1988/07/19191
City Hall, A~aheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickier and Bay
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Bob Simpson
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Annika Santaiahti
SENIOR PLANNER: Lucy Yeager
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 2:15 p.m. on July 15, 1988 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all
items as shown herein.
Mayor Bay called the meeting~to order at 12:05 p.m.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Jack White requested a Closed
Session to consider the following items:
a. To confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball
Co. vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No.
40-92-46; City of Anaheim vs. Anaheim Hotel Partnership, O.C.S.C.C.
No. 46-96-59.
b. To discuss labor relations matters - Government Code Section
54957.6.
c. To discuss personnel matters - Government Code Section 54957.
d. To confer with its Attorney regarding potential litigation
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1).
e. To consider such other matters as are orally announced by the
City Attorney, City Manager or City Council prior to such recess
unless the motion to recess indicates any of the matters will not be
considered in Closed Session.
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present, and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting.
(2:37 p.m.)
INVOCATION: Dr. Ernest Furness, Anaheim Adventist Church, gave the invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: PRESENTATION - INTRODUCTION OF NEW CITY EMPLOYEES: City Clerk Leonora
Sohl stated that there are a number of employees participating in the new
717
192
City Mmll, Anmheim, Cmlffornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
orientation program who are present in the Chamber audience. At the second
meeting of each month, new employees will be introduced and after their names
are announced, will be asked to stand and remain standing until all have been
introduced.
At the conclusion of announcing the names of the new employees they were
welcomed by the City Council.
119: PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Bay and
authorized by the City Council:
Export Now Week in Anaheim, August 1, 1988.
MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the meeting
held June 21, i988. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $4,899,9i9.74, in
accordance with the i988-~9 Budget, were approved.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS AND ORDINANCE: The titles of the following
resolutions and ordinance on the Consent Calendar were read by the City
Manager. (Resolution Nos. 88K-282 through 88K-286, both inclusive, and
Ordinance No. 4940)
Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions and
ordinance. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CAKKIED.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pickier, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilwoman Kaywood
offezed Resolution Nos. 88K-282 through 88R-286, both inclusive, and Ordinance
No. 4940, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
Al. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken
as recommended:
a. Claim submitted by Greg Gaumer for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about June 15, 1988.
b. Claim submitted by Melissa Osborne for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 19, 1988.
c. Claim submitted by Eric Goodman for bodily injuries sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 10, i988.
A2. 173: Receiving and filing correspondence from Sam A. Shirokawa and
Roberta J. Shirokawa, dba Galaxy Transportation Services, pertaining to the
filing of an application with the Public Utilities Commission to operate as a
Passenger Stage in Orange County.
718
189
Clty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
City Clerk Sohl confirmed for Councilwoman Kaywood such applications are
placed on the agenda to allow local transportation companies to be aware of
them. Those companies do get a copy of the agenda on a weekly basis.
A3. 164: Awarding a contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder,
Changing Times Enterprises, in the amount of $89,472 for Timken Road Sewer
Improvement, 1050 ' E/O Mohler Drive to Mohler Drive.
A4. 167: Awarding a contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder, Paul
Gardner Corporation, in the amount of $190,9b0 for Federal Demonstration
Project #1 - System Detectors for the Traffic System.
AS. 158: Authorizing the payment of $120,630 to William C. Taormina and
Cynthia L. Taormina for modifications to their building located at 910 North
Anaheim Boulevard for the North Anaheim Boulevard Street Widening Project -
R/W 3500-69.
A6. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-282: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAN PUBLIC STREETS, EASEMENTS AND/OR FACILITIES
HERETOFORE IRREVOCABLY OFFERED FOR DEDICATION. (Accepting a certain
irrevocable offer of dedication for street and public utility purposes and
facilities at Hunter Avenue and Hancock Street as shown on Parcel Map 87-302)
A7. 170/123: Approving the Final Map of Tract No. 13129 and the Subdivision
Agreement with Centra Development Corporation. Tract No. 13129 is located
east of Lakeview Avenue, South of Orchard Drive to Hightree Circle.
AS. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-283: ARESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESS~IENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1984-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1988 TO JUNE 30, i989, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT NOS. 1453,
1401, 1400, 1375, 335 AND 217) (Levying an assessment of $20.49 on each lot
and parcel of land contained in Street Lighting Maintenance District 1984-1
for the contract year July 1, 1988, to June 30, i989, to improve the street
lighting system for such ensuing contract year.
