RES-2012-158 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -158
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CERTIFYING FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 2008 -00340 AND
ADOPTING FINDINGS AND A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS, MITIGATION
MONITORING PROGRAM 85C, AND A WATER SUPPLY
ASSESSMENT (MIS2008- 00284) FOR AMENDMENT NO. 14
TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN PROJECT AND
REQUIRED AND RELATED DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS.
(DEV2010- 00044)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area includes 581 gross acres of
the 1,078 -acre Anaheim Resort, located generally west of Interstate 5, south of Vermont Avenue,
east of Walnut Street and north of Chapman Avenue; and,
WHEREAS, in 1989, the City of Anaheim initiated the Commercial Recreation
Area Enhancement Program and Transportation/Land Use Strategy Plan. The goal of the City's
efforts was to address the need for visual enhancement and infrastructure improvements in the
Commercial Recreation Area. Specifically, the Commercial Recreation Area Enhancement
Program's goal was to comprehensively address signage, landscaping, and other land use and
site development issues. The Transportation/Land Use Strategy's goal was to assess existing and
future transportation conditions and recommend improvements commensurate with land use
intensification projections over the next 20 years. In 1990, in connection with these studies, the
City Council adopted a revised C -R Zoning Ordinance and established Design Guidelines for the
area; and,
WHEREAS, the Commercial Recreation Area has been renamed The Anaheim
Resort and encompasses approximately 1,078 acres designated on the Anaheim General Plan
Land Use Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses; and,
WHEREAS, in 1993, the Anaheim City Council ( "City Council ") approved The
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and EIR, a proposal for approximately 489.7 acres in The
Anaheim Resort to develop an international multi -day resort including a second theme park,
hotel rooms, internal transportation systems, public parking facilities, administrative offices and
ongoing modification of the existing Disneyland theme park. In 1994, the City Council
subsequently approved the Hotel Circle Specific Plan to provide for the development of up to
969 hotel rooms on approximately 6.8 acres in the Anaheim Resort; and,
WHEREAS, in order to provide a long range comprehensive plan for future
development for the remaining properties in The Anaheim Resort and to further implement the
goals of the above -noted studies, City staff began work in 1991 on the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan and Master Environmental Impact Report ( "MEIR No. 313 "); and,
WHEREAS, on September 20, 1994, the City Council adopted the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan to provide a long -range comprehensive plan for future development of
approximately 549.5 acres surrounding The Disneyland Resort and Hotel Circle. The Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan includes zoning and development standards, design guidelines, a streetscape
program, and a public facilities plan, intended to maximize the area's potential, guide future
development, and ensure a balance between growth and infrastructure. The Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan permits the development of hotel, convention, retail, and other visitor - serving uses
as well as the infrastructure improvements that are needed to support future development; and,
WHEREAS, on September 27, 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance No.
5453, codifying the Zoning and Development Standards for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
into the Anaheim Municipal Code and Ordinance No. 5454 rezoning properties into the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan (SP 92 -2) Zone. Conditions of approval were applied to these rezonings;
and,
WHEREAS, since the adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, proposed
modifications to the specific plan have included 13 amendments and 6 adjustments, which have
expanded the total acreage of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area to 581.3 acres; and,
WHEREAS, in conjunction with the approval of the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan, the City Council also adopted The Anaheim Resort Identity and Public Realm Landscape
Programs. The Anaheim Resort Identity Program contains specific recommendations for the
location and design of gateways, directional signs, banners, light fixtures, and street furniture for
The Anaheim Resort. This program has been amended once since its approval. The Anaheim
Resort Public Realm Landscape Program summarizes landscape concepts proposed for the
public streets within The Anaheim Resort and provides a general overview of the different
landscape treatments that will help create a unifying resort identity. This program has been
amended four times since its approval; and,
WHEREAS, in support of the adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and
The Anaheim Resort Identity and Public Realm Landscape Programs, City Council certified
MEIR No. 313. Since being certified in 1994, two validation reports have been prepared (1999
and 2004) to evaluate the continued relevance and accuracy of MEIR No. 313; and,
WHEREAS, in June 2008, the City Council approved a contract with BonTerra
Consulting to prepare Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008 -00340 ( "EIR No.
2008- 00340 ") to reevaluate all of the environmental changes that had occurred in and around the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area since its adoption in 1994. In August 2008, the City Council
authorized exclusive negotiations with Sonnenblick Del Rio Development relating to a
development project at the Anaheim Convention Center. In order to analyze the environmental
impacts of that development project, in October 2008, City Council approved an amendment to
the agreement with BonTerra Consulting to include that development project in the analysis for
EIR No. 2008 - 00340; and,
WHEREAS, the Proposed Project, identified as Amendment No. 14 to the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (Specific Plan Amendment No. 2010 - 00060), would allow the
maximum build -out of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to increase by up to 406,359 square
-2-
feet of convention center space; 180,000 square feet of commercial development; 900 hotel
rooms; and, 40,000 square feet of hotel meeting/ballroom space. The Proposed Project
necessitates the amendment of the following documents that govern and regulate development
within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area: Anaheim General Plan, Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan, Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Ordinance No. 5454, and The Anaheim
Resort Identity and Public Realm Landscape Programs. Accordingly, Amendment No. 14 to the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (Specific Plan Amendment No. 2010 - 00060) is proposed in
conjunction with General Plan Amendment No. 2010 - 00482, Zoning Code Amendment No.
2010 - 00093, Amendment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort Identity Program (Miscellaneous Case
No. 2010 - 00478), Amendment No. 5 to The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program
(Miscellaneous Case No. 2010 - 00479), Amendment to Ordinance No. 5454 (Miscellaneous Case
No. 2010- 00484), and a Water Supply Assessment (Miscellaneous Case No. 2010- 00421)
(collectively referred to herein as the "Entitlements "); and,
WHEREAS, these Entitlements are intended to streamline development standards,
guidelines and requirements to reduce redundancy within and between these documents and
update the documents to reflect current conditions within The Anaheim Resort. The proposed
Entitlements do not change the types of land uses permitted within the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan area or significantly modify the associated development standards; and,
WHEREAS, the City is the "lead agency ", as defined in the California
Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ( "CEQA "), and the State of California
Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ( "CEQA
Guidelines "), for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed
Project, including the Entitlements; and,
WHEREAS, a Notice of Preparation ( "NOP ") for Draft EIR No. 2008 -00340 and
the Proposed Project's Initial Study were distributed to the public on February 11, 2009. The
public review period for the Initial Study ended on March 13, 2009. The City held a public
scoping meeting on February 25, 2009 to provide members of the public with an opportunity to
learn about the Proposed Project, ask questions and provide comments about the scope and
content of the information to be addressed in Draft EIR No. 2008 - 00340; and,
WHEREAS, Draft EIR No. 2008 -00340 was made available for a 45 -day public
review period from September 14, 2012 through October 29, 2012. The Notice of Availability
( "NOA "), which also included noticing for a public hearing before the Planning Commission of
the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission ") and a tentative date for a
subsequent public hearing before the City Council, was sent to a list of interested persons,
agencies and organizations, as well as property owners in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area
and within a 300 -foot radius of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area. The Notice of
Completion ( "NOC ") was sent to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento for distribution to
public agencies. The NOA was posted at the Orange County Clerk- Recorder's office on
September 14, 2012. Copies of Draft EIR No. 2008 -00340 were made available for public
review at the City of Anaheim Planning Department and at the Anaheim Central Library. Draft
EIR No. 2008 -00340 was also made available for download via the City's website; and,
-3-
WHEREAS, in accordance with Water Code Section 10910, Draft EIR No. 2008-
00340 includes a Water Supply Assessment, dated November 2009, supplemented with a Water
Facilities Assessment, dated November 4, 2009, a Water Demand and Regional Supply Update
Memo, dated November 29, 2010, a memo dated July 21, 2011, that documents the consistency
of the conclusions regarding water supply reliability presented in the aforementioned documents,
and Anaheim's 2010 Urban Water Management Plan adopted by the City Council in June 2011
(collectively referred to herein as the "Water Supply Analysis "); and,
WHEREAS, on November 5, 2012, the Planning Commission did hold a public
hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in
accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and
consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Draft EIR No. 2008-
00340 and for and against the Proposed Project, including the Entitlements, and to investigate
and make findings in connection therewith; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the Planning Commission did receive
evidence and reports, including all written and verbal comments received during the 45 -day
public review period, concerning the contents and sufficiency of Draft EIR No. 2008 -00340 and
did adopt its Resolution No. PC2012 -080 containing a report of its findings, a summary of the
evidence presented at said hearing, and recommending that the City Council (a) certify Final EIR
No. 2008 - 00340, (b) approve and adopt the Water Supply Analysis, (c) determine that Final EIR
No. 2008 -00340 fully complies with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, and is adequate to serve
as the environmental documentation for the Proposed Project, and (d) adopt Findings and a
Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program 85C for the
Proposed Project, including the Entitlements; and,
WHEREAS, the City has evaluated the comments received from public agencies
and persons who reviewed Draft EIR No. 2008 -00340 and has prepared responses to the
comments received during the public review period; and,
WHEREAS, in conformance with the requirements of CEQA and the CEQA
Guidelines, the City has prepared, or caused to be prepared, (a) Findings and a Statement of
Overriding Considerations relating to Draft EIR No. 2008 - 00340, which is attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference as though set forth in full, and (b) Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 85C, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by
this reference as though set forth in full; and,
WHEREAS, in conformance with Sections 15132 and 15362(b) of the CEQA
Guidelines, Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008 -00340 ( "Final EIR No.
2008 - 00340 ") consists of Draft EIR No. 2008 -00340 (including the Water Supply Analysis);
comments and recommendations received on Draft SEIR No. 2008 -00340 (either verbatim or in
summary); a list of persons, organizations and public agencies that submitted comments on Draft
EIR No. 2008 - 00340; the responses of the City, as lead agency, to significant points raised in the
review and consultation process; and,
-4-
WHEREAS, upon receipt of said Resolution No. PC2012 -080, summary of
evidence, report of findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council
did fix the 18th day of December, 2012, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic
Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project, including the Entitlements, and
for the purpose of considering Final EIR No. 2008 - 00340, and did give notice thereof in the
manner and as provided by law; and,
WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony
and arguments (if any) of all persons desiring to be heard, the City Council considered all factors
relating to the Proposed Project, including potential environmental impacts addressed in Final
EIR No. 2008 - 00340, the recommendations of the Planning Commission, the Findings and
Statement of Overriding Considerations, and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C; and,
WHEREAS, to the extent authorized by law, the City desires and intends to use
Final EIR No. 2008 -00340 as the environmental documentation required by CEQA and the
CEQA Guidelines for the Proposed Project, including the Entitlements; and,
WHEREAS, this City Council has reviewed the Water Supply Analysis for the
Proposed Project and finds and determines that there will be a sufficient water supply, now and
into the future, for the Proposed Project.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of
Anaheim as follows:
1. Final EIR No. 2008 -00340 prepared for the Proposed Project, which consists of
(a) Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (Specific Plan Amendment No.
2010 - 00060), (b) an amendment to the Anaheim General Plan (General Plan Amendment No.
2010 - 00482), (c) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2010- 00093, (d) Amendment to Ordinance No.
5454 (Miscellaneous Case No. 2010 - 00484), (e) Amendment No. 2 to the Anaheim Resort
Identity Program (Miscellaneous Case No. 2010 - 00478), (f) Amendment No. 5 to The Anaheim
Resort Public Realm Landscape Program (Miscellaneous Case No. 2010- 00479), and (g) a Water
Supply Assessment (Miscellaneous Case No. 2010- 00421), has been completed in compliance
with the requirements of CEQA and all applicable CEQA Guidelines; and
2. The City Council has carefully reviewed and considered the information
contained in Final EIR No. 2008 -00340 prior to acting upon the Proposed Project, including the
Entitlements; and
3. Final EIR No. 2008 -00340 reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the
City Council and the City of Anaheim; and
4. Based on the information contained in Final EIR No. 2008 - 00340, the City
Council finds that Final EIR No. 2008 -00340 provides an adequate assessment of the potentially
significant environmental impacts of the Proposed Project and required and related discretionary
actions.
BE IF FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby approves and adopts
the Water Supply Analysis.
-5-
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the Findings
and the Statement of Overriding Considerations, which is attached hereto as Exhibit A, which
documents and supports the conclusion that even with the implementation of all feasible
mitigation measures recommended in Final EIR No. 2008 - 00340, it is infeasible to reduce
certain impacts of the Proposed Project to a level of insignificance, and which further sets forth
the overriding benefits of the Proposed Project, which outweigh the unavoidable environmental
impacts of the Proposed Project. Accordingly, the City Council finds and determines that the
Proposed Project's benefits outweigh the adverse impacts.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council hereby adopts the
Mitigation Monitoring Program 85C, which is attached hereto as Exhibit B, as the mitigation -
monitoring program for the Proposed Project, including the Entitlements; and
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, based on all of the foregoing, the City Council
hereby certifies Final EIR No. 2008 - 00340.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council
of the City of Anaheim this 1 8th day of December , 2012, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Tait, Council Members Brandman, Eastman, Kring and Murray
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
CITY OF ANAHEIM
MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
A
��1i_•
CITY CLERK OF T CITY • ANAHEIM
92738
-6-
EXHIBIT "A"
FINDINGS AND THE STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
[Behind this sheet.]
FINDINGS AND STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS FOR
AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 340,
ANAHEIM, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA
STATE CLEARINGHOUSE NO. 91091062
DEV2010 -00044
1. INTRODUCTION
The California Environmental Quality Act, Public Resources Code Section 21081, and the CEQA
Guidelines, 14 California Code of Regulations, Section 15091 (collectively, CEQA) require that a
public agency consider the environmental impacts of a project before a project is approved and make
specific findings. The CEQA Guidelines Section 15091 provides:
(a) No public agency shall approve or carry out a project for which an EIR has been
certified which identifies one or more significant environmental effects of the project
unless the public agency makes one or more written findings for each of those
significant effects, accompanied by a brief explanation of the rationale for each finding.
The possible findings are:
1. Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project
which avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified
in the EIR.
2. Such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of
another public agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have
been adopted by such other agency or can or should be adopted by such other
agency.
3. Specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations,
including provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make
infeasible the mitigation measures or project alternatives identified in the final EIR.
(b) The findings required by subdivision (a) shall be supported by substantial evidence in
the record.
(c) The finding in subdivision (a)(2) shall not be made if the agency making the finding has
concurrent jurisdiction with another agency to deal with identified feasible mitigation
measures or alternatives. The finding in subsection (a)(3) shall describe the specific
reasons for rejecting identified mitigation measures and project alternatives.
(d) When making the findings required in subdivision (a)(1), the agency shall also adopt a
program for reporting on or monitoring the changes which it has either required in the
project or made a condition of approval to avoid or substantially lessen significant
environmental effects. These measures must be fully enforceable through permit
conditions, agreements, or other measures.
1
(e) The public agency shall specify the location and custodian of the documents or other
materials which constitute the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is
based.
(f) A statement made pursuant to Section 15093 does not substitute for the findings
required by this section.
CEQA Guidelines Section 15093 further provides:
(a) CEQA requires the decision - making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic,
legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposed project against its
unavoidable environmental risks when determining whether to approve the project. If
the specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of a proposal
project outweigh the unavoidable adverse environmental effects, the adverse
environmental effects may be considered "acceptable."
(b) Where the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of
significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or
substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support
its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. This statement
of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record.
(c) If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be
included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of
determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to,
findings required pursuant to Section 15091.
Having received, reviewed and considered the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report
(Draft SEIR) and the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Final SEIR) for Amendment
No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, SCH No. 91091062 (collectively, the SEIR), as well as all
other information in the record of proceedings on this matter, the following Findings and Statement of
Overriding Considerations (SOC) are hereby adopted by the City of Anaheim (City) in its capacity as
the CEQA Lead Agency.
These Findings set forth the environmental basis for the discretionary actions to be undertaken by the
City for the development of the Project. These actions include the approval of the following:
• Amendment No.14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact Report
(SCH No. 91091062).
• Amendment No.14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project
These actions are collectively referred to herein as the Project.
A. Document Format
These Findings have been organized into the following sections:
(1) Section 1 provides an introduction to these Findings.
(2) Section 2 provides a summary of the Project, and overview of the discretionary actions
required for approval of the Project, and a statement of the Project's objectives.
2
(3) Section 3 provides a summary of the CEQA process for the Project, including the public
participation, and summarizes the documents and other evidence that comprise the
Record of Proceedings for the Proposed Project.
(4) Section 4 sets forth findings regarding significant or potentially significant
environmental impacts identified in the SEIR which the City has determined are either
not significant or can feasibly be mitigated to a less than significant level through the
imposition of Standard Requirements and/or Mitigation Measures. In order to ensure
compliance and implementation, all of these measures will be included in the Mitigation
Monitoring Program (MMP) for the Project and adopted as conditions of the Project by
the Lead Agency. Where potentially significant impacts can be reduced to less than
significant levels through adherence to Standard Requirements, and/or Mitigation
Measures, these findings specify how those impacts were reduced to an acceptable
level. Section 4 also includes findings regarding any significant or potentially
significant environmental impacts identified in the SEIR which will or which may result
from the Project and which the City has determined cannot feasibly be mitigated to a
less than significant level, and therefore remain a significant and unavoidable impact.
(5) Section 5 sets forth findings regarding alternatives to the Proposed Project.
(6) Section 6 consists of a Statement of Overriding Considerations which sets forth the
City's reasons for finding that specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other
benefits, including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of the Project
outweigh the Project's potential unavoidable environmental effects.
B. Custodian and Location of Records
The documents and other materials which constitute the administrative record for the City's
actions related to the Project are located at the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200
South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162, Anaheim, California 92805. The City of Anaheim is the
custodian of the Administrative Record for the Project.
3
2. PROJECT SUMMARY
A. Project Location
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) area encompasses 581.3 gross acres and is located
in the City of Anaheim, 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and 7 miles northwest of
Santa Ana, in Central Orange County. The ARSP area is located generally west of the Interstate
(I) 5 corridor, south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Street, and north of Chapman Avenue.
The Anaheim Convention Center is located within the ARSP area, south of Katella Avenue
between West Street and Hotel Way.
B. Project Description
The Proposed Project involves (1) the build out of the ARSP, as defined in Master
Environmental Impact Report No. 313 (MEIR 313) and subsequent amendments and
adjustments to date and (2) the expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center.
Development in Accordance with the ARSP
The ARSP area is divided into two Development Areas: Area 1 and Area 2. Development
Area 1 is also known as the Commercial- Recreation (C -R) District and encompasses
approximately 518.5 acres. Development Area 2 is also known as the Public Recreational (PR)
District and encompassed 62.8 acres. Existing, permitted, and proposed development in these
two areas is shown in Table 1 -1.
Table 1 -1
Existing, Permitted and Proposed Development
District t , retstitte4 Proposed Development
C -R District • 11,587 hotel rooms* • 32,500 hotel rooms • 32,500 hotel rooms
P -R District • 1,600 hotel rooms • 1,600 hotel rooms • 2,500 hotel rooms
• 1,712,004 sf convention • 1,712,004 sf convention • 2,118,363 sf convention
center center center
• 119,414 sf future traffic • 180,000 sf commercial
generating uses development
• 100,000 sf outdoor • 40,000 sf of additional
programmable space hotel meeting and
ballroom space
• 100,000 sf outdoor
programmable space
* Commercial uses are converted to hotel room equivalents on a ratio of 600 square feet of
commercial development = 1 hotel room
4
The ARSP permits up to 32,500 hotel rooms within the C -R District. There are 11,587 hotel
rooms or hotel room equivalents' that are currently developed within the ARSP area. For
impact analysis, commercial uses are converted to hotel room equivalents on a ratio of
600 square feet of commercial development to one hotel room. The Proposed Project does not
include any changes to allowable number of hotel rooms in the
C -R District.
The PR District includes the 1,712,004 square foot (sf) Anaheim Convention Center
(Convention Center) and the 1,600 -room Anaheim Hilton Hotel. In addition, 219,414 sf of
future traffic- generating development was environmentally cleared within the PR District
through the certification of MEIR 313. Of this development potential, 100,000 sf has been
allocated toward outdoor programmable space for the Anaheim Convention Center Grand Plaza
Project.
The Proposed Project includes a further expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center, with the
following components:
• 406,359 sf of additional convention center space (including exhibit halls, ballrooms,
flexible meeting space, office and meeting rooms, and an interior bridge /skyway) and
• 180,000 sf of commercial space (including, but not limited to, retail stores, spa facilities,
bars and nightclubs, and restaurants).
• 900 additional hotel rooms, and
• A maximum of 40,000 sf of additional hotel meeting and ballroom space.
C. Discretionary Actions
Implementation of the Project would require several actions by the City, including
• Amendment No.14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Final Environmental Impact
Report (SCH No. 91091062). The Project requires the certification of the environmental
document as having been prepared in compliance with the CEQA Statutes and the CEQA
Guidelines. By doing this, the City is certifying that the information from the Final SEIR
was considered in the final decisions on the Project.
• The Proposed Project requires a Water Quality Assessment (Case No.
MIS2010- 00421) and amendments to the following documents that govern and regulate
development within the ARSP area:
o Anaheim General Plan (Case No. GPA2010- 00482)
o Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (Case No. SPN2010- 00060)
o Title 18 (Zoning Code) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Case No.
ZCA2010- 00093)
A hotel room equivalent is a defined area of a specific land use type that has been determined to result in
environmental effects (such as traffic generation) that are roughly equivalent to a single hotel room. The use of hotel
room equivalents allow for the development of other allowed land uses in an area that the maximum allowable density is
defined in terms of hotel rooms.
5
o The Anaheim Resort Identity Program (Case No. MIS2010- 00478)
o The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program (Case No.
MIS2010- 00479)
o Ordinance No. 5454 Conditions of Approval (Case No. MIS2010- 00484)
In addition to the discretionary actions listed above, subsequent approvals by the City of
Anaheim may include:
• Subdivision Maps,
• Final Site Plans,
• Building Permits,
• Conditional Use Permits, and/or
• Other entitlement action(s) associated with future development proposals in the ARSP area.
The Final SEIR would also provide environmental information to responsible agencies, trustee
agencies, and other public agencies that may be required to grant approvals and permits or coordinate
with the City of Anaheim as a part of Project implementation. These agencies include, but are not
limited to, those listed below.
bistretioaary A ry cd
Air quality conditions in the South Coast Air Ba
South Coast Air Quality Management (SoCAB) are under the jurisdiction of the South Cc
District Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD),
regional agency that regulates air emissions through
the SoCAB.
The Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQC
Regional Water Quality Control Board administers the National Pollutant Discha
Elimination System (NPDES) storm water permitt
program.
Wastewater is collected by City of Anaheim collec
Orange County Sanitation District facilities and conveyed to trunk sewers owned
maintained by the Orange County Sanitation Dist
(OCSD).
Freeways and associated on- and off -ramps owned
maintained by Caltrans are anticipated to be impac
California Department of Transportation by the Proposed Project. Recommended improveme
(Caltrans, District 12) at the Orangewood Avenue and SR -57 Southboi
Ramps intersection would be within Caltrans right
way.
6
Agency Discretionary Approval Required
The Proposed Project results in cumulative impacts
three intersections that are either located within the C
of Orange or are shared intersections between Oral
and Anaheim including:
o State College Boulevard at Orangewood Avenue
o State College Boulevard at The City
City of Orange Drive /Chapman Avenue
o Orangewood Avenue at SR -57 Southbound
Ramps
The City of Orange would be responsible
implementation of recommended improvements at th
intersections.
D. Statement of Project Objectives
Section 15124(b) of the CEQA Guidelines requires a statement of objectives sought by the
Proposed Project to help the lead agency develop a reasonable range of alternatives to evaluate
in the SEIR and to aid the decision makers in preparing Findings and a Statement of
Overriding Considerations. The statement of objectives should include the underlying purpose
of the project. Compatibility with project objectives is one of the criteria used in selecting and
evaluating a reasonable range of project alternatives, so clear project objectives simplify the
selection process by providing a standard against which to measure project alternatives.
The City of Anaheim established development and community objectives relative to the Project
as proposed in MEIR 313. The objectives were intended to set the framework and criteria in
which the pattern of growth for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area was envisioned. The
following General Plan policies were identified in MEIR 313 as being "especially relevant to
development of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan". These policies continue to apply to the
currently Proposed Project:
• Maintain and encourage Anaheim's position as a nationally recognized tourist, convention,
and recreation center.
• Increase sales tax yields and further enhance the economic base of the community, thereby
lessening the tax burden on real property.
• Encourage the development of quality facilities which complement conventions, family
entertainment, and recreation within appropriate areas of the community.
• Maintain the integrity of the Commercial- Recreation (C -R) and Public Recreation (PR)
Districts by permitting only compatible land uses within these designated areas.
• Foster the growth of the City's economic potential by revitalizing The Anaheim Resort.
• Treat all landowners and users in The Anaheim Resort area fairly, while recognizing the
economic and social needs of the entire City.
• Ensure that development complements the City's investment in the Anaheim Convention
Center and other area resources and interests.
7
• Maintain and enhance existing recreation and convention- oriented land uses.
• Protect adjacent residential land uses by buffering them from land use impacts associated
with development of The Anaheim Resort.
• Maintain or enhance traffic and circulation in and around The Anaheim Resort.
• Provide convenient access to all hotel, restaurant, and retail opportunities in The Anaheim
Resort to enhance the areawide tourist experience.
• Protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from unnecessary intrusion by vehicles
traveling to and from The Anaheim Resort.
• Accommodate potential future regional transportation networks into the Plan.
• Provide for necessary public infrastructure and services to maximize the development
potential of The Anaheim Resort.
• Create a coherent, unique resort identity that reinforces the image of The Anaheim Resort
as a high - quality destination resort.
• Establish a high- quality pedestrian environment.
• Improve the aesthetic character of The Anaheim Resort by visually defining the boundaries
with appropriate landscape treatments.
8
3. ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND PUBLIC PARTICIPATION
The Final SEIR includes the Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (Draft SEIR) dated
September 2012, written comments on the Draft SEIR that were received during the
45 -day public review period, and written responses to those comments and clarifications /changes to the
SEIR. In conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, the City conducted an extensive
environmental review of Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan:
• The City conducted an Initial Study (IS) of the Proposed Project and determined that a
Supplemental EIR was required to evaluate the potentially significant environmental effects of the
Proposed Project and its related actions. The IS described the purpose of the Supplemental EIR
and the proposed development within the Convention Center. The City distributed the IS along
with a Notice of Preparation (NOP) of a SEIR to responsible and interested agencies, including
surrounding cities, and provided a notice of its availability to adjacent property owners and other
interested parties in order to solicit comments and inform the public of the Proposed Project. The
NOP /IS was distributed on February 11, 2009, for a 30 -day review period as required by CEQA.
• The City held one public scoping meeting on February 25, 2009, to provide the public with a
forum to identify any additional environmental issues to be evaluated in the SEIR which were not
previously identified in the IS. Attendees were provided an opportunity to identify verbally or in
writing the issues they felt should be addressed in this SEIR. The scoping meeting was attended
by two members of the public, one of whom noted that potential traffic impacts should be taken
into consideration.
• The City prepared a Draft SEIR, which was made available for a 45 -day public review period
(September 14, 2012 through October 29, 2012). The Notice of Availability (NOA), which
included the Notice of Planning Commission and City Council public hearings, was sent to a list
of interested persons, agencies and organizations, as well as surrounding property owners. The
Notice of Completion (NOC) was sent to the State Clearinghouse in Sacramento for distribution to
public agencies. The NOA was posted at the Orange County Clerk- Recorder's office on
September 14, 2012. Copies of the Draft SEIR were made available for public review at the City
of Anaheim Planning Department and at the Anaheim Central Library. The Draft SEIR was also
available for download via the City's website.
• The City prepared a Final EIR, which included the comments and Responses to Comments on the
Draft SEIR. The Final EIR/Response to Comments contained: comments on the Draft SEIR,
responses to those comments, clarifications /revisions to the Draft SEIR, and appended documents.
The Final EIR Responses to Comments was released on December 7, 2012. In compliance with
Section 15088(b) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (CEQA Guidelines), the City
has met its obligation to provide written Responses to Comments to public agencies at least 10
days prior to certifying an EIR.
• A Planning Commission public hearing was held on November 5, 2012.
• A City Council public hearing was held on December 18, 2012.
For purposes of CEQA and these Findings, the Record of Proceedings for the Proposed Project
consists of the following documents and other evidence, at a minimum:
• The City's General Plan, as amended, and all environmental documents relating thereto;
• NOP and all other public notices issued by the City in conjunction with the Proposed Project;
9
• The materials presented at the Scoping Meeting held during the 30 -day NOP period;
• The Final SEIR including the Draft SEIR and all appendices, the Responses to Comments
document, and all supporting materials referenced therein. All documents, studies, EIRs, or other
materials incorporated by reference in the Draft SEIR and Final SEIR. The reports and technical
memoranda included or referenced in the Response to Comments of the Final SEIR;
• All written comments submitted by agencies and members of the public during the 45 -day public
review comment period on the Draft SEIR and included in the Final SEIR Responses to
Comments document;
• Planning Commission public hearing on November 5, 2012.
• City Council public hearing on December 8, 2012
• All final City Staff Reports relating to the Draft SEIR, Final SEIR, and the Project;
• All other public reports, documents, studies, memoranda, maps or other planning documents
relating to the Project, the Draft SEIR, and the Final SEIR prepared by the City, consultants to the
City, and/or responsible or trustee agencies.
