Loading...
2013/10/22ANAHEIM CITY COUNCIL SPECIAL MEETING OF OCTOBER 22, 2013 AND REGULAR MEETING OF OCTOBER 22, 2073 The special meeting of October 22, 2013 was called to order at 2:36 P.M. in the chambers of Anaheim City Hall. The meeting notice, agenda, and related materials were duly posted on October 18, 2013. PRESENT: Mayor Tom Tait and Council Members: Jordan Brandman, Gail Eastman, Lucille Kring and Kris Murray. STAFF PRESENT: City Manager Marcie Edwards, City Attorney Michael Houston, and City Clerk Linda Andal. WORKSHOP — PLATINUM TRIANGLE PARKS IMPROVEMENTS Terry Lowe, Director of Community Services, indicated his report would offer an overview of how the department planned for the recreational needs of Anaheim residents and with council's direction, would convert those years of planning into project development and improvements to the park system, specifically, and adjacent to the Platinum Triangle. He stated new parks and new amenities in existing parks were funded through park development fees from new residential projects built in the City, per the Quimby Act. He added that Anaheim adopted its own version of the Quimby Act in the Municipal Code which required, as a condition of approval for a subdivision, the dedication of land, payment of a fee in lieu of dedication, or a combination of both to address park and recreational purposes. These fees, he remarked, augmented the department's aggressive pursuit of grant funding for new restrooms, upgraded playgrounds and other amenities to existing parks. For the Platinum Triangle, he noted, those park development fees were placed into two general categories; i.e., fees received from housing development within the Triangle and fees received from development outside of the Platinum Triangle with those fees divided into three zones: West, Central and East. He pointed out the Quimby Act specified that park fees received must be spent on improvements in the area in which the fees were received. In addition, the amount and location of land to be dedicated or fees to be paid required a reasonable relationship to the use of the park and recreational facilities by future residents of the subdivision that generated those fees. Also, he pointed out, Quimby Act funds could not be used for staffing, operations, maintenance, or to purchase materials and supplies or replacement of maintenance equipment. Mr. Lowe reported the Environmental Impact Report for the development of the Platinum Triangle also earmarked those fees and limited dedication of park land received from the residential construction to be used for park amenities in the Platinum Triangle while also addressing the impact on three parks located just outside of the Triangle's boundaries: Ponderosa, Juarez and Boysen Parks. He informed council that the City Attorney's legal opinion interpreted that statement to mean park fees from housing developments inside of the Platinum Triangle could be used to upgrade the facilities in the those three parks, as well as the development and purchase of new recreational sites in the Platinum Triangle's "sphere of influence" just outside of the area's boundaries. Since the City began receiving park development fees from the Platinum Triangle in 2005, Mr. Lowe remarked, approximately $16.1 million had been collected. To date, $12.7 million had been spent on land acquisition: $3.1 million for the Anaheim Way site, $6.4 million for the City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 2 of 20 construction of Anaheim Coves to be fully reimbursed from the State and various park improvements, and facility design services for future projects. He added the Anaheim Way site had since been considered unsuitable for park development due to recent changes in the law regarding its proximity to the 5 freeway and it was recommended that the site be sold, emphasizing that the land had more than doubled in value since its purchase. Mr. Lowe provided details on the Park Fund activity for the next three years with a beginning balance of $8.4 million, adding that a more in depth recommendation concerning the distribution of these funds would be given at the end of his presentation. He indicated the Planning Department had estimated that $8.8 million in park fees were to be collected in FY 13/14 and $8.1 million in FY 14/15 while projected expenditures included $6.4 million that had been placed in a miscellaneous account pending further review and direction from council on the Anaheim Tennis Center Project. He stated those funds required appropriation to a specific project as mandated by the Quimby Act. As the City's population increased, Mr. Lowe emphasized the need for additional parkland had grown as well. The national standard for park acreage was 6.25 to 10.5 acres of developed park land per 1,000 population, the Quimby Act specified 3.5 acres per 1,000 and Anaheim, he pointed out, was currently at approximately 1.9 acres per 1,000. The park system ranged from small mini -parks such as Cottonwood, neighborhood parks like George Washington and Stoddard, and the larger community parks such as Boysen and Peralta Canyon. In addition, there were special use parks such as Anaheim Coves and the Oak Canyon Nature Center. He noted with the success of the park system and its popularity, there were challenges; and due to over 100,000 hours of field use this year, staff had turned away 17 percent of requests. He emphasized there was a real need for large turf areas for sporting events such as scheduled league play and unorganized "pick -up" play. He added that although accommodating the youth and adult leagues and providing general play space resulted in heavy turf damage due to over- use, the demand for use made it impossible to close fields for recovery. For this reason, he stated, staff had been actively seeking vacant, available land throughout the city to develop into a sports complex capable of holding large organized sporting events and taking some of the pressure off fields. As of yet, no suitable location had been identified. Mr. Lowe indicated staff regularly evaluated all neighborhoods and park needs with planned park improvement projects prioritized according to the greatest need. As an example, over the past decade, the City's budget and CIP had been focused on planning and designing for facilities and parks within those most distressed neighborhoods, whenever possible; i.e. Walnut Grove Park in 2001, George Washington Park in 2002, Energy Field in 2008, Colony Park in 2010, and the most recently completed Anaheim Coves project in east Anaheim. PLATINUM TRIANGLE DEVELOPMENT FEE - ELIGIBLE PARK PROJECTS PONDEROSA PARK - Originally constructed in 1965, the 9 -acre park was an important public facility heavily used by the surrounding neighborhood with the Family Resource Center, an anchor in the Haster/O rang ewood neighborhood for over 25 years. Limited by its small size and antiquated amenities, in 2011, as part of a grant application process, several community meetings were held to get input on a master plan redesign of the entire park. It included a new family resource center and gymnasium as a high priority for residents and last July, Council approved an agreement to develop the final design of the complex. Mr. Lowe indicated the project should be completed in the spring of 2015 and was estimated at a cost of $7 million. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 3 of 20 BOYSEN PARK - Mr. Lowe reported this was a 25 -acre community park and home of the Anaheim Tennis Center, with three Class A baseball fields, multiple Little League fields, and two tot -lot playgrounds near Theodore Roosevelt Elementary School, and was the closest community park to the Platinum Triangle. The playground equipment needed replacement per State standards and the Anaheim Tennis Center had no improvements made to it since it opened in 1977. Due to the regional importance of the park and the opportunities for improvement, staff recommended a master plan process for the eventual redesign of the balance of the park's configuration and amenities. He added school district officials alerted staff to the planned renovation of the school which would occur within the next 2 -3 years which meant the renovation could include a property reconfiguration of the school and park similar to that recently done for Ponderosa Park to benefit both entities and the public with additional open space. Mayor Tait inquired about the proposed additional acreage with Mr. Lowe responding the Urban Forestry yard was being held by the Successor Agency because it was part of the Redevelopment Agency and staff was hopeful that the parcel would be submitted to the State as a transfer to the City for public use at a possible no cost for land or in the worst case scenario, at market value. He indicated the preliminary estimate for the master plan design