AY. 123/129: RESOLUTION NO. 8~R-284: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CONFIRMING THE WRITTEN REPORT OF THE FIRE CHIEF R~GA~DING
THE COST OF WEED ABATEMENT AND DIRECTING THE FILING THEREOF WITH THE COUNTY OF
ORANGE. (Accepting the written report of the Fire Chief confirming the cost
of weed abatement incurred during the i987-1988 weed abatement contract with
Edwin Webber, Inc., and directing that this report be submitted to the County
Assessor's office)
Al0. 160: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent to
issue a purchase order without competitive bidding to Wang Laboratories, in an
amount not to exceed $165,000 to cover maintenance contract costs for ali Wang
equipment City-wide.
All. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-285: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING DATED JUNE 15, 1988,
719
190
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988~ 1:30 P.M.
BETWEEN THE ANAHEIM POLICE ASSOCIATION AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Approving a
Letter of Understanding dated June 15, 1988, with the AnaHeim Police
Association amending the Memorandum of Understanding, Article 44, pertaining
to general overtime)
Al2. 123/153: ORDINANCE NO. 4940: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AUTHORIZING AN AMENDMENT TO THE CONTRACT BETWEEN THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIMAND THE BOARD OF ADMINISTRATION OF THE CALIFO~qIA PUBLIC EMPLOYEES'
RETIREMENT SYSTEM. (Authorizing an amendment to the contract with the Board
of Administration of the California Public Employee's Retirement System to
reclassify the Jailer and Senior Jailer classifications from local
miscellaneous to local safety status and to provide the Third Level of 19~9
Survivor Benefits)
Al3. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 88R-286: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES OR INTERESTS THEREIN.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 88R-282 through 88R-286:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 88R-282 through 88R-286, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
End of Consent Calendar. MOTIONS CARRIED.
106/108: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO TITLE 3 AND
TITLE 4 - BUSINESS LICENSES~ AMUSEMENT DEVICES AND HALLOWEEN PAKADEAND
FESTIVAL: Submitted was report dated July 14, 1988 from the City Treasurer,
recommending that the Council approve the proposed tax methodology as stated
in the report and directing the City Attorney to prepare a revised ordinance
based upon this new methodology for first reading at the Council meeting of
July 26, 1988. Further, a proposed increase of appropriations to Account
NO. 01-156-5115 for F.Y. 1988/89 of $100,000 to cover costs associated with
implementing the new business license ordinance will be acted upon at the time
ordinances are adopted.
This item was discussed and continued from the meeting of June 14, 1988, to
this date.
City Treasurer, Mary Turner. The report submitted to the City Council
indicates that staff has met with the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce and the
Chamber has concurred, in concept, with the City staff recommendation of the
tax methodology (see letter dated July 12, 1988 from Larry Slagle, President,
Anaheim Chamber of Commerce).
Mayor Bay asked if anyone wished to speak to the proposed amendments to the
Business License Ordinance, there being no response, he closed the public
hearing.
720
187
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to direct the City Attorney to prepare
ordinances amending Titles 3 and 4.
li4: NO QUORUMANTICIPATED FOR THE COUNCIL MEETING OF AUGUST 2, 1988: City
Clerk Sobl announced that there is a possibility there will be no quorum for
the Council meeting of August 2, 1988 since Council Members Pickier and Hunter
will not be present. This is being brought forward at this time in order to
properly schedule public hearings and prepare legal advertising. It should
also be determined if there is no meeting on August 2, 1988, which is the
regularly scheduled night meeting being the first Tuesday of the month,
whether the meeting of August 9, 1988 will be a day or night meeting.
It was determined that a Council quorum is not anticipated for the August 2,
1988 meeting and that the meeting of August 9, 1988 will be a scheduled day
meeting.
142/127: PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY CHARTER: To discuss potential
changes to City Charter to be placed on November i988 ballot. This matter was
discussed at the meetings of May 31, June 7, June 14, June 21, June 28 and
July 12, 1988, and continued to this date. Submitted today are proposed
resolutions setting forth a Charter amendment for submission to the voters at
the General Municipal Election to be held November 8, 1988 relating to the
direct election of the Mayor and technical "housekeeping" changes.
Councilman Pickler. Relative to the amendment to remove the provision for
direct election of the Mayor, he is suggesting that the Council rescind its
action and not put that issue on the ballot at this time. It may be confusing
to the electorate. Further, approximately 29 state-wide initiatives or
measures will be on the November, 1988 ballot along with City issues which are
enough for the electorate to contend with.
Councilman Pickler moved to withdraw the Proposed Charter Amendment to Revise
Section 504 of the Charter removing the provisions for direct election of the
Mayor and that the issue not be placed on the November, 1988 ballot.
Councilman Hunter seconded the motion.