• The Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) adopted by the City for the Project; the resolutions
adopted by the City in connection with the Proposed Project, and all documents incorporated by
reference therein;
• These Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding Considerations adopted by the City for the
Project. Any documents expressly cited in these Findings of Fact and Statement of Overriding
Consideration; and
• Any other relevant materials required to be in the record of proceedings by Public Resources Code
Section 21167.6(e).
The documents and other material that constitute the record of proceedings on which these findings are
based are located at the City of Anaheim Planning Department. The custodian for these documents is
the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162, Anaheim,
California 92805. This information is provided in compliance with Public Resources Code Section
21081.6(a)(2) and 14 California Code Regulations Section 15091(e).
•
10
4. FINDINGS REGARDING ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Findings Concerning Impacts That Were Found To Be Not Significant
In evaluating the potential impacts associated with the Project, the Final SEIR identified potential
impacts that would not be significant. This section identifies those impacts that may occur with Project
implementation but were found to be below the threshold of significant. Findings are not required for
impacts found to be less than significant, and that therefore do not require mitigation.
Nevertheless, the following information is provided in order to summarize the basis for determinations
of non - significance for various potential impacts, as presented in the Draft SEIR. Although impacts
determined to be not significant do not themselves require mitigation, in some cases those mitigation
measures that have been required to address other impacts found to be potentially significant and in
need of mitigation will also further reduce the non - significant impacts. In these cases, the mitigation
measures are noted, although the impacts would be insignificant even without such measures.
Impacts Related To Aesthetics
Potential Impact. The Project would have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista. The Project
would substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings,
and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic roadway.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is No Impact and no mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: The ARSP area does not contain any designated scenic
resources, nor are any scenic vistas visible from the ARSP area. No impact related to scenic
vistas or scenic highways would occur. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in
MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
Impacts Related to Air Quality
Potential Finding. The Project would create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of
people.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Proposed Project would not allow odor - producing land uses
such as landfills, wastewater treatment plants, composting, agriculture, chemical plants, and
dairies. Odors associated with construction equipment and activities would not be unfamiliar or
necessarily objectionable and would be temporary and dissipate rapidly from the source with an
increase in distance. Odor impacts would be less than significant. MEIR 313 did not evaluate
impacts related to odors; therefore, a finding regarding the SEIR's consistency with MEIR 313
cannot be made.
11
Impacts Related to Biological Resources
Potential Finding. The Project would interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident
or migratory fish or wildlife species or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native
wildlife nursery sites.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: The ARSP area does not function as a migratory corridor or a
native wildlife nursery site; therefore, no impacts would occur. MEIR 313 did not evaluate
impacts related to migratory corridors or native wildlife nursery sites; therefore, a finding
regarding the SEIR's consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
Impacts Related to Cultural Resources
Potential Impact. The Project would disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of
formal cemeteries.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: There are no cemeteries or identified human remains, including
those interred outside of formal cemeteries, known to be located within the ARSP area.
Grading and construction activities associated with build out of the ARSP could impact
previously unknown human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries,
which would be considered significant. However, compliance with the Public Resources Code
Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 would reduce this
impact to a level considered less than significant. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to
disturbance of human remains; therefore, a finding regarding the SEIR's consistency with
MEIR 313 cannot be made.
Impacts Related to Geology and Soils
Potential Impact. The Project would result in substantial soil erosion.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: The ARSP area is located within an area of the City with
relatively flat topography and minimal potential for erosion impacts. The majority of the ARSP
is currently developed with urban uses with limited areas of bare ground. Future build out of
the ARSP would expose areas to erosion and loss of topsoil during demolition and/or
construction activities. However, all future development within the ARSP would be subject to
local and State codes and requirements for erosion control and grading. Compliance with the
12
State's Construction General Permit would ensure that this impact would be less than
significant. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313 for the original
ARSP.
Impacts Related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential Impact. The Project would conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for
the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: The regulations, plans, and polices adopted for the purpose of
reducing GHG emissions that are directly applicable to the proposed Specific Plan include the
Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and the Title
24 California Green Building Standards Code. Adherence to standard requirements would
ensure that the Proposed Project would comply with both of these regulations. MEIR 313 did
not evaluate impacts related to greenhouse gas emissions; therefore, a finding regarding the
SEIR' s consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
Impacts Related to Land Use and Planning
Potential Impact. The Project would physically divide an established community.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: Continued build out of the C -R District would eliminate non-
conforming uses, thereby enhancing the continuity of the ARSP area as a single, unified
community. The only communities which may be subject to redevelopment are the two mobile
home parks located southeast of the intersection of Katella Avenue and Haster Street. However,
compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 18.26.070, Conversion and
Reclassification from Mobilehome Park Overlay Zone, would result in impacts associated with
the conversion of the mobile home parks to other uses to be less than significant. Therefore,
impacts associated with the division of an established community would be less- than
significant. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313.
Potential Impact. The Project would conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation
of an agency with jurisdiction over the Project (including but not limited to the general plan, specific
plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating and
environmental effect.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
13
Facts in Support of Finding: The Proposed Project would be consistent with the respective
goals and policies of local and regional regulatory and planning documents. No significant land
use impacts would occur, and no mitigation is necessary. This conclusion is consistent with that
provided in MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
Impacts Related to Population and Housing
Potential Impact. The Project would induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly
(for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through the
extension of roads or other infrastructure).
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Proposed Project has the potential to increase population by
approximately 9,099 residents and result in a demand for 2,757 housing units within the City of
Anaheim. The increases related to population and housing would be well within City of
Anaheim projections as stated in Table 5.11 -5 of the Draft SEIR, which is incorporated by
reference herein, representing a less than significant impact. This conclusion is consistent with
the conclusion provided in MEIR 313.
Potential Impact. The Project would displace substantial numbers of existing houses, necessitating the
construction of replacement housing elsewhere. The Project would displace substantial numbers of
people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Proposed Project has the potential to
displace housing units and residents associated with two mobile home parks located southeast of
the intersection of Katella Avenue and Haster Street, the City's MEP overlay zone. However,
assuming compliance with State law and the requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code,
impacts would be less than significant. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to the
displacement of housing or people; therefore, a finding regarding the SEIR's consistency with
MEIR 313 cannot be made.
Impacts Related to Recreation
Potential Impact. The Project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, a need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for parks.
The Project would include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of
recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment.
14
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Proposed Project would indirectly
increase population by approximately 9,099 residents (8,264 associated with build out of the C-
R District and 835 associated with the convention center expansion within the PR District).
Because this increase would take place over the next 20 years and because the ARSP area is not
located within a designated Park Deficiency Area, impacts related to the construction or
expansion of recreational uses would be less than significant. Additionally, any residential
development project within the Residential Overlay Zone would be subject to Anaheim
Municipal Code, Chapter 17.34 Development Fees, which requires the provision of parkland
and/or the payment of fees, consistent with the Quimby Act, thereby ensuring that a significant
impact would not occur. The conclusion for recreational facilities impacts is consistent with
that provided in MEIR 313.
Potential Impact. The Project would increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or
other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be
accelerated.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: The increased visitation at any off -site park facilities because of
the increased population generated by the Proposed Project would not be large enough to cause
substantial physical deterioration, and no physical impacts to park and recreational facilities
would occur. The conclusion for recreation facilities impacts is consistent with that provided in
MEIR 313.
Impacts Related to Transportation and Traffic
Potential Impact. The Project would conflict with an applicable congestion management program,
including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards
established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: Orange County CMP guidelines state that development projects
must comply with CMP criteria. Since the CMP's LOS standard of E or better is less stringent
than the City of Anaheim's LOS standard of LOS D or better and Project impacts would be
mitigated to LOS D or better, compliance with the City of Anaheim's standard will generally
mean compliance with the Orange County CMP standard. The Proposed Project would not
conflict with the Orange County CMP. No mitigation measures are required.
15
Impacts Related to Water
Potential Impact. The Project would have sufficient water supplies available to serve the Project
(including large -scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and
described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form) from existing entitlements and
resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: Project water demand would be accommodated through existing
and projected supplies, according to the Proposed Project's Water Supply Assessment. MEIR
313 did not evaluate impacts related to water supply; therefore, a finding regarding the SEIR' s
consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
Impacts Related to Sewer
Potential Impact. The Project would exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable
Regional Water Quality Control Board.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: All wastewater generation would be subject to treatment
pursuant to OCSD's Wastewater Discharge Regulations, including the procurement of the
necessary permits by food service establishments that would be developed in the ARSP area.
No significant impacts would occur, and no additional mitigation would be required. The
conclusion for impacts related to wastewater treatment requirements is consistent with that
provided in MEIR 313.
Potential Impact. The Project would result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider
which serves or may serve the Project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the Project's projected
demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is Less Than Significant Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Proposed Project would increase sewage
flows by approximately 323,656 gpd in the PR District and 2.1 mgd in the C -R District. These
increases in sewage flow would be accommodated by available capacity at OCSD Treatment
Plant No. 1; impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, adherence to the standard
requirements would ensure payment of required fees. The conclusion for impacts related to
regional wastewater treatment facilities is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313.
16
Impacts Related to Other Public Utilities
Potential Impact. The Project would result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to natural gas.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is No Impact and no mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: No impact would occur related to provision of natural gas
service to future projects within the ARSP area. This conclusion is consistent with that
provided in MEIR 313.
Potential Impact. The Project would be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to
accommodate the Project's solid waste disposal needs. The Project would comply with Federal, State,
and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste.
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is No Impact and no mitigation is required.
Although mitigation is not required, mitigation measures have been identified to further reduce
the potential for impacts.
Facts in Support of Finding: Based on solid waste generation rates provided by CalRecycle,
the Proposed Project would generate an estimated 109,514 pounds of solid waste per day or
approximately 19,986 tons of solid waste annually. The Proposed Project could be
accommodated within the permitted capacity of the County's landfill capacity. In addition,
once the Alpha Olinda Landfill closes in 2021, capacity would exist for the Proposed Project in
the FBR Landfill. No impact would occur related to provision of solid waste service to future
projects within the ARSP area; however, implementation of the proposed mitigation would
further ensure that adequate solid waste services are provided and that solid waste generation
would be minimized. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313.
MM 5.19 - Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to final
building and zoning Inspection, the property owner /developer shall submit Project
plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the
plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as
administered by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange and City of
Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final building and zoning
inspection, implementation of said plan shall commence and shall remain in full
effect. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid
waste generation include, but are not limited to:
a. Detailing the location and design of on -site recycling facilities.
b. Providing on -site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling.
c. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for hazardous
material disposal.
d. Participating in the City of Anaheim's "Recycle Anaheim" program or
other substitute program as may be developed by the City.
In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989
(AB 939), the property owner /developer shall implement numerous solid waste
17
reduction programs, as required by the Public Works Department, including, but
not limited to:
a. Facilitating recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for
sorting and recycling bins.
b. Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing
adequate space and centralized locations for collection and storing.
c. Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing
adequate space for sorting and storing.
d. Providing trash compactors for non - recyclable materials whenever
feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips
required for collection.
e. Prohibiting curbside pick -up.
MM 5.19 - Ongoing during Project operation, the following practices shall be implemented,
as feasible, by the property owner /developer:
a. Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and packaging.
b. Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard.
c. Collection of office paper for recycling.
d. Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling.
e. Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges,
oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.
MM 5.19 - Prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall show that trash storage areas
shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the City of Anaheim
Department of Public Works, Operations Division. On an ongoing basis, trash
storage areas shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans
on file with said Department.
MM 5.19 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall
demonstrate that the plans include provisions for the installation of trash and
recycle receptacles near all benches and near high traffic areas such as plazas,
transit stops and retail and dining establishments.
MM 5.19 - Prior to issuance of each grading and building permit, the Property
Owner/Developer shall submit to the Planning Director or Planning Services
Manager for approval a Construction Waste Management Plan that, at a
minimum, specifies that at least 75 percent of non - hazardous construction and
demolition debris shall be recycled or salvaged and identifies the materials to be
diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or co-
mingled.
Potential Impact. The Project would result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to telephone service.
18
Finding: The City hereby determines that there is No Impact and no mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: Facilities needed to connect the Proposed Project to the existing
telephone system may include new conduit, fiber and copper facilities. These improvements
would be implemented in accordance with applicable State and local regulations. No impact
would occur related to provision of telephone service to future projects within the ARSP area.
This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313.
Potential Impact. The Project would result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to television service /reception.
Finding: The ARSP area can be served by Time Warner Cable with the existing cable
resources available to the site. The City hereby determines that there is No Impact and no
mitigation is required.
Facts in Support of Finding: No impact would occur related to provision of television and
cable service to future projects within the ARSP area. This conclusion is consistent with that
provided in MEIR 313.
Findings Concerning Potentially Significant Impacts That Would Be Reduced to a Level
Considered Less Than Significant
The following discussion identifies the impacts in the Final SEIR that have been identified as being
potentially significant but reduced to a level considered less than significant with the implementation
of standard requirements and/or mitigation measures.
Impacts Related to Biological Resources
Potential Finding. The Project would have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through
habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in
local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: The ARSP area contains ornamental trees that may have the
potential to be used by nesting raptors. State regulations (California Fish and Game Code
§ §3503, 3503.5, and 3513) prohibit activities that "take, possess or destroy" any raptor nest or
egg. Therefore, if construction is initiated during the raptor nesting season, the Project has the
potential to impact nesting birds and raptors, which would result in a significant impact.
Implementation of MMs 5.3 -1 and 5.3 -2 would reduce these impacts to less than significant
levels. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to candidate, sensitive, or special status
species; therefore, a finding regarding the SEIR's consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
MM 5.3 -1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit,
whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a
19
qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning and Building Department 30
days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during
the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan
palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an active nest be identified,
restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction
activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer
active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a
300- to 500 -foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to
proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no
longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone.
MM 5.3 - Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit,
whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation
removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department,
verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to
avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be
disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees
which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities
to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate
minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist.
Impacts Related to Cultural Resources
Potential Finding. The Project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a
historical resource as defined in § 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and/or identified on the Qualified
Historic Structure list of the Anaheim Colony Historic Preservation Plan
(July 20, 1999).
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: No designated or eligible historical resources, as defined in
Section 15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines, have been identified in ARSP. There are numerous
structures within the ARSP that are nearing the 45 -year threshold to be considered for historic
designation. Because this EIR does not evaluate any specific development applications, future
Project details and timing cannot be committed to at this time. To ensure that any potential
resources that have not been formally identified are lost, and since a number of structures are
nearing 45 years of age within the ARSP boundaries, implementation of MM 5.4 -3 would
reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. The conclusion for impacts to historical
resources is more significant than the conclusion provided in MEIR 313.
MM 5.4 - Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over
45 years old, property owners /developers shall submit to the Planning and
Building Department, Planning Services Division documentation to verify the
presence /absence of historic resources. On properties where resources are
identified, such documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan,
20
including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan,
based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.
Potential Finding. The Project would cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an
archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines. The project would directly or
indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: No archaeological or paleontological resources have been
identified within or near the ARSP and no known unique geologic features are located within
the ARSP. However, grading and construction activities associated with build out of the ARSP
could impact unknown archeological and/or paleontological resources, which would be
considered significant. This impact would be mitigated to a level considered less than
significant with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures. This conclusion is
consistent with that provided in MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
MM 5.4 - Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure
that the following actions are implemented:
a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre - grading conference in order
to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to
permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if
potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered
and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall
determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property
owner /developer for exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be
donated to an appropriate educational or research institution.
c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction
of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading
operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall
be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area.
d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall
be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the
archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be
submitted.
MM 5.4 - Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure
that the following actions are implemented:
a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre - grading conference in order
to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the
sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant
21
paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and
found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine
appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner /developer for
exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be
donated to an appropriate educational or research institution.
c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction
of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading
operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall
be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area.
MM 5.4 - Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over
45 years old, property owners /developers shall submit to the Planning and
Building Department, Planning Services Division documentation to verify the
presence /absence of historic resources. On properties where resources are
identified, such documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan,
including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan,
based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist.
Impacts Related to Geology And Soils
Potential Impact. The Project would expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse
effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving strong seismic ground shaking.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Seismic activity along nearby or more distant fault zones is
likely to cause ground shaking within the City limits and within the ARSP, thus exposing
people and structures to adverse effects related to seismic ground shaking. Therefore, the
Proposed Project would be exposed to seismic ground shaking. However, with implementation
of the proposed mitigation measures, conformance with Titles 15 and 17 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code and the 2007 California Building Code, and completion of subsequent design -
level studies to be prepared when detailed grading and building plans, impacts would be
reduced to a less than significant level. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in
MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
MM 5.5 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for
review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject
building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a
geotechnical engineer.
MM 5.5 - Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning and
22
Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval,
which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft
layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that
compressibility does not underlie the footing.
MM 5.5 -3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit plans to the Planning Department, Building Services Division for review
and approval showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for
earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards
•
in the California Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim.
MM 5.5 -4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection for a hotel /motel, the property
owner /developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for
review and approval by the Fire Department. The plan shall require posted
notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures and incorporate
ongoing earthquake training for hotel staff to the satisfaction of the Fire
Department.
MM 5.5 -5 Ongoing during grading activities, the property owner /developer shall
implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent
erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department, Building
Services Division.
MM 5.5 -6 Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, the property owner /developer
shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services
Division geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic
or geologic hazards and provide a note on plans that all grading operations will
be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the
applicable geotechnical investigation.
Potential Impact. The Project would be located on expansive soil, as described by Section 1802.3.2 of
the California Building Code (2007), creating substantial risks to life or property.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Expansive soils are known to exist within the ARSP area;
therefore, build out of the ARSP may result in a significant impact related to expansive soil.
Implementation of current codes and regulations, as identified in the Anaheim Municipal Code,
and implementation of the proposed mitigation would reduce impacts to less than significant
levels. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to expansive soils; therefore, a finding
regarding the SEIR' s consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
MM 5.5 -1 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for
review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject
building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a
geotechnical engineer.
23
MM 5.5 - Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning and
Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval,
which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft
layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that
compressibility does not underlie the footing.
MM 5.5 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit plans to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services
Division for review and approval showing that the proposed structure has been
analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent
seismic standards in the California Building Code adopted by the City of
Anaheim.
Impacts Related to Hazards and Hazardous Materials
Potential Impact. The Project would be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous
materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would create a
significant hazard to the public or the environment.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Proposed Project would have the potential to disturb lead -
based paint (LBP) and asbestos containing materials (ACM) depending on the age of existing
structures within the PR and C -R Districts. Given the presence of underground storage tanks
(USTs), including ones which have been identified as having leaked, the Proposed Project
would have the potential to disturb hazardous materials. With implementation of mitigation,
including compliance with the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law, potential
impacts related to hazardous material on or near the Project Site would be reduced to less than
significant levels. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313 for the original
ARSP.
MM 5.7 - Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first,
in areas of former service stations, in areas known or thought to have been
previously occupied by USTs, and in areas where tank removal has not been
verified prior to excavation or grading, the property owner /developer shall retain
the services of a qualified environmental professional to conduct an investigation
for known, or the presence of, cryptic tanks, using geophysical methods. Soil
sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required if soil sampling results
are not available, or indicate contamination is present above regulatory guidelines.
If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken in these
areas, and appropriate remediation measures developed, if necessary, before
demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas.
24
MM 5.7 - Prior to the removal of USTs, the property owner /developer shall obtain a permit
from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department for the removal
of such tanks. During the removal of USTs, a representative from the
Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department shall be onsite to direct
soil sampling.
MM 5.7 - Ongoing during remediation all remediation activities of surface or subsurface
contamination not related to USTs, conducted on behalf of the property
owner /developer, shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Care Agency
(OCHCA). Information on subsurface contamination from USTs shall be
provided to the Public Utilities Department, Environmental Services Division.
MM 5.7 - Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first
the property owner /developer shall submit a plan for review and approval by the
Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if previously
unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material or waste, is discovered
onsite.
MM 5.7 - Prior to issuance of the first grading plan or demolition permit, whichever occurs
first for future developments within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area
affecting any property on a published list of leaking underground storage tanks
(LUST) that has not been officially closed or resolved, a qualified environmental
professional, retained by the property owner /developer, shall attempt to contact
the current and/or known former property/business owners to obtain information
regarding the status of USTs and/or tank closures at these sites. If warranted,
subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken by a qualified
environmental professional, and results of these analyses shall be submitted to the
Fire Department and the Environmental Services Division of the Public Utilities
Department for review and approval. Appropriate remediation measures will be
developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in
these areas.
MM 5.7 - Ongoing during Project demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous
waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction,
the property owner /developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste
and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by
the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety
Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), and according to the requirements of the
California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22.
MM 5.7 - Prior to issuance of any discretionary permit for a current or former hazardous
waste disposal site or solid waste disposal site, the Project property
owner /developer shall submit a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment to the
City. If possible hazardous materials are identified during the site assessments,
the appropriate response /remedial measures will be implemented in accordance
with the requirements of the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA)
and/or the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB), as appropriate.
25
Impacts Related to Hydrology And Water Quality
Potential Impact. The Proposed Project would violate any water quality standards or waste discharge
requirements. The Proposed Project would otherwise substantially degrade water quality. The
Proposed Project would substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from areas of
material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing),
waste handling, hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other
outdoor work areas. The Proposed Project would substantially degrade water quality by discharge
which affects the beneficial uses (i.e., swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or downstream waters.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Short-term storm water runoff from individual construction sites
could contain pollutants such as soils and sediments that are released during grading and
excavation activities and petroleum- related pollutants due to spills or leaks from heavy
equipment and machinery. Other common pollutants that can result from construction activities
include solid or liquid chemical spills; concrete and related cutting or curing residues; wastes
from paints, stains, sealants, solvents, detergents, glues, acids, lime, plaster, and cleaning
agents; and heavy metals from equipment.
Long -term potential pollutants that could be generated by maximum build out of the C -R
District and the expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center in the PR District could include,
but are not limited to, bacteria/viruses, heavy metals, nutrients, pesticides, organic compounds,
sediments, trash and debris, oxygen - demanding substances, and oil and grease. Specific
pollutants would depend on the type of land use and the site improvements proposed by
individual projects; basically, residential developments, industrial or commercial
developments, automotive repair shops, restaurants, hillside developments, parking lots, and
streets would have the potential to generate different storm water pollutants.
Implementation of the Proposed Project would result in short-term construction- related and
long -term operational water quality impacts. These impacts would be mitigated to a level
considered less than significant with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures and
compliance with the standard requirements. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in
MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner /developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff
Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public Works
Department, Development Services Division and Orange County (OC) Public
Works /OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
following items:
26
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting
hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the
100 -year storm; and,
b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of
project - generated drainage and runoff.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one (1) acre
of soil, the property owner /developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES
Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from
the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be
submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division.
MM 5.8 - Ongoing during Project operations, the property owner /developer shall provide for
the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim
on a monthly basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots.
The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and
flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited.
MM 5.8 - Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City certifying that
the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in
the approved landscaping and irrigation plans.
MM 5.8 - Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer shall
install piping on -site with Project water mains so that reclaimed water may be
used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner /developer shall provide
written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall
be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Potential Impact. The Proposed Project would substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere
substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a
lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells
would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits
have been granted).
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Groundwater elevations in the planning area are approximately
140 to 150 feet below the ground surface. Excavation and grading activities for future
development according to the ARSP are not expected to be deep enough (up to 140 feet) to
affect the underlying groundwater resources. However, build out within the C -R and PR
Districts would result in an increase in long -term demand for domestic water, landscape
irrigation, and maintenance activities. Implementation of the proposed mitigation would reduce
demand for groundwater resources, and potential impacts would be mitigated to less than
27
significant levels. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313 for the original
ARSP.
MM 5.8 -3 Ongoing during Project operations, the property owner /developer shall provide for
the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim
on a monthly basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots.
The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and
flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited.
MM 5.8 -4 Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City certifying that
the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in
the approved landscaping and irrigation plans.
MM 5.8 -5 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer shall
install piping on -site with Project water mains so that reclaimed water may be
used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available.
MM 5.8 -6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner /developer shall provide
written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall
be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
MM 5.15 -1 Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to fmal
building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on -going basis during
Project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public
Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water
conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be
shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner /developer, to the
extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Use of low -flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems.
b. Use of waterway recirculation systems.
c. Low -flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and
urinals.
d. Use of self - closing valves on drinking valves.
e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic
systems which use moisture sensors.
f. Use of low -flow shower heads in hotels.
g. Water efficient ice - machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other
water -using appliances.
h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are
lowest.
i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water
conservation.
28
j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible.
MM 5.15 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the Project
will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval
of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire
Department.
MM 5.15 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a landscape and irrigation plan which shall be prepared and certified by a
licensed landscape architect. The irrigation plan shall specify methods for
monitoring the irrigation system. The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do
not exceed the infiltration of local soils, that the application of fertilizers and
pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies, and that surface runoff
and overwatering is minimized. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall
include water - conserving features such as low flow irrigation heads, automatic
irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture
sensors, and other water - conserving equipment. The landscaping and irrigation
plans shall indicate that separate irrigation lines for recycled water shall be
constructed and recycled water will be used when it becomes available. All
irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with
recycled water.
MM 5.15 - Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever
occurs first, the property owner /developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the
Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall
be amended to include:
a. Construction of a new well with a minimum 1,500 GPM capacity to serve
The Anaheim Resort Area (tentative location near Ponderosa Park and
Orangewood Avenue); and
b. Construction of a new 16 -inch water main along Harbor Boulevard from
Orangewood to Chapman Avenue.
MM 5.15 - Ongoing, the City shall continue to collaborate with the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California (MWD), its member agencies, and the Orange
County Water District (OCWD) to ensure that available water supplies meet
anticipated demand. If it is forecasted that water demand exceeds available
supplies, staff shall recommend to City Council to trigger application of the Water
Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, § 10.18), as prescribed, to
require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by Sections 10.18.070
through 10.18.090, as appropriate.
Potential Impact. The Proposed Project would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which
would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off -site.
29
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Proposed Project would result in
site - specific changes to drainage patterns on development sites through changes to the local
hydrology and increases in impervious surface area, but would not adversely impact regional
hydrology or drainage flows in the surrounding area. Potential increases in impervious surfaces
could increase runoff rates and volumes, while reducing potential for soil erosion.
Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures and compliance with the standard
requirements would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. This conclusion is consistent
with that provided in MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner /developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff
Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public Works
Department, Development Services Division and Orange County (OC) Public
Works /OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
following items:
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting
hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and
including the 100 -year storm; and,
b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control
of Project - generated drainage and runoff.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one (1) acre
of soil, the property owner /developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES
Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from
the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be
submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division.
MM 5.8 - Ongoing during Project operations, the property owner /developer shall provide for
the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim
on a monthly basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots.
The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and
flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited.
MM 5.8 - Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City certifying that
the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in
the approved landscaping and irrigation plans.
MM 5.8 - Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer shall
install piping on -site with Project water mains so that reclaimed water may be
used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available.
30
MM 5.8 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner /developer shall provide
written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall be
designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Potential Impact. The Proposed Project would substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the
site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase
the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off -site. The
Proposed Project would create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing
or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of pollutant runoff.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Proposed Project may increase runoff
volumes and rates to exacerbate existing storm drain deficiencies in the ARSP, potentially
leading to localized street flooding. Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures and
compliance with the standard requirements would reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the
property owner /developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff
Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public Works
Department, Development Services Division and Orange County (OC) Public
Works /OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
following items:
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting
hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and
including the 100 -year storm; and,
b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control
of Project - generated drainage and runoff.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one (1) acre
of soil, the property owner /developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES
Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from
the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be
submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division.
MM 5.8 - Ongoing during Project operations, the property owner /developer shall provide for
the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim
on a monthly basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots.
The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and
flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited.
MM 5.8 Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City certifying that
the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in
the approved landscaping and irrigation plans.
31
MM 5.8 - Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer shall
install piping on -site with Project water mains so that reclaimed water may be
used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available.
MM 5.8 - Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner /developer shall provide
written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall be
designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Impacts Related to Noise
Potential Impact. The Project would expose people to or generate (long -term) noise levels in excess
of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies. The Project would result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the
Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Draft
SEIR.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Proposed Project would allow an increase in development
intensity at the Public Recreational (PR) and Commercial- Recreation (C -R) Districts, but
specific locations, site plans, and construction details have not been developed. Construction
would be localized and would occur intermittently for varying periods of time. Development
associated with the Proposed Project would create land use compatibility issues related to noise
and would expose receptors to noise levels in excess of established standards, thereby resulting
in significant impacts. Adherence to the standard requirements and implementation of the
proposed mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. The
conclusion related to increased noise levels is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313.
MM 5.10 - Prior to approval of each fmal site plan, the property owner /developer shall submit
a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the
Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and
defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if
warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level
Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the
final location of such buildings and noise - sensitive uses inside and surrounding
the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property
owner /developer prior to final building and zoning inspections.
MM 5.10 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, for structures that are adjacent to noise -
sensitive areas such as residences, the property owner /developer shall ensure that
all mechanical ventilation units are shown on plans and installed in compliance
with Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.
MM 5.10 - Prior to issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property
owner /developer shall ensure that noise from parking structures adjacent to
32
residential areas will be reduced by the provision of convenient access to parking
facilities, sound attenuation devices (louvers and walls), the use of textured deck
surfaces to reduce tire squalling, and tiering a parking facility to provide greater
distance to the receptor.
MM 5.10 -7 Ongoing during construction and Project operation, sweeping operations in the
parking facilities and private on -site roadways shall be performed utilizing
sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than
60 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line.
