The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2014/02/10 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, February 10, 2014 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chair: Victoria Ramirez • Chair Pro-Tempore: Harry Persaud • Commissioners: Peter Agarwal, Paul Bostwick, Mitchell Caldwell Michelle Lieberman, John Seymour • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, February 6, 2014, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 02/10/14 Page 2 of 8 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments: This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 02/10/14 Page 3 of 8 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2014-00260 (DEV2014-00003) Location: 1771 South Brookhurst Street Request: To rezone a City-owned vacant parcel, resulting from a street widening project, from the C-G (General Commercial) zone to the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) zone. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider if Environmental Impact Report No. 330 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 346 (Previously-Certified) are the appropriate environmental documents for the project. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Andy Nogal anogal@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05716 (DEV2013-00129) Location: 2821 East White Star Avenue, Unit K Request: To permit auto rentals in conjunction with an existing auto wholesale business (Haifaa Auto Exports). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: David See dsee@anaheim.net 02/10/14 Page 4 of 8 ITEM NO. 4 AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3156 (CUP3156B) (DEV2013-00096) Location: 721 East Ball Road Request: An amendment to a conditional use permit to allow the expansion of an existing computer training school into an adjacent unit. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Continued from the January 27, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. Motion Request for Continuance to February 24, 2014 Project Planner: Vanessa Norwood vnorwood@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05707 (DEV2013-00116) Location: 2717 West Lincoln Avenue Request: To permit beer and wine sales for on-site consumption in conjunction with an existing restaurant located in a retail center. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Andy Nogal anogal@anaheim.net 02/10/14 Page 5 of 8 ITEM NO. 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05713 DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2013-00104 (DEV2013-00124) Location: 280 South Lemon Street Request: To permit beer and wine sales for on and off- premises consumption in conjunction with a proposed tasting lounge located on the ground floor of a mixed-use building. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Andy Nogal anogal@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215C (DEV2013-00110) Location: 3200 East Carpenter Avenue Request: To amend a previously-approved conditional use permit to permit a new bumper boat attraction and to permit the collection of customer parking fees in the main parking lot located on the north side of Carpenter Street in conjunction with an existing miniature golf facility (Camelot Golfland). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Continued from the January 13, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: David See dsee@anaheim.net 02/10/14 Page 6 of 8 ITEM NO. 8 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650 VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 (DEV2012-00053) Location: 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934-954 North Keystone Street Request: To expand the existing Servite High School campus to include the following: (CUP) to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements; demolish four single family homes and construct and operate an aquatics center including lights for evening use and bleachers on the site of the existing residences to be demolished; reorient the existing baseball field with home plate being relocated to the southwest corner of the property and construct an adjacent team room, storage, restrooms, and a concession stand; erect a 30-foot high fence along the right and left-field edges of the reconfigured baseball field; erect field lighting for the baseball field; construct a 10-foot high block wall along the south and west property lines; relocate the music and weight room buildings to the site of the existing swimming pool in the central part of the campus; and replace field lighting for the track and football/soccer field; (TPM) to consolidate and incorporate the five parcels along Keystone Street into the main school campus property; and (VAR) to permit a reduced front yard setback along Keystone Street, to provide fewer parking spaces than required by Code, and fencing that is higher than permitted by Code. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether a Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate to serve as the environmental impact determination for this request per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Continued from the January 27, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: David See dsee@anaheim.net 02/10/14 Page 7 of 8 ITEM NO. 9 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-00113 (DEV2013-00136) Location: City-wide Request: A City-initiated amendment to Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code including, but not limited to, permitting breweries and other alcoholic beverage manufacturing businesses, including public tasting rooms, in commercial and industrial zones, by matter of right. Changes may also include additions and/or clarifications to the Code pertaining to the definitions of alcoholic beverage manufacturing and establishing operational requirements for these businesses. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the Zoning Code Amendment to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 21080 of the Public Resources Code. Continued from the January 27, 2014 Planning Commission meeting. Motion Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, February 24, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. 02/10/14 Page 8 of 8 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 4:00 p.m. February 5, 2014 LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2014-00260 LOCATION: 1771 South Brookhurst Street APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The property owner is the City of Anaheim. REQUEST: This is a City-initiated request to rezone this property from the General Commercial (G-G) zone to the Single-Family Residential (RS-2) zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that Previously-Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 330 and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012- 00346 are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request, and approving Reclassification No. 2014-00260. BACKGROUND: This .15-acre, vacant “remnant” parcel was created as a result of the recent widening of Katella Avenue. Although currently zoned for commercial use, the property is designated for Low Density Residential land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include vacant land and single family homes to the north and west, vacant land to the east across Brookhurst Street, and commercial uses to the south across Katella Avenue. PROPOSAL: The City proposes to rezone this property from the General Commercial zone to the Single-Family Residential zone. The subject parcel is contiguous to two other City-owned parcels located to the north and west. The City intends to consolidate all three parcels into one larger parcel that would accommodate one single-family home. ANALYSIS: The proposed RS-2 zone designation is consistent with, and would implement, the property’s existing Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation. The predominant land uses surrounding this property are single family homes. Therefore, this request would create zoning consistency with the General Plan land use designation and single-family residential properties surrounding the subject parcel. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2014-00260 February 10, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Environmental Impact Report No. 330 (“EIR 330”) and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346 (“FSEIR 2012-00346”), certified in conjunction with the City’s General Plan Update program, analyzed the impacts associated with rezoning properties in a manner consistent with their underlying General Plan designation. As a result, the environmental impacts associated with this rezoning request were adequately analyzed and addressed by EIR 330 and FSEIR 2012-00346. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends approval of the reclassification request because the proposed zoning implements the General Plan designation for this property and would permit a land use which is consistent and compatible with surrounding uses. Prepared by, Submitted by, Andy Nogal Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Reclassification Resolution 3. Applicant’s Letter of Request The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 4. Site Photographs 5. Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346 RS-2SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE C-GCONCORDECAREERINSTITUTE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2VACANT RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2VACANT RS-2VACANT RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE C-GSERVICESTATION C-GOFFICES RS-2VACANT RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-GVACANT TSINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE C I T Y O F G A R D E N G R O V ECITY O F G A R D E N G R O V E W KATELLA AVE S BROOKHURST STS WILLIAM MILLER DRS CAROLEEN LNW JUDIT H LN W MIDWOOD LN S BISCAYNE CTW MIDWOOD LN . S. EUCLID STW. KATELLA AVES. GILBERT STS. BROOKHURST STS. MAGNOLIA AVE1 7 7 1 So uth Brookhurst Street D E V N o. 2014-00003 Subject Property APN: 127-613-13 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 12 W KATELLA AVE S BROOKHURST STS WILLIAM MILLER DRS CAROLEEN LNW JUDITH LN W MIDWOOD LN S BISCAYNE CTW JUDIT H LN W MIDWOOD LN . S. EUCLID STW. KATELLA AVES. GILBERT STS. BROOKHURST STS. MAGNOLIA AVE17 7 1 S o u t h B r o o kh u r s t St r e e t DE V N o . 2 0 1 4 -0 0 0 0 3 Subjec t Property APN: 127-613-13 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2012 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2014-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2014-00260 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (DEV2014-00003) (1771 SOUTH BROOKHURST STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter "Planning Commission") did receive a verified Petition for reclassification, designated as Reclassification No. 2014-00260, for that certain real property located at 1771 South Brookhurst Street, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of a vacant remnant parcel left over from a street widening project located in the C-G (General Commercial) Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Low Density Residential land uses; and WHEREAS, the applicant requests to rezone the Property from the C-G (General Commercial) Zone to the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) Zone; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"), to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Reclassification No. 2014-00260 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, on September 9, 2013, the Planning Commission conducted a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Draft Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346, which had been prepared in connection with proposed General Plan Amendment No. 2013-00488 to update Tables LU-5: Residential Buildout Estimates and LU-6: Non- Residential Build-Out Estimates of the Land Use Element of the General Plan and related text to reflect the forty-two (42) amendments to the General Plan that have been adopted since the 2004 General Plan Update, and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2013-00110 and Zoning Reclassification No. 2013-00255 to implement Housing Production Strategy 1V: Rezoning of Housing Opportunity Sites; and WHEREAS, upon the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council, by the adoption of its Resolution No. 2013-150 on September 24, 2013, which is incorporated herein by this reference, certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346 ("FSEIR 2012-00346") and adopted Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and Mitigation Monitoring Program 122A for General Plan Amendment No. 2013-00488, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2013-00110 and Zoning Reclassification No. 2013- 00255; and - 2 - PC2014-*** WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that Environmental Impact Report No. 330 (“EIR 330”) and FSEIR 2012-00346, certified in conjunction with the City’s General Plan Update program, is all that is necessary in connection with the proposed reclassification of the Property and its approval and that none of the conditions set forth in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the Guidelines of the California Environmental Quality Act calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report or a supplement to EIR 330 and FSEIR 2012-00346 have occurred; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. Reclassification of the Property from the C-G (General Commercial) Zone to the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) Zone is consistent with the property’s existing Low Density Residential General Plan land use designation. 2. The proposed reclassification of the Propert y is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the community and is compatible with surrounding land uses to the west, north and east across Brookhurst Street which are designated for Low Density Residential land uses. South and southeast of the Property across Katella Avenue are commercial uses and single family homes to the southeast located in the City of Garden Grove, respectively. Moreover, the proposed reclassification is compatible with the surrounding properties which consist predominately of vacant parcels and single family homes. 3. The proposed reclassification of the Property does properly relate to the zone and its permitted uses locally established in close proximity to the property and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby unconditionally approve Reclassification No. 2014-00260 to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim Municipal Code to rezone and reclassify the property into the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) Zone. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the Property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2014. CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 3 - PC2014-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISS IONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2014. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2014-*** ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Subject Site – Northwest Corner of Brookhurst and Katella Subject Site – Northwest Corner of Brookhurst and Katella ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Subject Site–Looking East from Adjacent Vacant Lot Subject Site–Looking South from Adjacent Vacant Lot City-owned Vacant Lot to the North City-owned Vacant Lot to the West Single Family Homes to the West on Biscayne Court Single Family Homes to the Northwest on Midwood Lane Properties to the East Across Brookhurst Properties to the South Across Katella (City of Garden Grove) Properties to the Southeast Across Katella (City of Garden Grove) ATTACHMENT NO. 5 -1- PC2013-*** Revised by MZ 12/14/18 – Error on General Plan link Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346 Environmental Impact Report No. 330 (“EIR 330”) and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346 (“FSEIR 2012-00346”), certified in conjunction with the City’s General Plan Update program, analyzed the impacts associated with rezoning properties in a manner consistent with their underlying General Plan designation. As a result, the environmental impacts associated with Reclassification No. 2014-00260 were adequately analyzed and addressed by FEIR 330 and FSEIR 346. These documents can be accessed on-line at http://www.anaheim.net/712/generalplan (click on the links to the documents on the right side of the page). ATTACHMENT NO. 5 -1- PC2013-*** Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346 Environmental Impact Report No. 330 (“EIR 330”) and Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2012-00346 (“FSEIR 2012-00346”), certified in conjunction with the City’s General Plan Update program, analyzed the impacts associated with rezoning properties in a manner consistent with their underlying General Plan designation. As a result, the environmental impacts associated with Reclassification No. 2014-00260 were adequately analyzed and addressed by FEIR 330 and FSEIR 346. These documents can be accessed on-line at www.anaheim.net/generalplan (click on the links to the documents on the right side of the page). 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05716 LOCATION: 2821 East White Star Avenue, Unit K (Haifaa Auto Exports) REQUEST: The applicant proposes to permit a car rental facility in conjunction with an existing auto wholesale business. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1 - Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05716. BACKGROUND: The 2.1-acre project property is developed with a business park that consists of three industrial buildings with 23 individual tenant spaces. The General Plan designates the property for Industrial land uses. The property is located within the Northeast Area Specific Plan, Development Area 1 – Industrial Area (SP94-1, DA1) zone. The property is surrounded by industrial uses in all directions. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to establish a car rental business within an existing 3,100 square foot tenant space currently occupied with an existing import/export auto wholesale facility. The auto wholesale business has been operating at this location since 2003. The existing business includes a reception room, office, restroom, and seven parking spaces within the warehouse building. The parking spaces would be used to store cars for both wholesale and rental purposes. The applicant does not propose to display rental cars outside of the building. Because the business buys and sells cars for wholesale import/export only, the applicant proposes to provide rental cars for visiting international clients only. Car rentals would be arranged solely by appointment. No auto repair or maintenance is proposed on site. No expansion to the tenant space is proposed. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05716 February 10, 2014 Page 2 of 2 ANALYSIS: The Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit to allow car rental facilities in this zone to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. The proposed facility would be compatible with the surrounding area as this business park which is predominately occupied with industrial and office uses. Additional parking would not be required for the car rental use beyond what is required for the existing business. The applicant does not propose to display rental cars in the parking lot and a condition of approval prohibiting such activity is included in the attached draft resolution. CONCLUSION: Staff recommends approval of the request as the proposed auto rental facility would be compatible with adjacent uses and would provide a service that is complementary to the surrounding Anaheim Canyon business area. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit request. Prepared by, Submitted by, David See Jonathan E. Borrego Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3. Applicant’s Letter of Operation The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 4. Photos 5. Plans SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1AINDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1ARECYCLINGFACILITY SP 94-1DA1AANAHEIM DISPOSAL SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL91 FREEWAY E LA P A L M A A V EN BL UE GUM STE G R E T T A LN E WHITE STAR AVEE C O R O N A D O S T N BL UE GUM STN VAN HORNE WAYE BLUE STAR STE GRETTA LNE . L A P A L M A A V E E . M IR A L O M A A V E E. LINCOLN AVEN. STATE COLLEGE BLVDN. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA ST28 2 1 E a st W h it e St a r Ave n u e DE V N o . 2 0 1 3 -0 0 1 2 9 Subjec t Property APN: 344-051-12 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2012 91 FREEWAY E LA P A L M A A V EN BL UE GUM STE G R E T T A LN E WHITE STAR AVEE C O R O N A D O S T N BL UE GUM STN VAN HORNE WAYE BLUE STAR STE GRETTA LNE . L A P A L M A A V E E . M IR A L O M A A V E E. LINCOLN AVEN. STATE COLLEGE BLVDN. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA ST28 2 1 E a st W h it e St a r Ave n u e DE V N o . 2 0 1 3 -0 0 1 2 9 Subjec t Property APN: 344-051-12 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2012 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2014-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05716 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2013-00129) (2821 EAST WHITE STAR AVENUE, UNIT K) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05716 to permit a car rental facility in conjunction with an existing auto wholesale business (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") for certain real property located at 2821 East White Star Avenue, Unit K, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of approximately 2.1 acres and is developed with a business park with three industrial buildings. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Industrial land uses. The Property is located within the Industrial Area (Development Area 1) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan (SP 94-1) zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.120 (Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SP 94-1; Zoning and Development Standards) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on February 10, 2014 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05716 to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is within that class of projects which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request to permit the Proposed Project on the Property does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit the Proposed Project in the Industrial Area (Development Area 1) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan (SP94-1) zone is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Section 18.120.050.050.0547 (Vehicle Sales Agencies and Lots) of the Code. - 2 - PC2014-*** 2. The request to permit the Proposed Project would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the property is currently occupied with predominantly industrial businesses and the proposed use is an appropriate use within the complex; and 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because no expansion to the tenant space is proposed, additional parking would not be required for the car rentals, and there would be an adequate number of parking spaces provided to accommodate all of the businesses on the property; and 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site are consistent with the existing commercial and industrial uses permitted by right within the zone; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the subject site is developed a business park which allows industrial and comnmercial businesses and the proposed car rental business will be compatible with the surrounding uses. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05716, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 3 - PC2014-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2014. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2014. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2014-*** - 5 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05716 (DEV2013-00129) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY GENERAL 1 The display of automobiles for sales and rental purposes shall not be permitted within the outdoor parking lot areas. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 2 Portions of the property under control of the tenant shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty four (24) hours from time of occurrence. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 3 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 4 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 5 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3156 LOCATION: 721 East Ball Road (Ball Road Business Park) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is United School of America and the property owner is The Realty Associates Fund VI, L.P. REQUEST: This hearing was continued from the January 27, 2014, Commission meeting. The applicant has submitted a second request to continue this hearing to the February 24, 2014, Planning Commission meeting in order to allow additional time to clarify the project description. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that this hearing be continued to the February 24, 2014 Planning Commission meeting, as requested by the applicant. Prepared by, Submitted by, Vanessa Norwood Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Applicant’s Letter of Request IOFFICES IAUTO REPAIR/SERVICE IINDUSTRIAL IADULTTHEATER IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL E BALL RD S ALLEC STE. BALL RD S. SUNKIST STS. ANAHEI M BLVDS. HARBOR BLVDS. EAST STE. CERRITOS AVE W. BALL RD 72 1 E a st B a ll Ro a d DE V N o . 2 0 1 3 -0 0 0 9 6 Subjec t Property APN: 234-121-22 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2012 E BALL RD S ALLEC STE. BALL RD S. SUNKIST STS. ANAHEI M BLVDS. HARBOR BLVDS. EAST STE. CERRITOS AVE W. BALL RD 72 1 E a st B a ll Ro a d DE V N o . 2 0 1 3 -0 0 0 9 6 Subjec t Property APN: 234-121-22 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2012 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05707 LOCATION: 2717 West Lincoln Avenue (Maki Yaki Japanese Grill) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Kyu Won Yang and the property owner is Clausen Enterprises. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow beer and wine sales for on-premises consumption in conjunction with an existing restaurant within a retail center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05707. BACKGROUND: This .76-acre project site is developed with a commercial building in the General Commercial (C-G) zone. The site is designated for Low- Medium Density Residential land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include an RV storage facility to the west, apartments to the north and to the south across Lincoln Avenue and apartments and commercial uses to the east across La Reina Circle. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to serve beer and wine in conjunction with an existing 1,706 square foot restaurant. No expansion or modification of the existing restaurant is proposed. The restaurant would continue to operate Monday through Saturday from 10:00 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. and be closed on Sundays. ANALYSIS: The sale of beer and wine in conjunction with a restaurant is allowed in this zone subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. A determination of public convenience or necessity is not required for restaurants serving beer and wine. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05707 February 10, 2014 Page 2 of 2 This site is within Census Tract No. 868.03 which has a population of 7,478. Based on the size of the population, eight on-sale licenses are allowed in this census tract and there are six licenses existing. The proposed license would be the seventh on-sale license in the census tract. Four off-sale licenses are also allowed in this census tract, and currently there are five such licenses. The proposed alcoholic beverage service would be compatible with the surrounding area as this is a predominantly commercial area with other restaurants, retail businesses and offices fronting on Lincoln Avenue. This location is within Police Reporting District 1617, which is 62 percent above the city average in crime. Within a one-quarter mile radius of this location, the crime rate is 168 percent above the city average. The calls for service within the surrounding area were primarily related to auto burglaries and theft, petty theft, simple assault and vandalisms. There have been no calls for service related to the subject restaurant. The Anaheim Police Department has reviewed this request and does not oppose the project subject to the recommended conditions of approval. These recommended conditions require the applicant to provide a variety of security measures, including adequate parking lot lighting, a comprehensive security alarm system and other operational requirements to ensure that the business operates in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding area. CONCLUSION: Subject to the recommended conditions of approval, the request to permit beer and wine service in conjunction with the existing restaurant would be compatible with the surrounding commercial and residential uses. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Andy Nogal Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3. Applicant’s Letter of Operation 4. Police Department Memorandum The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 5. Site Photographs 6. Architectural Plans (Site and Floor Plans) C-GRETAIL RM-4MOROCCOAPARTMENTS35 DU C-GCAR WASH TCRESTMOTEL RM-4DUPLEX RM-4SAN MARCUS56 DU RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE O.C.F.C.D. TO.C.F.C.D. RM-4VACANT RM-4BEACHSIDEAPARTMENTS42 DU C-GRETAIL RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE O.C.F.C.D.T (MHP)LIBERTY TRAVEL PARK RM-4COURTYARDAPARTMENTS48 DUTSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO.EASEMENTC-GRETAIL RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4PALM WESTAPARTMENTS18 DU RM-4LINCOLN PARKAPARTMENTS63 DURM-4SFR C-GRETAIL TSFR C-GLINCOLNRV PARK RM-4HARBOR VILLAGEAPARTMENTS112 DU RM-4FRANCISCANAPARTMENTS70 DU C-GVALENCIA INNRM-4LINCOLN INN TNURSERY RM-4ADELPHI APARTMENTS35 DU C-GRETAIL RM-2CONDOMINIUM/TOWNHOUSE95 DU RM-4SAN CARLOSAPARTMENTS56 DU W LINCOLN AVE W LINCOLN AVEW LINCOLN AVE W YAL E AV E S STINSON STN LA REINA CIRW. LINCOLN AVE W. BRO ADWAY W. ORANGE AVE W. CRESCENT AVE N. DALE AVE. CRESCENT AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVES. MAGNOLIA AVEN. BROOKHURST STW. LINCOLN AVE 2 7 1 7 Wes t Linc oln Avenue D E V N o. 2013-00116 Subject Property APN: 070-534-19 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 12 W LINCOLN AVE W LINCOLN AVEW LINCOLN AVE W YAL E AV E S STINSON STN LA REINA CIRW. LINCOLN AVE W. BROADWAY W. ORANGE AVE W. CRESCENT AVE N. DALE AVE. CRESCENT AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVES. MAGNOLIA AVEN. BROOKHURST STW. LINCOLN AVE 27 1 7 We s t L i n co ln Av e n u e DE V N o . 2 0 1 3 -0 0 1 1 6 Subjec t Property APN: 070-534-19 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2012 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2014-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05707 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2013-00116) (2717 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05707 to permit the sale and on-site consumption of beer and wine in conjunction with an existing restaurant within an existing building located in a commercial center at 2717 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California. The location of the commercial center is generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately .76-acres, is developed with a commercial building measuring 10,300 square feet. The Property is located in the C-G (General Commercial) Zone and is designated for Low-Medium Density Residential land uses by the General Plan land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on February 10, 2014 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is within that class of projects which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request to permit beer and wine service for on- premises consumption in conjunction with an existing restaurant within an existing commercial center does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit beer and wine service for on-premises consumption in conjunction with an existing restaurant within an existing commercial center in the General Commercial (“C-G”) Zone is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Section 18.08.030.010 (Alcoholic Beverage Sales On-Sale) of the Code; - 2 - PC2014-*** 2. The request to permit beer and wine service for on-premises consumption in conjunction with an existing restaurant would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the property is currently developed with a commercial center and the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area; and 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the property is currently improved with a commercial center and there is no proposed expansion; and 4. The traffic generated by the proposed restaurant would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site are consistent with the existing commercial uses at the Property and the permitted businesses within the commercial center; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the subject site is a commercial center which allows restaurant businesses and the restaurant is compatible with the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05707 subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of a portion of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 3 - PC2014-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2014. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ___ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2014. _____________________ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2014-*** - 5 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05707 (DEV2013-00116) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY GENERAL CONDITIONS 1 Managers and/or owners are responsible for obtaining LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for themselves and employees serving or selling alcohol. This program must be completed prior to the owner/manager/employee’s service or sales of alcoholic beverages. Police Department 2 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, or minimum purchase required. Police Department 3 At all times when the premises is open for business, the premises shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. Police Department 4 There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Police Department 5 That subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code. Police Department 6 There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premise at any time unless the proper permits for a “special event” have been obtained from the City of Anaheim. Police Department 7 The business shall not employ or permit any persons to solicit or encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the licensed premises under any commission, percentage, salary, or other profit-sharing plan, scheme or conspiracy. (Section 24200.5 Alcoholic Beverage Control Act) Police Department 8 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and Police Department - 6 - PC2014-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. 9 Windows of restaurant shall not be covered by advertising to the extent that the interior is not clearly visible from the outside to enable officers responding to potential emergency situations to observe any activity which may be occurring inside. Police Department 10 Any graffiti painted or marked upon portions of the premises under the control of the business owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement 11 The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnities”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnities concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnities and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnities in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department 12 The portions of this property under control of the business owner shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash and/or debris. Code Enforcement 13 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police/ Planning Department - 7 - PC2014-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 14 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department 15 The restaurant shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation as described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Operation and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department 16 The premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to and reviewed and approved by the City of Anaheim, which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked as Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan) and Exhibit No. 2 (Floor Plan). Planning Department 2717 W. Lincooln Ave. Anaheim, CA 92801 Tel:(714)484-1100 Fax: (714)484-1612 Letter of Operation Maki Yaki Japanese Grill (Maki Yaki) is located 2717 W. Lincoln Ave in Anaheim, CA. Maki Yaki is requesting conditional use permit to sell beer and wine to accommodate more complete Japanese dining experiences for restaurant customers by serving Sake, traditional alcoholic drink served with Japanese food, either hot or cold. If I may use an analogy, without Sake is like having a salad without dressing or having a mashed potato without gravy. We will also be offering Japanese beer and wine to the customers. During the weekdays, averages of 50 to 60 customers are served per day. On Saturdays, averages of 70 to 80 customers are served. However, with proposed modification, we are confident number of customers will increase as much as 30%. Proposed Operations Maki Yaki Hours: Monday – Saturday: open 10:00 a.m. to 9:30 p.m. Sunday: Closed Employees: There are a total of five (5) employees. On average, three (3) employees are working at any given time during the week; while four (4) work on Saturdays. It is anticipated that two (2) additional employees will need to be hired. Security: Maki Yaki has a modern surveillance system, which includes over 10 video cameras (including cameras in the parking area). Parking: There are a total of 40 spaces located in the Maki Yaki parking lot. The existing parking lot, located to the south and north of the building, is more than adequate to serve the restaurant customer. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 In Front Northview from Lincoln Southview from the storefront ATTACHMENT NO. 5 In front Eastview Westview In back North view Eastview In back SOUTHVIEW WESTVIEW Counter Restroom Office Kitchen Storage Sink/Prep Room Counter 29 FT 64 FT 5.5 FT 14 FT 9 FT 6.5 FT 10 FT 10 FT 15 FT 10 FT 8 FT 9 FT 33 FT 2717 W. Lincoln Ave. Anaheim, CA 92801 Dining Hall Max. Occupancy: 50 Swing Door 2717 W. Lincoln Ave. Anaheim, CA 92801 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05713 AND DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2013-00104 LOCATION: 280 South Lemon Street (Doria Lofts Mixed Use Project) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Sonya Villegas-Kelson and the property owner is CIM Anaheim, L.P. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to allow beer and wine sales for on- and off-premises consumption in conjunction with a beer and wine tasting lounge in an existing vacant retail tenant space. This applicant is also requesting approval of a determination of public convenience or necessity to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1- Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2013- 05713 and Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2013-00104. BACKGROUND: This 2.46-acre project site is developed with a mixed-use development consisting of three residential buildings with 182 apartment units (commonly known as the Doria Lofts, The Promenade and Carnegie Plaza) and approximately 23,000 square feet of ground floor commercial space. The property is located within the General Commercial (C-G) and Downtown Mixed Use (DMU) Overlay zones and is designated for Mixed-Use land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include a church and commercial uses to the south across Broadway, the Broadway Arms mixed-use development to the west across Lemon Street, offices and commercial uses to the north and City Hall to the east across Anaheim Boulevard. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05713 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2013-00104 February 10, 2014 Page 2 of 3 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing beer and wine sales for on- and off-premises consumption in conjunction with a planned 1,236 square foot tasting lounge. The applicant would also offer food service involving a selection of cheese plates, nuts, crackers, bread, and sandwiches purchased from restaurants and retailers in the downtown area that would be available upon request. The business would include display shelves, a bar and counter area, a prep area, a storage area and a restroom. The lounge area would include ten tables and 24 chairs and ten seats at the bar area for a total of 34 seats. Proposed hours of operation are Tuesdays through Thursdays 10:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., Fridays and Saturdays between 11:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m., and Sundays between 12:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. The business would be closed on Mondays. ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Staff has evaluated the applicant’s application to permit a Type 42 (On Sale Beer and Wine - Public Premises) Alcoholic Beverage Control license, which would authorize the same of beer and wine for consumption on or off the premises. Staff supports the request. The proposed beer and wine sales and tasting lounge would complement and be compatible with existing uses in this neighborhood which consist of restaurants and retail stores. Public Convenience or Necessity: The applicant’s request to allow sales of beer and wine for off- site consumption requires a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. State law limits the issuance of new alcoholic beverage sales licenses when a license is requested for a property located in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average or when there is an overconcentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. However, the law also states that such restrictions can be waived if the local jurisdiction makes a determination that the proposed outlet would serve "public convenience or necessity." A Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity is required in this case because approval of this request will result in an over-concentration of off-premises alcohol sales licenses within this census tract and because this property is located in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average. The California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (“ABC”) bases the number of permitted alcohol licenses on the population of the Census Tract in which the proposed license would be located. The subject site is located within Census Tract No. 873.00, which has a population of 10,413. Based on this population, six off-sale licenses are allowed and there are presently six licenses in the tract. In addition, 11 on-sale alcohol licenses are allowed within this Census tract and there are presently nine licenses in the tract. It should be noted that 12 additional on-sale licenses have been approved in this census tract at the nearby Packing House project on Anaheim Boulevard. Of the 12 licenses previously approved by the Planning Commission, ten licenses are currently in the process of receiving final ABC authorization. The two remaining licenses are anticipated to be used by future restaurant tenants of the Packing House. The property is located in Police Reporting District No. 1624 which has a crime rate that is 168 percent above the City’s average crime rate. The crime rate within a one quarter mile radius of this site is 313 percent above CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05713 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2013-00104 February 10, 2014 Page 3 of 3 the citywide average based upon calls for service. Since the use is yet to be established, no crime statistics are available for this location. However, staff believes that the Type 42 ABC license being proposed would complement the other businesses in the area. In addition, the draft resolution approving the conditional use permit includes several operational conditions of approval typically imposed to ensure that all alcohol-serving business operate in a manner that is compatible with surrounding uses. The proposed business requires ten parking spaces. The subject site provides 35 parking spaces to the rear of the proposed use. In addition, ample parking is provided within the adjacent parking structures that are designed to provide convenient parking for customers of the Downtown businesses. Therefore, adequate parking will be available to accommodate the proposed use and the existing businesses on the property. CONCLUSION: The proposed beer and wine store and tasting lounge is consistent with the goals of the property’s Mixed-Use General Plan designation and DMU Overlay zone which encourage a mix of residential and commercial uses in this neighborhood. The proposed use, as conditioned, will complement the surrounding neighborhood businesses the other uses envisioned for the Downtown. Staff recommends approval of the proposed use. Prepared by, Submitted by, Andy Nogal Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution 3. Applicant’s Letter of Operation 4. Police Department Memorandum The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 5. Site Photographs 6. Plans (Site and Floor Plans) C -G (D M U )M IX E D U S E RM-4HELENA COURTAPTS13 DU C -G (S A B C )R E T A IL I (SABC)VACANT C-GPARKING C-GHERITAGE FORUM RM-4 (SABC)APARTMENTS16 DU C -G S E R V IC E S T A T IO N O -L V A C A N T B U IL D IN G C -G M O R T U A R Y RS-2OFFICES RM-4RELIGIOUS USE C -G (S A B C )A P T S6 D U C-G (DMU)POST OFFICE C -G (D M U )R E S T A U R A N T I (SABC)VACANT I (SABC)PARKING TDOWNTOWN COMMUNITY CENTER T (SABC)LITTLE PEOPLE'S PARK RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4APTS10 DU R M -4 P A R K IN G L O T C -G (S A B C )R E L IG IO U S U S E I (S A B C )S E L F S T O R A G E F A C IL IT Y C -G (D M U )M U S E U M O -L O F F IC E S C -G (S A B C )A P T S6 D U C -G (D M U )P A R K IN G S T R U C T U R E I (SABC)PACKING HOUSE C -G C IT Y H A L L C -G (D M U )P A R K IN G S T R U C T U R E C -G (D M U )R E T A IL I (SABC)AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE IR E S T A U R A N T S I (SABC)FARMERS PARKI (SABC)RESTAURANT /BREWERYRM-4APARTMENTS6 DU RM-4TRIPLEX RM-3 (SABC)SFRC -G (D M U )M IX E D U S E 9 5 D U I (SABC)VACANT RM-4 (SABC)DUPLEX C -G (D M U )M IX E D U S E C -G (D M U )C IT Y H A L L C -G (D M U )R E T A IL I (M U )A P A R T M E N T S R M -3 (S A B C )D U P L E X C -G R E L IG IO U S U S E C-GCAR WASHW B R O A D W A Y S ANAHEI M BL VDE B R O A D W A YS ANAHEI M BLVDW O A K S T S L EMON STW E L M S T E C E N T E R S T S CL EMENTI NE STS 42ND STS CL EMENTI NE STW C E N T E R S T R E E T P R O M E N A D E S. EAST STE . L IN C O L N A V E W .LI N C O L N A V E W . B R O A D W A Y N. EAST STN. HARBOR BLVDS. M A N C H E S T E R A V E E . B R O A D W A YN. ANAHEI M BLVDS. ANAHEI M BLVDE . B R O A D W A Y 2 8 0 Sou th Lemon St (retail Space) D E V N o. 2013-00124 Subject Property APN: 037-015-02037-015-15037-015-18037-015-14037-015-20037-015-21037-015-11037-015-13 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 12 037-015-07037-015-12037-015-16037-015-19037-015-17037-015-04037-015-10 W B R O A D W A Y S ANAHEI M BL VDE B R O A D W A YS ANAHEI M BLVDW O A K S T S LEMON STW E L M S T E C E N T E R S T S CL EMENTI NE STS 42ND STS CL EMENTI NE STW C E N T E R S T R E E T P R O M E N A D E S. EAST STE . L IN C O L N A V E W.LI N C O L N A V E W . B R O A D W A Y N. EAST STN. HARBOR BLVDS. M A N C H E S T E R A V E E . B R O A D W A YN. ANAHEI M BLVDS. ANAHEI M BLVDE . B R O A D W A Y 28 0 S o u t h L e m o n St (r e t a il Sp a c e ) DE V N o . 2 0 1 3 -0 0 1 2 4 Subjec t Property ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2012 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2014-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05713 AND MAKING A DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC C ONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2013-00104 FOR A TYPE 42 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE (DEV2013-00124) (280 SOUTH LEMON STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05713 to permit a Type 42 (On-Sale General – Public Premises) ABC license within a portion of the ground floor commercial retail space at the Doria Lofts Mixed-use Project and an associated determination of public convenience or necessity to permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for on and off-premises consumption in conjunction with the proposed wine and beer tasting lounger, pursuant to Section 18.60.190 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") for that certain real property located at 280 South Lemon Street in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (herein referred to as the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 2.46-acres in size and is developed with three residential buildings consisting of a total of 182 apartment units (commonly known as the Doria Lofts, The Promenade and Carnegie Plaza) and 22,944 square feet of ground floor commercial retail space. The Property is located in the C-G (General Commercial) and DMU (Downtown Mixed Use Overlay) Zone and is designated for Mixed-Use land uses by the Land Use Element of the General Plan; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by Resolution No. 95R-134 and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05713 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2013-00104, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is within that class of projects which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2014-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2013-00104, does find and determine the following facts: 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Resolution No. 95R-134, establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "public convenience or necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the California Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California (“ABC”). 2. Section 23958 of the California Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by issuance of a license. For purposes of Section 23958, "undue concentration" means the case in which the premises are located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The premises are located in a crime reporting district that has a 168% greater number of "reported crimes" (as defined in Section 23958.4) than the average number of reported crimes as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the premises are located does not exceed the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the premises are located does not exceed the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations, and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. - 3 - PC2014-*** 5. The Property is located within Census Tract No. 873.00 with a population of 10,413 that allows for (6) off-sale ABC licenses and eleven (11) on-sale licenses. There are presently (6) off-sale licenses and (9) on-sale licenses in the census tract. The Anaheim Police Department evaluates these requests based on the crime rates within the police reporting district by utilizing a one-quarter mile radius for the subject site. The subject site is in Reporting District 1624 which has a 168 percent above-average crime rate and a crime rate of 313 percent above the average within a one-quarter mile radius. 6. A determination of Public Convenience or Necessity can be made based on the finding that the license requested under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the sale of alcoholic beverages complements other retail stores and restaurants within the Downtown and would serve as an added convenience to those who choose to patronize this establishment. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05713, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit a Type 42 (On-Sale Beer and Wine – Public Premises) ABC license in conjunction with a beer and wine store and tasting lounge is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Section 18.08.030.010 (Alcoholic Beverage Sales – On and Off Sale) of the Code. 2. The beer and wine store and tasting lounge with on and off-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the proposed beer and wine store and tasting lounge is compatible with other commercial land uses within the area. 3. The size and shape of the site for the beer and wine store and tasting lounge with on and off-premises consumption of alcoholic beverages is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site is consistent with typical retail businesses that would be permitted as a matter of right within the C-G (General Commercial) and DMU (Downtown Mixed Use) Overlay Zone. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05713 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. - 4 - PC2014-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05713 and determines that the public convenience or necessity will be served by the issuance of a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages for on- and off-premises consumption at the Property, subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05713 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2013-00104 are approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05713 and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2013-00104 constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the findings hereinabove set forth. - 5 - PC2014-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2014. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a resolution of the City Council in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2014. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 6 - PC2014-*** - 7 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05713 AND PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2013-00104 (DEV2013-00124) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO BUILDING PERMIT ISSUANCE 1 All requests for new water services or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonment of existing water services and fire lines, shall be coordinated through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities- Water Engineering 2 Prior to issuance of Building Permits, Applicant shall contact water services Cross Connection Control staff to determine whether a backflow prevention device must be installed on the Applicant’s internal and external plumbing systems. Public Utilities- Water Engineering PRIOR TO FINAL OCCUPANCY 3 The premises shall be equipped with a comprehensive security alarm system (silent or audible) for the following coverage areas: perimeter building and access route protection and high valued storage areas within 120 days of this permit. A Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application must be completed, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation within 120 days of this permit. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Police Department 4 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device should be installed in solid doors where natural surveillance is compromised and any rear utility doors. The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn piece within 120 days of this permit. Police Department 5 Closed circuit television (CCTV) security cameras shall be installed with the following coverage areas: interior entrance, exterior entrance, general dining area, rear of restaurant and cashier’s area within 120 days of this permit. If security cameras are not monitored, signs indicating so should be placed at each camera. CCTV monitors and recorders should be Police Department - 8 - PC2014-*** secured in a separate locked compartment to prevent theft of, or tampering with, the tape. Digital and wireless CCTV security systems are highly recommended over older VHS or “Tape” recording systems. CCTV recordings should be kept for a minimum of 30 days before being deleted or recorded over. If used, CCTV videotapes should not be recorded over more than 10 items per tape. 6 Windows of restaurant shall not be covered by advertising to the extent that the interior is not clearly visible from the outside to enable officers responding to potential emergency situations to observe any activity which may be occurring inside. Police Department GENERAL CONDITIONS 7 Managers and/or owners are responsible for obtaining LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training from the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control for themselves and employees serving or selling alcohol. This program must be completed prior to the owner/manager/employee’s service or sales of alcoholic beverages. Police Department 8 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police/ Planning Department 9 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. Police Department 10 The business shall not be operated in such a way as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. (Section 4.16.100.010 Anaheim Municipal Code) Police Department 11 Petitioner shall not share any profits, or pay any percentage or commission to a promoter or any other person, based upon monies collected as a door charge, cover charge, or any other form of admission charge, including minimum drink orders, or the sale of drinks. Police Department - 9 - PC2014-*** 12 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. Police Department 13 Signs shall be posted at all entrance stating “No one under 21 allowed.” Police Department 14 The permitted activity shall not create sound levels, which violate any ordinance of the City of Anaheim. (Section 4.16.100.010 Anaheim Municipal Code) Police Department 15 No distilled spirits are allowed under this license. Police Department 16 There shall be no live entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premises at any time without issuance of proper permits as required by the Anaheim Municipal Code. Police Department 17 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 18 All activities related to the use shall occur indoors, except as may be permitted by an authorized Special Event Permit. Code Enforcement 19 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 20 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department 21 The beer and wine store and tasting lounge shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation as described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Operation and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department - 10 - PC2014-*** 22 The applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnities”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnities to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnities concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnities and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnities in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department 23 The premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to and reviewed and approved by the City of Anaheim, which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked as Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan) and Exhibit No. 2 (Floor Plan). Planning Department 280 S LEMON ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92805 714.369.WINE (9462) COLONYWINEMERCHANT.COM To Whom It May Concern, Thank you for the opportunity to apply for a Conditional Use Permit for the 280 S Lemon St retail location. We are excited about bringing our concept to the historical community of Anaheim. After some research we learned that there are no independent fine wine retailers or fine wine bars in the area. We have spoken with a number of residence, small business owners, city employees, Disney cast members, and visitors and many have said that they go to surrounding cities to purchase wine as well as to frequent wine bars. Colony Wine Merchant will be a fine wine retailer and tasting lounge that will celebrate community, sustainably farmed vineyards, family owned wineries and limited produced wines. We will have a great selection of wines (not found in grocery stores or chain retailers) available for retail, by the glass and taste. We will also offer a menu with a selection of cheese plates, small bites and sandwiches that will be prepared by our neighbors, The Center Street Cheese Shop. We will purchase prepared cheese plates and prepared sandwiches daily so we have them on hand when our guests order throughout the day. We will also serve nuts, crackers and bread to accompany the cheese plates. We will both work full time to be hands on and connect with our guests on a personal level. We will hire 4 wine loving employees that live in the area and have a connection with the locals. We feel this concept will enhance the community by keeping the Anaheim residence from going elsewhere to buy wine, and will give visitors a reason to stay in the area and enjoy a glass of wine after shopping on Center St or eating at the Packing House. The increased number of residence staying in the area to shop and consume as well as visitors are not not a detriment to the area as there is ample parking to accommodate new traffic. There are two parking structures on the Center St Promenade on either side of Lemon St. which are accessible via Center St or Oak St. There are also two CIM parking structures on Lemon St. South of Center St. One is directly across Colony Wine Merchant and the other is just next to Flame Broiler (next door). These parking structures offer 2 hours free parking to consumers shopping and dining in the downtown area. There is also 30 minute street parking right in front for those quick retail purchas es and 30 minute to 3 hour free parking on Center St. 280 S LEMON ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92805 714.369.WINE (9462) COLONYWINEMERCHANT.COM Our store front is one of only two possible store fronts on Lemon St north of Broadway, therefore the safety of pedestrians and /or drivers is not at risk due to increased traffic, as it will be minimal. Our fine wine concept is not created for high traffic, high energy, loud music or drunken behavior. We will have security cameras on the interior and exterior of the store to detour erratic behavior, theft and loitering. Our retail location is 1236 square feet and will be set up to accommodate fewer than 50 people at once, so it will be intimate. We will respect our neighbors and make sure to not disturb the residence of the Doria Lofts with loud activities or late hours. Our hours of operation will be Tuesday through Thursday 10:00am to 10:00pm, Friday and Saturday 11:00am to 10:00pm, Sundays 12:00pm to 9:00pm, closed Mondays. We are also open to suggestions regarding hours of operation to better promote the peace and quiet of our community. Our goal is to create a comfortable environment where conversation, community and wine education are the focus. We plan to welcome everyone as if they are entering our home where respect and hospitality are key. Our décor will be warm, classic and will be reminiscent of a downtown parlor of days gone by. Our walls will be adorned with old black and white photographs of Anaheim’s early settlers and vineyards. We want our store to reflect and celebrate the rich history of Anaheim and The Colony. Anaheim was home to California’s first wine growing region so there is a purpose for our choosing this location and much to celebrate! Thank you for the opportunity. Sincerely, Sonya Villegas Kelsen Mike Kelsen ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215 LOCATION: 3200 East Carpenter Avenue (Camelot Golfland) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Kenney Golf Enterprises, Inc. REQUEST: The applicant requests to amend a conditional use permit to allow a bumper boat attraction and charge a customer parking fee at the existing Camelot Golfland miniature golf facility. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1- Existing Facilities) and approving an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 1215. BACKGROUND: This 5.9-acre property is developed with a recreational facility consisting of four miniature golf courses, a water slide, a laser tag arena, an arcade, a go-cart track, a banquet hall and a restaurant. The property is located in the La Palma Core Area (Development Area 3) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan. The Property is designated for Office Low land uses in the Land Use Element of the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include the SR-91 freeway to the south; industrial buildings to the west and east; and a parking lot to the north. On January 13, 2014, the Commission continued the public hearing for this item for four weeks so that the request could be amended and re-noticed to reflect the fact that the applicant intends to charge a parking fee for customers who visit the Camelot Golfland facility. Previous Entitlements: Conditional Use Permit No. 1215 was approved by the City Council in 1971 to permit a miniature golf course. Five amendments were subsequently approved by the Planning Commission in 1991, 1993, 1999, 2009, and 2012. These amendments permitted the additions of a clubhouse, arcade, laser tag arena, water slide, and go cart track. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215 February 10, 2014 Page 2 of 3 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to replace an existing outdoor patio area in the center of the property with an approximately 4,850 square foot bumper boat pool attraction. The bumper boats would be battery operated. New walkways and wrought iron fencing would be constructed around the perimeter of the pool area. No physical changes are proposed to the four existing golf courses in order to accommodate the new attraction. No changes are proposed to the facility’s existing hours of operation, which are as follows: Monday-Thursday: 10:00 a.m. – 10:00 p.m. Friday: 10:00 a.m. – 12 midnight Saturday: 9:00 a.m. – 12 midnight Sunday: 11:00a .m. – 10:00 p.m. The applicant also proposes to charge a $5.00 parking fee for the customer parking lot on the north side of Carpenter Avenue. The parking fee is proposed to be implemented on Fridays and Saturdays from 6:30 p.m. to 12 a.m., and on Sundays from 4:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. This fee would be redeemable inside the facility for arcade tokens, or $5.00 off any single purchase, including food. To ensure that no parking spillover occurs on neighboring properties, the applicant proposes to provide a security guard to monitor surrounding properties during the hours when parking fees are being charged. The applicant also proposes to install signs at the entrance to the Camelot Golfland parking lot as well as the neighboring parking lot to the west indicating “No Camelot Parking,” close off the parking lot after business hours, and provide a maintenance crew to clean neighboring parking lots in the event that any trash is discarded in that area during the nights when parking fees are being charged. ANALYSIS: A Conditional Use Permit is required for outdoor commercial recreational facilities in this zone to determine compatibility with adjacent uses. The proposed bumper boat attraction is consistent with the operational characteristics of the recreational facility. The addition of this use is not expected to impact the business’s historic compatibility with surrounding land uses. A total of 275 parking spaces are provided for the recreational facility. This includes eight handicapped spaces adjacent to the main building and 267 spaces in the parking lot on the north side of Carpenter Avenue, which is also owned by the applicant. A parking demand analysis was submitted by the applicant to determine the facility’s overall parking demand since the Zoning Code does not contain parking requirements specific to this type of recreational facility. The applicant conducted parking counts on a Saturday afternoon during the recent Thanksgiving weekend, which is considered to be a peak period of parking demand. A maximum of 157 parking spaces were occupied during this time. These counts are consistent with prior parking counts completed in conjunction with past entitlement requests. The applicant indicates that this project will not substantially increase the parking demand because customers typically participate in multiple recreational venues during the same visit. Because the number of spaces provided is well above the maximum parking demand witnessed on past occasions, staff believes that there is an adequate amount of parking to accommodate the added use. AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215 February 10, 2014 Page 3 of 3 Staff received the attached letters from the adjacent property owners stating that several Camelot customers were parking in the adjacent business park to the west. According to these neighbors, these customers were parking on adjacent properties because a fee was being collected by the Camelot employees in the main parking lot, thereby encouraging off-site parking on the adjoining industrial properties. The collection of parking fees is not allowed under the existing conditional use permit and the operator of Camelot Golfland requests to amend the permit to allow the parking fee. Staff recommends approval of this request, provided that the applicant provides a security guard to monitor surrounding properties during the hours when parking fees are being charged. To ensure this takes place on an on-going basis, staff has included a condition of approval which requires security guards to patrol neighboring properties during these times. Staff also recommends a seven month Planning Commission review of this permit to be scheduled as a “Reports and Recommendations” item (after the peak summer season) to ensure that surrounding properties are not impacted by spillover parking by Camelot customers. CONCLUSION: The proposed bumper boat facility is consistent with the goals of the Northeast Area Specific Plan zone, which encourages a vibrant mix of industrial and commercial uses within the Anaheim Canyon area. The Camelot Golfland facility has operated at this location for several years in a manner that is compatible with surrounding uses. Staff recommends approval of the proposed use subject to the recommended conditions of approval designed to ensure neighborhood compatibility. Prepared by, Submitted by, David See Jonathan E. Borrego Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Previous Conditional Use Permit Resolution (November 19, 2012) 3. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 4. Applicant’s Project Description 5. Applicant’s Parking Analysis 6. Applicant’s Parking Fee Program 7. Neighbor’s Letters The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 8. Photographs 9. Plans SP 94-1DA3CAMELOTGOLFLAND SP 94-1DA3INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA3BUSINESS PARK SP 94-1DA5PARKING SP 94-1DA5AUTO SALVAGE YARD SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA1AUTO SALVAGE YARD SP 94-1DA5AGRICULTURE SP 94-1DA3OC SOCIALSERVICESAGENCY SP 94-1DA5BOWLING ALLEY SP 94-1DA5STERLINGBUSINESSCOMPLEX SP 94-1DA3BUSINESS PARK 9 1 F R E E W A Y91 F R E E W A Y E FR O N T E R A S TN SHEPARD STE C A R P E N T E R A V E E . L A P A L M A A V E N . T US T I N AVEE . M IR A L O M A A V E N. MI LLER STN. BLUE G U M STE. LA P ALMA AVE3 2 0 0 East Carpenter Avenu e D EV No. 2 0 13-00110 Subject Property APN: 345-111-08 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 12 9 1 F R E E W A Y91 F R E E W A Y E FR O N T E R A S TN SHEPARD STE C A R P E N T E R A V E E . L A P A L M A A V E N . T US T I N AVEE . M IR A L O M A A V E N. MI LLER STN. BLUE G U M STE. LA P ALMA AVE3 2 0 0 East Carpenter Avenu e D EV No. 2 0 13-00110 Subject Property APN: 345-111-08 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 12 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3 - 1 - PC2014-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2013-000110) (3200 EAST CARPENTER AVENUE) WHEREAS, on February 16, 1971, and subject to certain conditions of approval, the Anaheim City Council, by its Resolution No. 71R-65, did approve Conditional Use Permit No. 1215 to permit a miniature golf course facility (herein referred to as the "Original CUP") on that certain real property located at 3200 East Carpenter Avenue in the City of Anaheim, generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on January 15, 1991, the City Council, by its Resolution No. 91R-17, approved an amendment to the Original CUP to permit a water slide and expand the existing clubhouse and arcade for an existing amusement facility; and WHEREAS, on June 28, 1993, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission"), by its Resolution No. PC93-77, approved another amendment to the Original CUP to permit a children’s play area within an existing amusement facility; and WHEREAS, on March 15, 1999, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC99- 48, approved another amendment to the Original CUP to expand the clubhouse building, add a “Lasertag” facility, and relocate the children’s play area for an existing amusement facility; and WHEREAS, on June 22, 2009, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2009- 065, approved another amendment to the Original CUP to permit a children’s day care facility in conjunction with an existing amusement facility; and WHEREAS, on November 19, 2012, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2012-086, approved another amendment to the Original CUP to permit a go cart facility in conjunction with an existing amusement facility. The Original CUP, together with all of the aforementioned amendments thereto, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CUP"; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 1215C to amend the CUP to permit a bumper boat attraction and charge a customer parking fee in conjunction with an existing amusement facility, pursuant to Section 18.60.190 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") for the Property; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 5.9 acres in size and is developed with an amusement facility consisting of four miniature golf courses, a water slide, an arcade, a banquet hall, a restaurant, and a laser tag facility, commonly known as "Camelot Golfland". The Property is located in the La Palma Core Area (Development Area 3) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan Area (SP 94-1) and is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.120 (Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SP 94-1) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Code. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Office-Low land uses; and - 2 - PC2014-*** WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by Resolution No. 95R-134 and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 1215C, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The hearing was continued at the request of the applicant to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014 so that the request could be amended and re-noticed to allow the applicant to charge a parking fee for the customer parking lot; and WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is within that class of projects which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 1215C, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit a bumper boat facility is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Section 18.120.080.050.0502 (Amusement Park Facilities) of the Code under the conditions imposed. 2. The bumper boat facility, under the conditions imposed, will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the recreational facility will be compatible with the surrounding industrial uses in the area. 3. The size and shape of the site for the bumper boat facility is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the vehicular circulation is designed to minimize impacts on the surrounding businesses because visitors will enter the facility exclusively from Carpenter Avenue, which is lightly used industrial cul-de-sac street. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 1215C under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. - 3 - PC2014-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 1215C, subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. 1215C is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 1215C constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the findings hereinabove set forth. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that except as amended herein, all conditions of approval contained in Resolution Nos. 71R-65, 91R-17, PC93-77, PC99-48, PC2009-065 and PC2012- 086 shall remain in full force and effect. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2014. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a resolution of the City Council in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2014-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMIS SIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2014. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 5 - PC2014-*** - 6 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215C (DEV2013-00110) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY GENERAL CONDITIONS 1 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 2 The facility shall be operated in accordance with the Parking Analysis letters submitted as part of this application. This requirement includes the provision of security guards to patrol neighboring properties to ensure that surrounding properties are not impacted by spillover parking by Camelot customers during the hours when parking fees are being charged. Any changes to the business operation as described in said documents shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with said letters to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 3 The days and hours of operation for the customer parking fees shall be limited to Friday and Saturday from 6:30 p.m. to 12 a.m., and Sunday from 4:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. The hours of operation may be modified subject to prior review and approval by Planning Director. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 4 The customer parking fees shall be subject to a seven month review commencing from the date of this resolution. Planning Department staff will report back to the Planning Commission as a “Reports and Recommendations” (R&R) item on the status of the operation to ensure no impacts have been created associated with the parking fees. The owner shall pay for the cost of processing this R&R item. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 7 - PC2014-*** 5 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 6 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 4 CAMELOT GOLFLAND 3200 E. Carpenter Ave., CA 92806 - ph. (714) 630-3340 FAX (714) 630-0927 December 3, 2013 Planning Staff City of Anaheim - Planning Dept. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, Calif. 92805 Re: Camelot Golfland Bumper Boats – Parking information Dear Staff, In your November 20th letter, you asked if the bumper boat facility would serve our guests that are already at our facility or will it attract new guests. I do not think that anyone will come to our facility solely to ride the bumper boats. We see it as an additional fun activity that people will enjoy doing. It will cause people to stay longer. It may help to encourage additional people to come because of the “Mall Effect,” that is to say, because there are more fun things to do at one location. On our plans we show an additional parking demand of seven parking spaces. In your November 20th letter, you also asked us to count the cars in our parking lot on the busiest day of the week. We counted the cars our parking lot this last Saturday, November 30th. It was a very busy Thanksgiving holiday weekend day. The information is listed below: 1pm – 75 cars 2pm – 121 cars 3pm – 147 cars 4pm – 157 cars 5pm – 125 cars We have 275 parking spaces available in the parking lot. We do have ample parking. Thank you for considering our proposal. Please let us know if you need more information. Sincerely, Fred Kenney ATTACHMENT NO. 5 Kenney Golf Enterprises Inc. 3200 Carpenter Ave. Anaheim, CA 92806 January 10, 2014 Attn: David See & Planning Commission Anaheim City Hall 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: Proposed Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) No. 1215C (DEV2013-00110) Dear Mr. See and Planning Commission Members, As you have requested, here is our plan to address our neighbors concerns about our redeemable parking fee. 1. We are offering to improve the signage at the entrance of our neighbor’s property to better indicate it is not for Camelot’s parking. This would be done by reinforcing the signage that our neighbors already have in place, making it clear it is not Camelot’s parking. Also we would be willing to add some signage on the sidewalk at the entrance of our neighbor’s property to reinforce where Camelot’s parking is located. 2. We are offering to have our parking lot attendant monitor the sidewalk leading from Camelot to our neighbor’s property for Camelot’s customers so he/she can call the security guard to tell them to not use their parking lot. 3. On Saturday, Sunday, and Monday mornings, we are offering to have our maintenance go and clean the front of the properties of our neighbor’s buildings on Shepard Street. We would also be willing to take care of any graffiti issues that we are made aware of that occurred on Friday, Saturday, or Sunday nights. 4. If our neighbors are willing to mark their cars with stickers or similar indicator, we are offering to call the towing company that our neighbors have contracted with to remove any cars in violation. Thank you, Mauricio Ceron ATTACHMENT NO. 6 January 7, 2014 Attn: David See & Planning Commission Anaheim City Hall 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Proposed Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) No. 1215C (DEV2013-00110) Dear Mr. See & Planning Commission Members: I have been a property owner at Freeway Crossroads Business Park since its development in 2007. About a year ago, Camelot Golfland, located at 3200 East Carpenter Avenue in Anaheim started requiring a parking fee to be paid by their patrons, which has in turn has created a negative impact to the Freeway Crossroads Maintenance Corporation property. They have also blocked the exit to Shepard Street from their parking lot and I have seen cars almost drive off the curb, at night, as this is not well lighted. I assume this is to create a one entrance/exit so they can be sure to receive the parking charge. Several months ago, I personally went over to the people collecting the parking fee and asked if they question persons they see walking to Camelot from our business park. Their response was that they are not allowed to ask where people have parked but are only allowed to tell them that their parking lot is the only available parking. Specifically, on numerous occasions, I have personally seen patrons of Camelot Golfland park their vehicles within the Association property and walk to Camelot, which takes away available parking spaces and creates “wear and tear” on the asphalt. Additionally, these patrons have been seen throwing trash within the Association’s common area property, creating an unprofessional appearance and increasing costs for the Association. Additionally, my building is at the rear of the park, usually these people park near the business park entrance. We work odd hours, due to the nature of our business, and almost always work some part of the weekend. On several occasions there have been vehicles parking outside by building and 4 or 5 occupants, mostly male, are loitering around the vehicle causing me concern for my safety to leave my building for meals or to go home. I have called the police on several occasions due to this condition. This problem has only existed since Camelot has started charging for parking. ATTACHMENT NO. 7 In order to eliminate these problems, I am proposing that as a contingency for the proposed C.U.P., the City necessitate that Camelot Golfland remove their requirement for patrons to pay for parking, which drives visitors offsite, in turn creating unnecessary burdens for the Association and its members. Additionally, I believe that the exit to Shepard Street should be open, not only to make the parking lot more available to their own patrons but also for safety reasons. Should you have any questions, please call me at (714) 632-7200 to discuss this matter further. Respectfully, Winnie Houston, MAI Property Owner Freeway Crossroads Business Park January 7, 2014 Attn: David See & Planning Commission Anaheim City Hall 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 Re: Proposed Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) No. 1215C (DEV2013-00110) Dear Mr. See & Planning Commission Members: On behalf of the Freeway Crossroads Maintenance Corporation (i.e. “the Association”), please accept this letter as an official response to the Notice of Planning Commission Public Hearing on January 13, 2014. The Board of Directors and certain members of the Association would like to inform you that the noted property (known as Camelot Golfland) located at 3200 East Carpenter Avenue in Anaheim requires that a parking fee be paid by their patrons, which has in turn created a negative impact to the Freeway Crossroads Maintenance Corporation property. Specifically, on various occasions, owners within the Association have seen patrons of Camelot Golfland park within the Association property, which takes away available parking spaces & creates “wear and tear” on the asphalt. Additionally, these patrons have been seen throwing various pieces of trash within the Association’s common area property, creating an unprofessional appearance & increasing costs for the Association. Various safety concerns have also been reported related to these patrons trespassing over the Association’s property at night. In order to eliminate these concerns, the Association is proposing that as a contingency for the proposed C.U.P., the City necessitate that Camelot Golfland remove their requirement for patrons to pay for parking, which drives visitors offsite, in turn creating unnecessary burdens for the Association & its members. Should you have any questions, please call me at (714) 316-2877 to discuss this matter further. Sincerely, MAR WEST REAL ESTATE As Managing Agent on behalf of the Board of Directors for Freeway Crossroads Maintenance Corporation Nicole Egner, Association / Property Manager CDRE License #01899216 Exp 05/16/15 855 N. Shepard Street Anaheim, CA 92806 (714) 630-8666 January 7, 2014 David See & Planning Commission Anaheim City Hall 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, CA 92805 RE: Proposed Conditional Use Permit (C.U.P.) No. 1215C (DEV2013-00110) Dear Mr. See and Planning Commission Members, I am the owner of two properties immediately adjacent to Camelot Golfland Park. I am writing to you concerning the possible expansion of the park to include a bumper boat attraction. In the past, we have experienced a high volume of their patrons, mostly on weekends and holidays, parking in our spaces to avoid Camelot’s parking fee. This inevitably leads to loitering in our lots, littering and often criminal behavior. Our business park is not patrolled so we arrive in the morning to trash, graffiti, and even human waste. We feel that Camelot’s expansion would make a bad situation unbearable. We ask that if approved, that they have a plan in place to secure and patrol our adjoining business complex. Another option would be to drop their parking fee so patrons would not look elsewhere to park for free. Thank you for your consideration, Maureen and Jeff Cohen ATTACHMENT NO. 8 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 8 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650 VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 LOCATION: 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934 through 954 North Keystone Street (Servite High School). APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is James Carter representing the property owner, Servite High School. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to expand the existing Servite High School campus and to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under the school’s current conditional use permit. The requested action includes the following components: demolition of four adjacent single family homes; construction of a new aquatics center and parking lot; reorientation of the existing baseball field, including the installation of 30-foot high perimeter fencing and 10-foot high block walls; relocation of the music and weight room buildings; and, installation of replacement lighting for the running track and football field. The applicant is also requesting approval of a variance to construct the aquatics center with a setback from Keystone Street that is smaller than allowed by the Zoning Code, a variance to allow fences higher than permitted by Code and a variance to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the Code. Requested actions also include approval of a tentative parcel map to consolidate five parcels along Keystone Street into the main school campus property. On January 27, 2014, the Commission continued the public hearing for this item for two weeks so that the request could be amended and re-noticed to allow the applicant to retain an existing student enrollment of 950 students, whereas 850 students were permitted under previous entitlements. This request was also re-noticed to include a parking variance. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650, VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 February 10, 2014 Page 2 of 8 RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolutions, determining that a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request, and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650, Variance No. 2013-04957, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2013-133. BACKGROUND: This 14.5-acre property is developed with the Servite High School campus. The five properties on Keystone Street, to be consolidated into the campus, are developed with four single family homes and include a vacant parcel. The zoning for the high school property is Transition (T). The zoning for the single family homes is Single Family Residential (RS-2). The General Plan designates the school property for School land uses and the five residential properties for Low Density Residential land uses. The campus is surrounded by single family homes on all four sides. Prior Zoning Entitlements: Conditional Use Permit No. 922, to permit the expansion of an existing private high school, was approved by the Commission in 1967. Conditional Use Permit No. 3880, to permit a school expansion for a maximum of 850 students with less parking than required by Code was approved by the Commission in 1996. This permit was amended in 2002 to permit the construction of a new employee parking lot. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05104, to permit three additional modular classroom buildings, was approved by the Commission in 2007. PROPOSAL: Following is a summary of the individual components of the applicant’s request: Aquatics Center: The proposed aquatics center would be located where four single-family residences (934, 944, 950 and 954 North Keystone Street) and one vacant lot (940 North Keystone Street) currently exist. The properties are currently owned by the school and the existing homes would be demolished. Proposed hours for the aquatics complex are from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Water polo games and swim meets would be held after school on weekdays, and occasionally on Saturdays. These activities typically take place during the months of March through May, September and October. The aquatics center would include an Olym pic-size pool, bleachers for up to 450 spectators, and a pool equipment building. The back side of the 10-foot high bleacher wall would face Keystone Street. Layered landscaping and a “green screen” façade with planted vines are proposed on this wall as a means to screen the bleachers as viewed from the adjacent residential neighborhood. The pool building would include a locker room, equipment rooms, storage, and concession stand. Access to the complex would only be allowed through the main campus in order to discourage visitors from parking in the neighborhood. Lighting for evening use of the pool would be installed on four 60-foot high light poles that surround the pool. An 8-foot high block wall is proposed along the north boundary of the aquatics center site next to an adjoining residence. As further described below, this 8-foot high wall requires approval of a variance to allow this height. A front setback of 12 feet is proposed for the bleacher wall along Keystone Street where 25 feet is required; therefore, as further described below, a setback variance is required. A variance is also required for the proposed 8-foot high block wall adjacent to a single family residence on the north side of the aquatics center where Code permits a maximum height of 6 feet. A new employee-only parking lot with 25 spaces is proposed on the south side of the aquatics complex. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650, VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 February 10, 2014 Page 3 of 8 Baseball Field: The existing baseball field would be modified by relocating home plate to the southwest corner of the baseball field from its current location at the southeast corner. A new 10- foot high building would be built along the south property line and would include a team room, storage, restrooms, and a concession stand. Metal bleachers with a 460 seat capacity and a height of 11 feet would be installed behind home plate next to the south and west sides of the field. The bleachers would face away from the residential properties and would be covered with a sloped canopy roof. Field lighting would be installed on six poles ranging from 70 to 80 feet high: two poles along the south edge of the field, two poles along the west edge, and one pole each along the east and north edges. A 30-foot high mesh-type fence would be built along the right- and left-field edges of the baseball field to prevent balls from travelling into adjacent residential properties. Ten- foot high block walls would also be built along the south and west property lines to help attenuate noise. As further described below, a variance is required to allow the wall and fencing at the height proposed. Proposed hours for the baseball field are from 6:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., June through January, to accommodate practices and general physical education. Proposed field hours during baseball season, which runs from February through April, are from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. on weekdays. Baseball games typically start at 3:00 p.m. on weekdays; however, some games would also be scheduled on Saturdays. The field area would be cleaned up by school staff following each game and field lights would be turned off no later than 9:30 p.m. Football/Soccer/Track Field: The existing 30-foot high lights around the football field would be removed and replaced with new 70- to 80-foot high light poles. The purpose of the new lighting is to provide more consistent illumination across the field. The school operator does not propose to change any activities or events held at the campus as a result of light pole replacement. The school’s varsity football games would continue to be held off-site at Cerritos College. Proposed hours for the football field are from 6:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. These field lights would also be turned off no later than 9:30 p.m. Music and Weight Rooms: The project also includes the demolition of the existing swimming pool, music room, and weight room in the center of the campus. The music and weight rooms would be rebuilt on the site of the existing swimming pool. ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: The Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit for the expansion of the school campus in this zone. The purpose of the conditional use permit is to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential uses. Because the school is surrounded by single family homes adjacent to the areas to be modified, the proposed expansion project has been designed to minimize impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. For example, the applicant proposes to screen the rear of the bleachers facing Keystone Street with a “green screen,” consisting of an attached trellis with vines. To ensure that the enhanced athletic facilities do not impact the surrounding neighborhood, access to the aquatics complex and sports fields would be from the interior campus only in order to make it inconvenient for visitors to park in the surrounding neighborhood. Nighttime hours would be limited for all sporting events and all activity would end by 6:30 p.m. for the aquatics center and 9:30 p.m. for the sports fields so as to prevent late night noise and lighting impacts on the adjacent CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650, VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 February 10, 2014 Page 4 of 8 residences during late evening hours. Conditions of approval limiting such activities are included in the attached draft resolution. Fencing would be installed around the baseball field to prevent balls from leaving the field. In addition, block walls would be constructed adjacent to the single family homes to help attenuate noise. As further described in the Environmental Impact Review paragraph of this report, the applicant is also taking steps to minimize light glare impacts upon the adjacent residential community. Based on these design features and operational measures, staff recommends approval of this aspect of the requested conditional use permit. The applicant also proposes to retain a maximum student enrollment of 950 students, whereas 850 students were permitted under previous entitlements. According to the applicant, school enrollment has gradually increased to 950 students since the last school expansion occurred in 2007. Amending the previous limit to accommodate the current number of students would not impact current traffic or parking conditions as the applicant’s request would simply memorialize the current number of students. Staff recommends approval of this request. Setback Variance: A variance is being requested to permit a 12-foot setback for the aquatic bleacher wall where 25 feet is required adjacent to Keystone Street. The main high school campus is located in the T zone, but the aquatics complex is located in the RS-2 zone. The setback restrictions are based on its underlying RS-2 zone designation. This setback requirement, which typically applies to the development of residential structures, is intended to ensure that an appropriate open landscaped yard area is maintained between the public street and a residential structure. The bleacher wall proposed within this setback area is 10 feet in height, which is lower than the height of a typical home in this neighborhood and well within the 35-foot height limit allowed in this single-family residential zone. In addition, the 12-foot wide setback provided will be heavily landscaped which will minimize its visual impact upon the surrounding neighborhood. Staff believes that findings exist for the granting of the requested setback variance due to unique circumstances that apply to the RS-2 zoned properties along Keystone Street. These properties are unique in that their applicable development standards are intended to address the development of residential structures. This residential standard limits the applicant’s ability to build a 10-foot high bleacher wall that would be lower than the height of a typical one-story residence. Although encroaching into a required setback area, the height and proposed landscape treatment of the bleacher wall will ensure that it does not degrade the visual appearance of the surrounding neighborhood. Based on these reasons, staff recommends approval of this setback variance request. Fence/Wall Height Variance: The 30-foot high baseball field fencing and eight to 10-foot high block walls proposed adjacent to the single family homes are taller than the six foot height permitted by Code. Although taller than permitted by Code, the proposed fencing is designed to ensure that foul ball and noise impacts are minimized. Staff believes that findings exist for the granting of the requested fence/wall height variance due to the unique circumstance created by the school’s location in the middle of a residential neighborhood. Because the school property is completely surrounded by residential uses, the height of perimeter fencing is limited to six feet. However, a six foot high fence located along the south and west property lines would expose the adjacent residential properties to noise and physical impacts that would be greatly reduced by providing a taller screening structure. Due to this unique circumstance, staff recommends approval of the fence/wall height variance request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650, VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 February 10, 2014 Page 5 of 8 Parking Variance: A parking variance was approved by the Commission in 1996, in conjunction with a prior school expansion. At that time, 559 spaces were required and 304 spaces were proposed. This permit was amended in 2002 to permit the construction of a new employee parking lot with 30 additional spaces along Dogwood Avenue. Because the current application includes a request for 100 additional students at the school, a total of 16 additional parking spaces are required by Code. A parking variance is being requested by the applicant to provide less parking than required by Code as 575 spaces are required and 344 spaces are proposed. To address the parking variance, the IBI Group prepared a Parking Study, dated November 2012, which is included as Appendix E of the Initial Study (Attachment 7 of this report). The study indicates that the school currently provides 319 off-street parking spaces for an existing student enrollment of 950 students. A parking survey was conducted on Thursday, October 18, 2012 from 6 a.m. to 6 p.m. to determine peak demand. The survey concluded that a peak demand of 317 spaces, or 99 percent of the spaces available, occurred at 12:00 p.m. To confirm IBI’s findings, The Planning Center (TPC) conducted an additional parking survey on Wednesday, August 21, 2013 (the first week of the fall semester) at 11:30 a.m., when, according to the parking study, parking demand is at its highest peak. This survey also analyzed parking counts at 4 p.m., when events at the aquatics center would typically occur. The survey concluded that the school currently experiences a parking shortage of 12 spaces during normal school hours and there is evidence of a parking spillover in the adjoining neighborhood. To address the deficiency, the school proposes to add a 25-space parking lot next to the south end of the aquatics center, thereby increasing total school parking capacity from 319 to 344. Although this lot would be for employees only, these employees currently use parking spaces within the student lot, so the new lot would free up these spaces for student use. The applicant also submitted a parking management plan to minimize spillover parking into the surrounding neighborhood. The plan includes the following operational measures which are included as conditions of approval: Current Measures  Shuttle service – Servite provides a daily shuttle service to south Orange County to transport students to and from the school each day.  