1990/07/10City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES July 10, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER:
CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY CLERK:
DIRECTOR OF MAINTENANCE:
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR:
PLANNING DIVISION MANAGER:
ASSISTANT PLANNER:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler, Hunter
James Ruth
Jack White
Leonora N. Sohl
John Roche
Annika Santalahti
Mary McCloskey
Jonathan Borrego
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 4:30 p.m. on July 6, 1990 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all
items as shown herein.
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 4:00 p.m.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Jack White requested a Closed
Session to consider the following items:
a. To confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit:
Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 40-92-46; Anaheim Stadium Associates vs. City of
Anaheim, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 44-81-74.
b. To meet with and give directions to its authorized representative
regarding labor relations matters Government Code Section 54957.6.
c. To consider and take possible action upon personnel matters
pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
d. To meet with its Negotiator regarding the possible lease or sale
of land located at 1566 South Douglass Road, Anaheim California, to
Ogden Financial Services Inc. or other entity for a multipurpose
sports and entertainment arena.
e. To confer with its attorney regarding potential litigation
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1).
f. To consider and take possible action upon such other matters as
are orally announced by the City Attorney, City Manager or City
Council prior to such recess unless the motion to recess indicates
any of the matters will not be considered in closed session.
AFTER RECESS; Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present, and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. (6:03
p.m.)
691
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
INVOCATION; A Moment of Silence was observed in lieu of the invocation.
FLAG SALUTE; Mayor Pro Tem Irv Pickler led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: PRESENTATION - GRANT AWARD; Mr. G. Albert Howenstein, Executive
Director of the Office of Criminal Justice Planning presented a $112,500 Award
of Grant to the City. Mayor Hunter asked Chief of Police Joseph Molloy and
his staff to come forward to accept the Grant Award since they were
responsible for the Grant being awarded to the City of Anaheim. The Mayor and
Council Members thanked all those involved.
119; PRESENTATION OF CERTIFICATES TO HOMELESS SHELTER VOLUNTEER WORKERS;
Lynn Smith, Director, Anaheim Senior Citizen Center, introduced all of the
City employees who volunteered as Homeless Shelter Managers during the winter
of 1989/90. "Their unselfish efforts made the Winter Homeless Shelter
possible." The following people were presented with certificates and each
were thanked by Mayor Hunter and the Council: Sandy Apel, Pam Broberg, Minnie
Crane, Carol Erickson, Debbie Fank, Roz Franks, Richard Garcia, Randy Gaston,
Dave Hill, Chris Jarvi, Stan Kantor, Susan Leone, Sanjuana Martinez, Joe
Mohammed, Kathy McCarthy, Garry McRae, Jack Parra, Connie Phillips, Mike
Reynolds, Dennis Schmtdt, Ken Stone, Louis Vecchione, Susan Wynsen.
119; PROCLAMATION; The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Hunter and
authorized by the City Council:
International Cat Show Week in Anaheim
The International Cat Show Week in Anaheim Proclamation was accepted by Karen
Hauge.
119; DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION; A Declaration of Recognition was
unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to Paul E. Mulcahy,
Custodian, Facility Maintenance upon his retirement from the City after almost
22 years of service. Mr. Mulcahy was accompanied by his wife.
MINUTES; Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held June 12, 1990. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $2,698,931.97 for the week
ending June 29, 1990 and $3,848,297.06 for the week ending July 6, 1990, in
accordance with the 1989-90 and 1990-91 budgets, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Pickler,
seconded by Councilman Hunter, the following items were approved in accordance
with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council
Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar. Councilman Pickler offered
Resolution Nos. 90R-230 through 90R-239, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer
to Resolution Book.
692
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
Al. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken
as recommended.
a. Claim submitted by Carlota Franco for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about March 5, 1990 through March
8, 1990.
b. Claim submitted by Charles or Molly Bollenberg for property
damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 24,
1990.
c. Claim submitted by Kathy M. Stephens for property damage
sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 6, 1990.
d. Claim submitted by Mansour Roshan for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about December 20, 1989.
e. Claim submitted by Teresa A. Boulanger for property damage
sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 4, 1990.
f. Claim submitted by Lance Jay Walker for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 18, 1990.
g. Claim submitted by Marion Esposito for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about December 8, 1989.
h. Claim submitted by Christopher R. Cinco for property damage
sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 1, 1990.
i. Claim submitted by State Farm Insurance (Brenda Waulters,
Insured), for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City
on or about December 31, 1989.
j. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by
Karolina Molnar for bodily injury sustained purportedly due to actions of the
City on or about May 23, 1989.
A2. 105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Community Redevelopment
Commission meeting held June 13, 1990.
105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting held
June 7, 1990.
105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Anaheim Public Library Board meeting
held May 23, 1990.
140: Receiving and filing the Anaheim Public Library Monthly Statistical
Report for the month of May 1990.
173: Receiving and filingApplicatton of Supershuttle of Los Angeles, Inc.
before the Public Utilities Commission to provide scheduled service between
the Los Angeles International Airport, Long Beach Airport, John Wayne Airport,
Ontario International Airport and Burbank Airport, and scheduled points in the
Greater Los Angeles, Santa Monica and Anaheim areas.
693
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30
A3. 106/156: Amending fiscal year 1990/91 R.A.P. to increase expenditure
account 04-190-4101 by $28,621 and account 04-190-4199 by $19,176 to provide
funding for a Police Service Representative position with narcotic forfeiture
fund monies.
A4, 176: RESOLUTION NO, 90R-230; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS,
HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS. (Suggested date for public hearing August 28,
1990.)
A5, 176; RESOLUTION NO. 90R-231: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS,
HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS. (Suggested date for public hearing August 28,
1990.)
A6. 123: Approving the request for consent to assign agreement for City of
Anaheim crossing pipeline right-of-way at Sunkist Street from San Diego
Pipeline Company to Southern Pacific Pipe Lines Partnership L.P.
A7. 168/152: Authorizing staff to negotiate with the City of Garden Grove to
rename Haster Street to Anaheim Boulevard, and with the City of Orange to
rename the existing Anaheim Boulevard that parallels the I-5 Freeway.
A8, 176: RESOLUTION NO. 90R-232: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS,
HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS. (Suggested date for Public Hearing - August
28, 1990.)
A9. 123: Approving a replacement agreement with Jay's Catering for provision
of exclusive catering services for specified dates between July 1 and December
31, 1990 at the Brookhurst Community Center.
Al0. 175.123: Approving a contract with Southern California Gas Company to
install a gas line extension for the City's combustion turbine peaking plant,
and authorizing the Public Utilities General Manager to execute the contract.
All, 144/132; RESOLUTION NO, 90R-233; RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO
SUPPORT DESIGNATION OF THE COUNTY HEALTH CARE AGENCY AS THE ORANGE COUNTY
LOCAL ENFORCEMENT AGENCY AS REQUIRED BY THE Z'BERG-KAPILOFF SOLID WASTE
CONTROL ACT OF 197~.
Al2. 123: Approving the Assignment and Assumption Agreement, effective July
1, 1990, to transfer the City's Agreement for provision of insurance brokerage
services dated June 30, 1987, from Sedgwick James of California to Robert F.
Driver Company, Inc.
Al3. 180: Accepting the excess liability insurance coverage quote from
Associated Electric & Cas Insurance Services (AEGIS) in the amount of $298,622
for coverage in excess of $1,000,000 per occurrence self-insured retention to
cover the Public Utilities Department operations for the period of July 1,
1990 to July 1, 1991.
694
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
Al4. 123: Approving the Sixth Amendment to Agreement with Ball-Taft Medical
Clinic to provide professional services in the form of pre-employment medical
examinations, modifying present contract to include pre-employment
drug/alcohol screening of candidates for specific police and fire job
classifications.
Al5. 123: Approving the Second Amendment to the Agreement with the Anaheim
Visitor & Convention Bureau, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to
execute the agreement. Said Second Amendment provides for an annual sum equal
to actual out-of-pocket expenses incurred by the V & C Bureau, but not to
exceed 12% of the estimated transient occupancy tax receipts as budgeted for
the current fiscal year. (11.1% commencing July 1, 1991 and thereafter.)
Al6, 153; RESOLUTION NO. 90R-234: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, GENERAL UNIT.
153; RESOLUTION NO. 90R-235; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, GENERAL UNIT.
153: RESOLUTION NO. 90R-236; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, GENERAL UNIT.
Al7, 153; RESOLUTION NO, 90R-237; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE GITY OF
ANAHEIMAND THE ANAHEIM POLICE ASSOCIATION.
Al8, 160/128/152; ACCEPTANCE OF BID TO PURCHASE A CITY-WIDE TELEPHONE
SYSTEM; Accepting the Iow bid of Contel Corporation in an amount not to
exceed $1,514,901 for a city-wide telephone system to be installed replacing
the existing system, in accordance with bid proposal No. 4836. Submitted was
report dated June 18, 1990 from Diane Hughart, Purchasing Agent, recommending
acceptance of the Iow bid of Contel, authorizing the Finance Director to
negotiate an agreement and amending the Resource Allocation Plan accordingly.
City Manager James Ruth announced that a representative from PacTel Meridian
has asked to speak to the matter.
Jim Vanus, Regional Vice President, PacTel. He is present to protest the
announced low bid. PacTel is compliant under several iterations within the
request itself, for a complete new system in four locations and the second for
three upgrade systems with one new system coupled with that. PacTel was low
bid for the upgrade portion which they bid at $957,000 for a difference
between the two system bids between their low bid for upgrades and the
announced new system winner of $557,901.00. The difference between the new
system is the telephone sets and associated peripheral equipment in the line
card area. The system upgrade with additional tel sets added and associated
equipment will accomplish the goals that the Purchasing Department and the
695
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
consultant had put in the bid specification. Ail bids were substantially
under the budget. Even though all the bids were under specification, if an
alternate that could meet the City's requirements were available, it would be
unnecessary and needless to spend additional dollars.
