1989/06/27City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1:30 P,M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Bob Simpson
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR: Dave Morgan
FINANCE DIRECTOR: George Ferrone
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Annika Santalahti
TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Paul Singer
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 3:35 p.m. on June 23, 1989 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all
items as shown herein.
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 12:00 noon.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Jack Whtte requested a Closed
Session to consider the following items:
a. To confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball
Co. vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No.
40-92-46; City of Anaheim vs. Anaheim Hotel Partnership, O.C.S.C.C.
No. 46-96-59; Golding vs. City of Anaheim et al. O.C.S.C.C. No.
52-82-99; Anaheim Political Action Committee vs. City of Anaheim,
O.C.S.G.C. No. 58-25-68.
b. To discuss labor relations matters
54957.6.
Government Code Section
c. To discuss personnel matters - Government Code Section 54957.
d. To confer with its Attorney regarding potential litigation
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1).
e. To meet with its negotiator reardtng possible acquisition of land
from the Phoenix Club located at 1566 Douglass Road, Anaheim,
California.
f. To consider such other matters as are orally announced by the
City Attorney, City Manager or City Council prior to such recess
unless the motion to recess indicates any of the matters will not be
considered in Closed Session.
AFTER RECESS; The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present with the exception of Councilman Pickler, and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting. (1:37 p.m.)
INVOCATION; Dr. Ernest Furness, Anaheim Adventist Church, gave the invocation.
628
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES
June 27, 1989, 1:30 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Fred Hunter led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
119~ DECLARATION OF COMMENDATION: A Declaration of Commendation was
unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to Mr. Johnny Grant,
radio personality, celebrity interviewer and executive producer of the
Hollywood Christmas Parade, commending him for his community work and his many
charitable activities. Gene Autry, Chairman of the Board of the California
Angels also named Mr. Grant coordinator of the 1989 National/American League
Baseball All-Star Game to be held at Anaheim Stadium on July 11, 1989 and
other related events to be held in the City leading up to the Game.
Mayor Hunter and each Council Member personally greeted and commended Mr.
Grant who then gave a presentation on all of the activities scheduled prior to
and including the All-Star Game.
119: DECLARATIONS OF APPRECIATIONS; Declarations of Appreciations were
unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to the following City
employees extending appreciation for their years of dedicated service to the
City and with best wishes for a happy retirement:
Robert C. Shtveley, Utilities Electrical - 31 years of City service.
David A. Sommers, Recreation Services Manager, 28 years of City
service.
Harry G. Thompson, Police Department, 25 years of City service.
Mayor Hunter and Council Members extended their personal appreciation to these
employees on behalf of the citizens of Anaheim.
119; DECLARATION OF WELCOME; A Declaration of Welcome was unanimously
adopted by the City Council to be presented to the International Order of
3oh's Daughters Grand Bethel of California at the opening ceremony of their
annual meeting and also commending them on their community service work.
119: PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Hunter and
authorized by the City Council:
Respect for Law Week in Anaheim, July 9-15, 1989.
MINUTES; Approval of the minutes was deferred to the next regular meeting.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $3,482,000.52, in
accordance with the 1988-89 Budget, were approved.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS; The titles of the following resolutions on
the Consent Calendar were read by the City Manager. (Resolution Nos. 89R-262
through 89R-279, both inclusive, for adoption and Ordinance No. 5036 for
adoption)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions and
ordinance. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
629
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Hunter,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar. Councilman Hunter
offered Resolution Nos. 89R-262 through 89R-279, both inclusive, for adoption;
and Ordinance No. 5036 for adoption. Refer to Resolution/Ordinance Book.
Al. 105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Community Services Board
meeting held May 11, 1989.
105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Public Utilities Board meeting held
June 1, 1989.
105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Community Redevelopment Commission
meeting held 3une 7, 1989.
156: Receiving and filing the Anaheim Police Department Crime and Clearance
Analysis for the month of May 1989.
A2. 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-262; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1977-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO 3UNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1404).
(Levying an assessment of $34.54 on each lot and parcel of land contained in
Street Lighting Maintenance District 1977-1.)
A3, 104; RESOLUTION NO, 89R-263; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-2 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1859).
(Levying an assessment of $32.61 on each lot and parcel of land contained in
Street Lighting Maintenance District 1980-2.)
A4. 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-264; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-3 FOR THE GONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1097).
(Levying an assessment of $88.98 on each lot and parcel of land contained in
Street Lighting Maintenance District 1980-3.)
AS. 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-~65; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-4 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1392).
(Levying an assessment of $22.89 on each lot and parcel of land contained in
Street Lighting Maintenance District 1980-4.)
630
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M.
A6, 104; RESOLUTION NO, 89R-266: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-7 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 2875).
(Levying an assessment of $40.36 on each lot and parcel of land contained in
Street Lighting Maintenance District 1980-7.)
A7, 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-267: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 1516 AND
1653). (Levying an assessment of $39.47 on each lot and parcel of land
contained in Street Lighting Maintenance District 1981-1.)
A8, 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-268; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED.
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-5 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 2090).
(Levying an assessment of $28.62 on each lot and parcel of land contained in
Street Lighting Maintenance District 1981-5.)
A9. 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-269; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-6 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 2228 AND
2705). (Levying an assessment of $35.01 on each lot and parcel of land
contained in Street Lighting Maintenance District 1981-6.)
Al0. 104; RESOLUTION NO, 89R-270: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1982-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 1326 AND
1563). (Levying an assessment o£ 923.4G on each lot and parcel of land
contained in Street Lighting Maintenance District 1982-1.)
All. 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-271; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1984-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT NOS. 1453,
1401, 1400, 1375, 335 AND 217). (Levying an assessment of $20.23 on each lot
and parcel of land contained in Street Lighting Maintenance District 1984-1.)
Al2. 104: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-272; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINE~
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1985-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
631
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M,
1989 TO JUNE 30, 1990, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT NOS. 1647, 3278
AND 3301). (Levying an assessment of $34.53 on each lot and parcel of land
contained in Street Lighting Maintenance District 1985-1.)
Al3. 144: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-273; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING REQUALIFICATION FOR CITY ARTERIAL HIGHWAY FINANCING
PROGRAM ELIGIBILITY.
Al4. 164: Awarding the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder,
Vicco Construction Company, Inc., in the amount of $298,156 for Ball Road
Storm Drain Improvement - Sherman Street to East Street.
Al5. 169: Awarding the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder,
Sully-Miller Contracting Company, in the amount of $1,408,343.47 for Ball Road
Street Improvements - Gilbert Street to 1195' west to Knott Street.
Al6. 164: Awarding the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder,
Andrew Papac and Sons, in the amount of $509,834 for Vermont Avenue Storm
Drain Improvement Dakota Street to Anaheim Boulevard.
Al7. 164: Awarding the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder, S.
A. Healy Company, in the amount of $2,964,812 for Gilbert - Cerritos Storm
Drain Improvement.
Al8. 144/167: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-274; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE ORANGE COUNTY TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION TO
ALLOCATE ORANGE COUNTY UNIFIED TRANSPORTATION TRUST (OCUTT) FUNDS FOR THE
KATELLA AVENUE SIGNAL COORDINATION PROJECT. (Funds in the amount of
$1,634,065 for the Katella Avenue Traffic Signal Coordination Project)
Al9. 160: Accepting the bid of Orange Coast Ford Tractor, Inc., in the amount
of $59,911.20 for one tractor-mounted articulated boom mower, in accordance
with bid proposal #4699.
A20. 160: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent to
issue a purchase order, without sealed bidding, to OCE' Business Systems, in
the amount of $37,380 (plus tax and copy costs) for a copter to be located in
the Police Department, Detective Division, for a period of 60 months beginning
July 1, 1989.
A21. 160: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent to
issue a purchase order to Wang Laboratories, in an amount not to exceed
$164,000 to cover maintenance contract costs for all Wang equipment City-wide.
A22. 123/152: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Data Processing
Director to enter into a Government Purchase Agreement with Apple Gomputer,
Inc., for a minimum amount of $100,000 and a maximum of $399,999 for computer'
equipment as required for a period of one year beginning July 1, 1989.
632
City Hall. Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M,
123/160: Authorizing the Purchasing Agent to issue a blanket purchase order
to Apple Computer, Inc., pursuant to the Government Purchase Agreement.
A23. 160/123: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent
to issue a lease/rental purchase order without sealed bidding to University
Copy Systems, in the amount of $24,432 (plus tax and copy costs) for one Canon
Model NP6650 copier for a period of four years beginning July 1, 1989, to be
used in the Community Development Department.
A24. 123: Approving a First Amendment to Agreement with West Computil
Corporation, to provide a parking citation management system for processing
and collection of bail fines and assessments related to parking citations, in
accordance with bid proposal ~4575.
A25. 123/160: Approving a First Amendment to Agreement with Norco Delivery
Service, Inc., at a monthly cost of $2,503.50 to provide additional City mail
delivery service for the period beginning August 1, 1989 and extending the
agreement until July 31, 1990, in accordance with bid proposal #4491.