Faculty carpool/bike program – Servite faculty members are offered pay incentives to carpool or bike to work.  Parking permits are limited to junior and senior students only. Permits are not issued for sophomore students who may be of driving age.  Cars are allowed to be double parked in the student lot on street sweeping days. Proposed Measures  Construct a new 25 space staff parking lot. Currently nine coaches and four staff members park in the existing student parking lot. This new lot would open up an additional 13 spaces in the student lot and allow for 12 additional spaces to be available for staff members.  Shuttle Service - two additional routes will be added next school year. These shuttle vans can accommodate up to 7 students each, for a total 21 students.  Student Carpool program – Servite will offer tuition and/or lunch incentives to Juniors and Seniors who carpool to school.  Servite will add 10 bike racks to encourage students and faculty to bicycle to the campus. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650, VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 February 10, 2014 Page 6 of 8 The swimming events would occur outside of normal school hours in afternoons and on weekends; thus, the aquatics center would not add to parking demands at the school. Baseball events would be scheduled after school hours on weekdays and at various times on Saturdays. With the addition of the lights at the baseball field, evening baseball games and practices could be accommodated when the on-site parking spaces are not being occupied by students and faculty during regular school hours. The TPC study concludes that baseball games are not large spectator events and would not impact parking during this period. In addition, home football games are played at Cerritos College and would continue to be played there after development of the proposed improvements. Based upon the conclusions of the parking analysis, the project would not generate a parking demand above the proposed parking supply of 344 spaces; therefore, staff recommends approval of the parking variance. Tentative Parcel Map: The consolidation of the residential and school properties requires the approval of a tentative parcel map. The complete findings are included in the attached draft resolution. Planning Commission review of the proposed tentative parcel map is required to ensure that the project site is physically suitable for subdivision. The proposed parcel map would allow for the consolidation of the five residential parcels into the main campus property. The proposed subdivision is consistent with the City’s Zoning Code; therefore, staff recommends approval of the proposed parcel map. Environmental Impact Review: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) has been prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the project and to identify necessary mitigation measures. The MND was circulated for a 30-day public review period between December 16, 2013 and January 17, 2014. No comments were received during this 30-day review period. Mitigation measures have been identified in the MND and a Mitigation Monitoring Program has been prepared and is recommended for adoption by the Planning Commission to ensure that the mitigation measures identified in the MND are implemented. These measures are included in the draft resolution attached to this report. With implementation of these measures, the following project impacts will be reduced to a level considered less than significant. The MND concludes that there are no remaining potentially significant adverse impacts related to the project. Lighting: The proposed project includes the installation of lights for evening events at the new aquatics center, the reoriented baseball field and at the football field/running track. The heights of the light poles at the aquatics center would be 60 feet and the lights at the baseball field would be between 70 and 80 feet in height. The proposed heights of two northern and two southern light poles at the football field are 70 feet and 80 feet, respectively. These light poles would replace eight existing poles that are 30 feet in height. The MND concludes that light and glare impacts on the Wichita Street residences which face the football field would not be significant. These residences should experience a reduction in the glare they now experience from the portable lights used for evening football practice because the increased mounting heights of the proposed lights allow the lamps to be directed down to the playing surface and not at a right angle across the field. The new lights are designed to substantially reduce the direct view and glare of the existing football field lights upon adjacent residences. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650, VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 February 10, 2014 Page 7 of 8 A lighting study of the proposed lights was prepared by Musco Sports Lighting and is included as Appendix B of the attached Initial Study. Based on the lighting analysis, spillover lighting would be above the 2.0 foot candle (fc) threshold along six residences located adjacent to the baseball field. Foot candle is a unit of measure of the intensity of light falling on a surface. For comparison purposes, a gas station canopy can produce up to 30 fc and a typical street light can produce between 1.0 and 5.0 fc. As indicated in the Initial Study, a general benchmark for maximum light levels adjacent to a residential property is 2.0 fc. To address this issue, the school proposes the following mitigation measures pertaining to these six properties: • Servite High School shall provide an offer to fund blinds, shutters or other means acceptable to the homeowners to block spillover light from entering ball field-facing windows. This offer shall be made to the homeowners 60 days prior to the first lighting of the field and payment made at least 30 days prior to this lighting. A homeowner’s refusal to accept payment shall not be considered Servite’s failure to accomplish this mitigation requirement. A condition of approval requiring the submittal of such documentation to the City is included in the attached draft resolution. The mitigation payment shall not exceed $2,000 per impacted residence. • This mitigation applies to the following addresses, or as revised pursuant to the final lighting plans: 930, 924, 920, 914 and 910 N. Keystone Street and 1939 W. Catalpa Avenue. • After initial completion, each light and shield affixed on the pole shall be situated and adjusted so that lighting levels on residential property lines are minimized and are in compliance with the final detailed lighting plans submitted to the City. After the appropriate burn-in time for the lights, Servite High School shall take measurements to confirm these levels have been achieved and submit same to the City of Anaheim Planning Department. A condition of approval requiring the submittal of such documentation to the City is included in the attached draft resolution. • Servite High School shall program evening use so that the aquatic center and baseball field lights are off by 7:00 p.m. and 9:30 p.m., respectively, consistent with the Event Management Plan. These restrictions allow the lights to remain on one-half hour following the end of programmed events to allow for orderly exiting and facility clean up. Noise: Typical noise sources associated with the project include spectator noise from swimming events and baseball games, as well as use of the batting cages during practices. The Initial Study analyzed future noise levels from the campus expansion project by using a database of recreation noise sources and acoustical modeling to simulate the proposed uses. Noise generated by the aquatics complex and baseball facility operations would be below the City’s noise standard of 60 dBA as measured at the property line. Therefore, the initial study concludes that noise from the expansion project would not impact the surrounding residential properties and would be less than significant. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650, VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 February 10, 2014 Page 8 of 8 Neighborhood Outreach: The applicant hosted a community meeting with neighborhood residents on June 11, 2013. Approximately 15 neighbors attended the meeting. The applicant provided a comprehensive overview of the project to the neighbors. The neighbors expressed a few minor concerns regarding existing conditions around the property, such as traffic and parking, but did not express any concerns about the proposed expansion project. Staff received two letters of support from adjacent neighbors. One letter of opposition was also received from an adjacent neighbor; this neighbor expressed concerns regarding frequent events occurring at the football field during weeknights and weekends. These letters are included as Attachment No. 6 to the staff report. CONCLUSION: The proposed development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code. Servite High School is an asset to the community and the proposed school expansion project has been designed to minimize impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit, variance, and tentative parcel map requests. Prepared by, Submitted by, David See Jonathan E. Borrego Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution 3. Draft Tentative Parcel Map Resolution 4. Applicant’s Project Description 5. Applicant’s Parking Analysis 6. Neighbor’s Letters The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 7. Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration/Technical Studies 8. Photographs 9. Plans TSERVITEHIGH SCHOOL RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TPRESCHOOL RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4LA HACIENDAAPTS9 DU RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RM-4FOURPLEX RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RM-3DETACHED CONDOS137 DU RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE W LA PAL M A AVE W CATALPA AVEN FAIRVIEW STN WICHITA STN CHIPPEWA AVEN KEYSTONE STW DOG WOOD AV E W DOG WOOD AV E W FALMOUTH AVE W. LA PALMA AVE N. EUCLID STN. BROOKHURST STN. LOARA STW. ROMNEYA DR 1 9 5 2 Wes t La Palma Avenue934-9 54 North Key stone Street D E V N o. 2012-00053 Subject Property APN: 072-131-01072-463-06072-463-05072-463-03072-463-02072-463-04 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 12 W LA PAL M A AVE W CATALPA AVEN FAIRVIEW STN WICHITA STN CHIPPEWA AVEN KEYSTONE STW DOG WOOD AV E W DOG WOOD AV E W FALMOUTH AVE W. LA PALMA AVE N. EUCLID STN. BROOKHURST STN. LOARA STW. ROMNEYA DR 1 9 5 2 Wes t La Palma Avenue934-9 54 North Key stone Street D E V N o. 2012-00053 Subject Property APN: 072-131-01072-463-06072-463-05072-463-03072-463-02072-463-04 ATTA CHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Pho to:May 20 12 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2014-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650 AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2012-00053) (1952 WEST LA PALMA AVENUE AND 934-954 NORTH KEYSTONE STREET) WHEREAS, on March 9, 1967, and subject to certain conditions of approval, the Anaheim Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Planning Commission"), by its Resolution No. PC67-42, did approve Conditional Use Permit No. 922 to permit the expansion of an existing private school on that certain real property located at 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934-954 North Keystone Street in the City of Anaheim, generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on September 8, 1988, the Anaheim Zoning Administrator, by its Resolution No. ZA88-53, approved Variance No. 3833 to permit an existing patio cover with waiver of minimum structural setback; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 1996, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC96- 30, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3824 to permit a baseball storage room at an existing private high school; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 1996, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC96-119, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3880 to permit a new 2-story classroom addition and remodel an existing classroom building in conjunction with an existing private school with waivers of maximum structural height and minimum number of parking spaces. On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2002-142, approved an amendment to this permit to construct a new parking lot on two adjoining single family residential zoned lots; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 1999, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC99-181, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 4154 to permit a freestanding electronic readerboard sign in conjunction with an existing private high school; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2006, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2006- 60, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05104 to permit two modular classroom buildings in conjunction with the existing private high school. On August 20, 2007, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2007-101, approved an amendment to this permit to permit an additional modular classroom building; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements and to expand the existing Servite High School campus to include the demolition of four single family homes, construction of a new aquatics center and parking lot, reorientation of the existing baseball field with 30-foot high fencing and 10-foot high block - 2 - PC2014-*** walls, relocation of the music and weight room buildings, replacement lighting for the track and football field, and consolidation of the five parcels along Keystone Street into the main school campus property and Variance No. 2013-04957 to permit a reduced front yard setback along Keystone Street, fencing that is higher than permitted by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the “Code”), and less parking than required by Code (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project"), pursuant to Section 18.60.190 of the Code for the Property; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 15.8-acres in size and is developed with the Servite High School campus. The five properties on Keystone Street to be consolidated into the campus are developed with four single family homes and a vacant parcel. The zoning for the high school property is Transition (T). The zoning for the residential parcels are Single Family Residential (RS-2). The General Plan designates the school property for School land uses and the five residential properties for Low Density Residential land uses; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by Resolution No. 95R-134 and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 and Variance No. 2013-04957, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith. The hearing was continued at the request of the applicant to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014 so that the request could be amended and re-noticed to allow the applicant to retain an existing student enrollment of 950 students, whereas 850 students were approved under previous entitlements; this request was also re-noticed to include a parking variance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, and because the Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") was prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. Moreover, the City provided a notice of intent to adopt the MND in accordance with the requirements of Section 15072 of the CEQA Guidelines. The MND was circulated for a 30-day public review period from December 16, 2013 through January 17, 2014. A complete copy of the Initial Study and MND is on file and can be viewed in the City's Planning Department and is also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a Mitigation Monitoring Program ("MMP") has been prepared for the proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the proposed Project; and - 3 - PC2014-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on February 10, 2014 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of the MND and for and against the proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the Planning Commission did not receive evidence and reports, including any written and verbal comments received during the public review period concerning the contents and sufficiency of the MND and responses thereto; and WHEREAS, based upon a review of the Proposed Project and the MND, the MMP and the Initial Study, this Planning Commission has considered the proposed MND, together with any comments and responses received during the public review process, and finds on the basis of the whole record before it that (i) the MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; (ii) potentially significant impacts of the proposed Project have been eliminated or reduced to a level considered less than significant with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the MMP; and (iii) there is no substantial evidence that the Proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit the proposed Project is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Sections 18.04.030.010 and 18.14.030.010 (Educational Institutions–General) of the Code. 2. The proposed Project will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Proposed Project has been designed to be compatible with surrounding residential uses and mitigation measures have been included to reduce or eliminate and potential adverse impacts. 3. The size and shape of the site for the proposed Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the vehicular circulation is designed to minimize impacts on the surrounding properties. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. - 4 - PC2014-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for and Variance No. 2013-04957 for a reduced front setback, less parking than required by Code, and maximum fence height should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.04.100.010 Minimum front setback. (25 feet required; 12 feet proposed) SECTION NO. 18.42.040.00 Minimum number of parking spaces. (575 spaces required; 344 spaces proposed) SECTION NO. 18.46.110.030 Maximum Fence Height. (6 feet high permitted; 8 to 30 feet high proposed) 1. There are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because unique circumstances apply to the properties along Keystone Street. These properties are unique in that the RS-2 zone development standards, including the applicable setback and fence height requirements, are intended to address the development of residential structures. These residential standards limit the applicant’s ability to build a 10-foot high bleacher wall that would be lower than the height of a typical one-story residence. Although encroaching into a required setback area, the height and proposed landscape treatment of the bleacher wall will ensure that it does not degrade the visual appearance of the surrounding neighborhood. In addition, unique circumstances apply to the requested fence/wall height variance due to the school’s location in the middle of a residential neighborhood. Because the school property is completely surrounded by residential uses, the height of perimeter fencing is limited to six feet. However, a six foot high fence located along the south and west property lines would expose the adjacent residential properties to noise and physical impacts that would be greatly reduced by providing a taller screening structure. 2. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use because parking demand studies were prepared by IBI Group and The Planning Center determining that the proposed number of parking spaces within the school campus would be sufficient to accommodate all of the uses on the site, including the new 25 space parking lot to be constructed adjacent to the proposed aquatic center. In addition, the school proposes to implement a parking management plan to prevent spillover parking into the surrounding neighborhood. 3. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking within the school will adequately accommodate the peak parking demands of the proposed expansion and the other uses on the site; and - 5 - PC2014-*** 4. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking for the school will adequately accommodate peak parking demands of all uses on the site; and 5. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the property and are designed to allow for adequate on-site circulation; and 6. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are designed to allow adequate on-site circulation, and therefore will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the school. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby adopt the MND and the MMP, which documents shall remain on file with the City's Planning Division, which shall act as the custodian of records for said documents and the record of the proceedings upon which its decision is based. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 and Variance No. 2013-04957 for the Property, subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 and Variance No. 2013-04957 are approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 and Variance No. 2013-04957 constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that they comply with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 6 - PC2014-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the findings hereinabove set forth. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the conditions of approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B amend and hereby replaces in their entirety the previous conditions of approval contained in Resolution Nos. PC67-42, ZA88-53, PC96-30, PC96-119, PC99-181, PC2002-142, PC2006-60 and PC2007-101; therefore, the conditions of approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B shall control and govern the Property. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2014. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a resolution of the City Council in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 7 - PC2014-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2014. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 8 - PC2014-*** - - 9 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650 AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 (DEV2012-00053) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 1 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering Division 2 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering Division 3 The owner shall submit detailed lighting plans demonstrating light levels (horizontal and vertical) along adjacent residential property lines. Light levels that exceed 2.0 footcandles at any portion of a residential property line shall trigger the following offers: • Servite High School shall provide an offer to fund blinds, shutters or other means acceptable to the homeowners to block spillover light from entering ballfield-facing windows. This offer shall be made to the homeowners 60 days prior to and payment made at least 30 days prior to the first lighting of the field. A homeowner’s refusal to accept payment shall not be considered Servite’s failure to accomplish this mitigation requirement. Any written documentation pertaining to this mitigation measure shall be provided to the Planning Department. • The mitigation payment shall not exceed $2,000 per impacted residences. • This mitigation applies to the following addresses, or as revised pursuant to the final lighting plans: 930, 924, 920, 914 and 910 N. Keystone and 1939 W. Catalpa Avenue. • After initial completion, each luminaire and shields affixed on the pole shall be situated and adjusted so that lighting levels on residential property lines are minimized and are compliance with the final detailed lighting plans submitted to the City. After the appropriate burn-in time for the lights, Servite High School shall take measurements to confirm these levels have been achieved and submit same to the Planning Department. Planning Department - 10 - PC2014-*** MM Aesthetics 1 4 Servite High School shall program evening use of the aquatic center and baseball field so that lights are turned off by 7:00 p.m. and 9:30 p.m., respectively, consistent with the Event Management Plan. Planning Department 5 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: • The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. • Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. • Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. • A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. MM Cultural Resources 2 Planning Department 6 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: • The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. • Specimens that are collected prior to or during the Planning Department - 11 - PC2014-*** grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. • Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. MM Cultural Resources 3 7 The building shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or audible). Police Department 8 Any necessary address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers should be visible during hours of darkness. Police Department 9 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Police Department 10 The rear doors of the premises shall be numbered with the same address numbers or suite number of the business. Minimum height of 4 inches is recommended. Police Department 11 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. Police Department 12 All backflow eq uipm ent shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area i n a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any ot h er large water system equipment shall be in sta lled to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of t he street setback area in a manner fu ll y screened from all pu blic streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on pl ans a nd ap proved by Water Engineeri ng and Cross Connection Co ntrol Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 13 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modi ficat ions, relocations, or abandonments of exist ing water services, backflow equi pment, and fire lines, shall be coo rdinated and permitted through Water Engineering Di vision of t he Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 14 This is a p roject wit h a landscaping area exceeding 2,500 square feet. A Landscape Documentation Package and a Public Utilities - 12 - PC2014-*** Cert ification of Co mpletion are required and a separate irrigation meter shall be in stalled in compliance wi th Chapter 10.19 of Anaheim Municipal Code and Ordinance No. 6160 relating to la ndscape water efficiency. Department, Water Engineering Division 15 All exis ti ng water services an d fire services s h a ll conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use if necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. Th e owner/d evel oper shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 16 The owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City (i) an easement for all large domestic above ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad, (ii) a twenty foot wide easement for all water service laterals to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls, or other landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair, or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement, and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the owner and included and recorded. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 17 The owner shall submit to the Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 18 The existing 4-inch backflow prevention device on the 4-inch water meter and the existing 4-inch backflow on the 4-inch service serving the property are substandard and shall be replaced. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 19 Unless the owner intends to use them, the owner shall abandon all existing water services to address 934-954 N. Keystone Street at the City main per City standards. Public Utilities Department, Water - 13 - PC2014-*** Engineering Division 20 There exists a capped municipal water well approximately five feet below the finished surface at 938 N. Keystone Street. The owner shall comply with State and City requirements when excavating in the vicinity of the capped well. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 21 Trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage areas shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets or highways. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from graffiti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum 1-gallon size clinging vines planted on maximum 3-foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Public Works-Streets and Sanitation Division 22 Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval a Water Quality Management Plan that conforms to current Orange County Guidelines and Requirements as well as the City’s WQMP Review Checklist. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 23 Str eet improvement plans shall be submitted for all parkway related improvements adjacent to the project site to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division for review and approval. These plans shall show both sides of all streets and alleys ad jacent to the property, including all driveways and utility i nstallations, signing and striping. Parkway landscaping shall be irrigated from the on-site water main. All improvements shall be installed and completed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 24 A bond securing the completion of the public improvements shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney. Public Works Department, Development Services Division PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 25 Ongoing during construction of the project, all construction traffic shall use La Palma Avenue to access and egress the site. No construction traffic shall use residential streets, except for street improvements that may be necessary on Keystone Street. Public Works Department, Development Services Division - 14 - PC2014-*** 26 All required WQMP items shall be inspected and operational. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 27 An all-weather access road as approved by the Fire Department shall be provided during construction. Fire Department GENERAL CONDITIONS 28 The maximum school enrollment shall not exceed 950 students. Planning Department 29 The school shall be operated in accordance with the two parking studies, prepared by the IBI Group and The Planning Center, and the Parking Management Plan, prepared by the applicant, that were submitted as part of this application. Any changes to these plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with these documents to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department 30 Access to the aquatic complex and sports fields shall be from the interior campus only. Planning Department 31 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Police Department 32 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 33 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 34 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure Planning Department - 15 - PC2014-*** to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. 35 The Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department 36 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3 - 1 - PC2014-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2012-00053) (1952 WEST LA PALMA AVENUE AND 934-954 NORTH KEYSTONE STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified Petition for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2013-133 to consolidate five residential parcels into the main Servite High School campus property (the "Proposed Project"), for those certain real properties located at 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934-954 North Keystone Street in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2013-133 is proposed in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 and Variance No. 2013-04957; and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 15.8-acres in size and is developed with the Servite High School campus. The five properties on Keystone Street to be consolidated into the campus are developed with four single family homes and a vacant parcel. The zoning for the high school property is Transition (T). The zoning for the residential parcels are Single Family Residential (RS-2). The General Plan designates the school property for School land uses and the five residential properties for Low Density Residential land uses; and WHEREAS, on January 27, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by Resolution No. 95R-134 and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2013-133, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith, and the hearing was continued to the February 10, 2014 meeting so that the request could be amended and re-noticed to allow the applicant to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements and include a parking variance; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") was prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the proposed Project. The MND was circulated for a 30-day public review period from December 16, 2013 through January 17, 2014. A complete copy of the MND is on file and can be viewed in the City's Planning Department and is also available for purchase; and - 2 - PC2014-*** WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a Mitigation Monitoring Program ("MMP") has been prepared for the proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on February 10, 2014 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of the MND and for and against the proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, the Planning Commission did not receive evidence and reports, including any written and verbal comments received during the public review period concerning the contents and sufficiency of the MND and responses thereto; and WHEREAS, based upon a review of the Project and the MND, this Planning Commission finds that (i) the MND reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City; (ii) it has considered the proposed MND and MMP together with any comments and responses received during the public review process; (iii) potentially significant impacts of the proposed Project have been eliminated or reduced to a level considered less than significant with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in the resolution; and (iv) there is no substantial evidence that the proposed Project will have a significant effect on the environment; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the Proposed Project, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed tentative parcel map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the School and Low Density Residential land use designations of the Anaheim General Plan and the Single Family Residential and Transition zone development standards contained in Chapters 18.04 (Single Family Residential Zone) and 18.14 (Public and Special Purpose Zones) of the Code; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the type and size of the Proposed Project; and 3. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. No sensitive environmental habitat has been identified on the Property; and 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since any new structures and associated improvements will be constructed on the Property in compliance with requirements of the Code; and 5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. - 3 - PC2014-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2013-133, subject to and contingent upon the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 and Variance No. 2013-04957, now pending, and upon satisfaction of the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 10, 2014. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Section 17.08.104 of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2014-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 10, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2014. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 5 - PC2014-*** - 6 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013-133 (DEV2012-00053) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL 1 The legal property owner shall execute a Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to complete the required public improvements at the legal property owner’s expense. Said agreement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Subdivision Section approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim an easement 30 feet in width from the street centerline of Keys tone Street for road, public utilities and other public purposes. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section and approved by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of private facilities, including compliance with approved the Water Quality Management Plan, and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance responsibilities shall include parkway landscaping and irrigation on the public streets. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. Public Works Department, Development Services Division GENERAL 4 A parcel map shall be submitted for review and approval to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department, Development Services Division and the Orange County Surveyor and then shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 5 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnities”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnities to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnities concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnities and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 7 - PC2014-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnities in connection with such proceeding. 6 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 7 Subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 From:Melissa Schulze To:David See Subject:Servite Expansion Date:Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:30:24 PM Mr. See, we have lived in our home for 34 years. The first half of that time, Servitewas a sleepy neighborhood school. The priests and nuns were friendly and we feltlike we were all part of the same community. Our street was so quiet that drivingschools taught parallel parking on it. About 12+ years ago, that all started tochange. The football field was being used every Saturday and many Sundays. TheCorona Chargers had the Servite Courage Field listed as their home field up until a few years ago and every Saturday all day long our street had no parking and we listened to ref whistles and cheering and air horns all day long. It took many calls and a lot of effort to the City to get that changed and now the Corona Chargers play in Corona. They were soon replaced by a men's soccer league who played everySunday. That also took a lot of effort to get changed. Rosary uses the field as welland weekend tournaments are held there. Once a year the school allows theirfootball players to spend the night on the football field. Several years ago there wasa film crew filming a football scene on the football field until 11:30 pm. The Citypermit use for the football field is listed as: "Occasional night and weekend use IF itis school related". The football field is used EVERY night until 8:30 - 9 pm during the week and regularly on Saturdays and occasionally on Sundays and it is rented out on occasion for non-school related events. We will come home from running errands on Saturday or church on Sunday and open our doors and windows to enjoy a nap and a lazy afternoon/evening and the next thing we know our street is packed with carsand there is some event taking place on the football field, there is an announcer onthe loudspeaker, music booming, etc. I spoke with Kimberly Wong several times in2006 and she explained to me that the planning commission had envisioned a smallschool in the middle of a small neighborhood and that the City is as much for theneighborhood as it is for the school. Ms. Wong was very helpful and veryprofessional. After that John Ramirez was assigned to Servite and our neighborhood and he seemed to be very pro Servite and not concerned about the neighborhood and I have logged many statements he made to me to back that up. After that we started calling Code Enforcement and were able to get the complaints linked into one file and the football field permit reviewed. I do think it has slowed down therenting out of the field but Servite still uses it every night and most weekends. Alongwith that comes the fact that we have no parking at night or on the weekends. Ispoke with Traffic and they said they are very aware of the problem and that ourneighborhood is on the top 10 list in the City for problem parking. Our children comefor Sunday dinner at our home and there is no parking. To summarize, we are asking that the permit for the football field be enforced AND, if the school is going to expand and have more students than they were supposed to have, that Servite include a parking structure in their expansion plans. It is absolutely egregious on the part of the City to not be more concerned about theimpact to the neighborhood. I have friends in Buena Park and Corona and they don'tallow certain types of parking in the neighborhoods. We are taxpayers/homeownersand we should be able to have parking on our streets and some peaceful momentsto enjoy our yards and good weather. A friend on Keystone told me several yearsago that she has a very difficult time even finding a place to put her trash barrels ontrash day. Thank you very much for giving us a forum to express our concerns. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 From:Marc Woods To:David See Subject:Servite High School Date:Tuesday, January 21, 2014 11:57:06 AM Mr. See, We live in a house located across the street from Servite High School at 918 N. Wichita Street in Anaheim. We received a notice of the upcoming Planning Commission Public Hearing on and would like to go on record as being one hundred percent in support of the proposed project that Servite has on the table. Servite has been an excellent neighbor and we would like to do anything possible to help them in their continued future success. Their campus offers a tremendous amount of benefits for our community and any additions should be encouraged. We support the proposed project of Servite High School and hope that the Planning Commission will approve of it on . Thank you. Marc & Dale Woods Residents January 27, 2014 January 27, 2014 From:Richard Julian To:David See Subject:Servite submission. Date:Wednesday, January 15, 2014 1:43:29 PM Reference the submission by Servite High School Mr. See, I am the owner of the house located across the street from Servite High School at 910 N. Wichita Street in Anaheim. I received a notice of the upcoming Planning Commission Public Hearing on January 27, 2014 and would like to go on record as being one hundred percent in support of the proposed project that Servite has on the table. Servite has been an excellent neighbor and I would like to do anything possible to help them in their continued future success. Their campus offers a tremendous amount of benefits for our community and any additions should be encouraged. I support the proposed project of Servite High School and hope that the Planning Commission will approve of it on January 27, 2014. Thank you. Richard Julian President Advanced Real Estate Services, Inc 15320 Barranca Pkwy | Suite 100 | Irvine | CA | 92618 O: 949.595.5900 | F: 949.595.5901 rjulian@advancedonline.com| www.advancedonline.com CA Broker Lic #00881503 This communication is confidential and may contain information or material that is proprietary, legally privileged and/or otherwise protected by law (all such rights and protections being expressly reserved hereby). If you have received it in error or if you are not the intended recipient, please immediately notify the sender by return message and permanently delete the message, including any attachments, and destroy any printed copies. Any unauthorized use, copying or dissemination of this communication is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Thank you. ARES, Inc. operating under California License # 00881503 MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION AND INITIAL STUDY FOR: SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT prepared for: CITY OF ANAHEIM Contact: David See Senior Planner prepared by: THE PLANNING CENTER|DC&E Contact: Dwayne Mears, AICP Principal, School Facilities Planning DECEMBER 2013 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 INITIAL STUDY FOR: SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PROJECT prepared for: CITY OF ANAHEIM 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 714.765.4948 Contact: David See Senior Planner prepared by: THE PLANNING CENTER|DC&E 3 MacArthur Place, Suite 1100 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Tel: 714.966.9220  Fax: 714.966.9221 E-mail: information@planningcenter.com Website: www.planningcenter.com Contact: Dwayne Mears, AICP Principal, School Facilities Planning COA-60.0E DECEMBER 2013 Table of Contents Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page i Section Page 1. INTRODUCTION ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION ......................................................................................................... 1 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING .............................................................................................. 1 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN ....................................................................... 25 1.5 CITY ACTIONS REQUESTED ........................................................................................... 25 2. ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST .......................................................................................... 27 2.1 BACKGROUND ................................................................................................................. 27 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED ............................................... 29 2.3 DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY) ................................. 29 2.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ............................................................... 30 3. ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS ............................................................................................. 39 3.1 AESTHETICS .................................................................................................................... 39 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES .............................................................. 63 3.3 AIR QUALITY ..................................................................................................................... 64 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES .............................................................................................. 71 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES ................................................................................................. 73 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS ..................................................................................................... 75 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS .................................................................................... 78 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS ..................................................................... 81 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY .............................................................................. 83 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING ............................................................................................. 88 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES .................................................................................................... 89 3.12 NOISE ............................................................................................................................... 89 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING ........................................................................................ 100 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES ......................................................................................................... 100 3.15 RECREATION .................................................................................................................. 101 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC ......................................................................................... 102 3.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS .............................................................................. 106 3.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE ................................................................ 107 4. REFERENCES .................................................................................................................... 109 5. LIST OF PREPARERS ........................................................................................................ 113 5.1 CITY OF ANAHEIM .......................................................................................................... 113 5.2 THE PLANNING CENTER|DC&E ................................................................................... 113 APPENDICES A. Event Management Plan B.1 Photometric Analysis B.2 Light Survey C. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis D. Noise Study E. Parking Study F. Water Quality Management Plan Table of Contents Page ii  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 List of Figures Figure Page Figure 1 Regional Location ............................................................................................................... 3 Figure 2 Local Vicinity ....................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3 Aerial Photograph ............................................................................................................... 7 Figure 4 Views of Existing Facilities .................................................................................................. 9 Figure 5 Views of Expansion Area .................................................................................................. 11 Figure 6 Campus Site Plan ............................................................................................................. 13 Figure 7 Campus Site Plan – Oblique View .................................................................................... 15 Figure 8 Site Plan, Aquatics Center ................................................................................................ 17 Figure 9 Landscape Plan, Keystone Street ..................................................................................... 19 Figure 10 Site Plan, Baseball Field ................................................................................................... 23 Figure 11 Views of Aquatics Complex .............................................................................................. 41 Figure 12 Views of Baseball Field ..................................................................................................... 43 Figure 13 Views of Baseball Field ..................................................................................................... 45 Figure 14 Light Pole Schematic ........................................................................................................ 47 Figure 15 Individual Fixture Assembly .............................................................................................. 49 Figure 16 Projected Light Levels ....................................................................................................... 55 Figure 17 Nighttime Simulated View 1 .............................................................................................. 57 Figure 18 Nighttime Simulated View 2 .............................................................................................. 59 Figure 19 Nighttime Simulated View 3 .............................................................................................. 61 Figure 20 Ambient Noise Measurement Locations ........................................................................... 93 Figure 21 Receiver Locations Used in Project Noise Analysis ......................................................... 95 List of Tables Table Page Table 1 Comparative Light Levels ................................................................................................. 52 Table 2 Ambient Light Measurements ........................................................................................... 53 Table 3 Maximum Daily Construction Regional Emissions ........................................................... 66 Table 4 Net Increase in Maximum Daily Regional Operational Emissions.................................... 67 Table 5 Localized Construction Emissions .................................................................................... 68 Table 6 Construction BMPs ........................................................................................................... 77 Table 7 Net Increase in Project-Related GHG Emissions .............................................................. 79 Table 8 BMPs Included in Project WQMP ..................................................................................... 84 Table 9 Ambient Noise Measurements, 24 Hours, August 2 – August 3, 2012 ............................ 90 Table 10 Noise Source Data Used in the Analysis .......................................................................... 91 Table 11 Predicted Aquatics Complex and Baseball Operations Noise Levels .............................. 91 Table 12 Typical Noise Levels at Construction Sites ....................................................................... 92 Table 13 Construction Equipment Ground Vibration Levels ........................................................... 97 Table 14 Construction-Related Vibration Annoyance ...................................................................... 98 Table 15 Parking Survey (August 2013) ........................................................................................ 105 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 1 1. Introduction The Servite High School Board of Directors is seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) by the City of Anaheim to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements, construct and operate a lighted aquatics center, reorient and light the existing baseball field and replace the existing lights on the football/soccer field with moderns. Servite is also requesting approval of a Variance for a reduced front yard setback along Keystone Street, less parking than required by Code, and maximum wall height, and a Tentative Parcel Map to consolidate the five residential parcels along Keystone Street into the main school campus property. 1.1 PROJECT LOCATION Servite High School is located at 1952 West La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim in Orange County. The City of Anaheim is in north-central Orange County. The western part of the City of Anaheim, in which the project site is located, is surrounded by the city of Fullerton to the north; the city of Buena Park to the west; and the cities of Cypress, Stanton, and Garden Grove to the south. Regional access to the project site is from Interstate 5 (I-5) via Brookhurst Street to the west or Euclid Street to the south; or from State Route 91 (SR-91) via the same two roadways (see Figures 1, Regional Location, and 2, Local Vicinity). The I-5/SR-91 interchange is about 1.9 miles west-northwest of the school. The site of the proposed aquatics center consists of four residences and one vacant lot along Keystone Street next to the west side of the campus. The baseball field is in the southwest corner of the campus, and the track and football/soccer field is in the southeast corner of the campus, as shown on Figure 3, Aerial Photograph. Vehicular access to the school for students and visitors, and pedestrian access, is from La Palma Avenue at the north end of the campus; and an entrance-only driveway from Wichita Street on the east side of the campus. Two staff-only parking lots are located on Keystone Street next to the west side of the campus. 1.2 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING 1.2.1 Existing Land Use Opened in 1958, Servite High School serves an enrollment of 950 boys in grades 9-12. Academic spaces are clustered in several buildings in the northwest part of the campus. The main campus parking lot is in the northeast part of the campus; the baseball field, and track and football/soccer field, are in the southwest and southeast corners of the campus, respectively. The existing swimming pool is in the center of the campus. Photographs and selected portions of the campus are shown on Figure 4, Views of Existing Facilities. The site of the proposed aquatics center currently contains four residences and one vacant lot along Keystone Street next to the west side of the campus (see Figure 5, Views of Expansion Area). 1.2.2 Surrounding Land Use Servite High School is surrounded to the west and south by single-family residential uses; to the east by Wichita Street and single-family residential uses; and by La Palma Avenue and single-family residential 1. Introduction Page 2  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 uses to the north. John Marshall Park and John Marshall Elementary School are opposite La Palma Avenue, and about 500 feet west, from the School. 1.3 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 1.3.1 Proposed Land Use The Servite High School Board of Directors is seeking the City of Anaheim’s approval of a CUP to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements (850 students previously approved; 950 students existing and proposed), construct and operate an aquatics center including lights for evening use, bleachers, and pool building with locker room, equipment rooms, storage, and concession stand, on the site of the existing residences; reorient the existing baseball field with home plate at the southwest corner; construct a new building along the southern property line housing a team room, storage, restrooms, and a concession stand; install metal bleachers with 460 seats capacity; erect a 30-foot fence along the right- and left-field edges of the baseball field to prevent balls from leaving the ball field; construct a 10-foot concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls along the southern and western property lines to help attenuate noise; relocate the music and weight buildings to the site of the existing swimming pool in the central part of the campus; erect field lighting for the baseball field; and replace field lighting for the track and football/soccer field; and permit demolition of four existing residences on the east side of Keystone Street. These features are shown on Figure 6, Campus Site Plan, and Figure 7, Campus Site Plan – Oblique View. Aquatics Center The proposed project includes a new aquatics center, which would include an Olympic-size pool (55 meters [60.1 yards] by 25 yards); bleachers for 450 spectators; and a pool building at the south end of the aquatics center with locker room, equipment rooms, storage, and concession stand (see Figure 8, Site Plan, Aquatics Center). Lighting for evening use of the pool would be installed on four 60-foot poles: two poles near the south end of the pool and two poles next to the north end of the pool. An eight-foot CMU wall would be built along the north boundary of the aquatics center site next to the adjoining residence. The aquatics complex involves an expansion of the campus where four single-family residences (934, 944, 950 and 954 North Keystone Street) and one vacant lot (940 North Keystone Street) are located. The four existing residences would be demolished. The properties have already been acquired by the school. Construction of the aquatics complex at this location would require a variance from the 25-foot structural setback requirement along Keystone Street per Zoning Code section 18.04.100. The proposed site plan provides a setback of 12 feet to the face of the aquatics center perimeter wall. To soften this edge, a landscape buffer is proposed to obscure views of the wall and bleachers. The proposed landscape plan is shown on Figure 9, Landscape Plan, Keystone Street. A Variance will also be required for the proposed eight-foot high CMU wall adjacent to a single family residence where Code permits a maximum height of six feet. Construction equipment and workers would access the site via W. La Palma Avenue and the campus driveway at the northwest corner of the campus. Use of this access road is intended to protect the adjacent neighborhood from the noise, dust and intrusion associated with construction traffic. The project includes the demolition of the existing swimming pool, the existing music room and weight room. Regional Location Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 1 0 Scale (Miles) 3 1. Introduction SITE La Habra Huntington Beach Westminster AnaheimCypress La Palma Buena Park Fullerton Garden Grove Stanton Brea Fountain Valley Santa Ana Seal Beach Villa Park Placentia Yorba Linda Orange Tustin 5 405 91 57 22 55 5 22 91 605 Los Alamitos405 1. Introduction Page 4  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 5 91 Local Vicinity Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 2 0 Scale (Feet) 2,000 1. Introduction W Lincoln Ave W Orangethorpe Ave W La Palma Ave N Brookhurst StN Euclid StW Catalup Ave Marshall Park Dad Miller Golf Course Anaheim Plaza Existing School Boundary Campus Expansion 1. Introduction Page 6  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Aerial Photograph Source: Google Earth Pro 2013 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 3 0 Scale (Feet) 350 Existing School Boundary 1. Introduction Campus Expansion W La Palma Ave W Catalpa Ave W Glenoaks Ave W Dogwood Ave N Onondaga AveN Chippewa AveN Wichita StN Keystone StN Fairview StN Fern St5 Residential Residential Residential Residential Marshall Park 1. Introduction Page 8  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. View of existing pool and lights. View of existing football field lights (east side of campus). View of existing left field fence and residences beyond. Views of Existing Facilities Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 4 1. Introduction 1. Introduction Page 10  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. View of 950 North Keystone. View of 940 North Keystone. View from campus looking south- east (existing residences are beyond trees). Views of Expansion Area Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 5 1. Introduction 1. Introduction Page 12  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Campus Site Plan 1. Introduction Source: IBI Group 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 6 0 Scale (Feet) 130W Catalpa AveN Whichita St W La Palma AveExisting Pool to be Demolished Existing Football/Soccer Field & Track Existing Student Lot A (258 Spaces) New Staff Lot D (10 Spaces) Reoriented Baseball Field New Aquatics Center N Keystone St Existing School Boundary Campus Expansion Light Poles Existing Staff Lot B (55 Spaces) New Staff Lot C (21 Spaces) 1. Introduction Page 14  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Campus Site Plan - Oblique View 1. Introduction Source: IBI Group Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 7 0 Scale (Feet) 100 EXISTING FIELD RE-ORIENTED BASEBALL FIELD RESIDE N TI A L NEW PARKI N G L O T NEW LIGHTS NEW LIGHTS DOGWO O D A V E K E Y S T O N E S T WEST C A T A L P A A V E WITCHITA STRESIDENTIAL 1. Introduction Page 16  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Site Plan, Aquatics Center Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 8 0 Scale (Feet) 25 1. Introduction N Keystone StAquatic Center Building Aquatic Center Pool Pool Size (55 m x 25 yd) Building Area :4,555 sf Type: 5B Lot C-21 Staff Parking (2 ADA) Ornamental Fence Gate Electrical Yard Existing School Boundary Campus Expansion Light PolesSource: IBI Group 2012 1. Introduction Page 18  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Landscape Plan, Keystone Street 1. Introduction Source: IBI Group 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 9 0 Scale (Feet) 50 Campus Expansion Existing School Boundary New Aquatics Center New Staff Lot C Residential Residential Residential 1. Introduction Page 20  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 1. Introduction Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 21 The existing power line that currently runs along the western edge of the campus would be placed underground and routed to the west around the new aquatics complex (the power line is visible in the photographs in Figure 5). Event Management Plan As presented in Appendix A, Servite High School has proposed an Event Management Plan to control its use and protect adjacent neighborhoods. The following is an excerpt from the Plan related to the Aquatics Center. The Aquatics Center serves students playing water polo, swimming, and physical education from 6:30 AM to 6:30 PM throughout the calendar year. Water polo games and swim meets are held after school and on some weekends during March – May and September – October. Use limitations are as follows: A. Pool use during the morning hours from 6:30 to 8:00 AM 1. Whistles may not be blown prior to 7:00 AM Noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels at the adjacent residential boundaries. 2. Lights shall not be turned on prior to 6:00 AM B. Pool use during the after-school hours from 3:00 to 6:30 PM 1. Whistles may not be blown after 7:00 PM Noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels at the adjacent residential boundaries. 2. Lights shall be turned off by 7:00 PM Baseball Field The existing baseball field would be reoriented with home plate at its southwest corner from its current orientation at the southeast corner. A new building would be built along the southern property line housing a team room, storage, restrooms, and a concession stand. Metal bleachers with 460 seats capacity would be installed behind home plate next to the south and west sides of the field (see Figure 10, Site Plan, Baseball Field). Field lighting would be installed on six poles ranging from 70 to 80 feet high: two poles along the south edge of the field, two poles along the west edge, and one pole each along the east and north edges. A 30-foot fence would be built along the right- and left-field edges of the baseball field to prevent balls from leaving the ball field, and 10-foot CMU walls would be built along the southern and western property lines to help attenuate noise. A Variance will be required for the proposed 10-foot high CMU wall and 30-foot high fencing adjacent to single family residences where Code permits a maximum height of six feet. Event Management Plan Lighting the baseball field would allow the field to be used in evening hours. The proposed Event Management Plan for the baseball field is shown below. The Baseball Field serves students playing baseball, football practice, and general physical education from 6:00 AM to 7:00 PM June through January. The field hours increase to 9:00 PM during the February through April game season. (Note: These are the same field operating times in use at Servite for several years). Use limitations are as follows: A. Field use during the morning hours from 6:00 to 8:00 AM 1. Introduction Page 22  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 1. Whistles, microphones, and/or PA systems may not be used before 6:30 AM Noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels at the adjacent residential boundaries. 2. Lights shall not be turned on prior to 6:00 AM B. Field use during the after-school hours during game season from 3:00 to 9:00 PM 1. Whistles, microphones, and/or PA systems may not be used after 9:00 PM Noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels at the adjacent residential boundaries. 2. Lights shall be turned off by 9:30 PM Track and Football/Soccer Field The existing lights at the football/soccer field would be removed and new field lighting would be installed. The existing lights are on low poles and placing modern lights at 70- to 80-foot heights, with glare shields would reduce spillover lighting and glare at nearby residences. The lighting levels across the field would be improved and more consistent across the field, while reducing off-site impacts. The school does not plan to change any activities or events held at the campus as a result of modernizing lights. For example, Servite High School’s varsity football games would continue to be held at Cerritos College. Event Management Plan Management of the football/soccer field would not change as a result of the project. However, for information purposes, the use limitations in place are highlighted below. Courage Field serves students playing soccer, football, track, and lacrosse from 6:00 AM to 9:00 PM (Note these are the same field operating times in use at Servite for several years). Use limitations are as follows: A. Field use during the morning hours from 6:00 to 8:00 AM 1. Whistles, microphones, and/or PA systems may not be used before 6:30 AM Noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels at the adjacent residential boundaries. 2. Lights shall not be turned on prior to 6:00 AM B. Field use during the after-school hours from 3:00 PM to 9:00 PM 1. Whistles, microphones, and/or PA systems after 9:00 PM Noise levels shall not exceed 60 decibels at the adjacent residential boundaries. 2. Lights shall be turned off by 9:30 PM Music Room and Weight Room The music room and weight room would be rebuilt on the site of the existing swimming pool in the central part of the campus. Site Plan, Baseball Field 1. Introduction Source: IBI Group 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 10 0 Scale (Feet) 40ResidentialResidentialDugout Circulation Storage ToiletToiletTeam RoomDugoutCirculation ConcessionPr e s s B o x Existing School Boundary 80-ft Light Pole 1. Introduction Page 24  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 1. Introduction Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 25 Parking The project involves construction of a 25-space staff-only parking lot next to the south end of the aquatics center (see Lot C in Figure 6). All visitor and athlete parking for the aquatics center would continue to be limited to the existing student and visitor lot in the northeast part of the campus (see Lot A in Figure 6), as stipulated in the project Events Management Plan included as Appendix A to this Initial Study. The parking lots on the west side of campus would be controlled by locked gates to ensure that the adjacent neighborhood is not impacted by visitors accessing the aquatics center from this direction. 1.3.2 Project Phasing Upon approval of the CUP by the City of Anaheim, demolition of the four residences, the existing swimming pool, the existing baseball field, and removal of the existing field lights at the track and football/soccer field would be completed in one phase. Construction of all proposed improvements except for the planned staff parking lot at the south end of the aquatics center would then be completed in one phase; the site of the proposed staff parking lot would be used for construction staging for the aquatics center. The staff parking lot would be the last phase to be constructed. 1.4 EXISTING ZONING AND GENERAL PLAN The existing zoning on the Servite High School campus is Transition (T), which includes land in agricultural use; land in transitory or interim uses; land restricted to limited uses because of special conditions; and land not designated in another zoning district. The existing zoning on the five residential parcels in the site of the aquatics center is RS-2, single-family residential with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet (Anaheim 2012). The General Plan designation for Servite High School is Schools; the designation for the residential parcels in the site of the aquatics center is Low-Density Residential, permitting single-family residential uses on lot sizes of approximately 5,000 to 10,000 square feet (Anaheim 2013). 1.5 CITY ACTIONS REQUESTED Project approval would require three discretionary approvals by the City of Anaheim: a Conditional Use Permit (CUP); a variance to the required front yard setback, reduced parking, and fence height permitted in the RS-2 Zone as set forth in City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.04.100, for the proposed aquatics center; and a tentative parcel map to incorporate the five residential parcels into the project site. Conditional Use Permit Educational institutions are permitted in the Transitional and RS-2 Zones with a CUP (City of Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.14.030 and 18.04.030). A CUP is needed to permit development of the aquatics center on land zoned RS-2, retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements, and to permit development of the proposed improvements within the existing campus. Setback and Fence Height Variance The required structural setback from the street in the RS-2 Zone is 25 feet (City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.04.100). The front wall of the proposed aquatics center would be 12 feet from Keystone Street. The maximum permitted fence height in the RS-2 Zone is 6 feet and 8 to 30-foot high fencing is proposed adjacent to single family residential properties. A variance from the required setback and 1. Introduction Page 26  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 permitted fence height would be needed to permit development of the aquatics center and baseball field improvements as planned. Tentative Parcel Map A tentative parcel map would be required to consolidate the five residential parcels on the aquatics center site into the project site. Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 27 2. Environmental Checklist 2.1 BACKGROUND 1. Project Title: Servite High School Improvement Project 2. Lead Agency Name and Address: City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 3. Contact Person and Phone Number: David See, Senior Planner 714 765 4948 4. Project Location: The project site is on the central and southern parts of the Servite High School campus at 1952 West La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim; and includes five developed residential parcels: 954, 950, 944, 940, and 934 North Keystone Street. 5. Project Sponsor’s Name and Address: Servite High School 1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 6. General Plan Designation: Servite High School campus: Schools. Five residential properties, Aquatics Center Site: Low-Density Residential. 7. Zoning: Servite High School campus: Transition (T). Five residential properties, Aquatics Center Site: RS-2, single-family residential with a minimum lot size of 7,200 square feet. 8. Description of Project The Servite High School Board of Directors is seeking approval of a Conditional Use Permit by the City of Anaheim to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements, construct and operate an aquatics center including lights for evening use, bleachers, and pool building with locker room, equipment rooms, storage, and concession stand, on the site of the existing residences; reorient the existing baseball field with home plate at the southwest corner; construct a new building along the southern property line housing a team room, storage, restrooms, and a concession stand; erect a 30-foot fence along the right-field edge of the baseball field to prevent balls from leaving the ball field; construct a 10-foot concrete masonry unit (CMU) walls along the southern and western property lines to help attenuate noise; relocate the music and weight buildings to the site of the existing swimming pool in the central part of the campus; erect field lighting for the baseball field; and replace field lighting for the track and football/soccer field; and 2. Environmental Checklist Page 28  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 permit demolition of five existing residences on the east side of Keystone Street. A variance from the required setback, reduced parking, and permitted fence height would be needed to permit development of the aquatics center and baseball field improvements as planned. A tentative parcel map would also be required to consolidate the five residential parcels on the aquatics center site into the project site. 9. Surrounding Land Uses and Setting Servite High School is a private Catholic boys’ high school with 950 students that has operated since 1958. The school is surrounded to the west and south by single-family residential uses; to the east by Wichita Street and single-family residential uses; and by La Palma Avenue and single-family residential uses to the north. 10. Other Public Agencies Whose Approval Is Required: South Coast Air Quality Management District: Permit to Construct State Water Resources Control Board: Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan approval Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board: Water Quality Management Plan approval. Anaheim Fire Department: Site Plan approval for emergency access and emergency evacuation routes. 2. Environmental Checklist Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 29 2.2 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agricultural and Forest Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology / Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards & Hazardous Materials Hydrology / Water Quality Land Use / Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population / Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation / Traffic Utilities / Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance 2.3 DETERMINATION (TO BE COMPLETED BY THE LEAD AGENCY) On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect 1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and 2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier EIR or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Printed Name For 2. Environmental Checklist Page 30  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 2.4 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS 1) A brief explanation is required for all answers except “No Impact” answers that are adequately supported by the information sources a lead agency cites in the parentheses following each question. A “No Impact” answer is adequately supported if the referenced information sources show that the impact simply does not apply to projects like the one involved (e.g., the project falls outside a fault rupture zone). A “No Impact” answer should be explained where it is based on project-specific factors, as well as general standards (e.g., the project would not expose sensitive receptors to pollutants, based on a project-specific screening analysis). 2) All answers must take account of the whole action involved, including off-site as well as on-site, cumulative as well as project-level, indirect as well as direct, and construction as well as operational impacts. 3) Once the lead agency has determined that a particular physical impact may occur, then the checklist answers must indicate whether the impact is potentially significant, less than significant with mitigation, or less than significant. “Potentially Significant Impact” is appropriate if there is substantial evidence that an effect may be significant. If there are one or more “Potentially Significant Impact” entries when the determination is made, an EIR is required. 4) “Negative Declaration: Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated” applies where the incorporation of mitigation measures has reduced an effect from “Potentially Significant Impact” to a “Less Than Significant Impact.” The lead agency must describe the mitigation measures, and briefly explain how they reduce the effect to a less than significant level. 5) Earlier analyses may be used where, pursuant to the tiering, program EIR, or other CEQA process, an effect has been adequately analyzed in an earlier EIR or negative declaration. Section 15063(c)(3)(D). In this case, a brief discussion should identify the following: a) Earlier Analyses Used. Identify and state where they are available for review. b) Impacts Adequately Addressed. Identify which effects from the above checklist were within the scope of and adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and state whether such effects were addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis. c) Mitigation Measures. For effects that are “Less than Significant with Mitigation Measures Incorporated,” describe the mitigation measures which were incorporated or refined from the earlier document and the extent to which they address site-specific conditions for the project. 6) Lead agencies are encouraged to incorporate into the checklist references to information sources for potential impacts (e.g., general plans, zoning ordinances). Reference to a previously prepared or outside document should, where appropriate, include a reference to the page or pages where the statement is substantiated. A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 7) Supporting Information Sources: A source list should be attached, and other sources used or individuals contacted should be cited in the discussion. 2. Environmental Checklist Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 31 8) This is only a suggested form, and lead agencies are free to use different formats; however, lead agencies should normally address the questions from this checklist that are relevant to a project’s environmental effects in whatever format is selected. 9) The explanation of each issue should identify: a) the significance criteria or threshold, if any, used to evaluate each question; and b) the mitigation measure identified, if any, to reduce the impact to less than significant. Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact I. AESTHETICS. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? X b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? X c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? X d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? X II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES. In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? X b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? X c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? X d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? X e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? 2. Environmental Checklist Page 32  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact III. AIR QUALITY. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? X b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? X c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non- attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? X d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? X e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? X IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? X c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? X d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? X e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? X f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? X V. CULTURAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? X b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? X 2. Environmental Checklist Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 33 Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? X d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? X VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS. Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. X ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? X iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? X iv) Landslides? X b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? X c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? X d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? X e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? X VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS. Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? X b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? X VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS. Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? X b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? X c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one- quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? X 2. Environmental Checklist Page 34  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? X g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? X h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? X IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY. Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? X b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? X c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site X d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? X e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? X f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? X g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? X h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? X 2. Environmental Checklist Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 35 Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? X j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X X. LAND USE AND PLANNING. Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? X b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? X c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? X XI. MINERAL RESOURCES. Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? X b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? X XII. NOISE. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? X b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? X c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? X e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? X XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING. Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? X 2. Environmental Checklist Page 36  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? X XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES. Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? X b) Police protection? X c) Schools? X d) Parks? X e) Other public facilities? X XV. RECREATION. a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? X b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? X XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? X b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? X c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? X d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? X e) Result in inadequate emergency access? X f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? X 2. Environmental Checklist Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 37 Issues Potentially Significant Impact Less Than Significant With Mitigation Incorporated Less Than Significant Impact No Impact g) Result in inadequate parking capacity?) X XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS. Would the project: a) Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? X b) Require or result in the construction of new water or waste water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? X d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources or are new or expanded entitlements needed? X e) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? X f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? X g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? X XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE. a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? X b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) X c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? X 2. Environmental Checklist Page 38  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 39 3. Environmental Analysis Section 2.3 provided a checklist of environmental impacts. This section provides an evaluation of the impact categories and questions contained in the checklist and identifies mitigation measures, if applicable. 3.1 AESTHETICS a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Less Than Significant Impact. Scenic vistas are panoramic views of natural or man-made features – such as mountains, oceans or lakes, forests, or urban skylines – not available from most places. The San Gabriel Mountains to the north, and Santa Ana Mountains to the east, are visible from the baseball field and track and football/soccer field on the campus. No scenic vistas are visible from the five residences on the aquatics center site (the San Gabriel Mountains are visible from Keystone Street in front of the residences). The proposed building next to the baseball field housing a team room, storage, restrooms, and concession stand would be along the southern property line near the left-field line. The building would be one story high and would not block existing views of the Santa Ana Mountains to the east. Proposed field light poles – 60 feet high over the aquatics center, and 70 to 80 feet high over the baseball field and track and football/soccer field – would not substantially block scenic vistas from surrounding land uses. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? No Impact. The project would remove trees within the five affected parcels. The Italian Cypress trees that run along the eastern edge of these parcels (visible in 3rd photo, Figure 5) are typical ornamental landscape trees and are not significant scenic resources. Street trees on Keystone Street and Dogwood Street next to the five residential parcels would remain, and the project includes installation of an enhanced landscape area along the aquatics complex intended to buffer the views of aquatics center (see Figure 9, Landscape Plan, Keystone Street). There are no rock outcroppings within the project site. Neither Servite High School nor any of the five affected parcels are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or as a California Historical Landmark or California Point of Historical Interest (NPS 2013; OHP 2013). Project development would not damage significant scenic resources such as trees, rock outcroppings, or historic buildings. The nearest state scenic highway to the project site is SR-91 about seven miles east of the site (Caltrans 2011). No impacts would occur. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Less Than Significant Impact. Development of the aquatics center would change the visual character of the five parcels along Keystone Street. These one-story, single-family residences and one vacant lot would be replaced with the aquatics center as described in Section 1. The aquatics center building and perimeter wall would be visible from Keystone Street as shown on Figure 11, Views of Aquatics Center. The aquatics buildings and the wall would be constructed of concrete masonry block. The aquatics building would have a sloped roof, running from 10 feet tall to its highest reaching 14 ft, 3 inches tall. As shown in Figure 11, a canopy covers the bleachers and a green screen is used at intervals along the wall 3. Environmental Analysis Page 40  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 to soften the view of masonry block wall as viewed from Keystone Street. The top of the canopy is 12 feet high. The project also includes a proposal to add enhanced landscaping along Keystone Street. As shown in Figures 8 and 9, the existing 8-foot parkway with grass and street trees and 4-foot sidewalk within the public right-of-way would remain. The 12-foot setback between the sidewalk and the aquatics complex would be landscaped as shown in Figure 9, Landscape Plan, Keystone Street. The Crape Myrtle trees and other plant materials are intended to soften the visual edge of the building and wall. Given the limited heights of the building and wall and the enhanced landscaping, the visual change is not considered a significant impact. The project would not change the location of the baseball field, but the field would be re-oriented by shifting home plate from the southeast corner to the southwest corner and centerfield would move from the northwest corner to the northeast corner (see Figure 12, Views of the Baseball Field). The existing backstop and netting, dugouts and related buildings and storage areas would be demolished. The infield would be developed at the new location and new dugouts, raised press box, grand stands, team room, storage, concession stand and restrooms would be constructed. A new backstop would be erected and a 30-foot fence (poles with netting) would be built to prevent balls from leaving the ball field. A 10-foot masonry block wall would be built along the southern and western property lines to help attenuate noise. Because of the limited length of the right field fence, a 30-foot fence would be erected to prevent balls from reaching the football/soccer field. Figure 13 provides two interior views of the baseball field. The visual elements of the re-oriented ball field would not differ significantly from the existing field, although the elements the rise above the property fences would become visible to a different set of residences. The roofs of the bleacher structures begin at the top of the 10-foot concrete block wall and extend up and away from the property line only a few additional feet. The backstop and foul ball fences extend up 30 feet, but the thin netting is see-through and not visually intrusive. The locations of the existing swimming pool, portable buildings to be demolished, and proposed weight and music rooms are all internal to the campus would not impact any views from outlying areas. The light poles and luminaire assemblies erected at the new aquatics complex, baseball field and football/soccer field would be visible from adjoining neighborhood (see Figure 14, Light Pole Schematic, and Figure 15, Individual Fixture Assembly). Lighting for evening use of the pool would be installed on four 60‐foot poles: two poles near the south end of the pool and two poles next to the north end of the pool. Lighting at the baseball field would be installed on six poles ranging from 70 to 80 feet high: two poles along the south edge of the field, two poles along the west edge, and one pole each along the east and north edges. The existing lights at the football/soccer field would be removed and new field lighting would be installed on 70‐ and 80‐foot poles. Two of the poles would be shared with the baseball field. The views of the aquatics center and baseball field provided in Figures 11, 12 and 13 provide a perspective of how visible these poles are relative to the school facilities. While the proposed lights are substantially taller than the existing lights at the football/soccer field and existing pool, there is a tradeoff with the control of spillover light and glare. By installing taller lights, the luminaires may be directed at a more acute angle, which will direct more light on the field and in combination with glare shields will minimize spillover onto other properties (see (d) below). However, the additional height makes the light poles and luminaires more visible during the day. Views of the Aquatic Center 3. Environmental Analysis Source: IBI Group 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 11 Perspective View from Keystone Street - Location “A” Western Elevation Interior Perspective - Location “B” Locations of Views Keystone Street POOL SETBACK AND ENHANCED LANDSCAPE ZONE EXISTING STREET TREES CRAPE MYRTLE A B A View Locations 3. Environmental Analysis Page 42  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. BASEBALL F.F 0' - 0" T.O. BLEACHER7' - 0" BASEBALLBLEACHERS ROOF 11' - 0"9' - 0"5' - 0"4' - 0"2' - 0"COOL ROOF CMU WALL BASEBALL F.F0' - 0" T.O. BLEACHER7' - 0" BASEBALL ROOF 10' - 0"7' - 0"30' - 0"COOL ROOF CMU WALL BASEBALL F.F 0' - 0" T.O. BLEACHER7' - 0" BASEBALL ROOF 10' - 0" 1 A301 AABBCCDDII 5' - 9 3/4"6' - 11 1/2"CMU WALLS ISSUE DATE: IBI Landscape:name:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners address: 31742 Coast Highway Laguna Beach, CA 92651Phone: 949-645-9444Fax:fax 949-715-7286 GROUP ARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612 Phone 949-833-5588 Fax 949-833-5511 CLIENT PRIME CONSULTANT SEAL CONSULTANTS PROJECT TITLE SHEET TITLE SHEET NUMBER COPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUP COPYRIGHT: Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other than authorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication. SCALE: CHK'D BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: consultant seal architect's seal 1/8" = 1'-0"12/3/2012 2:45:45 PM1952 West La Palma Ave. Anaheim, California 92801 A301 BASEBALL COMPLEX-SECTIONS Checker Author 03/19/2012 29957 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL 1952 West La Palma Avenue SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Anaheim, California 92801 1/8" = 1'-0"1 Section 7 1/8" = 1'-0"4 Section 3 2 SECTION 3D 1/8" = 1'-0"3 Section 4 REVISIONS NO. DATE APPRD.DESCRIPTION Views of the Baseball Field 3. Environmental Analysis Source: IBI Group 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 12 0 Scale (Feet) 30 3. Environmental Analysis Page 44  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Views of Baseball Field Source: IBI Group 2012 The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 13 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study 3. Environmental Analysis Page 46  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Light Pole Schematic Source: Musco Green Generation Lighting The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 14 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study Number of Luminaires vary 3. Environmental Analysis Page 48  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Individual Fixture Assembly Source: Musco Green Generation Lighting The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 15 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study 3. Environmental Analysis Page 50  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 51 While the visual character would change as a result of the project, and the evaluation of such changes is subjective in nature, the impact is not considered significant. The most intrusive element into the neighborhood is the proposed aquatics center, but the enhanced landscaping proposed along the Keystone Street would soften this edge. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare, which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The proposed project includes the installation of lights for evening events and practices at the new aquatics center and reoriented baseball field and replacement of the existing lights at the football/soccer field. The locations and heights of all new light poles and number of luminaires on each pole are shown on Figure 14, Projected Light Levels. The eight existing light poles at the football/soccer field and existing pool to the removed are also shown on Figure 14. The heights of the poles at pool would be 60 feet and three lights at the baseball field would be 70 feet in height and three would be 80 feet in height. The proposed heights of two northern and two southern light poles at the football field are 70 feet and 80 feet, respectively. They would replace eight existing light poles that are 30 feet in height. The lights to be replaced are older technologies that do not provide adequate and consistent lighting levels across the field and because of the low heights, the near right angle of light projection and lack of shields, the residences along the east side of Wichita Street currently experience significant glare from the east facing lights from the opposite side of the field. The front face of these residences are clearly lit by the direct line-of sight-from the football field luminaires and residents have drawn their blinds on the front windows to block the light. When viewed directly from the front of one of these Wichita Street residences, the direct glare from the east-facing lights is significant and uncomfortable. This occurs because the lights are located on 30-foot poles and the resulting right angle of the luminaires makes the lamps directly visible from this location. While the front face of the residences are lit by the football field lights, the front yards are not because of the 8-foot fence with heavy mesh that is located along the football field blocks this direct light. Nighttime illumination and glare analysis addresses the effects of a project’s exterior lighting upon adjoining uses and areas. Light and glare impacts are determined through a comparison of the existing light sources with the anticipated lighting conditions upon project implementation. The following definitions include terms that are relevant to light analysis. A foot-candle (fc) is a unit of measure of the intensity of light falling on a surface equal to one lumen per square foot. The foot-candle is a unit based on English measurements. Although foot-candles are considered obsolete in some scientific circles, they are nevertheless used because many existing light meters are calibrated in foot-candles. Moonlight produces approximately 0.01 fc, while sunlight can produce up to 10,000 fc. The general benchmarks for light levels are shown in Table 1. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 52  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Table 1 Comparative Light Levels Outdoor Light Foot-candle Direct Sunlight 10,000 Full Daylight 1,000 Overcast Day 100 Dusk 10 Twilight 1 Deep Twilight 0.1 Full Moon 0.01 Quarter Moon 0.001 Moonless Night 0.0001 Overcast Night 0.00001 Gas station canopies 25–30 Typical neighborhood streetlight 1.0–5.0 Source: Musco Lighting 2012; The Engineering ToolBox 2013. A lumen is a measurement of light energy or of light emitted from a light source. Illuminance is the amount of light present on a surface or plane, typically expressed in a horizontal plane (i.e. on the ground) or in a vertical plane (i.e. on the side of a building). Luminaire (light fixture) a complete lighting unit consisting of a lamp or lamps and ballast(s) (when applicable) together with the parts designed to distribute the light, to position and protect the lamps, and to connect the lamps to the power supply. Spill Light is light falling where it is not wanted or needed (also known as light trespass, stray light, obtrusive light). Stadium spill light is light that trespasses beyond the intended area and illuminates adjacent properties. Sky Glow is the amount of light reflecting into the night sky that reduces visibility of the sky and stars. It is a concern in many jurisdictions, especially those with observatories. The City of Irvine does not have lighting regulations for stadium lighting. Glare is an intense and blinding light that reduces visibility; a light within the field of vision that is brighter than the brightness to which the eyes are adapted. Direct glare is caused by looking at an unshielded lamp or a light at maximum candlepower. Direct glare is dependent on the light source’s brightness, the contrast between the light source and brightness of the surrounding environment, the size of the light source, and its position. Discomfort glare is glare that produces discomfort, but does not necessarily diminish visual performance. Disability glare is glare resulting in reduced visual performance and visibility, and is often accompanied by discomfort. Glare can be uncomfortable and/or disabling, and for all receptors glare is unacceptable. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 53 Light and Glare Thresholds Light and glare would have a significant impact if the project would create substantial glare or if project lighting would substantially exceed industry lighting standards. There are no existing limits for light and glare adopted by the City of Anaheim. For this reason, other agency standards were reviewed and the standards developed by the Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) have often been applied by other jurisdictions. LAUSD defines a threshold of “no more than two foot-candles, measured at the residential property line” for stadium lighting (Program EIR for the New School Construction Program, 2004). This threshold is consistent with Chapter 9, Article 3, Section 93.0117 of the City of Los Angeles zoning code, which states, “No exterior light source may cause more than two foot-candles of lighting intensity or generate direct glare onto exterior glazed windows or glass doors; elevated habitable porch, deck, or balcony; or any ground surface intended for uses such as recreation, barbecue or lawn areas or any other property containing a residential unit or units.” In the absence of established light and glare threshold, the City of Anaheim is applying the standard that light trespass is considered significant if the new lights result in a 2.0 fc increase in light at the property line of a sensitive receptor, such as a residence. Existing Lighting Ambient lighting was surveyed on Thursday, August 1, 2013 between 8:30 and 8:55 PM by The Planning Center | DC&E using a Sper Scientific 850008 light meter. Measurement locations are shown in Appendix B, Light Measurements. Ambient light measurements are shown below in Table 2. Street lights were the only visible ambient light sources at each of the measurement locations. Table 2 Ambient Light Measurements Location Measurement, foot-candles Meter aimed at sites of pole-mounted field lights Meter aimed straight up Football/Soccer Field: Residential property lines opposite Wichita Street from football/soccer field in southeast part of campus1. Field lights On. 1 918 N Wichita Street 0.77 0.05 2 922 N Wichita Street 1.16 0.29 3 928 N Wichita Street 1.56 0.19 4 936 N Wichita Street 1.07 0.18 Proposed Aquatics Center: Residential property lines along Keystone Street and Dogwood Avenue2 A Parking lot, north side of Dogwood Avenue 2.02 --- B 1960 W Dogwood Avenue: north side of Dogwood 1.87 --- C 1960 W Dogwood, east side/Keystone 2.02 --- D 1972 W Dogwood 0.27 0.13 E 955 N Keystone 0.35 0.18 F 951 N Keystone 0.42 0.24 G 945 N Keystone 0.33 0.15 H 941 N Keystone 0.29 0.08 1 Measurements at front yard fences at 5 feet height. Locations 1 and 2 were moved 5 feet and 10 feet north of center of lots, respectively, to move from tree blocking direct light. An eight-foot fence with netting along east side of football field blocks direct light from between the fence and the base of the residences. Thus, the front yards were dark but the faces of the homes were clearly lit. Some residents had blinds drawn to block light. 2 Measurements at 5 feet height at middle of lot. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 54  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Spill Light Impacts A lighting study of the proposed lights was prepared by Musco Sports Lighting and is included as Appendix B of this Initial Study. Figure 16, Projected Light Levels, shows the location of poles, mounting heights and other information for the aquatics complex, baseball field and football/soccer field. Based on the Musco Lighting analysis, spillover lighting would be above the 2.0 fc threshold along six residences along the baseball field. Figures 17 and 18, Nighttime Simulated Views 1 and 2, show simulated nighttime views looking southeast (View 1) and southwest (View 2). These figures exaggerate the lighting spill overs somewhat because they do not include the fences and trees located along the school perimeter. The light/glare impact at the Wichita Street residences is not significant. These residences should experience a reduction in the glare they now experience from the portable lights used for evening football practice. This would occur because the increased mounting heights of the proposed lights allow the lamps to be directed down to the playing surface and not at a right angle across the field. The new lights would substantially reduce the direct view and glare of the existing lights. Figure 19, Nighttime Simulated View 3, provides a view of the new football lights looking from Wichita Street. This demonstrates that a high level of lighting is achieved on the field, while direct glare from the lamps is minimized. (Note that the 8-foot fence and netting have been omitted from the view). Mitigation Measures 1. Prior to building permit approval, Servite High School shall submit detailed lighting plans to the City of Anaheim demonstrating light levels (horizontal and vertical) along adjacent residential property lines. Light levels that exceed 2.0 fc at any portion of a residential property line shall trigger the following offer:  Servite High School shall provide an offer to fund blinds, shutters or other means acceptable to the homeowners to block spillover light from entering ballfield-facing windows. This offer shall be made to the homeowners 60 days prior to and payment made at least 30 days prior to the first lighting of the field. A homeowner’s refusal to accept payment shall not be considered Servite’s failure to accomplish this mitigation requirement.  The mitigation payment shall not exceed $2,000 per impacted residences.  This mitigation applies to the following addresses, or as revised pursuant to the final lighting plans: 930, 924, 920, 914 and 910 N. Keystone and 1939 W. Catalpa Avenue. 2. After initial completion, each luminaire and shields affixed on the pole shall be situated and adjusted so that no lighting levels on residential property lines are minimized and are compliance with the final detailed lighting plans submitted to the City. After the appropriate burn-in time for the lights, Servite High School shall take measurements to confirm these levels have been achieved and submit same to the City of Anaheim Planning Department. 3. Servite High School shall program evening use of the pool so that the aquatic center and baseball field lights are off by 7:00 PM and 9:30 PM, respectively, consistent with the Event Management Plan. Projected Light Levels 3. Environmental Analysis Source: Musco Lighting 2012, 2013 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 16 0 Scale (Feet) 100 Football/ Soccer/Track Existing School Boundary Campus Expansion Proposed Light Locations Existing Lights to be Removed Baseball Field Residential Residential Residential Existing Pool West La Palma Ave ResidentialWichita StKeystone StResidentialPole Luminaires Location Pole Heights and Number of Lamps 2 2 1 1 3 4 QTY Size Mounting Height Qty/PoleLamp Type A1-A2 B1-B2 C1 C2 F1-F3 P1-P4 70’ 80’ 70’ 80’ 70’ 60’ 70’ 80’ 70’ 80’ 70’ 60’ 1,500W MZ 1,500W MZ 1,500W MZ 1,500W MZ 1,500W MZ 1,500W MZ 5 10 7 7/12* 10 2 94 *This structure utilizes a back-to-back mounting configuration. TOTALS13 Maximum Vertical Light Levels Above 2.0 fc at Residential Property Line B1 A1 3. Environmental Analysis Page 56  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Nighttime Simulated View 1 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 17 Note: Fences, trees, and shrubs are not shown - all lights are on. View looking southwest.Wichita StResidential Residential Residential 3. Environmental Analysis Page 58  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Nighttime Simulated View 2 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 18 Note: Fences, trees, and shrubs are not shown - all lights are on. The aquatics center structure is not shown in this view simulation. As the aquatics center lights would be aimed into the interior of the building, spill light from the aquatics center lights shown here is a worst-case scenario. View looking southeast. Residential Keystone St Residential Wichita St Residential Residential 3. Environmental Analysis Page 60  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Nighttime Simulated View 3 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 19 Note: Fences, trees, and shrubs are not shown - all lights are on. View of new football field lights, looking west. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 62  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 63 3.2 AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Dept. of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the state’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? No Impact. The project site and surrounding land are mapped as Urban and Built-Up Land on the California Important Farmland Finder, and there is no important farmland on or near the project site (DLRP 2013). The site is developed with school and residential uses; project development would not convert mapped farmland to nonagricultural uses, and no impact would occur. b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? No Impact. The Transition (T) zoning on the Servite campus allows agricultural uses; however, Servite High School has operated since 1958. Crop agriculture is prohibited in the RS-2 zone on the aquatics center site. Thus, the project would not conflict with long-standing school uses or with zoning on the aquatics center site. Williamson Act contracts restrict the use of privately-owned land to agriculture and compatible open-space uses under contract with local governments; in exchange, the land is taxed based on actual use rather than potential market value. Williamson Act contracts are only available in agricultural preserves, and there are no Williamson Act contracts in effect onsite. No impact would occur. c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? No Impact. Forest land is defined as “land that can support 10-percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits” (California Public Resources Code Section 12220[g]). Timberland is defined as “land…which is available for, and capable of, growing a crop of trees of any commercial species used to produce lumber and other forest products, including Christmas trees” (California Public Resources Code Section 4526). The project site is zoned Transitional (T) and single-family residential (RS-2), and is not zoned as forest land, timberland, or timberland production. No impact would occur. d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? No Impact. The project site is developed as a high school and single-family residences. There is no forest land onsite, and no impact would occur. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 64  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non- forest use? No Impact. There is no mapped farmland on or near the site, and no impact would occur. 3.3 AIR QUALITY The Air Quality section addresses the impacts of the proposed project on ambient air quality and the exposure of people, especially sensitive individuals, to unhealthful pollutant concentrations. The primary air pollutants of concern for which ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been established are ozone (O3), carbon monoxide (CO), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxides (NO2), and lead (Pb). Areas are classified under the federal and California Clean Air Act as in either attainment or nonattainment for each criteria pollutant based on whether the AAQS have been achieved. The South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), which is managed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD), is designated as nonattainment for O3, PM2.5, PM101, and lead (Los Angeles County only) under the California and National AAQS and nonattainment for NO2 under the California AAQS. This section analyzes the types and quantities of air pollutant emissions that would be generated by the construction and operation of the proposed project. A background discussion on the air quality regulatory setting, meteorological conditions, existing ambient air quality in the vicinity of the project site, and air quality modeling can be found in Appendix C to this Initial Study. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Less Than Significant Impact. A consistency determination plays an important role in local agency project review by linking local planning and individual projects to the air quality management plan (AQMP). It fulfills the CEQA goal in informing decision makers of the environmental efforts of the project under consideration at an early enough stage to ensure that air quality concerns are fully addressed. It also provides the local agency with ongoing information as to whether they are contributing to clean air goals contained in the AQMP. The most recent adopted comprehensive plan is the 2012 AQMP, which was adopted December 7, 2012 (see Appendix A to this Initial Study for a description of the 2012 AQMP). Regional growth projections are used by SCAQMD to forecast future emission levels in the SoCAB. For southern California, these regional growth projections are provided by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) and are partially based on land use designations included in city/county general plans. Typically, only large, regionally significant projects have the potential to affect the regional growth projections. The proposed project is not a regionally significant project that would warrant Intergovernmental Review by SCAG. Implementation of the project would consist of removal of and replacement of the existing the existing swimming pool, music room, and weight room; adding 450 1 CARB approved the SCAQMD’s request to redesignate the SoCAB from serious nonattainment for PM10 to attainment for PM10 under the national AAQS on March 25, 2010 because the SoCAB has not violated federal 24- hour PM10 standards during the period from 2004 to 2007. However, the USEPA has not yet approved this request. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 65 bleacher seats at the aquatic center; removal of the existing residences; and construction of a new baseball building. The regional emissions generated by operation of the proposed project would be less than the SCAQMD emissions thresholds and the regional emissions generated by operation of the proposed project would be less than the SCAQMD emissions thresholds. Therefore, the project would not be considered by SCAQMD to be a substantial source of air pollutant emissions. The project would not conflict or obstruct implementation of the AQMP. Impacts are less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Less Than Significant Impact. The following describes project-related impacts from short-term construction activities and long-term operation of the proposed project. Short-Term Air Quality Impacts Construction activities would result in the generation of air pollutants. These emissions would primarily be 1) exhaust emissions from off-road diesel-powered construction equipment; 2) dust generated by demolition (existing facilities and residences on-site), grading, earthmoving, and other construction activities; 3) exhaust emissions from on-road vehicles and 4) off-gas emissions of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from application of asphalt. Construction activities would be carried out in two phases and would take approximately 22 months in total. Demolition activities would require export of 6,311 tons of demolition debris. Phase 1 rough grading would involve 3,450 cubic yards of soil export, whereas fine grading would involve soil import of 1,010 cubic yards and 2,440 cubic yards of soil export. Phase 2 grading would involve a soil export of 28 cubic yards. The construction emissions shown in Table 3 were estimated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2013.2, based on the construction information and the project’s construction schedule provided by the District. Where specific information regarding project-related construction activities was not available, construction assumptions were based on CalEEMod defaults. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 66  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Table 3 Maximum Daily Construction Regional Emissions Construction Phase Criteria Air Pollutants1,2 (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Phase 1 Demolition 4 23 17 <1 12 3 Site Preparation 2 15 8 <1 1 1 Rough Grading 3 20 15 <1 7 3 Utility Trenching 1 6 4 <1 <1 <1 Fine Grading 4 23 17 <1 5 2 Building Construction - 2014 2 15 9 <1 1 1 Building Construction - 2015 2 14 9 <1 1 1 Paving 2 12 8 <1 1 1 Architectural Coatings 50 3 2 <1 <1 <1 Finishing/Landscaping 2 14 9 <1 1 1 Phase 2 Site Preparation 2 15 8 <1 1 1 Rough Grading 2 13 10 <1 1 1 Utility Trenching 1 5 4 <1 <1 <1 Fine Grading 2 12 10 <1 1 1 Building Construction - 2015 2 14 9 <1 1 1 Building Construction – 2016 1 14 8 <1 1 1 Architectural Coatings 18 2 2 <1 <1 <1 Finishing/Landscaping 1 14 8 <1 1 1 All Phases Maximum Daily Emissions 543 304 193 <1 125 35 SCAQMD Regional Construction Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Significant? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod, Version 2013.2. Totals may not total to 100 percent due to rounding. Notes: 1 Construction phasing is based on the preliminary information provided by the applicant. Where specific information regarding project-related construction activities was not available, construction assumptions were based on CalEEMod defaults, which are based on construction surveys conducted by SCAQMD of construction equipment and phasing for comparable projects. 2 Includes implementation of fugitive dust control measures required by SCAQMD under Rule 403, including watering disturbed areas a minimum of two times per day, reducing speed limit to 15 miles per hour on unpaved surfaces, replacing ground cover quickly, and street sweeping with Rule 1186-compliant sweepers. Modeling also assumes a VOC of 100 g/L for interior paints pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 1113, which requires primers to be 100 g/L of VOC and flat coats to have 50 g/L of VOC. 3 From the overlap of Phase 1Architectural Coatings, Paving and Finishing/Landscaping phases. 4 From the overlap of Phase 2 Building Construction, Architectural Coatings and Finishing/Landscaping phases 5 From Phase 1 Demolition phase Long-Term Operation-Related Air Quality Impacts Long-term air pollutant emissions generated by the project would be generated by area sources (landscape fuel use, aerosols, and architectural coatings), energy use (natural gas used for heating), and the additional vehicle trips generated during an event. The project involves reorientation of the music and weight building on-site, construction of a new baseball building, and modernization of the existing aquatic center on-site, including construction of bleacher seating for 450 spectators. Operation of the proposed project would result in similar levels of criteria air pollutants from natural gas use and area sources onsite from the music building, weight room, and aquatic center. However, there are a couple of new structures onsite associated with the 4,500 square foot aquatic center and 3,695 square foot baseball building in area, would consume energy for interior heating and cooling. In addition, the new 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 67 bleacher seating would result in an increase of 165 trips (see Section 3.16, Transportation/Traffic) during a stadium event. The aquatic center is expected to host 52 full capacity events per year. Table 4 identifies criteria air pollutant emissions from the proposed project. As shown in Table 4, the net increase in project-related air pollutant emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD’s regional emissions thresholds for operational activities. Therefore, long-term operation-related impacts to air quality would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. Table 4 Net Increase in Maximum Daily Regional Operational Emissions Phase Criteria Air Pollutants (lbs/day) VOC NOX CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Energy <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Transportation 2 1 7 <1 2 <1 Total 3 1 7 <1 2 <1 SCAQMD Regional Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Significant? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod Version 2013.2. Based on highest winter or summer emissions. Totals may not total to 100 percent due to rounding. Modeling is conservative because it does not net out the reduction in criteria air pollutant emissions associated with energy use, area sources, and mobile sources from the 4 existing residential buildings that would be demolished as part of the project. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Less Than Significant Impact. The SoCAB is designated as nonattainment for O3 and PM2.5 under the California and National AAQS, and nonattainment for PM10, NOX, and lead (Los Angeles County only) under the California AAQS.2 According to SCAQMD methodology, any project that does not exceed or can be mitigated to less than the daily threshold values would not add significantly to a cumulative impact (SCAQMD 1993). Construction activities would not result in emissions in excess of SCAQMD’s significant thresholds. Likewise, the net increase in operational activities would not exceed SCAQMD’s significance thresholds. Therefore, the project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase in criteria pollutants and impacts would be less than significant with mitigation incorporated. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project could expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it would cause or contribute significantly to elevated pollutant concentration levels. Unlike the mass construction and operational emissions (lbs per day) shown in Table 3 and Table 4, localized concentrations refer to the amount of pollutant in a volume of air (ppm or μg/m3) and can be correlated to potential health effects. 2 California Air Resources Board (CARB) based on 2010 State Area Designations, current as of March 25, 2010, and National Area Designations, current as of February 2009. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 68  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Construction LSTs Localized significance thresholds (LSTs) are based on the CAAQS, which are the most stringent AAQS that have been established to provide a margin of safety in the protection of public health and welfare. They are designated to protect those sensitive receptors most susceptible to further respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and people engaged in strenuous work or exercise. Construction LSTs are based on the area being disturbed at the project site during each construction sub phase, distance to the nearest sensitive receptor, and Source Receptor Area (SRA). The nearest receptors proximate to the project site are the onsite school facilities and residents across from the High School. Air pollutant emissions generated by construction activities are anticipated to cause temporary increases in air pollutant concentrations. Table 5 shows the maximum daily construction emissions (pounds per day) generated during onsite construction activities compared with the SCAQMD’s LSTs for phases. Table 5 Localized Construction Emissions Source Onsite Criteria Air Pollutants (lb/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Phase 1 - Demolition Demolition – Phase 1 12 9 4 1 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 98 600 5 3 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? – Demolition Phase 1 No No No No Phase 1 – Site Preparation Site Preparation – Phase 1 14 7 1 1 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 81 485 4 3 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? Site Preparation Phase 1 No No No No Phase 1 – Grading and Trenching Rough Grading – Phase 1 12 9 1 1 Fine Grading – Phase 1 12 9 1 1 Trenching Utilities Phase 1 5 3 <1 <1 Overlap of Trenching and Rough Grading 18 12 2 1 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 98 600 5 3 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? – Grading and Trenching Phase 1 No No No No Phase 1 – Building Construction Building Construction 2014 – Phase 1 15 8 1 1 Building Construction 2015 – Phase 1 14 8 1 1 Paving 2015 – Phase 1 12 7 1 1 Architectural Coatings 2015 – Phase 1 3 2 <1 <1 Finishing/Landscaping 2015 – Phase 1 14 8 1 1 Overlap of Building Construction, Paving and Architectural Coatings (2015) – Phase 1 29 17 2 2 Overlap of Paving, Architectural Coatings and Finishing/Landscaping (2015) – Phase 2 29 17 2 2 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 81 485 4 3 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 69 Table 5 Localized Construction Emissions Source Onsite Criteria Air Pollutants (lb/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? No No No No Phase 2 – Site Preparation Site Preparation – Phase 2 14 7 1 1 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 81 485 4 3 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? – Site Preparation Phase 2 No No No No Phase 2 – Grading Rough Grading – Phase 2 12 9 1 1 Fine Grading – Phase 2 12 9 1 1 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? No No No No Phase 2 – Building Construction Building Construction 2015 – Phase 2 14 8 1 1 Building Construction 2016 – Phase 2 14 8 1 1 Architectural Coatings 2016 – Phase 2 2 2 <1 <1 Finishing/Landscaping 2016 – Phase 2 14 8 1 1 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 81 485 4 3 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? – Building Construction Phase 2 No No No No Overlap of Building Construction, Architectural Coatings and Finishing/Landscaping (2016) – Phase 2 30 18 2 2 SCAQMD Localized Significance Threshold 115 715 6 4 Exceeds Localized Significance Screening Criteria? – Building Construction Phase 2 No No No No Source: CalEEMod Version 2013.2, and SCAQMD, Localized Significance Methodology, 2006, October, Appendix A. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, only on-site stationary sources and mobile equipment occurring on the project site are included in the analysis. Demolition Phase: LSTs are based on 1.50 acres disturbed per day with receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). Site Preparation Phase: LSTs are based on 1.0 acres disturbed per day with receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). Rough Grading Phase: LSTs are based on 1.5 acres disturbed per day with receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). Fine Grading Phase: LSTs are based on 1.5 acres disturbed per day with receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). Trenching Phase: LSTs are based on 1.0 acres disturbed per day with receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). Building Construction: LSTs are based on 1.0 acres disturbed per day with receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). 1 Construction phasing is based on the preliminary information provided by the applicant. Where specific information regarding project-related construction activities was not available, construction assumptions were based on CalEEMod defaults, which are based on construction surveys conducted by SCAQMD of construction equipment and phasing for comparable projects. 2 Includes implementation of fugitive dust control measures required by SCAQMD under Rule 403, including watering disturbed areas a minimum of three times per day, reducing speed limit to 15 miles per hour on unpaved surfaces, replacing ground cover quickly, and street sweeping with Rule 1186-compliant sweepers. Modeling also assumes a VOC of 100 g/L for interior paints pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 1113, which requires primers to be 100 g/L of VOC and flat coats to have 50 g/L of VOC. As shown in the table, maximum daily construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD LSTs. Hence, mitigation measures are not necessary to reduce localized emissions from this project. Therefore, impacts to regional air quality from project related construction activities would be less than significant. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 70  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Operational LSTs Operation of the proposed project would not generate substantial quantities of emission from onsite, stationary sources. Land uses that have the potential to generate substantial stationary sources of emissions that would require a permit from SCAQMD include industrial land uses, such as chemical processing, and warehousing operations where substantial truck idling could occur onsite. The proposed project does not fall within these categories of uses. While operation of the proposed project would possibly result in the use of standard onsite mechanical equipment, air pollutant emissions generated from operation of this system would be nominal (see Table 2). Therefore, localized air quality impacts related to stationary-source emissions would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. Carbon Monoxide Hotspots Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create pockets of CO called hot spots. These pockets have the potential to exceed the state one-hour standard of 20 parts per million (ppm) or the eight-hour standard of 9.0 ppm. Because CO is produced in greatest quantities from vehicle combustion and does not readily disperse into the atmosphere, adherence to ambient air quality standards is typically demonstrated through an analysis of localized CO concentrations. Hot spots are typically produced at intersections, where traffic congestion is highest because vehicles queue for longer periods and are subject to reduced speeds. The SoCAB has been designated as attainment under both the national and California AAQS for CO. Under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal mixing is substantially limited—in order to generate a significant CO impact (BAAQMD 2011). The proposed project would generate 165 average daily trips during a full capacity event (City of Anaheim Parking Study 2011). Therefore, the project would not have the potential to substantially increase CO hotspots at intersections in the vicinity of the project site. Localized air quality impacts related to mobile-source emissions would therefore be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. Air Quality Compatibility/Health Risk The project would expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it would place the project in an area with pollutant concentrations above ambient concentrations in the SoCAB. Recent air pollution studies have shown an association between proximity to major air pollution sources and a variety of health effects, which are attributed to a high concentration of air pollutants. Guidance from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the California Air Pollutant Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA) recommends the evaluation of vehicle-generated emissions when freeways are within 500 feet of sensitive land uses (i.e., residences, schools, daycare centers, and hospitals). The project site is approximately 1,200 feet from Interstate 5 (I-5) and would be outside of the 500-foot buffer distance. In addition, the proposed project would not introduce a new sensitive use as the site is currently a school site with several facilities that the proposed project would be upgrading. Therefore the health risk from I-5 is considered less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 71 e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project would not emit objectionable odors that would affect a substantial number of people. The threshold for odor is if a project creates an odor nuisance pursuant to SCAQMD Rule 402, Nuisance, which states: A person shall not discharge from any source whatsoever such quantities of air contaminants or other material which cause injury, detriment, nuisance, or annoyance to any considerable number of persons or to the public, or which endanger the comfort, repose, health or safety of any such persons or the public, or which cause, or have a natural tendency to cause, injury or damage to business or property. The provisions of this rule shall not apply to odors emanating from agricultural operations necessary for the growing of crops or the raising of fowl or animals. The type of facilities that are considered to have objectionable odors include wastewater treatments plants, compost facilities, landfills, solid waste transfer stations, fiberglass manufacturing facilities, paint/coating operations (e.g., auto body shops), dairy farms, petroleum refineries, asphalt batch plants, chemical manufacturing, and food manufacturing facilities. Schools are not associated with foul odors that constitute a public nuisance. During construction activities, construction equipment exhaust, application of asphalt and architectural coatings would temporarily generate odors. Any construction-related odor emissions would be temporary and intermittent in nature. Additionally, noxious odors would be confined to the immediate vicinity of the construction equipment. By the time such emissions reach any sensitive receptor sites, they would be diluted to well below any level of air quality concern. Furthermore, short-term construction-related odors are expected to cease upon the drying or hardening of the odor-producing materials. Therefore, impacts associated with operation-construction-generated odors would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. 3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. Special status species include those listed as endangered or threatened under the federal Endangered Species Act or California Endangered Species Act; species otherwise given certain designations by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife; and plant species listed as rare by the California Native Plant Society. Occurrences of eight sensitive species in the Anaheim quadrangle are documented on the California Natural Diversity Database: six plant species, one reptile, and one mammal (CDFW 2013). The project site is completely developed with school and residential uses. There is no native habitat, and no suitable habitat for sensitive species, onsite. Use of the site by sensitive species does not occur on-site by athletic use of the baseball and football/soccer fields, and by periodic maintenance activities including mowing. No impact would occur. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 72  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? No Impact. Sensitive natural communities are natural communities that are considered rare in the region by regulatory agencies; that are known to provide habitat for sensitive animal or plant species; or are known to be important wildlife corridors. Riparian habitats are those occurring along the banks of rivers and streams. The project site is completely developed with school and residential uses, and there are no sensitive natural communities or riparian habitats onsite. No impact would occur. c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? No Impact. Wetlands are defined under the federal Clean Water Act as land that is flooded or saturated by surface water or groundwater at a frequency and duration sufficient to support, and that normally does support, a prevalence of vegetation adapted to life in saturated soils. Wetlands include areas such as swamps, marshes, and bogs. The project site is entirely developed with urban land uses. Any surface wetlands that could have been present when the site was developed would have been removed by site grading and construction. The nearest wetlands to the site mapped on the National Wetlands Mapper are in a percolation basin next to the south side of Carbon Creek, and next to the southwest side of the I- 5, about 1,200 feet to the southwest (USFWS 2013). No impact would occur. d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would remove ornamental landscape trees, on five residential lots in the aquatics center site, which could be used for nesting by migratory birds protected under the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA).3 Regulations implementing the MBTA are set forth in Code of Federal Regulations Title 50 Parts 20 through 22. Compliance with the MBTA generally involves one of two options: 1), avoiding disturbance of vegetation that could be used for nesting by migratory birds during the breeding season, generally March 1 through August 31; or, if vegetation is disturbed during that period, a site survey for nesting birds by a qualified biologist before commencement of grading activities. If nesting birds are found, the applicant would consult with the USFWS regarding means to avoid or minimize impacts to nesting birds. The project would comply with regulations implementing the MBTA, and impacts would be less than significant. e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? No Impact. The City of Anaheim does not have an ordinance protecting trees on private property with the exception of the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay zone in the area of the City east of the SR-55 freeway. Anaheim Municipal Ordinance Chapter 13.12, Street Trees, prohibits interference – such as trimming, removal, or spraying - with street trees without a permit from the City Director of Community Services. The project is not located within the SC Overlay zone and would not interfere with street trees; therefore, no impact would occur. 3 United States Code, Title 16, Sections 703-712. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 73 f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is not in the plan area of a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan (USFWS 2013b; CDFW 2013), and no impact would occur. 3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in § 15064.5? No Impact. Section 15064.5 defines historic resources as resources listed or determined to be eligible for listing by the State Historical Resources Commission, a local register of historical resources, or the lead agency. Generally a resource is considered to be “historically significant,” if it meets one of the following criteria: i) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; ii) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; iii) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; or iv) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. Servite High School opened in 1958. The high school site is shown as cultivated with orchards in a 1953 aerial photograph (NETR 2013). The school site is shown as vacant in an 1896 topographic map; a 1935 topographic map shows one structure next to the north boundary of the future school; and a 1950 topographic map shows two structures next to the north boundary and one structure next to the south boundary (USGS 1896; USGS 1935; USGS 1950). The site of the aquatic center is shown as developed on a 1965 topographic map (USGS 1965) and 1972 aerial photograph; however, is shown as cultivated with orchards in a 1953 aerial photograph (NETR 2013); thus, the houses on the aquatic center site were developed between 1953 and 1965. Neither Servite High School nor any of the four affected residences and one vacant lot are listed on the National Register of Historic Places or as a California Historical Landmark or California Point of Historical Interest (NPS 2013; OHP 2013). The project would remove the existing music room, weight room, and swimming pool on the Servite campus; and would demolish four houses. The project would not demolish or substantially alter other buildings. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to § 15064.5? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. The project site is not in an area designated as sensitive for prehistoric archaeological resources. Grading of the aquatics center site could extend deeper than that done for construction of the existing residences on that site. The project would excavate and remove the swimming pool on campus. Prehistoric archaeological resources could be present in subsurface site soils, and could be damaged by project ground-disturbing activities. This impact is potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 4 would reduce this impact to less than significant. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 74  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 4. Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? Less Than Significant Impact With Mitigation Incorporated. Paleontological resources are fossils, that is, evidence of past life. Soils beneath the site are young alluvial fan deposits of Holocene and late Pleistocene age (USGS 2006). The project site is in the Santa Ana Valley – Capistrano Valley geologic province of Orange County. Pleistocene-age sediments in the Santa Ana Valley – Capistrano Valley geologic province have yielded a variety of terrestrial ice-age mammal fossils such as mammoth, bison, horse, camel, and sloth, and also a variety of birds (Cooper 2011). Fossils could be buried in site soils, and project ground-disturbing activities could damage fossils. This impact is potentially significant. Implementation of Mitigation Measure 5 would reduce this impact to less than significant. 5. Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 75 c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Less Than Significant Impact. California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5 requires that in the event that human remains are discovered within the project site, disturbance of the site shall halt and remain halted until the coroner has conducted an investigation into the circumstances, manner, and cause of any death, and the recommendations concerning the treatment and disposition of the human remains have been made to the person responsible for the excavation, or to his or her authorized representative. If the coroner determines that the remains are not subject to his or her authority and if the coroner recognizes or has reason to believe the human remains to be those of a Native American, he or she shall contact, by telephone within 24 hours, the Native American Heritage Commission. The project would comply with existing law, and potential impacts to human remains would be less than significant. 3.6 GEOLOGY AND SOILS a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning map, issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. No Impact. The Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act was passed to prevent construction of buildings used for human occupancy on the surface of active faults, in order to minimize the hazard of surface rupture of a fault to people and buildings. Before cities and counties can permit development within Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones, geologic investigations are required to show that the sites are not threatened by surface rupture from future earthquakes. Active earthquake faults are faults where surface rupture has occurred within the last 11,000 years. The nearest Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone to the site is along an unnamed fault about four miles north of the site. The nearest active fault to the site mapped by the California Geological Survey is the aforementioned fault (CGS 1991). Project development would not cause hazards arising from surface rupture of a known active fault, and no impact would occur. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Less Than Significant Impact. Active faults in the region include the fault mentioned in Section 3.6.a.i; the Whittier Fault about 7.5 miles north of the site; and the Newport-Inglewood Fault about 10.5 miles southwest of the site (CGS 2013). The estimated peak ground acceleration at the site due to an earthquake with a 10 percent chance of exceedance in 50 years, that is, an average return period of 475 years, is 0.35g, where g is the acceleration of gravity (CGS 1997). Ground acceleration of 0.35g corresponds with intensity VIII on the Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale (Wald 1999), a subjective scale of how earthquakes are felt by people and the effects of earthquakes on buildings. The MMI Scale is a 12-point scale where Intensity I earthquakes are generally not felt by people; in Intensity XII earthquakes damage is total, and objects are thrown into the air. In an intensity VIII earthquake, damage is slight in specially designed structures; considerable damage occurs in 3. Environmental Analysis Page 76  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 ordinary substantial buildings with partial collapse; and damage is great in poorly built structures. Chimneys, factory stacks, columns, monuments, and walls fall, and heavy furniture is overturned (USGS 2012). Structures for human occupancy must be designed to meet or exceed 2010 California Building Code (California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2) standards for earthquake resistance. The CBC contains provisions for earthquake safety based on factors including occupancy type, the types of soil and rock onsite, and the strength of ground motion with specified probability of occurring at the site. The geotechnical investigation for the project would calculate seismic design parameters, pursuant to CBC requirements, that must be used in the design of the proposed structures. The project would comply with CBC seismic safety requirements, and impacts would be less than significant. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction refers to loose, saturated sand or silt deposits that behave as a liquid and lose their load-supporting capability when strongly shaken. Loose granular soils and silts that are saturated by relatively shallow groundwater are susceptible to liquefaction. The project site is not in a zone of required investigation for liquefaction designated by the California Geological Survey (CGS 1998). The project geotechnical investigation would assess the potential for liquefaction in site soils and would provide any needed recommendations for reducing hazards from liquefaction. The project would be required to comply with recommendations in the geotechnical investigation. Impacts would be less than significant. iv) Landslides? No Impact. The project site and surroundings are nearly flat, with a west slope of about 0.3 percent grade. Project development would not cause landslide hazards, and no impact would occur. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Less Than Significant Impact. Project grading and construction activities would expose large amounts of soil, and thus could cause substantial soil erosion if effective erosion control measures were not used. The project would prepare and implement a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) pursuant to the General Construction Permit, Order No. 2012-0006-DWQ issued by the State Water Resources Control Board in 2012. The SWPPP would specify Best Management Practices (BMPs) that would be used by the project to minimize pollution of stormwater. Categories of BMPs are described below in Table 6. The project would comply with water quality regulations for construction projects, and impacts would be less than significant. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 77 Table 6 Construction BMPs Category Purpose Examples Erosion Controls Cover and/or bind soil surface, to prevent soil particles from being detached and transported by water or wind Mulch, geotextiles, mats, hydroseeding, earth dikes, swales Sediment Controls Filter out soil particles that have been detached and transported in water. Barriers such as straw bales, sandbags, fiber rolls, and gravel bag berms; desilting basin; cleaning measures such as street sweeping Wind Erosion Controls The aims and methods of wind erosion control are similar to those of erosion control described above. See Erosion Controls above. Tracking Controls Minimize the tracking of soil offsite by vehicles Stabilized construction roadways and construction entrances/exits; entrance/outlet tire wash. Non-Storm Water Management Controls Prohibit discharge of materials other than stormwater, such as discharges from the cleaning, maintenance, and fueling of vehicles and equipment. Conduct various construction operations, including paving, grinding, and concrete curing and finishing, in ways that minimize non-stormwater discharges and contamination of any such discharges. BMPs specifying methods for: paving and grinding operations; cleaning, fueling, and maintenance of vehicles and equipment; concrete curing; concrete finishing. Waste Management and Controls (i.e., good housekeeping practices) Management of materials and wastes to avoid contamination of stormwater. Spill prevention and control, stockpile management, and management of solid wastes and hazardous wastes. c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse? Less Than Significant Impact. Liquefaction hazards are addressed above in Section 3.6.a.iii. Lateral spreading is the downslope movement of surface sediment due to liquefaction in a subsurface layer. The potential for lateral spreading in site soils would be addressed in the project geotechnical investigation. The project site is not susceptible to landslide. Subsidence The major cause of ground subsidence is withdrawal of groundwater. The project site is above the Main Orange County Groundwater Basin (“Basin”); there is no evidence that subsidence within the Basin has caused structural damage in the area (OCWD 2009). Project development would not cause hazards related to ground subsidence. Collapsible Soils Collapsible soils shrink upon being wetted, being subject to a load, or under both conditions. The project geotechnical investigation would assess collapsibility of onsite soils and would provide any needed recommendations for reducing hazards from collapsible soils. Hazard impacts arising from unstable soils would be less than significant. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 78  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Less Than Significant Impact. Expansive soils shrink or swell as the moisture content decreases or increases; the shrinking or swelling can shift, crack, or break structures built on such soils. The project geotechnical investigation would assess expansion potential of onsite soils and would provide any needed recommendations for reducing hazards from expansive soils. Hazards arising from expansive soils would be a less than significant impact. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? No Impact. The project would include restrooms connected to sanitary sewers in the aquatics center and in the proposed building next to the baseball field. The project would not use alternative waste water disposal systems, and no impact would occur. 3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Scientists have concluded that human activities are contributing to global climate change by adding large amounts of heat-trapping gases, known as greenhouse gases (GHGs), into the atmosphere. The primary source of these GHG is fossil fuel use. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified four major GHG—water vapor, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and ozone (O3)—that are the likely cause of an increase in global average temperatures observed within the 20th and 21st centuries. Other GHG identified by the IPCC that contribute to global warming to a lesser extent include nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and chlorofluorocarbons.4 This section analyzes the project’s contribution to global climate change impacts in California through an analysis of project-related GHG emissions. Information on manufacture of cement, steel, and other “life- cycle” emissions that would occur as a result of the project are not applicable and are not included in the analysis.5 A background discussion on the GHG regulatory setting and GHG modeling can be found in Appendix C to this Initial Study. Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. 4 Water vapor (H2O) is the strongest GHG and the most variable in its phases (vapor, cloud droplets, ice crystals). However, water vapor is not considered a pollutant. 5 Life cycle emissions include indirect emissions associated with materials manufacture. However, these indirect emissions involve numerous parties, each of which is responsible for GHG emissions of their particular activity. The California Resources Agency, in adopting the CEQA Guidelines Amendments on GHG emissions found that lifecycle analyses was not warranted for project-specific CEQA analysis in most situations, for a variety of reasons, including lack of control over some sources, and the possibility of double-counting emissions (see Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action, December 2009). Because the amount of materials consumed during the operation or construction of the proposed project is not known, the origin of the raw materials purchased is not known, and manufacturing information for those raw materials are also not known, calculation of life cycle emissions would be speculative. A life-cycle analysis is not warranted (OPR 2008). 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 79 a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. . Global climate change is not confined to a particular project area and is generally accepted as the consequence of global industrialization over the last 200 years. A typical project, even a very large one, does not generate enough greenhouse gas emissions on its own to influence global climate change significantly; hence, the issue of global climate change is, by definition, a cumulative environmental impact. Annual GHG emissions were calculated for construction and operation of the project. Build out of the proposed project would result indirect and indirect GHG emissions from transportation, energy (natural gas use and purchased electricity from field lighting), area sources (landscape fuel use, aerosols, and architectural coatings), water use/wastewater generation, and solid waste generation. The project in addition to reorienting several facilities on-site would introduce to the project site, a new baseball building and a new aquatic complex with bleachers having a capacity to seat 450 people. For purposes of this analysis, 52 full capacity events (i.e., with 450 spectators are assumed to be held annually). Annual average construction emissions were amortized over 30 years and included in the emissions inventory to account for GHG emissions from the construction phase of the project. Project-related GHG emissions are shown in Table 7. For operation, the project’s GHG emissions are separated into emission sources for the applicable GHG emissions sectors. Table 7 Net Increase in Project-Related GHG Emissions Source MTCO2e/Year Percent of Project Total Area <1 <1% Energy 31 39% Mobile 34 43% Waste 1 1% Water 3 4% Amortized Construction Emissions1 10 13% Total 79 100% SCAQMD’s Proposed Screening Threshold 3,000 NA Exceeds Proposed Screening Threshold No NA Source: CalEEMod, Version 2013.2.1. Assumes implementation of the California Green Building Code and 2013 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards. Totals may not total to 100 percent due to rounding. Modeling is conservative because it does not net out the reduction in criteria air pollutant emissions associated with energy use, area sources, and mobile sources from the 4 existing residential buildings that would be demolished as part of the project. MTCO2e: metric tons of carbon dioxide-equivalent 1 Total construction emissions are amortized over 30 years. As shown in the table, the proposed project at build out would generate 79 metric tons (MTons) of GHG per year compared to existing conditions. The total GHG emissions onsite from the project would not exceed SCAQMD’s proposed bright-line screening threshold of 3,000 MTons.6 Because the GHG 6 This threshold is based on SCAQMD’s 3,000 MTons combined threshold proposed by SCAQMD’s Working Group, which is based on a survey of the GHG emissions inventory of CEQA projects. Approximately 90 percent of CEQA projects GHG emissions inventories exceed 3,000 MTons, which is based on a potential threshold approach cited in CAPCOA’s White Paper, CEQA and Climate Change. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 80  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 emissions associated with the project would not exceed SCAQMD’s screening threshold, the proposed project’s cumulative contribution to GHG emissions is less than significant. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Less Than Significant Impact. The California Air Resources Board’s (CARB) Scoping Plan is California’s GHG reduction strategy to achieve the state’s GHG emissions reduction target established by Assembly Bill (AB) 32, which is 1990 levels by year 2020. To estimate the reductions necessary, CARB projected statewide 2020 business-as-usual (BAU) GHG emissions and identified that the state as a whole would be required to reduce GHG emissions by 28.5 percent from year 2020 BAU to achieve the targets of AB 32 (CARB 2008). Since release of the 2008 Scoping Plan, CARB has updated the 2020 GHG BAU forecast to reflect GHG emissions in light of the economic downturn and measures not previously considered within the 2008 Scoping Plan baseline inventory. The revised BAU 2020 forecast shows that the state would have to reduce GHG emissions by 21.6 percent from BAU without Pavley and the 33 percent RPS or 15.7 percent from the adjusted baseline (i.e., with Pavley and 33 percent RPS) (CARB 2012). Statewide strategies to reduce GHG emissions include the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)7, California Appliance Energy Efficiency regulations, California Renewable Energy Portfolio standard, changes in the corporate average fuel economy (CAFE) standards, and other early action measures would ensure the state is on target to achieve the GHG emissions reduction goals of AB 32. In addition, new buildings constructed are required to comply with the 2013 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards and California Green Building Code (CALGreen). The project’s GHG emissions would be reduced from compliance with statewide measures that have been adopted since AB 32 was adopted. There would be potential reduction in energy use, since the project proposes to demolish the existing music and weight buildings, built according to older building standards and replace them with new buildings that are inherently more energy efficient and are built to comply with the 2013 standards. 7 On December 29, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued several rulings in the federal lawsuits challenging the LCFS. One of the court’s rulings preliminarily enjoins the CARB from enforcing the regulation during the pendency of the litigation. In January 2012, CARB appealed the decision and on April 23, 2012, the Night Circuit Court granted CARB’s motion for a stay of the injunction while it continues to consider CARB’s appeal of the lower court’s decision. 7 On September 24, 2009, the CARB adopted amendments to the “Pavley” regulations that reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions in new passenger vehicles from 2009 through 2016. These amendments are part of California’s commitment toward a nation-wide program to reduce new passenger vehicle GHGs from 2012 through 2016. CARB’s September amendments will cement California’s enforcement of the Pavley rule starting in 2009 while providing vehicle manufacturers with new compliance flexibility. The amendments will also prepare California to harmonize its rules with the federal rules for passenger vehicles (CARB 2013). 8 Established in 2002 under Senate Bill 1078, accelerated in 2006 under Senate Bill 107 and expanded in 2011 under Senate Bill 2, California's Renewables Portfolio Standard (RPS) is one of the most stringent renewable energy standards in the country. The RPS program requires investor-owned utilities, electric service providers, and community choice aggregators to increase procurement from eligible renewable energy resources to 33% of total procurement by 2020. 9 The 2012 RTP/SCS incorporates local land use projections and circulation networks in the cities’ and counties’ general plans. The projected regional development pattern—including location of land uses and residential densities in local general plans—when integrated with the proposed regional transportation network in the 2012 RTP/SCS, would reduce per capita vehicular travel-related GHG emissions and achieve the subregional GHG reduction per capita targets for the SCAG region. Key strategies identified in the Orange County subregional SCS that were incorporated into the 2012 RTP/SCS 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 81 In addition to AB 32, the California legislature passed Senate Bill 375 (SB 375) to connect regional transportation planning to land use decisions made at a local level. SB 375 requires the metropolitan planning organizations to prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) in their regional transportation plans to achieve the per capita GHG reduction targets. For the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) region, the SCS was adopted April 2012 (SCAG 2012). The SCS does not require that local general plans, specific plans, or zoning be consistent with the SCS, but provides incentives for consistency for governments and developers. The proposed project would only increase seating capacity and provide improvements to the existing high school stadium facility and would be consistent with the General Plan land use designations for the site and therefore consistent with the RTP/SCS. The proposed project would not have the potential to interfere with the State of California's or SCAG’s ability to achieve GHG reduction goals and strategies. No impact would occur and no mitigation measures are required. 3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use or disposal of hazardous materials? Less Than Significant Impact. Operation of the aquatics center would involve use of chlorine disinfectant. Chlorine disinfectant used for an Olympic-sized swimming pool would probably be in either liquid or tablet form. Chlorine tablets consist of trichloro-s-triazine-trione, a compound containing carbon, chlorine, oxygen, and nitrogen. Such tablets cause skin irritation, severe eye irritation, digestive tract burns, respiratory tract irritation, and can aggravate asthma, respiratory, and cardiovascular disease. Small amounts of water react with such tablets to form nitrogen trichloride, a violent explosive (GLB 2001). Health hazards of chlorine liquid are generally similar to those of chlorine tablets (Cleartech 2010). School staff handling swimming pool chemicals would receive appropriate training on use, storage, and disposal of such chemicals. Swimming pool chemicals would be used, handled, stored, and disposed in compliance with existing regulations of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, Division of Occupational Safety and Health, US Department of Transportation, and the Anaheim Fire and Rescue.8 Apart from swimming pool chemicals, project operation would use only small amounts of hazardous materials for cleaning and maintenance purposes, such as cleansers, paints, and pesticides. Project construction would use hazardous materials including fuels, lubricants, degreasers, solvents, paints, asphalt, and concrete curing materials. The use, storage, and disposal of such hazardous materials in project construction and operation would comply with existing regulations of the above- named agencies. Routine use of hazardous materials by the project would not cause significant hazards to the public or the environment, and impacts would be less than significant. b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Less Than Significant Impact. The use, storage, and disposal of hazardous materials by the project would comply with existing regulations of several agencies as described in the previous section. All project construction and operation workers would be trained on proper use, storage, and disposal of 8 Anaheim Fire & Rescue is the Certified Unified Program Agency (CUPA) for the City of Anaheim; the Certified Unified Program coordinates and makes consistent enforcement of several state and federal regulations governing hazardous materials. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 82  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 hazardous materials. During both project construction and project operation, the project would maintain supplies onsite for containing and cleaning small spills of hazardous materials. Project personnel would request assistance from Anaheim Fire & Rescue immediately in the event of a release of hazardous materials larger than onsite personnel were able to contain and clean up. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Less Than Significant Impact. The nearest existing school to the project site, apart from Servite High School, is John Marshall Elementary School at 2066 West Falmouth Drive in the City of Anaheim about 500 feet west of Servite High School. John Marshall Elementary School is undergoing remodeling and is operating at a temporary campus at 1010 South Harbor Boulevard in the City of Anaheim about 2.6 miles southeast of the project site; the school will resume operating at its permanent campus in the 2015-2016 school year (ACSD 2013). Chorine vapors from the pool would not pose a health hazard to persons off- site (Fitzgerald 2013). Project construction would be completed before John Marshall Elementary School is scheduled to resume operation near the project site. Emissions from project construction would not pose substantial health hazards to persons at John Marshall Elementary School even if that school were operating during project construction.9 Impacts would be less than significant. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? No Impact. California Government Code Section 65962.5 requires the compiling of lists of the following types of hazardous materials sites: hazardous waste facilities; hazardous waste discharges for which the State Water Quality Control Board has issued certain types of orders; public drinking water wells containing detectable levels of organic contaminants; underground storage tanks with reported unauthorized releases; and solid waste disposal facilities from which hazardous waste has migrated. Three hazardous materials databases were searched on June 5 2013: GeoTracker, maintained by the State Water Resources Control Board; EnviroStor, maintained by the Department of Toxic Substances Control; and EnviroMapper, maintained by the US Environmental Protection Agency. No hazardous materials site was listed on the project site, or on adjoining parcels. The project site is not included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to California Government Code Section 65962.5, and no impact would occur. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles or a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. The nearest airport to the project site is Fullerton Municipal Airport two miles to the northwest. The project site is outside of areas surrounding the airport where land uses and heights of structures are regulated by the Airport Environs Land Use Plan for the airport. The outer edge of the height restriction zone for the airport is about 0.5 mile northwest of Servite High School. The maximum allowable height of structures at the edge of the height restriction zone is 446 feet above mean sea level (amsl; P&D Aviation 2004). The baseball field is at an elevation of about 126 feet amsl, and the football/soccer filed is about 127 feet amsl. Eighty-foot field light poles over the football/soccer field would reach elevations of about 207 feet amsl, well within the allowed height limit 0.5 mile northwest of 9 Project construction would emit diesel fumes, which are considered to be carcinogenic. However, construction emissions are brief, and health hazards from emissions are assessed over a 70-year lifetime. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 83 the school. Project development would not cause hazards related to aircraft operating to or from Fullerton Municipal Airport, and no impact would occur. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? No Impact. There are no private airstrips or heliports closer to Servite High School than Fullerton Municipal Airport two miles to the northwest (Airnav.com 2013). The project would not cause any hazards related to aircraft operating to or from private airports or heliports, and no impact would occur. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? No Impact. The City of Anaheim Emergency Management Division is responsible for emergency response planning for the City. The project would not impair emergency responses, or block responses to Servite High School or to the surrounding community. No impact would occur. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? No Impact. No fire hazard severity zones are designated on or near the project site by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL FIRE 2011). The project site and surrounding land are entirely developed with urban land uses and do not contain wildland vegetation. The project would not expose people or structures to wildland fire hazards, and no impact would occur. 3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? No Impact. Waste discharge requirements for stormwater runoff from construction sites one acre or more in area in California are set forth in the General Construction Permit, SWRCB Order No. 2012-0006- DWQ discussed above in Section 3.6.b. Waste discharge requirements for discharges to municipal storm drainage systems in the part of Orange County within the Santa Ana River Watershed are set forth in Order No. R8-2009-0030 (“MS4 Permit”) issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board in 2009. A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) completed for the proposed Aquatics Center in May 2013 (Fuscoe Engineering 2013), included as Appendix F of this Initial Study, specifies Best Management Practices (BMPs) the project would use in project design and project operations to minimize stormwater pollution; the BMPs are described in Table 8 below. The project is in the Lower San Gabriel River watershed; receiving waters for the project site are Carbon Creek, Coyote Creek, Reach 1 of the San Gabriel River,10 and Los Alamitos Bay. Reach 1 of the San Gabriel River is listed on the 2010 Clean Water Act Section 303(d) List of Water Quality Impairments for dissolved oxygen and coliform bacteria. 10 Rivers and streams are divided into reaches, that is, sections, for water quality management. Reach 1 of the San Gabriel River extends from approximately Interstate 405 in the City of Long Beach (3.4 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean) to Firestone Boulevard in the City of Downey. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 84  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Water pollutant categories expected to be generated by the Aquatics Center are sediment, nutrients, heavy metals, pathogens, pesticides, oil & grease, toxic organic compounds, and trash and debris. The project would increase the impervious portion of the site from 56 percent to 74 percent of the site. The project would comply with requirements of the General Construction Permit and MS4 Permit through implementation of a SWPPP and WQMP, respectively. No impact would occur. Table 8 BMPs Included in Project WQMP BMP Description BMPs Used in Project Design Structural Source Control BMPs Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers. The Owner will be responsible for the installation and maintenance of all common landscape areas utilizing similar planting materials with similar water requirements to reduce excess irrigation runoff. The developer will be responsible for implementing all efficient irrigation systems for common area landscaping including but not limited to provisions for water sensors and programmable irrigation cycles. The irrigation systems shall be in conformance with water use efficiency guidelines. Site Design BMPs Minimize Impervious Area The project will increase impervious surfaces as compared to existing conditions. However, landscaping will be provided to the north of the building to direct flows from rooftops into landscaping features. Minimized Directly Connected impervious Areas Landscaping will be provided adjacent to sidewalk along the proposed building. Low-flows and first-flush runoff will drain to pervious pavement on the adjacent parking lot. Preserve Existing Drainage Patterns and Time of Concentration The project is part of an existing developed high school and drainage patters are already set and won’t be change. Treatment Control BMPs Permeable Pavement Permeable payment will used on the proposed parking lot to the west of the new aquatic building. Permeable pavement, such as permeable pavers, grass pavers, porous concrete, and porous asphalt, provides a surface suitable for light-loads and parking areas in which water can drain through pore spaces to an underlying rock reservoir (approximately 1-2 feet deep) underneath. The sub-surface base allows for physical and microbial filtering processes to take place thereby removing pollutants such as particulates, organics, hydrocarbons and total suspended sediments, including attached heavy metals. The porous pavement sections proposed for the project site will have a reservoir depth of 7 inches to achieve the minimum required treatment design volumes for each drainage area; the capacity of the porous pavement would be 1,280 cubic feet, that is, 9,600 gallons. The BMP shall be located at parking stalls of both parking lots. It is generally acknowledged that this treatment BMP is effective in treating the following pollutants: sediment and turbidity, organic compounds, trash and debris, oxygen demanding substance, bacteria and viruses, oil and grease. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 85 Table 8 BMPs Included in Project WQMP BMP Description BMPs Used in Project Operation Nonstructural Source Control BMPs Activity Restrictions The Owner shall develop ongoing activity restrictions that include those that have the potential to create adverse impacts on water quality. Activities include, but are not limited to: handling and disposal of contaminants, fertilizer and pesticide application restrictions, litter control and pick-up, and vehicle or equipment repair and maintenance in non- designated areas, as well as any other activities that may potentially contribute to water pollution. Common Area Landscape Management The Owner shall be responsible for ongoing maintenance and management of all landscaped areas on their property, consistent with OC DAMP Section 5.5, Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers as well as City standards. Program includes how to reduce the potential pollutant sources of fertilizer and pesticide uses, utilization of water- efficient landscaping practices, ongoing trimming and other landscape maintenance activities and proper disposal of landscape wastes by the owner and/or contractors. BMP Maintenance The Owner will be responsible for the implementation and maintenance of each applicable non-structural BMP, as well as scheduling inspections and maintenance of all applicable structural BMP facilities through its staff, landscape contractor, and/or any other necessary maintenance contractors. Details on BMP Maintenance are provided in Appendix B of this WQMP. Common Area Litter Control The Owner will be responsible for performing trash pick-up and sweeping of littered common areas on a weekly basis or whenever necessary, and proper disposal of waste collected. Responsibilities will also include investigating, noting and documenting improper disposal materials by the public. Employee Training All employees and any contractors will require training to ensure that employees are aware of maintenance activities that may result in pollutants reaching the storm drain. Training will include, but not be limited to, spill cleanup procedures, proper waste disposal, housekeeping practices, etc. Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Parking lots shall be swept quarterly at a minimum and prior to the rainy season, no later than October 1st each year. Source: Fuscoe Engineering 2013 b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not increase the enrollment of Servite High School and would not substantially increase water use by the school. The project site is not used for intentional groundwater recharge. The project would develop about 2.2 acres of impervious area in the aquatics center and at the proposed building next to the baseball field. The project would also remove some impervious area – buildings and driveways – on five residential parcels; thus, the net increase in impervious area would be less than 2.2 acres. Such addition of impervious area in a built-out urban 3. Environmental Analysis Page 86  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 region would not substantially decrease groundwater recharge or affect groundwater supplies. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in a substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Less Than Significant Impact. The drainage pattern near the project site is in streets westward to a storm drain in La Palma Avenue that begins just west of Brookhurst Street about 0.6 mile west of the site (OCFlood 2010). The project site would not change the drainage pattern on or near the site. Implementation of BMPs that would be specified in the project SWPPP and WQMP would ensure that the project did not cause substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site. Impacts would be less than significant. d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not change the drainage pattern on or near the project site. The project would be a priority project as defined in the MS4 Permit for the part of Orange County within the Santa Ana River Watershed, Order No. R8-2009-0030. Thus, the project would be required to infiltrate, harvest and re-use, evapotranspire, or biotreat onsite stormwater from the 85th percentile storm event, which is approximately equivalent to a two-year storm. The project would implement BMPs for retaining stormwater onsite as required. The project would not cause flooding on- or off-site, and impacts would be less than significant. e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned storm water drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would retain stormwater onsite to the extent required under the MS4 Permit, as described in the previous Section. The project would not exceed the capacity of storm drainage systems. Project water quality impacts are addressed above in Section 3.9.a. Impacts would be less than significant. f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Less Than Significant Impact. Project water quality impacts would be less than significant, as substantiated above in Section 3.9.a. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? No Impact. The project site is in Shaded Zone X mapped by the Federal Emergency Management Agency, indicating that the site is in an area protected by levees from 100-year floods, or in an area with estimated flood depths less than one foot (FEMA 2009). The project would not develop housing. No impact would occur. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 87 h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? No Impact. The project site is outside of 100-year flood zones, and no impact would occur. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is in the dam inundation area of Prado Dam (CalEMA 2007), which is 18 miles east of the project site on the Santa Ana River. Prado Dam is owned and operated by the Los Angeles District of the Army Corps of Engineers and was completed in 1941. It provides flood control and groundwater recharge capability for Orange County. The dam is on the Santa Ana River about two miles west of the City of Corona near the head of Santa Ana Canyon. Its primary purpose is to reduce the risk of damage from floods in the metropolitan areas of Orange County, and it was built after a catastrophic flood on the Santa Ana River in 1938. Prado Dam is an earth-fill dam with a height of 106 feet and a reservoir capacity of 217,000 acre-feet. Its functioning capacity was recently increased due to the construction of the Seven Oaks Dam, which was completed in 1999 and is approximately 40 miles upstream on the Santa Ana River. During a flood, Seven Oaks Dam will store water destined for Prado Dam for as long as the reservoir pool at Prado Dam is rising. When the flood threat at Prado Dam has passed, Seven Oaks Dam will begin to release its stored flood water at a rate that does not exceed the downstream channel capacity. Working in tandem, the Prado and Seven Oaks Dams provide increased protection to Orange County. Flood protection improvements along the Santa Ana River are being implemented as part of the Santa Ana River Mainstem Project (SARMP), including improvements to Prado Dam:  Raising the dam height 28.4 feet  Constructing a new outlet works to more than triple the existing outlet capacity  Raising the concrete spillway 20 feet  Constructing levees or dikes in the basin to protect properties  Stabilizing approximately 1.5 miles of bluff along the Santa Ana River downstream of the Interstate 15 bridge in Norco These improvements will increase Prado Dam’s current 70-year level of protection to 190-year protection and will increase the reservoir capacity from 217,000 to 362,000 acre-feet. In addition, the downstream channel capacity of the Santa Ana River will be increased from 9,350 cubic feet per second (cfs) to approximately 30,000 cfs, thus further reducing the potential for flooding (CCCD 2012). All work on the Santa Ana River Channel is scheduled for completion in 2014, and all work on Prado Dam is scheduled for completion by 2018. Completion of these projects will significantly reduce flood risks on the Santa Ana River and the potential for flood inundation from Prado Dam. The Army Corps of Engineers is also planning to update the dam inundation maps by 2020 (USACE 2013). The latest available dam inundation map for Prado Dam was produced in 1985 by the Army Corps of Engineers (USACE 1985). Note that this map was prepared prior to all of the improvements to the dam and the Santa Ana River and therefore overestimates the flood potential and dam inundation area. The peak outflow of the hypothetical flood wave would be contained within Santa Ana Canyon and then 3. Environmental Analysis Page 88  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 spread out across the alluvial plain to encompass an area more than 10 miles wide in the vicinity of the school site. The nearest cross-section to the school site shows that the first arrival time of the flood wave would be approximately 4.5 hours with a maximum depth of flow of 6 feet at 5.25 hours. The school site is only 1.6 miles from the edge of the inundation zone. Completed and planned improvements to the Santa Ana River would reduce flood height at the project site. Also, with the scheduled improvements, it is highly unlikely that the dam would fail catastrophically, and in the remote case that it did fail, a flood wave arrival time of 4.5 to 5.25 hours would be sufficient for evacuation (TPC 2012). Impacts would be less than significant. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? No Impact. Seiche A seiche is a surface wave created when an inland water body is shaken, usually by an earthquake. There are no inland bodies of water close enough to the project site to pose a flood hazard to the site due to a seiche. Tsunami A tsunami is a sea wave caused by a sudden displacement of the ocean floor, most often due to earthquakes. The project site is at an elevation of about 126 feet amsl, and is about 11 miles inland from the Pacific Ocean. The project would not cause flood hazards arising from a tsunami. Mudflow A mudflow is a landslide composed of saturated rock debris and soil with a consistency of wet cement. There are no slopes in or near the project site that could generate a mudflow; the project site and surrounding areas are nearly flat, with a west slope of about 0.3 percent grade. No impact would occur. 3.10 LAND USE AND PLANNING a) Physically divide an established community? No Impact. The project site would not divide an established community. Replacement of five single- family houses along Keystone Street with an aquatics center would not impede access between remaining residences it the neighborhood west of the school, as the five houses are on private properties that do not provide access between other parts of the neighborhood. Servite High School has been on its site since 1958; the proposed on-campus improvements would have no impact on access between neighborhoods on various sides of the campus. No impact would occur. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed aquatics center use is permitted in the RS-2 Zone with a CUP; the project includes an application for a CUP to the City of Anaheim. Educational institutions are permitted in the T (Transition) zone with a CUP; the requested CUP would also permit the retention of existing student enrollment higher than that permitted under previous entitlements, as well as the 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 89 proposed improvements within the existing campus. The project would not conflict with plans, policies, or regulations aimed at avoiding or reducing an environmental effect, and impacts would be less than significant. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? No Impact. The project site is not in the plan area of a Habitat Conservation Plan or Natural Community Conservation Plan (USFWS 2013b; CDFW 2013), and no impact would occur. 3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be a value to the region and the residents of the state? No Impact. The project site is designated Mineral Resource Zone 3 (MRZ-3) by the California Geological Survey, indicating that it is in an area containing mineral deposits but the significance of deposits cannot be evaluated from available data (CGS 1994). The project site is developed with a high school and residences, and is not available for mining. No impact would occur. b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? No Impact. No active or inactive mines are mapped on or near the project site by the Office of Mine Reclamation (OMR 2013), or the US Geological Survey (USGS 2013). The project would not cause the loss of availability of a known current or past mining site, and no impact would occur. 3.12 NOISE Noise is defined as unwanted sound, and is known to have several adverse effects on people, including hearing loss, speech and sleep interference, physiological responses, and annoyance. Based on these known adverse effects of noise, the federal government, the State of California, and the City of Anaheim, under City of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 6.70, have established criteria to protect public health and safety and to prevent disruption of certain human activities. Characterization of noise and vibration, existing regulations, and calculations for construction noise and vibration levels can be found in Appendix D to this Initial Study. Terminology  Decibel (dB). A unitless measure of sound on a logarithmic scale, which indicates the squared ratio of sound pressure amplitude to a reference sound pressure amplitude. The reference pressure is 20 micropascals.  A-Weighted Decibel (dBA). An overall frequency-weighted sound level in decibels which approximates the frequency response of the human ear.  Equivalent Continuous Noise Level (Leq). The mean of the noise level averaged over the measurement period, regarded as an average level.  Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL). The energy average of the A-weighted sound levels occurring during a 24-hour period, with 5 dB added to the A-weighted sound levels 3. Environmental Analysis Page 90  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 occurring during the period from 7 to 10 PM and 10 dB added to the A-weighted sound levels occurring during the period from 10 PM to 7 AM. Existing Noise Environment A baseline noise survey was conducted from August 2, 2012 to August 3, 2012 to measure the existing noise levels around the Project site. Three residential locations nearby the project site were selected for the survey. The three receiver locations were 954 N Keystone St on the left side of the house (NM1), 934 N Keystone St in the backyard (NM2), and 951 N Keystone St on the left side of the house behind the fence (NM3) (see Figure 20, Ambient Noise Measurement Locations) The background noise at each receiver location was measured continuously over a 24-hour period to document baseline conditions. At location NM1, the Leq ranged from 40.8 to 58.3 dBA. At locations NM2 and NM3, the Leq ranged from 40.5 to 57.8 dBA and 44.0 to 56.2 dBA, respectively. The types of sources that contributed to the baseline data included vehicle traffic, aircraft, wild life (birds and dogs) and residential activity. Table 9 summarizes the Leq, Lmax and Lmin measured at each location. Refer to Figure 20 for the location of the noise measurements and to the Appendix for the complete set of measurement data. Table 9 Ambient Noise Measurements, 24 Hours, August 2 – August 3, 2012 Location Range of Leq Lmax Lmin Description 954 N Keystone St on the left side of the house (NM1) 40.8 - 58.3 86.4 36.6 Community and freeway traffic; aircraft; community and wildlife noise 934 N Keystone St in the backyard (NM2) 40.5 - 57.8 80.0 36.6 Community and freeway traffic; aircraft; community and wildlife noise 951 N Keystone St on the left side of the house behind the fence (NM3) 44.0 - 56.2 81.8 35.5 Community and freeway traffic; aircraft; community and wildlife noise; faint music Source: AGI 2012 a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less Than Significant Impact. City of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 6.70 prohibits sound at a property line of amplitude 60 decibels (60 dB) or greater. Construction noise is exempt from this prohibition during the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM. Operational Noise The Campus Expansion Project would construct a new Aquatics Complex, bleachers for the Baseball field, and realign the Baseball field. Typical noise sources associated with the Project include swimming, batting cages, swimming meets, baseball games, crowds, and people cheering. AGI analyzed the future noise levels from the campus expansion project using geometrics from the project drawings and our database of recreation noise sources. Noise data from batting cages was also obtained to supplement the modeling data. The operations noise was analyzed at five receiver locations that immediately border the Project site. Receivers R1 through R5 are shown in Figure 21, Receiver Locations Used in Project Noise Analysis. Table 10 summarizes the noise source data used for the analysis. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 91 Table 10 Noise Source Data Used in the Analysis Source Distance from Source, ft A-Weighted Sound Level, dBA Swimming Pool 75 57 Baseball Game 83 58 Batting Cage 45 73 Parking Lot 30 63 Crowd Noise 105 67 Source: AGI 2012 The CadnaA Acoustical Model was used to simulate the layout of the project. Noise source data from Table 10 was inputted into the model along with the relative location of the sources, receivers and intervening structures. The results of the analysis are shown in Table 11. When compared with the City’s Noise Ordinance Standard of 60 dBA, future noise from Aquatics Complex and Baseball Facility operations would be below the noise standard, as shown in Table 11. Noise from the Servite High School Expansion Project would not impact the surrounding residential properties and would be less than significant. Table 11 Predicted Aquatics Complex and Baseball Operations Noise Levels Receiver Predicted Operations Noise Level, Leq, dBA Noise Ordinance Standard, dBA Significant Impact? R1 51.4 60 No R2 56.8 60 No R3 54.8 60 No R4 59.2 60 No R5 57.4 60 No Source: AGI 2012 Construction Noise Construction of the Project would occur in three fairly distinct phases: (1) ground demolition; (2) Rough building construction; and (3) finishing and cleanup. Each phase involves the use of different kinds of construction equipment and, therefore, has its own distinct noise characteristics. Demolition usually involves a backhoe and crane. Building construction typically involves the use of two drill rigs, one backhoe, one mobile crane, an extended boom forklift, hammers, generators, compressors, and light trucks. Finishing and site cleanup generally include trucks, landscape rollers, and compactors. Typical noise level ranges associated with each construction phase at a distance of 50 feet from the noise source are presented in Table 12. All three phases would have the potential to generate noise levels exceeding ambient conditions. The highest and generally most sustained noise levels typically occur during the demolition and rough construction phases. Construction noise may be a short-term annoyance to the nearest residences that border the Project site; however, construction operations are exempt from compliance with the noise ordinance during the hours of 7 AM to 7 PM. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 92  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Table 12 Typical Noise Levels at Construction Sites Construction Activity Noise Level (dBA) at 50 feet Demolition 89 Rough Building Construction 88 Finish Construction 87 Source: AGI 2012 Noise control measures over and above the existing project design would not be required for the project. Construction operations should be limited to the hours of 7 AM to 7 PM to ensure compliance with the noise standards. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction Based on the FTA vibration criteria, vibration annoyance impacts are considered significant when average vibration levels produced by construction equipment would produce excessive levels of vibration (78 VdB) during the daytime at offsite vibration-sensitive structures. In addition, the vibration level at which there is a risk of architectural damage is based on the FTA criteria of 0.2 peak particle velocity (PPV) measured in inches per second (in/sec) for typical wood-framed buildings or 0.5 PPV in/sec for reinforced concrete, steel, or timber structures. Construction activities, however, can generate varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the construction procedures, the equipment used, and the proximity to vibration-sensitive uses. Operation of construction equipment generates vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in amplitude with distance from the source. The effect on buildings near a construction site varies depending on soil type, ground strata, and receptor building construction. The generation of vibration can range from no perceptible effects at the lowest vibration levels, to low rumbling sounds and perceptible vibrations at moderate levels, to slight damage at the highest levels. Ground vibrations from construction activities rarely reach levels that can damage structures, but can achieve levels in buildings close to a construction site that are in the perceptible ranges (FTA 2006). Rock blasting and impact pile-driving generate the highest levels of vibration. However, construction for this project would not require impact pile-driving or blasting. Ambient Noise Measurement Locations Source: AGI 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 20 0 Scale (Feet) 200 Existing School Boundary 3. Environmental Analysis Campus Expansion N Wichita StW Catalpa Ave W Dogwood Ave N Keystone StNM 1 NM 2 NM 3 3. Environmental Analysis Page 94  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Receiver Locations Used in Project Noise Analysis Source: AGI 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 21 0 Scale (Feet) 200 Existing School Boundary 3. Environmental Analysis Campus Expansion N Wichita StW Catalpa Ave W Dogwood Ave N Keystone StR1 R4 R2 R5 R3 3. Environmental Analysis Page 96  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 97 Table 13 shows the ground vibration levels at a reference distance of 25 feet due to the various construction equipment pieces anticipated to be used at the proposed project. As shown in the table, operation of the anticipated construction equipment would not generate groundborne vibration levels at 25 feet from the source that would exceed the FTA vibration-induced architectural threshold of 0.2 PPV. Given the relatively rapid decrease of groundborne vibration with increasing distance, receptors beyond this 25 foot reference distance would experience lower vibration levels than shown in the table. Since all these tabled values are well below the 0.2 PPV architectural damage threshold and since the closest receptor locations are beyond the 25 foot reference distance, vibration-induced architectural damage impacts would be less than significant. No mitigation measures are necessary. Table 13 Construction Equipment Ground Vibration Levels Equipment Vibration Level (PPV inch/sec)1 Large Construction2 0.089 Small Construction Equipment3 0.003 Loaded Trucks 0.076 Source: FTA 2006 1 As measured at a distance of 25 feet. 2 Equivalent to a large bulldozer. 