PacTel is a long time "resident" in the business and 50 to 60% of their
business is involved in the upgrade of this particular type of equipment. It
meets the specification and he believes that a third option should be
considered - an upgrade with all the substance to accomplish the actual
switching equipment with related telephone sets. Several hundreds of
thousands of dollars are in the balance between an upgrade with associated
equipment that provides all the software features and capability including
voice messaging, the lighting of lights, etc. on the telephone set that was
identified in the new system requirement but not specifically asked for in
connection with the upgrade portion. He is asking the Council's consideration
to reopen the investigation on the new system, the phone systems, and to look
at other viable alternatives that will provide the best value for Anaheim.
City Manager Ruth. Staff has had an opportunity to meet with the PacTel
people and Mr. Roche can speak to the issue. The City's consultant is also
present and the Purchasing Agent.
John Roche, Director of Maintenance. When they went to a new specification
for a new phone system, it was bid with three options - (1) upgrade, (2) a
total new system and, (3) the centrex system. In the competitive bid process,
they received bids from a number of vendors. The consultant evaluated the
bids and based on the evaluation staff is recommending to the Council to go
with the new system for a number of reasons. PacTel mentioned one. The new
bid option includes all new phone instruments. In that way, they will not be
mixing ten year old instruments with new phone instruments. The other reasons
relate to cutover problems - cutting over a new system when having to change
out existing equipment. Instead of new equipment coming in being placed next
to the old, there will be a smoother cutover especially at the Civic Center.
Further, 80% of the telephone users still utilize ten year old instruments.
They would be mixing and intermixing ten year old equipment with new equipment
and hardware. Staff feels the new system is best for the City. It was a
competitive bid and staff feels it is making the right recommendation to the
Council.
At the end of the Consent Calendar, the City Council approved the ~taff
recommendation.
160/128/152: Authorizing the Finance Director to negotiate an agreement to
finance this equipment at the lowest competitive lease/purchase rate~
106: Amending the 1990/91 Resource Allocation Plan by increasing expenditure
account No. 75-255-6755 by $380,000.
Al9. 160: Accepting the bid of Simon West Coast, in the amount of
$262,525.68 for three 40' single bucket telescopic boom with conventional
cab-chassis and body, in accordance with bid proposal No. 4854.
696
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
A20. 160/128/152: Accepting the bid of Motorola Communications and
Electronics, Inc. in the amount of $187,441.66, including sales tax,
installation and maintenance for five years, for radio communication equipment
and associated components for the Convention Center, in accordance with bid
No. 4837.
Authorizing the Finance Director to negotiate an agreement to finance the
radio communication equipment at the lowest competitive lease/purchase rate.
A21, 175,123 (UTILITIES AGREEMENT): Authorizing the execution of an
agreement with Environmental Dynamics, for a period of one year from date of
execution to provide all services necessary for emergency response to
hazardous substance spills, in accordance with bid proposal No. 4794.
A22. 160: Accepting the bid of Petroleum Dynamics Inc. in the amount of
$38,779 for one automated fuel card management system, in accordance with bid
proposal No. 4860.
A23. 160: Accepting the bid of Simon West Coast in the amount of $285,878.38
for two 51' digger derrick trucks, in accordance with bid proposal No. 4853.
A24. 153/116: Approving the appointment of James L. Armstrong to the
position of Assistant City Manager, effective July 23, 1990, and approving
reimbursement not to exceed $7,500 in relocation expenses, with beginning
balances of 100 hours of sick leave, 80 hours of vacation, and vacation
accrual beginning at 5 hours per pay period, increasing to 6 hours on
completion of two years employment.
A25. 152/159/169: Adopting policies and guidelines submitted by Public
Works/Engineering Department regulating the installation of speed humps on
public streets.
106/169: Approving $22,000 from the Council contingency fund for installation
of speed humps for Glenview Avenue/Holbrook Street.
A26. 165: Awarding the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder,
Nobest, Inc., in the amount of $28,063.75 for Lincoln Avenue Sidewalk
Improvements.
A27. 175: Awarding the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder,
Wick Engineering, Inc., ~n t~e amount o~ ~1&~,551.00 £or ~estr~dge Pump
Station Modification.
A28. 123: Approving and authorizing the Director of Public Works to execute
State Service Agreement No. 12LA029 for the Western Avenue Street and Storm
Drain Federal Aid Urban (FAU) project from north City limits to the south City
limits.
A29. 169: Rejecting all bids received for the Lincoln Avenue Street and
Traffic Signal Improvements.
697
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
A30. 170/123: Approving the Final Map, Tract No. 12690-Revision 1, and
Subdivision Agreement, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
same. This tract contains 30.32 acres divided into 79 residential lots and 4
private street lots in the S.P. 87-1 Zone, in the Highlands at Anaheim Hills
Development Area 1.
A31, 129/142/152: ORDINANCE NO. 5145 CADOPTION): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION 16.08.100 OF CHAPTER 16.08 OF TITLE 16 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO UNDERGROUND STORAGE OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS.
A32. 123: Approving assignment of the City's rights under Bond No. 3SM 574
30500 - American Motorists Insurance Company to the Prado Ridge Estates
Homeowners'Association, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute
the assignment.
A33. 123: Approving an agreement with Orange County Health Services Agency
to provide animal control and animal shelter services, from July 1, 1990
through June 30, 1991.
A34. 123: Waiving Council Policy No. 401, and approving a contract with
Robert Bein, William Frost and Associates to provide design engineering
services for the Anaheim Arena. (Councilman Pickler voted No.)
A35. 123: Authorizing the City Manager to sign the Implementation Agreement
with the County of Orange concerning the National Pollution Discharge
Elimination System (NPDES) Requirements.
A36. 123: Approving and authorizing the Mayor to sign the escrow deposits in
lieu of retention agreement with Intersection Maintenance Service, in
connection with contract for construction of traffic signal improvements at
various locations.
A37. 161.123: Approving the Second Amendment to the Declaration of Covenants
and Restrictions (CC&Rs) applying certain use restrictions to property
recently acquired by the City approximate to the area of Ball Road and the 57
Freeway. (Sanderson J. Ray and Tozer properties)
A38. 175; RESOLUTION NO, 9OR-238: RESOLUTION OF THE CI~"f COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA AUTHORIZING THE INVITATION OF PROPOSALS FOR THE
PURCHASE OF $9,000,000 WATER REVENUE BONDS, 1990 SERIES, OF SAID CITY;
APPROVING THE FORM OF THE OFFICIAL BID FORM, THE NOTICE INVITING BIDS, THE
NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL BONDS AND THE PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMEN"r; AND
AUTHORIZING THE PUBLICATION OF THE NOTICE OF INTENTION TO SELL BONDS AND THE
NOTICE INVITING BIDS.
A39. 123; RESOLUTION NO, 90R-239; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE JOB TRAINING P~RTNERSHIP ACT }{ASTER SUBGR~JqT
AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE STATE OF CALIFOR/qIA.
A40. 177.174: Approving submission of the 1990 Comprehensive Homeless
Assistance Plan to the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development.
698
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS/ORDINANCE: The titles of the following
resolutions and ordinance were read by the City Manager. (Resolution Nos.
90R-230 through 90R-239, both inclusive, for adoption, and Ordinance No. 5145,
for adoption
Councilman Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions and
ordinance. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler offered Resolution Nos. 90R-230 through 90R-239, both
inclusive, for adoption, and Ordinance No. 5145 for adoption.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 90R-230 through 90R-239, both inclusive,
and Ordinance No. 5145 duly passed and adopted.
Motions carried.
End of Consent Calendar.
134/179; PUBLIC HEARING - MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, GENERAL PLAN
AMENDMENT NO, 301, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 89-90-52, WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT,
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3259, VARIANCE NO, 4056, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO.
14259:
OWNERS: Paul T. Salata
3100 Airway Avenue, Suite 124
Costa Mesa, California 92626
CALTRANS
District 12
Attention: Ralph Neal
2501 Pullman Street
Santa Aha, California 92705
AGENT'
Camille Courtney
711 East Imperial Highway, Suite 200
Brea, California 92621
LOCATION/REQUEST: 4000 East Riverdale. Property is approximately 10.5 acres
located on the north side of Riverside Freeway and south side of Addington
Drive.
The request is for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
proposing a redesignation of subject property from the existing Hillside
Low-Medium Density Residential designation to the Hillside Medium Density
Residential designation. RS-A-43,000 to RM-2400 (Portion A) or a less intense
699
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
zone and RS-5000 to RM-2400 (Portion B) or a less intense zone to permit a
152-unit condominium complex with waivers of maximum fence height, maximum
structural height and minimum rear yard setback.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION; General Plan Amendment No. 301
APPROVED (PC90-114). (3 yes votes, 2 no votes, 2 absent).
Reclassification No. 89-90-52 GRANTED to RM-3000 (PC90-115) (3 yes votes, 2 no
votes, 2 absent).
Conditional Use Permit No. 3259 WITHDRAWN.
Variance No. 4056 GRANTED (PC90-116) (3 yes votes, 2 no votes, 2 absent).
Tentative Tract Map No. 14259 APPROVED (3 yes votes, 2 no votes, 2 absent).
Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration with Amended Mitigation Monitoring
Program (4 yes votes, 1 no vote, 2 absent).
HEARING SET ON: This item was set for public hearing due to General Plan
Amendment No. 301.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 14, 1990
Posting of property June 15, 1990
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet June 13, 1990
PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See staff report to the Planning Commission dated
May 21, 1990.
The public hearing on this item was held and subsequently closed on June 26,
1990. Extensive testimony and input was received (see minutes that date).
The matter was automatically continued to this date for full Council action
and a decision only due to an insufficient number of votes to pass the
necessary resolutions at the meeting of June 26, 1990. (3 votes are necessary
to adopt a resolution - there were two votes to deny, one to approve, one
abstention and one absent.)
