Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC 2014/11/03
City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, November 3, 2014 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairman: John Seymour • Chairman Pro-Tempore: Michelle Lieberman • Commissioners: Peter Agarwal, Paul Bostwick, Mitchell Caldwell, Bill Dalati, Victoria Ramirez • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Consent Calendar • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, October 30, 2014, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 11/03/14 Page 2 of 7 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments: This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 11/03/14 Page 3 of 7 Consent Calendar: The items on the Consent Calendar will be acted on by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Planning Commission, staff, or the public request the item to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Reports and Recommendations ITEM NO. 1A VARIANCE NO. 2006-04687B (DEV2014-00103) Location: 531 and 533 South West Street Request: The applicant requests review of final elevations for a previously-approved two-lot single-family residential subdivision. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether a previously approved Negative Declaration is appropriate to serve as the environmental impact determination for this request per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Motion Project Planner: Joseph Wright jwright@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3843 VARIANCE NO. 2012-04893 (DEV2011-00109A) Location: 2600 West Lincoln Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval of a retroactive one-year extension of time to comply with conditions of approval related to the expansion of an existing automobile repair facility. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Motion Project Planner: Elaine Thienprasiddhi ethien@anaheim.net 11/03/14 Page 4 of 7 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 VARIANCE NO. 2014-04964 (DEV2014-00031) Location: 3085 East La Palma Avenue Request: To allow two business identification signs at an existing service station where one business identification sign is permitted. Continued from the September 8, 2014 and October 6, 2014 Planning Commission meetings. Request for Withdrawal Project Planner: Amy Vazquez avazquez@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT NO. 2012-00558A (DEV2010-00043B) Location: 2626 East Katella Avenue Request: To amend the previously-approved Coordinated Sign Program for the ARTIC Project, to include two double-sided and one single-sided off-site advertising signs. The proposed amendments would 1) replace two previously-approved double-sided 19’ 6” wide by 7’ tall business identification monument signs on Katella Avenue and Douglass Road with one double- sided up to 14.5’ wide and up to 35’ foot tall and one single-sided up to 14.5’ wide and up to 35’ foot tall business identification monument signs (that include approximately10’-2” wide x 18’-6” foot tall digital billboard faces to be used for off-site advertising purposes; and 2) add an approximately 84’ tall double- sided v-shaped digital billboard with 48’ wide x 14’ tall digital sign faces to be used for off-site advertising purposes near State Route 57. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action was adequately analyzed by Previously-Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 2010-00343 and the Previously-Approved Addendum. Motion Project Planner: Susan Kim skim@anaheim.net 11/03/14 Page 5 of 7 ITEM NO. 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05739 (DEV2014-00054) Location: 2095 East Katella Avenue Request: To permit a church within a commercial building at a retail and office center. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Elaine Thienprasiddhi ethien@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2014-147 (DEV2014-00060) Location: 3321 – 3325 East La Palma Avenue Request: To establish a 5-lot industrial subdivision. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether Environmental Impact Report No. 317 (Previously-Certified) is the appropriate environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: David See dsee@anaheim.net 11/03/14 Page 6 of 7 ITEM NO. 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05760 (DEV2014-00094) Location: 2420 East Katella Avenue Request: To permit the sale and consumption of beer and wine at a pastry shop. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Amy Vazquez avazquez@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05702 VARIANCE NO. 2014-04989 (DEV2013-00103) Location: 1220 South Brookhurst Street Request: To permit the expansion of an existing indoor smoking lounge and to permit and retain an outdoor smoking lounge with fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Vanessa Norwood vnorwood@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, November 17, 2014 at 5:00 p.m. 11/03/14 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 4:45 p.m. October 29, 2014 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. ITEM NO. 1-A PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2006-04687B – REVIEW OF FINAL BUILDING ELEVATION PLANS FOR TWO SINGLE-FAMILY RESIDENCES LOCATION: 531 and 533 South West Street APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Eugene Levert and the agent/designer is Brian Oslin. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of revised elevations for a previously approved two lot single-family residential development. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, determine that the previously-approved Negative Declaration serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and approve revised final elevations for two residences. BACKGROUND: The property is a vacant remnant parcel created from the widening of the I-5 (Santa Ana) Freeway and is zoned RS-2 (Single-Family Residential). The General Plan designates the property for Low Density Residential land uses. Properties located to the north and east are developed with single-family residences and the I-5 Freeway is located southwest of the property. The western boundary of the Anaheim Colony Historic District is located to the east of the property, across West Street. Reclassification No. 2006-00177, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2006-127 and Variance No. 2006-04687 were approved by the Planning Commission on May 31, 2006. Those applications included requests to rezone the property from the T (Transition) zone to the RS-2 (Single-Family Residential) zone; to create a two-lot subdivision; and a variance to allow a reduced lot depth. Resolution No. PC2006-49, approving Variance No. 2006-04687, includes the following condition of approval: 3. That final building elevation plans incorporating recommendations from the Neighborhood Preservation Office shall be submitted to the Planning Services Division for review and approval by the Planning Commission as a Reports and Recommendation item.” On October 30, 2006, final elevations and landscape plans were presented to the Planning Commission for review and approval as a Reports and Recommendation item. The plans were approved and are included as Attachment 3 to this staff report. Although building elevation plans are not typically tied to subdivision requests, this development 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net RS-2VACANT RM-4APTS8 DU RS-2SFRRS-2VACANTRS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SFRRS-2SINGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCEIINDUSTRIAL TVACANTRS-2VACANT RS-2VACANTRS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-3SI NGLE FAMI LYRESI DENCERS-2VACANT RM-4APTS10 DU RM-4APTS15 DU RS-2SIN GLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S-2 SIN G L E F A M IL Y R E SID E N C E RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCERS-2SI NGLE FAMI LY RESI DENCE5 F R E E W A Y 5 F R E E W A Y S M A NCHESTER AVE S I LLI NOI S STS WEST STW S A N T A A N A S T S I NDI ANA STW W A T E R S T S H A ZEL W O O D ST S PEPPER STW FA Y L N W ELDERWOOD AVE S BOXWOOD STW V IN E Y A R D A V E W. BALL RDS. EUCLID STW. BROADWAY S. WALNUT STW. LINCOLN AVE E . B R O A D W A YE.L IN C OLN AV ES. HARBOR BLVDS. ANAHEI M BLVDW .LINC O L N A V E S. HARBOR BLVDS. HARBOR BLVD5 3 1 & 533 South West Street D EV No. 2 0 14-00103 Subject Property APN: 036-091-23 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 13 5 F R E E W A Y 5 F R E E W A Y S M A N C H E S T E R A V E S ILL INO IS STS WEST ST W SANTA ANA ST S IND IANA ST W WATER ST S H A Z E L W O O D S T S PEPPER STW F A Y L N W ELDERWOOD AVE S BOXWOOD STW VINEYARD AV E W. BALL RDS. EUCLID STW. BROADWAY S. WALNUT STW. LINCOLN AVE E. BROAD W A Y E .L I N COLN AV ES. HARBOR BLVDS. ANAHEIM BLVD W .LINC O L N A V E S. HARBOR BLVDS. HARBOR BLVD 531 & 533 South West Street DEV No. 2014-00103 Subject Property APN: 036-091-23 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2013 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Page 1 of 3 Property to the north of the project site (525 S. West Street) Property to the northeast of the project site (530 & 536 S. West Street) ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Page 2 of 3 Property to the southeast of the project site (542 S. West Street) Property to the south of the project site (I-5 Freeway and S. West Street) ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Page 3 of 3 Property to the west of the project site (I-5 Freeway -- project site in the foreground) ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Elevations approved by the Planning Commission on October 30, 2006 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 1-B PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3843 AND VARIANCE NO. 2012-04893 – REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME LOCATION: 2600 West Lincoln Avenue (Wheel Service Texaco) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Shakour Cyrus. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a retroactive one-year extension of time to comply with conditions of approval related to the expansion of an existing automobile repair facility. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, determine that a Class 1 Categorical Exemption is the appropriate environmental determination for this request and approve a one-year extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 3843 and Variance No. 2012-04893. BACKGROUND: This 0.33-acre property is currently developed with an automotive repair facility and is located in the General Commercial (C-G) zone. The General Plan designates this property for General Commercial land uses and all adjacent uses are commercial. Conditional Use Permit No. 3843 was approved by the Planning Commission in 1996. This permit allowed automotive sales and vehicle repair with sales of parts to occur on this site. A modification to this permit to allow an expansion of the building was approved by the Planning Commission in April 2012. This approval included a variance from the minimum landscape setback requirements. DISCUSSION: The Zoning Code requires land use entitlements to be exercised within two years of approval. Requests for extensions of time may be granted in two, one-year increments. The applicant has submitted a request for a retroactive one-year time extension that would keep the entitlement active until April 23, 2015. An additional one year extension of time may be requested if the entitlement is not enacted by April 23, 2015. According to the applicant, the project has been delayed due to economic factors. Code Enforcement Division staff conducted an inspection of the property on October 27, 2014, and found no code violations. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3843E AND VARIANCE NO. 2012-04893 November 3, 2014 Page 2 of 2 Since approval of this permit, there have been no changes to the surrounding neighborhood or project description that would affect any of the findings that the Commission made in support of the project. Staff recommends approval of a one-year retroactive extension of time to expire on April 23, 2015. Prepared by, Submitted by, Elaine Thienprasiddhi Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Letter of Request The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 3. Photographs 4. Prior Planning Commission Staff Report 5. Prior Planning Commission Resolution 6. Code Enforcement Division Memorandum TCRESTMOTEL RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE O.C.F.C.D. RM-4CONDOMINIUMS64 DU RM-4CHATEAU LOIREAPARTMENTS72 DU RM-4SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE O.C.F.C.D. RM-4PALM WESTAPARTMENTS18 DU RM-4LINCOLN PARKAPARTMENTS63 DU RM-4LINCOLN COURTAPARTMENTS32 DU RM-4CASA SERENAAPARTMENTS140 DU C-GMEDICALOFFICE RM-4LINCOLN PINESAPARTMENTS34 DU RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4FAIRWAY VILLAGEAPARTMENTS145 DU C-GVALENCIA INNRM-4VILLA SERRANOAPARTMENTS117 DU RM-4AGATE MANORAPARTMENTS18 DU RM-4VILLA PACIFICAAPARTMENTS40 DU C-GLINCOLNRV PARK C-GRETAIL RM-2CONDOMINIUM/TOWNHOUSE95 DU C-GAUTO REPAIR/SERVICE C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL RM-2CONDOMINIUM/TOWNHOUSE95 DU RM-2CONDOS12 DU RM-4MAGNOLIAAPARTMENTS26 DU RM-4WINDSONGAPARTMENTS24 DU C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL C-GRETAIL TAUTO REPAIR/SERVICE W L I N CO L N AV E S MAGNOLIA AVEN MAGNOLIA AVEW LINCOLN AV EN NEW LIFE WAYW. LINCOLN AVE W. BROADWAY W. CRESCENT AVE W. ORANGE AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVES. BROOKHURST STN. BROOKHURST ST. CRESCENT AVE S. BEACH BLVDW. LINCOLN AVE 2 6 0 0 West L incoln A venue D EV No. 2 0 11-00109 A Subject Property APN: 126-032-09 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 13 W LINCOLN AVE S MAGNOLIA AVEN MAGNOLIA AVEW LINCOLN AVEN NEW LIFE WAYN NEW LIFE WAY W. LINCOLN AVE W. BROADWAY W. CRESCENT AVE W. ORANGE AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVES. BROOKHURST STN. BROOKHURST ST. CRESCENT AVE S. BEACH BLVDW. LINCOLN AVE 2600 West Lincoln Avenue DEV No. 2011-00109A Subject Property APN: 126-032-09 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2013 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 M E M O R A N D U M CITY OF ANAHEIM Code Enforcement Division DATE: OCTOBER 27, 2014 TO: ELAINE THIENPRASIDDHI, ASSOCIATE PLANNER FROM: JESSE BECERRA, CODE ENFORCEMENT OFFICER SUBJECT: COMPLIANCE INSPECTION FOR CUP3843/RESOLUTION PC2012-027 WHEEL SERVICE TEXACO 2600 W. LINCOLN AVENUE ANAHEIM, CA 92804 The subject property was inspected on 10/27/2014. Conditions of approval #1-3, 5-8 are currently in compliance. Conditions of approval #4 & 9 are not applicable. Building Permit 2010-03811 issued on 10/26/2010 for a tenant improvement consisting of the construction of a non-bearing wall partition to separate service bay 3 has expired. The construction did not occur. If you have any further questions regarding the property, please feel free to contact me at ext. 4478. Thank you. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2014-04964 LOCATION: 3085 East La Palma Avenue (Chevron Service Station) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Joseph Karaki of Western States Engineering, Inc. and the property owner is Michael Kurkgian. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a variance to allow two freestanding signs at an existing service station where one freestanding sign is permitted by the Zoning Code. DISCUSSION: This hearing was continued from the September 8th and October 6th Planning Commission meetings. The applicant has submitted a request to withdraw this application and intends to submit revised plans for a triangular monument sign that would comply with the Code. Although no Planning Commission action is required for withdrawn applications, public hearing notices for this project were mailed to property owners within 300 feet of the project. Therefore, this report was included on the Commission agenda for public information purposes. Prepared by, Submitted by, Amy Vazquez Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner, Lilley Planning Group Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Applicant’s Request for Withdrawal 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net S P 9 4 -1 D A 5 S E R V IC E S T A T IO N S P 9 4 -1 D A 5 S E R V IC E S T A T IO N S P 9 4 -1 D A 5 V A C A N T S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 O F F IC E S S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 B U S IN E S S P A R K SP 9 4-1DA3SUBSTATION S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 R E T A IL S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 B U S IN E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 2 K R A E M E R B U S IN E S S C E N T E R S P 9 4 -1 D A 5 S T E R L IN G B U S IN E S S C O M P L E X S P 9 4 -1 D A 5 C A R L S J R D A 5 O .C .F .C .D .S P 9 4 -1 D A 5 B U S IN E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 B U S IN E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 5 S E R V IC E S T A T IO N S P 9 4 -1 D A 2 K R A E M E R B U S IN E S S C E N T E R S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 L A P A L M A - K R A E M E R B U S IN E S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 IN D U S T R IA L SP 94-1DA1INDUSTRIAL S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 B U S IN E S S P A R K E L A P A LM A A V EN KRAEMER BL VDN KRAEMER PL N ARMANDO STE . M IR A L O M A A V E E . L A P A L M A A V E N. T U STIN A VEN.BLUEGU M S TN. MI LLER STN. RIO VISTA ST308 5 Ea st La Palm a Ave nu e D E V N o . 20 1 4-0 0 03 1 Su bje ct Property APN: 344-361-04 ATTACHM ENT NO. 1 0 50 10 0 Feet Ae ria l Pho to :Ma y 20 13 E LA P A LM A A V EN KRAEMER BL VDN KRAEMER PL N ARMANDO STE . M IR A L O M A A V E E . L A P A L M A A V E N. T U STIN A VEN.BLUEGU M S TN. MI LLER STN. RIO VISTA ST3 0 8 5 E a s t L a Pa lm a A v e n u e D E V N o . 2 0 1 4 -0 0 0 3 1 Subject Property APN: 344-361-04 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph oto :Ma y 2 01 3 From: Joseph Karaki [mailto:jkaraki@westernsec.com] Sent: Tuesday, October 21, 2014 8:47 AM To: Amy K. Vazquez Subject: 3085 E La Palma Ave City of Anaheim Planning Department Amy Vazquez, Planner Reference: 3085 E La Palma Ave Anaheim, Ca Subject: Withdrawal of Application for VAR/ Signage Dear Amy, I am this e-mail requesting the withdrawal of the Variance, pertaining to the property above. If you have a question, pls. let me know at you convenience. Best Regards, JosephKaraki | President KARAKI IWESTERN STATES 4887 E. La Palma Ave | Suite 707 Anaheim, Ca 92807 T 714 695 9300 | 714 693 1002 | F www.westernsec.com “A great man is always willing to be little” ATTACHMENT NO. 2 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT NO. 2012-00558A LOCATION: 2626 East Katella Avenue (Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center - ARTIC) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner are the City of Anaheim, represented by the Public Works Department. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of an amendment to the Coordinated Sign Program approved for the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) project. The amendment would allow modifications to a sign program that was previously approved by the Planning Director. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, determine that Previously-Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 2010- 00343 (EIR No. 343) and the Previously-Approved Addendum are the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and approve Miscellaneous Permit No. 2012-00558A. BACKGROUND: This 19-acre site is being developed with the ARTIC facility. The centerpiece of ARTIC is a three-story, 120 foot high, 67,000 square foot intermodal transportation terminal. This building will include 12,075 square feet of commercial space for passenger-oriented retail and restaurants. A 456-space parking lot (Parking Lot A) will be provided in front of the building and a 221-space parking lot (Parking Lot B) will be provided south of the building and the adjacent railroad corridor. The 405-space parking lot (Parking Lot C) for the existing Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink station, located adjacent to the Angel Stadium of Anaheim parking lot, will be slightly reconfigured and will continue to provide parking for and access to the train platforms. Construction of ARTIC began in September 2012 and is almost complete, with a grand opening expected in December 2014. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT NO. 2012-00558A November 3, 2014 Page 2 of 6 The terminal building and Parking Lots A and B are located in the Semi Public (SP) Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone. Parking Lot C is located in the Public Recreational (PR) Zone and the PTMU Overlay Zone. All three properties are designated by the General Plan for Mixed-Use development. Surrounding land uses include a retail center and restaurant at the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and Douglass Road, Honda Center to the north across Katella Avenue, the Santa Ana River Trail to the east, State Route (SR-57) and Angel Stadium of Anaheim to the southwest, and an industrial park and a hotel to the west across Douglass Road. Transit facilities are permitted within the SP and PR Zones, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). City Council approved the CUP for ARTIC on May 29, 2012, concurrent with the introduction of a Zoning Code amendment to provide standards and an approval process for signs in conjunction with a transit facility within the SP and PR Zones. The ordinance was subsequently adopted on June 5, 2012. The Code amendment was necessary because sign standards for transit facilities were not addressed in the Code and the operation and maintenance of ARTIC is intended to be funded, in part, by advertising revenues. To address these issues, the Code was amended to permit signs in conjunction with a transit facility, including off-site advertising signs, subject to the approval of the Planning Director. Per the Zoning Code, approval of such signs must be based upon the following required findings: • The signs must be part of a coordinated sign program • The signs must complement the architecture of the transit facility and provide a unifying element along the streetscape. • The size, scale and style of the signs shall be internally consistent and consistent with the scale of the transit facility and the surrounding land uses. There are currently approximately 80 billboards in Anaheim. In 1958, the Anaheim Municipal Code was amended to prohibit the construction of new freeway-oriented billboards. The only remaining freeway-oriented billboards in the City are five billboards that were approved by the County of Orange prior to annexation of the underlying property to Anaheim and a billboard located on the Angel Stadium property that was constructed to finance public improvements. The last time the City issued a permit for the construction of a new billboard was in 1989. In 2006, the Anaheim Municipal Code was amended to prohibit the construction of any new billboards citywide. Although new billboards are not allowed in other areas of the City, the location and use of the ARTIC facility provides a unique opportunity to complement existing on- site and off-site advertising structures at the adjacent sports and entertainment venues and develop a sense of excitement and energy that would not be suitable on other properties beyond this stretch of the SR-57 freeway. At the time the Code Amendment and the CUP were approved by City Council, a conceptual sign program for ARTIC had been designed that included up to thirteen 85 foot tall by 20 foot wide off-site advertising signs with up to 760 square feet of advertising space per sign. The Addendum to the EIR prepared for ARTIC, and approved in conjunction with the ARTIC CUP and Code amendment, analyzed the environmental impacts of these signs. The amount of advertising now proposed is significantly less than what was shown in the conceptual program. MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT NO. 2012-00558A November 3, 2014 Page 3 of 6 On September 18, 2012, the Planning Director approved a Coordinated Sign Program for the ARTIC Project. This program included monument signs adjacent to the site entrances on Katella Avenue and Douglass Road; wall signs above the building entrances; bus shelter and train platform signs, which included outdoor advertising panels; and, other directional and informational signs. The approved sign program is included as Attachment 3 to this staff report. Although off-site advertising was contemplated at the time of the approval of the ARTIC CUP and related Code Amendment, the precise design of these outdoor advertising signs was not developed to the same extent as the other signs at the time of the approval of the coordinated sign program. In addition, at the time the coordinated sign program was approved, State law prohibited off-site advertising in this location due to the designation of SR 57 as a landscaped freeway. In order to address this prohibition, the City supported Senate Bill 694 (SB 694) which was signed by the Governor in 2013. This legislation authorizes local agencies that plan to build and operate future high speed rail stations to establish an advertising display program. SB 694 provides significant local control over advertising so that the jurisdiction in which the displays will be located within have a say on the number, spacing, illumination and hours of operation. Advertising, as authorized by the bill, is intended to significantly help local communities, like Anaheim, to defray operational and maintenance costs of these transit facilities and reduce the necessity for taxpayer offsets generating revenue from private investment while protecting the City’s transportation and general funds. On February 14, 2014, the City issued a Request for Proposal (RFP) for Indoor/Outdoor Advertising Services and on May 15, 2014, the City received two proposals. Staff has selected Clear Channel Outdoor as the recommended advertiser to provide these services; City Council is scheduled to review this selection on November 25, 2014. The proposed amendments to the ARTIC Coordinated Sign Program reflect the outdoor advertising sign concepts proposed by Clear Channel Outdoor. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to amend the Coordinated Sign Program previously approved by the Planning Director as described in the table below and illustrated in Attachment 4: Location (Adjacent to) Sign Type Approved Proposed One sign adjacent to Douglass Road and one sign adjacent to Katella Avenue Business Identification Monument Sign • 19’6” wide by 7’ tall • Double-sided • No off-site advertising • Up to 14’6” wide by 35’ tall • Signs include 10’2” wide by 18’6” tall (190 square foot) digital billboard faces allowing off-site advertising • Douglass Road – Single Sided Sign • Katella Avenue – Double Sided Sign MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT NO. 2012-00558A November 3, 2014 Page 4 of 6 Location (Adjacent to) Sign Type Approved Proposed SR-57 Freeway Billboard • Not included as part of the approved ARTIC Coordinated Sign Program • Conceptually proposed with the 2012 Code Amendment as: • Up to 85’ tall by 20’wide • Up to 760 square feet of advertising space • 84’ tall • V-shaped • Double-sided • 48’ wide by 14’ tall digital billboard faces (672 square feet) allowing off-site advertising A letter of request describing the proposed sign program, including justification of the proposed amendment, is included as Attachment 5. ANALYSIS: Although coordinated sign programs for transit facilities can be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director, the Director may refer an application to the Planning Commission when it is determined that the general public interest warrants such referral. Because the proposed amendment to the sign program includes advertising signs that are not permitted elsewhere in the City, the Planning Director has elected to refer this proposed amendment to the Planning Commission for review. As described in the attached letter of request, the proposed signs are designed to complement the other signs included as part of the previously-approved sign program. The large digital billboard proposed adjacent to the SR-57 freeway includes an aluminum, tubular design that conceals the sign’s structural support and emulates the main architectural features of the terminal building. The proposed monuments signs along Douglass Road and Katella Avenue include a graphic ARTIC logo on top, a digital display, and individual tenant panels which are internally illuminated by low-voltage LED lighting. The monument signs, which include off-site advertising, incorporate arched side elements comparable to the metal, rib-like features of the terminal building. These signs would also be edge-lit using internal full-color LED lighting, similar to the multi-color lights in the terminal building’s roof structure. Additionally, the sign frames include a metallic silver paint finish to mimic the ARTIC facility. The ARTIC facility is located along a stretch of the SR-57 freeway that is home to two regional entertainment venues, Angel Stadium of Anaheim and Honda Center, which attract millions of visitors to the area annually. These venues currently maintain significant forms of vibrant, highly-visible advertising visible from the SR-57 freeway and adjacent major roadways. As illustrated in the following table, the proposed ARTIC signs are, in fact, smaller in size as compared to the Angel Stadium and Honda Center Signs. MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT NO. 2012-00558A November 3, 2014 Page 5 of 6 Sign Height Digital Sign Face Sign Copy Angel Stadium Big “A” Sign Adjacent to SR 57 230 Feet 1,728 Square Foot Double-Sided Advertises Angel Stadium Events and Corporate Sponsors Honda Center Sign Adjacent to SR 57 94 Feet 925 Square Foot Double-Sided Advertises Honda Center Events and Corporate Sponsors Honda Center Sign Adjacent to Katella Avenue 49 Feet 850 Square Foot Double Sided Advertises Honda Center Events and Corporate Sponsors Proposed ARTIC Monument Signs 35 Feet 190 Square Foot Douglass Road – Single Sided Sign Katella Avenue – Double Sided Sign Business Identification and Off-Site Advertising Proposed ARTIC Billboard 84 Feet 672 Square Foot Digital Sign Face Double-sided Off-Site Advertising In addition, the existing double-sided billboard on the east side of SR 57, adjacent to the new ARTIC railroad platform, has a 960 square feet sign face; and the three-sided billboard on the west side of SR 57, on the Angel Stadium of Anaheim site, has sign faces that are approximately 1,200 square feet each. These billboard faces are larger than the 672 square foot billboard face proposed for ARTIC. The advertising program associated with ARTIC is designed to guide visitors to the facility and draw visual interest to the venue while generating significant amounts of advertising revenue that would be used to offset the expected maintenance costs for the facility. The previously approved addendum to EIR 343, prepared for the ARTIC project, analyzed the impacts of a sign program that could include up to thirteen 85 foot tall by 20 foot wide signs with up to 760 square feet of advertising space per sign. The largest of the three proposed signs would be 84 feet tall with a sign area of 672 square feet. Therefore, the proposed signs would not create a greater impact than those previously identified by the addendum. CONCLUSION: The proposed signs are compatible with the scale and visual character of the surrounding area and designed to complement the architecture of the transit facility. The design and operation of the proposed signs is also consistent with the advertising programs used for the adjacent sports and entertainment venues. Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the Coordinated Sign Program. MISCELLANEOUS PERMIT NO. 2012-00558A November 3, 2014 Page 6 of 6 Prepared by, Submitted by, Susan Kim Jonathan E. Borrego Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Applicant’s Request Letter The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 3. Coordinated Sign Program Approval Memo 4. Proposed Sign Exhibits 5. Site Photographs Previously-Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 2010-00343 (EIR No. 343) and the Previously-Approved Addendum are available at: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=4105. I (PTMU)KatellaAYRES HOTEL I (PTMU)KatellaARENA PLAZA I (PTMU)KatellaSPORTS GALLERYCOMMERCENTER SP (PTMU)ARTIC SP (PTMU)ARTIC SP (PTMU)ARTIC57 FREEWAY5 7 F R E E WA Y E KATELLA AVE S DOUGLASS RDE. KATELLA AVES. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S. SUNKIST ST2 6 2 6 East Kate lla Aven ue D EV No. 2 0 10-00043 B Subject Property APN: 232-072-06386-521-17 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 13 57 FREEWAY 5 7 F R E EW A Y E KATELLA AVE S DOUGLASS RDE. KATELLA AVES. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S. SUNKIST ST2626 East Katella Avenue DEV No. 2010-00043B Subject Property APN: 232-072-06 386-521-17 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: May 2013 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Coordinated Signage Program September 10, 2012 SG300 SIGNAGE GENERAL NOTES A00 SIGNAGE GENERAL NOTES SIGNAGE GENERAL NOTES: 1. SIGN FABRICATOR SHALL OBTAIN ALL APPLICABLE CITY OF ANAHEIM PERMITS PRIOR TO COMMENCING WORK. 2. ALL STRUCTURAL ELEMENTS SHOWN IN THESE DRAWINGS ARE SHOWN FOR DESIGN INTENT ONLY. FABRICATOR SHALL PROVIDE CERTIFIED ENGINEER STAMPED SHOP DRAWINGS. SHOP DRAWINGS TO INCLUDE STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS, WIND LOAD CALCULATIONS, FOOTING & CONNECTION DETAILS AS REQUIRED. 3. GC SHALL PROVIDE EXCAVATION & CONCRETE FOOTING FOR SIGNS REQUIRING FOOTING. REFER TO SIGNAGE SHOP DRAWINGS FOR FOOTING DETAILS. 4. GC SHALL CONSULT GEO TECHNICAL REPORT & VERIFY EXISTING CONDITIONS FOR SIGNS REQUIRING FOOTING. 5. GC TO NOTIFY THE ENGINEER IMMEDIATELY WHEREVER UTILITIES ARE ENCOUNTERED THAT ARE NOT IN UTILITY SHEETS. 6. GC SHALL RESTORE SURROUNDING AREAS AFTER FOOTING INSTALLATION. 7. SIGN CONTRACTOR TO TAKE ALL NECESSARY PRECAUTIONS TO PROVIDE PUBLIC SAFETY DURING SIGNAGE INSTALLATION. 8. SIGN FABRICATOR TO VERIFY ALL SIGN COPY WITH DESIGNER & OWNER PRIOR TO FABRICATION. 9. ALL PAINTED METALS SHALL BE MATTHEWS PAINT. 10. REFER TO PMS IN COLOR SCHEDULE FOR ALL VINYL COLORS. 11. EASE ALL EXPOSED EDGES ON ALUMINUM AND ACRYLIC. 12. ELIMINATE OIL-CANNING. SG301 COLOR, MATERIALS & TYPOGRAPHY ARTIC LOGO LOGOS - OTHER AGENCIES SYMBOLS REFLECTIVE FILMS TRANSLUCENT FILMS PAINT COLORS MATERIALS TYPOGRAPHY DIN Light - Regulation Sign Body Text ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890!@#$%^&*() DIN Regular - ADA & Wayfinding (Passes Title 24 proportion requirements) ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890!@#$%^&*() DIN - Bold ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890!@#$%^&*() DIN Medium - Identity ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz 1234567890!@#$%^&*() P2 MP02306 Czech Flag Blue P1 OPTION 1 MP25373 Chakra Blue Metallic OPTION 2 MP02110 Cook Islands Blue P3 MP46633 Silver Slate Metallic Coated for all sign types except following (to maintain non-reflective surface): A13, A14, A15, A16, A25, D10, D12 & C07(ADA sign panel only) P4 MP59647 Black is Black P5 MP32071 White Wonder R2 3M Scotchlite Refrective Graphic Film Blue R1 3M Scotchlite Refrective Graphic Film Light Blue R3 3M Scotchlite Refrective Graphic Film White T2 3M Scotchcal Translucent Film - European Blue T1 3M Scotchcal Translucent Film - Sultan Blue M1 Aluminum M2 Acrylic M3 Clear Polycarbonate 201819 21 22 23 24 25 26 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 43 44 45373839404241 27 28 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 1716 48 49 50 51 52454746 46 47 48 49 50 51 COLOR, MATERIALS & TYPOGRAPHY SG306 SIGN TYPE A02A02 - SITE IDENTITY MONUMENT 19'-6" 1'-0" ELEVATION - DOUGLASS Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 REAR ELEVATION - TYPICAL Scale: 1/4” = 1’- 0”4 ELEVATION - KATELLA Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 PLAN - TYPICAL Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 NOTE: NO ADDRESS NUMERALS ON DOUGLASS SIGN. 2'-2" (TOBASELINE)1'-4"CAP. HT. 19'-6" 18'-5"± (PER 81.5º CUT) 81.5° (VEHICLE SHOWN FOR SCALE PURPOSE ONLY.) PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL AS REQ’D FOR MAINTENANCE (MIN. VISIBILITY) WITH VANDAL-RESISTANT LOCKING MECHANISM AND WEATHER-PROOFING. 3'-11 1/2"10'-9" T1 (ADDRESS NUMERALS): 9” CAP. 9" (TO BASELINE) FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN CABINET, PAINTED P3. VINYL AMTRAK LOGO; T1 APPLIED TO FACE. TENANT LOGO T.B.D. NOTE: SIGN DIMENSIONS IDENTICAL TO DOUGLASS SIGN, EXCEPT ADDRESS NUMERALS AND POSITIONING OF TENANT LOGOS/NAMES. 3/4” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH- THRU LOGO; T1 APPLIED TO FACE. 7'-0" (ALIGN.) EXPOSED CONC. BASE WITH REVEAL. COLOR TO MATCH CABINET ABOVE SG307 SIGN TYPE A02A02 - SITE IDENTITY MONUMENT 19'-6" 1'-0" COOL WHITE LED STRIPS. ALUMINUM SIGN SKIN PAINTED SILVER P3. FRAMING ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 SECTION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”2 FRAMING PLAN Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 8" OR MIN. AS REQ’D BY LANDSCAPE ARCHITECT. PLAIN CONC. BED AS REQ’D. TRANSFORMER & ON/OFF SWITCH INSIDE CABINET AS REQ’D. TO POWER SOURCE; SIGN CONTRACTOR TO COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO SIGN LOCATION. (REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING PER ENGINEERING, BY SIGN CONTRACTOR.) GRASSY GROUND COVER; SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS AND VERIFY CONDITIONS. CONCRETE FOUNDATION BEYOND INDICATED WITH DOTTED LINE FOR CLARITY. PROVIDE WATERPROOFING MEMBRANE. 24V TRANSFORMER INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK WITH MECHANICAL ATTACHMENT TO INTERNAL POST AND FOUNDATION AS REQ'D. ELEVATION SHOWN WITH PUSH-THRU ACRYLIC LOGO INDICATED WITH DOTTED LINE FOR CLARITY; FACE PANEL REMOVED. 2 3/4” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH- THRU LOGO; T1 APPLIED TO FACE. 3/4" SG308 SIGN TYPE A03 NORTH ELEVATION - ENTRY Scale: 1/16” = 1’- 0”1 ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 EAST ELEVATION - ENTRY Scale: 1/16” = 1’- 0”2 3'-9" 3'-9 " 4 " 3'-3" 9" THICK FABRICATED ALUMINUM DIMENSIONAL LETTERS PIN-MOUNTED TO MOUNTING PLATE. PAINTED P1 ON FACE, P3 ON RETURNS AND BACK. TYPE STYLE: DIN MEDIUM. 3" DIA. ROUND ALUMINUM PINS PAINTED P3 A03 - BUILDING IDENTITY - PRIMARY SG310 SIGN TYPE A03 CANOPY SECTION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 6"9" 7" SIGN FABRICATOR TO PROVIDE MOUNTING ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED. MECHANICALLY MOUNTED TO STEEL CHANNEL BELOW FABRICATED ALUMINUM DIMENSIONAL LETTER, PAINTED P1 ON FACE, P3 ON RETURNS AND BACK PROVIDE NEOPRENE SHEET OR MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE CONTINUOUS CURVED STEEL CHANNEL (THICKNESS AS REQUIRED BY ENGINEERS) FOR THE WIDTH OF SIGN. WELDED TO STEEL TUBE BELOW MINIMIZE DEPTH OF BLOCKING 09LC-36-40-220-120, EcoSpec LINEAR HP EXT FIXTURE WITH ADJUSTABLE HINGED CLIPS. SEE LIGHTING SPEC SHEETS 3" DIA. ROUND ALUMINUM STAND-OFF TUBE, PAINTED P3. HEIGHT OF PIN TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD FOR OPTIMAL VIEW OF LETTERS CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE STEEL TUBES AT 2'-0" INTERVALS A03 - BUILDING IDENTITY - PRIMARY SG312 SIGN TYPE A04.1 ELEVATION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”3 CANOPY SECTION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”2 11 3/4" 2" 10" 11 3/4" 2" 6"2" 2" WEST ELEVATION - ENTRY Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 2" THICK FABRICATED ALUMINUM DIMENSIONAL LETTERS PIN-MOUNTED TO MOUNTING PLATE. PAINTED P1 ON FACE, P3 ON RETURNS AND BACK. TYPE STYLE: DIN MEDIUM. 3/4" DIA. ROUND ALUMINUM PINS PAINTED P3 09LC-36-40-220-120, EcoSpec LINEAR HP EXT FIXTURE WITH ADJUSTABLE HINGED CLIPS. SEE LIGHTING SPEC SHEETS HEIGHT OF PIN TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD FOR OPTIMAL VIEW OF LETTERS ALUMINUM ANGLE PAINTED P3 PEDESTAL SUPPORT LOCATED AT PANEL JOINTS (7'-6" O.C.) SIGN FABRICATOR TO PROVIDE MOUNTING ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED. MECHANICALLY MOUNTED TO STEEL SHEET BELOW PROVIDE NEOPRENE SHEET OR MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS A04.1 - BUILDING IDENTITY - SECONDARY (WEST ELEVATION) SG313 SIGN TYPE A04.1 ELEVATION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”3 CANOPY SECTION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”2 11 3/4" 2" 10" 11 3/4" 2" EAST ELEVATION - ENTRY Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 2" THICK FABRICATED ALUMINUM DIMENSIONAL LETTERS PIN-MOUNTED TO MOUNTING PLATE. PAINTED P1 ON FACE, P3 ON RETURNS AND BACK. TYPE STYLE: DIN MEDIUM. 3/4" DIA. ROUND ALUMINUM PINS PAINTED P3 09LC-36-40-220-120, EcoSpec LINEAR HP EXT FIXTURE WITH ADJUSTABLE HINGED CLIPS. SEE LIGHTING SPEC SHEETS HEIGHT OF PIN TO BE VERIFIED IN FIELD FOR OPTIMAL VIEW OF LETTERS ALUMINUM ANGLE PAINTED P3 PEDESTAL SUPPORT LOCATED AT PANEL JOINTS (7'-6" O.C.) SIGN FABRICATOR TO PROVIDE MOUNTING ASSEMBLY AS REQUIRED. MECHANICALLY MOUNTED TO STEEL SHEET BELOW PROVIDE NEOPRENE SHEET OR MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR MATERIALS 6"2" 2" A04.1 - BUILDING IDENTITY - SECONDARY (EAST ELEVATION) SG314 SIGN TYPE A04.2A04.2 - BUILDING IDENTITY - SECONDARY 13'-3" ELEVATION Scale: 6” = 1’- 0”3 TYPICAL SECTION Scale: 6” = 1’- 0”2 3 3/4" 1/2"EQ. 4 1/2" EQ. SOUTH ELEVATION LEVEL 1 - ENTRY Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 1/2" THICK FABRICATED ALUMINUM DIMENSIONAL LETTERS MOUNTED TO TO STEEL BEAM BEHIND WITH WELDED THREADED STUDS AND ADHESIVE AS REQ'D. PAINTED P1 ON FACE, P3 ON RETURNS. TYPE STYLE: DIN MEDIUM SG315 SIGN TYPE A04.3A04.3 - BUILDING IDENTITY - SECONDARY 36'-8" 2" 11 3/4" 1" 10" 2 SECTION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”2 ELEVATION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”3 2" 5 1/2" 10" 1" 2" SOUTH ELEVATION MEZZANINE- ENTRY Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 2" THICK FABRICATED ALUMINUM DIMENSIONAL LETTERS PIN-MOUNTED TO ALUMINUM BASE BELOW. PAINTED P1 ON FACE, P3 ON RETURNS. TYPE STYLE: DIN MEDIUM. 3/4" DIA. ROUND ALUMINUM PINS PAINTED P3 FABRICATED ALUMINUM BASE PAINTED P3 TO COVER OVER RECTANGULAR TUBE WITH COUNTERSUNK FASTENERS RECTANGULAR TUBE FASTENED TO MULLION WITH STUDS SG316 SIGN TYPE A05 Fullerton Orange Fullerton Orange FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 FACE ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”5 SECTION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”6 E06 (PLATFORM ADVERTISING DISPLAY) (EXTERIOR METAL PANEL CEILING, BY OTHERS; SEE ARCH. DWGS. FOR DETAILS.) (ALUMINUM PLATE METAL WALL PANEL, BY OTHERS; SEE ARCH. DWGS. FOR DETAILS.) COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED INTO SIGN CABINET. (CONTINUOUS SUPPORT CHANNEL BEHIND ALUMINUM WALL PANEL, BY OTHERS.) 2 3/4" (ARROW) 6 2 1'-0" SIGN TYPE A08 (PLATFORM NUMBER IDENTITY). 1/2” DEEP FROSTED CLEAR ACRYLIC, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU LETTERS; T1 APPLIED TO FIRST-SURFACE (CAP. HT.: 6") 3" DEEP FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET WITH REMOVABLE FACE (FOR FRONT-ACCESS MAINTENANCE); NO VISIBLE FASTENERS ON FACE OF SIGN; EXPOSED SURFACES OF FASTENERS (TAMPER-PROOF) TO BE PAINTED SAME AS BACKGROUND. 1/4” DEEP FROSTED CLEAR ACRYLIC, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU COPY & ARROW (CAP. HT.: 2 3/4") 10'-7 3/4" 2'-6"2'-6" 5'-7 3/4" (CANOPY) (PLATFORM CANOPY) (PLATFORM CANOPY shown.) (PLATFORM WALL) (EXISTING CONCRETE WALL) 3" (TYP.) 8'-0"8'-0"8'-0" SIGN TYPE A08 (PLATFORM NUMBER IDENTITY).(FABRICATOR TO COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO SIGN LOCATION.) (T.O. GRADE) (T.O. GRADE)(T.O. GRADE) (EXISTING CONC. WALL) (T.O. GRADE) A05 - PLATFORM STATION IDENTITY SG318 SIGN TYPE A08SLOPEELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 TOP VIEW Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 SECTION: DETAIL Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”5 ELEVATION: DETAIL Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”6 SIDE VIEW Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 SIDE VIEW Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 2 3 4 1 5- 6- 1'-6" (STANDING SEAM ROOF, BY OTHERS.) (1/8" ALUMINUM PLATE FASCIA, BY OTHERS.) (STEEL PLATES, BY OTHERS.) SIGN TYPES, A05 (PLATFORM STATION IDENTITY) AND E06 (PLATFORM ADVERTISING DISPLAY). 3" 1'-6" 1'-6"1'-6" 1'-6"1'-6" 100°CLAMPING PLATE, AS REQUIRED. POWER SUPPLY UNIT INSIDE SIGN BOX 1/4” THICK FROSTED TRANSLUCENT WHITE ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU NUMBER; BACK-LIT. COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO SIGN BOX. REMOVABLE BACK PANEL FOR MAINTENANCE; COUNTERSINK AND SECURE WITH TAMPER-PROOF FLATHEAD S.S. SCREWS; PROVIDE WEATHER-SEAL, AND PAINT ALL EXPOSED SURFACES OF FASTENERS SAME AS BACKGROUND. PROVIDE MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR METALS, AS REQUIRED. FASCIA, BY OTHERS. 1'-6" 1'-6"1'-5 1/2" (V.I.F.)1'-0" CAP. (SINGLE-SIDED.) (SINGLE-SIDED.)(SINGLE-SIDED.) 1'-3" (TO BASELINE) A08 - PLATFORM NUMBER IDENTITY SG319 SIGN TYPE A09 Fullerton Orange DETAIL Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”6 Fullerton Orange 3"3"3"3"3"3" FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 FACE ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 SIDE VIEW Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”5 DETAIL Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”3 2 3/4" (ARROW) 2 1'-0" 1/2” DEEP FROSTED CLEAR ACRYLIC, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU LETTERS; T1 APPLIED TO FIRST-SURFACE (CAP. HT.: 6") 3" DEEP FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET WITH REMOVABLE FACE (FOR FRONT-ACCESS MAINTENANCE); NO VISIBLE FASTENERS ON FACE OF SIGN; EXPOSED SURFACES OF FASTENERS (TAMPER-PROOF) TO BE PAINTED SAME AS BACKGROUND. 1/4” DEEP FROSTED CLEAR ACRYLIC, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU COPY & ARROW (CAP. HT.: 2 3/4") 1/2” DEEP FROSTED CLEAR ACRYLIC, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU LETTERS; T1 APPLIED TO FIRST-SURFACE (CAP. HT.: 6"). POWER SUPPLY UNIT INSIDE SIGN BOX. 2'-6" 8'-0" (T.O.GRADE) 3" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBE, WELDED TO 1/2" THICK STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM BASE PLATE; HOT-DIP GALVANIZED J-BOLT WITH LEVELING NUTS & WASHERS; PROVIDE MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS. 3- 2'-0" 1'-0" 8'-0" 6 NOTE: TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION MUST BE MIN. 4 1/2" BLOW FINISHED GRADE FOR GRADE FINISH BY OTHERS. FINISH PAVING, BY OTHERS. COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO THE SIGN LOCATION.REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING BY SIGN FABRICATOR. PROVIDE A HAND HOLE WITH A COVER SECURED WITH TAMPER-PROOF S.S. SCREWS; PROVIDE WEATHER SEAL, AND PAINT SAME AS BACKGROUND. SIGN PANELS SECURED TO POSTS THRU INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK. ELECTRICAL WIRING THRU ALUMINUM POST. A09 - PLATFORM STATION IDENTITY - FREESTANDING SG328 SIGN TYPE A18 ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”1 PLAN VIEW Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”4 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”2 FRAMING ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 4" 7 1/2" 81.5° 4" 2'-0" 1'-9" 7'-1/2" 10" 81.5° NOTE: TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION MUST BE MIN. 4 1/2" BLOW FINISHED GRADE FOR GRADE FINISH BY OTHERS. FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN PAINTED P1 & P3 ON ALL SIDES FOOTPRINT OF SIGN AT FINISHED GRADE SHOWN WITH DASHED LINE FOR VISUAL CLARITY. S.S. RAIL 1” x 4" RECTANGULAR ALUMINUM TUBE FRAMING WELDED TO BASE PLATE FOOTING SHALL COMPENSATE FOR THE WEIGHT FROM SIGN CANTILEVER VERIFY GRADE FINISH SEE LAND- SCAPING DRAWINGS CONCRETE FOOTING AS REQ’D BASE PLATE AS REQ’D CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 120V ELECTRICAL LINE COOL WHITE LED LIGHT STRIPS BEHIND SYMBOL & LETTERS. PROVIDE 24V TRANSFORMER WITHIN CABINET 1/4” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU LOGO; T1 APPLIED TO FACE ON BOTH SIDES 1/4” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU LOGO; T1 APPLIED TO FACE ON BOTH SIDES 1/4” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU SYMBOL 1/4” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH-THRU SYMBOL NOTE: ONE SIDE SWING OPEN WITH INTERNAL PIANO HINGES FOR MAINTENANCE. PROVIDE LOCK 3304 2 A18 - PICK-UP DROP-OFF IDENTITY SG329 SIGN TYPE A19 OPEN OPEN FULL LOTA 81.5° SECTION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”3 (VEHICLE SHOWN FOR SCALE PURPOSE ONLY.) 3 1/2" 1'-0" 11" 5" 5" S.S. RAIL S.S. RAIL 4304 1'-4" 2'-0" 1'-4" 10 1/2" 1'-6" 9'-8" 14'-7" 10" 4'-11" 3 3 SIM. 3SIM. 1/2” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU PICTOGRAM, ON BOTH SIDES; BACK-LIT.1/2” DEEP PUSH-THRU PICTOGRAMS 1/2” DEEP PUSH-THRU LETTERS WITH T1 FIRST-SURFACE APPLIED. 1/2” DEEP PUSH-THRU LETTERS"OPEN" IN GREEN "FULL" IN AMBER PAINTED P4 ON ALL FOUR (4) SIDES. 10" 4'-3 1/2±" 1/2" 10" LED LIGHTING APPARATUS, AS REQUIRED; PROVIDE TRANSFORMER (24V) WITH DISCONNECT SWITCH; CONNECT TO POWER SUPPLY IN JUNCTION BOX; COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL POWER TO THE SIGN LOCATION. DROP-IN SPACE AVAILABILITY DISPLAY (by Daktronics), SHOWN WITH DASHED LINE & LIGHT GRAY FOR CLARITY (MODEL: DF-2053-5-R/G): 10.5"H x 19.5"W x 3.7" D, OR APPROVED EQUAL. 1/2” DEEP FROSTED CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU PICTOGRAM. INTERNAL FRAMEWORK, AS REQUIRED. FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN STRUCTURE, PAINTED P1 & P3 ON ALL FOUR (4) SIDES, AS SHOWN; SCREENED PATTERNS TO MATCH P5. SPACE AVAILABILITY DISPLAY BOX, SHOWN WITH DOTTED LINE FOR CLARITY (5" CAP.) 1/2” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU LETTERS, ON BOTH SIDES; BACK-LIT. 1/2” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH- THRU LETTERS (9 1/2" CAP.); T1 APPLIED TO FACE. 1330 NOTE: LED COLOR -"OPEN" (Green) -"FULL" and "CLSD" (Red) 1'-4" SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”2 PLAN Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”4 ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”1 LED MESSAGE Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”4 A19 - PARKING ENTRANCE IDENTITY SG331 SIGN TYPE A20 FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 3/4” = 1’- 0”1 PLAN Scale: 3/4” = 1’- 0”5 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 3/4” = 1’- 0”2 BACK ELEVATION Scale: 3/4” = 1’- 0”3 FRAMING DETAIL Scale: 3/4” = 1’- 0”4 1'-6" 6" 81.5° 5'-0" 3'-8" 11" 8" 1'-4" NOTE: TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION MUST BE MIN. 4 1/2" BLOW FINISHED GRADE FOR GRADE FINISH BY OTHERS. S.S. RAIL 6" 1'-0" 1'-0" FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN PAINTED P1 & P3 ON ALL SIDES. COORDI- NATE FOOTING WITH CONTRACTOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE 120V ELECTRICAL LINE 2” SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBE FRAMING. 4 OUTER TUBES WELDED TO BASE PLATE FOOTING SHALL COMPENSATE FOR THE WEIGHT FROM SIGN CANTILEVER VERIFY GRADE FINISH SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS CONCRETE FOOTING AS REQ’D BASE PLATE AS REQ’D COOL WHITE LED LIGHT STRIPS BEHIND SYMBOL & LETTERS. PROVIDE 24V TRANSFORMER WITHIN CABINET REAR PANEL REMOVABLE FOR MAINTENANCE WITH TAMPER-PROOF COUNTERSINK SCREWS 1/2” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH- THRU LOGO; T1 APPLIED TO FACE ON ONE SIDE 1/2” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH- THRU SYMBOL ON ONE SIDE 1/2” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH- THRU LOGO; T1 APPLIED TO FACE ON ONE SIDE 1/2” DEEP TRANSLUCENT WHITE, BACK-LIT PUSH- THRU SYMBOL ON ONE SIDE 81.5° 14'-7" 3304 A20 - BUS/SHUTTLE ENTRANCE IDENTITY SG332 SIGN TYPE A21 1 2'-8"2'-8" 2 2 3 3 80.0° E07.3 (BUS SHELTER DISPLAY) FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 PLAN VIEW Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 AXONOMETRIC Scale: N.T.S.5 (BENCH BY OTHERS.) (BUS STALL, BY OTHERS.) C07 (TRAVEL INFORMATION DYNAMIC SIGN) E07.2 (BUS SHELTER DISPLAY) (OPEN TO BEYOND.) 2'-8"2'-8"2'-8"2'-8" SIGN FACES SIGN FACES (NOTE: BUS CANOPY ROOF IS SLANTED; SIGN FABRICATOR TO REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS PRIOR TO FABRICATION/INSTALLATION OF THE SIGNS.) (NOTE: AXONOMETRIC SHOWN FOR ILLUSTRATION PURPOSES ONLY; SIGN FABRICATOR TO REFERENCE ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS FOR DETAILS.) 2'-8" 3333 1333 6334 1334 A21 - BUS STALL IDENTITY SG333 SIGN TYPE A21 FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 BACK ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 BACK ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 BUS STALL ROOF BUS STALL ROOF BUS STALL ROOF FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN WITH P1 ON SIGN FACES AND P3 ON BACK AND RETURNS. 2'-6" 2'-8" 1'-6" CAP. 3"3/8" DEEP FROSTED CLEAR PUSH-THRU ACRYLIC NUMBERS WITH INTERNAL LED ILLUMINATION. 2'-8" 2'-8" 2'-0" (TO BASELINE) 1'-6" CAP. 2'-0" (TO BASELINE) 3" (T.B.D. BY SIGN CONTRACTOR PER ROOF SLOPE.) A21 - BUS STALL IDENTITY SG334 SIGN TYPE A21 SECTION: DETAIL Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”5 (STANDING SEAM ROOF, BY OTHERS.) (1/8" ALUMINUM PLATE FASCIA, BY OTHERS.) FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN BOX WITH NO VISIBLE SEAMS ALONG EDGES. (STEEL PLATES, BY OTHERS.) CLAMPING PLATE, AS REQUIRED. LOCATE POWER SUPPLY UNIT INSIDE SIGN BOX. 3/8” THICK FROSTED CLEAR ACRYLIC PUSH-THRU NUMBER; BACK-LIT. LED LIGHTING APPARATUS AS REQUIRED FOR EVEN ILLUMINATION WITH NO HOT / DARK SPOTS. COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO SIGN BOX. REMOVABLE BACK PANEL FOR MAINTENANCE; COUNTERSINK AND SECURE WITH TAMPER-PROOF FLATHEAD S.S. SCREWS; PROVIDE WEATHER-SEAL, AND PAINT ALL EXPOSED SURFACES OF FASTENERS SAME AS BACKGROUND. PUSH-THRU NUMBER ON ADJACENT FACE ON THE OTHER SIDE, SHOWN WITH DOTTED LINE FOR VISUAL CLARITY. PROVIDE MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS BETWEEN DISSIMILAR METALS, AS REQUIRED. 3/8" A21 - BUS STALL IDENTITY SG335 SIGN TYPE A22 1'-1" 10'-6" 5 1/8" THICK ALUMINUM PANEL MECHANICALLY ATTACHED TO LIGHT POLE TYPE CPLM-TH3F. REFER TO LIGHTING SHEETS FOR LIGHT POLE DETAILS. NOTE: SIGNS TO BE ATTACHED TO 2 LIGHT POLE TYPES WITH VARYING THICKNESSES - REFER TO LIGHTING SHEETS (LIGHT POLE, BY OTHERS.) 2 11 S.S. MOUNTING STRAP ATTACH SIGN FACE TO EXTRUDED ALUMINUM CHANNEL STIFFENER WITH 3M VHB TAPE, PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS FOR THE APPLICATION.A1/8" THICK ALUMINUM PANEL, PAINTED P1 & P3 (ALL RETURN AND BACK OF PANELS WITH P3.) DETAIL Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”5 DETAIL Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 ELEVATION Scale: 3/4” = 1’- 0”1 ELEVATION Scale: 3/8” = 1’- 0”3 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 3/4” = 1’- 0”2 1'-1"81.5° 1'-1" 3'-8" 1'-11"R3(4 1/2" CAP.) R1(10 1/2" CAP.) EASED CORNERS, TYP. A22 - PARKING ROW IDENTITY SG342 SIGN TYPE B02 8'-0" 4"4"4" 4"4"4" 4" 4" 9" 7'-0" (typ.) 10" (typ.) ELEVATION Scale: 1’- 0” = 1’- 0”1 CONNECTION DETAIL Scale: 1’- 0” = 1’- 0”3 SIGN PANEL DETAIL Scale: 1’- 0” = 1’- 0”4 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1’- 0” = 1’- 0”2 PLAN VIEW Scale: 1’- 0” = 1’- 0”5 FABRICATED ALUMINUM CABINET WITH WHITE LED INTERNAL ILLUMINATION. PAINTED WITH P1 & P3 ON ALL SIDES. 1/2” THICK ‘DAY & NIGHT’ ACRYLIC INTERNALLY-LIT PUSH-THRU LETTERS. BLUE IN THE DAY TO MATCH P1, WHITE AT NIGHT. WHITE PUSH-THRU ARROWS. SCREENED PATTERN TO MATCH P5. REAR PANEL TO BE REMOVABLE FOR MAINTENANCE NOTE: SIGN FABRICATOR TO CONSULT WITH STATE CERTIFIED ENGINEER FOR STRUCTURAL CALCULATIONS AND FOOTING DETAILS 4" ALUMINUM SQUARE STAGGERED POSTS (2) PAINTED P3 ON FACES AND P1 ON RETURNS 81.5°VERIFY GRADE FINISH SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS CONCRETE FOOTING AS REQ’D BASE PLATE AS REQ’D 4" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBE WELDED TO BASE PLATE BACKER PANEL WITH COOL WHITE LED LIGHT STRIPS ON ONE SIDE 24V TRANSFORMER FRONT & REAR PANELS REMOVABLE WITH TAMPER-PROOF STAINLESS FASTENERS PAINTED TO MATCH SIGN (Single-faced Sign Panels) CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE POWER LINE B02 - VEHICLE DIRECTION SECONDARY SG343 SIGN TYPE B04 3" 3" 3" DETAIL: FOUNDATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”4 ARTIC Station Honda Center Ground Transportation Lot C Angel Stadium Lot C Angel Stadium Lot C ARTIC Station FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”1 DETAIL: MESSAGE PANELS (TYP.) Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”7 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”2 BACK ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”3 TOP VIEW Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”5 DETAIL Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”6 FABRICATED ALUMINUM BOX WITH REFLECTIVE VINYL COPY; DOUBLE-SIDED WITH MESSAGES ON BOTH SIDES, TYP. 3" ALUMINUM SQUARE STAGGERED POSTS (2), PAINTED P3. 2 3 1 81.5° 10" 10'-10" 7'-6" 6'-0" 3"3"3" 7" 3" 7" 3" 7" 1'-1" 3"3"3" P1 (BACKGROUND FACES & RETURNS) WITH R3 (ARROW); ARROW HT.: 5 1/4" P3 (BACKGROUND FACES & RETURNS) WITH R1 (COPY); CAP. HT.: 3" SIGN PANELS SECURED TO POSTS THRU INTERNAL FRAMEWORK. (DOUBLE-SIDED.) NOTE: TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION MUST BE MIN. 4 1/2" BLOW FINISHED GRADE FOR GRADE FINISH BY OTHERS. REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING AS BY SIGN FABRICATOR AS REQUIRED. 3" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBE WELDED TO BASE PLATE. 