2002-043RESOLUTION NO. 2002R- 43
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM URGING PUBLIC
SUPPORT FOR PROPOSITION 42 ON THE
MARCH 5 PRIMARY ELECTION BALLOT
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help make our roads safer
and reduce traffic without higher taxes by requiring the gasoline
sales taxes we already pay be used to improve mass transit,
highways and local roads; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 is based on the principle that
taxes paid at the gas pump should be used for transportation
purposes; and
WHEREAS, traffic is paralyzing travel with Los Angeles
now ranked the number one most congested urban area in the
country, San Francisco/Oakland second, San Diego sixth and
Sacramento, San Jose and San Bernardino/Riverside following close
behind; and
WHEREAS, with our neglected transportation system
needing attention, California has the third worst deteriorated
roads in the nation and more than 6000 of our bridges and
overpasses are structurally deficient or no longer meet highway
safety or design standards; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will provide a stable and
ongoing source of transportation funding that will make it
possible to plan for our future transportation needs; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will guarantee funds to every
city and county to help fix potholes, repair dangerous road
conditions and improve the safety of children walking or biking
to school; and
WHEREAS, Proposition 42 will help speed up highway
safety and traffic relief projects, and expand and improve mass
transit systems; and
WHEREAS, all Proposition 42 projects will be subject to
an annual audit and standard accounting practices to ensure they
are delivered on time and on budget; and
WHEREAS, by speeding up transportation projects,
thousands of new construction and other jobs will be created, our
economy will be stimulated and every dollar invested in our
highways will result in almost six times that in economic
benefits.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the City Council is in favor of the
passage of Proposition 42 and urges the voters of the City to
support this important ballot measure.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this ?&tn day of February ,
2002.
MAY~R OF TH~AHEIM
ATTEST:
C~TY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
43705.1
ATTACHMENT A
Proposition 42
Orange County Funding Estimates*
Cities Share = 20%
City .... 2008109
ALISO VIEJO* 613,700.00
ANAHEIM 3,099,990.00
BREA 368,890.00
BUENA PARK 771,040.00
COSTA MESA 1,063,820.00
CYPRESS 489,280.00
DANA POINT 378,870.00
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 567,990.00
FULLERTON 1,279,850.00
GARDEN GROVE 1,579,980.00
HUNTINGTON BEACH 1,989,060.00
IRVINE 1,442,520.00
LAGUNA BEACH 309,520.00
LAGUNA HILLS 252,290.00
LAGUNA NIGUEL 599,810.00
LAGUNA WOODS 460,910.00
LA HABRA 567,130.00
LAKE FOREST 598,500.00
LA PALMA 165,020.00
LOS ALAMITOS 121,030.00
MISSION VIEJO 982,560.00
NEWPORT BEACH 754,680.00
ORANGE 1,291,260.00
PLACENTIA 500,730.00
RANCHO SANTA MARGARITA 648,310.00
SAN CLEMENTE 501',960.00
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 324,270.00
SANTA ANA 3,170,150.00
SEAL BEACH 273,540.00
STANTON 342,750.00
TUSTIN 681,720.00
VILLA PARK 67,680.00
WESTMINSTER 874,520.00
YORBA LINDA 629,790.00
Cities Sub-Total 27,763,130.0Q..
Counties Share = 20%
County 2008/09
County of Orange 17,556,900.00
County Sub-Total 17,556,900.00
* = Assumes $1.4B available statewide starting in Fiscal Year 2008/09, with slight growth (-2%)
over time. ACA 4 formulas applied to this amount.
Official Ballot Label for Proposition 42:
TRANSPORTATION CONGESTION IMPROVEMENT ACT.
ALLOCATION OF EXISTING MOTOR VEHICLE FUEL SALES AND
USE TAX REVENUES FOR TRANSPORTATION PURPOSES ONLY.
LEGISLATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT.
Requires, effective July 1, 2003, existing revenues resulting from state
sales and use taxes on the sale of motor vehicle fuel be used for
transportation purposes as provided by law until June 30, 2008. Requires,
effective July 1, 2008, existing revenues resulting from state sales and use
taxes be used for public transit and mass transportation; city and county
street and road repairs and improvements; and state highway improvements.
Imposes the requirement for a two-thirds of the Legislature to suspend or
modify the percentage allocation of the revenues. Fiscal Impact: Starting in
2008-09, about $1.4 billion in state gasoline sales tax revenues, increasing
annually thereafter, would continue to be used for state and local
transportation purposes.
Proposition 42 Text:
Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 4--A resolution to propose
to the people of the State of California an amendment to the
Constitution of the State, by adding Article XIXB thereto, relating
to transportation.
LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
ACA 4, Durra. Transportation funding: sales and use tax
revenues.
The Sales and Use Tax Law imposes a tax on the gross receipts from
the sale in this state of, or the storage, use, or other consumption
in this state of, tangible personal property. That law requires
revenues derived from those taxes to be deposited in the Retail Sales
Tax Fund. Existing law requires the balance of that fund remaining
after various specified allocations to be allocated to the General
Fund.
This measure would, for the 2003-04 fiscal year and each fiscal
year thereafter, require all moneys that are collected during the
fiscal year under the Sales and Use Tax Law, with respect to the sale
or use of motor vehicle fuel, and that are required to be
transferred to the General Fund pursuant to that law, to instead be
transferred to the Transpor[ation Investment Fund. This measure
would, for the 2003-04 tc 2007-08 fiscal years, inclusive, require
moneys in that fund to be allocated for transportation purposes as
provided in a specified statute. This measure would, for the 2008-0j
fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, require moneys in the
fund to be allocated only for transportation purposes specified by
this measure, and would specify the allowable percentage amount to be
allocated for each specified ~ransportation purpose.
This measure would allow the Legislature to suspend or modify
these requirements under certain circumstances, if the act so
providing is approved by 2/3 of ~he entire membership of each house
of the Legislature.
(A) Twenty percent of the moneys for the purposes set forth in
subparagraph (A) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b).
(B) Forty percent of the moneys for the purposes set forth in
subparagraph (B) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b).
(C) Twenty percent of the moneys for the purposes set forth in
subparagraph (C)of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b).
(D) Twenty percent of the moneys for the purpose set forth in
subparagraph (D) of paragraph (2) of subdivision (b).
(d) The transfer of revenues from the General Fund of the State to
the Transportation Investment Fund pursuant to subdivision (a) may
be suspended, in whole or in part, for a fiscal year if both of the
following conditions are met:
(1) The Governor has issued a proclamation that declares that the
transfer of revenues pursuant to subdivision (a) will result in a
significant negative fiscal impact on the range of functions of
government funded by the General Fund of-the State.
(2) The Legislature enacts by statute, pursuant to a bill passed
in each house of the Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the
journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring, a suspension for
that fiscal year of the transfer of revenues pursuant to subdivision
(a), provided that the bill does not contain any other unrelated
provision.
(e) The Legislature may enact a statute that modifies the
percentage shares set forth in subdivision (c) by a bill passed in
each house of the Legislature by rollcall vote entered in the
journal, two-thirds of the membership concurring, provided that the
bill does not contain any other unrelated provision and that the
moneys described in subdivision (a) are expended solely for the
purposes set forth in paragraph (2) of subdivision (b).
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, SHERYLL SCHROEDER, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 2002R-43 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of
the Anaheim City Council held on the 26th day of February, 2002, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES:
MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Tait, Kdng, McCracken, Daly
NOES:
MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAIN ED:
MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT:
MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CI'[:Y CLERt~'OF ThE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)