PC 2006/05/01 (2)Anaheim Planning
Commission Agenda
Monday, May 1, 2006
Council Chamber, City Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard. Anaheim. California
Chairman: Gail Eastman
Chairman Pro - Tempore: Cecilia Flores
Commissioners: Kelly Buffa, Joseph Karaki
Panky Romero, Pat Velasquez, (One Vacancy)
. Call To Order
Preliminary Plan Review 1:00 P.M.
• Staff update to Commission on various City developments and issues
(As requested by Planning Commission)
• Preliminary Plan Review for items on the May 1, 2006 agenda
Recess To Afternoon Public Hearing Session
• Reconvene To Public Hearing 2:30 P.M.
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any
item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to
the secretary.
Pledge Of Allegiance
Public Comments
Consent Calendar
Public Hearing Items
. Adjournment
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following
e -mail address: plan ningcommission(Wanaheim.net
H: \docs \clerical \agendas \050106.doc (05/01/06)
Page 1
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 2:30 P.M.
Public Comments:
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the
Anaheim Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing
items.
Planning Commission Appointment:
Request For Consideration Of Potential Appointment Of Planning Commission Alternate For The
Following:
• Utilities Underground Conversion Subcommittee
Consent Calendar:
The items on the Consent Calendar will be acted on by one roll call vote. There will be no separate
discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Planning
Commission, staff or the public request the item to be discussed and /or removed from the Consent
Calendar for separate action.
7A. Receiving and approving the Minutes from the Planning Commission
Meeting of April 17, 2006. (Motion)
H: \docs \clerical \agendas \050106.doc (05/01/06)
Page 2
2a.
CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
Request for
2b.
WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
continuance to
2c.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005.05060
May 15, 2006
2d.
DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
OR NECESSITY NO. 2005 -00024
Owner: Pietro T. Trozzi, 9471 Gateshead Drive, Huntington Beach,
CA 92646
Agent: Rick Solberg, Solberg & Associates, 201 East Center
Street, Anaheim, CA 92805
Location: 3242 West Lincoln Avenue: Property is approximately 1.5
acres, located east and south of the southeast corner of
Westchester Drive and Lincoln Avenue, having frontages of
136 feet on the south side of Lincoln Avenue and 187 feet
on the east side of Westchester Drive (Maria's Pizzeria and
Billiards).
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005 -05060 — Request to permit a restaurant
and billiard facility with the on- premises sale and consumption of beer and
wine with waiver of minimum number of required parking spaces.
Determination of Public Convenience and Necessity No. 2005 -00024 —
Request to permit sales of beer and wine for on- premises consumption
within a restaurant and billiard facility.
Continued from the February 6, March 20, and April 17, 2006, Planning
Commission meetings.
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
Project Planner:
( kwona2rrD anaheim.nefl
Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution No.
3a.
CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
3b.
WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
3c.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006.05069
Owner: Public Storage Euro Partnership, 701 Western Avenue,
Glendale, CA 91201
Agent: Dean Grobbelaar, Pacific Planning Group, INC., 23412
Moulton Parkway, Suite 140, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
Location: 4880 East La Palma Avenue: Property is approximately
3.5 acres, having a frontage of 340 feet on the south side of
La Palma Avenue and is located 115 feet west of the
centerline of Manassero Street.
Request to construct a five -story self storage building with building
heights exceeding 60 feet with waivers of (a) maximum floor area ratio
and (b) maximum fence height.
Continued from the March 20, and April 17, 2006, Planning Commission
meetings.
Project Planner.
Qnixon@ anaheim. net)
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
H: \docs \clerical \agendas \050106.doc (05/01/06)
Page 3
4a. CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CLASS 11 (READVERTISED)
Request for
continuance to
4b. VARIANCE NO. 2006 -04681
May 15, 2006
Owner: Karl A. Bergstrom, 1662 La Loma Drive, Santa Ana, CA
92705
Agent: Steve Sheldon, 901 Dove Street, Suite 140, Newport
Beach, CA 92660
Location: 200 West Alro Way: Property is approximately 1.5 acres,
having a frontage of 100 feet on the south side of Alro Way
and is located 115 feet east of the centerline of Manchester
Avenue (Bergstroms).
Request waivers of (a) continuation and termination of legal non-
conforming signs and (b) maximum letter height for wall signage to retain
one non - conforming business identification pole sign with electronic
message board and one non - conforming business identification wall sign.
Continued from the April 3, 2006, Planning Commission meeting.
Project Planner:
(dherrick@ an aheim. n et)
Variance Resolution No.
5a. CEGA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
5b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05077
Owner: Southern California Edison, Robert Teran, 2244 Walnut
Grove Ave, Rosemead, CA 91770
Agent: John Koos, Core Communications, 1509 Allyson Court,
Brea, CA 92821
Location: 2711 West Yale Avenue: Property is approximately 3.5
acres, having a frontage of 265 feet on the north side of
Yale Avenue, and is located 139 feet west of the centerline
of La Reina Street (Southern California Edison Easement).
Request to permit a telecommunications facility on an existing Southern
California Edison lattice tower with accessory ground mounted
equipment. Project Planner.
(dherrick@ an aheim. n et)
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
H: \docs \cle rical\age ndas \050106.doc (05/01/06)
Page 4
6a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
6b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006.05080
Owner: Southern California Edison Company, 2131 Walnut Grove
Ave, Rosemead, CA 91770
Agent: John Koos, Core Communication, 1509 Allyson Court,
Brea, CA 92821
Location: 2719 West Ball Road: Property is approximately 7.77
acres, having a frontage of 265 feet on the north side of
Ball Road, and is located 146 feet west of the centerline of
Sherrill Street.
Request to permit a telecommunications facility on an existing Southern
California Edison tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment.
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
7a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
7b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006.05079
Owner: Idelfonso G. Marquez Jr. and Cheryl Y. Marquez, 1835
South Lewis Street, Anaheim, CA 92805
Agent: MVA Architects, 2151 Michelson Drive, Suite 140, Irvine,
CA 92612
Location: 1835 South Lewis Street: Property is approximately 0.5
acre, having a frontage of 117 feet on the west side of
Lewis Street and is located 517 feet south of the centerline
of Katella Avenue.
Request to permit a mortuary to cremate and embalm human remains in
an existing industrial building.
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
H: \docs \clerical \agendas \050106.doc
Project Planner.
(kwong2 @anaheim.net)
Project Planner.
(kwong2 @anaheim. net)
(05/01/06)
Page 5
8a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2006 -00176
Agent: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, 201 South Anaheim
Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805
Location: (No address): Parcel A: Property is approximately 1.3
acres located west of the terminus of Glenoaks Avenue at
the intersection of Greenleaf Avenue and Glenoaks
Avenue, with a frontage of 436 feet on the west side of
Greenleaf Avenue (No address). Parcel B: Property is
approximately 2.6 acres located south of the terminus of
Chippewa Avenue at the intersection of Crescent Avenue
and Chippewa Avenue, with a frontage of 413 feet on the
south side of Crescent Avenue (No address). Parcel C:
Property is approximately 0.84 acre located at the northeast
corner of Wilshire Avenue and Pearl Street-
City-initiated (Community Development Department) request to reclassify:
(a) Parcel A from the RM -3 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone to the RM-
4 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone, or a less intense zone, (b) Parcel B
from the RS -3 (Single - Family, Residential) zone to the RM -3 (Multiple -
Family, Residential) zone, or a less intense zone, and (c) Parcel C from
the C -G (General Commercial) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple - Family,
Residential) zone, or a less intense zone to allow for the future
construction of three affordable housing projects.
Reclassification Resolution No.
9a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY - APPROVED)
9b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003.04685
(TRACKING NO. CUP2006- 05078)
Owner: Carlo John Lugaro Trust, 1145 Glen View Drive, Fullerton,
CA 92835-4032
Agent: Joseph Karaki, Western States Engineering, 4887 East La
Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92807
Location: 590 North Magnolia Avenue Property is approximately
0.8 acre and is located at the southeast corner of Magnolia
Avenue and Crescent Avenue.
Request to modify exhibits and amend or delete conditions of approval to
modify a previously- approved automobile car wash facility with accessory
fast food restaurant and accessory retail sales to permit a self serve car
wash facility.
Conditional Use Permit Resolution No.
H: \docs \clerical \agendas \050106.doc
Project Planner.
(dsee @anaheim.net)
Request for
continuance to
May 15, 2006
Project Planner.
Qpramiroz @anaheim. net)
(05/01/06)
Page 6
Adjourn To Monday, May 15, 2006 at 1:00 P.M. for Preliminary
Plan Review.
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
4:00 p.m. April 28, 2006
(TIME) (DATE)
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND
COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK
SIGNED: (Original Siqned by Danielle C. Masciel)
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only
those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written
correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use
Permits and Variances will be final 22 days after Planning Commission action and any action regarding
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 days after Planning Commission action unless a timely
appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied
by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing
before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing.
I_10 1_1:IgLTA 1,I_10 [K410] LTA LTA 1619 to] 0
In compliance with the American with Disabilities Act, if you need special assistance to participate in this
meeting, please contact the Planning Department, (714) 765 -5139. Notification no later than 10:00 a.m.
on the Friday before the meeting will enable the City to make reasonable arrangements to ensure
accessibility to this meeting.
Recorded decision information is available 24 hours a day by calling the Planning Department's
Automated Telephone System at 714- 765 -5139.
H: \docs \clerical \agendas \050106.doc (05/01/06)
Page 7
SCHEDULE
2006
May 15
11 May 31 (Wed) 11
June 12
June 26
July 10
July 24
August 7
August 21
11 September 6 (Wed) 11
September 18
October 2
October 16
October 30
November 13
November 27
December 11
II December 27 (Wed) II
H: \docs \cle dcal \agendas \050106.doc (05/01/06)
Page 8
Item No. 2
RS- A- 43,000)
T -CUP 20 01 -044 59
T -CUP 2001 -04437
RCL 82 -83 -28
CUP 4181
CUP 527
MOBILE HOME
PARK
T
RCL 86 -87 -35
(Res of Int
to RM -3000)
1 DU
TLUP200164451
TLUP200164431
T -VAR 2001 044v
VAR 2355
CUP 4181
ELEMENTARY SCHOOL
. . . . . . . .
Commercial Corridors
C -G
CL 62 -63 -1
RCL 84 -85 -16
RCL 56 -57 -7
GG
RCL SS67�7
CL 63-6446
T -CUP
RM -2 -
CUP 912
2001 -04370
RCL 79-80 -04
CUP 4164
CUP 4140
CUP 1691
RM-4
STAURANT
VAR 3117 -
O
C -G
VAR 3102
O
cb
A WES
MEDICAL
OWNHOMES
9AL
14 DU
iOP
PROOFFSG
J J
1014
Commercial Corridors
C -G
CUP2747
RCL 84 -85 -16
VAR 3451
GG
RCL SS67�7
CL 63-6446
RCL 63x437
MP35M
CUP 912
MP35M
VETERI-
CUP 4164
NARIAN
RM-4
STAURANT
REST_
v
RCL 87 -88-55
cb
VAR 3800
N
J J
RM-4
RCL 78 -79-15
VAR 3051
RCL 59 -604
VAR 1380
APARTMENTS
194 DU
RCL R 0
1380
VAR 1380
OELDEL M�
T
CUP 3440
CUP 2405
SENIOR CITIZEN
APARTMENTS
135 DU
LINCOLN AVE
[-0-136'-
C -G
IGIIDfS:iU1
CUP 2138
PCN 20M MD24 (CUP 1(
(VAR 23(
SHOPPING. CENTER
CUP 414
VAR 1726 S
CUP 404
APARTMENTS
19 DU EACH
RM-4
Conditional Use Permit No. 2005 -05060 Subject Property
Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2005 -00024 Date May 1, 2006
Scale V=200'
Requested By PIETRO T. TROZZI Q.S. No. 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005 -05060 - REQUEST TO PERMIT A RESTAURANT AND BILLIARD
FACILITY WITH ON- PREMISES SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF BEER AND WINE WITH WAIVER OF
MINIMUM NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING SPACES.
RM-4
RCL 63 -64 -19
VAR 1596
31 DU
RM-4
CUP2747
RCL 84 -85 -16
VAR 3451
GG
RCL SS67�7
60 DU APTS.
RCL 63x437
MP35M
CUP 912
MP35M
VETERI-
RM4
NARIAN
LUBE
GG CUP 1026
RCL 6566-96 VAR 2752
CUP 2168 VAR 1771
CUP 1622 CARWASHR2EST_
CUP 1458
DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2005 -00024 -TO PERMIT SALES OF
BEER AND WINE FOR ON- PREMISES CONSUMPTION WITHIN A RESTAURANT AND BILLIARD FACILITY.
3242 West Lincoln Avenue - Maria's Pizzeria and Billiards 2150
CUP2747
GG
' CUP 1900
RCL 6364131
CUP822
MP35M
MP35M
CUP 1783
RM4
I VAR 2437
RCL 73 -74 -33
W DONALDS
REST_
APARTMENTS
GG CUP 1026
RCL 6566-96 VAR 2752
CUP 2168 VAR 1771
CUP 1622 CARWASHR2EST_
CUP 1458
DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2005 -00024 -TO PERMIT SALES OF
BEER AND WINE FOR ON- PREMISES CONSUMPTION WITHIN A RESTAURANT AND BILLIARD FACILITY.
3242 West Lincoln Avenue - Maria's Pizzeria and Billiards 2150
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 2
2a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Motion for continuance)
2b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
2c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2005 -05060
2d. DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR
NECESSITY NO. 2005 -00024
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This irregularly- shaped, 1.5 -acre property is located east and south of the southeast corner
of Westchester Drive and Lincoln Avenue, with a frontage of 136 feet on the south side of
Lincoln Avenue and a frontage of 187 feet on the east side of Westchester Drive (3242 West
Lincoln Avenue — Maria's Pizzeria and Billiards).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of the following:
(a) Conditional Use Permit No. 2005 -05060 to permit a billiard facility and on- premises sale
and consumption of beer and wine in conjunction with a full - service restaurant under
authority of Code Section No. 18.08.030.040 with waiver of:
SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010
Minimum number of parking spaces
(114 required; 102 existing and
recommended by staff)
(b) Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2005 -00024 to permit the retail
sales of beer and wine for on- premises consumption in conjunction with a full - service
restaurant. (This item has been withdrawn since this determination is made by ABC in
conjunction with a Type 41 (restaurant) license)
BACKGROUND:
(3) This property is developed with a 13 -unit commercial retail shopping center and is zoned
C -G (General Commercial). The Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Low -
Medium Density Residential land uses. The Anaheim General Plan further designates
properties in all directions for Medium Density Residential land uses. This property is
located within the Merged Redevelopment Area.
(4) This item was continued from the February 6, March 20, and April 17, 2006, Planning
Commission meetings to allow the applicant to redesign the floor plan. The agent,
Rick Solberg, has submitted the attached letter dated, April 19, 2006, requesting a
further continuance to the May 15, 2006, Commission meeting to allow for time for
advertisement of a new request and to revise floor plans.
RECOMMENDATION:
(5) That the Commission, by motion, continue this item to the May 15, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting.
Srcup2005- 05060klwco nt5106. doc
Page 1
F- ARM1 1 — M , MIMIi USM
4/19/06
Kim Wong
Project Planner
City of Anaheim
RE: 3242 Lincoln Ave.
Kim, we request that our CUP 2005 -05060 submittal be continued from the May
1 meeting and be placed on the agenda for the May 15 meeting. We are
revising our design to subdivide the proposed leasehold to two spaces. One would
be a 3,000 sf Italian restaurant serving alcohol and the remaining 2,000 +/- sf
would be a retail leasehold
Thank you for facilitating this request.
Sincerely,
Rick Solberg
Item No. 3
SP 94 -1 (SC)
'
DA 2
RCL 65 -66 -24 (29)
RCL 65 -66 -13
CUP 2922
0J
CUP 3752
LU
H
VAR 3838
w
SP 94 -1 (SC)
LU SP 94 -1 (SC)
VAR 2878
2 24
LU RCL 65 -66- 24(29)
CATELLUS
RCL 65
(
RCL 65 -66 -1
CORPORATE CENTER
O
CUP 2004 -04945
~ CUP 2922
SMALL INDUSTRIAL
W
CUP 3010
U) VAR 3838
FIRMS
O
VAR4133
VAR 2878
Y VAR 2878
O
(CUP 2003 - 04793)
0 SMALL INDUSTRIAL
Z
CHURCH
FIRM
Z
Q
2
LA PALMA AVENUE
�— 340'
115'
J
U 2T SP 941 SC
.. - � RCL 66�7�4
2
SP 94 -1 (SC)
lt M (Res. of Intent to ML)
v�M
2 °D O
°D J
RCL 66-67-64 (10)
S P 94 -1 (SC) SP 94 -1 (SC)
c° c° RCL 66 -67 -63
M M(
_ CUP 2006 -05069
DA 2 DA 2
aU °U AJAX CEMENT
(6 E (oz
M CUP 3918
in
RCL 66 -67- 64(10) RCL 66 -67 -64 (10)
f
COMPANY
M _ �°—
J ,� J Y
v VAR 3287
MTI LING VAR 2323
U UQ
o[a
PS
SMALL
IND
m
PUBLIC
FIRR
STORAGE
RFOF
WO R T P RO✓
HF
g87- 4R Fq �Tq
T
<P
RCL 70 -71 -47
(Res of Intent to ML)
RCL 70 -71 -46
N
ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE SCENIC CORRIDOR (SC) OVERLAY ZONE.
Conditional Use Permit No.
2006 -05069
Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Requested By: PUBLIC STORAGE EURO PARTNERSHIP
Q.S. No. 166
4880 East La Palma Avenue
10005
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05069
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Requested By: PUBLIC STORAGE EURO PARTNERSHIP Q.S. No. 166
4880 East La Palma Avenue
10005
ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE SCENIC CORRIDOR (SC) OVERLAY ZONE. Date ofAerial Photo:
July 2005
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
3a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
(Motion)
3b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT
(Motion)
3b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05069
(Resolution)
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly- shaped 3.5 -acre property has a frontage of 340 feet on the south side of
La Palma Avenue, a maximum depth of 453 feet, and is located 115 feet west of the
centerline of Manassero Street (4880 East La Palma Avenue- Public Storage).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit under authority of Code
Section No. 18.120.070.050.0537 and 18.120.070.080.0801 to construct a five -story self -
storage building with building heights in excess of sixty (60) feet with waivers of the
following:
(a) SECTION NOS. 18.120.080.0803 Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
(0 = 5 FAR permitted, 1 FAR proposed)
(b) SECTION NO. 18.120.070.100.1001 Maximum Fence Height
(3 feet permitted; 6 feet proposed)
BACKGROUND:
(3) This item was continued from the March 20, and April 17, 2006, Commission meetings to
allow the applicant time to work with staff to address land use and design concerns.
(4) This property is currently developed with five (5) freestanding self- storage buildings. The
property is zoned SP94- 1(DA2) (SC) Northeast Industrial Area Specific Plan, Development
Area 2 (Expanded Industrial Area), Scenic Corridor Overlay. This property is also within the
merged redevelopment area (Alpha). The Anaheim General Plan designates this property
for Office -Low land uses. Surrounding properties to the east and west are also designated
for Office -Low land uses; to the north (across La Palma Avenue) for Industrial land uses,
and to the south for Open Space -Water land uses.
(5) The existing one -story self storage facility is a legal nonconforming facility that was
constructed prior to the adoption of the Northeast Area Specific Plan which requires a
conditional use permit for self storage facilities.
PREVIOUS ZONING ACTIONS:
(6) The following zoning actions pertain to this property:
(a) Conditional Use Permit No. 3918 (to permit an unmanned 420 square foot cellular
communications facility within an existing self storage business with an approximate 47
foot high triangular monument tower with 12 flush mounted antennas) was approved by
the Planning Commission on May 28, 1997 for a period of 5 years. This conditional use
permit has expired.
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 1
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
(b) Variance No. 3287(to waive the minimum number of parking spaces and maximum
fence height to construct a self- storage facility with caretakers unit) was approved by
the Planning Commission on September 20, 1982.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL:
(7) The applicant requests a conditional use permit to expand an existing self storage facility from
67,937 square feet to 174,607 square feet. The 152,796 square foot site currently consists of
seven (7) single story self storage buildings and one (1) office /retail building. This proposal
includes the partial demolition of five (5) existing buildings and the office /retail area (27,261
square feet) and the construction of a new five (5) story self storage building totaling 133,931
square feet.
(8) The site plan (Exhibit No. 1) indicates the following setbacks for the new five (5) story self -
storage building:
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 2
Code
Code
Direction
Required /Proposed
Required /Proposed
Building Setback
Landscape Setback
North (adjacent to La
65 feet/65 feet
20 feet/20 feet
Palma Avenue)
South
0 feet/ 240 feet
0 feet/15 feet
West
T 0 feet/56 feet
0 feet/0 feet
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 2
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
(9) Vehicular access to the site would be provided by one (1) driveway to be accessed from La
Palma Ave. The site plan also indicates 47 total parking spaces available for this self- storage
facility. Code requires 47 spaces based on the following chart:
Code
Code
Direction
Required /Proposed
Required /Proposed
PARKING RATIO
Building Setback
Landscape Setback
East
0 feet/80 feet
0 feet/0 feet
(9) Vehicular access to the site would be provided by one (1) driveway to be accessed from La
Palma Ave. The site plan also indicates 47 total parking spaces available for this self- storage
facility. Code requires 47 spaces based on the following chart:
(10) The floor plans (Exhibit Nos. 2 through 7) indicate each of the five (5) levels of the new building
and a roof plan. The first floor would have a lobby located at the front entrance, a 1,440 square
foot retail /office area and restrooms. The remaining area would be occupied with storage
units. Floors two (2) through five (5) would consist of storage areas. There are 994 storage
units proposed throughout the five (5) story structure. The roof plan indicates the roof
mounted equipment located in the middle of the roof with a six (6) foot high screen proposed.
