1985/05/28217
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma~ 28, 1985, 10:00 A.M.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley
ACTING CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
DATA PROCESSING DIRECTOR: Phil Gr-mmatica
CHIEF DESIGN ENGINEER: Art Daw
TRAFFIC ENGINRRR: Paul Singer
PUBLIC UTILITIES GENERAL MANAGER: Gordon Hoyt
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Norm J. Priest
SGT., VICE DETAIL: JAMES BRANTLEY
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ZONING: Anntka Santalahti
Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend David Beadles, United Methodist Church, gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Miriam Kaywood led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: PRESENTATION: Mrs. Fran Mauck, Coordinator of the Mother of the Year
Award, introduced Mrs. Betty Livolti, Anaheim's Mother of the Year. Mrs.
Mauck also read the winning letter submitted by Mrs. Livolti's ten year old
SOn.
Mayor Roth, on behalf of the Council and the City congratulated Mrs. Livolti
and presented her with roses.
119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Roth
and authorized by the City Council:
"Sons of Italy Week" in Anaheim, June 22-30, 1985.
"HtLltl-Housln§ Industry Week" ln Anahelm, June 1-8, 1985
Jean Hollingshead accepted the Multi-Housing Industry Week Proclamation.
119: RESOLUTIONS OF WELCOME: The City Council unanimously adopted
Resolutions of Welcome to be presented to Dana Hollingshead and Heath Scrogum
in conjunction with the Wish for Wings Project instituted by the Kiwanis Club
extending the City's best wishes to Dana and Heath for a wonderful visit to
the City and Disneyland.
MINUTES: Councilman Roth moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
held May 7, 1985. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
399
2].8
Cit7 Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda,
after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to
waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $1,862,857.93, in
accordance with the 1984-85 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilwoman Kaywood
offered Resolution Nos. 85R-209 through 85R-213, both inclusive, for
adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management:
a. Claim submitted by Theresa Torres for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 5, 1985.
b. Claim submitted by George & Mary Barling for indemnity purportedly
due to actions of the City on or about March 16, 1985.
c. Claim submitted by Mrs. Louis Foster for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about February 18, 1985.
d. Claim submitted by Amanda Adams for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about March 1, 1985.
e. Claim submitted by Delores Crawford for personal injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the Police on or about January 11, 1985.
2. Receiving and filing the following correspondence: (on file)
a. 175: Before the Public Utilities Comm~ssion, Application No.
85-05-055 of Southern California Edison Company (U 338-E) for Authority to
change its Energy Cost Adjustment Billing Factors to reflect payments made
pursuant to a lawsuit relating to Edison's long-term low sulfur fuel oil
contract with Chevron U.S.A., Inc.
b. 105: Redevelopment Commission--Minutes of May 8, 1985.
3. 128: Receiving and filing the Monthly Financial Analysis for the
nine-month period ending March 31, 1985.
400
City Hs11~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28, 1985, 10:00 A.M.
4. 123: Authorizing a Joint Agreement with the County of Orange and various
cities, at a cost to the City of $624.45 per month, revising the Law
Enforcement Telecommunications Agreement, to provide for upgrade of the
message switcher in the County's Automatic Teletype System.
5. 155: Approving the Negative Declaration for the construction of a storm
drain in Orangewood Avenue between Mountain View Avenue and Oertley Drive.
6. 155: Approving the Negative Declaration for the Clementine Street, Elm
Street, Helena Street Street Reconstruction and Water Main Replacement Project.
7. 155: Approving the Negative Declaration for the Vermont Avenue Street
Sweeping Debris Transfer Station, to be located at 500 East Vermont Avenue.
8. 123: Authorizing a Short Form Lease agreement with the U.S. Postal
Service at a monthly rate of $1 for installation of a temporary mobile postal
unit on the Stadium parking lot.
9. 108: Approving an application for a Public Dance Hall Permit submitted by
Richard Anthony Monsour for Richies, 951-959 South Knott Street, to have
dances seven days a week from 9:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., in accordance with the
recommendations of the Chief of Police.
10. 106: Setting a date and time for a public hearing on the proposed 1985/86
Resource Allocation Plan. (suggested date: June 11, 1985, 1:30 p.m.)
18. 176: RESOLUTION NO. 85R-210: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS,
HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS. (84-14A) (Declaring intent to abandon a
portion of the original alignment of Hidden Canyon Road, southerly of Serrano
Avenue, with reservation of certain easements and provision for a Knox Box
device in the event a gate should be erected in the future, and setting a date
for the public hearing therefor. (suggested date: July 9, 1985, 1:30 p.m.)
19. 176: RESOLUTION NO. 85R-211: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS,
HIGHWAYS AND SERVICE EASEMENTS. (84-17A) (Declaring intent to abandon a
7-foot wide sewer easement no longer in use at the southeast corner of Harbor
Boulevard and Broadway, and setting a date for the public hearing therefor.
(suggested date: July 9, 1985, 1:30 p.m.)
