Loading...
1980/01/1580-39 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - January 15~ 1980, 11:00 A.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt (arrived 11:30 A.M.), Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: William T. Hopkins CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Leonora Sohl Mayor Seymour called the adjourned regular meeting to order at 11:00 a.m. for the purpose of interviewing candidates for appointment to the Youth Commission. The following candidates were introduced to the Council. Informal discussions lasting approximately 15 minutes were held with each candidate during which the Council Members reviewed such subjects as: reasons for wanting to serve on the Youth Commission; amount of time the youth will have to devote to this activity; their ideas for new programs or projects the Youth Commission might implement; their opinions as to the most important contributions the Youth Con, mission might make; drug use and education at the junior and senior high leval; the goals which the Youth Commission should consider setting for the coming year. DeAnn Cavenne, Western High School David DesRoches, Loara High School Beth Fujishige, Loara High School Rebecca A. Swett, Canyon High School Nancy K. Bounds, Cal State, Fullerton Bruce Underwood, Loara High School Susan Chen, Canyon High School In addition, Council Members requested that past members seeking reappoint- ment summarize what they felt were the most significant achievements of the Youth Commission and their reasons for wishing to continue service with this Stoup. During this portion of the interview, Nancy K. Bounds, currently Chairman, indicated her desire to return for service for only one year to permit her to guide projects initiated to completion. RECESS: At the conclusion of the interviews, by general consent, the Council recessed for 5 minutes. (12:50 p.m.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order, all Council members being present. (12:55 p.m.) 80-40 City Hall, Anaheim, California - MINUTES ADJOURNED REGULAR MEETING - January 15~ 1980~ 11:00 A.M. Mayor Seymour called for nominations, indicating that after all nominations were made for the five appointed positions, he would then ask for a roll call vote on each. Councilman Overholt nominated Beth Fujishige. Councilwoman Kaywood nominated Bruce Underwood. Councilman Roth nominated David DesRoches. Councilman Bay nominated Nancy Bounds. Mayor Seymour nominated DeAnn Cavenee Councilwoman Kaywood nominated Rebecca Swett On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the nominations were closed. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Seymour requested a roll call vote on each of the nominations made, which were taken as follows: Nomination of Beth Fujishige for appointment to the Youth Commission, term expiring December 31, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None None None Nomination of Bruce Underwood for appointment to the Youth Commission, term ex- piring December 31, 1981. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Roth and Seymour NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bay ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Nomination of David DesRoches for appointment to the Youth Commission, term ex- piring December 31, 1981. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None Nomination of Nancy K. Bounds for appointment to the Youth Commission, term ex- piring December 31, 1981. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Roth and Seymour ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 80-41 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - MINUTES Ap, JOURNED REGULAR MEETING - January 15~ 1980~ 11:00 A.M. Nomination of DeAnn Cavenee for appointment to the Youth Commission, term ex- piring December 31, 1981. AYES: NOES: ABSTAINED: ABSENT: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None None None Nomination of Rebecca Swett for appointment to the Youth Commission, term ex- piring December 31, 1981. AYES: Overholt, Kaywood, Roth and Seymour NOES: Bay ABSTAINED: None ABSENT: None Mayor Seymour declared the appointments of Beth Fujishige, Bruce Underwood, David DesRoches, DeAnn Cavenne and Rebecca Swett made to the Youth Commission and requested the City Clerk to so notify these candidates. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Bay moved to adjourn. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 1:00 P.M. LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK LEONORA SOHL, DEPUTY CITY CLE~ 80-43 City .Hall~ Ana~eim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 198.0~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESET: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour COUNCIL MEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts PURCHASING AGENT: Richard Jefferis CITY ENGINEER: William Devitt Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. INVOCATION: Reverend Terry Hutchinson, Melodyland Hotline Center, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ben Bay led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 119: RESOLUTION: A resolution was unanimously adopted by the City Council supporting the California Crime Watch and the Attorney General's "Plan to Restore Public Safety in the 80's". Police Chief George Tielsch stated at the end of the first quarter of 1979, they found that Anaheim had a 15% increase in Part I crimes, more serious crimes. As the Council may have read in the newspaper recently, at the end of the third quarter that rise had been reduced to 12%, and at the end of December, it was found to be 9.8%. It was nothing to be happy about, but in view of those decreases, he felt they were doing something that was right. Another area on which he was pleased to report was the fact that crimes against persons had remained relatively steady or when they had increased, it was at a percentage lower than the rest of the nation was experiencing. They were find- ing that crimes against property were the biggest problem they were facing. Some of the reasons for the increase were as follows: the business community was becoming increasingly upset about the problems of shoplifting. They were increasing their surveillance and making many more arrests, whereas many of the crimes went unknown in the past thus causing the figures to rise significantly. Another problem was the fact that with so many visitors to the City who rented cars, when they were not returned to the auto rental agency, the Anaheim Police Department took the theft report. They wanted to reverse the trend, but he felt the public should know that Anaheim was a very safe City in which to live and visit, and they would be working hard during 1980. He was aware that the Council's wish would be to reverse that trend and to see a minus, rather than a plus, and he concurred. Chief Tielsch then stated that since the press was present, one of the reasons for having the resolution was to inform the public of some of the services provided by the Police Department. Since they were not being met with loud 80-44 City. Hall~ Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. enthusiasm, he emphasized that he wanted the community to know of those services which were available through the Community Services Unit in the Police Department. They would be more than happy to assist in hardening the target against the criminal. Mayor Seymour expressed his concern over the FBI's statistics revealed in the recent newspaper article indicating a rise in crime within Anaheim. As the Chief reported, although he has tr~mmed back from 15% to 9.8% in the fourth quarter, it was far too much an increase in crime. Even worse was that the - increase in crime against property had risen equal to, or in excess of, the rate of inflation. It was a compounding situation each year reflecting an additional increase in the rate of crime. The increase in crime against property had risen to the point where it required local bodies, specifically the City Council, to take extreme measures to insure that the continued rate of increase was leveled out and turned around. In the last budget session, the Council committed to an additional expenditure of $550,000 to recruit another 10 police officers, and they were in the process of coming on-line. He did not think that was enough and that they had to take an even stronger stand if they intended to alter the trend that had been continuing for many years. The Mayor emphasized that he was suggesting that Chief Tielsch and the City Manager be prepared in this year's budget to bring in a budget that would demonstrate an effectiveness in grasping the statistics and applying the proper resources, personnel and equipment to achieve an objective of leveling out those crime rates, so that in the coming fiscal year, they would see a zero percentage increase, especially in crimes against property. He wanted to be part of the City Council who in ensuing years would be able to say, in Anaheim they held the line even though there was an increase in other cities. The Council was going to have to act positively relative to the Chief's recommen- dations, as well as the City Manager, on what it was going to take to accomplish what he articulated. Chief Tielsch thanked the Council for their support and the support they had given in the past. Councilman Roth stated that he shared the Mayor's concern on the issue. He referred to the time where the law said, "use a gun - go to jail" which since had been deteriorated by court actions. He reported that last week Assemblyman Ross Johnson conducted hearings on assembly bills, one of which was, "Rob a Home - Go to Jail." He was very supportive of such a bill. Sometimes lenient judges permitted people who committed those crimes to be back on the street rapidly. He asked that the Chief review tha~ bill with the possibility of the Council endorsing it or supporting it. Chief Tielsch stated that he supported that bill as President of the California Police Chief's Association, and he wrote a letter indicating his support. He concurred with Councilman Roth and would be more than happy to submit something for Council consideration. 119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A resolution of congratulations was unan- imously adopted by the Council to be presented to Stanley J. Pawlowski as he is honored as recipient of the "Spirit of Life" award from the City of Hope. 8O-45 City Hall~ Anahe,im~ Ca, lifornia - C0UNC.I.L MINUTES - January 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held August 21 and August 28, 1979. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Roth moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolution on the Agenda, after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to the waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the title, specfic request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution in regular order. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $7,016,551.22, in accordance with the 1979-80 Budget, were approved. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL MOTION CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the following actions were authorized as recom- mended by the Purchasing Agent: a. !50: B~d No. 3573 - High Pressure Respirable Air Compressor System for Fire Department breathing apparatus - award to Halprin Supply Company, $32,245.20. b. 160: Bid No. 3601 - One Truck-mounted Air Compressor Emulsion Unit with related equipment - awarded to Wolfe & Son's Sales Company, $11,175.58. c.' 160: Bid No. 3602 - Four cab and chassis vehicles - award to International Harvester Co., $55,239.93. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT - ONE CAB/CHASSIS - BID NO. 3603: Councilman Bay noted that the Purchasing Agent's memorandum of January 1, 1980 stated that three companies when the Purchasing Agent checked with them as to why they did not respond to the bid solicitation indicated they did not receive the bid request. If they were getting that kind of response, he suggested the possibility of sending requests for bids by registered and return receipt mail to preclude such occurrences. Richard Jefferis, Purchasing Agent, stated what they proposed doing was to call the companies the day the request for bids was mailed so that those companies involved would know that they were in the mail, and also to get the name of the person with whom they spoke. If that did not work and they did not get a better response, then they would do what Councilman Bay suggested. Councilwoman Kaywood suggested if they did so, that the documentation be sent via certified mail instead of registered, because it was approximately one-half the cost. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the low bid of International Harvester Co. was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $15,660.78, including tax, as recommended by the Purchasing Agent in his memo- randum dated January 9, 1980. MOTION CARRIED. 80-46 City Hall, Anaheim~ ~alifornia .-. COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15, 1980~ 1:30 P.M. 174: HELP ELIMINATE RAPE EVERYWHERE (HERE) PROJECT: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 80R-14 for adoption, as recommended in memorandum dated January 9, 1980 from Deputy City Manager James Ruth, authorizing an agreement with Inner-Lock, Inc., to administer the Help Eliminate Rape Everywhere project, term ending July 31, 1980. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 80R-14: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH INNER-LOCK, INC., AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 80R-14 duly passed and adopted. 121: SANITARY SEWER EASEMENT - OWENS DRIVE AND THE NORTH END OF DANIELLE CIRCLE: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, February 5, 1980 at 3:00 p.m. was the date and time set for a hearing to consider the acquisition, via Eminent Domain, of a sanitary sewer easement across a parcel of land between Owens Drive and the north end of Danielle Circle, Rolf and Heide Marie Krumes, owners; and directing the City Attorney to prepare and mail notification therefor. MOTION CARRIED. 164: PROJECT ALPHA PHASE I - LEMON STREET STORM DRAIN REVISION AND CHANGE ORDER: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour, revisions to the Lemon Street Storm Drain between Cypress Street and "New" Lincoln Avenue, were approved, and authorizing approval of a Change Order in the amount of $85,792.95, as recommended in memorandum dated January 9, 1980 from the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. 116: CHARTER MEMBERSHIP IN THE TECHNOLOGY GROUP OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY~ INTERNATIONAL, INC.: City Manager William Talley briefed the Council on his memorandum dated January 8, 1980, recommending City membership in the subject group. MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to authorize City membership in the Technology Group of Science and Technology, International, Inc. Councilwoman Kmywood seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, City Manager Talley clarified for Councilwoman Kaywood that if representatives were sent on annual international product evaluation trips (see page 9, Group of 50) that cost would come out of the $3,000 per year dues. Councilwoman Kaywood then stated she was very pleased with and excited about the whole concept and the idea of being able to reach out and use the best of what other cities and private industries had devised. To know that it was ongoing would also encourage that concept. 80-47 City Hall~ An~. hetm~' California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980~ ,1:30 P.M. Councilman Roth was pleased over the fact that the City did not have a long-term commitment and if, for example, after a year the program did not materialize as expected, they would not be obligated to continue in it. Councilman Overholt noted in the letter of invitation that Anaheim was being asked to sit on the Board. He wanted to know if they were taking action on that now or merely voting to Join. Mr. Talley stated that the invitation came out of the fact that Anaheim was the Chairman of the group that attended the General Motors presentation. He assumed if the Council authorized participation, that the City would receive an invitation to sit on the Board, and he would expect that part of the participation would be to accept such an assignment. Councilman Bay stated that when viewing the matter from the standpoint of dollars and "sense", Anaheim would find itself in a lead position and the more apt to get paid for some of its ideas than they would apt to be paying for other ideas. Projecting the program, he did not believe that it was going to cost the City anything, plus the fact that there would be what he called cross-pollination between cities across the nation. A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. MOTION CARRIED. 123: ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Council- woman Kaywood, an agreement with the County of Orange, to extend the term of the September 21, 1976 agreement for complete animal control services, commencing July 1, 1980 and terminating June 30, 1981, was approved as recommended in memo- randum dated January 8, 1980 from the City Manager's office. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Kaywood then referred to the forms now available in the City for barking dog complaints. She felt that what Anaheim had done ought to be passed along to the County, which might save time relative to personnel working with people on filling out the form. There was a form explaining what was required, rather than Just a blank form, and it would preclude the necessity of having a person available to explain how it should be filled out. City Attorney Hopkins stated that he would pass that information on to the County. 123: LEGAL SERVICES - OLIVER~ STOEVER & LASKIN: On motion by Councilman Overholt, seconded by Councilman Bay, an agreement with Oliver, Stoever & Laskin for legal services performed on behalf of the City of Anaheim, was approved as recommended in memorandum dated January 8, 1980 from the City Attorney. MOTION CARRIED. 105: APPOINTMENT TO THE COMMUNITY CENTER AUTHORITY: Mayor Seymour asked that the subject appointment be continued in order to give more time to consider the applications received. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, consideration of appointment to the Community Center Authority was continued one week. MOTION CARRIED. 80-48 C.ity Hall~ Anaheim.~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Janaury 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. 105: HONORARY CHAIRMAN - YOUTH COMMISSION: Mayor Seymour suggested that it might be in order to offer a motion appointing Nancy Bounds as Honorary Chairman of the Youth Commission. Councilwoman Kaywood moved to appoint Miss Nancy Bounds Honorary Chairman of the Youth Commission. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, the Mayor asked the City Attorney, if the motion carried, as he understood, it would not be necessary to amend the ordinance or by-laws of the Youth Commission; City Attorney Hopkins answered it would not be necessary in the case of an Honorary Chairman. Councilwoman Kaywood explained the Youth Commission by-laws contained a statement that the Chairman would automatically be reappointed and that was in conflict with the ordinance. Mr. Hopkins stated that the by-laws would have to be amended to conform with th ordinance, but that would not affect Nancy Bounds. He also noted that the City Clerk indicated that a time limit should be placed on the Honorary Chairmanship. Councilwoman Kaywood thereupon included a one-year time limit in her motion. She also asked that letters be sent to the two remaining candidates who were not appointed to the Youth Commission asking that they consider participating on one of the committees. A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion with the one-year stipulation included. MOTION CARRIED. 119: CO-SPONSORSHIP OF GERONTOLOGICAL RECEPTION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved that the City co-sponsor the February 7, 1980 "Senior Day" reception as requested by Peggy Weatherspoon, Gerontologist, to be held at the Brookhurst Community Center in conjunction with the Western Gerontological Society's 26th Annual Meeting, including waiver of fees, as recommended in memorandum dated January 11, 1980 from the Deputy City Manager James Ruth. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 149: PERMISSIONT0 PARK A MOTOR HOME AT 2001 EAST KAT~LLAAVENUE: Request by Mr. Lonnie G~ Gerard of Gerard's Union 76, for permission to park a motor home on a lot at 2001 East Katella Avenue (continued from the meeting of January §~ 1980), wa~ ~uhm{teed. The Mayor asked if Mr. Gerard was present; there was no response. The matter was then continued for consideration at the end of the remaining agenda items. Later in the meeting, City Clerk Linda Roberts announced that an oral communi- cation was received that Mr. Gerard could not be present, but that the Council should make a decision without his being present. Councilwoman Kaywood moved to deny the request in accordance with the recommen- dations contained in staff report dated January 2, 1980. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Councilman Overholt stated that he felt the Council should hear what Mr. Gerard had to say. 80-49 City ~all~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January. 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. MOTION: Councilman Overholt moved to continue consideration of thesubject request one week. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Kaywood asked that this be the last continuance. She noted that the request was for a dual use not permitted anywhere else in the City, and she did not want it allowed through continuances. 134: AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79R-705: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 80R-15 for adoption amending Resolution No. 79R-705, nunc pro tunc, to correct Condition No. 2 of Variance No. 3115. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 80R-15: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 79R-705, NUNC PRO TUNC. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Ruth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 80R-15 duly passed and adopted. 134: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 156: On motion by Councilman Ruth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, February 5, 1980 at 3:00 P.M., was the date and time set for a public hearing on General Plan Amendment No. 156. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. 118: CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to the City's Claims Administrator: a. Claim submitted by Garfield C. Jones for personal injury damages purportedly sustained as a result of improperly painted road markings and inadequate street lighting and suitable pedestrian crossing signals, in the vicinity of Broadway at its intersection with Lemon Street, on or about November 16, 1979. b. Claim submitted by James Edward Smith, II, for damages purportedly sustained as a result of false arrest and false imprisonment on or about October 6, 1979. c. Claim submitted by Eugene M. Testi for vehicular damages purportedly sustained as a result of accident at the Loara Dump, Loara and Catalpa Avenue, when claimant's vehicle was hit by City truck on or about October 10, 1979. d. Claim submitted by Harry James Larsen for vehicular damages purportedly sustained as a result of accident at Broadway and Anaheim Boulevard involving City-oWned vehicle, Unit No. 1107, on or about December 20, 1979. 80-50 City.. ~all~ Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. e. Claim submitted by Leslie M. Baldauf for damages purportedly sustained as a result of electrical problem caused by trouble in the wire between the utility pole and the dwelling, on or about December 14, 1979. f. Claim submitted by Debra Ellen Burkhardt for personal injury damages purpor- tedly sustained as a result of improperly maintained cement pylons at the Anaheim Stadium parking lot, on or about October 5, 1979. g. Claim submitted by David F. Jensen, Satellite Markets, for damage to compressor purportedly sustained as a result of high voltage after power failure, on or about September 16, 1979. h. Claim submitted by Gary Cleaveland for property damage purportedly sustained as a result of accident involving City-owned equipment (mower threw rock through window) at 6294 Camino Manzano, on or about December 27, 1979. i. Claim submitted by Thomas Gibney for damages purportedly sustained as a result of power failure, causing loss of refrigerated and frozen food, on or about December 22, 1979. j. Claim submitted by Jose Loui Reynaga Guerrero for damages purportedly sus- tained as a result of actions by Anaheim Police causing loss of property, on or about November 17, 1979. k. Claim submitted by Adolph Macias for damages purportedly sustained as a result of loss of electrical service to claimant's place of business, on or about December 31, 1979. The following Application for Leave to Present Late Claim was denied: 1. Application to present Late Claim by Jeanette R. McCurdy for personal injury damages purportedly sustained as a result of actions by public employees at Thomas Edison School, on or about December 23, 1978. The following claim was allowed: m. Claim submitted by Robert J. McCartney for vehicular damages purportedly sustained as a result of accident involving City-owned vehicle on or about November 8, 1979. 2. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filedi a. 107: Public Works Department, Building Division - Monthly Report for December 1979. b. 175: Public Utilities Commission, Application No. 58764, Southern California Edison Company, for authority to modify its Energy Cost Adjustment Clause to increase its Energy Cost Adjustment Billing Factors. (Modification of Decision No. 90967) c. 107: Public Works Department, Building Division - Annual report for 1979. 80-51 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. 3. 108: DINNER DANCING PLACE PERMIT: The Dinner Dancing Place Permit application submitted by Daniel Lee Daugherty for Stuart Anderson's Black Angus, 2101E. La Palma Avenue, for dancing seven days a week from 8:30 p.m. to 2:00 a.m., was approved in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police. 4. 161: DOWNTOWN PROJECT ALPHA - PHASE ~ CHANGE ORDER NO. 1: Said Change Order No. 1 in the amount of $30,005.36 was approved, as recommended by the City Engineer, bringing the original contract price to $7,977,820.25; Steiny and Company, Inc., contractor. MOTION CARRIED. 108: AMUSEMENT DEVICE PERMIT - 2522 W~ST LINCOLN: Application by Margaret Jane Neel for Supercade at 2522 West Lincoln Avenue for various amusement devices, was submitted. City Clerk Roberts announced that a Mr. Hinch requested to address the Council regarding the subject application. Mr. Vernon Hinch, 2918 Rogers Court, stated that he operated a small gift shop in the shopping center where the Supercade was proposed. He did not object to the Supercade because it offered entertainment to young people, but to the disruption that such businesses caused in shopping centers and also the exces- sively loud noise levels. Also, there was a condition existing in the center of which the Council was perhaps not aware. A massage parlor was operating there at the present time not licensed as such, but their advertising stated that it was such a business. He thereupon submitted newspaper advertisements to the Council which he believed indicated that they were in violation of their license; Mayor Seymour stated that they would investigate the matter immedi- ately. Mr. Hinch then explained for Councilman Roth that he had the same landlord as the person who was requesting the Amusement Device Permit and although he attempted to do so, the landlord would not speak to him. They did have a lease for the center which specified that there would be no coin-operated devices permitted. Councilman Roth felt that the situation was then a civil matter between Mr. Hinch and his landlord; Mr. Hinch agreed and stated he was pursuing that course. Mayor Seymour stated as he understood, Mr. Hinch's primary objections were noise and, the traffic it would bring into the shopping center; Mr. Hinch also added, the influence that young people would be exposed to. The Mayor asked if he would feel differently if the massage parlor were not there. Mr. Hinch stated he would probably still object, but he would not have as good grounds to do so. Councilman Overholt asked if the shopping center was near a public school; Mr. Hinch answered it was near Savanna High School, but more than 1,000 feet away. He also stated that the massage parlor came into the center about five months ago. 80-52 City Hall, Anahe.im~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. Mayor Seymour stated he did not want to deprive the Supercade from opening in that location and he did not see a conflict with the schools and the distance from it. However, he did see a great conflict if, in fact, there was the type of business in that shopping center as pictured in the advertisements presented. If they approved the permit for Supercade knowing the other business was estab- lished in the same center, they would be contributing to an immoral environment for young people. MOTION: On that basis and that basis only, Councilman Seymour thereupon moved that the Amusement Devices Permit be denied. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, the Mayor explained that if it were not for the envi- ronment, he could not oppose the location of that type of activity in the center. Councilman Roth stated that he would have to oppose the motion since the Supercade was being used as a "whipping boy" because of the massage parlor. The Council should not be against a person who was living within the ordinance. As well, the Chief of Police recommended approval. If anything were done, it should be done to the massage parlor. The Mayor stated they have a restriction in the City that a pinball operation must not be located any closer than 600 feet from a high school. The reason for it was that they did not want young people to be attracted to that type of use when they should be attracted to school. That shopping center would not be a proper environment for such a business. Councilman Roth then stated that they should do something about the environment; the Mayor agreed and added that he would then be happy to entertain the request for an Amusement Devices Permit, but not until that time. Councilman Roth contended that they were not giving the applicant "his time in court." They should continue the matter and have a hearing with the applicant present and also to convince the landlord to get rid of the massage parlor. The Mayor stated that was the intent of his motion to deny, because of its close proximity to the massage studio. Councilman Bay asked if he did not feel he would obtain the same result by continuing the application for the permit and that it would be considered or delayed until they found out what could be done about the massage parlor. Mayor Seymour felt that anyone could understand clearly the intent of the motion. Councilman Roth asked if it could be ascertained by the City Attorney that the person did not have a license for a massage parlor and to have the Police dispatch to abate the use that afternoon. City Attorney Hopkins stated he would have to check to see if a permit had been issued for a massage studio and, if not, the Police could then take proper action, 80-53 City Ha.ll~... Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15.~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. City Clerk Roberts then clarified for Councilman Overholt that no fee had been paid by the applicant at the time the application for an Amusement Device Permit was filed. A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion of denial. Councilman Roth voted "no". MOTION CARRIED. 