(11) The elevation plans (Exhibit Nos. 2 and 3) indicate a five (5) story industrial building with a
maximum height of 66 feet with elevator shafts, stair wells, roof mounted equipment and roof
peaks extending beyond the 60 -foot height limit. Elevation plans indicate that the building
would consist of Navajo white, relaxed khaki, and colonial revival stone colors painted on pre-
fabricated metal panels. Plans further indicate orange colored standing seam metal roofs and
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 3
CODE - REQUIRED
USE
SQUARE FEET
PARKING RATIO
PARKING
REQUIRED
(per 1,000 sq. ft.)
Existing Self-
40,676
.27 space
11
storage buildings
Proposed five -story
133,931
.27 space
36
self-storage buildin
TOTAL
174,607
47
(10) The floor plans (Exhibit Nos. 2 through 7) indicate each of the five (5) levels of the new building
and a roof plan. The first floor would have a lobby located at the front entrance, a 1,440 square
foot retail /office area and restrooms. The remaining area would be occupied with storage
units. Floors two (2) through five (5) would consist of storage areas. There are 994 storage
units proposed throughout the five (5) story structure. The roof plan indicates the roof
mounted equipment located in the middle of the roof with a six (6) foot high screen proposed.
(11) The elevation plans (Exhibit Nos. 2 and 3) indicate a five (5) story industrial building with a
maximum height of 66 feet with elevator shafts, stair wells, roof mounted equipment and roof
peaks extending beyond the 60 -foot height limit. Elevation plans indicate that the building
would consist of Navajo white, relaxed khaki, and colonial revival stone colors painted on pre-
fabricated metal panels. Plans further indicate orange colored standing seam metal roofs and
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 3
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
pre- fabricated fixed dark brown spandrel glass windows in natural aluminum frames located on
all four elevations. An eight (8) foot deep overhang is provided overthe main entrance door.
The elevation plans indicate there would be clear glass windows on all five stories at the
northeast portion of the building providing a view of the orange self storage unit doors located
within the building.
M
a.
.1�_ • JL y
lbdFMtlen pe Felm�M���
(12) The height of the building would be at 60 feet with a six (6) foot high encroachment to
provide for the extra room necessary for elevator shafts, stair wells, roof mounted
equipment and roof peaks. Code indicates that
"structures for the housing of elevators, stairways, tanks, ventilating fans, or similar
equipment required to operate and maintain the buildings, and fire or parapet walls,
skylights, flagpoles, chimneys, smokestacks or similar projections may be erected
above the height limits prescribed in the underlying zone, provided the projections are
permitted uses in the underlying zone and the projection does not exceed the height
limit by more than eight (8) feet."
The plans also indicate the standing seam metal roofing would encroach over the 60 foot
maximum height. The above provision does not include roof projections and therefore, the
request for conditional use permit also includes a request for building heights exceeding
(60) sixty feet.
(13) The landscape plan (Exhibit No.11) indicates a 10 -foot wide landscape planter along La
Palma Avenue. The landscape plan consists of a variety of minimum 24 -inch box size
trees, shrubbery, and ground cover throughout the landscaped area. The code requires
the first ten (10) feet behind the ROW shall be landscaped with a minimum of one (1) tree
planted for every twenty (20) linear feet of street frontage (17 trees on La Palma Avenue
required; 13 trees proposed). The code also states that a minimum three (3) foot high shrub
screen shall be planted parallel to the ROW. The plans comply with this provision. Code
further requires that a minimum of one (1) tree shall be planted per four (4) parking stalls,
and a minimum of one (1) additional tree shall be provided for each two thousand three
hundred (2,300) square feet of area in the remaining required fifty -five (55) feet street
setback area. (12 trees required; 20 trees proposed in the parking lot and up against the
building).
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 4
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
(14) The section plan (Exhibit No. 10) indicates the roof mounted equipment would be screened
by a parapet roof and a mechanical unit screen wall that is consistent with the architecture
of the building.
(15) The sign plan (Exhibit No. 12) indicates the following characteristics:
LOCATION OF
SIZE OF SIGN (IN
PERCENTAGE OF
LETTER HEIGHT
WALL SIGN
SQUARE FEET)
WALL FRONTAGE
North elevation
1 foot 3'/: inches
48 s.f.
004%
(main entrance)
Upper northeast
24 Inches
80 s.f.
006%
elevation
Upper east
24 Inches
80 s.f.
01%
elevation
Code permits wall signs not to exceed ten percent of the building elevation or 200 square
feet, whichever is less. The proposed cabinet wall signs would have an orange and purple
background with white letters. The proposed signs comply with the height and area
requirements of the code.
(16) The applicant has indicated in the letter of operation that the proposed hours of operation
would be from 6 a.m. to 9 p.m., seven (7) days a week. There would be one employee per
shift with a total of one shift per day. The operator's duties include the surveillance of the
interior and exterior self- storage units and the sales of tape and boxes from the office area.
The exterior self- storage units are accessible by driving to the unit. The proposed interior
self- storage units would be accessed through an access point located at the entrance on
the north elevation. The customer is able to use a "push cart" to transport their belongings
to an elevator to the designated floor. All floors would be climate controlled.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(17) Staff has reviewed the proposal and the Initial Study (a copy of which is available for
review in the Planning Department) and finds no significant environmental impact and,
therefore, recommends that a Negative Declaration be approved upon a finding by the
Commission that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency;
and that it has considered the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments
received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the Initial
Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment-
EVALUATION
(18) Self- storage facilities and building heights in excess of sixty feet are permitted in the
SP94 -1, DA2 zone subject to the approval of a conditional use permit.
(19) One of the objectives of the General Plan is to "Plan land uses that preserve and enhance
Anaheim's economic assets." In order to facilitate that objective, the General Plan Land
Use Element enhances The Canyon's industrial base with limited strategically located
office and mixed uses that take advantage of the area's location, visibility and access.
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 5
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
This property is located within one of those areas, therefore the land use designation for
this site was changed from Industrial to Office -Low during the comprehensive General
Plan update. In addition, one General Plan goal is to maintain and enhance the canyon
area as one of the most prominent business centers in Orange County. Policies to support
this goal are to protect and enhance the integrity and desirability of industrial sites and
encourage additional office development along the south side of La Palma Avenue. Staff
is concerned that the proposed development is not consistent with the long -term goals to
strengthen the area as a technology center. The proposed modification and expansion of
the existing self storage facility (from 67,937 square feet to 174,607 square feet) is a
significant redevelopment of a site in a manner that is not consistent with this General Plan
goal and related objectives.
(20) The substantial expansion of the public storage facility is not consistent with the
Redevelopment Plan objectives for the Canyon Area. One of the goals for the Canyon
Area is to enhance the area by providing higher skill, higher wage employment
opportunities. There has been extensive public involvement in the infrastructure to support
the 55,000 jobs and 2,300 businesses that constitute the Canyon Business Center. The
purpose of the public improvements is to attract businesses to enhance the area. A self -
storage use of this size and scale does not encourage office developments in conformance
with the General Plan.
(21) On, August 17, 1998, the Planning Commission approved and the City Council concurred
on a policy relating to the appropriate location for self storage facilities. It states that the
"unique and opportune design features of self- storage facilities are most appropriate for
irregularly- shaped properties which may further be constrained by accessibility or visibility
and which may not be suitable for conventional types of development-" The size and shape
of this site is well suited to conventional type of office development in conformance with the
general plan, therefore, this proposal does not meet the Council policy on location of self
storage facilities. Although the site is currently developed with a self storage facility, the
current request triples the size of the existing facility which significantly extends the life of
the self storage use at this location and reduces the possibility of establishing land uses
that are consistent with the General Plan and Redevelopment Plan.
(22) The request for conditional use permit also includes a request for a 66 -foot high building.
Section 18.120.070.080.0801 of the Northeast Area Specific Plan allows building heights in
excess of 60 feet subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. The applicant
indicates that the additional height would be for elevator shafts, stair wells, roof mounted
equipment and roof peaks. Within an existing built environment, the proposed 66 foot
maximum height building would look out of scale against the surrounding area. Although
the code allows for a structure up to 60 feet in height, a 66 -foot high building would be out
of scale to the surrounding area and could adversely affect adjoining land uses by
overshadowing the rest of the area with a massive structure.
(23) Waiver (a) pertains to the floor area ratio (FAR). Code permits a maximum FAR of 0.5 for
uses in the SP94 -1, DA2 Zone, and a 1.1 FAR is proposed. The applicant indicates the
attached Justification of Waiver form that there are special circumstances applicable to the
property relating to size, shape and configuration. The applicant also explains that the use
of this storage facility would be for household goods and technology storage that must be
stored in a climate controlled atmosphere. Therefore, the applicant would like to expand the
floor area on the site in order to accommodate these needs.
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 6
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
(24) Due to the substantial FAR increase, a traffic trip count was conducted by the City's
independent traffic and parking consultant on March 8, 2006. The consultant compared the
number of trips anticipated for an industrial use at the maximum FAR for the parcel and the
number of trips anticipated for the proposed self storage facility. For a typical industrial
building at the permitted 0.5 FAR on the subject site, the number of trips per day at peak
hours would be 70 a.m., 75 p.m., and 531 average daily trips. The number of trips per day
for the proposed 1.1 FAR for a mini - warehouse at peak hours would be 26 a.m., 45 p.m.,
and 437 average daily trips. Therefore, the proposed self storage facility at 1.1 FAR would
have on average, 44 a.m., 30 p.m., and 94 average daily trips less than an industrial use
developed at the permitted 0.5 FAR.
(25) With the FAR limitation within the expanded Industrial Area (Development Area 2), it is
anticipated that most of the buildings constructed for uses permitted in the zone would not
result in the height proposed under this request. The proposed building without the existing
single -story structures in the rear is at an FAR of 0.89 which exceeds what would be
permitted for surrounding properties. The adjacent buildings surrounding this parcel are at
one and two stones. Although there are no significant traffic impacts relating to the
additional FAR requested, the extreme deviation from code results in a building that is 5-
stories in height compared to the existing one- and two -story industrial buildings or any
future office buildings. Staff has concerns over such a large deviation from code as the
FAR increase translates into building mass which results in a building that would be out of
characterwith the surrounding area. In addition, the property is rectangularly- shaped and
is not constrained by topography, location or surroundings. There are also no properties in
the immediate vicinity that enjoys the privilege that is requested with this waiver.
(26) Waiver (b) pertains to the maximum height of a fence within the street setback along La
Palma Avenue. Plans propose a 10 -foot wide landscaped setback with a six (6) foot high
automatic sliding wrought iron gate at the back of the landscaped setback. Code requires a
minimum 10 -foot wide fully landscaped setback and permits a 3 -foot high decorative fence
at the back of the 10 -foot landscaped setback. The applicant indicates in the attached
Justification of Waiver form that site constraints limit the placement of the proposed gate.
Staff is supportive of the proposed fence waiver since the proposed location and height is
consistent with permitted fences in the I (Industrial) zone (base zone for this property) in the
rest of the City. However, due to staffs recommendation of denial for the proposed five (5)
story self- storage facility, staff also recommends denial of this waiver since it would no
longer be necessary.
(27) The proposed self storage facility expansion and associated waivers would result in a
project that is not consistent with the City's General Plan, Redevelopment Plan and Council
Policy. Given the policy direction contained in these adopted documents, and the proposed
project's inconsistency with those documents, staff recommends denial of this project-
FINDINGS
(28) When practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships result from strict enforcement of the
Zoning Code, a modification may be granted for the purpose of assuring that no property,
because of special circumstances applicable to it, shall be deprived of privileges commonly
enjoyed by other properties in the same vicinity and zone. The sole purpose of any code
waiver is to prevent discrimination and none shall be approved which would have the effect
of granting a special privilege not shared by other similar properties. Therefore, before any
code waiver is granted by the Planning Commission, it shall be shown:
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 7
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
(a) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property such as size, shape,
topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned
properties in the vicinity; and
(b) That strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed
by other properties under identical zoning classification in the vicinity.
(29) Before the Planning Commission grants any conditional use permit, it must make a finding
of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
(a) That the use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the
Zoning Code, or is an unlisted use as defined in Subsection .030 (Unlisted Uses
Permitted) of Section 18.66.040 (Approval Authority);
(b) That the use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
(c) That the size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
or to the health and safety;
(d) That the traffic generated by the use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
(e) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim-
RECOMMENDATION
(30) Staff recommends that, unless additional or contrary information is received during the
public hearing, and, based upon the evidence submitted to the Commission, including the
evidence presented in this staff report, and oral and written evidence presented at the
public hearing, the Planning Commission take the following actions:
(a) By motion, approve a Negative Declaration for the project;
(b) By motion, deny waiver (a) pertaining to a maximum Floor Area Ratio (.5 FAR
permitted; 1.1 FAR proposed) based on the findings that there are no special
circumstances relating to size shape or topography that apply to this property and
that this property would not be deprived of a privilege enjoyed by other properties
under the same zoning in the vicinity.
(c) By motion, deny waiver (b) pertaining to a maximum fence height (3 feet permitted; 6
feet proposed) since staff is recommending denial of this project and the waiver
would only be needed if the project is approved.
(d) By resolution, deny Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05069 to construct a five -story
self- storage building with building heights in excess of sixty (60) feet based on the
findings contained in the attached resolution.
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 8
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
IN THE EVENT THE COMMISSION CHOSES TO APPROVE THIS REQUEST, THE FOLLOWING
CONDITIONS ARE SUBMITTED BY VARIOUS CITY DEPARTMENTS, ACTING AS AN
INTERDEPARTMENTAL COMMITTEE AND ARE RECOMMENDED FOR ADOPTION BY THE
PLANNING COMMISSION.
1. That final elevation plans shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division. Said plans shall be
designed to preclude the visibility of interior storage for the individual tenants from La Palma
Avenue, reflect enhanced building materials. Any decision by staff may be appealed to the
Planning Commission as a 'Reports and Recommendations" item.
2. That there shall be no public telephones on the premises located outside the building.
3. That adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses
and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide
adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises
during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and
vehicles on -site. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Police
Department, Community Services Division approval.
4. That all trash generated from the self storage facility shall be properly contained in trash bins
located within approved trash enclosures. The number of bins shall be adequate and the trash
pick -up shall be as frequent as necessary to ensure the sanitary handling and timely removal of
refuse from the property. The Community Preservation Division of the Planning Department shall
determine the need for additional bins or additional pick -up. All costs for increasing the number of
bins or frequency of pick -up shall be paid by the business owner.
5. That any tree or other landscaping planted on -site shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event
that it is removed, damaged, diseased and /or dead.
6. That no roof - mounted balloons or other inflatable devices shall be permitted on the property.
7. That no outdoor vending machines that are visible from the public right -of -way shall be permitted on
the property.
8. That 4 -foot high street address numbers shall be displayed on the roof of the building in a color that
contrasts with the roof material. The numbers shall not be visible from the streets or adjacent
properties. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
9. That there shall be no outdoor storage permitted on the premises.
10. That roof - mounted equipment shall be screened from view in accordance with the requirements of
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.38.170 pertaining to the SP94 -1 DA2 (Northeast Industrial
Area Specific Plan, Development Area 2) Zone. Said information shall be specifically shown on
plans submitted for building permits.
11. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by the provision of regular
landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty four (24)
hours from time of occurrence.
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 9
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
12. That the design, size, and placement of the wall signage and monument signage shall be limited to
that which is shown on the exhibits submitted by the applicant and approved by the Planning
Commission. Final sign plans shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division for review and
approval as to placement, design and materials. Any decision by staff may be appealed to the
Planning Commission as a "Reports and Recommendations" item.
13. That all new backflow equipment shall be located above ground and outside of the street setback
area in a manner fully screened from all public streets. Any backflow assemblies currently installed
in a vault shall be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall
be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division in either underground vaults or
outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys.
Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by the Water Engineering
Department.
14. That all requests for new water services or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or
abandonment's of existing water services and fire lines, shall be coordinated through Water
Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
15. That since this project has a landscaping area exceeding 2,500 square feet, a separate irrigation
meter shall be installed in compliance with Chapter 10.19 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said
information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
16. That all existing water services and fire lines shall conform to current Water Service Standards
Specifications. Any water service and /or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be
upgraded if continued use if necessary or abandoned if the existing water service is no longer
needed. The owner /developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any
water service of fire line.
17. That prior to the issuance of a grading permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works
Department, Development Services Division for review and approval a Water Quality Management
Plan that:
• Addresses Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) such as minimizing impervious
areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating
reduced or "zero discharge" areas, and conserving natural areas.
• Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the Drainage Area
Management Plan.
• Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in DAMP.
• Describes the long -term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control
BMPs.
• Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long -term operation and maintenance of the
Treatment Control BMPs, and describes the mechanism for funding the long -term operation and
maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs.
18. That prior to issuance of a certificate of occupancy, the applicant shall:
• Demonstrate that all structural BMPs described in the Project WQMP have been constructed
and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications.
• Demonstrate that the applicant is prepared to implement all non - structural BMPs described in
the Project WQMP
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 10
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
• Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved Projects WQMP are available
onsite.
• Submit for review and approval by the City an Operation and Maintenance Plan for all structural
BMPs.
19. That gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner which may
adversely affect vehicular traffic in the adjacent public street. Installation of the wrought iron gate
shall conform to Engineering Standard Plan No. 609 and shall be subject to the review and
approval by the Planning Services Division. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans
submitted for building permits.
20. That the locations for future above - ground utility devices including, but not limited to, electrical
transformers, water backflow devices, gas, communications and cable devices, etc., shall be shown
on plans submitted for building permits. Plans shall also identify the specific screening treatments
of each device (i.e. landscape screening, color of walls, materials, identifiers, access points, etc.).
21. That any required relocation of City electrical facilities shall be at the developer's expense.
22. That no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage uses.
23. That plans shall be submitted to the Traffic and Transportation manager for his review and approval
showing conformance with Engineering Standard No. 115 pertaining to sight distance visibility for
the monument sign and walltfence location.
24. That plans shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division for review and approval in
conformance with the current version of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 436, and 470 pertaining to
parking standards and driveway location. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and
maintained in conformance with said plans.
25. That an on -site trash truck turn around area be provided per Engineering Standard Detail No. 476
and as required by the Maintenance Divisions. Said information shall be specifically shown on
plans submitted for building permits.
26. That a plan sheet for solid waste storage, collection and a plan for recycling shall be submitted to
the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division for review and approval.
27. That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public
Works Department and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said
storage areas shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from
adjacent streets or highways. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from graffiti
opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum one - gallon size clinging vines planted
on maximum three -foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on
the plans submitted for building permits.
28. That the project shall provide for truck deliveries on -site. Such information shall be specifically
shown on plans submitted for building permits.
29. That an Emergency Listing Card, Form ADP -281 shall be completed and submitted in a completed
form to the Anaheim Police Department.
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 11
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 3
30. That all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of the building shall be
fully screened by architectural devices and /or appropriate building materials. Said information shall
be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits.
31. That a final landscape plan shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division for review and
approval. The quantity, size and location of trees and other plant material shall comply with code.
Said plan shall also incorporate a layered landscape design along the La Palma Avenue frontage.
Any decision by staff may be appealed to the Planning Commission as a "Reports and
Recommendations" item.
32. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department Exhibit Nos. 1 through 5, and as conditioned herein.
33. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this
resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 3, 8, 10, 12, 13, 15, 19, 20, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27,
28, 30 and 31 above mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete
said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
34. That prior to issuance of a grading permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this
resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition No. 17 above - mentioned, shall be complied with.
Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section
18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
35. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 14, 16, 18, 29 and 32, above
mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be
granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
srCUP2006- 05069jkn
Page 12
[DRAFT]
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006 - * **
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05069 BE DENIED
(4880 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE — PUBLIC STORAGE)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
PARCEL 2, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A PARCEL MAP FILED IN BOOK 67, PAGE 38 OF
PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on May 1, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60
"Procedures ", to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and that the item was
continued from the March 20, and April 17 2006, meeting; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed five -story self- storage building with building heights in excess of sixty (60)
feet is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sections
18.120.070.050.0537 and 18.120.070.080.0801 with waiver of the following.
(a) SECTION NOS. 18.120.070.080.0803
Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR)
(0 = 5 FAR permitted; 1 FAR proposed)
(b) SECTION NO. 18.46.110.030
Maximum Fence Height
(3 feet permitted; 6 feet proposed)
2. That the above - mentioned waiver (a) pertaining to the maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR) to
construct a five -story self storage facility is hereby denied on the basis that the property is rectangularly -
shaped and is not constrained by topography, location or surroundings. There are also no properties in the
immediate vicinity that enjoys the privilege that is requested by this waiver. In addition, the substantial
deviation in FAR would result in a building that is out of scale with surrounding properties.
3. That the above - mentioned waiver (b) pertaining to the maximum fence height is hereby
denied because the waiver is not applicable if the request for the project is denied.
4. That the proposed substantial expansion of the existing self storage use is not consistent
with the General Plan land use designation for this site of Office -Low or the objective of the General Plan to
"Plan land uses that preserve and enhance Anaheim's economic assets" In order to facilitate that objective,
the General Plan Land Use Element enhances The Canyon's industrial base with limited strategically located
office and mixes uses that take advantage of the area's location, visibility and access. This property is
located within an area where the General Plan strives to enhance The Canyon's industrial base with office
uses as evidenced by the General Plan redesignation of this site from Industrial to Office -Low as part of the
Comprehensive General Plan Update in 2004.
5. That the proposed use is inconsistent with the General Plan goal to maintain and enhance
the Canyon Area as one of the most prominent business centers in Orange County. Policies to support this
goal are to protect and enhance the integrity and desirability of industrial sites and encourage additional
CR \PC2006 -0 -1- PC2006-
office development along the south side of La Palma Avenue. The proposed use extends the self storage
use by the significant redevelopment of the site and precludes the property from being used in a manner that
is consistent with the long -term goals to strengthen the area as a technology center.
6. That the proposed five (5) story self- storage facility with building heights in excess of sixty
feet would adversely affect the adjoining industrial land uses and the growth and development of the area in
which it is located because the building would not be in scale with the surrounding area and the land use
would not be consistent with the planned growth and development of the area.
7. That this proposal does not meet the council policy on location of self storage units. The size
and shape of this site is well suited to office development in conformance with the general plan and the site
is not constrained by accessibility or visibility.
