Loading...
PC 2016/05/16 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, May 16, 2016 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairman: Michelle Lieberman • Chairman Pro-Tempore: Mitchell Caldwell • Commissioners: Paul Bostwick, Bill Dalati, Grant Henninger, Victoria Ramirez, John Seymour • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, May 12, 2016, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 05/16/2016 Page 2 of 7 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 05/16/2016 Page 3 of 7 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00126 (DEV2016-00019) Location: 1640-1650 South Harbor Boulevard, Unit D Request: A Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit off-sale beer and wine sales within an existing hotel gift shop. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Sophia Tatlyan statlyan@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00128 (DEV2016-00022) Location: 1411 South Manchester Avenue Request: A Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit off-sale beer and wine sales within an existing hotel gift shop. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Sophia Tatlyan statlyan@anaheim.net 05/16/2016 Page 4 of 7 ITEM NO. 4 VARIANCE NO. 2016-05070 (DEV2016-00040) Location: 1039 South Summer Breeze Lane Request: A variance request to permit the construction of a new detached pool cabana building in the rear yard of a single family residence with a reduced rear yard setback. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Jonathan Borrego jborrego@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05862 (DEV2016-00020) Location: 5579 East Santa Ana Canyon Road Request: To permit the sales and on-site consumption of beer and wine at an existing café/salon which is located within a commercial shopping center (Pangaea Café in Alexander’s Grand Spa and Salon). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Ashley Hefner ahefner@anaheim.net 05/16/2016 Page 5 of 7 ITEM NO. 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A (DEV2012-00053A) Location: 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934 - 950 North Keystone Street Request: To amend a previously-approved conditional use permit and variance to modify plans for a proposed aquatic center on four residential lots on the west side of the Servite High School campus with a side yard setback less than permitted by Code. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the previously-approved Mitigated Negative Declaration is appropriate to serve as the environmental impact determination for this request per the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) guidelines. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Kevin Clausen kclausen@anaheim.net 05/16/2016 Page 6 of 7 ITEM NO. 7 ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO FINAL SUBSEQUENT EIR NO. 339 AND MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN NO. 330 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2015-00506 MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2015-00621 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2015-00002 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2015-174 (DEV2015-00078)* *This project was advertised as also including Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00622 and Final Site Plan Nos. 2015-00003, 2015-00004 and 2015-0005. These case numbers were subsequently determined to be unnecessary. Location: 1800 East Gene Autry Way Request: To develop a mixed-use project consisting of 1,079 residential units inclusive of 12 live/work units, 9,800 square feet of retail space, a public park, and a network of local streets (Jefferson Stadium Park Project) including the following: 1) a General Plan Amendment to amend the Land Use, Green and Circulation Elements of the General Plan to reflect the relocation of the proposed park and proposed street alignment; 2) an amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan to reconfigure internal streets, reflect the relocation of the proposed park and designate areas currently assigned for park use for mixed-use development; 3) A development agreement between the City of Anaheim and Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. to develop the Jefferson Stadium Park Project; and, 4) a tentative parcel map to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park, and establish the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and a public park to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will determine whether an addendum to the previously certified Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, along with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330, together with other previously-approved environmental documentation, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Project Actions. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net Adjourn to Wednesday, June 1, 2016 at 5:00 p.m. 05/16/2016 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 4:30 p.m. May 11, 2016 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 16, 2016 SUBJECT: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00126 LOCATION: 1650 South Harbor Boulevard, Unit D (Alpha Gift Mart) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Febe Ong of Alpha Gift Mart and the property owner is Eve Nober, representing DLM Off Price. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption in conjunction with an existing hotel gift shop. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approving Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00126. BACKGROUND: This 3.5-acre property is developed with a 199-room hotel (Grand Legacy Hotel), a 7,300 square foot Tony Roma’s restaurant, and six retail tenant spaces. The property is within the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP), in the C-R District (Development Area 1). The General Plan designates this property for Commercial Recreation uses. Surrounding uses include the Disney California Adventure Theme Park to the west, the Anaheim Inn hotel to the north, a Disney parking lot to the east and a Southern California Edison easement to the south. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to sell beer and wine for off-premise consumption within an existing gift shop. This type of alcohol sales requires a Type 20 Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license. The gift shop is 738 square feet and is located on the first level of the hotel. The shop sells beverages, snacks, toiletries, gifts and souvenirs. A small refrigerated section across from the sales counter would contain beer, wine and non-alcoholic beverages. The applicant’s letter of request indicates that beer and wine sales are expected to generate 10 to 15 percent of the store’s gross sales. The store is open from 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m., Monday through Thursday and 8:00 a.m. to 11:00 p.m., Friday through Sunday during the off-peak months of September through April. During peak season, from May through August, the store remains open an additional hour in the evening. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00126 May 16, 2016 Page 2 of 3 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation. Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity: In the ARSP, accessory off-sale beer and wine is a permitted accessory use when integrated within a hotel. State law limits the issuance of alcoholic beverage licenses when located in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average, or when there is an over-concentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. However, the law also states that such restrictions can be waived if the local jurisdiction makes a determination that the proposed outlet would serve "public convenience or necessity." A Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity is required in this case because this property is located within a reporting district with a high crime rate and there is an over-concentration of licenses in the census tract. The property is located within Census Tract No. 9800 which has a population of zero. Because the number of licenses permitted by ABC is proportional to the population within the census tract, no ABC licenses would be permitted within this census tract without a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. Currently there are 11 off-sale licenses and 42 on-sale licenses in the tract. This location is within Reporting District 2025 which is 224% above the city average in crime. There have been 13 calls for service to the hotel in the last year, but none of the calls involved the gift shop. The ¼ mile radius surrounding this location is 65% above the city average in crime. The circumstances that contribute to a higher than average crime rate are that The Anaheim Resort is a high-density tourist, convention, and recreation destination with a heavy concentration of tourist- oriented land uses and people. According to the applicant’s letter of request, customers inquire about beer and wine sales on a daily basis. The ability to sell of beer and wine at this shop will help meet the demands of hotel guests and other tourists visiting the area. The applicant will implement measures to discourage loitering and other unwelcome or illegal behavior. This includes use of hotel security, placement of the beer and wine cooler in direct view of the sales counter, and requiring ABC training for employees. Staff believes the proposed sales of beer and wine at the existing gift shop would be compatible with the surrounding hotels and visitor-serving uses. Staff believes that the sale of beer and wine, accessory and integrated into a hotel, would not pose safety concerns for the area. Since such sales are permitted as a matter of right in The Anaheim Resort, staff will be proposing a Code Amendment in the near future that would give the Planning Director authority to make the determination of public convenience or necessity for the sale of beer and wine, accessory and integrated into a hotel, for properties within the three specific plan areas that make up The Anaheim Resort. The Code currently authorizes the Planning Director to make this determination for uses classified as “Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing,” or craft breweries, unless the application is in conjunction with other entitlements that would require action by the Planning Commission. Staff will propose the same process for determinations in The Anaheim Resort. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00126 May 16, 2016 Page 3 of 3 Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The proposed sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption within an existing hotel gift shop is a compatible use within the surrounding area. The sale of such beverages will provide a convenience to hotel patrons and tourists visiting the area. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Sophia Tatlyan Jonathan E. Borrego Assistant Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution 2. Letter of Request and Justification 3. Police Department Memorandum 4. Plans 5. Photographs SP 92-2DA1GRAND LEGACYAT THE PARK HOTEL SP 92-2 DA1ANAHEIM INN SP 92-2 DA1RESTAURANT SP 92-2DA1 ANAHEIMDEL SOL INN SP 92-2 DA1ANAHEIM DESERT INN & SUITES SP 92-2DA1PARK VUE INN SP 92-2 DA1RESTAURANT SP 92-2DA1BEST WESTERNPARK PLACE HOTEL SP 92-1DA1CALIFORNIA ADVENTURE SP 92-1DA1CALIFORNIA ADVENTURE SP 92-1DA5ANAHEIM PLAZAHOTEL SP 92-1DA5GARDENWALK SP 92-1DA3ASOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. EASEMENT SP 92-1DA3APARKING LOT SP 92-2DA1SYBRON DENTAL SPECIATIES S H A R B O R B L V D W DISNEY WAY W. BALL RD W. KATELLA AVE S . L E W I S S T S . H A R B O R B L V D E. BALL RD S . W A L N U T S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D E. KATELLA AVE S . N I N T H S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY E.ORANGEWOODAVE S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1640 - 1650 South Harbor Boulevard DEV No. 2016-00019 Subject Property APN: 082-211-09082-211-08 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 S H A R B O R B L V D W DISNEY WAY W. BALL RD W. KATELLA AVE S . L E W I S S T S . H A R B O R B L V D E. BALL RD S . W A L N U T S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D E. KATELLA AVE S . N I N T H S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY E.ORANGEWOODAVE S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1640 - 1650 South Harbor Boulevard DEV No. 2016-00019 Subject Property APN: 082-211-09082-211-08 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00126 TO PERMIT A TYPE 20 (OFF SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2016-00019) (1650 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD, UNIT D) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00126 for a to permit the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption in conjunction with an existing hotel gift shop (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") for certain real property located at 1650 South Harbor Boulevard, Unit D in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 3.5 acres, is developed with a 199-room hotel, 7,300 square foot restaurant and six retail units. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Commercial Recreation land uses. The Property is located within the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and within the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) of the the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and is, therefore, subject to the zoning and development standards set forth in Section 18.116.070 (Uses – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 16, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00126, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00126, does find and determine the following facts: - 2 - PC2016-*** 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC"). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of Section 23958.4, "undue concentration" means the case in which the Property is located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes, than the average number of “reported crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4) as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 5. The Property is located within Census Tract No. 9800 with a population of zero that allows for no off-sale ABC licenses. There are presently 11 off-sale ABC licenses in the tract. The Property is located in Police Reporting District No. 2025, which has a crime rate that 224 percent above the City-wide average. The Police Department evaluates these requests based on the crime rate within a one-quarter mile radius of the Property for the subject site. The crime rate within ¼ mile of this Property is 65% above the City-wide average based upon calls for service. Since there is an overconcentration of off-sale licenses in the census tract and the property is within a high crime area, a determination of "public convenience or necessity" is required to be made for this request. - 3 - PC2016-*** 6. The Anaheim Resort, which is a world class tourist destination, was created to maintain and encourage Anaheim’s position as a nationally recognized tourist, convention and recreation center. The travel and hotel amenities, restaurants and entertainment uses are encouraged to meet the unique needs of the regional and global destination. The proposed sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption within in an existing hotel gift shop is a compatible use within the surrounding area and is consistent the goals of the Anaheim Resort. 7. The determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" can be made based on the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guideline for such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00126, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 4 - PC2016-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2016-*** - 6 - PC2016-*** EXHIBIT “B” PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00126 (DEV2016-00019) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 2 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 3 The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a building. Police Department 4 Sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made to customers only when the customer is in the building. Police Department 5 The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises. Police Department 6 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Police Department 7 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 8 Managers/Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training for themselves and register employees. The contact number is 714-558-4101. Police Department 9 The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. Police Department ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 16, 2016 SUBJECT: PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00128 LOCATION: 1411 South Manchester Avenue (Holiday Inn Express) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Sajan Patel of Nara Investments, LLC and the property owner is Praful Patel of Nara HIE, LLC. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption in conjunction with an existing hotel gift shop. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approving Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00128. BACKGROUND: This 1.16-acre property is developed with a five-story, 96-room hotel. The property is within the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP), in the C-R District (Development Area 1).The General Plan designates this property for Commercial Recreation uses. Surrounding uses include The Courtyard by Marriott hotel to the west, the Quality Inn & Suites to the south and Manchester Avenue and the I-5 Freeway to the north and east. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to sell beer and wine for off-premise consumption within an existing gift shop. This type of alcohol sales requires a Type 20 Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license. The gift shop is 45 square feet in size and is located within the hotel lobby area. A small refrigerated section of the gift shop would include beer, wine, soft drinks, juice and water. The store is open 24 hours a day, seven days a week and is supervised and operated by a Front Desk agent. Although open 24 hours a day, alcohol sales would not be permitted between the hours of 2:00 a.m. to 6:00 a.m. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00128 May 16, 2016 Page 2 of 3 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation. Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity: In the ARSP, accessory off-sale beer and wine is a permitted accessory use when integrated within a hotel. State law limits the issuance of alcoholic beverage licenses when located in a police reporting district with a crime rate above the City average, or when there is an over-concentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. However, the law also states that such restrictions can be waived if the local jurisdiction makes a determination that the proposed outlet would serve "public convenience or necessity." A Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity is required in this case because this property is located within a reporting district with a high crime rate and there is an over-concentration of licenses in the census tract. The property is located within Census Tract No. 9800 which has a population of zero. Because the number of licenses permitted by ABC is proportional to the population within the census tract, no ABC licenses would be permitted within this census tract without a determination of Public Convenience or Necessity. Currently there are 11 off-sale licenses and 42 on-sale licenses in the tract. This location is within Reporting District 1925 which is 209% above the city average in crime. There has been one call for service for a robbery during the last year. The ¼ mile radius surrounding this location is 128% above the city average in crime. The circumstances that contribute to a higher than average crime rate, are largely due to The Anaheim Resort being a high- density tourist, convention, and recreation destination with a heavy concentration of tourist-oriented land uses and people. According to the applicant’s letter of request, beer and wine sales are expected to comprise less than two percent of the hotel’s annual revenue. The purpose of providing beer and wine in the hotel is to better accommodate guests’ needs away from home. The applicant will implement operational measures to ensure that there will not be negative impacts from the sale of beer and wine. This includes prohibiting the consumption of beer and wine in public areas, use of hotel surveillance, and requiring ABC training for employees. Staff believes the proposed sales of beer and wine at the existing gift shop would be compatible with the surrounding hotels and visitor-serving uses. Staff believes that the sale of beer and wine, accessory and integrated into a hotel, would not pose safety concerns for the area. Since such sales are permitted as a matter of right in The Anaheim Resort, staff will be proposing a Code Amendment in the near future that would give the Planning Director authority to make the determination of public convenience or necessity for the sale of beer and wine, accessory and integrated into a hotel, for properties within the three specific plan areas that make up The Anaheim Resort. The Code currently authorizes the Planning Director to make this determination for uses classified as “Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing,” or craft breweries, unless the application is in conjunction with other entitlements that would require action by the Planning Commission. Staff will propose the same process for determinations in The Anaheim Resort. PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00128 May 16, 2016 Page 3 of 3 Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The proposed sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premise consumption within in an existing hotel gift shop is a compatible use within the surrounding area. The sale of such beverages will provide a convenience to hotel patrons. Staff recommends approval of the request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Sophia Tatlyan Jonathan E. Borrego Assistant Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Public Convenience or Necessity Resolution 2. Letter of Request and Justification 3. Police Department Memorandum 4. Plans 5. Photographs SP 92-2DA1QUALITY INN HOTEL SP 92-2DA1VOCATIONAL SCHOOL SP 92-2DA1VACANT SP 92-2DA1ANAHEIM FAIRFIELD INN BY MARRIOTT SP 92-2DA1DRIVE-THRU RESTAURANT SP 92-2DA1ANAHEIM CAMELOTINN & SUITES SP 92-2DA1SYBRON DENTAL SPECIATIES SP 92-2DA1HOWARD JOHNSONPLAZA HOTEL 5 FREEW AY S M ANCHESTER AVE W MANCHESTER AVE W MID WAY DR S PALM ST W. BALL RD S . W A L N U T S T S . L E W I S S T W. KATELLA AVE E. BALL RD S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . H A R B O R B L V D E. KATELLA AVE S . E A S T S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY W. DISNEY WAY 1411 South Manchester Avenue DEV No. 2016-00022 Subject Property APN: 082-170-57 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 5 FREEW AY S M ANCHESTER AVE W MANCHESTER AVE W MID WAY DR S PALM ST W. BALL RD S . W A L N U T S T S . L E W I S S T W. KATELLA AVE E. BALL RD S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . H A R B O R B L V D E. KATELLA AVE S . E A S T S T E. GENE AUTRY WAY W. DISNEY WAY 1411 South Manchester Avenue DEV No. 2016-00022 Subject Property APN: 082-170-57 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00128 TO PERMIT A TYPE 20 (OFF SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2016-00022) (1411 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00128 for a to permit the sales of beer and wine for off-site consumption in conjunction with an existing hotel gift shop (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") for certain real property located at 1411 South Manchester Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 1.16 acres, is developed with a five-story, 96-room hotel. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Commercial Recreation land uses. The Property is located within the boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan and within the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) of the the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and is, therefore, subject to the zoning and development standards set forth in Section 18.116.070 (Uses – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 16, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00128, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, as the "lead agency" under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00128, does find and determine the following facts: - 2 - PC2016-*** 1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC"). 2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of Section 23958.4, "undue concentration" means the case in which the premises are located in an area where any of the following conditions exist: (a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has a 20 percent greater number of reported crimes, than the average number of “reported crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4) as determined from all crime reporting districts within the City of Anaheim. (b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to population in the county in which the applicant premises are located. (c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to population in the county. 3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity" would be served by the issuance. 4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 5. The Property is located within Census Tract No. 9800 with a population of zero that allows for no off-sale ABC licenses. There are presently 11 off-sale ABC licenses in the tract. The Property is located in Police Reporting District No. 1925, which has a crime rate that 209 percent above the City-wide average. The Police Department evaluates these requests based on the crime rate within a one-quarter mile radius of the Property for the subject site. The crime rate within ¼ mile of this Property is 128% above the City-wide average based upon calls for service. Since there is an overconcentration of off-sale licenses in the census tract and the property is within a high crime area, a determination of "public convenience or necessity" is required to be made for this request. - 3 - PC2016-*** 6. The Anaheim Resort, which is a world class tourist destination, was created to maintain and encourage Anaheim’s position as a nationally recognized tourist, convention and recreation center. The travel and hotel amenities, restaurants and entertainment uses are encouraged to meet the unique needs of the regional and global destination. The proposed sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption within in an existing hotel gift shop is a compatible use within the surrounding area and is consistent the goals of the Anaheim Resort. 7. The determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" can be made based on the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guideline for such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or Necessity under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2016-00128, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 4 - PC2016-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2016-*** - 6 - PC2016-*** EXHIBIT “B” PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2016-00128 (DEV2016-00022) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building. Police Department 2 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. Police Department 3 The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the total display area in a building. Police Department 4 Sale of alcoholic beverages shall be made to customers only when the customer is in the building. Police Department 5 The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these premises. Police Department 6 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Police Department 7 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted. Police Department 8 Managers/Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training for themselves and register employees. The contact number is 714-558-4101. Police Department 9 The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. Police Department ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 AT T A C H M E N T NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 16, 2016 SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2016-05070 LOCATION: 1039 South Summer Breeze Lane APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Adam Barzak. REQUEST: The applicant requests a variance to allow a rear yard setback less than required by the Zoning Code to construct a detached swimming pool cabana. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and approving Variance No. 2016-05070. BACKGROUND: This 0.23-acre property is developed with a single-family residence and is located in the Single-Family Hillside Residential (RH-3) and Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay zones. The site is designated for Estate Density Residential land uses by the General Plan. The property is surrounded by single family residences in all directions. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct an approximately 480 square foot detached swimming pool cabana that encroaches in the property’s required rear yard setback area. The RH-3 zone requires a 15 foot wide rear yard setback for detached structures over 10 feet in height. The proposed cabana is 12 feet, 2 inches in height and would be set back eight feet from the rear property line. The cabana would be set back eight feet from the side property line which exceeds the code required six foot setback. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Before the Planning Commission may approve a variance, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that the following conditions exist: (1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; VARIANCE NO. 2016-05070 May 16, 2016 Page 2 of 2 (2) That, because of the special circumstances, shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. As previously stated, the Zoning Code requires a minimum 15-foot wide rear yard setback within this zone. The shape of the subject is irregular in that the rear lot line “jogs” inward approximately 10 feet in the area of the rear yard where the cabana is proposed to be sited. If the rear lot line did not have a significant jog and the lot was rectangular, then the cabana could be designed in a manner that complies with Code. Further, a primary reason that the Zoning Code requires detached accessory structures over 10 feet in height to maintain a rear yard setback of 15 feet in this zone is to ensure that such structures do not visually impose upon adjacent properties. The nearest residential lot to the rear of this property is located approximately 100 feet upslope. Therefore, the cabana would not create any visual obstruction upon the property to the rear. The applicant has also submitted written verification that all immediately adjacent property owners have no objection to the cabana as planned. Staff believes that the configuration of the property’s rear lot line creates a hardship that justifies the applicant’s variance request. Because of this condition, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Further, the nearest adjacent residential lot to the rear will in no way be impacted due to the large slope area that separates the properties. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this variance request. CONCLUSION: Staff believes the requested variance is justified because of the irregular shape of the lot and the minimal visual impact that the cabana will have upon adjacent properties. Staff recommends approval of the variance. Prepared by, Submitted by, Kevin Clausen Quiroz Jonathan E. Borrego Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Variance Resolution 2. Variance Justification Letter 3. Site, Floor and Elevation Plans 4. Photographs S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M IL Y R E S I D E N C E SP 88-2 (SC)DA101OPEN SPACE SP 88-2 (SC)DA101OPEN SPACE S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S P 8 8 - 2 ( S C ) D A 1 0 1 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S S U M M E R B R E E Z E L N S S U N S T R E A M L N E BLUE SKY WAY E B A I L E Y W A Y E A S H F I E LD LN E .S E R R A N O A V E E .OAK CANYONDR 1039 South Summer Breeze Lane DEV No. 2016-00040 Subject Property APN: 354-401-20 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 S S U M M E R B R E E Z E L N S S U N S T R E A M L N E BLUE SKY WAY E B A I L E Y W A Y E A S H F I E LD LN E .S E R R A N O A V E E .OAK CANYONDR 1039 South Summer Breeze Lane DEV No. 2016-00040 Subject Property APN: 354-401-20 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2015-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2016-05070 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2016-00040) (1039 SOUTH SUMMER BREEZE LANE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for Variance No. 2016-05070 to allow a rear yard setback less than required by the Zoning Code to construct a detached pool cabana (herein referred to collectively as the "Proposed Project") for certain real property located at 1039 South Summer Breeze Lane in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 0.23 acres, is currently developed with a single-family residence. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Estate Density Residential land uses. The Property is located in the “RH-3” Single-Family Hillside Residential Zone, which is combined with the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone meaning that the regulations contained in Chapter 18.18 (Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone) shall apply in addition to, and, where inconsistent therewith, shall supersede any regulations of the “RH-3” Single-Family Hillside Residential Zone contained in Chapter 18.04 (Single-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (herein referred to as the “Code”); and; WHEREAS, this Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 16, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Variance No. 2016-05070 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) which consist of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines provides examples of projects that qualify for an exemption from the provisions of CEQA, one of which being the construction of accessory (appurtenant) structures, including garages, carports, patios, swimming pools, and fences. Since the Proposed Project consists of the proposed construction of a swimming pool cabana, the Proposed Project will not cause a - 2 - PC2016-*** significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Variance No. 2016-05070 to allow a rear yard setback less than required by the Code to construct a detached swimming pool cabana should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.04.100.010.0101 Minimum rear yard setback (15 feet required; 8 feet proposed) 1. The requested variance is hereby approved because there are special circumstances applicable to the Property pertaining to its irregular shape. Specifically, the Property’s rear lot line contains an irregular, inward “jog” that limits the ability to build a cabana while maintaining the code required setback from said lot line. Further, the rear setback portion of this Property is adjacent to a hillside area that slopes upward and therefore would not impact the adjacent property. 2. Strict application of the Code would deprive the Property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because other properties in the area have rear yard setbacks less than the required 15 feet. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Variance No. 2016-05070, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. - 3 - PC2016-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Section 18.60.130 (Appeals – Planning Commission Decisions) of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2016-*** - 5 - PC2016-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2016-05070 (DEV2016-00040) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT GENERAL CONDITIONS 1 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1, (Site Plan, Elevations Plans), and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 2 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnities”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnities to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnities concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnities and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnities in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 3 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 4 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 2 A s s u m e d p r o p e r t y l i n e f o r v a r i a n c e j u s t i f i c a t i o n P r o p e r t y L i n e A T T A C H M E N T N O . 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 16, 2016 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05862 LOCATION: 5579 East Santa Ana Canyon Road (Pangaea Café) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Karen Aleman representing Pangaea Cafe; the agent is Chris Cachat representing K & M Properties LP; and the property owner is Kyong Kim, representing K & M Properties LP. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to permit the sale of beer and wine with a “Type 41” On Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC) license at an existing cafe which is located within a commercial shopping center (Pangaea Cafe in Alexander’s Grand Spa and Salon). RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05862. BACKGROUND: This 3-acre property is developed with a multi-tenant shopping center (Imperial Plaza). The cafe is located within Alexander’s Grand Spa and Salon, which is a tenant of the Imperial Plaza shopping center. The property is located in the "C-G" General Commercial zone and the General Plan designates the property for Neighborhood Center land uses. The property is also located within the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay zone. Surrounding land uses include single family homes across Old Santa Ana Canyon Road to the north, multi-tenant shopping complexes across Imperial Highway to the east and Santa Ana Canyon Road to the south, and a U.S. Post Office across Avenida Margarita to the west. The existing salon and cafe have been in operation since 1998. The applicant recently purchased the cafe in February 2016 and has been legally operating since that time. There are no active code enforcement cases on this property related to the operations of the cafe or salon. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05862 May 16, 2016 Page 2 of 3 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to add beer and wine sales for on-premises consumption to an existing café. The cafe would operate with a Type 41 (On Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place) license and would sell beer and wine in addition to fresh and prepared foods and non- alcoholic beverages. A Type 41 license is the same type of license used by restaurants that serve beer and wine in conjunction with bona fide meals, or food service. The primary use of the premises would remain as a salon, with food service available in conjunction with the service of beer and wine at the cafe. While the hours of operation for the salon are hours are 8:00 a.m. to 10:00 p.m. Tuesday through Thursday, 8:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Fridays, and 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Saturdays, the cafe’s hours of operation would continue to be 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Tuesday through Saturday. No interior or exterior changes to the tenant space are proposed. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. While cafés and salons are permitted by right in this zone, a conditional use permit is required to permit on-sale beer and wine to ensure compatibility with surrounding land uses. A determination of public convenience or necessity is not required by the City for a Type 41 ABC license. The number of alcohol licenses allowed in each of the City’s census tracts is regulated by ABC and is based upon population. The property is located within Census Tract No. 219.03, which has a population of 4,034 residents. This population allows for four on-sale licenses and presently there are four licenses within the tract. The property is located within Police Reporting District No. 1339, which has a crime rate that is below the citywide average. The crime rate within ¼ mile of this property has a crime rate that is 12% above the citywide average with calls for service during the past year consisting of 25 petty thefts, 10 simple assaults, and eight forgeries. The purpose of a conditional use permit is to analyze any potential impacts on adjacent properties and impose conditions of approval to ensure that any operational impacts would be minimal. Staff has evaluated the proposal and believes that, if properly conditioned to address potential impacts, beer and wine service at this location would be appropriate. Staff has provided conditions of approval in the attached resolution to ensure that the use would not have a negative impact on the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05862 May 16, 2016 Page 3 of 3 adjacent businesses in the area, including the Police Department’s recommended conditions intended to regulate the use. These conditions include the following: o No one under 18 years of age shall be allowed to sell beer and wine; o Requiring ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training for employees; o Prohibiting any exterior advertising of alcoholic beverages; o Sales of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises are prohibited; and o No distilled spirits are allowed under this ABC license. No increase in the parking requirement would occur since the cafe would continue to serve existing salon patrons and stylists. Based on these factors, staff believes that the proposed use would be compatible with the surrounding area and recommends approval of the conditional use permit. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff supports the requested conditional use permit to allow beer and wine sales for on-site consumption in conjunction with an existing cafe and salon within a commercial shopping center because the use would be consistent with similar surrounding uses. The recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the beer and wine sales would not have an adverse impact on the surrounding land uses. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Ashley Hefner Jonathan E. Borrego Contract Planner, RRM Design Group Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution 2. Applicant’s Request Letter 3. Police Department Memorandum 4. Plans 5. Photographs T (SC)POST OFFICE C-G (SC)RETAIL C-G (SC)RETAIL C-G (SC)RETAIL C-G (SC)RETAIL C-G (SC)RETAIL C-G (SC)FAIRFIELD INNANAHEIM HILLS T (SC)CANYON HIGHSCHOOL C -G (S C ) O F F I C E S C-G (SC)RETAIL C-G (SC)OFFICES R S -2 (S C ) S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2 (SC)SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 (SC)SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 (SC)SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 (SC)SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE N I M P E R I A L H W Y E SANTA ANA CANYON RD S I M P E R I A L H W Y E EDGEMAR AVE E OLD SANTA ANA CANYON RD S A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A N A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A E.NOHL R A N C H R D E. LA PALMA AVE N . I M P E R I A L H W Y E .S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D S . R O Y A L O A K R D E .L A P A L M A A V E 5579 East Santa Ana Canyon Road DEV No. 2016-00020 Subject Property APN: 358-051-07 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 N I M P E R I A L H W Y E SANTA ANA CANYON RD S I M P E R I A L H W Y E EDGEMAR AVE E OLD SANTA ANA CANYON RD S A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A N A V E N I D A M A R G A R I T A N E D G E M A R C I R E.NOHL R A N C H R D E. LA PALMA AVE N . I M P E R I A L H W Y E .S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D S . R O Y A L O A K R D E .L A P A L M A A V E 5579 East Santa Ana Canyon Road DEV No. 2016-00020 Subject Property APN: 358-051-07 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05862 FOR A TYPE 41 ON SALE BEER & WINE – EATING PLACE ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2016-00020) (5579 EAST SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05862 to permit the sale of beer and wine with a Type 41 (On Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place) license issued by the State of California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (herein referred to as "ABC") for on-premises consumption at an existing cafe within an existing salon (the "Proposed Project") located at 5579 East Santa Ana Canyon Road in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California (the "Property") within a retail commercial center generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Property is part of a 3-acre, approximately 43,148 square-foot multi- tenant commercial retail shopping center, which is located within the "C-NC" Neighborhood Center land use designation of the Anaheim General Plan. The Property is located in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); provided, however, that the requirements of the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone, as set forth in Chapter 18.18 (Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone) shall apply to the Property and supersede any inconsistent regulations of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 16, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Cal. Code Regs. tit. 14, § 15000; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the operation, repair, maintenance, permitting, leasing, licensing, or minor alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the - 2 - PC2016-*** CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the Proposed Project and, specifically, with respect to the request forConditional Use Permit No. 2016-05862, does find and determine the following: 1. The request to allow the sale of beer and wine with a Type 41 (On-Sale Beer & Wine – Eating Place) license for on-premises consumption in conjunction with an existing cafe is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the Scenic Corridor (SC) Overlay Zone pursuant to Section 18.18.090 (Commercial Zones – Standards) of the Code; 2. The request to permit the sale of beer and wine for on-premises consumption in conjunction with an existing cafe would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Property is already developed with a multi-tenant commercial building and the proposed use would be compatible with the existing uses within the shopping center and surrounding area. 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Property is already improved with a multi-tenant commercial building and no expansion to the existing building or use is proposed. 4. The traffic generated by permitting the sale of beer and wine for on-premises consumption in conjunction with a cafe would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the Property are consistent with the existing commercial use of the Property and the permitted businesses within the commercial center. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05862 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the Proposed Project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05862, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05862 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City - 3 - PC2016-*** of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 4 - PC2016-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2016-*** - 6 - PC2016-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05862 (DEV2016-00020) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT CAFE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 1. No person under the age of 18 shall sell or serve alcoholic beverages. Police Department 2. That subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code. Police Department 3. At all times when the premise is open for business, the premise shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. Police Department 4. Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. Police Department 5. Managers / Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training for themselves and service employees. The number is 714-558-4101. Police Department 6. The door(s) shall be kept closed at all times during the operation of the premises except in cases of emergency. Said door(s) not to consist solely of a screen or ventilated security door. Police Department 7. There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Police Department 8. Applicant shall post clearly visible signs that read “No Alcoholic Beverages Beyond This Point” at any exit door that leads outside the main building. Police Department 9. Identification must be shown with each purchase. A patron may not purchase alcohol for other guests unless each person is at the register and has provided proper identification. Police Department - 7 - PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10. Sales of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises are prohibited. Police Department 11. No distilled spirits are allowed under this ABC license. Police Department 12. Beer and wine are to be sold in clear plastic cups (no glass containers) that are clearly distinguishable from the other non-alcoholic drinks available for purchase. Police Department COMMERCIAL RETAIL CENTER CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 13. Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police Department 14. The owner of the commercial center shall be responsible for maintaining the commercial center in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the buildings making up the subject Property shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning and Building Department, Code Enforcement Division GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 15. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division - 8 - PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 16. The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 17. The subject Property shall be developed, used and maintained substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 AT T A C H M E N T NO. 4 3/31/2016 1 Parking Lot Building Exterior ATTACHMENT NO. 5 3/31/2016 2 Front Entrance Café 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 16, 2016 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A LOCATION: 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934 through 950 North Keystone Street (Servite High School) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is James Carter representing the property owner, Servite High School. REQUEST: The applicant requests to amend a previously-approved conditional use permit and variance to modify plans for a proposed aquatic center on four residential lots on the west side of the Servite High School campus with a side yard setback less than permitted by Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that the previously-approved Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request, and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and Variance No. 2013-04957A. BACKGROUND: This 14.5-acre property is developed with the Servite High School campus. The four properties on Keystone Street, to be consolidated into the campus, are developed with three single family homes and a vacant parcel. The zoning for the high school property is “T” (Transition). The zoning for the single family homes is “RS-2” (Single Family Residential). The General Plan designates the school property for School land uses and the four residential properties for Low Density Residential land uses. The campus is surrounded by single family homes on all four sides. Prior Zoning Entitlements: Conditional Use Permit No. 922, to permit the expansion of an existing private high school, was approved by the Commission in 1967. Conditional Use Permit No. 3880, to permit a school expansion for a maximum of 850 students with less parking than required by Code was approved by the Commission in 1996. This permit was amended in 2002 to permit the construction of a new employee parking lot. Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05104, to permit three additional modular classroom buildings, was approved by the Commission in 2007. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A May 16, 2016 Page 2 of 6 Conditional Use Permit 2012-05650 and Variance 2013-04957 was approved by Planning Commission in February 2014. These entitlements included the following components: (CUP) to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements; demolish four single family homes and construct and operate an aquatics center including lights for evening use and bleachers on the site of the existing residences to be demolished; reorient the existing baseball field with home plate being relocated to the southwest corner of the property and construct an adjacent team room, storage, restrooms, and a concession stand; erect a 30-foot high fence along the right and left-field edges of the reconfigured baseball field; erect field lighting for the baseball field; construct a 10-foot high block wall along the south and west property lines; relocate the music and weight room buildings to the site of the existing swimming pool in the central part of the campus; and replace field lighting for the track and football/soccer field; and (VAR) to permit a reduced front yard setback along Keystone Street, to provide fewer parking spaces than required by Code, and fencing that is higher than permitted by Code. Following the Planning Commission’s approval of the above-described entitlements in 2014, one of the five residential parcels on Keystone Street (954 Keystone Street) fell out of escrow and is no longer included in the project. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to shift the location of the previously- approved aquatics center that would be located where three single-family residences (934, 944, and 950 North Keystone Street) and one vacant lot (940 North Keystone Street) currently exist. The properties are currently owned by the school and the existing homes would be demolished. The previously approved project included a fifth parcel along Keystone Street (954 North Keystone Street) that the school was unable to acquire and is no longer part of the project. Because this northern parcel along Keystone Drive is no longer available, the applicant was forced to shift the location of the aquatics center southward. There are no changes to the operation of the aquatics center as approved in 2014. Proposed hours would remain from 6:30 a.m. to 6:30 p.m. Water polo games and swim meets would be held after school on weekdays, and occasionally on Saturdays. These activities typically take place during the months of March through May, September and October. The amended design of the aquatics center would include an Olympic-size pool, bleachers for up to 450 spectators, and a pool equipment building. As originally approved, the back side of the 10-foot high bleacher wall would still face Keystone Street. Layered landscaping and a “green screen” façade with planted vines remain proposed on this wall as a means to screen the bleachers as viewed from the adjacent residential neighborhood. The pool building would include a locker room, equipment rooms, storage, and concession stand. The pool building would be located with a no setback abutting the existing single-family lot to the south (930 North Keystone Street). A 12- foot tall, solid concrete block building wall would abut the single family residence to the south and would not contain any windows or doors. The previously approved project included a new driveway opening on Keystone Street to provide access to an accessory parking lot with 21 spaces. The revised proposal does not include any vehicular and pedestrian access from Keystone Street. The relocated employee parking spaces would be accessed from La Palma Avenue through the main campus and would be located between the aquatic center and the existing classrooms. To compensate for the loss of the southerly parking lot, the applicant proposes to provide an additional 19 parking spaces in the employee parking areas adjacent to the aquatic center at the center of the campus. Access to the complex would only be allowed through the main campus in order to discourage visitors, employees, and students from parking in the neighborhood. Lighting for evening use of the pool would be installed on four 60-foot high light poles that surround the pool. No changes are proposed to the previously approved variances for the 8-foot high block wall along CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A May 16, 2016 Page 3 of 6 the north boundary of the aquatics center and for the front setback of 12 feet for the bleacher wall along Keystone Street where 25 feet is required. The revised design of the aquatic center requires an additional variance for the proposed pool building with a no side yard setback adjacent to a single family residence on the south side of the aquatics center where Code requires a minimum setback of five feet. Site Plan CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A May 16, 2016 Page 4 of 6 ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: (1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; (2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; (3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; (4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and (5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit for the expansion of the school campus in this zone. The purpose of the conditional use permit is to ensure compatibility with surrounding residential uses. Because the school is surrounded by single family homes adjacent to the areas to be modified, the proposed expansion project has been designed to minimize impacts to the surrounding neighborhood. For example, the applicant proposes to screen the rear of the bleachers facing Keystone Street with a “green screen,” consisting of an attached trellis with vines. To ensure that the aquatic center does not impact the surrounding neighborhood, access to the aquatics complex would be from the interior campus only. Nighttime hours would be limited for all aquatic events and all activity would end by 6:30 p.m. so as to prevent late night noise and lighting impacts on the adjacent residences during evening hours. Conditions of approval limiting such activities remain from the prior resolution in the attached draft resolution. A solid block wall with no doors or windows would be constructed adjacent to the single family homes to help attenuate noise. As further described in the Environmental Impact Review paragraph of this report, the applicant is also taking steps to minimize light glare impacts upon the adjacent residential community. Based on these design features and operational measures, staff recommends approval of this aspect of the requested amendment to the conditional use permit. Aquatic Center building wall, as viewed from Keystone Street CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A May 16, 2016 Page 5 of 6 Setback Variance: Before the Planning Commission may approve a variance, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that the following conditions exist: (1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; (2) That, because of the special circumstances, shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. The revised design of the aquatic center requires an additional variance request for the proposed pool building with no setback adjacent to a single family residence on the south side of the aquatics center where Code requires a minimum setback of five feet. No changes are proposed to the previously approved variances for the 8-foot high block wall along the north boundary of the aquatics center and for the front setback of 12 feet for the bleacher wall along Keystone Street where 25 feet is required. The main high school campus is located in the T zone, but the aquatics complex is located in the RS-2 zone. The setback restrictions are based on its underlying RS-2 zone designation. The side yard setback requirement, which typically apply to the development of residential structures, is intended to ensure that an appropriate open yard area is maintained between residential structures. The pool building, proposed with no setback, abuts a single family residence to the south. The building wall contains no openings and abuts the garage of the neighboring residence. In addition, the applicant has contacted the abutting property owner and has obtained a letter of support provided in the report attachments. The 12-foot high building wall will reduce noise and provide a buffer from the residence to the south. Staff believes that findings exist for the granting of the requested setback variance due to unique circumstances that apply to the RS-2 zoned properties along Keystone Street. These properties are unique in that their applicable development standards are intended to address the development of residential structures. This residential standard limits the applicant’s ability to build standard size Olympic pool and ancillary pool building. In addition, the 12-foot solid pool building wall would provide an increased buffer from the abutting residential use while maintaining full usability of the Olympic-sized pool and aquatic center for the students. Based on these reasons, staff recommends approval of this setback variance request. Environmental Impact Review: A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) was previously prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the previously approved project and to identify necessary mitigation measures. The MND was circulated for a 30-day public review period between December 16, 2013 and January 17, 2014. No comments were received during this 30-day review period. Mitigation measures had been identified in the MND and a Mitigation Monitoring Program had been prepared and was adopted by the Planning Commission to ensure that the mitigation measures identified in the MND were implemented. These measures were included in the previously approved resolution. The MND concluded that there were no remaining potentially significant adverse impacts related to the project. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A May 16, 2016 Page 6 of 6 CONCLUSION: The proposed development is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code. Servite High School is an asset to the community and the modification to the proposed aquatic center has been designed to minimize impacts on the surrounding neighborhood. Staff recommends approval of the amendment to the conditional use permit and variance. Prepared by, Submitted by, Kevin Clausen Quiroz Jonathan E. Borrego Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Development Summary Table 2. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution 3. Letter of Request 4. Neighbor’s Letter of Support 5. Previously approved Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution 6. Photographs 7. Plans RM-4SEA WIND APARTMENTS91 DU RM-4GLENOAKSAPARTMENTS106 DU RM-4DUPLEX TSERVITEHIGH SCHOOL R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-4 FOURPLEX RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-2ATTACHED CONDOS64 DU RM-3DETACHED CONDOS137 DU TPRESCHOOL RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE W LA PALMA AVE W CATALPA AVE W GLENOAKS AVE N F A I R V I E W S T N W I C H I T A S T N O N O N D A G A A V E N C H I P P E W A A V E N K E Y S T O N E S T W DOGWOOD AVE W DOGWOOD AVE W ADMIRAL LNW FALMOUTH AVE N OUTRIGGER WAY W. LA PALMA AVE N . E U C L I D S T N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . L O A R A S T W. ROMNEYA DR 1952 West La Palma Avenue &934-950 N. Keystone Street DEV No. 2012-00053A Subject Property APN: 072-131-01072-463-03072-463-04072-463-05072-463-06 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 W LA PALMA AVE W CATALPA AVE W GLENOAKS AVE N F A I R V I E W S T N W I C H I T A S T N O N O N D A G A A V E N C H I P P E W A A V E N K E Y S T O N E S T W DOGWOOD AVE W DOGWOOD AVE W ADMIRAL LNW FALMOUTH AVE N OUTRIGGER WAY W. LA PALMA AVE N . E U C L I D S T N . B R O O K H U R S T S T N . L O A R A S T W. ROMNEYA DR 1952 West La Palma Avenue &934-950 N. Keystone Street DEV No. 2012-00053A Subject Property APN: 072-131-01072-463-03072-463-04072-463-05072-463-06 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY DEV2012-00053A Development Standard Previously Approved Proposed Project Code Requirement Site Area 15.52 acres 15.34 acres --- Front Yard Setback – Keystone Street 12 feet 12 feet 25 feet required Side Yard Setback – Abutting residence to the south 64 feet 0 feet 5 feet required Side Yard Fencing 8 feet high 8 feet high 6 feet high Building Height 12 feet 12 feet 35 feet maximum Parking 344 parking spaces justified through a parking study 363 parking spaces 575 parking spaces ATTACHMENT NO. 1 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650 AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2012-00053A) (1952 WEST LA PALMA AVENUE AND 934-950 NORTH KEYSTONE STREET) WHEREAS, on March 9, 1967, and subject to certain conditions of approval, the Anaheim Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as the "Planning Commission"), by its Resolution No. PC67-42, did approve Conditional Use Permit No. 922 to permit the expansion of an existing private school on that certain real property located at 1952 West La Palma Avenue and 934-954 North Keystone Street in the City of Anaheim, generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, on September 8, 1988, the Anaheim Zoning Administrator, by its Resolution No. ZA88-53, approved Variance No. 3833 to permit an existing patio cover with waiver of minimum structural setback; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 1996, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC96- 30, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3824 to permit a baseball storage room at an existing private high school; and WHEREAS, on November 25, 1996, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC96-119, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 3880 to permit a new 2-story classroom addition and remodel an existing classroom building in conjunction with an existing private school with waivers of maximum structural height and minimum number of parking spaces. On September 23, 2002, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2002-142, approved an amendment to this permit to construct a new parking lot on two adjoining single family residential zoned lots; and WHEREAS, on October 11, 1999, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC99-181, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 4154 to permit a freestanding electronic readerboard sign in conjunction with an existing private high school; and WHEREAS, on June 26, 2006, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2006- 60, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05104 to permit two modular classroom buildings in conjunction with the existing private high school. On August 20, 2007, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2007-101, approved an amendment to this permit to permit an additional modular classroom building; and WHEREAS, on February 10, 2014, and subject to certain conditions of approval, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2014-018, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05104 and Variance No. 2013-04957 (the "Original CUP") to retain an existing student enrollment that is higher than permitted under previous entitlements and to expand the existing - 2 - PC2016-*** Servite High School campus to include the demolition of four single family homes, construction of a new aquatics center and parking lot, reorientation of the existing baseball field with 30-foot high fencing and 10-foot high block walls, relocation of the music and weight room buildings, replacement lighting for the track and football field, and consolidation of the five parcels along Keystone Street into the main school campus property and Variance No. 2013-04957 to permit a reduced front yard setback along Keystone Street, fencing that is higher than permitted by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the “Code”), and less parking than required by the Code at subject Property, pursuant to Section 18.60.190 of the Code for the Property. The conditions of approval which were the subject of the Original CUP and Variance No. 2013-04957 shall be referred to herein as the "Previous Conditions of Approval"; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified petition to approve an amendment to the Original CUP and Variance No. 2013-04957, designated as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A" and “Variance No.2013-04957”, respectively, to modify plans for a proposed aquatic center on four residential lots on the west side of the Servite High School campus with a side yard setback less than permitted by the Code at the subject Property, pursuant to Section 18.60.190 of the Code for the Property (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 15.3-acres in size and is developed with the Servite High School campus. The four properties on Keystone Street to be consolidated into the campus are developed with three single family homes and a vacant parcel. The zoning for the high school property is “T” Transition. The four residential parcels are zoned “RS-2” Single Family Residential. The General Plan designates the school property for School land uses and the five residential properties for Low Density Residential land uses, which zoning permits school uses. As such, the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.04 (Single Family Residential Zone) of the Code; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by Resolution No. 95R-134 and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and Variance No. 2013-04957A, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, and because the Initial Study identified potentially significant impacts, a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") was prepared to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of project which was the subject of the Original CUP and Variance No. 2013-04957. in connection with the school expansion project in 2014. A complete copy of the Initial Study and MND is on file and can be viewed in the City's Planning Department and is also available for purchase; and - 3 - PC2016-*** WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, a Mitigation Monitoring Program ("MMP") was prepared for the Project that was the subject of the MND and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Original CUP and Variance No. 2013-04957; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 16, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of the MND and for and against the proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, to the extent authorized by law, the Planning Commission desires and intends to use the MND as the environmental documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the MND and the MMP, and the evidence received to date, does find and determine that the MND is all that is necessary in connection with the Proposed Project and its approval and that none of the conditions set forth in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental negative declaration have occurred; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit the proposed Project is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under subsection .010 of Section 18.04.030 (Educational Institutions– General) of the Code. 2. The proposed Project will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the Proposed Project has been designed to be compatible with surrounding residential uses and mitigation measures have been included to reduce or eliminate and potential adverse impacts. 3. The size and shape of the site for the proposed Project is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. 4. The traffic generated by the proposed Project will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the vehicular circulation is designed to minimize impacts on the surrounding properties. - 4 - PC2016-*** 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Variance No. 2013-04957A for a reduced side yard, does find and determine the following facts: SECTION NO. 18.04.100.010 Minimum side yard setback. (5 feet required; 0 feet proposed) 1. There are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because unique circumstances apply to the properties along Keystone Street. These properties are unique in that the RS-2 zone development standards, including the applicable setback and fence height requirements, are intended to address the development of residential structures. These residential standards limit the applicant’s ability to build a standard sized Olympic pool and ancillary pool building with locker rooms, restrooms, equipment rooms, and storage. Although encroaching into a required setback area, the height of the pool building wall will buffer the noise from the aquatic center to the surrounding neighborhood. 2. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because the school use is unique among other RS-2 zoned properties in the vicinity. This makes it difficult to meet all of the development standards while providing adequate setbacks for the proposed use. Compliance with the required minimum side setback would also further reduce the size of the pool below Olympic-size standards and limit the size of ancillary pool building uses. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and Variance No. 2013-04957A contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Revised Conditions of Approval"). - 5 - PC2016-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, effective upon the effective date of this Resolution, the Revised Conditions of Approval hereby amend the Previous Conditions of Approval and hereby replace the Previous Conditions of Approval in their entirety. All references to the conditions of approval for the Original CUP and Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and for Variance No. 2013-04957 and Variance No. 2013-04957A shall be to the Revised Conditions of Approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B, which shall control and govern the Original CUP, as amended by Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A, and Variance No. 2013-04957, as amended by Variance No. 2013-04957A. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Revised Conditions of Approval, as they relate to the uses permitted under Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and Variance No. 2013- 04957A are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval that relate to the uses permitted under Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and Variance No. 2013-04957A may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and Variance No. 2013-04957A are approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05650A and Variance No. 2013-04957A constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that they comply with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 6 - PC2016-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a resolution of the City Council in the event of an appeal. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 7 - PC2016-*** - 8 - PC2016-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05650A AND VARIANCE NO. 2013-04957A (DEV2012-00053A) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 1 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering Division 2 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering Division 3 The owner shall submit detailed lighting plans demonstrating light levels (horizontal and vertical) along adjacent residential property lines. Light levels that exceed 2.0 footcandles at any portion of a residential property line shall trigger the following offers: • Servite High School shall provide an offer to fund blinds, shutters or other means acceptable to the homeowners to block spillover light from entering ballfield-facing windows. This offer shall be made to the homeowners 60 days prior to and payment made at least 30 days prior to the first lighting of the field. A homeowner’s refusal to accept payment shall not be considered Servite’s failure to accomplish this mitigation requirement. Any written documentation pertaining to this mitigation measure shall be provided to the Planning Department. • The mitigation payment shall not exceed $2,000 per impacted residences. • This mitigation applies to the following addresses, or as revised pursuant to the final lighting plans: 930, 924, 920, 914 and 910 N. Keystone and 1939 W. Catalpa Avenue. • After initial completion, each luminaire and shields affixed on the pole shall be situated and adjusted so that lighting levels on residential property lines are minimized and are compliance with the final detailed lighting plans submitted to the City. After the appropriate burn-in time for the lights, Servite High School shall take measurements to confirm these levels have been achieved and submit same to the Planning Department. MM Aesthetics 1 Planning Department - 9 - PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 4 Servite High School shall program evening use of the aquatic center and baseball field so that lights are turned off by 7:00 p.m. and 9:30 p.m., respectively, consistent with the Event Management Plan. Planning Department 5 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: • The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. • Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. • Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. • A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. MM Cultural Resources 2 Planning Department 6 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: • The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. • Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to the Cooper Center at California State University Fullerton. • Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor Planning Department - 10 - PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT can survey the area. MM Cultural Resources 3 7 The building shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or audible). Police Department 8 Any necessary address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers should be visible during hours of darkness. Police Department 9 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Police Department 10 The rear doors of the premises shall be numbered with the same address numbers or suite number of the business. Minimum height of 4 inches is recommended. Police Department 11 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. Police Department 12 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 13 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Di vision of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 14 This is a project with a landscaping area exceeding 2,500 square feet. A Landscape Documentation Package and a Certification of Completion are required and a separate irrigation meter shall be installed in compliance with Chapter 10.19 of Anaheim Municipal Code and Ordinance No. 6160 relating to landscape water efficiency. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 15 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use if necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division - 11 - PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT abandon any water service or fire line. 16 The owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City (i) an easement for all large domestic above ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad, (ii) a twenty foot wide easement for all water service laterals to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls, or other landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair, or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement, and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the owner and included and recorded. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 17 The owner shall submit to the Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 18 The existing 4-inch backflow prevention device on the 4-inch water meter and the existing 4-inch backflow on the 4-inch service serving the property are substandard and shall be replaced. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 19 Unless the owner intends to use them, the owner shall abandon all existing water services to address 934-954 N. Keystone Street at the City main per City standards. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 20 There exists a capped municipal water well approximately five feet below the finished surface at 938 N. Keystone Street. The owner shall comply with State and City requirements when excavating in the vicinity of the capped well. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 21 Trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage areas shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets or highways. The walls of the storage areas shall be protected from graffiti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum 1-gallon size clinging vines planted on maximum 3-foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Public Works-Streets and Sanitation Division - 12 - PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 22 Prior to issuance of the grading permit, the applicant shall submit to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval a Water Quality Management Plan that conforms to current Orange County Guidelines and Requirements as well as the City’s WQMP Review Checklist. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 23 Street improvement plans shall be submitted for all parkway related improvements adjacent to the project site to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division for review and approval. These plans shall show both sides of all streets and alleys adjacent to the property, including all driveways and utility installations, signing and striping. Parkway landscaping shall be irrigated from the on-site water main. All improvements shall be installed and completed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 24 A bond securing the completion of the public improvements shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney. Public Works Department, Development Services Division PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 25 Ongoing during construction of the project, all construction traffic shall use La Palma Avenue to access and egress the site. No construction traffic shall use residential streets, except for street improvements that may be necessary on Keystone Street. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 26 All required WQMP items shall be inspected and operational. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 27 An all-weather access road as approved by the Fire Department shall be provided during construction. Fire Department GENERAL CONDITIONS 28 The maximum school enrollment shall not exceed 950 students. Planning Department 29 The school shall be operated in accordance with the two parking studies, prepared by the IBI Group and The Planning Center, and the Parking Management Plan, prepared by the applicant, that were submitted as part of this application. Any changes to these plans shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with these documents to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning Department 30 Access to the aquatic complex and sports fields shall be from the interior campus only. Planning Department - 13 - PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 31 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Police Department 32 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 33 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 34 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department 35 The Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning Department 36 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department 18401 Von Karman Avenue Suite 110 Irvine California 92612 tel (949) 833-5588 fax (949) 833-5511 21 April 2016 Mr. Dave See Senior Planner City Of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92803 Re: PRE2012-00004 1952 W. La Palma Avenue Servite High School REQUEST for VARIANCE: SIDEYARD SETBACK ADJACENT TO RESIDENTIAL LOT 96 AND PERPENDICULAR TO KEYSTONE STREET, CODE SECTION 18.04.100 Overview: In review of the Conceptual Development Application, the City of Anaheim is requiring Servite High School to obtain a variance for the setback adjacent to residential Lot 96 and perpendicular to Keystone Street. Per Zoning Code Section 18.04.100, the minimum structural setback in zone RS-2 is 5 feet. The revised site plan indicates a proposed setback of 1’-0” to the face of the Aquatics Center perimeter wall. The reasons for this requested setback are described below. 1. Special physical characteristics of the property that cause the requested development to not meet Zoning Code Section 18.04.100 for RS-2 zones. ● The Aquatic Center and Parking Lot C (21 spaces) was approved on 5 residential lots. Lot 101 (north of the property) wasn’t purchased by Servite as originally intended and the building had to be relocated south adjacent to Lot 96 property line without the parking lot. The project was originally approved with a 10’-0” CMU wall (fence) at the property line adjacent to Lot 96. ● The solution allows Servite to make only minor changes to the Aquatic Center footprint to reconcile the new south adjacency conditions. 2. The following aspects of the site revision incorporate the following features and offer mitigating aspects for the overall project. ● Southerly Parking Lot C relocated to Lot E. ● No added traffic proposed on Keystone. Summary: The school administration recognizes the importance of planning and set out seeking a balance between the community neighborhood and the campus needs. The proposed design solution and campus’ management of the facility mitigates any negative impact on the neighborhood: ● The proposed 12’-0” high building to be located at the south property is 2’ higher than the originally proposed 10’-0” high wall adjacent to a parking lot. ● Traffic patterns will be improved with the removal of the south Parking Lot. All users will park in the existing on-site Lot at the northeast corner of the campus. The small parking lot to the south proposed facility is eliminated. ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Mr. David See Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planning Department 2 ● Servite is in negotiations to buy 930 Keystone house for school use purposes only. Based upon the above mitigation elements and existing site constraints, we request the City of Anaheim to grant the set-back variance. Should you require additional information or wish to discuss any aspects of this variance request, please do not hesitate to contact me immediately. Respectfully, IBI GROUP Thomas R. Moore AIA LEED AP Managing Principal/Architect of Record Mobile (949) 285-2421 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 AT T A C H M E N T NO . 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 Aerial Photograph Source: Google Earth Pro 2013 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 3 0 Scale (Feet) 350 Existing School Boundary 1. Introduction Campus Expansion W La Palma Ave W Catalpa Ave W Glenoaks Ave W Dogwood Ave N O n o n d a g a A v e N C h i p p e w a A v e N W i c h i t a S t N K e y s t o n e S t N F a i r v i e w S t N F e r n S t 5 Residential Residential Residential Residential Marshall Park N W i c h i t a S t rev1 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 Campus Site Plan 1. Introduction Source: IBI Group 2012 Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 6 0 Scale (Feet) 130 W L a P a l m a A v e Existing School Boundary Campus Expansion Light Poles 38' - 0 " 2 6 ' - 0 " 298 ' - 0 " 26 ' - 0 " 13 2 . 3 3 38' - 0 " 13 2 . 3 1 13 2 . 0 0 18' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " R 5 0 ' - 0 " 20 ' - 0 " FH FH FH FH FHFH FH 2 1 ' - 6 3 / 8 " 20' - 0 " ST A F F P A R K I N G AR E A 1 - 2 7 S P A C E S PA R K I N G AR E A 2 - 5 2 S P A C E S 1 7 ' - 5 3 / 4 " KB KB F I R E L A N E EX I S T I N G BL D G EX I S T I N G BL D G EX I S T I N G BL D G EX I S T I N G BL D G EX I S T I N G BLD G EX I S T I N G BL D G EX I S T I N G CO V E R E D AR E A 30' - 0 " BIK E R A C K (N E W ) F H WE I G H T P A V I L I O N PE R M I T # B L D 2 0 1 5 - 0 4 1 1 8 MO D U L A R C L A S S R O O M B L D G PE R M I T # B L D 2 0 1 5 - 0 5 4 9 0 15' - 1 0 7 / 8 " 4' - 3 3 / 8 " 5 ' - 7 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4 ' - 0 " 84 ' - 0 " 26' - 9 1 / 4 " 3 ' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 4 ' - 4 3 / 8 " Existing Student Lot A (258 Spaces) Existing Saff Lot B (55 Spaces) New Aquatic Center New Staff Lot D (27 Spaces) New Lot E (49 Spaces) Reoriented Baseball Field Existing Football/Soccer Field & Track N Whichita St. Keystone St. REV 1 Site Plan, Aquatics Center Servite High School Improvement Project Initial Study The Planning Center|DC&E • Figure 8 0 Scale (Feet) 25 1. Introduction Existing School Boundary Campus Expansion Light PolesSource: IBI Group 2012 20 STAFFPARKING EXISTING BUILDING EXISTINGBUILDING P5-A PAVERSTYPE I P2 - SITECONCRETE SLAB P5-B PAVERSTYPE II 9' - 0 " T Y P . 18' - 0" 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 1 / 8 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 7' - 8 1 / 8 " 9' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 6' - 3 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 28' - 0"18' - 0" 27' - 2 " P4 P4 P4 P4 P2 P2 P2 P4 P2 P5-BP5-A P7 P3 32' - 6 3 / 4 " 14' - 4 " Pool Size (55 m x 25 yd) Aquatic Center Building Building Area :4,555 sf Type: 5B N K e y s t o n e S t 4'-0" 30'-0" 8'-0" 8'-0" Parkway 4'-0" sidewak 12'-0" Setback R.O.W. Rev 1 38' - 0" 26' - 0 " 298' - 0" 26' - 0" 132.33 38' - 0" 132.31 132.00 18' - 0" 20' - 0" R 50' - 0" 20' - 0" FH FH FH FH FH FH FH 21' - 6 3 / 8 " 20' - 0" R 50 ' - 0" R 70' - 0" STAFF PARKING AREA 1- 27 SPACES PARKING AREA 2- 52 SPACES R 3 0 0' - 0 "R 3 0 0 ' - 0 " R 300' - 0" R 300' - 0" R 300' - 0" 17 ' - 5 3 / 4 " KB KB FIR E L A N E EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGBLDGEXISTINGBLDG EXISTINGCOVEREDAREA 30' - 0"R 5 6 ' - 0 " BIKE RACK (NEW) FH R 3 0 0 ' - 0 " WEIGHT PAVILIONPERMIT# BLD2015-04118MODULAR CLASSROOM BLDGPERMIT# BLD2015-05490 15' - 10 7/8" 4' - 3 3/8" 5' - 7 1 / 2 " 4' - 1 1 1 / 2 " 4' - 0 " 84' - 0"26' - 9 1/4" 3' - 1 1 3 / 4 " 4' - 4 3 / 8 " CONTROL JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2B/SP-11 EXPANSION JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2A & 2C/SP-11 TOP OF CLEAN-OUT, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11 CJ EJ TOP OF SLOT DRAIN, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11TSD TCO SURGE CHAMBER ACCESS COVER, SEE DETAIL 5/SP-6SCA HOSE BIBB, SEE DETAIL 7/SP-10HB ACCESSIBLE LIFT, SEE DETAIL 2/SP-8AL COLD WATERCW SLOPE DIRECTION TO DRAINSL. WATER LEVELWL TOP OF DECKTD TOP OF FINISH FLOORTFF INVERT ELEVATIONI.E. POINT OF CONNECTIONP.O.C. STORM DRAINSD TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAILTR CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE LANDSCAPE PERMANENT ASPHALT PAVING PAINTED WARNING STRIPES ON ASPHALT PAVING FIRE LANE, PAINTED RED CURB ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PAINTEDPNT GALVANIZEDGV PERMEABLE CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE DECOMPOSED GRANITE - DG PAVERS TYPE I APPROX. SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE P1 P2 P3 P4 P5- I P5- II PAVERS TYPE II P6 P7 FIRE HYDRANTFH FENCE STATION MARKA# AREA DRAIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETSAD CATCH BASIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETSCB KNOX BOXKB 1. FENCING, GATE AND SIGNAGE PLAN REFER TO A1002.2. PAVING PLAN REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS, A1003, A1004 AND A20013. 6" THICK CONCRETE POOL DECKS W/ #4 REBAR AT 12" O.C. EACHWAY, SHALL HAVE MEDIUM BROOM, NON-SLIP FINISH AND SHALL SLOPE AT 2% MAX. IN ANY DIRECTION4. FIRE ACCESS PLAN REFER TO A1001 5. ALL WORK SHOWN IS NEW UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.6. PATH OF TRAVEL (P.O.T.) AS INDICATED IS A BARRIER FREE ACCESSROUTE WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES EXCEEDING 1/2"BEVELED AT 1:2 MAXIMUM SLOPE, EXCEPT THAT LEVEL CHANGES DONOT EXCEED 1/4" VERTICAL AND IS AT LEAST 48" WIDE. SURFACE ISSLIP RESISTANT, STABLE AND FIRM. CROSS-SLOPE DOES NOTEXCEED 2% AND SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN5 % UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. (POT) SHALL BE MAINTAINEDFREE OF OVERHANGING OBSTRUCTIONS TO 80" MINIMUM (1133B.8.2)AND PROTRUDING OBJECTS GREATER THAN 4" PROJECTION FROMWALL AND ABOVE 27" AND LESS THAN 80" (1133B.8.6) ARCHITECT SHALL TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO BARRIERS IN THE PATH OFTRAVEL. 7. SIGNAGE @ PAINTED RED CURB: "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" 4" HEIGHTWHITE LETTERS STENCILED ON CURB 25' O.C. TYP.8. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONINCLUDING GRADING, UTILITIES, PAVING, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICALCONTROLS AND LIMIT OF WORK.9. NEATLY SAWCUT ASPHALT & CONCRETE PAVING TO BE REMOVEDFOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, LOCATIONS OFEXISTING STREETS, AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB PRIOR TO THESTART OF WORK OR PORTIONS OF WORK.10. CONTRACTOR TO BECOME THOROUGHLY FAMILIAR WITH ALLASPECTS OF THE WORK. 11. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIESBETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS & CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENTS.12. SAWCUT, PATCH, & REPLACE EXISTING PAVING AS REQUIRED FORNEW UTILITY SERVICE & ALL OTHER UNDERGROUND WORK.13. DRIVE PAVEMENTS OVER BASE, REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORTAND CIVIL DRAWINGS.14. REFER TO CIVIL SHEETS FOR LAYOUT OF BUILDINGS WITH RESPECTTO PROPERTY LINES15. REFER TO CIVIL SHEETS FOR OFFSITE WORK.16. PROVIDE MINIMUM 2-A:10-B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AT EACHBUILDING. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY FIRE DEPARTMENTINSPECTOR. CFC 906 17. PROVIDE MEANSKNOX ACCESS DEVICES AT GATES AS NOTED. FINALLOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY ANAHEIM FIRE DEPARTMENT 18. INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL OF ABOVEGROUND/UNDERGROUNDSTORAGE TANKS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT SHALL BEAPPROVED BY ANAHEIM FIRE DEPARTMENT UNDER SEPARATEREVIEW. AREAS VANPROVIDEDMIN. REQ.SPACES TABLE 11B-208.2 PARKING SPACES CALCULATION 1 02502 12227 2 DATE: ISSUE SHEET TITLE PROJECT Any reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Groupis forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions onthe job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions andconditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Groupfor approval before proceeding with fabrication. SCALE: CHKD' BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: SHEET NUMBER PRIME CONSULTANT SUB CONSULTANT SEAL CLIENT COPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUP COPYRIGHT: ISSUES A 1 B C D E 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E ibigroup.com 1952 West La Palma AvenueAnaheim, California 92801 Landscape:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners 31742 Coast HighwayLaguna Beach, CA 92651Phone:949-645-9444 Electrical Engineer:FBA Consulting Engineers150 Paularino Ave. Ste. A120Costa Mesa, CA 92660 Phone:949-852-9995 Civil Engineer: FUSCOE Engineering2850 Inland Empire Blvd, Ste B Ontario, CA 91764Phone:909-581-0676 Aquatic Engineer: AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP2850 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008Phone:760-438-8400 Structure Engineers:Petra20381 Lake Forest Drive Suite B15 Lake Forest, CA 92630Phone: 949-329-1049 M&P Engineers:Fundament & Associates26 Executive Park, Ste. 100Irvine, CA 92614 GeoTechnical:Koury Geotechnical Services INC.14280 Euclid Ave.Chino, CA 91710Phone: 909-606-611 SUB CONSULTANTS: IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110Irvine CA 92612tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 As indicated CAMPUS SITE PLAN AND FIRE ACCESS 29957 Author 07/22/14 A1001 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Checker 1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A1001 Scale: 1" = 40'-0" 1 00-Site_Plan N SITE LEGEND SITE NOTES APPROX. SCOPE PF WORK NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE ASK REVISIONS 1 2 8' - 0" A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 250 ' - 0 " 0' - 8 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 11' - 4 " 38' - 0 " 32' - 0 " 8' - 0 " 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 184.6 5.6 6.8 139.8 15.2 172.4 B.6 8.4 A2002 2 A2003 1 C.4 D.3 20 STAFF PARKING A1104 1 EXISTINGBUILDING EXISTING BUILDING P5-A PAVERSTYPE I P2 - SITECONCRETE SLAB P5-B PAVERS TYPE II 9' - 0 " T Y P . 18' - 0" 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 1 / 8 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 7' - 8 1 / 8 " 9' - 0 " 6' - 6 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 5' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 6' - 3 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 9' - 0 " 28' - 0"18' - 0" 27' - 2 " P4 P4 P4 P4 P2 P2 P2 P4 P2 P5-BP5-A P7 P3 32' - 6 3 / 4 " 14' - 4 " A1009 7 CONTROL JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2B/SP-11 EXPANSION JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2A & 2C/SP-11 TOP OF CLEAN-OUT, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11 CJ EJ TOP OF SLOT DRAIN, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11TSD TCO SURGE CHAMBER ACCESS COVER, SEE DETAIL 5/SP-6SCA HOSE BIBB, SEE DETAIL 7/SP-10HB ACCESSIBLE LIFT, SEE DETAIL 2/SP-8AL COLD WATERCW SLOPE DIRECTION TO DRAINSL. WATER LEVELWL TOP OF DECKTD TOP OF FINISH FLOORTFF INVERT ELEVATIONI.E. POINT OF CONNECTIONP.O.C. STORM DRAINSD TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAILTR CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE LANDSCAPE PERMANENT ASPHALT PAVING PAINTED WARNING STRIPES ON ASPHALT PAVING FIRE LANE, PAINTED RED CURB ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PAINTEDPNT GALVANIZEDGV PERMEABLE CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE DECOMPOSED GRANITE - DG PAVERS TYPE I APPROX. SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE P1 P2 P3 P4 P5- I P5- II PAVERS TYPE II P6 P7 FIRE HYDRANTFH FENCE STATION MARKA# AREA DRAIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETSAD CATCH BASIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETSCB KNOX BOXKB 1. FENCING, GATE AND SIGNAGE PLAN REFER TO A1002.2. PAVING PLAN REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS, A1003, A1004 AND A20013. 6" THICK CONCRETE POOL DECKS W/ #4 REBAR AT 12" O.C. EACHWAY, SHALL HAVE MEDIUM BROOM, NON-SLIP FINISH AND SHALLSLOPE AT 2% MAX. IN ANY DIRECTION4. FIRE ACCESS PLAN REFER TO A10015. ALL WORK SHOWN IS NEW UNLESS NOTED OTHERWISE.6. PATH OF TRAVEL (P.O.T.) AS INDICATED IS A BARRIER FREE ACCESS ROUTE WITHOUT ANY ABRUPT VERTICAL CHANGES EXCEEDING 1/2"BEVELED AT 1:2 MAXIMUM SLOPE, EXCEPT THAT LEVEL CHANGES DO NOT EXCEED 1/4" VERTICAL AND IS AT LEAST 48" WIDE. SURFACE ISSLIP RESISTANT, STABLE AND FIRM. CROSS-SLOPE DOES NOT EXCEED 2% AND SLOPE IN THE DIRECTION OF TRAVEL IS LESS THAN5 % UNLESS OTHERWISE INDICATED. (POT) SHALL BE MAINTAINEDFREE OF OVERHANGING OBSTRUCTIONS TO 80" MINIMUM (1133B.8.2)AND PROTRUDING OBJECTS GREATER THAN 4" PROJECTION FROMWALL AND ABOVE 27" AND LESS THAN 80" (1133B.8.6) ARCHITECTSHALL TO VERIFY THAT THERE ARE NO BARRIERS IN THE PATH OFTRAVEL.7. SIGNAGE @ PAINTED RED CURB: "FIRE LANE - NO PARKING" 4" HEIGHTWHITE LETTERS STENCILED ON CURB 25' O.C. TYP. 8. REFER TO CIVIL DRAWINGS FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATIONINCLUDING GRADING, UTILITIES, PAVING, HORIZONTAL AND VERTICAL CONTROLS AND LIMIT OF WORK.9. NEATLY SAWCUT ASPHALT & CONCRETE PAVING TO BE REMOVED FOR NEW CONSTRUCTION. VERIFY ALL DIMENSIONS, LOCATIONS OFEXISTING STREETS, AND CONDITIONS ON THE JOB PRIOR TO THESTART OF WORK OR PORTIONS OF WORK.10. CONTRACTOR TO BECOME THOROUGHLY FAMILIAR WITH ALLASPECTS OF THE WORK.11. NOTIFY THE ARCHITECT IMMEDIATELY OF ANY DISCREPANCIESBETWEEN ACTUAL FIELD CONDITIONS & CONSTRUCTIONDOCUMENTS.12. SAWCUT, PATCH, & REPLACE EXISTING PAVING AS REQUIRED FOR NEW UTILITY SERVICE & ALL OTHER UNDERGROUND WORK.13. DRIVE PAVEMENTS OVER BASE, REFER TO GEOTECHNICAL REPORT AND CIVIL DRAWINGS.14. REFER TO CIVIL SHEETS FOR LAYOUT OF BUILDINGS WITH RESPECT TO PROPERTY LINES15. REFER TO CIVIL SHEETS FOR OFFSITE WORK.16. PROVIDE MINIMUM 2-A:10-B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AT EACHBUILDING. LOCATION TO BE DETERMINED BY FIRE DEPARTMENTINSPECTOR. CFC 90617. PROVIDE MEANSKNOX ACCESS DEVICES AT GATES AS NOTED. FINALLOCATIONS TO BE APPROVED BY ANAHEIM FIRE DEPARTMENT18. INSTALLATION OR REMOVAL OF ABOVEGROUND/UNDERGROUNDSTORAGE TANKS AND ASSOCIATED EQUIPMENT SHALL BE APPROVED BY ANAHEIM FIRE DEPARTMENT UNDER SEPARATEREVIEW. DATE: ISSUE SHEET TITLE PROJECT Any reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Groupis forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions onthe job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions andconditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Groupfor approval before proceeding with fabrication. SCALE: CHKD' BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: SHEET NUMBER PRIME CONSULTANT SUB CONSULTANT SEAL CLIENT COPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUP COPYRIGHT: ISSUES A 1 B C D E 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E ibigroup.com 1952 West La Palma AvenueAnaheim, California 92801 Landscape:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners 31742 Coast HighwayLaguna Beach, CA 92651Phone:949-645-9444 Electrical Engineer:FBA Consulting Engineers150 Paularino Ave. Ste. A120Costa Mesa, CA 92660 Phone:949-852-9995 Civil Engineer: FUSCOE Engineering2850 Inland Empire Blvd, Ste B Ontario, CA 91764Phone:909-581-0676 Aquatic Engineer: AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP2850 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008Phone:760-438-8400 Structure Engineers:Petra20381 Lake Forest Drive Suite B15 Lake Forest, CA 92630Phone: 949-329-1049 M&P Engineers:Fundament & Associates26 Executive Park, Ste. 100Irvine, CA 92614 GeoTechnical:Koury Geotechnical Services INC.14280 Euclid Ave.Chino, CA 91710Phone: 909-606-611 SUB CONSULTANTS: IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110Irvine CA 92612tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 As indicated AC - ENLARGED SITE PLAN 29957 Author 07/22/14 A1003 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Checker 1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A1003 Scale: 1/16" = 1'-0" 1 OVERALL AQUATIC CENTER SITE N SITE LEGEND SITE NOTES NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE A3002 1 A3001 2 A3001 4 1 2 A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 A4101 4 A4101 A30022 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 184.6 5.6 6.8 139.8 3 A4101 15.2 172.4 B.6 8.4 C.4 D.3 A30011 +/- 10'-1" HB HB TD TD TCO TD TDTSD TCO TD TD TSD SL2%MAX .SL2%MAX . SL2% MAX .SL2% MAX . TDTCO HB TD TSD SL2%MAX .SL2%MAX . TD TD TCOTSD TD SL2%MAX . SL2%MAX . TD TCO TD TSD TD TD SL2%MAX .SL2%MAX . TCO TD TSD SL2% MAX . SL2%MAX . TCO TCO TD TD TD TD TSD TSD SURGECHAMBERBELOW, SEE HB 1,4,7 SP-6 1 SP-1 SEE DRAWINGS BY AQUATIC DESIGN GROUPFOR MORE INFORMATION - SP SHEETS SEE FOR SWIMMING LAYOUT PLAN 2 SP-8 AL TYP. 1,4,7 SP-6TYP. 1-4 SP-12BULKHEAD 8 SP-7 HANDRAILS AT STAIR SURGE ACCESSCOVER, SEE TR 1 SP-4B LEDSCOREBOARDON STEEL POSTS 6 SP-65 SP-6 RACINGPLATFORMS,SEE 9 SP-7 RACINGPLATFORMS,SEE 9 SP-7 MECH ROOM118 GIRLS LOCKER 116 GIRLS SHOWER113 BOYS SHOWER111 STAFFRESTROOM108 OFFICE107 TEAM ROOM104 CONCESSION101 WOMEN'STOILET102 MEN'S TOILET103 TELECOM105 ELECTRICAL106 BOYS LOCKER110 BOYS TOILET112?? CHEMICALSTORAGE 121 CHEMICAL STORAGE 122 STORAGE123 UTILITY124 STORAGE119 CUSTODIAN117 A2002 2 A2003 1 A1009 1 GIRLS TOILET114 CHEMICALSTORAGE120 STORAGEENCLOSURE 216 32 ' - 4 " 14' - 4 " 15 ' - 4 " 2' - 8 " 9' - 4" 12,907 SFSURFACE AREA: 521 FT.PERIMETER: 3'-6" TO 7'-3"DEPTH: 656,433 GALONVOLUME: 1,823 GPM6 HR TURNOVER: CONTROL JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2B/SP-11 EXPANSION JOINT, SEE DETAIL 2A & 2C/SP-11 TOP OF CLEAN-OUT, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11 CJ EJ TOP OF SLOT DRAIN, SEE DETAIL 3/SP-11TSD TCO SURGE CHAMBER ACCESS COVER, SEE DETAIL 5/SP-6SCA HOSE BIBB, SEE DETAIL 7/SP-10HB ACCESSIBLE LIFT, SEE DETAIL 2/SP-8AL COLD WATERCW SLOPE DIRECTION TO DRAINSL. WATER LEVELWL TOP OF DECKTD TOP OF FINISH FLOORTFF INVERT ELEVATIONI.E. POINT OF CONNECTIONP.O.C. STORM DRAINSD TRENCH DRAIN, SEE DETAILTR CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE LANDSCAPE PERMANENT ASPHALT PAVING PAINTED WARNING STRIPES ON ASPHALT PAVING FIRE LANE, PAINTED RED CURB ACCESSIBLE PATH OF TRAVEL PAINTEDPNT GALVANIZEDGV PERMEABLE CONCRETE SLAB ON GRADE DECOMPOSED GRANITE - DG PAVERS TYPE I APPROX. SCOPE OF WORK PROPERTY LINE P1 P2 P3 P4 P5- I P5- II PAVERS TYPE II P6 P7 FIRE HYDRANTFH FENCE STATION MARKA# AREA DRAIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETSAD CATCH BASIN, SEE CIVIL SHEETSCB KNOX BOXKB 1.SEE ALL BUILDING WALL SECTIONS FOR EXTERIOR WALL ASSEMBLY 2.SEE SHEET A6101 FOR DOOR, WINDPW, SIGNAGE AND WALL TYPE LOCATIONS 3. SEE SHEET A6102 FOR ROOM FINISH SCHEDULE 4.SEE SHEET A6201 FOR DOOR SCHEDULE 5.SEE SHEET A6202 FOR WINDOW SCHEDULE 6.SEE SHEET A1103 & POOL DRAWINGS BY ADG FOR SITE SIGANGE DETAILS 7.SEE SEEHT A5113 FOR BUILDING SIGNAGE DETAILS 8.ALL DOORS ARE HM DOORS U.N.O. 9.DOOR TO PROVIDE STC VALUE NOT LESS THAN NIC VALUE OF THE SPACE 10.FURNITURE IS NOT IN CONTRACT 11.FIRE EXTINGUISHER LOCATIONS SEE PLAN SHEETS. PROVIDE MINIMUM 2-A:10-B:C FIRE EXTINGUISHERS AT ALL LOCATIONS TO BE DETERMINED BY FIRE DEPARTMENT INSPECTOR. CFC 906 12.FOR INTERIOR PARTITIONS, PROVIDE ROOM IDENTIFICATION SIGNS ON BOTH SIDES OF THE DOORS 13.REFER TO ELECTRICAL DRAWINGS FOR ENLARGED PLANS OF ELECTRICAL ROOMS 14.PROVIDE MEANS OF EGRESS ILLUMINATION IN ACCORDANCE WITH CFC SECTION 1006 15.INTERIOR FINISHES AND COMBUSTIBLE DECORATIVE MATERIALS SHALL COMPLY WITH CFC 801 16.THE STORAGE, USE AND DISPENSING OF HAZERDOUS MATERIAL, SHALL NOT EXCEED THE MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE QUANTITIES AS SET FORTH IN TABLE 307.1(1) AND (2) OF THE CBC 17.THE STOREAGE, USE OR DISPENSING OF HAZERDOUS MATERIALS, AS DEFINED BY THE FIRE CODE SHALL COMPLY WITH CFC CHAPTER 50 18.PROVIDE PANIC HARDWARE ON THE EGRESS GATES FROM THE POOL AREA 1.REFER TO FINISH SCHEDULE FOR FINISHES 2.FRP NOT SHOWN ON ALL WALL TYPES, REFER TO FINISH SCHEDULE.3.FINISHES ARE FULL HEIGHT TO UNDER SIDE OF ROOF UNLESS NOTED: A.GYPSUM BOARDB.STUDSC.TILE BACKER BOARD D.PLYWOOD SHEATHINGE.RC - CHANNEL 4.CERAMIC TILE TO UNDER SIDE CEILING UNLESS NOTED FULL-HEIGHT ASSEMBLY COMPONENTS 5.FOR EXTERIOR WALL TYPES REFER TO SHEETS - A4201 - S201 - A4201 WALL TYPE NOTES: - S202 FEC FIRE EXTINGUISHER CABINET N.I.C.NOT IN CONTRACT DATE: ISSUE SHEET TITLE PROJECT Any reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Groupis forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions onthe job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions andconditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Groupfor approval before proceeding with fabrication. SCALE: CHKD' BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: SHEET NUMBER PRIME CONSULTANT SUB CONSULTANT SEAL CLIENT COPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUP COPYRIGHT: ISSUES A 1 B C D E 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E ibigroup.com 1952 West La Palma AvenueAnaheim, California 92801 Landscape:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners 31742 Coast HighwayLaguna Beach, CA 92651Phone:949-645-9444 Electrical Engineer:FBA Consulting Engineers150 Paularino Ave. Ste. A120Costa Mesa, CA 92660 Phone:949-852-9995 Civil Engineer: FUSCOE Engineering2850 Inland Empire Blvd, Ste B Ontario, CA 91764Phone:909-581-0676 Aquatic Engineer: AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP2850 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008Phone:760-438-8400 Structure Engineers:Petra20381 Lake Forest Drive Suite B15 Lake Forest, CA 92630Phone: 949-329-1049 M&P Engineers:Fundament & Associates26 Executive Park, Ste. 100Irvine, CA 92614 GeoTechnical:Koury Geotechnical Services INC.14280 Euclid Ave.Chino, CA 91710Phone: 909-606-611 SUB CONSULTANTS: IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110Irvine CA 92612tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 3/32" = 1'-0" AC- OVERALL PLAN 29957 Author 07/22/14 A2001 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Checker 1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A2001 Scale: 3/32" = 1'-0" 1 AQUATIC CENTER SITE SLAB PLAN POOL DATA N SITE LEGEND FLOOR PLAN NOTES NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0" AQUATIC ROOF 12' - 0" A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q 1 A4101 AQUATIC CANOPY 14' - 0" B.6 C.4 GLASS OVER LOW WALL FENCE TYPE, SEE SHEET A1002 AQUATIC F.F. 0' - 0" AQUATIC C. ROOF 10' - 0" BASEBALL F.F 0' - 0" T.O. BLEACHER 7' - 0" CANOPY 12' - 0"AQUATIC C. SITEWALL 8' - 0" CMU, TYP. 2 A1007 A1103 1 A3002 4 12 ' - 0 " AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0" AQUATIC ROOF 12' - 0" ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ 1 A4101 AQUATIC CANOPY 14' - 0" CMU WALL, TYP.BLEACHER CANOPY GREEN SCREEN ABOVE CMU WALL GREEN SCREEN 4 A4101 B.6C.4D.3 CMU, TYP. A3002 3CMUPATTERNDOWNSPOUT WITHSPLASH BLOCK, TYP.DOWNSPOUT WITHSPLASH BLOCK, TYP.DOWNSPOUT WITHSPLASH BLOCK, TYP. A3001 3 AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0" AQUATIC ROOF 12' - 0" 1 2 2 A4101 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 14 15 16 1813 3 A4101 17 BASEBALL F.F0' - 0" T.O. BLEACHER7' - 0" CANOPY12' - 0"AQUATIC C. SITEWALL 8' - 0" CMU, TYP. DOWNSPOUT WITHSPLASH BLOCK, TYP. -ANGLE DOWNSPOUT TO EAST SIDE OF THISCORNER DOWNSPOUT - TIGHT TO BEAM, THRUSLAB ON GRADE TO CURB OUTLET SITE GATE AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0" 12 AQUATIC CANOPY 14' - 0" 2.4 CMU, TYP. SCOREBOARD CANOPY OVER BLEACHER MNO T.O. CMU T.O. GREENSCREEN A3002 3 Sim FOR COLOR PATTERN, SEE DETAIL A1103 11 A1103 12 DATE: ISSUE SHEET TITLE PROJECT Any reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Groupis forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions onthe job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions andconditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Groupfor approval before proceeding with fabrication. SCALE: CHKD' BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: SHEET NUMBER PRIME CONSULTANT SUB CONSULTANT SEAL CLIENT COPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUP COPYRIGHT: ISSUES A 1 B C D E 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E ibigroup.com 1952 West La Palma AvenueAnaheim, California 92801 Landscape:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners 31742 Coast HighwayLaguna Beach, CA 92651Phone:949-645-9444 Electrical Engineer:FBA Consulting Engineers150 Paularino Ave. Ste. A120Costa Mesa, CA 92660 Phone:949-852-9995 Civil Engineer: FUSCOE Engineering2850 Inland Empire Blvd, Ste B Ontario, CA 91764Phone:909-581-0676 Aquatic Engineer: AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP2850 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008Phone:760-438-8400 Structure Engineers:Petra20381 Lake Forest Drive Suite B15 Lake Forest, CA 92630Phone: 949-329-1049 M&P Engineers:Fundament & Associates26 Executive Park, Ste. 100Irvine, CA 92614 GeoTechnical:Koury Geotechnical Services INC.14280 Euclid Ave.Chino, CA 91710Phone: 909-606-611 SUB CONSULTANTS: IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110Irvine CA 92612tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 As indicated AC - BUILDING ELEVATIONS 29957 Author 07/22/14 A3001 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Checker 1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A3001 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 AC - EAST ELEVATION A3001 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 AC - WEST ELEVATION A3001 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 4 AC - SOUTH ELEVATION A3001 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 5 AC - NORTH ELEVATION A3001 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 3 ENLARGED AQUATIC WEST ELEVATION A3001 Scale: 6 GREEN SCREEN 3D VIEW - FOR REFERENCE NLY NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0" 12 2 A4101 34567891011121415164.65.66.8139.8 3 A4101 17 2.4 CMU ROOF OVERFLOW DRAIN OUTLET AT 18" A.F.S. AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0" PUMP PIT -5' - 0" A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z 1 A4101 POOL -8' - 9" AQUATIC CANOPY 14' - 0" 4 A4101 B.6 C.4 D.3 TOF-1' - 4" AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0" DED.3 4" CMU - SHOT BLAST,EBONY, TYP. SHOT BLAST -CINDER WHITE, TYP. NOTES: 1. CMU BLOCKS ARE SHOP SAND BLASTED2. SEAL ALL CMU 4" CMU - CAP, TYP. AQUATIC F.F 0' - 0"AQUATIC F.F. 0' - 0" AQUATIC C. ROOF 10' - 0" BASEBALL F.F 0' - 0" T.O. BLEACHER 7' - 0" 42" TALL "CALIBRI"FONT ETCHED INTOGLASS, TYP. DONOR NAMES, 6COLUMNS, 24PTCALIBRI FONT, TYP. T.O. LETTERS 7' - 0 " 8' - 0 " DATE: ISSUE SHEET TITLE PROJECT Any reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Groupis forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions onthe job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions andconditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Groupfor approval before proceeding with fabrication. SCALE: CHKD' BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: SHEET NUMBER PRIME CONSULTANT SUB CONSULTANT SEAL CLIENT COPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUP COPYRIGHT: ISSUES A 1 B C D E 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E ibigroup.com 1952 West La Palma AvenueAnaheim, California 92801 Landscape:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners 31742 Coast HighwayLaguna Beach, CA 92651Phone:949-645-9444 Electrical Engineer:FBA Consulting Engineers150 Paularino Ave. Ste. A120Costa Mesa, CA 92660 Phone:949-852-9995 Civil Engineer: FUSCOE Engineering2850 Inland Empire Blvd, Ste B Ontario, CA 91764Phone:909-581-0676 Aquatic Engineer: AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP2850 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008Phone:760-438-8400 Structure Engineers:Petra20381 Lake Forest Drive Suite B15 Lake Forest, CA 92630Phone: 949-329-1049 M&P Engineers:Fundament & Associates26 Executive Park, Ste. 100Irvine, CA 92614 GeoTechnical:Koury Geotechnical Services INC.14280 Euclid Ave.Chino, CA 91710Phone: 909-606-611 SUB CONSULTANTS: IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110Irvine CA 92612tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 As indicated AC - BUILDING ELEVATIONS 29957 Author 07/22/14 A3002 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Checker 1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A3002 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 1 BC - NORTH ELEVATION A3002 Scale: 1/8" = 1'-0" 2 BLEACHER EAST ELEVATION A3002 Scale: 1/2" = 1'-0" 3 CMU PATTERN VIEW A3002 Scale: 1/4" = 1'-0" 4 AQUATIC WINDSCREEN ELEVATION NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE DATE: ISSUE SHEET TITLE PROJECT Any reproduction or distribution for any prupose other than authorized by IBI Groupis forbidden. Written dimensions shall have precedence over scaled dimensions.Contractors shall verify and be responsible for all dimensions and conditions onthe job and IBI Group shall be informed of any variations from the dimensions andconditions shown on the drawing. Shop drawings shall be submitted to IBI Groupfor approval before proceeding with fabrication. SCALE: CHKD' BY: DRAWN BY: PROJECT NO: SHEET NUMBER PRIME CONSULTANT SUB CONSULTANT SEAL CLIENT COPYRIGHT © 2009 IBI GROUP COPYRIGHT: ISSUES A 1 B C D E 2 3 4 5 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 A B C D E ibigroup.com 1952 West La Palma AvenueAnaheim, California 92801 Landscape:Fong Hart Schneider+Partners 31742 Coast HighwayLaguna Beach, CA 92651Phone:949-645-9444 Electrical Engineer:FBA Consulting Engineers150 Paularino Ave. Ste. A120Costa Mesa, CA 92660 Phone:949-852-9995 Civil Engineer: FUSCOE Engineering2850 Inland Empire Blvd, Ste B Ontario, CA 91764Phone:909-581-0676 Aquatic Engineer: AQUATIC DESIGN GROUP2850 Faraday Avenue Carlsbad, CA 92008Phone:760-438-8400 Structure Engineers:Petra20381 Lake Forest Drive Suite B15 Lake Forest, CA 92630Phone: 949-329-1049 M&P Engineers:Fundament & Associates26 Executive Park, Ste. 100Irvine, CA 92614 GeoTechnical:Koury Geotechnical Services INC.14280 Euclid Ave.Chino, CA 91710Phone: 909-606-611 SUB CONSULTANTS: IBI GROUP 18401 Von Karman Ave. - Suite 110Irvine CA 92612tel 949 833 5588 fax 949 833 5511 BUILDING ELEVATION & PERSPECTIVES 29957 Author 07/22/14 A3003 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL Checker 1952 West La Palma Ave., Anaheim, CA 92801 SERVITE HIGH SCHOOL A3003 Scale: 1 Perspective View of Pool A3003 Scale: 2 AQUATIC CENTER - 3D VIEW WEST ELEVATION A3003 Scale: 3 AQUATIC CENTER- POOL DECK 3D VIEW - FOR REFERENCE ONLY A3003 Scale: 4 AQUATIC CENTER EAST ELEVATIION 3D VIEW- FOR REFERENCE ONLY NO. ISSUANCE STATUS DATE 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 7 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: MAY 16, 2015 SUBJECT: ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO FINAL SUBSEQUENT EIR NO. 339 AND MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN NO. 330 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2015-00506 MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2015-00621 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.2015-00002 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2015-174 (COLLECTIVELY, THE "PROJECT ACTIONS") LOCATION: The Property is located at 1800 East Gene Autry Way and consists of approximately 17.57-acres located at the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way (Jefferson Stadium Park). APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Heidi Mather representing Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting to develop a mixed-use project consisting of 1,079 residential units inclusive of 12 live/work units, 9,800 square feet of retail space, a public park, and a network of local streets. The proposed project is known as Jefferson Stadium Park. The applicant’s requests require Planning Commission review and City Council approval of the following applications: 1) Addendum No. 5 to Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (FSEIR No. 339) and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 (MMRP No. 330), together with other previously-approved environmental documents, to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Jefferson Stadium Park Project. 2) A General Plan Amendment to amend the Land Use, Green and Circulation Elements of the General Plan to reflect the relocation of the proposed public park and proposed street alignment. 3) An amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) to reconfigure internal streets, reflect the relocation of the proposed park, and designate areas currently assigned for park use for mixed-use development. 4) A development agreement between the City of Anaheim and Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. to develop the Jefferson Stadium Park Project. JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 2 of 12 5) A tentative parcel map to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and a public park to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. This request was originally advertised (noticed) as including a master site plan (Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00622) and three final site plans (Final Site Plan Nos. 2015-00003, 2015-00004 and 2015-00005). Following advertisement, staff determined that a master site plan was not necessary for this project, given that final site plans and a tentative tract map had been submitted for the proposed development. The final site plans and tentative tract map provide a greater level of detail than typically provided for a master site plan. The Planning Director has approval authority over final site plans. Once the final site plans are approved, they are attached as exhibits to the development agreement, which is then submitted for Planning Commission review and recommendation for City Council approval. The Planning Director has reviewed the final site plans, found them in conformance with the provisions of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone and the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP); and, subsequently approved said plans. The plans are provided as Exhibit B-1 through B-3 to the development agreement. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolutions recommending that the City Council approve Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339 and MMRP No. 330, together with other previously-approved environmental documents, to serve as the environmental documentation for the Jefferson Stadium Park Project; and, approve the requested General Plan Amendment, PTMLUP Amendment, development agreement, and tentative parcel map. BACKGROUND: The subject 17.5-acre Jefferson Stadium Park site is located within the Platinum Triangle in the Industrial (I) Zone and the PTMU Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates this property for Mixed Use and Park land uses. The property is surrounded by multi- family and commercial uses to the south across Artisan Court; industrial and office uses to the west; The Southern California Gas Company offices and vacant property to the north across Gene Autry Way; and, Angel Stadium of Anaheim to the east across State College Boulevard. The subject property is currently vacant with exception of former parking lots and building foundations of buildings demolished from the previous development. In May 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update which established a new vision for the Platinum Triangle as a dynamic mixed-use urban district. This update created new land use designations within the Platinum Triangle that provide opportunities for existing, largely industrial, uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. This General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which at that time permitted up to 9,175 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, and 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses. JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 3 of 12 On August 2004, the City Council approved the PTMLUP to carry out the goals and policies of the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle. The PTMLUP serves as a blueprint for future development and street improvements. The City Council also adopted the PTMU Overlay Zone and a standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement form to implement the PTMLUP’s vision for the Platinum Triangle. In August 2007, the City Council approved a development agreement for a mixed-use master planned community on the subject property (The Experience at Gene Autry Way Project). The proposed development consisted of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses, and a 1.7-acre public park. On September 25, 2012 the City Council approved an amendment to the development agreement to extend the initial term to November 16, 2017. On October 26, 2010, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (FSEIR No. 339) in conjunction with its approval of amendments to the General Plan, PTMLUP, PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone to up to 18,909 residential units; 14,340,522 square feet of office uses; 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses; and, 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. FSEIR No. 339 specifically analyzed the development of up to 1,208 dwelling units; 219,000 square feet of office development; and, 118,000 square feet of commercial development on the project site. The increase in office and commercial development over the approved Experience at Gene Autry Project was in anticipation of proposed changes to the project; however, the development agreement was never amended to reflect this increase in office and commercial square footage. Four addenda to FSEIR No. 339 have been approved following certification of the EIR in 2010. These addenda were approved in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 undercrossing improvements, and revisions to the Platinum Gateway, Platinum Vista, and A-Town projects. These projects included changes to the maximum permitted development intensity within the Platinum Triangle, which now permits up to 19,027 residential units; 14,131,103 square feet of office uses; 4,735,111 square feet of commercial uses; and, 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting to develop a mixed-use project consisting of 1,079 residential units inclusive of 12 live/work units, 9,800 square feet of retail space, a public park, and a network of local streets. The proposed Jefferson Stadium Park project is expected to be developed in three phases. The project has been designed as a cohesive community that will complement existing and planned development on adjacent parcels. Each building will feature distinct architectural elements and colors, but the consistent use of materials and complementary styles will tie all of the buildings together. All requirements for parking and open space will be satisfied within each phase. JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 4 of 12 Overall Site Plan Phase I: Phase I will consist of a 370-unit, five-story wrap-style apartment building near the western boundary of the site. Building elevations will feature varying window sizes and patterns, plaster and concrete finishes. Balconies will include fabricated metal railings with perforated inserts. The amenity deck on the roof will allow residents to enjoy views in the area. Parking for this building will be provided in an attached parking structure abutting the west property line. Phase I Rendering JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 5 of 12 Public Park A 1.1 acre public park will also be completed in the first phase. The park would be the first public park constructed south of Katella Avenue, providing an important amenity to existing residents as well as those living at Jefferson Stadium Park. The park meets the City’s park space dedication requirements by providing a minimum of 44 square feet of public park space for each residential unit. The park is proposed to be located in the middle of the three apartment buildings and adjacent to Artisan Court and include on-street public parking available for park visitors. Amenities in this park would include a dog park, open grass field, shade structures and tables, bocce ball courts, a half basketball court, and outdoor exercise equipment. Public Park Plan JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 6 of 12 Phase II: Phase II will include a mixed-use, five-story wrap community near the center of the site with 376 units, including 12 live/work units. Each live/work unit will consist of commercial and residential space. The commercial portion will be located on the ground floor fronting Gene Autry Way and accessed from a storefront adjacent to the street. The residential portion on the second floor will be accessed through an entry door in the building breezeway or an interior stairwell located in the rear of the commercial space. A condition of approval has been included in the development agreement requiring that the commercial space must be used by the resident of the unit and may not be sublet. Because these are rental units this condition will eliminate any conflicts between two tenants sharing a connected space. This phase will also feature an amenity deck on the roof. The architectural style of Phase II would be that of an urban city center, employing patterns of glazing and layering of panel elements with horizontal and vertical color and material blocking to provide a varying contemporary scheme. The elevations will feature plaster and concrete finishes. Balconies will include fabricated metal railings with perforated inserts. Phase II Rendering JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 7 of 12 Phase III: Phase III will consist of a mixed-use, six-story podium building with 333 units and 9,800 square feet of retail space. This building is the closest building to Angel Stadium of Anaheim and is influenced by a sports theme, with movement and rhythm on the exterior building expressed with vertical stairway elements and details. The elevations will feature plaster, glass, metal and concrete finishes. Most balconies will include fabricated metal railings with perforated inserts and some will feature tinted glass railings. A strong corner element will be developed at Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard, providing an attractive entry and retail plaza into the entire development. Phase III Rendering Connector Streets Two connector streets, one public (Union Street) and one private, will be constructed to provide internal access and circulation. Upon build-out of the Platinum Triangle, these streets will connect to Artisan Court, which was constructed for the Anavia project to the south. However, the future extension of Artisan Court to Union Street is not a part of the Jefferson Stadium Park project because the property owner does not control all of the property necessary for this extension. Although there will not be a vehicular connection at this time, a pedestrian connection will be provided via a sidewalk on the south side of the public park. JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 8 of 12 Development Summary Table Phase Area (acres) Commercial Floor Area (square feet) Number of Residential Units Residential Density (dwelling units per acre) Proposed Height (feet) I 4.93 0 370 75.5 86’10” II 5.12 12 Live/Work units 376 73.4 85 III 4.35 9,800 333 76.6 77’7” Subtotal 14.4 9,800 1,079 75 Connector Streets 2.2 Public Park 1.1 Total Project 17.7 9,800 1,079 75 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339 and MMRP No. 330 An Addendum to FSEIR No. 339 has been prepared to determine whether the environmental impacts of the Jefferson Stadium Park project were fully disclosed by FSEIR No. 339 or if a subsequent or supplemental EIR is necessary for this project. The analysis in FSEIR No. 339 included anticipated build-out of the Experience at Gene Autry project which was approved in 2007. The proposed project represents a significant reduction in the development intensity from the approved project. As more thoroughly described in the Addendum, the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park project is considered to be a refinement of the development assumptions analyzed by FSEIR No. 339 and will not require any major revisions to the Final EIR. The proposed project will not result in significant new or more severe impacts and/or the requirement for additional mitigation measures. As a result, the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park project does not require the preparation of a subsequent EIR or supplemental EIR. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 has been created to mitigate the impacts of the proposed project and includes all applicable mitigation measures from FSEIR No. 339. General Plan Amendment The applicant is requesting to amend the General Plan to relocate one park and eliminate another park, both of which were designated as part of the previous Experience at Gene Autry project. The relocation and elimination of these parks requires modification to all figures in the General Plan that include parks. Park figures are included within the Land Use, Circulation and Green Elements of the General Plan. This amendment will reflect the change in size and location as well as the proposed street layout on the maps identifying the parks in various General Plan maps. JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 9 of 12 Before the Planning Commission may approve a General Plan Amendment, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Plan; 2) The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience or welfare of the City; 3) The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and 4) If the amendment is to the General Plan Land Use Map, the subject property is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modification, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses. The proposed changes to the General Plan do not create inconsistencies with applicable goals and policies. Applicable goals and policies relate to creating dynamic, identifiable places for the benefit of Anaheim residents, employees and visitors, and encouraging mixed-use and commercial development that provide safe, protected places for pedestrians to walk, attractive surroundings, opportunities for social interaction, and comfortable places to sit and relax. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested General Plan Amendment. Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan The applicant is requesting an amendment to the PTMLUP to reconfigure internal streets, reflect the relocation of the proposed park, and designate areas currently assigned for park use for mixed-use development. The Anaheim Municipal Code does not require specific findings for approval of an amendment to a Master Land Use Plan; however, because a Master Land Use Plan is somewhat similar to a Specific Plan, staff believes the following findings typically associated the approval of a Specific Plan Amendment should be considered. For the purpose of clarity, the term “Specific Plan” has been replaced with “Master Land Use Plan”: 1) That the Master Land Use Plan is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, and with the purposes, standards and land use guidelines therein; 2) That the Master Land Use Plan results in development of desirable character that will be compatible with existing and proposed development in the surrounding neighborhood; 3) That Master Land Use Plan contributes to a balance of land uses throughout the City; and 4) That the Master Land Use Plan respects environmental, aesthetic and historic resources consistent with economic realities. The amendment to the Master Land Use Plan was designed to be consistent with the General Plan by continuing to promote mixed-use development that balances commercial, residential, and recreation uses in a neighborhood that is compatible to the surrounding developments through local streets and pedestrian friendly linkages. The proposed amendments would result in a community of desirable character that would be compatible with existing and proposed JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 10 of 12 development in the surrounding neighborhood. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested amendments to the PTMLUP. Development Agreement: The applicant has proposed a new development agreement to correspond with the proposed changes to the development. A development agreement is a contract for development which provides a property owner or developer a vested right to proceed with an approved development, “freezing” the entitlement along with established regulations and fees, in exchange for the City obtaining benefits beyond what would otherwise be required by existing regulations and ordinances. State law allows cities and project applicants to enter into a development agreement for their mutual benefit. A development agreement between a property owner and the City is required for development in the Platinum Triangle. The proposed development agreement would provide the applicant with the certainty desired to develop the Jefferson Stadium Park project and in return would provide amenities in the Platinum Triangle. The development agreement outlines timeframes for this development and establishes milestones for the completion of components of the project. In 1982 the City Council approved a resolution establishing procedures and requirements for the consideration of development agreements. This resolution identifies four items necessary for the Planning Commission to make a recommendation to the City Council. These items are: 1. The proposed development agreement is consistent with the General Plan; and 2. The proposed development agreement is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the Revised Project is and will be located; and 3. The proposed development agreement is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area; and 4. The proposed development agreement is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Through thorough research and review for the this project, staff believes that the proposed project and development agreement meet the requirements listed above and therefore, recommends approval of the development agreement as it serves to provide surety for the developer and includes benefits to the City including community amenities such as space for the City to develop and operate a community center. Tentative Parcel Map A parcel map is proposed to reconfigure the development areas and redesign the street system to accommodate the proposed development. The purpose of the Commission’s consideration of a tentative map is to review the proposed subdivision for consistency with the General Plan and Zoning Code. The proposed subdivision would comply with all of the development standards of JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 11 of 12 the PTMU Overlay zone. The subdivision would also be in conformance with the Land Use Element of the General Plan, which includes the following goals: • Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. • Goal 3.1: Pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City’s image and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations. • Goal 3.2: Maximize development opportunities along transportation routes. • Goal 5.1 Create and enhance dynamic, identifiable places for the benefit of Anaheim residents, employees and visitors. • Goal 6.1: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development. In addition to ensuring that the tentative parcel map is consistent with the City’s General Plan, the following findings from the Subdivision Map Act must also be made: 1. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, including its design and improvements, is consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed Project as represented on the Master Site Plan; 3. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified; 4. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 5. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, or the type of improvements would not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The design of the tentative parcel map is consistent with the General Plan as identified in the previously referenced General Plan goals and suitable for the type and density of the project. As analyzed in the Draft Addendum to FSEIR No. 339, the proposed map would not cause substantial environmental damage or serious public health problems or conflict with any easements for or on the property. For these reasons staff believes that the proposed tentative parcel map meets findings required by the Subdivision Map Act and recommends its approval. JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT May 16, 2016 Page 12 of 12 CONCLUSION: The proposed Jefferson Stadium Park Project is a thoughtfully designed and planned project that maintains the vision of the Platinum Triangle. The project also conforms to the PTMLUP as revised and amended and the PTMU Overlay Zone. Staff believes that the proposed General Plan Amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and that the proposed development would be an appropriate addition to the Platinum Triangle. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, G. Scott Koehm Jonathan E. Borrego Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Summary of Project Actions 2. Draft CEQA Resolution 3. Draft General Plan Amendment Resolution a. General Plan Exhibits 4. Draft PTMLUP Amendment Resolution a. Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (Amended exhibits) 5. Draft Development Agreement Resolution a. Development Agreement b. Conditions of Approval c. Final Site Plan Exhibits 6. Draft Tentative Parcel Map Resolution a. Tentative Parcel Map 7. Letter of Request/Justification 8. FSEIR No. 339 and Addenda a. Errata Sheet 9. Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 O-L (PTMU)OfficeVACANT I (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area CSOUTHERN CALIFORNIAGAS COMPANYOFFICES I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area AVACANT I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area CINDUSTRIAL PR (PTMU)StadiumOFFICES P R (P T M U ) S t a d i u m A N G E L S T A D I U M O F A N A H E I M I (P T M U ) G a t e w a y S u b -A r e a C I N D U S T R I A L I (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area CVACANT I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area AVACANT I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area AVACANT I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Gene Autry Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AANAVIA APARTMENTS I (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AOFFICES O-L (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AOFFICES I (PTMU)Gateway Sub-Area AOFFICES I (PTMU)OfficeOFFICES O-L (PTMU)OfficeVACANT S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E GENE AUTRY WAY E ARTISAN CT S M A R K E T S TE TRIAD ST S U N I O N S T GENE AUTRY WAY E TRIAD ST E. KATELLA AVE E. CERRITOS AVE S . H A S T E R S T S. M A NCHESTERAVE E. CHAPMAN AVE S . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D S .D O U G L A S S R D 1800 East Gene Autry Way DEV No. 2015-00078 Subject Property APN: 083-290-88 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E GENE AUTRY WAY E ARTISAN CT S M A R K E T S TE TRIAD ST S SANTA CRUZ ST S U N I O N S T GENE AUTRY WAY U N I O N S T E TRIAD ST E. KATELLA AVE E. CERRITOS AVE S . H A S T E R S T S. M A NCHESTERAVE E. CHAPMAN AVE S . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D S .D O U G L A S S R D 1800 East Gene Autry Way DEV No. 2015-00078 Subject Property APN: 083-290-88 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 Jefferson Stadium Park Summary of Project Actions • Addendum No. 5 to EIR No. 339 • General Plan Amendments o Land Use Element (Figure LU-4) (change park locations on map) o Circulation Element (Figure C-5 Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities) (change park locations on map and streets layout) o Green Element (Figure G-1 Green Plan) (change park locations on map) • Amendment to Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan o Changes to Figure 3 (street locations, new park location) o Figure 4 (street locations, new park location) o Figure 5 (street locations) o Figure 20 (street locations, park location) o Figure 21 (update cross section map) • Development Agreement • Tentative Parcel Map ATTACHMENT NO. 1 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE ADDENDUM NO. 5 TO THE PREVIOUSLY-CERTIFIED REVISED PLATINUM TRIANGLE EXPANSION PROJECT SUBSEQUENT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 339 FOR THE REVISED PLATINUM TRIANGLE EXPANSION PROJECT, ALONG WITH MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PLAN NO. 330, AND DETERMINING THAT SAID ADDENDUM, TOGETHER WITH OTHER PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION, SERVES AS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION FOR PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE GENERAL PLAN, THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MASTER LAND USE PLAN, AND FOR A NEW TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP AND A DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH JEFFERSON AT STADIUM PARK, L.P. FOR THE JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK PROJECT AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF SAID ENTITLEMENTS. (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2015-00506, MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2015-00621, DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2015-00002, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2015-174) (DEV2015-00078) WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, - 2- PC2016-*** 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development and 15,570 on- site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the renovated Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were developed/renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners - 3- PC2016-*** desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007 and in response to the application of AMB Property, L.P. (“Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of a mixed-use master planned community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses, up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 1.7-acre public park, and related improvements (the "Original Project") on certain real property consisting of approximately 17.5 acres and bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the north, and Artisan Court on the south (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 335, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 143, were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original Project; and WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00446, to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2006-00162 to amend the PTMLUP to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in the Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (3) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2007-00054 to amend the PTMU Overlay Zone to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (4) Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05134 to permit building heights over 100 feet (up to 300 feet proposed) for the proposed Gene Autry Experience project; (5) Development Agreement No. 2006-00004; and (6) Tentative Tract Map No. 17089 to establish a 21-lot, mixed use subdivision with 1,208 residential units; 100,000 square feet of office uses; and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses (collectively, the “Original Development Approvals”); and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007, the City Council approved the Original Development Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the Original Development Agreement on or about September 11, 2007, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange on November 16, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000687363 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and - 4- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the Original Owner's request for an amendment to the Original Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial period of ten (10) years was approved by the City Council on September 25, 2012. Accordingly, on or about October 2, 2012, the City and Original Owner entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on October 25, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012000652444 (“Amendment No. 1”); and WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Existing Entitlements”; and WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and - 5- PC2016-*** 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No. 1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report had occurred; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107") to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the "Mixed-Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum Gateway Project"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No. 3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005-1105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No. 6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and - 6- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No. 4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1-acre (approximate) property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the "A-Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A-Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20 of the Existing Development Agreement and Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim, the Owner has requested a series of actions to replace the Original Development Approvals and permit a development consisting of approximately 1,079 residential dwelling units inclusive of 12 live/work units, approximately, but not to exceed, 9,800 square feet of commercial uses, a public park, and a network of local streets (the "Project"). To that end, the Owner has requested the following entitlements to replace the Existing Entitlements: 1. An amendment to the General Plan to reflect the relocation and combination of the two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use ("General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506"); 2. An amendment to the PTMLUP to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 201-00506 to, among other things, reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2015- 00621"); 3. Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested development rights in connection therewith; 4. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed apartment buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and public recreation/park areas to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015- 00621, Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed New Entitlements"; and - 7- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, in connection with the Proposed New Entitlements, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, has been prepared in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the previously-approved FSEIR No. 339 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe. FSEIR No. 339, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No. 2, Addendum No. 3, Addendum No. 4, and Addendum No. 5, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 proposed for the Project collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), and the State CEQA Guidelines relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Addendum No. 5 and for and against the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, at said public hearing, upon hearing and considering all testimony and arguments (if any) of all persons desiring to be heard, the Planning Commission considered all factors relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project, including Addendum No. 5, together with the other CEQA Documents; and WHEREAS, to the extent authorized by law, the Planning Commission desires and intends to use Addendum No. 5, together with the other CEQA Documents, as the environmental documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of proposed Addendum No. 5, the CEQA Documents and the evidence received to date, does find and determine and recommends that the City Council also find and determine as follows: - 8- PC2016-*** 1. That Addendum No. 5 was prepared for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual. 2. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in Addendum No. 5, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR or negative declaration have occurred; specifically: (a) There have not been any substantial changes in the Original Project that require major revisions of the CEQA Documents because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (b) There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Project is undertaken that require major revisions of the CEQA Documents due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (c) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time FSEIR No. 339 was certified as complete or the other CEQA Documents were adopted, that shows any of the following: (a) the Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in FSEIR No. 339 or the other CEQA Documents; (b) significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in FSEIR No. 339 or the other CEQA Documents; (c) mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Project, but the Owner declines to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or (d) mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in FSEIR No. 339 or the other CEQA Documents would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the Owner decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. 3. In connection with the Proposed New Entitlements and the Planning Commission’s review of Addendum No. 5, the Planning Commission has independently reviewed all of the CEQA Documents and has exercised its independent judgment in making the findings and determinations set forth herein. 4. Pursuant to the above findings, the Planning Commission determines that the previously-approved CEQA Documents, together with Addendum No. 5, satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and hereby recommends that the City Council approve and adopt Addendum No. 5 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 330 for the Project. - 9- PC2016-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. _ SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3 -1- PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2015-00506) (DEV2015-00078) WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (“City Council”) did adopt the Anaheim General Plan by Resolution No. 69R-644, showing the general description and extent of possible future development within the City; and WHEREAS, following the adoption of the Anaheim General Plan, several amendments and updates to the General Plan and certain elements thereof have been approved and adopted by the City Council over the years; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 18.68 of the Anaheim Municipal Code ("Code"), provisions of the General Plan may be amended whenever the public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require such amendment when adopted by a resolution of the City Council in the manner prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center ("ARTIC"), and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were either developed or renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and -2- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the aforementioned development intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in -3- PC2016-*** conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007 and in response to the application of AMB Property, LP (“Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of a mixed-use master planned community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses, up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 1.7-acre public park, and related improvements (the "Original Project") on certain real property consisting of approximately 17.5 acres and bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the north, and Artisan Court on the south (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 335, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 143, were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original Project; and WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00446, to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2006-00162 to amend the PTMLUP to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (3) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2007-00054 to amend The PTMU Overlay Zone to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (4) Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05134 to permit building heights over 100 feet (up to 300 feet proposed) for the proposed Gene Autry Experience project; (5) Development Agreement No. 2006-00004; and (6) Tentative Tract Map No. 17089 to establish a 21-lot, mixed use subdivision with 1,208 residential units; 100,000 square feet of office uses; and, 50,000 square feet of commercial uses (collectively, the “Original Development Approvals”); and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007, the City Council approved the Original Development Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the Original Development Agreement on or about September 11, 2007, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange on November 16, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000687363 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and -4- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the Original Owner's request for an amendment to the Original Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial period of ten (10) years was approved by the City Council on September 25, 2012. Accordingly, on or about October 2, 2012, the City and Original Owner entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on October 25, 2012 as Instrument No. 652444 (“Amendment No. 1”); and WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Existing Entitlements”; and WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and -5- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No. 1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report had occurred; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2013-00490"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107") to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the "Mixed-Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum Gateway Project"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No. 3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005-11105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No. 6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No. 4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1-acre (approximate) property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the "A-Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on -6- PC2016-*** Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A-Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 20 of the Existing Development Agreement and Chapter 18.60 of the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim, the Owner has requested a series of actions to replace the Original Development Approvals and permit a development consisting of approximately 1,079 residential dwelling units inclusive of 12 live/work units, approximately, but not to exceed, 9,800 square feet of commercial uses, a public park, and a network of local streets (the "Project"). To that end, the Owner has requested the following entitlements to replace the Existing Entitlements: 1. An amendment to the General Plan to reflect the relocation and combination of the two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use ("General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506"); 2. An amendment to the PTMLUP to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 201-00506 to, among other things, reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621"); 3. Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested development rights in connection therewith; 4. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed apartment buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and public recreation/park areas to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015- 00621, Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed New Entitlements"; and WHEREAS, in connection with the Proposed New Entitlements, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, has been prepared in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the previously-approved FSEIR No. 339 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe. FSEIR No. 339, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No. 2, Addendum No. 3, Addendum No. 4, and Addendum No. 5, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project collectively constitute the -7- PC2016-*** environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), and the State CEQA Guidelines relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Addendum No. 5 and for and against the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission has found and determined and has recommended that the City Council so find and determine the following: 1. That Addendum No. 5 together with the other CEQA Documents collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project; and 2. That, pursuant to the findings contained in said concurrent resolution, the CEQA Documents satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and, together with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 330 for the Project, should be approved and adopted; and 3. That no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project. WHEREAS, the Property consists of 1 parcel currently designated for use as “Mixed Use and Open Space" on the land use map of the General Plan. This parcel is zoned "I" Industrial and is located within the Gene Autry District of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and, as such, is subject to and must comply with the land use intensities and the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506 proposes to amend the Anaheim General Plan as follows: 1. Land Use Element • Amend “Figure LU-4: Land Use Plan” of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to reflect the consolidation of the two public parks and the relocation of the proposed public park as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. -8- PC2016-*** 2. Circulation Element • Amend “Figure C-5: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities” of the Circulation Element of the General Plan to reflect the relocation of the proposed public park as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. 3. Green Element • Amend “Figure G-1: Green Plan” of the Green Element of the General Plan to reflect the relocation of the public park as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does hereby find and determine and recommends that the City Council so find and determine as follows: 1. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00506 maintains internal consistency with the General Plan. The proposed modifications to the Land Use Element, Circulation Element, and Green Element of the General Plan are consistent with Goals 5.1 and 15.1 of the Land Use Element to create and enhance dynamic, identifiable places for the benefit of Anaheim residents, employees and visitors, and to continue to establish The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades, which is consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan for the Mixed Use land use designation and the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, as proposed to be amended by, and contingent upon and subject to the approval by the City Council of, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, now pending; 2. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00506 would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the proposed relocation of the public park is consistent with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan encouraging mixed-use and commercial development that provides safe, protected places for pedestrians to walk, attractive surroundings, opportunities for social interaction, and comfortable places to sit and relax; 3. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00506 continues to be consistent with the intent of the General Plan and would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and 4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00506 is physically suitable to accommodate the proposed modifications, including but not limited to, access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses because the proposed public park meets the size requirements outlined in the Platinum Triangle Overlay Zone and because the park is integrated into a mixed-use development, and will further the goals of the General Plan. -9- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations and based upon a thorough review of proposed General Plan Amendment 2015- 00506, Addendum No. 5, the other CEQA Documents, and the evidence received to date, does hereby approve and recommends that the City Council approve General Plan Amendment 2015-00506, as shown on Exhibits A through C attached to this Resolution, contingent upon and subject to the approval of (1) the other Proposed New Entitlements, specifically, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, now pending; and (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and all of the conditions set forth in a separate resolution of this Planning Commission adopted substantially concurrently with this Resolution relating to the proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -10- PC2016-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -11- PC2016-*** EXHIBIT "A" Le w i s S t St a t e C o l l e g e B l v d Do u g l a s s R d Gene Autry Way Cerritos A v e k Existing Land Use Plan Figure LU-4 Page LU-13 City of Anaheim General Plan Program Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: March 17, 201600.1 0.20.05 Miles Note: Land Use Map includes Anaheim's Sphere of Influence. Commercial General Commercial Recreation Residential Medium (0-36.0 du/ac) Low Medium (0-18.0 du/ac) Low Medium Hillside (0-6 du/ac) Low (0-6.5 du/ac) Office High Low Industrial Institutional School Open Space Parks Railroad Mixed-Use City Boundary Intermodal Transportation Centerk 3656 ATTACHMENT NO. 3a L e w i s S t S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d D o u g l a s s R d Gene Autry Way Cerritos A v e k Proposed Land Use Plan Figure LU-4 Page LU-13 City of Anaheim General Plan Program 0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles Note: Land Use Map includes Anaheim's Sphere of Influence. Commercial General Commercial Recreation Residential Medium (0-36.0 du/ac) Low Medium (0-18.0 du/ac) Low Medium Hillside (0-6 du/ac) Low (0-6.5 du/ac) Office High Low Industrial Institutional School Open Space Parks Railroad Mixed-Use City Boundary Intermodal Transportation Centerk 3656 -12- PC2016-*** EXHIBIT "B" kLewis S t S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d D o u g l a s s R d Gene Autry Way Cerritos A v e Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities (Existing) Figure C-5 Page C-33 City of Anaheim General Plan Program Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: March 17, 201600.1 0.20.05 Miles 3656 City Boundary Transit Stationk Proposed Top PriorityClass II Bikeway Proposed 2nd PriorityClass II Bikeway Proposed 3rd PiorityClass II Bikeway Existing Class I BikewayExisitng Class II BikewayExisting Off Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed 2nd PriorityClass I BikewayProposed 3rd PriorityClass I Bikeway Parks/Open Space Sphere-of-Influence kLewis S t S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d D o u g l a s s R d Gene Autry Way Cerritos A v e Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities (Proposed) Figure C-5 Page C-33 City of Anaheim General Plan Program 0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles 3656 City Boundary Transit Stationk Proposed Top PriorityClass II Bikeway Proposed 2nd PriorityClass II Bikeway Proposed 3rd PiorityClass II Bikeway Existing Class I BikewayExisitng Class II BikewayExisting Off Road TrailProposed Off Road TrailProposed 2nd PriorityClass I BikewayProposed 3rd PriorityClass I Bikeway Parks/Open Space Sphere-of-Influence -13- PC2016-*** EXHIBIT "C" L e w i s S t S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d D o u g l a s s R d Gene Autry Way Cerritos A v e Existing Green Plan Figure G-1 Page G-5 City of Anaheim General Plan Program Adopted: May 25, 2004Revised: December 16, 201500.1 0.20.05 Miles 3656 Public Parks Open Space Water Uses City Boundary Cultural Facilities$+ General School Location")S General Park Location!(P Riding/Hiking, Pedestrian and Mountain Bike Trail Park Deficiency Areas* *Residential areas outside half-mile radius of Neighborhood or Community Park or quarter- mile radius of a Mini Park. L e w i s S t S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d D o u g l a s s R d Gene Autry Way Cerritos A v e Proposed Green Plan Figure G-1 Page G-5 City of Anaheim General Plan Program 0 0.1 0.20.05 Miles 3656 Public Parks Open Space Water Uses City Boundary Cultural Facilities$+ General School Location")S General Park Location!(P Riding/Hiking, Pedestrian and Mountain Bike Trail Park Deficiency Areas* *Residential areas outside half-mile radius of Neighborhood or Community Park or quarter- mile radius of a Mini Park. [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 4 -1- PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL AMEND THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MASTER LAND USE PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2015-00621) (DEV2015-00078) WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center ("ARTIC"), and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were either developed or renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. - 2- PC2016-*** Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the aforementioned development intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007 and in response to the application of AMB Property, LP (“Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of a mixed-use master planned community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses, up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 1.7-acre public park, and related improvements (the "Original Project") on certain real property consisting of approximately 17.5 acres and bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the north, and Artisan - 3- PC2016-*** Court on the south (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 335, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 143, were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original Project; and WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00446, to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2006-00162 to amend the PTMLUP to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (3) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2007-00054 to amend The PTMU Overlay Zone to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (4) Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05134 to permit building heights over 100 feet (up to 300 feet proposed) for the proposed Gene Autry Experience project; (5) Development Agreement No. 2006-00004; and (6) Tentative Tract Map No. 17089 to establish a 21-lot, mixed use subdivision with 1,208 residential units; 100,000 square feet of office uses; and, 50,000 square feet of commercial uses (collectively, the “Original Development Approvals”); and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007, the City Council approved the Original Development Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the Original Development Agreement on or about September 11, 2007, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange on November 16, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000687363 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code - 4- PC2016-*** Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the Original Owner's request for an amendment to the Original Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial period of ten (10) years was approved by the City Council on September 25, 2012. Accordingly, on or about October 2, 2012, the City and Original Owner entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on October 25, 2012 as Instrument No. 652444 (“Amendment No. 1”); and WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Existing Entitlements”; and WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No. 1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report had occurred; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107") to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the "Mixed-Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and - 5- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum Gateway Project"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No. 3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005-11105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No. 6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No. 4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1-acre (approximate) property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the "A-Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A-Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim received a verified petition from the Owner to approve a proposed amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, designated as Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, to, among other things, remove one public park and relocate another public park as well as reconfigure the Property’s circulation system, street types and street-section design based on a new Tentative Parcel Map for the "Project" (as defined - 6- PC2016-*** below). Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621 is proposed in conjunction with the Owner's application for the following additional entitlements, which, together with Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, are intended to permit the development of approximately, but not to exceed, 1,079 residential dwelling units inclusive of 12 live/work units, a public park consisting of approximately 1.1 acres, and approximately, but not to exceed, 98,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses, and a network of local streets (the "Project"): 1. An amendment to the General Plan to reflect the relocation and combination of the two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use ("General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506"); 2. Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested development rights in connection therewith; 3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed apartment buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and public recreation/park areas to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015- 00621, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, and Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed New Entitlements"; and WHEREAS, in connection with the Proposed New Entitlements, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, has been prepared in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the previously-approved FSEIR No. 339 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe. FSEIR No. 339, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No. 2, Addendum No. 3, Addendum No. 4, and Addendum No. 5, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), and the State CEQA Guidelines relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Addendum No. 5 and for and against the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and - 7- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission has found and determined and has recommended that the City Council so find and determine the following: 1. That Addendum No. 5 together with the other CEQA Documents collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project; and 2. That, pursuant to the findings contained in said concurrent resolution, the CEQA Documents satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and, together with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 330 for the Project, should be approved and adopted; and 3. That no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project. WHEREAS, the Property consists of 1 parcel currently designated for use as “Mixed Use and Open Space" on the land use map of the General Plan. This parcel is zoned "I" Industrial and is located within the Gene Autry District of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and, as such, is subject to and must comply with the land use intensities and the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code; and WHEREAS, proposed Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, would amend the PTMLUP to make it consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, as adopted; and WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project, including Addendum No. 5, together with the other CEQA Documents, this Planning Commission has heretofore adopted its Resolution recommending that the City Council amend the General Plan by approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506; and WHEREAS, in order to make the PTMLUP consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, as adopted, this Planning Commission desires to recommend that the City Council approve and adopt proposed Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621 in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly - 8- PC2016-*** declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of proposed Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, Addendum No. 5, the other CEQA Documents, and the evidence received to date, the Planning Commission does hereby approve and recommends that the City Council approve Miscellaneous Case No. 2015- 00621, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, contingent upon and subject to (1) approval of the other Proposed New Entitlements, specifically, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, now pending; and (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and all of the conditions set forth in a separate resolution of this Planning Commission adopted substantially concurrently with this Resolution relating to the proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 9- PC2016-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTACHMENT NO. 4a [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 5 -1- PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2015- 00002 BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND JEFFERSON AT STADIUM PARK, L.P., AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2015-00002) (DEV2015-00078) WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center ("ARTIC"), and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were either developed or renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new -2- PC2016-*** office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the aforementioned development intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007 and in response to the application of AMB Property, LP (“Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of a mixed-use master planned community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses, up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 1.7-acre public park, and related improvements (the "Original Project") on certain real property consisting of approximately 17.5 acres and -3- PC2016-*** bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the north, and Artisan Court on the south (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 335, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 143, were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original Project; and WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00446, to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2006-00162 to amend the PTMLUP to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (3) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2007-00054 to amend The PTMU Overlay Zone to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (4) Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05134 to permit building heights over 100 feet (up to 300 feet proposed) for the proposed Gene Autry Experience project; (5) Development Agreement No. 2006-00004; and (6) Tentative Tract Map No. 17089 to establish a 21-lot, mixed use subdivision with 1,208 residential units; 100,000 square feet of office uses; and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses (collectively, the “Original Development Approvals”); and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007, the City Council approved the Original Development Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the Original Development Agreement on or about September 11, 2007, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange on November 16, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000687363 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General -4- PC2016-*** Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the Original Owner's request for an amendment to the Original Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial period of ten (10) years was approved by the City Council on September 25, 2012. Accordingly, on or about October 2, 2012, the City and Original Owner entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on October 25, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012000652444 (“Amendment No. 1”); and WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Existing Entitlements”; and WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No. 1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report had occurred; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107") to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the "Mixed-Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and -5- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum Gateway Project"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No. 3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005-11105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No. 6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No. 4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1-acre (approximate) property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the "A-Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A-Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of 1 parcel currently designated for use as “Mixed Use and Open Space" on the land use map of the General Plan. This parcel is zoned "I" Industrial and is located within the Gene Autry District of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and, as such, is subject to and must comply with the land use intensities and the development -6- PC2016-*** standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim received a verified petition from the Owner to approve proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, to provide for the development of the "Project" (as defined below) and certain vested development rights in connection therewith. Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 is proposed in conjunction with the Owner's application for the following additional entitlements, which, together with Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, are intended to permit the development of approximately, but not to exceed, 1,079 residential dwelling units inclusive of 12 live/work units, a public park consisting of approximately 1.1 acres, and approximately, but not to exceed, 98,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses, and a network of local streets (the "Project"): 1. An amendment to the General Plan to reflect the relocation and combination of the two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use ("General Plan Amendment No. 2015- 00506"); 2. An amendment to the PTMLUP to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 201-00506 to, among other things, reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621"); 3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed apartment buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and public recreation/park areas to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015- 00621, Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed New Entitlements"; and WHEREAS, in connection with the Proposed New Entitlements, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, has been prepared in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the previously-approved FSEIR No. 339 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe. FSEIR No. 339, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No. 2, Addendum No. 3, Addendum No. 4, and Addendum No. 5, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), and the State CEQA Guidelines relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and -7- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Addendum No. 5 and for and against the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission has found and determined and has recommended that the City Council so find and determine the following: 1. That Addendum No. 5 together with the other CEQA Documents collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project; and 2. That, pursuant to the findings contained in said concurrent resolution, the CEQA Documents satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and, together with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 330 for the Project, should be approved and adopted; and 3. That no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project. WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project, including Addendum No. 5, together with the other CEQA Documents, this Planning Commission has heretofore adopted its Resolutions recommending that the City Council (1) amend the General Plan by approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, (2) amend the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan by approving and adopting Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, and (3) approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine that proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at this meeting, meets all of the standards and requirements set forth in Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”), which was adopted by the City Council on November 23, 1982, that is: 1. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 is consistent with the General Plan, upon the adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 2015- 00506, now pending, and with the goals, policies, programs and objectives specified in the General Plan, as so amended, and the Platinum Triangle Master -8- PC2016-*** Land Use Plan, as the same shall be amended by the adoption of Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, now pending; 2. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 is compatible with the uses authorized in, and the regulations prescribed for, the applicable zoning district(s) in which the proposed Project is and will be located, and is consistent with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone requirements; 3. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area in that it is in conformance with and implements the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone requirements; 4. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim; and 5. The proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 constitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power and authority under, is entered into pursuant to, and is in compliance with the City’s charter powers, the requirements of Section 65867 of California Government Code and the Procedures Resolution; and. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations and based upon a thorough review of proposed Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, Addendum No. 5, the other CEQA Documents, and the evidence received to date, the Planning Commission does hereby approve and recommends that the City Council approve Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at this meeting, contingent upon and subject to (1) the approval of the other Proposed New Entitlements, specifically, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174; (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project; and (3) the conditions of approval set forth as Exhibit C to Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of -9- PC2016-*** competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM 1 RECORDING REQUESTED BY AND WHEN RECORDED RETURN TO: City Clerk City of Anaheim P.O. Box 3222 Anaheim, California 92805 ______________________________________________________________________________ (SPACE ABOVE LINE FOR RECORDER’S USE ONLY) DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. _______ BETWEEN CITY OF ANAHEIM AND JEFFERSON AT STADIUM PARK, L.P. ATTACHMENT NO. 5a TABLE OF CONTENTS Page i Section 1. DEFINITIONS .........................................................................................................8 1.1 Assessment District ................................................................................................. 8 1.2 Authorizing Ordinance............................................................................................ 8 1.3 CITY ....................................................................................................................... 8 1.4 CITY Agency or CITY Agencies ........................................................................... 8 1.5 Development ........................................................................................................... 8 1.6 Development Agreement ........................................................................................ 8 1.7 Development Agreement Date ................................................................................ 8 1.8 Development Agreement Statute ............................................................................ 8 1.9 Development Approvals ......................................................................................... 8 1.10 Enabling Ordinance ................................................................................................ 9 1.11 Existing Land Use Regulations ............................................................................... 9 1.12 Final Site Plans ....................................................................................................... 9 1.13 Gross Floor Area/GFA ............................................................................................ 9 1.14 Interim Development Fees ...................................................................................... 9 1.15 Mortgage ................................................................................................................. 9 1.16 Mortgagee ............................................................................................................... 9 1.17 Owner ...................................................................................................................... 9 1.18 Parking Areas ........................................................................................................ 10 1.19 Permitted Development ........................................................................................ 10 1.20 Platinum Triangle.................................................................................................. 10 1.21 Procedures Resolution .......................................................................................... 10 1.22 Project ................................................................................................................... 10 1.23 Property ................................................................................................................. 10 1.24 Public Improvements ............................................................................................ 10 1.25 Storm-water Management Improvements ............................................................. 10 1.26 Term ...................................................................................................................... 11 1.27 Zoning Code.......................................................................................................... 11 Section 2. TERM ....................................................................................................................11 Section 3. BINDING COVENANTS .....................................................................................11 Section 4. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT .................................................................................12 Section 5. PROJECT LAND USES ........................................................................................12 Section 6. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT...........................................................................12 6.1 Description of Permitted Development ................................................................ 12 6.2 Parking Areas ........................................................................................................ 12 Section 7. DENSITY OF PERMITTED BUILDINGS ..........................................................13 Section 8. ENFORCEMENT ..................................................................................................13 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page ii Section 9. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES ...................................................13 9.1 General .................................................................................................................. 13 9.2 Public Park ............................................................................................................ 14 9.3 Utilities (Water, Electrical, Gas, Sewer, and Drainage) ....................................... 15 9.3.1 Water Service ........................................................................................................ 15 9.3.2 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains ......................................................................... 15 9.4 Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities ............... 15 9.5 Maintenance and Operation of Public Improvements by OWNER and Successors ............................................................................................................. 16 9.6 Traffic Circulation Improvements ........................................................................ 17 9.7 Permits to Enter CITY Property ........................................................................... 17 Section 10. REIMBURSEMENT PROVISION .......................................................................17 Section 11. DEDICATIONS AND EXACTIONS ...................................................................17 Section 12. FEES, TAXES, AND ASSESSMENTS ................................................................18 12.1 Fees, Taxes and Assessments ............................................................................... 18 12.2 Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees ...................................................... 18 12.2.1 Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee ............................................................... 18 12.2.2 General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee ................................................. 18 12.2.3 Library Facilities Fee ............................................................................................ 19 12.3 Excluded Development Fees................................................................................. 19 12.3.1 Water Utilities Fees............................................................................................... 19 12.3.2 Electrical Utilities Fees ......................................................................................... 19 12.3.3 CITY Processing Fees........................................................................................... 19 12.4 Platinum Triangle Infrastructure and/or Maintenance Assessment District ......... 19 12.5 Accounting of Funds ............................................................................................. 19 12.6 Imposition of Increased Fees, Taxes or Assessments ........................................... 19 Section 13. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS ......................................20 Section 14. NEXUS/REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGES ..............................20 Section 15. TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT ............................................................................20 Section 16. EXISTING USES ..................................................................................................20 Section 17. FUTURE APPROVALS ........................................................................................21 17.1 Basis for Denying or Conditionally Granting Future Approvals .......................... 21 17.2 Standard of Review ............................................................................................... 21 17.3 Future Amendments to Final Site Plans................................................................ 21 Section 18. AMENDMENT......................................................................................................21 18.1 Initiation of Amendment ....................................................................................... 21 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page iii 18.2 Procedure .............................................................................................................. 21 18.3 Consent ................................................................................................................. 21 18.4 Amendments ......................................................................................................... 22 18.5 Effect of Amendment to Development Agreement .............................................. 22 18.6 ............................................................................................................................... 22 Section 19. NON-CANCELLATION OF RIGHTS .................................................................22 Section 20. BENEFITS TO CITY ............................................................................................23 Section 21. BENEFITS TO OWNER .......................................................................................23 Section 22. UNDERTAKINGS AND ASSURANCES CONTEMPLATED AND PROMOTED BY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT STATUTE ........................23 Section 23. RESERVED AUTHORITY...................................................................................24 23.1 State and Federal Laws and Regulations .............................................................. 24 23.2 Model Codes ......................................................................................................... 24 23.3 Public Health and Safety ....................................................................................... 24 Section 24. CANCELLATION .................................................................................................24 24.1 Initiation of Cancellation ...................................................................................... 24 24.2 Procedure .............................................................................................................. 24 24.3 Consent of OWNER and CITY ............................................................................ 24 Section 25. PERIODIC REVIEW.............................................................................................25 25.1 Time for Review ................................................................................................... 25 25.2 Owner’s Submission ............................................................................................. 25 25.3 Findings................................................................................................................. 25 25.4 Initiation of Review by City Council .................................................................... 25 Section 26. EVENTS OF DEFAULT .......................................................................................26 26.1 Default by OWNER .............................................................................................. 26 26.1.1 Default................................................................................................................... 26 26.1.2 Notice of Default................................................................................................... 26 26.1.3 Termination for Failure to Cure Default ............................................................... 26 26.1.4 Specific Performance ............................................................................................ 26 26.2 Default by CITY ................................................................................................... 27 26.2.1 Notice of Default................................................................................................... 27 26.2.2 Specific Performance and Mandamus .................................................................. 27 Section 27. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION ...............................................................28 27.1 Notice to Owner .................................................................................................... 28 27.2 Public Hearing ...................................................................................................... 28 27.3 Decision ................................................................................................................ 28 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page iv 27.4 Standard of Review ............................................................................................... 28 27.5 Implementation ..................................................................................................... 28 27.6 Schedule for Compliance ...................................................................................... 28 Section 28. ASSIGNMENT ......................................................................................................29 28.1 Right to Assign ..................................................................................................... 29 28.2 Release Upon Transfer .......................................................................................... 29 Section 29. NO CONFLICTING ENACTMENTS ..................................................................30 Section 30. GENERAL .............................................................................................................30 30.1 Force Majeure ....................................................................................................... 30 30.2 Construction of Development Agreement ............................................................ 31 30.3 Severability ........................................................................................................... 31 30.4 Hold Harmless Agreement; Indemnity ................................................................. 31 30.5 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge ....................................................... 32 30.6 Public Agency Coordination ................................................................................. 33 30.7 Initiative Measures ................................................................................................ 33 30.8 No Waiver ............................................................................................................. 33 30.9 Authority to Execute ............................................................................................. 33 30.10 Notice .................................................................................................................... 34 30.10.1 To Owner .............................................................................................................. 34 30.10.2 To CITY ................................................................................................................ 34 30.11 Captions ................................................................................................................ 35 30.12 Consent ................................................................................................................. 35 30.13 Further Actions and Instruments ........................................................................... 35 30.14 Subsequent Amendment to Authorizing Statute ................................................... 35 30.15 Governing Law ..................................................................................................... 35 30.16 Effect on Title ....................................................................................................... 35 30.17 Mortgagee Protection ............................................................................................ 35 30.18 Notice of Default to Mortgagee, Right of Mortgagee to Cure .............................. 36 30.19 Bankruptcy ............................................................................................................ 36 30.20 Disaffirmance ........................................................................................................ 36 30.21 Recitals .................................................................................................................. 37 30.22 Recording .............................................................................................................. 37 30.23 Title Report ........................................................................................................... 37 30.24 Entire Agreement .................................................................................................. 38 30.25 Successors and Assigns......................................................................................... 38 30.26 Owner’s Title of Property ..................................................................................... 38 30.27 Recitals and Exhibits............................................................................................. 38 30.28 Estoppel Certificates ............................................................................................. 38 30.29 Organization and Standing of OWNER ................................................................ 38 30.30 Authorization and Consents .................................................................................. 39 30.31 Time of the Essence .............................................................................................. 39 TABLE OF CONTENTS (continued) Page v 30.32 Prior Development Agreement Superseded .......................................................... 39 LIST OF EXHIBITS Exhibit “A” Legal Description of the Property Exhibit “B-1” Final Site Plan No. 2015-00003 Exhibit “B-2” Final Site Plan No. 2015-00004 Exhibit “B-3” Final Site Plan No. 2015-00005 Exhibit “C” Conditions of Approval Exhibit “D” Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees Exhibit “D-1” Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee Exhibit “D-2” General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee Exhibit “D-3” Library Facilities Fee Exhibit “E” Development Requirements and Maintenance Obligations Exhibit “F” Preliminary Title Report Exhibit “G” Traffic Circulation Improvements Exhibit “H” Infrastructure Phasing Plan 1 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO.____________ BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND JEFFERSON AT STADIUM PARK, L.P. THIS DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT is entered into this day of _________, 2016, by and between the CITY OF ANAHEIM, a charter city and municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under the Constitution and laws of the State of California (hereinafter “CITY”), and JEFFERSON AT STADIUM PARK, L.P., a Texas limited partnership (hereinafter “OWNER”), pursuant to the authority set forth in Article 2.5 of Chapter 4 of Division l of Title 7, Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code (the “Development Agreement Statute”) , the CITY’s inherent power as a charter city, and the Development Agreement Act implementing procedures adopted by the CITY in Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”). RECITALS This Development Agreement is predicated upon the following facts: A. To strengthen the public planning process, encourage private participation in comprehensive planning, and reduce the economic risk of development, the Legislature of the State of California adopted the Development Agreement Statute, Sections 65864, et seq., of the Government Code. The Development Agreement Statute authorizes CITY to enter into binding development agreements with persons having legal or equitable interests in real property for the development of such property in order to, among other things: encourage and provide for the development of public facilities in order to support development projects; provide certainty in the approval of development projects in order to avoid the waste of resources and the escalation in project costs and encourage investment in and commitment to comprehensive planning which will make maximum efficient utilization of resources at the least economic cost to the public; and provide assurance to the applicants of development projects (1) that they may proceed with their projects in accordance with existing policies, rules and regulations, subject to the conditions of approval of such projects and provisions of such development agreements, and (2) encourage private participation in comprehensive planning and reduce the private and public economic costs of development. B. CITY enacted Ordinance No. 4377 on November 23, 1982, which makes CITY subject to the Development Agreement Statute. Pursuant to Section 65865 of the Development Agreement Statute, CITY adopted Resolution No. 82R-565 (the “Procedures Resolution”) on November 23, 1982. The Procedures Resolution establishes procedures and requirements for the consideration of development agreements upon receipt of an application. C. These Recitals refer to and utilize certain capitalized terms which are defined in this Development Agreement. The parties intend to refer to those definitions in conjunction with the use thereof in these Recitals. 2 D. On May 25, 2004, the Anaheim City Council approved General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419, setting forth the CITY’s vision for development of the City of Anaheim (the “General Plan Amendment”), and certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, adopting Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Plans (“FEIR No. 330”), in conjunction with its consideration and approval of the General Plan Amendment, an amendment of CITY’s Zoning Code, and a series of related actions. E. CITY desires that the approximately 820-acre area generally bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company Easement on the north (hereinafter called “Platinum Triangle”) be developed as a combination of high quality industrial, office, commercial and residential uses, as envisioned in the General Plan Amendment. F. In order to carry out the goals and policies of the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle, on August 17, 2004, the City Council approved the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, setting forth the new vision for the Platinum Triangle. G. To further implement the goals and policies of the General Plan for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council has established the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone (hereinafter the “PTMU Overlay Zone”) consisting of approximately three hundred and eighty-three acres, including the Property (as herein after defined), within the Platinum Triangle as depicted in the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan to provide opportunities for high quality well-designed development projects that could be stand-alone projects or combine residential with non-residential uses including office, retail, live/work units, business services, personal services, public spaces and uses, and other community amenities within the area. H. On October 25, 2005, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations and the updated and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A (“FSEIR No. 332”) to provide for the implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005- 00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036 and a series of related actions. I. On October 26, 2010, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471, approved an amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188), and certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008-00339 (“FSEIR No. 339”), to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,909 dwelling units, to increase the maximum number of commercial square footage to 4,909,682, to increase the maximum number of office square footage to 14,340,522, and to increase the maximum number of square feet of institutional land uses to 1,500,000 square feet. J. On December 18, 2012, the City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2012- 00486 and approved amendments to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (“Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559”) and the PTMU Overlay Zone (“Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107”) to reduce the maximum number of office square footage to 3 14,131,103, to reduce the maximum number of commercial square footage to 4,795,111, and to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,988, and to amend various other provisions of the General Plan. K. On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit an increase in the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 for a master planned mixed use project on a 4.13 acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005-1105 East Katella Avenue. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. Subsequent to the adoption of this Ordinance, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015, which had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027. L. On October 20, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A-Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way. M. OWNER represents that it owns in fee approximately 17.6 acres of real property located at the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange (hereinafter “County”), State of California in the Platinum Triangle and zoned PTMU Overlay and more particularly shown and described on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference (hereinafter referred to as the “Property”). N. On August 21, 2007, the CITY certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 335, adopting Findings of Fact and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and associated Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 143 (“FEIR No. 335”) and approved by resolution General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00446, an Amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (Miscellaneous Permit No. 2007-00162) and approved the introduction of Zoning Code Amendment No. 2007-00054 to facilitate development of the “Gene Autry Experience” Project on the Property. O. The CITY and AMB Property, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, a prior owner of the Property, entered into that certain Development Agreement No. 2006-00004, dated September 11, 2007, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County (“Official Records”) on November 16, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000687363 (the “AMB Development Agreement”), which provided for the development of a mixed-use master planned community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, up to 4 100,000 square feet of office uses, a 1.7-acre public park to be located at the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way, and related improvements on the Property (the “Original Development Approvals”). P. On September 25, 2012, the City Council approved a request to extend the initial term of Development Agreement No. 2006-00004 such that the initial term of the AMB Development Agreement, as amended, would extend until November 16, 2017. Accordingly, the CITY and AMB Platinum, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, as successor in interest to AMB Property, L.P., entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Development Agreement No. 2006-00004, which was recorded in the Official Records on October 25, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012000652444 (“Amendment No. 1”). The AMB Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Existing Development Agreement”. The Existing Development Agreement would also be eligible for two additional extensions of five years each, thus allowing the Existing Development Agreement to continue in effect until 2027 if certain development milestones are met. Q. Subsequent to the recordation of Amendment No. 1, the fee title interest in the Property was transferred from, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned by, AMB Platinum, LLC to OWNER. By its signature herein below, OWNER hereby represents and warrants to CITY that (i) AMB Platinum, LLC has heretofore unconditionally assigned to OWNER all of its rights, title and interest and its obligations and liabilities under the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals, together with any and all of its respective rights and obligations under any and all other documents and entitlements related to the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals; (ii) OWNER accepted such assignment and assumed and agreed to perform all of AMB Platinum, LLC’s liabilities, obligations, covenants, agreements, terms, provisions and conditions under the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals and liabilities, obligations, covenants, agreements, terms, provisions and conditions under any and all other documents related to the Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals; and (iii) only OWNER (i.e., not AMB Platinum, LLC) is liable for the performance of all obligations of “OWNER” (as defined in the Existing Development Agreement) pursuant to the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals. R. Economic conditions have delayed development on the Property. However, OWNER has acquired the Property from AMB Platinum, LLC, the successor in interest to AMB Property, L.P., and now desires to develop the Property in accordance with the provisions of this Development Agreement by creating a mixed-use community up to 1,079 residential units, inclusive of twelve (12) live/work units, up to 9,800 square feet of commercial uses, a new public park and other amenities, all as more particularly set forth in the Final Site Plans (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Project”). S. Pursuant to Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, OWNER has requested a series of actions to replace the Original Development Approvals (collectively, the “Development Approvals”), including: 5 1. General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506 to reflect the relocation and combination of the two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use; 2. Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621 to amend the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan to, among other things, reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments; 3. This Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 in order to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested development rights in connection therewith; 4. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed apartment buildings and one lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the new alignment and configuration of internal public and private streets and a public recreation/park area to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; 5. Final Site Plan No. 2015-00003, attached hereto as Exhibit “B-1” and incorporated herein by this reference, to permit an approximately 370-unit, five-story wrap apartment building near the western boundary of the site (herein referred to as “Phase 1 of the Project” or “Phase 1”); 6. Final Site Plan No. 2015-00004, attached hereto as Exhibit “B-2” and incorporated herein by this reference, to permit a mixed-use, five-story wrap community near the center of the site with approximately 376 units, including 12 live/work units (herein referred to as “Phase 2 of the Project” or “Phase 2”); 7. Final Site Plan No. 2015-00005, attached hereto as Exhibit “B-3” and incorporated herein by this reference, to permit a mixed-use, four-story podium building with approximately 333 units and approximately, but not to exceed, 9,800 square feet of retail space (herein referred to as “Phase 3 of the Project” or “Phase 3”); and 8. Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339. T. CITY desires to accomplish the goals and objectives set forth in the CITY’s General Plan and the objectives for the PTMU Overlay Zone as set forth in subsection 18.20.010.020 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and finds that the Project will accomplish said goals and objectives. U. OWNER further anticipates the submission of detailed construction plans and other documentation required by CITY in order for the OWNER to obtain its building permits. V. As consideration for the benefits gained from the vested rights acquired pursuant to the Development Agreement Statute, to conform with the requirements of the PTMU Overlay Zone, and to comply with the applicable mitigation measures imposed by Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the Project, CITY is requiring that OWNER construct and install certain Public 6 Improvements, including off-site traffic circulation improvements, and provide other public benefits as further described herein. W. In order to avoid any misunderstandings or disputes which may arise from time to time between OWNER and CITY concerning the proposed development of the Project and to assure each party of the intention of the other as to the processing of any land use entitlements which now or hereafter may be required for such development, the parties believe it is desirable to set forth their intentions and understandings in this Development Agreement. In order for both CITY and OWNER to achieve their respective objectives, it is imperative that each be as certain as possible that OWNER will develop and that CITY will permit OWNER to develop the Project and Public Improvements as approved by CITY within the time periods provided in this Development Agreement. X. OWNER and CITY intend for this Development Agreement (to the extent it hereafter becomes final and binding and no longer subject to challenge, referendum, litigation or appeal) to supersede the Existing Development Agreement and for the Existing Development Agreement to thereafter be of no further force and effect. Y. On March 21, 2016, as required by Section 1.0 of the Procedures Resolution, OWNER submitted to the Planning Department an application for approval of a development agreement (hereinafter called the “Application”). The Application included a proposed development agreement (the “Proposed Development Agreement”). Z. On May 3, 2016, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Statute and Section 2.1 of the Procedures Resolution, the Planning Director gave public notice of the City Planning Commission’s intention to consider a recommendation to the City Council regarding adoption of a development agreement. AA. On May 16, 2016, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Statute and Section 2.2 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Planning Commission held a public hearing on the Application. BB. On that date, the City Planning Commission, after considering the requirements of CEQA, including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, reviewed and considered the information contained within the previously-certified FSEIR No. 339, together with Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C for the Platinum Triangle, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330, found and determined that the FSEIR and Addendum No. 5 reflected the independent judgment of the Planning Commission and are collectively adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this Development Agreement and related Development Approvals, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation needed be prepared for this Development Agreement. CC. The Planning Commission further found that this Development Agreement meets the following standards set forth in Section 2.3 of the Procedures Resolution, to wit, that the Proposed Project: (i) is consistent with the CITY’s existing General Plan, (ii) is compatible with the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed for the applicable zoning district, (iii) is 7 compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area and (iv) is not otherwise detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of CITY. Based upon the aforesaid findings, the City Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve the Application and this Development Agreement pursuant to Resolution No. PC2016-_______. DD. On _______, 2016, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Statute and Section 3.1 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Clerk caused public notice to be given of the City Council’s intention to consider adoption of a development agreement. EE. On _______, 2016, as required by Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Statute and Section 3.2 of the Procedures Resolution, the City Council held a public hearing on the Application. FF. On that date, the City Council, after considering the requirements of CEQA, including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, reviewed and considered the information contained within the previously-certified FSEIR No. 339, together with Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C for the Platinum Triangle, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 , found and determined that the FSEIR and Addendum No. 5 reflected the independent judgment of the City Council and are collectively adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this Development Agreement and related Development Approvals, and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation needed be prepared for this Development Agreement. GG. On _______, 2016, the City Council found and determined that this Development Agreement: (i) is consistent with the CITY’s existing General Plan; (ii) is not otherwise detrimental to the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of CITY; (iii) is entered into pursuant to and constitutes a present exercise of the CITY’s police power; and (iv) is entered into pursuant to and in compliance with the requirements of Section 65867 of the Development Agreement Statute and the Procedures Resolution. HH. In granting the Development Approvals, CITY considered the health, safety and general welfare of the residents of the City of Anaheim and carefully considered and determined the projected needs (taking into consideration the planned development of the Project and all other areas within the City of Anaheim) for water service, sewer service, storm drains, electrical facilities, traffic/circulation infrastructure, police and fire services, paramedic and similar improvements, facilities and services within the Platinum Triangle, and the appropriateness of the density and intensity of the development comprising the Project and the needs of the CITY and surrounding areas for other infrastructure. II. On _______, 2016, the City Council adopted the Authorizing Ordinance authorizing the execution of this Development Agreement. NOW, THEREFORE, pursuant to the authority contained in the Development Agreement Statute, as it applies to CITY, and pursuant to the Enabling Ordinance, the Procedures 8 Resolution and the CITY’s inherent powers as a charter city, and pursuant to the mutual promises and covenants herein contained, the parties hereto agree as follows: Section 1. DEFINITIONS. The following words and phrases are used as defined terms throughout this Development Agreement, and each defined term shall have the meaning set forth below. 1.1 Assessment District. “Assessment District” for purposes of this Development Agreement means a special district, assessment district or benefit area existing pursuant to State law or the charter powers of the CITY for purposes of financing the cost of Public Improvements, facilities, services and/or public facilities fees within a distinct geographic area of the CITY. 1.2 Authorizing Ordinance. The “Authorizing Ordinance” means Ordinance No. ______ approving this Development Agreement. 1.3 CITY. The “CITY” means the City of Anaheim, a charter city and municipal corporation, duly organized and existing under its charter and the Constitution and laws of the State of California. 1.4 CITY Agency or CITY Agencies. “CITY Agency” or “CITY Agencies” mean, where appropriate, all CITY departments, agencies, boards and commissions including those that have subdivision or other permit, entitlement or approval authority or jurisdiction over the Property or any Public Improvements located on or off the Property. 1.5 Development. “Development” means the improvement of the Property for purposes of effecting the structures, improvements and facilities comprising the Project, including, without limitation: grading, the construction of infrastructure and public facilities related to the Project whether located within or outside the Property; the construction of structures and buildings and the installation of landscaping. 1.6 Development Agreement. “Development Agreement” means this Development Agreement and any subsequent amendments to this Development Agreement, which have been made in compliance with the provisions of this Development Agreement, the Development Agreement Statute, the Enabling Ordinance, and the Procedures Resolution. 1.7 Development Agreement Date. The “Development Agreement Date” means the effective date of the Authorizing Ordinance. 1.8 Development Agreement Statute. The “Development Agreement Statute” means Sections 65864 through 65869.5 of the California Government Code as it exists on the Development Agreement Date. 1.9 Development Approvals. “Development Approvals” means the Final Site Plans and all site specific plans, maps, permits and other entitlements to use of every kind and nature contemplated by the Final Site Plans which are approved or granted by CITY in connection with development of the Property, including, but not limited to: site plans, tentative and final 9 subdivision maps, vesting tentative maps, variances, conditional use permits and grading, building and other similar permits. To the extent any of such site specific plans, maps, permits and other entitlements to use are amended from time to time, upon the application of or with the written consent of the OWNER, “Development Approvals” shall include such matters as so amended. If this Development Agreement is required by law to be amended in order for “Development Approvals” to include any such amendments, “Development Approvals” shall not include such amendments unless and until this Development Agreement is so amended. 1.10 Enabling Ordinance. The “Enabling Ordinance” means Ordinance No. 4377 enacted by the CITY on November 23, 1982. 1.11 Existing Land Use Regulations. “Existing Land Use Regulations” mean the ordinances and regulations adopted by the CITY in effect on the Development Agreement Date, including those certain adopting ordinances and regulations that govern the permitted uses of land, the density and intensity of use, and the design, improvement, construction standards and specifications applicable to the development of the Property, including, but not limited to, the General Plan, the Zoning Code, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, previously- certified FSEIR No. 339, together with Addendum No. 5 thereto, Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106C, Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 and all other ordinances of the CITY establishing subdivision standards, park regulations, impact or development fees, and building, signage and improvement standards but only to the extent the Zoning Code and such other regulations are not inconsistent with this Development Agreement. Existing Land Use Regulations do not include non-land use regulations (including taxes), but do include the provisions of Chapter 17.38 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 1.12 Final Site Plans. The “Final Site Plans” means the Project as described in this Development Agreement and conditions with respect thereto, as set forth as Exhibit “B” attached hereto and made a part hereof by this reference, as the same may be modified or amended from time to time in accordance with the Existing Land Use Regulations. 1.13 Gross Floor Area/GFA. “Gross Floor Area” or “GFA” means the gross floor area of any buildings which are part of the Permitted Development. 1.14 Interim Development Fees. “Interim Development Fees” are the fees imposed within the Platinum Triangle pending adoption of permanent fee programs by the CITY as set forth in Paragraph 12.2 of this Development Agreement. 1.15 Mortgage. “Mortgage” means a mortgage, deed of trust or sale and leaseback arrangement or other transaction in which the Property, or a portion thereof or an interest therein, is pledged as security. 1.16 Mortgagee. “Mortgagee” means the holder of the beneficial interest under a Mortgage, or the owner of the Property, or interest therein, under a Mortgage. 1.17 Owner. “OWNER” is Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P., a Texas limited partnership, and any person or entity with which or into which Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. may merge, and any person or entity who may acquire substantially all of the assets of Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P., and any person or entity who receives any of the rights or obligations 10 under this Development Agreement in accordance with the provisions of Section 27 (Assignment) of this Development Agreement. 1.18 Parking Areas. The “Parking Areas” means all parking structure(s), and/or all surface parking servicing the Project. 1.19 Permitted Development. “Permitted Development” includes all buildings, uses, and the Parking Areas as identified in Section 6 of this Development Agreement and as further set forth in the Final Site Plans and the Development Approvals. This Development Agreement establishes maximum and minimum characteristics for all Permitted Development as set forth in the Final Site Plans. 1.20 Platinum Triangle. “Platinum Triangle” means that portion of the City of Anaheim generally bounded on the east by the Santa Ana River, on the south by the Anaheim city limits, on the west by the Santa Ana Freeway, and on the north by the Southern California Edison Easement. 1.21 Procedures Resolution. The “Procedures Resolution” is Resolution No. 82R-565 adopted by CITY pursuant to Section 65865 of the Development Agreement Statute. 1.22 Project. The “Project” means the development project contemplated by the Final Site Plans with respect to the Property, consisting of approximately 1,079 residential dwelling units, approximately, but not to exceed, 9,800 square feet of commercial uses, a new Public Park and other amenities and including but not limited to on-site and off-site improvements, as such development project is further defined, enhanced or modified pursuant to the provisions of this Development Agreement and the Development Approvals. 1.23 Property. The “Property” means that certain real property shown and described on Exhibit “A” to this Development Agreement. 1.24 Public Improvements. “Public Improvements” means the facilities, both on- and off-site, to be improved, constructed and dedicated by OWNER to (and, upon completion in accordance with this Development Agreement, accepted by) the CITY. Public Improvements include the public park, public streets within the Property, sidewalks, bio-swales and other Storm-water Management Improvements in the public right-of-way, all public utilities within the streets (such as gas, electricity, water, storm drains and sewer lines, but excluding any non-municipal utilities), bicycle lanes and paths in the public right of way, off-site intersection improvements (including but not limited to curbs, medians, signaling, traffic controls devices, signage, and striping), transit system improvements, and all other improvements delineated on street improvement plans approved by the City Engineer for the Project during the pendency of the Project. The Public Improvements do not include paseos, pedestrian paths within the Property, private streets and drives, parks and open spaces, and community or recreation facilities to be built on land owned and retained by OWNER. 1.25 Storm-water Management Improvements. “Storm-water Management Improvements” means the facilities, both those to remain privately-owned and those to be dedicated to the CITY, that comprise the infrastructure and landscape system that is intended to manage the storm-water runoff associated with the Project. Storm-water Management 11 Improvements include but are not limited to: (i) swales and bioswales (including plants and soils), (ii) bio-gutters and grates (including plants and soils), (iii) tree wells, (iv) ponds, wetlands, and constructed streams, (v) storm-water cisterns, (vi) permeable paving systems, (vii) storm- water culverts, (viii) trench drains and grates, (ix) storm-water piping, (x) storm-water collection system, and (xi) other facilities performing a storm-water control function. 1.26 Term. “Term” is defined in Section 2 of this Development Agreement. 1.27 Zoning Code. “Zoning Code” refers to Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Section 2. TERM. 2.1 The term (hereinafter called “Term”) of this Development Agreement shall be that period of time during which this Development Agreement shall be in effect and bind the parties hereto. The Term shall commence on the Development Agreement Date and shall extend for a period of five (5) years thereafter, terminating at the end of the day on the fifth anniversary of the Development Agreement Date, subject to the periodic review and modification or termination provisions defined in Section 25 and Section 27, respectively, of this Development Agreement, and further subject to three (3) automatic five (5) year extensions for completion of the Project in accordance with the Timing of Development schedule set forth in Section 15 of this Development Agreement, and the force majeure events referred to in Section 30.1. 2.2 This Development Agreement shall terminate and be of no force and effect upon the occurrence of the entry of a final judgment or issuance of a final order, after all appeals have been exhausted, directed to CITY as a result of any lawsuit filed against CITY to set aside, withdraw or abrogate the approval of the City Council of this Development Agreement or if termination occurs pursuant to the provisions of the Procedures Resolution and such termination is so intended thereby. 2.3 Following expiration of the Term, this Development Agreement shall be deemed terminated and of no further force and effect, except for any provisions which, by their express terms, survive the expiration or termination of this Development Agreement. 2.4 If not already terminated by reason of any other provision in this Development Agreement, or for any other reason, except as provided below, this Development Agreement shall automatically terminate and be of no further force and effect upon completion of the Project pursuant to the terms of this Development Agreement and any further amendments thereto and the issuance of all occupancy permits and acceptance by CITY of all dedications and improvements as required by the development of the Project. Section 3. BINDING COVENANTS. Pursuant to Section 65868 of the Development Agreement Statute, from and after recordation of this Development Agreement in the Official Records, all of the provisions, agreements, rights, powers, standards, terms, covenants and obligations contained in this Development Agreement shall be binding upon the Parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation, or otherwise) and assigns, and all persons or entities acquiring the Property, any lot, parcel or any portion thereof, or any interest therein, whether by sale, operation 12 of law, or in any manner whatsoever, and shall inure to the benefit of the Parties and their respective heirs, successors (by merger, consolidation or otherwise) and assigns. All provisions of this Development Agreement shall be enforceable during the Term hereof as equitable servitudes and shall constitute covenants and benefits running with the land pursuant to applicable law, including but not limited to California Civil Code Section 1468. Section 4. EFFECT OF AGREEMENT. As a material part of the consideration of this Development Agreement, unless otherwise provided herein, the parties agree that the Existing Land Use Regulations shall be applicable to development of the Project. In connection with all subsequent discretionary and non-discretionary actions by CITY required to implement the Final Site Plans and any discretionary actions and non-discretionary actions which CITY takes or has the right to take under this Development Agreement relating to the Project, including any review, approval, renewal, conditional approval or denial, CITY shall exercise its discretion or take action in a manner which complies and is consistent with the Development Approvals (including without limitation, the Final Site Plans), the Existing Land Use Regulations and such other standards, terms and conditions expressly contained in this Development Agreement. CITY shall accept and timely process, in the normal manner for processing such matters as may then be applicable, all applications for further approvals necessary or convenient to fully carryout the Project, including any necessary site plan, tentative map, vesting tentative map, final map and any grading, construction or other permits filed by OWNER in accordance with the Development Approvals. Section 5. PROJECT LAND USES. 5.1 The Property shall be used for such uses as may be permitted by the Development Approvals and the Existing Land Use Regulations. The Term, the density and intensity of use, developable GFA, footprint square footage, the maximum height and size of proposed buildings and structures, lot sizes, set back requirements, zoning, Public Improvements, and the provisions for reservation or dedication of land for public purposes shall be those set forth in the Development Approvals, the Existing Land Use Regulations and this Development Agreement pursuant to Section 65865.2 of the Development Agreement Statute. 5.2 Subject to any applicable notice and cure periods, and Section 30.1, the OWNER shall comply with all applicable conditions of the Existing Land Use Regulations and Development Approvals, and shall comply with all mitigation measures imposed upon the Project pursuant to CEQA. Section 6. PERMITTED DEVELOPMENT. 6.1 Description of Permitted Development. The Permitted Development shall be as set forth on the Final Site Plans. The Project shall be constructed substantially in conformance with the Final Site Plans or as otherwise permitted under the Development Approvals. 6.2 Parking Areas. The Parking Areas shall be constructed so that there will be sufficient parking spaces available within the PROPERTY to serve the Project, as depicted and substantially in conformance with the Final Site Plans and the minimum parking requirements 13 set forth in the Zoning Code. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, OWNER shall record a covenant against the Property in a form approved by the City Attorney’s Office that stating that the use of the Parking Areas shall be limited to tenants, visitors, patrons, invitees and other users of the Permitted Development. Said covenant shall also provide that the Parking Areas shall not be used to provide public parking for patrons of Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the Grove of Anaheim or any other off-site public or private facilities without a prior written agreement with the CITY setting forth CITY’s ability to seek reimbursement for the full cost associated with the use of any Police Department and/or Traffic Management Center staff that may be deemed necessary by CITY for traffic control purposes related to the use of Parking Areas for such public parking and subject to such other and further conditions as may be required by the CITY. Section 7. DENSITY OF PERMITTED BUILDINGS. The Permitted Development shall be as set forth in this Development Agreement, and shall not exceed the maximum heights and maximum footprints set forth on the Final Site Plans. Section 8. ENFORCEMENT. Unless this Development Agreement is terminated or cancelled pursuant to the provisions of this Development Agreement, this Development Agreement or any amendment hereto, shall be enforceable by any party hereto notwithstanding any change hereafter in any applicable general plan, specific plan, zoning ordinance, subdivision ordinance or building ordinance adopted by CITY which alters or amends the rules, regulations or policies of Development of the Project as provided in this Development Agreement pursuant to Section 65865.4 of the Development Agreement Statute; provided, however, that the limitations of this Section shall not apply to changes mandated by State or Federal laws or other permissible changes or new regulations as more particularly set forth in Section 23 of this Development Agreement. Section 9. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND SERVICES. 9.1 General. In addition to performing any other obligations heretofore imposed as conditions of approval, as set forth in Exhibit “C” hereto, as material consideration for the CITY’s entering into this Development Agreement, OWNER shall undertake the construction and installation of the following Public Improvements required to support the Project and to enhance area-wide traffic circulation and emergency police and fire protection service within the time periods as set forth below and in conformance with the Existing Land Use Regulations. CITY shall cooperate with OWNER for the purpose of coordinating all Public Improvements constructed under the Development Approvals or this Development Agreement to existing or newly constructed Public Improvements, whether located within or outside of the Property. OWNER shall be responsible for and use good faith efforts to acquire any right(s)-of-way necessary to construct the public facility improvements required by, or otherwise necessary to comply with the conditions of, this Development Agreement or any Development Approvals. Should it become necessary due to OWNER’s failure or inability to acquire said right(s)-of-way within four months after OWNER begins its efforts to so acquire said right(s)-of-way, CITY shall negotiate the purchase of the necessary right(s)-of-way to construct the Public Improvements as required by, or otherwise necessary to comply with the conditions of, this Development Agreement and, if necessary in accordance with the procedures established by State law, and the limitations hereinafter set forth in this Section, CITY may use its powers of eminent domain to condemn said required right(s)-of way. OWNER agrees to pay for all costs 14 associated with said acquisition and condemnation proceedings. If the CITY cannot make the proper findings or if for some other reason under the condemnation laws CITY is prevented from acquiring the necessary right(s)-of-way to enable OWNER to construct the Public Improvements required by, or otherwise necessary to comply with the conditions of, this Development Agreement, then the parties agree to amend this Development Agreement to modify OWNER’s obligations accordingly. Any such required modification shall involve the substitution of other considerations or obligations by OWNER (of similar value) as are negotiated in good faith between the parties hereto. Nothing contained in this Section shall be deemed to constitute a determination or resolution of necessity by CITY to initiate condemnation proceedings, it being expressly understood that the CITY has reserved its discretion to approve or disapprove a resolution of necessity (pursuant to Article 2 [commencing with Section 1245.210] of Chapter 4 of Title 7 of the California Code of Civil Procedure). Public Improvements that are required to be constructed as part of the Development Approvals shall be designed and constructed, and shall contain those improvements and facilities, as reasonably required by the applicable CITY Agency that is to accept, and in some cases operate and maintain, the Public Improvements in keeping with the then-current CITY- wide standards and requirements of the CITY Agency as if it were to design and construct the Public Improvement on its own at that time. In connection with all of the Public Improvements, OWNER shall engage a contractor that is duly licensed in California and qualified to complete the work (the “Contractor”). The Contractor shall contract directly with OWNER pursuant to an agreement to be entered into by OWNER and Contractor (the “Construction Contract”), which shall: (i) be a guaranteed maximum price contract; (ii) require the Contractor or OWNER to obtain and maintain bonds for one-hundred (100) percent of the cost of construction for performance and fifty (50) percent of payment for labor and materials (and include the CITY and OWNER as dual obligees under the bonds), or provide a letter of credit or other security satisfactory to CITY, in accordance with the requirements of the Subdivision Code; (iii) require the Contractor to obtain and maintain customary insurance, including workers compensation in statutory amounts, employer’s liability, general liability, builders all-risk; (iv) release the CITY from any and all claims relating to the construction, including but not limited to mechanics liens and stop notices; (v) subject to the rights of any Mortgagee that forecloses on the Property, include the CITY as a third party beneficiary, with all rights to rely on the work, receive the benefit of all warranties, and prospectively assume OWNER’s obligations and enforce the terms and conditions of the Construction Contract as if CITY were an original party thereto; and (vi) require that the CITY be included as a third party beneficiary, with all rights to rely on the work product, receive the benefit of all warranties and covenants, and prospectively assume Contractor’s rights in the event of any termination of the Construction Contract, relative to all work performed by the Project’s architect and engineer. 9.2 Public Park. If the Property is eight (8) or more acres with residential development totaling more than 325 dwelling units, OWNER shall be required to dedicate, improve and maintain a minimum size of 44 square feet for each residential unit for public park purposes. In full satisfaction of this requirement, OWNER shall develop, improve, complete and, thereafter, dedicate to CITY and maintain a public park as identified on Final Site Plan No. 2 (herein referred to as the “Public Park”). Owner will be entitled to a credit against the Park 15 Fees payable on the Project. Consistent with existing Code requirements and policies, no credit will be given for improvements. The required Public Park shall be completed not later than the issuance of the first final certificate of occupancy on the Property. 9.3 Utilities (Water, Electrical, Gas, Sewer, and Drainage). OWNER shall construct the Public Improvements necessary for the provision of requisite water, electrical, gas, sewer and drainage requirements for the Project as more fully set forth in the Development Approvals. OWNER shall construct and relocate utilities as may be required to provide services to the Permitted Development on the Property or that are displaced by the construction of the Permitted Development. As OWNER submits detailed construction plans in order to obtain building permits for the Permitted Development and/or the size and nature of the Project varies, the utilities that OWNER will construct or relocate may be revised accordingly by the CITY. 9.3.1 Water Service. OWNER will provide engineering studies to size the water mains for ultimate development within the Project. Said engineering studies will be conducted prior to rendering of water service or signature approval of the final water improvement plans, whichever occurs first. The studies shall be subject to the approval of the General Manager, Public Utilities Department or authorized designee. Alternatively, at OWNER’S election, the water system may be constructed incrementally, provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide municipal demands and fire flow protection for the proposed development phasing. OWNER will conform with Rule 15D of the Water Utility’s Rates, Rules and Regulations which provides for, in part, a fee based on GFA and the advancement of additional funds to construct the upgraded water facilities. OWNER shall be entitled to reimbursement in accordance with the terms of Rule l5D for the advancement of additional funds to construct the upgraded water facilities. 9.3.2 Sanitary Sewer and Storm Drains. Prior to final building and zoning inspections for the first building within the Permitted Development, OWNER will construct all sanitary sewers and storm drains and appurtenant structures (including treatment control BMP’s as required by the WQMP) to serve the ultimate development of the Property as provided by area- wide engineering studies to be conducted prior to issuance of any building permits for the first building within the Permitted Development and updated prior to the issuance of any building permits for each subsequent building within the Permitted Development. All studies shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. OWNER will construct improvements identified in said studies. The systems may be constructed incrementally subject to the approval of the City Engineer, provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide capacity for the proposed development phasing. 