3 Equivalent to a small bulldozer. Vibration Annoyance Vibration is typically noticed nearby when objects in a building generate noise from rattling windows or picture frames. It is typically not perceptible outdoors (FTA 2006) and, therefore, impacts are normally based on the distance to the nearest building. The FTA criterion for perceptible levels of vibration during the daytime is 78 VdB for residential uses. Since construction activities are typically distributed throughout the project site, vibration annoyance impacts are based on spatially-average vibration levels (levels that would be experienced by sensitive receptors the majority of the time) that exceed the FTA’s criteria for vibration-induced annoyance for residential land uses. Table 14 lists the average vibration levels for construction equipment anticipated to be used at the project site as measured from the general construction area to the nearest on-site and off-site vibration-sensitive structures. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 98  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 Table 14 Construction-Related Vibration Annoyance Vibration-Sensitive Use Distance to Construction Centroid (Feet)1 Predicted Average Vibration Level (VdB) Large Off-Road Construction Equipment2 Small Off-Road Construction Equipment3 Loaded Truck Baseball Field Portion Nearest on-site classroom building 190 69 40 68 Nearest residences (south) 240 67 38 66 Nearest residences (west) 285 66 37 65 Significance Threshold (VdB)78 78 78 Exceeds Significance Thresholds?No No No Aquatics Facility Portion Nearest on-site classroom building 90 76 47 75 Nearest residences (south) 225 68 39 67 Nearest residences (west) 145 72 43 71 Significance Threshold (VdB)78 78 78 Exceeds Significance Thresholds?No No No Source: FTA 2006. 1 Distance measured from center of general construction area to nearest structure. 2 Vibration levels from the listed off-road construction equipment are equivalent to vibration levels generated by a large bulldozer. 3 Vibration levels from the listed off-road construction equipment are equivalent to vibration levels generated by a small bulldozer. As shown in the table, project-related construction activities would not result in generating average vibration levels that would exceed FTA’s vibration annoyance threshold of 78 VdB at the nearest vibration-sensitive receptors. Although the maximum vibration levels11 associated with certain construction activities could be perceptible in certain instances, the effects would be limited because they would occur infrequently throughout the day. Also, they would occur in the daytime when people are least sensitive to vibration levels and would only occur for a very limited duration when equipment would be working in close proximity. Thus, project-related construction impacts related to vibration annoyance would be less than significant and no mitigation measures are necessary. Operation Project operations would not generate substantial levels of vibration since there are no significant vibration-generating sources as part of the proposed project. Therefore, this potential impact requires no further analysis. Impacts would be less than significant. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. Operational noise from the proposed improvements would be less than significant, as substantiated above in Section 3.12.a. Traffic Noise To increase traffic noise levels by more than 3 dBA, project-related traffic would have to double the existing roadway volumes (FTA 2006). 11 Maximum vibration is based on construction equipment operating directly adjacent to the property line. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 99 Aquatics Center The aquatics center would generate about 330 vehicle trips on a day of a capacity athletic event such as a water polo game or swim meet. The bleacher capacity at the existing swimming pool is about 150 seats, or about one-third the proposed aquatics center bleacher capacity. Thus, 220 trips generated by the aquatics center would be new trips on area roadways. Most trips to the aquatics center are expected to access the center from La Palma Avenue via Fairview Street, Dogwood Avenue, and Keystone Street, the most direct route to the center from an arterial roadway (see Figure 3, Aerial Photograph). One single-family detached residence is estimated to generate 9.57 trips per day (ITE 2012); thus, the residential neighborhood west of the school including Fairview Street, Dogwood Avenue, and Keystone Street is estimated to generate more than 220 trips per day on each of the roadways on the access route to the aquatics center site. Therefore, traffic noise impact generated by trips to and from the aquatics center are considered less than significant. Baseball Field The project would not increase numbers of people using the baseball field; the project would spread out use somewhat by extending use until 9:00 PM during the three-month baseball season and 7:00 PM during the remainder of the year. Thus, the project would not increase trip generation by use of the baseball field. Track and Football/Soccer Field The project would not increase numbers of people using the track and football/soccer field or times the field was used. Thus, the project would not increase trip generation by use of the track and football/soccer field. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Less Than Significant Impact. Construction noise would be less than significant, as substantiated above in Section 3.12.a. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Less Than Significant Impact. The project site is outside of the 60 CNEL (community noise equivalent level) contour for Fullerton Municipal Airport, which is 2.1 miles northwest of the site. The project would not expose students, staff, or visitors to excessive noise levels stemming from aircraft approaching or departing from Fullerton Municipal Airport, and impacts would be less than significant. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No Impact. There are no private airstrips or heliports near the project site, and no impact would occur. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 100  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? No Impact. The project site would not develop new homes or businesses. The project would not increase capacity or enrollment at Servite High School. The project would not extend roads or other infrastructure into areas currently lacking such improvements. The project would have no direct impact on population or housing growth. The project would displace four detached single-family residences. Project construction would generate some temporary employment. The unemployment rate in Orange County in April 2013 was 5.7 percent (EDD 2013). Thus, project employment is expected to be absorbed from the regional labor force and is not expected to attract new workers into the region. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would displace four detached single-family residences. Total vacant housing units in the City of Anaheim counted in the 2010 US Census were 5,943 units including 3,915 for-rent units and 819 for-sale units; vacancy rates were 5.7 percent for all units, 1.7 percent for homeowner units, and 7.2 percent for renter units. For ZIP Code 92801 the corresponding vacancy counts were 1,089 total, 820 for-rent, and 112 for-sale; and the corresponding rates were 5.9 percent, 1.7 percent, and 6.9 percent (USCB 2013).12 There are adequate vacant housing units in the City of Anaheim, and in ZIP Code 92801, to absorb households that would be displaced by the project. The four residential lots were acquired through voluntary purchase agreements with the homeowners; therefore, impacts would be less than significant. c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Less Than Significant Impact. The four houses that would be displaced are estimated to house 18 persons based on the average household size of 3.51 persons in ZIP Code 92801 counted in the 2010 US Census (USCB 2013). There are adequate vacant housing units in the City of Anaheim and in ZIP Code 92801 to absorb persons who would be displaced by the project, as substantiated above in Section 3.13.b. Impacts would be less than significant. 3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: 12 ZIP Code 92801 spans parts of western and north-central Anaheim; data for the ZIP Code are identified assuming that some residents may want replacement homes closer to their current homes than anywhere in the City of Anaheim. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 101 a) Fire protection? Less Than Significant Impact. Anaheim Fire & Rescue (AF&S) provides fire protection and emergency medical services to the project site. The nearest AF&S station to the project site is Station 2 at 2141 West Crescent Avenue, 0.4 mile southwest of the project site (AF&S 2013). The project would not increase enrollment at Servite High School. The project would increase numbers of spectators at athletic events due to improved athletic facilities including field lighting and lighting of the proposed aquatic center. However, such increase would be small and only occur during occasional brief events. Therefore, the project would not cause any substantial increase in demands for fire protection and/or emergency medical services, and impacts would be less than significant. The spectator events with the potential for large crowds – varsity football games – would continue to be held at Cerritos College and not on this campus. b) Police protection? Less Than Significant Impact. The Anaheim Police Department provides police protection to Anaheim. The project would not substantially increase demands for police protection, for the same reasons provided regarding fire protection in Section 3.14.a. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Schools? No Impact. The project would develop improved athletic facilities at a private boys’ high school. The project would not increase the number of students in the project region and would not require construction of new or expanded schools. No adverse impact would occur. d) Parks? No Impact. Demands for parks are generated by the population within the parks’ service areas. The project would not induce population growth and would not require construction of new or expanded parks. No impact would occur. e) Other public facilities No Impact. Demands for libraries are generated by the population within the libraries’ service areas. The project would not induce population growth and would not require construction of new or expanded libraries. No impact would occur. 3.15 RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities, such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? No Impact. The project would develop improved athletic facilities at a private boys’ high school. Demands for parks are generated by the population within the parks’ service areas. The project would not increase population, and thus would not increase use of park facilities or deterioration of such facilities. No impact would occur. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 102  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? No Impact. The project would not develop a park and would not require development of new or expanded parks, and no impact would occur. 3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Less Than Significant Impact. Existing Conditions Roadways La Palma Avenue next to the north side of Servite High School is four lanes with a striped median and with sidewalks on both sides of the street. The daily traffic count on La Palma Avenue at a location between Brookhurst Street and Euclid Street in 2007 was approximately 18,800 (City of Anaheim 2008). The other streets near the site are two-lane local streets in residential neighborhoods, described as follows:  Keystone Street is a north-south roadway along the west side of the aquatics center site.  Dogwood Avenue is an east-west roadway with two segments interrupted by the Servite campus.  Wichita Street is a north-south roadway along the east side of the Servite campus.  Catalpa Street is an east-west roadway just south of the south end of the school (see Figure 2, Local Vicinity Map). There are sidewalks on both sides of Keystone Street and Dogwood Avenue, and on the east side of Wichita Street. No existing bike routes are shown near the project site on the Orange County Bikeways Map (OCTA 2013a). Most of the local streets in the neighborhoods surrounding the school provide local circulation only and do not connect with La Palma Avenue or other arterial roadways. The nearest local residential streets to the school that intersect with La Palma Avenue are Fairview Street, one block west of Keystone Street, and Onondaga Avenue, two blocks east of Wichita Street. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 103 Intersections Traffic controls on roadways along existing and proposed access routes to school parking lots include cross-street stops at the four intersections listed below; while the intersection of Wichita Street and Dogwood Avenue is uncontrolled. Cross-street stop (stop signs are on roadway in boldface):  Fairview Street at La Palma Avenue  Onondaga Avenue at La Palma Avenue  Dogwood Avenue at Fairview Street  Dogwood Avenue at Onondaga Avenue Public Transit Service Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Route 38 operates on La Palma Avenue next to the school. Route 38 extends east-west from Anaheim Hills to the City of Lakewood in Los Angeles County seven days per week; peak-hour service frequency is about 13 minutes (OCTA 2013b). Project Trip Generation Aquatics Center The aquatics center would have 450 bleacher seats. Trip generation by an aquatics center event is estimated as 110 percent of the parking requirement for places of community and religious assembly in City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.42.020, which is 0.333 space per fixed seat.13 The aquatics center would have bleacher capacity of 450; thus, estimated trip generation is 165, with 150 vehicles parking at the facility and 15 vehicles dropping off passengers and leaving. The forecast trip volume would occur twice for each event; once just before and once just after the event. The project is not expected to cause increased use of athletic facilities on the campus. The project would not increase enrollment or staffing at the school, and so would not generate additional student or staff commute trips. Athletic events would occur in afternoon and evening hours on weekdays and on weekends. Baseball games at Servite are scheduled at 3:00 or 3:15 PM on weekdays and at various times on Saturdays. Football home games are played at Cerritos College and would continue to be played there after development of the proposed improvements. Project Traffic Impacts Trips generated by events at the new aquatics center and the improved athletic facilities would occur after most students leave campus at the end of the school day, or on weekends; thus, such trips would not add to traffic volumes on area roadways during student afternoon commute trips. Baseball games begin at 3:00 or 3:15 PM, before the afternoon commuter peak period. Impacts would be less than significant. 13 The trip generation estimate method used here was used for an environmental impact report for an aquatics center at Polytechnic High School in Riverside, California prepared by The Planning Center | DC&E in February 2011; Richard Garland, traffic engineer. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 104  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? No Impact. The congestion management plan (CMP) in effect in Orange County was issued by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) in November 2011. All freeways and tollways, and selected arterial roadways, are designated elements of the CMP Highway System. The nearest CMP arterial to the project site is Orangethorpe Avenue one mile north of the site; the nearest CMP monitoring intersection is Orangethorpe Avenue at Harbor Boulevard in the City of Fullerton about two miles northeast of the site; and the nearest freeway to the site is the I-5 0.2 mile to the southwest. Any increase in traffic generated by the project would be very small; would mostly be outside of weekday peak commute periods; and would come from many directions, so that a negligible fraction of project- generated traffic would pass through the intersection of Orangethorpe Avenue and Harbor Boulevard. The project would not increase traffic volumes on the I-5. Analysis of traffic impacts to CMP roadways is not required, and no impact would occur. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? No Impact. The project site is outside the area where heights of structures are regulated in relation to Fullerton Municipal Airport. The project would not require relocating air traffic routes to or from FMA. The project would not increase traffic volumes to or from FMA, and no impact would occur. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? No Impact. The intersection of Keystone Street and the driveway for the proposed staff parking lot next to Keystone Street would be perpendicular. Keystone Street is straight, so drivers on Keystone Street, and those exiting the parking lot, would have adequate visibility of potentially conflicting traffic. The project would not add incompatible uses to area roadways. No adverse impact would occur. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? No Impact. Project site and construction drawings would be submitted to Anaheim Fire & Rescue for review and approval regarding emergency access to buildings, turnaround radii for fire trucks, and emergency evacuation routes from buildings, before issuance of any building permits for the project by the City of Anaheim. The project would comply with any ensuing recommendations from Anaheim Fire & Rescue. The project would have no adverse impact on emergency access. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? No Impact. During project construction trucks and construction equipment would cross the sidewalk next to the east side of Keystone Street in front of the aquatics center site. The project would prepare and implement a construction traffic control plan including provisions for providing safe pedestrian access on the sidewalk along the construction zone. The project would not interfere with OCTA Route 38 bus service on La Palma Avenue. The project would not interfere with bicycle facilities. No adverse impact would occur. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 105 g) Result in inadequate parking capacity? Less Than Significant Impact. The IBI Group prepared a Parking Study, November 2012, which is attached as Appendix E. The school provides 319 off-street parking spaces. Use of school parking lots was surveyed by IBI on October 18, 2012 from 6 AM to 6 PM. Peak parking demand, 317 parking spaces or 99 percent of spaces available, occurred at 12:00 PM. The IBI study concluded that the project would not generate additional parking demand above the existing parking supply. To confirm IBI’s findings, The Planning Center conducted a parking survey on August 21, 2013 at 11:30 AM, when according to the parking study the demand is at peak, and at 4 PM when typical events at the aquatics center would occur. The results of that survey are show in Table 15 and show somewhat higher numbers at noon and lower numbers at 4:00 PM While the school currently experiences a parking shortage of 12 spaces during normal school hours and there is evidence of spillover of cars parked in the adjoining neighborhood, the project would add one 25-space parking lot next to the south end of the aquatics center, thereby increasing total school parking capacity from 319 to 344. Table 15 Parking Survey (August 2013) Parking Area Parking Spaces 11:30 AM 4:00 pm Student 244 261 156 Staff 75 68 36 Total 319 329 192 % Occupied 103% 60% Aquatics Center The proposed aquatics center would provide 450 bleacher seats; the existing pool provides about 150 bleacher seats, for a net increase of 300 seats. The City of Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.42.020 requires 0.333 parking space for every fixed seat in a place of community or religious assembly. Thus, 100 parking spaces would be required. Intermural swimming competitions and water polo games would occur outside of normal school hours in afternoons and on weekends; thus, the project would not add to parking demands at the school. Baseball Field and Football/Soccer Field Athletic events would occur in afternoon and evening hours on weekdays and on weekends. Baseball games at Servite High School are currently scheduled at 3:00 or 3:15 PM on weekdays and at various times on Saturdays. With the addition of the lights at the baseball field, evening baseball games and practices could be accommodated. Spectator events at the proposed aquatics center and baseball field would occur outside of normal school hours when parking spaces are available. With the addition of lights at the baseball field, and per the Event Management Plan, games would be scheduled to conclude by 9:00 PM. Baseball games are not large spectator events and would not impact parking during this period. The largest events at the aquatics center could reach 450 spectators. An event beginning around 4:00 PM would have 152 parking spaces available for spectators. Although many of these spectators would be students already on campus, even if it is assumed that all 450 spectators arrive at the campus for the 3. Environmental Analysis Page 106  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 event, sufficient parking would be available. With the additional 25 spaces added as part of the project, there would be 344 off-street parking spaces available. Should 192 spaces be occupied at 4 PM, there would be 152 remaining available spaces. At a ratio of one car per three spectators, such events would create a demand for 150 spaces. The available parking would not be exceeded and the impact would be less than significant. Football home games are played at Cerritos College and would continue to be played there after development of the proposed improvements. The new lights at the football field are not expected to impact parking at the school. 3.17 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS a) Exceed waste water treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Less Than Significant Impact. Waste discharge requirements issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, and project impacts on such requirements, are discussed above in Section 3.9.a. Impacts would be less than significant. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or waste water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Less Than Significant Impact. Water is provided to the school by City of Anaheim Water Services; wastewater treatment is provided for the school by the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD). The project would not increase enrollment or staffing at Servite High School. Any increased numbers of visitors to the campus for athletic events would be occasional and brief, and thus would not substantially increase water demand or wastewater generation at the school. Impacts would be less than significant. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? No Impact. The project would not require construction of new or expanded storm drainage facilities, as substantiated above in Sections 3.9.c and 3.9.d. No impact would occur. d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not substantially increase water demand at Servite High School, and the project would not require City of Anaheim Water Services to obtain new or expanded water supplies. Impacts would be less than significant. e) Result in a determination by the waste water treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Less Than Significant Impact. The project would not substantially increase wastewater generation at Servite High School, and the project would not require expanded wastewater treatment capacity. Impacts would be less than significant. 3. Environmental Analysis Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 107 f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? Less Than Significant Impact. The three landfills serving Orange County are operated by OC Waste & Recycling, a County agency. The nearest of the three landfills to the project site is the Olinda-Alpha Landfill near the City of Brea. The project would not substantially increase solid waste generation at Servite High School, and the project would not require expanded landfill capacity. Impacts would be less than significant. g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? No Impact. The project would have no adverse impact on requirements that local jurisdictions divert 50 percent of their solid waste from landfills set forth in AB 939, the Integrated Solid Waste Management Act of 1989. 3.18 MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No Impact. The existing campus and expansion area are part of a previously developed community and no natural habitats remain in on-site. Also, the residences to be demolished as part of the project are not historically significant. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects.) Less Than Significant Impact. The proposed project is located in a stable, mature neighborhood and other projects in the neighborhood that could add to cumulative impacts are not anticipated. The analysis of the proposed project was conducted within the context of past projects at the campus and these impacts were found to be less than significant. c) Does the project have environmental effects, which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? Less Than Significant with Mitigation Incorporated. The analysis contained in this Initial Study determined that spillover lighting has the potential to adversely impact the residences living adjacent to the campus. However, mitigation measures have been identified that, if implemented, would reduce such impacts to a less than significant level. 3. Environmental Analysis Page 108  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 109 4. References Airnav.com. 2013, June 5. Airport Information. http://www.airnav.com/airports/. Anaheim, City of. 2012, May 17. Zoning. http://www.anaheim.net/departmentfolders/planning/ZoningMap.pdf. Anaheim, City of. 2013, February 25. General Plan Land Use Plan. http://www.anaheim.net/generalplan/docs/GP_Land_Use_Plan_Map.pdf. Anaheim, City of. 2008, April 28. Average Daily Traffic Volume Table. http://www.anaheim.net/images/articles/1713/ADT%20Table.pdf. Anaheim City School District (ACSD). 2013, June 6. John Marshall Elementary School. http://marshall.acsd.us/. Anaheim Fire & Rescue (AF&S). 2013, June 5. Station Locations Google Map. http://www.anaheim.net/title/Fire+Department/default/Station+Locations+Google+Map/page.ht m. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2011. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2012, April. California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000-2009 – by Category as Defined by the Scoping Plan. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/inventory.htm _______.2013, July. Ambient Air Quality Standards. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf. ———.2013, June 23. Area Designations: Activities and Maps. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm ———. 2008, October. Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan, a Framework for Change. California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2013, June 4. Natural Community Conservation Planning: Plan Summaries. http://www.dfg.ca.gov/habcon/nccp/status/index.html. California Department of Forestry and Fire Prevention (CAL FIRE). 2011, November. Very High Fire Hazard Severity Zones in LRA. ftp://frap.cdf.ca.gov/fhszlocalmaps/orange/final/c30_Anaheim_vhfhsz.pdf. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2011, September 7. California Scenic Highway Mapping System. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic_highways/. ______.1997, December. Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol. UCD-ITS-RR-97-21. Prepared by Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis. 4. References Page 110  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 California Geological Survey. 2013, May 29. 2010 Fault Activity Map of California. http://www.quake.ca.gov/gmaps/FAM/faultactivitymap.html#. ———. 1998, April 15. Seismic Hazard Zones map, Anaheim Quadrangle. http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/quad/ANAHEIM/maps/ozn_anah.pdf. ———. 1997. Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5-Minute Quadrangles, Orange County, California. http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/quad/ANAHEIM/reports/anah_eval.pdf. ———. 1991, November 1. Special Studies Zones map, La Habra quadrangle. http://gmw.consrv.ca.gov/shmp/download/quad/LA_HABRA/maps/LAHABRA.PDF. Cleartech. 2010, November 8. Material Safety Data Sheet: Chlorine. http://www.cleartech.ca/msds/chlorine.pdf. Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC). 2013, June 5. EnviroStor. http://www.envirostor.dtsc.ca.gov/public/. Division of Land Resource Protection (DLRP). 2013, June 4. California Important Farmland Finder. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/ciff.html. Employment Development Department (EDD). 2013, June 5. Report 400C: Monthly Labor Force Data for Counties. May 2012 – Preliminary. http://www.calmis.ca.gov/file/lfmonth/1205pcou.pdf. Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). 2009, December 3. Flood Zone Map 06059C0127J. http://map1.msc.fema.gov/idms/IntraView.cgi?KEY=43614501&IFIT=1. Fitzgerald, Cathy (Senior Engineer). 2013, June 6. Email. The Planning Center | DC&E. GLB. 2001, April 19. Material Safety Data Sheet, GLB Large 3" Tablets (Stabilized Chlorinating Concentrate). http://www.horizonpoolsupply.com/_uls/resources/GLB_Large3Tablets.pdf. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC). 2001. 2001 IPCC Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001. National Park Service (NPS). 2013, June 4. National Register of Historic Places. http://nrhp.focus.nps.gov/natreghome.do?searchtype=natreghome. Nationwide Environmental Title Research, LLC (NETR). 2013, June 4. Historic aerial photographs. Historicaerials.com. Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). 2013, June 4. California Historical Resources. http://ohp.parks.ca.gov/listedresources/. Office of Mine Reclamation (OMR). 2013, June 5. Mines Online. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/mol/mol-app.html. 4. References Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 111 Orange County Flood Control District (OCFlood). 2010, December 20. Base Map of Flood Control Facilities in Orange County, Sheet No. 13. http://ocflood.com/civicax/filebank/blobdload.aspx?BlobID=23099. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). 2013a, June 6. Orange County Bikeways Map. http://www.octa.net/Share-the-Ride/Bike/Riding-in-Orange-County/OC-Bikeways-Map/. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). 2013b, February 10. Route 38. http://www.octa.net/ebusbook/feb2013RoutePDF/route038.pdf. Orange County Water District (OCWD). 2009, July 9. Ground Water Management Plan 2009 Update. http://www.ocwd.com/Portals/0/News/PublicationsReports/GWMPJuly2009Update.pdf. P & D Aviation. 2004, May. Fullerton Municipal Airport Master Plan. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2011. California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2011.1.1. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) 2010, September 28. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting 15. http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/GHG/2010/sept28mtg/sept29.html ———. 2010, September 28. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting 15. http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/GHG/2010/sept28mtg/sept29.html ———. 2008, September. Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin (MATES III). ———. 2005, May. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2012, April. 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Pages/default.aspx State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB). GeoTracker. http://geotracker.waterboards.ca.gov/. US Census Bureau (USCB). 2013, June 5. American Factfinder. http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/index.xhtml###. US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2013, June 5. EnviroMapper for EnviroFacts. http://www.epa.gov/emefdata/em4ef.home. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013b, June 4. Habitat Conservation Plans. http://ecos.fws.gov/conserv_plans/servlet/gov.doi.hcp.servlets.PlanReport. US Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). 2013a, June 4. National Wetlands Mapper. http://107.20.228.18/Wetlands/WetlandsMapper.html#. US Geological Survey (USGS). 2013, June 5. Mineral Resources Data System. http://mrdata.usgs.gov/mineral-resources/mrds-us.html. 4. References Page 112  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 US Geological Survey (USGS). 2012, July 24. The Modified Mercalli Intensity Scale. http://earthquake.usgs.gov/learn/topics/mercalli.php. Wald, David J., et al. 1999, August. Relationships Between Peak Ground Acceleration, Peak Ground Velocity, and Modified Mercalli Intensity in California. Earthquake Spectra 15 No. 3. Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC). 2012. Western U.S. Historical Summaries – Fullerton Hillcrest Monitoring Station (Station ID No. 047888). Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim  Page 113 5. List of Preparers 5.1 CITY OF ANAHEIM David See, Senior Planner. 5.2 THE PLANNING CENTER|DC&E Dwayne Mears, Principal, Michael Milroy, Associate Planner Annie Lassaline, Assistant Planner Bob Mantey, Manager, Noise, Acoustics, and Vibration Nicole Vermilion, Manager, Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analyses Fernando Sotelo, Associate Scientist Cary Nakama, Graphic Artist 5. List of Preparers Page 114  The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim Appendix A. Events Management Plan Appendix The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Appendix Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim Appendix B Photometric Analysis Appendix The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. A B C D E F G H 1 2 3 4 Light Measurement Locations Locations on and near site of proposed aquatics center. Locations opposite Wichita Avenue from track and football/soccer field; field lights on. Appendix Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim Appendix C Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Analysis Appendix The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 1 Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data AIR QUALITY CLIMATE/METEOROLOGY South Coast Air Basin The project site lies within the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB), which includes all of Orange County and the nondesert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. The SoCAB is in a coastal plain with connecting broad valleys and low hills and is bounded by the Pacific Ocean in the southwest quadrant, with high mountains forming the remainder of the perimeter. The general region lies in the semi-permanent high-pressure zone of the eastern Pacific. As a result, the climate is mild, tempered by cool sea breezes. This usually mild weather pattern is interrupted infrequently by periods of extremely hot weather, winter storms, and Santa Ana winds (SCAQMD 2005). Temperature and Precipitation The annual average temperature varies little throughout the SoCAB, ranging from the low to middle 60s, measured in degrees Fahrenheit (°F). With a more pronounced oceanic influence, coastal areas show less variability in annual minimum and maximum temperatures than inland areas. The climatological station nearest to the project site is the Fullerton Hillcrest Monitoring Station (ID No.047888). The lowest average low is reported at 43.1°F in January while the highest average high is 84.7°F in August (WRCC 2012). In contrast to a very steady pattern of temperature, rainfall is seasonally and annually highly variable. Almost all rain falls from November through April. Summer rainfall is normally restricted to widely scattered thundershowers near the coast, with slightly heavier shower activity in the east and over the mountains. Rainfall averages 13.69 inches per year in the project area (WRCC 2012). Humidity Although the SoCAB has a semiarid climate, the air near the earth’s surface is typically moist because of the presence of a shallow marine layer. Except for infrequent periods when dry, continental air is brought into the SoCAB by offshore winds, the “ocean effect” is dominant. Periods of heavy fog, especially along the coast, are frequent. Low clouds, often referred to as high fog, are a characteristic climatic feature. Annual average humidity is 70 percent at the coast and 57 percent in the eastern portions of the SoCAB (SCAQMD 2005). Wind Wind patterns across the south coastal region are characterized by westerly or southwesterly onshore winds during the day and by easterly or northeasterly breezes at night. Wind speed is somewhat greater during the dry summer months than during the rainy winter season. Between periods of wind, periods of air stagnation may occur, both in the morning and evening hours. Air stagnation is one of the critical determinants of air quality conditions on any given day. During the winter and fall months, surface high-pressure systems over the SoCAB, combined with other Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 2 meteorological conditions, can result in very strong, downslope Santa Ana winds. These winds normally continue a few days before predominant meteorological conditions are reestablished. The mountain ranges to the east affect the transport and diffusion of pollutants by inhibiting their eastward transport. Air quality in the SoCAB generally ranges from fair to poor and is similar to air quality in most of coastal southern California. The entire region experiences heavy concentrations of air pollutants during prolonged periods of stable atmospheric conditions (SCAQMD 2005). Inversions In conjunction with the two characteristic wind patterns that affect the rate and orientation of horizontal pollutant transport, there are two similarly distinct types of temperature inversions that control the vertical depth through which pollutants are mixed. These are the marine/subsidence inversion and the radiation inversion. The combination of winds and inversions are critical determinants in leading to the highly degraded air quality in summer and the generally good air quality in the winter in the project area (SCAQMD 2005). AIR QUALITY REGULATIONS, PLANS AND POLICIES The proposed project has the potential to release gaseous emissions of criteria pollutants and dust into the ambient air; therefore, it falls under the ambient air quality standards promulgated at the local, state, and federal levels. The project site is in the SoCAB and is subject to the rules and regulations imposed by the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). However, SCAQMD reports to California Air Resources board (CARB), and all criteria emissions are also governed by the California and national Ambient Air Quality Standards (AAQS). Federal, state, regional, and local laws, regulations, plans, or guidelines that are potentially applicable to the proposed project are summarized below. Ambient Air Quality Standards The Clean Air Act (CAA) was passed in 1963 by the US Congress and has been amended several times. The 1970 Clean Air Act amendments strengthened previous legislation and laid the foundation for the regulatory scheme of the 1970s and 1980s. In 1977, Congress again added several provisions, including nonattainment requirements for areas not meeting National AAQS and the Prevention of Significant Deterioration program. The 1990 amendments represent the latest in a series of federal efforts to regulate the protection of air quality in the United States. The CAA allows states to adopt more stringent standards or to include other pollution species. The California Clean Air Act (CCAA), signed into law in 1988, requires all areas of the state to achieve and maintain the California AAQS by the earliest practical date. The California AAQS tend to be more restrictive than the National AAQS, based on even greater health and welfare concerns. These National AAQS and California AAQS are the levels of air quality considered to provide a margin of safety in the protection of the public health and welfare. They are designed to protect “sensitive receptors” most susceptible to further respiratory distress, such as asthmatics, the elderly, very young children, people already weakened by other disease or illness, and persons engaged in strenuous work or exercise. Healthy adults can tolerate occasional exposure to air pollutant concentrations considerably above these minimum standards before adverse effects are observed. Both California and the federal government have established health-based AAQS for seven air pollutants. As shown in Table 1, these pollutants include ozone (O3), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb). In addition, the state has set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, vinyl Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 3 chloride, and visibility-reducing particles. These standards are designed to protect the health and welfare of the populace with a reasonable margin of safety. Table 1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants Pollutant Averaging Time California Standard Federal Primary Standard Major Pollutant Sources Ozone (O3) 1 hour 0.09 ppm * Motor vehicles, paints, coatings, and solvents. 8 hours 0.070 ppm 0.075 ppm Carbon Monoxide (CO) 1 hour 20 ppm 35 ppm Internal combustion engines, primarily gasoline-powered motor vehicles. 8 hours 9.0 ppm 9 ppm Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2) Annual Average 0.030 ppm 0.053 ppm Motor vehicles, petroleum-refining operations, industrial sources, aircraft, ships, and railroads. 1 hour 0.18 ppm 0.100 ppm Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) Annual Arithmetic Mean * 0.030 ppm2 Fuel combustion, chemical plants, sulfur recovery plants, and metal processing. 1 hour 0.25 ppm 0.075 ppm1 24 hours 0.04 ppm 0.014 ppm2 Respirable Coarse Particulate Matter (PM10) Annual Arithmetic Mean 20 µg/m3 * Dust and fume-producing construction, industrial, and agricultural operations, combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (e.g., wind- raised dust and ocean sprays). 24 hours 50 µg/m3 150 µg/m3 Respirable Fine Particulate Matter (PM2.5 ) Annual Arithmetic Mean 12 µg/m3 12 µg/m3 Dust and fume-producing construction, industrial, and agricultural operations, combustion, atmospheric photochemical reactions, and natural activities (e.g., wind- raised dust and ocean sprays). 24 hours * 35 µg/m3 Lead (Pb) Monthly 1.5 µg/m3 * Present source: lead smelters, battery manufacturing & recycling facilities. Past source: combustion of leaded gasoline. Quarterly * 1.5 µg/m3 3-Month Average * 0.15 µg/m3 Sulfates (SO4) 24 hours 25 µg/m3 * Industrial processes. Visibility Reducing Particles 8 hours ExCo =0.23/km visibility of 10≥ miles1 No Federal Standard Visibility-reducing particles consist of suspended particulate matter, which is a complex mixture of tiny particles that consists of dry solid fragments, solid cores with liquid coatings, and small droplets of liquid. These particles vary greatly in shape, size and chemical composition, and can be made up of many different materials such as metals, soot, soil, dust, and salt. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 4 Table 1 Ambient Air Quality Standards for Criteria Pollutants Pollutant Averaging Time California Standard Federal Primary Standard Major Pollutant Sources Hydrogen Sulfide 1 hour 0.03 ppm No Federal Standard Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) is a colorless gas with the odor of rotten eggs. It is formed during bacterial decomposition of sulfur- containing organic substances. Also, it can be present in sewer gas and some natural gas, and can be emitted as the result of geothermal energy exploitation. Vinyl Chloride 24 hour 0.01 ppm No Federal Standard Vinyl chloride (chloroethene), a chlorinated hydrocarbon, is a colorless gas with a mild, sweet odor. Most vinyl chloride is used to make polyvinyl chloride (PVC) plastic and vinyl products. Vinyl chloride has been detected near landfills, sewage plants, and hazardous waste sites, due to microbial breakdown of chlorinated solvents. Source: CARB 2013 ppm: parts per million; µg/m3: micrograms per cubic meter 1 When relative humidity is less than 70 percent. 2 On June 2, 2010, a new 1-hour SO2 standard was established and the existing 24-hour and annual primary standards were revoked. The 1971 SO2 national standards (24-hour and annual) remain in effect until one year after an area is designated for the 2010 standard, except that in areas designated nonattainment for the 1971 standards, the 1971 standards remain in effect until implementation plans to attain or maintain the 2010 standards are approved. * Standard has not been established for this pollutant/duration by this entity. Criteria Air Pollutants The air pollutants emitted into the ambient air by stationary and mobile sources are regulated by federal and state law. Air pollutants are categorized as primary or secondary pollutants. Primary air pollutants are those that are emitted directly from sources. Carbon monoxide (CO), volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), coarse inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine inhalable particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead (Pb) are primary air pollutants. Of these, CO, SO2, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5 are “criteria air pollutants,” which means that ambient air quality standards (AAQS) have been established for them. VOC and oxides of nitrogen (NOx) are air pollutant precursors that form secondary criteria pollutants through chemical and photochemical reactions in the atmosphere. Ozone (O3) and NO2 are the principal secondary pollutants. A description of each of the primary and secondary criteria air pollutants and their known health effects is presented below. Carbon Monoxide (CO) is a colorless, odorless, toxic gas produced by incomplete combustion of carbon substances, such as gasoline or diesel fuel. CO is a primary criteria air pollutant. CO concentrations tend to be the highest during winter mornings with little to no wind, when surface-based inversions trap the pollutant at ground levels. Because CO is emitted directly from internal combustion, engines and motor vehicles operating at slow speeds are the primary source of CO in the SoCAB. The highest ambient CO concentrations are generally found near traffic-congested corridors and intersections. The primary adverse health effect associated with CO is interference with normal oxygen transfer to the blood, which may result in tissue oxygen deprivation (SCAQMD 2005). The SoCAB is designated under the California and National AAQS as being in attainment of CO criteria levels (CARB 2013). Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 5 Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC) are compounds composed primarily of atoms of hydrogen and carbon. Internal combustion associated with motor vehicle usage is the major source of hydrocarbons. Other sources of VOCs include evaporative emissions associated with the use of paints and solvents, the application of asphalt paving, and the use of household consumer products such as aerosols. There are no ambient air quality standards established for VOCs. However, because they contribute to the formation of ozone (O3), SCAQMD has established a significance threshold for this pollutant (SCAQMD 2005). Nitrogen Oxides (NOx) are a byproduct of fuel combustion and contribute to the formation of O3, PM10, and PM2.5. The two major forms of NOx are nitric oxide (NO) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2). The principal form of NO2 produced by combustion is NO, but NO reacts with oxygen to form NO2, creating the mixture of NO and NO2 commonly called NOx. NO2 acts as an acute irritant and, in equal concentrations, is more injurious than NO. At atmospheric concentrations, however, NO2 is only potentially irritating. There is some indication of a relationship between NO2 and chronic pulmonary fibrosis. Some increase in bronchitis in children (two and three years old) has also been observed at concentrations below 0.3 part per million (ppm). NO2 absorbs blue light; the result is a brownish-red cast to the atmosphere and reduced visibility. NO is a colorless, odorless gas formed from atmospheric nitrogen and oxygen when combustion takes place under high temperature and/or high pressure (SCAQMD 2005). The SoCAB is designated as an attainment area for NO2 under the National AAQS and nonattainment under the California AAQS (CARB 2013). Sulfur Dioxide (SO2) is a colorless, pungent, irritating gas formed by the combustion of sulfurous fossil fuels. It enters the atmosphere as a result of burning high-sulfur-content fuel oils and coal and from chemical processes at chemical plants and refineries. Gasoline and natural gas have very low sulfur content and do not release significant quantities of SO2 (SCAQMD 2005). When sulfur dioxide forms sulfates (SO4) in the atmosphere, together these pollutants are referred to as sulfur oxides (SOx). Thus, SO2 is both a primary and secondary criteria air pollutant. At sufficiently high concentrations, SO2 may irritate the upper respiratory tract. At lower concentrations and when combined with particulates, SO2 may do greater harm by injuring lung tissue. The SoCAB is designated as attainment under the California and National AAQS (CARB 2013). Suspended Particulate Matter (PM10 and PM2.5) consists of finely divided solids or liquids such as soot, dust, aerosols, fumes, and mists. Two forms of fine particulates are now recognized and regulated. Inhalable coarse particles, or PM10, include the particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter of 10 microns (i.e., 10 millionths of a meter or 0.0004 inch) or less. Inhalable fine particles, or PM2.5, have an aerodynamic diameter of 2.5 microns (i.e., 2.5 millionths of a meter or 0.0001 inch) or less. Particulate discharge into the atmosphere results primarily from industrial, agricultural, construction, and transportation activities. However, wind action on arid landscapes also contributes substantially to local particulate loading (i.e., fugitive dust). Both PM10 and PM2.5 may adversely affect the human respiratory system, especially in people who are naturally sensitive or susceptible to breathing problems (SCAQMD 2005). The US Environmental Protection Agency’s (EPA) scientific review concluded that PM2.5, which penetrates deeply into the lungs, is more likely than PM10 to contribute to health effects and at concentrations that extend well below those allowed by the current PM10 standards. These health effects include premature death and increased hospital admissions and emergency room visits (primarily the elderly and individuals with cardiopulmonary disease); increased respiratory symptoms and disease (children and individuals with cardiopulmonary disease such as asthma); decreased lung functions (particularly in children and individuals with asthma); and alterations in lung tissue and structure and in respiratory tract defense mechanisms. Diesel particulate matter (DPM) is classified by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) as a carcinogen. The SoCAB is a nonattainment area for PM2.5 and PM10 under California and National AAQS (CARB 2013). Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 6 Ozone (O3) is commonly referred to as “smog” and is a gas that is formed when VOCs and NOx, both by-products of internal combustion engine exhaust, undergo photochemical reactions in the presence of sunlight. O3 is a secondary criteria air pollutant. O3 concentrations are generally highest during the summer months when direct sunlight, light winds, and warm temperatures create favorable conditions for the formation of this pollutant. O3 poses a health threat to those who already suffer from respiratory diseases as well as to healthy people. Additionally, O3 has been tied to crop damage, typically in the form of stunted growth and premature death. O3 can also act as a corrosive, resulting in property damage such as the degradation of rubber products (SCAQMD 2005). The SoCAB is designated as extreme nonattainment under the California AAQS (1-hour and 8-hour) and National AAQS (8-hour) (CARB 2011).1 Lead (Pb) concentrations decades ago exceeded the state and federal AAQS by a wide margin, but have not exceeded state or federal air quality standards at any regular monitoring station since 1982 (SCAQMD 2005). However, in 2008 the EPA and CARB adopted more strict lead standards, and special monitoring sites immediately downwind of lead sources 2 recorded very localized violations of the new state and federal standards. As a result of these localized violations, the Los Angeles County portion of the SoCAB was designated in 2010 as nonattainment under the California and National AAQS for lead (CARB 2011). The project is not characteristic of industrial-type projects that have the potential to emit lead. Therefore, lead is not a pollutant of concern for the project. Air Quality Management Planning SCAQMD is the agency responsible for preparing the air quality management plan (AQMP) for the SoCAB in coordination with the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Since 1979, a number of AQMPs have been prepared. 2012 AQMP On December 7, 2012 SCAQMD adopted the 2012 AQMP (Plan), which employs the most up-to-date science and analytical tools and incorporates a comprehensive strategy aimed at controlling pollution from all sources, including stationary sources, on-road and off-road mobile sources, and area sources. The Plan also addresses several state and federal planning requirements, incorporating new scientific information, primarily in the form of updated emissions inventories, ambient measurements, and new meteorological air quality models. The Plan builds upon the approach identified in the 2007 AQMP for attainment of federal PM and ozone standards, and highlights the significant amount of reductions needed and the urgent need to engage in interagency coordinated planning to identify additional strategies, especially in the area of mobile sources, to meet all federal criteria air pollutant standards within the timeframes allowed under the Federal CAA. The Plan demonstrates attainment of federal 24- hour PM2.5 standard by 2014 and the federal 8-hour ozone standard by 2023. The Plan includes an update to the revised EPA 8-hour ozone control plan with new commitments for short-term NOX and VOC reductions. In addition, it also identifies emerging issues of ultrafine (PM1.0) particulate matter and near- roadway exposure, and an analysis of energy supply and demand. 1 CARB approved the SCAQMD’s request to redesignate the SoCAB from serious nonattainment for PM10 to attainment for PM10 under the National AAQS on March 25, 2010, because the SoCAB has not violated federal 24-hour PM10 standards during the period from 2004 to 2007. However, the EPA has not yet approved this request. 2 Source-oriented monitors record concentrations of lead at lead-related industrial facilities in the SoCAB, which include Exide Technologies in the City of Commerce; Quemetco, Inc., in the City of Industry; Trojan Battery Company in Santa Fe Springs; and Exide Technologies in Vernon. Monitoring conducted between 2004 through 2007 identified that the Trojan Battery Company and Exide Technologies exceed the federal standards (SCAQMD 2010). Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 7 Lead State Implementation Plan In 2008 EPA designated the Los Angeles County portion of the SoCAB nonattainment under the federal lead (Pb) classification due to the addition of source-specific monitoring under the new federal regulation. This designation was based on two source-specific monitors in Vernon and the City of Industry exceeding the new standard. The rest of the SoCAB, outside the Los Angeles County nonattainment area remains in attainment of the new standard. On May 24, 2012, CARB approved the SIP revision for the federal lead standard, which the EPA revised in 2008. Lead concentrations in this nonattainment area have been below the level of the federal standard since December 2011. The SIP revision was submitted to EPA for approval. Area Designations The AQMP provides the framework for air quality basins to achieve attainment of the state and federal ambient air quality standards through the State Implementation Plan (SIP). Areas are classified as attainment or nonattainment areas for particular pollutants, depending on whether they meet ambient air quality standards. Severity classifications for ozone nonattainment range in magnitude from marginal, moderate, and serious to severe and extreme. • Unclassified: a pollutant is designated unclassified if the data are incomplete and do not support a designation of attainment or nonattainment. • Attainment: a pollutant is in attainment if the CAAQS for that pollutant was not violated at any site in the area during a three-year period. • Nonattainment: a pollutant is in nonattainment if there was at least one violation of a state AAQS for that pollutant in the area. • Nonattainment/Transitional: a subcategory of the nonattainment designation. An area is designated nonattainment/transitional to signify that the area is close to attaining the AAQS for that pollutant. The attainment status for the SoCAB is shown in Table 2. The SoCAB is also designated in attainment of the California AAQS for sulfates. According to the 2007 AQMP, the SoCAB will have to meet the new federal 8-hour O3 standard by 2024, PM2.5 standards by 2015, and the recently revised 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 2020. SCAQMD has recently designated the SoCAB as nonattainment for NO2 (entire basin) and lead (Los Angeles County only) under the California AAQS. Transportation conformity for nonattainment and maintenance areas is required under the Federal CAA to ensure federally supported highway and transit projects conform to the SIP. The U.S. EPA approved California’s SIP revisions for attainment of the 1997 8-hour O3 National AAQS for the SoCAB in March 2012. Findings for the new 8- hour O3 emissions budgets for the SoCAB and consistency with the recently adopted 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) were submitted to the U.S. EPA for approval. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 8 Table 2 Attainment Status of Criteria Pollutants in the South Coast Air Basin Pollutant State Federal Ozone – 1-hour Extreme Nonattainment No Federal Standard Ozone – 8-hour Extreme Nonattainment Severe-17 Nonattainment1 PM10 Serious Nonattainment Nonattainment2 PM2.5 Nonattainment Nonattainment CO Attainment Attainment NO2 Nonattainment Attainment/Maintenance SO2 Attainment Attainment Lead Nonattainment (Los Angeles County only)3 Nonattainment (Los Angeles County only )3 All others Attainment/Unclassified Attainment/Unclassified Source: CARB 2013. 1 SCAQMD may petition for Extreme Nonattainment designation. 2 Annual standard revoked September 2006. CARB approved SCAQMD’s request to redesignate the SoCAB from serious nonattainment for PM10 to attainment for PM10 under the National AAQS on March 25, 2010, because the SoCAB has not violated federal 24-hour PM10 standards from 2004 to 2007. However, the EPA has not yet approved this request. 3 The Los Angeles portion of the SoCAB was designated nonattainment for lead under the new federal and existing state AAQS as a result of large industrial emitters. Remaining areas within the SoCAB are unclassified. 4 On May 24, 2012, CARB approved the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the federal lead (Pb) standard, which EPA revised in 2008. The SIP revision addresses attainment of the federal lead standard in the SoCAB portion of Los Angeles County, the only area in California designated as nonattainment for lead. Lead concentrations in this nonattainment area have been below the level of the federal standard since December 2011. The SIP revision was submitted to EPA for approval. Toxic Air Contaminants The public’s exposure to air pollutants classified as toxic air contaminants (TACs) is a significant environmental health issue in California. In 1983, the California Legislature enacted a program to identify the health effects of TACs and to reduce exposure to these contaminants to protect the public health. The California Health and Safety Code defines a TAC as “an air pollutant which may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or in serious illness, or which may pose a present or potential hazard to human health.” A substance that is listed as a hazardous air pollutant (HAP) pursuant to Section 112(b) of the federal Clean Air Act (42 United States Code §7412[b]) is a toxic air contaminant. Under state law, the California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA), acting through CARB, is authorized to identify a substance as a TAC if it determines that the substance is an air pollutant that may cause or contribute to an increase in mortality or to an increase in serious illness, or may pose a present or potential hazard to human health. California regulates TACs primarily through Assembly Bill (AB) 1807 (Tanner Air Toxics Act) and AB 2588 (Air Toxics “Hot Spot” Information and Assessment Act of 1987). The Tanner Air Toxics Act sets forth a formal procedure for CARB to designate substances as TACs. Once a TAC is identified, CARB adopts an “airborne toxics control measure” for sources that emit designated TACs. If there is a safe threshold for a substance (i.e., a point below which there is no toxic effect), the control measure must reduce exposure to below that threshold. If there is no safe threshold, the measure must incorporate toxics best available control technology to minimize emissions. To date, CARB has established formal control measures for 11 TACs, all of which are identified as having no safe threshold. Air toxics from stationary sources are also regulated in California under the Air Toxics “Hot Spot” Information and Assessment Act of 1987. Under AB 2588, toxic air contaminant emissions from individual facilities are quantified and prioritized by the air quality management district or air pollution control district. High priority facilities are required to perform a health risk assessment and, if specific thresholds Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 9 are exceeded, are required to communicate the results to the public in the form of notices and public meetings. By the last update to the TAC list in December 1999, CARB had designated 244 compounds as TACs (CARB 1999). Additionally, CARB has implemented control measures for a number of compounds that pose high risks and show potential for effective control. The majority of the estimated health risks from TACs can be attributed to relatively few compounds, the most important being particulate matter from diesel-fueled engines. In 1998, CARB identified particulate emissions from diesel-fueled engines (diesel PM) as a TAC. Previously, the individual chemical compounds in diesel exhaust were considered TACs. Almost all diesel exhaust particle mass is 10 microns or less in diameter. Because of their extremely small size, these particles can be inhaled and eventually trapped in the bronchial and alveolar regions of the lung. In 2000, SCAQMD conducted a study on ambient concentrations of TACs and estimated the potential health risks from air toxics. The results showed that the overall risk for excess cancer from a lifetime exposure to ambient levels of air toxics was about 1,400 in a million. The largest contributor to this risk was diesel exhaust, accounting for 71 percent of the air toxics risk. In 2008, SCAQMD conducted its third update to its study on ambient concentrations of TACs and estimated the potential health risks from air toxics. The results showed that the overall risk for excess cancer from a lifetime exposure to ambient levels of air toxics was about 1,200 in one million. The largest contributor to this risk was diesel exhaust, accounting for approximately 84 percent of the air toxics risk (SCAQMD 2008). EXISTING AMBIENT AIR QUALITY Existing levels of ambient air quality and historical trends and projections in the vicinity of the project site are best documented by measurements taken by the SCAQMD. The project site is in Source Receptor Area (SRA) 17 – Central Orange County. The air quality monitoring station in SRA 17 closest to the project is the Anaheim Monitoring Station. Because this station does not monitor SO2, data from the Costa Mesa Monitoring Station was obtained. The most current five years of data monitored at these monitoring stations are included in Table 3. The data show recurring violations of both the state and federal O3 standards. The data also indicate that the area consistently exceeds the state PM10 standards and federal PM2.5 standard. The CO, SO2, and NO2 standard have not been violated in the last five years at this station. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 10 Table 3 Ambient Air Quality Monitoring Summary Pollutant/Standard Number of Days Threshold Were Exceeded and Maximum Levels during Such Violations 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 Ozone (O3)1 State 1-Hour ≥ 0.09 ppm State 8-hour ≥ 0.07 ppm Federal 8-Hour > 0.075 ppm Max. 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) Max. 8-Hour Conc. (ppm) 2 10 5 0.105 0.086 0 2 1 0.093 0.077 1 1 1 0.104 0.088 0 1 0 0.088 0.072 0 0 0 0.079 0.068 Carbon Monoxide (CO)1 State 8-Hour > 9.0 ppm Federal 8-Hour ≥ 9.0 ppm Max. 8-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0 0 3.44 0 0 2.73 0 0 1.98 0 0 2.08 0 0 2.34 Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)1 State 1-Hour ≥ 0.18 ppm Max. 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0 0.093 0 0.068 0 0.073 0 0.074 0 0.067 Sulfur Dioxide (SO2)2 State 1-Hour ≥ 0.04 ppm Max. 1-Hour Conc. (ppm) 0 0.003 0 0.004 0 0.002 - - - - Coarse Particulates (PM10)2 State 24-Hour > 50 µg/m3 Federal 24-Hour > 150 µg/m3 Max. 24-Hour Conc. (µg/m3) 3 0 111.5 1 0 97.4 0 0 43 2 0 53 0 0 48 Fine Particulates (PM2.5) Federal 24-Hour > 35 µg/m3 Max. 24-Hour Conc. (µg/m3) 5 67.8 5 64.5 0 31.7 2 39.2 4 50.1 Source: CARB 2013 Notes: ppm: parts per million; µg/m3: or micrograms per cubic meter; NS: No Standard. 1 Data obtained from the Anaheim Monitoring Station located at 1630 W Pampas Lane, Anaheim CA 2 Data obtained from the Costa Mesa Monitoring Station located at 2850 Mesa Verde Dr East, Costa Mesa CA.SO2 data is unavailable for the years 2011 and 2012. SENSITIVE RECEPTORS Some land uses are considered more sensitive to air pollution than others due to the types of population groups or activities involved. Sensitive population groups include children, the elderly, the acutely ill, and the chronically ill, especially those with cardio-respiratory diseases. Residential areas are also considered to be sensitive receptors to air pollution because residents (including children and the elderly) tend to be at home for extended periods of time, resulting in sustained exposure to any pollutants present. Schools are also considered sensitive receptors, as children are present for extended durations and engage in regular outdoor activities. Recreational land uses are considered moderately sensitive to air pollution. Although exposure periods are generally short, exercise places a high demand on respiratory functions, which can be impaired by air pollution. In addition, noticeable air pollution can detract from the enjoyment of recreation. Industrial and commercial areas are considered the least sensitive to air pollution. Exposure periods are relatively short and intermittent, as the majority of the workers tend to stay indoors most of the time. In addition, the working population is generally the healthiest segment of the public. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 11 METHODOLOGY Projected construction-related air pollutant emissions are calculated using the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod), Version 2011.1.1, distributed by the SCAQMD. CalEEMod compiles an emissions inventory of construction(fugitive dust, off-gas emissions, onroad emissions, and offroad emissions), area sources, indirect emissions from energy use, mobile sources, indirect emissions from waste disposal (annual only), and indirect emissions from water/wastewater (annual only) use. The calculated emissions of the project are compared to thresholds of significance for individual projects using the SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Analysis Guidance Handbook. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The City of Anaheim has not adopted specific significance thresholds for air quality impacts. However, because of the SCAQMD’s regulatory role in the SoCAB, the significance thresholds developed for CEQA projects in the SoCAB will be used in evaluating project impacts. The analysis of the proposed project’s air quality impacts follows the guidance and methodologies recommended in SCAQMD’s CEQA Air Quality Handbook and the significance thresholds on SCAQMD’s website.3 CEQA allows the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district to be used to assess impacts of a project on air quality. SCAQMD has established thresholds of significance for regional air quality emissions for construction activities and project operation. In addition to the daily thresholds listed above, projects are also subject to the AAQS. These are addressed though an analysis of localized CO impacts and localized significance thresholds (LSTs). Regional Significance Thresholds SCAQMD has adopted regional construction and operational emissions thresholds to determine a project’s cumulative impact on air quality in the SoCAB. Table 4 lists SCAQMD’s regional significance thresholds. Table 4 SCAQMD Significance Thresholds Air Pollutant Construction Phase Operational Phase Reactive Organic Gases (ROGs)/ Volatile Organic Compounds (VOCs) 75 lbs/day 55 lbs/day Carbon Monoxide (CO) 550 lbs/day 550 lbs/day Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 100 lbs/day 55 lbs/day Sulfur Oxides (SOX) 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day Particulates (PM10) 150 lbs/day 150 lbs/day Particulates (PM2.5) 55 lbs/day 55 lbs/day Source: SCAQMD 2011. CO Hotspots Areas of vehicle congestion have the potential to create pockets of CO called hot spots. These pockets have the potential to exceed the state one-hour standard of 20 ppm or the eight-hour standard of 9 ppm. Because CO is produced in greatest quantities from vehicle combustion and does not readily disperse into the atmosphere, adherence to ambient air quality standards is typically demonstrated through an analysis of localized CO concentrations. Hot spots are typically produced at intersections, where traffic 3 SCAQMD’s Air Quality Significance Thresholds are current as of March 2011 and can be found here: http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/hdbk.html. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 12 congestion is highest because vehicles queue for longer periods and are subject to reduced speeds. Typically, for an intersection to exhibit a significant CO concentration, it would operate at level of service (LOS) E or worse without improvements (Caltrans 1997). However, at the time of the 1993 Handbook, the SoCAB was designated nonattainment under the California AAQS and National AAQS for CO. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the SoCAB and in the state have steadily declined. In 2007, the SoCAB was designated in attainment for CO under both the California AAQS and National AAQS. The CO hot spot analysis conducted for the attainment by SCAQMD for busiest intersections in Los Angeles during the peak morning and afternoon periods plan did not predict a violation of CO standards. 4 As identified in SCAQMD's 2003 AQMP and the 1992 Federal Attainment Plan for Carbon Monoxide (1992 CO Plan), peak carbon monoxide concentrations in the SoCAB in previous years, prior to redesignation, were a result of unusual meteorological and topographical conditions and not a result of congestion at a particular intersection. Under existing and future vehicle emission rates, a project would have to increase traffic volumes at a single intersection by more than 44,000 vehicles per hour—or 24,000 vehicles per hour where vertical and/or horizontal air does not mix—in order to generate a significant CO impact (BAAQMD 2011). Localized Significance Thresholds SCAQMD developed localized significance thresholds (LSTs) for emissions of NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 generated at the project site (offsite mobile-source emissions are not included the LST analysis). LSTs represent the maximum emissions at a project site that are not expected to cause or contribute to an exceedance of the most stringent federal or state AAQS. LSTs are based on the ambient concentrations of that pollutant within the project SRA and the distance to the nearest sensitive receptor. LST analysis for construction is applicable to all projects of five acres and less; however, it can be used as screening criteria for larger projects to determine whether or not dispersion modeling may be required. In accordance with SCAQMD’s LST methodology, construction LSTs are based on the acreage disturbed per day based on equipment use. Based on the anticipated equipment use, construction activities would disturb over 1.5 acres per day during overlap of construction activities, and therefore the 1.5-acre LST is the significance localized thresholds for construction. The construction LST in SRA 17 is shown in Table 5 for sensitive receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). Table 5 SCAQMD Construction Localized Significance Thresholds Air Pollutant Threshold (lbs/day) Construction 1 Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) 98 Carbon Monoxide (CO) 600 Coarse Particulates (PM10) 5 Fine Particulates (PM2.5) 3 Source: SCAQMD 2003; SCAQMD 2006, Based on receptors in SRA 17. Notes: 1 Construction LSTs are based on 1.5 acres disturbed per day with receptors within 82 feet (25 meters). 4 The four intersections were: Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway; Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard. The busiest intersection evaluated (Wilshire and Veteran) had a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day with LOS E in the morning peak hour and LOS F in the evening peak hour. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 13 Health Risk Thresholds A project would expose sensitive receptors to elevated pollutant concentrations if it would place the project in an area with pollutant concentrations above ambient concentrations in the SoCAB. Recent air pollution studies have shown an association between proximity to major air pollution sources and a variety of health effects, which are attributed to a high concentration of air pollutants. Guidance from the California Air Resources Board (CARB) and the California Air Pollutant Control Officer’s Association (CAPCOA) recommends the evaluation of vehicle-generated emissions when freeways are within 500 feet of sensitive land uses (i.e., residences, schools, daycare centers, and hospitals). Whenever a project would require use of chemical compounds that have been identified in SCAQMD Rule 1401, placed on CARB’s air toxics list pursuant to AB 1807, or placed on the EPA’s National Emissions Standards for Hazardous Air Pollutants, a health risk assessment is required by the SCAQMD. Table 6 lists the SCAQMD’s TAC incremental risk thresholds for operation of a project. Residential, commercial, and office uses do not use substantial quantities of TACs, and these thresholds are typically applied for new industrial projects. Although not officially adopted by SCAQMD, these thresholds are also commonly used to determine air quality land use compatibility of a project with major sources of TACs within 1,000 feet of a proposed project. The proposed project is not considered a sensitive land use and is not a substantial generator of TACs that would require permitting by SCAQMD. Table 6 SCAQMD Toxic Air Contaminants Incremental Risk Thresholds Maximum Incremental Cancer Risk ≥ 10 in 1 million Hazard Index (project increment) ≥ 1.0 Source: SCAQMD 2011. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 14 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS Scientists have concluded that human activities are contributing to global climate change by adding large amounts of heat-trapping gases, known as GHG, to the atmosphere. Climate change is the variation of Earth’s climate over time, whether due to natural variability or as a result of human activities. The primary source of these GHG is fossil fuel use. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has identified four major GHG—water vapor,5 carbon (CO2), methane (CH4), and ozone (O3)— that are the likely cause of an increase in global average temperatures observed within the 20th and 21st centuries. Other GHG identified by the IPCC that contribute to global warming to a lesser extent include nitrous oxide (N2O), sulfur hexafluoride (SF6), hydrofluorocarbons, perfluorocarbons, and chlorofluorocarbons (IPCC 2001). REGULATORY SETTINGS Regulation of GHG Emissions on a National Level The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) announced on December 7, 2009, that GHG emissions threaten the public health and welfare of the American people and that GHG emissions from on-road vehicles contribute to that threat. The EPA’s final findings respond to the 2007 U.S. Supreme Court decision that GHG emissions fit within the Clean Air Act definition of air pollutants. The findings do not in and of themselves impose any emission reduction requirements, but allow the EPA to finalize the GHG standards proposed in 2009 for new light-duty vehicles as part of the joint rulemaking with the Department of Transportation (EPA 2009). The EPA’s endangerment finding covers emissions of six key GHGs—CO2, CH4, N2O, hydro fluorocarbons, per fluorocarbons, and SF6—that have been the subject of scrutiny and intense analysis for decades by scientists in the United States and around the world (the first three are applicable to the proposed project). In response to the endangerment finding, the EPA issued the Mandatory Reporting of GHG Rule that requires substantial emitters of GHG emissions (large stationary sources, etc.) to report GHG emissions data. Facilities that emit 25,000 metric tons (MT) or more of CO2 per year are required to submit an annual report. Regulation of GHG Emissions on a State Level Current State of California guidance and goals for reductions in GHG emissions are generally embodied in Executive Order S-03-05, Assembly Bill 32, and Senate Bill 375. Executive Order S-03-05 Executive Order S-3-05, signed June 1, 2005. Executive Order S-03-05 set the following GHG reduction targets for the State: • 2000 levels by 2010 • 1990 levels by 2020 • 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050 5 Water vapor (H2O) is the strongest GHG and the most variable in its phases (vapor, cloud droplets, ice crystals). However, water vapor is not considered a pollutant. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 15 Assembly Bill 32 Current State of California guidance and goals for reductions in GHG emissions are generally embodied in Assembly Bill 32 (AB 32), the Global Warming Solutions Act. AB 32 was passed by the California state legislature on August 31, 2006, to place the state on a course toward reducing its contribution of GHG emissions. AB 32 follows the 2020 tier of emissions reduction targets established in Executive Order S- 3-05. AB 32 directed CARB to adopt discrete early action measures to reduce GHG emissions and outline additional reduction measures to meet the 2020 target. Based on the GHG emissions inventory conducted for the Scoping Plan by CARB, GHG emissions in California by 2020 are anticipated to be approximately 596 MMTCO2e. In December 2007, CARB approved a 2020 emissions limit of 427 MMTCO2e (471 million tons) for the State. The 2020 target requires a total emissions reduction of 169 MMTons, 28.5 percent from the projected emissions of the business-as-usual (BAU) scenario for the year 2020 (i.e. 28.5 percent of 596 MMTCO2e) (CARB 2008).6 In order to effectively implement the emissions cap, AB 32 directed CARB to establish a mandatory reporting system to track and monitor GHG emissions levels for large stationary sources that generate more than 25,000 MT of CO2 per year, prepare a plan demonstrating how the 2020 deadline can be met, and develop appropriate regulations and programs to implement the plan by 2012. The Climate Action Registry Reporting Online Tool was established through the Climate Action Registry to track GHG emissions. CARB 2008 Scoping Plan The final Scoping Plan was adopted by CARB on December 11, 2008. Table 7 lists the 2008 Scoping Plan measures and associated reductions. Key elements of CARB’s GHG reduction plan that may be applicable to the proposed project include: • Expanding and strengthening existing energy efficiency programs as well as building and appliance standards (adopted and cycle updates in progress); • Achieving a mix of 33 percent for energy generation from renewable sources (anticipated by 2020); • A California cap-and-trade program that links with other Western Climate Initiative partner programs to create a regional market system for large stationary sources (adopted 2011); • Establishing targets for transportation-related GHG emissions for regions throughout California, and pursuing policies and incentives to achieve those targets (several Sustainable Communities Strategies have been adopted); • Adopting and implementing measures pursuant to State laws and policies, including California’s clean car standards (amendments to the Pavley Standards adopted 2009; Advanced Clean Car standard adopted 2012), goods movement measures, and the Low Carbon Fuel Standard (LCFS)(adopted 2009).7 6 CARB defines BAU in its Scoping Plan as emissions levels that would occur if California continued to grow and add new GHG emissions but did not adopt any measures to reduce emissions. Projections for each emission-generating sector were compiled and used to estimate emissions for 2020 based on 2002–2004 emissions intensities. Under CARB’s definition of BAU, new growth is assumed to have the same carbon intensities as was typical from 2002 through 2004. 7 On December 29, 2011, the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of California issued several rulings in the federal lawsuits Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 16 • Creating target fees, including a public goods charge on water use, fees on high global warming potential gases, and a fee to fund the administrative costs of the state’s long-term commitment to AB 32 implementation (in progress). While local government operations were not accounted for in achieving the 2020 emissions reduction, CARB estimates that land use changes implemented by local governments that integrate jobs, housing, and services result in a reduction of 5 MMTCO2e, which is approximately 3 percent of the 2020 GHG emissions reduction goal. In recognition of the critical role local governments play in the successful implementation of AB 32, CARB is recommending GHG reduction goals of 15 percent of today’s levels by 2020 to ensure that municipal and community-wide emissions match the State’s reduction target.8 Measures that local governments take to support shifts in land use patterns are anticipated to emphasize compact, low-impact growth over development in green fields, resulting in fewer VMT (CARB 2008). Table 7 Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures and Reductions toward 2020 Target Recommended Reduction Measures Reductions Counted toward 2020 Target of 169 MMT CO2e Percentage of Statewide 2020 Target Cap and Trade Program and Associated Measures California Light-Duty Vehicle GHG Standards 31.7 19% Energy Efficiency 26.3 16% Renewable Portfolio Standard (33 percent by 2020) 21.3 13% Low Carbon Fuel Standard 15 9% Regional Transportation-Related GHG Targets1 5 3% Vehicle Efficiency Measures 4.5 3% Goods Movement 3.7 2% Million Solar Roofs 2.1 1% Medium/Heavy Duty Vehicles 1.4 1% High Speed Rail 1.0 1% Industrial Measures 0.3 0% Additional Reduction Necessary to Achieve Cap 34.4 20% Total Cap and Trade Program Reductions 146.7 87% Uncapped Sources/Sectors Measures High Global Warming Potential Gas Measures 20.2 12% Sustainable Forests 5 3% Industrial Measures (for sources not covered under cap and trade program) 1.1 1% Recycling and Waste (landfill methane capture) 1 1% challenging the LCFS. One of the court’s rulings preliminarily enjoins the CARB from enforcing the regulation during the pendency of the litigation. In January 2012, CARB appealed the decision and on April 23, 2012, the Ninth Circuit Court granted CARB’s motion for a stay of the injunction while it continues to consider CARB’s appeal of the lower court’s decision. 8 While the Scoping Plan references a goal for local governments to reduce community GHG emissions by 15 percent from current (interpreted as 2008) levels by 2020, the Scoping Plan does not rely on local GHG reduction targets established by local governments to meet the State’s GHG reduction target of AB 32. Table 7 lists the recommended reduction measures, which do not include additional reductions from local measures. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 17 Table 7 Scoping Plan Greenhouse Gas Reduction Measures and Reductions toward 2020 Target Recommended Reduction Measures Reductions Counted toward 2020 Target of 169 MMT CO2e Percentage of Statewide 2020 Target Total Uncapped Sources/Sectors Reductions 27.3 16% Total Reductions Counted toward 2020 Target 174 100% Other Recommended Measures – Not Counted toward 2020 Target State Government Operations 1.0 to 2.0 1% Local Government Operations2 To Be Determined2 NA Green Buildings 26 15% Recycling and Waste 9 5% Water Sector Measures 4.8 3% Methane Capture at Large Dairies 1 1% Total Other Recommended Measures – Not Counted toward 2020 Target 42.8 NA Source: CARB 2008. Note: the percentages in the right-hand column add up to more than 100 percent because the emissions reduction goal is 169 MMTons and the Scoping Plan identifies 174 MMTons of emissions reductions strategies. MMTCO2e: million metric tons of CO2e 1 Reductions represent an estimate of what may be achieved from local land use changes. It is not the SB 375 regional target. A discussion of the regional targets for the Southern California Region and local land use changes recommended within the Southern California Association of Government’s (SCAG) Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) are included later in this section. 2 According to the Measure Documentation Supplement to the Scoping Plan, local government actions and targets are anticipated to reduce vehicle miles by approximately 2 percent through land use planning, resulting in a potential GHG reduction of 2 million metric tons of CO2e (or approximately 1.2 percent of the GHG reduction target). However, these reductions were not included in the Scoping Plan reductions to achieve the 2020 target. SB 375 – Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) / Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) In 2008, SB 375 was adopted and was intended to represent the implementation mechanism necessary to achieve the GHG emissions reductions targets established in the Scoping Plan for the transportation sector as it relates to local land use decisions that affect travel behavior. Implementation is intended to reduce GHG emissions from light-duty trucks and automobiles (excludes emissions associated with goods movement) by aligning regional long-range transportation plans, investments, and housing allocations with local land use planning to reduce vehicle miles traveled and vehicle trips. Specifically, SB 375 requires CARB to establish GHG emissions reduction targets for each of the 17 regions in California managed by a metropolitan planning organization (MPO). Pursuant to the recommendations of the Regional Transportation Advisory Committee, CARB adopted per capita reduction targets for each of the MPOs rather than a total magnitude reduction target. SCAG is the MPO for the southern California region, which includes the counties of Los Angeles, Orange, San Bernardino County, Riverside, Ventura, and Imperial. SCAG's targets are an 8 percent per capita reduction from 2005 GHG emission levels by 2020 and a 13 percent per capita reduction from 2005 GHG emission levels by 2035. The 2020 targets are smaller than the 2035 targets because a significant portion of the built environment in 2020 has been defined by decisions that have already been made. In general, the 2020 scenarios reflect that more time is needed for large land use and transportation infrastructure changes. Most of the reductions in the interim are anticipated to come from improving the efficiency of the region's existing transportation network. Adherence to the targets would result in 3 MMTons of GHG reductions by 2020 and 15 MMTons of GHG reductions by 2035. Based on these reductions, the passenger vehicle target in CARB's Scoping Plan (for AB 32) would be met (CARB 2010). Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 18 SB 375 requires the MPOs to prepare a Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) in their regional transportation plan. For the SCAG region, the Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) was adopted April 2012 (SCAG 2012). The SCS sets forth a development pattern for the region, which, when integrated with the transportation network and other transportation measures and policies, would reduce GHG emissions from transportation (excluding goods movement). The SCS is meant to provide growth strategies that will achieve the regional GHG emissions reduction targets. However, the SCS does not require that local general plans, specific plans, or zoning be consistent with the SCS, but provides incentives for consistency for governments and developers. Assembly Bill 1493 California vehicle GHG emission standards were enacted under AB 1493 (Pavley I). Pavley I is a clean- car standard that reduces GHG emissions from new passenger vehicles (light-duty auto to medium-duty vehicles) from 2009 through 2016 and is anticipated to reduce GHG emissions from new passenger vehicles by 30 percent in 2016. California implements the Pavley I standards through a waiver granted to California by the EPA. In 2012, the EPA issued a Final Rulemaking that sets even more stringent fuel economy and GHG emissions standards for model year 2017 through 2025 light-duty vehicles. Executive Order S-01-07 On January 18, 2007, the State set a new Low Carbon Fuel Standard for transportation fuels sold within the State. Executive Order S-1-07 sets a declining standard for GHG emissions measured in carbon dioxide equivalent gram per unit of fuel energy sold in California. The LCFS requires a reduction of 2.5 percent in the carbon intensity of California’s transportation fuels by 2015 and a reduction of at least 10 percent by 2020. The Low Carbon Fuel Standard applies to refiners, blenders, producers, and importers of transportation fuels and would use market-based mechanisms to allow these providers to choose how they reduce emissions during the “fuel cycle” using the most economically feasible methods. Senate Bills 1078 and 107, and Executive Order S-14-08 A major component of California’s Renewable Energy Program is the renewable portfolio standard (RPS) established under Senate Bills 1078 (Sher) and 107 (Simitian). Under the RPS, certain retail sellers of electricity were required to increase the amount of renewable energy each year by at least 1 percent in order to reach at least 20 percent by December 30, 2010. CARB has now approved an even higher goal of 33 percent by 2020. In 2011, the state legislature adopted this higher standard in SBX1-2. Executive Order S-14-08 was signed in November 2008, which expands the state’s Renewable Energy Standard to 33 percent renewable power by 2020. Renewable sources of electricity include wind, small hydropower, solar, geothermal, biomass, and biogas. The increase in renewable sources for electricity production will decrease indirect GHG emissions from development projects because electricity production from renewable sources is generally considered carbon neutral. California Building Code Energy conservation standards for new residential and nonresidential buildings were adopted by the California Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission in June 1977 and most recently revised in 2008 (Title 24, Part 6, of the California Code of Regulations [CCR]). Title 24 requires the design of building shells and building components to conserve energy. The standards are updated periodically to allow for consideration and possible incorporation of new energy efficiency technologies and methods. On May 31, 2012, the CEC adopted the 2013 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards, which go into effect on January 1, 2014. Buildings that are constructed in accordance with the 2013 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards are 25 percent (residential) to 30 percent (nonresidential) more energy efficient than the 2008 standards as a result of better windows, insulation, lighting, ventilation systems, and other features that reduce energy consumption in homes and businesses. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 19 On July 17, 2008, the California Building Standards Commission adopted the nation’s first green building standards. The California Green Building Standards Code (Part 11, Title 24, known as “CALGreen”) was adopted as part of the California Building Standards Code (Title 24, California Code of Regulations). CALGreen established planning and design standards for sustainable site development, energy efficiency (in excess of the California Energy Code requirements), water conservation, material conservation, and internal air contaminants.9 The mandatory provisions of the California Green Building Code Standards became effective January 1, 2011. 2006 Appliance Efficiency Regulations The 2006 Appliance Efficiency Regulations (Title 20, CCR Sections 1601 through 1608) were adopted by the California Energy Commission on October 11, 2006, and approved by the California Office of Administrative Law on December 14, 2006. The regulations include standards for both federally regulated appliances and non-federally regulated appliances. While these regulations are now often viewed as “business-as-usual,” they exceed the standards imposed by all other states and they reduce GHG emissions by reducing energy demand. THRESHOLDS OF SIGNIFICANCE The CEQA Guidelines recommend that a lead agency consider the following when assessing the significance of impacts from GHG emissions on the environment: 1. The extent to which the project may increase (or reduce) GHG emissions as compared to the existing environmental setting; 2. Whether the project emissions exceed a threshold of significance that the lead agency determines applies to the project; 3. The extent to which the project complies with regulations or requirements adopted to implement an adopted statewide, regional, or local plan for the reduction or mitigation of GHG emissions.10 South Coast Air Quality Management District To provide guidance to local lead agencies on determining significance for GHG emissions in their CEQA documents, SCAQMD has convened a GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group (Working Group). Based on the last Working Group meeting (Meeting No. 15) held in September 2010, SCAQMD is proposing to adopt a tiered approach for evaluating GHG emissions for development projects where SCAQMD is not the lead agency: Tier 1 If a project is exempt from CEQA, project-level and cumulative GHG emissions are less than significant. Tier 2 If the project complies with a GHG emissions reduction plan or mitigation program that avoids or substantially reduces GHG emissions in the project’s geographic area (i.e., city or county), project-level and cumulative GHG emissions are less than significant. 9 The green building standards became mandatory in the 2010 edition of the code. 10 The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research recommendations include a requirement that such a plan must be adopted through a public review process and include specific requirements that reduce or mitigate the project’s incremental contribution of GHG emissions. If there is substantial evidence that the possible effects of a particular project are still cumulatively considerable, notwithstanding compliance with the adopted regulations or requirements, an EIR must be prepared for the project. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 20 For projects that are not exempt or where no qualifying GHG reduction plans are directly applicable, SCAQMD requires an assessment of GHG emissions. SCAQMD is proposing a screening-level threshold of 3,000 MTons annually for all land use types or the following land-use-specific thresholds: 1,400 MTons for commercial projects, 3,500 MTons for residential projects, or 3,000 MTons for mixed-use projects. This bright-line threshold is based on a review of the Governor’s Office of Planning and Research database of CEQA projects. Based on their review of 711 CEQA projects, 90 percent of CEQA projects would exceed the bright-line thresholds identified above. Therefore, projects that do not exceed the bright-line threshold would have a nominal, and therefore, less than cumulatively considerable impact on GHG emissions: Tier 3 If GHG emissions are less than the screening-level threshold, project-level and cumulative GHG emissions are less than significant. Tier 4 If emissions exceed the screening threshold, a more detailed review of the project’s GHG emissions is warranted. SCAQMD has proposed to adopt an efficiency target for projects that exceed the screening threshold. The current recommended approach is per capita efficiency targets. SCAQMD is not recommending use of a percent emissions reduction target. Instead, SCAQMD proposes a 2020 efficiency target of 4.8 MTons per year per service population (MTons/year/SP) for project-level analyses and 6.6 MTons/year/SP for plan level projects (e.g., program-level projects such as general plans).11 The per capita efficiency targets are based on the AB 32 GHG reduction target and 2020 GHG emissions inventory prepared for CARB’s 2008 Scoping Plan.12 For the purpose of this project, SCAQMD’s project- level thresholds are used. If projects exceed these per capita efficiency targets, GHG emissions would be considered potentially significant in the absence of mitigation measures. 11 It should be noted that the Working Group also considered efficiency targets for 2035 for the first time in this Working Group meeting. 12 SCAQMD took the 2020 statewide GHG reduction target for land use only GHG emissions sectors and divided it by the 2020 statewide employment for the land use sectors to derive a per capita GHG efficiency metric that coincides with the GHG reduction targets of AB 32 for year 2020. Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Background and Modeling Data Page 21 BIBLIOGRAPHY Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD). 2011. California Environmental Quality Act Air Quality Guidelines. California Air Resources Board (CARB), 2012, April. California Greenhouse Gas Inventory for 2000-2009 – by Category as Defined by the Scoping Plan. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/inventory/inventory.htm ———. 2013, July. Ambient Air Quality Standards. http://www.arb.ca.gov/research/aaqs/aaqs2.pdf. ———.2013, April. Area Designations: Activities and Maps. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm ———. 2008, October. Climate Change Proposed Scoping Plan, a Framework for Change. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 1997, December. Transportation Project-Level Carbon Monoxide Protocol. UCD-ITS-RR-97-21. Prepared by Institute of Transportation Studies, University of California, Davis. United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), 2009. EPA: Greenhouse Gases Threaten Public Health and the Environment. Science overwhelmingly shows greenhouse gas concentrations at unprecedented levels due to human activity. December. http://yosemite.epa.gov/opa/admpress.nsf/0/08D11A451131BCA585257685005BF252. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC). 2001. 2001 IPCC Third Assessment Report: Climate Change 2001. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2012. Air Quality Analysis Handbook. Updates to CEQA Air Quality Handbook. http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/hdbk.html. ———. 