Loading...
1988/06/21Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Bob Simpson CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White ASSISTANT CITY CLERK: Ann M. Sauvageau SENIOR PLANNER: Greg Hastings ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Annika Santalahti PLAN/qING DIRECTOR: Joel Fick STADIUM GENERAL MANAGER: Greg Smith PUBLIC UTILITIES GENERAL MANAGER: Gordon Hoyt MANAGER OF GOLF OPERATIONS: Dave Morgan DIKECTOR OF MAINTENANCE: John Roche POLICE CHIEF: Joseph Molloy DATA PROCESSING DIRECTOR: Philip Grmmmatica FINANCE DIRECTOR: George Ferrone A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was posted at 3:09 p.m. on June 17, 1988 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing ali items as shown herein. Mayor Bay called the meeting to order at 12:00 noon. REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Jack White requested a Closed Session to consider the following items: a. To confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 40-92-46; City of Anaheim vs. Anaheim Hotel Partnership, O.C.S.C.C. No. 46-96-59; Baker vs. Valleau, et al., O.C.S.C.C. No. 51-14-59. b. To discuss labor relations matters - Government Code Section 54957.6. c. To discuss personnel matters - Government Code Section 54957. d. To confer with its Attorney regarding potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1). e. To consider such other matters as are orally announced by the City Attorney, City Manager or City Council prior to such recess unless the motion to recess indicates any of the matters will not be considered in Closed Session. AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present, and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. (1:46 p.m.) 629 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 1988~ 1:30 P.M. INVOCATION: Reverend Bill Craig, East Anaheim Christian Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Mayor Pro Tem Irv Pickler led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 119: PRESENTATION - CHEVRON U.S.A. - PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES FOUNDATION: Mary Ann Barngrover, Public Affairs Manager for Chevron U.S.A., presented the Anaheim Parks, Recreation and Community Services Foundation with a check in the amount of $$,500 to be utilized through Oak Canyon Nature Center for preservation of wild life. On behalf of the City of Anaheim, Mayor Bay accepted the donation by Chevron U.S.A. Co-accepting was Jacqueline Terrell, Chairman, Anaheim Parks, Recreation and Community Services Foundation. 119: DECLARATION: A Declaration of Thanks was unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to Mary Ann Barngrover, Public Affairs Manager for Chevron U.S.A., thanking Chevron for their generous donation to the City to preserve wildlife through the Oak Canyon Nature Center. Mayor Bay again thanked Ms. Barngrover on behalf of the Council and the City. 119: DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION: Three Declarations of Recognition were unanimously adopted by the City Council to be presented to Marsha Craig, R.N., Martin Luther Hospital recognizing and congratulating her on being the first recipient of the Registered Nurse of the Year at Martin Luther Hospital; Dr. L. Subramanyam recognizing and congratulating him on being the first recipient of the Physician of the Year at Martin Luther Hospital, and recognizing and congratulating Terry Foulke on being the first recipient of the Employee of the Year at Martin Luther Hospital. MINUTES: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay, minutes of the regular meetings held May 10, 1988 and May 17, 1988, were approved. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $1,930,473.82, in accordance with the 1987-88 Budget, were approved. WAIVER OP RRADINO - RR§0LUTION§= The tltl~ of the following ra~olution~ on the Consent Calendar were read by the City Manager. (Resolutlon Nos. 88R-231 through 88R-240, both inclusive) Councilman Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions. Gouncllwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Pickler, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the following items were approved in accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilman Pickler offered Resolution Nos. 88R-231 through 88R-240, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 630 88' City Mall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988~ 1:30 P.M. Al. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as recommended: Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management: a. Claim submitted by Regents of UCI Medical Center for indemnity for damages sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about March 8, 1988. b. Claim submitted by Josephy Caporrimo for indemnity for damages sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about January 21, 1988. c. Claim submitted by Cecelia Silver for bodily injury sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 27, 1988. d. Claim submitted by Donna C. Bullock for wrongful termination sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about January 15, 1988. Application for Leave to Present Late Claim - Denied: e. Claim submitted by Teachers Insurance for bodily injury and property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about December 18, 1987. f. Claim submitted by G~mmell Industries for indemnity for damages sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about October 21, 1986. A2. 105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Senior Citizens Commission meeting held May 12, 1988. A3. 105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Community Services Board meeting held May 12, 1988. A4. 123: Approving the contract agreement and irrevocable offer to dedicate land as shown on Parcel Map No. 87-363 ("The S~mmit") located southerly of Sycamore Canyon and easterly of The Highlands, to satisfy conditions of approval set forth in Resolution No. 87R-272. AS. 170: Approving the Final Map of Tract No. 12854 and the Subdivision Agreement with Morgan Development, Inc. (Tract No. 12854 is located on the west side of Lakeview Avenue from the south side of Santa Aha Canyon Road to the north side of Cerro Vista Drive.) A6. 158: Authorizing the payment of $43,294 to Tamotsu 0ta for modifications to his building located at 920 North Anaheim Boulevard for the North Anaheim Boulevard Street Widening Project - R/W 3500-71. A7. 175: Awarding the contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder, Elser Constructors, in the amount of $240,875 for Ball Road Water Improvements from 1850' W/O Harbor Boulevard. 631 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 198~ 1:30 P.M. A8. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-231: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1977-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1404) (Levying an assessment of $34.97 on each lot and parcel of land) A9. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-232: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STRRmT LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-2 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1859) (Levying an assessment of $33.12 on each lot and parcel of land) Al0. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-233: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINEO IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-3 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO iMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1097) (Levying an assessment of $96.60 on each lot and parcel of land) All. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-234: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-4 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 1392) (Levying an assessment of $23.18 on each lot and parcel of land) Al2. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-235: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-7 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 2875) (Levying an assessment of $40.87 on each lot and parcel of land) Al3. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-236: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR T~E AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 1516 AND 1653) (Levying an assessment of $39.97 on each lot and parcel of land) Al4. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88K-237: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING ANASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-5 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1, 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE ST~RRT LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT 2090) (Levying an assessmemt of $28.98 on each lot and parcel of land) Al5. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-238: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYINGAN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1985-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY l, 632 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. 1988 TO JUNE 30, 1989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 1647, 3278 AND 3301) (Levying an assessment of $34.83 on each lot and parcel of land) Al6. 104: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order without competitive bidding to Hampton Tedder Electric Company, in an amount not to exceed $48,000 to ~remove and replace a 2000 KVA Transformer at the Convention Center. Al7. 160: Accepting the bid of Custom Floors, Inc. in an amount not to exceed $52,755 for carpet installation in the office areas at the Convention Center in accordance with bid proposal ~4604. Al8. 160: Accepting the low bid of Case & Son's Construction Incorporated, in the amount of $65,115 for repainting structural steel at Anaheim Stadium, ail in accordance with bid proposal #4588 as publicly advertised. Al9. 139: Supporting, in concept, legislation proposed by Assemblywoman Doris Allen (AB 2694 and AB 4250) regarding a recommended study to determine the cause of housing foundation deterioration problems, and communicating this position to Assemblywoman Allen. A20. 128: Receiving and filing the Monthly Financial Analysis presented by the Director of Finance for ten months ended April 30, 1988. A21. 128: Approving the 1987/88 write-off of uncollectible miscellaneous accounts receivable, Finance Department, totalling $68,588. A22. 123: Approving an extension of the weed abatement contract with Edwin Webber, Inc., for a period of one year beginning on May 19, 1988, and ending on May 19, 1989, subject to the same terms and conditions as set forth in the original agreement. A23. 153: Approving an.increase in rates for excess stop loss coverage (for Employee-from $4.27 to $4.68 per month, and Dependents-from $6.31 to $7.28 per month) provided by Boston Mutual Life Insurance Company for the self-funded Employee Medical Plan effective January 1, 1988. A24. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-239: A RESOLUTION OF THE CIYY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING KESOLUTION NO. 87K-512 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR CONFIDENTIAL JOB CLASSES. (Amending Resolution No. 87R-512 to implement the following class title changes effective June 24, 1988: from Senior Legal Secretary to Executive Legal Secretary, and Senior Secretary to Executive Secretary) A25. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-240: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE ANAHEIM FIR~iFIGHTERS ASSOCIATION, LOCAL 2899, AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Amending the Memorandum of Understanding, Article 31 pertaining to holidays) A26. 175/123: Approving the Secondary Main Reimbursement agreement with Arciero Companies which provides that funds collected from others benefiting 633 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. from the twelve inch water main in Tustin Avenue be returned to Arciero Companies. A27. 127: Approving the 1987/88 write-off of uncollectible Utility accounts totalling $695,813.94. Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 88R-231 through 88R-240: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 88R-231 through 88R-240, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. End of Consent Calendar. MOTIONS CARRIED. 123: ANAHEIM HOTEL PAKTNEKSHIP AGREEMENT - SETTLEMENT: City Attorney White announced that the need to take action regarding the subject arose after the printed agenda was posted on Friday, June 17, 1988. Each Council Mem0er was presented with copies of documents relating to this item. On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the Anaheim City Council determined that the need to act on the following item arose after the posting of the agenda for this meeting, on Friday, June 17, 1988, at 3:09 p.m.; and consequently waived the Brown Act requirement relative to posting the item on the printed agenda. MOTION CARRIED. On recommendation by the City Attorney, Councilman Bay moved that the City Council approve (1) that certain settlement agreement between the City of Anaheim and the Anaheim Hotel Partnership; (2) that certain settlement agreement and release between the City of AnAheim, the Community Center Authcrity, Anaheim Hotel Partnership, Sun Cal Investments No. 2 Ltd. and various other parties specified therein; (3) that certain purchase and sale agreement and escrow instructions between the City of Anaheim, Anaheim Hotel Partnership and LHK Corporation; (4) termination and partial termination agreements between the City of Anaheim and the Anaheim Hotel Partnership; and (3) all other deeds, instruments, releases and documents necessary to carry out the terms or purposes of the afora~aid agreements, all in such final forms as approved by the City Attorney, and that the City Council authorize and direct the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreements, deeds, instruments, releases and documents for and on behalf of the City of Anaheim. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 105: APPOINTMENTS TO FILL TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1988 ON THE FOLLOWING BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved that appointments to various City Boards and Commissions be continued one week. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Mayor Bay stated all but one are reappointments. He sees no problem in action on the reappointments today. 634 84 City ~ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion of continuance and failed to carry by the following vote: Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: AB SENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood and Pickler Ehrle, Hunter and Bay None Councilman Bay moved to reappoint all members of Boards and Commissions whose terms are expiring June 30, i988 and as listed on the agenda with the exception of the appointment of a Tenant Housing Commissioner. Councilman Hunter seconded the moiton. MOTIONCARRIEDUNANLMOUSLY. The following members were thereupon reappointed to their respective Boards and Commissions for the terms indicated: 105: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (4 YEARS) TERM ENDING JUNE 30, 1992: Lt. Col. Earl F. Rhoads. 105: COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD (4 YEARS) TER~ ENDING JUNE 30, 1992: Rick Gastil, Marjorie Rothrock, Vivtan Engelbrecht and Flu Tariton. 105: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD (4 YEARS) TERMS ENDING JUNE 30, 1992: Fred W. Bercher, Marshall Krupp, and Thomas Heinz. 105: PLANNING COMMISSION (4 YEARS) TERM ENDING JUNE 30, 1992: Mary Bouas. 105: SENIOR CITIZEN COMMISSION (3 YEARS) TERMS ENDING JUNE 30~ 1991: Ernest L. Sullivan and Muriel H. Nelson. 105: HOUSING COMMISSION FOR NEW TERM EXPIKING JUNE 30, 1990: On motion by Councilman Pickler, seconded by Councilman Hunter, appointment of a Tenant Commissioner on the Housing Commission, to expire June 30, i990, was continued one week to Tuesday, June 28, 1988. MOTION CARRIED. 142/127: PROPOSED AF~ENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER: Discussion of potential chan~es to the City Charter, to be placed on November 1988 ballot, was continued to Tuesday, June 28, 1988. 179/000/108: BILLBOARD LICENSE FEES: Zoning Administrator Anntka Santalahti reported that staff is continuing to process and analyze information which is still being received from billboard companies, and she requested that the issue be continued. On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the matter of establishing revised billboard license fees was continued to July 12, 1988, 6:30 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST: The following persons addressed the City Council concerning the proposed changes to billboard license fees: 635 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. Stephanie Scher, 300 S. Grand Avenue, Suite 1500, Los Angeles, California 90071-3125, Attorney representing Gannett Outdoor and Patrick Media: Stated she was present to request a continuance in this matter, and thanked the City Council for so doing. Robert Zemel, 7330 Stonecreek, Chairman of the Billboard Committee: Pointed out that the committee members were hoping for a decision on the establishment of license fees by the Council, to allow the committee to proceed with other vital issues, such as billboards along freeways, etc. Both committee members and billboard company representatives had agreed that the fees should be established prior to consideration of related issues. Im response to question by Councilman Pickler, Mr. Zemel noted some of the factors to be considered in determining the need for additional billboards within the city, i.e., community service messages and local advertising as an advantage to the city, along with the proposed increased revenues. Lydia Sullivan, of Gannett Outdoor, Southern California: Stated it was not their intent to forestall the decision on the revised business license fees, and she saw no problem with the billboard committee proceeding with their consideration of standards. Francis X. Nutto, 2621 S. Jambolaya Street, Anaheim 92806, addressed the Council suggesting consideration of adopting the minimum fee schedule as proposed by the billboard companies, which would be the same as those in the City of Santa Ana: 0/300 square feet - - $ 75.00; 301/672 square feet - 3100.00. This schedule could be adopted now and adjusted after the committee agrees on a business license fee schedule. 179: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S DECISIONS - MEETING OF JUNE 2, 1988: VARIANCE NO. 3779, CATEGORICALTJ EXE/~PT, CLASS 3-A OWNER: LEDWIN L. FORTiNI AND ANNALEE FORTINI, 53il Mountain View Avenue, Yorba Linda, CA 92686 LOCATION: 6820 E. Avenida de Santiago To construct a 2-story, 30 foot high, single-family residence with waiver of maximum structural height. Variance No. 3779 APPROVED by the Zoning Administrator, Decision No. ZA88-33. Decision Date: June 9, 1988. C2. VARIANCE NO. 3780, CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS-5 OWNER: EUGENE A. DURBIN AND LINDA DURBIN, 2545 E. Tennyson Avenue LOCATION: 2545 E. Tennyson Avenue To construct an approximate 998 square-foot addition to an existing single-family residence with waiver of minimum "front-on" garage setback. Variance No. 3780 APPROVED by the Zoning Administrator, Decision No. zA88-34. 636 City Hall, A~_aheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 1988, 1:30 P.M. Decision Date: June 9, 1988. C3. ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 0009, CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS-5 REQUESTED BY: CRAIG A. MOCK, 4308 E. La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92807 To construct a covered porch with waiver of minimum front setback (25 feet required; 20 feet proposed) in conjunction with a new single-family residence at the northeast corner of Danielle Circle and Owens Drive. Administrative Adjustment No. 0009 APPROVED by the Zoning Administrator, Decision No. ZA88-35. Decision Date: June 9, 1988. End of Zoning Administrator items. No action taken by Council. MOTIONS CARRIED. 179: REQUEST, EXEMPTION FROM REQUIREMENT TO FILE FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT: Request was submitted by Gary Mierau, Vice President, Park/Abrams Development Company, for exemption from requirements of Ordinance No. 4901 to allow issuance of a building permit to construct a commercial retail center and Circle K convenience market at 1177 South State College Boulevard without first obtaining a conditional use permit. Also submitted was staff report from the Planning Department dated June 14, 1988. Mr. Mierau addressed the Council advising that the applicants were victims of the new ordinance, adopted February 23, 1988, and effective March 24, 1988; revised plans had already been introduced into the building permit process after the initial proposal under Conditional Use Permit No. 2950 had been considered by the Planning Commission. Representatives of the residential area adjacent to subject property had appeared and given input at that time. City Attorney Jack White advised that once the ordinance was adopted, the only developments which might be exempted would be those for which building permits had already been obtained and construction started. The City Council does not have the authority to waive provisions of the ordinance, and it would be necessary to prepare another ordinance to exempt certain projects. Councilman Ehrle felt it was not equitable to penalize the developer who was proceeding through the necessary steps at the time the ordinance was adopted. Councilwoman Kaywood moved that request by Park/Abrams Development Company for exemption from provisions of Ordinance No. 4901 be denied. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. Councilman Ehrle voted "No". Councilman Hunter abstained. MOTION CARRIED. 103: SERRANO AVENUE NO. 3 ANNEXATION: Approving annexation of approximately 4.03 acres at the northwest corner of Nohl Ranch Road and Serrano Avenue, as recommended by the Planning Department. WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was read by the City Clerk. [Resolution No. 88R-242) 637 7,9 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 1988, 1:30 P.M. Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 88R-242 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 88R-242: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND ORDERING THE ANNEXATION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERR/TORY KNOWN AND DESIGNATED SERRANO AVENUE NO. 3 ANNEXATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCILMEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickier and Bay None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-242 duly passed and adopted. 185: ORDINANCE NO. 4935: Approving a Development Agreement with Baldwin Building Company, finding that the provisions of said Development Agreement are consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said agreement for and on behalf of the City. (Development Agreement No. 88-03) WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCE: The title of the following ordinance was read by the City Clerk. (Ordinance No. 4935) Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinance. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4935 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4935: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (i) APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND ~LN BUILDING COMPANY, (ii) FINDII~ THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SAID DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND (iii) AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT FOR AND ON BA~CLF OF T~E CITY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4935 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, the u~l recessed to 3:00 P.M. MOTION CARRIED. AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (3:05 P.M.) 638 City Me_Il, Anaheim, Cmlffornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. 179: PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3009, CATEGOR_ICALI~ EXEMPT~ CLASS-3: APPLICANT: OWNERS: Jerry L. and Judy A. Madren 503 South Vicki Lane Anaheim, CA 92804 REQUEST/LOCATION: To permit a 640 square-foot "Granny Unit"; property located at 503 South Vicki Lane. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: The City Planning Commission granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3009, Resolution No. PC88-127; approved categorical exemption determination (Class 3). HEARING SET ON: Review of action taken by the Planning Commission was requested by Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of May 31, 1988, and public hearing scheduled this date. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY: Publication in the Anaheim Bulletin June 9, 1988. Posting of Property June 10, 1988. Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 10, 1988. PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 9, 1988. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Judy Madren, 503 South Vicki Lane, Anaheim, CA 92804. The planned addition to their home is to provide smaller living quarters for her parents so that her mother can provide care for her father, who is an invalid, and retain some privacy while being close to Mr. and Mrs. Madren for necessary assistance. When a petition in opposition was submitted, Mrs. Madren talked to many of those who signed that document, and found that many had been misinformed about the nature of the request. She points out that she and Mr. Madren are spending $80,000 to insure that the addition will be architecturaly pleasing, and she states that they have no intention of sellln$ their property. STAFF INPUT: In response to questions by Councilman Bay, Zoning Administrator Annika Santalahti advised that the California Government Code specifies that if certain criteria are met, the City cannot deny this type of request. This request, including an additional parking space condition, meets all City and State requirements. Deed restrictions will be filed and recorded against the property requiring that the occupants of the unit must be a minimum of sixty years of age in order for the unit to be maintained as a separate dwelling space. 639 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. City Attorney Jack White pointed out that this type of addition, referred to as a "Granny Unit", is allowed in all residential zones within the State when it meets mandated criteria. The City Council has the prerogative of imposing additional conditions. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: Pat Fernandez, 2776 Rowland Circle, Anaheim: Questions the definition of "outside access". She is advised that this particular request includes a kitchen in the plans, which renders the quarters a separate unit; Code requires outside access to a separate unit on residential property. Don Lowe, 441 Vicki Lane: Expressed concern that granting subject request would constitute the end of the R-1 Zone in their neighborhood, and the inspiration for more "Granny Unit" requests. While not opposed to how the applicants propose to utilize their addition, he felt the same purpose could be accomplished within the residence as it presently exists. His primary objection is to the separate, self-contained unit proposed, and he anticipates problems in monitoring the compliance with deed restrictions in the future. Further, he questioned the use of the unit if the property should be sold or the occupants leave. His examination of the State Law found no penalties set out for misuse. Jean Mann, 2776 Bridgeport Avenue: States she would not object if the kitchen were eliminated from the plans, and the entrance placed indoors. Jim Wallace, 435 S. Shields Drive: Addressed the City Council in support of the applicants. Mrs. Royal C. Howes, 2772 Bridgeport Avenue: Calls attention to the fact that Mr. Wallace, the previous speaker, did not reside in the subject neighborhood. An eighteen-year resident, she had assigned one of their existing rooms and bath to her own mother, who had lived there with the family for many years without any alterations to the original dwelling. She expressed concern that the proposed use of the "Granny Unit" could not be adequately controlled. Sam B. Gould, 408 S. Vicki Lane: Expresses opposition to the application. John Milne, 425 S. Vicki Lane: Also opposed, he wants to retain the R-1 Zone. He was of the opinion that there were other residents in the neighborhood who would apply for similar expansions, should subject request be granted. In response to questions by Councilman Pickler and Councilwoman Kaywood, Applicant Judy Madren understands that they would not 640 City ~] 1, A~_sheim, C~ltfornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. have had to make application through the Planning Commission if they had not wanted the kitchen included as a convenience to her parents, to help them be self-sufficient. She indicates she would have no objection to a restriction being imposed that the permit for this addition would no longer be valid if the property were sold. SUM~..TION BY APPLICANT: William Centobene, representing his sister, Judy Madren, advised that this small addition to the applicant's home would cost $80,000; when completed, from the street it would look the same as others in the neighborhood. COUNCIL CONCERNS: Councilman Ehrle. If approved, he wants the opponents protected by requiring that when the "Granny Unit" is no longer in use by the applicants, the kitchen is to be removed. COUNCIL ACTION: There being no further persons who wished to speak either in favor or in opposition, Mayor Bay closed the public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the City Council determined that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categoricaliy exempt from the requirement to file an ElK. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING -RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 88R-243) Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 88R-243 for adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 3009 subject to City Planning Commission conditions and furhter that upon sale of the property, the unit shall be modified to comply with Code so that the CUP is no longer necessary and that a covenant be recorded reflecting same. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 88R-243: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3009. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCLLMEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCLLMEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-243 duly passed and adopted. 641 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 1988, 1:30 P.M. 179: PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 3785 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CLASS-3A: APPLICANT: OWNERS: Robert C. Lundstrom & Mary A. Lundstrom 939 South Lake Summit Anaheim, California 92807 REQUEST/LOCATION: The request is for waiver of maximum structural height to construct a 2-story, 33-foot high, to chimney, and 29.5-foot high, to roof peak, single-family residence at 1125 South Tamarisk Drive. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION: Zoning Administrator Decision No. ZA88-24 approved said variance. HEARING SET ON: Review of the Zoning Administrator's decision was requested by Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of May 24, 1988, and public hearing scheduled this date. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREM_ENTS MET BY: Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 9, 1988. Posting of property June 10, 1988. Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 10, 1988. PLANNING DEPARTMENT INPUT: See Staff Report to the Zoning Administrator dated May 5, 1988. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Mr. Tim Doss, Architect representing the applicant, 1793 Whittier Avenue, Costa Mesa, California: Reviewed the request and pointed out there is a hill on one side of the property, leaving the only exposure on the side of the house with the lowest elevation; the structure would not impact views from other residences. Responding to questions posed by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Doss stated that access to the property is very limited, and the house was designed to adapt to the lot in the most practical and aesthetic way possible, given the topography involved. COUNCIL ACTION: There being no further persons who wished to speak either in favor or in opposition, Mayor Bay closed the public hearing. ENVIkONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, the City Council determined that the proposed activity fails within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3A, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 88R-244) 642 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988~ 1:30 P.M. Councilman Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No. 88R-244 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 88R-244: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY 0f ANA~iEiM GRA~TiNG VAR_LANCE NO. 3785. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL~IEMBEES: NOES: COUNCIL M_EMBERS: A~SENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-244 duly passed and adopted. 179: PUBLIC HEARING, VARIA/~CE NO. 3786 AND CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION, CLASS-3E: APPLICANT: OWNERS: LoDel Financial Corp., Attn: Gary Lobel 2528 W. Woodland Drive, A~aheim, California 92801 REQUEST/LOCATION: Requesting waivers of (a) minimum front setback and permitted encroachment, and (b) maximum fence height to construct a 6-foot high wrought iron fence with gate adjacent to Brookhurst Street on property located at 1237 South Brookhurst Street. ZONING ADMINISTRATOR ACTION: Zoning Administrator Decision No. ZA88-24 approved Variance No. 3786, in part. HEARING SET ON: Appeal of action taken by the Zoning Administrator was filed by Gary Lobel on May 20, 1988, and public hearing scheduled this date. i~JBLIC NOTICE REQUIP. F~TS MET BY: Publication in Anaheim Bulletin June 9, 1988. Posting of property June 10, 1988. Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - June 10, 1988. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Gary Lobel, Owner's Representative: At present, subject property is utilized as a used car sales lot and storage. There is a three-foot landscaped strip at the front property line, and they proposed to install a fence in front of that strip; however the Zoning Administrator required that the fence be located behind the strip. He called attention to other auto sales facilities in the city, i.e. Bauer Jaguar on Manchester Avenue, and Midway Mobile on Anaheim Boulevard, both of which have a similar situation with fences in front. He failed to see what substantial difference the three feet would make in locating the 643 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. fence, and submitted several snapshots of the premises for the record. He felt they would have better usage of the property with the additional three feet. Responding to question posed by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Lobel pointed out that the fence would be lowered during business hours, and therefore would be no obstacle to pladement of trash containers for pickup. Councilman Hunter: Fails to understand why the Zoning Administrator's decision is not proper, since the location is in a residential area, as opposed to the commercial/industrial areas where the other dealers are located. Planning Director, Joel Fick: In response to question by Councilman Ehrle, states that the subject property is located across the street from residences which differentiates the property from the others described; there is a landscaped setback required to be maintained in this area. COUNCIL ACTION: There being no further persons who wished to speak either in favor or in opposition, Mayor Bay closed the public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council determined that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3E, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR. WAIVLR OF READING - RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 88R-245) Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution. Councilman Ehrie seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 88R-245 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 88R-245: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING IN PART, VARLaJNCE NO. 3786, SUBJECT TO ZONING ADMINISTRATOR CONDITIONS. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickier and Bay None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-245 duly passed and adopted. 644 ?4 City Hail, Anaheim, Ca_!!fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988~ 1:30 P.M. 106: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RESOURCE ALLOCATION PLAN: To consider the proposed 1988/89 Resource Allocation Plan (RAP). This matter was continued from the meetings of June 7 and June 14, 1988, to this date. (See minutes those dates). City Manager Simpson first announced that the report from Program Development and Audit will be abbreviated and presented as part of the resolution adoption on the budget scheduled for June 28, 1988. He also stated that since written comments have been prepared and submitted by Department Heads (made a part of the record) he has asked the Departments to abbreviate their comments but to highlight anything special and after each presentation, any Council questions will be answered. Mr. Simpson then introduced and prefaced each Department's budget presentation giving its location in the Budget Document and Capital improvement Plan where applicable, and budget totals. He also noted those Departments where policy issues needed to be addressed. The following Department Heads then gave a brief overview of their Department's accomplishments over the past year, their plans and goals for the coming year(s) and/or an explanation relative to their proposed budget requirements for 1988-89 as well as addressing policy issues if applicable: Stadium General Manager, Greg Smith - Anaheim Stadium: RAP Pages 42-43. Capital Improvement Plan (1988/89), Pages 45-46. Operating budget total, $21,585,136. Capital Improvements, $225,000. Total $21,813,126. Issue: Establishment of appropriate reserves for long-term rehabilitation and maintenance requirements. Public Utilities General Manager, Gordon Hoyt - Public Utilities Department: RAP Pages 52-57. Capital improvement Plan, Pages 47-64. Operating budget total, $217,584,968. Capital Improvements, ~55,104,238. Total, $272,~89,205. No issues. No adjustments. Mr. Hoyt also explained that staff is supportive of the Public Utilities Board's recommendation that $250,000 be expended for preliminary Engineering studies to underground facilities in the Disneyland/C0nvention Center area estimated to cost $18 million. Department would like to spend the greatest part of this year determining what the impacts will be on their customers. They anticipate the Council will want to form an Underground District which will require participation not only by the City, but also Edison, the Telephone Company, Cable Company - anyone who has overhead facilities. He believes undergrounding will be a great asset to the community. The Mayor Bay. He is in favor of the proposed study. He emphasized, however, that relative to undergrounding in the commercial/recreation area, he does not want to see every utility user in the City pay to underground that area. He would like to look at some alternatives of possibly special districts where the undergrounding will take place and the people in that district who will benefit from the undergrounding will pay for it. 645 ?l City Hall, Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988~ 1:30 P.M. Golf Operations Manaser (Interim), Dave Morsan - Golf Operations - Anaheim Hills and "Dad" Miller Courses: RAP Pages 40-41. Capital Improvement Plan, Page 46. Operating budget total, $3,225,834. Capital Improvements, 51,910,000. Total, 55,135,834. One issue: Sale of 20 acres of surplus land on the south side of Nohl Ranch Road to finance channel stabilization improvements and the development of the Anaheim Hills Course parking lot. (Mr. Morgan's presentation was supplemented by slides). Director of Maintenance, John Roche - Department of Maintenance: RAP Pages 44-47. No Capital Improvement Projects. Operating budget total, $35,800,3§1. No issues. Adjustments: An increase of $64,8i0 for cost of collecting municipal ordinance violations offset by $83,134 in additional violations collections. After adjustments - total $35,685,171. Plannin$ Director, Joel Fick - Piannin~ Department: RAP Pages 48-51. No Capital Improvement Projects. Operating budget total, 