20. 137: RESOLUTION NO. 85R-212: A RESOLUTION CALLING FOR BIDS FOR NOTES,
APPROVING DISTRIBUTION OF OFFICIAL STATEMENT, NOTICE OF SALE AND BID FORM, AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING CERTAIN ACTIONS WITH RESPECT THERETO. (Authorizing
calling for bids for 1985 Tax and Revenue Anticipation Notes in the amount of
$22,125,000, approving distribution of Official Statement, Notice of Sale and
Bid For, and authorizing and directing certain actions with respect thereto.
401
216
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma~ 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
21. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 85R-213: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A CERTAIN DEED AND ORDERING ITS RECORDATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 85R-210 through 85R-213, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
End of Consent Calendar. MOTION CARRIED
123/125: CONTRACT PROGRAMMING SERVICES FOR THE DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT:
Councilman Bay expressed his opinion that the major expenditures being
proposed should be a part of the budget approval and should not be considered
prior to the Council's seeing the budget. He felt that this item along with
two others on today's Agenda should be continued to be considered in
conjunction with the budget; Phil Grammatica, Data Processing Director,
explained the reasons why the items were being presented at this time. See
report dated May 28, 1985 from the Data Processing Director recommending that
the agreements be authorized and discussing the reasons.
Councilman Overholt moved to authorize the following: (1) agreements with
Computer Systems & Applications and Sizemore Computer Services in amounts not
to exceed $150,000 each, for data processing contract programming services for
the Utility Billing System effort, commencing June 1, 1985 and ending June 30,
1986 and (2) agreements with John Cappelletti Associates and DPCS, Inc., in
amounts not to exceed $300,000 and $100,000 respectively, for data processing
contract programming services for the City's General Systems Effort,
commencing June 1, 1985 and ending June 30, 1986 as recommended in memorandum
dated 5/28/85 from the Data Processing Director. Councilman Pickler seconded
the motion. Councilman Bay voted no. MOTION CARRIED.
151: ENCROACHMENT LICENSE FOR V-SHAPED ADVERTISING SIGN AT 528 WEST LINCOLN
AVENUE: Authorizing an Encroachment License with Abe R. and Helen 1. Rader to
allow encroachment over the sidewalk of a v-shaped advertising sign visible to
both east and west traffic on Llncoln Avenue, at 528 West Llncoln Avenue,
84-5E as recommended in memorandum dated May 20, 1985 from the City Engineer,
Gary Johnson. Councilman Pickler expressed his concern relative to
encroachments over sidewalks and questioned why the request was necessary in
this case; Art Daw, Chief Design Engineer, and Jack White, Acting City
Attorney answered the questions posed at the conclusion of which Councilman
Pickler moved to continue the request for one week so that additional
information could be provided. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
155: NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR HARBOR BOULEVARD MEDIAN ISLAND: Approving the
Negative Declaration for the construction of a landscaped median island in
Harbor Boulevard from Broadway to Vermont Avenue as recommended in memorandum
dated May 14, 1985 from the City Engineer.
402
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
Karl Richardson, 8942 Katella Avenue, stated that his ambulance service
serviced the residents at Casa Pacifica Convalescent Hospital and installing a
divider at that location would be not only an inconvenience, but also a matter
of life and death because the ambulance would have to take a longer route to
get to Casa Pacifica and out to the area hospitals.
Paul Singer, Traffic Engineer, explained that over the past many years the
traffic volumes on Harbor Boulevard had grown substantially and by installing
the median islands would more efficiently process the traffic and reduce
collisions at left turn locations.
Ruth N. Bruce, representing Casa Pacifica Convalescent Home, 861 North Harbor
Boulevard, agreed with Mr. Richardson. Timing was critical in getting
patients to the hospital. She suggested that a left turn lane be constructed
for entrance into the facility.
Mr. Singer stated that he would have to analyze the situation more closely
because any left turn other than at intersections was going to create
additional possibilities for collisions; Ms. Bruce asked that Mr. Simger
contact Casa Pacifica after he did so.
Mayor Roth was concerned that should the median be built, it was scheduled to
be done in August which was one of the busiest of seasons with some 30 million
tourists visiting Anaheim. He asked if there was any way to do so, that the
project be delayed at least a couple of weeks; Art Daw, Chief Design Engineer,
explained the reason for the timing of the project but also reported that it
might be delayed because the initial construction would involve the
installation of a water line.
Councilman Bay asked for more detail on exactly where the median was going to
go in order to get a better picture of the impact of the median on businesses
in that area.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to continue approval of the Negative Declaration
for the construction of the landscaped median island at Harbor Boulevard, from
Broadway to Vermont Avenue for one week. Councilman Overholt seconded the
motion. MOTION CAP, LIED.