8. That the substantial expansion of the public storage facility is not consistent with the
Redevelopment Plan objectives for the Canyon Area. One of the goals for the Canyon Area is to enhance
the area by providing higher skill, higher wage employment opportunities and the proposed use only
contributes a minimal number of employees.
9. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is not adequate to allow full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health and
safety of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim.
10. That * ** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition, and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to construct a five -story self storage building with a building height
exceeding 60 feet with waivers of (a) maximum floor area ratio and (b) maximum fence height; and does
hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment
of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received
during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments
received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does
hereby deny subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, on the basis of the aforementioned findings.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 1, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Zoning
Provisions — General" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRMAN. ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-2- PC2006-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission
held on May 1, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
VACANT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
, 2006.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC2006-
SECTION 4
Attachment - Item No. 3
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT OF
JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE /CODE WAIVER
(NOT REQUIRED FOR PARKING WAIVER)
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CODE SECTION: 18.120.070 (0803)
(A separate statement is required for each Code waiver)
PERTAINING TO: Floor Area Ratio (i.e. expansion of the existing self storage facility from 67.937SF to 174.607SF (1,1FAR)).
PLEASE READ THE FINDINGS BELOW IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE ENCLOSED FAR JUSTIFICATION LETTER
Sections 18.74.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires that before any variance or Code waiver may be granted by the
Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, the following shall be shown:
1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and
2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property of privileges
enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity.
In order to determine if such special circumstances exist, and to assist the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission to arrive
at a decision, please answer each of the following questions regarding the property for which a variance is sought, fully and as
completely as possible. If you need additional space, you may attach additional pages.
1. Are there special circumstances that apply to the property in matters such as size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings? X Yes _ No.
• If your answer is "Yes," describe the special circumstances:
Yes The existing self - storage site is uniquely situated, it is bordered by the Santa Ana river channel in the rear a gravel
operation on west side and a lumber yard to the east The gravel operation and lumber yard makes the existing site less
desirable for office type uses due the adjacent uses heavy industrial nature Increasing the density of a self - storage use on a
site currently developed with the same use adds supply to the market without displacing other uses such as retail or
manufacturing.
2. Are the special circumstances that apply to the property different from other properties in the vicinity which are in the
same zone as your property? X Yes _ No
If your answer is "yes," describe how the property is different
• The existing self - storage site is uniquely situated. The site is bordered by the Santa Ana river channel in the rear, a gravel
operation on the western boundary and a lumber yard on the eastern boundary The gravel operation and lumber yard
makes the existing property less desirable other uses due the adjacent uses heavy industrial nature.
• The self storage use is atypical of other properties in the vicinity with the same zoning Self storage is a low impact use
facilities consisting of 174 607SF will generate an average of 211 trips per day (50% entering /50% exiting) with the
• The majority of trips generated by the expanded facility will occur outside of the business hours of the surrounding
properties The typical customer uses the facility either before work or after work hours with the majority of customers
using the facility over the weekend Allowing the FAR to be exceeded on this site for this self storage use will not
significantly affect the traffic capacity of La Palma Avenue or detrimentally affect the surrounding uses and properties.
CUP NO. 2006m0576
SECTION 4
Contrary to other properties in e vicinity with the same zoning the majority o ne building square footage of self storage
facilities is occupied by uninhabitable space (storage units) The strict interpretation of the Code requires a gross calculation
of building square footage in the FAR calculations However the Code allows for parking structures to be excluded in floor
area calculations as parking structures are considered as being uninhabitable space Of the proposed 174.607SF of building
area of the entire site only 33 971SF of the building is devoted to habitable space i.e. the lobby area corridors stairs and
elevators as well as the office /retail area Therefore that portion of the total building square footage/FAR occupied as
habitable space is substantially less than the habitable space portion of the FAR of the surrounding properties
3. Do the special circumstances applicable to the property deprive it of privileges currently enjoyed by neighboring
properties located within the same zone? X Yes _No
If your answer if "yes," describe the special circumstances:
• Yes The strict interpretation of the Code requires a gross calculation of building square footage in determining the FAR
However the Code does allow for parking structures to be excluded in floor area calculations as these structures are
considered uninhabitable space The self storage use is unique in relation to the adjacent properties as only 33 97ISF of the
152 796SF of buildings is considered habitable space It seems practical that only the habitable space of the project be
counted for the FAR calculation. Therefore applying the same FAR requirements to the property will deprive it of
privileges currently enjoyed by the neighboring properties.
• The storage units are for household goods and are not similar to a warehouse distribution facility. Because this type of
storage is available manv households can use their garage for parking cars rather than for storage This use actually helps
to keep cars parked off of residential streets.
4. Were the special circumstances created by causes beyond the control of the property owner (or previous properly
owners)? X Yes _ No
EXPLAIN: Yes The lack of buildable land in urban areas makes any available land more appropriate for housing,
retail or manufacturing type uses Because self - storage is a neighborhood serving use it is not a use that can relocate
where vacant land is plentiful It makes practical sense to expand the floor area on a site that currently offers the same
use versus expanding site area on to land that even if it was available would make better sense for other types of uses
The sole purpose of any variance or Code waiver shall be to prevent discrimination, and no variance or Code waiver shall be
approved which would have the effect of granting a special privilege not shared by other property in the same vicinity and - zone
which is not otherwise expressly authorized by zone regulations governing subject property. Use variances are not permitted.
Y
Signa�`uit dProperty Owner or Authorized Agent
1/18/06
Date
CONDITIONAL USE PERMITNARIANCE NO.
CUP No. 2006 -05369
Fence Height Waiver Attachment - Item No. 3
PETITIONER'S STATEMENT OF
JUSTIFICATION FOR VARIANCE/CODE WAIVER
(NOT REQUIRED FOR PARKING WAIVER)
REQUEST FOR WAIVER OF CODE SECTION: 18.46.110.030
(A separate statement is required for each Code waiver)
PERTAINING TO _Public Storage - 4880 F. La Palma Ave_
Sections 18.03. 040.030 and 18. 12.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code require that before any variance or Code waiver
may be granted by the Zoning Administrator or Planning Commission, the following shall be shown:
1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or
surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and
2. That, because of such special circumstances, strict application of the zoning code deprives the property of
privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity.
In order to determine if such special circumstances exist, and to assist the Zoning Administrator or
Planning Commission to arrive at a decision, please answer each of the following questions regarding the
property for which a variance is sought, fully and as completely as possible. If you need additional space,
you may attach additional pages.
L Are there special circumstances that apply to the property in matters such as size, shape, topography, location
surroundings'? X Yes _No.
If your answer is "Yes," describe the special circumstances:
storage use on the site there is a need for adequate site security. There is therefore a need for a 6' high
security gate within the setback area as opposed to the allowed 3' high gate.
2. Are the special circumstances that apply to the property different from other properties in the vicinity which are nr the
same zone as your property? X Yes _ No
If your answer is "yes," describe how the properly is different:
• The propertv is currently used and will continue to be used as a self storage building. 'the entire building is
3. Do the special circumstances applicable to the property deprive it of privileges currently enjoyed by neighboring
properties located within the same zone? X Yes No
If your answer if "yes" describe the special circumstances:
• Yes. Although security is of concern to all neighboring property owners site security is especially important for
self storage facilities due to the value of the contents stored wither the buildings. Although all the buildings and
4. Were the special circumstances created by causes beyond the control of the property owner (or previous property
owners)? X Yes _ No
Yes. Section 18.46 110 030 of the Code fie permitting a maximum fence /gate height of 3') is a City standard
which deprives the applicant of providing adequate perimeter security for the site.
The sole purpose of any variance or Code waiver shall be to prevent discrimination, and no variance or Code waiver shall
be approved which would have the effect of granting a special privilege not shared by other property in the same vicinity
and zone which is not otherwise expressly authorized by zone regulations governing subject property. Use variances are not
permitted.
etxEe -of Pre�rer er Authorized Agent
Date
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT /VARIANCE NO.
April 6, 2006
TO: Jessica Nixon, Assistant Planner
FROM: Timor Rafiq, Rafiq & Associates, Inc.
SUBJECT: Second Screencheck Review of 4880 E. La Palma Avenue Mini -
warehouse site in Anaheim
Background: The following information is being presented to compare the trip
generation of a mini- warehouse site developed at 1.1 floor area ratio (FAR) to the trip
generation of an industrial use at 0.5 FAR. The parcel is 3.5 acres.
COMMENT 1
Per the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) 7th edition Trip Generation
Handbook, the mini - warehouse use (using ITE code 151) has trip rates of 0.15 AM
trips /1,000 square feet (SF); 0.26 PM trips /1,000 SF and 2.50 Average Daily Trips
(ADT) /1,000 SF. If the site is developed as a mini - warehouse with a floor area ratio of
1.1, it could contain 167,706 square feet. The trip generation for a 167,706 SF mini -
warehouse is 25 AM, 44 PM and 420 ADT.
COMMENT 2
If the site is developed at 0.5 FAR, it could have a 76,230 SF building. The trip rates for
General Light Industrial (using ITE code 110) are 0.92 AM /1,000 SF; 0.98 PM/I,000 SF;
and 6.97 ADT /1,000 SF. The trip generation for a 76,230 SF light industrial building is
70 AM, 75 PM and 531 ADT.
This information is summarized in the following table:
Building size
Land Use
F.A.R.
AM
PM
ADT
167,706
Mini - warehouse
1.1
25
44
420
76,230
Industrial
0.5
70
75
531
If you have further questions, please contact me at (949) 633 -5440.
a.. 6
Entitlements ® Project Approvals m Real Estate Analysis
January 18, 2006
Planning Department
200 S. Anaheim Blvd
Anaheim, CA 92805
OPERATIONS STATEMENT
Expansion and remodel of an existing self storage facility located at 4880 E. La Palma
Avenue, City of Anaheim, CA
Summary Table
Operation Conditions
Current
Proposed
Hours of Operation
6am — 9 m, 7 days a week
6:00am - 9 m, 7 days a week
Employment
1
1
Number of Shifts
1
1
Square Footage
67,937 SF
174,607SF
Number of Parking Spaces
9
49
Operation Activities
Interior and exterior self-
storage units; sales of tape
and boxes from office area.
Interior and exterior self -
storage units; sales of tape
and boxes from office area.
Exterior Accessible Storage
With exterior accessible units the customer drives up to their unit, rolls up the storage
door of their unit and off -loads their belongings. None of the units have electrical outlets.
The existing single- storage buildings to remain consist of a combination of exterior and
interior accessible units. The existing single story buildings are not climate controlled
Interior Accessible Storage
All 994 of the storage units within the proposed five story building are interior storage
units. With interior storage units the customer enters the storage building through an
access point. Push carts are available for transporting belongings. Customers wheel
their carts to their assigned storage unit. Customers with storage units on floors 2, 3, 4,
23412 Moulton Parkway, Suite 140, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
9491465.8290 1 949/465.8297 -Fax I www.pacificplanninggroup.com
CUP gip. 2006 m 0 5 3 6
5 use the elevators provided to access their floor /storage unit. None of the units have
electrical outlets. All the storage units in the proposed five -story building will be climate
controlled.
Retail Sales Area
A 1,440SF retail /office area is included in the new five story building. For customer
convenience, part of the rental office /lobby area is available for sales of items related to
packing and moving. Typical items for sale would include tape, boxes, packing material,
etc.
Security
Each Public Storage facility includes a state -of -the -art security system_ The customer
enters a personal code into the keypad located at the electronic sliding gate at the
entrance to the buildings with exterior units. When in the lobby of the 5 story
building, the customer enters a personal code into the keypad located next to the
elevator for floors 2 - 5 or the keypad next to the door for access to the first floor
units . Each customer's code is directly linked to their storage space. Each tenant
space is linked to a computer controlled access and alarm system that records and
notifies the onsite management staff of entry and exit to every unit.
In addition, full color 24 -hour close circuit motion detection surveillance and motion
detector lighting is strategically located throughout the site as well as within the 5 story
building. This state of the art security system provides a safe and secure facility for the
customers and reduces the impact on local police services.
Typical Customer
The average tenant stay at a Public Storage facility is about 1.4 years. The typical
customer lives within two to five miles of the facility and visits their unit once every eight
weeks. The average length of an on -site visit is just 15 minutes.
23412 Moulton Parkway, Suite 140, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
949/465.8290 1 949/465.$297.Fax i ww v.pac.ific ;>lanninggroun .com
CUP NO. 2006 - 5 � 5
Entitlements m Project Approvals ® Real Estate Analysis
January 18, 2006
Planning Department
200 S Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
Request to exceed floor area ratio maximum requirement by .54
The existing Public Storage facility is located at 4880 E. La Palma Avenue. The
site is zoned SP 94 -1 (SC) (Northeast Specific Plan Development Area 2 and
Scenic Corridor Overlay). The site area is 152,796SF. The existing self storage
facility consists of 67,937SF of building area and therefore falls within the allowed
FAR of 0.5. The proposed remodel and expansion of the existing self storage
facility will have a total building area of 174,607SF with a building coverage of
67,423SF. The self storage facility will have a FAR of 1.14 which exceeds the
allowed FAR of 0.5 (76,398SF max building area).
Key points to consider
® Increasing the density of the self- storage use on a site currently developed
with the same use, adds supply to the market without displacing other
uses such as retail or manufacturing.
® La Palma Avenue is classified as a major thoroughfare by the City of
Anaheim. Allowing the FAR to be exceeded on this site, for this self
storage use, will not significantly affect the traffic capacity of La Palma
Avenue. The self storage use is atypical of traditional uses allowed within
the Industrial zone. Self storage is a low impact use which does not
generate much traffic. Per Volume 1 of 3 of the 6 th Edition of the Institute
of Transportation Engineers handbook self storage facilities consisting of
174,607SF generate an average of 211 vehicle trips per day (50%
entering /50% exiting) with the minimum number of daily trips being 185.
These additional trips generated by the expanded self storage facility will
not adversely impact the traffic capacity of La Palma Avenue.
® Self storage facilities are at their busiest outside of typical Industrial use
work hours. The majority of trips generated by the expanded facility will
occur outside of the business hours of the surrounding properties. The
typical customer uses the facility either before work or after work hours
with the majority of customers using the facility over the weekend.
Allowing the FAR to be exceeded on this site, for this self storage use, will
23412 Moulton Parkway, Suite 140, Laguna Hills, CA 92653
949/465.8290 1 9491465.8297 -Fax I www.pacificplanninggroup.com
CUP NQ. 20136 0 5 3 6
not significantly affect the traffic capacity of La Palma Avenue or
detrimentally affect the surrounding uses.
• The strict interpretation of the Code requires a gross calculation of building
square footage in the FAR calculations. However the Code allows for
parking structures to be excluded in floor area calculations as parking
structures are considered as being uninhabitable space. The majority of
the building square footage of self storage facilities is occupied by
uninhabitable space (storage units). Of the 174,607SF of building area of
the expanded facility only 33,971SF of the buildings are classified as
habitable space i.e. the lobby area, corridors, stairs and elevators as well
as the office /retail area. Therefore that portion of the total building square
footage /FAR occupied as habitable space is substantially less than the
habitable space portion of the FAR of the surrounding uses.
• The additional storage units proposed are for the storage of household
goods and are not similar to a warehouse distribution facility. Because
this type of storage is available, many households can use their garage for
parking their cars rather than using their garage for storage. This use
actually helps to keep cars parked off of residential streets thereby
improving the streetscape of surrounding neighborhoods.
• The waiver will not be detrimental to the public health, safety, or welfare.
It will also not be materially injurious to properties or other improvements
in the vicinity. In fact, it is expected that the upgrades of the facility will be
seen as a benefit to the larger area in which most has been designated as
blighted hence the establishment of the nearby redevelopment project
area. Updated architecture, new landscaping and improved security will
add value to the existing property and cause the surrounding self- storage
properties to improve to remain competitive.
• The existing self- storage site is uniquely situated. The site is bordered by
the Santa Ana river channel in the rear, a gravel operation on the western
boundary and a lumber yard to the east. The gravel operation and lumber
yard makes the existing site less desirable for office or residential type
uses due the adjacent uses heavy industrial nature and high impacts.
23412 Moulton Parkway, Suite 140, Lacuna Hills, CA 92653
949/465.8290 i 949/465.8297- Fax wwtiv.pacfficolannin99mup.c0m
CUP NO. 2CC6 m 0 5
Item No. 4
ANAHEIM RESORT
RCL 66 -67 -61 (10£
RCL 66 -67 -14
RCL 55 -56 -24
CUP 2004 -04848
INDUSTRIAL
BUILDING
ory v�r� �
Je ryryo oop �� °c el
G � O, A . ,- -, 6
SP 92 -1
RCL 66-67-61 (27)
RCL 64-65 -112
CUP 755
CUP 574
CUP 32
VAR 2074 S
DISNEYLAND
PARKING
LANDSCAPED SP 92 -1
EASEMENT RCL 66£7£1(108)
SP 92 -1
RCL 66 -67 -61 76)
T -CUP 2004 -0 941
CUP 4078
(RCL 56- 57 -92)
VACANT
Variance No. 2006 -04681
Requested By: STEVE SHELDON
200 West Arlo Way
Q.S. No. 87
10016
w
ti
S SP 92 -2
RCL66 -67 -61 (10,4
/ VACANT ,
1115 R - 4- 100
7 ,
cuss -s L E KERY
P2 P206 s> SP 92 -1
0
RCL 77 -78 -58
8 co
RCL 66-67-61 (108)
N CUP2964
2 1 VAR 2006 -04681
ss-67s1 (108) VAR 3009
J DIST VAR 730
CENTER CHILDRENS STORE
SP 92 -1
RCL 77 -78-58
RCL 66-67-61 (108)
CUP 2330
VAR 3009
VAR 730
SM. IND. FIRM
SP 92 -1
RCL66 -67 -61 (108)
CUP 1809
DIgNFY W
CERRITOS AVE.
CUP 2002 -04611
CUP 2002 -04610
�,........,.yZ
RCL2000 -00023
SABC Overlay Zone)
Cl
II
RCL 78 -79-02
\
SABC Overla Zone
Y )CUP 1589
RCL 57 -58-16
RCL 78 -79-02
VAR 3166 S
CUP 3738
CUP 200504981
VAR 3025 S
CUP 3350
CUP 3738
CUP 3089
CUP 2374
CUP 2328
CUP 1849
9
CUP 1589
g9
VAR 3166 S
y
,�0
VAR 3025 S
o��ry
ANAHEIM
BUSINESS PARK
CERRITOS AVE.
CUP 2002 -04611
CUP 2002 -04610
CUP 3350
RCL2000 -00023
CUP2374
Cl
(Res of Int to
CUP 2328
CUP 1849
\
SABC Overla Zone
Y )CUP 1589
RCL 78 -79-02
VAR 3166 S
,_ RCL 57 -58 -16
VAR 3025 S
CUP 3738
( 9 F
�
s p
C p G T
��� ���
161A
O G,
�O
AY ,
N
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 4
4a. CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION -CLASS 11 (READVERTISED) (Motion for continuance)
4b. VARIANCE NO. 2006 -04681
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This irregularly- shaped 1.5 -acre property has a frontage of 100 feet on the south side of Alro
Way, a maximum depth of 246 feet, and is located 115 feet east of the centerline of
Manchester Avenue (200 West Alro Way — Bergstroms).
REQUEST:
(2) Applicant requests waiver of the following to retain one non - conforming business identification
pole sign with electronic message board and one non - conforming business identification wall
sign:
(a) SECTION NO. 18.114.130.0207.01
Maximum letter height
( inches (for registered trademark
name) permitted, 3 foot 2 inch to 4 foot 8
inch letters existing)
(b) SECTION NO.18.114.130.020.0207.01
BACKGROUND:
Continuation and Termination of Legal
Non - Conforming Signs
(Pole sign and readerboard sign
prohibited as of December 31, 2005; one
pole sign with electronic message board
to remain until December 31, 2019)
(3) This property is zoned SP92 -1 (The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan). The property and all
surrounding properties are designated for Commercial Recreation land uses by the Anaheim
General Plan.
(4) This item was continued from the April 3, 2006 Commission in order for staff to readvertise the
waiver relating to the pole sign. The applicant has submitted the attached letter requesting a
continuance to the May 15, 2006 meeting due to scheduling conflicts.
RECOMMENDATION:
(5) That the Commission, by motion, continue this item to the May 15, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting.
S R- VAR2006- 04685/1 /2006.
Page 1
rGROUP Public Affairs Land Use Law
a
April 17, 2006
Ms. Della Herrick
Associate Planner
City of Anaheim
200 Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
Ms. Herrick:
Attachment - Item No. 4
RE: VAR2006 -04681 Bergstroms Sign Waiver
On behalf of Bergstroms Childrens Stores, we respectfully request a continuance of our May 1
planning commission hearing to May 15.
Unfortunately, due to some scheduling conflicts beyond our control, several of our team
members will be unavailable to attend the hearing on May 1.
We appreciate your consideration of this request and thank you for your patience. If you have
any questions, please contact me at (949) 777 -9400.
