1987/07/07?9
City Hall, Amaheim~ California - ~OUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 10:00 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular
session (of June 30, 1987).
PRESENT:
AB SENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR: Garry McRae
DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES:
MAINTENANCE DIRECTOR: John Roche
FIRE CHIEF: Jeff Bowman
Chris Jarvi
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 1:00 p.m. on July 3, 1987 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all
items as shown herein.
Mayor Bay called the adjourned regular meeting of June 30, 1987 to order at
10:20 a.m. on July 7, 1987 and welcomed those in attendance to the Council
meeting.
106: RESOURCE AI3.0CATION PLAN WORKSHOP: To consider amendments to the
1987-88, 1988-89 Resource Allocation Plan.
Ail items scheduled under the R.A.P. workshop were previously listed under
item Number 21 on the June 30, 1987 agenda and continued to this date.
1. 156: Declaring policy regarding the Police 2000 Pr6Ject. (Page 25 of the
R.A.P., item 21B)
Mayor Bay summarized that he still feels the Council is facing a
great deal of work on the budget due to the fact that the plan was
based on the premise of new revenue sources, whereas the stated
Council policy thus far is that to his knowledge the Council wishes
to work from the premise that there will be no new taxes. He
indicated he would like confirmation of that so as to be assured
they are working from a majority position.
Councilman Hunter concurred, with the exception of the Transient
Occupancy Tax, which does not directly affect the taxpayers of
Anaheim.
Councilman Ehrle indicated he was also opposed to any increase in
new taxes other than what has been approved, which is the 2%
increase on the "bed tax."
Councilwoman Kaywood voiced the opinion that Council Members should
first indicate and go on record as to whether or not they are in
favor of Police 2000.
628
8O
City Hall, Ap-helm, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 10:00 A.M.
Mayor Bay was of the opinion that discussion is not closed as of yet
on this issue, and that he feels the Council should not close
discussion or make a decision until they conclude that they have
done everything they can with the revenue which is at hand. The
problem being that the present R.A.P. implies that the Police 2000
project is almost totally dependent on new revenue.
Councilman Hunter moved to declare that the Council's policy be to
continue to implement Police 2000 within fiscal limits. There was
no second. Mayor Bay indicated he would support a motion stating it
is the intent of this Council to do everything possible within
fiscal restraints to implement Police 2000. There was no second.
At the conclusion of discussion the declaration of policy concerning Police
2000 Project was continued one week to be discussed on July 14, 1987, by
general consent. Councilwoman Kaywood was opposed, noting that two Council
Members were scheduled to be absent for that meeting.
2. 173: Declaring policy regarding the local revenue enhancement for
transportation improvements study to address Vision 2000 transportation
strategies. (page 37, item 21C)
Mr. Talley explained that there is a $30,000 cost for the study
which is not presently included in the two-year R.A.P. He noted
tbmt the most expensive proposition before the Council concerning
overall city needs is to solve the transportation problems,
particularly in the tourist-Convention Center.areas. This was
identified in Vision 2000 as a major city problem.
Council members discussed the possibility of funding this study out
of Katella Redevelopment Project, or of reimbursement from that fund
if the study were performed.
City Attorney Jack White agreed this might be possible to the extent
the reimbursement is based on benefit to the redevelopment area.
Mr. Gary Johnson, City Engineer, advised that he feels the City
needs to be reviewed as a whole. His primary concern is for the
approximate $36 million dollar deficiency in maintaining arterial
highways, 75% of which are outside of the redevelopment project
area. Arterial maintenance is greatly underfunded, there is a need
for up to $150 million.
MOTION: Councilwoman Kaywood offered a motion to approve the policy
regarding revenue enhancement for the transportation improvements
study to address Vision 2000 transportation strategies.
It was discussed that the City does have the ability to divide the
costs of the proposed study and to pay for the portion which relates
to redevelopment from Redevelopment Agency funds. Following
discussion, it was determined to act on the policy portion only and
629
City Hall~ Amoh~im, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987, 10:00 A.M.
to defer that portion pertaining to the study cost. With this
understanding the foregoin~ motion was seconded by Mayor Bay.
(Councilman Pickler absent) MOTION CAR/tIED.
3. 132: Declaring policy regarding staff study of alternative financing
mechanisms to address street and sidewalk maintenance. (Page 49, 21D )
Mr. Talley explained the purpose of this policy was to require
either assessments or that the property owners replace damaged
curbs/sidewalks in front of their homes. This is in conjunction
with personally owned trees. The suggestion is that Council direct
staff to bring back a report on other financing mechanisms.
MOTION: On motion by Mayor Bay, seconded by Councilman Ehrle the
City Council declared that their policy be to have staff study
alternative financing mechanisms to address street and sidewalk
maintenance. (Councilman Pickler absent.) MOTION CARRIED.
4. 156: Declaring policy regarding funding of the "public safety package" in
the 1987/89 RAP. (Page 2, 21F).
By general consensus this item was continued one week to the meeting
of July 14, 1987, to be considered together with the policy question
concerning Police 2000. Councilwoman Kaywood was opposed for her
previously stated reason.
5. 165/114: Revision to Council Policy No. 701, Sidewalk and Parkway Trees.
Ordinance for first reading amending Chapter 12.29 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code, pertaining to parkway trees and sidewalk repairs, and a proposed
resolution establishing service charges for repair of privately-owned
sidewalks in the public right-of-way.(21G).
Mayor Bay advised that he had reviewed the proposed policy and there
is one area within it which he would like to discuss. This relates
to the statement under "la" that the Parks Division will determine
if a tree should be removed. It was his understanding that if the
damage is caused by privately owned trees, then the owner is going
to be responsible for payment or repair, and if that is the case,
then why does the property owner not have something to say about
whether the tree should be removed or not.
Following brief discussion, on motion by Mayor Bay, seconded by
Councilman Hunter, these items were continued one week to allow
changes to be incorporated by staff into the Council Policy.
(Councilwoman Kaywood voted No. Councilman Pickler absent.) MOTION
CARRIED.
6. 129/000: Declaring policy regarding new fee programs in the Fire
Department, and the proposed resolution revising permit and other fees for
services rendered by the Fire Prevention Bureau effective July 1, 1987.
630
78
City Hall, A-theRm, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987, 10:00 A.M.
MOTION: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Mayor Bay,
the City Council declared its policy to support new fee programs as
submitted by the Fire Department. (Councilman Pickler absent.)
MOTION CARItlED.
Mayor Bay noted that while he approves of the fee policy as stated
above which is intended to raise revenues estimated at ~75,400 to
cover the costs of the stated programs, he was not ready to approve
that portion dealing with a new certification fee for business
license fire clearance. It was further his understanding this has
not been reviewed with the Chamber of Commerce.
