1982/08/10Qity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, !~82, !:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
REDEVELOPMENT PROPERTY SERVICES MANAGER: Robert G. Lyons
ACTING POLICE CHIEF: Jimmie Kennedy
SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry
CODE ENFORCEMENT SPECIALIST: John W. Poole
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR--ZONING: Annika Santalahti
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR--PLANNING: Joel Fick
POLICE CAPTAIN: Dale A. Wilcox
POLICE DETECTIVE: James H. Watkins
Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: The Reverend Tom Favreau, Melodyland Hotline Center, gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Irv Pickler led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: INTRODUCTION: Earline Jones introduced Margaret Volz, Miss Anaheim/Miss
America 1982.
Mayor'Roth, on behalf of the Council and the City, welcomed Miss Volz and
congratulated her on her new title. He then presented her with a briefcase
with the City Seal. (Roses were previously presented to Miss Volz.)
Miss Volz stated it was an honor and a pleasure to represent Anaheim and she
hoped that she could make the Council as proud of her as they were of Anaheim.
119: PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Roth and
authorized by the City Council:
Naming the City "Ramaheim" on August 14, 1982, the first home game of the Rams.
119: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION: A Resolution of Appreciation was
unanimously adopted by the City Council to be presented to the Anaheim
Community Band and its director, Ross Davis, for 14 years of entertainment
residents and visitors.
MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meeting held May 25, 1982. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. Councilman
Pickler abstained, since he was not a member of the City Council at that
time. MOTION CARRIED.
699
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES -- August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.~.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda,
after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to
waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Bay seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $11,710,657.15, in
accordance with the 1982-83 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Pickler,
seconded by Councilman Roth, the following items were approved in accordance
with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council
Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilman Pickler offered
Resolution Nos. 82R-407 through 82R-415, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer
to Resolution Book; Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance No. 4359 for first
reading.
1. 118: The following claims and amended claims filed against the City were
denied and referred to Risk Management, as recommended by Risk Management:
a. Claim submitted by Jerry Nilsson for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of the City at 1314
South Euclid, on or about April 21, 1982.
b. Claim submitted by United Pacific/Reliance, Valbour Rennet Trust,
Insured, for property damages purportedly sustained due to failure of the
City to construct and maintain power lines and to maintain City tree
planting at 1311 South Euclid, on or about April 21, 1982.
c. Claim submitted by Truck Insurance Exchange; Fire Insurance Exchange;
Farmers Insurance Exchange, H. and C. Barsky, Insured, for personal
property damages purportedly due to failure of City to maintain power line
and trees at 938 Roberts, #8, on or about April 21, 1982.
d. Claim submitted by Truck Insurance Exchange; Fire Insurance Exchange;
Farmers Insurance Exchange, Wladyslow and Danuta Michalski, Insured, for
personal property damages purportedly due to failure of City to maintain
power line and trees at 1660 West Palm Lane, on or about April 21, 1982.
e. Claim submitted by Allstate Insurance, Sam and Ida Sklar, 1040 West
Ball Road; Oscar and Gertrude Muller, 1645 Palm Lane, #24; Russell
Schieffler, 1660 West Palm Lane, #8; Sara Siegel, 1640 West Ball Road,
#101; Linda Renye, 1660 West Palm Lane, #90; Timothy and Judy Ellis, 1645
West Palm Lane, #45; Robert and Helen Diehl, 1645 West Palm Lane, #15;
Moss and Jean Parkin, 1645 West Palm Lane; Joseph and Yetta Silverman,
1600 West Palm Lane; Ruth Miller, 1645 West Palm Lane, #51; Charles and
Nancy Amarel, 1230 South Euclid, #28-C; Blanche Soloman, 1600 West Palm
700
CitE Ha~, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Au~u.~t 1.0.,..1982, 1:30 P.M.
Lane, #36; Abraham and Helen Landsman, 1600 West Palm Lane, #55; Miriam
Freedman, 1600 West Palm Lane, #63; and Harvey and Irene Demanouske, 1640
West Ball Road, #209, Insureds, for personal property damages purportedly
sustained due to negligence, carelessness, and wrongfulness of the City of
Anaheim in maintaining power lines and trees in and around their
residences, on or about April 21, 1982.
f. Claim submitted by Rose La Greza for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to loose gravel on South Street between State
College Boulevard and Sunkist street hitting and cracking claimant's car's
windshield, on or about June 22, 1982.
g. Claim submitted by Karen Larssen for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to an accident caused by a malfunctioning traffic signal at
or near the intersection of State College Boulevard and the west bound
offramp of State Route 91, on or about March 1, 1982.
h. Claim submitted by Pacific Telephone Company for property damages
purportedly sustained due to actions of City contractor damaging
underground telephone facilities with a backhoe while excavating for a
storm drain at the northwest corner of Rio vista and Lincoln Avenue and
the southeast corner of Rio Vista and Lincoln Avenue, on or about April 23
and 25, 1982.
i. Claim submitted by Dennis Ray Garrett for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to negligence on the part of Stadium security at
Anaheim Stadium, on or about June 23, 1982.
j. Claim submitted by Big Harry's, aka Harry Colwell, for property
damages purportedly sustained due to overflow in the City sewage system at
309 North Manchester, on or about June 28, 1982.
k. Amended claim submitted by Autombile Club of Southern California,
subrogee of Robert H. Huckenpahler, for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to an accident caused by a malfunctioning
traffic signal at Harbor Boulevard and South Street, on or about April 8,
1982.