Potential Impact. The Project would expose people to or generate excessive ground -borne vibration or
ground -borne noise levels.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground
vibration, depending on the equipment and methods used, distance to the affected structures,
and soil type. Pile driving and rock blasting, which are less common activities, have the
potential to generate higher vibration levels. Construction activities related to future development
projects within the ARSP area have the potential to generate vibration and ground -borne vibration
impacts. Implementation of the proposed mitigation would reduce these potential impacts to less
than significant levels. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to vibration; therefore, a finding
regarding the SEIR's consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
MM 5.10 -1 Ongoing during construction, the property owner /developer shall ensure that all
internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with
properly maintained mufflers.
MM 5.10 -2 Prior to approval of each final site plan, the property owner /developer shall submit
a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the
Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and
defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if
warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level
Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the
final location of such buildings and noise - sensitive uses inside and surrounding
the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property
owner /developer prior to final building and zoning inspections.
MM 5.10 -3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, for structures that are adjacent to noise -
sensitive areas such as residences, the property owner /developer shall ensure that
all mechanical ventilation units are shown on plans and installed in compliance
with Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.
MM 5.10 -4 Prior to issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property
owner /developer shall ensure that noise from parking structures adjacent to
residential areas will be reduced by the provision of convenient access to parking
facilities, sound attenuation devices (louvers and walls), the use of textured deck
33
surfaces to reduce tire squalling, and tiering a parking facility to provide greater
distance to the receptor.
MM 5.10 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on building
plans indicating that during construction, the property owner /developer shall
install and maintain specially designed construction barriers at the Project
perimeter areas. The construction sound barriers shall be a minimum height of 8
feet with a minimum surface weight of 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum
Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. The structure shall be a continuous
barrier. Gates and other entry doors shall be constructed with suitable mullions,
astragals, seals, or other design techniques to minimize sound leakage when in the
closed position. Access doors should be self closing where feasible. Vision ports
are permissible providing they are filled with an acceptable solid vision product.
MM 5.10 - Ongoing during construction and Project operation, pressure washing operations
for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to graffiti or other aesthetical
considerations shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 AM
and 8:00 PM.
MM 5.10 - Ongoing during construction and Project operation, sweeping operations in the
parking facilities and private on -site roadways shall be performed utilizing
sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than
60 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line.
MM 5.10 - Ongoing during construction, property owners /developers shall pay for all
reasonable costs associated with noise monitoring which shall include monitoring
conducted by a certified acoustical engineer under the direction of the Planning
and Building Department four times a year on a random basis to ensure that
outdoor construction- related sound levels at any point on the exterior Project
boundary property line do not exceed 60 dBA between the hours of 7:00 PM and
7:00 AM of the following day where outside construction is occurring. If a
complaint is received by the City, additional noise monitoring shall be conducted
at the discretion of the City. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is
being exceeded, construction activities will be modified immediately to bring the
sound level below the 60 dBA requirement, with additional follow -up monitoring
conducted to confirm compliance.
MM 5.10 -9 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
present plans and calculations to the Planning Department, Building Division to
demonstrate that noise levels would be less than 65 dBA CNEL for outdoor use
areas (including dining patios, pools, playgrounds, or outdoor gathering areas).
This requirement can be accomplished through shielding areas behind buildings or
the construction of a noise barrier.
MM 5.10 - 10 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building
Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation
34
equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on -site noise
sources are designed to meet the City's 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at
the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing
ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more
restrictive.
MM 5.10 - 11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on plans
indicating that there shall be no operation of large bulldozers or vibratory rollers
within 25 feet of any existing residence.
MM 5.10 - 12 Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated
during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and
submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to assess
and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities.
Impacts Related to Public Services
Potential Impact. The Project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for police
protection.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: The ARSP at build out would generate, on average, in excess of
20,036 calls for service per year. The calls generated by this intensification would require an
increase in staffing of 60 officers and 31.5 full -time and 14.4 part-time civilian support
personnel to maintain current levels of service. A staffing increase of that - size would
necessitate the acquisition of a minimum of 23,884 square feet of additional facility space, 53.4
new vehicles, and a minimum of $306,480 in assigned equipment. Therefore, build out of the
ARSP would create additional demand for police services; implementation of the following
mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less than significant.
MM 5.12 - Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit,
the property owner /developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for
review and approval for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security
provisions during both the construction and operative phases for the purpose of
incorporating safety measures in the Project design including the concept of crime
prevention through environmental design (e.g., building design, circulation, site
planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas).
MM 5.12 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property
owner /developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and
approval indicating the provision of closed circuit television monitoring and
35
recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police
Department. Said measures shall be implemented prior to final building and
zoning inspections.
MM 5.12 - Ongoing during Project operation, the property owner /developer shall provide
private security on the premises to maintain adequate security for the entire
Project subject to review and approval of the Police Department. The use of
security patrols and electronic security devices (i.e., video monitors) should be
considered to reduce the potential for criminal activity in the area.
MM 5.12 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Project design shall include parking
lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress
if determined to be necessary by the Police Department, and shall be subject to the
review and approval of the Police Department.
Potential Impact. The Project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for fire
protection.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Approximately 287 annual requests for fire and/or emergency
rescue services are anticipated with implementation of the Proposed Project. Therefore, build
out of the ARSP would create additional demand for fire and/or emergency rescue services;
payment of all applicable fire facilities fees and implementation of the following mitigation
measures would reduce impacts to less than significant.
MM 5.12 - Prior to commencement of structural framing on each parcel or lot, onsite fire
hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner /developer as
required and approved by the Fire Department.
MM 5.12 - Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit an emergency fire access plan to the Fire Department for review and
approval to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department
service requirements.
MM 5.12 - Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to the final
building and zoning inspection, plans shall indicate that all buildings, exclusive of
parking structures, shall have sprinklers installed by the property owner /developer
in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be
installed prior to each final building and zoning inspection.
MM 5.12 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans shall be submitted to ensure that
development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department
Standards, including:
36
a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of
access roads.
b. Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access
shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 75,000
pounds.
c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required
at all entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be
necessary by the Fire Department.
d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area
and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property
owner /developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants
shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a
maximum of 400 feet apart.
e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water
system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to
1,500 gpm.
MM 5.12 - Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner /developer shall
enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim to
pay or cause to be paid their fair share of the funding to accommodate the
following, which will serve the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area:
a. One additional fire truck company.
b. One additional paramedic company.
c. Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire
units, additional manpower, equipment and facilities.
d. A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire
Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability.
e. A medical triage vehicle /trailer, equipped with sufficient trauma dressings,
medical supplies, stretchers, etc., to handle 1,000 injured persons, and an
appropriate storage facility.
The determination of the allocable share of costs attributable to the property
owner /developer shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such
equipment/facilities among property owners /developers in the Hotel Circle
Specific Plan Area, the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area and the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan Area or the otherwise defined service area, as applicable,
depending on the area served. (Note: To implement this mitigation measure, the
City has adopted the Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic Services Impact Fee
Program. Compliance with this Program by the property owner /developer (per
Ordinance No. 5496 and Resolution No. 95R -73 dated May 16, 1995) shall satisfy
the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative
financing arrangements.)
37
MM 5.12 - 10 Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as
approved by the Fire Department.
MM 5.12 - 11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan to the Fire Department for review and
approval detailing accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant
location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The
property owner /developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to
the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow.
MM 5.12 - 12 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each
building permit, plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as
being in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code.
MM 5.12 - 13 Prior to the placement of building materials on a building site, an all- weather road
shall be provided from the roadway system to and on the construction site and for
fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire Department. Such routes shall be
paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide
adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to Fire
Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet the
requirements of Section 10.204 of the Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by the City
of Anaheim.
MM 5.12 - 14 Prior to approval of building plans, the property owner /developer shall provide
written evidence to the satisfaction of the Fire Department that all lockable
pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates shall be equipped with "knox box"
devices as required and approved by the Fire Department.
MM 5.12 - 15 Prior to approval of on -site water plans, unless each commercial building is
initially connected to separate fire services, an unsubordinated covenant
satisfactory to the City Attorney's Office shall be recorded prohibiting any
individual sale of buildings until separate fire services are installed in the
building(s) subject to the sale.
MM 5.12 - 16 Prior to approval of water improvement plans, the water supply system shall be
designed by the property owner /developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure
and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection services in accordance
with Fire Department requirements.
Potential Impact. The Project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for schools.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
38
Facts in Support of Finding: Approximately 1,188 school -aged students would be generated
as an indirect result of the Proposed Project, including 995 elementary students and 193 junior
and high school students. This increase in demand for school services and facilities would
evolve over the 25 year buildout period as the ARSP area is constructed and potential
employees decide to locate within the City limits. In addition, potential resort area employees
could live anywhere within the city and would have the potential to utilize any of the Districts'
schools. Implementation of the following mitigation measures would reduce impacts to less
than significant.
MM 5.12 - 17 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
provide proof of compliance with Government Code Section 53080 (Schools).
MM 5.12 - 18 Ongoing, the City will work cooperatively with school districts to identify
opportunities for new schools and school expansion.
Potential Impact. The Project would result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the
provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered
governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in
order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for library
services.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect as identified in the Draft
SEIR.
Facts in Support of Finding: A total increase of 9,099 additional residents could occur as a
result of the Proposed Project. Currently, one in three Anaheim residents has a library card and
uses the public library. This would add new borrowers to the Euclid/Central service areas. The
growth in population will increase licensing costs for electronic resources. Therefore,
additional funds to support increased demand for library services are required to maintain the
current level of community support. Implementation of the following mitigation measure would
reduce impacts to less than significant. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to libraries;
therefore, a finding regarding the SEIR's consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
MM 5.12 - 19 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner /developer shall
comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.385, Public Library
Facilities Services Areas — Payment of Fees Required.
Impacts Related to Water
Potential Impact. The Project would require or result in the construction of new water treatment
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
39
Facts in Support of Finding: Existing facilities serving the ARSP are insufficient to serve the
fully built out Commercial- Recreation (C -R) District and the expanded convention center in the
Public Recreational (PR) District. Project water demand associated with the Proposed Project
would exceed capacities of existing water facilities. Adherence to the proposed mitigation
measures would reduce impacts to less than significant. This conclusion is consistent with that
provided in MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
MM 5.15 - Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final
building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on -going basis during
Project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public
Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water
conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be
shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner /developer, to the
extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following:
a. Use of low -flow sprinlder heads in irrigation systems.
b. Use of waterway recirculation systems.
c. Low -flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and
urinals.
d. Use of self - closing valves on drinking valves.
e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic
systems which use moisture sensors.
f. Use of low -flow shower heads in hotels.
g. Water efficient ice - machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other
water -using appliances.
h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are
lowest.
i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water
conservation.
j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible.
MM 5.15 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the Project
will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval
of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire
Department.
MM 5.15 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, water pressure greater than 80 pounds
per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80 psi or less by means of pressure
reducing valves installed at the property owner /developer's service.
MM 5.15 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a landscape and irrigation plan which shall be prepared and certified by a
licensed landscape architect. The irrigation plan shall specify methods for
monitoring the irrigation system. The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do
40
not exceed the infiltration of local soils, that the application of fertilizers and
pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies, and that surface runoff
and overwatering is minimized. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall
include water - conserving features such as low flow irrigation heads, automatic
irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture
sensors, and other water - conserving equipment. The landscaping and irrigation
plans shall indicate that separate irrigation lines for recycled water shall be
constructed and recycled water will be used when it becomes available. All
irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with
recycled water.
MM 5.15 - Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan and building permits, plans shall
specifically show that the water meter and backflow equipment and any other
large water system equipment will be installed to the satisfaction of the Public
Utilities Department, Water Engineering Utility Division, aboveground and
behind the building setback line in a manner fully screened from all public streets
and alleys and in accordance with Ordinance No. 4156. Prior to the final building
and zoning inspections, the water meter and backflow equipment and any other
large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public
Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, in accordance with the Final
Site Plan and the building permit plans.
MM 5.15 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous
payment, the appropriate fees for Primary Mains, Secondary Mains and Fire
Protection Service shall be paid to the Public Utilities Department, Water
Engineering Division in accordance with Rule 15A, and Rule 20 of the Public
Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules and Regulations.
MM 5.15 - Prior to final building and zoning inspections, a separate water meter shall be
installed for landscape water on all projects where the landscape area exceeds
2,500 square feet in accordance with Ordinance No. 6160.
MM 5.15 - Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever
occurs first, the property owner /developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the
Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall
be amended to include:
a. Construction of a new well with a minimum 1,500 GPM capacity to serve
The Anaheim Resort Area (tentative location near Ponderosa Park and
Orangewood Avenue); and
b. Construction of a new 16 -inch water main along Harbor Boulevard from
Orangewood to Chapman Avenue.
MM 5.15 - Ongoing, the City shall continue to collaborate with the Metropolitan Water
District of Southern California (MWD), its member agencies, and the Orange
County Water District (OCWD) to ensure that available water supplies meet
anticipated demand. If it is forecasted that water demand exceeds available
41
supplies, staff shall recommend to City Council to trigger application of the Water
Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, § 10.18), as prescribed, to
require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by Sections 10.18.070
through 10.18.090, as appropriate.
Impacts Related to Sewer
Potential Impact. The Project would require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater
treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Build out of the ARSP would increase sewage flows in existing
sewer lines and trunks serving the area as part of Models 1, 13, 15, 16, 17, 20, 21, 22, 40, and
51 of the Combined Central Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers. Results of the
modeling indicate that several sewer lines would become deficient or that future development
under the amended ARSP would contribute to existing deficiencies in Models 1, 13, 15, 16, and
40. No deficiencies exist nor would deficiencies be created in sewer lines in Models 17, 20, 21,
22, and 51 due to the Proposed Project. Implementation of the following mitigation measures
would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. The conclusion for sewer
capacity impacts is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313.
MM 5.16 - Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner /developer shall participate in
the City's Master Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee)
Program to assist in mitigating existing and future sanitary sewer system
deficiencies as follows:
The property owner /developer shall submit a report for review and approval of the
City Engineer to assist in determining the following:
a. If the development/redevelopment (1) does not discharge into a sewer
system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that
discharge and/or (2) does not increase flows or change points of discharge,
then the property owner's /developer's responsibility shall be limited to
participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program.
b. If the development/redevelopment (1) discharges into a sewer system that
is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge
and/or (2) increases flows or changes points of discharge, then the
property owner /developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney of the impact prior
to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building
permit whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in
the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study. The property
owner /developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as
42
recommended by the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study, prior to
acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final
building and zoning inspections for the building/structure, whichever
comes first. Additionally, the property owner /developer shall participate in
the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, as determined by the City
Engineer, which may include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a
combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts for
the sanitary sewer system, the property owner /developer shall submit a
sanitary sewer system improvement phasing plan for the Project to the
City Engineer for review and approval which shall contain, at a minimum,
(1) a layout of the complete system, (2) all facility sizes, including support
calculations, (3) construction phasing, and (4) construction estimates. The
study shall determine the impact of the Project sewer flows for total build
out of the Project and identify local deficiencies for each Project
component (i.e., each hotel).
MM 5.8 - Prior to approval of building plans, the property owner /developer shall provide
written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall be
designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer.
Impacts Related to Electricity
Potential Impact. The Project would result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial
alterations related to electricity.
Finding: Changes or alterations have been required in, or incorporated into, the Project which
avoid or substantially lessen the significant environmental effect.
Facts in Support of Finding: Build out of the ARSP and expansion of the Convention Center
would result in increased demand for electricity of approximately 184,059,772 kilowatts per
hour (kWh) annually or an estimated 799,344 kWh on an average day. It is noted that the
Anaheim Public Utilities Department has installed and operates a 102 kilowatt photovoltaic
power generation system on the roof of the Anaheim Convention Center. This system generates
more than 141,000 kilowatt hours (kWh) of electricity annually. Therefore, the estimated net
increase in electrical demand associated with implementation of the ARSP is 69.1 Mega Volt
Amp (MVA). Compliance with the standard requirements and implementation of the proposed
mitigation measures would reduce anticipated demand through conservation efforts. It is
expected that the existing electrical distribution system and future planned improvements
would adequately accommodate the anticipated demand, thus resulting in a less than significant
impact with mitigation. The conclusion for impacts is consistent with that provided in MEIR
313.
MM 5.17 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /develop shall
consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Resource
Efficiency Business and Community Programs Division in order to review energy
efficient measures to incorporate into the Project design. Prior to the final
43
building and zoning inspection, the property owner developer shall implement
these energy efficient measures, which may include the following:
a. High - efficiency air- conditioning systems with EMS (computer) control
b. Variable air volume (VAV) distribution
c. Outside air (100 %) economizer cycle
d. Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads
e. Isolated HVAC zone control by floors /separable activity areas
f. Specification of premium - efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor
motors, air - handling units, and fan-coil units)
g. Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces
h. Use of compact fluorescent lamps
i. Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps
j. Use of light emitting diode (LED) or equivalent energy - efficient lighting
for outdoor lighting
k. Use of Energy Star® exit lighting or exit signage
1. Use of T -8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified
m. Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal- halide or high -
pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots
n. Consideration of thermal energy storage air - conditioning for spaces or
facilities that may require air- conditioning during summer, day -peak
periods.
o. For swimming pools and spas, incorporate solar heating, automatic covers,
and efficient pumps and motors, as feasible.
P. Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as:
a. New construction design review, in which the City cost - shares
engineering for up to $10,000 for design of energy efficient
buildings and systems
b. New Construction — cash incentives ($300 to $400 per kW
reduction in load) for efficiency that exceeds Title 24 requirements
44
c. Green Building Program — offers accelerated plan approval,
financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical
assistance.
MM 5.17 -2 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer shall
install an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution
System. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the
Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground
Systems. Electrical Service Fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical
Specifications for Underground Systems.
MM 5.17 -3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building
Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each
building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent.
MM 5.17 -4 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall
coordinate with the Public Utilities Department to incorporate feasible renewable
energy generation measures into the Project. These measures may include but not
be limited to use of solar and small wind turbine sources on new and existing
facilities and the use of solar powered lighting in parking areas.
45
Findings on Unavoidable Significant Impacts
The purpose of this section is to present the findings and facts in the support of findings relative to
those Project impacts that cannot be reduced to a level considered less than significant with the
implementation of standard requirements and/or mitigation measures.
Impacts Related to Aesthetics
Potential Impact. The Project would substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of
the site and its surroundings.
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Proposed Project would alter the existing visual condition of
the ARSP area through introduction of new, higher density development within the ARSP area.
However, since new development would be required to conform to the ARSP, these changes
would create a more visually cohesive and appealing environment and impacts would be less
than significant. This conclusion is less than the impacts identified in MEIR 313 for the original
ARSP. Shade and shadow impacts associated with the specific development proposed for the
PR District would be less than significant. The Proposed Project does not propose any specific
development projects within the C -R District; therefore, specific impacts associated with
individual proposals cannot be determined at this time. However, development standards within
the C R District are not proposed to change from what is currently allowed by the ARSP.
Despite compliance with the design guidelines set forth in the ARSP and proposed mitigation
that would require each property owner /developer to submit a shade and shadow analysis to the
Planning Department for review and approval, prior to final site plan approval, demonstrating
that the proposed structure(s) would avoid creating significant shade and shadow impacts on
adjacent land uses to the maximum extent feasible, build out of the C -R District could result in
potential shade and shadow impacts on properties immediately adjacent to the ARSP area that
cannot be fully mitigated. This conclusion is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313 for the
original ARSP.
MM 5.1 -1 Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner /developer shall submit a
shade and shadow analysis to the Planning and Building Department for review
and approval demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would avoid creating
significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses to the maximum
extent feasible. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor
active areas (e.g., outdoor eating areas, hotel/motel swimming pools, and
residential front and back yards) or structures that include sensitive uses (e.g.,
residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows
for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours.
46
MM 5.1 - Prior to issuance of building permits, all plumbing or other similar pipes and
fixtures located on the exterior of the building shall be shown on plans as fully
screened from view of adjacent public rights -of -way and from adjacent properties
by architectural devices and/or appropriate building materials. A note indicating
that these improvements will be installed prior to final building and zoning
inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building
permits.
MM 5.1 - Ongoing, the property owner /developer shall be responsible for the removal of
any on -site graffiti within 24 hours of its application.
MM 5.1 - Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the location and configuration of all lighting
fixtures including ground- mounted lighting fixtures utilized to accent buildings,
landscape elements, or to illuminate pedestrian areas shall be shown on all Final
Site Plans. All proposed surface parking area lighting fixtures shall be down -
lighted with a maximum height of twelve (12) feet adjacent to any residential
properties. All lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighting toward the area
to be illuminated and away from adjacent residential property lines.
MM 5.1 - Prior to fmal building and zoning inspections, private streets within the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan area shall have street lights installed which are compatible
with the design standards used for the public streets as determined by the Public
Utilities Department.
MM 5.1 - Prior to final building and zoning inspections, root and sidewalk barriers shall be
provided for trees within seven feet of public sidewalks.
MM 5.1 - Prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner /developer shall
submit to the Planning and Building Department a letter from a licensed landscape
architect certifying that all landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed
in accordance with landscaping plans approved in connection with the Final Site
Plan.
MM 5.1 - Ongoing, all on -site non - Public Realm, landscaping and irrigation systems, and
Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, within area in which dedication
has not been accepted by the City, shall be maintained by the property
owner /developer, in compliance with City standards.
MM 5.1 - Ongoing, any tree planted within the Setback Realm shall be replaced in a timely
manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead.
MM 5.1 - 10 Ongoing, a licensed arborist shall be hired by the property owner /developer to be
responsible for all tree trimming.
MM 5.1 - 11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous
payment, a fee for street tree purposes shall be paid or cause to be paid to the City
of Anaheim based on the length of street frontage in an amount as established by
47
City Council resolution or credit against the fee given for City authorized
improvements installed by the property owner /developer.
MM 5.1 - 12 Prior to issuance of each building permit, all air conditioning facilities and other
roof and ground- mounted equipment shall be shown on plans as shielded from
public view and the sound buffered to comply with City of Anaheim noise
ordinances from any adjacent residential or transient- occupied properties. A note
indicating that these improvements shall be installed prior to final building and
zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building
permits.
MM 5.1 - 13 Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that the rear elevations of
buildings visible from off-site areas shall be architecturally accented to portray a
finished look.
MM 5.1 - 14 Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that no shuttle/bus /vehicular
drop -off areas shall be permitted in hotel/motel or vacation resort front setback
area.
Impacts Related to Air Quality
Potential Impact. The Project would violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an
existing or projected air quality violation.
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: With incorporation of the proposed mitigation measures,
construction emissions of criteria pollutants would be less than significant. The conclusion for
construction emissions is not consistent with that provided in MEIR 313. MEIR 313 projected
that construction emissions of VOC, NOx, CO, and PM10 would be significant and
unavoidable.
Long -term operational emissions of VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 would exceed the
SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds. The proposed mitigation measures would reduce
vehicle emissions, but the reductions are not reliably quantifiable and are not anticipated to
reduce emissions to less than the SCAQMD CEQA thresholds. Therefore, the impact would be
significant and unavoidable. The conclusion for operational emissions is consistent with that
provided in MEIR 313, except for PM2.5, which was not a criteria pollutant when MEIR 313
was prepared.
48
Local PM10 and PM2.5 emissions would exceed the SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds
for short-term periods when excavation would occur near sensitive receptors; the impact would
be significant and unavoidable. The local impact analysis was not conducted for MEIR 313.
MM 5.2 -1 Ongoing during Project operation, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements
for off -peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as
practicable.
MM 5.2 -2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design
and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The
information shall be denoted on the Project plans and specifications. The property
owner /developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations
demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would
not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations
shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of
coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property
owner /developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from
architectural coatings and asphalt usage:
a. Use nonsolvent -based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; and,
b. Use solvent based coatings, where they are necessary.
MM 5.2 -3 Ongoing during construction, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce construction - related air quality impacts. These measures shall
include, but are not limited to:
a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative
measures shall be followed during earth - moving operations to minimize
fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim
Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to
exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in
disturbed areas as quickly as practicable.
b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as
parking) on -site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the
on -site haul roads shall be paved.
c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil
binders, according to manufacturer's specification, to exposed piles.
d. Roadways adjacent to the Project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled
export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust;
and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported
from the Project site occur.
e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite
when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with
vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the Project site.
49
f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered
prior to entering public streets.
g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires
onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas.
h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes.
i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and
maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed.
j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or
less.
k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust)
exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts.
1. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts
offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403,
which restricts visible emissions from construction.
m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers,
dozers, etc.) where practicable.
n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators
rather than temporary power generators, where practicable.
o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned.
P. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable.
MM 5.2 - Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to
issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property
owner /developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans
shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the
Project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a Project in
the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made
to move it within Orange County. The property owner /developer shall offer
recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by
private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all
can be reused on the project site.
MM 5.2 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best
Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control
Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of
permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department.
MM 5.2 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce
operation - related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not
limited to the following:
50
a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through
use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances.
c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in
building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
d. Use drought- resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used
in pumping and transporting water.
e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or
participate in a joint development daycare center
f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated
that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment
current at the time makes this installation infeasible.
MM 5.2 - Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for any proposed sensitive land
uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be located within 500 feet
of the near edge of the I -5 freeway unless it is demonstrated that the health risks
have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the
SCAQMD at the time of building permit application.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the fmal building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and
financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort
Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in
conjunction with the on -going operation of the Project. The property owner shall
also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these
programs ongoing during Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be
approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner /developer shall
provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate
rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation
Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN
recommendations to the extent feasible.
MM 5.14 Prior to the fmal building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a
covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during Project implementation,
the property owner /developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The
form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's Office. Objectives
of the TDM program shall be:
a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.
b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce Project -
generated trips.
51
c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip
origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and
approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and
future employees' commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons
transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list
below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring
that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during
Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City
Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
a. On -site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on -site services such
as the food, retail, and other services.
b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the
purpose of providing a "matching" of employees with other employees
who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.
c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose
of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to
one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing
vanpool programs.
d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including
commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on -site sales to
encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from
throughout the region.
e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in
proximity to the Project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage
employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When
appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests.
f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling
alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers
should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes
throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of
these options.
g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide
employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to
work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other
vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.
h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive
program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put
highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.
i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts.
52
j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a "compressed work week" program,
which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for
employees.
k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a "telecommuting" program
that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with
modem).
1. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that
provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than
single- occupant auto to travel to work.
m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and
shuttles.
n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer
employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public
transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax -free status for up to $65
per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use
public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.
o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for
bicycling to work.
P. Special "Premium" for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction.
Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who
recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction
programs.
q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other
alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction
of longest commute trips.
MM 5.14 -20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall meet
with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is
required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall
be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation
Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA).
MM 5.14 -21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or
lessee shall designate an on -site contact that will be responsible for coordinating
with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on -site
coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the Project with the
ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement
with all of the Project participants.
MM 5.14 -22 Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of
the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic
Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot
53
be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs
and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee
programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the
recommended improvements.
Potential Impact: The Project would expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations.
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: There would be no potential for a CO hotspot or exposure of
persons to CO in excess of SCAQMD criteria for CO ambient air quality. Construction activities
would result in short-term, Project - generated emissions of diesel PM from the exhaust of off -road
heavy -duty diesel equipment used for site preparation (e.g., excavation, grading, and clearing);
paving; building construction; application of architectural coatings; and other miscellaneous
activities. However, Project - generated, construction- related emissions of toxic air contaminants
(TAC)s would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial emissions of TACs because (1) the use
of off -road heavy -duty diesel equipment for construction activities would be temporary (short in
duration when compared to 70 years) and (2) in combination with the highly dispersive properties
of diesel PM and further reductions in exhaust emissions from improved equipment and the impact
would be less than significant.
Short-term exposure of persons to PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations exceeding the SCAQMD
CEQA significance thresholds would occur during the Project's mass grading and excavation phase
near sensitive receptors; the impact would be significant and unavoidable. Exposure of persons to
TACs would be less than significant. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to local PM
concentrations or toxic air contaminants; therefore, a finding regarding the SEIR's consistency
with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
MM 5.2 - Ongoing during Project operation, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements
for off -peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as
practicable.
MM 5.2 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design
and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The
information shall be denoted on the Project plans and specifications. The property
owner /developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations
demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would
not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations
shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of
coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property
54
owner /developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from
architectural coatings and asphalt usage:
a. Use nonsolvent -based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; and,
b. Use solvent based coatings, where they are necessary.
MM 5.2 -3 Ongoing during construction, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce construction - related air quality impacts. These measures shall
include, but are not limited to:
a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative
measures shall be followed during earth- moving operations to minimize
fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim
Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to
exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in
disturbed areas as quickly as practicable.
b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as
parking) on -site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the
on -site haul roads shall be paved.
c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil
binders, according to manufacturer's specification, to exposed piles.
d. Roadways adjacent to the Project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled
export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust;
and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported
from the Project site occur.
e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite
when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with
vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the Project site.
f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered
prior to entering public streets.
g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires
onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas.
h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes.
i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and
maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed.
j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or
less.
k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust)
exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts.
1. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts
offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403,
which restricts visible emissions from construction.
55
m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers,
dozers, etc.) where practicable.
n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators
rather than temporary power generators, where practicable.
o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned.
P. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable.
MM 5.2-4 Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to
issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property
owner /developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans
shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the
Project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a Project in
the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made
to move it within Orange County. The property owner /developer shall offer
recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by
private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all
can be reused on the project site.
MM 5.2 -5 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best
Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control
Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of
permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department.
