1981/04/2881-629
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular
session for a workshop on the 1981-82 Resource Allocation Plan.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William T. Hopkins
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
ASSISTANT FINANCE DIRECTOR - RESOURCES: Ron Rothschild
DEPUTY CITY MANAGER: James D. Ruth
CIVIL ENGINEERING ASSOCIATE: Bob Jones
CONVENTION CENTER, STADIUM, GOLF GENERAL MANAGER: Tom Liegler
PUBLIC UTILITIES GENERAL MANAGER: C~rdon Moyt
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Norm Priest
FINANCE DIRECTOR: C~orge Ferrone
POLICE CMIEF: George Tielsch
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ron Thompson
FIRE CMIEF: Bob Simpson
HUMAN RESOURCES DIRECTOR: Carry McRae
CITY LIBRARIAN: William Griffith
DATA PROCESSING DIRECTOR: Phil Grammatica
ASSISTANT TO CITY MANAGER: James Armstrong
BENEFITS & TRAINING MANAGER: Thomas Tyre
CIVIL ENGINEER - DESIGN: Art Daw
Assistant City Manager William T. Mopkins opened the meeting, the purpose of
which was to present the 1981-82 Resource Allocation Plan (Budget). He then
deferred to City Manager William Talley.
City Manager William Talley first explained the format to be followed which
would give the Council a brief overview of the 1981-82 Resource Allocation
Plan (RAP), bring to their attention several of the major issues that they
should address from a policy standpoint at an early date, and the presentation
of the proposed Capital Improvement Projects which were extensive. Relative
to Items 5 and 6 on the Agenda (Resource Allocation Alternatives and Reorgan-
ization), he would present certain recommendations and also major problems
that they had not been able to address satisfactorily as part of the budget
making process.
Mr. Talley then gave his annual budget message (see Section A--Budget Message
of the 1981-82 Resource Allocation Plan--Proposed--Pages A-1 through A-18-
--also see news release, City Council Eyes ~356 million budget for 1981-82 in
Anaheim) stating at the outset that in spite of the uncertain economy and
unrelenting inflationary spiral, the management team took great pride in sub-
mitting a budget that was balanced, although tenuously, and subject to
numerous conditions beyond their ability to influence.
At the conclusion of Mr. Talley's presentation, Mr. Ron Rothschild, Assistant
Finance Director-Resources, presented a summary of the proposed 1981-82
Resource Allocation Plan from a fiscal standpoint supplemented by a slide pre-
sentation of the data presented to the Council (see sheets titled--Annual
81-630
City Wall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
Plan--City of Anaheim, California--covering sheet--FY 1981/82 Resource
Allocation Plan--on file in the City Clerk's office). The first slide in
brief summary form showed a fiscal year 1981-82 budget total of $356,382,361
composed of the following: Operating Progams, $117,989,166; Power and Water
Production Commodities, $111,130,780; C~neral Obligation Debt SerVice,
$62d,055; Capital Improvement Projects, $126,638,630.
In concluding his presentation of the summary of the RAP, Mr. Rothschild
stated that relative to the Capital Improvement Progams, various individuals
would present their portions of that plan. Wowever, again in a summary con-
text, the three-year Capital Improvement Plan totalled $176,852,780, most of
which was included in the first year (1981-82) with $96 million of that for
the San 0nofre project. (See sheet titled--Resource Allocation Plan--Capital
Improvement Program--1981-82 Proposed and 1982-83--1983-84--on file in the
City Clerk's office). Ne also explained that Council would be provided with a
series of maps, charts, etc., later in the meeting entitled "Anaheim Atlas"
(on file in the City Clerk's office) which provided an overall exhibit sum-
marizing all of the Capital Improvements by year, location, etcl, backed up by
individual exhibits on each functional area such as water, storm drains,
streets, traffic signals and the like. They also had gone through a forecast
of the building activity for Anaheim (see sheet--Forecast Building Activity,
City of Anaheim, FY 1981-82--on file in the City Clerk's office) and most of
the Public Works and Utility Improvements were based upon that forecast.
At the conclusion of Mr. Rothschild's presentation, the following Department
Meads gave a brief overview of the FY 1981-82 Departmental Budgets and sub-
mitted the documentation substantiating same, which presentations in some
cases were supplemented by slides and/or maps or renderings of various pro-
jects and plans:
James Ruth, Deputy City Manager (Parks, Recreation and Community Services) re-
viewed the proposed Capital Improvements for the Parks and R~creation
Department totalling $1,871,O1~ involving 20 separate projects and ten
different funding sources. In addition to the 20 projects which were iden-
tified in a slide presentation, there was another $160,000 debt service to be
paid out of park in-lieu fees and Revenue Sharing for the Golf Course property
and also for the pay-back to the Public Works Sewer Maintenance and
Construction Fund for the Pearson Park Pool.
Bob Jones, Civil Engineering Associate in the Engineering Department (sub-
stituting for City Engineer William Devitt who was ill) briefed the
(summary--Capital Improvement Projects, 1981-82) in the Engineering Department
budget totalling $13,669,719 covering nine programs, 790 through 798 inclu-
sive. (See the aforementioned summary sheet as well as Summary, Capital
Improvement Projects, 1981-82--Revenue and 13 sheets entitled Capital
Improvement Projects, 1981-82, each listing all programs separately giving the
following information--Project-Limit--Description--Cost and Total Cost of
Each--on file in the City Clerk's office).