1. Amended claim submitted by Kathy M. Cr0cevera for personal injuries
purportedly sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident at Anaheim Stadium,
on or about May 10, 1982.
2. The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. 105: Public Utilities Board--Minutes of July 22, 1982.
b. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission--Minutes of April 28, May 5,
12, 19, and 26, June 9 and 30, and July 21, 1982.
701
C~tl Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
3. 140: Accepting $650.22 resulting from payment of lost or damaged Library
book fines and appropriating said amount into various Library Material
Accounts.
4. 123: Authorizing an agreement with David M. Griffith and Associates,
Ltd., in an amount not to exceed $17,500, as consultants for the development
of cost allocation plans, to be completed by December 31, 1982, and waiving
Council Policy No. 401 relating to competitive bidding.
5. 151: Authorizing an Encroachment License with Western Medical
Center/Anaheim to allow the encroachment of a small sign structure, consisting
of two standards and a double-faced sign, within a small portion of City
right-of-way on the west side of Anaheim Boulevard, north of Ball Road.
(81-8E)
6. 139: Opposing the Cable Telecommunications Act of 1982, S. 2172, and
authorizing the Mayor to execute letters of opposition to Senators S. I.
Hayakawa and Alan Cranston.
7. 160: Authorizing a change order to the purchase order with U. S. Pipe and
Foundry, in the amount of $45,419.04 for ductile iron pipe and fittings, Bid
No. 3778.
8. 160: Accepting the bid of S&J Chevrolet, in the amount of $56,865.54 for
one cab/chassis in accordance with Bid No. 3886.
9. 160: Accepting the low bid of General Electric Company, in the amount of
$21,144.88 for two 12.47KV three-phase, 900KVAR padmount capacitor banks in
accordance with Bid No. 3880.
10. 160: Accepting the low bid of McMahan Desk, in the amount of $13,542.54
for installation of modular walls in the Utilities Department in accordance
with Bid No. 3883.
11. 123: Affirming the termination of the contract with the National Center
for Municipal Development relating to representation in Washington, and
directing staff to send a letter of termination; and authorizing an agreement
with E. Del Smith and Company, Inc., at ~70 per hour, for representation in
Washington on an az-needed basis during Fiscal Year 1982-83, for a six-month
trial period, and waiving Council Policy No. 401.
12. 150: Accepting a donation from Carl Karcher Enterprises, in the amount of
$250, for the Senior citizens Lunch Program, and appropriating said funds into
Program No. 01-278, Senior Citizens.
13. 123: Authorizing an agreement with Deloitte, Haskins and Sells, in an
amount not to exceed $6,000, to perform a review and evaluation of the City's
internal audit program, to be completed not later than October 15, 1982.
702
Qity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
14. 123: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-407: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COOPERATION AGREEMENT
NO. 15 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF CYPRESS STREET STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS WITH
THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. (Neighborhood Area II, bounded by Claudina
Street, Cypress Street, Atchison Street and Lincoln Avenue)
15. 123: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-408: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF COOPERATION AGREEMENT
NO. 16 FOR THE INSTALLATION OF RIGHT-OF-WAY AND PUBLIC WORK IMPROVEMENTS.
(HERITAGE SQUARE)
16. 107: ORDINANCE NO. 4359: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
TITLE 16, CHAPTER 16.08, SECTION 16.08.080 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
PERTAINING TO AUTOMATIC SPRINKLER SYSTEMS.
17. 107: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-409: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE
LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES,
MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER,
FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE
THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: DEMOLITION AND SITE CLEARANCE FOR WORK TO
BE DONE AT 1041 NORTH PATT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CONTRACT NO.
BG82-1, ACCOUNT NO. 25-214-6640. (Hintz Wrecking Co., Inc., $1,350)
18. 156: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-410: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO CONDUCT AN AUCTION OF
UNCLAIMED PROPERTY ON AUGUST 21, 1982. (9:00 a.m. at 425 South Harbor
Boulevard, and in the event of inclement weather, conduct said auction on
August 28, 1982)
Directing the City Clerk to publish a legal notice of said auction and of the
City's intent to transfer certain unclaimed property to the Purchasing
Division for City use.
19. 140: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-411: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE POLICIES ESTABLISHED BY THE ANAHEIM LIBRARY
BOARD FOR THE USE OF LIBP, ARY MEETING ROOMS AND THE FEES AND CHARGES REQUIRED,
PURSUANT THERETO AND AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79R-139.
20. 120: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-412: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE
THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE. (949 North Mohican Avenue, as defined
under Section 6.44.010 of the Code)
21. 120: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-413: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENT TO CONDUCT A PUBLIC HEARING TO DETERMINE
THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE. (1754 West Catalpa Avenue, as defined
under Section 6.44.010 of the Code)
703
Citl Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
22. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-414: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION.
(Mobil Oil Corporation)
23. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-415: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES.
(R/W #2800-30, Anaheim Boulevard Widening)
24. Authorizing an agreement with Seamark Associates in an amount not to
exceed $52,000, plus no more than $3,000 for out-of-pocket expenses, to
conduct a clerical work improvement project in the Police Department.