123/125/152~ VOLUM~ PURCHASE AGR~T - DATA PROCESSING DEPARTMENT: Data
Processing Director, Phil Grammatica, answered questions posed by Councilman
Bay for purposes of clarification.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to authorize the Data Processing Director to
execute a Volume Purchase Agreement with IBM for the purchase of IBM terminals
and printers currently in use as recommended in memorandum dated May 21, 1985
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
175: REPORT ON LIFELINE RATE CHARTER AMENDMENT: Receiving and filing a
report on the Lifeline Rate Charter Amendment.
Councilman Bay, noting from the minutes of the Public Utilities Board (PUB)
meeting (also see report dated May 1§, 1985 from the Assistant GeneralManager
- Management Services of the Public Utilities Department to the Public
403
214
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
Utilities Board - Subject: Lifeline Rate Charter Amendment) that a great deal
of staff work had been ongoing to try to find some way to present a Charter
amendment in order to, in his opinion, socialize a portion of the utilities.
He did not understand where the pressure to do so was coming from or the
political wave in order for staff and special counsel to be working so
diligently to come up with a way to circumvent the bond covenants to set up a
charity payback on utilities with which he completely disagreed.
Gordon Hoyt, Public Utilities General Manager, agreed that there seemed to be
no ground swell of support; however, the PUB and the Council did commission
the study by the Ad Hoc Lifeline Committee. He then explained the activities
that had taken place in preparing the subject amendment. The matter was
presented to the PUB at their meeting of May 16, 1985 and continued to the
meeting of June 6, 1985. The pressure had come from at least one member of
the Ad Hoc Lifeline Committee.
Councilman Overholt, stating his general opinion, was personally opposed to
any permanent program. To get into an ongoing program of subsidizing certain
categories of rate payers would result in larger long-term problems.
Councilman Pickler felt the matter was something he wanted to consider and
perhaps place the issue on the ballot; Mayor Roth stated until the City of
Anaheim Utilities rates are at least even with Edison, he was not interested
in furthering any more studies on the subject matter.
Mr. Hoyt confirmed that the PUB had not considered the matter as yet but did
receive the documentation at their last meeting and the issue would be
discussed at the June 6, 1985 meeting where the Board may have a
recommendation at that time or ask for additional information. The study
would probably proceed to a conclusion with the PUB making their
recommendation.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to receive and file the report on the Lifeline
Rate Charter Amendment proposal. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
175/123: PUBLIC UTILITIES DEPARTMENT - COMMUNICATION PLAN: Approving the
Public Utilities Department Communication Master Plan; authorizing an
agreement with Jacqueline Schaar Associates in an amount not to exceed
$162,000 for consulting services to assist in the implementation of the Plan
for a period of 18 months; and waiving Council Policy No. 401 relative to
competitive bids as recommended in memorandum dated May 14, 1985 from the
Public Utilities Board (PUB).
Councilman Bay again expressed his concern that he felt first that the
proposal was "putting the cart before the horse" and that it should be part of
the budget approval; Mayor Roth stated that the proposed agreement had not
been passed through the PUB and, further, that it was too expensive.
Gordon Hoyt, Public Utilities General Manager, explained that the subject
communications plan was included in the current Resource Allocation Plan
(RAP), but they were proposing a substantial addition to that. The numbers
4O4
Pll
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
were large and represented an increase over the current RAP, and to that
extent, it was reviewed by the PUB when the budget was approved last year.
After additional discussion and questioning of Mr. Hoyt by Council members,
Councilman Overholt moved to continue authorization of the subject agreement
with Jacqueline Schaar for one week to give the Council an opportunity to look
at the proposal in greater detail. Councilman Bay seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
174: ELEVENTH YEAR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT APPLICATION:
Authorizing the City Manager to execute and file an application for a
Community Development Block Grant pursuant to the Housing and Community
Development Act of 1980, amended in 1983, as recommended in the memorandum
dated May 21, 1985 from the Community Development Department.
Councilman Bay voiced his concern relative to the use, in his opinion, of one
of the Neighborhood Council's Quarterly Newsletter, for political purposes.
Norm Priest, Director of Community Development and Planning then explained for
Councilman Overholt that the item that Councilman Bay referred to was
published during the last councilmanic election campaign announcing a meeting
suggesting points of view that seemed to lean or favor one candidate or
another. Handbills were produced by members of the Neighborhood Council
Committee but not sanctioned or were not a part of the budget under
discussion. The departmental staff was and had been very careful recognizing
that the use of Block Grant Funds prohibited the use of those funds for
political purposes. In one case, staff would not provide equipment for one of
the meetings because it was evident it was designed around councilmanic
campaigns. With respect to the Newsletter, staff reviewed the copy but did
not edit it.
Councilman Overholt stated he would be concerned also if a Neighborhood
Council, a concept which the City had worked hard to develop, were to be used
by members in those Councils for political purposes which was self defeating.
Mr. Priest pointed out that the funding of a quarterly council newsletter out
of the administrative budget was not contained in the overall Block Grant
budget submitted to HUD. He recommended~ therefore, that the Council go
forward with the application.