A26. 123/160: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent
to issue a purchase order without competitive bidding to Planning Research
Corporation, in the amount of $49,495 (including tax and freight) for one
VAX8350 upgrade processor for the Police Department Computer Aided Dispatch &
Records Management System.
A27. 160: Accepting the low bid of McMahan Desk, Inc., in an amount not to
exceed $50,000 for obtaining Harper office furniture as required during
FY89/90 in accordance with bid proposal #4711.
A28. 128: Receiving and filing the Monthly Financial Analysis presented by
the Director of Finance for ten months ended April 30, 1989.
A29. 128: Approving the 1988/89 write-off of uncollectible miscellaneous
accounts receivable totalling $479,419.
A30. 175.123: Approving an agreement with National Weather Service (NWS) to
provide NWS access to the weather station at Ltnda Vista Reservoir, 411 N.
Tu~tin, for periodic compliance cheek~.
A31. 170.123: Approving an assignment of interest in the Reimbursement
Agreements dated January 13, 1987 and March 10, 1987 with Boulevard
Development, Inc., to assign its rights to Municicorp of California. (Tracts
10969 and 10970 in Anaheim Hills).
A32. 175.123: Approving a Second Amendment to Agreement with Earl W. Gust, at
the rate of $42 per hour for an additional 1,000 hours for technical and
training services in the Public Utilities Department.
A33. 175: Approving the 1988/89 write-off of uncollectible utility accounts
totalling $726,761.43 as recommended by the Public Utilities Board at their
meeting of June 15, 1989.
633
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1:30 P.M,
A34. 175.123: Approving Anaheim's continued participation in the
California-Oregon Transmission Project (COTP) by approving Amendment No. 2 to
the Project Development Agreement at an additional cost of $104,503 for
Project Development Work; and authorizing the Public Utilities General Manager
to execute the final documents.
A35. 175: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-275; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE PREPARATION, EXECUTION, SALE AND DELIVERY OF
NOT TO EXCEED $46,000,000 AGGREGATE PRINCIPAL AMOUNT OF CERTIFICATES OF
PARTICIPATION, APPROVING A TRUST AGREEMENT, INSTALLMENT PURCHASE AGREEMENT,
PURCHASE CONTRACT AND DRAFT OFFICIAL STATEMENT AND CERTAIN ACTIONS IN
CONNECTION THEREWITH. (And authorizing the Public Utilities General Manager,
or in his absence the Assistant General Manager - Finance and Administration,
to take the necessary actions to complete the issuance of the Electric System
1989 Certificates of Participation)
A36. 123: Approving an Affordable Housing Agreement with Mobmmmad Kiafar and
Parvin Kiafar for two affordable two-bedroom units (out of 14 units) on
property located at the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Anna Drive
(Variance No. 3782).
Councilwoman Kaywood. She asked relative to this agreement and the next to be
considered rather than a 30-year affordable project, if the affordable aspect
could be for the life of the project.
Bertha Chavoya, Housing Programs Manager. Staff will look into the matter and
seek legal counsel advise. It will not affect this and the next agreement but
possibly future projects.
A37. 123: Approving an Affordable Housing Agreement with Gilbert Park
Partnership for six affordable one-bedroom units for very Iow income persons
and two one-bedroom units for iow income persons (out of 24 units) on property
located at 925 South Gilbert Street (Conditional Use Permit No. 3099).
A38, 153; RESOLUTION NO, 89R-276; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88R-166, PERSONNEL RULE 19,
BEREAVEMENT LEAVE. (Bereavement Leave by adding daughter-in-law and
son-in-law to the definition of other family members.)
A39. 153: RESOLUTION NO, 89R-277; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TWO LETTERS OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION PERTAINING TO
BEREAVEMENT LEAVE. (Dated December 9, 1987 - Articles 33 and 34.)
A40. 123: Approving an agreement with Magnolia Elementary School District to
provide Park Ranger patrols of school facilities from June 30, 1989 through
September 3, 1989.
A41. 124: Approving the 1988/89 write-off of uncollectible tenant accounts
receivable totaling $68,472.47 (Anaheim Convention Center).
634
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES
June 27, 1989, 1:30 P.M.
A42. 123: Approving a grant agreement with the Orange County Job Training
Partnership Agency in the amount of $442,931 for the period of April 1, 1989
to September 30, 1989, to provide funds for the Summer Youth Employment
Program, and authorizing the City Manager to execute said agreement and
modifications.
A43. 123: Approving an agreement with Golden West Baseball Company for the
1989 Major League Baseball All Star Game and Work Out Day at Anaheim Stadium,
and authorizing the Mayor to sign on behalf of the City.
A44. 123: Approving an agreement with Anaheim Bulletin for the furnishing of
all legal advertising at a rate of $5.50 per column inch for the year
beginning July 1, 1989, and ending June 30, 1990.
A45. 123: Approving an agreement with the County of Orange Probation
Department to provide the City with work crews at a cost of $250 per work crew
day for grounds cleanup and weed eradication.
A46, 152/118; RESOLUTION NO, 89R-278; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 88R-399 IN CONNECTION WITH PERSONS
AUTHORIZED TO ACT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN SMALL CLAIMS ACTIONS.
(And authorizing the City Treasurer, Finance Director, Administrative Services
Director, and Assistant Finance Director to represent the City.)
A47, 158; RESOLUTION NO, 89R-279; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES OR INTERESTS THEREIN.
A48. 123: Approving a five year Lease/Sublease Agreement with Magnolia
Elementary School District and Los Angeles Rams Football Company, in the
amount of $120,000 a year, for lease of the Jultette Low Elementary School,
contingent upon execution of said lease by the School District, and with minor
modifications as may be approved by the City Manager.
A49. 149/142: ORDINANCE NO, 5036 - ADOPTION; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ADDING A NEW SUBSECTION .2400 TO SECTION 14.32.190 OF CHAPTER 14.32 OF
TITLE 14 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING AND STOPPING. (On
La Palma Avenue, the north side, from Citron Street to a point 840 feet east
of Citron Street.)
A50. This item was pulled from the Consent Calendar for further discussion.
(See end of Consent Calendar.)
A51. 123: Approving an agreement with the County of Orange at an estimated
cost of $498,365 for Animal Control and Shelter Services, effective July 1,
1989 through June 30, 1990.
A52. 160/123: Accepting the low bid and approving an agreement with West
Coast Utility Company in the amount of $437,965.20 for a two year
lease/purchase for three conventional cab trucks with aerial devices and
appurtenances for Utilities Field Operations, all in accordance with bid
proposal #4652 as publicly advertised.
635
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1;30
A53. 123: Approving an agreement with Anaheim Area Visitor & Convention
Bureau which allows for the construction of additional office space for the
Bureau, to be provided as a part of the modernization program.
A54. 119/106: Accepting a check in the amount of $10,000 from Larry Lea
Ministries, and placing this amount in the Council Contingency Fund.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 89R-262 through 89R-279:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 89R-262 through 89R-279, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
End of Consent Calendar. MOTION CARRIED.
A50, 153; APPOINTMENTS AND PROMOTIONS - AMENDING PERSONNEL RULE 7;
Submitted was report dated 3une 13, 1989 from David Morgan, Human Resources
Director, recommending amendment to Personnel Rule 7 as outlined in his report
and a proposed resolution adopting same which would amend Resolution No.
88R-166. A presentation was made by Sharon Erickson, President, Anaheim
Municipal Employees Association (AMEA) requesting that the proposed resolution
not be adopted or at least action postponed until employee groups could meet
with the Human Resources Director and noting that a representative of the
International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers (IBEW) was not able to be
present at the meeting of June 20, 1989. The Council subsequently approved a
motion to continue this item to this date to give an opportunity for a
representative of the IBEW to address the Council.
Bill Villalobos, IBEW. IBEW supports the AMEA position as Mrs. Ertckson
explained on June 20, 1989. Their concern is that the City, City Management
and the Council make a commitment to employees, especially dedicated
employees. They realize it is in the best interest of the City to hire
qualified employees especially in management ranks. Career employees are
needed. Most people hired by the City intend to make a career in the City.
Career employees want and need opportunities for advancement. The kind of
commitment necessary is that there will Be opportunities for advancement,
growth and opportunities to be trained and to learn in order to be qualified.
He and Mrs. Erickson met with Human Resources Director, Dave Morgan and
expressed their concerns. Mr. Morgan stressed his willingness to work with
the unions and associations in developing educational and training programs -
opportunities for employees to become involved to better qualify themselves.
The direction they need from the City Council is that there is commitment to
qualify current and future City employees for advancement within the City and
to give some consideration to that qualification and years of service.
Mayor Hunter. The Council is committed to hire from within not just for
management positions. He appreciates the time Mr. Morgan has taken to meet
with Mrs. Ertckson and Mr. Villalobos towards working for entry level
636
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27. 1989, 1;30 P,M,
management training and hiring from within. That is the policy and the
Council is committed to that policy.