Fire Chief Bowman indicated that Mayor Bay was correct and that the
City Manager had requested this portion of the proposal be postponed
for sixty days. Meetings are to be scheduled immediately with the
Chamber on this subject.
The issue relative to establishing certification fees for business
license fire clearance was removed from the agenda, to be
rescheduled by staff.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 87R-285 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-285: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM REVISING PERMIT AND OTHER FEES FOR SERVICES RENDERED BY THE FIRE
PREVENTION BUREAU OF THE FIRE DEPARTMENT AND ESTABLISHING THE EFFECTIVE DATE
OF FEES.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M~/BERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 87R-285 duly passed and adopted.
7. 153: Resolutions establishing the Management Pay Plan by adjusting the
management salary structure affecting Executive, Administrative, Middle
Management/Supervisory, and Professional/Technical classifications. (P1
through P4).
Mr. Talley noted that these resolutions are necessary to put in
place the new classifications and title changes for various
management classifications which will enable the City to proceed
with advertising and recruitment of those people who do not
constitute new positions. There is also concern about the 4.5
percent salary structure adjustment, and whether the Council wishes
to delay that action until October, which would add further to the
compression issues.
631
75
City Ha!!~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 10:00 A.M.
Mayor Bay noted that he has been openly opposed to the management
pay plan and the implementation of it across the last 4 - 5 years.
He presently disagrees with the recommended 4.5 percent adjustment,
and has heard talk among the Council about reviewing the entire MBO
and pay-for-performance system.
Mr. Talley explained that he understood the Mayor's concerns and
that it is most appropriate that the Council specify whatever pay
plan and classification plan the management is to work under,
however, the changeover and implementation will take months. In the
meantime, for the 1986-87 fiscal year, which has come and gone, the
employees have worked under this plan and to his thinking it would
not be equitable to change the rules at this point.
MOTION: The above resolutions relating to the Management Pay Plan
were continued to the meeting of July 14, 1987 on motion by Mayor
Bay, seconded by Councilman Hunter. (Councilwoman Kaywood voted
No. Councilman Pickler absent). MOTION CARRIED.
8. 153: Proposed resolution establishing management pay plan, rates of
compensation and pay policies for classes designated as Middle
Management/Supervisory in regard to the compression issue, effective June 26,
1987. (R)
Mr. Talley urgently recommended that Council adopt this resolution
because of the continuing inequity being experienced with pay
scales. Without approval of this proposed change, the problem will
be exacerbated.
Mayor Bay noted that this issue is not a new one, but the only
solution he hears proposed is to increase management and supervisory
pay scales above the highest bargaining unit levels, and no other
solution is proposed. In his opinion management should be seeking
to cut down on overtime and to reduce the lower levels rather than
always increasing at the upper level.
Mr. Talley stated he would agree with the Mayor's statement, however
there are two areas in this situation over which management has no
control, i.e., (1) it is the City ¢ouncllwhich determines the
salary rates for these subordinates, and (2) the City has no control
over the FLSA rulings which have imposed on the City overtime which
has a worth of one million dollars. The situation has become one
where employees do not seek promotion, nor take promotional exams
since the difference in salary does not make it worthwhile, in their
estimation, to take on additional responsibility.
Councilman Hunter concurred and noted that he is well aware of this
problem. He voiced the opinion that by allowing the situation to
remain as is will deliver a message to the line people saying don't
go to school, and don't advance yourself.
632
City Hall, A--he~m, C-lifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Garry McRae, Human Resources Director, in addressing the Mayor's
concern about the domino effect of this type of increase, briefed
the Council on the historical reasons the City is faced with the
compression problem. He noted that the proposed resolution was
carefully designed to increase promotions from 10 to 151 for certain
classifications; to provide time-and-a-half pay for situational
mann/nE in certain classes in both Police and Fire; and to provide a
one-time special adjustment of 5% or to the range midpoint for
designated classifications. He also noted that if the Council
adopts this proposed resolution without adjusting the salary
structure matrix by 4.5 percent, all of the corrections and
inequities will not be accomplished.
At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Hunter offered Resolution No.
87R-286 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-286: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 86R-291 ESTABLISHING THE MANAGEMENT PAY PLAN
BY ADJUSTING THE MANAGEMENT SALARY STRUCTURE, ESTABLISHING RATES OF
COMPENSATION AND MANAGEMENT PAY POLICIES FOR CLASSIFICATIONS DESIGNATED AS
MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY. (with regard to the compression issue)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter and Kaywood
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bay
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor
declared Resolution No. 87R-286 duly passed and adopted.
9. 153: Proposed resolution establishing the merit pool fund for all
management classifications. (S).
Mayor Bay was of the opinion that the City Council could not
establish a merit pool until after the remainder of their budgetary
decisions are made. He thereupon moved that this item be continued
along with the remainder of the decisions to the meeting of July 14,
1987 and thereafter on a week-to-week basis until resolved.
Mr. Talley pointed out that he considered it would be detrimental
for Council to delay this decision until October, when in actuality
the process of evaluation of the previous year's management
performance takes place in August.
Mayor Bay noted that the amount of money under discussion is
$900,000 which is significant and germane to the budget discussions.
The above motion was seconded by Councilman Hunter. (Councilwoman
Kaywood voted no. Councilman Pickler absent.) MOTION CARRIED.
633
Cit~ Rmll, Anmheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Jul7 7, 1987~ 10:00 A.M.
10. 153: Proposed Ordinance for first reading to amend Title 1 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, adding Chapter 1.06, relating to employer-employee relations
(U).
At the request of the City Attorney, the above item was continued one week to
the meetin& of July 14, 1987, by general consensus.
11. 129: New Budget Items--Proposed Resolution and Ordinances for first
reading amending Title 6 requiring persons who handle hazardous materials to
file annual disclosure forms; and relating to disclosure of hazardous
materials, establishing an annual payment of fees and penalties.
The above items were withdrawn by Mr. W.0. Talley and will be resubmitted to
the City Council in approximately 60 days, following their discussion with the
Chamber of Commerce.
ADJOURNHENT: Mayor Bay moved to adjourn the adjourned regular meeting of
June 30, 1987. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED. (12:25 p.m.)
LEONORAN. SOHL, CITY CLERK
634
City Hall~ An-heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pick~
/ / . ·
PRESENT:
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING: Norman J. Priest
TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Paul Singer
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Annika Santalahti
CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR: John Poole
DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION & COMMUNITY SERVICES: Chris Jarvi
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 1:00 p.m. on July 3, 1987 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all
items as shown herein.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Jack White requested a Closed
Session to consider the following items:
a. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 40-92-46; City of Anaheim vs.
Anaheim Hotel Partnership, 46-96-59; Grant Corp., et al, vs. City of
Anaheim, O.C.S.C.C. 41-32-50; Mendoza vs. City of Anaheim,
O.C.S.C.C. 38-50-28.
b. Labor relations matters - Government Code Section 54957.6.
c. Personnel matters - Government Code Section 54957.
d. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(c).
Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess into Closed Session. Councilman Bay
seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
(12:25 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present with the exception of Councilman Pickler, and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting. (1:40 p.m.)
CLOSED SESSION MATTERS: Human Resources Director, Garry McRae, presented
three resolutions which had been considered at Closed Session under personnel
and labor relations matters, and recommended that said resolutions be adopted.
BROWN ACT PROVISION: On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman
Hunter, the Anaheim City Council determined that the need to act an the
following item arose after the posting of the agenda for this meeting, on
635
24S
City Hall~ A_naheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987, 1:30 P.M.
Friday July 3, 1987 at 1:00 p.m.; and consequently waived the Brown Act
requirement relative to posting the item on the printed agenda. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
153: RESOLUTION NOS. 87R-287 THROUGH 87R-289: Councilman Bay offered
Resolution Nos. 87R-287 through 87R-289 for adoption. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-287: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING DATED JULY 1, 1987 BETWEEN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION GENERAL CITY
EMPLOYEES.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-288: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87R-82 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF COMPENSATION
FOR UNREPRESENTED PART-TIME JOB CLASSIFICATIONS.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-289: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 86R-008 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR PART-TIME JOB CLASSIFICATIONS WITH FULL-TIME EQUIVALENTS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter and Bay
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 87R-287 through 87R-289 duly passed and
adopted.
In response to question by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. McRae reported that the
annual fiscal impact of subject resolutions would amount to $783,000 in excess
of the 1987/88 Resource Allocation Plan.
Councilwoman Kaywood inquired as to the Council's intent regarding the overage.
Mayor Bay stated that the additional funds constituted one more matter to be
considered in the continuing examination of the Budget by the City Council.
wAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS; Councilman Bay moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda, after
reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to waiver is
hereby given by ail Council Members, unless after reading of the title,
specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Hunter seconded the
motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Bay reconvened the regular meeting of the Anaheim City
Council at 2:10 p.m. and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting.
Councilman Pickler was absent.
INVOCATION: Dr. Bryan Crow, Euclid Street Baptist Church, gave the Invocation.
636
City Hall~ Anmheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Miriam Kaywood led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
153: ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION: Sharon Erickson, President of
the Anaheim Municipal Employee Association, briefly addressed the City Council
expressing appreciation for the resolutions passed earlier in the day,
constituting settlement of litigation previously filed against the City
concerning personnel and labor relations matters.
119: INTRODUCTION: Mrs. Mary Nicolai, member of the Sister Cities Committee,
introduced Reiko Hasegawa, English teacher from Mito, Japan, who was visiting
at the Nicolai home. Ms. Hasegawa was then personally introduced to Council
Members and Mayor Bay, on behalf of the Council, welcomed her to Anaheim.
119: INTRODUCTION: Mrs. June Lowry, member of the Sister Cities Committee,
introduced Miss Laurie Rau, a 1987 graduate of Canyon High School, and
explained that Miss Rau would be traveling to Mito, Japan (Anaheim's Sister
City) under the Sister City Program to foster interest in student exchange.
Miss Rau was then introduced to the Council Members and Mayor Bay, on behalf
of the Council, welcomed her and wished her well..
119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Bay and
authorized by the City Council:
Parks and Recreation Month in Anaheim, July 1987.
119: EXPRESSIONS OF APPRECIATION: The following Expressions of Appreciation
were issued by Mayor Bay and authorized by the City Council:
Warren Belanger, for his concern and involvement with the "Anaheim Says No to
Fireworks" campaign.
The Union Federal Savings & Loan Association in Anaheim, along with Union
Federal Officials Ronald Spinoglio, Gary Bessey and Linda Ingalls, for their
involvement with the "Anaheim Says No to Fireworks" campaign.
129: EXTENDING THE BAN TO OTHER CITIES: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood,
seconded by Councilman Bay, the City Council directed that letters be
forwarded to the Orange County Board of Supervisors and to those Orange County
cities in which "safe and sane" fireworks are legal, suggesting that they
place a proposed fireworks ban on the election ballot. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
119: PRESENTATION - ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE: Immediate Past-President
Floyd Farano addressed the Council noting changes which have evolved over the
past years. The Anaheim Chamber of Commerce anticipates a closer relationship
with City government, and hopes to be more responsive to important matters of
public concern in the future. He expressed appreciation to the City for its
cooperation over the past year, which was an excellent one for the business
community and the City.
637
246
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
Robert Kuznik, the new Chamber of Commerce President, addressed the Council
outlining this year's theme of Continuity of Leadership and The Voice of
Business. He indicated the intent of the Chamber of Commerce Board of
Directors to work in partnership with the City Council and City staff on
matters of mutual interest, while continuing to promote Anaheim.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $6,309,245.28, in
accordance with the 1987-88 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Bay,
seconded by Councilman Ehrle, the following items were approved in accordance
with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council
Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilman Bay offered
Resolution Nos. 87R-290 through 87R-299, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer
to Resolution Book.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management:
a. Claim submitted by Chang Ko & Keum Hwa Lee for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about March 7, 1987.
b. Claim submitted by State Farm Insurance Company (Odino Gavieres,
insured) for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City
on or about March 11, 1987.
c. Claim submitted by Ann M. Sigler for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 17, 1987.
d. Claim submitted by Christopher James Martinkovich bodily injury
sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about February 12, 1987.
2. Receiving and filing the following correspondence: (on file)
a. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission, Minutes of June 3 , 1987.
b. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission, Minutes of June 10, 1987.
c. 105: Project Area Committee, Minutes of June 24, 1987.
d. 105: Public Library Board, Minutes of May 27, 1987.
3. 175/123: Authorizing an agreement with Stanton County Water District at
an annual cost of approximately 3624 for shared capacity rights to provide for
wastewater transportation for approximately 630 acres of property within the
City previously detached from the Stanton County Water District.
4. 180: Approving the offer of Fred S. James & Co., Broker of Record, to
place the City's excess worker's compensation insurance coverage, underwritten
638
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987, 1:30 P.M.
through Employer's Reinsurance, at an auditable premium of $70,012 for the
period July 1, 1987 to July 1, 1988.
5. 180: Approving the offer of Fred S. James & Co., Broker of Record, to
place the City's order for aviation liability insurance, underwritten through
Southern Marine and Aviation, Inc., at an annual cost of ~47,165.16 for
helicopter liability and 52,938.35 for heliport liability for coverage for the
period July 1, 1987 to July 1, 1988.
6. 180: Approving the offer of Fred S. James & Co., Broker of Record, to
place the City's order for blanket property insurance coverage, underwritten
throu&h lead carriers Home Insurance and Associated International Group, at an
annual premium cost of $727,500, for the period July 1, 1987 to July 1, 1988.
7. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-290: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1977-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT #1404)
(Levying an assessment of 534.97 on each lot and parcel)
8. 104: ILESOLUTION NO. 87R-291: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-2 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT #1859)
(Levying an assessment of 533.12 on each lot and parcel)
9. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-292: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-3 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT #1097)
(Levying an assessment of 596.60 on each lot and parcel)
10. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-293: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN ST~LEET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-4 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30~ 1988~ FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE
STF, EET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT #1392)
(Levying an assessment of 523.18 on each lot and parcel)
11. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-294: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1980-7 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT #2875)
(Levying an assessment of 540.87 on each lot and parcel)
12. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-295: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
639
244'
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 1516 AND
1653) (Levying an assessment of $39.97 on each lot and parcel)
13. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87K-296: A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-5 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACT #2090)
(Levying an assessment of $28.98 on each lot and parcel)
14. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-297: A KESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1981-6 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, F0R THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 2228 AND
2705) (Levying an assessment of $35.45 on each lot and parcel)
15. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-298: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1982-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 1326 AND
1563) (Levying an assessment of $23.75 on each lot and parcel)
16. 104: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-299: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM LEVYING AN ASSESSMENT ON EACH LOT AND PARCEL OF LAND CONTAINED
IN STREET LIGHTING MAINTENANCE DISTRICT 1985-1 FOR THE CONTRACT YEAR JULY 1,
1987 TO JUNE 30, 1988, FOR THE AMOUNT ESTIMATED TO BE NECESSARY TO IMPROVE THE
STREET LIGHTING SYSTEM FOR SUCH ENSUING CONTRACT YEAR. (TRACTS 1647, 3278 AND
3301) (Levying an assessment of $34.83 on each lot and parcel)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
AB SENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The l~ayor declared Resolution Nos. 87R-290 through 87R-299, Both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
End of Consent Calendar. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
169: AWARD OF CONTRACT - LINCOLN AVENUE REALIGNMENT~ PHASE II: At the
request of Councilman Hunter, subject contract award was removed from the
Consent Calendar and question was asked whether funds for the proposed work
were already approved and in place within the 1987-88 Budget. The answer was
in the affirmative.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 87R-300 for adoption, awarding a
contract to the lowest and best responsible bidder, Silveri & Le Boner JV, in
640
241 i
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
the amount of $5,051,953.63, for Lincoln Avenue Realignment, Phase II, Account
No. 46-792-6325-E2200. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-300: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC WORK. (SILVERI & LE BOUEF JV)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 87R-300 duly passed and adopted.
161/171: RESOLUTION - PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA: Upon report and
recommendation by the City Manager, Councilman Bay offered Resolution
No. 87R-301 for adoption, electing to receive allocations of taxes pursuant to
the Community Redevelopment Law in connection with the proposed Katella
Redevelopment Project Area. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-301: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ELECTING TO RECEIVE ALLOCATION OF TAXES PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT LAW.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 87R-301 duly passed and adopted.
179: REHEARING REQUEST - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2888: Request for a
rehearing submitted by Anaheim Hills Citizens Coalition, for Conditional Use
Permit No. 2888, to permit a church on RS-HS-22,000 (SC) zoned property
located at 441 Fairmont Boulevard, with Code waiver of maximum structural
height, granted by Council April 21, 1987.
Due to the absence of Councilman Pickler, who had taken part in the original
decision on subject Conditional Use Permit No. 2888, Councilman Bay moved that
subject request be continued two weeks to Tuesday, July 21, 1987. Councilman
Hunter seconded the motion,
City Attorney Jack White advised that there was a time factor involved in this
type of request, but action to continue would not violate the applicant's
application for rehearing, which was submitted in a timely manner. MOTION
105: APPOINTMENTS TO FILL TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30~ 1991 ON THE FOLLOWING
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to continue the
appointments for two weeks for consideration by all Council Members. The
motion died for lack of a second.
641
242
City Ball~ Anmheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
105: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION (4 YEARS) TERM ENDING JUNE 30~ 1991:
Councilman Bay nominated Dr. Robert Dory and Dan Martinez for reappointment,
and nominated Lt. Col. Earl F. Rhoads (new appointment). (Unexpired term of
Mr. Ranney ending June 30, 1988).
Councilwoman Kaywood nominated Susan Flandro. Nominations were closed.
Councilman Hunter moved that Lt. Col. Earl F. Rhoads be appointed to the
Community Redevelopment Commission. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion.
Councilwoman Kaywood abstained. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood moved to make the motion appointing Lt. Col. Rhoads
unanimous. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioners Dory and Martinez were unanimously reappointed each to an
ensuing 4-year term.
105: COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD (4 YEARS) TERMS ENDING JUNE 30, 1991: On
motion by Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, a unanimous ballot
was cast reappointing Judy Olsen, Betty Vion and Mary L. Hibbard to the
Community Services Board. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
105: HOUSING COMMISSION (4 YEARS) REGULAR HOUSING COMMISSION - TERMS ENDING
JUNE 30, 1991 AND (2 YEARS) - TRNANT COMMISSIONER; TERM ENDING JUNE 30, 1989:
by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Hunter, a unanimous ballut
On motion
was cast to reappoint Norman K. Cook and Edward D. Garda as regular Housing
Commissioners, and Jeannette Siegel, Tenant Housing Commissioner. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
105: INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT BOARD (4 YEARS) TERM ENDING JUNE 30, 1991: On
motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, John M. Flocken and
Robert J. Risteen were unanimously reappointed. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
105: LIBP~Y BOAILD (4 YF~S) TF~ ENDING Jb~NE 30, 1991: On motion by
Councilman Hunter, seconded by Councilman Bay, Barbara Wnorton was unanimously
reappointed to the Library Board. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
105:' PLANNING COMMISSION (4 YEARS) TERMS ENDING JUNE 30, 1991: Councilman
Ehrle nominated Frank Feldhaus to the Planning Commission. Councilwoman
Kaywood nominated Phyllis Boydstun. Councilman Hunter nominated John
Carusillo.
Nominations were closed.
Councilman Bay moved that Frank Feldhaus be appointed to the Planning
Commission. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilwoman Kaywood voted
no. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (Glen Fry vacancy)
642
City Hall, An-helm, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Bay moved that Phyllis Boydstun be unanimously appointed to the
Planning Commission. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (Charlene La Claire vacancy)
Councilman Hunter moved that John Carusillo be appointed to the Planning
Commission. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilwoman Kaywood
abstained. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (Len Lawicki
vacancy, term ending June 30, 1989)
105: PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD (4 YEARS) TERMS ENDING JUNE 30, 1991: On motion
by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, Joe White was reappointed to
the Public Utilities Board. Councilwoman Kaywood voted no. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay moved that Carl Kiefer be unanimously reappointed to the Public
Utilities Board. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler
was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood nominated Bob Kazarian. Councilman Bay nominated Ian
Skidmore.
