1990/07/31City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 31, 1990, 5:30 P.M,
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER:
ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY:
CITY CLERK:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler, Hunter
None
James Ruth
Bob Franks
Leonora N. Sohl
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 4:24 p.m. on July 27, 1990 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all
items as shown herein.
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present,
and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. (4:10 p.m.)
MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting of June 19, 1990. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $4,500,755.62, in
accordance with the 1990-91 budget, were approved.
1. 127/142. DISCUSSION - CHARTER AMENDMENTS RECOMMENDED FOR THE NOVEMBER
BALLOT AND SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 90R-254:
City Clerk~Sohl. The only item to consider at this regular meeting is the
Charter amendments which have previously been set by Resolution No. 90R-254
adopted on July 10, 1990. The Council has copies of the wording of all the
Charter amendments and another copy of memo dated July 20, 1990 which
indicates the two groups of amendments - those that have less and those that
would have more impact.
She has also submitted an addendum to allow the Council to review tentative
tracts which were acted upon at the Planning Commission meeting of July 30,
1990 since the appeal period ends August 9, 1990. The Council or citizens
will have an opportunity to appeal any of those items until 5:00 p.m. August
9, 1990..
Mayor Hunter. In order to get the issues on the table, he moved that proposed
Charter Amendment Section 502 pertaining to Mayor and Council salaries not be
placed on the November ballot and that present salaries remain as is.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion for purposes of discussion.
Councilman Daly. The salary matter was discussed very thoroughly by the
citizens' Charter Review Committee (CRC): City Clerk Sohl then clarified that
the current salaries were set in the City Charter in 1964 at the time the
Charter was adopted.
Councilman Daly continued that to keep pace with the size of the City,
responsibilities of the City Council and the size of the City budget, it is in
818
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 31, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
order to place a salary increase on the ballot whether this November or for a
future election - sometime in the next couple of years. He is also proposing
that City staff prepare a revised Charter Amendment which would delete the CPI
(Consumer Price Index) increase aspect asking the voters to increase salaries
from $400 to $1200 as the CRC recommended but without the CPI factor. For
discussion purposes, he will support the revised language. Since it is an
election year, if there is a desire to keep the salary discussion away from
the election, he respects that and will probably go along with that.
Councilman Pickler. The CRC made a recommendation that the Council all agree
to. He wanted to increase salaries only to $800 a month but did not get a
second and it was left at $1200; Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she seconded
that motion.
Councilman Pickler. The Council formed a Charter Review Committee to
recommend amendments to the Charter which he believed came with a unanimous
vote. He thereupon moved that the recommendations of the Charter Review
Committee remain as they were submitted and put on the ballot as they are and
let the people decide.
Before further action was taken, City Clerk Sohl clarified for Councilman
Pickler that the CRC met from April of 1989 to February of 1990. He (Pickler)
feels that after all the time and effort put forth, it would show little
regard for the work the Committee has done.
Councilman Daly. His primary reason for wanting to meet today is his concern
that the 17 measures to be presented to the voters are too many at one time.
The Committee had suggested that the amendments be divided up into a couple of
different elections.
Councilman Pickler. He has no problem in eliminating some of the amendments
at this time but the issue regarding the Mayor and Council salaries should be
placed on the ballot as it is, and at this election, and let the people
decide.
City Clerk Sohl then clarified for Councilman Ehrle that the reason today is
the deadline for the Council to make a decision whether or not the proposed
Charter amendments will be placed on the November ballot, this is the last
opportunity for the Council to do so before the August 10 deadline for
submittal of the amendments for the ballot. It is according to the California
Elections Code. The Council is not scheduled to meet on August 7, 1990.
Today is the last logical regular meeting date unless the Mayor wanted to call
a special meeting.
Councilman Ehrle noted that Mrs. Jo Ann Barnett, Chairperson of the CRC was
present in the Chamber audience. He asked to hear from her relative to the
feelings of the Committee on the Council salary amendment.