Dave Morgan, Human Resources Director. Making statements about commitment is
easy, but funding commitment is what is difficult. The record should show
that this Council, with the last adoption of the budget, has approved funds
for training and development in excess of what has been committed in previous
years and that is important to note.
Councilwoman Kaywood. She asked if the proposed resolution was not simply
putting in writing a past practice for the last 25 years; Mr. Morgan answered
that is correct. It is to clarify the ability to do that.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION; The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 89R-280)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 89R-280 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-280: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING PERSONNEL RULE 7 PERTAINING TO APPOINTMENTS AND PROMOTIONS AS
ESTABLISHED IN RESOLUTION NO. 88R-166.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-280 duly passed and adopted.
160; CHANGE ORDER - TANK PROTECTION - SITE INVESTIGATION AT UTILITy SERVICE
CENTER; Submitted was report dated June 27, 1989 from the Purchasing
Division, recommending that the Council authorize the Purchasing Agent to
issue a change order in an amount not to exceed $15,000 for equipment and
personnel required for site investigation on the contaminated soil at the
Utility Service Center.
City Attorney White explained that in order for the Council to act on the
subject, it is necessary to waive the 72-hour posting provision of the Brown
Act.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, the Anaheim
City Council determined that the need to act on the following item arose after
the posting of the agenda for this meeting, on Friday, June 23, 1989, at
3:35 p.m.; and consequently waived the Brown Act requirement relative to
posting the item on the printed agenda. Councilman Pickler was absent.
MOTION CARRIED.
637
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M.
MOTION; Councilman Hunter moved to authorize the Purchasing Agent to issue a
change order in an amount not to exceed $15,000 for equipment and personnel
required for site investigation on the contaminated soil at the Utility
Service Center, as outlined in staff report dated June 27, 1989. Councilman
Daly seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CAi~RIED.
153: MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING - ANAHEIM POLICE ASSOCIATION: Approving the
Memorandum of Understanding, establishing the terms and conditions represented
by the Anaheim Police Association effective July 7, 1989.
City Attorney White explained that in order for the Gouncil to act on the
subject, it is necessary to waive the 72-hour posting provision of the Brown
Act.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the Anaheim
City Council determined that the need to act on the following item arose after
the posting of the agenda for this meeting, on Friday, June 23, 1989, at
3:35 p.m.; and consequently waived the Brown Act requirement relative to
posting the item on the printed agenda. Councilman Pickler was absent.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Ehrle offered Resolution No. 89R-281 for adoption, approving the
Memorandum of Understanding, establishing the terms and conditions represented
by the Anaheim Police Association effective July 7, 1989. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 89R-281: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ESTABLISHING TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF EMPLOYMENT FOR EMPLOYEES IN CLASSIFICATIONS ASSIGNED TO THE
PEACE OFFICERS UNIT REPRESENTED BY THE ANAHEIM POLICE ASSOCICATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-281 duly passed and adopted.
179: ITEMS Bi - B7 FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 5, 1989;
INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS JUNE 27, 1989;
Bi.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3158 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: FULLERTON MOTOR PARTS CO., 140 W. Commonwealth Avenue,
Fullerton, CA 92632
AGENT: SHOOK BUILDING SYSTEMS INC., 2055 S. Baker Avenue, Ontario,
CA 91761
LOCATION: 120 W. South Street
To permit an automotive maintenance building.
CUP NO. 3158 WITHDRAWN by the applicant.
638
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M,
B2.
VARIANCE NO 3945, CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 1]:
OWNERS: WILLIAM A. ERICKSON AND LEIDA C. ERICKSON, 205 Owens Drive,
Anaheim, CA 92808
LOCATION; 205 Owens Drive
PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED: To retain one 25-foot high
(retracted) to 70-foot high (expanded) ham radio tower with waiver of
prohibited ground-mounted equipment.
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Variance No. 3945 GRANTED by the Planning Commission subject to
revised plans requiring the tower to be enclosed on 3 sides in cedar
clad structure and on the fourth side by a garage stucco wall to 20
feet with 3'3" of the tower and the 10 ft mast and antenna visible
above the enclosure when the tower is retracted; further subject to
completion of landscaping on slope within four months and slope being
permanently maintained.
(PC89-152, 7 yes, 0 no)
Approved CEQA Categorical Exemption, Class 11.
B3, RECLASSIFICATION NO, 88-89-53, VARIANCE NO, 3941 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION
REOUEST FOR INTERPRETATION OF ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO ELEVATORS;
OWNER: RODRIGUEZ, JONES & COMPANY, INC., 2045 S. Haster Avenue,
Suite 10, Anaheim, CA 92802
LOCATION: Property is approximately 2,83 acres bounded by Santa Aha
Street. Helena Street, Elm Street and Clementtne Street.
PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED: Applicant's request is for a change
in zone from RM-2400 to RM-1200; and to construct a 102-unit
"affordable" apartment complex (originally advertised as 120 units)
with waivers of (a) maximum structural height, (b) minimum site area
per dwelling unit, (c) minimum structural setback and (d) maximum lot
coverage.
Petitioner requests interpretation of Code Section 18.32.070
pertaining to elevator requirements.
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Reclassification No. 88-89-53 GRANTED to the RM-1200 zone. (PC89-153,
6 yes, 1 abstain).
Variance No. 3941 GRANTED with revised plans and no "affordable
units"; minimum 4 ft high berm; security of garage area to be
approved by City Traffic Engineer; handicapped parking spaces to be
relocated inside security gates, and waivers:
a. minimum site area per dwelling unit - deleted
b. maximum structural height approved
c. maximum site coverage approved
d. minimum structural setback approved
(PC89-154, 6 yes, 1 abstain)
Additionally Planning Commission interpreted Code regarding elevator
and made finding the project to be considered two stories rather than
three.(PC89-155, 6 yes, 1 abstain).
Approved Negative Declaration.
639
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M,
B4.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 256 CIRCULATION ELEMENT
AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: CITY OF ANAHEIM, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92803
City initiated amendment to the Circulation Element of the General
Plan to consider redesignatton of Center Street (from Lincoln Avenue
to State College Boulevard) and Glementtne Street (from Broadway to
Lincoln Avenue) from the designation of Secondary Arterial Highway to
local streets; Crescent Way (from Lincoln Avenue to Crescent Avenue)
from the designation of a commuter street to a local street; and Via
Cortez (from Santa Aha Canyon Road to Route 91) from the designation
of Hillside Secondary Arterial Highway to a local street.
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
GPA NO. 256 APPROVED by the Planning Commission without change.
(PC89-156, 7 yes, 0 no).
Approved Negative Declaration.
Public hearing date to be set on General Plan Amendment No. 256.
B5.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3166 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: VANDERBILT, LTD., 27401 Los Altos, Suite 400, Mission Viejo,
CA 92691
AGENT: STEVE DUNBAR, 20429 Yorba Ltnda Boulevard, Yorba Linda, CA
92686
LOCATION; 8285-95 Santa Aha Canyon Road
PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED: To permit an animal hospital.
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
CUP NO. 3166 GRANTED by the Planning Commission without changes
(PC89-157, 6 yes, 1 abstain).
Approved Negative Declaration.
B6. WAIVER OF CODE REOUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3165 AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION:
OWNER: ANAHEIM LAND ASSOCIATES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, A DELAWARE
LIMITED PARTNERSHIP, 450 New-port Center Drive, Suite 304, New-port
Beach, GA 92660
LOCATION: 2430 E. Katella Avenue
PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED: To permit a commercial retail center
and on-sale alcoholic beverages in two proposed freestanding
restaurants with waiver of required site screening.
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
CUP NO. 3165 GRANTED by the Planning Commission with a minimum 3-foot
high berm on Katella Avenue with waiver:
a. required site screening - approved Waiver of code
requirement APPROVED.
(PC89-158, 7 yes, 0 no)
Approved Negative Declaration.
640
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M.
B7. RECLASSIFICATION NO, 88-89-55, VARIANCE NO, 3944 (WITHDRAWAL REQUESTED)
WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3168 AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION;
OWNER: DONALD HUNT, 12844 Inglewood Avenue, Hawthorne, CA 90250
AGENT: WILLIAM PEARCE, 12844 Inglewood Avenue, Hawthorne, CA 90250
LOCATION: 400 West Wilken Way
PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY PROPOSED: For a change in zone from CG to
RM-2400 or a less intense zone, and to establish a 1-lot 106-unit
condominium subdivision with waivers of (a) minimum number of parking
spaces, (b) handicapped access and (c) minimum recreational-leisure
area.
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION:
Reclassification No. 88-89-55 GRANTED by the Planning Commission to
the RM-2400 or less intense zone.
(PC89-159, 7 yes, 0 no)
Variance No. 3944 Withdrawn by the applicant.
Waiver of code requirement DENIED.
CUP NO. 3168 GRANTED, IN PART with waivers as follow:
a. minimum number of parking spaces denied
b. handicapped access denied
c. minimum recreational-leisure area deleted
(PC89-160, 7 yes, 0 no)
Approved Negative Declaration.