Mayor Bay. He confirmed that the intent is to withdraw the proposed
resolution on the direct election of the Mayor as well as the resolution which
would have set priorities for filing written arguments for that measure.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion and carried unanimously.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS: The title of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 88R-287 and 88K-288)
Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 88K-287 for adoption, setting forth a
Charter amendment for submission to the voters at the General Municipal
Election to be held November 8, 1988. (Technical "housekeeping" issues.)
Refer to Resolution Book.
721
City Hall, Anmheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988~ 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 88R-287: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM SETTING FORTH A CHARTER AMENDMENT FOR SUBMISSION TO THE VOTERS AT THE
GENERAL MUNICIPALELECTION TO BE HELD NOVEMBER 8, 1988.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickier and Bay
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-287 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 88R-288 for adoption, setting priorities
for filing written arguments regarding a City measure and directing the City
Attorney to prepare an Impartial Analysis. (Regarding technical
"housekeeping" issues.) Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 8~R-288: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM SETTING PRIORITIES FOR FILING WRITTEN ARGUMENTS REGARDING A CITY
MEASURE AND DIRECTING THE CITY ATTORNEY TO PREPARE AN IMPARTIAL ANALYSIS.
Before a vote was taken, Council discussion followed with input by the City
Clerk wherein it was determined that the five Council Members will write and
sign the written argument on the "housekeeping" issues and that t~m City
Attorney will prepare an impartial analysis relative to the measure.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolution:
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-289 duly passed and adopted.
114/127/137/173/134: BOND MEASURE TO SUPPORT THE CRITICAL INTERSECTION PLAN:
Request by Mayor Bay to discuss the possibility of placing a bond measure to
support the proposed critical intersection plan on the November 19~8 ballot.
This matter was discussed at, and continued from the meeting of May 3i, 1988,
to this date.
Councilman Bay moved to direct the City Attorney to prepare the necessary
documentation to place a $30 million Bond Issue on the November, 1988 ballot
related to the concept of the critical intersection plan. Councilwoman
Kaywood seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, Mayor Bay stated that the public hearing on the
critical intersection plan was ~ontinued to the meeting of July 26, 1988. He
does not mean to preclude differences of opinion on the final vote on the plan
by offering the present motion. The July 26, 1988 hearing, however, pertains
to 24 additional intersections whereas nine 9 have previously been voted on
722
185
City Mall, Anaheim, (%lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
and approved. Placing a $30 million Bond Issue on the ballot which will
require a 2/3's vote of the people to pass will undoubtedly elicit public
input.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the bond issue will not affect those critical
intersections already approved.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. MOTION CARRIED UN~IIMOUSLY.
179/149: PARKING ORDINANCE PERTAINING TO CONVENIENCE MARKETS: Councilwoman
Kaywood referred to letter dated June 17, 1988 from the Planning Commission
Chairman, Bob Messe, urging the Council to reconsider the parking ordinance
pertaining to convenience markets which was not adopted by the Council. (See
minutes of May 31, 1988 where the issue was discussed and a vote taken on
Ordinance No. 4930 but which failed to carry). As indicated i~ the letter,
"prior to convenience markets introducing meal-type hot foods, our parking
standards considered the people would park, purchase and depart." It is an
entirely different situation now as further pointed out that since the
introduction of hot dogs, hamburgers, chili, etc. people park and subsequently
consume the food in their vehicles which has created a difficult problem
relative to parking and circulation. The Planning Commission is proposing
that five additional parking spaces be required for any such application, not
five spaces per 1,000 square feet.
Councilwoman Kaywood moved to change the parking ordinance for convenience
markets accordingly. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator, clarified
for Councilman Pickler that staff concurs with the Planning Commission
recommendation particularly after Traffic Engineering did their field
observations. It would pertain only when a convenience market plans to have
the service of hot food on the premises. A convenience market that does not
do that will not be required to have extra parking.
Councilman Pickler. He favors the proposed change since he frequents many of
the mini markets and has observed considerable congestion especially since the
advent of these markets selling hot foods. The City is being inundated with
convenience markets and if they have to come back to obtain a parking waiver,
it will be possible to know the locations.
City Attorney White. The ordinance is already prepared since it is the same
ordinance previously presented to the Council but now requested to be
reconsidered. The ordinance originally prepared does reflect the discussion
thus far and he does not believe that the ordinance needs to be revised in any
way. The ordinance can be introduced today. It will not be retroactive.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4946 for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4946: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING AND AMENDING
VARIOUS SECTIONS AND SUBSECTIONS OF VARIOUS CHAPTERS OF TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING REQUIREMENTS AND DEFINITIONS OF
CONVENIENCE MARKETS.
