%
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϭϬ
7KH6WDGLXP/RIWV6LWH XQLWV VIUHVWDXUDQWUHWDLO JSG
$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW JSG
7KH3ODWLQXP7ULDQJOH&RQGRPLQLXPV6LWH XQLWVRIWKHDOORWWHGXQLWVKDYH
EHHQFRQVWUXFWHGDQGQRQHRIVIUHWDLOKDVEHHQFRQVWUXFWHG
JSG
$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW
JSG
7KH3DUN9LULGLDQ6LWHDOVRNQRZQDV6WDGLXP3DUN$SDUWPHQWVDQG6WDGLXP&OXE
FRQGRVLQWKHPDVWHUDUHDSODQ XQLWVRIWKHDOORWWHGXQLWVKDYHEHHQ
FRQVWUXFWHG JSG
$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW
JSG
6HH7DEOH
7KH3ODWLQXP9LVWDVLWH FRQGR
V VIUHVWDXUDQW JSG
$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW JSG
7KH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\VLWH FRQGR
V VI2IILFH5HVWDXUDQWVI+RWHO
2IILFH5HWDLO5HVWDXUDQWEHGURRPV JSG
$YH'ZHOOLQJ8QLWYV%HGURRP8QLW JSG
6HH7DEOH
7KHFRPELQHGVHZHUIORZJHQHUDWLRQUHGXFWLRQIURPWKHVHWKUHHFRQVWUXFWHGGHYHORSPHQWV
WRWKHHDVWRIWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\ 9LVWDSURMHFWVDQGWKHSURSRVHGRQVLWH
GHYHORSPHQWZLWKLQPRGHODUHD%DUHJSG
7KLVUHGXFWLRQLQRYHUDOOVHZHUVKHGJHQHUDWLRQPRUHWKDQRIIVHWVWKHDGGLWLRQRIWKH
SRUWLRQRISURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWDUHDZLWKLQPRGHODUHD$IORZRI
JSG7KHUHIRUHWKHHDVWHUO\IORZLQJVHZHUPDLQLQ.DWHOOD$YHVKRXOGDFFRPPRGDWHWKH
DGGLWLRQRIWKHFRPELQHGUHGXFHGVHZHUIORZVIURPWKHPRGHODUHD%DQGWKHSURSRVHG
RQVLWHGHYHORSPHQW$QHWUHGXFWLRQEHORZWKHDOORFDWHGVHZHUSURGXFWLRQTXDQWLW\IRU
PRGHODUHD%LV JSG VHH7DEOH
6HH7DEOH
7KHFRPELQHGVHZHUJHQHUDWLRQIRUPRGHODUHD%DQGWKH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\ 9LVWD
GHYHORSPHQWLVJSGJSG JSG
7DEOHSURYLGHVWKHVHZHUJHQHUDWLRQIRUWKHSURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\GHYHORSPHQW
ZLWKLQERWKPRGHODUHDV$ %DQGGRHVQRWLQFOXGHWKH3ODWLQXP9LVWDVLWH
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϭϭ
7DEOHSURYLGHVWKHVHZHUJHQHUDWLRQIRUWKHSURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\GHYHORSPHQW
ZLWKLQERWKPRGHODUHDV$ %LQFOXGLQJWKH3ODWLQXP9LVWDVLWHDQGWKHDSSURYHG
GRZQVWUHDPGHYHORSPHQWSODQQLQJDUHDVFRQWULEXWLQJWRPRGHODUHD%
6HHDWWDFKPHQW
)ORZ0DVWHUSLSHFDSDFLW\FDOFXODWLRQIRUWKHXSVWUHDP9&3GHPRQVWUDWHVWKHRQVLWH
GHYHORSPHQWSURGXFHVFIV JSG VHH7DEOHSLSHFDSDFLW\ZKLFKLV
ZLWKLQWKHDFFHSWDEOHG'SLSHFDSDFLW\DQG9 ISV7KHSURSRVHGIRUFHPDLQ
ZLOOSURYLGHDGGLWLRQDOIORZZKHQSXPSLQJRFFXUVIRUWKHVOLJKWO\ORZHUIORZYHORFLW\
FDOFXODWHGLQWKHLQLWLDOOHQJWKRIWKHJUDYLW\OLQH7KHFDOFXODWLRQIRUWKHGRZQVWUHDP
9&3IRUFRPELQHGVHZHUIORZVIRUHDVWHUO\IORZLQJ.DWHOOD$YHVHZHUPDLQSURGXFHV
FIV JSG VHH7DEOHSLSHFDSDFLW\ZKLFKLVVOLJKWO\KLJKHUWKDQWKHG'
WKUHVKROGDQG9 ISV
^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ//͘WůĂƚŝŶƵŵͺ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͲ^ĞǁĞƌ
^ƚƵĚLJ͘ĚŽĐdž
ϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮϵ͗ϭϭ͗ϮϰD
ϭϮ
&RQFOXVLRQV
7KHSURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWZLOOJHQHUDWHVLJQLILFDQWO\OHVVIORZWRWKH
VHZHUV\VWHPWKDQZRXOGKDYHEHHQSURGXFHGE\WKHSUHYLRXVO\DSSURYHGYHUVLRQRI
WKHSURMHFW
7KH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\3ODWLQXP9LVWDDQGWKUHHUHFHQWO\FRPSOHWHGSURMHFWVDORQJ
.DWHOOD$YHQXHJHQHUDWHVHZHUVIORZVEHORZVHZHUJHQHUDWLRQDPRXQWVDOORFDWHGE\
WKH0DVWHU3ODQRI6HZHU6WXG\$FFRUGLQJO\WKHSURSRVHG3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\
GHYHORSPHQWZLOOQRWDGYHUVHO\LPSDFWGRZQVWUHDPSLSHFDSDFLW\DVWKHHDVWHUO\
IORZLQJVHZHULQ.DWHOOD$YHQXHZLOOKDYHWKHFDSDFLW\WRDFFHSWWKHVHZHUIORZV
IURPWKHHQWLUH3ODWLQXP*DWHZD\SURMHFWLQFOXGLQJWKHSRUWLRQRIWKHVLWHZLWKLQ
$UHD$
7KHRQVLWHGHYHORSPHQWIORZLQJWRWKHXSVWUHDPVHZHUPDLQFRQQHFWLRQLQWKH
HDVWHUO\IORZLQJ.DWHOODOLQHIORZVDWSLSHFDSDFLW\ZKLFKZHOOZLWKLQWKH
G'JXLGHOLQH
7KHFRPELQHGVHZHUIORZVIRUWKHHQWLUHVHZHUVKHGZLWKLQ0RGHO$UHD%DQGWKH
SURSRVHGGHYHORSPHQWGHPRQVWUDWHVWKHH[LVWLQJGRZQVWUHDPVHZHUPDLQ
IORZLQJHDVWHUO\LQ.DWHOOD$YHQXHWR6WDWH&ROOHJH%OYGIORZVDWSLSH
FDSDFLW\7KLVLVVOLJKWO\DERYHWKHG'JXLGHOLQHEXWGHPRQVWUDWHVWKHSLSH
LVQRWIORZLQJIXOODQGKDVFDSDFLW\WRFDUU\WKHGHYHORSHGVHZHUIORZV7KHYDOXHV
SURYLGHGDUHEDVHGRQSHDNVHZHUIORZVXVLQJ3) $QDOWHUQDWLYHIORZUDWH
FDOFXODWLRQEDVHGRQDYHUDJHGU\ZHDWKHUIORZDQGSHDNGU\ZHDWKHUIORZRUD
SHDNLQJIDFWRURIFDQSURGXFHDORZHUVHZHUIORZUDWHZKLFKZRXOGEH
DSSURSULDWHIRUDWUXQNPDLQSLSHVL]LQJHYDOXDWLRQ7KLVZRXOGSURYLGHDGGLWLRQDO
SLSHFDSDFLW\ZLWKLQWKHVHZHUSLSHPDLQ$QDSSOLHGSHDNLQJIDFWRURI
ZRXOGHTXDWHWRFIVG'DQG9 ISVZKLFKVDWLVILHVWKHSLSH
FDUU\LQJFDSDFLW\
dd,D Edϭ
W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^;zs ͘t >>/E'hE/d^Ϳdd,D EdηϭWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬh WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞYYY&ĂĐƚŽƌYYYsŝƐƚĂ ŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴϯϱϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϮϭ͕Ϯϳϱ Ϭ͘ϭϮϭϯ Ϭ͘ϭϴϳϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϵϰ͕ϭϰϰ Ϭ͘ϯϵϰϭ Ϭ͘ϲϬϵϴ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϭϯϯ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϰϲ͕Ϭϴϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϲϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϭϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϰϵ͕ϳϳϱ Ϭ͘ϭϰϵϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϯϭϳ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϮϲϲ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϵϮ͕ϭϲϵ Ϭ͘ϬϵϮϮ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵϵ͕ϱϰϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϵϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϲϯϱ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůϯϵϵ ϭϯϴ͕Ϯϱϰ Ϭ͘ϭϯϴϯ Ϭ͘Ϯϭϯϵ ϰϰϵ͕ϯϮϰ Ϭ͘ϰϰϵϯ Ϭ͘ϲϵϱϮŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂϳϰϵ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ Ϯϱϵ͕ϱϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϱϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϰϯ͕ϰϲϴ Ϭ͘ϴϰϯϱ ϭ͘ϯϬϱϬ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;&ůŽǁŝŶŐ ĂƐƚͿϰϴϯ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϲϳ͕ϯϲϬ Ϭ͘ϭϲϳϰ Ϭ͘Ϯϱϴϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϰϯ͕ϵϭϴ Ϭ͘ϱϰϯϵ Ϭ͘ϴϰϭϲ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;&ůŽǁŝŶŐtĞƐƚͿϮϲϲ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϵϮ͕ϭϲϵ Ϭ͘ϬϵϮϮ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵϵ͕ϱϰϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϵϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϲϯϱ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůϳϰϵ Ϯϱϵ͕ϱϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϯϱϵϱ Ϭ͘ϰϬϭϲ ϴϰϯ͕ϰϲϴ Ϭ͘ϴϰϯϱ ϭ͘ϯϬϱϬWůĂƚŝŶƵŵ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͬsŝƐƚĂǀƐ͘DĂƌƐŚĂůΘ<>WůĂŶсϳϰϵͲϲϰϳснϭϬϮhϭϬϮ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϯϱ͕ϯϰϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϱϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϰϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϰ͕ϴϲϱ Ϭ͘ϭϭϰϵ Ϭ͘ϭϳϳϳ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲ͘EŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJǀĞǁĞůůŝŶŐhŶŝƚƐϭϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϭŽĨϵ
dd,D EdϮ
W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^;zdKd>EhD ZK& ZKKD^Ϳdd,D EdηϮWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬh WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ WĞƌƐŽŶƐ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y YsŝƐƚĂ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐϯϬ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϯϬ͘ϬϬ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϯ͕ϭϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕Ϯϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϱϴϭϱϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϵϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϮϬ͕Ϭϴϭ Ϭ͘ϬϮϬϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲϱ͕Ϯϲϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϱϯ Ϭ͘ϭϬϭϬϭϱϵ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱϳ͘ϳϱ ϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϯϳ͕ϱϲϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϳϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϴϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϮϮ͕ϬϴϮ Ϭ͘ϭϮϮϭ Ϭ͘ϭϴϴϵϴ ϯ͘ϯϬ Ϯϲ͘ϰϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ Ϯ͕ϳϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͕ϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϬϬ͘Ϭϭϯϵ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϱϬ ϲϬϱ͘ϰϬϲϯ͕ϱϲϳ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϯϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϵϴϰ ϮϬϲ͕ϱϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϬϲϲ Ϭ͘ϯϭϵϲ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJϴ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϴ͘ϬϬ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϴϰϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϳϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϮϭϵϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϴ͘ϳϱ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ Ϯϱ͕Ϭϲϵ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϴϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϭ͕ϰϳϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϭϱ Ϭ͘ϭϮϲϭϭϱϮ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϰϮ͘ϬϬϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϯϱ͕ϵϭϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϱϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϱϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϲ͕ϳϬϴ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϳ Ϭ͘ϭϴϬϲϯϵ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϭϮϴ͘ϳϬϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϯ͕ϱϭϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϮϬϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϯ͕ϵϭϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϯϵ Ϭ͘ϬϲϴϬϵ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϯϯ͘ϯϬϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿϭϬϱ ϯ͕ϰϵϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭ͕ϯϲϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϳϲ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϵϵ ϳϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϳϴ͕ϴϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϴϴ Ϭ͘ϭϮϮϬ Ϯϱϲ͕ϭϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϱϲϮ Ϭ͘ϯϵϲϰŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ϳϰϵ ϭϯϱϲ͘ϭϱ ĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϰϮ͕ϯϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϰ Ϭ͘ϮϮϬϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϲϮ͕ϳϴϲ Ϭ͘ϰϲϮϴ Ϭ͘ϳϭϲϬ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲEŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵƐϮϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϮŽĨϵ
W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^;zdKd>EhD ZK& ZKKD^Ϳdd,D EdηϮWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬh WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ WĞƌƐŽŶƐ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y YŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϮ͘ϲϳ ϭ͘ϬϬ Ϯ͘ϲϳ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϮϴϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵϭϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰϮͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϱ͘ϯϯ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϱ͘ϯϯ ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϭϬϱ ϱϲϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϴϮϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϴϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϲϯ͘ϲϳ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϳϵ͘ϱϴ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϴ͕ϯϱϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϴϰ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϳ͕ϭϱϴ Ϭ͘ϬϮϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϰϮϬϮͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϭϮϳ͘ϯϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱϵ͘ϭϳ ϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϲ͕ϳϭϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϰ͕ϯϭϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϴϰϬϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϱϬ͘ϲϳ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϰ͘ϬϬϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϭϭ͕ϵϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϴϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϴ͕ϵϬϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϴϵ Ϭ͘ϬϲϬϮϮͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϭϬϭ͘ϯϯ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϮϮϴ͘ϬϬϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ Ϯϯ͕ϵϰϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϯϵ Ϭ͘ϬϯϳϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϳ͕ϴϬϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϳϴ Ϭ͘ϭϮϬϰϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϭϯ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϰϮ͘ϵϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϰ͕ϱϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϰ͕ϲϰϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϮϮϳϮͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϮϲ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϴϱ͘ϴϬ ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϬϱ ϵ͕ϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵ͕Ϯϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϮϵϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϱϯϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϯ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϭϭ͘ϭϬϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿϭϬϱ ϭ͕ϭϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϳϴϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϵϮͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϲ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϮϮ͘ϮϬϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿϭϬϱ Ϯ͕ϯϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳ͕ϱϳϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϳ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ϯϵϵ͘ϬϬϳϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϳϴ͕ϴϮϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϴϴ Ϭ͘ϭϮϮϬ Ϯϱϲ͕ϭϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϱϲϮ Ϭ͘ϯϵϲϰϭͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϭϯϯ͘ϬϬϮϱϬ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϲ͕Ϯϳϲ Ϭ͘ϬϮϲϯ Ϭ͘ϬϰϬϳ ϴϱ͕ϯϵϴ Ϭ͘ϬϴϱϰϬ͘ϭϯϮϭϮͬϯ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿϮϲϲ͘ϬϬϱϬϬ͘ϱϬϱϮ͕ϱϱϯ Ϭ͘ϬϱϮϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϭϯ ϭϳϬ͕ϳϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϳϬϴ Ϭ͘Ϯϲϰϯ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ ϯϵϵ͘ϬϬϳϱϬ͘ϳϱ ϳϴ͕ϴϮϵ Ϭ͘ϬϳϴϴϬ͘ϭϮϮϬϮϱϲ͕ϭϵϯ Ϭ͘ϮϱϲϮ Ϭ͘ϯϵϲϰ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJнsŝƐƚĂϰϴϯ͘ϬϬϴϱϱ͘ϲϱ ϴϵ͕ϴϰϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϵϴ Ϭ͘ϭϯϵϬϮϵϭ͕ϵϵϭ Ϭ͘ϮϵϮϬϬ͘ϰϱϭϴ;^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴͿ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJϮϲϲ͘ϬϬϱϬϬ͘ϱϬϱϮ͕ϱϱϯ Ϭ͘ϬϱϮϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϴϭϯ ϭϳϬ͕ϳϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϳϬϴ Ϭ͘ϮϲϰϯŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂdŽƚĂů ϳϰϵ͘ϬϬϭϯϱϲ͘ϭϱ ϭϰϮ͕ϯϵϲ Ϭ͘ϭϰϮϰϬ͘ϮϮϬϯ ϰϲϮ͕ϳϴϲ Ϭ͘ϰϲϮϴϬ͘ϳϭϲϬ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲEŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵƐϮϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϯŽĨϵ
W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^;zdKd>EhD ZK& ZKKD^Ϳdd,D EdηϮWůĂƚŝŶƵŵsŝƐƚĂ ηhŶŝƚƐ dŽƚĂůηĞĚƌŽŽŵWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬĞĚͲƌŽŽŵhŶŝƚWĞƌƐŽŶƐ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϯϬ ϯϬ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϯϬ͘ϬϬϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϱϯ ϭϱϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϵϭ͘ϮϱϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϱϵ ϯϭϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϱϳ͘ϳϱϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϴ Ϯϰ ϯ͘ϯϬ Ϯϲ͘ϰϬ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϯϱϬ ϱϮϱ ϲϬϱ͘ϰϬWůĂƚŝŶƵŵ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ^ƚƵĚŝŽ ϴ ϴ ϭ͘ϬϬ ϴ͘ϬϬϭĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϵϭ ϭϵϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϯϴ͘ϳϱϮĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϭϱϮ ϯϬϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϰϮ͘ϬϬϯĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϯϵ ϭϭϳ ϯ͘ϯϬ ϭϮϴ͘ϳϬϰĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯĞĚƌŽŽŵͲ>ŽĨƚͿ ϵ ϯϲ ϯ͘ϳϬ ϯϯ͘ϯϬ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϯϵϵ ϲϱϲ ϳϱϬ͘ϳϱdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵ ϳϰϵ ϭϭϴϭ ϭ͕ϯϱϲ͘ϭϱdŚĞƐĞηŽĨƵŶŝƚƐĂŶĚƚŽƚĂůďĞĚƌŽŽŵĐŽƵŶƚĐŽŵĞƐĨƌŽŵƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƐKƌĂŶŐĞĐŽŶĐĞƉƚƵĂůĂƌĐŚŝƚĞĐƚƵƌĂůƉůĂŶƐƚŝƚůĞƐŚĞĞƚƐĨŽƌďŽƚŚWůĂƚŝŶƵŵ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂdŚĞhͬĞĚƌŽŽŵhŶŝƚ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐĐŽŵĞĨƌŽŵƚŚĞŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƚƚĂĐŚŵĞŶƚϯƚĂďůĞ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJdŽƚĂůĞĚƌŽŽŵƐϮϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϰŽĨϵ
dd,D Edϯ
W>d/EhD'd tzs/^d^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^&KZWZKWK^ DZ^,>>E<>WZKW Zd/ ^;zs ͘t >>/E'hE/d^Ϳdd,D EdηϯKƌŝŐŝŶĂůDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞĂWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬhŽƌ^& WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y YDĂƌƐŚĂůů;sŝƐƚĂͿ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐϯϮϳ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϭϯ͕ϯϬϲ Ϭ͘ϭϭϯϯ Ϭ͘ϭϳϱϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϲϴ͕Ϯϰϯ Ϭ͘ϯϲϴϮ Ϭ͘ϱϲϵϴϵ͕ϱϬϬ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ ϭ͕ϵϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϲ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůϭϭϱ͕ϮϬϲ Ϭ͘ϭϭϱϮ Ϭ͘ϭϳϴϮ ϯϳϰ͕ϰϭϴ Ϭ͘ϯϳϰϰ Ϭ͘ϱϳϵϯ<ͬ>;'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͿϯϮϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϭϬ͕ϴϴϬ Ϭ͘ϭϭϬϵ Ϭ͘ϭϳϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϲϬ͕ϯϲϬ Ϭ͘ϯϲϬϰ Ϭ͘ϱϱϳϲϮϬϵ͕ϰϭϵ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ KĨĨŝĐĞͬZĞƐƚ͘ ϰϭ͕ϴϴϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϭϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϰϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯϲ͕ϭϮϮ Ϭ͘ϭϯϲϭ Ϭ͘ϮϭϬϲZŽŽŵƐϭϯϴ͘ϬϬϭϬϰ͕ϲϬϰ ƐĨ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ͍,ŽƚĞů;ĞĚƌŽŽŵƐͿ ϭϱϬ ϰϲ͕ϱϳϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϳϮϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱϭ͕ϯϲϵ Ϭ͘ϭϱϭϰ Ϭ͘ϮϯϰϮƐĨŽĨĨůŽŽƌƐƉĂĐĞϭϲ͕ϲϴϱ͘ϬϬϭϬϰ͕ϲϬϰ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ͍,ŽƚĞů;KĨĨͬZĞƚĂŝůͬZĞƐƚ͘Ϳ ϯ͕ϯϯϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕ϴϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϴ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϴ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůϮϬϮ͕ϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϯϭϯϲ ϲϱϴ͕ϲϵϲ Ϭ͘ϲϱϴϳ ϭ͘ϬϭϵϮ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴнϮϴ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂϲϰϳ ϯ͘ϯŽŶĚŽKŶůLJϭϬϱ ϮϮϰ͕ϭϴϲ Ϭ͘ϮϮϰϮ Ϭ͘ϯϰϲϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϮϴ͕ϲϬϯ Ϭ͘ϳϮϴϲ ϭ͘ϭϮϳϯ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴнϮϴ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ϯ͘ϯ ůů ϭϬϱϯϭϳ͕ϴϴϭ Ϭ͘ϯϭϳϵ Ϭ͘ϰϵϭϴ ϯ͘ϯ ϭ͕Ϭϯϯ͕ϭϭϰ ϭ͘Ϭϯϯϭ ϭ͘ϱϵϴϱ<ͬ>;'ĂƚĞǁĂLJͿŝǀŝĚĞĚ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϭϬϲ͘ϲϳ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϯϲ͕ϵϲϬ Ϭ͘ϬϯϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϱϳϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϮϬ͕ϭϮϬ Ϭ͘ϭϮϬϭ Ϭ͘ϭϴϱϵ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϮϭϯ͘ϯϯ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϳϯ͕ϵϮϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϯϵ Ϭ͘ϭϭϰϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϮϰϬ͕ϮϰϬ Ϭ͘ϮϰϬϮ Ϭ͘ϯϳϭϳ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϲϵ͕ϴϬϲ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ KĨĨŝĐĞͬZĞƐƚ͘ ϭϬϱ ϭϯ͕ϵϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϭϰϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϱ͕ϯϳϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϱϰ Ϭ͘ϬϳϬϮ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϭϯϵ͕ϲϭϯ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ ŐͬƐĨͬĚ KĨĨŝĐĞͬZĞƐƚ͘ ϭϬϱ Ϯϳ͕ϵϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϮϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϰϯϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵϬ͕ϳϰϴ Ϭ͘ϬϵϬϳ Ϭ͘ϭϰϬϰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϰϲϯϰ͕ϴϲϴ ƐĨ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ͍,ŽƚĞů;ĞĚƌŽŽŵƐͿ ϭϱϬ ϭϱ͕ϱϮϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϱϱ Ϭ͘ϬϮϰϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϬ͕ϰϱϲ Ϭ͘ϬϱϬϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϴϭ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϵϮϲϵ͕ϳϯϲ ƐĨ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ͍,ŽƚĞů;ĞĚƌŽŽŵƐͿ ϭϱϬ ϯϭ͕ϬϱϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϰϴϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϬ͕ϵϭϯ Ϭ͘ϭϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϭϱϲϭ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϱ͕ϱϲϭ͘ϲϳϯϰ͕ϴϲϴ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ͍,ŽƚĞů;KĨĨͬZĞƚĂŝůͬZĞƐƚ͘Ϳ ϭ͕ϭϭϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϲϭϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϲ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿ ϭϭ͕ϭϮϯ͘ϯϯϲϵ͕ϳϯϲ ƐĨ Ϭ͘Ϯ͍,ŽƚĞů;KĨĨͬZĞƚĂŝůͬZĞƐƚ͘Ϳ Ϯ͕ϮϮϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳ͕ϮϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϮ Ϭ͘ϬϭϭϮ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůϮϬϮ͕ϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϯϭϯϲ ϲϱϴ͕ϲϵϲ Ϭ͘ϲϱϴϳ ϭ͘ϬϭϵϮ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϭͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϲϳ͕ϱϱϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϭϬϰϱ Ϯϭϵ͕ϱϲϱ Ϭ͘Ϯϭϵϲ Ϭ͘ϯϯϵϳ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴ;ϮͬϯWƌŽũĞĐƚ^ŝƚĞͿϭϯϱ͕ϭϭϳ Ϭ͘ϭϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϮϬϵϭ ϰϯϵ͕ϭϯϭ Ϭ͘ϰϯϵϭ Ϭ͘ϲϳϵϰ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂůϮϬϮ͕ϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϯϭϯϲ ϲϱϴ͕ϲϵϲ Ϭ͘ϲϱϴϳ ϭ͘ϬϭϵϮ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJнsŝƐƚĂ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴŽŶůLJϭϴϮ͕ϳϲϰ Ϭ͘ϭϴϮϴ Ϭ͘ϮϴϮϴ ϱϵϯ͕ϵϴϯ Ϭ͘ϱϵϰϬ Ϭ͘ϵϭϵϬ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴŽŶůLJϭϯϱ͕ϭϭϳ Ϭ͘ϭϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϮϬϵϭ ϰϯϵ͕ϭϯϭ Ϭ͘ϰϯϵϭ Ϭ͘ϲϳϵϰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴнϮϴ ŽŵďŝŶĞĚ'ĂƚĞǁĂLJΘsŝƐƚĂ ůůϯϭϳ͕ϴϴϭ Ϭ͘ϯϭϳϵ Ϭ͘ϰϵϭϴ ϭ͕Ϭϯϯ͕ϭϭϰ ϭ͘Ϭϯϯϭ ϭ͘ϱϵϴϱ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲ͘,ŽǁƚŽĐŽŶǀĞƌƚ,ŽƚĞůďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ^&ƚŽηŽĨƌŽŽŵƐĂŶĚĂĨůŽǁƌĂƚĞ͍ƐƐƵŵĞĚ͗ƵƐĞĚĞƋƵŝǀĂůĞŶƚƐƚƵĚŝŽсϱϱϬƐĨͬƵŶŝƚΘϮ͘ϮϱƉĞƌĐĂƉŝƚĂͬƵŶŝƚΘϭϱϬŐƉĐĚEŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘ϮϱKƌŝŐŝŶĂůDĂƐŚĂůůΘ<>WƌŽƉĞƌƚLJĚĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚĂŐƌĞĞŵĞŶƚĚǁĞůůŝŶŐƵŶŝƚƐΘďƵŝůĚŝŶŐ^&ĨƌŽŵ:ĂĐŬƐŽŶͬĞDĂƌĐŽͬdŝĚƵƐWĞĐŬĞŶƉĂƵŐŚDĞŵŽƌĂŶĚƵŵĚĂƚĞĚ͗ϬϯͬϭϯͬϭϮ͕ƉĂŐĞϯΘϱ͘^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰǀĞhDĂƌƐŚĂůůΘ<>WƌŽƉϯϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϱŽĨϵ
dd,D Edϰ
W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d ZW>EK&^ t Z^, ^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^&KZDK >Z Ϯϴ;zs ͘t >>/E'hE/d^Ϳdd,D EdηϰWůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚƌĞĂϮϴWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬhŽƌ^& WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ hŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐ;^ŝƚĞηϭͿ ŐƉĐĚͬhŽƌ^& ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐϯϵϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϱ͕ϭϯϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϭϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϮϬϵϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϯϵ͕ϭϴϴ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϰϯϵϮ Ϭ͘ϲϳϵϱϳϴϯϵ ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϲϮϵ͘ϰϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕Ϭϰϱ͘ϳϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϮϮϴϮϬ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϮϮϲ͘ϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϯϱ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϭϯϱ͕ϵϵϬ͘ϵϮ Ϭ͘ϭϯϲϬ Ϭ͘ϮϭϬϰ ϰϰϭ͕ϵϳϬ͘ϰϴ Ϭ͘ϰϰϮϬϬ͘ϲϴϯϴ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵWĂƌŬƉĂƌƚŵĞŶƚƐΘ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵůƵďŽŶĚŽƐ;^ŝƚĞηϰͿϳϳϭ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ Ϯϲϳ͕ϭϱϭ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϮϲϳϮ Ϭ͘ϰϭϯϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϲϴ͕ϮϰϮ͘ϯϴ Ϭ͘ϴϲϴϮ ϭ͘ϯϰϯϰWůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚ;^ŝƚĞηϳͿϯϯϲ ϯ͘ϯ &ůĂƚƐ ϭϬϱ ϭϭϲ͕ϰϮϰ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϰ Ϭ͘ϭϴϬϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϳϴ͕ϯϳϴ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϯϳϴϰϬ͘ϱϴϱϰϭϮϰϴ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϭϬϬ͘Ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯϮϱ͘ϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϱ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϭϭϲ͕ϱϮϰ͘Ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϱ Ϭ͘ϭϴϬϯ ϯϳϴ͕ϳϬϯ͘ϳϬ Ϭ͘ϯϳϴϳ Ϭ͘ϱϴϱϵ>ĞŶŶĂƌΖƐͲdŽǁŶDĞƚƌŽ;^ŝƚĞηϵͿϮϲϴϭ ϯ͘ϯ ZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂů ϭϬϱ ϵϮϴ͕ϵϲϲ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϵϮϵϬ ϭ͘ϰϯϳϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϭϵ͕ϭϰϭ͘ϭϯ ϯ͘Ϭϭϵϭ ϰ͘ϲϳϭϯϮϮϵ͕ϴϬϬ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϭϴ͕ϰϱϮ͘ϵϰ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϴϱ Ϭ͘ϬϮϴϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϵ͕ϵϳϮ͘Ϭϲ Ϭ͘ϬϲϬϬϬ͘ϬϵϮϴ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϵϰϳ͕ϰϭϵ͘ϰϰ Ϭ͘ϵϰϳϰ ϭ͘ϰϲϱϵ ϯ͕Ϭϳϵ͕ϭϭϯ͘ϭϴ ϯ͘Ϭϳϵϭ ϰ͘ϳϲϰϭtƌŝŐŚƚŝƌĐůĞWƌŽƉŽƐĂů;^ŝƚĞηϭϬͿϲϬ ϯ͘ϯ ŽŶĚŽ ϭϬϱ ϮϬ͕ϳϵϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϯϮϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲϳ͕ϱϲϳ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϲϳϲ Ϭ͘ϭϬϰϱŽŵďŝŶĞĚ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϭ͕ϰϴϳ͕ϴϳϲ͘Ϭϳ ϭ͘ϰϴϳϵ Ϯ͘ϯϬϮϭ ϰ͕ϴϯϱ͕ϱϵϳ͘Ϯϯ ϰ͘ϴϯϱϲ ϳ͘ϰϴϭϴ/ŶĐůƵĚŝŶŐKƌŝŐŝŶĂůDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶĞǀĞůŽƉŵĞŶƚƌĞĂĨƌŽŵDĂƌƐŚĂůůΘ<>WƌŽƉĞƌƚŝĞƐ^ĞǁĞƌ^ŚĞĚϮϴϭϴϮ͕ϳϲϰ͘ϭϬ Ϭ͘ϭϴϮϴ Ϭ͘ϮϴϮϴ ϱϵϯ͕ϵϴϯ͘ϯϯ Ϭ͘ϱϵϰϬ Ϭ͘ϵϭϵϬŽŵďŝŶĞĚdŽƚĂů ϭ͕ϲϳϬ͕ϲϰϬ͘ϭϳ ϭ͘ϲϳϬϲ Ϯ͘ϱϴϰϵ ϱ͕ϰϮϵ͕ϱϴϬ͘ϱϲ ϱ͘ϰϮϵϲ ϴ͘ϰϬϬϴ;&ůŽǁZĂƚĞďĂƐĞĚŽŶŽŵďŝŶĞĚĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ^ƚƵĚLJ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲsŽů͘ϭͿ͕^ĞĞƉĂŐĞƐϱ͕ϴΘϭϲEŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘Ϯϱ>ŽĨƚƐͬ^ƚƵĚŝŽƐ;ϭWĞƌƐŽŶͬhͿKŶĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϭ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿdǁŽĞĚƌŽŽŵ;Ϯ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿdŚƌĞĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯ͘ϯϬWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿŝƚLJŽĨŶĂŚĞŝŵŽŵďŝŶĞĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ͕sŽů͘ϭ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲWƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ,ϮD,/>>ŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůͬZĞƚĂŝůͬKĨĨŝĐĞͬ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚ;ϯϱϬϬŐƉĚͬĂĐƌĞŽƌϬ͘ϬϴϬϯŐƉĚͬƐĨͿĂƐĞĚŽŶdĂďůĞϱ͗EŽŶͲZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗWƌĞǀŝŽƵƐĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵ^ƚƵĚŝĞƐhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗƉĂŐĞϴ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰLJǀĞǁĞůΖŐhŶŝƚƐ;WdDW^^ͿϰϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϲŽĨϵ
dd,D Edϱ
W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d Z^ t ZW>E^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^&KZKE^dZhd WKZd/KE^K&WZ<s/Z//E͕W>d/EhDdZ/E'> KEKD/E/hD^н^d/hD>K&d^;zdKd>EhD ZK& ZKKD^Ϳdd,D EdηϱŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJEĂŵĞWůĂŶEĂŵĞ ĞĚͬĂƚŚ^Ƌ͘&ƚ͘ EƵŵďĞƌŽĨhŶŝƚƐEƵŵďĞƌŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐƉĞƌhŶŝƚdŽƚĂůEƵŵďĞƌŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐƉĞƌhŶŝƚWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y YŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐWĂƌŬsŝƌŝĚŝĂŶͲϭϱϭϱ ͘<ĂƚĞůůĂǀĞŶƵĞ;ϯϮϬhŶŝƚƐͿ^ŝƚĞηϰ;,ĂůĨƚŚĞ^ŝƚĞŝƐĞǀĞůŽƉĞĚͿϭ ^ƚƵĚŝŽͬϭ ϱϱϴ ϯϮ ϭ ϯϮ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϯϯϲϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕ϵϮϬ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϵ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϵϭ͘ϭ ^ƚƵĚŝŽͬϭ ϱϴϲ ϴ ϭ ϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϴϰϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϳϯϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϮϭ͘Ϯ ^ƚƵĚŝŽͬϭ ϱϵϯ Ϯϰ ϭ Ϯϰ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϱϮϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴ͕ϭϵϬ Ϭ͘ϬϬϴϮ Ϭ͘ϬϭϮϳϮ ϭͬϭ ϲϳϰ ϵϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭϳ͘ϱϬϭϬϱ ϭϮϯϯϳ͘ϱϬϬ͘ϬϭϮϯ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϵϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϬ͕Ϭϵϳ Ϭ͘ϬϰϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϲϮϬϮ͘ϭ ϭͬϭ ϲϳϭ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲϮ͘Ϯ ϭͬϭ ϲϳϰ Ϯ ϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϲϮ͘ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϴϱϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯϯ ϭͬϭ ϳϱϱ ϴ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϱϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϰϭϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰϬ͘ϬϬϱϯϯ͘ϭ ϭͬϭ ϳϲϬ Ϯϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϯϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϯϭϱϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͕Ϯϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϭϬϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϱϴϰ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϮ ϲϵ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱϱ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϲϯϬϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϯ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱϮ͕ϵϳϵ Ϭ͘ϬϱϯϬϬ͘ϬϴϮϬϰ͘ϭ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϰ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴϰ͘Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϭϭϰ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱϰ͘ϯ ϮͬϮ ϵϳϮ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴϰ͘ϰ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϭϱϱ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴϰ͘ϱ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϮ ϳ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱ͘ϳϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϲϱϯ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͕ϯϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϰϬ͘ϬϬϴϯϰ͘ϲ ϮͬϮ ϵϵϰ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴϱ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϬϴ ϭϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϬ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϰϮϱϮ͘ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯ͕ϴϮϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϯϴ Ϭ͘ϬϮϭϰϱ͘Ϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϬϴ ϲ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϰϭϳ͘ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϲϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϭ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϮϬ ϱϬϴ͘ϬϬϱϯ͕ϯϰϬ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘Ϭϱϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϴϮϱ ϭϳϯ͕ϯϱϱ͘ϬϬ Ϭ͘ϭϳϯϰϬ͘ϮϲϴϮ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰ džŝƐƚΖŐĞǀĞůKWΖƚ^ĞǁĞƌ&ůŽǁϱϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϳŽĨϵ
W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d Z^ t ZW>E^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^&KZKE^dZhd WKZd/KE^K&WZ<s/Z//E͕W>d/EhDdZ/E'> KEKD/E/hD^н^d/hD>K&d^;zdKd>EhD ZK& ZKKD^Ϳdd,D EdηϱŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJEĂŵĞWůĂŶEĂŵĞ ĞĚͬĂƚŚ^Ƌ͘&ƚ͘ EƵŵďĞƌŽĨhŶŝƚƐEƵŵďĞƌŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐƉĞƌhŶŝƚdŽƚĂůEƵŵďĞƌŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐƉĞƌhŶŝƚWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y YŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐWůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵƐͲϭϯϯϭ ͘<ĂƚĞůůĂǀĞŶƵĞ;ϵϮhŶŝƚƐͿ^ŝƚĞηϳϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϯϴ ϯ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͘ϳϱ ϭϬϱ ϳϬϴ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϯϬϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲϭ> ϯͬϮ ϭ͕ϱϵϵ ϭϬ ϯ͘ϯ ϯϯ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϯϰϲϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϭ͕Ϯϲϭ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϯ Ϭ͘ϬϭϳϰϮ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϰϲϭ ϲ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϯ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϰϭϳ͘ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϲϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϭϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϭϲϰ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱϭ> ϯͬϮ ϭ͕Ϯϳϯ ϴ ϯ͘ϯ Ϯϲ͘ϰϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϳϳϮ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͕ϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϬϬ͘Ϭϭϯϵϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϰϯ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴϯ> ϯͬϮ ϭ͕ϱϲϱ ϰ ϯ͘ϯ ϭϯ͘ϮϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϴϲ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϱϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϬϰ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϲϰ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴϰ> ϯͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϰϵ ϰ ϯ͘ϯ ϭϯ͘ϮϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϴϲ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͕ϱϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϬϭ ϭͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϭϮ ϴ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϱϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϰϭϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰϬ͘ϬϬϱϯϭ>ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϭϳϱ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱϭ ϭͬϭ ϳϰϰ ϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϮϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰϬ͘ϬϬϬϳϮ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϮϵ ϭ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ Ϯϯϲ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϲϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϮϮ>ϯͬϮ͘ ϭ͕ϮϬϬ Ϯ ϯ͘ϯ ϲ͘ϲϬ ϭϬϱ ϲϵϯ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϮϱϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϱ ϭ ϭͬϭ͘ϱ ϴϳϯ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ ϭ>Ϯͬϭ͘ϱ ϭ͕Ϭϲϲ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ&ϭ ϭͬϭ͘ ϳϰϯ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲ&ϭ> Ϯͬϭ͘ ϵϭϮ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ'> ϯͬϮ͘ ϭ͕ϵϲϮ Ϯ ϯ͘ϯ ϲ͘ϲϬ ϭϬϱ ϲϵϯ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕ϮϱϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϱ:ϭ ϭͬϭ͘ϱ ϭ͕ϭϲϱ ϭ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϱ ϭϯϭ͘Ϯϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϮϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰϬ͘ϬϬϬϳ<ϭ>Ϯͬϭ͘ϱ ϭ͕ϮϭϬ Ϯ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰ͘ϱϬ ϭϬϱ ϰϳϮ͘ϱϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϱϯϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϰ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϵϮ ϮϮϬ͘ϱϬϮϯ͕ϭϱϮ͘ϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϯϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϯϱϴ ϳϱ͕Ϯϰϱ͘ϲϯ Ϭ͘ϬϳϱϮ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϰWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬhŽƌ^&WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y YWůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵƐ;^ŝƚĞηϳͿ ŐƉĐĚͬhŽƌ^& ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐϭϮϰϴ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϭϬϬ͘Ϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϯ͘Ϭ ϮϬϬ͘ϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϯWůĂƚŝŶƵŵdƌŝĂŶŐůĞŽŶĚŽŵŝŶŝƵŵƐ;^ŝƚĞηϳͿ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů Ϯϯ͕ϮϱϮ͘ϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϮϯϯ Ϭ͘ϬϯϲϬ ϳϱ͕ϰϰϲ͘Ϭϱ Ϭ͘Ϭϳϱϰ Ϭ͘ϭϭϲϳ^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰ džŝƐƚΖŐĞǀĞůKWΖƚ^ĞǁĞƌ&ůŽǁϱϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϴŽĨϵ
W>d/EhDdZ/E'> D^d Z^ t ZW>E^ t Z' E Zd/KEZd ^&KZKE^dZhd WKZd/KE^K&WZ<s/Z//E͕W>d/EhDdZ/E'> KEKD/E/hD^н^d/hD>K&d^;zdKd>EhD ZK& ZKKD^Ϳdd,D EdηϱŽŵŵƵŶŝƚLJEĂŵĞWůĂŶEĂŵĞ ĞĚͬĂƚŚ^Ƌ͘&ƚ͘ EƵŵďĞƌŽĨhŶŝƚƐEƵŵďĞƌŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐƉĞƌhŶŝƚdŽƚĂůEƵŵďĞƌŽĨWĞƌƐŽŶƐƉĞƌhŶŝƚWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y YŐƉĐĚͬh ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐʹϭϴϬϭ ͘<ĂƚĞůůĂǀĞŶƵĞ;ϯϵϬhŶŝƚƐͿ^ŝƚĞηϭ;ŽŶĚŽŵŝŶƵŵƐͿϭ ϭͬϭ ϲϱϭ ϯϵ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϰϴ͘ϳϱ ϭϬϱ ϱϭϭϴ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϲ͕ϲϯϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϲϲ Ϭ͘ϬϮϱϳϭ ϭͬϭ ϳϮϲ ϰ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲϭ> >ŽĨƚͬϭ ϳϮϲ ϱ ϭ ϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϱϮϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϴ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϳϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϲϭy ϭͬϭ ϳϬϱ ϭϮ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϱϳϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͕ϭϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϵϮ ϭͬϭ ϳϮϴ ϵϲ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϮϬ͘ϬϬϭϬϱ ϭϮϲϬϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϭϮϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϵϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϰϬ͕ϵϱϬ Ϭ͘ϬϰϭϬϬ͘ϬϲϯϰϮ ϭͬϭ ϳϴϰ ϭϮ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϱ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϱϳϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϱ͕ϭϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϱϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϵϮ> >ŽĨƚͬϭ ϳϴϰ ϮϮ ϭ ϮϮ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϮϯϭϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϮϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳ͕ϱϬϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϭϭϲϮ>D ϭͬϭ͘ϱ ϵϴϳ ϴ ϭ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϬϱϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕ϰϭϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϰϬ͘ϬϬϱϯϯ >ŽĨƚͬϭ ϱϱϬ ϰ ϭ ϰ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϰϮϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϰ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭ͕ϯϲϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϰϬ͘ϬϬϮϭϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϲϮ ϯϮ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϮ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϳϱϲϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϳϲ Ϭ͘Ϭϭϭϳ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϰ͕ϱϳϬ Ϭ͘ϬϮϰϲ Ϭ͘ϬϯϴϬϮ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϬϴϮ ϭϯϮ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯϵϳ͘ϬϬϭϬϱ ϯϭϭϴϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϯϭϮ Ϭ͘Ϭϰϴϯ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϬϭ͕ϯϱϭ Ϭ͘ϭϬϭϰϬ͘ϭϱϲϴϮ>D ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϮϬϵ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴϯ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϮϬϳ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱϭ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕Ϯϵϵ ϴ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϭϴ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϭϴϵϬ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϭϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϵ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϲ͕ϭϰϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϲϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϵϱϮ ϮͬϮ ϭ͕ϯϵϴ ϰ Ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϵ͘ϬϬ ϭϬϱ ϵϰϱ͘ϬϬϬ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϱ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϯ͕Ϭϳϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϯϭ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϴ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϯϵϬ ϲϲϳ͘ϳϱ ϳϬ͕ϭϭϯ͘ϳϱ Ϭ͘ϬϳϬϭ Ϭ͘ϭϬϴϱ ϮϮϳ͕ϴϲϵ͘ϲϵ Ϭ͘ϮϮϳϵ Ϭ͘ϯϱϮϲWĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬ WĞĂŬhŽƌ^&WĞƌĂƉŝƚĂƉĞƌhŶŝƚdLJƉĞhŶŝƚdLJƉĞ ZĂƚĞ Y Y Y &ĂĐƚŽƌ Y Y Y^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐ;^ŝƚĞηϭͿ ŐƉĐĚͬhŽƌ^& ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐ ŐƉĚ DŐĚ ĐĨƐϳϴϯϵ ZĞƐƚĂƵƌĂŶƚ Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϲϮϵ͘ϰϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϲ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϬ ϯ͘Ϯϱ Ϯ͕Ϭϰϱ͘ϳϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϬϬ͘ϬϬϯϮϮϴϮϬ ZĞƚĂŝů Ϭ͘ϬϴϬϯ ϮϮϲ͘ϰϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϰ ϯ͘Ϯϱ ϳϯϱ͘ϵϱ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϳ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϭ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϴϱϱ͘ϵϮ Ϭ͘ϬϬϬϵ Ϭ͘ϬϬϭϯ Ϯ͕ϳϴϭ͘ϳϯ Ϭ͘ϬϬϮϴ Ϭ͘ϬϬϰϯ^ƚĂĚŝƵŵ>ŽĨƚƐ;^ŝƚĞηϭͿ ^ƵďͲdŽƚĂů ϳϬ͕ϵϲϵ͘ϲϳ Ϭ͘ϬϳϭϬ Ϭ͘ϭϬϵϴ ϮϯϬ͕ϲϱϭ͘ϰϮ Ϭ͘ϮϯϬϳ Ϭ͘ϯϱϲϵdŽƚĂů ϴϬϮ ϭϯϵϲ͘Ϯϱ ϭϰϳ͕ϱϲϮ͘ϯϴ Ϭ͘ϭϰϳϲ Ϭ͘ϮϮϴϯ ϰϳϵ͕ϰϱϮ͘ϰϳ Ϭ͘ϰϳϵϱ Ϭ͘ϳϰϭϴEŽƚĞ͗>ŽĨƚƐͬ^ƚƵĚŝŽƐ;ϭWĞƌƐŽŶͬhͿKŶĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϭ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿdǁŽĞĚƌŽŽŵ;Ϯ͘ϮϱWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿdŚƌĞĞĞĚƌŽŽŵ;ϯ͘ϯϬWĞƌƐŽŶƐͬhͿEŽƚĞ͗WĞĂŬ&ĂĐƚŽƌсϯ͘ϮϱŽŵŵĞƌĐŝĂůͬZĞƚĂŝůͬKĨĨŝĐĞͬ'ŽǀĞƌŶŵĞŶƚ;ϯϱϬϬŐƉĚͬĂĐƌĞŽƌϬ͘ϬϴϬϯŐƉĚͬƐĨͿĂƐĞĚŽŶdĂďůĞϱ͗EŽŶͲZĞƐŝĚĞŶƚŝĂůhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗWƌĞǀŝŽƵƐĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵ^ƚƵĚŝĞƐhŶŝƚ&ůŽǁ&ĂĐƚŽƌƐΗƉĂŐĞϴŝƚLJŽĨŶĂŚĞŝŵŽŵďŝŶĞĞŶƚƌĂůŶĂŚĞŝŵƌĞĂDĂƐƚĞƌWůĂŶŽĨ^ĂŶŝƚĂƌLJ^ĞǁĞƌƐ͕sŽů͘ϭ^ĞƉƚ͘ϮϬϬϲWƌĞƉĂƌĞĚďLJ,ϮD,/>>^͗ͰϭϮϬϭϰϰͰĚŵŝŶͰZĞƉŽƌƚƐͰ^ĞǁĞƌ^ƚƵĚLJͰ^ĞǁĞƌ'ĞŶĞƌĂƚŝŽŶZĂƚĞƐ͘džůƐͰ džŝƐƚΖŐĞǀĞůKWΖƚ^ĞǁĞƌ&ůŽǁϱϭϭͬϭͬϮϬϭϮͬϭϬ͗ϯϭDϵŽĨϵ
dd,D Edϲ
dd,D Edϳ
CITY OF ANAHIEM, CAPLATINUM GATEWAY AND PLATINUM VISTACONCEPTUALSEWER CONCEPTTO KATELLA AVE.LEGEND:
ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO
THE REVISED PLATINUM TRIANGLE
EXPANSION PROJECT
FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT NO. 339
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO.
2004121045
PREPARED FOR THE
PLATINUM GATEWAY
PROJECT
Volume I
Prepared for:
City of Anaheim
Planning Department
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
Prepared by:
Templeton Planning Group
20250 Acacia Street, Suite 260
Newport Beach, CA 92660
December 3, 2012
ADDENDUM NO. 2 TO
THE REVISED PLATINUM TRIANGLE
EXPANSION PROJECT
FINAL SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
REPORT NO. 339
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 2004121045
PREPARED FOR THE
PLATINUM GATEWAY PROJECT
Lead Agency:
CITY OF ANAHEIM
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92805
Contact: Vanessa Norwood, Associate Planner
(714) 765-4934
Prepared By:
TEMPLETON PLANNING GROUP
20250 Acacia Street, Suite 260
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Contact: Vanessa Yee, Senior Project Manager
(949) 724-0640
DECEMBER 3, 2012
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
i
Table of Contents
Section Page
1.0 INTRODUCTION AND SUMMARY ................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Purpose and Scope ................................................................................ 1-1
1.2 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR ................................ 1-3
1.3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts ...................................................... 1-4
1.4 Summary of Findings .............................................................................. 1-5
2.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................ 2-1
2.1 Location of Project .................................................................................. 2-1
2.2 Project Characteristics ............................................................................ 2-1
3.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ......................................................................... 3-1
3.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................... 3-3
3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources ....................................................... 3-7
3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................... 3-8
3.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................ 3-16
3.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................... 3-17
3.6 Geology and Soils ................................................................................. 3-19
3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................. 3-23
3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ........................................................ 3-30
3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................ 3-33
3.10 Land Use and Planning ......................................................................... 3-41
3.11 Mineral Resources ................................................................................ 3-49
3.12 Noise ..................................................................................................... 3-50
3.13 Population and Housing ........................................................................ 3-55
3.14 Public Services ..................................................................................... 3-57
3.15 Recreation ............................................................................................ 3-63
3.16 Transportation/Traffic ............................................................................ 3-66
3.17 Utilities and Service Systems ................................................................ 3-85
3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance ...................................................... 3-96
3.19 Cumulative Impacts .............................................................................. 3-96
4.0 ORGANIZATIONS AND PERSONS CONSULTED ........................................... 4-1
4.1 City of Anaheim (Lead Agency) .............................................................. 4-1
4.2 Project Applicant ..................................................................................... 4-1
4.3 Applicant’s Consultants ........................................................................... 4-1
4.4 Environmental Consultant ....................................................................... 4-2
5.0 LIST OF REFERENCES ................................................................................... 5-1
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
ii
Table of Contents (Continued)
Section Page
6.0 LIST OF APPENDICES (BOUNDED SEPARATELY IN VOLUME II)
A. PRELIMINARY GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION
B. PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT
C. PRELIMINARY HYDROLOGY REPORT
D. PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN
E. TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS UPDATE
F. PRELIMINARY ON-SITE SEWER SYSTEM STUDY
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
iii
List of Exhibits
Exhibit Page
2.1-1 REGIONAL LOCATION ..................................................................................... 2-2
2.1-2 VICINITY MAP ................................................................................................... 2-3
2.1-3 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH ................................................................................... 2-4
2.2-1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN ............................................................................. 2-11
2.2-2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP ............................................................................... 2-12
2.2-3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS ................................................................................ 2-13
2.2-4 LANDSCAPE PLAN ........................................................................................ 2-15
3.1-1 SITE PHOTOGRAPHS ...................................................................................... 3-5
3.9-1 EXISTING HYDROLOGY MAP ....................................................................... 3-35
3.9-2 PROPOSED HYDROLOGY MAP .................................................................... 3-37
3.16-1 OPENING YEAR (2016) PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES .............................. 3-77
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
iv
List of Tables
Table Page
2.2-1 COMPARISON OF PROPOSED PROJECT TO
PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT ........................................................................ 2-9
2.2-2 SUMMARY OF PROPOSED FLOOR PLANS ............................................... 2-10
2.2-3 PARKING SUMMARY ................................................................................... 2-14
3.6-1 SUMMARY OF MAJOR ACTIVE FAULTS .................................................... 3-21
3.13-1 ESTIMATED POPULATION, HOUSING AND EMPLOYMENT
GENERATION FOR THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE ....................................... 3-56
3.14-1 ACSD AND AUHSD STUDENT GENERATION RATES ............................... 3-60
3.16-1 PROJECT TRIP GENERATION COMPARISON ........................................... 3-68
3.16-2 EXISTING CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL OF SERVICE
SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 3-70
3.16-3 CUMULATIVE PROJECTS TRIP GENERATION .......................................... 3-71
3.16-4 OPENING YEAR (2016) CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL
OF SERVICE SUMMARY ............................................................................. 3-74
3.16-5 EXISTING PLUS PROJECT CONDITIONS INTERSECTION LEVEL
OF SERVICE SUMMARY ............................................................................. 3-76
3.16-6 CALTRANS METHODOLOGY LEVEL OF SERVICE SUMMARY ................. 3-79
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
1-1
11
1
Introduction and Summary
1.1 Purpose and Scope
This document, Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final
Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (State Clearinghouse No. 2004121045)
Prepared for the Platinum Gateway Project (hereinafter referred to as the “Addendum”) has
been prepared to demonstrate that there are no new significant environmental effects nor is there
a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects associated with
the proposed Platinum Gateway Project (Project No. DEV2012-00059) than those effects
identified by the previously-certified Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (State Clearinghouse No. 2004121045), to be referred to
as “FSEIR No. 339” throughout this document.
FSEIR No. 339 was prepared by the City as the environmental documentation for the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan, Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone, Platinum Triangle Standardized Development, and related zoning reclassifications to allow
the following maximum development intensities within the 820-acre Platinum Triangle:
General Plan Land Use Designation Permitted Density
Mixed Use 18,909 residential dwelling units
4,909,682 square feet of commercial development
9,862,166 square feet office development
1,500,000 square feet institutional development
Office High and Office Low 4,478,356 square feet
Institutional 3.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Industrial 0.5 FAR
Open Space 0.1 FAR
On October 26, 2010, City Council certified FSEIR No. 339, including Updated and Modified
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C for the PTMLUP. Implementation of the Revised
Platinum Triangle Project includes, but is not limited to implementation of the Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan (e.g., subdivision maps, grading permits, street improvement plans, final
site plans, development agreements, financial mechanisms including but not limited to
assessment districts, etc.).