Councilman Bay stated that he had no problem with the resolution proposed for
adoption this date but that policy direction be clarified within the next
month by the Council to staff relative to the newsletter.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 85R-209 for adoption approving the Final
Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds in
the amount of $3,158,000 and authorizing the City Manager to execute and file
said application for the llth Year Community Development Block Grant pursuant
to the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980, amended 1983. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 85R-209: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT
4O5
212
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
PURSUANT TO THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1980, AMENDED 1983,
AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND FILE THE APPLICATION THEREFOR.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
AB SENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 85R-209 duly passed and adopted.
175: PARTICIPATION IN THE CALIFORNIA PLAN FOR THE COMMERCIAL AND APARTMENT
CONSERVATION SERVICE (CACS): Authorizing participation in the California
State Plan for the Commercial and Apartment Conservation Service (CACS) and
authorizing the Public Utilities General Manager to submit proof of said
authorization to the California Energy Commission are recommended in
memorandum dated 5/21/85 from the Secretary of the Public Utilities Board.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution 85R-214 for adoption. Refer to the
Resolution Book.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, 0verholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 85R-214 duly passed and adopted.
175/123: INTERIM COST SHARING AGREEMENT - CALIFORNIA-OREGON TRANSMISSION
PROJECT: Councilman Pickler moved to approve the Interim Cost Sharing
Agreement at a cost not to exceed $49,500 or 3.33 percent to the City for the
California-Oregon Transmission Project as recommended in memorandum of May
20, 1985 from the Secretary of the Public Utilities Board. Councilman
Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: The City Attorney requested a Closed Session to
discuss potential and pending litigationwith no action anticipated.
108: PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT-NEW GENERATION PRODUCTIONS: Councilman Pickler
moved to ratify the City Manager's Office approval of an application for a
Public Dance submitted by Nick Ramirez for New Generation Productions to hold
a public dance at the Anaheim Convention Center on May 26, 1985, from 7:00
p.m. to 1:00 a.m. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
179: DISCUSSION-PROPOSED BILLBOARD SIGN ORDINANCE: Mr. Floyd L. Farano,
Farano and Kieviet, representing Regency Outdoor Sign Company submitted data
entitled - "The Proposed Ordinance" which proposes to accomplish the following:
1. Permits Signs on Freeways
a. In Limited Numbers
406
2O9
Cit7 Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
b. In Limited Locations
2. Provides for C.U.P. as to all Future Signs
3. Provides Revenue to the City
4. Will Reduce the Number of Signs in Anaheim
5. Places a Limitation on the Number of Signs
The documentation also included a comparison study, Present vs. Proposed
Billboard Ordinances and Recap of Potential Billboard Structure Locations
Under Proposed Ordinance Revision along with Exhibits A through F showing
exclusionary areas and available areas for billboard signs (documents on file
in the City Clerk's Office). Mr. Farano then supplemented his presentation
with slides which included a briefing of each of the exhibits submitted. At
the conclusion of his presentation, he answered questions posed by
Councilmembers and then requested that the Council give first reading to the
proposed ordinances he submitted with his letter of May 3, 1985 adding a new
Chapter 3.202, Title 3, of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to advertising
and amending certain sections of Title 18 pertaining to billboards. (Also see
resume of proposed Advertising Ordinance, Chapter 3.20 - Anaheim Municipal
Code and resume of proposed Billboard Ordinance, Chapter 18.05.110 et seq -
non-freeway billboards and freeway billboards attached to the proposed
ordinances).
The following people then spoke in support of the ordinances as proposed by
Mr. Farano on behalf of Regency Outdoor Sign Company: Mr. Gerald M. Greco,
Stadium Motors, 2225 East Katella; Tim Sullivan, President, KEZY, 1190 East
Ball Road; Shep McCook, United Outdoor Advertising, 1717 Orangewood Avenue,
Orange.
It was determined by a consensus of the Council upon completion of the
presentations that in order to discuss the matter further staff be directed to
submit a report relative to the proposals submitted and that other outdoor
advertising companies be informed of any future discussion of the issue.
Councilwoman Kaywood expressed her concern that the proposed ordinances were
prepared by the applicant and not prepared by City Attorney staff; that the
matter of freeway billboards had been discussed at length over a long period
of time just last year and unanimously rejected by the Council; staff had
previously submitted a report, and the issue was one of the most extensively
debated topics.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to continue discussion of the proposed
billboard sign ordinance to Tuesday, July 16, 1985; and that staff submit a
report on the proposals submitted, and that other outdoor advertising
companies be notified of the next discussion. Councilman Overholt seconded
the motion. Councilwoman Kaywood voted no. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: The City Attorney requested a Closed Session to
discuss pending litigation and personnel matters with no action anticipated.
407
210
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
The Mayor announced that a closed session would be held with the City's
attorneys to discuss the foregoing matters pursuant to Government Code section
54956.9Awith no action anticipated.
Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session and a lunch break.
Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (12:32 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (1:50 p.m.)