Councilman Pickler. He has reviewed the tape of the entire public hearing
held June 26, 1990 on this item. He has visited the site and talked to
different people as well as the developer. He has concerns relative to
ingress and egress, density and circulation. He is under the impression that
the developer feels more work is needed. Councilman Daly had recommended that
the project be sent back to the Planning Commission.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler thereupon moved that the project be referred back
to the Planning Commission and that the Planning Commission hold a public
hearing again and that the developer pay for any readvertising that may be
necessary as offered in letter dated July 9, 1990. Councilman Daly seconded
the motion.
Before further action was taken, Mayor Hunter stated it would be better to
deny the project and have the project go through the Planning process as a
clean project vs. having the Council refer it back to the Planning
700
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
Commission. He feels it will be back to the Council in a month or two. It
should be presented to the Planning Commission as a clean new project and
eventually if it comes back to the Council, it will be a new project rather
than trying to tinker with something that will have a difficult time.
City Attorney White. If the motion carries to refer the project
back to the Planning Commission, it will be necessary to
continue this hearing to a date certain at which time it would
automatically come back to the Council with a new recommendation
from the Planning Commission. Jurisdiction currently lies with
the City Council. Unless the Council acts upon the project
tonight, the only reference back to the Planning Commission
would be for a recommendation prefatory to the Council taking an
action as a result of the hearing already held in front of the
Council. The options are to approve or deny the project. If
denied and the applicant re-applied, it would start all over
with a new hearing at the Planning Commission. If referred to
the Planning Commission for further study and recommendation, it
would be in order for the Council to continue this hearing for a
given period at which time that recommendation would come back
to the Council automatically.
Councilman Ehrle. He agrees with the Mayor's recommendation.
He voted against the project previously and will do so again
tonight. He feels it is best for the developer to start over
without any time constraints. He has met with the neighbors and
it is felt that something will be built on the property, perhaps
some mixed use - condominiums and single family. The best way
is to start fresh so that the public can have input from the
beginning.
Councilman Daly. He would be inclined to agree were it not for
the fact that the Planning Commission approved the project. If
they had not, he would agree with starting over; Councilman
Ehrle emphasized, however, that it was a 3-2 vote at the
Planning Commission level.
City Attorney White then explained for Councilman Pickler that
whether or not the matter is referred back to the Planning
Commission or the Council denies the project and the applicant
starts all over, that the public can give input at the Planning
Commission hearing. If denied, the applicant would have to file
a new application and notice would have to be sent to the public
again. As a result of the hearing in front of the Planning
Commission, unless there was an appeal, it would not come back
to the Council automatically except for action upon the General
Plan Amendment which has to be approved by the Council. If the
Council refers the matter back it will of necessity have to come
back to the Council for a decision. The Council cannot be
divested of jurisdiction and give the matter back to the
701
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
Commission totally. There is not much difference other than it
tends to get confusing for the public and the record. One of
the issues may become that this project will involve different
types of variances which will require a re-notice. It will
necessitate tracking the existing application along with new
variances subsequently filed: however, it is not necessarily an
impediment. The Council has the option to do it either way.
Further Council discussion followed on the issue on whether to refer the
matter back to the Planning Commission or to take other action. Also, Annika
Santalahti, Zoning Administrator explained for Councilwoman Kaywood that the
zoning is low-medium density at present and with proper subdivision and
variances would not have to have a General Plan Amendment if the density is
held down. The current zoning is RS-A-43,000 but the General Plan is
low-medium.
At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Pickler stated he feels the
easiest way to proceed is to go along with the denial and in that way the
project will start from scratch.
Councilman Pickler thereupon withdrew his motion and Councilman Daly his
second.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION; On motion by
Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Council does
hereby approve a Mitigated Negative Declaration on the subject project and
accompanying Mitigation Monitoring Program as outlined in attachment "A" of
Planning Commission Resolution No. PC90-114 pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the
Public Resources Code on the basis that the Planning Commission/City Council
has considered the proposal with the mitigated Negative Declaration and
accompanying Monitoring Program, together with any comments received during
the public review process and further finding on the basis of the Initial
Study that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS: The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 90R-240 through 90R-242, both
inclusive)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution Nos. 90R-240 through 90R-242, both
inclusive, for adoption denying General PLan Amendment No. 301, denying
Reclassification No. 89-90-52 and denying Variance No. 4056. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-240: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT
NO. 301.
702
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10. 1990, 5;30 P,M,
RESOLUTION NO. 90R-241: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN
A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-242: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 4056.
Roll Gall Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 90R-240 through 90R-242, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
MOTION: Councilman Hunter moved to deny Tentative Tract Map No. 14259.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: By general consent the Council recessed for ten minutes. (6:53 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (7:00 p.m.)
179; PUBLIC HEARING - WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT, VARIANCE NO, 4049,
CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 11;
OWNER: Narottamabhai Patel, et al
1536 North Western Avenue
Hollywood, California 90027
AGENT:
Quiel Brothers Signs
272 South I Street
San Bernardino, California
92410
LOCATION/REQUEST: 1914 South Anaheim Boulevard. Property is approximately
1.6 acres located on the northeast side of Anaheim Boulevard and approximately
450 feet northwest of the centerline of Pacifico Avenue.
The request is for waivers of maximum number of freestandin§ signs, permitted
location of freestanding signs and maxtmu~ sign area within parking area to
construct two freestanding signs.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Variance No. 4049 GRANTED (PCg0-111) applicant to stipulate to an 8' x 20'
freestanding sign with no changeable copy, and allow a small monument sign
with changeable copy (5 yes votes, 2 no votes).
HEARING SET ON: A review of the Planning Commission decision was requested by
Councilman Daly and Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of May 22, 1990 and
703
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
public hearing held on June 26, 1990. The matter was then automatically
continued to this date for full Council action and a decision only due to a
tie vote on June 26, 1990 (see minutes that date where testimony and input was
received).
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator. This is a sign
variance for two separate signs a tall freestanding sign and a
low monument sign. Three waivers are requested as indicated -
the second and third pertain only to the large freestanding
sign. If the Council approves the request in part, it can be
done because the waivers relate to different signs. The pole
sign is 45 feet tall and 300 square feet in area. If the big
freestanding sign is approved, it would be approved in part
denying waiver A allowing only that sign, or the whole thing is
approved for the monument sign and the freestanding sign, or all
denied. The pole sign is in the front setback along Anaheim
Boulevard which normally would allow only a 100 square foot sign.
Councilman Daly. He referred to page 3, item 16 of the staff
report noting that staff indicated that the requested waivers
are considered to be inappropriate for and incompatible with the
emerging business center and recommends that the waivers be
denied. The City has such an aggressive effort under way to
improve the looks of the entire area, it is necessary to be very
careful relative to the signs that are approved. It is
beneficial that the property is undergoing such a nice
improvement but there is no reason to approve signs they may
regret later on.
Miss Santalahti explained for Councilman Pickler that the 45
foot sign is too close to the north property line. It should be
48 feet away and it is 7 feet. The 45 feet is okay by Code.
The size at that location is a maximum 100 square feet and they
are asking for 318 square feet. If Council denies the request,
they would be allowed to have a sign generally at the center of
the property at 100 square feet. It could be 318 square feet if
located back 50 feet. There could not be a monument plus a
freestanding sign but there could be a pole sign since that
would be legitimate under Code.
Councilman Pickler. His concern when he listened and watched
the proceedings was the monument sign as well as the height of
signs that would be placed in that area. He can agree with the
pole sign but not a monument sign as well.
Mayor Hunter. If the monument sign is set back 50 feet, no one
could see it and it would be worthless.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator. She reiterated the
Council can approve the request in part. They could approve a
704
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P.M.
freestanding sign 7 feet from the north property line and limit
the height. If they allow a sign in an improper location, they
can limit the height and size. The applicant needs one or more
waivers. The monument sign by itself would be okay as located.
The Council could also deny the entire request.
Councilman Ehrle. This is a project which will enhance the area
and they should try to assist the applicant. There is also a
new sign ordinance which will be coming to the Council and in
that ordinance there will be standards relative to signs.
Mary McCloskey, Planning Division Manager. The ordinance will
apply only to the C-R area. Staff is considering initiating a
similar study in the Stadium Business Center. They are waiting
for the CR study to come together to look at aesthetic
considerations including signage in the Anaheim Stadium business
Center also. This would be included in that but not subject to
the sign regulations the Council is going to be considering next
week on the CR area.
Councilman Pickler. It should not be limited just to the
Stadium and CR area but throughout the City.
Anntka Santalahti then explained for the Mayor that the item was
appealed by the petitioner. The Commission approved it in part
allowing a freestanding sign 8 by 20 feet having no changeable
copy. The 45 feet is acceptable at this location because of the
distance to the centerline of the street. The lowest
freestanding sign they normally see is around 25 feet - 45 feet
is fairly high. She is assuming they are talking about freeway
visibility. She clarified 25 feet is what they normally see
near residential areas.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION; On motion by Councilman
Daly, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Council ratified the
determination that the proposed activity falls within the definition of
Section 3.01 Class 11, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to the requirements
for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt
from the requirement to file an Environmental Impact Report. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 90R-226)
Councilman Daly moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Daly offered Resolution No. 90R-226 for adoption, granting Variance
No. 4049, subject to City Planning Commission conditions but that the
freestanding sign be no higher than 25 feet and no larger than 8 feet by 20
feet. Refer to Resolution Book.
705
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-226; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 4049, IN PART.
Before a vote was taken, Councilman Pickler questioned the
action on the monument sign; Miss Santalahtt stated it sounds
like it is being allowed. The monument sign is 16 square feet,
5 feet high. It is changeable to the extent of advertising room
rates. She believes that is the reason why there is an interest
in changeable copy.
Councilman Pickler. He will go along with the monument sign if
there is no changeable copy; Mayor Hunter noted that businesses
are advertising the room rate along with the name of the hotel.
Councilman Pickler. That is what most hotel and motel owners
want in the CR area. When they start a bidding war there is a
great deal of animosity and he feels they will be helping the
problem instead of alleviating it.