Nominations were closed.
On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Hunter, Ian Skidmore was
appointed to the Public Utilities Board for the unexpired term ending June 30,
1989. Councilwoman Kaywood voted no. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CAR/tIED. (Nueler vacancy)
105: SENIOR CITIZENS COMMISSION (3 YEARS) TERMS ENDING JUNE 30~ 1990: On
motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay, Edward Stringer,
Sr., Frances Scherman and George Collins were unanimously reappointed to the
Senior Citizens Commission. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: By general consent, the City Council recessed to the Celebrity
Theatre, 201 E. Broadway, for public hearings scheduled this date. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (3:15 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present with the exception of Councilman Pickler. (3:25 p.m.)
Mayor Bay called the meeting to order at the Celebrity Theatre/Freedman Forum
Facility, 201 East Broadway, all Council Members being present with the
exception of Councilman Pickler. (3:28 p.m.)
179: CONTINUED PUBLIC HFARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2906 AND NEGATIVE
DECLARATION:
APPLICANT:
Mildred B. and T. E. Yellis
13680 Cloverdale, Corona Ca 91720
ZONING/LOCATION/REQUEST: CL zoned property located at 530 North Brookhurst
Street; to permit a convenience market with gasoline sales and off-sale beer
and wine.
643
City ~all~ Anahetm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Denied by the Planning Commission PC87-98.
HEARING SET ON: Appealed by Mr. W.F. Reynolds, Atlantic Richfield Company and
originally scheduled for the meeting of June 2, 1987, continued to this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin May 23, 1987.
Posting of property May 22, 1987.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - May 22, 1987.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report dated April 27, 1987.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT:
Wallace R. Davis, 540 North Golden Circle Drive, Santa Ama
92705, Attorney, representing the applicants.
Stated he has been before the City Council with similar
applications which were approved for similar mini-markets within
the City, at four different locations.
These have been operating with the sale of beer and wine without
detrimental effects. The applicant's proposal will greatly
improve the visual site and aesthetics at subject location. The
Code permits these sales in conjunction with mini-markets, the
applicant has complied with all City requirements in this
application, and requests approval.
Mr. Davis called attention to the recommendation from the
Traffic Engineer that two driveways, one each on Brookhurst and
Crescent Avenue be removed, and stated the applicant's
preference to retain these as they presently exist.
Councilman Hunter.
Noted that he had been contacted by adjacent property owners to
the east, with regard to the applicant building a six foot block
wall along the east side of the property, and this would remove
their objections.
Mr. Davis stated that would be acceptable to the applicant.
PUBLIC DI$CU$$ION:
John Lenney, 139 West Ball Road, Apartment C~ Anaheim.
Stated that it has in recent years been a problem for the public
to find restrooms, and noted that gasoline stations and
convenience markets have been approved without such facilities,
nor convenience such as water and air for motorists. He asked
that the Council require this project to have restrooms
available for the public.
Walter Bormann, 2704 W. Ball Road, Anaheim 92804.
Stated he is opposed to convenience stores selling any kind of
alcoholic beverages.
644
237'
City Hall~ An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
EXHIBITS, MATERIALS SUBMITTED:
Submitted by Mr. Davis together with letter dated July 2, 1987:
1. AM/PM Franchise Sales Brochure
2. Study conducted by Purdue University in 1986 regarding
common site sales of beer and wine and gasoline.
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Councilwoman Kaywood.
Voiced concern over the location of the proposed facility which
is right across the street from a junior high school. She also
was concerned over the possibility of employees under 21 years
of age selling alcohol to minors.
FINAL SUMMATION BY APPLICANT:
Mr. Davis advised that restrooms which will be open to the
public are included in the plans. The issue of air and water is
that it is a state law that requires any service stations
selling petrol products to provide these at no cost. He noted
the location for these facilities on the proposed plans. One of
the requirements imposed upon the CUP is that personnel employed
be over 21 years of age.
CHANGES TO PROPOSAL AS A RESULT OF DISCUSSION/COUNCIL CONCERN:
Added additional condition that the applicant build a six foot
block wall fence along the easterly property line.
Paul Singer, Traffic Engineer, reported that the plans as
submitted show one driveway from Brookhurst and one from
Crescent which does conform to the request made by his office.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Bay closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. Councilman Pickier was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Mayor Bay offered Resolution No. 87R-302 for adoption, granting Conditional
Use Permit No. 2906 subject to Interdepartmental Conditions, with added
condition relating to the construction by the applicant of a six foot block
wall along the easterly property line.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-302: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2906.
Roll Call Vote:
645
238
City Hall~ An-heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter and Bay
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 87R-302 duly passed and adopted.
176: PUBLIC HEARING -ABANDONMENT NO. 87-9A: In accordance with application
filed by Jerome R. Drukin, public hearing was held on proposed abandonment of
a sewer easement for the proposed development of a parcel located on Walnut
Street, north of Broadway.
Report of the City Engineer dated May 29, 1987 was submitted recommending
approval of said abandonment.
Mayor Bay asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no
response, he closed the public hearing.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-303: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM VACATING A SEWER EASEMENT FOR THE PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT OF A PARCEL ON
WALNUT STREET, NORTH OF BROADWAY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 87R-303 duly passed and adopted.
161: PUBLIC HEARING: A Joint public hearing with the Redevelopment Agency
and Community Redevelopment Commission to consider a proposed Redevelopment
Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area and the Environmental Impact
Report.
Mayor Bay called the Anaheim City Council meeting to order, all members
present with the exception of Councilman Pickler. (3:55 p.m.)
Chaizman Bay called the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to order, all members
present with the exception of Councilman Pickler. (3:55 p.m.)
Mayor Bay called the Community Redevelopment Commission to order. (3:55 p.m.)
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
VACANCY:
Dory, Martinez, Lirette, Berry, Rennet
Anthony
One
Mayor Bay declared the public hearing open for the Anaheim City Council,
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and Community Redevelopment Commission.
Mayor Bay made the following introductory remarks:
646
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987~ 1:30 P'M'
The purpose of this joint public hearing of the City Council,
the Redevelopment Agency and the Community Redevelopment
Commission is to consider the approval and adoption of the
proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment
Project Area and the Environmental Impact Report previously
prepared for the Project, pursuant to the Community
Redevelopment Law of the State of California.
The proposed Redevelopment Plan, the Environmental Impact
Report, and other related documents were prepared by the Anaheim
Community Redevelopment Commission, as provided under the
Community Redevelopment Law.