108/142: ORDINANCE NOS. 4616 THROUGH 4618 - FORTUNETELLING BUSINESSES:
Councilman Roth offered Ordinances 4616 through 4618, both inclusive for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4616: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
REPEALING CHAPTER 4.40 OF TITLE 4 AND ENACTING A NEW CHAPTER 4.40 OF TITLE 4
OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO FORTUNETELLING.
ORDINANCE NO. 4617: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ADDING NEW CHAPTER 3.80 OF TITLE 3 RELATING TO FORTUNETELLING OR SIMILAR
BUSINESSES. (Establishing a $300 fee in connection with fortunetelltng or
similar businesses)
ORDINANCE NO. 4618: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING CERTAIN
SECTIONS OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING TO PROVIDE FOR
FORTUNETELLING BUSINESSES. (Amending Section 18.41.020, 18.44.060 and
18.44.035 of the Code, to permit fortunetelling business)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES'.
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, 0verholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 4616 through 4618, both inclusive,
passed and adopted.
179: PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2672 AND NEGATIVE
duly
DECLARATION:
APPLICANT:
E.D.G.A. Enterprises
1990 Westwood Boulevard
Los Angeles, California
Les E. Lederer, Owner
90025
ZONING/LOCATION/REQUEST: To permit an entertainment facility for teenagers on
ML zoned property located at 1490 South Anaheim Boulevard, with Code waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Resolution PC85-96 granted Conditional Use Permit
2672 for two years to expire April 15, 1987. Approved EIR - Negative
Declaration.
4O8
°07
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
HEARING SET ON:
Review requested by Councilman Pickler at the meeting of May 7, 1985.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIAEMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin May 16, 1985.
Posting of property May 17, 1985.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - May 16, 1985.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated April 15, 1985.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT:
John Schroeder, 1839 Bayless Street, Anaheim. He is the owner of
Nlghtscape, the under 21 club located in the Fashion Square Shopping
Center in Santa Aha. He would be leasing the proposed building
(Dandel's) and will be running the operation as he had done at two
other locations over the past five years. He then stated his case
for the need of a non-alcoholic entertainment facility for
teenagers. His proposed facility will be run similar to
Nightscape. There will be only recorded entertainment, hours
8:30 p.m to 1:00 a.m., Friday and Saturday nights, additional nights
will be school holidays or vacations, only for those under 21 years
of age, he is agreeing to follow the guidelines recommended by the
Anaheim Police Department (see report dated March 27, 1985 from the
Chief of Police, page 2), his security people are trained and State
licensed, there will be a dress code, and a physical search of each
person before entering. He then gave his personal background and
submitted letters of support also attesting to his personal
character and his capability in running a teenage entertainment
facility such as Nightscape especially with emphasis on the security
and supervision provided.
COUNCIL CONCERNS:
Councilman Pickler.
Me set the matter for Public Hearing.on the basis of the police
report submitted (see report dated March 27, 1985 from the Chief of
Police).
STAFF INPUT:
Sergeant James Brantley.
Of the 67 incidents covered in the March 27, 1985 report, in
speaking with Lieutenant Greg Cooper of Santa Ana earlier this
afternoon after Mr. Schroeder had conferred with him, it was
determined that 11 incidents could be attributed to Nightscape over
the time alluded to in the report. He confirmed for Councilman
Pickler that the Anaheim Police Department had not changed its
attitude regarding the matter.
Paul Singer, Traffic Engineer.
The Parking Study indicates that there will be adequate parking
subject to the applicant obtaining an agreement with the property
owner for parking available on the Pacific Stereo lot adjacent to
409
308
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
the subject building. His concermwas with the possibility of a
large influx of people compounded by the security that will take
place on the parking lot discouraging patrons from parking on that
lot. They will then try to park on the street or adjacent
businesses across the street creating a potential pedestrian problem.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - IN FAVOR:
Dr. Dawn Ahart, 2937 East Roberta Drive, Orange, Chairman of
Community Against Substance Abuse (C.A.S.A.) Task Force; James
Driver, 18591 Woodwind; Marilyn Murany, 2146 West Pacific Avenue.
They spoke to the need for facilities where teenagers could go and
socialize in a supervised, substance-free atmosphere.
Mr. Michael Dombrowski, managing partner, Main Street Shopping
Center, 2730 North Main Street, Santa Ama.
Mr. Schroeder's non-alcoholic nightclub use was the nicest type of
use from a landlord's point of view. Complaints were very minimal
and few and far between. Mr. Schroeder is responsive, upfront and
forthright.
It was determined by a show of hands that approximately 20 people
were present in the Chamber audience in favor of Conditional Use
Permit 2672.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - IN OPPOSITION:
None.
COMMENTS BY APPLICANT IN ANSWER TO COUNCIL QUESTIONS: John Schroeder.
The report received from Santa Ana had been misconstrued. He then
explained and/or rebutted some of the incidents attributed to
Nightscape. Of the 11 calls, 8 or 9 were actually initiated by
Nightscape.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Roth closed the Public Hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Pickler, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council approved the negative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler.