Jo Ann Barnett. It was the hardest issue they faced. Salaries were
established in the Charter when it was adopted in 1964 and the figures have
819
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 31, 1990, 5:30 P,M.
not been raised since. The Committee tried to agree on a fair figure to
compensate Council Members and the Mayor for their time away from their
businesses and a figure to possibly allow people who would like to run the
opportunity to do so since the Council has been impacted with retired people
who have free time. They asked the City Clerk to research other cities
relative to Council salaries - cities of comparable size. It was found that
Anaheim is the least paid° Some other cities have a different form of
government where Council Members are full time and thus their salaries wore
higher. The Committee also included a CPI factor because they felt if tho
cost of living went up or down there should be a small adjustment every three
years.
Mayor Hunter. He reminded the Council he made a motion to not place the
proposed amendment regarding Section 502, Council salaries, on the ballot.
Perhaps the best thing to do if there was a special election in the future, it
could be placed on the ballot at that time in an "off-election" year so that
there will be no "oneupsmanship" regarding Council salaries. If the Council
is not unanimous on the issue, it should not bo placed on the ballot at this
time.
City Clerk Sohl explained for Councilman Ehrle that City Attorney White has
written impartial analyses for the amendments and the Council has designated
themselves to write arguments in favor or against.
Councilman Ehrle asked who had requested to write the argument against the
salary amendment; Councilwoman Kaywood answered that she did.
Councilman Ehrle. Because the Council would not be unanimous in placing the
issue on the ballot his second to the Mayor's motion stands.
Councilman Pickler. He does not care if somebody writes an argument against.
The amendment should bo put on the ballot now to lot the people decide.
Council discussion and debate followed on the salary issue. At the conclusion
of the discussion Assistant City Attorney Bob Franks stated he has procedural
concerns relative to the motion offered which would amend Resolution
No. 90R-254. Instead, a resolution could be offered to amend the prior
resolution deleting the recommendations or the attachment concerning the
compensation of the City Council.
Mayor Hunter thereupon revised his action.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 90R-290 for adoption amending
Resolution No. 90R-254 relating to the General Municipal Election to be held
on November 6, 1990 eliminating Measure 17, Section 502 relating to Council
salaries. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 90R-290: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90R-254 RELATING TO THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL
ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 6, 1990.
820
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 31, 1990, 5:30 P,M.
Before action was taken Councilman Pickler moved for a closed session; no
action was taken on that request.
Councilman Daly reiterated his primary reason for asking for the meeting today
is due to the number of amendments with which the voters will be inundated
including approximately 17 State propositions or approximately 34 measures.
It is a disservice to put 17 Charter amendments before the voters at one time.
Councilwoman Kaywood. She spoke against removing any of the other items
because each was given full discussion and thought by the Committee and
Council. Five of them are very technical and comply with State Legislature
requirements. On ten, there is a great deal of money to be saved for the
City. To drag this out and make it another two years, four years or a special
election, she feels this will be a real disservice to the citizens.
Councilman Daly. He disagreed although he does agree relative to money
savings regarding some of the amendments. Perhaps Mrs. Barnett and staff
could help in prioritizing the amendments, cut the number down and put the
remaining amendments on future ballots.
Mayor Hunter. It would be best to discuss the amendments one by one but in
any case his offering of Resolution No. 90R-290 eliminating Measure 17,
Section 502 relating to Council salaries still stands.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 90R-290)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing Resolution and carried by the following
vote:
AYES:
NOES:
Ehrle, Kaywood, Hunter
Daly, Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 90R-290 duly passed and adopted.
Jo Ann Barnett. She personally feels that 17 amendments are too many to
present at one time. The technical changes recommended are those that bring
the Charter in compliance with State law. The Committee reported in time so
that the Council would have an opportunity to separate the amendments and
place them on two different ballots. The Committee was not concerned about
when they were placed on the ballot. The Committee spent a great deal of time
on water and electric revenue bonds. The amendments as listed on the second
page of the report make the heart of the City run.