Since ely,
Stephen R. Sheldon
Cc: Karl Bergstrom, President, Bergstroms Children Stores
901 Dove Street, Suite 140, Newport Beach, CA 92660 then, 949 - 777 -9400 • fax 949- 777 -9410 • web www.sheldongrp.com
Riverside 951 - 300 -2220 San Dieeo 619 - 233 -7135
Item No. 5
r RS -2 i
DU ACH
RS -2 _
1 DU EAC
STANLEY AVE
YALE AVENUE
R 4
RCL 65 -66 -117
VAR 1796
APARTMENTS
70 DU
N -4
i$6 -117
6 -57 -41
1796
DU
F7
RM-4
RCL 65 -66 -117
RCL 56 -57A1
VAR 1796
68 DU
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05077
H
W
W
H
Q
Z_
W
Q
J
4- 265' IN 1-0 -139' I
PARCEL 1
RCL 63 -64 -55
RCL 56 -57 -41
T -CUP 2005 -04961
-
RS -2
- —
RS -2
1 DU EAC
-
-
1 DU EACH
x
CUP 2003 -04816
Red evelopment Project
CUP 2001 -04411
CUP 2001 -04396
APARTMENTS
RS-2
VAR 3186
rn
1 DU EACH
112 DU
�x
RM-4 RM-4
Z
RCL67�8 -79 RCL 67 -68-79
R
RCL
CL
1 DU
BRUCE AVE
UI
K
R\
N
RS-2
1 DU EACH
RS -2
1 DU EACH
PARCEL 1
RCL 63 -64 -55
RCL 56 -57 -41
T -CUP 2005 -04961
-
- —
RS -2
1 DU EAC
-
-
West Anaheim Commercial Corridors
CUP 2003 -04816
Red evelopment Project
CUP 2001 -04411
CUP 2001 -04396
APARTMENTS
VAR 3186
NURSERY
112 DU
RM-4 RM-4
Z
RCL67�8 -79 RCL 67 -68-79
RCL 7 RCL 56 -573
VAR R 19 1973 3 VAR 1973
RCL
CL
LU
UI
K
R\
N
�I
Requested By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
2711 West Yale Avenue - SCE Easement
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Q.S. No. 19
10027
RUSSELLAVE
Date of Aerial Photo:
July 2005
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05077
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Requested By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON
2711 West Yale Avenue - SCE Easement
Q.S. No. 19
10027
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 5
5a CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Motion)
5b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05077 (Resolution)
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly- shaped 3.5 -acre property has a frontage of 265 feet on the north side of
Yale Avenue, a maximum depth of 583 feet, and is located 139 feet west of La Reina Street
(2711 West Yale Avenue- SCE Easement).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit under authority of Code
Section 18.14.030.040.0402 and 18.38.060 to permit a telecommunications facility on an
existing SCE lattice tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment-
BACKGROUND
( This property is currently developed with Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission
towers and a plant nursery and is zoned T (Transition Zone). The Anaheim General Plan
designates this property for Open Space land uses and surrounding properties to the east
for Low Density Residential land uses; to the west for Low - Density Residential land uses
and Low Medium Density Residential land uses; and to the north and south for Open
Space land uses.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL:
(4) The applicant proposes to construct a telecommunications facility consisting of six (6)
sectors with one (1) panel antenna per sector on an existing 123 -foot high Edison
transmission tower. This request also includes ground- mounted accessory equipment
located directly beneath the tower within a 289 square foot lease area.
(5) The site plan (Exhibit Nos. 1 -A and 1 -13) indicates the 123 -foot high tower is located near
the northern portion of the property, approximately 198 feet north of Yale Avenue. There
are currently no other telecommunications antennas located on the tower. Properties 173
feet to the east and 84 feet to the west are developed with single -story single - family homes.
SRCUP2006- 05077dh
Page 1
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No- 5
Aerial view of the subject site
(6) The elevation plans and photo simulations (Exhibit Nos- 2 and 3) indicate that antennas
would be placed at an operating center height of 47 feet above ground level and mounted
parallel to the lattice tower- Ground - mounted equipment would be located directly below
the tower -
View from Yale Avenue
_c+ 01 W
Proposed
Proposed equipment
antennas
1 1 �, ,
Page 2
a.
}
Op
tz
(6) The elevation plans and photo simulations (Exhibit Nos- 2 and 3) indicate that antennas
would be placed at an operating center height of 47 feet above ground level and mounted
parallel to the lattice tower- Ground - mounted equipment would be located directly below
the tower -
View from Yale Avenue
_c+ 01 W
Proposed
Proposed equipment
antennas
1 1 �, ,
Page 2
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 5
(7) The site plan does not propose any additional landscaping. A 5 foot wide landscaped
setback is currently provided by the nursery.
(8) The antenna layout plan (Exhibit No. 4) indicates the panel antennas are five (5) feet in
height by one (1) foot in width and four (4) inches in depth. The antennas would be painted
to match the existing tower. In addition, a 24 -inch high microwave dish and a 24 -inch GPS
antenna would also be mounted on the tower and painted to match the existing tower. The
proposed antennas and brackets would not be flush - mounted. Southern California Edison
standards do not allow for antennas to be flush- mounted. According to SCE, in order to
service the lattice tower, staff must climb the tower; flush- mounted antennas create a
potential hazard because staff would need to climb in front of the brackets and antennas.
(9) The elevation plan (Exhibit No. 2) indicates a 232 square foot proposed equipment area
located between the existing lattice tower legs. The equipment area would have an 8 -foot
high chain link fence completely surrounding the equipment. The applicant has agreed to
replace the chain link fence with decorative wrought iron as required by Code. The fencing
would secure the equipment and provide screening for the ground mounted equipment.
(10) The applicant's supplemental information statement indicates that Royal Street
Communications /Metro PCS is a new wireless carrier to the Southern California region.
This proposal's primary objective is to cover the vicinity of Crescent Street (north), Lincoln
Avenue (south), Dale Avenue (east), and Magnolia Street (west). There are surrounding
sites that are planned that will integrate with this particular site, as the network develops.
As sites begin to go "on air ", this site will cover a much wider area than the aforementioned
street boundaries. Coverage and capacity are a function of distance and network customer
usage.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(11) Staff has reviewed the proposal for a telecommunication facility and the Initial Study (a
copy of which is available for review in the Planning Department) and finds no significant
environmental impact and, therefore, recommends that a Negative Declaration be
approved upon a finding by the Planning Commission that the Negative Declaration reflects
the independent judgment of the lead agency; and that it has considered the proposed
Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process and further finding on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment-
EVALUATION
(12) Communication facilities and antennas are permitted in the T Zone subject to the approval
of a conditional use permit and the requirements of Section 18.38.060 pertaining to
telecommunication antennas of Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Uses).
(13) On, June 7, 2005, the City Council approved a franchise agreement with SCE. Within that
agreement, provisions were made to upgrade fencing and landscaping on properties
owned by SCE in an effort to improve the aesthetics of the property to the public right -of-
way. The agreement states that SCE would require that at the time a license or lease is
Page 3
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 5
renewed, terminated or created, a 10 -foot wide area would be devoted to landscaping.
Although this new lease for the telecommunications facility does not include the area
immediately adjacent to the street, staff feels in keeping with the direction of the franchise
agreement, 10 feet of landscaping should be provided along Yale Avenue. Staff is
recommending as a condition of approval that trees /shrubs in containers from the existing
nursery be provided in front of the facility to screen the site from public view. The existing
land use, a plant nursery, has a large quantity of trees and shrubs and the applicant has
agreed to work with the nursery to place landscaping stock in front of the
telecommunications facility to help screen the facility from public view.
(14) The recently updated Zoning Code includes design guidelines and requirements for
telecommunication facilities. Code requires wireless communication facilities be co- located
where technologically feasible and visually beneficial. Staff feels "stealth" installations and
installation on existing SCE lattice towers are the best alternative to decrease visual clutter
and preserve the aesthetic quality of the community. Since the proposed location for the
antennas and accessory ground mounted equipment is located 198 feet from the closest
public right -of -way, the visual impact of the additional antennas on the existing tower would
be minimal. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request-
FINDINGS
(15) Before the Planning Commission grants any conditional use permit, it must make a finding
of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
(a) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this code, or is an unlisted use as defined in Subsection .030
(Unlisted Uses Permitted) of Section 18.66.040 (Approval Authority);
(b) That the use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
(c) That the size and shape of the site proposed for use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
nor or to health and safety;
(d) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area; and
(e) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim-
RECOMMENDATION
(16) Staff recommends that unless additional or contrary information is received during the
meeting, and based upon the evidence submitted to the Commission, including the
evidence presented in this staff report, and oral and written evidence presented at the
public hearing, that the Planning Commission take the following actions:
(a) By motion, approve a Negative Declaration for the project.
Page 4
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 5
(b) By resolution, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05077 to permit a
telecommunications facility on an existing SCE lattice tower with accessory
ground- mounted equipment, by adopting the attached resolution including the
findings and conditions contained herein.
Page 5
[DRAFT]
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006 - * **
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05077 BE GRANTED
(2711 WEST YALE AVENUE — SCE EASEMENT)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
THE EASTERLY 265 FEET OF THE EAST HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE
SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 12, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 11 WEST, IN THE
RANCHO LOS COYOTES, AS SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER IS SHOWN ON A MAP OF TRACT
NO. 2303 RECORDED IN BOOK 89 PAGES 35, 36 AND 37 OF MISCELLANEIOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of
Anaheim on May 1, 2006, at 230 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law
and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider
evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts
1 - That the applicant proposal to permit a telecommunications facility on an existing electrical
transmission tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section Nos. 18.14.030.040.0402 and 18.38.060.
2. That the proposed telecommunications facility would not adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the proposal
locates the proposed antennas on an existing electrical transmission tower 198 feet from the public right -of -way
and over 85 feet the nearest adjacent single - family homes.
3. That the size and shape of the site is adequate to allow full development of the proposal in a
manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health and safety because the telecommunications
facility would be to located on an existing electrical lattice tower with minimal new equipment.
4. That because this is an unmanned facility with infrequent maintenance, the traffic generated by
the proposed use will not, under the conditions imposed, impose an undue burden upon the streets and
highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
5. That granting this conditional use permit will not, under the conditions imposed, be detrimental
to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and that the use will contribute to an essential and
effective wireless communications network system in a manner that will blend in with the existing facilities.
6. That * ** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit a telecommunications facility on an existing electrical
transmission tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it
has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process
and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial
evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
Cr1PC2006- -1- PC2006
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a
necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health and safety of
the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That this telecommunications facility shall be limited to no more than six (6) sectors with one (1) panel
antenna on each sector on the existing electrical lattice tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment
and one GPS antenna and one microwave dish. The six (6) sectors shall be limited to a height of fifty (50)
feet in height. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. No
additional antennas or equipment cabinets shall be permitted without the prior approval of the Planning
Commission at a noticed public hearing.
2. That the antennas shall be finished and painted to match the existing electrical transmission tower. If the
finish or color of the tower is modified, the antennas shall be modified accordingly. Said information shall
be specifically shown on the plans submitted by building permits.
3. That that ground- mounted equipment shall be located entirely within an 8 -foot high decorative wrought iron
fence and the cable connecting to the equipment shall be underground and shall not be visible to the
public. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
4. That all equipment, including supply cabinets and power meter shall be screened from the public right -of-
way. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
5. That the Operator shall ensure that its installation and choice of frequencies will not interfere with in the
800 MHz radio frequencies required by the City of Anaheim to provide adequate spectrum capacity for
public safety and related purposes.
6. That before activating this facility, the Operator shall submit to a post - installation test to confirm that the
facility does not interfere with the City of Anaheim's Public Safety radio equipment. This test shall be
conducted by the Communications Division of the Orange County Sheriffs Department or a Division
approved contractor at the expense of Operator.
7. That the Operator shall provide a 24 -hour telephone number, fax number and e-mail address to the
Planning Services Division (to be forwarded to the Fire and Police Departments) to which interference
problems may be reported, and shall resolve all interference complaints within 24 hours.
8. That the Operator shall ensure that any of its contractors, sub - contractors or agents, or any other user of
the facility, shall comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
9. That should this telecommunication facility be sold, the Planning Services Divisions shall be notified within
30 days of the close of escrow.
10. That any required relocation of City electrical facilities shall be at the petitioner's expense. Landscape
and /or landscape screening of all pad mounted equipment shall be required and shall be specifically shown
on plans submitted for building permits.
11. That the applicant shall obtain a Right -of -Way Construction Permit from the Public Works Department for
any work within the public right -of -way, including but not limited to installation of conduit, cable, and
electrical service lines.
12. That the routing of the telco and power runs shall be routed within the property parallel to the existing
property line and then out to the power pole. Pullboxes shall be required where the conduits change
direction. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
13. That the portion of the property being leased to the telecommunication provider shall be permanently
maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of
trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty -four (24) hours from time of occurrence-
-2- PC2006-
14. That no signs, flags, banners, or any other form of advertising shall be attached to the antennas or to the
transmission tower structure.
15. That a final landscape and equipment enclosure plan shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division
for review and approval indicating an 8 -foot high decorative wrought iron fence with landscaping from the
nursery placed in front of the enclosure to screen the equipment from the public view along Yale Avenue.
Any decision by staff regarding said plans may be appealed to the Planning Commission as a Reports and
Recommendations item. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building
permits.
16. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department
marked Exhibit Nos-1 through 7 and as conditioned herein.
17. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolution,
whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 12 and 15 above mentioned, shall be complied with.
Extensions of further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section
18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
18. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 6, 7 and 16, above mentioned shall be
complied with.
19. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State, and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request
regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or equipment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all
of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or
unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to
the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to
the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in
delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 1, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Zoning Provisions
— General" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City
Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
SENIOR SECRETARY. ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC2006-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission held on
May 1, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
VACANT: COMMISSIONERS:
2006.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC2006-
Item No. 6
o ❑ ❑ �ow� ❑
� I– z —
K K LL F ryo c y
LL
Z O ❑ d wow zz
0
Q Q Q UU 11 W 0_
m t >
STONYBROOK DRIVE
RS -2 VAR 3072
1 DU EACH
West Anaheim Commercial Comdom
Redevelopment PmjeC
T
CHALLENGER
EDUCATIONAL CLINIC
POLARIS HIGH SCHOOL
T
DALE JUNIOR
HIGH SCHOOL
RM4
Q
n z
Qo
o oUQI
�KZU
T
87 -88-12
m
r o
1 DU
.L Bfi -87 -20
a
VAR 3162
VAR 3697
o r
0ll
VAR 3627
y [ ° o V
eUP 541
INSET PLAZA
boo¢
x ooU
=
'ARTMENTS
O
x
106DU
wQ
�
wx
w
O
ry
>� OrvF
STONYBROOK DRIVE
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RS -2 RS -2
EDISON EASEMENT
NURSERY 1 DU ° 1 DU EACH
a
U EACH
1 DU EACH
ROMEAVE
�. �...J
265'
BALL ROAD
1 RM -4 U RM -4 RM-4
5 RCCUP458t6 Z RC 2 DU 4 RC CUP 426 T T
D 52 Du 53 DU VAR 822 S NURSERY
m
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05080
Q
n z
Qo
o oUQI
�KZU
J
RCL70 -71- 4
ReL 8687 -15
L
VAR 3162
RCL 63-64 -91
ReL 63- 4 '
0ll
VAR 2229
VAR 2248
eUP 541
OU?WQ
APARTMENTS
=
VAR3616
O
x
x
U
wQ
VJ W
wx
O
wQ
�
wx
w
O
ry
�
�W
WJ
O
�. �...J
265'
BALL ROAD
1 RM -4 U RM -4 RM-4
5 RCCUP458t6 Z RC 2 DU 4 RC CUP 426 T T
D 52 Du 53 DU VAR 822 S NURSERY
m
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05080
V)
Q
Z
Q Q
�w �w
w w w w
o 0
1 46 , West Anaheim Commecial COrritlom
Redevelopment Project
RM-4
U)
Z
U)
RCL70 -71- 4
ReL 8687 -15
L
VAR 3162
RCL 63-64 -91
ReL 63- 4 '
C-1
VAR 2229
VAR 2248
eUP 541
AF
APARTMENTS
wQ
rj1W
W
VAR3616
wQ
rj1W
WW
O
x
U
wQ
VJ W
wx
O
wQ
�
wx
w
O
O
ADJ 87 -2
CUP 2093
V)
Q
Z
Q Q
�w �w
w w w w
o 0
1 46 , West Anaheim Commecial COrritlom
Redevelopment Project
RM-4
RCL 70 -71 -29
RCL70 -71- 4
ReL 8687 -15
L
VAR 3162
RCL 63-64 -91
ReL 63- 4 '
C-1
VAR 2229
VAR 2248
eUP 541
AF
APARTMENTS
CU 541
VAR3616
06 DU
W DU
IV
Requested By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, LTD
2719 West Ball Road
10029
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: Graphic
Q.S. No. 21
Date of Aerial Photo:
July 2005
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05080
Requested By: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY, LTD
2719 West Ball Road
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: Graphic
Q.S. No. 21
10029
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 6
6a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Motion)
6b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05080 (Resolution)
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly- shaped, 7.77 -acre property has a frontage of 265 feet on the north side
of Ball Road, a depth of 1,267 feet, and is located 146 feet west of the centerline of Sherrill
Street (2719 West Ball Road).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit under authority of Code
Section 18.14.030.040.0402 and 18.38.060 to permit a telecommunications antenna on an
existing SCE electrical transmission tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment-
BACKGROUND
( This property is currently developed with Southern California Edison (SCE) transmission
towers and a plant nursery and is zoned T (Transition Zone). The Anaheim General Plan
designates this property and properties to the north and south for open space land uses.
Properties to east are designated for Low Density Residential land uses and properties to
the west for School land uses.
(4) Conditional Use Permit No. 2001 -04416 (to permit a telecommunications antenna and
accessory ground- mounted equipment) was approved by the Planning Commission on
December 11, 2001). This proposal pertained to a SCE transmission tower adjacent to Ball
Road.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL:
(5) The applicant proposes to construct a telecommunications facility consisting of three (3)
sectors with two (2) panel antennas on each sector, on an existing 119 -foot high SCE
transmission tower. This request also includes a ground- mounted accessory equipment
shelter located directly beneath the tower within a 400 square foot lease area.
(6) The site plan (Exhibit No. 1) indicates the 119 -foot high tower is located near the northern
portion of the property, approximately 280 feet from Stonybrook Drive and approximately
1,095 feet from Ball Road. There are currently four (4) transmission towers on the
property. There are currently no other telecommunications antennas located on the tower,
but there is another telecommunications facility on the transmission tower adjacent to Ball
Road.
Srcup2006- 05080klw. doc
Page 1
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 6
Aerial of subject site.
(7) The elevation plans and photo simulations (Exhibit Nos. 2 and 3) indicate that antennas
would be placed at an operating center 60 feet above ground level and ground- mounted
equipment would be located directly below the lattice tower.
Page 2
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 6
Elevation of proposed antennas
Page 3
a
n wv2xx
B
� �
a I
� �
Elevation of proposed antennas
Page 3
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 6
(8) The site plan does not propose any additional landscaping. A 5 foot wide existing
landscape setback is provided along Stonybrook Drive.
(9) The antenna layout plan (Exhibit No. 4) indicates the panel antennas are five (5) feet in
height by one (1) foot in width and four (4) inches in depth. The antennas would be painted
to match the existing tower. Also proposed are a 24 -inch diameter microwave dish and a
6 -inch tall 3 -inch wide GPS antenna affixed to one of the proposed sectors 50 feet above
ground level. These would also be painted to match the existing tower. The proposed
antennas and brackets would not be flush- mounted. Southern California Edison standards
do not allow for antennas to be flush - mounted. According to SCE, in order to service the
lattice tower, staff must climb the flush - mounted antennas, creating a potential hazard
because staff would need to climb in front of the brackets and antennas.
(10) The lease area plan (Exhibit No. 4) proposes a 155 square foot equipment area located
between the existing transmission tower legs. The plans indicate the equipment area
would be surrounded by a chain link fence. The applicant has agreed to replace the chain
link fence with decorative wrought iron as required by Code. The fencing would provide
screening of the ground- mounted equipment and security. The existing land use, a plant
nursery, has a large quantity of trees and shrubs that would be placed around the legs of
the tower to help screen the equipment from public view along Stonybrook Drive.
(11) The applicant's supplemental information statement indicates that Royal Street
Communications /Metro PCS is a new wireless carrier to the Southern California region.
This proposal's primary objective is to cover the vicinity of Ball Road (south), Stonybrook
Drive (north), Magnolia Avenue (east), and Dale Avenue (west). There are surrounding
sites that are planned that will integrate with this particular site, as the network develops.
As sites begin to "on air', this site will cover a much wider area than the aforementioned
street boundaries. Coverage and capacity are a function of distance and network customer
usage.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(12) Staff has reviewed the proposal for a telecommunications facility and the Initial Study (a
copy of which is available for review in the Planning Department) and finds no significant
environmental impact and, therefore, recommends that a Negative Declaration be
approved upon a finding by the Planning Commission that the Negative Declaration reflects
the independent judgment of the lead agency; and that it has considered the proposed
Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process and further finding on the basis of the Initial Study and any comments received that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment-
EVALUATION
(13) Telecommunications facilities and antennas are permitted in the T Zone subject to the
approval of a conditional use permit and the requirements of Section 18.38.060 pertaining
to telecommunications antennas of Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Uses).
Page 4
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 6
(14) On June 7, 2005, the City Council approved a franchise agreement with SCE. Within that
agreement, provisions were made to upgrade fencing and landscaping on properties
owned by SCE in an effort to improve the aesthetics of the property to the public right -of-
way. The agreement states that SCE would require that at the time a license or lease is
renewed, terminated, or created, a 10 -foot wide area would be devoted to landscaping.
Although this new lease for the telecommunications facility does not include the area
immediately adjacent to the street, staff feels in keeping with the direction of the franchise
agreement, 10 feet of landscaping should be provided along Stonybrook Drive. Staff is
recommending a condition of approval that trees /shrubs in containers from the existing
nursery be provided in front of the facility to screen the site from public view. The existing
land use, a plant nursery, has a large quantity of trees and shrubs and the applicant has
agreed to work with the nursery to place landscaping stock in front of the
telecommunications facility to help screen the facility from public view.
(15) The recently updated Zoning Code includes design guidelines and requirements for
telecommunication facilities. Code requires wireless communication facilities to be co-
located where technologically feasible and visually beneficial. Staff feels "stealth"
installations and installation on existing SCE lattice towers are the best alternative to
decrease visual clutter and preserve the aesthetic quality of the community. The new
facility would be located approximately 280 feet away from Stonybrook Drive and 1,095 feet
way from Ball Road, further minimizing the visibility of the proposed antennas and
equipment location from public view. Staff feels the location on the existing SCE
transmission tower is the best alternative to decrease visual clutter and preserve the
aesthetic quality of the community and therefore, staff recommends approval of this
request-
FINDINGS
(16) Before the Planning Commission grants any conditional use permit, it must make a finding
of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
(a) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this code, or is an unlisted use as defined in Subsection .030
(Unlisted Uses Permitted) of Section 18.66.040 (Approval Authority);
(b) That the use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
(c) That the size and shape of the site proposed for use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
nor or to health and safety;
(d) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area; and
(e) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
Page 5
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 6
RECOMMENDATION:
(17) Staff recommends that, unless additional or contrary information is received during the
meeting, and based upon the evidence submitted to the Commission, including the
evidence presented in this staff report, and oral and written evidence presented at the
public hearing, the Planning Commission take the following actions:
(a) By motion, approve a Negative Declaration for the project.