and construction was $5 to $7 million. Regarding the City- owned, concessionaire - operated Anaheim Tennis Center which was located in the former Henry Wagner House at Boysen Park, Mr. Lowe indicated this circa 1921 Mediterranean Revival Style house was converted into the Anaheim Tennis Center in 1977. At that time, the tennis courts were built and improvements were made to the house for public use. In 2007, a new concessionaire was retained to operate the Tennis Center, Mike Nelson's Orange County Tennis Academy Inc., with a lease running from 2007 for a term of 20 years with an option to renew for two additional five -year periods. He added the Lease included the historic Wagner House, auxiliary buildings, tennis courts and all other improvements on approximately four acres. In addition, the Lease required the Tennis Academy to invest a minimum of $125,000 toward accomplishing the Tennis Center's planned modernization project and to date, he remarked, the Academy had invested $200,000 in capital improvements. The Lease also required the Tennis Academy to provide services that were affordable to the community, including both adult and junior programming, and to focus service delivery on Anaheim and surrounding cities in Orange County. Other stipulations included allowing the city use of the Clubhouse up to 15 times per year. The City's obligations in the Lease included paying for: the complete rehabilitation /reconstruction of the Wagner House and auxiliary buildings, landscaping, sidewalks, cleaning of drains, parking lot improvements, signage, and major systems including plumbing and electrical, fixtures and furniture for the Wagner House and the auxiliary buildings, alternate trailers for restrooms, member /guest check -in, and office space for staff during the modernization of the facilities. He added there were no further detailed descriptions of specific improvements, dollar amounts or timelines associated with the above listed City obligations; however, the Lease did reference the Tennis Center's future modernization project developed as a result of a public input and City's review relative to the design and layout of the premises. In 2009 city staff, with assistance of a historic architectural consultant, began the process for a redesign of the Tennis Center. Several community meetings were held and comprehensive input solicited from residents from surrounding neighborhoods, members from the City's historic community and the tennis community. Following the input and design process, construction plans were completed for the project. In addition to the improvements required by the agreement and based on community input and council direction, the plan also included a City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 4 of 20 championship center court with tiered seating and a 1,600 square foot, historically - themed outdoor garden to service expanded usage for the hosting of tournaments, social gatherings and special events. Mr. Lowe stated it was believed those amenities would maximize the revenue potential of this enterprise operation and reduce the department's dependency on the General Fund. The construction estimate for the total shelf -ready project was $6.4 million. FIVE COVES - Staff was currently working with Orange County Water District (OCWD) on the development of trail amenities along the west side of the Santa Ana River, north of Lincoln Avenue and south of Fonterra Street in an area referred to as Five Coves. The project would be similar to the recently completed Anaheim Coves Park with pedestrian trails, interpretative signage, and landscaping. The estimated cost was $1.7 million and was eligible for State grant funding with staff in the grant application process at this time. If not successful, the project could be funded with Platinum Triangle park development fees, however, Mr. Lowe anticipated the grant would be awarded. JUAREZ PARK - Juarez Park was a 9.5 acre neighborhood park, home of the Sunkist Branch Library. This park would benefit from a redesign and reconfiguration which would more efficiently use existing land for new amenities and additional open space. The tot lot playground and restroom were in need of renovation, and significant drainage and irrigation deficiencies at the site need to be corrected. The preliminary estimate for the master plan design and complete reconstruction was $5 million. GATEWAY PARK - Staff was currently working on conceptual plans for a small park located on the south -east corner of State College and Cerritos Avenue. Gateway Park was located on land owned by Southern California Edison (SCE) and was secured by staff at no cost as part of the Franchise Agreement between the City and SCE which required parcels of land to be set aside for recreational purposes. While small in size, the property was in a key location both from a visual standpoint as a gateway into the Platinum Triangle on State College, as well as a needed amenity for residents living in the project area. Planned amenities were a small turf area, shade structures, and a number of basketball courts. Design and construction were estimated to be approximately $1 million and there were no land costs. BALL ROAD BASIN — Mr. Lowe reported the City expressed its desire to the OCWD to purchase the parcel known as the Ball Road Basin, which was currently zoned as open space and no longer suitable for its intended percolation function. The property located on the west side of the Santa Ana River on Ball Road just south of Anaheim Coves, was approximately 20 acres in size. If the purchase was successful, it could provide the City with a sports complex unlike any other in the system capable of holding large organized sporting events. It could also be utilized to rotate user groups to this site in order for staff to renovate fields throughout the city while not interrupting game schedules for extended periods. He added that it could further provide an alternative for adults to use for soccer at night rather than the current practice of late night play under security lights at various parks disturbing neighbors, violating the law, and further stressing the turf. Community meetings were held in 2012 as part of a grant application process for a potential park site near Cerritos and State College that ultimately sold before the city had secured sufficient funding to make an offer. Throughout this process, sports field user groups and other residents confirmed the need for a large sports complex within the City specifically oriented for soccer. For these reasons, he stated, staff was committed to aggressively seek available land which could be purchased and developed with Platinum Triangle Park Development fees as the City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 5 of 20 funding source. The Ball Road Basin development could include multiple lighted sports fields (with synthetic turf to allow increased play), restrooms, concession and team room buildings, and a "feature" stadium that could be used for larger events. And he pointed out; staff was pursuing options through continued discussions with the District and would report back to the council on the progress. Mr. Lowe remarked the Library Division also received development fees from new residential construction and was projected to receive over three million dollars from the Platinum Triangle at a rate of $487 per unit built. To date, the Library received approximately $270,400.00; a total of $116,435.00 was expended on the Ponderosa Joint City /School Library project, resulting in the current balance of $153,965.00. A number of options had been discussed concerning how future library development fees would be expended; and one option was to develop a small storefront library in the A Town development along Market Street and another was to expand the Sunkist Branch at Juarez Park. Mr. Lowe stated staff would develop recommendations when the ultimate density and phasing of the project was determined as well as how much money would be available. In summary, he remarked, Platinum Triangle park development fees would fund new recreational amenities and the upgrading of existing nearby parks. Both options would benefit the residents of Anaheim and help mitigate the increased usage of park facilities that would result from the influx of residents living in the new developments of this project area. As the economy continued to improve and development in the Platinum Triangle accelerated, so would the revenue stream for park development fees; however, he pointed out, due to the constraints placed on the funding, the geographical usage restrictions and the requirement to commit the funds within five years, it was necessary to commit the current funding received very soon. He indicated staff also required direction as to the funding that was expected to be received in the next few fiscal years so that planning could be done to get the projects online in time for the influx of new residents and their impact on Anaheim's park system. Ultimately, he stated, the current review of and adjustment to the density of the Platinum Triangle would determine the exact amount of available funding for new park construction and existing park renovation. He noted City staff from several departments were also working closely with the project developer, Lennar, on this issue and once the assessment was completed, staff would have a better feel for the amounts of funding available followed by recommendations as to those these future funds should be expended. Staff recommended that, with the current funding now and anticipated revenues for the next two years, the following projects should be prioritized as follows: 1) Planning and renovation of Ponderosa Park, Gymnasium and Family Resource Center; 2) Aggressively solicit outside funding for the Five Coves project; 3) Conduct the planning and final design of the Gateway Property with the initial goal of SCE approval for development sometime in the future; 4) Move forward with the RFP for the renovation of the Anaheim Tennis Center, as originally designed; 5) Work closely with the OCWD concerning the purchase and development of the Ball Road Basin as a sports park; 6) Initiate the master planning process for Boysen Park in conjunction with the planned rebuilding of Roosevelt School; City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 6 of 20 7) Initiate the master planning process for Juarez Park. Council Member Kring expressed full support of the presentation. Council Member Murray stressed the importance of working with residents to resolve any concerns they may have, in advance of any project. She was also encouraged to hear that discussions with the school district were occurring in connection with Boysen Park as a way to maximize land and resources and asked how the department planned to communicate to the neighborhoods as well as citywide about these future projects. Mr. Lowe indicated he would bring that rollout plan back to council for their information. Council Member Brandman inquired if the acreage per resident calculation took into account the city's joint agreements with the school districts with Mr. Lowe replying the Quimby Act did not give credit for those type of joint uses. Council Member Brandman was supportive of the plan asking that the department keep the expansion of La Palma Park into the Edison right -of -way in mind, similar to what was done with Maxwell Park, and suggested a future workshop be scheduled. Mr. Lowe concurred, adding that the realities were that funding sources for other parts of the city were nothing like that of the Platinum Triangle, with projections of almost $100 million in park fees estimated to year 2035. Mayor Pro Tern Eastman appreciated the update and the idea of rotating playing fields to be able to refurbish the overused turf conditions. Mayor Tait stated he would rather see funds not earmarked for the Tennis Center and used for the purchase of additional recreation property as he felt four to six small pocket parks and a three acre greenbelt area underserved the Platinum Triangle. Mr. Lowe responded by improving the historic house that was in need of renovation and was an asset of the city, that additional revenue would be generated. Mayor Tait responded that an obligation for building maintenance should not cost $6.4 million asking if there had been any analysis on what that revenue return would be once improvements were made. Mr. Lowe reported the Finance Department reviewed the findings and estimated it would take about 20 years in revenue to recover that investment at triple the revenue the city was currently receiving from the operator. Mr. Lowe also emphasized that staff had been looking at every opportunity to purchase land, adding there was a substantial amount for that purpose. He noted the elementary school district was in discussions about purchasing land in that area and asked if the city might partner with them to develop athletic fields with the limitation it could only be used during off school hours. Council Member Kring felt that partnership was of value and worthy of discussion by Mr. Lowe. Mayor Tait reiterated his direction would be to drop the tennis center project, asking if the rest of council had an opinion on that subject. Mr. Lowe reminded council that there was a contractual obligation to make certain improvements and the only optional ideas was received through the community input process, explaining the center court concept was derived from that process and added to the other obligations. He added that the restoration of the house had also been part of that same agreement with Mayor Tait requesting a copy of the contract. At 3:34 P.M. the special meeting was adjourned and the Regular City Council Meeting of October 22, 2013 was called to order. ADDITIONS /DELETIONS TO CLOSED SESSION: None PUBLIC COMMENTS ON CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: None At 3:35 P.M., Council recessed to closed session for consideration of the following items: CLOSED SESSION ITEMS: City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 7 of 20 CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code) Name of Case: Wilson v. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 2012- 00614516 2. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the Government Code) Name of Case: Travis Mock v. City of Anaheim, et al., United States District Court Case No. SACV12 -829 BRO (Ex) 3. CONFERENCE WITH LEGAL COUNSEL - EXISTING LITIGATION (Subdivision (d)(1) of Section 54956.9 of the California Government Code) Name of Case: Moreno et al. v. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 2012- 00579998 At 5:02 P.M., the city council session was reconvened. Invocation: Pastor Ed McGlasson, Stadium Vineyard Christian Fellowship Flap Salute: Council Member Jordan Brandman Presentations: Recognizing Eduardo Garcia Aguinaga from Sister City, Vitoria - Gasteiz, Spain Mr. Aguinaga remarked Anaheim's Sister City organization was very active, visiting Vitoria - Gasteiz often for the common welfare of both communities and he was appreciative of the city's welcoming remarks and looked forward to a continuing relationship. He then translated those remarks for Anaheim's Spanish speaking population. Assemblywoman Sharon Quirk - Silver, speaking on behalf of the California Assembly, presented a certificate of recognition to Senor Aguinaga, acknowledging Vito ria-G aste iz's affiliation to the city of Anaheim. Acceptance of Other Recognitions (To be presented at a later date): Proclaiming October 20 -26, 2013, as Childhood Lead Poisoning Prevention Week Proclaiming November 1, 2013, as Extra Mile Day Proclaiming October 20 -26, 2013, as National Friends of the Library Week Proclaiming November 2013, as Pancreatic Cancer Awareness Month Proclaiming October 23 - 31, 2013, as Red Ribbon Week Recognizing the Orange County Hispanic Education Endowment Fund 2013 Apple of Gold honorees Helen Carter, Friends of the Anaheim Public Library, thanked the city for recognizing their organization. Audrey Lujan, City Librarian, remarked there were two groups, Friends of the Anaheim Public Library and Friends of the Canyon Hills Library, which had graced the library with over $50,000 in donations in support of the summer reading program and a menu of other cultural events, and thanked them for everything they did during the year for Anaheim's libraries. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 8 of 20 Dr. Helene Calvet, Orange County Health Care Agency, thanked the city for recognizing an important public health issue, childhood lead poisoning. She pointed out the detrimental health effects of lead poison in the young, adding that in 2010 -2012 period, there were over 660 children in Anaheim who were found to have elevated lead levels, the second highest of any city in the county. She remarked a blood test was the only way to make a diagnosis and offered the county's case management services to assist with this problem. Jim Fisher, representing Pancreatic Cancer organization, spoke of his personal loss associated with this disease and expressed appreciation for council's support in bringing awareness of this disease to the public. Interim Police Chief Quezada accepted the Red Ribbon Week proclamation, remarking the department remained committed to helping people lead a drug free life and joined with school district partners in this cooperative preventive program. ADDITIONS /DELETIONS TO THE AGENDA Council Member Murray requested Council Members be given the opportunity to provide Council comments at the conclusion of public comments and at the end of the meeting with full council concurrence. PUBLIC COMMENTS (all aaenda items): Assemblyperson Sharon Quirk - Silva, provided an update on the "state of the state ", remarking that California's budget had been balanced for the last three years as well as this year's budget which included a critical $1.1 billion rainy day fund and a pay down of California's debt by investing $4.2 billion (including $2.1 billion in deferrals to schools). In addition, business friendly legislation was passed, AB13, which scaled down filing time for businesses looking to open their doors from 80 days to five days, a significant reduction in wait time and she pointed out, the unemployment rate had dropped from 10.6 last summer to 8.7 percent this summer. Another benefit reflected in the state's budget was a higher credit rating received from two of the credit rating agencies, saving the state $.5 billion. Other investments, she stated, were made in education to bring relief to overcrowded classrooms and adding services, such as additional library hours that were cut during the economic decline and in addition, lower class scholarships were funded reducing college tuition by 40 percent for some families. As a member of the state housing committee, Ms. Quirk -Silva looked forward to partnering with the city as the state looked for ways to help cities move forward since the dissolution of redevelopment funds. She indicated six bills she was involved with had been signed by the Governor; AB 701 brought $53 million in vehicle license fees that would help keep the sheriffs in the county and reflected a bipartisan team effort with the entire Orange County delegation working together to solve the issue of what happened between Orange County and the state of California. A13409, a transparency and accountability bill, would place all Form 700s (Conflict of Interest filings) on line available for view by the public. She added that the unrolling of the Affordable Care Act was moving forward at the state level and there would be several town halls and information being scheduled and invited the public to visit her website for more details on the 65 district. City Clerk, Linda Andal, read the decorum policy reminding the public that this portion of the meeting provided an opportunity to speak on any item within the council's jurisdiction and the public should keep in mind that Anaheim remained committed to freedom of speech while still respecting the diversity and background of everyone residing, visiting and doing business in the city. She asked that speakers refrain from making personal, threatening, abusive, slanderous or profane remarks toward any member of the council, staff or general public. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 9 of 20 E.T. Snell spoke of issues related to a past public speaker's inappropriate comments and his opposition to Item No. 16. Cecil Jordan Corcoran, Outreach Homeless Ministries, updated the community on the progress of his work. Angela Batta, La Palma Park area resident, spoke specifically to the impacts of living near an illegal encampment for the homeless and what it meant to her family and neighbors. She asked the city for help in making her neighborhood and park livable again. Wiley Drake, Congressional Prayer of Washington D.C., remarked his organization was here to help in any way and would continue to help the poor and homeless in Orange County. William Fitzgerald objected to Item No. 16 on the agenda stating its purpose was to prevent criticism of other city issues. He remarked that the Anaheim HOME organization spoke out on behalf of those afraid to speak on issues and that his comments at a previous meeting were not reflective of hateful speech. Erika Miller, Chance Theatre, announced Triassic Park, a new musical production loosely based on the film Jurassic Park and nominated for 11 Los Angeles awards. She encouraged the community to attend. Heather Myers, resident, expressed her fears in using La Palma Park and of the type of behaviors occurring by transients using a park for their home. She worked nearby at a non- profit, asking the city to address this situation. Frank Cardona remarked that he helped the underserved youth in the community with academic and education enrichment, remarking that La Palma Park was unsafe for these kids living in this homeless environment and asking for help on behalf of them and the many families who can no longer use the park. John Dunton remarked he had been observing the problems in La Palma Park and recognized the challenge in coming up with a solution, urging council to find a way to clean up the park and to address the homeless needs. Pastor Orendorff, Community of Christ Church, opposed ticketing the homeless camping overnight in city parks, stating many were struggling families forced in this situation, asking that the city come up with another solution to the homeless problem. Roussan Collins opposed Item No. 13, discussed the legalities of putting such an ordinance in place referring to a violation of human rights by citing the homeless camping in parks. Christine Condon, resident, distressed over the homeless situation in La Palma Park and its impacts to the nearby neighborhoods, asked the city to find some way to return the parks to the community to be safely used by all. Lucy Hernandez stated the neighbors near La Palma Park needed help with transients going through their trash, using alleys as bathrooms, and sleeping in their yards. Amanda Dill asked council to reconsider Item No. 13, remarking she understood on a personal level what it meant to be homeless and hoped the city would be compassionate to those who had no place to sleep. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 10 of 20 Wendy Voorheis was opposed to the ordinance against camping in city parks, remarking a few dedicated parks should be set aside for the homeless. Brenda Doherty offered her personal story on how she became homeless because of drug and alcohol use and then saved through the First Southern Baptist Church. Jeri Kelley from Grandma's House of Hope stated she was one of the homeless. Melissa Lally stated through Grandma's House of Hope, she was clean and doing well and grateful to be here. Dan Arbgast, security contractor for Anaheim, addressed his comments to Item No. 17 explaining that his recommendation was to cancel the bid for a security contractor as it was filled with redundancy, fines for violations and false alarms and that the spirit of the contract did not represent the spirit of Anaheim. He suggested a request for proposal process be used rather than the low bid process, indicating his company was up for the challenge. Kes Narbutas, Cypress Security, spoke in favor of the bid award for Item No. 17, remarking his company was the lowest responsible bidder, the largest California based security firm that provided a broad range of security throughout western United States specializing in municipalities. He stated Redondo Beach, Modesto and others selected them on the basis of an RFP, using qualifications, experience and references in addition to competitive pricing. He added that it was understandable that other vendors would like to see the process scrapped, and while his firm would be able to compete effectively in an RFP process, he asked council to support staff's recommendation and award the bid. Mayo Rivera stated he lived and worked near La Palma Park for the past 14 years sharing that every year the situation at La Palma Park has gotten worse and he has had to call the police a few times to address violence. Jennifer Lee - Anderson, Poverty Task Force, opposed Item No. 13, stating the only way to end homelessness was to create more permanent housing. She and other members of the task force looked forward to working with the city on that solution, asking council to reject the ordinance as it was a more expensive. Emilee Sharp, Colony District, remarked that a resolution to help the homeless must be found. She encouraged council to move forward with a ban on camping in any city park. She promoted a program in Seattle in which various congregations in the area take the homeless for one month at a time, feeding, ministering, providing medical and dental help and resources to find housing. This immediately reduced the stress levels of those who were homeless with paid professionals who stayed the night at the shelter 24/7. She noted the average stay was three months with a 60 percent success rate and the funding was between $150,000 to $200,000 to run the program. She hoped the city would consider this program in which everyone contributed and did their part. Martha Vasquez remarked she had a home in Central Street which she lost through a foreclosure two years ago and had been homeless since that time and right now lived in a shelter. She was a citizen, paid taxes, and worked as a care giver, going to work every day, but did not make enough money to have the first and last month's rent plus a deposit and was unable to find a place to live on her own. She hoped council could come up with a solution. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 11 of 20 Richard Bauarschi opposed Item No. 13, remarking he managed a homeless program helping people find shelters, accommodations, food and clothing. He indicated 30 percent were veterans suffering from PTS, 15 percent had fallen on hard times and 10 -15 percent had mental issues, with the remainder having a variety of situations that required help. He did not feel this ordinance offered a solution and wondered if the parking lot behind the Salvation Army between Lemon and Harbor could be considered as a temporary location for the homeless. Dorothy Rose, Orange County Symphony, reported that 1300 students were now enrolled in a 14- school pilot project using donated instruments or in some cases parents renting instruments in order for their children to play, even though 85 percent of the students were impoverished. She added that the students and their families were also invited to attend the Symphony concerts at no cost. Ms. Rose ended her statements explaining that each concert cost $5000 to put on and ended up $3500 in the red, asking the community and the city to help support this cultural effort. Victor La Fontaine, resident, endorsed the no camping ordinance stating that parks should be used for pleasure and exercise, not for temporary housing for the homeless. He explained that the parks were now unsanitary, unsafe and unwelcoming, which should not have been allowed to happen. He urged council to pass the ordinance Brian Chuchua asked why the city attorney's budget ran over by $725,000 and required a budget increase by that amount. Ron Bengochea strongly encouraged council to go forward with the no camping ordinance in parks, remarking it was time to end the problems associated with the homeless living in the park. Manual Rios opposed Item No. 13, the no camping ordinance, remarking the homeless needed compassion and hope. German Santos addressed his complaints to Orange County District Attorney Tony Rackauckas on a matter of public interest. Tad Garabidian, Barton Security Services, recommended council reject the bid award for Item No. 17 and conduct a thorough security assessment before putting it out for a Request for Proposal rather than a low bid process. David Patterson remarked that Item No. 13 would not resolve the homeless issue and that it furthered the cycle of poverty and the real issue was in finding shelter so people could safely sleep, a basic human need. Eric Anderson, resident, encouraged the city to move forward with approval of Item No. 13, remarking there were so many negatives coming out of this encampment and other positive approaches should be used to find a real solution. Donna Acevedo, resident, stated the Anaheim Coalition for Police Oversight was a group of private citizens not affiliated with the city and offered recommendations and a letter to the City Manager to implement a resident investigative review board to address the 41 officer involved shootings that occurred in 2003 to 2013. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 12 of 20 Greg Diamond spoke to several issues including the selective enforcement of free speech and why James Robert Reade's comments were not a concern, and William Fitzgerald's comments were. Daniel Lam spoke in opposition to Item No. 13. Council Communications (added to the agenda): Council Member Kring spoke of her attendance at the following events: Ready, Set, Go! Fire Station event and, Wig Wag Community garden event, the Kaboom! ribbon cutting at Modjeska Park, Anaheim Fire and Rescue promotion ceremony, Rotary Club Octoberfest, and the 2013 Senior Hero Award ceremony. She announced the Fall Festival and Halloween Parade on October 26 and the Veterans' Day celebration on November 9. Council Member Murray addressed the community concerns on homelessness and stated the City Council and the city were committed to looking into long term solutions and she would comment further when Item No. 13 was considered. CONSENT CALENDAR: At 7:05 P.M., Mayor Pro Tem Eastman requested Item No. 4 be removed from the consent calendar for further discussion; Mayor Tait pulled Item No's. 12 and 13 to be heard as one and Item No. 14; Council Member Kring removed Item No. 17. Mayor Tait stated he would record an abstention on Item Nos. 6, 8 and 9, as his firm worked with the Orange County Transportation Authority and Orange County Water District. Council Member Kring then waived reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions and to adopt the balance of the consent calendar as presented, in accordance with reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each city council member and as listed on the consent calendar, seconded by Council Member Mayor Pro Tem Eastman. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 5: (Mayor Tait and Council Members: Brandman, Eastman, Kring and Murray.) Noes — 0. Motion Carried. 8105 1. Receive and file minutes of the Community Services Board meetings of July 11, 2013 and August 8, 2013, Cultural and Heritage Commission meetings of July 18, 2013 and August 15, 2013, Sister City Commission meeting of August 26, 2013 and Public Utilities Board meeting of August 28, 2013. D117 2. Approve the Investment Portfolio Report for September 2013. D106 3. Approve carryover expenditure appropriations from fiscal year 2012/13 to fiscal year 2013/14 for projects previously approved by the City Council but not yet completed. 5. Waive the sealed bid requirements of Council Policy 4.0 and ratify a purchase order to D180 Duthie Generator Service, Inc., in the amount of $24,844, for the emergency use of two generators at 1311 and 1325 North Blue Gum Street serving multiple industrial businesses for the Public Utilities Department. 6. Approve an agreement with the Orange County Water District that grants reimbursement AGR- 7548.1 to the City for the cost of design, construction and construction management for the placement of a concrete cap over an existing water line for the Tustin /La Palma intersection project. Mayor Tait recorded an abstention on this item. Motion by Council Member Kring to approve, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Eastman. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 4: (Mayor Pro Tem Eastman and City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 13 of 20 Council Members: Brandman, Kring and Murray). Noes — 0. Abstention — 1: Mayor Tait. Motion Carried. 7. Approve a cooperative work agreement extension request to the California Department D175 of Finance for the Gene Autry Way (West) project. 8. Approve the Purchase and Sale Agreement and Grant Deed with SCEL Properties, LLC, in the amount of $153,321.92, for the sale of remnant property located at 1792 South AGR -7860 Carnelian Street (APN 129 - 395 -07). Mayor Tait recorded an abstention on this item. Motion by Council Member Kring to approve, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Eastman. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 4: (Mayor Pro Tem Eastman and Council Members: Brandman, Kring and Murray). Noes — 0. Abstention — 1: Mayor Tait. Motion Carried. 9. Approve and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager to execute and take the necessary actions to implement and administer an agreement, and any related AGR - 7842.1 documents, with the Irvine Community Development Company, LLC and The Irvine Land Company, LLC, that specifies cost sharing and indemnification responsibilities related to the proposed annexation of 2,355 acres in the eastern portion of the City of Anaheim into Orange County Water District. Mayor Tait recorded an abstention on this item. Motion by Council Member Kring to approve, seconded by Mayor Pro Tem Eastman. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 4: (Mayor Pro Tem Eastman and Council Members: Brandman, Kring and Murray). Noes — 0. Abstention — 1: Mayor Tait. Motion Carried. 10. Approve and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager to execute and take the necessary actions to implement and administer the Western System Power Pool AGR -7861 Agreement, Schedule R, Resource Contingent Bundled Renewable Energy Credit Confirmation, and any other related documents, with Noble Americas Gas & Power Corporation. 11. Approve and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager to execute and take the necessary actions to implement and administer the Renewable Power Purchase and AGR -7862 Sale Agreement with San Gorgonio Farms, Inc., and any other related documents including, but not limited to, a collateral assignment agreement, and authorize the Public Utilities General Manager, or designee, to exercise Agreement extension options, extend Scheduling Coordinator services beyond the Term, approve Contract Capacity increases, not to exceed 31 Megawatt, and approve, as applicable, Accepted Compliance Costs, in an amount not to exceed 3% of the Monthly Cash Settlement Amount for the latest Term Year and /or waive specified Seller Compliance Actions. 15. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -161 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF P124 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM accepting certain deeds conveying to the City of Anaheim certain real properties or interests therein (City Deeds Nos. 11534, 11535, 11536). 16. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -162 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF R100 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM condemning anti - semitic, homophobic, profane and hateful public comments, and urging that all City meetings be conducted with respect and decorum. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 14 of 20 D114 18. Approve minutes of the Council meetings of September 3, 2013. END OF CONSENT CALENDAR: D106 4. Amend the fiscal year 2012/13 budget by increasing appropriations in the City Attorney's Office by $725,000. Finance Director Debbie Moreno remarked at the end of FY 2013/13, departmental expenditures were compared to their appropriations and adjustments made accordingly. For this particular item, the appropriations would address several large court cases that required outside counsel in the city attorney's budget. She noted the increase was considered in the projects that were presented to council as part of the budget workshop in June and there would be no additional impact to the General Fund or the five year plan. This action, she stated, would reflect the $725,000 increase to the 2012/13 budget only and would have no impact on the department's current year budget. Mayor Pro Tern Eastman remarked that these were the type of expenses explained during closed session when outside counsel handled specific cases and moved to approve Item No. 4, seconded by Council Member Kring. Mayor Tait asked if it was possible to receive more detail from the city attorney. Mr. Houston responded that oftentimes his department operated in a reactive mode and when a case was filed and outside counsel was needed due to areas of expertise not available in- house, outside counsel would be retained. Last fiscal year, he stated, the majority of the costs associated with these allocations were for the Moreno litigation, i.e. districting litigation where the city was in a defensive posture as well as the medical marijuana dispensary cases, an amount of about $235,000. He indicated that the California Voting Right Act costs for the last fiscal year was approximately $612,000 with the difference in figures resulting from savings in other areas where outside counsel uses were less than anticipated. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 5: (Mayor Tait and Council Member: Brandman, Eastman, Kring and Murray). Noes — 0. Motion to approve carried. 12. Approve an agreement with the County of Orange, in the amount of $40,000, to fund approximately nine (9) additional days of shelter at the Fullerton Armory Emergency Shelter for the County of Orange Armory Emergency Shelter Program, which the County AGR -7863 will assign to its contractor Mercy House Living Centers, Inc. 13. ORDINANCE NO. 6290 (INTRODUCTION) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM adding Chapter 11.10 to Title 11 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to camping and storage of personal property in public areas and amending Section 1. 16.030 of Chapter 1.16 of Title 1 and Section 13.08.020 of Chapter 13.08 of Title 13 of M142 the Anaheim Municipal Code to be consistent with the addition of said Chapter 11.10 (continued from Council meetings of September 24, 2013, Item No. 29 and October 8, 2013, Item No. 22). City Manager Marcie Edwards announced these two items involved Anaheim's efforts with respect to the impacts of homeless on Anaheim's parks and public spaces and Community Services Director Terry Lowe and Police Chief Raul Quezada would provide staff report on both items. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 15 of 20 Mr. Lowe explained that most cities were experiencing this complex problem and that the causes of homelessness were difficult to eliminate and impacts difficult to mitigate, adding he heard from people representing opposing opinions daily. He discussed how his department had built dozens of collaborations to address social problems in the community, an important aspect of his service to the city and at the same time he tried to balance providing for the recreational needs of all and the responsibility of providing clean, safe attractive parks and the reason why he was recommending this ordinance. He added the department's intention was to make a difference and listed the various activities and support efforts to assist the homeless: From outreach workers who offered a way out of this lifestyle to organizations offering food, clothing, and other items of comfort; to librarians who welcomed the homeless every day, assisting them in using the internet and other services and the Human Resource staff at family resource and community centers handing out food and transportation vouchers and as well as assisted with crisis intervention; police officers and park rangers kept the peace in parks and were equipped to refer people in need to services through the 211 program; and housing staff who looked for ways to link people with appropriate housing. Additionally, nonprofit youth clubs like the Boys and Girls Club, the YMCA, and the Anaheim Community Foundation provided thousands of dollars in scholarships so disadvantaged kids could participate in recreational programs and teachers and staff at schools offered their talents and support to homeless children in many ways. With all these efforts, he pointed out, the reality was that this did not get the homeless indoors at night; they simply helped people get through another day on the street. Mr. Lowe emphasized the goal was to help the people living in and around La Palma Park, who wanted to be helped, into more appropriate housing. To that end a pilot project began across the street from the park and with council's support, the department entered into an agreement with Mercy House for daily outreach in the park to link people with services in this region. In addition, a storage place was being provided where the homeless could temporarily store their possessions to free them to leave the park for services and for shelter when it was available. And, he remarked, around the clock clean stocked restrooms would be available, eliminating another problem voiced by many nearby residents. He stated programs providing meals would be scheduled to insure food was not wasted and staff would work with local faith -based organizations in this effort recognizing that providing food was a method to build trust and an opportunity to develop relationships. So far, Mr. Lowe reported, 59 individuals registered with the pilot project, six people, including a family of four, had been referred to more appropriate living situations. He believed the project was making an impact and had received more positive comments from neighbors versus complaints since its implementation. Mr. Lowe emphasized that other recommendations from a multi - departmental strategy to address the issue of homelessness in Anaheim, would be brought to council in the near future. Having met with the poverty task force and listened to their concerns, he reported their most significant concern was the lack of a place people could go to in the event the ordinance was adopted; therefore, he added, on the agenda was a request for the appropriation of $40,000 as Anaheim's contribution to an effort to open the Fullerton shelter 18 days earlier than planned with the city of Fullerton, matching that amount. In response to other concerns, he was recommending that the ordinance not be implemented until at least 30 days after the county and cold weather shelter was opened because it was recognized that to get the word out about the shelter took time. This would provide a temporary shelter while giving additional time for the county to locate a permanent year -round shelter in north Orange County, a goal expressed by Supervisor Nelson at the recent homeless workshop. It also helped to encourage a closer City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 16 of 20 working relationship with other cities which was essential to achieving this goal. Specific to the park itself, he stated, this ordinance would enable the Police Department to facilitate the safe removal of property with appropriate notice and storage for a specific time period and allowed for additional park