Mayor Hunter noted then that there are 11 substantive amendments to be
considered after having eliminated Measure 17 (Council salaries); Councilman
821
6 7!
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 31, 1990, 5:30 P,M,
Daly. Starting with Measure No. three, they have discussed 4, 7 and 8 as
being priorities.
Jo Ann Barnett added Measures No. 16, water and electric revenue bonds.
Further Council discussion and clarification by staff followed wherein input
was given on why some amendments should be included on the ballot. In the
final analysis, the Council agreed that the following measures/Charter
amendments be included on the November 6, 1990 General Municipal Election
ballot representing substantive amendments:
Measure 4 - SHALL SECTIONS 515 AND 1501 OF THE CITY CHARTER BE AMENDED TO
INCREASE THE MAXIMUM FINE FOR CHARTER OR ORDINANCE VIOLATIONS FROM $500 TO
$1000 AND TO ALLOW FUTURE FINE INCREASES IN CONFORMANCE WITH STATE LAW?
Measure 5 SHALL SECTION 518 OF THE CITY CHARTER BE AMENDED TO EXPRESSLY
AUTHORIZE STADIUM AND CONVENTION CENTER EVENT AGREEMENTS TO BE EXECUTED BY THE
STADIUM AND CONVENTION CENTER GENERAL MANAGERS AT RATES FIXED OR AUTHORIZED BY
THE CITY COUNCIL?
Measure 7 - SHALL SECTIONS 604 AND 1206 OF THE CITY CHARTER BE AMENDED TO
AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO CONTRACT FOR SERVICES UNDER THE CITY'S CENTRALIZED
PURCHASING SYSTEM?
Measure 8 - SHALL SECTIONS 705, 706 AND 1216 OF THE CITY CHARTER BE AMENDED TO
AUTHORIZE THE USE OF NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS (CHECKS) WHICH ARE LESS EXPENSIVE
THAN THE CITY WARRANTS CURRENTLY REQUIRED FOR PAYMENT OF CITY OBLIGATIONS, AND
TO INCREASE THE TIME LIMIT FOR PRESENTATION OF CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY FROM
100 DAYS TO SIX MONTHS TO CONFORM TO CURRENT STATE LAW?
Measure 13 - SHALL SECTION 511 OF THE CITY CHARTER BE AMENDED TO AUTHORIZE THE
CITY COUNCIL TO ADOPT A SINGLE MOTION AT ANY CITY COUNCIL MEETING WAIVING THE
ORAL READING OF THE COMPLETE TEXT OF ALL ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS ADOPTED AT
SUCH MEETING IN LIEU OF THE CURRENT PROCEDURE WHICH REQUIRES A SEPARATE WAIVER
FOR EACH ORDINANCE OR RESOLUTION?
Measure 14 - SHALL SECTION 1401 OF THE CITY CH~kRTER BE A/~ENDED TO AUTHORIZE
THE CITY COUNCIL TO GRANT FRANCHISES UPON THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS SPECIFIED
IN THE ORDINANCE GRANTING THE FRANCHISE?
Measure 15 SHALL SECTION 1221 OF THE CITY GHARTER BE AMENDED TO AUTHORIZE
THE CITY COUNCIL, WITH REGARD TO THE CITY'S WATER AND ELECTRIC UTILITIES, TO
ESTABLISH RATEPAYER DISCOUNT AND OTHER PROGRAMS TO ASSIST RESIDENTIAL
CUSTOMERS IN THE PAYMENT OF THEIR UTILITY BILLS AND ALLOWING THE COST OF SUCH
PROGRAMS TO BE PAID FROM THE CITY'S UTILITY REVENUES?