108: PUBLIC DANCE HALL PERMIT - JEZEBEL'S: Application by Jeffrey C. LeBrun for Jezebel's, 125 North State College Boulevard, for dancing seven days a week from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Mayor Seymour stated he removed the item from the Consent Calendar to give some background on Jezebel's. The last time he had checked, they had continuing complaints in and around the residential neighborhood because of overflow parking and noise. He was not opposed to approving the permit which represented an increase of the activity if the parking and noise situation had been resolved. If not, he would be opposed to extending the use already creating a problem for that neighborhood. Miss Santalahti stated she would have to check with the Police Department. Zoning had not received any complaints on the establishment for the last year or so. MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved to continue consideration of the above application for a Public Dance Hall Permit for one week, with a report to be submitted from the Planning Department and the Police Department. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood stated she seconded the motion because they did have many problems in the past. Further, they were now requesting dancing from 10:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m. Councilman Roth noted when complaints were received in the past, there was a vacant lot to the north which was now occupied by Wendy's,va parking lot and a fence which acted as a buffer and seemed to help the situation considerably. The Mayor stated the complaints he received were east of State College Boulevard, as well as west of the subject property, but he had not received any in the last six months. A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. MOTION CARRIED. 108: AMUSEMENT DEVICE PERMIT - 884 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE: Application by Robert Harlan Jackson, 884 West Lincoln Avenue, for various amusement devices. Mr. Norman Johnson, 7339 Sandalwood Drive, real estate broker, explained that the new permit application was for Mr. Harlan Jackson, an Anaheim resident, who was in the process of purchasing the Anaheim Fun Center located across the street from Anaheim High School. The center was presently owned by two gentlemen who owned other centers in the San Fernando Valley, and they lived in Sun Valley and Burbank. He emphasized that Mr. Jackson lived in Anaheim and his father owned two private schools in the City. Mr. Jackson's wife was a teacher in the ele- mentary school system, and Mr. Jackson had a business that would allow him the 80-54 City Hall; Anah~im~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980, 1:30 P.M. time to operate the Fun Center in the afternoons and evenings to give it the proper supervision. The one problem was that it was located within 600 feet of the high school and the Police Chief, therefore, had to deny their permit. However, in talking with the Police Department, he was assured that there were no problems and the only reason for denial was because of the 600-foot stipulation. The Fun Center had been in operation for two years; it was presently operating and it had a permit. They were seeking to change the permit from the present owners over to Mr. Jackson. He asked if they were approaching the situation properly due to the fact that the establishment already had a permit and if instead, he should be asking for a waiver. City Attorney William Hopkins stated that it was a change in ownership and would require a new permit to be issued to the new owner and therefore, compliance with the Code would be required. They recently approved a waiver provision for that particular Code section that would be in effect on February 8, 1980. It was stipulated that letters from the affected local school district would be desirable in order to assist the Council in making a decision on a waiver. Mr. Johnson stated unfortunately the Principal at Anaheim High School was out of town until Friday. They talked to the Assistant Principals who indicated that the Fun Center had opened up at noon time and sometimes earlier. Mr. Jackson did coordinate with them on the hours that the Center would be open so they would not conflict with school hours. One of the Assistant Principals went to the Center one day to pick up a couple of students and the young man who was running the establishment at the time, not the owners, chased him out. Those were situations they hoped to rectify and with Mr. Jackson on the premises to supervise, those problems should not occur. The advantage was to get the Center out of absentee ownership and into local ownership by a responsible person. Councilman Overholt stated they had an ordinance presently in effect prohibiting them from approving such a center within 600 feet of school property. They had also enacted an amendment which would be in effect February 8, 1980 permitting them to waive the restriction, provided the affected school district approved it. It seemed it was merely a matter of the applicant obtaining approval from the Anaheim Union High School District in the form of a letter. He then asked if the present ordinance was in existence when the present Fun Center was established. City Attorney Hopkins stated he would have to check the dates to determine when the original was put into effect. The 600-foot stipulation went into effect in 1958. Councilman Overholt suspected that the Fun Center did not apply for a permit and was probably in violation. Mr. Johnson stated that he had seen the permit, not a business license, but a permit for the amusement devices. Somehow they obtained the permit and were allowed to operate and at the time, the Police Department did not say "no". Councilman Overholt stated there had been other problems that had come to the attention of the Council such as the use of profane language by the management and they were concerned that the environment should be a good one. If the applicant obtained a letter from the Anaheim Union High School District approving of the activity, the Council would then be disposed to use the waiver provision. 