81-631
City Mall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
Tom Liegler, Stadium, Convention Center, Coif Courses C~neral Manager, briefed
the documents entitled Stadium-Convention Center-Coif Courses Department pro-
posed "Family Foresome" Capital Projects Summary, Fiscal Year 1981-82 and
Family Foresome Budget Presentation (on file in the City Clerk's office). The
latter document indicated a total budget figure for expenditures of
$20,420,427 covering the Stadium, Convention Center and Golf Courses: the
revenue side, $25,739,115. Mr. Liegler emphasized that out of that $20
million, he was simply asking for a $2 million capital improvement program or
9.8% in behalf of the City of Anaheim's future. Upon their approval and en-
actment, he felt that investment would be repaid many fold to the citizens of
the City.
Gordon Moyt, Public Utilities General Manager, prefaced his presentation by
stating that at present the most significant item in progress on behalf of the
citizens was the Intermountain Power Project (IPP) where, under contract with
the Intermountain Power Agency (IPA) was financing and constructing an
electric generating project near Delta, Utah. Anaheim's share of that cost
was approximately $890 million. They seemed to be on budget, on schedule, and
the financings for the project were proceeding as well as they could ~xpect in
the market they were facing today.
Mr. Moyt then referred to and briefed the Council on Chart 1--Electric
Utility, Capital Improvement Projects--Summary, FY 1981-82; Chart 2, Electric
Utility, Capital Improvement Projects, use of funds detail FY 1981-82; Chart
3, Water Utility, Capital Improvement Projects--Summary, FY 1981-82; Chart 4,
Water Utility, Capital Improvement Projects, Use of Funds Detail, as well as
the maps attached thereto indicating where those improvements were to take
place in the City (all documents on file in the City Clerk's office).
Norm Priest, Executive Director, Community Development, briefed the Council on
Control Center 59, Redevelopment (Page C-292 of the RAP); Control Center 60,
Mousing Assistance (Page C-302) and Control Center 61, Community Development
Administration and Neighborhood Preservation (Page C-305). Me pointed out
that there were two things characteristic of their department which were some-
what different from other departments they had heard from this morning.
First, of the some $30 million budget projected for the department, outside of
a modest portion for the Anaheim Economic Development Corporation support
which came from the City C~neral Fund, the bulk or remainder of the depart-
ment's budget was non-General Funded. Secondly, and characteristic of
Community Development Capital Improvements, the private sector was heavily
involved in those improvements. In fact, one might argue that Community
Development existed for the purpose of making those private developments occur
and, therefore, his discussion would revolve around the activities in the
private sector which would occur as a result of the activities in his depart-
ment. Me then gave an overview of the activities taking place in the Downtown
Redevelopment Project Area relative to sale and acquisition of parcels, as
well as the Neighborhood Preservation Program which represented the long-term
strategy of the Agency as it was set forth to him when he came to the City.
Me also briefed the Council on the two bar graphs submitted, the first,
relative to Assisted Mousing and Neighborhood Preservation and the second
relative to moderate rehabilitation work and the clean-up and paint-up, fix-up
program (both graphs on file in the City Clerk's office).
81-632
City Mall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
City Manager Talley then stated in addition to what had been presented thus
far, there were certain other requests which he believed were worthy of
funding but not in the budget currently. Included as part of the package the
Council would be receiving today, was a report on each one of the following
issues which he wanted to bring to their attention.
(1) As part of the Police Department development, there were no new personnel
requested; however, a program that was requested last year but not funded and
again requested this year, was the establishment of a Canine Corps. The pro-
gram was predicted to cost $84,000, the details of which were contained in
report dated March 20, 1981 (Canine Program proposal--on file in the City
Clerk's office).
(2) A second request from the Police Department was that they begin a study
which would result in a multi-year computerized information system. They were
recommending that an extremely modest allocation of ~75,OOO be set aside
whereby the Chief of Police and the Data Processing Director could begin a
detailed description of the various components they believed would be required
in an overall data processing system. Following this year, they would then
report next year a recommendation on how the Police Department could start to
make a significant inroad into what they considered a very serious omission,
their lack of a leading edge on data processing capabilities (see memorandum
dated April 20, 1981--subject: Police Automated Systems--on file in the City
Clerk's office).
(3) Bookmobile Outreach Program: As he had previously mentioned, he was rec-
ommending that the Bookmobile, with the completion of the branch program, be
phased out effective July l, 1981. The program of approximately $68,O00 was
recommended to continue in service to provide an Outreach Program to the
City's minority population. This was a service enhancement and one that could
be funded this year out of General Revenue Sharing (see Bookmobile Outreach
Program data sheet and attachments--on file in the City Clerk's office).
(4) A second library project that he believed was worthy, but not included in
the budget, was a Theft Detection Program (see Library Theft Detection
System--on file in the City Clerk's office). Me encouraged the Council to
merely review the matter and during their budget hearing with the Library
Board, that they consider the proposed system.
(5) A major policy area he would like the Coucil to address was relative to
the final disposition of the former Harbor Center. The Library had noted a
very. serious deficiency in parking and the Police Department had brought to
their attention for the last several years, a very serious deficiency in their
available square footage for office use. With the recent major expansion in
the Police Department, they had come forward with a proposal whereby the park-
ing area would be modified somewhat and a majority of the trailers used in the
Warbor Center would be removed, but some might remain for Police Department
use. Subsequent to that, the Police Department had done a detailed study and
made a recommendation that possibly the existing trailers not be used, but
that they solicit bids and bring in new trailers to provide approximately
lO,O00 square feet for the Police Department. At the same time, they would
remove the Marbor Boulevard entrance to the Center, remove the traffic signal
81-633
City Wall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
at that location and completely redo the parking lot to provide in some way
for the parking spaces that hopefully would allow the Police Department and
Library to solve the Police Department's basic requirements for the next five
years and the library's parking requirements for an equal amount of time.
The Redevelopment Project was commited to an expenditure of an estimated
amount of approximately 5127,OO0 to restore the site to its original condi-
tion. The overall project to replace the trailers, provide the new parking
lot and new office configuration was estimated at approximately $6OO,000.