6 (NOTE: SEE THE MESSAGE SCHEDULE & SIGN LOCATION PLANS FOR PANEL QUANTITY AT EACH SIGN LOCATION.) (FOR 2-PANEL SIGNS)(FOR 1-PANEL SIGNS) B04 - PEDESTRIAN DIRECTION EXTERIOR SG346 SIGN TYPE B06B06 - PEDESTRIAN DIRECTION - PLATFORM LEVEL 2 20'-0" LEVEL 3 36'-0" T.O.PLATFORM 7'-4" LEVEL 220' - 0" LEVEL 336' - 0" 6" 2 6 9 1/2" 10'-2" 12'-0" 3" MEN ARTIC STATION 5'-0" CL (TO BOTTOM OF TACTILE COPY) MEN ARTIC STATION CONNECTION DETAIL Scale: 1’- 0” = 1’- 0”3 4"6 1/2"9 1/2" 9 1/2"4'-8"2" 81.5° 3"3"3" ARTIC Station ARTIC Station ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 FACE ELEVATION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”5 SIGN PANEL SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”6 PLAN Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 2" DEEP FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN CABINET PAINTED P3. SCREENED ARROWS P5. SCREENED BLUE LETTERS, SYMBOLS P1. DOUBLE-SIDED 3" SQUARE FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN POLES PAINTED P3 ON FACE AND RETURNS VERIFY GRADE FINISH SEE ARCHITECTURE DRAWINGS CONCRETE FOOTING AS REQ’D BASE PLATE AS REQ’D 3" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBE WELDED TO BASE PLATE 3 1/2" 9" 1 1/4" 5/8"3/8"1/4" ADA SIGN Scale: 6” = 1’- 0”7 1/4" THICK ALUMINUM PANEL PAINTED P3 ON FACE AND RETURNS. EASE ALL EDGES. 1/16" RADIUSED ROUNDED CORNERS. 1/32" THICK TACTILE LETTERS PAINTED P1. SIGN ATTACHED TO POLES. NO VISIBLE FASTNERS ON FACE OF SIGN. PLACE SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF POLES. 7 SG349 SIGN TYPE C01.1 ELEVATION - TYPICAL Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 TOP VIEW Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”4 DETAIL Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”3 2 4 9" 4'-2" 15'-0" 18'-0" CL 81.5° 12" THICK RETAINING WALL WHERE OCCURS, BY OTHERS. DRY-PACK MORTAR AS REQ'D. PROVIDE A HAND HOLE WITH A COVER SECURED WITH TAMPER-PROOF S.S. SCREWS; PROVIDE WEATHER SEAL, AND PAINT SAME AS BACKGROUND. 6" HIGH CONCRETE PAD TO TOP OF FINISHED PAVING BY SIGN CONTRACTOR. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBE, WELDED TO 1/2" THICK STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM BASE PLATE; HOT-DIP GALVANIZED J-BOLT WITH LEVELING NUTS & WASHERS; PROVIDE MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS. 12" THICK RETAINING WALL WHERE OCCURS, BY OTHERS.4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBE 6" HIGH CONCRETE CURB AT FENCE LINE, BY OTHERS; REFERENCE CS-SERIES SHEETS. FINISH PAVING, BY OTHERS; SIGN CONTACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO THE SIGN LOCATION, INCLUDING LOCATION OF PULL BOX.REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING BY SIGN FABRICATOR. RETURNS (FRONT & BACK) PAINTED P1. 3- 1'-5" 12" THICK RETAINING WALL, BY OTHERS. EXTERIOR SIDE FACES OF LAMP HOUSING UNIT PAINTED P3. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBING, PAINTED P3. 2'-8" 9" 2'-6" (OR, AS REQ'D PER ENGINEERING) 1'-0" 6" 1'-0" VARIES. (REFERENCE CS-SERIES SHEETS.) 1'-0" 6"R 5" 6" 6" 6" 1353 C01.1 – PLATFORM LIGHT POLE – TYPICAL FOOTING SG350 SIGN TYPE C01.2C01.2 – PLATFORM LIGHT POLE WITH DYNAMIC INFORMATION– TYPICAL FOOTING ELEVATION - TYPICAL Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 TOP VIEW Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”4 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 Information 5:15 PM Pacific Surfrider #565To San Luis ObispoStatus 5:30pm Information 5:15 PM Pacific Surfrider #565To San Luis ObispoStatus 5:30pm DETAIL Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”3 2 9" 4'-2" 15'-0" 18'-0" CL 81.5° DRY-PACK MORTAR AS REQ'D. CONTINUOUS SEALANT BEAD. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBE, WELDED TO 1/2" THICK STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM BASE PLATE; HOT-DIP GALVANIZED J-BOLT WITH LEVELING NUTS & WASHERS; PROVIDE MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS. FINISH PAVING, BY OTHERS; SIGN CONTACTOR MUST COORDINATE WITH PAVING CONTRACTOR. COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO THE SIGN LOCATION. REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING BY SIGN FABRICATOR. 3- 12" THICK RETAINING WALL WHERE OCCURS, BY OTHERS. EXTERIOR SIDE FACES OF LAMP HOUSING UNIT PAINTED P3. PROVIDE WEEP HOLES AS REQUIRED. CUSTOM FABRICATED SIGN CABINET WITH OPENING TO MATCH SCREEN SIZE OF DISPLAY UNIT; PROVIDE BOTTOM-HINGED FRONT ACCESS FOR MAINTENANCE. DISPLAY UNIT (FRONT ACCESS, PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS.) SHOWN WITH WHITE DASHED LINE FOR VISUAL CLARITY. SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM MOUNTING BRACKET (SAME LENGTH AS SIGN CABINET HEIGHT), PAINTED P3; SECURE SIGN CABINET THRU INTERNAL FRAMEWORK WITHIN SIGN CABINET. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBING, PAINTED P3. 9" 2'-6" (OR, AS REQ'D PER ENGINEERING) 4'-6" 1'-7" 1'-7" 3" GALAXY DISPLAY AF-6200 SERIES (by Daktronics) (MODEL: AF-6200-32X144-8-RG-SF; 16X48, TRI-COLOR), OR APPROVED EQUAL. LED COLOR: AMBER FACE OF CABINET PAINTED P4; BACK AND RETURN OF CABINET PAINTED P1. 9'-6" 2'-5" 1'-5" 6"6" 12" THICK RETAINING WALL, WHERE OCCURS, BY OTHERS. SECURE SIGN CABINET TO ADDITIONAL CHANNEL BRACKET (P1) THRU INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK. PROVIDE A HAND HOLE WITH A COVER SECURED WITH TAMPER-PROOF S.S. SCREWS; PROVIDE WEATHER SEAL, AND PAINT SAME AS BACKGROUND. 2'-8" 4 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBING. TOP LED UNITS TO DISPLAY METROLINK INFORMATION BOTTOM LED UNITS TO DISPLAY AMTRAK INFORMATION 6"1'-0" 1353 4349 SG351 SIGN TYPE C01.3 ELEVATION - BRIDGE Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 DETAIL Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”4 PLAN VIEW AT SIGN BASE Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”3 EXISTING PARAPET AND FENCE BEYOND, BY OTHERS. 4" SQUARE SIGN TUBE. EXISTING CONCRETE PARAPET; EXISTING FENCE AT SIGN BASE TO BE REMOVED, BY OTHERS; COORDINATE WITH G.C. 1/2" THICK STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM BASE PLATE, SHOWN WITH DASHED LINE FOR CLARITY. 6" WIDE CONCRETE BUILDOUT, BY OTHERS; COORDINATE WITH G.C. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBE, WELDED TO 1/2" THICK STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM BASE PLATE; HOT-DIP GALVANIZED J-BOLT WITH LEVELING NUTS & WASHERS; PROVIDE MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS. EXISTING PARAPET BEYOND, SHOWN WITH DASHED LINES FOR CLARITY. 6" WIDE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDOUT, BY OTHERS. COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO THE SIGN LOCATION, INCLUDING PULL BOX. EQ.EQ. 2 1/2" 30° 3 1'-11" 2'-0" 2'-6" 9" 4'-2" 4-81.5° 16'-2"EXTERIOR SIDE FACES OF LAMP HOUSING UNIT PAINTED P3. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBING, PAINTED P3. 15'-0" CL RETURNS (FRONT & BACK) PAINTED P1. 1'-5" 1353 6"1'-0"6" PROVIDE A HAND HOLE WITH A COVER SECURED WITH TAMPER-PROOF S.S. SCREWS; PROVIDE WEATHER SEAL, AND PAINT SAME AS BACKGROUND. EXISTING FENCE BEYOND, CUTOUT AT POLE BASE, BY OTHERS. C01.3 – PLATFORM LIGHT POLE – ABOVE GRADE FOOTING SG352 SIGN TYPE C01.4 C01.4 – PLATFORM LIGHT POLE WITH DYNAMIC INFORMATION– ABOVE GRADE FOOTING Pacific Surfrider #565 To San Luis Obispo Status 5:30pm 5:15 PM Information Pacific Surfrider #565 To San Luis Obispo Status 5:30pm 5:15 PM Information ELEVATION - BRIDGE Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 DETAIL Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”4 PLAN VIEW AT SIGN BASE Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”3 EXISTING PARAPET AND FENCE BEYOND, BY OTHERS. 9" 4'-2" 4-81.5° 16'-2"EXTERIOR SIDE FACES OF LAMP HOUSING UNIT PAINTED P3. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBING, PAINTED P3. GALAXY DISPLAY AF-6200 SERIES (by Daktronics) (MODEL: AF-6200-32X144-8-RG-SF; 16X48, TRI-COLOR), OR APPROVED EQUAL. LED COLOR: AMBER FACE OF CABINET PAINTED P4; BACK AND RETURN OF CABINET PAINTED P1. 15'-0" CL SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 1353 4'-6" 1'-7" 1'-7" 3" 9'-6" 2'-5" 6"6" (EXISTING FENCE AND RETAINING WALL BEYOND.) EXISTING FENCE BEYOND, CUTOUT AT POLE BASE, BY OTHERS. 4" SQUARE SIGN TUBE. EXISTING CONCRETE PARAPET; EXISTING FENCE AT SIGN BASE TO BE REMOVED, BY OTHERS; COORDINATE WITH G.C. 1/2" THICK STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM BASE PLATE, SHOWN WITH DASHED LINE FOR CLARITY. 6" WIDE CONCRETE BUILDOUT, BY OTHERS; COORDINATE WITH G.C. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM TUBE, WELDED TO 1/2" THICK STRUCTURAL ALUMINUM BASE PLATE; HOT-DIP GALVANIZED J-BOLT WITH LEVELING NUTS & WASHERS; PROVIDE MEANS TO PREVENT ELECTROLYSIS. EXISTING PARAPET BEYOND, SHOWN WITH DASHED LINES FOR CLARITY. 6" WIDE REINFORCED CONCRETE BUILDOUT, BY OTHERS. COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL FEED TO THE SIGN LOCATION, INCLUDING PULL BOX. EQ.EQ. 2 1/2" 30° 3 1'-11" 2'-0" 2'-6" 6"1'-0"6" PROVIDE A HAND HOLE WITH A COVER SECURED WITH TAMPER-PROOF S.S. SCREWS; PROVIDE WEATHER SEAL, AND PAINT SAME AS BACKGROUND. 4350 TOP LED UNITS TO DISPLAY METROLINK INFORMATION BOTTOM LED UNITS TO DISPLAY AMTRAK INFORMATION SG353 SIGN TYPES C01.1/ C01.2/C01.3/C01.4 C01.1/C01.2/CO1.3/C01.4 15 7 /8" (403mm) 11 1/8 " (282mm) 4 1/8 " (104mm) LIGHT FIXTURESPEAKERS SHOWN FOR POSITIONING. PROVIDE MOUNTING BRACKETS FOR SPEAKERS. LENS (NO LIGHT LEAKS OTHER THAN THROUGH THE LENS.) PERFORATED FOR SPEAKERS WITH WATER-TIGHT SEAL. (NOTE: PROVIDE A MEANS TO PREVENT MOISTURE BUILD-UP.) DOME CAMERA SPEAKER DOME CAMERA 9" 4'-2" WI-FI ANTENNA 3.72" 7.25" (cutout) 1'-5" WI-FI ANTENNA 3.26" 7.45" Product Specs: Light Fixture N.T.S.7 Product Specs: Camera Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”5Product Specs: Speaker N.T.S.6 Product Specs: WI-FI ANTENNA N.T.S.4 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”1BOTTOM VIEW Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 FRONT VIEW Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 3 2 LOWELL UNIHORN (15W) Model: LUH-15T Frequency Response: 740Hz-7.4kHz (+/- 6dB) Sound Pressure Level: 105dB (average) Reference Manufacturer's Specs. for more information. (Or, approved equal.) CITYLITER 150 (SE'LUX) Reference Manufacturer's Specs. for more information. (Or, approved equal.) IE30 Sarix IP Rugged Fixed Dome (PELCO) Imager Type: CMOS Imager Readout: Progressive Scan Max. Resolution: 2048x1536 Auto Iris Lens Type: DC Drive Reference Manufacturer's Specs. for more information. (Or, approved equal.) Outdoor Wi-Fi Directional Antenna Heavy duty, weather proof, high powered antenna for extending the range of wireless 802.11 b or 802.11g WiFi devices. Device T.B.D. SG354 SIGN TYPE C02 (LCD monitor)PLATFORM REGULATIONS Please purchase Metrolink tickets at vending machines prior to boarding. Favor de comprar boleto Metrolink en el vendedor automatico antes de abordaje. No bicycling, rollerskating or skateboarding allowed on platform. No se permiten bicicletas, patines o patinetas en la plataforma. Thank you for not smoking. Gracias por no fumar. (REINFORCED CONCRETE FOOTING PER ENGINEERING, BY FABRICATOR.) TO POWER SOURCE; FABRICATOR TO COORDINATE WITH G.C. S.S. RAIL S.S. RAIL 3304 2 4 1 3 FRONT ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”1 TOP VIEW Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”3 BACK ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”2 1'-10" (CABINET A)(ACTUAL MONITOR SIZE SHOWN WITH DASHED LINE.)(CABINET B) FREESTANDING FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN CABINET WITH BUILT-IN DIRECTORIES FOR CHANGEABLE GRAPHIC INSERTS (BACK-LIT) AND LCD MONITOR; PAINTED P1 & P3; SINGLE-SIDED. (LCD MONITOR: 3'-2" x 2'-0" OPENING)(CABINET C) (CABINET D) 3'-0"(TYP.) 3'-3"(TYP.) 7'-2"7'-2" 81.5° 3'-6" 5 1/2" 1/2" REVEAL 1'-2" 1'-2" 3'-2"(ELECTRICAL WIRING, COMMUNICATIONS CONNECTIONS AND CONDUITS.) (CONTENTS OF ALL DISPLAY PANELS ARE TO BE PROVIDED BY METROLINK AND AMTRAK.) 15'-2" 15'-2" 1'-8" C02 - PLATFORM DIRECTORY SG355 SIGN TYPE C02C02 - PLATFORM DIRECTORY (LCD monitor) ENCL HOT COLD HEAT SIN LOSURE T SIDE HEAT SINKS SIDE NK FINS COL HOT COLD D SIDE FANS T SIDE OF AC OF ENCLOS D SIDE OF AC ENCLOSU HOT SIDE FANS (OUTSIDE URE) C (INSIDE OF URE) CO HEAT HOT S S OLD SIDE T SINK FINS SIDE HEAT SINKS FRONT ELEVATION: Details Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 SECTION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”2 ILLUSTRATION: AC UNIT DETAILS PER MANUFACTURER N.T.S.3 SCREENED COPY (6" CAP.; P1) (LOCATION OF AC UNIT, INDICATED WITH DOTTED LINE.) (DRAIN TUBE MUST BE DIRECTED DOWN TO GRADE.) SCREENED LOGO. REINFORCED DOOR WITH TAMPER-PROOF LOCKING MECHANISM, WITH SLOTS FOR VENTILATION AS REQUIRED BY MANUFACTURER. SEAL THE INNER CHAMBER. INTERNAL STRUCTURAL FRAMEWORK AS REQUIRED; PROVIDE ACCESS PANEL ON BACK WITH MIN. VISIBILITY; USE TAMPER-PROOF FLATHEAD SCREWS. THIN MAGNETIC STRIP ALONG VERTICAL EDGE OF PLEXI FOR REMOVABILITY FOR MAINTENANCE. 1/4" THICK CLEAR LEXAN PANEL 3/8" THICK CLEAR LEXAN PANEL STAINLESS BUTTON HEAD TAMPER-PROOF DOOR LOCKS (TOP AND BOTTOM) 1/8" THICK PLEXI DIFFUSER PANEL (TRANSLUCENT WHITE) WITH FIRST-SURFACE MOUNTED SCOTCHPRINT GRAPHICS (SOLVENT-BASED EXTERIOR-GRADE DIGITAL PRINT) For further coordination / information, contact Josh Liegel (Senior Sales Engineer) at EIC Solutions, Inc. P: 215.443.5190 (x14) E: jliegel@eicsolutions.com; www.eicsolutions.com STAINLESS STEEL PIANO HINGE, PAINTED SAME AS DOOR FRAME. GE TETRA MINISTRIP LED LIGHTING; PROVIDE TRANSFORMER WITH DISCONNECT SWITCH PER MANUFACTURER'S SPECS.; CONNECT TO POWER SUPPLY IN JUNCTION BOX; COORDINATE WITH G.C. FOR ELECTRICAL POWER TO THE SIGN LOCATION. 1/2" HIGH/DEEP REVEAL 2'-3" (TYP. FOR CABINETS A, B, C & D) 2 2'-0" (TYP. FOR CABINETS A, B, C & D) 2'-0" 3'-2" 3'-0" (TYP. HT. FOR ALL WINDOW OPENINGS) 3'-3" (TYP. HT. FOR ALL WINDOW FRAMES) NOTE: SIGN FABRICATOR TO PROVIDE THE INFRASTRUCTURE TO SUPPORT BOTH THE ELECTRICAL AND DATA CONNECTIONS IN THE AREA OF THE LCD MONITOR WITHIN THE STRUCTURE. THE DEPTH OF THE SIGN STRUCTURE SHALL BE ADJUSTED BY SIGN FABRICATOR AS REQUIRED FOR THE MEDIA CONVERTERS, FIBER OPTIC CABLE TERMINATIONS AND OTHER SUPPORTING EQUIPMENT WITHIN THE UNIT; APPROVAL BY THE CLIENT IS REQUIRED PRIOR TO FABRICATION / INSTALLATION. A SINGLE POINT OF POWER FOR THE AC AND LCD SCREEN (A SINGLE 20A CIRCUIT, 1.5 KW LOAD) WILL BE PROVIDED. 1'-3" THERMOTEC 145 SERIES - 1500 BTU, BY EIC SOLUTIONS, INC. (MADE IN USA), OR AS APPROVED EQUAL. ATTACH AC UNIT TO HINGED PANEL (WEATHER-SEALED) WITHIN THE CABINET FOR ACCESSIBILITY. DIRECT DRAIN TUBE DOWN TO GRADE WITH MINIMUM VISIBILITY. VIZIO’S 47” EDGE LIT RAZOR LED LCD HDTV (MODEL NUMBER: M470SL), OR APPROVED EQUAL: TO DISPLAY DIGITAL CLOCK, VISUAL MESSAGING, BUS SCHEDULE & MAP. (SOFTWARE & PROGRAMMING BY OTHERS.) (PROVIDE AIR VENT GRILLE FOR HOT AIR ESCAPE.) 2" SG360 SIGN TYPE C05 METROLINK TO LOS ANGELES IN 20 MINITES2TRACK1TRACKMETROLINK TO OCEANSIDE IN 5 MINITES METROGELES IN 20 M2TRACK 9'-5" 1'-2"1'-2"81.5° 9'-6" 4" 9'-5" 1'-2"81.5° 9'-6" 4" 10" (CAP. HT.) 2 1/2" (CAP. HT.)GALAXY DISPLAY AF-3200 SERIES (by Daktronics), SHOWN WITH DASHED LINE FOR CLARITY (MODEL: AF-3200-16X240-8-A): 10"H x 6'-5"W x 5" D, OR APPROVED EQUAL. LED COLOR IS AMBER. 3" CAP. 1'-5"1'-5" TRACK NUMBER: SCREENED COPY (P5) 1'-0" 11'-8"11'-8" FABRICATED ALUMINUM SIGN CABINET: PAINTED P1 FOR TRACK NUMBER PORTION; THE REST PAINTED P3. FACE PANELS ATTACHED WITH S.S. MACHINE SCREWS FOR MAINTENANCE; ALL EXPOSED SURFACES OF SCREWS PAINTED TO MATCH BACKGROUND. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL TUBING, PAINTED P3. MOUNTING BRACKETS WITHIN SIGN CABINET SHOWN WITH DOTTED LINE FOR CLARITY. ALUMINUM CHANNEL MOUNTING BRACKET INSIDE SIGN CABINET. 4" SQUARE STRUCTURAL TUBING INTERNAL FRAMEWORK AS REQ'D, SHOWN WITH DOTTED LINE FOR CLARITY. DISPLAY UNIT WITHIN SIGN CABINET, SHOWN WITH DOTTED PATTERN FOR CLARITY; PROVIDE HEAT SINK, PER MANUFACTURER'S RECOMMENDATIONS. 1'-0" CL 6 1'-0" VERIFY GRADE FINISH SEE ARCHITECTURE DRAWINGS 9" CONNECTION DETAIL Scale: 1’- 0” = 1’- 0”5 CONCRETE FOOTING AS REQ’D BASE PLATE AS REQ’D 4" SQUARE ALUMINUM TUBE WELDED TO BASE PLATE CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE POWER & DATA LINES ELEVATION - LEVEL 2 Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”3 ELEVATION - LEVEL 2 Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”1 PLAN Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”6 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1/2” = 1’- 0”2 DETAIL Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”4 SECTION Scale: 1 1/2” = 1’- 0”7 22 C05 - TRAVEL INFORMATION DYNAMIC SIGN - MEDIUM SG368 SIGN TYPE D05 ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”1 SIDE ELEVATION Scale: 1” = 1’- 0”2 BIKE PATH 7'-0" CONNECTION DETAIL Scale: 2” = 1’- 0”3 FACE ELEVATION Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”4 SIDE VIEW Scale: 3” = 1’- 0”5 NOTE: TOP OF CONCRETE FOUNDATION MUST BE MIN. 4 1/2" BELOW FINISHED GRADE. BIKE PATH 1'-3 1/2"2" 5" 1'-2 1/2" 2" 81.5° GRADE FINISH BY OTHERS; SEE LANDSCAPE DRAWINGS. CONCRETE FOOTING AS REQ’D. BASE PLATE AS REQ’D. 1 1/2" SQUARE ALUMINUM POST WELDED TO BASE PLATE. 1 1/2" SQUARE POLE PAINTED SILVER PAINTED ALUMINUM SIGN WITH REFLECTIVE LETTERS AND GRAPH- ICS. MECHANICALLY ATTACHED TO POST WITH WELDED THREADED STUDS D05 - BIKE PATH STANCHION ATTACHMENT NO. 4 V. 09.2014 Exhibit #16 Sample Specifications Sheet 14' x 48' Digital Billboard Digital Billboard Model Specifications Rows &Columns Pixel Spacing(mm)Technology Active AreaFeet and Inches (H x W) Overall Area Feet and Inches (H x W)Weight Pounds (kg)OperatingWattage**Operating Amps** 198x702 20 MT 13'2" x 46'10" 13'8" x 47'2" 7,100 (3,221)3,949 16 242x858 16 MT 13'2" x 46'10" 13'8" x 47'2" 7,100 (3,221)3,949 16 264x936 15 OT 13'2" x 46'10" 13'8" x 47'2" 7,100 (3,221)3,949 16 Power Requirements: 66 Amps Max Brightness*: 10,500 nits Service Access: Front and rear access-standard Environmental Protection: Fully-sealed IP-67 module, fully-sealed power supply, and PLR LEDs per Pixel: 3 color matched LEDs: 1 red, 1 green, 1 blue Viewing Angle: 160° H x 70° V Compliance Information: UL, cUL, UL-Energy Verified, IBC 2006/2009 FCC Compliant Operating Temperature: -30° to +120° F (-34° to +49° C) 201 Daktronics Dr PO Box 5128 Brookings, SD 57006-5128 tel 888-325-7446 605-692-0200 ext. 57220 fax 605-692-0381 www.daktronics.com/billboards email outdoor@daktronics.com Copyright © 2013 DD1271216 Rev 25 051713 Model Specifications for 4200 Series Digital Billboards Contrast: High-contrast, non-reflective louver design Color Capability: 19 bit - 144 quadrillion Light Control Standards: Complies with local, federal, and industry light output standards Diagnostics: Advanced diagnostics checks the following: - Pixel and LED health - Module and display temperatures - Display dimming - Non-visual alerts - Visual inspection Filterless Display: Less maintenance, sealed components with increased reliability Display Calibration: Factory calibrated individual LEDs Display Dimming: 256 dimming levels Integrated Control System: - Governs hold times - Limits media to static images Visual Verification: - Webcam - Retractable webcam arm (where applicable) SmartLink™: Remote control and redundant communication Multidirectional Light Sensor System: Multi-direction sensing with power-saving algorithms Surge Suppression: Standard * Max brightness can be adjusted to meet local regulations. **Measurements based on content over a 24 hour period. For precise measurements, request a Daktronics shop and riser drawing. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 Northbound SR‐57Proposed Billboard LocationPole indicates proposed height Southbound SR‐57Proposed Billboard LocationPole indicates proposed height Katella Avenue, Facing WestProposed Monument Sign LocationFlags indicate proposed height Katella Avenue, Facing WestProposed Monument SignFlags indicate proposed height Katella Avenue Bridge, Facing WestProposed Monument SignFlags indicate proposed height Katella Avenue Facing EastProposed Monument SignFlags indicate proposed height Katella Avenue, Facing EastProposed Monument SignFlags indicate proposed height Douglass Road, Facing SouthProposed Monument Sign LocationFlags indicate proposed height 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05739 LOCATION: 2095 East Katella Avenue APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Saddleback Church, represented by Steve Camp with Elements Architecture. The property owner is 2125 East Katella Avenue Holdings, LLC, represented by Marilyn Lucas. REQUEST: The applicant proposes to establish a church within an existing commercial building formerly occupied by Bally’s Total Fitness. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that a Class 1 Categorical Exemption is the appropriate environmental determination for this request and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05739. BACKGROUND: This 11.8 acre property is developed with an office building, hotel, restaurants, parking structure, and a building formerly occupied by a physical fitness facility. The property is zoned Low Intensity Office (O-L), Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone and the General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding properties are also within the PTMU Overlay and include Stadium Lofts to the west, railroad tracks to the north and east and residential/mixed use developments and The City National Grove to the south. Saddleback Church has been renting The City National Grove for church services for two and a half years and would be relocating to the proposed location. PROPOSAL: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to allow the conversion of the former physical fitness facility to a 36,430 square foot church, including a future mezzanine expansion, for a total of 41,130 square feet. No exterior changes to the building are proposed. Church services would be held Saturdays at 6 p.m. and Sundays at 9 a.m., 11 a.m. and 6 p.m. with daily office hours of 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. Children’s ministry would be provided at each service; no child care or private school is proposed. Various ministries would meet on Monday through Saturday evenings, from 6:30 p.m. to 10 p.m. These ministries would range in attendance from five to 100 people. The church would include a 9,375 square foot sanctuary, a large meeting room, lobby, café, nursery, classrooms, offices and a youth center. The café is for use by congregants only and would not be open to the general public. Plans also indicate a future kitchen on the first floor and two second floor expansion areas which are proposed as future youth ministry areas. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05739 November 3, 2014 Page 2 of 2 ANALYSIS: Churches are permitted at this location, subject to approval of a conditional use permit to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. Staff does not anticipate land use conflicts with surrounding properties since the church is relocating from The City National Grove, immediately south of the proposed location, where it has operated without any impacts to the area. The church would be compatible with the office building within the complex because church services and ministry meetings would be held outside of typical office business hours. Parking: Based on the size of the sanctuary, offices and meeting room, the church requires 288 parking spaces. Combined with the other uses in the complex, a total of 847 parking spaces are required and 833 spaces are provided. A variance is not required because the Zoning Code allows credit for off-setting hours of operation within multi-tenant properties when determining the required number of parking spaces. A parking study was conducted by LSA Associates to evaluate the availability of parking for the proposed church and existing businesses in the center (Attachment 6). The study also analyzed on-site circulation to determine whether vehicle congestion from the church could have any impact on public streets. The study concluded that there would be sufficient parking supply for all uses operating in the complex and that the use would not impact public streets. The draft resolution contains a condition of approval requiring a parking management plan be developed, including a provision that church staff be provided to direct on-site traffic circulation before and after services to minimize conflicts between the other on-site businesses. The parking structure is currently used as an event pay lot for The City National Grove and Angel Stadium. The property owner has decided to no longer allow event parking in order to minimize the potential for parking conflicts with the church. A condition of approval prohibiting event parking has been included in the draft resolution. CONCLUSION: Staff supports the proposed project as the church would be compatible with the mix of residential and commercial land uses in the Platinum Triangle. The church would also be compatible with the office and commercial uses on the property since the church would operate primarily on Sundays and weeknight evenings during off-peak hours. Staff recommends approval of the project. Prepared by, Submitted by, Elaine Thienprasiddhi Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Resolution 3. Applicant’s Letter of Request 4. CUP Justification The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s website at www.anaheim.net/planning. 5. Development Plans and Site Photographs 6. Parking and Circulation Analysis 7. Letter of Opposition O-L (PTMU)KatellaBANK I (PTMU)KatellaVACANT O-L (PTMU)KatellaOFFICES I (PTMU)INDUSTRIAL O-L (PTMU)KatellaCONDOMINIUMS/TOWNHOUSES O-L (PTMU)KatellaTOWNPLACE SUITESBY MARRIOTT I (PTMU)KatellaSERVICE STATION I (PTMU)NORTH STADIUMBUSINESS CENTER I (PTMU)PARKING LOT I (PTMU)AUTO REPAIR/SERVICE I (PTMU)KatellaRESTAURANT PR (PTMU)StadiumTHE GROVEOF ANAHEIM O-L (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area CRESTAURANTS O-L (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area CBALLY FITNESS O-L (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area CPARKING LOT O-L (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area CRESTAURANTS E KATELLA AVES STATE COLLEGE BLVDSTADI UM CROSSI NGHUDSON PLS STADIUM CROSSINGE. KATELLA AVES. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S. HASTER STS. ANAHEIM BLVDS. SUNKIST STE. GENE AUTRY WAY S.DOUGLASSRD2 0 9 5 East Kate lla Aven ue D EV No. 2 0 14-00054 Subject Property APN: 253-531-13253-531-23253-531-18253-531-16253-531-12253-531-15253-531-17 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 13 E KATELLA AVES STATE COLLEGE BLVDSTADI UM CROSSI NGHUDSON PLS STADIUM CROSSINGE. KATELLA AVES. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S. HASTER STS. ANAHEIM BLVDS. SUNKIST STE. GENE AUTRY WAY S.DOUGLASSRD2 0 9 5 East Kate lla Aven ue D EV No. 2 0 14-00054 Subject Property APN: 253-531-13253-531-23253-531-18253-531-16253-531-12253-531-15253-531-17 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 13 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05739 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2014-00054) (2095 EAST KATELLA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05739 to establish a church within a commercial building at a retail and office center (referred to herein as the "Proposed Project") located at 2095 E. Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 11.8 acres in size and is currently developed with an office building, hotel, restaurants, parking structure and former physical fitness facility. The Proposed Project will occupy that portion of the Property that was previously used as a physical fitness facility, consisting of not more than 41,130 square feet. The Property is located in the "O-L" Low Intensity Office and the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Mixed-Use land uses; and WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, on November 3, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the “Code”), to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05739 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to outdoor automobile sales events at an existing credit union, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The Proposed Project is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Section No. 18.08.030.010 of the Code. - 1 - PC2014-*** 2. The Proposed Project will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because church activities will be contained within the building and based on the parking demand analysis, more than adequate parking is provided on-site during all peak periods; 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Property is currently developed with the commercial building to be occupied by the church. The Proposed Project does not involve modification of the site or expansion of any existing buildings; and 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets. Further, the church is relocating from its current location south at The City National Grove across the street from the proposed location. The nearby intersections were analyzed in a circulation analysis and determined that there will not be an impact to the City arterials; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05739, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property to be used for the Proposed Project in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 2 - PC2014-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 3, 2014. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 3, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of November, 2014. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 3 - PC2014-*** - 4 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05739 (DEV2014-00054) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 1 A Shared Parking Permit shall be submitted for review and approval. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 2 Plans shall indicate an intersection ground marking of “Keep Clear” at the on-site non-signalized drive aisle intersection. Planning Department, Planning Services Division PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF OPERATIONS 3 A parking management plan, subject to review and approval by City staff, shall be required. The management plan Church staff shall be located in the parking lot to direct patrons to their parking destinations and marshal traffic to minimize delay and congestion. Planning Department, Planning Services Public Works, Traffic Engineering OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 4 No parking areas within the subject property, including the parking structure, shall be used for event parking for The City National Grove, Angel Stadium, or any other off-site uses or events. Planning Department, Planning Services Public Works, Traffic Engineering 5 This church facility shall not include any child day care/pre- school activities, except during church services. There shall be no private school permitted in conjunction with the church. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 6 No outdoor uses and/or assembly or outdoor storage shall occur on the property. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 7 Church activities shall be permitted from 6:30 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. on weekdays, with no time restrictions on weekends. Church office uses are not subject to this restriction. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 8 No portable signs shall be utilized to advertise the church or cafe. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 9 The café shall not be open to the public. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 10 The property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty four (24) hours from time of occurrence. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division - 5 - PC2014-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS 11 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 12 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 13 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 6 - PC2014-*** ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 NORTHA1SITE PLAN1"=50'-0"Saddleback Church Anaheim Campus2095 EAST KATELLA, ANAHEIM, CA 92806October 21, 2014EXIST. HOTELEXIST.HOTELEXIST.BANKEXIST.RESTAURANTEXIST.RESTAURANTSEXIST.RESTAURANTSEXIST.OFFICES(4 LEVELS)E KATELLA AVE.E KATELLA AVE .S STATE COLLEGE BLVD.ȭ A.T. AND S.F. RAILROADSITE PLAN KEYNOTES:0104020305EXISTING (4)-LEVEL PARKING STRUCTURE.EXISTING PARKING STALLS, TYP.EXISTING LANDSCAPING, TYP.NEW DOORSPARKING TABULATIONS:SADDLEBACK MAIN AUDITORIUM:9,375 SFPARKING REQUIRED: PARKING PROVIDED:833 STALLSC.U.P. 2014.05739TENANTSADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC.1 SADDLEBACK PARKWAYLAKE FOREST, CA 92630CONTACT: STEVE JOHNSON, CFOARCHITECT:ELEMENTS ARCHITECTURE6B LIBERTY, SUITE 100ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656(949) 488 - 0865, EXT. 11CONTACT: STEVE CAMP, AIA ARCHITECT, PRINCIPALBUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKDOWN:1ST FLOOR=27,600 SF2ND FLOOR= 8,830 SFFUTURE EXPANSION= 4,700 SF 41,130 SFBUILDING AREA:41,130 SQ. FT.LEGAL DESCRIPTION:PARCEL 2 OF PARCEL MAP 97-155BUILDING ADDRESS:2095 EAST KATELLA AVENUEANAHEIM, CA06NEW STAIRS AND WALKWAY.EXISTING STREET ENTRANCE, TYP.EXISTING FENCE, TYP.07EXISTING STAIRS, TYP.08EXISTING SIDEWALK, TYP.09EXIST. ELECTRICAL ROOM.10EXIST. RISER ROOM.11WORSHIP CENTER=273 STALLSLARGE MEETING ROOM 3 STALLSOFFICE 12 STALLS 288 STALLSEXIST.PARKINGSTRUCTURE(4 LEVELS)VICINITY MAPSITE:2095 EAST KATELLA AVENUEANAHEIM, CASANTA ANA FWY57, ORANGE FWYE KATELLA AVE.E KATELLA AVE.EXIST. DRIVEGA2BA2KA2AA2JA2HA2IA2FA2EA2CA2DA2080109060507030407030303195'-0"244'- 8 "84'-6"139'-4"25'-0"246'-8"22'-3"43'-3"65'-8"33'-3"16 6 ' - 0 " 69'-7"PROPERTYLINE, TYP.151515151413121187182672017208(EXIST. 401 STALLS - V.I.F.)02SADDLEBACKCHURCH ANAHEIMCAMPUS2095 E KATELLA AVE.ANAHEIM, CAEXIST. F.F. = 155.15'1010111010ATTACHMENT NO. 5 A2G - VIEW OF FENCESaddleback Church Anaheim Campus2095 EAST KATELLA, ANAHEIM, CA 92806October 21, 2014H - VIEW OF PARKING LOT, CARL'S JR. (LEFT), COMMUNITY BANK (BEYOND),TOWNEPLACE SUITES (RIGHT), & PROJECT BLDG. (RIGHT)C - VIEW OF TOWNEPLACE SUITESB - VIEW OF PARKING STRUCTURE & OFFICE BUILDING (BEYOND)A - VIEW OF TRASH ENCLOSURE, BUSINESS BLDG. (LEFT), AND SHOPPINGARCADE (RIGHT)D - VIEW OF TOWNEPLACE SUITESE - VIEW OF TOWNEPLACE SUITES (LEFT) ANDPROJECT BLDG. (RIGHT)F - VIEW OF COMMUNITY BANK (LEFT) ANDTOWNEPLACE SUITES (RIGHT)I - VIEW OF TOWNEPLACE SUITES (LEFT) &PROJECT BLDG. (RIGHT)J - VIEW OF PROJECT BLDG.K - VIEW OF SHOPPING ARCADE (BEYOND)& PROJECT BLDG. (RIGHT)EXISTING PHOTOS TRUENORTHA3PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN3/32"=1'-0"Saddleback Church Anaheim Campus2095 EAST KATELLA, ANAHEIM, CA 92806October 21, 2014PROJECT DIRECTORY:TENANTSADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC.1 SADDLEBACK PARKWAYLAKE FOREST, CA 92630CONTACT: STEVE JOHNSON, CFOARCHITECT:ELEMENTS ARCHITECTURE6B LIBERTY, SUITE 100ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656(949) 488 - 0865, EXT. 11CONTACT: STEVE CAMP, AIA ARCHITECT, PRINCIPALBUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKDOWN:1ST FLOOR=27,600 SF2ND FLOOR=8,830 SFFUTURE EXPANSION= 4,700 SF 41,130 SFEXIST. BUILDING AREA:36,430 SQ. FT.01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243LEGEND:EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN, TYP.NEW WALLS, TYP.EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE DEMOLISHED, TYP.PLANNORTH03040605080909101113141516202322212624141719(TYP.)(TYP.)18254338(TYP.)(TYP.)39(TYP.)39(TYP.)40(TYP.)41(TYP.)42(TYP.)0705063843(TYP.)NOTECLASSROOMS FOR WEEKEND SERVICES ONLY TRUENORTHA4PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN3/32"=1'-0"Saddleback Church Anaheim Campus2095 EAST KATELLA, ANAHEIM, CA 92806October 21, 2014PROJECT DIRECTORY:TENANTSADDLEBACK VALLEY COMMUNITY CHURCH, INC.1 SADDLEBACK PARKWAYLAKE FOREST, CA 92630CONTACT: STEVE JOHNSON, CFOARCHITECT:ELEMENTS ARCHITECTURE6B LIBERTY, SUITE 100ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656(949) 488 - 0865, EXT. 11CONTACT: STEVE CAMP, AIA ARCHITECT, PRINCIPALBUILDING SQUARE FOOTAGE BREAKDOWN:1ST FLOOR=27,600 SF2ND FLOOR=8,830 SFFUTURE EXPANSION= 4,700 SF 41,130 SFEXIST. BUILDING AREA:36,430 SQ. FT.01020304050607080910111213141516171819202122232425262728293031323334353637383940414243LEGEND:EXISTING WALLS TO REMAIN, TYP.NEW WALLS, TYP.EXISTING CONSTRUCTION TO BE DEMOLISHED, TYP.PLANNORTH27363435333231293037OPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOWOPEN TO BELOW40(TYP.)41(TYP.)4228NOTEYOUTH AND MINISTRY SPACEFOR WEEKEND SERVICES ONLY September 2014 PARKING AND CIR CULAT IO N ANALYSIS SADDLEBACK ANAHEIM CHURCH 2095 EAST KATELLA AVENUE ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Submitted to: City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Prepared by: LSA Associates, Inc. 20 Executive Park, Suite 200 Irvine, CA 92614 (949) 553-0666 Project No. AHM1401 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» i TABLE OF CONTENTS INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................. 1 Statement of Purpose ..................................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ........................................................................................................................ 1 Summary of Findings .................................................................................................................... 3 DATA COLLECTION ........................................................................................................................... 3 Parking Data Collection ................................................................................................................ 3 Traffic Data Collection .................................................................................................................. 4 ANALYSIS & FINDINGS..................................................................................................................... 4 Parking Adequacy Analysis .......................................................................................................... 4 Circulation Operations Analysis ................................................................................................... 8 CONCLUSION .................................................................................................................................... 21 FIGURES Figure 1: Project Location and Study Area ............................................................................................ 2 Figure 2: Peak Sunday Parking Accumulation ....................................................................................... 7 Figure 3: Peak Weeknight Parking Accumulation ................................................................................. 9 Figure 4: Sunday Turn Movement Volumes ........................................................................................ 10 Figure 5: Weeknight Turn Movement Volumes................................................................................... 11 Figure 6: Sunday Pedestrian and Bike Volumes .................................................................................. 13 Figure 7: Weeknight Pedestrian and Bike Volumes ............................................................................. 14 Figure 8: Sunday Plus Project Projected Vehicle Turn Volume Adjustment ....................................... 15 Figure 9: Weeknight Plus Project Projected Vehicle Turn Volume Adjustment ................................. 16 Figure 10: Sunday Plus Project Projected Queue ................................................................................. 19 Figure 11: Weeknight Plus Project Projected Queue ........................................................................... 20 TABLES Table A: Saddleback Anaheim Parking Accumulation – Sunday Morning ........................................... 5 Table B: Saddleback Anaheim Parking Accumulation – Weekday Evening ......................................... 6 Table C: Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue LOS and Delay ............................................................... 17 Table D: Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue Queue Analysis .............................................................. 18 APPENDICES A: PARKING ACCUMULATION ANALYSIS B: PARKING ACCUMULATION COUNTS C: TURN MOVEMENT COUNT DATA D: SYNCHRO SUMMARY SHEETS: EXISTING E: SYNCHRO SUMMARY SHEETS: PLUS PROJECT F: SYNCHRO QUEUE ANALYSIS SHEETS: EXISTING G: SYNCHRO QUEUE ANALYSIS SHEETS: PLUS PROJECT L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» 1 PARKING AND CIRCULATION ANALYSIS SADDLEBACK ANAHEIM CHURCH INTRODUCTION Statement of Purpose The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate parking demand/supply capacity and circulation flow operations as a result of the proposed relocation of the Saddleback Anaheim Church from its current location at City National Grove of Anaheim (The Grove) to 2095 East Katella Avenue, which is across the street from its current location. The analysis evaluates the parking and circulation conditions associated with peak church usage in conjunction with regularly scheduled Angels baseball games. Utilizing field observation and collected empirical data, LSA Associates, Inc. (LSA) analyzed both Existing and Plus Project scenarios for parking demand and traffic flow. Level of service (LOS) and queue analysis were conducted at specified intersections to determine whether significant circulation impacts would be created. Project Description Saddleback Church is an evangelical Christian church located in Lake Forest, California. The Saddleback Anaheim Church is a satellite church campus that allows residents in the Anaheim area to attend services at a local location. The Saddleback Anaheim Church currently holds its services at The Grove in Anaheim, which is located at 2200 East Katella Avenue. It currently hosts three Sunday services at 8:00 a.m., 9:30 a.m., and 11:15 a.m. In addition, the Saddleback Anaheim Church employs a total of nine full- and part-time employees who work regular business hours from 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday. Vehicular access to the current church site is provided along the south leg of the Stadium Crossing/ Katella Avenue signalized intersection. Area A in Figure 1 denotes the existing surface parking lot for church parking at The Grove. Church parking signage and lot attendants are present to direct church traffic into the designated parking lot as The Grove shares parking with Angels Stadium. The current designated parking for the church is barricaded to designate church and baseball attendee parking. The proposed project is a site relocation of the Saddleback Anaheim Church from The Grove to 2095 East Katella Avenue as seen on Figure 1. The proposed project site is currently a vacant building that was formerly occupied by Bally’s Fitness Center. The proposed hours of operation and projected attendees of church services are as follows: 400 attendees at a 6:00 p.m. Saturday service, 800 attendees at a 9:00 a.m. Sunday service, 800 attendees at an 11:00 a.m. Sunday service, and 400 attendees at a 6:00 p.m. Sunday service. In addition, there will be various weeknight meetings ranging from 6:30 p.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. The number of attendees at these weeknight meetings is expected to range from 5 to 100. E. Katella Ave.E. Katella Ave.State College Blvd.State College Blvd.FIGURE 1 I:\AHM1401\G\ProjLoc_StudyArea.cdr.cdr (9/18/14) Project Location and StudyArea Anaheim Saddleback Church SOURCE: Google Earth FEET 2501250 N C B D - Project Site - Proposed ParkingAreas - SaddlebackAnaheim of The Grove - Parking adjacent to future SaddlebackAnaheim site (Bally’s Fitness) - StudyArea Intersections LEGEND A B E A PROPOSED PROJECT SITE CURRENT PROJECT SITE E L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» 3 Vehicular access to the relocation site will be the north leg of the Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue signalized intersection, which is shared with an existing retail/commercial center. This intersection is expected to be the main ingress/egress driveway for the Saddleback Anaheim Church. It should be noted that an existing right-in/right-out driveway on the west side of the retail/commercial center turning onto State College Boulevard is also available for vehicular ingress and egress. Two main intersections are included in this study. The Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue signalized intersection has protected left-turn movements in each direction. Stadium Crossing is a north/south drive aisle that connects Angels Stadium to the south and a retail/commercial center to the north. Katella Avenue is an east/west arterial that is classified as a Stadium Area Smartstreet. The other study intersection is a three-way stop-controlled intersection north of Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue. The east/west street is a private drive aisle that connects two private parking lots. The northbound leg of the intersection is a free flow lane, and the eastbound, westbound, and southbound legs are stop-controlled lanes. Figure 1 illustrates the existing parking lots (Areas B, C, D, and E) proposed for use by the relocated Saddleback Anaheim Church. These lots are currently being used for event parking during the baseball season. Areas C and D are surface lots that supply 70 parking spaces and 46 spaces, respectively. Area B is a four-level parking structure that supplies 382 parking spaces. Area E is a 335 parking space surface lot that may be shared between the church and adjacent commercial uses. Field observation of Area E showed a demand for parking immediately adjacent to the existing retail/commercial uses. Ample parking is available to the north of Area E in the vicinity of the proposed church building. Church staff will be located in the private parking lots to direct patrons to their parking destinations and marshal traffic to minimize delay and congestion. A church staff parking management plan will be subject to review by City staff. Summary of Findings Based on field observations and data collection, the proposed relocation site is expected to adequately accommodate the anticipated parking demand and circulation impacts with the proposed relocation. The parking supply in Areas B, C, D, and E are sufficient to meet the peak existing parking demand of Saddleback Anaheim Church. The existing circulation operations have the capacity to sustain the volume shifts as a result of the proposed church relocation. The LOS along Katella Avenue remains unaffected, and the intersection would continue to operate satisfactorily. The local street and driveways associated with Stadium Crossing, however, would experience queue formation on Sundays, but the queues would remain contained within the private drive aisles, with minimal impact on city arterials. DATA COLLECTION Parking Data Collection LSA coordinated with an independent third-party data collection firm, National Data Services, Inc. (NDS), to collect parking accumulation data in the pre-determined study area (Figure 1). Parking accumulation counts were conducted every half-hour between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. on Sunday, August 10, 2014, when a regularly scheduled 12:30 p.m. Angels baseball game was scheduled. L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» 4 Parking accumulation counts were also conducted every half-hour between 5:00 p.m. and 11:00 p.m. on Tuesday, August 12, 2014. A regularly scheduled Angels game was scheduled for 7:05 p.m. that night. Parking counts were scheduled to coincide with church services and Angels games to determine the peak demand in a worst-case scenario. Parking accumulation counts were conducted for Area A to determine existing parking demand at Saddleback Anaheim Church. Parking accumulation counts were conducted in Areas B, C, D, and E to determine available parking supply and demand for the relocated church. Traffic Data Collection NDS also collected intersection turn-movement counts for vehicles, bicycles, and pedestrians at two intersections: Stadium Crossing /Katella Avenue and Stadium Crossing/first east-west drive aisle north of Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue. Counts were taken on Sunday, August 10, 2014, from 9:30 a.m. to 1:00 p.m. and on Tuesday, August 12, 2014, from 5:30 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. These counts were taken during peak arrivals and departures for church activities as well as peak arrivals for the Angels baseball game. ANALYSIS & FINDINGS Parking Adequacy Analysis Tables A and B detail the existing parking demand at The Grove (Area A) and the parking demand in Areas B, C, D, and E. To analyze the parking adequacy of the proposed church relocation, current parking demands in Areas B, C, D, and Ewere combined with the existing parking demand of Saddleback Anaheim Church at The Grove (Area A). The existing total parking supply in Areas B, C, D, and E totals 833 spaces. The peak parking demand at Saddleback Anaheim Church at The Grove on a Sunday is 263 spaces at 10:00 a.m. The total existing parking supply at the proposed relocation is 833 spaces. The demand at the location was observed at 114 parking spaces. The parking demand at the time of church relocation therefore becomes a combination of the existing church parking demand (Area A) and existing observed parking demand at the relocation site (Areas B, C, D, and E). After relocation, the expected parking demand at 10:00 a.m. would be 377 spaces while supply would remain at 833 spaces as shown on Figure 2. There would be an expected parking residual of 456 spaces. Although 10:00 a.m. represents the church parking demand peak hour, it does not represent the highest peak parking demand of the combined activities. The highest peak parking demand occurs at 12:00 p.m., as the second church service is ending and a majority of baseball attendees are arriving and seeking off-site event parking. At 12:00 p.m., the existing church parking demand is 259 spaces. The parking demand in Areas B, C, D, and E is 257 spaces. After the proposed church relocation, in a shared parking scenario, a total parking demand of 516 would be expected while supply would remain at 833 parking spaces. A residual of 317 spaces would remain at the peak demand of combined church and event utilization. LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Table A: Saddleback Anaheim Parking Accumulation - Sunday Morning Saddleback Anaheim at the Grove Parking Demand Parking Space Demand Parking Space Demand Parking Space Supply Parking Space Residual Parking Space Demand Parking Space Supply Parking Space Residual 7:00 AM 30 19 833 814 49 833 784 7:30 AM 49 25 833 813 74 833 759 8:00 AM 105 40 833 807 145 833 688 8:30 AM 130 56 833 792 186 833 647 9:00 AM 148 72 833 777 220 833 613 9:30 AM 196 89 833 760 285 833 548 10:00 AM 263 114 833 739 377 833 456 10:30 AM 228 152 833 714 380 833 453 11:00 AM 140 157 833 659 297 833 536 11:30 AM 247 186 833 654 433 833 400 12:00 PM 259 257 833 553 516 833 317 12:30 PM 176 300 833 546 476 833 357 1:00 PM 26 323 833 515 349 833 484 1:30 PM 14 299 833 510 313 833 520 2:00 PM 4 300 833 534 304 833 529 2:30 PM 2 289 833 533 291 833 542 3:00 PM 3 278 833 557 281 833 552 3:30 PM 3 213 833 601 216 833 617 4:00 PM 4 128 833 704 132 833 701 4:30 PM 4 110 833 749 114 833 719 5:00 PM 5 87 833 728 92 833 741 5:30 PM 5 74 833 752 79 833 754 6:00 PM 5 51 833 759 56 833 777 6:30 PM 6 60 833 783 66 833 767 7:00 PM 4 56 833 773 60 833 773 Parking Adjacent to Future Saddleback Anaheim Site (Bally's Fitness) Saddleback Anaheim at Bally's Fitness Parking Demand and Supply Legend Peak Parking Demand of Existing Saddleback Anaheim at The Grove Peak Parking Demand of Combined Proposed Church Relocation and Event Parking Usage Table A and B Parking Accumulation.xlsx\Final(9/17/2014) LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Table B: Saddleback Anaheim Parking Accumulation - Weekday Evening Saddleback Anaheim at the Grove Parking Demand Parking Space Demand Parking Space Demand Parking Space Supply Parking Space Residual Parking Space Demand Parking Space Supply Parking Space Residual 5:00 PM 12 173 833 660 185 833 648 5:30 PM 12 189 833 644 201 833 632 6:00 PM 10 255 833 578 265 833 568 6:30 PM 7 293 833 540 300 833 533 7:00 PM 6 344 833 489 350 833 483 7:30 PM 5 431 833 402 436 833 397 8:00 PM 4 421 833 412 425 833 408 8:30 PM 4 421 833 412 425 833 408 9:00 PM 4 405 833 428 409 833 424 9:30 PM 5 386 833 447 391 833 442 10:00 PM 4 327 833 506 331 833 502 10:30 PM 2 129 833 704 131 833 702 11:00 PM 1 46 833 787 47 833 786 Saddleback Anaheim at Bally's Fitness Parking Demand and Supply Parking Adjacent to Future Saddleback Anaheim Site (Bally's Fitness) Legend Peak Parking Demand of Existing Saddleback Anaheim at The Grove Peak Parking Demand of Combined Proposed Church Relocation and Event Parking Usage Table A and B Parking Accumulation.xlsx\Final(9/17/2014) E. Katella Ave.E. Katella Ave.State College Blvd.State College Blvd.- Project Site- Proposed ParkingAreasLEGEND- Utilized Parking Spaces/Available Parking Spaces## / ##Parking adjacent to futureSaddleback Anaheim site(Bally’s Fitness)Existing Demand:263 SpacesExisting Demand:263 SpacesFIGURE 2I:\AHM1401\G\ParkingAccumulation_Sunday.cdr (8/28/14)Peak Sunday ParkingAccumulationAnaheim Saddleback ChurchSOURCE: Google Earth (2014)FEET2501250NPROPOSED PROJECT SITECURRENT PROJECT SITEExisting Demand: 114/833 SpacesExisting Demand: 114/833 SpacesExisting + Project Use: 377/833 SpacesExisting + Project Use: 377/833 Spaces L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» 8 It should be noted that Areas B, C, and D are currently used as private commercial event parking lots. After the proposed relocation, event parking is expected to be prohibited from Areas B, C, and D. Saddleback Anaheim Church would be able to utilize the entire supply of parking spaces and would not need to accommodate event shared parking. Thus the elimination of shared event parking further ensures adequate parking supply for the peak demand of Saddleback Anaheim Church. Table B provides a parking accumulation of the study area during a typical weekday evening with a regularly scheduled evening Angels baseball game. At the church parking demand peak hour, only 12 parking spaces were utilized by the Saddleback Anaheim Church at 5:30 p.m. In Areas B, C,D, and E there was a demand of 189 parking spaces. A total parking supply demand of 201 spaces would be expected at the time of the proposed relocation as shown on Figure 3. A residual of 632 parking spaces would still remain available for use. The peak parking demand of the combined land uses occurs at 7:30 p.m., when Saddleback Anaheim Church utilizes 5 parking spaces, and Areas B, C, D, and E experience a parking demand of 431. A demand total of 436 is expected as a result of the combined uses, and a parking supply of 833 spaces is available, leaving a residual of 397 parking spaces at the peak demand of combined church and event utilization. Circulation Operations Analysis An analysis was completed to evaluate the Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue intersection delay, LOS, and queue formation for the expected shift in volumes that would result from the proposed church relocation. An intersection analysis was completed utilizing Synchro 8.0 to identify LOS, delay, and queue impacts. Three activity periods were identified on Sunday during the data collection for the analysis. The hourly turn volumes are provided on Figure 4. The three activity periods are as follows: • 9:30 a.m. to 10:30 a.m. – First church service arrival • 10:30 a.m. to 11:30 a.m. – First church service departure/second church service arrival • 12:00 p.m. to 1:00 p.m. – Second church service departure/baseball game arrival Review of the total volumes indicates that the peak hour occurring at the second church service departure and the baseball game arrival was the highest occurrence and therefore was only used for the analysis. One peak hour between 5:30 p.m. and 6:30 p.m. was identified for the weeknight analysis that captured the church midweek service arrival and the baseball game arrival peak hour. Figure 5 depicts turn movement volumes collected for this peak hour. E. Katella Ave.E. Katella Ave.State College Blvd.State College Blvd.