25. Approving the 1981-82 write-off of uncollectible Miscellaneous Accounts
Receivable totalling $78,901.08 and Convention Center uncollectible accounts
totalling $27,311.55.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 82R-407 through 82R-415,
both inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
114: PROPOSED COUNCIL POLICY - COUNCIL REQUESTS FOR DRAFTING OF AN
ORDINANCE: Discussed at the meeting of July 27, 1982--see minutes that date.
Councilwoman Kaywood moved to establish a Council Policy that all Council
requests to the City Attorney for drafting of an ordinance shall be made
during a Council meeting. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, Mayor Roth stated he was going to continue to oppose
the motion; Councilman Bay stated he, too, was going to oppose the motion. He
did not see any strong reason for changing the present procedure where one
week an ordinance was introduced and the next week offered for adoption, with
the possibility at that time to continue it or amend it, if the Council so
de~ired it.
Councilman Overholt stated by having the request made at a public meeting, the
City Attorney would be responding to a request made by a Council Member, and
the following week a first reading would take place. He felt it was a matter
of courtesy to other Council Members.
After further discussion between Council Members, a vote was taken on the
foregoing motion and failed to carry by the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M_EMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt and Kaywood
Pickler, Bay and Roth
None
704
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, !:30 P.M.
114: REVISION OF COUNCIL POLICY NO. 106 RELATING TO THE AGENDA: Councilman
Roth moved to approve Revised Council Policy No. 106, effective August 31,
1982, relating to the agenda of the City Council, as submitted by the City
Clerk, as follows. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
"City Council meetings will commence at 10:00 a.m. It is the policy of the
City Council that in general, the Council Agenda are to be structured in the
following manner:
1. Call to Order 5. Departmental Reports
2. Invocation 6. Planning Commission Items
3. Pledge of Allegiance 7. Ordinances
4. Proclamations 8. Requests
9. Public Hearings (1:30 p.m.)
Matters set on a Consent Calendar will be acted upon by one motion or
one roll call vote provided, however, that when any member of the
Council, Staff or Public wishes that a matter be heard or acted upon
separately, it may be removed from the Consent Calendar.
It is the policy of the City Council that public hearings before the
City Council will be scheduled at 1:30 p.m. In the event that the
City Council determines that any public hearing should be held in the
evening, it may set such public hearing for an evening meeting.
It is the policy of the City Council that only those items scheduled
for a Tuesday Council meeting which are in the Office of the City
Clerk by 5:00 p.m. on the preceding Tuesday, will be considered by
the City Council at said meeting.
Public inquiries and requests requiring departmental reports and
Council action will be scheduled at the earliest meeting after
receipt of those reports by the City Clerk's Office. Only those
departmental items which are in the Office of the City Manager prior
to 5:00 p.m. on the preceding Tuesday of a Council meeting, will be
considered by the City Council at said meeting."
106: DETERMINATION OF PRIORITIES RELATIVE TO THE FUNDS RESERVED BY
THE COUNCIL IN THE 1982-83 RESOURCE ALLOCATION PLAN: Continued from
the meeting o~ July 20, 1§8~ (see minutes that Hate).
City Manager William Talley briefed the Council on memorandum dated
August 3, 1982, from the Program Development and Audit Manager,
Ronald Rothschild.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved that $640,000 be placed in a permanent
reserve fund set up in the manner suggested in the staff report
(PD&A) dated August 3, 1982, creating a General Fund Balance
Designated for Contingencies, with interest applied. Councilman
Pickler seconded the motion.
705
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
Before action was taken, Councilman Bay stated the issue was whether
they established a reserve or a temporary reserve with
pre-allocation. He would speak in advance of the pre-allocation
because he wanted to see a permanent reserve. He clarified that by
permanent he meant the use of the Contingency Reserve would be at the
discretion of the majority of the Council and that it would be in a
separate account in the accounting structure, drawing its own
interest, and thereby building.
Mayor Roth stated he was supportive of the $640,000 being placed in
reserve until it was clear that they would have a full Rams football
season. He also clarified for Councilman Overholt that he was in
opposition to establishing any tentative priorities relative to that
reserve at this time.
Councilman Bay clarified the intent of his motion was a permanent
reserve. In order to handle it from an accounting standpoint, as
recommended within the staff report, it was to be established as a
reserve so that it would not be pre-allocated. Any time there were
three votes, it could be changed. He wanted an ongoing reserve
because they could not always predict contingencies such as cuts in
bail-out funds, a hotel not being finished on time, a football or
baseball strike, or a rainy season causing damage to the Anaheim
Hills Golf Course. It was his intent to set a permanent reserve with
an accounting structure.
Councilwoman Kaywood expressed her coucern over Councilman Bay's
recommendation, since all the high priority items discussed
previously should have, or could have been approved, had not the
strike possibility surfaced. She would perhaps be in favor of a
reserve starting next year, but not this, since it would be
counter-productive. Considering the present economy, it would be an
ideal time to go out for bids on the projects that were prioritized.
She was opposed to a permanent reserve at this time.