2010, September 28. Greenhouse Gases (GHG) CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting 15. http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/GHG/2010/sept28mtg/sept29.html ———. 2008, September. Multiple Air Toxics Exposure Study in the South Coast Air Basin (MATES III). ———. 2005, May. Guidance Document for Addressing Air Quality Issues in General Plans and Local Planning. Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). 2012, April. 2012-2035 Regional Transportation Plan/ Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS). http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Pages/default.aspx Western Regional Climate Center (WRCC). 2012. Western U.S. Historical Summaries –Fullerton Hillcrest Monitoring Station (Station ID No. 047888). ASSUMPTIONS Servite High School Improvement Project - Air Quality/GHG Assumptions 0.1Location:1952 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CAAir Basin:South Coast Air BasinAir District:South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictClimate Zone:8SRA:17 Utility Utility Company SCECO2 Intensity Factor 641.26CH4 Intensity Factor 0.029N2O Intensity Factor 0.011 ExistingTotal Site Acreage 15.5 acresServite High School 950 students enrolled (2012-2013)Other Facilities: Basball field, football/soccer field, swimming pool SQFT Servite High School Music/Weight Room/ClassRoom:9,000 4 residences SQFT 954 North Keystone:2,782 950 North Keystone:2,002 944 North Keystone:1,439 940 North Keystone:(no exist. Bldg) 934 North Keystone:1,560 Total SQFT7,783 16,783 PROJECT Demolition: Bleacher Capacity 450 peopleStadium:133 sq.ft 0.003 acresAquatic Center 18,300 sq.ftAquatic Center Building:4,500 sq.ftAsphalt Surface 0.148 acres Music Room 7,800 sq.ft 0.179 acresWeight Room 1,200 sq.ft 0.0275 acres 4 residences, existing swimming pool, music room and weight room Construction Model Run - 2 Baseball Building Construction Model Run 1 - Aquatics Center, Music Room, Wieght Room, Paving Servite High School Improvement Project - Air Quality/GHG Assumptions 0.1Location:1952 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CAAir Basin:South Coast Air BasinAir District:South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictClimate Zone:8SRA:17 Baseball Building 3,695 sq.ft 0.084 acres Event Type School Events/Year Event Capacity type Capacity AttendanceCapacity events - Aquatic Center 52 Capacity 450 Servite High School Improvement Project - Air Quality/GHG Assumptions 0.1Location:1952 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CAAir Basin:South Coast Air BasinAir District:South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictClimate Zone:8SRA:17 Trip Generation:Based on City of Anaheim's Parking Requirement*Source - Garland Associates 2011 Trips CalEEMod Trip RateAquatic Center 165 0.37 Trip Length CALEEMOD DefaultNote: Modeling assumes 52 events per year and therefore modeling is conservative. Water From Initial Studycubic meter GallonsExisting Pool Capacity*1,272 336,753New Pool Capacity*3,832 1,014,435Additional Capacity 2,560 677,682 Indoor waste waterIndoor (wastewater)Outdoor TOTAL Gallons/Yr Gallons/Yr Gallons/YrFull Capacity Events**93,600 0 93,600Total771,282 *Assuming 10' depth overall **Waste water generated by events at the aquatic center Waste CalEEMod Default for Arena Waste:0.01 tons /100 visitorsStadium2.3 tons/year *Assuming water to be changed once every year Source: http://www.bayrol.com/en/swimming-pool-water-care-tips/pool-season-winterising/index.html **Assuming waste water generation of 4 gallons/seat. OPERATIONS Servite High School Improvement Project - Air Quality/GHG Assumptions 0.1Location:1952 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CAAir Basin:South Coast Air BasinAir District:South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictClimate Zone:8SRA:17 Electricity SCE Lighting Calculated offmodel (outside CalEEMod)Number of Lamps:13 Electricity:from Musco Lighting 2012 TotalNumber of Luminaires:94average kw for System Events/Year Hours KwhTotal Usage 180 x 174 31320 Calculation of GHGs from Field Lighting (SCE)CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2e1000 lbs/kwh 1000 lbs/kwh 1000 lbs/kwh 1000 lbs/kwh MTons/Kwh641.26 0.03 0.01 641.30 0.000291 MTons/YearCO2 from Lighting 9 Servite High School Improvement Project - Air Quality/GHG Assumptions 0.1Location:1952 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CAAir Basin:South Coast Air BasinAir District:South Coast Air Quality Management DistrictClimate Zone:8SRA:17 *New trips generated only by the bleachers to be constructed in the Aquatic center *Waste water discharge from Swimming pool in the aquatic center has been included in the analysis *Music and Weight rooms only re-oriented on site. No increase in area of these buildings. Old Buildings to be demolished and new buildings to be constructed. No new trips and no increase in utility usage anticipated. Hence no quantitative analysis required for the music and weight room buildings (i.e., buildings are demolished and replaced onsite). Modeling is conservative because it does not net out the reduction in energy use, area sources, and mobile sources from the 4 existing residential buildings. Major Operational Assumptions Building Demol Volume 772.018 tons Demolition Volume - Swimming Pool, Building Pads, Other (driveways, hardscape, etc.)5,539 tons Equipment # of Equipment HP Load Factor Hrs/ DayDemolition - Swimming Pool, Music building, Weight roomConcrete/Industrial Saws 1 81 0.73 8Rubber Tired Dozers 1 255 0.4 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 0.37 6Vendor Trips 4 Demol Volumes Construction Equipment Details - CalEEMod Defaults Construction Activities Start Date End Date Duration (Day) DemolitionMusic/Weight/Classroom bldgs; Existing Pool Complex 6/1/2014 7/1/2014 22 Phase 2 - Construction of Proposed Improvements AQUATICS CENTERSite Preparation 7/1/2014 8/1/2014 24 Site Preparation Soil HaulRough Grading 8/1/2014 9/1/2014 22 Rough Grading Soil HaulFine Grading 9/1/2014 9/15/2014 11 Fine Grading Soil HaulTrenching/Utilities 8/1/2014 9/1/2014 22Building Construction 9/15/2014 3/15/2015 130Architectural Coating 3/15/2015 3/24/2015 7Paving3/15/2015 3/24/2015 7Finishing/Landscaping 3/22/2015 4/1/2015 8 BASEBALL FIELDSite Preparation Site Preparation Soil Haul 7/15/2015 8/1/2015 13Rough Grading Rough Grading Soil Haul 8/2/2015 8/15/2015 10Fine Grading Fine Grading Soil Haul 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 10Trenching/Utilities 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 10Building Construction 8/31/2015 1/1/2016 90Architectural Coating 1/1/2016 1/7/2016 5PavingN/AFinishing/Landscaping 1/1/2016 4/1/2016 66 Construction Schedule EQUIPMENT LIST Equipment # of Equipment HP Hrs/ DaySite PreparationGraders 1 174 8Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 97 8Water TrucksRough GradingConcrete/Industrial Saws 1 81 8Rubber Tired Dozers 1 255 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 6Haul Quantity (Export)3,450 cyWater TrucksFine GradingConcrete/Industrial Saws 1 81 8Rubber Tired Dozers 1 255 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 6Import Quantity 1,010 cyExport Quantity 2,440 cyWater TrucksUtility TrenchingCranes 1 226 4Forklifts2896Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 8Water TrucksBuilding ConstructionCranes 1 226 4Forklifts2896Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 8PavingCement and Mortar Mixers 4 9 6Pavers11257Rollers1807Architectural CoatingsAir Compressors 1 78 6Finishing/LandscapingCranes 1 226 4Forklifts2896Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 8 Construction Equipment Details - CalEEMod Defaults 4 Construction Equipment Details 4 4 4 EQUIPMENT LIST Equipment # of Equipment HP Hrs/ DaySite PreparationGraders 1 174 8Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 97 8Rough GradingConcrete/Industrial Saws 1 81 8Rubber Tired Dozers 1 255 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 6Export Volume 28Fine GradingConcrete/Industrial Saws 1 81 8Rubber Tired Dozers 1 255 1Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 6Utility TrenchingExcavator 1 163 8Building ConstructionCranes 1 226 4Forklifts2896Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 8Architectural CoatingAir Compressors 1 78 6Finishing/LandscapingCranes 1 226 4Forklifts2896Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 97 8 Construction Equipment Details Construction Equipment Details - CalEEMod Defaults Changes to the CalEEMod Defaults - Fleet Mix (2016 Fleet Mix) Countywide fleet mix not applicable at a project level:Default LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MHFleetMix0.511008 0.057223 0.191597 0.152361 0.041328 0.005882 0.015289 0.014281 0.001428 0.002141 0.004713 0.000509 0.002239 100%Trips 84 9 32 25 7 1 3 2 0 0 1 0 0 165Percent0.764541 0.152361 0.083097 100%Proportion 0.668385 0.074846 0.250604 1.000000 0.497346 0.070785 0.183990 0.171859 0.017185 0.025765 0.006164 0.006125 0.026944Assumed Mix 0.97 0.02 0.01 100.0%adjusted with Assumed 0.648334 0.072601 0.243086 0.020000 0.004973 0.000708 0.001840 0.001719 0.000172 0.000258 0.005980 0.000061 0.000269 1Trips10712403100000100165Calibrated so no MH, HHDT, MHDT, or UBUS 0.648334 0.072601 0.243086 0.020000 0 0 0 0 0.000172 0.000000 0.005980 0.000061 0 99.0% Modified 0.654728 0.073317 0.245483 0.020197 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000174 0.000000 0.006039 0.000062 0.000000 100.0%Trips 108 12 41 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 165 Trips 165Assumes no light-heavy duty, medium-heavy duty or heavy-heavy duty trucks, urban buses, or motor homes associated with aquatic center events. Mitigation: Construction:WaterRepalce Ground cover of area disturbed a. Install Low Flow Bathroom FaucetPM105%i. Percent Reduction 32%PM2.5 5% Soil Stabilizer 84%b. Install Low Flow Kitchen FaucetWater exposed area i. Percent Reduction 18%Frequency(per day)2 c. Install Low Flow Toilet CheckUnpaved road mitigationVehicle speed 15 d. Install Low flow ShowerPercent Reduction 20%Clean paved road % PM Reduction 9 e. Use Water Efficiency Irrigation System CheckPercent Reduction 6.10% Demo Haul Trip Calculation Conversion factors*0.046 ton/SF <<---CalEEMod Appendix A1.2641662 tons/cy <<---CalEEMod Appendix A20tons<<---CalEEMod User's Guide15.8 CY0.7910352 CY/ton *CalEEMod User's Guide Version 2011.1, Appendix A CALEEMOD OUTPUT CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Parking Lot 0.15 Acre 0.15 0.00 0 High School 1.20 1000sqft 0.03 1,200.00 0 High School 7.80 1000sqft 0.18 7,800.00 0 Population High School 18.30 1000sqft 0.42 18,300.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 2:47 PM Servite HS Construction Model Run 1 Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 7.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 24.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 8.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 7.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 130.00 Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Construction mitigation measures Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 Off-road Equipment - Equipment added for trenching Off-road Equipment - 1 Excavator assumed for trenching Trips and VMT - Water trucks added Demolition - 772+5539 Grading - Architectural Coating - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - aquatic center, music and weight room, parking lot Construction Phase - As provided by the client's architect Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 4.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 4.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,010.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,450.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 2,440.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/20/2015 3/19/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/4/2014 8/5/2014 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/28/2015 3/19/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/28/2015 3/22/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/30/2015 3/27/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/3/2014 9/3/2014 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/7/2015 3/27/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2015 4/1/2015 2.2 Overall Operational 0.0000 0.0791 0.0791 0.1406 0.0000 0.0792-86.0121 0.1105 -42.0385 -103.8245 0.1099 -19.1467 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0360 0.1012 0.0936 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 189.2489 189.2489 0.0355 0.0000 189.99500.2097 0.1175 0.3272 0.0506 0.1091 0.1597Total0.5551 1.9151 1.2492 2.0400e- 003 0.0000 43.2420 43.2420 0.0116 0.0000 43.48554.2700e- 003 0.0353 0.0396 1.1400e- 003 0.0325 0.033720150.3771 0.5112 0.3221 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 146.0069 146.0069 0.0239 0.0000 146.50950.2054 0.0822 0.2876 0.0495 0.0766 0.126120140.1780 1.4038 0.9271 1.5700e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 189.3987 189.3987 0.0356 0.0000 190.14560.1127 0.1176 0.2304 0.0248 0.1092 0.1341Total0.5553 1.9170 1.2504 2.0400e- 003 0.0000 43.2884 43.2884 0.0116 0.0000 43.53214.6300e- 003 0.0353 0.0400 1.2300e- 003 0.0326 0.033820150.3771 0.5118 0.3225 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 146.1103 146.1103 0.0240 0.0000 146.61350.1081 0.0823 0.1904 0.0236 0.0767 0.100320140.1782 1.4052 0.9279 1.5700e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 7.4917 560.3454 567.8372 0.4777 1.6400e- 003 578.37900.4442 8.3700e- 003 0.4525 0.1187 7.8000e- 003 0.1265Total0.8205 0.5524 2.3559 6.1500e- 003 0.2876 10.7886 11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 11.95490.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 7.2042 0.0000 7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 16.14500.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 477.4935 477.4935 0.0191 0.0000 477.89440.4442 7.1100e- 003 0.4513 0.1187 6.5400e- 003 0.1252Mobile0.6884 0.5358 2.3416 6.0500e- 003 0.0000 72.0627 72.0627 2.8300e- 003 8.4000e- 004 72.38401.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 Energy 1.8300e- 003 0.0166 0.0140 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.1303 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.9533e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 7.4917 560.3454 567.8372 0.4777 1.6400e- 003 578.37850.4442 8.3700e- 003 0.4525 0.1187 7.8000e- 003 0.1265Total0.8205 0.5524 2.3559 6.1500e- 003 0.2876 10.7886 11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 11.95450.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 7.2042 0.0000 7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 16.14500.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 477.4935 477.4935 0.0191 0.0000 477.89440.4442 7.1100e- 003 0.4513 0.1187 6.5400e- 003 0.1252Mobile0.6884 0.5358 2.3416 6.0500e- 003 0.0000 72.0627 72.0627 2.8300e- 003 8.4000e- 004 72.38401.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 Energy 1.8300e- 003 0.0166 0.0140 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.1303 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Trenching Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 8 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 9 Finishing/Landscaping Building Construction 3/22/2015 4/1/2015 5 7 8 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 3/19/2015 3/27/2015 5 7 7 Paving Paving 3/19/2015 3/27/2015 5 11 6 Building Construction Building Construction 9/19/2014 3/19/2015 5 130 5 Fine Grading Grading 9/4/2014 9/18/2014 5 22 4 Trenching Utilities Trenching 8/5/2014 9/3/2014 5 22 3 Rough Grading Grading 8/5/2014 9/3/2014 5 22 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/2/2014 8/4/2014 5 24 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 6/1/2014 7/1/2014 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date Finishing/Landscaping Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Finishing/Landscaping Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Finishing/Landscaping Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Architectural Coatings Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 125 0.42 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Finishing/Landscaping 5 11.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coatings 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 11.00 0.00 0.00 Fine Grading 4 10.00 4.00 305.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching Utilities 1 3.00 4.00 0.00 Rough Grading 4 10.00 4.00 431.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 4.00 0.00 Demolition 4 10.00 4.00 624.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 0.0000 23.5427 23.5427 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 23.54816.8300e- 003 2.1800e- 003 9.0200e- 003 1.8700e- 003 2.0100e- 003 3.8700e- 003 Total 0.0213 0.1228 0.0920 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.1695 1.1695 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.17081.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 Worker 2.3500e- 003 6.8000e- 004 7.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8838 0.8838 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88402.7000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 Vendor 9.3000e- 004 5.1700e- 003 5.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 21.4894 21.4894 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 21.49335.3500e- 003 2.0800e- 003 7.4300e- 003 1.4700e- 003 1.9100e- 003 3.3800e- 003 Hauling 0.0180 0.1169 0.0789 2.3000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 12.0472 12.0472 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.09990.0675 0.0102 0.0778 0.0102 9.7900e- 003 0.0200Total0.0164 0.1374 0.0974 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 12.0472 12.0472 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.09990.0102 0.0102 9.7900e- 003 9.7900e- 003 Off-Road 0.0164 0.1374 0.0974 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0675 0.0000 0.0675 0.0102 0.0000 0.0102Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 12 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3.2 Demolition - 2014 0.0000 23.5427 23.5427 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 23.54810.0836 2.1800e- 003 0.0857 0.0207 2.0100e- 003 0.0227Total0.0213 0.1228 0.0920 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.1695 1.1695 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.17081.1100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1200e- 003 3.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 Worker 2.3500e- 003 6.8000e- 004 7.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8838 0.8838 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88402.5000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 Vendor 9.3000e- 004 5.1700e- 003 5.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 21.4894 21.4894 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 21.49330.0822 2.0800e- 003 0.0843 0.0203 1.9100e- 003 0.0222Hauling0.0180 0.1169 0.0789 2.3000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 12.0328 12.0328 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.08550.0289 0.0102 0.0391 4.3700e- 003 9.7800e- 003 0.0142Total0.0164 0.1373 0.0973 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 12.0328 12.0328 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.08550.0102 0.0102 9.7800e- 003 9.7800e- 003 Off-Road 0.0164 0.1373 0.0973 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0289 0.0000 0.0289 4.3700e- 003 0.0000 4.3700e- 003 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1.6021 1.6021 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.60309.6000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.0600e- 003 2.5000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 Total 2.2900e- 003 6.0100e- 003 0.0104 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6379 0.6379 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63866.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 Worker 1.2800e- 003 3.7000e- 004 3.8700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9642 0.9642 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.96433.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 Vendor 1.0100e- 003 5.6400e- 003 6.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 10.8339 10.8339 3.2000e- 003 0.0000 10.90126.3600e- 003 0.0107 0.0171 6.9000e- 004 9.8500e- 003 0.0105Total0.0172 0.1738 0.0887 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 10.8339 10.8339 3.2000e- 003 0.0000 10.90120.0107 0.0107 9.8500e- 003 9.8500e- 003 Off-Road 0.0172 0.1738 0.0887 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00006.3600e- 003 0.0000 6.3600e- 003 6.9000e- 004 0.0000 6.9000e- 004 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1.6021 1.6021 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.60308.9000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 9.9000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 3.4000e- 004 Total 2.2900e- 003 6.0100e- 003 0.0104 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6379 0.6379 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63866.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 Worker 1.2800e- 003 3.7000e- 004 3.8700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9642 0.9642 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.96432.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Vendor 1.0100e- 003 5.6400e- 003 6.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 10.8210 10.8210 3.2000e- 003 0.0000 10.88822.7200e- 003 0.0107 0.0134 2.9000e- 004 9.8400e- 003 0.0101Total0.0172 0.1736 0.0886 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 10.8210 10.8210 3.2000e- 003 0.0000 10.88820.0107 0.0107 9.8400e- 003 9.8400e- 003 Off-Road 0.0172 0.1736 0.0886 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00002.7200e- 003 0.0000 2.7200e- 003 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.9000e- 004 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 16.8962 16.8962 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 16.90035.1700e- 003 1.5400e- 003 6.7200e- 003 1.4100e- 003 1.4200e- 003 2.8200e- 003 Total 0.0157 0.0866 0.0676 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.1695 1.1695 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.17081.2100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 Worker 2.3500e- 003 6.8000e- 004 7.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8838 0.8838 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88402.7000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 Vendor 9.3000e- 004 5.1700e- 003 5.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 14.8429 14.8429 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 14.84563.6900e- 003 1.4400e- 003 5.1300e- 003 1.0100e- 003 1.3200e- 003 2.3300e- 003 Hauling 0.0124 0.0808 0.0545 1.6000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 12.0472 12.0472 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.09998.4800e- 003 0.0102 0.0187 4.5800e- 003 9.7900e- 003 0.0144Total0.0164 0.1374 0.0974 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 12.0472 12.0472 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.09990.0102 0.0102 9.7900e- 003 9.7900e- 003 Off-Road 0.0164 0.1374 0.0974 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00008.4800e- 003 0.0000 8.4800e- 003 4.5800e- 003 0.0000 4.5800e- 003 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 16.8962 16.8962 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 16.90030.0581 1.5400e- 003 0.0597 0.0144 1.4200e- 003 0.0158Total0.0157 0.0866 0.0676 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.1695 1.1695 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.17081.1100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.1200e- 003 3.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 004 Worker 2.3500e- 003 6.8000e- 004 7.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8838 0.8838 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88402.5000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 Vendor 9.3000e- 004 5.1700e- 003 5.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 14.8429 14.8429 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 14.84560.0568 1.4400e- 003 0.0582 0.0140 1.3200e- 003 0.0154Hauling0.0124 0.0808 0.0545 1.6000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 12.0328 12.0328 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.08553.6200e- 003 0.0102 0.0138 1.9600e- 003 9.7800e- 003 0.0117Total0.0164 0.1373 0.0973 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 12.0328 12.0328 2.5100e- 003 0.0000 12.08550.0102 0.0102 9.7800e- 003 9.7800e- 003 Off-Road 0.0164 0.1373 0.0973 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00003.6200e- 003 0.0000 3.6200e- 003 1.9600e- 003 0.0000 1.9600e- 003 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.2347 1.2347 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.23526.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 7.4000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 Total 1.6300e- 003 5.3800e- 003 8.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3509 0.3509 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.35123.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 Worker 7.0000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.8838 0.8838 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88402.7000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 Vendor 9.3000e- 004 5.1700e- 003 5.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.6005 5.6005 1.6500e- 003 0.0000 5.63522.7300e- 003 2.7300e- 003 2.5200e- 003 2.5200e- 003 Total 4.6600e- 003 0.0556 0.0377 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.6005 5.6005 1.6500e- 003 0.0000 5.63522.7300e- 003 2.7300e- 003 2.5200e- 003 2.5200e- 003 Off-Road 4.6600e- 003 0.0556 0.0377 6.0000e- 005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Trenching Utilities - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1.2347 1.2347 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.23525.8000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 6.9000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 Total 1.6300e- 003 5.3800e- 003 8.0700e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3509 0.3509 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.35123.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.4000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 Worker 7.0000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.8838 0.8838 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88402.5000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 Vendor 9.3000e- 004 5.1700e- 003 5.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.5938 5.5938 1.6500e- 003 0.0000 5.62852.7300e- 003 2.7300e- 003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 Total 4.6500e- 003 0.0556 0.0376 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.5938 5.5938 1.6500e- 003 0.0000 5.62852.7300e- 003 2.7300e- 003 2.5100e- 003 2.5100e- 003 Off-Road 4.6500e- 003 0.0556 0.0376 6.0000e- 005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 11.5303 11.5303 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 11.53303.3500e- 003 1.0700e- 003 4.4200e- 003 9.2000e- 004 9.7000e- 004 1.8900e- 003 Total 0.0104 0.0601 0.0451 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5847 0.5847 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.58546.0000e- 004 0.0000 6.1000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 Worker 1.1700e- 003 3.4000e- 004 3.5500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4419 0.4419 0.0000 0.0000 0.44201.4000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.8000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 Vendor 4.7000e- 004 2.5800e- 003 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 10.5037 10.5037 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 10.50562.6100e- 003 1.0200e- 003 3.6300e- 003 7.2000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 1.6500e- 003 Hauling 8.7900e- 003 0.0572 0.0386 1.1000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 6.0236 6.0236 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 6.04994.3400e- 003 5.1200e- 003 9.4600e- 003 2.3100e- 003 4.9000e- 003 7.2100e- 003 Total 8.2100e- 003 0.0687 0.0487 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0236 6.0236 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 6.04995.1200e- 003 5.1200e- 003 4.9000e- 003 4.9000e- 003 Off-Road 8.2100e- 003 0.0687 0.0487 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00004.3400e- 003 0.0000 4.3400e- 003 2.3100e- 003 0.0000 2.3100e- 003 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Fine Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 11.5303 11.5303 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 11.53300.0211 1.0700e- 003 0.0222 5.2700e- 003 9.7000e- 004 6.2500e- 003 Total 0.0104 0.0601 0.0451 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.5847 0.5847 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.58545.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.6000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 Worker 1.1700e- 003 3.4000e- 004 3.5500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4419 0.4419 0.0000 0.0000 0.44201.3000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 Vendor 4.7000e- 004 2.5800e- 003 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 10.5037 10.5037 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 10.50560.0204 1.0200e- 003 0.0214 5.0800e- 003 9.3000e- 004 6.0200e- 003 Hauling 8.7900e- 003 0.0572 0.0386 1.1000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 6.0164 6.0164 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 6.04271.8500e- 003 5.1100e- 003 6.9600e- 003 9.9000e- 004 4.8900e- 003 5.8800e- 003 Total 8.2000e- 003 0.0686 0.0486 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0164 6.0164 1.2500e- 003 0.0000 6.04275.1100e- 003 5.1100e- 003 4.8900e- 003 4.8900e- 003 Off-Road 8.2000e- 003 0.0686 0.0486 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00001.8500e- 003 0.0000 1.8500e- 003 9.9000e- 004 0.0000 9.9000e- 004 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 4.3271 4.3271 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.33204.4700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 003 1.1900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 Total 8.6900e- 003 2.5300e- 003 0.0263 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.3271 4.3271 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.33204.4700e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 003 1.1900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.2200e- 003 Worker 8.6900e- 003 2.5300e- 003 0.0263 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 40.4250 40.4250 0.0120 0.0000 40.67590.0382 0.0382 0.0352 0.0352Total0.0552 0.5488 0.3087 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 40.4250 40.4250 0.0120 0.0000 40.67590.0382 0.0382 0.0352 0.0352Off-Road 0.0552 0.5488 0.3087 4.2000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 40,950; Non-Residential Outdoor: 13,650 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 4.3271 4.3271 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.33204.1200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.1500e- 003 1.1000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 Total 8.6900e- 003 2.5300e- 003 0.0263 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.3271 4.3271 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 4.33204.1200e- 003 4.0000e- 005 4.1500e- 003 1.1000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.1300e- 003 Worker 8.6900e- 003 2.5300e- 003 0.0263 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 40.3769 40.3769 0.0119 0.0000 40.62750.0382 0.0382 0.0351 0.0351Total0.0552 0.5482 0.3083 4.2000e- 004 0.0000 40.3769 40.3769 0.0119 0.0000 40.62750.0382 0.0382 0.0351 0.0351Off-Road 0.0552 0.5482 0.3083 4.2000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 3.1585 3.1585 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.16193.3800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4100e- 003 9.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.2000e- 004 Total 6.1400e- 003 1.7200e- 003 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1585 3.1585 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.16193.3800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.4100e- 003 9.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 9.2000e- 004 Worker 6.1400e- 003 1.7200e- 003 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 30.2706 30.2706 9.0400e- 003 0.0000 30.46040.0280 0.0280 0.0258 0.0258Total0.0407 0.4026 0.2324 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 30.2706 30.2706 9.0400e- 003 0.0000 30.46040.0280 0.0280 0.0258 0.0258Off-Road 0.0407 0.4026 0.2324 3.2000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 3.1585 3.1585 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.16193.1200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1400e- 003 8.3000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.6000e- 004 Total 6.1400e- 003 1.7200e- 003 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.1585 3.1585 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.16193.1200e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1400e- 003 8.3000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.6000e- 004 Worker 6.1400e- 003 1.7200e- 003 0.0179 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 30.2346 30.2346 9.0300e- 003 0.0000 30.42420.0280 0.0280 0.0257 0.0257Total0.0407 0.4021 0.2321 3.2000e- 004 0.0000 30.2346 30.2346 9.0300e- 003 0.0000 30.42420.0280 0.0280 0.0257 0.0257Off-Road 0.0407 0.4021 0.2321 3.2000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.6461 0.6461 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.64686.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 Total 1.2600e- 003 3.5000e- 004 3.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6461 0.6461 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.64686.9000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.9000e- 004 Worker 1.2600e- 003 3.5000e- 004 3.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3.4722 3.4722 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 3.49202.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.3500e- 003 2.3500e- 003 Total 4.4300e- 003 0.0404 0.0258 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving2.0000e- 004 0.0000 3.4722 3.4722 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 3.49202.5400e- 003 2.5400e- 003 2.3500e- 003 2.3500e- 003 Off-Road 4.2300e- 003 0.0404 0.0258 4.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Paving - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.6461 0.6461 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.64686.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 Total 1.2600e- 003 3.5000e- 004 3.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6461 0.6461 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.64686.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.4000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 Worker 1.2600e- 003 3.5000e- 004 3.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3.4680 3.4680 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 3.48782.5300e- 003 2.5300e- 003 2.3400e- 003 2.3400e- 003 Total 4.4300e- 003 0.0404 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving2.0000e- 004 0.0000 3.4680 3.4680 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 3.48782.5300e- 003 2.5300e- 003 2.3400e- 003 2.3400e- 003 Off-Road 4.2300e- 003 0.0404 0.0257 4.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0718 0.0718 0.0000 0.0000 0.07198.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Total 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0718 0.0718 0.0000 0.0000 0.07198.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Worker 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.8936 0.8936 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.89617.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 Total 0.3178 9.0000e- 003 6.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8936 0.8936 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.89617.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 Off-Road 1.4200e- 003 9.0000e- 003 6.6600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.3163 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0718 0.0718 0.0000 0.0000 0.07197.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Total 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0718 0.0718 0.0000 0.0000 0.07197.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 Worker 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.8926 0.8926 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.89507.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 Total 0.3178 8.9900e- 003 6.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8926 0.8926 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.89507.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 7.7000e- 004 Off-Road 1.4200e- 003 8.9900e- 003 6.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.3163 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.4512 0.4512 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.45174.8000e- 004 0.0000 4.9000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 Total 8.8000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4512 0.4512 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.45174.8000e- 004 0.0000 4.9000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.3000e- 004 Worker 8.8000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 4.3244 4.3244 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.35154.0000e- 003 4.0000e- 003 3.6800e- 003 3.6800e- 003 Total 5.8200e- 003 0.0575 0.0332 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.3244 4.3244 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.35154.0000e- 003 4.0000e- 003 3.6800e- 003 3.6800e- 003 Off-Road 5.8200e- 003 0.0575 0.0332 5.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.10 Finishing/Landscaping - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.4512 0.4512 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.45174.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 Total 8.8000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.4512 0.4512 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.45174.5000e- 004 0.0000 4.5000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 1.2000e- 004 Worker 8.8000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 2.5600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 4.3192 4.3192 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.34633.9900e- 003 3.9900e- 003 3.6700e- 003 3.6700e- 003 Total 5.8100e- 003 0.0574 0.0332 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.3192 4.3192 1.2900e- 003 0.0000 4.34633.9900e- 003 3.9900e- 003 3.6700e- 003 3.6700e- 003 Off-Road 5.8100e- 003 0.0574 0.0332 5.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.002141 0.004713 0.000509 0.002239 MH 0.511008 0.057223 0.191597 0.152361 0.041328 0.005882 0.015289 0.014281 0.001428 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUSLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 351.90 119.30 48.87 1,176,084 1,176,084 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 High School 15.47 5.24 2.15 51,696 51,696 High School 100.54 34.09 13.96 336,024 336,024 Annual VMT High School 235.89 79.97 32.76 788,364 788,364 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.0000 477.4935 477.4935 0.0191 0.0000 477.89440.4442 7.1100e- 003 0.4513 0.1187 6.5400e- 003 0.1252Unmitigated0.6884 0.5358 2.3416 6.0500e- 003 0.0000 477.4935 477.4935 0.0191 0.0000 477.89440.4442 7.1100e- 003 0.4513 0.1187 6.5400e- 003 0.1252Mitigated0.6884 0.5358 2.3416 6.0500e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 18.0793 18.0793 3.5000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 18.18931.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 NaturalGas Unmitigated 1.8300e- 003 0.0166 0.0140 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 18.0793 18.0793 3.5000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 18.18931.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 1.2600e- 003 NaturalGas Mitigated 1.8300e- 003 0.0166 0.0140 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 53.9834 53.9834 2.4800e- 003 5.1000e- 004 54.19470.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 53.9834 53.9834 2.4800e- 003 5.1000e- 004 54.19470.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity Mitigated NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 18.18931.2700e- 003 0.0000 18.0793 18.0793 3.5000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 5.1655 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 5.1970 Total 1.8200e- 003 0.0166 0.0140 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.1655 12.1928 High School 96798 5.2000e- 004 4.7500e- 003 3.9900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 12.1191 12.1191 2.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 0.7947 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.7995 High School 227103 1.2200e- 003 0.0111 9.3500e- 003 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7947 0.0000 High School 14892 8.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 18.1893 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 1.2700e- 003 0.0000 18.0793 18.0793 3.5000e- 004 3.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 1.2700e- 003 12.1191 2.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 12.1928 Total 1.8200e- 003 0.0166 0.0140 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 12.1191 0.7995 High School 227103 1.2200e- 003 0.0111 9.3500e- 003 7.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7947 0.7947 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 High School 14892 8.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.1970 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 5.1655 5.1655 1.0000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 High School 96798 5.2000e- 004 4.7500e- 003 3.9900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 54.1946Total53.9834 2.4800e- 003 5.1000e- 004 2.3822 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 High School 8292 2.3729 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 36.3283 High School 53898 15.4238 7.1000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 15.4842 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr High School 126453 36.1867 1.6600e- 003 3.4000e- 004 54.1946 Mitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Total 53.9834 2.4800e- 003 5.1000e- 004 2.3822 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 High School 8292 2.3729 1.1000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 36.3283 High School 53898 15.4238 7.1000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 15.4842 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr High School 126453 36.1867 1.6600e- 003 3.4000e- 004 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.1303 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0987 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0316 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.1303 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.1303 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Unmitigated 11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 11.9549 Category t o n MT/yr Mitigated 11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 11.9545 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.1303 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 6.8000e- 004 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 7.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0987 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0316 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 11.9545Total11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 11.9545 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr High School 0.906487 / 2.33097 11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 11.9549 Mitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Total 11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 11.9549 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr High School 0.906487 / 2.33097 11.0762 0.0300 8.0000e- 004 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 16.1450Total7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 16.1450 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr High School 35.49 7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 16.1450 t o n MT/yr Mitigated 7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 16.1450 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 16.1450 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Total 7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 16.1450 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr High School 35.49 7.2042 0.4258 0.0000 Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Parking Lot 0.15 Acre 0.15 0.00 0 High School 1.20 1000sqft 0.03 1,200.00 0 High School 7.80 1000sqft 0.18 7,800.00 0 Population High School 18.30 1000sqft 0.42 18,300.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 2:46 PM Servite HS Construction Model Run 1 Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Construction mitigation measures Off-road Equipment - Equipment added for trenching Off-road Equipment - 1 Excavator assumed for trenching Trips and VMT - Water trucks added Demolition - 772+5539 Grading - Architectural Coating - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - aquatic center, music and weight room, parking lot Construction Phase - As provided by the client's architect Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 4.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 4.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,010.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,450.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 2,440.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/20/2015 3/19/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/4/2014 8/5/2014 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/28/2015 3/19/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/28/2015 3/22/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/30/2015 3/27/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/3/2014 9/3/2014 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/7/2015 3/27/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2015 4/1/2015 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 7.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 24.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 8.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 7.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 130.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 0.0000 0.0610 0.0610 0.0880 0.0000 0.0611-50.3191 0.0873 -35.1065 -101.3450 0.0873 -29.5893 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 4.6858e- 003 0.0780 0.0720 0.0616 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 6,520.805 7 6,520.805 7 1.1462 0.0000 6,544.874 8 10.6964 3.2722 13.7698 2.4027 3.0660 5.2858Total97.5240 54.0973 38.0027 0.0649 0.0000 2,928.844 6 2,928.844 6 0.7067 0.0000 2,943.684 4 0.3194 1.9458 2.2651 0.0852 1.8114 1.8966201594.0896 28.6182 19.4136 0.0296 0.0000 3,591.961 1 3,591.961 1 0.4395 0.0000 3,601.190 4 10.3771 1.3264 11.5047 2.3175 1.2546 3.389220143.4344 25.4791 18.5891 0.0353 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 6,524.783 0 6,524.783 0 1.1472 0.0000 6,548.873 4 7.1158 3.2750 10.1918 1.1933 3.0687 4.0789Total97.5285 54.1395 38.0300 0.0650 0.0000 2,931.199 4 2,931.199 4 0.7073 0.0000 2,946.052 5 0.3465 1.9475 2.2940 0.0919 1.8131 1.9049201594.0924 28.6443 19.4297 0.0296 0.0000 3,593.583 6 3,593.583 6 0.4399 0.0000 3,602.821 0 6.7693 1.3275 7.8978 1.1014 1.2556 2.174020143.4362 25.4952 18.6003 0.0353 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 3.0 Construction Detail 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 3,931.449 9 3,931.449 9 0.1500 2.0000e- 003 3,935.221 4 3.1748 0.0568 3.2316 0.8470 0.0528 0.8998Total5.3337 3.5768 16.7582 0.0445 3,822.243 9 3,822.243 9 0.1479 3,825.350 5 3.1748 0.0499 3.2246 0.8470 0.0459 0.8929Mobile4.6095 3.4857 16.6789 0.0440 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.86466.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 Energy 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Area 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,931.449 9 3,931.449 9 0.1500 2.0000e- 003 3,935.221 4 3.1748 0.0568 3.2316 0.8470 0.0528 0.8998Total5.3337 3.5768 16.7582 0.0445 3,822.243 9 3,822.243 9 0.1479 3,825.350 5 3.1748 0.0499 3.2246 0.8470 0.0459 0.8929Mobile4.6095 3.4857 16.6789 0.0440 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.86466.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 Energy 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Area 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 89Finishing/Landscaping Building Construction 3/22/2015 4/1/2015 5 7 8 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 3/19/2015 3/27/2015 5 7 7 Paving Paving 3/19/2015 3/27/2015 5 11 6 Building Construction Building Construction 9/19/2014 3/19/2015 5 130 5 Fine Grading Grading 9/4/2014 9/18/2014 5 22 4 Trenching Utilities Trenching 8/5/2014 9/3/2014 5 22 3 Rough Grading Grading 8/5/2014 9/3/2014 5 22 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/2/2014 8/4/2014 5 24 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 6/1/2014 7/1/2014 5 Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date Finishing/Landscaping Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Finishing/Landscaping Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Finishing/Landscaping Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Architectural Coatings Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 125 0.42 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Trenching Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Finishing/Landscaping 5 11.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coatings 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 5 11.00 0.00 0.00 Fine Grading 4 10.00 4.00 305.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching Utilities 1 3.00 4.00 0.00 Rough Grading 4 10.00 4.00 431.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 4.00 0.00 Demolition 4 10.00 4.00 624.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 2,366.383 0 2,366.383 0 0.0256 2,366.920 0 0.6307 0.1981 0.8288 0.1720 0.1822 0.3542Total1.8693 10.6045 7.6642 0.0232 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0250 8.5700e- 003 0.0336 7.1100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0150Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 2,155.602 2 2,155.602 2 0.0185 2,155.990 0 0.4940 0.1886 0.6826 0.1352 0.1735 0.3087Hauling1.5867 10.0999 6.5208 0.0210 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 6.1386 0.9304 7.0690 0.9294 0.8904 1.8198Total1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.0000 0.00006.1386 0.0000 6.1386 0.9294 0.0000 0.9294Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 12 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3.2 Demolition - 2014 2,366.383 0 2,366.383 0 0.0256 2,366.920 0 7.7528 0.1981 7.9509 1.9202 0.1822 2.1023Total1.8693 10.6045 7.6642 0.0232 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1030 8.7000e- 004 0.1039 0.0275 7.9000e- 004 0.0283Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0233 8.5700e- 003 0.0319 6.7100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0146Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 2,155.602 2 2,155.602 2 0.0185 2,155.990 0 7.6264 0.1886 7.8151 1.8859 0.1735 2.0594Hauling1.5867 10.0999 6.5208 0.0210 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 2.6243 0.9296 3.5538 0.3973 0.8895 1.2869Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 0.00002.6243 0.0000 2.6243 0.3973 0.0000 0.3973Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 149.8289 149.8289 3.9400e- 003 149.91170.0809 9.0000e- 003 0.0899 0.0219 8.2800e- 003 0.0302Total0.1816 0.4771 0.8091 1.5500e- 003 60.9519 60.9519 3.1600e- 003 61.01830.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152Worker0.1010 0.0276 0.3343 6.8000e- 004 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0250 8.5700e- 003 0.0336 7.1100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0150Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 995.1971 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.373 0 0.5303 0.8920 1.4223 0.0573 0.8206 0.8779Total1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 995.1971 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.373 0 0.8920 0.8920 0.8206 0.8206Off-Road 1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 149.8289 149.8289 3.9400e- 003 149.91170.0749 9.0000e- 003 0.0839 0.0205 8.2800e- 003 0.0287Total0.1816 0.4771 0.8091 1.5500e- 003 60.9519 60.9519 3.1600e- 003 61.01830.0515 4.3000e- 004 0.0520 0.0138 4.0000e- 004 0.0142Worker0.1010 0.0276 0.3343 6.8000e- 004 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0233 8.5700e- 003 0.0319 6.7100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0146Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 994.2841 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.454 3 0.2267 0.8912 1.1179 0.0245 0.8199 0.8444Total1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 0.0000 994.2841 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.454 3 0.8912 0.8912 0.8199 0.8199Off-Road 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.2267 0.0000 0.2267 0.0245 0.0000 0.0245Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,699.666 3 1,699.666 3 0.0199 1,700.083 3 0.4779 0.1397 0.6177 0.1302 0.1285 0.2587Total1.3786 7.4807 5.6474 0.0167 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0250 8.5700e- 003 0.0336 7.1100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0150Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 1,488.885 5 1,488.885 5 0.0128 1,489.153 4 0.3412 0.1303 0.4715 0.0934 0.1198 0.2133Hauling1.0959 6.9761 4.5039 0.0145 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 0.7705 0.9304 1.7009 0.4165 0.8904 1.3068Total1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.0000 0.00000.7705 0.0000 0.7705 0.4165 0.0000 0.4165Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,699.666 3 1,699.666 3 0.0199 1,700.083 3 5.3940 0.1397 5.5337 1.3368 0.1285 1.4654Total1.3786 7.4807 5.6474 0.0167 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1030 8.7000e- 004 0.1039 0.0275 7.9000e- 004 0.0283Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0233 8.5700e- 003 0.0319 6.7100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0146Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 1,488.885 5 1,488.885 5 0.0128 1,489.153 4 5.2676 0.1303 5.3979 1.3026 0.1198 1.4225Hauling1.0959 6.9761 4.5039 0.0145 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 0.3294 0.9296 1.2590 0.1780 0.8895 1.0676Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3294 0.0000 0.3294 0.1780 0.0000 0.1780Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 125.4481 125.4481 2.6800e- 003 125.50430.0585 8.8300e- 003 0.0674 0.0160 8.1200e- 003 0.0241Total0.1412 0.4661 0.6754 1.2800e- 003 36.5712 36.5712 1.9000e- 003 36.61100.0335 2.6000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.4000e- 004 9.1300e- 003 Worker 0.0606 0.0165 0.2006 4.1000e- 004 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0250 8.5700e- 003 0.0336 7.1100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0150Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 561.2224 561.2224 0.1659 564.70520.2485 0.2485 0.2286 0.2286Total0.4235 5.0563 3.4248 5.2900e- 003 561.2224 561.2224 0.1659 564.70520.2485 0.2485 0.2286 0.2286Off-Road 0.4235 5.0563 3.4248 5.2900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Trenching Utilities - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 125.4481 125.4481 2.6800e- 003 125.50430.0543 8.8300e- 003 0.0631 0.0150 8.1200e- 003 0.0231Total0.1412 0.4661 0.6754 1.2800e- 003 36.5712 36.5712 1.9000e- 003 36.61100.0309 2.6000e- 004 0.0312 8.2500e- 003 2.4000e- 004 8.4900e- 003 Worker 0.0606 0.0165 0.2006 4.1000e- 004 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0233 8.5700e- 003 0.0319 6.7100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0146Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 560.7075 560.7075 0.1657 564.18710.2483 0.2483 0.2284 0.2284Total0.4231 5.0516 3.4217 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 560.7075 560.7075 0.1657 564.18710.2483 0.2483 0.2284 0.2284Off-Road 0.4231 5.0516 3.4217 5.2900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 2,318.020 1 2,318.020 1 0.0252 2,318.548 4 0.6196 0.1939 0.8135 0.1690 0.1783 0.3473Total1.8337 10.3779 7.5179 0.0227 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0250 8.5700e- 003 0.0336 7.1100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0150Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 2,107.239 3 2,107.239 3 0.0181 2,107.618 5 0.4829 0.1844 0.6673 0.1322 0.1696 0.3018Hauling1.5511 9.8733 6.3745 0.0205 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 0.7882 0.9304 1.7186 0.4192 0.8904 1.3095Total1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.0000 0.00000.7882 0.0000 0.7882 0.4192 0.0000 0.4192Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Fine Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 2,318.020 1 2,318.020 1 0.0252 2,318.548 4 3.9122 0.1939 4.1060 0.9771 0.1783 1.1554Total1.8337 10.3779 7.5179 0.0227 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1030 8.7000e- 004 0.1039 0.0275 7.9000e- 004 0.0283Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 88.8770 88.8770 7.8000e- 004 88.89340.0233 8.5700e- 003 0.0319 6.7100e- 003 7.8800e- 003 0.0146Vendor0.0806 0.4495 0.4748 8.7000e- 004 2,107.239 3 2,107.239 3 0.0181 2,107.618 5 3.7858 0.1844 3.9702 0.9429 0.1696 1.1125Hauling1.5511 9.8733 6.3745 0.0205 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 0.3370 0.9296 1.2665 0.1792 0.8895 1.0687Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3370 0.0000 0.3370 0.1792 0.0000 0.1792Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 134.0942 134.0942 6.9500e- 003 134.24030.1230 9.5000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.7000e- 004 0.0335Total0.2222 0.0606 0.7355 1.5000e- 003 134.0942 134.0942 6.9500e- 003 134.24030.1230 9.5000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.7000e- 004 0.0335Worker0.2222 0.0606 0.7355 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,204.349 7 1,204.349 7 0.3559 1,211.823 5 1.0334 1.0334 0.9507 0.9507Total1.4930 14.8331 8.3419 0.0113 1,204.349 7 1,204.349 7 0.3559 1,211.823 5 1.0334 1.0334 0.9507 0.9507Off-Road 1.4930 14.8331 8.3419 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 40,950; Non-Residential Outdoor: 13,650 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 134.0942 134.0942 6.9500e- 003 134.24030.1133 9.5000e- 004 0.1143 0.0303 8.7000e- 004 0.0311Total0.2222 0.0606 0.7355 1.5000e- 003 134.0942 134.0942 6.9500e- 003 134.24030.1133 9.5000e- 004 0.1143 0.0303 8.7000e- 004 0.0311Worker0.2222 0.0606 0.7355 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,203.244 7 1,203.244 7 0.3556 1,210.711 7 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499Total1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 0.0000 1,203.244 7 1,203.244 7 0.3556 1,210.711 7 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499Off-Road 1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334Total0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334Worker0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Total1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Off-Road 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311Total0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311Worker0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Off-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 211.6486 211.6486 0.0104 211.86700.2012 1.4600e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3400e- 003 0.0547Total0.3392 0.0892 1.0865 2.4400e- 003 211.6486 211.6486 0.0104 211.86700.2012 1.4600e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3400e- 003 0.0547Worker0.3392 0.0892 1.0865 2.4400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,093.543 3 1,093.543 3 0.2970 1,099.779 4 0.7247 0.7247 0.6703 0.6703Total1.2654 11.5427 7.3586 0.0111 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving0.0561 1,093.543 3 1,093.543 3 0.2970 1,099.779 4 0.7247 0.7247 0.6703 0.6703Off-Road 1.2092 11.5427 7.3586 0.0111 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Paving - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 211.6486 211.6486 0.0104 211.86700.1855 1.4600e- 003 0.1869 0.0495 1.3400e- 003 0.0508Total0.3392 0.0892 1.0865 2.4400e- 003 211.6486 211.6486 0.0104 211.86700.1855 1.4600e- 003 0.1869 0.0495 1.3400e- 003 0.0508Worker0.3392 0.0892 1.0865 2.4400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,092.540 1 1,092.540 1 0.2967 1,098.770 5 0.7240 0.7240 0.6697 0.6697Total1.2643 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving0.0561 0.0000 1,092.540 1 1,092.540 1 0.2967 1,098.770 5 0.7240 0.7240 0.6697 0.6697Off-Road 1.2081 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 23.5165 23.5165 1.1600e- 003 23.54080.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.5000e- 004 6.0800e- 003 Total 0.0377 9.9100e- 003 0.1207 2.7000e- 004 23.5165 23.5165 1.1600e- 003 23.54080.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.5000e- 004 6.0800e- 003 Worker 0.0377 9.9100e- 003 0.1207 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.21770.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209Total90.7891 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.21770.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209Off-Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 90.3825 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 23.5165 23.5165 1.1600e- 003 23.54080.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.6500e- 003 Total 0.0377 9.9100e- 003 0.1207 2.7000e- 004 23.5165 23.5165 1.1600e- 003 23.54080.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.6500e- 003 Worker 0.0377 9.9100e- 003 0.1207 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0366 281.95870.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207Total90.7887 2.5680 1.9000 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0366 281.95870.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207Off-Road 0.4062 2.5680 1.9000 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 90.3825 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334Total0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334Worker0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Total1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Off-Road 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.10 Finishing/Landscaping - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311Total0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 129.3408 129.3408 6.3500e- 003 129.47430.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311Worker0.2073 0.0545 0.6639 1.4900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Off-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 351.90 119.30 48.87 1,176,084 1,176,084 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 High School 15.47 5.24 2.15 51,696 51,696 High School 100.54 34.09 13.96 336,024 336,024 Annual VMT High School 235.89 79.97 32.76 788,364 788,364 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 3,822.243 9 3,822.243 9 0.1479 3,825.350 5 3.1748 0.0499 3.2246 0.8470 0.0459 0.8929Unmitigated4.6095 3.4857 16.6789 0.0440 3,822.243 9 3,822.243 9 0.1479 3,825.350 5 3.1748 0.0499 3.2246 0.8470 0.0459 0.8929Mitigated4.6095 3.4857 16.6789 0.0440 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.86466.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.86466.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.002141 0.004713 0.000509 0.002239 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N MH 0.511008 0.057223 0.191597 0.152361 0.041328 0.005882 0.015289 0.014281 0.001428 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUSLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2 4.4 Fleet Mix 109.86466.9200e- 003 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 5.5000e- 004 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 73.2000 1.4000e- 003 1.3400e- 003 73.6455 Total 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 73.2000 31.3899 High School 0.6222 6.7100e- 003 0.0610 0.0512 3.7000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 1.9800e- 003 31.2000 31.2000 6.0000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 4.8000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 4.8292 High School 0.2652 2.8600e- 003 0.0260 0.0218 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 4.8000 0.0000 High School 0.0408 4.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 003 3.3600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 109.8646 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 6.9200e- 003 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 5.5000e- 004 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 31.2000 6.0000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 31.3899 Total 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 31.2000 0.0000 High School 265.2 2.8600e- 003 0.0260 0.0218 1.6000e- 004 1.9800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 73.2000 1.4000e- 003 1.3400e- 003 73.6455 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 73.2000 4.8292 High School 622.2 6.7100e- 003 0.0610 0.0512 3.7000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 3.0000e- 004 4.8000 4.8000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 High School 40.8 4.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 003 3.3600e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Total 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Landscaping 2.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.5405 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.1733 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Unmitigated 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Mitigated 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Total 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 Landscaping 2.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.5405 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.1733 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 2:45 PM Servite HS Construction Model Run 1 Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population High School 18.30 1000sqft 0.42 18,300.00 0 High School 7.80 1000sqft 0.18 7,800.00 0 High School 1.20 1000sqft 0.03 1,200.00 0 Parking Lot 0.15 Acre 0.15 0.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - aquatic center, music and weight room, parking lot Construction Phase - As provided by the client's architect Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Equipment added for trenching Off-road Equipment - 1 Excavator assumed for trenching Trips and VMT - Water trucks added Demolition - 772+5539 Grading - Architectural Coating - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Construction mitigation measures Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 7.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 130.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 8.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 22.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 11.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 5.00 7.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 24.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/7/2015 3/27/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2015 4/1/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 3/30/2015 3/27/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 10/3/2014 9/3/2014 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/28/2015 3/19/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/28/2015 3/22/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 3/20/2015 3/19/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 9/4/2014 8/5/2014 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 3,450.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 2,440.00 tblGrading MaterialImported 0.00 1,010.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 6,534.00 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 4.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 4.00 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 2014 3.5968 25.7653 19.3104 0.0352 6.7693 1.3282 7.8986 1.1014 1.2563 2.1747 0.0000 3,580.202 5 3,580.202 5 0.4401 0.0000 3,589.443 7 2015 94.2168 28.6597 19.3260 0.0294 0.3465 1.9475 2.2940 0.0919 1.8131 1.9049 0.0000 2,911.920 7 2,911.920 7 0.7073 0.0000 2,926.773 8 Total 97.8136 54.4250 38.6364 0.0646 1.1474 0.0000 6,516.217 5 7.1158 3.2757 10.1926 1.1933 3.0693 4.0796 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 6,492.123 2 6,492.123 2 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2014 3.5951 25.7492 19.2991 0.0352 10.3771 1.3271 11.5055 2.3175 1.2552 3.3899 0.0000 3,578.580 0 3,578.580 0 0.4397 0.0000 3,587.813 2 2015 94.2140 28.6335 19.3099 0.0294 0.3194 1.9458 2.2651 0.0852 1.8114 1.8966 0.0000 2,909.565 9 2,909.565 9 0.7067 0.0000 2,924.405 7 Total 97.8091 54.3827 38.6090 0.0646 10.6964 3.2729 13.7706 2.4027 3.0666 5.2865 0.0000 6,488.146 0 6,488.146 0 1.1463 0.0000 6,512.218 9 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 4.6722e- 003 0.0776 0.0708 0.0619 0.0880 0.0000 0.0614-50.3191 0.0873 -35.1038 -101.3450 0.0873 -29.5841 0.0000 0.0613 0.0613 2.2 Overall Operational SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Area 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 Energy 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.8646 Mobile 5.4202 3.6880 16.2732 0.0420 3.1748 0.0500 3.2248 0.8470 0.0460 0.8931 3,654.021 9 3,654.021 9 0.1480 3,657.129 5 Total 6.1444 3.7790 16.3525 0.0425 0.1501 2.0000e- 003 3,767.000 5 3.1748 0.0570 3.2317 0.8470 0.0530 0.9000 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,763.227 9 3,763.227 9 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Area 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 Energy 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.8646 Mobile 5.4202 3.6880 16.2732 0.0420 3.1748 0.0500 3.2248 0.8470 0.0460 0.8931 3,654.021 9 3,654.021 9 0.1480 3,657.129 5 Total 6.1444 3.7790 16.3525 0.0425 3.1748 0.0570 3.2317 0.8470 0.0530 0.9000 3,763.227 9 3,763.227 9 0.1501 2.0000e- 003 3,767.000 5 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 6/1/2014 7/1/2014 5 22 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/2/2014 8/4/2014 5 24 3 Rough Grading Grading 8/5/2014 9/3/2014 5 22 4 Trenching Utilities Trenching 8/5/2014 9/3/2014 5 22 5 Fine Grading Grading 9/4/2014 9/18/2014 5 5 11 6 Building Construction Building Construction 9/19/2014 3/19/2015 5 130 8 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 3/19/2015 3/27/2015 5 7 7 Finishing/Landscaping Building Construction 3/22/2015 4/1/2015 5 7PavingPaving3/19/2015 3/27/2015 89 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Trenching Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 4 6.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 7.00 125 0.42 Paving Rollers 1 7.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 7.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coatings Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Finishing/Landscaping Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Finishing/Landscaping Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Finishing/Landscaping Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Site Preparation 2 5.00 4.00 0.00 Demolition 4 10.00 4.00 624.00 HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Trenching Utilities 1 3.00 4.00 0.00 Rough Grading 4 10.00 4.00 431.00 HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Building Construction 5 11.00 0.00 0.00 Fine Grading 4 10.00 4.00 305.00 HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Architectural Coatings 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 Paving 7 18.00 0.00 0.00 HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Finishing/Landscaping 5 11.00 0.00 Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3.2 Demolition - 2014 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 12 ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 6.1386 0.0000 6.1386 0.9294 0.0000 0.9294 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 Total 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 6.1386 0.9304 7.0690 0.9294 0.8904 1.8198 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,207.246 9 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 1.7141 10.4480 7.3671 0.0209 0.4940 0.1893 0.6832 0.1352 0.1741 0.3093 2,150.501 0 2,150.501 0 0.0187 2,150.893 2 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0250 8.6900e- 003 0.0337 7.1100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0151 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 2.0480 10.9694 8.5609 0.0231 2,354.096 4 0.0258 2,354.638 2 0.6307 0.1989 0.8296 0.1720 0.1829 0.3549 2,354.096 4 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Dust 2.6243 0.0000 2.6243 0.3973 0.0000 0.3973 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 Total 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 2.6243 0.9296 3.5538 0.3973 0.8895 1.2869 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 1.7141 10.4480 7.3671 0.0209 7.6264 0.1893 7.8157 1.8859 0.1741 2.0600 2,150.501 0 2,150.501 0 0.0187 2,150.893 2 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0233 8.6900e- 003 0.0320 6.7100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0147 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1030 8.7000e- 004 0.1039 0.0275 7.9000e- 004 0.0283 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 2.0480 10.9694 8.5609 0.0231 2,354.096 4 0.0258 2,354.638 2 7.7528 0.1989 7.9517 1.9202 0.1829 2.1030 2,354.096 4 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 0.8920 0.8920 0.8206 0.8206 995.1971 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.373 0 Total 1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.373 0 0.5303 0.8920 1.4223 0.0573 0.8206 0.8779 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 995.1971 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0250 8.6900e- 003 0.0337 7.1100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0151 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.1224 0.0303 0.3166 6.4000e- 004 0.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 57.7283 57.7283 3.1600e- 003 57.7946 Total 0.2115 0.4911 0.8772 1.5000e- 003 145.8671 3.9600e- 003 145.95030.0809 9.1200e- 003 0.0900 0.0219 8.3900e- 003 0.0303 145.8671 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Dust 0.2267 0.0000 0.2267 0.0245 0.0000 0.0245 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 0.8912 0.8912 0.8199 0.8199 0.0000 994.2841 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.454 3 Total 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.454 3 0.2267 0.8912 1.1179 0.0245 0.8199 0.8444 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 994.2841 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0233 8.6900e- 003 0.0320 6.7100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0147 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.1224 0.0303 0.3166 6.4000e- 004 0.0515 4.3000e- 004 0.0520 0.0138 4.0000e- 004 0.0142 57.7283 57.7283 3.1600e- 003 57.7946 Total 0.2115 0.4911 0.8772 1.5000e- 003 3.9600e- 003 145.95030.0749 9.1200e- 003 0.0840 0.0205 8.3900e- 003 0.0289 145.8671 145.8671 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.7705 0.0000 0.7705 0.4165 0.0000 0.4165 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 Total 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.2515 1,212.528 1 0.7705 0.9304 1.7009 0.4165 0.8904 1.3068 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 1.1839 7.2165 5.0885 0.0145 0.3412 0.1308 0.4719 0.0934 0.1203 0.2137 1,485.362 1 1,485.362 1 0.0129 1,485.633 0 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0250 8.6900e- 003 0.0337 7.1100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0151 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 1.5179 7.7379 6.2823 0.0166 0.0200 1,689.378 0 0.4779 0.1403 0.6182 0.1302 0.1290 0.2592 1,688.957 5 1,688.957 5 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.3294 0.0000 0.3294 0.1780 0.0000 0.1780 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 Total 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.2513 1,211.415 7 0.3294 0.9296 1.2590 0.1780 0.8895 1.0676 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 1.1839 7.2165 5.0885 0.0145 5.2676 0.1308 5.3984 1.3026 0.1203 1.4229 1,485.362 1 1,485.362 1 0.0129 1,485.633 0 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0233 8.6900e- 003 0.0320 6.7100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0147 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1030 8.7000e- 004 0.1039 0.0275 7.9000e- 004 0.0283 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 1.5179 7.7379 6.2823 0.0166 1,688.957 5 0.0200 1,689.378 0 5.3940 0.1403 5.5343 1.3368 0.1290 1.4659 1,688.957 5 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Trenching Utilities - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Off-Road 0.4235 5.0563 3.4248 5.2900e- 003 0.2485 0.2485 0.2286 0.2286 561.2224 561.2224 0.1659 564.7052 Total 0.4235 5.0563 3.4248 5.2900e- 003 561.2224 0.1659 564.70520.2485 0.2485 0.2286 0.2286 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 561.2224 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0250 8.6900e- 003 0.0337 7.1100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0151 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.0734 0.0182 0.1900 3.9000e- 004 0.0335 2.6000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.4000e- 004 9.1300e- 003 34.6370 34.6370 1.9000e- 003 34.6768 Total 0.1626 0.4790 0.7505 1.2500e- 003 122.7758 2.7000e- 003 122.83250.0585 8.9500e- 003 0.0675 0.0160 8.2300e- 003 0.0242 122.7758 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Off-Road 0.4231 5.0516 3.4217 5.2900e- 003 0.2483 0.2483 0.2284 0.2284 0.0000 560.7075 560.7075 0.1657 564.1871 Total 0.4231 5.0516 3.4217 5.2900e- 003 560.7075 0.1657 564.18710.2483 0.2483 0.2284 0.2284 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 560.7075 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0233 8.6900e- 003 0.0320 6.7100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0147 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.0734 0.0182 0.1900 3.9000e- 004 0.0309 2.6000e- 004 0.0312 8.2500e- 003 2.4000e- 004 8.4900e- 003 34.6370 34.6370 1.9000e- 003 34.6768 Total 0.1626 0.4790 0.7505 1.2500e- 003 2.7000e- 003 122.83250.0543 8.9500e- 003 0.0632 0.0150 8.2300e- 003 0.0232 122.7758 122.7758 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Fine Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.7882 0.0000 0.7882 0.4192 0.0000 0.4192 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.528 1 Total 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.2515 1,212.528 1 0.7882 0.9304 1.7186 0.4192 0.8904 1.3095 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 1.6757 10.2136 7.2018 0.0205 0.4829 0.1851 0.6679 0.1322 0.1702 0.3024 2,102.252 6 2,102.252 6 0.0183 2,102.636 0 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0250 8.6900e- 003 0.0337 7.1100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0151 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 2.0096 10.7350 8.3956 0.0226 0.0254 2,306.381 0 0.6196 0.1946 0.8142 0.1690 0.1790 0.3480 2,305.848 0 2,305.848 0 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.3370 0.0000 0.3370 0.1792 0.0000 0.1792 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.415 7 Total 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.2513 1,211.415 7 0.3370 0.9296 1.2665 0.1792 0.8895 1.0687 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 1.6757 10.2136 7.2018 0.0205 3.7858 0.1851 3.9709 0.9429 0.1702 1.1131 2,102.252 6 2,102.252 6 0.0183 2,102.636 0 Vendor 0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.6000e- 004 0.0233 8.6900e- 003 0.0320 6.7100e- 003 7.9900e- 003 0.0147 88.1389 88.1389 8.0000e- 004 88.1557 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1030 8.7000e- 004 0.1039 0.0275 7.9000e- 004 0.0283 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 2.0096 10.7350 8.3956 0.0226 2,305.848 0 0.0254 2,306.381 0 3.9122 0.1946 4.1068 0.9771 0.1790 1.1561 2,305.848 0 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 40,950; Non-Residential Outdoor: 13,650 ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Off-Road 1.4930 14.8331 8.3419 0.0113 1.0334 1.0334 0.9507 0.9507 1,204.349 7 1,204.349 7 0.3559 1,211.823 5 Total 1.4930 14.8331 8.3419 0.0113 1,204.349 7 0.3559 1,211.823 5 1.0334 1.0334 0.9507 0.9507 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,204.349 7 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2693 0.0667 0.6965 1.4200e- 003 0.1230 9.5000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.7000e- 004 0.0335 127.0022 127.0022 6.9500e- 003 127.1482 Total 0.2693 0.0667 0.6965 1.4200e- 003 127.0022 6.9500e- 003 127.14820.1230 9.5000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.7000e- 004 0.0335 127.0022 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Off-Road 1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499 0.0000 1,203.244 7 1,203.244 7 0.3556 1,210.711 7 Total 1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 1,203.244 7 0.3556 1,210.711 7 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,203.244 7 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2693 0.0667 0.6965 1.4200e- 003 0.1133 9.5000e- 004 0.1143 0.0303 8.7000e- 004 0.0311 127.0022 127.0022 6.9500e- 003 127.1482 Total 0.2693 0.0667 0.6965 1.4200e- 003 127.0022 6.9500e- 003 127.14820.1133 9.5000e- 004 0.1143 0.0303 8.7000e- 004 0.0311 127.0022 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Building Construction - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Off-Road 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 Total 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,191.702 1 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 0.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334 122.5000 122.5000 6.3500e- 003 122.6335 Total 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 122.5000 6.3500e- 003 122.63350.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334 122.5000 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Off-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 Total 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,190.608 8 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 0.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311 122.5000 122.5000 6.3500e- 003 122.6335 Total 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 6.3500e- 003 122.63350.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311 122.5000 122.5000 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Paving - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 1.2092 11.5427 7.3586 0.0111 0.7247 0.7247 0.6703 0.6703 1,093.543 3 1,093.543 3 0.2970 1,099.779 4 Paving 0.0561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2654 11.5427 7.3586 0.0111 0.2970 1,099.779 4 0.7247 0.7247 0.6703 0.6703 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,093.543 3 1,093.543 3 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4114 0.0981 1.0263 2.3100e- 003 0.2012 1.4600e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3400e- 003 0.0547 200.4546 200.4546 0.0104 200.6729 Total 0.4114 0.0981 1.0263 2.3100e- 003 0.0104 200.67290.2012 1.4600e- 003 0.2027 0.0534 1.3400e- 003 0.0547 200.4546 200.4546 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 1.2081 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 0.7240 0.7240 0.6697 0.6697 0.0000 1,092.540 1 1,092.540 1 0.2967 1,098.770 5 Paving 0.0561 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2643 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 0.2967 1,098.770 5 0.7240 0.7240 0.6697 0.6697 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,092.540 1 1,092.540 1 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.4114 0.0981 1.0263 2.3100e- 003 0.1855 1.4600e- 003 0.1869 0.0495 1.3400e- 003 0.0508 200.4546 200.4546 0.0104 200.6729 Total 0.4114 0.0981 1.0263 2.3100e- 003 0.0104 200.67290.1855 1.4600e- 003 0.1869 0.0495 1.3400e- 003 0.0508 200.4546 200.4546 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Archit. Coating 90.3825 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4066 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 281.4481 281.4481 0.0367 282.2177 Total 90.7891 2.5703 1.9018 2.9700e- 003 0.0367 282.21770.2209 0.2209 0.2209 0.2209 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 281.4481 281.4481 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0457 0.0109 0.1140 2.6000e- 004 0.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.5000e- 004 6.0800e- 003 22.2727 22.2727 1.1600e- 003 22.2970 Total 0.0457 0.0109 0.1140 2.6000e- 004 1.1600e- 003 22.29700.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.5000e- 004 6.0800e- 003 22.2727 22.2727 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Archit. Coating 90.3825 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4062 2.5680 1.9000 2.9700e- 003 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0366 281.9587 Total 90.7887 2.5680 1.9000 2.9700e- 003 0.0366 281.95870.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0457 0.0109 0.1140 2.6000e- 004 0.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.6500e- 003 22.2727 22.2727 1.1600e- 003 22.2970 Total 0.0457 0.0109 0.1140 2.6000e- 004 1.1600e- 003 22.29700.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.6500e- 003 22.2727 22.2727 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.10 Finishing/Landscaping - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 Total 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 0.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334 122.5000 122.5000 6.3500e- 003 122.6335 Total 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 6.3500e- 003 122.63350.1230 8.9000e- 004 0.1239 0.0326 8.2000e- 004 0.0334 122.5000 122.5000 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Off-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 Total 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 0.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311 122.5000 122.5000 6.3500e- 003 122.6335 Total 0.2514 0.0600 0.6272 1.4100e- 003 6.3500e- 003 122.63350.1133 8.9000e- 004 0.1142 0.0303 8.2000e- 004 0.0311 122.5000 122.5000 CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Mitigated 5.4202 3.6880 16.2732 0.0420 3.1748 0.0500 3.2248 0.8470 0.0460 0.8931 3,654.021 9 3,654.021 9 0.1480 3,657.129 5 Unmitigated 5.4202 3.6880 16.2732 0.0420 3.1748 0.0500 3.2248 0.8470 0.0460 0.8931 3,654.021 9 3,654.021 9 0.1480 3,657.129 5 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT High School 235.89 79.97 32.76 788,364 788,364 High School 100.54 34.09 13.96 336,024 336,024 High School 15.47 5.24 2.15 51,696 51,696 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 351.90 119.30 48.87 1,176,084 1,176,084 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.511008 0.057223 0.191597 0.152361 0.041328 0.005882 0.015289 0.002141 0.004713 0.000509 0.0022390.014281 0.001428 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.8646 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.86466.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 6.9200e- 003 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 High School 40.8 4.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 003 3.3600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 4.8000 4.8000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 4.8292 High School 622.2 6.7100e- 003 0.0610 0.0512 3.7000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 73.2000 73.2000 1.4000e- 003 1.3400e- 003 73.6455 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 High School 265.2 2.8600e- 003 0.0260 0.0218 1.6000e- 004 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 31.2000 31.2000 6.0000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 31.3899 Total 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 5.5000e- 004 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 109.8646 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 High School 0.0408 4.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 003 3.3600e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 3.0000e- 004 4.8000 4.8000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 4.8292 High School 0.2652 2.8600e- 003 0.0260 0.0218 1.6000e- 004 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.9800e- 003 31.2000 31.2000 6.0000e- 004 5.7000e- 004 31.3899 High School 0.6222 6.7100e- 003 0.0610 0.0512 3.7000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 4.6400e- 003 73.2000 73.2000 1.4000e- 003 1.3400e- 003 73.6455 Total 0.0100 0.0910 0.0764 109.2000 109.2000 2.0900e- 003 2.0000e- 003 5.5000e- 004 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 6.9200e- 003 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 6.9200e- 003 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 109.8646 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Mitigated 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 Unmitigated 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Architectural Coating 0.1733 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5405 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 Total 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Architectural Coating 0.1733 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5405 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 Total 0.7142 3.0000e- 005 2.8700e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 6.0100e- 003 6.0100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 6.3600e- 003 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Population High School 3.69 1000sqft 0.08 3,695.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 3:02 PM Servite HS Construction Model Run 2 Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics Trips and VMT - 4 trips added for water trucks 2 trips for worker trips added for architectural coatings. Demolition - Grading - 28 cu.yards exported, to place footings for foundation. No more cut-out as foundation will be load bearing. Architectural Coating - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Construction mitigation measures Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - 1 excavator for trenching added 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - baseball field Construction Phase - As provided by the client's architect Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 2.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 28.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,690.00 3,695.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/16/2015 8/17/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/29/2015 8/17/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/29/2015 8/31/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/2/2016 1/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/11/2015 8/28/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/2/2016 1/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/14/2015 8/15/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/31/2015 8/1/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2016 1/7/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/4/2016 4/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 10.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 13.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 66.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 10.00 tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 90.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value 2.2 Overall Operational 0.0000 0.1119 0.1119 0.1327 0.0000 0.112041.5964 0.1190 6.0378 45.7093 0.1171 2.9754 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0898 0.1169 0.1154 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 110.1751 110.1751 0.0301 0.0000 110.80729.0000e- 003 0.0923 0.1013 3.1000e- 003 0.0853 0.0884Total0.1892 1.3587 0.8399 1.1700e- 003 0.0000 37.7812 37.7812 0.0109 0.0000 38.01029.2000e- 004 0.0320 0.0329 2.5000e- 004 0.0295 0.029720160.0919 0.4679 0.2872 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 72.3939 72.3939 0.0192 0.0000 72.79708.0800e- 003 0.0603 0.0684 2.8500e- 003 0.0558 0.058720150.0973 0.8908 0.5527 7.7000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 110.2986 110.2986 0.0301 0.0000 110.93140.0154 0.0924 0.1078 5.7100e- 003 0.0854 0.0911Total0.1893 1.3603 0.8409 1.1700e- 003 0.0000 37.8246 37.8246 0.0109 0.0000 38.05391.0000e- 003 0.0320 0.0330 2.7000e- 004 0.0295 0.029820160.0919 0.4685 0.2876 4.0000e- 004 0.0000 72.4740 72.4740 0.0192 0.0000 72.87750.0144 0.0604 0.0748 5.4400e- 003 0.0559 0.061320150.0974 0.8918 0.5533 7.7000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1.0132 75.7522 76.7654 0.0646 2.2000e- 004 78.19110.0600 1.1300e- 003 0.0612 0.0160 1.0500e- 003 0.0171Total0.1109 0.0747 0.3184 8.3000e- 004 0.0389 1.4582 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.61580.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 0.9744 0.0000 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 2.18360.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 64.5403 64.5403 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 64.59450.0600 9.6000e- 004 0.0610 0.0160 8.8000e- 004 0.0169Mobile0.0931 0.0724 0.3165 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 9.7535 9.7535 3.8000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 9.79701.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Energy 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0176 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1.0132 75.7522 76.7654 0.0646 2.2000e- 004 78.19110.0600 1.1300e- 003 0.0612 0.0160 1.0500e- 003 0.0171Total0.1109 0.0747 0.3184 8.3000e- 004 0.0389 1.4582 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.61590.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 0.9744 0.0000 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 2.18360.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 64.5403 64.5403 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 64.59450.0600 9.6000e- 004 0.0610 0.0160 8.8000e- 004 0.0169Mobile0.0931 0.0724 0.3165 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 9.7535 9.7535 3.8000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 9.79701.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Energy 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0176 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 57Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 1/1/2016 1/7/2016 5 90 6 Finishing/Landscaping Building Construction 1/1/2016 4/1/2016 5 66 5 Building Construction Building Construction 8/31/2015 1/1/2016 5 10 4 Trenching/Utilities Trenching 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 5 10 3 Fine Grading Grading 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 5 13 2 Rough Grading Grading 8/2/2015 8/15/2015 5 10 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/15/2015 8/1/2015 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.6735e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTArchitectural Coatings 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Finishing/Landscaping 5 2.00 1.00 0.00 Building Construction 5 2.00 1.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching/Utilities 1 3.00 4.00 0.00 Fine Grading 4 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Rough Grading 4 10.00 4.00 4.00 Site Preparation 2 5.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Architectural Coatings Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Finishing/Landscaping Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Finishing/Landscaping Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Finishing/Landscaping Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Trenching/Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 0.0000 5.8056 5.8056 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 5.84203.4500e- 003 5.7200e- 003 9.1700e- 003 3.7000e- 004 5.2600e- 003 5.6300e- 003 Total 9.2400e- 003 0.0930 0.0481 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.8056 5.8056 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 5.84205.7200e- 003 5.7200e- 003 5.2600e- 003 5.2600e- 003 Off-Road 9.2400e- 003 0.0930 0.0481 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00003.4500e- 003 0.0000 3.4500e- 003 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 3.7000e- 004 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 6.5 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 3.2 Site Preparation - 2015 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction 0.0000 5.7987 5.7987 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 5.83511.4700e- 003 5.7100e- 003 7.1800e- 003 1.6000e- 004 5.2500e- 003 5.4100e- 003 Total 9.2300e- 003 0.0928 0.0481 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.7987 5.7987 1.7300e- 003 0.0000 5.83515.7100e- 003 5.7100e- 003 5.2500e- 003 5.2500e- 003 Off-Road 9.2300e- 003 0.0928 0.0481 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00001.4700e- 003 0.0000 1.4700e- 003 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.6000e- 004 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.8486 0.8486 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.84915.2000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 5.6000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 Total 1.1300e- 003 2.8400e- 003 5.1400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3333 0.3333 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.33363.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.6000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 Worker 6.5000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 0.0000 0.51541.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 Vendor 4.8000e- 004 2.6600e- 003 3.2500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.4460 5.4460 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46943.7700e- 003 4.3700e- 003 8.1400e- 003 2.0700e- 003 4.1800e- 003 6.2500e- 003 Total 7.0600e- 003 0.0597 0.0441 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.4460 5.4460 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46944.3700e- 003 4.3700e- 003 4.1800e- 003 4.1800e- 003 Off-Road 7.0600e- 003 0.0597 0.0441 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00003.7700e- 003 0.0000 3.7700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 0.0000 2.0700e- 003 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Rough Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.8486 0.8486 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.84914.8000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 5.2000e- 004 1.3000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 Total 1.1300e- 003 2.8400e- 003 5.1400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3333 0.3333 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.33363.3000e- 004 0.0000 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 Worker 6.5000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 1.8900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.5153 0.5153 0.0000 0.0000 0.51541.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 1.9000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 8.0000e- 005 Vendor 4.8000e- 004 2.6600e- 003 3.2500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.4395 5.4395 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46291.6100e- 003 4.3700e- 003 5.9800e- 003 8.8000e- 004 4.1700e- 003 5.0500e- 003 Total 7.0500e- 003 0.0596 0.0440 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.4395 5.4395 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46294.3700e- 003 4.3700e- 003 4.1700e- 003 4.1700e- 003 Off-Road 7.0500e- 003 0.0596 0.0440 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00001.6100e- 003 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.8000e- 004 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1.0450 1.0450 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.04577.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 7.5000e- 004 2.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 Total 1.4700e- 003 2.9800e- 003 5.8800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5127 0.5127 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.51335.5000e- 004 0.0000 5.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 Worker 1.0000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3964 0.3964 0.0000 0.0000 0.39651.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 Vendor 3.7000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.1359 0.1359 0.0000 0.0000 0.13593.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Hauling 1.0000e- 004 6.6000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.4460 5.4460 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46943.7600e- 003 4.3700e- 003 8.1300e- 003 2.0700e- 003 4.1800e- 003 6.2500e- 003 Total 7.0600e- 003 0.0597 0.0441 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.4460 5.4460 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46944.3700e- 003 4.3700e- 003 4.1800e- 003 4.1800e- 003 Off-Road 7.0600e- 003 0.0597 0.0441 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00003.7600e- 003 0.0000 3.7600e- 003 2.0700e- 003 0.0000 2.0700e- 003 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Fine Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.0450 1.0450 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.04578.7000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 Total 1.4700e- 003 2.9800e- 003 5.8800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5127 0.5127 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.51335.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 Worker 1.0000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3964 0.3964 0.0000 0.0000 0.39651.