1986/06/17City Hall, Anaheim, California - OOUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth
COUNCIL M~gBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ZONING: Annika Santalahti
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT & AUDIT: Ron Rothschild
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Ron Bates
COMMUNITY SERVICES MANAGER: Steve Swaim
Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Mary Hibbard, Anaheim United Methodist Church, gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Ben Bay led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Roth and
authorized by the City Council:
Star Trek Weekend in Anaheim, June 21-22, 1986.
Deborah Leigh accepted the Star Trek Weekend proclamation.
119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations was
unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to the Esperanza High
School Golf Team on winning its first C.I.F. Golf 4-A Division Championship.
Three members of the time were present along with their Coach A1 Safalo,
Athletic Director Jim Patterson and the school's Principal Mr. A1 Hocking.
119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations was
unanimously adopted by the City Council to be presented to Mary Bushnell,
Utility Engineer Support Supervisor, on his retirement from the Utilities
Water Division after 31 years of dedicated service to the City.
119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations was
unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to Irene Opdyke for her
compassion and willingness to become involved in the laves of the Jewish
people during the holocaust. Mrs. Opdyke has been honored by many
organizations in the past for her courageous service in preserving the lives
of others.
119: RATIFICATION OF RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION: The City Council ratified a
Resolution of Appreciation presented to Rabbi George Schlesenger who is
leaving the community to assume new duties in New Jersey after 6 years of
dedicated service as Rabbi of Temple Beth Emet in Anaheim.
455
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
MINUTES: Councilman Overholt moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held June 3, 1986. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda,
after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to
waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $3,762,023.02, in
accordance with the 1985-86 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Pickler,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilman Pickler
offered Resolution Nos. 86R-270 through 86R-273, both inclusive, for
adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. Councilman Roth offered Ordinance
No. 4724 for first reading.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management:
a. Claim submitted by R. W. Borrowdale for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about February 27, 1986.
b. Claim submitted by Gregg M. Gibbons for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 20, 1986.
c. Claim submitted by Shannan Hatfield, by and through her guardian ad
litem, Annetta Hatfield for bodily injury sustained purportedly due to actions
of the City on or about February 6, 1986.
d. Claim submitted by Larry Harlan Harmsen for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 3, 1986.
e- Claim submitted by Janet H. Lansdowne for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about February 27, 1986.
f. Claim submitted by William V. Hoffman for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about A~ril 22, 1986.
g. Claim submitted by Jil-Lisa De La Cruz for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 20, 1986.
h. Claim submitted by Karen E. Jeffries for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about February 9, 1986.
456
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
i. Claim submitted by Abdul Adam Hammad for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 12, 1986.
2. Receiving and filing the following correspondence: (on file)
a. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission, Minutes of May 21, 1986.
3. 123/153: Authorizing the HumanResources Director to execute a Request
for Group Insurance Amendment with Standard Insurance Company, Policy No.
384412, changing the eligibility for the Long Term Disability contract for
employees in classifications represented by the Anaheim Municipal Employees
Association, to be effective January 1, 1986.
4. 123: Authorizing an agreement with The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe
Railway Company, to provide for the Railroad to install rubberized crossing
material at Crossing No. 2-170.3 north of Katella Avenue, with the City
providing the materials.
5. 123: Authorizing an Affordable Development Agreement with Kenneth M.
Keesee to provide for two affordable rental units in a proposed development of
six senior rental units to be located at 208 So. West Street.
6. 123: Authorizing an Affordable Development Agreement with Hugo A.
Vazquez, Abhihandan A. and Rashmi A. Desai, to provide four 2-bedroom
affordable rental units in a proposed 15 unit rental development to be located
at 320 West Vermont Avenue.
7. 123: Authorizing an Affordable Development Agreement with Mohammad
Hossein Rezazadeh Seilabi, to provide two 3-bedroom affordable units for sale
in a proposed 8-unit condominium to be located at 1262 E. La Palma Avenue.
8. 123: Authorizing Lease Agreement No. I with James E. Crowley and Richard
P. Heinz, monthly rental of $2,208 per acre ($3,532.80 total), for development
of an automobile paint and body shop on a portion of the Ball Road Auto Center
property, for a term of 25 years with options for two additional consecutive
terms of five years each.
123: Authorizing Lease Agreement No. II with James E. Crowley and Richard P.
Heinz, monthly rental of $2,208 per acre ($5,895.36 total), for use as a new
and used auto sales and service facility on a portion of the Ball Road Auto
Center property, for a term of 25 years with options for two additional
consecutive terms of five years each.
123: Authorizing Lease Agreement No. III with James E. Crowley and Richard P.
Heinz, monthly rental of $2,208 per acre (~5,829.12 total), for use as a new
and used auto sales and service facility on a portion of the Ball Road Auto
Center property, for a term of 25 years with options for two additional
consecutive terms of five years each.
9. 123/160: Authorizing the First Amendment to Agreement with Vertical
Management Systems, Inc., providing processing and collection services of bail
457
City Hall, Anaheim, California - ~OUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
fines and assessments relating to parking citations, in accordance with Bid
No. 4215, adding an option for a one year extension of time to June 30, 1987.
10. 160: Accepting the low bid of Western Highway Products, in the amount of
$6,863.68, for accessories, Items 1-9, in accordance with Bid No. 4338.
160: Accepting the low bid of Safeway Sign Company, in the amount of
$15,683.71, for aluminum blanks and signs, Items 10-58, in accordance with Bid
No. 4338.
11. 164: RESOLUTION NO. 86R-270: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC WORK. (BEECHER
OONSTRUCTION COMPANY) (Awarding a contract to the lowest and best responsible
bidder, Beecher Construction Company, in the amount of $244,971, for Haster
Street Storm Drain Improvement, Account No. 25-791-6325-E1490)
12. 169: RESOLUTION NO. 86R-271: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL
PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND
TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL
WORK NECESSARY TO OONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO
WIT: LA PA/~4AAVENUE STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM. (Accepting the completion of construction of the La Palma Avenue
Street and Storm Drain Improvements, Account Nos. 46-793-6325-E3850,
46-791-6325-E1400, 46-791-6325-E1410 and 46-791-6325-E1430, Blair Paving,
Inc., contractor, and authorizing filing of the Notice of Completion therefor)
13. 158/123/106: RESOLUTION NO. 86R-272: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH
WESTERN NATIONAL PARTNERS VIII AND FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT THE SALE OF
CERTAIN CITY-OWNED PROPERTY TO BE IN THE BEST INTERESTS OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM. (Finding and determining that the sale of certain City-owned
property, comprised of 4.3 acres of land located on the east side of Loara
Street adjacent to and north of the Carbon Canyon Flood Control Channel,
(within Sage Park), to be in the best interests of the City, and authorizing
an agreement with Western National Partners.VIII in the amount of 31.2
m~llion, and depositing said funds into Fund 16 (Parks and Recreation).
14. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 86R-273: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES OR INTERESTS THEREIN.
15. 149: ORDINANCE NO. 4724: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING A
NEW SUBSECTION .2300 TO SECTION 14.32.190 OF CHAPTER 14.32 OF TITLE 14 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING AND STOPPING. (West of Harbor
Boulevard to Citron Street)
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 86R-270 through 86R-273:
AYES: COUNCIL M~4BERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MI~4BERS: None
458
77;
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 86R-270 through 86R-273, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
End of Consent Calendar. MOTION CARRIED.
123: AFFORDABLE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH PACESETTER HOMES: Councilman
Pickler moved to approve the terms and conditions contained within the
Affordable Development Agreement proposed between the City of Anaheim and
Pacesetter Homes, Inc., and authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to
execute said Agreement on behalf of the City Council, as recommended in
memorandum dated June 13, 1986 from the Community Development Department.
Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITemS: The following actions taken by the City
Planning Commission at their meeting held May 28, 1986, pertaining to the
following applications were submitted for City Council information.
1. VARIANCE NO. 3563: Submitted by Kaufman & Broad of So. Calif., Inc., to
construct a 15-lot single-family detached subdivision on RS-A-43,000 zoned
property located north and west of the intersection of Bauer Road and Monte
Vista Road, with the following Code waivers: (a) Required lot frontage, (b)
minimum setbacks on cul-de-sacs, (c) minimum building site width, (d) minimum
building site width on a cul-de-sac, (e) minimum front-on garage setback.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-133, granted
Variance No. 3563, and granted a negative declaration status.
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2799: Submitted by James Emmi, to permit a
religious fellowship including counseling services, print-shop and bookstore
on ML zoned property located at 1853 Raymond Avenue, with Code waiver of
minimum n,,mher of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-134, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2799, and granted a negative declaration status.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2800: Su~nitted by Richard C. and Winifred C.
Meadows, to per~u%t industrially-related sal~s businesses and office uses on ML
zoned property located at 3455 East La Palma Avenue, with Code waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-135, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2800, and granted a negative declaration status.
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2801: Su~nitted by Dennis T. DeDominico,
(Golden Grain Macaroni CO.), to retain a road base processing, storage and
distribution facility on ML zoned property located at 920 East Cerritos
Avenue, with Code waivers of minimum required setbacks and permitted
enc roac hments.
The City Planning Comm4ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-136, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2801, and granted a negative declaration status.
459
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2803: Submitted by Shoei Yeo and Hon Ye Lee
Suen, (Tampico Motel), to construct a 12-room addition to an existing 20-unit
motel on CL zoned property located at 2016 East Center Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-137, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2803, and granted a negative declaration status.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2804: Submitted by Lawrence G. Downing and
Greg Nelson, (Anaheim Seventh Day Adventists Church), to permit an overnight
shelter in an existing church facility on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located
at 900 South Sunkist, with Code waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-138, denied
Conditional Use Permit No. 2804, and granted a negative declaration status.
7. VARIANCE NO. 3562: Submitted by Delbert E. and Sally L. Yarbrough, to
construct a family-room addition on RS-5000 zoned property located at 3049
Cardinal Street, with Code waiver of maximum lot coverage.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-139, granted
Variance No. 3562, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical exemption
determination, (Class 1)
8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 1166 (READV.) AND 1645 (READV.): Suk~itted by
Michael L. Valen, (Funbus Systems, Inc.), requesting extensions of time or
deletion of conditions pertaining to annual review for Conditional Use Permit
No. 1166, to establish bus storage and repair facilities and incidental rental
of automobiles on property located at 304 Katella Way and Conditional Use
Permit No. 1645, to'permit a bus terminal in the RS-A-43,000 zoned property
located at 1825 Mountain View Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC86-141 and 142,
granted deletion of conditions requiring extensions of time to Conditional Use
Permit Nos. 1166 (Ready.) and 1645 (Ready.).
9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2650--TERMINATION: Submitted by Magic Carpet
A~nbulette Corp., requesting tern%ination of Conditional Use Permit No. 2650, to
permit an outdoor, non-emergency ambulance storage and maintenance facility on
property located at 1420 South Allec Street, aA a condition of approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 2668.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-143, terminated
Conditional Use Permit No. 2650.
10. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1941--TERMINATION: Submitted by David R.
Jackson, (The Fairmont School), requesting termination of Conditional Use
Permit No. 1941, to permit a roofing contractor's storage yard with Code
waivers of permitted encroachment into required setback and m~imum fence
height on property located at 1595 West Broadway, as a condition of approval
of Conditional Use Permit No. 2643.
460
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-144, terminated
Conditional Use Permit No. 1941.
11. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2613: Submitted by John Koycla requesting
te=mination of Conditional Use Permit No. 2613, to permit a s-m{-enclosed
restaurant with on-sale beer and wine, and with Code waiver of minimum number
of parking spaces, on property located at 406 West Vermont Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-145, terminated
Conditional Use Permit No. 2613.
12. VARIANCE NO. 923, SPECIAL USE PERMIT NO. 37 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
765--TERMINATIONS: Submitted by Harbor Cliff, (Formerly Westwinds Trailer
Lodge), requesting termination of Variance No. 923, to permit a house trailer
sales lot, Special Use Permit No. 37, to permit 6 trailer spaces to
acco~nodate overnight parking of small trailers, and Conditional use Permit
No. 765, to expand an established trailer park by the addition of 11 overnight
trailer spaces, on property generally located at 2170 South Harbor Boulevard,
as a condition of approval of Reclassification No. 84-85-9.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-146, terminated
Variance No. 923, Special Use Permit No. 37 and Conditional Use Permit No. 765.
13. VARIANCE NO. 3561: Submitted by Jerry Tremble, Inc., to expand an
existing industrial building on ML zoned property located at 3941-3969 East La
Palma Avenue, with Code waivers of minimum structural setback and yard
requirements and minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Co-~ssion, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-132, denied
Variance No. 3561, and granted a negative declaration status.
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by the applicant and,
therefore, a public hearing will be scheduled at a later date.
14. VARIANCE NO. 3564: Submitted by Lic, Inc., to erect a freestanding sign
on ML zoned property located at 828 South Anaheim Boulevard, with Code waivers
of maximum number of freestanding signs and minimum ground clearance of
freestanding sign (deleted).
The City Planning Compression, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-140, denied
Variance No. 3564, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical exemption
determination, (Class 11).
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by the applicant and,
therefore, a~ublic hearing will be scheduled at a later date.
End of Planning Commission Consent Calendar. MOTION CARRIED.
170: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 12665 (REV. NO. 1): Submitted by Mohler Family
Trust, to establish an ll-lot, residential, single-family subdivision on
property located at 270 South Mohler Drive.
461
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - ~OUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
The City Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. 12665 (Rev. 1), to
expire June 19, 1986.
108: ORDINANCE NO. 4725 - VENDING FROM VEHICLES: Amending Section 14.32.310
relating to vending from vehicles. Submitted was report dated June 11, 1986
from the City Attorney.
City Attorney Jack White stated the proposed ordinance is being submitted per
Council's request as a result of the public hearing held by the Council on
May 31, 1986. The ordinance has been drafted to incorporate all the items
included in the staff report from the Community Development and Planning
Department which was discussed and available at that meeting. Also
incorporated are liability insurance provisions requiring each company that
conducts a street vending operation to have liability insurance in an amount
of not less than ~1 million. The only additional item included at the request
of the Code Enforcement Division is a provision that would prohibit any street
vending within 500 feet of any public or private elementary, junior high or
high school.
Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance No. 4725 for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4725: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION
14.32.310 OF CHAPTER 14.32 OF TITLE 14 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING
TO VENDING FROM VEHICLES.
Mayor Roth questioned the ~1 million insurance requirement.
Mr. White explained it is similar to the insurance requirement for most other
relationships the City has with either contractors, people or entities that
come to the City for permits. It is not a uniform amount in all cases but in
public works agreements and most other contractual relationships. At the
current time, the City's self insured retention is ~1 million. Since the
insurance requires the City to also be named as an additional insured under
the policy, it would protect the City from liability exposure by these
operations.
Mayor Roth also asked if those who would be affected by the ordinance had been
notified, not only the food vendors, but also those companies who operate
catering trucks, lunch wagons, etc. Before the Council adopted the ordinance,
he wanted to be certain that those companies received a copy of the proposed
ordinance and had an understanding of the provisions contained therein.
City Clerk Sohl reported that Council received correspondence from the Latino
street vendors organization requesting a copy of the ordinance when it became
available. She also called Mr. Nava at the Orange County H~,man Relations
Commission on Friday. Since he was on vacation, she left a message that the
item was to be introduced at today's meeting and that the ordinance was
available in her office. She also mailed a copy to the street vendors
organization address in Santa Ana. She could also obtain a list of vendors
from Business License and send a copy of the ordinance to them. The ordinance
would normally be scheduled for final adoption in one week, but since the June
462
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - OOUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
24, 1986 meeting was the last major budget discussion day,
wish to schedule adoption at the meeting of July 1, 1986.
give her an opportunity to send letters to the vendors.
the Council might
This would also
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to continue adoption of proposed Ordinance
No. 4725 to Tuesday, July 1, 1986. Councilman Roth seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
108: ORDINANCE NO. 4718 - PROHIBITING THE SALE OF HOT FOODS AT SERVICE
STATIONS: Amending Section 18.87.023 of the Code, to prohibit sale of
prepared foods at service stations wherein alcoholic beverages are sold. The
issue of selling hot foods at mini-markets also selling gasoline and beer and
wine was introduced at the Council meeting of May 13, 1986 by Councilman
Overholt, discussed at the meeting of May 20, 1986 when the proposed ordinance
was offered for first reading, and also discussed at the meeting of June 3,
1986 and given an amended first reading.
Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to speak.
Mr. Alan Wagner, 622 North Philadelphia, Apt. #B.
