Loading...
5568A ORDINANCE NO. 5568 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION 7.16.060 OF CHAPTER 7.16 OF TITLE 7 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PUBLIC NUDITY WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim has a substantial governmental interest in protecting societal order, decency, and morality; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim finds that the appearance of people in the nude in a public place or in a place open to, or visible by the public is detrimental to societal order, decency, and morality; and WHEREAS, it is the purpose and intent of this Ordinance to further the substantial governmental interest to protect societal order, decency and morality; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim has considered the decisions of the United States Supreme Court and California Supreme Court regarding regulation of conduct and public nudity, including, but not limited to: Barnes v. Glen Theatre, Inc., 111 S.Ct. 2456 (1991); Arcara v. Cloud Books, Inc., 478 US 697 (1986); United States v. O'Brien. 391 US 367 (1968); and People v. Monroe, 150 Cal 3d Supp 18 (1983); and WHEREAS, in Barnes V. Glen Theatre, Inc., cited in the previous recital, the United States Supreme Court found it to be constitutionally permissible to prohibit public nudity, including public nudity within Sex -Oriented Businesses, in part due to the secondary effects associated with public nudity in Sex -Oriented Businesses, which secondary effects include, but are not limited to, increases in prostitution and in sexual assaults, and the attraction of other criminal activity; and WHEREAS, prior to the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Council reviewed detailed studies prepared by other jurisdictions regarding the detrimental social and economic effects on persons and properties immediately surrounding established Sex -Oriented Businesses. These studies included those prepared by the cities of Austin, Texas; Taylor, Michigan; Detroit, Michigan; Indianapolis, Indiana; Garden Grove, California; Los Angeles, California; Phoenix, Arizona; and the Report of the Minnesota Attorney General's Working Group on the Regulation of Sexually Oriented Businesses (the "Studies"); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim believes as true the aforesaid Studies which show Sex -Oriented Businesses cause secondary impacts which degrade the areas of the City in which they are located, cause a blighting effect on the City, and increase crime in general, and sex related crimes in particular, in the vicinity of the Sex -Oriented Business; and i WHEREAS, the City Council further reviewed certain documents and judicial decisions in the public record established and submitted with this Ordinance relating to the secondary impacts of Sex -Oriented Businesses (the "Documents and Judicial Decisions"); and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim finds as follows, based, in part, upon its understanding of the Documents and Judicial Decisions: A. Evidence indicates that some dancers, models, entertainers, and other persons who publicly perform Specified Sexual Activities or publicly display Specified Anatomical Parts in Sex -Oriented Businesses (as those terms are defined in Chapter 18.89 of the Anaheim Municipal Code) (collectively referred to as "Performers") have been found to engage in sexual activities with patrons of Sex -Oriented Businesses on the site of the Sex -Oriented Business; B. Evidence has demonstrated that Performers employed by Sex -Oriented Businesses have been found to offer and provide private shows to patrons who, for a price, are permitted to observe and participate with the Performers in live sex shows; C. Evidence indicates that Performers at Sex -Oriented Businesses have been found to engage in acts of prostitution with patrons of the establishment; and WHEREAS, concern over sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, is a legitimate health concern of the City which demands reasonable regulations of Sex -Oriented Businesses in order to protect the health and well being of its citizens; and WHEREAS, the City Council believes that prohibiting public nudity will, to some extent, reduce those secondary effects shown to be created, in part, by Sex -Oriented Businesses which provide or permit public nudity; and WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim desires to protect the rights conferred by the United States Constitution; and WHEREAS, it is not the intent of this Ordinance to suppress any speech activities protected by the First Amendment, but to enact a general regulation protecting societal order, decency and morality which addresses the conduct of public nudity and is not aimed at expression. 2 A NOW THEREFORE, THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HEREBY ORDAINS AS FOLLOWS: SECTION 1. That Section 7.16.060 of Chapter 7.16 of Title 7 of the Anaheim Municipal Code be, and the same is hereby, amended to read as follows: 117.16.060 PUBLIC NUDITY - PROHIBITED. .010 It shall be unlawful, and a misdemeanor, for any person, while in any public park, playground, public right-of- way, or in any other public place or public accommodation, or in any place open to the public or obviously open to public view (with or without payment of an admission fee), to knowingly and intentionally: (a) Expose his or her genitals, pubic hair, cleft of the buttocks, perineum, anal region, or pubic hair region; or (b) Expose any device, costume, or covering which gives the appearance of or simulates the genitals, pubic hair, cleft of the buttocks, perineum, anal region or pubic hair region; or (c) Expose the nipples and/or areolae of the female breast, except as necessary while breastfeeding an infant under two (2) years of age; or (d) Expose any device (commonly known as a "pasty" or "pasties") worn as a cover over the nipples and/or areolae of the female breast, which device simulates and gives the realistic appearance of nipples and/or areolae. .020 The prohibitions set forth in subsection .010 above shall not apply to: (a) Any child under ten (10) years of age; or (b) Any person while participating in any activity authorized pursuant to Chapter 4.31 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; or (c) Any acts prohibited, or the prohibition of which is preempted, by any provision of state law; or (d) Any theater, concert hall, auditorium or similar establishment devoted to theatrical performances." 3 a SECTION 2. SEVERABILITY. The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby declares that should any section, paragraph, sentence or word of this ordinance be declared for any reason to be invalid, it is the intent of the Council that it would have passed all other portions of this ordinance independent of the elimination herefrom of any such portion as may be declared invalid. SECTION 3. SAVINGS CLAUSE. Neither the adoption of this ordinance nor the repeal of any other ordinance of this City shall in any manner affect the prosecution for violations of ordinances, which violations were committed prior to the effective date hereof, nor be construed as a waiver of any license or penalty or the penal provisions applicable to any violation thereof. The provisions of this ordinance, insofar as they are substantially the same as ordinance provisions previously adopted by the City relating to the same subject matter, shall be construed as restatements and continuations, and not as new enactments. SECTION 4. PENALTY It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to violate any provision or to fail to comply with any of the requirements of this ordinance. Any person, firm or corporation violating any provision of this ordinance or failing to comply with any of its requirements shall be deemed guilty of a misdemeanor and upon conviction thereof shall be punished by a fine not exceeding One Thousand Dollars ($1000.00) or by imprisonment not exceeding six (6) months, or by both such fine and imprisonment. Each such person, firm or corporation shall be deemed guilty of a separate offense for each day during any portion of which any violation of any of the provisions of this ordinance is committed, continued or permitted by such person, firm or corporation, and shall be punishable therefor as provided for in this ordinance. THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of Jules , 1996. 01 MAYOR OF THE CITY OF &VAHEIM ATTEST:--� CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 13632.2\JWHITE\June 14, 1996 4 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance No. 5568 was introduced at a regular meeting of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 25th day of June, 1996, and that the same was duly passed and adopted at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 9th day of July, 1996, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: Tait, Zemel, Feldhaus, Lopez, Daly NOES: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Ordinance No. 5568 on the 9th day of July, 1996. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 9th day of July, 1996. -�;� -;�l =�;7� , CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Ordinance No. 5568 and was published once in the North County News on the 18th day of July, 1996. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM