Loading...
1983/05/31City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRE SENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth COUNCIL MEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts FINANCE DIRECTOR: George P. Ferrone INTERGOVERNMENTAL RELATIONS OFFICER: Cindy Cave ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ZONING: Annika Santalahti TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Paul Singer Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. INVOCATION: The Reverend Rick Gastil, Hotline Help Center, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman E. Llewellyn Overholt, Jr., led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Roth and authorized by the City Council: Danny Clark Week, June 5-11, 1983. Parks and Recreation Month in Anaheim, June 1983. The first proclamation was accepted by Danny Clark; the Parks and Recreation Month proclamation was accepted by A1 Peraza, Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission. 119: RESOLUTIONS OF COMMENDATION: Resolutions of Commendation were unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to Mike Putnam, Harry Scott and Kevin Brown for their quick actions in saving the life of Robert Smith of Huntington Beach at the Santa Ana River Lakes in Anaheim on May 12, 1983. MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held March 26, 1983, and the adjourned regular meeting h~ld March 27, 1983, with an addition to Page 300 of the April 26 minutes as follows: "Councilwoman Kaywood asked the City Attorney whether large doners of campaign contributions over $5,000 statewide were required to file a Campaign Disclosure Statement each year. Attorney Hopkins responded, not unless they were committees, no individuals; otherwise just recipients are required to file Campaign Disclosure Statements." Before any action was taken, Councilman Overholt asked if, in fact, the addition was a part of the tape of the meeting of April 26, 1983; City Clerk Linda Roberts answered, yes, to her belief, but she did not include it in the minutes since it did not pertain to fireworks, which was the subject under discussion. The suggested addition to the minutes was not a verbatim. 431 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. Mayor Roth questioned the reason for the change and he was going to instead move for denial. Councilman Overholt then moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held April 26, 1983, as presented, without the proposed addition, but without prejudice to Councilwoman Kaywood to move to amend those minutes on June 7, 1983, and also to approve the minutes of the adjourned regular meeting held April 27, 1983. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. Council Members Kaywood and Roth voted "No" on the minutes of April 26, 1983. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Overholt then stated if there was a verbatim requested and the verbatim supported Councilwoman Kaywood's recommended amendment, he would second her motion next week. He then clarified for Councilwoman Kaywood that he was not requesting a verbatim. Councilwoman Kaywood thereupon requested a verbatim of that portion of the minutes; City Clerk Roberts clarified the verbatim would include the particular portion in which the statement was made, and not the whole issue. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Bay moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda, after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of ~1,020,599.41, in accordance with the 1982-83 Budget, were approved. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the following items were approved in accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution Nos. 83R-212 through 83R-216, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. 1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as recommended: A. The following claims were rejected and referred to Risk Management: 1. Claim submitted by Shafik Haron and Shafik Haron as Guardian Ad Litem for minor children Sausan and Tambi Haron for wrongful death of Hana Haron purportedly sustained due to construction, design and/or maintenance of the intersection of Euclid Street and Sallie Lane, on or about January 21, 1983. 2. Claim submitted by Bonnie Dunscombe for personal property damages to car tire purportedly sustained due to condition of the street on Lakeview just before the La Palma intersection, on or about March 26, 1983. 432 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. 3. Claim submitted by Dr. Steven J. Moore for personal property damages to left rear tire of automobile purportedly sustained due to exiting of Convention Center, northeast corner near Kat.ella Avenue, on or about April 10, 1983. 4. Claim submitted by Pacific National Insurance Company, Bleckert's Diesel Repair, insured, for property damages purportedly sustained due to failure of traffic signal at State College Boulevard and La Palma Avenue, on or about April 18, 1983. 5. Claim submitted by Edward Glen Stubbs for personal property damages to car purportedly sustained due to an accident caused by City-owned property at Canyon Rim and Via Arboles, on or about April 22, 1983. B. Applications for Leave to Present Late Claims rejected: 6. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Carl Clippinger for injuries purportedly sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident in the men's restroom in the vicinity of Anaheim Lake, on or about February 23, 1982. 7. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Frances Walker for personal property damages at 1230 South Euclid, Apartment llB, purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 8. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Gladys Walker for personal property damages at 1613 West Ball Road, purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 9. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Virginia Cook for personal property damages at 1230 South Euclid, Apartment 20D, purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 10. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Catherine Shanley for personal property damages purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 11. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Nancy Joan Hammett and Lisa Dawn Smith for personal property damages at 1612 Juno Avenue, Apartment 5, purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 12. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Harvey and Lorene Demanouske for personal property damages at 1640 West Ball Road, Apartment 209, purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 433 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. 2. The following correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. 156: Police Department--Monthly Report for April 1983. b. 105: Park and Recreation Commission--Minutes of February 23, 1983. c. 105: Public Library Board--Minutes of April 20, 1983. d. 140: Public Library--Monthly Statistical Summary for April 1983. e. 105: Public Utilities Board--Minutes of May 5, 1983. (unapproved) 3. 108: The following applications were approved in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police: a. Pool Room Application, Thomas A. Hubert, Wizards Arcade, 962 South Euclid Street, to permit 6 pool tables. b. Public Dance Permit, Kenney P. Hrabik, Arrow Productions, to hold a dance at the Anaheim Convention Center on June 24, 1983, from 8:00 p.m. to 12:30 a.m. 4. 106: Approving the i983/84 Resource Allocation Plan Adoption Schedule, and setting June 14, 1983, 1:30 p.m. as the date and time to hold a public hearing. 5. 150/li9/106: Accepting a donation from the Disneyland Community Services Award Program in the amount of $2,000 for the Anaheim Volunteer Program, and appropriating the funds into Program 277, Teens, Co-Recreation and Volunteer Services. 6. 153: Receiving and filing the Affirmative Action Year End Reports for 1982. 7. 123/106: Authorizing a letter agreement with California 457 Benefits, Limited, in the amount of $5,000 to review, analyze and make recommendations on the Deferred Compensation Plans presented by Glendale Federal Savings and Loan, ICMA and the City Credit Union, and further authorizing said amount be taken from the Council Contingency Fund. 8. 139: Opposing SB 637 (McCorquodale), legislation placing local government under the jurisdiction of the State Public Employment Relations Board in the settlement of unfair labor practice charges and communicating said opposition to Senators Seymour and Royce. 9. 139: Opposing AB 1666 (Cortez) legislation establishing a California Uniform Construction Cost Accounting Commission to develop procedures for cost accounting and bidding of public works and maintenance projects. 10. 139: Opposing SB 1050 (Montoya) legislation placing municipal utilities under the jurisdiction of the Public Utilities Commission in the setting and regulation of pole attachment fees. 434 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. 11. 123: Authorizing an agreement with Fairmont Limited, in conjunction with Tentative Parcel Map No. 83-228, to defer payment for street improvements by the developer on Fairmont Boulevard, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, to coincide with other improvements. 12. 158: Authorizing payment of ~91,771 to Adolph Philip Miller for modifications to the building and parking lot lighting and signing at 325 and 327 South Anaheim Boulevard, as required by the Anaheim Boulevard Street Widening Project, Account No. 13-792-7101-E2580. (R/W 2800-2) 13. 160: Accepting the low bid of Blankenship Police Supply in the amount of ~14,106.80 for 53 Nylon Windbreakers with zip out Body Armor Ballistic pack, in accordance with Bid No. 3970. 175: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-212: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE YORBA SUBSTATION EQUIPMENT AND STRUCTURE FOUNDATIONS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 55-659-6329-8603A-36200. (Markel Cement Contracting, Inc., $9,300) 164: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-213: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE HARBOR BOULEVARD SEWER REPAIR, SOUTH OF KATELLA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 11-790-6325-E0480. (Nick Didovic Construction Company, contractor) .169: P~SOLUTION NO. 83R-214: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, ANDTHE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: PATT STREET AREA STREET, WATER AND PARK IMPROVEMENTS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NOS. 25-793-6325-E3490; 25-806-7103-06060; AND 25-806-7103-06160, FY 1981-82. (R. J. Noble Company, contractor) 169: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-215: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: KATELLA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, HASTER STREET TO WALNUT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 24-793-6325-E3710. (All American Asphalt Company, contractor) 167: RESOLUTION NO. 83R-216: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT GLENVIEW AVENUE AT KELLOGG DRIVE AND CHANTILLY STREET AND LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NOS. 01-794-6325-E4240 AND 01-794-6325-E4250. (Baxter-Griffin Company, $69,945) 435 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None None MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 83R-212 through 83R-216, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 139: ASSEMBLY CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT NO. 38 (NAYLOR): Request of staff to oppose Assembly Constitutional Amendment No. 38 (Naylor), a measure which would require all taxes of a local government to be approved by two-thirds of the voters, was submitted. Mayor Roth stated he was not in opposition to Naylor's or Senator Seymour's bill. He felt they did nothing more than reinforce Proposition 13 and what was overwhelmingly passed by the citizens. He could not support opposition of the Amendment. Councilman Bay stated he felt the same way and he was not ready to go on record as opposing Amendment No. 38 at this time. Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that Proposition 13 did not require a two-third's vote, but a majority vote. What did get a two-thirds vote was the $10 million Anaheim Storm Drain Bond Issue, but the Council refused to honor that. There was a great deal of confusion and she would question anybody who could explain the exact intent of Proposition 13. The issue ih this case was local control and nothing more. Councilwoman Kaywood moved to continue the item to June 7, 1983, since she wanted the City Attorney's opinion on whether the proposed amendment was constitutional. Before any action was taken, Councilman Pickler stated that he did not vote for Proposition 13 and he still did not think it had helped where it should. If they went to a two-thirds vote, he felt it would be unfair to the people. He instead favored a simple majority. If they kept adding a two-thirds vote to everything, it was going to make it difficult to function. He would sign anything they had to oppose the Amendment. Councilman Pickler thereupon seconded the motion to continue any action for one week. Before a vote was taken, Councilman Overholt, referring to memorandum dated May 31, 1983, signed by the Director of Finance and the Intergovernmental Relations Officer, asked the Finance Director why there was a recommendation to oppose. Mr. George Ferrone, Finance Director, stated the major concern came out of his position on the League Board of Directors. The thrust was not only to have the two-thirds vote on the taxes they were normally encountering, but also on 436 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. such things as license fees and any kind of an imposition that they might want to raise, such as the room tax issue, which would be broached today. The essence of the amendment was talking about taking away the ability of local government to raise a fee of any kind. In answer to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Ferrone clarified that he sat on the League Board of Directors representing the Finance Directors of the State. They were recommending opposition to the amendment because of the issue she raised of interference in local control. Cindy Cave, Intergovernmental Relations Officer, explained that Proposition 13 did require a two-thirds voter approval for a tax increase; however, subsequently the courts had reviewed cases that dealt with taxes that would support general purposes of local government. She cited some of those cases. What the constitutional amendments would do would be to reverse the court decisions and say that any kind of tax increase, whether for special purposes or general purposes, would have to be subject to a two-thirds voter approval. The concern was that even actions such as dealing with business licenses would be subject to two-thirds voter approval. The Council was aware that if they wanted to take an issue, such as enacting a utilities tax to the voters, they could do so under the Charter City provisions, but the amendment would require them to go to the voters. They were recommending opposition on the basis of local control of local revenues. Councilman Overholt stated he felt it was foolishness for the Council to take a public position on an issue so important to the State without having full and complete information. He would like another week to see if they could come up with more details to see exactly what Proposition 13 did intend and how the Naylor and Seymour amendments would implement that intention, if they did so. Mayor Roth requested that a copy of Seymour's amendment, ACA 26, be provided and also a call placed to his office to ask whether he was going to propose another amendment which would be the complete opposite as reported by Councilwoman Kaywood (Councilwoman Kaywood interjected and confirmed that Senator Seymour had made that statement at the League of Cities meeting which they all heard). They should also ask for a position by the Chamber of Commerce; Councilman Pickler felt they should receive input from both sides of the picture which would include the League of Cities. Councilman Bay did not believe they were going to find anyone at this time who could tell them what Proposition 13 said, especially when numerous courts throughout the State were busily interpreting it. A vote was then taken on the motion for continuance to June 7, 1983. MOTION CARRIED. 139: OPPOSITION TO SB 142 (ELLIS) REQUIRING CASH COMPENSATION BY CITIES TO OWNERS FOR REMOVAL OF NONCONFORMING SIGNS: Cindy Cave, Intergovernmental Relations Officer, clarified for Mayor Roth that the bill would require cash compensation if the City required the business person to take a sign down. She then deferred to the Assistant Director for Zoning. 437 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. Annika Santalahti, Assistant Director for Zoning, briefed the Council on the effects of the proposed bill. She stated further that is was her understanding even if an amortization period were given, cash compensation would be due. The only time they would begin to be more specific was when the owner wanted to modify or reconstruct a nonconforming sign that needed work and in that case, they were required to modify to current Code regulations. It was usually a negotiated subject between the sign owner and the City. If they made a serious change to their sign ordinance that would introduce an amortization period, they would be notifying every interested person, the Chamber of Commerce, and any sign companies for them to come in and give information that if it turned out that signs needed to be amortized over 10 periods, what she would expect is that the ordinance would reflect a reasonable amortization period and not one that was unduly short. Councilman Bay stated this was specifically a case of the State attempting to take over local control; Councilwoman Kaywood stated it was just another example where the State was changing local laws and mandating actions that would cost cities a great deal of money. MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to oppose SB 142 (Ellis) legislation invalidating local sign ordinances by requiring mandatory cash compensation by the cities to owners for removal of any nonconforming on-premise business signs, as recommended in joint memorandum dated May 24, 1983, from the Planning Director and Intergovernmental Relations Officer. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 106/167: TRAFFIC SIGNAL MODIFICATION - INTERSECTION OF SUNKIST STREET AND BALL ROAD: Councilman Pickler questioned why they needed to spend $2,500 to engage Weston Pringle and Associates to design the subject signal modifications as recommended in memorandum dated May 25, 1983, from the City Engineer. He felt they should be able to utilize the same design used on other similar intersections in the City. Traffic Engineer Paul Singer explained that every traffic signal was an individual installation and, further, they needed the signal plan preparation with specific drawings and specifications in order to bid the job. MOTION: Councilman Bay moved authorize an expenditure of 550,000 for traffic signal modifications at the intersection of Sunkist Street and Ball Road; waiver of Council Policy 401 waiving bidding procedures; and authorizing expenditure of $2,500 to engage the firm of Weston Pringle and Associates for design of the signal modifications, as recommended in memorandum dated May 25, 1983, from the City Engineer. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 150/174: FUNDING PROPOSAL - ORANGE COUNTY REVENUE SHARING FUNDS: Councilman Pickler moved to authorize the Parks, Recreation and Community Services Department to submit a funding proposal to the County of Orange in the amount of 58,775 to obtain Revenue Sharing Funds to continue services of the Senior Citizen Day Care Center during Federal Fiscal Year 1983-84, as recommended in memorandum dated May 23, 1983, from Christopher Jarvi, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 438 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. 105: APPOINTMENT TO THE GOLF COURSE ADVISORY COMMISSION: Councilwoman Kaywood nominated Mr. Mike Jacobs to fill a vacancy on the Golf Course Advisory Commission; Councilman Roth nominated Mr. Jerry LeMar. Councilman Roth moved to close nominations. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. A roll call vote was then taken in the order in which the nominations were made. Mike Jacobs: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None Jerry LeMar: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None None Mr. LeMar was thereupon appointed to the Golf Course Advisory Commission to fill the vacancy created by the death of Mr. Tom Hoag. Councilman Overholt, noting the many qualified individuals who had applied, felt it was a very positive sign and he hoped that those people would apply again should a vacancy arise. Mayor Roth asked that a letter be sent to all of the applicants thanking them for their interest, encouraging them to reapply as openings occurred on the Commission. City Clerk Roberts also confirmed that the applications would remain on file. 108: ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICATION - HUMDINGER #4: (Continued from the meetings of May 17 and May 24, 1983--see minutes those dates.) Mayor R0th asked if the signing violations as noted in memorandum dated May 25, 1983, from the Zoning Division, had been brought to the attention of the applicant; Miss Santalahti answered that the letter was going to be sent this week. Mayor Roth stated that any approval would be subject to compliance with the Sign Ordinance; Councilman Bay stated that, in his opinion, the sign violation had little or nothing to do with the issue of voting on the Entertainment Permit. He assumed that Code Enforcement Division would take action on the flashing neon sign that was not permitted whether or not they approved the Entertainment Permit Application. 439 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. Councilman Roth moved to approve the request for an Entertainment Permit Application submitted by Scott Ernest Slayton, Humdinger #4, 2660 West Lincoln ~venue, to permit one dancing girl, seven days a week, from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. ~efore a vote was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood stated she was going to vote against the motion, because the business presented a poor image for the City and the neighborhood, and it had deteriorated the area. There was such a proliferation of similar requests she did not think they needed to have one more. Mayor Roth asked if any letters of opposition had been received; Miss Santalahti answered "no." A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion and failed to carry by the following vote: Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: AB~'~NT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt and Roth Kaywood, Pickler and Bay None The subject Entertainment Permit Application was, therefore, disapproved. 179' CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2405 - CLARIFICATION OF CONDITIONS OF APiKOVAL: Annika Santalahti, Assistant Director for Zoning, explained that relative to the subject, the problem was basically that the lease date had never been identified by the petitioner and, further, that it was not staff's intent that the School District under the Conditional Use Permit would be required to construct the block wall unless the use on the property changed. The proposed resolution had a blank space under Condition No. 9 where the expiration date of the lease could be inserted. The Mayor asked if a representative from the School District was present; no one was present. Cou'cilwoman Kaywood noted that in a letter dated May 9, 1983, from the Centralla gchool District (made a part o~ the record), the expiration date the lease was stated as June 30, 1988. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 83R-217 for adoption, amending Resolution No. 83R-113 nunc pro tunc. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 83R-217: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2405 AS SET FORTH IN RESOLUTION NO. 83R-113, NUNC PRO TUNC. 44O City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. Before a vote was taken, Councilman Bay asked for clarification if the change merely clarified the date of the lease. City Attorney William Hopkins answered that was correct. It would be five years from the date of the lease and Condition No. 9 on the revised resolution, nunc pro tunc, would be that Condition Nos. 1, 3 and 4 shall be complied with on or before June 30, 1988. He had not seen the lease but the letter stated June 30, 1988. If that was correct, it should be inserted in that blank on the second page. Councilman Bay stated that the action was then contingent on the accuracy of the School District letter; City Attorney Hopkins stated that was correct. Councilman Overholt asked what would occur if they did not comply on or before June 30, 1988; City Attorney Hopkins stated that the School District would be responsible, since they were the property owners and thus they would have to comply. Discussion then followed between the Council and the City Attorney as to why the School District would be obligated to meet the conditions and pay the fees involved, even if the use did not change, as explained by the City Attorney would be their obligation. At the conclusion of discussion, Miss Santalahti stated that the Conditional Use Permit was for a specific activity other than a public school use and if the activity were terminated prior to June 30, 1988, and they did not meet the conditions and did not use the school for anything other than a public school, or leave it vacant, then the CUP would terminate and the School District would not be obligated to meet those conditions if they did not take advantage of the CUP. Councilman Overholt asked if the business school remained on the property until June 30, 1988, and then did not renew or extend their lease, the School District would be under no obligation under the language of the conditions; Miss Santalahti stated that was correct. It was a typical zoning petition and if a petitioner wanted the CUP, they would meet the conditions but if not, they could walk out on the final day and that would close the issue. Councilwoman Kaywood also asked if the new school use were to terminate prior to June 30, 1988, would the School District be required to pay the fees; Miss Santalahti answered, "no. They would, perhaps, come back with another proposal and staff would review it again and put the same condition back in. She also explained that there was one other minor change, that being the fact that the petitioner, at the Council Meeting of March 22, 1983, submitted Exhibit 1, Revision 1, which the Planning Commission had not seen. By that revision, they deleted the block wall originally shown and, therefore, that was a change in the resolution as well. A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolution clarifying and including the expiration date of the lease as June 30, 1988, and that Exhibit 1, Revision 1, submitted by the petitioner at the Council Meeting of March 22, 1983, eliminated the block wall as originally shown. 441 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL M~MBERS: COUNCIL M~MBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 83R-217 duly passed and adopted. 108: ACROPOLIS HEALTH SPA - EXTENSION OF ABATEMENT PERIOD: Luis Lee and Theodora Helen De Carvalho, Acropolis Health Spa, 2629 West Lincoln Avenue, requesting an extension of the abatement period pursuant to Code Subsection 4.29.030 relating to exceptions to the requirements of Chapter 4.29. Submitted was a report dated May 27, 1983, from the City Attorney's office recommending that the Council conduct a hearing as required by Section 2 of Ordinance No. 4409 and grant or deny an extension of time to abate a nonconforming use, based upon a determination as to whether such an extension was reasonably necessary to prevent undue hardship. A report was also submitted from the 'Police Department dated May 23, 1983, recommending that the applicant be denied an extension from complying with AMC Ordinance No. 4409. The Mayor asked to hear from the petitioner. Mr. Luis De Carvalho, owner of the Acropolis Health Spa, explained that he was applying for an extension of time because of hardship, since there was still an amount outstanding on debts of approximately 345,000. They were also responsible for one year on the lease of the premises and one year on the air conditioning. He had the leases with him, which he submitted. They were the original leases starting in August of 1979 until July 1984. The air conditioning lease was also from i979 until October of 1984. Councilman Bay stated the way he understood the request for abatement was that Acropolis had been operating and meeting the present Ordinance, but the recent Ordinance change (Ordinance No. 4409, adopted March 29, 1983) provided that rather than a chiropractor signing prescriptions for massages, it would require a medical doctor's signature. He asked if the request for abatement to the Ordinance was a request for not meeting that change; Mr. De Carvalho answered that was right, $o that they could use medical doctors and chiropractors as well and not to exclude chiropractors. Councilman Bay stated they were asking then for an exception to the amended Ordinance, the abatement period for which was July 29, 1983, which was the 90-day period from the effective date of the Ordinance. MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to deny the request for an extension of the abatement period pursuant to Code Subsection 4.29.030 relating to exceptions to the requirements of Chapter 4.29. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Councilman Overholt stated that the Adult Entertainment Ordinance when it was originally passed provided for an abatement of a total period of two years and the Acropolis was one of the businesses where that was provided. He asked the City Attorney if the Council had the power to grant further abatements merely because they were eliminating one qualified referral source. 442 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. ~t~lClaim submitted by Dr. Steven J. Moore for personal property damages eft rear tire of automobile purportedly sustained due to exiting of Con~ention Center, northeast corner near Katella Avenue, on or about Apr {~10, 1983. 4. Claim submitted by Pacific National Insurance Company, Bleckert's Diesel ~pair, insured, for property damages purportedly sustained due to failure 6f traffic signal at State College Boulevard and La Palma Avenue, on or abo~April 18, 1983. 5. Claim s~mitted by Edward Glen Stubbs for personal property damages to car purportedly sustained due to an accident caused by City-owned property at Canyon Rim ~nd Via Arboles, on or about April 22, 1983. B. Applxcatxons..~or Leave to Present Late Claims rejected: 6. Application fot~.Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Carl Clippinger for inju~es purportedly sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident in the men's%\restroom in the vicinity of Anaheim Lake, on or about February 23, 198%. 7. Application for Leav~ to Present a Late Claim submitted by Frances Walker for personal prope~gy damages at 1230 South Euclid, Apartment liB, purportedly sustained due ~ negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April's21, 1982. 8. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Gladys Walker for personal property damages at 1613 West Ball Road, purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. ~ 9. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Virginia Cook for personal property damages at'-1230 South Euclid, Apartment 2OD, purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 10. Application for Leave to Present a Lk.~e Claim submitted by Catherine Shanley for personal property damages purpO~rtedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. . 11. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim submitted by Nancy Joan Hammett and Lisa Dawn Smith for personal property damages at 1612 Juno Avenue, Apartment 5, purportedly sustained due to,~.negligence on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 12. Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim kubmitted by Harvey and Lorene Demanouske for personal property damages at 1~40 West Ball Road, Apartment 209, purportedly sustained due to negligenc'~ on the part of the City with regard to the fire of April 21, 1982. 433 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. City Manager Talley stated that they would send letters to everyone who had filed a Transient Occupancy Tax this month. Councilman Overholt asked if The Phelan Group had been notified that the matter would be presented for adoption today; City Clerk Roberts answered that they were notified on May 25, 1983. Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to speak for or against the proposed increase in the Transient Occupancy Tax from 6 percent to 8 percent. Councilman Bay then gave an extensive presentation to explain his "No" vote on the Ordinance, one of his main concerns being that they were voting to approve a revenue source based on the need to balance a budget that had not yet been seen by the Council. At the conclusion of his presentation, he again reiterated he could not support the increase in the room tax. He was not in opposition to it, because he felt it was justified to use monies from that increase to bolster the capital improvements needed in the City. He felt that the Council should think strongly about a 10-year plan on capital improvements with specific amounts of money set aside for streets and storm drains on a long-term basis. The basic principle and difference of thinking between what he heard from the City administration and his thinking was that when there was a shortage in the budget, it was time to cut back, not search for new revenues. He would rather see them searching for new ways to cut the cost of government. After additional discussion between Council Members on the issue, a vote was taken on the foregoing Ordinance. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt and Roth Bay None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4431 duly passed and adopted. 114/105/124: LIAISON MEETING - COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY: Councilman Bay reported on the subject liaison meeting held May 25, 1983, which he attended with Councilwoman Kayw00d. The discussion turned to the problems of the southwest foyer entrance with the construction of the Hilton in progress and heavily used southwest parking structure. The desire was to enhance that entrance, which was cosmetic to a degree, giving the City Manager a good reason not to approve budget funds within the budget. The liaison committee recommended that the Council approve an appropriation of $60,000 from the Council Contingency Fund for the immediate enhancement of the southwest foyer entrance to the Convention Center. A cost estimate breakdown had been provided in the agenda packet and the Community Center Authority approved the architect's concept in January. 444 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. MOTION: Councilman Bay thereupon moved to appropriate ~60,000 from the Council Contingency Fund for the immediate enhancement of the southwest foyer entrance to the Convention Center. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Mr. Bill Currier, Vice Chairman of the Community Center Authority, on behalf of the Authority, thanked the Council for the action just taken. He reiterated that the full board had approved the design concept. 149/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4432: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4432 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4432: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO NO PARKING AT ANY TIME ON PORTIONS OF GILBERT STREET, LA PALMA AVENUE, MAGNOLIA AVENUE, RIO VISTA STREET, SHEPARD STREET, SOUTH STREET AND STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4432 duly passed and adopted. 142/175.137: ORDINANCE NOS. 4433 AND 4434: Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance Nos. 4433 and 4434 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4433: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF TRANSMISSION PROJECT REVENUE BONDS BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY. ORDINANCE NO. 4434: ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF NOTES BY SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA PUBLIC POWER AUTHORITY. R611 Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 4433 and 4434 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NOS. 4435 AND 4436: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance Nos. 4435 and 4436 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. 445 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. 142/175.123: ORDINANCE NO. 4435: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT FOR THE ACQUISITION OF CAPACITY AND A TRANSMISSION SERVICE CONTRACT; AND APPROVING THE ENTERING INTO OF SAID AGREEMENT AND CONTRACT. (Southern California Public Power Authority) 142/179: ORDINANCE NO. 4436: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (81-82-19, RM-3000, 3529 West Savanna Street, Tract 11754) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 4435 and 4436 duly passed and adopted. 142/179: ORDINANCE NO. 4437: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4437 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4437: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (82-83-16, ML, Parcel 1, west of Douglass Road, north of Katella Avenue and Parcel 2, south of Winston Road, and west of Sunkist Street) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4437 duly passed and adopted. 142/103/179: ORDINANCE NO. 4438: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4438 for first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 4438: AN ORDINANCE OFTHE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (79-80-18, RS-A-43,000(O), east of the northeast and southeast corners of Orchard Drive and Lakeview Avenue, La Palma-Lakeview-No. 4 Annexation) 119: LOARA HIGH SCHOOL - WINNER OF THE 3-A CIF BASEBALL TITLE: Councilman Pickier announced that Loara High School was the winner of the 3-A CIF Baseball Title. His son, Scott Pickler, a member of the Loara Faculty, was also the baseball coach. Mayor Roth asked that the Public Information Office prepare a resolution and invite the team to a meeting, so that the Council could present the resolution to them. 446 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. 