Measure 16 SHALL SECTION 1210 OF THE CITY CHARTER BE AMENDED, AND SHALL NEW
SECTIONS 1210.2 AND 1210.3 BE ADDED THERETO, AUTHORIZING THE CITY COUNCIL TO
SELL AND ISSUE WATER AND ELECTRIC UTILITY BONDS AND NOTES WHICH ARE NOT PAID
FROM PROPERTY TAXES AND DO NOT CONSTITUTE AN INDEBTEDNESS OR GENERAL
822
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 31, 1990, 5:30 P.M~
OBLIGATION OF THE CITY, WITHOUT AN ELECTION, UNDER LIMITED CIRCUMSTANCES
PRESCRIBED IN THE MEASURE?
The measures would then be renumbered one through eight on the ballot.
City Clerk Sohl. It is her understanding then that the Council will hold in
abeyance the remaining recommendations and these would be submitted to the
Council for future consideration.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 90R-291)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 90R-291 for adoption amending
Resolution No. 90R-254 relating to the General Municipal Election to be held
November 6, 1990 affirming submission to the electorate of Measures 4, 5, 7,
8, 13, 14, 15 and 16 to be renumbered 1 through 8 with the remaining measures
to be resubmitted for subsequent elections. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 90R-291; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 90R-254 RELATING TO ORDERING THE SUBMISSION TO
THE ELECTORS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CHARTER OF SAID
CITY AT THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION TO BE HELD IN SAID CITY ON NOVEMBER 6,
1990
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood, Pickler and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 90R-291 duly passed and adopted.
Jo Ann Barnett. They all enjoy the City and want it to be the best in the
State. Perhaps instead of reviewing the Charter every 10 years it should be
reviewed every 2 years.
Councilman Ehrle. He feels a way to insure that the amendments will pass is
to have the pro arguments signed by the Charter Review Committee.
City Clerk Sohl. On two of the issues, the Utilities representative has
written the arguments for as well as two others signed by the Finance
Department. The Resolution indicates the Council or its designees. The
Council could designate the Finance Director or Treasurer, for example, on the
the ones that affect the warrant system.
Councilman Daly asked if the Council files the argument can anybody then sign
the argument.
823
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - July 31, 1990, 5;30 P.M.
City Clerk Sohl stated that she believes the Council could elect to have
others sign.
Councilman Daly suggested that they invite the Chairperson and other members
of the Charter Review Committee to sign the arguments in favor since they
recommended the amendments; Councilman Ehrle agreed. He feels any time
citizens write the arguments in favor or against it has more "clout" than
bureaucrats doing so.
City Clerk Sohl. She does not know if it will be possible to reach all of the
members of the CRC in the time left to submit arguments but could have
Chairperson Barnett sign and possibly the Vice Chairperson; Councilman Daly.
He feels the opportunity should be given to members of the community including
Mrs. Barnett to file the arguments in favor.
Before concluding, Councilman Pickler asked if a motion to reconsider a
Council action taken is in order.
Bob Franks, Assistant City Attorney. A motion to reconsider could be made by
a member of the affirmative side. There could be a motion to rescind a prior
action but to rescind or appeal is different from a motion to reconsider.
Anyone can make a motion to rescind a prior action.
No further action was taken by the Council relating to Charter amendments.
2. ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST:
Ann Newberry. She is present representing the Angels Booster Club. She
presented along with her fellow Club members a petition to Mayor Fred Hunter.
She would like it placed on the agenda for the next Council meeting. (Mrs.
Newberry submitted the petition.) They feel Gene Autry is a fine asset to the
community as well as the state and nation. They would like to see the stadium
name changed to read Gene Autry Stadium. This is the appropriate time. The
stadium will be 25 years old. There are a lot of people getting behind this
movement.
Lou Bronca, 1742 Partridge. He supports Ms. Newberry's motion to change the
name from Anaheim Stadium to Gene Autry Stadium.
Councilwoman Kaywood. She notes the petition contains names but no addresses
which is unusual.
Ann Newberry. The names are those of Angels Booster Club Members which is a
nationwide club. They do not have boundaries within the City of Anaheim.
Four members are present today. Attendance at their regular meetings are
generally 125 to 150 members. There are approximately 400 members in the
club. Probably one third of the members are Anaheim residents, but there are
members from Los Angeles County as well that attend their meetings and there
are members who live outside the country. She is the first vice president.