9.4 Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities. The timing, phasing and sequence of the construction of the Public Improvements shall be in accordance with the phasing and sequence set forth in the Infrastructure Phasing Plan attached hereto as Exhibit “H”. The Infrastructure Phasing Plan reflects the Parties’ mutual acknowledgement that the need for certain Public Improvements is related to the amount and location of new residential units and commercial GFA proposed for each Phase of the Project. Prior to recordation of the Final Parcel Map, OWNER shall be required to provide a detailed Infrastructure Phasing Plan satisfactory to the Planning Director, the Community Services Director, the Public Works Director and the Public Utilities General Manager with a detailed 16 phasing plan relating to phasing and sequence of the Public Improvements. CITY and OWNER may, but shall not be obligated to, mutually agree to revise the Infrastructure Phasing Plan, subject to the Planning Director’s approval and confirmation that the revised Infrastructure Phasing Plan is not anticipated to result in any new environmental impacts or infrastructure requirements. The Parties understand and agree that any Public Improvements identified in this Development Agreement may become part of a larger CITY system and that the proposed Public Improvements must be constructed so as to integrate and work with the existing CITY systems in every material respect. 9.5 Maintenance and Operation of Public Improvements by OWNER and Successors. The Parties agree that OWNER shall own and maintain in good and workmanlike condition, and otherwise in accordance with all applicable laws and any applicable permits, all Public Improvements until such time that CITY accepts dedication of such Public Improvements pursuant to Section 1.25 above; provided, however, that OWNER and its successors and assigns shall be responsible, at its sole cost and expense, for the ongoing maintenance and repair of the Public Park following its dedication to, and acceptance by, the CITY. The provisions of this Section 9.5 shall survive the expiration of this Development Agreement. In order to ensure that the Public Improvements not yet accepted by the CITY for maintenance are maintained in a clean, good and workmanlike condition, OWNER shall record in the Official Records of the County of Orange, at such time as the Planning Director with the advice of the City Attorney deems necessary and appropriate, a declaration of covenants, conditions, and restrictions (“CC&Rs”) imposing against each owner of a lot in the Project the obligation to maintain the Public Improvements. The CC&Rs shall include a requirement that a master owner’s association (“Master Owners’ Association”) provide all necessary and ongoing maintenance and repairs to the Public Improvements, at no cost to the CITY, with appropriate owners’ dues to provide for such maintenance prior to the time the Public Improvements have been accepted by the City. Any failure of the Master Owners’ Association to perform its obligations to provide all necessary and ongoing maintenance and repairs shall not be considered an event of Default or otherwise be held against the OWNER under this Development Agreement and the CITY’s remedy shall be its enforcement rights under the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs identified herein shall be subject to reasonable review and approval by the City Attorney, the City Engineer and the Planning Director and shall expressly provide the CITY with a third party right to enforce the maintenance and repair provisions of the CC&Rs. The CC&Rs shall also include a covenant stating that the use of the Parking Areas shall be limited to tenants, visitors, patrons, invitees and other users of the Permitted Development. Said covenant shall also provide that the Parking Areas shall not be used to provide public parking for patrons of Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the Grove of Anaheim or any other off- site public or private facilities without a prior written agreement between the Master Owners’ Association and CITY setting forth CITY’s ability to seek reimbursement for the full cost associated with the use of any Police Department and/or Traffic Management Center staff that may be deemed necessary by CITY for traffic control purposes relating to such public parking and subject to such other and further conditions as may be required by CITY. Until such time as the Master Owners’ Association is formed, the CC&Rs are recorded, and the Master Owners’ Association has assumed responsibility to maintain the Public Improvements, the OWNER shall be responsible to keep, service and maintain the Public 17 Improvements in good, clean and presentable appearance, condition and repair, free of debris, waste and graffiti, and in compliance with all applicable provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. CITY shall promptly accept dedication for Public Improvements upon OWNER’s completion of such Public Improvements in accordance with applicable City standards. 9.6 Traffic Circulation Improvements. In order to assist CITY in providing for area-wide traffic circulation as required by this Project, OWNER shall dedicate land as shown on the Final Site Plans, and cause to be made those certain traffic circulation improvements as set forth in Exhibit “G” attached hereto, including all applicable measures from the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330. 9.7 Permits to Enter CITY Property. Subject to the rights of any third party and the CITY’s reasonable agreement on the scope of the proposed work and insurance or security requirements applied to all similarly situated parties, and provided OWNER is not then in Default under this Development Agreement (excluding any cure periods), the CITY will grant permits to enter CITY-owned property on the CITY’s standard form permit and otherwise on commercially reasonable terms in order to permit OWNER or OWNER’s agents or designees to enter CITY-owned property as needed to perform investigatory work, construct Public Improvements, and complete Mitigation Measures and obligations of OWNER under this Development Agreement. Permits will include release, indemnification and security provisions in keeping with the CITY’s standard practices. Section 10. REIMBURSEMENT PROVISION. In the event OWNER is required to construct Public Improvements which are supplemental to the requirements of the Project for the benefit of other properties, CITY will work with OWNER to establish mechanisms for proportional reimbursement from owners of the benefited properties. All costs associated with establishing said mechanisms shall be paid by OWNER. Section 11. DEDICATIONS AND EXACTIONS. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for the Project, OWNER shall irrevocably offer for dedication the rights-of-way, including the public connector streets, collector streets and any other streets required by the Development Approvals, if applicable, and other areas as more fully set forth in the Final Site Plans for the uses set forth in the Final Site Plans. These dedications shall be in fee or as an easement at the discretion of CITY, and upon completion and acceptance by CITY of the associated improvements in compliance with the specifications as approved by CITY, CITY shall accept OWNER’s offer of dedication. Nothing contained in this Development Agreement, however, shall be deemed to preclude CITY from exercising the power of eminent domain with respect to the Property or the Project, or any part thereof. Prior to approval of water improvement plans for the Project, OWNER shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the CITY (i) an easement (or easements) for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5) foot wide easement around each fire hydrant and/or water meter pad, and (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and 18 service laterals, all to the satisfaction of the CITY’s Water Engineering Division. The dimensions and locations of said easements shall be subject to approval by the CITY’s Water Engineering Division. OWNER shall execute and deliver easement deeds to the CITY using the CITY’s standard form and at such time as determined necessary by the CITY’s Water Engineering Division; provided, however, that OWNER shall not be required to grant any easement that would unreasonably interfere with the construction and maintenance of the Project as set forth on the Site Plans. The easement deeds shall include language that requires OWNER to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of CITY-owned water facilities during the duration of the easements. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of OWNER, which obligation shall be expressly included and recorded in the “CC&Rs” (as defined in Section 9.5) for the Project. Section 12. FEES, TAXES, AND ASSESSMENTS. 12.1 Fees, Taxes and Assessments. OWNER shall be responsible for the payment of fees in the amount and at the times set forth in the Existing Land Use Regulations, as said amounts and timing may be modified in accordance with this Development Agreement. 12.2 Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees. CITY anticipates that a number of fees will be adopted to pay the costs attributable to new development in the Platinum Triangle. The Interim Development Fees constitute amounts estimated by the applicable CITY Agencies to be the approximate fair share of costs attributable to the Project. Except as otherwise authorized by Chapter 17.38 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, if an identified Interim Development Fee has been adopted prior to the time that OWNER applies for issuance of a building permit, the OWNER shall pay the fee. Except as otherwise authorized by Chapter 17.38 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, if an identified Interim Development Fee has not been adopted prior to the issuance of a building permit, the OWNER shall pay the applicable Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fees set forth in attached Exhibit “D” at the time OWNER applies for a building permit or approval in connection with the Project. If the OWNER has paid a Platinum Triangle Interim Development Fee, and, upon subsequent adoption of a corresponding fee it is determined that the OWNER has paid an amount greater than the amount payable pursuant to the adopted fee, the excess amount paid as an Interim Development Fee shall be refunded to the OWNER. CITY shall not be obligated to adopt any of the identified Interim Development Fees. If any such identified fee is not adopted, the parties agree that the Interim Development Fee is adequate to address the impacts of the Project and will fully satisfy OWNER’s fee obligation for that particular fee. 12.2.1 Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee. OWNER will pay an Electrical Utilities Undergrounding Fee as set forth in Exhibit “D-1.” 12.2.2 General Plan and Environmental Processing Fee. OWNER will pay a processing Fee attributable to the cost of creating and establishing the Master Land Use Plan and the PTMU Overlay Zone for the Platinum Triangle, as well as the costs of associated environmental documentation, as said additional costs are set forth in Exhibit “D-2.” 19 12.2.3 Library Facilities Fee. OWNER will pay a Library Facilities Fee as set forth in Exhibit “D-3.” 12.3 Excluded Development Fees. Fees Excluded from Existing Land Use Regulations. The following fees shall not be included among the fees which would otherwise fall within the definition of Existing Land Use Regulations: 12.3.1 Water Utilities Fees. OWNER will pay all applicable fees in accordance with the Water Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations in effect at the time of application for service including Rule 15D which provides for, in part, a fee based on GFA to construct the necessary water facility improvements within the Platinum Triangle. 12.3.2 Electrical Utilities Fees.OWNER will pay all fees in accordance with the Electrical Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations in effect at the time of application for service. 12.3.3 CITY Processing Fees. OWNER shall pay all standard City-wide processing fees for building permits, zoning review, and other similar fees associated with the Development of the Project which are in existence at the time of approval of this Development Agreement at the rate in existence at the time said fees are normally required to be paid to CITY. 12.4 Platinum Triangle Infrastructure and/or Maintenance Assessment District. Prior to the date a building or grading permit is issued relating to implementation of the Final Site Plan for Phase 1 of the Project, or within a period of ninety (90) days from the date of execution of this Development Agreement, whichever occurs first, OWNER shall execute and record an unsubordinated covenant in a form approved by the City Attorney’s Office wherein OWNER agrees not to contest the formation of any assessment district(s) which may be formed to finance Platinum Triangle infrastructure and/or maintenance, which district(s) could include the Property. The covenant shall not preclude OWNER from contesting (i) the determination of benefit of such improvements to the Property, (ii) the properties included in said district or area, (iii) the manner in which said fee is determined, or (iv) the manner in which said improvement costs are spread. 12.5 Accounting of Funds. CITY will comply with applicable requirements of Government Code Section 65865 relating to accounting of funds. 12.6 Imposition of Increased Fees, Taxes or Assessments. Except as expressly set forth or reserved in this Development Agreement, CITY shall not, without the prior written consent of OWNER, impose any additional fee, tax or assessment on the Project or any portion thereof as a condition to the implementation of the Project or any portion thereof, except such fees, taxes and assessments as are explicitly set forth in this Development Agreement, including the Existing Land Use Regulations and the Development Approvals. The rates of such fees, taxes and assessments shall be the rates in existence at the time said fees, taxes and assessments are normally required to be paid to CITY. Nothing contained herein shall be construed to prohibit CITY from imposing fees, taxes or assessments on the Property which are unrelated to the approval or implementation of the Project. 20 Section 13. COVENANTS, CONDITIONS AND RESTRICTIONS. In consideration for CITY entering into this Development Agreement and other consideration set forth in this Development Agreement, OWNER agrees to record unsubordinated covenants, conditions and restrictions (“CC&Rs”) applicable to the Property in a form and content satisfactory to the Planning Director, City Engineer and the City Attorney incorporating the requirements and obligations set forth in Exhibit “E” to this Development Agreement, entitled the “Development Requirements and Maintenance Obligations.” Section 14. NEXUS/REASONABLE RELATIONSHIP CHALLENGES. OWNER consents to, and waives any right it may have now or in the future to challenge the legal validity of the conditions, requirements, policies or programs required by Existing Land Use Regulations or this Development Agreement including, without limitation, any claim that they constitute an abuse of the police power, violate substantive due process, deny equal protection of the laws, effect a taking of property without payment of just compensation, or impose an unlawful tax. Section 15. TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT. Timing of Development shall be as set forth in the Final Site Plans. The term of this Development Agreement shall be automatically extended for five (5) years if OWNER has commenced construction of Phase 1 of the Project as set forth in the Final Site Plans prior to the expiration of this Development Agreement. The term of this Development Agreement shall be automatically extended for an additional five (5) years if OWNER has commenced construction of Phase 2 of the Project as set forth in the Final Site Plans prior to the expiration of the first extension of the term of this Development Agreement. The term of this Development Agreement shall be automatically extended for a final five (5) year extension if OWNER has commenced construction of Phase 3 of the Project as set forth in the Final Site Plans prior to the expiration of the second extension of the term of this Development Agreement. OWNER shall submit proof of compliance with the construction milestones described above prior to the expiration of each period set forth herein. The Planning Director shall determine if the project milestones have been met, and will inform the City Council of the extension of the Development Agreement. Upon the commencement of any work in any phase of the Project, OWNER shall continue the work at a commercially reasonable pace in light of market conditions to completion of that phase in accordance with applicable permits and requirements under this Development Agreement to ensure there are no material gaps between the start and completion of all work within that phase, subject to force majeure. Section 16. EXISTING USES. CITY and OWNER agree that those existing legally established uses on the Property may be retained until the Project is implemented. When those existing uses are demolished, no credit for any such demolished square footage for which Interim Development Fees have not been paid will be given OWNER against Interim Development Fees due on a square footage basis as 21 provided for in this Development Agreement. OWNER will pay the full Interim Development Fees for Permitted Development constructed pursuant to the Final Site Plans. Section 17. FUTURE APPROVALS. 17.1 Basis for Denying or Conditionally Granting Future Approvals. Before OWNER can begin grading on the Property or other development of the Property, OWNER must secure several additional permits and/or approvals from CITY. The parties agree that, to the extent said Development Approvals are ministerial in nature, CITY shall not, through the enactment or enforcement of any subsequent ordinances, rules, regulations, initiatives, policies, requirements, guidelines, or other constraints, withhold such approvals as a means of blocking construction or of imposing conditions on the Project which were not imposed during an earlier approval period unless CITY has been ordered to do so by a court of competent jurisdiction. Notwithstanding the previous sentence, CITY and OWNER will use their best efforts to ensure each other that all applications for and approvals of grading permits, building permits or other developmental approvals necessary for OWNER to develop the Project in accordance with the Final Site Plans are sought and processed in a timely manner. 17.2 Standard of Review. The rules, regulations and policies that apply to any additional Development Approvals which OWNER must secure prior to the Development of the Property shall be the Existing Land Use Regulations, as defined in this Development Agreement. 17.3 Future Amendments to Final Site Plans. Future amendments to all or a portion of the Final Site Plans which increase the intensity or density of the development of the Property, or change the permitted uses of the Property, and are not among those described in Section 18.4 of this Development Agreement, may subject the portion or portions of the Project being amended or affected by the amendment to a change in the CITY’s General Plan, zoning designations and rules applicable to the Property and further environmental review and possible mitigation of adverse impacts under CEQA in effect at the time of such amendment. Any such amendment to the Final Site Plans shall be processed concurrently with the processing of an amendment to this Development Agreement. It is the desire and intent of both parties, except as set forth herein, that any future amendment of the Final Site Plans will not alter, affect, impair or otherwise impact the rights, duties and obligations of the parties under this Development Agreement with respect to the un-amended portions of the Final Site Plans. Section 18. AMENDMENT. 18.1 Initiation of Amendment. Either party may propose an amendment to this Development Agreement. 18.2 Procedure. Except as set forth in Section 18.4 below, the procedure for proposing and adopting an amendment to this Development Agreement shall be the same as the procedure required for entering into this Development Agreement in the first instance. Such procedures are set forth in Sections 2, 3 and 5 of the Procedures Resolution. 18.3 Consent. Except as provided elsewhere within this Development Agreement, any amendment to this Development Agreement shall require the consent of both parties. No 22 amendment of this Development Agreement or any provision hereof shall be effective unless set forth in writing and signed by duly authorized representatives of each party hereto. 18.4 Amendments. Subject to the foregoing provisions of this Section, the parties acknowledge that refinements and further development of the Project may demonstrate that changes are appropriate with respect to the details and performance of the parties under this Development Agreement. The parties desire to retain a certain degree of flexibility with respect to the details of the Development of the Project and with respect to those items covered in general terms under this Development Agreement. Unless otherwise required by law, as determined in CITY’s reasonable discretion, a change or adjustment shall not require an amendment to this Agreement provided such change does not: (a) Alter the permitted uses of the Property in part or in whole; or (b) Increase the density or intensity of use of the Property as a whole; or (c) Increase the maximum height and size of permitted buildings; or (d) Delete or modify a requirement for the reservation or dedication of land for public purpose within the Property as a whole; or (e) Delete or modify a requirement for the provision of any public benefit identified herein; or (f) Constitute a “project” requiring a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report pursuant to Section 21166 of the Public Resources Code. 18.5 Effect of Amendment to Development Agreement. If and when the parties find that changes or adjustments, except for those changes enumerated in the immediately preceding Section, are necessary or appropriate to further the intended purposes of this Development Agreement, they may, unless otherwise required by law, effectuate such changes or adjustments as specified in the Development Approvals by written agreement executed by OWNER and the City Manager and approved as to form by the City Attorney. The parties agree that except as expressly set forth in any such amendment, an amendment to this Development Agreement will not alter, affect, impair, modify, waive or otherwise impact any other rights, duties or obligations of either party under this Development Agreement. Section 19. NON-CANCELLATION OF RIGHTS. Subject to defeasance pursuant to Sections 25, 26 or 27 of this Development Agreement, the Final Site Plans and other Development Approvals as provided for in this Development Agreement shall be final and the rights once granted thereby shall be vested in the Property upon recordation of this Development Agreement. 23 Section 20. BENEFITS TO CITY. The direct and indirect benefits CITY (including, without limitation, the existing and future anticipated residents of CITY) expects to receive pursuant to this Development Agreement include, but are not limited to, the following: a. The participation of OWNER in the accelerated, coordinated and more economic construction, funding and dedication to the public, as provided in this Development Agreement, of certain of the vitally needed on-site and area-wide Public Improvements and facilities, and assurances that the entire Project will be developed as set forth in the Final Site Plans and this Development Agreement in order to encourage development of the Platinum Triangle; and b. The considerations set forth in Section 9 of this Development Agreement. Section 21. BENEFITS TO OWNER. OWNER has expended and will continue to expend large amounts of time and money on the planning and infrastructure construction for the Project. OWNER asserts that OWNER would not make any additional expenditures, or the advanced expenditures required by this Development Agreement, without this Development Agreement and that any additional expenditures which OWNER makes after the Development Agreement Date will be made in reliance upon this Development Agreement. Without limiting the generality of the foregoing, this Development Agreement provides for the completion of Public Improvements and facilities prior to the time when they would be justified economically in connection with the phasing of the Project, and of a size which would be justified only by the magnitude of the Project provided for by the Final Site Plans and this Development Agreement. The benefit to OWNER under this Development Agreement consists of the assurance that OWNER will preserve the right to develop the Property as planned and as set forth in the Final Site Plans and this Development Agreement. The parties acknowledge that the public benefits to be provided by OWNER to CITY pursuant to this Development Agreement are in consideration for and reliance upon assurances that the Property can be developed in accordance with the Final Site Plans and this Development Agreement. Section 22. UNDERTAKINGS AND ASSURANCES CONTEMPLATED AND PROMOTED BY DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT STATUTE. The mutual undertakings and assurances described above and provided for in this Development Agreement are for the benefit of CITY and OWNER and promote the comprehensive planning, private and public cooperation and participation in the provision of public facilities, and the effective and efficient development of infrastructure and facilities supporting development which was contemplated and promoted by the Development Agreement Statute. CITY agrees that it will not take any actions which are intended to circumvent this Development Agreement; provided, however, that any action of the electorate shall not be deemed an action for purposes of this section. 24 Section 23. RESERVED AUTHORITY. 23.1 State and Federal Laws and Regulations. In the event that the State or Federal laws or regulations enacted after this Development Agreement has been entered into, prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of the Development Agreement, such provisions of the Development Agreement shall be modified or suspended as may be necessary to comply with such State or Federal laws or regulations, provided, however, that this Development Agreement shall remain in full force and effect to the extent it is not inconsistent with such laws or regulations and to the extent such laws or regulations do not render such remaining provisions impractical to enforce. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY shall not adopt or undertake any rule, regulation or policy which is inconsistent with this Development Agreement until CITY makes a finding that such rule, regulation or policy is reasonably necessary to comply with such State and Federal laws or regulations. 23.2 Model Codes. When considering applications for approval of plans, CITY shall apply the provisions, requirements, rules and/or regulations then in effect that are contained in the Building Standards Codes, as adopted in Title 15, Chapter 15.03 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and the California Fire Code, as adopted in Title 16, Chapter 16.08 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, as the same may be amended from time to time by the CITY. 23.3 Public Health and Safety. This Development Agreement shall not prevent CITY from adopting new rules, regulations and policies, including amendments or modifications to model codes described in Section 23.2 of this Development Agreement which directly result from findings by CITY that failure to adopt such rules, regulations or policies would result in a condition injurious or detrimental to the public health and safety. Notwithstanding the foregoing, CITY shall not adopt any such rules, regulations or policies which prevent or preclude compliance with one or more provisions of this Development Agreement until CITY makes a finding, supported by substantial evidence in the record, that such rules, regulations or policies are actually necessary to correct or avoid such imminent injurious or detrimental condition, and such rules, regulations or policies are applied in a uniform, equitable and proportional manner with all properties, public and private, throughout the CITY which are impacted by the imminent injurious or detrimental condition. Section 24. CANCELLATION. 24.1 Initiation of Cancellation. Either party may propose cancellation of this Development Agreement. 24.2 Procedure. The procedure for proposing a cancellation of and canceling this Development Agreement shall be the same as the procedure required for entering into this Development Agreement in the first instance. Such procedures are set forth in Sections 2, 3 and 5 of the Procedures Resolution and Section 65868 of the Government Code. 24.3 Consent of OWNER and CITY. Any cancellation of this Development Agreement shall require the mutual consent of OWNER and CITY. 25 Section 25. PERIODIC REVIEW. 25.1 Time for Review. CITY shall, at least every twelve (12) months after the Development Agreement Date, review the extent of good faith compliance by OWNER with the terms of this Development Agreement. OWNER’s failure to comply with the timing schedules set forth in the Final Site Plans shall constitute rebuttable evidence of OWNER’s lack of good faith compliance with this Development Agreement. Such periodic review shall determine compliance with the terms of this Development Agreement pursuant to California Government Code Section 65865.1 and other successor laws and regulations. 25.2 Owner’s Submission. Each year, not less than forty-five (45) days nor more than sixty (60) days prior to the anniversary of the Development Agreement Date, OWNER shall submit evidence to the City Council of its good faith compliance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement. OWNER shall notify the City Council in writing that such evidence is being submitted to CITY pursuant to the requirements of Section 6.2 of the Procedures Resolution. OWNER shall pay to CITY a reasonable processing fee in an amount as CITY may reasonably establish from time to time on each occasion that OWNER submits its evidence for a periodic review. The burden of proof of compliance is upon OWNER by substantial evidence. 25.3 Findings. Within forty-five (45) days after the submission of OWNER’s evidence, the City Council shall review the information submitted by OWNER and all other available evidence regarding OWNER’s compliance with this Development Agreement and shall determine, on the basis of substantial evidence, whether or not OWNER has, for the period under review, complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement. If the City Council finds that OWNER has so complied, the review for that period shall be deemed concluded and OWNER shall be deemed to be in compliance. The Planning Director shall notify OWNER in writing whether OWNER has complied with the terms of this Development Agreement. If the City Council finds and determines, on the basis of substantial evidence, that OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement for the period under review, the Planning Director shall notify OWNER in writing and OWNER shall be given sixty (60) days to cure such non-compliance and if OWNER diligently and continuously pursues curing such non-compliance and the actions required to cure such non-compliance take more than sixty (60) days, then OWNER shall be entitled to cure, correct or remedy such non-compliance within such additional time as is reasonably necessary, but in no event more than one hundred twenty (120) days. If during the cure period, OWNER fails to cure such noncompliance or is not making reasonable good faith progress towards such end, then the City Council may, at its discretion, proceed to modify or terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for compliance in accordance with the procedures set forth in Section 27 of this Development Agreement. If such non-compliance is not cured within the applicable period provided above, it shall thereafter constitute a “Default”. The CITY’s failure to timely complete the annual review is not deemed to be a waiver of the right to do so at a later date. 25.4 Initiation of Review by City Council. In addition to the periodic review set forth in this Development Agreement, the City Council may at any time initiate a review of this Development Agreement upon the giving of written notice thereof to OWNER. Within thirty 26 (30) days following receipt of such notice, OWNER shall submit evidence to the City Council of OWNER’s good faith compliance with this Development Agreement and such review and determination shall proceed in the manner as otherwise provided in this Development Agreement. Section 26. EVENTS OF DEFAULT. 26.1 Default by OWNER. 26.1.1 Default. In the event the CITY reasonably determines that OWNER has failed to perform any of its obligations under this Development Agreement, or that any such obligations are not performed in a timely manner, the CITY may pursue only those remedies expressly provided for in this Development Agreement; provided, however, that the CITY’s right to compel specific performance of the obligations of OWNER under this Development Agreement shall be subject to the limitations set forth in Section 26.1.4. Further, the CITY shall have no right to monetary damages except as set forth in Section 26.2.2. 26.1.2 Notice of Default. In the event the CITY reasonably determines that OWNER is in default of any of its obligations under this Development Agreement, the CITY shall send a notice of such alleged default(s) to OWNER in which the allegations of default shall be set forth in sufficient detail to enable OWNER to ascertain the specific actions necessary to cure the alleged default(s). Upon receipt of a notice of default, OWNER shall promptly commence to cure the identified default(s) at the earliest reasonable time after receipt of such notice but in no event more than thirty (30) days after receipt of notice and shall complete the cure of (i) any monetary default(s) not later than thirty (30) days after the receipt of such notice of default, and (ii) any non-monetary default(s) not later than ninety (90) days after the receipt of such notice of default or such longer period as necessary to cure default as agreed to by CITY in its sole discretion. The Parties may mutually agree in writing to extend the time periods set forth in this Section. 26.1.3 Termination for Failure to Cure Default. If after the cure period provided for in Section 26.1.2 has lapsed and the Planning Director reasonably finds and determines that OWNER remains in default, the Planning Director shall make a report to the City Council concerning such default and the City Council may thereafter proceed to modify or terminate this Development Agreement in accordance with the Procedures set forth in Sections 7.2 and 7.3 of the Procedures Resolution. 26.1.4 Specific Performance. Except as provided in this Section 26.1.4, the CITY shall have no right under this Development Agreement to seek a remedy of specific performance with respect to the Project in the event of an abandonment of the Project. The CITY’s right to seek specific performance to compel completion of the Project (including portions of the Project) in the event of such abandonment shall be specifically limited to (i) compelling OWNER, at the election of the CITY in its sole discretion, to complete or demolish any uncompleted Public Improvements initiated in connection with the Project with the choice of whether to demolish or complete such Public Improvements and the method of such demolition or completion of such improvements to be selected by the CITY in its sole discretion, and (ii) compelling OWNER, at the election of the CITY in its sole discretion, to complete or make safe and secure any 27 uncompleted improvements located on the Property with the choice of whether to demolish, complete or secure such improvements and the method of such demolition, completion and securing of such improvements to be selected by OWNER in its sole discretion. The CITY’s specific performance remedy shall include the right to require dedication to the CITY of the Public Improvements located on public property upon completion together with conveyance of real property as contemplated by this Development Agreement. Nothing in this Section 26.1.4 shall limit the CITY’s enforcement of all applicable provisions of the Existing Land Use Regulations, Development Approvals, mitigation measures, and Uniform Code for any portion of the Project then or thereafter constructed (e.g., requiring OWNER to build sewer laterals required under Existing Land Use Regulations to serve the Project actually completed), termination of this Development Agreement in accordance with the provisions hereof notwithstanding. In addition, nothing in this Section shall limit or restrict in any way the CITY’s monetary remedies as provided for in Section 26.2.2 hereof. 26.2 Default by CITY. 26.2.1 Notice of Default. In the event the OWNER reasonably determines that the CITY is in default of any of its obligations under this Development Agreement, the OWNER shall send a notice of such alleged default(s) to the CITY in which the allegations of default shall be set forth in sufficient detail to enable the CITY to ascertain the specific actions necessary to cure the alleged default(s). Upon receipt of written notice of default from OWNER, the CITY shall promptly commence to cure the identified default(s) at the earliest reasonable time after receipt of the notice of default and shall complete the cure of such default(s) not later than sixty (60) days after receipt of the notice of default or such longer period as necessary to cure default as agreed to by the OWNER in its sole discretion. The Parties may mutually agree in writing to extend the time periods set forth in this Section. 26.2.2 Specific Performance and Mandamus. It is acknowledged by the Parties that the CITY would not have entered into this Development Agreement if it were to be liable in damages under or with respect to this Development Agreement or the application thereof. In addition, the Parties agree that monetary damages are not an adequate remedy for OWNER if the CITY should be determined to be in default under this Development Agreement. The Parties further agree that specific performance and mandamus shall be OWNER’s only remedies under this Development Agreement and OWNER may not seek monetary damages in the event of a default by the CITY under this Development Agreement. OWNER covenants not to sue for or claim any monetary damages in the event of a default by the CITY under this Development Agreement (including without limitation special, incidental or consequential damages) and expressly waives its right to recover damages under this Development Agreement. Notwithstanding anything to the contrary contained herein, OWNER shall have the right to recover attorneys’ fees and costs when awarded by an arbitrator or a court with jurisdiction. The CITY shall have the right to recover (1) actual damages only (and not consequential, punitive or special damages, each of which is hereby expressly waived) for (a) the OWNER’s failure to pay sums to the CITY as and when due under this Development Agreement, but subject to any express conditions for such payment set forth in this Development Agreement, and (b) the OWNER’s failure to make payment due under any indemnity in this Development Agreement, (2) any and all damages relating to the OWNER’s failure to construct Public Improvements in accordance with CITY-approved plans and specifications and in accordance with all applicable 28 laws, and (3) attorney’s fees and costs when awarded by an arbitrator or a court with jurisdiction. For purposes of the foregoing, “actual damages” shall mean the actual amount of the sum due and owing under this Development Agreement, with interest as provided by law, together with such judgment collection activities as may be ordered by the judgment and no additional sums. OWNER may seek specific performance of CITY’s obligations under this Development Agreement or a writ of mandate pursuant to Code of Civil Procedure sections 1085 or 1094.5, as applicable, to compel the CITY to take or refrain from taking any action, or to modify any action taken, that is necessary to effectuate the terms of this Development Agreement only after serving written notice of the alleged default(s) on CITY and lapse of the period given for CITY to cure such default(s), all in accordance with Section 26.2.1, and for so long as CITY remains in default of its obligations under this Development Agreement. Section 27. MODIFICATION OR TERMINATION. If pursuant to Section 27.1 of this Development Agreement, CITY elects to modify or terminate this Development Agreement or establish a revised time schedule for compliance as herein provided, then CITY shall proceed as set forth in this Section. 27.1 Notice to Owner. CITY shall give notice to OWNER of City Council’s intention to proceed to modify or terminate this Development Agreement or establish a time schedule for compliance within ten (10) days of making the CITY’s findings. 27.2 Public Hearing. The City Council shall set and give notice of a public hearing on modification, termination or a time schedule for compliance to be held within forty-days after the City Council gives notice to OWNER. 27.3 Decision. The City Council shall announce its findings and decisions on whether this Development Agreement is to be terminated, how this Development Agreement is to be modified or the provisions of the Development Agreement with which OWNER must comply and a time schedule therefor not more than ten (10) days following completion of the public hearing. 27.4 Standard of Review. Any determination by CITY to terminate this Development Agreement because OWNER has not complied in good faith with the terms of this Development Agreement must be based upon a finding by the City Council, based on the preponderance of evidence, that OWNER is in default and has not cured that default in the timeframe permitted by Sections 25 and 26 above, as applicable. 27.5 Implementation. Amending or terminating this Development Agreement shall be accomplished by CITY enacting an ordinance. The ordinance shall recite the reasons which, in the opinion of the CITY, make the amendment or termination of this Development Agreement necessary. Not later than ten (10) days following the adoption of the ordinance, one copy thereof shall be forwarded to OWNER. This Development Agreement shall be terminated or this Development Agreement as modified shall become effective on the effective date of the ordinance terminating or modifying this Development Agreement. 27.6 Schedule for Compliance. Setting a reasonable time schedule for compliance with this Development Agreement may be accomplished by CITY enacting a resolution. The 29 resolution shall recite the reasons which, in the opinion of CITY, make it advisable to set a schedule for compliance and why the time schedule is reasonable. Not later than ten (10) days following adoption of the resolution, one copy thereof shall be forwarded to OWNER. Compliance with any time schedule so established as an alternative to amendment or termination shall be subject to periodic review as provided in this Development Agreement and lack of good faith compliance by OWNER with the time schedule shall be basis for termination or modification of this Development Agreement. Section 28. ASSIGNMENT. 28.1 Right to Assign. OWNER shall have the right to sell, mortgage, hypothecate, assign or transfer this Development Agreement, and any and all of its rights, duties and obligations hereunder, to any person, partnership, joint venture, firm or corporation at any time during the term of this Development Agreement, provided that any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer must be pursuant to a sale, assignment or other transfer of the interest of OWNER in the Property, or a portion thereof. In the event of any such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer, (a) OWNER shall notify CITY of such event and the name of the transferee, together with the corresponding entitlements being transferred to such transferee and (b) the agreement between OWNER and such transferee shall provide that either OWNER or the transferee or both shall be liable for the performance of all obligations of OWNER pursuant to this Development Agreement and the Development Approvals. Such transferee and/or OWNER shall notify CITY in writing which entity shall be liable for the performance of such obligations, and upon the express written assumption of any or all of the obligations of OWNER under this Development Agreement by such assignee, transferee or purchaser shall, without any act of or concurrence by CITY, relieve OWNER of its legal duty to perform said obligations under this Development Agreement with respect to the Property or portion thereof, so transferred, except to the extent OWNER is in default under the terms of this Development Agreement. 28.2 Release Upon Transfer. It is understood and agreed by the parties that the Property may be subdivided following the Development Agreement Date. One or more of such subdivided parcels may be sold, mortgaged, hypothecated, assigned or transferred to persons for development by them in accordance with the provisions of this Development Agreement. Effective upon such sale, mortgage, hypothecation, assignment or transfer, the obligations of OWNER shall become several and not joint, except as to OWNER’s obligations set forth in Section 9 of this Development Agreement. Upon the sale, transfer, or assignment of OWNER’s rights and interests under this Development Agreement as permitted pursuant to the Section 28.1 above, OWNER shall be released from its obligations under this Development Agreement with respect to the Property, or portion thereof so transferred, provided that (a) OWNER is not then in default under this Development Agreement, (b) OWNER has provided to CITY the notice of such transfer specified in Section 28.1 above, (c) the transferee executes and delivers to CITY a written agreement in which (i) the name and address of the transferee is set forth and (ii) the transferee expressly and unconditionally assumes all the obligations of OWNER under this Development Agreement and the Development Approvals with respect to the property, or portion thereof, so transferred and (d) the transferee provides CITY with security equivalent to any security provided by OWNER to secure performance of its obligations under this Development Agreement or the Development Approvals. Non-compliance by any such 30 transferee with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement shall not be deemed a default hereunder or grounds for termination hereof or constitute cause for CITY to initiate enforcement action against other persons then owning or holding interest in the Property or any portion thereof and not themselves in default hereunder. Upon completion of any phase of development of the Project as determined by CITY, CITY may release that completed phase from any further obligations under this Development Agreement. The provisions of this Section shall be self-executing and shall not require the execution or recordation of any further document or instrument. Any and all successors, assigns and transferees of OWNER shall have all of the same rights, benefits and obligations of OWNER as used in this Development Agreement and the term “OWNER” as used in this Development Agreement shall refer to any such successors, assigns and transferees unless expressly provided herein to the contrary. Section 29. NO CONFLICTING ENACTMENTS. By entering into this Development Agreement and relying thereupon, OWNER is obtaining vested rights to proceed with the Project in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Development Agreement, and in accordance with, and to the extent of, the Development Approvals. OWNER agrees that all improvements it constructs on the Property shall be done in accordance with this Development Agreement, the Development Approvals, the Existing Land Use Regulations, and in accordance with all applicable laws. By entering into this Development Agreement and relying thereupon, CITY is securing certain public benefits which enhance the public health, safety and general welfare. CITY therefore agrees that except as provided in Section 23 of this Development Agreement, neither the City Council nor any CITY Agency shall enact a rule, regulation, ordinance or other measure which does any one or more of the following: (1) relates to the rate, timing or sequencing of the Development or construction of all or any part of the Project and which is inconsistent or in conflict with this Development Agreement; (2) limits, reduces or otherwise modifies the density or intensity of all or any part of the Project, or otherwise requires (whether explicitly or by practical effect) any reduction or increase in square footage, or total number of or configuration of buildings, dedications, residential units or other improvements; (3) limits the phasing or increases the timing for completion of the Project in any manner inconsistent with this Development Agreement. No such rule, regulation, ordinance or other measure described in the immediately preceding sentence, whether enacted by the CITY, any CITY Agency, or the electorate, shall be of any force or effect as applied to the Project contemplated by this Development Agreement. Section 30. GENERAL. 30.1 Force Majeure. The Term of this Development Agreement and the time within which OWNER shall be required to perform any act under this Development Agreement shall be extended by a period of time equal to the number of days during which performance of such act is delayed unavoidably by strikes, lock-outs, acts of God, failure or inability to secure materials or labor by reason of priority or similar regulations or order of any governmental or regulatory body, initiative or referenda, moratoria, enemy action, civil disturbances, fire, unavoidable casualties, Third Party Challenge, or any other cause beyond the reasonable control of OWNER (financial inability excepted). This Section shall not be applicable to, bankruptcy or receivership initiated by or on behalf of OWNER or, if not dismissed within ninety (90) days, by any third parties against OWNER. A Party wishing to invoke this Section shall notify in writing the other 31 Party to this Development Agreement of that intention within thirty (30) days of the commencement of any such cause for delay and shall, at that time, specify the reasons therefor, the provisions of this Development Agreement that will be delayed as a result, and the period of such extension, if known, or, if not known, the Party’s best estimate thereof. The failure to so notify the other Party within that period as to the cause for delay shall constitute a waiver of any right to later rely upon this Section with respect to that cause. In the event any such extension continues for more than one hundred eighty (180) days, any Party not then in Default of its obligations hereunder, shall be entitled to terminate this Development Agreement upon written notice to the other and, in that event, the Parties shall have no further obligations hereunder. 30.2 Construction of Development Agreement. The language in all parts of this Development Agreement shall in all cases, be construed as a whole and in accordance with its fair meaning. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Development Agreement are for convenience only and shall not be considered or referred to in resolving questions of constructions. This Development Agreement shall be governed by the laws of the State of California. The parties understand and agree that this Development Agreement is not intended to constitute, nor shall be construed to constitute, an impermissible attempt to contract away the legislative and governmental functions of CITY, and in particular, the CITY’s police powers. In this regard, the parties understand and agree that this Development Agreement shall not be deemed to constitute the surrender or abnegation of the CITY’s governmental powers over the Property. 30.3 Severability. If any provision of this Development Agreement shall be adjudged to be invalid, void or unenforceable, such provision shall in no way affect, impair or invalidate any other provision hereof, unless such judgment affects a material part of this Development Agreement, the parties hereby agree that they would have entered into the remaining portions of this Development Agreement not adjudged to be invalid, void or illegal. In the event that all or any portion of this Development Agreement is found to be unenforceable, this Development Agreement or that portion which is found to be unenforceable shall be deemed to be a statement of intention by the parties; and the parties further agree that in such event they shall take all steps necessary to comply with such public hearings and/or notice requirements as may be necessary in order to make valid this Development Agreement or that portion which is found to be unenforceable. Notwithstanding any other provisions of this Development Agreement, in the event that any material provision of this Development Agreement is found to be unenforceable, void or voidable, OWNER or CITY may terminate this Development Agreement in accordance with the provisions of the Development Agreement Statute and the Procedures Resolution. 30.4 Hold Harmless Agreement; Indemnity. 30.4.1 OWNER and CITY hereby mutually agree to, and shall hold each other, each other’s elective and appointive councils, boards, commissions, officers, partners, agents, representatives and employees harmless from any liability for damage or claims for damage for personal injury, including death, and from claims for property damage which may arise from the activities of the other’s or the other’s contractors’, subcontractors’, agents’, or employees’ which relate to the Project whether such activities be by OWNER or CITY, or by any of the OWNER’s or the CITY’s contractors, subcontractors, or by any one or more persons indirectly employed by, or acting as agent for OWNER any of the OWNER’s or the CITY’s contractors or 32 subcontractors. OWNER and CITY agree to and shall defend the other and the other’s elective and appointive councils, boards, commissioners, officers, partners, agents, representatives and employees from any suits or actions at law or in equity for damage caused or alleged to have been caused by reason of the aforementioned activities which relate to the Project. 30.4.2 From and after the execution of this Development Agreement, and except for losses and liabilities related directly or indirectly to the willful misconduct of CITY or its officers or employees, OWNER hereby agrees to indemnify, defend and hold harmless the CITY and its employees, officers, City Council members, Planning Commissioners, representatives, heirs, successors and assigns of all such persons, and each of them, from and against all losses and liabilities related directly or indirectly to, or arising out of or in connection with (i) any of OWNER’s acts or omissions under, related to, or in any respect connected with this Development Agreement and/or the development, ownership (or possession), and operation of the Property and/or the Project, and/or OWNER’s activities on the Property (or the activities of OWNER’s agents, employees, lessees, representatives, licensees, guests, invitees, successors, assigns, contractors, subcontractors or independent contractors on the Property), including without limitation the construction of the Project or the use or condition of the Project, (ii) any claim arising from the ownership (or possession), operation or use of the Property and/or the Project, including any claim relating to or arising from the presence on or under, or the escape, seepage, leakage, spillage, discharge, emission, or release on or from the Property and/or the Project of any Hazardous Materials, and any losses and liabilities arising from or related to any governmental requirements applicable to Hazardous Materials located on the Property. Notwithstanding anything in this Development Agreement which is or appears to be to the contrary, this indemnity shall survive any termination or cancellation of this Development Agreement, unless such termination is the direct or indirect result of the City’s default or breach of this Agreement. 30.5 Cooperation in the Event of Legal Challenge. In the event of any legal action instituted by a third party or other governmental entity or official challenging the validity of any provision of this Development Agreement and/or the Development Approvals, other actions taken pursuant to CEQA, or other approvals under State or CITY codes, statutes, regulations or requirements, and any combination thereof relating to the Project or any portion thereof (“Third Party Challenge”), the parties hereby agree to cooperate fully with each other in defending any such Third Party Challenge and the validity of each provision of this Development Agreement; however, OWNER shall be liable for all legal expenses and costs incurred in defending any such Third Party Challenge and shall reimburse the CITY for its actual costs in defense of the action or proceeding, including, but not limited to the time and expenses of the City Attorney’s Office and any consultants; provided, however, (i) OWNER shall have the right to monthly invoices for all such costs, and (ii) OWNER may elect to terminate this Development Agreement, and upon any such termination, OWNER’s and CITY’s obligations to defend the Third Party Challenge shall cease and OWNER shall have no responsibility to reimburse any CITY defense costs incurred after such termination date. OWNER shall indemnify the CITY from any other liability incurred by the CITY, its officers, and its employees as the result of any Third Party Challenge, including any award to opposing counsel of attorneys’ fees or costs, except where such award is the result of the willful misconduct of CITY or its officers or employees. This section shall survive any judgment invalidating all or any part of this Development Agreement. OWNER shall be entitled to choose legal counsel to defend against any such legal action and shall pay any 33 attorneys’ fees awarded against CITY or OWNER, or both, resulting from any such legal action. OWNER shall be entitled to any award of attorneys’ fees arising out of any such legal action. 30.6 Public Agency Coordination. CITY and OWNER shall cooperate and use their respective best efforts in coordinating the implementation of the Development Approvals with other public agencies, if any, having jurisdiction over the Property or the Project. 30.7 Initiative Measures. Both CITY and OWNER intend that this Development Agreement is a legally binding contract which will supersede any initiative, measure, moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation (whether relating to the rate, timing or sequencing of the Development or construction of all or any part of the Project and whether enacted by initiative or otherwise) affecting parcel or subdivision maps (whether tentative, vesting tentative or final), building permits, occupancy certificates or other entitlements to use approved, issued or granted within the CITY, or portions of the CITY, and which Agreement shall apply to the Project to the extent such initiative, measure, moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation is inconsistent or in conflict with this Development Agreement. Should an initiative, measure, moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance, or other limitation be enacted by the citizens of CITY which would preclude construction of all or any part of the Project, and to the extent such initiative, measure, moratorium, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation be determined by a court of competent jurisdiction to invalidate or prevail over all or any part of this Development Agreement, OWNER shall have no recourse against CITY pursuant to the Development Agreement, but shall retain all other rights, claims and causes of action under this Development Agreement not so invalidated and any and all other rights, claims and causes of action as law or in equity which OWNER may have independent of this Development Agreement with respect to the project. The foregoing shall not be deemed to limit OWNER’s right to appeal any such determination that such initiative, measure, referendum, statute, ordinance or other limitation invalidates or prevails over all or any part of this Development Agreement. CITY agrees to cooperate with OWNER in all reasonable manners in order to keep this Development Agreement in full force and effect, provided OWNER shall reimburse CITY for its out-of-pocket expenses incurred directly in connection with such cooperation and CITY shall not be obligated to institute a lawsuit or other court proceedings in this connection; provided, however, (i) OWNER shall have the right to monthly invoices for all such costs. 30.8 No Waiver. No delay or omission by either party in exercising any right or power accruing upon non-compliance or failure to perform by the other party under any of the provisions of this Development Agreement shall impair any such right or power or be construed to be a waiver thereof. A waiver by either party of any of the covenants or conditions to be performed by the other party shall not be construed as a waiver of any succeeding breach of non- performance of the same or other covenants and conditions hereof. 30.9 Authority to Execute. The person(s) executing this Development Agreement on behalf of OWNER warrants and represents that he/she/they has/have the authority to execute this Development Agreement on behalf of his/her/their limited liability company and represents that he/she has the authority to bind OWNER to the performance of OWNER’s obligations hereunder. 34 30.10 Notice. 30.10.1To Owner. Any notice required or permitted to be given by CITY to OWNER under or pursuant to this Development Agreement shall be deemed sufficiently given if in writing and delivered personally to an officer of OWNER or mailed with postage thereon fully prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, addressed to OWNER as follows: Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. c/o JPI 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 San Diego, California 92130 ATTN: Heidi W. Mather With copies to: Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP 333 South Grand Avenue Los Angeles, California 90071 ATTN: Amy R. Forbes or such changed address as OWNER shall designate in writing to CITY. 30.10.2To CITY. Any notice required or permitted to be given to CITY under or pursuant to this Development Agreement shall be made and given in writing, if by mail addressed to: City Council City of Anaheim c/o City Clerk P.O. Box 3222 Anaheim, California 92803 With copies to: City Manager City of Anaheim P.O. Box 3222 Anaheim, California 92803 City Attorney City of Anaheim P.O. Box 3222 Anaheim, California 92803 or such changed address as CITY shall designate in writing to OWNER. 35 Alternatively, notices to CITY may also be personally delivered to the City Clerk, at the Anaheim Civic Center, 200 S. Anaheim. Blvd., Anaheim, California, together with copies marked for the City Manager and the City Attorney or, if so addressed and mailed, with postage thereon fully prepaid, registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, to the City Council in care of the City Clerk at the above address with copies likewise so mailed to the City Manager and the City Attorney, respectively and also in care of the City Clerk at the same address. The provisions of this Section shall be deemed permissive only and shall not detract from the validity of any notice given in a manner which would be legally effective in the absence of this Section. 30.11 Captions. The captions of the paragraphs and subparagraphs of this Development Agreement are for convenience and reference only and shall in no way define, explain, modify, construe, limit, amplify or aid in the interpretation, construction or meaning of any of the provisions of this Development Agreement. 30.12 Consent. Any consent required by the parties in carrying out the terms of this Development Agreement shall not unreasonably be withheld. 30.13 Further Actions and Instruments. Each of the parties shall cooperate with the other to the extent contemplated hereunder in the performance of all obligations under this Development Agreement and the satisfaction of the conditions of this Development Agreement. Upon the request of either party at any time, the other party shall promptly execute, with acknowledgment or affidavit if reasonably required, and file or record such required instruments and writings and take any actions as may be reasonably necessary under the terms of this Development Agreement to carry out the intent and to fulfill the provisions of this Development Agreement or to evidence or consummate the transactions contemplated by this Development Agreement. 30.14 Subsequent Amendment to Authorizing Statute. This Development Agreement has been entered into in reliance upon the provisions of the Development Agreement Statute in effect as of the Development Agreement Date. Accordingly, subject to Section 23.1 above, to the extent that subsequent amendments to the Government Code would affect the provisions of this Development Agreement, such amendments shall not be applicable to this Development Agreement unless necessary for this Development Agreement to be enforceable or unless this Development Agreement is modified pursuant to the provisions set forth in this Development Agreement and Government Code Section 65868 as in effect on the Development Agreement Date. 30.15 Governing Law. This Development Agreement, including, without limitation, its existence, validity, construction and operation, and the rights of each of the parties shall be determined in accordance with the laws of the State of California. 30.16 Effect on Title. OWNER and CITY agree that this Development Agreement shall not continue as an encumbrance against any portion of the Property as to which this Development Agreement has terminated. 30.17 Mortgagee Protection. Entering into or a breach of this Development Agreement shall not defeat, render invalid, diminish, or impair the lien of Mortgagees having a mortgage on 36 any portion of the Property made in good faith and for value, unless otherwise required by law. No Mortgagee shall have an obligation, liability or duty under this Development Agreement to perform OWNER’s obligations, or to guarantee such performance prior to any foreclosure or deed in lieu thereof. A mortgagee in legal possession of the Property shall not have any obligation or duty under this Development Agreement to construct or complete the construction of improvements, or to pay, perform or provide any fee, dedication, improvements or other monetary payment of any kind; provided however, a Mortgagee in legal possession of the Property or portion thereof shall only be entitled to use of the Property or to construct any improvements on the Property in accordance with the Development Approvals and this Development Agreement if the Mortgagee fully complies with the terms of this Development Agreement. 30.18 Notice of Default to Mortgagee, Right of Mortgagee to Cure. If the City Clerk timely receives notice from a Mortgagee requesting a copy of any notice of default given to OWNER under the terms of this Development Agreement, CITY shall provide a copy of that notice to the Mortgagee within ten (10) days of sending the notice of default to OWNER. The Mortgagee shall have the right, but not the obligation, for a period up to ninety (90) days after the receipt of such notice from CITY to cure or remedy, or to commence to cure or remedy the default unless a further extension of time to cure is granted in writing by CITY. If the default is of a nature which can only be remedied or cured by such Mortgagee upon obtaining possession, such Mortgagee shall seek to obtain possession with diligence and continually through foreclosure, a receiver or otherwise, and shall thereafter remedy or cure the default or non-compliance within thirty (30) days after obtaining possession. If any such default or non-compliance cannot, with diligence, be remedied or cured within such thirty (30) day period, then such Mortgagee shall have such additional time as may be reasonably necessary to remedy or cure such default or non-compliance if such Mortgagee commences cure during such thirty (30) day period, and thereafter diligently pursues and completes such cure. 30.19 Bankruptcy. Notwithstanding the foregoing provisions of Section 30.20 of this Development Agreement, if any Mortgagee is prohibited from commencing or pursuing and prosecuting foreclosure or other appropriate proceedings in the nature thereof by any process or injunction issued by any court or by reason of any action by any court having jurisdiction of any bankruptcy or insolvency proceeding involving CITY, the times specified in this Section for commencing or prosecuting foreclosure or other proceedings shall be extended for the period of the prohibition. 30.20 Disaffirmance. 30.20.1 CITY agrees that in the event of termination of this Development Agreement by reason of any default by CITY, or by reason of the disaffirmance hereof by a receiver, liquidator or trustee for OWNER or its property, CITY, if requested by any Mortgagee, shall enter into a new Development Agreement for the Project with the most senior Mortgagee requesting such new agreement, for the remainder of the Term, effective as of the date of such termination, upon the terms, provisions, covenants and agreements as herein contained to the extent and subject to the law then in effect, and subject to the rights, if any, of any parties then in possession of any part of the Property, provided: 37 30.20.1 The Mortgagee shall make written request upon CITY for the new Development Agreement for the Project within thirty (30) days after the date of termination; 30.20.2 The Mortgagee shall pay to CITY at the time of the execution and delivery of the new Development Agreement for the Project expenses, including reasonable expenses, attorneys’ fees and costs, to which CITY shall have been subjected by reason of OWNER’s default; and 30.20.3 The Mortgagee shall perform and observe all covenants herein contained on OWNER’s part to be performed, and shall further remedy any other conditions which OWNER under the terminated agreement was obligated to perform under its terms, to the extent the same are curable or may be performed by the Mortgagee. 30.20.4 Nothing herein contained shall require any Mortgagee to enter into a new agreement pursuant to Section 30.22.1 above, nor to cure any default of OWNER referred to above. 30.20.5 No Third Party Beneficiaries. This Development Agreement and all provisions hereof is made and entered into for the sole protection and benefit of CITY, OWNER and their successors and assigns. No other person shall have right of action based upon any provision in this Development Agreement. 30.20.6 Project as a Private Undertaking. It is specifically understood and agreed by and between the parties hereto that the Project is a private development, that neither party is acting as the agent of the other in any respect hereunder, and that each party is an independent contracting entity with respect to the terms, covenants and conditions contained in this Development Agreement. No partnership, joint venture or other association of any kind is formed by this Development Agreement. The only relationship between CITY and OWNER is that of a government entity regulating the development of private property and the owner of such private property. 30.20.7 Restrictions. Property OWNER shall place in any agreements to sell or convey any interest in the Property or any portion thereof, provisions making the terms of this Development Agreement binding on any successors in interest of OWNER and express provision for OWNER or CITY, acting separately or jointly, to enforce the provisions of this Development Agreement and to recover attorneys’ fees and costs for such enforcement. 30.21 Recitals. The recitals in this Development Agreement constitute part of this Development Agreement and each party shall be entitled to rely on the truth and accuracy of each recital as an inducement to enter into this Development Agreement. 30.22 Recording. The City Clerk shall cause a copy of this Development Agreement to be executed by CITY and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County no later than ten (10) days after CITY approves this Development Agreement. 30.23 Title Report. CITY is required to sign this Development Agreement only after OWNER has provided CITY with a satisfactory preliminary title report evidencing and showing OWNER’s legal and equitable ownership interest in the Property, current within six (6) months, 38 unencumbered except for the exceptions (hereinafter the “Permitted Exceptions”) set in the preliminary title report for the Property dated _______, attached hereto as Exhibit “F” (the “Preliminary Title Report”). Any instrument of monetary encumbrance such as a deed of trust or a mortgage entered into subsequent to the date of the Preliminary Title Report and prior to the Development Agreement Date, shall contain language expressly subordinating such instruments of monetary encumbrance to the provisions of this Development Agreement. OWNER shall present evidence, satisfactory to CITY, of OWNER’s legal title to Property, subject only to the Permitted Exceptions and any such subordinated instruments of monetary encumbrance, at the time of recordation of this Development Agreement, or a memorandum thereof. 30.24 Entire Agreement. This Development Agreement, constitutes the entire agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter of this Development Agreement, and this Development Agreement supersedes all previous negotiations, discussions and agreements between the parties, and no parol evidence of any prior or other agreement shall be permitted to contradict or vary the terms hereof. 30.25 Successors and Assigns. The burdens of the Development Agreement shall be binding upon, and the benefits of the Development Agreement inure to all successors in interest and assigns of the parties to the Development Agreement. 30.26 Owner’s Title of Property. Neither party hereto shall be bound by any provision of this Development Agreement unless and until OWNER shall record this Development Agreement or a memorandum thereof, in the office of the County Recorder of the County sufficient to cause this Development Agreement and the obligations contained herein to attach to and encumber OWNER’s fee title to Property. 30.27 Recitals and Exhibits. All recitals and exhibits, including attachments thereto, are incorporated in this Development Agreement in their entirety by this reference. 30.28 Estoppel Certificates. Either party may, at any time, and from time to time, deliver written notice to any other party requesting such party to certify in writing that, to the knowledge of the certifying party, (a) this Development Agreement is in full force and effect and a binding obligation of the parties; (b) this Development Agreement has not been modified or amended either orally or in writing, or if so amended, identifying the amendments; (c) the requesting party is not in Default in the performance of its obligations under this Development Agreement, or if in Default, to describe therein the nature and amount of any such Default; and (d) such other information as may reasonably be requested. A party receiving a request hereunder shall execute and return such certificate within thirty (30) days following the receipt thereof. The City Manager or his or her designee shall have the right to execute any certificate requested by OWNER hereunder. CITY acknowledges that a certificate hereunder may be relied upon by transferees, lenders and Mortgagees. 30.29 Organization and Standing of OWNER. OWNER is a company limited partnership duly organized, qualified and validly existing and in good standing under the laws of the State of Texas, and duly qualified to do business in the State of California, and has all requisite power and authority to enter into and perform its obligations under this Development Agreement. 39 30.30 Authorization and Consents. The execution, delivery and performance of this Development Agreement is consistent with OWNER’s executed limited partnership agreement and all amendments thereto and has been duly authorized by all necessary action of OWNER’s general partner. If required by the Planning Director or the City Attorney, OWNER shall provide such evidence as the Planning Director or the City Attorney may reasonably require of the existence, good standing, authority and capacity of OWNER and its general partner to execute, deliver and perform their respective obligations under this Development Agreement, including: (i) a true and complete copy of an executed limited partnership agreement and all amendments thereto; (ii) a copy of the certificate of limited partnership and all amendments thereto accompanied by a certificate issued by the appropriate governmental official of the jurisdiction of formation that the copy is true and complete, and such evidence as the City Attorney may require of registration or qualification to do business in the State of California; and (iii) a partnership affidavit certifying who will be authorized to execute this Development Agreement and a true and complete copy of the partnership resolutions approving this Development Agreement and authorizing the transactions contemplated in this Development Agreement. 30.31 Time of the Essence. Time is of the essence in the performance of each and every covenant and obligation to be performed by the Parties under this Development Agreement. 30.32 Prior Development Agreement Superseded. From and after the date upon which this Development Agreement becomes final and binding and no longer subject to challenge, referendum, litigation or appeal, the Existing Development Agreement shall thereafter be of no further force and effect [Signatures follow on next page.] Signature Page – Jefferson at Stadium Park Development Agreement IN WITNESS WHEREOF, CITY and OWNER have executed this Development Agreement as of the date and year first above written. “CITY” “OWNER” CITY OF ANAHEIM, JEFFERSON AT STADIUM PARK, L.P., a municipal corporation and charter city a Texas limited partnership By: Jefferson at Stadium Park GP, LLC, a Texas limited liability company, its general partner By: By: Mayor Name: Title: ATTEST: LINDA N. ANDAL, CITY CLERK By: APPROVED AS TO FORM: KRISTIN PELLETIER, ACTING CITY ATTORNEY By: Theodore J. Reynolds Assistant City Attorney A-1 EXHIBIT “A” LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF THE PROPERTY THAT PORTION OF THE NORTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 26, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN THE RANCHO SAN JUAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: PARCEL 4, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 81, PAGE 32 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA. EXCEPT THEREFROM THAT PORTION OF PARCEL 4 AS GRANTED TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA BY DEED RECORDED FEBRUARY 22, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 199901241777. B-2-1 EXHIBIT “B-1” FINAL SITE PLAN FOR PHASE 1 OF THE PROJECT [TO BE INSERTED] B-3-1 EXHIBIT “B-2” FINAL SITE PLAN FOR PHASE 2 OF THE PROJECT [TO BE INSERTED] B-4-1 EXHIBIT “B-3” FINAL SITE PLAN FOR PHASE 3 OF THE PROJECT [TO BE INSERTED] D-1 EXHIBIT “C” CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL [TO BE INSERTED FROM DEVELOPMENT APPROVALS] D-1-1 EXHIBIT “D” PLATINUM TRIANGLE INTERIM DEVELOPMENT FEES D-2-1 EXHIBIT “D-1” ELECTRIC UTILITIES UNDERGROUNDING FEE Residential Uses $9.92 per unit The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and the Underground Conversion Program envision that the public utilities along Katella Avenue, between the State College Boulevard and Anaheim Way will need to be undergrounded. The CITY-owned facilities will be undergrounded using CITY funds, pursuant to Rule No. 20 of the City of Anaheim Rates, Rules & Regulations. Some of the facilities along Katella Avenue are owned by Southern California Edison (“SCE”). Moneys available to underground CITY-owned facilities may not be used to underground SCE facilities. The interim fee will collect the funds necessary to underground the SCE lines, and thereby significantly improve the appearance of the Platinum Triangle. The cost to underground the SCE lines is estimated at $187,505. These funds will be collected by imposing an interim fee on the residential units planned in the Platinum Triangle. The formula for calculating the fee is the following: Cost to Underground SCE lines = Per-Unit Fee Number of residential units The Per-Unit fee is calculated at: $187,505 = $9.92 per Unit 18,909 Units D-3-1 EXHIBIT “D-2” GENERAL PLAN AND ENVIRONMENTAL PROCESSING FEE Residential Uses: $24.00 per unit Non-residential Uses: $0.03 per sq. ft. These fees are intended to recover the costs associated with the Platinum Triangle including the designation of portions of the Platinum Triangle for mixed use and office development by the General Plan, the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement Form, Zone Reclassifications, all other associated documents and amendments thereto, and all associated environmental documentation. The fees are based upon the following calculations: Costs Consultant Contract Costs: $670,623 (includes costs related to DSEIR No. 339) Planning Department Costs: $456,765 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339) Public Works Costs: $41,325 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339) $1,168,713 (to be updated with costs related to DSEIR No. 339) New Development Allowed in the Platinum Triangle Non-Residential Uses 14,340,522 square feet office development 4,909,682 square feet commercial development + 1,500,000 square feet institutional 20,750,204 total square feet non-residential development Residential Uses 18,909 residential units x 800 square feet (estimated average unit size) 15,127,200 total square feet of residential development Total Square Feet 20,750,204 total square feet non-residential development + 15,127,200 total square feet of residential development 35,877,404 total square feet of residential and non-residential uses Fees (to be updated with DSEIR Planning and Public Works Costs) $1,168,713 costs = $0.03 per square foot 35,877,404 total square feet Non Residential Uses: $0.03per square foot Residential Uses: $24.00 per unit ($0.03 x 800 square feet) D-3-1 EXHIBIT “D-3” LIBRARY FACILITIES FEE Residential Uses $486.77 per unit The increase of density in the Platinum Triangle to an expected population over 27,000 residents requires the inclusion of a library facility in the Platinum Triangle. The library facilities fee includes the cost of the purchase of a 10,000 square foot commercial condominium shell space with 50 assigned parking spaces as well as FF&E and an opening day collection. The projected project cost for a 10,000 square foot library facility in the Platinum Triangle is $8,004,000. The individual unit library impact fee for the Platinum Triangle is now $486.77 per unit. E-1 EXHIBIT “E” DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS AND MAINTENANCE OBLIGATIONS As a condition of approval of Development Agreement No________, the CITY requires OWNER to undertake and implement the maintenance of certain slopes, landscaping, parks, private streets and private utilities, and the performance of other obligations, in all cases within the Property or immediately adjacent to the Property, as specifically set forth herein. Prior to the earlier of the issuance of the temporary or permanent “Certificate of Occupancy” for the first residential dwelling unit OWNER shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder a declaration of covenants, conditions and restrictions (“CC&Rs”) satisfactory to the Planning Director and the City Attorney creating maintenance obligations for an incorporated association (“Association”) to establish a financial mechanism or financial mechanisms to maintain those areas and facilities (collectively referred to hereinafter as the “Maintenance Obligations”). OWNER; the Master Association; or, an Assessment District satisfactory to CITY will be responsible for the Maintenance Obligations, which include: a. Private streets and street lights; b. Common fences, walls and utility screening devices; c. Private sewer and storm drain lines, together with all appropriate appurtenances; d. All landscape improvements within the boundaries of the Project, including all trees and tree wells, shrubbery and any and all special landscaping; e. Landscape slope areas and all drainage facilities (including, but not limited to, French drains, down drains, drainage swales, retaining and crib wall(s) etc.); f. Landscape maintenance easements; g. Parkway landscaping and irrigation (State College Boulevard, Gene Autry Way, Union Street, Artisan Court); h. Fifty percent (50%) of the cost of street median landscaping, subject to the approval of the Public Works Director; i. All parks and amenities, such as fountains, park benches, trash receptacles and other street furniture; j. All street furniture not maintained by the public utility companies or by the City of Anaheim; k. All special monumentation within the Project; E-2 l. All open spaces; m. All promenades or trails; n. Removal of graffiti within 72 hours of discovery by OWNER; and o. Commercially reasonable recreational amenities. Until such time as the Association is formed, OWNER shall be responsible for the performance of the Maintenance Obligations, including any additional obligations which may be specified herein. Reconveyance of all or part of any property interest therein established for the common enjoyment of the residents in the Project to the party other than the Association shall require (i) the prior written consent of the CITY, (ii) appurtenant easements over the said property for benefit of each and every lot in the Property and (iii) that the reconveyance expressly affirm that the provisions of Civil Code Section 1367 relating to lien rights to enforce delinquent assessments and the CC&Rs shall remain applicable. The CC&Rs may provide any of the Maintenance Obligations may be assumed by a duly formed Platinum Triangle Infrastructure and/or Maintenance Assessment District subject to CITY’s written approval. The covenants and restrictions set forth herein constitute a general scheme for the development, protection and maintenance of the Property for the benefit of all owners. Said covenants and restrictions shall be a burden upon, and a benefit to, not only the OWNER but also its successors and assigns. All of such covenants and restrictions are intended to be and shall be declared in the CC&Rs to be covenants running with the land or equitable servitudes upon the land, as the case may be. The CC&Rs shall provide that termination of the CC&Rs or amendment of any provision which may negatively impact performance of the Maintenance Obligations shall require prior written consent of the CITY. Termination of this Declaration is not a release of Declarant with regard to Declarant’s independent obligations in connection with development and approval of the Project or with regard to obligations and liabilities incurred prior to such termination. F-1 EXHIBIT “F” PRELIMINARY TITLE REPORT [TO BE PROVIDED] G-1 EXHIBIT “G” TRAFFIC CIRCULATION IMPROVEMENTS [TO BE ADDED] H-1 EXHIBIT “H” INFRASTRUCTURE PHASING PLAN 102114640.6 EXHIBIT “C” DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT 2015-00002 (DEV2015-00078) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO FINAL PARCEL MAP APPROVAL 1 Prior to the approval of the Final Parcel Map, information and plans shall be submitted to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval of the following: (a) Sewer and storm drain manhole Locations and Detour Plan Criteria (b) Trash truck turning radius The approved information shall be shown on each Street Improvement Plan submitted to the Public Works Department. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 All existing structures shall be demolished. The developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 The vehicular access rights to State College Boulevard and Gene Autry shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim. The vehicular access rights to Artisan Court, except at the private street openings, shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 4 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section and approved by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of private facilities such as private sewer, Private Street, and private storm drain improvements; compliance with approved Water Quality Management Plan; and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance responsibilities shall include all drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation on State College Boulevard, Gene Autry, Artisan Court and Union, the private Public Works Department, Development Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 5b NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY street name signs and the Private Streets. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. 5 The legal property owner shall post a security and execute a Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to complete the required public improvements including public park at the legal property owner’s expense. Said agreement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Subdivision Section approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. In lieu of a Subdivision Agreement, an amended Development Agreement can be utilized to satisfy this condition of approval. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 6 The parcel map shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and the Orange County Surveyor for technical review and that all applicable conditions of approval have been complied with and then shall be filed in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 7 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim easement for road, public utilities and other public purposes for the widening of Gene Autry Way and State College Blvd to the ultimate right-of-way, including necessary construction easements. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 8 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim easements for road, public utilities and other public purposes, for the proposed Union Street and Artisan Court as shown on the Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 9 Owner shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY Division PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL 10 That if the Project is 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet of floor; 3) A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet of floor space; 4) A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms; 5) A proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet of floor area; 6) A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in this subdivision; 7) A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of water required by a 500 dwelling unit project, then per California Water Code section 10912, the Project shall be subject to a Water Supply Assessment to determine the adequacy of existing water supplies to serve the Project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF FINAL SITE PLAN 11 That prior to the approval of the first Final Site Plan, easements shall be provided by the property owner/developer for surface mounted switches that are integral to electrical circuits to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department. The property owner/developer shall install the duct bank, substructures and provide switch easements as the new streets are installed. The Public Utilities Department will specify the duct bank and easement configurations when a load schedule is available. This information shall be specifically shown on the street improvement plans submitted by the property owner/developer. The backbone circuits will serve the electrical systems required for the individual residential commercial buildings. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 12 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, plans shall indicate that assigned parking spaces shall be provided for each residential unit. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits and evidence in the form of a letter from the property owner/developer shall be provided to the Planning Services Division of the Planning and Building Department showing implementation of this requirement prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for the parking structure. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 13 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, architectural plans shall show all air conditioning facilities and other roof-and ground- mounted equipment shall be properly shielded from view with roof plans, elevations, and with line-of-sight plans. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits and implemented prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 14 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, plans shall identify the location of a mail delivery parking stall and indicate that the stall shall be posted with a sign that indicates it is a reserved space for mail delivery. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits and said parking space and sign shall be installed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 15 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, plans shall indicate that above-ground utility devices are located on private property and outside any required setback areas adjacent to arterial highways or connector streets. Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the approved Final Site Plan, the above-ground utility devices shall be specifically shown on construction plans in locations substantially in accordance with the approved Final Site Plan. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 16 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan including a podium structure, plans shall indicate that all transformers and switching equipment shall be located within electric equipment rooms located within the podium structure. Said locations shall be reviewed and approved by the Public Utilities Department prior to the approval of the Final Site Plan. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 17 That prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, plans shall show that 4-foot-high address numbers shall be displayed on the roof of each building in a contrasting color to the roof material. Said numbers shall not be visible from view of the street or adjacent properties. Said information shall be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department and the Planning Services Division of the Planning and Building Department. Said numbers shall be provided prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building. Police Department 18 That prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall identify on the Final Site Plan easements for emergency, public utility and other public purposes for fire access as required. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate the approved easements to the City of Anaheim. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 19 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan for each podium building, plans shall indicate that a minimum horizontal clearance of 18 feet or other clearance as determined acceptable by the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department shall be provided and maintained on the ground floor parking structure to allow access for the trash bin retrieval vehicle. A “No Parking Between the Hours of 7 A.M. and 5 P.M.” sign shall be posted to allow trash bin retrieval access. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits and the building constructed with the approved clearance and the signs posted prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each podium Public Works Department / Streets & Sanitation Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY building. 20 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, plans shall indicate that trash storage areas and trash chutes shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Department / Streets & Sanitation Division 21 Prior to approval of each Final Site Plan for residential buildings with podium or structured parking, plans shall indicate that a separate 8’ x 10’ enclosed and secured bulky item storage area, located within 25’ of the trash pick-up area, shall be provided and maintained, as required by the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Department / Streets & Sanitation Division 22 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, an on-site trash truck turnaround area shall be provided per Engineering Standard Detail No. 476 and maintained to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division. Said turnaround area shall be specifically shown plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Department / Streets & Sanitation Division 23 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, plans shall show any proposed gates and shall demonstrate that gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public street. The location of any proposed gates shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. The approved gate locations shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits and all gates shall be installed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for the parking lot/parking structure. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 24 Prior to approval of each Final Site Plan with security gates and vehicle turn-around lanes, the location of said gates and lanes and Public Works Department, NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY how they will function shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager and the Fire Department. Traffic Engineering Division 25 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan, plans shall demonstrate that at-grade ducts and overhead pipes shall not encroach in the parking space area or required vehicle clearance area in parking structures. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 26 That prior to approval of each Final Site Plan, the property owner shall identify easements for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad; and twenty (20) foot wide easements for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the property owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the property owner and included and recorded in the CC&Rs. Said easements shall be irrevocably offered for dedication to the City of Anaheim prior to issuance of the first building permit for the Final Site Plan, the first builder final parcel map, or approval of the water improvement (UWM) plan. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division PRIOR TO GRADING PLAN APPROVAL 27 Prior to grading plan approval, the water quality management plan Public Works Department, NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY shall address the following items: • The WQMP shall include additional information such as soils analysis, prior contamination, depth to groundwater, etc. to determine the acceptability and capability of this site to use infiltration. • The criteria identified in the DAMP in order to allow infiltration to occur on a site must be evaluated and deemed adequate for the determination to be made to infiltrate onsite. • The applicant shall obtain approval for infiltration from the City and from the Orange County Water District. The City will coordinate the review of this proposed infiltration system to obtain comments. • The WQMP and grading plans shall show that flows are conveyed to the infiltration areas. • The WQMP shall show the required pretreatment for any focused infiltration. The pretreatment system may be landscape swales, filter strips or bio-retention areas (rain gardens), prior to reaching the infiltration system. Development Services Division 28 Prior to grading plan approval, the applicant shall submit a Drainage Study prepared by a registered professional Civil Engineer in the State of California. The Study shall be based upon and reference the latest edition of the Orange County Hydrology Manual and the applicable City of Anaheim Master Plan of Drainage for the project area. All drainage sub-area boundaries per the Master Plan for Drainage shall be maintained. The Study shall include: an analysis of 10-, 25- and 100-year storm frequencies; an analysis of all drainage impacts to the existing storm drain system based upon the ultimate project build-out condition; and address whether off-site and/ or on- site drainage improvements (such as detention/ retention basins or surface runoff reduction) will be required to prevent downstream properties from becoming flooded. Public Works Department, Development Services Division PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS 29 Prior to issuance of the grading permit and right-of-way construction permit for the storm drain and sewer, whichever occurs first, a Save Harmless agreement in-lieu of an Encroachment Agreement is required to be executed, approved by the City and recorded by the Public Works Department, Development Services NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY applicant on the property for any storm drains connecting to a City storm drain. Division 30 The property owner shall submit project improvement plans that incorporate the required drainage improvements, and the mechanisms proposed in the approved Drainage Report. No offsite run-off shall be blocked during and after grading operations or perimeter wall construction. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 31 The property owner/developer shall submit plans documenting that the design of all aboveground structures (with the exception of parking structures) shall be at least three feet higher that the 100-year flood zone, where applicable, unless otherwise required by the City Engineer. All structures below this level shall be floodproofed to prevent damage to property or harm to people. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 32 That prior to the issuance of the first grading permit for each Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan to the Public Works Department Development Services Division for review and approval that: (a) Addresses Site Design Best Management Practices (BMP’s) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or “zero discharge” areas, and conserving natural areas; (b) Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMP’s as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan; (c) Incorporates Treatment Control BMP’s as defined in the DAMP; (d) Describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMP’s; (e) Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMP’s, and describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMP’s; and (f) Ensures implementation of the Water Quality Management Plan during on-going grading operations. Public Works Department, Development Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 33 Prior to the approval of a mass or rough grading permit, portions of existing infrastructure to be replaced shall be demolished. The property owner/developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division of the Planning and Building Department. Plans submitted for the demolition permit shall include a demolition recycling plan which has been reviewed and approved by the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division. The demolition recycling plan shall indicate type of material to be demolished, anticipated tonnage diverted and anticipated tonnage landfilled. Inert demolition material (dirt, concrete, masonry, asphalt, etc.) shall be disposed of in an inert reclamation site, or diverted by other means rather than landfilled. Streets & Sanitation Division / Public Work 34 The developer/owner shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering Division PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 35 The developer shall submit to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division street improvement plans for the work on State College Boulevard, Gene Autry, Artisan Court, and Union including but not limited to curb and gutter, sidewalk and landscape, storm drain and sewer facilities, and traffic signals. The landscape and irrigation improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance with the Public Works Landscape and Irrigation Manual for Public Street and Highway. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 36 The developer shall post a security to guarantee the construction of public works improvements in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney. The improvements shall be constructed prior to final building and zoning inspections. Public Works Department, Development Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 37 Prior to the approval of each street improvement plan for the connector streets within the project boundary, the property owner/developer shall submit production landscape plans for the street parkways designed in conformance with the approved Landscape Plans of each Final Site Plan exhibit and Section 4 of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP). Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 38 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit associated with the approved Final Site Plan, all units shall be assigned street addresses by the Building Division of the Planning and Building Department. Street names for any new public or private street (if requested by the property owner/developer or required by the City) shall be submitted to and approved by the Building Division. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 39 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, plans shall show that visitor parking spaces shall be posted “No Overnight Parking, Except by Permission of the Management”. Said signs shall be installed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for the parking structure and/or parking lot. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 40 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, plans shall show that satellite or other cable/transmission television wiring (concealed from outside the building) shall be provided to each unit and a note shall be added to the construction drawings stating that individual television service involving the installation of individual dish receivers/transmitters on the exterior of the building shall not be allowed. Said wiring shall be installed in conformance with the approved building plans prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 41 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, the builder shall provide the Planning Services Division of the Planning and Building Department with a copy of a written disclaimer that will be distributed to prospective buyers/lessees Planning and Building Department, Planning NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY indicating that they are purchasing/leasing property that is within close proximity to Angel Stadium of Anaheim, The City National Grove of Anaheim and Honda Center and that the nature of these venues includes potentially audible noise (such as crowd noise, vehicular traffic noise, fireworks, and amplified sound) during events, and traffic delays during event times. On-going during sales/lease of dwelling units and commercial units, the property owner/developer shall provide each buyer/lessee with this written information. Services Division 42 Prior to issuance of any residential building permit for each Final Site Plan area, park fees shall be paid subject to Chapter 17.34 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Community Services Department 43 That prior to the approval the improvement plan for the Public Park the Community Services Department and, if deemed appropriate by the Director of Community Services, the Park and Recreation Commission shall have approval over the following: (a) Approval of Landscape Architect and other consultants used to design the park and prepare the construction documents; (b) Approval of Master Park Plan, schematic plans, preliminary plans and final plans, specifications, cost estimates and other construction documents; (c) Approval of all project materials and products used in constructing the Public Park and the right of inspection by City staff at the property owner/developer’s cost; and (d) Public Park areas shall have amenities including, but not limited to, water features, site furnishings, plantings, shade structures and play features consistent with the approved Landscape Plans for the Public Park; and (e) The owner/developer shall comply with the Community Services Department Naming Policy A-033 for the Public Park. 44 The property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY Division 45 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 46 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 47 The legal owner shall post an electrical performance bond as determined by Public Utilities. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 48 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. New underground electric utility facilities necessary to accommodate the project are typically required to be underground in the City of Anaheim. The underground electrical distribution systems will consist of substructures including vaults, duct banks, pull boxes, and other facilities necessary to meet the proposed power requirements of the development. The underground substructures will be installed by the applicant in accordance with electrical distribution plans and Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY specifications prepared and approved by the Public Utilities Department - Electrical Engineering Division. Electrical facilities and equipment will be installed as required to meet the electrical demand of the development. In addition, all high voltage electrical lines, switches, and transformers installed on private property will require an easement as indicated on the approved plans. It is the developer’s responsibility to coordinate survey activities and construct wet and dry utilities in a manner as to avoid conflicts, and to meet necessary clearance requirements for the on-site electrical distribution system required for service establishment. 49 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 50 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 51 Prior to occupancy, the legal owner shall install street lights as determined and planned by Public Utilities. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 52 Prior to the approval of street improvement plans for each street, or if the electrical improvements are to be located on private property, prior to the approval of the applicable Final Site Plan or builder Public Utilities Department, NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY tentative parcel map, whichever occurs first, plans shall provide for the construction of the electrical facilities required pursuant to Condition No. 32 in the locations approved by the Public Utilities Department provided that: (a) If an easement is to be provided on private property, the property owner/developer shall record an easement on the final map or by separate document satisfactory to the Public Works Department and the City Attorney’s Office prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for the Final Site Plan; (b) The property owner/developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of said facilities; and, (c) The timing for installation of the facilities shall be set forth in the detailed phasing plan required by Section 9.3 (Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities) of this Development Agreement. Electrical Engineering Division 53 Prior to the issuance of the first residential building permit for each Final Site Plan, the property shall be served with underground utilities per the Electrical Rates, Rules, and Regulations, and the City of Anaheim Underground Policy. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 54 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall coordinate its service requirements and relocation issues with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department and the other utility companies involved. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 55 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, or prior to the delivery of combustible materials for construction of buildings, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall complete all necessary water facilities to provide the fire flows required by the Fire Department. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Fire Department NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY building permits. 56 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each building and prior to structural framing, fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required by the Fire Department and shall meet minimum Fire Department Specifications and Requirements for spacing, distance to structure and available fire flow. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Fire Department 57 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, emergency vehicular access shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Fire Department Specifications and Requirements. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Fire Department 58 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each building, the width of all exterior stairwells shall be as determined by the Fire Department in conformance with emergency evacuation standards. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Fire Department 59 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan including a parking structure, plans shall show that closed circuit television (CCTV) security cameras shall be installed to monitor the parking structures and the mailrooms to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Police Department. CCTV cameras shall be strategically located throughout the parking structure, mailroom and lobby, covering all areas, especially all pedestrian and vehicular access points. Further, 2-way communication devices shall be placed in the parking structure as required by the Police Department. All cameras and communication devices shall be installed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each of said Final Site Plans. Police Department NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 60 That prior to issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, plans shall indicate that each individual building and unit shall be clearly marked with its appropriate building number and address. These numbers shall be positioned so they are easily viewed from vehicular and pedestrian pathways throughout the complex. Main building numbers shall be a minimum of 12 inches in height. Main building numbers and address numbers shall be illuminated during hours of darkness. Said numbers shall be installed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building. Police Department 61 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, plans shall indicate that pedestrian and vehicular access control shall be provided to prevent unwanted entry and that a digital keypad entry system shall be provided to facilitate quick response by emergency personnel. Said items shall be installed and the system’s entry code provided to the Anaheim Police Department Communications Bureau and the Anaheim Fire Department prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building. Police Department 62 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, plans shall indicate that adequate lighting shall be provided on all levels of the parking structures, including circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site. Said lighting shall be installed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each parking structure. Police Department 63 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, plans shall show that common rooms, such as gym facilities, recreation areas, laundry rooms, conference rooms, etc., shall have transparent doors, view panels installed in solid doors, or a window installed next to the door for increased visibility into the room. Said features shall be installed prior to the first final building Police Department NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY and zoning inspection for each recreation area. 64 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each parking structure, plans shall show that a minimum lighting level of one (1) foot-candle measured at the parking surface shall be maintained for the parking structure with a maximum to minimum ratio no greater than 10:1. Said lighting shall be installed prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for the parking structure. Police Department 65 Prior to issuance of Building permits, the building pads shall be certified for compaction by the soils engineer and for line and grade by the civil engineer. All pad grade changes shall be submitted to the City as part of a grading permit application for review and approval. Also, the compaction report needs to document all required soil fill and reconditioning procedures by the grading contractor, including compaction testing protocol and maintenance of records. Areas that are not fully documented and certified by the geotechnical engineer and inspected by the City up to the final pad elevation may need to be over-excavated to the satisfaction of the site soils engineer, city Construction Services staff and Development Services Engineer Public Works. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 66 Parkway landscaping and sidewalk shall be constructed with the parkway irrigation connected to the on-site irrigation system and maintained by the property owner. A bond shall be posted in an amount approved by the City Engineer and a form approved by the City Attorney prior to issuance of a building permit. A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the Development Services Division for all work performed in the right-of-way. The landscape parkway improvements shall be constructed pursuant to Section 9.4 (Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities) and Exhibit “H” (Infrastructure Phasing Plan) of this Development Agreement. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 67 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Public Works NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY Plan, the property owner/developer shall provide the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division with a final demolition recycling report signed by the property owner/developer indicating actual tonnage of waste diverted and landfilled. Department / Streets & Sanitation Division 68 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each building, plans shall be submitted providing a separate Knox box for the trash truck at each applicable gate entrance. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Works Department / Streets & Sanitation Division 69 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each Final Site Plan, the proposed development shall submit a final written Solid Waste Management Plan signed by the property owner to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval. The property owner/developer shall then operate in accordance with the approved written Solid Waste Management Plan, as it may be modified from time to time subject to written approval by the Director of Public Works. Said Solid Waste Management Plan shall be referred to in the project’s Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) which shall be recorded for the property. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division 70 Prior to City acceptance of the public right-of-way improvements for all collector streets identified on the Final Site Plans, said streets shall be posted with “No Stopping Any Time” signs except where designated turn-out areas are provided for loading and unloading and designated on-street parking areas. Such signs shall be shown on street improvement plans submitted by the property owner/developer for the review and approval by the Public Works Department and the location of such signs shall be reviewed and approved by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for all costs associated with the installation of such signs. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 71 Prior to applying for the first water meter or fire service or first submittal of the Water Improvement Plans, the developer/owner shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 72 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, a private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 73 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 74 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 75 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use if necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no Public Utilities Department, Water NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Engineering Division 76 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC & Rs for the project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 77 The developer/owner shall submit a water system master plan, including a hydraulic distribution network analysis, for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval. The master plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the proposed on-site water system to meet the project’s ultimate water demands and fire protection requirements. If development is to be constructed in more than one phase, the master plan shall include a phasing plan with supporting hydraulic network analysis for the various phases showing that any proposed incremental phasing is adequate to provide municipal demands and fire flow protection for the proposed development phasing and the water facilities installed under said incremental phasing are sized to provide the future municipal demands and fire protection for the Project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 78 The developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 79 Water improvement plans shall be submitted to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 80 Individual water service and/or fire line connections will be required for each parcel or residential or commercial unit per Rule 18 of the City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 81 Applicant shall contact Water Engineering for recycled water system requirements and specific water conservation measures to be incorporated into the building and landscape construction plans. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 82 Water submetering shall be furnished and installed by the Owner/Developer and a water submeter shall be installed to each individual unit. Provisions for the ongoing maintenance and operation (including meter billing) of the submeters shall be the responsibility of the Owner/Developer and included and recorded in the Master CC Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY & Rs for the project. Division 83 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, all existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standard Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use if necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 84 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each building, the owner/developer shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire hydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire hydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twenty (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the CC&Rs. Such information shall be shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 85 Prior to the first submittal of Water Improvement Plans, the developer/owner shall submit a water system master plan, including a hydraulic distribution network analysis, for Public Utilities Water Engineering Division review and approval. The master plan shall demonstrate the adequacy of the proposed on-site water system to Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY meet the project’s water demands and fire protection requirements. Division 86 Prior to applying for the first water meter or fire service or first submittal of the Water Improvement Plans, the developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 87 That prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each building, Platinum Triangle water facilities fee and/or advances to the Water Engineering Division shall be paid in accordance with Rule 15D of the Water Utility Rates, Rules and Regulations. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 88 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit for each building, the owner/developer shall contact the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division for recycled water system requirements and specific water conservation measures to be incorporated into the building and landscape construction plans. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 89 That water facilities shall be protected from runoff from adjacent properties. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division PRIOR TO FIRST FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION FOR EACH FINAL SITE PLAN NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 90 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan the property owner/developer shall execute and record with the Orange County Recorder an unsubordinated declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&Rs) to run with the land, satisfactory to the Planning Director, Public Works Director and the City Attorney, creating maintenance obligations to maintain private on-site common areas and facilities (collectively referred to hereinafter as the "Maintenance Areas and Facilities") as indicated below: • Private drives and parking (if applicable), including sidewalks, landscaping, street lighting, mounted lighting, signage, striping and parkways. • Private sewer lines, grease interceptors, manholes and clean outs. • Private storm drain lines, area drains, inlets, manholes and catch basins. • Treatment Controls Best Management Practices for Water Quality Management Plan Best Management Practices, as required pursuant to Conditions Nos. 73 and 74. • Demonstrate that the applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMP’s described in the Project WQMP as required pursuant to Condition No. 75. • Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies for (all responsible parties) of the approved Project WQMP are available on-site as required pursuant to Condition No. 75. • Internal landscape areas, courtyards, common areas. • Internal hardscape. • On-site fountains and art elements. • Enclosed parking structures with mail facilities, trash collection areas, and bicycle storage. • Recreational amenities areas including pools & spas, barbecue areas, clubhouse meeting room(s) and workout room. • Public restrooms. • Site lighting systems. • Trash collection and facilities including the Solid Waste Management Plan for the project as approved by the City. • Squeal-free surface in parking structure. • Maintenance of on-site signs and awnings. Public Works Department, Development Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY • Outdoor seating and dining areas. • Maintenance of all security equipment required by the Police Department including antennas providing radio communication. • Maintenance of private water meters. • Removal of graffiti within 24 hours of occurrence. • That a sign shall be posted in each trash collection area indicating “No Parking Between the Hours of 7 A.M. and 5 P.M.” to allow sufficient access for the trash bin retrieval vehicle pursuant to Condition No. 90 • Maintenance of all special surface improvements within adjacent public street right-of-way if approved in conjunction with a Final Site Plan. • Requirement for lease agreements or purchase and sales agreements for each commercial establishment to include a provision for hours of delivery to be limited to 7 a.m. to 10 p.m. daily. • Requirement for lease agreements or purchase and sales agreements for each commercial establishment to include a provision there shall be no public telephones located outside any building. • Provision for the maintenance of all associated private water line improvements. • Ongoing during operation, provision for the property to be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by providing regular landscape maintenance and removal trash or debris. • Provision for the replacement of any tree planted on-site in accordance with project landscaping plans in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased, and/or dead. 91 Prior to occupancy, the legal owner shall install street lights as determined and planned by Public Utilities. The legal owner shall post a bond for street lighting as determined by Public Utilities per Rule 24 front foot fees. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 92 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan, the relocation of existing facilities and/or installation of Public Utilities NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY new systems shall be timed to coincide with the level of development that would require this improvement, to the satisfaction of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department and other utility companies. Department 93 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall provide the City of Anaheim with a public utilities easement (per final electrical design), along/across high voltage lines, low voltage lines crossing private property, and around all pad-mounted transformers, switches, capacitors, etc. Said easement shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim prior to connection of electrical service. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 94 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan, any required relocation of City electrical facilities shall be completed at the property owner/developer’s expense. Landscape and/or hardscape screening of all pad-mounted equipment shall be required outside the easement area of the equipment. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 95 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan, all electrical facilities that are located on the project boundary shall be relocated underground and all existing services that are fed from the overhead system shall be converted to underground at the expense of the property owner/developer. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 96 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan or approval of on-site water plans, whichever occurs first, unless each commercial building is initially connected to separate fire services, an unsubordinated covenant satisfactory to the City Attorney’s office shall be recorded prohibiting any individual sale of buildings until separate fire services are installed in the buildings(s) subject to the sale. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 97 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building, an automatic fire sprinkler system shall be designed, installed and maintained as required by the Fire Department. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Fire Department 98 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building, a fire alarm system shall be designed, installed and maintained as required by the Fire Department. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Fire Department 99 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building, lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates shall be equipped with Knox devices as required and approved by the Fire Department. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Fire Department 100 That prior to the final Public Works inspection for the public street improvements, and prior to the final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall: (a) Demonstrate that all structural BMP’s described in the Project WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications; (b) Demonstrate that the applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMP’s described in the Project WQMP; and, (c) Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved Project WQMP are available on-site. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 101 Prior to final building and zoning inspections of each development phase, all required WQMP items for proper operation of the system shall be inspected and operational. Public Works Department, Development Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 102 All required public street, landscaping, irrigation, sewer and drainage improvements shall be constructed prior to final building and zoning inspections and are subject to review and approval by the Construction Services inspector. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 103 That prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building, the property owner/developer shall construct sewers and storm drains to serve the ultimate development of the property as provided by area-wide engineering studies to be conducted prior to issuance of any building permits for the first permitted building and updated prior to the issuance of any building permits for each subsequent permitted building. All studies shall be subject to the approval of the City Engineer. The property owner/developer shall construct improvements identified in such studies. The systems may be constructed incrementally subject to the approval of the City Engineer provided that said incremental phasing is adequate to provide capacity for the proposed development phasing and providing that the timing is in accordance with the detailed phasing plan required by Section 9.4 (Timing, Phasing and Sequence of Public Improvements and Facilities) of this Development Agreement. Public Works Department, Development Services Division ONGOING DURING PROJECT CONSTRUCTION 104 During construction of the Public Park, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for all utility connections, fees, permits and charges, all consultant, project inspection and staff time costs for project plan and construction review and any incidental costs relating to the park improvement, as approved by the Community Services Department. Community Services Department 105 An all-weather access road as approved by the Fire Department shall be provided during construction. Fire Department ONGOING DURING PROJECT OPERATION NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 106 The Owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be included in the recorded Master C, C & R’s for the project and the City easement deeds. Public Utilities, Water Engineering Division 107 That ongoing during operation of any restaurant, and at all times when the premises is open for business, the premises shall be maintained as a bona fide public eating place, as defined by Section 23038 of the State of California Business and Professions Code, and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. Police Department 108 That ongoing during operation of each restaurant, there shall be no live entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premises at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim. Police Department 109 That ongoing during business operations of each commercial establishment, all activities occurring in conjunction with the operation of said establishment shall not cause noise disturbance to surrounding uses. Police Department 110 Ongoing during business operations, the property owner shall be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, within any right-of-way, public utility easement or City easement area including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, walls, decorative hardscape or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for maintenance of all said special surface improvements shall be Public Works Department / Development Services Division NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY included in the recorded CC&Rs and the City easement deeds. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 111 The developer shall improve the streets as follows: 1) improve private streets per City Standard Detail 162 or as approved by the City Engineer, 2) improve State College Boulevard and Gene Autry per the Platinum Triangle Implementation Master Plan or as approved by the City Engineer (public), c) improve the interior collector streets (Union and Artisan Court per the Connector Streets requirements of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 112 A temporary construction easement (TCE) is required (6’ min. from the ultimate right of way on State College Blvd.) to facilitate the required ultimate street improvements prior to the phase III development. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 113 Prior to the park construction being deemed complete by the Community Services Department, the Public Park shall be developed in accordance with Community Services Department standards and will be subject to Community Services Department approval. Community Services Department 114 The required Public Park shall be completed to the satisfaction of the Director of Community Services not later than the issuance of the first final certificate of occupancy on the Property. Community Services Department 115 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each Final Site Plan, all electrical facilities that are located on the project boundary shall be relocated underground and all existing services that are fed from the overhead system shall be converted to underground at the expense of the property owner/developer. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for building permits. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division 116 The developer shall install the 16-inch water main in State College Public NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY Boulevard from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court per the Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan or as approved by the Utilities General Manager. Utilities, Water Engineering Division GENERAL 117 Provide 6’ minimum setback from the ultimate right of way along State College Blvd. if fencing is proposed for parcel 3 to be installed prior to development of Phase III. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 118 A minimum of two connections to public water mains and water looping inside the project are required. Public Utilities, Water Engineering Division 119 The following minimum horizontal clearances shall be maintained between proposed water main and other facilities: • 10-feet minimum separation (outside wall-to-outside wall) from sanitary sewer mains and laterals • 5-feet minimum separation from all other utilities, including storm drains, gas, and electric • 6-feet minimum separation from curb face • 10-feet minimum separation from all trees • 10-feet minimum separation from structure footings and walls There shall be a 1 foot minimum vertical clearance between proposed water connections and all other utilities including electric, gas, sewers and storm drains. Public Utilities, Water Engineering Division 120 No public water main or public water facilities shall be installed in private alleys or paseo areas. Public Utilities, Water Engineering NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY Division 121 No public water mains or laterals allowed under parking stalls or parking lots. Public Utilities, Water Engineering Division 122 On an annual basis and as part of the Development Agreement Annual Review, the property owner/developer shall provide an updated Development Summary Table to the Planning Services Division of the Planning and Building Department until project build out. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 123 The property owner developer shall be responsible for compliance with and any direct costs associated with the monitoring and reporting of all mitigation measures set forth in the attached Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan (MMP) No. 330, established by the City of Anaheim as required by Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code to ensure implementation of those identified mitigation measures within the timeframes identified in the measure. MMRP No. 330 is made a part of these conditions of approval by reference. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 124 During ongoing business operations, the property owner/developer shall not charge for “event parking” for Honda Center, The City National Grove of Anaheim or Angel Stadium of Anaheim unless approved by the City. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 125 Signage shall be consistent with Section 18.20.150 (Signs) of the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone. Planning and Building Department, NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY Planning Services Division 126 Park fee credit will be given for Public Park in the amount set forth in Section 9.2 of the Development Agreement, provided the parks comply with the following criteria: (a) Park fee credit shall be granted, subject to the Community Services Department approval, based upon the provision of a site(s) acceptable to the Community Services Department that meets a 2% to 5% gradient, unless approved otherwise by the Community Services Department, with no easements and other obstructions, except as required for park development, being considered for credit; (b) All plans for public park improvements are subject to approval by the Community Services Department; (c) Park credit will not be given for portions of the right-of-way, sidewalks to commercial encumbrance and residential areas, road easements or any other improvement that will lessen the actual amount of park space; (d) Park credit against fees will only be provided for sites approved by the Community Services Department and only for the per acre value of the land, as established by the current City Council approved park in lieu fee ordinance and resolution; and, (e) No park fee credit shall be granted for any private park or recreational improvements provided with the development. Community Services Department 127 All facilities in this project fall within the Platinum Triangle and are subject to Public Safety Impact Fees. Police Department 128 Compliance with AMC 6016, the Anaheim Public Safety Radio System Coverage Ordinance is required. To request a copy of the ordinance, contact Officer Budds at (714) 765-3859 or mbudds@anaheim.net. A copy of the ordinance can also be Police Department NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY viewed/download online through the City of Anaheim web site under “City Records”: http://www.anaheim.net/. 129 In order to facilitate the efficient and rapid access by emergency vehicles and personnel, all electrically operated gates providing emergency vehicle access to any residential facility/community development with more than 20 (twenty) residential units, or when otherwise required by the Chief of Police or his designated representative, shall include the installation of an electronic access system which allows for the use of a public safety radio frequency to open the gate. Police Department 130 All mitigation measures from MMRP No. 330 apply to this project. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 131 The required public improvements shall be installed pursuant to the Infrastructure Phasing Plan (Exhibit “H”) of the Development Agreement. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 132 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed meter, Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no equals. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 133 The project is expressly conditioned upon the applicants' indemnifying and holding harmless the City, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions and their Planning and Building Department / NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY members and the City Council from any claim, action or proceeding brought against any of the foregoing individuals or entities, the purpose of such litigation being to attack, set aside, void or annul any approval of the application or related decision, or the adoption of any environmental documents which relates to the approval of the Proposed Actions. This indemnification shall include, but is not limited to, all reasonable damages, costs, expenses, attorney fees or expert witness fees that may be awarded to the prevailing party, and costs of suit, attorneys' fees, and other costs, liabilities and expenses arising out of or in connection with the approval of the application or related decision, whether or not there is concurrent, or passive negligence on the part of the City, its agents, officers, council members, employees, boards, commissions and their members and the City Council. The property owner/developer shall have the right to select legal counsel. The City shall have the right to approve, which approval will not be unreasonably withheld, the legal counsel providing the City’s defense, and the applicant shall reimburse the City for any costs and expenses reasonably incurred by the City in the course of the defense. No later than 30 (thirty) days following the City Council's adoption of the Ordinance adopting Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, the legal property owner shall provide a letter to the City satisfactory to the City Attorney's Office memorializing the foregoing. City Attorney’s Office ATTACHMENT NO. 5c EXIST.INDUSTRIALBLDG.EXIST.INDUSTRIALBLDG. O F F I C E F U T U R E E X T E N S I O N O F A R T I S A N C O U R T N O T A P A R T VACANT LOTTRASHROOM #1 TRASHROOM #2TRASHSTAGING AREATRASHLOADING AREA SANITATION TRUCKHAMMERHEAD AREA UPDNUPUPDNUP 'X ' % XS1B1A1A9A2/B1A2A2 A6A6 A6 A6B1S1A1 B1A4B1B1B1 OPENOPENB4/A9 A4 B1A6A6A4/B2B1 B1A4 A4A5 A3 A4A4/B2 C1A1A1A4A4/B2A1A1A1 A4/B2 A4 C1A1A4/B2 A5S1A3A6A6A4/B2 A4CLUB HOUSEFITNESS4830 S.F.A4 ABV.PASSAGEWAYA4 ABV.B2 ABV.A5 ABV.A5 ABV.PASSAGEWAYPASSAGEWAYS1A5A5LEASING4300 S.F.A9 ABV.A4 ABV.B4 ABV.B5 ABV.B1 ABV.A5A5A1A4B1B5A1PASSAGEWAYA9/B4A4A9/B4 PASSAGEWAYDOGWASHBIKEKIT.B1 ABV.METERSB1 OPEN RECREATIONAREACOURTYARDENTRY COURTYARD B1JEFFERSON STADIUM PARKJPI12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380, San Diego, CA 92130 c 2 0 1 5 A r c h i t e c t s O r a n g e A N A H E I M , C A . 1 4 - 2 0 6 J O B N O : h e s e p l a n s a r e c o p y r i g h t p r o t e c t e d n d e r s u c h p r o t e c t i o n u n a u t h o r i z e d u s e i s n o t p e r m i t t e d h e s e p l a n s s h a l l n o t b e r e p r o d u c e d o r u s e d w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n b y r c h i t e c t s r a n g e 3 - 2 2 - 1 6 D A T E : 1 4 4 N O R T H O R A N G E S T R E E T , O R A N G E , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 8 6 6 ( 7 1 4 ) 6 3 9 - 9 8 6 0 C O N C E P T U A L S O L I D W A S T E M A N A G E M E N T P L A N - B U I L D I N G ' A ' A - 3 . 2 0 N 2 5 ' 5 0 ' 1 0 0 ' 1 5 0 ' T R A S H N A R R A T I V E T h e w r i t t e n S o l i d W a s t e D i s p o s a l a n d R e c y c l i n g M a n a g e m e n t P l a n i s e x p l a i n e d a s f o l l o w s : T r a s h T r u c k R o u t i n g T r a s h t r u c k s w i l l e n t e r t h e s i t e f r o m G e n e A u t r y W a y s o u t h o n t o U n i o n . T r u c k s w i l l t r a v e l s o u t h o n U n i o n S t r e e t a n d t u r n l e f t i n t o t h e p r o j e c t a t t h e s o u t h d r i v e w a y a n d p a r k a d j a c e n t t o t h e t r a s h s t a g i n g a r e a l o c a t e d o n t h e n o r t h s i d e o f t h e p r o j e c t d r i v e w a y a n d c o m m e n c e o p e r a t i o n s . A f t e r c o m p l e t i n g p i c k - u p , t r u c k s w i l l u s e t h e t u r n - a r o u n d a r e a a t t h e e n d o f t h e d r i v e w a y a n d e x i t o n t o U n i o n S t r e e t a n d c o n t i n u e n o r t h t o G e n e A u t r y W a y . T r a s h R o o m s - A m i n . t o t a l o f s i x t e e n ( 1 6 ) 2 - y a r d t r a s h b i n s a r e a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e o n s i t e a t a l l t i m e s f o r a t w i c e a w e e k p i c k - u p s c h e d u l e . - T r a s h b i n s e a c h w i t h i n t r a s h r o o m : T r a s h R o o m # 1 w i l l h a v e e i g h t ( 8 ) ; T r a s h R o o m # 2 w i l l h a v e e i g h t ( 8 ) . - T r a s h r o o m s : D i m e n s i o n s f o r T r a s h R o o m # 1 a r e + / - 1 8 ' - 0 " x 3 9 ' - 0 " ( 7 0 2 s . f . ) ; D i m e n s i o n s f o r T r a s h R o o m # 2 a r e + / - 1 8 " - 0 " x 3 9 ' - 0 " ( 7 0 2 s . f . ) . C o l l e c t i o n w i l l b e v i a c o m m i n g l e d & c o m p a c t e d r e c y c l a b l e a n d s o l i d w a s t e t r a s h c h u t e s l o c a t e d w i t h i n t w o s e p a r a t e e n c l o s u r e s a t t h e n o r t h e a s t a n d s o u t h e a s t c o r n e r s o f t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e o n L e v e l 1 . T h e t w o t r a s h e n c l o s u r e s w i l l p r o v i d e f o r a t o t a l n u m b e r o f s i x t e e n 2 - y a r d t r a s h b i n s o n - s i t e f o r t w i c e a w e e k p i c k u p . E a c h t r a s h e n c l o s u r e w i l l h a v e m u l t i p l e 2 - y a r d b i n s t h a t w i l l s u p p o r t a t w o t r a s h c h u t e f o r t r a s h . T e n a n t s w i l l n o t a c c e s s t h e e n c l o s u r e s d i r e c t l y , b u t t h r o u g h t r a s h - c h u t e r o o m s l o c a t e d a t e v e r y l e v e l o f t h e b u i l d i n g o f f t h e r e s i d e n t i a l c o r r i d o r s . T h e t r a s h c h u t e s w i l l c o n t a i n a m e c h a n i s m t h a t w i l l a l l o w c o m p l e t e s h u t - o f f i n o r d e r t o r e m o v e / r e p l a c e t h e b i n s a s t h e y r e q u i r e e m p t y i n g a n d l i m i t a c c e s s t o a l l o t h e r f l o o r s w h e n a n y o n e c h u t e d o o r i s o p e n e d . A p o r t e r w i l l b e r e q u i r e d t o m o n i t o r t h e t r a s h l e v e l s t h r o u g h o u t t h e d a y a s a p a r t o f d a i l y d u t i e s . A v e h i c l e a p p r o p r i a t e f o r t o w i n g t r a s h b i n s w i l l b e p a r t o f c o n t r a c t i n g w i t h t h e s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r . S t a g i n g A r e a T h e S t a g i n g A r e a i s w h e r e t h e c o l l e c t i o n o f a l l b i n s w i l l t a k e p l a c e a n d w h e r e t h e h a u l e r ( t r a s h t r u c k ) w i l l p i c k - u p t h e b i n s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , a m i n . 8 ' x 1 0 ' l o c a t i o n f o r b u l k y i t e m s t o r a g e w i l l b e p r o v i d e d o n - s i t e a t L e v e l 1 o f t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e . P r o p e r t y M a n a g e m e n t p e r s o n n e l w i l l r e t r i e v e b u l k y i t e m s f r o m t h e s t o r a g e a r e a a n d t r a n s p o r t t o t h e s t a g i n g a r e a a l o n g t h e p r o j e c t d r i v e w a y . B u l k y i t e m s w i l l n o t b l o c k t h e a c c e s s t o t h e b i n s i n t h e s t a g i n g a r e a . M a i n t e n a n c e o f T r a s h R o o m s T h e m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e t r a s h r o o m s w i l l b e m o n i t o r e d a n d m a n a g e d b y P r o p e r t y M a n a g e m e n t . R o l l O u t S e r v i c e a n d P i c k - u p C o l l e c t i o n b i n s w i l l b e m o v e d f r o m t h e t w o t r a s h r o o m s o n L e v e l 1 o f t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e w i t h a n a p p r o p r i a t e r e t r i e v a l v e h i c l e ( s t i n g e r - t r u c k ) . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r w i l l c o n t r a c t f o r t h e p r o p e r t y m a n a g e m e n t c o m p a n y t o p r o v i d e o n - s i t e t r a s h m a n a g e m e n t t o e n s u r e t h a t f u l l b i n s a r e r e p l a c e d w i t h e m p t y o n e s . A S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r w i l l b e c o n t r a c t e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r t o e m p t y t h e b i n s a s n e c e s s a r y p e r s c h e d u l e . T h e r e n t a l / o w n e r s h i p o f t h e b i n s a n d t h e t r a s h s e r v i c e f o r t h e t e n a n t s w i l l b e p a i d f o r b y t h e b u i l d i n g o w n e r . T h e S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r w i l l b e c o n t r a c t e d t o p r o v i d e s t i n g e r - t r u c k s e r v i c e f o r c o n v e y a n c e o f b i n s t o t h e s t a g i n g a r e a a n d c o l l e c t i o n o f b i n s f r o m t h e s t a g i n g a r e a . T h e b u i l d i n g o w n e r w i l l a l s o p a y f o r s e w e r a n d s t r e e t s w e e p i n g s e r v i c e s . L E G E N D S T I N G E R T R U C K R O U T E S A N I T A T I O N T R U C K H A M M E R H E A D T U R N A R E A 1 4 ' M I N I M U M V E R T I C A L C L E A R A N C E R E S I D E N T I A L T R A S H S U M M A R Y L E V E L 1 L E V E L 2 L E V E L 3 L E V E L 6 ( + 0 ' ) ( + 1 0 ' - 1 " ) ( + 2 0 ' - 2 " ) ( + 3 0 ' - 3 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E ( + 7 6 ' - 0 " ) L E V E L 4 L E V E L 5 ( + 4 0 ' - 4 " ) ( + 5 0 ' - 5 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F R O O F D E C K A M E N I T Y ( + 8 6 ' - 1 0 " ) L E V E L 1 L E V E L 2 L E V E L 3 L E V E L 6 ( + 0 ' ) ( + 1 0 ' - 1 " ) ( + 2 0 ' - 2 " ) ( + 3 0 ' - 3 " ) L E V E L 4 L E V E L 5 ( + 4 0 ' - 4 " ) ( + 5 0 ' - 5 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E ( + 7 6 ' - 0 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F R O O F D E C K A M E N I T Y ( + 8 6 ' - 1 0 " ) EAST ELEVATION (UNION ST.)NORTH ELEVATION (GENE AUTRY WAY)JEFFERSON STADIUM PARKJPI12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380, San Diego, CA 92130 c 2 0 1 5 A r c h i t e c t s O r a n g e A N A H E I M , C A . 1 4 - 2 0 6 J O B N O : T h e s e p l a n s a r e c o p y r i g h t p r o t e c t e d . U n d e r s u c h p r o t e c t i o n u n a u t h o r i z e d u s e i s n o t p e r m i t t e d . T h e s e p l a n s s h a l l n o t b e r e p r o d u c e d o r u s e d w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n b y A r c h i t e c t s O r a n g e . 1 - 1 2 - 1 6 D A T E : A R C H I T E C T S O R A N G E 1 4 4 N O R T H O R A N G E S T R E E T , O R A N G E , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 8 6 6 ( 7 1 4 ) 6 3 9 - 9 8 6 0 C O N C E P T U A L B U I L D I N G ' A ' E L E V A T I O N S A - 3 . 8 0 1 0 ' 2 0 ' 4 0 ' 6 0 ' 1 E X T E R I O R F I N I S H P L A S T E R - S M O O T H F I N I S H M A T E R I A L S A N D F I N I S H L E G E N D 2 V I N Y L W I N D O W 3 F A B R I C A T E D M E T A L R A I L I N G W I T H P E R F O R A T E D M E T A L I N S E R T S M E T A L P A N E L G E N E A U T R Y S I T E A S I T E B S I T E C K E Y M A P N N O T E : A L L M A T E R I A L S N O T E D O R A P P R O V E D E Q U A L A R T I S A N W A Y UNION ST. PRIVATE ST. F I B E R C E M E N T F A C A D E 4 5 2 . V I E W L O O K I N G S O U T H W E S T A T G E N E A U T R Y & U N I O N S T . 2 1. VIEW LOOKING SOUTHEAST AT GENE AUTRY WAY 1 1 L E V E L 1 L E V E L 2 L E V E L 3 L E V E L 6 ( + 0 ' ) ( + 1 0 ' - 1 " ) ( + 2 0 ' - 2 " ) ( + 3 0 ' - 3 " ) L E V E L 4 L E V E L 5 ( + 4 0 ' - 4 " ) ( + 5 0 ' - 5 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E ( + 7 6 ' - 0 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F R O O F D E C K A M E N I T Y ( + 8 6 ' - 1 0 " ) L E V E L 1 L E V E L 2 L E V E L 3 L E V E L 6 ( + 0 ' ) ( + 1 0 ' - 1 " ) ( + 2 0 ' - 2 " ) ( + 3 0 ' - 3 " ) L E V E L 4 L E V E L 5 ( + 4 0 ' - 4 " ) ( + 5 0 ' - 5 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E ( + 7 6 ' - 0 " ) T A L L E S T P O I N T O F R O O F D E C K A M E N I T Y ( + 8 6 ' - 1 0 " ) JEFFERSON STADIUM PARKJPI12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380, San Diego, CA 92130 c 2 0 1 5 A r c h i t e c t s O r a n g e A N A H E I M , C A . 1 4 - 2 0 6 J O B N O : T h e s e p l a n s a r e c o p y r i g h t p r o t e c t e d . U n d e r s u c h p r o t e c t i o n u n a u t h o r i z e d u s e i s n o t p e r m i t t e d . T h e s e p l a n s s h a l l n o t b e r e p r o d u c e d o r u s e d w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n b y A r c h i t e c t s O r a n g e . 1 - 1 2 - 1 6 D A T E : A R C H I T E C T S O R A N G E 1 4 4 N O R T H O R A N G E S T R E E T , O R A N G E , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 8 6 6 ( 7 1 4 ) 6 3 9 - 9 8 6 0 C O N C E P T U A L B U I L D I N G ' A ' E L E V A T I O N S A - 3 . 9 0 1 0 ' 2 0 ' 4 0 ' 6 0 ' 1 E X T E R I O R F I N I S H P L A S T E R - S M O O T H F I N I S H M A T E R I A L S A N D F I N I S H L E G E N D 2 V I N Y L W I N D O W 3 F A B R I C A T E D M E T A L R A I L I N G W I T H P E R F O R A T E D M E T A L I N S E R T S M E T A L P A N E L G E N E A U T R Y S I T E A S I T E B S I T E C K E Y M A P N N O T E : A L L M A T E R I A L S N O T E D O R A P P R O V E D E Q U A L A R T I S A N W A Y UNION ST. PRIVATE ST. F I B E R C E M E N T F A C A D E 4 5 SOUTH ELEVATION WEST ELEVATION 4 . V I E W L O O K I N G N O R T H W E S T A T A R T I S A N W A Y 3. VIEW LOOKING NORTHEAST AT ARTISAN WAY AND UNION S T . 4 3 EXIST.MULTIFAMILYBLDG.EXIST.OFFICEBLDG.TRASHROOM #1TRASHROOM #2 TRASHSTAGING AREATRASHLOADING AREA RETAIL TRASHROOM #1 X % X % X 'x 'DOGWASH RETAIL5300 S.F.RETAIL4500 S.F.RETAILTRASHROOMRETAILELECT.ROOMC1A8B3 B3METERSLEASING3700 S.F.UPUPUPUP UPMETERSUPUP B2 ABV.METERS UPA8A8A8B3A8A8A8A8A8A4A4B2A4/B2 A4 A4 A4 A4/B2PARCELSB3JEFFERSON STADIUM PARKJPI12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380, San Diego, CA 92130 c 2 0 1 5 A r c h i t e c t s O r a n g e A N A H E I M , C A . 1 4 - 2 0 6 J O B N O : h e s e p l a n s a r e c o p y r i g h t p r o t e c t e d n d e r s u c h p r o t e c t i o n u n a u t h o r i z e d u s e i s n o t p e r m i t t e d h e s e p l a n s s h a l l n o t b e r e p r o d u c e d o r u s e d w i t h o u t w r i t t e n p e r m i s s i o n b y r c h i t e c t s r a n g e 3 - 2 2 - 1 6 D A T E : 1 4 4 N O R T H O R A N G E S T R E E T , O R A N G E , C A L I F O R N I A 9 2 8 6 6 ( 7 1 4 ) 6 3 9 - 9 8 6 0 A - 5 . 2 0 N 1 5 ' 3 0 ' 6 0 ' 9 0 ' C O N C E P T U A L S O L I D W A S T E M A N A G E M E N T P L A N - B U I L D I N G ' C ' T R A S H N A R R A T I V E T h e w r i t t e n S o l i d W a s t e D i s p o s a l a n d R e c y c l i n g M a n a g e m e n t P l a n f o r t h e R e s i d e n t i a l B u i l d i n g i s e x p l a i n e d a s f o l l o w s : T r a s h T r u c k R o u t i n g T r a s h t r u c k s w i l l e n t e r t h e s i t e f r o m S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d . w e s t o n t o A r t i s a n C o u r t . T r u c k s w i l l t r a v e l w e s t o n A r t i s a n C o u r t a n d t u r n r i g h t o n t o t h e P r i v a t e S t r e e t h e a d i n g n o r t h a n d p a r k a d j a c e n t t o t h e t r a s h s t a g i n g a r e a l o c a t e d o n t h e e a s t s i d e o f t h e P r i v a t e S t r e e t a n d c o m m e n c e o p e r a t i o n s . A f t e r c o m p l e t i n g p i c k - u p , t r u c k s w i l l c o n t i n u e n o r t h t o n t h e P r i v a t e S t r e e t a n d t u r n r i g h t o n G e n e A u t r y W a y t o w a r d s t h e t r a f f i c l i g h t a t S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d . T r a s h R o o m s - A m i n . t o t a l o f f i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) 2 - y a r d t r a s h b i n s a r e a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e o n s i t e a t a l l t i m e s f o r a t w i c e a w e e k p i c k - u p s c h e d u l e . - T r a s h b i n s e a c h w i t h i n t r a s h r o o m : T r a s h R o o m # 1 w i l l h a v e s e v e n ( 7 ) ; T r a s h R o o m # 2 w i l l h a v e e i g h t ( 8 ) . - T r a s h r o o m s : D i m e n s i o n s f o r T r a s h R o o m # 1 a r e + / - 1 8 ' - 0 " x 4 4 ' - 0 " ( 7 9 2 s . f . ) ; D i m e n s i o n s f o r T r a s h R o o m # 2 a r e + / - 1 8 " - 0 " x 3 9 ' - 0 " ( 7 0 2 s . f . ) . C o l l e c t i o n w i l l b e v i a c o m m i n g l e d & c o m p a c t e d r e c y c l a b l e a n d s o l i d w a s t e t r a s h c h u t e s l o c a t e d w i t h i n t w o s e p a r a t e e n c l o s u r e s a t t h e n o r t h w e s t a n d s o u t h w e s t c o r n e r s o f t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e o n L e v e l 1 . T h e t w o t r a s h e n c l o s u r e s w i l l p r o v i d e f o r a t o t a l n u m b e r o f s i x t e e n 2 - y a r d t r a s h b i n s o n - s i t e f o r t w i c e a w e e k p i c k u p . E a c h t r a s h e n c l o s u r e w i l l h a v e m u l t i p l e 2 - y a r d b i n s t h a t w i l l s u p p o r t a t w o t r a s h c h u t e f o r t r a s h . T e n a n t s w i l l n o t a c c e s s t h e e n c l o s u r e s d i r e c t l y , b u t t h r o u g h t r a s h - c h u t e r o o m s l o c a t e d a t e v e r y l e v e l o f t h e b u i l d i n g o f f t h e r e s i d e n t i a l c o r r i d o r s . T h e t r a s h c h u t e s w i l l c o n t a i n a m e c h a n i s m t h a t w i l l a l l o w c o m p l e t e s h u t - o f f i n o r d e r t o r e m o v e / r e p l a c e t h e b i n s a s t h e y r e q u i r e e m p t y i n g a n d l i m i t a c c e s s t o a l l o t h e r f l o o r s w h e n a n y o n e c h u t e d o o r i s o p e n e d . A p o r t e r w i l l b e r e q u i r e d t o m o n i t o r t h e t r a s h l e v e l s t h r o u g h o u t t h e d a y a s a p a r t o f d a i l y d u t i e s . A v e h i c l e a p p r o p r i a t e f o r t o w i n g t r a s h b i n s w i l l b e p a r t o f c o n t r a c t i n g w i t h t h e s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r . S t a g i n g A r e a T h e S t a g i n g A r e a i s w h e r e t h e c o l l e c t i o n o f a l l b i n s w i l l t a k e p l a c e a n d w h e r e t h e h a u l e r ( t r a s h t r u c k ) w i l l p i c k - u p t h e b i n s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , a m i n . 8 ' x 1 0 ' l o c a t i o n f o r b u l k y i t e m s t o r a g e w i l l b e p r o v i d e d o n - s i t e a t L e v e l 1 o f t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e . P r o p e r t y M a n a g e m e n t p e r s o n n e l w i l l r e t r i e v e b u l k y i t e m s f r o m t h e s t o r a g e a r e a a n d t r a n s p o r t t o t h e s t a g i n g a r e a a l o n g t h e p r o j e c t d r i v e w a y . B u l k y i t e m s w i l l n o t b l o c k t h e a c c e s s t o t h e b i n s i n t h e s t a g i n g a r e a . M a i n t e n a n c e o f T r a s h R o o m s T h e m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e t r a s h r o o m s w i l l b e m o n i t o r e d a n d m a n a g e d b y P r o p e r t y M a n a g e m e n t . R o l l O u t S e r v i c e a n d P i c k - u p C o l l e c t i o n b i n s w i l l b e m o v e d f r o m t h e t w o t r a s h r o o m s o n L e v e l 1 o f t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e w i t h a n a p p r o p r i a t e r e t r i e v a l v e h i c l e ( s t i n g e r - t r u c k ) . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r w i l l c o n t r a c t f o r t h e p r o p e r t y m a n a g e m e n t c o m p a n y t o p r o v i d e o n - s i t e t r a s h m a n a g e m e n t t o e n s u r e t h a t f u l l b i n s a r e r e p l a c e d w i t h e m p t y o n e s . A S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r w i l l b e c o n t r a c t e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r t o e m p t y t h e b i n s a s n e c e s s a r y p e r s c h e d u l e . T h e r e n t a l / o w n e r s h i p o f t h e b i n s a n d t h e t r a s h s e r v i c e f o r t h e t e n a n t s w i l l b e p a i d f o r b y t h e b u i l d i n g o w n e r . T h e S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r w i l l b e c o n t r a c t e d t o p r o v i d e s t i n g e r - t r u c k s e r v i c e f o r c o n v e y a n c e o f b i n s t o t h e s t a g i n g a r e a a n d c o l l e c t i o n o f b i n s f r o m t h e s t a g i n g a r e a . T h e b u i l d i n g o w n e r w i l l a l s o p a y f o r s e w e r a n d s t r e e t s w e e p i n g s e r v i c e s . L E G E N D S T I N G E R T R U C K R O U T E S A N I T A T I O N T R U C K H A M M E R H E A D T U R N A R E A 1 4 ' M I N I M U M V E R T I C A L C L E A R A N C E T h e w r i t t e n S o l i d W a s t e D i s p o s a l a n d R e c y c l i n g M a n a g e m e n t P l a n f o r t h e R e t a i l S p a c e i s e x p l a i n e d a s f o l l o w s : T r a s h R o o m s - A m i n . t o t a l o f e i g h t ( 8 ) 3 - y a r d t r a s h b i n s a r e a n t i c i p a t e d t o b e o n s i t e a t a l l t i m e s f o r a o n c e a d a y p i c k - u p s c h e d u l e . - T r a s h b i n s e a c h w i t h i n t r a s h r o o m : T r a s h R o o m # 1 w i l l h a v e e i g h t ( 8 ) - T r a s h r o o m s : D i m e n s i o n s f o r T r a s h R o o m # 1 a r e + / - 3 0 ' - 0 " x 2 6 ' - 0 " ( 7 8 0 s . f . ) C o l l e c t i o n w i l l b e v i a a s e r v i c e c o r r i d o r r u n n i n g b e h i n d t h e r e t a i l s s t o r e s a n d a c c e s s e d b y r e t a i l e m p l o y e e s / p r o p e r t y m a n a g e m e n t e m p l o y e e s o n l y . T h e t r a s h r o o m w i l l p r o v i d e f o r a m i n . o f e i g h t 3 - y a r d t r a s h b i n s o n - s i t e f o r o n c e a w e e k p i c k u p . A p o r t e r w i l l b e r e q u i r e d t o m o n i t o r t h e t r a s h l e v e l s t h r o u g h o u t t h e d a y a s a p a r t o f d a i l y d u t i e s . A v e h i c l e a p p r o p r i a t e f o r t o w i n g t r a s h b i n s w i l l b e p a r t o f c o n t r a c t i n g w i t h t h e s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r . S t a g i n g A r e a T h e S t a g i n g A r e a i s w h e r e t h e c o l l e c t i o n o f a l l b i n s w i l l t a k e p l a c e a n d w h e r e t h e h a u l e r ( t r a s h t r u c k ) w i l l p i c k - u p t h e b i n s . M a i n t e n a n c e o f T r a s h R o o m s T h e m a i n t e n a n c e o f t h e t r a s h r o o m s w i l l b e m o n i t o r e d a n d m a n a g e d b y P r o p e r t y M a n a g e m e n t . R o l l O u t S e r v i c e a n d P i c k - u p C o l l e c t i o n b i n s w i l l b e m o v e d f r o m t h e t r a s h r o o m a t t h e r e t a i l a r e a w i t h a n a p p r o p r i a t e r e t r i e v a l v e h i c l e ( s t i n g e r - t r u c k ) . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r w i l l c o n t r a c t f o r t h e p r o p e r t y m a n a g e m e n t c o m p a n y t o p r o v i d e o n - s i t e t r a s h m a n a g e m e n t t o e n s u r e t h a t f u l l b i n s a r e r e p l a c e d w i t h e m p t y o n e s . A S e r v i c e P r o v i d e r w i l l b e c o n t r a c t e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r t o e m p t y t h e b i n s a s n e c e s s a r y p e r s c h e d u l e . R E S I D E N T I A L T R A S H S U M M A R Y R E T A I L T R A S H S U M M A R Y L E G E N D E X U G E L E C T R I C A L E X G A S M A I N E L E C T R E N C H T E L E P H O N E T R E N C H 8 ' x 1 0 ' P A D M O U N T E D T R A N S F O R M E R G A S T R E N C H C A T V T R E N C H 3 ' x 5 ' T E L E P H O N E P U L L B O X G A S M E T E R J O I N T T R E N C H GENERAL NOTES:1. DESIGN OF THE TRENCH ROUTE AND EXCAVATION AREAS ARE DERIVED FROM IMPROVEMENT SITE PLANS, UTILITY PLAT MAPS, UTILITY REDLINES, AND/OR DO C U M E N T A T I O N P R O V I D E D B Y O T H E R A G E N C I E S . A D V A N C E UTILITY DESIGN, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFORMATION THAT MAY PROVE TO BE INACCURATE. SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES BE FOUND. CONTA C T A D V A N C E U T I L I T Y D E S I G N , I N C . F O R A P P R O P R I A T E ACTION.2. ALL TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVIDING UTILITIES STANDARDS.3. TYPICAL TRENCH CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN ARE FOR GENERAL SEPARATION AND DEPTH REFERENCE ONLY AND DOES NOT INDICATE ACTUAL NUMBER OF C O N D U I T S T H A T M A Y B E R E Q U I R E D . S E E I N D I V I D U A L U T I L I T Y CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.4. IN NO CASE SHALL ELECTRIC PRIMARY OR SECONDARY (EXCLUDING STREET LIGHTING) BE PLACED AT A LEVEL HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE GAS AND COMMU N I C A T I O N . 5. COMPOSITE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR MATERIAL ORDERING. ALL STRUCTURES (VAULTS, PEDESTALS, PADS, ENCLOSURES AND/OR OTHER UTILITY FA C I L I T I E S ) S H O W N O N T H E S E P L A N S A R E U S E D T O D E T E R M I N E GENERAL EXCAVATION SIZING ONLY, AND MAY NOT BE THE FINAL PRODUCT INSTALLED IN FIELD.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CORRECT UTILITY FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY MATERIAL. SEE INDIVIDUAL UTILITY PLANS.7. STREET LIGHT FEEDER TRENCH MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON COMPOSITE PLANS. REFER TO STREET LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION PLANS.8. NON-UTILITY FACILITIES MAY NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY JOINT UTILITY TRENCH. E.G., IRRIGATION CONTROL LINE, BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, PRIVATE TEL E P H O N E S Y S T E M S , O U T D O O R E L E C T R I C A L C A B L E , E T C . 9. MAINTAIN PROPER SEPARATIONS BETWEEN ALL "DRY" UTILITIES AND "WET" UTILITIES. THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN "DRY" A N D " W E T " U T I L I T I E S I S T H R E E ( 3 ) F E E T , W I T H A M I N I M U M O F ONE (1) FOOT OF UNDISTURBED EARTH, OR THE INSTALLATION OF A SUITABLE BARRIER BETWEEN THE FACILITIES.10. SEPARATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ABOVE GROUND TERMINATION POINTS.11. ALL NOTED FOOTAGES ARE HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE TO STRUCTURE LENGTHS. ACTUAL CONDUIT SHALL VARY. 8 ' x 1 4 ' x 9 . 5 ' E L E C T R I C A L V A U L T 2 ' x 3 ' C A T V P U L L B O X 2 ' x 3 ' N O D E & P O W E R S U P P L Y P h o n e 9 5 1 . 3 0 8 . 6 0 0 8 F a x 9 5 1 . 3 0 8 . 6 0 2 8 2 9 9 7 0 T e c h n o l o g y D r i v e , S u i t e 1 1 0 M u r r i e t a , C A 9 2 5 6 3 ,'(('4510 56#&+7/2#4- Building A Utility Composite Exhibit 1 : 2 0   Q H    0 3 - 2 2 - 2 0 1 6 A U D I J O H N V O R I S J P I 0 0 1 S C A L E : 1 " = 2 0 ' R E V I S I O N S P h o n e 9 4 9 . 5 8 2 . 2 7 5 5 F a x 9 4 9 . 5 8 2 . 2 7 4 4 3 2 4 A v e n i d a D e L a E s t r e l l a S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 P h o n e 9 5 1 . 3 0 8 . 6 0 0 8 F a x 9 5 1 . 3 0 8 . 6 0 2 8 2 9 9 7 0 T e c h n o l o g y D r i v e , S u i t e 1 1 0 M u r r i e t a , C A 9 2 5 6 3 ,'(('4510 56#&+7/2#4- Building B Utility Composite Exhibit 1 : 2 0   Q H    0 3 - 2 2 - 2 0 1 6 A U D I J O H N V O R I S J P I 0 0 1 S C A L E : 1 " = 2 0 ' R E V I S I O N S P h o n e 9 4 9 . 5 8 2 . 2 7 5 5 F a x 9 4 9 . 5 8 2 . 2 7 4 4 3 2 4 A v e n i d a D e L a E s t r e l l a S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 L E G E N D E X U G E L E C T R I C A L E X G A S M A I N E L E C T R E N C H T E L E P H O N E T R E N C H 8 ' x 1 0 ' P A D M O U N T E D T R A N S F O R M E R G A S T R E N C H C A T V T R E N C H 3 ' x 5 ' T E L E P H O N E P U L L B O X G A S M E T E R J O I N T T R E N C H GENERAL NOTES:1. DESIGN OF THE TRENCH ROUTE AND EXCAVATION AREAS ARE DERIVED FROM IMPROVEMENT SITE PLANS, UTILITY PLAT MAPS, UTILITY REDLINES, AND/OR DO C U M E N T A T I O N P R O V I D E D B Y O T H E R A G E N C I E S . A D V A N C E UTILITY DESIGN, INC. ASSUMES NO RESPONSIBILITY FOR INFORMATION THAT MAY PROVE TO BE INACCURATE. SHOULD ANY DISCREPANCIES BE FOUND. CONTA C T A D V A N C E U T I L I T Y D E S I G N , I N C . F O R A P P R O P R I A T E ACTION.2. ALL TRENCHING AND EXCAVATION SHALL BE CONSTRUCTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH PROVIDING UTILITIES STANDARDS.3. TYPICAL TRENCH CROSS SECTIONS SHOWN ARE FOR GENERAL SEPARATION AND DEPTH REFERENCE ONLY AND DOES NOT INDICATE ACTUAL NUMBER OF C O N D U I T S T H A T M A Y B E R E Q U I R E D . S E E I N D I V I D U A L U T I L I T Y CONSTRUCTION DRAWINGS.4. IN NO CASE SHALL ELECTRIC PRIMARY OR SECONDARY (EXCLUDING STREET LIGHTING) BE PLACED AT A LEVEL HIGHER THAN THAT OF THE GAS AND COMMU N I C A T I O N . 5. COMPOSITE PLANS ARE NOT TO BE USED FOR MATERIAL ORDERING. ALL STRUCTURES (VAULTS, PEDESTALS, PADS, ENCLOSURES AND/OR OTHER UTILITY FA C I L I T I E S ) S H O W N O N T H E S E P L A N S A R E U S E D T O D E T E R M I N E GENERAL EXCAVATION SIZING ONLY, AND MAY NOT BE THE FINAL PRODUCT INSTALLED IN FIELD.6. CONTRACTOR SHALL VERIFY CORRECT UTILITY FACILITIES TO BE INSTALLED PRIOR TO ORDERING ANY MATERIAL. SEE INDIVIDUAL UTILITY PLANS.7. STREET LIGHT FEEDER TRENCH MAY NOT BE SHOWN ON COMPOSITE PLANS. REFER TO STREET LIGHTING CONSTRUCTION PLANS.8. NON-UTILITY FACILITIES MAY NOT BE ALLOWED IN ANY JOINT UTILITY TRENCH. E.G., IRRIGATION CONTROL LINE, BUILDING FIRE ALARM SYSTEMS, PRIVATE TEL E P H O N E S Y S T E M S , O U T D O O R E L E C T R I C A L C A B L E , E T C . 9. MAINTAIN PROPER SEPARATIONS BETWEEN ALL "DRY" UTILITIES AND "WET" UTILITIES. THE MINIMUM ALLOWABLE HORIZONTAL SEPARATION BETWEEN "DRY" A N D " W E T " U T I L I T I E S I S T H R E E ( 3 ) F E E T , W I T H A M I N I M U M O F ONE (1) FOOT OF UNDISTURBED EARTH, OR THE INSTALLATION OF A SUITABLE BARRIER BETWEEN THE FACILITIES.10. SEPARATIONS SHALL BE MAINTAINED AT ABOVE GROUND TERMINATION POINTS.11. ALL NOTED FOOTAGES ARE HORIZONTAL STRUCTURE TO STRUCTURE LENGTHS. ACTUAL CONDUIT SHALL VARY. 8 ' x 1 4 ' x 9 . 5 ' E L E C T R I C A L V A U L T 2 ' x 3 ' C A T V P U L L B O X 2 ' x 3 ' N O D E & P O W E R S U P P L Y P h o n e 9 5 1 . 3 0 8 . 6 0 0 8 F a x 9 5 1 . 3 0 8 . 6 0 2 8 2 9 9 7 0 T e c h n o l o g y D r i v e , S u i t e 1 1 0 M u r r i e t a , C A 9 2 5 6 3 ,'(('4510 56#&+7/2#4- Building C Utility Composite Exhibit 1 : 2 0   Q H    0 3 - 2 2 - 2 0 1 6 A U D I J O H N V O R I S J P I 0 0 1 S C A L E : 1 " = 2 0 ' R E V I S I O N S P h o n e 9 4 9 . 5 8 2 . 2 7 5 5 F a x 9 4 9 . 5 8 2 . 2 7 4 4 3 2 4 A v e n i d a D e L a E s t r e l l a S a n C l e m e n t e , C A 9 2 6 7 2 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 6 -1- PC2016-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVE TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2015-174, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH. (TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2015-174) (DEV2015-00078) WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR-57 Freeway") freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR-57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center ("ARTIC"), and surrounding residential and mixed use development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels, restaurants, and retail development; and WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500-room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000-square-foot exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-site parking spaces. The Grove of Anaheim, the Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were either developed or renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and - 2- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle. The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed-Use, Office-High, Office-Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the aforementioned development intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle; and WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City’s new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"), approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007 and in response to the application of AMB Property, L.P. (“Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of a mixed-use master planned community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses, up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 1.7-acre public park, and related improvements (the "Original Project") on certain real property consisting of approximately 17.5 acres and bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the north, and Artisan Court on the south (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 335, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 143, were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the - 3- PC2016-*** Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original Project; and WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan Amendment No. 2006-00446, to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2006-00162 to amend the PTMLUP to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (3) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2007-00054 to amend The PTMU Overlay Zone to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (4) Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05134 to permit building heights over 100 feet (up to 300 feet proposed) for the proposed Gene Autry Experience project; (5) Development Agreement No. 2006-00004; and (6) Tentative Tract Map No. 17089 to establish a 21-lot, mixed use subdivision with 1,208 residential units; 100,000 square feet of office uses; and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses (collectively, the “Original Development Approvals”); and WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007, the City Council approved the Original Development Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the Original Development Agreement on or about September 11, 2007, which was recorded in the Official Records of the County of Orange on November 16, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000687363 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units, 5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847 square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including - 4- PC2016-*** FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and WHEREAS, the Original Owner's request for an amendment to the Original Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial period of ten (10) years was approved by the City Council on September 25, 2012. Accordingly, on or about October 2, 2012, the City and Original Owner entered into that certain Amendment No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on October 25, 2012 as Instrument No. 2012000652444 (“Amendment No. 1”); and WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development Approvals shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Existing Entitlements”; and WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No. 1"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5 Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162 of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report had occurred; and WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107") to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the "Mixed-Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum Gateway Project"); and - 5- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No. 3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13-acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 1005-11105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet, resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No. 6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No. 4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1-acre (approximate) property commonly known as 1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000 and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the "A-Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the “A-Town” Project located at State College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and WHEREAS, the Property consists of 1 parcel currently designated for use as “Mixed Use and Open Space" on the land use map of the General Plan. This parcel is zoned "I" Industrial and is located within the Gene Autry District of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and, as such, is subject to and must comply with the land use intensities and the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code; and WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim received a verified petition from the Owner to approve proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 to subdivide the site into three numbered lots that correspond with the proposed apartment buildings and one lettered lot for a proposed park, and to establish a new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and public recreation/park areas to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim for the "Project" (as defined below). - 6- PC2016-*** Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 is proposed in conjunction with the Owner's application for the following additional entitlements, which, together with Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, are intended to permit the development of approximately, but not to exceed, 1,079 residential dwelling units inclusive of 12 live/work units, a public park consisting of approximately 1.1 acres, and approximately, but not to exceed, 98,000 square feet of commercial/retail uses, and a network of local streets (the "Project"): 1. An amendment to the General Plan to reflect the relocation and combination of the two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use ("General Plan Amendment No. 2015- 00506"); 2. An amendment to the PTMLUP to be consistent with General Plan Amendment No. 201-00506 to, among other things, reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments based on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621"); 3. Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, to provide for the development of the Project and certain vested development rights in connection therewith; WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015- 00621, Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed New Entitlements"; and WHEREAS, in connection with the Proposed New Entitlements, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, has been prepared in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in the previously-approved FSEIR No. 339 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe. FSEIR No. 339, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No. 2, Addendum No. 3, Addendum No. 4, and Addendum No. 5, together with Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of 1970, as amended ("CEQA"), and the State CEQA Guidelines relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA Documents"; and WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony concerning the contents and sufficiency of Addendum No. 5 and for and against the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith; and - 7- PC2016-*** WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with, but prior in time to, the adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission has found and determined and has recommended that the City Council so find and determine the following: 1. That Addendum No. 5 together with the other CEQA Documents collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to CEQA relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project; and 2. That, pursuant to the findings contained in said concurrent resolution, the CEQA Documents satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project and, together with Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 330 for the Project, should be approved and adopted; and 3. That no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under CEQA for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project. WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project, including Addendum No. 5, together with the other CEQA Documents, this Planning Commission has heretofore adopted its Resolutions recommending that the City Council amend (1) the General Plan by approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, and (2) the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan by approving and adopting Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621; and WHEREAS, after careful consideration of Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 and after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered at said hearing, this Planning Commission does find and determine and recommends that the City Council so find and determineis the following facts: 1. That the proposed subdivision of the Property, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim, as amended by General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, now pending, and the land use intensities and the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code; 2. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed Project; 3. That the design of the subdivision, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 and with the conditions imposed, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified; - 8- PC2016-*** 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 and with the conditions imposed, is not likely to cause serious public health problems; and 5. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements, as shown on proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 and with the conditions imposed, will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of proposed Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, Addendum No. 5, the other CEQA Documents, and the evidence received to date, does hereby approve and recommends that the City Council approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, contingent upon and subject to (1) the approval of the other Proposed New Entitlements, specifically General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621 and Development Agreement No. 2015- 00002, (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project; and (3) the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and all of the conditions set forth herein above. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 9- PC2016-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of May 16, 2016. CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 10- PC2016-*** EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RELATED TO TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2015-174 NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO FINAL PARCEL MAP APPROVAL 1 Prior to the approval of the Final Parcel Map, information and plans shall be submitted to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval of the following: (a) Sewer and storm drain manhole Locations and Detour Plan Criteria (b) Trash truck turning radius The approved information shall be shown on each Street Improvement Plan submitted to the Public Works Department. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 2 All existing structures shall be demolished. The developer shall obtain a demolition permit from the Building Division. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 3 The vehicular access rights to State College Boulevard and Gene Autry shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim. The vehicular access rights to Artisan Court, except at the private street openings, shall be released and relinquished to the City of Anaheim. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 4 A maintenance covenant shall be submitted to the Subdivision Section and approved by the City Attorney's office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of private facilities such as private sewer, Private Street, and private storm drain improvements; compliance with approved Water Quality Management Plan; and a maintenance exhibit. Maintenance responsibilities shall include all drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation on State College Boulevard, Gene Autry, Artisan Court and Union, the private street name signs and the Private Streets. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the final map. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 5 The legal property owner shall post a security and execute a Subdivision Agreement, in a form approved by the City Attorney, to complete the required public improvements including public park at the legal property owner’s expense. Said agreement shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Subdivision Section approved by the City Attorney and City Engineer. In lieu of a Subdivision Agreement, an amended Development Agreement can be utilized to satisfy this condition of approval. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 6 The parcel map shall be submitted to and approved by the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works and the Orange County Surveyor for technical review and that all applicable conditions of approval have been complied with Public Works Department, Development Services - 11- PC2016-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT and then shall be filed in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. Division 7 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim easement for road, public utilities and other public purposes for the widening of Gene Autry Way and State College Blvd to the ultimate right-of-way, including necessary construction easements. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 8 The property owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim easements for road, public utilities and other public purposes, for the proposed Union Street and Artisan Court as shown on the Tentative Track Map No. 2015-174. Public Works Department, Development Services Division 9 Owner shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION MAP 10 Prior to the recordation of the applicable subdivision map, as determined by the Fire Chief in consultation with City staff, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City for the installation of traffic signal preemption equipment for the surrounding controlled intersections. Fire Department PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF APPLICABLE SUBDIVISION MAP 11 That if the Project is 1) residential development of more than 500 dwelling units; 2) A proposed shopping center or business establishment employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 500,000 square feet of floor; 3) A proposed commercial office building employing more than 1,000 persons or having more than 250,000 square feet of floor space; 4) A proposed hotel or motel, or both, having more than 500 rooms; 5) A proposed industrial, manufacturing, or processing plant, or industrial park planned to house more than 1,000 persons, occupying more than 40 acres of land, or having more than 650,000 square feet of floor area; 6) A mixed-use project that includes one or more of the projects specified in this subdivision; 7) A project that would demand an amount of water equivalent to, or greater than, the amount of water required by a 500 dwelling unit project, then per California Water Code section 10912, the Project shall be subject to a Water Supply Assessment to determine the adequacy of existing water supplies to serve the Project. Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division 12 Prior to the approval of the Final Master Tract Map, the legal owner shall post an electrical performance bond as determined by Public Utilities per Rule 24 front foot fees. Public Utilities Department, Electrical Utilities Division A T T A C H M E N T N O . 6 a ATTACHMENT NO. 7 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project Development Project No. 2015-00078 Prepared for: City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Contact: Scott Koehm, Senior Planner Prepared by: 31878 Camino Capistrano, Suite 200 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Contact: Collin Ramsey, Project Manager MAY 2016 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 Printed on 30% post-consumer recycled material. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 i May 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ..................................................................................... V 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 1.1 California Environmental Quality Act .................................................................... 2 1.2 Project Summary ..................................................................................................... 2 1.3 Purpose and Need ................................................................................................... 2 1.4 Project Background ................................................................................................. 3 1.5 CEQA Requirements for Preparation of an Addendum ......................................... 4 1.6 Type of CEQA Compliance Document and Level of Analysis .............................. 6 1.7 Format and Content of this Addendum ................................................................... 8 1.8 Preparation and Processing of this Addendum ....................................................... 9 1.9 Initial Study Checklist........................................................................................... 10 1.10 Existing Documents to be Incorporated by Reference ......................................... 11 1.11 Points of Contact ................................................................................................... 11 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................13 2.1 Project Location .................................................................................................... 13 2.2 Environmental Setting .......................................................................................... 13 2.3 Jefferson Stadium Park Project ............................................................................. 14 2.4 Construction and Phasing ..................................................................................... 39 2.5 Project Approvals.................................................................................................. 42 3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST ....................................................................................43 3.1 Aesthetics .............................................................................................................. 55 3.1.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............... 59 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources...................................................................... 59 3.2.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............... 61 3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................................ 61 3.3.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............... 75 3.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................................ 79 3.4.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............... 85 3.5 Cultural Resources ................................................................................................ 85 3.5.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............... 89 3.6 Geology and Soils ................................................................................................. 89 3.6.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............... 95 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Section Page No. 9289.1 ii May 2016 3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................................... 95 3.7.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 106 3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ...................................................................... 115 3.8.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 122 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ............................................................................. 122 3.9.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 130 3.10 Land Use and Planning ....................................................................................... 131 3.10.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 137 3.11 Mineral Resources .............................................................................................. 137 3.11.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 138 3.12 Noise ................................................................................................................... 138 3.12.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 154 3.13 Population and Housing ...................................................................................... 156 3.13.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 157 3.14 Public Services .................................................................................................... 157 3.14.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 161 3.15 Recreation ........................................................................................................... 162 3.15.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 164 3.16 Transportation and Traffic .................................................................................. 164 3.16.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 189 3.17 Utilities and Service Systems.............................................................................. 196 3.17.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project ............. 201 3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance ................................................................... 210 4 REFERENCES AND PREPARERS ............................................................................213 4.1 References Cited ................................................................................................. 213 4.2 List of Preparers .................................................................................................. 217 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. 9289.1 iii May 2016 APPENDICES A SEIR Summary of Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Level of Significance After Mitigation (Table 1–4 of Final SEIR No. 339) B Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling C Biological Resources D Cultural Resources Memorandum E Geotechnical Exploration Report F Phase I Environmental Site Assessment G Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan and Drainage Study H Noise Modeling I Traffic Impact Study J Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire and Domestic Water Service Study FIGURES 2-1 Regional Map .....................................................................................................................15 2-2 Vicinity Map ......................................................................................................................17 2-3 General Plan Land Use Designations ................................................................................19 2-4 Zoning Classifications .......................................................................................................21 2-5 Gene Autry District ............................................................................................................23 2-6 Site Plan .............................................................................................................................25 2-7A Architectural Elevations Phase I ........................................................................................29 2-7B Architectural Elevations Phase II.......................................................................................31 2-7C Architectural Elevations Phase III .....................................................................................33 2-8 Public Park Plan .................................................................................................................35 3.12-1 Modeled Traffic Noise Receivers ....................................................................................147 3.16-1 Trip Distribution Assumptions ........................................................................................167 3.16-2 Daily and Peak-Hour Project-Only Trip Assignments ....................................................169 3.16-3 Existing Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Counts ................................173 3.16-4 Existing + Project Roadway ADT & Peak-Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes .............175 3.16-5 Existing + Ambient + Cumulative Roadway ADT & Peak-Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes ...............................................................................................................179 3.16-6 Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project Roadway ADT & Peak-Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes ...........................................................................................181 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) Page No. 9289.1 iv May 2016 TABLES 3.3-1 Construction Scenario Assumptions ..................................................................................66 3.3-2 Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions .........................................................67 3.3-3 Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Emissions ...........................................................69 3.3-4 Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis for Project Construction .............................73 3.7-1 Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................98 3.7-2 Estimated Annual Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions ............................................101 3.10-1 Anaheim General Plan, PTMLUP, and PTMU Overlay Zone Land Use Consistency Table ............................................................................................................133 3.12-1 Construction Equipment Maximum Noise Levels ...........................................................139 3.12-2 Construction Noise Model Results Summary ..................................................................140 3.12-3 Project-Related Traffic Noise (dBA CNEL)....................................................................143 3.16-1 Study Area Roadways and Intersections..........................................................................165 3.16-2 Committed and Proposed Development Projects ............................................................177 3.16-3 Existing (2015); Existing + Project (2015); Existing + Ambient + Cumulative (2018); and Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (2018) Roadway Segment Volume-to-Capacity Ratio and Levels of Service ............................................183 3.16-4 Existing & Existing + Project (2015) ICU-Based LOS ...................................................184 3.16-5 Existing + Ambient + Cumulative (2018) & Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (2018) ICU-Based LOS ....................................................................................185 3.16-6 Existing (2015) & Existing + Ambient + Project + Cumulative (2018) HCM- Based LOS .......................................................................................................................186 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 v May 2016 ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS Acronym/Abbreviation Definition AB Assembly Bill AFD Anaheim Fire Department AQMP Air Quality Management Plan BMP best management practice CAAQS California Ambient Air Quality Standards CalEEMod California Emissions Estimator Model Caltrans California Department of Transportation CARB California Air Resources Board CBC California Building Code CDFW California Department of Fish and Wildlife CEQA California Environmental Quality Act City City of Anaheim CNEL community noise equivalent level CO carbon monoxide CO2 carbon dioxide CO2E carbon dioxide equivalent CRPR California Rare Plant Rank dB decibel dBA A-weighted decibel EIR environmental impact report ESA Environmental Site Assessment FHWA Federal Highway Administration GHG greenhouse gas HCM Highway Capacity Manual HVAC heating, ventilation, and air conditioning I-5 Interstate 5 ICU Intersection Capacity Utilization Leq equivalent continuous sound level LOS level of service LST localized significance threshold MBTA Migratory Bird Treaty Act MM Mitigation Measure MT metric ton N2O nitrous oxide NAAQS National Ambient Air Quality Standards NAHC Native American Heritage Commission NO2 nitrogen dioxide NOx oxides of nitrogen NPDES National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 vi May 2016 Acronym/Abbreviation Definition O3 ozone OCSD Orange County Sanitation District PM10 particulate matter less than or equal to 10 micrometers in diameter PM2.5 particulate matter less than or equal to 2.5 microns in diameter PTIP Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan PTMLUP Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan PTMU Platinum Triangle Mixed Use RCNM Roadway Construction Noise Model REC recognized environmental condition RTP Regional Transportation Plan SCAB South Coast Air Basin SCAG Southern California Association of Governments SCAQMD South Coast Air Quality Management District SCS Sustainable Communities Strategy SEIR Subsequent Environmental Impact Report SEL Single Event Level SEMS Standardized Emergency Management System SR State Route SWPPP Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan TIS Traffic Impact Study USFWS U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service VOC volatile organic compound WQMP Water Quality Management Plan Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 1 May 2016 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Anaheim (City) received an application from Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. (project applicant) requesting approval of the following actions to allow for development of the Jefferson Stadium Park project (proposed project):  General Plan Amendments (GPA2015-000506)  Amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Amendments (MIS2015-00621)  Master Site Plan (MIS2015-00622)  Three Final Site Plans (FSP2015-00003, FSP2015-00004, FSP2015-00005)  Development Agreement (DAG2015-00002)  Tentative Parcel Map (SUBPM2015-174) The proposed project is the subject of analysis in this document pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15367, the City is the lead agency with principal responsibility for considering the proposed project for approval. This introduction will discuss: 1. The requirements of CEQA 2. The Draft and Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (herein referred to as SEIR No. 339 or SEIR) (State Clearinghouse No. 2004121045) certified by the City of Anaheim City Council for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project (City of Anaheim 2010a, 2010b) 3. The primary purpose of an addendum to a previously certified Environmental Impact Report (EIR) 4. The standards for adequacy of an addendum pursuant to the CEQA Guidelines 5. The format and content of this Addendum 6. The City’s processing requirements to consider the proposed project for approval 7. An explanation of the Environmental Checklist provided in Section 3 of this document 8. A summary of documents to be incorporated by reference and points of contact for the proposed project Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 2 May 2016 1.1 California Environmental Quality Act CEQA, a statewide environmental law contained in Public Resources Code Sections 21000– 21177, applies to most public agency decisions to carry out, authorize, or approve actions that have the potential to adversely affect the environment. The overarching goal of CEQA is to protect the physical environment. To achieve that goal, CEQA requires that public agencies identify the environmental consequences of their discretionary actions and consider alternatives and mitigation measures that could avoid or reduce significant adverse impacts when avoidance or reduction is feasible. It also gives other public agencies and the general public an opportunity to comment on the information. If significant adverse impacts cannot be avoided, reduced, or mitigated to below a level of significance, the public agency is required to prepare an EIR and balance the project’s environmental concerns with other goals and benefits in a statement of overriding considerations. 1.2 Project Summary The proposed project would involve construction and operation of a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; a 1.11-acre public park; on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated on- and off-site infrastructure improvements. 1.3 Purpose and Need The proposed project would help the City meet several of the project objectives identified in SEIR No. 339. These objectives include the following:  Provide for a wide range of housing opportunities in proximity to jobs and a regional transportation center.  Provide a mix of quality, high-density urban housing that is integrated into the area through carefully maintained pedestrian streets, transit connections, and arterial access.  Foster mixed-use development that serves to reduce vehicle miles traveled by promoting alternatives to driving, such as walking, biking, and use of mass transit.  Provide on-site open space and recreation amenities that further enhance the mixed-use environment of the area for both residents and employees working in the Platinum Triangle.  Encourage high-density mixed-use development that is synergistic with the entertainment and employment uses already established in the Platinum Triangle. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 3 May 2016  Allow for the continued development of the Platinum Triangle and accommodate future market demand through amendments to the General Plan and Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. 1.4 Project Background In October 2010, the City approved the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included the following discretionary approvals: 1. Platinum Triangle Water Supply Assessment 2. General Plan Amendment 3. Amendments to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) (City of Anaheim 2014), including the Platinum Triangle Standardized Development Agreement Form 4. Amendments to the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone 5. Zoning Reclassifications SEIR No. 339, which was prepared to evaluate the potential impacts of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, was certified by the Anaheim City Council on October 26, 2010. As a result of the land use approvals by the City, the development intensities of the PTMU Overlay Zone were increased to allow up to 18,909 residential units; 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses; 14,340,522 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. In addition to the increase in development intensity, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project also included upgrades to existing infrastructure to serve the proposed increased intensity of land uses. The upgrades included roadway improvements, sewer upgrades, two new water wells, a new electrical substation, natural gas infrastructure improvements, and an additional fire station. The City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element’s Table LU‐4 (City of Anaheim 2015), General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City, indicates the maximum development intensity for each of the land use designations permitted in the Platinum Triangle. As part of its certification of SEIR No. 339, the City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations to address significant and unavoidable environmental impacts that would result from implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. These unavoidable impacts are summarized in SEIR No. 339 Table 1-4, Summary of Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Level of Significance After Mitigation (Appendix A), and include impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, noise, and transportation and traffic. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 4 May 2016 To date, four addenda have been prepared to SEIR No. 339. The first addendum, dated April 17, 2012, was prepared in conjunction with the Katella Avenue/I‐5 Undercrossing Improvements project. The second addendum was approved in December 2012 in conjunction with a request to modify the Platinum Triangle intensity to allow up to 18,988 dwelling units; 4,795,111 square feet of commercial uses; 14,131,103 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. The third addendum was approved in October 2014 in conjunction with a request to modify the Platinum Triangle’s intensity to allow up to 19,027 dwelling units; 4,735,111 square feet of commercial uses; 14,131,103 square feet of office uses; and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. The forth addendum, dated August 2015, was prepared in conjunction with the Amended A-Town Metro Master Site Plan project. In 2007, the Anaheim City Council certified EIR No. 335 and approved a General Plan Amendment, PTMLUP Amendment, Zoning Code Amendment, Conditional Use Permit, Development Agreement, and Tentative Tract Map to permit development of up to 1,200 residential units, 100,000 square feet of office development, 50,000 square feet of commercial development, a 1.7-acre park, and buildings up to 300 feet in height on the project site. Subsequently, in 2010, the Anaheim City Council certified SEIR No. 339, which analyzed development of up to 1,200 residential units, 219,000 square feet of office development, 118,000 square feet of commercial development and a 1.7-acre park on the project site (see PTMLUP Appendix G, Gene Autry District Sub Area B). Although SEIR No. 339 analyzed more development intensity than entitled to the site by the Development Agreement approved in 2007, this additional intensity has not been legally entitled to the site through an amendment to the Development Agreement or a new Development Agreement. 1.5 CEQA Requirements for Preparation of an Addendum The CEQA Guidelines allow for updating and using a previously certified EIR for projects that have changed or are different from the previous project or conditions analyzed in the certified EIR. In cases where changes or additions occur with no new significant environmental impacts, an addendum to a previously certified EIR may be prepared, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. The following describes the requirements of an addendum, as defined by CEQA Guidelines Section 15164: A. The lead agency or responsible agency shall prepare an Addendum to a previously certified EIR if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a Subsequent EIR have occurred. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 5 May 2016 B. An Addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred. C. An Addendum need not be circulated for public review but can be included in or attached to the Final EIR. D. The decision‐making body shall consider the Addendum with the Final EIR prior to making a decision on the project. E. A brief explanation of the decision not to prepare a Subsequent EIR pursuant to Section 15162 should be included in an Addendum to an EIR, the lead agency’s findings on the project, or elsewhere in the record. The explanation must be supported by substantial evidence. CEQA Guidelines Section 15164(a) and (b) allow for the preparation of Subsequent EIR if none of the conditions described in Section 15162 are met. CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 describes the conditions under which a Subsequent EIR must be prepared, as follows: A. Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; B. Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken, which will require major revisions of the previous EIR due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or C. New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete, shows any of the following: 1. The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR; 2. Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; 3. Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible, and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternatives; or Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 6 May 2016 4. Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. If none of these circumstances are present, and only minor technical changes or additions are necessary to update the previously certified EIR, an addendum may be prepared, consistent with CEQA Guidelines Section 15164. As discussed in Section 1.7 and Section 3, none of the above circumstances that warrant preparation of a Subsequent EIR are present. 1.6 Type of CEQA Compliance Document and Level of Analysis This document is an addendum to the previously certified SEIR No. 339 for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. As such, this Addendum analyzes the potential differences between the impacts that would occur with implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project as disclosed in SEIR No. 339 and those that would be associated with the proposed project described in Section 2 of this document. CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(a) states that a Program EIR is appropriate for a series of actions that can be characterized as one large project and are related either: 1. Geographically; 2. A logical parts [sic] in the chain of contemplated actions; 3. In connection with issuance of rules, regulations, plans, or other general criteria to govern the conduct of a continuing program; or 4. As individual activities carried out under the same authorizing statutory or regulatory authority and having generally similar environmental effects which can be mitigated in similar ways. As discussed in Section 2, the proposed project analyzed herein involves approval of a Master Site Plan and other related discretionary and ministerial approvals to allow for development of a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; a 1.11-acre public park; on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated on-site and frontage infrastructure improvements. As addressed in Section 3.10, the proposed project is consistent with the development intensity contemplated in SEIR No. 339, and would generate similar environmental impacts as evaluated in the SEIR. Therefore, the project would not result in any of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a Subsequent EIR. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 7 May 2016 Additionally, as discussed in Section 3.10, the proposed project is consistent with the applicable goals, policies, and planning principles set forth in both the City of Anaheim General Plan and PTMLUP. The City applies the applicable General Plan and PTMLUP goals, objectives, policies, and actions to requests for approval of subsequent entitlements tiering off the program analyzed in SEIR No. 339. If the City finds that, pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15162, no new effects could occur and no new mitigation is required, the City can approve the activity as being within the scope of the SEIR. As such, the SEIR clearly anticipated environmental impacts associated with projects such as the proposed project, and, thus, SEIR No. 339 was intended to serve as the Program EIR to be used in preparing CEQA compliance documentation for future projects. CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c) states that subsequent activities undertaken pursuant to a Program EIR must be examined in light of the Program EIR to determine whether an additional environmental document must be prepared. Pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15168(c)(4), “Where the subsequent activities involve site specific operations, the agency should use a written checklist or similar device to document the evaluation of the site and the activity to determine whether the environmental effects of the operation were covered in the Program EIR.” This Addendum provides the environmental information necessary for the City to make an informed decision about the proposed project. The City has determined that an Addendum to SEIR No. 339 should be prepared, rather than a Supplemental or Subsequent EIR, based on the following facts: A. As demonstrated in the accompanying Environmental Checklist (see Section 3), the proposed project would not require major revisions to the previously certified SEIR No. 339 because the project would not result in any new significant impacts to the physical environment nor would it create substantial increases in the severity of the environmental impacts previously disclosed in the SEIR. B. Subsequent to the certification of SEIR No. 339, no substantial changes in the circumstances under which the proposed project would be undertaken occurred. C. Subsequent to the certification of SEIR No. 339, no new information of substantial importance has become available that was not known at the time SEIR No. 339 was prepared. D. The proposed project’s discretionary actions would not result in any new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts beyond those disclosed in SEIR No. 339. The reasonable consequence of the proposed project through approval of the various Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 8 May 2016 discretionary and ministerial actions would also not result in any new or substantially more severe significant environmental impacts beyond those disclosed in the SEIR. E. Subsequent to the certification of SEIR No. 339, no new mitigation measures or alternatives have been identified that were infeasible at the time the SEIR was certified and that would substantially reduce the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, noise, and transportation and traffic. F. Subsequent to the certification of SEIR No. 339, no new mitigation measures or alternatives that are considerably different from those analyzed in the SEIR have been identified to reduce the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project’s significant and unavoidable impacts to air quality, greenhouse gas emissions, land use and planning, noise, and transportation and traffic. G. Technical reports that evaluate the environmental impacts that could result from implementation of the proposed project were prepared for the subject areas of Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Appendix B), Biological Resources (Appendix C), Cultural Resources (Appendix D), Geology and Soils (Appendix E), Hazards and Hazardous Materials (Appendix F), Hydrology and Water Quality (Appendix G), Noise (Appendix H), Traffic (Appendix I), and Utilities and Service Systems (Appendix J). These technical reports do not identify any new impacts or substantial increases in impacts to the environment beyond what was disclosed in SEIR No. 339. H. The proposed project would comply with all applicable General Plan and PTMLUP goals, policies, and planning principles upon which SEIR No. 339 used to inform its impact conclusions. Based on these facts, the City determined that an addendum to the previously certified SEIR No. 339 is the appropriate type of CEQA document to prepare for the proposed project. The purpose of this Addendum is to evaluate the proposed project’s level of impact on the environment in comparison to the existing condition and approved Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project and its accompanying SEIR. 1.7 Format and Content of this Addendum The following components comprise this Addendum: A. Introduction (Section 1) and Project Description (Section 2). B. The completed Environmental Checklist and its associated analyses (Section 3), which conclude that the proposed project would not result in any new significant environmental Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 9 May 2016 impacts or substantially increase the severity of environmental impacts beyond the levels disclosed in SEIR No. 339. C. Technical reports and other documentation that evaluate the proposed project and/or project site, which are appended to this Addendum:  Appendix A: SEIR Summary of Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Level of Significance After Mitigation (Table 1-4 of Final SEIR No. 339)  Appendix B: California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) Air Pollutant and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling  Appendix C: Biological Resources  Appendix D: Cultural Resources Memorandum  Appendix E: Geotechnical Exploration Report  Appendix F: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment  Appendix G: Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan and Drainage Study  Appendix H: Noise Modeling  Appendix I: Traffic Impact Study  Appendix J: Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire and Domestic Water Service Study 1.8 Preparation and Processing of this Addendum The City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division, directed and supervised the preparation of this Addendum. Although prepared with assistance from the consulting firm Dudek, the content contained within and the conclusions drawn by this Addendum reflect the sole independent judgment of the City. The City of Anaheim Planning Commission will consider this Addendum to the previously certified SEIR No. 339 as the appropriate environmental document for the proposed project. The Planning Commission will hear public comment on the project and then make a recommendation to the City Council to either approve, approve with modifications, or deny approval of the Addendum and the proposed project. Following the public hearing before the Planning Commission and the Planning Commission’s recommendation, the City Council will hold a subsequent public hearing for the proposed project and either approve, approve with modifications, or deny approval of the Addendum and the proposed project. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 10 May 2016 1.9 Initial Study Checklist The City prepared the proposed project’s Environmental Checklist per CEQA Guidelines Sections 15063(d)(3) and 15168(c)(4). The CEQA Guidelines include a suggested checklist to indicate whether the conditions set forth in its Section 15162, which would require a Subsequent or Supplemental EIR, are met, and whether there would be new significant impacts resulting from the project not examined in SEIR No. 339. The checklist is found in Section 3 of this document. Following the checklist, Sections 3.1 through 3.18 include an explanation and discussion of each significance determination made in the checklist. For this Addendum, four possible responses to each of the individual environmental issue areas are included on the checklist: 1. New Significant Impact. This response is used to indicate when the proposed project has changed to such an extent that major revisions of SEIR No. 339 are required due to the presence of new significant environmental effects. 2. More Severe Impacts. This response is used to indicate when the circumstances under which the proposed project is undertaken have changed to such an extent that major revisions of SEIR No. 339 are required because the severity of previously identified significant effects would substantially increase. 3. New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact. This response is used to indicate when new information of substantial importance that was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time SEIR No. 339 was certified indicates that there are new mitigation measures or alternatives available to substantially reduce significant environmental impacts of the proposed project. 4. No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis. This response is used to indicate that the proposed project would not create a new impact or substantially increase the severity of the previously identified environmental impact disclosed in SEIR No. 339. The Environmental Checklist and accompanying explanation of checklist responses provide the information and analysis necessary to assess relative environmental impacts of the proposed project in the context of environmental impacts addressed in the previously certified SEIR No. 339. In doing so, the City will determine the extent of additional environmental review, if any, for the proposed project. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 11 May 2016 1.10 Existing Documents to be Incorporated by Reference CEQA Guidelines Sections 15150 and 15168(c)(3) and (d)(2) permit and encourage that an environmental document incorporate by reference other documents that provide relevant data. The City of Anaheim General Plan (City of Anaheim 2015), the Anaheim Municipal Code (City of Anaheim 2016), the Anaheim Zoning Code, PTMLUP, Draft and Final SEIR No. 339 and accompanying Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program, SEIR technical appendices, Findings and Statement of Facts, Statement of Overriding Considerations, and associated City Council Resolutions No. 2010-25, which are all herein incorporated by reference pursuant to CEQA Guidelines Section 15150, are available for review, as follows: City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 1.11 Points of Contact The lead agency for this environmental document is the City of Anaheim. Any questions about the preparation of this Initial Study and Addendum, its assumptions, or its conclusions should be referred to the following: Scott Koehm, Senior Planner City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 714.765.5395 skoehm@anaheim.net The point of contact for the project applicant is as follows: Rosie Cooper, Vice President and Development Manager Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 San Diego, California 92130 858.369.5682 rosie.cooper@jpi.com Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 12 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 13 May 2016 2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Project Location The project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Anaheim, which is in central Orange County (Figure 2-1). Regionally, the project site is located south of the City of Fullerton; west and north of the City of Orange; northeast of the City of Garden Grove; and southeast of the City of Buena Park. Interstate 5 (I-5) is located approximately 0.1 mile west of the project site; State Route (SR) 60 is approximately 0.65 mile to the east, SR-22 is approximately 1.3 miles south of the site, and SR-91 is located approximately 3.8 miles to the north. The approximately 17.57-gross-acre (16.85 net acres), rectangular-shaped project site consists of a single parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-290-88). The street address associated with the project site is 1800 East Gene Autry Way. The project site is bound by East Gene Autry Way to the north; South State College Boulevard to the east; Artisan Court, the Anavia Apartment community, and various commercial/office uses to the south; and a mix of commercial/industrial uses to the west (Figure 2-2). Both Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard provide direct regional access to I-5. The City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element’s Figure LU-4, General Plan Program, designates the majority of the project site as Mixed-Use, with smaller portions of the site designated as Parks (Figure 2-3) (City of Anaheim 2015). The City of Anaheim Zoning Map classifies the project site as Industrial (I) (Figure 2-4). Additionally, the project site is within both the PTMU Overlay Zone (Figure 2-3) and Sub-Area B of the Gene Autry Development District within the PTMLUP (Figure 2-5). 2.2 Environmental Setting Project Site The project site currently consists of vacant land. Over the last few years, isolated stockpiles of crushed concrete, asphalt, and soils have been present on the project site, remnants of the previous buildings, parking lots, drive aisles, and associated improvements that once existed on site. Aside from these stockpiles and remnant parking lots and drive aisles, land cover found on the project site is limited to ornamental trees found generally along the project frontages, and ruderal grassland vegetation within the footprints of the former buildings. The project site is relatively flat with the existing ground surface at an elevation of between approximately 143 and 146 feet above mean sea level. The majority of the site presently drains via ribbon gutters in a westerly and then northerly direction to a catch basin within the northwest corner Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 14 May 2016 of the property, ultimately discharging into Gene Autry Way. The balance of the project site drains via ribbon gutters in an easterly direction and ultimately discharges to State College Boulevard. The project site was historically used for agricultural purposes from circa the 1930s until the mid-1970s, following which the site was developed with nine commercial/industrial buildings. A railroad spur was located adjacent to the southern project boundary, and was likely present from the 1930s until the 1980s. In the mid-2000s, eight of the nine on-site buildings were demolished, with the ninth building demolished in 2013. The project site has been completely vacant since 2013. Surrounding Land Uses The project site is located in a mixed-use residential/office/commercial/industrial area of the City. Adjoining properties include the following:  North: Gene Autry Way bounds the project site to the north, beyond which is the Southern California Gas Company facility, a commercial/industrial building, and vacant land.  East: State College Road bounds the project site to the east, beyond which is the Angel Stadium of Anaheim property.  South: Artisan Court partially bounds the project site to the south, beyond which is the Anavia apartment community and office buildings.  West: Commercial/industrial buildings bound the project site to the west. 2.3 Jefferson Stadium Park Project The proposed project consists of a three-phase (Phases I, II, and III), master-planned, mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; a 1.11-acre public park; on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated on-site and frontage infrastructure improvements (Figure 2-6). Phase I (also referred to herein as Building 1, the westernmost building) of the proposed project would consist of a 370-unit, five-story wrap apartment building. Phase II (also referred to herein as Building 2, the middle building) would consist of a mixed-use, five-story wrap community with 376 units, including 12 live/work units. Phase III (also referred to herein as Building 3, the easternmost building) would consist of a mixed-use, four-story podium building with 333 units and 9,800 square feet of retail. Dwelling units would range between approximately 584-square- foot studio apartments to 1,348-square-foot, two-bedroom apartments. Carlsbad V Camp Pendleton South Oceanside B Camp Pendleton North Fallb San Clemente Dana Point San Juan Capistrano Laguna Niguel Laguna Hills Coto De Caza Newport Beach Mission Viejo Trabuco Highlands El Toro Costa Mesa Irvine Huntington Beach Tustin Santa Ana Seal Beach Tustin Foothills Garden Grove Los Alamitos Orange Anaheim Buena Park Placentia Yorba LindaFullerton Brea Per Corona March AFBWoodcrest Norco M V Pedley Mira Loma Riverside Rubidoux Glen Avon Wildomar Lake Elsinore Rancho Palos Verdes Palos Verdes Estates Lakewood Torrance Carson Long Beach CerritosRedondo Beach BellflowerGardenaCompton El SegundoHawthorne Norwalk South Gate Downey Santa Fe Springs VernonCulver City Hacienda Heights Santa Monica Diamond Bar East Los Angeles Industry Walnut Beverly Hills CovinaAlhambra Pomona Claremont La Verne Glendora Fernando Valley Santa Clarita West Covina Irwindale Burbank DuarteMonrovia Altadena Pasadena La Canada Flintridge Glendale Acton Chino Hills Chino Loma LindaBloomingtonMontclairColton Upland Rancho Cucamonga Fontana Rialto San Bernardino H Crestline L Arro Hesperia Fountain Valley Westminster Cypress La Habra Manhattan Beach La Mirada South Whittier Inglewood La Habra Heights Rowland HeightsWhittier Commerce Pico Rivera Montebello Monterey Park Rosemead El Monte San Gabriel San DimasBaldwin Park Temple City San Marino AzusaArcadia Los Angeles L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Orange County S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y Los Angeles County S Oran ge County San Diego CountyPacific Ocean 47 118 55 241 126 142 187 206 170 78 134 213 76 133 173 71 57 22 73 83 18 14 91 39 19 66 1 138 60 74 2 101 395 710 215 5 105 110 10 405 210 15 5 Regional Map Jefferson Stadium Park Project Da t e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 1 _ R e g i o n a l M a p . m x d 0105Miles FIGURE 2-1 Project Site Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 16 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Vicinity Map Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Bing Maps (Accessed 2016) Da t e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 2 _ V i c i n i t y M a p . m x d 0 2,0001,000 Feetn Project Boundary FIGURE 2-2 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 18 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK General Plan Land Use Designations Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Bing Maps (Accessed 2016), City of Anaheim (2014) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 3 _ G e n e r a l P l a n L a n d U s e M a p . m x d 0 1,500750Feetn Platinum Triangle Project Boundary Land Use Designation Mixed Use Office - Low Office - High Industrial Institutional Open Space FIGURE 2-3 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 20 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Zoning Classifications Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Bing Maps (Accessed 2016), City of Anaheim GIS (2011-2015) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 4 _ Z o n i n g M a p . m x d 0 1,500750Feetn Platinum Triangle Project Boundary Zoning Classification General Commercial High Intensity Office Low Intensity Office Industrial Public Recreational Semi-Public Transition FIGURE 2-4 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 22 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Sub-Area B Sub-Area CSub-Area A Gene Autry District Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Bing Maps (Accessed 2016), City of Anaheim GIS (2008) Da t e : 4 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 5 _ G e n e A u t r y D i s t r i c t . m x d FIGURE 2-5 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 24 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Site Plan Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Architects Orange (2015) Da t e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 6 _ S i t e P l a n . m x d FIGURE 2-6 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 26 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 27 May 2016 Each live/work unit would consists of commercial and residential space. The commercial portion would be located on the ground floor fronting Gene Autry Way and would be accessed from a storefront adjacent to the street. The residential portion would be on the second floor and would be accessed through an entry door in the building breezeway or an interior stairwell located in the rear of the commercial space. The stairwell would be equipped with a lockable door, allowing for the residential space to be secured independent of the ground-floor commercial space. The exterior elevations of all three buildings would be distinctly different but would have complementary styles. Phase I would be a large-form, grid-style building employing large color blocking and varying window sizes and patterns (Figure 2-7A). The architectural style of Phase II would be that of an urban city center, employing patterns of glazing and layering of panel elements with horizontal and vertical color and material blocking to provide a varying contemporary scheme (Figure 2-7B). The facade of Phase III, the closest building to the adjacent Angel Stadium of Anaheim, is influenced by a sports theme, with movement and rhythm on the exterior building expressed with vertical stairway elements and details (Figure 2-7C). A strong corner element would be developed at Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard, providing an attractive entry and retail plaza into the entire development. Public Park An approximately 1.11-acre public park would be constructed within the southern portion of the project site (Figure 2-8). The park was designed for active use by both the proposed project’s residents and the surrounding community. The park would include shaded bench and table seating, a basketball court, bocce ball courts, outdoor workout equipment, and passive gathering areas with turf and shade trees. A sizable dog park is planned for the southern portion of the park, providing residents and the general public a place to gather while giving their pets an opportunity to exercise and socialize. On-Site Access, Circulation, and Parking The proposed project would be accessible to vehicles via two future access points provided from Gene Autry Way. These project entrances would connect to the future Union Street and future Private Street (Figure 2-6), which would be constructed between Phase I and Phase II and between Phase II and Phase III, respectively. The future Union Street, between Gene Autry Way and the southern project boundary, is designated to be constructed to Connector Street standards, with one through-lane in each direction, undivided, with an ultimate right-of-way range of 46 feet to 68 feet, depending on whether optional street parking is provided. Union Street is essential to providing access and Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 28 May 2016 circulation for the proposed project, and would be constructed from Gene Autry Way to the south property limit and be signalized at the intersection of Union Street and Gene Autry Way. The future Private Street would parallel Union Street, connecting Gene Autry Way with Artisan Court. The intersection of Private Street and Gene Autry Way would be restricted to right- in/right-out turning movements and would not be signalized. In addition to the two project entrances from Gene Autry Way, the proposed project would also be accessible to vehicles via the existing signalized intersection of Artisan Court and State College Boulevard. Currently, Artisan Court consists of a two-lane, 580-foot-long roadway segment located between the southern project boundary and the Anavia apartment community. Adequate right-of-way is presently not provided to connect this existing segment of Artisan Court with the southernmost end of the future Union Street. Sufficient right-of-way along the southern project boundary to allow for future completion of this connection (Figure 2-6) would ultimately be dependent on the future redevelopment of the property located immediately south of the project site and directly east of the Anavia apartment community. Phase I would provide 622 parking spaces. An additional 647 parking spaces (611 for the residential units and 36 for the live/work units) would be included for Phase II. Phase III would provide 614 parking spaces (560 for the residential units and 54 for the retail space). The total number of parking spaces at project completion would be 1,792 parking spaces for the 1,067 non-live/work residential units, 36 parking spaces for the live/work units, and 54 parking spaces for the 9,800 square feet of retail space. Adjacent Street and Traffic Improvements The Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan (PTIP) describes mandatory roadway improvements to be constructed in the Platinum Triangle, including “Gene Autry Way Project 4A,” consisting of the segment of Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College Boulevard, and “State College Boulevard Project 2A,” consisting of the segment of State College Boulevard from Orangewood Avenue to just south of Katella Avenue. According to the PTIP, Gene Autry Way would require right-of-way dedication of 4.5 feet to create a 57.5-foot half right-of-way width along the project frontage. Prior to the intersection with State College Boulevard, Gene Autry Way would transition to a 62.5-foot-wide right-of- way, which would require a right-of-way dedication of 9.5 feet. To the west of the transition, Gene Autry Way would require roadway widening of 11 feet to create a 43-foot half roadway width. East of the transition, roadway widening of 16 feet would be required to create a 48-foot half roadway width. Architectural Elevations Phase I Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Architects Orange (2016) Da t e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 7 A _ A r c h E l e v a t i o n s P h a s e I . m x d FIGURE 2-7A Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 30 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Architectural Elevations Phase II Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Architects Orange (2016) Da t e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 7 B _ A r c h E l e v a t i o n s P h a s e I I . m xd FIGURE 2-7B Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 32 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Architectural Elevations Phase III Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Architects Orange (2016) Da t e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 7 C _ A r c h E l e v a t i o n s P h a s e I I I . mxd FIGURE 2-7C Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 34 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Public Park Plan Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: GMP (2016) Da t e : 4 / 1 2 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 8 _ P u b l i c P a r k P l a n . m x d FIGURE 2-8 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 36 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 37 May 2016 Per the PTIP, State College Boulevard would require right-of-way dedication of 12 feet to create a 72-foot half right-of-way width along the project frontage. State College Boulevard would require roadway widening of 16 feet to create a 59-foot half roadway width. A signal modification would be required at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way to accommodate the new traffic lane configurations. Right-of-way dedication and roadway widening on Artisan Court along the project frontage would vary due to varying existing right-of-way and roadway dimensions. The proposed northerly half right-of-way would transition from 31 feet from centerline to northerly property line along the westerly segment of the street to 36 feet along the easterly segment of the street. The roadway would transition from 13 feet from centerline to northerly curb face along the westerly segment of the street to 23 feet prior to the intersection with State College Boulevard. Parallel parking stalls would also be provided along the project frontage. Union Street would require right-of-way dedication ranging from 46 feet wide near the southerly property line to 68 feet wide prior to the intersection with Gene Autry Way, inclusive of a roadway width transitioning from 26 feet near the southerly property line to 40 feet prior to the intersection with Gene Autry Way. Parallel parking stalls would be provided on the westerly side of Union Street near the intersection with Gene Autry Way. Based on the recommendations of the Traffic Impact Study prepared for the proposed project (Appendix I), the following project design features would be implemented on and/or adjacent to the project site concurrent with project construction. Similar to all other design features incorporated by the proposed project, the following improvements would be designed and constructed in accordance with all applicable City standards:  Construct Union Street from Gene Autry Way to the southern end of the project site.  Construct Private Street from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court, parallel to Union Street, and restrict access to Gene Autry Way to right-in/right-out turning movements only.  Complete Artisan Court street improvements on the project site side from State College Boulevard to its present westernmost terminus.  Construct the intersection of Gene Autry Way and Union Street for future traffic signalization, and participate in the “fair share” cost of constructing a new traffic signal.  Widen Gene Autry Way to ultimate standards along the project frontage.  Prior to completion of the proposed project, widen State College Boulevard to ultimate standards from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 38 May 2016  Provide various traffic controls, including signage, striping, and pavement marking, to provide safe and efficient vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle movement through and within the project site. The proposed geometric configuration and striping for mandatory and voluntary street improvements to Gene Autry Way; Union Street (new); Artisan Court (widening the north side of street); the private north/south street (new); and State College Boulevard (widening) are shown in Figures 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33 of the Traffic Impact Study (Appendix I), respectively. The details of the street improvement plans may be modified prior to issuance of building permits subject to the approval of the City Engineer. Landscaping Consistent with Chapter 4, Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program, of the PTMLUP, as well as Chapter 10.19, Landscape Water Efficiency, of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the proposed project would install landscape areas throughout the project site and along Gene Autry Way, State College Boulevard, and Artisan Court. These landscape areas would incorporate a complementary mix of water-efficient trees, shrubs, flowering plants, and groundcover. Per the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, plants would be selected based on their ability to promote a consistent landscape aesthetic while also demonstrating adaptability to the climatic, geologic, and topographical conditions of the project site (City of Anaheim 2016). Where feasible, recycled water would be used to irrigate landscaped areas. Stormwater and Infrastructure Improvements A Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (Appendix G) was prepared for the proposed project. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the County of Orange National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) Stormwater Program. As discussed in the WQMP, on-site water quality and stormwater drainage would be addressed through incorporation of a series of infiltration, structural, and non-structural source-control best management practices (BMPs). Specifically, a new stormwater drainage and treatment system would be constructed within the project site. Under post-development conditions, stormwater would be collected within the storm drain system by roof drains, area drains, and/or drop inlets. As part of the hydrological modeling, the project site was divided into 14 drainage management areas. Within each drainage management area, the low stormwater flows would be routed to a perforated corrugated steel pipe for infiltration, and the high flows would bypass the treatment system and discharge off-site into the municipal storm drain system. Stormwater runoff from paved parking area would pass Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 39 May 2016 through either modular wetland units or Contech StormFilter media vaults for pretreatment prior to infiltration. Runoff within the public park would be directed to infiltration basins. Stormwater runoff from the disturbed right-of-way areas would be directed into the parkways and infiltrated with bioretention planters. 2.4 Construction and Phasing Construction of Phase I and Phase II of the proposed project would begin in December 2016, with completion of these buildings by February 2019. Construction activities associated with Phase III would commence in February 2018, and would end in September 2020. Construction activity phases would include demolition and removal of the existing remnant improvements; site preparation, including clearing and grubbing; rough and fine grading; utility trenching; building construction; application of architectural coatings; and paving of the parking areas. For a comprehensive list of construction assumptions, refer to the CalEEMod criteria air pollutant modeling worksheets included as Appendix B of this document. Prior to and during construction activities, various project design features and BMPs would be implemented in accordance with applicable federal, state, and City requirements, including the following:  The proposed project would be designed to comply with the mandatory reduction in indoor water usage contained in the incumbent California Green Building Standards (CalGreen) Code and any mandated reduction in outdoor water usage contained in the City’s requirements related to water efficient landscaping.  South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) Rule 403, Fugitive Dust, requires construction activities to implement best available control measures for sources of fugitive dust to prevent all forms of visible particulate matter from crossing the project boundary onto adjacent properties.  SCAQMD Rule 1113, Architectural Coatings, requires low volatile organic compound paints (no more than 150 grams per liter of volatile organic compounds) and/or high- pressure/low-volume applications be used during application of architectural coatings.  