He was going to offer a resolution approving the Conditional Use Permit with
the conditions listed by the Police Department in the March 27, 1985 report
which limited the Conditional Use Permit to one year but amending it to one
year from the date of opening.
Cit7 ~m~ Am~hetm~ Cml~fornia - COUNCI~ ~LINUTES - Ha7 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
Jack White, Acting City Attorney.
Relative to restricting the Conditional Use Permit to Mr. Schroeder as
questioned by Councilman Overholt, that situation had never been addressed by
any court in California. Conditional Use Permits run with the land rather
than the applicant. He would not recommend restricting the permit so that it
would not be transferable with a change of ownership.
Councilman Overholt.
He asked Mr. Schroeder if the Council granted the Conditional Use Permit if he
would be willing to limit it to the time he ($chroeder) would personally be
managing the facility.
John Schroeder.
In speaking with the property owner, he was suggesting, if the Council was
limiting his ability in being able to be a businessman and move about that a
time limit be set in the lease agreement where the owner would not lease to
anyone else but him for said use in exchange for a longer period of time for
the club to operate. If he had a two-year period in which to operate in order
to recapture his investment, that would be acceptable to him.
Councilman Overholt:
The condition attached by the Police Department is that the permit be renewed
at the end of one year and the landlord was saying if the Council gave the
club a two-year life, he would allow Mr. Schroeder to agree to his continued
presence. He (0verholt) would not accept that negotiation but rather limit it
tO one year.
Councilman Bay:
A Conditional Use Permit could be revoked for cause at any time. He suggested
taking advantage of the two year time period locking the management down to
Mr. Schroeder. Many of the decisions to be made were based on the way the
club was going to operate, and were primarily based on the recommendations of
numerous people on the way Mr. Schroeder operates. The Conditional Use Permit
should be tied to him even if it is for two years; Councilwoman Kaywood
suggested a two year approval with a one year review.
Jack White, Acting City Attorney.
Clarified that at the end of the two year period, a new Public Hearing would
be required at which time the Council would consider whether to extend the
permit for an additional period. At any time, the Council has the right to
review on its own discretion the particular use. This would be calendared
automatically one year from the date Mr. Schroeder opens his operation and
brought back to the City Council not as a Public Hearing, but simply on the
Council Agenda to remind them that one year had passed, to look at the
situation and perhaps set the matter for a hearing for due cause or allow the
business to continue the use for the balance of the two year term.
Councilman Pickler offered Resolution No. 85R-215 for adoption, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 2672, subject to City Planning Commission
conditions but amended as follows: that the permit is granted for two years
starting from the date of opening of the facility and subject to a review by
the Council at the end of one year and that Mr. Schroeder remain as manager
during that period of time. Refer to Resolution Book.
411
206
City Ba]]~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 85R-215: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2672.
Roi1 Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 85R-215 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: By general consent, the Council recessed for five minutes.
(2:55 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (3:00 p.m.)
179: VARIANCE NO. 3473 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT: Cyprien and Catherine Duhart
888 South Lemon, Anaheim 92805
ZONING LOCATION REQUEST: to construct a 2-unit addition to an existing single
family dwelling on RM-2400 zoned property located at 869 South Lemon Street,
with the following Code waivers: (a) Maximum fence height, (b) Minimum side
yard setback and minimum width of pedestrian accessways, (c) Required type of
parking spaces, (d) Vehicular backing onto public streets.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Resolution PC85-102 granted Variance No. 3473,
approved EIR - negative declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
Review requested by Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of May 7, 1985.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin May 16, 1985.
Posting of property May 17, 1985.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - May 17, 1985.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated April 15, 1985.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT:
Ulysses Bauer, 17390 McAllister, Riverside, the owner's architect.
They have attempted to comply with all the rules and regulations in
adding the two units to the existing single-family dwelling.
COUNCIL CONCERNS:
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Mr. Bauer had called her and answered her concerns especially
relative to vehicular backing on to public streets. She asked if
staff had any problems with vehicles backing out.
412
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Ma~ 28~ 1985, 10:00 A.M.
A~ika Santalahti, Assistant Director for Zoning.
The Traffic Engineer was not as concerned about this location as he
might have been in areas with heavier traffic.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - IN FAVOR:
None.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - OPPOSED:
None.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Roth closed the Public Hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Uouncil approved the
negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative
declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process, and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 85R-216 for adoption, granting
Variance No. 3473, subject to City Planning Commission conditions. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 85R-216: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 3473.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, 0verholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 85R-216 duly passed and adopted.
179: VARIANCE NO. 3475 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT: Mark and Sue Ann Cross, 599 Paseo De Luna, Anaheim 92807.
ZONING LOCATION REQUEST: To establish a 2-lot, RS-5,000(SC) zoned
single-family subdivision on property located at 599 Paseo de Luna, with Code
waiver of minimum building site width for cul-de-sac lots.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Resolution No. PC85-103 granted Variance No.
3475, approved EIR - negative declaration.