A review of the Planning Commission's decision on the foregoing was requested
be Council Members Kaywood and Pickler (see minutes of June 13, 1989 - Re:
Tentative Tract 13997) and, therefore, a public hearing was set for Tuesday,
August 1, 1989 at 6:00 p.m. to be heard in conjunction with Tentative Tract
13997 which was previously set for a public hearing.
End of Planning Commission Items from June 5, 1989.
179; REQUEST TO RESCHEDULE PUBLIC HEARINGS ON VARIANCE NO, 3938 AND GRADING
PLAN NO, 1336; Request submitted by Floyd Farano, Farano & Kieviet, to
reschedule the subject public hearings to July 18, 1989 instead of August 1,
1989.
City Clerk Sohl announced that letter dated June 22, 1989 had been received by
Floyd Farano, Farano & Kteviet, stating he would not be available on Tuesday,
August 1, 1989, the date on which public hearings were set on the subject
Variance and Grading Plan. He is requesting instead, that the hearings be
held on Tuesday, July 18, 1989 which is a night meeting. Residents preferred
that the matter be heard at a night hearing. At this point, there would still
be sufficient time to advertise for July 18, 1989.
Councilman Hunter moved to set the public hearing date on Variance No. 3938
and Grading Plan No. 1336 for Tuesday, July 18, 1989 at 6:00 p.m. as requested
by Mr. Farano. Councilman Daly seconded the motion.
641
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, %989, 1;30 P,M,
Before a vote was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood noted the letter of protest
received from a neighbor representing the residents stating that August 1,
1989 remains their preferred date for the public hearing. She was also
concerned that it is likely there will not be a full Council present on
July 18, 1989.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion to reschedule the date of the
subject public hearings to Tuesday, July 18, 1989 at 6:00 p.m. Councilwoman
Kaywood voted no. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
179: PLANNING COMMISSION AND ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ITEMS - JUNE 19 AND
JUNE 20, 1989 MEETINGS; City Clerk Sohl announced that due to the fact that
City Council meetings of July 4 and July 11, 1989 have previously been
cancelled, supplementary agendas have been prepared and submitted to the City
Council containing the actions of the Planning Commission at their meeting of
June 19, 1989 and the decisions of the Zoning Administrator from June 20, 1989.
These supplementary agendas will be posted and are available to the public on
request from the City Clerk's Office.
The appeal period for items on the June 19, 1989 Planning Commission agenda
will end on 5:00 p.m. Tuesday, July 11, 1989.
The appeal period for items with a June 20, 1989 Zoning Administrator decision
date will end 5:00 p.m. Wednesday, July 5, 1989.
The City Clerk also announced that if Council Members wish 'to set any item for
a public hearing a form will be prepared and available in her Office to be
signed by two Council Members and submitted up to the end of the appeal period.
179/142; ORDINANCE NO, 5037 - MAXIMUM PERMITTED STRUCTURAL HEIGHT OF
SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES IN THE SCENIC CORRIDOR; Amending various sections of
various chapters of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to maximum
permitted structural height of single-family residences in the Scenic Corridor
Overlay zone. This matter was discussed at and continued from the meetings of
May 23 and June 6, 1989. At the meeting of June 6, 1989, it was continued to
June 20, 1989 where a brief Council discussion took place and the ordinance
was subsequently offered for first readtn§ by Mayor Hunter but deletln~ lots
fronting on the north side of Aventda de Santiago (see minutes that date).
Mayor Hunter asked for public input on the proposed ordinance.
Mitzy Ozaki. She referred to the staff report of September 1, 1988, page 3
which discussed issues and goals relating to the subject. Mrs. Ozaki
submitted a data sheet listing five issues and goals (left side of sheet) with
her comments to each to the right (made a part of the record) which she
briefed. Relative to her second comment regarding the issue of whether or not
the Code is clear and consistent with regard to the height standard, she
favors the City Attorney's proposed definition of maximum structural height
(see his memo of May 24, 1989) since currently she feels there is a disturbing
trend in the Canyon Area where grading is taking place building pads up above
642
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M.
the natural grade, thereby obliterating views of existing homes. She
submitted seven photos (numbered 1 through 7) which showed the negative effect
to surrounding property owners as a result of pad buildup (photos made a part
of the record). In concluding, she asked that the maximum structural height
remain at 25 feet and be without encroachments of any kind. It is not
necessary to change the entire Code to accommodate the few exceptions.
Floyd Farano, Farano & Kievtet, representing Mr. and Mrs. Gerald D. Barnes,
7051 Avenida de Santiago. He is present to address the material on Page 6
that was removed from the proposed ordinance, Section .0204 relative to the
maximum height of any building in Hidden Canyon including Avenida de
Santiago. When the ordinance was offered for first reading last week, that
portion was eliminated thereby deleting the lots fronting on the north side of
Avenida de Santiago. The reason they are requesting that the Council include
the north side of Avenida de Santiago thereby allowing the 35-foot height is,
in his opinion after having reviewed the physical characteristics of the area,
they are such that allowing a 35-foot height limit would not impede the site
line, characteristics, or view of the area. There are 13 lots on the north
side and 12 have been fully developed. One is remaining, Lot 17, which is
owned by his client. The 12 structures that have been constructed and that
are in various stages of completion have had 7 height variances granted from
29 feet 10 inches for the house to 31 feet 10 inches for a chimney. The
remaining panhandle lot is 3.8 acres and can handle a large house.
Mr. Farano then narrated a video presentation which he explained more clearly
depicts the geographic and true topographic nature of the area, concluding
that the inclusion of residences on the north side of Avenida de Santiago in
the ordinance will not make a difference. He is asking that the Council
reinsert into the ordinance the houses in Hidden Canyon Estates fronting the
north side of Avenida de Santiago because, as his presentation has shown, his
client's house will be the only one affected by the ordinance and it would not
be harmful to the community at large if that portion of the ordinance under
Section .0204 was reinserted.
From the audience, Mitzy Ozaki stated this is not the time Mr. Farano should
be addressing the issue because the people involved do not have the
opportunity to be present to respond.
Phyllis Duncan, 7625 Pleasant Place (Mohler Drive area). She feels Mr. Farano
is out of order. He (Farano) is pleading a case under the cover of the
overall action that is before the Council today when the people who are in
opposition are not present. That public hearing is to take place at a later
date. She also referred to her letter of June 21, 1989 which the Council has
received (previously made a part of the record), the contents of which she
would like to re-emphasize at this time. Her main concern is remodeling and
the impact such remodeling will have. If remodeling takes place under the new
ordinance, with the extra 5 feet, there is nothing to protect the residents
and they will have no recourse. In finality, she is urging the Council to
retain the 25-foot height maximum in the Scenic Corridor.
643
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27. 1989, 1;30 P,M,
Roland Krueger, 561 Peralta Hills Drive. He is lending support to what Mrs.
Ozaki has said. He agrees philosophically that the area would be best served
and maintained under the present Scenic Corridor standard. If the Council
decides to approve the ordinance, he believes it would be in order to make an
exception for both the Mohler Drive and Peralta Hills area because it would be
consistent with the Council resolution adopted in 1970 committing to
preserving those areas. Like Mohler Drive, Peralta Hills is over 90%
developed and developed within the current Scenic Corridor standards. The
25-foot height limit has been the cornerstone of the standards all these
years. The proposed relaxed standards would not be in keeping with the
current homes. If the ordinance is adopted, the hidden danger to both Peralta
Hills and Mohler Drive, even if those areas are exempted, it does allow
remodeling to the new standards and the results could change the existing
character of those areas. For those who feel they have to exceed the 25-foot
height, the proposal has made an exemption in the Hidden Canyon Area and
already there is a previous exemption for Peralta Hills East. There are areas
where people can build taller homes. He also pointed out that Peralta Hills
East is not Peralta Hills Estates. Peralta Hills Estates has different zoning
and is developing with a completely different character. A point the Anaheim
Hills Citizens Coalition has made before, if the proposed ordinance will
remove a resident's right to appeal a departure from the development
standards, there should be some wording to require a public hearing if the
allowed encroachment under the new ordinance over 25 feet adversely impacts
the view from the adjoining property.
Diane Wilkins, 1070 South Armstrong Circle. Addressing Mr. Farano's concern,
basically they understood that Hidden Canyon was allowed to have a higher
height. The homes along the ridge line are extremely visible to the entire
Hills Area. They do not feel that the homes along the ridge line deserve to
be in the Hidden Canyon Area as they are not hidden from the rest of the area.