(b) By resolution, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05080 to permit a
telecommunications facility on an existing SCE electric transmission tower with
accessory ground- mounted equipment, by adopting the attached resolution
including the findings and conditions contained herein.
Page 6
[DRAFT]
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006 * **
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05080 BE GRANTED
(2719 WEST BALL ROAD)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
THE SOUTHERLY 175.00 FEET OF LOT 3 IN BLOCK 13 OF THE SUBDIVISION OF
THE SOUTH ONE -HALF OF SECTION 21, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST,
S.B.B. AND M., AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 1, PAGE 33 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on May 1, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to
hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and on its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. That the applicant proposal to permit a telecommunications facility on an existing
transmission tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment is properly one for which a conditional use
permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section Nos. 18.14.030.040.0402 and 18.38.060.
2. That the proposed telecommunications facility would not adversely affect the adjoining land
uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the proposal
locates the proposed antennas on an existing electrical transmission tower reducing the cumulative visual
clutter of such facilities by using existing infrastructure, and the transmission tower is located 280 feet from
Stonybrook Drive further minimizing the visual impact of the proposed facility.
3. That the size and shape of the site is adequate to allow full development of the proposal in a
manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health and safety because the telecommunications
facility would be located on an existing electrical transmission tower with minimal new equipment.
4. That because this is an unmanned facility with infrequent maintenance, the traffic generated
by the proposed use will not, under the conditions imposed, impose an undue burden upon the streets and
highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area.
5. That granting this conditional use permit will not, under the conditions imposed, be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and that the use will contribute to
an effective wireless communications network system in a manner that would blend in with the existing
facilities.
6. That * ** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit a telecommunications facility on an existing electrical
Cr\PC2006 -0 -1- PC2006-
transmission tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment; and does hereby approve the Negative
Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it
has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no
substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does
hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
health and safety of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That this telecommunications facility shall be limited to no more three (3) sectors with no more than two
(2) panel antennas on each sector, a 24 -inch diameter microwave dish, and a 6 -inch tall 3 -inch wide
GPS antenna, on the existing electrical lattice tower with accessory ground- mounted equipment. The
six (6) antennas shall be limited to a height of 63 feet. No additional antennas or equipment cabinets
shall be permitted without the approval of the Planning Commission at a noticed public hearing.
2. That the antennas shall be finished and painted to match the existing electrical lattice tower structure. If
the finish or color of the tower is modified, the antennas shall be modified accordingly. Said information
shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted by building permits.
3. That that ground- mounted equipment shall be located entirely within an 8 -foot high decorative wrought
iron fence and the cable connecting to the equipment shall be underground and shall not be visible to
the public. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
4. That all equipment, including supply cabinets and power meter shall be screened from the public right -
of -way. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
5. That the Operator shall ensure that its installation and choice of frequencies will not interfere with in the
800 MHz radio frequencies required by the City of Anaheim to provide adequate spectrum capacity for
public safety and related purposes.
6. That before activating this facility, the Operator shall submit to a post - installation test to confirm that the
facility does not interfere with the City of Anaheim's Public Safety radio equipment. This test shall be
conducted by the Communications Division of the Orange County Sheriffs Department or a Division
approved contractor at the expense of Operator.
7. That the Operator shall provide a 24 -hour telephone number to the Planning Services Division (to be
forwarded to the Fire and Police Departments) to which interference problems may be reported, and
shall resolve all interference complaints within 24 hours.
8. That the Operator shall ensure that any of its contractors, sub - contractors or agents, or any other user
of the facility, shall comply with the terms and conditions of this permit.
9. That should this telecommunication facility be sold, the Planning Services Divisions shall be notified
within 30 days of the close of escrow.
10. That any required relocation of City electrical facilities shall be at the petitioner's expense. Landscape
and/or landscape screening of all pad mounted equipment shall be required and shall be specifically
shown on plans submitted for building permits.
11. That the applicant shall obtain a Right -of -Way Construction Permit from the Public Works Department
for any work within the public right -of -way, including but not limited to installation of conduit, cable, and
electrical service lines-
-2- PC2006-
12. That the routing of the telco and power runs shall be routed within the property parallel to the existing
property line and then out to the power pole. Pull -boxes shall be required where the conduits change
direction. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
13. That portion of the property being leased to the telecommunication provider shall be permanently
maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of
trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty -four (24) hours from time of occurrence.
14. That no signs, flags, banners, or any other form of advertising shall be attached to the antennas or to
the transmission tower structure.
15. That a final landscape and equipment enclosure plan indicting a 8 -foot high decorative wrought iron
fence with landscaping from the nursery placed in front of the enclosure to screen the equipment from
the public view along Stonybrook Drive. Any decision by staff regarding said plans may be appealed to
the Planning Commission as a Reports and Recommendations item. Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
16. That the subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with the plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the
Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos-1 through 7 and as conditioned herein.
17. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this
resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 10, 12 and 15 above mentioned, shall be
complied with. Extensions of further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance
with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
18. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition Nos. 6, 7, and 16, above mentioned shall
be complied with.
19. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State, and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation, or equipment.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and
all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared
invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related
to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or
prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges
shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 1, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Zoning
Provisions — General" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
ATTEST:
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC2006-
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission
held on May 1, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
VACANT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
, 2006.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC2006-
Item No. 7
NR Gbtlb \ �\ Kl:Lbb -0/Jb
VAR 3989 RCL 66 -67 -14
RCL 55-5 13
6-
RCL 55 -5 -19
RCL 5455-42
KATELWLEWIS
9
'_RCL
es. of Int. to SE) RCL 66 -6744
RCL 66 -67 -14 RCL 56 -57 -93
RCL 55 -56 -21 CUP 2264
CUP 3345 FRITZ
STONE CENTER S PORT S
BAR
I
RCL
56 -57 -93
CUP 3615
IND. FIRM
� I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 56 -57 -93
CUP 2006 -05079
CUP 585
VAR 2441
(RCL 70- 71 -34)
IND. FIRM
CUP 585
- -*— 209'
� t I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res of Int. to S
RCL 56 -57 -93
CUP 585
9
9,
N �"9
G
�dl
XIN
SP 92 -2
CL 86 -87 -28 ` L
CIL
CUP 1464
SP 92-
VAR 1276 VAR 1717
Ix VAR 904
ROO SPEED SHOP
T (MHP)
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05079
Requested By: IDELFONSO G. MARQUEZ, JR. AND
CHERYLY.MARQUEZ
1835 South Lewis Street
10028
Anaheim Blvd Area) ~
I
I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 66 -67 -14
CUP 434
I
ALARM ONE
RCL 99 -00 -15
Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 99 -00.15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
CUP 679
F- I
W
UJ RCL 99 -00 -15 -
� (Res. of Int. to SE)
r (n
(n I
IND. FIRMS
�W
RCL 99 -00.15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 66 -67 -14
RCL 65 -66 -84
CUP 1670
I
RCL 99 -(
O -H (Res. of Int.
IND. FIR RCL 66 -f
CUP if
IND. FIF
I
RCL 99 -00 -15
es. oflnt.to S
CUP 1670
N�
RCL 99 -00.15 Q') � I
(Res. of Int. to SE) ¢ I RCL 99 -00.15
T -CUP 2001 -04436 j (Res. of Int. to SE)
CUP 3583 m I L 56 -57 -9
CUP 3148
CUP 1591
TRANSPORT
INT'L POOL
c CUP 24!
N CUP 20!
N
0
U
RCL 99 -00 -15 ��" CUP 196 Q CUP 28
(Res. of Int. to SE) ,N Z
CUP 2005 -05039 Q
T -CUP 2001 -04436 U)
CUP 3148 a 1
CUP 1591
Z AIRPORT COACH 12 CUP 2037
C M
U
1) CUP 2058 -
O 1
GENE AUTRY WAY I N
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
I K
KATELLA AVENUE
RCL 99 -00 -15 1
1
(Res. of Int. to SE) R
RCL 99 -00 -15
RCL 66-67 -14 (
(Res. of
RCL S
SE)
CUP -
RCL 6o 67-
4
\ R
CUP 3101 1
1 1 RCL 56 -57 -93
99 -
CUP 2698 V
-0045
es. of Int. to SE) RCL 66 -6744
RCL 66 -67 -14 RCL 56 -57 -93
RCL 55 -56 -21 CUP 2264
CUP 3345 FRITZ
STONE CENTER S PORT S
BAR
I
RCL
56 -57 -93
CUP 3615
IND. FIRM
� I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 56 -57 -93
CUP 2006 -05079
CUP 585
VAR 2441
(RCL 70- 71 -34)
IND. FIRM
CUP 585
- -*— 209'
� t I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res of Int. to S
RCL 56 -57 -93
CUP 585
9
9,
N �"9
G
�dl
XIN
SP 92 -2
CL 86 -87 -28 ` L
CIL
CUP 1464
SP 92-
VAR 1276 VAR 1717
Ix VAR 904
ROO SPEED SHOP
T (MHP)
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05079
Requested By: IDELFONSO G. MARQUEZ, JR. AND
CHERYLY.MARQUEZ
1835 South Lewis Street
10028
Anaheim Blvd Area) ~
I
I
RCL 99 -00 -15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 66 -67 -14
CUP 434
I
ALARM ONE
RCL 99 -00 -15
Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 99 -00.15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
CUP 679
F- I
W
UJ RCL 99 -00 -15 -
� (Res. of Int. to SE)
r (n
(n I
IND. FIRMS
�W
RCL 99 -00.15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 66 -67 -14
RCL 65 -66 -84
CUP 1670
I
RCL 99 -(
O -H (Res. of Int.
IND. FIR RCL 66 -f
CUP if
IND. FIF
I
RCL 99 -00 -15
es. oflnt.to S
CUP 1670
N�
RCL 99 -00.15 Q') � I
(Res. of Int. to SE) ¢ I RCL 99 -00.15
T -CUP 2001 -04436 j (Res. of Int. to SE)
CUP 3583 m I L 56 -57 -9
CUP 3148
CUP 1591
TRANSPORT
INT'L POOL
c CUP 24!
N CUP 20!
N
0
U
RCL 99 -00 -15 ��" CUP 196 Q CUP 28
(Res. of Int. to SE) ,N Z
CUP 2005 -05039 Q
T -CUP 2001 -04436 U)
CUP 3148 a 1
CUP 1591
Z AIRPORT COACH 12 CUP 2037
C M
U
1) CUP 2058 -
O 1
GENE AUTRY WAY I N
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
RCL 99 -00.15
(Res. of Int. to SE)
RCL 66 -67 -14
RCL 65 -66 -84
CUP 1670
I
RCL 99 -(
O -H (Res. of Int.
IND. FIR RCL 66 -f
CUP if
IND. FIF
I
RCL 99 -00 -15
es. oflnt.to S
CUP 1670
N�
RCL 99 -00.15 Q') � I
(Res. of Int. to SE) ¢ I RCL 99 -00.15
T -CUP 2001 -04436 j (Res. of Int. to SE)
CUP 3583 m I L 56 -57 -9
CUP 3148
CUP 1591
TRANSPORT
INT'L POOL
c CUP 24!
N CUP 20!
N
0
U
RCL 99 -00 -15 ��" CUP 196 Q CUP 28
(Res. of Int. to SE) ,N Z
CUP 2005 -05039 Q
T -CUP 2001 -04436 U)
CUP 3148 a 1
CUP 1591
Z AIRPORT COACH 12 CUP 2037
C M
U
1) CUP 2058 -
O 1
GENE AUTRY WAY I N
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Date of Aerial Photo:
July 2005
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05079 ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Requested By: IDELFONSO G. MARQUEZ, JR. AND Scale: 1"=200'
CHERYL Y. MARQUEZ Q.S. No. 98
1835 South Lewis Street 10028
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 7
7a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (Motion)
7b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05079 (Resolution)
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly- shaped, 0.5 -acre property has a frontage of 117 feet on the west side of
Lewis Street, a depth of 209 feet, and is located 517 feet south of the centerline of Katella
Avenue (1835 South Lewis Street).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit under authority of Code
Section No. 18.10.030.040.0402 to permit a mortuary to cremate and embalm human
remains in an existing industrial building-
BACKGROUND
( This property is developed with a vacant warehouse building and is zoned I (Industrial).
The Anaheim General Plan designates this property and surrounding properties for Office -
High land uses. This property is located within the Platinum Triangle.
(4) The following zoning action pertains to this property:
(a) Variance No. 2441 (to waive (a) permitted outdoor uses and (b) required masonry wall
for screening outdoor use and erect chain link fence around an outdoor industrial use
and storage area) was approved by the Planning Commission November 27, 1972.
Since outdoor uses are not proposed with this proposal, staff has included a condition
of approval requiring termination of this permit.
DEVELOPMENT PROPOSAL:
(5) The applicant requests a conditional use permit to establish a mortuary to cremate and
embalm human remains with accessory office uses within an existing 10,000 square foot
single -story industrial warehouse building. The site plan (Exhibit No. 1) indicates the
building is located on the southern portion of the property on the west side of Lewis Street.
No changes to the site plan are proposed.
(6) Vehicular access to the site is via a single driveway along Lewis Street. Code requires land
uses without a specified parking ratio to comply with requirements determined to be
reasonably necessary by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager through a parking
demand study. Based upon comparable businesses in surrounding cities, the City's
Independent Traffic and Parking Consultant has determined that the proposed land use
would require a minimum of 13 parking spaces for weekday and weekend operations. The
site plan indicates a total of 28 on -site parking spaces.
Srcup2006- 05079klw. doc
Page 1
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 7
(7) The floor plan (Exhibit No. 2) indicates the proposed cremation facility would occupy the
entire 10,000 square foot building. The proposed business would include an 8,100 square
foot area for cremation and embalming, and a 1,900 square foot area for accessory office
uses for the business. The proposed facility would include two (2) furnaces, a cooler,
stacking area, bathrooms, and a lounge.
(8) Photographs indicate an existing one -story tilt -up concrete industrial building with a smooth
plaster finish painted beige with white trim. Entryway doors for employees are located on
the east side of the building along Lewis Street and roll -up doors along the north elevation
facing the parking lot. No exterior modifications to the existing building and to the parking
lot are proposed as part of this application.
(9) The landscape plan (Exhibit No. 1) indicates the addition of three (3) Stenocarpus sinuatus,
Firewall trees in the landscaped parkway along Lewis Street. One (1) tree would be
planted north of the driveway and two (2) in front of the building. In addition, Code requires
a minimum of six (6) on -site trees — one (1) tree for every twenty (20) linear feet of street
frontage within the setback along Lewis Street, adjacent to the existing building. A
condition of approval has been added to provide the required trees. The applicant is aware
of this requirement and has agreed to comply with code.
(10) A sign plan was not submitted with this application. The applicant has indicated that the
proposed use is not open to the general public, but is merely a location for facilitating their
Page 2
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 7
existing business servicing various County Coroners, funeral homes, and cremation
societies in Southern California. Therefore, the applicant is not requesting any signage
since advertisement for identification to the public is not necessary for their proposed
business.
(11) The submitted letter of operation indicates the proposed mortuary would provide cremation
and embalming services for human remains. All deliveries would take place inside the
building to prevent visibility to the public. The mortuary would accept deliveries inside the
building by driving into the building through the existing roll -up doors closest to Lewis
Street. Access into the building would be controlled via remote to operate the roll -up doors.
The business would be a 24 -hour facility with three shifts and a minimum of two (2)
employees per shift.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(12) Staff has reviewed the proposal and the Initial Study (a copy of which is available for review
in the Planning Department) and finds no significant environmental impact and, therefore,
recommends that a Negative Declaration be approved upon a finding by the Planning
Commission that the Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead
agency; and that it has considered the proposed Negative Declaration together with any
comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the
Initial Study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the
project will have a significant effect on the environment-
EVALUATION
(13) Code permits mortuaries in the Industrial (1) Zone subject to approval of a conditional use
permit.
(14) The proposed 10,000 square foot mortuary to cremate and embalm human remains
requires a parking demand study to determine the required number of parking spaces. A
parking study dated March 31, 2006, was prepared by the City's independent traffic and
parking consultant. The parking study was conducted at two (2) sites that offered
comparable services with adjustments for operational characteristics and building sizes.
The maximum parking demand per this analysis would be 13 parking spaces. The site plan
indicates 28 parking spaces would be provided. Therefore, the City's independent traffic
and parking consultant acting on behalf of the City Traffic and Transportation Manager has
determined that the number of parking spaces provided would be adequate to support the
number of employees and customers for this use.
Page 3
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 7
(15) The subject property is located in an area that allows a variety of industrial uses including
wholesale, outdoor storage, and warehousing and distribution. Evaluation of the
operational characteristics of the proposed use, finds that the proposed mortuary is similar
in operational characteristics to general industrial use since the general public would not
patronize the business and all operations would be conducted entirely within the existing
building. In addition, the applicant has indicated that all deliveries would occur inside the
building and there would be no exterior advertisement, further minimizing the visual impact
to the general public. Because this particular property is not adjacent to residential uses,
and the likelihood of conflict with adjacent land uses is unlikely because there would be no
exterior advertisement, limited traffic for business operations, and no outdoor uses, the
proposed mortuary would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or growth and
development of the surrounding properties. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the
project, as conditioned in the attached draft resolution-
FINDINGS
(16) Before the Planning Commission grants any conditional use permit, it must make a finding
of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
(a) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by the Zoning Code, or that said use is not listed therein as being a
permitted use;
(b) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
Page 4
Aerial of subject property and neighboring businesses
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 7
(c) That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area
nor to the peace, health, safety, and general welfare;
(d) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the
area: and
(e) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
(17) Staff recommends that, unless additional or contrary information is received during the
meeting, and based upon the evidence submitted to the Commission, including the
evidence presented in the staff report, and oral and written evidence presented at the
public hearing, the Commission take the following actions:
(a) By motion, approve the Negative Declaration for the project.
(b) By resolution, approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2006 -05079 to permit a mortuary to
cremate and embalm human remains in an existing industrial building by adopting the
attached resolution including the findings and conditions contained herein.
Page 5
[DRAFT]
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006 -*'"
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2006 -05079 BE GRANTED
(1835 SOUTH LEWIS STREET)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional
Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as:
THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN
JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN
BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID ORANGE
COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN
PARCEL 2 IN THE DEED TO JACK E. RILEY AND WIFE RECORDED SEPTEMBER 13,
1956 IN BOOK 3642, PAGE 258, OFFICIAL RECORDS, SAID CORNER BEING A POINT
IN THE EAST LINE OF SAID NORTHWEST QUARTER, SOUTHERLY THEREON 968.13
FEET FROM THE NORTH QUARTER CORNER OF SAID SECTION; THENCE NORTH
1° 16' 48" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE, 336.50 TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THE LAND HEREIN DESCRIBED; THENCE CONTINUING NORTH 1
16'48" WEST, ALONG SAID EAST LINE 116.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 88° 43' 12"
WEST 231.77 FEET TO THE EASTERLY LINE OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC
RAILROAD RIGHT OF WAY THENCE SOUTHERLY ALONG SAID EAST LINE 120.15
FEET TO A POINT WHICH BEARS SOUTH 88 43'12" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT
OF BEGINNING; THENCE NORTH 88 43' 12" WEST FROM THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING, THENCE NORTH 88 12' EAST 202.39 FEET TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the
City of Anaheim on May 1, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as
required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to
hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself
and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find
and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed mortuary (to cremate and embalm human remains in an existing industrial
building) use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code
Section No. 18.10.030.040.0402; and
2. That the proposed mortuary would not adversely affect the adjacent land uses and the
growth and development of the area in which it is located because the site is surrounded by industrially -
related businesses, is not adjacent to any commercial and residential uses and the unique characteristics of
the operation would result in a facility that has no exterior advertisement, limited traffic for business
operations, and no outdoor uses; and
3. That the traffic generated by the mortuary would not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. As demonstrated by the parking
study dated March 31, 2006, the peak parking demand would be 13 parking spaces, and the site plan
indicates 28 parking spaces provided; and
Cr\PC2006 -0 -1- PC2006-
4. That granting this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, would not be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and
5. That * ** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to the subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit a mortuary to cremate and embalm human remains in an
existing industrial building; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the
declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the
basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does
hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the
safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
That this establishment shall be operated as a mortuary not open to the general public and limited to
the cremation and embalming of human remains with accessory office uses and does not include
witnessing of the process or services. If at any such time the business is no longer operated as
indicated herein, a detailed description of the proposed business shall be submitted for review by the
City's Traffic and Parking Consultant to determine if the new use would cause fewer off - street parking
spaces to be provided than the number of spaces provided on -site. If it is determined the expected
demand is greater than the spaces provided on site, an application for a variance shall be submitted to
the Planning Services Division for consideration by the Planning Commission.
2. That all doors serving the facility shall conform to the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and shall
be kept closed at all times during the operation of the premises except for ingress /egress, permitted
deliveries, and in cases of emergency.
3. That there shall be no outdoor storage permitted on the premises.
4. That roof - mounted equipment shall be screened from view in accordance with the requirements of
Anaheim Municipal Code No. 18.38.170 pertaining to roof - mounted equipment. Said information shall
be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits.
5. That 4 -foot high street address numbers shall be displayed on the roof of the building in a color that
contrasts with the roof material. The numbers shall not be visible from the streets or adjacent
properties. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
6. That the existing chain link gate shall be replaced with a decorative wrought iron gate and shall remain
unlocked and open during business hours to provide vehicular and pedestrian access to required on-
site parking. That said gate shall not be installed in such a manner that may adversely affect vehicular
traffic on the adjacent public street. The installation of a new gate shall conform to the Engineering
Standard Plan No. 475 and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager prior to issuance of a building permit.