He again spoke against the proposed ordinance as he did at the
previous meeting on the issue. The only issue that seemed to be
causing a problem is the correlation between hot food and
gasoline. Ail other correlations have been found to be
acceptable throughout the City. The presence of gasoline did
not constitute a clear and present danger not otherwise
possible. The denial of the right to diversify is a denial of
the public's right to shop where they will. The Council was
placing a limitation on the individual's pursuit of happiness.
He hoped the Council would consider the implications of the
limited diversification.
Councilman Overholt offered Ordinance No. 4718 for adoption. Refer to
Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4718: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SUBSECTION
.060 OF SECTION 18.87.022 OF CHAPTER 18.87 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE TO PROHIBIT SALE OF PREPARED FOODS AT SERVICE STATIONS.
Before a vote was taken, Councilman Overholt stated he has
become convinced over the period of debate that the problem is
not the sale of hot foods at businesses that dispense petroleum
products and alcohol but the problem is dispensing alcohol and
petroleum products at the same facility. The Planning
commission has been holding tight and constantly denying
approval of applications for CUP's where gasoline and alcohol
products are proposed to be sold at the same location. He
(Overholt) has always supported the majority vote of the Council
and subsequently approving those CUP's. He was prepared to say
today that the Planning Commission has been right and he has
been wrong. The issue is the sale of beer and wine at gas
stations and not other items. The ordinance in its final form
463
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
is inappropriate. Arco pioneered the dual use, convenience
stores and gas stations, in the City. Subsequently they said
they could not make money at the convenience stores and it was
necessary to sell beer and wine at those stores. Again on a
split vote, the Council, in most cases, approved the sale of
gasoline and beer and wine and then other products that a
convenient store sells. He was wrong in voting for that. He
does not intend in the future to encourage the proliferation of
such facilities in the City. He was going to vote against the
ordinance as it presently exists. The issue is the sale of beer
and wine at gas stations and in the future he intends to vote
against those applications.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated the issue is that gas stations have
received waivers and privileges not granted to other businesses
historically because they serve the motoring public. That is no
longer true. They provide no service to the motorist any longer
and it is an unsafe situation. The issue is also the
combination of alcohol and gasoline and the message this
combined sale implies.
Councilman Pickler stated statistics proved that drunks come
from bars and restaurants more than mini-marts. He has
personally watched the activity at mini-marts selling hot foods
and noted it is rare when customers purchase an alcoholic
beverage to consume with their food. He could not go along with
Mr. Overholt's philosophy until he saw data to prove that
mini-marts, because of selling gasoline and beer and wine, cause
drunk driving. It did not represent a shift in his past
position. His main concern with previous CUP's for combined
uses was traffic, circulation and the particular location
involved.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing ordinance which failed to carry by the
following vote:
AYES: OOUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood
NOES: COUNCIL M~4BERS: Overholt, Bay,
ABSENT.. 00UNCIL MEMBERS: None
Pickler and Roth
144: JOINT POWERS AUTHORITY - FOOTHILL AND EASTERN CORRIDORS: Councilman Bay
reported on the monthly meeting of the subject Authority held Thursday,
June 12, 1986. The agenda is available and minutes of those meetings are
published each month. The actual amendment to the Memorandum of Understanding
did not occur on a direct request from the Mayor of Irvine and was tabled for
one month until the July meeting with a report from the Mayor that he was
hoping to have three votes on the Irvine Council ~o support Irvine being a
voting member of the Authority. He (Bay) hoped that prediction would come
true because all the agencies wanted all along was to have Irvine as a member
not only voice, but a full voting member taking part in those important
regional decisions on the transportation problems of the County.
464
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
114: FUNDING FOR CALIFORNIA OUTER CONTINENTAL SHELF OIL DRILLING LOCAL
GOVERNMENT COORDINATION PROGRAM: Councilman Pickler referred to letter dated
May 8, 1986 from the County of Santa Cruz urging the City of Anaheim to
participate financially in the ongoing efforts to fund a California Outer
Continental Shelf Local Government Coordination Program ensuring local agency
involvement in off-shore drilling decisions. The request is that each city
contribute ~2,000 and each County ~7,500. He recommended that the City
allocate ~2,000 to the Program to be appropriated from Contingency Funds.
Mayor Roth first wanted clarification on the express purpose of contributing
~2,000; Councilman Pickler stated the monies would be used to keep the City
apprised of the situation relative to off-shore drilling and reinstitute the
moratorium on such drilling.
Mayor Roth stated he is opposed to off-shore drilling at the present time on
the basis that the platforms are self-contained and generate their own power
which, in turn, creates air pollution problems. He did not have any objection
to Councilman Pickler's proposal but suggested that the Council receive a
report from the City Manager relative to the issue and the possible investment
of ~2,000 when the coastal cities have been keeping a close watch on the
situation. The item should then be placed on the agenda. The South Coast Air
Quality Management District has gone on record in opposition as well.
Councilman Overholt stated he was personally opposed to off-shore oil drilling
but the Council should know what the issue is if they are going to allocate
taxpayer funds to a group.
Staff was directed to prepare a report and subsequently place the item on an
agenda.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: Mayor Roth announced that a Closed session would be
held to confer with the City Attorney regarding:
a. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim,
Orange County Superior Court Case No 40-92-46.
b. Personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session and a lunch break.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:14 a.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all council Members
being present. (1:40 p.m)
179: PUBLIC HEARING - TO AMEND ORDINANCE NO. 4711: To consider extending the
45 day effective period for Ordinance No. 4711, prohibiting any uses of
certain property which uses are in conflict with the zoning proposal the City
is considering for such property, in accordance with Government Code Section
65858. Submitted was report dated June 10, 1986 from the Community
Development and Planning Department, Zoning Division, recommending the
extension of Ordinance No. 4711 for a maximum additional 10 and 1/2 months for
465
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
a reduced geographical area as shown in red on a map entitled, "Commercial
Recreation Area - Urgency CR Ordinance" with the date of Council's approval.