The Mayor stated that he was not totally in support of a permanent
reserve at this time~ but he did not want to allocate any funds until
it was clear that every Rams game would be played this season;
Councilman 0verholt stated he would like the Mayor to offer that as
an amended motion, because his (Overholt's) concern was the permanent
reserve as well.
Councilman Pickler stated that the priority list was not going to go
away, and the strike was a possibility. However, any time they
decided to do so, they could take the $640,000 and commit it to the
priority list. He felt they were all saying the same thing--whether
a permanent or temporary reserve, they could still do the same thing.
706
.Citl Ha!l,. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August .1.q,...1.~82, 1:30 P.M.
Councilman Overholt stated he subscribed to the Mayor's concept, to
set the money aside as a hedge against the football strike. If that
were no longer the case, he would not be adverse to prioritizing at
that time, but he was not willing to back off opposing a permanent
reserve, since he considered it'foolish at this time.
Mayor Roth stated he was going to support the motion for the
permanency, although after the football season, he was going to ask
the City Manager to place the matter back on the agenda for review at
that time.
MOTION: Councilman Overholt offered an amended motion that the
$640,000 be set aside in reserve to provide some protection in the
event of a football strike in the current season, and that if and
when such a risk was no longer present, that the Council direct its
attention to prioritizing those funds. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded
the motion.
Councilman Bay spoke against the amendment, since at present,
non-allocated reserves were already a basic and important part of the
budget.
A vote was then taken on the amended motion and failed to carry by
the following vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood and Overholt
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler, Bay and Roth
A vote was then taken on the original motion offered by Councilman Bay.
Council Members Kaywood and Overholt voted "no." MOTION CARRIED. (See
amended vote below.)
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to direct the City Manager to again place the
foregoing item on the agenda for consideration after it was determined that
there was to be no football strike, or after a possible football strike was
over. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Overholt stated, in the spirit of the motion just passed, he would
change his vote on the motion offered by Councilman Bay, setting a permanent
reserve. (The vote on the foregoing motion by Councilman Bay was, therefore,
amended as follows:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood)
City Manager Talley stated that they now had $120,000 remaining to be
allocated.
707
City Hall, Anaheim, California -- COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982,..~:.%0. P.M.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to approve the following, representing the
approximate $120,000 remaining to be prioritized from the priority list: Item
12, $10,000, Police Mobile Command Post; Item 14, $47,258 ($942 or 2 percent
was subtracted from this item, originally $48,200); Item 15, $16,675; Item 16,
$45,750--the latter three items for Convention Center equipment, furniture and
refurbishing. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
181: ANAHEIM CULTURAL ARTS CENTER: Mr. Earl Dahl, President, was present to
discuss the status and future plans of the Cultural Arts Center.
Mr. Earl Dahl, 1807 Chalet, speaking as Chairman of the Anaheim Foundation for
Culture and the Arts, first presented a brochure to the Council, which he had
prepared, giving the financial status of the Foundation, membership, and other
information pertinent to the operation of the Cultural Arts Center (see
booklet on file in the City Clerk's office--The Anaheim Center for Culture and
the Arts--1982). He was present to respond to any questions.
Mr. Dahl then answered questions posed by the Council, particularly Councilman
Bay's question asking the plans for the Cultural Arts Center in the coming
year from a financial standpoint. At the conclusion of discussion and
questioning, Councilman Bay asked that they be provided with a record of the
last three or four years as to how much fundraising the Foundation
accomplished from a net standpoint, and the Foundation's goals for the next
three to five years and, further, how the Council could help in raising those
funds.
156: INTERNATIONAL POLICE OLYMPICS: Request of James H. Watkins for use of
City time while attending the International Police Olympics, held in Austin,
Texas, August 3 through 8, 1982, was submitted.
Detective James Watkins briefed his request contained in his memorandum dated
July 22, 1982, that he be granted the use of City business time during his
participation in the International Police Olympics in Austin, Texas, August 3
through 8, 1982.
Councilman Bay first clarified that the issue did not concern Jim Watkins
personally. He then stated he was going to oppose the request because he was
concerned it would set a precedent. They did approve tax dollars for Police
Officers to compete in the State Police Olympics, as well as Firemen Eot the
Firemen's Olympics. He could foresee a number of similar requests from other
City employees,
Mayor Roth took an opposite view. Detective Watkins was a "shining star"
among the award winners and extolled the virtues of the Anaheim Police
Department and its officers. He was a credit to both his Department and the
City.
708
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, ..~.~.~2,...~:.~e P.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood did not feel the issue was Detective Watkins and she had
wrestled with the subject over the years. No other cities gave vacation time
to attend such events, and after the budget "crunch" where they did not have
enough money for other projects, she was also willing to oppose the request,
as they could not open the door to similar requests.
Detective Watkins stated that in the future, they too would look for ways to
save the City money and make up a separate proposal for participation in
future Olympics.
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to approve the request of Detective Watkins for
the use of City time while attending the International Police Olympics.
Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. Council Members Kaywood, Pickler and
Bay voted "no." The motion of approval failed to carry.
Acting Police Chief Jimmie Kennedy then reported that in the International
Olympics, after winning a gold'medal in the State competition, Detective
Watkins won a silver medal in the ll0-meter high hurdles with a time of 15.8
seconds, equaling the time he ran the same event when he was a sophomore in
high school. He was 1/lO0th of a second behind the winner.
RECESS: On motion by Councilman Pickler, seconded by Councilman Bay, the
Council recessed for ten minutes. MOTION CARRIED. (2:57 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (3:03 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS--AGENCY: Chairman Roth reconvened the Redevelopment Agency
meeting, all Agency Members being present. (3:03 p.m.)
123/161.123: JOINT PUBLIC HEARING - ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY/CITY
COUNCIL: To consider a proposed Disposition and Development Agreement with
the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Building, Inc., and Obie Moore relating to
land located on the southeast corner of "Old" Lincoln Avenue and Anaheim
Boulevard in Redevelopment Project Alpha, known as Parcel 4b.
Mr. John Buchanan, Development Services Manager, briefed the Council/Agency on
memorandums dated July 29 and July 30, 1982, from the Executive Director of
Community Development, Norman Priest, recommending, (1) the certification of
an initial ~tudy of Environmental Impact, finding that no further
environmental documentation was necessary as the result of the sale of certain
real property and terms of a Disposition and Development Agreement, (2)
approving the sale of certain real property and approving the proposed
Disposition and Development Agreement thereto, between the Agency and the
Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Building, Inc., (Obie Moore, developer), (3) that
the City Council adopted a negative declaration with respect to the proposed
Disposition and Development agreement with the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce
Building, Inc., and Obie Moore, finding that the consideration for the sale of
the property thereunder is not less than fair market value in accordance with
covenants and conditions governing such sales; and approving the sale of such
709
C. ity Hall, Anaheim,...Cal_if_o_r_nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
property and said Disposition and Development Agreement and, (4) that the
Agency, approve a lease agreement with the Chamber of Commerce Building, Inc.,
and Obie Moore, for 94 parking spaces in the parking structure to be
constructed east of the E1Camino building, with a one-time payment of $1,000
per space, for a term of 55 years.
Following Mr. Buchanan's presentation, Mr. William Woods, developer, briefed
the Council/Agency on the background of the project since its inception. Also
present to assist him were Tom Gillman, Sunset Construction, contractor, and
Mel Miller, immediate past Chairman of the Chamber of Commerce and Chairman of
the Finance Committee of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce Building.
Mr. Tom Gillman, 2390 Orangewood Avenue, described the building and its
orientation, supplemented by site plans and elevations, which were posted on
the Chambers wall; Mr. Mel Miller, 5311 Yale, Westminster, confirmed support
from the business community for the project. He stated there were many
reasons to believe it would be a successful project for the benefit of the
Chamber and also for the benefit of the City and the Redevelopment Area.
Mr. John Yench, Anaheim Bulletin, asked the specific location of the project;
Mr. Bob Lyons, Property Services Manager, clarified that it was on the
southeast corner of Anaheim Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue.
The Mayor/Chairman asked if anyone else wished to speak.
Mr. Daniel Finkelman, 840 Haverferd, Los Angeles, asked if the project
encompassed the Jacobs property on Lincoln Boulevard; Mr. Lyons answered,
"yes." Mr. Finkelman stated in that case, the City did not yet own the
property, but the Jacobs did. Condemnation proceedings had started but had
not progressed to the point where the property should be up for sale at this
time.
Mr. Herb Weiser, Special Counsel for the Redevelopment Agency, reported that
the proceedings had been commenced to acquire the property and the present
procedure was routine and standard. He saw nothing unusual in this situation
over others considered by the Council/Agency in the past.
Mr. Herbert Licker, 1571 West Katella, stated that he was sent by Mr. Honig,
attorney for the landowners, and represented Mrs. Weimer and her associates in
the matter to protest on behalf of Weimer and Associates on the basis that
they felt the project, as presently conceived, was not the most favorable to
the community and people of Anaheim, as compared to what would have happened
if their original plan had been subscribed to and accepted.
Mr. Herbert Weiser then submitted a new Page Four of Attachment 4 for the
record, as changing the agreement now before the Council/Agency.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, the Mayor/Chairman closed
the public hearing.
710
C~Z ~all, Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982,..~:30 .P.M..
Council/Agency Member Roth offered Resolution No. ARA82-43, ARA82-44, and
82R-416 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA82-43: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
CERTIFYING AN INITIAL STUDY WHICH FINDS AND DETERMINES THAT THE PROPOSED SALE
AND REDEVELOPMENT OF CERTAIN PROPERTY LOCATED IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ALPHA
WILL HAVE NO SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND THAT A SUBSEQUENT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NEED NOT BE PREPARED.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA82-44: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING THE PROPOSED SALE OF REAL PROPERTY IN REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ALPHA;
APPROVING THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT PERTAINING
THERETO; AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF SAID DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-416: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CERTIFYING THE INITIAL STUDY WITH RESPECT TO THE PROPOSED DISPOSITION
AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE
ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF COMMERCE BUILDING, INCORPORATED, A CALIFORNIA CORPORATION,
AND OBIE MOORE, AN INDIVIDUAL, AND FINDING THAT THE CONSIDERATION FOR THE SALE
OF THE PROPERTY THEREUNDER IS NOT LESS THAN FAIR MARKET VALUE IN ACCORDANCE
WITH COVENANTS AND CONDITIONS GOVERNING SUCH SALE; AND APPROVING THE SALE OF
SUCH PROPERTY AND SAID DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS:
COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS:
COUNCIL/AGENCY MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor/Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA82-43, ARA82-44 and 82R-416 duly
passed and adopted.