7. That the driveway on Lewis Street shall be reconstructed to accommodate a ten (10) foot radius curb
return in conformance with Engineering Department Standard No. 115. Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits-
-2- PC2006-
8. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by the provision of regular
landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty -four (24)
hours from time of occurrence.
9. That all trash generated from this facility shall be properly contained in trash bin(s) contained within the
approved trash enclosure(s). The number of bins shall be adequate and the trash pick -up shall be as
frequent as necessary to ensure the sanitary handling and timely removal of refuse from the property.
10. That trash storage areas shall be refurbished to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department,
Streets and Sanitation Division to comply with approved plans on file with said Department.
11. That adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and
grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide
adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises
during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and
vehicles on -site. Said lighting shall be decorative and complementary to the architecture of the
building. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Police Department,
Community Services Division approval.
12. That signage for subject facility shall be prohibited. Any proposed signage shall be subject to approval
by the Planning Commission as a Reports and Recommendations item.
13. That no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage uses.
14. That an on -site trash truck turn around area shall be provided per Engineering Standard Detail No. 476
and shown on plans as required by the Department of Public Works, Street Sweeping and Sanitation
Division. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits.
15. That a Fire Emergency Listing Card, Form APD -281, shall be completed and submitted to the Police
Department. The form is available at the Police Department front counter.
16. That the landscape plan shall indicate the addition of three (3) Stenocarpus sinuatus, Firewall tree, in
the landscaped parkway along Lewis Street, one (1) north of the existing driveway and two (2) in front
of the building and fifteen (15) feet from the utility pole. In addition, the landscape plan shall indicate
the addition of six (6) 24 -inch box sized trees within the front landscaped setback along Lewis Street.
Any decision made by staff regarding said plans may be appealed to the Planning Commission as a
Reports and Recommendations item. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted
for building permits.
17. That the property owner shall submit a letter requesting termination of Variance No. 2441 (to waive (a)
permitted outdoor uses and (b) required masonry wall for screening outdoor use and erect chain link
fence around an outdoor industrial use and storage area) to the Zoning Division.
18. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3, and as conditioned herein.
19. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this
resolution, or within one (1) year from the date of this resolution whichever occurs first, Condition Nos.
4, 5, 6, 7, 11, 14, 16, and 17, above mentioned shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to
complete said conditions shall be granted in accordance with Section No. 18.60.170 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
20. That prior to final zoning and building inspections, Condition Nos. 10, 15 and 18, above - mentioned,
shall be complied with-
-3- PC2006-
21. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State, and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the
request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and
all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared
invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related
to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or
prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges
shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 1, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, "Zoning
Provisions — General" of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRMAN. ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify
that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission
held on May 1, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES:
COMMISSIONERS:
NOES:
COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT:
COMMISSIONERS:
VACANT:
COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
, 2006.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-4 PC2006-
Attachment - Item No. 7
SOUTHWEST MORTUARY
PARKING STUDY
1835 Lewis Street
Anaheim, CA
Prepared for:
Prepared by:
► Rafiq &
L f>ssociates, Inc.
March 31, 2006
Table of Contents
Section
Page
L
Introduction
1
II.
Project Location
1
III.
Site Description
1
a. Existing Site
1
b. Proposed Site
1
c. Characteristics
1
IV.
Site Uses
1
V.
Parking Requirements
1
VI.
Similar Site Survey
2
VII.
Code - required parking for office portion
2
VIII.
Similar Site Parking Counts
3
IX.
Methodology of Study
4
X.
Findings
4
XI.
Recommendations and Conclusions
5
I. Introduction
Southwest Mortuary is an existing firm that provides transportation services to funeral homes. A
site has been chosen at 1835 Lewis Street that they wish to use as a crematorium. It is an
existing 10,000 square foot single -story building, that contains 1,000 square feet of office space.
There is no parking rate specified in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code for a crematorium,
consequently, a parking study is required to determine the parking requirements.
II. Project Location
The site is 1835 Lewis Street.
III. Site Description
a. Existing Site
The existing site contains a 10,000 square foot industrial building that includes a 1,000
SF office.
b. Proposed Site
The applicant wishes to re- purpose the existing building. They also wish to evaluate an
propose to expand the office from 1,000 SF to 1,900 SF, within the existing building.
This study will evaluate the parking needs of the two uses: 8,100 SF as a crematorium
and 1,900 SF of office.
C. Characteristics
The site contains 28 parking spaces. There is one driveway on South Lewis that serves
this site. There will be doors that open to allow vans to enter the building for pick -ups
and deliveries, so that these activities do not occur outside.
IV. Site Uses
The site will operate 24 -hours a day, 7 -days a week.
V. Parking Requirements
There is no parking rate specified in the Municipal Code for this use. Surveys of similar sites
have been taken, and a parking count at a site similar in nature to this site was conducted.
1
VI. Similar Site Survey
The following sites were surveyed to determine how similar they were to the intended project
site. A table of their characteristics is provided that summarized this survey. Based upon a
phone survey, the Macera site in Santa Ana was chosen to survey because its business was
limited strictly to cremations. There is no parking lot, consequently the vehicles parked in the
alley and along the street were observed during a one -lay count.
Crematorium Survey to select similar site
Name
Location
Hours of
Number of
Amenities & services
operation
cases
O'Connor
Laguna Hills
8 AM-
70 -100 /month
Chapel for 200
Mortuary
lOPM
55% are
Cremations and embalming
cremations
4 meeting rooms
1 drawing room
Loma Vista
Fullerton
Cemetery, mortuary,
Memorial Park
mausoleum, chapel
Crematorium has 5
chambers (1 for witnessing)
Community
Whittier
8 hours
125 -150 /year
Crematory
Crematory
M -Sat
60% are
Funeral home
cremations
Macera
Santa Ana
24 hours
400 - 500 /mo.
Crematory has 4 chambers
Witnesses are allowed
5,500 square feet
VII. Code - required parking for office portion
The following is an excerpt from the City of Anaheim Municipal Code for Non - Residential
Parking requirements, Section 18.42.040 for Non - Residential Parking Requirements.
.010 Parking Spaces. Non - residential off - street parking requirements for automobiles and
other vehicles shall be determined by the type of use (use class) associated with the property.
Table 42 -A (Non - Residential Parking Requirements) specifies the number of parking spaces for
each non - residential use, regardless of the zone district in which the use is located.
.0101 For uses not listed, parking requirements may be those determined to be
reasonably necessary by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. The City Traffic and
Transportation Manager maUequire a parking study in order to make this determination
2
.0102 Except as expressly provided in this section, within a business unit containing
more than one (1) use class, the minimum number of parking spaces shall be based on the use
class with the highest parking requirement If a combination oLparking ratios applies, the
number of required spaces shall be the sum total of the requirements for each type of use
¢ctnhlichod
The parking rate per Section 18.42.040 of the Municipal Code states that for general offices, 4
spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA are required for buildings of 3 stories or lower.
VIII. Similar Site Parking Counts
Parking counts were taken on Wednesday, March 22, 2006 at the Macera Crematorium in Santa
Ana at 1920 Fuller Street. There is no parking lot, so parking was observed along the east and
west side of the building.
Macera Parking
Stud
Project # 06- 1088 -001
City: Santa Ana
Day:
Wednesday
Location: 1020 Fuller
Date:
3/22/2006
TIME
EASTSIDE
WESTSIDE
PARKED CARS
# OF PEOPLE
PARKED CARS
# OF PEOPLE
7:00 AM
0
0
0
0
7:15 AM
0
0
1
2
7:30 AM
1
1
0
0
7:45 AM
0
0
0
0
8:00 AM
1
1
0
0
8:15 AM
0
0
1
1
8:30 AM
1
1
0
0
8:45 AM
0
0
1 0
0
4:00 PM
0
0
0
0
4:15 PM
0
0
0
0
4:30 PM
0
0
0
0
4:45 PM
0
0
0
0
5:00 PM
0
0
0
0
5:15 PM
0
0
0
0
5:30 PM
0
0
0
0
5:45 PM
0
0
0
0
TOTALS
3
3
2
3
3
The highest parking demand at this similar site at any time was only one vehicle. The
cumulative total number of vehicles observed during the day was three.
IX. Methodology of Study
The Southwest Mortuary desires to establish a crematorium that will have a 1,900 SF office and
an 8,100 square foot crematorium. There will not be any family members allowed at this
location. The parking demand for this site is based on a combination of the code - required
parking for the office portion and the observed parking demand from the similar site, factored up
due to unequal sizes of sites.
Office Parking
Eight parking spaces are required for the office (4 parking spaces /TSF X 1.9 TSF =8 spaces) per
Section 18.42.040 of the Municipal Code
Crematory
Because the proposed site is one and one half times as large as the similar site, the parking count
has been factored up. The factor is based on the ratio of the proposed site to the similar site
(8,100/5,500 =1.5). Multiplying the factor 1.5 by the 3 parking spaces observed, results in 4.5
spaces. This is rounded up to 5 parking spaces.
In summary, the Southwest Mortuary would need a minimum of thirteen parking spaces onsite:
eight parking spaces for the 1,900 SF office and five parking spaces for the 8,100 square foot
crematorium. Based on the site plan provided, there are 28 spaces provided. This will
accommodate the anticipated parking demand, with a surplus of 15 parking spaces.
X. Findings
Finding Number .0101 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause
fewer off - street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such
spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and
reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation ofsuch use.
Southwest Mortuary will provide adequate parking onsite for its intended use.
Finding Number .0102 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate
vicinity of the proposed use.
Southwest Mortuary will provide adequate parking onsite, and no on- street parking is
anticipated for this use.
lq
Finding Number .0103 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for
such use under an agreement in compliance with subsection 18.42.050.030 (Non- Residential)
Southwest Mortuary will provide adequate parking onsite, and no overflow parking is
anticipated to occur upon adjacent private property.
Finding Number .0104 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed
use.
Southwest Mortuary will provide sufficient parking onsite, and no increased congestions is
anticipated along South Lewis Street.
Finding Number .0105 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
Southwest Mortuary will provide adequate parking within the onsite parking lot, and the
vehicles exiting and entering the site will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from
adjacent properties.
X1. Recommendations and Conclusions
The proposed crematorium site at the Southwest Mortuary at 1835 Lewis Street contains 28
parking spaces. This is adequate to accommodate the anticipated parking demand of 13 parking
spaces if the site operates as stated, and no family members are allowed to enter the site. If this
policy changes, and family members are allowed into the site for witnessing, additional parking
spaces may be required. It is our understanding that a condition will be placed on the project,
that a new parking study will be required if the site becomes open to family members or if
additional services will be provided.
ITEM NO. 7
Southwest Mortuary Services, Inc.
March 1, 2006
CITY OF ANAHEIM
Planning Department
Planning Services Division
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Anaheim, CA 92805
Re: LETTER OF OPERATION:
Southwest Mortuary Services, Inc.
1835 S. Lewis St.
Anaheim, CA 92805
Dear Planning Department:
1. Complete description of proposed use. Southwest Mortuary Services, Inc, has
been a family owned and operated business proudly serving the residents and the
funeral community in Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, San Bernardino and San Diego
Counties for over 30 years. One of our many services includes doing the removals
(removing the deceased from the place of death) for the above mentioned County
Coroners offices, as well as the removals for dozens of funeral homes and cremation
societies throughout Southern California.
We recently purchased the building at 1835 S. Lewis Street with the intent to expand our
business by being able to better serve our business partners. To accomplish this we
need to offer the following services:
a. Cremate human remains
b. Embalm human remains
Our proposed use includes installing two "retorts" (cremation chambers)
and one "Prop room" that allows us to prepare /embalm the deceased for
either viewing and/or in some cases, (when the deceased is to return to a
far-away home) extended travel.
2. Days and hours of operation. Do to the nature of our business, we staff our offices
and make deliveries 24171365.
3. Numberof employees per shift. We have three daily shifts of 8 hours each. We
have a minimum oft employees per shift,
Toll Free (888) 993-2555
counly'l
b
Z00 /L0012 We NO.
M Gnt goolt/Zo/E0
Southwest Mortuary Services, Inc.
I'YI n•'' rli'. ,. •�1'h'1 l'.I I''
II'ill�!K,tii: V.' 1G }OSll {Q�'I�i,CMt]�C@';'ri',:: ilrJi'l l "••':i
M -1
r � � � •�,." ... "i •.li: I I'. � !I I± .. q I'•I'v � �!'� , I Ivy, n.!•; '.,•: I. �. i �,n .
Deliveries:
The way the building is set up, the driver would drive into the warehouse through the roll -
up door closest to Lewis St (East door). All drivers will be able to open and close the
warehouse roll -up doors via remote control. Upon entering the building, the driver will
immediately close the door behind him. The driver would then park the van very close to
cooler door, where the transfer from the van to the cooler would take place. After the
transfer is complete, the driver would open, via remote control the warehouse door
closest to the train tracks (West door) to exit the building. There will never, ever, under
any circumstance be a situation were our business neighbors or any member of the
general public would ever see anything inside our building that would indicate the nature
of our business. In the event an individual were standing at the East roll -up door as it
opened, the person would see either a blank wall, or possibly the back of a few personal
cars of some of the employees_
It currently takes 14 vans to accommodate our business needs. When not in use, the
vans are parked towards the rear of the building, closet to the train tracks. Deliveries will
be made 24/71365.
Use of building space:
Currently, our building is approximately 10,000 square feet with a little over a 1,000
square feet of office space built into it. In the near future, our intentions are to add at
least another 1,000 square feet of office space. The way the building is designed,
meaning the way our vans will need to enter the building at the east door and exit
through the west door, almost half the building will be used as a driveway for the
deliveries_ With the existing offices, planned offices, the cooler and the "prep" room,
along with the two retorts the building will be near it's capacity.
Signage:
The only signage that will ever be on our building will be our address numbers. No other
signage will ever be posted on the building.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
Sincerely,
Southwest Mortuary Services, Inc.
,::Q
Idelfonso Marquez, Jr.
President
Toll Free (888) 993 -2555
'li
;I
'} ' :L p'i ��. 'tlf • r S ff }i!
�i
,',.
�•T� ' Xt' �
t
�' n
q . ,.!I i'�' L
l n i' "' ' 'il ' I : L, •
i !
;
.1 J7
X71 Q„ �pyn.9
" riverside C'n�rkr,I +, n •
'�
, „
nl,Qs� s �d;9�'
I� �� ' •' i
,�.
�, �� �
„ ..,' �,•
b�gq;�3c�i'ti[rrp'i1:n:
!'.!'.,,
� ••
trdtenw"
,. , ; ; � � ��.'�' � � ,.I
,,,�, ..
.�•.''.'�, 1;
CUP Na, t,o m 0 5 0,
zoo /zoom xej so:st soot /zo/eo
ITEM NO. 7
02/27/00 MON 14:18 FAX 5027770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP FA 001
OV- 70/2003' 11 :02 DIr45554B0 NOR - CAL CREMATORY PAGE 01
:advanced Air Te stigg, L Eiayw ara, c ,�,.(sla 7a} 5.203p
Compliance Source Emissions 'hest Roaport
$ubmitte$ Ta:
Nor -Cal Crematory
Sacramento, CA
Subject:
Particulate (PM) Emissions
Source Test Results
Reference:
Sacramento Metropolitan
AQMD A/C
#16870
Source(s):
American Cremation Chamber
Model A-200 HT
Test Date(s): May 28, 2003
Submitted: July 21, 2003
Submitted By:
Advanced Air Testing, LLC
23588 Connecticut Street Bldg 01
Hayward, CA 94545
(510) "S—"N FAX (510) 785.2039
Email- airtest@pacbell.net
al ;a
02/27/06 MON 14:18 FAX 5627770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP 1?j 002
07/39/2003 11:02 9164555486 NOR -CAL CREMATORY PAGE 02
Advanced Air Testing L,L,C Building # 1 ect,aui Strout
�S Gia 1arJrSaecsErrt anTeftPAFEaxuxsTesN Hayward, Californl a 94546
(510) 785
(510) 785 -2039 Fm
Rma11: airtqst o
July 21, 2003
Nor -Cal Crematory
6231 Alpine Ave, Suite 8
Sacramento, CA 95826
Attn.: Mr, Craig Strunk
Subject: Compliance PM emissions test report of the American Cremation Chamber, Modnl A - 200 HT, owned
and operated by Nor -Cal Crematory Jocatod at the address referen.ccd above. The test objects rr. is to demonstrate
compliance with. the Rules and particulate matter limitation Condition No_ 6, as set forth by the Sacramento
Metropolitan Air Quality Management District (SMAQMD) Authority To Construct (amendec ):: A/C No.: 16870.
Test Date(* MAY ?N, 2003
Sampling Location. Sampling was conducted at the exhaust stack sampling port loeate:f approximately —2
diameters upstream and >6 diameters downstream from the nearest flow disturbance.
Teat Results. Particulate emissions test results are contained in Table #1 following this tt:x €. The compliance
parameter(s) and their tespocted limit(s) are summarized below:
Emitted rM Concentration
A verage
District Limiit�
PM, jr 1)SCF corr. to 12% CO2
0.031
I SD.
Comments: All PM emissions are assumed to be ?MID, The incinerator source test results demonstrate
compliance with A/C•conditioits and meet District requirements for particulate matter emissions.
Particulate matter test QA /QC includes porforming leak checks of the sampling system to the : nd of the sampling
nozzle before aad after each test run, leak checking the Pilot tubes and checking 'for cyclar:ic. flows in. the duct
before starting the lest. All of these method error analyses were co'nduclad within the method : Ilowablc limits.
The crematory chamber was preheated and maintained to a minimum ternperatu.re of A least 1600 F prior t0, and
for the duration of the incinerator source test program.
Sampling Personnel: Jeff Meslob and Burt Kusich of Advanced Air Testing LLC (AAT) performed the samptin.g
program.
Observing Personnel: Ady Santos of the Sacramento Metropolitan AQMD was present to ol:servc during the test
program.
Process Description: Nor-Cal Crematory operates a 26 square foot hearth; natural gas fired, .American Cremation
Chamber, Model #A- 200 -UT crematory for the incineration process of deceased human ranains at the above
refcrcnced crematory facility Located in Sacramento, CA. For fvrther erematcry process description., please rcfcr to
the Authority To Construct (A /C) appended to this report.
r�intuw�mam v1.r.t.o.m�rt�n+�r�.i .
02/27/06 RON 14:19 FAX 5627770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP Q003
87/38/28B3 11:82 9164555488 NOR -CAL CREMATORY PAGE 03
Test Program: Triplicate 60- minute test runs for particulate matter (PM) were performed at :hr, exhaust stack of
the crematory referenced above. Also for each test the percentage of Oxygen (02) and Dioxi Carbon (CO2) in
the stream was measured using Tedlar bags, EPA Method 3A and 18.
Eaclt sample train was recovered on site and placed in uniquely labeled containers_ The swripics were rcturncd to
AAT and analyzed according w CARB Method 5. The integrated bag samples collected for each run were
analyzed for CO2 and Oz using coutinuous emission monitors (CEM)_ '
All filter media acrd post - test sample fractions were stabilized (0.5mg) and weighed in tripliaitc to the nearest 0.1
tog on an American Scieutifte Product Model 182 balance. The back -half fractions (impir.;;ers containing de-
ionized water and Mika gel) Were measured for moisture, organic and inorganic particulates. Lab results and lab
sample data sheets are contained in section (B), Laboratory Reports, appended to this report.
Sampling Methods: The fallowing soutce test. methods were used;
CARE Method 5 Particulate Matter Determination (Including E 11, condensabtes)
GARB Method 3A Molecular Weight, OY and CO2 Concentratiolr
EPA Method 18 Tedlar bag for CO2 &. 02 Analysis
CARB Methods 1, 2 & 4 Volumetric Flow Rate and Moisture
Equipment: The following sampling equipment was used:
RAC Method 5- Meter Module
TW 42s Scientific Calculator with BASIC Isokinetic Program
T{ -Type Thermocouple with Beckman Industrial HD 110 T Readout
Advanced Air Testing CARE M - Umbilical, Inconel Probe, and glass Impinger Set
90mm Filters and glass holders
Air -guide Compensated Barometer
Summit CO2 Analyzer and Siemens 02 Analyzer
Appendices: Calculations (A), Laboratory Report (B), Field Data Sheets (C), QA/QC Ec aipment Calibration
sheets (A), Sampling System Diagram(s) (E), Scum, Test Plan (F) and Permit To Operatr, or Autbority To
Construct (0), are appended to this report.
The details and results contained within this report are to the best of AAT's knowledge an at. thentic and accurate
repres✓'otation of the test program. If this report is submitted for Compliance purposes, it should only be
reproduced in its entirety.