Both the Library and Police Department staff advised him that they would rec-
ommend the project. It could be financed on a multi-year program and the
Council would be provided with a memorandum dated April 27, 1981--subject:
Police Space-Library Parking Project, addressing the matter in detail (on file
in the City Clerk's office). If they had an ideal system, they were talking
somewhere in the neighboorhood of 56 million for the Police Department expan-
sion project. The recommendation by the Chief of Police would accomplish it
for approximately 10% of that which would be a five-year solution and not a
20-year solution. (Also see detail memorandum dated April 16, 1981--subject:
Police Department Building Expansion--from the Chief of Police to the' City
Manager--on file in the City Clerk's Office).
(6) They were also calling to Council's attention the benefits of a street
lighting conversion program which would place all street lights in the City
under high-pressure sodium luminaires as outlined in memorandum dated
April 2d, 1981 from the Public Utilities ~eneral Manager--subject: Conversion
of Incandescent Street Lights To Wigh-Pressure Sodium Luminaires (on file in
the City Clerk's office) which he briefed. Me would recommend that Council
consider an eventual total conversion of street lighting in the City.
(7) Ne then referred to report dated April 24, 1981 from the Traffic
Engineer--subject: Signal Assessment Fund--Status Report (on file in the City
Clerk's office) recommending a program that would keep the City at least on a
current basis relative to traffic signals, which program would cost a total of
$d69,O00.
(8) A further project that Council commissioned was a Price Waterhouse
Report, Productivity Improvement Unit--Formation Assistance Project--March 30,
1981 (on file in the City Clerk's office). In the decision for the 1981-82
RAP, there was approximately ~,000 for an initial project. IF they wanted
to fulfill the entire recommendation of Price Waterhouse, another ~75,000
should be allocated, and they were including that in a list of Alternative
Resource Allocations.
(9) Two major facilities that should also be completed at an early
date--first, the Mechanical Maintenance Repair Facility, estimated to cost
53-5 million (see memorandum dated April 2d, 1981--subject: New Mechanical
Maintenance Repair Facility--from the Mechancial Maintenance Superintendent to
the City Manager--on file in the City Clerk's office). An architect had been
secured and working drawings were in the process of being checked by the
Building Division. The land had also been purchased for that project, but
there was no current way of funding it.
81-634
City Wall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
(10) The second project, the Euclid-Cerritos Storm Drains and Laterals, esti-
mated to cost $2,410, OOO (see--Master Plan for Drainage--District 14--on file
in the City Clerk's office).
(11) A request was received from the City Attorney's office for either an
Officer Manager at $23,000 (see memorandum dated April 23, 1981--on file in
the City Clerk's office) or the City to provide two hours a day of a staff
accountant at $8400. Ne recommended that when the City Attorney's budget was
considered, that they review that subject since that was the single personnel
addition not included in the budget. We had no recommendation.
The total of the foregoing projects was $8.6 million and obviously the re-
mainder of funds in C~neral Revenue Sharing ($573,582) would not cover those.
(See Alternative Resource Allocations) not funded within the proposed 1981-82
RAP listing the above projects with their cost--on file in the City Clerk's
office.
As he told the Council earlier today, he wanted to also call their attention
to a revenue funding mechanism that they should review as part of the4RAP--the
use of what was known as Certificates of Participation. These were a new
method of financing capital projects now being used in California which had
the advantage of being treated as non-taxable instruments and which could be
issued for the life of an improvement. Me believed they could be used to
finance such things as the Mechanical Maintenance Facility, possibly the pur-
chase of this year's and perhaps next year's motor vehicle fleet, the move of
the Data Processing Facility, the fire trucks and police helicopter already
authorized, and the securing of data processing hardware. That would remove a
major part of the desirable projects that he believed they should consider
funding. There was also some possibility the Certificates might even be used
for storm drains, but that had not been examined in depth. The Finance
Director, C~orge Ferrone, was investigating this new method of financing and
he could explain how it worked.
Another of two issues not included in the RAP was relative to a report from
the Management Compensation Committee. Yesterday he met with that group com-
posed of Mr. Bill Griffith, Chairman, Fire Chief Bob Simpson and Deputy City
Manager James Ruth, with the Muman Resources Director, Garry McRae as
Secretary. They felt there was going to have to be some work done with the
Administrative Management and Staff and Supervisory people primarily in the
field of communications, possibly in compaction of salaries, and a general en-
hancement of their position in the organization. Me would be taking that on
as a project himself this year, but Council should be aware that they may be
coming back with recommendations regarding benefits in that area.
The last major area was the Betterment II debt service and while this year
there was no cash flow problem, Council had been provided with a report indi-
cating that beginning in the 1981-82 fiscal year, they were contemplating
expenditures for the Series C and D Bonds. Although there were no funds con-
templated from the hotel development at that time, beginning in 1983-84, they
were anticipating revenues from that source. Any delay in the hotel project
would obviously impact revenues in the future. It was his feeling that he
would be spending a major amount of top staff time on that project this year.
81-635
City Mall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
Finally, an item not included on today's agenda was a proposed reorganization
which had been informally discussed with the Council in the past comprised of
three major changes in operating programs. Me then briefed his seven-page
report dated April 28, 1QB1 which included Attachment A showing the proposed
organizational chart which would result upon implementation of the reor-
ganization (see report on file in the City Clerk's office). If Council had no
objection to that plan, it would be his thought to broach it again next week
at the Council meeting where they could informally begin that reorganization
with the thought that while the July 1, 1981 budget would include all the
necessary changes, they could begin integration immediately or at least as
soon as they had the budget hearing on the matter. Wis recommendation today
would be that the Council take the reorganization plan under submission and at
the earliest practicable time, react to him so that they might then institute
the necessary changes. The plan had the wholehearted support of Mr. Ruth, who
was going to be doing the major implementation, and himself and one that was
worthy of consideration.
Mr. Talley stated that concluded the entire presentation except for the forth-
coming hearing schedule, a copy of which was being distributed by Mr.'
Rothschild. On May 12, 1981, a C~neral Revenue Sharing hearing was required
for public input, but no decisions had to be made relative to that until they
adopted the entire budget. At the present time, in accordance with Council
wishes, they were presenting a schedule of hearing dates on May 19 and June 9,
1981.
Mr. Rothschild then explained that in order to meet Charter requirements, they
would have the first public hearing on the Resource Allocation Plan on May 12,
1981 which could be continued to any date the Council so desired. There would
be a public hearing on Revenue Sharing itself singularly on May 19, 1981 which
was required by Federal Revenue Sharing regulations. Also under Article XIIIB
of the State Constitution, they had to have a separate consideration of the
appropriations limit which was tentatively scheduled for June 9, 1981.
Further, they had set up two workshops including all Department Weads to be
conducted from 9:30 a.m. through the lunch hour, on each of the days indi-
cated, May 19 and June 9, 1981.
Finance Director C~orge Ferrone then explained the new method of financing
previously outlined by Mr. Talley, the Certificates of Participation, at the
request of Councilwoman Maywood (see his memorandum dated April 22, 1981 to
the City Manager--subject: Lease Purchase Financing Using Certificates of
Participation, along with attachments under title sheet, Installment Sale
Financing--on file in the City Clerk's office).
In closing and after questions posed by Council Members to staff on various
aspects of several department budgets, Mayor Seymour stated it was obvious
that the City Manager and Department Weads had been "knee deep" in the budget
process. Me believed this was the first year they had received the document
as early as they had. It was good to know they had a balanced budget, but on
the other hand, he was certain the Council was going to want to scrutinize
rather closely the expenditure side being proposed and particularly the
revenue side which indicated some increases in funding from the citizenry. On
behalf of the Council, he commended the work that had been done to date, and
they looked forward to more in-depth sessions in which there could be give and
take from the Council.
81-636
City Wall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 9:30 A.M.
The Mayor continued that, relative to the proposed hearing schedule, he would
like to get into the budget sessions as quickly as possible in order to have
more time for deliberations. We questioned the possibility of adding an
additional session on May 12, lqS1.
After a discussion between Council and staff on the proposed hearings, the
following schedule was set for budget work sessions: lO:O0 a.m.--May 12,
1981: and 9:30 a.m--May 19 and June 9, 1981.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to adjourn. Councilman Bay seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (12:17 P.M.)
~BERTS, CITY CLERK
81-637
City Hall, Anaheim, .California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
WATER ENGINEERING MANAGER: Ray Auerbach
Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Steve Isenman, Youth Director, Anaheim United Methodist Church,
gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Don R. Roth led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Seymour
and authorized by the City Council:
(a) "Respect for Law Week in Anaheim" - May 3-9, 1981
(b) "Cultural Arts Month" in Anaheim - May 1981
(c) "Parliamentary Law Month" in Anaheim - May 1981
(d) "Hire a Veteran Week" in Anaheim - May 3-9, 1981
(e) "Older Americans Month" - May 1981
(f) "Tourism Month" in Anaheim - May 1981
The following people accepted the above listed proclamations: (a) Dean Stockwell;
(b) Eileen Anthony, Marguerite Lee, Betty Lillis; (c) Marie Karcher; (d) Rodney
Harford; (e) Rose Wilson; (f) Bill Snyder.
119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A resolution of congratulations was unan-
imously adopted by the City Council, extending congratulations and best wishes
tO every citizen in the new City of Uraysu, Japan, the third city in the world
to be a home for Dimneyland, to be premented by Mr. Dick Nunnim of Dimneyland
on his forthcoming trip to Japan.
119: RESOLUTION OF APPRECIATION: A resolution of appreciation was unanimously
adopted by the City Council expressing appreciatio~ to Dr. Tso-Hwa Lee, Professor,
Geography Department, California State University at Fullerton, and his students:
Lisa Watson, Lisa Blow, Carol Gomez, Julia Kling, Alena Jensen, Steve Wood,
Dennis Azevedo and Jerry Ditucci for their dedication and volunteer assimtance
in helping improve the fire dispatch system and remapping of the City.
81-638
City Hall~ Anaheim,, California .- COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
139: LEGISLATION REMOVING RESTRICTIONS AND PROHIBITIONS ON THE USE OF NATURAL
GAS IN UTILITY POWERPLANTS: Mr. Bob Burbank, Southern California Edison, first
introduced Mr. Norman DeVilbiss, who would be replacing him as the Company's
representative in the area. Mr. Robert Perry from the Southern California Gas
Company was also present in the Chamber audience; both Mr. Burbank and Mr.
Perry were prepared to answer any questions of the Council on the proposed
legislation.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 81R-193 for adoption, supporting legisla-
tion to remove the restrictions and prohibitions on the use of natural gas in
utility powerplants. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-193: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
IN SUPPORT OF LEGISLATION REMOVING THE RESTRICTIONS AND PROHIBITIONS ON THE USE
OF NATURAL GAS IN UTILITY POWERPLANTS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour.
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 81R-193 duly passed and adopted.
MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the adjourned
regular meeting of February 18, 1981, subject to typographical corrections.
Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda, after
reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to waiver is
hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the title, specific
request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution
in regular order. Councilman Overholt ~econded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $2,167,016.03, in accordance
with the 1980-81 Budget, were approved.