723
186
City H-11, Ansheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
City Attorney White. This ordinance, if adopted next week, will take effect
30 days thereafter. Any projects either in existence or which have received a
building permit and commenced construction would be vested prior to the
effective date of the ordinance and would not be subject to the provisions of
the proposed ordinance. Any new project if not built, but has a building
permit, would have to follow the provisions of the new ordinance. The Council
could require this as part of the conditional use permit when the applicant
comes to the City between now and the effective date of the ordinance.
Mayor Bay. He is concerned with those already approved but which do not have
their permits and then get caught in the change.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator. She believes there are two or three
at the moment in this situation but will have to check with the Building
Division.
Mayor Bay. This is only the first reading of the ordinance today with the
second reading scheduled for next week, July 26, 1988, where any public input
will be heard at that time for anyone who wishes to speak for or against the
proposed ordinance.
City Attorney White. He asked if the Council would like him to also have an
alternate ordinance that would exempt out projects in process if upon checking
there are more projects involved than thought to be; Mayor Bay stated that
would be a good idea.
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST:
Bill Erickson, 301 East North Street. As he sits through the Council
meetings, he hears complaints from citizens who cannot near what is being
said. He feels the citizens should have the courtesy of all Council Members
to speak into the microphone during Council meetings in order to eliminate
those complaints.
Sonja Grewal. As a member of the Anaheim Hills Citizens Coalition she has
received a phone call from a person asking how a potentially dangerous fire
hazard could be eliminated quickly. She made an inquiry and found that the
area the caller was speaking about had not been watered for over a year. She
suggested that the caller come to speak to the Council today.
Elaine Siiverstein. She is not a resident of Anaheim but is reporting on a
condition that is existing in a beautiful open space area where trees and
wildlife are dying due to lack of water. A state of emergency exists in the
Olive Hills Park area located south of Nohl Canyon Road east of Tustin Avenue
in Anaheim which is used by hikers, walkers and people who love nature. It
has been in existence for approximately 20 years. For some reason it has not
been watered. She has a petition with approximately i00 signatures gathered
in only 12 hours appealing for water, noting that immediate action is
necessary to preserve the area which has not been maintained for many months
and is in an extreme drougt condition constituting not only a fire hazard, but
also has caused trees, animals and other vegetation to die.
724
183
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
Sonia Grewal. She has called Dick Mayer in the City's Park Department who
said that the area had not been watered for approximately a year because a
sprinkler had been cut due to a contractor above the area was doing some
work. He did not know when the sprinkler system would be reconnected.
Mrs. Silverstein emphasized that immediate action, within a day or two, is
necessary or it will be too late.
Mayor Bay. He referred the matter to the City Manager to determine exactly
where the area is in the status of the situation and that Mrs. Silverstein
give her name, address and telephone number to the City Clerk; City Manager
Simpson stated that he will have staff look into the matter immediately.
James Bonsteel, 123 North Groton. He asked that each page of documents he
presents to the City Clerk's Office be stamped in indicating the date and time
received.
City Attorney White. The City's normal procedure is to stamp in the cover
page only of documents received for filing. He is not in a position to have
the City Clerk stamp every page. He suggested an alternative that Mr.
Bonsteel make a duplicate copy and initial each page submitted - the one he
submits and the one he keeps.
Mayor Bay. He suggested that Mr. Bonsteel consider the alternative suggestion
but otherwise the whole system was not going to be changed because he
(Bonsteel) disagreed with it.
RECESS: By general consent the Council recessed for ten minutes. (3:30 p.m.)
AFTEK RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (3:50 p.m.)
179: PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-54, CONOITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 3016 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT:
George F. Hexter
55 S. Market Street, #1500,
San Jose, CA 95113
AGENTS:
Wayne Banks, Wayne Banks and Associates, Inc.
19100 VonKarman, Suite 260,
Irvine, CA 92715
Mr. T. Fuller, M. S. Partnership
1634 E. Adams Avenue,
Orange, CA 92715
LOCATION/REQUEST: The property is located at 2201 W. Lincoln Avenue. The
request is for a change in zone from RS-A-43,000 to CL or a less intense zone,
and to permit a 6,259 square-foot, 5-unit commercial retail center.
725
City Hall, Anaheim, Cm]~fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Resolution No. PC88-146 granted Reclassification
No. 87-88-54, Resolution No. PC88-147 granted Conditional Use Permit No. 3016;
approved EIR Negative Declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilman
Pickler and Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of June 28, 1988, and public
hearing scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin July 7, 1988.
Posting of property July 8, 1988.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - July 8, i988.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated June 6, 198~.
COUNCIL CONCERNS:
Councilman Pickler.
He wants to know what type of retail stores are bein~ planned
for the Center and if the location is one of the critical
intersections. His main concern is traffic and circulation and
whether the corner can absorb the type of traffic that would be
generated by this development. He lives nearby and is very
familiar with the location. Lincoln and Brookhurst are very
heavily traveled streets.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator.