If thvo are any questions concerning this .report, or if Advanced Air Testing, LLC can'be of far Sher service, please
contact Dan Canner or Tammi L. Kelly at (510) 785 -2030.
i
Submitted by, Re i ed by,
Dan Cartner Tammi L. Kelly
Sr. ProjoctManager Operations Manager
C�ygpyq,ry'�ylylNhmlm „MN.I<,�7n1a9+ ,
02/27/09 MON 14:19 FAX 5627770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP 0 004
07/30/2003 11:02 91645554138 NOR -CAL CREMATORY PAGE 64
ADVANCED AIR TESTING, LLC RAYWA", "'A (5113) 755 -2030
TABLE #11
Particuilote Emission. Results
Nor -Cat Crematory
Cremation Chamber
A!C #16870
ICON4
1
2
3
AV1:l3A.G7,
T.IhirrS
TEST DATE
05/28/03
05/28/03
05/28/0;1
TEST TlNfJ3
1010 -1118
1252.1357
1540 -1646
SAWL.E VOLUME SCF)
28.953
25,242
26.445
XSCIICINL'TIC %
ion
96
93
)6
DUCT TEMPERATURE ff)
1130.3 1
1134.0
1126.0 1
11 30.1
VELOCITY fr/sec
20.5
185
19.4
9.4
GAS FLOW RATE (ACM
2,552
2,298
2,408
2.. M1zo
GAS PLOW BATE 29CFK
754
681
735
23
H (Volulrte %)
11.7
11,1
8.9
(1,6
0 (volt== %)
12.6
13.8
14,3
1 i
CO (volume %)
5,80
4.90
420
57
F.H, Partiailate Conc. r/ASCF )
0.0038
0.0094
0.0193
0'.)108
F.Xd. Particulate.Enrissions Lhs/1u
0.0244
0.0546
0.1213
0.1668
0r anic Condexlsiblc Canc, /DSC
0.0003
0.0003
0.0003
6,)003
Organic Candensiblc Ettussiuns (LboN
0.0017
0.0018
0.0018
0,)01.8
Inorganic Condensible Conc. /DS
0.0015
0.0004
0.0005
0,)008
Iooi aaic Condensible Emissions LLW /hr)
o.oloo
010021
0.0029
0.)050
Total PM Conc. r/DSCF
11.0056
0.0100
0.0200
0. )119
Total PTV[ Conc. (gr/DSCF) Q 12% CO
o.ol)6
0.0246
0.0572
0,61
0.1
Total FM Emissions (Lbs/hr)
0.0361
0.0585
1 0.1261
1 0. )736
DSCF = Sample Vokuue in 1h9 Standard Cubic Feet H volume "1. = Stack gas pert! tut water vapor
DSCFM- DLyStandardCebirFcctpc+'Minuto gr1DSCF= Pardculateeonc4rMN .ioningrainsperD
ACPM Actual Cubic Fed.per Min= F.H_ Particulate = Fmnt Half or zltexable Patticutatc
PM = Particulate Mattct
organic Pgrti'miate = Candmsibin organic Patticmaw (solvent extract) in the 13ank4Wf
Inorganic PartiCdate = Condensible In°rgamc Particulate (Acirls dt Sulfates) in the Back-Hatf
CALCULATIONS
Lbs/hr Emission rate = 0,00857 * gir/DSCF * DSCF.M.
Correction to 12% CO, = gr/.DSCF * 12 / CO2%
J'
02/27/06 MON 14:20 FAX 5627770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP
07/90/2003 11:02 9164555499 NOR--:AL. CPF- MATORY
Standard Abbreviations for Reports
V005
FACE 07
unit
Abbreviation
Unit
Abbreviation
billion
NSAPCD - Northern Srmerna
68 1?
µg .
Brake horsepower
bhp
milligram
mg
Brake horsepower hour
bhp -hr
milliliter
nd
British'Tbermal Unit
pBw
million
MM
capttae efficiency
CE
rainute
Inin
destructionefficicnoy
DE
Nivicu larWeight
M
Dry Standard Cubic Feet
DSCF
nanogram
ng
Dry Standard Cubic Feet par Nfinute
DSCFM
Parts per Billion
ppb
Dry Standattl Cubic Meter,
DSCM
Puts per Million
PPM
Dry Standard Cubic Mega per Minute
DSCMM
pennyweight per firkin
pw /fkn
grains per dry standard cubic foot
sr/DSCF
pound
lb
grain
g
pounds per hour
lbs/hr
,grants per Brakc horsepower hour
LVbbp -hr
pounds per million Btu
11ssRv[ivlBtu
kilowatt
kW
second
Sao
liter
1
Specific Volurne, felib -Mr ,a
SV
Megawatts
MW
Thousand
k
MCbC;r
m
Watt
W
Common Conversions / Calculations / Constants
1 gram = 15.432 grains
1 pound = 7000 grain,
grams per pound = 453.6
bhp =1.344 * Engine kW, (whom po gitte kW — Generator kW output / 0.95) Q 95°1 aiifciency
Wbhp- hr— lbsllu * 453.61 bhp
2.59 &9 = Conversion factor far ppm to lbs /scf; EPA 40CM60.45
dwf / MhiMTU = 6710 for NaOuai gas; EPA Method 19
BtWfV =1040 far Natural Cass; EPA Malhod 19
lb/hr PjrL Emission Rate = 0.00857 • gx /dscf * dsr*h IPA Method 5
Ibs/hr =ppm l5V x dscfin x M * 60; CARD Mothod 100; where SV b 38SE @ 68 or w 379V t"7r, 60°F.
Cormerimt to 12% CO - gr /dscf • 12%a / stack C01Yo, EPA Method S
Cotrection to 3 /a C x — ppm * 17.91.(20.9- stack 02 %); CARD Method 100
Correction to 15 % 0 a ppm * 5.91(203 - stack 02 %): CARD Method 100
dacfai= Ciao Fd * MMBtolmin * 20,91(20.9 - stack 02 `A); EPA Method 19
IhaAN Btd= Fd • M * ppm * 2.598 -9 * 20.9 / (20.9 - 9taak 0 T.); EPA Method 19
,n, _ •Iwelo�W\•••J Ann..mMl•1tnIIN_A AT Ar.dIR1mml
Standard Temperatures by District
EPA
68 OF
NSAPCD - Northern Srmerna
68 1?
CA"
69 Of
PCAPCD . Plamr
68 T
BAAQUD -13ay Axes
70T
swr-APCD - San Luis Obinpn
60 17
SMAPCf1- San Joaquin
60 `P
SMAQMD - 9e0arutoto
68 "N do thou
SCAQ,NW - South Coast
60 IF
SCAQMD - Shasta County
GS 7F
M$UAPCD - MoukxrY Bay
60 OF
YSAPCD - Yolo- Solano
60 IF
,n, _ •Iwelo�W\•••J Ann..mMl•1tnIIN_A AT Ar.dIR1mml
02/27/06 MON 14:20
FAX 5627770025
AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP
0006
07130/2003 11:eZ
'9164555409
NCR -COL CREMATORY
PAGE 99
ADVANCED AIR TF,STING, LLC
Horomdric Pnaa.,P
Static Pia
HAV WAUp, C (s in) 1 FW n30
30,02
-0
PARITCULATE XMISSION CALCULATIONS
-- E'O
- ' F H'D
'�-
Pt
inc6�s
FACILITY:
Nor -Cal CrcMg= DATE:
SrW03 METER HOy NO.:
RAC 7
UNIT:
TIME:
1 010.1118 YROHE NO.:
Inn
Permit Number.
A/C #16970 TVST NO.:
7- NOZZLE KQ.:
44
srne4 DiamHr
7013
9,..0., ".. -t
Ti. nr
P'rtnt Factny C
Gas VnlUmo(VmJ.B= (Tue }•Vm Yff (Py +AH713.G) /((T +qGO) "29.92)=
0,8
Motor Tanp., Tm
"F
106.1
�.
T_w tal H,D Cond d3
'V�,
81.0
Horomdric Pnaa.,P
Static Pia
"Hg
"H
30,02
-0
MelerPrem = A4 .. _
X ' ' d --
Stack A rca,A,
Nezalcllic - 6"
-- E'O
- ' F H'D
'�-
Pt
inc6�s
0.8
O.ZOS
2,074
_ 0,494
Tote) F .H. Parrieuln e,
B .fI. Or�nicn,
H.H. Inorganics, _ - --
-- mF
m5
- m6
7,1
0.5
2.9
Stack Ptsaawrc, P
"Hg 30.02
Stack Ta p.. T 'F 1130.3
Stank O3 ! % _
12.6
Semple Tim
mina
60 .0
1•Sekr Facb= Yd
0.99 10_
Stook Gaff CO
Stack Gen N,
g;
•.h
S.80
81.6
T,a 70
Samplo Volume, V 31.043
A)
Gas VnlUmo(VmJ.B= (Tue }•Vm Yff (Py +AH713.G) /((T +qGO) "29.92)=
2B.953 DSCF
H)
Volume H 0 evl lactad( V ) =&.914813.5
3.827' SCP
C)
Total Sample Volumn M) (V +(VAd=
32.780 qCP
D)
Moistpm Comml(IAH 100'(V l lV,)
11.7
47
Stack Gar VClomW (Va) - SSASI C, 4(4P) (P +460 /MW, PJ w
20,511 'R/floc
17
Stack Gan Mok.ular Wt ,=((COi7b +OaYa•0.3Z +Ns".fi" 018 )(1- H'Ovd100))+18(Hpm (10)=
25.097 g/g -mole
G)
•/a lsokinatic( n- 91az• Sx( V +460y((D „�(6)fP,J(V,J(T
100 7'n
11)
ACFM =(VXA,)60 =
2,552 ACFM
1)
Smek Ono Vol. Flow Rah, DSCCM=(Va(A KGO)1(T +460)J(p.)[I- %H "2,005 =
754 DSCFM
.f)
F.H. Particolme CancentrAGmt (gr /DSCF)= mg/Vmstd • 0.01543 =
0.0038 eD9CF
Iq
F- K.7miiculatc Emission Ratc -0 ,00857 "gr /DSCF•DSCFM-
D.024 Lbr/hr
L)
D.H. Organics Conem"rion(gt)DSM m /(V",) 4 0.01543=
0.0003 gr/DSCF
NI)
B.H. Otguni= Emission Rate ° 0.00857 • gr/DSCF " DSCF# =
0.002 Lbsdir
N)
H.H. luorlmnic Cvnoonindon (gdD8CF) - mW(V.a).n " D.D 1543 =
0.00113 gr/OSCF
0)
D.H. Inorganic EmissirmRa lc= 0.00857!gd08CF
0,010 Lb-Air
P)
Tot - Particulao Concentration (gr /dsct)= mg/(V 0.01543=
0.0050 gr /DSCF
Q)
Tot. PartieUlata Co»emtratim M I2 %n CO,) =gfjQSCF c 12 / CC,%=
0.011( gr/DSCF
R)
Tc4 Particulate Emission Ratc =0,00857 "gr/0SCF +DSCFM-
9.035 Lbs/hr
02/27/06 MON 14:20 FAX 5627770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP
R7r.9arzaas 11:112 y764bb5498 NOR -CAL CREMATORY
0007
PAGE 09
ADVA AIR TEST11V6, LLC Flay W Attn, CA (0110 7X5 -ZWu
PATUICULATF, F112TS5ION CALCULAMNS
FACUXrY: Nor•C=J, Crmnawry DATE: 5128103 MISTER BOX No.: RAC `/
UNIT: Cremation Chamber TIME: 1252 1252 - 135 _PRONE NO,; Inc
CONDITION: A/C #16870 TEST NO.: 2 NOZZLE NO: 44
Stick Orome - 19.5 n........._t. r.a nri
eitot Fac C
Gav Volume( V Ma -( 1'+ qb0) aV Y3 •(P " +Aplt3.4)1((T
0.840
Meta Temp.,T
°F ..
1)11,0
T otalB" Candang
V
¢7.0
parametric Prsss., P.
Sta Presau rnnm
"Hg
a A a O
30,02
7 0.04
Meter Press -,AH n H�O
Avenge d�P, ^J "H
—
0. 6
0.187
Taca.1 P.H. Pa rticulol •.,m EL
E.IT, O; nni=x, _
_
15.3
0.5
Stack Pr P,
"Hg
30,02
Smck Area, A,
Ft LL
2,074
_
H.H. Inorganics,
mg
- 0.6
Stack Temp., T.
°P
1134,0
Ntvezle Die., D
^ la dles
11.49
Stark Can Oy� -- -
%
•- 13-8
S Xmplc Tim.O
miss
60.0
Meta Fa Y
0.002 LbWhr
0.9910
stock Can C4
N •
4 -90
Sal. Tmn " °F
r,
'10
S.mptt Vatumc, V
.' 27.20
Pt 27.262
—
stack Qas N,
g5
gl,}
A)
Gav Volume( V Ma -( 1'+ qb0) aV Y3 •(P " +Aplt3.4)1((T
25.242 D5CF
B)
�
Volume H 2 O ectlecred (V,,.). 8,9148E- 5 *(T„ +460 *V
) w=
3.166 SCF
Cl
I
Total Sample Volumc(VJld (V Jaa +(Y ")na=
28407 SCF
D)
MoaWmCont- nt(%H1O)- IpO *(Y /CYJ
11 -1 %
R)
Stank Can Vclacity(VA) - 8509 C 4(AP)(T, +46011AW, PJm
18.469 Ws=
F)
Stack Gas Molecular WL= ((COs%N?.44+0a%n *0.32 +Nt % *0. 28)(1- H /l 00))+lS(1110
.7R.073 glg -male
G)
%lsokinctic( 9142. 88( V,)( T +460)!((De)(OKp,)(YO(Tga+4(0))°
96 %
H)
ACFM= CVrxAJ
2,298 ACFM
1)
Stack Gas Vol- FIcW Rate, DSCFM=( V,)( A, HI TNa' 1 ` 46h)!( T,+b60))(P,1(I- YH
681 DSCrwm
J)
F -H. Particulateebneenfmtien (g103CF) ^mg/Vmatd "0.41543-
0.0094 BrfDSCF
1 Q
F.H. Paticulate Eminion Rstc = 0.00857 * 8r1DSC'F • DSCPM =
0.055 I.6slhr
1.)
0.0003 gr /DSCF
W
341. Orppnics Emission Rat-= 0.00457`g /DSCF *OSCFM =
0.002 LbWhr
N)
6. H.I norganicCencmttmtion (gr /DSCP)= mg/(V c , ),,,ao.a1$43=
0 -0004 gr/Dsu
0)
B.H. Inarpphin Emission Ram - 0.00857 *srtoSCF *DSCFM -
0 -002 LbWhr
P)
Tar. Paniculam ConML19ion (gr /dcot) = mg/(V „a' 0 -01543 -
0.0100 grIDSCF
0)
Tot Particulate Coaemmion( @12 %CC gr/DSCF *12 /cc, %-
0.0246 grIDSCF
R)
Tot. Particulate Emission Rak- 0.00857 * g /DSCF' DSCFM =
01059 Ghg1(1r
02/27/06 MON 14:21 FAX 5627770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP Z008
07/ "30/2003 11:02 91645556ES NOR -CAL CREMATORY PAGE 10
ADVANCED AIR TESTING, LLC : WAYWARD, CA (510) 195 -10.10
PARUCULATE EINSSSIDN CALCULATIONS
FACILITY:
Nor -G.1 Cmnsmry DATE: 5/28107
METkRB07f NO -:
RAC7
UNIT:
CreaWim Chamba TIME; 1540 -1646
PR0,BBW0';
In0
CONDITMN:
A/C %16870 TEST NO.: 3
NDz7LENo,:
44
_
11 0,7
t 4
mg
TPex,mne4[ 1M. BK
Pilot Facw,C
(in; Volumo(V -(T. , "V *yd "(Fs +AH/)3,6�((T +460)«29.92)=
0.840
MotcrT
OF 11S.1
To m1B()rondcrow.3
_V
Z .O
B.M. -He Press,P
"Hg
7n.0
Meter Pnas.. AH
_
11 0,7
Toral F,H�Fatticulm.. _
mg
33.1)
Stac Pre ssure, Paw'
H 0
.0.04
W 6 ,
'Ni 0 .fW
B.H Orga nics,
mg
0.5
8 teck Prmum, F ,
"Hg
70.02
Sm Arc-, A,
Fes 2A74
S. H, Tnorgonics,
-
rn
0.8
Stack Temp „T.
•P
1126 -0
Noa¢le Die.,
0.494
-��%
Slac G sa Qs _ _ ._
0,0193
14.3
Sample Tlma,O
Std. T= rrp•,
mine
T
60.0
70
Meta Pa otor, Y4
8amplo Volamo, V
_ 0.9910
F 28.811
stack 0s. CO
Smck GanN
%
%
4.20
81,5
A)
(in; Volumo(V -(T. , "V *yd "(Fs +AH/)3,6�((T +460)«29.92)=
26.445
175CF
s)
VolumaH (V.) =8.9SdAE- S- (T„aMGO)
Z,599
SCF
C)
Total Sample Volumo(V,) (V -M)ma 1 "
29.044
SCF
D)
Moisture Cuntcnt (%H40) = 100 ` (v.) t (VJne-
2_9
%
E)
Stack Gas Velocity (VS) = 85.49 C 4(AP)(T, +4WMW, F,)=
19.351.
tt/sec
F)
Stack Gm Molecular Wt = 00)=
88,298
dgK ol-
G)
%Iaokineae(1)- 914Z.8g(VXT,+ 460 )1((D, -ai- 060))
95
Y
1O
ACFM= (v.)(A.)60=
2,408
ACFM
1)
Stack Gat Vol. Flow Rate, DSCFM
73S
DSCFM
d)
F.1:1• Particulate Conornbation (gr/DSCF) = mWVmstd 4 0.01543 F
0,0193
gr/DSCF
1q
F.H. PartioulareEmission Rom 0.00057• gr1DSCF a DSCFM=
OAZl
Ll'aAlr
L)
B.H. Organics Cunaeatra(ion (gr/DSCN) ° IM91M Id - 0.0 =
0.00D3
gnU6Cr
M)
B.H. Organics Emission RAtc= 0.00857" grtOSCF' DSCFrvr
0.0D2
Lbsthr
14)
B,H. Inarganio Cunccnwsiaa(gr1D5CF)= mW(V "0.01543=
0.0605
gross
O)
P.H. Enor$anic Smisaiem Raw= 0.00857•" 9r/D5CF` DSCFM °
003
LbsAir
1
Tcf. Particulate Conemmation(gr /dsef)= m8/(V
O.D200
gUASCP
0)
Tot. Panicularc Concrntration (Q 12 %CD ,) - grIDSCFa 12 /C0
0.0572
gr /D9CF
R)
Tat. Perticelatc Eml"ioa Rate = 0,00857 At/DS" t DSCFM°
0.126
Lb4lhr
,
02/27/06 MON 14:21 FAX 5627770025 AMERICAN CREMATORY EQUIP pj
07/30,'2003 11:62 9164555488 NOR. -CAL CREMATORY 009
PAGE 12
Advanced Air Testing, LLC Hagvcard CI1. ( 510) 785 -t03fl
Analytical Report
Particulate Emissions Laboratory Results
Job Name: Nor -Cal Ctemawry
Snyrcee Cremation Chamber
Sample Date! 5/28103
Aoalyat: Tammi Kelly
Lab Jri Number
Sample
ml
A3lgvtrt
tat
Net Weight
gin m
Blank
Correction
�ot. Sample w
m
R1 M5 (Pmbe/Nozzic rinse)
56.0m1
56.0m1
2,7mg
0 .0mg
2.7mg
RIMS (Filter)
WA
N/A
4.7n,g
0.3mg
4.4mg
R1M5 (FI20 traction)
274,Om1
274,Om1
Urng
O.lmg
2.9mg
R1M5 (Organic fixation)
274,Oml
274Am1
O ling
O.lrog
0.5mg
It2M5 (Pmbc/Nozale rinse)
65.0tn1
65.0ml
33mg
0.0mg
3.3mg
R2M5 (Fitter)
N/A
NIA
12,3mg
0,30g
12.Omg
R2M5 (H20 $fiction)
264,0m1
264,0zr1l
0.7mmg
0.1 mg
0.6mr
R2M5 ( Organic fraction)
264.Om1
264,Om1
O.Img
O.Img
0.5mg
R3M5 (Probe/Nozzle rinse)
71.0ml
71.Otot
25.Img
O.Omg
25.1mg
R3M5 (Filter)
NIA
N/A
8.2mg
0.3mg
7,9Mg
R3M5 (H20 fraction)
254.Om1
254.Om1
0,9mg
0.1mg
0.8mg
k3M5 (Organic fraction)
254.0m1
254.0m1
O,Otng
O.Img
0.5mg
R4MS (Acetone blank)
SO.OmI
50.0m1
0.0mg
R4M5 (Filter blank)
NIA
NIA
0,3mg
R4M5 (11I H2O hlank),(Mb1420)
2OO.Oml
200.0,711
O.lmg
RW5 (Meth. Chlor. blank),(Mborg)
150.0m1
150.0m1
0,11ng
Comments:
Calculationst
Blank coiteeled Probe/Noezic rinse -Net weigbi • ((anctano blank wtd(vol. gctone 61ank) +vol, ncemne catch)
Total Sample wt. lip Boehm -Net vrt.H sample volue,t tM /Aliquaf volartw m0- Mhli
Total Sample wt. Organic!ra=tion =nee wt Organic Iraeliana(Toid sample voluouaAliquol volume ml )-M6,,
%Aeotgne raaidue w (Nct weight Loin mg) /(benaity of aoelone rig/ml • Total sample volume ml)• 100
%DI Water t = (Ntt weight gain mly(DmSity gfwata mpfml • Tmal sample valnme Mir l00
%rdetb. Chl0r1 -1- caidua = (Net weight On tnel(pcesA(Y otMelh. Chloride mghrl *Total extraction valnme m()•I oil
Tolerance J.inaitsc
'A ncotene mid0e =0.061 % wt.
+/ DI Water residue - 0.00 I% wt
A Meth. Chloride mgidce = 0.001% ` wt.
Porticnlam weight - NA of net Wt, a l(.5 ms or 19.05 mg depn4ing upon pre isinn
Item No.
Pa¢elA GLENOAKSAVENUE
RM3
3L 2006-001]6
-L2 001 -00045 m
]L 2000 -0002] m
VAR 3823 2 F 6 RMd RCL601 -B6 S CUP 219
VAR 1356
1
RCL 53-5119
ANAHEIM UNION
HICH SCHOOL DISTRICT
RCL53 -5119
TLUP2001-06374
rcuP ZOOo-oazl6
ART D11]
ST. THOMAS KOREAN
CATHOLIC CENTER
q
s
tiut
T
5
qN
RC &52
COP 2]4
F�
i
FF II
OFFICE
RMd
-v qY
RCL 61652
RN4
RMd
RCL 5B -5981 VAR2W1
CUP 3]95
��-
RCL 69]0 -06
VAR 2111
q
CUP 1643
PEARL STREET
LWJJJ
VAR 32936
VAR 6210
p C
RMd m
COMMQ3CEPgRK
SMALL IND. FIRMS
VAR 2652
yqR 166]
RCL]i
-]2 -19
1
RCL 53-5119
ANAHEIM UNION
HICH SCHOOL DISTRICT
RCL53 -5119
TLUP2001-06374
rcuP ZOOo-oazl6
ART D11]
ST. THOMAS KOREAN
CATHOLIC CENTER
q
-
tiut
U BDO I BOO 4D0
5
GRAMERCVAVE
RC &52
COP 2]4
100 EACH GH
i
VAR2665
OFFICE
RMd
TDWNHOMES
p -
RN4
RMd
RCL 5B -5981 VAR2W1
��-
RCL 69]0 -06
VAR 2111
q
RCL 5] -58-69 �"�
BDO BDO BDU 4DU
PEARL STREET
LWJJJ
APARTMENTS
VAR 2100
p C
RMd m
RCL 5659 -88
RCL 9 -5849 a
VAR 2652
yqR 166]
SDO BDO BDO 4DU
16 D0
14 DO
GLENCRESTAVE
RCL2006U01]6
R
Rd
-8d9
VAR 3266
VAR 1192
U T9
8 D BDO 8 D
1600
id DO
CUP914
CRESCENT AVENUE
U
61a
CUP4]0
RM3
CUP 1253 Pafcel B
I
U
RS2
VAR3082
1 DU EPCH
RCL2DX 001]6
W (C
RCL 2oovo0—
RMd
ARTS.