MM 5.2 -6 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce
operation - related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not
limited to the following:
a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through
use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances.
c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in
building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
d. Use drought- resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used
in pumping and transporting water.
e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or
participate in a joint development daycare center
f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated
that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment
current at the time makes this installation infeasible.
56
MM 5.2 -7 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for any proposed sensitive land
uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be located within 500 feet
of the near edge of the I -5 freeway unless it is demonstrated that the health risks
have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the
SCAQMD at the time of building permit application.
MM 5.14 -4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and
financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort
Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in
conjunction with the on -going operation of the Project. The property owner shall
also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these
programs ongoing during Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be
approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
MM 5.14 -5 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner /developer shall
provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate
rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation
Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN
recommendations to the extent feasible.
MM 5.14 -8 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a
covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during Project implementation,
the property owner /developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The
form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's Office. Objectives
of the TDM program shall be:
a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.
b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce Project -
generated trips.
c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip
origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership.
MM 5.14 -9 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and
approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and
future employees' commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons
transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list
below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring
that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during
Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City
Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
a. On -site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on -site services such
as the food, retail, and other services.
57
b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the
purpose of providing a "matching" of employees with other employees
who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.
c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose
of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to
one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing
vanpool programs.
d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including
commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on -site sales to
encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from
throughout the region.
e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in
proximity to the Project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage
employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When
appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests.
f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling
alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers
should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes
throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of
these options.
g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide
employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to
work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other
vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.
h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive
program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put
highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.
i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts.
j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a "compressed work week" program,
which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for
employees.
k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a "telecommuting" program
that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with
modem).
1. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that
provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than
single- occupant auto to travel to work.
m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and
shuttles.
n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer
employees fmancial incentives for ridesharing or using public
transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax -free status for up to $65
58
per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use
public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.
o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for
bicycling to work.
P. Special "Premium" for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction.
Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who
recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction
programs.
q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other
alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction
of longest commute trips.
MM 5.14 - 20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall meet
with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is
required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall
be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation
Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA).
MM 5.14 - 21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or
lessee shall designate an on -site contact that will be responsible for coordinating
with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on -site
coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the Project with the
ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement
with all of the Project participants.
MM 5.14 - 22 Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of
the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic
Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot
be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs
and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee
programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the
recommended improvements.
Potential Impact. The Project would result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria
pollutant for which the Project region is non - attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient
air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone
precursors).
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
59
Facts in Support of Finding: The projected maximum daily emissions for construction
of the proposed PR District improvements would not exceed the SCAQMD CEQA
significance thresholds but would approach the thresholds for VOC and NOx. It is
foreseeable that development in the C -R District could be built concurrently with those
in the PR District, or that the size and intensity of concurrent future projects in the C -R
district would exceed the assumptions for the calculations in the Draft SEIR. Thus,
depending on the sizes of individual projects and the construction phase overlaps, the
concurrent construction of several projects could result in a cumulative increase of
VOC, NOx, and possibly other criteria pollutants to a level above the thresholds.
Additionally, build out of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would result in long term
emissions of VOC, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 that would exceed the SCAQMD CEQA
significance thresholds. Build out of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan could result in
cumulatively considerable increase of nonattainment pollutants during both the
construction and operational phases of the Project. Mitigation measures would not
reduce the impact to less than significant. Therefore, the impact would be significant
and unavoidable. The conclusion for cumulative emissions is consistent with that
provided in MEIR 313.
MM 5.2 -1 Ongoing during Project operation, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements
for off -peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as
practicable.
MM 5.2 -2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design
and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The
information shall be denoted on the Project plans and specifications. The property
owner /developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations
demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would
not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations
shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of
coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property
owner /developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from
architectural coatings and asphalt usage:
a. Use non - solvent -based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; and,
b. Use solvent -based coatings, where they are necessary.
MM 5.2 -3 Ongoing during construction, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce construction - related air quality impacts. These measures shall
include, but are not limited to:
a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative
measures shall be followed during earth - moving operations to minimize
fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim
Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to
exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in
disturbed areas as quickly as practicable.
60
b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as
parking) on -site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the
on -site haul roads shall be paved.
c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil
binders, according to manufacturer's specification, to exposed piles.
d. Roadways adjacent to the Project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled
export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust;
and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported
from the Project site occur.
e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite
when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with
vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the Project site.
f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered
prior to entering public streets.
g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires
onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas.
h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes.
i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and
maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed.
j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or
less.
k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust)
exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts.
1. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts
offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403,
which restricts visible emissions from construction.
m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers,
dozers, etc.) where practicable.
n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators
rather than temporary power generators, where practicable.
o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned.
P. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable.
MM 5.2 -4 Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to
issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property
owner /developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans
shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the
Project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in
the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made
to move it within Orange County. The property owner /developer shall offer
61
recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by
private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all
can be reused on the project site.
MM 5.2 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best
Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control
Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of
permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department.
MM 5.2 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce
operation - related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not
limited to the following:
a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through
use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances.
c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in
building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
d. Use drought- resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used
in pumping and transporting water.
e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or
participate in a joint development daycare center
f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated
that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment
current at the time makes this installation infeasible.
MM 5.2 - Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for any proposed sensitive land
uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be located within 500 feet
of the near edge of the I -5 freeway unless it is demonstrated that the health risks
have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the
SCAQMD at the time of building permit application.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and
financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort
Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in
conjunction with the on -going operation of the Project. The property owner shall
also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these
programs ongoing during Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be
approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner /developer shall
provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate
rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation
62
Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN
recommendations to the extent feasible.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a
covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during Project implementation,
the property owner /developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The
form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's Office. Objectives
of the TDM program shall be:
a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.
b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce Project -
generated trips.
c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip
origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the fmal building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and
approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and
future employees' commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons
transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list
below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring
that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during
Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City
Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
a. On -site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on -site services such
as the food, retail, and other services.
b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the
purpose of providing a "matching" of employees with other employees
who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.
c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose
of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to
one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing
vanpool programs.
d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including
commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on -site sales to
encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from
throughout the region.
e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in
proximity to the Project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage
employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When
appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests.
f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling
alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers
63
should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes
throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of
these options.
g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide
employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to
work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other
vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.
h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive
program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put
highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.
i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts.
j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a "compressed work week" program,
which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for
employees.
k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a "telecommuting" program
that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with
modem).
1. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that
provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than
single- occupant auto to travel to work.
m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and
shuttles.
n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer
employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public
transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax -free status for up to $65
per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use
public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.
o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for
bicycling to work.
P. Special "Premium" for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction.
Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who
recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction
programs.
q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other
alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction
of longest commute trips.
MM 5.14 - 20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall meet
with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is
required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall
be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation
64
Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA).
MM 5.14 -21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or
lessee shall designate an on -site contact that will be responsible for coordinating
with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on -site
coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the Project with the
ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement
with all of the Project participants.
MM 5.14 -22 Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of
the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic
Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot
be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs
and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee
programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the
recommended improvements.
Potential Impact. The Project would conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air
quality plan.
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: Build out of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan would result in
long term emissions of VOC, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 that would exceed the SCAQMD CEQA
significance thresholds. The Proposed Project does not propose a change to the General Plan land
use designations. However, the anticipated increase in density may result in greater VMT than
those anticipated in the 2007 AQMP. Based on the potential for the Proposed Project to result in
an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, it is concluded that the
Proposed Project could conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2007 AQMP. The
Proposed Project would conflict with the applicable air quality plan; the impact would be
significant and unavoidable. The conclusion for conformance with the AQMP is more significant
than the conclusion provided in MEIR 313. It should be noted, however, that the current criteria
for conformance with the AQMP are different than the applicable criteria when MEIR 313 was
prepared.
MM 5.2 -1 Ongoing during Project operation, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements
for off -peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as
practicable.
65
MM 5.2 -2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design
and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The
information shall be denoted on the Project plans and specifications. The property
owner /developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations
demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would
not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations
shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of
coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property
owner /developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from
architectural coatings and asphalt usage:
a. Use nonsolvent -based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; and,
b. Use solvent based coatings, where they are necessary.
MM 5.2 -3 Ongoing during construction, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce construction - related air quality impacts. These measures shall
include, but are not limited to:
a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative
measures shall be followed during earth - moving operations to minimize
fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim
Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to
exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in
disturbed areas as quickly as practicable.
b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as
parking) on -site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the
on -site haul roads shall be paved.
c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil
binders, according to manufacturer's specification, to exposed piles.
d. Roadways adjacent to the Project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled
export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust;
and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported
from the Project site occur.
e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite
when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with
vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the Project site.
f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered
prior to entering public streets.
g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires
onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas.
h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes.
i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and
maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed.
66
j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or
less.
k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust)
exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts.
1. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts
offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403,
which restricts visible emissions from construction.
m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers,
dozers, etc.) where practicable.
n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators
rather than temporary power generators, where practicable.
o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned.
P. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable.
MM 5.2 -4 Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to
issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property
owner /developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans
shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the
Project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in
the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made
to move it within Orange County. The property owner /developer shall offer
recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by
private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all
can be reused on the project site.
MM 5.2 -5 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best
Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control
Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of
permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department.
MM 5.2 -6 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce
operation - related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not
limited to the following:
a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through
use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances.
c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in
building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
d. Use drought - resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used
in pumping and transporting water.
67
e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or
participate in a joint development daycare center
f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated
that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment
current at the time makes this installation infeasible.
MM 5.2 -7 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for any proposed sensitive land
uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be located within 500 feet
of the near edge of the I -5 freeway unless it is demonstrated that the health risks
have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the
SCAQMD at the time of building permit application.
MM 5.14 -4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and
financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort
Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in
conjunction with the on -going operation of the Project. The property owner shall
also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these
programs ongoing during Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be
approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
MM 5.14 -5 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner /developer shall
provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate
rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation
Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN
recommendations to the extent feasible.
MM 5.14 -8 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a
covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during Project implementation,
the property owner /developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The
form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's Office. Objectives
of the TDM program shall be:
a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.
b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce Project -
generated trips.
c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip
origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership.
MM 5.14 -9 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and
approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and
future employees' commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons
transportation options. The options include, but are not limited to, the list below.
The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the
approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during Project
68
operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's
Office prior to recordation.
a. On -site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on -site services such
as the food, retail, and other services.
b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the
purpose of providing a "matching" of employees with other employees
who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.
c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose
of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to
one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing
vanpool programs.
d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including
commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on -site sales to
encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from
throughout the region.
e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in
proximity to the Project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage
employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When
appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests.
f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling
alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers
should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes
throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of
these options.
g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide
employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to
work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other
vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.
h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive
program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put
highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.
i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts.
j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a "compressed work week" program,
which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for
employees.
k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a "telecommuting" program
that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with
modem).
1. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that
provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than
single- occupant auto to travel to work.
69
m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and
shuttles.
n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer
employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public
transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax -free status for up to $65
per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use
public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.
o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for
bicycling to work.
P. Special "Premium" for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction.
Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who
recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction
programs.
q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other
alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction
of longest commute trips.
MM 5.14 - 20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall meet
with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is
required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall
be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation
Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA).
MM 5.14 - 21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or
lessee shall designate an on -site contact that will be responsible for coordinating
with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on -site
coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the Project with the
ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement
with all of the Project participants.
MM 5.14 - 22 Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of
the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic
Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot
be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs
and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee
programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the
recommended improvements.
Impacts Related to Greenhouse Gas Emissions
Potential Impact. The Project would generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly,
that may have a significant impact on the environment.
70
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: Temporary impacts would result from Project construction
activities. GHGs would be emitted by off -road and on -road construction equipment and worker
vehicles. The average annual estimated GHG emissions from construction 1,367 MTCO2e.
Long -term annual GHG emissions attributed to the Proposed Project would be generated from
vehicle trips generated by the proposed land uses and from the increased use of electricity,
natural gas, and water within the ARSP. GHG emissions in 2030 are estimated to be 499,799
MTCO2e per year, which would be more than twice the existing GHG emissions of 231,179
MTCO2e. Vehicle emissions would constitute 67 percent of the GHG emissions. Direct and
indirect GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable and would be a significant and
unavoidable impact. MEIR 313 did not evaluate impacts related to GHG emissions; therefore, a
finding regarding the SEIR' s consistency with MEIR 313 cannot be made.
MM 5.2 - Ongoing during Project operation, the property owner /developer shall implement
measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements
for off -peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as
practicable.
MM 5.2 - Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to
issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property
owner /developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans
shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the
Project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in
the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made
to move it within Orange County. The property owner /developer shall offer
recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by
private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all
can be reused on the project site.
MM 5.2 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best
Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control
Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of
permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department.
MM 5.2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce
operation - related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not
limited to the following:
71
a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through
use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances.
c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in
building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
d. Use drought- resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used
in pumping and transporting water.
e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or
participate in a joint development daycare center
f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated
that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment
current at the time makes this installation infeasible.
MM 5.8 -5 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer shall
install piping on -site with Project water mains so that reclaimed water may be
used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available.
MM 5.14 -4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and
financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort
Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in
conjunction with the on -going operation of the Project. The property owner shall
also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these
programs ongoing during Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be
approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
MM 5.14 -5 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner /developer shall
provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate
rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation
Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN
recommendations to the extent feasible.
MM 5.14 -8 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a
covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during Project implementation,
the property owner /developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The
form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's Office. Objectives
of the TDM program shall be:
a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.
b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce Project -
generated trips.
c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip
origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership.
72
MM 5.14 - Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and
approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and
future employees' commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons
transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list
below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring
that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during
Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City
Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
a. On -site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on -site services such
as the food, retail, and other services.
b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the
purpose of providing a "matching" of employees with other employees
who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.
c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose
of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to
one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing
vanpool programs.
d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including
commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on -site sales to
encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from
throughout the region.
e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in
proximity to the Project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage
employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When
appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests.
f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling
alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers
should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes
throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of
these options.
g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide
employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to
work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other
vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.
h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive
program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put
highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.
i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts.
j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a "compressed work week" program,
which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for
employees.
73
k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a "telecommuting" program
that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with
modem).
1. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that
provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than
single- occupant auto to travel to work.
m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and
shuttles.
n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer
employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public
transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax -free status for up to $65
per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use
public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.
o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for
bicycling to work.
P. Special "Premium" for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction.
Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who
recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction
programs.
q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other
alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction
of longest commute trips.
MM 5.14 - 20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall meet
with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is
required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall
be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation
Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA).
MM 5.14 - 21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or
lessee shall designate an on -site contact that will be responsible for coordinating
with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on -site
coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the Project with the
ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement
with all of the Project participants.
MM 5.15 - Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final
building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on -going basis during
Project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public
Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water
conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be
shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner /developer, to the
extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following:
74
a. Use of low -flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems.
b. Use of waterway recirculation systems.
c. Low -flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and
urinals.
d. Use of self - closing valves on drinking valves.
e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic
systems which use moisture sensors.
f. Use of low -flow shower heads in hotels.
g. Water efficient ice - machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other
water -using appliances.
h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are
lowest.
i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water
conservation.
j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible.
MM 5.17 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /develop shall
consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Resource
Efficiency Business and Community Programs Division in order to review energy
efficient measures to incorporate into the Project design. Prior to the final
building and zoning inspection, the property owner developer shall implement
these energy efficient measures, which may include the following:
a. High - efficiency air- conditioning systems with EMS (computer) control
b. Variable air volume (VAV) distribution
c. Outside air (100 %) economizer cycle
d. Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads
e. Isolated HVAC zone control by floors /separable activity areas
f. Specification of premium- efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor
motors, air - handling units, and fan-coil units)
g. Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces
h. Use of compact fluorescent lamps
i. Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps
j. Use of light emitting diode (LED) or equivalent energy - efficient lighting
for outdoor lighting
k. Use of Energy Star® exit lighting or exit signage
1. Use of T -8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard
fluorescent fixtures are identified
75
m. Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal -halide or high -
pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and
parking lots
n. Consideration of thermal energy storage air- conditioning for spaces or
facilities that may require air- conditioning during summer, day -peak
periods.
o. For swimming pools and spas, incorporate solar heating, automatic covers,
and efficient pumps and motors, as feasible.
P. Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as:
1) New construction design review, in which the City cost - shares
engineering for up to $10,000 for design of energy efficient
buildings and systems
2) New Construction — cash incentives ($300 to $400 per kW
reduction in load) for efficiency that exceeds Title 24 requirements
3) Green Building Program — offers accelerated plan approval,
financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical
assistance.
MM 5.17 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building
Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each
building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and
Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent.
MM 5.17 - Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall
coordinate with the Public Utilities Department to incorporate feasible renewable
energy generation measures into the Project. These measures may include but not
be limited to use of solar and small wind turbine sources on new and existing
facilities and the use of solar powered lighting in parking areas.
MM 5.19 - Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to final
building and zoning Inspection, the property owner /developer shall submit Project
plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the
plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as
administered by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange and City of
Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final building and zoning
inspection, implementation of said plan shall commence and shall remain in full
effect. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid
waste generation include, but are not limited to:
a. Detailing the location and design of on -site recycling facilities.
b. Providing on -site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling.
c. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for hazardous
material disposal.
76
d. Participating in the City of Anaheim's "Recycle Anaheim" program or
other substitute program as may be developed by the City.
In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction
Act of 1989 (AB 939), the property owner /developer shall implement
numerous solid waste reduction programs, as required by the Public
Works Department, including, but not limited to:
1) Facilitating recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations
for sorting and recycling bins.
2) Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by
providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection
and storing.
3) Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by
providing adequate space for sorting and storing.
4) Providing trash compactors for non - recyclable materials whenever
feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number
of trips required for collection.
5) Prohibiting curbside pick -up.
MM 5.19 - Ongoing during Project operation, the following practices shall be implemented,
as feasible, by the property owner /developer:
a. Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and packaging.
b. Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard.
c. Collection of office paper for recycling.
d. Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling.
e. Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges,
oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery.
MM 5.19 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall
demonstrate that the plans include provisions for the installation of trash and
recycle receptacles near all benches and near high traffic areas such as plazas,
transit stops and retail and dining establishments.
MM 5.19 - Prior to issuance of each grading and building permit, the Property
Owner/Developer shall submit to the Planning Director or Planning Services
Manager for approval a Construction Waste Management Plan that, at a
minimum, specifies that at least 75 percent of non - hazardous construction and
demolition debris shall be recycled or salvaged and identifies the materials to be
diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or co-
mingled.
77
Impacts Related to Noise
Potential Impact. The Project would expose people to or generate (short-term) noise levels in excess
of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other
agencies. The Project would result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise
levels in the Project vicinity above levels existing without the Project.
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: Adverse noise impacts during construction would be localized
and would occur intermittently for varying periods of time throughout the construction period.
Construction of a development project would have the potential to create temporary, significant
and unavoidable impacts at nearby noise - sensitive receptors, which would cease after
construction. Construction activities associated with future development within the ARSP area
have the potential to significantly impact noise - sensitive receptors. Further, if construction
within the ARSP area were to occur simultaneously at two or more projects in close proximity,
construction noise at sensitive receptors may be greater than for a single project and would be
significant and unavoidable. Adherence to the standard requirements and implementation of the
proposed mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts; however, these impacts may
remain significant and unavoidable. This conclusion for temporary construction noise impacts
is consistent with that provided in MEIR 313.
MM 5.10 - Ongoing during construction, the property owner /developer shall ensure that all
internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with
properly maintained mufflers.
MM 5.10 - Prior to approval of each final site plan, the property owner /developer shall submit
a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the
Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and
defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if
warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level
Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the
final location of such buildings and noise - sensitive uses inside and surrounding
the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property
owner /developer prior to final building and zoning inspections.
MM 5.10 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, for structures that are adjacent to noise -
sensitive areas such as residences, the property owner /developer shall ensure that
all mechanical ventilation units are shown on plans and installed in compliance
with Sound Pressure Level Ordinance.
78
MM 5.10 - Prior to issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property
owner /developer shall ensure that noise from parking structures adjacent to
residential areas will be reduced by the provision of convenient access to parking
facilities, sound attenuation devices (louvers and walls), the use of textured deck
surfaces to reduce tire squalling, and tiering a parking facility to provide greater
distance to the receptor.
MM 5.10 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on building
plans indicating that during construction, the property owner /developer shall
install and maintain specially designed construction batriers at the Project
perimeter areas. The construction sound barriers shall be a minimum height of 8
feet with a minimum surface weight of 1.25 pounds per square foot or a minimum
Sound Transmission Class (STC) rating of 25. The structure shall be a continuous
barrier. Gates and other entry doors shall be constructed with suitable mullions,
astragals, seals, or other design techniques to minimize sound leakage when in the
closed position. Access doors should be self closing where feasible. Vision ports
are permissible providing they are filled with an acceptable solid vision product.
MM 5.10 - Ongoing during construction and Project operation, pressure washing operations
for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to graffiti or other aesthetical
considerations shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 AM
and 8:00 PM.
MM 5.10 - Ongoing during construction and Project operation, sweeping operations in the
parking facilities and private on -site roadways shall be performed utilizing
sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than
60 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line.
MM 5.10 - Ongoing during construction, property owners /developers shall pay for all
reasonable costs associated with noise monitoring which shall include monitoring
conducted by a certified acoustical engineer under the direction of the Planning
and Building Department four times a year on a random basis to ensure that
outdoor construction- related sound levels at any point on the exterior Project
boundary property line do not exceed 60 dBA between the hours of 7:00 PM and
7:00 AM of the following day where outside construction is occurring. If a
complaint is received by the City, additional noise monitoring shall be conducted
at the discretion of the City. If the monitoring finds that the 60 dBA threshold is
being exceeded, construction activities will be modified immediately to bring the
sound level below the 60 dBA requirement, with additional follow -up monitoring
conducted to confirm compliance.
MM 5.10 - Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
present plans and calculations to the Planning Department, Building Division to
demonstrate that noise levels would be less than 65 dBA CNEL for outdoor use
areas (including dining patios, pools, playgrounds, or outdoor gathering areas).
This requirement can be accomplished through shielding areas behind buildings or
the construction of a noise barrier.
79
MM 5.10 - 10 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner /developer shall
present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building
Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation
equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on -site noise
sources are designed to meet the City's 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at
the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing
ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more
restrictive.
MM 5.10 - 11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, a note shall be provided on plans
indicating that there shall be no operation of large bulldozers or vibratory rollers
within 25 feet of any existing residence.
MM 5.10 - 12 Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated
during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and
submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to assess
and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities.
Impacts Related to Transportation and Traffic
Potential Impact. The Project would conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing
measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes
of transportation including mass transit and non - motorized travel and relevant components of the
circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways,
pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit.
Finding: There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this impact to a less than
significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the fording that specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other considerations, including provision of employment opportunities
for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation measures or Project alternatives
identified in the Final SEIR, which would require the adoption of a Statement of Overriding
Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: The Proposed Project would have the potential to cause
intersections, arterial segments, freeway ramp termini intersections, freeway ramps, freeway
mainlines and freeway weaving areas to operate at unacceptable LOS. Under Year 2030
conditions, the Project would lead to significant adverse impacts at four freeway ramps;
however, the necessary improvements are infeasible due to physical, right -of -way, and other
environmental constraints, thereby resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. Even with
implementation of mitigation measures, potential impacts related to transportation and traffic
will remain significant and unavoidable due to the infeasibility of necessary improvements. The
Proposed Project would also create an adverse impact on weaving operations at one freeway
ramp and cumulatively contribute to seven other weaving deficiencies. At intersections and
arterial segments located in the City of Orange and on Caltrans facilities, including freeway
ramps, mainline segments, and weaving segments, the City of Anaheim has no jurisdiction to
80
implement the improvements necessary to mitigate Project impacts. If improvements outside of
the City are not completed for reasons beyond the City of Anaheim's control (e.g., the City of
Anaheim cannot undertake or require improvements outside of Anaheim's jurisdiction or the
City cannot construct improvements in the Caltrans right -of -way without Caltrans approval),
traffic impacts on these facilities would remain significant and unavoidable. This conclusion is
consistent with that provided in MEIR 313 for the original ARSP.
MM 5.14 - Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or
more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, the
property owner /developer shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to
identify when the improvements identified in this traffic analysis shall be designed
and constructed.
MM 5.14 - Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property
owner /developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and
Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts
determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the
building permit with credit given for City - authorized improvements provided by
the property owner /developer. The property owner shall also and participate in all
applicable reimbursement or benefit districts, which have been established.
MM 5.14 - Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner /developer shall irrevocably
offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary
construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s) -of -way adjacent to
their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and
financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort
Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in
conjunction with the on -going operation of the Project. The property owner shall
also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these
programs ongoing during Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be
approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner /developer shall
provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate
rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation
Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN
recommendations to the extent feasible.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a hotel development that exceeds
100 rooms per gross acre within the Commercial Recreation (C -R) District
(Development Area 1) within the Convention Center (CC) Medium density
category, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that
ongoing during Project implementation, the property owner /developer shall
81
implement TDM measures sufficient to reduce the actual trip generation from the
development to no more than the trips assumed by the City's traffic model. The
form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's Office.
MM 5.14 - Ongoing during construction, if the Anaheim Police Department or the Anaheim
Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary
traffic control services, the property owner /developer shall reimburse the City, on
a fair -share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a
covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during Project implementation,
the property owner /developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive
Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The
form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney's Office. Objectives
of the TDM program shall be:
a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.
b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce Project -
generated trips.
c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip
origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership.
MM 5.14 - Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner /developer
shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and
approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and
future employees' commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons
transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list
below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring
that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during
Project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City
Attorney's Office prior to recordation.
a. On -site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on -site services such
as the food, retail, and other services.
b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the
purpose of providing a "matching" of employees with other employees
who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.
c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose
of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to
one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing
vanpool programs.
d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including
commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on -site sales to
encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from
throughout the region.
82
e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in
proximity to the Project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage
employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When
appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests.
f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling
alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers
should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes
throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of
these options.
g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide
employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to
work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other
vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.
h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive
program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put
highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.
i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts.
j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a "compressed work week" program,
which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for
employees.
k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a "telecommuting" program
that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with
modem).
1. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that
provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than
single- occupant auto to travel to work.
m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and
shuttles.
n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer
employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public
transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax -free status for up to $65
per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use
public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.
o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees fmancial incentives for
bicycling to work.
P. Special "Premium" for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction.
Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who
recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction
programs.
q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other
alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction
of longest commute trips.
83
MM 5.14 - 10 Prior to approval of each tentative tract or parcel map, the following Street Design
Elements shall be shown on each tentative tract or parcel map:
a. Street cross - sections, including dimensions, labels, circulation designation
(i.e., Resort Secondary) and whether public or private.
b. Street grades and vertical alignment.
c. Horizontal alignment, including radii, and cul -de -sac radii.
MM 5.14 - 11 Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or issuance of the first building
permit, whichever occurs first, in the event that a parcel is subdivided and there is
a need for common on -site circulation and/or parking, prior to recordation of a
subdivision map, an unsubordinated covenant providing for reciprocal access
and/or parking, as appropriate, approved by the Planning Director or Planning
Services Manager, shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County
Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning
Division of the Planning Department. If the reciprocal access is across parcel lines
or if public rights of way are required for reciprocal access; Public Works
approval shall be required.
MM 5.14 - 12 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the location of any proposed
gates across a driveway shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Engineer. Gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a
manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public streets.
Installation of any gates shall conform to the current version of Engineering
Standard Detail No. 475.
MM 5.14 - 13 Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall show that all driveways shall
be constructed with a minimum fifteen (15) foot radius curb returns as required by
the City Engineer, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer.
MM 5.14 - 14 Prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs
first, security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit,
completion guarantee, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City
Engineer shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of
all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, including preparation of
improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and
gutters, sidewalks, water facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and
drainage facilities and other appurtenant work, as required by the City Engineer
and in accordance with the specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer,
as may be modified by the City Engineer. Installation of said improvements shall
occur prior to final building and zoning inspections.
MM5.14 - 15 Based upon the improvement phasing analysis in the Project traffic study, the
property owner /developer shall implement traffic improvements as identified in
the Project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the
City's General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards,
and methodologies established by the Orange County Congestion Management
84
Program and the City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement
phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction, and fair -share
responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory
levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The
property owner /developer shall construct, bond for or enter into a funding
agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the
City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have
been identified.
MM 5.14 -16 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or
more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in
conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in MM 5.14 -1, property owners /developers will determine when the
intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions
identified in MM 5.14 -1.
MM 5.14 -17 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or
more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in
conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in MM 5.14 -1, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation with
the City of Orange:
a. The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts
created by the Project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair -
share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be
calculated in this analysis.
b. The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the Project's fair -share
responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange.
c. The property owner /developer shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair -share
cost prior to issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold
the amount received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint
program is executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the
fair -share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in
improved traffic flow at the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually
acceptable to both cities.
MM 5.14 -18 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan for any project forecast to generate 100 or
more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation
Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, in
conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as
required in MM 5.14 -1, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has
not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted
freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners /developers and the
City will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans:
85
a. The traffic study will identify the Project's proportionate impact on the
specific freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair -share
percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds
of significance, performance standards, and methodologies established in
the Orange County Congestion Management Program and the City of
Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines.
b. The City shall estimate the cost of the Project's fair -share responsibility in
cooperation with Caltrans.
MM 5.14 - 19 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permits,
whichever occurs first, the property owner /developer shall pay the identified fair -
share responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in MM 5.14 -15. The
City shall allocate the property owner /developer's fair -share contribution to traffic
mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline
and ramp locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the
City,
MM 5.14 - 20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner /developer shall meet
with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is
required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall
be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus
turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation
Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority
(OCTA).
MM 5.14 - 21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or
lessee shall designate an on -site contact that will be responsible for coordinating
with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on -site
coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the Project with the
ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement
with all of the Project participants.
MM 5.14 - 22 Subsequent to the certification of Final EIR No. 340, and prior to the approval of
the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic
Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot
be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs
and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee
programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the
recommended improvements.
Impacts Related to Stormwater
Potential Impact. The Project would require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage
facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant
environmental effects.
86
Finding: With implementation of the mitigation program, the Proposed Project would result in
less than significant Project impacts related to storm water. However, the Proposed Project's
cumulative contribution to the regional storm water collection system would be significant and
unavoidable because the City would have no control over the amount of storm water added to
the system from other jurisdictions. There are no feasible mitigation measures that would
reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Therefore, the City hereby makes the finding
that such changes or alterations are within the responsibility and jurisdiction of another public
agency and not the agency making the finding. Such changes have been adopted by such other
agency or can or should be adopted by such other agency, which would require the adoption of
a Statement of Overriding Considerations as a condition of Project approval.
Facts in Support of Finding: Implementation of the Proposed Project may worsen several
existing deficiencies within the City's storm drain system. Specific impacts are discussed above
according to the drainage areas, resulting in significant impacts related to the storm drain
facilities. However, the property owner /developer for each future development project will be
required to participate in the City's Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure
Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage system
deficiencies. Additionally, implementation of the proposed mitigation will ensure that impacts
to regional flood control facilities are reduced to less than significant levels.
Future growth under the Proposed Project will require the implementation of new or modified
storm water drainage facilities that would connect to existing utility systems provided by the
City of Anaheim and other agencies. All new growth within the ARSP area would occur in
compliance with mitigation measures provided in the Draft SEIR; however, the City has no
control over the growth and storm water contributions of areas outside of its jurisdiction. Any
addition of storm water to the regional storm water system may be cumulatively considerable
when combined with potential storm water flow increases from surrounding jurisdictions.
Therefore, mitigation of these impacts would be outside of the City's jurisdiction, and the
potential cumulative impact would be significant and unavoidable.
With implementation of the mitigation program, the Proposed Project would result in less than
significant Project impacts related to storm water. However, the Proposed Project's cumulative
contribution to the regional storm water collection system would be significant and unavoidable
because the City would have no control over the amount of storm water added to the system
from other jurisdictions. There are no feasible mitigation measures that would reduce this
impact to a less than significant level.
MM 5.18 - Prior to approval of a final subdivision map, or issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner /developer shall participate in
the City's Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement
(Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage system
deficiencies as follows:
The property owner /developer shall submit a report for review and approval by
the City Engineer to assist with determining the following:
a. If the specific development/redevelopment does not increase or redirect
current or historic storm water quantities /flows, then the property
87
owner /developer's responsibility shall be limited to participation in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to provide storm drainage
facilities in 10- and 25 -year storm frequencies and to protect
properties /structures for a 100 -year storm frequency.
b. If the specific development/redevelopment increases or redirects the
current or historic storm water quantity /flow, then the property
owner /developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney's office of the impact
prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or
building permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements
identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area. The
property owner /developer shall be required to install the storm drainage
facilities as recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South
Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for 10- and 25 -year storm
frequencies and to protect properties /structures for a 100 -year storm
frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by
the City or final building and zoning inspection for the building/structure,
whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner /developer shall
participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program as determined
by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, or
a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts
on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage system improvement
phasing plan for the Project shall be submitted by the property
owner /developer to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall
contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system; (2) all facility
sizes, including support calculations; (3) construction phasing; and,
(4) construction estimates.
MM 5.18 -2 Ongoing, the City shall work with the Orange County Flood Control District
(OCFCD) to ensure that flood control facilities are well maintained and capable of
accommodating, at a minimum, future 25 -year storm flows for City -owned and
maintained facilities, and 100 -year storm flows for County facilities. Where
improvements to local drainage facilities have the potential to increase discharges
to County facilities, the City shall analyze potential impacts to County facilities in
consultation with the Manager, County of Orange Flood Control Division.
Encroachment Permits shall be obtained from the County's Public Property
Permits Section for any activity performed within OCFCD's right of way.
MM 5.18 -3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City shall require that building plans
indicate that new developments will minimize stormwater and urban runoff into
drainage facilities by incorporating design features such as detention basins, on-
site water features, and other strategies.
88
5. FINDINGS REGARDING ALTERNATIVES
The CEQA Guidelines requires that an EIR "describe a range of reasonable alternatives to the Project,
or to the location of the Project, which could feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the Project
but would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the Project, and evaluate the
comparative merits of the alternatives" (CEQA Guidelines §15126.6[a]). Four alternatives were
evaluated. The alternatives were previously addressed as part of Master EIR 313 and were developed
to avoid or minimize impacts associated with implementation of the Proposed Project.
The following alternatives were analyzed:
• No- Project/Continuing Development
• Modified Land Use Alternative: Includes incorporating the Hotel Circle Specific Plan area into
the Project Area
• Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A
• Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative B
The City's findings and facts in support of findings with respect to each of the alternatives considered
are provided below. Consistent with the guidance set forth in CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.6, the
Findings address whether the alternative would feasibly attain most of the basic objectives of the
Project; whether it would avoid or substantially lessen any of the significant effects of the Project; and
whether the alternative is feasible, as defined by the CEQA Guidelines Section 15364, as being
"capable of being accomplished in a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into
account economic, environmental, legal, social and technological factors ".
No Project /Continuing Development
Description: Implementation of this alternative would involve continued development of the ARSP;
however, MEIR 313 would no longer be valid and all future development would be subject to
individual environmental reviews.
Environmental Effects: A full discussion of No Project/Continuing Development Alternative's
environmental impacts as compared to the Proposed Project is set forth in Section 6.3.1.1 of the Final
SEIR, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The No Project/Continuing Development Alternative
would avoid all environmental impacts associated with Project implementation; however, MEIR 313
would no longer be valid and all future development would be subject to individual environmental
reviews.
Ability to Achieve Project Objectives: When evaluating the desirability and feasibility of an
alternative, it is also important to evaluate the ability of the alternative to meet the Project objectives.
An alternative does not need to meet all of the Project objectives to be considered potentially feasible.
However, because future development projects cannot proceed, the No Project/Continuing
Development Alternative would not fully satisfy any of the Project Objectives:
• To maintain and encourage Anaheim's position as a nationally recognized tourist, convention,
and recreation center.
89
• To increase sales tax yields and further enhance the economic base of the community, thereby
lessening the tax burden on real property.
• To encourage the development of quality facilities which complement conventions, family
entertainment, and recreation within appropriate areas of the community.
• To maintain the integrity of the Commercial- Recreation and Public - Recreation Districts by
permitting only compatible land uses within these designated areas.
• To foster the growth of the City's economic potential by revitalizing The Anaheim Resort.
• To treat all landowners and users in The Anaheim Resort area fairly, while recognizing the
economic and social needs of the entire City.
• To ensure that development complements the City's investment in the Anaheim Convention
Center and other area resources and interests.
• To maintain and enhance existing recreation and convention - oriented land uses.
• To protect adjacent residential land uses by buffering them from land use impacts associated
with development of The Anaheim Resort.
• To maintain or enhance traffic and circulation in and around The Anaheim Resort.
• To provide convenient access to all hotel, restaurant, and retail opportunities in The Anaheim
Resort to enhance the areawide tourist experience.
• To protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from unnecessary intrusion by vehicles traveling
to and from The Anaheim Resort.
• To accommodate potential future regional transportation networks into the Plan.
• To provide for necessary public infrastructure and services to maximize the development
potential of The Anaheim Resort.
• To create a coherent, unique resort identity that reinforces the image of The Anaheim Resort as
a high - quality destination resort.
• To establish a high - quality pedestrian environment.
• To improve the aesthetic character of The Anaheim Resort by visually defining the boundaries
with appropriate landscape treatments.
Feasibility: This alternative is feasible; however, future development would not benefit from a streamlined
environmental review process, thus resulting in a more costly and less time - efficient development process.
In addition, development would not be subject to a consistent set of development standards to unify the
Resort Area. The development that has progressed to date under the adopted development standards for
the Specific Plan would not necessarily proceed as anticipated for one unified Area.
Finding: While this alternative would avoid the Project's significant impacts, as individual development
projects continue, it can be expected that similar impacts would occur on a cumulative basis. Therefore,
the No Project/Continuing Development Alternative would place the burden of future significant,
cumulative impacts on multiple, smaller projects. It would not achieve the objectives established for the
Project. In light of these considerations, the City finds that the proposed Project is preferred over this
alternative.
90
Modified Land Use Alternative
Description: The Modified Land Use Alternative, as analyzed in MEIR 313, assumed implementation and
build out of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan; however, the 6.8 -acre Hotel Circle Specific Plan would
be withdrawn, not approved, or not approved as proposed. Under this alternative, it was assumed that the
6.8 -acre property would be included as part of the ARSP which would permit development of up to 1,103
hotel units within the Hotel Circle Specific Plan area, which is the same density permitted under the Hotel
Circle Specific Plan. The total number of acres within the ARSP would increase to a total of 556.3.
Under current -day conditions, the Modified Land Use Alternative would not be feasible because the Hotel
Circle Specific Plan has been approved and development has occurred according to the specific plan.
Therefore, this alternative is not considered as an alternative to the currently Proposed Project and the City
does not make a finding.
Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A: Year 2000 Scenario
Description: The Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A: Year 2000 Scenario assumed that development
would be limited to implementation of the first stage of ARSP development (Year 2000). Specifically, the
alternative assumed that all approved hotel /motel development within the ARSP would be constructed by
Year 2000, which would include approximately 1,000 hotel rooms. Total build out of the ARSP under this
alternative would result in approximately 12,190 hotel rooms by Year 2000 (11,190 existing rooms [i.e., at
the time MEIR 313 was prepared] plus approximately 1,000 approved hotel rooms).
Approximately 11,587 hotel rooms and hotel room equivalents exist in the ARSP, which is slightly less
than the assumption for the Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A. Although the scenario year would
not be Year 2000, this alternative can be applied to the Proposed Project to represent a No Project/No
Development Alternative. No additional development would be allowed and full build -out would remain
as 11,587 hotel rooms and hotel room equivalents. Further, this alternative would not include expansion of
the PR District.
The purpose of describing and analyzing a no project alternative is to allow decision makers to compare
the impacts of approving the Project with the impacts of not approving the Project. Consistent with Section
15126.6(e)(3)(B) of the CEQA Guidelines, the Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A: Year 2000
Scenario is the circumstance under which the Project does not proceed. Under this alternative scenario, the
Project site remains in its existing condition and only previously approved development occurs at the site.
Therefore, this alternative addresses the Project in comparison to the existing condition, assuming no new
development.
Environmental Effects: A full discussion of the Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A: Year 2000
Scenario's environmental impacts, as compared to the proposed Project, is set forth in Section 6.3.3 of the
Final SEIR, which is hereby incorporated by reference. The Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A: Year
2000 Scenario would avoid all environmental impacts associated with Project implementation.
Ability to Achieve Project Objectives: This alternative would fail to achieve established objectives for the
Proposed Project related to increasing revenues and enhancing current conditions. Specifically,
implementation of this alternative would be inconsistent with the following 12 of the Project's 16
objectives.
91
• To maintain and encourage Anaheim's position as a nationally recognized tourist, convention,
and recreation center.
• To increase sales tax yields and further enhance the economic base of the community, thereby
lessening the tax burden on real property.
• To encourage the development of quality facilities which complement conventions, family
entertainment, and recreation within appropriate areas of the community.
• To foster the growth of the City's economic potential by revitalizing The Anaheim Resort.
• To treat all landowners and users in The Anaheim Resort fairly, while recognizing the
economic and social needs of the entire City.
• To ensure that development complements the City's investment in the Anaheim Convention
Center and other area resources and interests.
• To maintain and enhance existing recreation and convention oriented land uses.
• To maintain or enhance traffic and circulation in and around The Anaheim Resort.
• To provide convenient access to all hotel, restaurant, and retail opportunities in The Anaheim
Resort to enhance the area -wide tourist experience.
• To protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from unnecessary intrusion by vehicles traveling
to and from The Anaheim Resort.
• To accommodate potential future regional transportation networks into the Plan.
• To provide for necessary public infrastructure and services to maximize the development
potential of The Anaheim Resort.
Feasibility: This alternative is considered feasible as it appears to be capable of being accomplished in a
successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental, legal,
social, and technological factors; however, it would not achieve the overall purpose of the Project.
Finding: Overall, this alternative would avoid all potential impacts associated with the Project, both
positive and negative. However, this alternative would fail to achieve established objectives for the
Proposed Project related to increasing revenues and enhancing current conditions. This alternative would
not meet the fundamental tenets of the Project, being (1) the continued development in accordance with
the ARSP, as defined in MEIR 313 and (2) subsequent amendments and adjustments and expanding the
Anaheim Convention Center. In light of these considerations, the City finds that the proposed Project is
preferred over this alternative.
Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative B: Year 2008 Scenario
Description: Implementation of this alternative, as analyzed in MEIR 313, would allow for development
of up to 16,200 hotel rooms within the ARSP by Year 2008.
In comparison with the currently Proposed Project, this alternative would allow for development of up to
16,200 hotel rooms within the ARSP over a 14 -year period, with the build out year changing to Year 2024.
This is a net increase of 4,613 hotel rooms or hotel room equivalents over existing development. This
would be approximately 1/5 of the total allowable increase associated with the Proposed Project (20,913
92
hotel rooms or hotel room equivalents). The Project area would encompass the current ARSP area, which
has been expanded since certification of MEIR 313 and now includes approximately 581.3 acres. Further,
this alternative would not include expansion of the PR District.
Environmental Effects: A full discussion of this alternative's environmental impacts as compared to the
proposed Project is set forth in Section 6.3.4 of the Final SEIR, which is hereby incorporated by reference.
The Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative B: Year 2008 Scenario would result in similar impacts as the
Project to the following environmental factors: aesthetics, biological resources, cultural resources, geology
and soils, agriculture and forestry, cultural resources, hazardous materials, hydrology and water quality,
recreation, and traffic.
This alternative would have an incremental reduction of impacts compared to the Project in the following
areas:
• Air Quality —The duration of construction activities associated with this alternative would be
reduced due to the overall reduction in development. Mitigation measures similar to those
identified throughout the Draft SEIR would be required; however, impacts related to daily
construction emissions would continue to potentially exceed established air pollutant criteria
because the daily construction activities are assumed to be similar to the Proposed Project and
would just occur over a shorter duration due to fewer construction projects. This alternative
would result in a significant and unavoidable impact which is consistent with the Proposed
Project.
Long -term air quality impacts would be similar to the Proposed Project since the proposed uses
would be similar and the amount of daily traffic would not be substantially reduced (refer to
Transportation and Traffic discussion, below). Mitigation measures similar to those identified
throughout the Draft SEIR would be required; however, it is expected that impacts would remain
significant and unavoidable which is consistent with the Proposed Project
• Greenhouse Gas Emissions — Implementation of this alternative would result in development
of the same types of urban uses as would the Proposed Project; however, the overall density of
development within the ARSP would be reduced. Impacts associated with Greenhouse Gas
Emissions associated with use of the hotel rooms (i.e., lighting, heating, and cooling) would be
reduced due to the overall reduction in scale between the Proposed Project and this alternative.
However, because it is reasonable to assume that the overall demand for hotel rooms would
remain fairly consistent, the GHG emissions may be displaced outside of the ARSP area, but
would still occur within the region. There would be an incremental decrease associated with
reduction in housing required to accommodate the additional workers (see Population and
Housing discussion, below). It should be noted that, since the majority of GHG emissions are
due to vehicular emissions, the assumption that the amount of daily traffic would not be
substantially reduced under this alternative (refer to Transportation/Traffic discussion, below)
means that vehicular emissions would be similar to the Proposed Project. Mitigation measures
similar to those identified throughout the Draft SEIR would be required; however, it is
expected that impacts would remain significant and unavoidable, which is consistent with the
Proposed Project.
• Land Use and Planning— Implementation of this alternative would result in development of
the same types of urban uses as would the Proposed Project. Development would be consistent
93
with the current general plan and the ARSP. Land use impacts associated with future ARSP
development would be anticipated to be less than those identified for the Proposed Project
because the reduction in development would reduce potential opportunities for land use
incompatibilities. Similar to the Proposed Project, this alternative would result in less than
significant impacts related to land use and planning.
• Noise — The duration of construction noise associated with this alternative would be reduced
due to the overall reduction in development. Mitigation measures similar to those identified
throughout the Draft SEIR would be required; however, impacts related to construction would
continue to potentially exceed established noise criteria, thereby resulting in a significant and
unavoidable impact, which is consistent with the Proposed Project.
Long -term noise impacts would be similar to the Proposed Project since the types of proposed
uses would be similar and the amount of daily traffic would not be significantly reduced.
Mitigation measures similar to those identified throughout the Draft SEIR would be required,
which would reduce impacts related to long -term operations to less than significant levels.
• Population and Housing This alternative would generate approximately 4,152 jobs, which
represents an approximately 78 percent decrease from the Proposed Project. The decrease in
job creation would result in a decreased housing demand and a reduced population increase
when compared to the Proposed Project. Impacts related to housing and population would be
reduced in comparison to the Proposed Project. The housing and population impacts of this
alternative and the Proposed Project would be less than significant.
• Public Services and Utilities — The reduction in allowable development would result in a
decreased demand for public services and utilities. As discussed throughout the Draft SEIR, no
significant impacts on public services and utilities would occur after mitigation except for
potential cumulative impacts related to storm water facilities. Impacts associated with this
alternative would be similar because the same physical area would be subject to development.
Due the reduced number of hotel rooms allowed, it is assumed that the amount of pervious
surface associated with this alternative may be reduced in comparison to the Proposed Project.
However, similar mitigation measures would be required to those identified throughout the
Draft SEIR, resulting in an overall reduction in consumption and demand for public services
and utilities, which would, in turn, reduce impacts to levels less than significant except for
impacts to storm water facilities. Similar to the Proposed Project, the City of Anaheim cannot
control storm water discharges from outside its jurisdictional boundaries. Because storm water
flows from Anaheim enter into regional facilities, any contribution that the City of Anaheim
makes has the potential to exceed capacity of regional facilities due to the volumes contributed
by other jurisdictions. Although storm water flows may be reduced due to a reduced level of
development and associated amount of impervious surface areas, this cumulative impact would
remain significant as with the Proposed Project.
• Recreation — The reduction in allowable development would result in a decreased demand for
public services, including indirect impacts to recreational and park facilities. Similar to the
Proposed Project, no significant impacts on recreation would occur assuming adherence to the
standard requirements, which requires provision of parkland to the City of Anaheim and /or the
payment of fees, consistent with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.250.
94
• Transportation and Traffic— Development of this alternative would reduce impacts related to
traffic based on an overall reduction in vehicle trips associated with hotel uses. However,
development of this alternative would not alter the visitor demand for local tourist attractions,
such as the Anaheim Convention Center and The Disneyland Resort. Rather, it is possible that
an increased amount of vehicular traffic may occur within the ARSP area due to the lack of
adequate, local hotel and motel accommodations to house visitors and encourage pedestrian
travel from one attraction to another. Visitors would be forced to find alternative
accommodations outside the ARSP, which would increase traffic flow into the area on a daily
basis. Therefore, impacts associated with this alternative would be similar to the Proposed
Project and would be significant and unavoidable.
Ability to Achieve Project Objectives: This alternative would not support all of the identified Project
objectives. Implementation of this alternative would result in the elimination of expansion of development
within the PR District and would be inconsistent with the following nine objectives of the Proposed
Project's sixteen objectives.
• To maintain and encourage Anaheim's position as a nationally recognized tourist, convention,
and recreation center.
• To increase sales tax yields and further enhance the economic base of the community, thereby
lessening the tax burden on real property.
• To encourage the development of quality facilities which complement conventions, family
entertainment, and recreation within appropriate areas of the community.
• To foster the growth of the City's economic potential by revitalizing The Anaheim Resort.
• To ensure that development complements the City's investment in the Anaheim Convention
Center and other area resources and interests.
• To maintain and enhance existing recreation and convention - oriented land uses.
• To maintain or enhance traffic and circulation in and around The Anaheim Resort.
• To provide convenient access to all hotel, restaurant, and retail opportunities in The Anaheim
Resort to enhance the areawide tourist experience.
• To protect adjacent residential neighborhoods from unnecessary intrusion by vehicles traveling
to and from The Anaheim Resort.
Feasibility: This alternative is considered feasible as it appears to be capable of being accomplished in
a successful manner within a reasonable period of time, taking into account economic, environmental,
legal, social, and technological factors; however, it would not achieve the overall purpose of the
project.
Finding: While this alternative would lessen some of the environmental effects of the proposed
Project, it would not eliminate the significant and unavoidable impacts related to aesthetics, short- and
long -term air quality emissions, greenhouse gas emissions, short-term noise impacts,
transportation/traffic impacts, cumulative stormwater impacts identified for the proposed Project.
While this alternative is feasible, because it would not eliminate the significant and unavoidable
95
impacts, would not meet all project objectives, and would generally result in similar to slightly reduced
environmental impacts, the City finds that the proposed Project is preferred over this alternative.
96
6. STATEMENT OF OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS
Introduction
The City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency under CEQA for preparation, review, and certification of the
Final SEIR for the Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project. As the Lead
Agency, the City is also responsible for determining the potential environmental impacts of the
proposed action and which of those impacts are significant, and which can be mitigated through
imposition of mitigation measures to avoid or minimize those impacts to a level of less than
significant. CEQA then requires the Lead Agency to balance the benefits of a proposed action against
its significant unavoidable adverse environmental impacts in determining whether or not to approve
the proposed Project. In making this determination the City is guided by CEQA Guidelines Section
15093 which provides as follows:
CEQA requires the decision - making agency to balance, as applicable, the economic,
legal, social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide
environmental benefits, of a proposed project against its unavoidable environmental
risks when determining whether to approve the project. If the specific economic, legal,
social, technological, or other benefits, including region -wide or statewide
environmental benefits, of a proposal (sic) project outweigh the unavoidable adverse
environmental effects, the adverse environmental effects may be considered
"acceptable."
When the lead agency approves a project which will result in the occurrence of
significant effects which are identified in the final EIR but are not avoided or
substantially lessened, the agency shall state in writing the specific reasons to support
its action based on the final EIR and/or other information in the record. The statement
of overriding considerations shall be supported by substantial evidence in the record.
If an agency makes a statement of overriding considerations, the statement should be
included in the record of the project approval and should be mentioned in the notice of
determination. This statement does not substitute for, and shall be in addition to,
findings required pursuant to Section 15091.
In addition, Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) requires that where a public agency finds that
specific economic, legal, social, technological, or other considerations, including considerations for the
provision of employment opportunities for highly trained workers, make infeasible the mitigation
measures or alternatives identified in an EIR and thereby leave significant unavoidable effects, the
public agency must also find that overriding economic, legal, social, technological, or other benefits of
the project outweigh the significant effects of the project.
Pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 21081(b) and the CEQA Guidelines Section 15093, the
City has balanced the benefits of the proposed Project against the following unavoidable adverse
impact associated with the proposed Project and has adopted all feasible mitigation measures with
respect to this impact. The City also has examined alternatives to the proposed Project, none of which
97
both meet the Project objectives and is environmentally preferable to the proposed Project for the
reasons discussed in the Section 5 of these Findings.
The City of Anaheim, the Lead Agency for this Project, and having reviewed the Final SEIR for the
Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project, and reviewed all written materials
within the City's public record and heard all oral testimony presented at public hearings, adopts this
Statement of Overriding Considerations, which has balanced the benefits of the Project against its
significant unavoidable adverse environmental impact in reaching its decision to approve the Project.
Significant Unavoidable Adverse Environmental Impacts
Although most potential Project impacts have been substantially avoided or mitigated, as described in
the Findings, there remains nine Project impacts for which complete mitigation is not feasible. For
these impacts, mitigation measures were identified and adopted by the Lead Agency where
appropriate, however, even with implementation of the measures, the City finds that the impacts
cannot be reduced to a level of less than significant. The impacts and alternatives are described below
and were also addressed in the Findings.
The EIR identified the following unavoidable adverse impact of the proposed Project:
Aesthetics
1. Buildout of the C -R District has the potential to introduce structures which may create a
significant shade and shadow impact on surrounding properties, which may result in
a significant and unavoidable impact.
Air Quality
1. Construction emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) and long -term operational
emissions of VOC, nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), respirable particulate
matter with a diameter less than 10 microns (PM10), and fine particulate matter with a diameter
less than 2.5 microns (PM 2.5) would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District
(SCAQMD) CEQA significance thresholds and the impact would be significant and
unavoidable. Local PM10 and PM2.5 emissions would exceed the SCAQMD CEQA
significance thresholds for short-term periods when excavation would occur near sensitive
receptors; the impact would be significant and unavoidable.
2. Build out of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) would result in long -term emissions of
VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 that would exceed the SCAQMD CEQA significance
thresholds, resulting in a potentially cumulatively considerable contribution to existing
occasional ozone, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), PM10, and PM2.5 standard violations. Therefore,
the Proposed Project would have a significant cumulative air quality impact. The
implementation of the proposed mitigation would reduce vehicle emissions of nonattainment
pollutants, but the reductions would be relatively small compared to the total magnitude of the
emissions and would not reduce emissions to less than the SCAQMD CEQA thresholds.
Therefore, the impact would be significant and unavoidable.
98
3. Short-term exposure of persons to PM10 and PM2.5 concentrations exceeding the SCAQMD
CEQA significance thresholds would occur during excavation near sensitive receptors; the
impact would be significant and unavoidable.
4. The Proposed Project would conflict with the applicable air quality plan; the impact would be
significant and unavoidable.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions
1. Direct and indirect GHG emissions would be cumulatively considerable and would create a
significant impact. GHG reductions would be achieved with implementation, at the statewide
level, of the measures described in Section 5.6.2 of the Draft SEIR. Additional GHG reductions
would be achieved with implementation of the proposed mitigation measures; however, these
impacts would remain cumulatively considerable and would be significant and unavoidable.
Noise
1. Construction activities associated with future development within the ARSP have the potential
to significantly impact noise - sensitive receptors. Adherence to the standard requirements and
implementation of the proposed mitigation measures would reduce potential impacts; however,
these impacts would remain significant and unavoidable.
Transportation and Traffic
1. Within the Cities of Anaheim and Orange and within California Department of Transportation
(Caltrans) facilities, the Proposed Project would have the potential to cause intersections, arterial
segments, freeway ramp termini intersections, freeway ramps, freeway mainlines, and freeway
weaving areas to operate at unacceptable levels of service (LOS). Because all needed roadway
and intersection improvements within the City of Anaheim may not be feasible for reasons
discussed in Section 5.14, Transportation and Traffic of the Draft SEIR, traffic- related impacts in
the City of Anaheim would be significant and unavoidable. The Proposed Project's contribution
to traffic volumes and levels of service at intersections in the City of Orange and at freeway
ramps and mainlines are considered significant and unavoidable since the City has no jurisdiction
over the necessary improvements at these locations. Even with compliance with the standard
requirements and implementation of the proposed mitigation measures, potential impacts related
to transportation and traffic would remain significant and unavoidable.
Storm Water
1. Future growth under the Proposed Project will require the implementation of new or modified
storm water drainage facilities that would connect to existing utility systems provided by the
City of Anaheim and other agencies. All new growth within the ARSP area would occur in
compliance with mitigation measures provided in the Draft SEIR; however, the City has no
control over the growth and storm water contributions of areas outside of its jurisdiction. Any
addition of storm water to the regional storm water system may be cumulatively considerable
when combined with potential storm water flow increases from surrounding jurisdictions.
Therefore, mitigation of these impacts would be outside of the City's jurisdiction, and the
potential cumulative impact could be significant and unavoidable if development in the
surrounding jurisdictions occurs without upgrades to the storm water infrastructure
The Draft SEIR identified four alternatives to the Project and analyzed whether these alternatives could
avoid or substantially lessen the unavoidable environmental impacts of the proposed Project. While
99
some of the alternatives could lessen or avoid the unavoidable impacts of the proposed Project, none
the alternatives achieved all of the Project Objectives set forth for the Project, consequently, for the
reasons set forth in Section 5 of these Findings, none of the alternatives were determined to be
preferable to the proposed Project:
• No- Project/Continuing Development
• Modified Land Use Alternative: Includes incorporating the Hotel Circle Specific Plan area into
the Project Area
• Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative A
• Lower Intensity Land Use Alternative B
The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits
including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of the Proposed Project, has determined
that the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified above may be considered acceptable
due to specific considerations which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse environmental impacts of the
Proposed Project, each of which standing alone is sufficient to support approval of the Project, in
accordance with CEQA Section 21081(b) and State CEQA Guideline Section 15093.
MEIR 313 Statement of Overriding Considerations
A Statement of Overriding Considerations was adopted for MEIR 313. The following overriding
considerations of economic, legal, social, technological or other benefits were prepared for the original
adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. These benefits were determined to outweigh the
Project's adverse environmental effects and justified approval of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and
certification of MEIR 313.
Increased Revenues for City, County and State
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will produce substantial beneficial fiscal impacts. The Project will
directly generate significant revenues in property taxes, sales taxes, hotel taxes, and miscellaneous
taxes and fees to the City of Anaheim, County of Orange and State of California.