safety efforts in addressing increased drug and alcohol uses and other criminal behavior occurring in the park. He remarked that staff brought forward this ordinance due to the overwhelming outpouring of complaints received from residents and thousands of calls for police and fire services occurring at La Palma and other parks annually. Mr. Lowe added that if council approved this ordinance, an outreach campaign would be conducted before any action was taken with the goal of helping those who wanted to be helped. He noted this was the model that appeared to be working around the nation recognizing that successful models depended on the non - profit community and businesses who played major roles in overcoming this issue. He recommended council approve the ordinance and appropriate funds to early opening of the county shelter. Mayor Tait expressed his appreciation for this pilot project and for Supervisor Nelson's efforts to locate a year -round shelter. He reported that San Diego also had a program that appeared to be working and staff was researching that program as well as one being utilized in Albuquerque. He recommended calling the city's initiative "Coming Home Anaheim" with all agencies working together to solve the problem of homelessness, asking the city manager to work towards having a solution in place by the time the Armory closed after winter. The Mayor then moved approve Item No. 12 and to Introduce Ordinance No. 6290, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Eastman. She added that having every faith -based organization take responsibility in caring for the homeless made sense for her. Council Member Kring pointed out that other parks, such as Maxwell and Twila Reid suffered similar problems and should be included in these efforts. Council Member Murray indicated she supported both items on the agenda and expressed interest in Emily Sharp's suggestion as well, because it provided a day care center, year round shelter and emergency shelter services, complete case management systems, subsidized housing programs, outreach and mentorship. Council Member Brandman remarked that involving everyone in the solution was the true Anaheim way and would hopefully see a permanent solution before the Armory closed. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 5: (Mayor Tait and Council Members: Brandman, Eastman, Kring, and Murray). Noes — 0. Motion Carried. 14. RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -160 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF R100 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM in support of the Partnership for 21 Century Learning (P21) and officially declaring Anaheim to be a P21 City. Mayor Tait remarked that at the last meeting, over 200 students showed up in support of this plan for access to a global curriculum relevant to today and teach the five C's, i.e., communication, collaboration, critical thinking, creativity, and character. He was forming a task force to assist in connecting businesses and government leaders in this effort, asking Council Member Brandman to join him in bringing forward this concept and to approve RESOLUTION NO. 2013 -160 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM in support of the Partnership for 21 Century Learning (P21) and officially declaring Anaheim to be a P21 City, seconded by Council Member Kring. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 5: (Mayor Tait and Council Members: Brandman, Eastman, Kring and Murray). Noes — 0. Motion Carried. City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 17 of 20 17. Accept the lowest responsive and responsible bid and execute an agreement with Cypress Security, LLC, in an annual amount not to exceed $489,928, for security guard AGR -7864 services, in accordance with the scope of work, specifications, terms and conditions of competitive Bid # 7992 (continued from Council meeting of October 8, 2013, Item No. 06). Public Works Director Natalie Meeks reported Council had requested additional information on this item and that one of its goals was to review the security at city hall and develop a revised security plan. She explained that assessment was underway but would take between 9 to 12 months to complete and in the interim, recommended awarding the bid to Cypress Security. She indicated the contract could be terminated at any time should there be a need to make changes in the future. She further pointed out the bid process had specified each and all services required and that the penalties identified in the agreement were there to address any issues that came up in the contract and offered the ability to terminate the agreement if necessary. In addition, she remarked that the current provider, Andy Frain, was willing to continue on a month -to -month basis should council determine not to award the bid. Council Member Kring remarked she was inclined to go on a month -to -month basis with Andy Frain Services and then re- advertise the item as a Request for Proposal including the provision of a risk assessment for the city and possible award at a higher level if warranted. Mayor Pro Tern Eastman disclosed she had met with Cypress Security last week at their request and inquired how the costs compared with Andy Frain on a month -to -month basis versus awarding to Cypress Security. Ms. Meeks responded there was very little difference in the costs as the new contract included more technology as far as communication and logging data and the security supervisor was required to have a car to provide more mobility for their security staff. She added the current company had been using a city car, however, the city's risk management group indicted that was not appropriate. Council Member Murray stated a process established by the city had been followed and at the end of the process, it had been challenged by the bidders which put the low bidder at an unfair disadvantage and so far she had not heard a reason not to proceed with the bid award. She wondered why the bid award was used rather than a Request for Proposal (RFP). Ms. Meeks remarked that the city did not go with an RFP process because there were specific requirements in the bid document including quality level and experience and all of the companies who participated were well qualified and could and did provide excellent services for a number of organizations. She indicated the bid specifications were structured in that manner to set the bar for that certain quality and then compare apples to apples and rely on the price as the determining factor in the award. Ms. Murray asked staff if the bid process itself was challenged by any of the bid participants with Carole Ayuso, Purchasing Agent, indicating the only challenge came after the award. Council Member Murray remarked that since this was a one year process and a lot of time and effort had been invested, she would move to accept staff's recommendation and then take the time for the risk assessment analysis and recommend using a Request for Proposal process to determine the best quality vendor. Mayor Tait disclosed he had a phone conversation with Cypress Security CEO and met with representatives from Allied Barton. He also felt that qualitative factors should be taken into consideration through an RFP process. Council Member Murray asked what the bid proposals were with Ms. Meeks relaying that of six firms taking out bid documents, four submitted and the second low bidder was about one percent less than the lowest bid with the third bidder about 6 percent more. The fourth bidder was the furthest apart with a 14 percent increase over the low City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 18 of 20 bidder and she noted, all bidders complied with the quality standards. Ms. Murray also indicated she had a phone conversation with Allied Barton and met with Cypress Security. Council Member Brandman disclosed he had communicated with Cypress Security and Allied Barton within the last two days. He suggested that council could award the bid to Cypress Security because they followed the rules of the bid process and was the eligible low bidder and at the same time, could direct staff to immediately engage in an RFP course of action in fairness to Cypress Security. Council Member Kring asked that the current contractor be allowed to speak. Mr. Frain stated that he had voiced his objection to the proposed changes to the security services because there was a reduction in staff and because some security hours had been reduced. He also objected to the monitoring system stating it was not necessary and that the current system was in place, paid for by the city and working. He added if the contract remained on the 12 month rate, it would be the same pay rate as last year and the proposal from Cypress was $3 to $4 /hour higher because it was an all- inclusive bid and included a vehicle. He stated he also had a document from the city stating there was no need to drive a vehicle because city assets were better protected by security staff walking instead of riding. He felt this was contrary to the proposal emphasizing that in his experienced opinion, more security officers were needed. He stated he had also brought objections to the Purchasing Division but was not allowed to discuss the proposal with anyone except those in the Purchasing Department. Discussion continued with Mayor Tait remarking he would move to support staff's recommendation and approve the bid award, seconded by Council Member Kring, adding the provision that an RFP process would begin immediately. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 5: (Mayor Tait and Council Members: Brandman, Eastman, Kring and Murray.) Noes — 0. Motion Carried. 19. Appoint a representative to the Housing and Community Development Commission, 8105 West Council District, to complete an unexpired term ending June 30, 2015 (continued from Council meeting of October 8, 2013, Item No. 23). Housing and Community Development Commission (West Council District) Appointment: Darlene Powell (June 30, 2015) (unscheduled vacancy of Liz Gavarini) Mayor Pro Tem Eastman nominated Darlene Powell and Council Member Kring nominated Raymond Asad. Straw vote for Ms. Powell reflected Ayes — 4: Abstention — 1. Council Member Kring withdrew her nomination and Darlene Powell was unanimously appointed to the Housing and Community Development Commission, West District. 20. Receive and file the Police Department report on the impacts of the State Prison Realignment (continued from Council meeting of September 24, 2013, Item No 32). D160 Interim Police Chief Raul Quezada updated council on the impacts of AB109, the State Prison Realignment, explaining that AB109 mandated the overhaul of the prison system due to overcrowding. He reported those currently in custody convicted of non - violent, non - serious, and non - sexual felonies were remanded to the county level using county probation department and county facilities and prisons were subsequently reduced by 34,000 inmates sent to local City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 19 of 20 jurisdictions including the Orange County jail facility. Specific to Orange County, he remarked, about 3,100 PCS (post release community supervision) probationers were released and currently there were about 1,700 active PCS probationers in Orange County. In 2011 there were 366 released to Anaheim and currently, Anaheim had 265 active PCS probationers in Anaheim. On the 21 months prior to implementation of AB 109 and 21 months after, Interim Chief Quezada reported that overall Part 1 Crimes (homicide, rape, robbery, aggravated assault, burglary, theft, arson and motor vehicle theft) in the city of Anaheim showed an increase of 15 percent. Violent Part 1 crimes (homicide, rape, robbery and aggravated assault) reflected a 6.2 percent. Part 1 Crimes including burglary, theft, arson, and motor vehicle theft had an increase of 16.2 percent. He believed there was a correlation between the AB109 program and repeat offenders. Of the 265 PCS offenders in Anaheim, 212 were rearrested for a total of 426 arrests. With that, 39 percent were repeat offenders. In 2012, four homicides were committed by four Anaheim PCS offenders. He cited several examples to make his point, such as a PCS offender, arrested three times, once with narcotics and a handgun and a third time with a significant amount of methamphetamine and two hand guns. Another example was an Anaheim PCS offender who shot and killed two adult males in the west end of the county and since this incident, he remarked, there were three additional homicides attributed to the PCS offenders. Chief Quezada reported the state had allocated funds of about $260,000 last year to enhance the city's supervision of these PCS probationers. Officers were sent on assignments to conduct inspections to insure probationers were in compliance with requirements issued by the state or by its probation officers. This current fiscal year the funds dropped to $94,000 which would hamper the city's ability to continue the supervisor with the probation department, adding that actions were being taken to continue the monitoring program. He noted that when this program was implemented, personnel was directed to begin to track PCS offenders, where they were living, what crimes were occurring in those areas, and whether the department could connect the dots between the two. Existing personnel were asked to do double duty and work with the probation department to ensure monitoring was being done. A13986, recently signed by the Governor, would allow the city to use county jail facility to house those in violation of their probation terms, called flash incarceration, a time period from one to 10 days. He stated there had been some weekends where the probation department was in the field with officers and located some offenders in violation of their terms, but due to overcrowding at county facility, those offenders were not accepted. With this bill, those Anaheim PCS offenders would know if there were in violation of their probation or committed a crime, they would be incarcerated at the Anaheim facility. He noted that five of the County's probation officers work out of the Anaheim PD. The Department would continue to communicate through the crime analysis unit website asking the community to be aware and ask questions, adding that revealing the location of these probationers was prohibited. Council Member Eastman asked if there was any correlation between the homeless encampment and PCS probationers with Chief Quezada responding there were some probationers who were homeless and gave an intersection as an address but did not draw a correlation to the homeless encampment. Council Member Murray remarked the data and the program itself was unsettling and asked that this report be made available to the District Attorney and the State Attorney General and Office of the Governor so they could be made aware of Anaheim's statistics and impacts. She asked that the department also communicate to City Council Minutes of October 22, 2013 Page 20 of 20 residents ways in which could protect their property and themselves. Mayor Tait asked for a follow -up presentation of how the department plans to handle the impacts going forward. Council Member Brandman indicated that in late January or early February, there should be a clearer picture of what the next action of the state would be. Council Member Kring moved to accept the report, seconded by Mayor Pro Tern Eastman. Roll Call Vote: Ayes — 5: (Mayor Tait and Council Members: Brandman, Eastman, Kring and Murray.) Noes — 0. Motion Carried. Report on Closed Session Actions: None Council Communications: Mayor Pro Tern spoke of her attendance at the Kaboom! Ribbon cutting at Modjeska Park and the 5th Anniversary of My Safe Harbor. She announced the Annual Fall Festival and Halloween Parade on October 26 Council Member Murray spoke of the Military Banner program and the 17 honorees. She announced the opening of the Miraloma Park and Family Resource Center, Halloween Parade and Fall Festival on October 26 Canyon Hills Library Halloween activities, West Anaheim Youth Center and Grandma's House of Hope Halloween activities on October 31 followed by the 13th MEU Thanksgiving Drive. She requested a permanent change to the order of business to allow the Council an opportunity to provide Council comments at the conclusion of public comments as well as at the end of the meeting. She also spoke of the Kaboom! ribbon cutting and shared the thank you card she received from the children. Council Member Brandman spoke about his attendance at the Anaheim Fire and Rescue Block Party, Anaheim High School Alumni Association Classic Car Show, Choc Walk, and the Anaheim Union High School Splash -Off Gala. He announced the upcoming Halloween Parade and Fall Festival. He requested staff draft a resolution for the November 5 meeting to support of the US House of Representatives Resolution 30 which would support the continuation of its 6- day USPS mail delivery. He further requested staff prepare a proclamation for Human Rights Day for presentation at the December 10 meeting. Mayor Tait spoke of the Fall Festival and expressed his regrets that he would be unable to attend. He further spoke of his attendance at the Kaboom! ribbon cutting, Horace Mann Elementary Kindness Day, Choc Walk, and the Saint Justin Martyr playground ribbon cutting. He requested the Angel's item be placed on the next agenda to discuss the negotiation process and include the appraisal of the stadium. Adjournment: At 8:43 P.M., Mayor Tait adjourned the meeting of October 22, 2013 with the consent of council. R spe tfully submitted, Linda N. Andal, CMC City Clerk