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 Vendor 3.7000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.1359 0.1359 0.0000 0.0000 0.13592.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 Hauling 1.0000e- 004 6.6000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.4395 5.4395 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46291.6100e- 003 4.3700e- 003 5.9800e- 003 8.8000e- 004 4.1700e- 003 5.0500e- 003 Total 7.0500e- 003 0.0596 0.0440 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.4395 5.4395 1.1100e- 003 0.0000 5.46294.3700e- 003 4.3700e- 003 4.1700e- 003 4.1700e- 003 Off-Road 7.0500e- 003 0.0596 0.0440 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00001.6100e- 003 0.0000 1.6100e- 003 8.8000e- 004 0.0000 8.8000e- 004 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.9092 0.9092 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.90986.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 7.1000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 Total 1.3700e- 003 2.3200e- 003 5.4100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5127 0.5127 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.51335.5000e- 004 0.0000 5.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 Worker 1.0000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3964 0.3964 0.0000 0.0000 0.39651.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 Vendor 3.7000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 2.5200 2.5200 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 2.53581.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 Total 2.0800e- 003 0.0243 0.0172 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.5200 2.5200 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 2.53581.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 Off-Road 2.0800e- 003 0.0243 0.0172 3.0000e- 005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Trenching/Utilities - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.9092 0.9092 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.90986.3000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 6.6000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 004 Total 1.3700e- 003 2.3200e- 003 5.4100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5127 0.5127 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.51335.1000e- 004 0.0000 5.1000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 1.4000e- 004 Worker 1.0000e- 003 2.8000e- 004 2.9100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.3964 0.3964 0.0000 0.0000 0.39651.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 Vendor 3.7000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 2.5170 2.5170 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 2.53271.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 Total 2.0800e- 003 0.0243 0.0172 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.5170 2.5170 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 2.53271.2000e- 003 1.2000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 1.1000e- 003 Off-Road 2.0800e- 003 0.0243 0.0172 3.0000e- 005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.5502 0.5502 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.55052.8000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 004 Total 6.7000e- 004 2.1200e- 003 3.3700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.1538 0.1538 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.15401.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 3.0000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.3964 0.3964 0.0000 0.0000 0.39651.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 Vendor 3.7000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 48.1087 48.1087 0.0144 0.0000 48.41030.0445 0.0445 0.0409 0.0409Total0.0647 0.6398 0.3693 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 48.1087 48.1087 0.0144 0.0000 48.41030.0445 0.0445 0.0409 0.0409Off-Road 0.0647 0.6398 0.3693 5.0000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.5502 0.5502 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.55052.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 Total 6.7000e- 004 2.1200e- 003 3.3700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.1538 0.1538 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.15401.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 3.0000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.3964 0.3964 0.0000 0.0000 0.39651.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 Vendor 3.7000e- 004 2.0400e- 003 2.5000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 48.0515 48.0515 0.0144 0.0000 48.35270.0444 0.0444 0.0409 0.0409Total0.0646 0.6391 0.3688 5.0000e- 004 0.0000 48.0515 48.0515 0.0144 0.0000 48.35270.0444 0.0444 0.0409 0.0409Off-Road 0.0646 0.6391 0.3688 5.0000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.7947 1.7947 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.79581.2500e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.3300e- 003 3.4000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 4.2000e- 004 Total 2.6000e- 003 5.0500e- 003 0.0107 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9127 0.9127 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.91379.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.7000e- 004 Worker 1.7700e- 003 5.0000e- 004 5.1800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8820 0.8820 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88222.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.5000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 1.5000e- 004 Vendor 8.3000e- 004 4.5500e- 003 5.5600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.5346 0.5346 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.53804.7000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 Total 6.9000e- 004 6.8500e- 003 4.1100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5346 0.5346 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.53804.7000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 Off-Road 6.9000e- 004 6.8500e- 003 4.1100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.7947 1.7947 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.79581.1600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 1.2400e- 003 3.1000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 Total 2.6000e- 003 5.0500e- 003 0.0107 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9127 0.9127 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.91379.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 2.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 Worker 1.7700e- 003 5.0000e- 004 5.1800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8820 0.8820 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.88222.6000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 1.4000e- 004 Vendor 8.3000e- 004 4.5500e- 003 5.5600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.5340 0.5340 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.53734.7000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 Total 6.9000e- 004 6.8400e- 003 4.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5340 0.5340 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.53734.7000e- 004 4.7000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 Off-Road 6.9000e- 004 6.8400e- 003 4.1000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 0.0000 0.01971.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total3.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 003 9.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 9.9100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 9.8000e- 003 9.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 9.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 35.2825 35.2825 0.0106 0.0000 35.50600.0310 0.0310 0.0285 0.0285Total0.0456 0.4523 0.2710 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 35.2825 35.2825 0.0106 0.0000 35.50600.0310 0.0310 0.0285 0.0285Off-Road 0.0456 0.4523 0.2710 3.7000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Finishing/Landscaping - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,543; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,848 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.0197 0.0197 0.0000 0.0000 0.01971.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total3.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 9.9000e- 003 9.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 9.9100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Worker2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 9.8000e- 003 9.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 9.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor1.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 35.2405 35.2405 0.0106 0.0000 35.46380.0310 0.0310 0.0285 0.0285Total0.0455 0.4518 0.2707 3.7000e- 004 0.0000 35.2405 35.2405 0.0106 0.0000 35.46380.0310 0.0310 0.0285 0.0285Off-Road 0.0455 0.4518 0.2707 3.7000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1.3000 1.3000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.30089.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 9.8000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 004 Total 1.7900e- 003 3.3100e- 003 7.3700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6531 0.6531 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.65387.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.3000e- 004 1.9000e- 004 0.0000 2.0000e- 004 Worker 1.2300e- 003 3.3000e- 004 3.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6469 0.6469 0.0000 0.0000 0.64702.0000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 2.5000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 Vendor 5.6000e- 004 2.9800e- 003 3.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63994.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 Total 0.0437 5.9300e- 003 4.7100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63994.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 Off-Road 9.2000e- 004 5.9300e- 003 4.7100e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0428 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coatings - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.3000 1.3000 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.30088.6000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 9.1000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 2.8000e- 004 Total 1.7900e- 003 3.3100e- 003 7.3700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6531 0.6531 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.65386.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 6.7000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 Worker 1.2300e- 003 3.3000e- 004 3.4800e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6469 0.6469 0.0000 0.0000 0.64701.9000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 2.4000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 004 Vendor 5.6000e- 004 2.9800e- 003 3.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.6376 0.6376 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63914.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 Total 0.0437 5.9200e- 003 4.7000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6376 0.6376 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63914.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 4.9000e- 004 Off-Road 9.2000e- 004 5.9200e- 003 4.7000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0428 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.04955.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.04955.0000e- 005 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 64.5403 64.5403 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 64.59450.0600 9.6000e- 004 0.0610 0.0160 8.8000e- 004 0.0169Unmitigated0.0931 0.0724 0.3165 8.2000e- 004 0.0000 64.5403 64.5403 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 64.59450.0600 9.6000e- 004 0.0610 0.0160 8.8000e- 004 0.0169Mitigated0.0931 0.0724 0.3165 8.2000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.04955.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0495 0.0495 0.0000 0.0000 0.04955.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 2.4470 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.46191.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 NaturalGas Unmitigated 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.4470 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.46191.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 NaturalGas Mitigated 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.3065 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.33510.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 7.3065 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.33510.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity Mitigated NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.002141 0.004713 0.000509 0.002239 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N MH 0.511008 0.057223 0.191597 0.152361 0.041328 0.005882 0.015289 0.014281 0.001428 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUSLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 4.4 Fleet Mix H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 47.56 16.13 6.61 158,965 158,965 Annual VMT High School 47.56 16.13 6.61 158,965 158,965 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 2.4470 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.46191.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 2.4619 Total 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.4470 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 1.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr High School 45854.9 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 2.4619 Mitigated 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.4470 2.4619 Total 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.4470 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 High School 45854.9 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 7.3351 Total 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.3351 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr High School 25532.5 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 Mitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 7.3351 Total 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.3351 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr High School 25532.5 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0176 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 4.2800e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0176 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0176 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Unmitigated 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.6159 Category t o n MT/yr Mitigated 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.6158 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0176 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 9.0000e- 005 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping0.0000 0.0000 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0134 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 4.2800e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1.6158 Total 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.6158 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr High School 0.122525 / 0.315065 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 Mitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 1.6159 Total 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 1.6159 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr High School 0.122525 / 0.315065 1.4971 4.0600e- 003 1.1000e- 004 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 2.1836 Total 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 2.1836 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr High School 4.8 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 2.1836 t o n MT/yr Mitigated 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 2.1836 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power 2.1836 Total 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 2.1836 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr High School 4.8 0.9744 0.0576 0.0000 Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Population High School 3.69 1000sqft 0.08 3,695.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 3:01 PM Servite HS Construction Model Run 2 Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics Trips and VMT - 4 trips added for water trucks 2 trips for worker trips added for architectural coatings. Demolition - Grading - 28 cu.yards exported, to place footings for foundation. No more cut-out as foundation will be load bearing. Architectural Coating - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Construction mitigation measures Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - 1 excavator for trenching added 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - baseball field Construction Phase - As provided by the client's architect Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 2.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 28.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,690.00 3,695.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/16/2015 8/17/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/29/2015 8/17/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/29/2015 8/31/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/2/2016 1/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/11/2015 8/28/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/2/2016 1/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/14/2015 8/15/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/31/2015 8/1/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2016 1/7/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/4/2016 4/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 10.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 13.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 66.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 10.00 tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 90.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value 2.2 Overall Operational 0.0000 0.0834 0.0834 0.0908 0.0000 0.083443.9534 0.0910 10.7313 49.5962 0.0914 7.0184 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0201 0.0897 0.0856 0.0629 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 4,830.430 0 4,830.430 0 1.1665 0.0000 4,854.925 8 0.5759 3.2057 3.7816 0.2459 2.9959 3.2419Total22.6093 47.5945 32.7235 0.0477 0.0000 2,747.584 9 2,747.584 9 0.7470 0.0000 2,763.271 8 0.0735 2.0775 2.1510 0.0199 1.9270 1.9469201620.3956 29.9565 18.8253 0.0269 0.0000 2,082.845 1 2,082.845 1 0.4195 0.0000 2,091.654 0 0.5024 1.1282 1.6306 0.2261 1.0689 1.295020152.2137 17.6380 13.8982 0.0208 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 4,834.461 9 4,834.461 9 1.1675 0.0000 4,858.980 0 1.0276 3.2086 4.2362 0.4879 2.9987 3.4866Total22.6138 47.6372 32.7516 0.0477 0.0000 2,750.005 6 2,750.005 6 0.7477 0.0000 2,765.706 9 0.0796 2.0794 2.1590 0.0214 1.9288 1.9501201620.3984 29.9838 18.8421 0.0269 0.0000 2,084.456 3 2,084.456 3 0.4199 0.0000 2,093.273 1 0.9481 1.1292 2.0772 0.4666 1.0699 1.536420152.2154 17.6534 13.9095 0.0208 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 531.4138 531.4138 0.0203 2.7000e- 004 531.92370.4291 7.6800e- 003 0.4368 0.1145 7.1400e- 003 0.1216Total0.7211 0.4835 2.2651 6.0100e- 003 516.6330 516.6330 0.0200 517.05290.4291 6.7400e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2000e- 003 0.1207Mobile0.6231 0.4712 2.2544 5.9400e- 003 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 Energy 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 531.4138 531.4138 0.0203 2.7000e- 004 531.92370.4291 7.6800e- 003 0.4368 0.1145 7.1400e- 003 0.1216Total0.7211 0.4835 2.2651 6.0100e- 003 516.6330 516.6330 0.0200 517.05290.4291 6.7400e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2000e- 003 0.1207Mobile0.6231 0.4712 2.2544 5.9400e- 003 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 Energy 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Architectural Coatings Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Finishing/Landscaping Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Finishing/Landscaping Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Finishing/Landscaping Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Trenching/Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 5 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 7 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 1/1/2016 1/7/2016 5 90 6 Finishing/Landscaping Building Construction 1/1/2016 4/1/2016 5 66 5 Building Construction Building Construction 8/31/2015 1/1/2016 5 10 4 Trenching/Utilities Trenching 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 5 10 3 Fine Grading Grading 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 5 13 2 Rough Grading Grading 8/2/2015 8/15/2015 5 10 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/15/2015 8/1/2015 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Architectural Coatings 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Finishing/Landscaping 5 2.00 1.00 0.00 Building Construction 5 2.00 1.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching/Utilities 1 3.00 4.00 0.00 Fine Grading 4 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Rough Grading 4 10.00 4.00 4.00 Site Preparation 2 5.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 146.4940 146.4940 3.5700e- 003 146.56890.0809 7.0100e- 003 0.0879 0.0219 6.4300e- 003 0.0284Total0.1652 0.4164 0.7377 1.5500e- 003 58.7913 58.7913 2.8900e- 003 58.85190.0559 4.1000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 3.7000e- 004 0.0152Worker0.0942 0.0248 0.3018 6.8000e- 004 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0250 6.6000e- 003 0.0316 7.1200e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0132Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 984.5542 984.5542 0.2939 990.72670.5303 0.8797 1.4100 0.0573 0.8093 0.8666Total1.4222 14.2999 7.4063 9.3600e- 003 984.5542 984.5542 0.2939 990.72670.8797 0.8797 0.8093 0.8093Off-Road 1.4222 14.2999 7.4063 9.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 6.5 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3.2 Site Preparation - 2015 146.4940 146.4940 3.5700e- 003 146.56890.0749 7.0100e- 003 0.0819 0.0205 6.4300e- 003 0.0269Total0.1652 0.4164 0.7377 1.5500e- 003 58.7913 58.7913 2.8900e- 003 58.85190.0515 4.1000e- 004 0.0519 0.0138 3.7000e- 004 0.0141Worker0.0942 0.0248 0.3018 6.8000e- 004 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0234 6.6000e- 003 0.0299 6.7100e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0128Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 983.6509 983.6509 0.2937 989.81780.2267 0.8789 1.1056 0.0245 0.8086 0.8331Total1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.3500e- 003 0.0000 983.6509 983.6509 0.2937 989.81780.8789 0.8789 0.8086 0.8086Off-Road 1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.2267 0.0000 0.2267 0.0245 0.0000 0.0245Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 235.2684 235.2684 6.6900e- 003 235.40890.1437 9.4800e- 003 0.1532 0.0387 8.7100e- 003 0.0474Total0.2787 0.5660 1.1245 2.5200e- 003 117.5826 117.5826 5.7800e- 003 117.70390.1118 8.1000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.5000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.1884 0.0496 0.6036 1.3600e- 003 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0250 6.6000e- 003 0.0316 7.1200e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0132Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 29.9832 29.9832 2.3000e- 004 29.98816.9700e- 003 2.0700e- 003 9.0400e- 003 1.9100e- 003 1.9000e- 003 3.8100e- 003 Hauling 0.0193 0.1249 0.0850 2.9000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.7531 0.8748 1.6279 0.4138 0.8359 1.2497Total1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.8748 0.8748 0.8359 0.8359Off-Road 1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.7531 0.0000 0.7531 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Rough Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 235.2684 235.2684 6.6900e- 003 235.40890.1762 9.4800e- 003 0.1857 0.0466 8.7100e- 003 0.0554Total0.2787 0.5660 1.1245 2.5200e- 003 117.5826 117.5826 5.7800e- 003 117.70390.1030 8.1000e- 004 0.1038 0.0275 7.5000e- 004 0.0282Worker0.1884 0.0496 0.6036 1.3600e- 003 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0234 6.6000e- 003 0.0299 6.7100e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0128Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 29.9832 29.9832 2.3000e- 004 29.98810.0498 2.0700e- 003 0.0519 0.0124 1.9000e- 003 0.0143Hauling0.0193 0.1249 0.0850 2.9000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.3219 0.8740 1.1960 0.1769 0.8351 1.0120Total1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.8740 0.8740 0.8351 0.8351Off-Road 1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3219 0.0000 0.3219 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 205.2852 205.2852 6.4600e- 003 205.42080.1368 7.4100e- 003 0.1442 0.0368 6.8100e- 003 0.0436Total0.2594 0.4412 1.0395 2.2300e- 003 117.5826 117.5826 5.7800e- 003 117.70390.1118 8.1000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.5000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.1884 0.0496 0.6036 1.3600e- 003 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0250 6.6000e- 003 0.0316 7.1200e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0132Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.7528 0.8748 1.6276 0.4138 0.8359 1.2496Total1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.8748 0.8748 0.8359 0.8359Off-Road 1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Fine Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 205.2852 205.2852 6.4600e- 003 205.42080.1264 7.4100e- 003 0.1338 0.0342 6.8100e- 003 0.0410Total0.2594 0.4412 1.0395 2.2300e- 003 117.5826 117.5826 5.7800e- 003 117.70390.1030 8.1000e- 004 0.1038 0.0275 7.5000e- 004 0.0282Worker0.1884 0.0496 0.6036 1.3600e- 003 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0234 6.6000e- 003 0.0299 6.7100e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0128Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.3218 0.8740 1.1958 0.1769 0.8351 1.0120Total1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.8740 0.8740 0.8351 0.8351Off-Road 1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3218 0.0000 0.3218 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 122.9774 122.9774 2.4100e- 003 123.02810.0585 6.8400e- 003 0.0654 0.0160 6.2800e- 003 0.0223Total0.1275 0.4065 0.6170 1.2800e- 003 35.2748 35.2748 1.7300e- 003 35.31120.0335 2.4000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.2000e- 004 9.1200e- 003 Worker 0.0565 0.0149 0.1811 4.1000e- 004 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0250 6.6000e- 003 0.0316 7.1200e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0132Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 555.5551 555.5551 0.1659 559.03810.2401 0.2401 0.2209 0.2209Total0.4166 4.8648 3.4392 5.2900e- 003 555.5551 555.5551 0.1659 559.03810.2401 0.2401 0.2209 0.2209Off-Road 0.4166 4.8648 3.4392 5.2900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Trenching/Utilities - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 122.9774 122.9774 2.4100e- 003 123.02810.0543 6.8400e- 003 0.0611 0.0150 6.2800e- 003 0.0213Total0.1275 0.4065 0.6170 1.2800e- 003 35.2748 35.2748 1.7300e- 003 35.31120.0309 2.4000e- 004 0.0312 8.2500e- 003 2.2000e- 004 8.4700e- 003 Worker 0.0565 0.0149 0.1811 4.1000e- 004 87.7027 87.7027 6.8000e- 004 87.71690.0234 6.6000e- 003 0.0299 6.7100e- 003 6.0600e- 003 0.0128Vendor0.0709 0.3916 0.4359 8.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 555.0454 555.0454 0.1657 558.52520.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207Total0.4162 4.8604 3.4360 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 555.0454 555.0454 0.1657 558.52520.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207Off-Road 0.4162 4.8604 3.4360 5.2900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 45.4422 45.4422 1.3300e- 003 45.47000.0286 1.8100e- 003 0.0304 7.7100e- 003 1.6700e- 003 9.3800e- 003 Total 0.0554 0.1078 0.2297 4.9000e- 004 23.5165 23.5165 1.1600e- 003 23.54080.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.5000e- 004 6.0800e- 003 Worker 0.0377 9.9100e- 003 0.1207 2.7000e- 004 21.9257 21.9257 1.7000e- 004 21.92926.2500e- 003 1.6500e- 003 7.9000e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.5200e- 003 3.3000e- 003 Vendor 0.0177 0.0979 0.1090 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Total1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Off-Road 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 45.4422 45.4422 1.3300e- 003 45.47000.0265 1.8100e- 003 0.0283 7.1800e- 003 1.6700e- 003 8.8400e- 003 Total 0.0554 0.1078 0.2297 4.9000e- 004 23.5165 23.5165 1.1600e- 003 23.54080.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.6500e- 003 Worker 0.0377 9.9100e- 003 0.1207 2.7000e- 004 21.9257 21.9257 1.7000e- 004 21.92925.8400e- 003 1.6500e- 003 7.4900e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.5200e- 003 3.1900e- 003 Vendor 0.0177 0.0979 0.1090 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Off-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 44.3779 44.3779 1.2200e- 003 44.40360.0286 1.5300e- 003 0.0301 7.7100e- 003 1.4000e- 003 9.1100e- 003 Total 0.0515 0.0955 0.2120 4.9000e- 004 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Worker 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 21.6859 21.6859 1.5000e- 004 21.68916.2500e- 003 1.3700e- 003 7.6200e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.2600e- 003 3.0400e- 003 Vendor 0.0162 0.0865 0.1022 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Total1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Off-Road 1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 44.3779 44.3779 1.2200e- 003 44.40360.0265 1.5300e- 003 0.0280 7.1800e- 003 1.4000e- 003 8.5800e- 003 Total 0.0515 0.0955 0.2120 4.9000e- 004 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Worker 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 21.6859 21.6859 1.5000e- 004 21.68915.8400e- 003 1.3700e- 003 7.2100e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.2600e- 003 2.9400e- 003 Vendor 0.0162 0.0865 0.1022 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Off-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 44.3779 44.3779 1.2200e- 003 44.40360.0286 1.5300e- 003 0.0301 7.7100e- 003 1.4000e- 003 9.1100e- 003 Total 0.0515 0.0955 0.2120 4.9000e- 004 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Worker 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 21.6859 21.6859 1.5000e- 004 21.68916.2500e- 003 1.3700e- 003 7.6200e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.2600e- 003 3.0400e- 003 Vendor 0.0162 0.0865 0.1022 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Total1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Off-Road 1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Finishing/Landscaping - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,543; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,848 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 44.3779 44.3779 1.2200e- 003 44.40360.0265 1.5300e- 003 0.0280 7.1800e- 003 1.4000e- 003 8.5800e- 003 Total 0.0515 0.0955 0.2120 4.9000e- 004 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Worker 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 21.6859 21.6859 1.5000e- 004 21.68915.8400e- 003 1.3700e- 003 7.2100e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.2600e- 003 2.9400e- 003 Vendor 0.0162 0.0865 0.1022 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Off-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Total 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Worker 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.14490.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966Total17.4971 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.14490.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966Off-Road 0.3685 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 17.1286 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coatings - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Total 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 22.6920 22.6920 1.0700e- 003 22.71440.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Worker 0.0353 8.9600e- 003 0.1098 2.7000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0332 281.88600.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964Total17.4968 2.3701 1.8822 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0332 281.88600.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964Off-Road 0.3681 2.3701 1.8822 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 17.1286 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.002141 0.004713 0.000509 0.002239 MH 0.511008 0.057223 0.191597 0.152361 0.041328 0.005882 0.015289 0.014281 0.001428 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUSLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 4.4 Fleet Mix H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 47.56 16.13 6.61 158,965 158,965 Annual VMT High School 47.56 16.13 6.61 158,965 158,965 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 516.6330 516.6330 0.0200 517.05290.4291 6.7400e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2000e- 003 0.1207Unmitigated0.6231 0.4712 2.2544 5.9400e- 003 516.6330 516.6330 0.0200 517.05290.4291 6.7400e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2000e- 003 0.1207Mitigated0.6231 0.4712 2.2544 5.9400e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.8700 Total 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 High School 125.63 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 NaturalGas Unmitigated 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 NaturalGas Mitigated 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.8700 6.0 Area Detail 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.8700 Total 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day High School 0.12563 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO Mitigated 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0732 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0235 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0732 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0235 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Population High School 3.69 1000sqft 0.08 3,695.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 3:00 PM Servite HS Construction Model Run 2 Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics Trips and VMT - 4 trips added for water trucks 2 trips for worker trips added for architectural coatings. Demolition - Grading - 28 cu.yards exported, to place footings for foundation. No more cut-out as foundation will be load bearing. Architectural Coating - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - SCAQMD Construction mitigation measures Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - 1 excavator for trenching added 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - baseball field Construction Phase - As provided by the client's architect Off-road Equipment - Off-road Equipment - tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 0.00 2.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 4.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 28.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,690.00 3,695.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/16/2015 8/17/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/29/2015 8/17/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 8/29/2015 8/31/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 1/2/2016 1/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 9/11/2015 8/28/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 4/2/2016 1/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 8/14/2015 8/15/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 7/31/2015 8/1/2015 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/8/2016 1/7/2016 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 4/4/2016 4/1/2016 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 10.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 1.00 13.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 66.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 2.00 10.00 tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 100.00 90.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value 2.2 Overall Operational 0.0000 0.0836 0.0836 0.0908 0.0000 0.083743.9534 0.0910 10.7310 49.5962 0.0910 7.0183 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0200 0.0897 0.0852 0.1051 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 4,816.905 4 4,816.905 4 1.1665 0.0000 4,841.402 2 0.5759 3.2059 3.7818 0.2459 2.9961 3.2420Total22.7026 47.6266 32.8705 0.0475 0.0000 2,743.617 2 2,743.617 2 0.7470 0.0000 2,759.304 3 0.0735 2.0776 2.1510 0.0199 1.9271 1.9469201620.4217 29.9632 18.8474 0.0268 0.0000 2,073.288 2 2,073.288 2 0.4195 0.0000 2,082.097 9 0.5024 1.1283 1.6308 0.2261 1.0691 1.295120152.2809 17.6634 14.0231 0.0207 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 4,820.937 3 4,820.937 3 1.1676 0.0000 4,845.456 4 1.0276 3.2088 4.2364 0.4879 2.9989 3.4867Total22.7072 47.6694 32.8986 0.0476 0.0000 2,746.037 9 2,746.037 9 0.7477 0.0000 2,761.739 3 0.0796 2.0795 2.1590 0.0214 1.9288 1.9502201620.4246 29.9906 18.8642 0.0268 0.0000 2,074.899 4 2,074.899 4 0.4199 0.0000 2,083.717 0 0.9481 1.1293 2.0774 0.4666 1.0700 1.536620152.2826 17.6788 14.0344 0.0207 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 508.6761 508.6761 0.0203 2.7000e- 004 509.18610.4291 7.7000e- 003 0.4368 0.1145 7.1600e- 003 0.1217Total0.8306 0.5108 2.2103 5.7400e- 003 493.8953 493.8953 0.0200 494.31530.4291 6.7600e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2200e- 003 0.1207Mobile0.7326 0.4985 2.1996 5.6700e- 003 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 Energy 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 508.6761 508.6761 0.0203 2.7000e- 004 509.18610.4291 7.7000e- 003 0.4368 0.1145 7.1600e- 003 0.1217Total0.8306 0.5108 2.2103 5.7400e- 003 493.8953 493.8953 0.0200 494.31530.4291 6.7600e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2200e- 003 0.1207Mobile0.7326 0.4985 2.1996 5.6700e- 003 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 Energy 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Area0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Architectural Coatings Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Finishing/Landscaping Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Finishing/Landscaping Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Finishing/Landscaping Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Forklifts 2 6.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 4.00 226 0.29 Trenching/Utilities Excavators 1 8.00 162 0.38 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 5 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 7 Architectural Coatings Architectural Coating 1/1/2016 1/7/2016 5 90 6 Finishing/Landscaping Building Construction 1/1/2016 4/1/2016 5 66 5 Building Construction Building Construction 8/31/2015 1/1/2016 5 10 4 Trenching/Utilities Trenching 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 5 10 3 Fine Grading Grading 8/17/2015 8/28/2015 5 13 2 Rough Grading Grading 8/2/2015 8/15/2015 5 10 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Site Preparation Site Preparation 7/15/2015 8/1/2015 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Clean Paved Roads 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Architectural Coatings 1 2.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Finishing/Landscaping 5 2.00 1.00 0.00 Building Construction 5 2.00 1.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching/Utilities 1 3.00 4.00 0.00 Fine Grading 4 10.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Rough Grading 4 10.00 4.00 4.00 Site Preparation 2 5.00 4.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 142.6484 142.6484 3.5900e- 003 142.72370.0809 7.0900e- 003 0.0880 0.0219 6.5100e- 003 0.0285Total0.1928 0.4284 0.8052 1.5000e- 003 55.6818 55.6818 2.8900e- 003 55.74250.0559 4.1000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 3.7000e- 004 0.0152Worker0.1143 0.0273 0.2851 6.4000e- 004 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0250 6.6800e- 003 0.0317 7.1200e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0133Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 984.5542 984.5542 0.2939 990.72670.5303 0.8797 1.4100 0.0573 0.8093 0.8666Total1.4222 14.2999 7.4063 9.3600e- 003 984.5542 984.5542 0.2939 990.72670.8797 0.8797 0.8093 0.8093Off-Road 1.4222 14.2999 7.4063 9.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 6.5 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3.2 Site Preparation - 2015 142.6484 142.6484 3.5900e- 003 142.72370.0749 7.0900e- 003 0.0820 0.0205 6.5100e- 003 0.0270Total0.1928 0.4284 0.8052 1.5000e- 003 55.6818 55.6818 2.8900e- 003 55.74250.0515 4.1000e- 004 0.0519 0.0138 3.7000e- 004 0.0141Worker0.1143 0.0273 0.2851 6.4000e- 004 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0234 6.6800e- 003 0.0300 6.7100e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0129Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 983.6509 983.6509 0.2937 989.81780.2267 0.8789 1.1056 0.0245 0.8086 0.8331Total1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.3500e- 003 0.0000 983.6509 983.6509 0.2937 989.81780.8789 0.8789 0.8086 0.8086Off-Road 1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.3500e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.2267 0.0000 0.2267 0.0245 0.0000 0.0245Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 228.2421 228.2421 6.7200e- 003 228.38310.1437 9.5700e- 003 0.1533 0.0387 8.8000e- 003 0.0475Total0.3279 0.5848 1.1871 2.4300e- 003 111.3636 111.3636 5.7800e- 003 111.48500.1118 8.1000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.5000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2286 0.0545 0.5702 1.2800e- 003 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0250 6.6800e- 003 0.0317 7.1200e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0133Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 29.9119 29.9119 2.4000e- 004 29.91696.9700e- 003 2.0800e- 003 9.0500e- 003 1.9100e- 003 1.9100e- 003 3.8200e- 003 Hauling 0.0208 0.1292 0.0969 2.9000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.7531 0.8748 1.6279 0.4138 0.8359 1.2497Total1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.8748 0.8748 0.8359 0.8359Off-Road 1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.7531 0.0000 0.7531 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Rough Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 228.2421 228.2421 6.7200e- 003 228.38310.1762 9.5700e- 003 0.1858 0.0466 8.8000e- 003 0.0554Total0.3279 0.5848 1.1871 2.4300e- 003 111.3636 111.3636 5.7800e- 003 111.48500.1030 8.1000e- 004 0.1038 0.0275 7.5000e- 004 0.0282Worker0.2286 0.0545 0.5702 1.2800e- 003 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0234 6.6800e- 003 0.0300 6.7100e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0129Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 29.9119 29.9119 2.4000e- 004 29.91690.0498 2.0800e- 003 0.0519 0.0124 1.9100e- 003 0.0143Hauling0.0208 0.1292 0.0969 2.9000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.3219 0.8740 1.1960 0.1769 0.8351 1.0120Total1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.8740 0.8740 0.8351 0.8351Off-Road 1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3219 0.0000 0.3219 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 198.3302 198.3302 6.4800e- 003 198.46620.1368 7.4900e- 003 0.1443 0.0368 6.8900e- 003 0.0437Total0.3070 0.4556 1.0902 2.1400e- 003 111.3636 111.3636 5.7800e- 003 111.48500.1118 8.1000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.5000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2286 0.0545 0.5702 1.2800e- 003 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0250 6.6800e- 003 0.0317 7.1200e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0133Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.7528 0.8748 1.6276 0.4138 0.8359 1.2496Total1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 1,200.638 6 1,200.638 6 0.2451 1,205.786 1 0.8748 0.8748 0.8359 0.8359Off-Road 1.4120 11.9409 8.8138 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Fine Grading - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 198.3302 198.3302 6.4800e- 003 198.46620.1264 7.4900e- 003 0.1339 0.0342 6.8900e- 003 0.0411Total0.3070 0.4556 1.0902 2.1400e- 003 111.3636 111.3636 5.7800e- 003 111.48500.1030 8.1000e- 004 0.1038 0.0275 7.5000e- 004 0.0282Worker0.2286 0.0545 0.5702 1.2800e- 003 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0234 6.6800e- 003 0.0300 6.7100e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0129Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.3218 0.8740 1.1958 0.1769 0.8351 1.0120Total1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 1,199.537 0 1,199.537 0 0.2449 1,204.679 9 0.8740 0.8740 0.8351 0.8351Off-Road 1.4107 11.9300 8.8058 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3218 0.0000 0.3218 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 120.3756 120.3756 2.4300e- 003 120.42670.0585 6.9200e- 003 0.0655 0.0160 6.3600e- 003 0.0224Total0.1470 0.4175 0.6911 1.2500e- 003 33.4091 33.4091 1.7300e- 003 33.44550.0335 2.4000e- 004 0.0338 8.8900e- 003 2.2000e- 004 9.1200e- 003 Worker 0.0686 0.0164 0.1710 3.9000e- 004 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0250 6.6800e- 003 0.0317 7.1200e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0133Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 555.5551 555.5551 0.1659 559.03810.2401 0.2401 0.2209 0.2209Total0.4166 4.8648 3.4392 5.2900e- 003 555.5551 555.5551 0.1659 559.03810.2401 0.2401 0.2209 0.2209Off-Road 0.4166 4.8648 3.4392 5.2900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Trenching/Utilities - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 120.3756 120.3756 2.4300e- 003 120.42670.0543 6.9200e- 003 0.0612 0.0150 6.3600e- 003 0.0213Total0.1470 0.4175 0.6911 1.2500e- 003 33.4091 33.4091 1.7300e- 003 33.44550.0309 2.4000e- 004 0.0312 8.2500e- 003 2.2000e- 004 8.4700e- 003 Worker 0.0686 0.0164 0.1710 3.9000e- 004 86.9665 86.9665 7.0000e- 004 86.98120.0234 6.6800e- 003 0.0300 6.7100e- 003 6.1400e- 003 0.0129Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 555.0454 555.0454 0.1657 558.52520.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207Total0.4162 4.8604 3.4360 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 555.0454 555.0454 0.1657 558.52520.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207Off-Road 0.4162 4.8604 3.4360 5.2900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 44.0144 44.0144 1.3300e- 003 44.04230.0286 1.8300e- 003 0.0304 7.7100e- 003 1.6900e- 003 9.3900e- 003 Total 0.0653 0.1112 0.2441 4.8000e- 004 22.2727 22.2727 1.1600e- 003 22.29700.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.5000e- 004 6.0800e- 003 Worker 0.0457 0.0109 0.1140 2.6000e- 004 21.7416 21.7416 1.7000e- 004 21.74536.2500e- 003 1.6700e- 003 7.9200e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.5400e- 003 3.3100e- 003 Vendor 0.0196 0.1003 0.1300 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Total1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 1,191.702 1 1,191.702 1 0.3558 1,199.173 3 0.9995 0.9995 0.9195 0.9195Off-Road 1.4538 14.3777 8.2983 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2015 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 44.0144 44.0144 1.3300e- 003 44.04230.0265 1.8300e- 003 0.0283 7.1800e- 003 1.6900e- 003 8.8600e- 003 Total 0.0653 0.1112 0.2441 4.8000e- 004 22.2727 22.2727 1.1600e- 003 22.29700.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.5000e- 004 5.6500e- 003 Worker 0.0457 0.0109 0.1140 2.6000e- 004 21.7416 21.7416 1.7000e- 004 21.74535.8400e- 003 1.6700e- 003 7.5100e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.5400e- 003 3.2100e- 003 Vendor 0.0196 0.1003 0.1300 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.0000 1,190.608 8 1,190.608 8 0.3555 1,198.073 1 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Off-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 42.9944 42.9944 1.2300e- 003 43.02010.0286 1.5500e- 003 0.0301 7.7100e- 003 1.4100e- 003 9.1200e- 003 Total 0.0607 0.0984 0.2263 4.7000e- 004 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Worker 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 21.5030 21.5030 1.6000e- 004 21.50646.2500e- 003 1.3900e- 003 7.6300e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.2700e- 003 3.0500e- 003 Vendor 0.0179 0.0885 0.1228 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Total1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Off-Road 1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 42.9944 42.9944 1.2300e- 003 43.02010.0265 1.5500e- 003 0.0280 7.1800e- 003 1.4100e- 003 8.5900e- 003 Total 0.0607 0.0984 0.2263 4.7000e- 004 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Worker 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 21.5030 21.5030 1.6000e- 004 21.50645.8400e- 003 1.3900e- 003 7.2200e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.2700e- 003 2.9500e- 003 Vendor 0.0179 0.0885 0.1228 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Off-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 42.9944 42.9944 1.2300e- 003 43.02010.0286 1.5500e- 003 0.0301 7.7100e- 003 1.4100e- 003 9.1200e- 003 Total 0.0607 0.0984 0.2263 4.7000e- 004 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Worker 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 21.5030 21.5030 1.6000e- 004 21.50646.2500e- 003 1.3900e- 003 7.6300e- 003 1.7800e- 003 1.2700e- 003 3.0500e- 003 Vendor 0.0179 0.0885 0.1228 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Total1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 1,178.554 9 1,178.554 9 0.3555 1,186.020 2 0.9398 0.9398 0.8646 0.8646Off-Road 1.3816 13.7058 8.2122 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.7 Finishing/Landscaping - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 5,543; Non-Residential Outdoor: 1,848 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 42.9944 42.9944 1.2300e- 003 43.02010.0265 1.5500e- 003 0.0280 7.1800e- 003 1.4100e- 003 8.5900e- 003 Total 0.0607 0.0984 0.2263 4.7000e- 004 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Worker 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 21.5030 21.5030 1.6000e- 004 21.50645.8400e- 003 1.3900e- 003 7.2200e- 003 1.6800e- 003 1.2700e- 003 2.9500e- 003 Vendor 0.0179 0.0885 0.1228 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.0000 1,177.473 6 1,177.473 6 0.3552 1,184.932 1 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Off-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Total 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0224 1.6000e- 004 0.0225 5.9300e- 003 1.4000e- 004 6.0700e- 003 Worker 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.14490.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966Total17.4971 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0332 282.14490.1966 0.1966 0.1966 0.1966Off-Road 0.3685 2.3722 1.8839 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 17.1286 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coatings - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Total 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 21.4914 21.4914 1.0700e- 003 21.51380.0206 1.6000e- 004 0.0208 5.5000e- 003 1.4000e- 004 5.6400e- 003 Worker 0.0429 9.8600e- 003 0.1034 2.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0332 281.88600.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964Total17.4968 2.3701 1.8822 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0332 281.88600.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964Off-Road 0.3681 2.3701 1.8822 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 17.1286 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.002141 0.004713 0.000509 0.002239 MH 0.511008 0.057223 0.191597 0.152361 0.041328 0.005882 0.015289 0.014281 0.001428 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUSLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 4.4 Fleet Mix H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 47.56 16.13 6.61 158,965 158,965 Annual VMT High School 47.56 16.13 6.61 158,965 158,965 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 493.8953 493.8953 0.0200 494.31530.4291 6.7600e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2200e- 003 0.1207Unmitigated0.7326 0.4985 2.1996 5.6700e- 003 493.8953 493.8953 0.0200 494.31530.4291 6.7600e- 003 0.4359 0.1145 6.2200e- 003 0.1207Mitigated0.7326 0.4985 2.1996 5.6700e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.8700 Total 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 High School 125.63 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 NaturalGas Unmitigated 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.87009.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 NaturalGas Mitigated 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unmitigated0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Mitigated0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.8700 6.0 Area Detail 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.8700 Total 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day High School 0.12563 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO Mitigated 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0732 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0235 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Total0.0967 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 8.1000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Landscaping4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0732 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0235 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number OPERATIONAL RESULTS – UNMITIGATED RUN CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) High School 3.69 1000sqft 0.08 3,695.00 0 Population High School 450.00 Student 0.10 4,500.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 2:33 PM Servite HS Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 4.80 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 82.13 2.30 tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.37 0.10 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,690.00 3,695.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 59,697.44 4,500.00 Solid Waste - 2.3 tons SW from 52 stadium evets/year Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Aquatic center and Baseball Building Construction Phase - abc Vehicle Trips - trip generation for aquatic center bleachers Water And Wastewater - Indoor water use for pool includes water reuired to replace the whole water from the pool once a year and water usage/52 events/year tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.25 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 12.89 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.61 0.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.79 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.37 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 5,097,168.00 0.00 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,982,232.00 677,682.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 315,064.60 0.00 tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt 2.21 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 122,525.12 0.00 tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt 2.21 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.71 0.00 tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 0.0000 0.1091 0.1091 0.0000 0.0000 0.109038.9961 0.1319 10.0295 45.7944 0.1377 5.9952 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 9.1870e- 003 0.1175 0.1062 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 9.5431 9.5431 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 9.58221.5800e- 003 7.5700e- 003 9.1500e- 003 5.8000e- 004 7.2500e- 003 7.8400e- 003 Total 0.1088 0.1020 0.0752 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 9.5431 9.5431 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 9.58221.5800e- 003 7.5700e- 003 9.1500e- 003 5.8000e- 004 7.2500e- 003 7.8400e- 003 2014 0.1088 0.1020 0.0752 1.1000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 9.5535 9.5535 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 9.59262.5900e- 003 7.5800e- 003 0.0102 1.0700e- 003 7.2600e- 003 8.3400e- 003 Total 0.1089 0.1021 0.0753 1.1000e- 004 0.0000 9.5535 9.5535 1.8600e- 003 0.0000 9.59262.5900e- 003 7.5800e- 003 0.0102 1.0700e- 003 7.2600e- 003 8.3400e- 003 2014 0.1089 0.1021 0.0753 1.1000e- 004 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction 0.7066 57.9091 58.6158 0.0309 7.9000e- 004 59.51220.0382 6.4000e- 004 0.0389 0.0101 6.2000e- 004 0.0108Total0.0942 0.0213 0.1853 4.8000e- 004 0.2398 2.5252 2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 2.95340.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 0.4669 0.0000 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 1.04630.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 33.7407 33.7407 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 33.77210.0382 2.4000e- 004 0.0385 0.0101 2.2000e- 004 0.0104Mobile0.0540 0.0162 0.1752 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 21.6320 21.6320 8.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 21.72843.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 Energy 5.5000e- 004 4.9900e- 003 4.1900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Area 0.0397 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.7066 57.9091 58.6158 0.0309 8.0000e- 004 59.51260.0382 6.4000e- 004 0.0389 0.0101 6.2000e- 004 0.0108Total0.0942 0.0213 0.1853 4.8000e- 004 0.2398 2.5252 2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 2.95380.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 0.4669 0.0000 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 1.04630.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 33.7407 33.7407 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 33.77210.0382 2.4000e- 004 0.0385 0.0101 2.2000e- 004 0.0104Mobile0.0540 0.0162 0.1752 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 21.6320 21.6320 8.5000e- 004 2.5000e- 004 21.72843.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 Energy 5.5000e- 004 4.9900e- 003 4.1900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Area 0.0397 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 5 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/22/2014 1/28/2014 5 2 4 Fine Grading Grading 1/18/2014 1/21/2014 5 2 3 Rough Grading Grading 1/16/2014 1/17/2014 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/15/2014 1/15/2014 5 1 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 1/14/2014 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.2500 6.3852e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.4760 5.4760 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 5.49994.6500e- 003 4.6500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 Total 7.4600e- 003 0.0625 0.0443 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.4760 5.4760 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 5.49994.6500e- 003 4.6500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 7.4600e- 003 0.0625 0.0443 6.0000e- 005 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Acres of Grading: 0.5 ROG NOx CO Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Fine Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 Rough Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 0.0000 5.4695 5.4695 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 5.49344.6500e- 003 4.6500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 Total 7.4600e- 003 0.0624 0.0442 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.4695 5.4695 1.1400e- 003 0.0000 5.49344.6500e- 003 4.6500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 4.4500e- 003 Off-Road 7.4600e- 003 0.0624 0.0442 6.0000e- 005 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.5316 0.5316 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53225.5000e- 004 0.0000 5.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 Total 1.0700e- 003 3.1000e- 004 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5316 0.5316 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53225.5000e- 004 0.0000 5.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 Worker 1.0700e- 003 3.1000e- 004 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.4514 0.4514 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.45422.7000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 7.2000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.4000e- 004 Total 7.2000e- 004 7.2400e- 003 3.7000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.4514 0.4514 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.45424.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 Off-Road 7.2000e- 004 7.2400e- 003 3.7000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00002.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.7000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.5316 0.5316 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53225.5000e- 004 0.0000 5.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 Total 1.0700e- 003 3.1000e- 004 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5316 0.5316 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53225.5000e- 004 0.0000 5.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 Worker 1.0700e- 003 3.1000e- 004 3.2300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.4509 0.4509 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.45371.1000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 5.6000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.1000e- 004 4.2000e- 004 Total 7.2000e- 004 7.2300e- 003 3.6900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.4509 0.4509 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.45374.5000e- 004 4.5000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 Off-Road 7.2000e- 004 7.2300e- 003 3.6900e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00001.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1.0952 1.0952 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.10007.5000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 1.6800e- 003 4.1000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 1.3000e- 003 Total 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0952 1.0952 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.10009.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 Off-Road 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00007.5000e- 004 0.0000 7.5000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1.0939 1.0939 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.09873.2000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 1.8000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 1.0700e- 003 Total 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0939 1.0939 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.09879.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 Off-Road 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00003.2000e- 004 0.0000 3.2000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Total 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Worker 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.0952 1.0952 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.10007.5000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 1.6800e- 003 4.1000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 1.3000e- 003 Total 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0952 1.0952 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.10009.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 Off-Road 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00007.5000e- 004 0.0000 7.5000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 4.1000e- 004 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Fine Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Total 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Worker 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.0939 1.0939 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.09873.2000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 1.2500e- 003 1.8000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 1.0700e- 003 Total 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0939 1.0939 2.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.09879.3000e- 004 9.3000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 8.9000e- 004 Off-Road 1.4900e- 003 0.0125 8.8400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00003.2000e- 004 0.0000 3.2000e- 004 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 1.8000e- 004 Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Total 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Worker 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.64026.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 Total 0.0961 6.9400e- 003 4.8000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6383 0.6383 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.64026.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 Off-Road 1.1200e- 003 6.9400e- 003 4.8000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0950 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Total 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.1063 0.1063 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.10641.1000e- 004 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 Worker 2.1000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 6.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.6376 0.6376 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63956.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 Total 0.0961 6.9400e- 003 4.8000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6376 0.6376 9.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.63956.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 6.1000e- 004 Off-Road 1.1100e- 003 6.9400e- 003 4.8000e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.0950 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 33.7407 33.7407 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 33.77210.0382 2.4000e- 004 0.0385 0.0101 2.2000e- 004 0.0104Unmitigated0.0540 0.0162 0.1752 4.5000e- 004 0.0000 33.7407 33.7407 1.5000e- 003 0.0000 33.77210.0382 2.4000e- 004 0.0385 0.0101 2.2000e- 004 0.0104Mitigated0.0540 0.0162 0.1752 4.5000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Total 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0266 0.0266 0.0000 0.0000 0.02663.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.000000 0.006039 0.000062 0.000000 MH 0.654728 0.073317 0.245483 0.020197 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000174 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUSLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 4.4 Fleet Mix 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 0.00 167.87 0.00 102,417 102,417 High School 0.00 0.00 0.00 High School 0.00 0.00 0.00 High School 0.00 166.50 0.00 101,584 101,584 Annual VMT High School 0.00 1.37 0.00 833 833 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 5.46013.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.4271 5.4271 1.1000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 2.9801 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 2.9982 Total 5.5000e- 004 4.9900e- 003 4.1900e- 003 2.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.9801 2.4619 High School 55845 3.0000e- 004 2.7400e- 003 2.3000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.4470 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 High School 45854.9 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 5.4271 5.4271 1.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.46013.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 NaturalGas Unmitigated 5.5000e- 004 4.9900e- 003 4.1900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.4271 5.4271 1.0000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.46013.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 NaturalGas Mitigated 5.5000e- 004 4.9900e- 003 4.1900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 16.2049 16.2049 7.4000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 16.26830.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 16.2049 16.2049 7.4000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 16.26830.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Electricity Mitigated NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N 16.2683Total16.2049 7.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 7.3351 High School 31095 8.8984 4.1000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 8.9332 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr High School 25532.5 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 5.4601 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 3.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.4271 5.4271 1.1000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 3.0000e- 005 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 3.8000e- 004 2.9801 6.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 2.9982 Total 5.5000e- 004 4.9900e- 003 4.1900e- 003 2.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 2.1000e- 004 0.0000 2.9801 2.4619 High School 55845 3.0000e- 004 2.7400e- 003 2.3000e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.1000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 2.4470 2.4470 5.0000e- 005 4.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr High School 45854.9 2.5000e- 004 2.2500e- 003 1.8900e- 003 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Unmitigated 0.0397 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Mitigated 0.0397 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 16.2683 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Total 16.2049 7.5000e- 004 1.5000e- 004 7.3351 High School 31095 8.8984 4.1000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 8.9332 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr High School 25532.5 7.3065 3.4000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 Mitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Total 0.0397 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Landscaping 5.8000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0296 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 9.5000e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Total 0.0397 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0113 0.0113 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.01192.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 Landscaping 5.8000e- 004 6.0000e- 005 5.9400e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.0296 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 9.5000e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 2.9538Total2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 0.0000 High School 0.677682 / 0 2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 2.9538 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr High School 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.5000e- 004 2.9538 Category t o n MT/yr Mitigated 2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 2.9534 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 1.0463 t o n MT/yr Mitigated 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 1.0463 2.9534 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Total 2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 High School 0.677682 / 0 2.7649 9.4000e- 004 5.4000e- 004 2.9534 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr High School 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Mitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 1.0463 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Total 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 0.0000 High School 2.3 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 1.0463 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr High School 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0463 Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Total 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 0.0000 High School 2.3 0.4669 0.0276 0.0000 1.0463 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr High School 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Solid Waste - 2.3 tons SW from 52 stadium evets/year 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Aquatic center and Baseball Building Construction Phase - abc Vehicle Trips - trip generation for aquatic center bleachers Water And Wastewater - Indoor water use for pool includes water reuired to replace the whole water from the pool once a year and water usage/52 events/year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) High School 3.69 1000sqft 0.08 3,695.00 0 Population High School 450.00 Student 0.10 4,500.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 2:32 PM Servite HS Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 4.80 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 82.13 2.30 tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.37 0.10 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,690.00 3,695.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 59,697.44 4,500.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,982,232.00 677,682.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 315,064.60 0.00 tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt 2.21 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 122,525.12 0.00 tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt 2.21 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.71 0.00 tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.25 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 12.89 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.61 0.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.79 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.37 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 5,097,168.00 0.00 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00 0.0000 0.0833 0.0833 0.0908 0.0000 0.083449.8485 0.0913 24.0453 53.4234 0.0920 17.8117 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 1.0662e- 003 0.0916 0.0853 0.0746 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,328.043 1 1,328.043 1 0.2970 0.0000 1,334.27980.4336 0.9304 1.3640 0.2065 0.8903 1.0969Total38.4522 14.4960 9.5133 0.0134 0.0000 1,328.043 1 1,328.043 1 0.2970 0.0000 1,334.27980.4336 0.9304 1.3640 0.2065 0.8903 1.0969201438.4522 14.4960 9.5133 0.0134 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,329.150 7 1,329.150 7 0.2973 0.0000 1,335.39300.8645 0.9313 1.7958 0.4434 0.8912 1.3346Total38.4526 14.5093 9.5214 0.0134 0.0000 1,329.150 7 1,329.150 7 0.2973 0.0000 1,335.39300.8645 0.9313 1.7958 0.4434 0.8912 1.3346201438.4526 14.5093 9.5214 0.0134 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 1,522.806 4 1,522.806 4 0.0644 6.0000e- 004 1,524.34531.4965 0.0114 1.5079 0.3967 0.0107 0.4074Total2.2010 0.5832 7.0034 0.0180 1,489.927 1 1,489.927 1 0.0635 1,491.26061.4965 9.1400e- 003 1.5056 0.3967 8.4200e- 003 0.4051Mobile1.9791 0.5554 6.9330 0.0179 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.97952.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 Energy 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Area 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,522.806 4 1,522.806 4 0.0644 6.0000e- 004 1,524.34531.4965 0.0114 1.5079 0.3967 0.0107 0.4074Total2.2010 0.5832 7.0034 0.0180 1,489.927 1 1,489.927 1 0.0635 1,491.26061.4965 9.1400e- 003 1.5056 0.3967 8.4200e- 003 0.4051Mobile1.9791 0.5554 6.9330 0.0179 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.97952.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 Energy 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Area 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 5 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/22/2014 1/28/2014 5 2 4 Fine Grading Grading 1/18/2014 1/21/2014 5 2 3 Rough Grading Grading 1/16/2014 1/17/2014 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/15/2014 1/15/2014 5 1 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 1/14/2014 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904Total1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Acres of Grading: 0.5 ROG NOx CO Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Fine Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 Rough Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Total0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 995.1971 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.37300.5303 0.8920 1.4223 0.0573 0.8206 0.8779Total1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 995.1971 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.37300.8920 0.8920 0.8206 0.8206Off-Road 1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Total0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 994.2841 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.45430.2267 0.8912 1.1179 0.0245 0.8199 0.8444Total1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 0.0000 994.2841 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.45430.8912 0.8912 0.8199 0.8199Off-Road 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.2267 0.0000 0.2267 0.0245 0.0000 0.0245Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 60.9519 60.9519 3.1600e- 003 61.01830.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152Total0.1010 0.0276 0.3343 6.8000e- 004 60.9519 60.9519 3.1600e- 003 61.01830.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152Worker0.1010 0.0276 0.3343 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.7528 0.9304 1.6832 0.4138 0.8904 1.3041Total1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.0000 0.00000.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 60.9519 60.9519 3.1600e- 003 61.01830.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152Total0.1010 0.0276 0.3343 6.8000e- 004 60.9519 60.9519 3.1600e- 003 61.01830.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152Worker0.1010 0.0276 0.3343 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.3218 0.9296 1.2514 0.1769 0.8895 1.0664Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3218 0.0000 0.3218 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Total0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.7528 0.9304 1.6832 0.4138 0.8904 1.3041Total1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.0000 0.00000.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Fine Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Total0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.3218 0.9296 1.2514 0.1769 0.8895 1.0664Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.0000 0.00000.3218 0.0000 0.3218 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769Fugitive Dust NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Total0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 281.4481 281.4481 0.0401 282.29050.2452 0.2452 0.2452 0.2452Total38.4324 2.7773 1.9216 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0401 282.29050.2452 0.2452 0.2452 0.2452Off-Road 0.4462 2.7773 1.9216 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 37.9861 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Total0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 121.9038 121.9038 6.3200e- 003 122.03660.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304Worker0.2020 0.0551 0.6687 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0401 282.03150.2449 0.2449 0.2449 0.2449Total38.4320 2.7748 1.9198 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0401 282.03150.2449 0.2449 0.2449 0.2449Off-Road 0.4458 2.7748 1.9198 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 37.9861 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 12.1904 12.1904 6.3000e- 004 12.20370.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 Total 0.0202 5.5100e- 003 0.0669 1.4000e- 004 12.1904 12.1904 6.3000e- 004 12.20370.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 Worker 0.0202 5.5100e- 003 0.0669 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,489.927 1 1,489.927 1 0.0635 1,491.26061.4965 9.1400e- 003 1.5056 0.3967 8.4200e- 003 0.4051Unmitigated1.9791 0.5554 6.9330 0.0179 1,489.927 1 1,489.927 1 0.0635 1,491.26061.4965 9.1400e- 003 1.5056 0.3967 8.4200e- 003 0.4051Mitigated1.9791 0.5554 6.9330 0.0179 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 12.1904 12.1904 6.3000e- 004 12.20370.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 Total 0.0202 5.5100e- 003 0.0669 1.4000e- 004 12.1904 12.1904 6.3000e- 004 12.20370.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 Worker 0.0202 5.5100e- 003 0.0669 1.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.97952.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 NaturalGas Unmitigated 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.97952.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 NaturalGas Mitigated 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.000000 0.006039 0.000062 0.000000 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N MH 0.654728 0.073317 0.245483 0.020197 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 0.000174 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUSLDALDT1LDT2MDVLHD1LHD2 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 4.4 Fleet Mix 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 0.00 167.87 0.00 102,417 102,417 High School 0.00 0.00 0.00 High School 0.00 0.00 0.00 High School 0.00 166.50 0.00 101,584 101,584 Annual VMT High School 0.00 1.37 0.00 833 833 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 32.97952.0800e- 003 32.7800 32.7800 6.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.8700 Total 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 18.1095 High School 0.12563 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 1.1400e- 003 18.0000 18.0000 3.4000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 9.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day High School 0.153 1.6500e- 003 0.0150 0.0126 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 32.9795 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 2.0800e- 003 32.7800 32.7800 6.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 18.0000 3.4000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 18.1095 Total 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 18.0000 14.8700 High School 153 1.6500e- 003 0.0150 0.0126 9.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 High School 125.63 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Unmitigated 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Mitigated 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Total 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Landscaping 4.6300e- 003 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.1623 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0520 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Total 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 Landscaping 4.6300e- 003 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 0.1623 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.0520 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2 Page 1 of 1 Date: 8/8/2013 2:31 PM Servite HS Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population High School 450.00 Student 0.10 4,500.00 0 High School 3.69 1000sqft 0.08 3,695.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days)30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2016 Utility Company Southern California Edison CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Land Use - Aquatic center and Baseball Building Construction Phase - abc Vehicle Trips - trip generation for aquatic center bleachers Water And Wastewater - Indoor water use for pool includes water reuired to replace the whole water from the pool once a year and water usage/52 events/yearSolid Waste - 2.3 tons SW from 52 stadium evets/year Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblConstDustMitigation CleanPavedRoadPercentReduction 0 9 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 3,690.00 3,695.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 59,697.44 4,500.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 1.37 0.10 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2016 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 4.80 0.00 tblSolidWaste SolidWasteGenerationRate 82.13 2.30 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF HHD 0.01 0.00 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF LDA 0.51 0.65 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT1 0.06 0.07 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LDT2 0.19 0.25 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD1 0.04 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF LHD2 5.8820e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF MCY 4.7130e-003 6.0390e-003 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MDV 0.15 0.02 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MH 2.2390e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF MHD 0.02 0.00 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF OBUS 1.4280e-003 1.7400e-004 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF SBUS 5.0900e-004 6.2000e-005 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleEF UBUS 2.1410e-003 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 4.37 0.00 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 0.61 0.37 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.79 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 0.25 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 12.89 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.71 0.00 tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 tblWater AerobicPercent 87.46 100.00 tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt 2.21 0.00 tblWater AnaerobicandFacultativeLagoonsPerce nt 2.21 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 122,525.12 0.00 tblWater IndoorWaterUseRate 1,982,232.00 677,682.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 315,064.60 0.00 tblWater OutdoorWaterUseRate 5,097,168.00 0.00 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00 tblWater SepticTankPercent 10.33 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2014 38.4568 14.5120 9.4860 0.0133 0.8645 0.9313 1.7958 0.4434 0.8912 1.3346 0.0000 1,322.703 4 1,322.703 4 0.2973 0.0000 1,328.9457 Total 38.4568 14.5120 9.4860 0.0133 0.2973 0.0000 1,328.94570.8645 0.9313 1.7958 0.4434 0.8912 1.3346 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1,322.703 4 1,322.703 4 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 2014 38.4564 14.4988 9.4778 0.0133 0.4336 0.9304 1.3640 0.2065 0.8903 1.0969 0.0000 1,321.595 8 1,321.595 8 0.2970 0.0000 1,327.8324 Total 38.4564 14.4988 9.4778 0.0133 0.4336 0.9304 1.3640 0.2065 0.8903 1.0969 0.0000 1,321.595 8 1,321.595 8 0.2970 0.0000 1,327.8324 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 1.0661e- 003 0.0916 0.0856 0.0750 0.0908 0.0000 0.083849.8485 0.0913 24.0453 53.4234 0.0920 17.8117 0.0000 0.0837 0.0837 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Area 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.1052 Energy 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.9795 Mobile 2.3429 0.6098 6.6347 0.0169 1.4965 9.1500e- 003 1.5057 0.3968 8.4200e- 003 0.4052 1,411.502 2 1,411.502 2 0.0635 1,412.8363 Total 2.5648 0.6375 6.7051 0.0171 0.0644 6.0000e- 004 1,445.92101.4965 0.0114 1.5079 0.3968 0.0107 0.4074 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,444.381 5 1,444.381 5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Area 0.2189 0.0005 0.0475 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 0.0002 1.7000e- 004 0.0002 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.1052 Energy 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.9795 Mobile 2.3429 0.6098 6.6347 0.0169 1.4965 9.1500e- 003 1.5057 0.3968 8.4200e- 003 0.4052 1,411.502 2 1,411.502 2 0.0635 1,412.8363 Total 2.5648 0.6375 6.7051 0.0171 1.4965 0.0114 1.5079 0.3968 0.0107 0.4074 1,444.381 5 1,444.381 5 0.0644 6.0000e- 004 1,445.9210 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 1/1/2014 1/14/2014 5 10 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 1/15/2014 1/15/2014 5 1 4 Fine Grading Grading 1/18/2014 1/21/2014 5 2 3 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 1/22/2014 1/28/2014 5 2Rough Grading Grading 1/16/2014 1/17/2014 5 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor 5 Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Rough Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Rough Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Rough Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Fine Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 6.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Fine Grading Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Fine Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 1.00 255 0.40 Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Site Preparation 2 5.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix Fine Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 Rough Grading 4 10.00 0.00 0.00 HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Architectural Coating 1 1.00 0.00 Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Demolition - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0.5 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.5281 Total 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 1,207.246 9 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.58930.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 115.4565 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.4157 Total 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895 0.0000 1,206.139 3 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.58930.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 115.4565 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Grading: 0 ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Dust 0.5303 0.0000 0.5303 0.0573 0.0000 0.0573 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 0.8920 0.8920 0.8206 0.8206 995.1971 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.3730 Total 1.4341 14.4817 7.3936 9.3700e- 003 995.1971 0.2941 1,001.37300.5303 0.8920 1.4223 0.0573 0.8206 0.8779 995.1971 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1224 0.0303 0.3166 6.4000e- 004 0.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 57.7283 57.7283 3.1600e- 003 57.7946 Total 0.1224 0.0303 0.3166 6.4000e- 004 57.7283 3.1600e- 003 57.79460.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 57.7283 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Dust 0.2267 0.0000 0.2267 0.0245 0.0000 0.0245 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 0.8912 0.8912 0.8199 0.8199 0.0000 994.2841 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.4543 Total 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.3600e- 003 994.2841 0.2938 1,000.45430.2267 0.8912 1.1179 0.0245 0.8199 0.8444 0.0000 994.2841 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.1224 0.0303 0.3166 6.4000e- 004 0.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 57.7283 57.7283 3.1600e- 003 57.7946 Total 0.1224 0.0303 0.3166 6.4000e- 004 3.1600e- 003 57.79460.0559 4.3000e- 004 0.0563 0.0148 4.0000e- 004 0.0152 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 57.7283 57.7283 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.5281 Total 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.2515 1,212.52810.7528 0.9304 1.6832 0.4138 0.8904 1.3041 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 6.3200e- 003 115.58930.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 115.4565 115.4565 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Fugitive Dust 0.3218 0.0000 0.3218 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.4157 Total 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.2513 1,211.41570.3218 0.9296 1.2514 0.1769 0.8895 1.0664 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.58930.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 115.4565 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 3.5 Fine Grading - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site Acres of Paving: 0 ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Dust 0.7528 0.0000 0.7528 0.4138 0.0000 0.4138 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 0.9304 0.9304 0.8904 0.8904 1,207.246 9 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.5281 Total 1.4929 12.4922 8.8528 0.0121 1,207.246 9 0.2515 1,212.52810.7528 0.9304 1.6832 0.4138 0.8904 1.3041 1,207.246 9 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.58930.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 115.4565 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive Dust 0.3218 0.0000 0.3218 0.1769 0.0000 0.1769 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895 0.0000 1,206.139 3 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.4157 Total 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.0120 1,206.139 3 0.2513 1,211.41570.3218 0.9296 1.2514 0.1769 0.8895 1.0664 0.0000 1,206.139 3 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 0.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 115.4565 115.4565 6.3200e- 003 115.5893 Total 0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.2900e- 003 6.3200e- 003 115.58930.1118 8.7000e- 004 0.1126 0.0296 7.9000e- 004 0.0304 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 115.4565 115.4565 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2014 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Archit. Coating 37.9861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4462 2.7773 1.9216 2.9700e- 003 0.2452 0.2452 0.2452 0.2452 281.4481 281.4481 0.0401 282.2905 Total 38.4324 2.7773 1.9216 2.9700e- 003 0.0401 282.29050.2452 0.2452 0.2452 0.2452 281.4481 281.4481 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0245 6.0600e- 003 0.0633 1.3000e- 004 0.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 11.5457 11.5457 6.3000e- 004 11.5589 Total 0.0245 6.0600e- 003 0.0633 1.3000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 11.55890.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 11.5457 11.5457 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Archit. Coating 37.9861 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.4458 2.7748 1.9198 2.9700e- 003 0.2449 0.2449 0.2449 0.2449 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 0.0401 282.0315 Total 38.4320 2.7748 1.9198 2.9700e- 003 0.0401 282.03150.2449 0.2449 0.2449 0.2449 0.0000 281.1898 281.1898 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0245 6.0600e- 003 0.0633 1.3000e- 004 0.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 11.5457 11.5457 6.3000e- 004 11.5589 Total 0.0245 6.0600e- 003 0.0633 1.3000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 11.55890.0112 9.0000e- 005 0.0113 2.9600e- 003 8.0000e- 005 3.0400e- 003 CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 11.5457 11.5457 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROG NOx NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Mitigated 2.3429 0.6098 6.6347 0.0169 1.4965 9.1500e- 003 1.5057 0.3968 8.4200e- 003 0.4052 1,411.502 2 1,411.502 2 0.0635 1,412.8363 Unmitigated 2.3429 0.6098 6.6347 0.0169 1.4965 9.1500e- 003 1.5057 0.3968 8.4200e- 003 0.4052 1,411.502 2 1,411.502 2 0.0635 1,412.8363 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT High School 0.00 1.37 0.00 833 833 High School 0.00 166.50 0.00 101,584 101,584 High School 0.00 0.00 0.00 High School 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 0.00 167.87 0.00 102,417 102,417 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 High School 16.60 8.40 6.90 77.80 17.20 5.00 75 19 6 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS 5.0 Energy Detail Historical Energy Use: N MH 0.654728 0.073317 0.245830 0.020197 0.000000 0.000000 0.000000 SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.000000 0.006039 0.000062 0.0000000.000000 0.000174 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROG NOx CO NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total NaturalGas Mitigated 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.9795 NaturalGas Unmitigated 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 32.7800 32.7800 6.3000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.97952.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 High School 125.63 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.8700 High School 153 1.6500e- 003 0.0150 0.0126 9.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 18.0000 18.0000 3.4000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 18.1095 Total 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 1.6000e- 004 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 32.7800 32.7800 6.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 32.9795 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day High School 0.153 1.6500e- 003 0.0150 0.0126 9.0000e- 005 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 1.1400e- 003 18.0000 18.0000 3.4000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 18.1095 High School 0.12563 1.3500e- 003 0.0123 0.0104 7.0000e- 005 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 9.4000e- 004 14.7800 14.7800 2.8000e- 004 2.7000e- 004 14.8700 Total 3.0000e- 003 0.0273 0.0230 32.7800 32.7800 6.2000e- 004 6.0000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 2.0800e- 003 32.9795 NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Mitigated 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.1052 Unmitigated 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0993 0.0993 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Architectural Coating 0.0520 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1623 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.6300e- 003 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.1052 Total 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 2.8000e- 004 0.10521.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 Architectural Coating 0.0520 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.1623 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 4.6300e- 003 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.1052 Total 0.2189 4.6000e- 004 0.0475 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 1.7000e- 004 0.0993 0.0993 2.8000e- 004 0.1052 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type 10.0 Vegetation LST SPREADSHEET SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 2.00 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 4 2 NOx 115 Graders 0.5 0 CO 715 Dozers 0.5 0 PM10 6 Scrapers 1 0 PM2.5 4 Acres 2.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 2 115 114 125 148 205 2 115 114 125 148 205 115 114 125 148 205 CO 2 715 1041 1547 2685 7493 2 715 1041 1547 2685 7493 715 1041 1547 2685 7493 PM10 2 6 19 35 68 166 2 6 19 35 68 166 6 19 35 68 166 PM2.5 2 4 6 11 25 92 2 4 6 11 25 92 4 6 11 25 92 Central Orange County 2.