She confirmed for Councilman Pickler that this location is not
on the list of critical intersections.
Wayne Banks, 19100 Von Karman, Suite 260, Irvine, CA 92715.
At present no stores are assigned or leased. These will be
speculative retail buildings. There will be five stores. He
has spent a great deal of time working with staff. There were
four points of access to the current site and those have been
reduced to two and they are as far away from the intersection as
possible. Traffic and circulation onsite meets with Traffic
Engineering approval whlch was aequirad before the development
was submitted to Planning.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator.
Answering Councilman Pickler, she explained the proposal would
not accommodate any food service whatsoever. One of the
conditions recommended by the Planning Commission specifically
stated that no food facilities would be permitted unless a
variance is obtained.
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Food service is not the only kind of high parking use. Anything
medical would also generate a high parking need and they are not
listed as being prohibited.
726
181
City Hall, Annheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M....
Annika Santalahti.
Thirty-four spaces are required and 35 are being provided based
on the retail requirement of 5.5 spaces per 1,000 square feet.
Restaurants require more parking and another less common is
medical offices which is 6 parking spaces per 1,000 square
feet. If Council approves this, they may wish to modify
Condition No. 4 to prohibit medical offices as well unless a
variance is sought and granted. It would have to be done at
this time.
Mayor Bay.
He does not see a reason for including exceptions. There are
certain uses that meet the Code for 34 parking spaces. Anything
outside of that will require the applicant to come back and ask
for a change.
Mayor Bay opened the public hearing and asked if anyone wisi~ed to speak either
in favor or in opposition; there being no response, he closed the public
hearing.
Councilman Pickler stated his questions and concerns had been answered.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Pickler, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. MOTION CAR/LIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS: The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 88R-289 and 88R-290)
Councilman Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler offered Resolution No. 88R-289 for adoption, approving
Reclassification No. 87-88-54 and Resolution No. 8SR-290 for adoption,
granting Conditional Use Permit No. 3016, both subject to City Planning
Commission conditions. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 88R-289: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APFROV£NG RECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-54.
RESOLUTION NO. 88R-290: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAM~±M ~KANTAN~ ~UNO±~£ONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3016.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MF~4BERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickier and Bay
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
727
182
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988~ 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 88R-289 and 88R-290 duly passed and adopted.
179: PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 3790AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT: OWNER:
Joseph M. Urias
1224 E. Katella Avenue,
Orange, CA 92667
LOCATION/REQUEST: The property is located at 2i3 South Ohio Street, Anaheim.
The request is for waivers of (a) minimum building site area per dwelling unit
and (b) maximum structural height to construct a 3-story 6-unit apartment
building.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Resolution No. PC88-i40 denied Variance No. 3790;
approved EIR - Negative Declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
Appeal of tbm decision of the Planning Commission was filed by Joseph M.
Urias, and public hearing scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin July 7, 1988.
Posting of property July 8, 1988.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - July 8, 198~.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated June 6, i98~.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Joseph M. Urias, 1224 E. Katella Avenue, Orange, CA 9Z~67.
He originally proposed a 3-story, 6-unit apartment building on a
lot 46.5 feet wide x 155 feet deep giving approximately 7,207.5
square feet of buildabie land which has been zoned RM-i200 since
1951. This will allow six apartments to be built. However,
because of the location of the lot in relation to the alley ways
on the west and south side of the property, the City guidelines
would deduct lU feet from the south and west side of the
property or 50 square feet §ivin~ approximately 7,157 square
feet buildable land puttin~ him in the predicament he is in now
or 8 feet short of the RM-1200 Code for a 6-unit project. The
initial proposal was for six units, five 3-bedroom, 2-bath
units and a one 1-bedroom 2-bath unit. After the May 9, 19S~
presentation to the Planning Commission, there was considerable
opposition to the project at which point he asked for a
continuance to hear the complaints and concerns of the
neighbors. He subsequently submitted revised plans deducting
one bedroom from each unit giving five 2-bedroom units with a
den and the 1-bedroom 2-bath unit. To eliminate the concerns of
the neighbors to the south regarding intrusion, the revised
plans enclosed the south facing patios. He has tried, with the
best of intentions to answer ail concerns and to submit a viable
project that will be of benefit to the neighborhood and the City.
728
179
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCILMINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN FAVOR: None.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN OPPOSITION:
Susan Kocsis, 206 South Ohio.
She is asking that City laws and ordinances be enforced. She is
not against ali development but it should be built according to
Code in order to protect the people already living in the
neighborhood and that it be preserved as much as is left of it.