80-55 City H~ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - J~nuary 15. m. 1980~ 1:30 P.M. Mayor Seymour suggested that they continue consideration of the application until February 8, 1980 and at the same time provide Mr. Johnson the opportunity to seek an approval from the administration of the school district. Mr. Johnson expressed his concern the sellers might withdraw the business from sale. If Mr. Jackson could not obtain a permit quickly, the present owners would continue operating the center themselves. MOTION: Councilman Seymour moved to continue consideration of the application for an Amusement Devices Permit to February 12, 1980, during which time the applicant would seek the approval of the Principal of Anaheim High School. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution Nos. 80R-16 through 80R-20, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 80R-16: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Orange County Water District; Marriott Corporation, two deeds; John Schmidt; Robert P. Warmington; The Roman Catholic Bishop of Orange; Southern Pacific Transportation Co. ) 169: RESOLUTION NO. 80R-17: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: WINSTON ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT, W/O SUNKIST, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 47-792- 6325-2510; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IM- PROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 14, 1980 at 2:00 P.M.) 169: RESOLUTION NO. 80R-18: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: WEST STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, W/S FROM SOUTH STREET TO HAMPSHIRE STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 47-792-6325-2560; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS, AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPEC- IFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 14, 1980 at 2:00 P.M.) 169: RESOLUTION'NO. 80R'19: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER,~ FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: NOHL RANCH ROAD STREET IM- PROVEMENTS - PHASE II, IMPERIAL HIGHWAY TO NOHL CANYON ROAD, ACCOUNT NOS. 13- 792-6325-2130, 13-794-6325-4090, 01-794-6325-4090, A.H.F.P. NOS. 908 AND 909; MEATS AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT, S/O NOHL RANCH ROAD, ACCOUNT NO. 13-792-6325- 2150, A.H.F.P. NO. 846, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Griffith Company) 80-56 City Hall~. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 80R-20: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TERMINATING ALL PROCEEDINGS IN CONNECTION WITH VARIANCE NO. 918 AND DECLARING A PORTION OF RESOLUTION NO. 4416 NULL AND VOID. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 80R-16 through 80R-20, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 170: FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 8905: Developer, Community Planning and Development, Inc.;. tract is located easterly of Anaheim Hills Road and southerly of Via Montanera and contains 25 RM-4000 proposed zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the proposed subdivision, together with its design and improvement, was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council approved Final Map Tract No. 8905 as recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum dated January 17, 1980. Councilman Seymour abstained. MOTION CARRIED. Mayor Seymour explained his abstention was due to the fact that his home was adjacent to the property. 170: FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 10254: Developer, Classic Development; tract is located northerly of Santa Aha Canyon Road at Eucalyptus Drive and contains 15 RS-7200 proposed zoned lots. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the proposed subdivision, together with its design and improvement, was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council approved Final Map Tract No. 10254 as recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum dated January 14, 1980. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 4093: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4093 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4093: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (78-79-44, CO) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4093 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 4094 AND 4095: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 4094 and 4095 for first reading. 80-57 City _Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January .15~ 1980~ 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 4094: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61(95), ORDINANCE NO. 4095: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (71-72-23(1), CL) 114: COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATORS ASSOCIATION: Councilman Overholt reported on the meeting he attended Wednesday, January 9, 1980 with City Manager Talley in Sacramento of the newly formed Community Redevelopment Administrators Association. Of great concern in Orange County amongst the thirteen or fourteen cities where Redevelopment programs were in progress or contemplated, was Proposition 4, the Gann Initiative, which could have a devastating impact on those programs. The Association formed a group to go to Sacramento to talk to Orange County legislators about that impact and what could be done and also to try to get an expression from them as to their support or lack of it for remedial legislation to make it perfectly clear that Redevelopment was not contemplated to be affected under Propostion 4 or, if so, to what extent. Thirteen cities were represented either by elected officials or staff and in some cases by both. He chaired the two-and-a-half hour meeting which resulted in illuminating and constructive discussions. It was fair to state the legi- slators in attendance pledged their cooperation to assist in promoting remedial legislation to clarify the meaning of Proposition 4. It was his understanding that it was not to apply to Redevelopment. They were interested in seeing what the California Association of Realtors and California Taxpayers Association were going to do as to their position on the effect of Proposition 4 on Redevelopment, as well as the California State Chamber of Commerce. It was important for Anaheim to know if its program of Redevelopment wae going to be impeded, if not shut down. It was something to take into account now and not later. Mr. Larry Sierk, Executive Vice President of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce stated that he spoke with John Hay yesterday, Head of the California State Chamber of Commerce who was also very active in the California Taxpayers group. He (Hay) stated that, in his opinion, redevelopment agencies were going to be protected and they were not out to get "those kinds of groups." The main impetus was to get the "fat" out of the bureaucracy. Caltax and the California State Chamber of Commerce were scheduling a meeting at the end of January or early February in Sacramento on that particular subject so that Redevelopment agencies could be protected. He (Sierk) suggested to Mr. Hay that Anaheim be invited and particularly Norm Priest. 