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
1-2
The proposed Platinum Gateway Project, which is described in detail in Section 2.0 of this
Addendum, would allow for the development of a four-story “wrap-style” residential building
consisting of 399 dwelling units with a five-story parking structure and public park on a 7.01-
acre site within the Platinum Triangle.
When compared to the development intensity permitted by the General Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU
Overlay Zone, and Development Agreement No. 2007-00002, the Platinum Gateway Project
proposes 79 more residential units than permitted on the project site. In addition, the proposed
project would not develop 209,419 square feet of office development and 114,571 square feet of
commercial development, currently permitted for the project site. Therefore, amendments are
proposed to the General Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and Development Agreement
No. 2007-00002 to reflect the proposed development intensity of the Platinum Gateway Project.
The development intensity analyzed by FSEIR No. 339 for properties within the Platinum
Triangle designated for mixed use land use and the proposed development intensity within the
Platinum Triangle that includes the change in development intensity proposed by the Platinum
Gateway Project are as follows:
Mixed Use Land Use FSEIR No. 339 With Proposed Project Difference
Residential (Dwelling Units) 18,909 18,988 +79
Office (Square Feet) 9,862,166 9,652,747 -209,419
Commercial (Square Feet) 4,909,682 4,795,111 -114,571
Institutional (Square Feet) 1,500,000 1,500,000 0
The PTMU Overlay Zone requires the property owner to provide an on-site public park for all
residential development of more than 325 units on parcels eight acres or larger. The Platinum
Gateway Project includes an approximate 0.40-acre park; therefore, amendments to the General
Plan and the PTMLUP are proposed to reflect the location of the proposed public park within
these documents. Although the requirement for the public park was analyzed by FSEIR No. 339;
the proposed location was not specified in FSEIR No. 339.
With the exception of the minor increase in residential development intensity, decrease in office
and commercial development intensities and the location of the proposed public park, there are
no other changes to the project analyzed by FSEIR No. 339.
This Addendum together with all other environmental documents incorporated by reference
herein, serve as the environmental review of the proposed project, as required pursuant to the
provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA), Public Resources Code Section
21000 et. seq. the State CEQA Guidelines California Code of Regulations 15000 et. seq. and the
City of Anaheim procedures of the implementation of CEQA.
Pursuant to California Code of Regulations Section 15367 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the
City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency charged with the responsibility of determining whether the
proposed project will result in new information or new significant effects which were not
previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339, thus requiring a subsequent or supplemental EIR. As
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
1-3
part of the decision making process, the City is required to review and consider the potential
environmental effects that could result from implementation of the project. The City, as the
Lead Agency, has the authority for project approval and certification of the accompanying
environmental documentation.
1.2 Use of an Addendum to a Previously Certified EIR
Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be
prepared “if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Pursuant to Section
21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, no subsequent EIR may be
required for the project unless the City determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that one
or more of the following conditions are met:
15162:
(a) Where an EIR or Negative Declaration has been prepared, no subsequent EIR need be
prepared unless:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major
revisions of the previous EIR or Negative Declaration due to the involvement of
new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of
previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the
project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or
Negative Declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental
effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant
effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not
have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the
previous EIR was certified as complete or the Negative Declaration was adopted,
shows any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the
previous EIR or Negative Declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe
than shown in the previous EIR;
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible
would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more
significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to
adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
1-4
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from
those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or
more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents
decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative.
15163:
(a) The Lead or Responsible Agency may choose to prepare a supplement to an EIR rather
than a subsequent EIR if:
(1) Any of the conditions described in Section 15162 would require the preparation of
a subsequent EIR, and
(2) Only minor additions or changes would be necessary to make the previous EIR
adequately apply to the project in the changed situation.
15164:
(a) The Lead Agency or a Responsible Agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously
certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions
described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.
(b) An addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor
technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration
have occurred.
1.3 Evaluation of Environmental Impacts
Section 3.0 of this Addendum compares the anticipated environmental effects of the proposed
project with those disclosed in the previous EIR and reviews whether any of the conditions set
forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR
are met. Section 3.0 analyzes the potential environmental effects of the proposed project for
each of the following environmental topic areas:
Aesthetics
Agriculture and Forestry Resources
Air Quality
Biological Resources
Cultural Resources
Geology and Soils
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Hydrology and Water Quality
Land Use and Planning
Mineral Resources
Noise
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
1-5
Population and Housing
Public Services
Recreation
Transportation/Traffic
Utilities and Service Systems
Section 3.0 provides information and analysis upon which the City of Anaheim has based its
determination that no subsequent EIR is required for the proposed project.
1.4 Summary of Findings
Based on the environmental analysis prepared for the project (provided in Section 3.0), the
project would not result in any new significant impacts which were not previously addressed in
FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-1
2
Project Description
2.1 Location of Project
As shown on Exhibit 2.1-1, Regional Location, the project site is located within southern
Anaheim, in the north/central portion of Orange County, in Southern California. Regional access
is provided from the Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway and Orange (SR-57) Freeway. More specifically,
the project site consists of 7.01 acres located on the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and
South Lewis Street at 905, 915 and 917 East Katella Avenue within the Platinum Triangle in the
City of Anaheim, as shown on Exhibit 2.1-2, Vicinity Map. The project site includes four parcels
of land, APN No.’s 082-261-23, 082-269-02, 082-261-04, and 082-269-03. The project site is
generally bordered by commercial/industrial properties in all directions. It is bounded by Omni
Duct to the north, Mr. Stox Restaurant and an industrial building with multiple tenants including
Axxis Motorsports to the east, Test American Drilling Corporation, Brownco Construction,
Marmonite Masonry, and a former Unocal gas station to the south across East Katella Avenue,
and Trafalgar Travel Agency and the Orange County Register across South Lewis Street to the
west. An aerial photograph of the project site is shown on Exhibit 2.1-3.
2.2 Project Characteristics
2.2.1 PROJECT BACKGROUND
The City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency for this Addendum. Since 1996, the Anaheim City
Council has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle.
FEIR No. 320
On May 30, 1996, the Anaheim Planning Commission certified Final Environmental Impact
Report (FEIR) No. 320 (State Clearinghouse No. 95041029) and adopted Area Development
Plan No. 120 for the portion of the Stadium property associated with the Sportstown
Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or
renovated stadiums; 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses; a 500-room hotel
(550,000 square feet); a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center; 250,000 square feet of office
development; and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the renovated Angel
Stadium of Anaheim, and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were developed/renovated under
this plan.
Exhibit 2.1-1
REGIONAL LOCATION
0 2.5 mi 5.0 mi
Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA
TEMPLETON
PLANNING GROUP
Diamond Bar
Corona
Laguna
Beach
Newport
Beach
Pacific Ocean
Huntington
Beach
Long
Beach Garden Grove
Santa
Ana
Anaheim
Placentia
Fullerton
Brea
Yorba
Linda
Irvine
Los Angeles
Los Angeles Co.
Orange Co.Sa
n
B
e
r
n
a
r
d
i
n
o
C
o
.
Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
.Riv
e
r
s
i
d
e
C
o
.Or
a
n
g
e
C
o
.
60
60
15
9191
57
55
22
5
405
555
5
605
90
261
73
241
241133
133
PROJECTSITE
Exhibit 2.1-2
VICINITY MAP
Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA
TEMPLETON
PLANNING GROUP
The Platinum Triangle Boundary
Platinum Gateway Project Area
Source: FSEIR No. 339
Exhibit 2.1-3
AERIAL PHOTOGRAPH
Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA
TEMPLETON
PLANNING GROUP SOUTH LEWIS STREETEAST HOWELL AVENUE
AMTRAK
SOUTH CLAUDINE WAYPROJECTPROJECT
SITESITE
AUBURN WAYEAST GENE AUTRY WAYSOUTH BETMOR LNSAN
TA
ANA
F
R
E
EWA
Y
SO
U
T
H
AN
A
H
E
IM
W
A
Y
EAST KATELLA AVENUE
Project BoundarySource: Google Earth
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-5
Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan (MLUP) & FEIR No. 321
On March 2, 1999, the Anaheim City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land
Use Plan (MLUP). The boundaries for this MLUP were generally the same as those for the
Platinum Triangle, with the exception that this MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to I-5 that are
not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the
Anaheim Stadium Area MLUP, the City Council also certified FEIR No. 321 (State
Clearinghouse No. 9611041) and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106.
Development within the Anaheim Stadium Area was implemented through the Sports
Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone, which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the
provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports,
entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including
increased land use intensity. Implementation of this Overlay Zone was projected to result in a
net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new
office space; 452,026 square feet of new retail space; and 991,603 square feet of new hotel
space. Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the
Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology.
City of Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update & FEIR No. 330
On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan
and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General
Plan Update changed the General Plan designations within the project area from Commercial
Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low,
Industrial, Open Space, and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to
mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established
the overall maximum development intensity for the Platinum Triangle to be up to 9,175 dwelling
units; 5,000,000 square feet of office space; 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses; industrial
development at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50; and institutional development at a
maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda
Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 were
incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final EIR No. 330
(State Clearinghouse No. 2003041105), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning
Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development intensities on a citywide
impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including an Updated and Modified
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle.
Platinum Triangle MLUP (PTMLUP) & Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone
In order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the
Platinum Triangle, on August 17, 2004, the City Council replaced the Anaheim Stadium Area
MLUP with the Platinum Triangle MLUP (PTMLUP); replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the
Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone; approved the form of the Standardized
Platinum Triangle Development Agreement; and approved associated zoning reclassifications.
Under these updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU
Overlay Zone provisions are required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-6
the City of Anaheim. Ordinances associated with the PTMU Overlay Zone and the approved
zoning reclassifications became effective September 23, 2004.
FSEIR No. 332
On October 25, 2005, the Anaheim City Council adopted and certified the Final Subsequent EIR
(FSEIR) No. 332 (State Clearinghouse No. 2004121045) including an Updated and Modified
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106A for the PTMLUP and associated actions, which utilized
the certified FEIR No. 321 (adopted for the Anaheim Stadium MLUP, as discussed above) and
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. The General Plan Amendment associated with FSEIR
No. 332 increased the allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500
residential units; 5,000,000 square feet of office uses; and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial
uses.
The City Council approved two addendums to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to
increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units; 55,550 square feet of office
development; and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project EIR was also approved to
increase the allowable development intensity by an additional 699 residential units to bring the
total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to up to 10,266 residential
units; 5,055,550 square feet of office uses; and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses.
FSEIR No. 334
In order to increase the overall densities within the Platinum Triangle to accommodate market
demand and to further the project objectives, in 2007, the City embarked upon a process to adopt
a General Plan Amendment; amendments to the PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and the
Platinum Triangle Standardized Development; and related zoning reclassifications (hereafter, the
“Platinum Triangle project”). However, following the approval of the project and the associated
environmental impact report (FSEIR No. 334), a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of
FSEIR No. 334. In consideration of the City’s historical record in avoiding CEQA litigation and
its commitment to proper environmental review, the City Council repealed the approval of the
project and directed staff to prepare a new subsequent EIR for the “Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project.”
FSEIR No. 339
FSEIR No. 339 was prepared by the City as the environmental documentation for the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan, Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP), Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone, Platinum Triangle Standardized Development, and related zoning reclassifications to allow
the following maximum development intensities within the 820-acre Platinum Triangle:
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-7
General Plan Land Use Designation Permitted Density
Mixed Use 18,909 residential dwelling units
4,909,682 square feet of commercial development
9,862,166 square feet office development
1,500,000 square feet institutional development
Office High and Office Low 4,478,356
Institutional 3.0 Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
Industrial 0.5 FAR
Open Space 0.1 FAR
On October 26, 2010, City Council certified FSEIR No. 339, including Updated and Modified
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C for the PTMLUP. Implementation of the Revised
Platinum Triangle Project includes, but is not limited to implementation of the Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan (e.g., subdivision maps, grading permits, street improvement plans, final
site plans, development agreements, financial mechanisms including but not limited to
assessment districts, etc.).
Permitted Land Use and Development
Table LU-4: “General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City” of the Land Use
Element of the General Plan indicates the maximum development intensity for each of the land
use designations permitted within the Platinum Triangle. The Platinum Gateway Project Site is
designated for mixed use land use by the General Plan. The maximum permitted development
intensity for the Mixed Use Land Use Designation within the Platinum Triangle is up to:
18,909 residential dwelling units
4,909,682 square feet of commercial development
9,862,166 square feet office development
1,500,000 square feet institutional development
The PTMLUP and PTMU Overlay Zone further divide the portions of the Platinum Triangle
designated for Mixed Use Land Use by the General Plan into seven mixed-use districts. The
Platinum Gateway Project is located within the Katella District. This district allows for the
development of up to:
5,707 residential dwelling units
832,614 square feet of commercial development
2,131,058 square feet office development
Appendix G: PTMU Overlay Zone District Sub-Area Development Intensity Maps, of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, indicates the permitted amount of development for
certain areas within the Platinum Triangle. The Platinum Gateway Project is located within
Katella District Sub-Area A, which permits development of the project site with up to:
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-8
320 dwelling units
114,571 square feet of commercial development
209,419 square feet of office development
An approved final site plan and a development agreement between the property owner and the
City of Anaheim are required for all development under the PTMU Overlay Zone. The final site
plan application is submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director as to
conformance with the provisions of the PTMU Overlay Zone and the Platinum Triangle Master
Land Use Plan. The approved Final Site Plan is then attached as an exhibit to the Development
Agreement and submitted to the Planning Commission and the City Council for review at a
noticed public hearing.
In 2008, Development Agreement No. 2007-00002 was executed to govern the development of a
mixed use project on the Platinum Gateway Project Site. The approved project consists of a 320-
unit condominium complex, a 12-story, 209,419 square foot office building, including a 5,586
square foot full-service restaurant, 4,381 square feet of retail space, and a 138-room hotel.
2.2.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS
The Platinum Gateway Project requires the following discretionary approvals by the City of
Anaheim:
1) An amendment to the City of Anaheim General Plan to (a) amend Table LU-4: “General Plan
Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City” to increase the number of dwelling units
and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the Mixed Use
land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and (b) amend the Land Use, Circulation and
Green Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park for this project
site.
2) An amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to reflect (a) an
increase in the total number of dwelling units; (b) a reduction in the commercial square
footage; (c) a reduction in office square footage; and, (d) an addition of a public park.
3) An amendment to Chapter 18.20.040 of the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code to revise Table
20-D Development Intensities: (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone to
reflect (a) an increase in the permitted number of dwelling units; (b) reduce the permitted
amount of commercial square footage; and, (c) reduce the permitted amount of office square
footage.
4) Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2007-00002 between the City of
Anaheim and Ronald W. Marshall Trust, Deborah L. Marshall Trust, Marshall Family Trust,
Charles B. Marshall Trust, and Susan M. Marshall Trust to address the project redesign,
including a revised product type and site layout.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-9
5) A tentative tract map to reflect the redesign of the Platinum Gateway Project and the adjacent
Platinum Vista Project (Project No. DEV2012-00060) and the addition of the proposed
public park.
Approval of the Platinum Gateway Project would allow the development of a four-story “wrap-
style” residential building consisting of 399 dwelling units with a five-story parking structure
and a public park on a 7.01-acre site. The proposed density for the site is 57 residential units per
acre. No office or commercial uses are proposed. The Conceptual Site Plan is shown on Exhibit
2.2-1. The Tentative Tract Map is shown on Exhibit 2.2-2.
As shown on Table 2.2-1, when compared to the development intensity permitted by the General
Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and Development Agreement No. 2007-00002, the
Proposed Project would result in an increase of 79 residential units and a reduction of allowable
office and commercial development by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet,
respectively.
Table 2.2-1
Comparison of Proposed Project to Permitted Development
Land Use Permitted Development Proposed Project Difference
Residential (Dwelling Units) 320 399 +79
Office (Square Feet) 209,419 0 -209,419
Commercial (Square Feet) 114,571 0 -114,571
The PTMU Overlay Zone requires the property owner to provide an on-site public park for all
residential development of more than 325 units on parcels eight acres or larger. The Platinum
Gateway Project includes an approximate 0.40-acre park; therefore, amendments to the General
Plan and the PTMLUP are proposed to reflect the location of the proposed public park within
these documents.
The Platinum Gateway Project includes a total of 8 studio units, 191 one-bedroom units, 152
two-bedroom units, 39 three-bedroom units, and 9 three-bedroom plus loft units. The elevations
from East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street on Exhibit 2.3-3, Building Elevations show
details on the architectural design proposed. A summary of the proposed floor plans is provided
in Table 2.2-2.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-10
Table 2.2-2
Summary of Proposed Floor Plans
Plan Type Type # of Units
Average
Square
Footage
% of Mix Total Square
Footage
Plan S1 Studio 8 561 2.0% 4,488
Plan A1 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 32 683 8.0% 21,856
Plan A1-A 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 14 706 3.5% 9,884
Plan A2 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 16 708 4.0% 11,328
Plan A4 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 93 803 23.3% 74,679
Plan A5 1 Bedroom / 1 Bath 36 829 9.0% 29,844
Plan B1 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 51 1,040 12.8% 53,040
Plan B2 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 18 1,050 4.5% 18,900
Plan B3 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 43 1,163 10.8% 50,009
Plan B6 2 Bedroom / 2 Bath 40 1,208 10.0% 48,320
Plan C1 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 11 1,310 2.8% 14,410
Plan C2 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 28 1,400 7.0% 39,200
Plan C1-L 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 3 1,460 0.8% 4,380
Plan C2-L 3 Bedroom / 2 Bath 6 1,550 1.5% 9,300
TOTAL 399 100% 389,638
Source: Architects Orange, July 2012.
Exhibit 2.2-1 CONCEPTUAL SITE PLAN0 40’80’Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CATEMPLETONPLANNING GROUPLEGENDSource: Architects Orange
Exhibit 2.2-2 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 174940 50’100’Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CATEMPLETONPLANNING GROUPSource: Hall & Foreman, Inc.PLATINUM VISTA(NOT A PART)
Exhibit 2.2-3 BUILDING ELEVATIONS0 18’36’Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CATEMPLETONPLANNING GROUPSource: Architects OrangeElevation 1: View looking north from E. Katella Avenue.Elevation 2: View looking east from S. Lewis Street.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
2-14
Additionally, the PTMU Overlay Zone requires 731 parking spaces for the Platinum Gateway
Project. A total of 741 parking spaces are proposed, including 21 street spaces, 6 surface spaces,
and 714 spaces within the parking structure, as shown in the parking summary in Table 2.2-3.
Table 2.2-3
Parking Summary Unit Type Number of Units Stalls/Unit Required Parking
Studio 8 1.25 10
1 Bedroom 191 1.50 287
2 Bedroom 152 2.00 304
3 Bedroom 39 2.50 98
3 Bedroom + Loft 9 3.50 32
Total Parking Required 399 N/A 731
Street Parking 21
Surface Parking 6
Parking Structure 714
Total Parking Proposed 741
Source: Architects Orange, July 2012.
The landscape plan, shown in Exhibit 2.2-4, provides detail to the location and type of trees to be
planted within the project site. Palm trees along East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street
will include Phoenix dactylifera (Date Palm), and Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm).
Street trees along East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street will include Tristania conferta
(Brisbane Box), Prunus species (Plum), Lagerstroemia indica (Crape Myrtle), and Cercidium
species (Palo Verde). The Connector Street trees will include Podocarpus gracilior (Fern Pine),
Washingtonia robusta (Mexican Fan Palm), Liriodendron tulipifera (Tulip Tree), Tristania
conferta (Brisbane Box), Magnolia g. ‘St. Mary’ (Magnolia), Prunus species (Plum),
Lagerstroemia indica (Crape Myrtle), and Cercidium species (Palo Verde).
With the exception of the proposed increase of 79 residential units, reduction of office and
commercial development by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet, respectively, and
specifying the location of the proposed public park, there are no other differences between the
Platinum Gateway Project and the development analyzed by FSEIR No. 339.
Exhibit 2.2-4 LANDSCAPE PLAN0 35’70’Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CATEMPLETONPLANNING GROUPSource: TheCollaborativeWest
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-1
3
Environmental Analysis
This portion of the Addendum examines each environmental topic analyzed in FSEIR No. 339 in
relation to the Platinum Gateway Project. By definition, an addendum to a CEQA document is
intended to demonstrate that the modifications to the previously approved project will not
substantially increase the environmental impacts or create new significant impacts. With the
exception of the proposed increase of 79 residential units, reduction of office and commercial
development by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet, respectively, and specifying the
location of the proposed public park, there are no other modifications to the project analyzed by
FSEIR No. 339.
Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines states that an Addendum to an EIR shall be
prepared “if some changes or additions are necessary, but none of the conditions described in
Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred.” Pursuant to Section
21166 of CEQA and Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, for each environmental topic
the following analysis includes a summary of the analysis in FSEIR No. 339, followed by a
comparison to the anticipated effects of the Platinum Gateway Project and a determination as to
whether a subsequent EIR is required for the project, based upon substantial evidence, that one
or more of the following conditions are met:
(1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the
previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects;
(2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is
undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the
involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the
severity of previously identified significant effects; or
(3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have
been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was
certified as complete show any of the following:
(A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous
EIR or Negative Declaration;
(B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than
shown in the previous EIR;
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-2
(C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in
fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of
the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or
alternative; or
(D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those
analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant
effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the
mitigation measure or alternative.
The analysis includes existing regulations and standard conditions that will apply to the Platinum
Gateway Project, as well as applicable mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program
No. 106C, adopted in conjunction with the certification of FSEIR No. 339. These mitigation
measures have been compiled into Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307. In certain
circumstances the measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C have been modified
to reflect the Platinum Gateway Project. Deletions are shown in strikethrough and additions are
shown in bold. Compliance with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 307 will be a condition of
approval for the Platinum Gateway Project.
Based on the following substantial evidence, the Platinum Gateway Project would not result in
any new significant impacts which were not previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-3
3.1 Aesthetics
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is highly
urbanized with industrial, commercial, and recreational uses, which do not exhibit any
significant geographic features or natural resources of importance. Although the development of
the Platinum Triangle would result in an intensification of the existing urban character of the
area through demolition or renovation of existing structures and construction of new structures,
after mitigation, the impacts to aesthetic resources were not found to be significant. FSEIR No.
339 also did not identify any designated scenic resources or scenic highways within the project
area. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project site is not characterized by unique
visual resources, and no historic structures exist on the property. Therefore, no adverse impacts
on designated scenic resources would result from the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project.
A transition from light industrial to mixed-use development within the Platinum Triangle is
occurring through the development of residential, commercial, and office uses. Landmarks
include man-made elements such as Angel Stadium of Anaheim and the Honda Center. Because
of the predominately urban character of the Platinum Triangle, night-lighting is widespread and
characterized by parking lot lighting; structural lighting for hotels and restaurants; overhead
street lighting; vehicle headlights; sign/building illumination; and lighting during nighttime
sporting events. Additionally, at the time of FSEIR No. 339 preparation, Angel Stadium of
Anaheim, the Honda Center, and several high-rise office and residential uses created shade and
shadows throughout the project area. FSEIR No. 339 identified that increased density and height
would result in increased shadow lengths and widths beyond the existing conditions at that time.
The issue of shade and shadow pertains to the blockage of direct sunlight by on-site buildings,
which affect adjacent properties. Shading is an important environmental issue because the users
or occupants of certain land uses, such as residential, recreational, outdoor restaurants, and
pedestrian areas have expectations for direct sunlight and warmth from the sun. According to
FSEIR No. 339, compliance with design standards would reduce shade/shadow impacts by
breaking up continuous shade lines. However, despite these design guidelines, there is a
potential that over 50 percent of on- and off-site shadow-sensitive areas would experience
shade/shadow effects for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. Future development
projects, where adjacent uses are deemed shadow sensitive, would be required to demonstrate
that their projects would not interfere with those uses’ exposure to natural sunlight, and
incorporate design features that allow direct sunlight for at least 50 percent of the sun-sensitive
areas for at least 50 percent of duration for the season, as appropriate.
In order to visually unify the area, new mixed-use development within the Platinum Triangle
would be required to adhere to the design standards and principles for the PTMU Overlay Zone.
FSEIR No. 339 found that potential impacts related to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-4
Project could result in significant visual impacts that could be reduced to less than significant
levels through mitigation.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
Visual Appearance
The current visual character of this portion of the Platinum Triangle is characterized by low- and
mid-rise commercial buildings, light industrial uses, and residential apartment/condominum
complexes with varying architectural styles. Coverage of the project site is nearly complete with
the existing tilt-up light industrial structure, associated paved parking and limited landscaping.
The structure on the project site will be demolished as part of the proposed project. Photographs
of the project site are shown on Exhibit 3.1-1.
The proposed four-story residential development with a five-story parking garage and associated
landscaping is consistent with the visual character of the existing surrounding land uses. For
instance, the existing four-story Vivere condominium complex is located east of the project site
at 1331 East Katella Avenue, and the existing five-story Park Viridian apartment homes complex
is located to the east of Vivere at 1515 East Katella Avenue. Continuing east on Katella Avenue
are several existing residential complexes similar to the Platinum Gateway Project. An
amendment to the development agreement for the adjacent property to the east, Platinum Vista,
located at 1005 – 1105 East Katella Avenue is currently being processed for the development of
350 residential dwelling units. Because of the in-fill nature of the proposed project and the
compatible nature of the proposed project among similar scale buildings within this urban
pattern, there are no significant visual impacts resulting from the construction of the proposed
project.
Shade and Shadow
The residential buildings would be a maximum of 57 feet in height, and the garage would be a
maximum of 62 feet and 5 inches in height, which does not exceed the maximum 100-foot height
limit. The Platinum Gateway Project consists of 399 residential units, six landscaped courtyards,
a club house, fitness center, and public park. The project’s design, building massing, and
impacts are in conformity with those analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. FSEIR No. 339 also
anticipated the effects of light and shadow on the surrounding environment, adding mitigation
requiring applicants to demonstrate that their projects would not interfere with sensitive uses’
exposure to natural sunlight, and incorporate design features that allow direct sunlight for at least
50 percent of the sun sensitive areas for at least 50 percent of duration for the season, as
appropriate. However, this measure does not apply to the Platinum Gateway Project because
there are no adjacent shadow sensitive uses and; therefore, no significant impacts will occur.
Light and Glare
The security lighting for the proposed residential development and public park will create a new
source of light and glare. However, the project would comply with the applicable provisions of
Exhibit 3.1-1
SITE PHOTOGRAPHS
Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA
TEMPLETON
PLANNING GROUP
Photograph 1: View looking northeast from the northwest corner of S. Lewis Street and E. Katella Avenue.
Photograph 2: View looking northeast from the southeast corner of S. Lewis Street and E. Katella Avenue.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-6
The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and PTMU Overlay Zone with regards to
landscaping, lighting, and setback requirements. It is also anticipated that proper installments of
light fixtures that include the necessary shielding, such as hoods, filtering louvers, and glare
shields may be required to maintain proper lighting in the park facility without undue glare
impacts on adjoining residential areas. Therefore, less than significant impacts associated with
additional light and glare would result from project implementation. No mitigation measures are
necessary.
FSEIR No. 339 concluded that, with the implementation of the PTMLUP and the PTMU Overlay
Zone, no unavoidable significant impacts related to aesthetics would occur. The proposed
project includes the quality of design in accordance with City of Anaheim requirements and
those analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. Therefore, the proposed project does not require any changes
to FSEIR No. 339 related to aesthetics.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant aesthetic effects identified in and considered by FSEIR No.
339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
Future development projects within the Platinum Triangle shall be required to comply with the
planning principles and the urban design elements contained in the Platinum Triangle MLUP as
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-7
amended, and the development standards contained in the PTMU Overlay Zone (Chapter 18.20
of the Anaheim Municipal Code) as amended.
3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to agriculture resources were identified through
the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis
related to agricultural resources. FSEIR No. 339 did not provide specific analysis of forest
resources.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects,
lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment
Model prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in
assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest
resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to
information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the
state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the
Forest Legacy Assessment Project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in
Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. The Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency designates the project site as Urban and
Built-Up Land.1 In addition, the project site is not currently used for agricultural production or
under any Williamson Act contracts, and no such designated land is nearby. Therefore, no
impacts to agricultural resources are anticipated.