Ralph Krumes, 236 Owens Drive. He is speaking on behalf of the proposed
ordinance. He noted from the staff report that since 1986 Anaheim has had
31 requests for variances wherein in 33 surrounding communities, over one-half
had no requests, some had one and some two which points to the fact that there
is a problem relative to height in Anaheim. The new ordinance now treats the
heights of houses even more severely. He then elaborated on certain portions
o£ the new proposed ordinance. Anaheim it one of the mogt restrictive ettte~
in the area. Surrounding communities are drawing up much better height
ordinances in terms of allowing estate-like homes. He then submitted a
photograph of a home in Villa Park (made a part of the record) which could not
be built in the Anaheim Hills area under the new ordinance. The ordinance
would not allow for the type of architecture as shown in the photo. He has
heard that many people feel it is the majority of the opinion of the people in
the area that they want to retain the 25-foot limit. Because of that, he has
undertaken a survey and prepared a petition from his neighbors. He lives in
the Owens Drtve-Danielle Circle area. Two of the residents were on extended
vacation but 100% of the remaining residents have signed the petition opposing
the 25-foot height limit. Several people just as he were "tricked" into
signing a previous petition circulated which they did not know was as
restrictive as it turned out to be. His petition states that the residents
644
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M.
are, "requesting that they be afforded the same privileges as those in the
Hidden Canyon Area and be excluded from the ordinance." They do not wish to
be part of it and hope that some kind of compromise can be reached.
Mayor Hunter then concluded public input.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCE; The title of the following ordinance was read
by the City Clerk. (Ordinance No. 5037)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinance.
Councilman Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Ordinance No. 5037 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance
Book.
ORDINANCE NO, 5037; AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING VARIOUS
SECTIONS OF VARIOUS CHAPTERS OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ZONING.
Before a vote was taken, Councilman Ehrle stated he was going to support the
proposed ordinance but looking at the staff report, there will be an
opportunity for people to apply for variances. It is an ordinance that is a
little less restrictive and gives staff a clearer definition of where height
is to be measured from. He does not think it is perfect and would prefer to
see the height limitation at 30 feet. Those people who are going to be
building in and around Hidden Canyon and Peralta Hills Estates and the Mohler
area can come before the Council and if extenuating circumstances exist, he
will vote in favor of a home that adds to the community. He is supporting the
ordinance but with reservations.
Councilwoman Kaywood. She needs to clarify whether the Mohler area and
Peralta Hills are restricted to 25 feet.
Joel Fick, Planning Director. The ordinance would apply to the entire Scenic
Corridor area with the exception of those areas that are excluded as noted in
the ordinance.
City Attorney White clarified for Councilwoman Kaywood that the ordinance
before the Council is the one where lots fronting on the north side of Avenida
de Santiago were eliminated.
Councilwoman Kaywood. Her preference would be to adhere to 25 feet other than
hidden Canyon Estates without parapets, cupolas, etc. It is important not to
break faith with the residents who were promised a rural area in perpetuity,
not new Council by new Council. She hopes that the area will remain the
magnificent area that it is.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing ordinance.
645
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M,
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter.
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 5037 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS; By general consent the Council recessed for ten minutes. (2:59 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS; The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (3:08 p.m.)
179: PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO, 88-89-32, VARIANCE NO, 3893 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION;
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Linda Lee Sprague
1305 1/2 W. North Street,
Anaheim, CA 92803
LOCATION/REQUEST: The property is located at 1305 and 1307 W. North Street.
The request is for a change in zone from RS-lO,000 to RM-3000, and for waivers
of (a) minimum building site area per dwelling unit, (b) maximum structural
height, (c) minimum structural setback and (d) minimum recreational/leisure
area to construct a 10-unit condominium complex.
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION; Reclassification No. 88-89-32
was granted by the Planning Commission, under Resolution No. PC89-123;
Variance No. 3893 was granted, in part, (waivers a and d denied) by the
Planning Commission, under Resolution No. PC89-124; approved EIR Negative
Declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilwoman
Kaywood and Councilman Daly at the meeting of May 23, 1989, and public hearing
scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 15, 1989.
Posting of property June 15, 1989.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 16, 1989.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 8, 1989.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Ltnda Lee Sprague, 1305 1/2 W. North Street, Anaheim, CA 92803.
She is the owner of the property. She referred to her letter of
June 21, 1989 requesting an 8-week continuance of the public
hearing to prepare revised sets of plans to mitigate, some of the
problems the neighbors have expressed to her. As stated in the
646
City Hall, Anaheim, California
COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27. 1989, 1;30 P.M.
letter, the neighbors have circumvented the developer and
presented their concerns directly to her. As a result, she has
released the developer as agents and will deal with the
neighbors directly.
Mayor Hunter asked of those present if anyone was opposed to the requested
continuance; there was no objection to the proposed continuance from those in
the Chamber audience who were present on the matter.
MOTION; Councilwoman Kaywood moved to continue the public hearing on
Reclassification No. 88-89-32, Variance No. 3893 and Negative Declaration to
Tuesday, August 22, 1989 at 3:00 p.m. Councilman Daly seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
President Hunter reconvened the special meeting of the Anaheim Public
Improvement Corporation for a joint meeting with the City Council. (3:09 p.m.)
186; JOINT PUBLIC HEARING CITY COUNCIL ~ ANAHEIM PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT
CORPORATION - TEFRA CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION (1989 RECYCLING EQUIPMENT
FINANCING PROJECT); To consider the issuance of certificates of participation
for the purpose of providing financing for the 1989 Recycling Equipment
Project and to hear public comments.
Submitted was report dated June 20, 1989 from the Finance Director, George
Ferrone, recommending certain actions with regard to the subject. Mr. Ferrone
expressed appreciation to Mr. William Taormtna for bringing the financing
opportunity to the City. The result as pointed out in his report indicated a
savings of $4.3 million to the City's rate payers. It was a pleasure to work
with Mr. Taormina.
Mayor/President Hunter asked if anyone wished to speak regarding the subject
Certificates of Participation; there being no response, he closed the public
hearing.
Board Member Hunter offered Resolution No. APIC89-2 for adoption, approving,
Authorizing and Directing Execution of Certain Installment Sale Financing
Documents; and authorizing and directing certain actions with respect
thereto. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. APIC89-2: A RESOLUTION APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
EXECUTION OF CERTAIN INSTALLMENT SALE FINANCING DOCUMENTS AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
BOARD MEMBERS:
BOARD MEMBERS:
BOARD MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The President declared Resolution No. APIC89-2 duly passed and adopted.
647
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M.
Board Member Hunter moved the following: (1) Approve an Installment Sale
Agreement relating to the financing of recycling equipment, with the City
(purchaser); (2) approve a Trust Agreement by and among the Corporation, the
City and First Interstate Bank of California (the Trustee) relating to the
financing and the execution and delivery of certificates of participation
evidencing undivided fractional interests of the owners thereof in installment
payments to be made by the City under the Installment Sale Agreement; (3)
approve an Assignment Agreement by and between the Corporation and the
Trustee, pursuant to which the Corporation will assign certain of its rights
under the Installment Sale Agreement, including its right to receive
installment payments thereunder, to the Trustee. Board Member Ehrle seconded
the motion. Board Member Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
COUNCIL ACTIONS:
WAIVER OF READING RESOLUTIONS; The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 89R-282 through 89R-284, both
inclusive)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution Nos. 89R-282 through 89R-284, both
inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 89R-282; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING THE EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF AN INSTALLMENT SALE AGREEMENT
FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR CERTAIN RECYCLING EQUIPMENT.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-283; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM PROVIDING PRELIMINARY APPROVAL OF EXECUTION AND DELIVERY OF
INSTALI.MENT SALE AGREEMENT FOR THE PURPOSE OF PROVIDING FINANCING FOR CERTAIN
RECYCLING EQUIPMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. 89R-284; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING, AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING EXECUTION OF CERTAIN INSTALI~MENT
OF SALE FINANCING DOCUMENTS, APPROVING THE FORM AND DISTRIBUTION OF A
PRELIMINARY OFFICIAL STATEMENT, AN OFFICIAL NOTICE OF SALE AND AN OFFICIAL BID
FORM IN CONNECTION WITH THE OFFERING AND SALE OF CERTIFICATES OF PARTICIPATION
RELATING THERETO, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT
THERETO.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 89R-282 through 89R-284, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
64.8
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27. 1989, 1;30 P,M,
Councilman Hunter moved to approve the following: (1) Approve an Agreement
for Rebate Calculation Services with Jones Hall Hill &White to provide
arbitrage calculation services to ensure that we abide by the federal tax law
requiring excess earnings be rebated back to the federal government; (2)
approve an Agreement employing Jones Hall Hill &White as Bond Counsel
regarding the sale of certificates of participation for the purpose of
financing the project at a fee for legal expenses of approximately $42,335,
plus out of pocket expenses not to exceed $7,500; (3) approve an agreement
with Seidler-Fitzgerald Public Finance as Financial Advisor to the City
regarding the sale of certificates of participation for the purpose of
financing the Project at a fee of $35,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses
not-to-exceed $2,500. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT; President Hunter moved to adjourn the special meeting of the
Anaheim Public Improvement Corporation. Board Member Ehrle seconded the
motion. Board Member Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (3:12 p.m.)
104; PUBLIC HEARING - REFORMATION OF STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO.