824
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - July 31, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
The president is not an Anaheim resident. There are probably 4 on the board
who are residents of Anaheim.
Councilman Ehrle. He does not have a problem in discussing the issue but is
not indicating a yes or no vote at this time. It is an Anaheim municipal
facility owned by the 250,000 people of Anaheim who take a lot of pride in
their stadium known as Anaheim Stadium. He would not be opposed to agendiztng
the matter for discussion.
Councilwoman Kaywood. She is concerned about placing it on the August 14,
1990 agenda since it is expected to be a particularly heavy agenda; Councilman
Pickler. He feels the Council should give some thought to the matter and
agendize it at a later date.
Mayor Hunter. He would like to see it on the agenda. Mr. Autry is now 82
years old. Were it not for Gene Autry putting a team together called the
Angels and then deciding to come to Anaheim, there would never have been an
Anaheim Stadium. It is an item that is open for discussion. There are a lot
of people interested in having the Council discuss the matter.
Councilman Pickler. He feels that the Mayor has made up his mind about what
he wants to name the stadium but he (Pickler) has not done that yet. He is
not going to be rushed into agendiztng something. Not to take away anything
that Mr. Autry has done but he is not ready to rush into this or to place the
matter on an agenda at this time.
Councilman Daly. Based on this evening's discussion, he feels they should let
the issue "air" for a while. He is uncomfortable scheduling the matter for
August 14, 1990.
Mayor Hunter noted that there would not be three votes to do so; Councilman
Ehrle suggested that they discuss the matter at another time.
108/142. POSSIBLE MODIFICATION OF BUSINESS LICENSE TAX: Councilman Ehrle.
He would like to see set for the August 14, 1990 agenda a discussion of the
City's business license tax and to invite the Chamber of Commerce to
participate in the discussion. He would like to look at perhaps reducing it
substantially, cutting it in half or looking at it in some modified version.
Councilwoman Kaywood. She believes there are ongoing discussions on the
matter; Councilman Daly. He recalls that staff was requested to discuss the
issue relative to some categories and to report to the Council but is not
certain when that is to occur.
City Clerk Sohl. The report back to the Council was not set for a specific
date but the Council did ask for an informational report. She believes it
will come through the agenda process.
Councilman Ehrle. He would like to see it hurried along and come back to the
Council in about four weeks.
825
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 31, 1990, 5:30 P.M.
City Manager Ruth. The Chamber has asked for a meeting with him to discuss
their proposal for some changes in the business license tax sometime within
the next week or ten days.
Councilman Pickler. He does not feel they can put a time limit on this
matter. Staff already has direction to bring the business license tax back
because they want to see some changes. It is in the works and he suggested
that it take its course instead of accommodating a certain group of people.
PREVAILING WAGE RATE RESOLUTION: Mayor Hunter. This is regarding a
housekeeping item. Under public works contracts for the City, there is a
prevailing wage resolution governing those contracts. In talking with
Mrs. Stipkovich, Executive Director of Community Development, no resolution
has been adopted for the Redevelopment Agency. It is apparently an oversight
and needs to be placed on an agenda to adopt such a resolution for the Agency
as well.
City Manager Ruth. He will see that it is done. He clarified that it has to
be adopted by resolution.
ADDENDUM TO THE JULY 31, 1990 COUNCIL AGENDA
ITEMS Bi - B4 FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JULY 30, 1990:
INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS AUGUST 9, 1990
BI. CEOA MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-04,
TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 13926
OWNER: SOUTHRIDGE DEVELOPMENT, 22421 Gilberto, Rancho Santa Margarita, 92678
AGENT: ROBERT D. MICHAELSON, 328 N. Glassell, Orange, GA 92666
LOCATION: Property is approximately 2.85 acres located at the southerly
terminus of Londerry Lane approximately 230 feet south of the centerline of
Andover Drive.