Councilman Daly thereupon incorporated into his resolution that there be no
changeable copy on the monument sign but that it be allowed.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolution as amended granting Variance
No. 4049 subject to City Planning Commission conditions, that the freestanding
sign be only 25 feet high with no changeable copy and with the same size limit
as imposed by the Planning Commission and that the monument sign be approved
but with no changeable copy.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS;
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 90R-226 duly passed and adopted.
176; PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NO, 89-16A; In accordance with application
filed by Thielmann Engineers for Hill Williams Development Company, 5500 East
Santa Ana Canyon Road, Suite 211, Anaheim 92807 public hearing was held to
consider abandoning a storm drain easement located generally east of Fairmont
Boulevard south of Santa Ana Canyon Road pursuant to Resolution No. 90R-182
duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in
accordance with law.
Report of the City Engineer dated May 23, 1990 was submitted recommending
approval of said abandonment.
Richard Santo, Senior Real Property Agent, stated that staff recommends
approval of the proposed abandonment.
706
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990. 5:30 P.M.
Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to address
the Council; there being no response he closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman
Hunter, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Council determined that the
proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01 Class 5 of the
City of Anaheim guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact
Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an
Environmental Impact Report. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION; The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 90R-243)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 90R-243 for adoption, approving
Abandonment No. 89-16A. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-243; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM VACATING A STORM DRAIN EASEMENT LOCATED EAST OF FAIRMONT BOULEVARD AND
SOUTH OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD. (89-16A)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 90R-243 duly passed and adopted.
134/179; PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 299-1 AND 2,
RECLASSIFICATION NO, 89-90-51 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
INITIATED BY: The City of Anaheim
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92805
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
redest§nattn~ subject areas from the Medium Density Residential designation to
the Low-Medium Density Residential desi~nation (Area 1) and to the Low Density
Residential designation (Area 2).
LOCATION - AREA 1: Approximately 24 acres consisting of those properties
fronting on the west side of Magnolia Avenue beginning approximately 325 feet
north of the centerllne of Lincoln Avenue and extending north approximately
1,650 feet.
LOCATION - AREA 2: Approximately 1.5 acres consisting of those properties
located on the south side of Yale Avenue beginning at the easterly terminus of
707
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
said street and extending west approximately 665 feet to the Southern
California Edison Easement.
A City-initiated reclassification from the RM-1200 (Residential,
Multiple-Family) Zone to the RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less
intense zone.
LOCATION: A rectangularly-shaped parcel of land consisting of approximately
9.27 acres, having a frontage of approximately 662 feet on the west side of
Magnolia Avenue, having a maximum depth of approximately 611 feet and being
located approximately 160 feet south of the centerltne of Baylor Circle and
further described as 425 North Magnolia Avenue.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION; General Plan Amendment No. 299-1 and
2 APPROVED (PC90-104) (7 yes votes).
Reclassification No. 89-90-51 GRANTED (PC90-105) (modified to RM-3000).
Approved Negative Declaration.
HEARING SET ON: This matter was set for a public hearing necessitated by the
General Plan Amendment.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 28, 1990
Posting of property June 29, 1990
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 27, 1990
PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See staff report to the Planning Commission dated
June 4, 1990.
City Clerk Lee Sohl announced that there is a recommendation from staff that
this public hearing be continued to August 14, 1990 to be considered in
conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 3275 scheduled for a public
hearing that date.
Mayor Hunter asked to hear from anyone opposed to a continuance of the matter;
there was no response.
MOTION; Councilman Pickler moved to continue the subject public hearing to
Tuesday, August 14, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. Councilman Daly seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
134; PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 304 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
INITIATED BY: CITY OF ANAHEIM
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92807
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
redestgnating subject area from the Medium Density Residential designation to
the Low-Medium Density Residential designation.
708
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
LOCATION: The property is located at 3238-3302 West Ball Road. Subject area
consists of those 2 parcels having a combined area of approximately 3.88
acres, on the south side of Ball Road approximately 495 feet west of the
centerline of Western Avenue.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
GRANTED (PC90-112) (7 yes votes).
Negative Declaration approved.
General Plan Amendment No. 304
HEARING SET ON: The matter was set for public hearing before the City Council
necessitated by the General Plan Amendment
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 28, 1990
Posting of property June 29, 1990
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 27, 1990
STAFF INPUT: See staff report to the Planing Commission dated May 7, 1990.
City Clerk Sohl announced that there is a recommendation from staff that this
public hearing be continued to August 14, 1990 to be considered in conjunction
with Reclassification No. 89-90-57 scheduled for public hearing that date.
Mayor Hunter asked to hear from anyone opposed to a continuance of the matter;
there was no response.
MOTION; Councilman Pickler moved to continue the subject public hearing to
Tuesday, August 14, 1990 at 6:00 p.m. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
134/179; PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 305, RECLASSIFICATION
NO. 89-90-54 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION;
INITIATED BY: CITY OF ANAHEIM
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92805
IX)CATION: The property is located at 730-810 North Loara Street. The sub3ect
area consists of approximately 4.4 acres on the east side of Loara Street
approximately 585 feet north of the centerline of North Street.
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
redestgnating subject area from the Low Density Residential designation to the
Low-Medium Density Residential designation.
A City-initiated reclassification of subject area from the RM-1200 Zone to the
RM-2400 or a less intense zone.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION; General Plan Amendment No. 305,
Exhibit A, APPROVED (PC90-121), Reclassification No. 89-90-54, GRANTED
709
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
(PC90-122) (5 yes votes, 2 absent).
Negative Declaration approved.
HEARING SET ON: This matter was set for public hearing before the City
Council necessitated by the General Plan Amendment.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 28, 1990
Posting of property June 29, 1990
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 27, 1990
PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See staff report to the Planning Commission dated May
21, 1990.
Jonathan Borrego, Assistant Planner. Staff concurs with the
Planning Commission's approval of the request based on existing
land use which is a senior citizen's condominium project and
also the existing density of the property.
Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing and asked to hear from anyone who
wished to speak either in favor or in opposition.
Pat Randolph, 1274 West Catalpa. She is not sure she
understands whether the proposed amendment to the General Plan
is going to allow higher or lower density.
Jonathan Borrego. If approved, it would insure maintaining the
existing density and it would not permit an increased density.
He clarified that it would not change from a senior project. He
also explained as requested by Councilwoman Kaywood the
difference between a General Plan Amendment and a rezoning of
property.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION IN FAVOR: None
PUBLIC DISCUSSION IN OPPOSITION: None
COUNCIL ACTION; Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION; On motion by Councilman
Pickler, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the Gity Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING RESOLUTION; The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 90R-244 and 90R-245)
Councilman Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
710
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
Councilman Pickler offered Resolution No. 90R-244 for adoption, approving
General Plan Amendment No. 305, Exhibit A and Resolution No. 90R-245 for
adoption, approving Reclassification No. 89-90-54. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-244: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE ANAHEIM GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 305, EXHIBIT "A".
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-245; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF
CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 90R-244 and 90R-245 duly passed and adopted.
134/179; PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 306-1 and 306-2,
RECLASSIFICATION NO, 89-90-55 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
INITIATED BY: CITY OF ANAHEIM
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92805
General PLan Amendment No. 306-1 and 306-2: A City-initiated amendment to the
Land Use Element of the General Plan redestgnating subject area from the
Medium Density Residential designation to the Low Density Residential
designation (Area 1) and to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation
(Area 2).
Area 1: Approximately 9.6 acres consisting of the following areas:
Three parcels located on the west side of Valley Street, beginning
approximately 160 feet south of the centerline of Crone Avenue and extending
south to Minerva Street.
Those parcels located on the north and south sides of Minerva Avenue,
beginning at the alley at the western terminus of said street and extending
east approximately 1,250 feet.
Those parcels located on the west side of Agate Street, beginning
approximately 150 feet south of the centerline of Beacon Avenue and extending
south to Ball Road.
Area 2: Approximately 16 acres consisting of the following areas:
Those properties located on the north side of Juno Avenue and June Place,
beginning at the alley at the western terminus of Juno Avenue and extending
east to the easterly terminus of Juno Place.
That area located on the north side of Ball Road, having a frontage of
711
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
approximately 469 feet on the north side of Ball Road and extending north
approximately 1270 feet and being located approximately 195 feet east of the
centerline of Brookhurst Street.
Reclassification No. 89-90-55: A City-initiated reclassification of
properties from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple-Family Zone to the RM-2400
(Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION; General Plan Amendment No. 306-1,
306-2, APPROVED (PC90-123) - Exhibit A amended, deleting properties fronting
on Brookhurst (5 yes votes, 2 absent).
Reclassification No. 89-90-55, GRANTED (PC90-124) (5 yes votes, 2 absent).
Negative Declaration Approved.
HEARING SET ON: This matter was set for public hearing before the City
Council necessitated by the General Plan Amendment.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 28, 1990
Posting of property June 29, 1990
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 27, 1990
Planning Staff Input: See staff report to the Planning Commission dated May
21, 1990.
Jonathan Borrego, Assistant Planner. He briefed the Council on
the proposed General Plan Amendment as well as the recommended
zone change from RM-1200 to RM-2400. He also noted that when
the Planning Commission voted they did elect to amend the
original exhibit and that amended version is posted on the
Chamber wall marked Exhibit A - Amended. They excluded the
westernmost portion of study area 2 and also included church
property south of Juno Place which is actually located on Ball
Road. That is the next item for Council consideration on the
agenda. The Commission requested separate action on those items.
Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing and asked to hear from those who wished
to speak either in favor or in opposition.
Mr. Don Heiker, 939 South Agate. He was pre~ent at the public
hearings relative to the apartment complex that was ultimately
approved on Ball Road in the subject area. He is present today to
state that the residents are very much in favor of the proposed
downzoning of the property in question.