Subsequently two motions would be in order, (1) directing staff to prepare the
ordinance to finalize certain CR zoning and (2) directing staff to prepare an
amendment to the general plan proposing modification of the boundaries of the
commercial recreation area.
City Attorney Jack White stated that the ordinance, if adopted, would take at
lease four affirmative votes and need to be read in full prior to adoption
today.
The Mayor asked to hear from those who wished to speak.
Daniel Studer, 278 North Wilshire, Anaheim, Ca. 92801.
He is representing a number of people who all favored the
proposed rezoning. He thereupon submitted several letters in
support as well as a petition signed by approximately 26 people
supporting the, "CR zoning measure for Anaheim as defined by the
City's General Plan and Ordinance No. 4711." He explained for
the Mayor that they were concerned about the problems that
alcohol brings to a community and there enough liquor stores in
the community already.
Mayor Roth stated that the ordinance, in proposing a
reclassification of certain properties to CR, did not mean
alcoholic beverages were not going to be sold in those areas
since typically hotels would sell alcoholic beverages in their
restaurants and lounges. He did not want them to be misled.
Mr. Studer clarified that hotels would be an upgrade to the area
and bring in better clientele.
Jim McGuiggin, attorney, Santa Ana.
He is representing one of the businesses encompassed in the new
proposed zoning who is in favor of the ordinance. He is also
present to express a minor concern of his client, Topps Motel.
The motel has recently dedicated a strip of land to the City in
front of the building and the adjacent undeveloped 10t for
purposes of street widening. They are now in a position where
they have a 26 year old landmark sign in the street. They are
undertaking to move the sign 20 feet back to the property line.
They have had a request from the Engineering Department to
accelerate the relocation. They intend to apply for a permit to
move the sign and hope that the "moratorium" on permits and
building will not hamper or delay that process.
Annika Santalahti, Assistant Director for Zoning.
She stated she did not believe it would make any difference.
Topps Motel is an agriculturally zoned property and would be a
legally nonconforming use even if the zoning were changed. She
is not aware of any reason why it would affect the situation at
all.
466
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
Anna Hong.
She recommended that the Council pass the proposed ordinance to
rezone the proposed areas to CR. She is a member of the
business community and currently has a conditional use permit to
build 355 rooms 2 blocks south of Convention Way on Harbor
Boulevard and she liked the way the City was planning to rezone
and beautify the area. Her franchise is a raddison motel with a
Velvet Turtle Restaurant. She has letters from residents and
businesses in Anaheim also recommending that the Council pass
the measure. (The letters were submitted and made a part of the
record).
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Roth closed the public hearing.
Councilman Pickler offered Urgency Ordinance No.
Ordinance Book.
4726 for adoption.
Refer to
ORDINANCE NO. 4726: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM EXTENDING INTERIM
ORDINANCE NO. 4711 PROHIBITINGANY USES OF CERTAIN DESCRIBED PROPERTY WHICH
USES ARE IN CONFLICT WITH THE ZONING PROPOSAL THE CITY IS CONSIDERING FOR SUCH
PROPERTY AND DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE IS AN URGENCY MEASURE WHICH SHALL
TAKE IMMEDIATE EFFECT.
Before a vote was taken, City Clerk Sohl read the ordinance aloud in full.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing ordinance.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES .-
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
COUNCIL MEMBERS
Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4726 duly passed and adopted.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to (1) direct staff to prepare an ordinance
to finalize CR zoning (approved in connection with Reclassification No.
66-67-61) for tho~e parcels which are currently developed with uses ¢0mpatible
with the CR zone standards, and (2) direct staff to prepare an amendment to
the General Plan, proposing modification of the boundaries of the Commercial
Recreation Area, as recommended in memorandum dated June 10, 1986 from the
Community Development and Planning Department, Zoning Division. Councilwoman
Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
174/106: PUBLIC HEARING - PROPOSED USES FOR FEDERAL GENERAL REVENUE SHARING
FUNDS: To consider proposed uses of ~1,187,579 in Federal General Revenue
Sharing funds for the Fiscal Year 1986/87. Submitted was report dated
June 10, 1986 from Program, Development & Audit, recommending that the Council
receive any and all comments regarding Federal General Revenue Sharing (FGRS)
in accordance with FGRS Regulation 51.14a.
467
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Ron Rothschild, Program, Development & Audit Manager,
briefed portions of the data attached to his report which gave
the history of the Federal General Revenue Sharing Program, the
apportionment formula, use requirements, revenue and proposed
use of the FGRS receipts which for Anaheim for the 1986/87
Fiscal Year are estimated to be 4466,000. Those monies
represent one quarter of the receipts from Entitlement 17 for
the last quarter of Federal Fiscal Year 1986. Since a
re-enactment of FGRS is not anticipated, no funding beyond
September 30, 1986 is assumed. Approximately 460,000 of
interest earnings are estimated for the pending fiscal year
along with ~681,579 in rebudgeted fund balances. The proposed
uses for the 1986/87 Fiscal Year total ~1,187,579 as follows:
1. Storm Drain Construction
2. Safety striping
3. Street light conversion
4. Productivity revolving fund
5. Revenue Sharing grant audit services
6. Reserve for future appropriations
Total proposed use
4 500,000
51,500
123,000
65,500
2,546
445,033
41,187,579
Councilman Bay surmised that the plan was based on the monies
ending totally on September 30, 1986, and if the funds did not
terminate, the Council would be notified and decisions would
have to be made as to disposition. Mr. Rothschild confirmed
that the above recommendation was based upon those monies
terminating on September 30, 1986.