119: MEMORIAL DAY MARCH TO ANAHEIM CEMETERY: Both the Mayor and Councilman Bay reported on their attendance and participation in the Memorial Day March to Anahei~ Cemetery, also attended by Councilman Pickler. Councilman Bay made a special note of the fine speech prepared and delivered by City Attorney William Hopkins. Mayor Roth reported that the prime responsibility for the parade this year was the VFW with the American Legion cooperating with them and next year, the roles would be reversed as was done each year. He made a pledge that the City Council would support the parade more vigorously in the area of publicity, especially in asking for more press coverage of the event prior to its occurrence. RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: The City Attorney requested a Closed Session to discuss litigation and potential litigation with no action anticipated. Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (12:25 p.m.) AFTER RECESS AND RECESS: Mayor Roth called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present except Councilman Overholt, and on motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Council recessed to the Training Room located on the ground floor of the Civic Center. Councilman Overholt was temporarily absent. MOTION CARRIED. (1:05 p.m.) AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order in the Civic Center Training Room for the 1983-84 Resource Allocation Plan Workshop, all Council Members being present with the exception of Councilman Overholt. (1:15 p.m.) PRESENT: ABSENT: PRE SENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt (entered at 1:45 p.m.), Bay and Roth COUNCIL MEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts CITY TREASURER: Ruth Redepenning ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: James D. Ruth EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF ADMINISTRATIVE SERVICES: Les White FINANCE DIRECTOR: George P. Ferr0ne PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND AUDIT MANAGER: Ronald Rothschild REDEVELOPMENT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Norman J. Priest CITY LIBRARIAN: William J. Griffith HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ronald L. Thompson CHIEF OF POLICE: Jimmie Kennedy STADIUM/CONVENTION CENTER/GOLF COURSES DIRECTOR: Thomas Liegler PUBLIC UTILITIES GENERAL MANAGER: Gordon W. Hoyt FIRE CHIEF: Bob Simpson DATA PROCESSING DIRECTOR: Philip Grammatica CITY ENGINEER: William Devitt 447 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION AND COMMUNITY SERVICES: FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT: John Roche BENEFITS AND TRAINING MANAGER: Tom Tyre ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: Cindy King CIVIL ENGINEER - DESIGN: Art Daw Chris Jarvi 106: 1983/84 RESOURCE ALLOCATION PLAN: City Manager William Talley presented his 1983/84 Resource Allocation Plan message (see pages A-2 through A-6 of the City of Anaheim, California Resource Allocation Plan, 1983-84--on file in the City Clerk's office). His presentation would be a briefing of the transmittal message and also highlighting areas he wanted to bring to the Council's attention. After completing this year's plan, he felt it was one of the most difficult to balance in his many years of government experience, one of the reasons being they did not adopt what he considered quick fixes in preparing the plan for approval and they had played no games in balancing the budget. He then briefed the budget message, the fourth page of which listed the 1983-84 budget total amounting to ~332,336,177. The proposed plan was $30,528,515 more than the adopted 1982-83 Resource Allocation Plan of ~301,807,662, or an increase of 10.1 percent. However, without the unusual but necessary increases in expenditures which he explained and as outlined on Page A-4, the year-to-year increment in operating programs would be only 4.0 percent, or a very modest rise in the costs of providing a comprehensive program of public services. At the conclusion of his presentation, Mr. Talley turned the program over to Mr. Ronald Rothschild to brief the Resource A/location Plan Summaries following which he (Talley) would discuss policy issues. Before Mr. Rothschild's presentation, questions were posed to Mr. Talley by Council Members. Councilman Overholt entered the Civic Center Training Room. (1:45 p.m.) Program Development and Audit Manager Ronald Rothschild gave an overview and briefing on the 1983-84 Resource Allocation Plan Summaries presented in a series of slides of charts and graphs which were copies of those documents submitted (see documentation entitled--City of Anaheim--Resource Allocation Plan--1983-84, consisting of 24 pages--on file in the City Clerk's office). After questions by the Council answered by both Mr. Rothschild and Mr. Talley, Mr. Bill Devitt, City Engineer, addressed specific Capital Improvement Programs as listed in the booklet submitted entitled--Public Works Department--Capital Improvement Program--Fiscal Year 1983-84 and Planned Future Projects (on file in the City Clerk's office along with sheet entitled Resource Allocation Plan--Capital Improvement Program 1983-84 Proposed and 1984-85, 1985-86 Projected, previously briefed). Mr. Chris Jarvi, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services, then briefed the Capital Improvement Program in his department, supplemented by slides (see booklet entitled--Parks, Recreation, Community Services--Capital Improvement Program--Fiscal Year 1983-84 and Five-year C.I.P.). 448 City Hal!, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31~ 1983~ 10:00 A.M. Mr. Gordon Hoyt, Public Utilities Director, then presented and briefed the Public Utilities Department Capital Projects, both for the Electric and Water Utilities. supplemented by slides. (See documentation submitted, first page entitled-f-Anaheim Public Utilities--Department Expenditures--Summary by Category--Chart A, which included Chart A through I--also submitted was a narrativ~ briefing each chart presented. Additional documentation presented was a su~ary of Water Utility capital improvements and Electric Utility capital improvements--all documentation on file in the City Clerk's office.) Mr. Talley then set forth the following six special items which were policy issue~ to be addressed by the Council as part of their consideration of the Resource ~llocation Plan: (1) Fire protection service in the commercial- recreati~'~ area of the City. As discussed, one of the areas they were not able to accommodate was the expansion of Fire Station No. 