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 115 114 125 148 205 CO 715 1041 1547 2685 7493 PM10 6 19 35 68 166 PM2.5 4 6 11 25 92 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 2 17 2 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.00 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 2 1 NOx 81 Graders 0.5 0 CO 485 Dozers 0.5 0 PM10 4 Scrapers 1 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 1 81 83 98 123 192 81 83 98 123 192 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 1 4 12 28 60 158 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 1 3 4 9 22 85 3 4 9 22 85 Central Orange County 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 81 83 98 123 192 CO 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 3 4 9 22 85 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 1 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.00 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 2 1 NOx 81 Graders 0.5 0 CO 485 Dozers 0.5 0 PM10 4 Scrapers 1 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 1 81 83 98 123 192 81 83 98 123 192 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 1 4 12 28 60 158 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 1 3 4 9 22 85 3 4 9 22 85 Central Orange County 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 81 83 98 123 192 CO 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 3 4 9 22 85 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 1 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.50 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 2 1 NOx 98 Graders 0.5 0 CO 600 Dozers 0.5 1 0.5 PM10 5 Scrapers 1 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.50 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 2 115 114 125 148 205 98 99 112 136 199 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 2 715 1041 1547 2685 7493 600 897 1338 2397 7167 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 2 6 19 35 68 166 5 16 32 64 162 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 2 4 6 11 25 92 4 5 10 24 89 Central Orange County 1.50 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 98 99 112 136 199 CO 600 897 1338 2397 7167 PM10 5 16 32 64 162 PM2.5 4 5 10 24 89 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 2 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.50 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 2 1 NOx 98 Graders 0.5 0 0 CO 600 Dozers 0.5 1 0.5 PM10 5 Scrapers 1 0 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.50 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 2 115 114 125 148 205 98 99 112 136 199 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 2 715 1041 1547 2685 7493 600 897 1338 2397 7167 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 2 6 19 35 68 166 5 16 32 64 162 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 2 4 6 11 25 92 4 5 10 24 89 Central Orange County 1.50 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 98 99 112 136 199 CO 600 897 1338 2397 7167 PM10 5 16 32 64 162 PM2.5 4 5 10 24 89 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 2 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.00 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 2 1 NOx 81 Graders 0.5 0 CO 485 Dozers 0.5 0 PM10 4 Scrapers 1 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 1 81 83 98 123 192 81 83 98 123 192 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 1 4 12 28 60 158 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 1 3 4 9 22 85 3 4 9 22 85 Central Orange County 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 81 83 98 123 192 CO 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 3 4 9 22 85 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 1 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.50 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 2 1 NOx 98 Graders 0.5 0 0 CO 600 Dozers 0.5 1 0.5 PM10 5 Scrapers 1 0 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.50 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 2 115 114 125 148 205 98 99 112 136 199 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 2 715 1041 1547 2685 7493 600 897 1338 2397 7167 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 2 6 19 35 68 166 5 16 32 64 162 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 2 4 6 11 25 92 4 5 10 24 89 Central Orange County 1.50 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 98 99 112 136 199 CO 600 897 1338 2397 7167 PM10 5 16 32 64 162 PM2.5 4 5 10 24 89 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 2 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.00 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 1 0.5 NOx 81 Graders 0.5 1 0.5 CO 485 Dozers 0.5 0 0 PM10 4 Scrapers 1 0 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 1 81 83 98 123 192 81 83 98 123 192 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 1 4 12 28 60 158 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 1 3 4 9 22 85 3 4 9 22 85 Central Orange County 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 81 83 98 123 192 CO 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 3 4 9 22 85 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 1 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds SRA No.Acres Source Receptor Distance (meters)Source Receptor Distance (Feet) 17 1.00 25 82 Source Receptor Central Orange County Equipment Acres/8-hr Day Equipment Used Acres Distance (meters)25 Tractors 0.5 2 1 NOx 81 Graders 0.5 0 CO 485 Dozers 0.5 0 PM10 4 Scrapers 1 0 PM2.5 3 Acres 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 1 81 83 98 123 192 1 81 83 98 123 192 81 83 98 123 192 CO 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 1 485 753 1128 2109 6841 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 1 4 12 28 60 158 1 4 12 28 60 158 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 1 3 4 9 22 85 1 3 4 9 22 85 3 4 9 22 85 Central Orange County 1.00 Acres 25 50 100 200 500 NOx 81 83 98 123 192 CO 485 753 1128 2109 6841 PM10 4 12 28 60 158 PM2.5 3 4 9 22 85 Acre Below Acre Above SRA No.Acres SRA No.Acres 17 1 17 1 Distance Increment Below 25 Distance Increment Above 25 Updated: 10/21/2009 - Table C-1. 2006 – 2008 Construction Localized Significance Thresholds CALEEMOD OUTPUT RESULTS WORKSHEET 3.2 Demolition - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 2.6243 0 2.6243 0.3973 0 0.3973Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 2.6243 0.9296 3.5538 0.3973 0.8895 1.2869 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling1.7141 10.448 7.3671 0.0209 7.6264 0.1893 7.8157 1.8859 0.1741 2.06Vendor0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.60E-04 0.0233 8.69E-03 0.032 6.71E-03 7.99E-03 0.0147Worker0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.29E-03 0.103 8.70E-04 0.1039 0.0275 7.90E-04 0.0283Total2.048 10.9694 8.5609 0.0231 7.7528 0.1989 7.9517 1.9202 0.1829 2.103 3.5395 23.4501 17.4055 0.0351 10.3771 1.1285 11.5055 2.3175 1.0724 3.3899 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.2267 0 0.2267 0.0245 0 0.0245Off-Road 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.36E-03 0.8912 0.8912 0.8199 0.8199Total1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 0.0094 0.2267 0.8912 1.1179 0.0245 0.8199 0.8444 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.60E-04 0.0233 8.69E-03 0.032 6.71E-03 7.99E-03 0.0147Worker0.1224 0.0303 0.3166 6.40E-04 0.0515 4.30E-04 0.052 0.0138 4.00E-04 0.0142Total0.2115 0.4911 0.8772 1.5000E-03 0.0749 9.12E-03 0.084 0.0205 8.39E-03 0.0289 1.6443 14.9596 8.2641 0.01086 0.3016 0.90032 1.2019 0.045 0.82829 0.8733 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.3294 0 0.3294 0.178 0 0.178Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.3294 0.9296 1.259 0.178 0.8895 1.0676 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling1.1839 7.2165 5.0885 0.0145 5.2676 0.1308 5.3984 1.3026 0.1203 1.4229Vendor0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.60E-04 0.0233 8.69E-03 0.032 6.71E-03 7.99E-03 0.0147Worker0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.29E-03 0.103 8.70E-04 0.1039 0.0275 7.90E-04 0.0283Total1.5179 7.7379 6.2823 0.0166 5.394 0.1403 5.5343 1.3368 0.129 1.4659 3.0094 20.2186 15.1269 0.0286 5.7234 1.0699 6.7933 1.5148 1.0185 2.5335 3.5 Trenching Utilities - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 0.4231 5.0516 3.4217 5.29E-03 0.2483 0.2484 0.2284 0.2284Total0.4231 5.0561 3.4217 5.29E-03 0.2483 0.2484 0.2284 0.2284 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.60E-04 0.0233 8.69E-03 0.032 6.71E-03 7.99E-03 0.0147Worker0.0734 0.0182 0.19 3.90E-04 0.0309 2.60E-04 0.0312 8.25E-03 2.40E-04 8.49E-03Total0.1626 0.479 0.7505 1.25E-03 0.0543 8.95E-03 0.0632 0.015 8.23E-03 0.0232 0.5857 5.5351 4.1722 0.00654 0.0543 0.25725 0.3116 0.015 0.23663 0.2516 3.6 Fine Grading - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.337 0 0.337 0.1792 0 0.1792Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.337 0.9296 1.2665 0.1792 0.8895 1.0687 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling1.6757 10.2136 7.2018 0.0205 3.7858 0.1851 3.9709 0.9429 0.1702 1.1131Vendor0.0891 0.4608 0.5606 8.60E-04 0.0233 8.69E-03 0.032 6.71E-03 7.99E-03 0.0147Worker0.2448 0.0606 0.6332 1.29E-03 0.103 8.70E-04 0.1039 0.0275 7.90E-04 0.0283Total2.0096 10.735 8.3956 0.0226 3.9122 0.1946 4.1068 0.9771 0.179 1.1561 3.5011 23.2157 17.2402 0.0346 4.2492 1.1242 5.3733 1.1563 1.0685 2.2248 3.7 Building Construction - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499Total1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0000000000Worker0.2693 0.0667 0.6965 1.42E-03 0.1133 9.50E-04 0.1143 0.0303 8.70E-04 0.0311Total0.2693 0.0667 0.6965 1.42E-03 0.1133 9.50E-04 0.1143 0.0303 8.70E-04 0.0311 1.7609 14.8862 9.0307 0.01272 0.1133 1.03345 1.1468 0.0303 0.95077 0.981 3.7 Building Construction - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0000000000Worker0.2514 0.06 0.6272 1.41E-03 0.1133 8.90E-04 0.1142 0.0303 8.20E-04 0.0311Total0.2514 0.06 0.6272 1.41E-03 0.1133 8.90E-04 0.1142 0.0303 8.20E-04 0.0311 1.7038 14.4245 8.9179 0.01271 0.1133 0.99949 1.1128 0.0303 0.91952 0.9498 3.8 Paving - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.2081 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 0.724 0.724 0.6697 0.6697Paving0.0554 0 0 0 0Total1.2635 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 0.724 0.724 0.6697 0.6697 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0000000000Worker0.4114 0.0981 1.0263 2.31E-03 0.1855 1.46E-03 0.1869 0.0495 1.34E-03 0.0508Total0.4114 0.0981 1.0263 2.31E-03 0.1855 1.46E-03 0.1869 0.0495 1.34E-03 0.0508 1.6749 11.6302 8.3781 0.01341 0.1855 0.72546 0.9109 0.0495 0.67104 0.7205 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayArchit. Coat 90.3825 0 0 0 0Off-Road 0.4062 2.568 1.9 2.97E-03 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207Total90.7887 2.568 1.9 2.97E-03 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0000000000Worker0.0457 0.0109 0.114 2.60E-04 0.0206 1.60E-04 0.0208 5.50E-03 1.50E-04 5.65E-03Total0.0457 0.0109 0.114 2.60E-04 0.0206 1.60E-04 0.0208 5.50E-03 1.50E-04 5.65E-03 90.8344 2.5789 2.014 0.00323 0.0206 0.22086 0.2415 0.0055 0.22085 0.22635 3.10 Finishing/Landscaping - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0000000000Worker0.2514 0.06 0.6272 1.41E-03 0.1133 8.90E-04 0.1142 0.0303 8.20E-04 0.0311Total0.2514 0.06 0.6272 1.41E-03 0.1133 8.90E-04 0.1142 0.0303 8.20E-04 0.0311 1.7038 14.4245 8.9179 0.01271 0.1133 0.99949 1.1128 0.0303 0.91952 0.9498 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.2267 0 0.2267 0.0245 0 0.0245Off-Road 1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.35E-03 0.8789 0.8789 0.8086 0.8086Total1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.35E-03 0.2267 0.8789 1.1056 0.0245 0.8086 0.8331 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.60E-04 0.0234 6.68E-03 0.03 6.71E-03 6.14E-03 0.0129Worker0.1143 0.0273 0.2851 6.40E-04 0.0515 4.10E-04 0.0519 0.0138 3.70E-04 0.0141Total0.1928 0.4284 0.8052 1.50E-03 0.0749 7.09E-03 0.082 0.0205 6.51E-03 0.027 1.6137 14.7152 8.2047 0.01085 0.3016 0.88599 1.1876 0.045 0.81511 0.8601 3.4 Rough Grading - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.3219 0 0.3219 0.1769 0 0.1769Off-Road 1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.874 0.874 0.8351 0.8351Total1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.3219 0.874 1.196 0.1769 0.8351 1.012 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling0.0208 0.1292 0.0969 2.90E-04 0.0498 2.08E-03 0.0519 0.0124 1.91E-03 0.0143Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.60E-04 0.0234 6.68E-03 0.03 6.71E-03 6.14E-03 0.0129Worker0.2286 0.0545 0.5702 1.28E-03 0.103 8.10E-04 0.1038 0.0275 7.50E-04 0.0282Total0.3279 0.5848 1.1871 2.43E-03 0.1762 9.57E-03 0.1858 0.0466 8.80E-03 0.0554 1.7386 12.5148 9.9929 0.01443 0.4981 0.88357 1.3818 0.2235 0.8439 1.0674 Phase 2 3.5 Fine Grading - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.3218 0 0.3218 0.1769 0 0.1769Off-Road 1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.874 0.874 0.8351 0.8351Total1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.3218 0.874 1.1958 0.1769 0.8351 1.012 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.60E-04 0.0234 6.68E-03 0.03 6.71E-03 6.14E-03 0.0129Worker0.2286 0.0545 0.5702 1.28E-03 0.103 8.10E-04 0.1038 0.0275 7.50E-04 0.0282Total0.307 0.4556 1.0902 2.14E-03 0.1264 7.49E-03 0.1339 0.0342 6.89E-03 0.0411 1.7177 12.3856 9.896 0.01414 0.4482 0.88149 1.3297 0.2111 0.84199 1.0531 3.6 Trenching/Utilities - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 0.4162 4.8604 3.436 5.29E-03 0.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207Total0.4162 4.8604 3.436 5.29E-03 0.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0785 0.4011 0.5201 8.60E-04 0.0234 6.68E-03 0.03 6.71E-03 6.14E-03 0.0129Worker0.0686 0.0164 0.171 3.90E-04 0.0309 2.40E-04 0.0312 8.25E-03 2.20E-04 8.47E-03Total0.147 0.4175 0.6911 1.25E-03 0.0543 6.92E-03 0.0612 0.015 6.36E-03 0.0213 0.5632 5.2779 4.1271 0.00654 0.0543 0.24682 0.3011 0.015 0.22706 0.242 3.7 Building Construction - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0196 0.1003 0.13 2.20E-04 5.84E-03 1.67E-03 7.51E-03 1.68E-03 1.54E-03 3.21E-03Worker0.0457 0.0109 0.114 2.60E-04 0.0206 1.60E-04 0.0208 5.50E-03 1.50E-04 5.65E-03Total0.0653 0.1112 0.2441 4.80E-04 0.0265 1.83E-03 0.0283 7.18E-03 1.69E-03 8.86E-03 1.5177 14.4757 8.5348 0.01178 0.0265 1.00043 1.0269 0.00718 0.92039 0.92756 3.7 Building Construction - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0179 0.0885 0.1228 2.10E-04 5.84E-03 1.39E-03 7.22E-03 1.68E-03 1.27E-03 2.95E-03Worker0.0429 9.86E-03 0.1034 2.60E-04 0.0206 1.60E-04 0.0208 5.50E-03 1.40E-04 5.64E-03Total0.0607 0.0984 0.2263 4.70E-04 0.0265 1.55E-03 0.028 7.18E-03 1.41E-03 8.59E-03 1.441 13.7917 8.4309 0.01177 0.0265 0.94045 0.9669 0.00718 0.86521 0.87239 3.8 Finishing/Landscaping - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0.0179 0.0885 0.1228 2.10E-04 5.84E-03 1.39E-03 7.22E-03 1.68E-03 1.27E-03 2.95E-03Worker0.0429 9.86E-03 0.1034 2.60E-04 0.0206 1.60E-04 0.0208 5.50E-03 1.40E-04 5.64E-03Total0.0607 0.0984 0.2263 4.70E-04 0.0265 1.55E-03 0.028 7.18E-03 1.41E-03 8.59E-03 1.441 13.7917 8.4309 0.01177 0.0265 0.94045 0.9669 0.00718 0.86521 0.87239 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayArchit. Coat 17.1286 0 0 0 0Off-Road 0.3681 2.3701 1.8822 2.97E-03 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964Total17.4968 2.3701 1.8822 2.97E-03 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayHauling 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0Vendor0000000000Worker0.0429 0.0099 0.1034 0.0003 0.0206 0.0002 0.0208 0.0055 0.00014 0.00564Total0.0429 0.0099 0.1034 0.0003 0.0206 0.0002 0.0208 0.0055 0.00014 0.00564 17.5397 2.38 1.9856 0.00327 0.0206 0.1966 0.2172 0.0055 0.19654 0.20204 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eCategorylb/day lb/dayArchit. Coat 49.7104 0 0 0 0 0 0Off-Road 0.4062 2.568 1.9 2.97E-03 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0 281.1898 281.1898 0.0366 281.9587Total50.1166 2.568 1.9 2.97E-03 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0 281.1898 281.1898 0.0366 281.9587 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eCategorylb/day lb/dayHauling0000000000 0 0 0 0Vendor00000000000000Worker0.0457 0.0109 0.114 2.60E-04 0.0206 1.60E-04 0.0208 5.50E-03 1.50E-04 5.65E-03 22.2727 22.2727 1.16E-03 22.297Total0.0457 0.0109 0.114 2.60E-04 0.0206 1.60E-04 0.0208 5.50E-03 1.50E-04 5.65E-03 22.2727 22.2727 1.16E-03 22.297 50.1623 2.5789 2.014 0.00323 0.0206 0.22086 0.2415 0.0055 0.22085 0.22635 0 303.4625 303.4625 0.03776 0 304.2557 Mitigated Regional Construction - Architectural Coatings Total 3.2 Demolition - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 2.6243 0 2.6243 0.3973 0 0.3973Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 2.6243 0.9296 3.5538 0.3973 0.8895 1.2869 3.3 Site Preparation - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.2267 0 0.2267 0.0245 0 0.0245Off-Road 1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.36E-03 0.8912 0.8912 0.8199 0.8199Total1.4328 14.4685 7.3869 9.36E-03 0.2267 0.8912 1.1179 0.0245 0.8199 0.8444 Phase 1 3.4 Rough Grading - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.3294 0 0.3294 0.178 0 0.178Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.3294 0.9296 1.259 0.178 0.8895 1.0676 3.5 Trenching Utilities - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 0.4231 5.0516 3.4217 5.29E-03 0.2483 0.2484 0.2284 0.2284Total0.4231 5.0561 3.4217 5.29E-03 0.2483 0.2484 0.2284 0.2284 3.6 Fine Grading - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.337 0 0.337 0.1792 0 0.1792Off-Road 1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.9296 0.9296 0.8895 0.8895Total1.4915 12.4807 8.8446 0.012 0.337 0.9296 1.2665 0.1792 0.8895 1.0687 3.7 Building Construction - 2014 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499Total1.4916 14.8195 8.3342 0.0113 1.0325 1.0325 0.9499 0.9499 3.7 Building Construction - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 3.8 Paving - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.2081 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 0.724 0.724 0.6697 0.6697Paving0.0554 0 0 0 0Total1.2635 11.5321 7.3518 0.0111 0.724 0.724 0.6697 0.6697 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayArchit. Coat 90.3825 0 0 0 0Off-Road 0.4062 2.568 1.9 2.97E-03 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207Total90.7887 2.568 1.9 2.97E-03 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 0.2207 3.10 Finishing/Landscaping - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Phase 2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2015 `` Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.2267 0 0.2267 0.0245 0 0.0245Off-Road 1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.35E-03 0.8789 0.8789 0.8086 0.8086Total1.4209 14.2868 7.3995 9.35E-03 0.2267 0.8789 1.1056 0.0245 0.8086 0.8331 3.4 Rough Grading - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.3219 0 0.3219 0.1769 0 0.1769Off-Road 1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.874 0.874 0.8351 0.8351Total1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.3219 0.874 1.196 0.1769 0.8351 1.012 3.5 Fine Grading - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayFugitive Dust 0.3218 0 0.3218 0.1769 0 0.1769Off-Road 1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.874 0.874 0.8351 0.8351Total1.4107 11.93 8.8058 0.012 0.3218 0.874 1.1958 0.1769 0.8351 1.012 3.6 Trenching/Utilities - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 0.4162 4.8604 3.436 5.29E-03 0.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207Total0.4162 4.8604 3.436 5.29E-03 0.2399 0.2399 0.2207 0.2207 3.7 Building Construction - 2015 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187Total1.4524 14.3645 8.2907 0.0113 0.9986 0.9986 0.9187 0.9187 3.7 Building Construction - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638 3.8 Finishing/Landscaping - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayOff-Road 1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638Total1.3803 13.6933 8.2046 0.0113 0.9389 0.9389 0.8638 0.8638 3.9 Architectural Coatings - 2016 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorylb/dayArchit. Coat 17.1286 0 0 0 0Off-Road 0.3681 2.3701 1.8822 2.97E-03 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964Total17.4968 2.3701 1.8822 2.97E-03 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 0.1964 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 TotalCategorytons/yrArea 0.0397 6.00E-05 5.94E-03 0 2.00E-05 2.00E-05 2.00E-05 2.00E-05Energy5.50E-04 4.99E-03 4.19E-03 3.00E-05 3.80E-04 3.80E-04 3.80E-04 3.80E-04Mobile0.054 0.0162 0.1752 4.50E-04 0.0382 2.40E-04 0.0385 0.0101 2.20E-04 0.0104Waste0000Water0000Total0.0942 0.0213 0.1853 4.80E-04 0.0382 6.40E-04 0.0389 0.0101 6.20E-04 0.0108 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 92.5382 17.0034 10.9319 0.01594 0.1339 1.22035 1.3543 0.0358 1.14037 1.1761594.2131 28.6336 19.31 0.02935 0.3194 1.94581 2.2652 0.0853 1.81141 1.8966594.2131 28.6336 19.31 0.02935 0.3194 1.94581 2.2652 0.0853 1.81141 1.89665 94.2131 28.6336 19.31 0.02935 0.3194 1.94581 2.2652 0.0853 1.81141 1.89665 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 18.9807 16.1717 10.4165 0.01504 0.0471 1.13705 1.1841 0.01268 1.06175 1.0744318.9807 16.1717 10.4165 0.01504 0.0471 1.13705 1.1841 0.01268 1.06175 1.074432.882 27.5834 16.8618 0.02354 0.053 1.8809 1.9338 0.01436 1.73042 1.7447820.4217 29.9634 18.8474 0.02681 0.0736 2.0775 2.151 0.01986 1.92696 1.94682 20.4217 29.9634 18.8474 0.02681 0.0736 2.0775 2.151 0.01986 1.92696 1.94682 BC + AC (2015)BC + AC + Paving (2015)AC + Paving + Finishing/Landscaping Phase 1 Phase 2 AC + Finishing/LandscapingBC + Finishing/Landscaping Maximum Maximum BC + AC + Finishing/Landscaping BC + AC ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 92.2411 16.9325 10.1907 0.01427 0 1.2193 1.2193 0 1.139493.5046 28.4646 17.5425 0.02537 0 1.9433 1.9433 0 1.809193.5046 28.4646 17.5425 0.02537 0 1.9433 1.9433 0 1.8091 93.5046 28.4646 17.5425 0.02537 0 1.9433 1.9433 0 1.8091 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 18.8771 16.0634 10.0868 0.01427 0 1.1353 1.1353 0 1.060218.8771 16.0634 10.0868 0.01427 0 1.1353 1.1353 0 1.06022.7606 27.3866 16.4092 0.0226 0 1.8778 1.8778 0 1.727620.2574 29.7567 18.2914 0.02557 0 2.0742 2.0742 0 1.924 20.2574 29.7567 18.2914 0.02557 0 2.0742 2.0742 0 1.924 Phase 1 BC + AC (2015)BC + AC + Paving (2015)AC + Paving + Finishing/Landscaping Maximum AC + Finishing/LandscapingBC + Finishing/Landscaping Maximum Phase 2 BC + AC BC + AC + Finishing/Landscaping Appendix Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim Appendix D Noise Study Appendix The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 1 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. Consultants in Acoustics, Noise & Vibration September 27, 2012 BARB AR A HELTON IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Avenue, Suite 110 Irvine, CA 92612 Subject: Noise Study for the Servite High School Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA. Reference: Project information provided by IBI Group, received by email June 28, 2012. Dear Ms. Helton: Acoustics Group, Inc., (AGI) has conducted a noise study of the Servite High School Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA. The school is proposing to construct a new Aquatics Complex, construct bleachers for the Baseball field and also realign the Baseball field. AGI has reviewed the City of Anaheim’s noise ordinance standards, conducted baseline ambient noise measurements, analyzed future noise levels associated with the project, and assessed the potential impact of the Project noise onto the surrounding community. The following provides the results of our work: Location of Project Site Servit e High School is located in Anaheim, California. The area surrounding the school is primarily single and multi-family residential landuses. W La Palma Avenue and North Wichita Street border the school to the north and east, respectively. Single family residences border the school to the west and south. The Campus Expansion Project will occur on the southwest portion of the campus. Refer to Figure 1 for the location of the school and vicinity map. Figure 2 shows a rendering of the proposed construction area relative to the campus. Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 2 Figure 1. Location of Servite High School. Noise and the A-weighted Sound Level Noise is most often defined as unwanted sound. Although sound can be easily measured, the perceptibility is subjective and the physical response to sound complicates the analysis of its impact on people. People judge the relative magnitude of sound sensation in subjective terms such as “noisiness” or “loudness.” Sound pressure magnitude is measured and quantified using a logarithmic ratio of pressures, the scale of which gives the level of sound in decibels (dB). The human hearing system is not equally sensitive to sound at all frequencies. Therefore, to approximate this human, frequency-dependent response, the A-weighting filter system is used to adjust measured sound levels. The A-weighted sound level is expressed in "dBA" or "dB(A)." Figure 3 provides typical A-weighted sound levels measured for various sources, as well as people’s responses to these levels. Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 3 Figure 2. Proposed Servite High School Campus Expansion Project. Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 4 Figure 3. Typical A-weighted Sound Levels from Indoor and Outdoor Noise Sources. Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 5 When sound is measured for distinct time intervals, the statistical distribution of the overall sound level can be obtained during that period. The energy-equivalent sound level (Leq) is the most common parameter associated with such measurements. The Leq metric is a single-number noise descriptor which represents the average sound level over a given period of time, where the actual sound level varies with time. Lmax, Lmin, and Lxx are also common noise descriptors. Lmax and Lmin are the maximum and minimum noise levels, respectively, and Lxx, known as a statistical sound level, is the time-varying noise level which would be exceeded xx percent of the time. Noise Standards The City of Anaheim regulates intrusive noise with Noise Ordinance Standards within the Municipal Code. Chapter 6.70 of the Noise Ordinance indicates that the maximum sound pressure level radiating from a single premises should not at any point on the property line exceed sixty decibels (60 dBA) read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Future noise from the Project’s Aquatics Complex, Baseball Facility and related operations are limited to 60 dBA at the residential boundaries. Construction noise occurring between the hours of 7 am to 7 pm is exempt from the standards set forth in the noise ordinance. Additional hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or Building Official. Refer to the Appendix for the Noise Ordinance. Existing Noise Environment A baseline noise survey was conducted from August 2, 2012 to August 3, 2012 to measure the existing noise levels around the Project site. Three residential locations nearby the project site were selected for the survey. The three receiver locations were 954 N Keystone St on the left side of the house (NM1), 934 N Keystone St in the backyard (NM2), and 951 N Keystone St on the left side of the house behind the fence (NM3). The background noise at each receiver location was measured continuously over a 24 -hour period to document baseline conditions. At location NM1, the Leq ranged from 40.8 to 58.3 dBA. At locations NM2 and NM3, the Leq ranged from 40.5 to 57.8 dBA and 44 .0 to 56.2 dBA, respectively. The types of sources that contributed to the baseline data included vehicle traffic, aircraft, wild life (birds and dogs ) and residential activity. Table 1 summarizes the Leq, Lmax and Lmin measured at each location. Refer to Figure 4 for the location of the noise measurements and to the Appendix for the complete set of measurement data. Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 6 Table 1. Summary of the Noise Measurement Data Date Location Range of Leq Lmax Lmin Description 8/2/2012 - 8/3/2012 NM1 40.8 - 58.3 86.4 36.6 Community and freeway traffic; aircraft; community and wildlife noise 8/2/2012 - 8/3/2012 NM2 40.5 - 57.8 80.0 36.6 Community and freeway traffic; aircraft; community and wildlife noise 8/2/2012 - 8/3/2012 NM3 44.0 - 56.2 81.8 35.5 Community and freeway traffic; aircraft; community and wildlife noise; faint music Figure 4. Location of the Noise Measurements Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 7 Future Project Noise The Campus Expansion Project would construct a new Aquatics Complex, bleachers for the Baseball field and also realign the Baseball field. Typical noise sources associated with the Project include swimming, batting cages, swimming meets, baseball games, crowds, and people cheering. AGI analyzed the future noise levels from the campus expansion project using geometrics from the project drawings and our database of recreation noise sources. Noise data from batting cages was also obtained to supplement the modeling data. The operations noise was analyzed at five receiver locations that immediately border the Project site. Receivers R1 through R5 are shown in Figure 5. Table 2 summarizes the noise source data used for the analysis. Figure 5. Location of the Noise Sensitive Receivers from the Noise Analysis Table 2. Noise Source Data Used in the Analysis Source Distance from Source, ft A-Weighted Sound Level, dBA Swimming Pool 75 57 Baseball Game 83 58 Batting Cage 45 73 Parking Lot 30 63 Crowd Noise 105 67 Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 8 The CadnaA Acoustical Model was used to simulate the layout of the project. Noise source data from Table 2 was inputted into the model along with the relative location of the sources, receivers and intervening structures. The results of the analysis indicate that future noise from the Expansion Project would be 51.4, 56.8, 54.8, 59.2 and 57.4 dBA at Receivers R1 through R5, respectively. When compared with the City’s Noise Ordinance Standard of 60 dBA, future noise from Aquatics Complex and Baseball Facility operations would be below the noise standard. Noise from the Servite High School Expansion Project would not impact the surrounding residential properties and is considered to be less than significant. Table 3 summarizes the results of the noise analysis and impact assessment at each receiver location. Table 3. Predicted Aquatics Complex and Baseball Operations Noise Levels Receiver Predicted Operations Noise Level, Leq, dBA Noise Ordinance Standard, dBA Impact Assessment R1 51.4 60 Compliance - No Impact R2 56.8 60 Compliance - No Impact R3 54.8 60 Compliance - No Impact R4 59.2 60 Compliance - No Impact R5 57.4 60 Compliance - No Impact Construction Noise Construction of the Project is anticipated to take place in three fairly distinct phases: (1) ground demolition; (2) Rough building construction; and (3) finishing and cleanup. Each phase involves the use of different kinds of construction equipment and, therefore, has its own distinct noise characteristics. Demolition usually involves a backhoe and crane. Building construction typically involves the use of two drill rigs, one backhoe, one mobile crane, an extended boom forklift, hammers, generators, compressors, and light trucks. Finishing and site cleanup generally include trucks, landscape rollers, and compactors. Construction of the proposed Project would entail each of the three construction phases. Typical noise level ranges associated with each construction phase at a distance of 50 feet from the noise source are presented in Table 4. All three phases would have the potential to generate noise levels exceeding ambient conditions. The highest and generally most sustained noise levels typically occur during the demolition and rough construction phases. Construction noise may be a short-term annoyance to the nearest residences that border the Project site; however, construction operations are exempt from compliance with the noise ordinance during the hours of 7 am to 7 pm. Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 9 Table 4. Typical Noise Levels at Construction Sites Construction Activity Noise Level (dBA) at 50 feet Demolition 89 Rough Building Construction 88 Finish Construction 87 Source: Bolt, Beranek and Newman, "Noise from Construction Equipment and Operations, Building Equipment, and Home Appliances," prepared for the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, December 31, 1971. Noise Control Noise control measures over and above the existing project design would not be required for the project. Construction operations should be limited to the hours of 7 am to 7 pm to ensure compliance with the noise standards. Conclusion AGI has reviewed the City of Anaheim’s noise ordinance standards, conducted baseline ambient noise measurements, analyzed future noise levels associated with the project, and assessed the potential impact of the Project noise onto the surrounding community. The results of our analysis indicate that the Servite High School Campus Expansion Project would not result in future noise levels that exceed the City of Anaheim Noise Ordinance Standards at the nearest residences and would not create a noise impact to the surrounding community. Construction noise would likely be at or above ambient noise levels during the heaviest periods of activity. Although the construction could be a short-term annoyance to the nearest residences, the noise is exempt under the Noise Ordinance. Noise control measures over and above the existing project design would not be required. If you have any questions regarding this report, please contact the undersigned at 877-595 -9988. Sincerely, ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. Robert Woo Principal Consultant APPENDIX Noise Study for Servite High School’s Campus Expansion Project in Anaheim, CA September 27, 2012 ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC. For IBI Group Use Only 602.635.6196 - Voice Not for Public Release 877.595.9988 – Toll Free 877.595.9989 - Fax 10 Noise Ordinance Project Drawings Noise Measurement Data Analysis Input and Output Files Search: Links: Document Prev Chapter Next Chapter Contents Sync TOC Framed Version Anaheim Municipal Code Title 6 PUBLIC HEALTH AND SAFETY Chapter 6.70 SOUND PRESSURE LEVELS Chapter 6.70 SOUND PRESSURE LEVELS Sections: 6.70.010 Established. 6.70.020 Violations and penalties. 6.70.030 Enforcement. 6.70.010 ESTABLISHED. Sound produced in excess of the sound pressure levels permitted herein are hereby determined to be objectionable and constitute an infringement upon the right and quiet enjoyment ofproperty in this City. No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces asound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty decibels (Re 0.0002 Microbar) read on the A-scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response. The sound level measuring microphone shall be placed at any point on the property line, but not closer than three (3) feet from any wall and not less than three (3) feet above the ground, where the above listed maximum sound pressure level shall apply. At any point the measured level shall be the average of not less than three (3) readings taken at two (2) minute intervals. To have valid readings, the levels must be five (5) decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source’s ofthe alleged objectionable sound are not operating. Sound pressure levels shall be measured with a sound level meter manufactured according to American Standard S1.4-1961 published by the American Standards Association, Inc., New York City, New York. Traffic sounds sound created by emergencyactivities and sound created by governmental units or their contractors shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter. Sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or Building Official. (Ord. 2526 § 1 (part); June 18, 1968; Ord. 3400 § 1; February 11, 1975: Ord. 6020 § 1; April 25, 2006.) 6.70.020 VIOLATIONS AND PENALTIES. ALP http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/California/anaheim/title6publich... 9/27/2012 2:22 PM The first violation of this chapter by any person shall be punishable as an infraction in accordance with applicable provisions of the California Penal Code and the California Government Code. The second and all subsequent violations of said chapter committed by such person shall be punishable as a misdemeanor. (Ord. 5929 § 9; July 27, 2004.) 6.70.030 ENFORCEMENT. The Code Enforcement Manager of the City of Anaheim shall enforce the provisions of this chapter. (Ord. 5812 § 25; June 11, 2002.) Disclaimer: This Code of Ordinances and/or anyother documents that appear onthis site maynot reflect the most current legislation adopted bythe Municipality. American Legal Publishing Corporation provides these documents for informational purposes only. These documents should not be relied upon as the definitive authorityfor local legislation. Additionally, the formatting and pagination of the posted documents varies from the formatting and paginationof the official copy. The official printed copyof a Code of Ordinances should be consulted prior to anyaction being taken. For further information regarding the official version of anyof this Code of Ordinances or other documents posted on this site, please contact the Municipalitydirectlyor contact American Legal Publishing toll-free at 800-445-5588. © 2011 American Legal Publishing Corporation techsupport@amlegal.com 1.800.445.5588. ALP http://www.amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/California/anaheim/title6publich... 9/27/2012 2:22 PM NOISE STUDY FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY PROJECT2030405060708090100NOISE LEVEL, dBABEGINNING HOURHOURLY NOISE LEVELS AT N-1August 2-3, 2012LeqLmaxLminL2L8L25L50L90L99ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC.DRAFT HOURLY NOISE LEVELS AT N-2August 23 201290100August 2-3, 20127080L, dBALeqLmaxLminL2405060NOISE LEVELL2L8L25L50L90203040L99BEGINNING HOUR NOISE STUDY FOR THE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INTERNATIONAL GATEWAY PROJECT2030405060708090100NOISE LEVEL, dBABEGINNING HOURHOURLY NOISE LEVELS AT N-3August 2-3, 2012LeqLmaxLminL2L8L25L50L90L99ACOUSTICS GROUP, INC.DRAFT Project: SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Address:Date: 8/2/12- Location: SIDE YARD 8/3/12 Noise Position: N-1 Sources: HNL, TIME dB(A) 04:00 - 05:00 PM 55.9 05:00 - 06:00 PM 54.2 06:00 - 07:00 PM 58.3 07:00 - 08:00 PM 55.2 08:00 - 09:00 PM 54.2 09:00 - 10:00 PM 53.8 10:00 - 11:00 PM 46.9 11:00 - 12:00 AM 47.9 12:00 - 01:00 AM 46.1 01:00 - 02:00 AM 44.3 02:00 - 03:00 AM 41.1 03:00 - 04:00 AM 40.8 04:00 - 05:00 AM 43.7 05:00 - 06:00 AM 46.2 06:00 - 07:00 AM 49.2 MEASUREMENT DATA - HOURLY NOISE LEVELS 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SPL, dBA 07:00 - 08:00 AM 49.0 08:00 - 09:00 AM 54.9 09:00 - 10:00 AM 48.7 10:00 - 11:00 AM 50.1 11:00 - 12:00 PM 51.9 12:00 - 01:00 PM 53.1 01:00 - 02:00 PM 55.1 02:00 - 03:00 PM 55.6 03:00 - 04:00 PM 57.3 CNEL: 56.0 Notes: Refer to field data sheet 35 40 04:00 PM05:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:00 AM01:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:00 PM01:0002:0003:00TIME Source: Acoustics Group, Inc. 2008 DRAFT Project: SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Address:Date: 8/2/12- Location: SIDE YARD 8/3/12 Noise Position: N-2 Sources: HNL, TIME dB(A) 05:00 - 06:00 PM 52.0 06:00 - 07:00 PM 51.7 07:00 - 08:00 PM 53.0 08:00 - 09:00 PM 53.4 09:00 - 10:00 PM 55.4 10:00 - 11:00 PM 47.0 11:00 - 12:00 AM 49.0 12:00 - 01:00 AM 46.1 01:00 - 02:00 AM 44.2 02:00 - 03:00 AM 40.5 03:00 - 04:00 AM 40.5 04:00 - 05:00 AM 44.5 05:00 - 06:00 AM 45.6 06:00 - 07:00 AM 46.7 07:00 - 08:00 AM 47.4 MEASUREMENT DATA - HOURLY NOISE LEVELS 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SPL, dBA 08:00 - 09:00 AM 57.8 09:00 - 10:00 AM 52.3 10:00 - 11:00 AM 50.3 11:00 - 12:00 PM 48.0 12:00 - 01:00 PM 51.6 01:00 - 02:00 PM 51.5 02:00 - 03:00 PM 51.3 03:00 - 04:00 PM 52.4 04:00 - 05:00 PM 51.5 CNEL: 55.1 Notes: Refer to field data sheet 35 40 05:00 PM06:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:00 AM01:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:00 PM01:0002:0003:0004:00TIME Source: Acoustics Group, Inc. 2008 DRAFT Project: SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Address:Date: 8/2/12- Location: SIDE YARD 8/3/12 Noise Position: N-3 Sources: HNL, TIME dB(A) 05:00 - 06:00 PM 53.1 06:00 - 07:00 PM 53.8 07:00 - 08:00 PM 54.5 08:00 - 09:00 PM 54.2 09:00 - 10:00 PM 53.6 10:00 - 11:00 PM 49.4 11:00 - 12:00 AM 49.0 12:00 - 01:00 AM 47.4 01:00 - 02:00 AM 47.0 02:00 - 03:00 AM 44.0 03:00 - 04:00 AM 44.6 04:00 - 05:00 AM 46.9 05:00 - 06:00 AM 47.6 06:00 - 07:00 AM 48.3 07:00 - 08:00 AM 50.3 MEASUREMENT DATA - HOURLY NOISE LEVELS 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 SPL, dBA 08:00 - 09:00 AM 56.2 09:00 - 10:00 AM 52.2 10:00 - 11:00 AM 50.2 11:00 - 12:00 PM 49.9 12:00 - 01:00 PM 52.3 01:00 - 02:00 PM 52.3 02:00 - 03:00 PM 54.2 03:00 - 04:00 PM 53.7 04:00 - 05:00 PM 54.0 CNEL: 56.1 Notes: Refer to field data sheet 35 40 05:00 PM06:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:00 AM01:0002:0003:0004:0005:0006:0007:0008:0009:0010:0011:0012:00 PM01:0002:0003:0004:00TIME Source: Acoustics Group, Inc. 2008 DRAFT Area Source Name Result. PWL (dBA) Result. PWL " Lw/Li Coordinates Type Value x (m)y (m)z (m) Pool 101.7 70.7 Lw ALS 1494.32 1993.3 0.3 1494.32 1941.51 0.3 1518.47 1941.51 0.3 1518.76 1993.3 0.3 Batting Cage 1 110 87.7 Lw ABC 1523.89 1857.39 1.5 1523.89 1834.29 1.5 1531.22 1834.29 1.5 1531.22 1857.39 1.5 Batting Cage 2 110 87.7 Lw ABC 1554.36 1814.4 1.5 1554.36 1807.12 1.5 1577.46 1807.12 1.5 1577.46 1814.4 1.5 Parking 99.8 74.1 Lw APL 1490 1922.48 0 1518.03 1922.48 0 1518.03 1909.06 0 1490 1909.06 0 Baseball 104.6 104.6 Lw ABG 1533.99 1863.74 1.5 1533.99 1818.66 1.5 1583.76 1818.66 1.5 1583.76 1863.74 1.5 Point Source Name Result. PWL (dBA) Lw/Li Height (m) Coordinates Type Value x (m)y (m)z (m) CRWD1 109.1 Lw CRWD 1.5 1488.99 1963.99 1.5 CRWD2 109.1 Lw CRWD 1.5 1502.96 1930.81 1.5 CRWD3 109.1 Lw CRWD 1.5 1526.24 1827.21 1.5 CRWD4 109.1 Lw CRWD 1.5 1546.9 1812.66 1.5 CRWD5 109.1 Lw CRWD 1.5 1523.04 1887.74 1.5 Barriers Name x (m)y (m)z (m) Pool Barrier 1520.5 1996.92 3.66 1485.5 1996.92 3.66 1484.5 1924.6 3.66 1520.4 1924 3.66 Baseball Barrier 1484.5 1907 1.83 1520.07 1907 4.57 1520.4 1810.6 4.57 1627.69 1810.6 4.57 Baseball Side Barrier 1520.7 1903.68 4.57 1525.16 1903.68 4.57 1530.69 1925.51 4.57 Receivers Name Level (dBA) Limit Value Land Use Height Coordinates Auto Noise Type (m)X (m)Y (m)Z (m) R1 51.5 0 x Total 1.5 r 1500 2000 1.5 R2 56.8 0 x Total 1.5 r 1507.85 1903.95 1.5 R3 54.6 0 x Total 1.5 r 1453 1963 1.5 R4 59.3 0 x Total 1.5 r 1510.17 1845.49 1.5 R5 59.3 0 x Total 1.5 r 1535.7 1798.55 1.5 Sound Levels Name ID Li/Lw Frequency A lin500100020004000 Crowd Noise CRWD Lw 103 103 103 103 109.1 109.1 Swimming ALS Lw 66 68 64 54 70.7 71.2 Baseball Game ABG Lw 65 65 65 65 71.1 71 Batting Cages ABC Lw 84 81.2 81.4 79.4 87.7 93.8 Parking Lot APL Lw 68 68 68 68 74.1 74 Result Table Receiver Lr w/o Noise Control (dBA) R1 51.4 R2 56.8 R3 54.8 R4 59.2 R5 57.4 Appendix Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim Appendix E Parking Study Appendix The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. Parking Study 1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 City of Anaheim, California Prepared for City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 November 2012 Prepared by IBI Group 18401 Von Karman Ave, Suite 110 Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 833-5588 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - ii - Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION........................................................................................................................... 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................ 4 3.1 Existing Site uses ............................................................................................................ 4 3.2 Proposed Site Uses ........................................................................................................ 4 3.3 Parking Access ............................................................................................................... 5 4.0 PARKING REQUIREMENTS ................................................................................................................. 7 4.1 Existing Site Parking Requirements ................................................................................. 7 5.0 EXISTING SITE PARKING SURVEY ...................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Servite High School Parking Survey ................................................................................ 8 6.0 METHODOLOGY OF STUDY............................................................................................................... 10 7.0 FINDINGS ......................................................................................................................................... 13 7.1 Parking Space Requirements ........................................................................................ 13 8.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ....................................................................................... 14 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - iii - List of Figures Figure 2.1 Existing Project Location ............................................................................................ 3 Figure 3.1 Proposed Site Plan ..................................................................................................... 6 Figure 5.1 Existing Project Site Parking Area ............................................................................... 9 Figure 6.1 Proposed Parking Areas ........................................................................................... 12 List of Tables Table 3-1: Servite High School Building Type and Size ............................................................... 4 Table 4-1: Off-Street Parking Space Requirements for Existing Site ............................................ 7 Table 4-2: Existing Site Parking Space Requirement Calculation ................................................. 7 Table 5-1: Servite High School On-Site Parking Occupancy ........................................................ 8 Table 6-1: Parking Generation Comparison ............................................................................... 10 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 1 - 1.0 Introduction This report documents the results of a parking demand study prepared for Servite High School (the project). Servite High School is an all-boy college preparatory high school founded in 1958. Servite High School currently enrolls 950 students in grades 9 through 12. In this project, Servite High School proposes to modernize the existing Aquatics Center, improve the existing baseball field, and install field lighting. The site is designated as a school land use in the City of Anaheim’s General Plan. All assumptions and methodologies are consistent with the City of Anaheim guidelines for a parking demand study. 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 2 - 2.0 Project Location Servite High School is situated on a rectangular-shaped parcel consisting of approximately 14.75 acres of land located on the south side of La Palma Avenue between Wichita Avenue and Keystone Street. Existing facilities at the school include a swimming pool, 400 meter outdoor track, 6,341 square feet of office space, a football field, baseball field, and parking lots. A total of 319 off-street parking spaces are available on site. A majority, 244, of the parking spaces are designated for students on the east side of the school. Seventy-five staff parking spaces are located on the west side of the school site. The project proposes the modernization of the existing aquatics center, improvement to the existing baseball field, and installation of field lighting. The Aquatics Center project site is proposed to be constructed on a series of single family residential parcels owned by Servite High School bordering the campus on the west and located at 1954, 1950, 1944, 1940, and 1934 Keystone Street. All of these properties are currently owned (or in escrow) by Servite High School. The project site is located east of the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5). Figure 2.1 provides a vicinity map showing the relative location of the project site. 1952 West La Palma Avenue Servite High School Parking Study November 2012Witchita StreetLa Palma Avenue Key Map Project Site Figure 2.1 – Existing Project Location Project Location Lot A: Student Lot Lot B: Staff and Non-Offi ce Employee 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 4 - 3.0 Site Description 3.1 EXISTING SITE USES Servite High School includes a range of building types for athletic and academic uses. The type and size of these facilities can be seen in the table below. Table 3-1: Servite High School Building Type and Size Building Type Existing Total Building Square- Footage (s.f.) Classroom Buildings 50,466 Auditorium/Classroom 31,875 Gymnasium 20,493 Chapel 14,747 Pool Building 847 Miscellaneous (Sports Field, etc.)7,320 Total 125,748 3.2 PROPOSED SITE USES Proposed improvements for the site involve upgrades to existing facilities, particularly related to athletics. The proposed improvements will not result in changes to the student count or frequency or size of events occurring on the site. Servite High School is proposing to modernize the existing Aquatics Center, relocate it, and enlarge the facility to include an Olympic size pool. The existing pool/support building is too small to meet the practice and competition needs for both the male and female students who use the facility. The single family homes located on the east side of Keystone Street with addresses of 1954, 1950, 1944, 1940, and 1934 Keystone Street are owned by Servite and are proposed to be demolished to allow for the development of the new aquatic facilities. The proposed new pool facility consists of the following: • 51 meter x 25 yard pool surrounded by a concrete pool deck • A 4,500 square foot Pool Building housing Boys’ and Girls’ locker rooms, restrooms, and shower facilities; a team room, a coach’s office and shower; pool equipment, storage, and a small concession stand. • Metal bleachers (450 seats) with shade covering • 4 sports lighting poles with mounted fixtures • The total facility area is approximately 39,690 SF In addition to the pool, the baseball field will be re-oriented with the batter facing northeast. This is recommended to minimize the quantity of baseballs in the backyards of the adjacent residential 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 5 - properties. A 3,560 square foot building located along the south property line will house a team room, storage, restrooms, and a small concession. Additionally, metal bleachers will be installed with a shade covering, and new batting cages and dug-outs will be provided for both the home and visitor teams. The relocation of bungalows currently serving as the music room, weight room and 3 classrooms on the northwest corner of the baseball field will be housed in modular buildings at the site of the existing pool facility. An additional 25 parking spaces are proposed in the updated site plan by redesigning the parking lots. 3.3 PARKING ACCESS Vehicle access to the student parking lot is provided via two existing 20 foot wide driveways from La Palma Avenue. A fenced off driveway also provides emergency access to the lot from Wichita Avenue. Access to the staff parking lot is provided via one drive on La Palma Avenue and one driveway on Dogwood Avenue. 1952 West La Palma Avenue Servite High School Parking Study November 2012 130 125 METALRAMPMETALRAMPSTEPSTEPMISC MISC MISC MISC MISC TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES POOL POOLPOOLPOOL DENSE TREES DENSE DENSE TREES DENSETREES DENSEDENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASP CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONCCONC CONCCONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC ONC CONC . . . ... ... . . . . MISC MISC MISC MISC POOL TREES TREES TREESTREESTREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSETREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSETREES ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPHASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC C .. . . . . . . . . . TREES 18.5'WIDEC/L GATE8'WIDEC/L GATE8.5'WIDEC/L GATE4'WIDEC/L GATE8"WIDE BLOCK WALLSTAIRS 6'HIGH CLF6'HIGH CLF6'HIGH CLF4'WIDEC/L GATE4'WIDEC/L GATE 3'WIDEC/L GATE4'HIGH CLF 4'HIGH CLF 6'WIDEC/L GATE C/L GATE10'WIDE 4'HIGH CLF 6'HIGH CLF20'WIDEC/L GATE 8"WIDE SCREEN WALL 6"WIDE SCREEN WALL 6"WIDE SCREEN WALL CONC CONCCONC CONC CONCCONCCONC CONC ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS OH-WIRES OH-WIRES OH-WIRESOH-WIRES30'WIDEC/L DWY30'WIDEC/L DWY19.5'WIC/L DW15'WIDEC/L GATE CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAY3'WIDE V-GUTTER3'WIDE V-GUTTER3'WIDE V-GUTTER15.5'WIDEC/L DWY STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS STAIRSSTEPS CANOPY DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDGEXISTINGBLDG MUSICGUITAR WR EXISTINGSTORAGE TEMPORARY FENCE LOCATION EXIISTING TOWER SCORE BOARD 30'HIGHFENCE 21 PARKING AQUATIC CENTER BASEBALLCOMPLEX 114' - 9 5/8"CENTER LINE OF KEYSTONE ST32' - 0"43' - 0"133' - 9"37' - 0"24' - 0"30'-0"R.O.W 8'-0"PARKWAY 4'-0"SIDEWALK 12'-0"SETBACKFROM R.O.W 30 PARKING SPACES 244 PARKING SPACES 20' - 0"20' - 0"2 0 '-0 "R 50 '-0 "R 5 0 '-0 " 20' - 0" EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDG 10 PARKING 25 PARKING SPACES 14 PARKING SPACES 24' - 0"EXISTINGBLDG 24' - 0" 3 COMPACTSERVICEPARKING NORTH Figure 3.1 – Proposed Site Plan 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 7 - 4.0 Parking Requirements 4.1 EXISTING SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS The minimum number of off-street parking spaces required for each land use type is defined in Section 18 of the City of Anaheim Zoning Code. The existing site consists of a high school that falls under a General Educational Institutions land use and Community & Religious Assembly land use category. Table 4-1 shows the Off Street Parking Space Requirements of the existing use as stated in section 18 of the City of Anaheim Zoning Code. Table 4-1: Off-Street Parking Space Requirements for Existing Site Use Classification Minimum Required Parking Spaces Educational Institutions - General High Schools: 1 space per non-office employee, plus 1 space per 6 students, plus 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for office use, plus parking required for assembly halls and auditoriums. (see Community & Religious Assembly) Community & Religious Assembly 0.333 space per fixed seat, or 29 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, whichever results in a greater number of spaces, plus 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for office use, plus, if a kitchen facility is provided, 0.02 space per person for the maximum capacity figure of the assembly area determined by the City Fire Department; if other types of ancillary uses other than a Sunday school are included, a parking demand study may be required. Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040 GFA – gross floor area The number of off-street parking spaces required for the project site is calculated in Table 4-2. Table 4-2: Existing Site Parking Space Requirement Calculation Use Classification Unit Quantity Min Rate (Spaces/Unit) Spaces Required Educational Institutions – General (Non- office Employees) People 68 1 space per non-office employee 68 Educational Institutions – General (Students) People 950 1 space per 6 students 158 Educational Institutions – General (Office) TSF 6,341 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet 26 Community & Religious Assembly (Auditorium) Seats 999 0.333 spaces per seat 333 Total 585 Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040 TSF –thousand square feet There are currently 319 parking spaces provided at the site for use by the High School. This is consistent with a 1996 parking study conducted for the site and approved by the City of Anaheim as part of a variance to permit the school to provide fewer parking spaces than required by code. Based on the City’s minimum parking requirement, there is currently a deficit of 256 off-street parking spaces at the project site. This parking study is being conducted to support the proposed project and determine if the existing parking supply remains adequate for the school site. 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 8 - 5.0 Existing Site Parking Survey 5.1 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL PARKING SURVEY A parking survey was conducted at the project site on a Thursday to capture existing parking demand during the school day and after the regular school day when after school sports activities occur. In this case, a junior varsity football game was scheduled on site, as were regular practices for other sports. The number of vehicles parking in the main student lot, staff lot and an additional off-street parking location was collected for an entire day to capture the peak period. This weekday parking space occupancy count was conducted at the project site for a typical school day on Thursday, October 18th 2012 from 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The results are summarized in Table 5-1, and the detailed occupancy data sheets are provided in the Appendix. Figure 5.1 illustrates the on- site parking area. Table 5-1: Servite High School On-Site Parking Occupancy Time Peek Weekday Parked Vehicles % Occupancy 6:00 AM 87 27% 7:00 AM 191 60% 8:00 AM 308 97% 9:00 AM 313 98% 10:00 AM 310 97% 11:00 AM 315 99% 12:00 PM 317 99% 1:00 PM 314 98% 2:00 PM 315 99% 3:00 PM 302 95% 4:00 PM 309 97% 5:00 PM 261 82% 6:00 PM 93 29% Maximum weekday utilization of the project site occurred at 12:00 p.m. At that time, 317 of the 319 spaces contained parked vehicles, a parking occupancy rate of 99 percent (99%). 1952 West La Palma Avenue Servite High School Parking Study November 2012 Figure 5.1 – Existing Project Site Parking Area Servite High School Student Parking – 319 Spaces Witchita StreetLa Palma Avenue 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 10 - 6.0 Methodology of Study The Project would result in no additional building square footage. Per the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, the minimum number of parking spaces required for this use is 575 total spaces. The project site provides 319 parking spaces, which is fewer spaces than the minimum parking requirement. However, a 1996 parking variance allows for the parking spaces assigned to the auditorium to be excluded from the required number of spaces at Servite High School. This variance was approved by the City of Anaheim as the auditorium is used by students and use of the facility does not result in combined parking demand beyond the student demand. When excluding the auditorium parking requirement, the total number of parking spaces required by code is 242. The proposed improvements will not change the number of students attending the school and will not change during or after school activities in terms of demand or utilization. The improvements are only focused on improving the condition and function of existing facilities. Parking Demand Survey and Actual Parking Demand A parking survey of the site was conducted to determine actual parking demand for the proposed project at Servite High School. A parking survey was conducted on a Thursday to capture during school and afterschool activity between 6:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. The results show that peak parking occupancy occurs at 12:00 p.m. on a typical school day with occupancy of 317 spaces (99%). This translates to a peak demand parking rate of about 1 space for every 4 students on a typical school day in the student lot. Staff and non-office employee lots are excluded from this occupancy ratio. The results of this parking survey show that parking demand nearly equals the available number of parking spaces provided in the student lot. The non-office employees and staff lots provide sufficient parking. Comparison of City Parking Requirement and Observed Demand A comparison of the city’s parking requirement and the observed demand rate by the parking survey is summarized in Table 6-1 below. The city requirements are shown with and without the required Auditorium parking requirement. Table 6-1: Parking Generation Comparison School Facility Quantity City of Anaheim Zoning Requirements Observed Parking Survey With Auditorium Without Auditorium Weekday Non-Office Employees 58 people 58 58 58 Students 950 students 158 158 233 Office 6,341 (sq. ft.) 26 26 26 Auditorium 999 seats 333 0 N/A Total N/A 575 242 317 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 11 - The current code requires 575 parking spaces based on office square footage, non-office staff, number of auditorium seats and number of students. However a parking variance granted in 1996 is applied to this parking study to allow for the auditorium parking requirements to be removed from the required number of parking spaces. This is acceptable as it is a shared use among students and additional vehicles would not be required to use the auditorium facilities. The parking variance granted in 1996 allocated for about 3.5 students per 1 parking space based on a maximum of 850 student enrollment. Currently, 950 students are enrolled at Servite High School resulting in a student to parking space ratio of 4 spaces per student. Therefore the ratio of students to parking spaces has been relatively constant allowing for the variance to still hold validity for the current enrollment. The project is not expected to generate additional parking demand, while the number of parking spaces will increase by 25 spaces to 344 parking spaces. 1952 West La Palma Avenue Servite High School Parking Study November 2012 130 125 METALRAMPMETALRAMPSTEPSTEPMISC MISC MISC MISC MISC TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES POOL POOLPOOLPOOL DENSE TREES DENSE DENSE TREES DENSETREES DENSEDENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASP CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONCCONC CONCCONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC ONC CONC . . . ... ... . . . . MISC MISC MISC MISC POOL TREES TREES TREESTREESTREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSETREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSE TREES DENSETREES ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH ASPHASPH ASPH ASPH ASPH CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC CONC C .. . . . . . . . . . TREES 18.5'WIDEC/L GATE8'WIDEC/L GATE8.5'WIDEC/L GATE4'WIDEC/L GATE8"WIDE BLOCK WALLSTAIRS 6'HIGH CLF6'HIGH CLF6'HIGH CLF4'WIDEC/L GATE4'WIDEC/L GATE 3'WIDEC/L GATE4'HIGH CLF 4'HIGH CLF 6'WIDEC/L GATE C/L GATE10'WIDE 4'HIGH CLF 6'HIGH CLF20'WIDEC/L GATE 8"WIDE SCREEN WALL 6"WIDE SCREEN WALL 6"WIDE SCREEN WALL CONC CONCCONC CONC CONCCONCCONC CONC ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS ARTIFICIAL GRASS OH-WIRES OH-WIRES OH-WIRESOH-WIRES30'WIDEC/L DWY30'WIDEC/L DWY19.5'WIC/L DW15'WIDEC/L GATE CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAY CONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAY3'WIDE V-GUTTER3'WIDE V-GUTTER3'WIDE V-GUTTER15.5'WIDEC/L DWY STAIRS STAIRS STAIRS STAIRSSTEPS CANOPY DN DN DN DN DN DN DN DN EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDGEXISTINGBLDG MUSICGUITAR WR EXISTING STORAGE TEMPORARY FENCE LOCATION EXIISTING TOWER SCOREBOARD 30'HIGH FENCE 21 PARKING AQUATICCENTER BASEBALL COMPLEX 114' - 9 5/8"CENTER LINE OF KEYSTONE ST32' - 0"43' - 0"133' - 9"37' - 0"24' - 0"30'-0"R.O.W 8'-0"PARKWAY 4'-0"SIDEWALK 12'-0"SETBACK FROM R.O.W 30 PARKING SPACES 244 PARKING SPACES 20' - 0"20' - 0"20'-0"R 5 0'-0"R 5 0'-0 "20' - 0" EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDG 10 PARKING 25 PARKING SPACES 14 PARKING SPACES 24' - 0"EXISTINGBLDG 24' - 0" 3 COMPACTSERVICEPARKING NORTH Figure 6.1 Proposed Parking Areas Lot A: Student Lot Lot B: Staff Lot Lot C: Staff Lot Lot D: Staff Lot 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 13 - 7.0 Findings The variance granted in 1996 permits a lower parking requirement that is in agreement with the observed demand. Taking this variance in effect, the parking space requirements below apply. 7.1 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS • 18.42.110.0101: The variance under the conditions imposed will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation. The proposed project will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided. Servite High School is proposing to modernize the existing Aquatics Center, improve the existing baseball field and install field lighting. None of these projects will reduce the number off- street parking spaces provided to students, faculty or staff. There will not be any additional instructional building square footage added to the school and the project will not cause any existing parking spaces to be removed. • 18.42.110.0102: The Servite High School project will not increase demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The project will not increase demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. A parking survey conducted during typical weekday during peak operations at the project site shows that current parking demand is near capacity. However, the proposed project does not involve an increase in parking capacity at the site, and is not expected to generate additional parking demand that would be greater than the current parking supply. • 18.42.110.0103: The Servite High School project will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. Current parking utilization is near capacity, but the project is not expected to generate additional parking demand over and above the existing parking supply. • 18.42.110.0104: The Servite High School project will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided. The Servite High School Project will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking lot provided at the project site. The parking lot serving Servite High School provides 319 spaces. Parking surveys conducted as part of this study show that during peak parking occupancy, 317 of the spaces are expected to be occupied with the proposed project completed. • 18.42.110.0105: The Servite High School project will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The Servite High School project will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties along Wichita Street or Keystone Street in the immediate vicinity of the project site. The adjacent properties have separate access driveways. No additional queuing of vehicles is anticipated on Wichita Street or Keystone Street as a result of this project. 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study - 14 - 8.0 Recommendations and Conclusions Servite High School is planning a construction project to modernize the existing Aquatics Center, improve the existing baseball field, and install field lighting. This project is not expected to generate additional parking demand for the school and will not result in a change in enrollment figures. The proposed improvements are focused on enhancing the quality of the athletic facilities, but not increasing the anticipated use or parking demand generated by the facilities. Time of day usage of the facilities would remain consistent with the existing condition, with athletic practices and events occurring after the regular school day. The school subject to a previous approved parking variance granted in 1996, and this approved variance is assumed to be still valid considering the existing student population, staff and office space square footage. The observed ratio of parking demand per student is still consistent with the 1996 survey at one occupied student parking space per four students. In conclusion, the proposed project is not expected to generate additional parking demand at the existing site. The parking surveys show that the proposed project site would generate a peak parking occupancy of up to 317 parking spaces, which does not exceed the existing 319 parking spaces currently provided. No significant impacts to parking supply are anticipated from the proposed project. 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study APPENDIX PARKING SURVEY – WEEKDAY COUNT Servite High School1952 W La Palma Ave, Anaheim, CAPARKING STUDYNumber of Spaces Parking Lot600AM 700AM 800AM 900AM 1000AM 1100AM 1200PM 100PM 200PM 300PM 400PM 500PM 600PM244Student Lot (Green) 70 150 247 252 248 253 255 252 253 235 246 240 7875 Staff Lot (Blue) 17 41 61 61 62 62 62 62 62 67 63 21 15319 Total 87 191 308 313 310 315 317 314 315 302 309 261 93% Occupied 27% 60% 97% 98% 97% 99% 99% 98% 99% 95% 97% 82% 29% 1952 West La Palma Avenue – Servite High School Parking Study APPENDIX CITY OF ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE (APPLICABLE SECTIONS) Appendix Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study City of Anaheim Appendix F Water Quality Management Plan Appendix The Planning Center|DC&E December 2013 This page intentionally left blank. PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL AQUATIC CENTER BUILDING Anaheim, California Prepared For Servite High School 1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 714-774-7575 Prepared By Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. 2850 Inland Empire Blvd. Building B Ontario, California, 91764 909-581-0676 www.fuscoe.com Project Manager: Fred Irianto, P.E. Date Prepared: May 30th, 2013 Job Number: 3054.01 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Contents 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page i May 30, 2013 PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY PRELIMINARY WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (PWQMP) CITY OF ANAHEIM PUBLIC WORKS / ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT May 31, 2013 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Contents 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page ii May 30, 2013 WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN (WQMP) For: Servite High School TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2013.133 Prepared for: Servite high School 1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, Ca 92801 714-744-7575 Prepared by: Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. 2850 Inland Empire Blvd. Suite B Ontario, Ca 91764 909-581-0676 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Contents 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page iii May 30, 2013 OWNER’S CERTIFICATION WATER QUALITY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR PERMIT/PLANNING APPLICATION NUMBER PRE2012-00004(DEV2012-00053) & TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NUMBER 2013-133 This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for Servite High School by Fuscoe Engineering, Inc. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the City of Anaheim, Public Works Department, Development Services Division, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2013-133 Site Development Permit/Application Number 2012-00053, requiring the preparation of a Water Quality Management Plan. The undersigned is aware that Best Management Practices (BMPs) are enforceable pursuant to the City’s Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 10.09. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the current Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the intent of the non-point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region Stormwater Runoff Management Program. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors-in-interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. An appropriate number of approved and signed copies of this document shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity. Signed: Name: James M. Carter Title: Vice President of Finance and Operations Company: Servite High School Address: 1952 West La Palma Avenue Telephone #: 714-774-7575 Date: May 30, 2013 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Contents 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page iv May 30, 2013 Contents Section I Discretionary Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions ..................................................... 1 Section II Project Description .......................................................................................................... 3 Section III Site Description ............................................................................................................... 7 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) ............................................................................... 9 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs ......................................................... 15 Section VI Location Map, Plot Plan & BMP Details ......................................................................... 16 Exhibits 16 BMP Details ................................................................................................................................ 16 Section VII Educational Materials Included ................................................................................... 18 Attachments Attachment A ................................................................................................................... Owner’s Certification Attachment B …………………………………………………………Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Attachment C……………………………………………………………..…………….Educational Materials Attachment D……………………………………………………………BMP Calculations and Fact Sheets Attachment E………………………………………………………………. Orange County Reference Maps Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section I 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 1 May 30, 2013 Section I Discretionary Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions CUP2012-05650 (DEV2012-00053)PRE2012-00004 Development Standards and Fees: · Grading shall conform to requirements of Chapter 17.04 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Please submit the grading plan a Water Quality Management Plan to the Building Division of the Planning Department for review and approval as per their requirements. SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section II 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 3 May 30th, 2013 Section II Project Description The proposed project encompasses approximately 0.97 acres in the City of Anaheim. The project is bounded by Keystone Street to the north and Dogwood Avenue to the east, Wichita Street to the south and, Catalpa Avenue to the west. The project site is part of Servite High School Campus. The project area is located to the north of the Campus and consists of the construction of a new Aquatic Center Building, landscape areas and a parking lot to the west of the new building. As previously mentioned the project area is approximately 0.97 –acres and approximately 25% of the project area will be pervious in the form of landscape strips, planters and pervious pavement. This results in 75% of the project area as impervious. The construction of the Aquatic Center Building and parking lot includes the acquisition and demolition of 5 existing properties to the north of the existing High School Campus. Project Area: Pervious Area (ac or ft2) Pervious Area Percentage Impervious Area (ac or ft2) Impervious Area Percentage Pre-Project Conditions: 0.54ac 44% 0.54ac 56% Post-Project Conditions: 0.25 ac 25% 0.72ac 74% Building Summary: The project will include one building providing 29,619 square feet of space including the swimming pool. Landscape and Parking Landscaping will be provided as grassed areas with trees to the back of the building facing Keystone Avenue. Parking will be provided to the west of the proposed building and provide 21 stalls and will feature pervious concrete on parking stalls and drive aisles. Outdoor Activities, Materials Stored and Wastes Generated: Outdoor activities are not anticipated for this project. Any waste generated from maintenance activities will be disposed of properly. Wash water and other waste from maintenance activities is not to be discharged or disposed of into the storm drain system. Clippings from landscape maintenance (i.e. prunings) will be collected and disposed of properly off-site, and will not be washed into the streets, local area drains/conveyances, or catch basin inlets. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section II 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 4 May 30th, 2013 Potential Storm Water Pollutants The table below, derived from Table 2 of the Countywide Model WQMP Technical Guidance Document (May 2011), summarizes the categories of land use or project features of concern and the general pollutant categories associated with them. ANTICIPATED & POTENTIAL POLLUTANTS GENERATED BY LAND USE TYPE Priority Project Categories and/or Project Features General Pollutant Categories Suspended Solid/ Sediments Nutrients Heavy Metals Pathogens (Bacteria/ Virus) Pesticides Oil & Grease Toxic Organic Compounds Trash & Debris Detached Residential Development E E N E E E N E Attached Residential Development E E N E E E(2) N E Commercial/Industrial Development E(1) E(1) E(5) E(3) E(1) E E E Automotive Repair Shops N N E N N E E E Restaurants E(1)(2) E(1) E(2) E E(1) E N E Hillside Development >5,000 ft2 E E N E E E N E Parking Lots E E(1) E E(4) E(1) E E E Streets, Highways, & Freeways E E(1) E E(4) E(1) E E E Retail Gasoline Outlets N N E N N E E E Notes: E = expected to be of concern N = not expected to be of concern (1) Expected pollutant if landscaping exists on-site, otherwise not expected. (2) Expected pollutant if the project includes uncovered parking areas, otherwise not expected. (3) Expected pollutant if land use involves food or animal waste products, otherwise not expected. (4) Bacterial indicators are routinely detected in pavement runoff. (5) Expected if outdoor storage or metal roofs, otherwise not expected. Source: County of Orange. (2011, May 19). Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/ Preliminary and/or Project Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs). Table 2.1. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section II 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 5 May 30th, 2013 Pollutants of concern associated with Commercial/Industrial Developments: Suspended Solid/Sediments Nutrients Pesticides Oil & Grease Toxic Organic Compounds Trash & Debris Pollutants of concern associated with Parking Lots: Suspended Solid/Sediments Nutrients Heavy Metals Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) Pesticides Oil & Grease Toxic Organic Compounds Trash & Debris POLLUTANTS OF CONCERN Pollutant E = Expected to be of concern N =Not Expected to be of concern Additional Information and Comments Suspended Solid/ Sediment E Nutrients E Heavy Metals E Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) E Pesticides E Oil & Grease E Toxic Organic Compounds E Trash & Debris E Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section II 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 6 May 30th, 2013 Property Ownership./Management PROPERTY OWNERSHIP/MANAGEMENT Parking Areas Servite High School Landscaped Areas: Servite High School Open Space: Servite High School Buildings: Servite High School Structural BMPs: Servite High School SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section III 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 7 May 30, 2013 Section III Site Description Physical Setting: Planning Area/ Community Name: The project does not belong to any Planning Area or Community Address: 1952 West La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA Project Area Description: Located approximately 500-feet east of the intersection of West la Palma Avenue and Fairview Street in the City of Anaheim Land Use: School Zoning: Public and Special Purpose “T” Acreage: 0.97 ac Predominant Soil Type: Soil Type A based on sand and gravels. Soils with high infiltration rates and water transmission. Impervious Conditions: Existing: 56% Proposed: 74% Site Characteristics: Precipitation Zone: 0.9 inches Topography: The project is currently developed and drains to the northerly towards Keystone Street. Drainage Patterns/Connections: Under proposed conditions the proposed storm water runoff from the project will sheet flow towards Keystone Avenue. Soil Type, Geology, and Infiltration Properties: The project site resides within an area of well drained sands or gravels soils (Type A) which exhibits low runoff potential and high infiltration rates and water transmission. Hydrogeologic (Groundwater) Conditions: Groundwater is found approximately 40-50 feet deep in this area. Geotechnical Conditions (relevant to infiltration): Soils report not available at this time. Off-Site Drainage: None Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section II 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 8 May 30th, 2013 Utility and Infrastructure Information: Dry and wet utilities will be incorporated into the proposed project and will tie into existing facilities within Keystone Street. Watershed Description: Receiving Waters: The project lies within City of Anaheim Drainage District Number BO1. Carbon Creek, Coyote Creek-San Gabriel River Reach 1, Los Alamitos Bay. 303(d) Listed Impairments: San Gabriel River Reach 1, per 2010 List: Oxygen, Dissolved, Coliform Bacteria Applicable TMDLs: TMDLs required by 2019 Pollutants of Concern for the Project: Suspended Solids/Sediments, Nutrients, Heavy Metals, Pathogens, Oil and Grease, Toxic Organic Compound, Trash and Debris Hydrologic Conditions of Concern (HCOCs): None. Streams located downstream from the project site are engineered, hardened and regularly maintained. Environmentally Sensitive and Special Biological Significant Areas: The project is not designated as an Environmentally Sensitive Area according t the OC DAMP. There are no areas of Special Biological Significance (ASBS) within the project site. SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section IV 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 9 May 30, 2013 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) Project Performance Criteria: Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub-regional basis? Yes No PROJECT PERFORMANCE CRITERIA Hydromodification Control Performance Criteria (Model WQMP Section 7.II-2.4.2.2) If a hydrologic condition of concern (HCOC) exists, priority projects shall implement onsite or regional hydromodification controls such that: Post-development runoff volume for the two-year frequency storm does not exceed that of the predevelopment condition by more than five percent, and Time of concentration of post-development runoff for the two- year storm event is not less than that for the predevelopment condition by more than five percent. LID Performance Criteria (Model WQMP Section 7.II-2.4.3) Infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire, or biotreat/biofilter, the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event (Design Capture Volume). LID BMPs must be designed to retain, on-site, (infiltrate, harvest and use, or evapotranspire) storm water runoff up to 80 percent average annual capture efficiency. Treatment Control BMP Performance Criteria (Model WQMP Section 7.II-3.2.2) If it is not feasible to meet LID performance criteria through retention and/or biotreatment provided on-site or at a sub- regional/regional scale, then treatment control BMPs shall be provided on-site or offsite prior to discharge to waters of the US. Sizing of treatment control BMP(s) shall be based on either the unmet volume after claiming applicable water quality credits, if appropriate. LID Design Storm Capture Volume 0.97 acres (on-site drainage areas) 74% impervious DCV = 2,234 ft3 Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section IV 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 10 May 30, 2013 Source Control BMPs The following tables show source control BMPs (routine non-structural and routine structural) included in this project and those that were not included. Routine Non-Structural BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants X Non-residential development N2 Activity Restrictions X N3 Common Area Landscape Management X N4 BMP Maintenance X N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply) X Not Anticipated N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance X Not Anticipated N7 Spill Contingency Plan X Not Anticipated N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance X Not Anticipated N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance X Not Anticipated N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation X Not Anticipated N11 Common Area Litter Control X N12 Employee Training X N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks X No loading docks N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection X No catch basins proposed N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots X N16 Commercial Vehicle Washing X Not Anticipated N2, Activity Restrictions The Owner shall develop ongoing activity restrictions that include those that have the potential to create adverse impacts on water quality. Activities include, but are not limited to: handling and disposal of contaminants, fertilizer and pesticide application restrictions, litter control and pick-up, and vehicle or equipment repair and maintenance in non- designated areas, as well as any other activities that may potentially contribute to water pollution. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section IV 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 11 May 30, 2013 N3, Common Area Landscape Management The Owner shall be responsible for ongoing maintenance and management of all landscaped areas on their property, consistent with OC DAMP Section 5.5, Management Guidelines for Use of Fertilizers as well as City standards. Program includes how to reduce the potential pollutant sources of fertilizer and pesticide uses, utilization of water- efficient landscaping practices, ongoing trimming and other landscape maintenance activities and proper disposal of landscape wastes by the owner and/or contractors. N4, BMP Maintenance The Owner will be responsible for the implementation and maintenance of each applicable non-structural BMP, as well as scheduling inspections and maintenance of all applicable structural BMP facilities through its staff, landscape contractor, and/or any other necessary maintenance contractors. Details on BMP Maintenance are provided in Appendix B of this WQMP. N11, Common Area Litter Control The Owner will be responsible for performing trash pick-up and sweeping of littered common areas on a weekly basis or whenever necessary, and proper disposal of waste collected. Responsibilities will also include investigating, noting and documenting improper disposal materials by the public. N12, Employee Training All employees and any contractors will require training to ensure that employees are aware of maintenance activities that may result in pollutants reaching the storm drain. Training will include, but not be limited to, spill cleanup procedures, proper waste disposal, housekeeping practices, etc. N15, Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Parking lots shall be swept quarterly at a minimum and prior to the rainy season, no later than October 1st each year. Routine Structural BMPs Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Include d Not Applicabl e Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage X Catch basins and areas drain are not proposed for this project Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction X No outdoor material storage areas are proposed. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section IV 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 12 May 30, 2013 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction X No trash enclosure areas are currently proposed at this preliminary design phase. Maybe revised in Final WQMP. Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control X Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation X No significant slopes or channels onsite. Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories (from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit) X a. Dock areas X No loading docks are proposed. b. Maintenance bays X No maintenance bays proposed. c. Vehicle wash areas X No vehicle wash areas proposed. d. Outdoor processing areas X No outdoor processing areas proposed. e. Equipment wash areas X No equipment wash areas proposed. f. Fueling areas X No fueling areas proposed. g. Hillside landscaping X The property does not reside on or near a hillside. h. Wash water control for food preparation areas X No water control food preparation areas proposed. i. Community car wash racks X No community car wash racks proposed. S4/SD-12, Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control The Owner will be responsible for the installation and maintenance of all common landscape areas utilizing similar planting materials with similar water requirements to reduce excess irrigation runoff. The developer will be responsible for implementing all efficient irrigation systems for common area landscaping including but not limited to provisions for water sensors and programmable irrigation cycles. The irrigation systems shall be in conformance with water use efficiency guidelines. Site Design BMPs The following table shows site design BMPs that are included in this project. A description of each BMPs follows: Minimize Impervious Area The project will increase impervious surfaces as compared to existing conditions. However, landscaping will be provided to the north of the building to direct flows from rooftops into landscaping features. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section IV 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 13 May 30, 2013 Minimized Directly Connected impervious Areas Landscaping will be provided adjacent to sidewalk along the proposed building. Low- flows and first-flush runoff will drain to pervious pavement on the adjacent parking lot. Preserve Existing Drainage Patterns and Time of Concentration The project is part of an existing developed high school and drainage patters are already set and won’t be change. Treatment BMPs The following table shows treatment BMPs that are included in this project. A description of each BMP follows: Treatment BMPs Name Included? If not applicable, state brief reason Yes No Vegetated (Grass) Strips X Another BMP has been selected Vegetated (Grass) Swales X Another BMP has been selected Proprietary Control Measures X Another BMP has been selected Dry Detention Basin X Another BMP has been selected Wet Detention Basin X Another BMP has been selected Constructed Wetland X Another BMP has been selected Detention Basin/Sand Filter X Another BMP has been selected Porous Pavement Detention X Porous Landscape Detention X Another BMP has been selected Infiltration Basin X Another BMP has been selected Infiltration Trench X Another BMP has been selected Media Filter X Another BMP has been selected Proprietary Control Measures X Another BMP has been selected Permeable Pavement INF-6 Permeable payment will used on the proposed parking lot to the west of the new aquatic Building. Permeable pavement, such as permeable pavers, grass pavers, porous concrete, and porous asphalt, provides a surface suitable for light-loads and parking areas in which water can drain through pore spaces to an underlying rock reservoir (approximately 1-2 feet deep) underneath. The sub-surface base allows for physical and microbial filtering Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section IV 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 14 May 30, 2013 processes to take place thereby removing pollutants such as particulates, organics, hydrocarbons and total suspended sediments, including attached heavy metals. The porous pavement sections proposed for the project site will have a reservoir depth of 7 inches to achieve the minimum required treatment design volumes for each drainage area. The BMP shall be located at parking stalls of both parking lots. It is generally acknowledged that this treatment BMP is effective in treating the following pollutants: sediment and turbidity, organic compounds, trash and debris, oxygen demanding substance, bacteria and viruses, oil and grease SUMMARY OF TREATMENT BMP SIZING-PERVIOUS PAVEMENT Location Dimensions Treatment Design Capacity West Parking Lot 40% Porosity 6” Gravel Reservoir Depth ~6,400 sf Surface Area 1,280cf SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section VI 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 15 May 30TH, 2013 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs It has been determined that Servite High School shall assume all BMP inspection and maintenance responsibilities for the Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building project. Contact Name: James M. Carter Title: Vice President of Finance and Operations Company: Servite High School Address: 1952 West La Palma Avenue Anaheim, CA 92801 Phone: 714-774-7575 Fax: Email: jcarter@servitehs.org Should the maintenance responsibility be transferred at any time during the operational life of Servite High School, such as when an HOA or POA is formed for a project, a formal notice of transfer shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim at the time responsibility of the property subject to this WQMP is transferred. The transfer of responsibility shall be incorporated into this WQMP as an amendment. The Owner shall verify BMP implementation and ongoing maintenance through inspection, self-certification, survey, or other equally effective measure. The certification shall verify that, at a minimum, the inspection and maintenance of all structural BMPs including inspection and performance of any required maintenance in the late summer / early fall, prior to the start of the rainy season. A form that may be used to record implementation, maintenance, and inspection of BMPs is included in Appendix D. The City of Anaheim may conduct verifications to assure that implementation and appropriate maintenance of structural and non-structural BMPs prescribed within this WQMP is taking place at the project site. The Owner shall retain operations, inspections and maintenance records of these BMPs and they will be made available to the City or County upon request. All records must be maintained for at least five (5) years after the recorded inspection date for the lifetime of the project. Long term funding for BMP maintenance will be provided by Servite High School. Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section VI 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 16 May 30th, 2013 Section VI Location Map, Plot Plan & BMP Details The exhibits provided in this section are to illustrate the post construction BMPs prescribed within this WQMP. Drainage flow information of the proposed project, such as general surface flow lines, concrete or other surface drainage conveyances, and storm drain facilities are also depicted. All structural source control and treatment control BMPs are shown as well. Exhibits Vicinity Map Conceptual Grading Plan WQMP Exhibit BMP Details INF-6: Permeable Pavement GNIREENE IGN f u l l c i r c l e t h i n k i n g tel 909.581.0676 fax 909.581.0696 www.fuscoe.com Ontario, California 91764 2850 Inland Empire Boulevard, Suite B Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section VI 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 17 May 30th, 2013 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section VII 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 18 May 30th, 2013 Section VII Educational Materials Included The educational materials included in this WQMP are provided to inform people involved in future uses, activities, or ownership of the site about the potential pitfalls associated with careless storm water management. “The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door” provides users with information about storm water that is/will be generated on site, what happens when water enters a storm drain, and its ultimate fate, discharging into the ocean. Also included are activities guidelines to educate anyone who is or will be associated with activities that have a potential to impact storm water runoff quality, and provide a menu of BMPs to effectively reduce the generation of storm water runoff pollutants from a variety of activities. The educational materials that may be used for the proposed project are included in Appendix C of this WQMP and are listed below. EDUCATION MATERIALS Residential Materials (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Materials (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips Other Materials (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) (http://www.cabmphandbooks.com) Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) DF-1 Drainage System Operation & Maintenance Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) C-10 Non-Stormwater Discharges Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) SC-11 Spill Prevention, Control and Cleanup Tips for Maintaining Septic Tank Systems SC-22 Vehicle and Equipment Repair Responsible Pest Control SC-34 Waste Handling and Disposal Sewer Spill SC-41 Building and Grounds Maintenance Tips for the Home Improvement Projects SC-43 Parking/Storage Area Maintenance Tips for Horse Care SC-44 Drainage System Maintenance Tips for Landscaping and Gardening SD-10 Site Design & Landscape Planning Tips for Pet Care SD-11 Roof Runoff Controls Tips for Pool Maintenance SD-12 Efficient Irrigation Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains SD-13 Storm Drain Signage Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section 600 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 19 May 30th, 2013 Tips for Projects Using Paint SD-31 Maintenance Bays & Docs Other: SD-32 Trash Storage Areas Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Servite High School New Aquatic Center Building Tentative Parcel map No. 2013-133 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Section 600 3054.01_WQMP_130529.doc Page 20 May 30th, 2013 APPENDICES Appendix A .............................................................................................. Owner’s Certification Appendix B ....................................................................... Notice of Transfer of Responsibility Appendix C .............................................................................................. Educational Materials Appendix D .........................................................................BMP Calculations and Fact Sheets Appendix E………………………………………………...... Orange County Reference Maps APPENDIX A OWNER’S CERTIFICATION APPENDIX B NOTICE OF TRANSFER RESPONSIBILITY APPENDIX C EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: The Tips contained in this brochure provide useful information about how you can keep materials and washwater from entering the storm drain system. If you have other suggestions for how water and materials may be contained, please contact your city’s stormwater representative or call the Orange County Stormwater Program. Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar C lean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays, and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities can lead to water pollution if you’re not careful. Materials and excess concrete or mortar can be blown or washed into the storm drains that flow to the ocean. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never throw building materials into the ocean, so don’t let them enter the storm drains. Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com. To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Reporting Hotline at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Never allow materials or washwater to enter the street or storm drain. Before the Project • Schedule projects for dry weather. • Store materials under cover, with temporary roofs or plastic sheets, to eliminate or reduce the possibility that the materials can be carried from the project site to streets, storm drains or adjacent properties via rainfall, runoff or wind. • Minimize waste by ordering only the amount of materials needed to complete the job. • Take measures to block nearby storm drain inlets. During the Project • Set up and operate small mixers on tarps or heavy drop cloths. • Do not mix more fresh concrete or cement than is needed for the job. • When breaking up pavement, pick up all chunks and pieces and recycle them at a local construction and demolition recycling company. (See information to the right) • When making saw cuts in pavement, protect nearby storm drain inlets during the saw-cutting operation and contain the slurry. Collect the slurry residue from the pavement or gutter and remove from the site. Clean-Up • Dispose of small amounts of dry concrete, grout or mortar in the trash. • Never hose materials from exposed aggregate concrete, asphalt or similar treatments into a street, gutter, parking lot, or storm drain. • Wash concrete mixers and equipment in designated washout areas where the water can flow into a containment area or onto dirt. Small amounts of dried material can be disposed of in the trash. Large amounts should be recycled at a local construction and demolition recycling company. (See information below) • Recycle cement wash water by pumping it back into cement mixers for reuse. Spills • Never hose down pavement or impermeable surfaces where fluids have spilled. Use an absorbent material such as cat litter to soak up a spill, then sweep and dispose in the trash. • Clean spills on dirt areas by digging up and properly disposing of contaminated dry soil in trash. • Immediately report significant spills to the County’s 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 714-567-6363 or log onto the County’s website at www.ocwatersheds.com and fill out an incident reporting form. For a list of construction and demolition recycling locations in your area visit www.ciwmb.ca.gov/Recycle/. For additional information on how to control, prevent, remove, and reduce pollution refer to the Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook, available on-line at www.cabmphandbooks.com. Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com UCCE Master Gardener Hotline: (714) 708-1646 To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. The tips contained in this brochure provide useful information to help prevent water pollution while landscaping or gardening. If you have other suggestions, please contact your city’s stormwater representatives or call the Orange County Stormwater Program. C lean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many common activities can lead to water pollution if you’re not careful. Fertilizers, pesticides and other chemicals that are left on yards or driveways can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Overwatering lawns can also send materials into storm drains. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour gardening products into the ocean, so don’t let them enter the storm drains. Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Printed on Recycled Paper Tips for Landscape and GardeningTips for Landscape & Gardening Never allow gardening products or polluted water to enter the street, gutter or storm drain. General Landscaping Tips Protect stockpiles and materials from wind and rain by storing them under tarps or secured plastic sheeting. Prevent erosion of slopes by planting fast-growing, dense ground covering plants. These will shield and bind the soil. Plant native vegetation to reduce the amount of water, fertilizers, and pesticide applied to the landscape. Never apply pesticides or fertilizers when rain is predicted within the next 48 hours. Garden & Lawn Maintenance Do not overwater. Use irrigation practices such as drip irrigation, soaker hoses or micro spray systems. Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers. Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain. Instead, dispose of green waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or recycling it through your city’s program. Use slow-release fertilizers to minimize leaching, and use organic fertilizers. Read labels and use only as directed. Do not over-apply pesticides or fertilizers. Apply to spots as needed, rather than blanketing an entire area. Store pesticides, fertilizers and other chemicals in a dry covered area to prevent exposure that may result in the deterioration of containers and packaging. Rinse empty pesticide containers and re-use rinse water as you would use the product. Do not dump rinse water down storm drains. Dispose of empty containers in the trash. When available, use non-toxic alternatives to traditional pesticides, and use pesticides specifically designed to control the pest you are targeting. For more information, visit www.ipm.ucdavis.edu. If fertilizer is spilled, sweep up the spill before irrigating. If the spill is liquid, apply an absorbent material such as cat litter, and then sweep it up and dispose of it in the trash. Take unwanted pesticides to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center to be recycled. Locations are provided below. Household Hazardous Waste Collection Centers Anaheim: 1071 N. Blue Gum St. Huntington Beach: 17121 Nichols St. Irvine: 6411 Oak Canyon San Juan Capistrano: 32250 La Pata Ave. For more information, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www.oclandfills.com For more information, please call the Orange County Stormwater Program at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) or visit www.ocwatersheds.com To report a spill, call the Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline at 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455). For emergencies, dial 911. Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door PROJECT PREVENTION Help Prevent Ocean Pollution: Preventing water pollution at your commercial/industrial site Clean beaches and healthy creeks, rivers, bays and ocean are important to Orange County. However, many landscape and building maintenance activities can lead to water pollution if you’re not careful. Paint, chemicals, plant clippings and other materials can be blown or washed into storm drains that flow to the ocean. Unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks and toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways. You would never pour soap or fertilizers into the ocean, so why would you let them enter the storm drains? Follow these easy tips to help prevent water pollution. Some types of industrial facilities are required to obtain coverage under the State General Industrial Permit. For more information visit: www.swrcb.ca.gov/stormwater/industrial.html Printed on Recycled Paper Tips for Pool Maintenance Call your trash hauler to replace leaking dumpsters. Do not dump any toxic substance or liquid waste on the pavement, the ground, or near a storm drain. Even materials that seem harmless such as latex paint or biodegradable cleaners can damage the environment. Recycle paints, solvents and other materials. For more information about recycling and collection centers, visit www.oclandfills.com. Store materials indoors or under cover and away from storm drains. Use a construction and demolition recycling company to recycle lumber, paper, cardboard, metals, masonry, carpet, plastic, pipes, drywall, rocks, dirt, and green waste. For a listing of construction and demolition recycling locations in your area, visit www.ciwmb.ca.gov/recycle. Properly label materials. Familiarize employees with Material Safety Data Sheets. Landscape Maintenance Compost grass clippings, leaves, sticks and other vegetation, or dispose of it at a permitted landfill or in green waste containers. Do not dispose of these materials in the street, gutter or storm drain. Irrigate slowly and inspect the system for leaks, overspraying and runoff. Adjust automatic timers to avoid overwatering. Follow label directions for the use and disposal of fertilizers and pesticides. Do not apply pesticides or fertilizers if rain is expected within 48 hours or if wind speeds are above 5 mph. Do not spray pesticides within 100 feet of waterways. Fertilizers should be worked into the soil rather than dumped onto the surface. If fertilizer is spilled on the pavement or sidewalk, sweep it up immediately and place it back in the container. Building Maintenance Never allow washwater, sweepings or sediment to enter the storm drain. Sweep up dry spills and use cat litter, towels or similar materials to absorb wet spills. Dispose of it in the trash. If you wash your building, sidewalk or parking lot, you must contain the water. Use a shop vac to collect the water and contact your city or sanitation agency for proper disposal information. Do not let water enter the street, gutter or storm drain. Use drop cloths underneath outdoor painting, scraping, and sandblasting work, and properly dispose of materials in the trash. Use a ground cloth or oversized tub for mixing paint and cleaning tools. Use a damp mop or broom to clean floors. Cover dumpsters to keep insects, animals, rainwater and sand from entering. Keep the area around the dumpster clear of trash and debris. Do not overfill the dumpster. PROJECT PREVENTION Proper Maintenance Practices for your Business Never Dispose of Anything in the Storm Drain. For More Information Aliso Viejo (949) 425-2535 Anaheim Public Works Operations (714) 765-6860 Brea Engineering (714) 990-7666 Buena Park Public Works (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services (714) 754-5323 Cypress Public Works (714) 229-6740 Dana Point Public Works (949) 248-3584 Fountain Valley Public Works (714) 593-4441 Fullerton Engineering Dept (714) 738-6853 Garden Grove Public Works (714) 741-5956 Huntington Beach Public Works (714) 536-5431 Irvine Public Works (949) 724-6315 La Habra Public Services (562) 905-9792 La Palma Public Works (714) 690-3310 Laguna Beach Water Quality (949) 497-0378 Laguna Hills Public Services (949) 707-2650 Laguna Niguel Public Works (949) 362-4337 Laguna Woods Public Works (949) 639-0500 Lake Forest Public Works (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community Dev (562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo Public Works (949) 470-3056 Newport Beach, Code & Water Quality Enforcement (949) 644-3215 Orange Public Works (714) 532-6480 Placentia Public Works (714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita (949) 635-1800 San Clemente Environmental Programs (949) 361-6143 San Juan Capistrano Engineering (949) 234-4413 Santa Ana Public Works (714) 647-3380 Seal Beach Engineering (562) 431-2527 x317 Stanton Public Works (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Works/Engineering (714) 573-3150 Villa Park Engineering (714) 998-1500 Westminster Public Works/Engineering (714) 898-3311 x446 Yorba Linda Engineering (714) 961-7138 Orange County Stormwater Program (877) 897-7455 Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) On-line Water Pollution Problem Reporting Form w w w o c w a t e r s h e d s c o m The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door California Environmental Protection Agency www calepa ca gov • Air Resources Board www arb ca gov • Department of Pesticide Regulation www cdpr ca gov • Department of Toxic Substances Control www dtsc ca gov • Integrated Waste Management Board www ciwmb ca gov • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment www oehha ca gov • State Water Resources Control Board www waterboards ca gov Earth 911 - Community-Specific Environmental Information 1-800-cleanup or visit www 1800cleanup org Health Care Agency’s Ocean and Bay Water Closure and Posting Hotline (714) 433-6400 or visit www ocbeachinfo com Integrated Waste Management Dept. of Orange County (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com for information on household hazardous waste collection centers, recycling centers and solid waste collection O.C. Agriculture Commissioner (714) 447-7100 or visit www ocagcomm com Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook Visit www cabmphandbooks com UC Master Gardener Hotline (714) 708-1646 or visit www uccemg com Did You Know? Most people believe that the largest source of water pollution in urban areas comes from specific sources such as factories and sewage treatment plants In fact, the largest source of water pollution comes from city streets, neighborhoods, construction sites and parking lots This type of pollution is sometimes called “non-point source” pollution There are two types of non-point source pollution: stormwater and urban runoff pollution Stormwater runoff results from rainfall When rainstorms cause large volumes of water to rinse the urban landscape, picking up pollutants along the way Urban runoff can happen any time of the year when excessive water use from irrigation, vehicle washing and other sources carries trash, lawn clippings and other urban pollutants into storm drains Where Does It Go? Anything we use outside homes, vehicles and businesses – like motor oil, paint, pesticides, fertilizers and cleaners – can be blown or washed into storm drains A little water from a garden hose or rain can also send materials into storm drains Storm drains are separate from our sanitary sewer systems; unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks or toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways Printed on Recycled Paper The Orange County Stormwater Program has created and moderates an electronic mailing list to facilitate communications, take questions and exchange ideas among its users about issues and topics related to stormwater and urban runoff and the implementation of program elements To join the list, please send an email to ocstormwaterinfo-join@list ocwatersheds com Orange County Stormwater Program Even if you live miles from the Pacific Ocean, you may be unknowingly polluting it.Sources of Non-Point Source Pollution Automotive leaks and spills Improper disposal of used oil and other engine fluids Metals found in vehicle exhaust, weathered paint, rust, metal plating and tires Pesticides and fertilizers from lawns, gardens and farms Improper disposal of cleaners, paint and paint removers Soil erosion and dust debris from landscape and construction activities Litter, lawn clippings, animal waste, and other organic matter Oil stains on parking lots and paved surfaces The Effect on the OceanNon-point source pollution can have a serious impact on water quality in Orange County Pollutants from the storm drain system can harm marine life as well as coastal and wetland habitats They can also degrade recreation areas such as beaches, harbors and bays Stormwater quality management programs have been developed throughout Orange County to educate and encourage the public to protect water quality, monitor runoff in the storm drain system, investigate illegal dumping and maintain storm drains Support from Orange County residents and businesses is needed to improve water quality and reduce urban runoff pollution Proper use and disposal of materials will help stop pollution before it reaches the storm drain and the ocean Dumping one quart of motor oil into a storm drain can contaminate 250,000 gallons of water. Follow these simple steps to help reduce water pollution: Household Activities Do not rinse spills with water Use dry cleanup methods such as applying cat litter or another absorbent material, sweep and dispose of in the trash Take items such as used or excess batteries, oven cleaners, automotive fluids, painting products and cathode ray tubes, like TVs and computer monitors, to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC) For a HHWCC near you call (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com Do not hose down your driveway, sidewalk or patio to the street, gutter or storm drain Sweep up debris and dispose of it in the trash Automotive Take your vehicle to a commercial car wash whenever possible If you wash your vehicle at home, choose soaps, cleaners, or detergents labeled non-toxic, phosphate- free or biodegradable Vegetable and citrus-based products are typically safest for the environment Do not allow washwater from vehicle washing to drain into the street, gutter or storm drain Excess washwater should be disposed of in the sanitary sewer (through a sink or toilet) or onto an absorbent surface like your lawn Monitor your vehicles for leaks and place a pan under leaks Keep your vehicles well maintained to stop and prevent leaks Never pour oil or antifreeze in the street, gutter or storm drain Recycle these substances at a service station, a waste oil collection center or used oil recycling center For the nearest Used Oil Collection Center call 1-800-CLEANUP or visit www 1800cleanup org Never allow pollutants to enter the street, gutter or storm drain! Lawn and Garden Pet and animal waste Pesticides Clippings, leaves and soil Fertilizer Common Pollutants Automobile Oil and grease Radiator fluids and antifreeze Cleaning chemicals Brake pad dust Home Maintenance Detergents, cleaners and solvents Oil and latex paint Swimming pool chemicals Outdoor trash and litter The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Trash Place trash and litter that cannot be recycled in securely covered trash cans Whenever possible, buy recycled products Remember: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Pet Care Always pick up after your pet Flush waste down the toilet or dispose of it in the trash Pet waste, if left outdoors, can wash into the street, gutter or storm drain If possible, bathe your pets indoors If you must bathe your pet outside, wash it on your lawn or another absorbent/permeable surface to keep the washwater from entering the street, gutter or storm drain Follow directions for use of pet care products and dispose of any unused products at a HHWCC Pool Maintenance Pool and spa water must be dechlorinated and free of excess acid, alkali or color to be allowed in the street, gutter or storm drain When it is not raining, drain dechlorinated pool and spa water directly into the sanitary sewer Some cities may have ordinances that do not allow pool water to be disposed of in the storm drain Check with your city Landscape and Gardening Do not over-water Water your lawn and garden by hand to control the amount of water you use or set irrigation systems to reflect seasonal water needs If water flows off your yard onto your driveway or sidewalk, your system is over-watering Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain Instead, dispose of waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or as green waste through your city’s recycling program Follow directions on pesticides and fertilizer, (measure, do not estimate amounts) and do not use if rain is predicted within 48 hours Take unwanted pesticides to a HHWCC to be recycled For locations and hours of HHWCC, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com Follow these simple steps to help reduce water pollution: Household Activities Do not rinse spills with water Use dry cleanup methods such as applying cat litter or another absorbent material, sweep and dispose of in the trash Take items such as used or excess batteries, oven cleaners, automotive fluids, painting products and cathode ray tubes, like TVs and computer monitors, to a Household Hazardous Waste Collection Center (HHWCC) For a HHWCC near you call (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com Do not hose down your driveway, sidewalk or patio to the street, gutter or storm drain Sweep up debris and dispose of it in the trash Automotive Take your vehicle to a commercial car wash whenever possible If you wash your vehicle at home, choose soaps, cleaners, or detergents labeled non-toxic, phosphate- free or biodegradable Vegetable and citrus-based products are typically safest for the environment Do not allow washwater from vehicle washing to drain into the street, gutter or storm drain Excess washwater should be disposed of in the sanitary sewer (through a sink or toilet) or onto an absorbent surface like your lawn Monitor your vehicles for leaks and place a pan under leaks Keep your vehicles well maintained to stop and prevent leaks Never pour oil or antifreeze in the street, gutter or storm drain Recycle these substances at a service station, a waste oil collection center or used oil recycling center For the nearest Used Oil Collection Center call 1-800-CLEANUP or visit www 1800cleanup org Never allow pollutants to enter the street, gutter or storm drain! Lawn and Garden Pet and animal waste Pesticides Clippings, leaves and soil Fertilizer Common Pollutants Automobile Oil and grease Radiator fluids and antifreeze Cleaning chemicals Brake pad dust Home Maintenance Detergents, cleaners and solvents Oil and latex paint Swimming pool chemicals Outdoor trash and litter The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Trash Place trash and litter that cannot be recycled in securely covered trash cans Whenever possible, buy recycled products Remember: Reduce, Reuse, Recycle Pet Care Always pick up after your pet Flush waste down the toilet or dispose of it in the trash Pet waste, if left outdoors, can wash into the street, gutter or storm drain If possible, bathe your pets indoors If you must bathe your pet outside, wash it on your lawn or another absorbent/permeable surface to keep the washwater from entering the street, gutter or storm drain Follow directions for use of pet care products and dispose of any unused products at a HHWCC Pool Maintenance Pool and spa water must be dechlorinated and free of excess acid, alkali or color to be allowed in the street, gutter or storm drain When it is not raining, drain dechlorinated pool and spa water directly into the sanitary sewer Some cities may have ordinances that do not allow pool water to be disposed of in the storm drain Check with your city Landscape and Gardening Do not over-water Water your lawn and garden by hand to control the amount of water you use or set irrigation systems to reflect seasonal water needs If water flows off your yard onto your driveway or sidewalk, your system is over-watering Periodically inspect and fix leaks and misdirected sprinklers Do not rake or blow leaves, clippings or pruning waste into the street, gutter or storm drain Instead, dispose of waste by composting, hauling it to a permitted landfill, or as green waste through your city’s recycling program Follow directions on pesticides and fertilizer, (measure, do not estimate amounts) and do not use if rain is predicted within 48 hours Take unwanted pesticides to a HHWCC to be recycled For locations and hours of HHWCC, call (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com For More Information Aliso Viejo (949) 425-2535 Anaheim Public Works Operations (714) 765-6860 Brea Engineering (714) 990-7666 Buena Park Public Works (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services (714) 754-5323 Cypress Public Works (714) 229-6740 Dana Point Public Works (949) 248-3584 Fountain Valley Public Works (714) 593-4441 Fullerton Engineering Dept (714) 738-6853 Garden Grove Public Works (714) 741-5956 Huntington Beach Public Works (714) 536-5431 Irvine Public Works (949) 724-6315 La Habra Public Services (562) 905-9792 La Palma Public Works (714) 690-3310 Laguna Beach Water Quality (949) 497-0378 Laguna Hills Public Services (949) 707-2650 Laguna Niguel Public Works (949) 362-4337 Laguna Woods Public Works (949) 639-0500 Lake Forest Public Works (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community Dev (562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo Public Works (949) 470-3056 Newport Beach, Code & Water Quality Enforcement (949) 644-3215 Orange Public Works (714) 532-6480 Placentia Public Works (714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita (949) 635-1800 San Clemente Environmental Programs (949) 361-6143 San Juan Capistrano Engineering (949) 234-4413 Santa Ana Public Works (714) 647-3380 Seal Beach Engineering (562) 431-2527 x317 Stanton Public Works (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Works/Engineering (714) 573-3150 Villa Park Engineering (714) 998-1500 Westminster Public Works/Engineering (714) 898-3311 x446 Yorba Linda Engineering (714) 961-7138 Orange County Stormwater Program (877) 897-7455 Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) On-line Water Pollution Problem Reporting Form w w w o c w a t e r s h e d s c o m The Ocean Begins at Your Front DoorCalifornia Environmental Protection Agency www calepa ca gov • Air Resources Board www arb ca gov • Department of Pesticide Regulation www cdpr ca gov • Department of Toxic Substances Control www dtsc ca gov • Integrated Waste Management Board www ciwmb ca gov • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment www oehha ca gov • State Water Resources Control Board www waterboards ca gov Earth 911 - Community-Specific Environmental Information 1-800-cleanup or visit www 1800cleanup org Health Care Agency’s Ocean and Bay Water Closure and Posting Hotline (714) 433-6400 or visit www ocbeachinfo com Integrated Waste Management Dept. of Orange County (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com for information on household hazardous waste collection centers, recycling centers and solid waste collection O.C. Agriculture Commissioner (714) 447-7100 or visit www ocagcomm com Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook Visit www cabmphandbooks com UC Master Gardener Hotline (714) 708-1646 or visit www uccemg com Did You Know? Most people believe that the largest source of water pollution in urban areas comes from specific sources such as factories and sewage treatment plants In fact, the largest source of water pollution comes from city streets, neighborhoods, construction sites and parking lots This type of pollution is sometimes called “non-point source” pollution There are two types of non-point source pollution: stormwater and urban runoff pollution Stormwater runoff results from rainfall When rainstorms cause large volumes of water to rinse the urban landscape, picking up pollutants along the way Urban runoff can happen any time of the year when excessive water use from irrigation, vehicle washing and other sources carries trash, lawn clippings and other urban pollutants into storm drains Where Does It Go? Anything we use outside homes, vehicles and businesses – like motor oil, paint, pesticides, fertilizers and cleaners – can be blown or washed into storm drains A little water from a garden hose or rain can also send materials into storm drains Storm drains are separate from our sanitary sewer systems; unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks or toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways Printed on Recycled Paper The Orange County Stormwater Program has created and moderates an electronic mailing list to facilitate communications, take questions and exchange ideas among its users about issues and topics related to stormwater and urban runoff and the implementation of program elements To join the list, please send an email to ocstormwaterinfo-join@list ocwatersheds com Orange County Stormwater Program Even if you live miles from the Pacific Ocean, you may be unknowingly polluting it.Sources of Non-Point Source Pollution Automotive leaks and spills Improper disposal of used oil and other engine fluids Metals found in vehicle exhaust, weathered paint, rust, metal plating and tires Pesticides and fertilizers from lawns, gardens and farms Improper disposal of cleaners, paint and paint removers Soil erosion and dust debris from landscape and construction activities Litter, lawn clippings, animal waste, and other organic matter Oil stains on parking lots and paved surfaces The Effect on the OceanNon-point source pollution can have a serious impact on water quality in Orange County Pollutants from the storm drain system can harm marine life as well as coastal and wetland habitats They can also degrade recreation areas such as beaches, harbors and bays Stormwater quality management programs have been developed throughout Orange County to educate and encourage the public to protect water quality, monitor runoff in the storm drain system, investigate illegal dumping and maintain storm drains Support from Orange County residents and businesses is needed to improve water quality and reduce urban runoff pollution Proper use and disposal of materials will help stop pollution before it reaches the storm drain and the ocean Dumping one quart of motor oil into a storm drain can contaminate 250,000 gallons of water. For More Information Aliso Viejo (949) 425-2535 Anaheim Public Works Operations (714) 765-6860 Brea Engineering (714) 990-7666 Buena Park Public Works (714) 562-3655 Costa Mesa Public Services (714) 754-5323 Cypress Public Works (714) 229-6740 Dana Point Public Works (949) 248-3584 Fountain Valley Public Works (714) 593-4441 Fullerton Engineering Dept (714) 738-6853 Garden Grove Public Works (714) 741-5956 Huntington Beach Public Works (714) 536-5431 Irvine Public Works (949) 724-6315 La Habra Public Services (562) 905-9792 La Palma Public Works (714) 690-3310 Laguna Beach Water Quality (949) 497-0378 Laguna Hills Public Services (949) 707-2650 Laguna Niguel Public Works (949) 362-4337 Laguna Woods Public Works (949) 639-0500 Lake Forest Public Works (949) 461-3480 Los Alamitos Community Dev (562) 431-3538 Mission Viejo Public Works (949) 470-3056 Newport Beach, Code & Water Quality Enforcement (949) 644-3215 Orange Public Works (714) 532-6480 Placentia Public Works (714) 993-8245 Rancho Santa Margarita (949) 635-1800 San Clemente Environmental Programs (949) 361-6143 San Juan Capistrano Engineering (949) 234-4413 Santa Ana Public Works (714) 647-3380 Seal Beach Engineering (562) 431-2527 x317 Stanton Public Works (714) 379-9222 x204 Tustin Public Works/Engineering (714) 573-3150 Villa Park Engineering (714) 998-1500 Westminster Public Works/Engineering (714) 898-3311 x446 Yorba Linda Engineering (714) 961-7138 Orange County Stormwater Program (877) 897-7455 Orange County 24-Hour Water Pollution Problem Reporting Hotline 1-877-89-SPILL (1-877-897-7455) On-line Water Pollution Problem Reporting Form w w w o c w a t e r s h e d s c o m The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door California Environmental Protection Agency www calepa ca gov • Air Resources Board www arb ca gov • Department of Pesticide Regulation www cdpr ca gov • Department of Toxic Substances Control www dtsc ca gov • Integrated Waste Management Board www ciwmb ca gov • Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment www oehha ca gov • State Water Resources Control Board www waterboards ca gov Earth 911 - Community-Specific Environmental Information 1-800-cleanup or visit www 1800cleanup org Health Care Agency’s Ocean and Bay Water Closure and Posting Hotline (714) 433-6400 or visit www ocbeachinfo com Integrated Waste Management Dept. of Orange County (714) 834-6752 or visit www oclandfills com for information on household hazardous waste collection centers, recycling centers and solid waste collection O.C. Agriculture Commissioner (714) 447-7100 or visit www ocagcomm com Stormwater Best Management Practice Handbook Visit www cabmphandbooks com UC Master Gardener Hotline (714) 708-1646 or visit www uccemg com Did You Know? Most people believe that the largest source of water pollution in urban areas comes from specific sources such as factories and sewage treatment plants In fact, the largest source of water pollution comes from city streets, neighborhoods, construction sites and parking lots This type of pollution is sometimes called “non-point source” pollution There are two types of non-point source pollution: stormwater and urban runoff pollution Stormwater runoff results from rainfall When rainstorms cause large volumes of water to rinse the urban landscape, picking up pollutants along the way Urban runoff can happen any time of the year when excessive water use from irrigation, vehicle washing and other sources carries trash, lawn clippings and other urban pollutants into storm drains Where Does It Go? Anything we use outside homes, vehicles and businesses – like motor oil, paint, pesticides, fertilizers and cleaners – can be blown or washed into storm drains A little water from a garden hose or rain can also send materials into storm drains Storm drains are separate from our sanitary sewer systems; unlike water in sanitary sewers (from sinks or toilets), water in storm drains is not treated before entering our waterways Printed on Recycled Paper The Orange County Stormwater Program has created and moderates an electronic mailing list to facilitate communications, take questions and exchange ideas among its users about issues and topics related to stormwater and urban runoff and the implementation of program elements To join the list, please send an email to ocstormwaterinfo-join@list ocwatersheds com Orange County Stormwater Program Even if you live miles from the Pacific Ocean, you may be unknowingly polluting it.Sources of Non-Point Source Pollution Automotive leaks and spills Improper disposal of used oil and other engine fluids Metals found in vehicle exhaust, weathered paint, rust, metal plating and tires Pesticides and fertilizers from lawns, gardens and farms Improper disposal of cleaners, paint and paint removers Soil erosion and dust debris from landscape and construction activities Litter, lawn clippings, animal waste, and other organic matter Oil stains on parking lots and paved surfaces The Effect on the OceanNon-point source pollution can have a serious impact on water quality in Orange County Pollutants from the storm drain system can harm marine life as well as coastal and wetland habitats They can also degrade recreation areas such as beaches, harbors and bays Stormwater quality management programs have been developed throughout Orange County to educate and encourage the public to protect water quality, monitor runoff in the storm drain system, investigate illegal dumping and maintain storm drains Support from Orange County residents and businesses is needed to improve water quality and reduce urban runoff pollution Proper use and disposal of materials will help stop pollution before it reaches the storm drain and the ocean Dumping one quart of motor oil into a storm drain can contaminate 250,000 gallons of water. APPENDIX D BMP CALCULATIONS AND FACT SHEETS TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-39 May 19, 2011 INF-6: Permeable Pavement (concrete, asphalt, and pavers) Permeable pavements contain small voids that allow water to pass through to a gravel base. They come in a variety of forms; they may be a modular paving system (concrete pavers, grass-pave, or gravel-pave) or poured in place pavement (porous concrete, permeable asphalt). All permeable pavements treat stormwater and remove sediments and metals to some degree within the pavement pore space and gravel base. While conventional pavement result in increased rates and volumes of surface runoff, properly constructed and maintained porous pavements, allow stormwater to percolate through the pavement and enter the soil below. This facilitates groundwater recharge while providing the structural and functional features needed for the roadway, parking lot, or sidewalk. The paving surface, subgrade, and installation requirements of permeable pavements are more complex than those for conventional asphalt or concrete surfaces. For porous pavements to function properly over an expected life span of 15 to 20 years, they must be properly sited and carefully designed and installed, as well as periodically maintained. Failure to protect paved areas from construction-related sediment loads can result in their premature clogging and failure. Feasibility Screening Considerations  Permeable pavement shall pass infiltration infeasibility screening to be considered for use.  Permeable pavements pose a potential risk of groundwater contamination; they may not provide significant attenuation of stormwater pollutants if underlying soils have high permeability. Opportunity Criteria  Permeable pavement areas can be applied to individual lot driveways, walkways, parking lots, low-traffic roads, high-traffic (with low speeds) roads/lots, golf cart paths, within road right-of- ways, and in parks and along open space edges. Impervious surfaces draining to the BMP are limited to surfaces immediately adjacent to the permeable pavement, rooftop runoff, and other nearby surfaces that do not contain significant sediment loads.  Soils are adequate for infiltration or can be amended to provide an adequate infiltration rate .  Infiltration is into native soil, or depth of engineere d fill is ≤ 5 feet from the bottom of the facility to native material and infiltration into fill is approved by a geotechnical professional. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Placement of BMPs should observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set-backs (e.g., foundations, utilities, roadways, etc) □ Minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater of 5 feet shall be observed. Permeable Pavement Source: Geosyntec Consultants Also known as:  Pervious pavement  Porous concrete  Pavers  Permeable asphalt TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-40 May 19, 2011 □ A biotreatment BMP should be provided for all runoff from off-site sources that are not directly adjacent to the permeable pavement, with the exception of rooftops. □ Permeable pavement should not be used for drainage areas with high sediment production potential (e.g., landscape areas) unless preceded by full treatment control with a BMP effective for sediment removal □ All aggregate used to construct permeable pavement shall be thoroughly washed before being delivered to the construction site. □ The top or wearing layer course (permeable pavement course) should consist of asphalt or concrete with greater than normal percentage of voids, or paving stones. □ A layer of washed fine aggregate (e.g., No. 8) just under the permeable pavement course may be installed to provide a level surface for installing the permeable pavement and also acts as a filter to trap particles and help prevent the reservoir layer from clogging . This layer can also act as interstitial media between pavers. □ Below this layer, the bedding and filter course course should be 1.5 to 3 inches deep and may be underlain by choking stone to prevent the smaller sized aggregate from migrating into the large aggregate base layer. □ The bedding, filter, and choke stone layers, as applicable, are referred to collecti vely as the bedding and filter course. □ The aggregate reservoir layer should be designed to function as a support layer as well as a reservoir layer the reservoir layer should be washed, open-graded No. 57 aggregate without any fine sands. □ The type of pedestrian traffic should be considered when determining which type of permeable pavement to use in particular locations (e.g., pavers may not be a good option for locations where people wearing high heels will be walking). □ An overflow device is required in the form of perimeter control or overflow pipes. This should generally be set at an elevation to prevent ponding of water into the bedding and filter course. Figure XIV.1: Schematic Diagram of Permeable Pavement without Underdrains TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-41 May 19, 2011 Simple Sizing Method for Permeable Pavement Permeable pavement that manages only direct rainfall and runoff from adjacent impermeable surfaces less than 50 percent the size of the permeable pavement are are not required to conduct sizing calculations. These areas are assumed to be self-retaining for the purpose of drainage planning.For permeable pavement with larger tributary area ratios, sizing calculations must be performed. If the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1 is used to size permeable pavement, the user calculates the DCV, designs the geometry required to draw down the DCV in 48 hours, then determines the area that is needed for the BMP. The area of the porous pavement itself as well as the area of the tributary areas should be considered in calculating the DCV. The sizing steps are as follows: Step 1: Determine Permeable Pavement DCV Calculate the DCV using the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1. Step 2: Determine the 48-hour Effective Depth The depth of water that can be drawn down in 48 hours can be calculated using the following equation: d48 = KDESIGN × 48 hours × 1 ft/12 inches Where: d48 = pavement effective 48-hour drawdown depth, ft KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) This is the maximum effective depth of water storage in the aggregate reservoir to achieve drawdown in 48 hours. Step 3: Determine the Aggregate Reservoir Depth The depth of water stored in the gravel reservoir should be equal or less than d48. Determine the reservoir depth such that: d48 ≥ (nR × dR) Where: d48 = trench effective 48-hour depth, ft (from Step 2) nR = porosity of aggregate reservoir fill; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dR = depth of trench fill, ft Step 4: Calculate the Required Infiltrating Area The required infiltrating area can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV / (nR × dR) Where: A = required footprint area, sq-ft DCV = design capture volume, cu-ft (see Step 1) nR = porosity of trench fill; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dR = depth of trench fill, ft This area is equal to the required pavement area. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-42 May 19, 2011 The ratio total tributary area (including the porous pavement) to the area of the porous pavement should not exceed 4:1. Capture Efficiency Method for Permeable Pavement If BMP geometry has already been defined and deviates from the 48 hour drawdown time, the designer can use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (See Appendix III.3.2) to determine the fraction of the DCV that must be provided to manage 80 percent of average annual runoff volume. This method accounts for drawdown time different than 48 hours. Option 1: Pavement Geometry is Predefined Step 1: Determine the Drawdown Time Associated with the Selected Pavement Geometry DD = ((nR × dR) / KDESIGN) × 12 in/ft Where: DD = time to completely drain pavement, hours nR = porosity of reservoir fill; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dR = depth of reservoir, ft KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) Step 2: Determine the Required Adjusted DCV for this Drawdown Time Use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (See Appendix III.3.2) to calculate the draw-down adjusted DCV that the basin must hold to achieve 80 percent capture of average annual stormwater runoff volume based on the pavement drawdown time calculated above. Step 3: Determine the Pavement Infiltrating Area Needed The required infiltrating area can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV/ (nR × dR) Where: A = required footprint area, sq-ft DCV = design capture volume, cu-ft (see Step 1) nR = porosity of reservoir fill; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dR = depth of reservoir, ft If the area required is greater than the selected pavement area, adjust reservoir depth and recalculate required area until the required area is achieved. Configuration for Use in a Treatment Train  Permeable pavement may be preceded in a treatment train by HSCs in the drainage area, which would reduce the runoff volume to be infiltrated by the permeable pavement  Permeable pavement areas can be designed to be self-retaining to lessen the pollutant and volume load on downstream BMPs. Additional References for Design Guidance  SMC LID Manual (pp 84): http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/guest75/pub/All_Projects/SoCal_LID_Manual/SoCalL ID_Manual_FINAL_040910.pdf TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-43 May 19, 2011  Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Stormwater Technical Manual, Chapter 5: http://www.laschools.org/employee/design/fs-studies-and- reports/download/white_paper_report_material/Storm_Water_Technical_Manual_2009-opt- red.pdf?version_id=76975850  City of Portland Stormwater Management Manual (Pervious Pavement, page 2-40) http://www.portlandonline.com/bes/index.cfm?c=47954&a=202883 San Diego County LID Handbook Appendix 4 (Factsheets 8, 9 & 10): http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/LID-Appendices.pdf City of Santa Barbara Storm Water BMP Guidance Manual, Chapter 6: http://www.santabarbaraca.gov/NR/rdonlyres/91D1FA75-C185-491E-A882- 49EE17789DF8/0/Manual_071008_Final.pdf County of Los Angeles Low Impact Development Standards Manual, Chapter 5: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wmd/LA_County_LID_Manual.pdf Permeable Pavement INF-6 Sizing Method for Permeable Pavement (Refer to Appendix XIV from the Technical Guide Document) 1. Determine Permeable Pavement DCV (See Worksheet B Appendix D) DVC=2,234 cu-ft 2. Determined the 48-hour Effective Depth (See Worksheet H Appendix D) = ∗ ∗ / = . / 3. Determined the Aggregate Reservoir Depth = . ( ) = ! (" ) ≥( ∗ ) ≥ (. ∗ !) . ≥ . 4. Calculate the required Infiltration Area = $%& = ,! . ! = ! Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet B: Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method Step 1: Determine the design capture storm depth used for calculating volume 1 Enter design capture storm depth from Figure III.1, d (inches) d= 0.90 inches 2 Enter the effect of provided HSCs, dHSC (inches) (Worksheet A) dHSC= 0 inches 3 Calculate the remainder of the design capture storm depth, dremainder (inches) (Line 1 – Line 2) dremainder= 0.90 inches Step 2: Calculate the DCV 1 Enter Project area tributary to BMP (s), A (acres) A= .97 acres 2 Enter Project Imperviousness, imp (unitless) imp= 0.74 3 Calculate runoff coefficient, C= (0.75 x imp) + 0.15 C= 0.705 4 Calculate runoff volume, Vdesign= (C x dremainder x A x 43560 x (1/12)) Vdesign= 2,234 cu-ft Step 3: Design BMPs to ensure full retention of the DCV Step 3a: Determine design infiltration rate 1 Enter measured infiltration rate, Kmeasured (in/hr) (Appendix VII) Kmeasured= 0.5 In/hr 2 Enter combined safety factor from Worksheet H, Sfinal (unitless) Sfinal= 2.25 3 Calculate design infiltration rate, Kdesign = Kmeasured x Sfinal Kdesign= 1.13 In/hr Step 3b: Determine minimum BMP footprint 4 Enter drawdown time, T (max 48 hours) T= 48 Hours 5 Calculate max retention depth that can be drawn down within the drawdown time (feet), Dmax = Kdesign x T x (1/12) Dmax= 4.52 feet 6 Calculate minimum area required for BMP (sq-ft), Amin = Vdesign/ dmax Amin= 495 sq-ft Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Worksheet H: Factor of Safety and Design Infiltration Rate Worksheet Factor Category Factor Description Assigned Weight (w) Factor Value (v) Product (p) p = w x v A Suitability Assessment Soil assessment methods 0.25 3 0.75 Predominant soil texture 0.25 1 0.25 Site soil variability 0.25 2 0.25 Depth to groundwater / impervious layer 0.25 1 0.25 Suitability Assessment Safety Factor, SA = Sp 1.50 B Design Tributary area size 0.25 1 0.25 Level of pretreatment/ expected sediment loads 0.25 1 0.25 Redundancy 0.25 3 0.75 Compaction during construction 0.25 1 0.25 Design Safety Factor, SB = Sp 1.50 Combined Safety Factor, STOT= SA x SB 2.25 Measured Infiltration Rate, inch/hr, KM (corrected for test-specific bias) 0.5 Design Infiltration Rate, in/hr, KDESIGN = STOT x KM 1.13 Supporting Data Infiltration rate has not been determined at this time. For calculations purposes a 0.5 in/hr min. infiltration rate has been used. Based on soils characteristics infiltration rate may be higher than 05. In/hr Note: The minimum combined adjustment factor shall not be less than 2.0 and the maximum combined adjustment factor shall not exceed 9.0. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx For all high concerns, assign a factor value of 3, for medium concerns, assign a factor value of 2, and for low concerns assign a factor value of 1. Table VII.3: Suitability Assessment Related considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors Consideration High Concern Medium Concern Low Concern Assessment methods (see explanation below) Use of soil survey maps or simple texture analysis to estimate short-term infiltration rates Direct measurement of ≥ 20 percent of infiltration area with localized infiltration measurement methods (e.g., infiltrometer) Direct measurement of ≥ 50 percent of infiltration area with localized infiltration measurement methods or Use of extensive test pit infiltration measurement methods Texture Class Silty and clayey soils with significant fines Loamy soils Granular to slightly loamy soils Site soil variability Highly variable soils indicated from site assessment or limited soil borings collected during site assessment Soil borings/test pits indicate moderately homogeneous soils Multiple soil borings/test pits indicate relatively homogeneous soils Depth to groundwater/ impervious layer <5 ft below facility bottom 5-10 ft below facility bottom >10 below facility bottom Localized infiltration testing refers to methods such as the double ring infiltrometer test (ASTM D3385-88) which measure infiltration rates over an area less than 10 sq-ft, may include lateral flow, and do not attempt to account for heterogeneity of soil. The amount of area each test represents should be estimated depending on the observed heterogeneity of the soil. Extensive infiltration testing refers to methods that include excavating a significant portion of the proposed infiltration area, filling the excavation with water, and monitoring drawdown. The excavation should be to the depth of the proposed infiltration surface and ideally be at least 50 to 100 square feet. In all cases, testing should be conducted in the area of the proposed BMP where, based on review of available geotechnical data, soils appear least likely to support infiltration. Worksheets from Orange County Technical Guidance Document (5-19-2011) See TGD for instructions and/or examples related to these worksheets www.ocwatersheds.com/WQMP.aspx Table VII.4: Design Related Considerations for Infiltration Facility Safety Factors Consideration High Concern Medium Concern Low Concern Tributary area size Greater than 10 acres Greater than 2 acres but less than 10 acres 2 acres or less Level of pretreatment/ expected influent sediment loads Pretreatment from gross solids removal devices only, such as Hydrodynamic separators, racks and screens AND tributary area includes landscaped areas, steep slopes, high traffic areas, or any other areas expected to produce high sediment, trash, or debris loads. Good pretreatment with BMPs that mitigate coarse sediments such as vegetated swales AND influent sediment loads from the tributary area are expected to be relatively low (e.g., low traffic, mild slopes, disconnected impervious areas, etc.). Excellent pretreatment with BMPs that mitigate fine sediments such as bioretention or media filtration OR sedimentation or facility only treats runoff from relatively clean surfaces, such as rooftops. Redundancy of treatment No redundancy in BMP treatment train Medium redundancy, other BMPs available in treatment train to maintain at least 50% of function of facility in event of failure. High redundancy, multiple components capable of operating independently and in parallel, maintaining at least 90% of facility functionality in event of failure. Compaction during construction Construction of facility on a compacted site or elevated probability of unintended/ indirect compaction. Medium probability of unintended/ indirect compaction. Heavy equipment actively prohibited from infiltration areas during construction and low probability of unintended/ indirect compaction. APPENDIX E ORANGE COUNTY REFERENCE MAPS Sant a A n a Ri v er Anaheim Lake Gilbert Retarding Basin Walnut Canyon Reservoir Miller Retarding Basin OCFCD Basin Raymond Retarding Basin Santa Ana RiverOCFCD Basin BALL RD GILBERT STSTATE COLLEGE BLVDSERR A N O R LA PALMA AVE MIRALO M A A V E SANTA ANA BROOKHURST STBEACH BLVDKNOTT AVEHARBOR BLVDLINCO L N A V E SUNKIST STLA PAL M A A V E ORANG E T H O R P E A V E EUCLID STF A IRMON T B L VD .MAGNOLIA AVEWESTERN AVEWEST STBROADWAY AVE.ACACIA STT U S T I N CHAPMAN AVE.9TH STNUTWOOD STDALE AVELA PALMA AVE LINCOLN WALNUT ST.ORANGE AVE. CRESCENT AVE. ROMNEYA DR DISNEYLAND DR.BROADW A Y SANTA A N A S T AVE. SYCAMO R E S TANAHEIM BLVDORANGEWOOD AVE. SOUTH S TEAST ST.RIO VISTA LVDKATELLA AVE.LEWIS ST.CERRITOS AVE.AVE.KRAEMER MILLER ST.CANY O N NOH L R A N C H RDR DIMPERIAL HWYCAN Y O N RIM R D WEIR RDMANCHESTER B LVD BLVDCANYON Imperial HwyCerritos Ave Ball Rd Orange Ave Chapman Ave Orangewood Ave Katella Ave Weir Canyon RdFairmont BlvdKellogg DrLakeview AveJefferson StTustin AveMiller StKraemer BlvdHarbor BlvdEast StLemon StState College BlvdEuclid StLincoln Ave Crescent Ave La Palma Ave Orangethorpe Ave Beach BlvdGilbert StMagnolia AveDale AveWestern AveKnott StBrookhurst St55 FRWYSanta Ana Canyon RdGypsum Canyon RdCoal Canyon RdREV: JUNE 16 , 2003--NN No Scale Legend Watersheds Waterbodies Carbon Creek Los Alamitos/East Garden Grove/Bolsa Chica Lower Santa Ana River San Gabriel River/Coyote Creek MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 311 Project Name: Servite High School Project Location: The project area is approximately 15.8 acres, located on La Palma Avenue,between Euclid Street and Brookhurst Street Address: 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934-954 North Keystone Street CEQA Action: Mitigated Negative Declaration SCH No. N/A Entitlement Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650 Requests: Variance No. 2013-04957 Project Description: The applicant proposes to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements and to expand the existing Servite High School campus to include the demolition of four single family homes, construction of a new aquatics center and parking lot, reorientation of the existing baseball field with 30-foot high fencing and 10-foot high block walls, relocation of the music and weight room buildings, replacement lighting for the track and football field, consolidation of the five parcels along Keystone Street into the main school campus property, and Variance No. 2013-04957 to permit a reduced front yard setback along Keystone Street, fencing that is higher than permitted by Code, and less parking than required by Code 2 H:ICASES\General Plan Amendment\GPA2009-00475\NEW MNDIMMP.doc SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL EXPANSION PROJECT MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 311 SCH NO. ---- ........ Terms and Definitions: 1. Property Owner/Developer - Owner or developer of Servite High School. 2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing - Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed "environmental equivalent/timing" and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be done by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City's adopted Fee Schedule. 3. Timing - This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been complied with. For example, if the timing is "to be shown on approved building plans" subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance. 4. Responsibility for Monitoring - Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure. 5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures - The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored "Ongoing During Construction", the annual letter will review those measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the close of construction. 6. Building Permit - For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building or structural expansion or modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions to an existing structure or building. 3 H:ICASES\Genera/ Plan Amendment\GPA2009-00475\NEW MNDIMMP.doc MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM N0. 311 Mitigation Measure Number Timing Measure Responsible for Monitoring Completion I. AESTHETICS (d) 1 Prior to issuance of first Building Permit Prior to building permit approval, Servite High School shall submit detailed lighting plans to the City of Anaheim demonstrating light levels (horizontal and vertical) along adjacent residential property lines. Light levels that exceed 2.0 fc at any portion of a residential property line shall trigger the following offer: • Servite High School shall provide an offer to fund blinds, shutters or other means acceptable to the homeowners to block spillover light from entering ballfield-facing windows. This offer shall be made to the homeowners 60 days prior to and payment made at least 30 days prior to the first lighting of the field. A homeowner’s refusal to accept payment shall not be considered Servite’s failure to accomplish this mitigation requirement • The mitigation payment shall not exceed $2,000 per impacted residences • This mitigation applies to the following addresses, or as revised pursuant to the final lighting plans: 930, 924, 920, 914 and 910 N. Keystone and 1939 W. Catalpa Avenue V. CULTURAL RESOURCES (b and c) 2 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: • The archaeologist must be present at the pre- grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in 3 H:ICASES\Genera/ Plan Amendment\GPA2009-00475\NEW MNDIMMP.doc cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. • Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. • Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. • A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. 3 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: • The paleontologist must be present at the pre- grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. • Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. • Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. ATTACHMENT NO. 8 AQUATIC F.F.0' - 0"AQUATIC C. ROOF10' - 0"1A302CANOPY12' - 0"AQUATIC C. SITEWALL8' - 0"GREEN SCREEN ABOVE CMU WALLGREEN SCREENCMU WALLCANOPY4' - 2 11/16"ISSUE DATE:IBILandscape:name: Fong Hart Schneider+Partnersaddress: 31742 Coast Highway Laguna Beach, CA 92651Phone: 949-645-9444Fax: fax 949-715-7286GROUPARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612Phone 949-833-5588Fax 949-833-5511CLIENTPRIME CONSULTANTSEALCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERCOPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other thanauthorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractorsshall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of anyvariations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHK'D BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:consultantsealarchitect'sseal 1/8" = 1'-0"12/3/2012 2:47:25 PM1952 West La Palma Ave.Anaheim, California 92801A201AQUATIC CENTERELEVATIONSCheckerAuthor03/19/201229957SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL1952 West La Palma AvenueSERVITE HIGHSCHOOLAnaheim, California 92801 1/8" = 1'-0"1AQUATIC CENTER ELEVATIONREVISIONSNO. DATE APPRD. DESCRIPTION2AQUATIC CENTER WEST PERSPECTIVE3AQUATIC CENTER PERSPECTIVEATTACHMENT NO. 9 UPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPUA1002114' - 8"250' - 0"31' - 4"72' - 4"138' - 4"242' - 0"78' - 0"12' - 0"1ACBD29' - 0"12' - 4"8' - 0"16' - 0"50' - 8"2A302STORAGE33CONCESSION36POOL EQUIPMENTROOM6CHEMSTORAGE41CHEMSTORAGE8TOILET/SHOWER14GIRLS LOCKER15BOYS SHOWER21RESTROOMS12BOYS LOCKER31TEAM ROOM34ELECTRICAL42OFFICE29RESTROOMS16GIRLS SHOWER22CUST./SUPPLYS13MECH67114' - 8"5' - 6"20' - 0"73' - 4"17' - 4"24' - 0"45' - 0"10' - 0"32' - 0"9' - 0"EFGHIJKLM1A30232' - 0"234567891011121314151A201ISSUE DATE:IBILandscape:name: Fong Hart Schneider+Partnersaddress: 31742 Coast Highway Laguna Beach, CA 92651Phone: 949-645-9444Fax: fax 949-715-7286GROUPARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612Phone 949-833-5588Fax 949-833-5511CLIENTPRIME CONSULTANTSEALCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERNORTHCOPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other thanauthorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractorsshall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of anyvariations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHK'D BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:consultantsealarchitect'ssealAs indicated12/3/2012 2:48:52 PM1952 West La Palma Ave.Anaheim, California 92801A100AQUATIC CENTERFLOOR PLANCheckerAuthor03/19/201229957SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL1952 West La Palma AvenueSERVITE HIGHSCHOOLAnaheim, California 92801REVISIONSNO. DATE APPRD. DESCRIPTION 1/16" = 1'-0"1AQUATIC CENTER OVERALL FLOORPLAN 1/8" = 1'-0"2AQUATIC CENTER ENLARGED PLAN AQUATIC F.F.0' - 0"BASEBALL F.F0' - 0"2A302CANOPY12' - 0"AQUATIC C. SITEWALL8' - 0"GREENSCREENSIDE WALKPARKWAYSETBACK8' - 0"4' - 0"12' - 3"CANOPYT.O. BLEACHERS4'-10"4' - 10"AQUATIC F.F.0' - 0"AQUATIC C. ROOF10' - 0"ACBDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVW1A302CANOPY12' - 0"AQUATIC C. SITEWALL8' - 0"ISSUE DATE:IBILandscape:name: Fong Hart Schneider+Partnersaddress: 31742 Coast Highway Laguna Beach, CA 92651Phone: 949-645-9444Fax: fax 949-715-7286GROUPARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612Phone 949-833-5588Fax 949-833-5511CLIENTPRIME CONSULTANTSEALCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERNORTHCOPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other thanauthorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractorsshall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of anyvariations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHK'D BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:consultantsealarchitect'sseal 1/8" = 1'-0"12/3/2012 2:44:43 PM1952 West La Palma Ave.Anaheim, California 92801A302AQUATIC CENTER -SECTIONSCheckerAuthor03/19/201229957SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL1952 West La Palma AvenueSERVITE HIGHSCHOOLAnaheim, California 92801REVISIONSNO. DATE APPRD. DESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1Section 10 1/8" = 1'-0"2Section 1 BASEBALL F.F0' - 0"T.O. BLEACHER7' - 0"BASEBALLBLEACHERS ROOF11' - 0"9' - 0"5' - 0"4' - 0"2' - 0"COOL ROOFCMU WALLBASEBALL F.F0' - 0"T.O. BLEACHER7' - 0"BASEBALL ROOF10' - 0"7' - 0"30' - 0"COOL ROOFCMU WALLBASEBALL F.F0' - 0"T.O. BLEACHER7' - 0"BASEBALL ROOF10' - 0"1A301AABBCCDDII5' - 9 3/4"6' - 11 1/2"CMU WALLSISSUE DATE:IBILandscape:name: Fong Hart Schneider+Partnersaddress: 31742 Coast Highway Laguna Beach, CA 92651Phone: 949-645-9444Fax: fax 949-715-7286GROUPARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612Phone 949-833-5588Fax 949-833-5511CLIENTPRIME CONSULTANTSEALCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERCOPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other thanauthorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractorsshall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of anyvariations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHK'D BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:consultantsealarchitect'sseal 1/8" = 1'-0"12/3/2012 2:45:45 PM1952 West La Palma Ave.Anaheim, California 92801A301BASEBALLCOMPLEX-SECTIONSCheckerAuthor03/19/201229957SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL1952 West La Palma AvenueSERVITE HIGHSCHOOLAnaheim, California 92801 1/8" = 1'-0"1Section 7 1/8" = 1'-0"4Section 32SECTION 3D 1/8" = 1'-0"3Section 4REVISIONSNO. DATE APPRD. DESCRIPTION UPUPUPUPUPUPUPUPDNDNUPUPUP74' - 2"72' - 0 1/2"R 13' - 0"R 13' - 0"R 13' - 0"R 13' - 0"84' - 0"84' - 0"6' - 0"2' - 8 23/32"3' - 3 9/32"PRESS BOX120' - 0 1/2"48' - 0"4A3013A301R 9' - 0"STORAGE52CIRCULATION68CONCESSION60TOILET57TOILET58TEAM ROOM51OFFICE63DUGOUT54DUGOUT55CIRCULATION6919' - 0"12' - 0"18' - 8"8' - 0"14' - 10"57' - 6"75' - 8"1A301PRESS BOX34' - 0"4' - 4"42' - 0"135' - 6"197' - 8"AABBCCDDII12' - 0"15' - 0"6' - 7 5/8"P.L.P.L.P.L.P.L.P.L.18' - 8"48' - 0"ISSUE DATE:IBILandscape:name: Fong Hart Schneider+Partnersaddress: 31742 Coast Highway Laguna Beach, CA 92651Phone: 949-645-9444Fax: fax 949-715-7286GROUPARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612Phone 949-833-5588Fax 949-833-5511CLIENTPRIME CONSULTANTSEALCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERNORTHCOPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other thanauthorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractorsshall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of anyvariations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHK'D BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:consultantsealarchitect'sseal 1/8" = 1'-0"12/3/2012 2:48:20 PM1952 West La Palma Ave.Anaheim, California 92801A102BASEBALL COMPLEXFLOOR PLANCheckerAuthor03/19/201229957SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL1952 West La Palma AvenueSERVITE HIGHSCHOOLAnaheim, California 92801REVISIONSNO. DATE APPRD. DESCRIPTION 1/8" = 1'-0"1ENLARGED BASEBALL COMPLEX 130125METALRAMPMETALRAMPSTEPMISCMISCMISCMISCMISCTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESPOOLPOOLPOOLPOOLDENSETREESDENSEDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSEDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESTREESDENSEASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONC.............MISCMISCMISCMISCPOOLTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESTREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSEDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHASPHCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCONCCONC............TREES18.5'WIDEC/L GATE8'WIDEC/L GATE8.5'WIDEC/L GATE4'WIDEC/L GATE8"WIDE BLOCK WALL6'HIGH CLF6'HIGH CLF6'HIGH CLF4'WIDEC/L GATE4'WIDEC/L GATE3'WIDEC/L GATE4'HIGH CLF4'HIGH CLF6'WIDEC/L GATEC/L GATE10'WIDE4'HIGH CLF6'HIGH CLF20'WIDEC/L GATE8"WIDE SCREEN WALL6"WIDE SCREEN WALL6"WIDE SCREEN WALLCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSARTIFICIAL GRASSOH-WIRESOH-WIRESOH-WIRESOH-WIRES30'WIDEC/L DWY30'WIDEC/L DWY19.5'WIC/L DW15'WIDEC/L GATECONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAYCONC WALKWAY3'WIDE V-GUTTER3'WIDE V-GUTTER3'WIDE V-GUTTER15.5'WIDEC/L DWYSTAIRSSTAIRSSTAIRSSTAIRSSTEPSCANOPYDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDNDENSETREESDENSETREESCONCNCTREESDENSETREESSEESDENSETREESCONCCONC18.5'WIDEC/L GATE8"WIDE BLOCK WALLCONCEXISTINGBLDGEXISTINGBLDGEXISTINGBLDGMUSICGUITARWREXISTINGSTORAGETEMPORARY FENCE LOCATIONEXIISTINGTOWERSCOREBOARD30'HIGHFENCELOT C- 21 STAFF PARKING (2ADA)AQUATICCENTERBASEBALLCOMPLEXCENTER LINE OF KEYSTONE ST24' - 0"30' - 0" R.O.W8' - 0" PARKWAY4' - 0" SIDEWALK12' - 0" SETBACK FROM R.O.WA0102LOB B -55 STAFF PARKINGLOT A261 PARKING SPACES20' - 0"20' - 0"20' - 0"R 50' - 0"R 50' - 0"20' - 0"EXISTINGBLDGEXISTINGBLDGEXISTINGBLDGLOT D10 STAFFPARKINGSPACES25 PARKING SPACES14 PARKING SPACES24' - 0"EXISTINGBLDG24' - 0"3 COMPACTSERVICEPARKINGGATEREQUIRED FIRE LANE20' - 0"P.L.BUILDING AREA 3,695 SFBUILDING TYPE: 5B1' - 6" P.L. SETBACK1' - 6" P.L. SETBACK FIRE HYDRANTFIRE HYDRANTFIRE HYDRANTFIRE HYDRANTFIRE HYDRANTFIRE HYDRANTFIRE HYDRANTCENTER LINE OF KEYSTONE ST18' - 0" TO CURB8' - 0"4' - 0"20' - 0" FROM R.O.W8' PARKWAY4' SIDEWALK4' - 0" MIN.30' - 0"8' - 0" PARKWAY4' - 0" SIDEWALK12' - 0" MIN. SETBACK FROM R.O.W5' - 0" NEW EASEMENTAQUATICCENTERPOOLELECTRICALYARDLOT C- 21 STAFFPARKING (2ADA)GATE24' - 0"RIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHT-OF-WAYRIGHT-OF-WAYLOCAL STREETDRIVEWAYSTD DETAIL NO. 114-ASTD DETAIL NO. 473STD DETAIL NO. 475DISABLEDPERSON'SPARKINGSTD DETAILNO. 436-GAQUATICCENTERBUILDINGBUILDING AREA: 4,555 sfTYPE: 5BPOOL SIZE: 55 m X 25 yd8' CMU WALL9' - 0" TYP.9' - 0"8' - 0"9' - 0"ISSUE DATE:IBILandscape:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners31742 Coast HighwayLaguna Beach, CA 92651Phone: 949-645-9444Fax: 949-715-7286Electrical Engineer:FBA Consulting Engineers3420 Irvine AvenueNewport Beach, CA 92660Phone:949-852-9995Fax:949-852-1657Civil Engineer:FUSCOE Engineering2850 Inland Empire Blvd, Suite BOntario, CA 91764Phone:909-581-0676Fax: 909-581-0696GROUPARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612Phone 949-833-5588Fax 949-833-5511CLIENTPRIME CONSULTANTSEALCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERNORTHCOPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other thanauthorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractorsshall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of anyvariations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHK'D BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:consultantsealAs indicated12/4/2012 10:47:13 AM1952 West La Palma Ave.Anaheim, California 92801A010CAMPUS SITE PLANCheckerAuthor03/19/201229957SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL1952 West La Palma AvenueSERVITE HIGHSCHOOLAnaheim, California 92801 1" = 50'-0"1OVERALL SITE PLAN-CITY SUBMITTAL 1/16" = 1'-0"2ENLARGED SITE PLAN-CITY SUBMITTALORNAMENTAL FENCEREVISIONSNO. DATE APPRD. DESCRIPTIONSERVITEHIGH SCHOOLVICINITY MAP HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21HV-3FNDRAMSETFNDCNAILSET MAG NAILCPSET FELT /XBLDG10612112317717918418518945.4517.8318.21128.9126.1126.4126.4126.5128.9127.1126.5127.7126.6127.5129.2126.8129.4130.4129.1127.4126.7129.1130.3129.3127.6126.7126.7128.5129.1129.1129.4127.8126.7129.5130.1130.2126.9130.2130.1130.1130.2126.8130.2130.3130.3130.5127.8126.7127.5160.8160.7161.8161.9156.7156.7156.7156.5156.4156.2156.3147.4147.4147.2156.9142.6142.7142.5142.4142.2142.3146.1146.1146.1142.8142.6142.7142.7142.7142.7141.8148.7148.7148.7148.7148.7144.3144.2144.3139.7139.7139.7139.8141.2141.6143.6158.4159.0159.4159.0158.0158.0158.0157.9154.2154.3154.4155.4154.7155.2154.2155.4155.4129.7130.6129.4130.7130.7130.6130.6128.5130.2130.3130.3130.5130.6127.5METALRAMPMETALRAMPSTEPSTEPTREESDENSETREESDENSETREESTREESDENSEASPHCONCCONC.MISCMISCTREESTREESTREESDENSEDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESDENSETREESASPHASPHASPHASPHCONCCONCCONCCONCCONC....18.5'WIDEC/L GATE8'WIDEC/L GATE8.5'WIDEC/L GATE4'WIDEC/L GATE8"WIDE BLOCK WALLSTAIRSCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCCONCASPH15.5'WIDEC/L DWYSTAIRSSTAIRSSTAIRSSTAIRSSTEPSCANOPYDNTVTTVTEETVTETVTETVTVTTEEETTVTVTE(E)U.P.(E)U.P.(E)S.L.(E)S.L.(E)S.L.(E)S.L.(E)U.P.NEW POOLNEW POOLEQUIPT/SHOWER/LOCKERBLDG.NEW MAIN SERVICE ENTRANCE SWITCHBOARD -EXACT LOCATION T.B.D.OUTDOOR, WEATHERPROOF(AQUATIC CENTER/BALL FIELDS/SPORTS LIGHTING)NEW CITY OF ANAHEIM P.U.D. TRANSFORMER(E)U.P.(E)OH TO REMAIN(E)OH TO REMAIN(E)OH TO REMAINREMOVE (E)OH LINESAND UTILITY POLESEXISTING CAMPUSBUILDING AREAELECTRICAL LOAD CALCULATION (EST.)LOAD TYPEWATTS PER SQUARE FOOTWATTS3,787.54LIGHTING311,362,62HVAC830,000.32SPORTS LIGHTING30,750.00POOL EQUIPMENT75,621.001,000.00BASEBALL FIELD BUILDINGS1616,000.00BASEBALL SPORTS LIGHTING30,750.00POWER518,937.70213,421.64OVERHEAD CABLE/CONDUCTORSUNDERGROUND CONDUITUTILITY POLEPULLBOX / VAULTELECTRICALETELEPHONETTELEVISIONTVEXISTING TO REMAIN(E)UTILITY POLEU.P.MAIN SERVICE ENTRANCE SWITCHBOARDPOWER CO. TRANSFORMERSYMBOL LISTLACIRTCELZAJICEKESTEPHENR.No. E 10372EFORPDERETSIGERAREENIGNELANOISS LIFORNIASTAT EOFCExp. 09-30-14Consulting EngineersT: 949 852 9995 F: 949 852 1657Newport Beach, California 92660-31893420 Irvine AvenueFBAFBA #FBAengr.comENGINEERINGISSUE DATE:IBIGROUPARCHITECTS ENGINEERS PLANNERS18401 Von Karman Avenue - Suite 110Irvine, California 92612Phone 949-833-5588Fax 949-833-5511CLIENTPRIME CONSULTANTSEALCONSULTANTSPROJECT TITLESHEET TITLESHEET NUMBERNORTHCOPYRIGHT 2010 IBI GROUPCOPYRIGHT:Any reproduction or distribution for any purpose other thanauthorized by IBI Group is forbidden. Written dimensionsshall have precedence over scaled dimensions. Contractorsshall verify and be responsible for all dimensions andconditions on the job and IBI Group shall be informed of anyvariations from the dimensions and conditions shown on thedrawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Group forapproval before proceeding with fabrication.SCALE:CHK'D BY:DRAWN BY:PROJECT NO:architect'sseal888.200As indicated11/29/2012 4:07:53 PM1952 West La Palma Ave.Anaheim, California 92801ES1.0CONCEPTUAL SITEELECTRICAL UTILITY PLANCheckerAuthor03/19/201229957SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL1952 West La Palma AvenueSERVITE HIGHSCHOOL - PHASE IAnaheim, California 92801 1" = 20'-0"1CONCEPTUAL SITE ELECTRICAL UTILITY PLANREVISIONSNO. DATE APPRD.DESCRIPTION 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 9 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: FEBRUARY 10, 2014 SUBJECT: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-00113 – ALLOWING ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MANUFACTURING, INCLUDING TASTING ROOMS, WITHIN COMMERICAL AND INDUSTRIAL ZONES LOCATION: Citywide APPLICANT: City of Anaheim REQUEST: This is a City-initiated amendment to Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to permit breweries and other alcoholic beverage manufacturing in commercial and industrial zones. The proposed Code changes also include the addition of standards and regulations for the operation of these uses. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, determine that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 15061(b)(3) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations on the basis that there is no possibility that the Zoning Code amendment may have a significant effect on the environment, and recommend to the City Council approval of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2013-00113. BACKGROUND: Within the last decade, the craft beer and microbrewery industry has seen increased growth nationwide. Locally, Anaheim has permitted more craft and micro-breweries than any other city in Orange County. The Mayor recently announced a “BrewCity” initiative aimed at strengthening Anaheim’s share of the microbrew industry by making it easier to establish such uses in the City. In the summer of 2013, the Mayor created a working group to evaluate how the City can make it easier for craft beer producers and other alcoholic beverage manufacturers to open businesses in Anaheim. This working group included City staff, Anaheim residents, local brewers, and members of the media. This group sought to identify ways to reduce Anaheim’s regulations as well as those imposed by the Orange County Environmental Health Agency. The City has approved four breweries with tasting rooms. Two of these businesses are open and have been in operation for over two years. These breweries attract small groups of craft beer connoisseurs seeking an artisan-style beer and community gathering place. These two breweries are located in different areas of the City; one in an isolated industrial area and the other in the Downtown area adjacent to residences and commercial businesses. Both of these breweries have operated in a ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-00109 July 1, 2013 Page 2 of 4 manner compatible with surrounding uses and were used as models while developing the proposed regulations. PROPOSAL: Following is a brief overview of the proposed Code changes. These changes were derived largely from staff’s experience reviewing the four breweries approved in Anaheim during the last four years and based on input received from the working group. An executive summary outlining the proposed modifications in greater detail is provided in Attachment 1 to the staff report. Land Use Definition: A new land use category and definition, “Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing,” is proposed to be added to the Zoning Code. This land use category would include manufacturing facilities for the production of beer, wine, and distilled spirits, in accordance with a valid alcohol production license issued by the State of California. By definition, this use would also allow a “tasting room.” A tasting room would be defined as an accessory use in a brewery, winery or distillery that only serves beverages produced at that location. Tasting room visitors would be allowed to consume alcoholic beverages on the premises and also purchase containers of alcohol for off-site consumption. As further described below, the size and hours of operation for tasting rooms would be limited. Permitted Land Uses: Specific land uses within the Zoning Code are categorized as permitted, conditionally permitted and prohibited. Historically, alcoholic beverage producing facilities were conditionally permitted and typically approved with a set of standard conditions of approval. The proposed Code Amendment would allow Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing, including tasting rooms, by right, in the General Commercial (C-G), Regional Commercial (C-R) and Industrial (I) zones. Together, these available zones represent 89 percent of all the City’s commercial and industrially zoned properties. This use would not be permitted in the Neighborhood Commercial (C-NC), Low Density Office (O-L) and High Density Office (O-H) zones. The Neighborhood Commercial zone is intended to support small, neighborhood-serving businesses such as small markets, barber shops, banks and specialty shops. The Office zones are intended to allow financial, real estate, medical and professional office uses. Staff does not believe that alcoholic beverage manufacturing is compatible with uses in these three zones. Although the proposed Code amendment would eliminate the need for a conditional use permit (CUP), typical conditions of approval added through the CUP process would be incorporated as Code requirements. This approach is consistent with prior amendments to the Zoning Code, where conditionally permitted uses were designated as permitted, and commonly applied conditions of approval were included in the Code. Staff believes that allowing these uses by right, while incorporating several operational standards into the Code, would serve the same purpose of requiring a conditional use permit by ensuring that such uses operate in a manner compatible with surrounding land uses. Code-required operational standards would include, but are not limited to, the following: • Alcoholic beverage manufacturing uses in any of the commercial zones may not exceed 6,000 square feet, unless otherwise permitted by conditional use permit. Businesses located in the Industrial zone would not be subject to a size limit. • Tasting rooms would be limited to 750 square feet. This limit is based on Fire and Building codes. Outdoor patios may be permitted and are limited to 1,000 square feet. Larger tasting rooms may be permitted through a conditional use permit, but would require significant building improvements at a substantial cost. Staff believes these sizes ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-00109 July 1, 2013 Page 3 of 4 are adequate to meet the needs of most craft breweries as these figures are greater than the size of existing tasting rooms in Anaheim. • Only beverages produced on the property may be served in the tasting room. • A security plan will be required to be approved by the Police Department prior to operation. Eliminating the need for a CUP, while incorporating typical conditions of approval into the Code, would create an incentive for additional microbreweries to locate in Anaheim. Eliminating the public hearing process associated with a conditional use permit application would save significant amounts of time and processing costs for prospective microbrewers. More importantly, the proposed approach creates certainty for the businesses. Per the provisions of the proposed ordinance, any of the operating standards that are incorporated into the Code could be modified through a conditional use permit (CUP) as long as they complied with infrastructure and life/safety requirements such as required exits from buildings, fire sprinklering of buildings and the use of certain building materials for construction. Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity: The State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) requires that a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) be made for businesses that sell alcohol for off-premises consumption when those uses are in areas that have a crime rate that is higher than the City average or where there is an overconcentration of off- sale licenses in the census tract where the business is proposed. Currently, the Planning Commission is the sole authority for making this determination. The proposed Code changes would provide the Planning Director with the authority to make this determination for Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing uses that would be permitted by right. The granting of such authority to the Planning Director is allowed under state law. In the event that any aspect of the use proposed requires consideration of a conditional use permit or a variance, then approval of the PCN determination would revert back to the Planning Commission and would be considered concurrently with that request at a public hearing. Parking: Alcoholic beverage manufacturing would be subject to the same parking standards required for an industrial or manufacturing use. These standards require 1.55 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet of building area and take into consideration the low number of employees per square foot for the manufacturing use. The standard also includes provisions for accessory office uses. Parking for any associated tasting room or outdoor patio area would be based on the standard for bars and nightclubs, which is 17 spaces per 1,000 square feet. CONCLUSION: The proposed Code amendment would support the BrewCity initiative by permitting alcoholic beverage manufacturing land uses by right, thereby creating a streamlined way to allow these businesses. The operational standards that would be included as Code requirements are based on careful review of the operational characteristics of existing breweries and are designed to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of this Zoning Code Amendment. Prepared by, Submitted by, Scott Koehm Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-00113 February 10, 2014 Page 4 of 4 Attachments: 1. Executive Summary 2. Draft Ordinance “BREW CITY” ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2013-00113 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY New provisions and updates are proposed throughout the Zoning Code to permit breweries and other alcoholic beverage manufacturing, by right, in certain commercial zones and the industrial zone. The following is a summary of the major changes proposed in the ordinance. 1. A new land use and definition has been added (“Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing”). This land use will include manufacturing facilities for the production of beer, wine, brandy and distilled spirits or other similar alcoholic beverage, in accordance with a valid license issued by the State of California. It also includes a “Tasting Room.” 2. “Tasting Room” is defined as an area located within an Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing establishment which is accessory to the manufacturing use. Only beverages manufactured on the premises may be consumed or sold in the tasting room. Alcoholic beverages may be sold for consumption on or off the premises. A tasting room is, and at all times shall remain, an ancillary use to the alcoholic beverage manufacturing use. 3. Proposed changes to the Commercial and Industrial Uses sections to allow Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing by right. This use will be permitted in the General Commercial and Regional Commercial zones, but not allowed in the Neighborhood Commercial, Office Low or Office High zones. The Neighborhood Commercial Zone is intended to serve surrounding neighborhoods and to provide uses such as small markets, barber shops, banks and specialty shops. Staff does not believe that this zone is compatible with the alcoholic beverage manufacturing use. Similarly, the O-L and O-H zones are intended for office uses and not alcohol manufacturing. A maximum size of 6,000 square feet will be allowed for these uses in the commercial zones. This is to ensure that large scale manufacturing facilities are not located in commercial zones. This size may be increased through approval of a conditional use permit. There is no size limit for this use in the industrial zone. 4. A Supplemental Use Regulation section has been added to establish operational requirements for these uses. This will limit the size of the tasting room to 750 square feet with a maximum outdoor patio size of 1,000 square feet. It will also require the preparation of a sewer study to evaluate sewer capacities and possible mitigation for any identified deficiencies caused by the use. It also permits a grain silo with an attached sign to be located outdoors and requires ground-mounted equipment to be located indoors in commercial zones. 5. Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing uses will be parked at industrial requirements and the tasting room will be parked at bar/night club requirements. For comparison purposes, a 6,000 square foot brewery, including a 750 square foot tasting room, will require 21 parking spaces which is less than that required for an equivalently sized retail use. 6. Code change provides Planning Director authority to approve Public Convenience or Necessity (PCN) applications for Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing uses. For PCN applications that include an entitlement request which requires Planning Commission approval, the PCN will accompany the request to Planning Commission which would have authority over the PCN determination. ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ORDINANCE NO. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING SECTION 18.38.025 TO CHAPTER 18.38 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MANUFACTURING IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND MAKING CORRESPONDING AMENDMENTS TO VARIOUS SECTIONS OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE. WHEREAS, pursuant to the City’s police power, as granted broadly under Article XI, Section 7 of the California Constitution, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has the authority to enact and enforce ordinances and regulations for the public peace, morals and welfare of the City of Anaheim (the "City") and its residents; and WHEREAS, the City Council recognizes that the burgeoning of micro- and craft-beer breweries has created new business and employment opportunities within the City and is a growing industry within the City, as well as on a state and national level; and WHEREAS, the City Council also recognizes the growth opportunity of small manufacturers of wine and distilled spirits as a source of additional business and employment opportunities within the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council desires to enable "alcoholic beverage manufacturers” meeting certain criteria under the Anaheim Municipal Code to obtain permits in a more efficient and cost-effective way to manufacture or produce and sell or distribute beer, wine, brandy or distilled spirits both within and without the jurisdiction of the City; and WHEREAS, the City Council finds and determines that this ordinance is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), pursuant to Sections 15060(c)(2) and 15060(c)(3) of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (California Code of Regulations, Title 14, Chapter 3; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), because it will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect physical change in the environment and is not a project as defined in Section 15378 of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, the City Council determines that this ordinance is in accord with the public purposes and provisions of applicable State and local laws and requirements. NOW, THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 2 That Section 18.92.040 ("A" Words, Terms and Phrases) of Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following new definitions: “Alcoholic beverage” includes alcohol, spirits, liquor, wine, beer, brandy, and every liquid or solid containing alcohol, spirits, wine, or beer, and which contains one-half of 1 percent or more of alcohol by volume and which is fit for beverage purposes either alone or when diluted, mixed, or combined with other substances. “Alcoholic beverage manufacturing” means the manufacture or production within the City of Anaheim of beer, wine, brandy or distilled spirits by any person licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California and includes the sale or distribution of said products both within and without the jurisdiction of the City. "Alcoholic beverage manufacturer" means a beer manufacturer, a winegrower, a distilled spirits manufacturer, or a brandy manufacturer, licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California, or any officer, director, employee or agent of any such person. SECTION 2. That Section 18.92.050 ("B" Words, Terms and Phrases) of Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following new definitions: “Beer” means any alcoholic beverage obtained by the fermentation of any infusion or decoction of barley, malt, hops, or any other similar product, or any combination thereof in water, and includes ale, porter, brown, stout, lager beer, small beer, and strong beer, but does not include sake, known as Japanese rice wine. Beer aged in an empty wooden barrel previously used to contain wine or distilled spirits shall be defined exclusively as “beer” and shall not be considered a dilution or mixture of any other alcoholic beverage. “Beer manufacturer” means any person licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California that has facilities and equipment for the purposes of, and is engaged in, the commercial manufacture of beer. "Brandy manufacturer" means any person licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California that is engaged in the manufacture of brandy only and not in the manufacture of any other distilled spirits. SECTION 3. 3 That Section 18.92.070 ("D" Words, Terms and Phrases) of Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following new definitions: “Distilled spirits” means an alcoholic beverage obtained by the distillation of fermented agricultural products, and includes alcohol for beverage use, spirits of wine, whiskey, rum, brandy, and gin, including all dilutions and mixtures thereof. “Distilled spirits manufacturer” means any person licensed by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control of the State of California who produces distilled spirits from naturally fermented materials or in any other manner. SECTION 4. That Section 18.92.230 ("T" Words, Terms and Phrases) of Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following new definition: "Tasting Room” means a separate area on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises maintained and operated by and for an alcoholic beverage manufacturer, wherein alcoholic beverages may be sold and served by an employee or designated representative of the alcoholic beverage manufacturer to consumers of legal drinking age for consumption on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises. The alcoholic beverages served shall be limited to the products that are authorized to be sold by the alcoholic beverage manufacturer under its license issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. Alcoholic beverages manufactured elsewhere may not be sold in the tasting room or on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises. A tasting room is, and at all times shall remain, an ancillary use to the alcoholic beverage manufacturing use. SECTION 5. That Section 18.92.260 ("W" Words, Terms and Phrases) of Chapter 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following new definitions: “Wine” means the product obtained from normal alcoholic fermentation of the juice of sound ripe grapes or other agricultural products containing natural or added sugar or any such alcoholic beverage to which is added grape brandy, fruit brandy, or spirits of wine, which is distilled from the particular agricultural product or products of which the wine is made and other rectified wine products and by whatever name and which does not contain more than 15 percent added flavoring, coloring, and blending material and which contains not more than 24 percent of alcohol by volume, and includes vermouth and sake, known as Japanese rice wine. 4 “Winegrower” means any person licensed by the Department who has facilities and equipment for the conversion of grapes, berries, or other fruit into wine and is engaged in the production of wine within the City. SECTION 6. That Table 8-A (Primary Uses: Commercial Zones) of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) be, and the same is hereby, amended to read in full as follows: Table 8-A PRIMARY USES: COMMERCIAL ZONES P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required C- NC C-R C-G O-L O-H Special Provisions Non-Residential Classes of Uses Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing N P/C P/C N N Subject to Section 18.38.025. Buildings larger than 6,000 square feet are subject to a Conditional Use Permit. Alcoholic Beverage Sales– Off-Sale P/C P/C P/C P/C P/C Conditional use permit not required if use is in conjunction with Markets– Large. In O-L and O-H Zones, must be clearly accessory to and integrated with an office building Alcoholic Beverage Sales– On-Sale C C C C C SECTION 7. That Table 10-A (Primary Uses: Industrial Zone) of Section 18.10.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zone) be, and the same is hereby, amended to read in full as follows: 5 Table 10-A PRIMARY USES: INDUSTRIAL ZONE P=Permitted by Right C=Conditional Use Permit Required N=Prohibited T=Telecommunications Antenna Review Permit Required I Special Provisions Non-Residential Classes of Uses Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing P/C Subject to Section 18.38.025 Alcoholic Beverage Sales–Off-Sale C Alcoholic Beverage Sales–On-Sale C SECTION 8. That subsection .010 ("A" Use Classes) of Section 18.36.040 (Non-Residential Primary Use Classes) of Chapter 18.36 (Types of Uses) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following new definition: Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing. This use class consists of establishments that produce or manufacture alcoholic beverages of all types. Businesses under this use class may sell alcohol produced or manufactured on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises for On-Sale or Off-Sale consumption. Typical uses include breweries, distilleries and wineries. Tasting rooms may be included in conjunction with the manufacturing. SECTION 9. That the following use classes set forth in subsection .010 ("A" Use Classes) of Section 18.36.040 (Non-Residential Primary Use Classes) of Chapter 18.36 of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same are hereby, amended to read in full as follows: Alcoholic Beverage Sales-Off-Sale. This use class consists of establishments that sell alcoholic beverages of all types for consumption outside the building in which 6 they are sold. Typical uses include liquor or grocery stores, and convenience markets, selling alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption. Alcoholic Beverage Sales-On-Sale. This use class consists of establishments that sell alcoholic beverages of all types for consumption within the building in which they are sold or in an accessory outdoor dining area. Typical uses include bars, wine bars, brew pubs, and restaurants that serve alcoholic beverages. SECTION 10. That new Section 18.38.025 (Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing) be added to Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code to read in full as follows: 18.38.025 ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE MANUFACTURING. An alcoholic beverage manufacturer shall comply with the provisions of this section. .010 Alcoholic beverage manufacturing shall be permitted by right in the "C-R" Regional Commercial Zone, the "C-G" General Commercial Zone, and the "I" Industrial Zone provided that the alcoholic beverage manufacturer satisfies the following requirements: .0101 A sewer study, including an identification of appropriate measures to mitigate sewer deficiencies, shall be prepared by a registered professional civil engineer in the State of California and submitted for consideration by the City Engineer. .0102 The sewer study is subject to approval by the City Engineer. The alcoholic beverage manufacturer will be required to implement all mitigation measures recommended in the sewer study, including the construction of new sewer facilities. .0103 Prior and as a condition to the opening for business of an alcoholic beverage manufacturing use, the alcoholic beverage manufacturer shall implement all such mitigation measures to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. .020 Alcoholic beverage manufacturing uses in any of the commercial zones identified in this section may not exceed 6,000 square feet, unless otherwise permitted by conditional use permit. On the other hand, alcoholic beverage manufacturing uses located in the "I" Industrial Zone shall not be limited by square footage. .030 A tasting room may not exceed a total of 750 square feet, unless otherwise permitted by conditional use permit. The area permitted for a tasting room shall not include any outdoor patio area. A tasting room consists of the 7 floor area where alcoholic beverages are consumed, including any bar and seating areas but shall not consist of area within the alcoholic beverages manufacturing licensed premises devoted to restrooms serving the tasting room. An outdoor patio area may be permitted provided it is not located in any required parking space or access way. An outdoor patio area may not exceed 1,000 square feet. .040 A grain silo may be permitted to be located outside of the building serving as the alcoholic beverage manufacturing use. The grain silo may not be located in any required parking space or access way. One (1) sign may be permitted on the grain silo with a maximum size of nine (9) square feet. The silo sign is permitted in addition to any permitted wall signs or monument signs. .050 Outdoor utility equipment must be screened in accordance with the requirements in Section 18.38.160 (Mechanical and utility equipment – ground mounted). Outdoor ground-mounted utility equipment is not permitted in Commercial zones. .060 Outdoor storage is prohibited in any commercial zone described in this section. .070 No video, electronic or other amusement devices or games shall be permitted. .080 The real property upon which an alcoholic beverage manufacturing use is operated shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by the provision of regular landscape maintenance, removal of trash and debris, and removal of graffiti within forty eight (48) hours from the time of occurrence. .090 Any proposed roof-mounted equipment shall be completely screened from view. This screening information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for a building permit. .100 A security plan in a form satisfactory to the Anaheim Police Department shall be submitted to and approved by the Anaheim Police Department prior and as a condition to the issuance of a permit, which plan shall be formulated to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, to promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to surrounding uses and the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises. .110 Parking lots, driveways, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings making up an alcoholic beverage manufacturing use shall be provided with enough lighting to illuminate and make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the alcoholic beverage 8 manufacturer's licensed premises during the hours of darkness and shall provide a safe and secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles onsite. .120 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. .130 Signs shall be posted inside the business near the exit door stating: "No alcohol allowed past this point." .140 The number of persons shall not exceed the maximum occupancy load as determined by the Anaheim Fire Department. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the room. (Section 25.114(a) Uniform Fire Code) .150 There shall be no live entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises at any time without issuance of proper permits as required by the Anaheim Municipal Code. .160 The display of alcoholic beverages shall not be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. .170 Up to four (4) Special Event Permits are allowed for an alcoholic beverages manufacturing use subject to Section 18.38.240, except that Special Event Permits may be permitted for alcoholic beverage manufacturing uses in the "I" Industrial Zone and in the Industrial Area (Development Area 1), Industrial Area – Recycling Overly Area (Development Area 1A), Expanded Industrial Area (Development Area 2) and the La Palma Core Area (Development Area 3) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. SP94-1. .180 Food preparation is not allowed on the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises. .190 An alcoholic beverage manufacturer shall not serve brands of alcoholic beverages distributed by a competing alcoholic beverage manufacturer. The alcoholic beverages served shall be limited to the products that are authorized to be sold by the alcoholic beverage manufacturer under its license issued by the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control. .200 A licensed alcoholic beverage manufacturer may, at the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises of production, sell to consumers for consumption off the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's licensed premises alcoholic beverages that are produced and bottled by, or produced and packaged for, that manufacturer. A licensed alcoholic beverage manufacturer may also sell such alcoholic beverages to consumers for consumption in the alcoholic beverage manufacturer's tasting room. SECTION 11. 9 That Table 42-A (Non-residential parking requirements) of Section 18.42.040 (Non- residential parking requirements) of Chapter 18.42 (Parking and Loading) be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following use class: Table 42-A NON-RESIDENTIAL PARKING REQUIREMENTS Use Class Required Spaces Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing 1.55 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA, which may include a maximum of 10% office space, plus, if the percentage of office space exceeds 10% of the GFA, 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for the floor area in excess of 10%. Tasting Room and outside patios: 17 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA. SECTION 12. That Section 18.60.220 (Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity) of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to include the following new definitions: 18.60.220 DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY. The Planning Commission shall have the authority to make determinations of public convenience or necessity on behalf of the City pursuant to Section 23958.4 of the California Business and Professions Code relating to the sale of alcoholic beverages, including beer and wine, or the section that may be subsequently adopted to replace Section 23958.4. The Planning Director shall have the authority to make determinations of public convenience or necessity on behalf of the City for uses classified as “Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing”, unless such an application is made in conjunction with an application for a conditional use permit and/or variance under Section 18.38.025, which will require Planning Commission action. In such event, the application for a conditional use permit and/or variance (as the case may be) and a determination of public convenience or necessity shall be made to the Planning Commission to be processed in accordance with Chapter 18.60 (Procedures). The process for making and appealing a determination of public convenience or necessity shall be as set forth for conditional use permits in Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits), except that no findings shall be required. Said process may be modified or supplemented by Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code, or the section that may be subsequently adopted to replace Section 23958. 10 SECTION 13. SEVERABILITY. The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence, phrase, term or word of this ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the City Council that it would have adopted all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared invalid. If any section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase of this Ordinance is for any reason held to be invalid or unconstitutional, such decision shall not affect the validity of the remaining portions of this Ordinance. The City Council hereby declares that it would have passed this Ordinance, and each section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause and phrase thereof, irrespective of the fact that any one (or more) section, subdivision, paragraph, sentence, clause or phrase had been declared invalid or unconstitutional. SECTION 14. CERTIFICATION The City Clerk shall certify to the passage of this ordinance and shall cause the same to be printed once within fifteen (15) days after its adoption in the Anaheim Bulletin, a newspaper of general circulation, published and circulated in the City of Anaheim. SECTION 15. EFFECTIVE DATE This ordinance shall take effect and be in full force thirty (30) days from and after its final passage. THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim held on the ____ day of ______________, 2014, and thereafter passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the ____ day of ______________, 2014, by the following roll call vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: ABSTAIN: CITY OF ANAHEIM By: _________________________________ MAYOR OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: ______________________________________ 11 CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 99986-v4/TReynolds 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.