Evidence of the substantial fiscal benefits of the Project has been documented by the City (see, e.g.
EPS 1993). This evidence confirms that the economic benefits of the Project will include substantial
net increases in municipal revenues from the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area. The net funds
accruing to the City will be available to pay for enhanced services and infrastructure facilities
throughout the City. Additionally, the Project crease economic benefits from induced economic
activity in the City and the surrounding region; however, these multiplier effects are somewhat
speculative, and have not been calculated in the fiscal analysis.
Enhancement of Tourism
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan will improve and enhance the Southern California tourist industry,
an industry of immense importance at the local, regional, and state levels. The Anaheim Area Visitor
and Convention Bureau (VCB), which tracks the county's tourists, estimated that 40 million people
100
visited the Convention Center, the area's theme parks and beaches in 1993. The Bureau estimated that
the visitors spent $4.8 billion in Orange County in 1993 (VCB, June 1994). The Orange county region
and the city of Anaheim benefit greatly from these revenues. In 1992, the Governor's Council on
California Competitiveness published "California's Jobs and Future." The report identified the tourism
industry as a key industry in the State of California and urged "extraordinary efforts' be made to
preserve and enhance the competitiveness of such industries.
The Anaheim Resort (previously names the Commercial Recreation Area) has been an important and
vital source of revenue, jobs, and prestige for the City of Anaheim, with the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan area providing a major portion of the convention facilities and lodging for tourists in the area.
However, to maintain its vital role in the economy, it is necessary to reinvest in the area to support the
uses in and around The Anaheim Resort enabling it to evolve to meet current market demands for a
newer, upgraded resort area toward longer visitor stays. This reinvestment and revitalization is also
necessary to allow the Anaheim Convention Center to retain its status as one of the major West Coast
convention facilities. Without the infrastructure facilities, landscaping /identity enhancements and
development opportunities created by the Project, the area and its tax, convention and tourism base
will decline.
Provision of Visual Amenities
The Anaheim Resort currently presents a visually confusing identity due to an abundance of large
signs, varying architectural quality, the presence of overhead utilities, and lack of consistent
landscaping. The Design Plan within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides landscape standards
for the setback areas and along public streets that pass through the center of the Specific Plan area in
order to reinforce the area's identity. The primary concept of the Design Plan is to transform the visual
character of The Anaheim Resort with landscape. The primary concept of the streetscape, which will
include trees and shrubs, as well as man-made amenities such as light fixtures, benches, entry
gateways, and appropriate signage. Streets and their edges provide the primary space in which
landscape can be placed to transform the identity of The Anaheim Resort. The Design Plan will be a
major factor contributing toward the visual unification of the area.
Provision for Needed Infrastructure Improvements
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan makes provision for needed infrastructure improvements. Much of
the area's current infrastructure (roads, sewer lines, storm drains, etc.) is old and very near, if not over,
capacity. The planned area improvements provided under the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are
proposed to include transportation, storm drain, wastewater, and water system upgrades. These
improvements are planned to be coordinated with development within the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan area, as well as the approved Disneyland Resort and proposed Hotel Circle Specific Plan area.
The infrastructure improvements would be accomplished through a variety of financial mechanisms,
including mitigation measures, developer fees, utility hook -up charges, and potentially a contribution
from the net hotel tax revenues to the City. Proposed improvements will be phased to coincide with
the area needs as individual developments are proposed. Enhanced police, fire, and other public
services will also be provided in coordination with the pace of development in the area. Without the
coordination, planning and implementation measures provided in connection with the Project, these
improvements would not be provided; or at best, would be provided to a lesser extent and in a less
coordinated manner.
101
Enhancement of Commercial - Recreation Area Synergy
The Commercial Recreation land use designation was created by the City of Anaheim to provide for
development related to the recreation and entertainment industries that provide services to area visitors
and tourists. This land use designation is present in The Anaheim Resort, as well as the Anaheim
Stadium area (referred to as the "Platinum Triangle "). The development and enhancement of the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area will increase the synergy in the area from which all of the area
major attractions (Anaheim Convention Center, Disneyland, Anaheim Stadium (Angel Stadium of
Anaheim), The Arrowhead Pond at Anaheim (Honda Center)) will benefit. For example, it is
anticipated that hotel and motel development pursuant to the Project will accommodate overnight
guests to all of the foregoing attractions, thereby increasing their length of stay in the area and reducing
vehicular travel. Without the additional hotel /motel development capacity created by the Project,
guests and visitors to these attractions will be forced to use more distant and less convenient
accommodations, or else forego overnight stays in favor of more frequent day trips.
Enhancement of the Pedestrian Environment
An objective of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Design Plan is to "...create a high - quality pedestrian
environment that reinforces the urban character of the Specific Plan area." Anticipated construction of
The Disneyland Resort and improvements to the Anaheim Convention Center will create a significant
increase in pedestrians in the area. The pedestrian movement will contribute to increased street
activity for shopping, dining, lodging, and walking visits to the theme parks and Anaheim Convention
Center. The Specific Plan will enhance and accommodate the pedestrian environment by providing
landscaped parkways, ornamental street features and other design elements which will enhance the
safety and visual appeal of the pedestrian environment.
Streamlined Entitlement Procedure
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR will allow for reduced and/or streamlined environmental
review for future development within the Specific Plan area. The EIR will serve as a "project" EIR
with respect to the infrastructure program and other development within the scope and conditions
anticipated by the EIR. For development projects which do not come within the conditions and
parameters analyzed in the EIR, the EIR will serve as a Master EIR, from which aspects of the
environmental analysis of the Project which remain relevant can be taken in order to reduce the scope
of further analysis. The preparation and certification of the EIR will greatly reduce the cost and time
required to process a development project within the Specific Plan area, and therefore will promote the
City's goals of job growth and economic revitalization for the area.
Enhancement and Maintenance of Anaheim's Position as a World - Class Tourist Destination
In response to market pressures to expand and upgrade The Anaheim Resort, the City of Anaheim has
prepared the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to provide for enhanced public improvements and
development standards. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, in conjunction with the specific plans for
the Disneyland Resort and Hotel Circle, will provide a high - quality development standard that will
greatly enhance the viability of The Anaheim Resort and maintain Anaheim's positions as one of the
country's premiere vacation destinations. Without the Project, the lack of development capacity and
the lack of coordinated infrastructure and development planning will cause the area to decline in
visitation and economic viability.
102
Facilitation and Implementation of the General Plan
The Anaheim Resort Specific enables the City of Anaheim to further its achievement of the overall
objectives established in the General Plan, as well as the goals and policies provided in each of the
General Plan elements. The four main objectives are furthered by the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan in
the following manner:
• General Community Objective 1 — Maintain and enhance the residential environment of
Anaheim's living area.
Implementation: This objective will be furthered through development of setback areas,
landscaped buffers between the Specific Plan and residential properties, and increased setbacks
from multi -story buildings.
• General Community Objective 2 — Maintain and enhance Anaheim as a regional, cultural, and
employment center by diversifying and enhancing the economic base of the community.
Implementation: The Specific Plan was written to enhance The Anaheim Resort as an urban
destination and create a resort environment. By creating more attractions, lodging, dining
facilities, and shopping opportunities, jobs will be created, and visitors will be encourages to
stay for several days or more and enjoy the variety of the recreational and entertainment
opportunities that are available, thereby enhancing the City of Anaheim's economic base. With.
Buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area, an estimated 18,116 jobs will be created,
plus substantial employment in the construction sector.
• General Community Objective 3 — Maintain and encourage Anaheim 's positions as a
nationally recognized tourist, convention, and recreation center.
Implementation: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan recognizes this General Community
Objective as the major purpose of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, by enhancing the
attractiveness of the area as a family- oriented tourist and convention destination center. The
Specific Plan encourages development oriented toward tourist- and convention - related events
while complementing and protecting the adjacent residential uses. The Plan provides a long -
range plan to create a cohesive and unique resort character and to maintain and enhance the
existing commercial- recreation land uses.
• General Community Objective 4 — Provide all working, living and recreation area with a full
range of community facilities and services.
Implementation: An objective of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is to improve public
infrastructure, services, and facilities to accommodate the growth and development that is
planned in the Specific Plan area. Additionally, the Anaheim Resort will be complemented
with a "...full range of community facilities and services" which will be upgraded and
enhanced as development of the area proceeds.
103
Deterrence of Negative Impacts of the No- Project /Continuing Development Alternative
Without adoption of the Project, commercial properties in The Anaheim Resort would continue to
develop on a parcel -by- parcel basis without an identity program, enhanced design and development
standards, or coordinated infrastructure planning. The piecemeal development that would occur, in
conjunction with the loss of municipal revenues that would be realized with development in the area,
would significantly detract from the attractiveness and economic vitality of the area.
Given the current economic situation, adequate public funds will not be available for capital
infrastructure improvements. The result of preventing improvements and reinvestment to the area may
be severe. Without reinvestment and maintenance, existing businesses may close and new
development would be inhibited. It is reasonable to assume that a halt in investment and improvement
would result in further decline in the attractiveness and thus a decline in visits to the area. This in turn
results in a further decline in the attractiveness and deterioration of the infrastructure and economic
viability of the area.
Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project
The benefits listed above for MEIR 313 and the adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
continue to be applicable to the Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Project.
Since the adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, The Anaheim Resort has been transformed
through streetscape and pedestrian improvements, a coordinated sign program and the construction and
refurbishment of many hotels and restaurants. The Anaheim Convention Center has been improved and
expanded, becoming both LEED - certified and the largest convention center on the west coast.
In the adjacent Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area, Disney's California Adventure Theme Park,
Downtown Disney, Disney's Grand California Hotel and Anaheim GardenWalk have been constructed
and continually improved, along with ongoing improvements to the Disneyland Theme Park. The
coordination between the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan have
resulted in The Anaheim Resort becoming a visually consistent and vibrant, multi -day destination.
The Platinum Triangle, which includes Angels Stadium, Honda Center and the City National Grove of
Anaheim, was designed to be complementary to The Anaheim Resort to enhance synergy between
these two commercial- recreation areas. Planned and constructed streetscape improvements along
Katella Avenue are intended to create this cohesive experience. Current transportation improvements,
such extension of Gene Autry Way and Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center
(ARTIC), as well as, and future transportation initiatives, such as Anaheim Rapid Transit (ARC) will
continue this synergy.
The increase in development intensity analyzed for the Anaheim Convention Center will allow this
facility to expand over time to meet diverse and competitive convention and meeting space
requirements. In addition, there are a number of hotels and restaurants within The Anaheim Resort at
various stages in the development process. While some of these projects are currently undergoing
independent environmental review, approval of the proposed project would allow similar projects, as
well as future projects, to move forward with streamlined environmental review and clear, well -
defined development standards. Hotel and restaurant development that meet Code requirements, as
determined by a Final Site Plan application, will not be subject to discretionary approval. This will
104
expedite a property owner's ability to move forward with development of his or her property and likely
save the property owner both time and money.
The City, after balancing the specific economic, legal, social, technological, and other benefits
including region -wide or statewide environmental benefits, of the Proposed Project, has determined
that the unavoidable adverse environmental impacts identified by Final SEIR 340 may be considered
acceptable due to the foregoing specific considerations which outweigh the unavoidable, adverse
environmental impacts of the Proposed Project, each of which standing alone is sufficient to support
approval of the Project, in accordance with CEQA Section 21081(b) and State CEQA Guideline
Section 15093.
105
EXHIBIT "B"
MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 85C
[Behind this sheet.]
106
�� ' • U ' b U 'b .'.s �� • �, A wn -0 O .`'+
.F+ to p . i 0 I • r o T o 5 ° �/N • V o
o 'er aQ 0 U° 0. 0 o 0 E g 0,
cd •~ 4-+ F. U 0 U p
4 t. y ca U 0 v • ~ y ° bA
G 3 t N • 1 • tO � '.� , 0 'b
• U E 5 b 0 0)) N y. ^C ��
U p O" O �, td U '� U w p O • a 2
-- -0 4 .
V V i-, � E al g 0,0 O U. 'Z' 'b ' � , U Sr' .r
00 �" a, .. g 0 1 .. y o~ :� o, .� '0 U 0
a•, U. U 5, 4-+ U il .. U U 0 O * + Q
~ 0 ° .0 0. 8 2
U
44 0 rn °r `i' o - No o 0 CU-
,� 04 0 . `n 0 •~ - p v "0 • 0 IL .. 0
O �,, U "0 o O ;tiI 0 TS Ato C4 u � . 0) 0 0 ti U °
E.* °' a U o o p � .� o i e o 0 0 0.0
W f�
O � >' �, � `�' � °" 0 °' �� o o c moo
;,-, O ~ O '' U ' O
o ° o� o a' 4 a,.= •,-A 03 0 '
O • 0 yam 0 0 a,° -� � , N
° ° y "' U O O U U b 4 p a) N 0" 17.
o
� ° X - rte 5 a) o x �' a; a' oo �o J
O� ° •° o • tu
a) v o 0 . °A w . b 0 2 0 0,15E 0 4) 0 •° U 75
W • A O oL cd . - p E 0 o o -c cc! ..0(480(4:1 0 0'
� , a,
C64 6 a _Ub U p,.0 0 'y
•°o • N o a U ° C a a, • ° a' 6 cd
.t ° o . .. a. a) o ° 4 on •o - 0 c 0 o
U 0 ' 0 ; 2 0 1 5 . ',�'' �---� 0 0° 2 a, 1=1. w . E
. e .... g . 0 -0 , .� a� I~ o o a� a ,
c 3 cel 0 o.: o 04 4 c, O 0 ° o
v O w , � Vi c a o . 2 o 0., 0
8 a a F" W O
1.H ..7.. 3• o U Ix t- !H.
U U L� 0, o
GO
c• c+i 4
1
i
S
1
0 0 5 4 4
. . r i I -i t .
0 A � 0 0A
cu 1 GI OA OA
a a a co co a aQ
0 0 b y ti >' to 4 4 d 5 -a p 0 v a
•b a a c s E a - '� '. 3 .b tn
7c1 E
2 bA w
o.a ° 3� oc,.., 'b:b o w° 0 i -m ob'"' � a a
WI 0 CO cu cs1 ,G v, N 4 I . 0 • -..0 O 'ct o b
E , c°d0.. 0' o � aa- = = z 0—`n - ' U o 0 g E -0 " >' a o i
• el 0 o� �� '" a 5 . 0. - v) t
0 sz.
p y O O cd I § A N
G� ' •C y f ed ti .d rn c� Q O a) (n > a O O E N 1 O O N
"d d . v� 3 0 a 0 O . O R. a: cz . — . ".' N • r=' tz O 0 C c . 6 �... to • C ' b L l. cd pp y � a Q . O *1:i
et '+'+
et a . O » :D a) ›.(-11 ' p p . C O tai p N C �1 �� vi O Q " y
C , w eb .� o
.--I c �›' '4 '' E > , • '� O En ti O r by w 0 o
°' b O . y ° > 0 cC) .b @ N ... ' N b y i d .0 •b ' Q �"''
. c� Oo 0 > .5.5 O C 0 �— i 0a 3 .a
p C +- O a� v t .,, y C
' o > c, � › ''oh0' ° o i tll
P. cn z. cl o cn.5 0,� a. t+.. as p O 0 C1r co.0 tF. o = cz ad 0 n
b
g to
E.,
-1 :-
8 ..,.
, .,_
VD
a
w r • on to w
w c
0> Si) 0 0> 0ao
0 ob 0 00 0
.. Cl., o a ,. °
a cco r Z O ass aN
z
U
1E- ,,; ,,;
i
•
a
0
U
I . a a 0 a a a a °
t g
ct t g
ct 1 1
�AAAQ � A I ca g
CV
o ° C: Q
00 00
Q O O a C: ° 0 0
a� a a ao a� am am F. 57.: 02
o= '� v im + 4 03 = o U �, w ,p ' •N 0 cn
Si b ' u 0 i >0 _ • 0 C .0 . . CI) o C - o N b . , 6, o 0 a ° ... = 2 >,
• c p . d a) Z C3. . -, • • 0 b d ' v, c 0 �� U -d GL ."
r/� o o Q O 1 v, �, �' o o �. o -d I.F fi .45
c O w v; . 130 ccd y � v, U " 0 . , a, '+, b us. = ° cd .g v, c�
Q' � '� � o A�'o . .no ��„ �>' o.�4)s.,o `d 0, ono.
3 m v Q"c - d °�'
,. b I. N . cN o' o w o . o >, '�' c N
CI .� M a) cd cd "" >, ' C1, ti O. p +� t,p . c
O c
O V, .5,b 3 b 0 , .t-' E bA E' 0 = 0 ' O 0 +' ° 0 �. „ g
O C 0 C0 a, o - , - 0 0 D . y — "C +.+ "0 0 b
C c ... A 4 0 u.
el V N o N ed of) a, Q Q . ' U "C "O CL y . cd u, 'b O
O '0 3 00 co 8 O .a 0 .5 3 s 0 ,.a o o o 'b v o w
1.6 C 0 b a 0 o �" -c C -° b= ' 5 cA ° C c 0 '0 0-4
^' b to o o "0 o o a, ed a`d a, U a, a, o o ; i5 ed Ct E o
Z b 4 ° • N 0 0 �' 0 y w O w .o �'' j �A O .. �*" 4 b
CIO 4. o "d ° a, >, - - cn y .0 z eel g 0' O O o a, E
, � w o ,0 0 .2 =0 g cdo Ned "o .ti y4 aC,.CU " >
a w a, w 0. . a, 0 • o C: L I. v, yr)
1:11) cn 8
ca
rn o o o w. .0 o w� 4 ` 'bim
Q 0 id . ° —, 0 0 -0 d
ti) r di) ^d 'b 0 .. OA °' c • ° d oA . 0 ' + '0 ° . °' 0 .0 ° , O ...
a 0 a y.�.c 3 O o"o a 0"d O a a '4 p: o �Q o a� ° o.
"C "o
0
g
b 0 0
L
o
i� � 0
.. ° ° � v�
U U
w ' o w . 5 00 ' i ,. Tt
o ,� o � • -, 0 o o o o o
,. . a �. C: o 0 0 +.. b b 1. °
aN fa. NI O O c° c o a ¢'
'C o r. o a .o a .o a 0 cc
al
O N M
�C t
--- CO CT
Vii .-1, .--, r: .. — "
• '` V' V' V'; V1 N V1 cii V1
A i i i i X
a
•
a
U'
t t t
cdA gA g A
A + ac c . E . b 5c
X 'o�o �
_ 'E 45
a aa ao a ao�o
° 0 w on
E a ° 4 6
° o o . o cl E= __ ••-
.) • 5,/ ° N 0
° 6 o a. . . °
at
o X 0 0 -o 9 • .. O a N a • tu 0 o . = g
a ° ) o c ° 4 0
Q a) ci, c N ir, E-' op v; Cl.) a > • ' ca 'g a.
v 0. '0 -"� N �6,,c on '�� 4,:t; 'g • v i -0 a. O Z.' c ' 0 — Q b O O O w ..= . O a. �
N o � ss,o.- •o .. 0 .� . °3 .7)
A im `v - ,,' .a 'A ° = VI v i ••d ° ° 0 b y v i i C 3 ° "" co
CD 7d et o° 8 .5 0 " j, ov)'b` c 5 � o� 0o� v0
o �'' .. p b O Q i " w 0 w 4- , • = N o o o U • ° U o o a . o 0. 03
er cd O .0 0 P �C 0. ° 2 O VI a) ° o " - c • n - , " 0 � , 0 > . 0.
0 ' s ° .-' 0 0 i c.. o o c 0....>_, ° �' 0 o 0 is 4 o k
Z a" _02. o o °� ° a ° ° • ° w 0"° to � O c4 7.-, — > .0 = o ° = , 0 •
v y a) ° q . a � c > = = r o a) a 0 4.
a cn ;.o t ba cd ° a v '> 2 .0 ° 3 ° �i ° c o a) .� •••, a) N E 4)
a, °)o . °E'z �°oHN -o° o° o o •z$.4 cd�E
o ° v E ° v" '° = ° o c- > ° c d ° a ° y v o - d v) ..�
v o � o co o2g.20 o Q b 0 0 0 Z •
El Q+ 0 > O •o IDA 0 a ti b a v v 03 CO 0 v O O
° O
a
5 - d °•^. -0
�b
° > a.� o v
ij 0 0 co ,.
0 O., bA° ° c) o rA
a o a s O 0
0
6
- N N N
i i
1
U
111
o �= o a� �' o o -° Cl) o ci
0
ct
cn
p" N bbA k U. C. 8 . d 0 cd ° e en U Q a
� .. �° `�� ate b - a •
a .. U b • o +, to
G C.) 0.•
c0 o a $ "0 o • v. c 0 0 `0 O C ty bo
C cd � t� 'n N 'CS 4? o ° U•� 4 0 b61) O • c bU 1.0 U • WI �, c� U RI U U v k cd "C +-' v) C s.. 3 c U Q cd
G4 a~ b y ..`4.8 � °�' 00 o ct ° 0"d cis
'� y 0 a) Q 8 E ^d . ~ O '. a C U • •. ° ..w +j bq N. c r, U U
o CI �n v) o 3 0 °'d "6 ° ° a (f) i
L') o - o by> �°`�
0 ° N U o cd o 0 O. �' 0 o >0. . E . U cd v; .. b cn
Z > . ° 0.o k U a 5 . ". a , s
csi 0 3
i+ > U . by `. b y ci ti k " U w V , O . tz ° 0 ', +' E- o U 3 U
CI a� o -w ° . ". v; cd ° E' 3 t v - 8 to 5 8 o a N ,
� � � CC U b 'C N U C h ( > a = 'C .. O. it Ti 5 • � . cd a
2 to o c o o o•bn� o � • ` � a r �n U o
wc`� ;2 :8 ayw 5 0 F E-
U 1
Q ..6 ti •o ai W bb .. • " ... ....
V
4
as
. , ,.,
. i
Z
m
s i
II
c
U
o a> a
o >
a i• t g
. AAA
o-o Q -- o.
p., a- CO am
-
0 .rc° 0. o a. a
o �, � ssN� „ a>
eF , a _ a? a o � o o > , o.Na> or ocG . d
0 0 o b
3 . nom o z . -o o °�,� o g ! Q 11 ' . 4 cn
a � a
: 0 a' " y '04 .S = c b 0 as a o i 0 . = o a> o Tai c° 8 . �• ..
m 0 . 3 o o .° o o ao �� 3 � v
..
• b co ¢ 4-r o o el a? o ° a> a 0 a 0 0
2 C 0 , 0 . 0) t) 0) a � O 0 N ifl Ll ›, 0
- � ° a ' 3 E °" o 3 c-' = -0 o " o ° b ;; cg c am . . ' 6.
0 E o , a� o N 5 •� A o -;- o o >, -" D o .. 0 o 3
r.., U a> 5 3 a> ., ,. ^0 . a+ ^ a+. rn b 2 .O c, - o F-1 > s> u, • , 0 0 o 0 °a. i 4E. o ^o , o a c � > UE-- , Q . � 0 4 -. a) > °q°' c ct =- U o E• o 0 cs ova oW o-o �- c°
Z v a> o 'N E. � o -5 o ,.= 0 o > o ..= o o= o 0� o . o-0 . i •
a c v a . - 0'3 00 0 a>
b o Q. 4 45 b o -d o °>, .� o. — , o ' a� >, - o a> • = 5 a o
a.)
El 3 A � bo 4� A oc°'ib & - 4-g o o CO >o ° o
d d d o 6.. .0 74 0c ioo •°te r?+ , cd
a.4otn o .. .03 o c 0c ° � a a cho2
w a � �
O 1,.., w ..�
oN t 0 RI a> a ..�'. Of . . N 4 . op
0 on. o o 0 0 3
c . c
O 0 O o E y o v o i. v
0. to.0• a -oA a a) as
ct ,n �O
I.
- i
i i N N N
,n ,n ,n
U
0
1 40
t Q on
04 g am
• o • = o
',I g
tu
o 0 o. r? , 0 > N o. CI .0 tu 0 0 > • bo n =0 on
a +.. •co o c �. i o. �� � v
Gi izi O .+ w 0 0 o. y .
V V) -2 •O :, °p '+. 1 ,
co 0
o s. :: 11 + 4 .g w 8 00 a - `cg
i.i U v� N O 0 u 0 0 ° � ' y "0 in 5 a. v� L is ?: r C 4 . + � 1
C4 o
co a ? ° ' 0 b
g .� r 4 E 3 3 o ct >`o E =A �
U O o - o o U CD y y a V y a
: Q„ 'a... N o & on > d
2 co O C o 7.4= r .U'° -U
vU b • •= Ct g g a.� a) . .) o 2x =
O • N � a. o ; : "C1 ; cd
ci
. . . O C bA z N • , c � O = N O t A = t CO bO o p " 4'" b , � U . G Z (r) E O
A O O O . O • 0 - • "' N O 4 5 c — •3 g ' o • • 5 5 o F-• o. S -o o => g •
El �o^0obu
d .c 6 -o ti 4 .2 c 0 o o a
N
o '5
co on
f-4 0 . o
.2 '
.2
0
as N
4 .
, 7 kr,
U
5
0
g ti.)
t t
siot
bnbA C 0
c
0 O
aaz aa) a., co
,� 0 -- o .5 oU
-o — O U 0 •O a) . c
O 00 ° 3 O . V O O g Cd ti b '4 , i. O
bA O O O O by w O 0• y w ..
° ti j. � 0 . � . O. 5 .). -- 0 0 8 .a p a) y w
A ' 't7 . O 6 O n O p b . b y O 'C3 — • a 0 s. 0
C a) 'd e 0 O l so al . — a > 0 0 O
ati .0 0 0 b , b 0: O C O - 0 0 O rVi, O 'b O +' b 2 bo to i
•G) " ° a) TA LE cd w N . 5 v, cg 8 a) cd . 0 ' b Cd o is > 4.
y b 0 cn ��� o :� > : o o v� ° o 0 0
c d . ", aI o ,�p °- og'o0 � b4 '. °'F•,0" a) JD 7 ? CI. (1) � ,°'a -SA 40 cn
t- � 4 O Q O N '+-' O N bA y s , o , 0
0 .E i
G : A N . ca,() a. - M O .41 ..- > y O E • U
4a o p by w '� ' + "O , 0 - + 0 E -� •S '� O O
+ 'd t '-`� C w `o `� v °� mow .+ �' � � +° W tO 0 G
cd L 'L7 O O O .� ° 0 w .� O -0 C 6 O V by b y
• 0 o ! 0 o . V O cd 3 V O cU • by = v co , O
O p ed .. °++ a) O C p O S , ;b 8 0 p o 0
Z .� O 'd 0 ' N U ,.. i d 0 c �' O O N y m
0 O N O a) cc p • y a) a.+ O
o�0 -o >8 . d0 0 • o ;d� H o : a) o , �
PAf .o0:1c ° ) an . c � °3ac�'. >Aw a� oa cs a a w ai
0 cd ' a) p Cd 0 -' 0
p, A a w
ba 0
��' ' 00 `n acs "" s a ) 45
G s O p N V .4. 0 . a) 5
a- a a. -o a 3 a • tb
a _
itt r4
.°0 c as r. N i ;1
in in
70 rot I
ot I-1
CA U i
E
Q
U
4
I II g
b "
A
i OD b1D
A I X g ,E
ra W
pp��� - soa �a,�o ���� - °moo
en v 3 w a y 0 c � o a� .s � •� 3 0°
Ch o ; o . �o o 0 co 'er, 0o o . �
o o b o o ° o c o o. °
y am ' . d 0 0 0 0 v o °' a. b cn
ar s«, ° > a o :~ ° ° v, 0 : ° • rt c� ., ° o . s..•-
r) , 0 c • °
0 oa 0tl] � ¢aa� c�a. � 2 a) bna'
b y '" • o a.� • 3 y tr.C) N a� v y ow 0.o ¢'� 3 a, cd
Gu O C• 0 y a. 5 O - o o �' • b1) 5 V 5 ri) u) 0 Rs C 0 "al o o
41 V U R •= a a. 0 •.,..• . b0 ° o o : 0 o 0 c-) +, -d "" 0 0 3 L.: 0. p .4 , a) o a., • 0 • a — . � 0i • -is V N 4 _, a . 0 c 0 > U 0 a t O
.� v, 7) 'O �,.. . r C O y oQ w ,j - .. V ti cd cp ... o bA ... ,i 6. O s 0 )
o ›,g=0 . c o d o &E54) t � °0 . �,o 45 ° ��,• NaRi s o o �,-
4 `-000. v )� d:v -o 0.� d °_' E' oa "a. 0 . (IDs� ¢ " v-o
E
d ob -d o ti -0 43 w
a cn v
0
0
ci-
0
1 0
0
0.1...
.. ed
H •y
O
4 tb
4 .
N
I 1 4
v,
1
0.
E
0
W
L o N a) N
0
-g t g g '4 .
as 1 ed
CP
AS
w
�A �A
bi) 00
A c �o 'ti b a 'b A
aaz 0.., CO 0.., CO am w
0 0U i d 0 0 0� 0 "d o
0 0 . ° �:� • ° to • �� �. 0
> 0.°> 0 61 6 O > , ' a) O cr o
c • g 0 a - — a �. Ll .O TS , ... 0 0 a � � cu o. �' -v ' �
E O 0 '0 O 0 O L'. a) O. •.�. O Q O O 6 = co
b i,,,i'r Jo a ' a-4 .0 a) 0 6 > L1. G .-r • . y �, g WV1
u O Q • 6 o a) 0 O 71 C O t#, 'C U 0 a) a) o
v 05, 0 b1) o ;' > 0 r .e .. U rooa, c ,pro
C. 0 0 . > C o b w � ''a) c a ° '" aiF a
CO 0 co by ''g 49 4-.