54,146,254. No issues. No adjustments. Chief of Police, Joseph T. Molloy - Police Department: RAP Pages 22-25. Capital Improvement Plan, Page 18. Operating budget total, $37,750,027. Issues: Increased debt service on Police 2000 without offsetting revenues necessitates the reduction of services. Adjustments: Increase of $243,286 in revenues and 514~,006 in expenses due to City assuming responsibility for collection of municipal ordinance violations. Decreased revenues and expense by $30,641 due to timing and size of State property crime grab for a store front operation. New total, $37,867,392. Data Processin~ Director, Phil Grammatica - Data Processing Department: RAP Page 68. No Capital Improvement Projects. Operating budget total, 54,068,516. No issues. No adjustments. Finance Director, George Ferrone - Finance Department: RAP Page 67. No Capital Improvement Projects. Operating budget total, $3,334,625. No issues. No adjustments. At the conclusion of the foregoing Departmental budget presentations, City Mamager Simpson stated that the Council has received as part of its agenda packet staff's response to the Chamber of Commerce Blue Ribbon Committee Report (see report - City of Anaheim - Response to the Chamber of Commerce Blue Ribbon Committee Report - 1988/89 Resource Allocation Plan). There is no substantial difference of opinion between that report and the budget submitted. The budget reflects that staff intends to cooperate fully and put into practice as many of the Committee's recommendations as practicable and work to the best interest of the City. There is a continuing relationship with that Committee. 646 City Hall, A~_aheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Bay. He read the document thoroughly and does not see any major differences or issues. What he senses is not only cross pollination and information going on between the public and private sector, but, in his veiw, they are helping each other by their communication lines. For the first year since he has been on the Council he is not having to make a speech about why the City is not doing what the people are asking be done. WAIVER OF READING -RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 88K-246) Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 88R-246 for adoption, adopting the annual appropriations limit of $115,437,265 for the fiscal year 1988/89. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 88K-246: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL YEAR1988/89. Koll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88K-246 duly passed and adopted. 105: COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD PRESENTATION: Mr. Bryan Crow, Chairman, Community Services Board (CSB) briefed his zeport dated May 17, 1988 recommending that the Council approve a Fiscal Year 1988/~9 Community Services Agency funding level of $152,170 (report made a part of the record - accompanied by a large booklet entitled, Community Service Agencies Funding Applications Fiscal Year 19~8/89). Attached to the subject report was a funding request comparison chart covering the years 1986/87, 1987/88 and 1988/89. This year funding requests (applications) were received from 14 agencies. Considerable time and effort was spent by the Board and the Sub-Committee chafed by June Lowry. Ultimately each Agency's recommended funding level was approved unanimously by the Community Services Board at its meeting of May 12, 1988. Mayor Bay. He first thanked Chairman Crow and the Board and Sub-Commlttee for the time and effort expended on a difficult process. He continued that for a number of years, he has attempted to start a move to sunset community services funding coming from the City's General Fund. He has been proposing a 3-year reduction funding so that at the end of that period, the City will no longer be involved in funding charitable organizations which he feels involves government in welfare. He thereupon moved the following: 647 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. That the City fund the Community Services Agencies for 1988/89, with no change to the proposed ratios as recommended by the Community Services Board Sub-Committee, a maximum limit of $100,000 vs. the recommended $152,170, limiting the 1989/90 total funding to $50,000, and for Fiscal Year 1990/91 that it be reduced to zero. Before further action was taken, Mayor Bay stated he feels his motion will take the City out of the social welfare business. It has been done by the County and other agencies. He is not going to reiterate his philosophical argument which the Council has heard before in past years at this time. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion for the purpose of discussion. Councilman Hunter. The monies to support the agencies come right out of the City's General Fund. His understanding is that even the County is looking very closely at funds coming directly from taxpayers of the County. By allowing $100,000 this year and sunsetting the matter in three years, the sources of revenue for these various organizations can be looked at in other areas other than the General Fund. Councilman Pickler expressed his disagreement ~ith the Mayor on the issue in general. He also felt it was unfair if there was going to be a sunsetting on funding, the recommendations of the Community Services Board for this year should remain at the $152,170 level. Some of the programs are vitally needed and the Council cannot walk away from what he feels is their responsibility. Councilman Ehrle. He first explained his involvement and experiences in the past working with the Human Services Advisory Board for the County. He agrees they have to do something to help the needy but what he learned quickly was the best way to do so was to help make them self sufficient and independent. He gave examples of two organizations with which he worked and where this was accomplished by assisting them in getting the private and corporate sector involved in their programs. In his opinion, if they can raise $300,000 or $400,000 amongst them for campaigns in the private sector, they can assist the Community Services Agencies in raising the funds they need. He was, however, thinking of a different ratio than the one proposed by the Mayor. Councilman Pickler. He recommended that the Council postpone the matter for a week instead of making a hasty decision involving the well-being of the many worthwhile agencies. He thereupon moved that a decision on the 1988/89 Community Services Agency Funding be continued for one week. Councilwoma~ Kaywood seconded the motion. Before action was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood stated, in her opinion, if the City does not fund the agencies, it will result in tripling of Police services and other services that the City will have to then provide. Mayor Bay. They will not be wiping out the funding but merely trimming it to $100,000 for this year and $50,000 for the following year. He tried to start a sunsetting percentage five years ago recommending a 20% reduction each year. A vote was then taken on the motion to continue the matter for one week and failed to carry by the following vote: 648 City ~l 1, A~__aheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL M~MBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood and Pickler Ehrle, Hunter and Bay None After further discussion between Council Members on the issue, Chairman Crow suggested that the funding be set at last year's level on $124,471. He would then call a special board meeting to let the agencies know of the new figure and that funding was going to be sunsetted on a basis determined by the Council. In that way, they would be creating a somewhat less difficult hardship on everyone. He also personally feels the private sector needs to be involved to assist in funding these agencies. Shirley Cohen, Executive Director, Feedback Foundation. Prior City Councils and staff were concerned about seniors in Anaheim and asked their Foundation if they could also serve evening and Sunday meals to seniors. The Council said they would pay for it. If the Council does not now fund their program, they cannot provide those meals and will cut back. As an alternative, she suggested that Councilman Ehrle could possibly raise the money from the private sector. Cutbacks are very devastating not only to the agencies but directly to the people. Mayor Bay. He is going to call for tbm question on the floor since he is not going to listen to everything the Committee has listened to in making their recommendations. Dagberto Zavala, Central American Services of Anaheim. Their organization had approached the City in March relative to Block Grant funding. The people they are trying to help are a community of refugees not legally recognized and deprived of services available in the County. Now he is hearing the possibility of cutbacks in Community Services which will further diminish their chances of being funded on this important prevention project. If money is not spent on these types of programs in the future, money will have to be spent on police enforcement instead. If there is to be sunsetting of funding, the City Council should be involved in setting up a network of private organizations that might be able to assist and help do the job that is necessary. They have not been able to get their project off the ground as yet. It is estimated that they would need $60,000 to start but are willing to settle on whatever the Council would decide. Sharon Phelps, Director, Retired Senior Volunteer Program (RSVP). The RSVP program gives back to the community and helps seniors stay involved and dedicated to the community. Last year the seniors gave $126,432 to the City in volunteer hours alone considered at minimum wage. The RSVP program was cut 40% last year. Her program cannot live with any more cuts. Some Council Members offered help to her last year but that has not happened. She does not know how to get this help. Councilman Hunter. He suggested instead that the funding be $150,000 this year, $100,000 the following year, $50,000 the year after that and zero in the fourth year. That would give organizations such as RSVP ample opportunity 649 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21~ 1988~ 1:30 P.M. over four years to go out and start looking more into the private sector and other areas vs. monies coming out of the City's General Fund; Councilman Pickler stated that he could go along with Councilman Hunter's suggestion. Councilman Hunter moved that the Council adopt the recommended Community Services Agency Funding level of $150,000 for Fiscal Year 1988/89 but that such funding be sunsetted in the next fiscal year to a maximum of $100,000, the following year to a maximum of $50,000, and in the fourth year that Community Services Agency Funding be reduced to zero. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Mayor Bay stated that the amendment would then change the ratio as follows: 5150,000, 1988/89; 5100,000, 1989/90; 550,000, 1990/91 and zero, 1991/92. Mayor Bay called for a vote on the motion; it was indicated from the audience that there may be additional people who wish to speak. Mayor Bay left the Council Chamber (5:50 p.m.). June Lowry, Chairman of the Community Services Board Sub-Committee asked for clarification on how the Committee will then handle requests in the coming years - whether it would be on a percentage basis, allocating a certain percentage of the 5100,000 to each of the agencies who apply; Councilman Pickler stated that the funds would still be allocated to the agencies as the Community Services Board had done in the past. Mrs. Lowry surmised then that, for example, if 20 agencies applied, the requests would all be weighed on their merits and monies allocated up to the 5100,000 limit and the 550,000 limit; Councilman Pickier confirmed that was correct. Councilman Ehrle then proposed an amendment to the motion that this year the Community Services Agencies be funded the recommended amount of $152,170 and that amount be reduced by 25% each year for the next four years which would result in funding for one additional year: 1988/89, $152,170; 1989/90, 5114,127.50; 1990/90, $76,085; 1991/92, $38,042.50 and 1992/93 zero funds allocated. A vote was then taken on the motion as amended that the 1988/89 Community Services Agency Funding request of $152,170 be approved and that amount be reduced by 25% each year for the next four years as indicated above. Councilwoman Kaywood voted no. Councilman Bay was absent. MOTION CARRIED. Cour. ctlwoman Kaywood voted no on the basis that the motion will not be productive just on the fact alone that $126,432 in senior volunteer hours was given to the City last year. Before concluding, Marsha Vickery, Executive Director, Orange County Center for Health asked to speak and stated that Councilman ~hrle's previous comment about fund-raising was one of the most exciting sue has heard. It is a fact that political representatives can get money that community agencies will 650 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 21, 1988, 1:30 P.M. never see. If the people in Anaheim as part of their fund-raising campaign set aside some of that money and gave it to the Community Services Board an organization with a high level of integrity, to add to the "pot", this might be something that could be very well publicized. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Hunter moved to adjourn. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. Councilman Bay was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (5:55 p.m.) ANN M. SAUVAGEAU, 651