MOTION: Agency Member Roth moved to authorize a lease agreement with the
Chamber of Commerce Building, Inc., and Obie Moore for 94 parking spaces, in
the parking structure to be constructed east of the E1Camino Building, with a
one-time payment of $1,000 per space, for a term of 55 years. Agency Member
Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT OF THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY: Agency Member Bay moved to adjourn.
Agency Member Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:26 p.m.)
120: PUBLIC HEARING - PUBLIC NUISANCE - 632 SOUTH WILDE PLACE: To determine
the existence of a public nuisance at 632 South Wilde Place, (Tract No. 2155,
Lot 21), Elbert J. Shannon, owner, and to abate in whole or part.
The Mayor asked to hear from those who wished to speak.
Mr. Frank Lowry, Senior Assistant City Attorney, stated that the occupant of
the premises wished to address the Council with a request.
711
qit~. H~l!.,....Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
Mr. Elbert Shannon, 632 South Wilde, explained that he had worked with Mr.
Poole, Code Enforcement Officer, and the Planning Division, and was asking for
a 60-day continuance, at which time he should be finished with the
construction work. Contractors were working at the residence today.
Mr. Lowry, in answer to Councilman Pickler, stated the City Attorney's office
did not object to the requested continuance, based upon the signed contracts
Mr. Shannon had produced and the work that had been completed in the past two
weeks. He then showed some photographs of the residence to the Council,
illustrating the progress that had taken place. (Mr. Shannon also submitted
photographs which showed that the work was near completion--made a part of the
record).
Mr. John Poole, Code Enforcement Officer, confirmed that during the past week,
a tremendous amount of progress had been made compared to the past; Mr. Lowry
reiterated that there had been adequate progress where they could not oppose a
motion for continuance.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved that the matter be continued for 60 days,
October 5, 1982, 1:30 p.m.. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, the Mayor asked if anyone else was present who wished
to speak.
Mr. Paul Murdock, 625 Wilde Place, stated that he agreed with the 60-day
continuance if the public hearing was going to be continued for 60 days. They
had lived with the situation for a number of years and it was a deterrent to
the neighborhood. The neighbors wanted the Council to know that they had a
deep interest in the matter and in their homes and would be back in 60 days if
the work was not complete.
The Mayor guaranteed that the public hearing would be held or the work would
all be completed in 60 days.
Mr. Robert E. Lewis, 637 Wilde Place, stated that he was in agreement with Mr.
Murdock and the 60-day request for continuance.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion continuing the public hearing
for 60 days, to October 5, 1982, at 1:30 p.m. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2349: Jack C. and Doris H. Chau,
to permit a public dance hall on ML zoned property located at 710 East Ka~ella
Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-127, declared
that the subject project will have no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impact due to the approval of this negative declaration,
since the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for general
industrial land uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
712
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES .T.~ugust 10, 1982, 1:30
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; and that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement
to prepare an EIR, and further, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 2349,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the Office of the Executive Director of Public Works.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit Nos.
1 through 4.
3. That the applicant shall apply for and obtain approval of a public dance
hall permit pursuant to the requirements of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
4. That no activity shall be permitted which would otherwise qualify the use
as an adult business pursuant to Chapter 18.89 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
5. That Condition Nos. 1, 2, and 3, above-mentioned, shall be complied with
prior to final building and zoning inspections, or prior to commencement of
the activity herein approved, whichever occurs first.
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilman
Pickler at the meeting of July 20, 1982, and public hearing scheduled this
date.
Mayor Roth first explained the guidelines under which the public hearing would
be conducted, and then asked to hear from the applicant or applicant's agent.
Mr. Zachary Henson, 201 North East Street, Anaheim, agent, speaking on behalf
of Jack and Doris Chou, first stated that the controversy of today's issue,
the idea of Chippendales and the negative connotation some had, was due to a
lack of education. He was a resident of Anaheim, as well as his parents
before him. He owned Tri Star Construction Company, an Anaheim-based firm.
They were proposing an entertainment nightclub and were attempting to feature
top name and top flight entertainment. Some of their shows had been on
national television, and their producer was present today, the winner of five
Emmy awards. The other two owners and himself searched to find a facility
that would be harmonious for the nightclub they were proposing, and Jack and
Doris Chou were kind enough to allow them to acquire their facility at 710
East Katella. They were attempting to spend in excess of one-half million
dollars on the facility, and selected Anaheim because they felt the need of
the people would be fulfilled. They would abide by and conform with any
agency requirements. They were familiar with the adult entertainment
ordinance of the City and would conform with all of those requirements.
713
City Ha!!, ..Anahei~,..Cal~forn%~ .T COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1.982, 1:30 P.M.
The following people then spoke in favor of Conditional Use Permit No. 2349
and were either principals involved directly or indirectly with the property,
the proposed establishment, services to be provided should the business be
established, or those interested in seeing that the CUP was approved in order
to be able to enjoy the entertainment to be offered: Mr. Nick DeNoia, 4319
Laurel Road Avenue, Studio City, Producer-Director of Chippendales. He stated
he felt what Chippendales was doing was a theatrical phenomenon, exciting,
alive and contemporary.