- Project Site- Proposed ParkingAreasLEGEND- Utilized Parking Spaces/Available Parking Spaces## / ##Parking adjacent to futureSaddleback Anaheim site(Bally’s Fitness)FIGURE 3I:\AHM1401\G\ParkingAccumulation_week-night-Evening.cdr (9/18/14)Peak Weeknight ParkingAccumulationAnaheim Saddleback ChurchSOURCE: Google Earth (2014)FEET2501250NExisting Demand:12 SpacesExisting Demand:12 SpacesCURRENT PROJECT SITEPROPOSED PROJECT SITEExisting Demand: 189/833 SpacesExisting Demand: 189/833 SpacesExisting + Project Use: 201/833 SpacesExisting + Project Use: 201/833 Spaces FIGURE 4 I:\AHM1401\G\Peak Hour_Sunday.cdr (9/2/14) Sunday Turn Movement Volumes Anaheim Saddleback Church E. KATELLA AVE. Driveway Aisle Stadium Crossing0/0/0 0/0/0 1/1/10/0/10/15/190/0/062/76/5912/23/467/23/431/2/1 1/8/9 85/108/98 50/63/78 619/689/792 175/210/10142/62/4823/18/1431/43/5449/176/2264/20/2959/185/21259/79/93 535/605/750 191/202/166 XX/YY/ZZ XX YY - First Church ServiceArrival Period - First Church Service Departure/Second ServiceArrival ZZ - Period Second Church Service Departure/Baseball GameArrival Period LEGEND FIGURE 5 I:\AHM1401\G\Peak Hour_Weeknight.cdr (9/2/14) Weeknight Turn Movement Volumes Anaheim Saddleback Church E. KATELLA AVE. Driveway Aisle Stadium Crossing0 0 90354 8777781 21 91 168 961 138531370 1183312381 816 147 - Church Midweek ServiceArrival/Baseball GameArrival PeriodXX LEGEND L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» 12 Consistent with the City of Anaheim Traffic Impact Studies Guidelines, all operational parameters (e.g., lane capacities, peak-hour factor) were used. Minimum green times were estimated based on field observations. Pedestrian calls per hour based on data collection were utilized for the analysis as depicted on Figures 6 and 7. Based on field observations, pedestrians crossed the intersection in groups of 15 to 20. Pedestrian data were then adjusted to travel in groups of 20 to reflect field observations. For the Plus Project scenario, volume data were adjusted to reflect the proposed church relocation and the shift of departing vehicles. Traffic volumes were manually adjusted to reflect the shift of volumes from the south leg to the north leg of the intersection. Utilizing the parking demand data collected during the peak of the second church service departure and baseball game arrival, a total of 233 vehicles exited the parking lot on Sunday and 5 vehicles exited the parking lot on the weeknight. Existing turning splits for the northbound movements were used to assign the outbound volume. Volumes were then added to the affected leg after the proposed church relocation. The three-way stop-controlled intersection was analyzed as a four-way stop-controlled intersection, thereby providing a more conservative analysis. The Plus Project traffic volumes were manually adjusted to reflect the shifts in volumes on Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue. The traffic volumes were assigned 80 percent of vehicles arriving from the east parking structure (Area B) and 20 percent of vehicles arriving from the north surface parking lot (Area C). Figures 8 and 9 depict the methodology for Plus Project volume adjustments. Table C provides an LOS and delay comparison of the Existing and Plus Project scenarios for the proposed church relocation. The eastbound and westbound through and turn lanes on Katella Avenue would experience little or no delay and LOS change as a result of the volume shift with the proposed project. The northbound left-turn leg delay would be expected to decrease whereas the southbound left-turn leg would be expected to experience an increase in delay and queue formation because the volumes originating from the church would now be traveling southbound instead of northbound on Stadium Crossing. Delay and queues are expected to remain along Stadium Crossing but should dissipate quickly. Table D provides a queue formation comparison of the Existing and Plus Project scenarios. Figures 10 and 11 depict the average queue length and the queue length at the 95th confidence interval. The southbound left-turn leg would experience an increase in delay and queue formation as a result of the proposed relocation. On Sunday, an average queue length of 159 feet (or 7 vehicles) would be expected. On a weeknight, LOS for the southbound left-turn leg would remain the same after the proposed church relocation. An average queue length of 55 feet (or 2 vehicles) would be expected. Queues and delays would be expected to dissipate quickly because the number of pedestrians impeding traffic flow would significantly decrease due to the prohibition of event parking in Areas B, C, and D. The increase in volumes along the north leg of Stadium Crossing would cause an increased delay, but the peak period of delay would only occur within a limited period of time during church departures. These delay periods would be expected to cycle in a timely manner, and normal intersection delay and LOS would be expected to resume. To ensure the safety of pedestrian and vehicular movement on the project site, it is recommended that an intersection ground marking of “Keep Clear” be provided in the unsignalized drive aisle. FIGURE 6 I:\AHM1401\G\Ped-Bike Vols_Sunday.cdr (8/25/14) Sunday Pedestrian and Bike Volumes Anaheim Saddleback Church E. KATELLA AVE. Driveway Aisle Stadium Crossing- Pedestrian/Bike Period: Second Service Departure/Baseball GameArrival XX/YY LEGEND 5/0 42/0 66/0 1/0 26/2 273/1 118/3 127/5 FIGURE 7 I:\AHM1401\G\Ped-Bike Vols_Weeknight.cdr (9/2/14) Weeknight Pedestrian and Bike Volumes Anaheim Saddleback Church E. KATELLA AVE. Driveway Aisle Stadium Crossing- Church Midweek ServiceArrival/Baseball GameArrival Pedestrian/Bike Volumes XX/YY LEGEND 8/0 55/0 120/2 4/0 45/0 152/0 36/1 124/0 FIGURE 8 I:\AHM1401\G\Plus Proj_Sunday_TurnVolAdj.cdr (8/27/14) Sunday Plus Project Projected Vehicle Turn VolumeAdjustment Anaheim Saddleback Church E. KATELLA AVE. Driveway Aisle Stadium Crossing0 0 1+18=1871190+47=665946431 9 98 78 792 101481454+121=169+112=16622629212-121=105-112=10093 750 166 - Turn VolumesXX LEGEND FIGURE 9 I:\AHM1401\G\Plus Proj_Weeknight_TurnVolAdj.cdr (8/27/14) Weeknight Plus Project Projected Vehicle Turn VolumeAdjustment Anaheim Saddleback Church E. KATELLA AVE. Driveway Aisle Stadium Crossing0 0 9+4=131350+1=368777781 21 91 168 961 138531370 11833123-2=116-3=12081 816 147 - Turn VolumesXX LEGEND LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Table C: Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue LOS and Delay LOS Delay LOS Delay NBL F 232.1 E 61.5 NBT C 28.4 C 29.2 NBR C 27.8 C 28.6 SBL E 62.4 F 545.9 SBT C 33.3 C 29.7 SBR C 33.3 C 31.0 EBL D 54.3 D 54.3 EBT C 32.7 C 34.2 EBR C 27.9 C 29.0 WBL D 49.2 D 48.3 WBT C 30.1 C 30.8 WBR C 24.7 C 25.3 LOS Delay LOS Delay NBL E 69.7 E 68.2 NBT C 28.6 C 28.5 NBR C 27.9 C 27.9 SBL E 69.0 E 72.6 SBT C 30.3 C 30.3 SBR C 30.5 C 30.5 EBL E 59.7 E 29.7 EBT C 34.6 C 34.6 EBR C 28.6 C 28.6 WBL D 51.5 D 51.5 WBT C 29.7 C 29.7 WBR C 24.6 C 24.6 Existing Plus Project Sunday Weeknight Existing Plus Project Affected Turn Movements Legend P:\AHM1401\xls\Table C LOS and Delay.xlsx LSA ASSOCIATES, INC. Table D: Stadium Crossing/Katella Avenue Queue Analysis Average Queue Length (ft) Queue at 95th Confidence Interval (ft) Average Queue Length (ft) Queue at 95th Confidence Interval (ft) NBL 191 408 80 187 SBL 41 95 159 346 WBL 73 145 73 145 NBL 90 218 89 213 SBL 53 125 55 133 WBL 102 190 102 190 Sunday Weeknight Existing Plus Project P:\AHM1401\xls\Table D Queues.xlsx E. Katella Ave.E. Katella Ave.State College Blvd.State College Blvd.- Project Site-Average Queue Length = 159ft- Queue Length (95th Confidence Interval)= 346ftLEGENDQueue Length(95th Confidence Interval) = 346ftFIGURE 10I:\AHM1401\G\Projected Queue_Sunday-PlusProj.cdr (8/28/14)Sunday Plus ProjectProjected QueueAnaheim Saddleback ChurchSOURCE: Google Earth (2014)FEET150750NPROPOSED PROJECT SITEAverage Queue Length = 159ft E. Katella Ave.E. Katella Ave.State College Blvd.State College Blvd.FIGURE 11I:\AHM1401\G\Projected Queue_Weeknight-PlusProj.cdr (8/27/14)Weeknight Plus ProjectProjected QueueAnaheim Saddleback ChurchSOURCE: Google Earth (2014)FEET150750NPROPOSED PROJECT SITEQueue Length(95th Confidence Interval) = 133ftAverage Queue Length = 55ft- Project Site-Average Queue Length = 55ft- Queue Length (95th Confidence Interval) = 133ftLEGEND L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» 21 It should be noted that there is an additional existing right-out egress driveway along State College Boulevard that can also be utilized. For the purpose of this study, the additional driveway was not included in the analysis. The presence of the driveway, however, may alleviate delay along Stadium Crossing. Although the northbound and southbound left legs are expected to experience volume shifts, the current municipal road facilities are expected to support the shifted volumes. The current circulation operational facilities are adequate to ensure that traffic flowing eastbound and westbound along Katella Avenue would be minimally impacted, if at all. CONCLUSION This study provides an analysis of the parking and circulation impacts of the proposed relocation of the Saddleback Anaheim Church in conjunction with the demands of the Angels Stadium events. The existing parking supply at the proposed location is sufficient even at the peak parking demand in a worst-case shared event parking scenario. As shared event parking is expected to be prohibited after the proposed relocation, there would be adequate parking supply to meet the church’s parking demands. The proposed church relocation project is expected to shift traffic volume from arriving from the south to arriving from the north. The relocation of the church would have minimal impact on eastbound and westbound traffic along Katella Avenue. Southbound delay queues would be expected along Stadium Crossing. Overall, the parking availability and circulation operations along the Katella Avenue and Stadium Crossing are adequate to support the relocation of the Saddleback Anaheim Church in concurrence with the Angels Stadium events. L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» APPENDIX A PARKING ACCUMULATION ANALYSIS REGULAR PARKING Table ATable BTable CRemaining SpacesDemandSupplyResidualDemandSupplyResidualDemandSupplyResidualDemandSupplyResidualDemandSupplyResidual7:00 AM307:00 AM638237607070046467:00 AM3019833814784133353227:30 AM497:30 AM638237617069046467:30 AM4925833813764183353228:00 AM1058:00 AM638237627068046468:00 AM10540833807702323353178:30 AM1308:30 AM638237637067046468:30 AM13056833792662473353039:00 AM1489:00 AM638237637067046469:00 AM14872833777629633352889:30 AM1969:30 AM738237537067046469:30 AM196898337605647933527210:00 AM26310:00 AM10382372570650464610:00 AM2631148337394769933525610:30 AM22810:30 AM15382367570650464610:30 AM22815283371448613233523611:00 AM14011:00 AM36382346670640464611:00 AM14015783365951911533520311:30 AM24711:30 AM56382326870620464611:30 AM24718683365440712233522012:00 PM25912:00 PM1463822361270580464612:00 PM2592578335532949933521312:30 PM17612:30 PM1773822051170590464612:30 PM1763008335463701123352361:00 PM261:00 PM191382191157055046461:00 PM263238335154891173352231:30 PM141:30 PM191382191157055046461:30 PM14299833510496933352182:00 PM42:00 PM191382191157055046462:00 PM4300833534530943352422:30 PM22:30 PM191382191157055046462:30 PM2289833533531833352413:00 PM33:00 PM179382203147056046463:00 PM3278833557554853352523:30 PM33:30 PM134382248137057046463:30 PM3213833601598663352504:00 PM44:00 PM5638232677063046464:00 PM4128833704700653352694:30 PM44:30 PM1838236417069046464:30 PM4110833749745913352705:00 PM55:00 PM1238237027068046465:00 PM587833728723733352445:30 PM55:30 PM738237517069046465:30 PM574833752747663352626:00 PM56:00 PM738237517069046466:00 PM551833759754433352696:30 PM66:30 PM638237617069046466:30 PM660833783777533352927:00 PM47:00 PM638237617069046467:00 PM45683377376949335282Parking Accumulation - Sunday August 10, 2014Area A - Existing (The Grove) Area B - Parking Structure Area C Area DExisting Parking Demand at The GroveTotal Available Parking (Area B+C+D+E) Shared Parking Area E REGULAR PARKINGTable A Table BTable CRemaining SpacesDemand Supply Residual Demand Supply Residual Demand Supply ResidualDemand Supply Residual Demand Supply Residual5:00 PM 12 5:00 PM 78 382 304 10 70 60 6 46 40 5:00 PM 12 173 833 660 648 79 335 2565:30 PM 12 5:30 PM 73 382 309 7 70 63 4 46 42 5:30 PM 12 189 833 644 632 105 335 2306:00 PM 10 6:00 PM 108 382 274 22 70 48 3 46 43 6:00 PM 10 255 833 578 568 122 335 2136:30 PM 7 6:30 PM 167 382 215 27 70 43 2 46 44 6:30 PM 7 293 833 540 533 97 335 2387:00 PM 6 7:00 PM 213 382 169 30 70 40 2 46 44 7:00 PM 6 344 833 489 483 99 335 2367:30 PM 5 7:30 PM 324 382 58 34 70 36 2 46 44 7:30 PM 5 431 833 402 397 71 335 2648:00 PM 4 8:00 PM 324 382 58 34 70 36 2 46 44 8:00 PM 4 421 833 412 408 61 335 2748:30 PM 4 8:30 PM 324 382 58 32 70 38 2 46 44 8:30 PM 4 421 833 412 408 63 335 2729:00 PM 4 9:00 PM 314 382 68 29 70 41 2 46 44 9:00 PM 4 405 833 428 424 60 335 2759:30 PM 5 9:30 PM 303 382 79 24 70 46 2 46 44 9:30 PM 5 386 833 447 442 57 335 27810:00 PM 4 10:00 PM 249 382 133 21 70 49 2 46 44 10:00 PM 4 327 833 506 502 55 335 28010:30 PM 2 10:30 PM 69 382 313 6 70 64 2 46 44 10:30 PM 2 129 833 704 702 52 335 28311:00 PM 1 11:00 PM 4 382 378 2 70 68 2 46 44 11:00 PM 1 46 833 787 786 38 335 297Parking Accumulation -Tuesday August 12, 2014Total Available Parking (Area B+C+D+E)Shared Parking Area EExisting Parking Demand at The GroveArea A - Existing (The Grove) Area B - Parking Structure Area C Area D L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» APPENDIX B PARKING ACCUMULATION COUNTS Location: 2025 E Katella Ave, Anaheim, CA 92806 Day:Sunday City:Anaheim Date:8/10/14 Regular HC Unmarked Spaces 478 14 21 2 515 259 25 8 14 26 3 335 7:00 AM 17 1 1 5 0 6 30 10 0 0 2 1 0 13 7:30 AM 34 3 1 5 0 6 49 16 0 0 0 2 0 18 8:00 AM 86 6 2 5 0 6 105 26 0 2 3 0 1 32 8:30 AM 110 7 2 5 0 6 130 36 0 2 7 1 1 47 9:00 AM 126 9 2 5 0 6 148 54 0 1 6 1 1 63 9:30 AM 176 8 1 5 0 6 196 67 1 1 8 2 0 79 10:00 AM 240 11 1 5 0 6 263 85 0 3 8 1 2 99 10:30 AM 211 5 1 5 0 6 228 112 0 2 12 5 1 132 11:00 AM 121 6 2 5 0 6 140 97 0 4 8 6 0 115 11:30 AM 224 11 1 5 0 6 247 97 0 3 9 13 0 122 12:00 PM 237 10 1 5 0 6 259 85 0 1 9 4 0 99 12:30 PM 159 5 1 5 0 6 176 95 0 2 7 8 0 112 1:00 PM 22 0 1 1 0 2 26 93 0 3 11 10 0 117 1:30 PM 13 0 1 0 0 0 14 74 0 3 9 7 0 93 2:00 PM 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 76 0 2 9 7 0 94 2:30 PM 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 69 0 2 10 2 0 83 3:00 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 72 0 1 8 3 1 85 3:30 PM 2 0 1 0 0 0 3 52 0 0 8 4 2 66 4:00 PM 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 49 0 0 9 5 2 65 4:30 PM 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 73 0 1 8 7 2 91 5:00 PM 3 0 2 0 0 0 5 54 2 2 7 6 2 73 5:30 PM 4 0 1 0 0 0 5 49 0 2 10 4 1 66 6:00 PM 4 0 1 0 0 0 5 34 0 1 6 2 0 43 6:30 PM 5 0 1 0 0 0 6 37 0 2 9 4 1 53 7:00 PM 3 0 1 0 0 0 4 36 0 2 8 2 1 49 TOTALS 1810 82 29 61 0 74 2056 1548 3 42 191 107 18 1909 Notes:*The regular spots were posted as customer parking only with a one hour time limit. 2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 4TH FLOOR Regular Reserved Reserved Reserved Reserved HC Regular Regular Regular Regular Spaces 34 25 9 2 70 46 46 11 4 5 4 2 4 85 98 98 71 382 7:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 6 7:30 AM 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 6 8:00 AM 2 0 0 0 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 6 8:30 AM 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 6 9:00 AM 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 6 9:30 AM 2 1 0 0 3 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 2 1 2 0 7 10:00 AM 4 1 0 0 5 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 5 1 2 0 10 10:30 AM 4 1 0 0 5 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 8 4 2 0 15 11:00 AM 2 3 1 0 6 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 15 18 2 0 36 11:30 AM 2 5 1 0 8 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 26 25 3 1 56 12:00 PM 3 7 2 0 12 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 54 79 11 1 146 12:30 PM 3 6 2 0 11 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 54 85 35 1 177 1:00 PM 3 10 2 0 15 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 54 98 35 2 191 1:30 PM 2 11 2 0 15 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 54 98 35 2 191 2:00 PM 2 11 2 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 55 98 35 2 191 2:30 PM 2 11 2 0 15 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 55 98 35 2 191 3:00 PM 2 10 2 0 14 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 51 92 33 2 179 3:30 PM 2 9 2 0 13 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 42 67 23 1 134 4:00 PM 1 5 1 0 7 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 21 22 11 1 56 4:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 7 7 3 0 18 5:00 PM 0 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 4 4 3 0 12 5:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 7 6:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 2 2 0 7 6:30 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 6 7:00 PM 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 2 1 2 0 6 TOTALS 41 100 19 0 160 0 0 25 0 0 5 0 0 525 808 288 15 1666 Spaces 515 335 70 46 382 1348 7:00 AM 30 13 0 0 6 49 7:30 AM 49 18 1 0 6 74 8:00 AM 105 32 2 0 6 145 8:30 AM 130 47 3 0 6 186 9:00 AM 148 63 3 0 6 220 9:30 AM 196 79 3 0 7 285 10:00 AM 263 99 5 0 10 377 10:30 AM 228 132 5 0 15 380 11:00 AM 140 115 6 0 36 297 11:30 AM 247 122 8 0 56 433 12:00 PM 259 99 12 0 146 516 12:30 PM 176 112 11 0 177 476 1:00 PM 26 117 15 0 191 349 1:30 PM 14 93 15 0 191 313 2:00 PM 4 94 15 0 191 304 2:30 PM 2 83 15 0 191 291 3:00 PM 3 85 14 0 179 281 3:30 PM 3 66 13 0 134 216 4:00 PM 4 65 7 0 56 132 4:30 PM 4 91 1 0 18 114 5:00 PM 5 73 2 0 12 92 5:30 PM 5 66 1 0 7 79 6:00 PM 5 43 1 0 7 56 6:30 PM 6 53 1 0 6 66 7:00 PM 4 49 1 0 6 60 TOTALS 2056 1909 160 0 1666 5791 TOTALSBASEMENTRegularTOTALS ZONE C ZONE D 2 Hr ParkingRegular TOTALS ZONE A - The Grove/ Existing Saddleback Church Electric Car15 Minute 30 MinuteTOTALSUnmarkedHCRegular ZONE E - Shared Parking TOTALS TIME Prepared by National Data & Surveying Services Parking Study TIME A E C 1ST FLOOR ZONE B - Parking Structure TIME D B GRAND TOTALS ZONES HCBank Customers Fenced Lot Regular* LoadingHC Location: 2025 E Katella Ave, Anaheim, CA 92806Day:TuesdayCity:AnaheimDate:8/12/14Regular HC UnmarkedSpaces47814212515259258142633355:00 PM7 0 2 3 0 0 12 60 1 2 8 8 0 795:30 PM7 0 2 3 0 0 12 80 1 1 13 10 0 1056:00 PM5 0 2 3 0 0 10 91 1 0 18 10 2 1226:30 PM3 0 2 2 0 0 7 79 1 0 9 8 0 977:00 PM2 0 2 2 0 0 6 84 1 0 7 7 0 997:30 PM2 0 2 1 0 0 5 54 1 1 7 8 0 718:00 PM2 0 2 0 0 0 4 51 1 0 5 4 0 618:30 PM2 0 2 0 0 0 4 53 1 0 3 6 0 639:00 PM2 0 2 0 0 0 4 53 0 0 3 4 0 609:30 PM3 0 2 0 0 0 5 51 0 0 3 3 0 5710:00 PM2 0 2 0 0 0 4 48 0 0 2 5 0 5510:30 PM2 0 0 0 0 0 2 49 0 0 1 2 0 5211:00 PM1000001370001038TOTALS400221400767908879762959Notes: *The regular spots were posted as customer parking only with a one hour time limit.2ND FLOOR 3RD FLOOR 4TH FLOORRegularReservedReserved Reserved Reserved HCRegularRegularRegularRegularSpaces3425927046461145424859898713825:00 PM3 6 1 0 10 6 6 6 3 1 3 0 1 41 18 5 0 785:30 PM1 4 2 0 7 4 4 2 2 0 1 1 0 37 26 4 0 736:00 PM11 8 3 0 22 3 3 1 2 0 1 1 0 51 46 5 1 1086:30 PM13 10 4 0 27 2 2 1 2 0 2 1 0 58 84 18 1 1677:00 PM15 11 4 0 30 2 2 1 2 0 2 1 0 56 94 57 0 2137:30 PM18 11 5 0 34 2 2 1 0 0 1 1 0 54 98 98 71 3248:00 PM19 10 5 0 34 2 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 54 98 98 71 3248:30 PM19 10 3 0 32 2 2 1 0 0 2 0 0 54 98 98 71 3249:00 PM17 9 3 0 29 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 54 98 91 70 3149:30 PM15 7 2 0 24 2 2 1 0 0 0 0 0 48 97 89 68 30310:00 PM13 7 1 0 21 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 1 41 74 78 54 24910:30 PM4 1 1 0 6 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 0 13 17 20 18 6911:00 PM110022200000012104TOTALS1499534027833331611314525628506624252550Spaces515335704638213485:00 PM12 79 10 6 781855:30 PM12 105 7 4 732016:00 PM10 122 22 3 1082656:30 PM7 97 27 2 1673007:00 PM6 99 30 2 2133507:30 PM5 71 34 2 3244368:00 PM4 61 34 2 3244258:30 PM4 63 32 2 3244259:00 PM4 60 29 2 3144099:30 PM5 57 24 2 30339110:00 PM4 55 21 2 24933110:30 PM2 52 6 2 6913111:00 PM13822447TOTALS769592783325503896TIMEZONE A - The Grove/ Existing Saddleback ChurchZONE CZONE DZONE B - Parking StructureRegularElectric CarHC UnmarkedFenced LotTOTALS Regular*Bank CustomersTOTALSRegular 2 Hr Parking HC Loading TOTALSE CHC 15 Minute 30 MinuteBRegular TOTALSBASEMENT1ST FLOORDZONE E - Shared ParkingTOTALSGRAND TOTALSTIMEPrepared by National Data & Surveying ServicesParking StudyTIMEZONESA L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» APPENDIX C TURN MOVEMENT COUNT DATA Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1 0.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 9:30 AM 10 1 23 5 5 3 12 142 69 72 164 20 526 6 0 9:45 AM 6 1 17 9 10 8 16 142 51 45 142 8 455 7 1 10:00 AM 19 1 10 7 5 11 12 108 38 40 132 8 391 7 0 10:15 AM 14 1 9 10 3 20 19 143 33 18 181 14 465 12 0 10:30 AM 27 4 26 8 5 13 19 108 36 25 145 19 435 8 1 10:45 AM 79 7 91 13 3 24 13 155 45 35 180 12 657 9 1 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :155 15 176 52 31 79 91 798 272 235 944 81 2929 0 0 49 3 APPROACH %'s :44.80%4.34%50.87%32.10%19.14%48.77%7.84%68.73%23.43%18.65%74.92%6.43% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :1000 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :139 13 136 38 16 68 63 514 152 118 638 53 1948 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.741 CONTROL : 0.763 0.856 SundayProject ID: City: 14-1187-001 Anaheim EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.891 WESTBOUND 8/10/2014 0.407 NS/EW Streets: SOUTHBOUND Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing AM Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1 0.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :0 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 CONTROL : 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.0000.000 Project ID:14-1187-001 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/10/2014 Sunday Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1 0.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 11:00 AM 29 4 44 11 2 15 19 172 69 69 160 16 610 9 4 11:15 AM 41 5 24 11 8 10 28 170 52 81 204 16 650 11 2 11:30 AM 33 4 26 18 1 13 18 161 51 36 197 29 587 5 4 11:45 AM 45 5 22 15 6 12 23 151 39 36 184 22 560 9 1 12:00 PM 40 5 28 10 6 10 28 191 44 34 255 30 681 15 1 12:15 PM 39 7 33 15 3 4 26 222 46 24 212 13 644 14 2 12:30 PM 94 13 105 16 2 11 18 155 43 33 140 27 657 9 2 12:45 PM 53 4 46 13 3 23 21 182 33 10 185 8 581 11 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :374 47 328 109 31 98 181 1404 377 323 1537 161 4970 0 0 83 16 APPROACH %'s :49.93%6.28%43.79%45.80%13.03%41.18%9.23%71.56%19.22%15.98%76.05%7.97% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :1200 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :226 29 212 54 14 48 93 750 166 101 792 78 2563 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.941 CONTROL : 0.761 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.744 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave NOON Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.8580.551 Project ID:14-1187-001 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/10/2014 Sunday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 1 1 1 City: AM 68 16 38 AM NOON 48 14 54 NOON PM 0 0 0 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 53 78 0 1 638 792 0 3 1 63 93 0 118 101 0 1 3 514 750 0 1 152 166 0 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 139 13 136 AM NOON 226 29 212 NOON PM 0 0 0 PM 1 0.5 1.5 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 845 1066 0 809 971 0 729 1009 0 688 1016 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 00 122 0 286 116 South Leg 01574 2075 East Leg North Leg 0 1497 574 748 South Leg East Leg 288 281 467 00 West Leg 1987 West Leg 0 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 286 281 0 Northbound Approach 11:00 AM 1:00 PM 251 316 129 200 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 14-1187-001 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 9:30 AM 11:00 AM Day:Eastbound ApproachStadium Crossing and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 0 129 200 0 Signalized CONTROL 845 1066 0 Stadium CrossingAM Peak Hour Sunday Westbound ApproachAnaheim Date: 688 1016 1000 AM 1200 PM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:8/10/2014 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 9:30 AM 18 3 3 0 3 0 0 1 11 1 0 0 40 9:45 AM 17 2 1 0 2 0 1 0 24 0 0 0 47 10:00 AM 8 4 1 0 2 0 0 0 22 0 0 0 37 10:15 AM 19 3 2 0 3 0 0 0 28 0 0 0 55 10:30 AM 28 3 0 0 1 0 1 1 24 1 0 0 59 10:45 AM 16 6 3 0 6 0 0 1 36 0 0 0 68 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :106 21 10 0 17 0 2 3 145 2 0 0 306 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :77.37%15.33%7.30%0.00%100.00%0.00%1.33%2.00%96.67%100.00%0.00%0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :1000 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :71 16 6 0 12 0 1 2 110 1 0 0 219 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.805 CONTROL : NS/EW Streets: SOUTHBOUND Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing AM First East-West Drive Aisle NORTHBOUND 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) UTURNS First East-West Drive Aisle 0.250 WESTBOUND 8/10/2014 0.750 0.500 0.764 SundayProject ID: City: 14-1187-002 Anaheim EASTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :0 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 CONTROL : Project ID:14-1187-002 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/10/2014 Sunday 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) First East-West Drive AisleNS/EW Streets:First East-West Drive Aisle PM Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.0000.000 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 11:00 AM 17 7 7 0 5 0 0 5 25 0 0 0 66 11:15 AM 15 7 13 0 3 0 1 1 23 0 0 0 63 11:30 AM 19 12 18 0 6 0 0 3 29 0 0 2 89 11:45 AM 11 14 16 1 4 0 0 5 25 0 0 0 76 12:00 PM 17 15 14 0 3 0 0 5 26 1 0 0 81 12:15 PM 9 9 15 0 4 1 0 0 16 0 0 0 54 12:30 PM 19 18 9 0 5 0 0 2 26 0 0 0 79 12:45 PM 14 4 5 0 7 0 1 2 30 0 0 0 63 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :121 86 97 1 37 1 2 23 200 1 0 2 571 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :39.80%28.29%31.91%2.56%94.87%2.56%0.89%10.22%88.89%33.33%0.00%66.67% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :1115 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :62 48 61 1 16 0 1 14 103 1 0 2 309 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.868 CONTROL : Project ID:14-1187-002 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/10/2014 Sunday 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) First East-West Drive AisleNS/EW Streets:First East-West Drive Aisle NOON Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.9220.872 0.375 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.708 ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 0 1 0 City: AM 0 12 0 AM NOON 0 16 1 NOON PM 0 0 0 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 1 0 1 1 0 0 1 2 14 0 0 110 103 0 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 71 16 6 AM NOON 62 48 61 NOON PM 0 0 0 PM 0 1 0 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 71 62 0 1 3 0 113 118 0 8 76 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM Date: 8 76 1000 AM 1115 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:8/10/2014 First East-West Drive Aisle 71 62 0 Stadium CrossingAM Peak Hour Sunday Westbound ApproachAnaheim Day:Eastbound ApproachStadium Crossing and First East-West Drive Aisle , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 0 17 51 0 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) CONTROL Count Periods AM Start 14-1187-002 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 9:30 AM 11:00 AM 11:00 AM 1:00 PM 29 68 17 51 Total Volume Per Leg 79 West Leg 0 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 123 120 0 Northbound Approach South Leg East Leg 93 120 171 00 West Leg South Leg 0184 180 East Leg North Leg 0 9 216 291 00 12 0 123 17 Start: End: AM 9:30 11:00 N/S Street:NOON 11:00 13:00 PM NONE NONE DAY: AM 4 6 AM NOON 27 8 NOON PM 0 0 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 44 104 0 22 317 0 25 26 0 23 22 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 22 16 AM NOON 82 26 NOON PM 0 0 PME A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES Pedestrian Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing Katella Ave Sunday Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-001 E/W Street: DATE: 8/10/2014 W E S T L E G Start: End: AM 9:30 11:00 N/S Street:NOON 11:00 13:00 PM NONE NONE DAY: AM 0 2 1 NOON 0 2 0 PM 0 0 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 9 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 AM 0 5 0 NOON 0 2 1 PM 0 0 0 Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-001 E/W Street:W E S T L E GE A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES DATE: 8/10/2014 Bicycle Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing Katella Ave Sunday PROJECT#: N/S Street: E/W Street: DATE:DAY: CITY: A M PEDESTRIANS BIKES EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 9:30 AM 0 1 1 1 2 1 4 3 9:30 AM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 AM 1 1 3 4 2 0 8 2 9:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 10:00 AM 0 1 4 0 7 1 12 6 10:00 AM 0 0 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:15 AM 1 1 3 0 4 3 2 16 10:15 AM 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AM 0 0 3 3 2 12 7 13 10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 AM 3 4 12 13 10 6 4 9 10:45 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 5 8 26 21 27 23 37 49 TOTALS 0 6 0 1 2 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 N O O N PEDESTRIANS BIKES EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 11:00 AM 1 0 19 4 0 25 1 24 11:00 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 2 14 6 2 32 2 14 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11:30 AM 4 1 24 17 10 30 6 27 11:30 AM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 11:45 AM 4 5 16 0 2 82 2 21 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 8 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 4 1 11 10 5 74 8 34 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 15 2 25 6 2 95 8 37 12:15 PM 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 12:30 PM 4 0 30 10 13 66 8 12 12:30 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 23 3 0 18 3 17 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 32 11 162 56 34 422 38 186 TOTALS 2 2 1 0 3 0 0 10 4 0 2 1 NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES T I M E NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG Sunday8/10/2014 14-1187-001 Stadium Crossing Katella Ave T I M E SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG T I M ENORTH LEGT I M E Anaheim WEST LEG Start: End: AM 9:30 11:00 N/S Street:NOON 11:00 13:00 PM NONE NONE DAY: AM 6 2 AM NOON 0 5 NOON PM 0 0 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 2 2 0 21 44 0 0 0 0 7 2 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 1 14 AM NOON 21 61 NOON PM 0 0 PME A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES Pedestrian Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing First East-West Drive Aisle Sunday Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-002 E/W Street: DATE: 8/10/2014 W E S T L E G Start: End: AM 9:30 11:00 N/S Street:NOON 11:00 13:00 PM NONE NONE DAY: AM 0 0 0 NOON 0 0 0 PM 0 0 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 AM 0 3 0 NOON 0 0 0 PM 0 0 0 Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-002 E/W Street:W E S T L E GE A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES DATE: 8/10/2014 Bicycle Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing First East-West Drive Aisle Sunday PROJECT#: N/S Street: E/W Street: DATE:DAY: CITY: A M PEDESTRIANS BIKES EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 9:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9:45 AM 2 2 0 0 1 0 0 2 9:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:00 AM 0 0 0 7 6 5 0 0 10:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 10:15 AM 4 0 0 6 0 9 0 0 10:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:30 AM 0 0 1 1 0 7 0 0 10:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10:45 AM 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 10:45 AM 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 6 2 1 17 7 21 0 2 TOTALS 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 N O O N PEDESTRIANS BIKES EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 11:00 AM 0 0 4 6 0 4 0 0 11:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:15 AM 0 2 3 19 0 2 0 1 11:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 13 1 3 0 0 11:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 11:45 AM 0 0 3 13 1 6 0 1 11:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:00 PM 0 3 8 14 0 24 0 1 12:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:15 PM 0 2 10 21 0 11 0 0 12:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:30 PM 0 0 1 9 0 1 0 0 12:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 0 3 0 6 0 0 12:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 0 7 29 98 2 57 0 3 TOTALS 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 NB SB EB WB NB SB EB WB PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES T I M E NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG EAST LEG Sunday8/10/2014 14-1187-002 Stadium Crossing First East-West Drive Aisle T I M E SOUTH LEG EAST LEG WEST LEG T I M ENORTH LEGT I M E Anaheim WEST LEG Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1 0.