The Mayor will chair the Joint hearing.
This is the time and place set for such Joint Public Hearing as
specified in the Notice of Joint Public Hearing published
pursuant to the California Redevelopment Law. This is the time
to comment on, or object to the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for
the Katella Redevelopment Project Area and the certification of
the Environmental Impact Report previously prepared for the
Project, as well as to object to any of the proceedings taken in
connection with this Plan and the EIR, including this hearing.
Mr. Norman J. Priest presented the s-mm~ry of the proposed Redevelopment Plan
and related information. He explained that the purpose of today's hearing is
to consider the following Documents:
(1) Staff report.
(2) Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment
Project Area.
(3)
The Community Redevelopment Commission's Report to City
Council on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan, including among
other things:
(a) The Environmental Impact Report prepared for the
Project;
(b) The report and recommendation of the Planning
Commission;
(c) The report and recommendation of the Katella
Redevelopment Project Area Committee.
Mr. Priest advised this project has been one year in planning. He summarized
the history of its development and the appointment of the Project Area
Committee on May 17, 1987.
Mr. Priest explained that public notice was published in the Anaheim Bulletin
on June 10, 17 and 24, 1987 and July 1, 1987. Because Staff was involved in
some very complex fiscal review negotiations with the County and with other
647
236
City H~i~ A~heim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
taxing agencies, the mailing of notices to property owners was delayed until
the last possible moment, and mail delivery was slow. Consequently some
homeowners received notices only within the last few days. These notices
mentioned, as the law requires, the potential use of eminent domain and once
these words were sent out, they caused an excessive amount of concern from
property owners within the project area.
Mr. Priest thought it most productive to comment first on the 3-4 issues which
were raised most often during his telephone conversations with residents, and
which need clarification.
1. The Redevelopment Plan is a 35-year plan. The City would be
guiding actions of the Agency over a long period of time, and not
within a few months.
2. There is no land use in the Redevelopment Plan as proposed which
does not already exist in the General Plan.
3. There is no proposal to buy up residential neighborhoods, since
(a) there is no budget to accomplish this and (b) it would not make
sense.
The intent of the Plan in the residential areas is to work with private owners
through use of loan programs to assist in maintaining and upgrading of
properties. More directly the Plan will assist the City in having finances to
perform its obligation to maintain public facilities such as sewers, storm
drains, streets, sidewalks. Further this Plan does not intend to create
extraordinary powers of eminent domain.
Mr. Priest gave a brief description of the project, including the physical
boundaries and estimated amounts of money to be spent~ He explained that the
Anaheim City School District and Anaheim Union High School District would
receive 7.32 percent and 6.25 percent respectively of the incremental amount
of taxes received.
At the conclusion of the presentation, Mr. Priest introduced an amendment to
the Redevelopment Plan submitted for Council and Agency and Commission
consideration this date. The amendment to Section 308 would add the following:
Notwithstanding the foregoing, no property within the Project Area in
residential use shall be acquired by the Agency by eminent domain,
unless (a) it is for construction of a building, structure or
facility to be publicly owned; or, (b)-l. the Agency finds that the
property is dilapidated and is in need of substantial residential
rehabilitation and (b)-2 offers the owner thereof an opportunity to
enter into an owner participation agreement which identifies the
measures to be taken; (b)-3 the owner fails to enter into within one
year from date of such offer, or fails to satisfy the terms,
conditions and obligations within the time established thereby.
Mr. Priest concluded that the Project proposes and staff intends above all to
work with the neighborhoods. He recommended approval of the project with the
amendment outlined above.
648
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
Written Comments in Favor of the Proposed Project:
Margaret E. Morrissey
1232 Laster
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Carolyn Sripathy
Vice President/Manager
Bank of America
2260 So. Harbor Blvd.
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Joel B. Rothman/General Mgr.
Marriott Hotels/Resorts
700 West Convention Way
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Louis A. Laulhere - Proprietor
LaVie en Rose
240 So. State College Blvd.
Brea, Ca. 92621
Horace Heidt, Jr.
Horace Heidt, Jr. Orchestra
14155 Magnolia Blvd., Ste #47
Sherman Oaks, Ca. 91423
John L. HiLl/General Manager
Heritage Inn
333 East Imperial Highway
Fullerton, Ca. 92635
George Colouris
George Colouris Productions
501 North Brookhurst, Ste. #100
Anaheim, Ca. 92801
Mel. E. Miller
Chairman of the Board
Pacific Inland Bank
888 So. West Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92802-1808
Eugene L. Saenger, Jr.
Executive Vice President
Wrather Corporation
270 North Canon Drive
Beverly Hills, Ca. 90210
Michael A. Bullis
President
Disneyland Hotel
1150 West Cerritos Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
William F. Snyder
President
Ana. Visitor & Convention Bureau
800 West Katella Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
L.C. Smull
Business Properties
17631 Fitch
Irvine, Ca. 92713-9586
Peter. S. Rummell - President
Disney Development Company
500 South Buena Vista Street
Burbank, Ca. 91521
Written Comments Opposed to the Proposed Project:
Janet Botula
City of Anaheim Planning Dept.
P.O. Box 3222
Anaheim, Ca. 92803
Dorothy C. Raus
1328 S. Claremont
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
Margot E. Palmgren
1327 S. Hickory St.
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
Alfred O. Long
846 S. Aspen Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
649
234
City Hall, A~aheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
Mrs. Anna Haske
608 S. Kiama Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Roy & Frances Onishi
1922 Janette Lane
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
William & Jean Lewis
600 Kiama Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Martette M. Selitrennikoff
1913 Janette Lane
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Five Signature Petition
c/o 1415 Kimberly Lane
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
David & Linda Rudawitz
1311 West Crone Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Richard L. Franck
Attorney for Everest Electronics
and Everest Engineered Plastics
333 S. Hope Street, 27th Floor
Los Angeles, Ca. 90071-1488
George S. & Doris M. Hager
1211 West Chateau Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Tim & Michelle Knoch
1334 S. Margate Place
Anaheim Ca. 92805
Ms. ThanhT. Tran
527 S. Dickel Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
18-Signature Petition
W of Walnut btwn Ball/Cerritos
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
Ralph& Maureen Brito
1514 W. Trenton Place
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Do-Tzu Hoo & Shirley Hoo
2568 E. Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Donna R. Reitzel
626 Kiama Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Stanley & Marie Hillman
1421 Apollo
Anaheim, Ca.
Joseph R. Mindak
608 S. Kiama Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Jetti J. Anghelone
2231 S. Oertley Drive
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Herbert A. Clark
1908 Kathy Lane
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Burton Zoul
P.O. Box 176
Tustin, Ca.