Mr. Jack Chou, owner of the property. They opened the facility as Miguel's
Restaurant, and in three months, the business was so poor it was more
economical to close it down. They had attempted to lease the property for
different operations. The concept of the proposed operation was very
high-class and a well-conceived artistic form. It would be of benefit to the
City in general because of all the entertainment .centers in Orange County.
Mr. Mark Botich, FTC of Anaheim, Architects, 1424 East Katella. His firm had
been selected as the architect to support the interior designers and
choreographer, show producer and general contractor in producing the drawings
and making certain of the structural integrity of the building.
Mr. Tom Zois, Vice President and Branch Manager, William George Company,
wholesaler of wines and spirits in Anaheim. He prepared a small chronicle of
the five restaurants which had previously been located at the subject
facility. Most were good, experienced restaurateurs, but for some reason were
unable to achieve continued success in'a good building with ample parking,
easy access, and a location at the intersection of a busy freeway. Thus, it
was concluded that a restaurant would have little chance of success in that
location. The change in format would bring instant and continued success and
would be a welcome addition to the business community of Anaheim.
Councilman Bay interjected and asked Mr. Zois, having named the number of
restaurants that had failed at the subject location, if it would logically
follow that, in fact, the location was properly zoned ML Industrial, its
current designation; Mr. Zois stated he believed the Alcoholic Beverage
Commission would take that into consideration.
The following people also spoke in favor of Conditional Use Permit No. 2349:
Lillian Culores, 22 West Broadway, Anaheim; §tort Dimalante, 1619~ Calatin,
Fountain Valley; John Lynch, 6242 Warner, Huntington Beach; Linda Lebrun, 316
Calico, Brea; Mr. John Yench, citizen of Anaheim, Anaheim Bulletin reporter
and Church Editor, also speaking for the Libertarian Party. Mr. Yench stated
government was established not to dictate to morals, but to serve the people
as individuals, and if a number of individuals enjoyed the kind of
entertainment proposed to be provided, government should not step in.
The Mayor then asked to hear from those in opposition.
714
Cit~ .H.a.l_l.,...Anaheim.,. C.a!i.f. qr. ni.a' .- COUNCIL MINUTES- August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
The following people spoke in opposition to the granting of Conditional Use
Permit No. 2349, their major reason being that since family and family
entertainment was of prime concern in Anaheim, if the proposed entertainment
were allowed to be established, it would not be in the best interests of
keeping with the family forum: Pastor Lou Sheldon, 2737 West Savoy Avenue,
Pastor of Trinity Church; Elizabeth Sanford, 1144 North Paradise, organist for
St. Anthony Claret Church; Maggie Anderson, 921 North Zeyn, representing St.
Boniface Church; Grant Hubbard, 1913 West Elm, representing the Church of
Jesus Christ of Latter Day Saints; Carl Funke, 1905 Clifpark Way, College
Career Pastor at Covenant Presbyterian Church; Gary Nash, 11750 Euclid,
employee at Trinity Church; Carroll Wilks, Operation Manager for Whirlpool
Corporation, 917 East Katella. Mr. Wilks stated it was the position of the
Whirlpool Corporation not to permit a public dance hall at 710 East Katella.
They had $18 million invested in their business at that location, as well as
100 female employees. They did not feel that the environment suggested was
the type of environment in which they would want to continue their business.
It would be detracting and against their best investment interests.
Mayor Roth then gave Mr. Henson an opportunity to make his summation.
Mr. Henson then spoke to some of the concerns expressed, emphasizing that the
concerns of the family were also his and that of the other two owners. The
business would not damage the society or the integrity of the City of Anaheim.
Mr. Henson then answered a line of questions posed by Councilman Pickler,
followed by questions of Council Members Kaywood and Overholt, at the
conclusion of which the Mayor closed the public hearing.
At the request of Councilman Pickler, Captain Dale Wilcox reported that the
City of Anaheim had filed a protest against the Alcoholic Beverages Commission
(ABC) license because of an improper application, but it had not gone to
hearing at this time. In checking with the ABC, Inglewood office, it was
revealed that there had been several incidents at the West Los Angeles
location of Chippendales. In checking with the Los Angeles Police Department,
there were several incidents or concerns, police problems, around the location
such as traffic accidents, people driving under the influence, urinating and
drug abuse occurring outside the premises. He did not know of any reports of
incidents inside the location.
Councilman Bay stated in listening to the pros and cons on what might be
called a moral issue, he did not believe in legislating morals, he never had,
and did not believe that was the issue today. The issue was whether or not
they were going to have good planning. The basic underlying zone involved was
the ML Industrial zone. They heard evidence and testimony where five or six
restaurants that had good experiences in other places failed at the subject
location. It was, therefore, clear in his mind that the property was zoned
correctly, but had been used incorrectly by CUP's allowing restaurants and
that type of function in a place primarily intended and well-zoned for
Industrial. He reiterated the issue was one of proper zoning and control, and
715
C~ty Hall,..Ana~eim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982, 1:30 P.M.
under Item (15)(b) of Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated June 28,
1982, (Page 4-c) submitted that the proposed use would adversely affect the
adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it was
proposed to be located, because it was an Industrial area. Further, granting
the Conditional Use Permit under the conditions proposed would be detrimental
to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of Anaheim
purely on the proper use by zoning of the land.