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :0 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 CONTROL : 0.000 0.000 TuesdayProject ID: City: 14-1187-001 Anaheim EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.000 WESTBOUND 8/12/2014 0.000 NS/EW Streets: SOUTHBOUND Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing AM Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1 0.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 5:30 PM 29 9 42 14 4 12 14 206 28 43 232 49 682 7 4 5:45 PM 34 8 28 15 7 4 15 211 32 32 257 36 679 8 4 6:00 PM 21 3 26 16 1 16 32 196 42 28 238 41 660 18 2 6:15 PM 34 13 27 25 1 21 20 203 45 35 234 42 700 7 3 6:30 PM 34 26 61 14 4 22 21 178 41 32 213 25 671 7 4 6:45 PM 35 8 20 14 2 12 23 195 51 25 207 42 634 5 7 7:00 PM 37 5 16 13 1 11 22 142 41 38 164 21 511 10 9 7:15 PM 40 3 28 11 1 8 17 134 31 17 141 19 450 8 1 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :264 75 248 122 21 106 164 1465 311 250 1686 275 4987 0 0 70 34 APPROACH %'s :44.97%12.78%42.25%49.00%8.43%42.57%8.45%75.52%16.03%11.31%76.26%12.44% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :530 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :118 33 123 70 13 53 81 816 147 138 961 168 2721 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.972 CONTROL : 0.975 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.723 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.9670.856 Project ID:14-1187-001 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/12/2014 Tuesday Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1 0.5 1.5 1 1 1 1 3 1 1 3 1 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :0 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 CONTROL : 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave NOON Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.0000.000 Project ID:14-1187-001 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/12/2014 Tuesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 1 1 1 City: AM 0 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 0 NOON PM 53 13 70 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 0 0 168 1 0 0 961 3 1 0 0 81 0 0 138 1 3 0 0 816 1 0 0 147 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 0 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 0 NOON PM 118 33 123 PM 1 0.5 1.5 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 1132 0 0 1267 0 0 1044 0 0 1009 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 572274 0 298 0 0 South Leg 21760 0 East Leg North Leg 418 0 0 0 South Leg East Leg 0 0 0 282136 West Leg 0 West Leg 2276 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 0 0 298 Northbound Approach 0 0 7:30 PM 0 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 5:30 PM 14-1187-001 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM Day:Eastbound ApproachStadium Crossing and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 1009 0 0 282 Signalized CONTROL 530 PM 0 0 1132 Stadium CrossingAM Peak Hour Tuesday Westbound ApproachAnaheim Date: 0 0 Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:8/12/2014 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :0 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 CONTROL : 0.000 0.000 TuesdayProject ID: City: 14-1187-002 Anaheim EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) UTURNS First East-West Drive Aisle 0.000 WESTBOUND 8/12/2014 0.000 NS/EW Streets: SOUTHBOUND Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing AM First East-West Drive Aisle Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 5:30 PM 31 22 14 1 8 0 0 4 14 5 99 5:45 PM 21 9 18 2 8 0 0 4 22 0 84 6:00 PM 20 24 16 0 7 0 0 3 20 2 92 6:15 PM 15 22 30 1 12 0 1 10 35 2 128 6:30 PM 17 19 31 1 7 0 3 3 25 3 109 6:45 PM 20 15 30 2 4 0 0 3 27 1 102 7:00 PM 18 5 18 1 3 0 0 7 19 0 71 7:15 PM 14 2 11 0 1 2 0 3 20 1 54 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :156 118 168 8 50 2 4 37 182 14 0 0 739 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :35.29%26.70%38.01%13.33%83.33%3.33%1.79%16.59%81.61%100.00%0.00%0.00% nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :600 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :72 80 107 4 30 0 4 19 107 8 0 0 431 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.842 CONTROL : 0.667 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.654 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) First East-West Drive AisleNS/EW Streets:First East-West Drive Aisle PM Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.7070.966 Project ID:14-1187-002 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/12/2014 Tuesday Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB TOTAL VOLUMES :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0!#DIV/0! nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :0 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.000 CONTROL : 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) First East-West Drive AisleNS/EW Streets:First East-West Drive Aisle NOON Stadium Crossing Stadium Crossing 0.0000.000 Project ID:14-1187-002 City:Anaheim UTURNS 8/12/2014 Tuesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 0 1 0 City: AM 0 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 0 NOON PM 0 30 4 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 4 0 0 8 0 1 0 0 19 0 0 0 107 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 0 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 0 NOON PM 72 80 107 PM 0 1 0 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 72 0 0 8 0 0 130 0 0 130 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 404259 0 145 0 0 South Leg 2020 0 East Leg North Leg 118 0 0 0 South Leg East Leg 0 0 0 8434 West Leg 0 West Leg 138 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 0 0 145 Northbound Approach 0 0 7:30 PM 0 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 5:30 PM 14-1187-002 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM Day:Eastbound ApproachStadium Crossing and First East-West Drive Aisle , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 130 0 0 84 3-Way Stop (SB/EB/WB) CONTROL 600 PM 0 0 72 Stadium CrossingAM Peak Hour Tuesday Westbound ApproachAnaheim Date: 0 0 Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:8/12/2014 First East-West Drive Aisle Start: End: AM NONE NONE N/S Street:NOON NONE NONE PM 17:30 19:30 DAY: AM 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 NOON PM 49 13 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 179 0 0 341 0 0 22 0 0 26 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 NOON PM 53 8 PME A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES Pedestrian Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing Katella Ave Tuesday Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-001 E/W Street: DATE: 8/12/2014 W E S T L E G Start: End: AM NONE NONE N/S Street:NOON NONE NONE PM 17:30 19:30 DAY: AM 0 0 0 NOON 0 0 0 PM 0 3 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 AM 0 0 0 NOON 0 0 0 PM 0 0 1 Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-001 E/W Street:W E S T L E GE A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES DATE: 8/12/2014 Bicycle Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing Katella Ave Tuesday PROJECT#: N/S Street: E/W Street: DATE:DAY: CITY: P M PEDESTRIANS BIKES EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 5:30 PM 8 6 3 4 8 12 5 9 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 4 0 7 9 4 28 7 29 5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 7 6 3 0 0 27 9 24 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 11 3 9 1 2 71 11 30 6:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 23 8 17 3 15 124 2 90 6:30 PM 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 13 2 4 3 3 82 7 30 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 7:00 PM 2 0 23 1 6 64 2 29 7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 PM 0 1 0 0 3 44 4 13 7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 68 26 66 21 41 452 47 254 TOTALS 0 1 1 0 3 0 0 3 1 0 1 0 WBSB PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES Tuesday8/12/2014 14-1187-001 Stadium Crossing Katella Ave EAST LEG T I M E Anaheim WEST LEG EBT I M E NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG NB Start: End: AM NONE NONE N/S Street:NOON NONE NONE PM 17:30 19:30 DAY: AM 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 NOON PM 0 1 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 4 0 0 88 0 0 0 0 0 7 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 0 0 AM NOON 0 0 NOON PM 18 94 PME A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES Pedestrian Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing First East-West Drive Aisle Tuesday Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-002 E/W Street: DATE: 8/12/2014 W E S T L E G Start: End: AM NONE NONE N/S Street:NOON NONE NONE PM 17:30 19:30 DAY: AM 0 0 0 NOON 0 0 0 PM 0 0 0 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 AM 0 0 0 NOON 0 0 0 PM 1 0 0 Anaheim S O U T H L E G PROJECT#: 14-1187-002 E/W Street:W E S T L E GE A S T L E GN O R T H L E G PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES DATE: 8/12/2014 Bicycle Count Peak Hour CITY: Stadium Crossing First East-West Drive Aisle Tuesday PROJECT#: N/S Street: E/W Street: DATE:DAY: CITY: P M PEDESTRIANS BIKES EB WB EB WB NB SB NB SB NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR 5:30 PM 0 7 4 9 0 0 0 0 5:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 5:45 PM 0 0 8 26 0 10 0 4 5:45 PM 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:00 PM 0 1 6 39 0 11 0 0 6:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:15 PM 0 0 2 26 2 32 0 0 6:15 PM 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:30 PM 0 0 4 20 2 15 0 2 6:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 6:45 PM 0 0 6 9 3 30 0 2 6:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 7:00 PM 1 0 5 11 1 12 0 0 7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7:15 PM 1 0 0 10 0 6 0 0 7:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 TOTALS 2 8 35 150 8 116 0 8 TOTALS 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 WBSB PREPARED BY NATIONAL DATA & SURVEYING SERVICES Tuesday8/12/2014 14-1187-002 Stadium Crossing First East-West Drive Aisle EAST LEG T I M E Anaheim WEST LEG EBT I M E NORTH LEG SOUTH LEG NB L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» APPENDIX D SYNCHRO SUMMARY SHEETS: EXISTING HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Sunday Existing Sunday 12:00 pm 8/10/2014 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 93 750 166 101 792 78 226 29 212 54 14 48 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.89 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1430 1373 1615 1700 1445 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1430 1373 1615 1700 1445 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 750 166 101 792 78 226 29 212 54 14 48 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 110 0 0 49 0 62 79 0 0 36 Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 750 56 101 792 29 226 60 40 54 14 12 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.8 40.4 40.4 16.4 44.0 44.0 16.0 40.0 40.0 7.2 31.2 31.2 Effective Green, g (s) 12.8 40.4 40.4 16.4 44.0 44.0 16.0 40.0 40.0 7.2 31.2 31.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.34 0.34 0.14 0.37 0.37 0.13 0.33 0.33 0.06 0.26 0.26 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 1531 486 220 1666 529 215 476 457 96 442 375 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.16 0.06 c0.17 c0.14 c0.04 0.03 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.02 0.03 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.49 0.11 0.46 0.48 0.05 1.05 0.13 0.09 0.56 0.03 0.03 Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 31.6 27.5 47.7 29.1 24.6 52.0 27.8 27.5 54.9 33.1 33.1 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 1.1 0.5 1.5 1.0 0.2 180.1 0.5 0.4 7.5 0.1 0.2 Delay (s) 54.3 32.7 27.9 49.2 30.1 24.7 232.1 28.4 27.8 62.4 33.3 33.3 Level of Service D C C D C C F C C E C C Approach Delay (s) 33.9 31.7 126.8 46.9 Approach LOS C C F D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 50.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.47 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 85.0% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Stadium Crossing & Driveway Aisle Sunday Existing Sunday 12:00 pm 8/10/2014 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 1 9 98 1 0 0 0 19 1 59 46 43 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 9 98 1 0 0 0 19 1 59 46 43 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SE 1 NW 1 Volume Total (vph) 108 1 20 148 Volume Left (vph) 1 1 0 59 Volume Right (vph) 98 0 1 43 Hadj (s) -0.54 0.20 -0.03 -0.09 Departure Headway (s) 3.7 4.6 4.2 4.0 Degree Utilization, x 0.11 0.00 0.02 0.17 Capacity (veh/h) 925 742 819 861 Control Delay (s) 7.2 7.6 7.3 7.8 Approach Delay (s) 7.2 7.6 7.3 7.8 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 7.5 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 28.2% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Weekday Night Existing Weekday Night 5:30 pm 8/12/2014 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 81 816 147 138 961 168 118 33 123 70 13 53 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1471 1373 1615 1700 1445 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1471 1373 1615 1700 1445 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 816 147 138 961 168 118 33 123 70 13 53 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 99 0 0 78 0 32 51 0 0 37 Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 816 48 138 961 90 118 49 25 70 13 16 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.2 39.2 39.2 17.6 46.6 46.6 12.0 39.2 39.2 8.0 35.2 35.2 Effective Green, g (s) 10.2 39.2 39.2 17.6 46.6 46.6 12.0 39.2 39.2 8.0 35.2 35.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.15 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 137 1486 472 236 1764 561 161 480 448 107 498 423 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.18 c0.09 c0.21 c0.07 c0.03 0.04 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.55 0.10 0.58 0.54 0.16 0.73 0.10 0.05 0.65 0.03 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 52.9 33.1 28.1 47.8 28.5 23.9 52.4 28.1 27.7 54.7 30.2 30.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 1.5 0.4 3.7 1.2 0.6 17.2 0.4 0.2 14.3 0.1 0.2 Delay (s) 59.7 34.6 28.6 51.5 29.7 24.6 69.7 28.6 27.9 69.0 30.3 30.5 Level of Service E C C D C C E C C E C C Approach Delay (s) 35.7 31.4 46.1 50.3 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Stadium Crossing & Driveway Aisle Weekday Night Existing Weekday Night 5:30 pm 8/12/2014 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 1 21 91 9 0 0 4 35 0 87 77 78 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 21 91 9 0 0 4 35 0 87 77 78 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SE 1 NW 1 Volume Total (vph) 113 9 39 242 Volume Left (vph) 1 9 4 87 Volume Right (vph) 91 0 0 78 Hadj (s) -0.48 0.20 0.02 -0.12 Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.8 4.4 4.1 Degree Utilization, x 0.13 0.01 0.05 0.27 Capacity (veh/h) 835 686 769 854 Control Delay (s) 7.6 7.9 7.7 8.6 Approach Delay (s) 7.6 7.9 7.7 8.6 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 8.2 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 33.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» APPENDIX E SYNCHRO SUMMARY SHEETS: PLUS PROJECT HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Sunday Plus Project Sunday 12:00 pm 8/10/2014 Plus Project Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 93 750 166 101 792 78 105 29 100 166 14 169 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1478 1373 1615 1700 1445 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1478 1373 1615 1700 1445 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 93 750 166 101 792 78 105 29 100 166 14 169 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 112 0 0 50 0 26 42 0 0 118 Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 750 54 101 792 28 105 41 20 166 14 51 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 12.8 38.8 38.8 17.2 43.2 43.2 12.0 38.0 38.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Effective Green, g (s) 12.8 38.8 38.8 17.2 43.2 43.2 12.0 38.0 38.0 10.0 36.0 36.0 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.11 0.32 0.32 0.14 0.36 0.36 0.10 0.32 0.32 0.08 0.30 0.30 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 172 1471 467 231 1635 520 161 468 434 134 510 433 v/s Ratio Prot c0.06 0.16 c0.06 c0.17 0.07 0.03 c0.10 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.04 0.02 0.01 c0.04 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.11 0.44 0.48 0.05 0.65 0.09 0.05 1.24 0.03 0.12 Uniform Delay, d1 50.8 32.9 28.5 47.0 29.8 25.1 52.0 28.8 28.4 55.0 29.6 30.5 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 3.5 1.3 0.5 1.3 1.0 0.2 9.5 0.4 0.2 490.9 0.1 0.6 Delay (s) 54.3 34.2 29.0 48.3 30.8 25.3 61.5 29.2 28.6 545.9 29.7 31.0 Level of Service D C C D C C E C C F C C Approach Delay (s) 35.2 32.2 43.5 275.9 Approach LOS D C D F Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 67.6 HCM 2000 Level of Service E HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.43 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Stadium Crossing & Driveway Aisle Sunday Plus Project Sunday 12:00 pm 8/10/2014 Plus Project Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 1 9 98 187 0 0 0 66 1 59 46 43 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 9 98 187 0 0 0 66 1 59 46 43 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SE 1 NW 1 Volume Total (vph) 108 187 67 148 Volume Left (vph) 1 187 0 59 Volume Right (vph) 98 0 1 43 Hadj (s) -0.54 0.20 -0.01 -0.09 Departure Headway (s) 4.1 4.7 4.8 4.6 Degree Utilization, x 0.12 0.25 0.09 0.19 Capacity (veh/h) 820 718 694 736 Control Delay (s) 7.7 9.3 8.2 8.7 Approach Delay (s) 7.7 9.3 8.2 8.7 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 8.6 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 38.7% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 HCM Signalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Weekday Night Plus Project Weekday Night 5:30 pm 8/12/2014 Plus Project Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Configurations Volume (vph) 81 816 147 138 961 168 116 33 120 73 13 55 Ideal Flow (vphpl) 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 1700 Total Lost time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Lane Util. Factor 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.91 1.00 1.00 0.95 0.95 1.00 1.00 1.00 Frt 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 1.00 0.91 0.85 1.00 1.00 0.85 Flt Protected 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (prot) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1474 1373 1615 1700 1445 Flt Permitted 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 0.95 1.00 1.00 Satd. Flow (perm) 1615 4550 1445 1615 4544 1445 1615 1474 1373 1615 1700 1445 Peak-hour factor, PHF 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Adj. Flow (vph) 81 816 147 138 961 168 116 33 120 73 13 55 RTOR Reduction (vph) 0 0 99 0 0 78 0 31 50 0 0 39 Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 816 48 138 961 90 116 48 24 73 13 16 Heavy Vehicles (%) 0% 2% 0% 0% 2% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% 0% Bus Blockages (#/hr) 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Turn Type Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Prot NA Perm Protected Phases 7 4 3 8 5 2 1 6 Permitted Phases 4 8 2 6 Actuated Green, G (s) 10.2 39.2 39.2 17.6 46.6 46.6 12.0 39.2 39.2 8.0 35.2 35.2 Effective Green, g (s) 10.2 39.2 39.2 17.6 46.6 46.6 12.0 39.2 39.2 8.0 35.2 35.2 Actuated g/C Ratio 0.08 0.33 0.33 0.15 0.39 0.39 0.10 0.33 0.33 0.07 0.29 0.29 Clearance Time (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 4.0 Vehicle Extension (s) 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 3.0 Lane Grp Cap (vph) 137 1486 472 236 1764 561 161 481 448 107 498 423 v/s Ratio Prot 0.05 0.18 c0.09 c0.21 c0.07 c0.03 0.05 0.01 v/s Ratio Perm 0.03 0.06 0.02 0.01 v/c Ratio 0.59 0.55 0.10 0.58 0.54 0.16 0.72 0.10 0.05 0.68 0.03 0.04 Uniform Delay, d1 52.9 33.1 28.1 47.8 28.5 23.9 52.4 28.1 27.7 54.8 30.2 30.3 Progression Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Incremental Delay, d2 6.9 1.5 0.4 3.7 1.2 0.6 15.9 0.4 0.2 17.8 0.1 0.2 Delay (s) 59.7 34.6 28.6 51.5 29.7 24.6 68.2 28.5 27.9 72.6 30.3 30.5 Level of Service E C C D C C E C C E C C Approach Delay (s) 35.7 31.4 45.5 52.2 Approach LOS D C D D Intersection Summary HCM 2000 Control Delay 35.5 HCM 2000 Level of Service D HCM 2000 Volume to Capacity ratio 0.42 Actuated Cycle Length (s) 120.0 Sum of lost time (s) 16.0 Intersection Capacity Utilization 86.7% ICU Level of Service E Analysis Period (min) 60 c Critical Lane Group HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis 2: Stadium Crossing & Driveway Aisle Weekday Night Plus Project Weekday Night 5:30 pm 8/12/2014 Plus Project Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR SEL SET SER NWL NWT NWR Lane Configurations Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Volume (vph) 1 21 91 13 0 0 4 36 0 87 77 78 Peak Hour Factor 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 1.00 Hourly flow rate (vph) 1 21 91 13 0 0 4 36 0 87 77 78 Direction, Lane # EB 1 WB 1 SE 1 NW 1 Volume Total (vph) 113 13 40 242 Volume Left (vph) 1 13 4 87 Volume Right (vph) 91 0 0 78 Hadj (s) -0.48 0.20 0.02 -0.12 Departure Headway (s) 4.1 4.8 4.4 4.1 Degree Utilization, x 0.13 0.02 0.05 0.28 Capacity (veh/h) 833 685 766 851 Control Delay (s) 7.6 7.9 7.7 8.7 Approach Delay (s) 7.6 7.9 7.7 8.7 Approach LOS A A A A Intersection Summary Delay 8.3 Level of Service A Intersection Capacity Utilization 34.3% ICU Level of Service A Analysis Period (min) 60 L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» APPENDIX F SYNCHRO QUEUE ANALYSIS SHEETS: EXISTING Queues 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Sunday Existing Sunday 12:00 pm 8/10/2014 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 750 166 101 792 78 226 122 119 54 14 48 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.49 0.28 0.46 0.48 0.13 1.05 0.22 0.22 0.45 0.03 0.10 Control Delay 63.2 33.1 5.6 55.1 30.6 1.9 230.2 10.5 6.2 65.8 33.4 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.2 33.1 5.6 55.1 30.6 1.9 230.2 10.5 6.2 65.8 33.4 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 166 0 73 169 0 ~191 16 0 41 8 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 139 246 67 145 252 21 #408 78 57 95 28 0 Internal Link Dist (ft) 309 634 309 118 Turn Bay Length (ft) 222 280 465 119 114 60 126 36 Base Capacity (vph) 171 1532 596 220 1667 605 215 590 585 121 510 542 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.49 0.28 0.46 0.48 0.13 1.05 0.21 0.20 0.45 0.03 0.09 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Queues 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Weekday Night Existing Weekday Night 5:30 pm 8/12/2014 Existing Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 816 147 138 961 168 118 81 75 70 13 53 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.56 0.26 0.58 0.55 0.26 0.73 0.15 0.14 0.52 0.03 0.10 Control Delay 60.6 35.7 6.0 58.9 30.9 9.2 82.1 14.8 1.9 67.9 30.0 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 35.7 6.0 58.9 30.9 9.2 82.1 14.8 1.9 67.9 30.0 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 189 0 102 216 21 90 18 0 53 7 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 125 275 63 190 312 92 #218 68 20 #125 25 1 Internal Link Dist (ft) 309 634 309 118 Turn Bay Length (ft) 222 280 465 119 114 60 126 36 Base Capacity (vph) 170 1456 562 236 1763 638 161 550 561 134 538 538 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.56 0.26 0.58 0.55 0.26 0.73 0.15 0.13 0.52 0.02 0.10 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C .L S A A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4S E P T E M B E R 2 0 1 4 P A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A TP A R K I N G A N D C I R C U L A T I O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I SI O N A N A L Y S I S S A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M CS A D D L E B A C K A N A H E I M C H U R C HH U R C HH U R C HH U R C H A N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I AA N A H E I M , C A L I F O R N I A P:\AHM1401\Document\Saddleback Anaheim Church 2.docx «09/19/14» APPENDIX G SYNCHRO QUEUE ANALYSIS SHEETS: PLUS PROJECT Queues 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Sunday Plus Project Sunday 12:00 pm 8/10/2014 Plus Project Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 93 750 166 101 792 78 105 67 62 166 14 169 v/c Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.29 0.44 0.48 0.14 0.65 0.14 0.12 1.24 0.03 0.31 Control Delay 63.2 34.4 5.8 53.7 31.2 5.8 73.1 15.7 0.5 536.2 30.0 6.2 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 63.2 34.4 5.8 53.7 31.2 5.8 73.1 15.7 0.5 536.2 30.0 6.2 Queue Length 50th (ft) 70 171 0 73 171 0 80 16 0 ~159 8 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 141 246 67 145 249 40 #187 61 8 #346 27 70 Internal Link Dist (ft) 309 634 309 118 Turn Bay Length (ft) 222 280 465 119 114 60 126 36 Base Capacity (vph) 172 1471 579 230 1634 572 161 518 536 134 538 573 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.54 0.51 0.29 0.44 0.48 0.14 0.65 0.13 0.12 1.24 0.03 0.29 Intersection Summary ~ Volume exceeds capacity, queue is theoretically infinite. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. Queues 1: Stadium Crossing & Katella Ave Weekday Night Plus Project Weekday Night 5:30 pm 8/12/2014 Plus Project Synchro 8 Report Page 1 Lane Group EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR Lane Group Flow (vph) 81 816 147 138 961 168 116 79 74 73 13 55 v/c Ratio 0.48 0.56 0.26 0.58 0.55 0.26 0.72 0.15 0.14 0.54 0.03 0.11 Control Delay 60.6 35.7 6.0 58.9 30.9 9.2 80.5 15.1 1.7 69.4 30.0 0.4 Queue Delay 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 Total Delay 60.6 35.7 6.0 58.9 30.9 9.2 80.5 15.1 1.7 69.4 30.0 0.4 Queue Length 50th (ft) 60 189 0 102 216 21 89 18 0 55 7 0 Queue Length 95th (ft) 125 275 63 190 312 92 #213 68 18 #133 25 2 Internal Link Dist (ft) 309 634 309 118 Turn Bay Length (ft) 222 280 465 119 114 60 126 36 Base Capacity (vph) 170 1456 562 236 1763 638 161 550 561 134 538 538 Starvation Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Spillback Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Storage Cap Reductn 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Reduced v/c Ratio 0.48 0.56 0.26 0.58 0.55 0.26 0.72 0.14 0.13 0.54 0.02 0.10 Intersection Summary # 95th percentile volume exceeds capacity, queue may be longer. Queue shown is maximum after two cycles. 1 Elaine Thienprasiddhi From:Jaryn Delano <jaryndelano@gmail.com> Sent:Saturday, October 25, 2014 11:44 AM To:Elaine Thienprasiddhi Subject:Comments on Project for Church: Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05739 Hello Elaine Thienprasiddhi, I received a notice regarding the planning commission's consideration of a project in my neighborhood at 2095 E Katella Ave for a church within a commercial building at a retail and office center. My official comments are below: "I am a homeowner within the Stadium Lofts condominium complex and have lived in the Platinum Triangle since August 2009. I have witnessed the gym that used to occupy the space at 2095 E Katella Ave close, and have watched the building remain empty ever since. Although I am eager to see development in the area, I do not support the project for the church because I do not believe the project is in line with the environment that Platinum Triangle was intended to offer. The property is in close proximity to the Stadium Lofts (across the street) as well as several other apartment buildings in the area. In order for Platinum Triangle to be successful, there needs to be businesses that will draw crowds at all days of the week into the area. The successful Anaheim Packing District is an example of that. Platinum Triangle needs more businesses that offer entertainment and dining options, which will help generate more revenue for Anaheim. Many areas of Anaheim have recovered from the pricing woes of the housing downturn. The Platinum Triangle, on the other hand, has struggled in comparison. When I purchased my condo, I purchased it for $330000. A recent appraisal a few months ago estimated the value at $280000. A lot of the reasons for the lack of recovery is the lack of development in the area. With stalled projects such as Lennar's A-Town on hold, the last thing the Platinum Triangle needs is an entity taking over a large, already-developed portion of the Platinum Triangle that will not draw much additional revenue to the city and residents. As a resident whose life will actually be impacted by this project, I cannot support a church project at 2095 E Katella Ave at this time. I believe the existing weekly use/rental of the facilities at "The Grove" nearby for Sunday church activities is already sufficient." Thank you, Jaryn Delano ATTACHMENT NO. 7 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2014-147 LOCATION: 3321 – 3325 East La Palma Avenue APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Mark Lewis with Panattoni Development Company, Inc. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a tentative parcel map to establish a five lot industrial subdivision. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that previously-certified Environmental Impact Report No. 317 is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request, and approving Tentative Parcel Map No. 2014-147. BACKGROUND: The 24-acre vacant property is located in the Northeast Area Specific Plan, Development Area 3 - La Palma Core Area (SP94-1, DA 3) zone. The site is designated for Industrial land uses by the General Plan. Surrounding land uses include industrial buildings to the north, east, and south, and a vacant property to the west. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to subdivide the property to create a five lot industrial subdivision to allow the independent sale of five future industrial buildings to be constructed on the property. The applicant has submitted construction plans to the Building Division for these five buildings. The sizes of the proposed parcels are as follows: Parcel No. Area (net acres) 1 2.20 2 2.93 3 5.95 4 4.56 5 5.36 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2014-147 November 3, 2014 Page 2 of 3 ANALYSIS: The purpose of Commission’s consideration of a tentative parcel map is to review the proposed subdivision of land for consistency with the General Plan and compliance with the zoning code. The proposed subdivision complies with all of the development standards of the Specific Plan, including the maximum floor area ratio, minimum number of parking spaces, and required access. A recommended condition of approval requires the recordation of a reciprocal easement agreement for ingress/egress, parking, maintenance and trash pick-up for the entire property. The subdivision would also be in conformance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which includes the following goals and policies: Goal 2.1: Preserve and project the image of The Canyon as one of the most prominent business centers in Orange County. Policies: 1) Intensify land uses in close proximity to the Metrolink Station. 2) Facilitate a dynamic mix of uses and create a distinctive employment setting through adherence to policies in the Community Design Element related to The Canyon. 3) Intensify uses in close proximity to bus stops along La Palma Avenue, a future enhanced bus system route. 4) Improve pedestrian mobility through the addition of sidewalks (e.g. on La Palma Avenue near the Metrolink Station). 5) Protect and enhance the integrity and desirability of industrial sites from non-industrial uses. 6) Improve landscaping along the edge of the Santa Ana River and settling basins in cooperation with the Orange County Water District. 7) Work with the Orange County Water District to expand upon the development potential of the water percolation basins located in the area. 8) Ensure quality development through Zoning Code development standards and the Community Design Element policies and guidelines. The previously certified EIR 317, prepared for the Northeast Area Specific Plan, analyzed the environmental impacts for the full buildout of commercial and industrial developments within the 2,450-acre Specific Plan area, subject to the development standards contained within the Specific Plan. The proposed industrial subdivision is in compliance with these standards. The subdivision would not create a greater impact than the impacts previously identified by EIR 317. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2014-147 November 3, 2014 Page 3 of 3 CONCLUSION: Staff recommends approval of the requested industrial subdivision because the request complies with the goals of the General Plan and all development standards of the Northeast Area Specific Plan. Prepared by, Submitted by, David See Jonathan E. Borrego Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Tentative Parcel Map Resolution 3. Applicant’s Request Letter The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 4. Site Photographs 5. Tentative Parcel Map SP 94-1DA3PANATTONIANAHEIMCONCOURSE SP 94-1DA5SERVICE STATION SP 94-1DA3INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA3INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA2PANATTONIANAHEIMCONCOURSE SP 94-1DA3SUBSTATION SP 94-1DA5PARKING SP 94-1DA3BUSINESS PARK SP 94-1DA5AGRICULTURE DA5O.C.F.C.D. SP 94-1DA3OFFICES SP 94-1DA2TRUCKINGSERVICE SP 94-1DA3OC SOCIALSERVICESAGENCY SP 94-1DA2RELIGIOUS USE SP 94-1DA3PANATTONIANAHEIMCONCOURSE SP 94-1DA2PANATTONIANAHEIMCONCOURSE SP 94-1DA3PANATTONIANAHEIMCONCOURSE SP 94-1DA3PANATTONIANAHEIMCONCOURSESP 94-1DA3PANATTONIANAHEIMCONCOURSE SP 94-1DA2INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1DA5STERLINGBUSINESSCOMPLEX SP 94-1DA2INDUSTRIAL E LA P A L M A A V E N MI L L ER STE M IR A LO M A A V E N OCEAN CI RE A U T O N E T IC S W A Y E . M IR A L O M A A V E E . L A P A L M A A V E N.TUSTI N A VEN. MI LLER STN. BLUE GUM STE. FRONTERA ST E.LA P ALM A AVE3321 - 3325 Ea st L a Palma Av e n u e DE V N o. 201 4-0 0 0 6 0 Subject Property APN: 345-081-26 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2013 E LA P A L M A A V E N MI L L ER STE M IR A LO M A A V E N OCEAN CI RE A U T O N E T IC S W A Y N SHEPARD STE C O R O N A D O S T E . M IR A L O M A A V E E . L A P A L M A A V E N.TUSTI N A VEN. MI LLER STN. BLUE GUM STE. FRONTERA ST E.LA P ALM A AVE3321 - 3325 Ea st L a Palma Av e n u e DE V N o. 201 4-0 0 0 6 0 Subject Property APN: 345-081-26 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2013 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2014-147 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2014-00060) (3321 – 3325 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2014- 147 to establish a five lot industrial subdivision (herein referred to as the "Parcel Map") for certain real property located at 3321 – 3325 East La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 24 acres, is currently vacant. The Property is located in the La Palma Core Area (Development Area 3) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan and is subject to the zoning and development standards of Section 18.120.080 of Chapter 18.120 (Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SP94-1) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Anaheim Municipal Code combined with the zoning and development standards of the underlying base zone for Development Area 3, which is the “I” Industrial Zone. Unless otherwise indicated in Chapter 18.120 of the Code, the standards of the “I” Industrial Zone contained in Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall apply to the Property. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 3, 2014 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the content and sufficiency of the previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 317 (which included a Mitigation Monitoring Plan and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and findings related thereto; herein referred to collectively as “EIR No. 317”) and for and against proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2014-147 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, on August 22, 1995, the City Council certified EIR No. 317 by Resolution No. 95R-153, in support of the adoption of the Northeast Area Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission hereby finds and determines that, in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”) and Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations (herein referred to as the “CEQA Guidelines”), (i) EIR No. 317 serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2014-147 and satisfies all of the requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental environmental documentation have occurred in connection with the proposed Tentative Parcel - 1 - PC2014-*** Map No. 2014-147; and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2014-147; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Tentative Parcel Map No. 2014-147, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The proposed Parcel Map, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the Industrial land use designation in the Anaheim General Plan and, more specifically, the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SP94-1) and with the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.120 of the Code for the La Palma Core Area (Development Area 3) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SP94-1); and 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and density of the Parcel Map in conformance with the development standards of the “I” Industrial Zone and Section 18.120.080 of Chapter 18.120 of the Code for the La Palma Core Area (Development Area 3) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SP94-1); and 3. The the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified in the vicinity; and 4. The the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, as the proposed industrial buildings will be constructed in compliance with the zoning and development standards contained in Section 18.120.080 of Chapter 18.120 of the Code for the La Palma Core Area (Development Area 3) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan No. 94-1 (SP94-1); and 5. The the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2014-147, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. - 2 - PC2014-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 3, 2014. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (“Zoning Provisions - General”) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 3, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of November, 2014. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 3 - PC2014-*** - 4 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2014-147 (DEV2014-00060) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF PARCEL MAP 1 A Reciprocal Easement Agreement (REA) for ingress/egress, parking, maintenance and trash pick-up will be required as a condition of approval of the Subdivision application. The REA (i) must run with the land in perpetuity, (ii) shall inure to the benefit of, and be enforceable by, the City by any legal or equitable means against any person or persons in actual possession of the properties who directly or through any agent violate the terms hereof; and (iii) shall not be modified, supplemented or amended without the City's prior written consent. The REA shall be reviewed and approved by the City Attorney prior to its execution and recordation in the Official Records of the County of Orange. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning Department. The covenant shall be referenced in all deeds transferring all or any part of the interest in the property. Planning Department 2 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section of the Public Works Department for review and approval by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of private facilities, including compliance with an approved Water Quality Management Plan, and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance responsibilities shall include parkway landscaping and irrigation on La Palma Avenue. The covenant shall be recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange concurrently with the final parcel map. Public Works- Development Services 3 The legal property owner shall execute a Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to complete the required public improvements at the legal property owner’s expense. Said agreement shall be submitted in a form satisfactory to the Public Works Department (Subdivision Section) and approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. Public Works- Development Services 4 A street improvement plan shall be submitted to the Public Works Department for the construction of improvements, including landscaping and irrigation, along the frontage of La Palma Avenue. The landscape and irrigation plans shall include relocation of existing sidewalks and trees to its ultimate location. The improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Public Works Landscape and Irrigation Manual for Public Street and Highway. Public Works- Development Services - 5 - PC2014-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 5 The developer shall post a security to guarantee the construction of public works improvements in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney. The improvements shall be constructed prior to final building and zoning inspections. Public Works- Development Services GENERAL CONDITIONS 6 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnities to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department 7 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department 8 The premises shall be developed substantially in accordance with the plans and specifications submitted to and reviewed and approved by the City of Anaheim, which plan is on file with the Planning Department. Planning Department - 6 - PC2014-*** From:Mark Lewis To:David See Subject:TPM No. 2014-147 Date:Thursday, October 09, 2014 3:03:37 PM Attachments:Lot Line Adjustment - Recorded (AC - Phase III) 6.13.13.pdf Dave, This TPM request for TPM No. 2014-147 is to subdivide Lot 3 of LLA-0000697 recorded as Instrument No. 2013000335748 into 5 individual parcels. Attached is LLA 697 to show how the lot is currently configured. The purpose of this subdivision is to have all five buildings of the project site sit on individual parcels in order to give ownership the flexibility in the future to sell off the buildings individually should they decide to go that route. All buildings being constructed are industrial buildings and the estimated date of completion is 11/1/15. We anticipate the tenants/users to be industrial/distribution type users with a portion of their space being used for office. Please let me know if you need anything else in order to get this TPM on the November 3rd Planning Commission agenda. Regards, Mark Lewis Development Manager Panattoni Development Company, Inc. 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 200 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (p) 949-296-2967 (f) 916-418-2919 (c) 949-632-5962 (e) mlewis@panattoni.com ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05760 LOCATION: 2420 East Katella Avenue (Patisserie du Roi) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Edward Hu with LV Group, LLC. The agent representing the applicant is David Jackson and the property owner is Starmont Shops at Stadium Towers. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to allow the sale of beer and wine for on premises consumption within a new pastry restaurant in a commercial center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05760. BACKGROUND: This 2.0-acre property is developed with two commercial buildings. The property is located in the General Commercial (C-G) and the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use (PTMU) Overlay zones. The General Plan designates this property for Mixed Use land uses. The property is surrounded by a freestanding restaurant to the east and offices to the north, south and west. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to sell beer and wine in a new 1,640 square foot pastry restaurant. No physical changes to the restaurant space are proposed. The restaurant would provide a full breakfast, lunch and dinner menu seven days a week, with daily hours of operation from 6:00 a.m. to 12:00 a.m. ANALYSIS: The Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit to authorize the sale of beer and wine in a restaurant in order to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. A determination of public convenience or necessity is not required for restaurants serving beer and wine. The number of alcohol licenses allowed in each of the City’s census tracts is regulated by the State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) and is based upon population. The restaurant is located within Census Tract No. 863.03, which has a population of 6,212 residents. This population figure allows for seven licenses and presently there are 23 licenses within the tract. The high concentration of licenses in the tract is due to the location of the property within the Platinum Triangle. This concentration is compatible with the unique character of the Platinum Triangle as a regional sports and entertainment destination, and complementary to the goals of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan to bring high density, mixed-use, office, restaurant and residential projects to the area. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05760 November 3, 2014 Page 2 of 2 The location is within Police Reporting District No. 2028, which has a crime rate that is below the citywide average. There have been no calls for service to this location in the last year. The crime rate within ¼ mile of this property is also below the citywide average with calls for service during the past year consisting of ten petty thefts, eight vandalisms and six simple assaults. Staff does not anticipate that the addition of beer and wine sales at this location would contribute to an increase in crime. Staff believes the sale of beer and wine would be compatible with the surrounding area because this is a predominantly commercial area consisting of other restaurant, entertainment, retail and office uses. Conditions of approval to help ensure that the business is operated in a responsible manner have been attached to the draft resolution. These conditions include a prohibition on any exterior advertising of alcoholic beverages and required ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training for employees. Staff conducted an inspection of the property and found it to be well maintained. There are no outstanding Code Enforcement violations associated with this property. CONCLUSION: The sale of beer and wine in conjunction with a pastry restaurant would complement existing nearby businesses and entertainment venues. The recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the sale of beer and wine would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Amy Vazquez Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner, Lilley Planning Group Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 3. Letter of Request 4. Police Memorandum The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 5. Photographs 6. Site Plan 7. Floor Plan C-G (PTMU)KatellaBUSINESS PARK O-L (PTMU)KatellaPARKING STRUCTURE I (PTMU)SERVICESTATION C-G (PTMU)KatellaRESTAURANTI (PTMU)AUTO REPAIRSERVICE ISTADIUM PLAZABUSINESS PARK PR (PTMU)StadiumTHE GROVEOF ANAHEIM O-L (PTMU)KatellaVACANT O-L (PTMU)KatellaSTADIUM TOWER PLAZAOFFICE BLDG. O-H (PTMU)OFFICES IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL 57 FREEWAYE KAT EL LA AVE S SINCLAIR ST E HOWELL AVE E. KATELLA AVES. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S. SUNKIST STE. GENE AUTRY WAY S.DOUGLASSRD2420 Eas t Kate lla Avenue DE V N o. 201 4-0 0 0 9 4 Subject Property APN: 253-532-13 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2013 57 FREEWAYE KAT EL LA AVE S SINCLAIR ST E HOWELL AVE E. KATELLA AVES. LEWIS STE. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S. SUNKIST STE. GENE AUTRY WAY S.DOUGLASSRD2420 Eas t Kate lla Avenue DE V N o. 201 4-0 0 0 9 4 Subject Property APN: 253-532-13 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2013 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05760 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2014-00094) (2420 EAST KATELLA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05760 to allow the on-site consumption of beer and wine in a new restaurant (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") on that certain real property located at 2420 East Katella Avenue in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), pursuant to Section 18.60.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“Code”); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 2.0 acres in size and is developed with an 8- unit commercial center. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Mixed Use land uses. The Property is located within the “C-G” (General Commercial) Zone. As such, the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (General Commercial Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, on November 3, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05760, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 (Class 1 – Existing Facilities) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and -1- WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05760, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit beer and wine service for on-premises consumption in conjunction with a new restaurant in an existing commercial retail center in the Commercial Zone is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Code Section No. 18.08.030 [Uses – Commercial Zones)] of the Code. 2. The request to permit beer and wine service for on-premises consumption in conjunction with a restaurant would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Property is currently developed with a commercial retail center and the existing use is compatible with the surrounding area; and 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the existing use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Property is currently improved with a commercial retail center and there is no proposed expansion; and 4. The traffic generated by permitting beer and wine service for on-premises consumption in conjunction with a restaurant would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the Property are consistent with the existing commercial use of the Property and the permitted businesses within the commercial center; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the Property is a commercial center which allows restaurant businesses and the existing restaurant is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. - 2 - PC2014-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05760 at the Property, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05760 is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2014-05760 constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 3, 2014. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a resolution of the City Council in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 3 - PC2014-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 3, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of November, 2014. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2014-*** - 5 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2014-05760 (DEV2014-00094) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 The managers and/or owners shall call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training for themselves and service employees. The contact number is 714-558-4101. Police Department 2 The activities occurring in conjunction with the operation of this establishment shall not cause noise disturbances to surrounding properties. Police Department 3 All activities related to the use shall occur indoors, except as may be permitted by an authorized Special Event Permit. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 4 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, or minimum purchase required. Police Department 5 At all times when the premises is open for business, the premises shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. Police Department 6 There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. 7 The existing restaurant shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation as described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Operation and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 8 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. Any security officers provided shall comply with all State and Local ordinances regulating their services, including, without limitation, Chapter 11.5 of Division 3 of the California Business and Profession Code. Police Department 9 The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises shall be prohibited. Police Department - 6 - PC2014-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10 The occupancy shall not exceed the lesser of (i) the occupancy limit for the premises established by the Anaheim Fire Department or (ii) an occupancy limit established as a condition of the permit approved pursuant to this chapter, or any zone variance issued pursuant to Title 18 of this Code. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit(s) from the room(s). Police Department, Fire Department 11 The business shall not employ or permit any persons to solicit or encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the licensed premises under any commission, percentage, salary, or other profit-sharing plan, scheme or conspiracy. Police Department 12 The managers and/or owners shall not share any profits, or pay any percentage or commission to a promoter or any other person, based upon monies collected as a door charge, cover charge, or any other form of admission charge, including minimum drink orders, or the sale of drinks. Police Department 13 Subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code. Police Department 14 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police Department 15 There shall be no entertainment, amplified music, loitering, or dancing permitted outside of the building. No entertainment shall be allowed on the premises unless the business owner first obtains an Entertainment Permit. Police Department 16 Windows of restaurant shall not be covered by advertising to the extent that the interior is not clearly visible from the outside to enable officers responding to potential emergency situations to observe any activity which may be occurring inside. At no time shall window signs exceed 10% of the window area, in compliance with the Zoning Code. Police Department 17 No required parking area shall be fenced-off or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage uses. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division - 7 - PC2014-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 18 The managers and/or owners shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division GENERAL CONDITIONS 19 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 20 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 21 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 8 - PC2014-*** ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. ITEM NO. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: NOVEMBER 3, 2014 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05702 AND VARIANCE NO. 2014-04989 LOCATION: 1220 South Brookhurst Street (Nara Bistro) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Salee Zawerbek and the property owners are Mohamed Khouraki & Youssef Ibrahim Partners. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to expand an existing restaurant and indoor smoking lounge and to permit and retain an outdoor smoking lounge. The applicant is also requesting approval of a variance to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05702 and Variance No. 2014-04989. BACKGROUND: This 2.27-acre property is developed with a commercial center. The property is located in the General Commercial (C-G) zone and Brookhurst Commercial Corridor (BCC) overlay zone. The General Plan designates this property for General Commercial land uses. The property is surrounded by commercial and residential uses to the north across Ball Road, a restaurant to the east, condominiums to the south, and commercial uses to the west across Brookhurst Street. In 2010, this business was approved as a smoking lounge through an administrative regulatory permit. Food service inside the restaurant was allowed at the time. Since the approval of the administrative permit, the City Attorney has advised staff that enforcement of State labor laws relating to workplace smoking falls within the City’s jurisdiction. State labor laws include the prohibition of smoking indoors where food and beverages are served. Staff is now actively enforcing the prohibition of food service inside all indoor smoking lounges. This conditional use permit request was initiated through Code Enforcement actions pertaining to the unpermitted outdoor smoking lounge and outdoor heating of coals. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net VARIANCE NO. 2014-04989 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05702 November 3, 2014 Page 2 of 3 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to modify the floor plan and operations of the existing restaurant and smoking lounge in order to comply with the State Smoke-free Workplace laws. The request includes an indoor restaurant that would serve food only; a separate indoor smoking lounge; and an outdoor smoking lounge with service of food. The restaurant and indoor smoking lounge would be open from 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 a.m. daily. The outdoor smoking lounge is proposed to close at 2:00 a.m. No sales of alcoholic beverages are proposed within the smoking lounge or the restaurant. The following changes to the existing business operations and plans are proposed: • Modify the existing smoking lounge and restaurant to become an 884 square foot indoor restaurant where no smoking would be permitted. • Create a 1,364 square foot indoor smoking lounge adjacent to, but separate from, the restaurant where no food or drink sales or service would be permitted. • Create a 959 square foot outdoor smoking lounge with sales and service of food to be surrounded by a six foot high wrought iron fence. • Utilize an adjacent tenant space for storage. ANALYSIS: A conditional use permit is required for a smoking lounge located within 200 feet of a residential zone and for any outdoor smoking lounge. The nearest portion of the smoking lounge tenant space would be approximately 25 feet from the closest residential zone boundary to the south of the property. However, this portion of the tenant space would be used for storage purposes only. The outdoor and indoor portions of the smoking lounge would be located at least 70 feet from the residential zone boundary and approximately 140 feet from the nearest residential dwelling. The commercial building, two drive aisles and two rows of residential carports act as a buffer between the smoking lounge and the adjacent residences. Staff believes that the 140 foot distance from the residences and the intervening structures provide adequate protection for the adjacent residences from noise, odor or other potential impacts from the smoking lounge. No live or amplified music or entertainment is proposed or allowed outdoors. Entertainment would be permitted in the restaurant space, but would not be allowed within the interior smoking lounge because of the State Smoke-free Workplace laws. There have been 11 calls for Police service to this business in the last year. These calls consisted of 5 disturbances, 2 trespasses, 1 fight, 1 assault, 1 criminal threat and 1 mental case. Police Department staff does not consider these calls to be extraordinary for this location and therefore, do not object to this proposal. Staff conducted an inspection of the commercial center and found it to be properly maintained. The smoking lounge has been operating in a manner compatible with the area and surrounding businesses. Parking: The restaurant and smoking lounge are located in a commercial center with various types of commercial, office and retail uses. The majority of these businesses operate during regular weekday business hours. The restaurant and smoking lounge would be open during weekday business hours; however, peak periods would occur at night and on weekends. VARIANCE NO. 2014-04989 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05702 November 3, 2014 Page 3 of 3 The Zoning Code requires 199 parking spaces for the commercial center, including 67 parking spaces for the restaurant and smoking lounge. A total of 120 parking spaces are provided on site. The property originally had more parking spaces which were removed with the construction of the service station at the southeast corner of Ball Road and Brookhurst Street. The peak parking demand for the smoking lounge and restaurant occurs after 8:00 p.m. on weekends. The majority of the businesses within the center are closed by 7:00 p.m. with the exception of three restaurants and a smoke shop which close between 9:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. Because the subject business primarily operates during the off-peak hours for the center, the parking spaces available on-site are adequate to accommodate the parking demand of the proposed smoking lounge and the commercial center. Staff has verified the availability of adequate parking during site inspections conducted on weekends after 10:00 p.m. PARKING REQUIREMENTS FOR THE COMMERCIAL CENTER DURING PEAK SMOKING LOUNGE HOURS OF OPERATION Use After 8 p.m. After 9 p.m. After 10 p.m. Nara Bistro/Smoking Lounge 46 46 46 Fast Food Restaurants 10 0 0 Smoke Shop 5 5 0 Restaurant 38 38 0 Total Required 99 89 46 CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the request to permit an expansion of the existing restaurant and indoor smoking lounge and create a new outdoor smoking lounge is compatible with the adjacent businesses and the surrounding area. The restaurant and outdoor smoking lounge would operate during times when the other businesses will be closed, freeing up parking for Nara Bistro. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Vanessa Norwood Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Vicinity and Aerial Maps 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution 3. Applicant’s Letters of Request 4. Police Department Memorandum The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Department at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 5. Site Photographs 6. Plans C-G (BCC)RETAIL C-G (BCC)RETAIL C-GVETERINARYCLINIC IINDUSTRIAL C-GAMAANAHGREENBRIERSCHOOL C-G (BCC)SERVICESTATION RM-4CONDOMINIUMS236 DU C-GRESTAURANT RM-4APARTMENTS20 DU C-G (BCC)MONTESSORISCHOOL RS-3S.F.R. C-G (BCC)MEDICAL OFFICE RM-4APARTMENTS40 DU RM-3FOURPLEX C-G (BCC)SHOPPING CENTER C-G (BCC)RETAIL RM-3TOWNHOMES111 DU RM-4APTS10 DU I (BCC)RETAIL I (BCC)INDUSTRIALC-G (BCC)RETAIL IINDUSTRIAL C-G (BCC)RETAIL C-G (BCC)SERVICESTATION C-G (BCC)RETAIL C-G (BCC)SHOPPING CENTER C-G (BCC)SHOPPINGCENTER UNINCORPORATED ANAHEIMUNINCORPORATED ANAHEIMW BALL RD S BROOKHURST STS HEARTH LNS COVENTRY DRW JUNO AVE W BIENVI LLE AV E S CORNWALL DRW YORK CIR W ESSEX CIR W WELLINGTON CIR W AVON CIR W. BALL RD W. BROADWAY S. EUCLID STS. BROOKHURST STS. GILBERT STW. CERRITOS AVES. MAGNOLIA AVE1 2 2 0 South Brookhurs t Street D EV No. 2 0 13-00103 Subject Property APN: 128-341-56 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 13 W BALL RD S BROOKHURST STS HEARTH LNS COVENTRY DRW JUNO AVE W BIENVI LLE AV E S CORNWALL DRW YORK CIR W ESSEX CIR W WELLINGTON CIR W AVON CIR W. BALL RD W. BROADWAY S. EUCLID STS. BROOKHURST STS. GILBERT STW. CERRITOS AVES. MAGNOLIA AVE1 2 2 0 South Brookhurs t Street D EV No. 2 0 13-00103 Subject Property APN: 128-341-56 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aeri al Ph oto :May 20 13 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2014-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05702 AND VARIANCE NO. 2014-04989 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2014-00103) (1220 SOUTH BROOKHURST STREET) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05702 to permit an outdoor smoking lounge within an existing commercial tenant space and Variance No. 2014-04989 to permit fewer parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") (collectively referred to herein as the "Proposed Project") at 1220 South Brookhurst Street in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, the location of which commercial center is generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 2.27 acres, is developed with a commercial center. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses. The Property is located in the “CG” General Commercial Zone, meaning that the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code. The Property is also located within the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor (BCC) Overlay Zone, meaning that the regulations contained in Chapter 18.22 (Brookhurst Commercial Corridor (BCC) Overlay Zone) of the Code shall apply to the Property and shall supersede any inconsistent regulations of the “CG” General Commercial Zone; and WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, on November 3, 2014, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05702 and Variance No. 2014-04989 , and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05702 and Variance No. 2014- 04989, does find and determine the following facts: - 1 - PC2014-*** 1. The proposed request to allow an indoor and outdoor smoking lounge in conjunction with an existing restaurant within the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor (BCC) Overlay Zone is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of the Code; and 2. The proposed conditional use permit to allow the indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area in which those uses are proposed to be located because the building is surrounded by and integrated with similar buildings and uses, and the peak operating hours for the proposed smoking lounges and restaurant would occur during the lowest parking demand of the adjacent businesses; and 3. The size and shape of the site for the uses is adequate to allow the full development of the site with the indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the proposed expansion of the existing restaurant would be located within an existing commercial building and is surrounded by compatible commercial uses; and 4. The traffic generated by the proposed indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will occur after the highest peak afternoon hours on the adjacent highways; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant, under the conditions imposed, will be compatible with the surrounding area because the use is integrated with other uses within the commercial center and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for a variance to permit less parking than required by the Code in conjunction with the proposed indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (199 spaces required for the entire commercial center; 120 spaces existing) 1. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use. A total of 120 spaces are provided. The majority of the commercial businesses are not occupied during peak parking demands created by the indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant; and 2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the - 2 - PC2014-*** proposed use because on-site parking within the commercial center will not increase or compete for on-street parking, since adequate parking is provided on-site to accommodate the peak parking demands of the proposed indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant and the other uses on the site; and 3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity. The indoor and outdoor smoking lounges in conjunction with an existing restaurant and all other uses on the site generate a peak parking demand of 199 parking spaces, while 120 spaces are available; and 4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the property and are designed to allow for adequate on-site circulation; and 5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and, therefore, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the restaurant. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve and Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05702 and Variance No. 2014-04989 , contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 3 - PC2014-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on November 3, 2014. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on November 3, 2014, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 3rd day of November, 2014. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2014-*** - 5 - PC2014-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2014-04989 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05702 (DEV2014-00103) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 120 DAYS OF APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 1 Building permits shall be obtained for any tenant improvements proposed as part of this project including improvements related to the outdoor seating and sidewalk areas. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division and Building Division PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE USE 2 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Police Department 3 File an updated Emergency Listing Card, Form APD-281, with the Police Department, available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim,net/article.asp?id=678. Police Department OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 4 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage. Planning Department, Code Enforcement 5 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Planning Department, Code Enforcement 6 Petitioner shall provide at least one uniformed security guard on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday nights, from 9:00 p.m. to closing. Police Department 7 A plan containing security measures shall be prepared by the applicant and submitted for approval to the Anaheim Police Department, which shall include measures necessary to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. Police Department 8 Any and all security officers provided shall comply with all State and Local ordinances regulating their services, including, without limitation, Chapter 11.5 of Division 3 of the California Business and Profession Code. Police Department - 6 - PC2014-*** 9 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. Police Department 10 The operation of any business under this permit shall not be in violation of any provision of the Anaheim Municipal Code, State or County ordinances, rules or regulations, including but not limited to Section 6404.5 of the California Labor Code. Police Department 11 The permitted use at the Property shall not create sound levels which violate any ordinance of the City of Anaheim. Police Department 12 The business shall not be operated in such a way as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. Police Department 13 The maximum occupancy/number of patrons shall not exceed the occupancy limit for the premises established by the Anaheim Fire Department and Building Division. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the room. Fire Department, Building Division, Code Enforcement, Police Department 14 No persons under 18 years of age shall be permitted to enter and stay within any area of the business premises where the smoking of tobacco or other substances is allowed, including any outdoor seating area, and signs shall be posted at the entrances to the patio area and the indoor smoking lounge stating “No person under the age of 18 allowed.” Police Department 15 The restaurant shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant at all times it is open for business. The restaurant shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. No smoking of any tobacco products shall be permitted within the restaurant. Signs prohibiting smoking of tobacco products within the restaurant shall be installed and maintained at entry points to the restaurant advising patrons that smoking is prohibited within the restaurant, including any area used for the preparation of food. Police Department 16 The doors shall remain closed at all times, except during times of entry or exit, emergencies and deliveries. If the applicant applies to the City for and obtains an entertainment permit, entertainment must be contained in the restaurant portion of the business only. There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted in either the indoor or outdoor smoking lounges. Police Department 17 All hookah preparation shall be conducted wholly within the building. Operation of outdoor barbeques or braziers or lighting coals shall not be permitted. Police Department 18 All employees shall be clothed in such a way as to not expose “specified anatomical areas” as described in Section 7.16.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Police Department 19 No window coverings shall prevent visibility of the interior of the tenant space from outside the premises during operating hours. Any proposed window tint shall be approved in advance by the Anaheim Police Department. Police Department - 7 - PC2014-*** 20 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the owner or operator of the business premises shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Police Department 21 The applicant shall monitor the area under their control in an effort to prevent the loitering of persons about the premises. Police Department 22 The patio area/outdoor smoking lounge shall be closed no later than 2:00 a.m. each day. The Police Department retains the ability to review operations that pertain to the patio area/outdoor smoking lounge and make necessary changes or modifications to operations if necessary. Police Department 23 The business shall be operated in accordance with the Letter of Request submitted as part of this application. Any changes to the business operation, as described in that document, shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 24 The parking lot shall be cleaned at the close of the business each night to ensure that trash and debris left by the smoking lounge patrons is removed. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 25 No alcohol sales and consumption shall be permitted within any portion of the indoor and/or outdoor smoking areas. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 26 The restaurant shall have a self-closing exterior door in order to restrict the migration of tobacco smoke from the outdoor smoking lounge into the indoor restaurant. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 27 Adequate ventilation shall be provided for the heating of coals in accordance with all requirements imposed by the Anaheim Fire Department, or as otherwise required by state or federal laws. Fire Department GENERAL CONDITIONS 28 Any violation of the terms and conditions of Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05702 and/or Variance No. 2014-04989 or these conditions, shall be sufficient grounds for revocation. Police Department 29 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with prior to the issuance of a building permit shall be provided on plans submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to grading permits, final maps, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, security plans, parks and trail plans, and fire and life safety plans, etc. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 8 - PC2014-*** 30 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 31 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 32 The Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 9 - PC2014-*** ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 No. Timing Condition Responsible Department 1. The permitted event or activity shall not create sound levels which violate any ordinance of the City of Anaheim. Police Department 2. Petitioner shall provide one uniformed security guard on Thursday, Friday, and Saturday nights from 9:00 p.m. to closing. Police Department 3. Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. Police Department 4. Any and all security officers provided shall comply with all State and Local ordinances regulating their services, including, without limitation, Chapter 11.5 of Division 3 of the California Business and Profession Code. Police Department 5. The operation of any business under this permit shall not be in violation of any provision of the Anaheim Municipal Code, State or County ordinance. Police Department 6. The number of persons attending the event shall not exceed the maximum occupancy load as determined by the Anaheim Fire Department. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the room. Police Department 7. The doors shall remain closed at all times, except during times of entry or exit, emergencies and deliveries. If the applicant applies for an entertainment permit entertainment must be contained in the restaurant portion of the business only. There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted in the patio area or in the smoking lounge where hookah smoking is taking place. Police Department 8. There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. Police Department 9. The business shall not be operated in such a way as to be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare. Police Department 10. Any violation of the application, or any attached conditions, shall be sufficient grounds to revoke the permit. Police Department 11. Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to prevent loitering. Police Department 12. All employees shall be clothed in such a way as to not expose “specified anatomical areas” as described in Section 7.16.060 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Police Department 13. The interior restaurant shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant at all times it is open for business. The restaurant shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. Police Department 14. Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Police Department 15. All business related activities shall be conducted wholly within the building. Operation of outdoor barbeques or braziers or lighting coals shall not be permitted. Police Department 16. No window coverings shall prevent visibility of the interior of the tenant space from outside the premises during operating hours. Any proposed window tint shall be approved in advance by the Anaheim Police Department. Police Department 17. No persons under 18 years of age shall be permitted enter and stay within any area of the business premises where the smoking of tobacco or other substances is allowed including any outdoor seating area, and signs shall be posted at the entrances to the patio area stating “No person under the age of 18 allowed.” Police Department 18. The patio area shall close at 2:00 a.m. each day. The Police Department retains the ability to review operations that pertain to the patio area and make necessary changes or modifications to operations if necessary. Police Department Concur: Office of Chief of Police f:\home\mmirwin\2013-00103 DEV 1220 S Brookhurst Nara.doc ATTACHMENT NO. 5 BROOKHURST STREETBALL ROADP10P11P12P13P14P15P17P18P16P19P20P21 P22 P23 P24 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 P1 P25 P26 P27 P28 P29 P30 P31 P32 P33 H.C P34 P35 H.C P36 P37 P38 P39 P40 P41 P43 P43 P45 P46 P47 P48 P49 P50 P51 P52 P53 P54 P55 P56 P57 P58 P59 P60 P61 P62 P63 P64 P65 P66 P67 P68 P69 P70 P71 P72 P73 P74 P75 P76 P77 P78 P79 P80 P81 P82 P83 P84 P85 P86 P87 P88 P89 P90 P91 P92 P93 P94 H.CH.CP105 P106 P108 P109 P110 P111 P112 P113 P114 P115 P96 P101 P102 P104 P116 P117 P118 P119 P103 P107 P120 TB TB TB TB FIRE HYDRANT P95 P97 P98 P99 P100 GRAPHIC SCALE 0 5' 1' 20'30'50'SITE PLAN SCALE 1/16" = 1'-0" Existing 7/11 and Gas station ò Golden Crown Smoke Shop 1200 BROOKHURST VACANT 1202 LAUNDROMAT 1204 Elegant Nails 1216 INSURANCE 1218 Smoking Lounge 1364 sq. ft. 1222 1/2 ò Barber Shop = power poles TB = Trash bins APN 128-341-56 Property size: 2.27 acres Zoning: General commercial existing land use: General commercial ò 6$17,$¶6 PIZZA 1206 JAY CLEANER 1208 KAREEM REST. 1210 DENTIST 1212 CASH FOR GOLD 1214 TAMARA SALON 1224- 1226 Brookhurst Vacant 1228 Brookhurst Casa Gamino Restaurant 1220 Existing Nara Bistro Restaurant DATE EX. PREPARED SHEET Line of Covered Colonnade Fire Hydrant P = Parking Vacant Property Manager, Kimberly MoorePremier Commercial BrokerageLic. # 01800425Ph. 949 250-4181Proprietor, Salee Zawerbek1220 S Brookhurst, Anaheim., CAPh. # 949 231-9994****** * * ************ *** Tenants that close before 7 PM Tenants that stay open after 7 PM 1222 Proposed storage 1090 sq. ft. Not A Part Outdoor Smoking Lounge New Sidewalk 884 sq. ft. 959 sq. ft. 1 OF 2SITE PLAN* * Proposed smoking lounge = 959 sq. ft. 4297 sq. ft. Total sq. ft. Existing restaurant = 1,364 sq. ft. Proposed outdoor smoking lounge = 1090 sq. ft. Total sq. ft. Restaurant storage = Parking per 1000 sq. ft. @ 8 / 1000 = 7 @ 17 / 1000 = 23 @ 8 / 1000 = 9 @ 17 / 1000 = 17 Parking required 56 884 sq. ft. Total Parking Available for Site 122 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 P1206 ft high org. iron railingEmergency Exit 6 ft high org. iron railing ExitE.S. PE.S. P 1222 1/2 Vacant Not A Part 1224 & 1226 Not A Part Proposed Hookah Storage Existing Restaurant Kitchen Proposed Hookah preparation area Proposed Smoking Lounge 1364 sq. ft. 1222 S Brookhurst, Anaheim, Ca. Proposed Storage 1090 sq. ft. Nara Bistro 1222 S Brookhurst, Anaheim. Ca. Storage only Eating only - no smoking Existing Restaurant 884 sq. ft. Proposed Outdoor smoking lounge 959 sq. ft. New 6' Sidewalk New 6' SidewalkSCALE 1/4" = 1'-0" DATE EX. PREPARED SHEET Line of Covered Colonnade Property Manager, Kimberly MoorePremier Commercial BrokerageLic. # 01800425Ph. 949 250-4181Proprietor, Salee Zawerbek1220 S Brookhurst, Anaheim., CAPh. # 949 231-9994A EGG C B B H F Nara Bistro 1220 S Brookhurst, Anaheim. Ca. Proprietor, Salee Zawerbek A E3E2E1 E5E4 E5 B Hookah Coal Burner Ventilation Hood 2 OF 2FLOOR PLANElectrical RoomDoor Schedule 4'-0" x 6'-8" STEEL DOOR 3'-0" x 6'-8" STEEL DOOR DOUBLE 3'-0" x 6'-8" STEEL DOOR 3'-0" x 6'-8" SOLID CORE DOOR 3'-6" x 6'-8" GLAS DOOR 3'-0" x 6'-8" GLAS DOOR 3'-0" x 6'-8" WOOD DOOR 2'-0" x 6'-8" WOOD DOOR 3'-0" x 6'-8" O.I. DOORI H G F E D C B A 27"x48" Charcoal Heating & Hot Charcoal Equipment Legend Cooling 30" deep x 28" ref.E1 24"x60" tableE2 24"x30" tableE3 24"x24" existing sinkE4 18"x60" shelfE5 EXIST. SUB PANEL NEW WALLS Legend 6' High Orn. Iron Fence Proposed smoking lounge = 959 sq. ft. 4297 sq. ft. Total sq. ft. Existing restaurant = 1,364 sq. ft. Proposed outdoor smoking lounge = 1090 sq. ft. Total sq. ft. Restaurant storage = Parking per 1000 sq. ft. @ 8 / 1000 = 7 @ 17 / 1000 = 23 @ 8 / 1000 = 9 @ 17 / 1000 = 17 Parking required 56 884 sq. ft. Total Parking Available for Site 122 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.