1977-1 (TRACT 1404);
LOCATION/REQUEST: The Proposed assessment district includes each parcel of
property abutting on Lenz Drive in Tract No. 1404 for the maintenance and
operation of seven street lights for a period of five years at an estimated
cost of $4,355.40. The assessment period begins July 1, 1989, as recommended
by the Superintendent of Streets.
This is the date and time set for a public hearing on the subject as
recommended by the Superintendent of Streets Public Works/Engineering
Department in memorandum dated May 24, 1989. Also submitted was report dated
June 27, 1989 from the Superintendent of Streets recommending that the Council
declare that there was not a majority protest against Street Lighting
Assessment District 1977-1 (Tract No. 1404) either written or oral.
Mayor Hunter asked if anyone wished to speak either in favor or in opposition
to the proposed reformation of Street Lighting Maintenance District 1977-1
(Tract No. 1404); there was no response.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION; The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 89R-285)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 89R-285 for adoption, relative to
Street Lighting Maintenance District 1977-1 (Tract No. 1404) declaring no
majority protest against the Assessment District. Refer to Resolution Book.
649
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1:30 P,M.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-285: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DECLARING THAT THERE WAS NOT A MAJORITY PROTEST AGAINST STREET
LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT NO. 1977-1 (TRACT NO. 1404).
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-285 duly passed and adopted.
179; YUBLIC HFARING - VARIANCE NO, 3908. CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT. CLASS 11;
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Carl Zaby
444 W. Katella Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92802
AGENT:
James Yowell
350 W. Katella Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92802
LOCATION/REQUEST: The property is located at 350 W. Katella Avenue. The
request is to waive (a) maximum number of freestanding signs, (b) minimum
distance between freestanding signs, (c) minimum distance of freestanding
signs to property lines to retain three existing freestanding signs.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Variance No. 3908 was granted by the Planning
Commission, for a period of two years, under Resolution No. PC89-128.
HEARING SET ON:
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilman
Pickler and Councilman Ehrle at the meeting of May 23, 1989, and public
hearing scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 15, 1989.
Posting of property June 15, 1989.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 16, 1989.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 8, 1989.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Tom Barker, 13291 Fairmont Way, Santa Aha, was present to answer
questions.
Councilman Ehrle.
His concern is relative to signage. The City is trying to clean
up the area and to ensure that signs conform to existing codes.
650
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27. 1989, 1;30 P.M,
Tom Barker.
There are three existing signs on the back side of the
property. They are not visible from the street and are not
intended to draw any business. When they took over the car wash
about 5 years ago, the signs were there and probably have been
there for 15 years. They have been working the Zabys, who own
the property, to end the lease in approximately 3 to 6 months.
He would like to be out of the property and the Zabys would like
it back. One stipulation is to demolish the car wash and they
are working on that right now. There will not be a carwash on
the property.
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Since the carwash is going to be demolished, it would make the
issue relative to signage moot.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN FAVOR: None.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN OPPOSITION:
None.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman
Hunter, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, it was determined that the proposed
project falls within the definition of Section 3.01 Class 11, of the City of
Anaheim guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and
is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR.
Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING RESOLUTION; The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 89R-286)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman ghrle seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 89R-286 for adoption, granting
Variance No. 3908, upholding the findings and decision of the City Planning
Commission. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-286; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 3908.
Roll Call Vote:
651
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES Jun~ 27, %989, 1;30 P,M,
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-286 duly passed and adopted.
179: PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 3927. CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT. CLASS 1;
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Eugene P. Noonan
126 Peralta Hills Drive,
~ahetm, CA 92807
LDCATION/REQUEST: The property is located at 126 Peralta Hills Drive. The
request is for waiver of maxim~ structural height to construct a second story
addition to an existing single-family residence.
ZONING ~)MINISTRATOR ACTION: Variance No. 3927 was denied by the Zoning
Administrator, under Decision No. ZA89-25.
HEARING SET ON:
A letter of appeal was submitted by the owner, Eugene P. Noonan, and public
hearing scheduled this date..
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 15, 1989.
Posting of property June 15, 1989.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 16., 1989.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Zoning Administrator dated May 4, 1989.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Eugene P. Noonan, 126 Peralta Hills Drive, Anaheim, CA 92807.
He has lived in the area since 1972. He his a remodeling
contractor. There are circumstances about the house that should
give them the opportunity to have the requested variance
granted. ~e lot sits an~here from 10 feet to 4 feet below
street level instead of above. Working from the photographs
posted on the Chamber wall, he showed his residence end the five
surrounding homes which are all on large hills above and around
his home. As of today, there is no opposition from any of those
homeowners. He briefed what of the photographs depicted and
also summarized the variances that have been granted in the
surrounding area. /%~e nearest house to his is 200 feet away.
His house is 4 feet lower than the original plans for the lot.
They will not be obstructing anybody's view and are not hurting
anybody by the requested variance. ~e variance should not be
denied.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN FAVOR: None.
652
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN OPPOSITION:
Roland Krueger, 561 Peralta Hills Drive.
The house is said to be a remodel but there is no evidence of it
at this time. It is essentially completely torn down. The
original plans called for a 25-foot house and later this was
altered to go to 29 1/2 feet. No one noticed that until Mr.
Noonan was stopped by the building inspector. Now his house is
pretty much constructed. The original ridge line was over 25
feet. It was about 57 feet long or 50% of the structure. After
the first hearing with the Zoning Administrator, Mr.' Noonan said
he was going to cut the ridge line down to about 36 feet. It is
still 35% or more of the total ridge area. It is also well over
the 20% of the roof area above 25 feet. The Zoning
Administrator properly denied the variance because the house
does not meet the existing Code as far as height nor does it
meet the proposed new Code or the requirements for a variance
with special circumstances related to the land. There is
nothing unusual about the lot. The only house nearby over 25
feet is sitting up against a hill. The appeal should be denied
because it does not meet the existing or new Code or
requirements for a variance. If approved, because the house is
substantially built up, it will encourage other builders to try
the same - they will have nothing to lose. There are strong
reasons for denying this variance.
Hoyt Vanderpool, 119 South Peralta Hills Drive (across the
street).
This is the second time he has been to a public hearing
regarding the same subject. He has lived in the area since
1974. He is very concerned over what he sees going on. He
agrees with everything Mr. Krueger has said. It should not
matter if the structure is already built. A message needs to be
sent that such requests will not be approved and the time to
send that message is now.
SUMMATION BY APPLICANT: Eugene Noonan.
He is not concerned about the whole house. There is 235 feet of
ridge line on the house and he is talking about only 50 feet of
it. He is only 4 feet 2 inches high on his house and Mr.
Vanderpool is objecting when his (Vanderpool's) house is not
visible from his house and vice versa. None of the immediate
neighbors surrounding his house are present to object. They all
feel what he is doing is a great improvement since it was a
"dump" before. Ail he wants is a house to live in that he can
be proud of. He has been building in the City since 1973.
Mr. Krueger who is nowhere near his house has objected to every
variance in the area, even those that have been approved. If
the house is decreased by 4 feet, it will not help the look of
the area.
653
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27. 1989, 1:30
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION; On motion by
Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the City Council
determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of Section
3.01 Class 1, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to the requirements for an
Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to file an EIR. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION; The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 89R-287)
Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 89R-287 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-287; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 3927.
Before a vote was taken, Mayor Hunter suggested that Mr. Noonan look at the
new ordinance that was just adopted relative to height standards which
considers chimney, cupolas, etc. It is a good ordinance and one which he
feels should eliminate many hearings on height variances.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolution.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-287 duly passed and adopted.
179: PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 3151 AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION;
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Chestnut Properties
201 S. Balcolm,
Fullerton, CA 92632
AGENT:
Kalil Melan
923 Lamark Lane,
Anaheim, CA 92802
654
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1:30 P.M.
LOCATION/REQUEST:
106, 107 and 108).
market.
The property is located at 414 S. Manchester Avenue (Suites
The request is to permit a 2,160 square-foot convenience
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Conditional Use Permit No. 3151 was granted by
the Planning Commission, under Resolution No. PC89-129; approved EIR Negative
Declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilman
Pickler and Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of May 23, 1989, and public
hearing scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 15, 1989.
Posting of property June 15, 1989.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet June 16, 1989.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 8, 1989.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Mr. Jess Hishmek, agent, was present to answer questions.
COUNCIL CONCERNS:
Councilwoman Kaywood stated she believed that Councilman Pickler
was concerned that too much was being proposed on a small piece
of property. She also noted 100 signatures on a petition in
opposition which concerns her as well.
Annika Santalahtt, Zoning Administrator.
She has a copy of the petition which was received at the
Planning Commission meeting which states above the signatures
that they are, "...opposed to the opening of a convenience
market at the corner of Santa Aha Street."
Councilwoman Kaywood.
~he note~ that the applicant iA a~king that hear and wine he
included and she wanted to know if that was one of the reasons
the residents were concerned: Miss Santalahti answered that was
not a reason stated in the petition.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN FAVOR: None.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN OPPOSITION:
None.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked if there was a parking problem.