COUNCIL ACTION; Since there were no further persons who wished to speak
either in favor or in opposition Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION; On motion by Councilman
Hunter, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Council approved the negative
712
City Ha~, Anaheim, GalSfornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and that
there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment . MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS: The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 90R-246 and 90R-247)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 90R-246 for adoption, approving
General Plan Amendment No. 306-1 and 306-2 and Resolution No. 90R-247 for
adoption, approving Reclassification No. 89-90-55 as amended, subject to City
Planning Commission conditions. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 90R-246: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE ANAHEIM GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENTS NO. 306-1 AND 306-2, EXHIBIT "A (AMENDED)"
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-247; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF
CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 90R-246 and 90R-247 duly passed and adopted.
134; PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PIAN AMENDMENT NO, 310-1 AND 310-2 AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION;
INITIATED BY: CITY OF ANAHEIM
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92805
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
redesi~natin§ subject areas from the Medium Density Residential designation to
the General Commercial designation (Area 1) and to the I~w-Medium Density
Residential designation (Area 2).
LOCATION: Area 1: Approximately 0.73 acre beginning approximately 305 feet
north of the centerltne of Ball Road extending north approximately 570 feet
and being located approximately 190 feet east of the centerline of Brookhurst
Street.
713
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990, 5;30 P,M,
LOCATION: Area 2: Approximately 4.0 acres located at the northeast corner of
Ball Road and Empire Street having approximate frontages of 415 feet on the
north side of Ball Road and 295 feet on the east side of Empire Street and
further described as 2045 West Ball Road.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION;
310-2 APPROVED (PC90-149) (7 yes votes).
Negative Declaration approved.
General Plan Amendment No. 310-1 and
HEARING SET ON: This matter was set for public hearing before the City
Council necessitated by the General Plan Amendment.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 28, 1990
Posting of property June 29, 1990
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet 3une 27, 1990
PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See staff report to the Planning Commission dated June
18, 1990.
Jonathan Borrego, Assistant Planner. He briefed the Council on
the proposed General Plan Amendment noting also that this was a
result of the previous item on the agenda (GPA 306-1 and 306-2).
Mayor Hunter opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wished to speak.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION IN FAVOR: None
PUBLIC DISCUSSION IN OPPOSITION: None
COUNCIL ACTION; Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION; On motion by Councilman
Hunter, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council approved the
negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative
declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process, and that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have
a significant effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 90R-248)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilwoman ~aywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 90R-248 for adoption, approving
General Plan Amendment No. 310-1 and 310-2, EXHIBIT A. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-248; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENTS TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE ANAHEIM GENERAL
PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENTS NO. 310-1 AND 310-2, EXHIBIT "A".
714
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 90R-248 duly passed and adopted.
179; ITEMS B1 THROUGH B9 FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 18,
1990;
INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS JULY 10. 1990.
B1, 179;
NO, 4042;
CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 89-90-49, VARIANCE
OWNER: Schroeder-Grim Orange Associates, Attention: William Rice,
2411 East Coast Highway, #300, Corona Del Mar, California 92625
AGENT: Farano and Kieviet, 100 South Anaheim Boulevard, #340,
Anaheim, California 92805
LOCATION: 2518, 2520, 2532 and 2540 West Orange Avenue. Property is
approximately 2.03 acres located at the southeast corner of Orange
Avenue and Velare Street.
RS-A-43,000 to RM-3000 or a less intense zone.
To construct a 2-story, 18-unit RM-3000 residential condominium
complex with waivers of: a) minimum parking space dimensions
(denied), b) permitted residential structures, c) parking access
requirement (denied).
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Reclassification No. 89-90-49 GRANTED and Variance No. 4042 GRANTED
IN PART (PC90-147 and PC90-148) 6 yes, 1 no vote.
Approved Negative Declaration.
Changes were to eliminate the 4th bedroom from Plan B and to
stipulate in CC&Rs that garages are only to be used for parking, not
storage.
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Council
Members Kaywood and Hunter, and therefore, a public hearing will be scheduled
at a later date.
B2, 134;
310-2:
CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 310-1 AND
OWNER: Initiated by the City of Anaheim, 200 South Anaheim
Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92803.
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan redesignattng subject areas from the Medium Density Residential
designation to the General Commercial designation (Area 1) and to the
Low-Medium Density Residential designation (Area 2).
715
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
LOCATION: Area 1: Approximately 0.73 acre beginning approximately
305 feet north of the centerline of Ball Road extending north
approximately 570 feet and being located approximately 190 feet east
of the centerline of Brookhurst Street.
LOCATION: Area 2: Approximately 4.0 acres located at the northeast
corner of Ball Road and Empire Street having approximate frontages of
415 feet on the north side of Ball Road and 295 feet on the east side
of Empire Street and further described as 2045 West Ball Road.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: General Plan Amendment No.
310-1 and 310-2 recommended for General Commercial (Area 1) and
Low-Medium Density Residential (Area 2) (PC90-149, 7 yes votes)
Negative Declaration Approved.
General Plan Amendment No. 310-1 and 310-2 set for hearing before City Council
this date. See Item D8 this date.
B3, 134;
GEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 311;
OWNER: Initiated by the City of Anaheim, 200 South Anaheim
Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92803.
LOCATION: 2200-2220 South Della Lane: Those 4 parcels located on
the east side of Della Lane, having a combined area of approximately
1.06 acres and having a combined frontage of approximately 330 feet
on the east side of Della Lane.
A City-initiated amendment to the Land Use Element of the General
Plan redesignating subject areas from the Medium Density Residential
designation to the Low Density Residential designation.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION;
Recommended Low Density Residential designation (PC90-150, 7 yes
votes.)
Negative Declaration approved.
This item to be set for public hearing due to General Plan Amendment No. 311.
B4, 179; CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL
USE PERMIT NO, 3263;
OWNER: Shell Oil Company, Post Office Box 4848, Anaheim, California
92803.
AGENT: Service Station Services Inc., Attention: Angela T. Smith,
2122 South Grand Avenue, Suite E, Santa Ana, California 92705
LOCATION: 1200 North Euclid Street. Property is approximately 0.59
acre located at the northeast corner of Romneya Drive and Euclid
Street.
To permit a car wash facility in conjunction with an existing service
station with waivers of: a) maximum sign area (denied); b) permitted
location of freestanding sign; c) maximum number of freestanding
signs; d) minimum distance between freestanding signs.
716
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Conditional Use Permit No. 3263 GRANTED IN PART by the Planning
Commission (PC90-151) 4 yes votes and 3 no votes.
With amendments to condition regarding monument sign - to be located
outside the 25-foot line-of-sight triangle; and both driveways
nearest corner of Romneya and Euclid are closed; condition No. 20
deleted.
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by the applicant and,
therefore, a public hearing will be scheduled at a later date.
B5, 134/179; CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (READVERTISED), WAIVER OF CODE
REQUIREMENT, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO, 297 (READVERTISED), RECLASSIFICATION
NO, 89-90-50 (READVERTISED), CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3252 (READVERTISED):
OWNER: Jerome Marks Trust, Sherrie Robertt Marks Trust, 1080 Park
Newport, Newport Beach, California 92660
AGENT: Dividend Development Corporation , Attention: Jim Medall,
700 Yanacio Valley Road, #360, Walnut Creek, California 94596
LOCATION: 2144 West Lincoln Avenue. Property is approximately 6.47
acres located on the south side of Lincoln Avenue and approximately
102 feet west of the centerline of Empire Street.
Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan
proposing a redesignation of the northerly 1.14 acres of subject
property having frontage on Lincoln Avenue (Portion A), the
southwesterly 2.6 acres of subject property (Portion B), and the
southeasterly 2.62 acres of subject property (Portion C) from the
respective existing General Commercial Low Density Residential and
Low-Medium Density Residential General Plan Land Use designations to
the Medium Density Residential Land Use designation.
Portion A from PD-C to RM-1200, Portion B from CL to RM-1200 to
permit a 3-story, 226-unit deck-type housing apartment complex with
waiver of minimum landscape setback.
ACTION TAKEN BY PLANNING COMMISSION: General Plan Amendment No. 297,
Reclassification No. 89-90-50 and Conditional Use Permit No. 3252
DENIED (PC90-152, 153 and 154).
Negative Declaration denied 4 yes, 2 no.
General Plan Amendment No. 297 denied 5 yes, 1 no.
Reclassification No. 89-90-50 denied 5 yes, 1 no.
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by the applicant and,
therefore, a public hearing has been scheduled for August 14, 1990, 6:00 p.m.
B6, 179: GEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WAIVER CODE REQUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO, 3289;
OWNER: Anaheim Hills Enterprises, 5100 East La Palma, Suite 202,
Anaheim, California 92807
AGENT: Adat Ari Synagogue, 18032 Clemon, Yorba Linda, California
92686
717
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
LOCATION: 5100 East La Palma, Suites 104 and 105.
Property is approximately 6.3 acres on the south side of La Palma
Avenue and approximately 3,560 feet east of the centerline of
Lakeview Avenue.
To permit a synagogue with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
ACTION TAKEN BY PLANNING COMMISSION:
No. 3289 for a period of three years.
Approved Negative Declaration.
GRANTED Conditional Use Permit
(PC90-155) 5 yes, 2 absent.
179; CEQANEGATIVE DECLARATION (READVERTISED), VARIANCE NO, 3956
(READVERTISED);
OWNER: Westbay Development, 3860 East Eagle Drive, Anaheim,
California, 92807.
LOCATION: 1421 West Crone Avenue.
Property is approximately 25,093 square feet located on the north
side of Crone Avenue and approximately 243 feet west of the
centerline of Pythias Avenue.
Amendment to conditions of approval pertaining to allowing two-story
homes.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
(PC90-156 6 yes, 1 absent).
Approved Negative Declaration.
GRANTED Variance No. 3956.
Councilman Pickler posed questions for purposes of clarification which were
answered by the Zoning Administrator. He was concerned that the project does
not fit into the environment and wanted the matter set for public hearing.
No further action was taken by the Council since a second Council Member did
not concur that it should be set.
B8, 179; CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED), CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO, 2582 (READVERTISED)~
OWNER: Arco Products Oompany, 17315 Studebaker Road, Gerritos,
California 90801
LOCATION: 2401 West Lincoln AVenue.