3. In addition, they were aware that in the past year they had tried to do some work with the Cities of Orange and Garden Grove regarding a combination arrangement whereby they could meet the various needs of all communities in that area. From a policy standpoint, that was the single most important area to be addressed during the coming fiscal year, not necessarily during budget deliberations, but during the year. The greatest opportunity for cost savings would be in analyzing the total concept of fire protection service. (2) The possibility of fire permit fees in some areas. They were currently rendering services and not r~aovering fees or not recovering adequate fees. (3) West Anaheim Senior Citizens Center service level--funding requirements and reductions from other servi~e programs. During the next segment of their presentation, he would be reque ting Department Head comments and one area that needed to be addressed was i~ t~e Recreation area. They had a policy in the past whereby expansion of services were only budgeted based upon either their ability to attract revenues from non-General Fund sources, or only to the extent that the General Fund increased, they could increase a like percentage in Recreation services. The West Anaheim Senior Citizens Center was opened last year and if they tried to use traditional standards on those service levels, they would have to make significant reductions in other programs. (4) City-wide costs of legal services. Additional information would be provided during the City Attorney's presentation. (5) Extension of street lighting systems using the 1911 Act. As was presented, in a ~9 million project budget, ~70,000 was coming from the General Fund. Traditionally, the General Fund paid for street light extensions. He wanted the Council to consider the 1911 Act procedures to allow those General Funds to be diverted to what they considered more pressing projects. (6) Transient Occupancy Tax receipt allocations. The budset wam out of balance approximately $1.9 million. They recommended consideration of an increase from § percent to 8 percent in the Transient Occupancy Tax. With the July 1 effective date, they would be collecting revenues beginning August 30, 1983. In their analysis, between $600,000 and $700,000 in additional funds wouid be available and they had prepared a list of alternative allocations of additional funds (see--Alternative Allocations of Additional Transient Occupancy Tax--S700,000, which also included a listing of recommended alternatives--on file in the City Clerk's office) which he briefed. The alternate total was ~2,259,601. In his mind, however, they prioritized them as listed on that document at the bottom of which was listed 449 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. recommended alternatives as follows: Community Services Level of Service Restoration, ~39,000; Recreation Program Level of Service Restoration, 513,600; Katella Area Improvements, 5212,400~ Santa Ana Street Reconstruction - Anaheim to Harbor, 5220,000; Citron Street Reconstruction - La Palma to North Street, 3215,000. The foregoing would be his recommendations on priorities, but that left another 31.5 million of what he considered urgent either infrastructure or necessary public improvements that the Council could consider as something to dialogue while moving through the budget reviews. After the foregoing presentation, followed by Council questions, the following department heads gave a brief overview of their budgets: Chris Jarvi, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services; John Roche, Facility Maintenance Superintendent; William J. Griffith, City Librarian; Bob Simpson, Fire Chief; Garry McRae, Human Resources Director; Ruth Redepenning, City Treasurer; Jimmie Kennedy, Chief of Police; Linda Roberts, City Clerk; Thomas Liegler, Stadium/Convention Center/Golf Courses Director; Ronald Thompson, Planning Director; Philip Grammatica, Data Processing Director; Norman Priest, Executive Director Community Development; William P. Hopkins, City Attorney; George Ferrone, Finance Director. During his presentation, City Attorney Hopkins pointed out that the North Orange County Court was expanding and adding new court rooms as well as a new wing which would house the Anaheim City Attorney's Prosecution Section. Judge Betty Elias, the Presiding Judge of the North Orange County Municipal Court, had requested his office to staff the additional court facilities. He considered the project of criminal activities to be a very vital service offered to the citizens of Anaheim. He was informed that the Resource Allocation Plan, as presented, did not provide for the additional staff required in order to handle the new court requirements. He thereupon requested that during budget deliberations, the Council consider giving the City Attorney a budget increase that would enable them to staff the new court facilities. Mark Logan, Assistant City Attorney, had prepared a brief slide presentation on the economics of the Criminal Prosecution Section which he requested be presented at this time. Mr. Mark Logan, Assistant City Attorney in charge of the Criminal Prosecution Section of the City Attorney's office, stated that the profits to the City in criminal prosecution had been well established. The job was not completed with the apprehension of a suspect, but when the suspect was prosecuted properly. He noted they had an extremely small budget in comparison with the overall criminal law enforcement budget. Mr. Logan then gave a slide presentation, the charts and graphs for which were submitted in booklet form entitled Anaheim City Attorney's Office Criminal Prosecution Section (on file in the City Clerk's office). In finality, they were asking for two additional prosecutors and a secretary. City Attorney Hopkins explained for Councilman Bay that the cost for the additional personnel was 584,416. 45O City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - May 31, 1983, 10:00 A.M. Comments and questions were then received from Council Members specifically noting their areas of concern regarding the budget overview. City Manager Talley then submitted the City of Anaheim Resource Allocation Plan 1983-84, along with the 1983-84 Resource Allocation Plan Executive Summary, to the City Council. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Roth moved to adjourn. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:35 p.m.) LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK 451