160: PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - SINGLE PHASE SUBMERSIBLE-TYPE TRANSFORMERS - BID
NO. 3755: On motion by Councilwoman Kay-wood, seconded by Councilman Overholt,
the low bid of Westin§houme Electric Corporation was accepted and purchase
authorized in the amount of $12,236.64, including tax, as recommended by the
Purchasing Agent in his memorandum dated April 22, 1981. MOTION CARRIED.
160: PURCHASE OF .EQUIPMENT - DUCTILE IRON PIPE - BID NO. 3759: On motion by
Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Bay, the low bid of Pacific States Cast
Iron Pipe was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $12,159.22,
including tax, as recommended by the Purchasing Agent in him memorandum dated
April 21, 1981. MOTION CARRIED.
123/150: CINCO DE MAYO FIESTA AGREEMENT AND CARNIVAL: On motion by Councilman
Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, an agreement was authorized with the
Anaheim Cinco De Mayo Committee by which the City agreed to pay a sum not to
81-639
City Hall~ Anaheim, Califor.nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
exceed $1,500 for community entertainment in connection with the Cinco de Mayo
Fiesta to be held at La Palma Park from April 30 through May 3, 1981, as rec-
ommended in memorandum dated April 22, 1981 from Deputy City Manager James
Ruth. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilwoman Kay-wood, seconded by Councilman Overholt, an agree-
ment was authorized with Robert H. Cohn, dba Bobby Cohn and Associates, to
conduct a carnival in conjunction with the Cinco de Mayo Fiemta being held
April 30 through May 3, 1981, as recommended in memorandum dated April 22,
1981 from the Deputy City Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
103: JEFFERSON-ORANGETHORPE NO. 2 ANNEXATION: Councilman Bay offered Resolution
No. 81R-194 for adoption, initiating annexation proceedings for Jefferson-Orange-
thorpe No. 2 annexation and setting June 9, 1981, at 3:00 p.m., as the date and
time of the public hearing for the proposed annexation, pursuant to Section
35220 of the Government Code of the State of California, am recommended in
memorandum from Robert Kelly, Associate Planner. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-194: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CI.TY OF ANAHEIM
INITIATING ANNEXATION PROCEEDINGS FOR JEFFERSON-ORANGETHORPE NO. 2 ANNEXATION TO
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND FIXING A TIME, DATE AND PLACE OF HEARING ON SAID PROPOSED
ANNEXATION PURSUANT TO SECTION 35220 OF THE GOVERNMENT CODE OF THE STATE OF
CALIFORNIA.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 81R-194 duly passed and adopted.
169: AWARD OF CONTRACT - CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL POLE FOUNDATIONS: Account No.
55-668-6329-80580-36400. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 81R-195
for adoption, awarding a contract as recommended by the City Engineer in his
memorandum dated April 21, 1981. Refer ~o Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-195: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE
BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PI~NT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIP-
MENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND
PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPROVEMENT: CONSTRUCTION OF STEEL POLE FOUNDATION ALONG MIRALOMA WAY AND
AVENUE IN THE VICINITY OF ORANGE FREEWAY (ROUTE 57), IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
ACCOUNT NO. 55-668-6329-80580-36400. (Owl Crane and Rigging, $21,230)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 81R-195 duly passed and adopted.
81-640
City Hall~ Anah.ei~, .California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
123: AGREEMENT WITH PROTECTION ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES: On motion by Council-
man Overholt, seconded by Councilman Bay, an agreement was authorized with
Protection Engineering Associates, in an amount not to exceed $8,500, for
engineering and inspection services relating to the recoating of the Burruel
Reservoir, located near the Olive Hills Reservoir, southerly of Nohl Ranch
Road, as recommended in memorandum dated April 21, 1981 from Public Utilities
General Manager Gordon Hoyt. MOTION CARRIED.
175: A SECOND AMENDMENT TO DIEMER INTERTIE AGREEMENT: On motion by Councilman
Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour, a letter agreement was authorized concerning
clarification of the Second Amendment to the Diemer Intertie Agreement relating
to distribution of funds and/or capacity, and authorizing the General Manager
and City Clerk to execute same, as recommended in memorandum dated April 21, 1981
from the Public Utilities General Manager. MOTION CARRIED.
123/180: RENEWAL OF INSURANCE BROKER CONTRACT - MARSH & MCLENNAN: On motion
by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the first amendment to
the agreement with Marsh & McLennan was authorized, to provide professional
insurance brokerage services as recommended in memorandum dated April 22, 1981
from Risk Manager Jack Love. MOTION CARRIED.
123: CITY TREASURER RECRUITMENT: City Manager William Talley briefed the Council
on memorandum dated April 24, 1981 recommending that the Council approve a letter
agreement with Ralph Andersen & Associates for recruitment of a City Treasurer in
the amount of $7,000 and authorizing the City Manager to execute same and trans-
ferring said $7,000 from the Council Contingency Fund into Program 154.
Mayor Seymour asked if there had been interest earnings in excess of the budget
in the subject Program; Mr. Talley confirmed that was correct. The Mayor then
stated he felt it was appropriate, to the degree logically possible, that they
assign expenses to the departments incurring them.
Mr. Talley stated if the Council wished, they could adopt a motion increasing
the budget in that fund by $7,000 and directing him to take those funds from
the interest earnings.
Councilman Roth moved to authorize that a letter agreement with Ralph Andersen
& Associates for the recruitment of a City Treasurer in the amount of $7,000
and authorizing the City Manager to execute same, with the funds to be appro-
priated from interest earnings in excess of budget in the subject Program.
Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
123: FIRST AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR LEGAL SERVICES - OLIVER, STOEVER &
LASKIN: Councilman Overholt moved to authorize a first amendment to the
agreement with Oliver, Stoever & Laskin for legal services, as recommended
in memorandum dated March 23, 1981 from the City Attorney. Councilman
Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
127: SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION, TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1981: Councilman Roth
offered Resolution No. 81R-196 for adoption, establishing voting precincts and
polling places, appointing precinct board members and fixing compensation therefor
for the Special Municipal Election of said City to be held Tuesday, June 2, 1981,
heretofore called by Resolution No. 81R-138 of the City Council. Refer to
Resolution Book.
81-641
City ~all, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-196: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
CALIFORNIA, ESTABLISHING VOTING PRECINCTS AND POLLING PLACES, APPOINTING PRECINCT
BOARD MEMBERS AND FIXING COMPENSATION FOR THE SPECIAL MUNICIPAL ELECTION OF SAID
CITY OF TUESDAY, JUNE 2, 1981, HERETOFORE CALLED BY RESOLUTION NO. 81R-138 OF THE
CITY COUNCIL.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 81R-196 duly passed and adopted.
105: REQUEST FOR JOINT MEETING - CITY COUNCIL/LIBRARY BOARD: Request by Elizabeth
Schultz, Vice Chairperson of the Library Board, for a joint meeting with the
Council for the purpose of making their recommendations with respect to the
annual budget and to discuss matters relating to the Canyon Hills LSbrary, as
outlined in memorandum dated April 27, 1981.
After a brief Council discussion relative to the subject request, by general
consent the Council agreed to meet with the Library Board on Tuesday, May 5,
1981, at i1:00 a.m., in the ground floor Training Room of the Civic Center.
162: FOURTH ANNUAL BENEFIT TRAIL RIDE AND HIKE: Request by Cecilia Kellar
and Linda Bedford of the Riding and Hiking Trail Committee, in letter dated
April 7, 1981, for endorsement and sponsorship of the Fourth Annual Benefit
Trail Ride and Hike to be held Sunday, May 3, 1981, was submitted.
On motion by Councilman Overholt, seconded by Councilman Bay, the subject request
for endorsement and sponsorship was approved. MOTION CARRIED.
150: REQUEST FOR USE OF GLOVER STADIUM BY THE CENTRAL BAPTIST CHURCH: Jim
Redden, Minister of Music for Central Baptist Church, requesting the use of
Glover Stadium in La Palma Park for a Celebration Service honoring the Church's
25th Anniversary.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked if anything political was~involved in the requemt.
Jim Redden, Minister of Music, answered "no". It was strictly a religious
service celebrating their 25th anniversary.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the request for
the use of Glover Stadium in La Palma Park on October 4, 1981, for a celebra-
tion service honoring ~.he Church's 25th Anniversary was approved. MOTION CARRIED.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman
Kaywood, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and
recommendations furnished each Council M~mber and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda:
1. 118: CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred
to the City's Claims Administrator and the Application For Leave to Present
Late Claim was denied:
81-642
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
a. Claim submitted by Mrs. Maxine Dodd for personal injury damages purportedly
sustained as a result of fall on step between an Anaheim Stadium exit and the
parking lot, on or about October 26, 1980.
b. Claim submitted by Roger McLellan for personal injury and vehicular damages
purportedly sustained as a result of accident on Convention Center parking lot
due to unsafe condition, on or about January 22, 1981.
c. Claim submitted by William C. Milo for personal property damages purportedly
sustained as a result of unmarked obstruction on La Palma Avenue near State
College Boulevard, on or about April 3, 1981.
d. Claim submitted by Charlene Pagay for vehicular damages purportedly sustained
as a result of an unmarked obstruction in northbound Imperial Highway by Canyon
High School, on or about April 2, 1981.
e. Claim submitted by Steve and Nona Pyles for vehicular damages purportedly
sustained when a tree branch fell from parkway tree onto vehicle pavked across
the street from 321 North Claudina, on or about April 5, 1981.
f. Claim submitted by Betty Jo Garcia for personal injury damages purportedly
sustained as a result of accident caused by obstruction in roadway without
adequate warning, southbound Haster Street north of Katella Avenue, on or about
January 30, 1981.
g. Claim submitted by Bob L. and Betty L. Watson for damages purportedly sus-
tained at 719 S. Citron Street as a result of sewage back-up and overflow during
sewer cleaning operations, on or about February 5, 1981.
h. Claim submitted by Guy E. Winters for damages purportedly sustained as a
result of power failure at 6436 Via Corral, on or about February 13, 1981.
i. Application To File Late Claim and claim submitted by Gilbert Nunez Moya
for personal injury damages purportedly sustained as a result of contact with
dangerous substance during towing operations at an accident involving power
pole damage in the vicinity of Orangewood Avenue and Mallul Drive, on or about
August 13, 1980.
2. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. 175: Public Utilities Department, Customer Service Division--Monthly Report
for March 1981.
b. 105: Anaheim Public Library--Minutes of March 18, 1981.
c. 140: Anaheim Public Library--Monthly statistical Report for March 1981.
d. 105: Corm~unity Redevelopment Commission--Minutes of March 18, Marmh 25
and April 8, 1981.
e. 173: Before the Public Utilities Commission, Application of Orange Coast
Sightseeing Company, a corporation, for authority to establish a Los Angeles
City tour and to establish tours from a new service area in the vicinity of
Los Angeles International Airport.
City Hall, Anahei. m.~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
f. 175: Before the Public Utilities Commission, Application No. 60446, in
the matter of the application of Southern California Gas Company for authority
to implement a Residential Conservation Service (RCS) Program and to increase
rates to recover the first year's cost of the Program, and to include the RCS
~Program costs in the Conservation Cost Adjustment procedure.
g. 175: Before the Public Utilities Commission, Application No. 60447, in
the matter of the application of Southern California Gas Company for authority
to implement a Zero Interest Weatherization Financing and Credits Program and
to increase rates to recover the first year's cost of the Program, and to
include the Weatherization Program costs in the Conservation Cost Adjustment
Procedure.
h. 105: Public Utilities Board--Minutes of April 16, 1981.
3. 108: APPLICATIONS: The following applications were approved in accordance
with the recommendations of the Chief of Police:
a. Public Dance Permit: Tommie Ray Productions, for a public dance to be held
June 26, 1981, 6:00 p.m. to 12:00 Midnight, at the Disneyland Hotel, 1150 West
Cerritos Avenue. (Tommie Ramos, applicant)
b. Public Dance Permit: Empresa Frias, for a public dance to be held May 9,
1981, 6:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m., at ~he Anaheim Convention Center. (Cruz Munoz
Frias, applicant)
c. Dinner Dancing Place Permit: Sugarplums, 801 East Katella Avenue, for
dancing seven days a wekk, 8:00 p.m. to 1:30 a.m. (Clark Edward Hills, appli-
cant)
d. Amusement Devices Permit: Jax Donut House, 3414 West Ball Road, for 1
Asteroid machine. (Bun Tao, applicant)
e. Amusement Devices Permit: R. Co. Arcade, 918 South Magnolia Avenue, Suite
G, for various amusement devices. (Jim R. Rodig and Ervin L. Rodig, applicant)
MOTION CARRIED.
158: DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Bay offered Resolution Nos. 81R-197 through
81R-199, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-197: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Loara Street Partnership;
Arnold Feuerstein, et al.; Rafael Fernandez, et ux.; Ralph M. Young, et al.)
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-198: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DEDICATING CERTAIN CITY-OWNED PROPERTY IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR CERTAIN PUBLIC
PURPOSES. (R/W #2800-29)
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-199: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY
FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (R/W #2800-40)
81-644
City Hall~ .Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 81R-197 through 81R-199, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City Planning
Commission at their meeting held April 6, 1981, pertaining to the following
applications, as listed on the Consent Calendar, were submitted for City Council
information.
1. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 80-81-29 AND VARIANCE NO. 3206 (TENTATIVE TRACT NO.
11466): Submitted by Edward A. and Cheryl Padilla, for a change in zone from
RS-A-43,000 to RM-3000, to establish a 1-lot, 33-unit condominium subdivision
on property located at 1803 South Ninth Street, with various Code waivers.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-75 and 76, granted
Reclassification No. 80-81-29 and Variance No. 3206 (Tentative Tract No. 11466),
and granted a negative declaration status.
2. VARIANCE NO. 3207: Submitted by Larry R. Smith, to establish a 3-lot sub-
division on C1 zoned property located north and west of the northwest corner
of Ball Road and Knott Street, with a Code waiver of required lot frontage.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-74, granted Variance
No. 3207, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical exemption determination.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2183: Submitted by Grace Chapel of South Gate,
to permit a private school in an existing church on RM-1200 zoned property
located at 325 West Broadway, with various Code waivers.
Conditional Use Permit No. 2183 was withdrawn by the petitioner and a negative
declaration status was granted.
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2189: Submitted by Alan Segal, et al, to permit
on-sale beer and wine in an existing restaurant on CL zoned property located at
2222 West Orange Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-68, granted Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 2189, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical
exemption determination.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2190: Submitted by Homer D. and Dorothy D. Wilburn,
to permit on-sale beer and wine in a proposed restaurant on CL zoned property
located at 1675 West Katella Avenue, with a Code waiver of minimum number of
parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-69, granted Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 2190, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical
exemption determination.
81-645
CitZ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2191: Submitted by Texaco, Inc., to construct
an outdoor ski slope on CL zoned property located at 1001 North Harbor Boule-
vard, with a Code waiver of maximum fence height.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-70, granted Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 2191, and granter a negative declaration status.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2192: Submitted by Larry R. Smith, to permit a
racquetball facility on CL zoned property located north and west of the north-
west corner of Ball Road and Knott Street, with a Code waiver of minimum number
of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-73, granted Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 2192, and granted a negative declaration status.
8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2193: Submitted by Kwanghoon and Ocksum'Chang,
to permit on-sale beer and wine in a proposed restaurant on CL zoned property
located at 821-B North Euclid Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-71, g~anted Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 2193, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical
exemption determination.
9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2194: Submitted by Anaheim West Center, Ltd.,
to permit a cocktail lounge on CL zoned property located at 3156½ and 3158
West Lincoln Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC81-72, granted Con-
ditional Use Permit No. 2194, and granted a negative declaration status.
10. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1812 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Donald L.
Shafer, requesting an extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 1812, to
permit a cocktail lounge and dance hall on RM-1200 zoned property located at
1203 West Lincoln Avenue.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Conditional Use
Permit No. 1812, to expire April 10, 1982.
11. VARIANCE NO. 2694 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Howard Farrand, re-
questing an extension of time to Variance No. 2694, to permit the outdoor
storage of shipping containers on ML zoned property located at 518-526 South
Rose Avenue.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Variance No.
2694, to expire April 28, 1983.
12. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 79-80-32 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Richard E.
Huston, for a change in zone from CG and RS-7200 to the CO zone, for property
located on the west side of Harbor Boulevard, north of Romneya Drive.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Reclassification
No. 79-80-32, to expire March 24, 1982.
81-646
CitM. Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
13. VARIANCE NO. 2349 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1408 - EXTENSIONS OF TIME:
Submitted by David S. Collins, requesting extensions of time to Variance No. 2349
and Conditional Use Permit No. 1408, to establish a center for the sale of hand-
crafted art objects and related merchandise with food sales and to establish a
billboard exceeding the allowable area at other than an authorized location, on
ML zoned property located at 1514 West Broadway and also an area of land located
at the southwest corner of Broadway and Adams Street.