HEARING SET ON:
Review requested by Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of May 7, 1985.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin by May 16, 1985.
Posting of property May 17, 1985.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - May 17, 1985.
413
204
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated April 15, 1985.
City Clerk, Leonora N. Sohl.
Upon the request of Mr. Cross, she gave to the Council for their
review tract maps, photographs and letters previously sent to the
Planning Commission which Mr. Cross would refer to in his
presentation.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT:
Mark Cross, 599 Paseo De Luna.
He had another letter dated May 20, 1985 from the Fire Marshall
which he submitted and pictures previously submitted were an
important part of his presentation because they showed other similar
properties in the area which had been developed in the same manner
as he proposed.
COUNCIL CONCERNS:
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Her concern was a number of the lots were initially sold as one lot
even though they were beyond the acreage necessary for the minimum
because the large portion was unbuildable. Steep, unbuildable lots
might pose a danger with regard to slides or something of that
nature. She had also talked to Mr. Cross regarding the difficulty
fire equipment might have getting to the structure but the letter
from the Fire Marshall indicated that since Mr. Cross had agreed to
completely fire sprinkler the new home, the site plans as submitted
were acceptable.
STAFF INPUT:
Jack White, Acting City Attorney.
Even if the Variance is granted, the City will review, in connection
with the parcel map that will be required, the suitability of the
property for development as two separate building sites. One of the
criteria is that the property is physically suitable for the
development proposed and also a grading plan will be required by the
City Engineer as to whether or not the grading conforms with all
applicable ordinances. Therefore, other discretionary approvals are
required. The purpose of today's hearing is to determine if the lot
width requirement should be waived.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - IN FAVOR:
None.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION - OPPOSED:
None.
COUNCIL ACTION:
Mayor Roth closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Council approved the
414
20!
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985, 10:00 A.M.
negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative
declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process, and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 85R-217 for adoption granting
Variance No. 3475, subject to City Planning Commission conditions. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 85R-217: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 3475.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 85R-217 duly passed and adopted.
179:. CONTINUED REHEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2460~ 2461AND 2462:
APPLICANT: Riviera Mobilehome Parks, (a Joint venture), 300 West Katella
Avenue, Anaheim, CA.
ZONING/LOCATION/REQUEST: To add, amend or delete conditions of approval of
Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2460, 2461 and 2462 on proposed RM-1000 zoned
property located at 300 West Katella Avenue. CUP 2460, to permit a 17-story,
852 room hotel; CUP 2461, to permit two 14-story office complexes; CUP 2462,
to permit two 180-unit condominium towers.
Environmental Impact Report No. 262 relating to the subject conditional use
permits was certified by the City Council at their meeting of January 24, 1984
as being in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act along
with the Statement of Overriding Consideration.
HEARING SET ON:
Council meeting of February 28, 1984. Review requested by Councilman Pickler
and rehearing granted by the Council relative to certain requested amendments
at the meeting of April 3, 1984 and continued from the meetings of May 15,
June 5, July 24, October 9, November 27, December 18, 1984, February 12,
March 5, April 16, May 7 and May 14, 1985 to this date (see minutes those
dates).
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin February 2, 1985.
Posting of property February 1, 1985.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - January 31, 1985.
STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report from the Planning Department/Planning Division dated
December 11, 1984 and February 26, 1985; Staff Report from City Attorney's
Office dated February 6, 1985 and April 8, 1985.
415
202
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Pickler.
He suggested a two week continuance. The Council liaison had since
met and another meeting was scheduled for Thursday.
Councilman 0verholt.
He gave a brief status update on the negotiations taking place with
the applicant and the FuJishiges and recommended a one week
continuance.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT:
Floyd Farano, Attorney representing Riviera Mobilehome Parks.
They had not heard from the Fujishiges but were scheduled to be meeting with
them on Thursday.
It was determined that no one was present to be heard on the subject.
MOTION: Councilman Pickier moved to continue the rehearing on Conditional Use
Permit No. 2460, 2461 and 2462 for one week to June 4, 1985 at 1:00 p.m.
Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
170: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10985--EXTENSION OF TIME: Application submitted by
Kaufman and Broad of Southern California, Inc., requesting an extension of
time to Tentative Tract No. 10985, to establish a 2-lot, 234-unit RM-3000(SC)
zoned subdivision on property located southeast of the intersection of Santa
Aha Canyon Road and the proposed southerly extension of Weir Canyon Road.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Tentative Tract
No. 10985 to expire June 13, 1986. This matter was submitted for
informational purposes only. No action taken by the Council.
108/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4614: Councilman Pickier offered Ordinance No. 4614
for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4614: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AMENDING CHAPTER 4.53 OF TITLE 4 PERTAINING TO CARNIVALS AND CIRCUSES.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEI~IBF. Z$:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kayw00d, Bay, Pickler, 0verholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4614 duly passed and adopted.
149/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4615: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4615 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4615: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AMENDING SECTION 14.32.310 OF CHAPTER 14.32 OF TITLE 14 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO RETAILING MERCHANDISE FROM A PARKED VEHICLE.