655
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1:30 P,M.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator.
She answered no. The project meets parking requirements. The
person who spoke at the public hearing before the Planning
Commission submitted a written text of her commentary. Her name
is Freda Jackson, 431 South West Street, who expressed concern,
amongst many other things, that the market would draw an
undesirable element adding to the existing problems of the West
Street to Citron Street area, particularly between Broadway and
Santa Aha Street such as drug problems, burglary and vandalism.
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Her sympathies are with the neighborhood and she is concerned
over what happens when a convenience market goes into an area.
Councilman Daly.
The shopping center was built according to Code over a year ago
and it has been entirely vacant since that time. He feels a
vacant shopping center is more of a disservice to the community.
than a convenience market will be.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION; On motion by Councilman
Hunter, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING RESOLUTION; The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 89R-288)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 89R-288 for adoption, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 3151, upholding the findings of the City Planning
Commission. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-288; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3151.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-288 duly passed and adopted.
656
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1:30 P,M,
179: PUBLIC HEARING RECLASSIFICATION NO, 88-89-42, VARIANCE NO, 3910 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT: OWNERS:
EDGA Enterprises, a general partnership
ATTN: Les Lederer
1990 Westwood Blvd., 3rd Floor,
Los Angeles, CA 90025-4614
AGENT:
Loara High School Band Boosters, Inc.
1765 W. Cerritos Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92802
LOCATION/REQUEST: The property is located at 1490 South Anaheim Boulevard.
The request is for a change in zone from ML to CL, and for a waiver of minimum
number of required parking spaces to permit bingo in an existing teenage
nightclub.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Reclassification No. 88-89-42 was granted by the
Planning Commission, under Resolution No. PC89-135; Variance No. 3910 was
granted by the Planning Commission, under Resolution No. PC89-136; approved
Negative Declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilman
Kaywood and Councilman Pickler at the meeting of May 23, 1989, and public
hearing scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 15, 1989.
Posting of property June 15, 1989.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 16, 1989.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 8, 1989.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Manny Valdez, 1451 South Hacienda, representing Loara High
School Band Boosters and Mr. John Schroeder, Agent.
The Booster Organization is comprised of three Booster groups
one each ~or the band, the drill team and the courtiers. They
are the Loara Band family. They have one common goal, to raise
funds to allow their students the opportunity to perform as well
as being a student. To that end they have secured the Zap night
club for use in holding weekly bingo games. Their operating
budget is approximately $50,000 a year, only 8% of which is
received from the Anaheim Union High School District. Amongst
all of their fundraising activities, bingo is their main source
of funds. The band program is made up of almost 200 members.
They are asking the Council to look favorably on their request.
657
City Hall, Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27. 1989, 1;30
Mr. Valdez then answered a line of questions posed by Council
Members wherein he reported that the Bingo Committee will be
running the games and there are no professional bingo operators.
Annika Santalahtt, Zoning Administrator, clarified for
Councilwoman Kaywood that relative to the reclassification from
ML to commercial, only the corner parcel is involved and not the
entire parcel.
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Under those conditions, she does not have a problem although she
feels it is sad it is necessary to resort to gambling to support
schools and educational projects.
Councilman Ehrle.
He recalled some time ago that an organization had to use the
facility for some type of administration or that the facility
had to be used on a regular basis.
City Attorney White.
It was a point he was about to make. The state law that
authorizes bingo games as well as the Municipal Code requires as
part of obtaining the bingo permit for this or any other
location that the licensee will have to demonstrate the property
is being used by the organization either as an office or for
some other purpose for which the organization is established
other than merely playing bingo. The law does not allow an
organization to rent a big auditorium or location and simply use
that location to play bingo. They have to conduct some other
aspect of their activity at the same location. While Council
today can determine the zoning where bingo would legally be
authorized under the Zoning Code, in order to obtain a bingo
permit, it will be necessary for the licensee to demonstrate to
the license collector and his office that the property is being
leased for some other purpose by the organization other than
merely playing bingo.
Manny Valdez.
For the last 1 1/2 years, they have used the facility for other
fundraisers as well.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Hunter, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
658
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS: The titles of the following resolution were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 89R-289 and 89R-290)
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilman Daly seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 89R-289 for adoption, granting
Reclassification No. 88-89-42 involving the corner parcel only. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-289; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF
CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Daly, Ehrle, Kaywood and Hunter
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-289 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 89R-290 for adoption, granting
Variance No. 3910, upholding the findings of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO, 89R-290; A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 3910.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly, Ehrle and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 89R-290 duly passed and adopted.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated she abstained on voting on the variance because
she has a problem with bingo.
RECESS; By general consent the Council recessed for ten minutes. (3:59 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS; The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (4:10 p.m.)
659
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M,
179: REHEARING - VARIANCE NO 3935 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT:
OWNER:
Arvino Patel and Parvati Patel
425 W. Katella Avenue,
Anaheim, CA 92802
AGENT:
Dennis Bradford and Robert Waddle
301 N. W. 63rd, Suite 500,
Oklahoma City, OK, 73116
LOCATION: The property is located at 615 W. Katella Avenue.
PROJECT AS ORIGINALLY REQUESTED: To construct a 130 room hotel with two code
waivers (See below).
PROJECT AS APPROVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION; Variance No. 3935 was granted
(PC89-115) for a 130 room hotel with code waivers: (a) minimum landscaped
setbacks - approved; (b) minimum number of parking spaces - approved: approved
EIR Negative Declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
At public hearing was held before the City Council on June 6, 1989, Variance
No. 3935 was denied under Resolution No. 89R-223. A request for rehearing and
affidavit of merit was submitted and a rehearing granted by the Council at the
meeting of June 13, 1989, and public hearing scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin May 26, 1989.
Posting of property May 26, 1989.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - May 24, 1989.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated Aprtl 24, 1989.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Dennis Bradford, 6711 Avendale Drive, Nichols Hills, Oklahoma,
Chairman of the Board and Ghlef Executive Officer, Coachman Inns
and Hotels, representing the owners of the property at 615 West
Katella Avenue.
He first gave the background on his company, Coachman Locations
and financial and organizational data (see annual report,
Coachman, Inc. 1988 submitted and made a part of the record).
They have designed a quality all-suites product of 130 rooms.
He briefed the amenities to be included in the facility.
Relative to parking, they were told when they came to Anaheim
and talked to City staff, if they had a parking study that
showed that they qualified for a 6/10 car per room parking
variance, that it had been granted routinely in the past. If
the study showed they would not be a burden to the City, they
could qualify for that variance. Such a study was done by a
660
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27. 1989, 1;30 P.M,
professional Traffic Engineer. They, therefore, applied for a
variance to go from 8/10 car per room to 6/10. It was approved
at the Planning Commission. The parking is going to be built
indoors, one floor on grade going down 5% to the bottom of the
parking garage. He explained why it was efficient use of the
land and that it would look better to have cars out of sight.
He then showed the Council a color rendering of the property.
The bus loading and unloading area has been widened to
accommodate a fire truck and also four outside parking spaces to
accommodate check-in and check-out. It will be a No Parking
area outside. Ail parking will be inside the garage.
Relative to the variance on landscaping, when the project was
originally designed, it set back about 53 feet from the road.
He then explained how in finality they were left with only three
feet for landscaping after dedicating 12 feet for the critical
intersection widening, providing for the requirement of the
Traffic Department for a drive for bus loading and unloading and
also additional space required by the Fire Department to provide
access for their ladder trucks. In order to compensate, they
have opted to do the entire drive out of paver brick set in
concrete. Behind the heavily landscaped 3-foot strip, there
will be 25 feet of paver brick and behind that another 20 feet
of landscaping in the center of the property and a 2-foot
landscaped piece on each side. From the street it gives the
effect of having landscaping all the way back into the
property. He then submitted photos showing what he was
describing which he took in Los Angeles (made a part of the
record). They have created the illusion of landscaping without
the landscaping. He then showed a drawing of how the property
would look from the air and using an overlay, how it would look
with Katella widened. They are also proposing street lights in
front of their property which is one of their trademarks.
Mayor Hunter asked if anyone wished to speak either in favor or in opposition;
there was no response.
Extensive discussion and questioning took place between Mr.
Bradford and Council Members during which Mr. Bradford relayed
the following information: They will have three elevators going
from the parking garage into the lobby, people will park first
and then check in, there will be no valet parking, there will be
four spaces in the front dedicated to short term parking, there
will be a door man, not to carry bags or park cars, but to
direct people to either park in the garage or to park in front
for short time use, their other properties are about the same
size and they take no reservations at most of those because they
are interstate locations, there are two parking spaces in front
of those facilities and they have never had any problems, if
cars are illegally parked, they will be towed off the property..
661
City Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M.
Paul Singer, Traffic Engineer.