The project site is not defined as forest land according to Section 12220(g) of the California
Public Resources Code, which defines forest land as “land that can support 10 percent native tree
cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for
management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife,
biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits,” nor is it zoned for Timberland
Production as defined by Section 51104(g) of the California Government Code. The project site
is currently developed with urban uses including an industrial building occupied by multiple
tenants including Golden West Medical Center and associated paved parking. The project site
does not contain any forest land and forest land would not be converted to non-forest use.
Therefore, no impacts related to forestry resources are anticipated. Although the CEQA
questions related to forestry resources were not on the checklist when the FSEIR No. 339 was
prepared, there are no environmental impacts associated with this issue; therefore, this does not
preclude the use of an addendum to the previous document.
1 Farmland Mapping & Monitoring Program Website:
ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2010/ora10.pdf
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-8
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant agriculture and forestry resources impacts identified in and
considered by FSEIR No. 339.
3.3 Air Quality
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
FSEIR No. 339 analyzed air pollutant emissions associated with the Platinum Triangle area for
build-out of the PTMLUP. Air pollutant emissions associated with new development occurring
in the Platinum Triangle area would increase carbon monoxide (CO) emissions, volatile organic
compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), sulfur oxides (SOx), respirable particulate matter less
than 10 micrometers in diameter (PM10), and respirable particulate matter less than 2.5
micrometers in diameter (PM2.5) within the project vicinity.
Short-Term Air Quality Impacts Associated with Construction
Air pollutant emissions from construction activities were modeled using URBEMIS2007, and
were included in Table 5.2-6 of FSEIR No. 339. The primary source of construction-related CO,
SOx, VOC, and NOx emissions is gasoline- and diesel-powered, heavy-duty mobile construction
equipment, such as scrapers and motor graders. The primary sources of PM10 and PM2.5
emissions is clearing and demolition activities, excavation and grading operations, construction
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-9
vehicle traffic on unpaved ground, and wind blowing over exposed earth surfaces. Air pollutant
emissions generated from construction activities would cause temporary increases in air pollutant
emissions that exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) threshold
criteria for CO, NOx, VOC, PM10, and PM2.5. Therefore, FSEIR No. 339 concluded that the
Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project’s construction impact was a Significant
Unavoidable Adverse Impact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the
City Council.
Long-Term Air Quality Impacts Associated with Operation
Operation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate air pollutants
from stationary sources and mobile sources. The stationary source emissions from operation of
the proposed land uses would come from its consumption of natural gas and electricity. FSEIR
No. 339 indicated that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project at buildout would
generate 443,263 average daily trips. Using the default emission factors included in
URBEMIS2007, emissions associated with the project were calculated and included in Table
5.2-7 of FSEIR No. 339. As shown in this table, project-related emissions would exceed the
SCAQMD daily emissions thresholds for CO, VOC, NOx, PM10 and PM2.5. Mobile sources
represent the largest source of operational emissions for the project. Therefore, FSEIR No. 339
concluded that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project’s impact was considered a
Significant Unavoidable Adverse Impact, and a Statement of Overriding Considerations was
adopted by the City Council.
CO Hotspot Analysis
Localized concentrations of air pollutant emissions associated with the new development
occurring within the Platinum Triangle area would increase pollutant concentrations that could
contribute to violations of federal and state ambient air quality standards (AAQS). Localized
concentrations of pollutant emissions from operation of the Platinum Triangle were modeled
using CALINE4, for their potential to contribute to CO hotspots and were included in Table 5.2-
8 of FSEIR No. 339. As shown in this table, localized concentrations of CO at congested
intersections would not exceed the most stringent AAQS.
Consistency with the AQMP
FSEIR No. 339 included a consistency evaluation with the SCAQMD’s Air Quality Management
Plan (AQMP). The consistency evaluation concluded that because the Master Land Use Plan
would reduce vehicle miles traveled (VMT) within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), the
project is consistent with the AQMP.
Odors
FSEIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle area found that no significant impact from
objectionable odors from construction or operation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project would occur.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-10
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
Short-Term Air Quality Impacts Associated with Construction
Construction activities of the proposed project would have a short-term impact on air quality.
Temporary construction emissions would result from demolition of the existing structure,
pavement, and utilities, excavation, and grading activities, and from construction of the proposed
project. No additional building demolition would be required to construct the additional 79
dwelling units. The proposed project would result in the construction of 79 additional dwelling
units, air pollutant emissions of which were not previously analyzed in the FSEIR No. 339 for
the Platinum Triangle. However, the proposed project would reduce the maximum development
intensity for build-out of the PTMLUP by 209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet
of commercial uses. Therefore, construction of the less intense project would decrease the
duration of construction activities associated with the Platinum Gateway Project. As a result, the
project would not increase the maximum daily air pollutant emissions generated during
construction activities. The project would contribute to emissions of CO, NOx, VOC, PM10, and
PM2.5 that exceed the SCAQMD’s construction emission thresholds identified in FSEIR No. 339
and therefore cumulatively contribute to the SoCAB’s ozone nonattainment designation,
however, cumulative impacts would be less than those calculated under the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project. The construction air emissions are anticipated to be less than those
calculated in FSEIR No. 339 and would not result in any new significant impacts which were not
previously anticipated.
Operational Impacts
The primary source of regional emissions generated by the proposed project would be from
motor vehicles. Other emissions would be generated from the combustion of natural gas for
space heating and the generation of electricity. Emissions would also be generated by the use of
natural gas and oil for the generation of electricity off-site. As discussed in Section 3.16,
Transportation/Traffic, long term operational impacts associated with vehicle trips generated
from the proposed project would be 72 percent less than the trips associated with the land uses
for the site analyzed by FSEIR No. 339. The project would result in a reduction of 6,433 daily
trips and 45,481 vehicle miles traveled (VMT) as compared to the previously approved uses,
since residential uses generate less trips than office and commercial uses. Since the primary
source of operational emissions are the result of vehicle emissions, the reduction in daily
volumes would result in a reduction in operational related air emissions. The operational air
emissions from the additional 79 units would not result in any new significant impacts that were
not previously anticipated. No new significant impacts would occur.
CO Hotspot Analysis
Localized air quality effects would occur when emissions from vehicular traffic increase CO
concentrations at congested intersections. As previously stated, the proposed Platinum Gateway
Project would generate 6,433 less daily trips. Therefore, the additional 79 residential units
proposed within the Platinum Gateway Project and reduction of 209,419 square feet of office
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-11
space and 114,571 square feet of commercial use would result in a decrease in the number of
project-related vehicles at local intersections within the vicinity of the project. Further, the
proportion of project-related vehicle trips is small in relation to the volume of traffic at local
intersections. The project would not expose sensitive-receptors to substantial pollutant
concentrations and no new air quality impacts would occur.
Consistency with the AQMP
SCAQMD’s most recent adopted comprehensive plan is the 2007 AQMP, which was adopted
June 1, 2007. However, SCAQMD has recently released a draft of the 2012 Air Quality
Management Plan (Draft 2012 AQMP), which is anticipated to be adopted in the fall of 2012.
Regional growth projections are used by SCAQMD to forecast future emission levels in the
SoCAB. For southern California, these regional growth projections are provided by the Southern
California Association of Governments (SCAG) and are partially based on land use designations
included in city/county general plans. Typically, only large, regionally significant projects have
the potential to affect the regional growth projections. While the proposed project would result
in an increase in population, it would also reduce employment in the City of Anaheim, and it
would not substantially affect the regional growth projections. The project would reduce
emissions and would not affect the regional emissions inventory or conflict with strategies in the
AQMP to attain the AAQS. Because the project would increase the number of residential units
by 79 units, the project would further reduce the VMT within the SoCAB and the project would
be consistent with the AQMP. The proposed project would not conflict or obstruct
implementation of the AQMP.
Odors
During construction, potential odors would be generated by trucks and heavy-duty construction
equipment used on site during demolition and construction. However, odors from the trucks and
heavy-duty construction equipment used at the project site would be temporary and would cease
to exist after construction is completed. Additionally, construction of the proposed project
would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Therefore, no
new significant impact would occur.
Conclusion
The proposed project will reduce project intensity from that allowed in FSEIR No. 339 through
the reduction of office and commercial uses. The Platinum Gateway Project will also produce
72% less trips than would be generated by the existing entitlements. Thus, because the project is
building out at less than anticipated in FSEIR No. 339, short-term air quality impacts related to
construction and long-term operational air emissions from vehicular traffic will be less than the
air emissions projected in FSEIR No. 339. Additionally, implementation of FSEIR No. 339
Mitigation Measures Nos. 2-1 through 2-6, which address emissions from grading, construction
equipment operation and stationary sources will further reduce air quality impacts to less than
significant. As a result, the Platinum Gateway Project does not require any changes to FSEIR
No. 339 related to air quality.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-12
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant air quality impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR
No. 339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
SCAQMD Rule 201: Permit to Construct.
SCAQMD Rule 402: Nuisance Odors.
SCAQMD Rule 403: Fugitive Dust.
SCAQMD Rule 1403: Asbestos Emissions from Demolition/Renovation Activities.
CARB Rule 2480: Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) – Schools.
CARB Rule 2485: Airborne Toxics Control Measure (ATCM) – Commercial Vehicles.
Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24).
Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20).
Motor Vehicle Standards (AB 1493).
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-13
2007 AQMP.
Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339
The following mitigation measures are taken from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation measures
apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project.
2-1 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall be
responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to reduce
construction-related emissions; however, the resultant value is expected to remain
significant.
a) The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly
serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations
to reduce operational emissions.
b) The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as identified by the United States
Environmental Protection Agency, off-road construction equipment with higher
air pollutant emissions standards for equipment greater than 50 horsepower, based
on manufacturer’s availability.
c) The contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel
generators rather than temporary diesel-power generators, where feasible.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-30, Mitigation Measure No. 2-1)
2-2 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall implement
the following measures in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control
under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 to further reduce PM10 and
PM2.5 emissions. To assure compliance, the City shall verify compliance that these
measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections. The
measures to be implemented are listed below:
a) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding
and watering as quickly as possible to achieve a minimum control efficiency for
PM10 of 5 percent.
b) During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall apply chemical soil stabilizers to on-site haul roads to achieve a
control efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared to travel on unpaved,
untreated roads.
c) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall phase grading to
prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time.
d) The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall schedule activities
to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of
work periods.
e) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall sweep streets with Rule 1186 compliant PM10 efficient vacuum
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-14
units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or
occurs as a result of hauling.
f) During active demolition and debris removal and grading, the property
owner/developer’s construction contractor shall suspend demolition and grading
operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to achieve an emissions
control efficiency for PM10 under worst-case wind conditions of 98 percent.
g) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-inch freeboard on trucks hauling dirt,
sand, soil, or other loose materials and tarp materials with a fabric cover or other
suitable means to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent.
h) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of
every three hours on the construction site to achieve an emissions reduction
control efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent.
i) During active demolition and debris removal, the property owner/developer’s
construction contractor shall apply water to disturbed soils at the end of each day
to achieve an emission control efficiency for PM10 of 10 percent.
j) During scraper unloading and loading, the property owner/developer’s construc-
tion contractor shall ensure that actively disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil
moisture content of 12 percent by use of a moveable sprinkler system or water
truck to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 69 percent.
k) During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction
contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than 15
miles per hour to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 57 percent.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-30, Mitigation Measure No. 2-2)
2-3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit
Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D)
recycling and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials.
These plans shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the
project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling
of materials on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a
project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts
made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer
recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private
firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at
the project site. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-32, Mitigation Measure No. 2-3)
2-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit
evidence that high-solids or water-based low emissions paints and coatings are utilized in
the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with South Coast Air Quality
Management District’s regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-15
plans and specifications. Additionally, the property owner/developer’s shall specify the
use of high-volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand application. Air-atomized
spray techniques shall not be permitted. Plans shall also show that property
owner/developers shall construct/build with materials that do not require painting, or use
prepainted construction materials, to the extent feasible. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-32,
Mitigation Measure No. 2-4)
2-5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no
later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property
owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational
CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10 emissions:
Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Platinum Gateway
Traffic Impact Analysis Update, LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012
Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parsons
Brinckerhoff, August 20+10 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall
be implemented as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.
The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as required
by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site frontage
routes as needed.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-5)
2-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/architect shall submit energy
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the
California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that shows each new
structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum
of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce
roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the
energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building
materials and suppliers can be found at the following website:
http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways not
within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool
pavement materials are available at: http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances (e.g.,
EnergyStar® appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or double-
paned windows.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-16
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing
over 50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the building structure
to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and
office buildings.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-6)
3.4 Biological Resources
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to biological resources were identified through
the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis
related to biological resources. The project area is developed with urban uses and is nearly built-
out with no natural resources on-site. Based on the City of Anaheim General Plan Green
Element, no locally designated species or natural communities, wetland habitats, or wildlife
corridors are known to exist within the Platinum Triangle. The project area is not part of the
Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP) and did not impact any resources within the
NCCP area.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
The project site is located in an existing commercial and industrial area and is currently
developed with urban uses including a tilt-up light industrial building, associated paved parking
and limited landscaping. The site is graded, flat and landscaping consists of non-native
ornamental vegetation. The project site does not contain any of the following:
Habitat that would support sensitive species;
Riparian habitat;
Sensitive natural communities identified in local or regional plans, policies, or
regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife;
Known wetlands;
Native resident or migratory fish, wildlife species, or wildlife corridors;
Protected biological resources; or
Native plant communities or wildlife habitat.
Therefore, implementation of the project will not cause any significant impacts related to
biological resources, and no mitigation measures will be required. Therefore, no new impacts
are anticipated which were not previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-17
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant biological resources impacts identified in and considered
by FSEIR No. 339.
3.5 Cultural Resources
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to cultural resources were identified through the
initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis
related to cultural resources. Based on the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element, the
Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is not located within the Anaheim Colony
Historic District. As such, none of the structures in the project area are identified on the
Qualified Historic Structures List of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan
(July 20, 1999) and no impacts would result from project implementation. There were no known
archaeological or paleontological resources, unique geologic features, or human remains at the
project site, and no significant impacts to such resources were anticipated according to FSEIR
No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-18
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
According to FSEIR No. 339, no cultural resources are known to exist on the proposed Platinum
Gateway Project site. However, the project includes a General Plan Amendment, so the City of
Anaheim initiated formal tribal consultation under the requirements of Senate Bill 18 and sent
letters to all applicable Native American tribes as determined by the Native American Heritage
Commission (NAHC). Chairman Andrew Teutimez Salas of the Gabrieleno Band of Mission
Indians/Kizh Tribe Los Angeles Basin responded via email on August 8, 2012. He states that the
proposed project is located within some of their Native Prehistoric KIZH/Gabrieleno Villages,
and the tribe requests that one of their Native American Monitors be present only during any and
all ground disturbance in an effort to protect and preserve all of their cultural resources in the
event that a cultural resource(s) is found. The owner/developer will comply with the Chairman’s
request for their Native American Monitor to be present during any and all ground disturbances.
The 90-day invitation to consult period ended with no other entities requesting to meet. The City
has completed its obligations under Senate Bill 18 for the Platinum Gateway Project.
In addition, the project site was previously graded and is currently developed with urban uses
including a tilt-up light industrial building, associated paved parking and limited landscaping.
The existing structure on the site was built in the 1970’s. The existing structure is not over 50
years old and is not considered historically significant. Therefore, no significant impacts to
cultural resources are anticipated and no mitigation measures will be required.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-19
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant cultural resources impacts identified in and considered by
FSEIR No. 339.
3.6 Geology and Soils
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, impacts related to geology and soils were identified as less than
significant through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any
specific analysis related to geology and soils.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
The following section is summarized from information provided in the Preliminary Geotechnical
Evaluation for the project site prepared by EEI on July 3, 2012. The Preliminary Geotechnical
Evaluation is provided in Appendix A of this Initial Study/Addendum.
Topography
The project site is approximately 145 feet above mean sea level (MSL) and is relatively flat. The
site is located in the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7½-minute Anaheim quadrangle, which
shows that the topography of the surrounding area is also relatively flat. Regional topography
gently slopes toward the west and south.
Geology
Regional Geologic Setting
The project site is situated within the Peninsular Ranges Geomorphic Province in Southern
California. The Peninsular Ranges consist of a series of mountain ranges separated by
longitudinal valleys. The ranges trend northwest-southeast and are sub-parallel to faults
branching from the San Andreas Fault. The Peninsular Ranges are bounded by the Transverse
Ranges province to the north, the Colorado Desert Province to the east and Mexico to the south.
The nearest mountains are the northwest-trending Santa Ana Mountains, located approximately
eight miles east of the project site.
Local Geologic Setting
The project site is underlain by Pleistocene-aged to Holocene-aged alluvial fan deposits. These
deposits are locally mantled by artificial fill materials of varying thicknesses.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-20
Alluvium
Subsurface conditions consist of Quaternary-age alluvial fan deposits (alluvium) that extends to
the maximum explored depth of 51.5 feet below the existing ground surface. The alluvial fan
deposits consist of interbedded poorly graded sands and silty sands, with lesser zones of sandy
silts and clayey silts. The sandy layers of the alluvium are typically dry to moist and loose to
medium dense, while the sandy silt and clayey silt layers are generally moist to very moist and
firm to stiff. Laboratory Expansion Index tests indicate that the alluvium has a very low
expansion potential. Laboratory tests also indicate that the alluvium is moderately alkaline (pH
= 8.2) and is highly corrosive to ferrous metals. Laboratory testing yielded a soluble sulfate
concentration of 0.003 percent, indicating a negligible corrosion potential to concrete. Chloride
concentration within the tested sample was 0.002 percent, indicating that the alluvium possesses
a low potential for corrosion of steel reinforcement in concrete. A conventional shallow
foundation system appears to be suitable for use to support the residential structure proposed for
development, and a reinforced mat foundation system for the support of the proposed parking
structure, provided the property is graded and improved in general conformance with
recommendations presented in the Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation prepared by EEI, as well
as the California Building Code, the City of Anaheim and/or County of Orange grading
ordinances.
Groundwater Conditions
Groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory borings to the maximum depths
explored of 51.5 feet below existing grades during the subsurface exploration. The historic high
groundwater in the vicinity of the site is at least 50 feet below the ground surface. A few
groundwater monitoring wells are located within the general vicinity of the project site based on
historical well data provided by the California Department of Water Resources (CDWR). The
nearest well, No. 04S10W26C001S is located approximately 0.23 miles west of the site and
depth to groundwater was approximately 124 feet below ground surface (bgs) in 1973. Well No.
04S10W23R001S, located approximately 0.34 miles northeast of the project site reported a depth
to groundwater at 89.8 feet bgs in 1969, and Well No. 04S10W25D001S located approximately
0.50 miles east of the project site reported a depth to groundwater at 113 feet bgs in 2010. In
addition, the former Unocal Station located 100 feet south of the project site at 1818 South Lewis
Street reported depth to groundwater at approximately 80 to 100 feet bgs. Based on the surface
topography, regional groundwater flow can be expected to migrate to the west/southwest.
Geologic Hazards
Seismic Ground Shaking
The portion of Southern California that includes the project site is considered to be seismically
active. The nearest active faults that could affect the subject site include the San Joaquin Hills
Fault, located approximately 8 miles from the site, the Puente Hills Blind Thrust, located
approximately 9 miles from the site, the Whittier Fault, located approximately 9 miles from the
site, and the Los Angeles Basin segment of the Newport Inglewood Fault Zone, located
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-21
approximately 10 miles from the site. Other nearby seismic sources includes the Chino-Central
Avenue segment of the Elsinore Fault Zone and the offshore segment of the Newport Inglewood
Fault Zone. Due to the proximity of the site area to several nearby active faults, strong ground
shaking could occur at the site as a result of an earthquake on any one of these faults. The
following Table 3.6-1 provides a summary of active fault zones within an approximately 25-mile
radius of the project site that may have a considerable effect on the project site in the event
significant activity is experienced. There are no known active faults crossing the project site and
the site is not within a State of California Earthquake Fault Zone. Therefore, the likelihood of
surface fault rupture at the project site is low. As a result, seismic ground shaking and surface
fault rupture impacts are considered less than significant.
Table 3.6-1
Summary of Major Active Faults
Fault Name Approximate Distance
from Site (Mi.)
Maximum Moment
Magnitude
San Joaquin Hills 7.7 6.6
Puente Hills Blind Thrust 8.5 7.1
Whittier 8.9 6.8
Newport-Inglewood (L.A. Basin) 10.4 7.1
Chino-Central Avenue (Elsinore) 11.9 6.7
Newport-Inglewood (Offshore) 14.8 7.1
Elsinore (Glen Ivy) 15.2 6.8
San Jose 16.3 6.4
Palos Verdes 20.1 7.3
Upper Elysian Park Blind Thrust 21.7 6.4
Sierra Madre 23.1 7.2
Cucamonga 24.2 6.9
Raymond 24.9 6.5
Source: EEI, July 2012.
Ground Lurching or Shallow Ground Rupture
Based on the geography, topography and site-specific geotechnical conditions, the potential for
ground lurching or shallow ground rupture at the project site is low; however, due to the active
seismicity of California, this possibility cannot be completely ruled out. In light of this, the
unlikely hazard of lurching or ground-rupture should not preclude consideration of “flexible”
design for onsite utility lines and connections.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-22
Liquefaction Potential
Liquefaction is a phenomenon in which the strength and stiffness of a soil is reduced by
earthquake shaking or other rapid loading. Liquefaction and related phenomena have been
responsible for substantial structural damage in historical earthquakes, and are a design concern
under certain conditions. Liquefaction occurs in saturated soils; soils in which the space between
individual particles is completely filled with water. This pore water exerts a pressure on the soil
particles that influences how tightly the particles themselves are pressed together. Prior to an
earthquake, pore water pressure is typically low; however, earthquake motion can cause the pore
water pressure to increase to the point where the soil particles can readily move with respect to
each other. When liquefaction occurs, the strength of the soil decreases and the ability of a soil
deposit to support structural loads are reduced. The City of Anaheim General Plan Safety
Element does not identify any areas of potential liquefaction within or in proximity to the project
site. The project area is relatively flat and no near surface static ground water exists at the site.
In addition, soils comprising of the Quaternary-aged Alluvium underlies the site. As a result, no
significant impacts are anticipated.
Seismically Induced Settlement
Seismically induced settlement can occur due to reorientation of soil particles during strong
shaking of unsaturated sands, as well as in response to liquefaction of saturated loose granular
soils. The total seismically induced settlement is estimated to be less than 1 inch. Differential
earthquake induced settlements are estimated to be less than 0.5 inch across a 50-foot span.
These measurements are not considered to be significant amounts of seismically induced
settlement.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-23
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant geology and soils effects identified in and considered by
FSEIR No. 339.
3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
FSEIR No. 339 evaluated greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions associated with build-out of the
PTMLUP based on the Technical Advisory for addressing climate change through CEQA
released in 2008 by the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research and the amended CEQA
Guidelines (released on December 30, 2009). Operational emissions were calculated for area
sources (including project-related water demand, energy use, and waste disposal) and
transportation sources. An estimate of construction emissions was also generated.
Build-out of the PTMLUP would generate substantial greenhouse gas emissions and
cumulatively contribute to climate change impacts in California. Implementation of mitigation
measures related to solid waste reduction, transportation and motor vehicles, energy efficiency,
and water conservation and efficiency would reduce greenhouse gas emissions, however, the
emission levels would continue to represent a Significant and Unavoidable Adverse Impact and a
Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by City Council. Despite this finding,
build-out of the PTMLUP would be consistent with statewide and regional greenhouse gas
reduction strategies to integrate land uses and improve transportation planning.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
The proposed Platinum Gateway Project involves an overall increase in the number of residential
units (79 units) within the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable
square footage for non-residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square
feet of commercial) over what was previously analyzed. Operational GHG emissions include the
direct emissions from vehicle trips and natural gas use and the indirect emissions resulting from
the off-site generation of electricity used on-site and used to obtain, transport, and treat water
used on-site. As shown in Section 3.16 Transportation/Traffic of this addendum, the average
daily trips associated with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project is approximately 72 percent
less than the trips associated with the land uses analyzed by FSEIR No. 339 for the project site.
Similarly, the proposed project will reduce the number of vehicle miles traveled by 45,481 VMT.
Therefore, GHG emissions from vehicle trips would be reduced by approximately 72 percent. In
addition, it is determined in Section 3.17, Utilities and Service Systems of this addendum that the
proposed project will generate less demand for utilities including natural gas, electricity, and
water. This decrease in both vehicular trips and demand for utilities would result in a reduction
in GHG emissions related to the proposed project. Therefore, the proposed Platinum Gateway
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-24
Project will not increase GHG emissions levels beyond what was analyzed in FSEIR No. 339,
and no new long-term GHG emissions impacts would occur.
The proposed Platinum Gateway Project is a high-density residential infill development that will
provide housing opportunities in close proximity to retail, service, entertainment and office
opportunities in a pedestrian-friendly environment; reducing vehicular trip lengths and number
of vehicular trips. The Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) provides several bus
routes along the project site which connect users to the Anaheim Metrolink Station and the future
Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), further reducing the number of
vehicular trips. In addition, the project as designed is in compliance with Title 24 of the State
Building Code to reduce energy consumption and will meet building efficiency requirements per
the relevant mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No. 339. Therefore, similar to FSEIR No.
339, the proposed project is consistent with statewide and regional greenhouse gas reduction
strategies. The proposed project does not result in a new significant environmental impact nor is
there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
Therefore, approval of the proposed project would not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339
related to greenhouse gas emissions.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant greenhouse gas emissions impacts identified in and
considered by FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-25
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
Building Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 24 California Code of Regulations).
Appliance Energy Efficiency Standards (Title 20 California Code of Regulations).
Motor Vehicle Standards (AB 1493).
AB 32: California Global Warming Solutions Act.
Executive Order S-3-05: Greenhouse Gas Emission Reduction Targets.
Executive Order S-01-07: Low Carbon Fuel Standard Program.
City of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 10.18, Water Conservation Ordinance No. 6138
(adopted April 14, 2009).
Assembly Bill 939 (Sher, Chapter 1095, Statutes of 1989).
Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339
The following mitigation measures related to GHG were previously adopted in connection to
FSEIR No. 339 and are stated throughout this document as applicable to the proposed project.
These mitigation measures would reduce vehicle GHG emissions or GHG emissions associated
with energy use.
Solid Waste Measures
2-3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit
Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D)
recycling and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials.
These plans shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the
project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling
of materials on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a
project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts
made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer
recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private
firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at
the project site. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-32, Mitigation Measure No. 2-3)
10-18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property
owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the
Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with
AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-26
of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of
Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall
remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at
its discretion, the following plan components:
Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities.
Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.
Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate
space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.
Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible to
reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection.
Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage
recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible.
Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and city
regulations.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-42, Mitigation Measure No. 10-18)
10-19 Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as
feasible, by the property owner/developer:
Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.
Collection of office paper for recycling.
Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil,
batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-19)
10-20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance
of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a
Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works
Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The
plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project
and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of
materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or
transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within
Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials,
such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use
in construction of other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site. (FSEIR No.
339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-20)
Transportation and Motor Vehicle Measures
2-5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no
later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-27
owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational
CO, NOX, ROG, and PM10 emissions:
Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Platinum Gateway
Traffic Impact Analysis Update, LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012
Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parsons
Brinckerhoff, August 20+10 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall
be implemented as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.
The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as required
by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site frontage
routes as needed.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-5)
9-14 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to
determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be
constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. (FSEIR No.
339, page 5.9-115, Mitigation Measure No. 9-14)
Energy Efficiency
2-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/architect shall submit energy
calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the
California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Division that shows each new
structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum
of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit,
plans shall show the following:
a) Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce
roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the
energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building
materials and suppliers can be found at the following website:
http://eetd.lbl.gov/CoolRoofs/ or other similar websites.
b) Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous
materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways not
within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and
subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool
pavement materials are available at: http://www.epa.gov/heatisld/
images/extra/level3_pavingproducts.html or other similar websites.
c) Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy
Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances (e.g.,
EnergyStar® appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or double-
paned windows.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-28
d) Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing
over 50,000 square-feet.
e) Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the building structure
to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and
office buildings.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.2-33, Mitigation Measure No. 2-6)
10-22 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate
on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance
with Title 24, which may include the following:
High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.
Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.
Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.
Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.
Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.
Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air-
handling units, and fan-coil units).
Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.
Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit signage.
Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking
lots.
Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or facilities
that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods.
Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as:
o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering
for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems.
o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per kWh saved
for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency that exceed
Title 24 requirements..
o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.
Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush [gpf] or less).
Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).
Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.
Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-44, Mitigation Measure No. 10-22)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-29
Water Conservation and Efficiency
10-7 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate
compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines.
This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:
Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible;
Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash down of
exterior areas;
Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals;
Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;
Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems
which use moisture sensors;
Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;
Low-flow shower heads in hotels;
Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are lowest;
Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using
appliances;
Cooling tower recirculating system;
Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;
Use of waterway recirculation systems;
Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify
which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans. (FSEIR No. 339, page
5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-7)
10-9 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first,
the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation
meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures) (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-40, Mitigation Measure No. 10-9)
10-12 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office
and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials
pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the
U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation
Measure No. 10-12)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-30
10-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features
including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless
water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient
appliances. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-13)
10-14 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines
and use recycled water when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be
designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. (FSEIR No. 339, page
5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-14)
3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, impacts related to hazards and hazardous materials were identified
as less than significant through the initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not
contain any specific analysis related to hazards and hazardous materials.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
The following section is summarized from information provided in the Phase I Environmental
Site Assessment for the project site prepared by EEI on February 7, 2012. The Phase I
Environmental Site Assessment is provided in Appendix B of this Initial Study/Addendum.
Records Search
Based on historical records such as aerial photographs, topographic maps, and City directories
and building records, the project site was developed with orchards and a rural residence from at
least 1938. The property remained in this configuration until 1968 when the orchards were
cleared. In 1970, a building was constructed and originally occupied by Whirlpool Corporation.
Additions to the structure were reportedly made in 1978 and 1989. The building has been
occupied by various commercial/industrial tenants since that time.
The Orange County Health Care Agency, California Department of Toxic Substances Control
(DTSC), and the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) were contacted, and other
State and Federal databases were reviewed to determine if the project site, or any adjacent
properties, were listed as hazardous waste generators, underground storage tank releases (UST),
or as having other environmental concerns (i.e., spill, leak, or aboveground tank). Neither the
project site nor any immediately adjacent properties were listed on any of the databases
researched.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-31
Four nearby sites were identified as closed LUST cases, where the soil only was impacted. The
sites include: Texaco Service Station located 100 feet southwest at the southwest corner of East
Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street at 818 East Katella Avenue, Former Tosco 76 Station
#8800 aka Unocal located 100 feet south at the southeast corner of East Katella Avenue and
South Lewis Street at 1818 South Lewis Street, Jaycox Disposal located 100 feet south across
Katella Avenue at 1016 East Katella Avenue, and Westrux International Trucks located 100 feet
south across Katella Avenue at 1110 East Katella Avenue. Based on regulatory oversight, and
“case closed” status of the releases, these sites are not considered to be an environmental concern
at this time.
Asbestos-Containing Materials
According to Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulations, buildings
constructed prior to 1980 are considered to have “Presumed Asbestos-Containing Materials
(PACM) unless otherwise sampled and analyzed. Based on the approximate age of the existing
building (early 1970’s) the presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACM) is likely. Building
materials will be carefully assessed prior to demolition in compliance with SCAQMD Rule 1403.
Therefore no impacts are anticipated.
Lead-Based Paint
Lead has long been recognized as a harmful environmental pollutant and old lead based paint
(LBP) is a significant source of lead exposure in the U.S. today. Most structures built before
1960 contain heavily leaded paint. Some buildings built as recently as 1978 may also contain
lead paint. Based on the approximate age of the structure (early 1970’s), the presence of lead
based paint is likely. These materials will be handled in accordance with all relevant local, State,
and Federal regulations and no significant impacts are anticipated.
Radon
Radon is a radioactive gas which has been identified as a human carcinogen. The U.S.
Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) recommends that homeowners in areas with radon
screening levels greater than 4 Picocurries per liter (pCi/L) conduct mitigation of radon gas to
reduce exposure. The EPA’s Map of Radon Zones (EPA-402-R-93-071) was reviewed for radon
levels based on such factors as indoor radon measurements, geology, aerial radioactivity, and soil
permeability. The EPA has identified Orange County as Zone 3, having a predicted average
indoor radon screening level less than 2 pCi/L, which is considered a low to nominal risk to the
property. Therefore, radon is not considered a significant environmental concern at this time.
Polychlorinated Biphenyls
The disposal of Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB’s) is regulated under the Toxic Substances
Control Act (TSCA, 1976), which banned the manufacture and distribution of PCB’s. The EPA,
under TSCA guidance, regulates the removal and disposal of all sources of PCB’s containing 50
ppm or more. Any electrical equipment containing dielectric insulating fluids or coolants,
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-32
manufactured prior to 1976, should be considered as potentially PCB-containing. This includes
transformers, capacitors, and fluorescent light fittings. In addition, PCB’s may also be found as
a stabilizer in older lubricating oils, pesticide extenders, cutting oils, hydraulic fluids, paints,
sealants, and flame retardants (UNEP, 1999). Also, due to the age of the structure (pre-1978) on
the project site, the structure may contain older fluorescent lighting mounts and/or interior
electrical transformers. Older lighting fixtures and/or electrical transformers may contain small
amounts of PCBs. These materials will be handled in accordance with all relevant local, State,
and Federal regulations and no significant impacts are anticipated.
Site Reconnaissance
During a site reconnaissance of the project area, small quantities of paint, lubricants, cleaning
products and propane/electric batteries were observed in the New Image Office Design and
Evriholder Products suites. Small quantities of pharmaceutical products and bio-waste were
observed in the Golden West Medical suite. The quantities of these stored chemicals are
considered de minimus and not an environmental concern. No other evidence of environmental
concern was noted on the project site.
Future Construction
Construction activities pursuant to implementation of the proposed project will involve the use of
chemical agents, solvents, paints, and other hazardous materials. Future contractors will be
required to implement standard best management practices (BMPs) and good housekeeping
practices in accordance with the City's Municipal Code to control hazardous materials in use
during demolition and construction. During construction, no significant impact is expected from
the routine use and disposal of these materials.
Future Operation
Future residential uses will not create or allow any new threat of site contamination involving the
production, transport, or disposal of hazardous materials, beyond that which was contemplated in
FSEIR No. 339. Because of the limited amount of on-going use of household cleaning agents,
there is no significant risk of contamination. As a result, no significant impacts are anticipated.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-33
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant hazards and hazardous materials effects identified in and
considered by FSEIR No. 339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
Federal Emergency Planning and Community Right-To-Know Act (EPCRA) of 1986.
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) standards, Part 1926.
Hazardous Materials Release Notification – California Health and Safety Codes §§ 25270.7,
25270.8, and 25507.
Proposition 65 – Notification Requirements for Presence of Hazardous Materials in Workplace -
Title 22, California Code of Regulations, Article 1, §§ 12102 et seq.
Lead Containment – California Health & Safety Code sections 17920.10 and 105255.
Asbestos and Building Demolition – SCAQMD Rule 1403.
PCB Disposal – 40 Code of Federal Regulations part 761.
3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Hydrology
According to FSEIR No. 339, the portion of the Platinum Triangle east of State College
Boulevard is located within the Santa Ana River Watershed and the portion of the Platinum
Triangle west of State College Boulevard is located within the Westminster Watershed. The
Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project site is located within a Federal Emergency
Management Agency (FEMA) flood insurance study area within the Zones A99 and X
designations. Additionally, the Platinum Triangle is located within the Orange County
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-34
Groundwater Basin. Although FSEIR No. 339 identified that implementation of the Platinum
Triangle would increase the demand on groundwater supplies, it was determined that adequate
water supplies would be available without lowering the local groundwater table level.
Water Quality
FSEIR No. 339 incorporated the water quality analysis prepared and included in FSEIR No. 332
for the Platinum Triangle. As discussed, pollutant concentrations for the project condition were
anticipated to decrease both with and without the best management practices (BMPs) as a result
of changes in land use, which in general would result in less light industrial/commercial and
more mixed uses. With implementation of mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No. 332,
anticipated pollutant concentrations were expected to further decrease and the project water
quality impacts would be less than significant; water quality conditions were expected to be
better than the existing conditions at the time of the report. FSEIR No. 339 found that no
significant unavoidable adverse effects were anticipated from the implementation of the
Platinum Triangle.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
A Preliminary Hydrology Report and Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP)
were prepared by Hall & Foreman, Inc. for the project site in September 2012. The Preliminary
Hydrology Report and Preliminary WQMP can be found in Appendices C and D, respectively.
Existing Hydrologic Conditions
The Platinum Gateway Project site is located within Flood Zone X (Other Flood Areas) as
identified by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map
(FIRM) Panel 0142J (142 of 539), Map Number 06059C0142J. Soil classification is 'A' type
soils. The soil classification boundary limit is based on Plate 'A' from the Orange County
Hydrology Manual. The site naturally drains from the northeast to the southwest end of the site.
The site is considered flat with a maximum elevation drop of approximately 3 feet over a
distance of approximately 850 feet. The project site is predominantly covered by impervious
surfaces, with isolated landscape and pervious surfaces along the frontage to South Lewis Street
and East Katella Avenue. The rear of the property consists of an unpaved access/loading area for
the existing building.
As shown on Exhibit 3.9-1 Existing Hydrology Map, drainage discharges to public storm drains
and/or roadway facilities located at the following locations: (1) Drainage from the easternmost
part of the site is collected in a concrete cross gutter and drains south before discharging into
Katella Avenue via the existing easternmost driveway; (2) Drainage from the westernmost part
of the site is collected in an above ground concrete gutter and is directed to an inlet at the
southwest corner of the property. This inlet is then connected by an underground storm drain
line to an existing catch basin located at the northeast corner of the Katella Avenue and Lewis
Street intersection; and (3) Located at the northwestern corner of the property is an existing
headwall/inlet which collects water received from the rear of the existing building. Drainage
Exhibit 3.9-1 EXISTING HYDROLOGY MAP0 45’90’Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CATEMPLETONPLANNING GROUPSource: Hall & Foreman, Inc. PLATINUM VISTA - NOT A PART(NOT A PART)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-36
from this inlet enters a below ground storm drain system that joins the existing storm drain
within Lewis Street. The tributary to this system includes a small portion (0.18 acres) of
tributary area from the neighboring property to the north. In addition, an existing concrete
channel collects water from the property located northeast of the project. The tributary area to
this concrete channel is approximately 5.4 acres. This off-site drainage is received on-site at the
northeast corner of the project, and continues west along the northerly property line before being
collected by the aforementioned headwall/inlet.
Proposed Hydrologic Conditions
Topography under developed conditions would be very flat throughout the site. As shown on
Exhibit 3.9-2 Proposed Hydrology Map, a series of “bird-baths” or sump areas would generally
be located within the interior courtyard areas of the residential building to allow minimum grades
while maintaining uniform elevation for the building. These sump areas would be drained by
catch basins/inlets and connected through a network of below ground storm drain lines.
Emergency overflow provisions for the interior courtyards would include scupper and/or channel
drains extending through the multiple utility corridors of each respective courtyard.
The proposed storm drain system would closely mimic that of the existing condition and would
discharge at the same three locations. The existing storm drain infrastructure would connect to a
78-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) within Lewis Street and a 54-inch RCP within Katella
Avenue. From there, storm flows continue to the East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel
before ultimately reaching Anaheim Bay/Huntington Harbor and the Pacific Ocean. The existing
connecting storm drain systems within Katella Avenue and Lewis Street are currently under
capacity. Therefore, peak flows resulting from the project will not exceed the peak flows under
the existing condition.
Due to the City of Anaheim’s planned widening of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street, the project
site will lose acreage along the frontage of these two roadways. This will be slightly offset by
acreage gained at the northern property line where the Connector Street will encroach onto the
neighboring property to the north. The net loss of tributary drainage area for the proposed
project is 0.19 acres.
Approximately 0.69 acres of the project site would be a tributary to a below ground storm drain
system running east to west within the Connector Street. This storm drain system would also
receive the off-site drainage at the northeast corner of the property before running west within
the Connector Street, and would ultimately join the existing 78-inch RCP storm drain line within
Lewis Street. Approximately 3.78 acres of the project site would be a tributary to a below
ground storm drain system running north to south within the Connector Street. This storm drain
system will run south within the Connector Street and ultimately join the existing 54-inch RCP
storm drain line within Katella Avenue. It should be noted that this north-south system would
ultimately receive the drainage from the adjacent proposed Platinum Vista project.
The remaining on-site tributary areas would also be collected in a below ground storm drain
system. This system would serve those areas fronting both Katella Avenue and Lewis Street,
Exhibit 3.9-2 PROPOSED HYDROLOGY MAP0 45’90’Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CATEMPLETONPLANNING GROUPSource: Hall & Foreman, Inc. PLATINUM VISTA - NOT A PART(NOT A PART)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-38
and represents approximately 4.04 acres of the project site. This system is proposed to join the
existing catch basin at the northeast corner of the Katella Avenue and Lewis Street intersection.
Due to grade limitations, it is recommended that the invert of the existing storm drain line being
connected be lowered a minimum of 2.5 feet as part of the Katella Avenue widening project to
allow on-site drainage systems to gravity flow to this point of connection.
Due to the introduction of an underground storm drain system in the developed condition, peak
flows will experience a minor increase from those of the existing condition. However,
underground detention basins located in drainage areas E and G would reduce peak flow. As a
result, the proposed project would produce lower total peak flow and total volume compared to
the existing condition. The percentage of impervious area and peak storm flows and volumes
will be similar to the previously proposed hotel, office, and residential uses and will not create a
substantial increase in on- or off-site erosion potential or flooding potential. Therefore, no new
significant impacts are anticipated which have not been addressed in FSEIR No. 339.
Water Quality
Water Quality Standards and Waste Discharge
Since the project will disturb one acre or more of soil during construction, it is subject to the
requirements of the State General Construction Activity NPDES permit. Permit applicants are
required to submit a Notice of Intent to the State Water Resources Control Board, prepare a
Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP), and implement Best Management Practices
(BMPs) detailed in the SWPPP to reduce construction effects on receiving water quality by
implementing erosion control measures using the best available or best conventional control
technology. Typical BMPs include plastic sheeting over soil piles, berms to direct runoff to a
designated area, sandbags, silt fencing, screens, and dust control. The proposed project is
considered a “priority project” as defined in the City’s Local Implementation Plan (LIP) and
therefore shall consider that site design BMPs, routine non-structural and structural source
control BMPs, and treatment control BMPs be implemented on-site.
Under the municipal Orange County NPDES permit issued by the Santa Ana RWQCB, the City
of Anaheim is required to ensure that discharges from its municipal storm drain systems do not
cause or contribute to exceedances of receiving water quality standards (designated beneficial
uses and water quality objectives) for surface waters or groundwaters. In accordance with
Mitigation Measure 3-2 of FSEIR No. 339, a preliminary WQMP has been prepared (see
Appendix D) which identifies BMPs that will be used to minimize pollutants in runoff from the
site after construction of the project.
Anaheim Bay is considered an impaired water body and is listed for dieldrin (tissue), nickel,
PCB's (polychlorinated biphenyls) (tissue), and sediment toxicity. Huntington Harbor is also
considered an impaired water body and is listed for chlordane, copper, lead, nickel, PCB's,
pathogens, and sediment toxicity. No Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL’s) for Anaheim Bay
and Huntington Harbor have been developed.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-39
The project will be constructed within an existing developed area, and no additional sources of
polluted runoff are anticipated. The WQMP prepared for the project identifies BMPs required to
reduce impacts to water quality and to ensure that no additional impairments of the Anaheim Bay
and Huntington Harbor occur as a result of the project. Therefore, implementation of the
WQMP will reduce impacts to water quality to less than significant levels.
Groundwater
According to the preliminary geotechnical evaluation prepared for the project, the depth to
groundwater was measured between 80 to 124 feet below ground surface (bgs) at various
locations near the project site. Groundwater was not encountered in any of the exploratory
borings to the maximum depths explored of 51.5 feet below existing grades during the
subsurface exploration. Groundwater is sufficiently deep that it is not anticipated to adversely
impact the proposed development.
The project site is not located in a groundwater recharge area. The site will not utilize
groundwater for operation; water will be supplied by the local municipal water service.
Therefore, no impacts related to groundwater supplies or recharge will result from the proposed
project.
Flood Hazard and Dam/Levee Failure
The project site is located within a 100-Year to 500-Year Flood Zone as identified in the City's
Safety Element of the General Plan (Figure S-6). However, in the event that a flood should
occur, it is expected to be less than one foot deep. Also, the site is located outside of flood
hazard and floodway areas as defined on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM) (FIRM Map for
Orange County and Incorporated Areas, Community Panel 060213, and Panel Map No.
06059C0142J, 2009).
Figure 5.5-5 of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update EIR No. 330 identifies that
the proposed project site is located within the flood impact zone associated with the Prado Dam,
which is located over 15 miles northeast of the proposed project site. Although the proposed
project site is located within the designated flood impact zone, the actual threat of flooding is
low due to the extensive development and natural features that exist between the dam and the
proposed project site, including several freeways, the Santa Ana River, and portions of the Santa
Ana mountain range which would act to block, reduce, or slow the risk of flooding.
Additionally, the Prado Dam is subject to annual safety inspections to ensure that the dam is safe,
performing as intended, and not developing problems (DWR 2010). Therefore, impacts
associated with the risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding would be less than significant.
Inundation by Seiche, Tsunami, or Mudflow
The project site is not within a dam/levee inundation area, a tsunami hazard area, a seiche
inundation area, or subject to mudflows as designated in the City’s Safety Element of the
General Plan (Figure S-3).
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-40
Conclusion
The proposed project will meet all City drainage and flood control requirements and will obtain
an NPDES permit. Off-site storm drains are adequately sized for the proposed project. The
proposed project is expected to have similar impacts related to hydrology and water quality as
was analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. Therefore, the proposed project would not require any changes
to FSEIR No. 339 related to surface hydrology, water quality, and groundwater.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant hydrology and water quality impacts identified in and
considered by FSEIR No. 339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
Future projects shall comply with the Storm Drain Impact and Improvement Fee in the Anaheim
Municipal Code. The Fee is designed to implement the goals in the Master Plan of Drainage for
the South Central Area, the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, the City of Anaheim General Plan,
and the Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drain Financial Implementation Plan for the South Central
City Area, mitigating flooding and storm drainage impacts.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-41
3.10 Land Use and Planning
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Consistency with General Plan Policies
FSEIR No. 339 analyzed the impacts of amending the General Plan Land Use Element to
redesignate approximately 191 acres from the Office High land use designation to the Mixed-
Use designation; redesignate approximately 17 acres from the Institutional land use designation
to the Mixed-Use designation; and reflect a recently constructed park and parks required by
approved development agreements. The General Plan Land Use Element was also amended to
increase the permitted development intensities in the Platinum Triangle, and remove the FAR
requirement for Mixed-Uses and Office Uses in the Platinum Triangle. The total intensity
evaluated in FSEIR No. 339 for Mixed-Use was 18,909 dwelling units, 4,909,682 square feet of
commercial uses, 9,862,166 square feet of office, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional;
4,478,356 square feet of office-high and office-low uses, institutional development at a
maximum floor area ratio of 3.0, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.50,
and open space at a maximum floor area ratio of 0.10. In addition, the Circulation Element was
amended to modify street designations and add Class II bikeways within the Platinum Triangle.
Southern California Gas Company’s Existing Microwave Tower
The Southern California Gas Company (SCG) operates a microwave tower that serves a core
function in the Sempra Utilities data and voice network and provides critical communication
links to the Blythe transmission facility, which plays a key role in transmitting natural gas to
Orange, Riverside, Imperial, and San Diego counties. The microwave tower also serves as the
SCG’s Emergency Operations Center (EOC) for the Orange County area.
According to SCG, introduction of high-rise buildings in the line-of-sight of the microwave
tower and prohibition on rooftop telecommunications towers without any shielding or covers
would interfere with the proper telecommunications function of the microwave tower both at the
local level and throughout southern California. Potential land use conflicts would be from the
individual projects north of the microwave tower that may obstruct the tower’s line-of-sight. As
of the date of FSEIR No. 339 certification, these projects included Stadium Lofts (completed in
January 2007); Stadium Park Apartments (approved/not under construction); Park Viridian
(completed); Stadium Club Condos (approved/not under construction); Platinum Vista
(approved/not under construction); Platinum Gateway (approved/not under construction); and
Dwell @ Katella (92 units under construction). However, most developments north of the tower
were approved for podium style structures that would not exceed five stories and would not
interfere with the telecommunication function. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that implementation
of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be inconsistent with the City of
Anaheim General Plan’s Public Services and Facilities Element related to the operation of a
Southern California Gas Company microwave tower, resulting in a Significant and Unavoidable
Adverse Impact. A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council
related to this land use impact.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-42
Consistency with Zoning Designations for the Project Area
According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project required a
zoning reclassification to add properties to the PTMU Overlay Zone to create new ARTIC and
Office Districts and expand the Katella and Orangewood Districts. Consequently, Chapter
18.20, PTMU Overlay Zone of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code was amended to: 1)
reflect the boundary changes; 2) provide development standards for ARTIC, Stadium, Arena,
and Office Districts; and 3) modify zoning standards, including, but not limited to, vacant lots
and setbacks and parking structure requirements for hotels and offices. FSEIR No. 339
concluded that the proposed reclassification and Zoning Code Amendment would not degrade
the integrity of or conflict with the PTMU Overlay Zone objectives.
Consistency with the Adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan
As analyzed in FSEIR No. 339, implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project required the following amendments to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan
(PTMLUP): reflect the proposed General Plan amendments; adjust the boundaries of the PTMU
Overlay Zone to create the ARTIC and Office Districts and expand the Katella and Orangewood
Districts; distribute the proposed increased development intensities; replace Updated and
Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A with Updated and Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 106C; and reflect technical refinements and clarifications including, but
not limited to, refinements to street cross-sections, density descriptions and exhibits.
The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) includes the following planning
principles:
• Balance and integrate uses
• Stimulate market-driven development
• Create a unique, integrated, walkable urban environment
• Reinforce transit oriented development opportunities
• Maintain and enhance connectivity
• Create great neighborhoods
FSEIR No. 339 found that expansion of the PTMLUP would not degrade the integrity of or
conflict with the PTMLUP’s planning principles. In addition, the creation of the ARTIC District
would reinforce transit-oriented development opportunities, and adjustment of mixed-use
boundaries would enhance connectivity and create dynamic neighborhoods.
Consistency with the Compass Blueprint 2% Strategy and Regional Transportation Plan
In 2004, SCAG adopted the Compass Blueprint, which is a part of the 2004 regional growth
forecast policy that attempts to reduce emissions and increase mobility through strategic land use
changes. Goals for areas identified in the Compass Blueprint include locating new housing near
existing jobs and new jobs near existing housing, encouraging in-fill development, promoting
development with a mix of uses, creating walkable communities, providing a mix of housing
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-43
types, and focusing development in urban areas. A portion of the Platinum Triangle has been
designated by SCAG as a strategic area in which to focus growth. This area contains the future
ARTIC that will be served by Amtrak, Metrolink commuter rail, and Orange County
Transportation Authority bus services. The Platinum Triangle is consistent with the overall
Compass Blueprint in that it directs additional housing and mixed-use opportunities near to
existing and future jobs in the Orange County subregion and locates new jobs near to transit.
The 2008 Regional Transportation Plan’s (RTP’s) goals and policies link the goal of sustaining
mobility with the goals of fostering economic development, enhancing the environment,
reducing energy consumption, promoting transportation-friendly development patterns, and
encouraging fair and equitable access to residents affected by socio-economic, geographic, and
commercial limitations. FSEIR No. 339 determined that the Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project would be consistent with the Regional Transportation Plan.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
General Plan Consistency
A General Plan Amendment is being proposed to increase the allowable number of residential
units in the Platinum Triangle area by 79 units, and decrease the allowable office and
commercial uses by 209,419 square feet and 114,571 square feet, respectively. The property is
designated “Mixed-Use,” which allows for the development of residential uses as identified in
the Land Use Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan. The increase in the allowable
Platinum Triangle area residential dwelling units will assist the City in ensuring adequate
housing availability. The General Plan Amendment is only being proposed in order to change
the intensity of the uses, by increasing residential and reducing office and commercial uses.
Therefore, no significant impacts are associated with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project.
The proposed increase in the maximum number of residential units and decrease in the maximum
office and commercial square footage in the Platinum Triangle area will not be detrimental to the
public health, safety and welfare of the community. The introduction of the residential use into
the PTMU Overlay Zone area will reduce overall peak hour trips and will benefit the public by
dispersing traffic to alternate hours. Additionally, the project site will be compatible with the
Platinum Vista, a future residential complex that is currently being processed for the
development of 350 dwelling units located adjacent to the project site at 1005 – 1105 East
Katella Avenue. Just east of the future Platinum Vista residential complex are the existing
Vivere condominium complex located at 1331 East Katella Avenue, and the existing Park
Viridian apartment homes complex located at 1515 East Katella Avenue. The proposed project
will be compatible with these aforementioned residential projects in terms of similar building
heights, scale, and density. Compatibility of the proposed project with each of the General Plan
Elements is presented below.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-44
Land Use Element
The General Plan Land Use Element designates the property as Mixed-Use. The Mixed-Use
land use category provides opportunities for an integrated mix of residential, retail, service,
entertainment and office opportunities in a pedestrian-friendly environment. Mixed-Use areas
encourage the use of transit service and other forms of transportation, including pedestrian and
bicycle travel. Residential development in these areas emphasizes quality and offers a variety of
amenities. Structured parking is an essential component in most mixed-use developments. The
scale, size and mixture of uses in the mixed-use areas vary based upon the character of the
surrounding area. The Platinum Gateway Project is located within the Platinum Triangle Mixed-
Use Overlay Zone. Since the project is proposing to locate 399 dwelling units directly adjacent
to existing and proposed residential projects, and numerous office and light industrial businesses,
vehicular dependency will be reduced while pedestrian-friendly walkways will encourage
walking and biking to nearby areas. The residential project not only complies with, but also
embraces the Mixed-Use land use category by placing residents in close proximity to restaurants,
services and entertainment, creating a beneficial mix of uses for both residents and businesses.
Circulation Element
The project site is located at the northeast corner of East Katella Avenue and South Lewis Street.
A traffic impact analysis update has been prepared in order to adequately and accurately
determine the overall traffic impacts of the proposed project (See Appendix E). Due to the fact
that the project will generate less traffic than the currently entitled land uses, the elimination of
office and commercial square footage and the construction of the 399 dwelling units will reduce
traffic impacts compared to what was previously analyzed for this project site. According to the
traffic impact analysis update, the proposed project would significantly impact the intersection of
South Lewis Street and East Katella Avenue based on the City’s performance criteria. However,
Katella Avenue is planned to be widened in 2013, before completion of the proposed project
which will mitigate project impacts to less than significant. The widening of Katella Avenue is a
City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and
is funded by the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District (CFD).
The proposed residential development is located off of Katella Avenue offering a number of
OCTA bus routes. The bus system provides access to nearby employment and commercial areas,
the Anaheim Metrolink Station which is located approximately 1 mile east at 2150 East Katella
Avenue, as well as a connection to other areas within and outside of the City. Bus routes
offering transit service within the project vicinity include the following:
1. Route 43: Fullerton – Costa Mesa
2. Route 46: Los Alamitos – Orange
3. Route 47: Fullerton – Newport Beach
4. Route 50: Long Beach – Orange
5. Route 54: Garden Grove – Orange
6. Route 57: Brea – Newport Beach
7. Route 59: Anaheim – Irvine
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-45
8. Route 83: Anaheim – Laguna Hills
9. Route 430: Anaheim Metrolink/Amtrak Station – Anaheim Resort Area
10. Route 757: Pomona – Santa Ana Express
Green Element
The objectives of the Green Element are to: “Expand public parks and open space amenities;
improve the City’s trail and bicycle network for local and regional connections; beautify arterial
corridors with landscape plans, edge treatments and gateways; and use existing opportunities,
such as easements, vacant land and the Santa Ana River to expand accessible open space and
recreation opportunities.” Although the project site is located within a highly urbanized area,
several of the Green Element’s objectives will be satisfied through the design of the proposed
project. More specifically, the proposed project will provide several recreational amenities and
leisure areas throughout the project including a 17,570 square foot public park, and 88,610
square feet of recreation-leisure areas comprising of six landscaped courtyards, an entry
courtyard, a club house and fitness center, and landscaped areas along East Katella Avenue,
South Lewis Street and the Connector Street. The project will also be responsible for payment of
community park fees consistent with the most recent City Council adopted fee resolution.