Property is approximately 0.5 acre located at the northwe3st corner
of Lincoln Avenue and Gilbert Street.
Amendment to conditions of approval pertaining to a 6-foot high wall
for required site screening.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Recommended that the City
Council, at an advertised public hearing, amend conditions to delete
the requirement for a 6 foot high wall. (6 yes, 1 absent).
No action taken on Negative Declaration.
718
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
B9, 179; CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY APPROVED), CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO, 3059 (READVERTISED);
OWNER: Donald T. Takai, 3174 West Rome Avenue, Anaheim, California
92804
AGENT: Magdy Hanna, 4400 MacArthur Boulevard, 9th Floor, Newport
Beach, California 92660
LOCATION: 150 South Dale Avenue
Property is approximately 1.72 acres located on the east side of Dale
Avenue and approximately 650 feet south of the centerline of Lincoln
Avenue.
Amendment to conditions of approval pertaining to street improvements
for a previously approved 27-unit mobile home park.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: DENIED Conditional Use
Permit No. 3059 (PC90-157, 6 yes votes, 1 absent).
No action taken on Negative Declaration.
ITEMS Bi0 - B17 FROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MEETING OF JUNE 28, 1990 -
DECISION DATE: July 5. 1990.
INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS JULY 20, 1990.
Bi0, 179; CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 11. VARIANCE NO. 4047
(READVERTISED);
OWNER: John Stevens, 1570 West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, California
92802
LOCATION: 1570 West Katella
Property is approximately .26 acre located on the south side of
Katella Avenue approximately 225 feet east of the centerline of
Bayless Street.
To modify previously approved waiver of permitted wall signs to
retain 4 wall signs and construct 1 new wall sign
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved with modified
Condition (ZA90-35).
Councilwoman Kaywood posed questions to staff expressing concern over the
proliferation of signage. She requested that the matter be set for a public
hearing.
No further action was taken by the Council since a second Council Member did
not concur that it should be set.
Bll,
179; CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 1. VARIANCE NO. 4048:
OWNER: Norm Sharf, 7701 Variel Avenue, Canoga Park, California 91304
AGENT: Michael Frazier AIA, 18200 Yorba Linda Boulevard, #201, Yorba
Linda, California 92687
719
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
LOCATION: 1111 West Pearl Street.
Property is approximately .18 acre located on the north side of Pearl
Street approximately 150 feet west of the centerltne of West Street.
Waivers of maximum structural height and permitted encroachments to
retain an existing duplex.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved with modified
conditions 8, 12 and added condition. (ZA90-36)
B12,
179; CECA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 1, VARIANCE NO, 4058;
OWNER: Emad Abdou, 1448 East Forrest Lane, Anaheim, California 92805
LOCATION: 405 East Adele Street
Property is approximately 0.12 acre located on the north side of
Adele Street approximately 80 feet east of the centerline of Olive
Street.
Waiver of minimum side yard and minimum recreation/leisure area to
retain 2 dwelling units.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved with added
conditions (ZA90-37)
B13.
179; CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 1, VARIANCE NO, 4060:
OWNER: Rick Buccola, 1045 Via De Rosa, Anaheim, California 92807
AGENT: Leonard Hundley, 6312 East Santa Aha Canyon Road, #144,
Anaheim, California 92807
LOCATION: 1045 South Via De Rosa
Property is approximately 0.24 acre located on the west side of Via
De Rosa approximately 390 feet south of the centerline of Serrano
Avenue.
Waiver of minimum front yard setback to retain a 100 square foot room
addition to an existing single-family residence.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved (ZA90-38).
Councilwoman Kaywood expressed concern that the room addition and ground
mounted satellite dish were added without permits and brought to the City's
attention through Code Enforcement. She does not want to encourage such
action with requests for approval submitted after the fact.
No further action was taken by the Council on this item.
B14.
179: CECA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 1, VARIANCE NO, 4061;
OWNERS: Ronald J. and Darnell E. Robertson, 701 North West Street,
Anaheim, California 92801
LOCATION: 701 North West Street.
Property is approximately .32 acre located on the west side of West
720
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
Street approximately 240 feet north of the centerline of Pioneer
Drive.
Waiver of minimum structural setbacks to construct a 3-car garage.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved (ZA90-39).
B15,
3291:
179; CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 1, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO,
OWNER: F. J. Hanshaw Enterprises Inc., 10921 Westminster Avenue,
Garden Grove, California 92643
AGENT: Khoda B. Ostowart, 6263 East Twin Peak Drive, Anaheim,
California 92807
LOCATION: 1112 North Brookhurst Street
Property is approximately 0.94 acre located at the northeast corner
of Brookhurst Street and La Palma Avenue.
To permit the expansion of on-sale beer and wine in an existing
restaurant with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved (ZA90-40)
B16,
179; CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3292;
OWNER: Yellen Properties, 3133 Haddington Drive, Los Angeles,
California 90064
AGENT: John Montgomery, 270 East Palais Road, Anaheim, California
92805
LOCATION: 1177 North Magnolia Avenue
Property is approximately .80 acre located at the northeast corner of
Magnolia Avenue and Woodland Avenue.
To permit a vocational (computer) training center with waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved (ZAg0-41)
B17,
3293:
179; CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 1, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO,
OWNER: Mini M. Views Ltd., 1031 Camino Del Retiro, Santa Barbara,
California 93110
AGENT: Larry Gibson Architect, 700 West First Street, #14, Tustin,
California 92680
IDGATION: 2110 South Harbor Boulevard
(Baker's Square Restaurant) Property is approximately .92 acre
located on the east side of Harbor Boulevard approximately 200 feet
south of the centerline of Orangewood Avenue.
To permit a 1,284 square foot addition to a restaurant with on-sale
beer and wine and with waiver of minimum structural setback.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Approved (ZA90-42)
END OF ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ITEMS
721
City Hall. Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
TENTATIVE TRACTS FORM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 2, 1990,
INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS JULY 12, 1990,
B18,
170; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO, 14130;
OWNER: Blash Momeny, 2082 Business Center Drive, Irvine, California
92715
AGENT: Michael Frazier, AIA, 18200 Yorba Linda Boulevard, #201,
Yorba Ltnda, California 92686
LOCATION: Property is approximately 4.4 acres located on the
northwest terminus of Garland Circle and approximately 450 feet west
of the centerline of Botsseranc Way.
To construct two dwelling units within the flood plain overlay zone
to establish a 19-lot (18-unit) residential subdivision with waivers
of required lot frontage and minimum distance between oil drilling
sites and dwelling units.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Conditional Use Permit
No. 3301 and Tentative Map 14130 approved. Approved waiver
concerning minimal distance from oil wells.
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by a group of residents
in the area and submitted by Edward Rados, 4817 Garland Circle and, therefore,
a public hearing will be scheduled at a later date.
Big,
170; TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NOS. 14266, 14267, 14268 AND 14269~
OWNER: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, Attention: Lisa Stipkovich,
200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California 92805
AGENT: Lincoln Property Company, 17011 Beach Boulevard, Suite 400,
Huntington Beach, California 92647
LOCATION: Property is approximately 23.68 acres bounded by Cypress
Street to the north, Center Street and Broadway to the south, Olive
Street and Philadelphia Street to the west and the Atchison Topeka
and Santa Fe railroad right-of-way to the east (Downtown Anaheim).
Petitioner requests consideration and adoption of the Downtown
Anaheim East Center Street Development Specific Plan (Lincoln
Village) including zoning and development standards; and a utilities
and services plan for 390 residential dwelling units (single-family
and multiple-family); 6,600 square feet of commercial uses (in a
mixed commercial/residential use development); and 2.61 acres of
public open space including a train station/community facility.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Specific Plan No. 90-02
approved.
Tentative Maps Tract Nos. 14266, 14267, 14268, 14269 approved.
Environmental Impact Report No. 189 and addendum previously certified.
Appeal period for tracts only expires July 12, 1990. Public Hearing to
consider Specific Plan No. 90-02 scheduled before City Council on July 24,
1990.
722
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
City Clerk Sohl announced that a Mr. Walker has requested to speak to this
item.
Mr. Jim Walker, 217 North Olive Street. Relative to the subject, he is
concerned with quality of life, traffic and parking in the area. Because of
the subject development, cul de sacs have been installed along the other
streets north of Lincoln causing Olive to be a main thoroughfare. In his
particular parcel and the four properties in that block between Lincoln and
Cypress, residents have to back out into oncoming traffic to get out of their
driveways. This is true all the way up Olive to La Palma. Because of the
left hand turn lanes being blocked off on Anaheim Boulevard and East Street
more and more traffic is coming from downtown and going up Olive. There is a
new development going in across the street, the 72 units which are projected
to generate another 380 cars coming out of Cypress onto Olive. At present
there are major accidents all of the time at the corner of Olive and Lincoln
and accidents at Cypress and Olive.
Mayor Hunter interjected and stated that the matter is going to be heard at a
public hearing on July 24, 1990 when those concerns could be addressed; City
Clerk Sohl stated that the Specific Plan will be the subject of the public
hearing. If the Council wishes, the Tentative Tracts could be set for a
hearing at that time as well but that will not be done unless the Council
takes such action. The appeal period for the tracts expires July 12, 1990.
Mr. Walker continued, to solve the problem on Olive, there is going to have to
be a widening of Olive into the Lincoln Properties Development. For the four
houses, there is no way to get in and out. On the tentative tract maps they
are building streets in the tract across the street which are 25 foot
residential streets. There are several cases where they cannot get a full car
off the street in front of the garages and there are no sidewalks. He is told
all the time to look at the total plan and all the great things that are going
to be done. When Redevelopment comes in and builds those places and they are
subsequently sold to private people, it is unfair. Even in the preservation
area they are moving houses in that will not fit the lot. They need a cul de
sac on Olive somewhere between Lincoln and La Palma to break up that flow of
traffic. Only the Council can get Redevelopment to give a quality project.
If they approve the Tentative Tracts with no other exit but Cypress, he feels
something is wrong.