92681
Robert R. & Mary B. Love
2009 Jauette Lane
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Brian & Joanne Casteel
1343 S. Hampstead
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Annette K. Tofield
1421 Colonial
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
8-Property Owner Petition
1416 Beacon Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Fred J. Michalson
2042 Gail Lane
Anaheim Ca. 92802
Charles Boyer
1190 Locust Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
Jose & Ngoc Resendez
2535 E. Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
65~
23 :
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987, 1=30 P.M.
Robert & Kathrine
2599 E. Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
William S. Smolen
2543 Omega Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Ronald & Susana Mickels
2519 Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Sarah Gonzales
2534 Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Milton & Evelyn Milton
2512 Omega Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Briham & Shirley Sum
2562 E. Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Barbara & Robert Croft
2511 E. Omega Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Jane Robinson
1301 Care Street
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Cheryl Ann Mackay
2519 E. Omega Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
William & Margarat Dieters
2535 E. Omega Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
12-Signature Petition SinhV. Trinh
Katella Redevelopment Neighborhood 2574 Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92802 Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Lester & Wayne Gray
2551 E. Omega Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Irv& Jean Impens
2518 Riles Circle
Anaheim, CA. 92806
Denise A. Freed
2531 E. Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Iguyen
2575 S. Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
Harold L. Stancil
2539 E. Riles Circle
Anaheim, Ca. 92806
67-Signature Petition
Katella Redevelopment Project
Anaheim CA
Donna J. Reppert-Watson
1556 West Beacon Avenue
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
222-Signature Petition
From Harold E. Smith
Temporary Spokesman
1402 Colonial Avenue
Anaheim CA
Oral Comments in Favor of the Proposed Project:
Paul Bostwick
Chairman of the Katella Project Area Committee
1411 South Anaheim Blvd.
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
Robert Kuznik
Member of the Business Community and President
of the AnaheimChamber of Commerce
1016 East Katella
Anaheim, Ca. 92802
651
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
Betty Tang
1355 Dallas Drive
Owner of Condominiums at
1381 S. Walnut
Anaheim, Ca. 92805
Joan Murphy
339 E. Cliffwood
Anaheim, Ca.
Ruth Moore
2528 E. Rios
Anaheim, Ca.
Questions concernin~ the Proposed Project:
Mrs. Ronconi
1241 South Walnut
Anaheim, Ca.
Robert Porter
2047 Margie Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Mike Palace
157 West Margate Drive
Anaheim, Ca.
Margot Pondquin
Anaheim, Ca.
Edwin Freeman
1838 Janette Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Bill Edwards
1215 Laster
Anaheim, Ca.
Pamela Peralta
631 South Helena
Anaheim, Ca.
T. W. Burge
1381 So. Walnut/Condo #2902
Anaheim, Ca.
Susan Kohler
555 So. Dickel Street
Anaheim, Ca.
Katherine Wry
531 S. Citron
Anaheim, Ca.
Evelyn Collins
882 S. Clementine Street
Anaheim, Ca.
Tom Roncevich
1537 West Minerva Avenue
Anaheim, Ca.
John Lenny
Anaheim, Ca.
William Culvert
2080 South Janette Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Darlene Shelling
Anaheim, Ca.
Joan Schlund
Anaheim, Ca.
Rose Mae Williams
Anaheim, Ca.
Peter M. Lee
2374 Willowbrook Lane #7
Anaheim, Ca.
William W. Lee
Anaheim, Ca.
Robert Perry
16065 Perry Heights Drive
Riverside, Ca.
652
City Hall, An-heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
Peter Nance, Jr.
1112 Chateau Avenue
Anaheim, Ca.
Renee Escobar
Triplex at Juno & Loara
Anaheim, Ca.
David Gnotta
2311 South Mira Court
An-heim, Ca.
Judy Coderre
232 West Simmons
Anaheim, Ca.
Gulab Kanal
625 South Harbor
Anaheim, Ca.
Sharon Freeman
1838 Janette Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Carol Garrett
1423 West Laster
Anaheim, Ca.
Violet Hovakintan
1837 Jacalene Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Jim Bollenbacher
2017 So. Margie Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Joyce Tabris
1315 So. Walnut Street
Anaheim, Ca.
Clyde Schlund
616 Peralta Hills Drive
Anaheim, Ca.
Loretta Mormon
1883 South West Street
Anaheim, Ca.
Joseph Fiedler
325 Berry Avenue
Anaheim, Ca.
MarJorie Haley
1774 Heather Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Bob Briggs
727 So. Harbor Blvd.
Anaheim, Ca.
Robert Hamilton
1517 West Lincoln
Anaheim, Ca.
Jerry Murphy
City of Orange
Joyce Yon Ploennies
1546 Beacon Street
Anaheim, Ca.
Van Forsythe
1170 Wakefield
Anaheim, Ca.
Shirley Pfieffer
822 South Helena
Anaheim, Ca.
LenAlexander
Anaheim, Ca.
Daniel Zermeno
1414 West Katella Avenue
Anaheim, Ca.
Shiow-Ing Lin
426 West Ball Road
Anaheim, Ca.
Mrs. William LeForge
1922Kathy Lane
Anaheim, Ca.
Bill Townsend
601 Corto Place
Anaheim, Ca.
Charles Smith
1927 South West Street
Anaheim, Ca.
653
23O
City Hall~ A~ahetm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987t 1:30 P.M.
John Lenny
139 West Winston
Anaheim, Ca.
Tom Dougherty
216 Charlotte
Anaheim, Ca.
Mayor Bay noted that the City Council has taken quesions for 2-1/2 hours and
all concerned now need some time to review these and prepare responses.
By general consent the City Council, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, and
Community Redevelopment Commission recessed for a 15 minute break. (7:20 p.m.)
After Recess, the City Council, Anaheim Redevelopment Agency and Community
Redevelopment Commission were called to order by Mayor Bay (7:45 p.m.)
Mayor Bay noted that the affected property owners had asked a number of very
good questions which deserve to be answered. Due to the number of unanswered
questions and the great amount of concern expressed by the area residents, in
his opinion there was no way the City Council could make this decision this
evening, consequently he intended to move to continue the public hearing for a
minimum of 60 days.
Prioz to making his motion, Mayor Bay requested that the citizens present
carefully consider during this period of time, both the pros and cons of the
Redevelopment Project, and the fact that without the project, local government
will not be able to provide storm drains, underground electrical facilities or
solve the traffic problems in their area. The Katella Project would provide
funding for resolving some of these infrastructure problems, without
increasing property taxes.
Mayor Bay requested that each citizen who addressed the Council, Agency and
Commission this date be sent a copy of the answers; and also that they be made
available in each Branch Library throughout the City, together with the
information on the Plan itself and the EIR. Mayor Bay offered each of the
Council and Agency Members an opportunity to comment.
Councilman Hunter thanked all those who attended for coming. He commented
that whatever else you might say, government does work when you get involved,
and encouraged the citizens to stay involved.