The applicant is asking for six units when only five are
allowed. Dens are livable as bedrooms. The 3-stories are
distressing. The applicant put the balconies back in that he
took out after the first meeting which will result in visual
intrusion. There are i-story single family residences in the
area. The Planning Commission turned down the project twice
unanimously.
Michael Kowalski, 825 West Broadway.
There are 18 residents who completely surround the property
opposed to two specific things - the requested amount of
coverage for the building and the height needed for the
structure. It is expected what is built on the property be
built to Code. There are no recognizable hardships that require
a variance. After reading excerpts from the Planning Commission
meeting, he asked that the Council agree with the Commission and
vote unanimously against the requested variances.
Marian Harvey, 212 South Illinois.
She is concerned that the Code is being abused. The Council
cannot allow this project to vary to the extent the applicant is
requesting relative to height, the number of units and the
density. She cannot live with this change.
Joe White, 801 West Broadway.
He is opposed to tandem parking. It does not work.
Subsequently the street is used for parking. They are not
against pro~ress, but against variances and granting waivers of
any kind.
SUMMATION BY APPLICANT: Mr. Urias.
He showed a plot map of the area to show his property in
comparison to the rest of the neighborhood. He noted that the
properties with yellow dots were granted various Code changes.
He emphasized and reiterated the fact that there have been
several projects granted the variances he is requesting. If
denied, it is depriving his property of the same privileges that
have been recently granted and which are being enjoyed by the
adjoining property and others in the identical zone and
classification. (Also see Mr. Urias's, "Letter of Appeal and
Request for a Fair and impartial Review of Plans" dated June 15,
729
180
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
1988 -made a part of the record). He is trying to build a
project that is financially feasible and should be given the
opportunity to do so the same as the other properties. The
project will not be financially possible to build if he is
required to build strictly to Code. He would also be willing to
declare one of the units affordable which would bring his
property to the same status as the property adjacent to him
which was allowed to build a similar project.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Bay closed the public hearing.
COUNCIL CONCERNS:
Councilwoman Kaywood.
The type of overwhelming density approved one after another has
changed the quality of life in the area. The fact that a
similar project was approved next door without a hardship does
not mean it is okay for the next person. She felt Mr. Urias in
his presentation actually gave reasons not to approve any
additional density wherein he cited problems his tenants have
had being broken into since the new apartments were constructed
next to him.
Mayor Bay.
Some of the applicant's arguments were good ones, but he
personally could not vote for the development based on maximum
site coverage. He cannot agree to a 74% maximum site coverage
(55% permitted) especially when all the surrounding neighbors
are adamantly opposed to what the applicant wants to do.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Pickler, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
t~at there is no substantial evidence that the project will nave a significant
effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - R~§0LUTION: The title of the following resolution was
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 88R-291)
Councilman Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler offered Resolution No. 88R-291 for adoption, denying
Variance No. 3790, upholding the findings of the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 88R-291: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 88R-29i.
730
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-291 duly passed and adopted.
179: PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-51, VARIANCE NO. 3797 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT: OWNERS:
Spiros Giannotsos and Catherine Giannotsos
1469 Alabama Avenue,
Pittsburgh, PA 152i6
AGENT:
Massoud Monshizadeh
1524 Victoria Way
Placentia, CA 92670
LOCATION/REQUEST: The property is located at 755 N. East Street. The request
is for waivers of (a) maximum structural height, (b) minimum front yard
setback and (c) minimum side yard setback to construct a 2-story, 5-unit
apartment building.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Resolution No. PC88-134 granted Reclassification
No. 87-88-51; approved EIR - Negative Declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilwoman
Kaywood at the meeting of June 14, 1988.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin July 7, 1988.
Posting of property July 8, 1988.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - July 8, i988.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated May 23, 1988.
Councilman Ehrle announced that he has a potential conflict of interest in
this matter since he has a business relationship with the agent in another
City on another project.
Councilman Ehrle left tt~ Council Chambers. (4:38 p.m.)
APPLICANT'S
STAT~.~NT:
Dr. Ronald Crowley.
He requested that the request for the reclassification and
variance be terminated. They have recently acquired five
additional parcels contiguous to the subject parcel and have
before the Planning staff at this time two projects - a
731
City Hall, A~mheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
condominium and an apartment project which will replace the
subject development. There is no need to either obtain the
reclassification or the variance at this time.
City Attorney White.
Legally the Council has to open and subsequently close the
public hearing. Since the hearing has been noticed, it is
necessary to take that action. It does not prejudice the
applicant to deny the reclassification variance with regard to
any additional applications in the future.