No further action was taken by the Council at this time. Later in the meeting
(approximately 7:45 p.m.) Mr. Walker addressed the Council again under items
of public interest. He asked for clarification relative to Council's action
on the subject item.
Mayor Hunter answered that the Council took no action on the tentative tract
maps; Mr. Walker commented that the Council then "rubber stamped" approval for
the Redevelopment Agency to go ahead and build houses not to Code.
Mayor Hunter stated that the Council also sits as the Redevelopment Agency.
There were public hearings after public hearings held on the Lincoln Village
723
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990, 5;30 P,M,
Development over many months and this is the first time Mr. Walker has spoken
to the development.
Mr. Walker stated that there have been no hearings on the tentative plot plan,
the number of dwellings and parking. He would expect that one of the Council
Members would bring the matter to a public hearing instead of "rubber
stamping" it through the Redevelopment Agency.
ZONING - LAND USE CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS B20 - B27,
ZONING - LAND USE CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Hunter, seconded
by Councilman Ehrle, the following items were approved in accordance with the
reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council Member and
as listed on the Consent Calendar. Councilman Hunter offered Resolution Nos.
90R-249 through 90R-251, both inclusive, for adoption and Ordinance Nos. 5150
through 5152, both inclusive, for first reading.
B20, 179; RESOLUTION NO, 90R-249; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO.
3720 AND DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 87R-498 NULL AND VOID.
179: RESOLUTION NO, 90R-250; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 3721 AND
DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 87R-499 NULL AND VOID.
179; RESOLUTION NO, 90R-251; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 2570 AS
GRANTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 74R-80.
B21, 179; ORDINANCE NO. 5150 (INTRODUCTION); AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Area 1 - Ail properties currently zoned
RM-1200 to be reclassified to the RM-2400 Zone.
Those properties located on the west side of Resh Street currently zoned
RM-2400 to be reclassified to the RS-5000 zone. Ail properties currently
zoned PD-C to be reclassified to the PD-C/RM-2400 Zone.
Area 2 - All properties currently zoned RI~-1200 to be reclassified to the
RM-2400 Zone.
All properties currently zoned PD-¢ to be reclassified to the PD-G/RM-2400
Zone.
Area 3 - Those properties bounded by Cypress Street to the north, the alley
west of Helena Street to the west, Chartres Street to the South and the alley
east of Helena Street to the east and currently zoned RM-1200 to be
reclassified to the RS-5000 Zone.
Those properties bounded by Cypress Street to the north, the alley east of
Helena to the West, Chartres Street to the south and Clementine Street to the
east, and currently zoned RM-1200 to be reclassified to the RM-2400 Zone.)
724
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
B~2, 179; ORDINANCE NO. 5151 (INTRODUCTION): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Area 1 - 4.5 acres bounded by Cypress
Street to the north, Olive Street to the east, Lincoln Avenue to the south and
Claudina Street to the west - to the RS-5000 zone.
Area 2 - 7.8 acres bounded by the alley south of Center Street to the north,
Atchison Street to the east, Broadway to the south and Olive Street to the
west (except the easterly 125 feet).
Properties within Area 2 located west of Melrose street into the RM-2400 zone.
Properties within Area 2 and east of Melrose Street into the RS-5000 Zone,
except those properties which front on Broadway which shall remain in the
RM-2400 zone.)
B23, 179; ORDINANCE NO, 5152 (INTRODUCTION); AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (The subject property consists of 1.26
acres bounded by the alley north of Broadway to the north, Atchison Street to
the east, Broadway to the south, and Melrose Street to the west, except the
easterly 125 feet.)
ORDINANCE NOS, 5147, 5148 and 5146 - ADOPTION:
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCE: The title of the following ordinance was read
by the City Clerk. (Ordinance No. 5147)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinance.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Ordinance No. 5147 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance
Book.
B24, 179; ORDINANCE NO, 5147; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO ZONING. (Property located at 200 West Midway Drive (Midway Trailer Park)
from the RS-7200 zone to the RS-A-43,000 (MI{P) zone.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 5147 duly passed and adopted.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCE; The title of the following ordinance was read
by the City Clerk. (Ordinance No. 5148)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinance.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
725
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
Councilman Hunter offered Ordinance No. 5148 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance
Book.
B25, 179, ORDINANCE NO, 5148; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO ZONING. (Property located at the southwest and southeast portion of Pointe
Premier (a private street) south of Avenue De Santiago from the RS-A-43,000
(SC) zone to the RS-HS-22,000 (SC) zone.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 5148 duly passed and adopted.
B26. 179/149: Directing staff to prepare an ordinance to amend Title 18,
Chapter 18.06, Section 18.06.050 to reflect a 25% limitation of tandem parking
spaces for multiple residential uses.
Councilwoman Kaywood. She noted in the June 25, 1990 staff report that
although a 25% limitation is being recommended on tandem parking, it also
notes that a 15% limitation would even have a significantly greater effect on
reducing on-street parking. She would like the proposed ordinance to reflect
15% instead of 25%. The poll taken among apartment dwellers (see report dated
June 26, 1990 from Public Works/Engineering) showed that of the 72 who
responded, 70% were not in favor of tandem spaces because of the inconvenience
associated with it. Those people then park in the street. If they are
serious about correcting the problem, 15% should be the limit.
Councilman Pickler stated that he did not want it changed to 15% but left at
25%.
Staff was directed to prepare the ordinance as recommended in the staff report
with 25% tandem parking.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCE: The title of the following ordinance was read
by the City Clerk. (Ordinance No. 5146)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinance.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Ordinance No. 5146 for adoption.
B27, ORDINANCE NO. 5146; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM (1) APPROVING DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 90-01 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM AND ANAHEIM CENTER ASSOCIATES, (ii) FINDING THAT THE PROVISIONS OF
SAID AGREEMENT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
AND (iii) AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT FOR
726
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. (Development Agreement No. 90-01, Anaheim Center
Associates, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, and City of Anaheim to implement
Koll Anaheim Center Project.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 5146 duly passed and adopted.
C1, 108; HEARING - REQUEST FOR ABATEMENT OF PENALTY AND INTEREST - PAN
PACIFIC HOTEL: To consider the request of Pan Pacific Hotel for abatement of
the penalty and interest assessment in the amount of $8,926.36 in connection
with payment of the Transient Occupancy Tax.
Submitted was report dated June 18, 1990 from the City Treasurer, Mary Turner
recommending denial of the request.
This matter was heard at the meeting of June 26, 1990 (see minutes that date)
and testimony received from a representative of the Pan Pacific Hotel. At the
conclusion, a motion was offered to waive the penalty which failed to carry
because of a tie vote. The matter was then continued to this date for full
Council action.
MOTION; Councilman Hunter moved to approve the request to waive the penalty
assessed relative to the late payment of Pan Pacific Hotel. Councilman Ehrle
seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood spoke against the motion.
Although the check was received a day late, there is a 30 day leeway when the
hotel is using those funds. Major hotels walk their payments over to the
City. It is money that belongs to the City. It is not just a day late but in
reality 31 days late.
Councilwoman Kaywood moved to deny the request for a waiver.
Mayor Hunter referred to his motion which is to be acted upon first; City
Attorney White. The Mayor's motion can only go to the penalty portion since
the interest portion of $44.41 cannot be waived. Thus the waiver would be in
the amount of $8,881.95.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion waiving the penalty portion of
the penalty and interest assessed amounting to $8,881.95. Gouncilwoman
Kaywood voted no. MOTION CARRIED.
727
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
C2. ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST;
Nicolas Bortts. Speaking through an interpreter he explained that he has been
working for three years to develop a parcel in Anaheim Hills to build seven
homes. He has been present before asking for help to build the properties but
he does not get a response or help. The tentative map (tentative map, tract
no. 11780) expired last month. He is asking Council's help to extend the map
so he can start construction on his property. The grading company and
construction company have signed an agreement and he can start working before
the tentative map is approved.
Mayor Hunter. The Council has no information at all regarding Mr. Bortis'
concern and request. They would need some documentation or Mr. Bortis should
contact the Planning Department or the legal staff.
City Attorney White. The answer to Mr. Bortts is simple. Once a tentative
map expires, by law, the City has no further jurisdiction and a new tentative
map has to be filed. The City cannot override that provision since it is a
matter of State law.
Colin McClane, Orangetree Mobile Home Park. He referred to the latest
long-term lease, copies of which had been submitted to the Council. Many Park
residents have objected to the lease because of the extensive pass throughs
placed upon them which he briefed. Those who did not sign the lease have
experienced a 40% rent increase, the average rent now being $667.00 a month.
If the Council allows these continued practices by the owner, it will cause an
eviction of one class of residents, those on fixed or limited incomes, to be
replaced by those who can buy a new coach and afford the rent. Many residents
are being forced to sell their coaches at a lesser rate. Some people are
abandoning their homes. It is retaliatory economic eviction. He urged the
Council to form an ad hoc committee for purposes of investigating the business
practices in question and placing a rent freeze on the park until the
investigation is complete.
Don Bambrook, Orangetree Mobile Home Park, #204. He spoke to the charges on
their water bill which used to be called customer charges and is now called
water distribution fee. He explained how Park residents are being overcharged
for water amounting to what he calculated to be $16,070.40 net profit for the
park owner per year. He wanted to know how the park owner can get away with
that.
Jess Ehrert, Orangetree Mobile Home Park, Space 153. Her rent was $365 when
she moved in six and one half years ago. It is now $667. The residents just
exist - they do not live. She is asking that the Council do something about
this rent "gouging".
728
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
Wanda Furdek, Orangetree Mobilehome Park, Space 171. When the residents spoke
to the Council the last time, Councilman Daly stated he did not want staff to
spend any time developing a draft ordinance to assist them. She feels it is
government's role to serve their people. On June 25, the residents at
Orangetree received a letter from Mr. Barngrover in which he indicated rents
could be $1200 to $1500 for those who do not sign a lease. $667 is
intolerable for her at this time period. There are many homes for sale going
for nothing. Mr. Stanaland, the Park owner, has no intention of stopping any
rent increases. She is asking that staff be allowed to spend time to analyze
the leases as well as the Council. She is asking for their time as well as a
rent freeze or an ordinance.