For a change in zone from RS-A-43,000(SC) to RS-HS-10,0OO(SG), and to
establish a 5-lot (4 residential, and one common lot) single-family
residential subdivision.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Tentative Tract Map No. 13926 APPROVED (5 yes votes, 1 abstained, and 1
vacancy).
Approved Mitigated Negative Declaration.
NOTE: Reclassification No. 90-91-04 has a 22-day appeal period which expires
August 21, 1990. This item to appear on the Council agenda of August 21, 1990
for information purposes.
826
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - July 31, 1990, 5:30 P,M.
B2, CEOA NEGATIVE DECLARATION IN CONJUNCTION WITH PREVIOUSLY APPROVED EIR
NO, 283,WAIVER OF CODE REOUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3304, SITE PLAN
APPROVAL FOR TRACT MAP, NO, 12996 OF SYCAMORE CANYON, SPECIFIC PLAN 88-1,
DEVELOPMENT AREA 2
OWNER: WEIR PARTNERS LTD., 620 Newport Center Drive, #840, Newport Beach, CA
92660
AGENT: TRIAD PARTNERS, INC., Attn: Joseph Carroll, 620 Newport Center Drive,
#840, Newport Beach, CA 92660
LOCATION: Property is approx. 11.9 acres located at the southwest corner of
Weir Canyon Rd. and Serrano Ave.
To permit a 121,499 square foot, 47-unit commercial retail shopping center
including a 1,000 square foot service station with convenience market, an
8,000 square foot semi-enclosed restaurant, with on-sale alcoholic beverage a
45,000 sq. ft. market, a 7,800 sq. ft. drug store and a 4,524 sq. ft. bank
with waivers of min. structural and landscaped setback from scenic highways,
commercial entry signs, min. number of parking spaces, required wall height
adjacent Canyon Creek Road and roof-mounted equipment prohibited.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Site Plan Approval for Tract Map No. 12996 of Sycamore Canyon Specific Plan
88-1, Development Area 2 APPROVED (6 yes votes and 1 vacancy).
Approved Negative Declaration in conjunction with previously approved EIR No.
283.
NOTE: CUP No. 3304 has a 22-day appeal period which expires August 21, 1990.
This item to appear on the Council agenda of August 21, 1990 for information
purposes.
B3, CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO 14363
OWNER: DONALD FORBES, 131 Terranza San Angelo, La Habra, CA 90631
AGENT: GEORGE KARAJAGIC, 720 Town and Country Rd., Orange, CA 92668
LOCATION: 1001 North West St. Property is approx. 0.88 acre located on the
west side of West Street and 360 feet south of the centerline of La Palma Ave.
To establish a 5-lot single-family subdivision.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Tentative Tract Map No. 14363 APPROVED (5 yes votes, 1 abstained and 1
vacancy).
Approved Negative Declaration.
B4, CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION, VARIANCE NO. 4072, TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO,
14342
OWNER: LYNDA SPRAGUE, 1305 1/2 W. North Street, Anaheim, CA 92804
AGENT: HOSTERT CONSTR. & DEVELOP., P.O. Box 5410, Fullerton, CA 92635
LOCATION: 1305-1309 W. North Street. Property is approx. 0.91 acre located
on the north side of North Street and located approx. 225 feet west of the
centerline of Redondo Street West.
To establish a 5-lot residential subdivision with waivers of required lot
frontage, maximum fence height and single-family structure orientation.
827
141
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES July 31, 1990, 5;30 P,M,
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Tentative Tract Map No. 14342 APPROVED (6 yes votes and 1 vacancy).
NOTE: Variance No. 4072 has a 22-day appeal period which expires August 21,
1990. This item to appear on the Council agenda of August 21, 1990 for
information purposes.
Approved Negative Declaration.
END OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS FROM JULY 30, 1990.
ADJOURNMENT; By general consent the City Council adjourned. (5:18 p.m.) It
is not anticipated that a quorum will be present for the meeting of August 7,
1990; therefore, the next Council meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, August 14,
1990 at 4:00 p.m.
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
828