Councilman Pickler stated his position was to deny the position of the
Planning Commission for the reasons stated by Councilman Bay. He also felt
that even though not a part of his proposed resolution to deny, moral issues
and family issues had to be considered. Further, almost everyone who spoke in
favor lived outside of the City, while everybody in opposition lived in the
City.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Roth, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Council finds that subject
project will have no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impact due to the approval of this Negative declaration since
the Anaheim General Plan designates the subject property for General
Industrial Land Uses commensurate with the proposal; that no sensitive
environmental impacts are involved in the proposal; that the Initial Study
submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative
adverse environmental impacts; and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement
to prepare an EIR. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler offered Resolution No. 82R-417 for adoption, denying
Conditional Use Permit No. 2349, reversing the findings of the City Planning
Commission, since approval would adversely affect the adjoining land use
development and would be detrimental to the general welfare of the City of
Anaheim. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-417: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2349.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-417 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: Councilman R°th moved to recess. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:40 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (4:50 p.m.)
716
City Ha%l, Anaheim,..California- COUNCIL MINUTES - Au$.~s.~..%Q,...l~82, .1:~0 P.M.
155: COAL CANYON SHOOTING FACILITY - PROPOSED LETTER TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL
MANAGEMENT AGENCY: City Clerk Linda Roberts referred to a proposed letter
dated August 10, 1982, from the City Planning Commission, to be sent to the
Orange County Environmental Management Agency regarding the draft EIR on the
Coal Canyon Shooting Facility. It was being submitted to the Council for
their information and comments before mailing.
Mayor Roth stated, since he had not had an opportunity to read the letter, he
would like to have a staff report on the matter; Assistant Planning
Director--Planning Joel Fick then briefed the Council on report dated
August 10, 1982, subject: Coal Canyon Shooting Sports Facility. Although no
action was necessary, staff wanted to inform the Council of the Commission's
action before sending the letter to the County, unless they were otherwise
directed.
No action was taken by the Council and therefore, the letter dated August 10,
1982, from the City Planning Commission, would be forwarded to the
Environmental Management Agency.
105/183: ORDINANCE NO. 4356: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4356 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4356: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SUBSECTION
.030 OF SECTION 1.04.710 AND SUBSECTION .040 OF SECTION 1.04.995 OF CHAPTER
1.04 OF TITLE 1 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO OFFICERS AND
DEPARTMENTS. (relating to expiration of terms of Public Utilities Board and
Industrial Development Board members)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4356 duly passed and adopted.
108/179: ORDINANCE NO. 4357: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4357 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4357: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SUBSECTION
18.89.030.020 OF CHAPTER 18.89 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAMEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ZONING. (Adult Entertainment Businesses not to be located within
400 feet of residentially-zoned properties)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
Bay
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4357 duly passed and adopted.
717
Ci.t7 H~.i.i.., Anahe.im, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 10, 1982,..1.:..3.0 P..M.
ORDINANCE NO. 4358: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4358 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4358: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (81-82-7, RS-HS-22,000, Santa
Ana Canyon No. 9 Annexation)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4358 duly passed and adopted.
127: ARGUMENTS FOR AND AGAINST BALLOT MEASURES: Mayor Roth questioned the
City Clerk relative to the subject arguments and the deadline for submittal.
He also recommended assistance from the Utility Department in writing the
arguments in support of the utility measures.
City Clerk Roberts confirmed that arguments for and against the measure had to
be submitted to her office on or before August 18, 1982, at 5:00 p.m.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: The City Manager requested a Closed Session to
discuss a personnel matter with no action anticipated; the City Attorney
requested a Closed Session to discuss potential litigation with action
anticipated.
Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session. Councilwoman Kaywood
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:12 p.m.)
AFTER CLOSED SESSION: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council
Members being present. (6:26 p.m.)
153: SAFETY DISABILITY RETIREMENTS: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No.
82R-418 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-418: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO MAKE CERTAIN DETERMINATIONS AND
APPLICATIONS RELATING TO LOCAL SAFETY DISABILITY RETIREMENTS UNDER THE PUBLIC
EMPLOYEES' RETIREMENT LAW AND TO INITIATE REQUESTS FOR REINSTATEMENT OF
EMPLOYEES RETIRED FOR DISABILITY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-418 duly passed and adopted.
718
Ci~Y..Ha.l~,. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES , August 10,. 1982,._1:30 .P.M..
123: AGREEMENT WITH JUDICIAL ARBITRATION AND MEDIATION SERVICES,_INC:
Councilman Roth moved to approve an agreement between the City of Anaheim and
Judicial Arbitration and Mediation Services, Inc., and authorizing the Mayor
and City Clerk to execute said agreement. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
103: ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS - 57 FREEWAY BETWEEN BALL ROAD AND KATELLA
AVENUE: Councilman Pickler moved that staff advise the County that the City
was going to proceed with annexation proceedings in the area along the 57
Freeway between Ball Road and Katella Avenue. Councilman Overholt seconded
the motion. Councilman Bay abstained. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Roth moved to adjourn. Councilman Pickler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (6:40 p.m.)
LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK
719