Mike Johnson, Orangetree Mobile Home Park, Space 227. He referred to a letter
dated July 9, 1990 from Tom Davis which he then read regarding the business
activities of Vickie Talley, Manufactured Housing Educational Trust, the
Orange County Mobile Home Park Owners Association and Orange County Mobile
Home Assistance Program. The letter also addressed the "so called" Orange
County Mobile Home Rental Assistance Program.
Vickie Talley. She requested a copy of the letter which she had not seen and
also stated she has no idea who Tom Davis is. She then explained that Talley
and Associates operates with a Home Occupation Permit and with a proper
Business License in the City of Anaheim. The Mobile Home Park Owners
Association, the Manufactured Housing Educational Trust, is a client of Talley
and Associates with at one time a business office and license in the City of
Irvine. Not needing a business office, it was removed and moved to a post
office box in Anaheim. She was not aware it was necessary to have a separate
business license operating out of a post office box with no ownership or
office. She received a call from Code Enforcement last Friday bringing this
to her attention. She is happy to pay the $31 fee for the license to correct
the misunderstanding. It is in process right now. Her business has always
operated with appropriate permits and has always paid its business license.
Now knowing it is necessary for the non-profit association, which is a client
of Talley and Associates, she is more than happy to pay the $31 fee.
Linda Pu§h, 1085 West Dudley - ¢. She proposes that the money be found within
the City budget to hire ten new patrol officers. From within the Department,
she would like to see ten men promoted - five in the detective/investigation
in the Gang Division and five within the Narcotics Division. It can be called
a Special Strike Team and Narcotics Division within the Police Force. Most
times a caller gets a recording and that should never be. Her home has been
burglarized three different times by gangs on drugs. The situation is getting
worse and something has to be done. For a City the size of Anaheim, she feels
they can find the money for ten patrol officers.
729
City Hall, Anaheim. California COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
Mayor Hunter. The City has hired or will be hiring quite a few new police
officers and has also made adjustments from within. He believes the figure is
31 with readjustments and new police officers. These officers will be on the
streets doing police work. The City has grown and the Council is aware of the
needs. The entire Council in the last budget session unanimously approved the
police increase and making internal adjustments.
A41, 123: HEARING - CITY OF ANAHEIM WEED ABATEMENT ROLL 1990-91; To receive
public comment/objections on the proposed weed abatement roll. Submitted was
report dated July 3, 1990 from Fire Chief, Jeff Bowman recommending acceptance
of the written report of the Fire Chief regarding the cost of weed abatement
incurred during the 1990/91 weed abatement contract with Edwin Webber, Jr. to
be submitted to the County Assessor's Office.
Mayor Hunter opened the hearing and asked to hear from those who had comments
and or objections to the City of Anaheim 1990-91 weed abatement roll; there
being no response, the hearing was closed.
MOTION; Councilman Hunter moved to accept the written report of the Fire
Chief regarding the cost of weed abatement during the 1990/91 Weed Abatement
contract with Edwin Webber, Inc. to be submitted to the County Assessor's
Office as tax liens. Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
A42. 105: BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT TO TERMS
EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1990; This item was continued from the meeting of June 26,
1990 to this date for full Council action.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TERM EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1994
(Bristol, Berry): Councilman Ehrle nominated Steve Bristol and Donna Berry;
there being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Steve Bristol and Donna Berry were thereupon unanimously reappointed to the
Community Redevelopment Commission for the term ending June 30, 1994.
COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD FOR THE NEW TERM EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1994 (Crow, Lowry,
Miser, Rizzo, Terrell, Yawn): Councilman Pickler nominated Bryan Crow, June
Lowry, Martha Miser, Michael Rizzo, Jacquelyn Terrell and Michael Yawn; there
being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Bryan Crow, June Lowry, Martha Miser, Michael Rizzo, Jacquelyn Terrell and
Michael Yawn were thereupon unanimously reappointed to the Community Services
Board for the term ending June 30, 1994.
HOUSING COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1994 (Ersek) AND TERMS
EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1992 (Tenant Members Bennett, Taylor): Councilman Daly
nominated Joseph Ersek, Michael Bennett and Alice Taylor; Councilwoman Kaywood
noted that Mr. Bennett did not wish to be reappointed.
730
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
Councilman Pickler asked that they request a recommendation from the Housing
Commission on a person to fill the one tenant member seat.
Councilman Daly amended his nomination to include only Mr. Ersek and Mrs.
Taylor; there being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Joseph Ersek and Alice Taylor were thereupon unanimously reappointed to the
Housing Commission for the terms ending June 30, 1994 for Mr. Ersek and June
30, 1992 for Mrs. Taylor as the tenant member.
LIBRARY BOARD FOR THE NEW TERM EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1994 (McClain, Terrell):
Councilman Pickler nominated Jean McClain and La France Terrell; there being
no further nominees, nominations were closed.
Jean McClain and La France Terrell were thereupon unanimously reappointed to
the Library Board for the terms expiring June 30, 1994.
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1994 -
MEMBERS AT LARGE (Wallace, one Vacancy): Councilman Daly nominated Gladys
Wallace for reappointment and nominated Hersh Cherson to be appointed for the
term ending June 30, 1994; there being no further nominations, nominations
were closed.
Gladys Wallace was thereupon unanimously reappointed and Herst Cherson
unanimously appointed to the Park and Recreation Commission for the term
ending June 30, 1994.
PLANNING COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1994 (McBurney, One
Vacancy): Councilwoman Kaywood nominated A1 Peraza to fill the vacancy on the
Planning Commission left by Lew Herbst; Councilman Ehrle nominated Chuck
McBurney.
Councilman Daly stated he was going to propose that the incumbent seat of Mr.
McBurney be continued for one week.
Councilman Daly then moved to continue for two weeks action on the incumbent
seat of Mr. McBurney. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Nominations were then closed on the vacant seat since there were no further
nominations for that seat.
Mr. A1 Peraza was thereupon unanimously appointed to the Planning Commission
for the term ending June 30, 1994.
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD FOR THE NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1994 (McMillan,
Schmahl): Councilwoman Kaywood nominated R. J. McMillan and Robert Schmahl;
there being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
R. J. McMtllan and Robert Schmahl were thereupon unanimously reappointed to
the Public Utilities Board for the terms ending June 30, 1994.
731
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M.
SENIOR CITIZEN COMMISSION FOR THE NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1993 (Hawley,
Sarno, Scherman): Councilwoman Kaywood nominated Warren Hawley, Ralph Sarno
and Frances Scherman; there being no further nominations, nominations were
closed.
Warren Hawley, Ralph Sarno and Frances Scherman were thereupon unanimously
reappointed to the Senior Citizen Commission for the terms ending June 30,
1993.
A43. 127; RESOLUTIONS CALLING THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION - NOVEMBER 6,
1990 AND REQUESTING CONSOLIDATION WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION;
Submitted was report dated July 6, 1990 from City Clerk Leonora Sohl
recommending adoption of certain resolutions required to call the General
Municipal Election in November, 1990. Also included was a resolution prepared
by the City Attorney incorporating the Charter Amendments previously reviewed
and approved by the Council as well as a resolution providing for rebuttal
arguments which is entirely optional; however, if the Council wishes to have
rebuttal arguments, the decision must be made at the same time as the election
is called.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS; The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 90R-252 through 90R-257, both
inclusive.
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution Nos. 90R-252 through 90R-257, both
inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 90R-252: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING REGULATIONS FOR CANDIDATES FOR ELECTIVE OFFICE
PERTAINING TO CANDIDATES STATEMENTS SUBMITTED TO THE VOTERS AT AN ELECTION TO
BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1990.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-253; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA, CALLING AND GIVING NOTICE OF THE HOLDING OF A GENERAL
MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY, NOVEMBER 6, 1990, FOR THE ELECTION
OF CERTAIN OFFICERS AS REQUIRED BY THE PROVISIONS OF THE CHARTER.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-254; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO THE ELECTORS OF SAID CITY
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER OF SAID CITY AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 6, 1990.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-255: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF THE COUNTY OF
ORANGE TO CONSOLIDATE A GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON TUESDAY,
NOVEMBER 6, 1990, WITH THE STATEWIDE GENERAL ELECTION TO BE HELD ON THE DATE
PURSUANT TO SECTION 23302 OF THE ELECTIONS CODE.
732
City Hall, Anaheim, CalSfornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 10. 1990. 5:30 P.M,
RESOLUTION NO. 90R-256: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA, PROVIDING FOR THE FILING OF REBUTTAL ARGUMENTS FOR CITY
MEASURES SUBMITTED AT MUNICIPAL ELECTIONS.
RESOLUTION NO. 90R-257: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CALIFORNIA, SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING
CITY MEASURES AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS.
Before a vote was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood asked relative to rebuttal
arguments, is someone assigned to write the arguments for.
City Clerk Sohl answered that the Council can assign someone to write the
arguments in favor and then have rebuttals.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked for clarification that in fact the Council would
have to ask someone to do the rebuttal or they will miss the opportunity; City
Clerk Sohl answered yes but they do not have to assign a particular person.
Mrs. Sohl asked if the Council wished to assign someone to write arguments in
favor; it was determined it would be decided later who would be assigned to
write the arguments, the Council or their designee.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolutions.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 90R-252 through 90R-257, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
Before concluding, Mrs. Sohl stated as indicated in her report, she has given
two options regarding the voters pamphlets. If the Council has no feeling
against it, she would recommend that the City engage Martin and Chapman,
Election Consultants and send a separate voter pamphlet primarily because of
the length of the Charter amendments. There is also some cost savings; the
City Council concurred with the City Clerk's recommendation.
ADJOURNMENT; Councilman Hunter moved to adjourn.
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8:40 p.m.)
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
Councilwoman Kaywood
733