_ t 4 CI) A U ,n .2 0. 0 ^ C O , U ; o O o O. .. N on 0 ° G o
XI O O . y � � C a) Q .� 0. > O 4 0 b. a) O 0 = ^d '+-• 0. = al 0 Ea co o 'y ca. -r 0. y 00 I b il ! 0 ,.. flflil o 'C N O 0 by > by 0 a) .1.= .0 by b 0 .= O
4 1 > g�0�0 apc ocd o. �a) .a
w
L H ifl
a o .a w E 0 0 0 t C go E i 4-. a• " .,.. • S> b bA
cat n .5 0. (..) C .5 &" 0 c e",3% 0 a l -6 .,,,, .0 0 0 o .--
El 0 >, ° bU w a) ed '° b id 0 0. . F. t , c a) w 0 44 4) 0
4, 0 0 6. ed > C v, O ''' ` O 3 O el) . ra cd v, a' EA 'S O L O
O. a, O en + O + V �+ -6 a O .� by N o G. "C L 0 0
1 ... • a) ^° ',,.. en : a) C -- r 0 O O O °.: w � �� • ° O cd v °
w o cv> ,. o. .
v 0 ) w 0 a 0� 3. 0 a 0 6 0 a C.ao..0
I
0 = .c ..0 bQ O
• O O O O O U y
Alit 0.
yy LL
i > 1... o
o. 0 a) o ° a)
O g ° o 0 • o o o c
C c� ... O "rJ ++
a. v, V > , a .a 4..": ',2 a . c a o
°0 �+
01 1 en 0 vi v7 en en
U
CI 4 4 . . ,)
1
ca .0 ,
. .,„ .. ,
....
.... . .. 1 1 t
0 Q 0 Q° a) Q A
co
art am w w w
w
4. o
r. ° ° 0 . 5 6 w
O U > U bA c > d os "C E g a) o ° I) g o> o
°� L
a � � 4)i ' a � ) � >4- > 0-04 o » °0. �- o
. ,.. g A v' 2 to ° IA "a ° ^o '5 (n O in m a) v, 5 y
-a rh w a)°
.. L t72 sE 3 y � 9 0 a a ;= °- ' a o i
•
v N ^ "' c w d v 0 O w I vU i a y a �" cd 4,
o, gco o� w ' i '
�'° ag a te, °
°` mo o :� a) at.,:,o„0 �'�°
ail • ml 'fl , ova oo v, � w a� .5 : v > 4.) c - 0 c ° ta.
aztio :7 a) 0 'C > b y O 0' ° at
ViIfl • — vi s.. a) CL O U a) O2 > O. O �' Q ° ?� a) a .�... U a � op � b cn 0 >2, c Cok . aaa) 2
.b ° • - c 0 • ° i. 0 o -0 . o }E U ',-) o O a, U O O . U ' 1E ( c ci;
w' c 0 • •j.. $�° a) w 0- c 0 3 a �° N v i:� ae
o as • o .r �, ew O w a� v o
O,���gon3 ° ova boo • .- °N' '°
I.
0.)
"d b 5 °`n `2 o one "' d c 4) • > 4=, ° 51 a.) c. .° O > 2
• 0 , ° 'b -- • N , I-. ' '- ...r O p = 5 O. -.. O 'b ° a ccl o 0 ° ? w a
N Q a 2' 0 •° y G o ° a a) i a> 4 . 0 O y O ' C 8 a) ' i. a) a) O
'0 O . O. GG a �, •
r o U a eG .o 00 cA v) �. oa 00 a O.., f 2 O
W °
o' a) u : � o
on to 0 O to v' ° a) 0 O
5 on
4
Q
0
O 2 a)
b ° '^ 3 r5"' 0
a) O bA O O 0 to O bn > 0 'd 0 1' r-+ 0 [l by
O a.0 aw o.w a � O
• ▪ s.
i
CO '
LN. N s r `
i i n i i
• ,
0
i
0
0
U '
i i ,
°'
it* 79 t •,... ....
o
it
i
.s.) . a,
2� 2
i.
o
a.
� - a 0 >�o ion- d�' °oo. 2 •
o
c..1 1 O 0 0 c.) o > 0 `� cat o u ^ 0 .0 •S a) a� �+ � .. ° 0 0 y t'
o O M. •n a, 0
f� te a, • '' > 0 0 te ° " c� 0 ° o 01) = > 3 rA 0.) a a, a ° U 0 a . • u .a C = = 3 0 o� C . = 0 6 a> + o "d.N -0 a,
�'=
0 U • W ° 3 fib ', a. a, Vs -0 In g r, o
a o ›, • ` A 0 � ;� •o � o v� o N a' ° ' � �s t I .c V o . N"
g vi -a y y O a. w y _ a, 5 v, o. c° ‘I 0 0 O r x U a, - C
H= - O p 0 0 O cd 4..� 4-+ bp o a . •b a V N
a,
tu A O. E E a - dd �>, b = t.
o N ' F AQ - -0 0 1 0 o o 0
CO
0 0
a� = > ° '`�' ' 7 0 O cd O . � �" e 5, - O X+ 45 C.' C a) -. O O 1E1 ;4.71 . ' 0 -0
b -d o o . 2 on c bA ' o '0 �. i 'o a, 3 '5 c • > 5 ' „, •.. N
ciao a,-. a 0 o �a .aO 0 0 .,5, b : � . �00 0 0 A d.�o 7 t I..
o 4-9 o cd s. o o 0 a 5 y 0 0 0 0 0
.-0 o d 0 a>i 0 � ° m •7, o 0) ci) e ° = 0 z a, o= � '' .1 C o
Z cis -- -E. -t:1 o 4 °'' • i o g ' r.04- .° .o o 03 ;,' U cl a
0 0 .a v, a, `
50 0 ) 0 >a.���'rd 0� b0 ,. a. o
—. o U s. o v 0 a, ° o ca a, o a, > 0 0.
ai a, a, ' a, ) -0 ~ a,
a ,.Oa ..,. =3 v; 8 0 3 .a. 4) Z . t aco ° g ro
0 � A . � Q A -w �� E $ ' = o yL1 i o 'ti'� a o
El - • d g . � oo oo.mooa '0o .� 0. o 5 . 0 ° t . d , _ a it i ° - ° o •
d . O 0 E O o y . 2 a, • '> O O y 'O i a) 4) o g i cd G' 'C
0.UA0 a o o a w = es.4 a ° o g 0..0 c 4a 2 a. .4
C D 03 H ° a, y ° a, el) a °
00 goy goy 0ti c t
• cd y ,
Ey o 0 0 c 0 cn • 0 '0 0 0
-01. 3 - 0 3 OD : ° o
2oc, • -G. a, : 0 a -0
v7 `p t'
Z' v7 tri v7 v1
i i i i
II
i
L?
°
I.
Z 4 V t
1. ,• Op
y b a.
o �Q
OD IDA
0 t i .5 o
=b
a Ca a PO
.
0 0 0a o c o "� o
p o U b v a fl fl °�
ic d - p� 3 ; o -d ,, ono b o ,, > A
= I Ril . c
ow 0a > o 5.
C4 a y e "4 . .0 = u a - 2 t r te„ U 0
p a� a� �, o a; 0 5 b 3 o a rn
. 44 0 ) �4 >R Q 4.) c a 0 o
.4.0 cn CO o x o °*" a� > W
il at fi te a. rn 0'
ci.) O"-e. -- *"' <t ,6, §ogrl, 8 _2 (.2) § -41. g .s g E 72 . E
y° 3 y A L) V 0 'd o. V3 o cn `„ o V1
8 bw =5U� ° ,,, m. da .o w ,cn : 1Es
v � . x �° a "wa�3�. a 03z 0
v I�1 0 Q
�'b3 Co °o i ° o0
o 0 o d =b3 Na •
CD
G N
1 a o0 00 vi
i i i
I
I
0
co
I. °a b - -
AA a �0i CO
bA bA b4 bA
- 0 c 00 � o 0
Q "O o b a .c a
i g
a 4 aA aA am - 4 co
i
ba
' ' c , N o a te ) o a>i 4 ° 1 '' 0 0 a. a. =y c„.., 0-0
Q 0 'O 0 y .. 0....0 a) O :4 .. b ' 4 : y E
trol > 0 . 0 o , N d -0 O a) - d b ° 015 Y a on = . , ”..o 1-4 5 o a
yo b a an' a).0 vE O � g e�
mo �Na �, o�� b
o O °'o' � , , ° N - O
y a
0 y b) 0 b ' O ' .2 " 0 •e E -° 8, N a) 0 ° � 0 o b -o -_ .0 v;
a a) ,.
sz a 0 .� to .5 o ¢, ' 5 0 ° e'. k5 f ..= a.
d q C ° ° 0° b A p '' E P 0 o 5 >, .° 5 o a) P. b
a.) o O a) b a) a 7 ' ^c:" i > ` .
�U ' �>,o co 0 ti;�--°� ', a.i- 8 - -oQ Ew 0 >.c N
o y ° a ) 2 - E � , N 3 . = - O ... w 5 bu b ' � —
O bA O O .5 ba = O y 'b ,� G. 'd 8 ce V 0 .0 a • 0 '' b vi • . 0 g • ... IS ;., p„ r. �+ i ° ' 5 0 '
p 0 3 co j C cd p, ... - d O O y
G a) s id . 8 t O "C ' 0 N) >, O • y v ' $y),
Z O p di) 0. N � bA v 'O OD e .0 d O '> O -.' ° 'b 'u "O a) 00 b
a g o 5-c �� = �c,� a)co ; ° te a '73 °" 7.4
r, C ° a) y = C a) �n b a s V 0 c O C
E a)4, to-5 o .' .. ' .0 °.50 °. .50— 0 co o
o d a ) i. S. N • . E O C 'b .- 5 a o •' d 0 � 'o 4 9 �,
Oa U a a o� .0 a.0 a ac.W O a o0 ct o .CG cd . 0 c i.
= b
U
> cd
• C bA a)
U. . .., 1 • ' C O O
• C a 0 0 ¢• ed ...„
ct
bo
0 O O p 2 to C t �O in
b ° q p N ~O p'O °M
ti Oid
C
O o a 0 a N a.o O aa t:.
000 00 00 00
vi vi vi r.
N
X i i X
a
0
U
l a' l a a l a l a . l a
a
a
g i i g 1
, . 0. -o b ai
A A gA coo g0 go
on on a n o n c bC
Eb o
a '6 co a g o a
aaa aaa wm
°'
o a'd o� b �, o 3 — °' , V . �
a
a a a v, . ,. a a Q . :; b ,.. VI C. O OA .� o ° > • . 1 id . Irs
'S A e"' 77 ti Uli CD CA ° I U U I
a 4. � � �d ' � c o v) ;3 0 ) b �, ; a. a) 3
C s�E� ° > -0 - a.. •n a. on O v`�, p ' 0 0 0 c a. o y 0A
a p „ .40 e e d ed A D o v, ° o a a. . a
a o v) :b e". °a'� o o a s es "! .° 'N 8 .4 V . 4 O -8 f2 3 5 0 o
t w 0 e °, 00is o , oo c c 4. 003 o
' a .a a i ° a ac >,° a fin° 3 ° ° a o aen c a�.
•, 'y on ' = 7, c a .0 ' b i 'o o '••� b - d
let • o 0 �= ~ 0 0,sb . a �. 5 G a wt) 8 v v°, a s :ti 5 - v, 3 „) a o o.
A , 2'44 N .r a 8 a a b o b' o ed 0 v, ° o C = ° a. = a
..rU �o,.aav o '
� ° ,o o 3 o a ° > on �
o `er . 5 >a ' - 0z�a o °p 0 os� y' • c0° a .• o-o
4. U 4. .= . y CI . 4, ed 5 .Z ,C E1. m co a o E. U ° — a , co o , o
Z o 0 a o- cG 3 ° .,5 F'' a .a v; 0 c) 0 a .: ❑ U
so 0 g ? a 4.) ... , � . 'd co = �+ co a' ° z '" 0 0 = 4. ° 0 ° o `` a a te+ ' 0 o
b � � , g a > () a , z3 -c 3� ' E E - -o N•S -o s 0 0 - d 6:
o N 5 o o a' 0 :x > o 00 •' E co 5 • N tk r i � 3 ° on a.. o v
f 0 a •.. a 1. o ,. a... c . a s .� a o 0 3 O o o .�D O �, D o O w 0
= C.) t
)) a) c o ) 0
`.) o
0
0 0 0 0
a. to
C
a
OD 01) 0 0
a X) a , a p p., O U O O o o O 0
cl
o L
X z O O O O O O
crj vi ,,. v'i vi N
1
1
U
so
co
i * $.
a r
i:i 4 9.
aA bid an bid o4 on oA on
0 o
i 0 o
t3' o co ' 0 co 0 0
aAO a ao E. co
O p 0 O -o To' O
c ,-, -o
0 cA 0
L s IJII a , o 0 -, 0- -o a) , o ,0 C y CO 0
� .) . 0 RS a"Q oU a � i U 0-� i A g 0 ^0 " o -0' � a
co oo c � 0).0 y =o 0 gO 3 •g a, V 4 • o ° 'o o c)
v, - v o ° O ) oo
c 0 a)) k oq •> a, 0 0 0 00 0 a, a�i Q y 00 'ti - c
a °' o 0 0 00 a A � b ,: c, > o a; � ''3 0 o •b .r . o rn C ti = a? ° . = ° a. Q . > o .O
0 X .8 0 -= =S � w° o°' = ° � ° a o
d= g °:''o 2 b i of �3v' c sco OD� ; . bp 0. oa� cu° .
.s o o. O 0 ° 0 - a) . ° ° y 4, ° �' p a a)
u 0 , 0 � 0 . 0 o b v,�, � -flo b v o. ':0ai �o oa, ^ o o „a
o ° A o ,- 4 •• o • o 0 o aa) o p o o ° 0 : 0 a, o GO , > .... ° 2 >, � s : �
-0 .D ;d 0 t---• 0 •- o = . � ... = g 0 o ^ r ; i O. G c .Z 0 -,9 C )o 'b
0 w 0 u. A 0 .0 —0 0 3 w, cd . to N 0 L 8 4- a) 0 ' k 4., 8 4-+ U
Z 00 0`o�. 5 ,,,s o o � ��o c .da 2�ou oa,w, obn �
++ .0 -o 0 -0 '�' ° oA v, a o a) '� : O a F. ° a) cn N fl a]
v,
as 0 co 5 8 C ' z O t5 — 5 co y a' 0 i +_' c = , t3 0 cn , ° c0 - b t o 0
a, �,wo �„o �,0 on o�,o b 0 0 3 0�
VI +' °
0
o a ° cc ° ) 4 os-oo aa. . .0 aa � > oa. a O a0
a> a) a) a> ;--
0 0 0 o w , an
i a.)
C
H _. "C7
a) a) b
• by 0 0 o4 to
0 0 ° A ° 5 o 0 c 0.
.c '5 a .0 a a. CZ
C -- N
g z O O O O
vi cn vi vi
0
1
O.
E
U'
w I f y a a) i CI) 5
$ 0:0 t . g . 1 i
g t
A A A A a.
a, 0.)
0) 0) A A _4 1 mi A
a .. ., a ° a ° a ° w w
> ' b w
• OA ed • a% w. y o - 0 D U C 4a' • ?r 001 . cce
:b 8.-8 goU o CI y E .1 4) c 8. ` c ' a
:: 0 . O E cC 'o ^� Vi a) i i i 0 ▪ ° w N a ° N > 1..i w
C60 U a 'z 0 a 0 . z 5 U cd ; ; C. a� w • a> �d ..� A a� �..0 a) 0
Cti U . ,2 a) = .- y . • ,,N .. o , 0 O 'O .. 0 A 0 w b --
oY4. Q A�0a) a� ' E.5 a G .: -.0 0 iy3
0 U r�i, ',,.� o .C.� o 0= .b a 0, o a.) N o a o
ri) , � � -. eA C to •N B O 0 45 4 . • a) v � o U �. E >, 15 A 4) A, • C o 5 °' °'' • N 6 o .. O.d 0 o
CI 4 0 y ' �" " O .fl c4 fL a) al 4'4. U 'b c ; a b j h
c:1 .10 j ,.7, 0 -. -0 7:: 4.) g op E ta% d p o oa ° �a b ,,,•=tobo ° a „ $o 002— .0= OA �o
, ) ° > 0 , one ° i y o b 733 .°.: � w i i • ta ,
ier « 3 o W .... a� .it .0 C o g• �' Q" 3 U 0 ..= oU .' C = LO, ..+
Z > ° il 0 ° ... .. O O v O . 9 a. 0 b.0 0
a' `. ^O p. 0 v i i N 0 .. 0 U .o �' 45 = . 0 rz a) r U 0
V ' � 0 a ' 'D -0 aA. .d c .$-',1= cd ; 'b o 0 0
p o ' 0 0 o 4-• O OA b .. .. .� ° 0 0 •0 4: to a, r a• 'd . - . - U , g g • .,..,
o t . a� . O - a. 0 ¢ . • N 0 .- it O bA cd • 0 0 0 .m .. I. i t I. , 0
•tt o •° 0 o -- 0 • ° .0 O 0 ., 0 a • ° � •? o � a) t... es ^v . � 6 , � a
-, a a. A aa..0 .0 0 P. 0., a Cl, 0 .0 OA a•.. a..=1. a cn cal
ad O
O "1:1 : b 0 W 0 a) 0
o
j U O� O 0) O O
a.
• c� 8 U ~ "
..E cd ° �� cA C a. U id ,.. . a. fa) U 0 w .. ' 0 O 0 O . y O . 5
;A O.t 0 0 aC OA y O b
O O 0 U 0 'd
V • s.. a 2 a) ' L. c c?: t� Z 0.. s.. = • cr g C d
O aa,•�a aa�a. O Po 4D ac,a.
a
E� w CA
U
•--. N M V1
N N N N N N
OM vi vi vi vi vi vi
I
0
0
U
°
A A q
0
w w w
ht -5 6 3 O 0 o w 6.
oN0vv5 0 3 ' v,..0 a � >v
O : � � 0 0 0 0 c 0 a' 8
flh o ; Uh
0 .
C p, b `+" a R O a a � i Q Q .. G a, 0
v, 74 N O 0) A �. a� ° .b O ' 0 CO
C .* g � 0 F. . _ b > , 0bw ' ° ' 000 0= 3 00
El 0
C D t
r.., a c cd 2 0 0. 3 O B N c d a 'fl 0 .0 m 'C O Q..2 A 'b b ..Z .--1 •
° 0. ° -d 4 vi y Q 4: c S 0 4.4 m Ca. o
'a V 0 ' rs o y ° c ; ° -o ar o � 4) 0 . .- a, c s' 3 ,.. ..0 � . 0
• o ,.= 0. 0— .0 0 O O E b O
o _
Z O 4. 04 C . 4. m 0 o a? vi .a 0 OO i ' d ° ti ^ O id &.. 3 4. «i W
0 0 .5.E -0 o• o '° ~o �.�-v 0tA0.C1E E0 0
r.+ 0 A .x ....0 y ez c cd o y .. c a> a , O > v, cd a, °
s� L, 0 O � y .-. 0 0 a° v , y 0 . 0-o5 . .o b 4 0 E w 0 o it "
0, id g E 0 O 1 y - aU 0 . 0
TJ c c # °> v N , v i i ° v . 0 0 cn 00m0 -080 z•Lt o 2 a o � i o f 4 o . E t O 0 d
0 'o ao > • b i 'o > '� O aa an al d s - d co o .4 d v3- .o =. E
c: a. • .� 0 • 0 ca � � a,
0 do
qp O O 0 s.
D 0
O
V . + O "Cy
1 0 �� O. v � - G
m O. 0 b 0 m O. 4' j
o 0 E o f o 5
S. b 2- 0 6. �. SD
O � C O. O 4-
. _ 0 . . w . 5 a: a w
I
S 00 °i
1 N N N
vi vi vi
to
1
ili
0
U
� a.) a a
II A r1
2 a,
o
LT. w
F �" 0
0 0 0 p 4. r V O z y am' •`+ • .� W
U V -. fl iI U i Vil O
co 'O O ti & A OO
o• a'ti -0 � ; a '~• L 3 aai
a O 0 . � 0 N �¢' °o�
= Q, o o" c o o - ba...s � a a
li iU a; H!J SZ
0 td h 4 ': o --
o °' � _ o >�o a s -0 ov0 0 o a
, z1' ;? °' o a. b ` a o A 0 Q 0.4 4 ca c
—, 4=, a o , O a o cd•° et 0 4� o ..'b p - — 0 �w
c 0 Lam . A .0 ' 7, c 0 Uh .F O 9 = o ra O ;? a 0 c .4 U
w
E1 0 0 0 0 w < o <- a. 1 10 : -0 c g 0.� H• °; 1 00 o b " 0 6. d w ob ' 30 a ooh -ow.2 o.c�
a F- o a 0 Za 3 g o tt a o a a ci
oo
o .4
b
0
-0'4-6 o
444 TO
y
C
O o Y Q
s.. N •. ; 0
O .. ,0...
a g
C. . a
iii
to
0 -
i
1
a
1
U
I
g a)
c. a a 1
4 x A A A A A
6.
w w �. w i.L,
0 � . = ° a "°� •� > �
ca rn O s O r d N c bA +A d a) °
A• �.a o� _°? '0'
(A t) 0 , •--.. -0 ,,, ,,,
00 .E y w - c v , — H ° .� .i ° p >, ••- .
u • r., , 5 V .. O a) A (s. = v G z y t ° . 'E s. Q C a . °
40 6 .
UU
0 co s- 0 y = a O y O o U 0 a O N
>, = o
° o ° „ sr �� o a -. y °- d w ° w o a E ° '"''' -= f.) 2 c ' l B E g 4t,...-: g' 0 9
° 5
bo .10 'V+ b ..�". cd CV . , Q) •> ,v rN 0 f , '0 4.4 ° U • " fi r ° 4* a 1.
y
El ' _c o ff= o a . •go - a° = N .o-d[•i, o°o'0.b o o ° - = o .0
E a 2, o5 °�-o0 ° - o .a ���•oc o• -
,,s c''' 0 �' ob.c o-° �— Z � o > ° o.5 y , d o. 2 o
g °P 8 � a . a 2 ai ci u0 a °3 a �v. . 0 a . 00.00
a>
0 g 0 °`� 0 3
diA c& 5 0 0 0
CL y LL e� t . > > > CL
a bA a) O N O O +4 ' „ a a . I. 0
.01it • CA b �' ccd Q cd cd 0
ow o o a o o a o >
o- 0— o -v o;° o o a.
a 0o.a)a .0 .0 0* ..0 a3 a.-
J x 4 N N N N N
kr; kr; kr; cr; v;
1
i
e
0
U
04 0 a
1
t ' g gA g 3 3 3 °
a.- 0 0 0 0 0 0 . c.) t
o0) 0 0) 0
a., 3:0 57. 3:0 aaa a aA aA
s.
= c 5
• cd 4
0) N o b
A, > o r" a °p F 0 . 4. o a . b o > a >, E
0
u III
r. a) o o
o o o o c, o 4-, o ;• ° `° 0 ° a O t .�
°' Ia..- g a,8°) to c70 o te a)
s r,, .e e >, . of 0 = ' 0 a) , ai y 3 . � a) o 5
a)
R °) °� U w b �� a
i. A y ° V a) ^° � O . > by ° A " O o . ° � 0 o N
a) o C OD a b bA . � a) a a o p, U 3 �.
CD c..) : 0' > 0 b ° � i � 0 3� '.. a a i 'Q w 8 o ° moo ' s
0 0 0 o a. 'S a) a) >, 0 0 JE ,
$ .0 a) O . ct 'i•+ 0) ° a) O , 0 w 4) p. a) a a) >, V 0 U -30
o ►. a >, 8. a) H , o .- b
a a �O o a ad o co 0 a o .�• 3 a te. 0 3Q
V • 0 -.• o so e� >
a)
y o W 04 • `° ++ Q o
, 0 o va. oe °.
. a) @ a
,ti E E w 1:1 ) o Ct on u > ° . a �r
`t Ta g tot;
I. O a.0 avow° a. t+. aw o� o
F
t C
et
vs 42 00 - . - . N M
'� N N N E 4 4
.-. r . .-. .� ..
vi vi vi H vi vi vi
.2
I
a,
1
U
0)
a)
0 o .. E
il .he
1 -4 3� 3° $° A 3 ° 3°
a) c.) i .0 g
a 4) 0 0 'o a 0 a
aA aA aA a aA aA
a
;o cl s ^off" N „, >,
0 '. � j U y o a) a) o a a ag A N
0 a . ... O 0 p O Q y O ^ a) a. = s.. 0 a) a) ,- 'b .„ ..
001 y O I. a... .- +r a) ct •+- U j ed O > 0 a a Q„
p, o '� ° y > y a 0 U O a) 'O" G) N G" '�C � S bA + ey
✓ y v ° o o u a 0 i ; ., 3 a a �` i a°i a 3 ) b 0 *3 •-.
co o = +, t , 0�A Q o N > C ? b . e — �d a) y + „0 ,,., . 2 4 . > y a ° w o CL 0
CL w. a . > P. 0 ) w a s
rn a '"o a o 0,0 2 o Aa a.• - .�
y e a OA 0 .- oa o 0 00., aeon. �v
o aa. o'd . Q a•Caw 0 0 0-o i O " o 0 ..- o, a)
0
d0'�a� � 0Aa 3 >o a. w. a. o00
A v
0. 4 I oa .4= ° > O o 3 • � a. N . o � � • N . E • 5 a > i o
Cti Q a) b4 C y O o g a 0" ," . V1 0.) ° 00 40 E , +' A 0 + ,; • \ O . N
- j N o 0 N 0� a. 2 c4= o- a� o 0 e c a N., • o a °� a)
++ -o a� o . . v, v, v
�' .5 �.� 5ba 't ..h4 o al 151) .:4 ob.§ o� 80 ° 0 4 a) o c 8 ig
, t tko ...4 ;E ' o. oo• od0o o 15 O., ^ v, '•••• o y boo =
O ci ° a a) 0 o o 0 a ° ° a co o 4, a -b o .a A 0, y a.
0
G CZ o ,o. a) 4 z U i a Z E. 0 S O ' a) a) .2 C w4 o U ro C a O
O >, o v , p a . ^O . r, a) :O ° , `" > o O y a+ .5 « f a. a) a) . 0 2 id IS
v ..' va" vH f+.• 8 °' o 0 a, A ° > ° l '' �' °° 'b 4,) i•b . 0 c a w
a. w a) . w ,. ,„ •> ' v, a.) w 0 ' v, •- a) c O O .O . ' U s. b a� • . }.�
b ' O 0. N O O O O 2 a ° c) cn 0 •
Q. -*••• v , a °A c O .�., 0 •° 0 O. 0
•
a. E- a a . • a c ° .) E -•. •
a a) i A - v + . o 0 o 0 �Q a° o a ° '. - cd a
oo t, oa „
b o o o f a ° on _ = a
O N a. a ) •+-' a • -. o = 4' .a o 0 g 4 E v a', v .° ' y � . -4-.+ S :c +�- Q b id & w
to .� +4 a. 3 b> 2 3•�, oA v
° °a °.c�c o � � �b ' ° p • a p d ' -o
p N p b O= N a) cn A 'v to y O I a, p a.
b • ed ... U +-• ° O O O N 0''' •4. 0 Oc„ U O
a.� a. 5b a a acc) o.1.
I i
1 i
v, o0
Z 4 4
v
vi vi vi vi v;
1
i
Q
1 i • C .1', +,
. 1 i
.7 rzu
g
a
a 0 j 3 b ❑ U 1 4.. U w r C-+ ' C O
on 'd ed y O V 4. u
p., o on ',- O E , a o a) N a° o .N
e� ¢ °' °�ocL °� -o �� ,, tea 00 FA
•..
o a. +- 0 o. o p Il i U
v1 b w � o H o � � > , Mt0 '+.1
44-1 -,
h +"� Cd F., y O a) 4 , 2 E fi r. V �Q � 0 O a. .•"
44 -0 o 0 N b E
.5 U ai � -0 '= � � . = - FA 5 ° 0 "' °° �
Q v 0 2
. >.E aa) o 'b o O o o.a g 1b O N
�'' cd U ti ° 'C ..„05,, . b ° O > p Cz. •> O. .,-' p O
Z 0.) 5 4 < 0 -0 . � °" 4 - , 0 E, � ' = A a) 3 boo' N o
b > a) o t ,. 0 2;, oi) •r, , U
I+ C co 0 w ,: o- N cg.a. 0 a° ' ° " k a c
E 2 a' ,>°., ° o • E, a a ` ai . o>
° aai o ° `A h bn U o . ' C > o. a E-+
Q i. a ° 4 1b a) g ^ o
4. ai as U • , a) U U V '= a) U ca ..c U •6
U a o A a) .5 .5 a2 0 .5 w
oA
a
00 0 a 0 o
a t.., N
CA LL .2b
o .o a. c
x 4 ' v
tri
I
E
El
c
U
eta ": /
i
i i
PSG <.
• ° b n 0 w = . I fl I !IL 4 6; 84 on o
a ° 3 0 a } rA c o f 3 G o
el
to
w o 111 O III ° 0 o aa, .=-1 • cA t •S w iU • C > ° o w o ° o
Tae 2 0).° 5 ig2 �a��� U� a i °' � N 00 76
_+ 'ti v) ^O a O •o U y O Q N
a, o �� ° �a a) 01
s a °A Q "8 y � '- 0 v ° �1.r,� o
•e b.0 o U a) 2 .o o > ° ° 3 3 -o a , 0 ,. o
CO
I+ O y O . , y Z j a) N ° pOp �E O O iC 4 = ) 0 O O ( o. a, a b a) •C a.' a 0 ' bU O M. a W 2 N j a •
Z °o '� °" a 4. ° -o o •b O �° o ° g
r , ° a) a) o ° a) N .. a) (. 3 v a, .5 c? c.