The Green Element also includes goals for conserving natural resources. The project is designed
with water-conserving plumbing fixtures and water efficient irrigation to conserve water
resources. Additionally, the project as designed is in compliance with Title 24 of the State
Building Code. This Title requires certain features be incorporated into the design of the project
in order to reduce energy consumption. With Title 24 compliance, the project is meeting the
goal by conserving energy. Due to the location of the proposed project, biological and mineral
resources will not be affected.
Public Services and Facilities Element
The Public Services and Facilities Element anticipated and required by this General Plan
Element include fire protection and emergency services, police services, electric, water and
private utilities, sanitary sewer and storm drain systems, solid waste disposal, schools, libraries,
and community centers and cultural facilities. All of these public facilities are being addressed
throughout the processing of the project through the City of Anaheim. For example, the
Anaheim Police Department and the Anaheim Fire Department are responsible for reviewing the
project plans for compliance with their regulations. Refer to Section 3.14 Public Services of this
document for further discussion.
Growth Management Element
The purpose of the Growth Management Element reads: “To ensure that growth is based on the
City’s ability to provide adequate levels of traffic management and other public facilities and
services pursuant to the Countywide Traffic Improvement and Growth Management Component
of Measure M.” The purpose of this Element is satisfied and addressed through project
implementation. Similar to the Circulation Element goal, a traffic impact analysis update has
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-46
been prepared in order to adequately and accurately determine the overall traffic impacts of the
proposed project. Due to the fact that the project will generate less traffic than the currently
entitled land uses, the elimination of office and commercial square footage and the construction
of the 399 dwelling units will reduce traffic impacts compared to what was previously analyzed
for this project site.
Additionally, Goal 1.1 of the Element looks to provide a balance of housing options and job
opportunities throughout the City. The project aids in satisfaction of this Goal by providing
residential land uses in close proximity to job centers, thereby potentially reducing the travel
time and commute costs for the future residents who would be forced to live farther from their
place of work should the project site be developed for office/commercial uses.
Safety Element
The stated purpose of the Safety Element is to: “Identify potential hazards that can significantly
impact the City; provide policies to minimize potential dangers to residents, workers, and
visitors, and to reduce the level of property loss due to a potential disaster; and, identify ways to
respond to crisis situations.” Implementation of the project will satisfy the goals of this element.
The project will be constructed consistent with all applicable building and zoning code statutes.
Being that the project is located in a built urban environment, there are no areas of high fire
hazard within close proximity. The project site is located within a 100-Year to 500-Year Flood
Zone as identified in the City's Safety Element of the General Plan (Figure S-6). Figure 5.5-5 of
the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update EIR No. 330 identifies that the proposed
project site is located within the flood impact zone associated with the Prado Dam, which is
located over 15 miles northeast of the proposed project site. However, in the event that a flood
should occur, it is expected to be less than one foot deep. As further discussed in Section 3.9
Hydrology and Water Quality of this addendum, although the proposed project site is located
within the designated flood impact zone, the actual threat of flooding is low due to the extensive
development and natural features that exist between the Prado Dam and the proposed project
site, including several freeways, the Santa Ana River, and portions of the Santa Ana mountain
range which would act to block, reduce, or slow the risk of flooding. Also, the site is located
outside of flood hazard and floodway areas as defined on the Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
(FIRM Map for Orange County and Incorporated Areas, Community Panel 060213, and Panel
Map No. 06059C0142J, 2009).
Noise Element
The goal of the Noise Element is to: “Protect sensitive land uses from excessive noise through
diligent planning and regulation.” This goal will be met through the design of the residential
project, including the use of architectural acoustic upgrades in the form of Sound Transmission
Class (STC)-rated windows and doors in residential units. Compliance with the California
Building Code would ensure that interior noise levels meet the required limits.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-47
Economic Development Element
The goal of the Economic Development Element reads: “Create a major, mixed-use regional
center in the Platinum Triangle providing employment, shopping, entertainment, and housing for
residents, employees and visitors.” The proposed project will satisfy this goal by introducing a
large-scale residential development which will provide a market for the growing retail and office
uses in the Platinum Triangle area.
Community Design Element
The goal of the Community Design Element reads: “The Platinum Triangle will become a
dynamic, mixed-use center of regional interest, providing retail, office, residential, employment,
and entertainment opportunities.” This goal is met through the design of the proposed residential
project. The proposed project will provide a quality, high-density urban housing development
that is integrated into the surrounding area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets,
convenient transit connections and arterial access. The proposed project will also include a
public park to meet the recreational needs of the site’s residents and neighboring uses.
Housing Element
One of the goals of the Housing Element states: “Expand the community’s supply of housing,
including opportunities for extremely low, very low, low, and moderate income households.”
Given this goal, the project site’s 399 dwelling units will help increase the City’s housing supply,
improve the City’s jobs-housing balance, and provide new residential opportunities within easy
access to a variety of office, commercial, retail, entertainment, and sports facilities.
Consistency with the Adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan
Implementation of the Platinum Gateway Project would require an amendment to the PTMLUP
to amend the allotted residential units and office and commercial square footages allocated to the
project site and the public park site consistent with the General Plan amendment. The proposed
project would not degrade the integrity of or conflict with the plan’s principles. The Platinum
Gateway Project satisfies the planning principals by creating a residential development within a
mixed-use area which balances and integrates the surrounding uses and reinforces transit-
oriented design.
Consistency with the Zoning Ordinance
Under the Zoning Code, the project site is designated as I (Industrial) Zone and the Platinum
Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone. The Platinum Gateway Project will be increasing
the overall dwelling unit cap of 18,909 dwelling units within the PTMU by 79 dwelling units to
18,988 units and will decrease the overall office and commercial densities of 9,862,166 square
feet and 4,909,682 square feet, respectively, to 9,652,747 square feet and 4,795,111 square feet,
respectively. The additional 79 units will alter the Katella District residential development
density by increasing the maximum number of dwelling units from 5,707 to 5,786. The project’s
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-48
proposed density increase of 79 units will provide new residential opportunities within easy
access to a variety of office, commercial, retail, entertainment, and sports facilities.
The increase in allowable dwelling units allows the City to improve its jobs/housing balance.
The residential development is complementary to the surrounding existing and future uses and is
compatible with the improvements in the vicinity. Locating housing near work opportunities
reduces traffic and contributes to the improvement of air quality. As a result, no significant
impacts are associated with the proposed Zone Amendment.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant land use impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR
No. 339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
The Proposed Project shall be designed in accordance with all relevant development standards
and regulations set forth by the City of Anaheim Municipal Code (as amended), including the
PTMU Overlay Zone (as amended), the Platinum Triangle MLUP (as amended) and the
Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement (as amended).
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-49
3.11 Mineral Resources
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related to mineral resources were identified through the
initial study process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis
related to mineral resources.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
According to the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element, the proposed project is not
located in an area designated as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) or a Regionally Significant
Aggregate Resource Area (Resource Sector). In addition, the project site is currently developed
and no mineral resources operations exist on the project site. The proposed project would not
result in the loss of any mineral resources. Therefore, no impacts to mineral resources are
anticipated.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant mineral resource impacts identified in and considered by
FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-50
3.12 Noise
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, noise in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area
was measured by the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL), which is an average of all
measured noise levels over a 24-hour period based on the “A-weighted decibel” (dBA). Noise
standards for various land uses were identified and noise measurements were taken at five
locations along local roadways. Major sources of noise in the Platinum Triangle include Angel
Stadium of Anaheim, Honda Center, The Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Stadium
Metrolink/Amtrak Station, and existing light industrial land uses, distribution facilities, hotels,
offices, restaurants, and supporting retail. Additionally, noise from several new residential
communities within the Platinum Triangle, vehicular traffic, occasional aircraft overflights, and
rail traffic would all contribute to the existing urban noise environment.
Traffic Related Noise
According to FSEIR No. 339, noise impacts due to project implementation would occur
primarily from project-related traffic. The Platinum Triangle would result in new significant
noise increases along multiple roadway segments representing a Significant and Unavoidable
Adverse Impact as identified in SEIR No. 332. Impacts to noise-sensitive uses sited in close
proximity or adjacent to major arterials, freeways, railroads, industrial or entertainment uses, the
ARTIC District, or Angel Stadium of Anaheim would experience Significant and Unavoidable
Adverse noise impacts, similar to those identified in SEIR No. 332.
Adjacent Industrial-Source Noise
FSEIR No. 339 found that residences within the Platinum Triangle could be exposed to
stationary-source noise from activities conducted at the adjacent industrial areas. Noise from
industrial uses could occur during the nighttime hours when residences are most sensitive to
extraneous noise sources. Primary noise generators from these types of industrial/commercial
uses include truck idling, loading, and unloading activities. Both FSEIR No. 332 and FSEIR No.
339 identified potentially significant impacts for any noise-sensitive uses sited in close proximity
or adjacent to industrial uses.
On-Site Recreation
According to FSEIR No. 339, noise generated at pocket parks within the Platinum Triangle
would be primarily from voices. However, all roadways modeled within the Platinum Triangle
generate substantially greater noise levels, and use of the recreational areas is typically restricted
to daytime hours. Therefore, noise generated by pocket parks would not generate substantial
levels of stationary-source noise at existing noise-sensitive receptors. As a result, noise impacts
from these sources associated with the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be
less than significant.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-51
Interior Noise
Pursuant to the California Building Code, noise-sensitive habitable rooms would be required to
be designed to achieve an interior noise standard of 45 dBA CNEL. Due to the high volumes of
traffic and proximity of new noise-sensitive developments adjacent to the major arterials,
freeways, and railroads, building facades that are exposed to noise levels that exceed 69 dBA
would require architectural acoustic upgrades in the form of Sound Transmission Class (STC)-
rated windows and doors in new residential units. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that compliance
with the California Building Code would ensure that interior noise levels meet the required
limits. Therefore, interior noise levels would be less than significant.
Short-Term Construction Related Noise
Construction activities related to build-out of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project
would result in vibration levels exceeding the Federal Transit Administration’s (FTA’s) criteria
for vibration-induced structural damage within the Platinum Triangle and would be considered
significant and unavoidable. Construction impacts would result in temporary exceedances of the
65 dBA standard up to 446 feet (397 feet for residential construction) from the construction site
and impacts would be significant and unavoidable.
A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted by the City Council for these Significant
and Unavoidable Adverse noise impacts.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
As in FSEIR No. 339, noise impacts due to project implementation would occur primarily from
project-generated traffic and short-term construction noise.
Long-Term Traffic Related Noise
Traffic noise will be generated from along site major roadways and access roads including East
Katella Avenue, South Lewis Street, and the Connector Street. Long-term noise levels would be
less than future noise levels analyzed as part of FSEIR No. 339. The proposed Platinum
Gateway Project involves an overall increase in the number of residential units (79 units) within
the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable square footage for non-
residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial) over
what was previously analyzed. As shown in Section 3.16 Transportation/Traffic of this
addendum, the average daily trips associated with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project is
approximately 72 percent less than what was previously analyzed for this project site. This
decrease in vehicular trips would decrease noise impacts related to the proposed project.
Therefore, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project will not increase noise levels beyond what
was analyzed in FSEIR No. 339, and no new long-term noise impacts would occur.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-52
Short-Term Construction Related Noise
Construction associated with the proposed project would occur in proximity to noise- and
vibration-sensitive uses, including the existing four-story Vivere condominium complex located
approximately 300 feet east of the project site at 1331 East Katella Avenue, and the existing five-
story Park Viridian apartment homes complex located approximately 700 feet east of the project
site at 1515 East Katella Avenue. Construction would occur over a 24-month period and would
involve standard contractor’s equipment typical for the demolition, site preparation, grading,
landscaping, and construction of the parking structure and residential building. Construction
activities will cause annoyance to sensitive land uses when construction equipment is operating
nearest to the receptors due to noise levels and exposure to substantial levels of groundbourne
vibration and groundbourne noise. According to FSEIR No. 339, the 65 dBA CNEL contour
would fall at a distance of approximately 397 feet for residential construction; therefore the
nearest sensitive receptor, residents of the Vivere condominium complex could experience
CNEL levels higher than 65 dBA.
According to the City’s Noise Ordinance, noise sources associated with construction are exempt
from the City’s Noise Ordinance standards between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM. While
the City exempts construction noise from the 60 dBA standard at the property line when
construction occurs during these hours, construction noise would have the potential to generate
noise levels well above the existing ambient noise levels; vibration impacts would also result in a
nuisance to sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the construction site, in particular the residences
east of the proposed project site. These impacts would represent significant, short-term noise
and vibration impacts that would cease after completion of construction. Consistent with FSEIR
No. 339, these impacts are considered significant and unavoidable. However, development of
the less intense project would shorten the construction time due to the elimination of office and
commercial uses; thereby reducing the amount of time in which sensitive receptors would be
affected. Additionally, implementation of the existing mitigation measures identified in FSEIR
No 339 will further reduce impacts to noise. Thus, no new noise impacts would occur and no
new mitigation measures would be required.
Anticipated short-term and long-term noise levels are not expected to increase beyond levels that
have been considered previously in FSEIR No 339. The proposed project would not create a
new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-53
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant noise impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR No.
339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
State of California Interior and Exterior Noise Standards are incorporated into the California
Building Code (Title 24, Part 2, California Code of Regulations) and are the noise standards
required for new construction in California.
Community Noise Standards adopted by the City of Anaheim in the General Plan, Noise
Element.
City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 6.20, Sound Pressure Levels: Stationary Noise
Standards.
City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 6.20, Construction Noise.
City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.20.160, Compatibility Standards.
FTA groundborne vibration and noise impact criteria.
Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339
The following mitigation measures are taken directly from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation
measures apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project.
5-1 Prior to approval of street improvement plans for any project-related roadway widening,
the City shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design project acoustical features that
will limit traffic noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are below the City’s noise
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-54
ordinance. These treatments shall be noted on the street improvement plans to the
satisfaction of the Planning Department and may include, but are not limited to, the
replacement of windows and doors at existing residences with acoustically rated windows
and doors. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-38, Mitigation Measure No. 5-1)
5-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project property owner/developers shall submit
a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report
shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected
noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter, stationary sources (e.g., industrial,
commercial, stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior noise standards as follows:
a) The report shall demonstrate that the proposed residential design will result in
compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise levels, as required by the
California Building Code and California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24 and
25 of the California Code of Regulations).
b) The report shall demonstrate that the Proposed Project residential design shall
minimize nighttime awakening from stadium event noise and train horns such that
interior single-event noise levels are below 81 dBA Lmax.
The property owner/developer shall submit the noise mitigation report to the Planning
Director for review and approval. Upon approval by the City, the project acoustical
design features shall be incorporated into construction of the Proposed Project. (FSEIR
No. 339, page 5.5-39, Mitigation Measure No. 5-2)
5-4 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall
submit evidence to the satisfaction of the Planning Director that occupancy disclosure
notices regarding potential for exterior noise levels to be elevated during sounding of
train horns will be provided to all future tenants facing an at-grade crossing of the Orange
County Line. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-39, Mitigation Measure No. 5-4)
5-5 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, to reduce noise and vibration impacts from
the impact pile driver, the construction contractor shall evaluate the feasibility of using
auger cast piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct cast-in-place piles for a pile-
supported transfer slab foundation system. This alternative construction method would
reduce the duration necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or eliminate the need
to use pile drivers altogether. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted
to the Planning Department in the form of a letter from the construction contractor.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-40, Mitigation Measure No. 5-5).
5-7 Ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer
shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to
limit construction-related noise:
a) Noise generated by construction, shall be limited by the property owner/developer
to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as
governed by Chapter 6.70, Sound Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-55
b) Limit the hours of operation of equipment that produces noise levels noticeably
above general construction noise levels to the hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
c) All internal combustion engines on all of the construction equipment shall be
properly outfitted with well maintained muffler systems.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-40, Mitigation Measure No. 5-7)
5-8 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to properly maintain and tune all construction equipment
to minimize noise emissions. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-41, Mitigation Measure No. 5-8)
5-9 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible
for requiring project contractors to locate all stationary noise sources (e.g., generators,
compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-41, Mitigation Measure No. 5-9)
5-10 Ongoing during construction activities, material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment
servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal
Code, Section 6.70. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.5-41, Mitigation Measure No. 5-10)
3.13 Population and Housing
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
FSEIR No. 339 concluded that no significant impacts were anticipated regarding housing and
employment in the Platinum Triangle upon project implementation. The EIR indicated that the
jobs/housing ratio in the City will be 1.77. Adherence to the Housing Element of the City’s
General Plan, which is aimed at the provision of adequate housing supplies, would help ensure
adequate housing availability within the City and the Platinum Triangle. No mitigation measures
were required.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
The proposed project involves an overall increase in the number of residential units (79 units)
within the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable square footage for
non-residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial)
over what was previously analyzed. This represents a 0.4 percent increase in residential units
and a 1.7 percent decrease in non-residential square footage (1.5 percent decrease in office
square footage and 2.3 percent decrease in commercial square footage) compared to what was
planned for in FSEIR No. 339. As shown on the following Table 3.13-1, the proposed change in
land use intensities will change the current jobs/housing ratio in the Platinum Triangle from 2.19
to 2.15. This less than significant change to the Platinum Triangle area will have an even smaller
impact to the overall jobs/housing ratio for the entire City of Anaheim. Therefore, the proposed
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-56
project will not significantly alter the current projected jobs/housing ratio of 1.77 for the City of
Anaheim.
Table 3.13-1
Estimated Population, Housing and Employment Generation for the Platinum Triangle
Land Use FSEIR No. 339 Platinum Gateway
Change
Revised Platinum
Triangle
Housing 18,909 DU 28,364
population +79 DU +119
population 18,988 28,482
population
Office 14,340,522 SF
41,500
employees
-209,419 SF
- 648
employees
14,131,103
SF 40,852
employees Commercial 4,909,682 SF -114,571 SF 4,795,111 SF
Institutional 1,500,000 SF -- 1,500,000 SF
Jobs/Housing
Ratio 2.19 -- 2.15
Note: Based on a population generation rate of 1.5 persons per dwelling unit and an employment generation factor
of 500 square feet per employee.
Source: FSEIR No. 339
FSEIR No. 339 found that no significant impacts are anticipated regarding housing and
employment in the Platinum Triangle upon project implementation. Adherence to the Housing
Element of the City’s General Plan, which is aimed at the provision of adequate housing
supplies, will help ensure adequate housing availability within the City and the Platinum
Triangle. As a result, the Platinum Gateway Project does not require any changes to FSEIR No.
339 related to housing and employment. No mitigation measures are required.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-57
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant population and housing effects identified in and considered
by FSEIR No. 339.
3.14 Public Services
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
FSEIR No. 339 analyzed impacts to public services including fire protection, police protection,
schools, libraries, and child care services.
Fire Protection Services
According to FSEIR No. 339, the City of Anaheim Fire Department (AFD) provides fire
protection, emergency rescue and medical services to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project area. There are 11 fire stations located throughout the City plus one station in the
Disneyland Resort. No fire stations currently exist within the Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project area, however, the two nearest fire stations are located approximately one-half
mile from the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. Stadium Station #7 is located
at 2222 East Ball Road, and Resort Station #3 is located at 1717 South Clementine. AFD has a
plan to construct three new fire stations to serve the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project area. The first station, the Battalion Headquarters Station will be located along Santa
Cruz Street north of Orangewood Avenue, the second station will be located in the north central
area of the Platinum Triangle, and the third station will be located at an undetermined location.
FSEIR No. 339 indicated that due to the additional population, density, and usage generated by
the development of the Platinum Triangle, demand for emergency medical services, ambulance
transportation, and rescue operations would increase. These increases would result in delayed
response times for first engine response, and additional fire facilities were identified as necessary
to provide adequate fire protection services. The impact on fire protection services is considered
significant. Additional fire facilities and staff needed to serve the Platinum Triangle as a result
of the increase in service demands would be funded through payment of the Public Safety Impact
Fee as development within the Platinum Triangle progresses. FSEIR No. 339 found that with
implementation of mitigation measures, no significant and unavoidable impacts to fire protection
services were anticipated.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-58
Police Protection Services
According to FSEIR No. 339, law enforcement and crime prevention services are provided by
the Anaheim Police Department (APD). The City of Anaheim is divided into four districts and
one police heliport. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is located within the
South Police District. The two nearest police facilities are Main Station, located 3.5 miles west
of the Platinum Triangle at 425 S. Harbor Boulevard, and South Station, located 3.6 miles west
of the Platinum Triangle at 1520 Disneyland Drive. As of July 1, 2010, the APD is authorized
for 370 sworn officers. According to the APD, the development of the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project would create an increase in service calls, which would create a need
for additional officers and support personnel, office space, vehicles and equipment, resulting in a
significant impact. However, FSEIR No. 339 found that with implementation of mitigation
measures, no significant unavoidable impacts on police protection were expected.
School Services
FSEIR No. 339 stated that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is located
within the boundaries of the Anaheim City School District (ACSD) and the Anaheim Union
High School District (AUHSD) and within the attendance boundaries of Paul Revere Elementary
School, South Junior High School, and Katella High School. A demographic consultant for the
ACSD conducted a survey of current student generation rates for residential projects in Southern
California that are similar to the type of residential development that would occur in the
Platinum Triangle, and found the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate
fewer students than the number of students expected to be generated from the traditional housing
type. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would
generate new students within these school district boundaries that would necessitate the need for
new school facilities. Additionally, the serving elementary school is located outside the
boundaries of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area; therefore, project
implementation would create a need for additional buses and supporting services. However,
implementation of mitigation measures, including payment of school impact fees in compliance
with Senate Bill 50, would reduce these impacts to less than significant levels.
Library Services
As indicated in FSEIR No. 339, the Anaheim Public Library system consists of a central library,
five branch libraries, and two bookmobiles. The nearest library facility to the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project area is the Sunkist Branch Library located at 901 South Sunkist
Avenue. A joint use library facility with the Anaheim City School District located at 2135 South
Mountain View Avenue was under construction at the time of EIR preparation. The Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is also served by virtual Anaheim Library services
through the network at the Central Library located at 500 West Broadway. According to FSEIR
No. 339, implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would increase
demand for library collections, staff, space, and services, resulting in a potentially significant
impact. This impact would be reduced to a less than significant level through mitigation.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-59
Day Care Services
Privately owned and operated day care and child care centers are located throughout the City of
Anaheim. Three day care centers are located within or in close proximity to the Platinum
Triangle including Tara Hill Montessori School located at 2130 West Crescent Avenue,
Childtime Learning Center located at 1000 South State College Boulevard, and Kinder Care
Learning Center located at 2515 East Street. It was determined that development of the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would increase the demand for day care centers and child
care facilities in the project area. However, permitting the uses in the PTMU Overlay Zone as
primary and accessory uses would allow development of day care centers where necessary to
serve the Platinum Triangle residents. Therefore, development of the Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project would not result in any adverse impact.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
Fire and Police Protection Services
The proposed project involves an overall increase in the number of residential units (79 units)
within the Platinum Triangle and a corresponding decrease in the allowable square footage for
non-residential intensity (209,419 square feet of office and 114,571 square feet of commercial)
over what was previously analyzed. This equates to an additional 119 residents and a reduction
of 648 employees. FSEIR No. 339 identified mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to
fire and police protection services to below a level of significance, including the provision of
buildings equipped with fire sprinklers, buildings designed with Crime Prevention Through
Environmental Design Guidelines (CPTED), and the collection of required impact fees. Through
implementation of these existing mitigation measures, impacts to fire and police protection
services will be reduced to less than significant.
School Services
As shown on Table 3.14-1, the addition of 79 residential units will generate 59 more K-12
students than was previously analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. However, as previously stated in
FSEIR No. 339, when using a generation rate for residential projects in Southern California that
are similar to the type of residential development that would occur in the Platinum Triangle, the
addition of 79 residential units generates fewer students than the number of students expected to
be generated from the traditional housing type. Implementation of existing mitigation measures
identified in FSEIR No. 339, including payment of school impact fees in compliance with Senate
Bill 50, would reduce school impacts to less than significant levels.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-60
Table 3.14-1
ACSD and AUHSD Student Generation Rates
Proposed Additional
Dwelling Units Type Generation Rates Additional Students
79 DU
Elementary 0.3609 29
Jr. High 0.1040 8
High 0.1790 14
Total 0.7479 59
Source: FSEIR No. 339
Library Services
The proposed project would add a potential of 119 new patrons including students to the library
system. However, this impact would be reduced to a less than significant level through payment
of developer fees identified in FSEIR No. 339. As a result, potential library service impacts
were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339.
Day Care Services
The addition of 79 residential units will generate 119 more residents than was previously
analyzed in FSEIR No. 339. However, the potential number of babies and children generated
from 79 residential units in the Platinum Triangle area is expected to be less than the number
generated from the traditional housing type. Therefore, impacts to day care services will be less
than significant and were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339.
Conclusion
The proposed project will not significantly impact public services. As a result, potential public
service impacts were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. The Platinum Gateway Project
does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to public services.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-61
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant public services effects identified in and considered by
FSEIR No. 339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
For new construction projects, the Anaheim Fire Department provides both building inspections
and fire protection systems inspections. The Fire Department’s Life Safety Section conducts
final inspections for all building permits within the City, except those for block walls, patios, and
signs. All new developments are constructed to meet the requirements of the State Fire Marshal,
such as building standards relating to fire, published in the latest California Building Standards
Code and the California Fire Code. These standards include safe access in an emergency and
location and placement of fire protection services and systems, including water supply,
guidelines for the use and storage of combustible materials, and building construction for fire
safety. These Standards also include compliance and monitoring inspections.
Resolution No. 2006-149, Chapter 17.36, City of Anaheim. Public Safety Facilities and Vehicle
and Equipment Impact fees for new and expanded development in the PTMU Overlay Zone
Projects that develop within the PTMU Overlay Zone are required to pay a fire facilities fee
consistent with the most recent City Council adopted fee resolution.
Resolution No. 2006-149, Chapter 17.36, City of Anaheim. Public Safety Facilities and Vehicle
and Equipment Impact Fees, requires future projects within the PTMU Overlay Zone to comply
with the applicable provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code relevant to crime prevention and
police services. Projects that develop within the PTMU Overlay Zone are required to pay police
facilities fee consistent with the most recent City Council adopted fee resolution.
Senate Bill 50 (Chapter 407 of Statutes of 1998) (SB 50). SB 50 sets forth a state school
facilities construction program that includes restrictions on a local jurisdiction’s ability require
on mitigation of a project’s impacts on school facilities in excess of fees set forth in Education
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-62
Code 17620. It establishes three potential limits for school districts, depending on the
availability of new school construction funding from the state and the particular needs of the
individual school districts. Level one is the general school facilities fees imposed in accordance
with Government Code Section 65995 as amended. Level two and three fees are alternate fees
that are intended to represent 50 percent or 100 percent of a school district’s school facility
construction costs per new residential construction as authorized by GC Sections 65995.5,
65995.6, and 65995.7. As described in the impact analysis, SB 50 establishes a current level one
fee of $2.97 per square foot for residential development and $0.47 per square foot for
commercial/industrial projects.
Projects that develop under the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use Overlay Zone are required to pay a
Library Fee per the Standard Platinum Triangle Development Agreement.
Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339
The following mitigation measures are taken directly from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation
measures apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project.
7-1 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have
fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be
installed by the property owner/developer prior to each final Building and Zoning
inspection. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-7, Mitigation Measure No. 7-1)
7-2 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public
Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for fire facilities and equipment impact
fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-7,
Mitigation Measure No. 7-2)
7-3 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit plans
to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval for the purpose of
incorporating safety measures in the project design including implementation of
Ordinance 6016 and the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (i.e.,
building design, circulation, site planning and lighting of parking structure and parking
areas). Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking structures (for the police
helicopter). Minimum size for numbers shall be four feet in height and two feet in width.
The lines for the numbers shall be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches apart. All
numbers shall have a contrasting color to the parking structure and shall face the street to
which the structure is addressed. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-11, Mitigation Measure No.