(Amending Section 14.32.310 of the Code, pertaining to #For Sale Signs# on
vehicles parked on public streets)
416
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28, 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MF2/BERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4615 duly passed and adopted.
144: STATUS UPDATE - EASTERN CORRIDOR: Councilman Bay reported that he
attended the Eastern Corridor scoping meeting held at Canyon High School on
Tuesday evening, May 28, 1985 with approximately 60 people in attendance. He
read the motions passed by the Council (see minutes of the Council Meeting of
May 28, 1985) and the reasons behind those motions and gave a briefing. The
Council had received a report on that meeting. He had not heard about any new
meetings being planned nor whether the "boiler-plate" ordinance on fees had
been received but assumed that action would again be necessary in a few weeks.
173: PROPOSED SHORT RAIL TRANSIT: Councilman Bay referred to the proposed
short-rail transit idea coming out of the Orange County Transportation
Commission and the Orange County Transit District of approximately 13 miles
starting somewhere in the area of Anaheim going south to South Coast Plaza.
He had not seen the details of that proposal but felt that the City should
start looking at the proposed plan.
106: 1985/86 - 1986/87 RESOURCE ALLOCATION PLAN (RAP): City Manager, William
O. Talley stated it was with a great deal of pleasure that he introduced the
first two-year RA~ in the City's history, 1985/86, 1986/87 RAP (budget). He
explained that key highlights of the plan were going to be presented on video
tape and the written plan itself would be submitted after the video
presentation.
The video consisted of an overview and highlights of each City Department's
budget for two-year RAP by the Department head in the following order: Fire
Chief, Bob Simpson, Fire Department; City Clerk, Leonora Sohl, City Clerk's
Office; Public Utilities General Manager, Gordon Hoyt, Public Utilities
Department; Finance Director, George Ferrone, Finance Department; Director of
Community Development and Planning, Norm Priest, Community Development and
Planning; Library Director, William Griffith, Library Department; Acting City
Attorney, Jack White, City Attorney's Office; Maintenance Director, John
Roche, Facility Maintenance; Director of Parks, Recreation and Community
Services, Chris Jarvi, Department of Parks, Recreation and Community Services;
Data Processing Director, Phil Gr~mm~tica, Data Processing Department; Human
Resources Director, Garry McRae, Human Resources Department; City Engineer,
Gary Johnson, Engineering Department; General Manager, Stadium-Convention
Center-Golf (Fmmtly Foresome) Tom Liegler, Anaheim Stadium, Convention Center
and Golf Courses (Dad Miller and Anaheim Hills); City Treasurer, Mary Turner,
Treasurer's Office; Chief of Police, Jimmie Kennedy, Police Department;
Assistant City Manager, Ron Bates, Administration.
City Manager Talley explained that after Council approved the plan, the video
would be re-edited with any changes made by the Council during budget hearings
and also to allow for Council to be cut into certain sections, making a total
417
200
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 28~ 1985~ 10:00 A.M.
package which could then be distributed to community groups. Storer Cable TV
also wanted to broadcast the presentation for the citizens of Anaheim.
Mr. Talley then officially presented what he considered the finest budget a
municipality ever produced, a two-year plan patterned after the Executive
S-mmary of last year, 69 pages long and, with the exception of a few necessary
pages where there were listings of columns of figures that were mandatory, the
rest was "state of the art' as far as presentation of information not only to
the Council, but also to any citizen group or person who wanted to look at
what Anaheim was all about. The traditional line item data was also being
submitted and a copy placed in the City Clerk's office for inspection along
with the plan document. Within the next day or two, the same presentation
would be made to the Blue Ribbon Budget Committee of the Chamber of Commerce.
The RAP adoption schedule submitted under date of May 24, 1985 recommended
that the first public hearing on the plan be held Tuesday, June 11, 1985 at
1:30 p.m. He then briefed the remainder of the schedule.
Mr. Talley continued that there were approximately 11 additional policy issues
included in the document. Five were listed in the Capital Improvement Plan
previously submitted and presented to the Council. The 11 additional issues
were noted under the following departments and pages of the submitted plan:
policy issues - Public Information Office, page 22; Library, page 39; Fire
Department, page 45; Community Development and Planning/Administration, page
47; Business License, page 50; Public Works/Engineering, page 53; Parks,
Recreation/Community Services, page 55; Recreation, page 56 (two issues);
Parks Maintenance, page 57; Family Foresome/Convention Center, page 60.
During the budget hearings, policy determinations would be solicited on those
issues.
The Mayor commended staff on behalf of the Council for an informative and well
done presentation.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to adopt the schedule of hearings and
workshops regarding the proposed 1985/86 and 1986/87 Resource Allocation Plan
submitted under date of May 24, 1985. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: By general consent the Council recessed to Closed
Session. (4:42 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (4:58 p.m.)
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Roth moved to adjourn. Councilman 0verholt seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:59 p.m.)
418