RCL ]1 -02 -3B
0 H
VAR 174]S
VAR 17245
RCL 7172-11
Z
RS2
VAR 2366
Q
1 DU EACH
— APARTMENTS CH
iDU � 2]00
VAR 226]
D S i
VACANT
40 DU
SqN
w
`ADreFLPL
RIA4
f j� DIAMOND ST
OCT 711532
J
1
RCL 53-5119
ANAHEIM UNION
HICH SCHOOL DISTRICT
RCL53 -5119
TLUP2001-06374
rcuP ZOOo-oazl6
ART D11]
ST. THOMAS KOREAN
CATHOLIC CENTER
q
RM-3 w
GU
P3338
100 EACH GH
i
_
OFFICE
RM-0
p -
��-
RCL6 &70.01
PEARL STREET
VAR 2100
p C
VAR 2652
C -G
CNIDI
115 DU
RCL2006U01]6
RCL 89- -9042
RCL 6364J0
iGU EACH 3GU iGU EACH
U T9
CUP914
U
CUP4]0
RM3
VAR3082
RM
VAR 1873 S
RMd
ARTS.
VAR 174]S
VAR 17245
RCL 63E4-30 ?M'
VARY ARARTMENTS
4T U
— APARTMENTS CH
iDU � 2]00
D S i
40 DU
TL RMd
RIA4
f j� DIAMOND ST
OCT 711532
J
s
VAR2700
ARTS
R M-0
RM-0 If RMd —�
]]DU
�� APARTMENTS o
w
iGU EACH' 5
O
446 VAR 3836 1800
a
>
Q
HYRApRPok6"A'
aQ
16 ou
�
R�ENUE
z
WILSHI�
0
w
I TL C
v c�
1
�-.p
y
s A s o
VACANT
I s l P I s"!�
vrc
AVENUE CUP3
LINCOLN
Reclassification No. 2006 -00176
Requested By: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: Graphic
Q.S. No. 38, 46, 62
=z
Date ofAerial Photo:
Ju IV 2005
Reclassification No. 2006 -00176
Requested By: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
ED Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: Graphic
Q.S. No. 38, 46, 62
10032
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 8
8a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION
8b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2006 -00176
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(Motion)
(Resolution)
(1) Parcel A: This irregularly- shaped 1.3 -acre parcel is located west of the terminus of
Glenoaks Avenue at the intersection of Greenleaf Avenue and Glenoaks Avenue, with a
frontage of 436 feet on the west side of Greenleaf Avenue (no address).
Parcel B: This irregularly- shaped 2.6 -acre parcel is located south of the terminus of
Chippewa Avenue at the intersection of Crescent Avenue and Chippewa Avenue, with a
frontage of 413 feet on the south side of Crescent Avenue (no address).
Parcel C: This irregularly- shaped 0.84 -acre parcel is located at the northeast corner of
Wilshire Avenue and Pearl Street, with frontages of 110 feet on the east side of Pearl
Street and 446 feet on the north side of Wilshire Avenue (no address).
REQUEST:
(2) This is a City- initiated (Community Development Department) request for approval of
reclassification of these properties as follows to allow for the future construction of three
affordable housing projects:
(a) Parcel A — from the RM -3 (Multiple - Family Residential) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple -
Family Residential) zone or less intense zone.
(b) Parcel B —from the RS -3 (Single - Family Residential) zone to the RM -3 (Multiple -
Family Residential) zone or less intense zone.
(c) Parcel C - from the C -G (General Commercial) zone to the RM-4 (Multiple - Family
Residential) zone or less intense zone-
BACKGROUND
(3) These properties are currently vacant. The existing zoning and General Plan land use
designations are as follows:
Parcel
Existing Zoning
General Plan
A
RE
Medium Density Residential
B
RS7
Low - Medium Density Residential
C
C -G
Medium Density Residential
DISCUSSION:
(4) This reclassification request to rezone the subject properties from the RM -3, RS -3, and C -G
zones to the RM-4, RM -3, and RM-4 zones respectively, would be consistent with the Low -
Medium Density and Medium Density Residential land designations for these properties.
This reclassification would permit planned developments consisting of apartment
complexes on each parcel consistent with applicable development standards and State
Density Bonus Law. This reclassification request would also be compatible with the
surrounding multiple - family and single - family zoning and land uses.
SR- RCL2006- 00176ds
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 8
(5) The attached memorandum from the Community Development Department dated April 18,
2006, indicates a reclassification is being requested to allow the development of
"affordable" multiple - family residential housing projects on remnant parcels from the 1 -5
Freeway widening project. The development of these three sites would provide
approximately 143 units of affordable rental housing. The Redevelopment Agency is
currently in the process of approving an Affordability Housing Agreement with a housing
developer. Under the terms of the agreement, the developer would enter into a long term
ground lease and develop affordable rental units on each site.
(6) The requested reclassification would facilitate the replacement of vacant blighted properties
with new residential developments in areas containing other residential uses. The
Redevelopment Agency has invested in new infrastructure, new housing developments,
historic preservation projects, and urban office and commercial developments citywide.
Parcels A and B are designated as Housing Opportunity sites (Parcel C is not designated
as a housing opportunity site) in the City's adopted Housing Element; thus, the proposed
RM -3 and RM -4 zoning classifications for these areas would also supplement and support
City programs identified in Anaheim's Housing Element. Community Development
Department staff has been working closely with the developers on specific site design
issues and architectural plans which would be presented to the Commission at a later
public hearing.
(7) The requested reclassification is being processed under the City's new Affordable Housing
Strategic Plan. The Plan seeks to expand the supply of rental housing affordable to very
low, low, and moderate - income households. The Plan identifies several incentives to be
explored to encourage the development of new units. One of these incentives is expediting
the review of applications for discretionary entitlements and plan check. The processing of
this reclassification ahead of the development plans would expedite the entitlement
processing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ANALYSIS:
(8) Staff has reviewed the proposal and the Initial Study (a copy of which is available for review
in the Planning Department). Based on City staff review of the proposed project, staff
recommends that a Negative Declaration be approved upon a finding by the Commission
that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency; and that it has
considered the proposed Negative Declaration together with any comments received during
the public review process and further finding on the basis of the Initial Study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment-
RECOMMENDATION
( Staff recommends that, unless additional or contrary information is received during the
meeting, and based upon the evidence submitted to the Commission, including the
evidence presented in this staff report, and oral and written evidence presented at the
public hearing, the Planning Commission take the following actions:
(a) By motion, approve a Negative Declaration for the project.
(b) By resolution, approve Reclassification No. 2006 -00176 to reclassify the subject
properties by adopting the attached resolution including the findings and conditions
contained therein.
Page 2
[DRAFT]
RESOLUTION NO. PC2006 - * **
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2006 -00176 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for
Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as follows:
PARCEL A: THAT PORTION OF LOT 2 OF TRACT NO. 5495, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP
RECORDED IN BOOK 205, PAGES 24, TO 29 INCLUSIVE, OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN
THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, LYING NORTHEASTERLY
OF THE FOLLOWING DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF HOLLY STREET AND CATALPA
AVENUE, AS SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 1802 RECORDED IN BOOK 56, PAGES 27 TO 29
INCLUSIVE OF SAID MISCELLANEOUS MAPS; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF
SAID CATALPA AVENUE NORTH 89 20'29" WEST, 151.09 FEET, TO THE TRUE POINT OF
BEGINNING OF THIS DESCRIPTION; THENCE LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE. SOUTH 44
17' 02" EAST, 19325 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A TANGENT CURVE CONCAVE
NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1340.00 FEET; THENCE SOUTHEASTERLY
17221 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 7 21' 49 "; THENCE
SOUTH 51 38'51" EAST, 148.50 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 48 02'33" EAST, 207.80 FEET TO
A POINT ON THE WESTERLY RIGHT OF WAY LINE OF GREENLEAF AVENUE, AS SHOWN
ON TRACT NO. 4621, RECORDED IN BOOK 190, PAGES 22 TO 24 INCLUSIVE, OF SAID
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS; SAID POINT BEING ON A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY
HAVING A RADIUS OF 358.35 FEET AND DISTANT 140.36 FEET MEASURED ALONG SAID
CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE 22 26'30" FROM THE SOUTHEASTERLY
TERMINUS OF SAID CURVE.
THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTIONS ARE ON THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1927, ZONE 6. MULTIPLY ALL DISTANCES USED
IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION BY 1.0000121 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES.
THERE SHALL BE NO ABUTTER'S RIGHTS OF ACCESS APPURTENANT TO THE ABOVE
DESCRIBED REAL PROPERTY IN AND TO THE ADJACENT STATE FREEWAY.
PARCEL B: THAT PORTION OF THE NORTH HALF OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER
OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 8, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST,
IN THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE,
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY. DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF CRESCENT AVENUE AND
CHIPPEWA AVENUE (FORMERLY CHIPPEWA STREET) AS SAID INTERSECTION IS
SHOWN ON TRACT NO. 3095, AS PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 122, PAGES 24 AND 25
OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID CRESCENT AVENUE NORTH 89
05'56" WEST 244.57 FEET; THENCE SOUTH 56 07'55" EAST 95.56 FEET TO A POINT ON
THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THAT CERTAIN ROAD EASEMENT AS DESCRIBED IN THE
EASEMENT DEED RECORDED JULY 26, 1972 N BOOK 10242, PAGE 943 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS, SAID POINT BEING THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE CONTINUING
SOUTH 56 07'55" EAST 689.98 FEET TO A POINT ON THE WESTERLY LINE OF TRACT
NO. 1591 RECORDED IN BOOK 54 PAGES 36 THROUGH 39, INCLUSIVE OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID
CR \PC2006 -0 -1- PC2006-
COUNTY.
THENCE ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE NORTH 00 26' 45" EAST 397.47 FEET; TO A
POINT ON A LINE PARALLEL WITH AND DISTANT 30.00 FEET SOUTHERLY OF, SAID
CRESCENT AVENUE; THENCE NORTH 89 05'56" WEST 41622 FEET TO THE EASTERLY
CORNER OF SAID ROAD EASEMENT DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 10242, PAGE 943 OF
OFFICIAL RECORDS; THENCE ALONG THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF SAID ROAD EASEMENT
SOUTH 81 26'36" WEST 133.82 FEET; THENCE NORTH 89 05'56" WEST 27.51 FEET TO
THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
EXCEPTING THEREFROM THAT PORTION LYING NORTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED LINE:
COMMENCING AT THE INTERSECTION OF SAID CRESCENT AVENUE AND CHIPPEWA
AVENUE (FORMERLY CHIPPEWA STREET); THENCE ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF SAID
CRESCENT AVENUE SOUTH 89 05' 56" EAST 114.57 FEET; THENCE PERPENDICULAR
TO SAID CENTERLINE SOUTH 00 54' 04" WEST 30.00 FEET TO A POINT ON THE
SOUTHERLY LINE OF CRESCENT AVENUE; SAID POINT BEING THE POINT OF
BEGINNING; SAID POINT ALSO BEING THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE TANGENT TO SAID
SOUTHERLY LINE, CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 112.00 FEET;
THENCE WESTERLY 2002 . FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF
10 14' 31 "; THENCE SOUTH 80 39' 33" WEST 55.09 FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A
CURVE CONCAVE NORTHEASTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 74.00 FEET, THENCE
WESTERLY, NORTHWESTERLY AND NORTHERLY 141.88 FEET ALONG SAID CURVE
THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF 109 51' 19 ", THENCE NORTH 10 30' 52" EAST 64.18
FEET TO THE BEGINNING OF A CURVE CONCAVE WESTERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS
OF 112.00 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY 2001 . FEET ALONG SAID CURVE THROUGH A
CENTRAL ANGLE OF 10 14' 16" TO A POINT OF TANGENCY WITH A LINE PARALLEL
WITH AND DISTANT WESTERLY 3200 . FEET, FROM THE CENTERLINE OF SAID
CHIPPEWA AVENUE (FORMERLY CHIPPEWA STREET.)
PARCEL C: ALL THAT CERTAIN EXCESS LAND, BEING STATE PARCEL 200363 -6, IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS DESCRIBED
IN THAT FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION, CASE NO. 758 -080, RECORDED JANUARY
25, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19990051564, OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF
THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THOSE PORTIONS OF
LOTS 8, 9 AND 10 OF TRACT NO. 10669, PER MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 459, PAGES 46
AND 47 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS ON FILE IN SAID OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER, LYING SOUTHWESTERLY AND SOUTHERLY OF THE FOLLOWING
DESCRIBED LINE: BEGINNING AT THE SOUTHERLY TERMINUS OF COURSE "5" AS
DESCRIBED IN STATE PARCEL 200363 -1 IN SAID FINAL ORDER OF CONDEMNATION
BEING A POINT OF COMPOUND CURVATURE WITH CURVES CONCAVE
SOUTHWESTERLY HAVING RADII OF 110.00 FEET AND 50.00, A RADIAL BEARING OF
SAID CURVES BEARS NORTH 77 02'38" EAST; THENCE NORTHWESTERLY ALONG SAID
COURSE "5" ANTI SAID 110.00 FEET RADIUS CURVE 16225 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 84 30'35" TO THE NORTHWESTERLY TERMINUS OF SAD CURVE, A RADIAL
LINE TO SAID POINT BEARS NORTH 07 27' 57" WEST; THENCE TANGENT TO SAID
CURVE SOUTH 82 32'03" WEST 194.35 FEET TO THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID LOT 8
AND THE TERMINUS OF THIS LINE DESCRIPTION.
THE BEARINGS AND DISTANCES USED IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION ARE ON THE
CALIFORNIA COORDINATE SYSTEM OF 1927, ZONE 6, MULTIPLY ALL DISTANCES USED
IN THE ABOVE DESCRIPTION BY 1.00002052 TO OBTAIN GROUND LEVEL DISTANCES-
-2- PC2006-
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of
Anaheim on May 1, 2006, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law
and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 "Procedures ", to hear and
consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts
1 - That the applicant proposes reclassification of Parcel A —from the RM -3 (Multiple - Family
Residential) zone to the RM -4 (Multiple - Family Residential) zone or less intense zone, Parcel B — from the RS-
3 (Single - Family Residential) zone to the RM -3 (Multiple - Family Residential) zone or less intense zone, and
Parcel C - from the C -G (General Commercial) zone to the RM -4 (Multiple - Family Residential) zone.
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates Parcels A and C for Medium Density Residential
land uses, and Parcel B for Low - Medium Density Residential land uses and the proposed reclassification would
implement the appropriate zone classification for each of the parcels consistent with the respective General Plan
designations.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the
orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification would supplement and support City programs identified in
Anaheim's Housing Element and allow for development of new housing units on housing opportunity sites.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties properly relates to the zones and their
permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted
uses generally established throughout the community.
6. That * ** indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal to reclassify: Parcel A from the RM -3 (Multiple - Family, Residential)
zone to the RM-4 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone; Parcel B from the RS -3 (Single - Family, Residential) zone
to the RM -3 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone; and Parcel C from the C -G (General Commercial) zone to the
RM-4 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone, to allow for the future construction of three affordable housing
projects; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the
independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any
comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the
environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to exclude Parcel A from the RM -3 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-4 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone; to exclude Parcel B from the RS -3 (Single -
Family, Residential) zone and to incorporate said described property into the RM -3 (Multiple - Family,
Residential) zone; and to exclude Parcel C from the C -G (General Commercial) zone and to incorporate said
described property into the RM-4 (Multiple - Family, Residential) zone, unconditionally.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City
Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole
discretion-
-3- PC2006-
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 1, 2006. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 "Procedures" of the
Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in
the event of an appeal.
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
I_ \1111Ix.9i
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission held on
May 1, 2006, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
VACANT: COMMISSIONERS:
2006.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this day of
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
-4- PC2006-
Attachment - Item No. 8
�&
0
o� o
� a
F� Z
FO �N D E_O bM1
City of Anaheim
COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT
To: Dave See, Senior Planner
From: Abel Avalos, Project Manager
Date: April 18, 2006
P
S.
RE: Jamboree Housing Development: Certification of Affordability
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency ") staff has been working with
Jamboree Housing ( "Jamboree ") to develop a site plan for the properties
located at W. Glenoaks Ave. and W. Greenleaf Ave. (APN 272- 081 -05 and
272 - 081 -04), W. Crescent Ave. and Chippewa St. (APN 072 - 091 -03), and
1371 W. Wilshire Ave. and 1232 W. Diamond St. (APN 255- 022 -51). The
properties are remnant parcels from the I -5 widening project and were included
in the recent multi - family request for proposals. As proposed, the development
of these sites would provide approximately 143 units of affordable rental
housing.
Staff is in the process of approving an Affordable Housing Agreement between
the Agency and Jamboree. Under the terms of the Agreement, Jamboree
would enter into a long -term ground lease and develop affordable rental units
on each site. All of the rental units would be required to be affordable and
leased to income qualified households. Affordability levels would be based on
the applicable Orange County income guidelines.
Jamboree's obligation under the Agreement is to obtain all necessary
entitlements and financing, construct the units, and carry out the marketing and
management responsibilities. Jamboree will also offer preference to Anaheim
residents and persons employed in Anaheim to qualify for units prior to a
general public release.
If you have any questions, or need additional information, please call me at
(714) 765 -5238.
famWree Certification ofARor bili[y v.2.DOC
Item No- 9
RS-2
x LL w U
C) D
GRAMERCY AVE
RS
UU
GLENCREST AVE
RM-2
RCL 78 -79 -40
VAR 3098
VAR 906 S
CONDOS
44 DU
RM-4
CL 66 -67 -59
VAR 2013
VAR 1871
ADULT LIVING
124 DU
RCL 89 -90 -51
RM-4
RCL 86 -87 -25
VAR 3645
APARTMENTS
21 DU
RM -4
VIVA ADULT LIVING
BAYLOR CIRCLE
RM -4
VIVA ADULT LIVING
Conditional Use Permit No- 2003 -04685
TRACKING NO- CUP2006 -05078
Requested By: JOSEPH KARAKI
590 North Magnolia Avenue
RCL 59 -60 -107
CUP 3323
CUP 2302
CUP 2234
CUP 2229
CUP 1254
CUP 888
VAR 2411
MAGNOLIA
CRESCENT
SHOPPING
CENTER
10034
U)
x �
w RS
1 DU EACH O
V
Q
2
CRESCENT A
AVENUE
222' -►
C -G
LLI - R
RCL 64 -65 -03
Z T
RCL 59-60 -107
Q
Q
J
Z
Q C
C -G
RCL 63 -
U)
U) V)
U) F-
> O
O U
Q Q
~ N U VAR 974
�CL 62 -63 -80 w
O CUP 377 0!
<VAR 1632
w VAR 1598
L)
L)
i�
PR N
Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Q -S- No- 26
~ N U VAR 974
�CL 62 -63 -80 w
O CUP 377 0!
<VAR 1632
w VAR 1598
L)
L)
i�
PR N
Subject Property
Date: May 1, 2006
Scale: 1"=200'
Q -S- No- 26
Staff Report to the
Planning Commission
May 1, 2006
Item No. 9
9a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY - APPROVED) (Motion for continuance)
9b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003 -04685
(Tracking No. CUP2006- 05078)
SITE LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION:
(1) This rectangularly- shaped 0.80 -acre property is located at the southeast corner of
Magnolia and Crescent Avenues having frontages of 145 feet on the east side of Magnolia
Avenue and 222 feet on the south side of Crescent Avenue (590 North Magnolia Avenue).
REQUEST:
(2) The applicant requests to modify exhibits and amend or delete conditions of approval to
modify a previously- approved automobile car wash facility with accessory fast food
restaurant and accessory retail sales, to permit a self serve car wash facility under the
authority of Code Sections 18.08.030.040 and 18.60.190.030.
BACKGROUND
(3) This property is vacant and is zoned C -G (General Commercial). The Anaheim General
Plan designates this property and property to the south for Corridor Residential land uses.
Properties to the north and east are designated for Low Density Residential land uses and
properties to the west are designated for Medium Density Residential land uses.
(4) The applicant, Joseph Karaki, has submitted the attached letter dated April 21, 2006,
requesting a continuance to the May 15, 2006, Commission meeting, in order to complete
revisions to the plans and allow staff time to advertise a waiver for minimum landscaped
setback.
PREVIOUS ZONING ACTIONS:
(5) Conditional Use Permit No. 2003 -04685 (to construct an automobile car wash facility with
accessory fast food restaurant and accessory retail sales, to permit a self serve car wash
facility) was approved by the Planning Commission on May 19, 2003.
RECOMMENDATION:
(6) That the Commission, by motion, continue this item to the May 15, 2006, Planning
Commission meeting.
Sr- cup2003- 04685(cont 050106)jpr_sr_pc050106
Page 1
F-AU .71TiM, MIMIllf\NW]
From: joseph [mailto:jkaraki @wsecinc.com]
Sent: Friday, April 21, 2006 4:37 PM
To: James Ramirez
Subject: Continuance
Hello John,
I would like to request a continuance for the carwash project located at 590 S. Magnolia Ave.,
until May 15th.
Regards,
Joseph Karaki
President
Western States
Engineering, Inc.
(714) 695 -9300
(714) 693 -1002 fax