City Manager Talley stated there would probably be an additional
hearing required. If there was additional funding staff would
not only bring the Council the funding and the regulations, but
also proposed expenditures so that the Council could adopt those
as they chose and also amend the Resource Allocation Plan to
include the additional funds.
Councilman Bay stated he wanted the public to be aware that the
plan was based on the funds ending at the end of the Federal
Fiscal Year, The policy of the Council is to never plan for
this type of Federal funding to be allocated toward long-term
expenditures.
Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to speak to the proposed uses of Federal
General Revenue Sharing Funds; there was no response.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to close the public hearing on proposed uses
for Federal General Revenue Sharing Funds. Councilman Overholt seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
106: PUBLIC HEARING - APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT: To consider the appropriations
limit of 4105,428,388 for the Fiscal Year 1986/87. Submitted was report dated
468
City ~a!l, Anaheim, C~lAfornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
June 10, 1986 from the Program, Development & Audit Manager,
recommending that the Council establish an appropriations limit
of $105,428,388 for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1986 and
ending June 30, 1987.
City Manager Talley stated that the Council has been provided with the subject
report along with 7 Exhibits A through G showing the calculations for the
proceeds of taxes subject to limitation as well as the appropriations limit
and appropriations limit margin (see City of Anaheim, Appropriations Limit for
the Fiscal Year commencing July 1, 1986 and ending June 30, 1987).
Councilman Bay noted that the appropriations limit reflects back to the Gann
changes and controls by the State voted by the people at the time of the
Jarvis Amendment. It was interesting to know that the consumer price index
only rose 2.3 percent along with a slight rise in population within the City
affecting the limitations. The appropriations limit, however, had a 16.4
percent margin worked into it. The numbers presented in the appropriations
limit documentation were much clearer than those presented in the budget
report. It was possible to look at the net changes in taxes in the City by
comparing the information with last year and the year before. The figures
also reflect the added user fees as a replacement of taxes which were a little
over ~1.1 million for the coming year.
Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to speak to the appropriations limit of
$105,428,388 for the fiscal year commencing July 1, 1986 and ending June 30,
1987; there was no response.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to close the public hearing on the 1986-87
fiscal year appropriations limit. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler offered Resolution No. 86R-274 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 86R-274: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, ADOPTING THE ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE FISCAL
YEAR 1986/87.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL M~IBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay,
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
Pickler and Roth
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 86R-274 duly passed and adopted.
106: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - BUDGET: To consider the proposed 1986/87
Resource Allocation Plan. The public hearing was continued from the meeting
of June 10, 1986, to this date (see minutes of June 10, 1986).
City Manager William Talley introduced the Anaheim Visitor and Convention
Bureau budget to be presented by its president, Bill Snyder as outlined on
469
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10.'00 A.M.
Page 18 of the 1986/87 Resource Allocation Plan consisting of five major
programs. The proposed budget for Fiscal Year 1986/87 is ~200,250,000. Mr.
Bill Snyder, President, Anaheim Visitor and Convention Bureau gave an overview
of the accomplishments in the past year and the forecast for the coming year
including reaching a milestone of one million delegates coming to the City.
He also briefed the aggressive advertising program proposed and presented
several ads which will be inserted in major publications. The Bureau is
operating at much higher levels than in the past both in the Convention and
tourism areas.
Chamber of Commerce Blue Ribbon Committee Presentation:
City Manager Talley prefaced the presentation by stating that Anaheim
is unique in the approach it takes to the City's Resource Allocation
Plan. The Chamber of Commerce appoints a Blue Ribbon Committee which
examines those aspects of the plan which they choose to review and
submits a report to the Council. Their report was submitted on
June 12, 1986 (see Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Blue Ribbon Committee
report on the 1986/87 City of AnaheimResource Allocation Plan - on
file in the City Clerk's Office). Mr. Les Welch was going to make
the Co~nittee's presentation today. At approximately noon today,
staff finished their response to the Chamber, placed it in the
Council mailboxes and also provided copies to the Chamber (see -
response to the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Blue Ribbon Committee
report - City of Anaheim 1986/87 Resource Allocation Plan, June,
1986). He pointed out that (1) staff's response has been prepared
and submitted to the Committee so that they would know the City and
staff recommendations, (2) to acknowledge publically that staff is
most appreciative not only of the Chamber's method of working with
the City, but also the valuable input they are giving City staff.
Mr. Lester Welch, representing the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Blue
Ribbon Committee, stated he was present today filling in for Dennis
Hardin who had been scheduled to make the presentation. He stated
first that the Chamber was most appreciative and has been impressed
by the City Departments professionalism and very capable staff. The
cooperation has been truly outstanding. Mr. Welch then read Pages 3
and 4 of the Blue Ribbon Committee report, General Government,
submitted under letter dated June 11, 1986 from Dennis Hardin,
Chairman of the 1986 Blue Ribbon Committee.
There was no discussion or questions posed on the Blue Ribbon Committee report
at this time.
RECESS: By general consent, the Council recessed for five minutes.
