1983/02/08City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
~SE~:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MMMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
COUNCIL MMMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
ASSISTANT TO THE CITY MANAGER: James Armstrong
STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER/GOLF GENERAL MANAGER: Thomas Liegler
TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Paul Singer
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR--PLANNING: Joel Fick
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR--ZONING: Annika Santalahti
Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: The Reverend Ron Winckler, Hotline Help Center at Melodyland,
gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ben Bay led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Roth
and authorized by the City Council:
Engineers Week in Anaheim, February 20-26, 1983.
National Crime Prevention Week in Anaheim, February 6-12, 1983.
National School Guidance Week in Anaheim, February 7-11, 1983.
The Engineers Week proclamation was accepted by Bob Cammack; the National
Crime Prevention Week proclamation was accepted by Acting Chief of Police
Jimmie Kennedy; and the National School Guidance Week proclamation was
accepted by Marvin Gold.
MINUTES: Councilman Bay moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting
held January 18, 1983. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda,
after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to
waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Overholt seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL D~MANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of ~1,782,859.43, in
accordance with the 1982-83 Budget, were approved.
81
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
CITY MANAGER/DEPAR/MENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Overholt,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilman Overholt
offered Resolution Nos. 83R-39 through 83R-43, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
A. Claims denied and referred to Risk Management:
1. Claim submitted by Craig M. Ott for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to a fall at Anaheim Stadium, on or about September 21, 1982.
2. Claim submitted by Mr. D. Weber for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to a power surge at 1805 West Ball Road, #1, on
or about November 30, 1982.
3. Claim submitted by Manuel Marruto for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to a power surge at 946 North West Street, on or
about December 1, 1982.
4. Claim submitted by Barbara Hahne for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to a power outage at 2447 East Alden Avenue, on
or about November 30 and December 1, 1982.
B. Applications for Leave to Present a Late Claim denied:
5. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Terra
Trucking for equitable indemnification for an incident which took place at
or near the entrance to the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station on
Basilone Road, San Diego County, on or about April 23, 1982.
6. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Michael
Spelman for personal injuries purportedly sustained due to a slip-and-fall
accident at Anaheim Stadium, on or about May 16, 1982.
C. Claims denied and referred to Governmental Programs Division, Markel
Service, Inc.:
7. Claim submitted by Otis L. Barnett for towing charges on travel
trailer purportedly sustained due to wrongful enforcement of Anaheim
Municipal Code at the rear of the 76 Union Service Station, Harbor and
Katella, on or about November 2, 1982.
8. Claim submitted by Susan Davis Faber-Smith for personal injuries
purportedly caused by City employees at 1497 North Highland, #B, Orange,
on or about August 30, 1982.
82
City Hall, Anmheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
9. Claim submitted by Michael Anthony DeRaddo for personal injuries and
false imprisonment purportedly sustained due to actions of Anaheim Police
Officer at 1863 Random Street, on or about October 5, 1982.
2. The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. 105: Park and Recreation Commission--Minutes of December 8, 1982.
3. 173: Requesting the Orange County Transportation Commission (OCTC) to
fund a Katella Avenue Corridor Study in Fiscal Year 1983/84.
4. 123: Authorizing an agreement with the Kaiser Foundation Hospital for an
easement of public access from Maychelle Drive along the easterly portion of
the Hospital property to the existing riding and hiking trail located along
the Santa Ana River, R/W 3056.
5. 107: Continuing the award of Building Demolition, 518 South Anaheim
Boulevard, Account Nos. 55-650-6325-86060-R9000 and 53-619-6329-90240-31500,
to February 15, 1983.
6. 160: Authorizing the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order to MGM
Transformer in the amount of $15,767.50 for one 1500KVA dual voltage
transformer required by the Convention Center.
7. 160: Accepting the low bid of Pac Power in the amount of $21,322.21 for
the remanufacture of one sixty-five foot aerial manlift in accordance with Bid
No. 3935.
8. 160: Accepting the Iow bid of Rafferty International in the amount of
$55,481.89 for three 24,000-pound GVW tilt cab/chassis, in accordance with Bid
No. 3937.
9. 160: Accepting the bids of Westinghouse Electric Corp. in the amount of
$66,404.76 for four each 150KVA, four each 225KVA and two each 300KVA
three-phase padmount transformers, Item Nos. 1, 2 and 3; and McGraw Edison in
the amount of ~21,928.22 for one each 2000KVA three-phase padmount
transformer, Item No. 4; in accordance with Bid No. 3940.
10. 160: Accepting the low hid oF Pacific §tate~ Ca~t Iron Ptp~ Co. in an
amount not to exceed ~21,405.44 for 1,026 feet of 16-inch, Class 51, ductile
iron pipe, in accordance with Bid No. 3947.
11. 175: Authorizing Change Order No. 1 to the contract with Grissom &
Johnson, Inc., in the amount of $46,353.61, for additional rigging and labor
for the Fairmont Boulevard Electrical Substation, Account No. 55-665-6329-
75800-36200, bringing the original contract price to ~502,401.75.
150: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-39: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE OAK CANYON NATURE CENTER PARKING LOT
IMPROV~ENT, FRCM 263' E/O WALNUT CANYON ROAD TO WALNUT CANYON ROAD, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 16-810-7103-1002C. (A. M. Construction, Inc.,
$11,002)
83
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
150: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-40: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE EDISON PARK LIGHTING IMPROVEMENTS, IN THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NOS. 16-816-7103-1612D AND 24-816-7103-16110.
(Bieber Lighting Corporation, $2,750)
152/184: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-41: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING CERTAIN CITY ~PLOYEES TO ACT AS REPRESENTATIVES OF THE
CITY FOR THE ACQUISITION OF FEDERAL SURPLUS PERSONAL PROPERTY FROM THE
CALIFORNIA STATE AGENCY FOR SURPLUS PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER
TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS RELATING THERETO. (Robert G. Berg and
Diane Hughart)
144: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-42: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ENDORSING THE ANALYSES OF RAIL RAPID TRANSIT IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE.
(and ratifying the action of the OCTD's Joint Transit Committee on four rapid
transit alternatives)
158: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-42: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A CERTAIN DEED AND ORDERING ITS RECORDATION. (Beverly A.
Siefkes))
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL M~BERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 83R-39 through 83R-43,
both inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
175: NOTICE OF PACIFIC TELEPHONE RATE INCREASE APPLICATION AND PUBLIC
HEARINGS APPLICATION - 83-01-22 (N.O.I. No. 85): Councilman Bay, referring to
the subject, noted that requested increases by Pacific Telephone to the Public
Utilities Commission (PUC) would raise residential flat rate charges in the
local metropolitan area from $7 to ~15 a month, or an increase of over 100
percent. Other increases ranged from a 3 percent reduction in long distance
rates up to 110 percent increases in verification/interrupt service. He
wanted to state his opposition, especially to the proposed flat rate increase
and felt that the Council should send a letter of opposition to the rate
increases filed in the Application to the PUC.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved that a letter be sent to the PUC opposing the
proposed rate increases. Councilman Roth seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, Council discussion followed wherein Councilman
Pickler stated he would like to have a chance to analyze the situation first,
and then reconsider the matter; Councilman Overholt also wanted additional
information as indicated on page 6 of the notice, that the application and
related exhibits would be furnished upon request.
84
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
MOTION: Councilman Overholt offered a substitute motion as follows: That the
Council go on record opposing blanket and exorbitant increases of telephone
rates as they may impact citizens of Anaheim, particularly those on fixed
incomes and small businesses and that PUC be asked to give full, complete and
exhaustive examination to these extensive rate increases. Councilman Pickler
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
108: ENTERTAI~f{ENT PERMIT - SOC NAU: Application by May Le for the Soc Nau,
507 South Brookhurst Street, to permit a four-piece band seven days a week,
from 12:00 noon to 1:00 a.m.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the application stated that entertainment
would be furnished seven days a week from 12:00 noon to 1:00 a.m. when
normally such requests were from 7:00 or 8:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m. She also
asked that on Entertainment Permits they be provided with a copy of the
Planning Commission map, so they could determine how any residential area
would be impacted by such requests.
May Le, 2144 West La Palma Avenue, applicant, explained that the music to be
played was Vietnamese music, which was very soft. She confirmed for
Councilwoman Kaywood that they were asking for 12:00 noon to 1:00 a.m. at this
time just to cover the complete range of time they might need, because at this
point, they were not certain what time they would open. There would be no
dancing, serving of food or alcohol. Only soft drinks would be available and
live music to listen to on the weekends.
Questions were then posed to the City Attorney by Council Members to clarify
the provisions of the ordinance relative to entertainment permits wherein the
City Attorney stated that if merely background music was involved, no permit
was required.
City Manager William Talley stated that the permit would allow a four-piece
band to play Vietnamese music. If it was going to be expanded to include
non-live music, he would like to understand that.
Councilman Bay stated it was his understanding that the permit was necessary
because the applicant wanted to have live music, four musicians. That was all
the permit covered and had nothin§ to do with canned music, unless
entertainment was tied to lt. The operation was a coffee shop by definition
on the application.
Councilman Pickler suggested that hours be stipulated from 7:00 p.m. to 12:30
a.m.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to approve the application for an Entertainment
Permit submitted by May Le for the Soc Nau, 507 South Brookhurst Street, to
permit a four-piece band seven days a week, but from 5:00 p.m. to 12:30 a.m.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion.
85
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
Before a vote was taken, Councilman Overholt asked for clarification once
again from the City Attorney as to what the ordinance covered. At the
conclusion of the City Attorney's explanation, Councilman Overholt stated that
he did not want to unduly restrict the operation out of an abundance of
caution. He was not going to support the motion, thereby restricting the
activity in what appeared to be a social gathering place for the Vietnamese
community in Anaheim. He would, however, support granting the application
with the understanding if there was any problem, he would be the first to say
it had to be dealt with.
Mayor Roth explained for Miss May Le that if the motion passed, she would have
the right to have a four-piece band play from 5:00 p.m. to 12:30 a.m., instead
of 12:00 noon to 1:00 a.m. as requested, and if they needed to start any
earlier, she would have to submit another application.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. Councilman Overholt voted
"no." MOTION CARRIED.
129/106: HOMEOWNERS GUIDE TO FIRE AND WATERSHED }~NAGEMENT: Councilman
Pickler, referring to staff report dated January 28, 1983, from the Fire
Chief, Bob Simpson, commented that the subject booklet was excellent and
contained vital information for those homeowners in the hill and canyon areas,
since it provided a guide to fire resistive plants and also slope management.
He wanted to know how the booklet was to be distributed.
Fire Chief Bob Simpson stated they were going to set up a method of
distribution through their facilities in the area and in conjunction with the
Homeowners Associations. Further, the present cost for 5,000 booklets was
~1,872 and thus, they could purchase 10,000 booklets for ~3,744, including tax.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to authorize the Fire Department to purchase
a total of 10,000 "Homeowner's Guide to Fire and Watershed Management"
booklets from the Forestry Division of the Los Angeles County Fire Department
in an amount not to exceed ~5,000, with a maximum of ~2,500 of said funds
being appropriated from the Council Contingency Fund. Councilwoman Kaywood
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
173: PROPOSED IMPROVEMENT TO JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT: Joseph E. Irvine, Executive
Director~ Community Airport Council~ requesting the City to encourage the
Board of Supervisors to make general improvements at the John Wayne Airport
(continued from the meeting of February 18, 1983--see minutes that date).
Mayor Roth noted that Mr. Irvine was in the Chambers audience, but before
inviting him to speak, stated that he felt it was extremely important that the
John Wayne Airport be modernized and brought up to date, since it contributed
to the economic well-being of the Orange County area. He reminded the Council
that the destination of 17 percent of the people who landed at the airport was
Anaheim. With due respect to Mrs. Hart, the Mayor of Newport Beach, who in
her letter of February 2, 1983, requested that they postpone consideration of
the resolution proposed by the Community Airport Council supporting expansion,
the Council should go on record approving the improvements specified in the
recommendation.
86
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983~ 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Roth thereupon offered Resolution NO. 83R-44 for adoption,
encouraging the Board of Supervisors to make general improvements at the John
Wayne Airport. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 83R-44: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM RECCMMENDING GENERAL IMPROV~ENTS AT JOHN WAYNE AIRPORT.
Before a vote was taken, Mr. Joseph Irvine, 18105 Skypark South, Irvine,
Executive Director of the Community Airport Council, explained all they were
asking the Board of Supervisors to do was to restate their position made in
the 1981 Master Plan which was subsequently struck down by Judge Sumner
because the supporting EIR was deemed inadequate. They were asking Chambers
of Commerce and City Councils to show some support to give the Board the
backing they needed to make "tough" decisions on the airport.
Mr. Larry Slagle, member of the Airport Authority, stated he was supportive of
the proposed resolution. Their intent was to make the airport more livable.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolution.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL M~BERS:
COUNCIL M~MBERS:
COUNCIL M~BERS:
Kaywood, Pickier, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 83R-44 duly passed and adopted.
170: FINAL MAP TRACT NOS. 9744 AND 9745: Developer, Boulevard Development,
Inc.; tracts are located at the the northeast corner of Canyon Rim Road and
Fairmont Boulevard, and contained 11 and 10 proposed RS-HA-22,000(SC) zoned
lots respectively.
On motion by Councilman Pickler, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the
proposed subdivisions, together with their design and improvement, were found
to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council approved
Final Map Tract Nos. 9744 and 9745, as recommended by the City Engineer in his
memorandums dated January 31, 1983. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NOS. 4390 T~ROUG~ 4392: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance Nos.
4390 through 4392, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4390: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-24(29), ML)
ORDINANCE NO. 4391: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-64(14), ML)
87
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 4392: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHE~4 AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (79-80-3, PR(SC), Riverdale
Park)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M~MBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 4390 through 4392, both inclusive, duly
passed and adopted.
147: ORANGE COUNTY WASTE MANAG~ENT ADVISORY CCMMISSION: Councilman Pickler
reported on his attendance at the second meeting of the subject Commission,
where he was elected Chairman. They were putting together a plan which had
been in process before such a plan was required by the State. On July 1,
1983, the subject of gate fees was again going to be considered.
141: RAMS POSSESSORY INTEREST TAX HEARING: Mayor Roth reported that
yesterday, February 7, 1983, he, Councilman Pickler, City Manager Talley and
City Attorney Hopkins spent a portion of the day in Santa Ana at the Rams
Possessory Interest Tax Hearing, which he felt was a favorable one. Mr.
Talley's testimony before the Hearing Board was to the point and well-received.
106: DISCUSSION OF GENERAL POLICY QUESTIONS ON THE BUDGET: Submitted was an
agenda dated February 4, 1983, from Councilman Bay, subject: Recommended
Budget Policy Discussion for City Council Meeting of February 8, 1983, listing
several items for discussion.
Councilman Overholt stated it was his understanding that Councilman Bay was
going to propose a procedure for consideration where the Council would discuss
budget matters regularly at each Council Meeting for a period of time. He
felt until that was presented, it was premature to discuss the items listed on
the agenda submitted.
City Manager Talley, referring to the booklet submitted by his office to the
Council on Friday (Public Works Department--Capital Improvement
Program--Fiscal Year 1982/83 and Planned Future Projects), explained that it
was prepared in the event the Council wished to discuss background material.
The booklet was a publication prepared last year and which was the current
capital improvement plan for FY 82/83 which had been submitted to the Council
along with the Resource Allocation Plan approximately 10 months ago. Also
provided was a copy of the December Public Works Capital Improvement Report,
since it was staff's understanding that the Council might be getting into a
general discussion as to present status in relation to the plan.
Councilman Bay stated that the information supplied by staff was more than
adequate although it was not requested by him. What he had in mind was to
review the infra-structure and capital improvements that they budgeted for the
88
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983~ 10:00 A.M.
current fiscal year, his objective being to thoroughly exercise the
alternatives to see what they could do about infra-structure, its maintenance
and new projects within the confines and restrictions of the present revenue
chain, rather than raise taxes as the final alternative.
Council discussion followed revolving around the intent of the discussions,
input from some Members on capital improvement projects and possible funding
alternatives, project priorities, the scheduling of future executive
management seminars on the budget, etc. City Manager Talley also answered
questions and gave his input. He emphasized that if the Council wanted to
continue with the current level of general services in the City, they did not
have additional funds in the General Fund to support capital projects.
Councilman Overholt noted that approximately 45 minutes had already been
devoted to the discussion today. He, therefore, suggested that the matter be
continued one week to start at 11:30 a.m. and continue for 30 minutes, and
that the framework for discussion be the agenda submitted by Councilman Bay
dated February 4, 1983; Councilman Bay did not agree that they should set the
discussion for a specific time, but that it should begin immediately following
Council Comments.
MOTION: Councilman Overholt moved to continue further discussion of general
policy questions on the budget to Tuesday, February 15, i983, under Council
Comments with a time limitation of 30 minutes. Councilman Pickler seconded
the motion for the purpose of discussion.
Before a vote was taken, Councilman Pickler stated that he did not believe a
time limit should be set on discussion. If they felt the discussion was
getting out of hand, that would be the appropriate time to consider a limit.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. Councilmen Pickler and Bay
voted "no." MOTION CARRIED.