114: PRESIDENT OF THE CALIFORNIA ASSOCIATION OF REALTORS: Councilman Overholt congratulated and saluted Mayor Seymour on his installation as President of the California Association of Realtors. It was a high honor for the Mayor and for the City. Mayor Seymour thanked those who attended the installation which was held in Los Angeles. He accepted the congratulations, but questioned whether he was being placed in a political corner relative to Proposition 4. He assured the Council that he would come to the right decision for the California Association of Realtors, as well as his responsibility in the office of Mayor. 80-58 City Hall~ A~.aheim~ C~lifor.nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15, 1980, 1:30 P.M. 114: LEAGUE OF CITIES MEETING - JANUARY 10p 1980: Councilwoman Kaywood reported on her attendance at the subject meeting which was held at Anaheim Stadium where Los Angeles Mayor Tom Bradley, President of the California League of Cities, was the main speaker. An item of lengthy discussion was grocery item pricing and she and Councilman Roth agreed to vote with the majority to continue the matter for one month. A gentlemen from Ralphs Market was present and distributed extensive data on the subject. She obtained three packets for those Council Members who wanted to review the material so that they would be prepared to vote on the issue at the February 14, 1980 League of Cities meeting. The stores were trying to cut costs and they did not want government involvement intruding on another industry. On the other hand, the people least able to afford the extra pennies were the ones who would not be able to check items easily if individual items were not marked. Councilman Roth noted that the Council had received a request from a citizen who was interested in speaking to the Council regarding unit pricing. Ne suggested when they did so that they also invite a representative from Ralphs to express his views accordingly. Mayor Seymour asked why the issue was of concern to a local City Council. Councilman Roth thereupon explained how the matter came about which was basically due to the fact that Ralphs Market was using the scanner method of check-out, without unit pricing. Consumer groups expressed their concerns and Orange County Supervisor Harriet Wieder presented the matter to the Board who subsequently adopted an ordinance for the unincorporated County area preventing Ralph's from going to that procedure. A citizen request was then received asking the same for Anaheim. He (Roth) received the call and suggested that the gentleman contact the City Clerk as to the best method of expressing his views, and he was subsequently scheduled to be heard at a forthcoming public meeting. Councilwoman Kaywood felt it incumbent upon the Council to hear citizen input on the matter. RECESS: By general consent the Council recessed for 15 minutes. (3:00 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (3:15 P.M.) 149/161: PUBLIC HEARING - PARKING'METER REINSTALLATION ALONG LINCOLN AVENUE BETWEEN ANAHEIM BOULEVARDANDMELROSE STREET: Public Works Department to consider the reinstallationof parking meters or an alternate method for limited parking time restrictions along Lincoln Avenue between Anaheim Boulevard and Melrose Street. A report from the City Engineer dated January 11, 1980 was submitted recommending approval of the use of one-hour parking signs in lieu of parking meters. The Mayor asked if any member of the public was present to speak either in favor or in opposition to the subject or if anyone wished to give input; there being no response, he closed the public hearing. - 80-59 City Ha~ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 15~ 1980, 1:30 P.M. MOTION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved that the use of one-hour parking signs in lieu of parking meters be approved along Lincoln Avenue between Anaheim Boulevard and Melrose Street, as recommended in report dated January 11, 1980 from the City Engineer. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Before concluding, Councilman Roth stated he felt there was a misunderstanding as to who could utilize the new parking structure behind City Hall and that it was by permit only. He suggested the possibility of placing a sign on the corner of Philadelphia Street and Lincoln Avenue indicating that there was free parking to the public in the parking structure. A sign would also be appropriate at the rear street entrance to the structure giving the same information. He believed that would take the pressure off the limited parking situation on Lincoln Avenue. Traffic Engineer Paul Singer pointed out that there was a public parking sign at that location; Councilman Roth was aware of it, but main- tained that a sign clearly indicating free parking was necessary. By general consent, the staff was instructed to install signs at the front street entrance (Philadelphia Street) and rear street entrance to the parking structure indicating free parking in that structure. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess into Executive Session. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:20 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (3:34 P.M.) 123/112: SAM D. BATTISTONE~ CARLA NAN BATTISTONE AND SUN FOOTBALL~ INC.: Council- man Seymour offered Resolution No. 80R-21 for adoption approving a settlement agreement and release with Sam D. Battistone, Carla Nan Battistone and Sun Football, Inc., in connection with San Bernardino County Superior Court Action No. 178254. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 80R-21: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT AND RELEASE WITH SAM D. BATTISTONE, CARLA NAN BATTISTONE AND SUN FOOTBALL, INC. IN CONNECTION WITH SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ACTION NO. 178254. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 80R-21 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Roth moved to adjourn. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 3:35 P.M.