Mayor Bay asked if anyone wished to speak either in favor or in opposition;
there was no response.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Bay closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Bay, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. Councilman Ehrle was temporarily absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS: The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 88K-292 and 88R-293)
Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Councilman Ehrle was temporarily
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 88K-292 for adoption and 88R-293 for
adoption denying the requested Reclassification No. 87-88-51 and Variance
No. 3797 without prejudice and noting that the applicant had also withdrawn
his request. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 88R-292: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM OENYANG KECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-51.
RESOLUTION NO. 88R-293: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM D~NYANG V~KTLANG~ NO. 3797.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 88R-292 and 88R-293:
AYES:
NOES:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MF~IBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Hunter, Kaywood, Pickler and Bay
None
Ehrle
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 88R-292 and 88R-293 duly passed and adopted.
732
175
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
RECESS: By general consent the Council recessed for ten minutes. (4:43 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, ail Council Members
being present. (4:57 p.m.)
179: ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MEETING OF JUNE 30, 19~8 - DECISION DATE: JULY 7,
1988 -APPEAL PERIOD ENDS JULY 22, 1988
Cl.
VARIANCE NO. 3795 CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 5:
OWNER: FRITZ ROHNERAND TERESA G. ROHNER, 4il S. Mohier Drive,
Anaheim, GA 92807
LOCATION: 411 South Mohler Drive
To construct a 528 square-foot, 2-story addition to an existing
single-family residence with waiver of minimum side yard setback and
deletion of Condition No. 1 of Decision No. 88-29 pertaining to
dedication of an easement for equestrian/hiking trail purposes.
Variance No. 3795 APPROVED by the Zoning Administrator, Decision No.
ZA88-38.
C2.
VARIANCE NO. 3~08 CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 3-A:
OWNER: RONALD F. CIAMPAAND CORALINN J. CIAMPA, 920 Caile Venado,
Anaheim, CA 92807
AGENT: FRED FABRE', 624 West Wilson, B-i, Costa Mesa, CA 92627
LOCATION: 6950 East Avenida de Santiago
To construct a 2-story, 28-foot, 6-inch high, single-family residence
with waiver of maximum structural height.
Variance No. 3808 APPROVED by the Zoning Administrator, Decision No.
ZA88-39.
C3.
VARIANCE NO. 3813 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: FRED HUNT~, 224 East Broadway, Anaheim, CA 92805
LOCATION: 224 East Broadway
To construct an 8,245 square-foot commercial/office building with
waivers of (a) minimum number of parking spaces and (b) maximum fence
height.
Variance No. 3813 APPROVED by the Zoning Administrator, Decision
No. ZA88-40.
Councilwoman Kaywood had several questions about the proposed development;
City Attorney White confirmed for the Mayor that any questions and answers of
anybody on Informational Calendar Items are not evidentiary in terms of
getting information that later supplement a public hearing process. They
should be only minor ministerial type questions.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator. A 2-story building is proposed - the
first is for parkimg and the second story will be for offices. It is
approximately 25 feet from grade to the top of the building.
733
1"/6
City Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood. The house presently on the property is the Kate Rae
house which is presently on the National Historic Register having belonged to
a very important person and family.
City Attorney White. He is not aware of a legal requirement that the house be
preserved nor anything particular be done with it.
Fred Hunter, 405 Ridgeview, Anaheim. He knows the house intimately since it
houses his law offices. He has pictures of Kate and Ella Rae, her parents and
other historical pictures throughout the house. He has spent approximately
$150,000 to restore the house. It is his intent to move the house and restore
it back to a residential house. He would never demolish it. He has purchased
the buiidimg next door and now has two and one-half lots. He went to great
lengths to make the building he is proposing to construct amenable to the
neighborhood.
Mayor Bay. The only waivers being requested 32 vs. 33 parking spaces and an
8-foot wall vs. a 6-foot wall.
No action was taken by the Council.
C4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3030 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
OWNER: DOVALIS PROPERTIES, ATTN: NICHOLAS J. DOVALIS AND LILLIAN
C5.
DOVALIS, 1624 W. Chanticleer Road, Anaheim, CA 92802
AGENT: SAMI ZIOAN, 918 S. Magnolia, Unit B, Anaheim, CA 92801
LOCATION: 918 S. Magnolia, Unit C
To permit on-sale beer and wine in conjunction with the expansion of
an existing restaurant.
CUP NO. 3030 APPROVED by the Zoning Administrator, Decision No.
ZA88-41.
ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 0010 AND CEQA CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION,
CLASS 5:
Request to construct a 2nd story, 22-foot high, 389 square-foot room
addition to an existing single-family residence with waiver of
minimum side yard setback (10 feet required; ~ feet proposed) at 7~0
E. Amanda Drive.
WITHDRAWN
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES: The titles of the following ordinances were
read by the City Clerk. (Ordinance Nos. 4941 through 4945)
Councilman Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinances.