(2:45 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (2:52 p.m.)
community Service Organization Request Reviews:
Jackie Terrell, Chairperson, Community Services Board prefaced the
Board's report of May 30, 1986, recommending that the Council approve
470
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
a Community Service Agency funding level of $141,906. The report discussed
the funding process involved, presentations made before the Co~nunity Services
Board by 20 Community Service Agencies who requested funding, and the basis on
which the Board made its recommendations. Also submitted was a blue booklet
containing funding applications and comprehensive background data submitted by
each of the requesting agencies. Prefacing the documentation was the budget
request comparison chart listing the Community Services Board (CSB)
recommended funding level for 1986/87 for each agency which data also
contained previous funding levels (1984/85 - 1985/86). It was also noted in
the report that agencies had the right to appeal funding recommendations made
to the City Council by the Board and that this budget hearing should serve as
an appeals session.
Mayor Roth and Council Members conveyed their appreciation and thanks
to the Board for the great deal of time and effort spent ultimately
providing the council with guidelines in determining funding levels
for those agencies serving the human needs of the community.
Mrs. Terrell, in turn, commended Steve Swaim, Community Services
Manager, for his untiring assistance.
The following representative/agencies then spoke relative to their
funding requests, the services provided, why funds should be
allocated to their organizations or changes made to the
recommendations by the Board: Dee Carlin, Director of Social
Services, Anaheim Memorial Hospital, Anaheim Temporary Assistance
Program (A.T.A.P.) - request (first time) $7,500, CSB recommended
funding level, $7,500 - one time funding: Cynthia Schienberg,
Executive Director, Coalition Concerned with Adolescent Pregnancy
(C.C.A.P.), community action for Parents and Administrators - request
(first time) $6,650, CSB recommended funding level - none -
justification - prefer coalition be funded by the Anaheim Union High
School District; Anaheim Union High School District (A.U.H.S.D);
Beverly Carlton-Hoffman, Executive Director, Volunteer Center of
Orange County, North, Home Helping Hands (H.H.H.) - request, $9,258,
CSB recommended funding level, $6,500 - justification - the Agency is
meeting the needs of the community's elderly.
Discussion:
Dee Carlin, A.T.A.P.
She is not appealing the funding level of $7,500 but the
recommendation by the Board that the request be limited to one time
funding only. The organization wanted to have the opportunity to
submit future proposals for consideration to the Council.
Councilwoman Kaywood expressed concern that the Board would have
voted differently if they knew the funding was to be ongoing.
Jackie Terrell.
It was the Board's understanding that it would be one time funding.
A Board member asked if it could be a one time funding and the answer
was yes.
471
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Overholt asked if the one time funding was a limitation
asked for by A.T.A.P.; Ms. Carlin answered no. A committee worked on
the application and the first time they came to the CSB perhaps
A.T.A.P. had a misconception. They understood the Board to say they
would be willing to accept a one time donation if it was a sizable
amount. At the second meeting, their Committee member had the
opportunity to make the A.T.A.P. position clear but did not take that
opportunity.
Councilman Overholt surmised that there was a misunderstanding all
the way; Councilman Pickler stated there was nothing to preclude the
organization from coming back in the future.
Steve Swaim, Community Services Manager, stated there was nothing
stating that an organization could not come back, however, in the
past when the Board approved a recommendation that says one time
only, the Board holds it up as one time and does not encourage that
organization to come back in future years. Some m-mhers of the Board
at the time felt the request should be seed money only and that the
organization would have the ability to raise resources in future
years.
Councilwoman Kaywood encouraged the organization to look to other
sources for future funding since it was questionable what kind of
money, if any at all, would be available next year. She maintained
that the CSB undoubtedly would have taken a different course of
action if it was clear to them that it was not a one time funding.
Eileen Anthony, Member of the CSB.
When the Board first voted on the issue and when the organization
appeared before the Board, it was with the understanding that it was
one time funding. She is a Member of the Board voted on the basis of
one time funding. It was seed money for the organization.
Councilman Bay.
He felt it was important to recognize that the CSB had set up a firm
policy relative to one time funding and he encouraged the Board to
hold to that policy unless something exceptional justifies a change.
He also looked to see what an organization was doing for fund raising
in the private sector. He noted for this organization the fund
raising for 1986/87 amounted to $550. The organization has more
potential to raise considerably more than that from the private
sector.
Cynthia Schienberg, Executive Director, Coalition Concern with
Adolescent Pregnancy.
She answered questions posed by Council Members relative to the
program. Councilwoman Kaywood specifically wanted to know if the
Anaheim Union High School District had been approached for funding
noting that the CSB in their justification for zero funding felt that
the program should be funded by the District.
472
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
Ms. Schienberg explained that the program proposed to the CSB was a
parent education program. It is not a program which the School Board
would fund in that it is adult education and not education directly
to the adolescent.
Beverly Carlton-Hoffman, Executive Director, Home Helping Hands.
The request to the City is for ~9,250 for 1986/87. Last year the
support level had been ~8,050. They are asking for only a small
increase whereas the Board's recommendation was a cut from last year
to ~6,500. Anaheim has a large elderly population and 40 percent of
the clients in the program reside in Anaheim.
Margaret Sullivan, Member of the Community Services Board.
She voted against H.H.H. because of negative experiences she had with
them. She had called the organization three times for herself and
one time for a gentleman who was in need of assistance and they never
answered. She could not see how the organization claimed to do so
much good when they did not help the people who were in need.
Mrs. Hoffman did not have an answer for Mrs. Sullivan who had made
H.H.H. aware of the matter previously. They searched their records
to find if they had received a call. Regrettably they did not have
an explanation and it was not the kind of situation that they wanted
to build a reputation on. They tried to keep track of all the calls
but there was no explanation in their records.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, Mayor Roth closed the
public hearing on the Community Services Agencies Funding Requests.
City Manager Talley stated that the Council asked that staff bring
back the issue of the proposed additional ~25,000 for the California
State University Fullerton Gerontology Center which Council indicated
they wished to consider during the budget session. Nothing was
presently included in the RAP for an additional ~25,000.