� . � o o o 0v o�nQ o o?
! a. ° °; b•a' o° o :Se > p o0 J 4 1 3 U a cd El
... a ....
....,
-0
6
X
I
a
E
0
U ,
C
111 -d a
b 0
p. x 9, o� 04
:is =b
C
a A wm
oq (4. 4.,
CI 0
a� y o ° 000 - g . 0 '3
. ° � � �° --:O
et > i 3� ° p o � N o f a, b o a a,
.., as a ed E «i v , "ob o b .> 3 a
w 0 ° 5 >, x C o> " o •- a) V S oil >,:f..
o C a O p C , ° 4 .,_,N4 a, v
a 8 a. _. 5 �° a) - = o. s a o N a a� g c� o > a
CI) 0 co 'C o 0 •"" a O u., 3 •p
as ° °3�° � �b o� �� JD 04 w
os b�o L i
° a • ∎ N o b ° u °'0 c ` asp
d d 1:4 N w a j=' C > C G 8 ' > a � C in n' N
cU °" 0 o ` ��� G�N' o r o ° � o �
4+ s0. a, 4r .�+ v i y .+ VI O N C cd 4: C C O 4 .2
a+ C C ° > 3 y ° b A b ° y E •y a
ini 4) c > 0w +6' o 0 00 =c °, o c a? °
. 8 0. o a o
Z o S °o•� �t a • �O ado ° N og v ` - tg U o 'c . 0
- - > t 0 w - . >, ° a� > = o c C ° 'et cc 0 .) 0 b 8
'p Hh ' o 0° U o ww° enP4 a) •S Soo o v)-d v) x 0 3 � 8 0
El a •
d o a. d' o '� cv .6 d o 0 ac.' o •?" y
a A ao ''A
4.. i
C
.0 o >
as
a - a
> o o Ai E -.4
O > . O > U bA Zr-,
., . y :.d C C 4
G L" td •° O a :° U
CA C4
a, .9. E a as .4 . O
O .
v1 V'i
1
ok
E;
0
U "
V1 y V y
i . . g . 0 i
a .a cl,
55 a • a .a a
aA a a a
•0 0 "d 0 °'
0 -0 �.
AO y cd > 1-. o o 3 a) 3 4' y 1 y 1 'o ,5 . '� E v l •`2 a . U 0 72 8
0
t,„ e c o 3 .o y A > • a Q.. z*. i s p,. y o o . d .
ta era > A °b i b y `� b� °•a °'�. } � . � � o 0 � C � " .� ai o ca V.
c o ^ d a) ,1 g 'b 0 � 1 -* ? b ° Ol) I. 0 y = a O •- w 0 V
CA 0 og 0 � 3>,0 . ° _r" + a ° ' '4 ` � 3
.io ° o . > b b4 o A
o '0 oA c . 0 °? e� 0 a, coo. ... U o a) ,.., ' w 0 a? y ,
on ° � . > y � .� � w o A b v 4, .- o `°, O '" . • a v s, .� � >y y v7� -o�'0 0 w -" p � 0 F '•:�
id U y `s ' 4, U o •-• - . N •..0 m b w o >, a)
,E,-. . .. - o a .o-0 on o a, o b 0.) v •
i �� MI �' � - � � � w'�'
a, i `" '0o ' (I Z e o y0 = g a 2 i a ; ? o � 04 o �, ` + oo. �, , 4"y � = 'o i' 0° o Clo
Q o 0 • °,� = .� i = A a) 4 3 . 0 0 0' o 1 f g+ 45 o� r a+ N
0 V Q i. cn a) > o a. E= a o U •O °1 3 'b .1.:' CC G , o .ti c .. R
. e ° d :� 0 ° .... � .0 0 • = 'd °A •- 0 on I. 0 z 0 o 0. , •.. 01 a) 0 U
0 . 0 0 > , U S 0 - C - • 5 0 E 'b U U 0 0 o a - . ° C `d
a r „ o co y = 0 3 W o , . > y w `� v)= > o — .
O o 5 b
c � bn y -� o .� y .� oq
Z g y a 8 111 •c 8-o a 4., o ° vi G `d ` ¢ °) v 1 ° C
�, a • " > `� >~ b a) ❑ °�' 0 c c r.. °) a i o n b Ir a) a ) y CA
o a) o ct T.; C7 0 y `d o U ed 0 o v o c3 C a) Q o b o °' o .c
a) c� 0 'ti IE 0 a) 0 0 a) �t • c 0 a) ° I. 4
,ti ° c� v i ° w o !:),..E >,
8 a) +s a a b b a oA > 0 a� y 0 a°i ao g " o 0 o. 4 o i o w �W O y .ti on W a a.°o 1:c9 cu
E :. .. 4 „ o ., `d o .r . ' a) .c cad W i . d a 0 ti ° 0
O 5 a, 2 L. `n 0 U . I. r•. ^. U a, o 0 U .. 0 a) a `d O 0. a°i`o'� •(-3 0.52' o
a0U341 0 ed a
.� `n L. 4r 0. by y `d > C1, En I. W f ir O U -E U 0. - vi U - E ` c n C 0 .. G .0 y •
a)
4r 4. 4.
fl C 0
. ' 0 0
ea '.
En
— r a) 0
E .c b . a , "S a. o o Q .
CA 0 >
a a a.0 5 o aa.o g B
a
. c
vi 4•i `ri `ri
o
I
0
U
ro
3° 3°
. 0 t
1 1 1 a 0 0
0.
a A aA
a o 05" 0580 Y . h. .o °' ` '. m0 rz
O o p . . . N A o p y O w -0 w U CO . "
F • FA ;; o ° g p° z o o g 0 0 0 c d °, o +� 0 0
a, 'F-8 o c o ff . `�;' °0-', 4, a
o map � �
0 -o t) • 0 ... o Uo_
O d a, 00 0 0 0 07x, a, ,
0 C r. - V b a te , x 5 3 ?, 0 a E 0 _, .. p O
Q, ° a, U oo a i 0 c U ' . 0 , 0 a , U �; c � 0
Q'' a °' 0 h °' >, Z2 = b >, 4 E 0 c '', a, a b 0 0 4-
15 v 01 a, 3 o - O a >, o u. ft I .;� 04 cHU N f4".' N C 02 w c. — c�.�� °°'c0ona 0 = 0
4.. ,-, cd -. c, p ' c, • .. a, O 4w O N
�+
co o ' .. p a p 0 0 0 o 0 a
a, o c a '' Q . a, a a p , a, «3 � p °' p a , .2 0 a > �b .
=1 cd °� '. 0 0 0 -.d 5 a� a g a 0 0, 0 , 0 o . N o °'2'
''' a, • y o n a a , P. o .. `" c o
1=1 O b 0 E CCI Lz a cad Q. > 4 W ar 03 Q, -- bQ Q. Q. b Q , .0 0 o a) . t
4 o . - c4 v � o s d cn a t ; o �' . F, `^ I 0 .5. 4- . . ' a - s o ,
,,
V:ti . -.. >,O > o > .v .N o -O Q • o0 E
0 3° 0 0 o o 'ti 0 ..= .ti v
P o � y c ; ')° a 5' 0 " 0 8 ° o,0=0" 0�g- a,a 0 2= ° o
o' p , 0 ed a w �+ 0 ' c� c�" 0 0 Ems E cn cnn d Q
b�OOQ.RI o O'04 CI) 'a,� c - o a; w
g 5 g, • "off 8 Alb a o 0 A 3
O o ▪ o
w 0 O w uO
w o a) a '*..° i. 0 a.
I 4- w �� `•�• C Q
.^ • bQ L. u b A ..o
H c d ° 0 w
O C +., a, o g I a,
,raga ..,ak i. • ° • - 0 0 • ° �
av)( a . 0
2
SI
4 4
1
E
co
U
L.
4
•
• 3 3
c.) .c.) g a A aQ aA
C 0 ' ° ° 0 0 ' S c w I = rI) I 00 .2 o ... a :7 , 5 _0 cz.
7c5 a
e 0 G .4., ° °' C 4. by .' 0 y .4 'v 0
0mabq. ° o
co :1 `* bo. 0 to 0
V 4 • v
I ° I bq • il '. ' e� 0 0 • a co
° 'C 0 o 72 v; bU a s g 00.0 ` 0 o ° " C 0 >
a 0 .o '8 . , o co 0 C7 b y -- ° °'° ° R.
is, ceQ cu
az .-
...f 0 0
o 0U o o ��i
•El �
1 11 !! fl I ,s o V o ff '' o B 0 +�� , C 0 R gi U iU V � 0 ki«� 0 g N
y C >' c 'v , 3 a b A H 0 ..�. by C 0 a 0 c
AU
a N E �v 00. oU =•- ° `" , � 0 . .eta .= - b • 5 ` °' S .
E a co — et a s 3 ,�, � + � � °' ° o .� o & w F-� -d a 0. C "O a a) en
6
0 a bq w>, 4 t) 0 0 rn ..r.. ' O j ea 0 a 0 —,°
a > O 0 b 4 e C �9., a tb ° • c am +-� al. 0 a. �. •� U „..,•.. � ° 4 .c o s. 0
° 3 a
� 0 a0 0 N .b w ..0' -=. U ° 0$.) .0o ea ° co ° y nE� pr
El «i 0 00 to a ,..:r co c1 b b .2 a '" ° p .2 . b d a o ''., , a 0 '> ° C • . F- .r a 3 at re F, .� ed H w o yr 0 ^' ° Frr ° .4 -0 ed
.r) 01=liz-2 O. r., 'C'S >,i
o 4. 1, o CO
LLI 8 p '++ 0 0 C.•.
ea . •� 0 o a 0 0
` 0 0 • a c bn id
' o p, a 0 >
>, o
' bA .a 0 '. a v 0 g
2 o0 o�
0 0 o o g o la
• av, 2 a a a ` w
A
- o a. 0
N
vi vi kr;
a
U
4
o o b .�
: 14 ,.: ft o
aA a A aA
v, U
a) > a� �" -� �+ a> co
42 w 0 a to S� O VI
cd bq.. 0 4. 0 o. . , 0 b o o
s► a ��a „ a 'C 2E' . 0 oE• .c 0 0 01:1 H �, by a) U aa' CC +r bA� N U .� E a o
a > ^ v a ) it 0 ° •� vi 4.) ° - . .a N 5 I
0 3 o� vL ° a ° i � 0 o y 3 � N a I.
W 0 cd O `" ' U p a) o .0 4r PL j bA O O H a) - d 0 N 0 cd a. U 1m z :b +, O 0 0 �' • o p" • ti ,, bU °
v i
C p I' > a Q cd a a t 1 .. � U r 0 c Z
y d r U 0 t y v W 0 O :ti a 41 • tt 0 " C . 0 a) • 0 0 U
A U y z °° a� '° O cd b -� N b '
+r q:.1 �� °' b *-o „°° ° yam " 3 v ;
a 1-0 0 0 = * "4 cN'° °� ° 3 0 0 to
A E"* � '�y' 3 c4 V 4 0§g b ° o oA ° � a > b° � a�
tl
o ob o •.' 4) °" ° w ° ° ° = a' U 0
d o • o o a , o ao o � o �a ° 'o 0 ° • .o • b a;
U a g UE- v� F-� aw aaoi a.� a5 3 E ow°
b
w . w
by –a �O 4- c... .o 4O ono .
r . = � oo = N go4 -'
o a w o 0 c 0 c , ,.
"Stu g on • ° o c Fi g ou oo .2 c a
� , a�i � ° � O bn
a 0 .5 v 0Z C� a T.' .c . o . 0 .E ob
A. -- —
to t
~ (-.1 W
vi
1
la
U
c a
w It
k ° a a i A A CL
a a bp 1 20
C".) 4
a .w am aW
.. a� two o b
o 0 d °? 0 4.. 2; c.41 •.mod' cn ; g a; 3 4 -
8.-
t4'2, � °°0o a� a°:�
3 a 0 l o t) 4:5 � y;: 0 ��
w > 0 3 a ° a� > Oa v' cn a) = .r o4..=
G4 = o aO W � �� '� 0 °' � �" N ate' 3 w 2 0
°' • .. " - 0 .- 0 . 0:� 0 F "4 . 0. 0 4 " 0 - v ' v' 0
:4 7) .0 3 .0 a . ...s' 3 H ° 0.. E o . cd o '� •o • ' 0 3 o o. �a 8° o - "
z, o o .a a °a•>
o
• o 0 0 a ao 0 •- • by = "c) b bib 0 0 o � •-, � . --. cn
v , 0 o , . + O rn C ° O • ,o .� v� O iC ;'0 i� •• 'o 0 . v 0 ,., •,..1 'V a E. o � 4) to .,E > E CI 4. ti: v' 0 3 0 0 0 p •.. O o a0 v , v i CI) 0 y v' w ° O • • ... 0 0 �,.., Q L Q � „ 0 (1) t d . -- E N 0 U 1 v' = 2 „Ls El E
El 33 � a 3 � • o 3 ac 0 a '0 ' 0 0 . 08' �
d w o;o . . 2o? ' o t" oA 4•,.O onop aocno cs
a at= a as a 0 a = 0 0 . - . 7 o a) .g
w U
o O 0
. ffi
Ei g E g � h b a p
H y a, v' ” b
.. ., ..+
O = 0 ._ 0 --,
a.0 a a 0
0 N M d•
, vi v)
vi v i v'i
•
0
1
Z.
el
0
U
+, a0i
is Da
9 Cl) i
4 . I.
0 E r to 5 1 g
a. C.:) a A r t . a a,A
v, o y .. > , r) . v > +3 a a?
° � ' a 0 o ° o 0 0 30
• 0 Z . a 0 .s o a Via, o , 0. cn al
to
t' ° o ° o °" ..9.. 0 0 a cn a o o x + a 3 X
°"� '` � a . o > E . a> vi v� ° • • a 0 op
° 4 � O ' 0 3 0
-dam o o �Z 0,„ =. ~ A. ° , E ' b' E 3 E co 4. M.F.
X a a o i 2 0 iO a , E3 a 01 C b > 3Q = E cd U o
C 0 a ++ " Clr O U D a , a = t' 0 i E O o y M
w o 0 E. • g; E on ►. 2 g on 3 .0 b a, a, o a, a ''-' -4-. cd
0 FA ; 3 va•a,a o c o;o -d E00 .��a ;> ' � � a o ,
r.+ V +, w E a 3 � o a� -d a ye F � o o O U c, a� fx Q u = c- ' • C 3 O N 0 U �' E iii . 5 8 ¢' '. N + 0 + - o N a - 0 ° ° a E w °
a, a 0 . 0 8 . a .a w cd 0 -d cd O O +-' 000
0
iI. t,, cig U cd 0, 0 a, c� „0 a c� 0 3 0 °' ca a, 3 c b o 0 O '+,
o '0 • . •o N, A , o . 0 U 4. t" U v o ._
Z �a,�, ~c°, iiw �'a 03 one a °o • o = o° �av �.
o 5 a 0 , a .41 o ° a ' c a) b • U o 0 0 0 Q 0 O 'b ^d
c 32, ,c 0 0 3•. ..o a, ¢ °'> b +' ui
-0 • ° 0 , = a, 0
y 0 4 A b ›,000 0 ° .•-. 4.s b„ w� 0 ° ai o o ob03
lia o 3 � .- ,_. 0 , s a 0 0 a o c� y O 9. � U n a U 5 4, o.
+, o S. .,
.< o v - 0b °. 0 4i E },. – c. c Z 0 'b 0'0 •
a ,--4-'
+, co .0 0 0 ct a a rm. — c a Oc 0 O 0
0 s.
a, Z c
CA.� o o
U 0 , U
0 ° o ft. ° 3
0
E 0 0 a 0 0 3 4 '
ct co
O o +�'yc o c ou w an
° b o'o o�b0 a
aw.z a .o ° : a a N aa:. x'0 0
ifs
is g cn v? oo a,
, n to cn cn to
r. r. r■
tn t tn tri
I
t.
0
G
1.
1 11
1
11 I
3
aA
3 +4 .0 a _
w ,a te -a—
�? ° �� NO 8 g E �� og c
o - v o ; ° o � e yb bpi o c w b a. o
cg .,- o • c . by c ° '> ° U °' I,
fir. gh a) 0 3 o a 0, 5 .2 c S t => o ° 5
tr 0 . COD ct 03 7 2 ,..5 o t .':.?. 670 -Z . ?! o 3 p o �, 00 a) bg a , ww ~ 4+
o O...a N h fi Or+ a) 0. ..40 y 0 - i1 O Z. ,d 1 V
a c3 °oa - a.0.b ct to ! H ' ,� � . o T ). � obn 5c� o 2
E � s�: U co � � cl) ° E. E E o i a) o o e' b 'V b
v� o o i . v, . O D .4 .0 ` n 0 5
o 2 1 cd > Z" h p y V 0 ' C .b 0 g i , - V - N a •
p p a) G . O O 4. a) O O WI
O ,.. o � 5 2 g . ai 3 k, W y 'b 2 0 h, 0 '� - 6 4 b0 E o 0 I' ' 5 .5
•o rn o-or. o.aa� a w , N � cAEo � -, r4 0 O Q' 0 � 0
v nU� () o a> 8. � -a . � a¢.� Q.v o N
El d' a 01 0 0 .- *t 1... s .4) • .c
w o
• cZ b4.
0 0 3
to
° E C
a p w -,
r" co 0. o 0 0. 4
O •� U
G y
O b 0
p E i.
al
a
W--'
1
cu
0
U
11 11 U 1
ig
aA
v �,� �^- a = y o e� o
+w • s. . '� b OD b E y
° CL � yy �. N D . q r�J p O s
gyp+ p 4-+ LL U P. O v ti y O N i by
c� . n y O o a.o O C a) o o.- -d y a? . 0 2 8
et 0 , m oo >P. °' o �� o.
a Sgt °- ° ° >a�g .� �r.s• °oN 8 ' • 2 o aa T. E § r 0 0 4 6
= E .n .O
d O U V A P C > 0 '�
o o h 3 0 �?� o .S 0 - o (I) a
iin .a ^" yaw F. >, � r � I. N v >' N o p
, ^° >,
y a) w U 4 .0 V .. a) P- Cp V a) �i ' (4.4
d E > , 0 6^P.� Cl .7 5•, o j 5 b 0"
fl!It! N `n �' . N p P. . .... ' 4-. A P. U cd p o vl Nv c� y .0 O rn O , . r o C 2 (..) O 0 a � O o o ... •,. o
a 0.g0= tr 4 .. c> D i 2 O 111
1 I • 0 3 0 0 0 •••°° x > O
h LL v G U U ' U
o C o . ° Cl �. ei .D U 'O N 4�
.0
C.)
a)
4.
O
V
4 c.
oA
o c
I. -d
r. o
1
cd
- i I
F
W t-i-_
W vi
1
i
V
w gyp,
I :
U
a
'° o 0 1 6' -g 4 V
. .. - a) . 0 2 -� 0 o •a L.
1 C § • >, o a�i
i a . o
QI a) a c 5 � ' > U y N ¢' b a)
w c U +'� v, p O o
CL, > a) e� o w p ' p bA � o�q flH 61 0 t a d i U "O a) a `� '� y o
it ° gb 2 ' 5 .2 on y 4. c 3 " o 0.) ¢
°
;
°
gg
cCI o g• d y w .a Ct i
40 a¢ y ., v c .? 5 c v; . o o .,c ,4 6 a fos p ..
! h ! U h i p e� CA cC cd 1 b Q , •a �o �3 N 0 o . b " � -64 .ark. a E • b a o
° U c w c . _ °' b 0 E - a 0 a p. c p N o a o
w 0 o a, c
oc °'`' c w > c4 - 0
5 on E
1 V • .0
0 0 0 ° , 0 0 0 0 Q" . 4 ' 0 .n at 2 c 6
b u ,,, y h p�} . a i 0 0 � oA 0° 0 > 0 V 4 .
.15 U w R . w r.; U ai 0 .a ci p
li d oA ..0 • - o d o o. o
a
-b
g
oo
c
-d
'5
w
P..
0
a
a
8
0
U
4
o a) g cn
A L' 3
I U 1 �b
8 •2 .� c
A aCA a a
to 0 a •.. . 0 � � / N b ILj1 + 01. VI o ==" • !gI . C"" r O • � .0 P
..0 .b y W a) > y � al p a) + '.. b._ • O ^d (d 4 -' o '.� E
,., � .� w 4., (n y • • � � a) > 6. a) ,.0 4, 041 b =d v, + fn
S'°� o� � � ' 0 ' B U � 5 3 ▪ a °, i o • w ° a a. >N 11) CO
` 8 o
IIfl! '" o f t 7s' E a 6 o A 2 o e t o cl ;o o. o � � ti� oa o4. 0 1 - _.
.el D b vs = o o ' w y V, .. CZI ° o 4 �b'o 0 ° r °� o w
CI A Q p[ V � •
y d• • A o y ° o o Q N a) .� y
0~ X v O }. v U c . v -o N o - o 'mo 0 �" 2 •c Q _ en
o W C j . C t++ b4 .... 4 a.. N cs O ^ w .0 + '�+ y f /1 U M
wo $a 0. 0 . 0$ a °oH � 41.), bc 3 0 0 . 5 0
0 0 0� 0 �� 0 ' � v 'Aoo ch 2, a. .. > > 75 ct • er = v 0 * 0 > 0 : ti 5 • ° a 2 => 0 > b o b
Z a) E W p U ^C . a, ° . j O 0 bp •.. 4Ft ° 3 V p C y N 5 0 CS I t I HII J o � '+s ed �s a 3 a ° �
ii ••- . o y c : b id c 0.. a) y z R. a 0 a) .� or >
g 4 -o ° Q 0 •.o '" as s . .a . at o ° n ro ° o O . 4, ° Eib
8 0,a. .LI0 1:.,) .t.. ° r) u o 5�a, o � 2 , -,
� � , .a a.a.
es . 0.... o ss� N as ai oo a 3 i 3 o ° �. 0. ,0 -
Cn A CO vACO aw aU) A a� w Csao {. aa H .a
co
to =I ed bO.2
0 0 oob3
1.4 is
H a z c. o. = (4. 0
o . Cl. c0 a c� o o a.
on ti a) bD W
on o ° ° g
0 a . F.. C/J w a cn `� O
F
3
en
v)
0
I
U
li ai
i -2 tt
° N
i
a A
0 0 o 0 0 - 0 "0
t0 4.4 t 1i I
L flb
i4, • CI c +� ° o . . t p. � o~ ch edd N 3 y , w o 0 0= N y
.. o u i.s 0 ,s•8 c ag'o ., o o id a, o vi -0 .s o o.� cd 0
a, cd .a ° '' o 5 .4 0 >, t o o cd ro b0
O. - . 3 . w A _.c o E a, a,. a ° o. c „ co cl r/1 ° O Od o 4 4••. -d a > o 0•c a›,8 0 c1 a E ;I. ..... > o : $ ° c
t o . c ° w - 0 ° 0 0 o o ao ° < 0'oW' �' 0 = Si n N'5 N
q 5•.'g0' > c g °.,="c 6`" v i,,,°W c ga.Z' 00 o 0 `�' ``"
p er ., &g ° i, u E � ° : 2 5 w U . 4,, i - 'o o = Go
d� .r o o ° K U , cd 0 b = _ a 0 cd . , � : ' o y ■M
'ate 8 o � v 0 s. a o N y 4 , 0 0 0. . 3 77 c = a
o 'E ° Ir) .1 00 O` c 4 , ti t - Uedr, -.0.5 .-4.ged o'y
a rn 0 a.5 y 0 a 2 0 o 4) 0 cd o g . .... w .S 3 +r+ o => U • et Z r, 40 o o , ac p cd +.. ° G w G o .0, . a 0 4* O -o �-. , 0 ° 'ed E 4,
00 4..
a o •
o°o0Q 4�� a, o Iv � <2 •0 5 ° a e ' �c.o ,• 0 ' 0 0, o 5 0 ., :' 5 ' v, = �: o
v a o b ` 5 00' ocd a,.t4az0 6 - , o...o� o U� u �4U
s o a, o N a,a •0 .ac E - v a• Go 0 ci 4 - , o cd . � 0 i- .= 0 a, >, =. >, o a A ° vi `c2
'.-, 0 o .. .. U .., A 4r a ed 3 0 b i.. 0 ti 0 o U ? 0 e la
d ° 0 w ..0 ° °
o U p, .''r •� a
P
00
0
0
00
0
O
ail
1,,
Mo
E '
0
U
45
a)
1 i
-15, i
0A o
t4) ND 50 3
4:= a
° oA o' O ° O. c .
'° c d o d a) b .v — N - 0 ...r o C7N
mi 5� . as o > o , - . . 63 bb ° 0.
o u,0 0 •
• o 5 o t p a o b .� •- c ° o 0
a cn I . w c d " ° o o o c o ° o a) a) Iv
V - >i 0 3 a) o cd . 0 8 + •0 o D a-+ ba a) , c0 a) U cA a)
a, v) g 0 co ' on o � ° a. _ ° on o � - . d - I. c
A. w ° 3 3 U° v an >, a) C o 0
AT w cd •4`...d � c 'd '> b y U p o .G a E C)
a, b a, ,, b ° �-
0 N •, y GL 2 Q • ++ 1•" Q U a) fin •• • °
0 a ° , ►.o1a.a.o5 a) a) a)a. co 0.. 2 cn
�, -d o 0 ., E4 U 0 3 a al.
s a) E ':r b o. y «t g= O , 4? cep 71 S o
• moo � •moo 0o. an ado ° a °' • ` z) y > , c
0 -o Ex. v
o • >, 0 b
• a w a
as o y on ' � ,w se� . c b o w ° aN
aV o o �, 5 0 - � i :v o 0 3V3 5 0� o w 4o ° -0:
c ° = 0 05(44 x ' � b ° c o • 6 'tb5 08
= a ;C , to o o `4-, oA g a. �' , � a) C 3 o- a) o,. o ;_o 6
Z o - o �� ° E 2 S ' �o2 0 01).4 .5 �.r on
a o �'° o.o o 0 0 ¢•.� 5 a op as o•v 0 a ° o = ct a) .b Q A w a 5 N ., a) . • ' a) 2 U .5 ' >, i a. 0 0 0 o o . 0 V .• 2 cd .0 5 b a) + oA a. El •v o t jU a) o � y ..'b opt" 0 4 > Ea-+ ." t 5 � �� o
U '
a W 1-b E o Ili
a) 0 o cs E •O ^ 'C op g t
°a)! a) p 53 ,5 • ,0 0 ¢" 4 Q. A a, V 8 a. o Vie` 1 . 5 w
5 0 - • o • • 5 ' o cn 5353 -v ° .c o -o o p�qq o c v
Oct 3 a Ti •v 0. ..0 CY a a ) ) — � V c o o S ¢ 3 ,5
c.. p L"
o es �w
U y .. fl —O to
et g pOp.5
� v ] �•a o
�' .4 N
E, o. y o. 4 g o
aq d 0.0 y) 00.2
0 5 0 • 5 5 • 5 5
a� C.) .5353
a
a
r i l
_. 5 CI.
kri otr;
0
i
E
a
U
...., r
ii.;.
1 i
1 cn
g .
ct
bo
. o
0
a A a A aA a "..,
-o to 0 o b F.
p � 3 c c> 5 ,,0 o* v,
�, o Q rs. v ,
iI1 an 0 .
o
t i o ° b (t -v 0 ° � ' o a . A " y 4,4,' y c� . y by � i. p g 1. w ..... U 0 O 4. • g, N
- ..s i bUQ ° ° ° 0 s o = E - 0.-0 09 o 0 o cn
p F., j ,1 0 - o w O a) �. I w 0 0 o. c , le > O .c
Itt A bp O Q. w 49 "C O f U O. 0. y y a M
G0 o ► O C 04 t +5 O . C U U i. `' g @ 'U 3 . c) bA .0 c�
e V 'C V ' U '� e� y O C]. y U "O v C
0 `-' a >, - c, . �' c. °� 2 a 4) a .� -- v a . 0 a3 2 - c . 0 .y a. t ' „ . 5 E E ., N •. 'o .- — 28 ' � a
0 .c am v
1-4 'VZ Nw 0 � +, r, U > , 6AcV 4-4 7E1 ma c - ,4 erl
b G VI U O °: 4 • O O °' O 4 g N
z . �" ,-, v `- w
C bA S h to O .O 0 ss 0 4r 0o ° Q Q ° ,, 0 O +.+ e:s t o 0 y,, J.) 1-- O
y 0 �? = • p• •-- 'o co ° 0 _ 0 0 o y U U a y V e3 U - CJ v
2 w o CA w co A; w -o a g A o. V U U u o 0 . = b • o b •o
..0 U 'C7 ai Ts. c� .fl ci - ci Gi , 0 c at ' v i i O. . c. e U = 0
I-. 0¢ .c 0 a ?-b a
U
O 4.4 4 r 4 .
e.4 g it g �'"� O ° E O co
en
1:4 ° . tsr , a
0 to
O o . ° o .—° o
a . n a . a
o
III
1
0
Cr)
4
42 g
0 1
Q..
A
b
m
E o
0 --.
0 z - .c
.7a o a" �v�
ct. 0 0) '
cd ° y y
O U v 0\ cn
. - .o p cd .. p a)
rl —. cat = w b 0
E •�
'v > e . o y
A ' ° 4 c
CI) 03 = 1:,
0 c
00
b
H
b8.,
1 3 2