Councilman Ehrie seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
179: ORDINANCE NOS. 4941 THROUGH 4945: Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance
Nos. 4941 through 4945, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4941: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDiNG THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE ~E]ATING TO ZONING.
734
City Hall, AnAheim, California '- COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
(Amending Title 18 to rezone property under Reclassification No. 86-87-17
located at 2215 Loara Street, to the RS-5000 zone)
ORDINANCE NO. 4942: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18 to rezone property under Reclassification No. 87-88-i3
located at 1777 W. La Palma Avenue, to the CL zone)
ORDINANCE NO. 4943: AJq ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODERELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18 to rezone property under Reclassification No. 87-88-30
located at 2201-2227 E. La Palma Avenue, to the RM-1200 zone)
ORDINANCE NO. 4944: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEiM AMENOING THE ZONING
MAP REFER/LED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18 to rezone property under Reclassification No. 87-88-25
located at 3620, 3639, and 3640 Savanna Street, to the RM-i200 zone)
ORDINANCE NO. 4945: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18 to rezone property under Reclassification No. 87-88-33
located at 3~03, 3609, 3613, and 3621 Savanna Street, to the RM-1200 zone)
Roll Call Vote on Ordinance Nos. 4941 and 4945:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickier and Bay
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 4941 and 4945 duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call Vote on Ordinance No. 4942:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M_EMBblRS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Pickler and Bay
Kaywood
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4942 duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call Vote on Ordinance No. 4943:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter and Pickier
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood and Bay
ABSENt: COUNCILMEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4943 duly passed and adopted.
179: TERMINATING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2788:
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION: The title of the following resolution was
~ead by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 8~R-294)
735
174
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 88R-294 for adoption, terminating
Conditiomml Use Permit No. 2788, and declaring Resolution No. 86R-344 null and
void pertaining to property at 3085 E. La Palma Avenue. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 88R-294: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2788 ~D DECLARING RESOLUTION NO. 86R-344.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood, Pickier and Bay
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 88R-294 duly passed and adopted.
179: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2845 AND 2846 AND VARIANCE NO. 3603 -
RETROACTIVE TIME EXTENSIONS TO COMPLY WITH CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL:
REQUESTED BY: SAVOY M. BRLI.AVIA, HUTTON DEVELOPMENT COMPANY, INC.,
201 E. Sandpointe, Suite 300, Santa Ana, CA 92707-5750
LOCATION: Northwest corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Weir Canyon
Road
For a one-year time extension (retroactive to November 25, i9~7) to
expire on November 25, 1988.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to grant the one year extension of time
retroactive to November 25, i987 to expire November 25, 1988. Councilman
Hunter seconded the motion. Councilwoman Kaywood voted no because in her
opinion this is going to be one of the worse intersections in the City and to
give waivers and structural setbacks will have a negative impact.
Councilwoman Kaywood voted no. MOTION CARRIED.
179: GENERA~ PLAN REVIEW OF MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL LAND USES AND b~DIUM
DENSITY HOUSING STUDY: Submittal of the draft work plan for the studies
suggested by the Planning Commission and City Counell at their joint meeting
held May 10, 1988. This was considered by the Planning Commission under
Reports and Recommendations Items at their meeting held June 20, i988. This
matter was continued from meeting of July 12, 1988, to this date.
Submitted was staff report to the City Planning Commission dated June 20, 19~8
attached to which was the draft work plan - Proposed Medium Density
Residential General Plan Review and Associated Studies Draft Workplan.
Mayor Bay. He noted the plan submitted by staff is now recommending that tim
study area for the General Plan be extended State College Boulevard to the
western City limits instead of State College Boulevard to Euclid Avenue on the
west as discussed at the May 10, 1988 workshop. He asked the reasons why.
736
171
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 19, 1988, 1:30 P.M.
Lucy Yeager, Senior Planner. The reason for the change is to accommodate the
many medium density identified properties in the area west of Euclid to the
western City limits. The boundaries were extended in order to do a better and
more thorough job.
MOTION: Counctlwoman Kaywood moved to approve the subject wor~plan as
submitted by staff which includes the area from State College Boulevard to the
western City limits and that the process be expedited. Councilman Hunter
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
114: ANNOUNCEMENT OF NON-CANDIDACY: Mayor Bay. He is announcing that he
will not be a candidate in the November, 1988 General Municipal Election,
neither for the Office of Mayor nor member of tha Anaheim City Council. He
feels since the filing date for Mayor and Council candidacy opened yesterday,
July 12, 1988 and will be open for over a month, it is only fair that
potential candidates know what his plans are. He repeated he will not be a
candidate.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Bay moved to adjourn. Councilman Ehrle seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:31 p.m.)
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
737