The City Planning Commission granted extensions of time to Variance No. 2349
and Conditional Use Permit No. 1408 to expire May 28, 198'3.
14. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2031 - REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: Submitted by
Gerald Albright, requesting termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 2031, to
permit an auto body and upholstery shop and office use of a residential struc-
ture on ML zoned property located at 225 Euclid Way.
The City Planning Commission, purmuant to Resolution No. PC81-77, terminated
Conditional Use Permit No. 2031.
No action was taken on the foregoing items, therefore the actions o~ the City
Planning Commission became final.
142/115: ORDINANCE NO. 4221: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4221 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4221: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14,
CHAPTER 14.28 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 14.28.050
RELATING TO BICYCLES, SKATEBOARDS, TOY VEHICLES IN ANAHEIM CIVIC CENTER PARKING
STRUCTURE.
Roi1 Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4221 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 4222: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4222 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4222: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (78-79-5(2), RS-HS-10,000)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4222 duly passed and adopted.
81-647
City Hall, ~n~.eim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 4223: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 4223 for first
reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4223: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (64-65-14(3), CG)
139: CALIFORNIA INHERITANCE TAX AND FEDERAL ESTATE TAX: Councilman Overholt
noted that the resolution from Garden Grove taking a position against the
California Inheritance Tax and now against the Federal Estate Tax was coming
through again. They had corrected the resolution now to read that the Federal
Estate Tax constituted 1% of the total taxes collected by the Federal Govern-
ment as opposed to the former, whereas, where it stated, "that the monies
raised by the Federal Estate Tax do not cover the cost of the Federal Govern-
ment in collecting the tax," which he would suggest was inaccurate. In the
event the Council was interested in taking a position on the California Inheri-
tance Tax and Federal Estate Tax, he would be supportive of a position in
opposition to both taxes and would be glad to work with the City Attorney pre-
paring a resolution that was accurate. President Reagan, prior to being elected
as he understood, took a position against continuation of the Federal Estate
Tax.
Mayor Seymour stated he felt Councilman Overholt's suggestion to be an excellent
idea unless there was some objection and after having worked with the City
Attorney to correct the inaccuracy, that the resolution be brought back for
approval.
163: SCHOOL RESOURCE PROGRAM: Councilman Overholt stated it was interesting
to note that the Corresponding Secretary of the Benito Juarez School PTA com-
plimented Officer Phil Tuttle, the Community Resource Officer at their school
as part of the Enhancement Program of the Police Department in the area of
Crime Prevention.
Mayor Seymour stated he wished to share with the Council on that same point,
that they had been receiving a flood of mail on the same subject. He suspected
the message being conveyed, in deliberating the budget, that they leave the
School Resource Program alone.
Councilman Overholt stated he felt they were all totally supportive of the
impact of that program on crime prevention.
123: APPOINTMENT OF INTERIM TREASURER: Mayor Seymour recounted that last week
he suggested in their recruitment for a City Treasurer that they consider ex-
tending a contract with the current City Treasurer. The City Attorney had pre-
pared a resolution, as well as a contractual agreement and unless there was an
objection, he asked that those be brought forth to the Council for considera-
tion on next Tuesday, May 5, 1981.
144: CONSIDERATION OF REPLACEMENT OF A REPRESENTATIVE ON THE ORANGE COUNTY
TRANSIT DISTRICT (OCTD) AND ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT COMMISSION (OCTC): Mayor
Seymour referred to the notification received from Mr. A1 Hollinden stating
that he was resigning from the OCTD and OCTC. That being the case and since
81-648
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - April 28, 1981, 1:30 P.M.
Anaheim had a vital interest in transportation, he (Seymour) encouraged each
Council Member to give consideration as to who they might consider supporting
as a replacement for Mr. Hollinden including any member of the City Council who
might be interested in serving.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: The City Manager requested a closed session to dis-
cuss a personnel matter and potential litigation with no action anticipated;
the City Attorney requested a closed session to discuss litigation and poten-
tial litigation with no action anticipated.
Councilwoman Kaywood moved ~o recess into Closed Session. Councilman Bay
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (2:25 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (3:40 P.M.)
170: PUBLIC HEARING - WAIVER OF HILLSIDE GRADING ORDINANCE, TENTATIVE TRACT
NO. 10984: Application by Kaufman & Broad Homes, Inc., requesting a waiver of
the requirement of ~he Hillside Grading Ordinance as it relates to the location
of side lot lines at the top of slopes within Tract No. 10984 located south of
Santa Ana Canyon Road, both east and west of Weir Canyon Road.
Approval of the subject waiver was recommended by the City Planning Commission
at their March 23, 1981 meeting, as well as the City Engineer in his memorandum
dated March 18, 1981.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak to the subject request.
Mr. Jim Ko, Kaufman & Broad, stated he was present to answer any questions.
Councilwoman Kaywood referred to letter dated April 23, 1981 received from Mr.
Gordon A. Anderson, Environmental Specialist of the California Regional Water
Quality Control Board stating that it appeared the proposed waiver might ad-
versely impact water quality due to resultant erosion with possible siltation
of the Santa Ana River. She asked Mr. Ko to respond.
Mr. Ko answered that he believed the writer of the letter did not understand
wha~ they were trying to do. The proposed waiver would have no impact whatso-
ever and had nothing to do with erosion.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, the Mayor closed the public
hearing.
MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved ~o approve the waiver of the Hillside Grading
Ordinance as it related to the locating of side lot linem at the top of slopes
within Tract No. 10984 as recommended by the City Planning Commission and the
City Engineer. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Seymour moved to adjourn to Tuesday, May 5, 1981 at
11:00 a.m. in the Civic Center ground floor Training Room for a joint meeting
with the Library Board. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
(3:43 P.M.)
~BERT~
, CITY CLERK