Councilmember Ehrle voiced the opinion that all of the citizens had the right
to be heard on this issue, and that he sensed their frustration over the poor
communications on this project. He stated he would do all he could to make
sure communications are more appropriate in the future.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that change does occur and the advantage of a
Redevelopment Project is that it allows the City and citizens to assure the
change will be a positive one.
MOTIGN: On motion by Mayor Bay, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the joint
public hearing on the Katella Redevelopment Project was continued for a period
of 60 days to September 8, 1987, at 7:00 p.m. (Councilman Pickler absent.)
MOTION CARRIED.
654
22T
City Hall~ Anahetm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
ADJOURNMENT - COMMUNITY KEDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: On motion by Commissioner
Martinez, seconded by Commissioner Rennet, the Community Redevelopment
Commission adjourned. MOTION CARRIED. (8:00 p.m.)
ADJOURNMENT - ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: On motion by Commissioner
Kaywood, seconded by Commissioner Hunter, the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency was
adjourned. Commissioner Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (8:00 p.m.)
RECESS: By general consent, the City Council recessed for five minutes to
reconvene immediately thereafter in the City Council Chamber. MOTION
CARRIED. (8:01 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor reconvened the meeting, all Council Members being
present with the exception of Councilman Pickler. (8:15 p.m.)
108: APPLICATION FOR TAXI SERIVCE - WEST COAST CAB: Application submitted by
William R. Hart, Attorney representing West Coast Cab Company, for permit to
operate a taxi service in Anaheim, was continued from the meeting of June 16,
1987.
Reference was made to materials submitted by the law firm of Farano and
Kieviet, Attorneys representing Yellow Cab Company of Northern Orange County,
and Mayor Bay suggested that the Council might wish to refer subject
application to a hearing officer to examine the large amount of evidence.
City Attorney Jack White was of the opinion that the Council had the option to
refer this matter to a hearing officer to hear testimony and make a final
determination.
Mayor Bay invited representatives of both the applicant and the opponents to
present their arguments, pro and con, concerning the proposed assignment to a
hearing officer.
Mr. Daniel White, of Hart, King and Coldren, Attorneys, Santa Aha,
representing West Coast Cab, expressed opposition to the referral, based on
the potentially enormous costs involved. In his opinion, materials submitted
with their application had presented prima facie evidence of need and
necessity; further, Code requirements prerequisite to the establishment of a
taxicab service in the City had been met.
Mr. Floyd L. Farano, of Farano & Kieviet, Anaheim attorneys representing
Yellow Cab Company of Northern Orange County, pointed out the complexity of
the concept of public need and necessity. He noted there was considerable
evidence to be considered in this matter, and he felt that West Coast Cab
Company intended to request the Council to base its decision on uncorroborated
evidence that would raise more questions than it would answer.
Mr. Farano called attention to the poor service performance of another taxicab
company which received permission to operate in Anaheim in the past and the
question now was not should another service be allowed to operate here but
would West Coast Cab Company be the company that could provide good,
legitimate service. The only fair way to make that determination was to
655
228
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
examine all of the facts, and Yellow Cab Company was prepared to pay the full
cost of referring the application to a hearing officer.
Mr. White expressed concern that it would cause a delay in initiating their
service while awaiting assignment of a hearing officer and a date. He failed
to see the basis for the hearing, inasmuch as the City staff stated the
applicant had satisfied all Code requirements.
Code Enforcement Officer John Poole confirmed for the record that approval of
subject application had been recommended in his Staff Report.
Mayor Bay and Councilman Ehrle both stated they were not opposed to the
appli, cation or to competition of taxicab services within the City, but they
felt the facts should be brought out in order to determine whether West Coast
Cab was the appropriate company to provide the service.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved that the application by West Coast Cab Company
be referred to a hearing officer, all criteria to be examined at the time of
that hearing. Councilman Hunter seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
149/142: PROPOSED ORDINANCE RELATING TO BUSSES: Proposed addition of Section
14.32.070 of the Code relating to operation of busses loading and unloading
passengers, stopping or standing in a through traffic lane intended for the
use of vehicular traffic, was continued from the meeting of June 9, 1987, to
allow staff to meet with bus companies to work out a feasible plan to solve
the problems involved and discussed at the meeting.
The City Engineer submitted report dated June 29, 1987, together with minutes
of a meeting held on June 25, 1987, with several bus carriers and motel/hotel
owners where many objections to the proposed ordinance were expressed. The
outcome of said meeting was the appointment of a Bus Task Force which will
further investigate and make recommendations to the committee for the
establishment of bus loading and unloading zones on streets wherever possible,
and on private property when practical in order to accommodate as much as
possible the movement of traffic on the affected arterial streets.
It was moved by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay, that staff
be directed to continue working with the Bus Task Force and bring back
recommendations within 45 days. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
179: ORDINANCE NO. 4847: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4847 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4847: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18, Reclass. 86-87-25, RM-1200, 527 No. Magnolia Avenue)
Roll Call Vote:
656
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4847 duly passed and adopted.
179: ORDINANCE NO. 4848: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4848 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4848: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18, Reclass. 84-85-42, CL, 1570 West Katella Avenue)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4848 duly passed and adopted.
108/179/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4849: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4849
for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4849: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION
18.02.052 OF CHAPTER 18.02 AND SECTION 18.84 .038 OF CHAPTER 18.84 OF TITLE 18
OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO HOME OCCUPATION AND TREE
PRESERVATION, RESPECTIVELY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4849 duly passed and adopted.
124/101/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4850: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4850
for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4850: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION
1.04.110 OF CHAPTER 1.04 OF TITLE 1 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNICIPAL CODE R~I.~TING TO
OFFICERS AND DEPARTMENTS. (creating separate departments of Convention Center
Department and Stadium Department)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4850 duly passed and adopted.
657
Ctt7 Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 7~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
BROWN ACT PROVISION: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by
Councilman Bays the Anaheim City Council determined that the need to act on
the followinE two items (Ordinance Nos. 4851 and 4852) arose after the postinE
of the agenda for this meetings on Friday July 3s 1987 at 1:00 p.m.; and
consequently waived the 72-hour Brown Act requirement relative to posting the
item on the printed agenda. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
179: ORDINANCE NOS. 4851 AND 4852: Councilman Ehrle offered Ordinance Nos.
4851 and 4852 for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4851: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18, Reclass. 79-80-25 (17))
ORDINANCE NO. 4852: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFFAiRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Amending Title 18, Reclass. 79-80-25 (18))
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST:
No items of public interest were addressed.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: On motion by Councilman Bays seconded by
Councilwoman Kaywoods the Council recessed into Closed Session. (9:05 p.m.)
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Hunter moved to recess to July 14, 1987 at
10:00 a.m. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED. (9:35 p.m.)
LEONORAN. SOHL, CITY CLERK
658