Before concluding, it was agreed that the Council would be polled by staff as
to the most convenient day for the executive management seminar on the budget,
presently scheduled for Wednesday, May 25, 1983, but which the Mayor
recommended be held on Thursday, May 26, 1983, giving a day's break between
Council Meeting day and another meeting.
RECESS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess for a lunch break. Councilman
Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (12:20 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (1:40 p.m.)
176: PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDOb~ENT NO. 82-4A: In accordance with application
filed by the City of Anaheim, public hearing was held on proposed Abandonment
of a portion of a waterline easement located at 3285 Carpenter Avenue,
pursuant to Resolution No. 83R-11, duly published in the Anaheim Bulletin and
notices thereof posted in accordance with law.
89
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
Report of the City Engineer dated December 20, 1982, and a recommendation by
the Planning Commission, were submitted recommending approval of said
abandonment
Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no
response, he closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman
Pickler, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the City uouncil ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 5, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to
the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 83R-45 for adoption, approving
Abandonment No. 82-4A. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 83R-45: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM VACATING A PORTION OF A WATERLINE EAS~ENT LOCATED AT 3285 CARPENTER
AVENUE. (82-4A)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M~BERS:
COUNCIL M~BERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 83R-45 duly passed and adopted.
155: PUBLIC HEARING--ANAHEIM STADIUM CENTER: To consider Certification of
Environmental Impact Report No. 252, the Orangewood Block Master Plan,
Development Agreement No. 83-01, Declaration of Covenants, Conditions,
Easements and Restrictions, other related operating documents and Conditional
Use Permit No. 2400, to construct a commercial complex in the PR zone with
on-sale alcoholic beverages and outdoor dining facilities on approximately 20
acres of land located on the north side of Orangewood Avenue, approximately
1310 feet east of the centerline of State College Boulevard with the following
Code waivers: (a) maximum number of small car parking spaces, and (b) minimum
number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution PC83-16, having
considered EIR No. 252, finds that it is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and with City and State EIR Guidelines, making
certain findings in connection therewith and adopting a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and further, granted Conditional Use Permit No.
2400, pursuant to Resolution No. PC83-17, subject to the following conditions:
9O
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
1. That ASA (Anaheim Stadium Associates) shall relocate City of Anaheim Well
No. 33 in conjunction with the construction of the Phase III Office Building,
as shown on CUP Sheet No. 20 (Exhibit No. 22). If determined to be necessary,
ASA shall also proportionally participate in providing increased capacity
thereto. Plans for said relocation and possible increased capacity shall be
submitted prior to issuance of a building permit for the Phase III Office
Building. Said plans shall be subject to the review and approval of the
Utilities General Manager.
2. That ASA shall undertake the following water conservation measures:
a. Use automatic sprinkler systems so landscape watering is done during
early morning or evening hours;
b. Implement where feasible, conservation measures as recommended by the
State of California Department of Water Resources and;
c. Implement such other conservation measures as may be required by State
law.
3. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, ASA shall pay to the City
of Anaheim appropriate water assessment fees as determined by the Office of
the Utilities General Manager.
4. That prior to the issuance of a building permit, ASA shall pay to the
Public Utilities Department the prevailing primary main acreage assessment
fees in accordance with Rule No. 15 of the Department's Water Rates, Rules and
Regulations.
5. That ASA shall construct water system improvements deemed necessary to
serve the proposed Anaheim Stadium Center. Service shall include domestic
needs for Phases I - IV, as well as fire flows which will be established by
the City's Fire Marshall.
6. That ASA shall relocate existing utilities lines and easements and provide
new service or increased capacity, as shown on CUP Sheet Nos. 18-21 (Exhibit
Nos. 20-23). Plans for said relocations and/or new service or increased
capacity shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit for each
development phase and are subject to the review and approval of the Utilities
General Manager.
7. That prior to issuance of a building permit for the Phase III Office
Building, ASA shall relocate and underground any affected Southern California
Edison Company overhead transmission lines, as shown on CUP Sheet No. 20
(Exhibit No. 22). ASA shall notify the City, in writing, that this condition
has been satisfied.
8. That, because of construction activities, ASA shall, if determined to be
necessary by the Utilities General Manager, reroute and underground the three
existing 12KV circuits running through the project site. ASA shall also
91
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
underground any additional proposed 12KV circuits which serve the project and
which run through the project site. Plans for said relocation and
undergrounding shall be submitted prior to issuance of a building permit for
any affected development phase.
9. That the Anaheim Public Utilities Department shall maintain adequate
electrical service by installing added 12KV circuits, by increasing substation
capacity and by extending existing 69KV circuits as may be necessary in
conformance with the approved Orangewood Block Master Plan (Exhibit A).
10. That at the time the existing overhead lines along Orangewood Avenue are
undergrounded, ASA shall install street lighting facilities along Orangewood
Avenue, in accordance with specifications on file in the Office of the
Utilities General Manager.
11. That prior to issuance of building permits, ASA shall submit plans
showing that an adequate number of on-site solid waste storage enclosures and
trash compactors with adequate access will be provided. Said plans are
subject to the approval of the Street Maintenance and Sanitation Division and
shall show compliance with plans on file with said Division.
12. That ASA shall be responsible for the following wastewater service
measures:
a. Direct all project wastewater to the Santa Aha River trunk sewer; and
b. Coordinate phasing of the project with the City and with the Orange
County Sanitation District.
13. That ASA shall on a regular basis, sweep and maintain all surface parking
lots used for office tenants and customers to collect pollutants before they
enter the drainage system.
14. That ASA shall, on a regular basis, sweep and maintain all driveway
approaches to parking garages used for office tenants and customers to collect
pollutants before they enter the drainage system.
15. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, ASA shall provide
automatic fire sprinkler systems in all office buildings and parking
structures exceeding 6000 sq. ft. in gross floor area. The fire flow
requirements for this project have been determined to be 5000 GPM. Said
capacity shall be inclusive of the sprinkler system demands.