7-3)
7-4 Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit for a parking structure, the property
owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and
approval indicating the provision of closed circuit monitoring and recording or other
substitute security measures as may be approved by the Anaheim Police Department.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-63
Said measures shall be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning inspections.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-11, Mitigation Measure No. 7-4)
7-5 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit
design plans that shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access
points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Anaheim Police
Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim Police
Department. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-11, Mitigation Measure No. 7-5)
7-6 Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim Police Department of Anaheim Traffic
Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control
services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fairshare basis, if
applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-
11, Mitigation Measure No. 7-6)
7-9 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the
school impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Anaheim Union High
School District and Anaheim City School District in compliance with Senate Bill 50
(Government Code [GC] Section 65995 [b][3] as amended). (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.7-
19, Mitigation Measure No. 7-9)
3.15 Recreation
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
FSEIR No. 339 states that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate
additional residents (approximately 15,399 residents based upon 1.5 persons per dwelling unit) in
the City of Anaheim. Based on the City’s goal of providing 2 acres of parkland for every 1,000
residents, development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would require
approximately 31 acres of parkland. According to FSEIR No. 339, the recently constructed 0.77-
acre Magnolia Park located north of Katella Avenue at Auburn Way and Wright Circle is the
only existing park facility within the Platinum Triangle area. FSEIR No. 339 also classifies large
Park Deficiency Areas within the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. Therefore,
FSEIR No. 339 concluded that development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project
would increase the demands on existing parks and recreational facilities that are already subject
to overuse, resulting in a significant impact.
To serve the demand for parks within the Platinum Triangle, developers of residential units in
this area are required to pay higher park-in-lieu fees to provide the funding necessary for the
development of future parks as residential uses are introduced into this area. Development on
parcels eight acres or larger with over 325 residential units are required to provide and construct
an on-site privately maintained public park, ensuring that small parks are distributed throughout
the residentially developed portions of the Platinum Triangle. These mini-parks must be at a
minimum size of 44 square feet per each dwelling unit within the proposed development. This
park requirement is in addition to the payment of park-in-lieu fees; however, the value of the
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-64
parkland dedication is credited against the overall park-in-lieu fees paid for the project. This
credit is given for parkland dedication only and does not include improvements to the park. In
addition, every development is required to provide 200 square feet of recreational-leisure area for
each dwelling unit within private and/or common areas. FSEIR No. 339 concluded that impacts
would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of mitigation; the
dedication of property to the City for park and recreational facilities; the development and
maintenance of pocket parks by the developer or homeowners’ associations; and the payment of
enhanced park-in-lieu fees as required under the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section
18.20.110.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
The proposed project will allow for the development of up to 399 dwelling units, which will
generate approximately 599 residents and create an increase in demand for recreational facilities.
Based on the parkland, mini-park, and recreational-leisure requirements for projects located in
the Platinum Triangle, the proposed project would require approximately 1.2 acres of parkland, a
17,556 square foot (0.40 acre) mini-park, and 79,800 square feet of recreational-leisure areas.
These requirements will be met through the design of several recreational amenities and leisure
areas throughout the project, including a 17,570 square foot public park, and 88,610 square feet
of recreation-leisure areas comprising of six landscaped courtyards, an entry courtyard, a club
house and fitness center, landscaped areas along East Katella Avenue, South Lewis Street and
the Connector Street, as well as private spaces connected to each dwelling unit. The park will
contain a variety of active and passive amenities, including a children’s playground, a fenced
multi-use open turf play area, group picnic shelters with two barbecues, game tables, picnic
tables, park benches, dog waste bag dispensers and enhanced accent paving. The six landscaped
courtyards will each have their own unique theme, such as the pool, lounge, garden, patio, and
kitchen. As identified in FSEIR No. 339, the Platinum Gateway Project will be required to pay
Platinum Triangle park in-lieu fees per the City’s parkland requirement. Collectively, these
recreational amenities and park in-lieu fees meet the park dedication requirement and conditions,
including PTMU Overlay Zone standards with respect to amount of private recreational space
per unit. Therefore, no significant impacts are anticipated.
The proposed project will not have any increased impact on the demand for recreational services
and park space above that identified in the EIR, because the project includes on-site recreation
and facilities, and the project applicant is required to pay community park fees. The proposed
project includes a number of recreational amenities to accommodate recreation demand on site,
including a children’s park, pool, spa and barbecue area. Therefore, the proposed project would
not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to recreation.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-65
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant recreation impacts identified in and considered by FSEIR
No. 339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 18.20.110.010. Authorized by the Quimby Act, the City of
Anaheim requires new development to pay a fee or dedicate land for park and recreation
facilities. Developers of parcels eight acres or larger with more than 325 residential units shall
provide and construct an on-site public park at a minimum size of 44 square feet per unit. Said
park shall be bounded on at least one side by a public street with on-street parking. This
requirement is in addition to the payment of park-in-lieu fees; however, the value of the parkland
dedication will be credited against overall park-in-lieu fees paid for the project. This credit will
be given for park land dedication only. No credit will be given for improvements to the park or
for required recreational-leisure areas. Parcels less than eight acres in size shall pay park-in-lieu
fees. If the number of residential development totals 325 units or less, that construction of a park
is not required.
Park Fees. All residential dwelling unit development within the PTMU Overlay Zone requires
payment of the Platinum Triangle Park In Lieu Fees as adopted by the City Council and as
amended from time to time. If the property is eight or more acres in size, the property owner
will dedicate, develop and maintain a mini-park substantially in conformance with an approved
final site plan for the project.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-66
3.16 Transportation / Traffic
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would
significantly impact levels of service (LOS) for the roadway system due to the increased number
of trips generated by the project. However, with implementation of planned roadway
improvements by responsible agencies such as Caltrans and the City of Orange, all arterial
roadways and intersections would operate at an acceptable LOS or no worse than No Project
conditions.
FSEIR No. 339 determined that 31 intersections in the Platinum Triangle area would operate at
an LOS E or F and would require mitigation. With proposed improvements, such as roadway
widening, restriping, facility upgrades, etc., all impacted intersections in the Platinum Triangle
area would operate at an acceptable LOS D or better during AM and PM peak hours. FSEIR No.
339 also identified six segments in the City of Orange and four arterial segments in the City of
Anaheim that would have significant impacts with implementation of the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project. Mitigation measures were identified for these deficient arterial
segments to operate at an acceptable LOS.
Implementation of the recommended improvements was projected to reduce impacted
intersections LOS to a less than significant level. However, mitigation measures recommended
for 13 impacted intersections were determined to be infeasible and project impacts were
identified as significant and unavoidable. Not all identified improvements would be feasible due
to a number of reasons such as the inability to undertake right-of-way acquisitions as a matter of
policy to preserve existing businesses, environmental constraints, or jurisdictional consideration.
Additionally, it was anticipated that a number of improvements would have been economically
infeasible due to the anticipated costs of some of the improvements. Inasmuch as the primary
responsibility for approving and/or completing certain improvements located outside of Anaheim
would lie with agencies other than the City of Anaheim (i.e., City of Orange and Caltrans), the
potential was identified that significant impacts may not be fully mitigated if such improvements
are not completed for reasons beyond the City of Anaheim’s control (e.g., the City of Anaheim
cannot undertake or require improvements outside of Anaheim’s jurisdiction or the City cannot
construct improvements in the Caltrans right-of-way without Caltrans approval) and the project’s
traffic impact would remain significant. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding
Considerations for this impact.
Since the major freeway facilities within the study area, I-5, SR-22, and SR-57 have reached
their design capacity or will have reached it by 2030 and the required physical improvements are
largely the result of background regional traffic, consultation between the City of Anaheim and
Caltrans was determined to be necessary to reach consensus on any potential operational
improvement measures. State highway facilities within the study area are not within the
jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim. Improvements to State Highway Systems were deemed to
be matters of federal, State, regional, and local concern and are planned, funded, and constructed
by the State of California through a legislative and political process involving the State
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-67
Legislature; the California Transportation Commission; the California Business, Transportation,
and Housing Agency; Caltrans; and OCTA. Therefore, impacts to Caltrans facilities were
identified as significant and unavoidable. The City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding
Considerations for this impact.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
Change in Traffic Impacts Due to the Revised Project
FSEIR No. 339 analyzed the following maximum development intensities for the project site:
320 dwelling units, 209,419 square feet of office development, and 114,571 square feet of
commercial use. According to trip generation rates derived from the Anaheim Traffic Analysis
Model, these previously approved development intensities have the potential to generate a total
of approximately 8,892 ADT, including 518 trips in the a.m. peak hour and 885 trips in the p.m.
peak hour. As shown on the following Table 3.16-1, Project Trip Generation Comparison, the
proposed Platinum Gateway Project is forecast to generate 6,433 fewer ADT than the previously
approved project. This represents a 72 percent reduction in ADT which similarly reduces the
overall traffic impacts related to the proposed project by 72 percent.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-68
Table 3.16-1
Project Trip Generation Comparison
Land Use
Size
Units
Total AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ADT In Out Total In Out Total
Existing Maximum Development Intensities
Residential
320
DU 2,563 64 150 214
144
90 234
General Office 209,419 TSF 3,210 385 48 433 73 356 429
Commercial 114,571 TSF 5,786 16 9 25 244 244 488
Subtotal 11,559 465 208 673
461
690 1,151
Internal Capture Reduction (14.53%) -1,680 -68 -30 -98 -67 -100 -167
Subtotal 9,880 398 178 575
394
589 984
Transit Reduction (Additional 10%) -988 -40 -18 -58 -39 -59 -98
Total Previously Approved for the
Platinum Gateway Site
8,892 358 160 518 355 530 885
Proposed Project (399-Dwelling Unit Platinum Gateway)
Residential 399 DU 3,196 80 188 267 180 112 291
Subtotal 3,196 80 188 267
180
112 291
Internal Capture Reduction (14.53%) -464 -12 -27 -39 -26 -16 -42
Subtotal 2,732 68 160 228
153
95 249
Transit Reduction (Additional 10%) -273 -7 -16 -23
-15
-10 -25
Total Proposed Project 2,458 61 144 206 138 86 224
Change in Trip Generation with
Proposed Project
-6,433 -297 -16 -312 -217 -445 -661
Note: Trip generation rates were derived from the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model, provided by the City of Anaheim.
This traffic impact analysis update represents a worst case condition and evaluates the potential
traffic and circulation impacts associated with the development of the Platinum Gateway Project.
Issues addressed in this analysis include off-site intersection impacts, site access, and interface
with the arterial street system.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-69
Specifically, this traffic impact analysis examined the proposed development of 399 residential
units with an associated parking structure and public park. Primary access to the project site will
be provided by a full access driveway (Connector Street) along Lewis Street located north of the
project and a right-in/right-out access driveway (Connector Street) along Katella Avenue located
east of the project. The north and east Connector Streets along the northerly and easterly
boundaries of the project site, will not only provide access and circulation to the project site, but
to the adjacent properties to the north and east as well.
The following intersections were analyzed as part of the proposed project’s study area:
• Interstate 5 (I-5) southbound ramps-Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue
• Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue
• Lewis Street/Katella Avenue
• State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue
• Sportstown/Katella Avenue
• Howell Street/Katella Avenue
• State Route 57 (SR-57) southbound ramps/Katella Avenue
• SR-57 northbound ramps/Katella Avenue
Existing Conditions
Existing Circulation System
Key roadways in the vicinity of the proposed project are as follows:
• Interstate 5. The I-5 freeway is located southwest of the project site and is a major
freeway that extends throughout Orange County. The I-5 freeway in the project vicinity
has four to five mixed flow lanes and one High Occupancy Vehicle (HOV) lane in each
(northbound and southbound) direction. Primary access to the project site from the I-5
freeway is provided via northbound and southbound on/off-ramps at Katella Avenue.
• Katella Avenue. Katella Avenue is the southern boundary of the project site and provides
access to the project site via a right-in/right-out driveway. This roadway is designated as
an east-west Stadium Area Smart Street (eight-lane divided) in the City’s General Plan
Circulation Element. Katella Avenue is also designated as a Congestion Management
Program (CMP) facility.
• State College Boulevard. State College Boulevard is located east of the project site. This
roadway is designated as a north-south Major Arterial (six-lane divided) in the City
General Plan Circulation Element. The roadway is built out to its master-planned lane
geometrics.
• State Route 57 (SR-57). SR-57 is located east of the project site and is a freeway that
extends through Orange County. Direct access to the project site from SR-57 is provided
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-70
via northbound and southbound on/off ramps at Katella Avenue. The SR-57 freeway has
five mixed flow lanes and one HOV lane in each direction through Anaheim.
• Lewis Street. Lewis Street is located immediately to the west of the project. Access to
Lewis Street is provided at the Connector Street. This roadway is designated as a
Secondary Arterial (four-lane undivided) in the City’s General Plan Circulation Element.
Existing Intersection Level of Service Analysis
Peak-hour turn volumes for the study area intersections were obtained from the previous KHR
study which was collected in 2006 and 2007. Based on discussion with the City Traffic
Engineering staff, LSA confirmed the use of the traffic counts from the previous study. Based
on review of historical count data, the traffic counts along majority of the freeways, arterial and
secondary streets around the Platinum Triangle area have gone down after 2006 and 2007. The
traffic volumes in 2011 and 2012 have not returned to 2006 and 2007 levels. Therefore,
analyzing the existing conditions using the 2006 and 2007 counts would present a conservative
analysis. As shown on the following Table 3.16-2, the traffic impact analysis determined that all
study area intersections operate at an acceptable LOS (LOS D or better) in the a.m. and p.m.
peak hours.
Table 3.16-2
Existing Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary
Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS V/C LOS V/C
1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.380 A 0.400
2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.520 B 0.650
3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue A 0.460 B 0.630
4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue A 0.570 A 0.590
5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.280 A 0.390
6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.350 A 0.340
7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.420 A 0.390
8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.450 A 0.490
Notes: Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study.
Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous
(Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008).
Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-71
Opening Year (2016) Baseline Conditions
According to the project applicant, the proposed residential project will be completed by 2016.
Consistent with the previous KHR study, to determine a future (2016) condition, traffic volumes
for other committed and/or approved (cumulative) developments were added to the existing
baseline traffic volumes. In addition, a growth factor of 6 percent was added to the existing
baseline traffic volumes.
Consistent with the previous KHR study, 14 cumulative projects were identified in the opening
year (2016) condition. The following development projects are being proposed in the vicinity of
the project:
1. Stadium Lofts (1,801 E. Katella Avenue): 7,839 sf restaurants, 2,820 sf retail, 390
apartments;
2. Avalon Bay (2100 E. Katella Avenue): 261 apartments, 2,740 sf retail, and 10,000 sf
restaurant;
3. The Hanover Company (1818 S. State College Boulevard): 266 apartments;
4. Anavia (2045 S. State College Boulevard): 265 apartments;
5. Archstone Gateway (2150 S. State College Boulevard): 884 apartments;
6. Platinum Triangle Condominiums (1331 E. Katella Avenue): 337 condominiums;
7. Park Viridian (1515 E. Katella Avenue): 320 apartments, 451 condominiums;
8. Lennar A-Town Metro (1404 E. Katella Avenue): 2,681 residential units, and 150,000 sf
of commercial use;
9. Platinum Tower (2210–2220 E. Orangewood Avenue): 591,500 sf office and 8,500 sf
retail;
10. Orangewood Condominiums (2211 E. Orangewood Avenue): 325 condominiums;
11. Lennar A-Town Stadium (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue): 525 condominiums;
12. Platinum Vista (1105 E. Katella Avenue): 350 residential units;
13. Gene Autry Experience (1969 S. State College Boulevard): 1,208 condominiums,
100,000 sf office and 50,000 sf retail; and
14. Alexan Orangewood (2020 and 2100 E. Orangewood Avenue): 690 apartments.
The project trip generation for the approved and pending projects was calculated using trip rates
documented in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual (7th
Edition) and is presented in the following Table 3.16-3.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-72
Table 3.16-3
Cumulative Projects Trip Generation
Land Use
Size
Units
Total AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
ADT In Out Total In Out Total
Stadium Lofts
(1801 E. Katella Avenue)
Condominiums1
390/
10.66
DU/
TSF
1,732 60 160 220 109 45 154
Avalon Bay
(2100 E. Katella Avenue)
Apartment/Retail/Restaurant2
261/
2.74/10
DU/
TSF
3,033 105 145 250 158 114 272
The Hanover Company
(1818 S. State College
Boulevard) Apartments2
266 DU 1,721 30 119 149
102
55 157
Anavia
(2045 S. State College
Boulevard) Apartments2
265 DU 1,715 30 119 149 102 55 157
Archstone Gateway
(2150 S. State College
Boulevard) Apartments2
884 DU 5,860 71 380 451 371 177 548
Platinum Triangle
Condominiums
(1331 E. Katella Avenue)
Condominiums3
337/
1.300
DU/
TSF
2,286 65 125 190 119 89 208
Park Viridian
(1515 E. Katella Avenue)
Apartments/Condominiums4
320/
451
DU 4,988 146 285 431 262 193 455
Lennar A-Town Metro
(1404 E. Katella Avenue)
Residential/Commercial5
2,681/
150
DU/
TSF
19,418 -171 780 608 1,108 517 1,624
Platinum Tower
(2210–2220 E. Orangewood
Avenue) Office/Retail2
591.5/
8.5
TSF 9,965 1,049 133 1,182
250
1,017 1,267
Orangewood Condominiums
(2211 E. Orangewood
Avenue) Condominiums6
325 DU 2,103 62 120 182 111 81 192
Lennar A-Town Stadium
(2025 E. Orangewood
Avenue) Condominiums7
525 DU 8,941 32 371 403 485 225 710
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-73
Table 3.16-3
Cumulative Projects Trip Generation
Platinum Vista
(1105 E. Katella Avenue)
Residential8
350 DU 2,352 36 143 179 141 76 217
Gene Autry Experience
(1969 S. State College
Boulevard)
Condominium/Office/Retail9
1208/
100/
50
DU/
TSF
8,607 88 328 416 436 298 734
Alexan Orangewood
(2020 and 2100 E.
Orangewood Avenue)
Apartments10
690 DU 2,898 -63 126 63 138 -22 116
Total Trip Generation 75,619 1,540 3,334 4,873 3,892 2,920 6,811
Notes:
1 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Lofts Mixed-Use Development, dated September 2004.
2 Trip generation provided by City of Anaheim Traffic Engineering Staff.
3 Trlp generation based on Anaheim Transportation Analysis for the Platinum Triangle Condominium, dated June 2005.
4 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Stadium Park Residential Development, dated December 2004.
5 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Metro, dated August 2005.
6 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Orangewood Condominiums, dated September 2006.
7 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Lennar A-Town Stadium, dated June 2006.
8 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Platinum Vista, dated July 2012.
9 Trip generation based on Traffic Impact Analysis for the Gene Autry Experience, dated February 2007.
10 Trip generation based on Alexan Orangewood Traffic Impact Study, dated January 17, 2008.
Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012
Opening Year (2016) Intersection Level of Service Analysis
The following Table 3.16-4 Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service
Summary, summarizes the results of the future a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS analysis for all
study area intersections. As this table indicates, all study area intersections will continue to
operate at acceptable LOS (D or better) during both a.m. and p.m. peak hours.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-74
Table 3.16-4
Opening Year (2016) Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary
Intersection
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
LOS V/C LOS V/C
1. Manchester Avenue/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.480
2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue A 0.590 C 0.750
3. Lewis Street/Katella Avenue C 0.750 D 0.840
4. State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue C 0.780 D 0.830
5. Sportstown/Katella Avenue A 0.400 A 0.550
6. SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.470 A 0.420
7. SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue A 0.490 A 0.460
8. Howell Avenue/Katella Avenue B 0.660 B 0.670
Notes: Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the
previous (Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008).
Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012
Project Impacts
Trip Generation
The proposed project considers development of 399 residential dwelling units. The daily and
peak-hour trips for the residential use were generated using trip rates contained in the ITE Trip
Generation Manual, 7th Edition (2003). The proposed project has the potential to generate
approximately 2,681 average daily traffic (ADT), including 203 trips in the a.m. peak hour and
247 trips in the p.m. peak hour.
Trip Distribution and Assignment
Trip distribution defines the regional percentage origins and destinations for a project. Trip
distribution for the proposed project is based on trip distribution used in the previous KHR study.
Approximately 5 percent of the trips are destined north via Lewis Street; 20 percent north via I-5;
5 percent north via State College Boulevard; 15 percent north via SR-57; 10 percent south via
Lewis street; 15 percent south via I-5; 5 percent south via State College Boulevard; 10 percent
south via SR-57; 5 percent west via Katella Avenue; and 10 percent east via Katella Avenue.
LSA adjusted the trip distribution along Anaheim Way and Manchester Avenue to reflect the
one-way streets and actual freeway.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-75
Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Condition
Traffic generated by the project was added to the future traffic volumes at each study area
intersection.
Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Intersection Level of Service Summary Analysis
Table 3.16-5 summarizes the results of the future plus project a.m. and p.m. peak-hour LOS
analysis for all study area intersections. As this table indicates, all study area intersections will
continue to operate at an acceptable LOS (i.e., LOS D or better) in the a.m. and p.m. peak hours
with the exception of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The project will significantly impact the
intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue based on the City’s significance criteria. The project
will add traffic resulting in a volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio change greater than the City
threshold of 0.030. However, this impact was previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339, and the
widening of Katella Avenue to its ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction)
will mitigate the project impacts. Widening of Katella Avenue is a City-initiated improvement
which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and will be constructed before
the construction of the proposed project.
Special Issues
Project Access
As illustrated in the previous Exhibit 2.2-1, Conceptual Site Plan, access to the project site will
be provided via a full-access primary Connector Street along Lewis Street and a right-in/right-
out secondary Connector Street along Katella Avenue. The Connector Street along Lewis Street
is located along the northerly boundary of the project site while the Connector Street along
Katella Avenue is located along the easterly boundary of the project site. Each Connector Street
is approximately 26 feet wide. Access to the parking garage is provided by the two (northerly
and easterly) Connector Streets. These full accesses are also 26 feet wide.
The easterly Connector Street (which connects to Katella Avenue) will also provide access to the
future Platinum Vista development. The proposed plans for the adjacent development shows two
access driveways from the easterly Connector Street.
Traffic generated by the proposed project and the future Platinum Vista project will be
distributed along the Connector Streets, as shown on Exhibit 3.16-1, Opening Year (2016)
Project Traffic Volumes. Based on direction from the City, an all-way stop control analysis was
conducted for the three access locations along the easterly Connector Street for both the
proposed project and the adjacent Platinum Vista project for the Opening Year (2016) with
project conditions. Based on criteria from Section 2B.07 - Multiway Stop Applications from the
Manual on Uniform Traffic Control Devices (MUTCD), it was determined that all-way stop
control was not recommended at the three locations. The intersections should be controlled by
stop sign at the project accesses with uncontrolled traffic operation along the easterly connector.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-76
Table 3.16-5
Opening Year (2016) Plus Project Conditions Intersection Level of Service Summary
Intersection
Opening Year No Project
Conditions
Opening Year Plus Project
Conditions
Difference in
V/C Ratio
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
AM
Peak
Hour
PM
Peak
Hour
LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C LOS V/C V/C V/C
1. Manchester Ave/
Katella Avenue
A 0.470 A 0.480 A 0.480 A 0.480 0.010 0.000
2. Anaheim Way/
Katella Avenue
A 0.590 C 0.750 A 0.600 C 0.750 0.010 0.000
3. Lewis Street/
Katella Avenue
C 0.750 D 0.840 D 0.820 E 0.940 0.070 0.100
4. State College Blvd/
Katella Avenue
C 0.780 D 0.830 C 0.790 D 0.850 0.010 0.020
5. Sportstown/
Katella Avenue
A 0.400 A 0.550 A 0.420 A 0.560 0.020 0.010
6. SR-57 SB Ramps/
Katella Avenue
A 0.470 A 0.420 A 0.480 A 0.420 0.010 0.000
7. SR-57 NBRamps/
Katella Avenue
A 0.490 A 0.460 A 0.500 A 0.470 0.010 0.010
8. Howell Avenue/
Katella Avenue
B 0.660 B 0.670 B 0.680 B 0.680 0.020 0.010
Notes:
Bold V/C Ratio = Significant Impact
Resultant LOS has been calculated using the Intersection Capacity Utilization methodology consistent with the previous
(Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim CA, January 31, 2008).
Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012
NTS
Exhibit 3.16-1
OPENING YEAR (2016)
PROJECT TRAFFIC VOLUMES
Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway, Anaheim, CA
TEMPLETON
PLANNING GROUP
XX/YY AM/PM Peak Hour Volumes
LEGEND
Source: LSA, September 2012
PLATINUM
VISTA
(NOT A PART)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-78
Additionally, a traffic signal analysis was conducted at the locations where the Connector Streets
intersect Lewis Street and Katella Avenue for the Opening Year (2016) with project conditions.
The peak hour volume at the connector intersections is low and they do not satisfy the peak hour
signal warrant. Therefore, a signal is not recommended in the Opening Year (2016) condition.
California Department of Transportation Analysis
According to the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Guide for the Preparation of
Traffic Impact Studies (December 2002), LOS at an intersection is analyzed utilizing the
Highway Capacity Manual (HCM) 2000 methodology. Traffix Version 8.0 computer software
was used to determine the LOS at Caltrans intersections based on the HCM methodology. Based
on Caltrans traffic impact study guidelines, Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the
transition between LOS C and LOS D on State highway facilities. However, Caltrans
acknowledges that this may not always be feasible and recommends that the lead agency consult
with Caltrans to determine the appropriate target LOS.
Consistent with Caltrans methodology, intersection LOS at four State facilities were analyzed
using the HCM 2000 methodology for the existing with and without project conditions. The
following study area intersections were included in this analysis:
• Manchester Avenue/I-5 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
• Anaheim Way/I-5 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
• SR-57 Southbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
• SR-57 Northbound Ramps/Katella Avenue
Table 3.16-6 summarizes the results of the existing (with and without project) a.m. and p.m.
peak-hour LOS analysis for the signalized intersections identified above utilizing the HCM
methodology. Based on the Caltrans methodology, all State facilities are forecast to operate at
LOS B or better in the existing (with and without project) conditions.
Recommended Circulation Improvements
Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed project, consisting of 399
dwelling units, would exceed the City’s performance criteria at one study area intersection in the
opening year (2016) horizon. However, this impact was previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339,
and the following City-initiated geometric improvements for the impacted study area
intersection, which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements, would improve
the intersection capacity utilization (ICU) and/or reduce the ICU to the baseline condition.
Opening Year (2016) Conditions
Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The proposed project will increase the LOS at the intersection from
LOS C to LOS D with an ICU increase of greater than 0.03 at LOS D in the a.m. peak and from
LOS D to LOS E with an ICU increase of greater than 0.01 in p.m. peak hour during the Opening
Year (2016) condition.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-79
Table 3.16-6
Caltrans Methodology Level of Service Summary
Intersection
Existing Conditions Existing Plus Project
Conditions
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
AM Peak
Hour
PM Peak
Hour
LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay
1. Manchester Ave/Katella Avenue B 16.5 B 13.3 B 17.3 B 14.2
2. Anaheim Way/Katella Avenue B 15.5 B 18.9 B 15.5 B 18.9
6. SR-57 SB Ramps/Katella Avenue B 16.3 B 14.8 B 16.4 B 15.1
7. SR-57 NBRamps/Katella Avenue B 17.3 A 9.6 B 17.3 A 9.4
Notes: HCM Delay ratio is used for signalized intersections in the City of Anaheim.
Level of Service (LOS) Analysis prepared based on 2006/2007 counts collected in previous study.
Source: LSA Associates, Inc., September 2012
The addition of a fourth lane in the westbound direction would offset the project’s impact at this
intersection during the a.m. and p.m. peak hour. The recommended improvement will decrease
the Opening Year (2016) ICU and LOS from 0.82 (LOS D) to 0.720 (LOS C) in the a.m. peak
hour and LOS from 0.94 (LOS E) to 0.79 (LOS C) in the p.m. peak hour. Widening Katella
Avenue to its ultimate planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will provide the
additional westbound through lane at the intersection of Lewis Street/Katella Avenue. The
widening of Katella Avenue (4 lanes in the westbound direction) is a City-initiated improvement
which is part of the Platinum Triangle master plan improvements and is funded by the Platinum
Triangle Community Facilities District (CFD). The construction of this widening project will
begin in the first quarter of 2013 and is scheduled to be completed in 9 months.