Councilman Overholt felt that the $25,000 previously allocated to
this program was intended as the full donation to his recollection.
Councilman R0th agreed but recalled it was going to be considered at
budget time.
Councilman Bay stated that two Council Members had expressed the
~25,000 was all they had in mind, and he would be the third member,
as that was his view as well.
By general Council consensus, it was determined that an additional
~25,000 not be allocated to the Gerontology Center.
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to approve the Community Services Agency
Funding for Fiscal Year 1986/87, as recommended by the Community Services
Board in the amount of ~141,906.00. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion.
473
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
Before a vote was taken, Councilman Overholt stated he was going to
offer two motions that would serve to amend the recommendation of the
Community Services Board.
Councilman Overholt thereupon moved to amend the stipulations with
regard to the A.T.A.P. Program by removing the one time funding
limitation. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion.
Before an action was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood stated the situation
was very clear to the Community Services Board. There were other
agencies who did not get the full amount requested and others where
the recommendation was zero. Enough people had said that they would
not have voted for the $7,500 if it was to be ongoing.
Councilman Bay felt if this was going to be an exception, it should
be clarified as such so that the policy would not be changed. Mayor
Roth again asked Mrs. Terrell if she felt there was confusion or that
the intent of the Board was clear; Mrs. Terrell answered it was clear
it was one time funding and that was the reason for the $7,500
recommendation. One of the members asked if it was one time funding,
the response was yes so the Board decided to go for the total amount
requested.
Councilman Overholt maintained that there was confusion and because
of that offered his motion.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion, calling for removal of the one
time funding stipulation and failed to carry by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Pickler and Overholt
Kaywood, Bay and Roth
None
Councilman Overholt moved to raise the allocation to H.H.H. to the
same level as last year's allocation to that Agency or $8,050.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion.
Councilman Roth asked where the difference of $1550 was going to come
from if approved.
City Manager Talley stated, in addition to the Council's Contingency
Fund, there was the allocation of over $500,000 in the Revenue
Sharing Account. The entire $143,000 would increase to approximately
~143,500 and it would come from that source.
Councilman Overholt stated with due respect to Margaret Sullivan, he
has clients that have had just the opposite experience with Helping
Hands and the organization is a life saver for people who are alone.
His concern in reducing their level of funding is the fact that they
are also going to get cut in their funding level by the United Way
whose funds this year are below expectations and the ability to be
able to serve the elders of the community will be severely hampered.
474
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Bay spoke against the amendment to the recommended funding
level. Without the amendment, there was total agreement in the
funding level with the Community Services Board. The Board was
diligent in looking at all the applications for funding and debated
the issues. He did not see why the Council wished to change them in
some way after all the deliberations of the Board.
A vote was then taken on the motion amending the total amount to $143,456.00
by increasing the amount for H.H.H. $1,550 from $6,500 to $8,050.
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood,
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bay
ABSENT: COUNCIL M~BERS: None
Overholt, Pickler and Roth
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to allocate $5,000 for the Coalition for
Concerned Parents. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion.
Councilman Overholt spoke against the motion although he was
psychologically in support. If the Agency had not made application
to the Anaheim Union High School District for the parental work they
were doing, they have not tapped the resource that would be the most
logical for financial assistance. This is the first time they have
applied. He recommended that they apply again but the next time he
would like to know that they have attempted to obtain funding from
the High School District since the impact of their work would bear
directly on the students. He could be supportive in future years but
this year will go along with the Community Services Board
recommendation.
Mayor Roth called for a vote on the motion. There was no response.
Councilman Pickler thereupon withdrew his motion.
A vote was then taken on the original motion to approve the Community Service
Organization Funding request but amended to increase the total by $1,550 or a
total of $143,456.00. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
City Manager Talley announced that relative to the request of Mr.
William Erickson at the meeting of June 10, 1986, two meetings had
been held with staff and with Mr. Erickson.
William Erickson, 301 East North Street.
Item 3 of his June 5, 1986 letter was never intended to bring about a
drastic change in policy. Relative to taverns in the 2 block area of
north Anaheim Boulevard, he has made accusations of tavern problems.
It is his opinion that Council should investigate to verify or deny
those charges. He will hold any further comments until council
investigates the matter. Relative to the George Washington School,
it was stated that area was taken care of. He challenged that
statement and indicated the problems existing.
Mayor Roth asked if the north Anaheim Boulevard area was going to be
monitored and recommendations made by staff.
475
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 17, 1986, 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Talley answered they were mindful of the situation and Mr.
Erickson was aware of the police activity in the area. They would
continue that activity but he was not making a commitment on what
they were going to do.
Councilman Pickler asked if the Council could be provided with
information concerning the area.
Mr. Talley stated the Council can be provided with police reports as
they have been in the past about incidents observed in the area and
the steps taken.
Ron Bates, Assistant City Manager, stated in working with Mr.
Erickson, the Police Department was well aware of the problems and
those have been documented. They are working with the Alcoholic
Beverage Commission trying to revoke some licenses. The situation
was being handled aggressively but legal requirements are such that
action had to be taken cautiously with all the detailed steps
required for legal prosecution. With regard to the Washington
Center, he has been working with the Parks and Recreation Department
more aggressively to clean up the graffiti. The paint from
Maintenance was at the site and the graffiti will be cleaned on a
daily basis if required.
Mayor Roth stated the Council would look forward to a report from the
Assistant City Manager on the matter and go forward from there.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session
to discuss labor relations matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.6
with no action anticipated. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED. (4:00 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (4:25 p.m.)
ADJOURNMENT: councilman Roth moved to adjourn. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:25 p.m.)
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
476