16. That prior to issuance of any building permits, plans shall be submitted
showing that all buildings including parking garages will be constructed to
conform with all applicable State and City Fire Codes. Said plans, showing
building construction, building separation, accessibility of emergency fire
equipment and location of fire hydrants, are subject to the review and
approval of the Fire Department.
92
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
17. That ASA shall maintain emergency access to Anaheim Stadium before,
during and after stadium events, as shown on the Emergency Access Plan of the
Circulation Management Plan of the Orangewood Block Master Plan (Exhibit A).
18. That a parcel map to record the approved division of the project site,
substantially as shown on SP Sheet No. 2 of the Orangewood Block Master Plan
(Exhibit A), shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and
then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
19o That all grading activities shall be conducted in conformance with
applicable City codes and regulations.
20. That an easement over the project streets and a strip along Orangewood
Avenue to be used for street widening as shown on SP Sheet No. 2 of the
Orangewood Block Master Plan (Exhibit A), shall be offered for dedication for
street and public utility purposes. Said dedication shall be made prior to
the issuance of a building permit for the Phase III Office Building. Said
easements shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim and then
be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
21. That ASA shall install sidewalks in conjunction with street construction
or widening along Orangewood Avenue and the project's internal streets in
conformance with the specifications approved as part of the Orangewood Block
Master Plan (Exhibit A).
22. That prior to commencement of any public street construction, any
proposed special architectural treatment in the public rights-of-way (such as
raised concrete pedestrian cross-walks) shall be subject to the review and
approval of the Planning Director and the City Engineer.
23. That ASA shall construct the project's internal streets to the
specifications and standards approved as part of the Orangewood Block Master
Plan (Exhibit A).
24. That applicable surface runoff pollution and sediment control provisions
contained in SCAG 208 Policies and as required by City codes and regulations
shall be satisfied.
25. That prior to issuance of a building permit, AflA ~hall ~ubm~t written
evidence to the City showing that a Letter of Map Amendment has been obtained
from the Federal Emergency Management Agency. Alternatively ASA shall comply
with the City Flood Hazard Reduction Ordinance (No. 4136).
26. That in accordance with the schedule of improvements set forth in the
Development Agreement No. 83-01 between the City of Anaheim and ASA, the
off-site traffic improvements as shown on CUP Sheet Nos. 27-32 (Exhibit Nos.
29-34) shall be undertaken by ASA or other appropriate entity (e.g., City of
Anaheim, Caltrans). Work on these improvements shall be initiated in
conformance with said schedule. ASA shall participate in the financing of
93
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983~ 10:00 A.M.
such improvements (including land acquisition) to the extent that this project
(Anaheim Stadium Center) will use the traffic capacity created by said
improvements. Financing will be done in a manner determined by the City
(i.e., assessment district, benefit district, etc.).
27. That major tenants in the project (Anaheim Stadium Center) shall be
required to implement a Transportation System Management ("TSM") program to
reduce the overall number of vehicles driven to the site.
28. That prior to commencement of Phase III or sooner if determined to be
necessary by the Orange County Transit District, ASA and the City Traffic
Engineer, a turnout for a bus stop shall be provided by ASA at the northwest
corner of the intersection of Orangewood Avenue and the office access road.
29. That prior to commencement of the activity herein approved (issuance of
the first building permit), the entry road to Anaheim Stadium from Orangewood
Avenue shall be relocated, the "island buffer" created by this relocation
shall be landscaped, the existing eight (8) entry gates shall be relocated and
five (5) new entry gates shall be provided.
30. That prior to issuance of a building permit for each office building and
office parking garage, satisfactory evidence regarding seismic and peak load
considerations shall be submitted in conjunction with structural plans for
evaluation and approval by the Building Division.
31. That prior to issuance of any building permit, detailed soils and geology
reports shall be submitted by ASA for review and approval by the Building
Division.
32. That energy conservation measures meeting or exceeding the requirements
of Title 24 of the California Administrative Code shall be incorporated by ASA
in the project (Anaheim Stadium Center).
33. That during all construction periods ASA shall be responsible for:
a. Employing watering techniques as required by the City Building Code;
b. Covering trucks filled with soils when said trucks exceed 20 m.p.h, or
l~av~ th~ pr0jaet git~: and
c. Mandating a 20 m.p.h, speed limit on unpaved surfaces.
34. That during all construction periods the following noise reduction
measures shall be undertaken by ASA:
a. To the extent feasible, limit noise producing activities to daytime
hours between 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., as required by the Anaheim Municipal
Code.
94
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8~ 1983~ 10:00 A.M.
b. Muffle or shield construction equipment acoustically where feasible;
and
c. Use ambient noise mitigating barriers, berms, landscaping and
structural design techniques when appropriate.
35. That prior to issuance of any building permit, ASA shall submit evidence
showing that existing affected underground telephone conduit will be rerouted
as necessary. Any joint trenching by the Telephone Company and ASA shall be
co-ordinated with the Public Utilities Department and other affected utility
companies.
36. That project architects and engineers shall consult with the Commercial
Energy Management Group of the Southern California Gas Company to review
recent developments in energy saving systems which can be utilized in the
project approved h~rein.
37. That ASA shall undertake the following public safety measures:
a. That prior to issuance of a building permit for each development
phase, ASA shall review security and circulation features with the Police
Department ; and
b. That ASA shall provide adequate lighting along interior streets,
parking areas and walkways to the satisfaction of the Police Department.
38. That ASA shall implement appropriate salvage measures under the City's
direction if a potentially significant cultural/scientific resource deposit is
encountered during grading.