Conclusion
Based on the results of this traffic impact analysis, the proposed development of 399 residential
units can be implemented and continue to maintain satisfactory mobility and circulation system
performance. Evaluation of intersection LOS shows that the addition of the project traffic to the
opening year (2016) baseline traffic volumes will significantly impact the intersection of Lewis
Street/Katella Avenue, according to the City’s performance criteria. However, this impact was
previously addressed in FSEIR No. 339, and the widening of Katella Avenue to its ultimate
planned width (4 lanes in the westbound direction) will mitigate the project impacts. Widening
of Katella Avenue is a City-initiated improvement which is part of the Platinum Triangle master
plan improvements and will be constructed before the construction of the proposed project.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-80
Additionally, overall traffic related impacts would be reduced by 72 percent compared to the
previously analyzed uses for the project site due to the reduction of office and commercial uses.
Implementation of existing mitigation measures identified in FSEIR No. 339 will further reduce
impacts to transportation and traffic. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in any
new impacts beyond what was evaluated in FSEIR No. 339. As a result, potential traffic impacts
were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. The Platinum Gateway Project does not require
any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to transportation and traffic.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant circulation and transportation effects identified in and
considered by FSEIR No. 339.
Existing Regulations and Standard Conditions
Traffic Fee Program. Any development in the City of Anaheim is required to pay transportation
impact fees per the Anaheim Municipal Code. These fees go towards the funding of the
completion of the City of Anaheim Circulation Element. In addition, within the Platinum
Triangle, any development shall participate in the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities
District, which will fund infrastructure improvements throughout the Platinum Triangle,
including transportation infrastructure requirements. As set forth above, the City shall
sufficiently fund required Project related improvements. The City of Anaheim has historically
utilized a variety of strategies to provide improvements to the citywide circulation system. The
City currently has a traffic fee program in place to fund General Plan improvements assumed
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-81
under build-out No Project and With Project conditions. The City has a long-standing policy that
as development occurs throughout the City, traffic studies are prepared to demonstrate the need
for implementation of the improvements identified in the General Plan, and developer fees and
other local dedicated taxes will contribute to those improvements as needed. The fee, initially
developed in 1993 and updated as needed to include new facilities and updated Capital
Improvement Programs, provides a proper nexus between increased development in the City and
associated traffic impacts to the citywide circulation system. Developers contribute fees to the
City, which uses the fund to implement circulation improvements in the City or as the City of
Anaheim’s local match for leveraging funding from OCTA and Caltrans for circulation system
improvements. Hence, the general plan improvements assumed in the build-out of the Platinum
Triangle, prior to the approval of this plan, are expected to be paid for and implemented through
the City’s existing traffic impact fee program.
Community Facilities District. The City of Anaheim currently has a Community Facilities
District (CFD) in place associated with development in the Platinum Triangle. All projects,
regardless of size, are required to contribute to the CFD. The CFD is expected to contribute
funds to all infrastructure needs in the Platinum Triangle, including transportation. Nearly all of
the mitigation measures in this study within the Platinum Triangle and the City of Orange are
already identified within the CFD. The CFD is programmed to provide funding for
improvements in the Platinum Triangle identified previously and this study has identified
additional improvements that will need to funded on a fair-share basis. Under this Traffic Study
and EIR, the City will provide fair-share funding for all of the intersection improvements in the
City of Orange and the additional deficient intersections within the City of Anaheim not
currently identified within the CFD, as well as fairshare funding to implement appropriate
Caltrans facility improvements. If the costs of identified improvements cannot be covered by the
total funding allocation under the existing CFD, other fee programs or update of the existing fee
programs may have to be implemented to complete the recommended improvements. For
locations within the City of Anaheim and Orange, the fairshares for improvements will dictate
the fair-share cost, priorities, and timeframe of the improvements. For intersections or arterial
segments where the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project contributes a higher share of traffic to
the build-out of the area, those improvements will be a higher priority. The City has proposed
improvement strategies that return all intersections to an acceptable LOS under the 2030 With
Project scenario. The fair-share calculations identify that the Proposed Project contributes a
range of 7 percent to 44 percent of trips to study area intersections. The Proposed Project would
contribute that percentage toward the costs of the recommended improvements. Intersection and
arterial segment improvements in the City of Orange will have fees contributed to them by the
Proposed Project, commensurate with the fair-share analysis. Although these improvements will
be overridden in this SEIR, because Anaheim does not have jurisdiction over the facilities, the
project will be responsible for contributions for the appropriate fair-share toward the
recommended improvements.
Fee Assessment and Fair-Share for Improvements: The City of Anaheim has applied a fairshare
methodology to evaluate the financial responsibility of mitigating Platinum Triangle project
impacts. The methodology is consistent with that outlined in the Caltrans Guide for the
Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. Appendix “B” directing users to use a formula to
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-82
calculate equitable share responsibility for the traffic impacts of proposed projects. For impacts
that are located in adjacent cities where the intersection becomes deficient under the With Project
condition, a fair-share to an improvement cost that achieves acceptable performance is
warranted. The fair-share calculation is based on the difference between the Future With Project
and Future No Project total intersection entering volumes divided by the total growth entering
volume from Existing to Future With Project conditions. The fair-share proportion is based on
the value associated with the peak hour for which the deficiency has been identified. A
computational example of the fair-share analysis is provided in the Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 2010.
Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339
The following mitigation measures related to traffic were previously adopted in connection to
FSEIR No. 339. These measures would also be applicable to this proposed Platinum Gateway
Project.
9-4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property
owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees, Traffic
Impact and Improvement Fees, and Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of
Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of
issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements
provided by the property owner/developer; and participate in all applicable
reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established. (FSEIR No. 339, page
5.9-112, Mitigation Measure No. 9-4)
9-5 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit,
whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for
dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction
easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as
shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the
adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-112,
Mitigation Measure No. 9-5)
9-6 Prior to approval of a Development Agreement for any project forecast to generate 100 or
more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager
utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property
owner/developers shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when
the improvements identified in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft
Traffic Study Report, Parson Brinckerhoff, August 2010 (Appendix F of this SEIR) shall
be designed and constructed. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall
require the property owner/developer to implement traffic improvements as identified in
the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s
General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and
methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339, Orange County Congestion Management
Program and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-83
phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of
service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The Development
Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to
construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system
improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless
alternative funding sources have been identified. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-113,
Mitigation Measure No. 9-6)
9-7 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to
determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the
conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6.
The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and
fair-share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory
levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. At minimum,
fair-share calculations shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-way, and
construction costs, unless alternative funding sources have been identified to help pay for
the improvement.
The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property
owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary
circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. (FSEIR No. 339, page
5.9-113, Mitigation Measure No. 9-7)
9-8 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation
with the City of Orange:
a) The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by
the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair-share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis.
b) The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share
responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange.
c) The Proposed Project shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to
issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount
received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is executed
by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share contribution to
traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at the impacted
locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-84
d) The City shall work with the City of Orange to amend the JCFA to ensure that fair
share fees collected to mitigate arterial and intersection impacts in the City of
Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-113, Mitigation Measure No. 9-8)
9-9 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a regional transportation agency
has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted
freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City
will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
a) The traffic study will identify the Project’s proportionate impact on the specific
freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair share percentage
responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance,
performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339 and
established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and City of
Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines.
b) The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-114, Mitigation Measure No. 9-9)
9-10 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a Building Permit,
whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share
responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City
shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation
programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp
locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City. (FSEIR No.
339, page 5.9-114, Mitigation Measure No. 9-10)
9-11 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit,
whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for
dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction
easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as
shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the
adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts
generated by the project. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-114, Mitigation Measure No. 9-11)
9-14 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to
determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be
constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. (FSEIR No.
339, page 5.9-115, Mitigation Measure No. 9-14)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-85
9-15 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with
the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to
be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a
location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side
bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of
the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.9-115,
Mitigation Measure No. 9-15)
3.17 Utilities and Service Systems
SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
FSEIR No. 339 analyzed impacts to utilities and service systems including wastewater treatment,
water supply, storm drainage, solid waste, electricity, natural gas, and communications. FSEIR
No. 339 concluded that the potential impacts to public utilities and services could be mitigated to
a level of insignificance.
Wastewater Treatment and Collection
According to FSEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is served by
the City of Anaheim’s local sanitary sewer collection system, which is a tributary to the Orange
County Sanitation District (OCSD), District 2. Wastewater from the City sewer system is
conveyed to OCSD’s trunk and interceptor sewers to regional treatment and disposal facilities.
The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is served by the Newhope-Placentia
Trunk (State College Avenue), the Olive Subtrunk, the Orangewood Diversion Sewer, and the
Santa Ana River Interceptor (SARI) line.
It was determined in FSEIR No. 339 that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project
would require sewer improvements to accommodate project buildout. With implementation of
these improvements, the sewer system was anticipated to accommodate development within the
Platinum Triangle based on future buildout conditions. With implementation of the mitigation
measures in FSEIR No. 339, no significant unavoidable impacts were identified. Further, it was
determined that the potential for sewer spills during a ten-year storm event would be low and
would not represent a significant impact.
Water Supply and Distribution Systems
The City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Water Division provides water service to the
Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area. As of 2007–2008, the City received
approximately 79 percent of its water supply from its groundwater wells and 21 percent from the
Metropolitan Water District (MWD). The MWD contracts for water from the State Water
Project (SWP) and the Colorado River. According to FSEIR No. 339, buildout of the Platinum
Triangle would result in a total water demand of 5,249 acre-feet per year. A comparison of
projected demand and supply concluded that there are adequate water supplies to meet the water
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-86
demand created by the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. According to the Water
Supply Assessment (WSA), there would be surplus water through the 20-year planning period.
Rule 15-D of Anaheim’s Water Rules, Rates and Regulations (Plan No. W2524D) specifies the
water facility improvements required to accommodate the projected land use water demands
within the City, including the Platinum Triangle. Under Rule 15-D, a new 3,500 gallons per
minute (gpm) Well No. 45 was constructed in 2003, and currently supplies most of the demands
in and around the Platinum Triangle area. Ultimately, changes in land use projections and
addition of water facilities will require updating Rule 15-D; however, under existing Rule 15-D,
the projected demands for new office, commercial, and industrial land uses have already been
accounted for in determining water facility improvements. The only significant changes, in
terms of projected demand quantity for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, were
the demands resulting from new residential dwelling units. Once the City approves the
necessary improvements, Rule 15-D and associated rates and figures will be revised. According
to FSEIR No. 339, compliance with Rule 15-D would ensure that adequate water facilities are
provided to serve the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Implementation of the
Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan would not adversely impact the water delivery system.
Storm Drain
According to FSEIR No. 339, the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove
Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area (prepared in January 2006) identifies that the existing storm
drainage system under the existing condition in the Platinum Triangle at the time of FSEIR No.
339 preparation was deficient. The analysis determined that specific projects would be evaluated
by the City Engineer to determine if they are located within an area served by deficient drainage
facilities as identified in the appropriate drainage study; it also determined that the developments
in the Platinum Triangle would be required to incorporate additional local systems into their
plans to meet the City’s current drainage criteria in terms of street flooding limits and other
surface flow parameters. Construction of these facilities would occur in compliance with the
standard engineering rules and regulations and would not result in a significant environmental
effect.
Solid Waste
According to FSEIR No. 339, the Olinda Alpha Landfill is the closest facility to the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area and would be the solid waste facility most often
receiving waste from the project site. Development of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project would increase the service demand for solid waste disposal beyond existing conditions
and would provide more solid waste to the Olinda Alpha Landfill. Development of the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate a total of 372,457 pounds (168 tons) of
solid waste per day. However, the Orange County Landfill System has demonstrated this
capacity and regularly imports solid waste from Los Angeles County. Therefore, it was
determined that there would be available landfill capacity in the Orange County landfills to
accommodate the anticipated solid waste stream generated by implementation of the PTMLUP,
individually and cumulatively.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-87
Additionally, implementation of the PTMLUP would generate increased construction and
operational solid waste in the area. However, it was determined that each development project in
the project area would be required to submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division
of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with
AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim
Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Development
projects in the project area would be required to comply with the City’s existing recycling and
diversion programs, which would reduce impacts generated by the additional development
density to a less than significant level.
Electricity
According to FSEIR No. 339, the Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD), Electrical
Division provides electricity to Anaheim’s citizens and businesses. Implementation of the
PTMLUP would increase the electrical load on existing facilities and require upgrades to the
existing 12 kilovolt distribution systems. A number of electric utility improvements were
identified as either in the planning stages or would be required in the future to serve the Platinum
Triangle development, including a new electrical substation. The APUD anticipates that impacts
resulting from the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, assuming all identified
improvements are implemented, would be within the expansion capabilities of the existing
service and such expansion would not be detrimental to the environment. FSEIR No. 339
concluded that impact on electrical service would be considered less than significant.
Natural Gas
The Southern California Gas Company (SCG) provides natural gas service in the City of
Anaheim and has facilities throughout the City, including the Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project area. FSEIR No. 339 states that implementation of the PTMLUP would
increase the natural gas demand in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area and
would require an additional 1.5 miles of gas transmission pipelines; placement of at least two
additional pressure limiting stations; and alteration of at least three miles of existing gas mains in
the area to increase capacity. With necessary system upgrades and facility improvements, SCG
would be able to service the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area with natural gas,
which would be provided in accordance with SCG’s policies and extension rules on file with the
Public Utilities Commission when the contractual arrangements are made. Although the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project was found to create additional demands on natural gas
supplies and distribution infrastructure, the increased demands would be within the service
capabilities of SCG, provided necessary improvements are made in coordination with SCG.
FSEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the PTMLUP would not result in any unavoidable
adverse impacts to natural gas service or resources.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-88
Communications
AT&T and Time-Warner provide telephone and cable television service to the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project area, respectively. According to FSEIR No. 339, no impacts related
to telephone service systems or cable television service were identified through the initial study
process. Consequently, FSEIR No. 339 does not contain any specific analysis related to
telephone service systems or cable television service.
IMPACTS ASSOCIATED WITH THE PLATINUM GATEWAY
FSEIR No. 339 included analysis of the effects of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project on utilities and service systems. The FSEIR identified that the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project and cumulative development that might affect utilities and service
systems will not result in service deficiencies. In addition, a Preliminary On-Site Sewer System
Study was prepared for the proposed Platinum Gateway Project (see Appendix F) which
compares the estimated sewer flows that will be generated by the proposed project to the flows
that would have been generated by the previously approved uses on the project site. The sewer
study determined that the proposed project will generate approximately 256,194 gallons per day,
which is a reduction of 402,502 gallons per day, or 61% less sewer flow compared to the
previously approved project. The study also assessed whether the recently installed Katella
Avenue sewer will have sufficient capacity to handle flows from the proposed project. It was
determined that the Katella sewer has spare capacity and the flows from the Platinum Gateway
Project can be accommodated.
Similarly, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project will generate less demand for other utilities
and service systems compared to the previously analyzed demand in FSEIR No. 339 due to the
decrease in land use intensities on the project site. Fees will be collected at time of development
to ensure that improvements tied to the proposed project will not negatively impact service
providers. FSEIR No. 339 also identified mitigation measures to reduce potential impacts to
utilities and service systems to below a level of significance. As a result, potential utilities and
service systems impacts were adequately addressed in FSEIR No. 339. The Platinum Gateway
Project does not require any changes to FSEIR No. 339 related to utilities and service systems.
Major EIR Revisions Not Required
Based on the foregoing analysis and information, there is no evidence that the changes to the
project require a major change to FSEIR No. 339. The project will not result in any new
significant environmental impact nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of impacts
from that described in FSEIR No. 339.
No Substantial Change in Circumstances Requiring Major EIR Revisions
There is no information in the record or otherwise available that indicates that there are
substantial changes in circumstances that would require major changes to FSEIR No. 339.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-89
No New Information Showing Greater Significant Effects than Previous EIR
This Initial Study/Addendum has analyzed all available relevant information to determine
whether there is new information that was not available at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified
indicating that a new significant effect not reported in FSEIR No. 339 may occur. Based on the
information and analysis above, there is no substantial new information that there will be a new
significant impact requiring major revisions of FSEIR No. 339.
No New Information Showing Ability to Reduce Significant Effects in Previous EIR
There are no alternatives to the project or additional mitigation measures that would substantially
reduce one or more of the significant utilities and service system impacts identified in and
considered by FSEIR No. 339.
Applicable Mitigation from FSEIR No. 339
The following mitigation measures are taken directly from FSEIR No. 339. The mitigation
measures apply to, and will be implemented for, the proposed Platinum Gateway Project.
10-1 The City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located
within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as identified in the latest updated
sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase sewer flows beyond
those programmed in the appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency in an
existing sewer line, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee
mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or
issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs
first, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities,
as required by the City Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development
based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee)
Program, if adopted for the project area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could
include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof. (FSEIR
No. 339, page 5.10-38, Mitigation Measure No. 10-1)
10-2 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where Orange County Sanitation
District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the
City and/or property owner/developer shall coordinate with the OCSD to ensure that all
improvements and construction schedules are coordinated. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-
39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-2)
10-3 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit
for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-90
contact Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding sewer capacity.
Additionally, if requested by the OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place up to
three flow monitoring devices for up to a month to verify capacity and ensure consistency
with the OCSD’s modeling results. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure
No. 10-3)
10-4 Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for each development project, the property
owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the
City Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade structures of the proposed
development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Where
requested by the City Engineer, sewer improvements shall be constructed with larger than
recommended diameter to maintain the surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert
elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above the hydraulic grade line elevation of the
surcharge levels when they are above the pipe crown. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39,
Mitigation Measure No. 10-4)
10-5 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans
within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where OCSD will be upsizing
trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner shall
coordinate with OCSD to ensure that backflow prevention devices are installed by OCSD
at the lateral connections to prevent surcharge flow from entering private properties.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-5)
10-6 Prior to final design approval, additional analysis shall be performed and provided for each
individual project using flow, wet-weather data, and other information specific for that
project in order to obtain more accurate results of the surcharge levels for final design.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-6)
10-7 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate
compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines.
This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient
Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881).
Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:
Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible;
Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash down of
exterior areas;
Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals;
Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;
Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems
which use moisture sensors;
Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;
Low-flow shower heads in hotels;
Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-91
Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are lowest;
Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using
appliances;
Cooling tower recirculating system;
Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;
Use of waterway recirculation systems;
Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water
conservation; and
Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available.
In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify
which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans. (FSEIR No. 339, page
5.10-39, Mitigation Measure No. 10-7)
10-8 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall
provide engineering studies, including network analysis, to size the water mains for
ultimate development within the project. This includes detailed water usage analysis and
building plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval in
determining project water requirements and appropriate water assessment fees. (FSEIR
No. 339, page 5.10-40, Mitigation Measure No. 10-8)
10-9 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first,
the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation
meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet. (City of Anaheim Water
Conservation Measures) (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-40, Mitigation Measure No. 10-9)
10-12 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office
and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials
pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the
U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation
Measure No. 10-12)
10-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features
including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless
water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient
appliances. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-13)
10-14 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines
and use recycled water when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be
designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. (FSEIR No. 339, page
5.10-41, Mitigation Measure No. 10-14)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-92
10-17 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall review the location of each project to
determine if it is located within an area served by deficient drainage facilities, as
identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg
Channel Tributary Area. If the project will increase stormwater flows beyond those
programmed in the appropriate master plan drainage study for the area or if the project
currently discharges to an existing deficient storm drain system or will create a deficiency
in an existing storm drain, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee
mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer shall be required to
install the drainage facilities, as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the impacts of
the proposed development based upon the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones
of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel
Tributary Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City
or final Building and Zoning inspection for the building/ structure, whichever occurs first.
Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure
Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the City
Engineer, which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a
combination thereof. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-42, Mitigation Measure No. 10-17)
10-18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property
owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the
Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with
AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City
of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of
Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall
remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at
its discretion, the following plan components:
Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities.
Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other
substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.
Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate
space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.
Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever feasible to
reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection.
Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage
recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible.
Prohibiting curbside pick-up.
Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and city
regulations.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-42, Mitigation Measure No. 10-18)
10-19 Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as
feasible, by the property owner/developer:
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-93
Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.
Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.
Collection of office paper for recycling.
Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil,
batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-19)
10-20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance
of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a
Demolition and Import/ Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works
Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The
plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project
and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of
materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or
transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within
Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials,
such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use
in construction of other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site. (FSEIR No.
339, page 5.10-43, Mitigation Measure No. 10-20)
10-22 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate
on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance
with Title 24, which may include the following:
High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.
Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.
Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.
Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.
Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.
Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air-
handling units, and fan-coil units).
Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.
Use of compact fluorescent lamps.
Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.
Use of EnergyStar ® exit lighting or exit signage.
Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified.
Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high-
pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking
lots.
Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or facilities
that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods.
Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as:
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-94
o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering
for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems.
o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 per kW or $0.15 per kWh saved
for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency that exceed
Title 24 requirements..
o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial
incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.
Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush [gpf] or less).
Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).
Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.
Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping.
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-44, Mitigation Measure No. 10-22)
10-23 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service
from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim
Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance
with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground
Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance
with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by
the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
Relocate Southern California Edison transmission line underground on Katella
Avenue from west of the Union Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850 feet).
Relocate Southern California Edison communication line underground on Katella
Avenue from Lewis Street to east of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet
west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
Relocate distribution circuits underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to
700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim Way to State
College Boulevard (1,500 feet).
Relocation a distribution circuit underground on Orangewood Avenue from State
College Boulevard to west of the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella
Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Lewis Street from Katella Avenue to Gene Autry
Way (950 feet).
Relocate a distribution circuit underground on Douglas Street from Katella
Avenue to Cerritos Avenue (1,000 feet).
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-45, Mitigation Measure No. 10-23)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-95
10-25 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service
from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim
Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance
with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground
Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance
with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by
the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements
to the current electric facilities:
Two new distribution duct banks on Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to Lewis
Street (800 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell
Avenue (2,000 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on State College Boulevard from Cerritos Avenue to
Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the Santa Ana
River (4,800 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from Haster Street to the east
side of I-5 (2,500 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College
Boulevard (2,500 feet).
A new transmission duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella
Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).
A new transmission duct bank on Lewis Street and Santa Cruz Street from Katella
Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,000 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on the east side of the Angel Stadium parking lot
from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57 (2,000 feet).
A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue
(4,000 feet).
(FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-46, Mitigation Measure No. 10-25)
10-26 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, the property owner/developer
shall provide an electrical load analysis to the City of Anaheim Public Utilities
Department (APUD). The analysis shall include a load schedule and maximum electrical
coincident demand. Should the property owner/developer’s load analysis result in a
contributed load forecasted to exceed 20 MVA above the existing 40 MVA capacity of
the electrical system currently serving the Platinum Triangle area, the APUD will initiate
construction of a new electrical substation within the Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project area. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees for the electrical
substation will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or
another financial mechanism approved by the City. (FSEIR No. 339, page 5.10-47,
Mitigation Measure No. 10-26)
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
3-96
3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance
Implementation of the proposed project does not involve any significant impacts related to
aesthetics, agriculture and forestry resources, biological resources, cultural resources, greenhouse
gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality, land use and
planning, mineral resources, population and housing, public services, recreation, or utilities and
service systems. No significant geologic constraints were identified, although the site will be
subject to seismic ground-shaking typical of all areas of Southern California. Short-term noise
and air quality impacts will be associated with grading and construction activities. These
significant impacts were considered in FSEIR No. 339, and a Statement of Overriding
Considerations was adopted for unmitigated environmental effects, including these air quality
impacts. For all other environmental impacts analyzed, feasible mitigation measures included in
FSEIR No. 339 have been incorporated into the proposed project which avoid or substantially
lessen potentially significant impacts to a less-than-significant level for the reasons set forth in
this Initial Study/Addendum.
Based on the information and environmental analysis of potential environmental impacts
contained in this Initial Study/Addendum, it has been determined that none of the conditions set
forth in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent EIR
have been met and, thus, the City cannot require a subsequent EIR. As described in detail
herein, there are no new significant impacts resulting from the proposed modification nor is there
any substantial increase in the intensity of any previously identified environmental impacts. The
project impacts are not significantly increased due to implementation of the project from
anticipated levels documented in the certified Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 for the Platinum
Triangle.
3.19 Cumulative Impacts
Cumulative impacts were addressed in FSEIR No. 339. As described herein, the proposed
project does not result in any new significant environmental impacts which were not previously
addressed in the certified Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle. As a result,
no new cumulative impacts are associated with the proposed project beyond those previously
identified in the certified Final Subsequent EIR No. 339 for the Platinum Triangle.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
4-1
4
Organizations and Persons Consulted
4.1 City of Anaheim (Lead Agency)
Planning Department
Jonathan Borrego, Principal Planner
Susan Kim, AICP, LEED AP ND, Senior Planner
Vanessa Norwood, Associate Planner
Public Works Department
Keith Linker, Principal Civil Engineer
Raul Garcia, Principal Civil Engineer
Sandip Budhia, P.E., Associate Engineer, Design Services
Doug Park, Principal Transportation Planner
Taher Jalai, Principal Traffic Engineer
David Kennedy, P.E., Associate Transportation Planner
4.2 Project Applicant
The Shopoff Group, L.P.
Brian G. Rupp, Director – Asset Management
4.3 Applicant’s Consultants
Geology and Soils
EEI
William R. Morrison, Senior Geotechnical Engineer
Jeffrey P. Blake, Senior Engineering Geologist
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
4-2
Hydrology, Water Quality, Sewer
Hall & Foreman, Inc.
John C. Hogan, P.E., LEED AP, C.E.O., Principal
Gavin Powell, P.E., LEED AP, Project Manager, Associate
Edward T. Oune, P.E., Q.S.D., Project Manager
Fuscoe Engineering, Inc.
Ian Adam, Principal, LEED AP, QSD, Principal, Stormwater Manager
Bob Strong, P.E., Senior Engineer
Traffic
LSA Associates, Inc.
Tony L. Petros, Principal
Pritam Deshmukh, Senior Transportation Engineer
Kunzman Associates, Inc.
Carl Ballard, Principal, Associate
4.4 Environmental Consultant
Templeton Planning Group (Consultant to the City)
20250 Acacia, Suite 260
Newport Beach, CA 92660
Peter Templeton, Principal
Vanessa Yee, Senior Project Manager
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
5-1
5
List of References
1. City of Anaheim, Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan, July 20, 1999.
2. City of Anaheim, General Plan, Revised September 15, 2011.
3. City of Anaheim, Municipal Code.
4. EEI, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Shopoff Advisors, LP, 905, 915, 917, 1005,
1015, 1025 and 1105 East Katella Avenue, APNS 082-261-23, 082-261-24, 082-261-27,
and 082-261-28, Anaheim, California 92805, February 7, 2012.
5. EEI, Preliminary Geotechnical Evaluation, Proposed Residential Development, Platinum
Gateway, East Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California, July 3, 2012.
6. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA), Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM)
for Orange County and Incorporated Areas, Community Panel 060213, and Panel Map
No. 06059C0142J, 2009.
7. Hall & Foreman, Inc., City of Anaheim, Priority Project, Preliminary On-Site Sewer
System Study, Platinum Gateway, October 2012, revised November 1, 2012.
8. Hall & Foreman, Inc., City of Anaheim, Priority Project, Preliminary Water Quality
Management Plan (WQMP), Platinum Gateway, July 2012, revised September 2012.
9. Hall & Foreman, Inc., Platinum Gateway Preliminary Hydrology Report, July 2012,
revised September 2012.
10. KHR Associates, Platinum Gateway Traffic Impact Study, Anaheim, California, January
31, 2008.
11. LSA Associates, Inc., Traffic Impact Analysis Update, Platinum Gateway Residential
Development (805 and 917 East Katella Avenue) Anaheim, California, September 2012.
12. The Planning Center, The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 339, SCH #2004121045, August 2010.
13. South Coast Air Quality Management District, CEQA Air Quality Handbook, April 1993,
updated November 1993.
Addendum No. 2 to the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent EIR No. 339
Platinum Gateway Project
5-2
14. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG), Southern California Compass
Growth Vision Report, June 2004.
15. State of California, Assembly Bill 32 California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006,
http://www.leginfo.ca.gov/pub/05-06/bill/asm/ab_0001-0050/ab_32
_bill_20060927_chaptered.pdf. September 27, 2006.
16. State of California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping & Monitoring
Program Website: ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/FMMP/pdf/2010/ora10.pdf
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.