His recommendation regarding the property has not changed in any
way because the project has not been amended from the last
hearing. The parking waiver is justifiable based on the traffic
study as submitted. His major concern and recommendation as
expressed previously is the inadequacy of parking up front which
is exacerbated by the fact that the facility is located across
the street from the Convention Center. The hotel will
eventually have to charge for parking, thereby making the
parking required in the four spaces to be used for parking at
the porte cochere mandatory but those may be unavailable since
people will use those spaces to park other than for the hotel.
He does not feel there is any provision made for loading of
necessary equipment, loading or unloading of trucks, etc. which
concerns him greatly. It is required of any facility that
provides any type of services. Bus parking has been pretty much
resolved because they can be parked and loaded and unloaded on
the 25-foot porte cochere if it is free (available). If not
free, it will cause additional problems. Tour buses will have
difficulty entering and exiting the property if cars are present
in the porte cochere. If they provide a door man, it should be
made a condition of approval of the project. The City is now in
the process of a CR area study and he believes one of the tasks
is going to be to develop new standards for the orientation of
hotels and how they should be serviced by vehicles. He feels
this one is substantially deficient in that area.
Councilman Ehrle.
He voted against the project the first time and subsequently
voted in favor of a rehearing. He feels this hearing has
provided new and additional information and his concerns have
been answered. A door man directing people will solve the
problem out front. A question he has is relative to the
convenience market on the corner adjacent to the subject
property and if there have been any discussions relative to that
piece of property.
Dennis Bradford.
Prior to buying the site, they had discussions with the owner of
the 7-11 and also the T-shirt store. They could build a better
product if they had both of those properties but there was no
inclination on the part of the property owners to sell at that
time. He understands that 7-11 has agreed to the dedication of
for the critical intersection but he does not know how they are
going to operate after they do so. They would like to buy both
properties and open that up into a nice corner entrance and
close the back entrance to be used strictly as a swimming pool
area. They could also build additional rooms and provide
additional services at the hotel. That is their long-range plan
and they are the logical buyer.
662
City Hall. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P,M,
Paul Singer.
In order to relieve some of the traffic due to the hotel if the
Council approves the project, he recommended that the developer
as part of his good will and to mitigate any possible impacts,
to construct that portion of the critical intersection from
Harbor Boulevard to the very end where they have the dedication
and that that be a condition of development.
Mr. Bradford stated they had agreed to dedicate the
right-of-way; the Mayor clarified Mr. Singer is recommending
that the applicant also construct the road.
Mr. Saylor Kennedy, 420 Madison Avenue, Toledo, Ohio, Financial
Advisor and the person who has financed the subject project.
This is the only project in Anaheim that actually has a 25-foot
clear-span driveway - others have 12 feet with an island in the
center which causes traffic problems. Turning in there is
really 28 feet to the porte cochere. The four spaces will be
sufficient in the front. It would not be a problem even without
a door man. They are one of the last few hotel financers in the
country right now that are doing hotels the way that they need
to be done. They are more restrictive with the builder than the
City is in many ways. They have looked at Anaheim very closely
in providing financing to the people who want to develop. They
want to know they have a safe project and one that is of high
quality in case they get "stuck" with it. He has personally
gone up and down all of the hotels in the area. There will not
be a problem with parking in front of the proposed project.
Councilman Daly.
Looking at the site plan on the property, it is more than
one-half acre. There are several properties well over that size
with very nice adequate circulation for people who want to get
onto the property. He can think of a dozen other properties
that are further back from the street than this project.
Saylor Kennedy.
He is not talking about being further back from the street but
the drive-thru - 25 feet coming in and 28 feet to the porte
cochere. It is the only property that has a clear-span
drive-thru.
Councilman Daly.
There is no hotel as big as the one proposed on that small a
piece of property. It is too big a project for too small a
site. It is in the busiest section of the City and he does not
think the design does service to the site, vicinity or
neighborhood. It has been "shoe horned" onto the site. Katella
is very crucial. He agrees with Mr. Singer's concerns and he
has a number of others as well. Until the project suits the
site, he cannot support it.
663
City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1:30 P.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood.
She is also concerned that the project is proposed to go 20 feet
underground right on the property line with no setback thereby
endangering existing buildings on both sides. She, too, feels
there is too much on too little space. Since it is across the
street from the Convention Center when there is overflow parking
and to avoid paying, people will park on the subject property
and there will be no room for guests. As a result, it would
only be a matter of time that a booth will be necessary to
control parking and charge fees which will take up more space on
the property.
Mr. Bradford again countered the concerns expressed about
parking especially in the porte cochere area and the adequacy
for bus loading and unloading. They have tried diligently to
meet all the codes and all the requests of the parking people.
He also submitted pictures of the Simon Wtesenthal Center in
Beverly Hills which is a 6-story building being built over
5-stories of underground parking and which is 4 feet away from
an occupied apartment house. The depth is 48 feet below grade
at the deepest point. The photo showed steel driven pilings and
concrete. Other pictures showed a building that had been
completed also in Beverly Hills using exactly the same technique
which will be used on the subject project, one which is used all
over the country and a tried and true proven method. It is not
a concern Councilwoman Kaywood should have.
Councilman Daly.
He hopes the developer will take a stab at redesigning the
project to fit the site. He cannot accept the project with the
present design.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Hunter, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further findtn~ on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Hunter offered a resolution granting Variance No. 3935, reversing
the findings of the City Planning Commission. The resolution failed to carry
by the following vote:
664
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M,
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly and Kaywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
Mayor Hunter.
He is going to move that the hearing be continued to August 1,
1989 when there is a full Council. He had spoken to Councilman
Pickler stating if he wants to vote on the project that he
listen to the tape of the proceedings so that he could vote if
the matter were continued and it would not require a full public
hearing again.
City Attorney White.
The hearing is closed. If the Council wishes to continue it as
a closed hearing they could do so or they can reopen it and if
Councilman Pickler did have questions of the applicant at that
time or would like to receive comments, the Council could do
what they wish. Legally there is no impediment to continuing
the hearing and allowing Councilman Pickler to listen to the
tapes and to vote on it at any meeting at which it is continued
and where he is present. He clarified that a 2-2 vote is
failing to act on the resolution. It is not denying the project.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
Councilman Hunter moved to continue the public hearing to August 1, 1989 for a
full Council hearing. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman
Pickler was absent. The motion failed to carry by the following vote:
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle and Hunter
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Daly and Kaywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
City Attorney White.
It is necessary to have three affirmative votes to deny or
approve the project. The matter is still before the Council for
a determination and will be until the determination is made one
way or the other. The Charter requires three votes to adopt a
resolution.
After additional Council discussion relative tg~the project as well as viewing
a model of the project provided by Mr. Bradford, Councilman Daly moved to
continue the public hearing on Variance No. 3935 and Negative Declaration to
Tuesday, July 25, 1989 at 3:00 p.m. to give the courtesy of a vote to
Councilman Pickler and that the public hearing be reopened to allow testimony
from any interested persons. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion.
Councilwoman Kaywood voted no. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
665
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 27, 1989, 1;30 P.M.
114/179/172; STUDY IN THE CR AREA; Councilman Daly referred to a memo dated
June 21, 1989 from the Planning Director, Joel Fick, to the City Engineer
concerning the commercial-recreation (CR) area around Dtsneyland. Staff is
awaiting traffic data being put together by County Government. Waiting for
that new data will delay portions of the study. He imagines it is the
transportation portions of the study and that delay will be up to 16 weeks.
He would like to ask staff if there is a way to move forward on this very
important study that they do so while awaiting the updated data from County
Government and that the consultant be authorized to proceed with the work. A
4-month delay is of concern to him. He asked the City Manager if there was a
way the Council could get a report back on moving forward with the study yet
anticipating the new data from County.
City Manager Simpson answered yes and it will not take 16 weeks. He will get
information to the Council immediately and then send it openly so that
everyone else will be apprised of the status.
114/105: WORKSHOP WITH THE PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD; Councilman Ehrle referred
to a report from the Public Utilities General Manager, Gordon Hoyt. In the
past, the Council has had joint workshops with the Planning Commission and
updates on transportation with the City Engineer. It is getting to the point
where he would like to have a joint workshop with the Public Utilities Board,
especially in light of the memo and some of the comments made, one regarding a
rate increase sometime in October. Rather than react, he feels a joint
workshop with the Public Utilities Board and staff making a presentation, the
Council could be fully apprised of utility matters before they occur rather
than having to react after the fact.
Councilwoman Kaywood felt that the Council was kept fully aware of utility
matters through the minutes they received of Board meetings as well as
information provided by the Department to customers in their utility bills.
After a brief Council discussion, Councilman Daly suggested that if such a
workshop is designed to accomplish something and improve the already good
communication existing between the Council and the Public Utilities Board, he
thinks it is worthwhile to pursue but he would like to see more details and as
the Mayor stated wait until Councilman Pickler comes back and discuss it.
ADJOURNMENT; Councilman Hunter moved to adjourn. Councilman Daly seconded
the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (5:35 p.m.)
No Council meetings are scheduled for July 4 and July 11, 1989, as a result of
previous action cancelling those meetings.
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
666