39° That prior to commencement of the activity approved herein (issuance of
the first building permit), covenants, conditions, easements and restrictions
("CC&R's") for the project shall be submitted to the City Attorney for review
and approval. ASA shall then file and record said documents, as approved, in
the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
40. That the project framework consisting of streets, plaza, landscaping,
et¢.~ shall be constructed substantially as shown on CUP Sheet No. 5 (Exhibit
~).
41. That a minimum of 2.78 parking spaces shall be provided for every
one-thousand (1000) square feet of gross floor area in the office buildings
and in the commercial space located in the parking garages. No more than
fifty percent (50%) of the parking spaces shall be for small cars.
42. That prior to issuance of a building permit for the Phase III Office
Building, the Ground Lease shall be amended to make reservation of land on the
future State College Block to remedy any parking deficiencies created on the
Orangewood Block by the parking waivers as granted herein. Said reservation
need not exceed the difference between the number of parking spaces currently
required by Code and the number for which the parking waivers are granted.
95
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
43. That prior to issuance of a building permit for each office building and
office parking garage, the proposed building design for each such building and
garage including the percentage of small car parking spaces shall be submitted
to the Planning Department for review and approval by the Planning
Commission. Said submittal shall also show that adequate loading dock access
and space will be provided as required by City code. Furthermore, Development
Agreement No. 83-01 shall be amended to include Commission approval of the
afore-mentioned plans prior to issuance of any building permit.
44. That the landscaping plan shall be implemented substantially as shown on
CUP Sheet No. 17 (Exhibit No. 19).
45. That any amendment to the Orangewood Block Master Plan (Exhibit A) in
compliance with the Amendments Procedure contained therein shall-also be
deemed an amendment to this Conditional Use Permit.
46. That ASA shall pay the appropriate traffic signal assessment fees in
accordance with City Council Ordinance No. 3896 or construct off-site traffic
improvements as shown on CUP Sheet Nos. 27-32 (Exhibit Nos. 29-34), whichever
is greater. Payment of said fees or the construction shall take place as
indicated by the phasing in the Block Master Plan (Exhibit A).
47. That the design for the Phase I parking structure shall include
pedestrian ramps and/or escalators, as approved by the City Traffic Engineer.
48. That the proposed parking structure for the Phase I Office/Commercial
building shall be constructed prior to or concurrently with said building.
Approval of Development Agreement No. 83-01 Orangewood Block Master Plan
Declaration of Covenants, Conditions, Easements and Restrictions and other
related documents were also recommended by the Planning Commission.
Mr. Joel Fick, Assistant Planning Director--Planning, stated that the Anaheim
Stadium Center was a project that staff and Cabot, Cabot and Forbes had been
working on for several years. It was undoubtedly the project most
comprehensively addressed and planned in its pre-planning stages of perhaps
any project staff had the opportunity to work on in the City of Anaheim.
Representatives from Cabot, Cabot and Forbes (CC&F) were present today to give
a slide presentation summarizing the project detail that had been presented in
the staff report (see Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated
January 24, 1983) and the numerous documents that comprised the public record
for the project. (The documentation included the following, bound in
booklets, which were submitted by Anaheim Stadium Ass0¢iates~ Inc., and Cabot,
Cabot & Forbes/RAMCO Partnership on the Orangewood site master
plan--Developement Plan, Subdivision Plan, Improvement Plan, Traffic Impact
Summary, Amendments Procedure; Circulation Management Plan; Application for
Conditional Use Permit; Draft EIR 252, City of Anaheim, November 1982;
Comments and Responses to Draft EIR 252, January 1983; Parcel Map; Declaration
of Covenants, Conditions, Easements and Restrictions; Development Agreement.)
96
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
In concluding, Mr. Fick stated that the Planning Commission recommended
approval of the project. They did modify four of the conditions and each of
those would be addressed in the presentation today by Cabot, Cabot and Forbes,
as they had done some initial studies and findings with respect to those
conditions. At the request of the Mayor, Mr. Ftck stated the four conditions
were as follows:
(1) That the proposed parking structure for the Phase I Office Commercial
Complex shall be constructed prior to or conjunctively with construction of
the Phase I building.
(2) That the widening of Orangewood Avenue between the Anaheim Stadium ingress
and egress roads shall be completed at the same time as the other improvements
on Orangewood Avenue during Phase I rather than Phase III as originally
proposed.
(3) That the parking structure shall be designed to include pedestrian ramps
and/or escalators.
(4) That final specific plans for the proposed building and parking garage,
including the percentage of small car parking spaces and pedestrian ramps
and/or escalators shall be submitted to the Planning Department prior to
issuance of building permits for review and approval by the Planning
Commission.
Mayor Roth then asked to hear from the applicant or applicant's agent.
Mr. James Kenyon, Executive Vice President, Cabot, Cabot and Forbes, 1755
Warwick, San Marino, first stated that he had been involved in the subject
project since the fall of 1977. He then gave an historic overview of the
events that had taken place since that time, leading to their presentation
before the Council today. Theirs was a two-fold objective in partnership with
Anaheim Stadium Associates, Inc., the first being to enclose Anaheim Stadium,
expanding its capacity from 43,000 to approximately 70,000 seats, which had
already been accomplished, and the second being the development of the
peripheral Stadium land. The subject project was a part of that development
plan and they were present today to present the Master Plan for the Orangewood
Block. Mr, Kenyon supplemented his presentation with slides.
Mr. John Wasson, 911 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, Vice President of Cabot,
Cabot and Forbes and Project Manager for the Anaheim Stadium Project,
explained that from his point of view, the project design was the most
intensive and deliberately studied project he had ever been involved in, which
was true for most of the consultants as well. His slide presentation would be
covering five different elements: Preparation of the Master Plan, The Site
Plan, Phase I Building, Parking and Traffic. The project was split in two
segments, the Orangewood Block, the subject of the meeting today, and the
State College Block. They would be back before the Council prior to the end
of 1993 with a Master Plan Proposal for the State College Block. Mr. Wasson
then narrated a slide presentation covering the aforementioned five elements.
97
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
He emphasized that the plan before the Council today resulted from thousands
of hours of moving around the different constraints involved. There were
literally hundreds of constraints and the subject plan was the best
configuration of all possible solutions to the problem. The slides also
depicted comparable projects with the same land areas superimposed over the
Anaheim Stadium Center project. Mr. Wasson's presentation concluded with a
slide showing the four-phase plan in the sequence in which each phase was
going to occur, expected to take approximately nine to ten years, during which
the four office buildings would be constructed and leased.
Mr. Marls Peika, Partner, Skidmore Owens and Merrill, then narrated a slide
presentation showing the design objectives for the Orangewood Block Master
Plan, the circulation pattern, open space, site plan for Phase I building,
etc.; Mr. Hans Korbe, President of DKS Associates, 1419 Broadway, Oakland,
spoke on the traffic plan, on site circulation system, project entry routes,
how the project would load and unload during a normal work day or combined
with various events at the Stadium, pedestrian circulation, mitigation
measures, etc. His presentation was supplemented by slides illustrating the
topics of his presentation.
Mr. Wasson then made a further presentation summarizing the parking situation
on the different pieces of land surrounding the Stadium. He also reported on
the current parking inventory and the impact the development would have from
Phase I through Phase IV. They had worked very closely with City Traffic
Engineer Paul Singer in studying the traffic impact of the development in the
area.
Before concluding, Mr. Wasson briefed their letter dated February 8, 1983,
submitted to the Council prior to the meeting, specifically outlining the four
conditions previously stated by Mr. Fick, and which were imposed upon them by
the Planning Commission at the January 24, 1983 meeting (see Planning
Commission minutes that date). The letter was made a part of the record.
They were asking for a modification to the first condition (a) as outlined in
their letter inasmuch as they felt it could influence the possible success of
the overall project; that condition (b) be removed; that relative to condition
(c)) Anaheim Stadium Associates should be given the opportunity to develop a
vertical transportation system, and that on condition (d), that modified
conditions (a)~ (b) and (c) as outlined on Page 3 of their letter be adopted
instead.
After Mr. Wasson's presentation, Mayor Roth asked what assurances the Council
had that Phase II of the project would be built in a reasonable time.
Mr. Wasson answered that one assurance was the development agreement giving
them certain rights and the City certain rights and there was a time element
in that agreement. Without a development agreement for a long-term project,
they could become very vulnerable to zoning manipulations. He wanted to make
it clear also that the ground lease and development agreement were two
separate documents.
98
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8~ 1983, 10:00 A.M.
Questions were then posed to Mr. Wasson by the Council Members relating to
unloading of the parking structure, the possible use of people ramps, the
alternative if relief were not granted relative to their request to develop
and subsequently submit a vertical transportation system, etc. Traffic
Engineer Paul Singer also provided additional information regarding parking
and traffic.
City Manager Talley pointed out that during most of the Rams games, the
parking lot around the Stadium was usually full, whereas that occurred only a
few times for Angels games. Relative to Phase I of the subject development,
if every parking stall was displaced and no stalls added, there would be
14,300 + stalls, or well over 2,000 more than needed for any Angels game if
none of those stalls were replaced. The City legally could take Phase I, or
actually all four phases, never replace any of the stalls, and still meet all
of their Angels' commitments and that was by the count. That was not
recognizing the ever-increasing number of mid- and compact-size cars, which
would create somewhere between 1,500 and 2,000 additional stalls.
Traffic Engineer Singer then clarified that relative to traffic, they measured
the capacity of the streets by the level of service, and the studies that were
conducted indicated that level of service would approach capacity only after
Phase III; Mr. Wasson also emphasized that Anaheim Stadium Associates was
going to be spending between ~4 million and 36 million on traffic mitigation
measures off-site.
The Mayor then asked if anyone wished to speak, either in favor or in
opposition.
Mr. A. E. "Red" Patterson, Assistant to the Chairman of the Board, California
Angels, referred to the agreement reached in 1964 between the Angels and the
City, which included lease of the Stadium and the parking area, calling for
space for not less than 12,000 cars. When the City came to an agreement with
Cabot, Cabot and Forbes in 1978 or 1979, moving the Rams to Anaheim, the
Angels were not consulted relative to land that would be taken away from
them. In 1980, the City suggested that they sit down and clarify the contract
signed in 1964 for operational reasons and long negotiations followed. An
agreement was finally signed in July of 1981. Mr. Patterson read from Page 25
of that agreement (ITem B--Location and Design), his main thrust bein§ the
portion which read as follows: "...The parties hereto agree that prior to the
issuance of any building permit, or permits for construction on any portion of
said existing parking facilities, City and Angels shall in good faith attempt
to agree upon plans and specifications for such modified parking facilities.
In the event said parties are unable to agree upon said modifications within a
reasonable period of time, then the rights and obligations of the parties
hereto, if any, with respect to approval of the design and location of said
parking facilities, shall be the same as set forth in said 1964 agreement, and
nothing contained in this agreement shall constitute a modification or waiver
by the City or Angels of any rights they may otherwise have under said 1964
agreement with respect to said parking facilities."
99
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Patterson stated that they had been advised by legal counsel that the 1964
lease included not less than 12,000 parking spaces on the original
specifications. Those were the specifications that were brought together by
Noble W. Hersberg and those were the 20 acres being wiped out in the proposed
agreement. They were now asking for a postponement of action on the matter
before the Council today and unless it was given, the Angels would be forced
to go to legal counsel and perhaps legal action.
City Manager Talley then explained that the City, in trying to modernize the
1964-65 agreement with the Angels, spent 19 months working with Mr. Patterson,
Mr. Bavasi and other members of the Angels. One of the areas they could never
agree on was that the City was obligated to provide 12,000 stalls and that the
Angels themselves did not have the rights or ownership of specific pieces of
property. They could not agree on language in the agreement during those 19
months so they, therefore, agreed that whatever rights either party had in the
1964 agreement were carried over. On September 21, 1982, the City made a full
presentation to Mr. Bavasi and during that presentation the City assumed it
had an agreement to proceed. Subsequently, because Mr. Patterson expressed
concerns at the Planning Commission hearing on January 24, 1983, another
meeting was held with both Messrs. Patterson and Bavasi. They had not seen
the plans and the City subsequently provided them with those plans. Later,
Mr. Bavasi also mentioned that he had legal concerns. The City was willing
and able to discuss those if they were given the name of the Angels' legal
advisors. If there was a difference of legal opinion, he encouraged the
Angels to provide the City with a name or firm so that City Attorney Hopkins
could meet with them and bring back a reconciliation to the Council.
City Attorney William Hopkins stated he was aware that there were extensive
meetings with the Angels. He suggested that any discussion of a legal nature
be carried on in Closed Session due to the comments made about possible
litigation.
Councilman 0verholt, speaking to Mr. Patterson, stated he felt his concern was
not so much for the Orangewood development, but the impact of the State
College development in the future.
Mr. Patterson answered that it was both developments, but his chief concern
was for their fans. They were not going to have the spaces they needed when
they were taken away by the Orangewood development. Their fans would have to
walk that much farther and that was one of the issues they wanted to discuss
with the City.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
Questions were then posed to Mr. Wasson by the Council. Staff members, Annika
Santalahti, Assistant Planning Director--Zoning, Jim Armstrong, Assistant to
the City Manager, and Tom Liegler, Stadium/Convention Center/Golf General
Manager, also answered questions posed for the purpose of clarification.
100
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
Mayor Roth stated he was sensitive particularly to the California Angels and
Mr. Patterson and he had faith that any problems could be worked out°
Relative to the proposed project, the final plan was not only well engineered,
but also very well thought out, as evidenced by all the documentation,
presentations and the slides. He encouraged his colleagues to follow the
recommendations of approval while at the same time considering favorably the
requests of Cabot, Cabot and Forbes as set forth in their February 8, 1983
letter.
MOTION--RECESS: Mayor Roth proceeded to offer the proposed resolutions for
adoption; Councilman Bay interjected and moved that they recess to a Closed
Session in view of the concerns raised by Mr. Patterson. Councilman Pickler
seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, City Attorney Hopkins recommended that a Closed
Session be held before any action was taken by the Council.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:45 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (4:00 p.m.)
Mayor Roth then restated that the City, its elected officials, the City
Manager, City Attorney and staff would continue to work with the California
Angels to solve the problems Mr. Patterson stated today. They valued their
number one tenant, the California Angels, and would continue to try to
mitigate any problem areas.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 83R-46 for adoption, certifying
Environmental Impact Report No. 252, after its having been reviewed by the
City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission to be in compliance
with City and State Guidelines, and the State of California Environmental
Quality Act, making certain findings in connection therewith, and adopting a
Statement of Overriding Considerations. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 83R-46: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANA/{EIM (A) CERTIFYING FINAL ENVIROhl~ENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 252, (B) MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH, AND (C) ADOPTING A STATEMENT OF
OVERRIDING CONSIDERATIONS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
AB SENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 83R-46 duly passed and adopted.
101
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 8, 1983, 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 83R-47 for adoption, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 2400 in accordance with City Planning Commission
Conditions, but deleting the phasing in of the proposed parking structure on
Phase I, until Phase II; postponing the widening of Orangewood until Phase III
or upon a recommendation by the Traffic Engineer that traffic indicates
widening is needed; that relative to the parking structure and the requirement
that it shall be designed to include pedestrian ramps and/or escalators be
worked out at a later date to a satisfactory solution due to the fact that the
parking structure will come on line after completion of Phase I. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 83R-47: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2400 WITH A WAIVER OF PARKING
SPACES REQUIREMENTS IN CONJUNCTION THEREWITH.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL Mt~IBERS:
COUNCIL MMMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 83R-47 duly passed and adopted.
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to approve the Orangewood Block Master Plan.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 4393: Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance No. 4393 for first
reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4393: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(i) APPROVING A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND
ANAHE]~i STADIUM ASSOCIATES, (ii) FINDING THAT THE PROVISIONS OF SAID
DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT ARE CONSISTENT WITH THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, AND (iii) AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY. (83-01)
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to approve the Declaration of Covenants,
Conditions, Easements and Restrictions and other related documents.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 4394: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4394 for first
reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4394: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(A) APPROVING AN AMENDMENT NO. 4 TO THE FACILITY LEASE DATED AUGUST 31, 1978
BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND CITY OF ANAHEIM (CALIFORNIA) STADIUM, INC. ( A
PUBLIC LEASEBACK CORPORATION), (B) APPROVING AN AMENDMENT NO. 3 TO THE SITE
LEASE DATED AUGUST 31, 1978 BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND CITY OF ANAHEIM
(CALIFORNIA) STADI[I~, INC. (A PUBLIC LEASEBACK CORPORATION), AND (C)
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AND DELIVER SAID AMENEMENTS.
102
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Februar~ 8~ 1983~ 10:00 A.M.
Before concluding, Mayor Roth commended City Manager Talley, Tom Liegler,
James Armstrong, City Attorney Hopkins, Jack White, Assistant City Attorney,
and the Planning staff who worked together to bring the project before the
Council today. It was a landmark decision and the outcome of teamwork between
City staff and the staff of Cabot, Cabot and Forbes and their consultants, and
Anaheim Stadium Associates, Inc.
RECESS - REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: The City Attorney requested a Closed
Session to discuss litigation, potential litigation and a personnel matter.
Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session. Councilwoman Kaywood
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:05 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (4:55 p.m.)
ADJOUR/~{ENT: Councilman Roth moved to adjourn. Councilman Bay seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:55 p.m.)
-- LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK
103