Grading activities would be performed in conformance with the latest version (currently 2013) of the California Building Code (CBC) (California Building Standards Commission 2013); Chapter 17.04, Grading, Excavations, Fills, Watercourses, of the Anaheim Municipal Code; approved grading plans; and good engineering practices. On- site and off-site stormwater drainage facilities and project site grading would be designed and constructed per the approved grading plans to prevent undue erosion and excessive Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 40 May 2016 deposits of mud, silt, and debris upon or within any public street, stormwater channel, storm drain, swale, or watercourse.  Since construction activities would disturb one or more acres, the proposed project would be subject to the provisions of the NPDES General Construction Activity Storm Water Permit (General Construction Permit). Construction activities subject to this permit include clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling and excavating. The General Construction Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Typically, a SWPPP contains a site map showing the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, stormwater collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways. The SWPPP must also include project construction features designed to prevent erosion and protect the quality of stormwater runoff (i.e., BMPs). Sediment control BMPs may include stabilized construction entrances, straw wattles on embankments, and sediment filters on existing inlets. Additionally, the SWPPP must contain a visual monitoring program; a chemical monitoring program for “non-visible” pollutants, should any of the BMPs fail; and a sediment monitoring plan.  The proposed project would be designed and constructed in accordance with applicable requirements set forth in the latest version (currently 2013) of the CBC (California Building Standards Commission 2013), as adopted by the City in Section 15.03.010, Adoption of Building Standard Code, in the Anaheim Municipal Code. In addition, all aspects of design and construction of the proposed project would meet the standards established during final engineering and would adhere to applicable recommendations outlined in a site-specific geotechnical/soils report (Appendix E).  Section 6.70.010, Established, of the Anaheim Municipal Code, limits the generation of noise from construction activities to the hours between 7 a.m. and 7 p.m. Should construction of the proposed project be required to occur outside of this time frame, the project applicant would need to seek approval from the Director of Public Works or Building Official.  Landscape areas installed throughout the project site and along Gene Autry Way, State College Boulevard, and Artisan Court would incorporate a complementary mix of water- efficient trees, shrubs, flowering plants, and groundcover. Chapter 10.19, Landscape Water Efficiency, of the Anaheim Municipal Code requires plants to be selected based on their ability to promote a consistent landscape aesthetic while also demonstrating adaptability to the climatic, geologic, and topographical conditions of the project site (City of Anaheim 2016). Where feasible, recycled water would be used to irrigate landscaped areas. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 41 May 2016  In compliance with both the Migratory Bird Treaty Act of 1918 (MBTA) and the California Fish and Game Code, the proposed project would be conditioned by the City so that any disturbance to existing landscape trees, including trimming, pruning, or removing, would occur outside of the nesting season. In the event that such disturbance is deemed necessary during the nesting season, measures to reduce potential impacts to nesting birds would be incorporated as a condition of approval. These measures would be determined by the City, likely in consultation with wildlife professionals, but may include such measures as pre-construction clearance surveys and/or avoidance of active nests until juvenile birds have fledged.  Consistent with existing regulatory requirements outlined in 14 California Code of Regulations 15064.5(f) and Public Resources Code Section 20182, in the event that archaeological resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find would immediately stop until a qualified archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether or not additional study is warranted. Depending on the significance of the find under CEQA, the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted.  In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the County Coroner would immediately be notified of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains would occur until the County Coroner has determined, within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, he or she would notify the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descendent from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendent must complete his/her inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 42 May 2016 2.5 Project Approvals The following discretionary actions would be required to implement the proposed project. This list is preliminary, and may not be comprehensive:  General Plan Amendment (GPA2015-00506): To relocate and combine two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use  Amendment to the PTMLUP (MIS2015-00621): To reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments  Master Site Plan (MIS2015-00622)  Three Final Site Plans (FSP2015-00003, FSP2015-00004, FSP2015-00005)  Development Agreement (DAG2015-00002)  Tentative Parcel Map (SUBPM2015-174) Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 43 May 2016 3 INITIAL STUDY CHECKLIST Project title: Jefferson Stadium Park (Development Project No. 2015-00078) Lead agency name and address: City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Contact: Scott Koehm, Senior Planner 714.765.5395 skoehm@anaheim.net Project location: The project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Anaheim, which is in central Orange County (Figure 2-1). Regionally, the project site is located south of the City of Fullerton; west and north of the City of Orange; northeast of the City of Garden Grove; and southeast of the City of Buena Park. I-5 is located approximately 0.1 mile west of the project site; SR-60 is approximately 0.65 mile to the east; SR-22 is approximately 1.3 miles south of the site; and SR- 91 is located approximately 3.8 miles to the north. The approximately 17.57-gross-acre (16.85 net acres), rectangular-shaped project site consists of a single parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-290-88). The street address associated with the project site is 1800 East Gene Autry Way. The project site is bound by East Gene Autry Way to the north; South State College Boulevard to the east; Artisan Court, the Anavia apartment community, and various commercial/office uses to the south; and a mix of commercial/industrial uses to the west (Figure 2-2). Project sponsor’s name and address: Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 San Diego, California 92130 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 44 May 2016 General plan designation: Mixed-Use and Open Space-Parks Zoning: Industrial (I) Zone and Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone Description of project. (Describe the whole action involved, including but not limited to later phases of the project, and any secondary, support, or off-site features necessary for its implementation. Attach additional sheets if necessary): Refer to Section 2 for a detailed project description. Surrounding land uses and setting (Briefly describe the project’s surroundings): The project site is located in a mixed-use residential/office/commercial/industrial area of the City. Adjoining properties include the following:  North: Gene Autry Way bounds the project site to the north, beyond which is the Southern California Gas Company facility, a commercial/industrial building, and vacant land.  East: State College Road bounds the project site to the east, beyond which is the Angel Stadium of Anaheim property.  South: Artisan Court partially bounds the project site to the south, beyond which is the Anavia apartment community and office buildings.  West: Commercial/industrial buildings bound the project site to the west. Other public agencies whose approval is required (e.g., permits or participation agreement):  Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board: NPDES General Construction Permit  Anaheim Fire Department (AFD): Site plan approval  Anaheim Police Department: Site plan approval  Anaheim Public Works Department, Engineering Services Division: Site, grading, and circulation plan approval; issuance of encroachment permit  Anaheim Public Utilities: Wet and dry utility plan approval Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 45 May 2016 ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS POTENTIALLY AFFECTED The environmental factors checked below would be potentially affected by this project, involving at least one impact that is a “Potentially Significant Impact,” as indicated by the checklist on the following pages. Aesthetics Agriculture and Forestry Resources Air Quality Biological Resources Cultural Resources Geology and Soils Greenhouse Gas Emissions Hazards and Hazardous Materials Hydrology and Water Quality Land Use and Planning Mineral Resources Noise Population and Housing Public Services Recreation Transportation and Traffic Utilities and Service Systems Mandatory Findings of Significance Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 46 May 2016 DETERMINATION: On the basis of this initial evaluation: I find that the proposed project COULD NOT have a significant effect on the environment, and a NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect in this case because revisions in the project have been made by or agreed to by the project proponent. A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION will be prepared. I find that the proposed project MAY have a significant effect on the environment, and an ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required. I find that the proposed project MAY have a “potentially significant impact” or “potentially significant unless mitigated” impact on the environment, but at least one effect (1) has been adequately analyzed in an earlier document pursuant to applicable legal standards, and (2) has been addressed by mitigation measures based on the earlier analysis as described on attached sheets. An ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT is required, but it must analyze only the effects that remain to be addressed. I find that although the proposed project could have a significant effect on the environment, because all potentially significant effects (a) have been analyzed adequately in an earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION pursuant to applicable standards, and (b) have been avoided or mitigated pursuant to that earlier ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT or NEGATIVE DECLARATION, including revisions or mitigation measures that are imposed upon the proposed project, nothing further is required. Signature Date Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 47 May 2016 EVALUATION OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS: New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis I. AESTHETICS – Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? II. AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non- agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? III. AIR QUALITY – Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 48 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? IV. BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 49 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis V. CULTURAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? VI. GEOLOGY AND SOILS – Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 50 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis VII. GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS – Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? VIII. HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS – Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? d) Be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? IX. HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY – Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 51 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? X. LAND USE AND PLANNING – Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 52 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis XI. MINERAL RESOURCES – Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally- important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? XII. NOISE – Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? XIII. POPULATION AND HOUSING – Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 53 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis XIV. PUBLIC SERVICES a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Police protection? Schools? Parks? Other public facilities? XV. RECREATION a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? XVI. TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC – Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 54 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis e) Result in inadequate emergency access? f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? XVII. UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS – Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? XVIII. MANDATORY FINDINGS OF SIGNIFICANCE a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 55 May 2016 New Significant Impact More Severe Impacts New Ability to Substantially Reduce Significant Impact No Substantial Change from Previous Analysis b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? 3.1 Aesthetics a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found no impacts associated with scenic vistas would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Generally, scenic vistas are associated with natural landforms such as mountains, foothills, ridgelines, and coastlines. The City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element identifies the Santa Ana River, the Hill and Canyon Area, and open space areas as scenic resources in the City. Additionally, the General Plan Green Element lists the Hill and Canyon Area, the Santa Ana Mountains, golf courses, and the Santa Ana River as important visual resources that provide visual relief from the built environment (City of Anaheim 2015). The project site is located in a highly urbanized, mixed-use area of the City. The Santa Ana River is located along the eastern boundary of the Platinum Triangle, but none of the scenic vistas identified above, including those scenic resources specifically discussed in the General Plan, are located in the broader project area. Due to the existing development that occurs in the project area, prominent views of any scenic vistas located within or around the City, including the Santa Ana River and the Hill and Canyon Area, are limited within the project vicinity. As further discussed in Section 3.1(c), the proposed project Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 56 May 2016 would be consistent with the character of both the project area and surrounding land uses, and the project would be of similar size, scale, and height as other adjacent land uses. Because of the considerable distance between the project site and the nearest scenic vistas, and due to the extensive amount of intervening development between the proposed project and any significant scenic resource, the project would not adversely affect views of or from local or regional scenic vistas. Therefore, no impacts associated with scenic vistas would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project substantially damage scenic resources including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a state scenic highway? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with state scenic highways would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The closest Officially Designated State Scenic Highway to the project site is the segment of SR-91 between SR-55 to the City’s easternmost limit (Caltrans 2011). This roadway segment is located approximately 4.75 miles northeast of the project site. Due to the considerable distance between the project site and this segment of SR-91, and because of the extensive amount of intervening development between the proposed project and this roadway segment, the project would not be located within the viewshed of this Officially Designated State Scenic Highway. Therefore, no impacts associated with state scenic highways would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with visual character and quality to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measure 1-1. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Under the existing conditions, the project site consists of vacant land. Over the last few years, isolated stockpiles of crushed concrete, asphalt, and soils have been present on the Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 57 May 2016 project site, likely the remnants of the previous buildings, parking lots, drive aisles, and associated improvements that once occurred on site. Aside from these stockpiles and remnant parking lots and drive aisles, land cover found on the project site is limited to ornamental trees found generally along the project frontages and ruderal grassland vegetation within the footprints of the former buildings. Collectively, these features presently located on the project site form a non-cohesive visual setting. The proposed project would incorporate similar architectural elements, including a complementary color palette and a variety of building materials, to other land uses in the project area, thereby mirroring existing nearby development. The proposed project was designed to include vertical and horizontal elements that would break up the overall massing of the buildings and provide visual interest. Parkway and setback landscape areas along Gene Autry Way, State College Boulevard, and Artisan Court would also soften views of the project site and enhance the visual character of the proposed project. The exterior elevations of all three buildings would be distinctly different but of complementary styles. Phase I would be a large-form, grid-style building employing large color blocking and varying window sizes and patterns (Figure 2-7A). The architectural style of Phase II would be that of an urban city center, employing patterns of glazing and layering of panel elements with horizontal and vertical color and material blocking to provide a varying contemporary scheme (Figure 2-7B). The facade of Phase III, the closest building to the adjacent Angel Stadium of Anaheim, is influenced by a sports theme, with movement and rhythm on the exterior building expressed with vertical stairway elements and details (Figure 2-7C). A strong corner element would be developed at Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard, providing an attractive entry and retail plaza into the entire development. The maximum building heights of the proposed project would be limited to less than 90 feet, which is substantially lower than the 300‐foot residential towers that were associated with the previously approved project and analyzed in SEIR No. 339. Because the maximum building heights of the proposed project would be substantially lower than currently permitted in the project area and analyzed in the SEIR, the potential shade and shadow effects on adjacent properties and structures would be less severe than structures that would reach up to 300 feet high, as evaluated in the SEIR. Nonetheless, Mitigation Measure 1-1 in the SEIR requires property owners/developers to demonstrate that their projects would not preclude shadow sensitive receptors’ exposure to natural sunlight for at least 50% of the season for at least 50% of the shade-sensitive area. Due to the proposed project’s shorter maximum building heights, potential shade and shadow Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 58 May 2016 impacts to adjacent properties would be reduced when compared to those effects analyzed in the SEIR. To ensure that both current and future development in the Platinum Triangle and the City is designed and constructed to be visually compatible with the character of surrounding areas and land uses, the PTMLUP and the Anaheim Zoning Code include design standards related to building size, height, setback, and materials, as well as landscaping, signage, and other aesthetic considerations. These provisions help ensure that adjacent land uses are visually consistent with one another and their surroundings, and help to reduce the potential for aesthetic conflict. Design plans for all development proposals submitted to the City are reviewed for compliance with the Zoning Code. If located in the Platinum Triangle, these design plans are also reviewed for adherence to the PTMLUP. As part of the City’s review process, the proposed project’s architectural elevations and plans will be reviewed, at a minimum, by City staff and the Planning Commission to ensure that the proposed project conforms to the PTMLUP and the Zoning Code, and promotes the overall visual character of the project area. Therefore, impacts associated with visual character and quality would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. d) Would the project create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with light and glare to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Similar to other existing land uses in the Platinum Triangle, the proposed project would require nighttime lighting for safety and security. This lighting would be installed throughout the project site, including at residential buildings, retail uses, and the public park. Section 18.20.160, Compatibility Standards, of the Anaheim Zoning Code establishes exterior lighting standards in the Platinum Triangle, stating “Outdoor lighting associated with commercial uses shall not adversely impact surrounding residential uses, but shall provide sufficient illumination for access and security purposes. Such lighting shall not blink, flash or oscillate” (City of Anaheim 2016). Exterior lighting associated with the proposed project would be required to comply with these provisions. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 59 May 2016 To avoid fugitive light impacts, exterior lighting would be shielded with hoods, filtering louvers, glare reducers, or other means to maintain adequate lighting throughout the area without undue nighttime glare impacts on adjoining residential areas. Additionally, because of the inclusion of parking garages within the buildings, lighting impacts traditionally associated with surface parking lots (e.g., tall light standards, vehicle headlights) would be generally contained within the interior of the building and would not substantially affect nearby sensitive receptors. Therefore, impacts associated with light and glare would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.1.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measure (MM) related to aesthetics, which is applicable to the proposed project: MM 1-1 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan application, where adjacent uses are deemed to be shadow sensitive (e.g., residential, recreational, and pedestrian areas), the property owner/developer for future development projects shall demonstrate that the Proposed Project would not preclude shadow sensitive receptors’ exposure to natural sunlight for at least 50 percent of duration for the season, for at least 50 percent of the shade-sensitive area, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. 3.2 Agriculture and Forestry Resources a) Would the project convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with the conversion of Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, and Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland) (collectively referred to herein as “Important Farmland”) would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. According to the California Department of Conservation’s California Important Farmland Finder, the project site and the surrounding area are identified as “Urban and Built-Up Land.” No Importance Farmland is located in the immediate project area (California Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 60 May 2016 Department of Conservation 2014). Therefore, no impacts associated with conversion of Important Farmland would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found no impacts associated with existing zoning for agricultural use and Williamson Act contracts would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. A review of the Anaheim Zoning Map found that neither the project site nor any parcel in the surrounding area is zoned for agricultural use. Additionally, per the California Department of Conservation’s Agricultural Preserves 2004: Williamson Act Parcels Map, no parcels under a Williamson Act contract are located in the project area (California Department of Conservation 2004). The nearest such parcels are located several miles from the project site in and around the cities of Rancho Santa Margarita and San Juan Capistrano, as well as in the unincorporated area of North Tustin. Therefore, no impacts associated with agricultural zoning or a Williamson Act contract would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned Timberland Production would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project site is located in a heavily urbanized, mixed-use area of the City surrounded by extensive existing development. The project site contains only ornamental landscape trees and ruderal grassland vegetation, and no forested areas are located in the broader project area. Therefore, no impacts associated with forestland, timberland, or timberland zoned as Timberland Production would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 61 May 2016 d) Would the project result in the loss of forestland or conversion of forestland to non- forest use? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with the loss or conversion of forestland would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.2(c). e) Would the project involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with the conversion of Important Farmland and forest land would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to responses in Sections 3.2(a) through 3.2(d). 3.2.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to agriculture or forestry resources. 3.3 Air Quality The following analysis is based, in part, on the March 2016 CalEEMod criteria air pollutant emissions modeling conducted by Dudek and included as Appendix B of this document. a) Would the project conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that impacts associated with the potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD) 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) (which was the applicable air quality plan at the time of certification of the SEIR) would be less than significant. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 62 May 2016 Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project is located within the South Coast Air Basin (SCAB), which includes all of Orange County and the non-desert portions of Los Angeles, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties, and is within the jurisdictional boundaries of the SCAQMD. In December 2012, the SCAQMD adopted the Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan (SCAQMD 2013), which is designed to meet applicable federal and state requirements for ozone (O3) and particulate matter with an aerodynamic diameter equal to or less than 2.5 microns (PM2.5). The 2012 AQMP was approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) on January 25, 2013, and the portions of the AQMP that address the O3 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) were approved by the United States Environmental Protection Agency on September 3, 2014. Emissions that would result from stationary and area sources during operation under the proposed project may be subject to SCAQMD rules and regulations. The 2012 AQMP demonstrated attainment of the federal 24-hour PM2.5 standard by 2014 in the SCAB through adoption of all feasible measures, and accommodates planned growth in the SCAB. Based on general plans for cities and counties in the SCAB, including the City of Anaheim, demographic growth forecasts for various socioeconomic categories (e.g., population, housing, employment by industry)— developed by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG) for its 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy—were used in the 2012 AQMP. The 2012 AQMP reduction and control measures to mitigate emissions were based on existing and projected land use and development. Projects are considered consistent with, and would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of, the AQMP if the growth in socioeconomic factors is consistent with the underlying regional plans used to develop the AQMP. The City’s General Plan land use designation for the proposed project is Mixed-Use and Open Space-Parks (City of Anaheim 2015). In 2004, the City created a mixed-use overlay zone in the Platinum Triangle, where the project site is located. The mixed-used overlay zone allows the area to be developed with residential and commercial uses. Consistent with its land use designation and zoning, the proposed project would provide a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; and a 1.11-acre public park. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 63 May 2016 The proposed project would not conflict with SCAG’s growth projections anticipated in the 2012 AQMP because the project satisfies the primary purpose of the mixed-use overlay zone and would not introduce a land use or zoning conflict. Because the proposed project’s underlying land use designation and zoning would remain the same, vehicle trip generation and planned development for the project site has already been considered in SCAG’s growth projections. Notably, the proposed project would also support future growth of a more urban environment with high-density compact development that promotes pedestrian connectivity and the use of public transit. Therefore, impacts associated with the potential to conflict with or obstruct implementation of the AQMP would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to violate air quality standards and contribute to an existing or projected air quality violation. Specifically, the SEIR found that both construction and operational activities would generate substantially more short- term and long-term air pollutants, respectively, compared to the adopted PTMLUP, and would continue to exceed SCAQMD’s regional significance thresholds. Even with incorporation of Mitigation Measures 2-1 through 2-6 from the SEIR, impacts were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. An area is designated as in attainment when it is in compliance with the NAAQS and/or the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS). These standards are set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and CARB, respectively, for the maximum level of a given air pollutant that can exist in the outdoor air without unacceptable effects on human health or the public welfare. The criteria pollutants of primary concern that are considered in this air quality assessment are O3, nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), sulfur dioxide, particulate matter with a diameter less than or equal to 10 microns (PM10), and PM2.5. Although there are no ambient standards for volatile organic compounds (VOCs) or oxides of nitrogen (NOx), they are important as precursors to O3. The entire SCAB is designated as a nonattainment area for both federal and state O3 standards (CARB 2014a; Environmental Protection Agency 2015). The Environmental Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 64 May 2016 Protection Agency has classified the SCAB as an “extreme” nonattainment area for O3, and has mandated that it achieve attainment no later than June 15, 2024. The SCAB is designated as an attainment area for state and federal CO standards, and as an attainment area under the state and federal standards for NO2. The entire SCAB is in attainment with both federal and state sulfur dioxide standards. The SCAB is designated as a nonattainment area for the state PM10 standards, and state and federal PM2.5 standards; however, it is designated as an attainment area for federal PM10 standards. Short-Term Construction Emissions Construction of the proposed project would result in a temporary addition of pollutants to the local airshed caused by soil disturbance, fugitive dust emissions, and combustion pollutants from on-site construction equipment and from off-site trucks hauling construction materials. Construction emissions can vary substantially from day to day, depending on the level of activity; the specific type of operation; and, for dust, the prevailing weather conditions. Construction of the proposed project would generate air pollutant emissions from activities such as entrained dust, off-road equipment, vehicle emissions, and architectural coatings. Entrained dust results from the exposure of earth surfaces to wind from the direct disturbance and movement of soil, resulting in PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. Fugitive dust (PM10 and PM2.5) emissions would primarily result from grading and site preparation activities. The proposed project would be required to comply with Mitigation Measure 2- 2 from SEIR No. 339 to control dust emissions generated during asphalt and building foundation demolition, site preparation (clearing and grubbing) and grading activities, and building construction. Internal combustion engines used by construction equipment and haul trucks, vendor trucks, and worker vehicles would result in emissions of VOCs, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The application of architectural coatings, such as exterior application/interior paint and other finishes, would also produce VOC emissions. Construction emissions were calculated for the estimated worst-case day over the construction period. Default values provided by CalEEMod were used where detailed project information was not available. It is anticipated that construction of the project would involve overlapping construction phases that would commence in December 2016 and end by September 2020. For purposes of estimating project emissions, and based on information provided by the project applicant, it is assumed that construction activity would occur continuously. The analysis contained herein is based on the following assumptions (duration of phases is approximate): Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 65 May 2016 Buildings 1 and 2  Demolition (asphalt and building foundations) – 4 weeks (December 2016)  Site preparation (clearing and grubbing) – 2 weeks (December 2016 – January 2017)  Grading – 6 weeks (January 2017 – February 2017)  Trenching (utilities) – 13 weeks (February 2017 – May 2017)  Building construction – 86 weeks (March 2017 – November 2018)  Paving – 6 weeks (November 2018 – December 2018)  Architectural coating – 6 weeks (December 2018 – February 2019) Building 3  Building construction – 126 weeks (February 2018 – July 2020)  Architectural coating – 9 weeks (July 2020 – September 2020) The construction equipment mix and estimated hours of equipment operation per day used for the air pollutant emissions modeling of the proposed project are shown in Table 3.3-1, Construction Scenario Assumptions. For this analysis, it was assumed that heavy construction equipment would be used 5 days a week (22 days per month) during project construction. Table 3.3-1 also presents estimated workers anticipated for each construction sequence, based on CalEEMod default values. To estimate motor vehicle emissions generated by worker vehicles (i.e., light duty trucks and automobiles), it was assumed that each worker would generate two one-way trips. In addition to construction equipment operation and worker trips, emissions from hauling (i.e., dump trucks) and vendor trucks (i.e., delivery trucks) were estimated using CalEEMod default values. Haul trucks hauling waste off-site were conservatively assumed to travel 20 miles one way to the closest landfill. Haul truck trips were assumed to be required during the demolition and grading phases. Vendor trucks transporting concrete, steel, and other building materials were assumed for the building construction phases. Detailed construction assumptions, including estimated daily worker and vendor trips and total estimated haul truck trips, are provided in Appendix B. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 66 May 2016 Table 3.3-1 Construction Scenario Assumptions Construction Phase Average Daily Worker Trips Average Daily Vendor Truck Trips Total Haul Truck Trips Equipment Quantity Usage Hours Demolition 16 0 840 Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8 Excavators 2 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 Water Truck 1 8 Site Preparation 14 0 0 Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Water Truck 1 8 Grading 24 0 3,200 Excavators 2 8 Graders 1 8 Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8 Scrapers 2 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Water Truck 1 8 Trenching 14 0 0 Excavators 2 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8 Water Truck 1 8 Building Construction (Buildings 1 and 2) 200 208 0 Cranes 1 7 Forklifts 3 8 Generator Sets 1 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 Welders 2 8 Air Compressors 3 8 Building Construction (Building 3) 200 84 0 Forklifts 3 8 Generator Sets 1 8 Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7 Welders 1 8 Air Compressors 3 8 Paving 16 0 0 Pavers 2 8 Paving Equipment 2 8 Rollers 2 8 Architectural Coating (Buildings 1 and 2) 100 0 0 Air Compressors 1 6 Architectural Coating (Building 3) 100 0 0 Air Compressors 1 6 Notes: See Appendix B for further details. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 67 May 2016 Table 3.3-2, Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions, presents the estimated maximum daily emissions generated during construction of the proposed project. Additionally, Mitigation Measures 2-1 through 2-3 from SEIR No. 339, which would reduce localized concentration of air pollutants during construction of the proposed project, were incorporated for this analysis. As described previously, Buildings 1 and 2 would be constructed from 2016 to 2019; Building 3 would be constructed from 2018 to 2020. Accordingly, project-generated emissions in 2018 and 2019 reflect concurrent construction of Buildings 1, 2, and 3. The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results generated by CalEEMod for each year construction activities would occur. Further details regarding emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B. Table 3.3-2 Estimated Maximum Daily Construction Emissions Year VOC (lbs/day) NOx (lbs/day) CO (lbs/day) SOx (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) 2016 2.02 34.54 38.72 0.08 5.45 3.42 2017 5.11 64.02 81.54 0.16 7.34 3.92 2018 148.75 61.73 99.98 0.19 11.60 5.23 2019 148.59 25.44 45.60 0.10 7.60 3.00 2020 45.76 22.86 38.84 0.08 6.36 2.58 Maximum Daily 148.75 64.02 99.98 0.19 11.60 5.23 Pollutant Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? Yes No No No No No See Appendix B for detailed results. The values shown are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results from CalEEMod. VOC = volatile organic compound; NOx = oxides of nitrogen; CO = carbon monoxide; SOx = sulfur oxides; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter; lbs/day = pounds per day Maximum daily emissions of NOx would occur during the grading phase in 2017 as a result of off-road equipment operation and on-road hauling trucks. Fugitive dust during the site preparation phase in 2017 would generate the maximum daily PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. The application of architectural coatings for Buildings 1 and 2 in 2018 would produce the maximum daily VOC emissions. As shown in Table 3.3-2, daily construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds for NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5, but the significance threshold for VOC emissions would be exceeded during construction in 2018 and 2019. The project previously analyzed in SEIR No.339 was found to exceed the significance thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Therefore, short-term construction impacts associated Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 68 May 2016 with exceeding the significance thresholds for VOC would remain significant, although the level of impact for construction-generated emissions would not increase from the level identified both in SEIR No. 339 and in the statement of overriding considerations adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Long-Term Operational Impacts Following the completion of construction activities and once operational, the proposed project would generate VOC, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions from vehicular traffic, area sources (consumer products, architectural coatings, landscaping equipment), and energy sources (natural gas appliances, space and water heating). Vehicular Traffic The project would impact air quality through the vehicular traffic generated by the proposed project. According to the proposed project’s Traffic Impact Study (Appendix I), full build-out of the proposed project would result in 8,114 trips per day. The proposed project would primarily impact air quality through vehicular traffic generated by employees and customers of the retail and live/work land uses, and residents of the apartment land uses. Emissions factors representing the vehicle mix and emissions for 2021 (first full year of operation) were used to estimate emissions associated with full build-out of the proposed project. On-road vehicular emissions associated with the proposed project were modeled using trip-generation rates prepared for the project from the Traffic Impact Study (Appendix I). As presented in the Traffic Impact Study, trip rates were identified for the following land uses for typical weekday operational scenarios: apartments, specialty retail, and live/work. Live/work was calculated as specialty retail due to not having a specific land use category reference. Because the Traffic Impact Study did not include separate weekend trip rates, the weekday trip rates were assumed for the Saturday and Sunday trip rates in CalEEMod. Energy In addition to estimating mobile-source emissions, CalEEMod was also used to estimate emissions from the proposed project’s energy use (natural gas combustion). The default energy input ratios for Title 24 and non-Title 24 natural gas consumption as provided in CalEEMod were applied to the proposed project’s energy estimates (State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings, Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations). Refer to Appendix B for additional information. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 69 May 2016 Area Sources CalEEMod was also used to estimate emissions from the proposed project’s area sources, which include landscaping maintenance equipment, consumer products, hearths, and architectural coatings for building maintenance. Refer to Appendix B for additional information. Table 3.3-3, Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Emissions, presents the maximum daily emissions associated with operation of the proposed project. The values shown for motor vehicles, energy, and area sources are the maximum summer or winter daily emissions results from CalEEMod. Complete details of the emissions calculations are provided in Appendix B. Table 3.3-3 Estimated Maximum Daily Operational Emissions Emissions Source VOC (lbs/day) NOx (lbs/day) CO (lbs/day) SOx (lbs/day) PM10 (lbs/day) PM2.5 (lbs/day) Area 47.39 1.03 89.51 >0.01 1.76 1.75 Energy 0.22 1.88 0.81 0.01 0.16 0.16 Mobile 19.14 32.33 165.82 0.50 37.49 10.35 Total 66.75 35.24 256.14 0.51 39.41 12.26 Emission Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Threshold Exceeded? Yes No No No No No See Appendix B for detailed results. Emissions represent maximum of summer and winter. “Summer” emissions are representative of the conditions that may occur during the ozone season (May 1 through October 31), and “winter” emissions are representative of the conditions that may occur during the balance of the year (November 1 through April 30). See Table 3.3-2 for acronym definitions. As shown in Table 3.3-3, daily operational emissions at build-out of the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds for NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, or PM2.5, but the project would exceed the significance threshold for VOC emissions. The project previously analyzed in SEIR No.339 was found to exceed the significance thresholds for VOC, NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. Therefore, long-term operational impacts associated with exceeding the significance thresholds for VOC would remain significant, although the level of impact for emissions generated from operation of the project would not increase from the level identified both in SEIR No. 339 and in the statement of overriding considerations adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 70 May 2016 c) Would the project result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is in nonattainment under an applicable federal or state ambient air quality standard. In particular, the SEIR found that both construction and operational activities would generate substantially more short-term and long-term air pollutants, respectively, compared to the adopted PTMLUP, and would continue to exceed SCAQMD’s regional significance thresholds. Even with incorporation of Mitigation Measures 2-1 through 2-6 from the SEIR, impacts were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Air pollution, by nature, is largely a cumulative impact. The nonattainment status of regional pollutants is a result of past and present development, and the SCAQMD develops and implements plans for future attainment of ambient air quality standards. In considering cumulative impacts from the proposed project, the assessment must specifically evaluate a project’s contribution to the cumulative increase in pollutants for which the SCAB is designated as nonattainment for the NAAQS or CAAQS. A project would be considered to have a significant cumulative impact if the project’s contribution accounts for a significant proportion of the cumulative total emissions (i.e., it represents a “cumulatively considerable contribution” to the cumulative air quality impact). Based on the cumulative nature of air pollution and the various mechanisms in place to reduce cumulative air pollutant emissions, project-level thresholds of significance for criteria pollutants, as analyzed in Section 3.3(b), are relevant in the determination of whether the proposed project’s individual emissions would have a cumulatively significant impact on air quality. If a project’s emissions would exceed the SCAQMD’s project-level significance thresholds, it would be considered to have a cumulatively considerable contribution to nonattainment status in the SCAB. If a project does not exceed thresholds and is determined to have less-than-significant project- level impacts, it may still contribute to a significant cumulative impact on air quality; however, the project’s contribution would not be considered cumulatively considerable. In this context, the basis for analyzing the proposed project’s cumulatively considerable Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 71 May 2016 contribution is the project’s potential to exceed SCAQMD thresholds and its consistency with the most recent AQMP. The SCAB is a nonattainment area for O3, PM10, and PM2.5 under the NAAQS and/or CAAQS. The nonattainment status in the SCAB is the result of cumulative emissions from motor vehicles, off-road equipment, commercial and industrial facilities, and other emissions sources. Projects that emit these pollutants or their precursors (e.g., VOC and NOx for O3) potentially contribute to poor air quality. Implementation of the proposed project would generate emissions of VOCs, NOx, CO, SOx, PM10, and PM2.5 associated with construction and operational (i.e., increased vehicle traffic to and from the site, energy use, and area source emissions) activities. As presented in Tables 3.3-2 and 3.3-3, construction emissions from the proposed project and the combined operational emissions at build-out of the project would exceed the SCAQMD’s significance threshold for VOC emissions. However, as discussed in Section 3.3(a), the proposed project would not conflict with the SCAQMD’s 2012 AQMP, which addresses cumulative emissions in the SCAB. The proposed project was determined to be consistent with the growth assumed by the SCAQMD’s 2012 AQMP since the project’s intended actions are consistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan and would not conflict with the General Plan’s land use designation for the project site. Because project- generated construction and operational VOC emissions would exceed the SCAQMD’s significance thresholds, the project would result in an increase in emissions of nonattainment pollutants or their precursors (e.g., VOC and NOx for O3). Therefore, the proposed project’s VOC emissions would exceed regional thresholds, and thus, would contribute to a cumulative impact in SCAB. However, the level of impact for both construction-generated emissions and emissions generated from operation of the project would not increase from the level identified both in SEIR No. 339 and in the statement of overriding considerations adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. d) Would the project expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Specifically, the SEIR found that (1) construction activities would potentially expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5, and that (2) sensitive land uses within 500 feet of SR-57 and I-5, or within the recommended buffer distances to facilities emitting toxic air contaminants, may be exposed to substantial pollutant concentrations. Even with incorporation of Mitigation Measures 2-1 through 2-4 and Mitigation Measures 2-7 through 2-9 from the SEIR, impacts Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 72 May 2016 were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Short-Term Construction Impacts The SCAQMD recommends evaluation of localized NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions and associated construction-related impacts to sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of a project site. Such an evaluation is referred to as a localized significance threshold (LST) analysis. Sensitive receptors include residential land uses, schools, open space and parks, recreational facilities, hospitals, resident care facilities, daycare facilities, and other facilities that may house individuals with health conditions that would be affected by poor air quality. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors to project construction activities during all phases of the project would be multi-family residences located immediately south (approximately 60 feet) of the bounds of the proposed project’s construction area. For project sites that are less than 5 acres, the SCAQMD Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (SCAQMD 2009) includes lookup tables that can be used to determine the maximum allowable daily emissions that would satisfy the localized significance criteria (i.e., emissions would not cause an exceedance of the applicable concentration limits for NO2, CO, PM10, or PM2.5). The allowable emissions rates depend on the following parameters: source/receptor area within which the project is located, the size of the project site, and the distance between the project site and the nearest sensitive receptor. The project site is located in Source–Receptor Area 17 (Central Orange County). Although the project site is larger than 5 acres (at 17.57 acres), the SCAQMD provides guidance for applying CalEEMod to the LSTs (SCAQMD 2015) for sites larger than 5 acres but involve construction activities that would result in a daily disturbance equal to or less than 5 acres of disturbance per day. Construction activities associated with the project would result in temporary sources of on-site fugitive dust and construction equipment emissions. Off-site emissions from vendor trucks, haul trucks, and worker vehicle trips are not included in the LST analysis. The greatest on-site emissions of NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 generated during construction of the proposed project would occur during the grading phase. During the 6- week grading period, it was assumed that two excavators, one grader, one rubber-tired dozer, two scrapers, and two tractors/loaders/backhoes would be used per 8-hour day Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 73 May 2016 based on default information generated by CalEEMod. Since operation of grading equipment resulted in the maximum daily on-site emissions of LST pollutants, project- generated on-site construction emissions during site preparation were compared to the LST thresholds to determine the project’s potential to impact sensitive receptors in the immediate vicinity of the project site. CalEEMod default values assume that, during an 8- hour day, graders and rubber-tired dozers can disturb a maximum of 0.5 acre, and scrapers can disturb a maximum of one acre. Although CalEEMod does not provide default grading values for tractors/loaders/backhoes, it was assumed that each tractor/ loader/backhoe can disturb a maximum of 0.5 acre per 8-hour day (consistent with the CalEEMod grading assumption for crawler tractors, graders, and rubber-tired dozers). This results in 4 acres disturbed per day ((0.5 acre × 1) + (0.5 acre × 1) + (0.5 acre × 2) + (1 acre × 2) = 4 acres). Because the SCAQMD does not provide lookup tables for 4 acres, the LST values for 3 and 5 acres within Source–Receptor Area 17 with a receptor distance of 25 meters (82 feet) (the shortest distance provided by the SCAQMD) were interpolated to generate LSTs for 4 acres. See Appendix B for details. The maximum daily on-site construction emissions generated by the proposed project, which are rounded to the nearest whole number, are presented in Table 3.3-4, Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis for Project Construction, and compared to the SCAQMD localized significance criteria for Source–Receptor Area 17 to determine if project-generated on-site construction emissions would result in potential LST impacts. Table 3.3-4 Localized Significance Thresholds Analysis for Project Construction Pollutant On-Site Project Construction Emissions (pounds per day) LST Criteria (pounds per day) Exceeds LST? NO2 32 160 No CO 37 1,074 No PM10 5 11 No PM2.5 3 6 No Source: SCAQMD 2009 See Appendix B for detailed results. LST = localized significance threshold; NO2 = nitrogen dioxide; CO = carbon monoxide; PM10 = coarse particulate matter; PM2.5 = fine particulate matter To determine the LST criteria for the project, the LSTs for a 2- and 5-acre site with a receptor distances within 82 feet (25 meters) were interpolated to generate LSTs for a 4-acre site with sensitive receptors located within 82 feet (25 meters) of construction activity. As shown in Table 3.3-4, construction activities associated with the proposed project would not generate emissions in excess of site-specific LSTs. Therefore, short-term construction impacts associated with exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 74 May 2016 concentrations would be less than significant, and level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Long-Term Operational Impacts Operation of the proposed project would not result in direct emissions (e.g., those from a point source such as boilers or engines). In addition, operation of the proposed project would not result in a substantial increase in diesel vehicles (e.g., delivery trucks) over existing baseline conditions. Thus, operation of the propose project would not result in exposure to sensitive receptors in the vicinity of the project site. In 2005, CARB developed the Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective (CARB handbook), which was intended to serve as a general reference guide for evaluating and reducing air pollution impacts associated with new land use development projects. The CARB handbook addresses the importance of considering health risk issues when siting sensitive land uses (e.g., new residences, schools, day care centers, playgrounds, and medical facilities) in the vicinity of intensive air emission sources, and recommended against siting sensitive land uses within 500 feet of a freeway or high-traffic roads (CARB 2005). The proposed project, including the project’s sensitive receptor land uses, would not be located within 500 feet from I-5 or SR-57. As such, the proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to toxic air contaminants generated by an off-site source (e.g., vehicle-generated diesel particulate matter emissions). Therefore, long-term operational impacts associated with exposing sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations would be less than significant, and level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. e) Would the project create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with objectionable odors to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measure 2-10. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Odors would be generated from vehicle and/or equipment exhaust emissions during construction of the proposed project. Odors produced during construction would be attributable to concentrations of unburned hydrocarbons from tailpipes of Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 75 May 2016 construction equipment and from architectural coatings. Such odors would disperse rapidly from the project site and generally occur at magnitudes that would not affect substantial numbers of people. Additionally, the proposed project does not include land uses typically associated with odor complaints. The SCAQMD identifies several land use types that are known to cause odors, including agriculture, wastewater treatment plants, rail yards, and dairies. The proposed project does not include industrial land uses that would generate odors. Typical odors generated from operation of the proposed project would include vehicle exhaust generated by residents, customers or employees traveling to and from the retail and live/work component, and through the periodic use of landscaping or maintenance equipment; however, these odors are not considered objectionable odors that would affect a substantial number of people. Therefore, impacts associated with creation of objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people would be less than significant, and level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.3.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measures related to air quality, which are applicable to the proposed project: MM 2‐1 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to reduce construction-related emissions; however, the resultant value is expected to remain significant. a. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations to reduce operational emissions. b. The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, off-road construction equipment with higher air pollutant emissions standards for equipment greater than 50 horsepower, based on manufacturer’s availability. c. The contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary diesel-power generators, where feasible. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 76 May 2016 MM 2-2 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall implement the following measures in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. To assure compliance, the City shall verify compliance that these measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections. The measures to be implemented are listed below: a. During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering as quickly as possible to achieve a minimum control efficiency for PM10 of 5 percent. b. During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall apply chemical soil stabilizers to on-site haul roads to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared to travel on unpaved, untreated roads. c. The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. d. The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. e. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall sweep streets with Rule 1186-compliant PM10-efficient vacuum units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. f. During active demolition and debris removal and grading, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall suspend demolition and grading operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to achieve an emissions control efficiency for PM10 under worst-case wind conditions of 98 percent. g. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-inch freeboard ratio on haul trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials and tarp materials with a fabric cover or other suitable means to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 77 May 2016 h. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of every three hours on the construction site to achieve an emissions reduction control efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent. i. During active demolition and debris removal, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall apply water to disturbed soils at the end of each day to achieve an emission control efficiency for PM10 of 10 percent. j. During scraper unloading and loading, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall ensure that actively disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil moisture content of 12 percent by use of a moveable sprinkler system or water truck to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 69 percent. k. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles per hour to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 57 percent. MM 2-3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials. These plans shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project site. MM 2-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that high-solids or water-based low emissions paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. Additionally, the property Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 78 May 2016 owner/developer’s shall specify the use of high-volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand application. Air-atomized spray techniques shall not be permitted. Plans shall also show that property owner/developers shall construct/build with materials that do not require painting, or use prepainted construction materials, to the extent feasible. MM 2-5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational CO [carbon monoxide], NOx [oxides of nitrogen], ROG [reactive organic gas], and PM10 [particulate matter] emissions:  Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 2010 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall be implemented as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.  The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site frontage routes as needed. MM 2-6 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property owner/architect shall submit energy calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Department that shows each new structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall show the following: a. Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building materials and suppliers can be found at the following website: http://energy.lbl.gov/coolroof/ or other similar websites. b. Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways not within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool pavement materials are available at: Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 79 May 2016 http://www.epa.gov/heat-islands/using-cool-pavements-reduce-heat- islands or other similar websites. c. Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances (e.g., EnergyStar® appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or double-paned windows. d. Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing over 50,000 square-feet. e. Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the building structure to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and office buildings. MM 2-8 Based on the recommended buffer distances of the California Air Resources Board, applicants for new developments in the Platinum Triangle shall place residential structures and active outdoor recreational areas outside of the recommended buffer distances to the following stationary air pollutant sources:  1,000 feet from the truck bays with an existing distribution center that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units, or where transport refrigeration unit operations exceed 300 hours per week.  1,000 feet from an existing chrome plating facility.  300 feet from a dry-cleaning facility using perchloroethylene using one machine and 500 feet from dry-cleaning facility using perchloroethylene using two machines.  50 feet from gas pumps within a gas-dispensing facility and 300 feet from gas pumps within a gasoline-dispensing facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater. 3.4 Biological Resources The following analysis is based, in part, on a biological resources assessment conducted by Dudek in February 2016. The assessment included a review of available relevant literature and data on special-status habitats and species distribution to determine those resources that have the potential for occurrence within approximately 100 feet of the project site (i.e., the study area). Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 80 May 2016 All appropriate and available biological documentation, surveys, published research, and maps were compiled, reviewed, and analyzed. The most recent versions of the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW) California Natural Diversity Database (CDFW 2016), U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s (USFWS) Environmental Conservation Online System (USFWS 2016a), and the California Native Plant Society’s Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (CNPS 2016) were reviewed to identify sensitive biological resources present or potentially present for the U.S. Geological Survey 7.5-minute quadrangle on which the project site is located (i.e., Anaheim) and the eight surrounding quadrangles (i.e., Whittier, La Habra, Yorba Linda, Los Alamitos, Orange, Seal Beach, Newport Beach, and Tustin). These databases provided information regarding special-status plants, wildlife, and habitats recorded for the project site and vicinity. Dudek also reviewed soil survey maps (Wachtell 1978), U.S. Geological Survey National Hydrography Dataset of aquatic resources, USFWS National Wetlands Inventory maps (USFWS 2016b), and other in-house documentation, GIS layers, and sources for locations of special-status species and water resources. Following the literature review, Dudek Senior Biologist Ryan Henry conducted a general survey of the study area on February 26, 2016, to identify existing biological resources and confirm potential biological constraints. During the field survey, land covers and vegetation communities were identified, and a general inventory of plant and wildlife species detected by sight, calls, tracks, scat, or other sign was compiled, as well as a determination of potential special-status species that could occur within the study area. Results from the general biological survey identified the following non-native land covers: developed (paved surfaces), disturbed (graded areas), ornamental (planted trees along the perimeter of the study area along Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard), and ruderal grassland (actively disturbed and maintained areas). Vegetation was limited to ornamental plantings and ruderal forb species that included soft brome (Bromus hordeaceus), lambsquarters (Chenopodium album), carrot wood (Cupaniopsis anacardioides), longbeak stork’s bill (Erodium botrys), common barley (Hordeum vulgare), miniature lupine (Lupinus bicolor), cheeseweed mallow (Malva parviflora), alkali mallow (Malvella leprosa), paperbark (Melaleuca quinquenervia), yellow sweetclover (Melilotus albus), fern pine (Podocarpus gracilior), Callery pear (Pyrus calleryana), prickly Russian thistle (Salsola tragus), and London rocket (Sisymbrium irio). The following wildlife species were detected on or adjacent to the study area: Anna’s hummingbird (Calypte anna), house finch (Carpodacus mexicanus), American crow (Corvus brachyrhynchos), black phoebe (Sayornis nigricans), lesser goldfinch (Spinus psaltria), western meadowlark (Sturnella neglecta), and mourning dove (Zenaida macroura). No active bird nesting was observed during the site visit, but the various trees and shrubs in the study area could support nesting birds. Evidence of one mammal, domestic dog (Canis lupus familiaris), was Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 81 May 2016 detected on the project site. No amphibian, reptile, invertebrate, or fish species were observed within the study area. Plant and wildlife species detected within the study area are included in Appendix C of this document. a) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with candidate, sensitive, or special-status species would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project site is predominantly disturbed and located within a highly urbanized area of the City. As a result, the potential for special-status plant and wildlife species is limited. Plant Species Special-status plants include those listed, or candidates for listing, as threatened or endangered by USFWS or CDFW, and species identified as rare by the California Native Plant Society (particularly California Rare Plant Rank [CRPR] 1A – Presumed extinct in California; CRPR 1B – Rare, threatened, or endangered throughout its range; and CRPR 2 – Rare or endangered in California, more common elsewhere). A total of 46 special-status plant species were reported in the California Natural Diversity Database, USFWS database, and California Native Plant Society database as occurring in the project region (Appendix C). None of the plant occurrences are located within the study area. Additionally, based on these species’ ranges and the developed land cover that characterizes the project site, there is no potential for special-status plants to occur. Further, no USFWS-designated critical habitat for listed plant species occurs within the study area. No special-status plant species were observed within the study area during the site visit. Therefore, no direct or indirect impacts to special-status plant species would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 82 May 2016 Wildlife Species Special-status wildlife include those listed, or candidates for listing, as threatened or endangered by USFWS or CDFW, and designated as a Species of Special Concern by CDFW. A total of 56 special-status wildlife species were reported in the California Natural Diversity Database and USFWS database as occurring in the project region (Appendix C). None of the wildlife occurrences are located within the study area. Additionally, based on the species’ ranges and the non-natural land covers and urban pressures present on the project site, there is little to no potential for special-status wildlife to occur. Further, no USFWS-designated critical habitat for listed wildlife species occurs within the study area. No special-status wildlife species were observed within the study area during the site visit. Nonetheless, ornamental landscape trees are located along the perimeter of the project site, and a few are scattered throughout the site. Despite the disturbed nature of the project site, these trees could potentially provide nesting opportunities for bird and raptor species protected under the California Fish and Game Code and the MBTA. Any disturbance to the existing landscape trees within the study area would need to occur outside of the nesting season to comply with the California Fish and Game Code and MBTA. The nesting season generally occurs from February through August. Consistent with the regulatory requirements of the California Fish and Game Code and MBTA, if tree trimming or removal are deemed necessary during the nesting season, then all suitable nesting habitat should be thoroughly surveyed for the presence of nesting birds prior to project-related vegetation clearing. Typically, if an active nest is detected, an appropriate avoidance buffer around the nest, as determined by a qualified biologist, should be flagged and avoided until the nesting cycle is complete. No special-status wildlife species were observed within the study area during the site visit. Therefore, with compliance with federal and state regulatory requirements, no direct or indirect impacts to special-status wildlife species would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities would occur. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 83 May 2016 Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. No riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by CDFW or USFWS, were identified on the project site during the site visit. Therefore, no impacts to riparian habitat or other sensitive natural communities would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with federally protect wetlands would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Based on the site visit, the project site does not contain any federal jurisdictional wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Further, the project site does not support any aquatic resources regulated by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Regional Water Quality Control Board, or CDFW as jurisdictional “waters of the U.S.” or “waters of the state.” Therefore, no impacts associated with federally protected wetlands would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. d) Would the project interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found no impacts associated with migratory wildlife corridors and native wildlife nursery sites would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Several local and regional roadways traverse the broader study area, including Gene Autry Way, State College Boulevard, Gateway Center, I-5, and SR-57. These roadways, Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 84 May 2016 along with the extensive amount of existing development that surrounds the project site, creates a highly fragmented, noncontiguous landscape that is not conducive to substantial wildlife movement. Additionally, the project site itself is predominantly disturbed and does not provide suitable native wildlife nursery habitat. Therefore, no impacts associated with wildlife movement corridors or nursery sites would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in SEIR No. 339. e) Would the project conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Implementation of the proposed project would likely require removal of the ornamental trees located on the project site. Additionally, depending on final designs, some trees located in the adjacent public rights-of-way may also require removal or maintenance (e.g., trimming, pruning). If City-owned trees or shrubs that occur within City rights-of- way need to be trimmed or removed, then the project applicant would be required to comply with all applicable provisions of the City’s tree protection ordinances (Anaheim Municipal Code, Sections 11.12.010 through 11.12.040, and Sections 13.12.010 through 13.12.090), which regulates planting, maintaining, protecting, and removing City-owned trees and shrubs in City rights-of-way. Therefore, with compliance with local regulatory requirements, no impacts associated with local policies or ordinances would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in SEIR No. 339. f) Would the project conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Community Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project site is not located within a designated Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Communities Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or state habitat Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 85 May 2016 conservation plan area. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with local, regional, or state resource preservation and/or conservation policies. Therefore, no impacts associated with conservation plan provisions or polices would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.4.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to biological resources. 3.5 Cultural Resources The following analysis is based, in part, on the March 2016 Cultural Resources Memorandum prepared by Dudek and included as Appendix D of this document. a) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with historical resources would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. In relation to the CEQA Guidelines, a site or structure may be considered a historical resource if it is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California Public Resources Code Section 5020.1(j), or if it meets the criteria for listing in either the National Register of Historic Places or the California Register of Historical Resources (14 Code of Federal Regulations Section 4850). CEQA allows local historic resource guidelines to serve as the California Register of Historical Resources criteria if enacted by local legislation to act as the equivalent of the state criteria. Typically, researchers in California use a 50-year age threshold following State Historic Preservation Office recommendations. If the potentially historical resource has integrity and any one of the criteria noted below is met, the resource would be considered significant, and a direct impact to the resource would be considered a significant impact on the environment: 1. Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California’s history and cultural heritage; 2. Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past; Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 86 May 2016 3. Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represent the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values; and/or 4. Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. The project site was historically used for agricultural purposes from circa 1930s until the mid-1970s, following which the site was developed with nine commercial/industrial buildings. However, in the mid-2000s, eight of the nine on-site buildings were demolished, with the ninth building demolished in 2013. The project site has been completely vacant since 2013. Based on the lack of buildings, structures, foundations, and other remnants of note on the project site, no physical improvements are found on site that meet any of the significance criteria listed above; as such, development of the project site would not result in any direct or indirect impacts to historical resources. Therefore, no impacts associated with historical resources would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with archaeological resources would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The review of records search data and the reconnaissance-level pedestrian survey did not identify any cultural resources on the project site (Appendix D). Additionally, no pre- historic or historic archaeological resources were identified within the 0.5-mile search radius around the project site. Although four resources were identified within the 0.5-mile search radius but outside the project site, each consisted of historic-age built-environment resources and not archeological resources. The project site was primarily used as agricultural land until the late 20th century. Historic topographic maps and aerial photographs do not indicate the presence of any buildings, structures, or features on the property before then. Additionally, the project site was depicted as flat open field. There are no discernable topographic features on the project site that indicate a possible water source, bedrock outcrop, or any other natural Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 87 May 2016 element suggestive of possible pre-historic land use. The project site was completely developed by 1980, with commercial/industrial buildings encompassing the site. The project site has stood vacant since the demolition of the buildings following approval of the previous project in 2007. Demolition of these buildings was completed in 2013. Although the buildings no longer exist, much of the surface and underground infrastructure still remains. Based on the records search results, negative survey, and highly disturbed condition of the project site, the site has a low potential for the inadvertent discovery of cultural resources during construction. Thus, no additional management recommendations have been identified other than standard protection measures for unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources and human remains during construction activities. Nonetheless, consistent with existing regulatory requirements outlined in 14 California Code of Regulations 15064.5(f) and Public Resources Code Section 20182, in the event that archaeological resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find would immediately stop until a qualified archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether or not additional study is warranted. Depending on the significance of the find under CEQA, the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work, such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery, may be warranted. Therefore, based on both the low potential for the inadvertent discovery of cultural resources during construction and compliance with state regulatory requirements, no impacts associated with archeological resources would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource on site or unique geologic feature? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found no impacts associated with paleontological resources or unique geologic features would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 88 May 2016 No paleontological resources were identified within the project site as a result of the institutional records search or desktop geological review. Furthermore, the project site is located within an area that has been previously developed and is likely underlain by fill materials. As such, the project site is not anticipated to be underlain by unique geologic features. No vertebrate fossil localities are recorded within the boundaries of the project site, although there are localities nearby from the same sedimentary units that occur as subsurface deposits in the broader project area. Surficial sediments at the project site and in the surrounding area consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of the general floodplain of the Santa Ana River that flows just east of the project area. These younger Quaternary deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, although a vertebrate fossil locality north of the project site located along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. The closest vertebrate fossil locality to the project site in older Quaternary sediments is situated along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street, east of the Santa Ana River, which produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8 to 10 feet below the surface. These localities are found approximately 2.75 miles and 2.9 miles, respectively, from the project site. Grading or very shallow excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger Quaternary alluvial sediments in the project site are unlikely to uncover significant fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations at the proposed project site area that extend down into older deposits, however, may encounter vertebrate fossils. A review of the preliminary grading plans for the proposed project show that although considerable quantities of earthmoving would occur on site to prepare the project site for construction of the buildings and associated improvements, substantial amounts of excavation activities would not be required at depths where vertebrate fossils can potentially occur (approximately 8 feet below grade or deeper). Based on this consideration, as well as the fact that the project site has been previously developed and no significant paleontological find has occurred in the immediate project area, the potential for the proposed project to adversely affect any paleontological resources of significance is deemed low. Therefore, no impacts associated with paleontological resources would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 89 May 2016 d) Would the project disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with human remains would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. No formal cemeteries are located on or adjacent to the project site, and no burial grounds or other informal places of rest have been previously recorded in the project area. Thus, implementation of the proposed project is not anticipated to impact human remains. However, as with any earth-moving activities, there is always a potential, albeit remote, that human remains may be encountered. As such, in accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the County Coroner would immediately be notified of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains would occur until the County Coroner has determined, within two working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, he or she would notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descendent from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendent would complete his/her inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. Therefore, with compliance with state regulatory requirements, no impacts associated with human remains would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.5.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to cultural resources. 3.6 Geology and Soils The following analysis is based, in part, on the January 2016 Geotechnical Exploration Report prepared by Leighton and Associates and included as Appendix E of this document. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 90 May 2016 a) Would the project expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with earthquake fault rupture would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project site is not underlain by any known active faults, as delineated on the most recent Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map. According to the Geotechnical Exploration Report (Appendix E), no known or potentially active faults traverse the project site, and the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The locations of the closest active faults to the project site were generated using the U.S. Geological Survey website. The closest active fault to the project site is the Puente Hills Blind Thrust fault, which is located approximately 5.3 miles from the site. Other major active faults near the project site include the San Joaquin Hills Blind Thrust, Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone, and Elsinore Fault Zone, which are located approximately 7.3, 9.1, and 10.3 miles from the site, respectively (USGS 2008). Considering the locations of these faults relative to the project site, the potential for surface fault rupture occurrence at the site is considered low. Therefore, no impacts associated with earthquake fault rupture would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with strong seismic ground shaking to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project site may be exposed to impacts from earthquakes, including strong seismic ground shaking. According to the Geotechnical Exploration Report (Appendix E), over Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 91 May 2016 the life of the proposed project, the project site can expect to experience moderate to strong ground shaking resulted from the earthquake faults in the project region. In accordance with Chapter 15.03, Building Standards Codes and Administrative Provisions Pertaining to Building and Construction, of the City’s Municipal Code, the proposed project would be designed and constructed with all applicable design and seismic load standards set forth in the incumbent version of the CBC. These design considerations were established to help ensure structural integrity during an earthquake. All facets of design and construction would meet the standards established during final engineering and would adhere to the recommendations outlined in the site-specific Geotechnical Exploration Report (Appendix E). Therefore, impacts associated with strong seismic ground shaking would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project area may be exposed to impacts from earthquakes, including liquefaction. According to the Geotechnical Exploration Report (Appendix E), the project site is not located in an area prone to liquefaction as shown on the State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle (Appendix E). Typically, the phenomena of liquefaction is associated with areas underlain by shallow groundwater. Groundwater was not encountered during exploratory soil boring to a depth of 71.5 feet (Appendix E). Thus, based on these considerations, the potential for liquefaction occurring at the site is considered low. Therefore, impacts associated with seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction, would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. iv) Landslides? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with landslides would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 92 May 2016 The project area is already developed and does not contain any major hillsides or slopes in the immediate project area. As such, no impacts from landslides are anticipated. Additionally, according to the Geotechnical Exploration Report (Appendix E), the project site is not located in an area susceptible to seismically induced landslide on the Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle. Therefore, no impacts associated with landslides would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that impacts associated with soil erosion or topsoil loss would be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As discussed in SEIR No. 339, soils in the project area are considered to have a slight erosion potential. Development would be subject to local and state codes and requirements for erosion control and grading. Since construction activities would disturb one or more acres, the proposed project would be subject to the provisions of the NPDES General Construction Permit, consistent with SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 3-2 and state and local requirements. Construction activities subject to this permit include clearing, grading, and disturbances to the ground such as stockpiling and excavating. The General Construction Permit requires implementation of a SWPPP. Typically, a SWPPP contains a site map showing the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, stormwater collection and discharge points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways. The SWPPP must also include project construction features (i.e., BMPs) designed to prevent erosion and protect the quality of stormwater runoff. Sediment control BMPs may include stabilized construction entrances, straw wattles on embankments, and sediment filters on existing inlets. Additionally, the SWPPP must contain a visual monitoring program; a chemical monitoring program for “non-visible” pollutants, should any of the BMPs fail; and a sediment monitoring plan. Additionally, grading activities would be performed in conformance with the latest version (currently 2013) of the CBC (California Building Standards Commission 2013); Chapter 17.04, Grading, Excavations, Fills, Watercourses, of the Anaheim Municipal Code (City of Anaheim 2016); approved grading plans; and good engineering practices. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 93 May 2016 On-site and off-site stormwater drainage facilities and project site grading would be designed and constructed per the approved grading plans to prevent undue erosion and excessive deposits of mud, silt, and debris upon or within any public street, stormwater channel, storm drain, swale, or watercourse. Compliance with the requirements set forth in the NPDES General Construction Permit, including preparation of a SWPPP and incorporation of sediment control BMPs, and those provisions established by the Anaheim Municipal Code would reduce the potential for on-site and off-site erosion impacts. Therefore, impacts associated with erosion would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with unstable geologic units and soils to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As addressed in SEIR No. 339, the near-surface soils in the Platinum Triangle are generally medium-dense, fine, and fine-to-medium-dense sand with occasional traces of gravel and infrequent seams of silt. The expansion potential for these soils is considered low. As discussed in Sections 3.6(a)(iii) and 3.6(a)(iv), above, the proposed project would not be susceptible to substantial risks due to liquefaction or landslides. Additionally, there is no evidence of land subsidence (i.e., sinking due to lowering of the groundwater level) in the project area. As further detailed in Section 3.9(b), below, groundwater levels in the City are actively monitored and managed by the Orange County Water District to prevent overdraft of the Groundwater Basin. With the continued management of the Orange County Groundwater Basin, the potential for subsidence to affect the project site is low, and the proposed project would not be susceptible to increased risks due to subsidence. Further, subsurface activities and characteristics that are typically associated with collapse, including mining operations, karst topography, and natural caves, do not underlay the project site. As such, the proposed project would not be susceptible to significant risks due to collapse. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 94 May 2016 Therefore, impacts associated with unstable geologic units and soils would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. d) Would the project be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with expansive soils to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. According to the Geotechnical Exploration Report (Appendix E), the near-surface on-site soils exhibit very low expansion potential when subjected to increases in moisture. The potential for expansive soils to affect the project site is low, and the proposed project would not be susceptible to increased risks due to expansion. Nonetheless, the proposed project would be designed and constructed in accordance with all applicable design and engineering standards set forth in the incumbent version of the CBC. These design considerations were established to help ensure structural integrity regardless of soil considerations. All facets of design and construction would meet the standards established during final engineering, and would adhere to the recommendations outlined in the site-specific Geotechnical Exploration Report (Appendix E). Therefore, impacts associated with expansive soils would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. e) Would the project have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative waste water disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of waste water? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found no impacts associated with soils and septic tanks/alternative wastewater systems would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project would be served by the municipal sewer system and would not require septic tanks or alternative wastewater systems. Therefore, no impacts associated with soils and septic tanks/alternative wastewater systems would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 95 May 2016 3.6.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to geology and soils. 3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions The following analysis is based, in part, on the March 2016 CalEEMod greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions modeling conducted by Dudek and included as Appendix B of this document. a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. Specifically, the SEIR found that the project evaluated in the SEIR would generate substantially more GHG emissions compared to the adopted PTMLUP and would cumulatively contribute to climate change impacts in California. Even with the incorporation of mitigation measures recommended in the SEIR (see Section 3.7.1 of this document), impacts were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. GHGs are gases that absorb infrared radiation in the atmosphere. The greenhouse effect is a natural process that contributes to regulating the Earth’s temperature. Global climate change concerns focus on whether human activities are leading to an enhancement of the greenhouse effect. Principal GHGs include carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), O3, and water vapor. If the atmospheric concentrations of GHGs rise, the average temperature of the lower atmosphere will gradually increase. The effect each GHG has on climate change is measured as a combination of the mass of its emissions and the potential of a gas or aerosol to trap heat in the atmosphere, known as its global warming potential, which varies among GHGs. Total GHG emissions are expressed as a function of how much warming would be caused by the same mass of CO2. Thus, GHG Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 96 May 2016 emissions are typically measured in terms of pounds or tons of CO2 equivalent (CO2E) and are typically quantified in metric tons (MT) or million metric tons (MMT).1 Global climate change is a cumulative impact, and a project’s incremental GHG contribution can be cumulatively considerable. Thus, GHG impacts are recognized as exclusively cumulative impacts; there are no non-cumulative GHG emissions impacts from a climate change perspective (CAPCOA 2008). This approach is consistent with that recommended by the California Natural Resource Agency, which noted in its Public Notice for the proposed CEQA amendments that the evidence indicates in most cases that the impact of GHG emissions should be considered in the context of a cumulative impact, rather than a project-level impact (CNRA 2009a). Similarly, the Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action for amendments to the CEQA Guidelines confirms that an environmental impact report or other environmental document must analyze the incremental contribution of a project to GHG levels and determine whether those emissions are cumulatively considerable (CNRA 2009b). Neither the State of California nor the SCAQMD has adopted emissions-based thresholds for GHGs that would be applicable to the proposed project. The Governor’s Office of Planning and Research issued a technical advisory titled CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act Review, which states that “public agencies are encouraged but not required to adopt thresholds of significance for environmental impacts. Even in the absence of clearly defined thresholds for GHG emissions, the law requires that such emissions from CEQA projects must be disclosed and mitigated to the extent feasible whenever the lead agency determines that the project contributes to a significant, cumulative climate change impact” (OPR 2008). Furthermore, the advisory document indicates that “in the absence of regulatory standards for GHG emissions or other scientific data to clearly define what constitutes a ‘significant impact,’ individual lead agencies may undertake a project-by-project analysis, consistent with available guidance and current CEQA practice” (OPR 2008). Such an approach is also consistent with CEQA’s provisions regarding the analysis of GHG impacts (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.4). Additionally, the state adopted Senate Bill 375 and 1 The CO2E for a gas is derived by multiplying the mass of the gas by the associated global warming potential (GWP), such that metric tons of CO2E = (metric tons of a GHG) × (GWP of the GHG). CalEEMod assumes that the GWP for CH4 is 21, which means that emissions of 1 metric ton of CH4 are equivalent to emissions of 21 metric tons of CO2, and the GWP for N2O is 310, based on the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change’s (IPCC) Second Assessment Report. Although the IPCC has released subsequent Assessment Reports with updated GWPs, CARB reporting and other statewide documents use the GWP in the IPCC Second Assessment Report. As such, it is appropriate to use the hardwired GWP values in CalEEMod from the IPCC Second Assessment Report. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 97 May 2016 Assembly Bill (AB) 32, which both provide guidelines and requirements relative to regional GHG emissions. The SCAQMD has evaluated and recommended numeric CEQA significance thresholds for GHG emissions for lead agencies to use in assessing GHG impacts of residential and commercial development projects; however, the proposed thresholds have yet to be formally adopted. In October 2008, the SCAQMD presented to the Governing Board the Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas Significance Threshold (SCAQMD 2008), which explores various approaches for establishing a significance threshold for GHG emissions. From December 2008 to September 2010, the SCAQMD hosted working group meetings and revised the draft threshold proposal several times, although it did not officially provide these proposals in a subsequent document. The most recent working group meeting, on September 28, 2010, proposed two options lead agencies can select from to screen thresholds of significance for GHG emissions in residential and commercial projects, and proposes to expand the industrial threshold to other industrial projects (SCAQMD 2010). Option 1 proposed a threshold of 3,000 metric tons (MT) of CO2E per year for all residential and commercial projects, and Option 2 proposed a threshold value by land-use type where the numeric threshold is 3,500 MT CO2E per year for residential projects, 1,400 MT CO2E per year for commercial projects, 3,000 MT CO2E per year for mixed use projects, and 10,000 MT CO2E per year for industrial projects (SCAQMD 2010). The screening thresholds were envisioned as Tier III in the SCAQMD’s proposed threshold guidance; if the project would exceed the applied screening thresholds, an analysis per Tier IV could be conducted. Tier IV of the SCAQMD’s proposed guidance includes performance standards, including an efficiency metric threshold. An efficiency metric, or “service population” threshold, that assesses the GHG efficiency of a project on a per-capita basis where a project’s service population refers to a project’s residents plus employees that would be generated by the project’s development. This efficiency metric threshold is expressed as MT CO2E per service population per year. The SCAQMD proposed an efficiency metric threshold of 4.6 MT CO2E per service population per year for project-level analyses (land use emissions only) and 6.6 MT CO2E per service population per year for plan-level analyses (including all sources of emissions) (SCAQMD 2010). The 2008 guidance document and following working group meeting documents, including the working group meetings that proposed the screening thresholds and efficiency metric thresholds, have not been adopted or approved by the Governing Board; however, many lead agencies apply the methodology recommended in the Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 98 May 2016 guidance document when appropriate. Per the SCAQMD guidance, construction emissions should be amortized over the operational life of a project, which is assumed to be 30 years (SCAQMD 2008). Accordingly, the following analysis adds amortized construction emissions to the estimated annual operational emissions. SEIR No. 339 determined that the previously analyzed project would further increase GHG emissions compared to the adopted PTMLUP, but the per-capita emissions would decrease. However, the previously analyzed project would emit a substantial amount of GHG emissions, which was considered to be significant and unavoidable. Short-Term Construction GHG Emissions Construction of the proposed project would result in GHG emissions, primarily associated with use of off-road construction equipment, on-road hauling and vendor trucks, and worker vehicles. CalEEMod was used to calculate the annual GHG emissions based on the construction scenario described in Section 3.3, Air Quality. The GHG emissions are expressed in units of MT CO2E. On-site sources of GHG emissions include off-road equipment and off-site sources, including hauling and vendor trucks and worker vehicles. Table 3.7-1, Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions, and Table 3.7-2, Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Activity shows construction emissions for the proposed project from on-site and off-site emission sources. Table 3.7-1 Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions Year MT CO2 MT CH4 MT N2O MT CO2E 2016 77.95 0.01 0.00 78.24 2017 1,280.71 0.14 0.00 1,283.87 2018 1,857.57 0.17 0.00 1,861.32 2019 760.76 0.08 0.00 834.44 2020 425.96 0.04 0.00 426.80 Total Emissions 4,402.95 0.43 0.00 4,484.67 See Appendix B for detailed results. MT = metric tons; CO2 = carbon dioxide; CH4 = methane; N2O = nitrous oxide; CO2E = carbon dioxide equivalent Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 99 May 2016 Table 3.7-2 Estimated Annual Construction Greenhouse Gas Emissions by Activity Activity MT CO2 MT CH4 MT N2O MT CO2E Phase I and II Demolition 74.31 0.01 0.00 74.58 Site Preparation 17.96 >0.01 0.00 18.07 Grading 213.35 0.03 0.00 214.04 Trenching 91.73 0.03 0.00 92.30 Building Construction 2,027.36 0.17 0.00 2,031.14 Paving 32.75 0.01 0.00 32.95 Architectural Coating 17.17 >0.01 0.00 17.19 Subtotal 2,474.63 0.25 0.00 2,480.27 Phase III Building Construction 1,903.97 0.18 0.00 1,980.20 Architectural Coating 18.73 >0.01 0.00 18.75 Subtotal 1,928.32 0.18 0.00 1,980.02 Total Emissions 4,402.95 0.43 0.00 4,484.67 See Appendix B for detailed results. MT = metric tons; CO2 = carbon dioxide; CH4 = methane; N2O = nitrous oxide; CO2E = carbon dioxide equivalent As shown in Table 3.7-1 and Table 3.7-2, the estimated combined total GHG emissions generated during construction of the proposed project would be approximately 4,485 MT CO2E. Estimated project-generated construction emissions amortized over 30 years would be approximately 149 MT CO2E per year. As with project-generated construction air quality pollutant emissions, GHG emissions generated during construction of the proposed project would be temporary, lasting only for the duration of the construction period, and they would not represent a long-term source of GHG emissions. Because there is no separate GHG threshold for construction, the evaluation of significance is based on SCAQMD recommendation that construction GHG emissions be amortized over a 30-year period and added to its operational emission estimates as discussed in the operational emissions analysis below. Long-Term Operational GHG Emissions Operation of the project would result in GHG emissions from vehicular traffic, area sources (natural gas combustion, landscaping), electrical generation, water supply, and solid waste. Annual GHG emissions from these sources were estimated using CalEEMod. Annual electricity emissions were estimated using the emission factors for Anaheim Public Utilities, which would provide electricity for the proposed project. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 100 May 2016 The proposed project would result in GHG emissions associated with vehicular traffic generated by the proposed project. According to the project’s Traffic Impact Study (Appendix I), total project-generated daily traffic is estimated to be 7,252 trips for the apartments, 436 trips for the retail uses, and 426 trips for the live/work uses. CalEEMod default mobile source data, including temperature, trip characteristics, variable start information, emission factors, and trip distances, were conservatively used for the model inputs. Project-related traffic was assumed to consist of a mixture of vehicles in accordance with the model outputs for traffic. Operational emissions were modeled in CalEEMod under the assumption that proposed project’s first full year of operation would occur in 2021 (note that while construction of the proposed project is scheduled to be completed in 2020, and although the proposed project would operate starting in 2018, 2021 represents the first full calendar year of operational activities). CalEEMod was also used to estimate emissions from the proposed project’s area sources, which includes operation of gasoline-powered landscape maintenance equipment, which produce minimal GHG emissions, and emissions associated with hearths. CalEEMod default values for hearths were updated based on SCAQMD Rule 445, which prohibits the installation of wood burning devices in new development. The modeling conservatively assumed that approximately 87% of the residential units would have natural gas fireplaces and the remaining 13% of residential units would not have fireplaces. This represents a conservative assumption because the apartment units will not include fireplaces, and fireplace will be limited to a maximum of eight common area fireplaces per phase. As discussed in SEIR No. 339, the approved project was required to show a 10% exceedance above Title 24 energy efficiency requirements through implementation of Mitigation Measures 2-6, 10-21, 10-22, and 10-24, which includes compliance with the California Energy Efficiency Standards, by incorporating energy-efficient roofing, cool pavement materials, and energy-saving devices that meet the Building and Energy Efficiency Standards, and providing electric vehicle charging stations for commercial uses. These mitigation measures would be applicable for the proposed project. The project analyzed in the SEIR was also required to incorporate water-efficient features to reduce indoor and outdoor water consumption through the implementation of high- efficiency and low-water-use fixtures and irrigation systems. Accordingly, these features would also be required for the proposed project. The proposed project would generate solid waste and would, thus, result in CO2E emissions associated with landfill off-gassing. CalEEMod default values for solid waste generation were used to estimate GHG emissions associated with solid waste. The project Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 101 May 2016 would be required to comply with AB 341 (Chesbro, Chapter 476, Statutes of 2011), which would result in a 75% solid waste diversion rate (25% increase from the solid waste diversion requirements of AB 939, Integrated Waste Management Act). However, solid waste diversion was conservatively not assumed in this analysis. The estimated operational GHG emissions from electricity usage, motor vehicles, solid waste generation, water consumption, and wastewater treatment associated with the project were estimated and are shown in Table 3.7-3, Estimated Annual Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Table 3.7-3 Estimated Annual Operational Greenhouse Gas Emissions Emission Source MT CO2 MT CH4 MT N2O MT CO2E Area Sources (Landscaping Equipment, Hearths) 244.92 0.03 >0.01 246.67 Energy (Electricity and Natural Gas) 4,879.49 0.10 0.03 4,889.08 Mobile Sources 6,331.87 0.30 0.00 6,336.68 Solid Waste 104.90 6.20 0.00 235.11 Water and Wastewater 1,153.32 2.48 0.06 1,224.60 Combined Emissions 12,714.50 9.11 0.09 12,932.14 Emissions Plus Amortized Construction Emissions (in metric tons)1 13,081.63 See Appendix B for detailed results. MT = metric tons; CO2 = carbon dioxide; CH4 = methane; N2O = nitrous oxide; CO2E = carbon dioxide equivalent 1 Estimated project-generated construction emissions amortized over 30 years would be approximately 142 MT CO2E per year. As shown in Table 3.7-3, the estimated build-out project-generated GHG emissions during operational year 2020 would be approximately 13,082 MT CO2E per year, including amortized construction emissions. As such, annual operational GHG emissions with amortized construction emissions would exceed the SCAQMD threshold of 3,000 MT CO2E per year for mixed-used development. Even with incorporation of applicable mitigation outlined in SEIR No. 339 and restated in Section 3.7.1 of this document, impacts associated with generation of GHG emissions would exceed the SCAQMD GHG threshold for mixed-use development. Therefore, the proposed project would cumulatively contribute to significant and unavoidable impacts as a result of the generation of GHG emissions. This significance finding is consistent with the determination made in SEIR No. 339 for impacts related to climate change. No new impact or increase in the severity of an identified impact would occur with implementation of the proposed project. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 102 May 2016 b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted for reducing the emissions of GHGs to be less than significant. In particular, the SEIR found that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project was consistent with statewide and regional GHG reductions goals. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The Climate Change Scoping Plan, approved by CARB on December 12, 2008, provides a framework for actions to reduce California’s GHG emissions and requires CARB and other state agencies to adopt regulations and other initiatives to reduce GHGs. As such, the Scoping Plan is not directly applicable to specific projects (CARB 2008). Moreover, the Final Statement of Reasons for the 2010 amendments to the CEQA Guidelines reiterates the statement in the Initial Statement of Reasons that “[t]he Scoping Plan may not be appropriate for use in determining the significance of individual projects because it is conceptual at this stage and relies on the future development of regulations to implement the strategies identified in the Scoping Plan” (CNRA 2009b). The First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan was approved by the CARB Board on May 22, 2014. The Scoping Plan Update builds on the initial Scoping Plan with new strategies and recommendations. The Scoping Plan Update identifies opportunities to leverage existing and new funds to further drive GHG emission reductions through strategic planning and targeted low carbon investments, defines CARB’s climate change priorities for the next 5 years, and sets the groundwork to reach California’s long-term climate goals (CARB 2014b). Under the Scoping Plan and the Scoping Plan Update, however, there are several state regulatory measures aimed at the identification and reduction of GHG emissions. CARB and other state agencies have adopted many of the measures identified in the Scoping Plan. Most of these measures focus on area source emissions (e.g., energy usage, high–global warming potential GHGs in consumer products) and changes to the vehicle fleet (hybrid, electric, and more fuel-efficient vehicles) and associated fuels, and are not directly applicable to the proposed project. As shown in Table 3.7-4, the proposed project would not conflict with the recommendations of AB 32. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 103 May 2016 Table 3.7-4 Scoping Plan Reduction Measures Scoping Plan Reduction Measures Project Consistency 1. California Cap-and-Trade Program Linked to Western Climate Initiative. Implement a broad- based California Cap-and-Trade program to provide a firm limit on emissions. Link the California Cap- and-Trade program with other Western Climate Initiative Partner programs to create a regional market system to achieve greater environmental and economic benefits for California. Ensure California’s program meets all applicable AB 32 requirements for market-based mechanisms. Not applicable. When this cap-and-trade system begins, products or services (such as electricity) would be covered and the cost of the cap-and-trade system would be transferred to the consumers. 2. California Light-Duty Vehicle Greenhouse Gas Standards. Implement adopted standards and planned second phase of the program. Align zero- emission vehicle, alternative and renewable fuel and vehicle technology programs with long-term climate change goals. Consistent. This is a statewide measure that cannot be implemented by a project applicant or lead agency. However, the standards would be applicable to the light-duty vehicles that would access the project site. 3. Energy Efficiency. Maximize energy efficiency building and appliance standards; pursue additional efficiency including new technologies, policy, and implementation mechanisms. Pursue comparable investment in energy efficiency from all retail providers of electricity in California. Consistent. This is a measure for the state to increase its energy efficiency standards in new buildings. The project would be required to build to the new standards and would increase its energy efficiency through compliance. 4. Renewable Portfolio Standard. Achieve 33 percent renewable energy mix statewide. Renewable energy sources include (but are not limited to) wind, solar, geothermal, small hydroelectric, biomass, anaerobic digestion, and landfill gas. Consistent. This is a statewide measure that cannot be implemented by a project applicant or lead agency. The City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department is required to increase its percent of power supply from renewable sources to 33 percent by the year 2020 pursuant to various regulations. 5. Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Develop and adopt the Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Consistent. This is a statewide measure that cannot be implemented by a project applicant or lead agency. When this measure goes into effect, the standard would be applicable to the fuel used by vehicles that would access the project site. 6. Regional Transportation-Related Greenhouse Gas Targets. Develop regional greenhouse gas emissions reduction targets for passenger vehicles. This measure refers to SB 375. Consistent. SB 375 has no requirements that apply directly to development projects; however, the development and density proposed by the project will contribute to achieving SB 375 regional targets. 7. Vehicle Efficiency Measures. Implement light-duty vehicle efficiency measures. Not applicable. When this measure is initiated, the standards would be applicable to the light-duty vehicles that would access the project site. 8. Goods Movement. Implement adopted regulations for the use of shore power for ships at berth. Improve efficiency in goods movement activities. Not applicable. The project does not propose any changes to maritime, rail, or intermodal facilities or other forms of transportation. 9. Million Solar Roofs Program. Install 3,000 MW of solar-electric capacity under California’s existing solar programs. Consistent. This measure is to increase solar throughout California, the proposed project would comply with Title 24, which requires new buildings to be “solar ready.” The project would not preclude the implementation of this strategy. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 104 May 2016 Table 3.7-4 Scoping Plan Reduction Measures Scoping Plan Reduction Measures Project Consistency 10. Medium/Heavy-Duty Vehicles. Adopt medium and heavy-duty vehicle efficiency measures. Not applicable. This is a statewide measure that cannot be implemented by a project applicant or lead agency. The standards phase-in over model years 2014 through 2018 are applicable to the vehicles that would access the project site. 11. Industrial Emissions. Require assessment of large industrial sources to determine whether individual sources within a facility can cost-effectively reduce greenhouse gas emissions and provide other pollution reduction co-benefits. Reduce greenhouse gas emissions from fugitive emissions from oil and gas extraction and gas transmission. Adopt and implement regulations to control fugitive methane emissions and reduce flaring at refineries. Not applicable. The project does not include the development of industrial uses. 12. High Speed Rail. Support implementation of a high- speed rail system. Not applicable. This is a statewide measure that cannot be implemented by a project applicant or lead agency. The project would not preclude the implementation of this strategy. 13. Green Building Strategy. Expand the use of green building practices to reduce the carbon footprint of California’s new and existing inventory of buildings. Consistent. The project would comply with the California Energy Code, and thus incorporate applicable energy efficiency features designed to reduce the proposed project’s energy consumption. 14. High Global Warming Potential Gases. Adopt measures to reduce high global warming potential gases. Consistent. This measure is applicable to the high global warming potential gases that would be used by sources with large equipment (such as in air conditioning and commercial refrigerators). 15. Recycling and Waste. Reduce methane emissions at landfills. Increase waste diversion, composting, and commercial recycling. Move toward zero waste. Consistent. The project would utilize the City of Anaheim recycling services. 16. Sustainable Forests. Preserve forest sequestration and encourage the use of forest biomass for sustainable energy generation. Not applicable. The project site is not forested; therefore, no preservation is possible. 17. Water. Continue efficiency programs and use cleaner energy sources to move and treat water. Consistent. The project would comply with Green Building Code regulations and would implement required water conservation features. 18. Agriculture. In the near-term, encourage investment in manure digesters and at the 5-year Scoping Plan update determine if the program should be made mandatory by 2020. Not applicable. The project site is not designated or in use for agriculture purposes. Source: CARB 2008. While not directly applicable to the project, the City has adopted the Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan: Sustainable Electric and Water Initiatives in July 2015. The City used input provided by the City’s residents to determine what the City has accomplished as of 2015 and identifies goals for reducing emissions for 2020 and 2030. In order for the City to meet the AB 32 state-mandated goal of 30% decline in emissions from 1990 levels by 2020, the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department plans to deliver at least 20% of its retail energy requirements with energy from renewable energy resources by 2020 and 40% Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 105 May 2016 by 2030. Their GHG reduction plan also identifies emission reductions from other activities or programs within City including energy and water, solar energy, and transportation. The City’s General Plan Green Element does not explicitly address GHG emissions or global climate change, but it does include goals and policies to reduce GHG emissions and the City’s cumulative impact to global climate change. Although goals and policies may not be directly applicable to the proposed project, the Green Element provides the City direction and guidance by making the best conservation, transportation, and land use choices for future development. Topics that are addressed in the Green Element include conservation of natural resources, reducing the amount of vehicle-generated emissions, reducing vehicle worker trips, sound land use development, providing clean-burning public transportation, energy conservation, waste management and recycling, and building performance standards. SCAG’s Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS) is a regional growth-management strategy that targets per-capita GHG reductions from passenger vehicles and light-duty trucks in Southern California. The 2012 RTP/SCS incorporates local land-use projections and circulation networks from city and county general plans (SCAG 2012). The RTP/SCS is not directly applicable to the proposed project because the overall purpose of the RTP/SCS is to provide guidance for making future transportation and land use decisions within Southern California. Additionally, development of the project site would support the overarching intent of the RTP/SCS by avoiding sprawling development and incorporating energy-efficient features for such things as landscaping and irrigation. The proposed project would be constructed in compliance with the California Title 24 and CBC requirements, ensuring that the project would be built consistent with current energy-efficient standards. In addition, SEIR No. 339 proposed various mitigation measures that would implement “green” or sustainable building strategies. The proposed project would also be required to implement all applicable mitigation measures from SEIR No. 339 to reduce GHG emissions, and restated in Section 3.7.1 of this document. Therefore, the project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation adopted to reduce GHG emissions, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 106 May 2016 3.7.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measures related to air quality, transportation and traffic, and utilities and services systems, which were determined to also reduce GHG emissions and to be consistent with the California Attorney General’s mitigation measures for energy efficiency, water conservation and efficiency, solid waste reduction, and transportation and motor vehicle usage. Energy Efficiency MM 2-6 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property owner/architect shall submit energy calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Department that shows each new structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall show the following: a. Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building materials and suppliers can be found at the following website: http://energy.lbl.gov/coolroof/ or other similar websites. b. Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways not within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool pavement materials are available at: http://www.epa.gov/heat-islands/using-cool-pavements-reduce-heat- islands or other similar websites. c. Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances (e.g., EnergyStar® appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or double-paned windows. d. Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing over 50,000 square feet. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 107 May 2016 e. Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the building structure to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and office buildings. MM 10-21 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that each structure will exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department Business and Community Programs Division. This consultation shall take place during project design in order to review Title 24 measures that are incorporated into the project design energy efficient practices and allow potential system alternatives such as thermal energy storage air condition, lighting, and building envelope options. Plans submitted for building permits shall show the proposed energy efficiencies and systems alternatives. MM 10-22 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance with Title 24, which may include the following:  High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.  Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.  Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.  Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.  Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.  Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air handling units, and fan-coil units).  Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.  Use of compact fluorescent lamps.  Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.  Use of EnergyStar® exit lighting or exit signage.  Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 108 May 2016  Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high- pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots.  Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods.  Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems. o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 kW or $0.15 per kWh saved for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency that exceed Title 24 requirements. o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.  Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush (gpf) or less).  Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).  Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.  Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping. MM 10-24 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans for review and approval which shall ensure that buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code) by a minimum of 10 percent. Water Conservation and Efficiency MM 10-7 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:  Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible; Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 109 May 2016  Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash down of exterior areas;  Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals;  Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;  Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors;  Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;  Low-flow shower heads in hotels;  Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;  Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are lowest;  Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using appliances;  Cooling tower recirculating system;  Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;  Use of waterway recirculation systems;  Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation; and  Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available. In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans. MM 10-9 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures). MM 10-12 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 110 May 2016 MM 10-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient appliances. MM 10-14 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines for recycled water. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. Solid Waste Reduction MM 2-3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials. These plans shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project site. MM 10-18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at its discretion, the following plan components:  Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 111 May 2016  Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.  Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.  Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection.  Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible.  Prohibiting curbside pick-up.  Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and city regulations. MM 10-19 Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer:  Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.  Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.  Collection of office paper for recycling.  Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. MM 10-20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a Demolition and Import/Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 112 May 2016 Transportation and Motor Vehicle Usage MM 2-5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational CO, NOX, ROG [reactive organic gas], and PM10 emissions:  Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 2010 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall be implemented as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager.  The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site frontage routes as needed. MM 9-1 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building with commercial, office, and/or institutional uses, the property owners/developer shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office. Objectives of the TDM program shall be:  Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.  Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project- generated trips.  Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership. MM 9-2 Prior to the first Final Building and Zoning inspection for each building with commercial, office, or institutional uses, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and approval a menu of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, to include, but not be limited to, the list below. The property owner/developer shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 113 May 2016 ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation.  On-site services such as the food, retail, and other services be provided.  Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.  Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs.  Transit Pass. Southern California Rapid Transit District and Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes be promoted through financial assistance and on-site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region.  Shuttle Service. A commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project be generated, and a local shuttle program offered to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile.  Bicycling. A Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers be provided as part of this program, Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options.  Guaranteed Ride Home Program. A program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.  Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. An incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.  Stagger work shifts.  Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees.  Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem). Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 114 May 2016  Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work.  Access. Preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles may be provided.  Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. (Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.)  Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Employees offered financial incentives for bicycling to work.  Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Ticket/passes to special events, vacation, etc. be offered to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs.  Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. Every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact who will be responsible for coordinating with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on-site coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the project with the ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. MM 9-15 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 115 May 2016 3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials The following analysis is based, in part, on the July 2015 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by Vertex and included as Appendix F of this document. a) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Short-Term Construction Impacts During construction of the proposed project, hazardous and potentially hazardous materials typically associated with construction activities would be routinely transported and used on the project site. These hazardous materials could include gasoline, diesel fuel, lubricants, and other products used to operate and maintain construction equipment. The transport, use, and handling of these materials would be a temporary activity coinciding with project construction. Although such materials may be stored on the project site, any transport, use, and handling of these materials is expected to be limited to quantities and concentrations required to operate and maintain equipment. Removal and disposal of any hazardous materials from the project site during construction would be conducted by a permitted and licensed service provider. Any handling, transport, use, or disposal would comply with all applicable federal, state, and local agencies and regulations, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, the California Department of Toxic Substances Control, the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), the California Occupational Safety and Health Administration, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the Orange County Environmental Health Division (the Certified Unified Program Agency for Orange County), and the Orange County Fire Authority. Additionally, as mandated by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, all hazardous materials stored on site would be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Sheet, which would inform on-site personnel about the necessary remediation procedures in the case of accidental release. Additionally, a Phase I ESA (Appendix F) was prepared to evaluate the potential for contamination of the project site under existing conditions. The Phase I ESA identified Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 116 May 2016 various activities and uses associated with the former on-site operations that required further evaluation based on their potential to be considered a recognized environmental condition (REC). A REC refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property that were the result of release to the environment; are under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or are under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The Phase I ESA (Appendix F) did not identify any RECs that could adversely affect on-site construction workers, residents, employees, or the general public. Although no RECs were identified either on or adjacent to the project site, based on the previous on-site industrial activities and uses, soil management (e.g., soil profiling, handling, disposal) in accordance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations would occur during construction activities. Therefore, based on the above, short-term construction impacts associated with the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Long-Term Operational Impacts Hazardous and potentially hazardous materials would likely also be transported and used on the project site during operation of the proposed project, primarily for housekeeping and maintenance activities. The types of these materials would vary greatly, but would generally include household cleaning products, paints, fertilizers, and herbicides and pesticides. Many of these materials are considered Household Hazardous Wastes, Common Wastes, and/or Universal Wastes by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which considers these types of wastes to be common to businesses and households and to pose a lower risk to people and the environment than other hazardous wastes when properly handled, transported, used, and disposed of. Federal, state, and local regulations allow these types of wastes to be handled and disposed of with less stringent standards than other hazardous wastes, and many of these wastes do not have to be managed as hazardous waste. In addition, any hazardous materials would be limited in quantity and concentrations, consistent with other similar commercial and residential communities in the City, and any handling, transport, use, and disposal would comply with applicable federal, state, and local agencies and regulations. Additionally, as mandated by the U.S. Occupational Safety and Health Administration, all hazardous materials stored on site would be accompanied by a Material Safety Data Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 117 May 2016 Sheet, which would inform on-site personnel about the necessary remediation procedures in the case of accidental release. Further, the Anaheim Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Section, administers and implements a Hazardous Materials Management Program within the City as a Certified Unified Program Agency authorized by the California Environmental Protection Agency. The Anaheim Fire Department, Hazardous Materials Section, regulates and enforces the requirements of the Uniform Fire Code relating to hazardous materials, including the use and storage of materials that are ignitable, reactive, corrosive, or toxic. Businesses using such materials are subject to permitting and inspection. Therefore, based on the above, long-term operational impacts associated with the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with the release of hazardous materials to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.8(a), above. c) Would the project emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with emitting or handling hazardous emissions and materials within 0.25 mile of a school to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. SEIR No. 339 identified Paul Revere Elementary School at 140 West Guinida Lane and Ponderosa Elementary School near Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street as nearby schools within 0.25 mile of the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the SEIR identified the Anaheim City Unified School District’s Family Oasis at 131 West Midway Drive and Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 118 May 2016 the Facilities and Operations Center at 1411 South Anaheim Boulevard as nearby schools within 0.25 mile of the Platinum Triangle. However, although these schools are located within 0.25 mile of the Platinum Triangle, none of them are located within 0.25 of the project site. In addition to the proposed project being located outside of a 0.25-mile radius of a school, the proposed project would not emit air toxics that would require a permit from SCAQMD. Also, any handling, transport, use, and disposal of hazardous or potentially hazardous materials, including household hazardous wastes, would comply with applicable federal, state, and local agencies and regulations. Therefore, impacts associated with emitting or handling hazardous emissions and materials within 0.25 mile of a school would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. d) Would the project be located on a site that is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with hazardous materials sites to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. A review of federal, state, and tribal environmental databases related to the project site was conducted to identify potential RECs. The review included an environmental database search for the surrounding area (1-mile radius). Properties that have or may have the potential for existing or future site contamination, environmental liabilities, or contamination migration to surrounding areas were identified in the database search. Information from these various databases were compiled in the Phase I ESA (Appendix F). The project site was identified on the following regulatory databases (Appendix F):  D&F Industries was listed on the HAZNET database for disposal of “other organic solids” and “other inorganic solid waste” from the project site in 1995, and disposal of hazardous materials from the site from 1996–2003, including aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10%; unspecified solvent mixture; unspecified aqueous solution; laboratory waste chemicals; oxygenated solvents (e.g., acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate); laboratory waste chemicals; waste oil and mixed oil; and off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. In 2000, Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 119 May 2016 D&F Industries was listed for disposal of 0.16 tons of halogenated solvents (e.g., chloroform, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene). D&F Industries was also listed on the EMI database for emissions of total organic hydrocarbon gases and reactive organic gases at the project site in 1996. Although D&F Industries was listed for disposal of 0.16 tons of an unspecified halogenated solvent in 2000, this listing is not considered a REC based on the single year of reported disposal, the limited quantity of solvent usage recorded, and the lack of reported releases or violations associated with the facility.  From 2002 to 2011, NBTY Manufacturing was listed on the HAZNET database for disposal of hazardous materials, including aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10%; hydrocarbon solvents; other inorganic solid waste; unspecified oil containing waste; other organic solids; liquids with pH<=2; alkaline solution (pH>=12.5) with metals; liquids with halogenated organic compounds >=1,000 milligrams per liter; latex waste; unspecified organic liquid mixture; oxygenated solvents (e.g., acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate); unspecified solvent mixture; and off-specification, aged, or surplus inorganics. NBTY Manufacturing was listed in the EMI database for emissions of total organic hydrocarbon, gases, and reactive organic gases at the site in 2001. These listings are not considered a REC based on the lack of reported releases or violations associated with the facility. Overall, the Phase I ESA (Appendix F) did not identify any RECs that could adversely affect on-site construction workers, residents, employees, or the general public. Therefore, based on the above, impacts associated with hazardous materials sites would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with public airport safety hazards would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. SEIR No. 339 found that the Platinum Triangle is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is the area within 2 miles of a public airport. Therefore, no impacts associated Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 120 May 2016 with public airport safety hazards would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with private airstrip safety hazards to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. SEIR No. 339 identified existing locations within the vicinity of the Platinum Triangle that support helicopter takeoffs/landings: the North Net Fire Training Center (244 East Orangewood Avenue), UCI Medical Center (101 The City Drive South), and Angel Stadium (2000 East Gene Autry Way), which is used several times a week by the Anaheim Police Department for training purposes. Additionally, the SEIR found that new heliports/helipads could be constructed in the Platinum Triangle atop new high-rise structures for fire and emergency response use. Nonetheless, the SEIR concluded that, given the flight patterns used by helicopters for these locations, the proposed project would not expose future residents to hazards associated with operation of nearby heliports/helipads. Therefore, impacts associated with private airstrip/heliport/helipad safety hazards would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. g) Would the project impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with emergency response or evacuation plans to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As discussed in SEIR No. 339, the City of Anaheim has an emergency preparedness plan that complies with state law and interfaces with other cities and counties within Southern California. This plan outlines the operations and activities that would occur in the event of a disaster. It also allows for coordination with other agencies in the event that the City is affected by a disaster elsewhere. The plan addresses a warning system, emergency broadcast system, emergency operations center, and shelter system. The Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 121 May 2016 plan provides a foundation to conduct operations and coordinate critical resources during emergencies. It also provides the framework for how to integrate nongovernmental agencies and organizations that have resources needed to meet emergency requirements into the program. The City also participates in the Standardized Emergency Management System (SEMS). The Governor’s Office of Emergency Services administers SEMS and coordinates multi-agency responses to disasters. SEMS is required by the state and was developed to provide a “common language” for emergency response personnel to request resources and equipment from other agencies. In addition to resource allocation, SEMS was established to minimize the duplication of efforts during emergency response by defining common tactics and identifying a clear chain of command. The SEMS program was developed to respond to incidents as they occur, and does not provide long-term recovery guidelines. Additionally, the proposed project would be required to accommodate emergency vehicles. However, prior to approval of building plans, the AFD would perform an access compliance review and fire and life safety review to prevent implementation impairment of or physical interference with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan. Therefore, impacts associated with emergency response or evacuation plans would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. h) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with wildland fires would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As addressed in SEIR No. 339, the project area is developed, and no undeveloped wildland areas are adjacent to the project area. Therefore, no impacts associated with wildland fires would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 122 May 2016 3.8.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to hazards and hazardous materials. 3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality The following analysis is based, in part, on the January 2016 Conceptual WQMP and January 2016 Drainage Study, both of which were prepared by KHR Associates and included as Appendix G of this document. a) Would the project violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with water quality standards and waste discharge requirements to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Short-Term Construction Impacts Without the appropriate controls in place, on-site stormwater that is allowed to sheet flow off-site can potentially convey various sediments, pollutants, trash, and other constituents downstream, which subsequently can adversely affect the quality of receiving waters. Since construction activities would disturb one or more acres, the proposed project would be subject to the provisions of the NPDES General Construction Permit, consistent with SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 3-2 and state and local requirements. The General Construction Permit requires implementation of a SWPPP. The SWPPP would include project construction features designed to prevent erosion and protect the quality of stormwater runoff (i.e., BMPs). Sediment control BMPs may include stabilized construction entrances, straw wattles on embankments, and sediment filters on existing inlets. Additionally, grading activities would be performed in conformance with the latest version (currently 2013) of the CBC (California Building Standards Commission 2013); Chapter 17.04, Grading, Excavations, Fills, Watercourses, of the Anaheim Municipal Code (City of Anaheim 2016); approved grading plans; and good engineering practices. On-site and off-site stormwater drainage facilities and project site grading would be Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 123 May 2016 designed and constructed per the approved grading plans to prevent undue erosion and excessive deposits of mud, silt, and debris upon or within any public street, stormwater channel, storm drain, swale, or watercourse. Compliance with the requirements set forth in the NPDES General Construction Permit, including preparation of a SWPPP and incorporation of sediment control BMPs, and those provisions established by the Anaheim Municipal Code would reduce the potential for off-site and downstream water quality impacts. Therefore, short-term construction impacts associated with water quality standards would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Long-Term Operational Impacts A WQMP (Appendix G) was prepared for the proposed project to comply with the requirements of the County of Orange NPDES Stormwater Program. As discussed in the WQMP, on-site water quality and stormwater drainage would be addressed through incorporation of infiltration, structural, and non-structural source-control BMPs. Specifically, a new stormwater drainage and treatment system would be constructed within the project site. Under the post-development conditions, stormwater would be collected within the storm drain system by roof drains, area drains, and/or drop inlets. As part of the hydrological modeling, the project site was divided into 14 drainage management areas. Within each drainage management area, the low stormwater flows would be routed to a perforated corrugated steel pipe for infiltration, and the high flows would bypass the treatment system and discharge off-site into the municipal storm drain system. Stormwater runoff from paved parking area would pass through either Modular Wetlands units or Contech StormFilter media vaults for treatment prior to infiltration. Runoff within the public park would be directed to infiltration basins. Stormwater runoff from the disturbed right-of-way areas would be directed into the parkways and infiltrated through bioretention planters. With incorporation of these infiltration, non-structural, and structural source-control BMPs, stormwater originating on the project site, as well as any constituents contained within these surface flows, would be collected and treated in accordance with NPDES requirements, greatly reducing the opportunity for off-site and downstream water quality impacts. Therefore, long-term operational impacts associated with water quality standards would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 124 May 2016 b) Would the project substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (i.e., the production rate of pre-existing nearby wells would drop to a level that would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with groundwater recharge to be less than significant. The SEIR also found impacts related to groundwater supplies to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 3-1 and 3-2. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Groundwater Supplies The City receives its water from two main sources: (1) the Orange County Groundwater Basin (Groundwater Basin), which is the primary source of water for the City and is managed by the Orange County Water District, and (2) imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. Groundwater is pumped from 18 active wells located within the City, and imported water is delivered to the City through seven treated water connections and one untreated connection (City of Anaheim 2011). According to SEIR No. 339, the Groundwater Basin underlays the north half of Orange County beneath broad lowlands, covering an area of approximately 350 square miles. The Groundwater Basin is dominated by a deep structural depression containing a thick accumulation of fresh water bearing imbedded marine and continental sand, silt, and clay deposits. The sediments containing easily recoverable fresh water extend to approximately 2,000 feet in depth. The Groundwater Basin is one of the richest and most plentiful sources of groundwater in the entire state, holding millions of acre-feet of water, of which approximately 1.25 to 1.5 million acre-feet is available for use. To ensure that the Groundwater Basin is not overdrawn, the Orange County Water District continuously monitors the basin, recharging it with local and imported water to maintain safe groundwater levels. Over the years, the production capability of the Groundwater Basin has increased as a result of increased wastewater reclamation and the blending of waters of different qualities to produce high-quality potable water for public distribution. Additionally, the Orange County Water District recently completed expansion of its Groundwater Replenishment System, increasing production from 75 to 100 million gallons per day. This expansion increases the overall reliability of the Groundwater Basin. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 125 May 2016 Although the proposed project would rely on water supplies composed largely of groundwater, all extraction of groundwater for use within the City is actively managed by the Orange County Water District to prevent overdraft, ensure the long-term reliability of the Groundwater Basin, and avoid adverse effects to regional groundwater supplies. Therefore, impacts associated with groundwater supplies would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Groundwater Recharge The project site currently consists of vacant land containing isolated stockpiles of crushed concrete, asphalt, and soils, as well as remnant parking lots and drive aisles. Additional land cover found on the project site is limited to ornamental trees found generally along the project frontages and ruderal grassland vegetation within the footprints of the former buildings. The project site is relatively flat, and the site presently drains via ribbon gutters to either Gene Autry Way or State College Boulevard. Historically, up until the mid- 2000s, the project site had been developed with nine commercial/industrial buildings. As a result of these past and existing conditions, the project site is not considered a significant location for dedicated groundwater recharge. Once operational, the project site would be predominantly composed of paved surfaces and impermeable buildings, and the amount of impervious surfaces would generally remain the same under the post-development conditions. However, the proposed project would also include a new stormwater drainage and treatment system consisting of infiltration basins and bioretention planters. Stormwater flows captured within these features would be allowed to percolate into the subsurface soils and return to the underlying aquifer(s). Therefore, impacts associated with groundwater recharge would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with altering the existing on-site and off-site drainage pattern in a manner that would result in erosion or siltation to be less than significant. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 126 May 2016 Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Under existing conditions, drainage patterns consist of stormwater flows that drain a portion of the project site to the catch basin within the northwest corner of the property, and the remainder of the site sheet flows to the curb face (Appendix G). No natural drainage courses, including streams or rivers, are located on or adjacent to the project site. Once operational, the proposed project would include a new stormwater drainage and treatment system within the project site. Under post-development conditions, stormwater would be collected within the storm drain system by roof drains, area drains, and/or drop inlets. The low stormwater flows would be routed to a perforated corrugated steel pipe for infiltration, and the high flows would bypass the treatment system and discharge off- site into the municipal storm drain system. Stormwater runoff from paved parking area would pass through either Modular Wetlands units or Contech StormFilter media vaults for pretreatment prior to infiltration. Runoff within the public park would be directed to infiltration basins. Stormwater runoff from the disturbed right-of-way areas would be directed into the parkways and infiltrated through bioretention planters. A Drainage Study (Appendix G) was prepared to evaluate the hydrologic effect of the proposed project on local water resources in terms of stormwater quantity and quality. The Drainage Study provides a design analysis for the stormwater drainage facilities proposed, including implementation and maintenance of the proposed infiltration, non- structural, and structural source-control BMPs. The Drainage Study fulfills the requirements of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the Orange County Hydrology Manual, and describes the implementation and maintenance of BMPs to be installed on the project site. Stormwater flows from both 10- and 25-year storm events were modeled as part of the Drainage Study. Hydrological modeling found that although the amount of impervious surfaces would generally remain the same under post-development conditions, because of the new stormwater drainage and treatment system, which would retain stormwater on the project site for longer durations compared to current conditions, the project site would experience an overall net reduction in peak stormwater discharges during modeled storm events (Appendix G). Although existing, non-natural drainage patterns would be altered as a result of the new stormwater drainage and treatment system, no increase in the volume or flow rate of peak stormwater discharges would occur. The proposed project’s stormwater system was Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 127 May 2016 engineered to collect and treat stormwater originating on the project site, instead of allowing peak stormwater discharges, and any constituents contained within this stormwater. This stormwater would be conveyed off-site, as is the case under existing conditions. Therefore, hydrological impacts associated with altering the existing drainage pattern would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. d) Would the project substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with altering existing on-site and off-site drainage patterns in a manner that would result in flooding to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.9(c), above. e) Would the project create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with stormwater drainage system capacity to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. According to the Drainage Study (Appendix G), commencing near the westerly project boundary on the southerly side of Gene Autry Way and extending west, a 24-inch- diameter reinforced concrete pipe occurs that transitions to a 7-foot by 2-foot reinforced concrete box, which transitions to double 4-foot by 3-foot reinforced concrete boxes. An existing catch basin located along the westerly property line within the northwest corner of the project site connects to the double 4-foot by 3-foot reinforced concrete boxes within the Caltrans right-of -way. Additionally, an existing 48-inch-diameter reinforced concrete pipe in State College Boulevard commences at Artisan Court and extends south. Within the public right-of-way near the southeast corner of the project site is an existing Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 128 May 2016 Filterra stormwater treatment system with adjacent catch basin that connects to the 48- inch-diameter reinforced concrete pipe in State College Boulevard via an 18-inch- diameter reinforced concrete pipe. Stormwater flows from both 10- and 25-year storm events were modeled as part of the Drainage Study (Appendix G). Hydrological modeling found that although the amount of impervious surfaces would generally remain the same under the post-development conditions, because of the new stormwater drainage and treatment system, which would retain stormwater on the project site for longer durations, the project site would experience an overall net reduction in peak stormwater discharges during modeled storm events. Thus, since the proposed project would not result in an increase in peak discharges, implementation of the project could be served by the existing municipal stormwater drainage system. Therefore, impacts associated with stormwater drainage system capacity would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. f) Would the project otherwise substantially degrade water quality? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with degradation of water quality to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Listing a water body as impaired in California is governed by the Water Quality Control Policy for developing California’s Clean Water Act Section 303(d) listing policy. The State Water Resources Control Board and Regional Water Resources Control Boards assess water quality data for California’s waters every 2 years to determine if they contain pollutants at levels that exceed protective water quality criteria and standards. This biennial assessment is required under Section 303(d) of the federal Clean Water Act. According to the WQMP (Appendix G), receiving waters in the proposed project’s watershed consist of the East Garden Grove–Wintersburg Channel, Huntington Harbor, Anaheim Harbor, Santa Ana River (Reach 1), and Pacific Ocean. The first three of these receiving waters are included in the Section 303(d) list of impaired water bodies. As such, any development project that would either directly or indirectly result in a discharge of certain constituents into these listed water bodies would represent an adverse impact. A new stormwater drainage and treatment system would be constructed within the project site. The proposed project’s stormwater system would include infiltration, non-structural, Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 129 May 2016 and structural source-control BMPs, all of which would collect and treat stormwater originating on the project site, as well as any constituents contained within these surface flows, in accordance with NPDES requirements, greatly reducing the opportunity for off- site and downstream water quality impacts. Therefore, impacts associated with degradation of water quality would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. g) Would the project place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with placing housing within a 100-year flood hazard area to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Flood Insurance Rate Map (Panel 06059C0142J) for the project area identifies the project site as being located outside of the 1% Flood Hazard Zone (i.e., 100-year flood hazard zone or 100-year floodplain). The northwestern portion of the project site is within the “0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard” zone (i.e., 500-year flood hazard zone or 500-year floodplain), and the balance of the site occurs within “Area With Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee” zone (FEMA 2009). Additionally, the closest 1% Flood Hazard Zone to the project site (Santa Ana River) is located 0.6 mile to the east, and no 1% Flood Hazard Zone is found in the immediate project area. As such, the proposed project would not place housing within the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, impacts associated with placing housing within a 100- year flood hazard area would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. h) Would the project place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with placing structures within a 100-year flood hazard area to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.9(g), above. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 130 May 2016 i) Would the project expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As discussed in Section 3.9(g), above, the northwestern portion of the project site is within the “0.2% Annual Chance Flood Hazard” zone, and the balance of the site occurs within an “Area With Reduced Flood Risk Due to Levee” zone (FEMA 2009). The existing levee that provides flood protection in the project area is maintained by the Orange County Flood Control District and is regularly inspected to ensure that failure of the levee does not occur. Nonetheless, in the highly unlikely event of a failure that may result in flooding within the project area, the City would implement emergency operation procedures to protect the public health and welfare. Therefore, impacts associated with risk of loss, injury, or death involving flooding would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. j) Inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Due to its inland location, lack of nearby large water body, and relatively flat topography, the potential risk of seiche, tsunami, or mudflow to affect the project area is low. Therefore, no impacts associated with inundation by seiche, tsunami, or mudflow would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.9.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measures related to hydrology and water quality, which are applicable to the proposed project: Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 131 May 2016 MM 3-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans documenting that the design of all aboveground structures (with the exception of parking structures) shall be at least three feet higher than the 100- year flood zone, where applicable, unless otherwise required by the City Engineer. All structures below this level shall be flood-proofed to prevent damage to property or harm to people. MM 3-2 Prior to the initiation of grading activities, for projects greater than one acre, coverage for the project must be obtained by electronically submitting permit registration documents to the State or obtaining coverage via current general construction permit prescribed method by the property owner/developer pursuant to State and Federal National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As part of the Notice of Intent, a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The property owner/developer shall also prepare and submit to the Development Services Division of the Public Works Department, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the City’s municipal NPDES requirements and Chapter 7 of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved prior to issuance of grading permit. The SWPPP, in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the structural and nonstructural best management practices (BMPs) that will be implemented during construction (short- term) within the Project Area as well as BMPs for long-term operation of the Project Area that address potential impacts to surface waters. 3.10 Land Use and Planning a) Would the project physically divide an established community? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found no impacts associated with division of an established community would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The physical division of an established community typically pertains to the construction of a linear feature such as a highway or railroad tracks, or removal of a means of access such as a local road or bridge that would impair mobility within an existing community or between a community and outlying area. The project site is not used as a connection between established communities. Instead, connectivity in the surrounding project area is facilitated via local roadways and pedestrian paths (e.g., sidewalks, trails). Thus, the project site’s development would not impede movement within the project area, within an established community, or from one established community to another. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 132 May 2016 Conversely, the proposed project would promote connectivity in the project area by constructing Union Street and Private Street on the project site, and pedestrian walkways, which would allow residents and the general public to traverse the project site, which they currently cannot. Therefore, no impacts associated with division of an established community would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan, local coastal program, or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with applicable land use plans, policies, and regulations, including those established by the City and SCAG, to be less than significant. However, SEIR No. 339 also concluded that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR was inconsistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Public Services and Facilities Element Goal 8.1, as high-rise residential towers proposed as part of the original A-Town Metro project located north of an existing Southern California Gas Company microwave tower could potentially interfere with the microwave tower telecommunications function. At the time of preparation of SEIR No. 339, the original A-Town Metro was an approved project with a signed Development Agreement, and was not part of the project actions analyzed in the SEIR. Thus, the City could not require any actions on the original A-Town Metro project to reduce impacts to a less-than-significant level. SEIR No. 339 determined that no feasible mitigation measures exist to minimize the potential conflict with the microwave tower’s telecommunication function. Therefore, impacts were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project would require approval of several discretionary actions, including the following:  General Plan Amendment (GPA2015-00506): To relocate and combine two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim’s General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 133 May 2016  Amendment to the PTMLUP (MIS2015-00622): To reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments. Of the various requested discretionary approvals, the proposed General Plan Amendment and PTMLUP Amendments have the most opportunity to result in land use conflicts. Thus, the land use consistency discussion presented in Table 3.10-1 focuses on the applicable goals and policies related to these discretionary actions, as set forth in the City of Anaheim General Plan and the planning principles established in the PTMLUP. Table 3.10-1 Anaheim General Plan and PTMLUP Consistency Table Goal, Policy, or Planning Principle Consistency Discussion Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element Goal 15.1. Establish the Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems and pedestrian promenades. Consistent. The proposed project would implement this goal by creating a community that can be developed successfully in the current and the projected future economic climate while allowing for diverse uses that would permanently “activate” the stretch of Gene Autry Way between State College Boulevard and Union Street in a manner that would help the proposed project thrive through a variety of economic conditions. Additionally, the proposed project was designed using high-quality architecture that would complement the surrounding environment, and would construct a street network that aligns with neighboring developments, including the alignment of Union Street north of Gene Autry Way. The proposed project would provide ample parking to satisfy all Anaheim Municipal Code requirements, and would construct a public park that would provide an enjoyable pedestrian experience and recreational amenities for residents of Jefferson Stadium Park and the surrounding community. Land Use Element Policy 3. Encourage mixed-use projects integrating retail, office and higher density residential land uses. Consistent. The proposed project is a mixed-use development with residential densities that exceed the minimum densities established by the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP) adopted to implement this policy. The project integrates retail and live/work units along Gene Autry Way. Land Use Element Policy 5. Maximize views and recreational and development opportunities afforded by the area's proximity to the Santa Ana River. Consistent. The proposed project’s residential development within this portion of the Platinum Triangle would provide easy bicycle access to the Santa Ana River Trail, allowing residents, employees, and visitors to ride along the Santa Ana River to either the Pacific Ocean or the San Bernardino Mountains. Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Planning Principle 2.1.1. Balance and Integrate Uses. In order to maximize long-term property value, the Platinum Consistent. The uses surrounding the proposed project would be connected through walkable streets, open space, Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 134 May 2016 Table 3.10-1 Anaheim General Plan and PTMLUP Consistency Table Goal, Policy, or Planning Principle Consistency Discussion Triangle will not only provide new, balanced development opportunities for office, residential and sports/entertainment and allow existing industrial uses to continue, but link the various uses together with walkable streets, open space and consistent landscape. Regardless of market strengths for any one use at a given time, the opportunity and value for all uses will be enhanced by a supportive, integrated and multi-use district approach. and compatible landscape design, including the 1.11-acre public park that would be located on the southern end of the property. The use of live/work units and retail along Gene Autry Way would provide an opportunity to develop uses that are complementary to residential on-site uses and surrounding development that can respond to market strengths that may evolve over the project’s lifetime. Planning Principle 2.1.2. Stimulate Market-Driven Development. The Master Land Use Plan is intended to encourage and facilitate and encourage new development within the Platinum Triangle. The PTMU Overlay Zone is designed to guide, not inhibit, current market forces. Development that will lead to strong economic return is encouraged. The growth of housing in the Platinum Triangle will also stimulate high quality office development since few locations within the region allow for office development adjacent to housing and local services. Consistent. The proposed project would bring quality housing to the Platinum Triangle and provide opportunities for local services in the retail space and other employment- generating uses in the live/work units. This would ultimately help catalyze future office and other commercial development as envisioned by this Planning Principle. The retail and live/work units would provide opportunities for an active street front and a pedestrian-oriented community. Planning Principle 2.1.3. Create a Unique, Integrated, Walkable Urban Environment. To achieve the potential of the Platinum Triangle in terms of quality of life and land value, a vibrant, walkable urban environment is required. Comfortable walking environments linking jobs, attractive housing, open space and local services, while reducing the need to drive, are attributes that require guidance and facilitation. It will be essential that each new project make a contribution toward this new urban quality and character. Consistent. A vibrant walkable urban environment would be provided through connector and collector streets linking the surrounding properties to the proposed project and its public park located on the southern end of the property. By providing an active, diverse, and architecturally attractive mixed-use residential and commercial project along Gene Autry Way, and a new public park along the north side of Artisan Court, the project would satisfy this policy’s requirement that it contribute to a comfortable walking environment linking jobs, housing, open space, and local services. Planning Principle 2.1.4. Develop an Overall Urban Design Framework. Ground floor retail, urban parks and street landscape treatments will be more cohesive if combined into a larger planning vision. These elements, along with new street locations, density concentrations and pedestrian linkages are part of the Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan. It is also important to link employment and housing so that each supports and facilitates the other. Consistent. The proposed project follows the larger planning vision for the Platinum Triangle by providing new street locations and pedestrian linkages through the project site, which would create walkable blocks around each of the three residential buildings. The project would be consistent with the amended Urban Design Plan, including the provision of a new public park along Artisan Court. As envisioned by the City of Anaheim (City), the new park, internal streets, and pedestrian network would help transform what used to be a large, inaccessible industrial block into a pedestrian-scale development where residents can walk to work or shopping. Planning Principle 2.1.5 Reinforce Transit Oriented Development Opportunities. The Master Land Use Plan and PTMU Overlay Zone provide opportunities for Transit Oriented Development in close proximity to existing and future rail and bus transportation facilities. Entertainment, retail, high density housing and office are Consistent. The proposed project site is located directly adjacent to a bus station and is within walking distance of the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC). The project’s new high-density housing, which would exceed the minimum densities required by the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone, would Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 135 May 2016 Table 3.10-1 Anaheim General Plan and PTMLUP Consistency Table Goal, Policy, or Planning Principle Consistency Discussion envisioned as potential uses for this emerging new regional activity and mixed use center, situated near the existing Amtrak/Metrolink and the proposed ARTIC stations, The Grove of Anaheim, Angel Stadium of Anaheim and the Honda Center. A loop road connecting Gene Autry Way with Douglass Road could also be provided to facilitate linkages in this area. catalyze this emerging activity center located just west of Angel Stadium of Anaheim. In addition, the development would be located within walking distance to the proposed Anaheim Rapid Connection, which would connect ARTIC, the Grove of Anaheim, the Platinum Triangle Districts, and other regional centers. Together, these urban areas, walkable streets, and railway resources would allow residents, employees, and visitors to reduce their dependence on cars and better use the City’s burgeoning transit opportunities. Planning Principle 2.1.6. Maintain and Enhance Connectivity. The linkage between The Anaheim Resort and the Platinum Triangle will be enhanced, connecting key activity centers including Angel Stadium of Anaheim, The Grove of Anaheim, the Honda Center, the Anaheim Convention Center and The Disneyland Resort. On a more local level, emerging neighborhoods will be connected by a newly expanded functional and convenient street network and pedestrian walkways. The system will allow high capacity event-based networks to work in conjunction with an everyday, pedestrian- friendly local circulation system. Consistent. The proposed project follows the larger planning vision for the Platinum Triangle by providing new street locations and pedestrian linkages through the project site. The proposed project would enhance north/south and east/west connectivity by accommodating the future completion of Artisan Court and constructing two new north/south streets. This expanded street network would create an every-day, pedestrian-friendly local circulation system, consistent with this Policy’s requirements. The project would also maintain the region’s high-capacity events- based transportation networks. Planning Principle 2.1.7 Create Great Neighborhoods. A major goal of the Master Land Use Plan is to create long lasting neighborhoods that maintain their value and socio-economic vitality. Therefore, the plan provides a fundamentally strong and appropriately scaled framework of blocks, streets, and open space. In addition, service providers will be encouraged to locate their facilities within the Platinum Triangle, based on resident need and site availability. These services may include library facilities, schools, day care centers and locations for community and/or religious assembly. Only by providing these essentials can a really rich, sustainable urbanity be achieved. Consistent. The proposed project follows the larger planning vision for the Platinum Triangle by providing new street locations and pedestrian linkages through the project site, as well as a public park on the southern end of the site. This would fulfill this Policy’s requirement of providing “a fundamentally strong and appropriately scaled framework of blocks, streets, and open space.” The project would further create a great neighborhood by providing opportunities for a variety of employment and neighborhood-serving retail locations for the benefit of the new Jefferson Stadium Park community. Finally, the proposed project would create high- quality on-site amenities for residents of the new neighborhood, such as internal courtyards, clubhouses, and fitness centers. Planning Principle 2.1.8 Provide for Installation and Maintenance of Public Improvements. Financial Mechanisms (such as the approved Community Facilities District and a potential Assessment District) will be established to provide for an equitable contribution towards installation and long term maintenance of infrastructure, street trees, sidewalks, and parks. Consistent. The proposed project would include installation and maintenance of collector streets and a public park, similar to the previously approved development on the project site. The proposed project would also participate, as required, in the Communities Facilities District established for this area. As demonstrated in Table 3.10-1, the proposed project would be consistent with the goals, policies, and planning principles applicable to the Platinum Triangle and found in Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 136 May 2016 the City of Anaheim General Plan and the PTMLUP. The proposed project would help the City achieve the larger planning vision for the Platinum Triangle by developing an underused property at a prominent location in the center of the Platinum Triangle and adjacent to Angel Stadium of Anaheim. Additionally, the proposed project would help the City meet several of the project objectives identified in SEIR No. 339 (see Section 1.4 herein for a complete list of project objectives identified in the SEIR), including providing for a wide range of housing opportunities in proximity to jobs and a regional transportation center, facilitating continued development of the Platinum Triangle, and accommodating future market demand through amendments to the General Plan and PTMLUP. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the land uses, activities, and development density/intensity that was analyzed in the SEIR for the project site. Additionally, because of its location on the south side of Gene Autry Way, the proposed project would not interfere with the existing Southern California Gas Company microwave tower, and, as such, the significant and unavoidable impacts identified in SEIR No. 339 related to the microwave tower would not apply to the proposed project, and the project would have no impact in this regard. Therefore, based on the above, no impacts associated with applicable land use plans, policies, and regulations would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with applicable habitat conservation plans and natural community conservation plans would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project site is not located within a designated Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Communities Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or state habitat conservation plan area. Implementation of the proposed project would not conflict with local, regional, or state resource preservation and/or conservation policies. Therefore, no impacts associated with conservation plan provisions or polices would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in SEIR No. 339. Therefore, no Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 137 May 2016 impacts associated with an adopted or approved conservation plan would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.10.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to land use and planning. 3.11 Mineral Resources a) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with loss of availability of a known mineral resources would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. According to SEIR No. 339, the project area does not contain any mineral resources. The project area is not identified in the City of Anaheim General Plan Green Element as containing regionally significant aggregate resources or being within a Mineral Resource Zone, as designated by the state (City of Anaheim 2015). As such, implementation of the proposed project would not result in the loss of the availability of any mineral resources. Therefore, no impacts associated with mineral resources would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project result in the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan, or other land use plan? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with the loss of availability of a locally important mineral resource recovery site would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.11(a), above. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 138 May 2016 3.11.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to mineral resources. 3.12 Noise The following analysis is based, in part, on the March 2016 noise modeling conducted by Dudek and included as Appendix H of this document. a) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to result in exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that (1) noise-sensitive residential units proposed in the Platinum Triangle may be exposed to mobile- and stationary-source noise levels that exceed state and/or City standards; and (2) building façades that are exposed to noise levels that exceed 69 A- weighted decibels (dBA) would require architectural improvements to achieve the required 45 dBA community noise equivalent level (CNEL) interior noise level limits. Even with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 5-2 through 5-4, impacts related to exposure to mobile- and stationary-source noise levels that exceed state and/or City standards were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Short-Term Construction Impacts Construction noise and vibration are temporary phenomena. Construction noise and vibration levels vary from hour-to-hour and day-to-day, depending on the equipment in use, the operations being performed, and the distance between the source and receptor. It is anticipated that construction of the proposed project would involve overlapping construction phases, commencing in December 2016 and ending in September 2020. Equipment that would be in operation during construction would include excavators, backhoes, scrapers, forklifts, compressors, paving equipment, and haul trucks. The Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 139 May 2016 typical maximum noise levels for various pieces of construction equipment at a distance of 50 feet are presented in Table 3.12-1, Construction Equipment Maximum Noise Levels. Note that the equipment noise levels presented in Table 3.12-1 are maximum noise levels. Typically, construction equipment operates in alternating cycles of full power and low power, producing average noise levels less than the maximum noise level. The average sound level of construction activity also depends on the amount of time that the equipment operates and the intensity of the construction activities during that time. Table 3.12-1 Construction Equipment Maximum Noise Levels Equipment Type “Typical” Equipment dBA at 50 feet “Quiet” Equipment* dBA at 50 feet Air compressor 81 71 Backhoe 85 80 Concrete pump 82 80 Concrete vibrator 76 70 Crane 83 75 Truck 88 80 Dozer 87 83 Generator 78 71 Loader 84 80 Paver 88 80 Pneumatic tools 85 75 Water pump 76 71 Power hand saw 78 70 Shovel 82 80 Trucks 88 83 Source: FTA 2006 * Estimated levels obtainable by selecting quieter procedures or machines and implementing noise-control features requiring no major redesign or extreme cost. The maximum noise levels at 50 feet for typical equipment would range up to 88 decibels (dB) for the type of equipment normally used for this type of development project, although the hourly noise levels would vary. Construction noise in a well-defined area typically attenuates at approximately 6 dB per doubling of distance. Project construction would take place both near and far from adjacent, existing noise-sensitive uses. For example, construction of the project along the southern project boundary would take place within approximately 60 feet of existing residences located to the south, but during construction of other project components, construction would be more than 600 feet away, and likely shielded from direct view by intervening structures. Typically (because Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 140 May 2016 of the size of the project site), construction noise would occur at distances of between 100 and 300 feet from existing noise-sensitive uses. The Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM) (FHWA 2008) was used to estimate construction noise levels at the nearest occupied noise-sensitive land use. Although the model was funded and promulgated by the FHWA, the RCNM is often used for non-roadway projects, because the same types of construction equipment used for roadway projects are also used for other project types. Input variables for the RCNM consist of the receiver/land use types, the equipment type and number of each (e.g., two graders, a loader, a tractor), the duty cycle for each piece of equipment (e.g., percentage of hours the equipment typically works per day), and the distance from the noise-sensitive receiver. No topographical or structural shielding was assumed in the modeling. The RCNM has default duty-cycle values for the various pieces of equipment, which were derived from an extensive study of typical construction activity patterns. Those default duty-cycle values were used for this noise analysis. Using the FHWA’s RCNM construction noise model and construction information (types and number of construction equipment by phase), the estimated noise levels from construction were calculated for a representative range of distances, as presented in Table 3.12-2, Construction Noise Model Results Summary. The RCNM inputs and outputs are provided in Appendix H. Table 3.12-2 Construction Noise Model Results Summary Construction Phase Construction Noise at Representative Receiver Distances (Leq (dBA)) 60 Feet 200 Feet Demolition 84 74 Excavation 81 72 Trenching 79 70 Construction Buildings 1 and 2 80 72 Construction Building 3 80 72 Paving 83 73 Architectural Coating Buildings 1 and 2 72 62 Architectural Coating Building 3 72 62 Leq = equivalent continuous sound level As presented in Table 3.12-2, the highest noise levels are predicted to occur during demolition, when noise levels from construction activities would be approximately 84 dBA Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 141 May 2016 equivalent continuous sound level (Leq) at the nearest existing residences, approximately 60 feet away. With incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures MM 5-7 through MM 5-10, short-term construction impacts associated with construction noise would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Long-Term Operational Impacts On-Site Operational Noise Potential operational noise sources associated with the propose project include heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) equipment; commercial truck deliveries; and any sizable surface parking lots (exterior parking areas not enclosed in a garage or parking structure). Long-term operational noise also includes project-generated traffic along nearby arterial roadways. HVAC Noise Mechanical HVAC equipment located on the ground or on rooftops of new buildings have the potential to generate high noise levels. The specific details (locations, sizes, manufacturers, and models) of the equipment have not yet been determined. Noise levels generated by HVAC equipment vary, but typically range from approximately 50 dBA to 65 dBA at a distance of 50 feet (City of Santa Ana 2010). For a single point source such as a piece of mechanical equipment, the sound level normally decreases by approximately 6 dBA for each doubling of distance from the source under “hard-surface” conditions typical of a developed commercial site. HVAC noise levels have the potential to exceed the City’s noise standard for stationary-source noise at residential uses (60 dBA Leq)2 if located within approximately 90 feet of the exteriors of the nearest existing noise- sensitive receptors to the project site (assuming a clear line-of-sight between source and receiver). Additionally, HVAC noise has the potential to exceed the City’s noise standard at the proposed future on-site residential uses. Implementation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure MM 5-2 would reduce noise impacts from HVAC equipment to less than significant. 2 City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 6.70, Sound Pressure Levels. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 142 May 2016 Truck Deliveries, Proposed Parking Structure and Surface Parking Noise In addition to HVAC systems, commercial and mixed-use projects have the potential to generate noise from truck deliveries and other mechanical equipment. Noise levels associated with commercial uses generally range from 65 dBA to 69 dBA at a distance of 50 feet from the noise source (PBS&J 2009). Under the City’s Municipal Code, commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone are required to be designed and operated, and hours of operation limited, such that neighboring residents are not exposed to offensive noise, especially from traffic, trash collection, routine deliveries, or late night activity. In addition, continual loading or unloading of heavy trucks at commercial sites within the PTMU Overlay Zone is prohibited between 8 p.m. and 6 a.m. (City of Anaheim 2016). Further, all commercial trucks are prohibited from idling longer than 5 minutes under CARB’s In-Use Idling Airborne Toxics Control Measure Rule 2485. Noise sources from parking lots include car alarms, door slams, radios, and tire squeals. These sources typically produce noise levels ranging from 55 to 70 dBA at 50 feet (Mestre Greve Associates 2011), and are generally very brief (several seconds or less) and intermittent. Parking lots have the potential to generate noise levels that exceed 65 dBA depending on the location of the source. However, noise sources from the parking lot would be different from each other in kind, duration, and location, so that the overall effects would be separate and, in most cases, would not affect noise-sensitive receptors at the same time. Similarly, traffic associated with the proposed parking structures would not be of sufficient volume to exceed community noise standards based on a time-averaged scale such as CNEL or Leq (Mestre Greve Associates 2011). However, the instantaneous maximum sound levels generated by a car door slamming, an engine starting up, or cars passing by could be annoying to adjacent proposed on-site residences. In accordance with SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure MM 5-2, a subsequent acoustical analysis would be required prior to approval of final occupancy permits, ensuring that noise levels from on-site and off-site noise-generating activities are in compliance with the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan noise standards at on-site noise-sensitive receptors (i.e., the proposed multi-family residential uses) and with the Municipal Code for existing off- site noise-sensitive receptors. Based on final site and floor plans, this acoustical analysis would make recommendations related to specific design features such as upgraded windows, thicker drywall, or denser insulation, all of which are shown to attenuate noise. This subsequent acoustical analysis would ultimately determine which particular design features are needed to comply with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 143 May 2016 Therefore, with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure MM 5-2, long-term operational impacts associated with on-site operational noise would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Off-Site Traffic Noise Project-Related Traffic Noise at Off-Site Receptors The proposed project would generate traffic along adjacent roadways, including State College Boulevard, Gene Autry Way, and Katella Avenue. Potential noise effects from vehicular traffic were assessed using FHWA’s Traffic Noise Model, version 2.5. Consistent with the Traffic Impact Study (Appendix H), information used in the model included the Existing (2015) (i.e., baseline conditions), Existing Plus Project (2015), Cumulative Year (2018), and Cumulative Year Plus Project (2018) traffic volumes and speeds. Traffic volumes for I-5 were obtained from Caltrans. Noise levels were modeled at representative on-site and off-site noise-sensitive receivers. The receivers (M1 through M37) were modeled at 5 feet above the local ground elevation, with the exception of existing and future multi-family, multi-floor residential receivers (e.g., M2, M3, M7, M8), which were modeled at third- and fifth-floor elevations, and receiver M36, which was modeled at the rooftop deck level. The receiver locations are shown in Figure 3.12-1. The information provided from this modeling was compared to the noise impact significance criteria used in SEIR No. 339 (i.e., a 5 dBA increase in an ambient noise environment of less than 65 dBA CNEL or a 3 dBA noise increase in an ambient noise environment of 65 dBA CNEL or more) to assess whether project traffic noise would cause a significant impact and, if so, where. The results of the comparisons are presented in Table 3.12-3. Table 3.12-3 Project-Related Traffic Noise (dBA CNEL) Modeled Receptor Receiver Description / Roadway Segment Existing (Year 2015) Existing (Year 2015) with Project Year 2018 Year 2018 with Project Maximum Noise Level Increase (dBA) M1 Existing residence south of project, 1st floor / South State College Blvd. 68 68 69 69 0 M2 Existing residence south of project, 3rd floor / South State College Blvd. 68 68 69 69 0 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 144 May 2016 Table 3.12-3 Project-Related Traffic Noise (dBA CNEL) Modeled Receptor Receiver Description / Roadway Segment Existing (Year 2015) Existing (Year 2015) with Project Year 2018 Year 2018 with Project Maximum Noise Level Increase (dBA) M3 Existing residence south of project, 5th floor / South State College Blvd. 67 68 68 69 1 M4 Commercial use west of project / East Gene Autry Way 55 56 57 58 1 M5 Commercial use north of project / South State College Blvd. 66 67 67 68 1 M6 Existing residence north of project, 1st floor / S. State College Blvd. 70 70 71 72 1 M7 Existing residence north of project, 3rd floor / S. State College Blvd. 69 70 71 71 0 M8 Existing residence north of project, 5th floor / S. State College Blvd. 69 69 70 71 1 M9 Existing residence north of project, 1st floor / E. Katella Avenue 69 69 70 70 0 M10 Existing residence north of project, 3rd floor / E. Katella Avenue 69 69 70 70 0 M11 Existing residence north of project, 5th floor / E. Katella Avenue 69 69 70 70 0 M12 Proposed Building A, 1st floor south side / I-5 N/A 54 N/A 54 N/A M13 Proposed Building A, 3rd floor south side / I-5 N/A 61 N/A 61 N/A M14 Proposed Building A, 5th floor south side / I-5 N/A 64 N/A 64 N/A M15 Proposed Building A, 1st floor NW side / E. Gene Autry Way N/A 61 N/A 63 N/A M16 Proposed Building A, 3rd floor NW side / E. Gene Autry Way N/A 62 N/A 64 N/A M17 Proposed Building A, 5th floor NW side / E. Gene Autry Way N/A 63 N/A 64 N/A Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 145 May 2016 Table 3.12-3 Project-Related Traffic Noise (dBA CNEL) Modeled Receptor Receiver Description / Roadway Segment Existing (Year 2015) Existing (Year 2015) with Project Year 2018 Year 2018 with Project Maximum Noise Level Increase (dBA) M18 Proposed Building B, 1st floor north side / E. Gene Autry Way N/A 61 N/A 63 N/A M19 Proposed Building B, 3rd floor north side / E. Gene Autry Way N/A 61 N/A 63 N/A M20 Proposed Building B, 5th floor north side / E. Gene Autry Way N/A 62 N/A 63 N/A M21 Proposed Building B, 1st floor south side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 45 N/A 45 N/A M22 Proposed Building B, 3rd floor south side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 49 N/A 49 N/A M23 Proposed Building B, 5th floor south side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 52 N/A 52 N/A M24 Proposed Building C, 1st floor south side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 57 N/A 58 N/A M25 Proposed Building C, 3rd floor south side / South State College Blvd. N/A 57 N/A 58 N/A M26 Proposed Building C, 5th floor south side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 57 N/A 58 N/A M27 Proposed Building C, 1st floor SE side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 67 N/A 69 N/A M28 Proposed Building C, 3rd floor SE side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 68 N/A 69 N/A M29 Proposed Building C, 5th floor SE side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 67 N/A 69 N/A M30 Proposed Building C, 1st floor NE side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 67 N/A 68 N/A M31 Proposed Building C, 3rd floor NE side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 68 N/A 69 N/A Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 146 May 2016 Table 3.12-3 Project-Related Traffic Noise (dBA CNEL) Modeled Receptor Receiver Description / Roadway Segment Existing (Year 2015) Existing (Year 2015) with Project Year 2018 Year 2018 with Project Maximum Noise Level Increase (dBA) M32 Proposed Building C, 5th floor NE side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 67 N/A 68 N/A M33 Proposed Building C, 1st floor north side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 63 N/A 65 N/A M34 Proposed Building C, 3rd floor north side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 64 N/A 65 N/A M35 Proposed Building C, 5th floor north side / S. State College Blvd. N/A 64 N/A 65 N/A M36 Proposed Rooftop Deck / I-5, Gene Autry Way N/A 65 N/A 65 N/A M37 Proposed Public Park / South State College Blvd. N/A 50 N/A 50 N/A Source: FHWA 2004; Appendix F N/A = not applicable; receiver would not exist without the proposed project; NW = northwest; NE = northeast; SE= southeast Traffic noise levels are rounded to the nearest whole numbers. As shown in Table 3.12-3, the proposed project would increase the noise level by 1 dBA or less (rounded to whole numbers) along the study area roadways. In the context of community noise, a 1 dBA increase is not noticeable to the human ear. Thus, due to the anticipated amount of increase in noise level (1 dBA) with implementation of the proposed project, noise impacts due to project traffic would be less than significant. The proposed project would not result in significant noise increases or cause an exceedance of applicable noise standards at any of the off-site noise-sensitive receptors. Modeled Traffic Noise Receivers Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: Bing Maps (Accessed 2016) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 3 - 1 2 - 1 _ N o i s e M a p . m x d 0300150Feet Project Boundary Traffic Noise Receiver FIGURE 3.12-1 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 148 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 149 May 2016 Off-Site Traffic Noise at Project Site (Proposed Future Residences, Rooftop Deck, and Public Park) At receptors M12 through M37, on-site Cumulative Plus Project (2018) traffic noise levels are predicted to range from 45 dBA CNEL at M21 (proposed residential uses at the first-floor level of the Phase II building) to 69 dBA CNEL at receptors M27 through M29 and M31 (proposed residential land uses at upper and lower floors adjacent to State College Boulevard in the Phase III building). The noise level at the proposed rooftop deck (M36) is predicted to be 65 dBA CNEL, which would equal but not exceed the 65 dBA CNEL exterior use standard, and, thus, would be less than significant. The proposed public park area (M37) would have a traffic noise level of approximately 50 dBA CNEL, and, thus, the noise impact at this location would also be less than significant. The City of Anaheim General Plan Noise Element indicates that noise thresholds are to be attained in habitable exterior areas and need not encompass the entirety of a property, and that special consideration should be given in the case of infill residential development along the City’s arterial corridors or railroad lines to achieve an appropriate balance between providing a quality living environment and attractive project design. Residential, office, institutional, and commercial land uses should be considered in light of achieving this type of balance (City of Anaheim 2015). The City does not consider balconies less than 6 feet in depth to be habitable exterior use areas, and, thus, the 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard would not apply in such exterior areas. In accordance with SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure MM 5-2, a subsequent acoustical analysis would be required prior to approval of final occupancy permits, ensuring that noise levels from on-site and off-site noise-generating activities are in compliance with the City’s Municipal Code and General Plan noise standards at on-site noise-sensitive receptors (i.e., the proposed multi-family residential uses). Based on final site and floor plans, this acoustical analysis would make recommendations related to specific design features such as upgraded windows, thicker drywall, or denser insulation, all of which are shown to attenuate noise. This subsequent acoustical analysis would determine which design features are needed to comply with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard. Therefore, with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure MM 5-2, long-term operational impacts associated with off-site traffic noise would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from those levels identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 150 May 2016 Other Off-Site Noise Sources Angel Stadium of Anaheim Placement of noise‐sensitive land uses within the vicinity of Angel Stadium of Anaheim would also expose residents to temporary increases in the ambient noise environment during a stadium event. During a game day, cheering, the public address system, and fireworks (when the Angels have a home run) would be audible at residential areas surrounding the stadium. These events typically occur in the evening, but could last past 10 p.m., which is considered the noise‐sensitive portion of the night. The average baseball game lasts 2 hours and 47 minutes, and each team plays 81 home games per year. Temporary increases in the ambient noise environment during the baseball season, which lasts from April through October (if the Angels play post‐season games), could result in nighttime awakenings for future residents. Typical noise levels within the stadium during a sporting event range from 94 dBA to 114 dBA for spectators within the stadium, and fireworks have a 150 dBA as measured at a distance of 10 feet. Because some populations are more sensitive to noise events, the threshold for awakening typically used for airport analysis assumes impacts if 10% of the population is awakened. Based on the Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise’s (FICAN) Effects of Aviation Noise on Awakenings from Sleep study (FICAN 1997), the interior noise level at which 10% of the population is awakened by a loud event is when interior noise levels exceed 81 dBA Single Event Level (SEL). For interior noise levels to exceed 81 dBA SEL, the exterior noise level would have to exceed 105 dBA SEL (based on standard construction). Without acoustically upgraded windows and doors, noise from sporting events at the stadium could result in a significant number of nighttime awakenings for projects located within the vicinity of the stadium. SEIR No. 339 concluded that any siting of sensitive land uses within the vicinity of the stadium that would be exposed to interior noise levels of 81 dBA SEL due to the stadium would result in a potentially significant noise impact. In accordance with SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure MM 5-2, a subsequent acoustical analysis would be required prior to approval of final occupancy permits, demonstrating (among other issues) that the proposed project residential design would minimize nighttime awakening from stadium event noise such that interior single-event noise levels are less than 81 dBA Lmax. Therefore, with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures MM 5-2 and MM 5- 3, long-term operational impacts associated with other off-site noise sources would be Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 151 May 2016 less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to result in exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that (1) construction activities would generate substantial levels of groundborne vibration and groundborne noise in the vicinity of vibration-sensitive land uses; and (2) vibration-sensitive receptors could be exposed to substantial levels of groundborne vibration and groundborne noise in the vicinity of the Amtrak/Metrolink line. Even with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 5-5 and 5-6, impacts related to generation of substantial levels of groundborne vibration and groundborne noise in the vicinity of vibration-sensitive land uses were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Short-Term Construction Impacts Groundborne vibration is a small, rapidly fluctuating motion transmitted through the ground that diminishes (attenuates) fairly rapidly over distance. Anticipated groundborne vibration from heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed project was evaluated and compared to relevant vibration impact criteria using the Federal Transit Administration’s Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, which provides vibration impact criteria and recommended methodologies and guidance for assessment of vibration effects (FTA 2006). At a distance of approximately 60 feet (the distance to the nearest noise/vibration-sensitive land uses), the vibration level from heavy construction machinery (such as a loaded truck or a drilling rig) would be between approximately 0.020 and 0.024 peak particle velocity in inches per second. Vibration levels of this magnitude would likely be perceptible at nearby residences, but they would be well below the Federal Transit Administration’s threshold of potential damage for normal structures (0.20 peak particle velocity in inches per second), and would not be considered excessive. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 152 May 2016 Therefore, short-term construction impacts associated with exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Long-Term Operational Impacts The proposed project would not create substantial levels of groundborne vibration during operation. Therefore, long-term operational impacts associated with exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that build-out of the Platinum Triangle would result in a substantial, permanent increase in ambient traffic noise levels within the vicinity of existing noise-sensitive receptors. Even with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measure 5-1, impacts were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.12(a), above. d) Would the project result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project. Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that development in the Platinum Triangle could result in a substantial temporary increase in noise levels in the vicinity of existing noise-sensitive land uses during construction activities. Even with incorporation Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 153 May 2016 of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 5-7 through 5-10, impacts were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.12(a). e) Would the project be located within an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with public airport noise would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. SEIR No. 339 found that the Platinum Triangle is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is the area within 2 miles of a public airport. Therefore, no impacts associated with public airport noise would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. f) Would the project be within the vicinity of a private airstrip, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with private airstrip/heliport/helipad noise to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. SEIR No. 339 identified several existing locations within the vicinity of the Platinum Triangle that support helicopter takeoffs/landings, including the North Net Fire Training Center (244 East Orangewood Avenue); UCI Medical Center (101 The City Drive South); and Angel Stadium (2000 East Gene Autry Way), which is used several times a week by the Anaheim Police Department for training purposes. Additionally, the SEIR found that new heliports/helipads could be constructed in the Platinum Triangle atop new high-rise structures for fire and emergency response use. Nonetheless, the SEIR Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 154 May 2016 concluded that although noise-sensitive uses could be potentially placed in proximity to heliports/helipads and areas of helicopter activity, use of these heliports and occurrence of helicopter activity would be infrequent. Therefore, impacts associated with private airstrip/heliport/helipad noise would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.12.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measures related to noise, which are applicable to the proposed project: MM 5-1 Prior to approval of street improvement plans for any project-related roadway widening, the City shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design project acoustical features that will limit traffic noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are below the City’s noise ordinance. These treatments shall be noted on the street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and may include, but are not limited to, the replacement of windows and doors at existing residences with acoustically rated windows and doors. MM 5-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project property owner/developers shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter, stationary sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, stadium, etc.), and railroad, to meet City interior and exterior noise standards as follows: a. The report shall demonstrate that the proposed residential design will result in compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise levels, as required by the California Building Code and California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24 and 25 of the California Code of Regulations). b. The report shall demonstrate that the Proposed Project residential design shall minimize nighttime awakening from stadium event noise and train horns such that interior single-event noise levels are below 81 dBA Lmax. The property owner/developer shall submit the noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for review and approval. Upon approval by the City, the project acoustical design features shall be incorporated into construction of the Proposed Project. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 155 May 2016 MM 5-5 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, to reduce noise and vibration impacts from the impact pile driver, the construction contractor shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct cast-in-place piles for a pile-supported transfer slab foundation system. This alternative construction method would reduce the duration necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or eliminate the need to use pile drivers altogether. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted to the Planning Department in the form of a letter from the construction contractor. MM 5-7 Ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise: a. Noise generated by construction, shall be limited by the property owner/developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code. b. Limit the hours of operation of equipment that produces noise levels noticeably above general construction noise levels to the hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM. c. All internal combustion engines on all of the construction equipment shall be properly outfitted with well-maintained muffler systems. MM 5-8 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring project contractors to properly maintain and tune all construction equipment to minimize noise emissions. MM 5-9 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring project contractors to locate all stationary noise sources (e.g., generators, compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible. MM 5-10 Ongoing during construction activities, material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 6.70. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 156 May 2016 3.13 Population and Housing a) Would the project induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with substantial population growth inducement to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project would directly induce population growth through allowing additional residential development, and indirectly induce population growth through allowing additional non-residential development in the Platinum Triangle. SEIR No. 339 found that build-out of the Platinum Triangle would result in an additional 8,643 dwelling units and 12,965 residents. The increase in office and commercial floor area was also estimated to add 26,860 employees to the project area. As a result of the increases in residential and employment floor area, the total population in the Platinum Triangle was forecast to be 28,364, and the total number of employees was projected to be 41,500. The project site is the location of a previously proposed mixed-use project, the Experience at Gene Autry. This project was originally approved by the Anaheim City Council in 2007 and involved development of 1,200 residential units and 150,000 square feet of office/retail space. Environmental impacts resulting from development of the previously approved project, including those associated with population growth inducement, were previously analyzed in EIR No. 335 and SEIR No. 339. The proposed project would develop a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units, and 9,800 square feet of retail space. According to SEIR No. 339, the persons-per-household ratio in the Platinum Triangle was estimated at 1.5 people for every dwelling unit (28,364 persons/18,909 dwelling units). Based on the proposed project’s 1,079 residential units, the project could potentially support upward of 1,618 people. The proposed mix of residential units and commercial/retail floor area still represents an appreciable reduction (net reduction of 121 residential units, 219,000 square feet of office space, and 108,200 square feet of commercial space) in the density/intensity that was analyzed in the SEIR for the project site. Thus, impacts related to population growth would be incrementally reduced compared to those evaluated in the SEIR. Therefore, impacts associated with substantial population growth inducement would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 157 May 2016 b) Would the project displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with displacing existing housing would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Under existing conditions, the project site does not contain any residential uses. Therefore, no impacts associated with displacement of housing would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that no impacts associated with displacing people would occur. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The project site does not contain any residential uses, and, as such, does not support a residential population. Therefore, no impacts associated with displacement of people would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.13.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 did not recommend any mitigation measures related to population and housing. 3.14 Public Services a) Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times, or other performance objectives for any of the public services: Fire protection? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with fire protection facilities to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 7-1 and 7-2. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 158 May 2016 Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The AFD provides fire protection, emergency rescue, and medical services to the Platinum Triangle. There are 11 fire stations located throughout the City, plus one station in the Disneyland Resort. No fire stations currently exist in the Platinum Triangle. The two closest fire stations are located approximately 0.5 mile from the project site. Stadium Station No. 7 is located at 2222 East Ball Road, and Resort Station No. 3 is located at 1717 South Clementine. The AFD has a plan to construct three new fire stations to serve the Platinum Triangle. The first station, the Battalion Headquarters Station, would be located along Santa Cruz Street north of Orangewood Avenue; the second station would be located in the north-central area of the Platinum Triangle; and the third station would be located at an undetermined location. The proposed project would develop a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units, and 9,800 square feet of retail space. The addition of these new residential units and commercial/retail floor area would incrementally increase the calls of service to the project site, potentially necessitating increases in personnel and equipment to maintain an adequate level of fire protection service. However, as discussed in Section 3.13(a), above, the proposed project’s residential and commercial/retail mix represents an appreciable reduction in the density/intensity that was analyzed for the project site in the SEIR. Thus, there would be an incremental decrease in the number of calls for emergency services provided by the AFD compared to that evaluated in the SEIR. Nonetheless, the proposed project would incorporate Mitigation Measures 7-1 and 7-2 from the SEIR to further reduce its impacts on fire protection services and facilities. Therefore, with incorporation of these mitigation measures from the SEIR, impacts associated with fire protection services and facilities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Police protection? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with police protection facilities to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 7-3 through 7-7. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 159 May 2016 Law enforcement and crime prevention services for the project site are provided by the Anaheim Police Department. The City is divided into four districts and one police heliport. the Platinum Triangle is located within the South Police District. The two nearest police facilities are Main Station, located 3.5 miles northwest of the Platinum Triangle at 425 South Harbor Boulevard, and South Station, located 3.6 miles west of the Platinum Triangle at 1520 Disneyland Drive. Similar to fire protection services, the proposed project’s new residential units and commercial/retail floor area would incrementally increase the calls of service to the project site, potentially necessitating the need for additional officers and support personnel, office space, vehicles, and equipment to maintain an adequate level of police protection service. However, the proposed project’s residential and commercial/retail mix represents an appreciable reduction in the density/intensity that was analyzed for the project site in the SEIR. Thus, there would be an incremental decrease in the number of calls for police services provided by the Anaheim Police Department compared to that evaluated in the SEIR. Notwithstanding, the proposed project would incorporate Mitigation Measures 7-3 through 7- 7 from the SEIR to further reduce its impacts on police protection services and facilities. Therefore, with incorporation of these mitigation measures from the SEIR, impacts associated with police protection services and facilities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Schools? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with schools to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 7- 8 and 7-9. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The Platinum Triangle is located within the enrollment boundaries of the Anaheim City School District and the Anaheim Union High School District, and within the attendance boundaries of Paul Revere Elementary School, South Junior High School, and Katella High School. According to SEIR No. 339, a demographic consultant for the Anaheim City School District conducted a survey of current student generation rates for residential projects in Southern California that are similar to the type of residential development that would occur in the Platinum Triangle, and found that residential development in the Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 160 May 2016 Platinum Triangle would generate fewer students than the number of students expected to be generated from the traditional housing type. Based on student generation rates used in SEIR No. 339, the proposed project’s 1,079 residential apartments would generate approximately 390 elementary students (0.3609 students per dwelling unit), 113 junior high students (0.1040 students per dwelling unit), and 194 high school students (0.1790 students per dwelling unit), for a total of 697 students. This generation of students would potentially necessitate the need for physical capital to respond to the increased student enrollment. Nonetheless, consistent with Senate Bill 50 and Mitigation Measure 7-9 from the SEIR, the project applicant would be required to pay its fair share of development impact fees to help offset any incremental project impacts to school facilities. Therefore, with incorporation of this mitigation measure from the SEIR, impacts associated with schools services and facilities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Parks? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with parks to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 8-1 through 8-3. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.15(a), below. Other public facilities? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with public facilities such as libraries to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measure 7-10. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The Anaheim Public Library system consists of a central library, five branch libraries, a joint use library, a reading room, a Book Lending Machine called “Books On The Go” at ARTIC, and one bookmobile. The nearest library facility to the Platinum Triangle is Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 161 May 2016 the Sunkist Branch Library located at 901 South Sunkist Avenue. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project area is also served by virtual Anaheim Library services through the network at the Central Library located at 500 West Broadway. The proposed project’s new residential units and commercial/retail floor area would incrementally increase the patronage at library facilities, potentially necessitating increases in additional physical and virtual resources to maintain the current level of community support. However, the proposed project’s residential and commercial/retail mix represents an appreciable reduction in the density/intensity that was analyzed for the project site in the SEIR. Thus, there would be an incremental decrease in library patronage compared to that evaluated in the SEIR. Additionally, the project applicant would be required to pay its fair share of Library Impact Fees to help offset any incremental project impacts to library facilities. This fee is anticipated to be reviewed annually, and adjustments are made based on the inflation/deflation costs for library construction, land, library materials, and computers. Therefore, impacts associated with public facilities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.14.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measures related to public services, which are applicable to the proposed project: MM 7-1 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed by the property owner/developer prior to each final Building and Zoning inspection. MM 7-2 Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for fire facilities and equipment impact fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36. MM 7-3 Prior to the approval of Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including implementation of Ordinance 6016 and the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (i.e., building design, circulation, site planning and lighting of parking structure and parking areas). Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking structures (for the police helicopter). Minimum size for numbers shall be four feet Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 162 May 2016 in height and two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to the parking structure and shall face the street to which the structure is addressed. MM 7-4 Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Anaheim Police Department. Said measures shall be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning inspections. MM 7-5 Prior to the approval of Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit design plans that shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Anaheim Police Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim Police Department. MM 7-6 Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim Police Department of Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. MM 7-7 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for police facilities and equipment impact fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36. MM 7-9 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the school impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Anaheim Union High School District and Anaheim City School District in compliance with Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section 65995 [b][3] as amended). 3.15 Recreation a) Would the project increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with increasing the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 8-1 through 8-3. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 163 May 2016 Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. According to SEIR No. 339, to serve the demand for parks within the Platinum Triangle, residential developers are required to pay park‐in‐lieu fees to provide the funding necessary for the development of future parks as residential uses are introduced into the project area. Development on parcels 8 acres or larger with more than 325 residential units are required to provide and construct an on‐site privately maintained public park, ensuring that small parks are distributed throughout the residentially developed portions of the Platinum Triangle. These mini‐parks must be a minimum of 44 square feet per each dwelling unit within the proposed development. This park requirement is in addition to the payment of park‐in‐lieu fees; however, the value of the parkland dedication is credited against the overall park‐in‐lieu fees paid for the proposed development. This credit is given for parkland dedication only, and does not include improvements to the park. In addition, every development is required to provide 200 square feet of recreational‐leisure area for each dwelling unit within private and/or common areas. Consistent with these requirements, the proposed project would include an approximately 1.11-acre public park within the southern portion of the project site. The park was designed for passive use by both the proposed project’s residents and the surrounding community. The 1.11 acres of public park complies with the mini-park requirement to provide 44 square feet of parkland for each dwelling unit. In addition to this public park, the proposed project would offer various private recreational amenities such as swimming pools and outdoor dining areas, which would encourage residents to recreate on site while simultaneously reducing the use of similar off-site facilities in the City. Further, consistent with the state Quimby Act and City requirements, the project applicant would be required to pay its fair share of park‐in‐lieu fees to help offset any incremental and indirect project impacts to local and regional park and recreational facilities. Therefore, no impacts associated with parks and recreational facilities would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Does the project include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities, which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with environmental effects resulting from new or expanded recreational facilities to be less than significant. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 164 May 2016 Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.15(a), above. 3.15.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measure related to park and recreation facilities, which is applicable to the proposed project: MM 8-2 Ongoing during project implementation, the City shall continue to work with developers to seek alternative means of providing recreational amenities. 3.16 Transportation and Traffic The following analysis is based, in part, on the February 2016 Traffic Impact Study (TIS) prepared by KHR Associates and included as Appendix I of this document. Under the City’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies guidance document, a TIS is required whenever a project is anticipated to generate 100 or more peak-hour trips. Although a previous TIS report was produced in March 2007 for the previously proposed Gene Autry Experience project, the City determined that a new TIS would be required. As part of the TIS, new traffic counts were taken at 15 study intersections and five roadway segments. Two additional roadway segments were subsequently added to gain greater perspective on area-wide traffic and circulation. The City provided an updated list of approved projects within the Platinum Triangle for inclusion in the cumulative analysis portion of the TIS. The TIS focused on the following: 1. Establishing a baseline for traffic conditions at potentially impacted intersections and roadways 2. Determining how much traffic could be generated by the proposed project 3. Determining if the additional traffic would result in impacts at any or all of the study intersections and roadways under various future development scenarios within the Platinum Triangle 4. Determining appropriate mitigation measures should it be found that any or all of the study intersections and roadways are impacted 5. Evaluating other traffic-related issues such as parking, transit use, and internal traffic controls. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 165 May 2016 Although the proposed project would be constructed in phases, for the purposes of evaluating the project’s “worst-case” individual and cumulative impacts on the local and regional circulation network, the TIS conservatively assumed an opening year of 2018. TIS Methodology Study Intersections and Roadway Segments Study intersections and arterial roadway segments were identified by the City and are shown in Table 3.16-1, along with a notation of which intersections are Caltrans-controlled, either jointly with the City or autonomously. Table 3.16-1 Study Area Roadways and Intersections ID Roadway Segments A State College Boulevard between Katella Avenue and Cerritos Avenue B State College Boulevard between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue C State College Boulevard between Orangewood Avenue and I-5 D Katella Avenue between State College Boulevard and SR-57 E Katella Avenue between State College Boulevard and I-5 F Gene Autry Way between State College Boulevard and I-5 (Voluntary) G Orangewood Avenue between State College Boulevard and I-5 (Voluntary) No. Intersection Caltrans Control 1 Katella Avenue & I-5 SB Ramps/Manchester Avenue X 2 Katella Avenue & I-5 NB Ramps/Anaheim Way X 3 Katella Avenue & Lewis Street 4 Katella Avenue & State College Boulevard 5 Katella Avenue & Stadium Crossing 6 Katella Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps X 7 Katella Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps X 8 State College Boulevard & Gateway 9 State College Boulevard & Gene Autry Way 10 State College Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue 11 Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps X 12 Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps X 13 The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 NB Ramps X 14 The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramps X 15 Gene Autry Way & I-5 HOV Ramps X SB = southbound; NB = northbound; HOV = high-occupancy-vehicle Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 166 May 2016 Trip Generation Trip generation for the proposed project was estimated by applying known trip generation rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers’ Trip Generation manual, 9th Edition, for the various proposed uses. For urban settings such as the Platinum Triangle, trip generation is calculated for an average weekday (24-hour period and for the morning and afternoon peak hours of weekday commute (typically 7 to 9 a.m. and 4 to 6 p.m.)) on streets serving a given project. Trip Reduction In some instances, trip-making interactions between uses within a given project site allow for an overall reduction in the estimate of trip generation for the site. Although residential, retail, office, and public transit uses within the project vicinity suggest that some internal trips could occur, there is insufficient empirical data to support a significant trip reduction based solely on the mixed-use nature of the immediate project area. Therefore, for traffic analysis purposes, a conservative approach was taken, and no reduction was taken for internal trip capture. Trip Distribution Based on known trip-making propensities and travel routes taken by those living and working within the Platinum Triangle, trip distribution assumptions are shown in Figure 3.16-1 for inbound and outbound trips generated by the proposed project. Trip Assignments Trip assignments were made based on the trip distribution assumptions illustrated in Figure 3.16- 1. These trip assignments were based on physical and operational constraints affecting roadways and intersections, direction (i.e., inbound or outbound) and time of day (i.e., AM or PM peak hour) of travel, and traffic control devices that regulate the flow of traffic on the streets and highways servicing the project site. Inbound and outbound trips generated by the proposed project during the daily and AM and PM peak hours of weekday commute were assigned to various roadway segments and study intersections based on trip distribution percentages in each direction from the project site. These inbound and outbound trip assignments during daily and AM and PM peak hours are depicted in Figure 3.16-2. Trip Distribution Assumptions Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: KHR Associates (2016) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 3 - 1 6 - 1 _ T r a f f i c S t u d y . m x d FIGURE 3.16-1 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 168 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK FIGURE 3.16-2 Daily and Peak-Hour Project-Only Trip Assignments Jefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: KHR Associates (2016) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 3 - 1 6 - 2 _ T r a f f i c S t u d y . m x d Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 170 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 171 May 2016 Level of Service The level of service (LOS) of a roadway segment or an intersection is a qualitatively defined measure of prevailing traffic, design, and operational conditions. The LOS, denoted alphabetically from A to F, best to worst, is an evaluation of the degree of congestion, roadway design constraints, delay, accident potential, and driver discomfort experienced during a given period of time, typically during peak hours or on a daily basis. LOS A is the most desirable operational state for a roadway segment or intersection, but LOS C is considered a benchmark for arterial streets segments, and LOS D is an accepted condition for intersections, per the City Traffic and Transportation Division’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies (City of Anaheim n.d.). LOS may be quantitatively calculated by a number of methods that generally compare traffic volumes with the physical and operational capacity of a roadway section or intersection to carry traffic demands. For roadway segments and intersections, the volume-to-capacity ratio is indicative of LOS. Traffic volumes are measured by conducting actual counts over prescribed periods of time. Capacity is established by the governing jurisdiction, and often based on localized conditions. Intersection LOS can also be determined using computer software to account for various influencing factors such as lane configurations, traffic signal timing (for signalized intersections), and vehicle delays. Table II of the TIS (Appendix I) lists the typical service volumes corresponding to the number of lanes and median type. The LOS for roadway segments are generally used for planning purposes only, and do not indicate true operational LOS during peak hours. Various methods of computing intersection LOS are used, including the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) and HCS+ software, based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM). Table III of the TIS (Appendix I) provides the City’s LOS definitions for signalized intersections at corresponding volume-to-capacity ratios. Table IV of the TIS (Appendix I) provides criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections, based on HCM and Caltrans methodologies for determining LOS. LOS is used to approximate true operating conditions, and is normally calculated for intersections during morning and late afternoon peak hours. Based on the Caltrans traffic impact study guidelines (Caltrans 2002), Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS C and LOS D on state highway facilities. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 172 May 2016 a) Would the project conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system. Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that build-out of the Platinum Triangle would impact levels of service for the area roadway system. Even with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 9-1 through 9-15, impacts related to levels of service for the area roadway system were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Existing Traffic Conditions Existing Traffic – Year 2015 Conditions Existing traffic at study roadway segments and intersections were documented by directional 24-hour (i.e., average daily traffic) and peak hour (i.e., AM and P.M peak hours of weekday commute) turn movement counts. The results are shown in Figure 3.16-3. Existing + Project Traffic – Year 2015 Conditions Results of adding project traffic (i.e., trip assignments) to existing traffic at study roadway segments and intersections during the AM and PM peak hours of weekday commute is shown in Figure 3.16-4. FIGURE 3.16-3 Existing Roadway ADT & Peak-Hour Intersection Traffic Counts Year 2015 ConditionsJefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: KHR Associates (2016) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 3 - 1 6 - 3 _ T r a f f i c S t u d y . m x d Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 174 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Existing + Project Roadway ADT & Peak-Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes Year 2015 ConditionsJefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: KHR Associates (2016) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 3 - 1 6 - 4 _ T r a f f i c S t u d y . m x d FIGURE 3.16-4 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 176 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 177 May 2016 Future Traffic Conditions Cumulative Traffic Generation A number of development projects within the Platinum Triangle are either in the design or advanced planning stages or are under construction; these will generate varying amounts of traffic on the regional streets and highways network. Traffic generated by these development projects need to be taken into account when evaluating the proposed project’s fair share responsibilities for traffic improvements. Although the timing of completion of each development will vary, a conservative scenario was used by assuming build-out and occupancy of each development by 2018 (the modeled Opening Year of the proposed project). Table 3.16-2 contains a list of committed and proposed projects within the Platinum Triangle, as provided by the City, along with their respective amounts of traffic estimated to be generated upon completion. The location of each of these projects is identified in Figure 26 of the TIS (Appendix I). Table 3.16-2 Committed and Proposed Development Projects Land Use Size Unit ADT2 AM Peak Hour2 PM Peak Hour2 In Out Total In Out Total 1. Wolff Company “Platinum Gateway” (915 E. Katella Avenue) – Apartments Trip Generation1 399 DU 2,681 64 156 219 163 104 267 2. Wolff Company “Platinum Vista” (1105 E. Katella Avenue) – Apartments Trip Generation1 386 DU 2,594 62 151 212 158 101 259 3. Urban Partners “Anaheim Apartment Communities” (1725 S. Auburn Way) – Apartments Trip Generation1 244 DU 1,640 39 95 134 100 64 163 4. TDI “Jefferson Platinum Triangle I & II” (1781 S. Campton Avenue and 1551 E. Wright Circle) – Apartments Trip Generation1 400 DU 2,688 64 156 220 163 105 268 5. Lennar “A-Town Metro” (1404 E. Katella Avenue) – Residential/Commercial Trip Generation1 1,746/50.000 DU/KSF 13,949 443 860 1,302 854 567 1,421 6. LNR “Platinum Stadium” (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue) – Apartments Trip Generation1 525 DU 3,528 84 205 289 215 137 351 7. Lyon-Integral Anaheim “Orangewood Apartments” (2211 E. Orangewood Avenue) – Apartments Trip Generation1 341 DU 2,292 54 133 188 139 89 228 8. The Irvine Company “Gateway Apartment Homes Phase II” (2020 & 2100 Orangewood Avenue) – Apartments Trip Generation1 395 DU 2,654 63 154 217 161 103 265 Total Trip Generation 32,026 872 1,910 2,782 1,954 1,270 3,223 ADT = average daily traffic; DU = dwelling unit; KSF = thousand square feet Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 178 May 2016 1 Trip Generation Rate & Percentage of Inbound/Outbound Trips Per Trip Generation Manual, 9th Ed., Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2 All trip ends rounded to nearest whole unit. Existing+Ambient+Cumulative Traffic – Year 2018 Conditions Results of adding ambient growth of 1% per year (for 3 years), and cumulative development traffic to existing traffic at study roadway segments and intersections during the AM and PM peak hours of weekday commute are shown in Figure 3.16-5. Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+Project Traffic – Year 2018 Conditions Results of adding project traffic to the existing traffic, ambient growth, and cumulative development traffic at study roadway segments and intersections during the AM and PM peak hours of weekday commute are shown in Figure 3.16-6. Existing and Future LOS Future traffic conditions resulting from additional development are predicted by performing a travel demand forecast. Such forecasts vary in magnitude and complexity, but, at minimum, include defining the streets and highways network of interest, estimating the amount of traffic generated by a given development or geographic area, determining the area-wide distribution of this traffic, and assigning it to specific portions of the streets and highways network. To determine the magnitude and impact of additional traffic generated onto streets surrounding the project site, a travel demand forecast of future traffic conditions was undertaken for the proposed project. Using traffic counts taken in 2015 and employing trip generation, distribution, and assignment of future traffic, existing and future roadway and intersection LOS can be determined. Six of the 15 study intersections are under the jurisdiction of the City, and nine are under Caltrans control. The ICU methodology was employed to determine intersection LOS for all study intersections. Roadway segments were evaluated based on the LOS volumes described in the City of Anaheim General Plan Circulation Element. The nine Caltrans-maintained intersections were again analyzed per the 2010 HCM method. Existing + Ambient + Cumulative Roadway ADT & Peak-Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes Year 2018 ConditionsJefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: KHR Associates (2016) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 3 - 1 6 - 5 _ T r a f f i c S t u d y . m x d FIGURE 3.16-5 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 180 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project Roadway ADT & Peak-Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes Year 2018 ConditionsJefferson Stadium Park Project SOURCE: KHR Associates (2016) Dat e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 3 - 1 6 - 6 _ T r a f f i c S t u d y . m x d FIGURE 3.16-6 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 182 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 183 May 2016 Existing, Project, Ambient Growth, and Cumulative Roadway LOS Based on a comparison between the average daily traffic count in Appendix A of the TIS (Appendix I) and the General Plan Circulation Element designations for various roadway classifications (Table III of the TIS), the LOS for study roadways for the 2015 Existing and 2015 Existing Plus Project volumes were determined. Then, ambient traffic (1% per year for 3 years), cumulative project-related traffic, and project volumes were added to the estimate LOS under 2018 conditions. Cumulative impacts refer to the combined effects of traffic generated by individual projects within a defined area of concern. The City’s list of committed and proposed projects will generate varying amounts of additional traffic (Table 3.16-2). Although the traffic impacts associated with each of these projects may not be individually significant, cumulatively, the traffic impact can be significant, and has the potential to compound or increase the impacts from traffic from the proposed project. As noted in Table 3.16-3, all study roadway segments currently operate at an acceptable LOS, and should continue to operate at an acceptable LOS through the 2018 estimates. Table 3.16-3 Existing (2015); Existing + Project (2015); Existing + Ambient + Cumulative (2018); and Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (2018) Roadway Segment Volume-to-Capacity Ratio and Levels of Service Roadway Segment Existing (2015) Existing + Project (2015) + Cumulative (2018) Existing + Ambient (2018) Existing +Ambient + Cumulative + Project State College Blvd. Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Katella Ave. to Cerritos Ave. 26,736 A 27,142 A 28,749 A 29,155 A Katella Ave. to Orangewood 27,057 A 29,491 A 36,285 A 40,342 A Orangewood to I-5 23,445 A 24,662 A 30,873 A 32,090 A Katella Avenue Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS State College to SR-57 32,321 A 33,944 B 38,745 B 40,368 C State College to I-5 31,172 A 33,200 A 41,431 A 43,459 A Gene Autry Way Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS State College to I-5 4,210 A 5,833 A 7,838 A 9,461 A Orangewood Avenue Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS State College to I-5 23,232 A 23,721 A 25,697 A 26,186 A Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 184 May 2016 Existing & Existing + Project Intersection LOS Existing signalized intersection LOS, as calculated using the ICU method, is summarized in Table 3.16-4 for the 15 signalized intersections studied. Turn-movement counts for existing traffic were taken in September 2015. Project traffic was then added to the existing volumes to estimate project impacts on existing conditions. The ICU calculation forms are appended to the TIS (Appendix I). As shown in Table 3.16-4, all intersections operate within acceptable LOS B or better under both scenarios. Table 3.16-4 Existing & Existing + Project (2015) ICU-Based LOS Intersection Existing (2015)1 Existing + Project (2015)1 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS Katella Ave./I-5 SB Ramps 0.569 A 0.551 A 0.577 A 0.567 A Katella Ave./I-5 NB Ramps 0.371 A 0.551 A 0.375 A 0.578 A Katella Ave./Lewis Street 0.524 A 0.537 A 0.546 A 0.554 A Katella Ave./State College Blvd. 0.587 A 0.587 A 0.630 B 0.617 B Katella Ave./Stadium Crossing 0.316 A 0.442 A 0.336 A 0.452 A Katella Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.319 A 0.337 A 0.334 A 0.340 A Katella Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.358 A 0.420 A 0.365 A 0.424 A State College Blvd./Gateway 0.380 A 0.392 A 0.394 A 0.421 A State College Blvd./Gene Autry Way 0.457 A 0.407 A 0.577 A 0.526 A State College Blvd./Orangewood Ave. 0.600 A 0.565 A 0.617 B 0.588 A Orangewood Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.677 B 0.622 B 0.682 B 0.625 B Orangewood Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.575 A 0.437 A 0.578 A 0.447 A State College Blvd./I-5 NB Ramps 0.316 A 0.613 B 0.327 A 0.621 B State College Blvd./I-5 SB Ramps 0.376 A 0.339 A 0.380 A 0.341 A Gene Autry Way/I-5 HOV Ramps 0.120 A 0.118 A 0.158 A 0.194 A 1 Intersection Counts Taken by NDS, September 23, 2015 ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; SB = southbound; NB = northbound; HOV = high-occupancy-vehicle Existing + Ambient + Cumulative & Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project LOS Future 2018 intersection LOS is summarized in Table 3.16-5 for the 15 signalized study intersections. Additionally, two intersections that would directly serve the proposed project— Gene Autry Way/Union Street and State College Boulevard/Artisan Court—were added to the future LOS calculations using 2015 counts from surrounding roadways, and assigning ambient growth, cumulative development traffic, and project traffic. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 185 May 2016 Table 3.16-5 Existing + Ambient + Cumulative (2018) & Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (2018) ICU-Based LOS Intersection Existing + Ambient + Cumulative (2018)1, 2 Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (2018)1, 3 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS Katella Ave./I-5 SB Ramps 0.619 B 0.642 B 0.627 B 0.657 B Katella Ave./I-5 NB Ramps 0.438 A 0.685 B 0.450 A 0.694 B Katella Ave./Lewis Street 0.648 B 0.675 B 0.670 B 0.692 B Katella Ave./State College Blvd. 0.707 C 0.755 C 0.751 C 0.785 C Katella Ave./Stadium Crossing 0.416 A 0.544 A 0.436 A 0.554 A Katella Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.394 A 0.396 A 0.409 A 0.399 A Katella Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.420 A 0.510 A 0.427 A 0.515 A State College Blvd./Gateway 0.425 A 0.451 A 0.439 A 0.480 A State College Blvd./Gene Autry Way 0.532 A 0.496 A 0.652 B 0.616 B State College Blvd./Orangewood Ave. 0.706 C 0.623 B 0.724 C 0.645 B Orangewood Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.765 C 0.677 B 0.770 C 0.680 B Orangewood Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.605 B 0.514 A 0.608 B 0.518 A State College Blvd./I-5 NB Ramps 0.351 A 0.650 B 0.362 A 0.657 B State College Blvd./I-5 SB Ramps 0.403 A 0.356 A 0.406 A 0.358 A Gene Autry Way/I-5 HOV Ramps 0.137 A 0.146 A 0.164 A 0.156 A State College Blvd./Artisan Court 0.414 A 0.369 A 0.445 A 0.389 A Gene Autry Way/Union Street 0.167 A 0.113 A 0.260 A 0.307 A 1 Intersection counts taken by NDS, September 23, 2015 2 Inclusive of ambient growth at 1% per year ICU = Intersection Capacity Utilization; SB = southbound; NB = northbound; HOV = high-occupancy-vehicle As shown in Table 3.16-5, all study intersections are estimated to continue to operate at LOS C or better under both scenarios. With the project traffic added to future 2018 estimates of existing plus ambient growth plus cumulative development traffic, intersection delays increase slightly, but the LOS remains well within acceptable levels at all locations. Table 3.16-6 shows the results of the HCM method of determining LOS for the Caltrans maintained intersections. As indicated, all intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of LOS “C” or better. Between the existing 2015 conditions, and the existing + ambient + project + cumulative conditions in 2018, all of the intersections experience an increase in delays and in some cases, worsening, but still acceptable, LOS. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 186 May 2016 Table 3.16-6 Existing (2015) & Existing + Ambient + Project + Cumulative (2018) HCM-Based LOS Intersection Existing (2015)1 Existing + Ambient + Project + Cumulative (2018)2 AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Katella Ave./I-5 SB Ramps 20.0 B 14.3 B 22.0 C 17.0 B Katella Ave./I-5 NB Ramps 17.9 B 24.2 C 21.6 C 29.5 C Katella Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 16.9 B 18.1 B 21.7 C 21.3 C Katella Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 18.1 B 18.4 B 21.5 C 22.2 C Orangewood Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 30.2 C 23.2 C 34.4 C 25.3 C Orangewood Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 19.4 B 15.7 B 20.1 C 18.8 C State College Blvd./I-5 NB Ramps 20.7 C 19.8 B 23.8 C 21.2 C State College Blvd./I-5 SB Ramps 21.1 C 13.9 B 22.7 C 14.7 B 1 Intersection counts taken by NDS, September 23, 2015 2 Inclusive of ambient growth at 1% per year, plus project and cumulative development traffic 3 Worst-case direction average intersection delay per vehicle (in seconds) HCM = Highway Capacity Manual; SB = southbound; NB = northbound Based on the above findings and conclusions, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in significantly measurable traffic impacts to any of the study street segments or intersections during the daily or AM or PM peak hours of weekday commute. Therefore, impacts associated with an applicable plan, ordinance, or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. b) Would the project conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the project analyzed in the SEIR had the potential to conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including LOS standards, travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways, including those under Caltrans control that are identified in the congestion management program. Specifically, SEIR No. 339 found that build-out of the Platinum Triangle would increase traffic volumes on Caltrans facilities. Even with incorporation of SEIR No. 339 Mitigation Measures 9-1 through 9-15, impacts related to increased traffic volumes on Caltrans facilities were determined to remain significant and unavoidable, Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 187 May 2016 and a statement of overriding considerations was adopted by the City Council when the SEIR was certified. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.16(a), above. c) Would the project result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with air traffic pattern changes to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. SEIR No. 339 found that the Platinum Triangle is not located within an airport land use plan, nor is the area within 2 miles of a public airport. Therefore, no impacts associated with air traffic patterns would occur, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. d) Would the project substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses (e.g., farm equipment)? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with hazardous design features or incompatible land uses to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 9-16 and 9-17. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project would be responsible for various street and traffic improvements along the project frontage, including constructing the intersection of Gene Autry Way and Union Street for future traffic signalization, widening Gene Autry Way to ultimate standards, and widening State College Boulevard to ultimate standards from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court. These adjacent improvements would be designed in accordance with all applicable roadway design standards set forth by the City, which have been established to ensure safe and efficient vehicular circulation on City roadway facilities. As such, no sharp curves, dangerous intersections, or incompatible uses would be Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 188 May 2016 introduced by the proposed project. Therefore, impacts associated with hazardous design features or incompatible land uses would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. e) Would the project result in inadequate emergency access? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with emergency access to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. To facilitate vehicle traffic, the project site would have direct access to both Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard. The proposed project would be accessible to vehicles via two future access points provided from Gene Autry Way. In addition to these two project entrances from Gene Autry Way, the proposed project would also be accessible to vehicles via the existing signalized intersection at Artisan Court and State College Boulevard. Each of these project driveways would be designed and constructed according to City standards and under the direction of a licensed and qualified traffic engineer. Similarly, Union Street, Private Street, Artisan Court, and parking areas would be designed to comply with City width, clearance, and turning-radius requirements. The project site would be accessible to emergency responders during construction and operation of the proposed project. Therefore, impacts associated with emergency access would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. f) Would the project conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with alternative transportation facilities to be less than significant. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project would include pedestrian facilities intended to reduce vehicle trips in the immediate project area. Additionally, as a mixed-use community with both residential and retail uses, the proposed project is intended to facilitate trip reduction, consistent with the City’s objectives. Further, the project area is widely served by public transit provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority. Thus, implementation of the proposed project Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 189 May 2016 would not adversely affect public transit or other forms of alternative transportation, including bicycle and pedestrian facilities. The PTMLUP integrates design standards for bus stops, pedestrian walkways, and the bike system to promote alternative forms of transportation to residents and workers in the project area. Additionally, the nearby Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center directly supports the alternative transportation policy, and the Platinum Triangle would be served by Amtrak, Metrolink commuter rail, and Orange County Transportation Authority bus services. Therefore, impacts associated with alternative transportation facilities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.16.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measures related to transportation and traffic, which are applicable to the proposed project: MM 9-1 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building with commercial, office, and/or institutional uses, the property owners/developer shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office. Objectives of the TDM program shall be:  Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests.  Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project- generated trips.  Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership. MM 9-2 Prior to the first Final Building and Zoning inspection for each building with commercial, office, or institutional uses, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and approval a menu of Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, to include, but not be limited to, the list below. The property owner/developer shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation.  On-site services such as the food, retail, and other services be provided. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 190 May 2016  Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare.  Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs.  Transit Pass. Southern California Rapid Transit District and Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes be promoted through financial assistance and on-site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region.  Shuttle Service. A commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project be generated, and a local shuttle program offered to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile.  Bicycling. A Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers be provided as part of this program, Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options.  Guaranteed Ride Home Program. A program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift.  Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. An incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips.  Stagger work shifts.  Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees.  Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem).  Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 191 May 2016  Access. Preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles may be provided.  Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. (Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools.)  Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Employees offered financial incentives for bicycling to work.  Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Ticket/passes to special events, vacation, etc. be offered to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs.  Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. Every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact who will be responsible for coordinating with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on-site coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the project with the ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. MM 9-3 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, for each building with office and/or commercial uses, the property owner/developer shall join and financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program, if established and, shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network/Transportation Management Association in conjunction with the on-going operation of the project. The property owner/developer shall also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in the program ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. MM 9-4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees, Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 192 May 2016 improvements provided by the property owner/developer; and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established. MM 9-5 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. MM 9-6 Prior to approval of a Development Agreement for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property owner/developers shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when the improvements identified in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parson Brinkerhoff, August 2010 (Appendix F of the SEIR) shall be designed and constructed. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to implement traffic improvements as identified in the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of service as defined by the City’s General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339, Orange County Congestion Management Program and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. MM 9-7 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair-share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 193 May 2016 jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-share calculations shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-way, and construction costs, unless alternative funding sources have been identified to help pay for the improvement. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. MM 9-8 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation with the City of Orange: a. The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair- share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis. b. The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange. c. The Proposed Project shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair-share cost prior to issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities. d. The City shall work with the City of Orange to amend the Joint Communities Facilities Agreement (JCFA) to ensure that fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial and intersection impacts in the City or Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible. MM 9-9 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans: a. The traffic study will identify the Project’s proportionate impact on the specific freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair share Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 194 May 2016 percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339 and established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. b. The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with Caltrans. MM 9-10 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City. MM 9-11 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts generated by the project. MM 9-13 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, for each building with office and/or commercial uses, the property owner/developer shall submit proof to the Public Works, Transit Planning Division that the property owner/developer has entered into an agreement with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) for the provision of a transit shuttle service between the project, the existing Metrolink Station and future Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) as well as major activity centers in between. The agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records of the Office of the County Recorder, Orange County, California. The form of the agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. The agreement shall provide for the following: a. A shuttle route plan, approved by the Public Works Department, Transit Planning Division and ATN, shall be attached and incorporated into the agreement. The plan shall include co-location of stops with Orange County Transportation Authority bus stop locations and other properties in Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 195 May 2016 the Platinum Triangle where feasible and determined appropriate by the Public Works Transit Planning Division and ATN. The property owner/developer shall pay all costs associated with the preparation of the shuttle route plan. b. The property owner/developer shall provide the full cost associated with providing the shuttle, including, but not limited to, purchasing the shuttle vehicle and all costs associated with operating and marketing the shuttle route. c. The agreement shall provide a mechanism for the property owner/developer to request fair share participation from other major activity centers to be served by this shuttle route. The mechanism shall be subject to the approval of the ATN. d. The agreement shall set forth a schedule for commencement of operation of the shuttle service. e. The agreement shall provide that the property owner/developer’s obligations to fund the shuttle service may be cancelled only upon prior written approval from the Public Works Department, Transit Planning Division once a new transit service has taken its place. f. That to the extent permitted by law the terms of this agreement shall constitute covenants which shall run with the property for the benefit thereof, and the benefits of this agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and all successors in interest to the parties hereto.. MM 9-14 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. MM 9-15 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 196 May 2016 3.17 Utilities and Service Systems The following analysis is based, in part, on the January 2016 Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire & Domestic Water Service study prepared by KHR Associates and included as Appendix J of this document. a) Would the project exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with wastewater treatment requirements to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 10-1 through 10-6. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Wastewater generated in the City is transported by trunk sewers to the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Reclamation Plant No. 1, located in the City of Fountain Valley, and Reclamation Plant No. 2, located in the City of Huntington Beach. OCSD plans to upgrade the level of wastewater treatment at both of its treatment plants to meet secondary treatment standards for the projected 2020 effluent flow of 240 to 320 million gallons per day. The effluent discharge to the ocean is a blend of advanced primary and secondary treated wastewater, as specified in the OCSD’s NPDES permit. Both of these reclamation plants are required to comply with the treatment requirements specified in the NPDES permits issued by the Regional Water Quality Control Board. SEIR No. 339 found that build-out of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including development of project site as previously analyzed in the SEIR, would not exceed the wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board with implementation of Mitigation Measures 10-1 through 10-6, and, as such, would not cause treatment requirements to be violated. Therefore, with incorporation of the mitigation measures from the SEIR, impacts associated with wastewater treatment requirements would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 197 May 2016 b) Would the project require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with new or expanded water and wastewater treatment facilities to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 10-1 through 10-16. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Water Treatment Facilities As discussed in SEIR No. 339, build-out of the Platinum Triangle would result in a total demand of 5,249 acre-feet of potable water per year associated with residential, commercial, office, institutional, and park land uses. Rule 15-D of Anaheim’s Water Rules, Rates and Regulations (Plan No. W2524D) specifies approved water facility improvements in the project vicinity that either have been completed or are in the planning stages. Rule 15-D specifies the water facility improvements required to accommodate the projected land-use water demands within the City, including the Platinum Triangle. Ultimately, changes in land-use projections and addition of water facilities will require updating Rule 15-D; however, under Rule 15-D prior to adoption of SEIR No. 339, the projected demands for new office, commercial, and industrial land uses associated with the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project had already been accounted for in determining water facility improvements. The only significant changes, in terms of projected demand quantity, were the demands resulting from residential dwelling units associated with the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. However, upon implementation of Mitigation Measure 10-6 from the SEIR, Rule 15-D was amended with specific improvements required to ensure that adequate water facilities were provided to serve the residential units of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. The underlying zoning for the project site is Industrial; however, under the PTMLUP, the project site is also designated as mixed-use as part of the PTMU Overlay Zone, which allows office, retail, and residential uses to occur in proximity to each other or within the same building. The PTMU Overlay Zone also allows existing underlying zoning to remain in place. Property owners may continue operating under the existing zoning designation, or, if they choose, they may take advantage of the opportunities to develop under the requirements of the PTMU Overlay Zone. Additionally, the proposed project, in terms of land use and density, would be consistent with that analyzed in the SEIR. As such, the Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 198 May 2016 proposed project would not result in potable water demand that exceeds that assumed for the project site in the SEIR, and Mitigation Measures 10-6 and 10-8 from SEIR No. 339 would ensure that adequate water facilities would be provided to serve the proposed project. Therefore, with incorporation of the mitigation measures from the SEIR, impacts associated with water treatment facilities and capacities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from that identified in SEIR No. 339. Wastewater Treatment Facilities SEIR No. 339 found that the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would require upsizing of 7,373 linear feet of sewer pipe. Mitigation Measures 10-1 through 10-6 from SEIR No. 339 proposed to ensure that adequate wastewater facilities would be provided to serve the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Besides upsizing the sewer pipe, no other facilities would require upgrading, and no new facilities would need to be constructed to accommodate the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. Considering the proposed project would be consistent with the land use and less than the density assumptions analyzed in SEIR No. 339, the proposed project would not result in wastewater treatment demand that exceeds that assumed for the project site in the SEIR. Therefore, with incorporation of these mitigation measures from the SEIR, impacts associated with wastewater treatment facilities and capacities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. c) Would the project require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with stormwater drainage facilities to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measure 10-17. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As discussed in Section 3.9, the proposed project would include a new stormwater drainage and treatment system, to be constructed within the project site. Under the post- development conditions, stormwater would be collected within the storm drain system by roof drains, area drains, and/or drop inlets. The low stormwater flows would be routed to a perforated corrugated steel pipe for infiltration, and the high flows would bypass the Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 199 May 2016 treatment system and discharge off site into the municipal storm drain system. Stormwater runoff from paved parking area would pass through either Modular Wetlands units or Contech StormFilter media vaults for pretreatment prior to infiltration. Runoff within the public park would be directed to infiltration basins. Stormwater runoff from the disturbed right-of-way areas would be directed into the parkways and infiltrated through bioretention planters. A Drainage Study (Appendix G) was prepared to evaluate the hydrologic effect of the proposed project on local water resources in terms of stormwater quantity and quality. The Drainage Study provides a design analysis for the stormwater drainage facilities proposed, including implementation and maintenance of the proposed infiltration, non- structural and structural source-control BMPs. The Drainage Study fulfills the requirements of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan and the Orange County Hydrology Manual, and describes implementation and maintenance of BMPs to be installed on the project site. Stormwater flows from both 10- and 25-year storm events were modeled as part of the Drainage Study. Hydrological modeling found that although the amount of impervious surfaces would generally remain the same under post-development conditions, because of the new stormwater drainage and treatment system, which would retain stormwater on the project site for longer durations, the project site would experience an overall net reduction in peak stormwater discharges during modeled storm events. This new stormwater drainage system is an ancillary component of the proposed project, and all associated improvements would be contained to the development footprint being analyzed herein. As such, any potential environmental effects as a result of construction and operation of this new stormwater drainage system are discussed and evaluated in this document, and no new or additional impacts, outside of those already addressed and analyzed in this Addendum, would occur. Therefore, with incorporation of these mitigation measures from the SEIR, impacts associated with stormwater drainage facilities would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. d) Would the project have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with water supplies to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 10-7 through 10-16. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 200 May 2016 Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.17(b), above. e) Would the project result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider, which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with wastewater treatment service to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 10-1 through 10-6. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. Refer to response in Section 3.17(b). f) Would the project be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with landfill capacity to be less than significant with the incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 10-18 through 10-20. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As addressed in SEIR No. 339, the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be served by the Olinda Alpha Landfill. The Olinda Alpha Landfill accepts a daily maximum of 8,000 tons. It has a permitted closure date of 2021 but has remaining capacity through 2030 (County of Orange 2014). Considering the proposed project would be consistent with the land use and density assumptions analyzed within the SEIR, projected solid waste generation rates would not substantially differ from those rates identified in the SEIR. As such, projected solid waste generated in the City upon build- out of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which includes the proposed project, would be adequately accommodated by the Olinda Alpha Landfill. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measures 10-18 through 10-20 from the SEIR, impacts associated with landfill capacity would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 201 May 2016 g) Would the project comply with federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Previous Significance Determination: SEIR No. 339 found impacts associated with solid waste statutes and regulations to be less than significant with incorporation of SEIR Mitigation Measures 10-18 through 10-20. Project-Specific Analysis and Significance Determination: No substantial change from previous analysis. As discussed in Section 3.17(f), the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would be served by the Olinda Alpha Landfill. This facility is permitted to receive municipal solid waste and is required to comply with all applicable federal, state, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste. SEIR No. 339 found that implementation of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project would generate increased construction and operation solid waste in the area. However, the proposed project would be required to submit project plans to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Therefore, with incorporation of Mitigation Measures 10-18 through 10-20 from the SEIR, impacts associated with solid waste statutes and regulations would be less than significant, and the level of impact would not increase from the level identified in SEIR No. 339. 3.17.1 Previous Mitigation Measures Applicable to Proposed Project SEIR No. 339 recommended the following mitigation measures related to utilities and service systems, which are applicable to the proposed project: MM 10-1 The City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as identified in the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 202 May 2016 the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the project area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof. MM 10-2 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner/ developer shall coordinate with the OCSD to ensure that all improvements and construction schedules are coordinated. MM 10-3 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall contact Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding sewer capacity. Additionally, if requested by the OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a month to verify capacity and ensure consistency with the OCSD’s modeling results. MM 10-4 Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for each development project, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade structures of the proposed development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Where requested by the City Engineer, sewer improvements shall be constructed with larger than recommended diameter to maintain the surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above the hydraulic grade line elevation of the surcharge levels when they are above the pipe crown. MM 10-5 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will be upsizing truck lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD to ensure that backflow prevention devices are installed at the lateral connections to prevent surcharge flow from entering private properties. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 203 May 2016 MM 10-6 Prior to final design approval, additional analysis shall be performed for each individual project using flow, wet-weather data, and other information specific for that project in order to obtain more accurate results of the surcharge levels for final design. MM 10-7 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following:  Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible;  Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash down of exterior areas;  Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals;  Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains;  Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors;  Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals;  Low-flow shower heads in hotels;  Infrared sensors on drinking fountains;  Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are lowest;  Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using appliances;  Cooling tower recirculating system;  Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system;  Use of waterway recirculation systems;  Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation; and  Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 204 May 2016 In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans. MM 10-8 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide engineering studies, including network analysis, to size the water mains for ultimate development within the project. This includes detailed water usage analysis and building plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval in determining project water requirements and appropriate water assessment fees. MM 10-9 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures). MM 10-12 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. MM 10-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient appliances. MM 10-14 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines for recycled water. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. MM 10-15 Prior to approval of a project that exceeds the statutory thresholds set forth in SB 610 and SB 221, the applicant shall demonstrate to the City Engineer that adequate water supply exists to serve the Proposed Project. If it cannot be demonstrated that adequate water exists to serve the specific project, the project shall not be approved. MM 10-17 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall review the location of each Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 205 May 2016 project to determine if it is located within an area served by deficient drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the project will increase stormwater flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate master plan drainage study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient storm drain system or will create a deficiency in an existing storm drain, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the drainage facilities, as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final Building and Zoning inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof. MM 10-18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at its discretion, the following plan components:  Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities.  Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency.  Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing.  Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 206 May 2016  Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible.  Prohibiting curbside pick-up.  Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and city regulations. MM 10-19 Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer:  Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging.  Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard.  Collection of office paper for recycling.  Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. MM 10-20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a Demolition and Import/Export Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site. MM 10-21 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that each structure will exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department Business and Community Programs Division. This consultation shall take place during project design in order to review Title 24 measures that are incorporated into the project design energy efficient practices and allow potential system alternatives such as Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 207 May 2016 thermal energy storage air condition, lighting, and building envelope options. Plans submitted for building permits shall show the proposed energy efficiencies and systems alternatives. MM 10-22 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance with Title 24, which may include the following:  High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control.  Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution.  Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle.  Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads.  Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas.  Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air handling units, and fan-coil units).  Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces.  Use of compact fluorescent lamps.  Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps.  Use of EnergyStar® exit lighting or exit signage.  Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified.  Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high- pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots.  Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods.  Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: o New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems. o New Construction – Cash incentives $400 kW or $0.15 per kWh saved for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency that exceed Title 24 requirements. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 208 May 2016 o Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance.  Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush (gpf) or less).  Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf).  Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation.  Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping. MM 10-23 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities:  Relocate Southern California Edison transmission line underground on Katella Avenue from west of the Union Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850 feet).  Relocate Southern California Edison communication line underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to east of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).  Relocate distribution circuits underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim Way to State College Boulevard (1,500 feet).  Relocation a distribution circuit underground on Orangewood Avenue from State College Boulevard to west of the Santa Ana River (1,600 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College Boulevard (2,500 feet). Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 209 May 2016  A new distribution duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Lewis Street from Katella Avenue to Gene Autry Way (950 feet).  Relocate a distribution circuit underground on Douglas Street from Katella Avenue to Cerritos Avenue (1,000 feet). MM 10-24 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans for review and approval which shall ensure that buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code) by a minimum of 10 percent. MM 10-25 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of underground systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities:  Two new distribution duct banks on Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to Lewis Street (800 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell Avenue (2,000 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on State College Boulevard from Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Ave. from I-5 to the Santa Ana River (4,800 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from Haster Street to the east side of I-5 (2,500 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College Boulevard (2,500 feet). Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 210 May 2016  A new transmission duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet).  A new transmission duct bank on Lewis Street and Santa Cruz Street from Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,000 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on the east side of the Angel Stadium parking lot from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57 (2,000 feet).  A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue (4,000 feet). MM 10-26 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, the property owner/developer shall provide an electrical load analysis to the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD). The analysis shall include a load schedule and maximum electrical coincident demand. Should the property owner/developer’s load analysis result in a contributed load forecast to exceed 20 mega volt-amperes (MVA) above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the electrical system currently serving the Platinum Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction of a new electrical substation within the Platinum Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees for the electrical substation will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations, or another financial mechanism approved by the City. 3.18 Mandatory Findings of Significance a) Does the project have the potential to degrade the quality of the environment, substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal, or eliminate important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory? No substantial change from previous analysis. As discussed and analyzed in this document, the proposed project would not degrade the quality of the environment. Additionally, for the reasons discussed in Section 3.4, the proposed project would not substantially reduce the habitat of a fish or wildlife species, cause a fish or wildlife population to drop below self-sustaining levels, threaten to eliminate a plant or animal community, or reduce the number or restrict the range of a rare or endangered plant or animal. Further, for the reasons identified in Section 3.5, the project site does not contain any important examples of the major periods of California history or prehistory, and no Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 211 May 2016 impacts to such resources would occur. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact as previously analyzed in SEIR No. 339. b) Does the project have impacts that are individually limited, but cumulatively considerable? (“Cumulatively considerable” means that the incremental effects of a project are considerable when viewed in connection with the effects of past projects, the effects of other current projects, and the effects of probable future projects)? No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project has the potential to result in incremental environmental impacts that are part of a series of approvals that were anticipated under SEIR No. 339. The SEIR considered the project’s cumulatively considerable impacts where effects had the potential to degrade the quality of the environment as a result of build-out of the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project. The SEIR determined that cumulative air quality impacts were significant and unavoidable. A statement of overriding considerations was adopted as a result. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new cumulative impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant cumulative impact as previously analyzed in SEIR No. 339. c) Does the project have environmental effects which will cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly? No substantial change from previous analysis. The proposed project would not create adverse environmental effects that would cause substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly. Assuming future approval of the proposed project, the Jefferson Stadium Park project would allow for development of the project site with a mixed-use community consisting of 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; a 1.11-acre public park; ancillary on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated improvements. None of these uses or activities would result in any substantial adverse effects on human beings, either directly or indirectly, as discussed throughout this document. Therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in any new impacts or increase the severity of a previously identified significant impact as previously analyzed in SEIR No. 339. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 212 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 213 May 2016 4 REFERENCES AND PREPARERS 4.1 References Cited 14 CCR 15000–15387 and Appendices A through L. Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. California Building Standards Commission. 2013. California Building Code. Accessed March 2016. http://www.ecodes.biz/ecodes_support/Free_Resources/2013California/ 13Building/13Building_main.html. California Department of Conservation. 2004. Agricultural Preserves 2004: Williamson Act Parcels Map for Orange County, California. Accessed March 2016. ftp://ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dlrp/wa/Orange_WA_03_04.pdf. California Department of Conservation. 2014. California Important Farmland Finder. Accessed March 2016. http://maps.conservation.ca.gov/ciff/. California Department of Finance. 2015. E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2011–2015 with 2010 Census Benchmark. Accessed May 2016. http://www.dof.ca.gov/research/demographic/reports/estimates/e-5/2011-20/view.php. California Public Resources Code, Section 21000–21177. California Environmental Quality Act, as amended. Caltrans. 2002. Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. http://www.dot.ca.gov/ hq/tpp/offices/ocp/igr_ceqa_files/tisguide.pdf Caltrans (California Department of Transportation). 2011. California Scenic Highway Mapping Program. Accessed March 2016. http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/16_livability/ scenic_highways/index.htm. CAPCOA (California Air Pollution Control Officers Association). 2008. CEQA & Climate Change: Evaluating and Addressing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Projects Subject to the California Environmental Quality Act. January 2008. CARB (California Air Resources Board). 2005. Air Quality and Land Use Handbook: A Community Health Perspective. April 2005. http://www.arb.ca.gov/ch/landuse.htm. CARB. 2008. Climate Change Scoping Plan: A Framework for Change. December 2008. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/document/scopingplandocument.htm. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 214 May 2016 CARB. 2014a. “Area Designation Maps/State and National.” Last updated August 22, 2014. http://www.arb.ca.gov/desig/adm/adm.htm. CARB. 2014b. First Update to the Climate Change Scoping Plan Building on the Framework Pursuant to AB 32 – The California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. May 2014. http://www.arb.ca.gov/cc/scopingplan/2013_update/first_update_climate_change_ scoping_plan.pdf. CDFW (California Department of Fish and Wildlife). 2016. RareFind 5, Version 5.1.1. Biogeographic Data Branch. Sacramento, California: California Natural Diversity Database. Accessed February 24, 2016. https://map.dfg.ca.gov/rarefind/ view/RareFind.aspx. CEQA Guidelines Sections 15160–15170. Title 14, California Code of Regulations. Chapter 3, Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act. Article 11, Types of EIRs. City of Anaheim. 2010a. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (SCH #2004121045). Accessed March 2016. http://www.anaheimconventioncenter.com/1075/Report-Number-339. City of Anaheim. 2010b. The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Final Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (SCH #2004121045). Accessed March 2016. http://www.anaheimconventioncenter.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/3101. City of Anaheim. 2011. 2010 Urban Water Management Plan. Accessed March 2016. http://www.anaheimconventioncenter.com/DocumentCenter/Home/View/1627. City of Anaheim. 2014 (Updated). the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Accessed March 2016. http://www.anaheimconventioncenter.com/DocumentCenter/View/2879. City of Anaheim. 2015 (Updated). City of Anaheim General Plan. Accessed March 2016. http://www.anaheimconventioncenter.com/712/General-Plan. City of Anaheim. 2016 (Updated). Anaheim Municipal Code. Accessed March 2016. http://www.amlegal.com/codes/client/anaheim_ca/. City of Anaheim. n.d. Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. http://www.anaheimconventioncenter.com/DocumentCenter/View/366. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 215 May 2016 City of Santa Ana. 2010. City of Santa Ana Transit Zoning Code (SD 84A and SD 84B) Final Environmental Impact Report (SCH No. 2006071100). CNPS (California Native Plant Society Rare Plant Program). 2016. Inventory of Rare and Endangered Plants (online edition, v8-02). California Native Plant Society, Sacramento, California. Accessed February 24, 2016. http://www.rareplants.cnps.org/. CNRA (California Natural Resources Agency). 2009a. “Notice of Public Hearings and Notice of Proposed Amendment of Regulations Implementing the California Environmental Quality Act.” Sacramento, California: CNRA. http://www.ceres.ca.gov/ceqa/docs/ Notice_of_Proposed_Action.pdf. CNRA. 2009b. Final Statement of Reasons for Regulatory Action: Amendments to the State CEQA Guidelines Addressing Analysis and Mitigation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Pursuant to SB97. December 2009. County of Orange. 2014. SWANA 2014 Landfill Management Excellence Award. https://swana.org/portals/0/awards/2014/Landfill%20Management/Orange%20County %20LandfillManagement.pdf. EPA (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency). 2015. Region 9: Air Quality Analysis, Air Quality Maps. Last updated October 13, 2015. http://www.epa.gov/region9/air/maps/. FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency). 2009. Flood Insurance Rate Map No. 06059C0142J. Accessed March 2016. http://fema.maps.arcgis.com/home/webmap/ viewer.html?webmap=cbe088e7c8704464aa0fc34eb99e7f30&extent=- 117.91215702661188,33.79380755494833,-117.87061497338813,33.80557605219026. FHWA (Federal Highway Administration). 2008. Roadway Construction Noise Model. December 2008 Federal Interagency Committee on Aviation Noise (FICAN). 1997. Effects of Aviation Noise on Awakenings from Sleep. FTA (Federal Transit Administration). 2006. Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment. FTA-VA-90=1003-06. May 2006. Accessed October 2015. http://www.fta.dot.gov/ documents/FTA_Noise_and_Vibration_Manual.pdf. Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE). 2012. Trip Generation manual, 9TH Edition. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 216 May 2016 Mestre Greve Associates. 2011. Noise Assessment for Historic Town Center City of San Juan Capistrano. January 2011. OPR (Governor’s Office of Planning and Research). 2008. CEQA and Climate Change: Addressing Climate Change through California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Review. PBS&J. 2009. Noise Abatement Decision Report for the I-215 in Riverside County from Scott Road to Nuevo Road Add One Mixed Flow Lane in Each Direction. SCAG (Southern California Association of Governments). 2012. 2012–2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS): Towards a Sustainable Future. April 2012. http://rtpscs.scag.ca.gov/Documents/2012/final/ f2012RTPSCS.pdf. SCAQMD (South Coast Air Quality Management District). 2008. Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Threshold. October 2008. SCAQMD. 2009. Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology. Revised July 2009. SCAQMD. 2010. “Greenhouse Gases CEQA Significance Thresholds Working Group Meeting No. 15.” September 28, 2010. http://www.aqmd.gov/docs/default-source/ ceqa/handbook/greenhouse-gases-(ghg)-ceqa-significance-thresholds/year-2008- 2009/ghg-meeting-15/ghg-meeting-15-main-presentation.pdf?sfvrsn=2. SCAQMD. 2013. Final 2012 Air Quality Management Plan. Revised February 2013. SCAQMD. 2015. SCAQMD Air Quality Significance Thresholds. Originally published in CEQA Air Quality Handbook, Table A9-11-A. Revised March 2015. http://www.aqmd.gov/ docs/default-source/ceqa/handbook/scaqmd-air-quality-significance- thresholds.pdf?sfvrsn=2. USFWS (U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service). 2016a. Environmental Conservation Online System, Information for Planning and Conservation Report (online edition, v2.3.2). Accessed February 24, 2016. http://ecos.fws.gov/ipac/. USFWS. 2016b. National Wetlands Inventory, Wetlands Mapper (online edition). Accessed February 24, 2016. http://www.fws.gov/wetlands/Data/Mapper.html. USGS (United States Geological Survey). 2008. National Seismic Hazard Maps – Fault Parameters. http://geohazards.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_search/hf_search_main.cfm. Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 217 May 2016 Wachtell, J.K. 1978. Soil Survey of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, California. USDA, Soil Conservation Service and Forest Service. Washington, D.C. 4.2 List of Preparers City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Susan Kim, Principal Planner Scott Koehm, Senior Planner Christine Saunders, Associate Planner Dudek – Environmental Consultant Dudek 31878 Camino Capistrano, Suite 200 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Collin Ramsey, Project Manager Caitlin Munson, Environmental Planner Michelle Webb, Environmental Analyst Ian McIntire, Air Quality Analyst Ryan Henry, Senior Biologist Adriane Dorrier, Archaeologist Mike Greene, Senior Noise Analyst Anne McDonnell, Technical Editor Devin Brookhart, Publications Specialist Lead Rachel Strobridge, GIS Technical Consultants Cultural Resources Memorandum Dudek 31878 Camino Capistrano, Suite 200 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 218 May 2016 Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan; Drainage Study; Traffic Impact Study; and Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire and Domestic Water Service Study KHR Associates 4100 Newport Place Drive, Suite 200 Newport Beach, California 92660 Geotechnical Exploration Report Leighton and Associates 17781 Cowan Irvine, California 92614 Phase I ESA Vertex 400 Libbey Parkway Weymouth, Massachusetts 02189 APPENDIX A SEIR Summary of Environmental Impacts, Mitigation Measures, and Level of Significance After Mitigation (Table 1–4 of Final SEIR No. 339) 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 5. 1 A E S T H E T I C S 5. 1 - 1 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d a l t e r t h e v i s u a l a p p e a r a n c e of t h e p r o j e c t a r e a . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e as u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e w a s i n c l u d e d i n th e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t o f th e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 33 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A i s s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 1- 1 Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a A s p a r t o f t h e F i n a l S i t e P l a n a p p l i c a t i o n, w h e r e a d j a c e n t u s e s a r e de e m e d t o b e s h a d o w s e n s i t i v e ( i . e . e. g . , r e s i d e n t i a l , r e c r e a t i o n a l , o u t d o o r r e s t a u r a n t s , a n d pe d e s t r i a n a r e a s ) , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r f o r f u t u r e d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s s h a l l de m o n s t r a t e t h a t t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t w o u l d no t p r e c l u d e s h a d o w s e n s i t i v e r e c e p t o r s ’ ex p o s u r e t o n a t u r a l s u n l i g h t f o r a t l e a s t 5 0 p e r c e n t o f d u r a t i o n f o r t h e s e a s o n , f o r a t l e a s t 5 0 pe r c e n t o f t h e s h a d e - s e n s i t i v e a r e a , t o t h e sa t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r . ( 5. 1 - 1 ) Less than significant 5. 2 A I R Q U A L I T Y 5. 2 - 1 : C o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s as s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e P r o p o s e d Pr o j e c t w o u l d g e n e r a t e su b s t a n t i a l l y m o r e s h o r t - t e r m a i r po l l u t a n t s c o m p a r e d t o t h e Ad o p t e d M a s t e r L a n d U s e P l a n an d w o u l d c o n t i n u e t o e x c e e d So u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y Ma n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t ’ s r e g i o n a l si g n i f i c a n c e t h r e s h o l d s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e as u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d in U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 p r e p a r e d f o r t h e P l at i n u m T r i a n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 20 0 5 , a s p a r t o f t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l Im p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 ( F S E I R N o . 3 3 2 ) , a n d a r e ap p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . ( F o r m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s t o r e d u ce e n e r g y c o n s u m p t i o n , s e e a l s o Ch a p t e r 5 . 1 0 , Ut i l i t i e s a n d S e r v i c e S y s t e m s ). A d d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d in s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e r e f e r e n c e n u m b e r f o r e a c h me a s u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A i s s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). Co n s t r u c t i o n 2- 1 O n g o i n g d u r i n g g r a d i n g a n d c o ns t r u c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / de v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e fo r r e q u i r i n g c o n t r a c t o r s t o i m p l e m e n t th e f o l l o w i n g m e a s u r e s t o r e d u c e c o n s t r u c t i o n - r e l a t e d em i s s i o n s ; h o w e v e r , t h e r e s u l t a n t v a l u e is e x p e c t e d t o r e m a i n s i g n i f i c a n t . ( 5. 2 - 1 ) a) T h e c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l e n s u r e th a t a l l c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m e n t i s b e i n g p r o p e r l y s e r v i c e d an d m a i n t a i n e d in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r ’ s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s t o r e d u c e op e r a t i o n a l e m i s s i o n s . b) W h e r e f e a s i b l e , t h e Th e co n t r a c t o r s h a l l u s e Ti e r 3 o r h i g h e r , a s i d e n t i f i e d b y t h e Un i t e d S t a t e s E n v i r o n m e n t a l P r o t e c t i o n Ag e n c y , o f f - r o a d c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m e n t wi t h h i g h e r a i r p o l l u t a n t e m i s s i o n s s t an d a r d s f o r e q u i p m e n t g r e a t e r t h a n 5 0 ho r s e p o w e r , b a s e d o n m a n u fa c t u r e r ’ s a v a i l a b i l i t y . lo w e m i s s i o n m o b i l e co n s t r u c t i o n . c) T h e c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l u t i l i z e e x i s t i n g p o w e r s o u r c e s ( e . g . , p o w e r p o l e s ) o r c l e a n - f u e l ge n e r a t o r s r a t h e r t h a n t e m p o r a r y di e s e l - po w e r g e n e r a t o r s , w h e r e f e a s i b l e . 2- 2 O n g o i n g d u r i n g g r a d i n g a n d co n s t r u c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t t h e Significant and unavoidable 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 4 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation f o ll ow i ng me a s u r e s i n a dd i t i on to t h e ex i st i ng re q u i re m e n t s f or f ug i t i ve d us t co n t r o l un d er So u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e nt D i s t r i c t R u l e 4 0 3 t o f u r t h e r r e d u c e i n o r d e r t o r e d u c e PM 10 an d P M 2.5 em i s s i o n s . T o a s s u r e c o m p l i a n c e , t h e C i t y s h a l l v e r i f y c o m p l i a n c e t h a t th e s e m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n i m p l e m e n t e d d u r i n g no r m a l c o n s t r u c t i o n s i t e i n s p e c t i o n s . T h e me a s u r e s t o b e i m p l e m e n t e d a r e l i s t e d b e l o w : ( 5. 2 - 2 ) a) T h e p r o p e rt y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t st a n d a r d m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h S o u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a na g e m e n t D i s t r i c t ’ s R u l e s 4 0 2 a n d 4 0 3 , t o co n t r o l f u g i t i v e d u s t e m i s s i o n s a n d e n s u r e t h a t n u i s a n c e d u s t c o n d i t i o n s d o n o t o c c u r du r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n. b) In a d d i t i o n t o t h e s t a n d a r d m e a s u r e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t su p p l e m e n t a l m e a s u r e s a s f e a s ib l e t o r e d u c e f u g i t i v e d u s t e m i s s i o n s t o t h e e x t e n t fe a s i b l e d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n o p e r a t i o n s . T o a s s u r e c o m p l i a n c e , t h e C i t y s h a l l v e r i f y co m p l i a n c e t h a t t h e s e m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n im p l e m e n t e d d u r i n g n o r m a l c o n s t r u c t i o n si t e i n s p e c t i o n s . T h e m e a s u r e s t o b e i m p l e m e n t e d a r e l i s t e d b e l o w : a) o Du r i n g a l l g r a d i n g a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r o p er t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n co n t r a c t o r s h a l l r R e- e s t a b l i s h g r o u n d c o v e r o n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n s i t e t h r o u g h s e e d i n g an d w a t e r i n g a s q u i c k l y a s p o s s i b l e t o a c h i e v e a m i n i m u m c o n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r PM 10 o f 5 p e r c e n t . b) o Du r i n g a l l g r a d i n g a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r o p er t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n co n t r a c t o r s h a l l a p p l y ch e m i c a l s o i l s t a b i l i z e r s P a v e t o o n - s i t e h a u l r o a d s t o ac h i e v e a c o n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r P M 10 o f 8 5 p e r c e n t c o m p a r e d to t r a v e l o n u n p a v e d , un t r e a t e d r o a d s . c) o Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l p P ha s e g r a d i n g to p r e v e n t t h e s u s c e p t i b i l i t y o f l a r g e a r e a s to e r o s i o n o v e r e x t e n d e d p e r i o d s o f t i m e . d) o Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l s S ch e d u l e ac t i v i t i e s t o m i n i m i z e t h e a m o u n t o f e x p o s e d e x c a v a t e d s o i l d u r i n g a n d a f t e r t h e e n d o f wo r k p e r i o d s . Dis p o s e o f s u r p l u s e x c a v a t e d m a t e r i a l i n a c c o r d an c e w i t h l o c a l o r d i na n c e s a n d u s e s o u n d en g i n e e r i n g p r a c t i c e s . Re s t o r e l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n t h a t a r e r e m o v e d d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n i n co o r d i n a t i o n w i t h l o ca l p u b l i c a g e n c i e s . e) o Du r i n g a l l c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n co n t r a c t o r s h a l l s S we e p s t r e e t s wi t h R u l e 1 1 8 6 – c o m p l i a n t P M 10 –e f f i c i e n t v a c u u m un i t s o n a d a i l y b a s i s i f s i l t i s c a r r i e d o v e r t o a d j a c e n t p u b l i c t h o r o u g h f a r e s o r o c c u r s as a r e s u l t o f h a u l i n g . f) o Du r i n g a c t i v e d e m o l i t i o n a n d d e b r i s re m o v a l a n d g r a d i n g , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c ti o n c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l s S us p e n d de m o l i t i o n a n d gr a d i n g op e r a t i o n s wh e n du r i n g h i g h w i n d s s p e e d s e x c e e d 2 5 m i l e s p e r h o u r t o a c h i e v e a n 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 5 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation em i s s i o n s c o n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r P M 10 u n d e r w o r s t - c a s e w i n d c o n d i t i o n s o f 9 8 pe r c e n t i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h R u l e 4 0 3 r e q u i r e m e n t s . Wa s h o f f t r u c k s l e a v i n g s i t e . g) o Du r i n g a l l c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n co n t r a c t o r s h a l l m M ai n t a i n a m i n i m u m 1 2 - i n c h f r e e b o a r d r a t i o o n h a u l t r u c k s h a u l i n g di r t , s a n d , s o i l , o r o t h e r l o o s e m a t e r i a l s a n d t a r p m a t e r i a l s w i t h a f a b r i c c o v e r o r ot h e r s u i t a b l e m e a n s t o a c h i e v e a c o n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r P M 10 o f 9 1 p e r c e n t . o Co v e r p a y l o a d s o n t r u c k s h a u l i n g s o i l u s i n g t a r p s o r o th e r s u i t a b l e m e a n s . h) D u r i n g a l l c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n co n t r a c t o r s h a l l w a t e r e x p o s e d g r o u n d s u rf a c e s a n d d i s t u r b e d a r e a s a m i n i m u m o f ev e r y t h r e e h o u r s o n t h e c o ns t r u c t i o n s i t e t o a c h i e v e a n e m i s s i o n s r e d u c t i o n co n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r P M 10 o f 6 1 p e r c e n t . i) D u r i n g a c t i v e d e m o l i t i o n a n d d e b r i s re m o v a l , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s co n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l a p p l y w a t e r t o d i s t u r b e d s o i l s a t t h e e n d o f e a c h d a y to a c h i e v e a n e m i s s i o n c o n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r P M 10 o f 1 0 p e r c e n t . j) D u r i n g s c r a p e r u n l o a d i n g a n d l o a d i n g , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c - ti o n c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l e n s u r e t h a t a c t i v e ly d i s t u r b e d a r e a s m a in t a i n a m i n i m u m s o i l mo i s t u r e c o n t e n t o f 1 2 p e r c e n t b y u s e o f a m o v e a b l e s p r i n k l e r s y s t e m o r w a t e r tr u c k t o a c h i e v e a c o n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r P M 10 o f 6 9 p e r c e n t . k) D u r i n g a l l c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s c o n s t r u c t i o n co n t r a c t o r s h a l l l i m i t o n - s i t e v e h i c l e s p e e d s o n u n p a v e d r o a d s t o n o m o r e t h a n 1 5 mi l e s p e r h o u r t o a c h i e v e a c o n t r o l e f f i c i e n c y f o r P M 10 o f 5 7 p e r c e n t . 2- 3 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f e a c h gr a d i n g p l a n ( f o r I m p o rt / E x p o r t P l a n ) a n d p r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f de m o l i t i o n p e r m i t s ( f o r D e m o l i t i o n P l a n s ) , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t De m o l i t i o n a n d I m p o r t / E x p o r t P l a n s de t a i l i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d de m o l i t i o n ( C & D ) r e c y c l i n g an d w a s t e r e d u c t i o n m e a s u r e s t o b e im p l e m e n t e d t o r e c o v e r C & D m a t e r i a l s . T h e s e p l a n s sh a l l i n c l u d e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f o ff - s i t e l o c a t i o n s f o r m a t e r i a l s e x p o rt f r o m t h e p r o j e c t a n d o p t i o n s fo r d i s p o s a l o f e x c e s s m a t e r i a l . T h e s e o p t i o n s m a y i n c l u d e r e c y c l i n g o f m a t e r i a l s o n - s i t e o r t o an a d j a c e n t s i t e , s a l e t o a s o i l b r o k e r o r c o n t r a c t or , s a l e t o a p r o j e c t i n t h e v i c i n i t y o r t r a n s p o r t to a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r e d l a nd f i l l , w i t h a t t e m p t s m a d e t o mo v e i t w i t h i n O r a n g e C o u n t y . Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l o f f e r r e c y c l a b le b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s , s u c h a s a s p h a l t o r co n c r e t e f o r s a l e o r r e m o v a l b y p r i v a t e f i r m s o r p u b l i c a g e n c i e s f o r u s e i n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f o t h e r pr o j e c t s i f n o t a l l c a n b e r e u s e d a t t h e p r o j e c t s i t e . ( 5. 2 - 3 ) 2- 4 P r i o r t o is s u a n c e a p p r o v a l o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t ev i d e n c e t h a t h i g h - s o l i d s o r w a t e r - b a s e d l o w e m i ss i o n s p a i n t s a n d c o a t i n g s a r e u t i l i z e d i n t h e de s i g n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n o f b u i l d i n g s , i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h S o u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e n t Di s t r i c t ’ s r e g u l a t i o n s . T o e n s u r e t h a t v o l a t i l e o r g a n i c c o m p o u n d s ( V O C ) e m i s s i o n s f r o m ar c h i t e c t u r a l c o a t i n g s d o n o t e x c e e d A Q M D s s i g n if i c a n c e t h r e s h o l d s f o r a r c h i t e c t u r a l c o a t i n g s , 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 6 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation th e n u m b e r o f g a l l o n s o f c o a t i n g s s h a l l b e r e s t r i c t e d , t o th e m a x i m u m e x t e n t f e a s i b l e , t o t h e ma x i m u m d a i l y c o a t i n g u s a g e id e n t i f i e d i n T a b l e 5 . 2 -9 o f t h e S E I R . T h i s i n f o r m a t i o n s h a l l b e de n o t e d o n t h e p r o j e c t p l a n s a n d s p e c i f i c a t i o n s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s ha l l s p e c i f y t h e u s e o f h i g h v o l u m e / l o w p r e s s u r e s p r a y e q u i p m e n t o r h a n d a p p l i c a t i o n . A i r at o m i z e d s p r a y t e c h n i q u e s s h a l l n o t b e p e r m i t t e d. W h e r e f e a s i b l e , t h e pa i n t c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l us e h a n d a p p l i c a t i o n s a s w e l l . Th i s i n f o r m a t i o n s h a l l b e d e n o t e d o n t h e p r o j e c t p l a n s a n d sp e c i f i c a t i o n s . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r ’ s s h a l l s p e c i f y t h e u s e o f h i g h - vo l u m e / l o w - p r e s s u r e s p r a y e q u i p m e n t o r h a n d ap p l i c a t i o n . A i r - a t o m i z e d s p r a y t e c h n i q u e s sh a l l n o t b e p e r m i t t e d . P l a n s s h a l l a l s o s h ow t h a t p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s s h a l l co n s t r u c t / b u i l d w i t h m a t e r i a l s t h a t d o n o t r e q u ir e p a i n t i n g , o r u s e p r ep a i n t e d c o n s t r u c t i o n ma t e r i a l s , t o t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e . (5. 2 - 4 ) Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n No a d d i t i o n m i t i g a t i o n me a s u r e s a r e a v a i l a b l e . 5. 2 - 2 : I m p l e m e n ta t i o n o f t h e Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t w o u l d g e n e r a t e su b s t a n t i a l l y m o r e l o n g - t e r m a i r po l l u t a n t s c o m p a r e d t o t h e Ad o p t e d M a s t e r L a n d U s e P l a n an d w o u l d c o n t i n u e t o e x c e e d So u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y Ma n a g e m e n t D i s t r i c t ’ s r e g i o n a l si g n i f i c a n c e t h r e s h o l d s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M e a s u r e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d in U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 p r e p a r e d f o r t h e P l a t in u m T r i a n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i ty C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , as p a r t o f t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e po r t N o . 3 3 2 , a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d Pr o j e c t . ( F o r m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r es t o r e d u c e e n e r g y c o n s u m p t io n , s e e a l s o C h a p t e r 5 . 1 0 , Ut i l i t i e s a n d Se r v i c e S y s t e m s ). A d d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e re f e r e n c e n u m b e r f o r e a c h m e a s u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A i s s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). Op e r a t i o n 2- 5 I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e t i m i n g r e q u i r e d b y t h e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n sp o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r , b u t n o l a t e r th a n p r i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l B u il d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l im p l e m e n t th e f o l l o w i n g m e a s u r e s t o r e d u ce l o n g - t e r m o p e r a t i o n a l C O , N O X , R O G , a n d P M 10 em i s s i o n s : ( 5. 2 - 5 ) • Tr a f f i c l a n e i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d s i gn a l i z a t i o n a s o u t l i n e d i n t h e Re v i s e d Pl a t i n u m T r i a n g l e Ex p a n s i o n P r o j e c t D r a f t T r a f f i c S t u d y R e po r t , P a r s o n s B r i n c k e r h o f f , A u g u s t 2 0 1 0 tr a f f i c s t u d y a n d Ma s t e r P l a n o f A r t e r i a l H i g h w a y s (M P A H ) s h a l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d a s re q u i r e d b y t h e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r . • Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l p l a c e b u s be n c h e s a n d / o r s h e l t e r s a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e Tr a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a ge r a t l o c a t i o n s a l o n g a n y s i t e f r o n t a g e r o u t e s a s n e e d e d . 2- 6 Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , t h e p r op e r t y o w n e r / a r c h i t e c t s h a l l s u b m i t e n e r g y ca l c u l a t i o n s u s e d t o d e m o n s t r a t e c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e p e r f o r m a n c e a p p r o a c h t o t h e Ca l i f o r n i a E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y S t a n d a r d s t o t h e B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t t h a t s h o w s e a c h n e w st r u c t u r e e x c e e d s t h e a p p l i c a b le B u i l d i n g a n d E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y S t a n d a r d s b y a m i n i m u m of 1 0 p e r c e n t a t t h e t i m e o f t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t . Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , p l a n s sh a l l s h o w t h e f o l l o w i n g : Significant and unavoidable 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 7 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation a) E n e r g y - e f f i c i e n t r o o f i n g s y s t e m s , s u c h a s ve g e t a t e d o r “ c o o l ” r o o f s, t h a t r e d u c e r o o f te m p e r a t u r e s s i g n i f i c a n t l y d u ri n g t h e s u m m e r a n d ; t h e r ef o r e , r e d u c e t h e e n e r g y re q u i r e m e n t f o r a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g . E x a m p l e s of e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s a n d su p p l i e r s c a n b e f o u n d a t t h e f o l l o w i ng w e b s i t e : h t t p : / / e e t d . l b l . g o v / Co o l R o o f s / o r ot h e r s i m i l a r w e b s i t e s . b) C o o l p a v e m e n t m a te r i a l s s u c h a s l i g h t e r - c o l o r e d p a v e m e n t m a t e r i a l s , p o r o u s ma t e r i a l s , o r p e r m e a b l e o r p o r o u s p a v e me n t , f o r a l l r o a d w a y s a n d w a l k w a y s n o t wi t h i n t h e p u b l i c r i g h t - o f - w a y , t o m i n i mi z e t h e a b s o r p t i o n o f s o l a r h e a t a n d su b s e q u e n t t r a n s f e r o f h e a t t o i t s s u r r o un d i n g e n v i r o n m e n t . E x a m p l e s o f c o o l pa v e m e n t m a t e r i a l s a r e a v a i l a b l e at : h t t p : / / w w w . e p a . g o v / h e a t i s l d / im a g e s / e x t r a / l e v e l 3 _ p a v i n g p r o d u c t s . h tm l o r o t h e r s i m i l a r w e b s i t e s . c) E n e r g y s a v i n g d e v i c e s t h a t a c h i e v e t h e ex i s t i n g 2 0 0 8 B u i l d i n g a n d E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y St a n d a r d s , s u c h a s u s e o f e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t a p p l i a n c e s ( e . g . , E n e r g y S t a r ® a p p l i a n c e s ) an d u s e o f s u n l i g h t - f i l t e r i n g w i n d o w c o a t i n g s o r d o u b l e - p a n e d w i n d o w s . d) E l e c t r i c a l v e h i c l e ch a r g i n g s t a t i o n s f o r a l l c o m m e r c i a l s t r u c t u r e s e n c o m p a s s i n g o v e r 50 , 0 0 0 s q u a r e - f e e t . e) S h a d y t r e e s s t r a t e g i c a l l y l o c a t e d w i t h i n cl o s e p r o x i m i t y t o t h e bu i l d i n g s t r u c t u r e t o re d u c e h e a t l o a d a n d r e s u l t i n g e n e r g y u s a g e a t r e s i d e n t i a l , c o m m e r c i a l , a n d o f f i c e bu i l d i n g s . Im p l e m en t a t i o n o f e n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n t e c h n i q u e s ( i . e . , i n s t a l l a t i o n o f e n e r g y s a v i n g de v i c e s , c o n s t r u c t i o n o f e l e c t r i c a l v e h i c l e c h a r g i n g s t a t i o n s , u s e o f s u n l i g h t f i l t e r i n g wi n d o w c o a t i n g s o r d o u b l e -pa n e d w i n d o w s , u t i l i z a t i o n o f l i g h t -co l o r e d r o o f i n g m a t e r i a l s as o p p o s e d t o d a r k -co l o r e d r o o f i n g m a t e r i a l s , a n d p l ac e m e n t o f s h a d y t r e e s n e x t t o ha b i t a b l e s t r u c t u r e s ) s h a l l b e i n d i c a t e d o n p l a n s . ( 5. 2 - 6 ) Th e f o l l o w i n g M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e f r o m t h e 2 0 0 5 E I R fo r t h e A d o p t e d M L U P i s no l o n g e r a p p l i c a b l e be c a u s e S C A Q M D a d o p t e d R u l e 4 4 5 , W o o d - B u r n i n g De v i c e s . S C A Q M D R u l e 4 4 5 p r o h i b i t s i n s t a l l a t i o n of w o o d - b u r n i n g f i r e p l a c e s . C o n s e q u e n t l y , a l l f i r e p l ac e s i n s t a l l e d w i t h i n t h e Pl a t i n u m T r i a n g l e M L U P wo u l d b e r e q u i r e d t o b e g a s - b u r n in g a n d f o r m e r M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e 5 . 2 - 7 i s n o l o n g e r r e q u i r e d . 5. 2 -7 Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e pl a c e m e n t o f a n o t e o n t h e p l a n s st a t i n g t h a t t o r e d u c e t h e h e a l t h i m p a c t s o f a i r q u a l i t y h a z a r d s wi t h i n T h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e , p l a c e m e nt o f w o o d -bu r n i n g f i r e p l a c e s i n r e s i d e n t i a l u n i t s s h a l l b e pr o h i b i t e d . A s a n a l t e r n a t i v e t o w o o d -bu r n i n g f i r e p l a c e s , g a s f i r e p l a c e s m a y b e u s e d . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n No a d d i t i o n a l m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e a v a i l a b l e . 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 8 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 5. 2 - 3 : C o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s wo u l d p o t e n t i a l l y e x p o s e s e n s i t i v e re c e p t o r s t o s u b s t a n t i a l p o l l u t a n t co n c e n t r a t i o n s o f N O X , C O , P M 10 , an d P M 2.5 . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M e a s u r e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s 2 - 1 t h r o u g h 2 - 4 w o u l d a l s o r e d u c e l o c a l i z e d c o n c e n t r a t i o n o f a i r p o l l u t a n t s d u r i n g co n s t r u c t i o n . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n No a d d i t i o n a l m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e a v a i l a b l e . Significant and unavoidable 5. 2 - 4 : M o b i l e s o u r c e s o f em i s s i o n s r e l a t e d t o t h e P r o p o s e d Pr o j e c t w o u l d n o t e x p o s e s e n s i t i v e re c e p t o r s i n t h e v i c i n i t y o f t h e pr o j e c t t o s u b s t a n t i a l p o l l u t a n t co n c e n t r a t i o n s . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t N o m i t i g a t i o n m e as u r e s a r e n e c e s s a r y . N o t a p p l i c a b l e 5. 2 - 5 : S e n s i t i v e l a n d u s e s w i t h i n 50 0 f e e t o f S t a t e R o u t e 5 7 a n d In t e r s t a t e 5 o r w i t h i n t h e re c o m m e n d e d b u f f e r d i s t a n c e s t o fa c i l i t i e s e m i t t i n g T A C s m a y b e ex p o s e d t o s u b s t a n t i a l p o l l u t a n t co n c e n t r a t i o n s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M e a s u r e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A No m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e a p p l i c a b l e . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 2- 7 A p p l i c a n t s f o r n e w r e s i d e n t i a l d e v e l o p m e n t s i n t h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e M a s t e r L a n d U s e P l a n wi t h i n 5 0 0 f e e t o f I n t e r s t a t e 5 ( I - 5 ) o r S t a t e R o ut e 5 7 ( S R - 5 7 ) s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d t o i n s t a l l h i g h ef f i c i e n c y M i n i m u m E f f i c i e n c y Re p o r t i n g V a l u e ( M E R V ) f i l t e r s of M E R V 1 4 o r b e t t e r i n t h e in t a k e o f r e s i d e n t i a l v e n t i l a t i o n s y s t e m s . M E R V 1 4 f i l t e r s h a v e a P a r t i c l e S i z e E f f i c i e n c y r a t i n g of 9 0 p e r c e n t f o r p a r t i c u l a t e s 1 . 0 m i c r o n t o 3 . 0 mi c r o n s i n s i z e a n d a P a r t i c l e S i z e E f f i c i e n c y ra t i n g o f 7 5 t o 8 5 p e r c e n t f o r p a r t i c l e s 0 . 3 t o 1 . 0 m i c r o n i n s i z e . A M E R V 1 4 f i l t e r c r e a t e s m o r e re s i s t a n c e t o a i r f l o w b e c a u s e t h e f i l t e r m e d i a b e co m e s d e n s e r a s e f f i c i e n c y i n c r e a s e s . H e a t i n g , ai r c o n d i t i o n i n g , a n d v e n t i l a t i o n s y s t e m s s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d w i t h a f a n u n i t d e s i g n e d t o f o r c e a i r th r o u g h t h e M E R V 1 4 f i l t e r . T o e n s u r e l o n g - t er m m a i n t e n a n c e a n d r e p l a c e m e n t o f t h e M E R V 14 f i l t e r s i n t h e i n d i v i d u a l u n i t s , t h e f o l l o w i n g s h a l l o c c u r : a) D e v e l o p e r , s a l e , a n d / o r r e n t a l r e p r e s e n t a t i ve s h a l l p r o v i d e n o t i f i c a t i o n t o a l l a f f e c t e d te n a n t s / r e s i d e n t s o f t h e p o t e n t i a l h e a l t h r i s k f r o m I - 5 / S R - 5 7 f o r a l l a f f e c t e d u n i t s . b) F o r r e n t a l u n i t s w i t h i n 5 0 0 f e e t o f t h e I- 5 / S R - 5 7 , t h e o w n e r / p r o p e r t y m a n a g e r s h a l l ma i n t a i n a n d r e p l a c e M E R V 1 4 f i l t e r s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r ’ s re c o m m e n d a t i o n s . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l i n f o r m r e n t e r s o f i n c r e a s e d r i s k o f ex p o s u r e t o d i e s e l p a r t i c u l a t e s f r o m I - 5 o r S R - 5 7 w h e n w i n d o w s a r e o p e n . c) F o r r e s i d e n t i a l o w n e d u n i t s w i t h i n 5 0 0 f e e t o f I - 5 / S R - 5 7 , t h e h o m e o w n e r ’ s a s s o c i a t i o n (H O A ) s h a l l i n c o r p o r a t e r e q u i r e m e n t s f o r lo n g - t e r m m a i n t e n a n c e i n t h e C o v e n a n t , Co n d i t i o n s , a n d R e s t r i c t i o n s a n d i n f o r m h o m e ow n e r s o f t h e i r r e s p o n s i b i l i t y t o m a i n t a i n th e M E R V 1 4 f i l t e r i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e m a n u f a c t u r e r ’ s r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s . T h e H O A sh a l l i n f o r m h o m e o w n e r s o f i n c r e a s e d r i s k o f e x p o s u r e t o d i e s e l p a r t i c u l a t e s f r o m I - 5/ S R - 5 7 w h e n w i n d o w s a r e o p e n . Significant and unavoidable 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 9 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 2- 8 B a s e d o n t h e r e c o m m e n d e d b u f f e r d i s t a n c e s o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a A i r R e s o u r c e s B o a r d , a p p l i c a n t s fo r n e w d e v e l o p m e n t s i n t h e P l a t in u m T r i a n g l e s h a l l p l a c e r e s i d e n t i a l s t r u c t u r e s a n d a c t i v e ou t d o o r r e c r e a t i o n a l a r e a s o u t s i d e o f t h e r e co m m e n d e d b u f f e r d i s t a n c e s t o t h e f o l l o w i n g st a t i o n a r y a i r p o l l u t a n t s o u r c e s : • 1, 0 0 0 f e e t f r o m t h e t r u c k b a y s w i t h a n e x i s ti n g d i s t r i b u t i o n c e n t e r t h a t a c c o m m o d a t e s mo r e t h a n 1 0 0 t r u c k s p e r d a y , m o r e t h a n 4 0 t r uc k s w i t h o p e r a t i n g t r a n s p o r t r e f r i g e r a t i o n un i t s , o r w h e r e t r a n s p o r t r e f r i g e r a t i o n u n i t o p e r a t i o n s e x c e e d 3 0 0 h o u r s p e r w e e k . • 1, 0 0 0 f e e t f r o m a n e x i s t i n g c h r o m e p l a t i n g f a c i l i t y . • 30 0 f e e t f r o m a d r y - c l e a n i n g f a c i l i t y u s i n g pe r c h l o r o e t h y l e n e u s i n g o n e m a c h i n e a n d 5 0 0 fe e t f r o m d r y - c l e a n i n g f a c i l i t y u s i n g pe r c h l o r o e t h y l e n e u s i n g t w o m a c h i n e s . • 50 f e e t f r o m g a s p u m p s w i t h i n a g a s - d i s p e n si n g f a c i l i t y a n d 3 0 0 f e e t f r o m g a s p u m p s wi t h i n a g a s o l i n e - d i s p e n s i n g f a c i li t y w i t h a t h r o u g h p u t o f 3 . 6 m i l l i o n g a l l o n s p e r y e a r o r gr e a t e r . 2- 9 A l l o u t d o o r a c t i v e - u s e p u b l i c r e c r e a t i o n a l a r e a s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t s s h a l l b e lo c a t e d m o r e t h a n 5 0 0 f e e t f r o m t h e n e a r e s t l a n e of t r a f f i c o n I n t e r s t a t e 5 a n d S t a t e R o u t e 5 7 . 5. 2 - 6 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t i s co n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e 2 0 0 7 A Q M P . Le s s T h a n S i g n i f i c a n t No m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e n e c e s s a r y . Not Applicable 5. 2 - 7 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d n o t c r e a t e o b j e c t i o n a b l e od o r s ; h o w e v e r , i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f th e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t c o u l d r e s u l t in n e w r e s i d e n t i a l l a n d u s e s lo c a t e d n e a r e x i s t i n g o d o r ge n e r a t o r s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M e a s u r e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A No m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e a p p l i c a b l e . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 2- 1 0 F o r p r o j e c t s l o c a t e d w i t h i n 1 , 0 0 0 f e e t o f a n in d u s t r i a l f a c i l i t y t h a t e m i t s s u b s t a n t i a l o d o r s , wh i c h i n c l u d e s b u t i s n o t l i m i t e d t o : • wa s t e w a t e r t r e a t m e n t p l a n t s • co m p o s t i n g , g r e e n w a s t e , o r r e c y c l i n g f a c i l i t i e s • fi b e r g l a s s m a n u f a c t u r i n g f a c i l i t i e s • pa i n t i n g / c o a t i n g o p e r a t i o n s • co f f e e r o a s t e r s • fo o d p r o c e s s i n g f a c i l i t i e s Pr o j e c t A p p l i c a n t s h a l l s u b m i t a n o d o r a s s e s s m e n t to t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r p r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f an y f u t u r e d i s c r e t i o n a r y a c t i o n t h a t v e r i f i e s t h a t t h e S o u t h C o a s t A i r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e n t Di s t r i c t ( S C A Q M D ) h a s n o t r e c e i v e d t h r e e o r mo r e v e r i f i e d o d o r c o m p l a i n t s . I f t h e O d o r As s e s s m e n t i d e n t i f i e s t h a t t h e f a c i l i t y h a s r e c e i v ed t h r e e s u c h c o m p l a i n t s , t h e a p p l i c a n t w i l l b e re q u i r e d t o i d e n t i f y a n d d e m o n s tr a t e t h a t B e s t A v a i l a b l e C o n t r o l T e c h n o l o g i e s f o r T o x i c s ( T - Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 0 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation BA C T s ) a r e c a p a b l e o f r e d u c i n g p o t e n t i a l o d o r s to a n a c c e p t a b l e l e v e l , in c l u d i n g a p p r o p r i a t e en f o r c e m e n t m e c h a n i s m s . T - B A C T s m a y i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o , s c r u b b e r s a t t h e in d u s t r i a l f a c i l i t y , o r i n s t a l l a t i o n o f M i n i m u m E ff i c i e n c y R e p o r t i n g V a l u e ( M E R V ) f i l t e r s r a t e d a t 14 o r b e t t e r a t a l l r e s i d e n t i a l u n i t s . 5. 3 H Y D R O L O G Y A N D W A T E R Q U A L I T Y 5. 3 - 1 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d p l a c e a d d i t i o n a l d e m a n d s on g r o u n d w a t e r s u p p l i e s d u e t o th e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n e w w a t e r we l l . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 3- 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g p e r m i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p l a n s do c u m e n t i n g t h a t t h e d e s i g n o f a l l a b o v e g r o u n d s t r u c t u r e s ( w i t h t h e e x c e p t i o n o f p a r k i n g st r u c t u r e s ) s h a l l b e a t l e a s t t h r e e f e e t h i g h e r t h a t t h e 1 0 0 - y e a r f l o o d z o n e , w h e r e a p p l i c a b l e , un l e s s o t h e r w i s e r e q u i r e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r . A l l s t r u c t u r e s b e l o w t h i s l e v e l s h a l l b e fl o o d p r o o f e d t o p r e v e n t d a m a g e t o pr o p e r t y o r h a r m t o p e o p l e . ( 5. 5 - 1 ) 3- 2 Pr i o r t o t h e i n i t i a t i o n o f g r a d in g a c t i v i t i e s , f o r p r o j e c t s g r e a te r t h a n o n e a c r e , c o v e r a g e f o r th e p r o j e c t m u s t b e o b t a i n e d b y e l e c t r o n i c a l l y s u b m i t t i n g p e r m i t r e g i s t r a t i o n d o c u m e n t s t o th e S t a t e o r o b t a i n i n g c o v e r a g e v i a c u r r e n t g e ne r a l c o n s t r u c t i o n p e r m i t p r e s c r i b e d m e t h o d by t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o pe r p u r s u a n t t o S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l N a t i o n a l P o l l u t i o n Di s c h a r g e E l i m i n a t i o n S y s t e m ( N P D E S ) r e q u i r e m en t s . A s p a r t o f t h e NO I , a S u r f a c e W a t e r Po l l u t i o n P r e v e n t i o n P l a n ( S W P P P ) s h a l l b e pr e p a r e d . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l al s o p r e p a r e a n d s u b m i t t o t h e D e v e l o p m e n t S e r v i c e s D i v i s i o n o f t h e P u b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t , a W a t e r Q u a l i t y M a n a g e m e n t P l a n ( W Q M P ) i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e C i t y ’ s mu n i c i p a l N P D E S r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d C h a p t e r 7 o f t h e O r a n g e C o u n ty D r a i n a g e A r e a Ma n a g e m e n t P l a n . T h e W Q M P m u s t b e a p p r o v e d p r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f g r a d i n g p e r m i t . T h e SW P P P , i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e W Q M P , w i l l d e sc r i b e t h e s t r u c t u r a l a n d n o n s t r u c t u r a l BM P s t h a t w i l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d d u ri n g c o n s t r u c t i o n ( s h o r t - t e r m ) w i t h i n t h e P r o j e c t A r e a a s we l l a s B M P s f o r l o n g - t e r m o p e r at i o n o f t h e P r o j e c t A r e a t h a t a d d r e s s p o t e n t i a l i m p a c t s t o su r f a c e w a t e r s . ( 5 . 5 - 2 ) A t l e a s t 9 0 d a y s p r i o r t o t h e i n i ti a t i o n o f g r a d i n g a c t i v i t i e s , f o r p r o j e c t s gr e a t e r t h a n o n e a c r e , a n N O I s h a l l b e f i l e d wi t h t h e R e g i o n a l W a t e r Q u a l i t y C o n t r o l B o a r d (R W Q C B ) b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r p u r s u a nt t o S t a t e a n d F e d e r a l N a t i o n a l P o l l u t i o n Di s c h a r g e E l i m i n a t i o n S y s t e m ( N P DE S ) r e q u i r e m e n t s . A s p a r t of t h e N O I , a S u r f a c e W a t e r Po l l u t i o n P r e v e n t i o n P l a n ( S W P P P ) s h a l l b e p r e p ar e d . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l a l s o Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 1 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation pr e p a r e a n d s u b m i t t o R W Q C B , a W a t e r Q u a l i t y Ma n a g e m e n t P l a n ( W Q M P ) i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h th e C i t y ’ s m u n i c i p a l NP D E S r e q u i r e m e n t s a n d t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y D r a i n a g e A r e a M a n a g e m e n t Pla n . T h e S W P P P , i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e W Q M P , w i l l d e s c r i b e t h e s t r u c t u r a l a n d n o n s t r u c t u r a l BM P s t h a t w i l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n ( s h o r t -te r m ) w i t h i n t h e P r o j e c t A r e a a s w e l l a s B M P s f o r l o n g -te r m op e r a t i o n o f t h e P r o j e c t A r e a . L o n g -te r m m e a s u r e s c o u l d i n c l u d e , b u t ma y n o t b e l i m i t e d t o , s t r e e t s w e e p i n g , t r a s h c o l l e c t i o n , p r o p e r m a te r i a l s s t o r a g e , d e s i g n a t e d wa s h a r e a s c o n n e c t e d t o s a n i t a r y s e w e r s , f i l t e r a n d g r e a s e t r a p s , a n d c la r i f i e r s f o r s u r f a c e pa r k i n g a r e a s . Th e B M P s s e l e c t e d s h a l l b e c o n s i s t e n t wi t h t h e W a t e r Q u a l i t y T e c h n i c a l R e p o r t se t f o r t h i n f o r t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t ( A p p e n d i x G ) o f S E I R N o . 3 3 2 . ( 5. 5 -2 ) Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s No a d d i t i o n a l m i t i g a t i o n me a s u r e s a r e r e q u i r e d . 5. 4 L A N D U S E A N D P L A N N I N G 5. 4 - 1 : P r o j e c t I m p l e m e n t a t i o n wo u l d c o n f l i c t w i t h a p p l i c a b l e pl a n s , p o l i c i e s , a n d / o r r e g u l a t i o n . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t N o s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i ed a n d n o m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e r e q u i r e d . N o t A p p l i c a b l e 5. 4 - 2 : S o m e d e v e l o p m e n t pu r s u a n t t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wi l l n o t b e c o m p a t i b l e w i t h t h e So u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a G a s Co m p a n y ’ s e x i s t i n g m i c r o w a v e to w e r . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t N o f e a s i b l e m i t i g a ti o n m e a s u r e s a r e a v a i l a b l e t o m i t i g a t e t h e p o t e n t i a l c o n f l i c t w i t h t h e m i c r o w a v e to w e r ’ s t e l e c o m m u n i c a t i o n f u n c t i o n a n ti c i p a t e d b y t h e h i g h - r i s e t o w e r s . Significant and unavoidable 5. 5 N O I S E 5. 5 - 1 : B u i l d - o u t o f t h e P r o p o s e d Pr o j e c t w o u l d r e s u l t i n a su b s t a n t i a l , p e r m a n e n t i n c r e a s e i n am b i e n t t r a f f i c n o i s e l e v e l s w i t h i n th e v i c i n i t y o f e x i s t i n g n o i s e - se n s i t i v e r e c e p t o r s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A No e x i s t i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s m e a s u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a p p l y . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 5- 1 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f s t r e e t im p r o v e m e n t p l a n s f o r a n y p r o j e c t - r e l a t e d r o a d w a y w i d e n i n g , t h e Ci t y s h a l l r e t a i n a q u a l i f i e d a c o u s t ic e n g i n e e r t o d e s i g n p r o j e c t a c ou s t i c a l f e a t u r e s t h a t w i l l l i m i t tr a f f i c n o i s e a t n o i s e s e n s i t i v e u s e s t o l e v e l s th a t a r e b e l o w t h e C i t y ’ s n o i s e o r d i n a n c e . T h e s e tr e a t m e n t s s h a l l b e n o t e d o n t h e s t r e e t i m p r o v e m en t p l a n s t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g De p a r t m e n t a n d m a y i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o , t h e r e p l a c e m e n t o f w i n d o w s a n d d o o r s a t ex i s t i n g r e s i d e n c e s w i t h a c o u s t ic a l l y r a t e d w i n d o w s a n d d o o r s . S ignificant and unavoidable. Mitigation Measure 5-1 will reduce impacts related traffic noise increases to the extent feasible. However, some areas may experience noise levels in exceedance of the City’s noise ordinance prior to implementation of roadway improvements and associated noise attenuation. Consequently, Impact 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 2 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 5.5-1 would remain significant and unavoidable. 5. 5 - 2 : B u i l d - o u t o f t h e P l a t i n u m Tr i a n g l e w o u l d n o t g e n e r a t e si g n i f i c a n t l e v e l s o f s t a t i o n a r y - so u r c e n o i s e t h a t e x c e e d s t h e C i t y of A n a h e i m ’ s n o i s e s t a n d a r d s fr o m t r u c k l o a d i n g / u n l o a d i n g ac t i v i t i e s a n d o p e r a t i o n o f H V A C sy s t e m s . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t N o s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i ed a n d n o m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e r e q u i r e d . N o t A p p l i c a b l e 5. 5 - 3 : N o i s e - s e n s i t i v e r e s i d e n t i a l un i t s p r o p o s e d w i t h i n t h e P l a t i n u m Tr i a n g l e m a y b e e x p o s e d t o mo b i l e - a n d s t a t i o n a r y - s o u r c e no i s e l e v e l s t h a t e x c e e d s t a t e an d / o r C i t y s t a n d a r d s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e w a s i n c l u d e d i n th e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S E I R N o . 3 3 2 a n d i s a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . A d d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d de l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e n u m b e r s a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 5- 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r an y p r o j e c t g e n e r a t i n g o v e r 1 0 0 p e a k h o u r t r i p s , the pr o j e c t p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s s h a l l s u b m i t a f i n a l a c o u s t i c a l r e p o r t p r e p a r e d t o t h e sa t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r . T h e r e p o r t s h a l l s h o w t h a t t h e d e v e l o p m e n t w i l l b e s o u n d - at t e n u a t e d a g a i n s t p r e s e n t a n d p r oj e c t e d n o i s e l e v e l s , i n c l u d i n g r o a d w a y , a i r c r a f t , h e l i c o p t e r , st a t i o n a r y s o u r c e s ( e . g . , i n d u s t r i a l , c o m m e r c i a l , s t a d i u m , e t c . ) , a n d r a i l r o a d , t o m e e t C i t y in t e r i o r a n d e x t e r i o r n o i s e s t a n d a r d s as f o l l o w s : ( 5. 7 . 2 ) a) T h e r e p o r t s h a l l d e m o n s t r at e t h a t t h e p r o p o s e d r e s i d e nt i a l d e s i g n w i l l r e s u l t i n co m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e 4 5 d B A C N E L i n t e r i o r n o i s e l e v e l s , a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e Ca l i f o r n i a B u i l d i n g C o d e a n d C a l i f o r n i a N o i s e I n s u l a t i o n S t a n d a r d s ( T i t l e 2 4 a n d 2 5 of t h e C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f R e g u l a t i o n s ) . b) T h e r e p o r t s h a l l d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t t h e Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t r e s i de n t i a l d e s i g n s h a l l mi n i m i z e n i g h t t i m e a w a k e n i n g f r o m s t a d i u m e v e n t n o i s e a n d t r a i n h o r n s s u c h t h a t in t e r i o r s i n g l e - e v e n t n o i s e l e v e l s a r e b e l o w 8 1 d B A L ma x . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t t h e n o i s e m i t i g a t i o n r e p o r t t o t h e P l a n n i n g Di r e c t o r f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l . U p o n a p p r o v a l b y t h e C i t y , t h e p r o j e c t a c o u s t i c a l d e s i g n fe a t u r e s s h a l l b e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 5- 3 P r i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n sp e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t ev i d e n c e t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r t h a t o c c u p a n c y d i s c l o s u r e n o t i c e s re g a r d i n g p o t e n t i a l f o r e x t e r i o r n o i s e l e v e l s t o b e e l e v a t e d d u r i n g a s t a d i u m e v e n t w i l l b e Significant and unavoidable 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 3 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation pr o v i d e d t o a l l f u t u r e t e n a n t s i n t h e S t a d i u m D i s t r i c t . 5- 4 P r i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n sp e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t ev i d e n c e t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r t h a t o c c u p a n c y d i s c l o s u r e n o t i c e s re g a r d i n g p o t e n t i a l f o r e x t e r i o r n o i s e l e v e l s t o b e e l e v a t e d d u r i n g s o u n d i n g o f t r a i n h o r n s w i l l b e pr o v i d e d t o a l l f u t u r e t e n a n t s f a c i n g a n a t -g r a d e c r o s s i n g o f t h e O r a n g e C o u n t L i n e . 5. 5 - 4 : B u i l d i n g f a ç a d e s t h a t a r e ex p o s e d t o n o i s e l e v e l s t h a t ex c e e d 6 9 d B A w o u l d r e q u i r e ar c h i t e c t u r a l i m p r o v e m e n t s t o ac h i e v e t h e r e q u i r e d 4 5 d B A C N E L in t e r i o r n o i s e l e v e l l i m i t s . Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t Sa m e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a s I m p a c t 5 . 5 - 3 . Less than significant 5. 5 - 5 : C o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t w o u l d g e n e r a t e su b s t a n t i a l l e v e l s o f g r o u n d b o r n e vi b r a t i o n a n d g r o u n d b o r n e n o i s e i n th e v i c i n i t y o f v i b r a t i o n - s e n s i t i v e la n d u s e s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A No e x i s t i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s m e a s u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a p p l y . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 5- 5 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t o r e d u c e n o i s e a n d v i b r a t i o n i m p a c t s f r o m t h e im p a c t p i l e d r i v e r , t h e c o n s t r u c t i on c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l e v a l u a t e t h e fe a s i b i l i t y o f u s i n g a u g e r c a s t pi l e s o r a s i m i l a r s y s t e m t o d r i l l h o l e s t o c o n s t r u c t c a s t - i n - p l a c e p i l e s f o r a p i l e - s u p p o r t e d tr a n s f e r s l a b f o u n d a t i o n s y s t e m . T h i s a l t e r n a t i v e c o n s t r u c t i o n m e t h o d w o u l d r e d u c e t h e du r a t i o n n e c e s s a r y f o r u s e o f t h e i m p a c t p i l e d r i v er a n d / o r e l i m i n a t e t h e n ee d t o u s e p i l e d r i v e r s al t o g e t h e r . P r o o f o f c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h i s m e a s u r e s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e P l a n n i n g De p a r t m e n t i n t h e f o r m o f a l e t t e r fr o m t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n c o n t r a c t o r . Significant and unavoidable 5. 5 - 6 : I m p l e m e n ta t i o n o f t h e Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t c o u l d e x p o s e vi b r a t i o n - s e n s i t i v e r e c e p t o r s t o su b s t a n t i a l l e v e l s o f g r o u n d b o r n e vi b r a t i o n a n d g r o u n d b o r n e n o i s e i n th e v i c i n i t y o f t h e AM T R A K / M e t r o l i n k l i n e . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A No e x i s t i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s m e a s u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a p p l y . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 5- 6 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a n y F i n a l S i t e P l a n , i f n e w v i b r a t i o n - s e n s i t i v e l a n d us e s a r e l o c a t e d i n c l o s e pr o x i m i t y t o t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y L i n e , t h e p r o j e c t a p pli c a n t s h a l l r e t a i n a n ac o u s t i c a l e n g i n e e r t o co n d u c t a n a c o u s t i c a n a l y s i s t h at i n c l u d e s a v i b r a t i o n a n a l y s i s f o r p o t e n t i a l i m p a c t s f r o m vi b r a t i o n g e n e r a t e d b y o p e r a t i o n o f t h e r a i l l i n e . If p e r c e p t i b l e l e v e l s o f v i b r a t i o n a r e d e t e c t e d , th e a c o u s t i c a n a l y s i s s h a l l r e c o m m e n d s i t e d e s i gn f e a t u r e s , s u c h a s se t b a c k s a n d t r e n c h e s , an d / o r r e q u i r e d b u i l d i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s , s u c h a s ha r d e r b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s ( e . g . , s t e e l f r a m i n g vs . w o o d f r a m i n g ) , t o e l i m i n a t e t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r t r ai n o p e r a t i o n s t o r e s u l t i n p e r c e p t i b l e l e v e l s of v i b r a t i o n t h a t c a u s e h u m a n a n n o y a n c e t o f u t u r e p r o j e c t r e s i d e n t s . T h e s i t e d e s i g n f e a t u r e s sh a l l b e i d e n t i f i e d o n t h e F i n a l S i t e P l a n t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r . Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 4 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 5. 5 - 7 : D e v e l o p m e n t w i t h i n t h e Pla t i n u m T r i a n g l e c o u l d r e s u l t i n a su b s t a n t i a l t e m p o r a r y i n c r e a s e i n no i s e l e v e l s i n t h e v i c i n i t y o f ex i s t i n g n o i s e - s e n s i t i v e l a n d u s e s du r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A 5- 7 O n g o i n g d u r i n g g r a d i n g , d e m o li t i o n , a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n , t h e p r o p er t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e re s p o n s i b l e f o r r e q u i r i n g c o n t r a c t o r s t o i m pl e m e n t t h e f o l l o w i n g me a s u r e s t o l i m i t co n s t r u c t i o n - r e l a t e d n o i s e : ( 5. 7 - 1 ) a) No i s e g e n e r a t e d b y c o n s t r u c t i o n , s h a l l b e l i mi t e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o 60 d B A a l o n g t h e p r o p e r t y b o u n d a r i e s , be f o r e 7 : 0 0 A M a n d a f t e r 7 : 0 0 P M , a s go v e r n e d b y C h a p t e r 6 . 7 , S o u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l s , o f t h e A n a h e i m M u n i c i p a l C o d e . b) Li m i t t h e h o u r s o f o p e r a t i o n o f e q u i p m e n t t h a t p r o d u c e s n o i s e l e v e l s n o t i c e a b l y a b o v e ge n e r a l c o n s t r u c t i o n n o i s e l e v e l s t o t h e h o u r s o f 1 0 : 0 0 A M t o 4 : 0 0 P M . c) A l l i n t e r n a l c o m b u s t i o n e n g i n e s o n a l l o f th e c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m en t s h a l l b e p r o p e r l y ou t f i t t e d w i t h w e l l m a i n t a i n e d m u f f l e r s y s t e m s . Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 5- 8 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r op e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r re q u i r i n g p r o j e c t c o n t r a c t o r s t o p r o p e r l y m a i n ta i n a n d t u n e a l l c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m e n t t o mi n i m i z e n o i s e e m i s s i o n s . 5- 9 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r op e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r re q u i r i n g p r o j e c t c o n t r a c t o r s t o l o c a t e a l l s t a t i o n a r y n o i s e s o u r c e s ( e . g . , g e n e r a t o r s , co m p r e s s o r s , s t a g i n g a r e a s ) a s f a r f r o m o c c u p i e d n o i s e - s e n s i t i v e r e c e p t o r s a s i s f e a s i b l e . 5- 1 0 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s , m a t e r i a l d e l i v e r y , s o i l h a u l t r u c k s , a n d e q u i p m e n t se r v i c i n g s h a l l a l s o b e r e s t r i c t e d t o t h e h o u r s s e t f o r t h i n t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m M u n i c i p a l C o d e , Se c t i o n 6 . 7 0 . Significant and unavoidable 5. 5 - 8 : H e l i p o r t s / h e l i p a d s w i t h i n an d s u r r o u n d i n g t h e P l a t i n u m Tr i a n g l e w o u l d n o t s i g n i f i c a n t l y ex p o s e f u t u r e r e s i d e n t s a n d / o r wo r k e r s t o s u b s t a n t i a l l e v e l s o f ai r p o r t - r e l a t e d n o i s e . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t N o s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i ed a n d n o m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s ar e r e q u i r e d . N o t A p p l i c a b l e 5. 6 P O P U L A T I O N A N D H O U S I N G 5. 6 - 1 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d r e s u l t i n d i r e c t p o p u l a t i o n gr o w t h d u e t o n e w h o u s i n g a n d em p l o y m e n t o p p o r t u n i t i e s i n t h e Pr o j e c t A r e a . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t N o s i g n i f i c a n t i m pa c t s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d a n d n o m i t i ga t i o n i s r e q u i r e d . N o t A p p l i c a b l e 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 5 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 5. 7 P U B L I C S E R V I C E S FI R E P R O T E C T I O N A N D E M E R G E N C Y S E R V I C E S 5. 7 - 1 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d r e q u i r e a d d i t i o n a l f i r e fa c i l i t i e s t o s e r v e p r o j e c t de v e l o p m e n t . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 7- 1 Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a Bu i l d i n g P e r m i t , p l a n s Pla n s s h a l l i n d i c a t e t h a t a l l b u i l d i n g s s h a l l h a v e fi r e s p r i n k l e r s i n s t a l l e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e A n a h e i m Mu n i c i p a l C o d e . S a i d s p r i n k l e r s s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d by t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r p r i o r t o ea c h f i n a l B u i l d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n . ( 5. 9 - 1 ) Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 7- 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a B u i l d i n g P e r m i t , t h e p r op e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e P u b l i c S a f e t y Im p a c t F e e , a s a m e n d e d f r o m t i m e t o t i m e , f o r f i r e f a c i l i t i e s a n d e q u i p m e n t i m p a c t f e e s id e n t i f i e d i n A n a h e i m M u n i ci p a l C o d e C h a p t e r 1 7 . 3 6 . Less than significant PO L I C E P R O T E C T I O N 5. 7 - 2 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d r e q u i r e a n i n c r e a s e i n p o l i c e fa c i l i t i e s a n d s t a f f i n g n e e d s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 7- 3 Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f a F i n a l S i t e P l a n , th e T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s t o t h e A n a h e i m P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f in c o r p o r a t i n g s a f e t y m e a s u r e s i n t h e p r o j e c t d e s i g n i n c l u d i n g im p l e m e n t a t i o n o f O r d i n a n c e 60 1 6 a n d th e c o n c e p t o f c r i m e p r e v e n t i o n t h r o u g h e n vi r o n m e n t a l d e s i g n ( i . e . , b u i l d i n g d e s i g n , ci r c u l a t i o n , s i t e p l a n n i n g a n d l i g h t i n g o f p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e a n d p a r k i n g a r e a s ) . R o o f t o p ad d r e s s e s s h a l l b e p r o v i d e d f o r a l l p a r k i n g s t r u c t ur e s ( f o r t h e p o l i c e h e l i c o p t e r ) . M i n i m u m s i z e fo r n u m b e r s s h a l l b e f o u r f e e t i n h e i g h t a n d t w o f e e t i n w i d t h . T h e l i n e s f o r t h e n u m b e r s s h a l l be s i x i n c h e s t h i c k a n d s p a c e d 1 2 t o 1 8 i n c h e s a p a r t . A l l n u m b e r s s h a l l h a v e a c o n t r a s t i n g co l o r t o t h e p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e a n d s h a l l f a c e t h e s t r e e t t o w h i c h t h e s t r u c t u r e i s a d d r e s s e d . (5. 9 - 2 ) 7- 4 Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f ea c h B u i l d i n g P e r m i t f o r a p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e , t h e Th e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p l a n s t o t h e A n a h e i m P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l in d i c a t i n g t h e p r o v i s i o n o f c l o s e d c i r c u i t m o n i t o ri n g a n d r e c o r d i n g o r o t h e r s u b s t i t u t e s e c u r i t y Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 6 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation me a s u r e s a s m a y b e a p p r o v e d by t h e A n a h e i m P o l i c e D e p a r t m e nt . S a i d m e a s u r e s s h a l l b e im p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o f i n a l B u i l d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s . ( 5. 9 - 3 ) 7- 5 Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f a F i n a l S i t e P l a n , t h e Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t de s i g n p l a n s t h a t s h a l l i n c l u d e p a r k i n g l o t s a n d p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e s w i t h c o n t r o l l e d a c c e s s po i n t s t o l i m i t i n g r e s s a n d e g r e s s i f d e t e r m i n ed t o b e n e c e s s a r y b y t h e A n a h e i m P o l i c e De p a r t m e n t , a n d s h a l l b e s u b j e c t t o t h e r e vi e w a n d a p p r o v a l o f t h e A n a h e i m P o l i c e De p a r t m e n t . ( 5. 9 - 4 ) 7- 6 On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j ec t o p e r a t i o n , i f If t h e A n a h e i m P o l i c e D e p a r tm e n t o f A n a h e i m T r a f f i c Ma n a g e m e n t C e n t e r ( T M C ) p e r s o n n e l a r e r e q u ir e d t o p r o v i d e t e m p o r a r y t r a f f i c c o n t r o l se r v i c e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l r e im b u r s e t h e C i t y , o n a f a i r s h a r e b a s i s , i f ap p l i c a b l e , f o r r e a s o n a b l e c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s u c h s e r v i c e s . ( 5. 9 - 5 ) Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 7- 7 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e P u b l i c Sa f e t y I m p a c t F e e , a s a m e n d e d fr o m t i m e t o t i m e , f o r p o l i c e fa c i l i t i e s a n d e q u i p m e n t i m p a c t fe e s i d e n t i f i e d i n A n a h e i m Mu n i c i p a l C o d e C h a p t e r 1 7 . 3 6 . SC H O O L S E R V I C E S 5. 7 - 3 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d g e n e r a t e n e w s t u d e n t s a n d re q u i r e a d d i t i o n a l s c h o o l f a c i l i t i e s in t h e a r e a . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e as u r e f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e w a s i n c l u d e d i n th e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d i s a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 7- 8 On g o i n g , t h e Th e C i t y o f A n a h e i m w i l l w o r k c o o p e r a t i v e l y w i t h s c h o o l d i s t r i c t s t o i d e n t i f y op p o r t u n i t i e s f o r s c h o o l f a c i l i t i e s s i t e s f o r n e w s c h o o l s a n d s c h o o l e x p a n s i o n s i n t h e Pl a t i n u m T r i a n g l e . ( 5. 9 - 6 ) Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 7- 9 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e rm i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e sc h o o l i m p a c t f e e s a s a d o p t e d b y t h e B o a r d o f T r u s t e e s o f t h e A n a h e i m U n i o n H i g h S c h o o l Di s t r i c t a n d A n a h e i m C i t y S c h o o l D i s t r i c t i n co m p l i a n c e w i t h S e n a t e B i l l 5 0 ( G o v e r n m e n t C o d e [G C ] S e c t i o n 6 5 9 9 5 [ b ] [ 3 ] a s a m e n d e d ) . Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 7 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation LI B R A R Y S E R V I C E S 5. 7 - 4 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d i n c r e a s e t h e s e r v i c e n e e d s fo r l o c a l l i b r a r i e s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t 7 - 1 0 P r i o r t o a p p r ov a l o f t h e f i r s t D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t w i th r e s i d e n t i a l u n i t s w i t h i n t h e P l a t i n u m Tr i a n g l e f o l l o w i n g c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f S E I R N o . 3 3 9 , an u p d a t e t o t h e l i b r a r y f a c i l i t i e s f e e p r o g r a m in c l u d e d i n t h e S t a n d a r d i z e d D e ve l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e s u b m it t e d t o t h e C i t y C o u n c i l f o r re v i e w a n d c o n s i d e r a t i o n t o r e f l e c t th e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t i n t e n s i t i e s . Less than significant DA Y C A R E F A C I L I T I E S 5. 7 - 5 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d i n c r e a s e t h e s e r v i c e n e e d s fo r l o c a l d a y c a r e f a c i l i t i e s . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t . No m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e n e c e s s a r y . Not applicable. 5. 8 R E C R E A T I O N 5. 8 - 1 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d i n c r e a s e d e m a n d s o n ex i s t i n g p a r k s a n d r e c r e a t i o n a l fa c i l i t i e s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t 8 - 1 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , t h e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o se e k p r o p e r t y a c q u i s i t i o n op p o r t u n i t i e s f o r p a r k l a n d i n a n d ad j a c e n t t o t h e p r o j e c t a r e a . 8- 2 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n ta t i o n , t h e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o w o r k w i t h d e v e l o p e r s t o s e e k al t e r n a t i v e m e a n s o f p r o v i d i n g r e c r e a t i o n a l a m e n i t i e s . 8- 3 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t i m p l e m en t a t i o n , t h e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e f o s t e r i n g p a r t n e r s h i p s w i t h ot h e r p u b l i c e n t i t i e s a n d p r i v a t e o r g a n i z a t i o n s to s e e k a l t e r n a t i v e m e a n s o f p r o v i d i n g v a r i o u s ty p e s o f r e c r e a t i o n a l o p p o r t u n i t i e s . Less than significant 5. 8 - 2 : D e v e l o p m e n t o f r e c r e a t i o n a l fa c i l i t i e s w o u l d n o t h a v e a d v e r s e ph y s i c a l e f f e c t o n t h e en v i r o n m e n t . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t No m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e n e c e s s a r y . Not Applicable 5. 9 T R A N S P O R T A T I O N A N D T R A F F I C 5. 9 - 1 : P r o j e c t - r e l a t e d t r i p ge n e r a t i o n w o u l d i m p a c t l e v e l s o f se r v i c e f o r t h e a r e a r o a d w a y sy s t e m . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e r e f e r e n c e n u m b e r f o r ea c h m e a s u r e f r o m t h e M M P N o . 1 0 6 A i s s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 9- 1 Pr i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n sp e c t i o n f o r e a c h b u i l d in g w i t h c o m m e r c i a l , of f i c e , a n d / o r i n s t i t u t i o n a l u s e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l r e c o r d a c o v e n a n t o n th e p r o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g t h a t o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , T t he p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t a n d a d m i n i s t er a c o m p r e h e n s i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e m a n d Ma n a g e m e n t ( T D M ) p r o g r a m f o r a l l e m p l o y e e s . Th e f o r m o f t h e c o v e n a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d by t h e C i t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e . O b j e c t i v e s o f t h e T D M p r o g r a m s h a l l b e : ( 5. 1 0 - 2 ) • In c r e a s e r i d e s h a r i n g a n d u s e o f a l t e r n at i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s b y g u e s t s . Significant and unavoidable. All arterial roadways and intersections would operate at an acceptable level of service or no worse than No Project conditions provided planned roadway improvements are implemented. However, if these programs are not implemented by the 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 8 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation • Pr o v i d e a m e n u o f c o m m u t e a l t e r n a t i v e s f o r e m p l o y e e s t o r e d u c e p r o j e c t - g e n e r a t e d tr i p s . • Co n d u c t a n a n n u a l c o m m u t e r s u rv e y t o a s c e r t a i n t r i p g e n e r a t i o n , t r i p o r i g i n , a n d Av e r a g e V e h i c l e R i d e r s h i p . 9- 2 P r i o r t o th e f i r s t F i n a l B u i l d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n fo r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h c o m m e r c i a l , of f i c e , o r i n s t i t u t i o n a l u s e s , a n d o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e to t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w an d a p p r o v a l a m e n u o f T D M p r o g r a m s t r a t e g i e s a n d e l em e n t s f o r b o t h e x i s t i n g a n d f u t u r e em p l o y e e s ’ c o m m u t e o p t i o n s , t o i n c l ud e , b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o , t h e li s t b e l o w . T h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l a l s o r e c o rd a c o v e n a n t o n t h e p r o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g t h a t t h e a p p r o v e d TD M s t r a t e g i e s a n d e l e m e n t s b e i m p l e m e n t e d on g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n . T h e f o r m of t h e c o v e n a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i ty A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o r e c o r d a t i o n . fo l l o w i n g : ( 5. 1 0 - 2 ) • On - s i t e s e r v i c e s s u c h a s t h e f o o d , r e ta i l , a n d o t h e r s e r v i c e s b e p r o v i d e d . • Ri d e s h a r i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g o f a l l e m p l o y e e m e m b e r s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f pr o v i d i n g a “ m a t c h i n g ” o f e m p l o y e e s w i t h o t h e r e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e i n t h e s a m e ge o g r a p h i c a r e a s a n d w h o c o u l d r i d e s h a r e . • Va n p o o l i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g of a l l e m p l o y e e s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f ma t c h i n g n u m b e r s o f e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e i n g e o g r a p h i c p r o x i m i t y t o o n e a n o t h e r an d c o u l d c o m p r i s e a v a n p o o l o r p a r t i c i p at e i n t h e e x i s t i n g v a n p o o l p r o g r a m s . • Tr a n s i t P a s s . S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a R a p i d T r a n s i t D i s t r i c t a n d O r a n g e C o u n t y Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( i n c l u d i n g c o mm u t e r a i l ) p a s s e s b e p r o m o t e d t h r o u g h fin a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e a n d o n - s i t e s a l e s t o e n c o u r a g e e m p l o y e e s t o u s e t h e v a r i o u s tr a n s i t a n d b u s s e r v i c e s f r om t h r o u g h o u t t h e r e g i o n . • Sh u t t l e S e r v i c e . A c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g o f a l l e m plo y e e s l i v i n g i n p r o x i m i t y t o t h e p r o j e c t be g e n e r a t e d , a n d a l o c a l s h u t t l e p r o g r a m of f e r e d t o e n c o u r a g e e m p l o y e e s t o t r a v e l to w o r k b y m e a n s o t h e r t h a n t h e a u t o m o b i le . E v e n t s h u t t l e s e r v i c e w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e fo r t h e g u e s t s . • Bi c y c l i n g . A B i c y c l i n g P r o g r a m b e d e v e l o p e d t o o f f e r a b i c y c l i n g a l t e r n a t i v e t o em p l o y e e s . S e c u r e b i c y c l e r a c k s , l o c k e r s , a n d s h o w e r s b e p r o v i d e d a s p a r t o f t h i s pr o g r a m , M a p s o f b i c y c l e r o u t e s t h r o u g h o u t th e a r e a b e p r o v i d e d t o i n f o r m p o t e n t i a l bi c y c l i s t s o f t h e s e o p t i o n s . • Gu a r a n t e e d R i d e H o m e P r o g r a m . A p r o g r a m to p r o v i d e e m p l o y e e s wh o r i d e s h a r e , o r us e t r a n s i t o r o t h e r m e a n s o f c o m m u t i n g t o wo r k , w i t h a p r e a r r a n g e d r i d e h o m e i n a ta x i , r e n t a l c a r , s h u t t l e , o r o t h e r v e h i c l e , in t h e e v e n t o f e m e r g e n c i e s d u r i n g t h e w o r k sh i f t . • Ta r g e t R e d u c t i o n o f L o n g e s t C o m m u t e T r i p . A n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m f o r r i d e s h a r i n g agencies with the responsibility to do so, including Caltrans and the City of Orange, the project’s intersection, impacts would remain significant and unmitigated. 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 1 9 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation an d o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s to p u t h i g h e s t p r i o r i t y o n r e d u c t i o n o f lo n g e s t e m p l o y e e c o m m u t e t r i p s . • St a g g e r w o r k s h i f t s . • De v e l o p a “ c o m p r e s s e d w o r k w e e k ” p r o g r a m, w h i c h p r o v i d e s f o r f e w e r w o r k d a y s bu t l o n g e r d a i l y s h i f t s a s a n o p t i o n f o r e m p l o y e e s . • Ex p l o r e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f a “ t e l e c o m m u tin g ” p r o g r a m t h a t w o u l d l i n k s o m e em p l o y e e s v i a e l e c t r o n i c m e a n s (e . g . , c o m p u t e r w i t h m o d e m ) . • De v e l o p a p a r k i n g m a n a g e m e n t p r o g r a m t h at p r o v i d e s i n c e n t iv e s t o t h o s e w h o ri d e s h a r e o r u s e t r a n s i t m e a n s o t h e r t h a n sin g l e - o c c u p a n t a u t o t o t r a v e l t o w o r k . • Ac c e s s . P r e f e r e n t i a l a c c e s s t o h i g h o c c u p a n c y v e h i c l e s a n d s h u t t l e s m a y b e pr o v i d e d . • Fi n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r R i d e s h a r i n g a n d / o r Pu b l i c T r a n s i t . ( C u r r e n t l y , f e d e r a l l a w pr o v i d e s t a x - f r e e s t a t u s f o r u p t o $ 6 5 pe r m o n t h p e r e m p l o y e e c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o em p l o y e e s w h o v a n p o o l o r u s e p u b l i c t r a n s i t i n c l u d i n g c o m m u t e r r a i l a n d / o r e x p r e s s bu s p o o l s . ) • Fi n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r B i c y c l i n g . E m p l o y e e s o f f e r e d f i n a n c i a l i n c e n t i v e s f o r b i c y c l i n g to w o r k . • Sp e c i a l “ P r e m i u m ” f o r t h e P a r t i c i p a t i o n a n d P r o m o t i o n o f T r i p R e d u c t i o n . Tic k e t / p a s s e s t o s p e c i a l e v e n t s , v a c a t i o n , et c . b e o f f e r e d t o e m p l o y e e s w h o r e c r u i t ot h e r e m p l o y e e s f o r v a n p o o l , c a r p o o l , o r o t h e r t r i p r e d u c t i o n p r o g r a m s . • De s i g n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m s f o r c a r p o o l i n g an d o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s so a s t o p u t h i g h e s t p r io r i t y o n r e d u c t i o n o f lo n g e s t c o m m u t e t r i p s . Ev e r y p r o p e r t y o w n e r a n d / o r l e s s e e s h a l l de s i g n a t e a n o n - s i t e c o n t a c t w h o w i l l b e re s p o n s i b l e f o r c o o r d i n a t i n g w i t h t h e A T N a n d im p l e m e n t i n g a l l t r i p m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s . Th e o n - s i t e c o o r d i n a t o r s h a l l b e t h e o n e p o i n t of c o n t a c t r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e p r o j e c t w i t h t h e AT N . T h e T D M r e q u i r e m e n t s s h a l l b e i n c l u d e d in t h e l e a s e o r o t h e r a g r e e m e n t w i t h a l l o f th e p r o j e c t p a r t i c i p a n t s . 9- 3 Pr i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n sp e c t i o n , f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h o f f i c e a n d / o r co m m e r c i a l u s e s , T t he p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l j o i n a n d f i n a n c i a l l y p a r t i c i p a t e i n a cl e a n f u e l s h u t t l e p r o g r a m , i f es t a b l i s h e d a n d , s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e A n a h e i m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Ne t w o r k / T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t A s s o c i a t i o n i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e o n - g o i n g o p e r a t i o n o f th e p r o j e c t . Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l a l s o r e co r d a c o v e n a n t o n t h e p r o p e r t y t h a t re q u i r e s p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h e pr o g r a m o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t op e r a t i o n . T h e f o r m o f t h e co v e n a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o r e c o r d a t i o n . ( 5. 1 0 - 3 ) 9- 4 Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t fo r e a c h b u i l d i n g , th e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e ap p r o p r i a t e A p p r o p r i a t e T r a f f i c S i g n a l A s s e s s m e n t F e e s , 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 0 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation Tr a f f i c I m p a c t a n d I m p r o v e m e n t F e e s , a n d P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e I m p a c t F e e s sh a l l b e p a i d b y t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m i n a m o u n t s d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l Re s o l u t i o n i n e f f e c t a t t h e t i m e o f i s s u a n c e o f t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t w i t h c r e d i t g i v e n f o r C i t y - au t h o r i z e d i m p r o v e m e n t s p r o v i d ed b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ; a n d p a r t i c i p a t e i n a l l ap p l i c a b l e r e i m b u r s e m e n t o r b e n e f i t d i s t ri c t s w h i c h h a v e b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d . ( 5. 1 0 - 5 ) 9- 5 Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i r s t fi n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , T t he p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i r r e v o c a b l y o f f e r f o r d e d i c a t i o n (w i t h s u b o r d i n a t i o n o f e a s e m e n t s ) , i n c l u d i n g n e c e s s a r y c o n s t r u c t i o n e a s e m e n t s , t h e u l t i m a t e ar t e r i a l h i g h w a y r i g h t ( s ) - o f - w a y ad j a c e n t t o t h e i r p r o p e r t y as s h o w n i n t h e C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t of t h e A n a h e i m G e n e r a l P l a n ad j a c e n t t o t h e i r p r o p e r t y an d c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e a d o p t e d Pl a t i n u m T r i a n g l e M a s t e r L a n d U s e P l a n . ( 5. 1 0 - 6 ) Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s 9- 6 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t fo r a n y p r o j e c t f o r e c a s t t o g e n e r a t e 1 0 0 o r m o r e pe a k h o u r t r i p s , a s d e t e r m i n e d by t h e C i t y T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r ta t i o n M a n a g e r u t i l i z i n g A n a h e i m Tr a f f i c A n a l y s i s M o d e l T r i p G e n e r a t i o n R a t e s , p r op e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s s h a l l p r e p a r e t r a f f i c im p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g a n a l ys e s t o i d e n t i f y w h e n t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e R e v i s e d Pla t i n u m T r i a n g l e E x p a n s i o n P r o j e c t D r a f t T r a f f i c S t u d y R e p o r t , P a r s o n B r i n c k e r h o f f , A u g u s t 20 1 0 ( A p p e n d i x F o f t h i s S E I R ) s h a l l b e d e si g n e d a n d c o n s t r u c t e d . T h e D e v e l o p m e n t Ag r e e m e n t C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o va l s h a l l r e q u i r e t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o i m p l e m e n t tr a f f i c i m p r o v e m e n t s a s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e p r o j e c t t r a f f i c s t u d y t o m a i n t a i n s a t i s f a c t o r y l e v e l s o f se r v i c e a s d e f i n e d b y t h e C i t y ’ s G e n e r a l P l an , b a s e d o n t h r e s h o l d s o f s i g n i f i c a n c e , pe r f o r m a n c e s t a n d a r d s a n d m e t h o d o l o g i e s u t il i z e d i n S E I R N o . 3 3 9 , O r a n g e C o u n t y Co n g e s t i o n M a n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m a n d e s t a b l i s h e d in C i t y o f A n a h e i m T r a f f i c S t u d y G u i d e l i n e s . Th e i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g a n a l y s e s wi l l s p e c i f y t h e t i m i n g , f u n d i n g , c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d f a i r s h a r e re s p o n s i b i l i t i e s f o r a l l t r a f f i c i m p r o v e m e n t s n e c e s s a ry t o m a i n t a i n s a t i s f a c t o r y l e v e l s o f s e r v i c e wi t h i n t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m a n d s u r r o u n d i n g j u r i s d i c t i o n s . T h e De v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t Co n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l s h a l l r e q u i r e t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o c o n s t r u c t , b o n d f o r o r en t e r i n t o a f u n d i n g a g r e e m e n t f o r n e c e s s a r y c i r c u l a t i o n s y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t s , a s d e t e r m i n e d by t h e C i t y T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r ta t i o n M a n a g e r , u n l e s s a l t e r n a t i v e f u n d i n g s o u r c e s h a v e b e e n id e n t i f i e d . 9- 7 I n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a n y t r af f i c i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g an a l y s e s a s r e q u i r e d i n Mit i g a t i o n M e a s u r e 9 - 6 , p r o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v el o p e r s w i l l a n a l y z e t o d e t e r m i n e w h e n t h e in t e r s e c t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s s h a ll b e c o n s t r u c t e d , s u b j e c t t o th e c o n d i t i o n s i d e n t i f i e d i n Mit i g a t i o n M e a s u r e 9 - 6 . Th e i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g a n a l y s e s wil l s p e c i f y t h e t i m i n g , f u n d i n g , c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d f a i r - s h a r e re s p o n s i b i l i t i e s f o r a l l t r a f f i c i m p r o v e m e n t s n e c e s s a ry t o m a i n t a i n s a t i s f a c t o r y l e v e l s o f s e r v i c e wi t h i n t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m a n d su r r o u n d i n g j u r i s d i c t i o n s . A t m i n i m u m , f a i r - s h a r e c a l c u l a t i o n s sh a l l i n c l u d e i n t e r s e c t i o n i m pr o v e m e n t s , r i g h t s - o f - w a y , a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n c o s t s , u n l e s s 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 1 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation al t e r n a t i v e f u n d i n g s o u r c e s h av e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d t o h e l p p a y f o r t h e i m p r o v e m e n t . Th e D e v e l o p m e n t A g r e e m e n t C o n d i t i o n s o f A p p r o v a l s h a l l r e q u i r e t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o c o n s t r u c t , b o n d f o r o r e n t e r i n t o a f u n d i n g a g r e e m e n t f o r n e c e s s a r y ci r c u l a t i o n s y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t s , a s d e t e r m i n ed b y t h e C i t y T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Ma n a g e r , u n l e s s a l t e r n a t i v e f u n d i n g s o u r c e s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d . 9- 8 I n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a n y t r af f i c i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g an a l y s e s a s r e q u i r e d i n Mit i g a t i o n M e a s u r e 9 - 6 , t h e f o l l o w i n g a c t i o n s s h all b e t a k e n i n c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h t h e C i t y o f Or a n g e : a) T h e t r a f f i c i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g a n a l y s i s s h a ll i d e n t i f y a n y i m p a c t s cr e a t e d b y t h e p r o j e c t on f a c i l i t i e s w i t h i n t h e C i t y o f O r a n g e . T h e f a i r - s h a r e p e r c e n t a g e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r mi t i g a t i n g t h e s e i m p a c t s s h a l l b e c a l c u l a t e d i n t h i s a n a l y s i s . b) T h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m s h a l l e s ti m a t e t h e c o s t o f t h e p r o j e c t ’ s f a i r - s h a r e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i n co o p e r a t i o n w i t h t h e C i t y o f O r a n g e . c) T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t s h a l l p a y t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m t h e f a i r - s ha r e c o s t p r i o r t o i s s u a n c e of a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t . T h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m s h a l l h o l d t h e a m o u n t r e c e i v e d i n t r u s t , a n d th e n , o n c e a m u t u a l l y a g r e e d u p on j o i n t p r o g r a m i s e x e c u t e d by b o t h c i t i e s , t h e C i t y o f An a h e i m s h a l l a l l o c a t e t h e f a i r - s h a r e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t r a f f i c m i t i g a t i o n pr o g r a m s t h a t r e s u l t in i m p r o v e d t r a f f i c f l o w a t t h e i m p a c t e d l o c a t i o n s , v i a a n ag r e e m e n t m u t u a l l y a c c e p t a b l e to b o t h c i t i e s . (d ) T h e C i t y s h a l l w o r k w i t h t h e C i t y o f O r an g e t o a m e n d t h e J C F A t o e n s u r e t h a t f a i r sh a r e f e e s c o l l e c t e d t o m i t i g a t e a r t e r i a l an d i n t e r s e c t i o n i m p a ct s i n t h e C i t y o r Or a n g e a r e m i t i g a t e d t o t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e . 9- 9 I n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a n y t r af f i c i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g an a l y s e s a s r e q u i r e d i n Mit i g a t i o n M e a s u r e 9 - 6 , a n d a s s u m i n g t h a t a r e gi o n a l t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a g e n c y h a s n o t a l r e a d y pr o g r a m m e d a n d f u n d e d t h e w a r r a n t e d i m p r o v e m e n ts t o t h e i m p a c t e d f r e e w a y m a i n l i n e o r fr e e w a y r a m p l o c a t i o n s , p r o p e r ty o w n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s a n d t h e Ci t y w i l l t a k e t h e f o l l o w i n g ac t i o n s i n c o o p e r a t i o n w i t h C a l t r a n s : a) T h e t r a f f i c s t u d y w i l l i d e n t i f y t h e P r o j e c t ’ s pr o p o r t i o n a t e i m p a c t o n t h e s p e c i f i c f r e e w a y ma i n l i n e a n d / o r f r e e w a y r a m p lo c a t i o n s a n d i t s f a i r s h a r e p e r c e n t a g e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r mi t i g a t i n g t h e s e i m p a c t s b a s e d o n t h r e s h o l d s o f s i g n i f i c a n c e , p e r f o r m a n c e s t a n d a r d s a n d me t h o d o l o g i e s u t i l i z e d i n S E I R N o . 3 3 9 a n d e s ta b l i s h e d i n t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y C o n g e s t i o n Ma n a g e m e n t P r o g r a m a n d C i t y o f An a h e i m T r a f f i c S t u d y G u i d e l i n e s . b) T h e C i t y s h a l l e s t i m a t e t h e co s t o f t h e p r o j e c t ’ s f a i r - s h a r e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y i n c o o p e r a t i o n wi t h C a l t r a n s . 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 2 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 9- 1 0 Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i na l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f a B u i l d i n g P e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r oc c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / de v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e i d e n t i f i e d f a i r - s h a r e r e s p o n s i b i l i t y a s de t e r m i n e d b y t h e C i t y a s s e t f o r t h i n M i t i g a tio n M e a s u r e 9 - 9 . T h e C i t y s h a l l a l l o c a t e t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s fa i r - s h a r e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t r a f f i c m i ti g a t i o n p r o g r a m s th a t r e s u l t i n im p r o v e d t r a f f i c f l o w o n t h e i m p a c t e d m a i n l i n e an d r a m p l o c a t i o n s , v i a an a g r e e m e n t m u t u a l l y ac c e p t a b l e t o C a l t r a n s a n d t h e C i t y . 9- 1 1 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i r s t f i n a l s u b d i v i s io n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o pe r s h a l l i r r e v o c a b l y o f f e r f o r d e d i c a t i o n ( w i t h su b o r d i n a t i o n o f e a s e m e n t s ) , i n c l u d i n g n e c e s s a r y c o n s t r u c t i o n e a s e m e n t s , t h e u l t i m a t e a r t e r i a l hi g h w a y r i g h t ( s ) - o f - w a y a d j a c e n t to t h e i r p r o p e r t y a s s h o w n i n th e C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t o f t h e An a h e i m G e n e r a l P l a n a n d c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e a d o p t e d P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e M a s t e r L a n d U s e Pla n , r e g a r d l e s s o f t h e l e v e l o f i m p a c t s g e n e r a t e d b y t h e p r o j e c t . Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n F e e P r o g r a m 9- 1 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m it f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r sh a l l p a y t h e a p p r o p r i a t e T r a f f i c S i g n a l A s s e ss m e n t F e e s , T r a f f i c I m p a c t a n d I m p r o v e m e n t Fe e s , C o m m u n i t y F a c i l i t i e s D i s t r i c t F e e s , a n d P l at i n u m T r i a n g l e I m p a c t Fe e s t o t h e C i t y o f An a h e i m i n a m o u n t s d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l R e s o l u t i o n i n e f f e c t a t t h e t i m e o f i s s u a n c e of t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t w i t h c r e d i t g i v e n f o r Ci t y - a u t h o r i z e d i m p r o v e m en t s p r o v i d e d b y t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ; a n d p a r t i c i p a t e i n a ll a p p l i c a b l e r e i m b u r s e m e n t o r b e n e f i t d i s t r i c t s wh i c h h a v e b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d . 9- 1 3 S u b s e q u e n t t o t h e c e r t i f i c a t io n o f t h e F E I R , a n d p r i o r t o t h e ap p r o v a l o f t h e f i r s t D e v e l o p m e n t Ag r e e m e n t , i f t h e c o s t s o f t h e i d e n t i f i e d i m p r o v e m e n ts i n t h i s t r a f f i c s t u d y c a n n o t b e c o v e r e d by t h e t o t a l f u n d i n g a l l o c a t i o n un d e r t h e e x i s t i n g C o m m u n i t y F a c i l i t i e s D i s t r i c t ( C F D ) , a n update to t h e C F D or an up d a t e to o f t h e e x i s t i n g C i t y ’s t r a f f i c im p a c t fe e p r o g r a m o r o t h e r f e e pr o g r a m s s h a l l b e d e v e l o p e d b y t h e C i t y of A n a h e i m t o e n s u r e c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e re c o m m e n d e d i m p r o v e m e n t s . An y u p d a t e d C F D o r C i t y t r a f f i c f e e p r o g r a m s h a l l i n c l u d e t h e co s t s o f i m p l e m e n t i n g i d e n t i f i e d i n t e r s e c t i o n an d / o r a r t e r i a l i m p r o v e m e n t s i n t h e C i t y o f Or a n g e . Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n D e m a n d M a n a g e m e n t ( T D M ) P r o g r a m 9- 1 4 P r i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n sp e c t i o n f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h c o m m e r c i a l , o f f i c e , an d / o r i n s t i t u t i o n a l u s e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s /d e v e l o p e r s h a l l r e c o r d a c o v e n a n t o n t h e pr o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g t h a t o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r sh a l l i m p l e m e n t a n d a d m i n i s t e r a c o m p r e h e n s i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e m a n d M a n a g e m e n t ( T D M ) pr o g r a m f o r a l l e m p l o y e e s . T h e f o r m o f t h e c o v e n a nt s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y A t t o r n e y ’ s Of f i c e . O b j e c t i v e s o f t h e T D M p r o g r a m s h a l l b e : • In c r e a s e r i d e s h a r i n g a n d u s e o f a l t e r n at i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s b y g u e s t s . • Pr o v i d e a m e n u o f c o m m u t e a l t e r n a t i v e s f o r e m p l o y e e s t o r e d u c e p r o j e c t - g e n e r a t e d 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 3 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation tr i p s . • Co n d u c t a n a n n u a l c o m m u t e r s u r v e y t o a s c e rt a i n t r i p g e n e r a t i o n , t r i p o r i g i n , a n d Av e r a g e V e h i c l e R i d e r s h i p . 9- 1 5 P r i o r t o t h e f i r s t F i n a l B u i l d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n sp e c t i o n f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h c o m m e r c i a l , o f f i c e , or i n s t i t u t i o n a l u s e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e t o t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c Wo r k s D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l a me n u o f T D M p r o g r a m s t r a t e g i e s a n d e l e m e n t s fo r b o t h e x i s t i n g a n d f u t u r e e m plo y e e s ’ c o m m u t e o p t i o n s , t o i n c l u d e , b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o , t h e li s t b e l o w . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l a l so r e c o r d a c o v e n a n t o n t h e p r o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g th a t t h e a p p r o v e d T D M s t r a t e g i e s a n d e l e m e n ts b e i m p l e m e n t e d o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t op e r a t i o n . T h e f o r m o f t h e c o v e n a n t s h a l l b e a pp r o v e d b y t h e C i t y A t t o rn e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o re c o r d a t i o n . E v e r y p r o p e r t y o w n e r a n d / o r l e s s e e s h a l l d e s i g n a t e a n o n - s i t e c o n t a c t w h o w i l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e fo r c o o r d i n a t i n g w i t h t h e A T N a n d i m p l e m e n t i n g a l l t r i p m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s . T h e o n - s i t e co o r d i n a t o r s h a l l b e t h e o n e p o i n t o f c o n t a c t r e pr e s e n t i n g t h e p r o j e c t wi t h t h e A T N . T h e T D M re q u i r e m e n t s s h a l l b e i n c l u d e d i n t h e l e a s e o r o t h e r a g r e e m en t w i t h a l l o f t h e p r o j e c t pa r t i c i p a n t s . • On - s i t e s e r v i c e s . O n - s i t e s e r v i c e s s u c h as t h e f o o d , r e t a i l , a n d o t h e r s e r v i c e s . • Ri d e s h a r i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g o f a l l e m p l o y e e m e m b e r s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f pr o v i d i n g a “ m a t c h i n g ” o f e m p l o y e e s w i t h o t h e r e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e i n t h e s a m e ge o g r a p h i c a r e a s a n d w h o c o u l d r i d e s h a r e . • Va n p o o l i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g of a l l e m p l o y e e s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f ma t c h i n g n u m b e r s o f e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e i n g e o g r a p h i c p r o x i m i t y t o o n e a n o t h e r an d c o u l d c o m p r i s e a v a n p o o l o r p a r t i c i p at e i n t h e e x i s t i n g v a n p o o l p r o g r a m s . • Tr a n s i t P a s s . P r o m o t e O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p or t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( i n c l u d i n g c o m m u t e r ra i l ) p a s s e s t h r o u g h f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e a n d o n - s i t e s a l e s t o e n c o u r a g e e m p l o y e e s to u s e t h e v a r i o u s t r a n s i t a n d b u s s e rv i c e s f r o m t h r o u g h o u t t h e r e g i o n . • Sh u t t l e S e r v i c e . G e n e r a t e a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g of a l l e m p l o y e e s l i v i n g i n p r o x i m i t y t o th e p r o j e c t , a n d a l o c a l s h u tt l e p r o g r a m o f f e r e d t o e n c o u r a g e e m p l o y e e s t o t r a v e l t o wo r k b y m e a n s o t h e r t h a n t h e a u t o m o b i l e . • Bi c y c l i n g . D e v e l o p a B i c y c l i n g P r o g r a m t o o f f e r a b i c y c l i n g a l t e r n a t i v e t o e m p l o y e e s . Se c u r e b i c y c l e r a c k s , l o c k e r s, a n d s h o w e r s s h o u l d b e p r o v i d e d a s p a r t o f t h i s pr o g r a m . M a p s o f b i c y c l e r o u t e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e a r e a s h o u l d b e p r o v i d e d t o i n f o r m po t e n t i a l b i c y c l i s t s of t h e s e o p t i o n s . • Gu a r a n t e e d R i d e H o m e P r o g r a m . D e v e l o p a p r o g r a m t o p r o v i d e e m p l o y e e s w h o ri d e s h a r e , o r u s e t r a n s i t o r o t h e r m e a n s of c o m m u t i n g t o w o r k , w i t h a p r e a r r a n g e d ri d e h o m e i n a t a x i , r e n t a l c a r , s h u t t l e , o r o t h e r v e h i c l e , i n t h e e v e n t o f e m e r g e n c i e s 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 4 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation du r i n g t h e w o r k s h i f t . • Ta r g e t R e d u c t i o n o f L o n g e s t C o m m u t e T r ip . P r o m o t e a n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m f o r ri d e s h a r i n g a n d o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a ti o n m o d e s t o p u t h i gh e s t p r i o r i t y o n re d u c t i o n o f l o n g e s t e m pl o y e e c o m m u t e t r i p s . • Wo r k S h i f t s . S t a g g e r w o r k s h i f t s . • Co m p r e s s e d W o r k W e e k . D e v e l o p a “ c o m p r e s s e d w o r k w e e k ” p r o g r a m , w h i c h pr o v i d e s f o r f e w e r w o r k d a y s b u t l o n g e r d a il y s h i f t s a s a n o p t i o n f o r e m p l o y e e s . • Te l e c o m m u t i n g . E x p l o r e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f a “t e l e c o m m u t i n g ” p r o g r a m t h a t w o u l d l i n k so m e e m p l o y e e s v i a e l e c t r o n i c m e an s ( e . g . , c o m p u t e r w i t h m o d e m ) . • Pa r k i n g M a n a g e m e n t . D e v e l o p a p a r k i n g ma n a g e m e n t p r o g r a m t h a t p r o v i d e s in c e n t i v e s t o t h o s e w h o r i d e s h a r e o r u s e tr a n s i t m e a n s o t h e r t h a n s i n g l e - o c c u p a n t au t o t o t r a v e l t o w o r k . • Ac c e s s . P r o v i d e p r e f e r e n t i a l a c c e s s t o h i g h o c c u p a n c y v e h i c l e s a n d s h u t t l e s . • Fi n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r R i d e s h a r i n g a n d / o r Pu b l i c T r a n s i t . O f f e r e m p l o y e e s f i n a n c i a l in c e n t i v e s f o r r i d e s h a r i n g o r u s i n g p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . C u r r en t l y , f e d e r a l l a w pr o v i d e s t a x - f r e e s t a t u s f o r u p t o $ 6 5 pe r m o n t h p e r e m p l o y e e c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o em p l o y e e s w h o v a n p o o l o r u s e p u b l i c t r a n s i t i n c l u d i n g c o m m u t e r r a i l a n d / o r e x p r e s s bu s p o o l s . • Fi n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r B i c y c l i n g . O f f e r e m p l oy e e s f i n a n c i a l i n c e n t i v e s f o r b i c y c l i n g t o wo r k . • Sp e c i a l “ P r e m i u m ” f o r t h e P a r t i c i p a t i o n a n d P r o m o t i o n o f T r i p R e d u c t i o n . O f f e r ti c k e t / p a s s e s t o s p e c i a l e v e n t s , v a c a t i o n , et c . b e o f f e r e d t o e m p l o y e e s w h o r e c r u i t ot h e r e m p l o y e e s f o r v a n p o o l , c a r p o o l , o r o t h e r t r i p r e d u c t i o n p r o g r a m s . • In c e n t i v e P r o g r a m s . D e s i g n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m s f o r c a r p o o l i n g a n d o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e tr a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s s o a s t o p u t h i g h e s t pr i o r i t y o n r e d u c t i o n o f l o n g e s t c o m m u t e tr i p s . Pa r t i c i p a t i o n I n t h e A n a h e i m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n N e t w o r k ( A T N ) 9 -16 Pr i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z on i n g i n s p e c t i o n , f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h o f f i c e a n d / o r co m m e r c i a l u s e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l j o i n a n d f i n a nc i a l l y p a r t i c i p a t e i n a c l e a n fu e l s h u t t l e p r o g r a m , i f e s t a bli s h e d a n d , s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e in t h e A n a h e i m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n Ne t w o r k / T r a n s p o rt a t i o n M a n a g e m e n t A s s o c i a t i o n i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h t h e o n -go i n g o p e r a t i o n o f th e p r o j e c t . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / de v e l o p e r s h a l l a l s o r e c o r d a c o ve n a n t o n t h e p r o p e r t y t h a t re q u i r e s p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h e pr o g r a m o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n . T h e f o r m o f t h e co v e n a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y At t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o r e c o r d a t i o n . 9 -17 Pr i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h o f f i c e a n d / o r 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 5 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation co m m e r c i a l u s e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e lo p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p r o o f t o t h e P u b l i c W o r k s , T r a n s i t Pla n n i n g D i v i s i o n t h a t t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e lo p e r h a s e n t e r e d i n t o a n a g r e e m e n t w i t h t h e An a h e i m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n N e t w o r k ( A T N ) f o r t h e p r ov i s i o n o f a t r a n s i t s h u t t l e s e r v i c e b e t w e e n th e p r o j e c t , t h e e x i s t i n g M e tr o l i n k S t a t i o n a n d f u t u r e A na h e i m R e g i o n a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n In t e r m o d a l C e n t e r ( A R T I C ) a s w e l l a s m a j o r a c t i vi t y c e n t e r s i n b e t w e e n . T h e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l be r e c o r d e d i n t h e O f f i c i a l R e c o r d s o f t h e Of f i c e o f t h e C o u n t y R e c o r d e r , O r a n g e C o u n t y , Ca l i f o r n i a . T h e f o r m o f t h e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l be a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y A tt o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o re c o r d a t i o n . T h e a g r e e m e n t s h al l p r o v i d e f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g : a. A s h u t t l e r o u t e p l a n , a p p r o v e d b y t h e P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t , T r a n s i t P l a n n i n g D i v i s i o n an d A T N , s h a l l b e a t t a c h e d an d i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e ag r e e m e n t . T h e p l a n s h a l l i n c l u d e co -lo c a t i o n o f s t o p s w i t h O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y b u s s t o p l o c a t i o n s a n d ot h e r p r o p e r t i e s i n t h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e w h er e f e a s i b l e a n d d e t e r m i n e d a p p r o p r i a t e b y th e P u b l i c W o r k s T r a n s i t P l a n n i n g D i v i s i o n a n d AT N . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l pa y a l l c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e p r ep a r a t i o n o f t h e s h u t t l e r o u t e p l a n . b. Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e t h e f u l l c o s t a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p r o v i d i n g t h e sh u t t l e , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t li m i t e d t o , p u r c h a s i n g t h e s h u t t l e v e h i c l e a n d a l l c o s t s as s o c i a t e d w i t h o p e r a t i n g a n d m a r k e t i n g t h e s h u t t l e r o u t e . c. Th e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l p r o v i d e a m e c h a n i s m f o r th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o r e q u e s t fa i r s h a r e p a r t i c i p a t i o n f r o m o t h e r m a j o r a c t i v i t y c e n t e r s t o b e s e r v e d b y t h i s sh u t t l e r o u t e . Th e m e c h a n i s m s h a l l b e s u b j e c t to t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e A T N . d. Th e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l s e t f o r t h a s c h e d u l e f o r c o m m e n c e m e n t o f o p e r a t i o n o f t h e s h u t t l e se r v i c e . e. Th e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l p r o v i d e th a t t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e ve l o p e r ' s o b l i g a t i o n s t o f un d t h e sh u t t l e s e r v i c e m a y b e c a n c e l l e d o n l y u p o n p r i o r w r i t t e n a p p r o v a l f r o m t h e P u b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t , T r a n s i t P l a n n i n g D i v i s i o n ' s o n c e a n e w t r a n s i t s e r v i c e h a s t a k e n i t s p l a c e . f. Th a t t o t h e e x t e n t p e r m i t t e d b y l a w t h e t e r m s o f t h i s a g r e e m e n t s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e c o v e n a n t s wh i c h s h a l l r u n w i t h t h e p r o p er t y f o r t h e b e n e f i t t h e r e o f , a n d t h e b e n e f i t s o f t h i s ag r e e m e n t s h a l l b i n d a n d i n u r e t o t h e b e n e f i t o f t h e p a r t i e s a n d a l l s u c c e s s o r s i n i n t e r e s t to t h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o . 5. 9 - 2 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d i n c r e a s e t r a f f i c v o l u m e s o n Ca l t r a n s f a c i l i t i e s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Sa m e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s f o r I m p a c t 5 . 9 - 1 . Significant and unavoidable. All Caltrans intersections and freeway mainline segments would operate at an acceptable level of service or no worse than No Project 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 6 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation conditions provided planned roadway improvements are implemented. However, if these programs are not implemented by the agencies with the responsibility to do so, the project’s freeway ramp and mainline impacts would remain significant and unmitigated. 5. 9 - 3 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d r e s u l t i n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f re s i d e n t i a l u s e s w i t h i n c l o s e pr o x i m i t y t o s e v e r a l h e l i p o r t s . Le s s T h a n S i g n i f i c a n t N o m i t i g a t i o n m e as u r e s a r e n e c e s s a r y . N o t a p p l i c a b l e 5. 9 - 4 : P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t w o u l d n o t su b s t a n t i a l l y i n c r e a s e h a z a r d s d u e to a d e s i g n f e a t u r e ( s h a r p c u r v e s , et c . ) o r p o t e n t i a l l y c o n f l i c t i n g us e s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t 9 - 1 6 I n c o n j u n c t i on w i t h t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f a n y t r a f f i c i m pr o v e m e n t p h a s i n g a n a l ys e s a s r e q u i r e d i n Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e 9 - 6 , p r o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v elo p e r s w i l l a n a l y z e t o d e t e r m i n e w h e n t h e in t e r s e c t i o n i m p r o v e m e n t s i d e n t i fi e d u n d e r I m p a c t 5 . 9 - 4 s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d , s u b j e c t t o t h e co n d i t i o n s i d e n t i f i e d i n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e 9 - 6 . 9- 1 7 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f a F i n a l S i t e P l a n , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o pe r s h a l l m e e t w i t h t h e Tr a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r t o d e t e r m i n e w h e t h e r a b u s s t o p ( s ) i s r e q u i r e d t o b e pl a c e d a d j a c e n t t o t h e p r o p e r t y . I f a b u s s t o p ( s ) i s r e q u i r e d , i t s h a l l b e p l ac e d i n a l o c a t i o n t h a t le a s t i m p a c t s t r a f f i c f l o w a n d m a y b e d e s i g n e d a s a b u s t u r n o u t o r a f a r s i d e b u s s t o p a s re q u i r e d b y t h e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n sp o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r a n d p e r t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( O C T A ) . Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 7 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 5. 9 - 5 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d n o t r e s u l t i n i n a d e q u a t e em e r g e n c y a c c e s s . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t No s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d a n d n o m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e r e q u i r e d . Not Applicable 5. 9 - 6 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d p r o m o t e a l t e r n a t i v e f o r m s of t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . Le s s t h a n s i g n i f i c a n t No s i g n i f i c a n t i m p a c t s h a v e b e e n i d e n t i f i e d a n d n o m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e r e q u i r e d . Not Applicable 5. 1 0 U T I L I T I E S A N D S E R V I C E S Y S T E M S 5. 1 0 - 1 : P r o j e c t - g e n e r a t e d s e w a g e co u l d b e a d e q u a t e l y t r e a t e d b y t h e se w e r s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r f o r t h e Pr o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 10 - 1 T h e C i t y E n g i n e e r sh a l l r e v i e w t h e l o c a t i o n o f e a c h p r o j e c t to d e t e r m i n e i f i t i s l o c a t e d w i t h i n a n ar e a s e r v e d b y d e f i c i e n t s e w e r f a c i l i t i e s , a s i d e n t i f i e d i n th e l a t e s t u p d a t e d s e w e r s t u d y f o r the Pla t i n u m T r i a n g l e S e w e r S t u d y . I f t h e p r o j e c t w i l l i n c r e a s e s e w e r f l o w s b e y o n d t h o s e pr o g r a m m e d i n t h e a p p r o p r i a t e m a s t e r p l a n s e w e r st u d y f o r t h e a r e a o r i f t h e p r o j e c t c u r r e n t l y di s c h a r g e s t o a n e x i s t i n g d e f i c i e n t s e w e r s y s t e m or w i l l c r e a t e a d e f i c i e n c y i n a n e x i s t i n g s e w e r li n e , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e q u i r ed t o g u a r a n t e e m i t i g a t i on o f t h e i m p a c t t o ad e q u a t e l y s e r v e t h e a r e a t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r a n d C i t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e . Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d to i n s t a l l t h e s a n i t a r y s e w e r f a c i l i t i e s , a s re q u i r e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r , t o mi t i g a t e t h e i m p a c t s o f t h e p ro p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t b a s e d up o n t h e B e n e f i t P a r c e l s a n d D e v e l o p m e n t M i t i g a tio n ( A p p e n d i x D o f t h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e Se w e r S t u d y ) , p r i o r t o a c c e p t a n c e f o r m a i n t e n a n c e of p u b l i c i m p r o v e m e n t s b y t h e C i t y o r f i n a l Bu i l d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n f o r t h e b u i l d i n g /s t r u c t u r e , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t . Pr i o r t o ap p r o v a l o f a f i n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r e a c h de v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t, t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e re q u i r e d t o i n s t a l l t h e s a n i t a r y se w e r f a c i l i t i e s , a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r , t o m i t i g a t e th e i m p a c t s o f t h e p r o p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t b a s e d u p o n t h e l a t e s t u p d a t e d s e w e r s t u d y f o r th e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e . Ad d i t i o n a l l y , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e ve l o p e r s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e In f r a s t r u c t u r e I m p r o v e m e n t ( F e e ) P r o g r a m , i f a d op t e d f o r t h e p r o j e c t a r e a , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y th e C i t y E n g i n e e r , w h i c h c o u l d i n c l u d e f e e s , cr e d i t s , r e i m b u r s e m e n t s , c o n s t r u c t i o n , o r a co m b i n a t i o n t h e r e o f . ( 5. 1 1 -5 ) 10 - 2 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l a n d o n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n o f an y s t r e e t i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n s w i t h i n th e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e , w h i c h e n c o m p a s s a r e a ( s ) w h e r e Or a n g e C o u n t y S a n i t a t i o n D i s t r i c t (OC S D ) w i l l b e u p s i z i n g t r u n k l i n e s a n d / o r a r e m a k i n g o t h e r i m p r o v e m e n t s , t h e C i t y a n d / o r pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l c o o r d i n a t e w i t h th e O C S D t o e n s u r e t h a t a l l i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d co n s t r u c t i o n s c h e d u l e s a r e c o o r d i n a t e d . ( 5. 1 1 - 7 ) Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 8 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 10 - 3 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l s u bd i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d in g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r e a c h de v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l c o n t a c t O r a n g e Co u n t y S a n i t a t i o n D i s t r i c t ( O C S D ) r e g a r d i n g s e w e r c a p a c i t y . A d d i t i o n a l l y , i f r e q u e s t e d b y t h e OC S D , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p l a c e u p to t h r e e f l o w m o n i t o r i n g d e v i c e s f o r u p t o a mo n t h t o v e r i f y c a p a c i t y a n d e n s u r e c o n s i s te n c y w i t h t h e O C S D ’ s m o d e l i n g r e s u l t s . 10 - 4 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f s a n i t a r y s e w e r c o n n e c t io n s f o r e a c h d e v e l o p m e n t p r o j e c t , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d t o i n s t a l l t h e s a n i t a r y s e w e r f a c i l i t i e s , a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e C i t y En g i n e e r , t o p r e v e n t t h e s e w e r s p i l l f o r b e l o w - g r ad e s t r u c t u r e s o f t h e p r o p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t ba s e d u p o n t h e l a t e s t u p d a t e d s e we r s t u d y f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e. W h e r e r e q u e s t e d b y t h e C i t y En g i n e e r , s e w e r i m p r o v e m e n t s s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d w i t h l a r g e r t h a n r e c o m m e n d e d d i a m e t e r t o ma i n t a i n t h e s u r c h a r g e l e v e l s w i t h i n t h e p i p e a n d th e i n v e r t e l e v a t i o n o f s e w e r l a t e r a l s s h a l l b e lo c a t e d a b o v e t h e h y d r a u l i c g r a d e l i n e e l e v a t i o n o f t h e s u r c h a r g e l e v e l s w h e n t h e y a r e a b o v e t h e pi p e c r o w n . 10 - 5 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l a n d o n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r uc t i o n o f a n y s t r e e t i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n s w i t h i n t h e Pla t i n u m T r i a n g l e , w h i c h e n c o m p a s s a r e a ( s ) w h e r e O C S D w i l l b e u p s i z i n g t r u c k l i n e s a n d / o r a r e ma k i n g o t h e r i m p r o v e m e n t s , t h e C i t y a n d / o r p r o p e r ty o w n e r s h a l l c o o r d i n a t e w i t h O C S D t o e n s u r e th a t b a c k f l o w p r e v e n t i o n d e v i c e s a r e i n s t a l l e d a t th e l a t e r a l c o n n e c t i o n s t o p r e v e n t s u r c h a r g e f l o w fr o m e n t e r i n g p r i v a t e p r o p e r t i e s . 10 - 6 P r i o r t o f i n a l d e s i g n a p p r o v a l , a d d i t i o n a l a n a l y s i s s h a l l b e p e r f o r m e d f o r e a c h i n d i v i d u a l p r o j e c t us i n g f l o w , w e t - w e a t h e r d a t a , a n d o t h e r i n f o r m a t i o n s p e c i f i c f o r t h a t p r o j e c t i n o r d e r t o o b t a i n mo r e a c c u r a t e r e s u l t s o f t h e s u r c h a r g e l e v e l s f o r f i n a l d e s i g n . 5. 1 0 - 2 : W a t e r s u p p l y a n d d e l i v e r y sy s t e m s a r e a d e q u a t e t o m e e t pr o j e c t r e q u i r e m e n t s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 10 - 7 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , s u b m i t t e d l a n d s c a p e p l a n s s h a l l d e m o n s t r a t e co m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e C i t y o f An a h e i m a d o p t e d L a n d s c a p e W a t e r Ef f i c i e n c y G u i d e l i n e s . T h i s or d i n a n c e i s i n c o m p l i a n c e w i th t h e S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a Mo d e l W a t e r Ef f i c i e n t L a n d s c a p e Or d i n a n c e ( A B 1 8 8 1 ) Co n s e r v a t i o n i n L a n d s c a p i n g A c t ( A B 3 2 5 ) . A m o n g t h e m e a s u r e s t o b e i m p l e m e n t e d w i t h t h e p r o j e c t ar e t h e f o l l o w i n g : • Us e o f w a t e r - c o n s e r v i n g l a n d s c a p e pl a n t m a t e r i a l s w h e r e v e r f e a s i b l e ; • Us e o f v a c u u m s a n d o t h e r e q u i p m e n t t o r e d u ce t h e u s e o f w a t e r f o r w a s h d o w n o f ex t e r i o r a r e a s ; • Lo w - f l o w f i t t i n g s , f i x t u r e s a n d e q u i p m e n t i n c l u d i n g l o w f l u s h t o i l e t s a n d u r i n a l s ; Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 2 9 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation • Us e o f s e l f - c l o s i n g v a l v e s f o r d r i n k i n g f o u n t a i n s ; • Us e o f e f f i c i e n t i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s s u c h a s d r i p i r r i g a t i o n a n d a u t o m a t i c s y s t e m s wh i c h u s e m o i s t u r e s e n s o r s ; • In f r a r e d s e n s o r s o n s i n k s , t o i l e t s a n d u r i n a l s ; • Lo w - f l o w s h o w e r h e a d s i n h o t e l s ; • In f r a r e d s e n s o r s o n d r i n k i n g f o u n t a i n s ; • Us e o f i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s p r i m a r i l y a t n i g h t , w h e n e v a p o r a t i o n r a t e s a r e l o w e s t ; • Wa t e r - e f f i c i e n t i c e m a c h i n e s , d i s h w a s h e r s , c l o t h e s w a s h e r s , a n d o t h e r w a t e r u s i n g ap p l i a n c e s ; • Co o l i n g t o w e r r e c i r c u l a t i n g s y s t e m ; • Us e o f l o w - f l o w s p r i n k l e r h e a d s i n i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m ; • Us e o f w a t e r w a y r e c i r c u l a t i o n s y s t e m s ; • Pr o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e p u b l i c i n c o n s p i c u o u s p l a c e s r e g a r d i n g w a t e r co n s e r v a t i o n ; a n d • Us e o f r e c l a i m e d w a t e r f o r i r r i g a t i o n a n d w a s h d o w n w h e n i t b e c o m e s a v a i l a b l e . I n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h s u b m i t t a l o f l a n d s c a p e a n d b u il d i n g p l a n s , t h e a p p l i c an t s h a l l i d e n t i f y w h i c h of t h e s e m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n i n co r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e p l a n s . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 ) 10 - 8 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g pe r m i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e en g i n e e r i n g s t u d i e s , i n c l u d i n g n e t w o r k a n a l y s i s , t o s i z e t h e w a t e r m a i n s f o r u l t i m a t e de v e l o p m e n t w i t h i n t h e p r o j e c t . T h i s i n c l u d e s d e t a i l e d w a t e r u s a g e a n a l y s i s a n d b u i l d i n g p l a n s fo r P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s W a t e r E n g i n e e r i n g r e v i e w s an d a p p r o v a l i n d e t e r m i n i n g p r o j e c t w a t e r re q u i r e m e n t s a n d a p p r o p r i a t e w a t e r a s s e s s m e n t f e e s . ( 5. 1 1 - 2 ) 10 - 9 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m it o r g r a d i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s i n s t a l l a t i o n o f a s e p a r a t e i r r i g a t i o n m e t e r wh e n t h e t o t a l l a n d s c a p e d a r e a e x c e e d s 2, 5 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t . ( C i t y o f A n a h e i m W a t e r Co n s e r v a t i o n M e a s u r e s ) ( 5. 1 1 - 3 ) 10 - 1 0 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r a d i n g p e r m i t f o l l o w i n g c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f S E I R No . 3 3 4 33 9 , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l c o m p l y w i t h R u l e 1 5 D of t h e W a t e r U t i l i t i e s R a t e s , R u l e s , a n d R e g u l a ti o n s . R u l e 1 5 D s h a l l b e a m e n d e d t o i n c l u d e co n s t r u c t i o n o f a n e w w e l l w i t h a m i n i m u m 1 , 5 0 0 G P M c a p a c i t y w i t h i n T h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e . (5. 1 1 - 4 ) Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 10 - 1 1 O n g o i n g , t h e C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o c o l l a b o r a t e w i t h t h e M e t r o p o l i t a n W a t e r D i s t r i c t o f S o u t h e r n Ca l i f o r n i a , i t s m e m b e r a g e n c i e s , a n d O r a n g e C o un t y W a t e r D i s t r i c t t o e n s u r e t h a t a v a i l a b l e wa t e r s u p p l i e s m e e t a n t i c i p a t e d d e m a n d . I f i t i s f o r e c a s t t h a t w a t e r d e m a n d e x c e e d s a v a i l a b l e su p p l i e s , t h e C i t y s h a l l t r i g g e r a p p l i c a t i o n o f i t s W a t e r C o n s e r v a t i o n O r d i n a n c e , M u n i c i p a l C o d e Se c t i o n 1 0 . 1 8 , a s p r e s c r i b e d , t o r e q u i r e m a n d a t or y c o n s e r v a t i o n m e a s u r e s a s a u t h o r i z e d b y Se c t i o n 1 0 . 1 8 . 0 7 0 t h r o u g h 1 0 . 1 8 . 0 9 0 , a s a p p r o p r i a t e . 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 0 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 10 - 1 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , s u b m i tt e d l a n d s c a p e p l a n s f o r a l l r e s i d e n t i a l , o f f i c e a n d co m m e r c i a l l a n d s c a p i n g s h a l l d e m o n s t r a t e t h e u s e of d r o u g h t t o l e r a n t p l a n t m a t e r i a l s p u r s u a n t to t h e p u b l i c a t i o n e n t i t l e d “ W a t e r U s e E f f i cie n c y o f L a n d s c a p e S p e c i e s ” b y t h e U . C . Co o p e r a t i v e E x t e n s i o n , A u g u s t 2 0 0 0 . 10 - 1 3 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r ad i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s w a t e r e f f i c i e n t d e s i g n f e a t u r e s i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t li m i t e d t o ( a s a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e t y p e o f d e ve l o p m e n t a t i s s u e ) w a t e r l e s s w a t e r h e a t e r s , wa t e r l e s s u r i n a l s , a u t o m a t i c o n a n d o f f w a te r f a c e t s , a n d w a t e r e f f i c i e n t a p p l i a n c e s . 10 - 1 4 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r ad i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s i n s t a l l a t i on o f a s e p a r a t e i r r i g a t i o n l i n e s f o r r e c y c l e d wa t e r . A l l i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s s h a l l b e d e s i g n e d s o t h a t t h e y w i l l f u n c t i o n p r o p e r l y w i t h r e c y c l e d wa t e r . 10 - 1 5 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a p r o j e c t t h a t e x c e e d s t h e s t a t u t o r y t h r e s h o l d s s e t f o r t h i n S B 6 1 0 a n d S B 22 1 , t h e a p p l i c a n t s h a l l d e m o n s t r a t e t o t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r t h a t a d eq u a t e w a t e r s u p p l y e x i s t s t o se r v e t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . I f i t c a n n o t b e d e m o ns t r a t e d t h a t a d e q u a t e w a t e r e x i s t s t o s e r v e th e s p e c i f i c p r o j e c t , t h e p r oj e c t s h a l l n o t b e a p p r o v e d . 10 - 1 6 Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t or g r a d i n g p e r m i t f o l l o w i n g c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f SE I R N o . 3 3 9 , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , D r aw i n g N o s . W - 2 5 2 3 a n d W - 25 2 4 o f W a t e r R u l e 1 5 - D s h a l l b e r e v i s e d , u p d a t e d a n d a m e n d e d t o i n c l u d e a n e w 3 , 0 0 0 g a l l o n p e r m i n u t e w a t e r we l l , r e v i s e d f a c i l i t i e s c o s t s a n d t h e t o t a l G r o ss F l o o r B u i l d i n g A r e a o f t h e P r o j e c t e d T o t a l De v e l o p m e n t o f S E I R N o . 3 3 9 . P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t bu i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r a d i n g p e r m i t fo l l o w i n g c e r t i f i c a t i o n o f S E I R N o . 3 3 9 , w h i c he v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , R u l e 1 5 -D s h a l l b e a m e n d e d t o in c l u d e t h e f o l l o w i n g i m p r o v e m e n t s . • A t r a n s m i s s i o n m a i n i n O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e f r o m S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d t o S R -57 . • A t r a n s m i s s i o n m a i n i n D o u g l a s s A v e n u e f r om K a t e l l a t o t h e A n ah e i m S t a d i u m l o o p . • A t r a n s m i ss i o n m a i n i n S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d f r o m O r a n g e w o o d s o u t h t o t h e C i t y lim i t s . • A t r a n s m i s s i o n m a i n i n t h e L e w i s S t r e e t C o n n e c t o r . • A n e w 3 , 0 0 0 g a l l o n p e r m i n u t e w a t e r w e l l . 5. 1 0 - 3 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d r e s u l t i n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f ne w s t o r m w a t e r d r a i n a g e fa c i l i t i e s . Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t T h e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a ti o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a te d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 10 - 1 7 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r s h a l l r e vi e w t h e l o c a t i o n o f e a ch p r o j e c t t o d e t e r m i n e if i t i s l o c a t e d w i t h i n a n a r e a s e r v e d b y d e f i c i e n t d r a i n a g e f a c i l i t i e s , a s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e P l a t i n u m Tr i a n g l e D r a i n a g e S t u d y Ma s t e r P l a n o f S t o r m D r a i n a g e f o r E a s t G a r d e n G r o v e W i n t e r s b u r g Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 1 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation Ch a n n e l T r i b u t a r y A r e a . I f t h e p r o j e c t w i l l i n c r e a s e st o r m w a t e r f l o w s b e y o n d t h o s e pr o g r a m m e d i n t h e a p p r o p r i a t e m a s t e r p l a n d r a i na g e s t u d y f o r t h e a r e a o r i f t h e p r o j e c t cu r r e n t l y d i s c h a r g e s t o a n e x i s t i n g d e f i c i e n t s t or m d r a i n s y s t e m o r w i l l c r e a t e a d e f i c i e n c y i n an e x i s t i n g s t o r m d r a i n , t h e p r o p er t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e qu i r e d t o g u a r a n t e e m i t i g a t i o n of t h e i m p a c t t o a d e q u a t e l y s e r v e t h e a r e a t o th e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r a n d C i t y At t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d t o i n s t a l l t h e d r a i n a g e fa c i l i t i e s , a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e C i ty E n g i n e e r t o m i t i g a t e t h e i m p a ct s o f t h e p r o p o s e d d e v e l o p m e n t ba s e d u p o n t h e D e v e l o p m e n t M i t i g a t i o n w i t h i n B e n e f i t Z o n e s ( A p p e n d i x E o f t h e P l a t i n u m Tr i a n g l e D r a i n a g e S t u d y ) of t h e M a s t e r P l a n o f S t o r m D r a i n a g e f o r E a s t G a r d e n G r o v e Wi n t e r s b u r g C h a n n e l T r i b u t a r y A r e a , p r i o r t o a c c e p t a n c e f o r m a i n t e n a n c e o f p u b l i c im p r o v e m e n t s b y t h e C i t y o r f i n a l B u i l d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n f o r t h e b u i l d i n g / s t r u c t u r e , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e p r o p er t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e In f r a s t r u c t u r e I m p r o v e m e n t ( F e e ) P r o g r a m , i f a d op t e d f o r t h e P r o j e c t A r e a , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y th e C i t y E n g i n e e r , w h i c h c o u l d i n c l u d e f e e s , cr e d i t s , r e i m b u r s e m e n t s , c o n s t r u c t i o n , o r a co m b i n a t i o n t h e r e o f . ( 5. 5 - 3 ) 5. 1 0 - 4 : E x i s t i n g a n d / o r p r o p o s e d fa c i l i t i e s w o u l d b e a b l e t o ac c o m m o d a t e p r o j e c t - g e n e r a t e d so l i d w a s t e a n d c o m p l y w i t h re l a t e d s o l i d w a s t e r e g u l a t i o n s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 10 - 1 8 Pr i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g in s p e c t i o n s o f e a c h d e v e l o p m e n t , t h e T h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p r o j e c t p l a n s t o t h e St r e e t s a n d S a n i t a t i o n D i v i s i o n o f t h e P u b l i c Wo r k s D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l t o en s u r e t h a t t h e p l a n s co m p l y w i t h A B 9 3 9 , a n d th e S o l i d W a s t e R e d u c t i o n A c t o f 1 9 8 9 , a n d t h e C o u n t y o f O r a n g e a n d C i t y o f A n a h e i m In t e g r a t e d W a s t e M a n a g e m e n t P l a n s a s a d m i n i s t e r ed b y t h e C i t y o f A n ah e i m . I m p l e m e n t a t i o n of s a i d p l a n s h a l l c o m m e n c e u p o n o c c u p a n c y a n d s h a l l r e m a i n i n f u l l e f f e c t a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e St r e e t a n d S a n i t a t i o n D i v i s i o n a n d m a y i n c l u d e , a t i t s d i s c r e t i o n , t h e f o l l o w i n g p l a n co m p o n e n t s : ( 5. 1 1 - 8 ) • De t a i l i n g t h e l o c a t i o n s a n d d e s i g n of o n - s i t e r e c y c l i n g f a c i l i t i e s . • Pr o v i d i n g o n -si t e r e c y c l i n g r e c e p t a c l e s t o e n c o u r a g e r e c y c l i n g . • Pa r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m ’ s “ R e c yc l e A n a h e i m ” p r o g r a m o r o t h e r s u b s t i t u t e pr o g r a m a s m a y b e d e v e l o p e d b y t h e C i t y or g o v e r n i n g a g e n c y . • Fa c i l i t a t i n g c a r d b o a r d r e c y c l i n g ( e s p e c i a l l y in r e t a i l a r e a s ) b y p r o v i d i n g a d e q u a t e sp a c e a n d c e n t r a l i z e d l o c a t i o n s f o r c o l l e c t i o n a n d b a i l i n g . • Pr o v i d i n g t r a s h c o m p a c t o r s f o r n o n r e c y c l a b l e m a t e r i a l s w h e n e v e r f e a s i b l e t o r e d u c e th e t o t a l v o l u m e o f s o l i d w a s t e a n d n u m be r o f t r i p s r e q u i r e d f o r c o l l e c t i o n . • Pr o v i d i n g o n - s i t e r e c y c l i n g r e c e p t a c l e s ac c e s s i b l e t o t h e p u b l i c t o e n c o u r a g e re c y c l i n g f o r a l l b u s i n e s s e s , e m p l o y e e s , a n d p a t r o n s w h e r e f e a s i b l e . Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 2 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation • Pr o h i b i t i n g c u r b s i d e p i c k - u p . • En s u r i n g h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s d i s p o s a l c o m p li e s w i t h f e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d c i t y re g u l a t i o n s . 10 - 1 9 On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n s , th e T h e f o l l o w i n g p r a c t i c e s s h a l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d , a s fe a s i b l e , b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r : ( 5. 1 1 -9 ) • Us a g e o f r e c y c l e d p a p e r p r o d u c t s f o r s t a t i o n e r y , l e t t e r h e a d , a n d p a c k a g i n g . • Re c o v e r y o f m a t e r i a l s , s u c h as a l u m i n u m a n d c a r d b o a r d . • Co l l e c t i o n o f o f f i c e p a p e r f o r r e c y c l i n g . • Co l l e c t i o n o f g l a s s , p l a s t i c s , k i t c h e n g r e a s e , l a s e r p r i n t e r t o n e r c a r t r i d g e s , o i l , ba t t e r i e s , a n d s c r a p m e t a l f o r r e c y c l i n g o r r e c o v e r y . 10 - 2 0 Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f e a c h g r a d i n g p l a n ( f or i m p o r t / e x p o r t p l a n ) a n d p r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f de m o l i t i o n p e r m i t s ( f o r d e m o l i t i o n p l a n s ) , t h e T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a De m o l i t i o n a n d I m p o r t / E x p o r t P l a n s , i f d e t e r m i n e d t o b e n e c e s s a r y b y t h e P u b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t , T r a f f i c E n g i n e e r i n g D i v i si o n a n d / o r S t r e e t a n d S a n i t a ti o n D i v i s i o n . T h e p l a n s s h a l l in c l u d e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f o f f - s i t e l o c a t i o n s f o r ma t e r i a l e x p o r t f r o m t h e p r o j e c t a n d o p t i o n s f o r di s p o s a l o f e x c e s s m a t e r i a l . T h e s e o p t i o n s m a y i n c l u d e r e c y c l i n g o f m a t e r i a l s o n - s i t e , s a l e t o a br o k e r o r c o n t r a c t o r , s a l e t o a p r o j e c t i n t h e v i ci n i t y o r t r a n s p o r t t o a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r e d la n d f i l l , w i t h a t t e m p t s m a d e t o m o v e i t w i t h in O r a n g e C o u n t y . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r sh a l l o f f e r r e c y c l a b l e b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s , s u c h as a s p h a l t o r c o n c r e t e f o r s a l e o r r e m o v a l b y pr i v a t e f i r m s o r p u b l i c a g e n c i e s f o r u s e i n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f o t h e r p r o j e c t s , i f a l l c a n n o t b e r e u s e d on t h e p r o j e c t s i t e . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 0 ) 5. 1 0 - 5 : E x i s t i n g a n d / o r p r o p o s e d fa c i l i t i e s w o u l d b e a b l e t o ac c o m m o d a t e p r o j e c t - g e n e r a t e d el e c t r i c i t y d e m a n d s . Po t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s ur e s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A Th e f o l l o w i n g m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s w e r e i n c l u d e d i n t h e U p d a t e d a n d M o d i f i e d M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g Pr o g r a m N o . 1 0 6 A f o r t h e P l a t i n u m T r ia n g l e , a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l o n O c t o b e r 2 5 , 2 0 0 5 , a s p a r t of t h e S u b s e q u e n t E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t R e p o r t N o . 3 3 2 a n d a r e a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t . Ad d i t i o n s a r e s h o w n i n bo l d a n d d e l e t i o n s a r e i n d i c a t e d i n s t r i k e o u t f o r m a t . T h e m i t i g a t i o n r e f e r e n c e nu m b e r s f r o m M M P N o . 1 0 6 A a r e s h o w n i n ( it a l i c s ). 10 - 2 1 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s s h o w i n g t h a t e a c h s t r u c t u r e w i l l c o m p l y w i t h ex c e e d t h e S t a t e E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y St a n d a r d s f o r N o n r e s i d e n t i a l B u il d i n g s ( T i t l e 2 4 , P a r t 6 , A r t i c l e 2 , C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f Re g u l a t i o n s ) by a m i n i m u m o f 1 0 p e r c e n t an d w i l l c o n s u l t w i t h t h e Ci t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c Ut i l i t i e s R e s o u r c e E f f i c i e n c y De p a r t m e n t B u s i n e s s a n d C o m m u n i t y P r o g r a m s D i v i s i o n . i n or d e r t o r e v i e w T i t l e 2 4 m e a s u r e s i n co r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e p r o j e c t d e s i g n in c l u d i n g e n e r g y ef f i c i e n t de s i g n s . T h i s c o n s u l t a t i o n s h a l l t a k e p l a c e d u r i n g p r o j e c t d e s i g n in o r d e r to re v i e w Ti t l e 2 4 m e a s u r e s t h a t a r e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e p r o j e c t d e s i g n e n e r g y ef f i c i e n t p r a c t i c e s ef f i c i e n c y a n d a l l o w p o t e n t i a l s y s t e m s a l t e r n a t i v e s s u c h a s t h er m a l e n e r g y s t o r a g e a i r - co n d i t i o n i n g , li g h t i n g , a n d b u i l d i n g e n v e l o p e o p t i o n s . P l a n s s u b m i t t e d f o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s s h a l l sh o w t h e p r o p o s e d e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c i e s a n d s y s t e m s a l t e r n a t i v e s . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 1 ) Less than significant 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 3 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 10 - 2 2 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e of e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , I n o r d e r t o c o n s e r v e e n e r g y , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s i m p l e m e n t e n e r g y - s a v i n g p r a c t i c e s th a t w i l l b e im p l e m e n t e d w i t h t h e p r o j e c t i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h T i t l e 1 0 24 , w h i c h m a y i n c l u d e t h e fo l l o w i n g : • Hi g h - e f f i c i e n c y a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g w i t h E M S ( c o m p u t e r ) c o n t r o l . • Va r i a b l e A i r V o l u m e ( V A V ) a i r d i s t r i b u t i o n . • Ou t s i d e a i r ( 1 0 0 p e r c e n t) e c o n o m i z e r c y c l e . • St a g e d c o m p r e s s o r s o r v a r i a b l e s p e e d d r iv e s t o f l o w v a r y i n g t h e r m a l l o a d s . • Is o l a t e d H V A C z o n e c o n t r o l b y fl o o r s / s e p a r a b l e a c t i v i t y a r e a s . • Sp e c i f i c a t i o n o f p r e m i u m - e f f i c i e n c y e l e c t r ic m o t o r s ( i . e . , c o mp r e s s o r m o t o r s , a i r - ha n d l i n g u n i t s , a n d f a n - c o i l u n i t s ) . • Us e o f o c c u p a n c y s e n s o r s i n a p p r o p r i a t e s p a c e s . • Us e o f c o m p a c t f l u o r e s c e n t l a m p s i n p l a c e o f i n c a n d e s c e n t l a m p s . • Us e o f c o l d c a t h o d e f l u o r e s c e n t l a m p s . • Us e o f E n e r g y S t a r ® e x i t li g h t i n g o r e x i t s i g n a g e . • Us e o f T - 8 l a m p s a n d e l e c t r o n i c b a l l a s t s w h er e a p p l i c a t i o n s o f s t a n d a r d f l u o r e s c e n t fix t u r e s a r e i d e n t i f i e d . • Us e o f li g h t i n g p o w e r c o n t r o l l e r s i n a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h m e t a l - h a l i d e o r h i g h - p r e s s u r e so d i u m ( h i g h i n t e n s i t y d i s c h a r g e ) l a m p s f o r o u t d o o r l i g h t i n g a n d p a r k i n g l o t s . • Co n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e r m a l e n e r g y s t o r a g e a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g f o r sp a c e s o r h o t e l bu i l d i n g s , m e e t i n g f a c i l i t i e s , t h e a t e r s , o r o t h e r i n t e r m i t t e n t -us e s p a c e s o r f a c i l i t i e s th a t m a y r e q u i r e a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g d u r i n g s u m m e r , d a y - p e a k p e r i o d s . • Co n s i d e r a t i o n f o r p a r t i c i p a t io n i n R e s o u r c e E f f i c i e n c y ’s Ad v a n t a g e S e r v i c e s Pr o g r a m s s u c h a s : ƒ Ne w c o n s t r u c t i o n d e s i g n r e v i e w , i n w h i c h t h e C i t y c o s t - s h a r e s e n g i n e e r i n g f e e s fo r u p t o $1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 f o r d e s i g n o f e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t b u i l d i n g s a n d s y s t e m s . ƒ Ne w C o n s t r u c t i o n – Ca s h i n c e n t i v e s $ 4 0 0 p e r k W o r $ 0 . 1 5 p e r k W h s a v e d fo r e a c h m e a s u r e a n d u p to $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 p e r f a c i l i t y f o r ef f i c i e n c y t h a t e x c e e d Ti t l e 2 4 r e q u i r e m e n t s . ƒ En e r g y S a l e f o r N e w C o n s t r u c t i o n – C a s h i n c e n t i v e s ( $ 1 5 0 30 0 to $ 4 0 0 p e r k W re d u c t i o n i n l o a d ) f o r e f f i c i e n c y th a t e x c e e d s T i t l e 2 4 r e q u i r e m e n t s . ƒ Gr e e n B u i l d i n g P r o g r a m – O f f e r s a cc e l e r a t e d p l a n a p p r o v a l , f i n a n c i a l in c e n t i v e s , w a i v e d p l a n c h e c k f e e s a n d f r e e t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e . ƒ Th e r m a l E n e r g y S t o r a g e F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y – Co s t s h a r i n g o f u p t o $ 5 , 0 0 0 f o r t h e fe a s i b i l i t y s t u d y o f T E S a p p l i e d t o n e w f a c i l i t i e s . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 2 ) • Us e o f h i g h e f f i c i e n c y t o i l e t s ( 1 . 2 8 g a l l o n s p e r f l u s h [ g p f ] o r l e s s ) . • Us e o f z e r o t o l o w w a t e r u s e u r i n a l s ( 0 . 0 g p f t o 0 . 2 5 g p f ) . • Us e o f w e a t h e r - b a s e d i rr i g a t i o n c o n t r o l l e r s f o r o u t d o o r i r r i g a t i o n . • Us e o f d r a u g h t - t o l e r a n t a n d n a t i v e p l a n t s i n o u t d o o r l a n d s c a p i n g . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 2 ) 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 4 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 10 - 2 3 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d in g p e r m i t o r g r a d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , F o r a n y bu i l d i n g s r e q u i r i n g a c h a n g e i n e l e c t r i c a l s e r v i c e , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n s t a l l th e i r p o r t i o n o f t h e a n u n d e r g r o u n d e l e c t r i c a l s e r v i c e f r o m t h e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D i s t r i b u t i o n Sy s t e m a s d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t . T h e U n d e r g r o u n d Se r v i c e w i l l b e i n s t a l l e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e Ele c t r i c R u l e s , R a t e s , R e g u l a t i o n s a n d E l e c t r i c a l Sp e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r of Un d e r g r o u n d S y s t e m s . E l e c t r i c a l S e r v i c e F e e s se r v i c e f e e s a n d o t h e r ap p l i c a b l e f e e s w i l l b e a s s e s s e d i n a c c o r d a n c e wi t h t h e E l e c t r i c R u l e s, R a t e s , R e g u l a t i o n s or an o t h e r f i n a n c i a l m e c h a n i s m a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y a n d E l e c t r i c a l S p e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r U n d e r g r o u n d Sy s t e m s . T h e u n d e r g r o u n d e l e c t r i c a l se r v i c e w i l l c o n s i s t o f t h e f o ll o w i n g i m p r o v e m en t s t o t h e cu r r e n t e l e c t r i c f a c i l i t i e s : ( 5. 1 1 - 1 3 ) • Re l o c a t e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a E d i s o n t r a n s m i s s i o n l i n e u n d e r g r o u n d o n K a t e l l a Av e n u e f r o m w e s t o f t h e U n i o n P a c i f i c Ra i l r o a d t o L e w i s S t r e e t ( 8 5 0 f e e t ) . • Re l o c a t e S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a E d i s o n c o m m u n i c a t i o n l i n e u n d e r g r o u n d o n K a t e l l a Av e n u e f r o m L e w i s S t r e e t t o e a s t o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d ( 2 , 4 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n K a t e l l a A v en u e f r o m L e w i s S t r e e t t o 7 0 0 f e e t w e s t o f St a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d ( 2 , 4 0 0 f e e t ) . • Re l o c a t e d i s t r i b u t i o n c i r c u i t s u n d e r g r o u n d on K a t e l l a A v e n u e f r o m L e w i s S t r e e t t o 70 0 f e e t w e s t o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d ( 2 , 4 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e f r o m A n a h e i m W a y t o S t a t e Co l l e g e B o u l e v a r d ( 1 , 5 0 0 f e e t ) . • Re l o c a t i o n a d i s t r i b u t i o n c i r c u i t u n d e r g r ou n d o n O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e f r o m S t a t e Co l l e g e B o u l e v a r d t o w e s t o f t h e S a n t a A n a R i v e r ( 1 , 6 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n G e n e A u t r y W a y f r o m I - 5 t o S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d (2 , 5 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n A n a h e i m W a y f r o m 7 0 0 f e e t n o r t h o f K a t e l l a A v e n u e to O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e ( 3 , 4 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n L e w i s S t r ee t f r o m K a t e l l a A v e n u e t o G e n e A u t r y W a y (9 5 0 f e e t ) . • Re l o c a t e a d i s t r i b u t i o n c i r c u i t u n d e r g r o u n d o n D o u g l a s S t r e e t f r o m K a t e l l a A v e n u e t o Ce r r i t o s A v e n u e ( 1 , 0 0 0 f e e t ) . 10 - 2 4 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e of e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l w h i c h s h all e n s u r e t h a t b u i l d i n g s a r e i n c o n f or m a n c e w i t h ex c e e d th e S t a t e E n e r g y C o n s e r v a t i o n Ef f i c i e n c y S t a n d a r d s f o r N o n r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s ( T i t l e 24 , P a r t 6 , A r t i c l e 2 , C a l i f o r n i a A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C o d e ) by a m i n i m u m o f 1 0 p e r c e n t . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 4 ) 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 5 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation Ad d i t i o n a l M i t i g a t i o n 10 - 2 5 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r gr a d i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n s t a l l t h e i r p o r t i o n o f t h e un d e r g r o u n d e l e c t r i c a l s e r v i c e f r o m t h e P u b l i c Ut i l i t i e s D i s t r i b u t i o n S y s t e m a s d e t e r m i n e d b y th e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t . Th e U n d e r g r o u n d S e r v i c e w i l l b e i n s t a l l e d i n a cc o r d a n c e w i t h t h e E l e c t r i c R u l e s , R a t e s , Re g u l a t i o n s a n d E l e c t r i c a l S p e c i f i c a t i o n s o f U n de r g r o u n d S y s t e m s . E l e c t r i c a l s e r v i c e f e e s a n d ot h e r a p p l i c a b l e f e e s w i l l b e a s s e s s e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e E l e c t r i c R u l e s , R a t e s , Re g u l a t i o n s o r a n o t h e r f i n a n c i a l m e c h a n i s m a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y . T h e u n d e r g r o u n d e l e c t r i c a l se r v i c e w i l l c o n s i s t o f t h e f o l l o w i n g i m p r o v e m en t s t o t h e c u r r e n t e l e c t r i c f a c i l i t i e s : • Tw o n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k s o n K a t e ll a A v e n u e f r o m A n a h e i m W a y t o L e w i s St r e e t ( 8 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n K a t e l l a A v e n u e f r o m D o u g l a s R o a d t o H o w e l l Av e n u e ( 2 , 0 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d f r o m C e r r i t o s A v e n u e t o Ka t e l l a A v e n u e ( 2 , 6 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e f r o m I - 5 t o t h e S a n t a A n a R i v e r (4 , 8 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n G e n e A u t r y W a y f r o m H a s t e r S t r e e t t o t h e e a s t s i d e of I - 5 ( 2 , 5 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n G e n e A u t r y W a y f r o m I - 5 t o S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d (2 , 5 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w t r a n s m i s s i o n d u c t b a n k o n A n a h e i m W a y f r o m 7 0 0 f e e t n o r t h o f K a t e l l a Av e n u e t o O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e ( 3 , 4 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w t r a n s m i s s i o n d u c t b a n k o n L e w i s S t r e e t a n d S a n t a C r u z S t r e e t f r o m K a t e l l a Av e n u e t o O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e ( 3 , 0 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n t h e e a s t sid e o f t h e A n g e l S t a d iu m p a r k i n g l o t f r o m Or a n g e w o o d A v e n u e t o th e S R - 5 7 ( 2 , 0 0 0 f e e t ) . • A n e w d i s t r i b u t i o n d u c t b a n k o n D o u g l a s R o a d f r o m S R - 5 7 t o C e r r i t o s A v e n u e (4 , 0 0 0 f e e t ) . 10 - 2 6 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r a d i n g p e r m i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l pr o v i d e a n e l e c t r i c a l l o a d a n a l y s i s t o t h e C i t y of A n a h e i m P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t ( A P U D ) . Th e a n a l y s i s s h a l l i n c l u d e a l o a d s c h e d u l e a n d m a x i m u m e l e c t r i c al c o i n c i d e n t d e m a n d . S h o u l d th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s l o a d a n a l y s i s r e s u l t i n a c o n t r i b u t e d l o a d f o r e c a s t e d t o e x c e e d 20 M V A a b o v e t h e e x i s t i n g 4 0 M V A c a p a c i t y o f t h e e l e c t r i c a l s y s t e m c u r r e n t l y s e r v i n g t h e Pla t i n u m T r i a n g l e a r e a , t h e A P U D w i l l i n i t i a t e c o n s tr u c t i o n o f a n e w e l e c t r ic a l s u b s t a t i o n w i t h i n th e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e p r o j e c t a r e a . E l e c t r i c a l se r v i c e f e e s a n d o t h e r a p p l i c a b l e f e e s f o r t h e 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 6 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation ele c t r i c a l s u b s t a t i o n w i l l b e a s s e s s e d i n a c c o r d a n ce w i t h t h e E l e c t r i c R u le s , R a t e s , R e g u l a t i o n s or a n o t h e r f i n a n c i a l m e c h a n i s m a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y . 5. 1 0 - 6 : E x i s t i n g a n d / o r p r o p o s e d fa c i l i t i e s w o u l d b e a b l e t o ac c o m m o d a t e p r o j e c t - g e n e r a t e d na t u r a l G a s d e m a n d s . Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t 1 0 - 2 7 T h e C i ty s h a l l c o o r d i n a t e a l l f u t u r e s t r e e t a n d i n f r as t r u c t u r e i m p r o v e m e n t s w i t h i n t h e P l a t i n u m Tr i a n g l e w i t h o t h e r s e r v i c e p r o v i d e r s , i n c l u d in g S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a G a s C o m p a n y a n d t h e Or a n g e C o u n t y S a n i t a t i o n D i s t r i c t s o t h a t r e q u ir e d i n f r a s t r u c t u r e u p g r ad e s m a y b e c o n s t r u c t e d co n c u r r e n t l y . Less than significant 5. 1 1 G R E E N H O U S E G A S E M I S S I O N S 5. 1 1 - 1 : T h e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t wo u l d g e n e r a t e s u b s t a n t i a l l y m o r e gr e e n h o u s e g a s e m i s s i o n s co m p a r e d t o t h e A d o p t e d M a s t e r La n d U s e P l a n a n d c u m u l a t i v e l y co n t r i b u t e t o c l i m a t e c h a n g e im p a c t s i n C a l i f o r n i a . H o w e v e r , th e P r o p o s e d P r o j e c t w o u l d b e co n s i s t e n t s t a t e w i d e a n d r e g i o n a l gr e e n h o u s e g a s r e d u c t i o n s g o a l s . Po t e n t i a l l y S i g n i f i c a n t Ap p l i c a b l e M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s f r o m O t h e r E I R S e c t i o n s Be l o w i s a l i s t o f m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r es i n c l u d e d i n o t h e r e n v i r o n m e n t a l t o p i c a l s e c t i o n s o f t h i s E I R t h a t al s o w o u l d r e d u c e G H G e m i s s i o n s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e p r o j e c t a n d a r e c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e C a l i f o r n i a At t o r n e y G e n e r a l ’ s m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s f o r e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y , r e n e w a b l e e n e r g y a n d s t o r a g e , w a t e r co n s e r v a t i o n a n d e f f i c i e n c y , s o l i d w a s t e , l a n d u s e , t r a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d m o t o r v e h i c l e , a n d a g r i c u l t u r e an d f o r e s t r y m e a s u r e s . I t s h o u l d a l s o b e n o t e d t h a t t h e p r o p o s e d p r o j e c t i s a m i x e d - u s e i n f i l l p r o j e c t th a t i s c o n s i s t e n t w i t h t h e A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l ’ s r e c o mm e n d e d m e a s u r e s f o r l a n d u s e . I n a d d i t i o n , s e v e r a l of t h e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s i n c o r p o r a t e s e v e r a l c a te g o r i e s o f t h e C a l i f o r n i a A t t o r n e y G e n e r a l ’ s re c o m m e n d e d m e a s u r e s ( i . e . , e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y a n d w a t e r e f f i c i e n c y m e a s u r e s a r e o c c a s i o n a l l y in c o r p o r a t e d i n t h e s a m e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e ) . So l i d W a s t e M e a s u r e s 2- 3 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f e a c h gr a d i n g p l a n ( f o r I m p o rt / E x p o r t P l a n ) a n d p r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f de m o l i t i o n p e r m i t s ( f o r D e m o l i t i o n P l a n s ) , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t De m o l i t i o n a n d I m p o r t / E x p o r t P l a n s de t a i l i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d de m o l i t i o n ( C & D ) r e c y c l i n g an d w a s t e r e d u c t i o n m e a s u r e s t o b e im p l e m e n t e d t o r e c o v e r C & D m a t e r i a l s . T h e s e p l a n s sh a l l i n c l u d e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f o ff - s i t e l o c a t i o n s f o r m a t e r i a l s e x p o rt f r o m t h e p r o j e c t a n d o p t i o n s fo r d i s p o s a l o f e x c e s s m a t e r i a l . T h e s e o p t i o n s m a y i n c l u d e r e c y c l i n g o f m a t e r i a l s o n - s i t e o r t o an a d j a c e n t s i t e , s a l e t o a s o i l b r o k e r o r c o n t r a c t or , s a l e t o a p r o j e c t i n t h e v i c i n i t y o r t r a n s p o r t to a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r e d l a nd f i l l , w i t h a t t e m p t s m a d e t o mo v e i t w i t h i n O r a n g e C o u n t y . Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l o f f e r r e c y c l a b le b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s , s u c h a s a s p h a l t o r co n c r e t e f o r s a l e o r r e m o v a l b y p r i v a t e f i r m s o r p u b l i c a g e n c i e s f o r u s e i n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f o t h e r pr o j e c t s i f n o t a l l c a n b e r e u s e d a t t h e p r o j e c t s i t e . ( 5. 2 - 3 ) 10 - 1 8 Pr i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g in s p e c t i o n s o f e a c h d e v e l o p m e n t , t h e T h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p r o j e c t p l a n s t o t h e St r e e t s a n d S a n i t a t i o n D i v i s i o n o f t h e P u b l i c Wo r k s D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l t o e n su r e t h a t t h e p l a n s c o mp l y w i t h A B 9 3 9 , a n d th e S o l i d W a s t e R e d u c t i o n A c t o f 1 9 8 9 , a n d t h e C o u n t y o f O r a n g e a n d C i t y o f A n a h e i m In t e g r a t e d W a s t e M a n a g e m e n t P l a n s a s a d m i n i s t e r ed b y t h e C i t y o f A n ah e i m . I m p l e m e n t a t i o n of s a i d p l a n s h a l l c o m m e n c e u p o n o c c u p a n c y a n d s h a l l r e m a i n i n f u l l e f f e c t a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e St r e e t a n d S a n i t a t i o n D i v i s i o n a n d m a y i n c l u d e , a t i t s d i s c r e t i o n , t h e f o l l o w i n g p l a n co m p o n e n t s : ( 5. 1 1 - 8 ) Significant and Unavoidable 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 7 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation • De t a i l i n g t h e l o c a t i o n s a n d d e s i g n of o n - s i t e r e c y c l i n g f a c i l i t i e s . • Pr o v i d i n g o n -si t e r e c y c l i n g r e c e p t a c l e s t o e n c o u r a g e r e c y c l i n g . • Pa r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m ’ s “ R e c yc l e A n a h e i m ” p r o g r a m o r o t h e r s u b s t i t u t e pr o g r a m a s m a y b e d e v e l o p e d b y t h e C i t y or g o v e r n i n g a g e n c y . • Fa c i l i t a t i n g c a r d b o a r d r e c y c l i n g ( e s p e c i a l l y in r e t a i l a r e a s ) b y p r o v i d i n g a d e q u a t e sp a c e a n d c e n t r a l i z e d l o c a t i o n s f o r c o l l e c t i o n a n d b a i l i n g . • Pr o v i d i n g t r a s h c o m p a c t o r s f o r n o n r e c y c l a b l e m a t e r i a l s w h e n e v e r f e a s i b l e t o r e d u c e th e t o t a l v o l u m e o f s o l i d w a s t e a n d n u m be r o f t r i p s r e q u i r e d f o r c o l l e c t i o n • Pr o v i d i n g o n - s i t e r e c y c l i n g r e c e p t a c l e s ac c e s s i b l e t o t h e p u b l i c t o e n c o u r a g e re c y c l i n g f o r a l l b u s i n e s s e s , e m p l o y e e s , a n d p a t r o n s w h e r e f e a s i b l e . • Pr o h i b i t i n g c u r b s i d e p i c k - u p . • En s u r i n g h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l s d i s p o s a l c o m p li e s w i t h f e d e r a l , s t a t e , a n d c i t y re g u l a t i o n s . 10 - 1 9 On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n s , th e T h e f o l l o w i n g p r a c t i c e s s h a l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d , a s fe a s i b l e , b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r : ( 5. 1 1 - 9 ) • Us a g e o f r e c y c l e d p a p e r p r o d u c t s f o r s t a t i o n e r y , l e t t e r h e a d , a n d p a c k a g i n g . • Re c o v e r y o f m a t e r i a l s , s u c h as a l u m i n u m a n d c a r d b o a r d . • Co l l e c t i o n o f o f f i c e p a p e r f o r r e c y c l i n g . • Co l l e c t i o n o f g l a s s , p l a s t i c s , k i t c h e n g r e a s e , l a s e r p r i n t e r t o n e r c a r t r i d g e s , o i l , ba t t e r i e s , a n d s c r a p m e t a l f o r r e c y c l i n g o r r e c o v e r y . 10 - 2 0 Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f e a c h g r a d i n g p l a n ( f or i m p o r t / e x p o r t p l a n ) a n d p r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f de m o l i t i o n p e r m i t s ( f o r d e m o l i t i o n p l a n s ) , t h e T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a De m o l i t i o n a n d I m p o r t / E x p o r t P l an s , i f d e t e r m i n e d t o b e n e c e s s a r y b y t h e P u b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t , T r a f f i c E n g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n , a n d / o r S t r e e t a n d S a n i t a t i on D i v i s i o n . T h e p l a n s s h a l l in c l u d e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f o f f - s i t e l o c a t i o n s f o r ma t e r i a l e x p o r t f r o m t h e p r o j e c t a n d o p t i o n s f o r di s p o s a l o f e x c e s s m a t e r i a l . T h e s e o p t i o n s m a y i n c l u d e r e c y c l i n g o f m a t e r i a l s o n - s i t e , s a l e t o a br o k e r o r c o n t r a c t o r , s a l e t o a p r o j e c t i n t h e v i ci n i t y o r t r a n s p o r t t o a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r e d la n d f i l l , w i t h a t t e m p t s m a d e t o m o v e i t w i t h in O r a n g e C o u n t y . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r sh a l l o f f e r r e c y c l a b l e b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s , s u c h as a s p h a l t o r c o n c r e t e f o r s a l e o r r e m o v a l b y pr i v a t e f i r m s o r p u b l i c a g e n c i e s f o r u s e i n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f o t h e r p r o j e c t s , i f a l l c a n n o t b e r e u s e d on t h e p r o j e c t s i t e . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 0 ) Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n a n d M o t o r V e h i c l e M e a s u r e s 2- 5 I n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e t i m i n g r e q u i r e d b y t h e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n sp o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r , b u t n o l a t e r th a n p r i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l B u il d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l im p l e m e n t th e f o l l o w i n g m e a s u r e s t o r e d u ce l o n g - t e r m o p e r a t i o n a l C O , N O X , R O G , a n d P M 10 em i s s i o n s : ( 5. 2 - 5 ) • Tr a f f i c l a n e i m p r o v e m e n t s a n d s i gn a l i z a t i o n a s o u t l i n e d i n t h e Pl a t i n u m T r i a n g l e Ma s t e r L a n d U s e P l a n D r a f t T r a f f i c S t u d y R e p o r t b y P a r s o n s B r i n c k e r h o f f , A u g u s t 20 1 0 , tr a f f i c s t u d y a n d Ma s t e r P l a n o f A r t e r i a l H i g h w a y s ( M P A H ) s h a l l b e 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 8 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation im p l e m e n t e d a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e T r af f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r . • Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / c o n t r a c t o r s h a l l p l a c e b u s b e n c h e s a n d / o r s h e l t e r s a s r e q u i r e d by t h e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r a t l o c a t i o n s a l o n g a n y s i t e f r o n t a g e r o u t e s as n e e d e d . 9- 1 Pr i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n sp e c t i o n f o r e a c h b u i l d in g w i t h c o m m e r c i a l , of f i c e , a n d / o r i n s t i t u t i o n a l u s e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l r e c o r d a c o v e n a n t o n th e p r o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g t h a t o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , T t he p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t a n d a d m i n i s t er a c o m p r e h e n s i v e T r a n s p o r t a t i o n D e m a n d Ma n a g e m e n t ( T D M ) p r o g r a m f o r a l l e m p l o y e e s . Th e f o r m o f t h e c o v e n a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d by t h e C i t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e . Ob j e c t i v e s o f t h e T D M p r o g r a m s h a l l b e : ( 5. 1 0 - 2 ) • In c r e a s e r i d e s h a r i n g a n d u s e o f a l t e r n at i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s b y g u e s t s . • Pr o v i d e a m e n u o f c o m m u t e a l t e r n a t i v e s f o r e m p l o y e e s t o r e d u c e p r o j e c t - g e n e r a t e d tr i p s . • Co n d u c t a n a n n u a l c o m m u t e r s u r v e y t o a s c e rt a i n t r i p g e n e r a t i o n , t r i p o r i g i n , a n d Av e r a g e V e h i c l e R i d e r s h i p . 9- 2 P r i o r t o th e f i r s t F i n a l B u i l d i n g a n d Z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n fo r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h c o m m e r c i a l , of f i c e , o r i n s t i t u t i o n a l u s e s , a n d o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e to t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w an d a p p r o v a l a m e n u o f T D M p r o g r a m s t r a t e g i e s a n d e l em e n t s f o r b o t h e x i s t i n g a n d f u t u r e em p l o y e e s ’ c o m m u t e o p t i o n s , t o i n c l ud e , b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o , t h e li s t b e l o w . T h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l a l s o r e c o rd a c o v e n a n t o n t h e p r o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g t h a t t h e a p p r o v e d TD M s t r a t e g i e s a n d e l e m e n t s b e i m p l e m e n t e d on g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n . T h e f o r m of t h e c o v e n a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i ty A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o r e c o r d a t i o n . fo l l o w i n g : ( 5. 1 0 - 2 ) • On - s i t e s e r v i c e s s u c h a s t h e f o o d , r e ta i l , a n d o t h e r s e r v i c e s b e p r o v i d e d . • Ri d e s h a r i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g o f a l l e m p l o y e e m e m b e r s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f pr o v i d i n g a “ m a t c h i n g ” o f e m p l o y e e s w i t h o t h e r e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e i n t h e s a m e ge o g r a p h i c a r e a s a n d w h o c o u l d r i d e s h a r e . • Va n p o o l i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g of a l l e m p l o y e e s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f ma t c h i n g n u m b e r s o f e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e i n g e o g r a p h i c p r o x i m i t y t o o n e a n o t h e r an d c o u l d c o m p r i s e a v a n p o o l o r p a r t i c i p at e i n t h e e x i s t i n g v a n p o o l p r o g r a m s . • Tr a n s i t P a s s . S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a R a p i d T r a n s i t D i s t r i c t a n d O r a n g e C o u n t y Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( i n c l u d i n g c o mm u t e r a i l ) p a s s e s b e p r o m o t e d t h r o u g h fin a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e a n d o n - s i t e s a l e s t o e n c o u r a g e e m p l o y e e s t o u s e t h e v a r i o u s tr a n s i t a n d b u s s e r v i c e s f r om t h r o u g h o u t t h e r e g i o n . • Sh u t t l e S e r v i c e . A c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g o f a l l e m plo y e e s l i v i n g i n p r o x i m i t y t o t h e p r o j e c t be g e n e r a t e d , a n d a l o c a l s h u t t l e p r o g r a m of f e r e d t o e n c o u r a g e e m p l o y e e s t o t r a v e l to w o r k b y m e a n s o t h e r t h a n t h e a u t o m o b i le . E v e n t s h u t t l e s e r v i c e w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e fo r t h e g u e s t s . • Bi c y c l i n g . A B i c y c l i n g P r o g r a m b e d e v e l o p e d t o o f f e r a b i c y c l i n g a l t e r n a t i v e t o em p l o y e e s . S e c u r e b i c y c l e r a c k s, l o c k e r s , a n d s h o w e r s b e pr o v i d e d a s p a r t o f t h i s pr o g r a m , M a p s o f b i c y c l e r o u t e s t h r o u g h o u t th e a r e a b e p r o v i d e d t o i n f o r m p o t e n t i a l 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 3 9 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation bi cy c li st s o f t h es e op t i on s . • Gu a r a n t e e d R i d e H o m e P r o g r a m . A p r o g r a m to p r o v i d e e m p l o y e e s wh o r i d e s h a r e , o r us e t r a n s i t o r o t h e r m e a n s o f c o m m u t i n g t o wo r k , w i t h a p r e a r r a n g e d r i d e h o m e i n a ta x i , r e n t a l c a r , s h u t t l e , o r o t h e r v e h i c l e , in t h e e v e n t o f e m e r g e n c i e s d u r i n g t h e w o r k sh i f t . • Ta r g e t R e d u c t i o n o f L o n g e s t C o m m u t e T r i p . A n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m f o r r i d e s h a r i n g an d o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s to p u t h i g h e s t p r i o r i t y o n r e d u c t i o n o f lo n g e s t e m p l o y e e c o m m u t e t r i p s . • St a g g e r w o r k s h i f t s . • De v e l o p a “ c o m p r e s s e d w o r k w e e k ” p r o g r a m, w h i c h p r o v i d e s f o r f e w e r w o r k d a y s bu t l o n g e r d a i l y s h i f t s a s a n o p t i o n f o r e m p l o y e e s . • Ex p l o r e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f a “ t e l e c o m m u tin g ” p r o g r a m t h a t w o u l d l i n k s o m e em p l o y e e s v i a e l e c t r o n i c m e a n s (e . g . , c o m p u t e r w i t h m o d e m ) . • De v e l o p a p a r k i n g m a n a g e m e n t p r o g r a m t h at p r o v i d e s i n c e n t iv e s t o t h o s e w h o ri d e s h a r e o r u s e t r a n s i t m e a n s o t h e r t h a n sin g l e - o c c u p a n t a u t o t o t r a v e l t o w o r k . • Ac c e s s . P r e f e r e n t i a l a c c e s s t o h i g h o c c u p a n c y v e h i c l e s a n d s h u t t l e s m a y b e pr o v i d e d . • Fi n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r R i d e s h a r i n g a n d / o r Pu b l i c T r a n s i t . ( C u r r e n t l y , f e d e r a l l a w pr o v i d e s t a x - f r e e s t a t u s f o r u p t o $ 6 5 pe r m o n t h p e r e m p l o y e e c o n t r i b u t i o n s t o em p l o y e e s w h o v a n p o o l o r u s e p u b l i c t r a n s i t i n c l u d i n g c o m m u t e r r a i l a n d / o r e x p r e s s bu s p o o l s . ) • Fi n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r B i c y c l i n g . E m p l o y e e s o f f e r e d f i n a n c i a l i n c e n t i v e s f o r b i c y c l i n g to w o r k . • Sp e c i a l “ P r e m i u m ” f o r t h e P a r t i c i p a t i o n a n d P r o m o t i o n o f T r i p R e d u c t i o n . Tic k e t / p a s s e s t o s p e c i a l e v e n t s , v a c a t i o n , et c . b e o f f e r e d t o e m p l o y e e s w h o r e c r u i t ot h e r e m p l o y e e s f o r v a n p o o l , c a r p o o l , o r o t h e r t r i p r e d u c t i o n p r o g r a m s . • De s i g n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m s f o r c a r p o o l i n g an d o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s so a s t o p u t h i g h e s t p r io r i t y o n r e d u c t i o n o f lo n g e s t c o m m u t e t r i p s . E v e r y p r o p e r t y o w n e r a n d / o r l e s s e e s h a l l de s i g n a t e a n o n - s i t e c o n t a c t w h o w i l l b e re s p o n s i b l e f o r c o o r d i n a t i n g w i t h t h e A T N a n d im p l e m e n t i n g a l l t r i p m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s . Th e o n - s i t e c o o r d i n a t o r s h a l l b e t h e o n e p o i n t of c o n t a c t r e p r e s e n t i n g t h e p r o j e c t w i t h t h e AT N . T h e T D M r e q u i r e m e n t s s h a l l b e i n c l u d e d in t h e l e a s e o r o t h e r a g r e e m e n t w i t h a l l o f th e p r o j e c t p a r t i c i p a n t s . 9 -17 Pr i o r t o th e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g w i t h o f f i c e a n d / o r co m m e r c i a l u s e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p r o o f t o t h e P u b l i c W o r k s , T r a n s i t Pla n n i n g D i v i s i o n t h a t t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r h a s e n t e r e d i n t o a n a g r e e me n t w i t h t h e An a h e i m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n N e t w o r k ( A T N ) f o r t h e p r ov i s i o n o f a t r a n s i t s h u t t l e s e r v i c e b e t w e e n th e p r o j e c t , t h e e x i s t i n g M e t r o l i n k S t a t i o n an d f u t u r e A n a h e i m R e g i on a l T r a n s p o r t a t i o n In t e r m o d a l C e n t e r ( A R T I C ) a s w e l l a s m a j o r a c t i v i t y c e n t e r s i n be t w e e n . T h e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l be r e c o r d e d i n t h e O f f i c i a l R e c o r d s o f t h e Of f i c e o f t h e C o u n t y R e c o r d e r , O r a n g e C o u n t y , Ca l i f o r n i a . T h e f o r m o f t h e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l b e a pp r o v e d b y t h e C i t y A t t o rn e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 4 0 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation re c o r d at i on . T h e ag r e e m e n t s h a ll pr o v id e f o r t h e f o ll ow i ng : a. A s h u t t l e r o u t e p l a n , a p p r o v e d b y t h e P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t , T r a n s i t P l a n n i n g Di v i s i o n a n d A T N , s h a l l b e at t a c h e d a n d i n c o r p o r a t e d i n to t h e a g r e e m e n t . T h e p l a n sh a l l i n c l u d e c o -lo c a t i o n o f s t o p s w i t h O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o ri t y b u s st o p l o c a t i o n s a n d o t h e r p r o p e r t i e s i n t h e P l a t i n u m T r i a n g l e w h e r e f e a s i b l e a n d de t e r m i n e d a p p r o p r i a t e b y t h e P u b l i c W o r ks T r a n s i t P l a n n i n g D i v i s i o n a n d A T N . T h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y a l l c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e p r e p a r a t i o n o f t h e s hu t t l e r o u t e p l a n . b. Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e t h e f u l l c o s t a s s o c i a t e d w i t h p r o v i d i n g t h e sh u t t l e , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , p u rc h a s i n g t h e s h u t t l e v e h i c l e a n d a l l c o s t s as s o c i a t e d w i t h o p e r a t i n g a n d m a r k e t i n g t h e s h u t t l e r o u t e . c. Th e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l p r o v i d e a m e c h a n i s m f o r th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o r e q u e s t fa i r s h a r e p a r t i c i p a t i o n f r o m o t h e r m a j o r a c t i vi t y c e n t e r s t o b e s e r v e d b y t h i s s h u t t l e ro u t e . T h e m e c h a n i s m s h a l l b e s u b j ec t t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e A T N . d. Th e a g r e e m e n t s ha l l s e t f o r t h a s c h e d u l e f o r c o m m e n c e m e n t o f o p e r a t i o n o f t h e s h u t t l e se r v i c e . e. Th e a g r e e m e n t s h a l l p r o v i d e t h a t t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r' s o b l i g a t i o n s t o f u n d t h e sh u t t l e s e r v i c e m a y b e c a n c e l l e d o n l y u p o n p r i o r w r i t t e n a p p r o v a l f r o m t h e P u b l i c Wo r ks D e p a r t m e n t , T r a n s i t P l a n n i n g D i v i s i o n ' s o n c e a n e w t r a n s i t s e r v i c e h a s t a k e n i t s pl a c e . f. Th a t t o t h e e x t e n t p e r m i t t e d b y l a w t h e te r m s o f t h i s a g r e e m e n t s h a l l c o n s t i t u t e co v e n a n t s w h i c h s h a l l r u n w i t h t h e p r o p e r ty f o r t h e b e n e f i t t h e r e o f , a n d t h e b e n e fits of th i s a g r e e m e n t s h a l l b i n d a n d i n u r e t o t h e be n e f i t o f t h e p a r t i e s a n d a l l s u c c e s s o r s i n in t e r e s t t o t h e p a r t i e s h e r e t o . 9- 1 7 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f a Fi n a l S i t e P l a n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l m e e t w i t h t h e Tr a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r t o d e t e r m i n e wh e t h e r a b u s s t o p ( s ) i s r e q u i r e d t o b e p l a c e d ad j a c e n t t o t h e p r o p e r t y . I f a b u s s t o p ( s ) i s r e q u i r ed , i t s h a l l b e p l a c e d i n a l o c a t i o n t h a t l e a s t im p a c t s t r a f f i c f l o w a n d m a y b e d e s i g n e d a s a b u s t u r n o u t o r a f a r s i d e b u s s t o p a s r e q u i r e d b y th e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r a n d p e r t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( O C T A ) . En e r g y E f f i c i e n c y 2- 6 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / a r c h i t e c t s h a l l s u b m i t e n e r g y ca l c u l a t i o n s u s e d t o d e m o n s t r a t e c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e p e r f o r m a n c e a p p r o a c h t o t h e Ca l i f o r n i a E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y S t a n d a r d s t o t h e B u i l d i n g D e p a r t m e n t t h a t s h o w s e a c h n e w st r u c t u r e e x c e e d s t h e a p p l i c a b le B u i l d i n g a n d E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y S t a n d a r d s b y a m i n i m u m of 1 0 p e r c e n t . P l a n s s h a l l s h o w t h e f o l l o w i n g : a) En e r g y - e f f i c i e n t r o o f i n g s y s t e m s , s u c h a s ve g e t a t e d o r “ c o o l ” r o o f s , t h a t r e d u c e 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 4 1 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation ro o f te m p e r a t u r e s s i gn if i ca n t l y d ur i ng t h e su m m e r an d t h er e f or e re d uc e t h e energy re q u i r e m e n t f o r a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g . E x a m p l e s o f e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s an d s u p p l i e r s c a n b e f o u n d a t h t t p : / / e e t d . l b l . g o v / Co o l R o o f s o r s i m i l a r w e b s i t e s . b) C o o l p a v e m e n t m a te r i a l s s u c h a s l i g h t e r - c o l o r e d p a v e m e n t m a t e r i a l s , p o r o u s ma t e r i a l s , o r p e r m e a b l e o r p o r o u s p a v e me n t , f o r a l l r o a d w a y s a n d w a l k w a y s n o t wi t h i n t h e p u b l i c r i g h t - o f - w a y , t o m i n i mi z e t h e a b s o r p t i o n o f s o l a r h e a t a n d su b s e q u e n t t r a n s f e r o f h e a t t o i t s s u r r o un d i n g e n v i r o n m e n t . E x a m p l e s o f c o o l pa v e m e n t m a t e r i a l s a r e a v a i l a b l e at h t t p : / / w w w . e p a . g o v / h e a t i s l d / im a g e s / e x t r a / l e v e l 3 _ p a v i n g p r o d u c t s .h t m l o r s i m i l a r w e b s i t e s . c) E n e r g y s a v i n g d e v i c e s t h a t a c h i e v e t h e e x i s t i n g 2 0 0 8 A p p l i a n c e E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y St a n d a r d s , s u c h a s u s e o f e n e r g y e ff i c i e n t a p p l i a n c e s ( e . g . , E n e r g y S t a r ® ap p l i a n c e s ) a n d u s e o f s u n l i g h t - f i l t e r i n g w i n d o w c o a t i n g s o r d o u b l e - p a n e d wi n d o w s . d) E l e c t r i c a l v e h i c l e c h a r g i ng s t a t i o n s f o r a l l c o m m e r c i a l s t r u c t u r e s e n c o m p a s s i n g ov e r 5 0 , 0 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t . e) S h a d y t r e e s s t r a t e g i c a l l y l o c a t e d w i t h i n cl o s e p r o x i m i t y t o t h e bu i l d i n g s t r u c t u r e t o re d u c e h e a t l o a d a n d r e s u l t i n g e n e r g y u s a g e a t r e s i d e n t i a l , c o m m e r c i a l , a n d o f f i c e bu i l d i n g s . Im p l e m e n t a t i o n o f e n e r gy c o n s e r v a t i o n t e c h n i q u e s ( i . e . , i n s t a l l a t i o n o f e n e r g y s a v i n g d e v i c e s , co n s t r u c t i o n o f e l e c t r i c a l v e h i c l e c h a r g i n g s t a t i o n s , u s e o f s u n l i g h t f i l t e r i n g w i n d o w c o a t i n g s o r do u b l e -pa n e d w i n d o w s , u t i l i z a t i o n o f l i g h t -co l o r e d r o o f i n g m a t e r i a l s a s o p p o s e d t o d ar k - co l o r e d r o o f i n g m a t e r i a l s , a n d p l a c e m e n t o f s h a d y t r e e s n e x t t o h a b i t a b l e s t r u c t u r e s ) s h a l l b e in d i c a t e d o n p l a n s . ( 5. 2 - 6 ) 10 - 2 1 Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f ea c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s s h o w i n g t h a t e a c h s t r u c t u r e w i l l c o m p l y w i t h ex c e e d th e S t a t e E n e r g y E f f i c i e n c y St a n d a r d s f o r N o n r e s i d e n t i a l B u il d i n g s ( T i t l e 2 4 , P a r t 6 , A r t i c l e 2 , C a l i f o r n i a C o d e o f Re g u l a t i o n s ) by a m i n i m u m o f 1 0 p e r c e n t an d w i l l c o n s u l t w i t h t h e Ci t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c Ut i l i t i e s R e s o u r c e E f f i ci e n c y De p a r t m e n t B u s i n e s s a n d C o m m u n i t y P r o g r a m s D i v i s i o n . i n or d e r t o r e v i e w T i t l e 2 4 m e a s u r e s i n co r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e p r o j e c t d e s i g n in c l u d i n g e n e r g y ef f i c i e n t de s i g n s . T h i s c o n s u l t a t i o n s h a l l t a k e p l a c e d u r i n g p r o j e c t d e s i g n in o r d e r to re v i e w Ti t l e 2 4 m e a s u r e s t h a t a r e i n c o r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e p r o j e c t d e s i g n e n e r g y ef f i c i e n t p r a c t i c e s ef f i c i e n c y a n d a l l o w p o t e n t i a l s y s t e m s a l t e r n a t i v e s s u c h a s t h er m a l e n e r g y s t o r a g e a i r - co n d i t i o n i n g , li g h t i n g , a n d b u i l d i n g e n v e l o p e o p t i o n s . P l a n s s u b m i t t e d f o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s s h a l l sh o w t h e p r o p o s e d e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c i e s a n d s y s t e m s a l t e r n a t i v e s . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 1 ) 10 - 2 2 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e of e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , I n o r d e r t o c o n s e r v e e n e r g y , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s i m p l e m e n t e n e r g y - s a v i n g p r a c t i c e s th a t w i l l b e im p l e m e n t e d w i t h t h e p r o j e c t i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h T i t l e 1 0 24 , w h i c h m a y i n c l u d e t h e 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 4 2 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation fo l l o w i n g : • Hi g h - e f f i c i e n c y a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g w i t h E M S ( c o m p u t e r ) c o n t r o l . • Va r i a b l e A i r V o l u m e ( V A V ) a i r d i s t r i b u t i o n . • Ou t s i d e a i r ( 1 0 0 p e r c e n t) e c o n o m i z e r c y c l e . • St a g e d c o m p r e s s o r s o r v a r i a b l e s p e e d d r iv e s t o f l o w v a r y i n g t h e r m a l l o a d s . • Is o l a t e d H V A C z o n e c o n t r o l b y fl o o r s / s e p a r a b l e a c t i v i t y a r e a s . • Sp e c i f i c a t i o n o f p r e m i u m - e f f i c i e n c y e l e c t r ic m o t o r s ( i . e . , c o mp r e s s o r m o t o r s , a i r - ha n d l i n g u n i t s , a n d f a n - c o i l u n i t s ) . • Us e o f o c c u p a n c y s e n s o r s i n a p p r o p r i a t e s p a c e s . • Us e o f c o m p a c t f l u o r e s c e n t l a m p s i n p l a c e o f i n c a n d e s c e n t l a m p s . • Us e o f c o l d c a t h o d e f l u o r e s c e n t l a m p s . • Us e o f E n e r g y S t a r e x i t li g h t i n g o r e x i t s i g n a g e . • Us e o f T - 8 l a m p s a n d e l e c t r o n i c b a l l a s t s w h er e a p p l i c a t i o n s o f s t a n d a r d f l u o r e s c e n t fix t u r e s a r e i d e n t i f i e d . • Us e o f li g h t i n g p o w e r c o n t r o l l e r s i n a s s o c i a t i o n w i t h m e t a l - h a l i d e o r h i g h - p r e s s u r e so d i u m ( h i g h i n t e n s i t y d i s c h a r g e ) l a m p s f o r o u t d o o r l i g h t i n g a n d p a r k i n g l o t s . • Co n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e r m a l e n e r g y s t o r a g e a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g f o r sp a c e s o r h o t e l bu i l d i n g s , m e e t i n g f a c i l i t i e s , t h e a t e r s , o r o t h e r i n t e r m i t t e n t -us e s p a c e s o r fa c i l i t i e s th a t m a y r e q u i r e a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g d u r i n g s u m m e r , d a y - p e a k p e r i o d s . • Co n s i d e r a t i o n f o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n R e s o u r c e E f f i c i e n c y ’ s Ad v a n t a g e S e r v i c e s Pr o g r a m s s u c h a s : ƒ - Ne w c o n s t r u c t i o n d e s i g n r e v i e w , in w h i c h t h e C i t y c o s t - s h a r e s en g i n e e r i n g f e e s f o r u p t o $1 5 , 0 0 0 $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 fo r d e s i g n o f e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t bu i l d i n g s a n d s y s t e m s . ƒ Ne w C o n s t r u c t i o n – C a s h i n c e n t i v e s $ 4 0 0 p e r k W o r $ 0 . 1 5 p e r k W h s a v e d fo r e a c h m e a s u r e a n d u p to $ 2 0 0 , 0 0 0 p e r f a c i l i t y f o r ef f i c i e n c y t h a t e x c e e d Ti t l e 2 4 r e q u i r e m e n t s . - E n e r g y S a l e f o r N e w C o n s t r u c t i o n – C a s h i n c e n t i v e s ( $ 1 5 0 30 0 t o $ 4 0 0 p e r kW r e d u c t i o n i n l o a d ) f o r e f f i c i e n c y t h a t e x c e e d s T i t l e 2 4 r e q u i r e m e n t s . - Gr e e n B u i l d i n g P r o g r a m – O f f e r s a c c e l e r a t e d p l a n a p p r o v a l , f i n a n c i a l in c e n t i v e s , w a i v e d p l a n c h e c k f e e s a n d f r e e t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e . - T h e r m a l E n e r g y S t o r a g e F e a s i b i l i t y S t u d y – C o s t s h a r i n g o f u p t o $ 5 , 0 0 0 f o r th e f e a s i b i l i t y s t u d y o f T E S a p p l i e d t o n e w fa c i l i t i e s . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 2 ) • Us e o f h i g h e f f i c i e n c y t o i l e t s ( 1 . 2 8 g a l l o n s p e r f l u s h ( g p f ) o r l e s s ) . • Us e o f z e r o t o l o w w a t e r u s e ur i n a l s ( 0 . 0 g p f t o 0 . 2 5 g p f ) . • Us e o f w e a t h e r - b a s e d i r r i g a t i o n c o n t r o l l e r s f o r o u t d o o r i r r i g a t i o n . • Us e o f d r o u g h t - t o l e r a n t a n d n a t i v e p l a n t s i n o u t d o o r l a n d s c a p i n g . 10 - 2 4 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e of e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l w h i c h s h a l l e n su r e t h a t b u i l d i n g s a r e i n c o n f o r m a n c e w i t h ex c e e d th e S t a t e E n e r g y C o n s e r v a t i o n Ef f i c i e n c y St a n d a r d s f o r N o n r e s i d e n t i a l b u i l d i n g s ( T i t l e 24 , P a r t 6 , A r t i c l e 2 , C a l i f o r n i a A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C o d e ) by a m i n i m u m o f 1 0 p e r c e n t . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 4 ) 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 4 3 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation Wa t e r C o n s e r v a t i o n a n d E f f i c i e n c y 10 - 7 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , s u b m i t t e d l a n d s c a p e p l a n s s h a l l d e m o n s t r a t e co m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e C i t y o f An a h e i m a d o p t e d L a n d s c a p e W a t e r Ef f i c i e n c y G u i d e l i n e s . T h i s or d i n a n c e i s i n c o m p l i a n c e w i th t h e S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a Mo d e l W a t e r Ef f i c i e n t L a n d s c a p e Or d i n a n c e ( A B 1 8 8 1 ) Co n s e r v a t i o n i n L a n d s c a p i n g A c t ( A B 3 2 5 ) . Am o n g t h e m e a s u r e s t o b e i m p l e m e n t e d wi t h t h e p r o j e c t a r e t h e f o l l o w i n g : • Us e o f w a t e r - c o n s e r v i n g l a n d s c a p e pl a n t m a t e r i a l s w h e r e v e r f e a s i b l e ; • Us e o f v a c u u m s a n d o t h e r e q u i p m e n t t o r e d u ce t h e u s e o f w a t e r f o r w a s h d o w n o f ex t e r i o r a r e a s ; • Lo w - f l o w f i t t i n g s , f i x t u r e s a n d e q u i p m e n t i n c l u d i n g l o w f l u s h t o i l e t s a n d u r i n a l s ; • Us e o f s e l f - c l o s i n g v a l v e s f o r d r i n k i n g f o u n t a i n s ; • Us e o f e f f i c i e n t i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s s u c h a s d r i p i r r i g a t i o n a n d a u t o m a t i c s y s t e m s wh i c h u s e m o i s t u r e s e n s o r s ; • In f r a r e d s e n s o r s o n s i n k s , t o i l e t s a n d u r i n a l s ; • Lo w - f l o w s h o w e r h e a d s i n h o t e l s ; • In f r a r e d s e n s o r s o n d r i n k i n g f o u n t a i n s ; • Us e o f i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s p r i m a r i l y a t n i g h t , w h e n e v a p o r a t i o n r a t e s a r e l o w e s t ; • Wa t e r - e f f i c i e n t i c e m a c h i n e s , d i s h w a s h e r s , c l o t h e s w a s h e r s , a n d o t h e r w a t e r u s i n g ap p l i a n c e s ; • Co o l i n g t o w e r r e c i r c u l a t i n g s y s t e m ; • Us e o f l o w - f l o w s p r i n k l e r h e a d s i n i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m ; • Us e o f w a t e r w a y r e c i r c u l a t i o n s y s t e m s ; • Pr o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e p u b l i c i n c o n s p i c u o u s p l a c e s r e g a r d i n g w a t e r co n s e r v a t i o n ; a n d • Us e o f r e c l a i m e d w a t e r f o r i r r i g a t i o n a n d w a s h d o w n w h e n i t b e c o m e s a v a i l a b l e . In c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h s u b m i t t a l o f l a n d s c a p e a n d b u il d i n g p l a n s , t h e a p p l i c an t s h a l l i d e n t i f y w h i c h of t h e s e m e a s u r e s h a v e b e e n i n co r p o r a t e d i n t o t h e p l a n s . ( 5. 1 1 - 1 ) 10 - 9 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m it o r g r a d i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s i n s t a l l a t i o n o f a s e p a r a t e i r r i g a t i o n m e t e r wh e n t h e t o t a l l a n d s c a p e d a r e a e x c e e d s 2, 5 0 0 s q u a r e f e e t . ( C i t y o f A n a h e i m W a t e r Co n s e r v a t i o n M e a s u r e s ) ( 5. 1 1 - 3 ) 10 - 1 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , s u b m i tt e d l a n d s c a p e p l a n s f o r a l l r e s i d e n t i a l , o f f i c e a n d co m m e r c i a l l a n d s c a p i n g s h a l l d e m o n s t r a t e t h e u s e of d r o u g h t t o l e r a n t p l a n t m a t e r i a l s p u r s u a n t to t h e p u b l i c a t i o n e n t i t l e d “ W a t e r U s e E f f i cie n c y o f L a n d s c a p e S p e c i e s ” b y t h e U . C . Co o p e r a t i v e E x t e n s i o n , A u g u s t 2 0 0 0 . 10 - 1 3 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r ad i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s w a t e r e f f i c i e n t d e s i g n f e a t u r e s i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t li m i t e d t o ( a s a p p l i c a b l e t o t h e t y p e o f d e ve l o p m e n t a t i s s u e ) w a t e r l e s s w a t e r h e a t e r s , wa t e r l e s s u r i n a l s , a u t o m a t i c o n a n d o f f w a te r f a c e t s , a n d w a t e r e f f i c i e n t a p p l i a n c e s . 4. R e v i s i o n s t o t h e D r a f t S E I R Th e P l a n n i n g C e n t e r SEIR No. 339 Response to Comments Pa g e 4 - 4 4 • O c t o b e r 2 0 1 0 City of Anaheim Ta b l e 1 - 4 Su m m a r y o f E n v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t s , Mi t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s a n d L e v e l s o f S i g n i f i c a n c e A f t e r M i t i g a t i o n En v i r o n m e n t a l I m p a c t Le v e l o f Si g n i f i c a n c e Be f o r e M i t i g a t i o n M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s Level of Significance After Mitigation 10 - 1 4 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r ad i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n d i c a t e o n p l a n s i n s t a l l a t i on o f a s e p a r a t e i r r i g a t i o n l i n e s f o r r e c y c l e d wa t e r . A l l i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s s h a l l b e d e s i g n e d s o t h a t t h e y w i l l f u n c t i o n p r o p e r l y w i t h r e c y c l e d wa t e r . APPENDIX B Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Modeling Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Jefferson Stadium Park Project. Orange County (South Coast Air Basin) Land Use - Building 1: 370 dwelling units, 609 space parking garage, and a 13 space parking lot on 4.93 acres. Building 2: 376 dwelling units, 9,600 live/work space, 647 space parking garage, and a 1.1-acre park on 5.12 acres. Construction Phase - Construction expected to begin December 2016 and would finish February 2019. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1543.28 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Regional Shopping Center 9.60 1000sqft 0.22 9,600.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 746.00 Dwelling Unit 5.02 675,606.00 2134 City Park 1.10 Acre 1.10 47,916.00 0 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 1,256.00 Space 1.70 486,544.00 0 Parking Lot 13.00 Space 0.05 2,258.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 3.55 Acre 3.55 154,638.00 0 Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.80 Acre 1.80 78,408.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 5/2/2016 10:21 AM Jefferson Stadium Park Project - Buildings 1 and 2 Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 30 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1165761 14400 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteri orValue 50 250 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 388587 50986 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 388,587.00 50,986.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 1,165,761.00 14,400.00 Energy Mitigation - Title 24 standards will lead to 25% less energy consumption for residential buildings. Water Mitigation - Use of water efficient fixtures per SEIR. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Woodstoves - Comply with SCAQMD regulation which prohibits wood-burning fireplaces or woodstoves. Area Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Use of soil stabilizers. Replace ground cover of area disturbed. Water exposed area three times per day. Maintain vehicle speeds of 15 mph. Maintain soil moisture content of 12 percent. Use of Tier-3 construction equipment. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Existing project site conditions. Trips and VMT - Updated worker trips based off information from applicant. Demolition - 8,500 tons of debris (existing concrete/asphalt). Grading - 25,589 CY of soil exported. Architectural Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Vehicle Trips - Updated trip generation based on traffic study. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Off-road Equipment - Add trenching equipment. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Page 2 of 30 tblFireplaces NumberGas 634.10 653.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/23/2017 3/23/2017 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/14/2019 11/14/2018 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 430.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 Page 3 of 30 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.94 44.32 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 6.72 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 44.32 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 173.00 100.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 863.00 200.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 23.00 24.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 207.00 208.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2021 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 3,199.00 3,200.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 11.30 1.70 tblLandUse LotAcreage 19.63 5.02 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 746,000.00 675,606.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 0.05 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,200.00 2,258.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 502,400.00 486,544.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 37.30 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 25,589.00 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 74.60 93.00 Page 4 of 30 0.0000 2,474.640 7 2,474.6407 0.2688 0.0000 2,480.286 3 0.9395 0.4404 1.3799 0.2738 0.4352 0.7090Total3.1851 10.3488 15.2580 0.0291 0.0000 15.4212 15.4212 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 15.43860.0148 1.3900e- 003 0.0162 3.9400e- 003 1.3800e- 003 5.3100e- 003 2019 1.9749 0.0236 0.0799 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 1,100.555 5 1,100.5555 0.1037 0.0000 1,102.734 0 0.4006 0.1987 0.5993 0.1093 0.1964 0.305620180.6780 4.4765 6.9211 0.0132 0.0000 1,280.713 2 1,280.7132 0.1506 0.0000 1,283.875 9 0.4590 0.2278 0.6868 0.1399 0.2251 0.365020170.5113 5.4834 7.8511 0.0148 0.0000 77.9509 77.9509 0.0137 0.0000 78.23790.0651 0.0125 0.0776 0.0208 0.0124 0.033120160.0209 0.3653 0.4059 8.5000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 2,474.642 0 2,474.6420 0.2688 0.0000 2,480.287 5 1.1554 0.7242 1.8796 0.3557 0.6868 1.0424Total3.9949 14.7077 15.2822 0.0291 0.0000 15.4212 15.4212 8.3000e- 004 0.0000 15.43860.0148 1.8400e- 003 0.0167 3.9400e- 003 1.8300e- 003 5.7700e- 003 2019 1.9777 0.0300 0.0801 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 1,100.556 0 1,100.5560 0.1037 0.0000 1,102.734 5 0.4006 0.2955 0.6960 0.1093 0.2818 0.391120180.9928 5.9017 6.8210 0.0132 0.0000 1,280.713 9 1,280.7139 0.1506 0.0000 1,283.876 5 0.5797 0.3981 0.9779 0.1931 0.3764 0.569520170.9633 8.0875 7.8809 0.0148 0.0000 77.9509 77.9509 0.0137 0.0000 78.23790.1603 0.0288 0.1891 0.0494 0.0268 0.076120160.0611 0.6885 0.5002 8.5000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 37.30 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 37.30 0.00 Page 5 of 30 84.2394 8,141.077 9 8,225.3173 5.7635 0.0516 8,362.333 3 4.4535 0.1368 4.5903 1.1901 0.1317 1.3219Total8.0032 4.3603 28.1176 0.0644 12.5166 596.1392 608.6558 1.2965 0.0326 645.99660.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 71.7228 0.0000 71.7228 4.2387 0.0000 160.73540.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 4,266.059 8 4,266.0598 0.1545 0.0000 4,269.303 8 4.4535 0.0641 4.5176 1.1901 0.0592 1.2493Mobile2.1951 4.0339 20.2890 0.0625 0.0000 3,109.470 8 3,109.4708 0.0585 0.0161 3,115.677 5 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192Energy0.0278 0.2372 0.1013 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 169.4082 169.4082 0.0153 2.8700e- 003 170.62010.0535 0.0535 0.0534 0.0534Area5.7803 0.0892 7.7273 4.1000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 87.3685 10,525.71 52 10,613.083 7 6.1623 0.0610 10,761.39 77 6.8208 0.1714 6.9922 1.8228 0.1641 1.9869Total8.2710 6.0933 35.3139 0.0967 15.6457 701.4074 717.0531 1.6201 0.0407 763.68410.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 71.7228 0.0000 71.7228 4.2387 0.0000 160.73540.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 6,446.362 2 6,446.3622 0.2277 0.0000 6,451.144 6 6.8208 0.0939 6.9147 1.8228 0.0867 1.9095Mobile2.4559 5.7070 27.4598 0.0944 0.0000 3,208.537 4 3,208.5374 0.0604 0.0174 3,215.213 6 0.0240 0.0240 0.0240 0.0240Energy0.0348 0.2971 0.1268 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 169.4082 169.4082 0.0153 2.8700e- 003 170.62010.0535 0.0535 0.0534 0.0534Area5.7803 0.0892 7.7273 4.1000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0018.68 39.19 26.59 23.01 36.63 31.98 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 20.27 29.64 0.16 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 Page 6 of 30 Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Site Preparation Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Demolition Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 30 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 1,368,102; Residential Outdoor: 456,034; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 50,986 7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/27/2018 2/6/2019 5 430 6 Paving Paving 11/15/2018 12/26/2018 5 30 5 Building Construction Building Construction 3/23/2017 11/14/2018 5 30 4 Trenching Trenching 2/23/2017 5/22/2017 5 63 3 Grading Grading 1/12/2017 2/22/2017 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/29/2016 1/11/2017 5 10 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 12/1/2016 12/28/2016 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date 3.58 22.66 22.50 6.47 15.46 22.2934.71 20.23 34.35 34.71 19.74 33.47 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 3.24 28.44 20.38 33.42 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 Page 7 of 30 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDTArchitectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 16.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 13 200.00 208.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching 5 14.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 9 24.00 0.00 3,200.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 5 14.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 6 16.00 0.00 840.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 125 0.42 Building Construction Welders 2 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Air Compressors 3 8.00 78 0.48 Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Trenching Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Trenching Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 361 0.48 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Page 8 of 30 0.0000 29.8013 29.8013 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 29.80728.9600e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0107 2.4500e- 003 1.6100e- 003 4.0600e- 003 Total 8.5700e- 003 0.1226 0.1020 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.5832 1.5832 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.58491.7600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7700e- 003 4.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.8000e- 004 Worker 5.5000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 8.4400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.2181 28.2181 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 28.22237.2000e- 003 1.7400e- 003 8.9400e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.6000e- 003 3.5800e- 003 Hauling 8.0200e- 003 0.1218 0.0936 3.1000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 44.5084 44.5084 0.0123 0.0000 44.76720.0910 0.0248 0.1158 0.0138 0.0231 0.0369Total0.0484 0.5208 0.3666 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 44.5084 44.5084 0.0123 0.0000 44.76720.0248 0.0248 0.0231 0.0231Off-Road 0.0484 0.5208 0.3666 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0910 0.0000 0.0910 0.0138 0.0000 0.0138Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Page 9 of 30 0.0000 3.5027 3.5027 1.0600e- 003 0.0000 3.52490.0602 2.2000e- 003 0.0624 0.0331 2.0300e- 003 0.0351Total4.1000e- 003 0.0451 0.0309 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.5027 3.5027 1.0600e- 003 0.0000 3.52492.2000e- 003 2.2000e- 003 2.0300e- 003 2.0300e- 003 Off-Road 4.1000e- 003 0.0451 0.0309 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0602 0.0000 0.0602 0.0331 0.0000 0.0331Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 29.8013 29.8013 2.8000e- 004 0.0000 29.80728.9600e- 003 1.7500e- 003 0.0107 2.4500e- 003 1.6100e- 003 4.0600e- 003 Total 8.5700e- 003 0.1226 0.1020 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 1.5832 1.5832 8.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.58491.7600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.7700e- 003 4.7000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.8000e- 004 Worker 5.5000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 8.4400e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 28.2181 28.2181 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 28.22237.2000e- 003 1.7400e- 003 8.9400e- 003 1.9800e- 003 1.6000e- 003 3.5800e- 003 Hauling 8.0200e- 003 0.1218 0.0936 3.1000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 44.5083 44.5083 0.0123 0.0000 44.76710.0337 9.9600e- 003 0.0437 5.3700e- 003 9.9600e- 003 0.0153Total0.0114 0.2246 0.2822 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 44.5083 44.5083 0.0123 0.0000 44.76719.9600e- 003 9.9600e- 003 9.9600e- 003 9.9600e- 003 Off-Road 0.0114 0.2246 0.2822 4.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0337 0.0000 0.0337 5.3700e- 003 0.0000 5.3700e- 003 Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 10 of 30 0.0000 0.1385 0.1385 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.13871.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Total 5.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.1385 0.1385 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.13871.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3.5027 3.5027 1.0600e- 003 0.0000 3.52490.0223 8.0000e- 004 0.0231 0.0129 8.0000e- 004 0.0137Total9.1000e- 004 0.0180 0.0210 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.5027 3.5027 1.0600e- 003 0.0000 3.52498.0000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 8.0000e- 004 Off-Road 9.1000e- 004 0.0180 0.0210 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0223 0.0000 0.0223 0.0129 0.0000 0.0129Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.1385 0.1385 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.13871.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Total 5.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.1385 0.1385 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.13871.5000e- 004 0.0000 1.5000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.0000e- 005 Worker 5.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 11 of 30 0.0000 13.7921 13.7921 4.2300e- 003 0.0000 13.88090.0223 3.1800e- 003 0.0255 0.0129 3.1800e- 003 0.0161Total3.6200e- 003 0.0721 0.0840 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 13.7921 13.7921 4.2300e- 003 0.0000 13.88093.1800e- 003 3.1800e- 003 3.1800e- 003 3.1800e- 003 Off-Road 3.6200e- 003 0.0721 0.0840 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0223 0.0000 0.0223 0.0129 0.0000 0.0129Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.5327 0.5327 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53326.1000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 Total 1.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 2.6900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5327 0.5327 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53326.1000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 Worker 1.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 2.6900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 13.7922 13.7922 4.2300e- 003 0.0000 13.88090.0602 8.1900e- 003 0.0684 0.0331 7.5400e- 003 0.0406Total0.0156 0.1692 0.1174 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 13.7922 13.7922 4.2300e- 003 0.0000 13.88098.1900e- 003 8.1900e- 003 7.5400e- 003 7.5400e- 003 Off-Road 0.0156 0.1692 0.1174 1.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0602 0.0000 0.0602 0.0331 0.0000 0.0331Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 12 of 30 0.0000 109.1480 109.1480 9.1000e- 004 0.0000 109.16720.0314 6.1000e- 003 0.0375 8.5800e- 003 5.6200e- 003 0.0142Total0.0299 0.4271 0.3593 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 3.4244 3.4244 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.42783.9500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.9800e- 003 1.0500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 Worker 1.1200e- 003 1.6500e- 003 0.0173 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 105.7236 105.7236 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 105.73950.0274 6.0700e- 003 0.0335 7.5300e- 003 5.5900e- 003 0.0131Hauling0.0287 0.4255 0.3420 1.1800e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 104.2033 104.2033 0.0319 0.0000 104.87380.1316 0.0552 0.1868 0.0542 0.0508 0.1050Total0.1046 1.1914 0.7724 1.1200e- 003 0.0000 104.2033 104.2033 0.0319 0.0000 104.87380.0552 0.0552 0.0508 0.0508Off-Road 0.1046 1.1914 0.7724 1.1200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.1316 0.0000 0.1316 0.0542 0.0000 0.0542Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.5327 0.5327 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53326.1000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 Total 1.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 2.6900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.5327 0.5327 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.53326.1000e- 004 0.0000 6.2000e- 004 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 1.7000e- 004 Worker 1.7000e- 004 2.6000e- 004 2.6900e- 003 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 13 of 30 0.0000 87.5383 87.5383 0.0268 0.0000 88.10160.0384 0.0384 0.0353 0.0353Total0.0702 0.7546 0.5139 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 87.5383 87.5383 0.0268 0.0000 88.10160.0384 0.0384 0.0353 0.0353Off-Road 0.0702 0.7546 0.5139 9.4000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.5 Trenching - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 109.1480 109.1480 9.1000e- 004 0.0000 109.16720.0314 6.1000e- 003 0.0375 8.5800e- 003 5.6200e- 003 0.0142Total0.0299 0.4271 0.3593 1.2300e- 003 0.0000 3.4244 3.4244 1.6000e- 004 0.0000 3.42783.9500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 3.9800e- 003 1.0500e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.0700e- 003 Worker 1.1200e- 003 1.6500e- 003 0.0173 5.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 105.7236 105.7236 7.5000e- 004 0.0000 105.73950.0274 6.0700e- 003 0.0335 7.5300e- 003 5.5900e- 003 0.0131Hauling0.0287 0.4255 0.3420 1.1800e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 104.2032 104.2032 0.0319 0.0000 104.87370.0487 0.0234 0.0721 0.0211 0.0234 0.0445Total0.0275 0.5400 0.6737 1.1200e- 003 0.0000 104.2032 104.2032 0.0319 0.0000 104.87370.0234 0.0234 0.0234 0.0234Off-Road 0.0275 0.5400 0.6737 1.1200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0487 0.0000 0.0487 0.0211 0.0000 0.0211Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 14 of 30 0.0000 4.1949 4.1949 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.19904.8400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 Total 1.3700e- 003 2.0300e- 003 0.0212 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.1949 4.1949 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.19904.8400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 Worker 1.3700e- 003 2.0300e- 003 0.0212 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 87.5382 87.5382 0.0268 0.0000 88.10140.0228 0.0228 0.0228 0.0228Total0.0231 0.4639 0.6202 9.4000e- 004 0.0000 87.5382 87.5382 0.0268 0.0000 88.10140.0228 0.0228 0.0228 0.0228Off-Road 0.0231 0.4639 0.6202 9.4000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 4.1949 4.1949 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.19904.8400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 Total 1.3700e- 003 2.0300e- 003 0.0212 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 4.1949 4.1949 2.0000e- 004 0.0000 4.19904.8400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 4.8700e- 003 1.2900e- 003 3.0000e- 005 1.3200e- 003 Worker 1.3700e- 003 2.0300e- 003 0.0212 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 15 of 30 0.0000 364.0352 364.0352 0.0745 0.0000 365.60040.1450 0.1450 0.1450 0.1450Total0.1823 2.1607 2.7749 4.1700e- 003 0.0000 364.0352 364.0352 0.0745 0.0000 365.60040.1450 0.1450 0.1450 0.1450Off-Road 0.1823 2.1607 2.7749 4.1700e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 597.2690 597.2690 0.0120 0.0000 597.52000.3511 0.0274 0.3785 0.0958 0.0252 0.1210Total0.2434 1.8173 3.3152 7.1600e- 003 0.0000 192.1467 192.1467 9.0700e- 003 0.0000 192.33720.2218 1.5400e- 003 0.2233 0.0589 1.4200e- 003 0.0603Worker0.0627 0.0928 0.9703 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 405.1223 405.1223 2.8800e- 003 0.0000 405.18280.1294 0.0258 0.1552 0.0369 0.0237 0.0607Vendor0.1807 1.7245 2.3449 4.5300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 364.0356 364.0356 0.0745 0.0000 365.60090.2628 0.2628 0.2519 0.2519Total0.4982 3.7255 2.7789 4.1700e- 003 0.0000 364.0356 364.0356 0.0745 0.0000 365.60090.2628 0.2628 0.2519 0.2519Off-Road 0.4982 3.7255 2.7789 4.1700e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 16 of 30 0.0000 658.2461 658.2461 0.0128 0.0000 658.51470.3963 0.0292 0.4255 0.1081 0.0268 0.1350Total0.2549 1.8815 3.5276 8.0700e- 003 0.0000 208.7464 208.7464 9.5600e- 003 0.0000 208.94710.2503 1.7200e- 003 0.2520 0.0665 1.5900e- 003 0.0681Worker0.0645 0.0956 1.0006 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 449.4997 449.4997 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 449.56770.1460 0.0275 0.1734 0.0417 0.0253 0.0669Vendor0.1904 1.7859 2.5270 5.1000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 407.8032 407.8032 0.0812 0.0000 409.50910.2519 0.2519 0.2417 0.2417Total0.4908 3.7581 3.0562 4.7000e- 003 0.0000 407.8032 407.8032 0.0812 0.0000 409.50910.2519 0.2519 0.2417 0.2417Off-Road 0.4908 3.7581 3.0562 4.7000e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 597.2690 597.2690 0.0120 0.0000 597.52000.3511 0.0274 0.3785 0.0958 0.0252 0.1210Total0.2434 1.8173 3.3152 7.1600e- 003 0.0000 192.1467 192.1467 9.0700e- 003 0.0000 192.33720.2218 1.5400e- 003 0.2233 0.0589 1.4200e- 003 0.0603Worker0.0627 0.0928 0.9703 2.6300e- 003 0.0000 405.1223 405.1223 2.8800e- 003 0.0000 405.18280.1294 0.0258 0.1552 0.0369 0.0237 0.0607Vendor0.1807 1.7245 2.3449 4.5300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 17 of 30 0.0000 30.5531 30.5531 9.5100e- 003 0.0000 30.75290.0141 0.0141 0.0130 0.0130Total0.0266 0.2574 0.2174 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving2.4200e- 003 0.0000 30.5531 30.5531 9.5100e- 003 0.0000 30.75290.0141 0.0141 0.0130 0.0130Off-Road 0.0242 0.2574 0.2174 3.3000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.7 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 658.2461 658.2461 0.0128 0.0000 658.51470.3963 0.0292 0.4255 0.1081 0.0268 0.1350Total0.2549 1.8815 3.5276 8.0700e- 003 0.0000 208.7464 208.7464 9.5600e- 003 0.0000 208.94710.2503 1.7200e- 003 0.2520 0.0665 1.5900e- 003 0.0681Worker0.0645 0.0956 1.0006 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 449.4997 449.4997 3.2300e- 003 0.0000 449.56770.1460 0.0275 0.1734 0.0417 0.0253 0.0669Vendor0.1904 1.7859 2.5270 5.1000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 407.8027 407.8027 0.0812 0.0000 409.50860.1604 0.1604 0.1604 0.1604Total0.1923 2.4254 3.1198 4.7000e- 003 0.0000 407.8027 407.8027 0.0812 0.0000 409.50860.1604 0.1604 0.1604 0.1604Off-Road 0.1923 2.4254 3.1198 4.7000e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 18 of 30 0.0000 2.1973 2.1973 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.19942.6300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.6500e- 003 7.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 Total 6.8000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0105 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.1973 2.1973 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.19942.6300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.6500e- 003 7.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 Worker 6.8000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0105 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 30.5531 30.5531 9.5100e- 003 0.0000 30.75288.9700e- 003 8.9700e- 003 8.9700e- 003 8.9700e- 003 Total 0.0107 0.1660 0.2539 3.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving2.4200e- 003 0.0000 30.5531 30.5531 9.5100e- 003 0.0000 30.75288.9700e- 003 8.9700e- 003 8.9700e- 003 8.9700e- 003 Off-Road 8.2400e- 003 0.1660 0.2539 3.3000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 2.1973 2.1973 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.19942.6300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.6500e- 003 7.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 Total 6.8000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0105 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 2.1973 2.1973 1.0000e- 004 0.0000 2.19942.6300e- 003 2.0000e- 005 2.6500e- 003 7.0000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 7.2000e- 004 Worker 6.8000e- 004 1.0100e- 003 0.0105 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 19 of 30 0.0000 0.3830 0.3830 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.38381.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 Total 0.2190 2.0400e- 003 2.7500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.3830 0.3830 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.38381.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 1.4000e- 004 Off-Road 9.0000e- 005 2.0400e- 003 2.7500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.2190 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.3733 1.3733 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.37471.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 Total 4.2000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3733 1.3733 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.37471.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 Worker 4.2000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 0.3830 0.3830 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.38382.3000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 Total 0.2194 3.0100e- 003 2.7800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.3830 0.3830 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.38382.3000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 2.3000e- 004 Off-Road 4.5000e- 004 3.0100e- 003 2.7800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 0.2190 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 20 of 30 0.0000 11.9743 11.9743 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 11.98560.0148 1.0000e- 004 0.0149 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 004 4.0300e- 003 Total 3.5700e- 003 5.2500e- 003 0.0552 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 11.9743 11.9743 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 11.98560.0148 1.0000e- 004 0.0149 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 004 4.0300e- 003 Worker 3.5700e- 003 5.2500e- 003 0.0552 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3.4469 3.4469 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 3.45301.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 Total 1.9741 0.0248 0.0249 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.4469 3.4469 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 3.45301.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 1.7400e- 003 Off-Road 3.6000e- 003 0.0248 0.0249 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 1.9705 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 1.3733 1.3733 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.37471.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 Total 4.2000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.3733 1.3733 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.37471.6500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.6600e- 003 4.4000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 4.5000e- 004 Worker 4.2000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 6.5800e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 21 of 30 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 0.0000 11.9743 11.9743 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 11.98560.0148 1.0000e- 004 0.0149 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 004 4.0300e- 003 Total 3.5700e- 003 5.2500e- 003 0.0552 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 11.9743 11.9743 5.4000e- 004 0.0000 11.98560.0148 1.0000e- 004 0.0149 3.9400e- 003 1.0000e- 004 4.0300e- 003 Worker 3.5700e- 003 5.2500e- 003 0.0552 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3.4469 3.4469 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 3.45301.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 Total 1.9713 0.0183 0.0247 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 3.4469 3.4469 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 3.45301.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 1.2800e- 003 Off-Road 8.0000e- 004 0.0183 0.0247 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 1.9705 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 22 of 30 0.001457 0.002169 0.004600 0.000497 0.002340 SBUS MH 0.506845 0.056549 0.194099 0.151329 0.042005 0.005959 0.015983 0.016167 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 5,438.59 5,438.59 5,438.59 18,050,822 11,785,914 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 425.47 425.47 425.47 920,230 600,845 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 5,013.12 5,013.12 5013.12 17,130,593 11,185,069 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.0000 6,446.362 2 6,446.3622 0.2277 0.0000 6,451.144 6 6.8208 0.0939 6.9147 1.8228 0.0867 1.9095Unmitigated2.4559 5.7070 27.4598 0.0944 0.0000 4,266.059 8 4,266.0598 0.1545 0.0000 4,269.303 8 4.4535 0.0641 4.5176 1.1901 0.0592 1.2493 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 2.1951 4.0339 20.2890 0.0625 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 ROG NOx CO Page 23 of 30 343.9604 6.5900e- 003 6.3100e- 003 346.05370.0240 0.0240 0.0240 0.0000 343.9604 344.9971 Total 0.0348 0.2971 0.1268 1.9000e- 003 0.0240 0.0239 0.0000 342.9102 342.9102 6.5700e- 003 6.2900e- 003 1.8900e- 003 0.0239 0.0239 0.0239 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Apartments Mid Rise 6.42589e+ 006 0.0347 0.2961 0.1260 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.0566 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0502 1.0502 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 19680 1.1000e- 004 9.6000e- 004 8.1000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 343.9604 343.9604 6.5900e- 003 6.3100e- 003 346.0537 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas 0.0240 0.0240 0.0240 0.0240 0.0000 5.2600e- 003 5.0400e- 003 276.3170 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0348 0.2971 0.1268 1.9000e- 003 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 274.6456 274.6456 2,869.159 9 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0278 0.2372 0.1013 1.5100e- 003 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 0.0000 2,864.577 0 2,864.5770 0.0538 0.01110.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,834.825 2 2,834.8252 0.0533 0.0110 2,839.360 4 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 5.0 Energy Detail Page 24 of 30 962.0019Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 1.37205e+ 006 960.4653 0.0181 3.7300e- 003 1.3932 Regional Shopping Center 122880 86.0185 1.6200e- 003 3.3000e- 004 86.1561 Parking Lot 1987.04 1.3910 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,819.608 7 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 2.59521e+ 006 1,816.7022 0.0341 7.0600e- 003 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 274.6456 274.6456 5.2700e- 003 5.0400e- 003 276.3170 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0278 0.2372 0.1013 1.5200e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 273.7235 273.7235 5.2500e- 003 5.0200e- 003 275.3893 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0191 0.0191 0.0191 0.0191 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Apartments Mid Rise 5.12938e+ 006 0.0277 0.2364 0.1006 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.9221 0.9221 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 0.9277 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 17280 9.0000e- 005 8.5000e- 004 7.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO Mitigated Page 25 of 30 0.0000 169.4082 169.4082 0.0153 2.8700e- 003 170.62010.0535 0.0535 0.0534 0.0534Unmitigated5.7803 0.0892 7.7273 4.1000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 962.0019 Total 2,834.8252 0.0533 0.0110 2,839.360 4 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 1.37205e+ 006 960.4653 0.0181 3.7300e- 003 1.3932 Regional Shopping Center 114288 80.0039 1.5000e- 003 3.1000e- 004 80.1319 Parking Lot 1987.04 1.3910 3.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,795.833 4 City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 2.56131e+ 006 1,792.9650 0.0337 6.9700e- 003 Mitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Total 2,864.5770 0.0538 0.0111 2,869.159 9 Page 26 of 30 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower 0.0000 169.4082 169.4082 0.0153 2.8700e- 003 170.62010.0535 0.0535 0.0534 0.0534Total5.7803 0.0892 7.7273 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 12.5987 12.5987 0.0123 0.0000 12.85620.0426 0.0426 0.0426 0.0426Landscaping0.2351 0.0892 7.7264 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 156.8096 156.8096 3.0100e- 003 2.8700e- 003 157.76390.0110 0.0110 0.0108 0.0108Hearth0.0158 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 5.2575 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.2718 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 169.4082 169.4082 0.0153 2.8700e- 003 170.62010.0535 0.0535 0.0534 0.0534Total5.7803 0.0892 7.7273 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 12.5987 12.5987 0.0123 0.0000 12.85620.0426 0.0426 0.0426 0.0426Landscaping0.2351 0.0892 7.7264 4.1000e- 004 0.0000 156.8096 156.8096 3.0100e- 003 2.8700e- 003 157.76390.0110 0.0110 0.0108 0.0108Hearth0.0158 0.0000 8.6000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 5.2575 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.2718 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 27 of 30 0.0000 Total 717.0531 1.6201 0.0407 763.6841 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.711096 / 0.435833 10.0968 0.0234 5.9000e- 004 10.7688 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 742.7059 City Park 0 / 1.31063 10.1931 1.9000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 10.2094 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 48.6049 / 30.6422 696.7633 1.5966 0.0401 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 717.0531 1.6201 0.0407 763.6841 Category t o n MT/yr Mitigated 608.6558 1.2965 0.0326 645.9966 Use Water Efficient Irrigation System Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Page 28 of 30 Unmitigated 71.7228 4.2387 0.0000 160.7354 t o n MT/yr Mitigated 71.7228 4.2387 0.0000 160.7354 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 Total 608.6558 1.2965 0.0326 645.9966 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.568877 / 0.409247 8.5486 0.0187 4.7000e- 004 9.0866 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 627.3233 City Park 0 / 1.23068 9.5713 1.8000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 9.5866 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 38.8839 / 28.773 590.5359 1.2777 0.0321 Mitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Page 29 of 30 0.0000 Total 71.7228 4.2387 0.0000 160.7354 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 10.08 2.0462 0.1209 0.0000 4.5856 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 156.1089 City Park 0.09 0.0183 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 0.0409 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 343.16 69.6584 4.1167 0.0000 Mitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 0.0000 Total 71.7228 4.2387 0.0000 160.7354 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 10.08 2.0462 0.1209 0.0000 4.5856 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 156.1089 City Park 0.09 0.0183 1.0800e- 003 0.0000 0.0409 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 343.16 69.6584 4.1167 0.0000 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Page 30 of 30 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Jefferson Stadium Park Project. Orange County (South Coast Air Basin) Land Use - Building 1: 370 dwelling units, 609 space parking garage, and a 13 space parking lot on 4.93 acres. Building 2: 376 dwelling units, 9,600 live/work space, 647 space parking garage, and a 1.1-acre park on 5.12 acres. Construction Phase - Construction expected to begin December 2016 and would finish February 2019. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1543.28 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Regional Shopping Center 9.60 1000sqft 0.22 9,600.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 746.00 Dwelling Unit 5.02 675,606.00 2134 City Park 1.10 Acre 1.10 47,916.00 0 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 1,256.00 Space 1.70 486,544.00 0 Parking Lot 13.00 Space 0.05 2,258.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 3.55 Acre 3.55 154,638.00 0 Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.80 Acre 1.80 78,408.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 5/2/2016 10:22 AM Jefferson Stadium Park Project - Buildings 1 and 2 Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 25 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1165761 14400 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteri orValue 50 250 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 388587 50986 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 388,587.00 50,986.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 1,165,761.00 14,400.00 Energy Mitigation - Title 24 standards will lead to 25% less energy consumption for residential buildings. Water Mitigation - Use of water efficient fixtures per SEIR. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Woodstoves - Comply with SCAQMD regulation which prohibits wood-burning fireplaces or woodstoves. Area Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Use of soil stabilizers. Replace ground cover of area disturbed. Water exposed area three times per day. Maintain vehicle speeds of 15 mph. Maintain soil moisture content of 12 percent. Use of Tier-3 construction equipment. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Existing project site conditions. Trips and VMT - Updated worker trips based off information from applicant. Demolition - 8,500 tons of debris (existing concrete/asphalt). Grading - 25,589 CY of soil exported. Architectural Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Vehicle Trips - Updated trip generation based on traffic study. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Off-road Equipment - Add trenching equipment. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Page 2 of 25 tblFireplaces NumberGas 634.10 653.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/23/2017 3/23/2017 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/14/2019 11/14/2018 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 430.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 Page 3 of 25 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.94 44.32 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 6.72 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 44.32 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 173.00 100.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 863.00 200.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 23.00 24.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 207.00 208.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2021 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 3,199.00 3,200.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 11.30 1.70 tblLandUse LotAcreage 19.63 5.02 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 746,000.00 675,606.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 0.05 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,200.00 2,258.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 502,400.00 486,544.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 37.30 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 25,589.00 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 74.60 93.00 Page 4 of 25 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0049.58 42.64 47.57 55.38 39.89 50.71 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 2.85 38.54 2.51 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 35,601.41 98 35,601.419 8 4.7790 0.0000 35,701.77 97 14.6481 5.3640 19.2107 6.5065 5.3072 10.3446Total299.4631 135.9069 177.0130 0.3672 0.0000 1,298.635 9 1,298.6359 0.0679 0.0000 1,300.061 4 1.1178 0.1027 1.2205 0.2964 0.1021 0.39862019146.2948 1.7012 6.1137 0.0166 0.0000 10,404.85 63 10,404.856 3 0.9087 0.0000 10,423.93 97 3.5356 1.6617 5.1973 0.9631 1.6413 2.60452018146.3133 37.0447 55.5247 0.1133 0.0000 15,696.55 48 15,696.554 8 2.4133 0.0000 15,747.23 38 5.3759 2.4283 7.3416 2.6235 2.4066 3.921520174.8929 63.0541 77.8792 0.1565 0.0000 8,201.372 9 8,201.3729 1.3891 0.0000 8,230.544 8 4.6189 1.1713 5.4513 2.6235 1.1572 3.420120161.9621 34.1069 37.4954 0.0808 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 35,601.41 98 35,601.419 8 4.7790 0.0000 35,701.77 97 29.0547 9.3515 36.6431 14.5835 8.8287 20.9864Total308.2350 221.1175 181.5688 0.3672 0.0000 1,298.635 9 1,298.6359 0.0679 0.0000 1,300.061 4 1.1178 0.1364 1.2541 0.2964 0.1358 0.43232019146.5018 2.1796 6.1226 0.0166 0.0000 10,404.85 63 10,404.856 3 0.9087 0.0000 10,423.93 97 3.5356 2.4650 6.0006 0.9631 2.3551 3.31822018146.5525 48.7349 54.9668 0.1133 0.0000 15,696.55 48 15,696.554 8 2.4133 0.0000 15,747.23 38 12.2007 4.0914 14.9852 6.6620 3.8640 8.547720179.5164 106.4812 74.5460 0.1565 0.0000 8,201.372 9 8,201.3729 1.3891 0.0000 8,230.544 8 12.2007 2.6588 14.4032 6.6620 2.4738 8.688320165.6643 63.7219 45.9335 0.0808 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 37.30 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 37.30 0.00 Page 5 of 25 0.00 24.97 24.97 25.21 2.63 24.9334.71 10.23 33.57 34.71 9.81 30.94 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 3.18 27.92 19.74 33.39 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 42,292.52 96 42,292.529 6 1.3413 0.2839 42,408.71 53 24.9096 1.6732 26.5828 6.6472 1.6371 8.2842Total45.7103 22.6658 171.8245 0.3666 26,694.31 66 26,694.316 6 0.9363 26,713.97 94 24.9096 0.3519 25.2615 6.6472 0.3250 6.9721Mobile12.1119 20.6528 109.3889 0.3551 1,658.876 4 1,658.8764 0.0318 0.0304 1,668.972 1 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051Energy0.1521 1.2997 0.5550 8.2900e- 003 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Area33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 56,363.96 49 56,363.964 9 1.7935 0.2916 56,492.02 69 38.1505 1.8639 40.0144 10.1805 1.8152 11.9957Total47.2099 31.4435 214.0838 0.5504 40,347.08 61 40,347.086 1 1.3805 40,376.07 72 38.1505 0.5161 38.6666 10.1805 0.4765 10.6571Mobile13.5730 29.1025 151.5085 0.5367 2,077.542 2 2,077.5422 0.0398 0.0381 2,090.185 8 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316Energy0.1904 1.6277 0.6948 0.0104 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Area33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 6 of 25 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 361 0.48 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Site Preparation Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Demolition Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 30 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 1,368,102; Residential Outdoor: 456,034; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 50,986 7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/27/2018 2/6/2019 5 430 6 Paving Paving 11/15/2018 12/26/2018 5 30 5 Building Construction Building Construction 3/23/2017 11/14/2018 5 30 4 Trenching Trenching 2/23/2017 5/22/2017 5 63 3 Grading Grading 1/12/2017 2/22/2017 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/29/2016 1/11/2017 5 10 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 12/1/2016 12/28/2016 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date Page 7 of 25 Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area Water Unpaved Roads 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 16.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 13 200.00 208.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching 5 14.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 9 24.00 0.00 3,200.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 5 14.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 6 16.00 0.00 840.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 125 0.42 Building Construction Welders 2 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Air Compressors 3 8.00 78 0.48 Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Trenching Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Trenching Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Page 8 of 25 0.0000 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 3.3695 0.9960 4.3655 0.5370 0.9960 1.5330Total1.1392 22.4620 28.2179 0.0478 0.0000 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 0.9960 0.9960 0.9960 0.9960Off-Road 1.1392 22.4620 28.2179 0.0478 0.0000 0.00003.3695 0.0000 3.3695 0.5370 0.0000 0.5370Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,295.162 4 3,295.1624 0.0307 3,295.806 3 0.9105 0.1753 1.0858 0.2478 0.1612 0.4090Total0.8229 11.6449 9.2776 0.0331 181.5363 181.5363 8.5400e- 003 181.71550.1788 1.2500e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1500e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0555 0.0717 0.8784 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3,113.626 1 3,113.6261 0.0221 3,114.090 8 0.7317 0.1740 0.9057 0.2003 0.1601 0.3604Hauling0.7674 11.5732 8.3992 0.0309 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 9.0946 2.4835 11.5781 1.3770 2.3126 3.6896Total4.8414 52.0770 36.6559 0.0478 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 2.4835 2.4835 2.3126 2.3126Off-Road 4.8414 52.0770 36.6559 0.0478 0.0000 0.00009.0946 0.0000 9.0946 1.3770 0.0000 1.3770Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Page 9 of 25 158.8442 158.8442 7.4700e- 003 159.00110.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Total0.0486 0.0628 0.7686 1.9000e- 003 158.8442 158.8442 7.4700e- 003 159.00110.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Worker0.0486 0.0628 0.7686 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 12.0442 2.2015 14.2456 6.6205 2.0253 8.6458Total4.0996 45.1034 30.8491 0.0371 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 2.2015 2.2015 2.0253 2.0253Off-Road 4.0996 45.1034 30.8491 0.0371 0.0000 0.000012.0442 0.0000 12.0442 6.6205 0.0000 6.6205Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,295.162 4 3,295.1624 0.0307 3,295.806 3 0.9105 0.1753 1.0858 0.2478 0.1612 0.4090Total0.8229 11.6449 9.2776 0.0331 181.5363 181.5363 8.5400e- 003 181.71550.1788 1.2500e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1500e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0555 0.0717 0.8784 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3,113.626 1 3,113.6261 0.0221 3,114.090 8 0.7317 0.1740 0.9057 0.2003 0.1601 0.3604Hauling0.7674 11.5732 8.3992 0.0309 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 10 of 25 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 12.0442 2.0486 14.0928 6.6205 1.8847 8.5052Total3.8863 42.3074 29.3542 0.0371 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 2.0486 2.0486 1.8847 1.8847Off-Road 3.8863 42.3074 29.3542 0.0371 0.0000 0.000012.0442 0.0000 12.0442 6.6205 0.0000 6.6205Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 158.8442 158.8442 7.4700e- 003 159.00110.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Total0.0486 0.0628 0.7686 1.9000e- 003 158.8442 158.8442 7.4700e- 003 159.00110.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Worker0.0486 0.0628 0.7686 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 4.4624 0.7956 5.2580 2.5820 0.7956 3.3776Total0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956Off-Road 0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 0.00004.4624 0.0000 4.4624 2.5820 0.0000 2.5820Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 11 of 25 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 4.4624 0.7956 5.2580 2.5820 0.7956 3.3776Total0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956Off-Road 0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 0.00004.4624 0.0000 4.4624 2.5820 0.0000 2.5820Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 12 of 25 0.0000 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 3.2492 1.5593 4.8085 1.4083 1.5593 2.9676Total1.8345 35.9993 44.9134 0.0749 0.0000 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 1.5593 1.5593 1.5593 1.5593Off-Road 1.8345 35.9993 44.9134 0.0749 0.0000 0.00003.2492 0.0000 3.2492 1.4083 0.0000 1.4083Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 8,038.923 3 8,038.9233 0.0670 8,040.330 4 2.1267 0.4064 2.5331 0.5800 0.3738 0.9538Total1.9143 27.0548 21.5726 0.0816 261.7750 261.7750 0.0119 262.02450.2683 1.8300e- 003 0.2701 0.0711 1.6900e- 003 0.0728Worker0.0758 0.0977 1.2018 3.2600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7,777.148 3 7,777.1483 0.0551 7,778.305 9 1.8584 0.4046 2.2630 0.5089 0.3721 0.8810Hauling1.8385 26.9572 20.3708 0.0784 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 8.7698 3.6823 12.4521 3.6111 3.3877 6.9988Total6.9711 79.4263 51.4904 0.0749 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 3.6823 3.6823 3.3877 3.3877Off-Road 6.9711 79.4263 51.4904 0.0749 0.0000 0.00008.7698 0.0000 8.7698 3.6111 0.0000 3.6111Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 13 of 25 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 1.2182 1.2182 1.1207 1.1207Total2.2300 23.9558 16.3151 0.0300 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 1.2182 1.2182 1.1207 1.1207Off-Road 2.2300 23.9558 16.3151 0.0300 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.5 Trenching - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 8,038.923 3 8,038.9233 0.0670 8,040.330 4 2.1267 0.4064 2.5331 0.5800 0.3738 0.9538Total1.9143 27.0548 21.5726 0.0816 261.7750 261.7750 0.0119 262.02450.2683 1.8300e- 003 0.2701 0.0711 1.6900e- 003 0.0728Worker0.0758 0.0977 1.2018 3.2600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7,777.148 3 7,777.1483 0.0551 7,778.305 9 1.8584 0.4046 2.2630 0.5089 0.3721 0.8810Hauling1.8385 26.9572 20.3708 0.0784 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 14 of 25 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 2.6023 2.6023 2.4941 2.4941Total4.9325 36.8865 27.5141 0.0413 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 2.6023 2.6023 2.4941 2.4941Off-Road 4.9325 36.8865 27.5141 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 152.7021 152.7021 6.9300e- 003 152.84770.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0442 0.0570 0.7010 1.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222Total0.7342 14.7261 19.6887 0.0300 0.0000 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222Off-Road 0.7342 14.7261 19.6887 0.0300 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 15 of 25 6,618.705 8 6,618.7058 0.1300 6,621.436 6 3.5357 0.2698 3.8055 0.9632 0.2482 1.2113Total2.3097 17.1833 30.0157 0.0721 2,181.458 2 2,181.4582 0.0990 2,183.537 8 2.2355 0.0153 2.2508 0.5929 0.0141 0.6070Worker0.6317 0.8140 10.0149 0.0271 4,437.247 6 4,437.2476 0.0310 4,437.898 9 1.3002 0.2545 1.5547 0.3703 0.2341 0.6044Vendor1.6779 16.3693 20.0008 0.0449 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353Total1.8049 21.3932 27.4738 0.0413 0.0000 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353Off-Road 1.8049 21.3932 27.4738 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6,618.705 8 6,618.7058 0.1300 6,621.436 6 3.5357 0.2698 3.8055 0.9632 0.2482 1.2113Total2.3097 17.1833 30.0157 0.0721 2,181.458 2 2,181.4582 0.0990 2,183.537 8 2.2355 0.0153 2.2508 0.5929 0.0141 0.6070Worker0.6317 0.8140 10.0149 0.0271 4,437.247 6 4,437.2476 0.0310 4,437.898 9 1.3002 0.2545 1.5547 0.3703 0.2341 0.6044Vendor1.6779 16.3693 20.0008 0.0449 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 16 of 25 0.0000 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068Total1.6866 21.2756 27.3664 0.0413 0.0000 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068Off-Road 1.6866 21.2756 27.3664 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6,461.645 4 6,461.6454 0.1233 6,464.233 9 3.5356 0.2549 3.7905 0.9631 0.2345 1.1977Total2.1478 15.7691 28.1583 0.0720 2,099.731 7 2,099.7317 0.0924 2,101.672 4 2.2355 0.0151 2.2506 0.5929 0.0140 0.6069Worker0.5766 0.7428 9.1718 0.0271 4,361.913 8 4,361.9138 0.0309 4,362.561 6 1.3001 0.2398 1.5399 0.3703 0.2206 0.5908Vendor1.5712 15.0263 18.9865 0.0449 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 2.2100 2.2100 2.1205 2.1205Total4.3050 32.9658 26.8085 0.0413 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 2.2100 2.2100 2.1205 2.1205Off-Road 4.3050 32.9658 26.8085 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 17 of 25 167.9785 167.9785 7.3900e- 003 168.13380.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Total0.0461 0.0594 0.7338 2.1700e- 003 167.9785 167.9785 7.3900e- 003 168.13380.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0461 0.0594 0.7338 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.9386 0.9386 0.8635 0.8635Total1.7730 17.1628 14.4944 0.0223 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving0.1616 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.9386 0.9386 0.8635 0.8635Off-Road 1.6114 17.1628 14.4944 0.0223 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.7 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6,461.645 4 6,461.6454 0.1233 6,464.233 9 3.5356 0.2549 3.7905 0.9631 0.2345 1.1977Total2.1478 15.7691 28.1583 0.0720 2,099.731 7 2,099.7317 0.0924 2,101.672 4 2.2355 0.0151 2.2506 0.5929 0.0140 0.6069Worker0.5766 0.7428 9.1718 0.0271 4,361.913 8 4,361.9138 0.0309 4,362.561 6 1.3001 0.2398 1.5399 0.3703 0.2206 0.5908Vendor1.5712 15.0263 18.9865 0.0449 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 18 of 25 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Total146.2642 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 167.9785 167.9785 7.3900e- 003 168.13380.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Total0.0461 0.0594 0.7338 2.1700e- 003 167.9785 167.9785 7.3900e- 003 168.13380.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0461 0.0594 0.7338 2.1700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982Total0.7106 11.0645 16.9276 0.0223 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving0.1616 0.0000 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982Off-Road 0.5490 11.0645 16.9276 0.0223 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 19 of 25 1,049.865 8 1,049.8658 0.0462 1,050.836 2 1.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Total0.2883 0.3714 4.5859 0.0136 1,049.865 8 1,049.8658 0.0462 1,050.836 2 1.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Worker0.2883 0.3714 4.5859 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Total146.0250 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,049.865 8 1,049.8658 0.0462 1,050.836 2 1.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Total0.2883 0.3714 4.5859 0.0136 1,049.865 8 1,049.8658 0.0462 1,050.836 2 1.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Worker0.2883 0.3714 4.5859 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 20 of 25 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Total146.0250 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 1,017.187 9 1,017.1879 0.0441 1,018.114 1 1.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Total0.2698 0.3442 4.2813 0.0136 1,017.187 9 1,017.1879 0.0441 1,018.114 1 1.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Worker0.2698 0.3442 4.2813 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Total146.2320 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 21 of 25 Total 5,438.59 5,438.59 5,438.59 18,050,822 11,785,914 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 425.47 425.47 425.47 920,230 600,845 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 5,013.12 5,013.12 5013.12 17,130,593 11,185,069 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 40,347.08 61 40,347.086 1 1.3805 40,376.07 72 38.1505 0.5161 38.6666 10.1805 0.4765 10.6571Unmitigated13.5730 29.1025 151.5085 0.5367 26,694.31 66 26,694.316 6 0.9363 26,713.97 94 24.9096 0.3519 25.2615 6.6472 0.3250 6.9721 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 12.1119 20.6528 109.3889 0.3551 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network ROG NOx CO 1,017.187 9 1,017.1879 0.0441 1,018.114 1 1.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Total0.2698 0.3442 4.2813 0.0136 1,017.187 9 1,017.1879 0.0441 1,018.114 1 1.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Worker0.2698 0.3442 4.2813 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 22 of 25 2,090.185 8 0.1316 2,077.542 2 2,077.5422 0.0398 0.03810.0104 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316 1,658.876 4 1,658.8764 0.0318 0.0304 1,668.972 1 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1904 1.6277 0.6948 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1521 1.2997 0.5550 8.2900e- 003 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 0.001457 0.002169 0.004600 0.000497 0.002340 5.0 Energy Detail SBUS MH 0.506845 0.056549 0.194099 0.151329 0.042005 0.005959 0.015983 0.016167 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Page 23 of 25 1,658.8764 1,658.876 4 0.0318 0.0304 1,668.972 1 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051Total0.1521 1.2997 0.5550 8.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,653.3067 1,653.306 7 0.0317 0.0303 1,663.368 5 0.1047 0.1047 0.1047 0.1047Apartments Mid Rise 14.0531 0.1516 1.2951 0.5511 8.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.5697 5.5697 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.60363.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 0.0473425 5.1000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 3.9000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 2,077.5422 2,077.542 2 0.0398 0.0381 2,090.185 8 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316Total0.1904 1.6277 0.6948 0.0104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 2,071.1990 2,071.199 0 0.0397 0.0380 2,083.803 9 0.1312 0.1312 0.1312 0.1312Apartments Mid Rise 17605.2 0.1899 1.6224 0.6904 0.0104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.3433 6.3433 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.38194.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 53.9178 5.8000e- 004 5.2900e- 003 4.4400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Page 24 of 25 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Total33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 111.1013 111.1013 0.1081 113.37220.3405 0.3405 0.3405 0.3405Landscaping1.8811 0.7132 61.8114 3.2600e- 003 0.0000 13,828.23 53 13,828.235 3 0.2650 0.2535 13,912.39 16 0.8758 0.8758 0.8666 0.8666Hearth1.2676 6.0000e- 005 0.0691 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 28.8084 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 1.4893 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Unmitigated33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 0.0000 13,939.33 13,939.336 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.761.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Mitigated33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Page 25 of 25 Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Jefferson Stadium Park Project. Orange County (South Coast Air Basin) Land Use - Building 1: 370 dwelling units, 609 space parking garage, and a 13 space parking lot on 4.93 acres. Building 2: 376 dwelling units, 9,600 live/work space, 647 space parking garage, and a 1.1-acre park on 5.12 acres. Construction Phase - Construction expected to begin December 2016 and would finish February 2019. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1543.28 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Regional Shopping Center 9.60 1000sqft 0.22 9,600.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 746.00 Dwelling Unit 5.02 675,606.00 2134 City Park 1.10 Acre 1.10 47,916.00 0 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 1,256.00 Space 1.70 486,544.00 0 Parking Lot 13.00 Space 0.05 2,258.00 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 3.55 Acre 3.55 154,638.00 0 Population Other Asphalt Surfaces 1.80 Acre 1.80 78,408.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 5/2/2016 10:22 AM Jefferson Stadium Park Project - Buildings 1 and 2 Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 26 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 6.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 1165761 14400 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteri orValue 50 250 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 388587 50986 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 388,587.00 50,986.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 1,165,761.00 14,400.00 Energy Mitigation - Title 24 standards will lead to 25% less energy consumption for residential buildings. Water Mitigation - Use of water efficient fixtures per SEIR. Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value Woodstoves - Comply with SCAQMD regulation which prohibits wood-burning fireplaces or woodstoves. Area Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Use of soil stabilizers. Replace ground cover of area disturbed. Water exposed area three times per day. Maintain vehicle speeds of 15 mph. Maintain soil moisture content of 12 percent. Use of Tier-3 construction equipment. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Existing project site conditions. Trips and VMT - Updated worker trips based off information from applicant. Demolition - 8,500 tons of debris (existing concrete/asphalt). Grading - 25,589 CY of soil exported. Architectural Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Vehicle Trips - Updated trip generation based on traffic study. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Off-road Equipment - Add trenching equipment. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. Page 2 of 26 tblFireplaces NumberGas 634.10 653.00 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 74.60 93.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseStartDate 5/23/2017 3/23/2017 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00 tblConstructionPhase PhaseEndDate 1/14/2019 11/14/2018 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 20.00 30.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 300.00 430.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 9.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 5.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 2.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 Page 3 of 26 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.94 44.32 tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 37.30 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 6.72 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 1.59 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 1.59 0.00 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 44.32 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 1.59 0.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 173.00 100.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 863.00 200.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 13.00 14.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 23.00 24.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 207.00 208.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 15.00 16.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2021 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 3,199.00 3,200.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 4.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 1.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblOffRoadEquipment OffRoadEquipmentUnitAmount 3.00 2.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 11.30 1.70 tblLandUse LotAcreage 19.63 5.02 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 746,000.00 675,606.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.12 0.05 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 5,200.00 2,258.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 502,400.00 486,544.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 37.30 0.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 25,589.00 Page 4 of 26 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0049.58 42.62 47.57 55.38 39.86 50.70 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 2.84 38.23 2.40 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 35,349.71 62 35,349.716 2 4.7811 0.0000 35,450.11 96 14.6481 5.3693 19.2143 6.5065 5.3121 10.3476Total299.7576 137.6885 185.1307 0.3642 0.0000 1,244.613 8 1,244.6138 0.0679 0.0000 1,246.039 3 1.1178 0.1027 1.2205 0.2964 0.1021 0.39862019146.3078 1.7354 5.8301 0.0159 0.0000 10,256.61 82 10,256.618 2 0.9097 0.0000 10,275.72 27 3.5356 1.6640 5.1997 0.9631 1.6435 2.60662018146.3276 37.4566 59.1479 0.1115 0.0000 15,664.13 82 15,664.138 2 2.4141 0.0000 15,714.83 34 5.3759 2.4309 7.3425 2.6235 2.4090 3.922320175.1038 63.9857 81.4674 0.1562 0.0000 8,184.346 0 8,184.3460 1.3894 0.0000 8,213.524 2 4.6189 1.1717 5.4517 2.6235 1.1576 3.420120162.0183 34.5107 38.6853 0.0807 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 35,349.71 62 35,349.716 2 4.7811 0.0000 35,450.11 96 29.0547 9.3568 36.6463 14.5835 8.8336 20.9886Total308.5295 222.8991 189.6865 0.3642 0.0000 1,244.613 8 1,244.6138 0.0679 0.0000 1,246.039 3 1.1178 0.1364 1.2541 0.2964 0.1358 0.43232019146.5149 2.2138 5.8390 0.0159 0.0000 10,256.61 82 10,256.618 2 0.9097 0.0000 10,275.72 27 3.5356 2.4673 6.0029 0.9631 2.3572 3.32042018146.5668 49.1468 58.5900 0.1115 0.0000 15,664.13 82 15,664.138 2 2.4141 0.0000 15,714.83 34 12.2007 4.0940 14.9861 6.6620 3.8663 8.547720179.7273 107.4128 78.1342 0.1562 0.0000 8,184.346 0 8,184.3460 1.3894 0.0000 8,213.524 2 12.2007 2.6592 14.4032 6.6620 2.4742 8.688320165.7205 64.1257 47.1233 0.0807 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 37.30 0.00 tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 Page 5 of 26 0.00 24.68 24.68 25.20 2.63 24.6434.71 10.22 33.57 34.71 9.80 30.94 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 3.04 28.16 18.13 33.34 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 41,148.81 09 41,148.810 9 1.3423 0.2839 41,265.01 74 24.9096 1.6746 26.5842 6.6472 1.6383 8.2855Total46.4518 23.7776 173.9821 0.3507 25,550.59 79 25,550.597 9 0.9373 25,570.28 15 24.9096 0.3533 25.2629 6.6472 0.3262 6.9734Mobile12.8534 21.7646 111.5466 0.3392 1,658.876 4 1,658.8764 0.0318 0.0304 1,668.972 1 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051Energy0.1521 1.2997 0.5550 8.2900e- 003 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Area33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 54,629.18 44 54,629.184 4 1.7945 0.2916 54,757.26 72 38.1505 1.8653 40.0158 10.1805 1.8164 11.9969Total47.9098 33.0979 212.5040 0.5262 38,612.30 56 38,612.305 6 1.3815 38,641.31 75 38.1505 0.5175 38.6680 10.1805 0.4778 10.6583Mobile14.2730 30.7569 149.9286 0.5125 2,077.542 2 2,077.5422 0.0398 0.0381 2,090.185 8 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316Energy0.1904 1.6277 0.6948 0.0104 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Area33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 6 of 26 Grading Scrapers 2 8.00 361 0.48 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Site Preparation Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Site Preparation Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Site Preparation Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 2 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Demolition Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power 30 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 75 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 1,368,102; Residential Outdoor: 456,034; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,400; Non-Residential Outdoor: 50,986 7 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 12/27/2018 2/6/2019 5 430 6 Paving Paving 11/15/2018 12/26/2018 5 30 5 Building Construction Building Construction 3/23/2017 11/14/2018 5 30 4 Trenching Trenching 2/23/2017 5/22/2017 5 63 3 Grading Grading 1/12/2017 2/22/2017 5 20 2 Site Preparation Site Preparation 12/29/2016 1/11/2017 5 10 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 12/1/2016 12/28/2016 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date Page 7 of 26 Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Use Soil Stabilizer Replace Ground Cover Water Exposed Area 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 16.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 13 200.00 208.00 0.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Trenching 5 14.00 0.00 0.00 Grading 9 24.00 0.00 3,200.00 14.70 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Site Preparation 5 14.00 0.00 0.00 Demolition 6 16.00 0.00 840.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Paving Equipment 2 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Pavers 2 8.00 125 0.42 Building Construction Welders 2 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Cranes 1 7.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Air Compressors 3 8.00 78 0.48 Trenching Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Trenching Off-Highway Trucks 1 8.00 400 0.38 Trenching Excavators 2 8.00 162 0.38 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 8.00 97 0.37 Page 8 of 26 3,278.135 5 3,278.1355 0.0310 3,278.785 7 0.9105 0.1757 1.0862 0.2478 0.1616 0.4094Total0.8791 12.0487 10.4674 0.0329 171.9309 171.9309 8.5400e- 003 172.11010.1788 1.2500e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1500e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0584 0.0789 0.8274 2.0600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3,106.204 7 3,106.2047 0.0224 3,106.675 6 0.7317 0.1745 0.9061 0.2003 0.1605 0.3608Hauling0.8207 11.9698 9.6401 0.0308 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 9.0946 2.4835 11.5781 1.3770 2.3126 3.6896Total4.8414 52.0770 36.6559 0.0478 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 2.4835 2.4835 2.3126 2.3126Off-Road 4.8414 52.0770 36.6559 0.0478 0.0000 0.00009.0946 0.0000 9.0946 1.3770 0.0000 1.3770Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Demolition - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Water Unpaved Roads Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads Page 9 of 26 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 12.0442 2.2015 14.2456 6.6205 2.0253 8.6458Total4.0996 45.1034 30.8491 0.0371 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 2.2015 2.2015 2.0253 2.0253Off-Road 4.0996 45.1034 30.8491 0.0371 0.0000 0.000012.0442 0.0000 12.0442 6.6205 0.0000 6.6205Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2016 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,278.135 5 3,278.1355 0.0310 3,278.785 7 0.9105 0.1757 1.0862 0.2478 0.1616 0.4094Total0.8791 12.0487 10.4674 0.0329 171.9309 171.9309 8.5400e- 003 172.11010.1788 1.2500e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1500e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0584 0.0789 0.8274 2.0600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 3,106.204 7 3,106.2047 0.0224 3,106.675 6 0.7317 0.1745 0.9061 0.2003 0.1605 0.3608Hauling0.8207 11.9698 9.6401 0.0308 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 3.3695 0.9960 4.3655 0.5370 0.9960 1.5330Total1.1392 22.4620 28.2179 0.0478 0.0000 4,906.210 5 4,906.2105 1.3585 4,934.738 5 0.9960 0.9960 0.9960 0.9960Off-Road 1.1392 22.4620 28.2179 0.0478 0.0000 0.00003.3695 0.0000 3.3695 0.5370 0.0000 0.5370Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 10 of 26 150.4395 150.4395 7.4700e- 003 150.59640.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Total0.0511 0.0690 0.7240 1.8000e- 003 150.4395 150.4395 7.4700e- 003 150.59640.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Worker0.0511 0.0690 0.7240 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 4.4624 0.7956 5.2580 2.5820 0.7956 3.3776Total0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 3,861.063 2 3,861.0632 1.1646 3,885.520 5 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956Off-Road 0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 0.00004.4624 0.0000 4.4624 2.5820 0.0000 2.5820Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 150.4395 150.4395 7.4700e- 003 150.59640.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Total0.0511 0.0690 0.7240 1.8000e- 003 150.4395 150.4395 7.4700e- 003 150.59640.1565 1.0900e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 1.0100e- 003 0.0425Worker0.0511 0.0690 0.7240 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 11 of 26 0.0000 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 4.4624 0.7956 5.2580 2.5820 0.7956 3.3776Total0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956 0.7956Off-Road 0.9054 18.0355 21.0089 0.0371 0.0000 0.00004.4624 0.0000 4.4624 2.5820 0.0000 2.5820Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 12.0442 2.0486 14.0928 6.6205 1.8847 8.5052Total3.8863 42.3074 29.3542 0.0371 3,800.809 8 3,800.8098 1.1646 3,825.265 5 2.0486 2.0486 1.8847 1.8847Off-Road 3.8863 42.3074 29.3542 0.0371 0.0000 0.000012.0442 0.0000 12.0442 6.6205 0.0000 6.6205Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Site Preparation - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 12 of 26 8,006.506 8 8,006.5068 0.0678 8,007.930 0 2.1267 0.4073 2.5340 0.5800 0.3746 0.9547Total2.0374 27.9865 24.6539 0.0813 247.9129 247.9129 0.0119 248.16240.2683 1.8300e- 003 0.2701 0.0711 1.6900e- 003 0.0728Worker0.0797 0.1074 1.1287 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7,758.593 9 7,758.5939 0.0559 7,759.767 6 1.8584 0.4055 2.2639 0.5089 0.3730 0.8819Hauling1.9577 27.8791 23.5252 0.0782 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 8.7698 3.6823 12.4521 3.6111 3.3877 6.9988Total6.9711 79.4263 51.4904 0.0749 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 3.6823 3.6823 3.3877 3.3877Off-Road 6.9711 79.4263 51.4904 0.0749 0.0000 0.00008.7698 0.0000 8.7698 3.6111 0.0000 3.6111Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.4 Grading - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 13 of 26 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 1.2182 1.2182 1.1207 1.1207Total2.2300 23.9558 16.3151 0.0300 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 1.2182 1.2182 1.1207 1.1207Off-Road 2.2300 23.9558 16.3151 0.0300 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.5 Trenching - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 8,006.506 8 8,006.5068 0.0678 8,007.930 0 2.1267 0.4073 2.5340 0.5800 0.3746 0.9547Total2.0374 27.9865 24.6539 0.0813 247.9129 247.9129 0.0119 248.16240.2683 1.8300e- 003 0.2701 0.0711 1.6900e- 003 0.0728Worker0.0797 0.1074 1.1287 3.0800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 7,758.593 9 7,758.5939 0.0559 7,759.767 6 1.8584 0.4055 2.2639 0.5089 0.3730 0.8819Hauling1.9577 27.8791 23.5252 0.0782 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 3.2492 1.5593 4.8085 1.4083 1.5593 2.9676Total1.8345 35.9993 44.9134 0.0749 0.0000 7,657.631 5 7,657.6315 2.3463 7,706.903 4 1.5593 1.5593 1.5593 1.5593Off-Road 1.8345 35.9993 44.9134 0.0749 0.0000 0.00003.2492 0.0000 3.2492 1.4083 0.0000 1.4083Fugitive Dust Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 14 of 26 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222Total0.7342 14.7261 19.6887 0.0300 0.0000 3,063.315 9 3,063.3159 0.9386 3,083.026 4 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222 0.7222Off-Road 0.7342 14.7261 19.6887 0.0300 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Total0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 144.6159 144.6159 6.9300e- 003 144.76140.1565 1.0700e- 003 0.1576 0.0415 9.9000e- 004 0.0425Worker0.0465 0.0627 0.6584 1.8000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 15 of 26 0.0000 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353Total1.8049 21.3932 27.4738 0.0413 0.0000 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353 1.4353Off-Road 1.8049 21.3932 27.4738 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6,465.679 9 6,465.6799 0.1310 6,468.431 3 3.5357 0.2724 3.8081 0.9632 0.2505 1.2137Total2.5183 17.6406 33.6466 0.0703 2,065.940 7 2,065.9407 0.0990 2,068.020 3 2.2355 0.0153 2.2508 0.5929 0.0141 0.6070Worker0.6641 0.8952 9.4058 0.0257 4,399.739 1 4,399.7391 0.0320 4,400.411 0 1.3002 0.2571 1.5573 0.3703 0.2364 0.6067Vendor1.8542 16.7454 24.2408 0.0446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 2.6023 2.6023 2.4941 2.4941Total4.9325 36.8865 27.5141 0.0413 3,973.075 2 3,973.0752 0.8135 3,990.158 0 2.6023 2.6023 2.4941 2.4941Off-Road 4.9325 36.8865 27.5141 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2017 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 16 of 26 6,313.407 3 6,313.4073 0.1243 6,316.017 0 3.5356 0.2573 3.7929 0.9631 0.2367 1.1998Total2.3345 16.1810 31.7815 0.0702 1,988.451 2 1,988.4512 0.0924 1,990.391 9 2.2355 0.0151 2.2506 0.5929 0.0140 0.6069Worker0.6052 0.8168 8.5870 0.0257 4,324.956 2 4,324.9562 0.0319 4,325.625 1 1.3001 0.2422 1.5423 0.3703 0.2227 0.5930Vendor1.7293 15.3642 23.1945 0.0446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 2.2100 2.2100 2.1205 2.1205Total4.3050 32.9658 26.8085 0.0413 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 2.2100 2.2100 2.1205 2.1205Off-Road 4.3050 32.9658 26.8085 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.6 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6,465.679 9 6,465.6799 0.1310 6,468.431 3 3.5357 0.2724 3.8081 0.9632 0.2505 1.2137Total2.5183 17.6406 33.6466 0.0703 2,065.940 7 2,065.9407 0.0990 2,068.020 3 2.2355 0.0153 2.2508 0.5929 0.0141 0.6070Worker0.6641 0.8952 9.4058 0.0257 4,399.739 1 4,399.7391 0.0320 4,400.411 0 1.3002 0.2571 1.5573 0.3703 0.2364 0.6067Vendor1.8542 16.7454 24.2408 0.0446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 17 of 26 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.9386 0.9386 0.8635 0.8635Total1.7730 17.1628 14.4944 0.0223 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving0.1616 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.9386 0.9386 0.8635 0.8635Off-Road 1.6114 17.1628 14.4944 0.0223 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.7 Paving - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 6,313.407 3 6,313.4073 0.1243 6,316.017 0 3.5356 0.2573 3.7929 0.9631 0.2367 1.1998Total2.3345 16.1810 31.7815 0.0702 1,988.451 2 1,988.4512 0.0924 1,990.391 9 2.2355 0.0151 2.2506 0.5929 0.0140 0.6069Worker0.6052 0.8168 8.5870 0.0257 4,324.956 2 4,324.9562 0.0319 4,325.625 1 1.3001 0.2422 1.5423 0.3703 0.2227 0.5930Vendor1.7293 15.3642 23.1945 0.0446 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068Total1.6866 21.2756 27.3664 0.0413 0.0000 3,943.210 9 3,943.2109 0.7855 3,959.705 7 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068 1.4068Off-Road 1.6866 21.2756 27.3664 0.0413 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 18 of 26 159.0761 159.0761 7.3900e- 003 159.23140.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Total0.0484 0.0653 0.6870 2.0500e- 003 159.0761 159.0761 7.3900e- 003 159.23140.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0484 0.0653 0.6870 2.0500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982Total0.7106 11.0645 16.9276 0.0223 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Paving0.1616 0.0000 2,245.269 5 2,245.2695 0.6990 2,259.948 1 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982 0.5982Off-Road 0.5490 11.0645 16.9276 0.0223 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 159.0761 159.0761 7.3900e- 003 159.23140.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Total0.0484 0.0653 0.6870 2.0500e- 003 159.0761 159.0761 7.3900e- 003 159.23140.1788 1.2100e- 003 0.1801 0.0474 1.1200e- 003 0.0486Worker0.0484 0.0653 0.6870 2.0500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 19 of 26 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Total146.0250 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 994.2256 994.2256 0.0462 995.19591.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Total0.3026 0.4084 4.2935 0.0128 994.2256 994.2256 0.0462 995.19591.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Worker0.3026 0.4084 4.2935 0.0128 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Total146.2642 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 281.4485 281.4485 0.0267 282.01020.1506 0.1506 0.1506 0.1506Off-Road 0.2986 2.0058 1.8542 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coating - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 20 of 26 963.1657 963.1657 0.0441 964.09201.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Total0.2828 0.3785 3.9976 0.0129 963.1657 963.1657 0.0441 964.09201.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Worker0.2828 0.3785 3.9976 0.0129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Total146.2320 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.8 Architectural Coating - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 994.2256 994.2256 0.0462 995.19591.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Total0.3026 0.4084 4.2935 0.0128 994.2256 994.2256 0.0462 995.19591.1178 7.5500e- 003 1.1253 0.2964 6.9900e- 003 0.3034Worker0.3026 0.4084 4.2935 0.0128 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 21 of 26 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network 963.1657 963.1657 0.0441 964.09201.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Total0.2828 0.3785 3.9976 0.0129 963.1657 963.1657 0.0441 964.09201.1178 7.6100e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0600e- 003 0.3035Worker0.2828 0.3785 3.9976 0.0129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Total146.0250 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.94730.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 145.9656 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 22 of 26 0.001457 0.002169 0.004600 0.000497 0.002340 SBUS MH 0.506845 0.056549 0.194099 0.151329 0.042005 0.005959 0.015983 0.016167 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 48.00 19.00 66 28 6 Other Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 City Park 16.60 8.40 6.90 33.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 5,438.59 5,438.59 5,438.59 18,050,822 11,785,914 Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Regional Shopping Center 425.47 425.47 425.47 920,230 600,845 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Other Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 City Park 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 5,013.12 5,013.12 5013.12 17,130,593 11,185,069 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 38,612.30 56 38,612.305 6 1.3815 38,641.31 75 38.1505 0.5175 38.6680 10.1805 0.4778 10.6583Unmitigated14.2730 30.7569 149.9286 0.5125 25,550.59 79 25,550.597 9 0.9373 25,570.28 15 24.9096 0.3533 25.2629 6.6472 0.3262 6.9734 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 12.8534 21.7646 111.5466 0.3392 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 ROG NOx CO Page 23 of 26 2,077.5422 2,077.542 2 0.0398 0.0381 2,090.185 8 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316Total0.1904 1.6277 0.6948 0.0104 2,071.1990 2,071.199 0 0.0397 0.0380 2,083.803 9 0.1312 0.1312 0.1312 0.1312Apartments Mid Rise 17605.2 0.1899 1.6224 0.6904 0.0104 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 6.3433 6.3433 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.38194.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 4.0000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 53.9178 5.8000e- 004 5.2900e- 003 4.4400e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 2,090.185 8 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.1316 2,077.542 2 2,077.5422 0.0398 0.03810.0104 0.1316 0.1316 0.1316 1,658.876 4 1,658.8764 0.0318 0.0304 1,668.972 1 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1904 1.6277 0.6948 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.1521 1.2997 0.5550 8.2900e- 003 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 5.0 Energy Detail Page 24 of 26 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Unmitigated33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 0.0000 13,939.33 13,939.336 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.761.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Mitigated33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 1,658.8764 1,658.876 4 0.0318 0.0304 1,668.972 1 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051 0.1051Total0.1521 1.2997 0.5550 8.3000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000City Park 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,653.3067 1,653.306 7 0.0317 0.0303 1,663.368 5 0.1047 0.1047 0.1047 0.1047Apartments Mid Rise 14.0531 0.1516 1.2951 0.5511 8.2700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Unenclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 5.5697 5.5697 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.60363.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 3.5000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 0.0473425 5.1000e- 004 4.6400e- 003 3.9000e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 25 of 26 0.0000 13,939.33 66 13,939.336 6 0.3732 0.2535 14,025.76 38 1.2163 1.2163 1.2070 1.2070Total33.4464 0.7133 61.8805 3.2600e- 003 111.1013 111.1013 0.1081 113.37220.3405 0.3405 0.3405 0.3405Landscaping1.8811 0.7132 61.8114 3.2600e- 003 0.0000 13,828.23 53 13,828.235 3 0.2650 0.2535 13,912.39 16 0.8758 0.8758 0.8666 0.8666Hearth1.2676 6.0000e- 005 0.0691 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 28.8084 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 1.4893 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 26 of 26 Trips and VMT - Default trips and VMT assumed. Demolition - Architectural Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Vehicle Trips - Updated trip generation based on traffic study. Woodstoves - Comply with SCAQMD regulation which prohibits wood-burning fireplaces or woodstoves. 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Jefferson Stadium Park Project. Orange County (South Coast Air Basin). Land Use - Building 3 consists of developing 333 apartment units, a 614 space parking garage, and 9,800 square feet of retail space on 4.35 acres. Construction Phase - Construction for Building 3 would start February 2018 and would finish September 2020. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1543.28 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Regional Shopping Center 9.80 1000sqft 0.00 9,800.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 333.00 Dwelling Unit 2.22 306,482.00 952 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 2.13 Acre 2.13 92,782.80 0 Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 614.00 Space 0.00 189,696.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 5/2/2016 10:26 AM Jefferson Stadium Park project - Building 3 Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 17 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 33.30 42.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 16.65 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberGas 283.05 291.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 18.00 44.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 630.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteri orValue 50 250 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 146139 21849 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 438418 14700 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 438,418.00 14,700.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 Waste Mitigation - Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 146,139.00 21,849.00 Area Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Energy Use - Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water exposed area three times per day. Maintain vehicle speeds of 15 mph. Use of Tier-3 construction equipment.Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Existing project site conditions. Energy Mitigation - Title 24 standards will lead to 25% less energy consumption for residential buildings. Water Mitigation - Use of water efficient fixtures per SEIR. Page 2 of 17 0.0000 2,000.316 6 2,000.3166 0.1942 0.0000 2,004.394 1 0.8787 0.5516 1.4303 0.2366 0.5296 0.7662Total2.3492 9.5869 12.5639 0.0249 0.0000 425.9531 425.9531 0.0398 0.0000 426.78900.2018 0.0985 0.3004 0.0543 0.0947 0.148920201.2591 1.8166 2.6220 5.4600e- 003 0.0000 817.3366 817.3366 0.0792 0.0000 819.00040.3540 0.2203 0.5743 0.0954 0.2115 0.306820190.5409 3.8898 5.1201 0.0102 0.0000 757.0269 757.0269 0.0751 0.0000 758.60480.3228 0.2328 0.5556 0.0870 0.2235 0.310420180.5491 3.8806 4.8218 9.2700e- 003 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 16.65 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 16.65 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 6.72 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.94 44.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.72 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 44.32 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.32 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 362.00 200.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 72.00 100.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.22 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2021 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.53 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.76 2.22 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 245,600.00 189,696.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 333,000.00 306,482.00 Page 3 of 17 40.2965 5,406.513 3 5,446.8098 2.8497 0.0296 5,515.814 2 3.2444 0.0794 3.3239 0.8670 0.0760 0.9430Total3.6102 2.9015 16.6752 0.0460 7.1135 314.2153 321.3288 0.7365 0.0185 342.52270.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 33.1829 0.0000 33.1829 1.9611 0.0000 74.36510.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 3,068.889 8 3,068.8898 0.1086 0.0000 3,071.170 1 3.2444 0.0448 3.2892 0.8670 0.0414 0.9084Mobile1.1949 2.7285 13.1681 0.0449 0.0000 1,947.903 3 1,947.9033 0.0367 9.8000e- 003 1,951.711 1 0.0108 0.0108 0.0108 0.0108Energy0.0156 0.1332 0.0571 8.5000e- 004 0.0000 75.5050 75.5050 6.8200e- 003 1.2800e- 003 76.04530.0239 0.0239 0.0238 0.0238Area2.3998 0.0398 3.4500 1.8000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-84.08 25.37 -41.87 -76.65 22.77 -7.93 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 26.89 21.16 -0.64 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 2,000.315 5 2,000.3155 0.1942 0.0000 2,004.393 0 1.6175 0.4117 2.0291 0.4179 0.4090 0.8269Total1.7175 7.5581 12.6441 0.0249 0.0000 425.9529 425.9529 0.0398 0.0000 426.78870.3721 0.0858 0.4579 0.0961 0.0853 0.181420201.1459 1.5430 2.6524 5.4600e- 003 0.0000 817.3361 817.3361 0.0792 0.0000 818.99990.6514 0.1692 0.8206 0.1684 0.1681 0.336420190.2904 3.1101 5.1596 0.0102 0.0000 757.0265 757.0265 0.0751 0.0000 758.60430.5940 0.1567 0.7507 0.1535 0.1556 0.309120180.2813 2.9051 4.8322 9.2700e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 4 of 17 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 620,626; Residential Outdoor: 206,875; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,700; Non-Residential Outdoor: 21,849 630 2 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/2/2020 9/1/2020 5 44 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Building Construction Building Construction 2/1/2018 7/1/2020 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date -10.59 17.79 17.58 -14.22 -33.91 17.1533.57 20.00 33.24 33.57 19.54 32.44 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 3.41 27.45 19.85 32.31 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 44.5646 4,444.611 6 4,489.1762 3.2549 0.0396 4,569.796 2 2.1553 0.0636 2.2189 0.5760 0.0611 0.6371Total3.4871 2.1049 13.3647 0.0311 11.3817 533.2793 544.6610 1.1788 0.0296 578.60190.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Water 33.1829 0.0000 33.1829 1.9611 0.0000 74.36510.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Waste 0.0000 2,065.809 3 2,065.8093 0.0749 0.0000 2,067.381 9 2.1553 0.0311 2.1864 0.5760 0.0287 0.6047Mobile1.0749 1.9588 9.8691 0.0303 0.0000 1,770.018 0 1,770.0180 0.0333 8.6600e- 003 1,773.402 0 8.6000e- 003 8.6000e- 003 8.6000e- 003 8.6000e- 003 Energy 0.0124 0.1064 0.0456 6.8000e- 004 0.0000 75.5050 75.5050 6.8200e- 003 1.2800e- 003 76.04530.0239 0.0239 0.0238 0.0238Area2.3998 0.0398 3.4500 1.8000e- 004 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 5 of 17 350.97420.2112 0.0000 349.6345 349.6345 0.0638 0.00004.0200e- 003 0.2194 0.2194 0.2112 349.6345 349.6345 0.0638 0.0000 350.9742 Total 0.4016 3.0279 2.7121 0.2194 0.2194 0.2112 0.2112 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.4016 3.0279 2.7121 4.0200e- 003 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ROG NOx CO SO2 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 11 200.00 84.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Load Factor Building Construction Air Compressors 3 8.00 78 0.48 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Page 6 of 17 0.0000 407.3924 407.3924 0.0113 0.0000 407.63060.5940 0.0134 0.6074 0.1535 0.0123 0.1658Total0.1476 0.8527 2.1097 5.2500e- 003 0.0000 217.9019 217.9019 9.9800e- 003 0.0000 218.11140.4878 1.8000e- 003 0.4896 0.1250 1.6600e- 003 0.1267Worker0.0673 0.0998 1.0444 3.1000e- 003 0.0000 189.4905 189.4905 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 189.51920.1062 0.0116 0.1178 0.0285 0.0106 0.0392Vendor0.0803 0.7529 1.0653 2.1500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 349.6341 349.6341 0.0638 0.0000 350.97380.1433 0.1433 0.1433 0.1433Total0.1337 2.0524 2.7224 4.0200e- 003 0.0000 349.6341 349.6341 0.0638 0.0000 350.97380.1433 0.1433 0.1433 0.1433Off-Road 0.1337 2.0524 2.7224 4.0200e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 407.3924 407.3924 0.0113 0.0000 407.63060.3228 0.0134 0.3362 0.0870 0.0123 0.0993Total0.1476 0.8527 2.1097 5.2500e- 003 0.0000 217.9019 217.9019 9.9800e- 003 0.0000 218.11140.2613 1.8000e- 003 0.2631 0.0694 1.6600e- 003 0.0711Worker0.0673 0.0998 1.0444 3.1000e- 003 0.0000 189.4905 189.4905 1.3600e- 003 0.0000 189.51920.0615 0.0116 0.0731 0.0176 0.0106 0.0282Vendor0.0803 0.7529 1.0653 2.1500e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Page 7 of 17 0.0000 380.9192 380.9192 0.0673 0.0000 382.33200.1553 0.1553 0.1553 0.1553Total0.1392 2.2432 2.9788 4.4000e- 003 0.0000 380.9192 380.9192 0.0673 0.0000 382.33200.1553 0.1553 0.1553 0.1553Off-Road 0.1392 2.2432 2.9788 4.4000e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 436.4170 436.4170 0.0120 0.0000 436.66790.3540 0.0138 0.3678 0.0954 0.0127 0.1081Total0.1512 0.8668 2.1809 5.7800e- 003 0.0000 231.5024 231.5024 0.0104 0.0000 231.72170.2865 1.9900e- 003 0.2885 0.0761 1.8400e- 003 0.0779Worker0.0689 0.1015 1.0671 3.4200e- 003 0.0000 204.9146 204.9146 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 204.94620.0675 0.0118 0.0793 0.0193 0.0109 0.0302Vendor0.0823 0.7654 1.1138 2.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 380.9196 380.9196 0.0673 0.0000 382.33240.2065 0.2065 0.1987 0.1987Total0.3897 3.0229 2.9392 4.4000e- 003 0.0000 380.9196 380.9196 0.0673 0.0000 382.33240.2065 0.2065 0.1987 0.1987Off-Road 0.3897 3.0229 2.9392 4.4000e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 8 of 17 0.0000 212.0571 212.0571 5.7300e- 003 0.0000 212.17760.1777 6.4300e- 003 0.1841 0.0479 5.9200e- 003 0.0538Total0.0708 0.3827 1.0352 2.9000e- 003 0.0000 111.5418 111.5418 4.9900e- 003 0.0000 111.64670.1438 1.0000e- 003 0.1448 0.0382 9.3000e- 004 0.0391Worker0.0327 0.0475 0.5023 1.7200e- 003 0.0000 100.5153 100.5153 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 100.53090.0339 5.4300e- 003 0.0393 9.6700e- 003 4.9900e- 003 0.0147Vendor0.0381 0.3352 0.5329 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 189.5466 189.5466 0.0328 0.0000 190.23530.0895 0.0895 0.0861 0.0861Total0.1763 1.3889 1.4622 2.2100e- 003 0.0000 189.5466 189.5466 0.0328 0.0000 190.23530.0895 0.0895 0.0861 0.0861Off-Road 0.1763 1.3889 1.4622 2.2100e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 436.4170 436.4170 0.0120 0.0000 436.66790.6514 0.0138 0.6652 0.1684 0.0127 0.1811Total0.1512 0.8668 2.1809 5.7800e- 003 0.0000 231.5024 231.5024 0.0104 0.0000 231.72170.5349 1.9900e- 003 0.5369 0.1371 1.8400e- 003 0.1389Worker0.0689 0.1015 1.0671 3.4200e- 003 0.0000 204.9146 204.9146 1.5100e- 003 0.0000 204.94620.1165 0.0118 0.1283 0.0313 0.0109 0.0422Vendor0.0823 0.7654 1.1138 2.3600e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 9 of 17 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.62632.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 Total 1.0066 0.0370 0.0403 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.62632.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 2.4400e- 003 Off-Road 5.3300e- 003 0.0370 0.0403 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 1.0012 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 212.0571 212.0571 5.7300e- 003 0.0000 212.17760.3270 6.4300e- 003 0.3334 0.0845 5.9200e- 003 0.0904Total0.0708 0.3827 1.0352 2.9000e- 003 0.0000 111.5418 111.5418 4.9900e- 003 0.0000 111.64670.2685 1.0000e- 003 0.2695 0.0688 9.3000e- 004 0.0697Worker0.0327 0.0475 0.5023 1.7200e- 003 0.0000 100.5153 100.5153 7.4000e- 004 0.0000 100.53090.0585 5.4300e- 003 0.0639 0.0157 4.9900e- 003 0.0207Vendor0.0381 0.3352 0.5329 1.1800e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 189.5464 189.5464 0.0328 0.0000 190.23510.0771 0.0771 0.0771 0.0771Total0.0671 1.1224 1.4925 2.2100e- 003 0.0000 189.5464 189.5464 0.0328 0.0000 190.23510.0771 0.0771 0.0771 0.0771Off-Road 0.0671 1.1224 1.4925 2.2100e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 10 of 17 0.0000 18.7322 18.7322 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 18.74980.0451 1.7000e- 004 0.0453 0.0116 1.6000e- 004 0.0117Total5.4900e- 003 7.9800e- 003 0.0844 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 18.7322 18.7322 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 18.74980.0451 1.7000e- 004 0.0453 0.0116 1.6000e- 004 0.0117Worker5.4900e- 003 7.9800e- 003 0.0844 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.62632.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 Total 1.0025 0.0299 0.0403 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 5.6172 5.6172 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.62632.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 2.0900e- 003 Off-Road 1.3100e- 003 0.0299 0.0403 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 1.0012 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 18.7322 18.7322 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 18.74980.0242 1.7000e- 004 0.0243 6.4100e- 003 1.6000e- 004 6.5700e- 003 Total 5.4900e- 003 7.9800e- 003 0.0844 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 18.7322 18.7322 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 18.74980.0242 1.7000e- 004 0.0243 6.4100e- 003 1.6000e- 004 6.5700e- 003 Worker 5.4900e- 003 7.9800e- 003 0.0844 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 11 of 17 0.001457 0.002169 0.004600 0.000497 0.002340 SBUS MH 0.506845 0.056549 0.194099 0.151329 0.042005 0.005959 0.015983 0.016167 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 2,672.10 2,672.10 2,672.10 8,586,167 5,703,903 Regional Shopping Center 434.34 434.34 434.34 939,401 624,056 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 2,237.76 2,237.76 2237.76 7,646,766 5,079,847 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 0.0000 3,068.889 8 3,068.8898 0.1086 0.0000 3,071.170 1 3.2444 0.0448 3.2892 0.8670 0.0414 0.9084Unmitigated1.1949 2.7285 13.1681 0.0449 0.0000 2,065.809 3 2,065.8093 0.0749 0.0000 2,067.381 9 2.1553 0.0311 2.1864 0.5760 0.0287 0.6047 CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 1.0749 1.9588 9.8691 0.0303 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network ROG NOx CO Page 12 of 17 155.07870.0108 0.0000 154.1406 154.1406 2.9500e- 003 2.8300e- 003 8.5000e- 004 0.0108 0.0108 0.0108 1.0721 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0786 Total 0.0156 0.1332 0.0571 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.0721 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 20090 1.1000e- 004 9.8000e- 004 8.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 154.0001 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0107 0.0000 153.0685 153.0685 2.9300e- 003 2.8100e- 003 8.4000e- 004 0.0107 0.0107 0.0107Apartments Mid Rise 2.8684e+0 06 0.0155 0.1322 0.0562 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 154.1406 154.1406 2.9500e- 003 2.8300e- 003 155.0787 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas 0.0108 0.0108 0.0108 0.0108 0.0000 2.3600e- 003 2.2600e- 003 123.8755 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0156 0.1332 0.0571 8.5000e- 004 8.6000e- 003 8.6000e- 003 0.0000 123.1262 123.1262 1,796.632 4 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0124 0.1064 0.0456 6.8000e- 004 8.6000e- 003 8.6000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 1,793.762 7 1,793.7627 0.0337 6.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1,646.891 8 1,646.8918 0.0310 6.4000e- 003 1,649.526 5 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 5.0 Energy Detail Page 13 of 17 1,796.632 4 Total 1,793.7627 0.0337 6.9700e- 003 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 125440 87.8105 1.6500e- 003 3.4000e- 004 87.9510 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 812.2382 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1.27855e+ 006 895.0113 0.0168 3.4800e- 003 896.4432 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 1.15845e+ 006 810.9408 0.0152 3.1500e- 003 123.8755 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 8.6000e- 003 0.0000 123.1262 123.1262 2.3600e- 003 2.2600e- 003 6.8000e- 004 8.6000e- 003 8.6000e- 003 8.6000e- 003 122.1849 2.3400e- 003 2.2400e- 003 122.9285 Total 0.0125 0.1064 0.0456 8.5300e- 003 8.5300e- 003 8.5300e- 003 0.0000 122.1849 0.9471 Apartments Mid Rise 2.28966e+ 006 0.0124 0.1055 0.0449 6.7000e- 004 8.5300e- 003 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.9413 0.9413 2.0000e- 005 2.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 17640 1.0000e- 004 8.6000e- 004 7.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Page 14 of 17 0.0000 75.5050 75.5050 6.8200e- 003 1.2800e- 003 76.04530.0239 0.0239 0.0238 0.0238Total2.3998 0.0398 3.4500 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 5.6251 5.6251 5.4800e- 003 0.0000 5.74010.0190 0.0190 0.0190 0.0190Landscaping0.1050 0.0398 3.4496 1.8000e- 004 0.0000 69.8799 69.8799 1.3400e- 003 1.2800e- 003 70.30524.8800e- 003 4.8800e- 003 4.8300e- 003 4.8300e- 003 Hearth 7.0600e- 003 0.0000 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 2.1636 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.1241 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 75.5050 75.5050 6.8200e- 003 1.2800e- 003 76.04530.0239 0.0239 0.0238 0.0238Unmitigated2.3998 0.0398 3.4500 1.8000e- 004 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 1,649.526 5 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Total 1,646.8918 0.0309 6.4000e- 003 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 116669 81.6706 1.5300e- 003 3.2000e- 004 81.8013 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 801.6254 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 1.09265e+ 006 764.8762 0.0144 2.9700e- 003 766.0998 Land Use kWh/yr t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 1.14332e+ 006 800.3450 0.0150 3.1100e- 003 Mitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Page 15 of 17 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr 342.5227 Mitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Total 321.3288 0.7365 0.0185 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.725911 / 0.444913 10.3071 0.0238 6.0000e- 004 10.9931 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 331.5296 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use Mgal t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 21.6963 / 13.6781 311.0217 0.7127 0.0179 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 321.3288 0.7365 0.0185 342.5227 Category t o n MT/yr Mitigated 544.6610 1.1788 0.0296 578.6019 Use Water Efficient Irrigation System Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Page 16 of 17 74.3651Total33.1829 1.9611 0.0000 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 10.29 2.0888 0.1234 0.0000 4.6811 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 69.6840 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Land Use tons t o n MT/yr Apartments Mid Rise 153.18 31.0942 1.8376 0.0000 8.2 Waste by Land Use Unmitigated Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Unmitigated 33.1829 1.9611 0.0000 74.3651 t o n MT/yr Mitigated 33.1829 1.9611 0.0000 74.3651 578.6019 8.0 Waste Detail 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Category/Year Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Total 544.6610 1.1788 0.0296 0.0000 Regional Shopping Center 0.580729 / 0.417773 17.4534 0.0382 9.6000e- 004 18.5519 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 560.0501 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Apartments Mid Rise 17.357 / 12.8437 527.2076 1.1407 0.0287 Page 17 of 17 Trips and VMT - Default trips and VMT assumed. Architectural Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Vehicle Trips - Updated trip generation based on traffic study. Woodstoves - Comply with SCAQMD regulation which prohibits wood-burning fireplaces or woodstoves. 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Jefferson Stadium Park Project. Orange County (South Coast Air Basin). Land Use - Building 3 consists of developing 333 apartment units, a 614 space parking garage, and 9,800 square feet of retail space on 4.35 acres. Construction Phase - Construction for Building 3 would start February 2018 and would finish September 2020. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1543.28 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Regional Shopping Center 9.80 1000sqft 0.00 9,800.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 333.00 Dwelling Unit 2.22 306,482.00 952 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 2.13 Acre 2.13 92,782.80 0 Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 614.00 Space 0.00 189,696.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 5/2/2016 10:39 AM Jefferson Stadium Park project - Building 3 Orange County, Summer 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 15 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 33.30 42.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 16.65 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberGas 283.05 291.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 18.00 44.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 630.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteri orValue 50 250 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 146139 21849 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 438418 14700 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 438,418.00 14,700.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 146,139.00 21,849.00 Area Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water exposed area three times per day. Maintain vehicle speeds of 15 mph. Use of Tier-3 construction equipment.Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Existing project site conditions. Energy Mitigation - Title 24 standards will lead to 25% less energy consumption for residential buildings. Water Mitigation - Use of water efficient fixtures per SEIR. Page 2 of 15 0.0000 20,929.48 98 20,929.489 8 2.0131 0.0000 20,971.76 47 8.2818 5.1076 13.3894 2.2273 4.9028 7.1301Total54.7136 88.4976 115.2111 0.2373 0.0000 6,840.517 8 6,840.5178 0.6482 0.0000 6,854.130 6 2.7606 1.4642 4.2248 0.7424 1.4053 2.1477202046.0073 26.7606 37.2347 0.0791 0.0000 6,988.992 1 6,988.9921 0.6691 0.0000 7,003.042 1 2.7606 1.6877 4.4483 0.7424 1.6200 2.362420194.1205 29.4810 38.3464 0.0792 0.0000 7,099.979 9 7,099.9799 0.6958 0.0000 7,114.592 0 2.7606 1.9557 4.7163 0.7424 1.8775 2.619920184.5858 32.2559 39.6301 0.0790 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 16.65 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 16.65 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 6.72 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.94 44.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.72 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 44.32 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.32 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 362.00 200.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 72.00 100.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.22 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2021 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.53 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.76 2.22 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 245,600.00 189,696.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 333,000.00 306,482.00 Page 3 of 15 0.0000 26,350.53 40 26,350.534 0 0.8425 0.1301 26,408.54 06 18.1469 0.8474 18.9943 4.8425 0.8244 5.6670Total20.6287 14.9656 100.4798 0.2616 19,207.55 75 19,207.557 5 0.6583 19,221.38 06 18.1469 0.2462 18.3931 4.8425 0.2273 5.0698Mobile6.6028 13.9176 72.5395 0.2555 931.0187 931.0187 0.0178 0.0171 936.68470.0590 0.0590 0.0590 0.0590Energy0.0853 0.7296 0.3127 4.6600e- 003 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Area13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-84.28 23.89 -43.02 -76.92 21.22 -9.44 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 7.96 20.61 -0.74 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 20,929.48 98 20,929.489 8 2.0131 0.0000 20,971.76 47 15.2618 3.8876 19.1493 3.9405 3.8626 7.8031Total50.3606 70.2578 116.0638 0.2373 0.0000 6,840.517 8 6,840.5178 0.6482 0.0000 6,854.130 6 5.0873 1.2754 6.3627 1.3135 1.2677 2.5812202045.8246 22.6933 37.6971 0.0791 0.0000 6,988.992 1 6,988.9921 0.6691 0.0000 7,003.042 1 5.0873 1.2959 6.3832 1.3135 1.2876 2.601120192.2015 23.5062 38.6496 0.0792 0.0000 7,099.979 9 7,099.9799 0.6958 0.0000 7,114.592 0 5.0872 1.3162 6.4034 1.3135 1.3073 2.620820182.3346 24.0582 39.7171 0.0790 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 4 of 15 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 620,626; Residential Outdoor: 206,875; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,700; Non-Residential Outdoor: 21,849 630 2 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/2/2020 9/1/2020 5 44 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Building Construction Building Construction 2/1/2018 7/1/2020 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date 0.00 24.55 24.55 24.68 2.65 24.5133.57 10.31 32.53 33.57 9.90 30.12 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 3.34 26.96 19.35 32.30 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 19,882.04 61 19,882.046 1 0.6345 0.1266 19,934.62 11 12.0552 0.7600 12.8152 3.2170 0.7428 3.9598Total19.9393 10.9314 81.0393 0.1771 12,926.39 83 12,926.398 3 0.4539 12,935.92 99 12.0552 0.1706 12.2259 3.2170 0.1576 3.3745Mobile5.9306 10.0301 53.1618 0.1719 743.6899 743.6899 0.0143 0.0136 748.21590.0471 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471Energy0.0682 0.5828 0.2500 3.7200e- 003 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Area13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 5 of 15 3,251.116 0 1.7745 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.59090.0338 1.8438 1.8438 1.7745 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.5909 3,251.116 0 Total 3.3746 25.4448 22.7906 1.8438 1.8438 1.7745 1.7745 Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3746 25.4448 22.7906 0.0338 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ROG NOx CO SO2 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 11 200.00 84.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Load Factor Building Construction Air Compressors 3 8.00 78 0.48 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Page 6 of 15 3,861.273 8 3,861.2738 0.1049 3,863.476 1 5.0872 0.1119 5.1992 1.3135 0.1031 1.4165Total1.2112 6.8111 16.8394 0.0453 2,099.731 7 2,099.7317 0.0924 2,101.672 4 4.1790 0.0151 4.1941 1.0699 0.0140 1.0839Worker0.5766 0.7428 9.1718 0.0271 1,761.542 1 1,761.5421 0.0125 1,761.803 7 0.9082 0.0969 1.0050 0.2436 0.0891 0.3326Vendor0.6345 6.0683 7.6676 0.0181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.5909 3,251.116 0 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042Total1.1234 17.2471 22.8777 0.0338 0.0000 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.5909 3,251.116 0 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042Off-Road 1.1234 17.2471 22.8777 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,861.273 8 3,861.2738 0.1049 3,863.476 1 2.7606 0.1119 2.8725 0.7424 0.1031 0.8455Total1.2112 6.8111 16.8394 0.0453 2,099.731 7 2,099.7317 0.0924 2,101.672 4 2.2355 0.0151 2.2506 0.5929 0.0140 0.6069Worker0.5766 0.7428 9.1718 0.0271 1,761.542 1 1,761.5421 0.0125 1,761.803 7 0.5250 0.0969 0.6219 0.1495 0.0891 0.2386Vendor0.6345 6.0683 7.6676 0.0181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Page 7 of 15 0.0000 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904Total1.0669 17.1894 22.8258 0.0338 0.0000 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904Off-Road 1.0669 17.1894 22.8258 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,771.429 0 3,771.4290 0.1008 3,773.545 0 2.7606 0.1056 2.8662 0.7424 0.0972 0.8396Total1.1346 6.3168 15.8237 0.0454 2,034.375 7 2,034.3757 0.0882 2,036.228 3 2.2355 0.0152 2.2508 0.5929 0.0141 0.6070Worker0.5395 0.6884 8.5626 0.0273 1,737.053 3 1,737.0533 0.0125 1,737.316 7 0.5251 0.0904 0.6154 0.1495 0.0831 0.2327Vendor0.5951 5.6284 7.2612 0.0182 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.5821 1.5821 1.5228 1.5228Total2.9859 23.1642 22.5227 0.0338 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.5821 1.5821 1.5228 1.5228Off-Road 2.9859 23.1642 22.5227 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 8 of 15 3,650.603 5 3,650.6035 0.0963 3,652.626 7 2.7606 0.0979 2.8585 0.7424 0.0901 0.8326Total1.0608 5.5568 14.9114 0.0454 1,952.960 6 1,952.9606 0.0841 1,954.725 5 2.2355 0.0153 2.2508 0.5929 0.0142 0.6071Worker0.5105 0.6429 8.0406 0.0273 1,697.643 0 1,697.6430 0.0123 1,697.901 1 0.5251 0.0826 0.6077 0.1496 0.0760 0.2255Vendor0.5503 4.9140 6.8709 0.0181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.3663 1.3663 1.3152 1.3152Total2.6918 21.2038 22.3232 0.0338 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.3663 1.3663 1.3152 1.3152Off-Road 2.6918 21.2038 22.3232 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,771.429 0 3,771.4290 0.1008 3,773.545 0 5.0873 0.1056 5.1928 1.3135 0.0972 1.4107Total1.1346 6.3168 15.8237 0.0454 2,034.375 7 2,034.3757 0.0882 2,036.228 3 4.1790 0.0152 4.1943 1.0699 0.0141 1.0840Worker0.5395 0.6884 8.5626 0.0273 1,737.053 3 1,737.0533 0.0125 1,737.316 7 0.9082 0.0904 0.9986 0.2436 0.0831 0.3267Vendor0.5951 5.6284 7.2612 0.0182 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 9 of 15 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Total45.7521 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 45.5099 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,650.603 5 3,650.6035 0.0963 3,652.626 7 5.0873 0.0979 5.1851 1.3135 0.0901 1.4037Total1.0608 5.5568 14.9114 0.0454 1,952.960 6 1,952.9606 0.0841 1,954.725 5 4.1790 0.0153 4.1943 1.0699 0.0142 1.0841Worker0.5105 0.6429 8.0406 0.0273 1,697.643 0 1,697.6430 0.0123 1,697.901 1 0.9083 0.0826 0.9908 0.2436 0.0760 0.3196Vendor0.5503 4.9140 6.8709 0.0181 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776Total1.0238 17.1365 22.7857 0.0338 0.0000 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776Off-Road 1.0238 17.1365 22.7857 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 10 of 15 976.4803 976.4803 0.0420 977.36282.0895 7.6400e- 003 2.0972 0.5350 7.0900e- 003 0.5421Total0.2552 0.3214 4.0203 0.0136 976.4803 976.4803 0.0420 977.36282.0895 7.6400e- 003 2.0972 0.5350 7.0900e- 003 0.5421Worker0.2552 0.3214 4.0203 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Total45.5693 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 45.5099 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 976.4803 976.4803 0.0420 977.36281.1178 7.6400e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0900e- 003 0.3035Total0.2552 0.3214 4.0203 0.0136 976.4803 976.4803 0.0420 977.36281.1178 7.6400e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0900e- 003 0.3035Worker0.2552 0.3214 4.0203 0.0136 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 11 of 15 0.001457 0.002169 0.004600 0.000497 0.002340 SBUS MH 0.506845 0.056549 0.194099 0.151329 0.042005 0.005959 0.015983 0.016167 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 2,672.10 2,672.10 2,672.10 8,586,167 5,703,903 Regional Shopping Center 434.34 434.34 434.34 939,401 624,056 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 2,237.76 2,237.76 2237.76 7,646,766 5,079,847 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 19,207.55 75 19,207.557 5 0.6583 19,221.38 06 18.1469 0.2462 18.3931 4.8425 0.2273 5.0698Unmitigated6.6028 13.9176 72.5395 0.2555 12,926.39 83 12,926.398 3 0.4539 12,935.92 99 12.0552 0.1706 12.2259 3.2170 0.1576 3.3745 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 5.9306 10.0301 53.1618 0.1719 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network ROG NOx CO Page 12 of 15 931.0187 931.0187 0.0178 0.0171 936.68470.0590 0.0590 0.0590 0.0590Total0.0853 0.7296 0.3127 4.6500e- 003 6.4754 6.4754 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.51484.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 55.0411 5.9000e- 004 5.4000e- 003 4.5300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 924.5432 924.5432 0.0177 0.0170 930.16990.0586 0.0586 0.0586 0.0586Apartments Mid Rise 7858.62 0.0848 0.7242 0.3082 4.6200e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 931.0187 931.0187 0.0178 0.0171 936.68470.0590 0.0590 0.0590 0.0590NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0853 0.7296 0.3127 4.6600e- 003 743.6899 743.6899 0.0143 0.0136 748.21590.0471 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0682 0.5828 0.2500 3.7200e- 003 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Kilowatt Hours of Renewable Electricity Generated ROG NOx CO 5.0 Energy Detail Page 13 of 15 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Total13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 49.6049 49.6049 0.0483 50.61930.1520 0.1520 0.1520 0.1520Landscaping0.8402 0.3184 27.5968 1.4600e- 003 0.0000 6,162.352 9 6,162.3529 0.1181 0.1130 6,199.856 0 0.3903 0.3903 0.3862 0.3862Hearth0.5649 3.0000e- 005 0.0308 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 11.8555 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.6800 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Unmitigated13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 0.0000 6,211.957 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.4750.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Mitigated13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 743.6900 743.6900 0.0143 0.0136 748.21590.0471 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471Total0.0682 0.5828 0.2500 3.7200e- 003 738.0042 738.0042 0.0142 0.0135 742.49560.0467 0.0467 0.0467 0.0467Apartments Mid Rise 6.27304 0.0677 0.5781 0.2460 3.6900e- 003 5.6857 5.6857 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.72033.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 0.0483288 5.2000e- 004 4.7400e- 003 3.9800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 14 of 15 Page 15 of 15 Trips and VMT - Default trips and VMT assumed. Architectural Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Vehicle Trips - Updated trip generation based on traffic study. Woodstoves - Comply with SCAQMD regulation which prohibits wood-burning fireplaces or woodstoves. 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data Project Characteristics - Jefferson Stadium Park Project. Orange County (South Coast Air Basin). Land Use - Building 3 consists of developing 333 apartment units, a 614 space parking garage, and 9,800 square feet of retail space on 4.35 acres. Construction Phase - Construction for Building 3 would start February 2018 and would finish September 2020. Off-road Equipment - Default construction equipment assumed. Off-road Equipment - Construction equipment adjusted per client. CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 1543.28 CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.029 N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006 30 Climate Zone 8 Operational Year 2021 Utility Company Anaheim Public Utilities 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Urban Wind Speed (m/s)2.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) Regional Shopping Center 9.80 1000sqft 0.00 9,800.00 0 Apartments Mid Rise 333.00 Dwelling Unit 2.22 306,482.00 952 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 2.13 Acre 2.13 92,782.80 0 Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 614.00 Space 0.00 189,696.00 0 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 5/2/2016 11:06 AM Jefferson Stadium Park project - Building 3 Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics Page 1 of 14 tblFireplaces NumberNoFireplace 33.30 42.00 tblFireplaces NumberWood 16.65 0.00 tblFireplaces FireplaceWoodMass 1,019.20 0.00 tblFireplaces NumberGas 283.05 291.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 18.00 44.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 230.00 630.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation Tier No Change Tier 3 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 3.00 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 1.00 tblAreaMitigation UseLowVOCPaintNonresidentialExteri orValue 50 250 tblConstEquipMitigation NumberOfEquipmentMitigated 0.00 4.00 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Exterior 146139 21849 tblAreaCoating Area_Nonresidential_Interior 438418 14700 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250 50 tblAreaCoating Area_EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250 50 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Residential_Exterior 100.00 50.00 tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Interior 438,418.00 14,700.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 50.00 Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating ConstArea_Nonresidential_Exterior 146,139.00 21,849.00 Area Coating - Adjusted NonRes Interior and Exterior SF. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Water exposed area three times per day. Maintain vehicle speeds of 15 mph. Use of Tier-3 construction equipment. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Existing project site conditions. Energy Mitigation - Title 24 standards will lead to 25% less energy consumption for residential buildings. Water Mitigation - Use of water efficient fixtures per SEIR. Page 2 of 14 0.0000 20,562.34 20 20,562.342 0 2.0143 0.0000 20,604.64 31 8.2818 5.1101 13.3919 2.2273 4.9052 7.1324Total54.9010 89.0691 118.5883 0.2326 0.0000 6,722.321 8 6,722.3218 0.6487 0.0000 6,735.943 5 2.7606 1.4649 4.2255 0.7424 1.4060 2.1484202046.0196 26.9293 38.3748 0.0776 0.0000 6,866.246 1 6,866.2461 0.6695 0.0000 6,880.304 7 2.7606 1.6885 4.4492 0.7424 1.6208 2.363220194.2031 29.6734 39.4690 0.0776 0.0000 6,973.774 2 6,973.7742 0.6962 0.0000 6,988.394 9 2.7606 1.9567 4.7172 0.7424 1.8784 2.620820184.6782 32.4664 40.7446 0.0774 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total tblWoodstoves WoodstoveWoodMass 999.60 0.00 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) tblWoodstoves NumberCatalytic 16.65 0.00 tblWoodstoves NumberNoncatalytic 16.65 0.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 6.59 6.72 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 42.94 44.32 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 6.07 6.72 tblVehicleTrips SU_TR 25.24 44.32 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 7.16 6.72 tblVehicleTrips ST_TR 49.97 44.32 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 362.00 200.00 tblTripsAndVMT WorkerTripNumber 72.00 100.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.22 0.00 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2021 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.53 0.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 8.76 2.22 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 245,600.00 189,696.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 333,000.00 306,482.00 Page 3 of 14 0.0000 25,524.85 99 25,524.859 9 0.8430 0.1301 25,582.87 68 18.1469 0.8481 18.9950 4.8425 0.8250 5.6676Total20.9744 15.7540 99.8722 0.2501 18,381.88 34 18,381.883 4 0.6587 18,395.71 68 18.1469 0.2468 18.3937 4.8425 0.2279 5.0704Mobile6.9486 14.7059 71.9319 0.2440 931.0187 931.0187 0.0178 0.0171 936.68470.0590 0.0590 0.0590 0.0590Energy0.0853 0.7296 0.3127 4.6600e- 003 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Area13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00-84.28 23.87 -43.01 -76.92 21.21 -9.44 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 7.93 20.48 -0.72 0.00 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 20,562.34 20 20,562.342 0 2.0143 0.0000 20,604.64 31 15.2618 3.8901 19.1518 3.9405 3.8649 7.8054Total50.5480 70.8293 119.4410 0.2326 0.0000 6,722.321 8 6,722.3218 0.6487 0.0000 6,735.943 5 5.0873 1.2762 6.3635 1.3135 1.2684 2.5819202045.8369 22.8620 38.8372 0.0776 0.0000 6,866.246 1 6,866.2461 0.6695 0.0000 6,880.304 7 5.0873 1.2968 6.3841 1.3135 1.2884 2.601920192.2840 23.6986 39.7721 0.0776 0.0000 6,973.774 2 6,973.7742 0.6962 0.0000 6,988.394 9 5.0872 1.3171 6.4043 1.3135 1.3082 2.621620182.4270 24.2687 40.8316 0.0774 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 4 of 14 Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 0 Acres of Paving: 0 Residential Indoor: 620,626; Residential Outdoor: 206,875; Non-Residential Indoor: 14,700; Non-Residential Outdoor: 21,849 630 2 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 7/2/2020 9/1/2020 5 44 End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Building Construction Building Construction 2/1/2018 7/1/2020 5 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date 0.00 24.28 24.28 24.67 2.65 24.2433.57 10.31 32.53 33.57 9.89 30.12 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 3.20 27.19 17.74 32.26 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive PM10 0.0000 19,328.29 89 19,328.298 9 0.6350 0.1266 19,380.88 40 12.0552 0.7607 12.8159 3.2170 0.7435 3.9604Total20.3042 11.4701 82.1512 0.1694 12,372.65 11 12,372.651 1 0.4544 12,382.19 29 12.0552 0.1713 12.2265 3.2170 0.1582 3.3751Mobile6.2955 10.5689 54.2736 0.1643 743.6899 743.6899 0.0143 0.0136 748.21590.0471 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471Energy0.0682 0.5828 0.2500 3.7200e- 003 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Area13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 5 of 14 3,251.116 0 1.7745 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.59090.0338 1.8438 1.8438 1.7745 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.5909 3,251.116 0 Total 3.3746 25.4448 22.7906 1.8438 1.8438 1.7745 1.7745 Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 3.3746 25.4448 22.7906 0.0338 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total ROG NOx CO SO2 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Use Cleaner Engines for Construction Equipment Water Exposed Area Reduce Vehicle Speed on Unpaved Roads 3.2 Building Construction - 2018 Unmitigated Construction On-Site 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 100.00 0.00 0.00 Building Construction 11 200.00 84.00 0.00 14.70 Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Building Construction Welders 1 8.00 46 0.45 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Forklifts 3 8.00 89 0.20 Load Factor Building Construction Air Compressors 3 8.00 78 0.48 OffRoad Equipment Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Page 6 of 14 3,735.068 1 3,735.0681 0.1053 3,737.278 9 5.0872 0.1129 5.2001 1.3135 0.1039 1.4174Total1.3036 7.0215 17.9540 0.0437 1,988.451 2 1,988.4512 0.0924 1,990.391 9 4.1790 0.0151 4.1941 1.0699 0.0140 1.0839Worker0.6052 0.8168 8.5870 0.0257 1,746.616 9 1,746.6169 0.0129 1,746.887 1 0.9082 0.0978 1.0060 0.2436 0.0899 0.3335Vendor0.6984 6.2048 9.3670 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.5909 3,251.116 0 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042Total1.1234 17.2471 22.8777 0.0338 0.0000 3,238.706 1 3,238.7061 0.5909 3,251.116 0 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042 1.2042Off-Road 1.1234 17.2471 22.8777 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,735.068 1 3,735.0681 0.1053 3,737.278 9 2.7606 0.1129 2.8735 0.7424 0.1039 0.8463Total1.3036 7.0215 17.9540 0.0437 1,988.451 2 1,988.4512 0.0924 1,990.391 9 2.2355 0.0151 2.2506 0.5929 0.0140 0.6069Worker0.6052 0.8168 8.5870 0.0257 1,746.616 9 1,746.6169 0.0129 1,746.887 1 0.5250 0.0978 0.6228 0.1495 0.0899 0.2395Vendor0.6984 6.2048 9.3670 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Page 7 of 14 0.0000 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904Total1.0669 17.1894 22.8258 0.0338 0.0000 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904 1.1904Off-Road 1.0669 17.1894 22.8258 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,648.683 0 3,648.6830 0.1012 3,650.807 6 2.7606 0.1064 2.8670 0.7424 0.0980 0.8404Total1.2172 6.5092 16.9463 0.0438 1,926.331 5 1,926.3315 0.0882 1,928.184 1 2.2355 0.0152 2.2508 0.5929 0.0141 0.6070Worker0.5657 0.7569 7.9953 0.0258 1,722.351 5 1,722.3515 0.0130 1,722.623 6 0.5251 0.0912 0.6163 0.1495 0.0839 0.2334Vendor0.6515 5.7523 8.9510 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.5821 1.5821 1.5228 1.5228Total2.9859 23.1642 22.5227 0.0338 3,217.563 1 3,217.5631 0.5683 3,229.497 1 1.5821 1.5821 1.5228 1.5228Off-Road 2.9859 23.1642 22.5227 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Building Construction - 2019 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 8 of 14 3,532.407 5 3,532.4075 0.0968 3,534.439 6 2.7606 0.0986 2.8592 0.7424 0.0908 0.8332Total1.1349 5.7255 16.0515 0.0438 1,849.175 4 1,849.1754 0.0841 1,850.940 4 2.2355 0.0153 2.2508 0.5929 0.0142 0.6071Worker0.5351 0.7066 7.4962 0.0258 1,683.232 1 1,683.2321 0.0127 1,683.499 2 0.5251 0.0833 0.6084 0.1496 0.0766 0.2262Vendor0.5998 5.0189 8.5553 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.3663 1.3663 1.3152 1.3152Total2.6918 21.2038 22.3232 0.0338 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.3663 1.3663 1.3152 1.3152Off-Road 2.6918 21.2038 22.3232 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.2 Building Construction - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,648.683 0 3,648.6830 0.1012 3,650.807 6 5.0873 0.1064 5.1937 1.3135 0.0980 1.4115Total1.2172 6.5092 16.9463 0.0438 1,926.331 5 1,926.3315 0.0882 1,928.184 1 4.1790 0.0152 4.1943 1.0699 0.0141 1.0840Worker0.5657 0.7569 7.9953 0.0258 1,722.351 5 1,722.3515 0.0130 1,722.623 6 0.9082 0.0912 0.9994 0.2436 0.0839 0.3275Vendor0.6515 5.7523 8.9510 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 9 of 14 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Total45.7521 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.1109 0.1109 0.1109 0.1109Off-Road 0.2422 1.6838 1.8314 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 45.5099 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 3.3 Architectural Coating - 2020 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 3,532.407 5 3,532.4075 0.0968 3,534.439 6 5.0873 0.0986 5.1859 1.3135 0.0908 1.4043Total1.1349 5.7255 16.0515 0.0438 1,849.175 4 1,849.1754 0.0841 1,850.940 4 4.1790 0.0153 4.1943 1.0699 0.0142 1.0841Worker0.5351 0.7066 7.4962 0.0258 1,683.232 1 1,683.2321 0.0127 1,683.499 2 0.9083 0.0833 0.9915 0.2436 0.0766 0.3202Vendor0.5998 5.0189 8.5553 0.0180 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776Total1.0238 17.1365 22.7857 0.0338 0.0000 3,189.914 3 3,189.9143 0.5519 3,201.503 9 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776 1.1776Off-Road 1.0238 17.1365 22.7857 0.0338 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 10 of 14 924.5877 924.5877 0.0420 925.47022.0895 7.6400e- 003 2.0972 0.5350 7.0900e- 003 0.5421Total0.2676 0.3533 3.7481 0.0129 924.5877 924.5877 0.0420 925.47022.0895 7.6400e- 003 2.0972 0.5350 7.0900e- 003 0.5421Worker0.2676 0.3533 3.7481 0.0129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Total45.5693 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0218 281.90570.0951 0.0951 0.0951 0.0951Off-Road 0.0594 1.3570 1.8324 2.9700e- 003 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Archit. Coating 45.5099 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 924.5877 924.5877 0.0420 925.47021.1178 7.6400e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0900e- 003 0.3035Total0.2676 0.3533 3.7481 0.0129 924.5877 924.5877 0.0420 925.47021.1178 7.6400e- 003 1.1254 0.2964 7.0900e- 003 0.3035Worker0.2676 0.3533 3.7481 0.0129 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Vendor0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Hauling0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 11 of 14 0.001457 0.002169 0.004600 0.000497 0.002340 SBUS MH 0.506845 0.056549 0.194099 0.151329 0.042005 0.005959 0.015983 0.016167 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY 64.70 19.00 54 35 11 LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Regional Shopping Center 16.60 8.40 6.90 16.30 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 19.20 40.60 86 11 3 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Apartments Mid Rise 14.70 5.90 8.70 40.20 4.3 Trip Type Information Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C- W Total 2,672.10 2,672.10 2,672.10 8,586,167 5,703,903 Regional Shopping Center 434.34 434.34 434.34 939,401 624,056 Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0.00 0.00 0.00 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Annual VMT Apartments Mid Rise 2,237.76 2,237.76 2237.76 7,646,766 5,079,847 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT 18,381.88 34 18,381.883 4 0.6587 18,395.71 68 18.1469 0.2468 18.3937 4.8425 0.2279 5.0704Unmitigated6.9486 14.7059 71.9319 0.2440 12,372.65 11 12,372.651 1 0.4544 12,382.19 29 12.0552 0.1713 12.2265 3.2170 0.1582 3.3751 CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 6.2955 10.5689 54.2736 0.1643 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2OSO2Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile Increase Diversity Increase Transit Accessibility Improve Pedestrian Network ROG NOx CO Page 12 of 14 931.0187 931.0187 0.0178 0.0171 936.68470.0590 0.0590 0.0590 0.0590Total0.0853 0.7296 0.3127 4.6500e- 003 6.4754 6.4754 1.2000e- 004 1.2000e- 004 6.51484.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 4.1000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 55.0411 5.9000e- 004 5.4000e- 003 4.5300e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 924.5432 924.5432 0.0177 0.0170 930.16990.0586 0.0586 0.0586 0.0586Apartments Mid Rise 7858.62 0.0848 0.7242 0.3082 4.6200e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 936.6847 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 0.0590 931.0187 931.0187 0.0178 0.01714.6600e- 003 0.0590 0.0590 0.0590 743.6899 743.6899 0.0143 0.0136 748.2159 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0853 0.7296 0.3127 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471 Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0682 0.5828 0.2500 3.7200e- 003 Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2eFugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total 4.4 Fleet Mix Historical Energy Use: N 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 ROG NOx CO SO2 5.0 Energy Detail Page 13 of 14 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Total13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 49.6049 49.6049 0.0483 50.61930.1520 0.1520 0.1520 0.1520Landscaping0.8402 0.3184 27.5968 1.4600e- 003 0.0000 6,162.352 9 6,162.3529 0.1181 0.1130 6,199.856 0 0.3903 0.3903 0.3862 0.3862Hearth0.5649 3.0000e- 005 0.0308 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Consumer Products 11.8555 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Architectural Coating 0.6800 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 0.0000 6,211.957 9 6,211.9579 0.1664 0.1130 6,250.475 2 0.5423 0.5423 0.5382 0.5382Unmitigated13.9405 0.3184 27.6276 1.4600e- 003 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 743.6900 743.6900 0.0143 0.0136 748.21590.0471 0.0471 0.0471 0.0471Total0.0682 0.5828 0.2500 3.7200e- 003 5.6857 5.6857 1.1000e- 004 1.0000e- 004 5.72033.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 Regional Shopping Center 0.0483288 5.2000e- 004 4.7400e- 003 3.9800e- 003 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Other Non-Asphalt Surfaces 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.00000.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 738.0042 738.0042 0.0142 0.0135 742.49560.0467 0.0467 0.0467 0.0467Apartments Mid Rise 6.27304 0.0677 0.5781 0.2460 3.6900e- 003 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Mitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 Page 14 of 14 APPENDIX C Biological Resources APPENDIX C1 Plant Compendium 8289 C1-1 May 2016 MONOCOTS POACEAE—GRASS FAMILY *Bromus hordeaceus—soft brome *Hordeum vulgare—common barley EUDICOTS BRASSICACEAE—MUSTARD FAMILY *Sisymbrium irio—London rocket CHENOPODIACEAE—GOOSEFOOT FAMILY *Chenopodium album—lambsquarters *Salsola tragus—prickly Russian thistle FABACEAE—LEGUME FAMILY Lupinus bicolor—miniature lupine *Melilotus albus—yellow sweetclover GERANIACEAE—GERANIUM FAMILY *Erodium botrys—longbeak stork’s bill MALVACEAE—MALLOW FAMILY Malvella leprosa—alkali mallow *Malva parviflora—cheeseweed mallow MYRTACEAE—MYRTLE FAMILY *Melaleuca quinquenervia—paperbark PODOCARPACEAE—PODOCARPUS FAMILY *Podocarpus gracilior—fern pine ROSACEAE—ROSE FAMILY *Pyrus calleryana—Callery pear SALICACEAE—WILLOW FAMILY Populus fremontii—Fremont cottonwood SAPINDACEAE—SOAPBERRY FAMILY *Cupaniopsis anacardioides—carrot wood * signifies introduced (non-native) species APPENDIX C1 (Continued) 8289 C1-2 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK APPENDIX C2 Wildlife Compendium 8289 C2-1 May 2016 BIRD Calypte anna—Anna’s hummingbird Corvus brachyrhynchos—American crow Sayornis nigricans—black phoebe Spinus psaltria—lesser goldfinch Sturnella neglecta—western meadowlark Zenaida macroura—mourning dove Haemorhous mexicanus—house finch MAMMAL Thomomys bottae—Botta’s pocket gopher *Canis lupus familiaris—domestic dog * signifies introduced (non-native) species APPENDIX C2 (Continued) 8289 C2-2 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK APPENDIX C3 Special-Status Plants Potentially Occurring within the Study Area 8289 C3-1 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State/CRPR) Primary Habitat Associations/ Life Form/ Blooming Period/ Elevation Range (feet) Potential to Occur Abronia maritima red sand- verbena None/None/4.2 Coastal dunes/ perennial herb/ Feb–Nov/ 0-328 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Abronia villosa var. aurita chaparral sand- verbena None/None/1B.1 Chaparral, coastal scrub, desert dunes; sandy/ annual herb/ Jan–Sep/ 246-5249 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Aphanisma blitoides aphanisma None/None/1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, coastal scrub; sandy or gravelly/ annual herb/ Mar–June/ 3-1001 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Astragalus pycnostachyus var. lanosissimus Ventura marsh milk-vetch FE/CE/1B.1 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, marshes and swamps (edges, coastal salt or brackish)/ perennial herb/ June–Oct/ 3-115 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Atriplex coulteri Coulter’s saltbush None/None/1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland; alkaline or clay/ perennial herb/ Mar–Oct/ 10-1509 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Atriplex pacifica South Coast saltscale None/None/1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, playas/ annual herb/ Mar–Oct/ 0-459 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Atriplex parishii Parish’s brittlescale None/None/1B.1 Chenopod scrub, playas, vernal pools; alkaline/ annual herb/ June– Oct/ 82-6234 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C3 (Continued) 8289 C3-2 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State/CRPR) Primary Habitat Associations/ Life Form/ Blooming Period/ Elevation Range (feet) Potential to Occur Atriplex serenana var. davidsonii Davidson’s saltscale None/None/1B.2 Coastal bluff scrub, coastal scrub; alkaline/ annual herb/ Apr–Oct/ 33- 656 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Calochortus catalinae Catalina mariposa lily None/None/4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland/ perennial bulbiferous herb/ (Feb) Mar–June/ 49-2297 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Calochortus plummerae Plummer’s mariposa lily None/None/4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, valley and foothill grassland; granitic, rocky/ perennial bulbiferous herb/ May–July/ 328-5577 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Calochortus weedii var. intermedius intermediate mariposa lily None/None/1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland; rocky, calcareous/ perennial bulbiferous herb/ May–July/ 344-2805 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Calystegia felix lucky morning- glory None/None/3.1 Meadows and seeps (sometimes alkaline), riparian scrub (alluvial); historically associated with wetland and marshy places, but possibly in drier situations as well; possibly silty loam and alkaline/ annual rhizomatous herb/ Mar–Sep/ 98-705 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Camissoniopsis lewisii Lewis’ evening- primrose None/None/3 Coastal bluff scrub, cismontane woodland, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland; sandy or clay/ annual herb/ Mar– May (June)/ 0-984 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Centromadia parryi ssp. australis southern tarplant None/None/1B.1 Marshes and swamps (margins), valley and foothill grassland (vernally mesic), vernal pools/ annual herb/ May–Nov/ 0-1575 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Chloropyron maritimum ssp. maritimum salt marsh bird’s-beak FE/CE/1B.2 Coastal dunes, marshes and swamps (coastal salt)/ annual herb (hemiparasitic)/ May–Oct/ 0-98 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C3 (Continued) 8289 C3-3 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State/CRPR) Primary Habitat Associations/ Life Form/ Blooming Period/ Elevation Range (feet) Potential to Occur Chorizanthe parryi var. fernandina San Fernando Valley spineflower FC/CE/1B.1 Coastal scrub (sandy), valley and foothill grassland/ annual herb/ Apr–July/ 492-4003 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Convolvulus simulans small-flowered morning-glory None/None/4.2 Chaparral (openings), coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland; clay, serpentinite seeps/ annual herb/ Mar–July/ 98-2297 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Deinandra paniculata paniculate tarplant None/None/4.2 Coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools; usually vernally mesic, sometimes sandy/ annual herb/ Apr–Nov/ 82-3084 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Dudleya multicaulis many-stemmed dudleya None/None/1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland; often clay/ perennial herb/ Apr–July/ 49-2592 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Dudleya stolonifera Laguna Beach dudleya FT/CT/1B.1 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland; rocky/ perennial stoloniferous herb/ May–July/ 33-853 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Eriastrum densifolium ssp. sanctorum Santa Ana River woollystar FE/CE/1B.1 Chaparral, coastal scrub (alluvial fan); sandy or gravelly/ perennial herb/ Apr–Sep/ 299-2001 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Eryngium aristulatum var. parishii San Diego button-celery FE/CE/1B.1 Coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland, vernal pools; mesic/ annual / perennial herb/ Apr–June/ 66-2034 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Helianthus nuttallii ssp. parishii Los Angeles sunflower None/None/1A Marshes and swamps (coastal salt and freshwater)/ perennial rhizomatous herb/ Aug–Oct/ 33-5495 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Hordeum intercedens vernal barley None/None/3.2 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland (saline flats and depressions), vernal pools/ annual herb/ Mar–June/ 16-3281 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C3 (Continued) 8289 C3-4 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State/CRPR) Primary Habitat Associations/ Life Form/ Blooming Period/ Elevation Range (feet) Potential to Occur Isocoma menziesii var. decumbens decumbent goldenbush None/None/1B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub (sandy, often in disturbed areas)/ perennial shrub/ Apr–Nov/ 33-443 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Juglans californica Southern California black walnut None/None/4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub; alluvial/ perennial deciduous tree/ Mar–Aug/ 164-2953 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Juncus acutus ssp. leopoldii southwestern spiny rush None/None/4.2 Coastal dunes (mesic), meadows and seeps (alkaline seeps), marshes and swamps (coastal salt)/ perennial rhizomatous herb/ (Mar) May–June/ 10-2953 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Lasthenia glabrata ssp. coulteri Coulter’s goldfields None/None/1B.1 Marshes and swamps (coastal salt), playas, vernal pools/ annual herb/ Feb–June/ 3-4003 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Lepidium virginicum var. robinsonii Robinson’s pepper-grass None/None/4.3 Chaparral, coastal scrub/ annual herb/ Jan–July/ 3-2904 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Nama stenocarpa mud nama None/None/2B.2 Marshes and swamps (lake margins, riverbanks)/ annual / perennial herb/ Jan–July/ 16-1640 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Nasturtium gambelii Gambel’s water cress FE/CT/1B.1 Marshes and swamps (freshwater or brackish)/ perennial rhizomatous herb/ Apr–Oct/ 16-1083 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Navarretia prostrata prostrate vernal pool navarretia None/None/1B.1 Coastal scrub, meadows and seeps, valley and foothill grassland (alkaline), vernal pools; mesic/ annual herb/ Apr–July/ 10-3970 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Nemacaulis denudata var. denudata coast woolly- heads None/None/1B.2 Coastal dunes/ annual herb/ Apr–Sep/ 0-328 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Orcuttia californica California Orcutt grass FE/CE/1B.1 Vernal pools/ annual herb/ Apr–Aug/ 49-2165 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C3 (Continued) 8289 C3-5 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State/CRPR) Primary Habitat Associations/ Life Form/ Blooming Period/ Elevation Range (feet) Potential to Occur Pentachaeta aurea ssp. allenii Allen’s pentachaeta None/None/1B.1 Coastal scrub (openings), valley and foothill grassland/ annual herb/ Mar–June/ 246-1706 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Phacelia hubbyi Hubby’s phacelia None/None/4.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, valley and foothill grassland; gravelly, rocky, talus/ annual herb/ Apr–July/ 0-3281 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Phacelia ramosissima var. austrolitoralis south coast branching phacelia None/None/3.2 Chaparral, coastal dunes, coastal scrub, marshes and swamps (coastal salt); sandy, sometimes rocky/ perennial herb/ Mar–Aug/ 16- 984 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Phacelia stellaris Brand’s star phacelia FC/None/1B.1 Coastal dunes, coastal scrub/ annual herb/ Mar–June/ 3-1312 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Quercus engelmannii Engelmann oak None/None/4.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, riparian woodland, valley and foothill grassland/ perennial deciduous tree/ Mar–June/ 164-4265 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Ribes divaricatum var. parishii Parish’s gooseberry None/None/1A Riparian woodland/ perennial deciduous shrub/ Feb–Apr/ 213-984 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Romneya coulteri Coulter’s matilija poppy None/None/4.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub; often in burns/ perennial rhizomatous herb/ Mar–July/ 66-3937 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Sagittaria sanfordii Sanford’s arrowhead None/None/1B.2 Marshes and swamps (assorted shallow freshwater)/ perennial rhizomatous herb/ May–Oct (Nov)/ 0-2133 Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Senecio aphanactis chaparral ragwort None/None/2B.2 Chaparral, cismontane woodland, coastal scrub; sometimes alkaline/ annual herb/ Jan–Apr/ 49-2625 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C3 (Continued) 8289 C3-6 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State/CRPR) Primary Habitat Associations/ Life Form/ Blooming Period/ Elevation Range (feet) Potential to Occur Sidalcea neomexicana salt spring checkerbloom None/None/2B.2 Chaparral, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, Mojavean desert scrub, playas; alkaline, mesic/ perennial herb/ Mar–June/ 49- 5020 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Suaeda esteroa estuary seablite None/None/1B.2 Marshes and swamps (coastal salt)/ perennial herb/ May–Oct (Jan)/ 0-16 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. Symphyotrichum defoliatum San Bernardino aster None/None/1B.2 Cismontane woodland, coastal scrub, lower montane coniferous forest, meadows and seeps, marshes and swamps, valley and foothill grassland (vernally mesic); near ditches, streams, springs/ perennial rhizomatous herb/ July–Nov/ 7-6693 Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known elevation range and there is no suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C4 Special-Status Wildlife Potentially Occurring within the Study Area 8289 C4-1 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State) Habitat Potential to Occur Amphibians Spea hammondii western spadefoot None/SSC Primarily grassland and vernal pools, but also in ephemeral wetlands that persist at least 3 weeks in chaparral, coastal scrrub, valley–foothill woodlands, pastures, and other agriculture Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Reptiles Actinemys marmorata western pond turtle None/SSC Slow-moving permanent or intermittent streams, ponds, small lakes, and reservoirs with emergent basking sites; adjacent uplands used for nesting and during winter Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known geographic range and there is no suitable habitat present. Aspidoscelis hyperythra orangethroat whiptail None/SSC Low-elevation coastal scrub, chaparral, and valley–foothill hardwood Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Aspidoscelis tigris stejnegeri San Diegan tiger whiptail None/None Open areas in semiarid grasslands, scrublands, and woodlands Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Chelonia mydas green turtle FT/None Shallow waters of lagoons, bays, estuaries, mangroves, eelgrass, and seaweed beds Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Crotalus ruber red diamondback rattlesnake None/SSC Coastal scrub, chaparral, oak and pine woodlands, rocky grasslands, cultivated areas, and desert flats Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Lichanura trivirgata rosy boa None/None Desert and chaparral habitats with rocky soils in coastal canyons and hillsides, desert canyons, washes, and mountains Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known geographic range and there is no suitable habitat present. Phrynosoma blainvillii Blainville’s horned lizard None/SSC Open areas of sandy soil in valleys, foothills, and semi-arid mountains including coastal scrub, chaparral, valley–foothill hardwood, conifer, riparian, pine–cypress, juniper, and annual grassland habitats Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Salvadora hexalepis virgultea coast patch- nosed snake None/SSC Brushy or shrubby vegetation; requires small mammal burrows for refuge and overwintering sites Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C4 (Continued) 8289 C4-2 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State) Habitat Potential to Occur Birds Accipiter cooperii (nesting) Cooper’s hawk None/WL Nests and forages in dense stands of live oak, riparian woodlands, or other woodland habitats often near water Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Agelaius tricolor (nesting colony) tricolored blackbird BCC/SSC Nests near freshwater, emergent wetland with cattails or tules, but also in Himalayan blackberrry; forages in grasslands, woodland, and agriculture Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Aimophila ruficeps canescens southern California rufous- crowned sparrow None/WL Nests and forages in open coastal scrub and chaparral with low cover of scattered scrub interspersed with rocky and grassy patches Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Ammodramus savannarum (nesting) grasshopper sparrow None/SSC Nests and forages in moderately open grassland with tall forbs or scattered shrubs used for perches Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Ardea herodias (nesting colony) great blue heron None/None Nests in large trees or snags; forages in wetlands, water bodies, watercourses, and opportunistically in uplands, including pasture and croplands Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Asio otus (nesting) long-eared owl None/SSC Nests in riparian habitat, live oak thickets, other dense stands of trees, edges of coniferous forest; forages in nearby open habitats Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Athene cunicularia (burrow sites and some wintering sites) burrowing owl BCC/SSC Nests and forages in grassland, open scrub, and agriculture, particularly with ground squirrel burrows Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Buteo regalis (wintering) ferruginous hawk BCC/WL Winters and forages in open, dry country, grasslands, open fields, agriculture Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Buteo swainsoni (nesting) Swainson’s hawk BCC/ST Nests in open woodland and savanna, riparian, and in isolated large trees; forages in nearby grasslands and agriculturals areas such as wheat and alfalfa fields and pasture Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Campylorhynchus brunneicapillus sandiegensis (San Diego and Orange Counties only) coastal cactus wren BCC/SSC Southern cactus scrub patches Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Charadrius alexandrinus nivosus (nesting) western snowy plover FT, BCC/SSC On coasts nests on sandy marine and estuarine shores; in the interior nests on sandy, barren or sparsely vegetated flats near saline or alkaline lakes, reservoirs, and ponds Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Coccyzus americanus occidentalis (nesting) western yellow- billed cuckoo FT, BCC/SE Nests in dense, wide riparian woodlands and forest with well-developed understories Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C4 (Continued) 8289 C4-3 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State) Habitat Potential to Occur Elanus leucurus (nesting) white-tailed kite None/FP Nests in woodland, riparian, and individual trees near open lands; forages opportunistically in grassland, meadows, scrubs, agriculture, emergent wetland, savanna, and disturbed lands Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Eremophila alpestris actia California horned lark None/WL Nests and forages in grasslands, disturbed lands, agriculture, and beaches; nests in alpine fell fields of the Sierra Nevada Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Icteria virens (nesting) yellow-breasted chat None/SSC Nests and forages in dense, relatively wide riparian woodlands and thickets of willows, vine tangles, and dense brush Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Laterallus jamaicensis coturniculus California black rail BCC/ST, FP Tidal marshes, shallow freshwater margins, wet meadows, and flooded grassy vegetation; suitable habitats are often supplied by canal leakage in Sierra Nevada foothill populations Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Pandion haliaetus (nesting) osprey None/WL Large waters (lakes, reservoirs, rivers) supporting fish; usually near forest habitats, but widely observed along the coast Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Passerculus sandwichensis beldingi Belding’s savannah sparrow None/SE Nests and forages in coastal saltmarsh dominated by pickleweed (Salicornia spp.) Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Polioptila californica californica coastal California gnatcatcher FT/SSC Nests and forages in various sage scrub communities, often dominated by California sagebrush and buckwheat; generally avoids nesting in areas with a slope of greater than 40%; majority of nesting at less than 1,000 feet above mean sea level Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Rallus obsoletus levipes Ridgway’s rail FE/SE, FP Coastal wetlands, brackish areas, coastal saline emergent wetlands Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Riparia riparia (nesting) bank swallow None/ST Nests in riparian, lacustrian, and coastal areas with vertical banks, bluffs, and cliffs with sandy soils; open country and water during migration Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Rynchops niger (nesting colony) black skimmer BCC/SSC Nests on barrier beaches, shell banks, spoil islands, and saltmarsh; forages over open water; roosts on sandy beaches and gravel bars Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Sternula antillarum browni (nesting colony) California least tern FE/SE, FP Forages in shallow estuaries and lagoons; nests on sandy beaches or exposed tidal flats Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Vireo bellii pusillus (nesting) least Bell’s vireo FE/SE Nests and forages in low, dense riparian thickets along water or along dry parts of intermittent streams; forages in riparian and adjacent shrubland late in nesting season Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C4 (Continued) 8289 C4-4 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State) Habitat Potential to Occur Fishes Catostomus santaanae Santa Ana sucker FT/SSC Small, shallow, cool, clear streams less than 7 meters (23 feet) in width and a few centimeters to more than a meter (1.5 inches to more than 3 feet) in depth; substrates are generally coarse gravel, rubble, and boulder Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known geographic range and there is no suitable habitat present. Mammals Choeronycteris mexicana Mexican long- tongued bat None/SSC Desert and montane riparian, desert succulent scrub, desert scrub, and pinyon–juniper woodland; roosts in caves, mines, and buildings Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Eumops perotis californicus western mastiff bat None/SSC Chaparral, coastal and desert scrub, coniferous and deciduous forest and woodland; roosts in crevices in rocky canyons and cliffs where the canyon or cliff is vertical or nearly vertical, trees, and tunnels Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Lasionycteris noctivagans silver-haired bat None/None Old-growth forest, maternity roosts in trees (primarily woodpecker hollows), large-diameter snags 50 feet aboveground; hibernates in hollow trees, under sloughing bark, in rock crevices, and occasionally in buildings, mines, and caves; forages in or near coniferous or mixed deciduous forest, often following stream or river drainages Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Lasiurus cinereus hoary bat None/None Forest, woodland riparian, and wetland habitats; also juniper scrub, riparian forest, and desert scrub in arid areas; roosts in tree foliage and sometimes cavities, such as woodpecker holes Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Lasiurus xanthinus western yellow bat None/SSC Valley–foothill riparian, desert riparian, desert wash, and palm oasis habitats; below 2,000 feet above mean sea level; roosts in riparian and palms Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Microtus californicus stephensi south coast marsh vole None/SSC Tidal marshes Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known geographic range and there is no suitable habitat present. Myotis yumanensis Yuma myotis None/None Riparian, arid scrublands and deserts, and forests associated with water (streams, rivers, tinajas); roosts in bridges, buildings, cliff crevices, caves, mines, and trees Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Nyctinomops femorosaccus pocketed free- tailed bat None/SSC Pinyon–juniper woodlands, desert scrub, desert succulent shrub, desert riparian, desert wash, alkali desert scrub, Joshua tree, and palm oases; roosts in high cliffs or rock outcrops with dropoffs, caverns, and buildings Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C4 (Continued) 8289 C4-5 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State) Habitat Potential to Occur Nyctinomops macrotis big free-tailed bat None/SSC Rocky areas; roosts in caves, holes in trees, buildings, and crevices on cliffs and rocky outcrops; forages over water Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Perognathus longimembris pacificus Pacific pocket mouse FE/SSC Fine-grained sandy substrates in open coastal strand, coastal dunes, and river alluvium Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Sorex ornatus salicornicus southern California saltmarsh shrew None/SSC Saltmarsh, salt grass, dense willow, bulrush Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known geographic range and there is no suitable habitat present. Taxidea taxus American badger None/SSC Dry, open, treeless areas; grasslands, coastal scrub, agriculture, and pastures, especially with friable soils Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Invertebrates Branchinecta sandiegonensis San Diego fairy shrimp FE/None Vernal pools, non-vegetated ephemeral pools Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Cicindela gabbii western tidal-flat tiger beetle None/None Inhabits estuaries and mudflats along the coast of Southern California Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Cicindela hirticollis gravida sandy beach tiger beetle None/None Inhabits areas adjacent to non-brackish water along the coast of California from San Francisco Bay to northern Mexico Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Cicindela latesignata latesignata western beach tiger beetle None/None Mudflats and beaches in coastal Southern California Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Cicindela senilis frosti senile tiger beetle None/None Inhabits marine shoreline, from Central California coast south to saltmarshes of San Diego; also found at Lake Elsinore Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Coelus globosus globose dune beetle None/None Inhabitant of coastal sand dune habitat; erratically distributed from Ten Mile Creek in Mendocino County south to Ensenada, Mexico Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Danaus plexippus monarch None/None Wind-protected tree groves with nectar sources and nearby water sources Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. Panoquina errans wandering skipper None/None Saltmarsh Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. APPENDIX C4 (Continued) 8289 C4-6 May 2016 Scientific Name Common Name Status (Federal/State) Habitat Potential to Occur Trigonoscuta dorothea dorothea Dorothy’s El Segundo Dune weevil None/None Coastal sand dunes in Los Angeles County. Not expected to occur. The site is outside of the species’ known geographic range and there is no suitable habitat present. Tryonia imitator mimic tryonia (=California brackishwater snail) None/None Inhabits coastal lagoons, estuaries, and saltmarshes, from Sonoma County south to San Diego County Not expected to occur. No suitable habitat present. APPENDIX D Cultural Resources Memorandum CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES MEMORANDUM To: Christine Saunders, Associate Planner City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division From: Adriane Dorrler, Dudek; Sarah Siren, Dudek Subject: Jefferson Stadium Park Project Cultural and Paleontological Resources Date: March 11, 2016 (revised March 24, 2016) cc: Collin Ramsey, Dudek; Micah Hale, Dudek Attachment 1: (Confidential) SCCIC Records Search Attachment 2 NAHC SLF Search Attachment 3 LACM Records Search Dudek is pleased to submit the results of a cultural and paleontological resources investigation to assist the City of Anaheim (City) with environmental compliance requirements for the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park project (proposed project) located in the City of Anaheim, California in Orange County. The proposed project would involve construction and operation of a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; a 1.11-acre public park; on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated on-site and frontage infrastructure improvements. As the overall development footprint for the proposed project falls within the study area already analyzed for the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project in the previously certified SEIR No. 339, the environmental and historical context of the project area will not be discussed in this memorandum. The contents and organization of this memorandum are as follows: (1) abridged project description; (2) regulatory framework, (3) research and field methodology, and (4) findings and recommendations. The South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) records search is included in this memorandum as Attachment 1 (Confidential). The results of the Native American Heritage Commission (NAHC) Sacred Lands File (SLF) are included in Attachment 2. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located in the southern portion of the City of Anaheim, which is in central Orange County (Figure 1). Regionally, the project site is located south of the City of Fullerton; west of the City of Orange; northeast of the City of Garden Grove; and southeast of the City of Buena Park. Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 2 March 2016 The approximately 17.57-acre, rectangular-shaped project site consists of a single parcel (Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-290-88). The street address associated with the project site is 1800 East Gene Autry Way. The project site is bound by East Gene Autry Way to the north, South State College Boulevard to the east; Artisan Court, the Anavia apartment community, and various commercial/office uses to the south; and a mix of commercial/industrial uses to the west. The project site is situated in Section 26, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, within the Anaheim U.S. Geological Survey (USGS) 7.5-minute quadrangle (Figure 2). PROJECT DESCRIPTION The proposed project consists of a three-phase (Phases I, II, and III), master-planned, mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; a 1.11-acre public park; on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated on-site and frontage infrastructure improvements. Phase I (also referred to herein as Building 1, the westernmost building) of the proposed project would consist of a 370-unit, five-story wrap apartment building. Phase II (also referred to herein as Building 2, the middle building) would consist of a mixed-use, five-story wrap community with 376 units, including 12 live/work units. Phase III (also referred to herein as Building 3, the easternmost building) would consist of a mixed-use, four-story podium building with 333 units and 9,800 square feet of retail. Dwelling units would range between approximately 584-square- foot studio apartments to 1,348-square-foot, two-bedroom apartments. REGULATORY SETTING State The California Register of Historical Resources In California, the term "historical resource" includes but is not limited to “any object, building, structure, site, area, place, record, or manuscript which is historically or archaeologically significant, or is significant in the architectural, engineering, scientific, economic, agricultural, educational, social, political, military, or cultural annals of California” (PRC section 5020.1(j)). In 1992, the California legislature established the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) “to be used by state and local agencies, private groups, and citizens to identify the state's historical resources and to indicate what properties are to be protected, to the extent prudent and feasible, from substantial adverse change” (PRC Section 5024.1(a)). The criteria for listing resources on the CRHR were expressly developed to be in accordance with previously established criteria developed for listing in the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), enumerated below. According to PRC Section 5024.1(c)(1–4), a resource is considered Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 3 March 2016 historically significant if it (i) retains “substantial integrity” and (ii) meets at least one of the following criteria: 1) Is associated with events that have made a significant contribution to the broad patterns of California's history and cultural heritage. 2) Is associated with the lives of persons important in our past. 3) Embodies the distinctive characteristics of a type, period, region, or method of construction, or represents the work of an important creative individual, or possesses high artistic values. 4) Has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. In order to understand the historic importance of a resource, sufficient time must have passed to obtain a scholarly perspective on the events or individuals associated with the resource. A resource less than 50 years old may be considered for listing in the CRHR if it can be demonstrated that sufficient time has passed to understand its historical importance (CCR 14 Section 4852(d)(2)). The CRHR protects cultural resources by requiring evaluations of the significance of prehistoric and historic resources. The criteria for the CRHR are nearly identical to those for the NRHP, and properties listed or formally designated as eligible for listing in the NRHP are automatically listed in the CRHR, as are the state landmarks and points of interest. The CRHR also includes properties designated under local ordinances or identified through local historical resource surveys. California Environmental Quality Act As described further below, the following California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) statutes and CEQA Guidelines are of relevance to the analysis of archaeological, historic, and tribal cultural resources:  PRC Section 21083.2(g) defines “unique archaeological resource.”  PRC Section 21084.1 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a) defines “historical resources.” In addition, CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b) defines the phrase “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource”; it also defines the circumstances when a project would materially impair the significance of an historical resource.  PRC Section 21074(a) defines “tribal cultural resources.” Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 4 March 2016  PRC Section 5097.98 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(e): Set forth standards and steps to be employed following the accidental discovery of human remains in any location other than a dedicated ceremony.  PRC Sections 21083.2(b)-(c) and CEQA Guidelines Section 15126.4: Provide information regarding the mitigation framework for archaeological and historic resources, including examples of preservation-in-place mitigation measures; preservation-in-place is the preferred manner of mitigating impacts to significant archaeological sites because it maintains the relationship between artifacts and the archaeological context, and may also help avoid conflict with religious or cultural values of groups associated with the archaeological site(s). More specifically, under CEQA, a project may have a significant effect on the environment if it may cause “a substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)). If a site is either listed or eligible for listing in the CRHR, or if it is included in a local register of historic resources, or identified as significant in a historical resources survey (meeting the requirements of PRC section 5024.1(q)), it is a “historical resource” and is presumed to be historically or culturally significant for purposes of CEQA (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). The lead agency is not precluded from determining that a resource is a historical resource even if it does not fall within this presumption (PRC Section 21084.1; CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(a)). A “substantial adverse change in the significance of an historical resource” reflecting a significant effect under CEQA means “physical demolition, destruction, relocation, or alteration of the resource or its immediate surroundings such that the significance of an historical resource would be materially impaired” (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(b)(1); PRC Section 5020.1(q)). In turn, the significance of an historical resource is materially impaired when a project: 1) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of an historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its inclusion in, or eligibility for, inclusion in the California Register; or 2) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics that account for its inclusion in a local register of historical resources pursuant to PRC Section 5020.1(k) or its identification in an historical resources survey meeting the requirements of PRC Section 5024.1(g), unless the public agency reviewing the effects of the project establishes by a preponderance of evidence that the resource is not historically or culturally significant; or Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 5 March 2016 3) Demolishes or materially alters in an adverse manner those physical characteristics of a historical resource that convey its historical significance and that justify its eligibility for inclusion in the California Register as determined by a lead agency for purposes of CEQA. (CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(b)(2).) Pursuant to these sections, the CEQA inquiry begins with evaluating whether a project site contains any “historical resources,” then evaluates whether that project will cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource such that the resource’s historical significance is materially impaired. If it can be demonstrated that a project will cause damage to a unique archaeological resource, the lead agency may require reasonable efforts be made to permit any or all of these resources to be preserved in place or left in an undisturbed state. To the extent that they cannot be left undisturbed, mitigation measures are required (PRC Section 21083.2[a], [b], and [c]). PRC Section 21083.2(g) defines a unique archaeological resource as an archaeological artifact, object, or site about which it can be clearly demonstrated that without merely adding to the current body of knowledge, there is a high probability that it meets any of the following criteria: 1) Contains information needed to answer important scientific research questions and that there is a demonstrable public interest in that information. 2) Has a special and particular quality such as being the oldest of its type or the best available example of its type. 3) Is directly associated with a scientifically recognized important prehistoric or historic event or person. Impacts to non-unique archaeological resources are generally not considered a significant environmental impact (PRC Section 21083.2(a); CEQA Guidelines section 15064.5(c)(4).) However, if a non-unique archaeological resource qualifies as tribal cultural resource (PRC Section 21074(c); 21083.2(h)), further consideration of significant impacts is required. CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5 assigns special importance to human remains and specifies procedures to be used when Native American remains are discovered. As described below, these procedures are detailed in PRC Section 5097.98. Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 6 March 2016 Paleontological Resources Paleontological resources are limited, nonrenewable resources of scientific, cultural, and educational value and are afforded protection under state (CEQA) laws and regulations. This study satisfies project requirements in accordance with CEQA (13 PRC, 2100 et seq.) and PRC Section 5097.5 (Stats 1965, c 1136, p. 2792). This analysis also complies with guidelines and significance criteria specified by the Society of Vertebrate Paleontology (2010). Public Resources Code Section 5097.5 California’s Public Resources Code (PRC) Section 5097.5 states that: No person shall knowingly and willfully excavate upon, or remove, destroy, injure, or deface, any historic or prehistoric ruins, burial grounds, archaeological or vertebrate paleontological site, including fossilized footprints, inscriptions made by human agency, rock art, or any other archaeological, paleontological or historical feature, situated on [lands owned by, or under the jurisdiction of, the state, or any city, county, district, authority, or public corporation, or any agency thereof], except with the express permission of the public agency having the jurisdiction over the lands. Violation of this section is a misdemeanor. California Code of Regulations Two sections of the California Code of Regulations (14 CCR Division 3, Chapter 1), applicable to lands administered by State Parks, address paleontological resources: Section 4307: Geological Features— No person shall destroy, disturb, mutilate, or remove earth, sand, gravel, oil, minerals, rocks, paleontological features, or features of caves. Section 4309: Special Permits— [California Department of Parks and Recreation] may grant a permit to remove, treat, disturb, or destroy plants or animals or geological, historical, archaeological or paleontological materials; and any person who has been properly granted such a permit shall to that extent not be liable for prosecution for violating the foregoing. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology Standards The Society of Vertebrate Paleontology has established standard guidelines that outline professional protocols and practices for conducting paleontological resource assessments. Under Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 7 March 2016 the “Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources,” rock units are described as having (a) high, (b) undetermined, (c) low, or (d) no potential for containing significant paleontological resources, as shown in Table 1. The determination of the paleontological resource potential of an area proposed for development is founded on a review of pertinent geological and paleontological literature, geological maps, and on records in fossil locality databases of paleontological specimens deposited in institutions (e.g., museums and universities). Table 1 Assessment of the Paleontological Potential of Rock Units (From Society of Vertebrate Paleontology) Resource Potential Definition High Potential Rock units from which vertebrate or significant invertebrate, plant, or trace fossils have been recovered are considered to have a high potential for containing additional significant paleontological resources. Rock units classified as having high potential for producing paleontological resources include, but are not limited to, sedimentary formations and some volcanoclastic formations (e.g., ashes or tephras), and some low-grade metamorphic rocks that contain significant paleontological resources anywhere within their geographical extent, and sedimentary rock units temporally or lithologically suitable for the preservation of fossils (e.g., middle Holocene and older, fine-grained fluvial sandstones, argillaceous and carbonate-rich paleosols, cross-bedded point bar sandstones, fine-grained marine sandstones, etc.). Paleontological potential consists of both (a) the potential for yielding abundant or significant vertebrate fossils or for yielding a few significant fossils, large or small, vertebrate, invertebrate, plant, or trace fossils and (b) the importance of recovered evidence for new and significant taxonomic, phylogenetic, paleoecologic, taphonomic, biochronologic, or stratigraphic data. Rock units that contain potentially datable organic remains older than late Holocene, including deposits associated with animal nests or middens, and rock units that may contain new vertebrate deposits, traces, or trackways are also classified as having high potential. Undetermined Potential Rock units for which little information is available concerning their paleontological content, geologic age, and depositional environment are considered to have undetermined potential. Further study is necessary to determine if these rock units have high or low potential to contain significant paleontological resources. A field survey by a qualified professional paleontologist to specifically determine the paleontological resource potential of these rock units is required before a paleontological resource impact mitigation program can be developed. In cases where no subsurface data are available, paleontological potential can sometimes be determined by strategically located excavations into subsurface stratigraphy. Low Potential Reports in the paleontological literature or field surveys by a qualified professional paleontologist may allow determination that some rock units have low potential for yielding significant fossils. Such rock units will be poorly represented by fossil specimens in institutional collections, or based on general scientific consensus only preserve fossils in rare circumstances and the presence of fossils is the exception not the rule, e. g., basalt flows or recent colluvium. Rock units with low potential typically will not require impact mitigation measures to protect fossils. No Potential Some rock units have no potential to contain significant paleontological resources, for instance high- grade metamorphic rocks (such as gneisses and schists) and plutonic igneous rocks (such as granites and diorites). Rock units with no potential require no protection nor impact mitigation measures relative to paleontological resources. Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 8 March 2016 METHODS Cultural Resources Records Search Methods Dudek conducted a California Historical Resources Information System (CHRIS) records search at the SCCIC on February 29, 2016 for the proposed project and surrounding half-mile radius. This search included their collection of mapped prehistoric, historical, and built-environment resources; Department of Parks and Recreation Site Records; technical reports; archival resources; and ethnographic references. Additional consulted sources included the NRHP, California Inventory of Historical Resources/CRHR and listed Office of Historic Preservation Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility, California Points of Historical Interest, California Historical Landmarks, and California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) Bridge Survey information. Attachment 1 (Confidential) provides the confidential results of the records search and a bibliography of prior cultural resources studies. Dudek also consulted historic maps and aerial photographs to further understand the development of the project site and surrounding area (NETR 2016). Native American Coordination As part of the process of identifying cultural resources within or near the project site, Dudek contacted the NAHC to request a review of the SLF on February 22, 2016. The NAHC emailed a response on March 3, 2016 (Attachment 2), and stated that the SLF search was negative for the presence of Native American cultural resources within the immediate project site. Because the SLF search does not include an exhaustive list of Native American cultural resources, the NAHC suggested contacting Native American individuals and/or tribal organizations who may have direct knowledge of cultural resources in or near the project site. The NAHC provided the contact list along with the SLF search results. Upon written notice to proceed, Dudek will send letters to each of the persons and entities on the contact list, requesting information about cultural sites and resources in or near the project site. To date, no tribal outreach has been performed. Field Survey Methods Although the project site currently consists of vacant flat land, nine buildings (constructed in the late twentieth century) previously occupied the site. As a result, the project site has been highly disturbed by development of the parcel and the construction and subsequent demolition of the on-site buildings. Because of the disturbed and developed condition of the site, Dudek Archaeologist Adriane Dorrler conducted a reconnaissance-level survey of the project site. Ms. Dorrler conducted the survey on February 29, 2016, using standard Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 9 March 2016 archaeological procedures and techniques for a reconnaissance survey. Ms. Dorrler focused the survey efforts on examining all available areas of exposed ground (i.e., undeveloped areas or areas devoid of asphalt and concrete) for prehistoric artifacts (e.g., flaked stone tools, tool- making debris, stone milling tools, ceramics, fire-affected rock), soil discoloration that might indicate the presence of a cultural midden, soil depressions, features indicative of the current or former presence of historic-era structures or buildings (e.g., standing exterior walls, post holes, foundations), and historic artifacts (e.g., metal, glass, ceramics, building materials). Ms. Dorrler took detailed notes and photographs of the project site and surrounding area. All fieldwork was documented using field notes, digital photography, iPad technology with close- scale field maps, and aerial photographs. Location-specific photographs were taken using an Apple 3rd Generation IPAD equipped with 8 MP resolution and georeferenced PDF maps of the project site. Accuracy of this device ranged between 3 meters and 10 meters. All field notes, photographs, and records related to the pedestrian survey are on file at Dudek’s Riverside, California office. Paleontological Resources Records Search Methods A records search of paleontological locality information was requested through the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County on February 22, 2016 (Attachment 3). The purpose of museum collections records searches is to determine whether there are any known fossil localities in or near the project area, to identify the geologic units present within the project area, and to obtain the museum’s opinion about whether mitigation measures are warranted to avoid or minimize potential adverse effects of project construction on paleontological resources. Geologic maps (CGS 2012 and USGS 2006)) and reports were also queried to identify geologic units on the site and determine the paleontological sensitivity of the site. RESULTS This section presents the results of the records searches, archival research, and field survey for the current study. Cultural and paleontological resources are discussed separately. Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 10 March 2016 Cultural Resources Records Search Results Previously Conducted Cultural Resources Studies SCCIC records indicate that 12 cultural resource investigations have been conducted within the half-mile search radius of the proposed project (Table 2). None of these studies overlap the project site, indicating that the project site has never been subject to a cultural resources study. Three reports (OR-2256 and OR-3330/3352) studied areas adjacent to the project site to the east and south. OR-2256 consists of an extensive linear survey conducted in 1999 along State College Boulevard. Although cultural resources were identified as a result of the study, none of the resources identified are within the half-mile search radius for the proposed project. OR- 3330/3352 consists of the survey and subsequent monitoring of two parcels adjacent to the southeast corner of the project site along State College Boulevard. No cultural resources were identified as a result of the survey or monitoring effort. Table 2 Previous Cultural Resource Studies Identified within the Half-Mile Search Radius Report No. Year Title Author OR-0894 1988 Archaeological Survey of the Orange Drive-In Theater Property McKenna, J. and R. Hatheway OR-1898 1990 Finding of Effect Widening of Interstate 5 and Reconstruction of Interchanges Between State Routes 22/57 and 91 in the Cities of Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Fullerton and Buena Park Caltrans OR-2200 2000 Cultural Resources Investigation for the Nextlink Fiber Optic Project, Los Angeles and Orange Counties, California Atchley, S.M. OR-2256 1999 Cultural Resources Assessments for Orange County Sanitation Districts Demcak, C.R. OR-2355 2001 Cultural Resource Assessment: Cingular Wireless Facility No. Sm 077-01, Orange County, California Duke, C. OR-2754 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment AT&T Wireless Services Facility No. 13064a-01 Duke, C. OR-2898 2005 Results of Archaeological Resource Mitigation Monitoring for Anaheim Corners Mixed-Use Development Staley, M., T. Fulton, and D. McLean OR-3330 2006 Phase I Archaeological Resource Survey of Ttm#16826, a ~5.16 Acre Site, Located at 2045 South State College Boulevard, City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California 92806 for the Gateway Center Project APNs# 232-081-16 and 232-081-21 Schneeberger, S.L. and C.E. Drover OR-3352 2007 Results of the Cultural Resources Monitoring Program for the Platinum Triangle Gateway Center Project APNs# 232-081-16 and 232-081-21 Schneeberger, S.L., C.E. Drover, M. Roeder, and C.L. Schulga Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 11 March 2016 Table 2 Previous Cultural Resource Studies Identified within the Half-Mile Search Radius Report No. Year Title Author OR-4017 2011 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for T- Mobile USA Candidate LA33523-A (Dupont Commercial), 2165 Dupont Drive, Anaheim, Orange County, California Bonner, W. OR-4113 2010 Cultural Resources Study of the Anaheim Stadium Project, AT&T Site No. OC0360, 2000 E. Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, Orange County, California 92806 Supernowicz, D. OR-4156 2009 Draft, Phase I Archaeological Resources Survey Report, Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center Project, City of Anaheim, Orange County, California Wood, C. Previously Recorded Cultural Resources There are no previously recorded cultural resources within the project site. No archaeological resources were identified within the half-mile search radius of the project site. However, four previously recorded built-environment resources are located within the half-mile search radius (Table 3). These resources include the Melrose Abbey Mausoleum (30-161815), the Anaheim Public Utility District Katella Substation (30-161816), the Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway (30-176663), and the Anaheim Stadium/Angel Stadium (30-177113). The Melrose Abbey Mausoleum and the Anaheim Public Utility District Katella Substation are both recommended eligible for inclusion in the NRHP. The two remaining resources, Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway and the Anaheim Stadium/Angel Stadium, were evaluated and found ineligible for the NRHP. All of the built-environment resources are identified in the Office of Historic Preservation Historic Resources Inventory except the Melrose Abbey Mausoleum. Table 3 Previously Recorded Cultural Resources within the Half-Mile Search Radius Primary Number Period Type Location NRHP/CRHP Status Description P-30-161815 Historic Building In half-mile records search area Recommended Eligible for NRHP Melrose Abbey Mausoleum P-30-161816 Historic Building In half-mile records search area Recommended Eligible for NRHP Anaheim Public Utility District Katella Substation P-30-176663 Historic Railroad In half-mile records search area Not Eligible Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway P-30-177113 Historic Stadium In half-mile records search area Not Eligible Anaheim Stadium/Angel Stadium Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 12 March 2016 Archival Research Historic topographic maps of the project site were available from the SCCIC for the following years: 1901, 1947, 1950, 1967, and 1981. Historic aerial photographs of the project site were available for the years 1953, 1963, 1972, 1980, 1995, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2009, 2010, and 2012 (NETR 2016). By 1901, the southern portion of the City of Anaheim was not as developed as the downtown area. The area surrounding the project site was undeveloped aside from a few scattered structures and roads and a network of railway junctions. The area received some infrastructure by 1947; and by 1950, the area was predominantly mapped as agricultural land. Within the 10 years between 1953 and 1963, the area around the project site began shifting from agricultural land to development. Although the project site remained vacant and possibly fallow, commercial developments began to appear to the north and south of the project site. By 1972, the construction of the Anaheim Stadium brought development to the entire east side of the surrounding area. Development continued to encroach to the north, west, and south of the project site. All the remaining agricultural land was fallow by this time, including the project site. By 1980, the project site was completely developed with nine commercial/industrial buildings. Commercial/industrial development surrounded the project site except to the south. By 1995, the project site and surrounding area was completely developed with commercial/industrial use. The only vacant lot in the surrounding area was a result of the demolition of the building to the south of the project site that was originally constructed sometime between 1953 and 1963. There was no apparent change to the project site and surrounding area between 1995 and 2005. But by 2009, eight of the nine on-site buildings were demolished, as was the commercial development to the north of the project site. The ninth building on the project site was demolished in 2012/2013. The project site has been completely vacant since 2012/2013. Field Results The pedestrian survey did not identify any cultural resources in the project site. Ground surface visibility was excellent (>75%) throughout the project site, as very little vegetation is present. The project site is relatively flat with the existing ground surface at an elevation of between approximately 143 and 146 feet above mean sea level. The project site currently consists of vacant land. No native soils were observed, and all exposed surface soil was composed of fill material. The project site is effectively entirely disturbed. Isolated stockpiles of crushed concrete, asphalt, and soils are present on the project site, likely the remnants of the previous buildings, parking lots, drive aisles, and associated improvements that once occurred on site. Aside from these stockpiles and remnant parking lots and drive aisles, land cover found on the project site is limited to ornamental trees found generally along the project frontages, and ruderal grassland vegetation within the footprints of the former buildings. Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 13 March 2016 Paleontological Resources Dudek conducted a review of published geological mapping and an institutional records search as part of this study. In general, the project site is located within sedimentary deposits of the Coastal Plain of Orange County, west of the Santa Ana Mountains. These deposits are composed of a thick sequence of marine and alluvial sedimentary deposits ranging in age from the Cretaceous to the present (CGS 2012, USGS 2006). The entire project site is underlain by Quaternary alluvium, according to regional mapping by USGS (2006). These Holocene, or Recent, alluvial deposits are comprised of loose silt, sand, and gravel. Older alluvial deposits that are Pleistocene in age (“Ice Age” deposits), presumably underlie the younger alluvial deposits at depth. Although no fossils are recorded from within the project site itself, construction nearby the project site has produced paleontological resources. According to the records search results received from the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County (LACM), northeast of the project and west of the Santa Ana River, a fossil specimen of sheep (Ovis) was recovered from LACM 1652 (Attachment 3). East of the Santa Ana River, LACM 4943 yielded a specimen of fossil horse (Equus), at approximately 8 to 10 feet below the ground surface (Attachment 3). FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Cultural Resources Dudek’s review of record search data and reconnaissance-level pedestrian survey did not identify any cultural resources in the project site. No pre-historic or historic archaeological resources were identified within the half-mile search radius. The four resources identified outside the project site but within the half-mile search radius are all historic-age built-environment resources. The project site was primarily used as agricultural land until the late twentieth century. Historic topographic maps and aerial photographs do not indicate the presence of any buildings, structures, or features on the property before then. Additionally, the project site was depicted as flat open field. There are no discernable topographic features on the project site that indicate a possible water source, bedrock outcrop, or any other natural element suggestive of possible pre- historic land use. The project site was completely developed by 1980 with large scale commercial/industrial buildings encompassing the site. The project site has stood vacant since the demolition of the buildings during the early 2010s. Although the buildings are no longer extant, much of the surface and in-ground infrastructure still remains. Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 14 March 2016 Based on the records search results, negative survey, and highly disturbed condition of the site, the site has a low potential for the inadvertent discovery of cultural resources during construction. Therefore, no additional management recommendations have been identified other than standard protection measures for unanticipated discoveries of cultural resources and human remains during construction activities. In the event that archaeological resources (sites, features, or artifacts) are exposed during construction activities for the proposed project, all construction work occurring within 100 feet of the find shall immediately stop until a qualified archaeologist, meeting the Secretary of the Interior’s Professional Qualification Standards, can evaluate the significance of the find and determine whether or not additional study is warranted. Depending upon the significance of the find under CEQA (14 CCR 15064.5(f); PRC Section 21082), the archaeologist may simply record the find and allow work to continue. If the discovery proves significant under CEQA, additional work such as preparation of an archaeological treatment plan, testing, or data recovery may be warranted. In accordance with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code, if human remains are found, the County Coroner shall be immediately notified of the discovery. No further excavation or disturbance of the site or any nearby area reasonably suspected to overlie adjacent remains shall occur until the County Coroner has determined, within 2 working days of notification of the discovery, the appropriate treatment and disposition of the human remains. If the County Coroner determines that the remains are, or are believed to be, Native American, he or she shall notify the NAHC in Sacramento within 24 hours. In accordance with California PRC, Section 5097.98, the NAHC must immediately notify those persons it believes to be the most likely descendent from the deceased Native American. The most likely descendent shall complete their inspection within 48 hours of being granted access to the site. The designated Native American representative would then determine, in consultation with the property owner, the disposition of the human remains. Paleontological Resources No paleontological resources were identified within the project site as a result of the institutional records search or desktop geological review. Furthermore, the project site is located within an area that has been previously developed and is likely underlain by fill materials. As such, the project site is not anticipated to be underlain by unique geologic features. No vertebrate fossil localities are recorded within the boundaries of the project site, although there are localities nearby from the same sedimentary units that occur as subsurface deposits in the broader project area. Memorandum Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Cultural and Paleontological Resources 9289.1 15 March 2016 Surficial sediments at the project site and in the surrounding area consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of the general floodplain of the Santa Ana River that flows just east of the project area. These younger Quaternary deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, although a vertebrate fossil locality north of the project site located along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. The closest vertebrate fossil locality to the project site in older Quaternary sediments is situated along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street east of the Santa Ana River, which produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8 to 10 feet below the surface. Grading or very shallow excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger Quaternary alluvial sediments in the project site are unlikely to uncover significant fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations at the project site that extend down into older deposits, however, may encounter vertebrate fossils. REFERENCES CGS (California Geological Survey). 2012. “Geologic Compilation of Quaternary Surficial Deposits in Southern California.” CGS Special Publication 217 (Revised). Compiled by T.L. Bedrossian, P.D. Roffers, C.A. Hayhurst, J.T. Lancaster, and W.R. Short. Digitally prepared by S. McCrea, B. Wanish, J. Thompson, A. Carney, M.A. Myers, and S. Utley. NETR (National Environmental Title Research, LLC). 2016. Address search for: 1800 Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, CA. Accessed March 4, 2016. http://www.historicaerials.com/. Society of Vertebrate Paleontology. 2010. “Standard Procedures for the Assessment and Mitigation of Adverse Impacts to Paleontological Resources.” Accessed March 2016. http://vertpaleo.org/Membership/Member-Ethics/SVP_Impact_Mitigation_ Guidelines.aspx. USGS (U.S. Geological Survey). 2006. “Geological map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana 30' x 60' quadrangles, California” [map]. 1:100,000. Open-File Report OF_2006-1217. http://pubs.usgs.gov/of/2006/1217/of2006-1217_map/of2006-1217_geol_map.pdf. Carlsbad Vista Camp PendletonSouthOceanside Bonsall CampPendletonNorth Fallbrook SanClemente DanaPoint San JuanCapistrano LagunaNiguel LagunaHills Coto DeCazaNewportBeachMissionViejo TrabucoHighlands ElToroCostaMesaIrvine HuntingtonBeach Tustin SantaAna SealBeach TustinFoothills GardenGrove LosAlamitos Orange AnaheimBuenaPark Placentia Yorba LindaFullerton Brea Perris Corona MarchAFBWoodcrest Norco MorenoValley PedleyMiraLoma Riverside Rubidoux GlenAvon Wildomar LakeElsinore RanchoPalosVerdes Palos Verdes Estates LakewoodTorranceCarsonLongBeach CerritosRedondoBeach BellflowerGardenaComptonEl SegundoHawthorne Norwalk SouthGate Downey Santa FeSprings VernonCulver City HaciendaHeights SantaMonica DiamondBar East LosAngeles Industry Walnut BeverlyHills CovinaAlhambra Pomona Claremont La VerneGlendora San FernandoValley SantaClarita WestCovina Irwindale Burbank DuarteMonroviaAltadena Pasadena La CanadaFlintridge Glendale Acton ChinoHills Chino LomaLindaBloomingtonMontclairColton Upland RanchoCucamonga Fontana Rialto SanBernardino Highland Crestline LakeArrowhead Hesperia FountainValley Westminster Cypress LaHabra ManhattanBeach La Mirada SouthWhittierInglewood La HabraHeights RowlandHeightsWhittier Commerce Pico Rivera Montebello MontereyPark Rosemead El Monte SanGabriel SanDimasBaldwinPark TempleCity SanMarino AzusaArcadia LosAngeles L o s A n g e l e s C o u n t y Orange County S a n B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y Los Angeles County San B e r n a r d i n o C o u n t y Orange County San Diego CountyP a c i f i c O c e a n 47 118 55 241 126 142 187 206170 78 134 213 76 133 173 71 57 22 73 83 18 14 91 39 19 66 1 138 60 74 2 101 395 710 215 5 105 110 10 405 210 15 5 FIGURE 1 Regional Map Jefferson Stadium Park Project Da t e : 3 / 1 0 / 2 0 1 6 - L a s t s a v e d b y : r s t r o b r i d g e - P a t h : Z : \ P r o j e c t s \ j 9 2 8 9 0 1 \ M A P D O C \ D O C U M E N T \ F i g u r e 2 - 1 _ R e g i o n a l M a p . m x d 0 105Miles Project Site ATTACHMENT 1 (Confidential) SCCIC Records Search ATTACHMENT 2 NAHC SLF Search SLF&Contactsform: rev: 05/07/14 Sacred Lands File & Native American Contacts List Request NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE COMMISSION 1550 Harbor Blvd, Suite 100 West Sacramento, CA 95501 (916) 373-3710 (916) 373-5471 – Fax nahc@nahc.ca.gov Information Below is Required for a Sacred Lands File Search Project: County: USGS Quadrangle Name: Township: Range: Section(s): Company/Firm/Agency: Contact Person: Street Address: City: Zip: Phone: Extension: Fax: Email: Project Description: Project Location Map is attached Anaheim 4S 10W 26 Dudek Adriane Dorrler 3544 University Avenue Riverside 92501 (760) 840-7556 (760) 632-0164 adorrler@dudek.com Dudek has been tasked with preparing a Phase I Cultural Resources Inventory for a proposed mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,000 square feet of retail space; a new 1.11-acre public park; on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated infrastructure improvements. The 18-acre project site is located on the southwest corner of E. Gene Autry Way and State College Blvd in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. ✔ Jefferson Stadium Park (9289) Orange ORANGEANAHEIM SOURCE: USGS 7.5-Minute Series Orange & Anaheim QuadranglesTownship 4S; Range 10W; Sections 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 34, 35, 36 Records Search Map Jefferson Stadium Park Project 0 2,0001,000 Feet 0 500 Meters Legend 1 Mile Buffer Study Area Figure ATTACHMENT 3 LACM Records Search Vertebrate Paleontology Section Telephone: (213) 763-3325 Fax: (213) 746-7431 e-mail: smcleod@nhm.org 7 March 2016 Dudek 605 Third Street Encinitas, CA 92024 Attn: Sarah Siren, Senior Paleontologist re: Vertebrate Paleontology Records Check for paleontological resources for the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Dudek Project # 9289, in the City of Anaheim, Orange County project area Dear Sarah: I have conducted a thorough search of our paleontology collection records for the locality and specimen data for the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park Project, Dudek Project # 9289, in the City of Anaheim, Orange County project area, as outlined on the portion of the Anaheim USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent to me via e-mail on 22 February 2016. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie within the project boundaries, but we do have localities nearby from the same sedimentary units that occur as subsurface deposits in the proposed project area. Surficial sediments at the proposed project site and in the surrounding area consist of younger terrestrial Quaternary Alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of the general floodplain of the Santa Ana River that flows just east of the proposed project area. These younger Quaternary deposits typically do not contain significant vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, but we have a vertebrate fossil locality, LACM 1652, along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue just north-northeast of the proposed project area, that produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. Our closest vertebrate fossil locality in older Quaternary sediments is LACM 4943, situated almost due east of locality LACM 1652 along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street east of the Santa Ana River, that produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8-10 feet below the surface. Grading or very shallow excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger Quaternary alluvial sediments in the proposed project site area are unlikely to uncover significant fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations at the proposed project site area that extend down into older deposits, however, may well encounter significant vertebrate fossils. Any substantial excavations below the uppermost layers, therefore, should be closely monitored to quickly and professionally collect any specimens without impeding development. Sediment samples should also be collected and processed to determine the small fossil potential in the proposed project area. Any fossils recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited and permanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations. This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of the proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential on-site survey. Sincerely, Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D. Vertebrate Paleontology enclosure: invoice APPENDIX E Geotechnical Exploration Report GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT VACANT PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD AND GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Prepared for JPI Real Estate Acquisition 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 San Diego, California 92130 Project No. 11091.001 January 8, 2016 January 8, 2015 Project No. 11091.001 JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 San Diego, California 92130 Attention: Ms. Rosie Cooper Subject: Geotechnical Exploration Report Proposed Residential Development Vacant Property at the Southwest Corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Leighton and Associates, Inc. (Leighton) is pleased to submit this geotechnical exploration report for a 17-acre vacant property located at the southwestern corner of Stage College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way in the City of Anaheim, California. This revised report incorporates the response to review comments by the City’s reviewer (Appendix F) and will supersede our previous report dated November 3, 2015. Based on a review of the conceptual site plan prepared by Architects Orange, dated November 3, 2015, the proposed project is to develop the site, known as Jefferson Stadium Park, to a 1,079-unit mixed-use community. The current plan depicts three apartment buildings (in three phases), each 5 to 6 stories in height. Parking accommodations for Phase I and Phase II will be provided by a detached 6 level above grade parking structure (one for each phase) while parking accommodations for Phase III (i.e., the building adjacent to State College Boulevard) will be provided by a 2 level above grade podium parking structure over a single 9 to 11 feet deep subterranean parking level. No other subterranean structures are planned for the project at this time. In addition, leasing offices, club house fitness, retail and flex spaces are also planned for the site. Other amenities planned include a 1.1-acre park, recreational areas, and courtyards. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 2 Results of our exploration suggested that the development of the project for its intended use is feasible. This report summarizes our findings and preliminary recommendations with respect to site grading, foundation design, and the associated development for the project. Leighton appreciates the opportunity of service to JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you question or need additional information. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Jeffrey M. Pflueger, PG, CEG 2499 Associate Geologist Ext. 4257, Jpflueger@leightongroup.com Vincent P. Ip, PE, GE 2522 Senior Principal Engineer Ext. 1682, vip@leightongroup.com JMP/VPI/lr Distribution: (1) Addressee Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Site and Project Description ....................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ..................................... 2 2.1 Field Exploration ........................................................................................ 2 2.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing ............................................................... 3 2.3 Percolation Testing Results ....................................................................... 3 3.0 GEOLOGIC AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................................ 5 3.1 Geologic Setting ........................................................................................ 5 3.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions ........................................................................ 5 3.2.1 Strength Characteristics .................................................................. 6 3.2.2 Compressibility Potential ................................................................. 6 3.2.3 Expansive Soils ............................................................................... 6 3.2.4 Corrosivity ....................................................................................... 7 3.3 Groundwater Conditions ............................................................................ 7 4.0 SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ............................................................... 8 4.1 Faulting ...................................................................................................... 8 4.2 Ground Motion Study ................................................................................. 8 4.3 Liquefaction Potential................................................................................. 8 4.4 Seismically-Induced Settlement ................................................................. 9 4.5 Seismically-Induced Landslides ................................................................. 9 4.6 Flooding ..................................................................................................... 9 4.7 Seiches and Tsunamis............................................................................... 9 5.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................... 10 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 10 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations ............................................................... 11 6.2 Site Grading ............................................................................................. 11 6.3 Foundation Design ................................................................................... 13 6.4 Slab-on-Grade ......................................................................................... 15 6.5 Concrete Flatwork .................................................................................... 16 6.6 Temporary Excavations ........................................................................... 17 6.7 Temporary Shoring .................................................................................. 17 6.8 Earth Retaining Structures ....................................................................... 20 6.9 Drilled Caissons Construction .................................................................. 21 6.10 Corrosion Protection Measures ............................................................... 22 Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 ii 6.11 Surface Drainage ..................................................................................... 22 6.12 Geotechnical Services During Construction ............................................. 22 7.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................... 23 Important Information About This Geotechnical Engineering Report List of Illustrations Figure 1 – Site Location Map Rear of Text Figure 2 – Boring Location Map Rear of Text Figure 3 – Regional Geology Map Rear of Text Figure 4 – Historical Seismicity and Regional Fault Map Rear of Text Figure 5 – Seismic Hazards Map Rear of Text Figure 6 – Drilled Caisson Capacity Curve Rear of Text Appendices Appendix A – References Appendix B – Boring Logs Appendix C – Results of Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Appendix D – Percolation Data Results Appendix E – Seismic Design Analysis Appendix F – Response to Review Comments Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site and Project Description The site is located southwest of the intersection of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way (Figure 1, Site Location Map). The subject property is bound to the north by Gene Autry Way, to the west by commercial buildings, to the east by State College Boulevard, and to the south by Artisan Court and a 5 story multi- family residential complex. The latitude and longitude of the site is 33.7989° and -117.8902°, respectively. The site is relatively flat with the existing ground surface at an elevation of between approximately 143 and 146 feet above mean sea level (msl). Based on a review of historical aerial photos, the site was previously developed as a commercial space until 2012, when all of the buildings were demolished. Several of the former building foot prints have been stockpiled with gravel to approximately 3.5 feet in height. Based on a review of the conceptual site plan prepared by Architects Orange, dated November 3, 2015, the proposed project is to develop the site, known as Jefferson Stadium Park, to a 1,079-unit mixed-use community. The current plan depicts three apartment buildings (in three phases), each 5 to 6 stories in height. Parking accommodations for Phase I and Phase II will be provided by a detached 6 level above grade parking structure (one for each phase) while parking accommodations for Phase III (i.e., the building adjacent to State College Boulevard) will be provided by a 2 level above grade podium parking structure over a single 9 to 11 feet deep subterranean parking level. No other subterranean structures are planned for the project at this time. In addition, leasing offices, club house fitness, retail and flex spaces are also planned for the site. Other amenities planned include a 1.1-acre park, recreational areas, and courtyards. 1.2 Scope of Work Our scope of work for this updated geotechnical exploration consisted of the following tasks:  Review of readily available published geotechnical and geological literature pertinent to the site and its vicinity, including previous geotechnical exploration reports for the project site (Southern California Geotechnical, Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 2 2005) and previous inspection and environmental reports (Southwest Inspection & Testing, Inc., 2008). References used in preparation of this report are listed in Appendix A.  Coordinate with Underground Service Alert (USA) to clear known underground utilities at the proposed locations.  Drill and sample six exploratory soil borings to a maximum depth of 71.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). The borings were placed between previously drilled borings to supplement existing data. Three of the borings were converted to temporary percolation test wells. The percolation tests were performed in general conformance with the procedures outlined in the Orange County Technical Guidance Document for Project Water Quality Management Plans.  Perform laboratory tests on representative soil samples to evaluate geotechnical engineering properties of subsurface materials. Laboratory testing included in-situ moisture content, sieve analysis, percent passing #200 screen, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, direct shear, consolidation testing, collapse potential, sand equivalent, and corrosion testing (soluble sulfate, soluble chloride, pH and minimum resistivity).  Perform an engineering evaluation of the geotechnical data to develop recommendations for design and construction.  Prepare this updated report to present our findings, conclusions and recommendations. This geotechnical exploration report was prepared in accordance with the 2013 California Building Code (CBC). 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 2.1 Field Exploration A geotechnical exploration was performed previously at the site during April of 2005 by Southern California Geotechnical (SCG, 2005). The investigation consisted of drilling 8 exploratory soil borings to depths ranging from 30 to 60 feet bgs. They encountered 3 to 6 feet of artificial fill that generally consisted of loose silty fine sands with trace amounts of clay, overlying alluvial materials. The Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 3 alluvium generally consisted of loose to medium dense fine sands, stiff silts and silty sands. Our field exploration was performed on July 21 and 22, 2015 and consisted of drilling, logging, and sampling of six hollow-stem auger borings (LB-1 through LB-3, and LP-1 through LP-3) to depths between 13 to 71.5 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered during drilling. Following completion of drilling and sampling, three of the borings (LP-1 through LP-3) were converted to temporary percolation wells. A summary of percolation test results are presented in a subsequent section. The approximate locations of all exploratory borings are shown on Figure 2, Boring Location Map. 2.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing During previous field explorations, geotechnical laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples. The testing program consisted of testing selected representative specimens, in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards, of the earth materials to obtain the following properties and characteristics:  In-situ moisture content (ASTM D2216);  Particle size analyses (ASTM D422 and ASTM D6913);  Direct Shear (ASTM D 3080);  One-Dimensional Consolidation (ASTM D 2435)  Atterberg Limits (ASTM D5333)  Collapse Potential (ASTM D4829);  Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM D1557); and  Soluble sulfate, soluble chloride, pH and minimum resistivity. The results of the in-situ moisture and dry density tests are shown on the boring logs in Appendix B. Results of other laboratory tests are presented in Appendix C. 2.3 Percolation Testing Results Three In-situ percolation tests were performed at the site. Testing procedures were performed in general accordance with the Orange County Technical Guidance Document for Project Water Quality Management Plans (Santa Ana Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 4 Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2013). Borings LP-1, LP-2, and LP-3 were drilled to 10 feet, 25 feet, and 15 feet, respectively. Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the borings were converted to temporary percolation test wells upon completion of drilling and sampling (Figure 2, Boring Location Map). A 5-foot section of a 2-inch-diameter perforated PVC pipe connected to a 2-inch diameter blank PVC casing was placed in each well. Pea gravel was filled into the annulus of the boring in the screened interval of each temporary percolation well. The percolation wells were pre-soaked prior to the testing. The water level in each well dropped more than 6 inches in 25 minutes for two consecutive readings; therefore, the test procedures for coarse grained soils were followed. After the conclusion of the percolation test, the PVC pipe was removed. The test hole was then backfilled with excess soil cuttings. Remaining excess soil cuttings were spread on-site. The test was performed to measure the percolation rate of the soils within the bottom 5 feet of each well. The percolation rate was then converted to infiltration rate by dividing the flow quantity by the flow area for each time interval. Refer to the percolation test data provided in Appendix D – Percolation Test Results. A summary table for the unfactored percolation rate is presented below. TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TESTS Test Hole ID Date Tested Test Interval (ft bgs) USCS Classification Infiltration Rate (in/hr) LP-1 7/22/15 5 - 10 SP Sand 1.67 LP-2 7/22/15 20 - 25 SP Sand 3.28 LP-3 7/22/15 10 - 15 SP Sand 11.20 It should be emphasized that the percolation test results are only representative of the tested location and depth where they are performed. Varying subsurface conditions will exist outside of the test location, which could alter the calculated infiltration rate indicated above. The test was performed using relatively clean water free of particulates and silt. The infiltration rate should be anticipated to decline over time due to accumulation of particulates in the infiltrative layer. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 5 3.0 GEOLOGIC AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 Geologic Setting The site lies near the lower reaches of the Santa Ana River and associated floodplain. Located approximately 2,000 feet east of the site is an area of groundwater recharge within the Santa Ana River channel. The surface distribution of Holocene sediments, as recorded in early editions of regional soil survey maps (Eckmann and others, 1919) suggests that the Santa Ana River has recently wandered back and forth across the Coastal Plain from Alamitos Bay to Newport Bay. Historical accounts and aerial photos (Troxell, 1938) further support the process of widespread sheet flooding being the dominant depositional process associated with the Santa Ana River floodplain prior to the construction of Prado Dam in 1941 (California Department of Water Resources, 1957) and subsequent construction of concrete lining along the lower reaches of the Santa Ana River channel. Generally, the near-surface Quaternary age, young alluvial soils below the site are characterized as massive, loose to medium dense to dense, silty fine grained sands with varying proportions of silt and clay, to thinly bedded, soft to stiff, laminated silt and clay with occasional thin beds of predominately fine grained sands. The deeper alluvial fan sediments below the site generally consist of dense, fine to coarse grained gravelly sands with thin beds of well indurated, hard silts and clays. 3.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions Based on a review of published geologic maps and on soils encountered during our subsurface investigation, the site is underlain by undocumented artificial fill and Quaternary age young alluvial fan deposits (Morton and Miller, 2006; Figure 3 Regional Geology Map). The soil units encountered during our subsurface investigation are described below. Artificial Fill, Undocumented: (Afu) The artificial fill materials encountered at the site consist primarily of yellow brown to light brown, loose, clayey sand, silty sand, sand, and sandy silt materials. The fill materials range in thickness between from approximately 4 to 9 feet across the site at the explored locations. The fill materials were likely placed during grading and construction of the preexisting commercial tilt up Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 6 buildings which took place between approximately 1972 and 1980 (NETR, 2015). In addition, 3 to 4 feet of additional fill materials that are composed of materials consistent with crushed miscellaneous base (CMB) were imported to the site during approximately July 2008 and stockpiled over the former building pad areas. Quaternary Young Alluvial Fan Deposits: (Qyf) The Quaternary age young alluvial fan deposits encountered in the borings consist of light brown to olive brown, firm to stiff, silt and loose medium dense silty sand and friable sand with varying amounts of fine and coarse subangular gravel. More detailed descriptions of the subsurface soils encountered at the site are presented on the boring logs in Appendix B. A brief description of the engineering characteristics of the subsurface soil is presented below. 3.2.1 Strength Characteristics Based on laboratory testing results and recorded blow counts, the undisturbed onsite soils exhibit adequate shear strength to provide support for the proposed improvements. 3.2.2 Compressibility Potential The blow count records and consolidation test results suggested that the onsite undisturbed soils exhibit low to moderate compressibility characteristics when subjected to the anticipated loading from the proposed improvements. Based on the laboratory test results the potential for soils to hydro-collapse is considered low. 3.2.3 Expansive Soils The alluvial soils onsite are predominantly sands and silty sands; therefore, the soils are expected to have a very low expansion potential per ASTM D 4829. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 7 3.2.4 Corrosivity As a screening for potentially corrosive soil, a representative soil sample was tested during our study to determine minimum resistivity, chloride content, and pH. The test results are included in Appendix C of this report and are summarized in the following table. Test Results General Classification of Hazard Water-Soluble Sulfate in Soil (ppm) 96 to 131 Low Sulfate Exposure on Concrete Water-Soluble Chloride in Soil (ppm) 30 to 31 Low Chloride Exposure on Concrete pH 7.5 to 8.02 Neutral Minimum Resistivity (saturated, ohm-cm) 3,125 to 5,350 Corrosive to Buried Metals Based on the test results, the onsite soils are not expected to pose a significant potential for sulfate reaction with concrete. However, the onsite soils are considered corrosive to ferrous metals. 3.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered during our field exploration to the total depth drilled of 71.5 feet bgs. Based on the current proposed residential development scheme, groundwater is not expected to pose a constraint during construction. According to groundwater information obtained through the California Geological Survey (CGS) in the vicinity of the site, historically shallowest groundwater depth is greater than 50 feet bgs (CGS, 1997). Based on groundwater data presented in this report, seasonal fluctuations in groundwater elevations should be anticipated over time. Local perched groundwater conditions or surface seepage may develop once site development is completed and stormwater infiltration and landscape irrigation commences. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 8 4.0 SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 4.1 Faulting Based on our review of the available literature, no known active or potentially active faults traverse the site, and the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (CGS, 1986; Bryant and Hart, 2007). The locations of the closest active faults to the site were generated using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) website (USGS, 2008b). The closest active fault to the site is the Puente Hills Blind Thrust fault which is located approximately 5.3 miles from the site. Other major active faults near the site include the San Joaquin Hills Blind Thrust, Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone, and the Elsinore Fault Zone, which are located approximately 7.3, 9.1 and 10.3 miles from the site, respectively. Considering the locations of these faults relative to the site, the potential for surface fault rupture occurrence at the site is considered low. Other nearby faults with respect to the site are shown on Figure 4, Historic Seismicity and Regional Fault Map. 4.2 Ground Motion Study Principal seismic hazard that could affect the site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake occurring along several major active or potentially active faults in southern California. The site is expected to experience moderate to strong ground shaking resulted from the earthquake faults in the region. Using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) (http://geohazards.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps) seismic design maps and tools application, the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) for the site was calculated at 0.502g. The modal earthquake is a Magnitude 7 earthquake with a distance of 9.0 miles from the site. The ground motion study and results are included in Appendix E. 4.3 Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is the loss of soil strength or stiffness due to increasing pore-water pressure during severe ground shaking. Liquefaction is associated primarily with loose (low density), saturated, fine- to medium-grained, cohesionless soils. The site is not mapped within an area prone to liquefaction as shown on the State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle (CGS, 1998), see Figure 5, Seismic Hazard Map. Groundwater was not Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 9 encountered during our exploration to a depth of 71.5 feet; therefore, based on these considerations the potential for liquefaction occurring at the site is considered low. 4.4 Seismically-Induced Settlement Strong ground motion during earthquakes tends to rearrange looser soils particles into a more compact arrangement, especially in granular soil deposits. The cumulative effects of soil particles rearrangement during an earthquake will result in settlement of the soil column. In general, a poorly graded granular deposit is more susceptible to settlement than a fine-grained or well-graded soil. Earthquake-induced settlement occurs in soil column both above and below groundwater. Earthquake-induced settlement calculations were performed in the computer program Cliq in conjunction with the liquefaction analysis. Based on our analysis, the earthquake-induced settlement was estimated to be on the order of 1 inch for the site. The seismically-induced differential settlement may be assumed to be on the order of one-half of the total settlement over a horizontal distance of 40 feet. The results of the analysis are also included in Appendix E. 4.5 Seismically-Induced Landslides The project site is not mapped as an area susceptible to seismically-induced landslide on the Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle (CGS, 1998) as shown on Figure 5, Seismic Hazard Map. The topography of the site is relatively flat. Therefore, the potential of landslides at the site is considered nil. 4.6 Flooding The site is located in the Prado Dam inundation area based on the City’s General Plan. The project site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard zone as by Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) flood maps (https://msc.fema.gov/portal). However, the northwestern corner of the site is located within the FEMA 500-year flood hazard zone. 4.7 Seiches and Tsunamis Seiches are large waves generated in enclosed bodies of water in response to ground shaking. Tsunamis are waves generated in large bodies of water by fault Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 10 displacement or major ground movement. Based on the lack of nearby enclosed water bodies and the inland location of the site, seiche and tsunami risks at the site are considered negligible. 5.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS No evidence of adverse geological or geotechnical hazards was noted at the site that will preclude the development of the project. Presented below is a summary of findings based upon the results of our geotechnical evaluation of the site:  The site is not located within an area shown as susceptible to liquefaction on the California Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle. The potential for liquefaction and the likelihood of earthquake-induced ground failures related to soil liquefaction or cyclic softening is low.  The onsite undisturbed soils exhibit adequate strength and low compressibility characteristics when subjected to the anticipated loading of the proposed improvements.  Based on field observation and comparison of laboratory test results to California Building Code guidelines for expansive soils (CBC, 2013), the near surface onsite soils will likely exhibit very low expansion potential when subjected to increase in moisture.  Concrete in contact with the near surface onsite soil is expected to have low exposure to water-soluble sulfates and low exposure to chloride in the soil. The onsite soil is considered corrosive to ferrous metal.  The subsurface soils are anticipated to be readily excavated using conventional earthmoving equipment in good working condition. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations have been developed based on the exhibited engineering properties of the onsite soils and their anticipated behavior both during and after construction. Recommendations are specifically provided for design of foundation, at-grade floor slabs, concrete flatwork, and other incidental improvements associated with this project. The geotechnical engineer should review the grading plan, foundation plans, and specifications when they are available to verify that the recommendations presented in this report have been properly interpreted and incorporated. Furthermore, Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 11 the actual subsurface conditions should be verified for consistence with those encountered within our exploratory borings during construction. Recommendations in this report may be revised, if necessary. 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations Moderate to strong ground shaking due to seismic activity is expected at the site during the life span of the project. The following are the current code-based and site-specific seismic design parameters for new structures: Categorization/Coefficients Code-Based (1) (2) Site Longitude (decimal degrees) West -117.8902 Site Latitude (decimal degrees) North 33.7989 Site Class (§1613.3.2) D Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, Ss (Figure 1613.3(1)) 1.492 Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1s Period, S1 (Figure 1613.3(2)) 0.543 Short Period Site Coefficient at 0.2s Period, Fa (Table 1613.3.3(1)) 1.0 Long Period Site Coefficient at 1s Period, Fv (Table 1613.3.3(2)) 1.5 Adjusted Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, SMS 1.492 Adjusted Spectral Response Acceleration at 1s Period, SM1 0.814 Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, SDS 0.995 Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 1s Period, SD1 0.543 1. All were derived from the USGS web page: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php 2. All coefficients in units of g (spectral acceleration) 6.2 Site Grading Site Preparation - Prior to construction, debris and other unsuitable materials at the site should be completely removed and disposed of accordingly. The existing artificial fill materials, including the stockpiled CMB materials are not suitable to use to provide support for the new buildings and other improvements in their current condition. However, the materials free of debris or other deleterious materials may be reused as fill material during future grading. Efforts should be made to locate any existing or abandoned utility lines in the area. Existing utility conduits should be removed or rerouted if they interfere with the proposed construction, and the resulting cavities should be properly backfilled and compacted. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 12 Overexcavation and Recompaction – The subgrade soils will consist of mostly silty fine sands. To provide a uniform support for the foundations and at-grade floor slabs, it is recommended that the top 2 to 4 feet of the exposed subgrade immediately below the bearing subgrade of the new foundations (See Section 6.3 for specific recommendations) and at-grade floor slabs be overexcavated and moisture-conditioned to three percent above optimum and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM D1557. Recompaction should extend laterally where possible to a distance equal to the depth of the excavation below the foundation. Areas outside the proposed building area that are planned for incidental improvements, such as access ramps and hardscape, should be overexcavated to a minimum of 1 foot below the bearing subgrade of the planned improvements. The overexcavation should extend horizontally to a distance equal to the depth of the excavation below the finish subgrade. The actual depth and extent of recompaction should be determined at the time of construction by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Subgrade Preparation – To provide a uniform supporting subgrade for placing fill or construction of other improvements, the excavation bottom should be observed and evaluated by Leighton to verify competent soil is exposed. The subgrade surface should then be scarified to a depth of six inches, moisture- conditioned to three percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the ASTM D1557 laboratory maximum density. Fill Placement and Compaction – The onsite soil, free of organic material, debris, and oversize materials (greater than 6 inches in largest dimension), is suitable to be used in general fills. Clayey soils are considered expansive and are not suitable for use under building area. If import soil is needed for the project, it should be evaluated and tested by the geotechnical consultant before delivery to the site. In general, import material should be non-organic and free of debris or other deleterious materials, and low in expansion potential with an Expansion Index less than 20. All fill soil should be placed in thin, loose lifts less than 8 inches thick, moisture-conditioned as necessary to approximately two to three percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted using appropriate equipment to the minimum of 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. Further, base material should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 13 Utility Trench Backfill – The utility trench subgrade should be firm and unyielding and should be observed and tested by the geotechnical consultant prior to placing pipe bedding materials. The bedding materials should be compacted free draining sand, gravel, or crushed rock. If sand is used, the sand should have a sand equivalent greater than 30. Pipe bedding should extend below the pipe to a depth in accordance with the pipe manufacturer’s specifications. The pipe bedding material should extend to at least 12 inches over the top of the pipe. Trench excavations above the pipe bedding may be backfilled with suitable onsite soils under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. All fill soils should be placed in loose lifts, moisture-conditioned to two to three percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. Lift thickness will be dependent on the equipment used as suggested in the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC). The fill soils should extend to the bottom of the base course for any new pavement. Base material should be moisture-conditioned between optimum and two percent above optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction based on ASTM D1557. All compaction should be performed by mechanical means. Jetting of trench backfill is not recommended. 6.3 Foundation Design No structural loading information is available at this time. The following three foundations system (either one system or a combination of systems) are all feasible for the project. It is recommended that the geotechnical engineer be consulted in selecting the foundation schemes when the structural loading information for the buildings becomes available. Conventional Shallow Foundation System A conventional shallow foundation system consisting of isolated column footings and continuous wall foundation should be established on at least 2 feet of engineered fill prepared as recommended in Section 6.2 of this report may be used to support the apartment buildings. For foundations associated with the new parking structures, the engineered fill thickness should be increased to 4 feet. The foundations should be at least 2 feet wide and embedded 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. A maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,600 pounds per square foot (psf) and 3,250 psf may be used to design a continuous Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 14 wall foundation up to 8 feet wide and an isolated column footing up to 10 feet square. The total and differential settlements under the recommended bearing pressure are estimated to be less than 1 inch and ½ inch, respectively, provided the foundations are designed in accordance with the recommendations of this report and proper engineering observation is conducted at the time of construction. The differential settlement is anticipated to occur over a span of 40 feet. Due to granular nature of the site soil, a majority of the settlement is anticipated to occur during construction. The recommended bearing pressures are for dead and sustained live loads and may be increased by one-third to support short-term loading such as wind and seismic loads. Soil resistance available to withstand lateral loads on a shallow foundation is a function of the frictional resistance along the base of the footing and the passive resistance that may develop as the face of the structure tends to move into the soil. The frictional resistance between the base of the foundation and the subgrade soil may be computed using an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.25. The passive resistance may be computed using an allowable (factor of safety of 1.5 applied) equivalent fluid pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming there is constant contact between the footing and undisturbed soil or engineered fill The maximum pressure should not exceed 5,000 psf. This allowable passive pressure is applicable for level (ground slope equal to or flatter than 5:1, horizontal:vertical) conditions only. No reduction is required when combining friction and passive pressure. Mat Foundation For preliminary design, the following parameters may be used for design of a mat foundation system established on at least 2 feet of engineered fill: Embedment Depth (feet) Allowable Bearing Pressure (psf) Subgrade Reaction Modulus (k1) (pci) 3 feet 2,750 psf 120 5 feet 3,000 psf 125 10 feet 3,500 psf 150 15 feet 4,000 psf 175 Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 15 Bearing pressure and modulus values for intermediate embedment depth can be estimated using linear interpolation. The subgrade reaction value at the design embedment depth should be adjusted using a reduction factor (Rf) for dimensions of foundations having a length (L) and width (B) using the following formula: k (L x B) = k1 [ (𝐵+ 1)/2𝐵 ]2 x Rf where Rf = (1 + 0.5 𝐵/𝐿)⁄1.5 The modulus of subgrade reaction is a function of foundation dimension and soil properties. An interactive process between the geotechnical and structural engineers is expected to develop a compatible soil-structure interaction model as the foundation plan becomes available. The lateral load resistance recommended used for the shallow foundation system may also be used for the mat foundation. Drilled Caissons The recommended downward axial capacity versus pile length for a single 16- inch and 24-inch diameter cast-in-place concrete drilled caisson is presented on Figure 6. The structural engineer should apply an appropriate safety factor when calculating the allowable capacity. No reduction in axial capacity if the caisson is spaced at a distance of 3 times its diameter or larger. The settlement of the drilled caisson is anticipated to be less than one-half inch. For calculating lateral load resistance, an allowable passive pressure of 600 psf per foot of depth may be used. The maximum passive pressure should be limited to 6,000 psf. The lateral capacity should be reduced by 25 percent if the caisson is spaced less than 5 times its diameter. It is assumed that the top of the caisson is allowed to move ½ inch laterally under transient loading condition without adversely affecting the structure it is supporting. Soil-structural interaction response analysis for the caissons can be provided if requested. 6.4 Slab-on-Grade Concrete slabs-on-grade (at-grade slab) should be designed by the structural engineer in accordance with 2013 CBC requirements for very low expansive soil. A conventionally reinforced concrete slab-on-grade should be at least 4 inches Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 16 thick and reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 rebar placed at 18-inches on- center, each direction (perpendicularly), mid-depth in the slab. More stringent requirements may be required by the structural engineer and/or architect. A vapor retarder consisting of a 10-mil visqueen should be used for indoor slab or area with moisture sensitive flooring or equipment will be placed. The vapor retarder should be overlapped with a minimum of 4 inches and underlain by 2 inches of sand. To protect the moisture retarder from damage due to construction activities, an additional 2 inches of sand should be placed atop the moisture retarder. Minor cracking of concrete after curing due to expansion, drying and shrinkage is normal and should be expected. However, cracking is often aggravated by a high water-to-cement ratio, high concrete temperature at the time of placement, small nominal aggregate size, and rapid moisture loss due to hot, dry, and/or windy weather conditions during placement and curing. Cracking due to temperature and moisture fluctuations can also be expected. The use of low- slump concrete or low water/cement ratios can reduce the potential for shrinkage cracking. Concrete placement during hot weather should be minimized due to the potential for slab curling. To reduce the potential for excessive cracking, concrete slabs-on-grade should be provided with construction or weakened plane joints at frequent intervals. 6.5 Concrete Flatwork The exposed subgrade for concrete flatwork should be scarified to a depth of at least 4 inches, moisture-conditioned to approximately two to three percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to 90 percent of the ASTM Test Method D1557 laboratory maximum density prior to concrete placement. As stated earlier, cracking of concrete is normal as it cures due to drying and shrinkage, and should be expected. However, cracking is often aggravated by a high water/cement ratio, high concrete temperature at the time of placement, small nominal aggregate size, and rapid moisture loss due to hot, dry, and/or windy weather conditions during placement and curing. Cracking due to temperature and moisture fluctuations can also be expected. The use of low slump concrete can reduce the potential for shrinkage cracking. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 17 6.6 Temporary Excavations All temporary excavations without shoring support, should be performed in accordance with project plans, specifications and all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements, see: http://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/sb4a6.html Excavations 5 feet or deeper should be laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements before personnel are allowed to enter. No surcharge loads should be permitted within a horizontal distance equal to the height of cut or 5 feet, whichever is greater from the top of the cut, unless the cut is shored appropriately. During construction, the soil conditions should be regularly evaluated to verify that conditions are as anticipated. The contractor shall be responsible for providing the “competent person” required by OSHA standards to evaluate soil conditions. Soil types will vary, but Type C soils is expected at the site in most area. Close coordination between the competent person and the geotechnical engineer should be maintained to facilitate construction while providing safe excavations. 6.7 Temporary Shoring Should adequate space onsite not be obtainable to layback excavations for any subterranean construction at inclinations no steeper than 2:1, then the excavation should be retained by a temporary shoring system. Vertical cuts are not recommended at the site. Support of all adjacent existing structures without distress is the contractor’s responsibility. These shoring systems, should they be required, adjacent to existing structures should be designed by a California licensed civil or structural engineer. The contractor should forward their plans for the support system to Leighton for pre-construction review. In addition, it should be the contractor’s responsibility to undertake a pre-construction survey with benchmarks and photographs of the adjacent improvements should shoring be required. Type of shoring used to support temporary excavation should be left to the contractor’s judgment based on specific site conditions and construction safety. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 18 The following are recommendations for designing a cantilever or raker-braced shoring system: Shoring Type Lateral Earth Pressure (Level Backfill) Cantilever 32 psf/ft Raker-braced 30H The recommended lateral earth pressure for a raker-braced shoring system should consist of a trapezoidal distribution with zero pressure at the top and bottom of the shoring and 30H (in psf) between 0.25H and 0.75H, where H is the height of the shoring in feet. NO safety factor has been applied to the recommendations below unless noted otherwise. The shoring engineer should incorporate an adequate safety factor in designing the shoring system. In addition to the recommended earth pressure, the walls should be designed to resist any applicable surcharge loads behind the shoring. The solider beams should be spaced at least 2.5 times the drilled hole on-center with a maximum spacing of 8 feet. The portion of a soldier beam that extends below the excavation may be used to provide passive resistance for the shoring system. A passive pressure of 600 psf per foot of depth may be used for a soldier pile embedded in competent native soils below the excavation. The maximum passive pressure should be limited to 6,000 psf. To develop the full lateral value, provisions should be taken to assure firm contact between the solider beams and the undisturbed soils. The shoring engineer should not consider any passive resistance to a depth equal to one drilled hole diameter of the soldier beam below the excavation line. A friction coefficient of 0.5 may be used between the soldier beam and the retained soil. When using the frictional resistance between the soldier pile and the soil, it is assumed that the drilled hole of the soldier pile will be backfilled with lean-mix concrete, and there is full contact between the lean-mix concrete and the retained soil. As mentioned earlier, the drilling contractor should be prepared to use special techniques and measures, if necessary, to permit the proper installation of the Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 19 soldier beams in case of caving and raveling of isolated loose soil layers or local groundwater seepage that may exist. Lagging should be provided between the soldier beams to control sloughing. Lagging should be placed in such a manner to maintain a tight soil to lagging contact. All voids behind the lagging should be filled with compacted materials or slurry. Lagging may be installed with a maximum spacing of 1½ inches to allow drainage from behind the wall. The soldier piles should be designed for the full anticipated lateral pressure. However, the pressure on the lagging will be less due to arching in the soils. For clear spans of up to 8 feet, we recommend that the lagging be designed for a semi-circular distribution of earth pressure where the maximum pressure is 300 psf at the mid-line between soldier piles, and 0 psf at the soldier piles. The rakers may be supported on inclined footings established in competent native soils at the bottom of the excavation. The raker foundation should be embedded at least two feet below ground surface. The allowable bearing capacity for a two-foot wide raker foundation is as follows: Raker Foundation Design Parameters Inclination from Horizontal 45˚ 55˚ Allowable Bearing Pressure 2,500 2,250 The performance of the shoring system should be monitored on a regular basis during and after installation. The monitoring should consist of surveying of the lateral and vertical locations of the tops of all the soldier piles. The survey data should be submitted to the shoring engineer and geotechnical consultant for review. It is recommended that the maximum deflection behind the shoring be limited to between one-half inch to one inch. Although groundwater was not encountered within the anticipated depth of excavation during our exploration, it is prudent to include provisions for nuisance water removal in case groundwater seepage is encountered during excavation. We recommend that the adjacent existing structures and streets be surveyed for horizontal and vertical locations. Also, a survey of existing cracks and offsets in the streets should be performed and recorded along with photographic records. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 20 6.8 Earth Retaining Structures The following parameters may be used for the design of retaining structures backfilled with non-expansive soil: Condition Equivalent Fluid Unit Weight for Granular Backfill) Active 32 psf/ft (Level Backfill) At-Rest 50 psf/ft (Level Backfill) Seismic 20 psf/ft *Inverted Triangular Distribution and only required where retaining wall is taller than 12 feet Unrestrained walls that are free to rotate or deflect may be designed using the active earth pressure. For restrained walls that are fixed against rotation (basement walls), the at-rest condition should be used. The lateral passive resistance should be taken into account only if it is ensured that the soil providing passive resistance, embedded against the foundation elements, will remain intact with time. We also recommend using the at-rest pressure for design of walls supporting settlement-sensitive structures, such as adjacent buildings and improvements, if any. The above-recommended lateral pressures are based on a granular soil with total unit weight of 120 pcf. NO safety factor has been applied to the recommendations. The structural engineer should incorporate an adequate safety factor in designing the retaining wall system. Backfill for the retaining structures should be granular, relatively non-expansive (Expansion Index less than 20) soil and be constructed with a backdrain system. The backdrain should be sloped at a minimum of one percent toward an approved non-erosive outlet. The non-expansive on-site soil free of debris or other deleterious materials is suitable to be used as backfill behind retaining structure. Backfill for retaining walls should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Relatively light construction equipment should be used to backfill the retaining walls. The walls should also be waterproofed or at least damp-proofed, depending upon the degree of moisture protection desired. Surface drainage should be designed to direct water away from foundations and toward approved drainage devices. Irrigation of landscaping should be controlled to maintain, as much as possible, Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 21 consistent moisture content sufficient to provide healthy plant growth without overwatering. Lateral pressures from other surcharge and superimposed loads (for example, from vehicle traffic and adjacent structures) should be added to the above recommended lateral earth pressures if the loads fall within a projected area of an imaginary line extended at an angle of 45 degrees from the wall foundation. Thirty percent of the surcharge load may be used for unrestrained walls and fifty percent of the surcharge may be used for restrained walls. The foundations for retaining walls may be designed for a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,600 psf supported by at least two feet of compacted fill. The bottom of the footing is recommended to be embedded at least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior grade. The post-construction settlement of retaining wall foundations designed in accordance with the recommendations of this report is estimated to be less than one inch. 6.9 Drilled Caissons Construction Bottoms of drilled caissons (cast-in-place piles) excavations should be reasonably free of loose soil before reinforcing steel is installed and concrete is placed. We recommend that Leighton & Associates, Inc. observe pile drilling to establish that the caissons are founded in suitable undisturbed native materials and constructed in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. Cast-in-place piles should be constructed in accordance with Section 205- 3.3.2 of the 2012 Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book). Casing of each shaft may be necessary if excessive caving of the drilled hole is encountered. If water cannot be removed from excavations prior to concrete placement, then concrete will need to be placed by tremie pipe or concrete pump hose. The concrete should be tremied or pumped to the bottom of the hole keeping the tremie or pipe below the surface of the concrete to avoid entrapment of water in placed concrete. As concrete is poured, water is displaced out of the hole. Some difficult drilling through the fill soils may be experienced due to rubble in the fill. The drilling contractor should be equipped to penetrate through this rubble, if encountered. We understand that closely spaced piles may be required for this site. Care should be taken to avoid “blow-outs” into open drilled shafts when placing fresh Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 22 concrete in adjacent closely spaced drilled shafts. Fluid pressure of uncured concrete under on-the-order-of (≈) 40-feet of head can deform or displace soils into an adjacent closely spaced shaft. For new piles placed closer-than (<) 2½ diameters on center, construction sequencing should require curing concrete in one shaft before drilling the adjacent closely spaced shaft. Or, multiple (two or more) temporary steel casings can be used to stabilize multiple (two or more) adjacent closely-spaced shafts simultaneously. Other options can be considered as the means-and-methods of the foundation contractor. 6.10 Corrosion Protection Measures Based on results of our laboratory testing, concrete structures in contact with the onsite soil will likely have “negligible” exposure to water-soluble sulfates in the soil. Therefore, common Type II Portland cement may be used for concrete construction in contact with site soils. Subgrade soil should be tested for water- soluble sulfate content prior to final design of the concrete structures. Import fill soil should be tested for corrosivity and sulfate attack before import to the site. Further testing of the subgrade soils near finish grade should be performed to verify the results. Based on corrosivity test results, the onsite soil is considered corrosive to ferrous metals. Therefore, based on these results, ferrous pipe buried in moist to wet site earth materials should be avoided by using high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and/or other non-ferrous pipe when possible. Ferrous pipe can also be protected by polyethylene bags, tap or coatings, di- electric fittings or other means to separate the pipe from on-site soils. A qualified corrosion engineer should be consulted for necessary mitigations for corrosive soil. 6.11 Surface Drainage Surface drainage should be designed to direct water away from foundations and toward approved drainage devices. Irrigation of landscaping should be controlled to maintain, as much as possible, consistent moisture content sufficient to provide healthy plant growth without over watering. 6.12 Geotechnical Services During Construction Our geotechnical recommendations are contingent upon Leighton providing geotechnical observation and testing services during earthwork and foundation Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 23 construction. There is a potential for encountering deeper undocumented fill or otherwise unacceptable existing soil between or beyond our boring locations. We are unaware of any existing fill placement documentation for these building sites. Therefore, inconsistent existing fill materials and consistencies may be encountered during construction, possibly requiring revised geotechnical recommendations. Our geotechnical recommendations provided in this report are based on information available at the time the report was prepared and may change as plans are developed. Additional geotechnical exploration, testing and/or analysis may be required based on final plans. Leighton should review site grading, foundation and shoring (if any) plans when available, to comment further on geotechnical aspects of this project and check to see general conformance of final project plans to recommendations presented in this report. Leighton should be retained to provide geotechnical observation and testing during excavation and all phases of earthwork. Our conclusions and recommendations should be reviewed and verified by us during construction and revised accordingly if geotechnical conditions encountered vary from our findings and interpretations. Geotechnical observation and testing should be provided:  During all excavation,  During compaction of all fill materials,  After excavation of all footings and prior to placement of concrete,  During pile and shoring installation,  During utility trench backfilling and compaction,  During pavement subgrade and base preparation, and/or  If and when any unusual geotechnical conditions are encountered. 7.0 LIMITATIONS Leighton’s work was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this report. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 24 As in many projects, conditions revealed in excavations may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant and additional recommendations be obtained, as warranted. The identification and testing of hazardous, toxic or contaminated materials were outside the scope of Leighton’s work. Should such materials be encountered at any time, or their existence is suspected, all measures stipulated in local, county, state and federal regulations, as applicable, should be implemented. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or a duly authorized agent acting on behalf of the owner to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the necessary design consultants for the project and incorporated into the plans; and that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contracts carry out such recommendations in the field. The findings of this report are considered valid as of the present date; however, changes in the condition of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or the work of man on the subject or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in standards of practice may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may at some future time be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside Leighton’s control. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data that were obtained from a necessarily limited number of observations, site visits, excavations, samples and testes. Such information can be obtained only with respect to the specific locations explored, and therefore may not completely define all subsurface conditions throughout the site. The nature of many sites is that differing geotechnical and/or geological conditions can occur within small distances and under varying climatic conditions. Furthermore, changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report should be considered preliminary if unanticipated conditions are encountered and additional explorations, testing and analyses may be necessary to develop alternative recommendations. This report has been prepared for the express use of JPI Real Estate Acquisition. and its design consultants, and only as related expressly to the assessment of the geotechnical constraints of developing the subject site and for construction purposes. This report may not be used by others or for other projects without the express written consent of JPI Real Estate Acquisition and our firm. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 25 If parties other than Leighton are engaged to provide construction geotechnical services, they must be notified that they will be required to assume complete responsibility for the geotechnical phase of the project by concurring with the findings and recommendations in this report or by providing alternative recommendations. Any persons using this report for bidding or construction purposes should perform such independent investigations as they deem necessary to satisfy themselves as to the surface and/or subsurface conditions to be encountered and the procedures to be used in the performance of work on the subject site. Geotechnical-Engineering Report Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and ProjectsGeotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a constructor — a construction contractor — or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical- engineering study is unique, each geotechnical-engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one except you should rely on this geotechnical-engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one — not even you — should apply this report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read the Full ReportSerious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical-engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. Geotechnical Engineers Base Each Report on a Unique Set of Project-Specific FactorsGeotechnical engineers consider many unique, project-specific factors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client’s goals, objectives, and risk-management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on a geotechnical-engineering report that was:• not prepared for you;• not prepared for your project;• not prepared for the specific site explored; or• completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical-engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when it’s changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light-industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse;• the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure;• the composition of the design team; or• project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes—even minor ones—and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can ChangeA geotechnical-engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the geotechnical engineer performed the study. Do not rely on a geotechnical-engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or natural events, such as floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Contact the geotechnical engineer before applying this report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional OpinionsSite exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ — sometimes significantly — from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide geotechnical-construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report’s Recommendations Are Not FinalDo not overrely on the confirmation-dependent recommendations included in your report. Confirmation-dependent recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report’s confirmation-dependent recommendations if that engineer does not perform the geotechnical-construction observation required to confirm the recommendations’ applicability. A Geotechnical-Engineering Report Is Subject to MisinterpretationOther design-team members’ misinterpretation of geotechnical-engineering reports has resulted in costly Important Information about This Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. While you cannot eliminate all such risks, you can manage them. The following information is provided to help. problems. Confront that risk by having your geo technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review pertinent elements of the design team’s plans and specifications. Constructors can also misinterpret a geotechnical-engineering report. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing geotechnical construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Engineer’s LogsGeotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical-engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Constructors a Complete Report and GuidanceSome owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make constructors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give constructors the complete geotechnical-engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise constructors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report’s accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure constructors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read Responsibility Provisions CloselySome clients, design professionals, and constructors fail to recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Environmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical-engineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own environmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk-management guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with MoldDiverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a comprehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold-prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, many mold- prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the geotechnical- engineering study whose findings are conveyed in this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services performed in connection with the geotechnical engineer’s study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold prevention. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this report will not of itself be sufficient to prevent mold from growing in or on the structure involved. Rely, on Your GBC-Member Geotechnical Engineer for Additional AssistanceMembership in the Geotechnical Business Council of the Geoprofessional Business Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk-confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with you GBC-Member geotechnical engineer for more information. 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2015 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, or its contents, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBA’s specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geotechnical-engineering report. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be commiting negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation. Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 0 2,000 4,000 Feet Figure 1 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton 1 " = 2,000 ' Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F01_SLM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/6/2015 5:12:07 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 SITE LOCATION MAP Proposed Residential DevelopmentVacant Property on the SW Corner of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California Approximate Site Location &? &? &< &? &< &< &? &< &? &?&<&? &? &< T.D . 7 1 . 5 ' T. D . 1 1 . 5 ' T.D . 1 6 . 5 ' T.D . 7 1 . 5 ' T.D.76.5' T. D . 2 6 . 5 ' B- 8 B- 6 LB - 1 B- 7 LP - 1 LP - 3 B- 4 LB - 2 B- 3 B-2 LB-3 B-1 B- 5 LP - 2 Ma p S a v e d a s V : \ D r a f t i n g \ 1 1 0 9 1 \ 0 0 1 \ m a p s \ 1 1 0 9 1 _ F 0 2 _ B L M _ 2 0 1 5 _ 1 0 _ 3 0 . m x d o n 1 0 / 3 0 / 2 0 1 5 3 : 1 5 : 3 8 P M BO R I N G L O C A T I O N M A P Pr o p o s e d J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Va c a n t P r o p e r t y o n t h e S W C o r n e r o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d a n d G e n e A u t r y W a y An a h e i m , O r a n g e C o u n t y , C a l i f o r n i a Figure 2 Leighton ³01 0 0 2 0 0 Fe e t Sc a l e : Ba s e M a p : E S R I A r c G I S O n l i n e 2 0 1 5 Th e m a t i c I n f o r m a t i o n : L e i g h t o n Ba s e : A r c h i t e c s O r a n g e 1 " = 1 0 0 ' Pr o j e c t : 1 1 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 En g / G e o l : V P I / J M P Au t h o r : L e i g h t o n G e o m a t i c s ( a s a k o w i c z ) Da t e : O c t o b e r 2 0 1 5 Le g e n d &< Ap p r o x i m a t e L o c a t i o n o f E x p l o r a t o r y S o i l B o r i n g W i t h T o t a l D e p t h ( T . D . ) . Gr o u n d w a t e r N o t E n c o u n t e r e d D u r i n g D r i l l i n g ( L + A , 2 0 1 5 ) Ap p r o x i m a t e L o c a t i o n o f E x p l o r a t o r y S o i l B o r i n g a n d T e m p . P e r c W e l l Wi t h T o t a l D e p t h ( T . D . ) . G r o u n d w a t e r N o t E n c o u n t e r e d D u r i n g D r i l l i n g ( L + A , 2 0 1 5 ) &? Ap p r o x i m a t e L o c a t i o n o f E x p l o r a t o r y S o i l B o r i n g (S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a G e o t e c h n i c a l , 2 0 0 5 ) &<LB - 1 T.D . 7 1 . 5 ' LB - 1 B- 1 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 0 4,000 8,000 Feet Figure 3 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton, USGS 1 " = 4,000 ' Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F03_RGM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/6/2015 5:24:07 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAPProposed Residential DevelopmentVacant Property on the SW Corner of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California ApproximateSite Location Legend !!!!!!! !! !! !!!!!!Qya - Young Alluvial ValleyDeposits Qyf - Young Alluvial FanDeposits Qof - Old Alluvial FanDeposits Qw - Alluvial WashDeposits Qya Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qw Qw Qof Qof Qof Qof Qyf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! !!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! P elic a n Hill fa ult Peralt aHillsfa u l t W a l n u t C r e e k f a u l t ElModenofault THU MS-HuntingtonBeach Los Ala m ito sfault Central Avenuef a ult Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, andthe GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 048 Miles Figure 4 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton, CGS, Bryant 2010 1 " = 4 miles Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F03_RFM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/5/2015 5:26:26 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 HISTORIC SEISMICITY AND REGINAL FAULT MAP Proposed Residential DevelopmentVacant Property on the SW Corner of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California ApproximateSite Location Legend Historic (<200 years) Holocene (<10K years) Quaternary (<1,6M years) Pre-Quaternary (>1,6M years) Earthquakes 1769-2014 Moment Magnitude Range !4 - 5 !5 - 6 !6 - 7 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 0 4,000 8,000 Feet Figure 5 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton, CGS 1 " = 4,000 ' Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F06_SHM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/6/2015 5:26:24 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 SEISMIC HAZARD MAP Proposed Residential Development16 Acre Site NE & SW of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California ApproximateSite Location Legend Liquefaction Susceptibility Zone Uplift Capacity can be taken as 40% of downward capacity.Figure 6 JPI Stadium Park Anaheim, California Drilled Caisson Capacity Curve Project No. 10274.010 Date 8-11-15 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Em b e d m e n t b e l o w P i l e C a p ( f t ) Ultimate Downward Axial Capacity (kips) 16" Diameter 24" Diameter APPENDIX A REFERENCES Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 10274.010 A-1 APPENDIX A References American Concrete Institute (ACI), 2008, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary, an ACI Standard, reported by ACI Committee 318, January 2008. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2013, Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-10, Third Printing, Errata Incorporated through March 15, 2013. Boore, D. M. and Atkinson, G. M., 2008, Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 24, No. 1, February 2008. Bryant, W.A. and Hart, E.W., Interim Revision 2007, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones Maps, California Geological Survey Special Publication 42. Butlers, J., 1997, Analysis of Energy Measurement Methods of Standard Penetration Test Driving Systems, Master Thesis Submitted at Utah State University in Logan. California Building Standards Commission, 2013, 2013 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, Based on 2012 International Building Code, Effective January 1, 2014. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2007, Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Project Planning and Design Guide, May 2007. California Department of Water Resources, 1957, The California Water Plan: Bulletin 3, 246 p. California Geological Survey (CGS; formerly California Division of Mines and Geology, CDMG), 1997, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5 Minute Quadrangles, Orange County, California, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 Appendix A. References (cont’d) A-2 , 1998, State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, Anaheim Quadrangle, Revised Official Map, released April 15, 1998, map scale 1:24,000. , 2000, CD-ROM containing digital images of Official Maps of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones that affect the Southern Region, DMG CD 2000-003 2000. Eckmanm E.C., Strahorn, A.T., Holmes, L.C., and Guersney, J.E., 1919, Soils Map of the Anaheim Area, California: United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Soils, in cooperation with the University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station, scale 1:62,000 Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003, Flood Hazard Map Image, ESRI/FEMA Hazard Awareness. https://msc.fema.gov/portal Morton D.M., and Miller, F.K., 2006, Geologic Map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana, 30’ x 60’ Quadrangles, California, USGS Open File Report 2006-1217, map scale 1:100,000. NETR, Historical Aerials and Topographic Maps of the Site, copyright 2011, http://www.historicaerials.com/ Petersen, M. D., Bryan, W. A., Cramer, C. H., Cao, Tianquing, Reichle, M. S., Frankel, A. D., Lienkaemper, J. J., McCrory, P. A., and Schwartz, D. P., 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California: California Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 96-08, 33 p. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/Preliminary and/or Project Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs), dated December 20, 2013. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 1999, Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction Hazards in California, dated March 1999. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R., and Mesri, G., 1996, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publishers, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 Appendix A. References (cont’d) A-3 Troxell, H.C., 1942, Floods of March 1938 in Southern California, Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and Works Progress Administration, United States Department of the Interior. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2008a, Interactive Deaggregations, Based on the 2008 update source and attenuation models of the NSHMP (Peterson and others, 2008), USGS website, <https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/> ______, 2008b, National Seismic Hazard Maps – Fault Parameters, http://geohazards.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_search/hf_search_main.cfm ______, 2012, Map Locator & Downloader, http://store.usgs.gov/b2c_usgs/usgs/maplocator ______, 2013, U.S. Seismic Design Maps, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php APPENDIX B BORING LOGS @Surface: 5 inches asphalt @0.4': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, loose, fine sand @5': Silty SAND to SAND, olive brown, moist, loose Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@6': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand, friable @10': fine to medium sand @12.5': fine to coarse sand, trace fine and coarse gravel @15': SILT, olive brown, very moist, soft @15.4': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine tomedium sand, trace coarse sand, fine gravel @17.5': fine sand, fine and coarse subangular gravel @20': fine to medium sand, no gravel @23.75': SILT, olive brown, moist, firm @25': SAND, light brown, moist, dense, fine to medium sand,few coarse sand, few fine and coarse gravel 2 4 2 3 SM SP/SM SP MLSP ML SP S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 22 3 2 3 3 345 4 4 6 4 3 4 576 7 6 7 5 8 10 653 710 14 8 9 14 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 So i l C l a s s . 7-22-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-1 Logged By Date Drilled 140 135 130 125 120 115 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @30': dense, fine to medium sand @32.5': medium dense, fine to coarse sand @35': fine sand, trace medium sand @37.5': SILT, olive brown, moist, stiff, very fine 2-inch layer ofvery fine sand @40': very stiff @42.5': SAND, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, veryfine sand @48.5': SILT, olive brown, moist, very stiff @53.75': SAND, light brown, slightly moist, dense, fine sand @57.5': trace coarse sand 3 3 15 11 ML SP ML SP S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 81516 1111 13 8 11 15 446 7 9 11 9 14 16 769 9 10 6 4 4 8 3412 1517 22 12 15 17 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 So i l C l a s s . 7-22-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-1 Logged By Date Drilled 110 105 100 95 90 85 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @60': SAND, light brown, moist, dense, fine to medium sand,few brown silt lenses @62.5': few coarse sand @65': slightly moist, fine to medium sand, few coarse sand, fewsilt lenses @67.5': SILT with Gravel, reddish brown, moist, very stiff, fineand coarse gravel @70.67': GRAVEL, dark brown to gray, slightly moist,mechanically broken and moderately to severely weathered,trace oxide stains Notes:Total Depth: 71.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingBoring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SP ML GP S-24 S-25 S-26 S-27 S-28 111930 1517 25 13 17 19 799 24 30 33 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 So i l C l a s s . 7-22-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 3 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-1 Logged By Date Drilled 80 75 70 65 60 55 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface 3.5 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumented (Afu)@0.4': SAND, light brown, moist, fine to medium sand, fewcoarse sand @2.5': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, loose Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@3.5': SAND, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand, loose @7.5': few medium sand @10': medium dense, fine sand @17.5': fine to medium sand @22.5': trace medium to coarse sand @28.5': 3-inch layer of silty sand, light brown, fine sand 3 4 SP SM SP S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 34 6 3 4 4 346 5 6 6 5 6 9 556 4 7 9 5 6 10 577 34 8 5 9 14 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-2 Logged By Date Drilled 140 135 130 125 120 115 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @30': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand, tracesilt @35': fine to coarse sand, trace fine subangular gravel @37.5': fine sand, faintly laminated @40': SILT, light brown, moist, very stiff, trace fine sand @40.5': SAND, yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, finesand @42.5': fine sand grades to very fine sand with depth @43.75': SILT, olive brown, slightly moist, very stiff @45': very moist, stiff, trace very fine sand, few oxide stains @47.5': moist, few very fine sand @50': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand @52.5': SAND, light brown, moist, dense, fine sand, trace silt @57.5': fine to medium sand, trace gravel 3 12 SP ML SP ML SM SP S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 71010 610 14 7 8 10 71210 7 9 12 9 8 8 345 4 4 8 6 8 10 111721 1218 18 12 18 24 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-2 Logged By Date Drilled 110 105 100 95 90 85 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @60': SAND, light brown, moist to very moist, dense, fine tomedium sand, trace fine rounded gravel @62.5': Sandy CLAY with Gravel, reddish brown, moist, verystiff, fine to medium sand, fine angular gravel @65': Clayey GRAVEL, grayish brown, moist, very dense,coarse mechanically broken gravel @67.5': Sandy Clayey GRAVEL, reddish brown, moist, verydense, mechanically broken angular gravel @70': Sandy GRAVEL with Clay, reddish brown, moist, verydense, fine to coarse sand, coarse mechanically brokengravel Notes:Total Depth: 71.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingBoring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SP CL GC GP/GC GP S-24 S-25 S-26 S-27 S-28 152120 76 11 26 33 25 234040 24 40 45 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 3 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-2 Logged By Date Drilled 80 75 70 65 60 55 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface: 4.5 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumentedSilty SAND to SAND, reddish brown, moist, fine to medium sand Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@5': SAND, yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, fine tomedium sand @10': light brown, fine sand, trace medium sand, friable @15': dense, trace fine gravel @20': brown, medium dense, fine sand @25': light brown, dense 2 3 SM SP BB-1 R-1 S-1 R-2 S-2 R-3 7 14 20 7 6 6 151826 7 8 11 1221 40 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 120 115 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @30': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand @35': brown, dense, fine to coarse sand @40': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand @40.5': SAND, light brown, slighly moist, medium dense, finesand @45': Silty SAND to Sandy SILT, olive brown, slightly moist,very stiff/medium dense, very fine sand, few oxide stains @50': Silty SAND, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense,very fine sand @55': SILT, light brown, slightly moist, hard, oxide stains @56.5': Gravelly CLAY, reddish brown, moist, fine and coarsegravel 4 9 SP SM SP SM/ML SM ML CL S-3 R-4 S-4 R-5 S-5 R-6 8911 13 19 25 7 10 16 131117 7 10 11 1525 27 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @60': Gravelly SAND to Gravelly CLAY, reddish brown, moist,medium dense/stiff, fine to coarse sand, fine and coarsegravel @65': Sandy GRAVEL to Gravelly SAND, reddish brown, verymoist, very dense, fine to coarse sand, fine and coarsegravel, trace clay @70': Sandy GRAVEL, reddish brown, moist, very dense, fine tocoarse sand, fine and coarse gravel Notes:Total Depth: 71.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingBoring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/21/15 SP/CL SP/GP GP S-6 R-7 S-7 16910 30 50/5" 21 37 45 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 3 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface: 3.5 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumented (Afu)@0.3': Clayey SAND, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand, tracefine gravel @2.5': becomes reddish brown Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@4': SAND, brown, moist, fine to medium sand @5': light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, very fine sand @10': No recovery @11.5': dry, loose, fine to medium sand, trace angular gravel Notes:Total Depth: 13 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingTemporary percolation well installed 7/21/15Well screen: 5-10 feet bgsWell annulus: 3/4 inch gravel 5-13 feet bgsPercolation well removed 7/22/15Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SC SP BB-1 R-1 R-2 S-1 7 10 13 5 9 11 435 147' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 1 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-1 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface: 4 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumented@0.4': SAND, light brown, slightly moist to moist, fine sand,trace fine gravel @4.5': Quaternary Alluvium (Qal) @5': SAND, brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand, tracemedium sand, trace silt @10': light brown, fine to medium sand, friable @15': fine to medium sand, becomes finer with depth @20': dense, fine to medium sand, few gravel with depth SP SP BB-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 3 5 10 7 8 16 11 14 20 1728 31 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 2 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-2 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 120 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @4.5': Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@25': fine sand, few medium sand Notes:Total Depth: 26.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingTemporary percolation well installed 7/21/15Well screen: 20-25 feet bgsWell annulus: 3/4 inch gravel 20-26.5 feet bgsPercolation well removed 7/22/15Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 R-5 121821 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 25 30 35 40 45 50 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 2 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-2 Logged By Date Drilled 120 115 110 105 100 95 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Artificial Fill, undocumented (Afu)@Surface: Silty SAND to Sandy SILT, yellowish brown, slightlymoist, fine sand @4': SAND, brown, moist, fine to medium sand, few coarsesand, trace fine gravel @5': no recovery @9': Quaternary Alluvium (Qal) @10': SAND, light brown, dry to slightly moist, dense, fine tomedium sand, few coarse sand, fine gravel Notes:Total Depth: 16.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingTemporary percolation well installed 7/21/15Well screen: 10-15 feet bgsWell annulus: 3/4 inch gravel 10-16.5 feet bgsPercolation well removed 7/22/15Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SM/ML SP SP BB-1 R-1 R-2 4 6 8 9 15 23 15 16 24 148' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 1 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-3 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH APPENDIX C RESULTS OF GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING LP - 3 BB - 1 5- 1 0 Bu l k 36 8 9 . 8 23 0 . 1 34 5 9 . 7 37 . 9 0. 0 37 . 9 61 3 . 5 11 1 . 6 50 1 . 9 B 59 3 . 2 11 1 . 6 48 1 . 6 98 . 9 1. 1 4. 0 Pr o j e c t N a m e : JP I – G e n e A u t r y Pr o j e c t N o . : 11 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 Cl i e n t N a m e : JP I R e a l E s t a t e A c q u i s i t i o n , L L C Te s t e d B y : A. S a n t o s Date:07/31/15 % P a s s i n g N o . 4 S i e v e To t a l S a m p l e D r y W e i g h t D e t e r m i n a t i o n Dr y W e i g h t o f S a m p l e + C o n t . ( g ) We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) We i g h t o f D r y S a m p l e ( g ) Sa m p l e D r y W e i g h t D e t e r m i n a t i o n , R e t a i n e d o n S i e v e # 4 Sa m p l e D r y W e i g h t D e t e r m i n a t i o n , P a s s i n g S i e v e # 4 We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) Bo r i n g N o . Sa m p l e N o . De p t h ( f t . ) Sa m p l e T y p e PE R C E N T P A S S I N G No . 2 0 0 S I E V E AS T M D 1 1 4 0 Dr y W e i g h t o f S a m p l e + C o n t . ( g ) Me t h o d ( A o r B ) We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) We i g h t o f D r y S a m p l e ( g ) % P a s s i n g N o . 2 0 0 S i e v e Af t e r W a s h We i g h t o f D r y S a m p l e ( g ) Dr y W e i g h t o f S a m p l e + C o n t . ( g ) % R e t a i n e d N o . 4 S i e v e Li g h t o l i v e br o w n p o o r l y - gr a d e d s a n d (S P ) We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) Dr y W e i g h t o f S o i l ( g ) So i l I d e n t i f i c a t i o n Dr y W e i g h t o f S o i l + C o n t a i n e r ( g ) No M o i s t u r e C o r r e c t i o n ; A S T M D 1 1 4 0 m o d i f i e d t o i n c l u d e s p l i t t i n g t h e s a m p l e o n t h e # 4 s i e v e -200 LP-3, BB-1 @ 5-10 Project Name: Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:Depth (ft.): Sample No.: Sample Type:Ring Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 161.78 44.10 0.9668 157.53 152.10 38.62 4.8 93.4 16 0.3397 364.31 338.48 182.49 23.09 96.3 83 0.3031 2.70 62.43 0.10 0.3394 0.9997 0.00 0.03 0.804 0.03 0.20 0.3383 0.9986 0.01 0.14 0.802 0.13 0.40 0.3360 0.9963 0.10 0.37 0.800 0.27 0.80 0.3329 0.9932 0.22 0.68 0.796 0.46 0.40 0.3336 0.9939 0.10 0.61 0.795 0.51 0.20 0.3341 0.9944 0.01 0.56 0.795 0.55 0.40 0.3334 0.9937 0.10 0.64 0.795 0.54 0.80 0.3317 0.9920 0.22 0.81 0.794 0.59 0.80 0.3295 0.9898 0.22 1.02 0.790 0.80 1.60 0.3228 0.9831 0.39 1.69 0.781 1.30 3.20 0.3119 0.9722 0.59 2.78 0.765 2.19 6.40 0.3003 0.9606 0.81 3.94 0.748 3.13 12.80 0.2864 0.9467 1.07 5.34 0.728 4.27 3.20 0.2909 0.9512 0.76 4.89 0.730 4.13 0.80 0.2971 0.9574 0.52 4.26 0.737 3.74 0.20 0.3031 0.9634 0.34 3.66 0.745 3.32 Pressure (p) (ksf) Final Reading (in.) Apparent Thickness (in.) Load Compliance (%) Deformation % of Sample Thickness Void Ratio Corrected Deforma- tion (%) No Time Readings Date Time Elapsed Time (min) Square Root of Time Dial Rdgs. (in.) Sample Diameter (in.) Sample Thickness (in.) Wt. of Sample + Ring (g) Weight of Ring (g) After Test Height after consol. (in.) Wt.Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt.of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Before Test Initial Moisture Content (%) Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Saturation (%) Initial Vertical Reading (in.) Wt.of Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt. of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Final Moisture Content (%) Water Density (pcf) Final Dry Density (pcf) Final Saturation (%) Final Vertical Reading (in.) Specific Gravity (assumed) JPI – Gene Autry ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 Olive brown silty sand (SM) 5.0 R-1 11091.001 LP-1 0.720 0.730 0.740 0.750 0.760 0.770 0.780 0.790 0.800 0.810 0.10 1.00 10.00 100. Vo i d R a t i o Pressure, p (ksf) Inundate with Tap water Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final No Time Readings 0.745 16 8393.4 Degree of Saturation (%)Dry Density (pcf) 0.805 Void Ratio 5.0 4.8 Soil Identification: Olive brown silty sand (SM) Project No.: JPI – Gene Autry 08-15 11091.001 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft.) Moisture Content (%) ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 23.1 96.3LP-1 R-1 0.2920 0.3420 0.3920 0.4420 0.4920 0.5420 0.5920 0.1 1.0 De f o r m a t i o n D i a l R e a d i n g ( i n . ) Log of Time (min.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.500.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 De f o r m a t i o n ( % ) Pressure, p (ksf) 0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 0.3500 0.4000 0.4500 0.5000 0.5500 0.0 10.0 Square Root of Time (min.1/2) Inundate with Tap water Project Name: Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:Depth (ft.): Sample No.: Sample Type:Ring Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 168.12 42.41 0.9776 192.41 189.26 50.55 2.3 102.2 9 0.3344 370.24 348.83 184.63 17.58 103.6 76 0.3104 2.70 62.43 0.10 0.3341 0.9997 0.00 0.03 0.648 0.03 0.20 0.3333 0.9989 0.05 0.11 0.648 0.06 0.40 0.3318 0.9974 0.11 0.26 0.646 0.15 0.80 0.3299 0.9955 0.18 0.46 0.644 0.28 0.40 0.3304 0.9960 0.11 0.41 0.644 0.30 0.20 0.3309 0.9965 0.05 0.35 0.644 0.30 0.40 0.3302 0.9958 0.11 0.42 0.644 0.31 0.80 0.3292 0.9948 0.18 0.52 0.643 0.34 0.80 0.3285 0.9941 0.18 0.59 0.642 0.41 1.60 0.3247 0.9903 0.27 0.97 0.637 0.70 3.20 0.3182 0.9838 0.38 1.62 0.628 1.24 6.40 0.3108 0.9764 0.53 2.36 0.619 1.83 12.80 0.3007 0.9663 0.76 3.37 0.606 2.61 3.20 0.3043 0.9699 0.44 3.01 0.607 2.57 0.80 0.3076 0.9732 0.29 2.68 0.609 2.39 0.20 0.3104 0.9760 0.16 2.40 0.612 2.24 Pressure (p) (ksf) Final Reading (in.) Apparent Thickness (in.) Load Compliance (%) Deformation % of Sample Thickness Void Ratio Corrected Deforma- tion (%) No Time Readings Date Time Elapsed Time (min) Square Root of Time Dial Rdgs. (in.) Sample Diameter (in.) Sample Thickness (in.) Wt. of Sample + Ring (g) Weight of Ring (g) After Test Height after consol. (in.) Wt.Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt.of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Before Test Initial Moisture Content (%) Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Saturation (%) Initial Vertical Reading (in.) Wt.of Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt. of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Final Moisture Content (%) Water Density (pcf) Final Dry Density (pcf) Final Saturation (%) Final Vertical Reading (in.) Specific Gravity (assumed) JPI – Gene Autry ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) 10.0 R-2 11091.001 LP-2 0.600 0.610 0.620 0.630 0.640 0.650 0.660 0.10 1.00 10.00 100. Vo i d R a t i o Pressure, p (ksf) Inundate with Tap water Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final No Time Readings 0.612 9 76102.2 Degree of Saturation (%)Dry Density (pcf) 0.649 Void Ratio 10.0 2.3 Soil Identification: Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Project No.: JPI – Gene Autry 08-15 11091.001 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft.) Moisture Content (%) ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 17.6 103.6LP-2 R-2 0.2920 0.3420 0.3920 0.4420 0.4920 0.5420 0.5920 0.1 1.0 De f o r m a t i o n D i a l R e a d i n g ( i n . ) Log of Time (min.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.000.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 De f o r m a t i o n ( % ) Pressure, p (ksf) 0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 0.3500 0.4000 0.4500 0.5000 0.5500 0.0 10.0 Square Root of Time (min.1/2) Inundate with Tap water Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By :G. Berdy Date:07/28/15 Project No. :11091.001 Data Input By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.LP-3 LB-3 Sample No.BB-1 BB-1 Sample Depth (ft)5-10 0-5 253.02 270.05 251.00 265.21 57.98 65.19 1.05 2.42 100.79 100.81 60 62 51 850 850 11:20/11:55 11:20/11:55 35 35 21.7569 20.2983 21.7546 20.2952 0.0023 0.0031 94.65 127.56 96 131 ml of Extract For Titration (B)30 30 ml of AgNO3 Soln. Used in Titration (C)0.5 0.5 PPM of Chloride (C -0.2) * 100 * 30 / B 30 30 PPM of Chloride, Dry Wt. Basis 30 31 7.50 8.02 20.7 20.8 TESTS for SULFATE CONTENT CHLORIDE CONTENT and pH of SOILS SULFATE CONTENT, DOT California Test 417, Part II Soil Identification: Moisture Content (%) Temperature °C pH Value Olive silty sand (SM) pH TEST, DOT California Test 643 CHLORIDE CONTENT, DOT California Test 422 Time In / Time Out Weight of Soaked Soil (g) Light olive brown SP Wt. of Crucible + Residue (g) Wet Weight of Soil + Container (g) Dry Weight of Soil + Container (g) Weight of Container (g) Duration of Combustion (min) Beaker No. Crucible No. Furnace Temperature (°C) PPM of Sulfate (A) x 41150 PPM of Sulfate, Dry Weight Basis Wt. of Crucible (g) Wt. of Residue (g) (A) Project Name: Tested By : G. Berdy Date: Project No. : Data Input By: J. Ward Date: Boring No.: Depth (ft.) : Sample No. : Dry Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) 7800 Soil Identification:* *California Test 643 requires soil specimens to consist only of portions of samples passing through the No. 8 US Standard Sieve before resistivity testing. Therefore, this test method may not be representative for coarser materials. Wt. of Container (g)16.58 7800 1.05 253.02 Moisture Content (%) (MCi) Wet Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g)Specimen No. 1 2 Water Added (ml) (Wa) 20 Adjusted Moisture Content (MC) DOT CA Test 643 1.000 Chloride Content (ohm-cm) Moisture Content Sulfate Content 5 Min. Resistivity DOT CA Test 643DOT CA Test 417 Part II DOT CA Test 422 (%) (ppm) (ppm) 4 30 40 130.103560032.11 5500 5350 26.8 96 30 7.50 20.7 SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST DOT CA TEST 643 Temp. (°C)pH Soil pH 5500 5600 251.00 57.98 MC =(((1+Mci/100)x(Wa/Wt+1))-1)x100 JPI – Gene Autry 07/29/15 08/08/15 5-10 11091.001 LP-3 BB-1 Container No. Initial Soil Wt. (g) (Wt) Box Constant Light olive brown SP Resistance Reading (ohm) 24.35 Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 So i l R e s i s t i v i t y ( o h m - c m ) Moisture Content (%) Project Name: Tested By : G. Berdy Date: Project No. : Data Input By: J. Ward Date: Boring No.: Depth (ft.) : Sample No. : BB-1 Moisture Content (%) (MCi) Wet Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) 20 Soil Identification:* Dry Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) Wt. of Container (g) *California Test 643 requires soil specimens to consist only of portions of samples passing through the No. 8 US Standard Sieve before resistivity testing. Therefore, this test method may not be representative for coarser materials. 2.42 JPI – Gene Autry 07/28/15 08/08/15 0-5 11091.001 LB-3 270.05 265.21 65.19 20.8 Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) Box Constant SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST DOT CA TEST 643 Temp. (°C)pH Soil pH 1.000 130.00 3150 3200 3125 28.5 131 31 8.02 DOT CA Test 643DOT CA Test 417 Part II DOT CA Test 422DOT CA Test 643 Specimen No. 1 2 3 350018.18 3500 Resistance Reading (ohm) Adjusted Moisture Content (MC) Water Added (ml) (Wa) Initial Soil Wt. (g) (Wt) 5 3200 3500 Container No.315026.06 MC =(((1+Mci/100)x(Wa/Wt+1))-1)x100 4 Sulfate Content Chloride Content (ohm-cm) (%) (ppm) (ppm) Min. Resistivity Moisture Content Olive silty sand (SM) 3500 30 40 50 33.93 41.81 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 So i l R e s i s t i v i t y ( o h m - c m ) Moisture Content (%) Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/02/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.: Depth (ft.):35.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 174.62 42.27 Before Shearing 175.42 170.08 37.66 0.0000 -0.0169 After Shearing 178.72 158.73 39.27 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-4 LB-3 Olive brown poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-4 @ 35 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 R-4 35 Soil Identification:4.03 105.8 1.000 2.415 4.200 3.694 2.685 0.0500 18.4 0.9831 16.7 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 08-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Olive brown poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-4 @ 35 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/02/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.: Depth (ft.):55.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 186.25 43.84 Before Shearing 199.98 179.54 37.76 0.2782 0.3004 After Shearing 198.17 174.35 52.74 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-6 LB-3 Olive brown silt with sand (ML)s Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-6 @ 55 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 R-6 55 Soil Identification:14.42 103.5 1.000 2.415 6.600 5.596 4.467 0.0500 61.9 0.9778 19.6 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 08-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Olive brown silt with sand (ML)s 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-6 @ 55 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.: Depth (ft.):5.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 185.75 44.73 Before Shearing 184.15 176.28 38.02 0.0000 -0.0046 After Shearing 184.73 166.55 37.71 2.70 62.43Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-1 LP-2 Olive brown silty sand (SM) Sample Diameter(in): DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-1 @ 5 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) 07-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Olive brown silty sand (SM) 29.6 0.9954 14.1 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 1.000 2.415 0.600 0.692 0.494 0.0500 Soil Identification:5.69 111.0 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-2 R-1 5 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-1 @ 5 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.: Depth (ft.):20.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 180.73 43.75 Before Shearing 177.15 174.06 37.35 0.2459 0.2585 After Shearing 186.79 168.53 39.09 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-4 LP-2 Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-4 @ 20 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-2 R-4 20 Soil Identification:2.26 111.4 1.000 2.415 2.400 2.864 1.817 0.0500 11.9 0.9874 14.1 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 07-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light yellowish brown poorly- graded sand (SP) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-4 @ 20 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.: Depth (ft.):25.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 168.72 42.83 Before Shearing 181.31 177.70 53.71 0.2401 0.2533 After Shearing 182.06 157.61 39.52 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-5 LP-2 Light olive brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-5 @ 25 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-2 R-5 25 Soil Identification:2.91 101.7 1.000 2.415 3.000 2.773 1.987 0.0500 12.0 0.9868 20.7 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 07-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light olive brown poorly- graded sand (SP) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-5 @ 25 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.: Depth (ft.):10.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 158.40 43.90 Before Shearing 219.96 218.09 65.23 0.2460 0.2577 After Shearing 187.93 161.01 52.75 2.70 62.43Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-1 LP-3 Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-1 @ 10 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) 07-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light yellowish brown poorly- graded sand (SP)4.2 0.9883 24.9 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 1.000 2.415 1.200 1.063 0.783 0.0500 Soil Identification:1.22 94.1 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-3 R-1 10 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-1 @ 10 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.: Depth (ft.):15.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 176.43 41.88 Before Shearing 214.76 211.78 65.79 0.0000 -0.0167 After Shearing 198.90 178.58 53.84 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-2 LP-3 Light olive brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-2 @ 15 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-3 R-2 15 Soil Identification:2.04 109.7 1.000 2.415 1.800 1.855 1.320 0.0500 10.3 0.9833 16.3 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 07-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light olive brown poorly- graded sand (SP) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-2 @ 15 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/03/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Boring No.: Sample Type:93% Remold Sample No.: Depth (ft.):0-5 Soil Identification: 2.415 2.415 2.415 1.000 1.000 1.000 200.31 200.29 199.79 43.62 43.51 43.09 Before Shearing 249.51 249.51 249.51 233.50 233.50 233.50 38.71 38.71 38.71 0.2405 0.0000 0.2666 0.2460 -0.0083 0.2886 After Shearing 200.04 199.57 199.39 181.03 180.90 181.36 38.07 37.50 37.77 2.70 2.70 2.70 62.43 62.43 62.43 Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): BB-1 LB-3 Olive silty sand (SM) DS LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) 120.4 1.000 2.415 8.22 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 BB-1 0-5 55.6 0.9917 13.0 Soil Identification:8.22 120.5 8.22 120.4 1.742 0.0500 4.000 3.219 2.899 0.0500 1.000 1.254 0.915 0.0500 1.000 2.415 1.000 2.415 2.000 2.223 55.5 0.9945 13.3 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 55.5 0.9780 12.6 08-15 Project No.: 11091.001 Sample Type: 93% Remold Olive silty sand (SM) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Sample Type: 93% Remold Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Strength Parameters Dry Density (pcf) C (psf) (o)Saturation (%) Peak 756.0 32.3 Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Ultimate 336.5 33.0 Final Moisture Content (%) 08-15 Project No.: 11091.001 55.5 0.9945 1.000 13.3 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 1.000 1.254 0.915 0.0500 8.22 120.4 2.415 Soil Identification: 0.9780 8.22 12.6 1.000 2.415 0.9917 13.0 120.4 1.000 2.415 55.6 8.22 120.5 0.0500 4.000 3.219 2.899 0.0500 55.5 2.000 Olive silty sand (SM) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 BB-1 0-5 2.223 1.742 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Tested By:O. Figueroa Date:07/31/15 Input By: J. Ward Date:08/03/15 Depth (ft.):0-5 X Moist Rammer Weight (lb.) =10.0 Dry #3/4 Height of Drop (in.) =18.0 X #3/8 #4 6.9 0.03340 123456 3858 3969 3975 1861 1861 1861 1997 2108 2114 416.5 429.0 438.7 396.8 401.1 401.2 51.3 53.3 54.0 5.70 8.02 10.80 131.8 139.1 139.5 124.7 128.8 125.9 129.0 8.5 131.0 8.0 X Procedure A Soil Passing No. 4 (4.75 mm) Sieve Mold : 4 in. (101.6 mm) diameter Layers : 5 (Five) Blows per layer : 25 (twenty-five) May be used if +#4 is 20% or less Procedure B Soil Passing 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) Sieve Mold : 4 in. (101.6 mm) diameter Layers : 5 (Five) Blows per layer : 25 (twenty-five) Use if +#4 is >20% and +3/8 in. is 20% or less Procedure C Soil Passing 3/4 in. (19.0 mm) Sieve Mold : 6 in. (152.4 mm) diameter Layers : 5 (Five) Blows per layer : 56 (fifty-six) Use if +3/8 in. is >20% and +¾ in. is <30% Particle-Size Distribution:7:63:30GR:SA:FIAtterberg Limits: LL,PL,PI Corrected Dry Density (pcf) Preparation Method: Dry Density (pcf) Mechanical Ram Net Weight of Soil (g) Wet Density (pcf) Moisture Content (%) Wet Weight of Soil + Cont. (g) Project No.: Boring No.: Sample No.: Olive silty sand (SM) Scalp Fraction (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) Note: Corrected dry density calculation assumes specific gravity of 2.70 and moisture content of 1.0% for oversize particles Optimum Moisture Content (%) Corrected Moisture Content (%) Mold Volume (ft³) TEST NO. Weight of Container (g) Manual Ram Dry Weight of Soil + Cont. (g) Compaction Method MODIFIED PROCTOR COMPACTION TEST ASTM D 1557 Weight of Mold (g) JPI – Gene Autry LB-3 Wt. Compacted Soil + Mold (g) BB-1 Soil Identification: 11091.001 Project Name: 110.0 115.0 120.0 125.0 130.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20 Dr y D e n s i t y ( p c f ) Moisture Content (%) SP. GR. = 2.65 SP. GR. = 2.70 SP. GR. = 2.75 MX LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Project Name: Tested By:A. Santos Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LB-3 Depth (feet):0-5 Sample No.:BB-1 Soil Identification:Olive silty sand (SM) Whole Sample Sample Passing #4 Whole Sample Sample passing #4 ES-2 4-C Wt. of Air-Dry Soil + Cont.(g) 0.00 0.00 2340.2 616.4 Wt. of Dry Soil + Cont. (g) 0.00 0.00 230.6 109.1 Wt. of Container No._____(g) 1.00 1.00 2109.6 507.3 Moisture Content (%) 0.00 0.00 4-C 451.7 109.1 342.6 (mm.) 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #8 #16 #30 #50 #100 #200 GRAVEL:7% SAND:63 % FINES:30 % GROUP SYMBOL:SM Remarks: 282.4 5.3 145.0 0.150 0.075 23.7 341.7 130.8 PAN 4.75 2.36 1.18 0.600 56.6 214.3 0.0 0.300 15.1 9.5 19.0 Wt. of Dry Soil + Container (g) Wt. of Container (g) 41.3 12.5 Whole Sample 82.7 69.1 Wt. Air-Dried Soil + Cont.(g) 93.1 90.3 30.4 100.0 99.7 Sample Passing #4 Passing #4 Material After Wet Sieve PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION (GRADATION) ASTM D 6913 Container No.: JPI – Gene Autry Moisture ContentsCalculation of Dry Weights of SOILS USING SIEVE ANALYSIS 53.8 Wt. of Container (g) Percent Passing (%) Cu = D60/D10 = Cc = (D30)²/(D60*D10) = Dry Wt. of Soil Retained on # 200 Sieve (g) Container No. Dry Wt. of Soil (g) 98.9 Cumulative Weight of Dry Soil Retained (g)U. S. Sieve Size 25.0 Pr o j e c t N a m e : 7 : 6 3 : 3 0 BB - 1 08/08/15 Bo r i n g N o . : De p t h ( f e e t ) : 0 - 5 So i l T y p e : P A R T I C L E - S I Z E DI S T R I B U T I O N AS T M D 6 9 1 3 So i l I d e n t i f i c a t i o n : Ol i v e s i l t y s a n d ( S M ) SM GR : S A : F I : ( % ) JP I – G e n e A u t r y Pr o j e c t N o . : LB - 3 Sa m p l e N o . : 11 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 SA N D SI L T F I N E HY D R O M E T E R 3 . 0 " 1 1 / 2 " 3 / 4 " 3 / 8 " # 4 # 8 # 1 6 # 3 0 # 5 0 # 1 0 0 # 2 0 0 U. S . S T A N D A R D S I E V E O P E N I N G U . S . S T A N D A R D S I E V E N U M B E R GR A V E L FI N E S FI N E CLAY C O A R S E C O A R S E M E D I U M 0102030405060708090 10 0 0.001 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 0 0 1. 0 0 0 10 . 0 0 0 10 0 . 0 0 0 P E R C E N T F I N E R B Y W E I G H T PA R T I C L E - S I Z E ( m m ) " SA LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Pr o j e c t N a m e : Te s t e d B y : A. S a n t o s Date:07/31/15 Pr o j e c t N o . : In p u t B y : J. W a r d Date:08/08/15 12 : 5 5 13 : 0 5 1 3 : 0 7 1 3 : 2 7 5. 7 4 . 1 72 12 : 5 9 1 3 : 0 9 1 3 : 1 1 1 3 : 3 1 6. 0 4 . 2 70 13 : 0 3 1 3 : 1 3 1 3 : 1 5 1 3 : 3 5 6. 0 4 . 3 72 T1 = S t a r t i n g T i m e T 3 = S e t t l e m e n t S t a r t i n g T i m e S a n d E q u i v a l e n t = R 2 / R 1 * 1 0 0 T2 = ( T 1 + 1 0 m i n ) B e g i n A g i t a t i o n T 4 = ( T 3 + 2 0 m i n ) T a ke C l a y R e a d i n g ( R 1 ) R e c o r d S E a s N e x t H i g h e r I n t e g e r (1 3 1 c y c l e s i n 4 5 s e c ) a n d S a n d R e a d i n g ( R 2 ) T2 T 3 So i l T y p e SE R1 R 2 T1 A vera g e SE Li g h t o l i v e b r o w n p o o r l y - gr a d e d s a n d ( S P ) BB - 1 5 - 1 0 LP - 3 SA N D E Q U I V A L E N T T E S T DO T C A T e s t 2 1 7 Bo r i n g N o . S a m p l e N o . D e p t h ( f t . ) 72 JP I – G e n e A u t r y 11 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 T4 SE LP-3, BB-1 @ 5-10 Project Name: Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/04/15 Project No.: Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LB-3 Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:R-3 Depth (ft.)25.0 Sample Description:Olive brown poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM) Initial Dry Density (pcf): 110.1 Final Dry Density (pcf): 111.1 Initial Moisture (%): 3.76 Final Moisture (%) : 15.2 Initial Length (in.): 1.0000 Initial Void Ratio: 0.5308 Initial Dial Reading: 0.3033 Specific Gravity(assumed): 2.70 Diameter(in): 2.415 Initial Saturation (%) 19.1 0.100 0.9999 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 3.000 0.9870 0.55 -1.30 -0.75 H2O 0.9852 0.55 -1.48 -0.93 Percent Swell (+) / Settlement (-) After Inundation =-0.18 0.5166 0.3032 0.2903 0.2885 Pressure (p) (ksf) 0.5307 0.5193 Final Reading (in)Void Ratio Swell (+) Settlement (-) % of Sample Thickness Load Compliance (%) Apparent Thickness (in) ONE-DIMENSIONAL SWELL OR SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF COHESIVE SOILS ASTM D 4546 Corrected Deformation (%) JPI – Gene Autry 11091.001 0.5140 0.5160 0.5180 0.5200 0.5220 0.5240 0.5260 0.5280 0.5300 0.5320 0.100 1.000 10.000 Vo i d R a t i o Log Pressure (ksf) Void Ratio - Log Pressure Curve Inundate withTap water Swell-Settlement LB-3, R-3 @ 25 Project Name: Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/04/15 Project No.: Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LP-2 Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:R-3 Depth (ft.)15.0 Sample Description:Light olive brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Initial Dry Density (pcf): 100.8 Final Dry Density (pcf): 101.5 Initial Moisture (%): 3.72 Final Moisture (%) : 17.6 Initial Length (in.): 1.0000 Initial Void Ratio: 0.6722 Initial Dial Reading: 0.2920 Specific Gravity(assumed): 2.70 Diameter(in): 2.415 Initial Saturation (%) 15.0 0.100 0.9998 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 1.500 0.9911 0.39 -0.89 -0.50 H2O 0.9891 0.39 -1.09 -0.70 Percent Swell (+) / Settlement (-) After Inundation =-0.20 0.6605 0.2918 0.2831 0.2811 Pressure (p) (ksf) 0.6719 0.6638 Final Reading (in)Void Ratio Swell (+) Settlement (-) % of Sample Thickness Load Compliance (%) Apparent Thickness (in) ONE-DIMENSIONAL SWELL OR SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF COHESIVE SOILS ASTM D 4546 Corrected Deformation (%) JPI – Gene Autry 11091.001 0.6580 0.6600 0.6620 0.6640 0.6660 0.6680 0.6700 0.6720 0.6740 0.100 1.000 10.000 Vo i d R a t i o Log Pressure (ksf) Void Ratio - Log Pressure Curve Inundate with Tap water Swell-Settlement LP-2, R-3 @ 15 Project Name: Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/30/15 Project No.: Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LP-2 Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:R-4 Depth (ft.)20.0 Sample Description:Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Initial Dry Density (pcf): 105.0 Final Dry Density (pcf): 106.1 Initial Moisture (%): 2.26 Final Moisture (%) : 15.5 Initial Length (in.): 1.0000 Initial Void Ratio: 0.6049 Initial Dial Reading: 0.2741 Specific Gravity(assumed): 2.70 Diameter(in): 2.415 Initial Saturation (%) 10.1 0.100 0.9997 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 2.400 0.9879 0.40 -1.21 -0.81 H2O 0.9856 0.40 -1.44 -1.04 Percent Swell (+) / Settlement (-) After Inundation =-0.23 0.5882 0.2738 0.2620 0.2597 Pressure (p) (ksf) 0.6045 0.5919 Final Reading (in)Void Ratio Swell (+) Settlement (-) % of Sample Thickness Load Compliance (%) Apparent Thickness (in) ONE-DIMENSIONAL SWELL OR SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF COHESIVE SOILS ASTM D 4546 Corrected Deformation (%) JPI – Gene Autry 11091.001 0.5860 0.5880 0.5900 0.5920 0.5940 0.5960 0.5980 0.6000 0.6020 0.6040 0.6060 0.100 1.000 10.000 Vo i d R a t i o Log Pressure (ksf) Void Ratio - Log Pressure Curve Inundate withTap water Swell-Settlement LP-2, R-4 @ 20 APPENDIX D PERCOLATION DATA RESULTS Earth Description: Quaternary alluvium (Qal)Date Tested: 7/22/15 Liquid Description: tap water Depth of boring (ft):10 Diameter of boring (in):8 Time Interval Standard Diameter of casing (in):2 Start Time for Pre-Soak:7/21/2015 14:04 Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard:7/22/2015 11:29 Depth to Initial Water Depth (ft): 5.10 10 min Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 10 min Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 11:29 5.10 58.8 11:39 7.42 31.0 11:38 5.12 58.6 11:48 7.12 34.6 11:50 5.15 58.2 12:00 7.20 33.6 12:02 5.13 58.4 12:13 7.32 32.2 12:14 5.12 58.6 12:24 7.15 34.2 12:26 5.13 58.4 12:36 7.13 34.4 Infiltration Rate, I (Average of Last 3 Readings) =2.36 in./hr. Flow Volume =Volume Inside of Pipe (V1) + Volume in Annular Space (V2) V1 =π(rcasing)2Δd V2 =nπ[(rboring)2-(rcasing)2]Δd Flow Area =2π(rboring)Haverage+π(rboring)2 Haverage =(Ho+Hf)/2 Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet Project Number: 11091.001 Test Hole Number: LP-1 Project Name: Jefferson Stadium Park Date Excavated: 7/21/15 Tested By: CD Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data 1 10 27.8 0.36 2.78 2 10 24.0 0.42 2.32 3 10 24.6 0.41 2.41 2.32 4 11 26.3 0.42 2.37 5 10 24.4 0.41 2.36 Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 6 10 24.0 0.42 Earth Description: Quaternary alluvium (Qal)Date Tested: 7/22/15 Liquid Description: tap water Depth of boring (ft):25 Diameter of boring (in):8 Time Interval Standard Diameter of casing (in):2 Start Time for Pre-Soak:7/21/2015 14:04 Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard:7/22/2015 11:57 Depth to Initial Water Depth (ft): 21.80 10 min Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 10 min Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 11:57 20.18 57.8 12:08 23.25 21.0 12:09 20.15 58.2 12:19 22.92 25.0 12:21 20.20 57.6 12:31 22.90 25.2 12:33 20.20 57.6 12:43 22.70 27.6 12:44 20.17 58.0 12:54 22.75 27.0 12:57 20.15 58.2 13:07 22.71 27.5 Infiltration Rate, I (Average of Last 3 Readings) =3.28 in./hr. Flow Volume =Volume Inside of Pipe (V1) + Volume in Annular Space (V2) V1 =π(rcasing)2Δd V2 =nπ[(rboring)2-(rcasing)2]Δd Flow Area =2π(rboring)Haverage+π(rboring)2 Haverage =(Ho+Hf)/2 Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet Project Number: 11091.001 Test Hole Number: LP-2 Project Name: Jefferson Stadium Park Date Excavated: 7/21/15 Tested By: CD Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data 11 36.8 0.301 10 33.2 0.30 3.58 3.79 10 30.0 0.33 3.15 10 32.4 0.31 3.50 10 31.0 0.32 3.26 10 30.7 0.33 3.21 Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 2 3 4 5 6 Earth Description: Quaternary alluvium (Qal)Date Tested: 7/22/15 Liquid Description: tap water Depth of boring (ft):15 Diameter of boring (in):8 Time Interval Standard Diameter of casing (in):2 Start Time for Pre-Soak:7/21/2015 13:14:00 PM Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard:7/22/2015 13:04 Depth to Initial Water Depth (ft): 10.15 10 min Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 5 min Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 13:04 10.15 58.2 13:09 14.05 11.4 13:12 10.15 58.2 13:17 13.92 13.0 13:19 10.15 58.2 13:24 13.87 13.6 13:26 10.10 58.8 13:31 13.85 13.8 13:33 10.10 58.8 13:38 13.90 13.2 13:40 10.17 58.0 13:45 13.97 12.4 Infiltration Rate, I (Average of Last 3 Readings) =11.20 in./hr. Flow Volume =Volume Inside of Pipe (V1) + Volume in Annular Space (V2) V1 =π(rcasing)2Δd V2 =nπ[(rboring)2-(rcasing)2]Δd Flow Area =2π(rboring)Haverage+π(rboring)2 Haverage =(Ho+Hf)/2 Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 5 5 45.6 0.11 11.25 6 5 45.6 0.11 11.50 4 5 45.0 0.11 11.02 3 5 44.6 0.11 11.05 11.92 2 5 45.2 0.11 11.29 Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data 1 5 46.8 0.11 Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet Project Number: 11091.001 Test Hole Number: LP-3 Project Name: Jefferson Stadium Park Date Excavated: 7/21/15 Tested By: CD APPENDIX E SEISMIC DESIGN ANALYSIS 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…1/6 From Figure 22­1 [1] From Figure 22­2 [2] Design Maps Detailed Report ASCE 7­10 Standard (33.7989°N, 117.8902°W) Site Class D – “Stiff Soil”, Risk Category I/II/III Section 11.4.1 — Mapped Acceleration Parameters Note: Ground motion values provided below are for the direction of maximum horizontal spectral response acceleration. They have been converted from corresponding geometric mean ground motions computed by the USGS by applying factors of 1.1 (to obtain SS) and 1.3 (to obtain S1). Maps in the 2010 ASCE­7 Standard are provided for Site Class B. Adjustments for other Site Classes are made, as needed, in Section 11.4.3. SS = 1.492 g S1 = 0.543 g Section 11.4.2 — Site Class The authority having jurisdiction (not the USGS), site­specific geotechnical data, and/or the default has classified the site as Site Class D, based on the site soil properties in accordance with Chapter 20. Table 20.3–1 Site Classification Site Class vS N or Nch su A. Hard Rock >5,000 ft/s N/A N/A B. Rock 2,500 to 5,000 ft/s N/A N/A C. Very dense soil and soft rock 1,200 to 2,500 ft/s >50 >2,000 psf D. Stiff Soil 600 to 1,200 ft/s 15 to 50 1,000 to 2,000 psf E. Soft clay soil <600 ft/s <15 <1,000 psf Any profile with more than 10 ft of soil having the characteristics: Plasticity index PI > 20, Moisture content w ≥ 40%, and Undrained shear strength su < 500 psf F. Soils requiring site response analysis in accordance with Section 21.1 See Section 20.3.1 For SI: 1ft/s = 0.3048 m/s 1lb/ft² = 0.0479 kN/m² 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…2/6 Section 11.4.3 — Site Coefficients and Risk–Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters Table 11.4–1: Site Coefficient Fa Site Class Mapped MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at Short Period SS ≤ 0.25 SS = 0.50 SS = 0.75 SS = 1.00 SS ≥ 1.25 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight–line interpolation for intermediate values of SS For Site Class = D and SS = 1.492 g, Fa = 1.000 Table 11.4–2: Site Coefficient Fv Site Class Mapped MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 1–s Period S1 ≤ 0.10 S1 = 0.20 S1 = 0.30 S1 = 0.40 S1 ≥ 0.50 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 D 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 E 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.4 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight–line interpolation for intermediate values of S1 For Site Class = D and S1 = 0.543 g, Fv = 1.500 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…3/6 Equation (11.4–1): Equation (11.4–2): Equation (11.4–3): Equation (11.4–4): From Figure 22­12 [3] SMS = FaSS = 1.000 x 1.492 = 1.492 g SM1 = FvS1 = 1.500 x 0.543 = 0.814 g Section 11.4.4 — Design Spectral Acceleration Parameters SDS = ⅔ SMS = ⅔ x 1.492 = 0.995 g SD1 = ⅔ SM1 = ⅔ x 0.814 = 0.543 g Section 11.4.5 — Design Response Spectrum TL = 8 seconds Figure 11.4–1: Design Response Spectrum 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…4/6 Section 11.4.6 — Risk­Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Response Spectrum The MCER Response Spectrum is determined by multiplying the design response spectrum above by 1.5. 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…5/6 From Figure 22­7 [4] Equation (11.8–1): From Figure 22­17 [5] From Figure 22­18 [6] Section 11.8.3 — Additional Geotechnical Investigation Report Requirements for Seismic Design Categories D through F PGA = 0.502 PGAM = FPGAPGA = 1.000 x 0.502 = 0.502 g Table 11.8–1: Site Coefficient FPGA Site Class Mapped MCE Geometric Mean Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA PGA ≤ 0.10 PGA = 0.20 PGA = 0.30 PGA = 0.40 PGA ≥ 0.50 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight–line interpolation for intermediate values of PGA For Site Class = D and PGA = 0.502 g, FPGA = 1.000 Section 21.2.1.1 — Method 1 (from Chapter 21 – Site­Specific Ground Motion Procedures for Seismic Design) CRS = 1.040 CR1 = 1.074 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…6/6 Section 11.6 — Seismic Design Category Table 11.6­1 Seismic Design Category Based on Short Period Response Acceleration Parameter VALUE OF SDS RISK CATEGORY I or II III IV SDS < 0.167g A A A 0.167g ≤ SDS < 0.33g B B C 0.33g ≤ SDS < 0.50g C C D 0.50g ≤ SDS D D D For Risk Category = I and SDS = 0.995 g, Seismic Design Category = D Table 11.6­2 Seismic Design Category Based on 1­S Period Response Acceleration Parameter VALUE OF SD1 RISK CATEGORY I or II III IV SD1 < 0.067g A A A 0.067g ≤ SD1 < 0.133g B B C 0.133g ≤ SD1 < 0.20g C C D 0.20g ≤ SD1 D D D For Risk Category = I and SD1 = 0.543 g, Seismic Design Category = D Note: When S1 is greater than or equal to 0.75g, the Seismic Design Category is E for buildings in Risk Categories I, II, and III, and F for those in Risk Category IV, irrespective of the above. Seismic Design Category ≡ “the more severe design category in accordance with Table 11.6­1 or 11.6­2” = D Note: See Section 11.6 for alternative approaches to calculating Seismic Design Category. References 1. Figure 22­1: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE­7_Figure_22­1.pdf 2. Figure 22­2: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE­7_Figure_22­2.pdf 3. Figure 22­12: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE­7_Figure_22­ 12.pdf 4. Figure 22­7: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE­7_Figure_22­7.pdf 5. Figure 22­17: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE­7_Figure_22­ 17.pdf 6. Figure 22­18: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE­7_Figure_22­ 18.pdf APPENDIX F RESPONSE TO REVIEW COMMENTS January 7, 2015 Project No. 11091.001 JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC 11975 El Camino Real, Suite 205 San Diego, California 92081 Attention: Ms. Rosie Cooper Subject: Response to Geotechnical Report Review Comments: Geotechnical Exploration Report Proposed Residential Development Vacant Property at the Southwest Corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Reference: Langan Engineering and Environmental Services, In., 2015, Geotechnical Review Letter, dated November 25, 2015, Langan Project No.: 700034201 This letter is written in response to the referenced review comment letter for the subject report. Leighton and Associates, Inc.’s responses to the review comments are as follows: Review Comment 1: Below grade levels and/or retaining walls are not included in Section 1.1 – Site and Project Description of the Report; however recommendations for temporary excavations 5 feet or deeper, temporary shoring, and retaining structures (including seismic design parameters for retaining structures) are provided in the Report. Clarification of the proposed development, including proposed below grade levels, if any and grading and foundation plans should be provided for our review. Response to Review Comment 1: Based on the latest development plan, Phase III (i.e., the building adjacent to State College Boulevard) will consist of a 9 to 11 feet deep partial subterranean parking level. No subterranean level is planned for the remaining two buildings. The report text has been revised accordingly. 11091.001 2 Review Comment 2: Section 4.6 – Flooding reports the Site is not within a flood hazard zone or a dam inundation area. The City’s General Plan and Federal Emergency Management Agency report otherwise. References should be reviewed and information updated in the Report as necessary. Response to Review Comment 2: The site is located in the Prado Dam inundation area based on the City’s General Plan. The site is not located within a 100-year flood hazard zone; however, the northwestern corner of the site is located within the 500-year flood hazard zone based on Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) mapping. The report text has been revised accordingly. Review Comment 3: Mat foundation embedded 5 or 10 feet below lowest adjacent grade are a foundation option for the proposed development per the Report. Below grade levels are not described in Section 1.1 – Site and Project Description. Clarification regarding the recommended embedment of the mat foundation system option is needed. Response to Review Comment 3: As indicated above, Phase III will consist of a 9 to 11 feet deep partial subterranean parking level. No subterranean parking is planned for Phases I and II. Based on the current development plan, the following modulus of subgrade reaction values may be used for designing a mat foundation system: Embedment Depth (feet) Allowable Bearing Pressure (psf) Subgrade Reaction Modulus (k1) (pci) 3 feet 2,750 psf 120 5 feet 3,000 psf 125 10 feet 3,500 psf 150 15 feet 4,000 psf 175 Bearing pressure and modulus values for intermediate embedment depth can be estimated using linear interpolation. The report text has been revised accordingly. If you ha convenie listed be JMP/VP Distribut ave any qu ence at 86 elow. PI/lr tion: (1) uestions or 66-LEIGHTO Addressee if we can ON, directly e 3 be of furthe y at the ph Res LEIG Jeff Ass Exte Vinc Sen Exte er service, hone extens spectfully su GHTON AN frey M. Pflu sociate Geo ension 4257, j cent P. Ip, P nior Principa ension 1682, v please con sions or e- ubmitted, ND ASSOC eger, PG, C ologist jpflueger@lei PE, GE 252 al Engineer vip@leightong 1109 ntact us at -mail addre CIATES, INC CEG 2499 ghtongroup.c 22 r group.com 91.001 your esses C. com APPENDIX F Phase I Environmental Site Assessment PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Prepared For: JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC 600 East Las Colinas, Suite 1800 Irving, TX 75039 Attn: Heidi Mather Prepared By: The Vertex Companies, Inc. 400 Libbey Parkway Weymouth, MA 02189 781-952-6000 Vertex Project No: 35044 July 17, 2015 Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California 92805 July 17, 2015 JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC 600 East Las Colinas, Suite 1800 Irving, TX 75039 Attn: Heidi Mather RE: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California 92805 VERTEX Proj. No. 35044 Dear Ms. Mather: The Vertex Companies, Inc. (VERTEX) is pleased to submit this Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) report for the above referenced property (the site). The purpose of this assessment was to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) in connection with the site. A REC is defined as the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property; (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” It does not include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. Our work was conducted in general conformance with proposal P.1091.15 executed by Ms. Heidi Mather on June 18, 2015, and in accordance with the general provisions of the E 1527-13 American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) document entitled "Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process" for commercial real estate, as well as the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency’s (USEPA) All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) Final Rule of November 1, 2005, as amended December 30, 2013. To the best of our knowledge, this Phase I ESA report is true and accurate. VERTEX also assessed the site for the potential presence of asbestos-containing materials (ACM), lead-based paint (LBP), and radon. Page | iii We declare that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of an Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR Part 312. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Subject Property. We have developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Please do not hesitate to contact us at your convenience should you have any questions or comments regarding this report or our recommendations. It has been a pleasure working with you on this project. Sincerely, The Vertex Companies, Inc. Manasi Chavan, EIT Mark Jirgal, P.G. Assistant Project Manager Senior Project Manager Stephen P. McCarthy Vice President - Due Diligence Page | iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 SUMMARY ....................................................................................................................... 1  2.0 SITE AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS .............................................................. 7  2.1 Site Description ......................................................................................................... 7  2.2 Site Improvements ..................................................................................................... 7  2.3 Tenant Operations ..................................................................................................... 8  2.4 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties ....................................................................... 8 2.5 Physical Setting Source(s) ......................................................................................... 9  2.5.1 Topography .................................................................................................. 9  2.5.2 Surface Water ............................................................................................... 9  2.5.3 Geologic Conditions ..................................................................................... 9  2.5.4 Groundwater ................................................................................................. 9  3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION .......................................................................... 11  4.0 INTERVIEWS................................................................................................................. 12  5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW ........................................................................... 13  5.1 Historical Site Use Summary .................................................................................. 13 5.2 Historical Adjoining Properties Use Summary ....................................................... 13 5.3 Previous Environmental Reports ............................................................................. 14  5.4 Prior Ownership ...................................................................................................... 17  5.5 City Directories ....................................................................................................... 17  5.6 Aerial Photography ................................................................................................. 18 5.7 Topographic Maps ................................................................................................... 19 5.8 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps .................................................................................. 20  6.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ........................................................................ 21  6.1 On-Site Listings ....................................................................................................... 23  6.2 Off-Site Listings ...................................................................................................... 24 6.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources ............................................................. 25  7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE ........................................................................................... 27  7.1 Access Restrictions ................................................................................................. 27  7.2 Site Observations ..................................................................................................... 27  8.0 DATA GAPS.................................................................................................................... 29  9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES............................................................................................ 30  9.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) ................................................................. 30  9.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) .......................................................................................... 30  9.3 Radon ...................................................................................................................... 30  10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................ 31  Page | v 11.0 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS ....................................................................................... 32  11.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................ 32  11.2 Detailed Scope-of-Services ................................................................................. 33  11.3 Significant Assumptions ..................................................................................... 35  11.4 Limitations and Exceptions ................................................................................. 35 11.5 Special Terms and Conditions............................................................................. 37 11.6 User Reliance ...................................................................................................... 37  12.0 REFERENCES ................................................................................................................ 38  FIGURES Figure 1 Site Locus Map Figure 2 Site Plan APPENDICES Appendix A: Photographic Documentation Appendix B: Relevant Documents Appendix C: City Directories Appendix D: Aerial Photographs Appendix E: Topographic Maps Appendix F: Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps Appendix G: Regulatory Database Report Appendix H: Resumes of Environmental Professionals Page | 1 PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California 92805 VERTEX Proj. No. 35044 1.0 SUMMARY On June 23, 2015, The VERTEX Companies, Inc. (VERTEX) was contracted by Ms. Heidi Mather of JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of Stadium Park, located at 1800 East Gene Autry Way in Anaheim, California (the site). According to the Orange County Assessor’s Office, the site consists of one parcel of land occupying 18.477 acres and is identified as Parcel Number 083-290-88. The site is currently vacant. According to the Orange County Recorder’s Office, the site is currently owned by AMB Platinum, LLC. The purpose of this assessment was to identify Recognized Environmental Conditions (RECs) in connection with the site. ASTM-Findings  Based on a review of historical information, the site was used for agricultural purposes (orchards and some likely residential structures) from at least 1938 until the mid-1970s, following which the site was developed with nine commercial/industrial (office/warehouse/restaurant) buildings. A railroad spur was located adjacent south of the site, and was likely present on-site (along the south boundary) from the 1930s until the 1980s. In the mid-2000s, eight of the nine former on-site buildings were demolished, with the ninth building demolished in 2012/2013. The site has been completely vacant since 2012/2013.  The Phase I ESA conducted by URS Corporation Americas (URS) in 2005 identified the following concerns associated with the past use of the site: (a) potential presence of residual agricultural chemicals from historic use of the site for agricultural purposes; (b) potential presence of residual industrial constituents related to a motor oil release in the southeastern Page | 2 corner of the site; and (c) potential presence of residual industrial constituents from the former railroad spur on the southern portion of the site. URS conducted a limited Phase II to assess the concerns identified in the Phase I ESA. The results of the limited Phase II are described in the bullet points below, along with VERTEX’s conclusions with respect to the identified concerns.  Soil sampling (four soil samples composited into one soil sample for extractable petroleum hydrocarbons [EPH], metals, volatile organic compounds [VOCs], semi- VOCs [SVOCs], and organochlorine pesticides analyses) was conducted near the southeast corner of the site to screen soils for potential residual impact from a former motor oil release (reportedly from a former World Moving and Storage, Inc. facility located southeast of the site) and did not identify constituents above residential standards.  Soil sampling (twelve soil samples composited into three soil samples for EPH, metals, VOCs, SVOCs, and organochlorine pesticides analyses) was conducted along the former rail spur in the southern portion of the site and did not identify industrial constituents above published residential standards.  Screening of site soils (twelve soil samples from along the south site boundary composited into three soil samples for organochlorine pesticides analysis) for potential residual impact from historic agricultural use did not identify pesticides above residential standards. Arsenic was detected in one sample at a concentration slightly above the laboratory detection limit, but the concentration was considered naturally occurring for California soils. Subsequent re-analysis of the sample by the laboratory did not detect arsenic.  Regarding the potential for residual impact from a former motor oil release (reportedly from a former World Moving and Storage, Inc. facility located southeast of the site), based on the absence of any EPH, metals, VOCs, SVOCs above published residential standards in representative samples collected at the site during the 2005 limited Phase II, VERTEX does not consider the reported former motor oil release a REC to the site. Page | 3  Regarding the potential for residual impact from a former rail spur located on or adjacent to the southern portion of the site, based on the absence of any EPH, metals, VOCs, SVOCs, and organochlorine pesticides above published residential standards in representative samples collected at the site during the 2005 limited Phase II, VERTEX does not consider the former rail spur a REC to the site.  In association with the historical agricultural use of the site, residual levels of agricultural pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers may be present in soil on-site. However, based on (a) redevelopment of the site in the 1970s (including commercial/industrial buildings, asphalt- paved parking lots/drives, concrete-reinforced loading docks, landscaped areas), (b) the fact that no specific on-site facility was identified indicating the potential for elevated levels of pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, and (c) the absence of any organochlorine pesticides above published residential standards in representative samples collected at the site during the 2005 limited Phase II, VERTEX does not consider the former use of the site for agricultural purposes a REC to the site.  VERTEX conducted a regulatory review that included a search of state and federal regulatory databases to identify potential environmental concerns for the site and surrounding properties. According to the information presented in the EDR Report, the site was identified on the following databases:  D & F Industries, an on-site facility, was listed on the HAZNET database for disposal of other organic solids and other inorganic solid waste from the site in 1995, and disposal of hazardous materials from the site from 1996-2003, including aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent, unspecified solvent mixture, oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.), laboratory waste chemicals, waste oil and mixed oil, and off-specification, aged or surplus inorganics. In 2000, D & F Industries was also listed for disposal of 0.16 tons of halogenated solvents (chloroform, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc.). D & F Industries was also listed on the EMI database in 1996 for emissions of total organic hydrocarbon gases and reactive organic gases at the site. Although D & F Industries was listed for disposal of 0.16 tons of an unspecified Page | 4 halogenated solvent in 2000, VERTEX does not consider this listing a concern based on the single year of reported disposal, the limited quantity of solvent usage recorded, the lack of reported releases or violations associated with the facility, and the lack of VOCs reported during the 2005 limited Phase II.  From 2002 until 2011, NBTY Manufacturing LLC was listed on the HAZNET database for disposal of hazardous materials, including aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent, hydrocarbon solvents, other inorganic solid waste, unspecified oil-containing waste, other organic solids, liquids with pH<=2, alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals, liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 mg/L, latex waste, unspecified organic liquid mixture, oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.), unspecified solvent mixture, and off-specification, aged or surplus inorganics. NBTY Manufacturing LLC was also listed the EMI database for emissions of total organic hydrocarbon gases and reactive organic gases at the site in 2001. VERTEX does not consider these listings a concern based on the lack of reported releases or violations associated with the facility.  The site currently consists of vacant land. Two crushed concrete stockpiles, one significantly larger than the other (the smaller stockpile consisted of black colored asphalt), were observed in the northwest portion of the site. Additionally, a crushed concrete mound (approximately 2-3 feet high) was observed in the north-central portion of the site, and two overgrown soil mounds (approximately 2-3 feet high) were observed in the southwest and south-central portions of the site. According to Ms. Nancy Shultz (Vice President, Investment Officer with Prologis, Inc.), the crushed concrete piles consist of crushed concrete slabs and walls from the former on-site buildings that were demolished at their respective locations. Ms. Shultz stated that the black material from the smaller stockpile in the northwest portion of the site was likely ground up asphalt. Ms. Shultz also stated that the two soil stockpiles in the southern portion of the site consist of site soil removed from beneath former loading docks at these locations. No evidence of staining or a release was observed in the concrete and soil stockpiles. VERTEX understands that these stockpiles will be removed from the site by the Page | 5 seller. Based on this information, VERTEX does not consider these stockpiles to be RECs in connection with the site.  Based on a review of historical information, surrounding areas generally consisted of agricultural land since at least 1938. The properties to the north of the site were developed with the present day commercial/industrial buildings starting in the late 1950s/early 1960s (northwest properties have been vacant since the mid-2000s). The property to the east of the site was developed with the present day baseball stadium in the early 1960s. The properties to the south of the site were developed with the present day commercial/industrial buildings in the 1980s and the current apartment building in the mid-2000s. The properties to the west of the site were developed with the present day commercial/industrial buildings in the 1980s.  Several facilities within the ASTM search distances of the site were identified on regulatory databases. However, based on distance, apparent gradient relationship, regulatory status, and/or other facility-specific characteristics, no RECs to the site were identified with respect to these facilities. Non-ASTM Additional Services In accordance with the proposed scope of work, VERTEX conducted additional services as discussed in Section 9.0 of this report, including the assessment of: asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), and radon, which revealed:  Assessment of the additional services did not identify Business Environmental Risks associated with the site. Conclusions VERTEX has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, of Stadium Park, located at 1800 East Gene Autry Way in Anaheim, Page | 6 California. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 8.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the site. In the event that soil resulting from excavation activities as part of development requires export off-site, VERTEX recommends that the material be tested according to recommended testing protocol for clean soil export and managed appropriately during construction. Based on our understanding of the client’s objectives, risk tolerance, and future plans for the site, this assessment did not identify business environmental risk associated with the additional services performed. Obtaining additional information is not warranted to better evaluate these non-ASTM issues. Page | 7 2.0 SITE AND VICINITY CHARACTERISTICS 2.1 Site Description The site is located at 1800 East Gene Autry Way in Anaheim, California. According to the Orange County Assessor’s Office, the site consists of one parcel of land occupying 18.477 acres and is identified as Parcel Number 083-290-88. The site is currently vacant. The site location is shown on Figure 1 - Site Locus Map. 2.2 Site Improvements The site currently consists of vacant land. Two crushed concrete stockpiles, one significantly larger than the other (the smaller stockpile consisted of black colored concrete and asphalt), were observed in the northwest portion of the site. A crushed concrete mound (approximately 2-3 feet high) was observed in the north-central portion of the site, and two overgrown soil mounds (approximately 2-3 feet high) were observed in the southwest and south-central portions of the site. According to Ms. Nancy Shultz (Vice President, Investment Officer with Prologis, Inc), the crushed concrete piles were ground up building materials from the former buildings that were demolished at their respective locations. Ms. Shultz stated that the black material from the smaller stockpile in the northwest portion of the site was probably ground up asphalt. Ms. Shultz also stated that the two soil stockpiles in the southern portion of the site consist of site soil removed from beneath the former loading docks at these locations. No evidence of staining or a release was observed in the concrete and soil stockpiles. VERTEX understands that these stockpiles will be removed from the site by the seller. Based on this information, VERTEX does not consider these stockpiles to be RECs in connection with the site. Asphalt paved driveways were observed throughout the site. Two pad mounted transformers and an electrical closet were observed in the central portion of the site. Two empty enclosures (likely for dumpsters) were also observed in the central portion of the site. No structures or other improvements are currently present on-site. Page | 8 For a layout of the site, please refer to Figure 2 - Site Plan. Photographic documentation of the site and surrounding areas is presented in Appendix A. 2.3 Tenant Operations The site consists of vacant land. No ongoing tenant operations are currently present on-site. 2.4 Current Uses of Adjoining Properties The site is located in a residential and commercial/industrial area. Adjoining properties were evaluated (from the site or from public access areas) for signs of RECs and their potential to pose an environmental concern to the site. The uses and features of adjoining properties are described in the following table. The locations of these properties relative to the site are depicted on Figure 2 – Site Plan. NEARBY/ADJOINING PROPERTY SUMMARY DIRECTION PROPERTY USE CONCERNS North East Gene Autry Way bounds the site to the north, beyond which is the Southern California Gas Company addressed 1911 S State College Boulevard, a commercial/industrial building addressed 1605 E Gene Autry Way, and some vacant land. See below East State College Road bounds the site to the east, beyond which is the Angel Stadium of Anaheim (baseball) addressed 2000 E Gene Autry Way. See below South An alleyway partially bounds the site to the south, beyond which is an apartment building addressed 2045 S State College Boulevard and commercial (office) buildings addressed 1515-1535 E Orangewood Avenue. None West To the west of the site are commercial/industrial buildings addressed 1300 E Gene Autry Way and 1190 E Stanford Court. None See Section 6.2 for discussion of regulatory listings related to the Southern California Gas Company property to the north of the site and the Anaheim Stadium property to the east of the site. Page | 9 2.5 Physical Setting Source(s) Physical setting sources specified in Section 12.0 of this report were reviewed to provide information about the geology and hydrogeology of the site. 2.5.1 Topography A review of the 1981 USGS Topographic Quadrangle Map of Anaheim, California indicates that the surface elevation of the site is approximately 147 feet above mean sea level (amsl). The topography of the site is relatively level. Topography in the vicinity of the site is relatively level but slopes gradually downward to the southwest. 2.5.2 Surface Water No naturally-occurring surface water bodies were observed on-site. 2.5.3 Geologic Conditions According to the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Web Soil Survey, soils at the site consist of the Metz soils. The Metz soil consists of loamy sand, is somewhat excessively drained, and has high permeability. 2.5.4 Groundwater Based on local surface topography, groundwater is expected to flow to the southwest across the site. Groundwater monitoring records reviewed by VERTEX for the Starwood O.C. Portfolio VII, L.L.C. property (located approximately 450 feet to the south of the site) indicated that depth to groundwater was estimated to be approximately 80 feet below ground surface (bgs). Groundwater at the site is expected to be present at a similar depth. Actual local groundwater flow direction can be influenced by factors such as local surface topography, underground Page | 10 structures, seasonal fluctuations, soil and bedrock geology, and production wells, none of which were considered during this study. Page | 11 3.0 USER-PROVIDED INFORMATION VERTEX requested the following information about the site from JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC (“User”):  An evaluation of the presence of environmental cleanup liens for the site;  Activity and use limitations (AULs) such as engineering controls (e.g., slurry walls, caps) and land use restrictions or institutional controls (e.g., deed restrictions, covenants) that may be in place for the site;  Specialized knowledge that includes personal knowledge or experience related to the site or nearby properties based on professional experience or knowledge of the site;  Fair market value (FMV) to evaluate whether the purchase price of any parcel was significantly below FMV;  Obvious indicators that involve past or present spills, stains, releases, cleanups on or near the site;  Common knowledge about use of specific chemicals, possible contamination, or past use of the site and surrounding area;  Reason for performing the ESA. Ms. Mather stated that the work was being conducted in support of a potential real estate transaction and provided reports of previous environmental assessments conducted at the site (see Section 5.3). No other information regarding the site was provided by the Client. Page | 12 4.0 INTERVIEWS VERTEX conducted an interview regarding site history and the current on-site operations with the following individuals: INTERVIEWS NAME/ COMPANY TITLE/POSITION INFORMATION PROVIDED Ms. Nancy Shultz/ Prologis, Inc. Vice President, Investment Officer Provided information regarding existing site conditions Municipal Officials Various Provided municipal information Information obtained from these interviews is discussed in relevant sections of this report. Please refer to Section 6.3 for a summary of information obtained from municipal inquiries. Page | 13 5.0 HISTORICAL RECORDS REVIEW Past land uses for the site and adjoining properties were assessed to identify historical practices or conditions that may have impacted the site. This was accomplished by reviewing historical information from several sources including but not limited to interviews with the current owner, review of available previous environmental reports and ownership records, and review of historical information obtained from regulatory sources, aerial photographs, city directories, and historical maps. 5.1 Historical Site Use Summary Based on a review of historical information, the site was used for agricultural purposes (orchards and some likely residential structures) from at least 1938 until the mid-1970s, following which the site was developed with nine commercial/industrial (office/warehouse/restaurant) buildings. A railroad spur was located adjacent south of the site, and was likely present on-site (along the south boundary) from the 1930s until the 1980s. In the mid-2000s, eight of the nine former on- site buildings were demolished, with the ninth building demolished in 2012/2013. The site has been completely vacant since 2012/2013. Environmental concerns were identified in association with the historical uses of the site, which are discussed in Sections 5.3 and 6.1. 5.2 Historical Adjoining Properties Use Summary Based on a review of historical information, surrounding areas generally consisted of agricultural land since at least 1938. The properties to the north of the site were developed with the present day commercial/industrial buildings starting in the late 1950s/early 1960s (northwest properties have been vacant since the mid-2000s). The property to the east of the site was developed with the present day baseball stadium in the early 1960s. The properties to the south of the site were developed with the present day commercial/industrial buildings starting in the 1980s and the current apartment building in the mid-2000s. The properties to the west of the site were Page | 14 developed with the present day commercial/industrial buildings in the 1980s. See Section 6.2 for discussion of regulatory listings related to the Southern California Gas Company property to the north of the site and Anaheim Stadium property to the east of the site. 5.3 Previous Environmental Reports VERTEX was provided with the following previous reports: Phase I ESA and Limited Phase II Testing, Stadium Business Park, 1929-2035 State College Blvd. and 1500-1920 Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, California, prepared by URS Corporation Americas (URS), dated April 4, 2005 This report was prepared for AMB Property Corporation in order to assess the environmental status of the site by identifying existing and potential RECs. At the time of the URS assessment, the site consisted of nine buildings (totaling approximately 282,492 square feet); five warehouse buildings, three multi-tenant office/warehouse buildings, and one restaurant building. These buildings were constructed between 1975 and 1976, prior to which the site was primarily used for agricultural purposes, and was possibly occupied with several small residential structures. The site use at the time of the assessment consisted of office, warehouse storage and distribution, light industrial, and retail. To investigate the potential for impacts identified by the Phase I ESA, limited Phase II soil testing was performed to screen soils for: (a) the potential presence of residual industrial constituents related to the motor oil release in the southeastern corner of the site; (b) the former railroad spur on the southern portion of the site; and (c) the potential presence of residual agricultural chemicals from the historic use of the site for agricultural purposes. Based on the results of the Phase II, URS concluded the following:  Soil sampling (four soil samples composited into one soil sample for EPH, metals, VOCs, SVOCs, and organochlorine pesticides analyses) conducted near the southeast corner of the site to screen soils for potential residual impact from a former motor oil release (reportedly from a former World Moving and Storage, Inc. facility located southeast of the site) did not identify constituents above residential standards. Based upon the results of the testing, the Page | 15 reported removal of the impacted soil from this area, and the lack of follow-up actions by applicable regulatory agencies, URS concluded that the motor oil release was unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the site.  Soil sampling (twelve soil samples composited into three soil samples for EPH, metals, VOCs, SVOCs, and organochlorine pesticides analyses) conducted along the former rail spur did not identify industrial constituents above published residential standards. Based upon the results of the testing, and the removal of the rail spur, URS concluded that the former rail area was unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the site.  Screening of site soils (twelve soil samples from along the south site boundary composited into three soil samples for organochlorine pesticides analyses) for potential residual impact from historic agricultural use did not identify pesticides above residential standards. Arsenic was detected in one sample at a concentration slightly above the laboratory detection limit, but at a concentration considered naturally occurring for California soils. Subsequent re- analysis of the sample by the laboratory did not detect arsenic. Based upon the results of the testing, URS concluded that the historic agricultural use was unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the site. The URS report also stated that regulatory databases identified a sewage release at the site in 1998. While details regarding the sewage release were not available, based on the absence of required follow-up actions, URS concluded that the issue is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the site. VERTEX concurs with the URS’ conclusions. Asbestos Survey Buildings 3 and 4, Gene Autry/State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California, prepared by Hygienetics Environmental Services, Inc. (Hygienetics), dated January 3, 2008 Ninety-nine bulk samples were collected from buildings 3 and 4 for analyses by polarized light microscopy (PLM). Three samples (textured coating in suite 1987 and linoleum under vinyl floor tile in suite 1979) collected from building 3 and six samples (textured coatings in suites 2015, 2017, 2029, and 2031, and covebase mastic in suites 2035 and 2025) collected from building 4 Page | 16 contained asbestos above the laboratory detection limit. Hygienetics recommended that if additional suspect asbestos containing materials are discovered during the course of demolition activities, those materials should be sampled for asbestos prior to disturbance. Because all of the on-site buildings have been demolished, and the site is currently vacant, VERTEX does not consider the former presence of asbestos in building materials to be a concern to the site. Soils Reports, Gene Autry Experience, Anaheim, California, prepared by Southwest Inspection & Testing, Inc. (Southwest), dated July 14, 2008 Crushed miscellaneous base from the site was reportedly analyzed through sieve analysis. In addition, on July 8, 2008, a rock sample was reportedly analyzed for total petroleum hydrocarbons as gasoline (TPH-g), TPH as diesel (TPH-d), and metals. The laboratory analysis detected no concentrations of TPH-g and TPH-d above the respective laboratory detection limits. Several metals were detected above their respective laboratory detection limits, but only arsenic and cobalt were detected above the U.S. EPA Region 9 Regional Screening Levels (RSLs). Arsenic was detected at a concentration of 12.4 mg/kg, and cobalt was detected at a concentration of 3.6 mg/kg. However, these detected concentrations of arsenic and cobalt are well within the naturally occurring concentrations of these metals in California soils (95th percentile estimate for naturally occurring arsenic is 17 mg/kg and 95th percentile estimate for naturally occurring cobalt is 22.2 mg/kg). No information was provided regarding the exact location of the crushed miscellaneous base (or the rock) sampled at the site. However, based on no detected concentrations of TPH-g and TPH- d, and the naturally occurring levels of detected arsenic and cobalt from this crushed miscellaneous base sampled at the site, this lack of information does not represent a concern to the site. Page | 17 5.4 Prior Ownership VERTEX obtained site ownership information from the Orange County Recorder’s Office. The site is currently owned by AMB Platinum, LLC. Available ownership information for this property is summarized below. DEED RECORDS REVIEW GRANTOR GRANTEE DOCUMENT TYPE DOCUMENT NUMBER DATE AMB Property, L.P. AMB Platinum, LLC Grant Deed 2008000363944 7/31/2008 Deed records dated prior to 2006 were not readily available. However, a 50-year chain-of-title was reviewed as part of the 2005 ESA. According to this review, the site was mainly owned by private individuals in the 1940’s and 1950’s; however an easement was granted to Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company in July 1958. In 1960, the site or portions of the site changed ownership between various individuals from the City of Anaheim and the Orangewood Development Company. Other owners in the 1960’s included various individuals, Malibu Shore Properties, GANCO and FANCO Corporations, and the Incentive Aid Foundation. Company ownership of the site during the 1970’s included Pacific World, Golden West Equity Properties, Inc., and the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, which received an easement. In 1981, Equitec 80 Real Estate Investors owned a portion of the site, and in 1989, Stadium Business Park South was indicated as an owner. No evidence of prior owners of environmental concern was identified in the deed records reviewed. Additionally, no environmental liens or AULs were identified during review of ownership records. Prior owners of the site were not available to be interviewed. 5.5 City Directories VERTEX reviewed historical city directory information for the site and adjoining properties as provided by EDR. Copies of select city directories are included in Appendix C. A summary of listings is presented below. Page | 18 CITY DIRECTORY REVIEW YEAR SUMMARY (ON-SITE) SUMMARY (OFF-SITE) CONCERNS 1966, 1970, 1975, 1980, 1986, 1991 Several commercial/industrial listings of no significant concern. 2000 E Gene Autry Way: Anaheim Stadium No other listings of significant concern were identified adjacent to the site. See below 1995, 2003, 2008, 2013 Several commercial/industrial listings of no significant concern. No other listings of significant concern were identified adjacent to the site. See below See section 6.1 for discussion of regulatory listings associated with the former commercial/industrial occupants on-site. See Section 6.2 for discussion on regulatory listings related to the Anaheim Stadium property to the east of the site. 5.6 Aerial Photography VERTEX reviewed aerial photographs including the site and adjoining properties. Copies of the aerial photographs are included in Appendix D. A summary of information obtained from the review is provided in the table below. AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY REVIEW YEAR SUMMARY (ON-SITE) SUMMARY (OFF-SITE) CONCERNS 1938 1947 1953 The site appears to consist of agricultural land (orchards) with possible residential structures. The surrounding properties appear to consist of agricultural land parcels (orchards). None 1963 Relatively unchanged. Relatively unchanged, except that some of the present day commercial/industrial buildings are depicted to the north of the site and a commercial/industrial building is depicted to the south of the site. See below 1972 Relatively unchanged. Relatively unchanged, except that the present day baseball stadium and associated parking lot is depicted to the east of the site. See below 1977 The site appears to be developed with six commercial/industrial buildings and the three buildings near the northeast corner of the site appear to be under construction. Relatively unchanged. See below Page | 19 AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY REVIEW YEAR SUMMARY (ON-SITE) SUMMARY (OFF-SITE) CONCERNS 1987 1990 Relatively unchanged. Relatively unchanged, except that some more present day commercial/industrial buildings are depicted to the north of the site, the previously existing commercial/industrial building to the south of the site is no longer present and some of the present day commercial/industrial buildings are depicted to the south of the site, and the present day commercial/industrial buildings are depicted to the west of the site. See below 1995 2005 Relatively unchanged. Relatively unchanged, except that the remaining present day commercial/industrial building is depicted to the north of the site. See below 2009 2010 2012 Only one of the 9 previously existing commercial/ industrial buildings is depicted on-site. Relatively unchanged, except that the present day vacant land is depicted to the north-northwest of the site and the present day residential building is depicted to the south of the site. See below See section 6.1 for discussion of regulatory listings associated with the former commercial/industrial occupants on-site. See Section 6.2 for discussion of regulatory listings related to the Southern California Gas Company property to the north of the site and Anaheim Stadium property to the east of the site. 5.7 Topographic Maps VERTEX reviewed historical topographic maps including the site and surrounding areas. Copies of the topographic maps are included in Appendix E. A summary of information obtained from the review is provided in the table below. TOPOGRAPHIC MAP REVIEW YEAR SUMMARY (ON-SITE) SUMMARY (OFF-SITE) CONCERNS 1898 The site appears to be vacant. Surrounding properties appear to consist of vacant land. None 1901 1902 The scale of these maps precluded identification of past uses of the site. The scale of these maps precluded identification of past uses of the surrounding area. None 1935 The site appears to be vacant. Surrounding properties appear to consist of vacant land. A railroad spur is depicted adjacent to the south of the site (likely was also present on-site, along the south boundary). See below Page | 20 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP REVIEW YEAR SUMMARY (ON-SITE) SUMMARY (OFF-SITE) CONCERNS 1942 The site appears to consist of agricultural land (orchards). Surrounding properties appear to consist of agricultural land (orchards). A railroad spur is depicted adjacent to the south of the site (likely was also present on-site, along the south boundary). See below 1950 The site appears to be vacant. Surrounding properties appear to consist of vacant land. A railroad spur is depicted adjacent to the south of the site (likely was also present on-site, along the south boundary). See below 1965 Relatively unchanged Relatively unchanged, except that some agricultural land and one of the present day commercial/industrial buildings is depicted to the north of the site, the present day baseball stadium is depicted to the east of the site, and a commercial/ industrial building is depicted to the south of the site. See below 1972 Relatively unchanged. Relatively unchanged, except that the properties to the north of the site previously depicted as agricultural land are now depicted as vacant. See below 1981 The site appears to be developed with nine commercial/industrial buildings. Relatively unchanged, except that some more present day commercial/industrial buildings are depicted to the north of the site. See below See Section 5.3 for discussion of the prior assessments conducted along the former railroad spur reportedly located on the southern portion of the site. See section 6.1 for discussion of regulatory listings associated with the former commercial/industrial occupants on-site. See Section 6.2 for discussion of regulatory listings related to the Southern California Gas Company property to the north of the site and Anaheim Stadium property to the east of the site. 5.8 Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps A search of Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps was requested by VERTEX. According to EDR Sanborn, Inc., maps depicting the site were not available (Appendix F). Page | 21 6.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW VERTEX obtained a regulatory database report as specified in Section 12.0. Review of databases and files from federal, state, and local environmental regulatory agencies was used to identify use, generation, storage, treatment, or disposal of hazardous materials and chemicals, or release incidents of such materials that might have impacted the site. The databases discussed in the following sections address ASTM requirements. Additional federal and state databases may have also been reviewed, and if so, they are listed in the table below. A copy of the database report is included in Appendix G. VERTEX’s review of these listings assessed the potential for soil, groundwater, and/or soil vapor impacts to the subject site from on-site listings or listings at surrounding facilities, taking into account such factors as the assumed groundwater depth and flow direction, regulatory status, distance from the site, and other information reported by the regulatory database(s) and/or other sources of information. A summary of the database information is provided in the following table. REGULATORY DATABASE SUMMARY DATABASE ASTM RADIUS TARGET PROPERTY SURROUNDING FACILITIES National Priorities List (NPL)/Proposed NPL/De-listed NPL 1 Mile - 0 Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Sites ½ Mile - 0 CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned (CERC- NFRAP) Sites ½ Mile - 1 Corrective Action Report (CORRACTS) 1 Mile - 0 Resource Conservation and Recovery Act Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities (RCRA-TSDF) ½ Mile - 0 RCRA Large Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators (RCRA-LQG) ¼ Mile - 7 RCRA Small Quantity Hazardous Waste Generators (RCRA-SQG) ¼ Mile - 12 RCRA Former Hazardous Waste Generators/No Longer Regulated Sites (RCRA NonGen/NLR) ¼ Mile - 1 Page | 22 REGULATORY DATABASE SUMMARY DATABASE ASTM RADIUS TARGET PROPERTY SURROUNDING FACILITIES Facility Index System (FINDS) Target Property 1 - Emergency Response Notification System (ERNS) Target Property - - Federal and/or State Institutional Controls/Engineering Controls Target Property - - State Hazardous Waste Sites (SHWS) 1 Mile - 0 State- and tribal- equivalent CERCLIS (ENVIROSTOR) 1 Mile - 11 Solid Waste Facilities/Landfills (SWF/LF) ½ Mile - 0 State and tribal Leaking Storage Tanks lists (LUST) ½ Mile - 34 State and tribal Leaking Storage Tanks lists (SLIC) ½ Mile - 1 HIST CORTESE ½ Mile - 18 State and tribal registered storage tank lists (UST) ¼ Mile - 10 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks (CA FID UST) ¼ Mile - 8 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks (HIST UST) ¼ Mile - 7 Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks (SWEEPS UST) ¼ Mile - 8 State and tribal registered storage tank lists (AST) ¼ Mile - 1 State Voluntary Cleanup Program (VCP) Sites ½ Mile - 1 HAZNET Target Property 4 - E MI Target Property 2 - EDR US Hist Auto Stat ¼ Mile - 3 The EDR database report includes an orphan summary. This summary identifies facilities that are listed on one of the above-referenced databases or lists, but do not include complete or accurate geographic data. Consequently, EDR was unable to map the facilities in relation to the site. VERTEX reviewed the orphan summary prior to inspecting the site and surrounding properties. Orphan properties located within ASTM search distances of the site (if any) were incorporated into VERTEX’s review. Page | 23 6.1 On-Site Listings According to the information presented in the EDR Report, the site was identified on the following databases:  D & F Industries was listed on the HAZNET database for disposal of other organic solids and other inorganic solid waste from the site in 1995, and disposal of hazardous materials from the site from 1996-2003, including aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent, unspecified solvent mixture, unspecified aqueous solution, laboratory waste chemicals, oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.), laboratory waste chemicals, waste oil and mixed oil, and off-specification, aged or surplus inorganics.. In 2000, D & F Industries was also listed for disposal of 0.16 tons of halogenated solvents (chloroform, methyl chloride, perchloroethylene, etc.). D & F Industries was also listed on the EMI database for emissions of total organic hydrocarbon gases and reactive organic gases at the site in 1996. Although D & F Industries was listed for disposal of 0.16 tons of an unspecified halogenated solvent in 2000, VERTEX does not consider this listing a concern based on the single year of reported disposal, the limited quantity of solvent usage recorded, and the lack of reported releases or violations associated with the facility. Although D & F Industries was listed for disposal of 0.16 tons of an unspecified halogenated solvent in 2000, VERTEX does not consider this listing a concern based on the single year of reported disposal, the limited quantity of solvent usage recorded, the lack of reported releases or violations associated with the facility, and the lack of VOCs reported during the 2005 limited Phase II.  From 2002-2011, NBTY Manufacturing LLC was listed on the HAZNET database for disposal of hazardous materials including aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percent, hydrocarbon solvents, other inorganic solid waste, unspecified oil- containing waste, other organic solids, liquids with pH<=2, alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metals, liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 mg/L, latex waste, unspecified organic liquid mixture, oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.), unspecified solvent mixture, and off-specification, aged or surplus inorganics. NBTY Manufacturing LLC was listed the EMI database for emissions of total organic hydrocarbon Page | 24 gases and reactive organic gases at the site in 2001. VERTEX does not consider these listings a concern based on the lack of reported releases or violations associated with the facility. 6.2 Off-Site Listings A review of state and federal regulatory records revealed several facilities within ASTM- specified search radii of the site. Of these facilities, seven (7) were located within 500 feet of the site and are discussed in the table below. The remaining database listings are not considered environmental concerns to the site based on distance, regulatory status, and/or apparent groundwater gradient and are not further discussed. OFF-SITE STATE AND FEDERAL LISTINGS FACILITY DISTANCE AND DIRECTION; GRADIENT REGULATORY STATUS CONCERNS Anaheim Stadium 2000 S State College Blvd. 100 feet east- northeast; Up-gradient/ Cross- gradient RCRA-SQG: This facility was reported as a small quantity generator in 1990. No violations were reported for this facility. FINDS: Refers back to the information described in the RCRA listing discussed above. CA FID UST: No details reported. UST: No details reported. No violations and/or releases were reported for this facility. None Southern California Gas Company 1919 S State College Blvd. 100 feet north; Up-gradient/ Cross-gradient UST: No details reported. SWEEPS UST: Two USTs reported for this facility. No violations and/or releases were reported for this facility. HIST UST: Two waste and one product USTs reported for this facility. RCRA-LQG: This facility was reported as a large quantity generator in 1991. EDR US Hist Auto Stat: Listed as So California Gas Co in 2001. CA FID UST: No details reported. No violations and/or releases were reported for this facility. None Rocky Mountain Industries Inc. 1880 Chris Lane 100 feet north-northwest; Cross-gradient RCRA-SQG: This facility was reported as a small quantity generator in 1996. No violations were reported for this facility. FINDS: Refers back to the information described in the RCRA listing discussed above. CA FID UST: No details reported. UST: No details reported. SWEEPS UST: One 12,000-gallon regular unleaded fuel UST reported for this facility. HAZNET: Listed for the disposal of tank bottom waste from this facility in 1997. EMI: Listed for emissions of total organic hydrocarbon None Page | 25 OFF-SITE STATE AND FEDERAL LISTINGS FACILITY DISTANCE AND DIRECTION; GRADIENT REGULATORY STATUS CONCERNS gases and reactive organic gases at this facility in 1987, 1990, 1995, and 1996. No violations and/or releases were reported for this facility. Veterinary Reference Laboratory 1871 Chris Lane 100 feet north- northwest; Cross-gradient RCRA-SQG: This facility was reported as a small quantity generator in 1996. No violations were reported for this facility. FINDS: Refers back to the information described in the RCRA listing discussed above. No violations and/or releases were reported for this facility. None Millennium Circuits 1200 E Gene Autry Way 300 feet west; Cross-gradient RCRA-SQG: This facility was reported as a small quantity generator in 2000. No violations were reported for this facility. FINDS: Refers back to the information described in the RCRA listing discussed above. No violations and/or releases were reported for this facility. None Cooper Power Tools 2000 S Santa Cruz St 400 feet west; Cross-gradient RCRA-SQG: This facility was reported as a small quantity generator in 1999. No violations were reported for this facility. FINDS: Refers back to the information described in the RCRA listing discussed above. HAZNET: Listed for the disposal of hazardous materials from 1999 to 2010. No violations and/or releases were reported for this facility. None 2099 S State College Blvd. 450 feet south; Down-gradient CA FID UST: No details reported at the State College Plaza facility. UST: No details reported at the State College Plaza facility. SWEEPS UST: One 550-gallon gasoline UST reported at the State College Plaza facility. LUST: Soil affected by diesel at the Starwood O.C Portfolio VII, LLC facility, clean up was completed, and case was closed in 2003. None The above referenced facilities located within 500 feet from the site are not considered an environmental concern to the site based on distance, regulatory status, and/or apparent groundwater gradient. 6.3 Additional Environmental Record Sources VERTEX contacted local agencies to request information relevant to the site and vicinity. A summary of the agencies contacted and the information obtained is included in the following table. Page | 26 LOCAL RESEARCH SUMMARY OFFICE INFORMATION OBTAINED CONCERNS City of Anaheim Building Department Reviewed available records for site. None City of Anaheim Fire Department Response not received. Request Pending City of Anaheim Public Works Department (APWD) According to APWD representative, there may be three laterals connecting to City sewer, but due to their age (1976) and the demolition of previous structures, it was not clear if they are still functional/in place. None County of Orange County Health Care Agency Response not received. Request Pending RWQCB – Santa Ana Region No records for the site were identified. None Orange County Assessor’s Office Reviewed property card. None Orange County Recorder’s Office Reviewed prior owners, searched for lien or AUL for the site. None Page | 27 7.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE A site visit was conducted by VERTEX representative Manasi Chavan, Assistant Project Manager, on July 1, 2015 between 11:00 a.m. and 12:00 p.m. VERTEX was not escorted during the site visit. During the site visit, the weather was sunny with a temperature of approximately 75o Fahrenheit. The site visit consisted of a walk-through and visual reconnaissance of neighboring properties from curbside. Photographic documentation of the site visit is included in Appendix A. 7.1 Access Restrictions VERTEX visually and physically observed accessible areas of the site. No limitations imposed by physical obstructions or other limiting conditions were observed. 7.2 Site Observations Observations of site conditions were made during the site reconnaissance and are summarized in the table below. Issues of concern are discussed in greater detail following the table. SITE OBSERVATIONS DESCRIPTION REPORTED/ OBSERVED ON-SITE Y/N COMMENTS Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products N None observed. UST(s) N VERTEX did not observe fill pipes, vent pipes or other evidence of UST(s). VERTEX did not observe operations and/or equipment that are typically associated with significant fuel or chemical storage that typically utilizes USTs. AST(s) N VERTEX did not observe evidence of AST(s). VERTEX did not observe operations and/or equipment that are typically associated with significant fuel or chemical storage that typically utilizes ASTs. Strong, Pungent, or Noxious Odors N Not identified during the site visit. Pools of Liquid N Not identified during the site visit. Page | 28 SITE OBSERVATIONS DESCRIPTION REPORTED/ OBSERVED ON-SITE Y/N COMMENTS Drums N Not identified during the site visit. Unidentified Substance Containers N None Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCB)-containing Equipment N Two pad mounted transformers in the central portion of the site. No staining or evidence of a release was observed in the vicinity of the equipment which is owned and operated by Southern California Edison. Utilities (Electricity/ Natural Gas) N Electricity - None currently supplied to the site. Natural gas - None currently supplied to the site. Hydraulic Equipment N No hydraulic equipment was observed during the site visit. Water Supply N No water is currently being supplied to the site. Wells N On-site water extraction or groundwater monitoring wells were not identified or reported. Wastewater N No wastewater is currently being generated on-site. According to APWD representative, there may be three laterals connecting to City sewer, but due to their age (1976) and the demolition of previous structures, it was not clear if they are still functional/in place. Septic N No evidence of current or former septic systems were noted. Storm Water Y Two in-ground stormwater traps were noted on-site. Flood Plain Y According to the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Map (FIRM), the site is partially (northwest portion) located within the 500-year flood zone. Pits, Ponds, Lagoons N None Stained Soil, Stained Pavement, Corrosion to Pavement N Not identified during the site visit. Stressed Vegetation N Not identified during the site visit. Solid Waste N No solid waste is currently being generated on-site. Hazardous Waste Management N None Heating/Cooling N None Drains, Sumps, Oil/Water Separators/Sand Traps Y Two storm water traps resulting from previous site development were noted on-site. No staining or other obvious concerns were noted. Vapor Intrusion N As part of this assessment, VERTEX assessed the potential for impacts to the site from potential on- and off-site sources of vapor intrusion. The potential for impacts from off-site properties included a review of current off-site operations (see Section 2.4), a review of historical operations (see Section 5.2), and a review of regulatory database records (see Section 6.2). Potential sources of on- or off-site vapor intrusion were not identified. Page | 29 8.0 DATA GAPS The lack of information regarding the exact location of the crushed miscellaneous base (or the rock) sampled at the site in 2008, represents a data gap pursuant to ASTM E1527-13. Based on no detected concentrations of TPH-g and TPH-d, and the naturally occurring levels of detected arsenic and cobalt from the crushed miscellaneous base sampled at the site, this data gap is not significant with respect to identifying RECs in connection with the site. Deviations or deletions from the scope of work defined by ASTM E 1527-13 were not intentionally made. Our conclusions regarding the potential environmental impact of nearby, off-site facilities on the site are based on readily available information from the environmental databases and the assumed groundwater flow direction as inferred from the topography of the site and surrounding area. A detailed file review of each facility was beyond the scope of work. However, VERTEX conducted a limited review of regulatory files at the City of Anaheim, Orange County, and RWQCB offices for the site and/or adjacent properties. Page | 30 9.0 ADDITIONAL SERVICES The following additional (non-ASTM) services were performed as part of this assessment. 9.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) A visual survey of limited building areas was performed to assess major classes of accessible suspect ACM that may be present. Based on the absence of any structures currently on-site, suspect ACM is not considered a concern to the site. See Section 5.3 for discussion related to a former (2008) asbestos survey conducted at the site. 9.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Based on the absence of any structures currently on-site and previous removal of surface soils, it is unlikely that LBP is present on-site. As such, LBP is not considered a concern to this investigation. 9.3 Radon The site is located in Orange County, which is identified as a Zone 3 radon area. Areas within Zone 3 have an average indoor radon level that is less than 2 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L). The U.S. EPA action level for radon is 4 pCi/L. As such, the site is located in an area of low radon potential. The site is currently vacant/ undeveloped. As such, radon is not considered a concern to the site. Page | 31 10.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS VERTEX has performed a Phase I ESA in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM E 1527-13, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, of Stadium Park, located at 1800 East Gene Autry Way in Anaheim, California. Exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 8.0 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of RECs in connection with the site. In the event that soil resulting from excavation activities as part of development requires export off-site, VERTEX recommends that the material be tested according to recommended testing protocol for clean soil export and managed appropriately during construction. Based on our understanding of the client’s objectives, risk tolerance, and future plans for the site, this assessment did not identify business environmental risk associated with the additional services performed. It is our opinion that obtaining additional information is not warranted to better evaluate these non-ASTM issues. Page | 32 11.0 SCOPE AND LIMITATIONS 11.1 Purpose The primary purpose of this assessment is to identify, to the extent feasible pursuant to the processes prescribed in ASTM E 1527-13, RECs in connection with the site. As defined in ASTM E 1527-13, a REC is defined as “the presence or likely presence of hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: (1) due to release to the environment; (2) under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or (3) under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment.” It does not include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a threat to human health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. A “historical REC” is defined in ASTM E 1527-13 as a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. ASTM E 1527-13 defines the term “controlled REC” as a recognized environmental condition resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority (for example, as evidenced by the issuance of a no further action letter or equivalent, or meeting risk-based criteria established by regulatory authority), with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls (for example, property use restrictions, activity and use limitations, institutional controls, or engineering controls). In conducting this assessment, VERTEX followed ASTM E 1527-13, as well as the U.S. Environmental Protections Agency’s All Appropriate Inquires (AAI) Final Rule of November 1, 2005 as amended December 30, 2013. Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 8.0 of the report. ASTM defines good commercial and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a parcel of commercial real estate with respect to the range of contaminants within the scope of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation Page | 33 and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. 9601) and petroleum products. As such, this practice is intended to permit a user to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on CERCLA liability. The practice constitutes "all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice" as defined at 42 U.S.C. 9601(35)(B). As part of ASTM E 1527-13, Phase I ESAs must be conducted by or under the supervision of a qualified Environmental Professional. The AAI Final Rule defines an Environmental Professional as someone who possesses sufficient specific education, training, and experience necessary to exercise professional judgment to develop opinions and conclusions regarding conditions indicative of releases or threatened releases on, at, in, or to a property, sufficient to meet the objectives and performance factors of the rule. We declare that to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in 40 CFR 312.10. We have the specific qualifications based on education, training and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the Site. We have developed and performed all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. 11.2 Detailed Scope-of-Services As part of this Phase I ESA, and in accordance with the general provisions of ASTM E 1527-13, VERTEX performed a visual reconnaissance of the site, noted use of adjoining properties, and conducted historical and regulatory records research. The following provides a more detailed description of the scope of services:  Visual inspection of the site building(s), if present, and grounds to identify potential for on- site petroleum or hazardous material release(s).  Visual inspection and categorization of the use of abutting and adjoining properties as potential off-site sources of petroleum or hazardous material contamination to the site. Page | 34  Review of readily available state and federal regulatory records related to on-site activities and to potential off-site activities to identify sources of petroleum or hazardous material contamination to the site.  Review of readily available historical information to assess for potential on-site and off-site sources of petroleum or hazardous material contamination to the site.  Review of readily available local records related to historical site ownership, usage, and development. This includes obtaining information from local environmental authorities to identify complaints, violations, citations, inspections, environmental liens, activity and use limitations (AULs), or institutional and engineering controls related to the site.  Review of readily available documents and other resources for the site and site vicinity to evaluate current and historical development and renovation activities.  Visual assessment for suspect Polychlorinated Biphenyl (PCB) containing equipment, e.g., transformers, elevators. Please note, this scope of work does not include an evaluation for or testing of suspect PCBs in building materials such as caulking, mastic/adhesives, oil-based paints, coatings and sealants. Currently, there are no regulatory requirements to test in-place building materials for the presence of PCBs. Although testing is not required for in place materials, owners are required to know the content of the waste streams that they generate and potentially sign waste profiles prior to disposal facility acceptance. Therefore, if renovation or demolition activities are to be conducted at the site that will result in the generation of demolition debris, a contractor and/or waste disposal facility may request certification of knowledge of the waste stream and/or testing to determine if the material(s) contain PCBs for proper handling and disposal purposes. VERTEX can further discuss this issue and/or provide a proposal for testing and analysis for PCBs if requested.  Visual inspection of the accessible areas of the site and review of readily available public records to assess the presence or absence of the following ASTM E 1527-13 non-scope considerations: ACMs, LBP, and radon. Page | 35  Preparation of a Phase I ESA report. 11.3 Significant Assumptions Information obtained from the Client, the Client’s representative, site representatives, individuals interviewed, and prior environmental reports is considered to be accurate unless VERTEX’s reasonable inquiries clearly revealed otherwise. Conditions observed were considered to be representative of areas that were not observed unless otherwise indicated. The primary direction of groundwater flow is assumed to follow topography, unless otherwise indicated by measurement of the potentiometric surface or other quantifiable data. VERTEX reviewed reasonably ascertainable public records with respect to past operations and ownership of the site in an attempt to determine past site usage. VERTEX is not a professional title insurance firm and makes no guarantee, express or implied, that the listing reviewed represented a comprehensive delineation of past site ownership or tenancy for legal purposes. The accuracy and completeness of information maintained in public records by public agencies or other entities is assumed to be sufficient for the purposes of this Phase I ESA, and independent verification of its validity is beyond the scope of this investigation. 11.4 Limitations and Exceptions Our professional services have been performed, our findings obtained, and our recommendations prepared in accordance with customary principles and practices in the fields of environmental science and engineering. The findings within this ESA utilized information that was practically reviewable per ASTM Practice E 1527-13, meaning that only relevant data relating to the subject site has been incorporated into the findings, disregarding extraordinary analysis of irrelevant data. The investigation conducted for this ESA was limited to data that were reasonably ascertainable, meaning that the information was publicly available, obtainable within the cost Page | 36 and time constraints under the scope of services for this project, and practically available. VERTEX is not responsible for the independent conclusions, opinions, or recommendations made by others based on the records review, site inspection, field exploration, and laboratory test data presented in this report. It should be noted that all surficial environmental assessments are inherently limited in the sense that conclusions are drawn and recommendations developed from information obtained from limited research and site evaluation. Subsurface conditions were not field investigated as part of this study and may differ from the conditions implied by the surficial observations. Additionally, the passage of time may result in a change in the environmental characteristics at this site and surrounding properties. VERTEX does not warrant against future operations or conditions, or against operations or conditions present of a type or at a location not investigated. VERTEX does not assume responsibility for other environmental issues that may be associated with the subject site. This study is not intended to assess or otherwise determine if soil contamination, waste emplacement, or groundwater contamination exists. These data are accessible only by sampling of subsurface material and groundwater through the completion of soil borings and the installation of monitoring wells and the chemical analyses of soil and groundwater samples. The scope of work, determined by the client, did not include these activities. In view of the rapidly changing status of environmental laws, regulations and guidelines, VERTEX cannot be responsible for changes in laws, regulations, or guidelines that occur after the study has been completed and that may affect the subject site. It must be noted that no investigation can absolutely rule out the existence of hazardous materials at a given site. This assessment has been based upon prior site history and observable conditions. Existing hazardous materials and contaminants can escape detection using these methods. Page | 37 Significant data gaps or accessibility limitations that would affect VERTEX’s ability to identify RECs at the site are discussed in Section 8.0. While VERTEX may comment on environmental compliance matters that fall under the scope of this assessment, this study does not constitute a regulatory compliance audit, and does not document compliance with applicable state, federal, or local regulations. 11.5 Special Terms and Conditions No special Terms and Conditions were agreed upon between the User and the Environmental Professional. 11.6 User Reliance This report is for the exclusive use of JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC, any JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC related entity acquiring an ownership interest in the site, and their lenders and equity partners with respect to the site. User reliance by the above entities shall be limited to the terms and conditions of the contract with our client under which this assessment was conducted. Except as set forth in this paragraph, no other party shall have any right to rely on any service provided by VERTEX without prior written consent. Use of this report by any other party shall be at such party’s sole risk. Page | 38 12.0 REFERENCES Agencies Contacted/Records Reviewed: City of Anaheim Fire Department City of Anaheim Building Department City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department County of Orange Health Care Agency Regional Water Quality Control Board – Santa Ana Region Orange County Assessor’s Office Orange County Recorder’s Office Prior Reports Reviewed: Phase I ESA and Limited Phase II Testing, Stadium Business Park, 1929-2035 State College Blvd. and 1500-1920 Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, California, prepared by URS Corporation Americas (URS), dated April 4, 2005 Asbestos Survey Buildings 3 and 4, Gene Autry/State College Boulevard, Anaheim, California, prepared by Hygienetics Environmental Services, Inc. (Hygienetics), dated January 3, 2008 Soils Reports, Gene Autry Experience, Anaheim, California, prepared by Southwest Inspection & Testing, Inc. (Southwest), dated July 14, 2008 Other Documents Reviewed: EDR Database Report, June 30, 2015 Aerial photographs dated 1938, 1947, 1953, 1963, 1972, 1977, 1987, 1990, 1995, 2005, 2009, 2010, and 2012 City directories dated 1966 through 2013 Topographic maps dated 1898, 1901, 1902, 1935, 1942, 1950, 1965, 1972, and 1981 Interviews: Ms. Nancy Shultz, Vice President, Investment Officer with Prologis, Inc FIGURES SCALE: 1:24,000 FIGURE NO. 1 July 2015 SITE LOCUS MAP USGS Topographic Map, 1981 Contour Interval: 5 Feet Anaheim, CA Quadrangle VERTEX Proj. No. 35044 Stadium Park1800 East Gene Autry WayAnaheim, California SITE VERTEX Proj. No. 35044 SCALE: NOT TO SCALE July 2015Stadium Park1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California SITE SCHEMATIC FIGURE NO. 2 East Gene Autry Way S o u t h S t a t e C o l l e g e B o u l e v a r d East Orangewood Avenue Building Pad Building Pad Building Pad Building PadOvergrown soil stockpile (Former Building Pad) Apartment Building (Anavia Luxury Rentals) Bank of America, (1601 E Orangewood Ave) Commercial/ Industrial(1515-1535 EOrangewood Ave) Commercial/ Industrial (1190 E Stanford Ct) George T. Hall Company Southern California Gas Company 1 9 1 1 1605 2 0 4 5 A n g e l S t a d i u m o f A n a h e i m ( 2 0 0 0 E G e n e A u t r y W a y ) C o m m e r c i a l / I n d u s t r i a l 1300 T T Overgrown soil stockpile (Former Building Pad) Crushed concrete pile(Former Building Pad) Building Pad Larger crushed concrete pile Smaller crushed asphalt (black) pile Site Boundary Asphalt-paved driveway APPENDIX A: PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION VERTEX® Photographic Documentation Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Project No. 35044 Photographs taken by Manasi Chavan on July 1, 2015 Photograph: 1 Description: Photo depicts overview of site, view towards northeast from the southwest portion of the site. Photograph: 2 Description: Photo depicts view of two pad mounted transformers noted in the central portion of the site. VERTEX® Photographic Documentation Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Project No. 35044 Photographs taken by Manasi Chavan on July 1, 2015 Photograph: 3 Description: Photo depicts view of a storm trap noted in the central portion of the site. Photograph: 4 Description: Photo depicts view of an overgrown soil mound in the southwest portion of the site. VERTEX® Photographic Documentation Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Project No. 35044 Photographs taken by Manasi Chavan on July 1, 2015 Photograph: 5 Description: Photo depicts view of an overgrown soil mound in the south-central portion of the site. Photograph: 6 Description: Photo depicts view of two crushed gravel stockpiles in the northwest portion of the site. VERTEX® Photographic Documentation Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Project No. 35044 Photographs taken by Manasi Chavan on July 1, 2015 Photograph: 7 Description: Photo depicts view of a crushed gravel mound in the north-central portion of the site. Photograph: 8 Description: Photo depicts overview of the east portion of the site, view towards south from along the north site boundary. VERTEX® Photographic Documentation Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Project No. 35044 Photographs taken by Manasi Chavan on July 1, 2015 Photograph: 9 Description: Photo depicts view of the adjacent commercial/ industrial buildings to the north of the site, view towards northwest from across East Gene Autry Way. Photograph: 10 Description: Photo depicts view of the adjacent vacant land to the north of the site, view towards northwest from across East Gene Autry Way. VERTEX® Photographic Documentation Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Project No. 35044 Photographs taken by Manasi Chavan on July 1, 2015 Photograph: 11 Description: Photo depicts view of the adjacent stadium to the east of the site, view towards east-northeast from the site. Photograph: 12 Description: Photo depicts view of the adjacent apartment building to the south of the site, view towards southeast from the site. VERTEX® Photographic Documentation Stadium Park 1800 East Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Project No. 35044 Photographs taken by Manasi Chavan on July 1, 2015 Photograph: 13 Description: Photo depicts view of the adjacent commercial/ industrial building to the south of the site, view towards southeast from the site. Photograph: 14 Description: Photo depicts view of the adjacent commercial/ industrial buildings to the west of the site, view towards west-southwest from the sidewalk along East Gene Autry Way. APPENDIX B: RELEVANT DOCUMENTS i TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION PAGE EXECUTIVE SUMMARY.................................................................................................................................... ES-1 1.0 INTRODUCTION.......................................................................................................................................... 1 Purpose............................................................................................................................................. 1 Scope of Work................................................................................................................................. 1 Deletions & Deviations.................................................................................................................... 1 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION .................................................................................................................................... 2 Legal Description............................................................................................................................. 2 Improvements................................................................................................................................... 2 Owner............................................................................................................................................... 2 Zoning.............................................................................................................................................. 3 Utilities............................................................................................................................................. 3 Current Use...................................................................................................................................... 3 3.0 REGIONAL DESCRIPTION......................................................................................................................... 5 Topography...................................................................................................................................... 5 Surface Water................................................................................................................................... 5 Floodplains....................................................................................................................................... 5 Geology/Hydrology.......................................................................................................................... 5 Oil & Gas Records........................................................................................................................... 6 Surrounding Properties..................................................................................................................... 6 4.0 SITE AND REGIONAL HISTORY .............................................................................................................. 7 Aerial Photographs........................................................................................................................... 7 Topographic Maps........................................................................................................................... 8 Sanborn Maps .................................................................................................................................. 9 Historic Site Occupants.................................................................................................................... 9 Historic Site Ownership................................................................................................................. 11 Prior Assessments .......................................................................................................................... 11 5.0 SITE INSPECTION..................................................................................................................................... 14 Date(s)............................................................................................................................................ 14 Inspector(s) .................................................................................................................................... 14 Interview(s).................................................................................................................................... 14 Interior Features............................................................................................................................. 14 Exterior Features............................................................................................................................ 14 Storm Water................................................................................................................................... 14 Material & Waste Storage.............................................................................................................. 14 Storage Tanks................................................................................................................................. 15 Wastewater Discharges.................................................................................................................. 15 Air Emissions................................................................................................................................. 15 PCBs .............................................................................................................................................. 16 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD REVIEW...................................................................................................17 6.1 Federal and State Database Review....................................................................................................... 17 Site Listings.................................................................................................................................... 17 Surrounding Property Listings ....................................................................................................... 17 6.2 Local Agency Review ........................................................................................................................... 18 CRWQCB...................................................................................................................................... 18 DTSC............................................................................................................................................. 18 AFD................................................................................................................................................ 18 ABD............................................................................................................................................... 19 OCHCA.......................................................................................................................................... 19 i 7.0 SUPPLEMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS.................................................................................................... 20 Wetlands ........................................................................................................................................ 20 Asbestos......................................................................................................................................... 20 Lead-In-Paint ................................................................................................................................. 20 Lead-In-Drinking Water................................................................................................................. 20 Radon............................................................................................................................................. 21 Mold............................................................................................................................................... 21 8.0 LIMITED PHASE II TESTING................................................................................................................... 22 Scope of Work............................................................................................................................... 22 Analytical Results .......................................................................................................................... 22 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS....................................................................................... 24 10.0 LIMITATIONS............................................................................................................................................ 25 APPENDICES Appendix A Figures Appendix B Photographic Log Appendix C EDR-Radius Map, with GeoCheckTM Report Appendix D City Directory Abstract Appendix E Laboratory Analytical Data Sheets Appendix F Information Sources Appendix G URS Corporation Qualifications Appendix H Phase One and Phase Two Opinion Letters ES-1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY URS Corporation (URS) was retained by AMB Property Corporation (AMB) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Stadium Business Park located at 1929 to 2035 S. State College Boulevard and 1500 to 1920 Gene Autry Way in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California (Site). This Phase I ESA was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E1527-00, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; and in conformance with the AMB Consultant's Service Agreement (CSA), dated May 15, 2002. Based on preliminary findings, limited Phase II testing was also performed during this ESA. The scope of work for this project included a visual inspection of the Site, performed on February 8, 2005; interviews with the Site manager; review of pertinent background and historical information; contact with appropriate regulatory agencies; prior ownership review; review of chemical and waste handling, storage, and disposal practices; observation of land use on surrounding land; review of a regulatory database report; and photographic documentation of the Site. The scope of work for the Phase II testing consisted of advancing borings for the collection of soil samples to evaluate selected areas of the Site. The Site consists of approximately 17.59 acres of relatively flat land improved with nine concrete- tilt-up structures with approximately 282,492 total square feet. The nine Site buildings consist of five warehouse buildings, three multi-tenant office/warehouse buildings, and one restaurant building. Information obtained during this ESA indicates that the Site buildings were constructed between 1975 and 1976. The remainder of the Site is entirely developed, with concrete and asphalt-paved access, parking and loading areas, and perimeter landscaping. The Site is currently occupied by 25 tenants, and there are no vacancies. Current Site uses consist of offices, warehouse storage and distribution, light industrial, and retail uses. According to a previous ESA and information obtained during this ESA, prior to development in the mid-1970’s, the Site was primarily used for agricultural purposes, and was possibly occupied with several small residential structures. According to information obtained during this ESA, the Site has been owned by multiple property management companies since development, and has been occupied by multiple tenants that have had uses similar to the current tenants. Based on the findings of this ESA, URS has identified the following RECs for the Site. · Motor oil impacted soil was reportedly removed from the southeastern corner of the Site in 1986. The oil reportedly originated from a former World Moving and Storage, Inc. facility located southeast of the Site. No record of the release or cleanup was contained in agency files for the Site address. · Regulatory databases reviewed during this ESA identified that a sewage release occurred on the Site in 1998. While details regarding the sewage release were not available, based on the absence of required follow up actions, the issue is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site. ES-1 To investigate the potential for impacts associated with the past use of the Site, limited phase II soil testing was performed to screen soils for 1) the potential presence of residual industrial constituents related to the motor oil release in the southeastern corner of the site; 2) the former railroad spur on the southern portion of the Site; and 3) the potential presence of residual agricultural chemicals from historic use of the Site for agricultural purposes prior to its current development. The results of the Phase II testing did not identify industrial constituents above published regulatory criteria for a residential use. A summary of the Phase II results is provided below: Testing conducted in the southeastern corner of the site to screen soils for residual impact from the motor oil release did not identify constituents above residential standards. Based upon the results of the testing, the reported removal of the impacted soil from this area, and a lack of follow up actions by regulatory agencies, the motor oil release is unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the site. Testing conducted along the former rail spur did not identify industrial constituents above published residential standards. Based upon the results of the testing, and the removal of the rail spur, the former rail area is unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the site. Screening of site soils for residual impact from historic agricultural use did not identify pesticides above residential standards. Arsenic was detected in one sample above at a concentration slightly above the laboratory detection limit, but at a concentration considered naturally occurring for California soils. Subsequent re-analysis of the sample by the laboratory did not detect arsenic. Based upon the results of the testing, historic agricultural use is unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the Site. Executive Summary is presented for convenience only and should not be used in lieu of the information presented in the entire report. - 1 - 1.0 INTRODUCTION URS Corporation Americas (URS) was retained by AMB Property Corporation (AMB) to conduct a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) of the Stadium Business Park located at 1929 to 2035 S. State College Boulevard and 1500 to 1920 E. Gene Autry Way in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California (Site). The Phase I ESA was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) Standard Practice E1527- 00, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process; and in conformance with the AMB Consultant's Service Agreement (CSA), dated May 15, 2002. Based on preliminary findings, limited Phase II testing was also performed during this ESA. The purpose of this report is to identify recognized environmental conditions (RECs) in connection with the Site. The ASTM Standard Practice E1527-00 defines RECs as the following: The presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products on a property under conditions that indicate an existing release, a past release, or a material threat of a release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products into structures of the property or into the ground, groundwater, or surface water of the property. The term includes hazardous substances or petroleum products even under conditions in compliance with laws. The term is not intended to include de minimis conditions that generally do not present a material risk of harm to public health or the environment and that generally would not be the subject of an enforcement action if brought to the attention of appropriate governmental agencies. The scope of work for this project included a visual inspection of the Site, performed on February 8, 2005; interviews with the Site manager; review of pertinent background and historical information; contact with appropriate regulatory agencies; prior ownership review; review of chemical and waste handling, storage, and disposal practices; observation of land use on surrounding land; review of a regulatory database report; and photographic documentation of the Site. The scope of work for the Phase II testing consisted of advancing 12 borings for collection of soil samples on the southern portion of the Site. It was the intent of this Phase I ESA to make all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good commercial or customary practice. Furthermore, it was the intent of this document to permit AMB to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner defense to CERCLA liability. This Phase I ESA did not deviate from general requirements set forth in the ASTM Standard Practice E1527-00. Purpose Scope of Work Deletions & Deviations - 2 - 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION Site description information was obtained from various sources during this ESA. The location of the Site is shown in Appendix A (Figure 1: Site Location Map and Figure 2: Site Layout Map). Photographic documentation is presented in Appendix B. The Site is located at 1929 to 2035 S. State College Boulevard and 1500 to 1920 E. Gene Autry Way in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. The Site comprises approximately 17.59 acres of land, and is identified by the Assessor’s Parcel Number 083-290-88. The Site is located at an approximate Latitude North 33.798800, and Longitude West 117.890600. According to information provided by AMB, the Site is improved with nine single-story, concrete tilt-up buildings constructed on concrete slab-on-grade foundations that total approximately 282,492 square feet. Information obtained during this ESA indicates the Site buildings were constructed between 1975 and 1976. Building-specific information, addresses, construction history, and square footage information, is presented below. All construction dates were obtained from a file review with the City of Anaheim Building Department. BLDG ADDRESSES CONSTRUCTION ACTIVITIES TOTAL SQUARE FOOTAGE 1 1929 & 1939 State College Blvd. New shell 1977 Restaurant interior 1978 14,700 2 1949 State College Blvd. N/A 3,720 3 1969, 1971, 1973, 1975, 1979, 1983, 1985, & 1987 State College Blvd. N/A 11,680 4 2009, 2011, 2013, 2017, 2019, 2021, 2025, 2027, 2029, 2031, 2033, & 2035 State College Blvd. Warehouse shell 1976 18,792 5 1800, 1860 & 1880 E. Gene Autry Way Warehouse Shell Only 1976 64,000 6 1620 & 1680 E. Gene Autry Way Warehouse Shell Only 1976 64,000 7 1500 & 1520 E. Gene Autry Way Warehouse Shell Only 1976 22,400 8 1700, 1720, 1740, 1760, 1780, & 1790 E. Gene Autry Way Warehouse Shell Only 1976 60,800 9 1900 to 1920 E. Gene Autry Way N/A 22,400 N/A = Not available in files reviewed. The Site is currently owned by AMB Property Corporation. Legal Description Improvements Owner - 3 - According to the City of Anaheim Planning and Zoning Department (APZD), the Site is zoned for industrial uses, which can include multi-story office buildings. Utilities provided to the Site include natural gas, electricity, public drinking water, and sanitary sewer services. Natural gas is supplied by The Gas Company. Electricity, water, and sewer services are provided by the Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD). According to the APUD, approximately 40 percent of the water supply comes from city-owned and operated water wells and 30 percent comes from surface water sources. The remaining water supply is purchased from the Metropolitan Water District’s Eastern Colorado River Aqueduct and Northern California water supply. The Site is currently used for warehouse storage and distribution, light industrial, office administrative purposes, and a restaurant. During the February 8, 2005 Site reconnaissance, URS personnel observed the following Site occupants. BLDG STREET ADDRESS TENANT SITE USE 1 1929 State College Blvd. The Catch Restaurant Restaurant. Tenant since 2002. 1 1939 State College Blvd. The Diamond Court Private banquet hall. 2 1949 State College Blvd Kimbel Austin Taylor Custom wardrobe design. Tenant for 5 years. 3 1969, 1971, 1973, 1975 State College Blvd. Premier Plus Financial Services (formerly Seabreeze Mortgage Services) Offices. Tenant at Site since 1998. 3 1979 & 1983 State College Blvd. ETAC Environmental Training Classrooms. 3 1985 & 1987 State College Blvd. Primerica Financial offices. 4 2009 State College Blvd. Ticket Outlet Ticket sales office 4 2011 State College Blvd. Corniche Travel Travel agency office 4 2013, 2017, & 2019 State College Blvd. Le Gourmet Kitchen Kitchen showroom, offices, and warehouse 4 2021 State College Blvd. Sewing Machine Exchange Sewing machine sales and maintenance shop 4 2025 & 2027 State College Blvd. McDonald & Associates Offices 4 2029 & 2031 State College Blvd. Pacific Shutters Shutter assembly, painting and storage. 4 2033 & 2035 State College Blvd. The Graphics Department Business printing 7 1500 E. Gene Autry Way R.S. Hughes Safety supplies distributor Zoning Utilities Current Use - 4 - BLDG STREET ADDRESS TENANT SITE USE 7 1520 E. Gene Autry Way Door Tech Garage door sales. Tenant since 2001. 6 1620 to 1680 E. Gene Autry Way Trimark Sportswear Wholesale clothing distributor. No manufacturing 8 1700 E. Gene Autry Way Smalley & Co. Sealings/Coatings adhesive distributor 8 1720 E. Gene Autry Way Contractor’s Wire & Cable Wire distributor 8 1740 E. Gene Autry Way Optima Cottonwear T-shirt storage and sales. 8 1760 E. Gene Autry Way Advantage Sales & Marketing Food storage and distributor 8 1780 E. Gene Autry Way Adex USA Ceramic tile distributor 8 1790 E. Gene Autry Way Mesa Distributors, Inc. Embroidery machine sales 5 1800, 1860 & 1880 E. Gene Autry Way NBTY Manufacturing West Nutritional supplement manufacturing. 9 1900 E. Gene Autry Way OPA International Ceramic tile distributor. 9 1920 E. Gene Autry Way Sericol Screen printing ink distributor - 5 - 3.0 REGIONAL DESCRIPTION Regional information was obtained from sources listed below and in Section 10 of this report, and from observations obtained during the Site reconnaissance. Topographic map coverage of the Site is provided by the United States Geological Survey (USGS), Anaheim Quadrangle, California 7.5 minute quadrangle map dated 1965 and photo-revised in 1981. The elevation of the property is approximately 145 feet above mean sea level (MSL), and slopes gradually to the south. According to the Anaheim Quadrangle topographic map, the nearest surface water body to the Site is the Santa Ana River located approximately one-half mile east of the Site. No surface waters were observed on the Site. According to the APZD, the Site lies within Flood Hazard Zone X, which is designated as an area located outside a 500-year flood hazard area, on Flood Insurance Rate Map, Panel No. 06059C01428, dated February 18, 2004. The Site is located in the southern portion of the Transverse Ranges of southern California in the Los Angeles Basin. This subject area is located within the central block portion of the Los Angeles Basin, which consists of a broad coastal plain. The subject property is located north of the Huntington Mesa in a relatively flat coastal plain that gently dips to the southwest toward the Pacific Ocean. According to California Division of Mines and Geology maps, the Site is underlain by Quaternary (recent) alluvium deposited on Pleistocene through Late Cretaceous marine and non-marine clastic sedimentary rocks. There are no exposed native soils at the Site. This general area is structurally complex with a series of northerly plunging folds and northwest trending faults both onshore and offshore, primarily from the Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone. According to the APZD, neither the Site, nor any site within the City of Anaheim, is located within a fault ruptured hazard zone, as defined in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The soils in the Site vicinity are mapped as well drained nearly level soils on alluvial fans and flood plains in the Metz Series mapping unit, by the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) Soil Conservation Service. This soil is described as light brown, loamy sand with fine sand and silt layers to approximately 10 inches below ground surface. Subsoils are described as a very pale brown, loamy sand, sandy loam and very fine sandy loam to a depth of 63 inches or more. According to the USDA Soil Survey Report of Orange County and Western Part of Riverside County, California (1978), these soils are used principally for row crops, field crops, and urban development. Based on the previous site assessment report, subsurface soils generally consist of grey silts, Topography Floodplains Geology / Hydrology Surface Water - 6 - sands and gravel to a maximum depth of 125 feet, the maximum depth explored in soil borings drilled by others. Based on the groundwater maps of the Orange County Water District, first encountered groundwater beneath the Site occurs at approximately 50 feet bgs, and flows to the south. First groundwater is not typically used for production purposes. According to the 2003 Munger Map Book (map page W-65), there are no permitted oil or gas wells on the Site or within a one-half mile radius. The nearest oil wells to the Site exist approximately 4 miles to the north in the East and West Coyote Hills Oil Fields. These wells are not unlikely to adversely affect the Site under a commercial industrial setting. The immediate vicinity of the Site includes primarily commercial and industrial properties. URS observed the following uses during the Site reconnaissance. North: The Site is bordered to the north by E. Gene Autry Way, followed by mixed commercial and industrial buildings including The Gas Company (Southern California Edison) and the Gene Autry Business Park, a multi-tenant center that includes retail, administrative offices, and industrial uses. South: The Site is bordered to the south by vacant land formerly occupied by railroad tracks followed by an industrial building. East: The Site is bordered to the east by S. State College Boulevard, followed by Anaheim Stadium parking lots. West: The Site is bordered to the west by commercial and industrial uses, including Marine Depot, Airtronics, and the Southwest Trading Tile Co. No specific environmental concerns were noted for adjacent properties inspected by URS from the public right-of-way. Discussions regarding off-site environmental conditions are presented in Section 6.0 of this report. Oil & Gas Records Surrounding Properties - 7 - 4.0 SITE AND REGIONAL HISTORY URS reviewed aerial photographs of the Site and surrounding areas to determine past land uses. The aerial photographs were obtained from EDR. The photographs reviewed included the years 1938, 1947, 1953, 1968, 1977, 1989, 1994, and 2002. Information obtained from the aerial photographs is summarized as follows. 1938 – The 1938 aerial photograph depicts the Site as occupied with orchard crops with no structures. Adjacent sites and the surrounding area consist of orchard crops with occasional small structures that appear to be residences or farming related buildings. State College Boulevard appears to be a dirt road at this time and the Santa Ana Freeway is a two-lane road. The unlined Santa Ana River bed is seen approximately one-quarter mile to the east of the Site. 1947 – The 1947 aerial photograph depicts the Site as being utilized as agricultural land with what appears to be row crops on the east and orchards on the west. There are several small structures, most likely residences or barns, seen onsite near the southwestern corner of the Site. The adjacent properties and surrounding area appear as they did in the previous photograph. 1953 – The 1953 aerial photograph depicts the Site as being utilized as agricultural land with row crops and no structures. A north/south trending dirt road bisects the Site and leads to where the small structures were seen in the previous photograph. The adjacent sites and surrounding areas are occupied with orchards or row crops with an increase in residential development to the south. 1968 – The 1968 aerial photograph depicts the Site as undeveloped, graded land without any roadways, crops, structures or specific Site features. The adjacent properties to the northeast and southeast of the Site (along State College Boulevard) are now occupied with large commercial or industrial structures. A small road exists where Gene Autry Way is currently located. Some large industrial or commercial structures are now seen in the surrounding area, but the area is mostly still occupied with agricultural uses. State College Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Orangewood Avenue, and the Santa Ana Freeway are in place at this time. 1977 – In the 1977 aerial photograph, the Site is developed with what appears to be the current structures, except buildings 1 and 2, located at the northeastern corner of the Site, appear to be under construction at this time. The immediately adjacent properties appear as they did in the previous photograph, although there is a significant increase in development (commercial, industrial, and residential) in the surrounding area. Anaheim Stadium is now located to the east. All of the current roadways appear to be in place. Aerial Photographs - 8 - 1989, 1994 & 2002 – The 1989, 1994 and 2002 aerial photographs depict the Site as it exists today. Surrounding properties are entirely developed except for the adjacent property to the southeast, which is currently vacant. The 2002 photograph depicts the Santa Ana Freeway as expanded and under construction in some areas. Based on URS’ review of aerial photographs, and information presented in subsequent sections of this report, the Site appears to have been used primarily for agricultural purposes until initial development in the mid-1970’s. Some small structures, which were most likely residences, were observed along the southern property line in the 1947 aerial photograph. Historic use of the Site for agricultural purposes was identified as a potential environmental concern in that residual agricultural chemicals could exist in Site soils. This potential environmental concern was evaluated during Phase II testing performed during this ESA, as summarized in Section 8.0. URS reviewed historic topographic maps of the Site and surrounding areas to determine past land uses. The topographic maps were obtained from EDR. The topographic maps available for review included the years 1898, 1902, 1935, 1950, 1965, 1972, and 1981. Information obtained from the topographic map review is summarized below. 1898 & 1902 – The 1898 and 1902 topographic maps depict the Site and all adjacent properties as undeveloped without structures. The scale of the maps does not allow for details of the Site or adjacent sites. The Southern California Railroad and the Southern Pacific Railroad are located to the west, south, and northwest. The Santa Ana Freeway is not in place. The Santa Ana River is depicted as an unlined, naturally occurring river directly east of the Site. 1935 & 1950 – In the 1935 & 1950 topographic maps, the Site and all adjacent properties are depicted as undeveloped. The surrounding areas in all directions are depicted as undeveloped with occasional small structures, most likely residences. County Hospital is depicted as a farm and hospital to the south. Although smaller than current, most of the major roads are in place, including Ball Road, Katella Avenue, Orangewood Avenue, Chapman Avenue, and State College Boulevard (depicted as Placentia Avenue at this time.) The Santa Ana Freeway is depicted as Santa Ana Boulevard in both maps and is depicted as having four lanes in 1950. The Santa Ana River is depicted as a controlled, lined levee. 1965 – The 1965 topographic map depicts the Site as undeveloped without structures. Adjacent properties along State College Boulevard to the north and south are depicted with large commercial or industrial structures. The remaining immediately adjacent properties remain undeveloped. An unnamed roadway is now depicted along the northern property line (where Gene Autry Way currently exists) that extends west from State College Boulevard to an adjacent orchard. Orchards are depicted in the surrounding area, especially to the north and Topographic Maps - 9 - northeast. There is a significant increase in development in the surrounding area, as well, including the Anaheim Stadium across State College Boulevard to the east, Disneyland and commercial structures to the north and northeast, and residential developments to the west and southwest. The Santa Ana (5) Freeway has expanded and is depicted with six lanes. 1972 – The 1972 topographic map depicts the Site as undeveloped without structures. Adjacent properties appear as they did in the previous map, except the adjacent orchard is no longer seen. Orchards are no longer depicted in the surrounding area. There is a slight increase in development, mostly consisting of some large structures to the north and south in areas where orchards were previously located. 1981 – The 1981 topographic map depicts the Site as developed with the current nine structures. Gene Autry Way is in place, as are all the current roadways, including the smaller roads to the north (Chris Lane, Talbot Way, and Betmor Lane), which are depicted with commercial or industrial developments surrounding them. Increased commercial or industrial development is depicted in the surrounding area, especially to the north, extending to Ball Road. No specific RECs were identified in the topographic maps reviewed. URS contacted the EDR library to determine if Sanborn Fire Insurance Maps are available for the area of the Site. Sanborn maps show the location of underground storage tanks (USTs), location of underground pipelines, and types of buildings and industrial activities on properties. According to EDR, there are no Sanborn maps available for the Site. URS obtained a City Directory Abstract from EDR for the Site addresses on E. Gene Autry Way and for addresses on surrounding streets, including S. State College Boulevard. The City Directory Abstract is a review of business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories, if available, at approximately five-year intervals for the years spanning between 1920 through 2002. Sanborn Maps Historic Site Occupants Directories - 10 - According to EDR, E. Gene Autry Way was not listed in the 1920 through 1992 directories. The 1995 directory was the first reviewed city directory that listed E. Gene Autry Way. The Site addresses on E. Gene Autry Way that were listed in the reviewed directories are included in the following table. According to EDR, S. State College Boulevard was not listed in the 1920 through 1965 directories. According to EDR, the 1966 directory was the first reviewed city directory that listed S. State College Boulevard, but it did not include any of the Site addresses. The 1980 directory was the first reviewed directory that listed Site addresses on S. State College Boulevard. The Site addresses on S. State College Boulevard that were listed in the EDR City Directory Abstract are included in the following table. Since the EDR review did not include any addresses in the 1900 block, there are no listings for Site addresses between 1929 through 1987 State College Boulevard (Buildings 1, 2, and 3). No other pertinent information was presented in the City Directory Abstract, a copy of which is included in Appendix D. BLDG SITE ADDRESS DIRECTORY TENANTS 6 1680 E. Gene Autry Way 1995 Horizon Carpet Mills 8 1700 E. Gene Autry Way 1995, 2001 Smalley & Company 8 1720 E. Gene Autry Way 1995 Ebbert Comfrrep 8 1720 E. Gene Autry Way 2001 A Contractors 8 1740 E. Gene Autry Way 2001 Optima Cottonwear 8 1760 E. Gene Autry Way 1995 LA Outbound 8 1760 E. Gene Autry Way 1995 Nationwide Transportation 8 1760 E. Gene Autry Way 1995 Tau Ceramics Inc. 8 1760 E. Gene Autry Way 2001 Contract 8 1790 E. Gene Autry Way 1995 Glantz N & Son 5 1880 E. Gene Autry Way 1995 Compac Microelectronics 9 1920 E. Gene Autry Way 2001 Sericol Inc. (1920). 4 2009 S. State College 1980 Anaheim Stadium Office 4 2009 S. State College 1980 PSC 4 2009 S. State College 1986, 1991 Super Fan Sport Shop 4 2009 S. State College 1991, 2001 The Ticket Outlet 4 2013 S. State College 1986 Minute Man Press of Anaheim 4 2013 S. State College 1991 American Speedy Printing Centers 4 2015 S. State College 2001 Gourmet Kitchen 4 2017 S. State College 1980 AJLL WT S Dolivan@Santa Ana, Complete Reproduction Service, and VTOW 4 2017 S. State College 1991 Architectural Tile & Granite 4 2019 S. State College 1986 Mission Mexican Food Products 4 2021 S. State College 1980 Creative Lighting & Maintenance 4 2021 S. State College 1991 A&M Marble - 11 - 4 2023 S. State College 1986 Audio Visual Orange County Corporate 4 2025 S. State College 1980 Speedy Business Cards 4 2025 S. State College 1986 Asbestos & Asbestos, Commercial Building Supply, Prefinished Wall Board Co. 4 2025 S. State College 1991 West Coast Ceramic Tile Distributors 4 2027 S. State College 1980 CBS LTD Landscape 4 2029 S. State College 1980 I 4 2029 S. State College 1986 KDS Marketing 4 2029 S. State College 1991 California Remodeling, From Anaheim Telephones Call 4 2031 S. State College 1991 A1 Anderson Mortgage Lending 4 2033 S. State College 1986 Jack Wade Productions 4 2035 S. State College 1980 Giori Cement Company 4 2035 S. State College 1986 Stadium Business Parks According to a prior assessment document reviewed for this report that included the review of a 50-year chain-of-title report, the Site was mainly owned by private individuals in the 1940’s and 1950’s; however an easement was granted to Atchison, Topeka, and Santa Fe Railway Company in July 1958. In 1960, the Site or portions of the Site changed ownership between various individuals from the City of Anaheim and the Orangewood Development Company. Other owners in the 1960’s included various individuals, Malibu Shore Properties, GANCO and FANCO Corporations, and the Incentive Aid Foundation. Company ownership of the Site during the 1970’s included Pacific World, Golden West Equity Properties, Inc., and the Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Company, which received an easement. In 1981, Equitec 80 Real Estate Investors owned a portion of the Site. And in 1989, Stadium Business Park South was indicated as an owner. No other historic Site ownership information was presented in the previous ESA. According to the Site manager, AMB Property Corporation purchased the Site in 1994 or 1995. During this ESA, the following prior assessment document was reviewed: · Dames & Moore (D&M), Report Phase I Environmental Site Assessment, Stadium Business Park South, State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, California, July 15, 1994. The D&M ESA is an ASTM standard report that did not include any sampling. The prior assessment document primarily addresses environmental features and conditions related to former use of hazardous materials. D&M concluded, Based Historic Site Ownership Prior Assessment(s) - 12 - on the scope of services performed for this ESA, evidence was not found to suggest that the site has been affected by the improper use, storage, or disposal of hazardous materials from onsite sources. Some evidence was found suggesting a low to moderate potential that groundwater onsite may have been impacted by offsite sources. According to D&M, no tenant activities or other sources of contamination were observed that appeared to have the potential of contaminating the Site. D&M stated that the historical data reviewed during the ESA did not indicate past commercial or industrial operations on the Site that had a significant potential to affect onsite environmental conditions. According to D&M, because of the past agricultural activities on the Site, the potential may exist for the presence of pesticide or herbicide residues in the onsite soil, but D&M stated that these substances do not warrant further investigation because site development probably affected the distribution of such residues and the potential for exposure is reduced by the presence of buildings and pavement at the Site. As indicated in Section 8.0 of this report, soil testing was performed during this ESA to evaluate the potential for residual pesticides in Site soils. Based on the date of construction of the onsite buildings (1975 through 1976), D&M noted the potential exists that asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) were used during the construction of the onsite structures and that these ACMs may still be present onsite. D&M recommended an asbestos survey of the Site. According to D&M, a review of a regulatory database search did not identify any onsite facilities with known soil or groundwater contaminations, but did identify one onsite business as a generator of small quantities of hazardous waste. The database also indicated four hazardous waste sites located between ½ and one mile of the Site, and 22 LUST sites located within one mile of the Site. Three of these LUST sites were located within ¼ mile of the Site, and one was located up- gradient or cross-gradient from the Site. Based on the findings in the database search and their status at that time, D&M concluded there was a low to moderate potential for one or more of these sites to impact the subject property because of their distance and Hydrogeologic position relative to the property. As summarized in Section 6.0 of this report, no significant off-site environmental concerns were identified during this ESA. According to D&M, information from the Orange County Water District indicated volatile organic hydrocarbons were not found in two water wells located up- gradient from the Site. Down-gradient groundwater samples collected from a well located approximately ¼-mile south of the Site found trace concentrations of trichlorofluoromethane and trichlorotrifluoroethane. D&M concluded, There is the potential that groundwater beneath the site may be impacted, though based on information reviewed for this report, evidence was not found that groundwater beneath the site has been impacted by onsite sources. D&M did not recommend - 13 - any further assessment. As summarized in Section 6.0 of this report, no significant off-site environmental concerns were identified during this ESA. Finally, the property owner informed D&M that in 1986 motor oil contaminated soil was removed from a railroad siding formerly located in the southeastern corner of the Site. The railroad track reportedly spanned the length of the southern end of the property boundary, in the current vacant land area. According to D&M, the oil originated from a former World Moving and Storage, Inc. facility located southeast of the Site. D&M concluded, Even though no agency closure documents have been reviewed, it appears that the soil contamination was cleaned up and that the potential for a significant impairment of the subject property by contamination along the railroad tracks is low. As a follow up to this issue, URS inspected the site and reviewed files at the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) in 2003. The OCHCA responded that no files were available for the Site addresses, and no evidence of a release in the area was observable during URS’ inspection. The railroad tracks were not present during URS’ 2003 assessment. Based on the observed removal of the railroad tracks, absence of required follow up actions by the OCHCA, and relatively low risk posed by waste oil, URS concluded that the issue is unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the Site. As a conservative measure, during this ESA URS screened soil samples in this area of the Site for petroleum hydrocarbons, as summarized in Section 8.0. No evidence of impact was identified. Based on the results of the field screening, no adverse environmental conditions requiring regulatory action were identified. - 14 - 5.0 SITE INSPECTION URS inspected accessible interior and exterior portions of the Site for evidence of RECs. This included features listed in ASTM Standard Practice E1527-00, but is subject to limitations specified in this report, and the ASTM Standard. February 8, 2005. Mr. Kevin Sheridan. Ms. Sandy Diaz of AMB Property Corporation and a tenant representative from each business were interviewed for this ESA. Ms. Diaz was unaware of any environmental concerns associated with the Site and identified four Site tenants that use or store hazardous materials or wastes. The Site buildings are concrete tilt-up structures with concrete slab-on-grade concrete foundations and steel columns supporting laminated wood beams and plywood deck roofs, covered by built-up roof systems. The buildings typically contained office areas with gypsum wallboard, drop ceilings, carpet, and vinyl- tiled floors. Interior lighting consisted of fluorescent and incandescent lights, and skylights. The Site buildings are surrounded by concrete walkways and aprons, asphalt driveways, and parking areas. The Site is accessed from E. Gene Autry Way and S. State College Boulevard. Landscaping exists along the adjacent roads and along the property boundaries, as well as in planters along the perimeters of the buildings and throughout the parking lots. The landscaping was observed to be in good condition. There is a long, narrow strip of undeveloped land along the Site’s southern border where railroad tracks have been removed. No stained soils, stressed vegetation, unusual odors, pits, ponds, or lagoons were noted at the Site. Storm water runoff is diverted by concrete swales and captured by catch basins in the parking areas and then into storm drains located onsite and in the adjacent roadways. No significant staining or evidence of a release was observed in the vicinity of the storm drains, catch basins or drainage troughs. Solid wastes generated at the Site include cardboard and general office wastes. The following hazardous materials and wastes, or specialized materials were observed during URS’ Site reconnaissance. · Smalley & Company (Smalley), an adhesive distributor, stores small quantities of hazardous chemicals used for cleaning up adhesives onsite, including Toluene, MEK, xylene, and alcohol. These chemicals are stored in Date(s) Inspector(s) Interview(s) Interior Features Exterior Features Storm Water Material & Waste Storage - 15 - their original retail containers in sizes 5-gallons or less. No spill containment or spill kits were observed at this location. Several years ago an illegal waste disposal was made in the rear dumpster by a Smalley client, which was removed and disposed of properly by Smalley, as reported in the EDR database listing. This tenant does not generate hazardous waste. · RS Hughes, a safety materials supplier, stores small quantities of hazardous chemicals including lubricants, adhesives and other retail products, which are stored in their original retail containers in sizes of 5-gallons or less. No spill containment was observed at this location. This tenant does not generate hazardous waste. · NBTY Manufacturing stores small quantities of hazardous chemicals used for producing nutritional supplements, including oils, lubricants, lab chemicals and cleaners. These chemicals are stored in their original retail containers in sizes of 5-gallons or less. Spill containment and spill kits were observed at this location. This tenant generates two types of hazardous waste, waste oil one to two 55-gallon drums per quarter, and waste lab chemicals (miscellaneous organics), one to two 55-gallon drums per year. · Sericol, an ink distributor, stores hazardous chemicals used for printing and cleaning up inks, including solvent and water-based inks. These chemicals are stored in their original retail containers in sizes of 5-gallons or less. No spill containment was observed at this location. This tenant generates hazardous waste, one to two 55-gallon drums per quarter, from used solvent-based inks. Material and waste storage appeared adequate, and no evidence of significant releases was observed during the Site reconnaissance. As a best management practice, URS recommends that all hazardous materials and hazardous waste be located in designated areas with secondary containment. Visual evidence of USTs or ASTs was not observed on the Site during the Site reconnaissance. In addition, no evidence of historic USTs or ASTs was found during agency file reviews performed for this ESA. Wastewater discharges from the Site are to the sanitary sewer from the bathroom facilities and sinks. Other discharges to water by tenant-related activities were not identified at the Site during this ESA. Point sources of air emissions were not identified from current operations at the Site with the exception of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC) exhausts. This Site does not fall under regulation by Title V of the Clean Air Act Amendments, which applies to facilities that are considered major sources. Storage Tanks Wastewater Discharges Air Emissions - 16 - Five pad-mounted electrical transformers were observed on the Site. No label was affixed to the transformers indicating whether they contained polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). The transformers were in good condition with no signs of leakage. These transformers are owned and maintained by the City of Anaheim, Public Utilities Department (APUD). According to a previous ESA , the APUD has tested these transformers and none of them were found to contain PCBs. Additionally, should a release of the transformers’ contents occur, the owner of the units must assume liability. URS foresees no financial liability to the Site owner with regard to this issue unless the property owner(s) cause a release due to gross negligence or willful act. PCBs - 17 - 6.0 ENVIRONMENTAL RECORD REVIEW 6.1 Federal and State Database Review URS retained EDR to provide a database search of federal and state environmental records. Specific databases searched and the search radius for each is identified in the EDR report. A copy of EDR’s report and search radius map is included in Appendix C. The database report was reviewed to note reported releases in the vicinity of the Site that are known to have or are expected to result in an environmental condition that could adversely impact the Site. Reported release sites listed in the regulatory agency database search report were evaluated with respect to the nature and extent of a given release, the distance of the reported release from the Site, and the position of a reported release with respect to known or expected local and/or regional groundwater flow direction (south, see Section 3.0). Generally, reported release sites located within 0.5 mile up-gradient, 0.25 mile cross- gradient, or adjacent down-gradient were considered to have a potential to impact the Site, and are discussed below. Properties that were listed in the database search report, but were not identified as a release site (for example, a site listed as a hazardous waste generator but not as having had a release) were not considered to have a potential to impact the Site. Any non-release sites identified adjacent to the Site are not discussed. Unless indicated, information that unmapped or orphan facilities identified in the EDR report would adversely affect the Site was not identified. A review of the EDR database report indicated that there are four Site addresses listed on the HAZNET database. The Site listings include D&F Industries and NBTY Manufacturing at 1800 E. Gene Autry Way. D&F Industries is listed for disposal of oxygenated solvents, inorganic solvent mixture waste. NBTY Manufacturing is listed for disposal of solvent mixture waste. Smalley & Co is listed at 1700 E. Gene Autry Way for disposal of organics. Sericol is listed at 1920 E. Gene Autry Way for disposal of liquid organic mix. Finally, Microplex Inc. is listed at 1977 S. State College Boulevard for disposal of organics and solvents. No violations are reported for any of the Site listings, and the listings are consistent with historic industrial use of the Site. The 2035 S. State College Boulevard address is listed on the CHMIRS database. This listing, dated June 25, 1998, is listed as a “raw sewage break” with no company or party listed. While details regarding the sewage release was not available, based on the absence of required follow up actions, the issue is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site. The EDR report identified two RCRIS-SQG, two UST sites, and seven Haznet facilities adjacent to the Site property boundaries. These listings are consistent with industrial use of the area, and no violations were identified in the databases. The following surrounding properties were identified as release facilities on the EDR report within the evaluation criteria described previously. Site Listings Surrounding Property Listings - 18 - SITE/LOCATIONDATABA SE DISTANCE / DIRECTION * COMMENTS Arco #6220 1801 State College Blvd. LUST Cortese <1/4-mile / North- Northeast (up- gradient) Soil only case closed in 1994. Centron Corp. 1701 State College Blvd. LUST Cortese <1/4-mile / North (up-gradient) Undefined case closed in 1986. Stadium Motors 2225 Katella Avenue RCRA- SQG FINDS LUST Cortese 1/4-mile / North- Northeast (up- gradient) Soil only case closed in 1991. Starwood 2099 State College Blvd. LUST UST <1/4-mile / North- Northeast (up- gradient) Soil only case closed in 2002. Undefined case closed in 2003. Arco #6220 1801 State College Blvd. LUST Cortese <1/4-mile / South- Southeast (cross- gradient) Soil only case closed in 1989. * Distance and direction are approximate. Based on URS’ review of the databases and application of the evaluation criteria described previously, release facilities with significant potential to have impacted the Site were not identified in the EDR report, and no further assessment is warranted. 6.2 Local Agency Review In addition to the database list search, URS contacted state and local regulatory agencies to obtain information regarding the environmental condition of the Site. The following information was received from these agencies: URS requested a file review with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (CRWQCB) at their Riverside office via facsimile on February 3, 2005. The CRWQCB responded via telephone on February 3, 2005, and indicated that they had no files for the Site addresses. URS requested a file review with the California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) via facsimile on February 3, 2005. According to the February 8, 2005 written response from this agency, they have no records for the Site addresses in their files. URS conducted a file review at the City of Anaheim Fire Department (AFD), the CUPA, on February 8, 2005. The AFD files for the Site addresses included the following: CRWQCB AFD DTSC - 19 - · Sericol Inc. at 1920 E. Gene Autry Way. Inks/solvent storage is recorded at this address dating back to 1998. Sericol is recorded as having approximately 275 gallons of waste per year, which consists of inks. According to the reviewed files, Sericol was fined in 2000 during a routine inspection for having an open waste drum. · NBTY at 1800 E. Gene Autry Way. Only routine inspections were included in the files for this address, which date back to 1995 (formerly D&F Industries). According to the reviewed files, NBTY wastes consist of waste oil, lab solvents, and compressed gases. · West Bond, Inc. at 1551 E. Gene Autry Way. West Bond Inc. is recorded as generating 250 gallons of waste oil per year from 1980 through 1992. · Smalley & Co. at 1700 E. Gene Autry Way. Smalley & Co is recorded as having a minor chemical storage complaint in 2001 based on an open container, which was rectified. · RS Hughes Inc. at 1500 E. Gene Autry Way. RS Hughes, Inc. is recorded as an industrial distributor with onsite hazardous materials storage, including toluene, MEK, petroleum distiller, and hexane. The file for this address ends in 2001. · Mohawk Carpet at 1680 Gene Autry Way. Mohawk is recorded as storing propane in 1994. · The Catch Restaurant at 1929 State College Boulevard. The AFD file indicates the Catch Restaurant was questioned about flame retardant materials. No hazardous materials were disclosed. The information obtained from review of the AFD files is consistent with historic use of the Site and no specific environmental concerns were identified. URS conducted a file review at the City of Anaheim Building Department (ABD) on February 8, 2005. The ABD files contained various permits for initial development and tenant improvements at the Site. Information obtained from the ABD file review is included in the table on page 2. URS submitted a request with the Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) to review their files for the Site addresses. The OCHCA response to URS’ file request has not been received. An addendum to this report will be prepared if information obtained from OCHCA alters the conclusions of this report. ABD OCHCA - 20 - 7.0 SUPPLEMENTAL CONSIDERATIONS The following non-ASTM components were included in the scope of work for this ESA. According to the EDR database report obtained during this ESA (see Appendix C, Overview Map), no wetlands exist in proximity to the Site. No suspect wetland vegetation were observed on or in close proximity to the Site during URS’ Site reconnaissance. The United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) banned the use of asbestos in building materials during the 1970’s. Building materials are generally found to be free of asbestos after 1981, and suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) installed prior to this date should be assumed to contain asbestos unless testing determines otherwise. Based on information obtained during this ESA, the Site buildings were constructed in 1975 and 1976, and the potential exists for ACMs to be present at the Site. No significant quantities of suspect friable ACMs were observed during URS’ Site reconnaissance. URS recommends managing suspect materials in place and testing suspect materials prior to performing tenant renovations or demolition of Site buildings. In 1978, the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) banned the production of virtually all house paints containing lead. Established guidelines for lead in paint include the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development's (HUD's) 0.5 percent level. This level is a non-enforceable guideline at which lead abatement measures or Operations and Maintenance programs should be implemented. URS did not conduct lead-in-paint sampling at the Site since no damaged (i.e., flaking or peeling) paints were observed. The potential for lead-in-paint should be evaluated prior to disturbing painted surfaces. Drinking water quality is regulated by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the Safe Drinking Water Act of 1974. EPA guidelines recommend a maximum level of 15 micrograms per liter (ug/L) of lead in drinking water from commercial and public buildings. It is recommended that remedial actions be taken for lead levels in excess of 15 ug/L in the 90th percentile. These standards are intended for drinking water suppliers (e.g., municipal water authorities); however, the data evaluation process for assessing lead results may be used for other drinking water sources. Wetlands Asbestos Lead-In- Paint Lead-In- Drinking Water - 21 - The primary source of drinking water observed during URS’ Site reconnaissance was commercially serviced water coolers and bottled water. Under the current use scenario, lead in drinking water is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site, and no further assessment is recommended at this time. Radon is an invisible, odorless radioactive gas formed by the decay of uranium in the earth's soil that migrates to surface through cracks and pore spaces in the soil. Radon gas dissipates in outdoor settings and is present at concentrations considered to be harmless. However, radon gas can accumulate inside buildings and closed spaces; depending on building location, ventilation, and other factors. The USEPA recommends considering indoor remedial measures when the radon concentration exceeds 4.0 picoCuries per liter (pCi/L) on an annual average basis. The Site is located in a designated USEPA Radon Zone 3 where the predicted average radon concentration is less than 2.0 pCi/L. Based on the USEPA designation and the fact that the Site buildings are constructed with slab-on-grade foundations with no basements, radon gas is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site. URS inspected visually accessible building materials for evidence of mold growth during this ESA. No visible evidence of mold damaged building materials was observed during the Site reconnaissance. Radon Mold - 22 - 8.0 LIMITED PHASE II TESTING Based on the findings of the Phase I ESA, URS conducted Phase II testing to evaluate soil conditions in areas thought to have the potential for impacts associated with the historic use of the Site. The focus of the testing was to: 1) evaluate the potential presence of residual industrial constituents in the southern area of the Site corresponding to the documented release of motor oil and former location of the rail spur; and 2) to evaluate for the potential presence of residual agricultural chemicals in Site soils associated with the former use of the property for agricultural purposes. The Phase II testing consisted of advancing a total of 12 soil borings in the southern section of the Site. The locations of the borings are depicted on Figure 2. The area investigated includes the former rail spur area, the location of the motor oil spill, and is a topographically low area of the Site that would likely represent the highest concentrations of residual agricultural chemicals. The sampling area was divided into three segments of similar size (Areas 1 through 3). Within each area four soil samples were collected and composited for laboratory analysis. The sampling areas and locations are depicted on Figure 2 of Appendix A. Soil samples were advanced to a depth where native soil was encountered (one to three feet below ground surface). Soil samples were collected using a slide hammer sampler in brass tubes for submittal to the laboratory for analysis. The composite soil samples were analyzed for the following: 1) extractable petroleum hydrocarbons (EPH) by EPA Method 8015; 2) metals by EPA 6000/7000 Series; 3) volatile organic compounds (VOCs) by EPA Method 8260; 4) semi-VOCs including creosote by EPA Method 8270; and 5) organochlorine pesticides by EPA Method 8081. Laboratory analytical data sheets are included in Appendix E. Tabulated analytical results from the testing are provided in Appendix E. The following summarizes the testing findings. · EPH was below the laboratory reporting limit in each sample. · Metal concentrations were below both the California Title 22 Total Threshold Limit Concentrations (TTLCs) for classifying hazardous waste. Metal concentrations were also below the San Francisco Bay Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels (ESLs) for shallow soil in a residential setting. Metal concentrations were also below the EPA Region IX Preliminary Remediation Goals (PRGs) for residential soils, with the exception of one sample for arsenic (HA1). However, the concentration of arsenic detected in the sample (5.3 millgrams per kilogram [mg/kg]) is within the typical background metal concentration for arsenic in California soils of 0.6 to 11 mg/kg (Bradford et al., 1996). Scope of Work Analytical Results - 23 - Subsequent re-composite and re-analysis of the sample indicated arsenic was below the laboratory reporting limit. · Low levels of the pesticides DDE and DDT were detected in soils, at concentrations significantly below the TTLCs, and ESLs and PRGs for residential soils. · No VOCs were detected above the laboratory reporting limits. · The semi-VOC bis(2-ethylhexyl)phthalate (DEHP) was detected in one sample at a concentration of 12 mg/kg, which is below the ESL and PRG in residential soils for the compound of 66 and 35 mg/kg, respectively. DEHP is a plasticizer commonly used in PVC and could be indicative of plastic or residual commercial waste in the sample. No evidence of a chemical release was identified during the sampling event. Based on the testing results, no evidence of environmental impairment that would result in restrictive use of the Site was identified. - 24 - 9.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Based on the findings of this ESA, URS has identified the following current and historic RECs for the Site. · Screening of Site soils performed during this ESA identified select industrial constituents in Site soils. Based on the testing results, no evidence of significant environmental impairment that would result in restrictive use of the Site was identified. · Motor oil impacted soil was reportedly removed from the southeastern corner of the Site in 1986. The oil reportedly originated from a former World Moving and Storage, Inc. facility located southeast of the Site. No record of the release or cleanup was contained in agency files for the Site address. Testing performed in the area during this ESA did not identify residual impact from the release. Based on the observed removal of the railroad tracks, absence of identified required follow up actions by regulatory agencies, and absence of identified impact during current soil testing, the issue is unlikely to pose an ongoing environmental concern for the Site, and no further assessment is warranted. · Regulatory databases reviewed during this ESA identified a sewage release on the Site in 1998. While details regarding the sewage release was not available, based on the absence of required follow up actions, the issue is unlikely to pose an environmental concern for the Site, and no further assessment is warranted. - 25 - 10.0 LIMITATIONS This Phase I Environmental Site Assessment has been conducted and this report has been prepared for the exclusive use of AMB and its assigns. It is intended to provide an understanding of the current environmental conditions at the Site and adjoining properties and the potential of on-site environmental degradation from future use or release of hazardous or petroleum-based substances on-site or at adjoining properties. URS’ interpretations and conclusions regarding this information and presented in this report are based on the expertise and experience of URS in conducting similar assessments and current local, state and Federal regulations and standards. In evaluating the Site, URS has also relied upon representations and information furnished by individuals noted in the report with respect to existing operations and property conditions and the historic uses of the property to the extent that the information obtained has not been contradicted by data obtained from other sources. Accordingly, URS accepts no responsibility for any deficiency, misstatements or inaccuracy contained in this report as a result of misstatements, omissions, misrepresentations, or fraudulent information provided by the persons interviewed or documents reviewed. URS’ objective is to perform our work with care, exercising the customary thoroughness and competence of earth science, environmental and engineering consulting professionals, in accordance with the standard for professional services for a national consulting firm at the time these services are provided. It is important to recognize that even the most comprehensive scope of services may fail to detect environmental conditions and potential liability at a particular site. Therefore, URS cannot act as insurers and cannot “certify or underwrite” that a site is free of environmental contamination, and no expressed or implied representation or warranty is included or intended in this report except that the work was performed within the limits prescribed with the customary thoroughness and competence of our profession. The passage of time, manifestation of latent conditions, or occurrence of future events may require further exploration at the Site, analysis of the data, and reevaluation of the findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in the report. The findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations expressed by URS in this report are limited by the scope of services and should not be considered an opinion concerning the compliance of any past or current owner or operator of the Site with any federal, state, or local law or regulation. No warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied is made with respect to the data reported or findings, observations, conclusions, and recommendations expressed in this report. - 26 - APPENDIX A FIGURES N:\AMB Property\Stadium Bus Prk\StadiumFigure 1.doc LOCATION MAP Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Stadium Business Park Anaheim, California FIGURE 1 SITE S y s t e m s P a r k w a y \ 0 2 - 0 5 - s t a d i u m - a n a h e i m . c d r L C T 0 3 . 0 7 . 0 5 S A C Fi g u r e 2 . S i t e L a y o u t M a p St a d i u m B u s i n e s s P a r k , A n a h e i m , C A 10 2 3 5 S y s t e m s P a r k w a y , S u i t e A Sa c r a m e n t o , C a l i f o r n i a 9 5 8 2 7 (9 1 6 ) 2 3 1 - 2 3 1 0 N NOT T O S C A L E Mi x e d Co m m e r c i a l / In d u s t r i a l GE N E A U T R Y W A Y BL D . 4 BL D . 3 BL D . 2 BL D . 1 BL D . 9 BL D . 8 BL D . 7 BL D . 6 B L D . 5 Mi x e d Co m m e r c i a l / In d u s t r i a l Anaheim Stadium Parking LotSTATE COLLEGE BLVD. | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | As p h a l t P a v e d Ar e a Ar e a 1 (3 2 0 ' x 4 0 ' ) HA 1 D HA 1 B HA 1 A HA 1 C HA 2 A Ar e a 2 (4 0 0 ' x 4 0 ' ) Ar e a 3 (4 0 0 ' x 4 0 ' ) HA 2 C HA 2 D HA 2 B HA 3 A HA 3 C HA 3 D HA 3 B So i l S a m p l i n g L o c a t i o n Fo r m e r R a i l S p u r | | | | | APPENDIX B PHOTOGRAPHIC LOG PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD Client Name: AMB Property Corporation Site Location: Stadium Business Park, Anaheim, CA Project No. Photo No. 1 View Direction of Photo: Facing West Description: View of North side of Site along E. Gene Autry Way Photo No. 2 View Direction of Photo: Facing East Description: View of front of Building 8 along E. Gene Autry Way PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD Client Name: AMB Property Corporation Site Location: Stadium Business Park, Anaheim, CA Project No. Photo No. 3 View Direction of Photo: Facing Southwest Description: View of front of Building 4 along S. State College Boulevard Photo No. 4 View Direction of Photo: Facing Southwest Description: View of front of Buildings 2 and 3 along S. State College Boulevard PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD Client Name: AMB Property Corporation Site Location: Stadium Business Park, Anaheim, CA Project No. Photo No. 5 View Direction of Photo: Facing West Description: View along southern property line in area of removed railroad tracks Photo No. 6 View Direction of Photo: Facing Southwest Description: View of front of Building 5 and adjacent grounds PHOTOGRAPHIC RECORD Client Name: AMB Property Corporation Site Location: Stadium Business Park, Anaheim, CA Project No. Photo No. 7 View Direction of Photo: Facing East Description: View of hazardous waste storage at NBTY Manufacturing in Building 5 Photo No. 8 View Direction of Photo: Facing North Description: View of hazardous materials storage at Sericol in Building 9 APPENDIX C: CITY DIRECTORIES Stadium Park 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 Inquiry Number: 4340409.5 June 30, 2015 The EDR-City Directory Abstract 6 Armstrong Road Shelton, CT 06484 800.352.0050 www.edrnet.comEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources IncEnvironmental Data Resources Inc TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION Executive Summary Findings City Directory Images Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction orforecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DESCRIPTION Environmental Data Resources, Inc.’s (EDR) City Directory Abstract is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s City Directory Abstract includes a search and abstract of available city directory data. For each address, the directory lists the name of the corresponding occupant at five year intervals. Business directories including city, cross reference and telephone directories were reviewed, if available, at approximately five year intervals for the years spanning 1920 through 2013. This report compiles information gathered in this review by geocoding the latitude and longitude of properties identified and gathering information about properties within 660 feet of the target property. A summary of the information obtained is provided in the text of this report. RESEARCH SUMMARY The following research sources were consulted in the preparation of this report. An "X" indicates where information was identified in the source and provided in this report. Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 2013 Cole Information Services - X X - 2008 Cole Information Services - X X - 2003 Cole Information Services - X X - 2002 Haines Company - --- 2001 Pacific Telephone - --- 1997 Pacific Bell - --- 1995 Pacific Bell - X X - 1992 Pacific Bell - --- 1991 Pacific Bell - X X - 1986 Pacific Bell - X X - 1980 Pacific Telephone - X X - 1975 Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc.- X X - 1971 Luskey Brothers Co., Inc.- --- 1970 General Telephone Co., of California - X X - Ross Publications - X X - 1966 Pacific Telephone - X X - 1965 Ross Publications, Inc.,- --- 1961 Luskey Brothers & Co.,- --- 1960 Unknown - --- 1956 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.- --- 1955 The Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Co.- --- 1952 Luskeys Directory Service Co.- --- 1950 West Directory Co.- --- 1946 Southern California Telephone Co.- --- 1945 Western Directory Co.- --- 4340409-5 Page 1 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Source TPYear Adjoining Text Abstract Source Image 1941 Southern California Telephone Co.- --- 1936 Western Directory Co.- --- 1930 Western Directory Co.- --- 1926 Pacific Telephone - --- 1925 Western Directory Co.- --- 1922 Kaasen Directory Co.- --- 1921 Western Directory Co.- --- 1920 Santa Ana Directory Co.- --- 4340409-5 Page 2 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 FINDINGS DETAIL Target Property research detail. 4340409-5 Page 3 FINDINGS ADJOINING PROPERTY DETAIL The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report. Detailed findings are provided for each address. E GENE AUTRY WAY 1361 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2003 ACTION ASSEMBLY INC Cole Information Services A & V TECHNICAL SCHOOL INC Cole Information Services 1995 California International Network Pacific Bell 1363 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2003 WESTBOND INC Cole Information Services 1381 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2013 TALKIN SPORTS Cole Information Services 1995 Medlrec Pacific Bell 1383 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2008 K C I USA INC Cole Information Services 2003 QUALITY & SERVICE Cole Information Services THE PLACE Cole Information Services 1391 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 1995 Coloramics Tile Inc Pacific Bell 1500 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 1995 Hughes RSInc Pacific Bell 1520 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2008 DOOR TECH INDUSTRIES Cole Information Services 2003 DOOR TECH INDUSTRIES INC Cole Information Services 4340409-5 Page 4 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 1551 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2003 WEST BOND INC Cole Information Services 1995 WEST BOND INC Pacific Bell 1605 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2013 HALL GEO T CO INC Cole Information Services HALL GEORGE T CO INC Cole Information Services 2008 CONTROLCO SYSTEMS Cole Information Services GEORGE T HALL CO INC Cole Information Services 2003 PARADE MAGAZINE INC Cole Information Services MCKIMSON PRODUCTIONS INC Cole Information Services 1995 Hall George T Co Inc Pacific Bell 1680 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2008 BRAD RAMBO ASSOCIATES INC Cole Information Services 1995 Horizon Carpet Mills Pacific Bell 1700 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2013 SMALLEY & COMPANY Cole Information Services 2008 VISUAL PLATFORMS Cole Information Services 2003 SMALLEY CO Cole Information Services 1995 Smalley & Co Pacific Bell 1720 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2008 MCK BUSINESS CORP Cole Information Services CONTRACTORS WIRE & CABLE INC Cole Information Services 2003 CONTRACTORS WIRE & CABLE Cole Information Services 1995 Ebbert Comfrrep Pacific Bell 1740 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2003 OPTIMA COTTON WEAR Cole Information Services 1760 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2008 ADVANTAGE CROWN SALES & MARKET Cole Information Services 4340409-5 Page 5 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 2003 CONTRACT SERVICES INC Cole Information Services 1995 LA Outbound Pacific Bell Nationwide Transportation Pacific Bell 1780 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2003 IMPORT STONE INC Cole Information Services 1995 Tau Ceramics Inc Pacific Bell 1790 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 2008 RAMANN ENTERPRISES INC Cole Information Services 1995 Glantz N & Son Pacific Bell 1880 E GENE AUTRY WAY Year Uses Source 1995 Compac Microelectronics Pacific Bell S CHRIS LN 1910 S CHRIS LN Year Uses Source 1980 I Telerent Leasing Corporation Pacific Telephone 1911 S CHRIS LN Year Uses Source 1980 I Imperial Builders Pacific Telephone S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 1969 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1995 Tuxedo Printing Inc Pacific Bell 1991 Power Escrow Inc Pacific Bell 1986 A L WilliamsOrtego Region Pacific Bell 1980 Leaseland Pacific Telephone 1971 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1995 Mon Cheris Collectibles Pacific Bell AM Funding Resources Inc Pacific Bell 4340409-5 Page 6 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Stadium Computers Pacific Bell Home & Business Computer Center Pacific Bell 1980 Concord Electronics Pacific Telephone 1973 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2003 SEABREEZE MORTGAGE SERVICES Cole Information Services 1995 Wedding Network The Pacific Bell Cosman Wayne Photographies Pacific Bell Image West Photography Pacific Bell 1986 Stadium Baseball Cards Pacific Bell 1975 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1995 Microplex Inc Pacific Bell 1991 From Santa Ass Telephones Cal Pacific Bell Mcroptex Inc Pacific Bell 1986 Microplex Inc Pacific Bell Micro Components Inc Pacific Bell 1977 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1986 RAP Enterprises Pacific Bell T E C Electronic Co Pacific Bell 1980 Arigado Fashions Pacific Telephone 1979 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2003 ENVIRONMENTAL TRNNG & CMPLNC Cole Information Services ENVIRONMENTAL TRAINING Cole Information Services ETAC Cole Information Services 1995 Environmental Training & Compliance Pacific Bell ETAC Pacific Bell 1980 Credit Way Pacific Telephone 1981 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1991 Heating And Air Conditioning Co The Pacific Bell 1986 Park West Microcomponents Inc Pacific Bell 1980 Kruse M atty Pacific Telephone 4340409-5 Page 7 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 1985 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1991 Orange County Bum Association Pacific Bell 1980 De Vito Dominic Pacific Telephone i LE S LIE & AS S OCIATE S Pacific Telephone Magna City Ken Cranes Pacific Telephone Magna B oard Systems Pacific Telephone 1987 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2008 PRIMERICA FINANCIAL SERVICES Cole Information Services 1995 Ceraso Ins Pacific Bell 1986 Mike Russ Schools Pacific Bell 2000 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1995 ARA Services Inc Pacific Bell USCPWesco Inc Pacific Bell Ullrlch DL Pacific Bell 1991 ARAServiceslnc Pacific Bell ANAHEIM STADIUM Pacific Bell Angels Baseball Club Pacific Bell California Angels Baseball Club Pacific Bell Ticket Information Pacific Bell General Offices Pacific Bell California Angels Fantasy Baseball Camp Pacific Bell Disneyland Pigskin Classic Pacific Bell Freedom Bowl Pacific Bell Mickey Thompson Entertainment Group Pacific Bell Anaheom Stadium Pacific Bell U S C P Wesco Inc Pacific Bell Uilifch DI Pacific Bell Villelli Enterprises Inc Pacific Bell 1986 AN AHE IM S TADIUM Pacific Bell Angels Baseball Club Pacific Bell Arthur Andersen & Co Pacific Bell Executive Suite The Pacific Bell Freedom Bowl Pacific Bell Investment Properties Pacific Bell Santiago Corp Pacific Bell 4340409-5 Page 8 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1986 Anaheim Stadium Pacific Bell 1980 S TADIUM Pacific Telephone Business Office Pacific Telephone Szabo Food Service Pacific Telephone RE FUS E COLLE CTION S Pacific Telephone IN FORMATION ON ANZ CITY ACTIVITY Pacific Telephone AN AHE IM S TADIUM Pacific Telephone General Office Pacific Telephone Ticket Office Pacific Telephone Administrative Office Pacific Telephone Stadium Event Information Pacific Telephone Los Angeles Rams Ticket Office Pacific Telephone Stadium Club Pacific Telephone Szabo Food Service Pacific Telephone Ticket Information Pacific Telephone General Offices Pacific Telephone California Answering Service Shool Pacific Telephone Hartman Bud Pacific Telephone Johns Buck & Colleon Pacific Telephone Mobile Financial Inc Pacific Telephone Sports Comm Inc Pacific Telephone Stadium Club Restaurant Pacific Telephone U S C P Wesco Inc Pacific Telephone Wilson Ken Pacific Telephone World Sp Iorts Enterprises Pacific Telephone 1975 STADIUM Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Administration Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Anaheim Stadium Baseball Club Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. ANAHEIM STADIUM CLUB BANQUET ROOMS Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. California Angels Baseball Club Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Canteen Corp Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Canteen Corp banquet rms Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Discount Shopping Service Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Long Beach Independent Press Telegram Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Southern California Sun Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sports Comm Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Stadium Club Restaurant Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. Sun Football Inc Luskey Brothers & Co., Inc. 4340409-5 Page 9 Year Uses Source FINDINGS Year Uses Source 1970 Anaheim General Telephone Co., of California STADIUM General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim Stadium Club Banquet Rooms General Telephone Co., of California Anaheim Stadium Club Restaurant General Telephone Co., of California Executive Sports Programmers General Telephone Co., of California Nationwide Concessions Div of Automatic Canteen Co of America General Telephone Co., of California Stadium Club Restaurant General Telephone Co., of California 2009 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2008 THE TICKET OUTLET Cole Information Services 2003 TICKET OUTLET Cole Information Services 1995 Ticket Outlet The Pacific Bell Super Fan Sport Shop Pacific Bell 1991 Ticket Outlet The Pacific Bell Super Fan Sport Shop Pacific Bell 1986 Super Fan Sport Shop Pacific Bell 1980 Anaheim Stadium Office Pacific Telephone 2011 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2013 AZ TECH BUILDING MAINTENANCE Cole Information Services 2008 BLACKBURN TEGART INC Cole Information Services 2003 TRAVEL MERCHANTS Cole Information Services 1995 Travel Merchants Pacific Bell 1991 TRAVELNETWORK Pacific Bell Fravel Merchants Pacific Bell 2013 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1991 American Speedy Printing Centers Pacific Bell 1986 Minute Man Press Of Anaheim Pacific Bell 2015 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2003 LE GOURMET KITCHEN Cole Information Services 1995 Le Gourmet Kitchen Pacific Bell 1980 P S C Pacific Telephone 4340409-5 Page 10 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 2017 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1991 Architectural Tile & Granite Pacific Bell 1980 Vtow Pacific Telephone COMPLE TE RE PRODUCTION S E RVICE Pacific Telephone Ajll Wt Sdolivan @Santa Ana@ Pacific Telephone 2019 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1995 Eagle Distributing Pacific Bell 1986 Mission Mexican Food Products Pacific Bell 2021 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2003 FLOWSERVE US INC Cole Information Services 1995 Aloe Pacific Bell FOREVER LIVING PRODUCTS ALOE VERA CENTER Pacific Bell 1991 A&MMarble Pacific Bell 1980 CRE ATIVE LIGHTIN G & MAIN TE N AN CE Pacific Telephone 2023 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1986 Audio Visual Orange County Corporate Headquarters Pacific Bell 2025 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2003 LM HERNANDEZ & SONS INC Cole Information Services LMH INC Cole Information Services 1995 PTC Natural Floor Collectiion Pacific Bell 1991 West Coast Ceramic Tile Distributors Inc Pacific Bell 1986 COMME RCIAL BUILDIN G S UPPLY Pacific Bell Asbestos & Asbestos Pacific Bell Prefiished Wall Board Co Pacific Bell 1980 Speedy Business Cards Pacific Telephone 2027 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1980 CBS Ltd Landscape Pacific Telephone 4340409-5 Page 11 Year Uses Source FINDINGS 2029 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2013 THIRFTY SHUTTERS Cole Information Services 2008 PACIFIC SHUTTERS Cole Information Services 2003 PACIFIC SHUTTERS Cole Information Services 1995 Stadium Business Park South Admin Ofc Pacific Bell 1991 California Remodeling Pacific Bell From Anaheim Telephones Call Pacific Bell 1986 K D S Marketing Pacific Bell 1980 International Cosmetics Corp .Pacific Telephone I Pacific Telephone 2031 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1991 A 1 ANDERSON AUTO SALES & LEASING Pacific Bell A 1 ANDERSON MORTGAGE LENDING Pacific Bell 2040 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2013 WORLD OF DECOR Cole Information Services 2008 REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CAL Cole Information Services UCI MEDICAL CENTER Cole Information Services 2003 UCI MEDICAL CTR Cole Information Services S STATE COLLEGE PKY 1999 S STATE COLLEGE PKY Year Uses Source 1966 SOUTHERN COUNTIES GAS CO Pacific Telephone 2000 S STATE COLLEGE PKY Year Uses Source 1970 California Angels Baseball Club General Telephone Co., of California 1966 Anaheim Stadium Club Restaurant Pacific Telephone Nationwide Concessions Div of Automatic Canteen Co of America Pacific Telephone Stadium Club Restaurant Pacific Telephone 4340409-5 Page 12 Year Uses Source FINDINGS STATE COLLEGE 2015 STATE COLLEGE Year Uses Source 1995 Le Gourmet Kitchen Pacific Bell STATE COLLEGE BLVD 1981 STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 2013 WWWSOCALGASCOM Cole Information Services 2000 STATE COLLEGE BLVD Year Uses Source 1966 California Angels Baseball Club Pacific Telephone California Angels Pacific Telephone ANGELS BASEBALL CLUB ANAHEIM STADIUM Pacific Telephone Anaheim Stadium Manager Pacific Telephone STATE COLLEGE BLVD S 2000 STATE COLLEGE BLVD S Year Uses Source 1970 CALIF ANGELS BASEBALL CLUB STATE COLLEGE ANH Ross Publications STADIUM CLUB RESTR S STATE COLLEGE ANH Ross Publications NATIONWIDE CONCESSIONS S STATE COLLEGE ANH Ross Publications ANH CITY OF-STADIUM S STATE COLLEGE BL ANH Ross Publications ANH CITY OF-STADIUM S STATE COLLEGE BL ANH Ross Publications 4340409-5 Page 13 FINDINGS TARGET PROPERTY: ADDRESS NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Target Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in the research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1800 Gene Autry Way 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 ADJOINING PROPERTY: ADDRESSES NOT IDENTIFIED IN RESEARCH SOURCE The following Adjoining Property addresses were researched for this report, and the addresses were not identified in research source. Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1361 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1361 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1363 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1381 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1381 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1383 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1391 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1500 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1520 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1551 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1551 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1605 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1605 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1680 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1680 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1700 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1700 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1720 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1720 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1740 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1760 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1760 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1780 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1780 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1790 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1790 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1880 E GENE AUTRY WAY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1910 S CHRIS LN 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 1911 S CHRIS LN 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1969 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1971 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1973 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1973 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1975 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1977 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1979 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1979 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1981 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1981 STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1985 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1987 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1987 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 1999 S STATE COLLEGE PKY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2000 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2000 S STATE COLLEGE PKY 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 2000 STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2000 STATE COLLEGE BLVD S 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2009 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2009 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2011 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2011 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2013 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2015 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2015 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2015 STATE COLLEGE 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2017 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2019 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2021 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2021 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2023 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2025 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2025 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 FINDINGS Address Researched Address Not Identified in Research Source 2027 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2029 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1992, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2029 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2031 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2013, 2008, 2003, 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 2040 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD 2002, 2001, 1997, 1995, 1992, 1991, 1986, 1980, 1975, 1971, 1970, 1966, 1965, 1961, 1960, 1956, 1955, 1952, 1950, 1946, 1945, 1941, 1936, 1930, 1926, 1925, 1922, 1921, 1920 APPENDIX D: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHS The EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Stadium Park 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 Inquiry Number: 4340409.9 June 30, 2015 EDR Aerial Photo Decade Package Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR) Aerial Photo Decade Package is a screening tool designed to assist environmental professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDR’s professional researchers provide digitally reproduced historical aerial photographs, and when available, provide one photo per decade. When delivered electronically by EDR, the aerial photo images included with this report are for ONE TIME USE ONLY. Further reproduction of these aerial photo images is prohibited without permission from EDR. For more information contact your EDR Account Executive. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Date EDR Searched Historical Sources: Aerial Photography June 30, 2015 Target Property: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 Year Scale Details Source 1938 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1938 USGS 1947 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1947 Fairchild 1953 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1953 USGS 1963 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1963 USGS 1972 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1972 USGS 1977 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1977 USGS 1987 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1987 USGS 1990 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 1990 USGS 1995 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'/DOQQ - acquisition dates: 1995 USGS/DOQQ 2005 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 2005 USDA/NAIP 2009 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 2009 USDA/NAIP 2010 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 2010 USDA/NAIP 2012 Aerial Photograph. Scale: 1"=500'Flight Year: 2012 USDA/NAIP 4340409.9 2 INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1938 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1947 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1953 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1963 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1972 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1977 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1987 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1990 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 1995 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 2005 = 500' INQUIRY #: YEAR: 4340409.9 2012 = 500' APPENDIX E: TOPOGRAPHIC MAPS EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Stadium Park 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 Inquiry Number: 4340409.4 June 29, 2015 EDR Historical Topographic Map Report Environmental Data Resources, Inc.s (EDR) Historical Topographic Map Report is designed to assist professionals in evaluating potential liability on a target property resulting from past activities. EDRs Historical Topographic Map Report includes a search of a collection of public and private color historical topographic maps, dating back to the early 1900s. Thank you for your business. Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050 with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report AS IS. Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: ANAHEIM MAP YEAR: 1898 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:62500 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: SOUTHERN CA SHEET 1 MAP YEAR: 1901 SERIES: 60 SCALE: 1:250000 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: CORONA MAP YEAR: 1902 SERIES: 30 SCALE: 1:125000 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: GARDEN GROVE MAP YEAR: 1935 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:31680 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: ANAHEIM MAP YEAR: 1942 SERIES: 15 SCALE: 1:50000 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: ANAHEIM MAP YEAR: 1950 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: ANAHEIM MAP YEAR: 1965 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: ANAHEIM MAP YEAR: 1972 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 Historical Topographic Map Õ N TARGET QUADTARGET QUAD NAME: ANAHEIM MAP YEAR: 1981 PHOTOREVISED FROM :1965 SERIES: 7.5 SCALE: 1:24000 SITE NAME: Stadium Park ADDRESS: 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 LAT/LONG: 33.7988 / -117.8914 CLIENT: Vertex Engineering Services CONTACT: Manasi Chavan INQUIRY#: 4340409.4 RESEARCH DATE: 06/29/2015 APPENDIX F: SANBORN FIRE INSURANCE MAPS Certified Sanborn® Map Report Stadium Park 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 Inquiry Number: 4340409.3 June 29, 2015 Certified Sanborn® Map Report 6/29/15 Site Name: Stadium Park 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 Client Name: Vertex Engineering Services 400 Libbey Parkway Weymouth, MA 02189-0000 Contact: Manasi ChavanEDR Inquiry # 4340409.3 The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Vertex Engineering Services were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps. The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data Resources Inc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for the collection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of the day this report was generated. Certified Sanborn Results: Site Name:Stadium Park Address:1800 Gene Autry Way City, State, Zip:Anaheim, CA 92805 Cross Street: P.O. #35044 Project:35044 Certification #6243-4338-9CE3 Library of Congress University Publications of America EDR Private Collection The Sanborn Library LLC Since 1866™ The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 million fire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which track historical property usage in approximately 12,000 American cities and towns. Collections searched: Sanborn® Library search results Certification # 6243-4338-9CE3 UNMAPPED PROPERTY This report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library, LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied target property information, and fire insurance maps covering the target property were not found. Limited Permission To Make Copies Vertex Engineering Services (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance map accompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDR Account Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, its customer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. 4340409 - 3 page 2 APPENDIX G: REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT FORM-LBC-ARB ®kcehCoeG htiw tropeR ™paM suidaR RDE ehT 6 Armstrong Road, 4th floorShelton, CT 06484Toll Free: 800.352.0050www.edrnet.com Stadium Park 1800 Gene Autry Way Anaheim, CA 92805 Inquiry Number: 4340409.2s June 30, 2015 SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1 Overview Map 2 Detail Map 3 Map Findings Summary 4 Map Findings 8 Orphan Summary 187 Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1 Physical Setting Source Summary A-2 Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-6 Physical Setting Source Map A-10 Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-12 Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 TC4340409.2s Page 1 Thank you for your business.Please contact EDR at 1-800-352-0050with any questions or comments. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental DataResources, Inc. It cannot be concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist fromother sources. NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Any analyses, estimates, ratings,environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to provide, norshould they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for anyproperty. Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2015 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in wholeor in part, of any report or map of Environmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All othertrademarks used herein are the property of their respective owners. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 1 A search of available environmental records was conducted by Environmental Data Resources, Inc (EDR). The report was designed to assist parties seeking to meet the search requirements of EPA’s Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (40 CFR Part 312), the ASTM Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments (E 1527-13) or custom requirements developed for the evaluation of environmental risk associated with a parcel of real estate. TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 COORDINATES 33.7988000 - 33˚ 47’ 55.68’’Latitude (North): 117.8914000 - 117˚ 53’ 29.04’’Longitude (West): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 417484.4UTM X (Meters): 3740011.0UTM Y (Meters): 147 ft. above sea levelElevation: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY 33117-G8 ANAHEIM, CATarget Property Map: 1981Most Recent Revision: 33117-G7 ORANGE, CAEast Map: 1981Most Recent Revision: AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT 20120505Portions of Photo from: USDASource: 4340409.2s Page 2 F39 PACIFIC IMAGE 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU RCRA-LQG Lower 896, 0.170, WNW F38 PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNO 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU RCRA-LQG Lower 896, 0.170, WNW F37 PACIFIC IMAGE, INC 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU RCRA-LQG Lower 896, 0.170, WNW 36 CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SH 1800 TALBOT WAY RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET, EMI, ENVIROSTOR, WDS Higher 884, 0.167, North F35 SCOTTS INDEPENDENCE, 1885 S SANTA CRUZ CA FID UST, SWEEPS UST Lower 878, 0.166, WNW F34 SCOTT’S INDEPENDENT, 1885 S SANTA CRUZ ST UST Lower 878, 0.166, WNW F33 MER CEDES SHOP THE 1884 S SANTA CRUZ ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS Lower 869, 0.165, WNW F32 1884 S SANTA CRUZ ST EDR US Hist Auto Stat Lower 869, 0.165, WNW 31 500 N STATE COLLEGE EDR US Hist Auto Stat Lower 851, 0.161, SSE 30 VETERINARY REFERENCE 1871 CHRIS LN RCRA-SQG, FINDS Higher 843, 0.160, NNW E29 500 S MAIN ST ASSOC 500 530 550 600 S MA RCRA-SQG, FINDS Lower 704, 0.133, SE 28 LIFE FLEET 1890 S BETMOR LN RCRA-SQG, FINDS Lower 673, 0.127, NW D27 RYDER STUDENT BUS SE 917 E GENE AUTRY AVE LUST Lower 666, 0.126, WNW D26 RYDER STUDENT TRANS 917 E PACIFICO RCRA-SQG, FINDS, CA FID UST, UST, SWEEPS UST Lower 666, 0.126, WNW D25 AIRPORT COACH 917 E GENE AUTRY WY RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET Lower 666, 0.126, WNW E24 LAMCOR INC 2025 E ORANGEWOOD AV UST Lower 664, 0.126, SE E23 LAMCOR INC. 2025 E ORANGEWOOD AV HIST UST Lower 664, 0.126, SE E22 LAMCOR INC 2025 ORANGEWOOD HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 664, 0.126, SE D21 RYDER STUDENT BUS SE 917 GENE AUTRY AVE HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 661, 0.125, WNW D20 BROWN AND CALDWELL L 1200EAST PACIFICO RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS Lower 592, 0.112, WNW D19 MILLENNIUM CIRCUITS 1200 E GENE AUTRY WA RCRA-SQG, FINDS Lower 592, 0.112, WNW C18 SOUTHERN CALIF GAS C 1919 S STATE COLLEGE CA FID UST Higher 567, 0.107, NE B17 STARWOOD O.C. PORTFO 2099 STATE COLLEGE B LUST Lower 563, 0.107, SE C16 1919 S STATE COLLEGE EDR US Hist Auto Stat Higher 551, 0.104, NE C15 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1919 STATE COLLEGE B RCRA-LQG Higher 551, 0.104, NE C14 ANAHEIM 1919 S STATE COLLEGE HIST UST Higher 551, 0.104, NE C13 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1919 S STATE COLLEGE UST, SWEEPS UST Higher 551, 0.104, NE 12 COOPER POWER TOOLS 2000 S SANTA CRUZ ST RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET Lower 537, 0.102, West 11 ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUS 1880 CHRIS LANE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, CA FID UST, UST, SWEEPS UST,... Higher 489, 0.093, NNW B10 STATE COLLEGE PLAZA 2099 S STATE COLLEGE UST, SWEEPS UST Lower 361, 0.068, SE B9 STATE COLLEGE PLAZA 2099 S STATE COLLEGE CA FID UST Lower 361, 0.068, SE 8 ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 S STATE COLLEGE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, CA FID UST, UST Higher 63, 0.012, ENE A7 NBTY MANUFACTURING L 1800 GENE AUTRY WY HAZNET TP A6 NBTY MANUFACTURING,L 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY EMI TP A5 NBTY MANUFACTURING L 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY HAZNET TP A4 NBTY MANUFACTURING L 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY FINDS TP A3 D & F INDUSTRIES 1800 EAST GENE AUTRY HAZNET TP A2 D & F INDUSTRIES 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY EMI TP A1 D & F INDUSTRIES 1800 GENE AUTRY HAZNET TP MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 4340409.2s Page 3 78 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 818 E KATELLA AVE LUST Lower 2013, 0.381, NW M77 TAORMINA INDUSTRIES, 300 ANAHEIM HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 1907, 0.361, SSE N76 JOHN DAVID INTERNATI 1858 S ANAHEIM BLVD LUST, Orange Co. Industrial Site Lower 1877, 0.355, WNW N75 JOHN DAVID INTERNATI 1858 ANAHEIM BLVD HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 1831, 0.347, WNW M74 CLAUDE HOLT 505 004TH ST HIST CORTESE, LUST, CA FID UST, SWEEPS UST Lower 1808, 0.342, South M73 CALTRANS/C.O. THOMPS 505 ANAHEIM BLVD HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 1808, 0.342, South M72 C. O. THOMPSON PETRO 531 ANAHEIM BLVD LUST Lower 1788, 0.339, South M71 C. O. THOMPSON PETRO 531 ANAHEIM BLVD LUST Lower 1788, 0.339, South L70 TOSCO/76 SS #8800 1818 SOUTH LEWIS STR LUST Lower 1726, 0.327, NW L69 TOSCO - 76 STATION # 1818 LEWIS ST LUST Lower 1726, 0.327, NW L68 UNOCAL #8800 1818 LEWIS HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 1726, 0.327, NW L67 STATION #8800 1818 S LEWIS ST LUST, HIST UST Lower 1726, 0.327, NW K66 ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT T 1000 E KATELLA ST CERC-NFRAP, RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ENVIROSTOR Higher 1685, 0.319, NW K65 BROWNCO CONSTRUCTION 1000 EAST KATELLA AV SLIC Higher 1685, 0.319, NW K64 JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 E KATELLA AVE RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HIST CORTESE, LUST, HIST UST, EMI Higher 1651, 0.313, NW K63 PLATINUM TRIANGLE 1016 EAST KATELLA AV SCH, LUST, ENVIROSTOR Higher 1651, 0.313, NW J62 WESTRUX INTERNATIONA 1110 E KATELLA AVE LUST Higher 1492, 0.283, NW J61 WESTRUX INTL 1110 E KATELLA RCRA NonGen / NLR, FINDS, HIST CORTESE, LUST, CA... Higher 1492, 0.283, NW I60 CHUAN CHUN LU 1801 S STATE COLLEGE HIST UST Higher 1316, 0.249, NNE I59 ARCO #6220 1801 S STATE COLLEGE LUST Higher 1316, 0.249, NNE I58 ARCO FACILITY #05999 1801 S STATE COLLEGE UST Higher 1316, 0.249, NNE I57 ARCO #6220 1801 STATE COLLEGE HIST CORTESE, LUST Higher 1316, 0.249, NNE I56 ARCO FACILITY #6220 1801 S STATE COLLEGE CA FID UST, SWEEPS UST Higher 1316, 0.249, NNE 55 KEESE TANK CO 1928 S ANAHEIM BLVD UST, Orange Co. Industrial Site Lower 1214, 0.230, West H54 2000 E GENE AUTRY WA AST Higher 1202, 0.228, East H53 ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 S GENE AUTRY WA SWEEPS UST Higher 1174, 0.222, East H52 ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 SOUTH STATE COL HIST UST Higher 1174, 0.222, East G51 PLATINUM TRIANGLE PA 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV RCRA-LQG, HAZNET Lower 1095, 0.207, ESE G50 PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV HIST CORTESE, LUST, CA FID UST, SWEEPS UST, EMI Lower 1095, 0.207, ESE G49 PINATA FOODS, INC. 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV HIST UST Lower 1095, 0.207, ESE G48 ACCURATE METAL SOLUT 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AV RCRA-LQG Lower 1077, 0.204, SE G47 AMF ANAHEIM LLC 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AV NPDES, HIST UST, EMI Lower 1077, 0.204, SE G46 APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEM 2100 E. ORANGEWOOD A RCRA-LQG, EMI Lower 1077, 0.204, SE G45 EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD LUST Lower 1077, 0.204, SE G44 EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 1077, 0.204, SE G43 GATEWAY APARTMENTS I 2020,2034,2040 & 210 VCP, ENVIROSTOR Lower 1077, 0.204, SE G42 EVEREST ELECTRONIC E 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AV UST Lower 1077, 0.204, SE 41 C O THOMPSON PETROLE 11546 ANAHEIM BLVD HIST UST Lower 949, 0.180, SSW F40 MALCO SERVICES 1865 S SANTA CRUZ RCRA-SQG, FINDS, HAZNET Lower 916, 0.173, WNW MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS 4340409.2s Page 4 94 INLAND SPECIALTY CHE 2023 WEST COLLINS AV SLIC, ENVIROSTOR Higher 4720, 0.894, ENE 93 SILGAN PLASTICS CORP 611 EAST CERRITOS AV ENVIROSTOR Higher 4683, 0.887, NW 92 NEVILLE CHEMICAL 2201 CERRITOS AVE NPDES, HIST CORTESE, LUST, ENF, ENVIROSTOR Higher 4660, 0.883, NNE 91 SUPERIOR PLATING 1901 E CERRITOS AVE RCRA-LQG, FINDS, NPDES, EMI, ENVIROSTOR Higher 4040, 0.765, NNE 90 PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE SCH, ENVIROSTOR Lower 3418, 0.647, WSW 89 THE CITY PLACE NORTH 3745 WEST CHAPMAN AV ENVIROSTOR Lower 3142, 0.595, South 88 ITASCO 2211 EAST HOWELL STR SLIC, ENVIROSTOR Higher 2898, 0.549, NNE 87 SHELL OIL PRODUCTS U 2331 KATELLA AVE., E LUST Higher 2629, 0.498, NE Q86 STADIUM MOTORS 2225 E KATELLA AVE LUST Higher 2543, 0.482, NE Q85 STADIUM MOTORS, INC 2225 KATELLA AVE RCRA NonGen / NLR, HIST CORTESE, LUST Higher 2543, 0.482, NE 84 DANA EDWARDS 1901 MANCHESTER HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 2526, 0.478, WNW P83 TEXACO OIL 1650 STATE COLLEGE HIST CORTESE, LUST Higher 2523, 0.478, NNE P82 DEL PISO BRICK COMPA 1635 STATE COLLEGE HIST CORTESE, LUST, CA FID UST Higher 2466, 0.467, NNE O81 WESTSIDE MATERIALS 700 E KATELLA AVE LUST Lower 2328, 0.441, WNW O80 WESTSIDE MATERIALS 700 KATELLA HIST CORTESE, LUST Lower 2328, 0.441, WNW 79 CERTRON 1701 STATE COLLEGE HIST CORTESE, LUST Higher 2061, 0.390, NNE MAPPED SITES SUMMARY Target Property Address: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Click on Map ID to see full detail. MAP RELATIVE DIST (ft. & mi.) ID DATABASE ACRONYMS ELEVATION DIRECTIONSITE NAME ADDRESS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 5 TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS The target property was identified in the following records. For more information on this property see page 8 of the attached EDR Radius Map report: EPA IDDatabase(s)Site D & F INDUSTRIES 1800 GENE AUTRY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAC001207392 D & F INDUSTRIES 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 N/AEMI Facility Id: 54658 D & F INDUSTRIES 1800 EAST GENE AUTRY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAL000157643 NBTY MANUFACTURING L 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 N/AFINDS Registry ID:: 110021343875 NBTY MANUFACTURING L 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAL000273102 NBTY MANUFACTURING,L 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CA 92805 N/AEMI Facility Id: 129259 NBTY MANUFACTURING L 1800 GENE AUTRY WY ANAHEIM, CA 92807 N/AHAZNET GEPAID: CAL000237945 DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES No mapped sites were found in EDR’s search of available ("reasonably ascertainable ") government records either on the target property or within the search radius around the target property for the following databases: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL National Priority List EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 6 Proposed NPL Proposed National Priority List Sites NPL LIENS Federal Superfund Liens Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL National Priority List Deletions Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information SystemFEDERAL FACILITY Federal Facility Site Information listing Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS Corrective Action Report Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-CESQG RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generator Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS Engineering Controls Sites ListUS INST CONTROL Sites with Institutional Controls LUCIS Land Use Control Information System Federal ERNS list ERNS Emergency Response Notification System State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE State Response Sites State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF Solid Waste Information System State and tribal leaking storage tank lists INDIAN LUST Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land State and tribal registered storage tank lists INDIAN UST Underground Storage Tanks on Indian LandFEMA UST Underground Storage Tank Listing State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites INDIAN VCP Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS A Listing of Brownfields Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 7 Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites DEBRIS REGION 9 Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site LocationsODIOpen Dump Inventory SWRCY Recycler Database HAULERS Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing INDIAN ODI Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands WMUDS/SWAT Waste Management Unit Database Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL Clandestine Drug LabsHIST Cal-Sites Historical Calsites Database SCH School Property Evaluation Program Toxic Pits Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites CDL Clandestine Drug Labs US HIST CDL National Clandestine Laboratory Register Local Land Records LIENS 2 CERCLA Lien InformationLIENSEnvironmental Liens Listing DEED Deed Restriction Listing Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS Hazardous Materials Information Reporting SystemCHMIRSCalifornia Hazardous Material Incident Report System LDS Land Disposal Sites Listing MCS Military Cleanup Sites Listing Orange Co. Industrial Site List of Industrial Site Cleanups SPILLS 90 SPILLS 90 data from FirstSearch Other Ascertainable Records DOT OPS Incident and Accident DataDODDepartment of Defense Sites FUDS Formerly Used Defense Sites CONSENT Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees ROD Records Of Decision UMTRA Uranium Mill Tailings Sites US MINES Mines Master Index File TRIS Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System TSCA Toxic Substances Control Act FTTS FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) HIST FTTS FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing SSTS Section 7 Tracking Systems ICIS Integrated Compliance Information System PADS PCB Activity Database System MLTS Material Licensing Tracking System RADINFO Radiation Information Database RAATS RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RMP Risk Management Plans EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 8 CA BOND EXP. PLAN Bond Expenditure Plan NPDES NPDES Permits Listing UIC UIC Listing Cortese "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List CUPA Listings CUPA Resources List Notify 65 Proposition 65 Records DRYCLEANERS Cleaner Facilities WIP Well Investigation Program Case List ENF Enforcement Action Listing INDIAN RESERV Indian Reservations SCRD DRYCLEANERS State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing WDS Waste Discharge System Financial Assurance Financial Assurance Information Listing PROC Certified Processors Database HWT Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database HWP EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing MWMP Medical Waste Management Program Listing LEAD SMELTERS Lead Smelter Sites US AIRS Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem EPA WATCH LIST EPA WATCH LIST US FIN ASSUR Financial Assurance Information COAL ASH EPA Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List PCB TRANSFORMER PCB Transformer Registration Database COAL ASH DOE Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data 2020 COR ACTION 2020 Corrective Action Program List PRP Potentially Responsible Parties EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas PlantsEDR US Hist Cleaners EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LUST Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage TankRGA LF Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS Surrounding sites were identified in the following databases. Elevations have been determined from the USGS Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximity should be field verified. Sites with an elevation equal to or higher than the target property have been differentiated below from sites with an elevation lower than the target property. Page numbers and map identification numbers refer to the EDR Radius Map report where detailed data on individual sites can be reviewed. Sites listed in bold italics are in multiple databases. Unmappable (orphan) sites are not considered in the foregoing analysis. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 9 STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERC-NFRAP: Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLISsites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completedand that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List(NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. A review of the CERC-NFRAP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/25/2013 has revealed that there is 1 CERC-NFRAP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT T 1000 E KATELLA ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.319 mi.) K66 122 Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supportingthe Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/ordispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-LQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/10/2015 has revealed that there are 7 RCRA-LQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1919 STATE COLLEGE B NE 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) C15 25 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ PACIFIC IMAGE, INC 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.170 mi.) F37 59 PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNO 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.170 mi.) F38 60 PACIFIC IMAGE 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRU WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.170 mi.) F39 62 APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEM 2100 E. ORANGEWOOD A SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G46 75 ACCURATE METAL SOLUT 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AV SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G48 85 PLATINUM TRIANGLE PA 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) G51 96 RCRA-SQG: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. A review of the RCRA-SQG list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/10/2015 has revealed that there are EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 10 12 RCRA-SQG sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 S STATE COLLEGE ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.012 mi.) 8 13 ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUS 1880 CHRIS LANE NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) 11 16 VETERINARY REFERENCE 1871 CHRIS LN NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.160 mi.) 30 46 CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SH 1800 TALBOT WAY N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) 36 51 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ COOPER POWER TOOLS 2000 S SANTA CRUZ ST W 0 - 1/8 (0.102 mi.) 12 20 MILLENNIUM CIRCUITS 1200 E GENE AUTRY WA WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.112 mi.) D19 29 AIRPORT COACH 917 E GENE AUTRY WY WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) D25 37 RYDER STUDENT TRANS 917 E PACIFICO WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) D26 39 LIFE FLEET 1890 S BETMOR LN NW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.127 mi.) 28 44 500 S MAIN ST ASSOC 500 530 550 600 S MA SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.133 mi.) E29 45 MER CEDES SHOP THE 1884 S SANTA CRUZ ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.165 mi.) F33 48 MALCO SERVICES 1865 S SANTA CRUZ WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.173 mi.) F40 65 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS ENVIROSTOR: The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and BrownfieldsReuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for whichthere may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: FederalSuperfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. A review of the ENVIROSTOR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/04/2015 has revealed that there are 11 ENVIROSTOR sites within approximately 1 mile of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SH 1800 TALBOT WAY N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.167 mi.) 36 51 Facility Id: 71003180 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation PLATINUM TRIANGLE 1016 EAST KATELLA AV NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.313 mi.) K63 112 Facility Id: 60001110 Status: Inactive - Action Required ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT T 1000 E KATELLA ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.319 mi.) K66 122 Facility Id: 30330009 Status: Refer: Other Agency ITASCO 2211 EAST HOWELL STR NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.549 mi.) 88 161 Facility Id: 30280129 Status: Refer: RWQCB SUPERIOR PLATING 1901 E CERRITOS AVE NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.765 mi.) 91 167 Facility Id: 71003048 Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation NEVILLE CHEMICAL 2201 CERRITOS AVE NNE 1/2 - 1 (0.883 mi.) 92 174 Facility Id: 30280120 Facility Id: 71002209 Status: Refer: RWQCB Status: Inactive - Needs Evaluation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 11 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ SILGAN PLASTICS CORP 611 EAST CERRITOS AV NW 1/2 - 1 (0.887 mi.) 93 183 Facility Id: 30300130 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency INLAND SPECIALTY CHE 2023 WEST COLLINS AV ENE 1/2 - 1 (0.894 mi.) 94 184 Facility Id: 30280305 Status: Refer: RWQCB PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GATEWAY APARTMENTS I 2020,2034,2040 & 210 SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G43 69 Facility Id: 60001900 Status: Certified THE CITY PLACE NORTH 3745 WEST CHAPMAN AV S 1/2 - 1 (0.595 mi.) 89 163 Facility Id: 30000017 Status: Refer: 1248 Local Agency PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY MOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE WSW 1/2 - 1 (0.647 mi.) 90 164 Facility Id: 30880003 Status: No Further Action State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST: The Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports contain an inventory of reportedleaking underground storage tank incidents. The data come from the State Water Resources Control Board LeakingUnderground Storage Tank Information System. A review of the LUST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/13/2015 has revealed that there are 34 LUST sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARCO #6220 1801 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) I57 102 Global ID: T0605900941 Facility Status: Case Closed ARCO #6220 1801 S STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) I59 103 Global Id: T0605900941 Status: Completed - Case Closed WESTRUX INTL 1110 E KATELLA NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.283 mi.) J61 106 Global ID: T0605901993 Facility Status: Case Closed WESTRUX INTERNATIONA 1110 E KATELLA AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.283 mi.) J62 109 Global Id: T0605901993 Status: Completed - Case Closed PLATINUM TRIANGLE 1016 EAST KATELLA AV NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.313 mi.) K63 112 Global Id: T0605900867 Status: Completed - Case Closed JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 E KATELLA AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.313 mi.) K64 117 Global ID: T0605900867 Facility Status: Case Closed CERTRON 1701 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.390 mi.) 79 144 Global Id: T0605900725 Global ID: T0605900725 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 12 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ DEL PISO BRICK COMPA 1635 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.467 mi.) P82 148 Global ID: T0605900097 Facility Status: Case Closed TEXACO OIL 1650 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.478 mi.) P83 150 Global Id: T0605900158 Global ID: T0605900158 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed STADIUM MOTORS, INC 2225 KATELLA AVE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.482 mi.) Q85 154 Global ID: T0605901337 Facility Status: Case Closed STADIUM MOTORS 2225 E KATELLA AVE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.482 mi.) Q86 157 Global Id: T0605901337 Status: Completed - Case Closed SHELL OIL PRODUCTS U 2331 KATELLA AVE., E NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.498 mi.) 87 158 Global Id: T0605919150 Global ID: T0605919150 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Preliminary site assessment underway PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ STARWOOD O.C. PORTFO 2099 STATE COLLEGE B SE 0 - 1/8 (0.107 mi.) B17 26 Global Id: T0605954086 Global ID: T0605954086 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed RYDER STUDENT BUS SE 917 GENE AUTRY AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.125 mi.) D21 32 Global ID: T0605901626 Facility Status: Case Closed LAMCOR INC 2025 ORANGEWOOD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) E22 33 Global Id: T0605900895 Global ID: T0605900895 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed RYDER STUDENT BUS SE 917 E GENE AUTRY AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) D27 43 Global Id: T0605901626 Status: Completed - Case Closed EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G44 73 Global ID: T0605901120 Facility Status: Case Closed EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G45 74 Global Id: T0605901120 Status: Completed - Case Closed PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) G50 92 Global Id: T0605902165 Global ID: T0605902165 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed STATION #8800 1818 S LEWIS ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.327 mi.) L67 125 Global Id: T0605901266 Global Id: T0605983677 Status: Completed - Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 13 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ UNOCAL #8800 1818 LEWIS NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.327 mi.) L68 129 Global Id: T060590323 Status: Completed - Case Closed TOSCO - 76 STATION # 1818 LEWIS ST NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.327 mi.) L69 130 Global ID: T0605901266 Facility Status: Case Closed TOSCO/76 SS #8800 1818 SOUTH LEWIS STR NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.327 mi.) L70 131 Global ID: T060590323 Facility Status: Case Closed C. O. THOMPSON PETRO 531 ANAHEIM BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.339 mi.) M71 132 Global Id: T0605900520 Status: Completed - Case Closed C. O. THOMPSON PETRO 531 ANAHEIM BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.339 mi.) M72 134 Global ID: T0605900520 Facility Status: Case Closed CALTRANS/C.O. THOMPS 505 ANAHEIM BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342 mi.) M73 135 Global Id: T0605901816 Status: Completed - Case Closed CLAUDE HOLT 505 004TH ST S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342 mi.) M74 136 Global ID: T0605901816 Facility Status: Case Closed JOHN DAVID INTERNATI 1858 ANAHEIM BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.347 mi.) N75 138 Global ID: T0605901679 Facility Status: Case Closed JOHN DAVID INTERNATI 1858 S ANAHEIM BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.355 mi.) N76 139 Global Id: T0605901679 Status: Completed - Case Closed TAORMINA INDUSTRIES, 300 ANAHEIM SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.361 mi.) M77 141 Global ID: T0605900956 Facility Status: Case Closed TEXACO SERVICE STATI 818 E KATELLA AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.381 mi.) 78 142 Global Id: T0605900569 Status: Completed - Case Closed WESTSIDE MATERIALS 700 KATELLA WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) O80 146 Global ID: T0605900518 Facility Status: Case Closed WESTSIDE MATERIALS 700 E KATELLA AVE WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) O81 147 Global Id: T0605900518 Status: Completed - Case Closed DANA EDWARDS 1901 MANCHESTER WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.478 mi.) 84 152 Global Id: T0605900745 Global ID: T0605900745 Status: Completed - Case Closed Facility Status: Case Closed EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 14 SLIC: SLIC Region comes from the California Regional Water Quality Control Board. A review of the SLIC list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/13/2015 has revealed that there is 1 SLIC site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BROWNCO CONSTRUCTION 1000 EAST KATELLA AV NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.319 mi.) K65 122 Global Id: T10000004434 Facility Status: Open - Site Assessment State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: The Underground Storage Tank database contains registered USTs. USTs are regulated underSubtitle I of the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). The data come from the State Water ResourcesControl Board’s Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database. A review of the UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/13/2015 has revealed that there are 10 UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 S STATE COLLEGE ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.012 mi.) 8 13 Facility Id: 6280 ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUS 1880 CHRIS LANE NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) 11 16 Facility Id: 9623 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1919 S STATE COLLEGE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) C13 23 Facility Id: 9578 ARCO FACILITY #05999 1801 S STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) I58 103 Facility Id: 9524 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ STATE COLLEGE PLAZA 2099 S STATE COLLEGE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.) B10 16 Facility Id: 9678 LAMCOR INC 2025 E ORANGEWOOD AV SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) E24 36 Facility Id: 4729 RYDER STUDENT TRANS 917 E PACIFICO WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) D26 39 Facility Id: 1586 SCOTT’S INDEPENDENT, 1885 S SANTA CRUZ ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.166 mi.) F34 50 Facility Id: 8677 EVEREST ELECTRONIC E 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AV SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G42 69 Facility Id: 587 KEESE TANK CO 1928 S ANAHEIM BLVD W 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) 55 99 Facility Id: 9932 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 15 AST: A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. A review of the AST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 08/01/2009 has revealed that there is 1 AST site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 2000 E GENE AUTRY WA E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.228 mi.) H54 99 State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and theproject proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed toprovide coverage for DTSC’s costs. A review of the VCP list, as provided by EDR, and dated 05/04/2015 has revealed that there is 1 VCP site within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ GATEWAY APARTMENTS I 2020,2034,2040 & 210 SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G43 69 Status: Certified Facility Id: 60001900 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: The Facility Inventory Database contains active and inactive underground storage tanklocations. The source is the State Water Resource Control Board. A review of the CA FID UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/31/1994 has revealed that there are 8 CA FID UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 S STATE COLLEGE ENE 0 - 1/8 (0.012 mi.) 8 13 Facility Id: 30007358 Status: A ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUS 1880 CHRIS LANE NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) 11 16 Facility Id: 30006962 Status: A SOUTHERN CALIF GAS C 1919 S STATE COLLEGE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.107 mi.) C18 29 Facility Id: 30006203 Status: A ARCO FACILITY #6220 1801 S STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) I56 99 Facility Id: 30016099 Status: A PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ STATE COLLEGE PLAZA 2099 S STATE COLLEGE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.) B9 15 Facility Id: 30017737 Status: A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 16 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RYDER STUDENT TRANS 917 E PACIFICO WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) D26 39 Facility Id: 30003263 Status: A SCOTTS INDEPENDENCE, 1885 S SANTA CRUZ WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.166 mi.) F35 50 Facility Id: 30002048 Status: A PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) G50 92 Facility Id: 30006755 Status: A HIST UST: Historical UST Registered Database. A review of the HIST UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 10/15/1990 has revealed that there are 7 HIST UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM 1919 S STATE COLLEGE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) C14 24 Facility Id: 00000007492 ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 SOUTH STATE COL E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) H52 98 Facility Id: 00000056182 CHUAN CHUN LU 1801 S STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) I60 105 Facility Id: 00000026892 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ LAMCOR INC. 2025 E ORANGEWOOD AV SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) E23 36 Facility Id: 00000052736 C O THOMPSON PETROLE 11546 ANAHEIM BLVD SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.180 mi.) 41 67 Facility Id: 00000002536 AMF ANAHEIM LLC 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AV SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G47 78 Facility Id: 00000067588 PINATA FOODS, INC. 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) G49 91 Facility Id: 00000066955 SWEEPS UST: Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. A review of the SWEEPS UST list, as provided by EDR, and dated 06/01/1994 has revealed that there are 8 SWEEPS UST sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUS 1880 CHRIS LANE NNW 0 - 1/8 (0.093 mi.) 11 16 Comp Number: 9623 Status: A Tank Status: A SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 1919 S STATE COLLEGE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) C13 23 Comp Number: 1650 Status: A Tank Status: A EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 17 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ANAHEIM STADIUM 2000 S GENE AUTRY WA E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.222 mi.) H53 98 Comp Number: 6280 ARCO FACILITY #6220 1801 S STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) I56 99 Comp Number: 4775 Status: A Tank Status: A PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ STATE COLLEGE PLAZA 2099 S STATE COLLEGE SE 0 - 1/8 (0.068 mi.) B10 16 Comp Number: 4954 Status: A Tank Status: A RYDER STUDENT TRANS 917 E PACIFICO WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) D26 39 Comp Number: 1586 Status: A Tank Status: A SCOTTS INDEPENDENCE, 1885 S SANTA CRUZ WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.166 mi.) F35 50 Comp Number: 3406 Status: A Tank Status: A PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) G50 92 Comp Number: 46 Status: A Tank Status: A Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supportingthe Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA)of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/ordispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. A review of the RCRA NonGen / NLR list, as provided by EDR, and dated 03/10/2015 has revealed that there is 1 RCRA NonGen / NLR site within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ BROWN AND CALDWELL L 1200EAST PACIFICO WNW 0 - 1/8 (0.112 mi.) D20 31 HIST CORTESE: The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. A review of the HIST CORTESE list, as provided by EDR, and dated 04/01/2001 has revealed that there are 18 HIST CORTESE sites within approximately 0.5 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ ARCO #6220 1801 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) I57 102 Reg Id: 083001205T EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 18 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ WESTRUX INTL 1110 E KATELLA NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.283 mi.) J61 106 Reg Id: 083002915T JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 E KATELLA AVE NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.313 mi.) K64 117 Reg Id: 083001097T CERTRON 1701 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.390 mi.) 79 144 Reg Id: 083000912T DEL PISO BRICK COMPA 1635 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.467 mi.) P82 148 Reg Id: 083000125T TEXACO OIL 1650 STATE COLLEGE NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.478 mi.) P83 150 Reg Id: 083000207T STADIUM MOTORS, INC 2225 KATELLA AVE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.482 mi.) Q85 154 Reg Id: 083001785T PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ RYDER STUDENT BUS SE 917 GENE AUTRY AVE WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.125 mi.) D21 32 Reg Id: 083002204T LAMCOR INC 2025 ORANGEWOOD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.126 mi.) E22 33 Reg Id: 083001135T EVEREST ELECTRONIC 2100 ORANGEWOOD SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.204 mi.) G44 73 Reg Id: 083001474T PINATA MEXICAN FOODS 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.207 mi.) G50 92 Reg Id: 083003184T UNOCAL #8800 1818 LEWIS NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.327 mi.) L68 129 Reg Id: 083001680T CALTRANS/C.O. THOMPS 505 ANAHEIM BLVD S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342 mi.) M73 135 Reg Id: 083000767T CLAUDE HOLT 505 004TH ST S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.342 mi.) M74 136 Reg Id: 083002596T JOHN DAVID INTERNATI 1858 ANAHEIM BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.347 mi.) N75 138 Reg Id: 083002305T TAORMINA INDUSTRIES, 300 ANAHEIM SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.361 mi.) M77 141 Reg Id: 083001231T WESTSIDE MATERIALS 700 KATELLA WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.441 mi.) O80 146 Reg Id: 083000648T DANA EDWARDS 1901 MANCHESTER WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.478 mi.) 84 152 Reg Id: 083000936T EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 19 listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. A review of the EDR US Hist Auto Stat list, as provided by EDR, has revealed that there are 3 EDR US Hist Auto Stat sites within approximately 0.25 miles of the target property. PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 1919 S STATE COLLEGE NE 0 - 1/8 (0.104 mi.) C16 26 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation ____________________ ________ ___________________ _____ _____ Not reported 500 N STATE COLLEGE SSE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.161 mi.) 31 48 Not reported 1884 S SANTA CRUZ ST WNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.165 mi.) F32 48 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TC4340409.2s EXECUTIVE SUMMARY 20 Due to poor or inadequate address information, the following sites were not mapped. Count: 3 records. Site Name Database(s)____________ ____________ A TOWN STADIUM NPDES ANAHEIM AUTO AFFAIR LUST ARBOR PARK APARTMENTS HAZNET EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 60 k V Na t u r a l G a s 160 1 60 160 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 2 0 1 1 6 0 EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. Na t u r a l G a s MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Proposed NPL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPL LIENS Federal Delisted NPL site list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Delisted NPL Federal CERCLIS list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500CERCLIS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500FEDERAL FACILITY Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500CERC-NFRAP Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CORRACTS Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500RCRA-TSDF Federal RCRA generators list 7 NR NR NR 6 1 0.250RCRA-LQG 12 NR NR NR 8 4 0.250RCRA-SQG 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250RCRA-CESQG Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US ENG CONTROLS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US INST CONTROL 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500LUCIS Federal ERNS list 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPERNS State- and tribal - equivalent NPL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000RESPONSE State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS 11 NR 7 2 2 0 1.000ENVIROSTOR State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWF/LF State and tribal leaking storage tank lists 34 NR NR 25 8 1 0.500LUST TC4340409.2s Page 4 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 1 NR NR 1 0 0 0.500SLIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN LUST State and tribal registered storage tank lists 10 NR NR NR 6 4 0.250UST 1 NR NR NR 1 0 0.250AST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250INDIAN UST 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250FEMA UST State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN VCP 1 NR NR 0 1 0 0.500VCP ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500US BROWNFIELDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEBRIS REGION 9 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SWRCY 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHAULERS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500INDIAN ODI 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500WMUDS/SWAT Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS CDL 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HIST Cal-Sites 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250SCH 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Toxic Pits 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCDL 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS HIST CDL Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks 8 NR NR NR 4 4 0.250CA FID UST 7 NR NR NR 6 1 0.250HIST UST 8 NR NR NR 5 3 0.250SWEEPS UST Local Land Records 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 2 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLIENS 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500DEED Records of Emergency Release Reports 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCHMIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLDS TC4340409.2s Page 5 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMCS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPOrange Co. Industrial Site 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSPILLS 90 Other Ascertainable Records 1 NR NR NR 0 1 0.250RCRA NonGen / NLR 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPDOT OPS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000DOD 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000FUDS 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CONSENT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000ROD 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500UMTRA 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250US MINES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTRIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPTSCA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPHIST FTTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPSSTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPICIS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPADS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPMLTS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRADINFO 1 NR NR NR NR NR TP 1FINDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRAATS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRMP 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000CA BOND EXP. PLAN 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPNPDES 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUIC 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500Cortese 18 NR NR 13 5 0 0.500HIST CORTESE 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250CUPA Listings 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000Notify 65 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250WIP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPENF 4 NR NR NR NR NR TP 4HAZNET 2 NR NR NR NR NR TP 2EMI 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000INDIAN RESERV 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500SCRD DRYCLEANERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPWDS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPFinancial Assurance 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500PROC 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250HWT 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000HWP 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250MWMP 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPLEAD SMELTERS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS AIRS 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPEPA WATCH LIST 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPUS FIN ASSUR 0 NR NR 0 0 0 0.500COAL ASH EPA 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPCB TRANSFORMER TC4340409.2s Page 6 MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Search TargetDistance Total Database Property(Miles) < 1/8 1/8 - 1/4 1/4 - 1/2 1/2 - 1 > 1 Plotted 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPCOAL ASH DOE 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.2502020 COR ACTION 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPPRP EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records 0 NR 0 0 0 0 1.000EDR MGP 3 NR NR NR 2 1 0.250EDR US Hist Auto Stat 0 NR NR NR 0 0 0.250EDR US Hist Cleaners EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LUST 0 NR NR NR NR NR TPRGA LF 130 0 7 42 54 20 7- Totals -- NOTES: TP = Target Property NR = Not Requested at this Search Distance Sites may be listed in more than one database TC4340409.2s Page 7 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: .4000Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080022148TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAC001207392GEPAID: 1995Year: S112874119envid: OrangeFacility County: .0625Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD000088252TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAC001207392GEPAID: 1995Year: S112874119envid: HAZNET: Site 1 of 7 in cluster A Actual: 147 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Target 1800 GENE AUTRY N/A A1 HAZNETD & F INDUSTRIES S112874119 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 25Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 25Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2099SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 54658Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: EMI: Site 2 of 7 in cluster A Actual: 147 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Target 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY N/A A2 EMID & F INDUSTRIES S106829647 TC4340409.2s Page 8 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: D & F INDUSTRIES (Continued)S106829647 OrangeFacility County: 0.22Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147657180Telephone: RON HOOVER QA MANAGERContact: CAL000157643GEPAID: 2001Year: S113084237envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.36Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147657180Telephone: RON HOOVER QA MANAGERContact: CAL000157643GEPAID: 2002Year: S113084237envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.36Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147657180Telephone: RON HOOVER QA MANAGERContact: CAL000157643GEPAID: 2003Year: S113084237envid: HAZNET: Site 3 of 7 in cluster A Actual: 147 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Target 1800 EAST GENE AUTRY WAY N/A A3 HAZNETD & F INDUSTRIES S113084237 TC4340409.2s Page 9 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: 0.12Tons: Treatment, TankDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus inorganicsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147657180Telephone: RON HOOVER QA MANAGERContact: CAL000157643GEPAID: 2000Year: S113084237envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.22Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008302903TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147657180Telephone: RON HOOVER QA MANAGERContact: CAL000157643GEPAID: 2001Year: S113084237envid: D & F INDUSTRIES (Continued)S113084237 CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY Environmental Interest/Information System 110021343875Registry ID: FINDS: Site 4 of 7 in cluster A Actual: 147 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Target 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY N/A A4 FINDSNBTY MANUFACTURING LLC 1008241638 TC4340409.2s Page 10 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2011Year: S113127613envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.24Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Liquids with halogenated organic compounds >= 1,000 Mg./LWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147658375Telephone: LUCHO LOPEZ-PLANT MANAGERContact: CAL000273102GEPAID: 2011Year: S113127613envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.115Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147658375Telephone: LUCHO LOPEZ-PLANT MANAGERContact: CAL000273102GEPAID: 2011Year: S113127613envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.0225Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: TXD077603371TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147658375Telephone: LUCHO LOPEZ-PLANT MANAGERContact: CAL000273102GEPAID: 2011Year: S113127613envid: HAZNET: Site 5 of 7 in cluster A Actual: 147 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Target 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY N/A A5 HAZNETNBTY MANUFACTURING LLC S113127613 TC4340409.2s Page 11 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 16 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: 0.05Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: TXD077603371TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147658375Telephone: LUCHO LOPEZ-PLANT MANAGERContact: CAL000273102GEPAID: 2011Year: S113127613envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.2Tons: Include On-Site Treatment And/Or Stabilization) Landfill Or Surface Impoundment That Will Be Closed As Landfill( ToDisposal Method: Latex wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: NVT330010000TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056724Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147658375Telephone: LUCHO LOPEZ-PLANT MANAGERContact: CAL000273102GEPAID: NBTY MANUFACTURING LLC (Continued) S113127613 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 18Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 26Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: BConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: YCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2099SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 129259Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: EMI: Site 6 of 7 in cluster A Actual: 147 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92805 Target 1800 GENE AUTRY WAY N/A A6 EMINBTY MANUFACTURING,LLC S106836204 TC4340409.2s Page 12 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: 0.45Tons: Treatment, TankDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008364432TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928070000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1800 GENE AUTRY WYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7147657701Telephone: BILL MAXFIELD-SAFETY MGRContact: CAL000237945GEPAID: 2002Year: S113116497envid: HAZNET: Site 7 of 7 in cluster A Actual: 147 ft. Property ANAHEIM, CA 92807 Target 1800 GENE AUTRY WY N/A A7 HAZNETNBTY MANUFACTURING LLC S113116497 Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: MunicipalLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: ANAHEIM CITY OFOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 533-5767Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2000 S STATE COLLEGE BLVDContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: CAD982431736EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2000 S STATE COLLEGE BLVDFacility address: ANAHEIM STADIUMFacility name: 09/04/1990Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 63 ft. 0.012 mi.UST Relative: Higher Actual: 148 ft. < 1/8 CA FID USTANAHEIM, CA 92806 ENE FINDS2000 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD CAD982431736 8 RCRA-SQGANAHEIM STADIUM 1000455655 TC4340409.2s Page 13 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30007358Facility ID: CA FID UST: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) and settlements. regions and states with cooperative agreements, enforcement actions, Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA). The system tracks inspections in Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) and the NCDB (National Compliance Data Base) supports implementation of the Environmental Interest/Information System 110002810398Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: MunicipalLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: ANAHEIM STADIUM (Continued)1000455655 TC4340409.2s Page 14 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation -117.8876446Longitude: 33.7985946Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 6280Facility ID: UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92806Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 200 S ANAHEIM BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7152543100Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: ANAHEIM STADIUM (Continued)1000455655 ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92806Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 28 BROOKHOLLOW STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: Not reportedFacility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30017737Facility ID: CA FID UST: 361 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster B 0.068 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE 2099 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A B9 CA FID USTSTATE COLLEGE PLAZA S101589612 TC4340409.2s Page 15 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: GASHOLContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 550Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004954-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 772Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 4954Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: -117.887788Longitude: 33.7977431Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 9678Facility ID: UST: 361 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster B 0.068 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE SWEEPS UST2099 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A B10 USTSTATE COLLEGE PLAZA U003984208 waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: Facility is not located on Indian land. Additional information is not known.Land type: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 CHRIS LANEMailing address: CAD981662760EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1880 CHRIS LANEFacility address: ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES INCFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: EMI HAZNET 489 ft.SWEEPS UST 0.093 mi.UST Relative: Higher Actual: 148 ft. < 1/8 CA FID USTANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNW FINDS1880 CHRIS LANE CAD981662760 11 RCRA-SQGROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES INC 1000273458 TC4340409.2s Page 16 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002416724Registry ID: FINDS: State Contractor/GranteeEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 08/30/1994Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: ANGELO PEYKOFFOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES INC (Continued) 1000273458 TC4340409.2s Page 17 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact: CAD981662760GEPAID: 1997Year: 1000273458envid: HAZNET: 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-17-92Active Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-009623-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 07-17-92Action Date: 07-17-92Referral Date: 44-016771Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 9623Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: -117.89218Longitude: 33.80099Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 9623Facility ID: UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92805Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 10260 MATERN PLMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146348600Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30006962Facility ID: CA FID UST: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES INC (Continued) 1000273458 TC4340409.2s Page 18 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 8Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5149SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2089Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 12Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5149SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2089Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2082SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2089Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: OrangeFacility County: 1.6680Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Tank bottom wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1880 CHRIS LANEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES INC (Continued)1000273458 TC4340409.2s Page 19 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 8Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5149SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 2089Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 2Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: ROCKY MOUNTAIN INDUSTRIES INC (Continued) 1000273458 OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (803) 359-1200Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: LEXINGTON, SC 29701 670 INDUSTRIAL DR BOX 1410Owner/operator address: COOPER POWER TOOLSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 712-5800Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 928056816 2000 S SANTA CRUZ STContact address: GLENN ANDERSONContact: CAR000038653EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 928056816 2000 S SANTA CRUZ STFacility address: COOPER POWER TOOLSFacility name: 01/22/1999Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 537 ft. 0.102 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. < 1/8 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92805 West FINDS2000 S SANTA CRUZ ST CAR000038653 12 RCRA-SQGCOOPER POWER TOOLS 1001217640 TC4340409.2s Page 20 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002921893Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: TRICHLORETHYLENE. Waste name: D040. Waste code: TETRACHLOROETHYLENE. Waste name: D039. Waste code: 1,4-DICHLOROBENZENE. Waste name: D027. Waste code: BENZENE. Waste name: D018. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Not Defined. Waste name: D000. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: COOPER POWER TOOLS (Continued) 1001217640 TC4340409.2s Page 21 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation --Telephone: GLENN S ANDERSONContact: CAR000038653GEPAID: 2001Year: 1001217640envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.084Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056816Mailing City,St,Zip: 2000 S SANTA CRUZ STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: GLENN S ANDERSONContact: CAR000038653GEPAID: 2008Year: 1001217640envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.0714Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056816Mailing City,St,Zip: 2000 S SANTA CRUZ STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: GLENN S ANDERSONContact: CAR000038653GEPAID: 2009Year: 1001217640envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.084Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056816Mailing City,St,Zip: 2000 S SANTA CRUZ STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 8033591200Telephone: GLENN S ANDERSONContact: CAR000038653GEPAID: 2010Year: 1001217640envid: HAZNET: COOPER POWER TOOLS (Continued)1001217640 TC4340409.2s Page 22 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: 0.81Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056816Mailing City,St,Zip: 2000 S SANTA CRUZ STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: GLENN S ANDERSONContact: CAR000038653GEPAID: 2000Year: 1001217640envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.08Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Aqueous solution with total organic residues less than 10 percentWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613893TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056816Mailing City,St,Zip: 2000 S SANTA CRUZ STMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: COOPER POWER TOOLS (Continued) 1001217640 PSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: Not reportedCapacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001650-000002SWRCB Tank Id: 241Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1650Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: -117.888114Longitude: 33.8020202Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 9578Facility ID: UST: 551 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster C 0.104 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NE SWEEPS UST1919 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A C13 USTSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY U003779239 TC4340409.2s Page 23 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 12000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001650-000005SWRCB Tank Id: 241Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1650Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 2Number Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS COMPANY (Continued) U003779239 DOCU102Container Num: 003Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 6Container Construction Thickness: 0Type of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000300Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: DOCU101Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 12Container Construction Thickness: 5Type of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000500Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: DOCU100Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90051Owner City,St,Zip: BOX 3249 TERMINAL ANNEXOwner Address: SOUTHERN CALIF. GAS COMPANYOwner Name: 7146343148Telephone: J. F. MAPESContact Name: PUBLIC UTILITYOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000007492Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 551 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster C 0.104 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NE 1919 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A C14 HIST USTANAHEIM U001578823 TC4340409.2s Page 24 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock InventorLeak Detection: .25Container Construction Thickness: 1Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: ANAHEIM (Continued)U001578823 NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (213) 689-3968Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: SUNG W LEEContact: LOS ANGELES, CA 90051 M.L. 211F PO BOX 3249 TERMINAL ANNEXMailing address: CAD981422702EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 1919 STATE COLLEGE BLVD.Facility address: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.Facility name: 04/03/1991Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 551 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster C 0.104 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NE 1919 STATE COLLEGE BLVD.CAD981422702 C15 RCRA-LQGSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO.1007199353 TC4340409.2s Page 25 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GAS CO. (Continued) 1007199353 1919 S STATE COLLEGE BLVDAddress: 2001Year: SO CALIFORNIA GAS COName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 551 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster C 0.104 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NE 1919 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A C16 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 1015292467 RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: Ken WilliamsContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605954086Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605954086Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003938TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 05/14/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.889903Longitude: 33.796523Latitude: T0605954086Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 563 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster B 0.107 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE 2099 STATE COLLEGE BLVD., S. N/A B17 LUSTSTARWOOD O.C. PORTFOLIO VII, L.L.C. S106387431 TC4340409.2s Page 26 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: File reviewAction: 10/17/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605954086Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 11/21/2002Date: OtherAction Type: T0605954086Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 09/27/2002Date: OtherAction Type: T0605954086Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/27/2002Date: OtherAction Type: T0605954086Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/14/2003Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605954086Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 01/29/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605954086Global Id: 01/14/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605954086Global Id: 09/27/2002Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605954086Global Id: 09/27/2002Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605954086Global Id: 05/14/2003Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605954086Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: kwilliams@waterboards.ca.govEmail: STARWOOD O.C. PORTFOLIO VII, L.L.C. (Continued) S106387431 TC4340409.2s Page 27 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: RMStaff Initials: Not reportedStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 1/29/2003Date Pollution Characterization Began: 1/14/2003Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 5/14/2003Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/27/2002Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/27/2002How Stopped Date: T0605954086Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: ORANGEWOOD AVE.Cross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003938TCase Number: STARWOOD O.C. PORTFOLIO VII, L.L.C. (Continued)S106387431 TC4340409.2s Page 28 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92805Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: P O BOXMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146343167Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30006203Facility ID: CA FID UST: 567 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster C 0.107 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NE 1919 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A C18 CA FID USTSOUTHERN CALIF GAS CO S101589319 OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 385-1690Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1200 E GENE AUTRY WAYOwner/operator address: JOSE NARANJOOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 385-1690Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1200 E GENE AUTRY WAYContact address: JOSE NARANJOContact: CAR000088914EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1200 E GENE AUTRY WAYFacility address: MILLENNIUM CIRCUITSFacility name: 12/22/2000Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 592 ft. Site 1 of 6 in cluster D 0.112 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW FINDS1200 E GENE AUTRY WAY CAR000088914 D19 RCRA-SQGMILLENNIUM CIRCUITS 1004676745 TC4340409.2s Page 29 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110012221924Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: MILLENNIUM CIRCUITSSite name: 12/22/2000Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name: D003. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: MILLENNIUM CIRCUITS (Continued) 1004676745 TC4340409.2s Page 30 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1250 E GENE AUTRY WYOwner/operator address: LITTON INDUSTRIESOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 937-1094Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1250 E GENE AUTRY WYContact address: ELIZABETH WINGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1250 E GENE AUTRY WYMailing address: CAD981398316EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1200 PACIFICO AVEFacility address: CORE LABORATORIES INCFacility name: 09/05/1997Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 592 ft. Site 2 of 6 in cluster D 0.112 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW FINDS1200EAST PACIFICO CAD981398316 D20 RCRA NonGen / NLRBROWN AND CALDWELL LABORATORY 1000197358 TC4340409.2s Page 31 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002693620Registry ID: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008280341Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: CORE LABORATORIES INCSite name: 04/22/1986Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: BROWN AND CALDWELL LABORATORY (Continued) 1000197358 Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002204TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083002204TReg Id: LINKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 661 ft. Site 3 of 6 in cluster D 0.125 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW LUST917 GENE AUTRY AVE N/A D21 HIST CORTESERYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE S105022500 TC4340409.2s Page 32 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8976483Longitude: 33.7998222Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 3/16/1993Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 10/24/1996Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 8/12/1991Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 3/16/1993Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901626Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: RYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE (Continued) S105022500 083001135TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 664 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster E 0.126 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE LUST2025 ORANGEWOOD N/A E22 HIST CORTESELAMCOR INC S104160991 TC4340409.2s Page 33 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OtherAction Type: T0605900895Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/12/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900895Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/04/1989Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900895Global Id: 12/12/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900895Global Id: Status History: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900895Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900895Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 89UT017LOC Case Number: 083001135TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 04/04/1989Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8784699Longitude: 33.7958244Latitude: T0605900895Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: LAMCOR INC (Continued)S104160991 TC4340409.2s Page 34 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8886039Longitude: 33.7963363Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 4/4/1989Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 12/12/1988Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900895Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 89UT017Local Case Num: 083001135TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak ReportedAction: 12/12/1988Date: LAMCOR INC (Continued)S104160991 TC4340409.2s Page 35 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: LAMCOR INC (Continued)S104160991 NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 2Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: 1979Year Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0002Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92806Owner City,St,Zip: 2025 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE.Owner Address: LAMCOR INC.Owner Name: 7146342950Telephone: DOUGLAS MELUGINContact Name: ELECTRICAL MFG.Other Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000052736Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 664 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster E 0.126 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE 2025 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A E23 HIST USTLAMCOR INC.U001578861 -117.886651Longitude: 33.797844Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 4729Facility ID: UST: 664 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster E 0.126 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE 2025 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A E24 USTLAMCOR INC U003659470 TC4340409.2s Page 36 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 938-8900Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 354 W CERRITOS BLDG 7 STE 350Owner/operator address: AIRPORT COACHOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 938-8900Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 917 E GENE AUTRY WYContact address: PAUL WIGGINSContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 E GENE AUTRY WYMailing address: CAD983657537EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 917 E GENE AUTRY WYFacility address: AIRPORT COACHFacility name: 01/25/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 666 ft. Site 4 of 6 in cluster D 0.126 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW FINDS917 E GENE AUTRY WY CAD983657537 D25 RCRA-SQGAIRPORT COACH 1000819753 TC4340409.2s Page 37 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056711Mailing City,St,Zip: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149388900Telephone: DEBRA PITT-MAINT MGRContact: CAD983657537GEPAID: 2002Year: 1000819753envid: OrangeFacility County: 6.71Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981696420TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056711Mailing City,St,Zip: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149388900Telephone: DEBRA PITT-MAINT MGRContact: CAD983657537GEPAID: 2002Year: 1000819753envid: OrangeFacility County: 6.71Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Unspecified oil-containing wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD981696420TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056711Mailing City,St,Zip: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149388900Telephone: DEBRA PITT-MAINT MGRContact: CAD983657537GEPAID: 2002Year: 1000819753envid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002891256Registry ID: FINDS: AIRPORT COACH (Continued)1000819753 TC4340409.2s Page 38 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 19 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: 57.82Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Other organic solidsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056711Mailing City,St,Zip: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149388900Telephone: DEBRA PITT-MAINT MGRContact: CAD983657537GEPAID: 2002Year: 1000819753envid: OrangeFacility County: 1.04Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Oil/water separation sludgeWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928056711Mailing City,St,Zip: 917 E GENE AUTRY WAYMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149388900Telephone: DEBRA PITT-MAINT MGRContact: CAD983657537GEPAID: 2002Year: 1000819753envid: OrangeFacility County: 1.04Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Oil/water separation sludgeWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: AIRPORT COACH (Continued)1000819753 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 917 E PACIFICOContact address: MIKE LUKEContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 E PACIFICOMailing address: CAD982048316EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 917 E PACIFICOFacility address: RYDER STUDENT TRANSFacility name: 07/18/1991Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 666 ft.SWEEPS USTSite 5 of 6 in cluster D 0.126 mi.UST Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 CA FID USTANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW FINDS917 E PACIFICO CAD982048316 D26 RCRA-SQGRYDER STUDENT TRANS 1000290760 TC4340409.2s Page 39 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002787761Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: RYDER STUDENT TRANSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 634-2313Contact telephone: USContact country: RYDER STUDENT TRANS (Continued) 1000290760 TC4340409.2s Page 40 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1586Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 5Number Of Tanks: JET FUELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001586-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 1632Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1586Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: -117.9085Longitude: 33.83507Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 1586Facility ID: UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92805Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 917 E PACIFICOMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7145218714Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30003263Facility ID: CA FID UST: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RYDER STUDENT TRANS (Continued) 1000290760 TC4340409.2s Page 41 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedActive Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001586-000010SWRCB Tank Id: 1632Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1586Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: GASHOLContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001586-000009SWRCB Tank Id: 1632Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1586Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: GASHOLContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001586-000007SWRCB Tank Id: 1632Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 02-11-92Action Date: 02-11-92Referral Date: Not reportedBoard Of Equalization: 9Number: 1586Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-001586-000006SWRCB Tank Id: 1632Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: RYDER STUDENT TRANS (Continued)1000290760 TC4340409.2s Page 42 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: RYDER STUDENT TRANS (Continued) 1000290760 08/12/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901626Global Id: 08/12/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901626Global Id: Status History: 9517824903Phone Number: vjahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901626Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901626Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002204TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 10/24/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.897234Longitude: 33.801165Latitude: T0605901626Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 666 ft. Site 6 of 6 in cluster D 0.126 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW 917 E GENE AUTRY AVE N/A D27 LUSTRYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE S109284159 TC4340409.2s Page 43 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 01/28/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901626Global Id: Clean Up Fund - Case Closure Review Summary Report (RSR)Action: 10/24/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901626Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 10/24/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901626Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/24/1996Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901626Global Id: RYDER STUDENT BUS SERVICE (Continued) S109284159 OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 939-8101Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1890 S BETMOR LNOwner/operator address: LIFE FLEETOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 939-8101Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1890 S BETMOR LNContact address: BRAD JONESContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 S BETMOR LNMailing address: CA0000133082EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1890 S BETMOR LNFacility address: LIFE FLEETFacility name: 02/11/1994Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 673 ft. 0.127 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 146 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW FINDS1890 S BETMOR LN CA0000133082 28 RCRA-SQGLIFE FLEET 1000886194 TC4340409.2s Page 44 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002613253Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: LIFE FLEET (Continued)1000886194 waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 547-0800Contact telephone: USContact country: ORANGE, CA 92668 500 S MAIN ST NO 101Contact address: STEVE BARNETTContact: CAD983646605EPA ID: ORANGE, CA 92868 AND 1518 LA VETA ST 500 530 550 600 S MAIN STFacility address: 500 S MAIN ST ASSOC INCFacility name: 02/11/1994Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 704 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster E 0.133 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92868 SE FINDS500 530 550 600 S MAIN ST CAD983646605 E29 RCRA-SQG500 S MAIN ST ASSOC INC 1000818750 TC4340409.2s Page 45 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110008283981Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 547-0800Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ORANGE, CA 92668 500 S MAIN ST NO 101Owner/operator address: 500 S MAIN ST ASSOCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous 500 S MAIN ST ASSOC INC (Continued) 1000818750 1871 CHRIS LNFacility address: VETERINARY REFERENCE LABORATORYFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 843 ft. 0.160 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 148 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNW FINDS1871 CHRIS LN CAD981991003 30 RCRA-SQGVETERINARY REFERENCE LABORATORY 1000215385 TC4340409.2s Page 46 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: ANIMED COMPANYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 CHRIS LNMailing address: CAD981991003EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 VETERINARY REFERENCE LABORATORY (Continued) 1000215385 TC4340409.2s Page 47 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002768728Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: VETERINARY REFERENCE LABORATORY (Continued) 1000215385 500 N STATE COLLEGE BLVDAddress: 2003Year: IMAGE AUTO DETAILINGName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 851 ft. 0.161 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 143 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92868 SSE 500 N STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A 31 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 1015522780 1884 S SANTA CRUZ STAddress: 2010Year: EXECUTIVE BMW SVC & REPAIRName: EDR Historical Auto Stations: 869 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster F 0.165 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW 1884 S SANTA CRUZ ST N/A F32 EDR US Hist Auto Stat 1015287429 Not reportedContact email: (714) 978-9889Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1884 S SANTA CRUZ STE BContact address: PRESTON GREGContact: CAD983588153EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1884 S SANTA CRUZ STE BFacility address: MER CEDES SHOP THEFacility name: 07/05/1991Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 869 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster F 0.165 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW FINDS1884 S SANTA CRUZ STE B CAD983588153 F33 RCRA-SQGMER CEDES SHOP THE 1000594929 TC4340409.2s Page 48 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002848429Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: ON THE BALL TYPESETTINGOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: MER CEDES SHOP THE (Continued) 1000594929 TC4340409.2s Page 49 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and MER CEDES SHOP THE (Continued) 1000594929 -117.895209Longitude: 33.8019742Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 8677Facility ID: UST: 878 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster F 0.166 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW 1885 S SANTA CRUZ ST N/A F34 USTSCOTT’S INDEPENDENT, INC.U003804991 WSTG: OILTank Use: 04-14-93Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003406-000001SWRCB Tank Id: S03858Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-14-93Referral Date: 44-016042Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 3406Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92805Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1885 S SANTA CRUZ STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146342027Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30002048Facility ID: CA FID UST: 878 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster F 0.166 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW SWEEPS UST1885 S SANTA CRUZ N/A F35 CA FID USTSCOTTS INDEPENDENCE, INC.S101589164 TC4340409.2s Page 50 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: JET FUELContent: WSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003406-000009SWRCB Tank Id: 874Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-14-93Referral Date: 44-016042Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 3406Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: Not reportedContent: PSTG: UNKNOWNTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: Not reportedCapacity: ATank Status: 30-011-003406-000006SWRCB Tank Id: 874Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 04-14-93Referral Date: 44-016042Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 3406Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: WASTE OILContent: SCOTTS INDEPENDENCE, INC. (Continued) S101589164 Not reportedContact email: (714) 939-9640Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1800 TALBOT WYContact address: RICHARD PRICEContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 TALBOT WYMailing address: CAD983657685EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1800 TALBOT WYFacility address: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INCFacility name: 01/26/1993Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: WDS 884 ft.ENVIROSTOR 0.167 mi.EMI Relative: Higher Actual: 149 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92805 North FINDS1800 TALBOT WAY CAD983657685 36 RCRA-SQGCALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC 1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 51 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CRITERIA AND HAZARDOUS AIR POLLUTANT INVENTORY corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002418081Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (310) 537-0959Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: RANCHO DOMINGUEZ, CA 90220 18710 S WILMINGTON AVE STE 200Owner/operator address: CARSON ESTATE COOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued) 1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 52 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: 18.5565Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Alkaline solution (pH >= 12.5) with metalsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD097030993TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: 1.33Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: 5.175Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2008Year: 1000819768envid: HAZNET: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 53 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1993Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 81260Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: 15 additional CA_HAZNET: record(s) in the EDR Site Report. Click this hyperlink while viewing on your computer to access OrangeFacility County: 0.6Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080033681TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7149399640Telephone: EMERIO MEDINAContact: CAD983657685GEPAID: 2005Year: 1000819768envid: OrangeFacility County: 5.95Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other inorganic solid wasteWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD097030993TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: CHINO, CA 917100000Mailing City,St,Zip: 5051 EDISON AVENUEMailing Address: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued) 1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 54 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1997Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1996Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1995Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 55 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2000Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1999Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 2Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 2Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 94955Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1998Year: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 56 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 04/18/2001Completed Date: Phase 1 Non-SubmittalCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003180Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002418081Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD983657685Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8901Longitude: 33.80222Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71003180Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 1Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued)1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 57 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation dairy waste ponds. dischargers having waste storage systems with land disposal such as disposal systems, such as septic systems with subsurface disposal, or management practices, facilities with passive waste treatment and cooling water dischargers or thosewho must comply through best Category C - Facilities having no waste treatment systems, such asComplexity: represent no threat to water quality. Level. A Zero (0) may be used to code those NURDS that are found to considered a minor threat to water quality unless coded at a higher to a major or minor threat. Not: All nurds without a TTWQ will be should cause a relatively minor impairment of beneficial uses compared Minor Threat to Water Quality. A violation of a regional board orderTreat To Water: Not reportedPOTW: Not reportedReclamation: 0Baseline Flow: 0Design Flow: Not reportedSecondary Waste Type: Not reportedSecondary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedWaste2: Not reportedWaste Type2: Not reportedPrimary Waste: Not reportedPrimary Waste Type: Not reportedSIC Code 2: 3479SIC Code: PrivateAgency Type: 7149399640Agency Telephone: TED LEBLANCAgency Contact: ANAHEIM 92805Agency City,St,Zip: 1800 E TALBOT WAYAgency Address: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INCAgency Name: TED LEBLANCFacility Contact: 7149399640Facility Telephone: 8Subregion: are assigned by the Regional Board CAS000001 The 1st 2 characters designate the state. The remaining 7NPDES Number: under Waste Discharge Requirements. Active - Any facility with a continuous or seasonal discharge that isFacility Status: pumping. repairing, oil production, storage and disposal operations, water washing, geothermal operations, air conditioning, ship building and processing operation of whatever nature, including mining, gravel semisolid wastes from any servicing, producing, manufacturing or Industrial - Facility that treats and/or disposes of liquid orFacility Type: Santa Ana River 30I014758Facility ID: WDS: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: CALIFORNIA CUSTOM SHAPES INC (Continued) 1000819768 TC4340409.2s Page 58 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT AOwner/operator address: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 11/11/1993Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/11/1993Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: N/AContact email: (714) 978-6691Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: ALEX GODINEZContact: CAO000047258EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT AFacility address: PACIFIC IMAGE, INCFacility name: 02/27/2008Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 896 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster F 0.170 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT A CAO000047258 F37 RCRA-LQGPACIFIC IMAGE, INC 1010313388 TC4340409.2s Page 59 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCSite name: 02/24/2005Date form received by agency: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: 792. Waste name: 792. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCSite name: 02/24/2005Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/11/1993Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: PACIFIC IMAGE, INC (Continued)1010313388 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ STREETContact address: ALEX GODINEZContact: ANAHEIM, CA 928056726 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ STREETMailing address: CA0000042758EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 928056726 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ STREETFacility address: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCFacility name: 02/20/2013Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 896 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster F 0.170 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ STREET CA0000042758 F38 RCRA-LQGPACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC 1016139869 TC4340409.2s Page 60 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/05/2002Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGYOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/05/2002Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 978-6691Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ STREETOwner/operator address: CAROLINA GODINEZOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: NATelephone ext.: (714) 978-6691Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 928056726 PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC (Continued) 1016139869 TC4340409.2s Page 61 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation No violations foundViolation Status: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: 792. Waste name: 792. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INC (Continued) 1016139869 Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/11/1993Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 978-6691Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT AOwner/operator address: PACFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: N/AContact email: N/ATelephone ext.: (714) 978-6691Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT AContact address: ALEX GODINEZContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT AMailing address: CA0000047258EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT AFacility address: PACIFIC IMAGEFacility name: 06/03/2010Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 896 ft. Site 7 of 8 in cluster F 0.170 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW 1875 SOUTH SANTA CRUZ, UNIT A CA0000047258 F39 RCRA-LQGPACIFIC IMAGE 1000857118 TC4340409.2s Page 62 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D002. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCSite name: 02/24/2005Date form received by agency: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGYSite name: 02/27/2008Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: 792. Waste name: 792. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/11/1993Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: PACFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 871-1631Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: FULLERTON, CA 92632 912 S WASHINGTON AVEOwner/operator address: IGNACIO GODINEZOwner/operator name: PACIFIC IMAGE (Continued)1000857118 TC4340409.2s Page 63 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: EPA Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 11/09/2005 Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: EPAViolation lead agency: 10/20/2005Date achieved compliance: 10/20/2005Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 03/30/2010Date achieved compliance: 03/30/2010Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE COMPANYSite name: 02/26/1996Date form received by agency: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE COSite name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE COMPANYSite name: 03/04/1999Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE COMPANYSite name: 10/12/2000Date form received by agency: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE THECHNOLOGY INCSite name: 03/06/2002Date form received by agency: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PACIFIC IMAGE TECHNOLOGY, INCSite name: 02/19/2004Date form received by agency: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: PACIFIC IMAGE (Continued)1000857118 TC4340409.2s Page 64 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPAEvaluation lead agency: 10/20/2005Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 10/20/2005Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 03/30/2010Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/30/2010Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: PACIFIC IMAGE (Continued)1000857118 NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 634-1060Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1865 SO SANTA CRUZOwner/operator address: BUDDY MALONEOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 634-1060Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1865 SO SANTA CRUZContact address: MIKE STENNERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1865 SO SANTA CRUZMailing address: CAR000053223EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1865 S SANTA CRUZFacility address: MALCO SERVICESFacility name: 06/10/1999Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: 916 ft. Site 8 of 8 in cluster F 0.173 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW FINDS1865 S SANTA CRUZ CAR000053223 F40 RCRA-SQGMALCO SERVICES 1001486908 TC4340409.2s Page 65 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1865 SO SANTA CRUZMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: BUDDY MALONEContact: CAR000053223GEPAID: 1999Year: 1001486908envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.1Tons: Treatment, TankDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1865 SO SANTA CRUZMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: --Telephone: BUDDY MALONEContact: CAR000053223GEPAID: 2000Year: 1001486908envid: HAZNET: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002928360Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: MALCO SERVICES (Continued)1001486908 TC4340409.2s Page 66 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: 1.8500Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Unspecified solvent mixtureWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD028409019TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1865 SO SANTA CRUZMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: BUDDY MALONEContact: CAR000053223GEPAID: 1999Year: 1001486908envid: OrangeFacility County: .1834Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: MALCO SERVICES (Continued)1001486908 NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: B-21Container Num: 002Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: B-20Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0010Total Tanks: ORANGE, CA 92666Owner City,St,Zip: 11546 S ANAHEIM BLVDOwner Address: C O THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO., INOwner Name: 7146344214Telephone: MICHAEL C THOMPSONContact Name: STORAGE, OFFICES, PAOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000002536Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 949 ft. 0.180 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 143 ft. 1/8-1/4 ORANGE, CA 92666 SSW 11546 ANAHEIM BLVD N/A 41 HIST USTC O THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO INC U001577514 TC4340409.2s Page 67 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1974Year Installed: B-12Container Num: 009Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00005000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: B-11Container Num: 008Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1974Year Installed: B-10Container Num: 007Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: B-9Container Num: 006Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001043Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: B-8Container Num: 005Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: 06Type of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002086Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: B-7Container Num: 004Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00003130Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: B-6Container Num: 003Tank Num: C O THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO INC (Continued)U001577514 TC4340409.2s Page 68 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1983Year Installed: B-14Container Num: 010Tank Num: NoneLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: C O THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO INC (Continued) U001577514 -117.8859695Longitude: 33.7966387Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 587Facility ID: UST: 1077 ft. Site 1 of 10 in cluster G 0.204 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A G42 USTEVEREST ELECTRONIC EQUIP INC U003879485 083-271-15, 083-271-21APN: 33.79541 / -117.8869Lat/Long: Responsible PartyFunding: NORestricted Use: 09/16/2014Status Date: CertifiedStatus: CLRRA Liability Immunity (AB 389)Special Programs Code: 34Senate: 69Assembly: 401646Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Emad YemutSupervisor: Hossein NassiriProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 6.2Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detail: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 60001900Facility ID: VCP: 1077 ft. Site 2 of 10 in cluster G 0.204 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE ENVIROSTOR2020,2034,2040 & 2100 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE N/A G43 VCPGATEWAY APARTMENTS II S113804697 TC4340409.2s Page 69 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CLRRA Agreement executed.Comments: 07/01/2013Completed Date: California Land Reuse and Revitalization AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/11/2014Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/06/2014Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/11/2013Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/08/2013Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/17/2013Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Environmental Assessment. Based on DTSC’s comments RP submitted Workplan for SubsurfaceComments: 09/09/2013Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001900Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401646Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-271-21Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-271-15Alias Name: UEPotential Description: 30019Confirmed COC: 30019Potential COC: NONEPast Use: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued) S113804697 TC4340409.2s Page 70 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation APNAlias Type: 083-271-15Alias Name: UEPotential Description: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHsConfirmed COC: Polynuclear aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHsPotential COC: NONEPast Use: 083-271-15, 083-271-21APN: -117.8869Longitude: 33.79541Latitude: Responsible PartyFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: CLRRA Liability Immunity (AB 389)Special Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Emad YemutSupervisor: Hossein NassiriProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 6.2Acres: Voluntary CleanupSite Type Detailed: Voluntary CleanupSite Type: 401646Site Code: 09/16/2014Status Date: CertifiedStatus: 60001900Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: and closeout once final payment is received. Closeout Site Code and Notification to Billing to send final invoiceComments: 10/09/2014Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/16/2014Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Post mitigation site visitComments: 05/05/2014Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued)S113804697 TC4340409.2s Page 71 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Post mitigation site visitComments: 05/05/2014Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: CLRRA Agreement executed.Comments: 07/01/2013Completed Date: California Land Reuse and Revitalization AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/11/2014Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 02/06/2014Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 12/11/2013Completed Date: Other ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 10/08/2013Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/17/2013Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Environmental Assessment. Based on DTSC’s comments RP submitted Workplan for SubsurfaceComments: 09/09/2013Completed Date: Phase 1Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001900Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 401646Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-271-21Alias Name: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued) S113804697 TC4340409.2s Page 72 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: and closeout once final payment is received. Closeout Site Code and Notification to Billing to send final invoiceComments: 10/09/2014Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 09/16/2014Completed Date: CertificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: GATEWAY APARTMENTS II (Continued) S113804697 Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605901120Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT090Local Case Num: 083001474TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083001474TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1077 ft. Site 3 of 10 in cluster G 0.204 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE LUST2100 ORANGEWOOD N/A G44 HIST CORTESEEVEREST ELECTRONIC 1001615095 TC4340409.2s Page 73 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8868549Longitude: 33.7960243Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 8/9/1990Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 4/5/1990Discover Date: EVEREST ELECTRONIC (Continued) 1001615095 Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 90UT090LOC Case Number: 083001474TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/09/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.916936Longitude: 33.7960783Latitude: T0605901120Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1077 ft. Site 4 of 10 in cluster G 0.204 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE 2100 ORANGEWOOD N/A G45 LUSTEVEREST ELECTRONIC S104573813 TC4340409.2s Page 74 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 04/05/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901120Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 04/05/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901120Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/09/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901120Global Id: 04/05/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901120Global Id: Status History: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901120Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901120Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: EVEREST ELECTRONIC (Continued) S104573813 Not reportedContact address: PAULA S MOSESContact: CAD008335184EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2100 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE.Facility address: APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEMSFacility name: 02/21/2006Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1077 ft. Site 5 of 10 in cluster G 0.204 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE EMI2100 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE.CAD008335184 G46 RCRA-LQGAPW ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS 1007198720 TC4340409.2s Page 75 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/01/1977Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: R. WELLS FAMILY PARTNERSHIP AND TRUSTOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 09/01/1996Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEMSOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: PAULA.MOSES@APW.COMContact email: (714) 634-7312Contact telephone: USContact country: Not reported APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS (Continued) 1007198720 TC4340409.2s Page 76 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEMSSite name: 02/02/2004Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 214. Waste name: 214. Waste code: APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS (Continued) 1007198720 TC4340409.2s Page 77 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 18Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 19Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: BConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: YCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3479SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 110175Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2001Year: EMI: No violations foundViolation Status: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: F005. Waste code: METHYL ETHYL KETONE. Waste name: D035. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: APWSite name: 02/19/2002Date form received by agency: THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES. LISTED IN F001, F002, OR F004; AND STILL BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS OR THOSE SOLVENTS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF 2-ETHOXYETHANOL, AND 2-NITROPROPANE; ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS KETONE, CARBON DISULFIDE, ISOBUTANOL, PYRIDINE, BENZENE, THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: TOLUENE, METHYL ETHYL. Waste name: APW ENCLOSURE SYSTEMS (Continued) 1007198720 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: NPDES: 1077 ft. Site 6 of 10 in cluster G 0.204 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 EMIANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE HIST UST2100 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A G47 NPDESAMF ANAHEIM LLC U001578848 TC4340409.2s Page 78 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: ahill@accuratemetal.netOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-363-9206OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Anthony HillOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92806OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: AnaheimOPERATOR CITY: 2100 E Orangewood AveOPERATOR ADDRESS: Accurate Metal Fabricators Anaheim LLCOPERATOR NAME: ahill@accuratemetal.netFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-363-9203FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Anthony HillFACILITY CONTACT NAME: SqFtPLACE SIZE UNIT: 114456PLACE SIZE: 07/25/2012STATUS DATE: TerminatedSTATUS CODE NAME: 12/28/2006PROCESSED DATE: 05/09/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: 06/22/2012Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I020611WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 317608Regulatory Measure Id: AMF ANAHEIM LLC (Continued)U001578848 TC4340409.2s Page 79 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92806Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: AnaheimDischarge City: 2100 E Orangewood AveDischarge Address: Accurate Metal Fabricators Anaheim LLCDischarge Name: 06/22/2012Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 12/28/2006Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I020611WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 317608Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: TerminatedFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 3444-Sheet Metal WorkPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Santa Ana RiverRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: AMF ANAHEIM LLC (Continued)U001578848 TC4340409.2s Page 80 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 02Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: /4 2Container Construction Thickness: 1Type of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1980Year Installed: 01Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92806Owner City,St,Zip: 2100 E. ORANGEWOOD AVENUEOwner Address: EVEREST ELECTRONIC EQUIPMENT,Owner Name: 7146342200Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: MFG.Other Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000067588Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: AMF ANAHEIM LLC (Continued)U001578848 TC4340409.2s Page 81 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 110175Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2004Year: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 15Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 15Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 110175Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2003Year: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 15Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 15Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 110175Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2002Year: EMI: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1981Year Installed: 03Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock InventorLeak Detection: 10Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: AMF ANAHEIM LLC (Continued)U001578848 TC4340409.2s Page 82 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation .01Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 16.164Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 18.46229976641215077Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3469SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 149235Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2007Year: 1.349048Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1.41Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .037NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .01Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 16.164Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 18.46229976641215077Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3469SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 149235Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2006Year: 1.1124016Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1.156985Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .00337SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .675NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .287Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 18.331968353Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 18.7589Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 110175Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2005Year: 0.52Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.72433Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00281SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.44NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.118Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 14.74Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 15.338Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: YCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: AMF ANAHEIM LLC (Continued)U001578848 TC4340409.2s Page 83 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2011Year: 2.4467766599999998Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 2.5518887499999998Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 7.0299999999999998E-3SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.52749NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.41121000000000002Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 20.057120000000001Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 47.8609772661042Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 149235Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2010Year: 0.94163607999999999Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0.98813099999999998Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 3.8730000000000001E-3SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0.79000000000000004NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.20000000000000001Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 12.939799000000001Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 30.578580951656601Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 149235Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2009Year: 1.1841663622954Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1.241642291974375Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: .0003468SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .069865NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: .02023Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 14.11891100006167Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 33.08679033919290065Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 149235Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 2008Year: 1.349048Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1.41Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: .037NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: AMF ANAHEIM LLC (Continued)U001578848 TC4340409.2s Page 84 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 2.9164782Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 3.03661Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0.00732SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1.59855NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0.43032Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 18.12627Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 18.300827549Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 3444SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 149235Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: AMF ANAHEIM LLC (Continued)U001578848 Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: AHILL@ACCURATEMETAL.NETContact email: 1181Telephone ext.: 714-363-9206Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AVENUEContact address: ANTHONY E HILLContact: CAR000179572EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AVENUEFacility address: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLCFacility name: 04/19/2013Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1077 ft. Site 7 of 10 in cluster G 0.204 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 SE 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AVENUE CAR000179572 G48 RCRA-LQGACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLC 1010313908 TC4340409.2s Page 85 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation D005. Waste code: REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name: D003. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 461. Waste name: 461. Waste code: 352. Waste name: 352. Waste code: 331. Waste name: 331. Waste code: 213. Waste name: 213. Waste code: 212. Waste name: 212. Waste code: 181. Waste name: 181. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 04/23/2012Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: 714-363-9206Owner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2100 E ORANGEWOOD AVENUEOwner/operator address: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 04/23/2012Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLC (Continued) 1010313908 TC4340409.2s Page 86 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation BARIUM. Waste name: D005. Waste code: REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name: D003. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 461. Waste name: 461. Waste code: 352. Waste name: 352. Waste code: 331. Waste name: 331. Waste code: 213. Waste name: 213. Waste code: 212. Waste name: 212. Waste code: 181. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLCSite name: 07/23/2012Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: BARIUM. Waste name: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLC (Continued) 1010313908 TC4340409.2s Page 87 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation REACTIVE WASTE. Waste name: D003. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: 461. Waste name: 461. Waste code: 352. Waste name: 352. Waste code: 331. Waste name: 331. Waste code: 223. Waste name: 223. Waste code: 213. Waste name: 213. Waste code: 212. Waste name: 212. Waste code: 181. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: AMF ANAHEIM, LLCSite name: 03/16/2012Date form received by agency: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLC (Continued) 1010313908 TC4340409.2s Page 88 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation F003. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: ACCURATE METAL FABRICATORS, ANAHEIM LLCSite name: 02/21/2008Date form received by agency: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: AMF ACCURATE METAL FABRICATIORSSite name: 05/11/2010Date form received by agency: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: F003. Waste code: SILVER. Waste name: D011. Waste code: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: LEAD. Waste name: D008. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLC (Continued) 1010313908 TC4340409.2s Page 89 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 18625Amount (Lbs): MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005, AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND, A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NON-HALOGENATED NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NON-HALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYLWaste name: F003Waste code: 9600Amount (Lbs): LEADWaste name: D008Waste code: 28316.1Amount (Lbs): WHICH WOULD BE CONSIDERED AS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTE. MATERIAL. LACQUER THINNER IS AN EXAMPLE OF A COMMONLY USED SOLVENT WHICH CAN BE OBTAINED FROM THE MANUFACTURER OR DISTRIBUTOR OF THE FLASH POINT OF A WASTE IS TO REVIEW THE MATERIAL SAFETY DATA SHEET, CLOSED CUP FLASH POINT TESTER. ANOTHER METHOD OF DETERMINING THE LESS THAN 140 DEGREES FAHRENHEIT AS DETERMINED BY A PENSKY-MARTENS IGNITABLE HAZARDOUS WASTES ARE THOSE WASTES WHICH HAVE A FLASHPOINT OFWaste name: D001Waste code: Annual Waste Handled: Last Biennial Reporting Year: 2013 Biennial Reports: MERCURY. Waste name: D009. Waste code: CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: AMF ANAHEIM LLCSite name: 11/13/2006Date form received by agency: MIXTURES. BOTTOMS FROM THE RECOVERY OF THESE SPENT SOLVENTS AND SPENT SOLVENT MORE OF THOSE SOLVENTS LISTED IN F001, F002, F004, AND F005; AND STILL SOLVENTS, AND A TOTAL OF TEN PERCENT OR MORE (BY VOLUME) OF ONE OR CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONE OR MORE OF THE ABOVE NONHALOGENATED NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS; AND ALL SPENT SOLVENT MIXTURES/BLENDS MIXTURES/BLENDS CONTAINING, BEFORE USE, ONLY THE ABOVE SPENT ALCOHOL, CYCLOHEXANONE, AND METHANOL; ALL SPENT SOLVENT ACETATE, ETHYL BENZENE, ETHYL ETHER, METHYL ISOBUTYL KETONE, N-BUTYL THE FOLLOWING SPENT NONHALOGENATED SOLVENTS: XYLENE, ACETONE, ETHYL. Waste name: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLC (Continued) 1010313908 TC4340409.2s Page 90 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation StateEvaluation lead agency: Not reportedDate achieved compliance: Not reportedArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 04/28/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 05/12/2011Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 03/28/2011Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 05/12/2011Date achieved compliance: 03/28/2011Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: ACCURATE METAL SOLUTIONS ANAHEIM LLC (Continued) 1010313908 Stock InventorLeak Detection: XContainer Construction Thickness: 4Type of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: P-D-IContainer Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92801Owner City,St,Zip: 305 WEST ROMNEYA DRIVEOwner Address: ALEX FOODS, INC.Owner Name: 7146348441Telephone: MICHAEL MORALESContact Name: FOOD MANUFACTUREROther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000066955Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1095 ft. Site 8 of 10 in cluster G 0.207 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ESE 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AVE N/A G49 HIST USTPINATA FOODS, INC.U001578871 TC4340409.2s Page 91 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 04/18/1998Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605902165Global Id: 02/23/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605902165Global Id: Status History: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902165Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605902165Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003184TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 02/23/2000Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.886025Longitude: 33.797136Latitude: T0605902165Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 083003184TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1095 ft.EMISite 9 of 10 in cluster G 0.207 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 CA FID USTANAHEIM, CA 91806 ESE LUST2125 E ORANGEWOOD AV N/A G50 HIST CORTESEPINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX S101619875 TC4340409.2s Page 92 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 4/28/1998Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 6/29/1998Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605902165Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: STATE COLLEGECross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: HydrocarbonsSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003184TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Leak ReportedAction: 05/05/1998Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 04/18/1998Date: OtherAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/23/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/23/2000Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605902165Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 04/28/1998Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605902165Global Id: 09/09/1999Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605902165Global Id: 07/17/1998Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605902165Global Id: PINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX (Continued) S101619875 TC4340409.2s Page 93 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92806Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 305 W ROMNEYAMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146348441Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30006755Facility ID: CA FID UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8866009Longitude: 33.7962663Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 6/29/1998Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 9/9/1999Date Remedial Action Underway: 7/17/1998Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/23/2000Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 4/18/1998Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: PINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX (Continued)S101619875 TC4340409.2s Page 94 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2051SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 39711Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: 1Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 2Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 1NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 2051SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 39711Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: 1Number Of Tanks: DIESELContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 10-15-93Active Date: 15000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-000046-000004SWRCB Tank Id: UNKNOWNOwner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 05-16-94Action Date: 10-15-93Referral Date: 44-035510Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 46Comp Number: ActiveStatus: PINATA MEXICAN FOODS,DIV ALEX (Continued) S101619875 TC4340409.2s Page 95 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/02/2006Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: USOwner/operator country: ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 25 ENTERPRISE OC LANDOwner/operator address: PLATINUM TRIANGLE PARTNERS LLCOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/02/2006Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: PLATINUM TRIANGLE PARTNERS LLCOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: RON.BALLOU@LENNAR.COMContact email: 714-478-5593Contact telephone: USContact country: ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 25 ENTERPRISE OC LANDContact address: RON BALLOUContact: ALISO VIEJO, CA 92656 OC LAND 25 ENTERPRISEMailing address: CAR000183194EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2125 E ORANGEWOOD AVEFacility address: PLATINUM TRIANGLE PARTNERS LLCFacility name: 04/05/2007Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 1095 ft. Site 10 of 10 in cluster G 0.207 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 ESE HAZNET2125 E ORANGEWOOD AVE CAR000183194 G51 RCRA-LQGPLATINUM TRIANGLE PARTNERS LLC 1010314188 TC4340409.2s Page 96 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CAR000183194GEPAID: 2007Year: 1010314188envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.09Tons: Other TreatmentDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD982444481TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ALISO VIEJO, CA 926560000Mailing City,St,Zip: 25 ENTERPRISE OC LANDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7144785593Telephone: RON BALLOUContact: CAR000183194GEPAID: 2007Year: 1010314188envid: OrangeFacility County: 0.01Tons: (H010-H129) Or (H131-H135) Storage, Bulking, And/Or Transfer Off Site--No Treatment/ReoveryDisposal Method: Other empty containers 30 gallons or moreWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008252405TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ALISO VIEJO, CA 926560000Mailing City,St,Zip: 25 ENTERPRISE OC LANDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7144785593Telephone: RON BALLOUContact: CAR000183194GEPAID: 2007Year: 1010314188envid: HAZNET: No violations foundViolation Status: IGNITABLE WASTE. Waste name: D001. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: PLATINUM TRIANGLE PARTNERS LLC (Continued)1010314188 TC4340409.2s Page 97 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: 0.24Tons: Fuel Blending Prior To Energy Recovery At Another SiteDisposal Method: Off-specification, aged or surplus organicsWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAD008252405TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ALISO VIEJO, CA 926560000Mailing City,St,Zip: 25 ENTERPRISE OC LANDMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 7144785593Telephone: RON BALLOUContact: PLATINUM TRIANGLE PARTNERS LLC (Continued) 1010314188 Stock InventorLeak Detection: Not reportedContainer Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: Not reportedYear Installed: 1Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92805Owner City,St,Zip: 200 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD, SOwner Address: CITY OF ANAHEIM - DEPARTMENT OOwner Name: 7149995140Telephone: BOB BLYTHEContact Name: STADIUMOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000056182Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1174 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster H 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 East 2000 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE BOULE N/A H52 HIST USTANAHEIM STADIUM U001578726 30-011-006280-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-016128Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 6280Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: 1174 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster H 0.222 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 East 2000 S GENE AUTRY WAY N/A H53 SWEEPS USTANAHEIM STADIUM S106922662 TC4340409.2s Page 98 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 1000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: ANAHEIM STADIUM (Continued)S106922662 1,475Total Gallons: ANGEL STADIUM OF ANAHEIMOwner: AnaheimCertified Unified Program Agencies: AST: 1202 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster H 0.228 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 150 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA East 2000 E GENE AUTRY WAY N/A H54 AST A100336833 WASTE (OR SLOP) OILReleased Chemical: Closed pre 1994, file review required to determine closure typeClosure Type: CLOSED 3/19/1992Current Status: RO0000414Record ID: ORANGERegion: 92IC007Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: -117.89783Longitude: 33.80031Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 9932Facility ID: UST: 1214 ft. 0.230 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 143 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 West Orange Co. Industrial Site1928 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/A 55 USTKEESE TANK CO U003879591 17315 STUDEBAKER ROADMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7149789744Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30016099Facility ID: CA FID UST: 1316 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster I 0.249 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE SWEEPS UST1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A I56 CA FID USTARCO FACILITY #6220 S101589498 TC4340409.2s Page 99 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedActive Date: 8000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004775-000003SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4775Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004775-000002SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4775Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: 3Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: Not reportedActive Date: 10000Capacity: Not reportedTank Status: 30-011-004775-000001SWRCB Tank Id: Not reportedOwner Tank Id: Not reportedCreated Date: Not reportedAction Date: Not reportedReferral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: Not reportedNumber: 4775Comp Number: Not reportedStatus: SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92805Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: ARCO FACILITY #6220 (Continued)S101589498 TC4340409.2s Page 100 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 1000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004775-000006SWRCB Tank Id: TANK#3Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 06-23-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4775Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004775-000005SWRCB Tank Id: TANK#2Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 06-23-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4775Comp Number: ActiveStatus: 4Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004775-000004SWRCB Tank Id: TANK#1Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 06-23-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4775Comp Number: ActiveStatus: Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PRODUCTSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: ARCO FACILITY #6220 (Continued)S101589498 TC4340409.2s Page 101 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedNumber Of Tanks: PRM UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 04-15-93Active Date: 10000Capacity: ATank Status: 30-011-004775-000007SWRCB Tank Id: TANK#4Owner Tank Id: 12-31-88Created Date: 06-23-94Action Date: 04-15-93Referral Date: 44-000506Board Of Equalization: 1Number: 4775Comp Number: ARCO FACILITY #6220 (Continued)S101589498 Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 10/19/1994Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/28/1993Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 10/4/1993Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 12/22/1993Enter Date: 9/28/1993How Stopped Date: T0605900941Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: KATELLACross Street: spreading or land farming) Excavate and Treat - remove contaminated soil and treat (includesAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: Unleaded GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001205TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083001205TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1316 ft. Site 2 of 5 in cluster I 0.249 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE LUST1801 STATE COLLEGE N/A I57 HIST CORTESEARCO #6220 S102424429 TC4340409.2s Page 102 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: VJJStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8893416Longitude: 33.80320623Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 12/22/1993Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: ARCO #6220 (Continued)S102424429 -117.8888853Longitude: 33.8042239Latitude: ANAHEIM CITY LOPPermitting Agency: 9524Facility ID: UST: 1316 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster I 0.249 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NNE 1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A I58 USTARCO FACILITY #05999 U003940404 10/19/1994Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8893416Longitude: 33.803206233Latitude: T0605900941Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1316 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster I 0.249 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE 1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A I59 LUSTARCO #6220 S103637044 TC4340409.2s Page 103 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900941Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/28/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900941Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 10/09/1994Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900941Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/04/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900941Global Id: 09/28/1993Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900941Global Id: 10/19/1994Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900941Global Id: Status History: 9517824903Phone Number: vjahn-bull@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: VALERIE JAHN-BULLContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900941Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900941Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083001205TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: ARCO #6220 (Continued)S103637044 TC4340409.2s Page 104 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 09/29/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900941Global Id: File reviewAction: 10/17/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900941Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 09/28/1993Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900941Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 10/19/1994Date: ARCO #6220 (Continued)S103637044 1973Year Installed: 0000000003Container Num: 003Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 0000240Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 0000000002Container Num: 002Tank Num: Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 0000240Container Construction Thickness: REGULARType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1973Year Installed: 0000000001Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0003Total Tanks: LOS ANGELES, CA 90071Owner City,St,Zip: 515 SOUTH FLOWER STREETOwner Address: ARCO PETROLEUM PRODUCTS CO.Owner Name: 0000000000Telephone: Not reportedContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: Gas StationFacility Type: 00000026892Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: 1316 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster I 0.249 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NNE 1801 S STATE COLLEGE BLVD N/A I60 HIST USTCHUAN CHUN LU U001578841 TC4340409.2s Page 105 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Stock Inventor, 10Leak Detection: 0000240Container Construction Thickness: PREMIUMType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: CHUAN CHUN LU (Continued)U001578841 NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (714) 521-4500Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: LA MIRADA, CA 90638 16751 KNOTT AVEOwner/operator address: WESTRUX INTLOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (310) 404-1020Contact telephone: USContact country: SANTA FE SPRINGS, CA 90670 15555 VALLEY VIEW AVEContact address: MG MOWREYContact: CAD983639527EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1110 E KATELLAFacility address: WESTRUX INTLFacility name: 11/30/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: HAZNET 1492 ft.CA FID USTSite 1 of 2 in cluster J 0.283 mi.LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 148 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW FINDS1110 E KATELLA CAD983639527 J61 RCRA NonGen / NLRWESTRUX INTL 1000818227 TC4340409.2s Page 106 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 11/12/1996Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 11/25/1996Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 4/25/1997Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 10/29/1996Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 10/29/1996Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 11/12/1996Enter Date: 10/29/1996How Stopped Date: T0605901993Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002915TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083002915TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002878529Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: WESTRUX INTL (Continued)1000818227 TC4340409.2s Page 107 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation .2220Tons: Transfer StationDisposal Method: Oxygenated solvents (acetone, butanol, ethyl acetate, etc.)Waste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT000613976TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1110 E KATELLA AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: WESTRUX INTLContact: CAD983639527GEPAID: 1996Year: 1000818227envid: HAZNET: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92805Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1110 E KATELLAMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146343474Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30008576Facility ID: CA FID UST: WASTE OIL ALSO.Summary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: NOMStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8950763Longitude: 33.8032331Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: WESTRUX INTL (Continued)1000818227 TC4340409.2s Page 108 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OrangeFacility County: 1.6680Tons: RecyclerDisposal Method: Waste oil and mixed oilWaste Category: Not reportedTSD County: CAT080013352TSD EPA ID: Not reportedGen County: ANAHEIM, CA 928050000Mailing City,St,Zip: 1110 E KATELLA AVEMailing Address: Not reportedMailing Name: 0000000000Telephone: WESTRUX INTLContact: CAD983639527GEPAID: 1996Year: 1000818227envid: OrangeFacility County: WESTRUX INTL (Continued)1000818227 SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901993Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901993Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002915TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 08/17/2007Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8958743Longitude: 33.8032513Latitude: T0605901993Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1492 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster J 0.283 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 148 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW 1110 E KATELLA AVE N/A J62 LUSTWESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS 1000228473 TC4340409.2s Page 109 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Open - Reopen CaseStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 09/29/2006Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 03/02/2006Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 02/16/2006Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 11/25/1996Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 10/29/1996Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 08/17/2007Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 05/21/2007Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 03/01/2007Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 01/18/2007Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 04/25/1997Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901993Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901993Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS (Continued) 1000228473 TC4340409.2s Page 110 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 10/30/1996Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 04/25/1997Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 10/29/1996Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 08/17/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 08/16/2007Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: ExcavationAction: 08/25/1996Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: Unauthorized Release FormAction: 11/18/1996Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/29/1996Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: * No ActionAction: 11/13/1996Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901993Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/29/1996Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901993Global Id: 12/20/2005Status Date: WESTRUX INTERNATIONAL TRUCKS (Continued) 1000228473 TC4340409.2s Page 111 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Signed agreement sent (FedEx) to District.Comments: 06/10/2009Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001110Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404830Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 375-381-35Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 375-381-34Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-751-15Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-751-14Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-751-01Alias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: (PCBs, Trichloroethylene (TCE Tetrachloroethylene (PCE, Naphthalene, Polychlorinated biphenylsConfirmed COC: Trichloroethylene (TCE, Naphthalene Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE,Potential COC: STORAGE TANKS, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION - WAREHOUSING ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, AGRICULTURAL - ORCHARD, UNDERGROUNDPast Use: 083-751-01, 083-751-14, 083-751-15, 375-381-34, 375-381-35APN: -117.8966Longitude: 33.8033Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 10/12/2011Status Date: Inactive - Action RequiredStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 34Senate: 69Assembly: 404830Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Christine ChiuProject Manager: DTSC - Site Cleanup ProgramLead Agency Description: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 3.76Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 60001110Facility ID: SCH: 1651 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster K 0.313 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 147 ft. 1/4-1/2 ENVIROSTORANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW LUST1016 EAST KATELLA AVENUE N/A K63 SCHPLATINUM TRIANGLE S109548352 TC4340409.2s Page 112 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Recovery Unit Memorandum. On 10/23/2009, DTSC prepared & transmitted the project close out CostComments: 10/23/2009Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ready. however, that a summary data report will be submitted to DTSC when the Agreement effective immediately. The letter also indicates, August 12, 2009, with notification that the District is terminating On August 17, 2009, DTSC received a letter from the District, datedComments: 08/17/2009Completed Date: Agreement Terminated NotificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: to risk and hazard. 10-5 and the total hazard index as 17. PCE is the primary contributor due to chlorinated compounds via the vapor intrusion pathway as 1.5 x of PCE; 20 ug/l of TCE. The risk evaluation estimated the cancer risk in soil gas include the following: 0.15 ug/l of naphthalene; 580 ug/l results from fieldwork conducted in July 2009. Maximum concentrations Report. The report summarized the soil and soil vapor sampling the District terminated the EOA (August 2009) prior to receipt of the DTSC did not review the Environmental Assessment Summary Report sinceComments: 10/22/2009Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: line of sight of the proposed school property. and 1016 E. Katella properties and delivered to properties within the Work Notice and was informed that the Notice was posted at the 1010 Via email on July 7, 2009, DTSC received a final copy of the FieldComments: 07/07/2009Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: On July 10, 2009, fieldwork was completed per District’s consultant.Comments: 07/10/2009Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: and provided comments on the site sampling plan. appeared consistent with discussions with the District’s consultant Via email on 07/03/2009, DTSC noted that the site sampling planComments: 07/03/2009Completed Date: Technical WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: PLATINUM TRIANGLE (Continued)S109548352 TC4340409.2s Page 113 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Regulatory Activities: 02/27/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900867Global Id: 10/24/1988Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900867Global Id: Status History: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900867Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900867Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / Lubricating, Tetrachloroethylene (PCE)Potential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 88UT183LOC Case Number: 083001097TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 02/27/1990Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.896483Longitude: 33.801872Latitude: T0605900867Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: PLATINUM TRIANGLE (Continued)S109548352 TC4340409.2s Page 114 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 60001110Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404830Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 375-381-35Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 375-381-34Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-751-15Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-751-14Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-751-01Alias Name: SOIL, SVPotential Description: Trichloroethylene (TCE Tetrachloroethylene (PCE Naphthalene Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsConfirmed COC: Trichloroethylene (TCE Naphthalene Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs Tetrachloroethylene (PCEPotential COC: STORAGE TANKS, VEHICLE MAINTENANCE, TRANSPORTATION - WAREHOUSING ABOVE GROUND STORAGE TANKS, AGRICULTURAL - ORCHARD, UNDERGROUNDPast Use: 083-751-01, 083-751-14, 083-751-15, 375-381-34, 375-381-35APN: -117.8966Longitude: 33.8033Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Christine ChiuProgram Manager: SMBRPLead Agency: SMBRPRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 3.76Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404830Site Code: 10/12/2011Status Date: Inactive - Action RequiredStatus: 60001110Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: Leak ReportedAction: 10/24/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900867Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 10/24/1988Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900867Global Id: PLATINUM TRIANGLE (Continued)S109548352 TC4340409.2s Page 115 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 10/23/2009Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ready. however, that a summary data report will be submitted to DTSC when the Agreement effective immediately. The letter also indicates, August 12, 2009, with notification that the District is terminating On August 17, 2009, DTSC received a letter from the District, datedComments: 08/17/2009Completed Date: Agreement Terminated NotificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: to risk and hazard. 10-5 and the total hazard index as 17. PCE is the primary contributor due to chlorinated compounds via the vapor intrusion pathway as 1.5 x of PCE; 20 ug/l of TCE. The risk evaluation estimated the cancer risk in soil gas include the following: 0.15 ug/l of naphthalene; 580 ug/l results from fieldwork conducted in July 2009. Maximum concentrations Report. The report summarized the soil and soil vapor sampling the District terminated the EOA (August 2009) prior to receipt of the DTSC did not review the Environmental Assessment Summary Report sinceComments: 10/22/2009Completed Date: Technical ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: line of sight of the proposed school property. and 1016 E. Katella properties and delivered to properties within the Work Notice and was informed that the Notice was posted at the 1010 Via email on July 7, 2009, DTSC received a final copy of the FieldComments: 07/07/2009Completed Date: Public NoticeCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: On July 10, 2009, fieldwork was completed per District’s consultant.Comments: 07/10/2009Completed Date: FieldworkCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: and provided comments on the site sampling plan. appeared consistent with discussions with the District’s consultant Via email on 07/03/2009, DTSC noted that the site sampling planComments: 07/03/2009Completed Date: Technical WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Signed agreement sent (FedEx) to District.Comments: 06/10/2009Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: PLATINUM TRIANGLE (Continued)S109548352 TC4340409.2s Page 116 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Recovery Unit Memorandum. On 10/23/2009, DTSC prepared & transmitted the project close out CostComments: PLATINUM TRIANGLE (Continued)S109548352 Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: W JAYCOX TRUSTOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 634-4551Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1016 E KATELLA AVEContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 E KATELLA AVEMailing address: CAD981981020EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1016 E KATELLA AVEFacility address: JAYCOX DISPOSALFacility name: 04/06/1987Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: EMI 1651 ft.HIST USTSite 2 of 4 in cluster K 0.313 mi.LUST Relative: Higher Actual: 147 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW FINDS1016 E KATELLA AVE CAD981981020 K64 RCRA-SQGJAYCOX DISPOSAL 1000180676 TC4340409.2s Page 117 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: 12035,127184Substance: Soil onlyCase Type: 88UT183Local Case Num: 083001097TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083001097TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002763625Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)1000180676 TC4340409.2s Page 118 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0010Total Tanks: ANAHEIM, CA 92805Owner City,St,Zip: 1016 E. KATELLA AVENUEOwner Address: JAYCOX DISPOSAL COMPANY, INC.Owner Name: 7146344551Telephone: ROBERT GUERRAContact Name: REFUSE COLLECTIONOther Type: OtherFacility Type: 00000003388Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8958413Longitude: 33.8032411Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/27/1990Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 10/24/1988Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900867Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)1000180676 TC4340409.2s Page 119 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1975Year Installed: Not reportedContainer Num: 007Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 3/16Container Construction Thickness: UNLEADEDType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: G #4Container Num: 006Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: E #7Container Num: 005Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: A.T. #8Container Num: 004Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: A.T. #8Container Num: 003Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00002000Tank Capacity: 1975Year Installed: H #9Container Num: 002Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 12Container Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000280Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: W #6Container Num: 001Tank Num: JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)1000180676 TC4340409.2s Page 120 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 0Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 0Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 5199SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 38566Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1987Year: EMI: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00010000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: D #1Container Num: 010Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 60012000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: D #2Container Num: 009Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: DIESELType of Fuel: PRODUCTTank Used for: 00008000Tank Capacity: 1969Year Installed: D #3Container Num: 008Tank Num: Pressure TestLeak Detection: 1/4Container Construction Thickness: WASTE OILType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00001000Tank Capacity: JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)1000180676 TC4340409.2s Page 121 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: KSCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.8967556Longitude: 33.8028819Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: T10000004434Global Id: 11/13/2012Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 1685 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster K 0.319 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 147 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW 1000 EAST KATELLA AVENUE N/A K65 SLICBROWNCO CONSTRUCTION COMPANY S112274197 Not reportedPriority Level: 12/01/87Date Completed: / /Date Started: DISCOVERYAction: CERCLIS-NFRAP Assessment History: CA Not reportedAlias Address: ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATINGAlias Name: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Alias Name(s): 13004003.00000Person ID: 13297775.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003858.00000Person ID: 13291917.00000Contact Sequence ID: 13003854.00000Person ID: 13286322.00000Contact Sequence ID: CERCLIS-NFRAP Site Contact Details: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationNon NPL Status: Not on the NPLNPL Status: Not a Federal FacilityFederal Facility: 0900449Site ID: CERC-NFRAP: 1685 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster K 0.319 mi.ENVIROSTOR Relative: Higher Actual: 147 ft. 1/4-1/2 FINDSANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW RCRA-SQG1000 E KATELLA ST CAD049903271 K66 CERC-NFRAPORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING 1000315096 TC4340409.2s Page 122 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: DOWNEY HEAT TREATING COMPANYOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: hazardous waste at any time waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1000 kg of hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less of hazardous waste during any calendar month and accumulates less than 6000 kg of Handler: generates more than 100 and less than 1000 kg of hazardousDescription: Small Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: Not reportedContact telephone: USContact country: Not reported Not reportedContact address: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 E KATELLA STMailing address: CAD049903271EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1000 E KATELLA STFacility address: ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATINGFacility name: 09/01/1996Date form received by agency: RCRA-SQG: NFRAP-Site does not qualify for the NPL based on existing informationPriority Level: 11/14/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: PRELIMINARY ASSESSMENTAction: Not reportedPriority Level: 11/14/88Date Completed: / /Date Started: ARCHIVE SITEAction: ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING (Continued) 1000315096 TC4340409.2s Page 123 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LEONARDO MARBLEAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: * UNSPECIFIED AQUEOUS SOLUTIONPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8966Longitude: 33.80269Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 04/20/1988Status Date: Refer: Other AgencyStatus: 30330009Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource Environmental Interest/Information System 110002647734Registry ID: FINDS: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING (Continued) 1000315096 TC4340409.2s Page 124 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED PHONE BOOK SEARCH (1971)Comments: 09/01/1981Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDEDComments: 05/21/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: PROBLEM PRELIM ASSESS DONE HISTORICAL RECORDS DO NOT INDICATE FAC WAS AComments: 04/20/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DATABASE VALIDATION PROGRAM CONFIRMS NFA FOR DTSC.Comments: 10/28/1994Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30330009Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002647734Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD049903271Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING (Continued) 1000315096 10/09/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.897519Longitude: 33.802991Latitude: T0605901266Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1726 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster L 0.327 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 146 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW HIST UST1818 S LEWIS ST N/A L67 LUSTSTATION #8800 U001578791 TC4340409.2s Page 125 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 09/19/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901266Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 10/09/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901266Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 10/03/1990Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901266Global Id: 09/19/1990Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901266Global Id: 10/09/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901266Global Id: 09/19/1990Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901266Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901266Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901266Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 90UT209LOC Case Number: 083001680TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: STATION #8800 (Continued)U001578791 TC4340409.2s Page 126 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation T0605983677Global Id: 04/13/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605983677Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605983677Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605983677Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083004021TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 03/09/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.897475Longitude: 33.802988Latitude: T0605983677Global Id: STATERegion: Leak ReportedAction: 10/03/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901266Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 09/19/1990Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901266Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: STATION #8800 (Continued)U001578791 TC4340409.2s Page 127 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Gas StationFacility Type: 00000040808Facility ID: STATERegion: HIST UST: Letter - NoticeAction: 04/14/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605983677Global Id: Letter - NoticeAction: 06/18/2009Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605983677Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 04/13/2005Date: OtherAction Type: T0605983677Global Id: Not reportedAction: 12/30/2004Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605983677Global Id: ExcavationAction: 12/30/2004Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605983677Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 03/09/2011Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605983677Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/30/2004Date: OtherAction Type: T0605983677Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/30/2004Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605983677Global Id: 03/09/2011Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605983677Global Id: 03/27/2009Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605983677Global Id: 03/27/2009Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: STATION #8800 (Continued)U001578791 TC4340409.2s Page 128 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation VisualLeak Detection: 6Container Construction Thickness: Not reportedType of Fuel: WASTETank Used for: 00000000Tank Capacity: 1964Year Installed: 8800-00Container Num: 001Tank Num: 0001Total Tanks: SAN DIEGO, CA 92108Owner City,St,Zip: 1450 FRAZEE ROADOwner Address: UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIOwner Name: 7146342060Telephone: JOSEPH NEILLContact Name: Not reportedOther Type: STATION #8800 (Continued)U001578791 Not reportedPhone Number: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T060590323Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003827TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 01/16/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.897516Longitude: 33.802991Latitude: T060590323Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 083001680TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1726 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster L 0.327 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 146 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW LUST1818 LEWIS N/A L68 HIST CORTESEUNOCAL #8800 S103943474 TC4340409.2s Page 129 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation File reviewAction: 08/14/2013Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T060590323Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 04/01/2001Date: OtherAction Type: T060590323Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 01/16/2002Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T060590323Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 05/01/2001Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T060590323Global Id: 05/17/2001Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T060590323Global Id: 05/01/2001Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T060590323Global Id: 01/16/2002Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T060590323Global Id: Status History: UNOCAL #8800 (Continued)S103943474 UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: None TakenEnf Type: KATELLACross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT209Local Case Num: 083001680TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1726 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster L 0.327 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 146 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW 1818 LEWIS ST N/A L69 LUSTTOSCO - 76 STATION #8800 S105693568 TC4340409.2s Page 130 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: NOMStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8977484Longitude: 33.8029081Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 12/15/1990Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 10/9/1995Close Date: 1/1/1965Enforcement Date: 9/19/1990Discover Date: 10/3/1990Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 9/19/1990Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 12/15/1990Enter Date: 9/19/1990How Stopped Date: T0605901266Global ID: UNKLeak Source: TOSCO - 76 STATION #8800 (Continued) S105693568 Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003827TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1726 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster L 0.327 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 146 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA NW 1818 SOUTH LEWIS STREET N/A L70 LUSTTOSCO/76 SS #8800 S101299297 TC4340409.2s Page 131 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Haz Mat incident report filed : LEAKING DISPENSER REPAIRED : BAD SEALSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: Not reportedLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: NOMStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: 5/17/2001Date Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 1/16/2002Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: 5/1/2001Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T060590323Global ID: DLeak Source: Other CauseLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: FIHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: TOSCO/76 SS #8800 (Continued)S101299297 -117.8930216Longitude: 33.795324Latitude: T0605900520Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1788 ft. Site 1 of 5 in cluster M 0.339 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 143 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92668 South 531 ANAHEIM BLVD N/A M71 LUSTC. O. THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO.S104566063 TC4340409.2s Page 132 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 05/18/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900520Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/08/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900520Global Id: 11/14/1996Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605900520Global Id: 05/18/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900520Global Id: 03/18/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900520Global Id: Status History: 9513202007Phone Number: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEMContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900520Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Aquifer used for drinking water supplyPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083000652TRB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: TMECase Worker: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: 03/18/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: C. O. THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO. (Continued) S104566063 TC4340409.2s Page 133 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: Not reportedLocal Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: Not reportedStaff Initials: TMEStaff: Not reportedMTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: 10Max MTBE Soil: 2MTBE Concentration: 5Max MTBE GW: 4/14/1997MTBE Date: -117.892511Longitude: 33.7943693Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: <GW Qualifies: 10/13/1987Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: 11/14/1996Date Remediation Plan Submitted: 8/8/1991Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 3/18/1998Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 10/13/1987Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605900520Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: State FundsFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: WESTERNCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Aquifer affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000652TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 1788 ft.Site 2 of 5 in cluster M 0.339 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 143 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92668 South 531 ANAHEIM BLVD N/A M72 LUSTC. O. THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO.S103463979 TC4340409.2s Page 134 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation RP IN BANKRUPTCY. CALTRANS WORKING ON SITE INV. AND CLEANUP.Summary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: C. O. THOMPSON PETROLEUM CO. (Continued) S103463979 Status History: 7144336262Phone Number: ssundaram@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: SHYAMALA KALYANASUNDARAMContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901816Global Id: 9513202007Phone Number: tmbeke-ekanem@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: TOM E. MBEKE-EKANEMContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901816Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: 88UT006LOC Case Number: 083002596TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: TMECase Worker: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: 03/18/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8927306Longitude: 33.7950461Latitude: T0605901816Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 083000767TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1808 ft. Site 3 of 5 in cluster M 0.342 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 143 ft. 1/4-1/2 ORANGE, CA 92668 South LUST505 ANAHEIM BLVD N/A M73 HIST CORTESECALTRANS/C.O. THOMPSON S103695941 TC4340409.2s Page 135 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 09/23/1996Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901816Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 09/20/1996Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901816Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/20/1996Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901816Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 09/20/1996Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901816Global Id: 11/14/1996Status Date: Open - RemediationStatus: T0605901816Global Id: 09/20/1996Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901816Global Id: 03/18/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901816Global Id: CALTRANS/C.O. THOMPSON (Continued) S103695941 CHAPAMNCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: Waste OilSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 88UT006Local Case Num: 083002596TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083002596TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1808 ft. Site 4 of 5 in cluster M 0.342 mi.SWEEPS UST Relative: Lower Actual: 143 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTORANGE COVE, CA 93646 South LUST505 004TH ST N/A M74 HIST CORTESECLAUDE HOLT S101621222 TC4340409.2s Page 136 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ORANGE COVE 93646Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 505 004TH STMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 2096267929Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: 00046463Regulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 10007494Facility ID: CA FID UST: DIESEL ALSO.Summary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: KACStaff Initials: TMEStaff: Not reportedMTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: 10Max MTBE Soil: 2MTBE Concentration: 5Max MTBE GW: 4/4/1997MTBE Date: -117.892389Longitude: 33.7942553Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: <GW Qualifies: 10/2/1996Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: 11/14/1996Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 3/18/1998Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/20/1996Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 9/20/1996Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 10/2/1996Enter Date: 9/20/1996How Stopped Date: T0605901816Global ID: TankLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: CLAUDE HOLT (Continued)S101621222 TC4340409.2s Page 137 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1Number Of Tanks: REG UNLEADEDContent: PSTG: M.V. FUELTank Use: 07-01-85Active Date: 500Capacity: ATank Status: 10-000-046463-000001SWRCB Tank Id: 1Owner Tank Id: 02-29-88Created Date: Not reportedAction Date: 07-01-85Referral Date: 44-004309Board Of Equalization: 9Number: 46463Comp Number: ActiveStatus: SWEEPS UST: ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: CLAUDE HOLT (Continued)S101621222 T0605901679Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: CLOSEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083002305TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083002305TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1831 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster N 0.347 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW LUST1858 ANAHEIM BLVD N/A N75 HIST CORTESEJOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL S101126252 TC4340409.2s Page 138 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9006174Longitude: 33.8017841Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 9/20/1993Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/2/1995Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 12/22/1992Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 12/22/1993Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 9/20/1993Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: JOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL (Continued) S101126252 Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083002305TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 02/02/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9006174Longitude: 33.8017841Latitude: T0605901679Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 1877 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster N 0.355 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW Orange Co. Industrial Site1858 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/A N76 LUSTJOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL S109284528 TC4340409.2s Page 139 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation OtherAction Type: T0605901679Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 12/22/1992Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901679Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/02/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901679Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 02/02/1995Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901679Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/22/1993Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901679Global Id: 12/22/1992Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901679Global Id: 02/02/1995Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901679Global Id: Status History: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901679Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901679Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: JOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL (Continued) S109284528 TC4340409.2s Page 140 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LEAD COMPOUNDSReleased Chemical: Transferred to City ProgramClosure Type: CLOSED 8/4/1993Current Status: RO0000432Record ID: ORANGERegion: 93IC002Case ID: Orange Co. Industrial Site: Leak ReportedAction: 08/03/1993Date: JOHN DAVID INTERNATIONAL (Continued) S109284528 Not reportedGW Qualifies: 9/5/1989Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: 4/4/1991Date Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/15/1996Close Date: 1/1/1965Enforcement Date: 4/8/1989Discover Date: 7/26/1989Date Preliminary Assessment Began: 4/8/1989Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 9/5/1989Enter Date: 4/8/1989How Stopped Date: T0605900956Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank TestHow Discovered: State FundsFunding: None TakenEnf Type: CYPRESSCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001231TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083001231TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 1907 ft. Site 5 of 5 in cluster M 0.361 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 144 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92815 SSE LUST300 ANAHEIM N/A M77 HIST CORTESETAORMINA INDUSTRIES, INC.S104405115 TC4340409.2s Page 141 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation NE.W LE.AK FOUND 4/4/91. PROP 65 SE.NT AFTE.R 4/91. SITE. IS ALSO NAME.D BILLY’SSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9144656Longitude: 33.8377203Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: YesInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: TAORMINA INDUSTRIES, INC. (Continued) S104405115 ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900569Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083000719TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 08/19/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.89824Longitude: 33.80297Latitude: T0605900569Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2013 ft. 0.381 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 146 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 NW 818 E KATELLA AVE N/A 78 LUSTTEXACO SERVICE STATION S109284194 TC4340409.2s Page 142 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 10/05/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900569Global Id: Leak StoppedAction: 08/29/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900569Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 08/19/1998Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900569Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 08/29/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900569Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 12/18/1987Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900569Global Id: 09/25/1987Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900569Global Id: 08/29/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900569Global Id: 08/19/1998Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900569Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: nolson-martin@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: NANCY OLSON-MARTINContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900569Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued) S109284194 TC4340409.2s Page 143 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 04/03/1986Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900725Global Id: 04/03/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900725Global Id: Status History: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900725Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900725Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Other Solvent or Non-Petroleum HydrocarbonPotential Contaminants of Concern: Under InvestigationPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 85UT095LOC Case Number: Not reportedRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 04/03/1986Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8892834Longitude: 33.805899Latitude: T0605900725Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 083000912TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2061 ft. 0.390 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 157 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE LUST1701 STATE COLLEGE N/A 79 HIST CORTESECERTRON S105022515 TC4340409.2s Page 144 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8893552Longitude: 33.807958Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 4/3/1986Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 1/1/1965Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900725Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: 76,78933Substance: UndefinedCase Type: 85UT095Local Case Num: Not reportedCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 05/20/1986Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900725Global Id: Regulatory Activities: CERTRON (Continued)S105022515 TC4340409.2s Page 145 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: CERTRON (Continued)S105022515 Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 10/13/1987Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 10/15/1987Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 2/8/1991Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 9/10/1987Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 10/13/1987Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605900518Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: State FundsFunding: LFOREnf Type: LEWISCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: DieselSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000648TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083000648TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2328 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster O 0.441 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW LUST700 KATELLA N/A O80 HIST CORTESEWESTSIDE MATERIALS S102441230 TC4340409.2s Page 146 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: ROWStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9002804Longitude: 33.8032201Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: WESTSIDE MATERIALS (Continued) S102441230 Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900518Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: DieselPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083000648TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 02/08/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.89964Longitude: 33.802759Latitude: T0605900518Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2328 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster O 0.441 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 145 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WNW 700 E KATELLA AVE N/A O81 LUSTWESTSIDE MATERIALS S100939195 TC4340409.2s Page 147 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 09/28/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900518Global Id: Unauthorized Release FormAction: 02/02/1988Date: RESPONSEAction Type: T0605900518Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 09/10/1987Date: OtherAction Type: T0605900518Global Id: * Historical EnforcementAction: 09/28/1987Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900518Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 02/08/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900518Global Id: 10/15/1987Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605900518Global Id: 09/10/1987Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900518Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900518Global Id: WESTSIDE MATERIALS (Continued) S100939195 083000125TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2466 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster P 0.467 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTANAHEIM, CA 92806 NNE LUST1635 STATE COLLEGE N/A P82 HIST CORTESEDEL PISO BRICK COMPANY S101589203 TC4340409.2s Page 148 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8893602Longitude: 33.808553Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 8/8/1990Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 3/26/1990Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900097Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 90UT080Local Case Num: 083000125TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: DEL PISO BRICK COMPANY (Continued)S101589203 TC4340409.2s Page 149 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation ActiveStatus: Not reportedComments: Not reportedEPA ID: Not reportedNPDES Number: Not reportedDUNs Number: Not reportedContact Phone: Not reportedContact: ANAHEIM 92806Mailing City,St,Zip: Not reportedMailing Address 2: 1635 S STATE COLLEGE BLVDMailing Address: Not reportedMail To: 7146344676Facility Phone: Not reportedSIC Code: Not reportedCortese Code: Not reportedRegulated ID: UTNKARegulated By: 30003225Facility ID: CA FID UST: DEL PISO BRICK COMPANY (Continued) S101589203 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: ROSE SCOTTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900158Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: GasolinePotential Contaminants of Concern: Under InvestigationPotential Media Affect: Local AgencyFile Location: 86UT069LOC Case Number: 083000207TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 08/26/1986Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.8890322Longitude: 33.8069091Latitude: T0605900158Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 083000207TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2523 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster P 0.478 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NNE LUST1650 STATE COLLEGE N/A P83 HIST CORTESETEXACO OIL S102438801 TC4340409.2s Page 150 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 8/26/1986Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 1/1/1965Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900158Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: GasolineSubstance: UndefinedCase Type: 86UT069Local Case Num: 083000207TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Technical Correspondence / Assistance / OtherAction: 08/26/1986Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605900158Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 08/26/1986Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900158Global Id: 08/26/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900158Global Id: Status History: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900158Global Id: 9513206375Phone Number: rscott@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: TEXACO OIL (Continued)S102438801 TC4340409.2s Page 151 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: RSStaff: *MTBE Class: Site NOT Tested for MTBE.Includes Unknown and Not Analyzed.MTBE Tested: 1MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8890322Longitude: 33.8069091Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: TEXACO OIL (Continued)S102438801 Local AgencyFile Location: 86UT077LOC Case Number: 083000936TRB Case Number: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLocal Agency: AMCase Worker: ORANGE COUNTY LOPLead Agency: 07/11/1986Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.9006344Longitude: 33.8005611Latitude: T0605900745Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 083000936TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: 2526 ft. 0.478 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 142 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW LUST1901 MANCHESTER N/A 84 HIST CORTESEDANA EDWARDS S102428993 TC4340409.2s Page 152 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: 9/9/9999How Stopped Date: T0605900745Global ID: UnknownLeak Source: UnknownLeak Cause: Close TankHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: 0Qty Leaked: Paint ThinnerSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: 86UT077Local Case Num: 083000936TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 07/11/1986Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605900745Global Id: 07/11/1986Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605900745Global Id: Status History: 7144336011Phone Number: amartinez@ochca.comEmail: SANTA ANACity: 1241 E. DYER ROAD SUITE 120Address: ORANGE COUNTY LOPOrganization Name: ANTHONY MARTINEZContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900745Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: phannon@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: PATRICIA HANNONContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605900745Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Stoddard solvent / Mineral Spriits / DistillatesPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: DANA EDWARDS (Continued)S102428993 TC4340409.2s Page 153 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: MUNBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30000LLocal Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: WJStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.9006344Longitude: 33.8005611Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 7/11/1986Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 1/1/1965Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: DANA EDWARDS (Continued)S102428993 Non-GeneratorClassification: 09EPA Region: Not reportedContact email: (714) 385-1919Contact telephone: USContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2225 KATELLA AVEContact address: ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGERContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 KATELLA AVEMailing address: CAD981447949EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92806 2225 KATELLA AVEFacility address: STADIUM MOTORS, INCFacility name: 03/04/1986Date form received by agency: RCRA NonGen / NLR: 2543 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster Q 0.482 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/4-1/2 LUSTANAHEIM, CA 92806 NE HIST CORTESE2225 KATELLA AVE CAD981447949 Q85 RCRA NonGen / NLRSTADIUM MOTORS, INC 1000189689 TC4340409.2s Page 154 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083001785TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 083001785TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: No violations foundViolation Status: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: Not reportedOwner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (415) 555-1212Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: NOT REQUIRED, ME 99999 NOT REQUIREDOwner/operator address: R MCCLUREOwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: Handler: Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous wasteDescription: STADIUM MOTORS, INC (Continued) 1000189689 TC4340409.2s Page 155 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.885836Longitude: 33.8041801Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 3/1/1991Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 8/1/1991Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 1/22/1991Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 1/22/1991Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 3/1/1991Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605901337Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Subsurface MonitoringHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: Waste OilSubstance: STADIUM MOTORS, INC (Continued) 1000189689 TC4340409.2s Page 156 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/01/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605901337Global Id: 01/22/1991Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605901337Global Id: 01/22/1991Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605901337Global Id: Status History: Not reportedPhone Number: rmccaffrey@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. MS 601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RALPH MCCAFFREYContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901337Global Id: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605901337Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: Waste Oil / Motor / Hydraulic / LubricatingPotential Contaminants of Concern: SoilPotential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083001785TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: RMCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 08/01/1991Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.885124Longitude: 33.805471Latitude: T0605901337Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2543 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster Q 0.482 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NE 2225 E KATELLA AVE N/A Q86 LUSTSTADIUM MOTORS S103643029 TC4340409.2s Page 157 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Leak ReportedAction: 02/14/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901337Global Id: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: 08/01/1991Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605901337Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 01/22/1991Date: OtherAction Type: T0605901337Global Id: Regulatory Activities: STADIUM MOTORS (Continued)S103643029 3737 MAIN STREET, SUITE 500Address: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Organization Name: CARL BERNHARDTContact Name: Regional Board CaseworkerContact Type: T0605919150Global Id: Not reportedPhone Number: dwilson@anaheim.netEmail: ANAHEIMCity: 201 S. ANAHEIM BLVD. #601Address: ANAHEIM CITY LOPOrganization Name: RICHARD O. WILSONContact Name: Local Agency CaseworkerContact Type: T0605919150Global Id: Contact: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reportedSite History: BenzenePotential Contaminants of Concern: Other Groundwater (uses other than drinking water)Potential Media Affect: Not reportedFile Location: Not reportedLOC Case Number: 083003967TRB Case Number: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLocal Agency: ROWCase Worker: ANAHEIM CITY LOPLead Agency: 08/26/2008Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: LUST Cleanup SiteCase Type: -117.884092Longitude: 33.805754Latitude: T0605919150Global Id: STATERegion: LUST: 2629 ft. 0.498 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 159 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92806 NE 2331 KATELLA AVE., E. N/A 87 LUSTSHELL OIL PRODUCTS US S105850480 TC4340409.2s Page 158 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 08/26/2008Date: ENFORCEMENTAction Type: T0605919150Global Id: Leak ReportedAction: 04/02/2003Date: OtherAction Type: T0605919150Global Id: Other (Use Description Field)Action: 04/10/2003Date: REMEDIATIONAction Type: T0605919150Global Id: Leak DiscoveryAction: 04/02/2003Date: OtherAction Type: T0605919150Global Id: Regulatory Activities: 11/03/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605919150Global Id: 08/04/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605919150Global Id: 05/23/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605919150Global Id: 04/02/2003Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605919150Global Id: 04/02/2003Status Date: Open - Case Begin DateStatus: T0605919150Global Id: 08/26/2008Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedStatus: T0605919150Global Id: 12/08/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605919150Global Id: 05/26/2005Status Date: Open - Site AssessmentStatus: T0605919150Global Id: Status History: 9517824495Phone Number: cbernhardt@waterboards.ca.govEmail: RIVERSIDECity: SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US (Continued) S105850480 TC4340409.2s Page 159 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: Not reportedHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: SWStaff Initials: CABStaff: *MTBE Class: MTBE Detected. Site tested for MTBE & MTBE detectedMTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: 34Max MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: 1Max MTBE GW: 10/26/2004MTBE Date: 0Longitude: 0Latitude: LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: =Soil Qualifies: NDGW Qualifies: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 4/2/2003Discover Date: 11/3/2003Date Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: Not reportedEnter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605919150Global ID: UNKLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: SASHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: STATE COLLEGE BLVD.Cross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: BenzeneSubstance: Other ground water affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003967TCase Number: Preliminary site assessment underwayFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: Closure/No Further Action LetterAction: SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US (Continued)S105850480 TC4340409.2s Page 160 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: SHELL OIL PRODUCTS US (Continued) S105850480 NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8857Longitude: 33.80735Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 12/16/1993Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 30280129Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: Not reported well 4/10-25. ACCORDING TO EPA, THIS SITE HAS LOW PRIORITY ON NPL LIST SITE TO EPA recommending GW Cleanup due to elevated levels of TCE in at the site and DHS approved closure on 11/8/1983. 1/9/89 DHS REFERED Soil Excavation at site in 1983 provided adequate remediation of soilSite History: Not reportedPotential Contaminants of Concern: Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Regional BoardFile Location: Not reportedRB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.886132Longitude: 33.806987Latitude: SLT8R146Lead Agency Case Number: US ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCYLead Agency: SLT8R1464091Global Id: 01/09/1989Status Date: Open - RemediationFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 2898 ft. 0.549 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 158 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92804 NNE ENVIROSTOR2211 EAST HOWELL STREET N/A 88 SLICITASCO S101541102 TC4340409.2s Page 161 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: of contaminated soil was removed. RA Soil. Site has been hazard mitigated. Clean-up complete. 294 tonsComments: 11/08/1983Completed Date: Removal Action Completion ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Site Screening Done: CERCLA grant Preliminary Assessment required.Comments: 05/06/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Soil sample levels (11/04/83) below TTLC and TLC. excavated to depth of eight feet; 409 tons of soil removed to BKK. BKK (04/15/83). Samples (05/11/83) show solvent contamination. Site Preliminary Assessment Done: Twenty yards, three of waste, removed toComments: 01/08/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: unlined sump. 1200ppm of TCE would remain within 8 feet of the surface in an backfilled with clean soil. It is not reasonable to believe that depth. No sampling was done below the 8 feet that was excavated and either surface samples or samp- les collected at a maximum if 8 ft. work at the site: Soil samples collected during cleanup in 1983 were recommends hazard ranking. Reasons for recommend- ation of further Site Inspection Done: EPA recommends Listing Site Inspec- tion; DHSComments: 09/26/1989Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: firm acid rinse goes into manhole. Facility identified via tip from Orange County Sanitary District -Comments: 05/28/1981Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280129Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD982359879Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: MICHAEL-RAND PLATINGAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: WITH METALS Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs * OTHER ORGANIC SOLIDS * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS * ACID SOLUTION 2>PHPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: ITASCO (Continued)S101541102 TC4340409.2s Page 162 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: ITASCO (Continued)S101541102 Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30000017Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8935Longitude: 33.78952Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 12/05/2000Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 30000017Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 3142 ft. 0.595 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 134 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92868 South 3745 WEST CHAPMAN AVENUE N/A 89 ENVIROSTORTHE CITY PLACE NORTH S103967976 TC4340409.2s Page 163 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: THE CITY PLACE NORTH (Continued) S103967976 Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/13/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30880003Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404300Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (PROPOSED)Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM CITY SD-PROPOSED PONDEROSA ELEMAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsPotential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREAPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9068Longitude: 33.81309Latitude: School DistrictFunding: NORestricted Use: 08/07/2003Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: Not reportedSpecial Program Status: 34Senate: 69Assembly: 404300Site Code: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProject Manager: * DTSCLead Agency Description: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCCleanup Oversight Agencies: NONational Priorities List: 14.06Acres: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt. Req.: SchoolSite Type Detail: School InvestigationSite Type: 30880003Facility ID: SCH: 3418 ft. 0.647 mi. Relative: Lower Actual: 134 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 WSW ENVIROSTORMOUNTAIN VIEW AVENUE/WILKEN WAY N/A 90 SCHPONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL S105628715 TC4340409.2s Page 164 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation School DistrictFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Shahir HaddadSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: DTSCLead Agency: DTSCRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 14.06Acres: SchoolSite Type Detailed: School InvestigationSite Type: 404300Site Code: 08/07/2003Status Date: No Further ActionStatus: 30880003Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/11/2003Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/15/2002Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/29/2002Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/18/2002Completed Date: * WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approve PEA with a No Further Action determinationComments: 08/07/2003Completed Date: PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued)S105628715 TC4340409.2s Page 165 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: 08/11/2003Completed Date: Cost Recovery Closeout MemoCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/15/2002Completed Date: Environmental Oversight AgreementCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/29/2002Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 07/18/2002Completed Date: * WorkplanCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: DTSC approve PEA with a No Further Action determinationComments: 08/07/2003Completed Date: Preliminary Endangerment Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Not reportedComments: 01/13/2003Completed Date: Site Inspections/Visit (Non LUR)Completed Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30880003Alias Name: Project Code (Site Code)Alias Type: 404300Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (PROPOSED)Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM CITY SD-PROPOSED PONDEROSA ELEMAlias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: ANAHEIM CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTAlias Name: SOILPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBsPotential COC: RESIDENTIAL AREAPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9068Longitude: 33.81309Latitude: PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued)S105628715 TC4340409.2s Page 166 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: PONDEROSA ELEMENTARY SCHOOL (Continued) S105628715 Not reported Not reportedOwner/operator address: JUAN MARTINOwner/operator name: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 01/10/1975Owner/Op start date: OwnerOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: (310) 837-9100Owner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: LOS ANGELES, CA 90035 PO BOX 35147Owner/operator address: ABRAHAM WINTEROwner/operator name: Owner/Operator Summary: 100 kg of that material at any time hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than from the cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely of any residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting kg of acutely hazardous waste at any time; or generates 100 kg or less hazardous waste during any calendar month, and accumulates more than 1 waste during any calendar month; or generates 1 kg or less of acutely cleanup of a spill, into or on any land or water, of acutely hazardous residue or contaminated soil, waste or other debris resulting from the during any calendar month; or generates more than 100 kg of any calendar month; or generates more than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste Handler: generates 1,000 kg or more of hazardous waste during anyDescription: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: PrivateLand type: 09EPA Region: ROSASUPERIOR@AOL.COMContact email: (714) 774-1174Contact telephone: Not reportedContact country: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 E CERRITOS AVEContact address: ROSA MARTINContact: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 E CERRITOS AVEMailing address: CAD982459471EPA ID: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 1901 E CERRITOS AVEFacility address: SUPERIOR PLATINGFacility name: 03/01/2014Date form received by agency: RCRA-LQG: 4040 ft.ENVIROSTOR 0.765 mi.EMI Relative: Higher Actual: 163 ft. 1/2-1 NPDESANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE FINDS1901 E CERRITOS AVE CAD982459471 91 RCRA-LQGSUPERIOR PLATING 1000473118 TC4340409.2s Page 167 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation CORROSIVE WASTE. Waste name: D002. Waste code: 213. Waste name: 213. Waste code: 211. Waste name: 211. Waste code: 181. Waste name: 181. Waste code: Large Quantity GeneratorClassification: SUPERIOR PLATINGSite name: 06/15/2010Date form received by agency: Historical Generators: SPENT CYANIDE PLATING BATH SOLUTIONS FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS.. Waste name: F007. Waste code: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC, AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS, EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: NoUsed oil transporter: NoUsed oil transfer facility: NoUsed oil Specification marketer: NoUsed oil fuel marketer to burner: NoUser oil refiner: NoUsed oil processor: NoUsed oil fuel burner: NoFurnace exemption: NoOn-site burner exemption: NoUnderground injection activity: NoTreater, storer or disposer of HW: NoTransporter of hazardous waste: NoRecycler of hazardous waste: NoMixed waste (haz. and radioactive): NoU.S. importer of hazardous waste: Handler Activities Summary: Not reportedOwner/Op end date: 03/28/1994Owner/Op start date: OperatorOwner/Operator Type: PrivateLegal status: Not reportedOwner/operator telephone: Not reportedOwner/operator country: SUPERIOR PLATING (Continued)1000473118 TC4340409.2s Page 168 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 06/30/2009Evaluation date: StateEvaluation lead agency: 07/12/2011Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: 06/23/2011Evaluation date: Evaluation Action Summary: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: Not reported Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: Not reported Enforcement action date: Not reported Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 07/30/2009Date achieved compliance: 06/30/2009Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Not reported Paid penalty amount: Not reported Final penalty amount: Not reported Proposed penalty amount: State Enforcement lead agency: Not reported Enf. disp. status date: Not reported Enf. disposition status: 06/23/2011 Enforcement action date: WRITTEN INFORMAL Enforcement action: StateViolation lead agency: 07/12/2011Date achieved compliance: 06/23/2011Date violation determined: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: Not reportedRegulation violated: Facility Has Received Notices of Violations: Small Quantity GeneratorClassification: SUPERIOR PLATINGSite name: 12/20/1994Date form received by agency: ALUMINUM. PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; AND (6) CHEMICAL ETCHING AND MILLING OF STEEL; (5) CLEANING/STRIPPING ASSOCIATED WITH TIN, ZINC, AND ALUMINUM ON CARBON STEEL; (4) ALUMINUM OR ZINC-ALUMINUM PLATING ON CARBON (2) TIN PLATING ON CARBON STEEL; (3) ZINC PLATING (SEGREGATED BASIS) FROM THE FOLLOWING PROCESSES: (1) SULFURIC ACID ANODIZING OF ALUMINUM; WASTEWATER TREATMENT SLUDGES FROM ELECTROPLATING OPERATIONS, EXCEPT. Waste name: F006. Waste code: CHROMIUM. Waste name: D007. Waste code: CADMIUM. Waste name: D006. Waste code: SUPERIOR PLATING (Continued)1000473118 TC4340409.2s Page 169 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Juan MartinOPERATOR NAME: rosasuperior@aol.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-774-1174FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Rosa MartinFACILITY CONTACT NAME: SqFtPLACE SIZE UNIT: 7800PLACE SIZE: 08/09/2010STATUS DATE: ActiveSTATUS CODE NAME: 07/06/2005PROCESSED DATE: 05/09/2008RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30I019627WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: IndustrialRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 288957Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: NPDES: HAZARDOUS WASTE BIENNIAL REPORTER corrective action activities required under RCRA. program staff to track the notification, permit, compliance, and and treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste. RCRAInfo allows RCRA events and activities related to facilities that generate, transport, Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) program through the tracking of RCRAInfo is a national information system that supports the Resource facilities. generators, transporters, and treatment, storage, and disposal provides California with information on hazardous waste shipments for California Hazardous Waste Tracking System - Datamart (HWTS-DATAMART) Environmental Interest/Information System 110002815204Registry ID: FINDS: StateEvaluation lead agency: 07/30/2009Date achieved compliance: Generators - GeneralArea of violation: COMPLIANCE EVALUATION INSPECTION ON-SITEEvaluation: SUPERIOR PLATING (Continued)1000473118 TC4340409.2s Page 170 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 07/06/2005Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: IndustrialProgram Type: 8 30I019627WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 97-03-DWQOrder No: 288957Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: ActiveFacility Status: CAS000001Npdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: 3471-Electroplating, Plating, Polishing, Anodizing, and ColoringPRIMARY SIC: 30-JUN-05CERTIFICATION DATE: Office Safety MngrCERTIFIER TITLE: Rosa MartinCERTIFIER NAME: Santa Ana RiverRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: 714-774-1174EMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: rosasuperior@aol.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 714-774-1174OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Rosa MartinOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92805OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: AnaheimOPERATOR CITY: 1901 E Cerritos AveOPERATOR ADDRESS: SUPERIOR PLATING (Continued)1000473118 TC4340409.2s Page 171 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92805Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: AnaheimDischarge City: 1901 E Cerritos AveDischarge Address: Juan MartinDischarge Name: Not reportedTermination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: SUPERIOR PLATING (Continued)1000473118 TC4340409.2s Page 172 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110002815204Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD982459471Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8899Longitude: 33.81062Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71003048Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 0Part. Matter 10 Micrometers & Smllr Tons/Yr: 1Particulate Matter Tons/Yr: 0SOX - Oxides of Sulphur Tons/Yr: 0NOX - Oxides of Nitrogen Tons/Yr: 0Carbon Monoxide Emissions Tons/Yr: 0Reactive Organic Gases Tons/Yr: 1Total Organic Hydrocarbon Gases Tons/Yr: Not reportedConsolidated Emission Reporting Rule: Not reportedCommunity Health Air Pollution Info System: SOUTH COAST AQMDAir District Name: 9999SIC Code: SCAir District Name: 80988Facility ID: SCAir Basin: 30County Code: 1990Year: EMI: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: SUPERIOR PLATING (Continued)1000473118 TC4340409.2s Page 173 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71003048Alias Name: SUPERIOR PLATING (Continued)1000473118 Not reportedOPERATOR NAME: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT NAME: Not reportedPLACE SIZE UNIT: Not reportedPLACE SIZE: Not reportedSTATUS DATE: Not reportedSTATUS CODE NAME: Not reportedPROCESSED DATE: Not reportedRECEIVED DATE: 92660Discharge Zip: CaliforniaDischarge State: Newport BeachDischarge City: 500 Newport Center Drive Ste 630Discharge Address: PSIP WR Anaheim LLCDischarge Name: 12/05/2013Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: 06/21/2012Effective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: ConstructionProgram Type: 8 30C363921WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: EnrolleeRegulatory Measure Type: 2009-0009-DWQOrder No: 427902Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: 0Agency Id: TerminatedFacility Status: CAS000002Npdes Number: NPDES: 4660 ft.ENVIROSTOR 0.883 mi.ENF Relative: Higher Actual: 165 ft. 1/2-1 LUSTANAHEIM, CA 92806 NNE HIST CORTESE2201 CERRITOS AVE N/A 92 NPDESNEVILLE CHEMICAL S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 174 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedEffective Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedAdoption Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedProgram Type: 8 30C363921WDID: Not reportedPlace Id: ConstructionRegulatory Measure Type: Not reportedOrder No: 427902Regulatory Measure Id: 8Region: Not reportedAgency Id: Not reportedFacility Status: Not reportedNpdes Number: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: Not reportedCERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Not reportedCERTIFIER NAME: Not reportedRECEIVING WATER NAME: Not reportedDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: Not reportedCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: Not reportedDEVELOPER ZIP: Not reportedDEVELOPER STATE: Not reportedDEVELOPER CITY: Not reportedDEVELOPER ADDRESS: Not reportedDEVELOPER NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR TYPE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: Not reportedOPERATOR ZIP: Not reportedOPERATOR STATE: Not reportedOPERATOR CITY: Not reportedOPERATOR ADDRESS: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 175 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Santa Ana RiverRECEIVING WATER NAME: NDIR DISCHARGE USWATER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE WATER SEWER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE UTILITY DESCRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE TRANSPORT IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RESIDENTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE RECONS IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE OTHER DESRIPTION: Not reportedCONSTYPE INDUSTRIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE GAS LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ELECTRICAL LINE IND: YCONSTYPE COMMERTIAL IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE COMM LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE CABLE LINE IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE BELOW GROUND IND: Not reportedCONSTYPE ABOVE GROUND IND: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE EXT: Not reportedEMERGENCY PHONE NO: NCONSTYPE LINEAR UTILITY IND: Not reportedDEVELOPER CONTACT TITLE: Vance MapeDEVELOPER CONTACT NAME: 92660DEVELOPER ZIP: CaliforniaDEVELOPER STATE: Newport BeachDEVELOPER CITY: 500 Newport Center Drive Ste 630DEVELOPER ADDRESS: PSIP WR Anaheim LLCDEVELOPER NAME: Private BusinessOPERATOR TYPE: vmape@westernrealco.comOPERATOR CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT PHONE EXT: 949-720-3787OPERATOR CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedOPERATOR CONTACT TITLE: Vance MapeOPERATOR CONTACT NAME: 92660OPERATOR ZIP: CaliforniaOPERATOR STATE: Newport BeachOPERATOR CITY: 500 Newport Center Drive Ste 630OPERATOR ADDRESS: PSIP WR Anaheim LLCOPERATOR NAME: vmape@westernrealco.comFACILITY CONTACT EMAIL: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT PHONE EXT: 949-720-3787FACILITY CONTACT PHONE: Not reportedFACILITY CONTACT TITLE: Vance MapeFACILITY CONTACT NAME: AcresPLACE SIZE UNIT: 10.5PLACE SIZE: 02/11/2014STATUS DATE: TerminatedSTATUS CODE NAME: 06/21/2012PROCESSED DATE: 06/06/2012RECEIVED DATE: Not reportedDischarge Zip: Not reportedDischarge State: Not reportedDischarge City: Not reportedDischarge Address: Not reportedDischarge Name: 12/05/2013Termination Date Of Regulatory Measure: Not reportedExpiration Date Of Regulatory Measure: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 176 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 10/15/1987Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: Not reportedDate Remediation Plan Submitted: 10/15/1987Date Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: 11/29/1987Close Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: Not reportedDiscover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: Not reportedDate Confirmation of Leak Began: 10/15/1987Enter Date: Not reportedHow Stopped Date: T0605900528Global ID: Not reportedLeak Source: Not reportedLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Not reportedHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: Not reportedCross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: SolventsSubstance: Soil onlyCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083000667TCase Number: Case ClosedFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: LUST REG 8: 8 302606N01Reg Id: WBC&DReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: 083000667TReg Id: LTNKAReg By: 30Facility County Code: CORTESERegion: HIST CORTESE: Not reportedTERTIARY SIC: Not reportedSECONDARY SIC: Not reportedPRIMARY SIC: 06-JUN-12CERTIFICATION DATE: Not reportedCERTIFIER TITLE: Vance MapeCERTIFIER NAME: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 177 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation LUSTOversite Program: Not reportedInterim: Not reportedFacility Contact: Not reportedOperator: Not reportedSoil Qualifies: Not reportedGW Qualifies: 11/3/1999Enter Date: Not reportedDate Post Remedial Action Monitoring: Not reportedDate Remedial Action Underway: 11/3/1998Date Remediation Plan Submitted: Not reportedDate Pollution Characterization Began: Not reportedDate Prelim Assessment Workplan Submitted: Not reportedClose Date: Not reportedEnforcement Date: 8/25/1998Discover Date: Not reportedDate Preliminary Assessment Began: 11/3/1998Date Confirmation of Leak Began: 11/3/1999Enter Date: 9/22/1998How Stopped Date: T0605902328Global ID: PipingLeak Source: UNKLeak Cause: Not reportedHow Stopped: Tank ClosureHow Discovered: Not reportedFunding: Not reportedEnf Type: STATE COLLEGECross Street: Not reportedAbate Method: Not reportedQty Leaked: HydrocarbonsSubstance: Aquifer affectedCase Type: Not reportedLocal Case Num: 083003566TCase Number: Remediation PlanFacility Status: Santa Ana RegionRegional Board: OrangeCounty: 8Region: Not reportedSummary: Not reportedWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Local AgencyLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: PAHStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.8854541Longitude: 33.810717Latitude: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 178 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation 1# Of Programs: UNREGSProgram Category2: UNREGSProgram Category1: UNREGSProgram: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 4: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 3: Not reportedFacility Waste Type 2: Not reportedFacility Waste Type: Not reportedPretreatment: Not reportedComplexity: Not reportedThreat To Water Quality: Not reportedDesign Flow: Reg MeasSource Of Facility: 1# Of Places: Not reportedNAICS Desc 3: Not reportedNAICS Code 3: Not reportedNAICS Desc 2: Not reportedNAICS Code 2: Not reportedNAICS Desc 1: Not reportedNAICS Code 1: Not reportedSIC Desc 3: Not reportedSIC Code 3: Not reportedSIC Desc 2: Not reportedSIC Code 2: Sanitary Services, NECSIC Desc 1: 4959SIC Code 1: Not reportedPlace Longitude: Not reportedPlace Latitude: 1# Of Agencies: Privately-Owned BusinessAgency Type: IndustrialFacility Type: Not reportedPlace Subtype: FacilityPlace Type: Neville ChemicalAgency Name: 228567Facility Id: 8Region: ENF: Not reportedSummary: NoWork Suspended: Not reportedCleanup Fund Id: Not reportedPriority: Not reportedBeneficial: COASTAL PLAIN OF ORAHydr Basin #: 30011Local Agency: Regional BoardLead Agency: UNKStaff Initials: MGCStaff: *MTBE Class: Not Required to be Tested.MTBE Tested: 0MTBE Fuel: Not reportedMax MTBE Soil: 0MTBE Concentration: Not reportedMax MTBE GW: Not reportedMTBE Date: -117.885261Longitude: 33.810737Latitude: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 179 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 02/09/2009Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 30280120Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 0.00Total $ Paid/Completed Amount: 0.00Project $ Completed: 0.00Liability $ Paid: 0.00Project $ Amount: 0.00Liability $ Amount: 0.00Initial Assessed Amount: 0.00Total Assessment Amount: 1# Of Programs1: Not reportedLatest Milestone Completion Date: UNREGSProgram: INVESTIGATION ORDERDescription: CAO 89-14 for Neville ChemicalTitle: HistoricalStatus: Not reportedEPL Issuance Date: Not reportedACL Issuance Date: 07/12/2011Termination Date: Not reportedAchieve Date: Not reportedAdoption/Issuance Date: 01/12/1989Effective Date: Clean-up and Abatement OrderEnforcement Action Type: 89-014Order / Resolution Number: 8Region: 223917Enforcement Id(EID): PassiveDirection/Voice: Not reportedFee Code: IIndividual/General: NStatus Enrollee: Not reportedWDR Review - Planned: Not reportedWDR Review - Pending: Not reportedWDR Review - No Action Required: Not reportedWDR Review - Rescind: Not reportedWDR Review - Revise/Renew: Not reportedWDR Review - Amend: Not reportedTermination Date: Not reportedExpiration/Review Date: Not reportedEffective Date: 02/21/2013Status Date: Never ActiveStatus: Not reportedApplication Fee Amt Received: Not reported301H: Not reportedDredge Fill Fee: Not reportedReclamation: Not reportedNpdes Type: Not reportedMajor-Minor: Not reportedNpdes# CA#: Not reportedOrder #: 8Region: UnregulatedReg Measure Type: 158765Reg Measure Id: 8 302606N01WDID: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 180 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reported PRELIM ASSESS DONE PENDING STATUS BASED ON OUTCOME OF SITE INSPECTION.Comments: 06/27/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ISSUES, THEREFORE, DHS STATUS IS PENDING. SITE INSP DONE SANTA ANA RWQCB IS CURRENTLY ADDRESSING CONTAMINATIONComments: 05/10/1989Completed Date: *Site Inspection (SI) ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Reassessment completed by DTSC and approved by EPAComments: 02/09/2009Completed Date: PA/SI ReassessmentCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280120Alias Name: GeoTracker Global IDAlias Type: SL0605956547Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000480998Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD008364150Alias Name: APNAlias Type: 083-210-31Alias Name: NMAPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: SLUDGE OTHER PESTICIDE CONTAINERS, 30 GALLONS OR MORE * TETRAETHYL LEAD METALS * TANK BOTTOM WASTES * UNSPECIFIED OIL CONTAINING WASTE * * OTHER ORGANIC SOLIDS * CONTAMINATED SOIL * ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH SOLVENTS * ORGANIC LIQUIDS WITH METALS * ORGANIC SOLIDS WITH HALOGENS * HALOGENATED ORGANIC COMPOUNDS * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * HYDROCARBONPotential COC: MANUFACTURING - CHEMICALSPast Use: 083-210-31APN: -117.8855Longitude: 33.81184Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: EPA - PASISpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Southern California Schools & Brownfields OutreachDivision Branch: Emad YemutSupervisor: Eileen MananianProgram Manager: RWQCB 8 - Santa AnaLead Agency: RWQCB 8 - Santa AnaRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: 18.6Acres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 181 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: Not reportedCompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 71002209Alias Name: EPA (FRS #)Alias Type: 110000480998Alias Name: EPA Identification NumberAlias Type: CAD008364150Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8860Longitude: 33.81201Latitude: Not reportedFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Not reportedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: Tiered PermitSite Type Detailed: Tiered PermitSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: Not reportedStatus Date: Inactive - Needs EvaluationStatus: 71002209Facility ID: Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Site Screening CompletedComments: 04/12/2006Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE MORE INFO NEEDEDComments: 05/29/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 TC4340409.2s Page 182 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: Not reportedComments: Not reportedCompleted Date: Not reportedCompleted Document Type: NEVILLE CHEMICAL (Continued)S101541105 Not reportedFuture Area Name: SB 1248 Orange CountyComments: 02/20/2001Completed Date: SB 1248 NotificationCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30300130Alias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.9009Longitude: 33.81163Latitude: Not ApplicableFunding: NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: Not reportedSpecial Program: 34Senate: 69Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: Referred - Not AssignedSupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: EvaluationSite Type Detailed: EvaluationSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 03/02/2001Status Date: Refer: 1248 Local AgencyStatus: 30300130Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: 4683 ft. 0.887 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 152 ft. 1/2-1 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NW 611 EAST CERRITOS AVENUE N/A 93 ENVIROSTORSILGAN PLASTICS CORPORATION S106797612 TC4340409.2s Page 183 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: SILGAN PLASTICS CORPORATION (Continued) S106797612 NONE SPECIFIEDSite Mgmt Req: NORestricted Use: * CERC2Special Program: 37Senate: 68Assembly: Cleanup CypressDivision Branch: * MmonroySupervisor: Not reportedProgram Manager: NONE SPECIFIEDLead Agency: NONE SPECIFIEDRegulatory Agencies: NONPL: Not reportedAcres: * HistoricalSite Type Detailed: HistoricalSite Type: Not reportedSite Code: 06/01/1995Status Date: Refer: RWQCBStatus: 30280305Facility ID: ENVIROSTOR: Click here to access the California GeoTracker records for this facility: abandoned on 10/13/05. BORINGS)TO BEGIN BY 4/92. Closure granted 5/7/05. On-Site wells PHASE III WORK (1 ONSITE WELL, 4 OFFSITE WELLS, AND 11 SOILSite History: Trichloroethylene (TCE) 1,1,1-Trichloroethane (TCA), Tetrachloroethylene (PCE),Potential Contaminants of Concern: Not reportedPotential Media Affected: Not reportedFile Location: SLT8R143RB Case Number: Not reportedLocal Agency: Not reportedCase Worker: Cleanup Program SiteCase Type: -117.87325Longitude: 33.802429Latitude: Not reportedLead Agency Case Number: SANTA ANA RWQCB (REGION 8)Lead Agency: SLT8R1434141Global Id: 04/07/2005Status Date: Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: STATERegion: SLIC: 4720 ft. 0.894 mi. Relative: Higher Actual: 160 ft. 1/2-1 ORANGE, CA 92867 ENE ENVIROSTOR2023 WEST COLLINS AVENUE N/A 94 SLICINLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CO.S101481425 TC4340409.2s Page 184 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: additional characterization is underway (Status 5). NFA for DTSC. SA RWQCB’S SLIC list indicates that the Board is the lead andComments: 06/01/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: FACILITY IDENTIFIED FROM PREVIOUS EMPLOYEES FILES.Comments: 07/01/1982Completed Date: * DiscoveryCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE CERCLA GRANT PA REQ’D.Comments: 05/04/1987Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE SI LOW NEEDED TO VERIFY THAT SITE IS CONTAMINATEDComments: 04/15/1988Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: ACTIVITY UNDER THE DIRECTION OF FIRE DEPT NO RECORDS REGARDING ANY CLEAN UP CENTIFUGAL PUMPS OWN THE PROPERTY A NO OF UNDERGROUND WAS REMOVED PRELIM ASSESS DONE INLAND SPECIALTIES CO NO LONGER IN BUSINESSComments: 05/04/1988Completed Date: Preliminary Assessment ReportCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: SITE SCREENING DONE E&E REVIEW OF DHS PA RECOMMENDS NFA FOR EPAComments: 09/19/1988Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: Not reportedCompleted Sub Area Name: PROJECT WIDECompleted Area Name: Completed Info: Envirostor ID NumberAlias Type: 30280305Alias Name: Alternate NameAlias Type: CALIFORNIA CENTRIFUGAL PUMPSAlias Name: NONE SPECIFIEDPotential Description: NONE SPECIFIEDConfirmed COC: Sludge - Paint * UNSPECIFIED SOLVENT MIXTURES ACID SOLUTION 2>PH WITH METALS * ALKALINE SOLUTION WITHOUT METALS * * HALOGENATED SOLVENTS * OXYGENATED SOLVENTS * CONTAMINATED SOIL *Potential COC: NONE SPECIFIEDPast Use: NONE SPECIFIEDAPN: -117.8743Longitude: 33.80315Latitude: Not reportedFunding: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CO. (Continued) S101481425 TC4340409.2s Page 185 MAP FINDINGSMap ID Direction EDR ID NumberDistance EPA ID NumberDatabase(s)SiteElevation Not reportedSchedule Revised Date: Not reportedSchedule Due Date: Not reportedSchedule Document Type: Not reportedSchedule Sub Area Name: Not reportedSchedule Area Name: Not reportedFuture Due Date: Not reportedFuture Document Type: Not reportedFuture Sub Area Name: Not reportedFuture Area Name: additional characterization is midway. (status 5). NFA for DTSC. SA RWQCB’s SLIC list indicates that the Board is the lead andComments: 05/02/1995Completed Date: Site ScreeningCompleted Document Type: INLAND SPECIALTY CHEMICAL CO. (Continued) S101481425 TC4340409.2s Page 186 OR P H A N S U M M A R Y Cit y ED R I D Si t e N a m e Si t e A d d r e s s Zip Database(s) Co u n t : 3 r e c o r d s . AN A H E I M S1 0 6 6 6 0 9 8 2 AN A H E I M A U T O A F F A I R 60 1 A N A H E I M 92805 LUST AN A H E I M S1 1 7 6 9 4 0 9 6 A T O W N S T A D I U M NE C S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D & O R A N G 92805 NPDES AN A H E I M S1 1 2 8 9 2 1 0 2 AR B O R P A R K A P A R T M E N T S 12 1 9 N S T A T E C O L L E G E L E A S I N G O 92806 HAZNET TC 4 3 4 0 4 0 9 . 2 s P a g e 1 8 7 To maintain currency of the following federal and state databases, EDR contacts the appropriate governmental agency on a monthly or quarterly basis, as required. Number of Days to Update:Provides confirmation that EDR is reporting records that have been updated within 90 days from the date the government agency made the information available to the public. STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list NPL: National Priority List National Priorities List (Superfund). The NPL is a subset of CERCLIS and identifies over 1,200 sites for priority cleanup under the Superfund Program. NPL sites may encompass relatively large areas. As such, EDR provides polygon coverage for over 1,000 NPL site boundaries produced by EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) and regional EPA offices. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL Site Boundaries Sources: EPA’s Environmental Photographic Interpretation Center (EPIC) Telephone: 202-564-7333 EPA Region 1 EPA Region 6 Telephone 617-918-1143 Telephone: 214-655-6659 EPA Region 3 EPA Region 7 Telephone 215-814-5418 Telephone: 913-551-7247 EPA Region 4 EPA Region 8 Telephone 404-562-8033 Telephone: 303-312-6774 EPA Region 5 EPA Region 9 Telephone 312-886-6686 Telephone: 415-947-4246 EPA Region 10 Telephone 206-553-8665 Proposed NPL: Proposed National Priority List Sites A site that has been proposed for listing on the National Priorities List through the issuance of a proposed rule in the Federal Register. EPA then accepts public comments on the site, responds to the comments, and places on the NPL those sites that continue to meet the requirements for listing. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly NPL LIENS: Federal Superfund Liens Federal Superfund Liens. Under the authority granted the USEPA by CERCLA of 1980, the USEPA has the authority to file liens against real property in order to recover remedial action expenditures or when the property owner received notification of potential liability. USEPA compiles a listing of filed notices of Superfund Liens. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1991 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/02/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/30/1994 Number of Days to Update: 56 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4267 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4340409.2s Page GR-1 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Delisted NPL: National Priority List Deletions The National Oil and Hazardous Substances Pollution Contingency Plan (NCP) establishes the criteria that the EPA uses to delete sites from the NPL. In accordance with 40 CFR 300.425.(e), sites may be deleted from the NPL where no further response is appropriate. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 75 Source: EPA Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal CERCLIS list CERCLIS: Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Information System CERCLIS contains data on potentially hazardous waste sites that have been reported to the USEPA by states, municipalities, private companies and private persons, pursuant to Section 103 of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA). CERCLIS contains sites which are either proposed to or on the National Priorities List (NPL) and sites which are in the screening and assessment phase for possible inclusion on the NPL. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDERAL FACILITY: Federal Facility Site Information listing A listing of National Priority List (NPL) and Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) sites found in the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) Database where EPA Federal Facilities Restoration and Reuse Office is involved in cleanup activities. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8704 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site List CERCLIS-NFRAP: CERCLIS No Further Remedial Action Planned Archived sites are sites that have been removed and archived from the inventory of CERCLIS sites. Archived status indicates that, to the best of EPA’s knowledge, assessment at a site has been completed and that EPA has determined no further steps will be taken to list this site on the National Priorities List (NPL), unless information indicates this decision was not appropriate or other considerations require a recommendation for listing at a later time. This decision does not necessarily mean that there is no hazard associated with a given site; it only means that, based upon available information, the location is not judged to be a potential NPL site. Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 94 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-412-9810 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list CORRACTS: Corrective Action Report CORRACTS identifies hazardous waste handlers with RCRA corrective action activity. TC4340409.2s Page GR-2 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: EPA Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list RCRA-TSDF: RCRA - Treatment, Storage and Disposal RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Transporters are individuals or entities that move hazardous waste from the generator offsite to a facility that can recycle, treat, store, or dispose of the waste. TSDFs treat, store, or dispose of the waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Federal RCRA generators list RCRA-LQG: RCRA - Large Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Large quantity generators (LQGs) generate over 1,000 kilograms (kg) of hazardous waste, or over 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-SQG: RCRA - Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Small quantity generators (SQGs) generate between 100 kg and 1,000 kg of hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RCRA-CESQG: RCRA - Conditionally Exempt Small Quantity Generators RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Conditionally exempt small quantity generators (CESQGs) generate less than 100 kg of hazardous waste, or less than 1 kg of acutely hazardous waste per month. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-3 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries US ENG CONTROLS: Engineering Controls Sites List A listing of sites with engineering controls in place. Engineering controls include various forms of caps, building foundations, liners, and treatment methods to create pathway elimination for regulated substances to enter environmental media or effect human health. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US INST CONTROL: Sites with Institutional Controls A listing of sites with institutional controls in place. Institutional controls include administrative measures, such as groundwater use restrictions, construction restrictions, property use restrictions, and post remediation care requirements intended to prevent exposure to contaminants remaining on site. Deed restrictions are generally required as part of the institutional controls. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-0695 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUCIS: Land Use Control Information System LUCIS contains records of land use control information pertaining to the former Navy Base Realignment and Closure properties. Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of the Navy Telephone: 843-820-7326 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Federal ERNS list ERNS: Emergency Response Notification System Emergency Response Notification System. ERNS records and stores information on reported releases of oil and hazardous substances. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: National Response Center, United States Coast Guard Telephone: 202-267-2180 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually State- and tribal - equivalent NPL RESPONSE: State Response Sites Identifies confirmed release sites where DTSC is involved in remediation, either in a lead or oversight capacity. These confirmed release sites are generally high-priority and high potential risk. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS TC4340409.2s Page GR-4 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ENVIROSTOR: EnviroStor Database The Department of Toxic Substances Control’s (DTSC’s) Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program’s (SMBRP’s) EnviroStor database identifes sites that have known contamination or sites for which there may be reasons to investigate further. The database includes the following site types: Federal Superfund sites (National Priorities List (NPL)); State Response, including Military Facilities and State Superfund; Voluntary Cleanup; and School sites. EnviroStor provides similar information to the information that was available in CalSites, and provides additional site information, including, but not limited to, identification of formerly-contaminated properties that have been released for reuse, properties where environmental deed restrictions have been recorded to prevent inappropriate land uses, and risk characterization information that is used to assess potential impacts to public health and the environment at contaminated sites. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists SWF/LF (SWIS): Solid Waste Information System Active, Closed and Inactive Landfills. SWF/LF records typically contain an inve ntory of solid waste disposal facilities or landfills. These may be active or i nactive facilities or open dumps that failed to meet RCRA Section 4004 criteria for solid waste landfills or disposal sites. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: 916-341-6320 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal leaking storage tank lists LUST REG 9: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Report Orange, Riverside, San Diego counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 03/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2001 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-637-5595 Last EDR Contact: 09/26/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/09/2012 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8). For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 02/14/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/15/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/28/2005 Number of Days to Update: 41 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 909-782-4496 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies LUST REG 6V: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Inyo, Kern, Los Angeles, Mono, San Bernardino counties. Date of Government Version: 06/07/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Victorville Branch Office (6) Telephone: 760-241-7365 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4340409.2s Page GR-5 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING LUST REG 7: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Imperial, Riverside, San Diego, Santa Barbara counties. Date of Government Version: 02/26/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2004 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Colorado River Basin Region (7) Telephone: 760-776-8943 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 6L: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Case Listing For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/09/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2003 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Lahontan Region (6) Telephone: 530-542-5572 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 5: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Alpine, Amador, Butte, Colusa, Contra Costa, Calveras, El Dorado, Fresno, Glenn, Kern, Kings, Lake, Lassen, Madera, Mariposa, Merced, Modoc, Napa, Nevada, Placer, Plumas, Sacramento, San Joaquin, Shasta, Solano, Stanislaus, Sutter, Tehama, Tulare, Tuolumne, Yolo, Yuba counties. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-4834 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 4: Underground Storage Tank Leak List Los Angeles, Ventura counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6710 Last EDR Contact: 09/06/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/19/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 3: Leaking Underground Storage Tank Database Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Monterey, San Benito, San Luis Obispo, Santa Barbara, Santa Cruz counties. Date of Government Version: 05/19/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2003 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-542-4786 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST REG 2: Fuel Leak List Leaking Underground Storage Tank locations. Alameda, Contra Costa, Marin, Napa, San Francisco, San Mateo, Santa Clara, Solano, Sonoma counties. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-622-2433 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly LUST REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigation Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, Modoc, Siskiyou, Sonoma, Trinity counties. For more current information, please refer to the State Water Resources Control Board’s LUST database. TC4340409.2s Page GR-6 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/28/2001 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/29/2001 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board North Coast (1) Telephone: 707-570-3769 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LUST: Geotracker’s Leaking Underground Fuel Tank Report Leaking Underground Storage Tank Incident Reports. LUST records contain an inventory of reported leaking underground storage tank incidents. Not all states maintain these records, and the information stored varies by state. For more information on a particular leaking underground storage tank sites, please contact the appropriate regulatory agency. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: see region list Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC: Statewide SLIC Cases The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 1: Active Toxic Site Investigations The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2003 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/07/2003 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/25/2003 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, North Coast Region (1) Telephone: 707-576-2220 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 2: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/20/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2004 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board San Francisco Bay Region (2) Telephone: 510-286-0457 Last EDR Contact: 09/19/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 01/02/2012 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SLIC REG 3: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/18/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2006 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Coast Region (3) Telephone: 805-549-3147 Last EDR Contact: 07/18/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/31/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 4: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. TC4340409.2s Page GR-7 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/17/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/18/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 47 Source: Region Water Quality Control Board Los Angeles Region (4) Telephone: 213-576-6600 Last EDR Contact: 07/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/17/2011 Data Release Frequency: Varies SLIC REG 5: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/05/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board Central Valley Region (5) Telephone: 916-464-3291 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6V: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 05/24/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/25/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/16/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Regional Water Quality Control Board, Victorville Branch Telephone: 619-241-6583 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 6L: SLIC Sites The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 09/07/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/07/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/12/2004 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board, Lahontan Region Telephone: 530-542-5574 Last EDR Contact: 08/15/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/28/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 7: SLIC List The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2004 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/29/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/04/2005 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: California Regional Quality Control Board, Colorado River Basin Region Telephone: 760-346-7491 Last EDR Contact: 08/01/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/14/2011 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SLIC REG 8: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. Date of Government Version: 04/03/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/03/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/14/2008 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: California Region Water Quality Control Board Santa Ana Region (8) Telephone: 951-782-3298 Last EDR Contact: 09/12/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 12/26/2011 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SLIC REG 9: Spills, Leaks, Investigation & Cleanup Cost Recovery Listing The SLIC (Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup) program is designed to protect and restore water quality from spills, leaks, and similar discharges. TC4340409.2s Page GR-8 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 09/10/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/28/2007 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: California Regional Water Quality Control Board San Diego Region (9) Telephone: 858-467-2980 Last EDR Contact: 08/08/2011 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 11/21/2011 Data Release Frequency: Annually INDIAN LUST R5: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land Leaking underground storage tanks located on Indian Land in Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: EPA, Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-7439 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R1: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land A listing of leaking underground storage tank locations on Indian Land. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: EPA Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R4: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Florida, Mississippi and North Carolina. Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-8677 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN LUST R6: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in New Mexico and Oklahoma. Date of Government Version: 03/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-6597 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R7: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Iowa, Kansas, and Nebraska Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN LUST R8: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6271 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4340409.2s Page GR-9 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN LUST R9: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Arizona, California, New Mexico and Nevada Date of Government Version: 01/08/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 32 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 415-972-3372 Last EDR Contact: 01/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN LUST R10: Leaking Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land LUSTs on Indian land in Alaska, Idaho, Oregon and Washington. Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly State and tribal registered storage tank lists UST: Active UST Facilities Active UST facilities gathered from the local regulatory agencies Date of Government Version: 03/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: SWRCB Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AST: Aboveground Petroleum Storage Tank Facilities A listing of aboveground storage tank petroleum storage tank locations. Date of Government Version: 08/01/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-327-5092 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R8: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 8 (Colorado, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah, Wyoming and 27 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 48 Source: EPA Region 8 Telephone: 303-312-6137 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R1: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 1 (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Rhode Island, Vermont and ten Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 02/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 53 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1313 Last EDR Contact: 04/28/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-10 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING INDIAN UST R4: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 4 (Alabama, Florida, Georgia, Kentucky, Mississippi, North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee and Tribal Nations) Date of Government Version: 09/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: EPA Region 4 Telephone: 404-562-9424 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually INDIAN UST R5: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 5 (Michigan, Minnesota and Wisconsin and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA Region 5 Telephone: 312-886-6136 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R10: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 10 (Alaska, Idaho, Oregon, Washington, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 05/06/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: EPA Region 10 Telephone: 206-553-2857 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R9: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 9 (Arizona, California, Hawaii, Nevada, the Pacific Islands, and Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 12/14/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3368 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN UST R7: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 7 (Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Nebraska, and 9 Tribal Nations). Date of Government Version: 09/23/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 65 Source: EPA Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7003 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN UST R6: Underground Storage Tanks on Indian Land The Indian Underground Storage Tank (UST) database provides information about underground storage tanks on Indian land in EPA Region 6 (Louisiana, Arkansas, Oklahoma, New Mexico, Texas and 65 Tribes). Date of Government Version: 03/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/22/2015 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA Region 6 Telephone: 214-665-7591 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/11/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TC4340409.2s Page GR-11 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING FEMA UST: Underground Storage Tank Listing A listing of all FEMA owned underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 01/01/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/16/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/12/2010 Number of Days to Update: 55 Source: FEMA Telephone: 202-646-5797 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites VCP: Voluntary Cleanup Program Properties Contains low threat level properties with either confirmed or unconfirmed releases and the project proponents have request that DTSC oversee investigation and/or cleanup activities and have agreed to provide coverage for DTSC’s costs. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly INDIAN VCP R1: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Listing A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 1. Date of Government Version: 09/29/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/01/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/06/2014 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: EPA, Region 1 Telephone: 617-918-1102 Last EDR Contact: 04/02/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN VCP R7: Voluntary Cleanup Priority Lisitng A listing of voluntary cleanup priority sites located on Indian Land located in Region 7. Date of Government Version: 03/20/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/22/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/19/2008 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: EPA, Region 7 Telephone: 913-551-7365 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2009 Data Release Frequency: Varies ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists US BROWNFIELDS: A Listing of Brownfields Sites Brownfields are real property, the expansion, redevelopment, or reuse of which may be complicated by the presence or potential presence of a hazardous substance, pollutant, or contaminant. Cleaning up and reinvesting in these properties takes development pressures off of undeveloped, open land, and both improves and protects the environment. Assessment, Cleanup and Redevelopment Exchange System (ACRES) stores information reported by EPA Brownfields grant recipients on brownfields properties assessed or cleaned up with grant funding as well as information on Targeted Brownfields Assessments performed by EPA Regions. A listing of ACRES Brownfield sites is obtained from Cleanups in My Community. Cleanups in My Community provides information on Brownfields properties for which information is reported back to EPA, as well as areas served by Brownfields grant programs. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 70 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-2777 Last EDR Contact: 03/24/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites TC4340409.2s Page GR-12 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ODI: Open Dump Inventory An open dump is defined as a disposal facility that does not comply with one or more of the Part 257 or Part 258 Subtitle D Criteria. Date of Government Version: 06/30/1985 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/09/2004 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/17/2004 Number of Days to Update: 39 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2004 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DEBRIS REGION 9: Torres Martinez Reservation Illegal Dump Site Locations A listing of illegal dump sites location on the Torres Martinez Indian Reservation located in eastern Riverside County and northern Imperial County, California. Date of Government Version: 01/12/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/21/2009 Number of Days to Update: 137 Source: EPA, Region 9 Telephone: 415-947-4219 Last EDR Contact: 04/23/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWRCY: Recycler Database A listing of recycling facilities in California. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HAULERS: Registered Waste Tire Haulers Listing A listing of registered waste tire haulers. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6422 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN ODI: Report on the Status of Open Dumps on Indian Lands Location of open dumps on Indian land. Date of Government Version: 12/31/1998 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/03/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/24/2008 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-8245 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies WMUDS/SWAT: Waste Management Unit Database Waste Management Unit Database System. WMUDS is used by the State Water Resources Control Board staff and the Regional Water Quality Control Boards for program tracking and inventory of waste management units. WMUDS is composed of the following databases: Facility Information, Scheduled Inspections Information, Waste Management Unit Information, SWAT Program Information, SWAT Report Summary Information, SWAT Report Summary Data, Chapter 15 (formerly Subchapter 15) Information, Chapter 15 Monitoring Parameters, TPCA Program Information, RCRA Program Information, Closure Information, and Interested Parties Information. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2000 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/10/2000 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/10/2000 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4448 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned TC4340409.2s Page GR-13 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites US CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CAL-SITES: Calsites Database The Calsites database contains potential or confirmed hazardous substance release properties. In 1996, California EPA reevaluated and significantly reduced the number of sites in the Calsites database. No longer updated by the state agency. It has been replaced by ENVIROSTOR. Date of Government Version: 08/08/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/03/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/24/2006 Number of Days to Update: 21 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 02/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 05/25/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SCH: School Property Evaluation Program This category contains proposed and existing school sites that are being evaluated by DTSC for possible hazardous materials contamination. In some cases, these properties may be listed in the CalSites category depending on the level of threat to public health and safety or the environment they pose. Date of Government Version: 05/04/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/05/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/14/2015 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TOXIC PITS: Toxic Pits Cleanup Act Sites Toxic PITS Cleanup Act Sites. TOXIC PITS identifies sites suspected of containing hazardous substances where cleanup has not yet been completed. Date of Government Version: 07/01/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/30/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/26/1995 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-227-4364 Last EDR Contact: 01/26/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CDL: Clandestine Drug Labs A listing of drug lab locations. Listing of a location in this database does not indicate that any illegal drug lab materials were or were not present there, and does not constitute a determination that the location either requires or does not require additional cleanup work. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-6504 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-14 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING US HIST CDL: National Clandestine Laboratory Register A listing of clandestine drug lab locations. The U.S. Department of Justice ("the Department") provides this web site as a public service. It contains addresses of some locations where law enforcement agencies reported they found chemicals or other items that indicated the presence of either clandestine drug laboratories or dumpsites. In most cases, the source of the entries is not the Department, and the Department has not verified the entry and does not guarantee its accuracy. Members of the public must verify the accuracy of all entries by, for example, contacting local law enforcement and local health departments. Date of Government Version: 02/25/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Drug Enforcement Administration Telephone: 202-307-1000 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks CA FID UST: Facility Inventory Database The Facility Inventory Database (FID) contains a historical listing of active and inactive underground storage tank locations from the State Water Resource Control Board. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/31/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/05/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/1995 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 12/28/1998 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UST MENDOCINO: Mendocino County UST Database A listing of underground storage tank locations in Mendocino County. Date of Government Version: 09/23/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/23/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/01/2009 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 707-463-4466 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually HIST UST: Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database The Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database is a historical listing of UST sites. Refer to local/county source for current data. Date of Government Version: 10/15/1990 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/25/1991 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/12/1991 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5851 Last EDR Contact: 07/26/2001 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SWEEPS UST: SWEEPS UST Listing Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System. This underground storage tank listing was updated and maintained by a company contacted by the SWRCB in the early 1990’s. The listing is no longer updated or maintained. The local agency is the contact for more information on a site on the SWEEPS list. Date of Government Version: 06/01/1994 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/07/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/11/2005 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2005 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Local Land Records LIENS 2: CERCLA Lien Information A Federal CERCLA (’Superfund’) lien can exist by operation of law at any site or property at which EPA has spent Superfund monies. These monies are spent to investigate and address releases and threatened releases of contamination. CERCLIS provides information as to the identity of these sites and properties. TC4340409.2s Page GR-15 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/18/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LIENS: Environmental Liens Listing A listing of property locations with environmental liens for California where DTSC is a lien holder. Date of Government Version: 03/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DEED: Deed Restriction Listing Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program Facility Sites with Deed Restrictions & Hazardous Waste Management Program Facility Sites with Deed / Land Use Restriction. The DTSC Site Mitigation and Brownfields Reuse Program (SMBRP) list includes sites cleaned up under the program’s oversight and generally does not include current or former hazardous waste facilities that required a hazardous waste facility permit. The list represents deed restrictions that are active. Some sites have multiple deed restrictions. The DTSC Hazardous Waste Management Program (HWMP) has developed a list of current or former hazardous waste facilities that have a recorded land use restriction at the local county recorder’s office. The land use restrictions on this list were required by the DTSC HWMP as a result of the presence of hazardous substances that remain on site after the facility (or part of the facility) has been closed or cleaned up. The types of land use restriction include deed notice, deed restriction, or a land use restriction that binds current and future owners. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: DTSC and SWRCB Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Records of Emergency Release Reports HMIRS: Hazardous Materials Information Reporting System Hazardous Materials Incident Report System. HMIRS contains hazardous material spill incidents reported to DOT. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: U.S. Department of Transportation Telephone: 202-366-4555 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually CHMIRS: California Hazardous Material Incident Report System California Hazardous Material Incident Reporting System. CHMIRS contains information on reported hazardous material incidents (accidental releases or spills). Date of Government Version: 04/14/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/21/2015 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Office of Emergency Services Telephone: 916-845-8400 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LDS: Land Disposal Sites Listing The Land Disposal program regulates of waste discharge to land for treatment, storage and disposal in waste management units. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: State Water Qualilty Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4340409.2s Page GR-16 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING MCS: Military Cleanup Sites Listing The State Water Resources Control Board and nine Regional Water Quality Control Boards partner with the Department of Defense (DoD) through the Defense and State Memorandum of Agreement (DSMOA) to oversee the investigation and remediation of water quality issues at military facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 866-480-1028 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SPILLS 90: SPILLS90 data from FirstSearch Spills 90 includes those spill and release records available exclusively from FirstSearch databases. Typically, they may include chemical, oil and/or hazardous substance spills recorded after 1990. Duplicate records that are already included in EDR incident and release records are not included in Spills 90. Date of Government Version: 06/06/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/03/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/22/2013 Number of Days to Update: 50 Source: FirstSearch Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 01/03/2013 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Other Ascertainable Records RCRA NonGen / NLR: RCRA - Non Generators / No Longer Regulated RCRAInfo is EPA’s comprehensive information system, providing access to data supporting the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) of 1976 and the Hazardous and Solid Waste Amendments (HSWA) of 1984. The database includes selective information on sites which generate, transport, store, treat and/or dispose of hazardous waste as defined by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA). Non-Generators do not presently generate hazardous waste. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 72 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: (415) 495-8895 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOT OPS: Incident and Accident Data Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Incident and Accident data. Date of Government Version: 07/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2012 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2012 Number of Days to Update: 42 Source: Department of Transporation, Office of Pipeline Safety Telephone: 202-366-4595 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies DOD: Department of Defense Sites This data set consists of federally owned or administered lands, administered by the Department of Defense, that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres of the United States, Puerto Rico, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/10/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 62 Source: USGS Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually FUDS: Formerly Used Defense Sites The listing includes locations of Formerly Used Defense Sites properties where the US Army Corps of Engineers is actively working or will take necessary cleanup actions. TC4340409.2s Page GR-17 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 06/06/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Telephone: 202-528-4285 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONSENT: Superfund (CERCLA) Consent Decrees Major legal settlements that establish responsibility and standards for cleanup at NPL (Superfund) sites. Released periodically by United States District Courts after settlement by parties to litigation matters. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 46 Source: Department of Justice, Consent Decree Library Telephone: Varies Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ROD: Records Of Decision Record of Decision. ROD documents mandate a permanent remedy at an NPL (Superfund) site containing technical and health information to aid in the cleanup. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/12/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/24/2014 Number of Days to Update: 74 Source: EPA Telephone: 703-416-0223 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually UMTRA: Uranium Mill Tailings Sites Uranium ore was mined by private companies for federal government use in national defense programs. When the mills shut down, large piles of the sand-like material (mill tailings) remain after uranium has been extracted from the ore. Levels of human exposure to radioactive materials from the piles are low; however, in some cases tailings were used as construction materials before the potential health hazards of the tailings were recognized. Date of Government Version: 09/14/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/07/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/01/2012 Number of Days to Update: 146 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 505-845-0011 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US MINES: Mines Master Index File Contains all mine identification numbers issued for mines active or opened since 1971. The data also includes violation information. Date of Government Version: 12/30/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Labor, Mine Safety and Health Administration Telephone: 303-231-5959 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TRIS: Toxic Chemical Release Inventory System Toxic Release Inventory System. TRIS identifies facilities which release toxic chemicals to the air, water and land in reportable quantities under SARA Title III Section 313. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/02/2015 Number of Days to Update: 110 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0250 Last EDR Contact: 01/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/08/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TSCA: Toxic Substances Control Act Toxic Substances Control Act. TSCA identifies manufacturers and importers of chemical substances included on the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory list. It includes data on the production volume of these substances by plant site. TC4340409.2s Page GR-18 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-260-5521 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Every 4 Years FTTS: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) FTTS tracks administrative cases and pesticide enforcement actions and compliance activities related to FIFRA, TSCA and EPCRA (Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know Act). To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA/Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FTTS INSP: FIFRA/ TSCA Tracking System - FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, & Rodenticide Act)/TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act) A listing of FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) inspections and enforcements. Date of Government Version: 04/09/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/16/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2009 Number of Days to Update: 25 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-1667 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST FTTS: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Administrative Case Listing A complete administrative case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2007 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HIST FTTS INSP: FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System Inspection & Enforcement Case Listing A complete inspection and enforcement case listing from the FIFRA/TSCA Tracking System (FTTS) for all ten EPA regions. The information was obtained from the National Compliance Database (NCDB). NCDB supports the implementation of FIFRA (Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act) and TSCA (Toxic Substances Control Act). Some EPA regions are now closing out records. Because of that, and the fact that some EPA regions are not providing EPA Headquarters with updated records, it was decided to create a HIST FTTS database. It included records that may not be included in the newer FTTS database updates. This database is no longer updated. Date of Government Version: 10/19/2006 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/01/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2007 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-2501 Last EDR Contact: 12/17/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 03/17/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SSTS: Section 7 Tracking Systems Section 7 of the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act, as amended (92 Stat. 829) requires all registered pesticide-producing establishments to submit a report to the Environmental Protection Agency by March 1st each year. Each establishment must report the types and amounts of pesticides, active ingredients and devices being produced, and those having been produced and sold or distributed in the past year. TC4340409.2s Page GR-19 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/31/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/10/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/25/2011 Number of Days to Update: 77 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4203 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually ICIS: Integrated Compliance Information System The Integrated Compliance Information System (ICIS) supports the information needs of the national enforcement and compliance program as well as the unique needs of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) program. Date of Government Version: 01/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 31 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-5088 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PADS: PCB Activity Database System PCB Activity Database. PADS Identifies generators, transporters, commercial storers and/or brokers and disposers of PCB’s who are required to notify the EPA of such activities. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-566-0500 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually MLTS: Material Licensing Tracking System MLTS is maintained by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission and contains a list of approximately 8,100 sites which possess or use radioactive materials and which are subject to NRC licensing requirements. To maintain currency, EDR contacts the Agency on a quarterly basis. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Telephone: 301-415-7169 Last EDR Contact: 06/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly RADINFO: Radiation Information Database The Radiation Information Database (RADINFO) contains information about facilities that are regulated by U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) regulations for radiation and radioactivity. Date of Government Version: 04/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/09/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-343-9775 Last EDR Contact: 04/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FINDS: Facility Index System/Facility Registry System Facility Index System. FINDS contains both facility information and ’pointers’ to other sources that contain more detail. EDR includes the following FINDS databases in this report: PCS (Permit Compliance System), AIRS (Aerometric Information Retrieval System), DOCKET (Enforcement Docket used to manage and track information on civil judicial enforcement cases for all environmental statutes), FURS (Federal Underground Injection Control), C-DOCKET (Criminal Docket System used to track criminal enforcement actions for all environmental statutes), FFIS (Federal Facilities Information System), STATE (State Environmental Laws and Statutes), and PADS (PCB Activity Data System). Date of Government Version: 01/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/27/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 26 Source: EPA Telephone: (415) 947-8000 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly TC4340409.2s Page GR-20 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING RAATS: RCRA Administrative Action Tracking System RCRA Administration Action Tracking System. RAATS contains records based on enforcement actions issued under RCRA pertaining to major violators and includes administrative and civil actions brought by the EPA. For administration actions after September 30, 1995, data entry in the RAATS database was discontinued. EPA will retain a copy of the database for historical records. It was necessary to terminate RAATS because a decrease in agency resources made it impossible to continue to update the information contained in the database. Date of Government Version: 04/17/1995 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/03/1995 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/07/1995 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-4104 Last EDR Contact: 06/02/2008 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/01/2008 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned RMP: Risk Management Plans When Congress passed the Clean Air Act Amendments of 1990, it required EPA to publish regulations and guidance for chemical accident prevention at facilities using extremely hazardous substances. The Risk Management Program Rule (RMP Rule) was written to implement Section 112(r) of these amendments. The rule, which built upon existing industry codes and standards, requires companies of all sizes that use certain flammable and toxic substances to develop a Risk Management Program, which includes a(n): Hazard assessment that details the potential effects of an accidental release, an accident history of the last five years, and an evaluation of worst-case and alternative accidental releases; Prevention program that includes safety precautions and maintenance, monitoring, and employee training measures; and Emergency response program that spells out emergency health care, employee training measures and procedures for informing the public and response agencies (e.g the fire department) should an accident occur. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-564-8600 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BRS: Biennial Reporting System The Biennial Reporting System is a national system administered by the EPA that collects data on the generation and management of hazardous waste. BRS captures detailed data from two groups: Large Quantity Generators (LQG) and Treatment, Storage, and Disposal Facilities. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/26/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/19/2013 Number of Days to Update: 52 Source: EPA/NTIS Telephone: 800-424-9346 Last EDR Contact: 05/29/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Biennially CA BOND EXP. PLAN: Bond Expenditure Plan Department of Health Services developed a site-specific expenditure plan as the basis for an appropriation of Hazardous Substance Cleanup Bond Act funds. It is not updated. Date of Government Version: 01/01/1989 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/27/1994 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/02/1994 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-255-2118 Last EDR Contact: 05/31/1994 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned UIC: UIC Listing A listing of wells identified as underground injection wells, in the California Oil and Gas Wells database. Date of Government Version: 11/19/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Deaprtment of Conservation Telephone: 916-445-2408 Last EDR Contact: 06/19/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-21 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NPDES: NPDES Permits Listing A listing of NPDES permits, including stormwater. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly CORTESE: "Cortese" Hazardous Waste & Substances Sites List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board (LUST), the Integrated Waste Board (SWF/LS), and the Department of Toxic Substances Control (Cal-Sites). Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: CAL EPA/Office of Emergency Information Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 03/31/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/13/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HIST CORTESE: Hazardous Waste & Substance Site List The sites for the list are designated by the State Water Resource Control Board [LUST], the Integrated Waste Board [SWF/LS], and the Department of Toxic Substances Control [CALSITES]. This listing is no longer updated by the state agency. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/22/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 01/22/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NOTIFY 65: Proposition 65 Records Listings of all Proposition 65 incidents reported to counties by the State Water Resources Control Board and the Regional Water Quality Control Board. This database is no longer updated by the reporting agency. Date of Government Version: 10/21/1993 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/01/1993 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/1993 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-445-3846 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned DRYCLEANERS: Cleaner Facilities A list of drycleaner related facilities that have EPA ID numbers. These are facilities with certain SIC codes: power laundries, family and commercial; garment pressing and cleaner’s agents; linen supply; coin-operated laundries and cleaning; drycleaning plants, except rugs; carpet and upholster cleaning; industrial launderers; laundry and garment services. Date of Government Version: 02/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/12/2015 Number of Days to Update: 20 Source: Department of Toxic Substance Control Telephone: 916-327-4498 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually WIP: Well Investigation Program Case List Well Investigation Program case in the San Gabriel and San Fernando Valley area. Date of Government Version: 07/03/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/03/2009 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Los Angeles Water Quality Control Board Telephone: 213-576-6726 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-22 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING ENF: Enforcement Action Listing A listing of Water Board Enforcement Actions. Formal is everything except Oral/Verbal Communication, Notice of Violation, Expedited Payment Letter, and Staff Enforcement Letter. Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: State Water Resoruces Control Board Telephone: 916-445-9379 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HAZNET: Facility and Manifest Data Facility and Manifest Data. The data is extracted from the copies of hazardous waste manifests received each year by the DTSC. The annual volume of manifests is typically 700,000 - 1,000,000 annually, representing approximately 350,000 - 500,000 shipments. Data are from the manifests submitted without correction, and therefore many contain some invalid values for data elements such as generator ID, TSD ID, waste category, and disposal method. This database begins with calendar year 1993. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/19/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: California Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 916-255-1136 Last EDR Contact: 04/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually EMI: Emissions Inventory Data Toxics and criteria pollutant emissions data collected by the ARB and local air pollution agencies. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/25/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/28/2014 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: California Air Resources Board Telephone: 916-322-2990 Last EDR Contact: 03/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/06/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INDIAN RESERV: Indian Reservations This map layer portrays Indian administered lands of the United States that have any area equal to or greater than 640 acres. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/08/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 34 Source: USGS Telephone: 202-208-3710 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SCRD DRYCLEANERS: State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners Listing The State Coalition for Remediation of Drycleaners was established in 1998, with support from the U.S. EPA Office of Superfund Remediation and Technology Innovation. It is comprised of representatives of states with established drycleaner remediation programs. Currently the member states are Alabama, Connecticut, Florida, Illinois, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, North Carolina, Oregon, South Carolina, Tennessee, Texas, and Wisconsin. Date of Government Version: 03/07/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/02/2011 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 615-532-8599 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LEAD SMELTER 1: Lead Smelter Sites A listing of former lead smelter site locations. Date of Government Version: 11/25/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/26/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 64 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-603-8787 Last EDR Contact: 04/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-23 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EPA WATCH LIST: EPA WATCH LIST EPA maintains a "Watch List" to facilitate dialogue between EPA, state and local environmental agencies on enforcement matters relating to facilities with alleged violations identified as either significant or high priority. Being on the Watch List does not mean that the facility has actually violated the law only that an investigation by EPA or a state or local environmental agency has led those organizations to allege that an unproven violation has in fact occurred. Being on the Watch List does not represent a higher level of concern regarding the alleged violations that were detected, but instead indicates cases requiring additional dialogue between EPA, state and local agencies - primarily because of the length of time the alleged violation has gone unaddressed or unresolved. Date of Government Version: 08/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 88 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 617-520-3000 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWP: EnviroStor Permitted Facilities Listing Detailed information on permitted hazardous waste facilities and corrective action ("cleanups") tracked in EnviroStor. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-323-3400 Last EDR Contact: 05/28/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly HWT: Registered Hazardous Waste Transporter Database A listing of hazardous waste transporters. In California, unless specifically exempted, it is unlawful for any person to transport hazardous wastes unless the person holds a valid registration issued by DTSC. A hazardous waste transporter registration is valid for one year and is assigned a unique registration number. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-440-7145 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COAL ASH DOE: Steam-Electric Plant Operation Data A listing of power plants that store ash in surface ponds. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/07/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/22/2009 Number of Days to Update: 76 Source: Department of Energy Telephone: 202-586-8719 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies MWMP: Medical Waste Management Program Listing The Medical Waste Management Program (MWMP) ensures the proper handling and disposal of medical waste by permitting and inspecting medical waste Offsite Treatment Facilities (PDF) and Transfer Stations (PDF) throughout the state. MWMP also oversees all Medical Waste Transporters. Date of Government Version: 01/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-558-1784 Last EDR Contact: 06/09/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies COAL ASH EPA: Coal Combustion Residues Surface Impoundments List A listing of coal combustion residues surface impoundments with high hazard potential ratings. Date of Government Version: 07/01/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/10/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-24 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING PRP: Potentially Responsible Parties A listing of verified Potentially Responsible Parties Date of Government Version: 10/25/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/17/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/20/2014 Number of Days to Update: 3 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-6023 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PROC: Certified Processors Database A listing of certified processors. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-3836 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PCB TRANSFORMER: PCB Transformer Registration Database The database of PCB transformer registrations that includes all PCB registration submittals. Date of Government Version: 02/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/19/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/10/2012 Number of Days to Update: 83 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-0517 Last EDR Contact: 05/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 1: Financial Assurance Information Listing Financial Assurance information Date of Government Version: 04/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Department of Toxic Substances Control Telephone: 916-255-3628 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Financial Assurance 2: Financial Assurance Information Listing A listing of financial assurance information for solid waste facilities. Financial assurance is intended to ensure that resources are available to pay for the cost of closure, post-closure care, and corrective measures if the owner or operator of a regulated facility is unable or unwilling to pay. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: California Integrated Waste Management Board Telephone: 916-341-6066 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies US FIN ASSUR: Financial Assurance Information All owners and operators of facilities that treat, store, or dispose of hazardous waste are required to provide proof that they will have sufficient funds to pay for the clean up, closure, and post-closure care of their facilities. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/25/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 202-566-1917 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly US AIRS MINOR: Air Facility System Data A listing of minor source facilities. TC4340409.2s Page GR-25 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/22/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually US AIRS (AFS): Aerometric Information Retrieval System Facility Subsystem (AFS) The database is a sub-system of Aerometric Information Retrieval System (AIRS). AFS contains compliance data on air pollution point sources regulated by the U.S. EPA and/or state and local air regulatory agencies. This information comes from source reports by various stationary sources of air pollution, such as electric power plants, steel mills, factories, and universities, and provides information about the air pollutants they produce. Action, air program, air program pollutant, and general level plant data. It is used to track emissions and compliance data from industrial plants. Date of Government Version: 10/16/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/31/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 11/17/2014 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: EPA Telephone: 202-564-2496 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually WDS: Waste Discharge System Sites which have been issued waste discharge requirements. Date of Government Version: 06/19/2007 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/20/2007 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/29/2007 Number of Days to Update: 9 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: 916-341-5227 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly FEDLAND: Federal and Indian Lands Federally and Indian administrated lands of the United States. Lands included are administrated by: Army Corps of Engineers, Bureau of Reclamation, National Wild and Scenic River, National Wildlife Refuge, Public Domain Land, Wilderness, Wilderness Study Area, Wildlife Management Area, Bureau of Indian Affairs, Bureau of Land Management, Department of Justice, Forest Service, Fish and Wildlife Service, National Park Service. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/06/2006 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/11/2007 Number of Days to Update: 339 Source: U.S. Geological Survey Telephone: 888-275-8747 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: N/A LEAD SMELTER 2: Lead Smelter Sites A list of several hundred sites in the U.S. where secondary lead smelting was done from 1931and 1964. These sites may pose a threat to public health through ingestion or inhalation of contaminated soil or dust Date of Government Version: 04/05/2001 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/27/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/02/2010 Number of Days to Update: 36 Source: American Journal of Public Health Telephone: 703-305-6451 Last EDR Contact: 12/02/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned 2020 COR ACTION: 2020 Corrective Action Program List The EPA has set ambitious goals for the RCRA Corrective Action program by creating the 2020 Corrective Action Universe. This RCRA cleanup baseline includes facilities expected to need corrective action. The 2020 universe contains a wide variety of sites. Some properties are heavily contaminated while others were contaminated but have since been cleaned up. Still others have not been fully investigated yet, and may require little or no remediation. Inclusion in the 2020 Universe does not necessarily imply failure on the part of a facility to meet its RCRA obligations. Date of Government Version: 04/22/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/09/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Protection Agency Telephone: 703-308-4044 Last EDR Contact: 05/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies TC4340409.2s Page GR-26 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR MGP: EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plants The EDR Proprietary Manufactured Gas Plant Database includes records of coal gas plants (manufactured gas plants) compiled by EDR’s researchers. Manufactured gas sites were used in the United States from the 1800’s to 1950’s to produce a gas that could be distributed and used as fuel. These plants used whale oil, rosin, coal, or a mixture of coal, oil, and water that also produced a significant amount of waste. Many of the byproducts of the gas production, such as coal tar (oily waste containing volatile and non-volatile chemicals), sludges, oils and other compounds are potentially hazardous to human health and the environment. The byproduct from this process was frequently disposed of directly at the plant site and can remain or spread slowly, serving as a continuous source of soil and groundwater contamination. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned EDR US Hist Auto Stat: EDR Exclusive Historic Gas Stations EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential gas station/filling station/service station sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include gas station/filling station/service station establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to gas, gas station, gasoline station, filling station, auto, automobile repair, auto service station, service station, etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR US Hist Cleaners: EDR Exclusive Historic Dry Cleaners EDR has searched selected national collections of business directories and has collected listings of potential dry cleaner sites that were available to EDR researchers. EDR’s review was limited to those categories of sources that might, in EDR’s opinion, include dry cleaning establishments. The categories reviewed included, but were not limited to dry cleaners, cleaners, laundry, laundromat, cleaning/laundry, wash & dry etc. This database falls within a category of information EDR classifies as "High Risk Historical Records", or HRHR. EDR’s HRHR effort presents unique and sometimes proprietary data about past sites and operations that typically create environmental concerns, but may not show up in current government records searches. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: N/A Date Made Active in Reports: N/A Number of Days to Update: N/A Source: EDR, Inc. Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: N/A Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives RGA LF: Recovered Government Archive Solid Waste Facilities List The EDR Recovered Government Archive Landfill database provides a list of landfills derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery in California. TC4340409.2s Page GR-27 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 196 Source: Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies RGA LUST: Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank The EDR Recovered Government Archive Leaking Underground Storage Tank database provides a list of LUST incidents derived from historical databases and includes many records that no longer appear in current government lists. Compiled from Records formerly available from the State Water Resources Control Board in California. Date of Government Version: N/A Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/01/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/30/2013 Number of Days to Update: 182 Source: State Water Resources Control Board Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2012 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: N/A Data Release Frequency: Varies COUNTY RECORDS ALAMEDA COUNTY: Contaminated Sites A listing of contaminated sites overseen by the Toxic Release Program (oil and groundwater contamination from chemical releases and spills) and the Leaking Underground Storage Tank Program (soil and ground water contamination from leaking petroleum USTs). Date of Government Version: 01/21/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually Underground Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Alameda county. Date of Government Version: 01/21/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Alameda County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 510-567-6700 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually AMADOR COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/24/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/31/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: Amador County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-223-6439 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies BUTTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa facility list. TC4340409.2s Page GR-28 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 11/20/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/24/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 44 Source: Public Health Department Telephone: 530-538-7149 Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned CALVERAS COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing Cupa Facility Listing Date of Government Version: 04/17/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/21/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: Calveras County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-754-6399 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly COLUSA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 06/11/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/13/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/07/2014 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Health & Human Services Telephone: 530-458-0396 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies CONTRA COSTA COUNTY: Site List List includes sites from the underground tank, hazardous waste generator and business plan/2185 programs. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Contra Costa Health Services Department Telephone: 925-646-2286 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually DEL NORTE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 05/19/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Del Norte County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 707-465-0426 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies EL DORADO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. TC4340409.2s Page GR-29 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: El Dorado County Environmental Management Department Telephone: 530-621-6623 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies FRESNO COUNTY: CUPA Resources List Certified Unified Program Agency. CUPA’s are responsible for implementing a unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste management regulatory program. The agency provides oversight of businesses that deal with hazardous materials, operate underground storage tanks or aboveground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Dept. of Community Health Telephone: 559-445-3271 Last EDR Contact: 04/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually HUMBOLDT COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 03/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Humboldt County Environmental Health Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies IMPERIAL COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: San Diego Border Field Office Telephone: 760-339-2777 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies INYO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list. Date of Government Version: 09/10/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/11/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/14/2013 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Inyo County Environmental Health Services Telephone: 760-878-0238 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies KERN COUNTY: TC4340409.2s Page GR-30 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Underground Storage Tank Sites & Tank Listing Kern County Sites and Tanks Listing. Date of Government Version: 07/22/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/12/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/19/2014 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Kern County Environment Health Services Department Telephone: 661-862-8700 Last EDR Contact: 06/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly KINGS COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. Date of Government Version: 05/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/28/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Kings County Department of Public Health Telephone: 559-584-1411 Last EDR Contact: 05/21/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LAKE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Lake County Environmental Health Telephone: 707-263-1164 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies LOS ANGELES COUNTY: San Gabriel Valley Areas of Concern San Gabriel Valley areas where VOC contamination is at or above the MCL as designated by region 9 EPA office. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/31/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/23/2009 Number of Days to Update: 206 Source: EPA Region 9 Telephone: 415-972-3178 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned HMS: Street Number List Industrial Waste and Underground Storage Tank Sites. Date of Government Version: 11/24/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/04/2015 Number of Days to Update: 33 Source: Department of Public Works Telephone: 626-458-3517 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually List of Solid Waste Facilities Solid Waste Facilities in Los Angeles County. TC4340409.2s Page GR-31 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 04/20/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: La County Department of Public Works Telephone: 818-458-5185 Last EDR Contact: 04/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies City of Los Angeles Landfills Landfills owned and maintained by the City of Los Angeles. Date of Government Version: 03/05/2009 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2009 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/08/2009 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Engineering & Construction Division Telephone: 213-473-7869 Last EDR Contact: 04/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Site Mitigation List Industrial sites that have had some sort of spill or complaint. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 40 Source: Community Health Services Telephone: 323-890-7806 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of El Segundo Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in El Segundo city. Date of Government Version: 03/30/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: City of El Segundo Fire Department Telephone: 310-524-2236 Last EDR Contact: 03/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually City of Long Beach Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Long Beach. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 16 Source: City of Long Beach Fire Department Telephone: 562-570-2563 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually City of Torrance Underground Storage Tank Underground storage tank sites located in the city of Torrance. Date of Government Version: 04/14/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/23/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: City of Torrance Fire Department Telephone: 310-618-2973 Last EDR Contact: 04/13/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MADERA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List A listing of sites included in the county’s Certified Unified Program Agency database. California’s Secretary for Environmental Protection established the unified hazardous materials and hazardous waste regulatory program as required by chapter 6.11 of the California Health and Safety Code. The Unified Program consolidates the administration, permits, inspections, and enforcement activities. TC4340409.2s Page GR-32 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 05/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/15/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Madera County Environmental Health Telephone: 559-675-7823 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies MARIN COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Sites Currently permitted USTs in Marin County. Date of Government Version: 10/08/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 10/22/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/15/2014 Number of Days to Update: 54 Source: Public Works Department Waste Management Telephone: 415-499-6647 Last EDR Contact: 05/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually MERCED COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Merced County Environmental Health Telephone: 209-381-1094 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA Facility List Date of Government Version: 02/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 4 Source: Mono County Health Department Telephone: 760-932-5580 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies MONTEREY COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program listing from the Environmental Health Division. Date of Government Version: 03/19/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/31/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Monterey County Health Department Telephone: 831-796-1297 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies NAPA COUNTY: Sites With Reported Contamination A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. TC4340409.2s Page GR-33 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 12/05/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/06/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/07/2012 Number of Days to Update: 63 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned Closed and Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites Underground storage tank sites located in Napa county. Date of Government Version: 01/15/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 01/16/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 02/08/2008 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Napa County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-253-4269 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NEVADA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility list. Date of Government Version: 02/12/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 18 Source: Community Development Agency Telephone: 530-265-1467 Last EDR Contact: 05/04/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies ORANGE COUNTY: List of Industrial Site Cleanups Petroleum and non-petroleum spills. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually List of Underground Storage Tank Cleanups Orange County Underground Storage Tank Cleanups (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly List of Underground Storage Tank Facilities Orange County Underground Storage Tank Facilities (UST). Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/11/2015 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Health Care Agency Telephone: 714-834-3446 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly PLACER COUNTY: TC4340409.2s Page GR-34 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Master List of Facilities List includes aboveground tanks, underground tanks and cleanup sites. Date of Government Version: 03/10/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Placer County Health and Human Services Telephone: 530-745-2363 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually RIVERSIDE COUNTY: Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Riverside County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 04/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Tank List Underground storage tank sites located in Riverside county. Date of Government Version: 04/28/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/30/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 951-358-5055 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SACRAMENTO COUNTY: Toxic Site Clean-Up List List of sites where unauthorized releases of potentially hazardous materials have occurred. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Master Hazardous Materials Facility List Any business that has hazardous materials on site - hazardous material storage sites, underground storage tanks, waste generators. Date of Government Version: 02/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/08/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/16/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Sacramento County Environmental Management Telephone: 916-875-8406 Last EDR Contact: 04/08/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN BERNARDINO COUNTY: Hazardous Material Permits This listing includes underground storage tanks, medical waste handlers/generators, hazardous materials handlers, hazardous waste generators, and waste oil generators/handlers. TC4340409.2s Page GR-35 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 03/02/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/03/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: San Bernardino County Fire Department Hazardous Materials Division Telephone: 909-387-3041 Last EDR Contact: 05/12/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN DIEGO COUNTY: Hazardous Materials Management Division Database The database includes: HE58 - This report contains the business name, site address, business phone number, establishment ’H’ permit number, type of permit, and the business status. HE17 - In addition to providing the same information provided in the HE58 listing, HE17 provides inspection dates, violations received by the establishment, hazardous waste generated, the quantity, method of storage, treatment/disposal of waste and the hauler, and information on underground storage tanks. Unauthorized Release List - Includes a summary of environmental contamination cases in San Diego County (underground tank cases, non-tank cases, groundwater contamination, and soil contamination are included.) Date of Government Version: 09/23/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/24/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/17/2013 Number of Days to Update: 23 Source: Hazardous Materials Management Division Telephone: 619-338-2268 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Solid Waste Facilities San Diego County Solid Waste Facilities. Date of Government Version: 10/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 11/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 12/29/2014 Number of Days to Update: 38 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 619-338-2209 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Environmental Case Listing The listing contains all underground tank release cases and projects pertaining to properties contaminated with hazardous substances that are actively under review by the Site Assessment and Mitigation Program. Date of Government Version: 03/23/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/15/2010 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/09/2010 Number of Days to Update: 24 Source: San Diego County Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 619-338-2371 Last EDR Contact: 06/03/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY: Local Oversite Facilities A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 09/19/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/19/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 09/29/2008 Number of Days to Update: 10 Source: Department Of Public Health San Francisco County Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tank Information Underground storage tank sites located in San Francisco county. Date of Government Version: 11/29/2010 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/15/2011 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 415-252-3920 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY: TC4340409.2s Page GR-36 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING San Joaquin Co. UST A listing of underground storage tank locations in San Joaquin county. Date of Government Version: 03/24/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/25/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/31/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Environmental Health Department Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SAN LUIS OBISPO COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 15 Source: San Luis Obispo County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-781-5596 Last EDR Contact: 05/20/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SAN MATEO COUNTY: Business Inventory List includes Hazardous Materials Business Plan, hazardous waste generators, and underground storage tanks. Date of Government Version: 04/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/15/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/23/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/15/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Fuel Leak List A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in San Mateo county. Date of Government Version: 03/16/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/17/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 7 Source: San Mateo County Environmental Health Services Division Telephone: 650-363-1921 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/29/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually SANTA BARBARA COUNTY: CUPA Facility Listing CUPA Program Listing from the Environmental Health Services division. Date of Government Version: 09/08/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 09/09/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/07/2011 Number of Days to Update: 28 Source: Santa Barbara County Public Health Department Telephone: 805-686-8167 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SANTA CLARA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa facility list TC4340409.2s Page GR-37 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Date of Government Version: 02/23/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 02/25/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/03/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-1973 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies HIST LUST - Fuel Leak Site Activity Report A listing of open and closed leaking underground storage tanks. This listing is no longer updated by the county. Leaking underground storage tanks are now handled by the Department of Environmental Health. Date of Government Version: 03/29/2005 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/30/2005 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/21/2005 Number of Days to Update: 22 Source: Santa Clara Valley Water District Telephone: 408-265-2600 Last EDR Contact: 03/23/2009 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 06/22/2009 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned LOP Listing A listing of leaking underground storage tanks located in Santa Clara county. Date of Government Version: 03/03/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/05/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2014 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Department of Environmental Health Telephone: 408-918-3417 Last EDR Contact: 06/01/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/14/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Hazardous Material Facilities Hazardous material facilities, including underground storage tank sites. Date of Government Version: 05/07/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/12/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2015 Number of Days to Update: 27 Source: City of San Jose Fire Department Telephone: 408-535-7694 Last EDR Contact: 05/07/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/24/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually SANTA CRUZ COUNTY: CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing. Date of Government Version: 05/22/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/26/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/08/2015 Number of Days to Update: 13 Source: Santa Cruz County Environmental Health Telephone: 831-464-2761 Last EDR Contact: 05/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SHASTA COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa Facility List. Date of Government Version: 03/11/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/13/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Shasta County Department of Resource Management Telephone: 530-225-5789 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies SOLANO COUNTY: TC4340409.2s Page GR-38 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Leaking Underground Storage Tanks A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/24/2015 Number of Days to Update: 5 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Solano county. Date of Government Version: 03/13/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/20/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/31/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Solano County Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 707-784-6770 Last EDR Contact: 06/10/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SONOMA COUNTY: Cupa Facility List Cupa Facility list Date of Government Version: 03/31/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/10/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: County of Sonoma Fire & Emergency Services Department Telephone: 707-565-1174 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies Leaking Underground Storage Tank Sites A listing of leaking underground storage tank sites located in Sonoma county. Date of Government Version: 04/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/02/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 11 Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 707-565-6565 Last EDR Contact: 06/22/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/12/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly SUTTER COUNTY: Underground Storage Tanks Underground storage tank sites located in Sutter county. Date of Government Version: 03/09/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/10/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/18/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Sutter County Department of Agriculture Telephone: 530-822-7500 Last EDR Contact: 06/05/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/21/2015 Data Release Frequency: Semi-Annually TUOLUMNE COUNTY: CUPA Facility List Cupa facility list Date of Government Version: 05/05/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/07/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 6 Source: Divison of Environmental Health Telephone: 209-533-5633 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies VENTURA COUNTY: TC4340409.2s Page GR-39 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Business Plan, Hazardous Waste Producers, and Operating Underground Tanks The BWT list indicates by site address whether the Environmental Health Division has Business Plan (B), Waste Producer (W), and/or Underground Tank (T) information. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/22/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Ventura County Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Inventory of Illegal Abandoned and Inactive Sites Ventura County Inventory of Closed, Illegal Abandoned, and Inactive Sites. Date of Government Version: 12/01/2011 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 12/01/2011 Date Made Active in Reports: 01/19/2012 Number of Days to Update: 49 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 04/02/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/20/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Listing of Underground Tank Cleanup Sites Ventura County Underground Storage Tank Cleanup Sites (LUST). Date of Government Version: 05/29/2008 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 06/24/2008 Date Made Active in Reports: 07/31/2008 Number of Days to Update: 37 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Medical Waste Program List To protect public health and safety and the environment from potential exposure to disease causing agents, the Environmental Health Division Medical Waste Program regulates the generation, handling, storage, treatment and disposal of medical waste throughout the County. Date of Government Version: 04/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Ventura County Resource Management Agency Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 04/27/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/10/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly Underground Tank Closed Sites List Ventura County Operating Underground Storage Tank Sites (UST)/Underground Tank Closed Sites List. Date of Government Version: 02/27/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/18/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 03/26/2015 Number of Days to Update: 8 Source: Environmental Health Division Telephone: 805-654-2813 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Quarterly YOLO COUNTY: Underground Storage Tank Comprehensive Facility Report Underground storage tank sites located in Yolo county. Date of Government Version: 03/26/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/01/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/13/2015 Number of Days to Update: 12 Source: Yolo County Department of Health Telephone: 530-666-8646 Last EDR Contact: 06/17/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 10/05/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually YUBA COUNTY: TC4340409.2s Page GR-40 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING CUPA Facility List CUPA facility listing for Yuba County. Date of Government Version: 05/18/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 06/05/2015 Number of Days to Update: 17 Source: Yuba County Environmental Health Department Telephone: 530-749-7523 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Varies OTHER DATABASE(S) Depending on the geographic area covered by this report, the data provided in these specialty databases may or may not be complete. For example, the existence of wetlands information data in a specific report does not mean that all wetlands in the area covered by the report are included. Moreover, the absence of any reported wetlands information does not necessarily mean that wetlands do not exist in the area covered by the report. CT MANIFEST: Hazardous Waste Manifest Data Facility and manifest data. Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a tsd facility. Date of Government Version: 07/30/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 08/19/2013 Date Made Active in Reports: 10/03/2013 Number of Days to Update: 45 Source: Department of Energy & Environmental Protection Telephone: 860-424-3375 Last EDR Contact: 05/18/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/31/2015 Data Release Frequency: No Update Planned NJ MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2012 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 04/29/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/29/2015 Number of Days to Update: 30 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 04/14/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 07/27/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually NY MANIFEST: Facility and Manifest Data Manifest is a document that lists and tracks hazardous waste from the generator through transporters to a TSD facility. Date of Government Version: 05/01/2015 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 05/06/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 05/20/2015 Number of Days to Update: 14 Source: Department of Environmental Conservation Telephone: 518-402-8651 Last EDR Contact: 05/06/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/17/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually PA MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/21/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/25/2014 Number of Days to Update: 35 Source: Department of Environmental Protection Telephone: 717-783-8990 Last EDR Contact: 04/16/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 08/03/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually RI MANIFEST: Manifest information Hazardous waste manifest information Date of Government Version: 12/31/2013 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 07/15/2014 Date Made Active in Reports: 08/13/2014 Number of Days to Update: 29 Source: Department of Environmental Management Telephone: 401-222-2797 Last EDR Contact: 05/26/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/07/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually TC4340409.2s Page GR-41 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING WI MANIFEST: Manifest Information Hazardous waste manifest information. Date of Government Version: 12/31/2014 Date Data Arrived at EDR: 03/19/2015 Date Made Active in Reports: 04/07/2015 Number of Days to Update: 19 Source: Department of Natural Resources Telephone: N/A Last EDR Contact: 06/11/2015 Next Scheduled EDR Contact: 09/28/2015 Data Release Frequency: Annually Oil/Gas Pipelines Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: 281-546-1505 Petroleum Bundle (Crude Oil, Refined Products, Petrochemicals, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)) N = Natural Gas Bundle (Natural Gas, Gas Liquids (LPG/NGL), and Specialty Gases (Miscellaneous)). This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Electric Power Transmission Line Data Source: PennWell Corporation Telephone: 800-823-6277 This map includes information copyrighted by PennWell Corporation. This information is provided on a best effort basis and PennWell Corporation does not guarantee its accuracy nor warrant its fitness for any particular purpose. Such information has been reprinted with the permission of PennWell. Sensitive Receptors: There are individuals deemed sensitive receptors due to their fragile immune systems and special sensitivity to environmental discharges. These sensitive receptors typically include the elderly, the sick, and children. While the location of all sensitive receptors cannot be determined, EDR indicates those buildings and facilities - schools, daycares, hospitals, medical centers, and nursing homes - where individuals who are sensitive receptors are likely to be located. AHA Hospitals: Source: American Hospital Association, Inc. Telephone: 312-280-5991 The database includes a listing of hospitals based on the American Hospital Association’s annual survey of hospitals. Medical Centers: Provider of Services Listing Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services Telephone: 410-786-3000 A listing of hospitals with Medicare provider number, produced by Centers of Medicare & Medicaid Services, a federal agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Nursing Homes Source: National Institutes of Health Telephone: 301-594-6248 Information on Medicare and Medicaid certified nursing homes in the United States. Public Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on elementary and secondary public education in the United States. It is a comprehensive, annual, national statistical database of all public elementary and secondary schools and school districts, which contains data that are comparable across all states. Private Schools Source: National Center for Education Statistics Telephone: 202-502-7300 The National Center for Education Statistics’ primary database on private school locations in the United States. Daycare Centers: Licensed Facilities Source: Department of Social Services Telephone: 916-657-4041 Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. TC4340409.2s Page GR-42 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4340409.2s Page GR-43 GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING TC4340409.2s Page A-1 geologic strata.of the soil, and nearby wells. Groundwater flow velocity is generally impacted by the nature of theGroundwater flow direction may be impacted by surface topography, hydrology, hydrogeology, characteristics 2. Groundwater flow velocity. 1. Groundwater flow direction, and Assessment of the impact of contaminant migration generally has two principal investigative components: forming an opinion about the impact of potential contaminant migration.EDR’s GeoCheck Physical Setting Source Addendum is provided to assist the environmental professional in 1981Most Recent Revision:33117-G7 ORANGE, CAEast Map: 1981Most Recent Revision:33117-G8 ANAHEIM, CATarget Property Map: USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 147 ft. above sea levelElevation:3740011.0UTM Y (Meters): 417484.4UTM X (Meters): Zone 11Universal Tranverse Mercator: 117.8914 - 117˚ 53’ 29.04’’Longitude (West): 33.7988 - 33˚ 47’ 55.68’’Latitude (North): TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES ANAHEIM, CA 928051800 GENE AUTRY WAYSTADIUM PARK TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM® TC4340409.2s Page A-2 should be field verified.on a relative (not an absolute) basis. Relative elevation information between sites of close proximitySource: Topography has been determined from the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model and should be evaluated SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES El e v a t i o n ( f t ) El e v a t i o n ( f t ) TP TP 0 1/2 1 Miles✩Target Property Elevation: 147 ft. North South West East 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 3 0 1 3 5 1 3 9 1 5 2 1 4 2 1 4 3 1 4 5 1 4 7 1 4 8 1 4 9 1 5 0 1 5 2 1 5 7 1 5 7 1 5 9 1 6 0 1 6 2 1 3 4 1 3 3 1 3 5 1 3 7 1 3 9 1 4 1 1 4 3 1 4 4 1 4 6 1 4 7 1 4 7 1 4 7 1 4 9 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 5 0 1 5 4 1 5 5 1 5 8 General SSWGeneral Topographic Gradient: TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY should contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.assist the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or,Surface topography may be indicative of the direction of surficial groundwater flow. This information can be used to TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION collected on nearby properties, and regional groundwater flow information (from deep aquifers).sources of information, such as surface topographic information, hydrologic information, hydrogeologic datausing site-specific well data. If such data is not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessary to rely on otherGroundwater flow direction for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4340409.2s Page A-3 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile NNE6 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID hydrogeologically, and the depth to water table.authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, groundwater flow direction as determinedflow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted by environmental professionals to regulatoryEDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System to provide data on the general direction of groundwater AQUIFLOW® Search Radius: 1.000 Mile. * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed undera Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. Information is inferred in the CERCLIS investigation report(s) Data Quality: No information about a sole source aquifer is available Sole Source Aquifer: clay layers. upper 100 feet of the subsurface. The Talbert aquifer underlies these The site area is characterized by discontinuous clay layers within the Hydraulic Connection: approximately 100 feet. Inferred Depth to Water: S IN THE TALBERT AQUIFER. Groundwater Flow Direction: CAD982359879 Site EPA ID Number: ITASCO Site Name: 1/2 - 1 Mile NNW Location Relative to TP: 1.25 miles Search Radius: Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site-specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All of the information and opinions presented are those of the cited EPA report(s), which were completed undera Comprehensive Environmental Response Compensation and Liability Information System (CERCLIS) investigation. contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, shouldof groundwater flow direction in the immediate area. Such hydrogeologic information can be used to assist theHydrogeologic information obtained by installation of wells on a specific site can often be an indicator HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapANAHEIM NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY NWI Electronic Data CoverageNWI Quad at Target Property Not ReportedAdditional Panels in search area: 06059C - FEMA DFIRM Flood dataFlood Plain Panel at Target Property: YES - refer to the Overview Map and Detail MapORANGE, CA FEMA FLOOD ZONE FEMA Flood Electronic DataTarget Property County and bodies of water).Refer to the Physical Setting Source Map following this summary for hydrologic information (major waterways contamination exist on the target property, what downgradient sites might be impacted.the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the impact of nearby contaminated properties or, shouldSurface water can act as a hydrologic barrier to groundwater flow. Such hydrologic information can be used to assist HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4340409.2s Page A-4 For additional site information, refer to Physical Setting Source Map Findings. N1/2 - 1 Mile WNW27 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSE26 WNW1/2 - 1 Mile NE24 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile SSW19 Not Reported1/2 - 1 Mile NWE16 SW1/4 - 1/2 Mile NEF14 Not Reported1/4 - 1/2 Mile NWE13 GENERAL DIRECTIONLOCATION GROUNDWATER FLOWFROM TPMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4340409.2s Page A-5 Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994).of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - a digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. BeikmanGeologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION Stratifed SequenceCategory:CenozoicEra: QuaternarySystem: QuaternarySeries: QCode: (decoded above as Era, System & Series) at which contaminant migration may be occurring.Geologic information can be used by the environmental professional in forming an opinion about the relative speed GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY move more quickly through sandy-gravelly types of soils than silty-clayey types of soils.characteristics data collected on nearby properties and regional soil information. In general, contaminant plumesto rely on other sources of information, including geologic age identification, rock stratigraphic unit and soilusing site specific geologic and soil strata data. If such data are not reasonably ascertainable, it may be necessaryGroundwater flow velocity information for a particular site is best determined by a qualified environmental professional GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 1 2 2 2 3 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles TC4340409.2s Page A-7 Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels.Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: METZSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granular loam to fine sandy stratified sand62 inches16 inches 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Silty Sand. Sands with fines, SOILS, Sands, COARSE-GRAINED and Sand. Clayey Gravel 200), Silty, or passing No. pct. or less materials (35 Granularloamy sand16 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric Somewhat excessively drainedSoil Drainage Class: excessively drained sands and gravels.Class A - High infiltration rates. Soils are deep, well drained toHydrologic Group: loamy sandSoil Surface Texture: METZSoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 1 in a landscape. The following information is based on Soil Conservation Service SSURGO data.for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patternsSurvey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey informationThe U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Soil Conservation Service (SCS) leads the National Cooperative Soil DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4340409.2s Page A-8 Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reportedfine sandy loam27 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydricSoil Drainage Class: textures.moderately well and well drained soils with moderately coarseClass B - Moderate infiltration rates. Deep and moderately deep,Hydrologic Group: fine sandy loamSoil Surface Texture: HUENEMESoil Component Name: Soil Map ID: 3 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 1 Max: 14.11 Not reportedNot reported sandy clay loam stratified59 inches46 inches 4 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Not reportedNot reportedsilt loam46 inches40 inches 3 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 4 Max: 14 Not reportedNot reported loam to sandy clay stratified sand40 inches16 inches 2 Min: 6.6 Max: 8.4 Min: 42 Max: 141 Not reportedNot reportedloamy sand16 inches 0 inches 1 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) > 0 inchesDepth to Watertable Min: > 0 inchesDepth to Bedrock Min: HighCorrosion Potential - Uncoated Steel: Hydric Status: Not hydric ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4340409.2s Page A-9 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNW5150 A2 1/8 - 1/4 Mile WNW5149 A1 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID Note: PWS System location is not always the same as well location. No PWS System Found FEDERAL FRDS PUBLIC WATER SUPPLY SYSTEM INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1/2 - 1 Mile SEUSGS40000138179 29 1/2 - 1 Mile SWUSGS40000138205 25 1/4 - 1/2 Mile EastUSGS40000138265 D12 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SEUSGS40000138237 B4 FEDERAL USGS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID 1.000State Database Nearest PWS within 1 mileFederal FRDS PWS 1.000Federal USGS WELL SEARCH DISTANCE INFORMATION SEARCH DISTANCE (miles)DATABASE opinion about the impact of contaminant migration on nearby drinking water wells.professional in assessing sources that may impact ground water flow direction, and in forming anEDR Local/Regional Water Agency records provide water well information to assist the environmental LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS Min: 7.4 Max: 8.4 Min: 14 Max: 42 Not reportedNot reported to silt loam stratified sand59 inches27 inches 2 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturated hydraulic conductivity micro m/sec Layer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction (pH) ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® TC4340409.2s Page A-10 1/2 - 1 Mile NorthCAOG11000217855 1 STATE OIL/GAS WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION 1/2 - 1 Mile NNECADW50000003346 30 1/2 - 1 Mile SSWCADW50000003200 28 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADW50000003273 G23 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADW50000003272 G22 1/2 - 1 Mile EastCADW50000003271 G21 1/2 - 1 Mile WNWCADW50000003293 20 1/2 - 1 Mile SouthCADW50000003225 18 1/2 - 1 Mile NorthCADW50000003311 17 1/2 - 1 Mile NECADW50000003294 F15 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ESE5145 D11 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE5152 C10 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE5151 C9 1/4 - 1/2 Mile ENE5148 C8 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthCADW50000003236 7 1/4 - 1/2 Mile SouthCADW50000003241 5 1/8 - 1/4 Mile SSECADW50000003250 B3 STATE DATABASE WELL INFORMATION LOCATION FROM TPWELL IDMAP ID ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY® EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 160160 1 6 0 160 1 60 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 2 0 1 2 0 1 6 0 1 6 0 1 60 1 6 0 1 6 0 CA TC4340409.2s Page A-12 B4 SE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower USGS40000138237FED USGS CADW50000003250Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W25E001SCasgem sta:337961N1178893W001Site code: 117.8893Longitude : 33.7961Latitude : B3 SSE 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower CADW50000003250CA WELLS Not ReportedArea Served: Unknown, Small SystemConnections:Unknown, Small SystemPop Served: Not Reported Organization That Operates System: KEESEE TANK&PUMP COSystem Name: 3000817System Number: WELL 01 - DESTROYEDSource Name: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds)Precision:334800.0 1175338.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3000817001FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26C06 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: A2 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 5150CA WELLS Not ReportedArea Served: Unknown, Small SystemConnections:Unknown, Small SystemPop Served: Not Reported Organization That Operates System: TV MOTEL APARTMENTSSystem Name: 3000520System Number: WELL 01 - DESTROYEDSource Name: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds)Precision:334759.0 1175337.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3000520001FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26C05 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: A1 WNW 1/8 - 1/4 Mile Lower 5149CA WELLS Map IDDirectionDistanceElevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-13 5 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADW50000003241CA WELLS 1972-10-10 115.60 1972-10-03 114.00 1972-10-24 114.40 1972-10-17 114.60 1973-01-05 115.80 1972-10-31 114.90 1973-05-10 115.00 1973-03-05 114.50 1973-09-12 136.00 1973-07-06 123.80 1974-01-24 115.30 1973-11-02 120.30 1974-04-21 116.40 1974-03-19 114.50 1974-08-30 113.60 1974-07-03 114.00 1975-01-02 116.60 1974-10-22 115.40 1975-04-30 121.50 1975-03-19 117.90 1975-11-06 126.50 1975-07-02 132.00 1976-05-04 121.20 1976-03-08 123.00 1976-12-28 122.70 1976-10-29 126.80 1978-09-26 104.58 1977-10-28 132.50 1979-02-07 99.55 1978-11-03 103.05 1979-08-06 98.73 1979-05-02 93.80 1980-02-14 97.67 1979-11-14 100.42 1981-05-07 78.66 1980-06-11 80.08 Note: The measurement was discontinued. 1982-05-17 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 37 ftWellholedepth units: 341Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 338Welldepth:19290427Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 2.5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 144.50Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.8883909Longitude: 33.7961274Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:18070201Huc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W25E001SMonloc name: USGS-334746117531501Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-14 C9 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5151CA WELLS ANAHEIMArea Served: 57397Connections:292900Pop Served: ANAHEIM, CA 92805 P.O. BOX 3222 (#559) Organization That Operates System: City of AnaheimSystem Name: 3010001System Number: WELL 033Source Name: UndefinedPrecision:334800.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: Active UntreatedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010001026FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-25F01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: C8 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5148CA WELLS CADW50000003236Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W26J002SCasgem sta:337932N1178916W001Site code: 117.8916Longitude : 33.7932Latitude : 7 South 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower CADW50000003236CA WELLS Date:10/19/1994 Average Water Depth: 120 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083001205T6 NNE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 34025AQUIFLOW CADW50000003241Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W26J001SCasgem sta:337945N1178924W001Site code: 117.8924Longitude : 33.7945Latitude : ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-15 Not ReportedArea Served: Unknown, Small SystemConnections:Unknown, Small SystemPop Served: Not Reported Organization That Operates System: ANACO RANCHSystem Name: 3000849System Number: WELL 01 - DESTROYEDSource Name: 1,000 Feet (10 Seconds)Precision:334750.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKEStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3000849001FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-24F01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: D11 ESE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5145CA WELLS ORANGEArea Served: 30144Connections:116800Pop Served: ORANGE 92666 P O BOX 449 Organization That Operates System: CITY OF ORANGESystem Name: 3010027System Number: WELL 11 - DESTROYEDSource Name: UndefinedPrecision:334800.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010027011FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26J02 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: C10 ENE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 5152CA WELLS ORANGEArea Served: 30144Connections:116800Pop Served: ORANGE 92666 P O BOX 449 Organization That Operates System: CITY OF ORANGESystem Name: 3010027System Number: WELL 12 - DESTROYEDSource Name: UndefinedPrecision:334800.0 1175300.0Source Lat/Long: DestroyedWell Status:Well/GroundwaterWater Type: WELL/AMBNT/MUN/INTAKE/SUPPLYStation Type:08District Number: OrangeCounty:3010027012FRDS Number: TEEUser ID:04S/10W-26J01 SPrime Station Code: Water System Information: ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-16 F15 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003294CA WELLS Date:11/21/1994 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:75 Shallow Water Depth: 50 Groundwater Flow:SW Site ID:083001785TF14 NE 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher 65064AQUIFLOW Date:02/01/1993 Average Water Depth: 100 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083001680TE13 NW 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Lower 69434AQUIFLOW 1999-04-20 85 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ftWellholedepth units: 478Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 447Welldepth:Not ReportedConstruction date: Unconfined single aquiferAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 2.5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 147Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.8839464Longitude: 33.7980718Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:Not ReportedHuc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W25F001SMonloc name: USGS-334753117525901Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: D12 East 1/4 - 1/2 Mile Higher USGS40000138265FED USGS Map IDDirectionDistanceElevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-17 20 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003293CA WELLS Date:11/22/1996 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:261 Shallow Water Depth: 64.64 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083002220T19 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 67255AQUIFLOW CADW50000003225Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W35A003SCasgem sta:337889N1178892W001Site code: 117.8892Longitude : 33.7889Latitude : 18 South 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003225CA WELLS CADW50000003311Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W23R001SCasgem sta:338069N1178895W001Site code: 117.8895Longitude : 33.8069Latitude : 17 North 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003311CA WELLS Date:10/23/1997 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:82.11 Shallow Water Depth: 76.83 Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083000719TE16 NW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 66476AQUIFLOW CADW50000003294Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W25D001SCasgem sta:338039N1178852W001Site code: 117.8852Longitude : 33.8039Latitude : ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-18 Date: 07/15/1993 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:84.77 Shallow Water Depth: 81.96 Groundwater Flow:WNW Site ID:083000236T24 NE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher 54991AQUIFLOW CADW50000003273Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: ObservationCasgem s 1:SAR-3/MP6Local well: Not ReportedCasgem sta:337995N1178787W003Site code: 117.878657Longitude : 33.799513Latitude : G23 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003273CA WELLS CADW50000003272Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: ObservationCasgem s 1:SAR-3/MP11Local well: Not ReportedCasgem sta:337995N1178787W002Site code: 117.878657Longitude : 33.799513Latitude : G22 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003272CA WELLS CADW50000003271Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: ObservationCasgem s 1:SAR-3/MP1Local well: 04S10W25G001SCasgem sta:337995N1178787W001Site code: 117.878657Longitude : 33.799513Latitude : G21 East 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003271CA WELLS CADW50000003293Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W26C001SCasgem sta:338039N1179024W001Site code: 117.9024Longitude : 33.8039Latitude : ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-19 28 SSW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower CADW50000003200CA WELLS Date:02/1997 Average Water Depth: Not Reported Deep Water Depth:79.81 Shallow Water Depth: 74.85 Groundwater Flow:N Site ID:083001732T27 WNW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 66475AQUIFLOW Date:01/29/1997 Average Water Depth: 79.8 Deep Water Depth:Not Reported Shallow Water Depth: Not Reported Groundwater Flow:Not Reported Site ID:083000274T26 SSE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower 54867AQUIFLOW 2000-08-15 75 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ftWellholedepth units: 216Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 216Welldepth:19240412Construction date: Confined single aquiferAquifer type: Quaternary AlluviumFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 2.5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 131Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Interpolated from mapHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:1Horiz Acc measure: Not ReportedSourcemap scale:-117.9020024Longitude: 33.7919607Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:Not ReportedHuc code: NAWQA DATA ENTRY COM + VER 01/08/2002 SNHAMLINMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W26N001SMonloc name: USGS-334731117540401Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 25 SW 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138205FED USGS Map IDDirectionDistanceElevation EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-20 CADW50000003346Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W24E000SCasgem sta:338127N1178877W001Site code: 117.8877Longitude : 33.8127Latitude : 30 NNE 1/2 - 1 Mile Higher CADW50000003346CA WELLS 1986 106 Date Feet below Surface Feet to Sealevel ------------------------------------------------- Ground-water levels, Number of Measurements: 1 ftWellholedepth units: 1210Wellholedepth:ftWelldepth units: 1150Welldepth:19860527Construction date: Not ReportedAquifer type: Not ReportedFormation type: California Coastal Basin aquifersAquifername: USCountrycode:NGVD29Vert coord refsys: Interpolated from topographic mapVertcollection method: feetVert accmeasure units: 5Vertacc measure val:feetVert measure units: 135Vert measure val:NAD83Horiz coord refsys: Global positioning system (GPS), uncorrectedHoriz Collection method: secondsHoriz Acc measure units:.5Horiz Acc measure: 24000Sourcemap scale:-117.881361Longitude: 33.7876944Latitude:Not ReportedContrib drainagearea units: Not ReportedContrib drainagearea:Not ReportedDrainagearea Units: Not ReportedDrainagearea value:Not ReportedHuc code: Not ReportedMonloc desc: WellMonloc type: 004S010W36C002SMonloc name: USGS-334716117525301Monloc Identifier: USGS California Water Science CenterFormal name: USGS-CAOrg. Identifier: 29 SE 1/2 - 1 Mile Lower USGS40000138179FED USGS CADW50000003200Site id:Southern Region OfficeOrg unit n: Coastal Plain Of Orange CountyBasin desc:8-1Basin cd: 30County id: UnknownCasgem s 1:Not ReportedLocal well: 04S10W35B004SCasgem sta:337854N1178952W001Site code: 117.8952Longitude : 33.7854Latitude : ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-21 CAOG11000217855Site id: PDHGissymbol:UnknownDirectiona: 30-DEC-99Completion:30-DEC-99Abandonedd: 0Redrillfoo: 0Welldeptha: 30-DEC-99Spuddate:NConfidenti: NHydraulica:NEpawell: 1Wellnumber:ThomasLeasename: Not ReportedComments: hudGissourcec: Not ReportedLocationde: Not ReportedElevation:SBBase meridian: 10WRange:04STownship: 23Section:Any AreaArea name: Any FieldFieldname:OrangeCounty name: Lindley C. MortonOperator name: PWell status:YDryhole: Not ReportedRedrill can:NBlm well: 05901072Api number:1District nun: 1 North 1/2 - 1 Mile CAOG11000217855OIL_GAS Map IDDirectionDistance EDR ID NumberDatabase ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS® TC4340409.2s Page A-22 Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedBasement Not ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedNot ReportedLiving Area - 2nd Floor 0%0%100%0.763 pCi/LLiving Area - 1st Floor % >20 pCi/L% 4-20 pCi/L% <4 pCi/LAverage ActivityArea Number of sites tested: 30 Federal Area Radon Information for ORANGE COUNTY, CA : Zone 3 indoor average level < 2 pCi/L. : Zone 2 indoor average level >= 2 pCi/L and <= 4 pCi/L. Note: Zone 1 indoor average level > 4 pCi/L. Federal EPA Radon Zone for ORANGE County: 3 12792805 ______________________ > 4 pCi/LNum TestsZipcode Radon Test Results State Database: CA Radon AREA RADON INFORMATION ®GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE MAP FINDINGS RADON ® TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model (DEM) Source: United States Geologic Survey EDR acquired the USGS 7.5’ Digital Elevation Model in 2002 and updated it in 2006. The 7.5 minute DEM corresponds to the USGS 1:24,000- and 1:25,000-scale topographic quadrangle maps. The DEM provides elevation data with consistent elevation units and projection. Scanned Digital USGS 7.5’ Topographic Map (DRG) Source: United States Geologic Survey A digital raster graphic (DRG) is a scanned image of a U.S. Geological Survey topographic map. The map images are made by scanning published paper maps on high-resolution scanners. The raster image is georeferenced and fit to the Universal Transverse Mercator (UTM) projection. HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION Flood Zone Data: This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2003 & 2011 from the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Data depicts 100-year and 500-year flood zones as defined by FEMA. NWI: National Wetlands Inventory. This data, available in select counties across the country, was obtained by EDR in 2002, 2005 and 2010 from the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION AQUIFLOW Information SystemR Source: EDR proprietary database of groundwater flow information EDR has developed the AQUIFLOW Information System (AIS) to provide data on the general direction of groundwater flow at specific points. EDR has reviewed reports submitted to regulatory authorities at select sites and has extracted the date of the report, hydrogeologically determined groundwater flow direction and depth to water table information. GEOLOGIC INFORMATION Geologic Age and Rock Stratigraphic Unit Source: P.G. Schruben, R.E. Arndt and W.J. Bawiec, Geology of the Conterminous U.S. at 1:2,500,000 Scale - A digital representation of the 1974 P.B. King and H.M. Beikman Map, USGS Digital Data Series DDS - 11 (1994). STATSGO: State Soil Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services The U.S. Department of Agriculture’s (USDA) Natural Resources Conservation Service (NRCS) leads the national Conservation Soil Survey (NCSS) and is responsible for collecting, storing, maintaining and distributing soil survey information for privately owned lands in the United States. A soil map in a soil survey is a representation of soil patterns in a landscape. Soil maps for STATSGO are compiled by generalizing more detailed (SSURGO) soil survey maps. SSURGO: Soil Survey Geographic Database Source: Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Services (NRCS) Telephone: 800-672-5559 SSURGO is the most detailed level of mapping done by the Natural Resources Conservation Services, mapping scales generally range from 1:12,000 to 1:63,360. Field mapping methods using national standards are used to construct the soil maps in the Soil Survey Geographic (SSURGO) database. SSURGO digitizing duplicates the original soil survey maps. This level of mapping is designed for use by landowners, townships and county natural resource planning and management. TC4340409.2s Page PSGR-1 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED LOCAL / REGIONAL WATER AGENCY RECORDS FEDERAL WATER WELLS PWS: Public Water Systems Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Public Water System data from the Federal Reporting Data System. A PWS is any water system which provides water to at least 25 people for at least 60 days annually. PWSs provide water from wells, rivers and other sources. PWS ENF: Public Water Systems Violation and Enforcement Data Source: EPA/Office of Drinking Water Telephone: 202-564-3750 Violation and Enforcement data for Public Water Systems from the Safe Drinking Water Information System (SDWIS) after August 1995. Prior to August 1995, the data came from the Federal Reporting Data System (FRDS). USGS Water Wells: USGS National Water Inventory System (NWIS) This database contains descriptive information on sites where the USGS collects or has collected data on surface water and/or groundwater. The groundwater data includes information on wells, springs, and other sources of groundwater. STATE RECORDS Water Well Database Source: Department of Water Resources Telephone: 916-651-9648 California Drinking Water Quality Database Source: Department of Public Health Telephone: 916-324-2319 The database includes all drinking water compliance and special studies monitoring for the state of California since 1984. It consists of over 3,200,000 individual analyses along with well and water system information. OTHER STATE DATABASE INFORMATION California Oil and Gas Well Locations Source: Department of Conservation Telephone: 916-323-1779 Oil and Gas well locations in the state. RADON State Database: CA Radon Source: Department of Health Services Telephone: 916-324-2208 Radon Database for California Area Radon Information Source: USGS Telephone: 703-356-4020 The National Radon Database has been developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) and is a compilation of the EPA/State Residential Radon Survey and the National Residential Radon Survey. The study covers the years 1986 - 1992. Where necessary data has been supplemented by information collected at private sources such as universities and research institutions. EPA Radon Zones Source: EPA Telephone: 703-356-4020 Sections 307 & 309 of IRAA directed EPA to list and identify areas of U.S. with the potential for elevated indoor radon levels. TC4340409.2s Page PSGR-2 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED OTHER Airport Landing Facilities: Private and public use landing facilities Source: Federal Aviation Administration, 800-457-6656 Epicenters: World earthquake epicenters, Richter 5 or greater Source: Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration California Earthquake Fault Lines: The fault lines displayed on EDR’s Topographic map are digitized quaternary fault lines, prepared in 1975 by the United State Geological Survey. Additional information (also from 1975) regarding activity at specific fault lines comes from California’s Preliminary Fault Activity Map prepared by the California Division of Mines and Geology. STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION © 2010 Tele Atlas North America, Inc. All rights reserved. This material is proprietary and the subject of copyright protection and other intellectual property rights owned by or licensed to Tele Atlas North America, Inc. The use of this material is subject to the terms of a license agreement. You will be held liable for any unauthorized copying or disclosure of this material. TC4340409.2s Page PSGR-3 PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE RECORDS SEARCHED APPENDIX H: RESUMES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Chemical Environmental Equipment Startups Analysis Compliance Audits Database Review Environmental Permitting Environmental Portfolio Reviews PCA/PCS Phase I ESAs Phase II LSI Biology Engineering Geology Environmental Health & Safety Environmental Permitting Hazardous Materials/Waste Remediation & Construction Management Site Characterization UST Removal Vapor Intrusion Investigations & Remediation Expertise: Highlights: Subsurface Investigation Expertise Nationwide Due Diligence Experience Manasi Chavan, EIT Assistant Project Manager [ mchavan@vertexeng.com / 949-556-4892 ] Education/Training: M.S., Environmental Engineering, University of Southern California, 2012 B.E., Chemical Engineering, University of Mumbai, India, 2010 Special Training: C & C++ MATLAB Surfer 8 AutoCAD Visual CADD Biography: Ms. Chavan has more than two years of experience in the environmental industry, including conducting several Phase I Environmental Site Assessments (ESAs) and Property Condition Assessments (PCAs) throughout the country, Phase II subsurface assessments, asbestos inspections, radon sampling, and environmental compliance audits. Currently, Ms. Chavan serves as an Assistant Project Manager forat The VERTEX Companies, Inc. (VERTEX). She is responsible for preparation of contract documents and assisting in project management for various environmental projects. Ms. Chavan is also responsible for timely completion and strict adherence to deadlines and budgets of due diligence services (Phase I, Phase II, PCA, compliance audits, asbestos inspections). Her specific job functions include:  drafting contracts, coordinating visitation set-up, site inspection, sampling and analysis, historical research, local, state and federal municipal research, assisting in project management and oversight, and report writing. Having previously interned with the California Regional Water Quality Control Board (Los Angeles region), Ms. Chavan has insight into the functioning of a regulatory agency and has an extensive knowledge of environmental regulations. Licenses/Certifications: Engineer In Training (EIT), California, 145653 OSHA 10 Hazwoper Page 1/1Manasi Chavan, EIT Environmental Portfolio Reviews Phase I ESAs Phase II LSI Litigation Support & Expert Testimony (Insurance Support) Third-Party Impact Investigation Groundwater & Soil Characterization Litigation Support & Expert Testimony (Environmental) Site Characterization Vapor Intrusion Investigations & Remediation Expertise: Mark Jirgal, PG Senior Project Manager [ mjirgal@vertexeng.com ] Education/Training: B.S., Geology, University of Maryland B.S., Resource Development, University of Maryland Biography: Mr. Jirgal is a Senior Project Manager for VERTEX located in Irvine, California.  He has 25 years experience in the Environmental Consulting industry conducting and directing more than 500 Phase I ESAs, Phase II site investigations, and remediation projects throughout the United States.  Mr. Jirgal has performed or directed assessment activities on properties ranging in complexity from vacant land to electrical power generating facilities.  He has also provided litigation support for cases involving comingled plumes, PRP identification and remediation cost allocation for properties including commercial office, aerospace, waste oil re-refining and oil packaging facilities.   Mr. Jirgal has proven project management experience and has overseen subsurface investigations utilizing a wide variety of investiative techniques including hollow-stem auger, dual-tube percussion, mud-rotary, direct-push, cone-penetrometer and sonic drilling techniques. He has also designed and conducted indoor air and soil gas surveys. Licenses/Certifications: Professional Geologist (PG), California, 6611 10 Hour OSHA Training 40 Hour OSHA Training Page 1/1Mark Jirgal, PG Asbestos Mold Compliance Audits PCA/PCS Environmental Health & Safety Remediation & Construction Management Expertise: Highlights: Project Management Experience Nationwide Nationwide Due Diligence Experience Stephen McCarthy Vice President, Due Diligence [ smccarthy@vertexeng.com / 781-952-6000 ] Education/Training: B.A., History, Providence College, 1986 Biography: Mr. McCarthy has over 25 years of experience in Environmental Consulting. He has routinely managed several hundred environmental assessment due diligence projects per year for financial, commercial and institutional clients. These projects included Phase I and Phase II Environmental Site Assessments, asbestos surveys and abatement, mold assessments, removal of underground storage tanks and site investigations. As Vice President, Mr. McCarthy is responsible for project and staff management, document review, quality control and client management. He is responsible for sales, client interaction, proposal preparation and quality assurance of product. In addition, Mr. McCarthy is also responsible for managing the set up and timely completion of due diligence services including Phase I ESAs, planning and management of Phase II subsurface investigations and remediation projects. Specifically this work includes observation of properties and operations, historic site research, delineation of contaminated media, coordinating UST removals, oversight of excavation activities, development of remediation strategies and serving as the liaison between clients, contractors and regulatory agencies.  Licenses/Certifications: OSHA 40 Hour HAZWOPER Page 1/1Stephen McCarthy APPENDIX G Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan and Drainage Study OTH2015-00816 County of Orange/Santa Ana Region Priority Project Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Project Name: JPI – JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK 1800 E. GENE AUTRY WAY, ANAHEIM, CA 92805 TENTATIVE P.M. 2015-174 Prepared for: JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 San Diego, CA 92130 (858) 369-5682 Prepared by: KHR Associates James H. Kawamura, RCE No. 30560 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 310 Newport Beach, CA 92660 (949) 756-6440 WQMP Prepared: November 3, 2015 WQMP Revised: January 11, 2016 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park      JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Owner’s Certification   JPI WQMP Report  Page i    This Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) has been prepared for JPI by KHR Associates. The WQMP is intended to comply with the requirements of the County of Orange NPDES Stormwater Program requiring the preparation of the plan. The undersigned, while it owns the subject property, is responsible for the implementation of the provisions of this plan , including the ongoing operation and maintenance of all best management practices (BMPs), and will ensure that this plan is amended as appropriate to reflect up-to-date conditions on the site consistent with the current Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) and the intent of the non-point source NPDES Permit for Waste Discharge Requirements for the County of Orange, Orange County Flood Control District and the incorporated Cities of Orange County within the Santa Ana Region. Once the undersigned transfers its interest in the property, its successors-in-interest shall bear the aforementioned responsibility to implement and amend the WQMP. An appropriate number of approved and signed copies of this document shall be available on the subject site in perpetuity. Owner: JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC Owner Representative Rosie Cooper Title Vice President & Development Manager Address 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380, San Diego, CA 92130 Email rosie.cooper@jpi.com Telephone # (858) 369-5682 I understand my responsibility to implement the provisions of this WQMP including the ongoing operation and maintenance of the best management practices (BMPs) described herein. Owner Signature Date Project Owner’s Certification Planning Application No. Grading Permit No.   Tract/Parcel Map and Lot(s) No. Tentative P.M. 2015-174 Building Permit No.   Address of Project Site and APN 1800 E. Gene Autry  Way, Anaheim, CA  92805  083‐290‐88  Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC   Owner’s Certification  JPI WQMP Report  Page ii ATTESTATION This Water Quality Management Plan has been prepared by, and under the direction of the undersigned, a duly Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Except as noted, the undersigned attests to the technical information contained herein, and has judged to be acceptable the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data for this report, upon which findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based.   Preparer (Engineer): James H. Kawamura, P.E. Title President/CEO PE Registration # C30560 Company KHR Associates Address 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 310, Newport Beach, CA 92660 Email jkawamura@khrdesign.com Telephone # (949) 756-6440 I hereby certify that this Water Quality Management Plan is in compliance with, and meets the requirements set forth in, Order No. R8-2009-0030/NPDES No. CAS618030, of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board. Preparer Signature Date January 11, 2016 Place Stamp Here   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park      JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC   Table of Contents  JPI WQMP Report  Page iii Contents ..................................................................... Page No. Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance ................. 1 Section II Project Description ......................................................................................... 2 Section III Site Description ............................................................................................10 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) .............................................................13 Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs .......................................41 Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) .................................................................................45 Section VII Educational Materials ...................................................................................46 Attachments Attachment A . ............................................................................. Educational Materials Attachment B . .................................................................. BMP Fact Sheets/Brochures Attachment C . ............................................................................... Geotechnical Report Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section I  JPI WQMP Report  Page 1  Section I Permit(s) and Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Project Infomation Permit/Application No. (If applicable) Grading or Building Permit No. (If applicable) Address of Project Site (or Tract Map and Lot Number if no address) and APN 1800 E. Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, CA 92805 083-290-88 Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance Water Quality Conditions of Approval or Issuance applied to this project. (Please list verbatim.) Conceptual WQMP Was a Conceptual Water Quality Management Plan previously approved for this project? This is the Conceptual WQMP. Watershed-Based Plan Conditions Provide applicable conditions from watershed - based plans including WIHMPs and TMDLs. A WIHMP has not been developed as of this dated report. TMDLs have not been developed as of this dated report. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 2 Section II Project Description II.1 Project Description Description of Proposed Project Development Category (From Model WQMP, Table 7.11-2; or -3): All significant redevelopment projects, where significant redevelopment is defined as the addition or replacement of 5,000 or more square feet of impervious surface on an already developed site. Redevelopment does not include routine maintenance activities that are conducted to maintain original line and grade, hydraulic capacity, original purpose of the facility, or emergency redevelopment activity required to protect public health and safety. If the redevelopment results in the addition or replacement of less than 50 percent of the impervious area on-site and the existing development was not subject to WQMP requirement, the numeric sizing criteria discussed in Section 7.II-2.0 only applies to the addition or replacement area. If the addition or replacement accounts for 50 percent or more of the impervious area, the Project WQMP requirements apply to the entire development. Project Area (ft2): 779,205 Number of Dwelling Units: 1,072 SIC Code: 8811 Project Area Pervious Impervious Area (acres or sq ft) Percentage Area (acres or sq ft) Percentage Pre-Project Conditions 0.77 0.05 17.12 0.96 Post-Project Conditions 1.39 0.05 16.50 0.92 Drainage Patterns/Connections The buildings and associated pads in the project area were previously demoed by others for development, but the surface parking area remains. The proposed project is broken up into 14 drainage areas. The northern portion of Parcel 1 (labeled P1 A) is collected within a storm drain system that discharges into the storm drain main within Gene Autry Way. The southern portion of Parcel 1 (labeled P1 B) is collected within a storm drain system that discharges into the storm drain main within Union Street. The northern portion of Parcel 2, including a portion of the private street (labeled P2 A), is collected within a storm drain system that discharges into the storm drain main within Gene Autry Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 3 Way. The southern portion of Parcel 2, including a portion of the private street (labeled P2 B), is collected within a storm drain system that discharges into the storm drain main within Union Street. Parcel A is a public park that is collected by area drains that discharge into the storm drain main within Union Street. The northern portion of Parcel 3, including a portion of the private street (labeled P3 A), is collected within a storm drain system that discharges into the storm drain main within Gene Autry Way. The southern portion of Parcel 3, including a portion of the private street (labeled P3 B), is collected within a storm drain system that discharges into the storm drain main within Union Street. Union Street (US) drains northerly and is collected by catch basins within the street that connect to the storm drain main within Gene Autry Way. Gene Autry Way adjacent Parcel 1 and Parcel 2 has two drainage areas that flow westerly where each area is collected within bioretention planters that have an overflow connected to the main in Gene Autry Way. Gene Autry Way adjacent Parcel 3 has a single drainage area that flows easterly and is collected within a bioretention planter that has an overflow connected to the main in State College Boulevard. State College Boulevard has two drainage areas that flow southerly and are each collected within a bioretention planter that discharges to a main within State College Boulevard. Artisan Court is a single drainage area that is collected by an existing Filterra unit and then catch basin that discharges to a main within State College Boulevard. Narrative Project Description: For the overall project, JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC is proposing a 1,072 unit apartment complex with approximately 10,000 square feet of commercial space on 17.57 acres. The project will include three buildings, each wrapping around a parking structure, and includes the construction of a 1.11 acre public park, a new public road, a new private road, new curbs, sidewalks, asphalt pavement, and surface parking. The project will also complete approximately 73,493 square feet of right of way improvements to Gene Autry Way, State College Boulevard, and Artisan Court. Landscaped areas are located around the perimeter of the site and within the courtyards. Landscaping will consists of drought tolerant or native species grouped with similar irrigation needs. Outdoor residential activities include the use of the pool, spa, lounge areas, barbeques, and dining areas within the courtyards. Laundry facilities are located within the residential units. Trash enclosures are enclosed within the ground level of the parking structures. Materials expected to be used/stored will be maintenance materials stored within buildings. Waste expected from the site is trash from residents along with landscape waste. Equipment and vehicle fueling, Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 4 maintenance and repair, and washing or cleaning will not be performed onsite.  II.2 Potential Stormwater Pollutants Pollutants of Concern Pollutant Highlight One: E=Expected to be of concern N=Not Expected to be of concern Additional Information and Comments Suspended-Solid/ Sediment E N Residential and Parking Nutrients E N Residential and Parking Heavy Metals E N Parking Pathogens (Bacteria/Virus) E N Residential and Parking Pesticides E N Residential and Parking Oil and Grease E N Residential and Parking Toxic Organic Compounds E N Parking Trash and Debris E N Residential and Parking II.3 Hydrologic Conditions of Concern Determine if streams located downstream from the project area are potentially susceptible to hydromodification impacts. No – Show map Yes – Describe applicable hydrologic conditions of concern below. Refer to Section 2.2.3 in the Technical Guidance Document (TGD). According to the TGD’s Susceptibility Analysis Anaheim Bay – Huntington Harbor map as well as the Santa Ana River, the channels downstream of the site are stable.   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 5 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 6 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 7 II.4 Post Development Drainage Characteristics Within the project site, stormwater is collected within the private storm drain system by roof drains, area drains, or drop inlets. The proposed project is divided into 14 drainage management areas (DMA). Within each privately owned DMA, the low flows are routed to a perforated Corrugated Steel Pipe (CSP) for infiltration while the high flows bypass the treatment system and discharge off-site to the city storm drain system. Runoff from vehicular areas will pass through either Modular Wetlands units or Contech StormFilter media vaults for pretreatment prior to infiltration. Runoff within the park will be directed to infiltration basins. Runoff from the disturbed right of way areas will be directed into the parkways and infiltrated by means of bioretention planters. Drainage from Parcel 1 consists of two drainage areas with the Parcel divided between north and south. Drainage from P1 A consists of the northerly portion of Parcel 1. The on-site private storm drain main for P1 A runs along the perimeter of the northern portion of the building where it connects to a diversion system at the northwest portion of the parcel, and finally terminates to the north into the city main within Gene Autry Way. Upstream of the last on-site connection to the private main is a lateral that drains to the CSP retention system used for DMA P1 A. Drainage from P1 B consists of the southerly portion of Parcel 1. The on-site private storm drain runs along the perimeter of the building to a diverter located centrally within Parcel 1 near the easterly boundary with Union Street. From the diverter, high flows discharge easterly into the city main within Union Street. Upstream of the last on- site connection to the private main is a lateral that drains to the CSP retention system used for DMA P1 B. Drainage from Parcel 2 consists of two drainage areas divided between the north and south of the Parcel along with the westerly half width of the private street within Parcel A. Drainage from P2 A consists of the northerly portion of Parcel 2. The on-site private storm drain runs along the perimeter of the building to a diverter located near the northeasterly corner of Parcel 2 adjacent the westerly side of the private street. From the diverter, high flows discharge northerly into the city main in Gene Autry Way. Upstream of the last on-site connection to the private main is a lateral that drains to the CSP retention system used for DMA P2 A. Drainage from P2 B consists of the southerly portion of Parcel 2. The on-site private storm drain runs along the perimeter of the building to a diverter located near the southeasterly corner of Parcel 2 adjacent the westerly side of the private street. From the diverter, high flows discharge southerly into the city main in Artisan Court. Upstream of the last on-site connection to the private main is a lateral that drains to the CSP retention system used for DMA P2 B. Drainage from Parcel 3 consists of two drainage areas divided between the north and south of the Parcel along with the easterly half width of the private street within Parcel 2 and Parcel A. Drainage from P3 A consists of the northerly portion of Parcel 3. The on-site private storm drain runs along the perimeter of the building to a diverter located near the northwesterly corner of Parcel 3 adjacent the easterly side of the private street. From the diverter, high flows discharge northerly into the city main in Gene Autry Way. Upstream of the last on-site connection to the private main is a lateral that drains to the CSP retention Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 8 system used for DMA P3 A. Drainage from P3 B consists of the southerly portion of Parcel 3. The on-site private storm drain runs along the perimeter of the building to a diverter located near the southwesterly corner of Parcel 3 adjacent the easterly side of the private street. From the diverter, high flows discharge southerly into the city main in Artisan Court. Upstream of the last on-site connection to the private main is a lateral that drains to the CSP retention system used for DMA P3 B. Drainage from Parcel A consists of the entire Parcel except that easterly portion within the private road. Drainage from DMA PK will be collected within infiltration basins for treatment with the high flows being collected by a storm drain system that discharges north to the city main within Union Street. Union Street is crowned at the centerline of the street and slopes to the north. Both the west and east sides of Union Street are collected by bioretention planters within the parkway. Flows over the DCV are collected by an overflow within the bioretention planters connected to a main within the street that discharges to the main within Gene Autry Way. Drainage from the disturbed area of Gene Autry Way consists of three drainage areas adjacent Parcels 1 through 3 and divided by the Private Street and Union Street. Drainage from GA 1 is the right of way area adjacent to Parcel 1. Drainage from GA 2 is the right of way area adjacent to Parcel 2. Drainage from GA 3 is the right of way area adjacent to Parcel 3. Each drainage area will be collected by bioretention planters within the parkway. Flows over the DCV are collected by an overflow within the bioretention planters that is connected to a main within Gene Autry Way. Drainage from the disturbed area of State College Boulevard consists of two drainage areas adjacent to Parcel 3. Drainage from SC 1 is the right of way area at the corner of Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard. Drainage from SC 2 is from SC 1 until the northwest corner of Artisan Court. Each drainage area will be collected by bioretention planters within the parkway. Flows over the DCV are collected by an overflow within the bioretention planters that is connected to a main within State College Boulevard. Drainage from the disturbed area (north side) of Artisan Court consists of a single drainage area. This drainage area flows east to an existing Filterra Unit near the corner of State College Boulevard. The Filterra Unit and associated catch basin drain to an existing storm drain within State College Boulevard. The DCV from this area will be offset by the undisturbed areas that will be collected by the bioretention planters along both State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way. The catch basin adjacent the site on Artisan Court connects to the storm drain main within State College Boulevard, which commences at Artisan Court and extends south within State College Boulevard. The storm drain in Union Street flows northerly and connects to the storm drain main within Gene Autry Way. The storm drain main within Gene Autry Way drains westerly from the site and ultimately connects to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel prior to discharge into the Pacific Ocean. The main within State College Boulevard drains southerly from the site and ultimately discharges into the Santa Ana River prior to Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section II  JPI WQMP Report Page 9 discharge into the Pacific Ocean. II.5 Property Ownership/Management All portions of the project site are owned by JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC. No on-site infrastructures will be transferred to any public agency. JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC shall be responsible for the long term maintenance and funding of the project's stormwater facilities.  Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section III  JPI WQMP Report Page 10 Section III Site Description III.1 Physical Setting Name of Planned Community/Planning Area (if applicable) The Platinum Triangle Location/Address Southwest corner of Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard; 1800 E. Gene Autry Way, Anaheim, CA 92805 General Plan Land Use Designation Mixed Use and Open Space Zoning Industrial Acreage of Project Site 17.89(counting public right of way and park) Predominant Soil Type Loose to medium dense fine sands, stiff silts and silty sands III.2 Site Characteristics Site Characteristics Precipitation Zone 0.85 Topography Site topography is relatively flat with the northern portion of the site being at a higher elevation and the southeastern portion of the site being at a slightly lower elevation. Drainage Patterns/Connections Drainage from the previously developed site (prior to demolition) consisted of sheet flows that drained a portion of the site via ribbon gutters in a westerly and then northerly direction to a catch basin within the northwest corner of the property, ultimately discharging into Gene Autry Way, and sheet flows that drained the remainder of the site via ribbon gutters in an easterly direction ultimately discharging to State College Boulevard. Existing site drainage patterns consist of sheet flows that drain a portion of the site to the catch basin within the northwest corner of the property, and the remainder of the site sheet flows to curb face. The storm drain within Gene Autry Way commences adjacent the northwesterly corner of the project site and flows westerly from the site. The storm drain within State College Boulevard commences at the southeast corner of site and Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section III  JPI WQMP Report Page 11 flows southerly. The City main in Gene Autry Way ultimately connects to the East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel prior to discharging into the Pacific Ocean. The City main within State College Boulevard ultimately discharges to the Santa Ana River prior to discharging into the Pacific Ocean. Soil Type, Geology, and Infiltration Properties Soil type A Hydrogeologic (Groundwater) Conditions According to the geotechnical report by Leighton and Associates, Inc., groundwater was not encountered up to the total depth drilled of 71.5 feet. The historically high groundwater level is greater than 50-feet.  Geotechnical Conditions (relevant to infiltration) An infiltration test performed on-site indicated that the subsurface soils have an infiltration rate of 1.67 inches/hour at test hole LP-1, 3.28 inches/hour at LP-2, and 11.20 inches/hour at LP-3. The infiltration rate of 3.28 inches will be used for the calculations due to the similarity in depth to the proposed system. Off-Site Drainage The project site does not receive run-on from adjacent properties. Utility and Infrastructure Information Any remaining existing on-site subsurface utilities will be removed and disposed of.  Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section III  JPI WQMP Report Page 12 III.3 Watershed Description Receiving Waters East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel Huntington Harbor Anaheim Bay Santa Ana River Pacific Ocean 303(d) Listed Impairments East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel: Ammonia Huntington Harbor: Chlordane; Copper; Lead; Nickel; Pathogens; PCBs; Sediment Toxicity Anaheim Bay: Dieldrin; Nickel; PCBs; Sediment Toxicity Santa Ana River (Reach 1): None Applicable TMDLs None Pollutants of Concern for the Project Suspended Solids/Sediments, Nutrients, Heavy Metals, Pathogens, Pesticides, Oil & Grease, Toxic Organic Compounds, Trash & Debris Environmentally Sensitive and Special Biological Significant Areas None Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 13 Section IV Best Management Practices (BMPs) IV. 1 Project Performance Criteria (NOC Permit Area only) Is there an approved WIHMP or equivalent for the project area that includes more stringent LID feasibility criteria or if there are opportunities identified for implementing LID on regional or sub-regional basis? YES NO If yes, describe WIHMP feasibility criteria or regional/sub-regional LID opportunities. A WIHMP has not been developed for the project area at the time of this dated report. Project Performance Criteria If HCOC exists, list applicable hydromodification control performance criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.2.2 in MWQMP) A hydrologic condition of concern (HCOC) does not exist. List applicable LID performance criteria (Section 7.II-2.4.3 from MWQMP) The following performance criteria for LID implementation are stated in both permits: • Priority Projects must infiltrate, harvest and use, evapotranspire, or biotreat/biofilter, the 85th percentile, 24-hour storm event (Design Capture Volume). • A properly designed biotreatment system may only be considered if infiltration, harvest and use, and evapotranspiration (ET) cannot be feasibly implemented for the full design capture volume. In this case, infiltration, harvest and use, and ET practices must be implemented to the greatest extent feasible and biotreatment may be provided for the remaining design capture volume. The following performance criteria result in capture and retention and/or biotreatment of 80 percent of average annual stormwater runoff volume. The performance criteria for LID are stated as follows: Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 14 • LID BMPs must be designed to retain, on-site, (infiltrate, harvest and use, or evapotranspire) stormwater runoff up to 80 percent average annual capture efficiency • LID BMPs must be designed to: o Retain, on-site, (infiltrate, harvest and use, or evapotranspire) stormwater runoff as feasible up to the Design Capture Volume, and o Recover (i.e., draw down) the storage volume as soon as possible after a storm event (see criteria for maximizing drawdown rate in the TGD Appendix XI), and, if necessary o Biotreat, on-site, additional runoff, as feasible, up to 80 percent average annual capture efficiency (cumulative, retention plus biotreatment), and, if necessary o NOC Permit Area only – retain or biotreat, in a regional facility, the remaining runoff up to 80 percent average annual capture efficiency (cumulative, retention plus biotreatment, on-site plus off-site), and, if necessary o Fulfill alternative compliance obligations for runoff volume not retained or biotreated up to 80 percent average annual capture efficiency using treatment controls or other alternative approaches as described in Section 7.II-3. Subsurface infiltration is used for the entire Design Storm Capture Volume for privately owned aspects of the project (Parcels 1, 2, 3, and the Private Road). An infiltration basin will be used to infiltrate the DCV for the Public Park and bioretention planters will be used to infiltrate the DCV for the public right of way. List applicable treatment control BMP performance criteria (Section 7.II-3.2.2 from MWQMP) Surface and Subsurface infiltration are used for the entire Design Storm Capture Volume.  Calculate LID design storm capture volume for Project. See the following calculation. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 15 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 16 IV.2. Site Design and Drainage The site perimeter is surrounded by landscaping except where access is required. Walkways will drain to adjacent landscaping. When possible, landscaping will use swales to increase the contact time of the runoff. Parking is within three structures and uncovered at surface. The proposed site will drain to perforated Corrugated Steel Pipes (CSP) for treatment by means of infiltration. Runoff from vehicular areas will pass through either Modular Wetlands units or Contech StormFilter media vaults for pretreatment prior to infiltration. The public right of way areas will drain to bioretention planters for infiltration. The project site is divided into 14 drainage management areas, labeled P1 A (Parcel 1 A), P1 B (Parcel 1 B), P2 A (Parcel 2 A), P2 B (Parcel 2 B), P3 A (Parcel 3 A), P3 B (Parcel 3 B), PK (Public Park), US (Union Street), GA 1 (Gene Autry 1), GA 2 (Gene Autry 2), GA 3 (Gene Autry 3), SC 1 (State College 1), SC 2 (State College 2), and AC (Artisan Court). Drainage management area P1 A is approximately 2.58 acres of the northerly portion of Parcel 1 and drains to the CSP located near the northwesterly corner of the parcel. The DCV is 6,839 cubic feet and the CSP was sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area P1 B is approximately 2.31 acres of the southerly portion of Parcel 1 and drains to the CSP located centrally along the easterly portion of the parcel. The DCV is 6,123 cubic feet and the CSP was sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area P2 A is approximately 2.87 acres of the northerly portion of Parcel 2, including a portion of the private street, and drains to the CSP located on the northeasterly side of the parcel in the westerly portion of the private street. The DCV is 7,607 cubic feet and the CSP was sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area P2 B is approximately 1.99 acres of the southerly portion of Parcel 2, including a portion of the private street, and drains to the CSP located on the southeasterly side of the parcel in the westerly portion of the private street. The DCV is 5,275 cubic feet and the CSP was sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area P3 A is approximately 0.68 acres of the northerly portion of Parcel 3, including a portion of the private street, and drains to the CSP located on the northwesterly side of the parcel in the easterly portion of the private street. The DCV is 1,802 cubic feet and the CSP was sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area P3 B is approximately 4.08 acres of the southerly portion of Parcel 3, including a portion of the private street, and drains to the CSP located on the southwesterly side of the parcel in the easterly portion of the private street. The DCV is 10,814 cubic feet and the CSP was sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area PK is approximately 1.11 acres of Parcel A. The street portion of Parcel A is being collected within DMAs P2 B and P3 B. The DCV is 768 cubic feet and the Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 17 infiltration basin was sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area US is approximately 0.73 acres. The entire area is being collected within the bioretention planters on either side of the street. The DCV is 1,742 cubic feet and the bioretention planters were sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area GA 1 is approximately 0.34 acres. The entire area is being collected within the bioretention planters on the south street. The DCV is 848 cubic feet and the bioretention planters were sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area GA 2 is approximately 0.29 acres. The entire area is being collected within the bioretention planters on the south street. The DCV is 664 cubic feet and the bioretention planters were sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area GA 3 is approximately 0.27 acres. The entire area is being collected within the bioretention planters on the south street. The DCV is 655 cubic feet and the bioretention planters were sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area SC 1 is approximately 0.11 acres. The entire area is being collected within the bioretention planters on the west side of the street. The DCV is 295 cubic feet and the bioretention planters were sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area SC 2 is approximately 0.39 acres. The entire area is being collected within the bioretention planters on the west side of the street. The DCV is 940 cubic feet and the bioretention planters were sized to retain the entire volume. Drainage management area AC is approximately 0.29 acres. Since the entire area is already being collected by an existing Filterra unit at the east side of the street, then the DCV of 710 cubic feet will be offset by the undisturbed areas being collected by the bioretention planters within both Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 18 IV.3 LID BMP Selection and Project Conformance Analysis IV.3.1 Hydrologic Source Controls (HSCs) Name Included? Localized on-lot infiltration Impervious area dispersion (e.g. roof top disconnection) Street trees (canopy interception) Residential rain barrels (not actively managed) Green roofs/Brown roofs Blue roofs Impervious area reduction (e.g. permeable pavers, site design) Other: Infiltration will be used to mitigate stormwater pollution and reduce stormwater volume. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 19 IV.3.2 Infiltration BMPs Name Included? Bioretention without underdrains Rain gardens Porous landscaping Infiltration planters Retention swales Infiltration trenches Infiltration basins Drywells Subsurface infiltration galleries French drains Permeable asphalt Permeable concrete Permeable concrete pavers Other: See the following CSP retention tank, bioretention, and infiltration basin calculations which demonstrate that the LID DCV can be met with infiltration. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 20 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 21   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 22   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 23   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 24   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 25   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 26   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 27   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 28   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 29   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 30   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 31   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 32   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 33   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 34 IV.3.3 Evapotranspiration, Rainwater Harvesting BMPs Name Included? All HSCs; See Section IV.3.1 Surface-based infiltration BMPs Biotreatment BMPs Above-ground cisterns and basins Underground detention Other:   N/A IV.3.4 Biotreatment BMPs Name Included? Bioretention with underdrains Stormwater planter boxes with underdrains Rain gardens with underdrains Constructed wetlands Vegetated swales Vegetated filter strips Proprietary vegetated biotreatment systems Wet extended detention basin Dry extended detention basins Other:   N/A Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 35 IV.3.5 Hydromodification Control BMPs   Hydromodification Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description IV.3.6 Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs   Regional/Sub-Regional LID BMPs N/A IV.3.7 Treatment Control BMPs Treatment Control BMPs BMP Name BMP Description Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 36 IV.3.8 Non-structural Source Control BMPs   Non-Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable N1 Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants N2 Activity Restrictions N3 Common Area Landscape Management N4 BMP Maintenance N5 Title 22 CCR Compliance (How development will comply) Project does not contain hazardous substances. N6 Local Industrial Permit Compliance Project is not an industrial site. N7 Spill Contingency Plan Project does not contain hazardous substances. N8 Underground Storage Tank Compliance Project site does not have any UST’s. N9 Hazardous Materials Disclosure Compliance Project does not contain hazardous substances. N10 Uniform Fire Code Implementation Project does not contain hazardous substances. N11 Common Area Litter Control N12 Employee Training N13 Housekeeping of Loading Docks Project site does not have any loading docks. N14 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection N15 Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots N16 Retail Gasoline Outlets Project site does not include a retail gasoline outlet.   (N1) Education Educational materials for good housekeeping practices, this report, as well as other applicable stormwater BMP materials will be distributed by the owner to all employees and contractors that will perform any task affiliated with the BMPs mentioned within this report. Materials will be presented upon hire and materials review will be done annually. (N2) Activity Restrictions No outdoor storage shall be permitted. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 37 No hosing down of any paved surfaces will occur where the result would be the flow of non-stormwater into the street or storm drains. No dumping of any waste into drop inlets or catch basins. No blowing or sweeping of debris such as leaf litter, grass clippings, miscellaneous litter, etc. into catch basins, area drains, or streets. These and any other restrictions shall be adhered to daily. (N3) Common Landscape Management Maintenance shall include trimming, mowing, weeding, removal of litter, fertilizing, water conservation, and replacement of dead, diseased, or dying plants. Any plant materials shall be installed and maintained in a neat, vigorous, and healthy condition. Irrigation will be monitored to establish proper time of watering. Landscape waste will be properly disposed of. Any fertilizer or pesticides used will be done so sparingly, according to Federal, State, and County standards, and applied in accordance with the directions on the label. Landscape Management shall be performed on a monthly basis. Irrigation Management shall be done in accordance with the landscapes watering schedule. CASQA BMP SC-41 (N4) BMP Maintenance BMP maintenance refers to the proper inspection and maintenance at specified frequencies of all Routine Structural BMPs, Non-Structural BMPs, and Treatment Control BMPs mentioned within this report. Record of inspections and maintenances shall be made and kept on-site. BMP Maintenance shall be adhered to as required. See Section VI for locations of BMPs. (N11) Common Area Litter Control Routine maintenance shall consist of litter control throughout entire site, closing trash can lids, cleaning area around trash can, emptying trash containers throughout the site and inspecting and implementing the Best Management Practices. Common Area Litter Control shall be adhered to on a weekly basis. BMP FF-13 (N12) Employee Training Training will begin with a general review and explanation of stormwater/urban runoff and its effect on the environment. Applicable Federal, State, and City stormwater requirements will be discussed including stormwater discharge prohibitions, and wastewater discharge requirements. New employees/contractors are to be given a basic orientation on all aspects of pollution preventative measures, and shall begin training immediately after hire (i.e. within 30 days of the start date) and shall be required to attend meetings thereafter, as scheduled by the property owner. An annual BMP meeting, at a minimum, will be conducted on preventative measures, inspection, and maintenance. This WQMP report shall be reviewed at the meetings. Documentation of training as well as the individuals responsible for preparation, implementation, and compliance shall be kept on-site. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 38 (N14) Common Area Catch Basin Inspection Inspection shall be performed monthly and after every rain event. Catch basins shall be cleaned when sump is 40% full but at a minimum annually before the rainy season. Repair any damage to catch basins or drop inlets. CASQA BMP SC-44 (N15) Street Sweeping Private Streets and Parking Lots Surface inspection of the parking area shall be performed on a monthly basis at a minimum. The parking structure shall be swept and cleaned monthly to prevent potential debris and pollutants from entering into the storm drain system. Hosing off the parking structure surface is prohibited. CASQA BMP SC-43 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 39 IV.3.9 Structural Source Control BMPs    Structural Source Control BMPs Identifier Name Check One If not applicable, state brief reason Included Not Applicable S1 Provide storm drain system stenciling and signage S2 Design and construct outdoor material storage areas to reduce pollution introduction Any stored materials will be stored within structure. S3 Design and construct trash and waste storage areas to reduce pollution introduction S4 Use efficient irrigation systems & landscape design, water conservation, smart controllers, and source control S5 Protect slopes and channels and provide energy dissipation  Project does not have any slopes or channels. Incorporate requirements applicable to individual priority project categories (from SDRWQCB NPDES Permit)   Project is within SARWQCB NPDES Permit area and is not subject to this criterion. S6 Dock areas  Project does not have dock areas. S7 Maintenance bays  Project does not have maintenance bays.  S8 Vehicle wash areas  Project does not have wash areas.  S9 Outdoor processing areas  Project does not have outdoor processing areas.  S10 Equipment wash areas  Project does not have equipment wash areas.  S11 Fueling areas  Project does not have fueling areas.  S12 Hillside landscaping  Project does not have hillside landscaping.  S13 Wash water control for food preparation areas  Project does not have food preparation areas.  S14 Community car wash racks  Project does not have community car wash racks.    S1 Catch Basin Stenciling The on-site proposed drop inlets will use City markers that state “No Dumping – Drains to Ocean.” Inspection of drop inlet markers shall be done annually. Re-stenciling shall be done as needed, with a minimum frequency of every five years, to ensure legibility. CASQA BMP SD-13 Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section IV JPI WQMP Report Page 40 S3 Trash Storage Areas The dumpster is within an enclosed parking structure and is not subject to run-on. The trash dumpster areas will be inspected, on a weekly basis to prevent overflows of trash (i.e. excess debris from the dumpster that has fallen onto the ground) and to ensure that the trash dumpster lids are closed to prevent potential debris or pollutants from entering into any storm drain conveyance system. Trash enclosure areas shall be kept clean and dumpsters are to be replaced immediately if damaged or leaking. CASQA BMP SD-32 S4 Use Efficient Irrigation Systems and Landscaping Design Landscaping will consist of drought tolerant or native plants, grouped by similar irrigation needs. Any plant materials shall be installed and maintained in a neat, vigorous, and healthy condition. Irrigation will be monitored to establish proper time of watering. Rain shutoff devices and shut off valves/flow reducers will be used to prevent erosion, over watering, and prolong plant life. The irrigation system shall minimize excess irrigation and irrigation runoff throughout the project site. Landscaping and irrigation systems will be inspected monthly and maintained as needed. CASQA BMP SD-12 Funding for the Operation and Maintenance program for the site will be by JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC   Section V  JPI WQMP Report  Page 41  Section V Inspection/Maintenance Responsibility for BMPs Inspection and maintenance records must be kept for a minimum of five years for inspection by the regulatory agencies. Responsibility and funding for long term inspection and maintenance of all non-structural and structural source control BMPs and all treatment control BMPs is by: JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 San Diego, CA 92130 (858) 369-5682 Rosie Cooper BMP Inspection/Maintenance BMP Reponsible Party(s) Inspection/ Maintenance Activities Required Minimum Frequency of Activities SD-12 Efficient Irrigation JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Vegetation shall be grouped according to similar watering needs. Rain shutoff devices and shut off valves/flow reducers will be used to prevent erosion, overwatering, and prolong plant life. Irrigation system shall minimize excess irrigation and irrigation runoff throughout the project site. Broken heads or lines will be replaced within a timely manner. Monthly SD-13 Storm Drain Stencilling and Signage JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Check for legibility and repaint when necessary Annually. Re-stencilling is required, at a minimum, every five years. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section V  JPI WQMP Report   Page 42  SD-32 Trash Enclosure JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Keep lids closed. Keep area clean. Replace damaged and leaking dumpsters. Weekly Education for Property Owners, Tenants and Occupants JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Have educational and BMP materials available to distribute/review. Upon hire or signing and annually Activity Restrictions JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Review restricted activities. Monitoring for evidence of performed restricted activities. Daily SC-41 Common Area Landscape Management JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Maintenance: trimming; mowing; weeding; removal of litter; fertilizing; water conservation; replacement of dead, diseased, or dying plants; properly dispose of waste; minimize pesticide and fertilizer use and apply in accordance with governing regulations. Monthly BMP Maintenance JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  As specified within this list and report. As required FF-13 Common Area Litter Control JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Closing lids of waste receptacles. Keep trash receptacle area clean. Empty containers before they are full. Picking up litter and debris from site. Weekly Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section V  JPI WQMP Report   Page 43  Employee Training JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Periodic review of this report and other materials that educate about stormwater pollution and its prevention. Upon hire and annually SC-44 Common Area Catch Basin Inspection JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Remove waste and debris. Repair any damages. Inspection shall be performed monthly and after every rain event. Catch Basins shall be cleaned when sump is 40% full but at a minimum annually before the rain season. SC-43 Sweeping of street and parking structure JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Sweep street and parking structure and properly dispose of trash and material. Monthly Infiltration Basin JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC Remove accumulated  sediment or debris.   Inspect soil and  Plantings. Remove  weeds, prune  vegetation and  replenish mulch as  needed. Till soil and  replant when  necessary to maintain  even infiltration.  Correct and replant  eroded areas. Inspection: Monthly    Maintenance: Monthly Bioretention Planter JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC Remove accumulated  sediment or debris.   Inspect soil and  plantings. Remove  weeds, prune  vegetation and  replenish mulch as  needed. Till soil and  replant when  necessary to maintain  even infiltration.  Correct and replant  Inspection: Monthly    Maintenance: Monthly Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section V  JPI WQMP Report   Page 44  eroded areas. CSP Retention Tank JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC Inspect and remove trash and debris from tank twice a year. Bi-Annual Remove accumulated sediment. Annual Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section VI  JPI WQMP Report   Page 45  Section VI BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) VI.1 BMP Exhibit (Site Plan) Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Section VII  JPI WQMP Report  Page 46 Section VII Educational Materials Refer to the Orange County Stormwater Program (ocwatersheds.com) for a library of materials available. Education Materials Residential Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable Business Material (http://www.ocwatersheds.com) Check If Applicable The Ocean Begins at Your Front Door Tips for the Automotive Industry Tips for Car Wash Fund-raisers Tips for Using Concrete and Mortar Tips for the Home Mechanic Tips for the Food Service Industry Homeowners Guide for Sustainable Water Use Proper Maintenance Practices for Your Business Household Tips Other Material Check If Attached Proper Disposal of Household Hazardous Waste Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (North County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (Central County) Recycle at Your Local Used Oil Collection Center (South County) Tips for Maintaining a Septic Tank System Responsible Pest Control Sewer Spill Tips for the Home Improvement Projects Tips for Horse Care Tips for Landscaping and Gardening Tips for Pet Care Tips for Pool Maintenance Tips for Residential Pool, Landscape and Hardscape Drains Tips for Projects Using Paint   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Attachments  JPI WQMP Report  Page 47 Attachments Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Attachment A  JPI WQMP Report  Page 48 Attachment A Educational Materials                           Will submit with Final WQMP   Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Attachment B  JPI WQMP Report  Page 49 Attachment B BMP Fact Sheets/Brochures TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-20 December 20, 2013 XIV.3. Infiltration BMP Fact Sheets (INF) INF-1: Infiltration Basin Fact Sheet An infiltration basin consists of an earthen basin constructed in naturally pervious soils (Type A or B soils) with a flat bottom. An energy dissipating inlet must be provided, along with an emergency spillway to control excess flows. An optional relief underdrain may be provided to drain the basin if standing water conditions occur. A forebay settling basin or separate treatment control measure must be provided as pretreatment. An infiltration basin retains the stormwater quality design volume in the basin and allows the retained runoff to percolate into the underlying soils in 72 hours or less. The bottom of an infiltration basin is typically vegetated with dryland grasses or irrigated turf grass; however other types of vegetation are permissible if they can survive periodic inundation and long inter-event dry periods. Feasibility Screening Considerations x Infiltration bains shall pass infeasibility screening criteria to be considered for use x Infiltration basins pose a potential risk of groundwater contamination if underlying soils have very high permeability and low pollutant assimilation capacity; pretreatment should always be provided. x Evaporation tends to be minor, therefore increases in infiltration compared to natural conditions may result. x The potential for groundwater mounding should be evaluated if depth to seasonally high groundwater (unmounded) is less than 15 feet. Opportunity Criteria x Soils are adequate for infiltration or can be amended to provide an adequate infiltration rate. x Typically need 2-5 percent of drainage area available for infiltration. x Space available for pretreatment (biotreatment or treatment control BMP as described below). x Potential for groundwater contamination can be mitigated through isolation of pollutant sources, pretreatment of inflow, and/or demonstration of adequate treatment capacity of underlying soils. x Infiltration is into native soil, or x The depth of engineered fill is ≤ 5 feet from the bottom of the facility to native material and infiltration into fill is approved by a geotechnical professional. x Tributary area land uses include mixed-use and commercial, sngle-family and multi-family, roads and parking lots, and parks and open spaces. Basins can be integrated into parks and open spaces. High pollutant land uses should not be tributary to infiltration BMPs. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Placement of BMPs shall observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set-backs (e.g., foundations, Infiltration Basin Source: Pennsylvania Stormwater BMP Manual Also known as: ¾Recharge basins ¾Infiltration pond TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-21 December 20, 2013 utilities, roadways, etc.) □ For facilities with tributary area less than 5 acres, minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater of 5 feet shall be observed. □ For facilities with tributary area greater than 5 acres, minimum separation to mounded seasonally high groundwater of 10 feet shall be observed. □ Minimum pretreatment (settling forebay or separate BMP) should be provided upstream of the infiltration basin, and water bypassing pretreatment should not be directed to the infiltration basin. □ If a settling forebay is used, forebay should have a volume equal to 25% of facility volume and have a minimum length to width ratio of 2:1 □ Infiltration basins should not be used for drainage areas with high sediment production potential unless preceded by full treatment control with a BMP effective for sediment removal. □ Side-slopes should be no steeper than 3H:1V. □ Design infiltration rate should be determined consistent with guidance contained in Appendix VII. □ Energy dissipators should be provided at inlet and outlet to prevent erosion. □ An overflow device must be provided if basin is on-line. □ A minimum freeboard of one foot should be provided above the overflow device (for an on-line basin) or the outlet (for an off-line basin). □ Infiltration basin bottom must be as flat as possible. □ Basin length to width ratio should be a minimum of 2:1 L:W. Simple Sizing Method for Infiltration Basins If the Simple DCV Sizing Method is used to size an infiltration basin, the user calculates the DCV and designs the BMP geometry required to draw down the DCV in 48 hours. The sizing steps are as follows: Step 1: Determine Infiltration Basin DCV Calculate the DCV using the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1. Step 2: Determine the 48-hour Depth The depth of water that can be drawn down in 48 hours can be calculated using the following equation: d48 = KDESIGN × 4 Where: d48 = basin 48-hour drawdown depth, ft KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) This is the maximum depth of the basin below the overflow device to achieve drawdown in 48 hours. Step 3: Calculate the Required Infiltrating Area The required infiltrating area (i.e. basin area at mid ponding depth) can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV / (dP) TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-22 December 20, 2013 Where: A = required basin infiltrating area, sq-ft (assumed to be the basin area at mid-ponding depth) DCV = design capture volume, cu-ft (see Step 1) dP = ponding depth, ft (should be equal to or less than d48) Capture Efficiency Method for Infiltration Basins If BMP geometry has already been defined and deviates from the 48 hour drawdown time, the designer can use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (See Appendix III.3.2) to determine the fraction of the DCV that must be provided to manage 80 percent of average annual runoff volume. This method accounts for drawdown time different than 48 hours. Step 1: Determine the drawdown time associated with the selected basin geometry DD = (dP / KDESIGN) × 12 Where: DD = time to completely drain infiltration basin ponding depth, hours dP = ponding depth below overflow device, ft KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) Step 2: Determine the Required Adjusted DCV for this Drawdown Time Use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (Appendix III.3.2) to calculate the fraction of the DCV the basin must hold to achieve 80 percent capture of average annual stormwater runoff volume based on the basin drawdown time calculated above. Step 3: Determine the Basin Infiltrating Area Needed The required infiltrating area (i.e. basin bottom) can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV/ ((dP) Where: A = required basin infiltrating area, sq-ft (assumed to be the basin area at mid-ponding depth) DCV = design capture volume, adjusted for drawdown time, cu-ft (see Step 1) dP = ponding depth, ft If the area required is greater than the selected basin area, adjust surface area or adjust ponding depth and recalculate required area until the required area is achieved. Configuration for Use in a Treatment Train x Infiltration basins may be preceeded in a treatment train by HSCs in the drainage area, which would reduce the required design volume of the basins. x Infiltration basins must be preceeded by some form of pretreatment, which may be biotreatment or a treatment control BMP; if an approved biotreatment BMP is used as pretreatment, the overflow from the infiltration basin may be considered “biotreated” for the purposes of meeting the LID requirements. x The overflow or bypass from an infiltration basin can be routed to a downstream biotreatment BMP and/or a treatment control BMP if additional control is required to achieve LID or treatment control requirements. TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-23 December 20, 2013 Additional References for Design Guidance x CASQA BMP Handbook for New and Redevelopment: http://www.cabmphandbooks.com/Documents/Development/TC-11.pdf x SMC LID Manual (pp 139): http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/guest75/pub/All_Projects/SoCal_LID_Manual/SoCalL ID_Manual_FINAL_040910.pdf x Los Angeles County Stormwater BMP Design and Maintenance Manual, Chapter 6: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/DES/design_manuals/StormwaterBMPDesignandMaintenance.pdf x City of Portland Stormwater Management Manual (Basin, page 2-57) http://www.portlandonline.com/bes/index.cfm?c=47954&a=202883 x San Diego County LID Handbook Appendix 4 (Factsheet 2): http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/LID-Appendices.pdf TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-28 December 20, 2013 INF-3: Bioretention with no Underdrain Bioretention stormwater treatment facilities are landscaped shallow depressions that capture and filter stormwater runoff. These facilities function as a soil and plant-based filtration device that removes pollutants through a variety of physical, biological, and chemical treatment processes. The facilities normally consist of a ponding area, mulch layer, planting soils, and plants. As stormwater passes down through the planting soil, pollutants are filtered, adsorbed, and biodegraded by the soil and plants. For areas with low permeability native soils or steep slopes, bioretention areas can be designed with an underdrain system that routes the treated runoff to the storm drain system rather than depending entirely on infiltration. Feasibility Screening Considerations x Bioretention with no underdrains shall pass infiltration infeasibility screening criteria to be considered for use. Opportunity Criteria x Land use may include commercial, residential, mixed use, institutional, and subdivisions. Bioretention may also be applied in parking lot islands, cul-de-sacs, traffic circles, road shoulders, and road medians. x Drainage area is ≤ 5 acres, preferrably ≤ 1 acre. x Area available for infiltration. x Soils are adequate for infiltration or can be amended to improve infiltration capacity. Site slope is less than 15 percent. OC-Specific Design Criteria and Considerations □ Placement of BMPs should observe geotechnical recommendations with respect to geological hazards (e.g. landslides, liquefaction zones, erosion, etc.) and set-backs (e.g., foundations, utilities, roadways, etc.) □ Depth to mounded seasonally high groundwater shall not be less than 5 feet. □ If sheet flow is conveyed to the treatment area over stabilized grassed areas, the site must be graded in such a way that minimizes erosive conditions; sheet flow velocities should not exceed 1 foot per second. □ Ponding depth should not exceed 18 inches; fencing may be required if ponding depth exceeds 6 inches to mitigate the risk of drowning. □ Planting/storage media shall be based on the recommendations contained in MISC-1: Planting/Storage Media □ The minimum amended soil depth is 1.5 feet (3 feet is preferred). □ The maximum drawdown time of the planting soil is 48 hours. Also known as: ¾Rain gardens ¾Infiltration planter Bioretention Source: Geosyntec Consultants TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-29 December 20, 2013 □ Infiltration pathways may need to be restricted due to the close proximity of roads, foundations, or other infrastructure. A geomembrane liner, or other equivalent water proofing, may be placed along the vertical walls to reduce lateral flows. This liner should have a minimum thickness of 30 mils. □ Plant materials should be tolerant of summer drought, ponding fluctuations, and saturated soil conditions for 48 hours; native plant species and/or hardy cultivars that are not invasive and do not require chemical fertilizers or pesticides should be used to the maximum extent feasible. □ The bioretention area should be covered with 2-4 inches (average 3 inches) of mulch at startup and an additional placement of 1-2 inches of mulch should be added annually. □ An optional gravel drainage layer may be installed below planting media to augment storage volume. □ An overflow device is required at the top of the ponding depth. □ Dispersed flow or energy dissipation (i.e. splash rocks) for piped inlets should be provided at basin inlet to prevent erosion. Simple Sizing Method for Bioretention with no Underdrain If the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1 is used to size a bioretention area with underdrains, the user calculates the DCV and designs the system with geometry required to draw down the DCV in 48 hours. The sizing steps are as follows: Step 1: Determine the Bioretention Design Capture Volume Calculate the DCV using the Simple Design Capture Volume Sizing Method described in Appendix III.3.1. Step 2: Determine the 48-hour Ponding Depth The depth of effective storage depth that can be drawn down in 48 hours can be calculated using the following equation: d48 = KDESIGN × 4 Where: d48 = bioretention 48-hour effective depth, ft KDESIGN = bioretention design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) This is the maximum effective depth of the basin below the overflow device to achieve drawdown in 48 hours. Effective depth includes ponding water and media/aggregate pore space. Step 3: Design System Geometry to Provide d48 Design system geometry such that d48 ≥ dEFFECTIVE = (dP + nMdM + nGdG) Where: d48 = depth of water that can drain in 48 hours dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft dP = bioretention ponding depth, ft (should be less than or equal to 1.5 ft) nM = bioretention media porosity dM = bioretention media depth, ft TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-30 December 20, 2013 nG = bioretention gravel layer porosity; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dG = bioretention gravel layer depth, ft Step 4: Calculate the Required Infiltrating Area The required infiltrating area (i.e. measured at the media surface) can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV / dEFFECTIVE Where: A = required infiltrating area, sq-ft (measured as the media surface area) DCV = design capture volume, cu-ft (see Step 1) dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft (from Step 3) This does not include the side slopes, access roads, etc. which would increase bioretention footprint. Capture Efficiency Method for Bioretention with no Underdrain If BMP geometry has already been defined and deviates from the 48 hour drawdown time, the designer can use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (See Appendix III.3.2) to determine the fraction of the DCV that must be provided to manage 80 percent of average annual runoff volume. This method accounts for drawdown time different than 48 hours. Step 1: Determine the drawdown time associated with the selected basin geometry DD = (dEFFECTIVE / KDESIGN) × 12 in/ft Where: DD = time to completely drain infiltration basin ponding depth, hours dEFFECTIVE ≤ (dP + nMdM + nGdG) dP = bioretention ponding depth, ft (should be less than or equal to 1.5 ft) nM = bioretention media porosity dM = bioretention media depth, ft nG = bioretention gravel layer porosity; 0.35 may be assumed where other information is not available dG = bioretention gravel layer depth, ft KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) Step 2: Determine the Required Adjusted DCV for this Drawdown Time Use the Capture Efficiency Method for Volume-Based, Constant Drawdown BMPs (See Appendix III.3.2) to calculate the fraction of the DCV the basin must hold to achieve 80 percent capture of average annual stormwater runoff volume based on the basin drawdown time calculated above. Step 4: Check that the Bioretention Effective Depth Drains in no Greater than 96 Hours DD = (dEFFECTIVE / KDESIGN) × 12 Where: DD = time to completely drain bioretention facility, hours dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft (from Step 3) KDESIGN = basin design infiltration rate, in/hr (See Appendix VII) TECHNICAL GUIDANCE DOCUMENT APPENDICES XIV-31 December 20, 2013 If DDALL is greater than 96 hours, adjust bioretention media depth and/or gravel layer depth until DD is less than 96 hours. This duration is based on preventing extended periods of saturation from causing plant mortality. Step 5: Determine the Basin Infiltrating Area Needed The required infiltrating area (i.e. the surface area of the top of the media layer) can be calculated using the following equation: A = DCV/ dEFFECTIVE Where: A = required infiltrating area, sq-ft (measured at the media surface) DCV = design capture volume, adjusted for drawdown time, cu-ft (see Step 1) dEFFECTIVE = total effective depth of water stored in bioretention area, ft (from Step 3) This does not include the side slopes, access roads, etc. which would increase bioretention footprint. If the area required is greater than the selected basin area, adjust surface area or adjust ponding depth and recalculate required area until the required area is achieved. Configuration for Use in a Treatment Train x Bioretention areas may be preceeded in a treatment train by HSCs in the drainage area, which would reduce the required volume of the bioretention cell. x Bioretention areas can be incorporated in a treatment train to provide enhanced water quality treatment and reductions in runoff volume and rate. For example, runoff can be collected from a roadway in a vegetated swale that then flows to a bioretention area. Similarly, bioretention could be used to manage overflow from a cistern. Additional References for Design Guidance x CASQA BMP Handbook for New and Redevelopment: http://www.cabmphandbooks.com/Documents/Development/TC-32.pdf x SMC LID Manual (pp 68): http://www.lowimpactdevelopment.org/guest75/pub/All_Projects/SoCal_LID_Manual/SoCalL ID_Manual_FINAL_040910.pdf x Los Angeles County Stormwater BMP Design and Maintenance Manual, Chapter 5: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/DES/design_manuals/StormwaterBMPDesignandMaintenance.pdf x San Diego County LID Handbook Appendix 4 (Factsheet 7): http://www.sdcounty.ca.gov/dplu/docs/LID-Appendices.pdf x Los Angeles Unified School District (LAUSD) Stormwater Technical Manual, Chapter 4. http://www.laschools.org/employee/design/fs-studies-and- reports/download/white_paper_report_material/Storm_Water_Technical_Manual_2009-opt- red.pdf?version_id=76975850 County of Los Angeles Low Impact Development Standards Manual, Chapter 5: http://dpw.lacounty.gov/wmd/LA_County_LID_Manual.pdf 1 The Stormwater Management StormFilter® ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS StormFilter Configuration Guide 2 The Stormwater Management StormFilter® The Stormwater Management StormFilter (StormFilter) is a passive, flow-through, stormwater filtration system. The system is comprised of one or more structures that house rechargeable, media-filled cartridges which trap particulates and adsorb materials such as dissolved metals, hydrocarbons, and nutrients in polluted runoff. The StormFilter system comes in a variety of configurations and sizes to meet any site need. A variety of filter media is available and can be customized for each site to remove the desired pollutants. Basic Design The StormFilter is sized to treat the peak flow of a water quality design storm. The peak flow or WQv is determined from calculations based on the contributing watershed hydrology and from a design storm magnitude set by the local stormwater management agency. The StormFilter system is modular and each unit is designed with the number of cartridges required to meet the peak design flow rate, WQv or cap. The flow rate through each filter cartridge is set to meet the jurisdictional performance requirements, allowing control over the amount of contact time between the influent and the filter media. The maximum flow rate through each cartridge can be adjusted, between 0.26 gpm/ft2 and 2 gpm/ft2 of surface area, using a calibrated restrictor disc at the base of each filter cartridge. Adjustments to the cartridge flow rate will affect the number of cartridges required to treat the peak flow or WQv. Please contact your local Contech representative for site-specific design assistance. 3 the design driving head. The flow rate is individually controlled for each cartridge by a restrictor disc located at the connection point between the cartridge and the under-drain manifold. Consisting of a simple orifice disc of a specific diameter, the flow rate through the cartridges can be adjusted to a level that coincides with your treatment requirements by using a disc with the appropriate orifice diameter. A reduction in flow rate affects the performance of the StormFilter system with regards to both sediment and soluble pollutants. For solids, Stokes’ Law predicts the movement of sediment in a fluid and it has been proven that a reduction in the flow velocity through the system will facilitate increased settling and capture of sediments. In addition, some media types have the ability to remove soluble pollutants through chemical processes, like ion exchange. A reduction in the flow velocity through the StormFilter cartridge will increase the contact time between the stormwater and the media, thereby increasing the removal efficiency by increasing the time for a chemical process to take place. Media type can be changed, but flow rate adjustment requires engineering consultation to ensure hydraulic demands are satisfied. Through routine maintenance, a media filtration system can adjust the media type to target or update the system to treating specific pollutants, new TMDLs, or changing pollutants of concern. The media change out can provide a long-term solution to changing regulatory requirements. Basic Operation Priming System Function The system is designed to siphon stormwater runoff through the StormFilter cartridge. Stormwater enters a StormFilter cartridge, percolates horizontally through the cartridge’s filter media and collects in the center tube where the float valve is in a closed (downward) position. As water passes through the filter media and into the cartridge’s center tube, the air in the cartridge is displaced by the water and purged from beneath the filter hood through the one-way check valve located in the cap. Once the center tube is filled with water, there is enough buoyant force to open the float valve and allow the treated water in the center tube to flow into the under-drain manifold. This causes the check valve to close, initiating a siphon that draws polluted water throughout the full surface area and volume of the filter. Thus, the entire filter cartridge is used to filter water throughout the duration of the storm, regardless of the water surface elevation in the unit. This siphon continues until the water surface elevation drops to the elevation of the hood’s scrubbing regulators, and the float returns to a closed position. Utilizing the hydraulic potential in the cartridge, the scrubbing regulators cause the filter surface to be clean of attached sediments thus extending the filter’s operational life. Flow and Valve Control The filtration rate through a typical StormFilter cartridge can be adjusted so that it has a maximum flow rate of 2 gpm/ft2 at 4 StormFilter Configurations The StormFilter technology can be configured to meet your unique site requirements. Downstream Treatment Configurations Conventional stormwater treatment involves collecting, conveying and treating stormwater runoff with an end of pipe treatment system before discharging off-site. StormFilter configurations suitable for these applications are listed below and can be engineered to treat a wide range of flows. Vault/Manhole The Vault/Manhole consists of one or more precast concrete structures ranging from 48” manholes to 8’ x 24’ vaults. The largest unit treats water quality design flows up to 3.75 cfs, and can be placed in series or in parallel to treat higher flows if needed. A Vault/Manhole configuration can be installed online or offline from storm system, where the unit has internal overflow bypass. These systems can also be installed offline, where high flows are bypassed around the treatment system and there is no internal overflow. However, if detention, pretreatment, or bypassing is required, it can be installed offline of the storm system. 48”Ø INLET PIPE 12” Ø HDPE OUTLET STUB Basic Operation Vault/Manhole systems are housed in either a vault or manhole. Stormwater first enters the structure through the inlet pipe where it is directed through the energy dissipator. This gently spreads the flow to minimize re-suspension of previously captured pollutants. Once in the filtration area, the stormwater begins to pond and percolate horizontally through the media contained in the filter cartridges. After passing through the media, treated water that has collected in the cartridge center tube is directed into the outlet sump by an under-drain manifold. The treated water in the outlet sump is then discharged through the outlet pipe. Precast StormFilter systems have an internal bypass capability from 1.0 cfs to 2.0 cfs, depending upon the size of the system. If peaks flows to the system exceed 2.0 cfs, an offline high flow bypass is needed. Vault/Manhole StormFilter 5 High Flow StormFilter High Flow StormFilter systems can be designed within a variety of structures to meet local requirements and streamline installation. These systems are designed for large sites and large flows. Too big for standard precast structures, they are usually built from precast components that are assembled on site. The High Flow StormFilter is available in several configurations: CON/SPAN®, Panel Vaults, Box Culverts, or Cast-In-Place. Basic Operation The High Flow StormFilter design has the same basic configuration and components as the Precast StormFilter but operates on a larger scale. Peak Diversion StormFilter The Peak Diversion StormFilter includes a treatment chamber and offline by-pass capability in one precast vault. Sizes range from 8’x11” to 8’x24” in most areas. Larger units can treat up to 2.5 cfs depending on cartridge height and the approved flow rate of regulatory jurisdiction. The integrated off-line bypass eliminates upstream flow splitters, downstream junction structures, and additional piping to save space and reduce the overall foot print. This lowers materials and installation cost while reducing potential conflicts with right of way (ROW) boundaries and utilities. Basic Operation Stormwater enters the structure through one or two inlet pipes into the inlet bay and low flows are directed to the filtration bay through a transfer opening. Once in the filtration area, the stormwater begins to pond and percolate horizontally through the media contained in the filter cartridges. After passing through the media, treated water that has collected in the cartridge center tube is directed into the outlet bay by an under-drain manifold. The treated water in the outlet sump is then discharged through the outlet pipe. During large storm events greater than the treatment capacity, peak flows are diverted across the overflow weir directly to the outlet. Even during high flows the cartridges are still operating and water is entering the filtration bay from the inlet bay. This continuous flow into the filter bay helps ensure pollutants can not be washed out during high flow events. High Flow StormFilter Peak Diversion StormFilter 3’-3” (16’-0”) (8 ’ - 0 ” ) INLET BAY FL O W TRANSFER HOLE AND COVER ALTERNATEPIPE LOCATION OUTLET BAY FILTRATION BAY STORMFILTER CARTRIDGE SEPARATION WALL FRAME ANDCOVER (TYP OF 2) GRADE RINGS/RISERS(TYP OF 2) INLET PIPE WEIR WALL OUTLET PIPE STORMFILTERCARTRIDGE FLOW KIT STEPS (H ) (W ) 5’ - 3 ” M I N (6 ’ - 0 ” ) 6 Volume StormFilter The Volume StormFilter is designed to meet volume-based regulations where a specific water quality volume (WQv) must be captured and treated. In addition to the treatment, the structure can be sized to capture all or a portion of the WQv. Restrictor discs inside each cartridge can be used to control the discharge rate from the system. The size of the disc is calibrated to provide the design filtration rate at a live storage depth. Because of these discs (and the airlock cap with a one way vent) water can be impounded above the cartridges in the treatment bay. Structures range in size from a 48” manhole to CON/SPAN sections with a 24’ x 10’ cross section built to length. In many cases smaller structures are combined with outboard storage, such as pipe, to provide the WQv storage. The Volume StormFilter can be designed with or without an internal bypass. If peak flows to the system exceed the internal bypass, or external bypass. If peak flows to the system exceed the internal bypass, or external bypass is required, a high flow bypass is needed. The system can also be installed online or offline and uses a traffic-bearing lid. Basic Operation The Volume StormFilter is typically configured in one of two ways. A three bay system that incorporates internal storage for the WQv and includes: the storage bay, the filtration bay, and the outlet bay. Water first enters the storage bay (a portion of which includes dead storage) which facilitates pretreatment (gravity separation) and storage of the WQv. The stormwater is then directed into the filtration bay for full treatment and additional storage. The storage bay can be designed with a baffle to trap floatables, oils, and surface scum. Cartridges in the filtration bay treat the stormwater and control the discharge rate. Once in the filtration bay, the stormwater percolates horizontally through the media contained in the filter cartridges. After passing through the cartridge, treated water is directed to the outlet bay by an under-drain manifold where it is discharged through an outlet pipe. A two bay, precast vault bases system similar to the Vault StormFilter where pretreatment and live storage are provided upstream. Providing WQv storage in an outboard storage facility such as storage pipe provides the versatility to meet most footprint and elevation requirements. Volume StormFilter 7 Upstream Treatment Configurations Low Impact Design (LID) involves managing runoff close to the source using small, decentralized system. The following suite of StormFilter configurations are easily incorporated on sites where LID site design is recommended. These low-cost, lowdrop, point-of-entry systems also work well when you have a compact drainage area. CatchBasin StormFilter The CatchBasin StormFilter (CBSF) consists of a multi-chamber steel, concrete, or plastic catch basin unit that contains up to four StormFilter cartridges. The steel CBSF is offered both as a standard and as a deep unit. The CBSF is installed flush with the finished grade and is applicable for small drainage areas from roadways and parking lots, and retrofit applications. It can also be fitted with an inlet pipe for roof leaders or similar applications. The CBSF unit treats water quality design flows up to 0.20 cfs, coupled with an internal weir overflow capacity of 1.0 cfs for the standard steel and concrete units and 1.8 cfs for the deep steel units. Non-traffic rated plastic CBSF units have an internal weir overflow capacity of 0.5 cfs. Basic Operation The CBSF acts as the primary receiver of runoff, similar to a standard, grated catch basin. The steel and concrete CBSF units each have an H-20 rated, traffic-bearing lid that allows the filter to be installed in parking lots and take up no land area. Plastic CBSF units can be used in landscaped areas and for other non-traffic bearing applications. The CBSF consists of a sumped inlet chamber and cartridge chamber(s). Runoff enters the sumped inlet chamber either by sheet flow from a paved surface or from an inlet pipe discharging directly to the unit. The inlet chamber’s internal baffle traps debris and floating oil, and houses an overflow weir. Heavier solids settle into the deep sump, while lighter solids and soluble pollutants are directed under the baffle and into the cartridge chamber through a port between the baffle and the overflow weir. Once in the cartridge chamber, polluted water ponds and percolates horizontally through the media in the filter cartridges. Treated water collects in the cartridge’s center tube from where it is directed by an under- drain manifold to the outlet pipe on the downstream side of the overflow weir and discharged. When flows into the CBSF exceed the water quality design value, excess water spills over the overflow weir, bypassing the cartridge bay, and discharges to the outlet pipe. The CBSF is particularly useful where small flows are being treated or for sites that are flat and have little available hydraulic head to spare. The unit is ideal for applications in which standard catch basins are to be used. Both water quality and catchment issues can be resolved with the use of the CBSF. CatchBasin StormFilter 8 Curb Inlet StormFilter The Curb Inlet StormFilter consists of a precast concrete vault ranging from 6’x8’ to 8’x16’ in size. These units can treat water quality design flows up to 1.2 cfs. The system is installed online and includes an internal offline overflow bypass around the filtration chamber. The internal bypass capability is based on depth of the structure. The standard bypass capacity is 15 cfs but is larger for deeper units. A traffic-bearing lid is placed underneath the median or sidewalk adjacent to the roadway. Basic Operation The Curb Inlet StormFilter is composed of three bays: the inlet bay, the filtration bay, and the outlet bay. Stormwater enters the inlet bay through the curb inlet opening. The design flow is directed through a transfer opening to the filtration bay for full treatment. Once in the filtration bay, the stormwater percolates horizontally through the media in the filter cartridges to the center tube. Treated water in the cartridge center tube is directed into the outlet bay by an under-drain manifold and discharged through the outlet pipe. Outlet pipes can be placed parallel, perpendicular, or up to 45° to the roadway. Overflow is directed over a weir wall between the inlet bay and the outlet bay, bypassing the filtration bay leaving accumulated pollutants undisturbed. Curb Inlet Openings Every Curb Inlet StormFilter is designed to meet local regulations governing the geometry of the curb inlet. This can be accomplished in two ways. One way is with an integrated face plate – the vault lid includes the face plate which is tied into the curb. Another way is with a cast-in-place face plate – the entire face plate is constructed by the contractor pouring the curb. Curb inlet openings can be 4’, 7‘, or 10’ in length. Linear Grate StormFilter The Linear Grate StormFilter is a precast vault that acts as the primary receiver of runoff, similar to a standard grated catch basin. The unit has H-20 rated traffic bearing lids that allow the filter to be installed under parking lots. The system consists of an inlet bay, filtration bay, and an outlet bay. Providing treatment as it enters the conveyance system reduces the overall head loss because the vertical drop from the finished grade into the conveyance system is also used to provide hydraulic pressure on the filter cartridges. Basic Operation Runoff enters the inlet bay by sheet flow from a paved surface or from an inlet pipe discharging directly to the unit. The inlet bay’s internal baffle traps debris and floating oil and denser pollutants are directed into the filtration bay. Once in the cartridge chamber, polluted water ponds and percolates through a radial media filter cartridge. Treated water collects in the cartridge’s center tube where it is directed by an underdrain manifold to the outlet pipe on the downstream side of the overflow weir. When flow rates exceed the water quality design value, excess water spills across the overflow weir, bypassing the cartridge bay and proceed directly to the outlet pipe. The integrated offline bypass ensures pollutants captured in the filtration bay are not washed downstream during peak flow events. Curb Inlet StormFilter 9 Grated Inlet Openings The number of inlet grates and the size of the inlet bay are designed to capture the peak flow rates from the drainage area. The remaining area is devoted to the filtration bay and the outlet bay which are covered with removable plates for access during maintenance. The entire inlet bay, filtration bay, and outlet bay can be opened at one time allowing full access. In many cases, due to the shallow nature of the design, confined space entry is not required for maintenance. Linear StormFilter The Linear StormFilter consists of one or two precast concrete channels that are 10’ or 20’ in length and 2’ 9” in width. The Linear StormFilter is installed flush with the finished grade, functioning similar to a catch basin or trench drain. The top of the unit has either covers or doors for easy access. The Linear StormFilter is typically installed online like the precast StormFilter. The Linear StormFilter unit treats water quality design flows up to 0.27 cfs. Basic Operation The Linear StormFilter can be installed either as the primary receiver of runoff, similar to a grated catch basin, or with an inlet stub and doors to receive runoff collected upstream. The system is equipped with an internal overflow weir to ensure that there is no local flooding for storm events in excess of the design treatment flow. Maintenance costs for the unit are typically less because there are no confined space entry requirements, and access is quick and easy. The Linear StormFilter is particularly useful where small flows are being treated or where the site is very flat and there is little available hydraulic head to spare. Linear StormFilter Linear Grate StormFilter 4” FULL HEIGHTBAFFLE FLOATABLESBAFFLE 4” BYPASSWEIR B (3 ’ - 0 ” - 5 ’ 0 ” ) TRANSFEROPENING 6” FLOWKIT STORMFILTERCARTRIDGEB TRANSFEROPENING FL O W PIPE DPIPE CPIPE C PIPE B PIPE A A PIPE F AFILTRATION BAY SECONDARYFILTRATION BAY INLETBAY OUTLETBAY STORMFILTERCARTRIDGEALTERNATEPIPE LOCATION 6’ - 0 ” 10’-0” 10 Infiltration Configuration Dry Well StormFilter The Dry Well StormFilter provides treatment, infiltration and groundwater protection in a single structure. The system is designed to treat conveyed flow or sheet flow from small drainages. Multiple units can be installed to treat any size site. Because it provides treatment and infiltration in a single unit, the total number of structures and the amount of pipe required for the stormwater system are reduced. The Dry Well StormFilter system is available in 48”, 60” and 72-” pre-cast manhole top sections that are designed to be stacked on top of dry well infiltration risers. The StormFilter portion of the unit arrives fully assembled and ready to install, including an integrated concrete deck for the StormFilter cartridges. The system can also be retrofitted into existing 48” manhole dry wells. Basic Operation Stormwater enters the dry well unit through one or more entry pipes or channels at its top. It then percolates through the media in the StormFilter cartridge to the center tube. Treated water in the cartridge center tube is discharged to the infiltration section below, and then infiltrates into the surrounding soils through a number of small exit openings at the sides and bottom. Roof Runoff Treatment Configuration Downspout StormFilter The Downspout StormFilter is an aboveground configuration that can be easily integrated into existing gutter systems to eliminate pollution from rooftop runoff. It typically occupies 2.5’ x 5’ footprint, and can fit most downspout configurations and sizes. Each unit holds two StormFilter cartridges, and single- and dual-stage options are available. It treats up to 14,000 square feet of rooftop area per dual-cartridge system. StormFilter Cartridges There are three cartridge heights available for StormFilter systems: 27”, 18”, and Low Drop. The most economical is the 27” tall cartridge. It can treat the highest flow rate per cartridge, which creates the smallest system with the lowest installed cost. The 27” cartridge requires 3.05’ of driving head to operate. For sites with less driving head available, the 18” cartridge is the next best option. Lower flow rates per cartridge increase the footprint of the overall system but only 2.3’ of driving head is required. For sites with very limited drop, the Low Drop cartridge only requires 1.8” of driving head. Cartridge Hydraulic Treatment Type Drop Capacity (gpm) 1 gpm/ft2 2 gpm/ft2 StormFilter 27” 3.05’ 11.25 22.5 StormFilter 18” 2.30’ 7.5 15 StormFilter Low Drop 1.80’ 5 10 Cartridge Flow Rates DryWell StormFilter 11 StormFilter Media The removal of site-specific pollutants can be maximized with the variety of filtration media available. In many cases, different media types can be combined so as to target a wide spectrum of pollutants. This ability to combine and use various media types allows the system to be easily adjusted to meet ever-changing site conditions and increasingly stringent regulatory requirements. PhosphoSorb® PhosphoSorb, a lightweight media comprised of Perlite (a heat-expanded volcanic rock) and activated alumina, removes total phosphorus (TP) by absorbing dissolved-P and filtering particulate-P simultaneously. The Perlite provides the capability to remove suspended solids while the activated alumina absorbs soluble phosphorus absorption. PhosphoSorb is composed of a slightly finer gradation than the field proven ZPG™ (Zeolite, Perlite, Granular Activated Carbon) media and will provide equivalent - or even better - removal of suspended solids. Initial field tests have indicated an increase in the TSS removal efficiency up to 10% over the field-proven ZPG media. The StormFilter with ZPG media has already received a General Use Level Designation for basic treatment in the State of Washington. Perlite Perlite is a natural, volcanic ash, similar in composition to glass and similar in appearance to pumice. To use perlite as a filter medium, it must first go through a heating process to yield a lightweight, multicellular, expanded form. This expanded form has a coarse texture, very low-density, high surface area, and stable, inert chemistry, all of which make perlite an excellent physical filtration medium. Perlite has proven to be our media of choice for sediment and oil removal. The multicellular nature of expanded perlite is the key to its excellent ability to trap sediments and adsorb oil. The coarse texture of the expanded perlite creates a bed of material with a very high porosity, which allows perlite to have the highest sediment and oil storage capacity of all of the available media options. Zeolite The term zeolite defines a family of both natural and synthetic, hydrous aluminosilicate materials with a highly porous mineral matrix that holds light, alkali metal cations (ideally sodium ions). Zeolite has the ability to use a cation exchange reaction that removes other cations such as zinc, copper, lead, and ammonia from water. In the cation exchange reaction, the light metal cations in the zeolite matrix are displaced by the heavier metal cations, such as copper, in the water. The zeolite used in our system is clinoptilolite, which has a cation exchange capacity (CEC) of approximately 100 to 220 meq/100 g. Clinoptilolite has inert characteristics that make it an excellent metals removal media option when CSF media cannot be used. It can be combined with other media such as GAC and perlite when metals are not of exclusive concern. CSF® Leaf Media CSF Leaf Media is a patented filtration media composed of composted deciduous leaves originating from the City of Portland, Oregon. Contech Engineered Solutions purchases the mature, stable, deciduous leaf compost and then processes it into an odorless, pelletized compost product with physical and chemical characteristics desirable for stormwater filtration. The patented compost process creates a material with excellent flow-through characteristics and stability in water. Not only do CSF Leaf Media consist of 100% recycled, all natural materials, but it also provides good removal of sediments and excellent removal of a wide range of toxic contaminants. CSF Leaf Media provides the multitude of beneficial water treatment properties typical of soil in a form that is compatible with the compact, modular, media-based design of the StormFilter system. In addition to the physical filtration provided by the granular nature of the CSF Leaf Media, the complex chemistry of the compost also provides chemical filtration as well. Sediment and total nutrients are removed through physical filtration. Oil, complexed metals, and anthropogenic organic contaminants such as herbicides and pesticides are removed through adsorption, the physical partitioning of organic compounds, such as pesticides, to carbon-rich materials, such as the compost. Soluble metals are removed by cation exchange, as well as by complexation of metal ions to the organic chelating agents present in compost. CSF Leaf Media is an excellent, cost- effective, all-purpose media that epitomizes the potential value of recycled materials. GAC GAC (Granular Activated Carbon) is a widely accepted water filtration media used for the removal of organic compounds. It consists of pure carbon (originating from coal or charcoal) whose micro-porous structure has been enhanced through steam or acid “activation.” The high carbon content and porous nature of GAC accounts for its excellent ability to remove organic compounds through adsorption. Since adsorption is the physical partitioning of organic compounds to high carbon surfaces, the “activation” of the carbon (which creates GAC) endows it with an enormous surface area upon which adsorption can take place. 12 800.338.1122 • www.conteches.com SFConfigGuide-4 5/2015 Support • Drawings and specifications are available at contechstormwater.com. • Site-specific design support is available from Contech Stormwater Design Engineers. ©2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC Contech Engineered Solutions LLC provides site solutions for the civil engineering industry. Contech’s portfolio includes bridges, drainage, sanitary sewer, stormwater and earth stabilization products. For information on other Contech division offerings, visit contech- cpi.com or call 800.338.1122 NothiNG iN thiS CataLoG ShouLD bE CoNStruED aS aN ExprESSED warraNty or aN impLiED warraNty oF mErChaNtabiLity or FitNESS For aNy partiCuLar purpoSE. SEE thE CoNtECh StaNDarD CoNDitioNS oF SaLE (viEwabLE at www. CoNtEChES.Com/CoS) For morE iNFormatioN. the product(s) described may be protected by one or more of the following uS patents: 5,322,629; 5,624,576; 5,707,527; 5,759,415; 5,788,848; 5,985,157; 6,027,639; 6,350,374; 6,406,218; 6,641,720; 6,511,595; 6,649,048; 6,991,114; 6,998,038; 7,186,058; 7,296,692; 7,297,266; related foreign patents or other patents pending. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS In situations where anthropogenic organic contaminants are of exclusive concern, GAC media provide the highest level of stormwater treatment compared to other available media options. However, because it is not very often the case that anthropogenic organic contaminants are of exclusive concern, GAC is usually combined with another media such as perlite or zeolite for the treatment of additional contaminants. Combination of GAC with perlite constitutes the most cost-effective configuration, as the effectiveness of GAC is drastically reduced if it is coated with high concentrations of heavy oil or sediment, which can restrict access via surface pores to the interior of the GAC granules. ZPG™ (Zeolite, Perlite, GAC blend) This proprietary blend of zeolite, perlite, and granular activated carbon media is used to provide an alternative for CSF media for installations where leaf media cannot be used. Laboratory and Field Testing The StormFilter system is designed to meet the most stringent regulatory requirements. The field-proven performance of the StormFilter has led to hundreds of regulatory agency approvals nationwide as a standalone BMP. The Stormwater Management StormFilter® is the first manufactured BMP to receive stand-alone approval through field testing and satisfying the total suspended solids treatment requirements in Washington and New Jersey. Log on to www.conteches.com/stormfilter to view the following reports in full. Field Monitoring Reports Field Proven Performance of the StormFilter using the Technology Assessment Protocol - Ecology (TAPE) and Technology Acceptance Reciprocity Partnership (TARP) Tier II Protocol 1. Washington a. Washington State Department of Ecology General Use Level Designation for Basic Treatment b. Technical Evaluator Engineering Report (TEER). Gary Minton, Ph.D., P.E. 2. New Jersey a. New Jersey State Department of Environmental Protection Final Certification b. New Jersey Corporation for Advanced Technology (NJCAT) Field Verification Report Laboratory Reports Total Suspended Solids (TSS) Removal Using Different Particle Size Distributions with the Stormwater Management StormFilter. Influences on TSS removal efficiency Influence of analytical method, data summarization method, and particle size on total suspended solids (TSS) removal efficiency of the StormFilter StormFilter removal efficiency with coarse/fine perlite media Evaluation of the removal of silt loam TSS using coarse/ fine perlite at 28 L/min (7.5 gpm). StormFilter removal efficiency with ZPG media Evaluation of the removal of SIL-CO-SIL 106 using ZPG media at 28 L/min (7.5 gpm) StormFilter removal efficiency with coarse perlite Evaluation of the removal of sandy loam TSS using coarse perlite at 57 L/min (15 gpm) StormFilter Maintenance Guidelines Maintenance requirements and frequency are dependent on the pollutant load characteristics of each site, and may be required in the event of a chemical spill or due to excessive sediment loading. Maintenance Procedures Although there are other effective maintenance options, CONTECH recommends the following two step procedure: 1. Inspection: Determine the need for maintenance. 2. Maintenance: Cartridge replacement and sediment removal. Inspection and Maintenance Activity Timing At least one scheduled inspection activity should take place per year with maintenance following as warranted. First, inspection should be done before the winter season. During which, the need for maintenance should be determined and, if disposal during maintenance will be required, samples of the accumulated sediments and media should be obtained. Second, if warranted, maintenance should be performed during periods of dry weather. In addition, you should check the condition of the StormFilter unit after major storms for potential damage caused by high flows and for high sediment accumulation. It may be necessary to adjust the inspection/maintenance activity schedule depending on the actual operating conditions encountered by the system. Generally, inspection activities can be conducted at any time, and maintenance should occur when flows into the system are unlikely. Maintenance Activity Frequency Maintenance is performed on an as needed basis, based on inspection. Average maintenance lifecycle is 1-3 years. The primary factor controlling timing of maintenance of the StormFilter is sediment loading. Until appropriate timeline is determined, use the following: Inspection: One time per year After major storms Maintenance: As needed Per regulatory requirement In the event of a chemical spill Inspection Procedures It is desirable to inspect during a storm to observe the relative flow through the filter cartridges. If the submerged cartridges are severely plugged, then typically large amounts of sediments will be present and very little flow will be discharged from the drainage pipes. If this is the case, then maintenance is warranted and the cartridges need to be replaced. Warning: In the case of a spill, the worker should abort inspection activities until the proper guidance is obtained. Notify the local hazard control agency and CONTECH immediately. To conduct an inspection: Important: Inspection should be performed by a person who is familiar with the StormFilter treatment unit. 1. If applicable, set up safety equipment to protect and notify surrounding vehicle and pedestrian traffic. 2. Visually inspect the external condition of the unit and take notes concerning defects/problems. 3. Open the access portals to the vault and allow the system vent. 4. Without entering the vault, visually inspect the inside of the unit, and note accumulations of liquids and solids. 5. Be sure to record the level of sediment build-up on the floor of the vault, in the forebay, and on top of the cartridges. If flow is occurring, note the flow of water per drainage pipe. Record all observations. Digital pictures are valuable for historical documentation. 6. Close and fasten the access portals. 7. Remove safety equipment. 8. If appropriate, make notes about the local drainage area relative to ongoing construction, erosion problems, or high loading of other materials to the system. 9. Discuss conditions that suggest maintenance and make decision as to weather or not maintenance is needed. Maintenance Decision Tree The need for maintenance is typically based on results of the inspection. Use the following as a general guide. (Other factors, such as regulatory requirements, may need to be considered) 1. Sediment loading on the vault floor. If >4” of accumulated sediment, then go to maintenance. 2. Sediment loading on top of the cartridge. If >1/4” of accumulation, then go to maintenance. 3. Submerged cartridges. If >4” of static water in the cartridge bay for more that 24 hrs after end of rain event, then go to maintenance. 4. Plugged media. If pore space between media granules is absent, then go to maintenance. 5. Bypass condition. If inspection is conducted during an average rain fall event and StormFilter remains in bypass condition (water over the internal outlet baffle wall or submerged cartridges), then go to maintenance. 6. Hazardous material release. If hazardous material release (automotive fluids or other) is reported, then go to maintenance. 7. Pronounced scum line. If pronounced scum line (say ≥ 1/4” thick) is present above top cap, then go to maintenance. 8. Calendar Lifecycle. If system has not been maintained for 3 years, then go to maintenance. Assumptions: No rainfall for 24 hours or more. No upstream detention (at least not draining into StormFilter). Structure is online. Outlet pipe is clear of obstruction. Construction bypass is plugged. Maintenance Depending on the configuration of the particular system, workers will be required to enter the vault to perform the maintenance. 1 Important: If vault entry is required, OSHA rules for confined space entry must be followed. Filter cartridge replacement should occur during dry weather. It may be necessary to plug the filter inlet pipe if base flow is occurring. Replacement cartridges can be delivered to the site or customers facility. Contact CONTECH for more information. Warning: In the case of a spill, the worker should abort maintenance activities until the proper guidance is obtained. Notify the local hazard control agency and CONTECH immediately. To conduct cartridge replacement and sediment removal: 1. If applicable, set up safety equipment to protect workers and pedestrians from site hazards. 2. Visually inspect the external condition of the unit and take notes concerning defects/problems. 3. Open the doors (access portals) to the vault and allow the system to vent. 4. Without entering the vault, give the inside of the unit, including components, a general condition inspection. 5. Make notes about the external and internal condition of the vault. Give particular attention to recording the level of sediment build-up on the floor of the vault, in the forebay, and on top of the internal components. 6. Using appropriate equipment offload the replacement cartridges (up to 150 lbs. each) and set aside. 7. Remove used cartridges from the vault using one of the following methods: Method 1: A. This activity will require that workers enter the vault to remove the cartridges from the under drain manifold and place them under the vault opening for lifting (removal). Unscrew (counterclockwise rotations) each filter cartridge from the underdrain connector. Roll the loose cartridge, on edge, to a convenient spot beneath the vault access. Using appropriate hoisting equipment, attach a cable from the boom, crane, or tripod to the loose cartridge. Contact CONTECH for suggested attachment devices. Important: Cartridges containing leaf media (CSF) do not require unscrewing from their connectors. Do not damage the manifold connectors. They should remain installed in the manifold and can be capped during the maintenance activity to prevent sediments from entering the under drain manifold. B. Remove the used cartridges (up to 250 lbs.) from the vault. Important: Avoid damaging the cartridges during removal and installation. C. Set the used cartridge aside or load onto the hauling truck. D. Continue steps A through C until all cartridges have been removed. Method 2: A. Enter the vault using appropriate confined space protocols. B. Unscrew the cartridge cap. C. Remove the cartridge hood screws (3) hood and float. D. At location under structure access, tip the cartridge on its side. Important: Note that cartridges containing media other than the leaf media require unscrewing from their threaded connectors. Take care not to damage the manifold connectors. This connector should remain installed in the manifold and capped if necessary. E. Empty the cartridge onto the vault floor. Reassemble the empty cartridge. F. Set the empty, used cartridge aside or load onto the hauling truck. G. Continue steps a through E until all cartridges have been removed. 8. Remove accumulated sediment from the floor of the vault and from the forebay. Use vacuum truck for highest effectiveness. 9. Once the sediments are removed, assess the condition of the vault and the connectors. The connectors are short sections of 2-inch schedule 40 PVC, or threaded schedule 80 PVC that should protrude about 1” above the floor of the vault. Lightly wash down the vault interior. a. Replace any damaged connectors. 10. Using the vacuum truck boom, crane, or tripod, lower and install the new cartridges. Take care not to damage connections. 11. Close and fasten the door. 12. Remove safety equipment. 13. Finally, dispose of the accumulated materials in accordance with applicable regulations. Make arrangements to return the used empty cartridges to CONTECH. Material Disposal The accumulated sediment must be handled and disposed of in accordance with regulatory protocols. It is possible for sediments to contain measurable concentrations of heavy metals and organic chemicals. Areas with the greatest potential for high pollutant loading include industrial areas and heavily traveled roads. Sediments and water must be disposed of in accordance with applicable waste disposal regulations. Coordinate disposal of solids and liquids as part of your maintenance procedure. Contact the local public works department to inquire how they disposes of their street waste residuals. 2 800.338.1122 www.contech-cpi.com©2007 CONTECH Stormwater Solutions Nothing in this catalog should be construed as an expressed warranty or an implied warranty of merchantability or fitness for any particular purpose. See the CONTECH standard quotation or acknowledgement for applicable warranties and other terms and conditions of sale. The product(s) described may be protected by one or more of the following US patents: 5,322,629; 5,624,576; 5,707,527; 5,759,415; 5,788,848; 5,985,157; 6,027,639; 6,350,374; 6,406,218; 6,641,720; 6,511,595; 6,649,048; 6,991,114; 6,998,038; 7,186,058; related foreign patents or other patents pending.e trademarks, registered trademarks, or licensed trademarks of CONTECH Construction Products Inc. MWS Linear Advanced Stormwater Biofiltration Contents 1 Introduction 2 Applications 3 Configurations 4 Advantages 5 Operation 6 Orientations | Bypass 7 Performance | Approvals 8 Sizing 9 Installation | Maintenance | Plants www.ModularWetlands.com The Urban Impact For hundreds of years natural wetlands surrounding our shores have played an integral role as nature’s stormwater treatment system. But as our cities grow and develop, these natural wet- lands have perished under countless roads, rooftops, and parking lots. Plant A Wetland Without natural wetlands our cities are deprived of water purification, flood control, and land stability. Modular Wetlands and the MWS Linear re-establish nature’s presence and rejuvenate water ways in urban areas. MWS Linear The Modular Wetland System Linear represents a pioneering breakthrough in stormwater tech- nology as the only biofiltration system to utilize patented horizontal flow, allowing for a smaller footprint and higher treatment capacity. While most biofilters use little or no pre-treatment, the MWS Linear incorporates an advanced pre-treatment chamber that includes separation and pre- filter cartridges. In this chamber sediment and hydrocarbons are removed from runoff before it enters the biofiltration chamber, in turn reducing maintenance costs and improving performance. Parking Lots Parking lots are designed to maximize space and the MWS Linear’s 4 ft. standard planter width al- lows for easy integration into parking lot islands and other landscape medians. Mixed Use The MWS Linear can be installed as a raised plant- er to treat runoff from rooftops or patios, making it perfect for sustainable “live-work” spaces. Industrial Many states enforce strict regulations for dis- charges from industrial sites. The MWS Linear has helped various sites meet difficult EPA mandated effluent limits for dissolved metals and other pol- lutants. Residential Low to high density developments can benefit from the versatile design of the MWS Linear. The system can be used in both decentralized LID de- sign and cost-effective end-of-the-line configura- tions. Streets Street applications can be challenging due to limited space. The MWS Linear is very adaptable, and offers the smallest footprint to work around the constraints of existing utilities on retrofit pro- jects. Commercial Compared to bioretention systems, the MWS Lin- ear can treat far more area in less space - meeting treatment and volume control requirements. Applications The MWS Linear has been successfully used on numerous new construction and retrofit projects. The system’s superior versatility makes it beneficial for a wide range of stormwater and waste water applications - treating rooftops, streetscapes, parking lots, and industrial sites. More applications are available on our website: www.ModularWetlands.com/Applications • Agriculture • Reuse • Low Impact Development • Waste Water www.ModularWetlands.com Configurations The MWS Linear is the preferred biofiltration system of Civil Engineers across the country due to its versatile design. This highly versatile system has available “pipe-in” options on most models, along with built-in curb or grated inlets for simple integration into your stormdrain design. Curb Type The Curb Type configuration accepts sheet flow through a curb opening and is commonly used along road ways and parking lots. It can be used in sump or flow by conditions. Length of curb opening varies based on model and size. Grate Type The Grate Type configuration offers the same features and benefits as the Curb Type but with a grated/drop inlet above the systems pre-treatment chamber. It has the added benefit of allowing for pedestrian access over the inlet. ADA compliant grates are available to assure easy and safe access. The Grate Type can also be used in scenarios where runoff needs to be intercepted on both sides of landscape islands. Downspout Type The Downspout Type is a variation of the Vault Type and is designed to accept a vertical downspout pipe from roof top and podium areas. Some models have the option of utilizing an internal bypass, simplifying the overall design. The system can be installed as a raised planter and the exterior can be stuccoed or covered with other finishes to match the look of adjacent buildings. Vault Type The system’s patented horizontal flow biofilter is able to accept inflow pipes directly into the pre-treatment chamber, meaning the MWS Linear can be used in end-of-the-line installations. This greatly improves feasibility over typical decentralized designs that are required with other biofiltration/bioretention systems. Another benefit of the “pipe in” design is the ability to install the system downstream of underground detention systems to meet water quality volume requirements. Page 3 Cartridge Housing Pre-filter Cartridge Curb Inlet Individual Media Filters Advantages & Operation The MWS Linear is the most efficient and versatile biofiltration system on the market, and the only system with horizontal flow which improves performance, reduces footprint, and minimizes maintenance. Figure-1 and Figure-2 illustrate the invaluable benefits of horizontal flow and the multiple treatment stages. • Horizontal Flow Biofiltration • Greater Filter Surface Area • Pre-Treatment Chamber • Patented Perimeter Void Area • Flow Control • No Depressed Planter Area Separation • Trash, sediment, and debris are separated before entering the pre-filter cartridges • Designed for easy maintenance access Pre-Filter Cartridges • Over 25 ft2 of surface area per cartridge • Utilizes BioMediaGREEN filter material • Removes over 80% of TSS & 90% of hydrocarbons • Prevents pollutants that cause clogging from migrating to the biofiltration chamber Pre-Treatment1 1 2 Drain-Down Line 1 2Vertical Underdrain Manifold Featured Advantages www.ModularWetlands.com Fig. 1 Horizontal Flow • Less clogging than downward flow biofilters • Water flow is subsurface • Improves biological filtration Patented Perimeter Void Area • Vertically extends void area between the walls and the WetlandMEDIA on all four sides. • Maximizes surface area of the media for higher treatment capacity WetlandMEDIA • Contains no organics and removes phosphorus • Greater surface area and 48% void space • Maximum evapotranspiration • High ion exchange capacity and light weight Flow Control • Orifice plate controls flow of water through WetlandMEDIA to a level lower than the media’s capacity. • Extends the life of the media and improves performance Drain-Down Filter • The Drain-Down is an optional feature that completely drains the pre-treatment chamber • Water that drains from the pre-treatment chamber between storm events will be treated 2x to 3x More Surface Area Than Traditional Downward Flow Bioretention Systems.Fig. 2 - Top View Biofiltration2 Discharge3 Perimeter Void A r e a 3 4 3Flow Control Riser Drain-Down Line Outlet Pipe Page 5 Orientations Bypass Internal Bypass Weir (Side-by-Side Only) The Side-By-Side orientation places the pre-treat- ment and discharge chambers adjacent to one an- other allowing for integration of internal bypass. The wall between these chambers can act as a by- pass weir when flows exceed the system’s treatment capacity, thus allowing bypass from the pre-treat- ment chamber directly to the discharge chamber. External Diversion Weir Structure This traditional offline diversion method can be used with the MWS Linear in scenarios where run- off is being piped to the system. These simple and effective structures are generally configured with two outflow pipes. The first is a smaller pipe on the upstream side of the diversion weir - to divert low flows over to the MWS Linear for treatment. The second is the main pipe that receives water once the system has exceeded treatment capacity and water flows over the weir. Flow By Design This method is one in which the system is placed just upstream of a standard curb or grate inlet to intercept the first flush. Higher flows simply pass by the MWS Linear and into the standard inlet down- stream. End-To-End The End-To-End orientation places the pre-treat- ment and discharge chambers on opposite ends of the biofiltration chamber therefore minimizing the width of the system to 5 ft (outside dimension). This orientation is perfect for linear projects and street retrofits where existing utilities and sidewalks limit the amount of space available for installation. One limitation of this orientation is bypass must be ex- ternal. Side-By-Side The Side-By-Side orientation places the pre-treat- ment and discharge chamber adjacent to one an- other with the biofiltration chamber running paral- lel on either side. This minimizes the system length, providing a highly compact footprint. It has been proven useful in situations such as streets with di- rectly adjacent sidewalks, as half of the system can be placed under that sidewalk. This orientation also offers internal bypass options as discussed below. This simple yet innovative diversion trough can be installed in existing or new curb and grate inlets to divert the first flush to the MWS Linear via pipe. It works similar to a rain gutter and is installed just below the opening into the inlet. It captures the low flows and channels them over to a connecting pipe exiting out the wall of the inlet and leading to the MWS Linear. The DVERT is perfect for retrofit and green street applications that allows the MWS Lin- ear to be installed anywhere space is available. DVERT Low Flow Diversion DVERT Trough www.ModularWetlands.com Rhode Island DEM Approved Approved as an authorized BMP and noted to achieve the following minimum removal efficiencies: 85% TSS, 60% Pathogens, 30% Total Phosphorus for discharges to freshwater systems, and 30% Total Nitrogen for discharges to saltwater or tidal systems. MASTEP Evaluation The University of Massachusetts at Amherst – Water Resources Research Center, issued a technical evaluation report noting removal rates up to 84% TSS, 70% Total Phosphorus, 68.5% Total Zinc, and more. Washington State DOE Approved The MWS Linear is approved for General Use Level Designation (GULD) for Basic, En- hanced, and Phosphorus treatment at 1 gpm/ft2 loading rate. The highest performing BMP on the market for all main pollutant categories. Approvals The MWS Linear has successfully met years of challenging technical reviews and testing from some of the most prestigious and demanding agencies in the nation, and perhaps the world. DEQ Assignment The Virginia Department of Environmental Quality assigned the MWS Linear, the highest phosphorus removal rating for manufactured treatment devices to meet the new Virginia Stormwater Management Program (VSMP) Technical Criteria. VA TSS Total Phosphorus Ortho Phosphorus Nitrogen Dissolved Zinc Dissolved Copper Total Zinc Total Copper Motor Oil 85%64%67%45%66%38%69%50%95% Performance The MWS Linear continues to outperform other treatment methods with superior pollutant removal for TSS, heavy metals, nutrients, hydrocarbons and bacteria. Since 2007 the MWS Linear has been field tested on nu- merous sites across the country. With it’s advanced pre-treatment chamber and innovative horizontal flow biofilter, the system is able to effectively remove pollutants through a combination of physical, chemical, and biological filtration processes. With the same biological processes found in natural wetlands, the MWS Linear harnesses natures ability to process, transform, and remove even the most harmful pollutants. Page 7 Treatment Flow Sizing Table Model #Dimensions WetlandMediaSurface Area Treatment Flow Rate (cfs) MWS-L-4-4 4’ x 4’23 ft2 0.052 MWS-L-4-6 4’ x 6’32 ft2 0.073 MWS-L-4-8 4’ x 8’50 ft2 0.115 MWS-L-4-13 4’ x 13’63 ft2 0.144 MWS-L-4-15 4’ x 15’76 ft2 0.175 MWS-L-4-17 4’ x 17’90 ft2 0.206 MWS-L-4-19 4’ x 19’103 ft2 0.237 MWS-L-4-21 4’ x 21’117 ft2 0.268 MWS-L-8-8 8’ x 8’100 ft2 0.230 MWS-L-8-12 8’ x 12’151 ft2 0.346 MWS-L-8-16 8’ x 16’201 ft2 0.462 Flow Based Sizing The MWS Linear can be used in stand alone applica- tions to meet treatment flow requirements. Since the MWS Linear is the only biofiltration system that can ac- cept inflow pipes several feet below the surface it can be used not only in decentralized design applications but also as a large central end-of-the-line application for maximum feasibility. Volume Based Sizing Many states require treatment of a water quality volume and do not offer the option of flow based design. The MWS Linear and its unique horizontal flow makes it the only biofilter that can be used in volume based design installed downstream of ponds, detention basins, and underground storage systems. Treatment Volume Sizing Table Model #Treatment Capacity (cu. ft.) @ 24-Hour Drain Down Treatment Capacity (cu. ft.) @ 48-Hour Drain Down MWS-L-4-4 1140 2280 MWS-L-4-6 1600 3200 MWS-L-4-8 2518 5036 MWS-L-4-13 3131 6261 MWS-L-4-15 3811 7623 MWS-L-4-17 4492 8984 MWS-L-4-19 5172 10345 MWS-L-4-21 5853 11706 MWS-L-8-8 5036 10072 MWS-L-8-12 7554 15109 MWS-L-8-16 10073 20145 www.ModularWetlands.com Installation The MWS Linear is simple, easy to install, and has a space efficient design that offers lower excavation and in- stallation costs compared to traditional tree-box type systems. The structure of the system resembles pre-cast catch basin or utility vaults and is installed in a similar fashion. The system is delivered fully assembled for quick in- stallation. Generally, the structure can be unloaded and set in place in 15 minutes. Our experienced team of field technicians are available to supervise installations and provide technical support. Plant Selection Abundant plants, trees, and grasses bring value and an aesthetic benefit to any urban setting, but those in the MWS Linear do even more - they increase pollutant removal. What’s not seen, but very important, is that below grade the stormwater runoff/flow is being subjected to nature’s secret weapon: a dynamic physical, chemi- cal, and biological process working to break down and remove non-point source pollutants. The flow rate is controlled in the MWS Linear, giving the plants more “contact time” so that pollutants are more successfully decomposed, volatilized and incorporated into the biomass of The MWS Linear’s micro/macro flora and fauna. A wide range of plants are suitable for use in the MWS Linear, but selec- tions vary by location and climate. View suitable plants by selecting the list relative to your project location’s hardy zone. Please visit www.ModularWetlands.com/Plants for more information and various plant lists. Maintenance Reduce your maintenance costs, man hours, and materials with the MWS Linear. Unlike other biofiltration systems that provide no pre-treatment, the MWS Linear is a self-contained treatment train which incorporates simple and effective pre-treatment. Maintenance requirements for the biofilter itself are almost completely eliminated, as the pre-treatment chamber removes and isolates trash, sediments, and hydrocarbons. What’s left is the simple maintenance of an easily accessible pre-treatment chamber that can be cleaned by hand or with a standard vac truck. Only periodic replacement of low- cost media in the pre-filter cartridges is required for long term opera- tion and there is absolutely no need to replace expensive biofiltration media. Page 9 www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Guidelines for Modular Wetland System - Linear Maintenance Summary o Remove Trash from Screening Device – average maintenance interval is 6 to 12 months.  (5 minute average service time). o Remove Sediment from Separation Chamber – average maintenance interval is 12 to 24 months.  (10 minute average service time). o Replace Cartridge Filter Media – average maintenance interval 12 to 24 months.  (10-15 minute per cartridge average service time). o Replace Drain Down Filter Media – average maintenance interval is 12 to 24 months.  (5 minute average service time). o Trim Vegetation – average maintenance interval is 6 to 12 months.  (Service time varies). System Diagram Access to screening device, separation chamber and cartridge filter Access to drain down filter Pre-Treatment Chamber Biofiltration Chamber Discharge Chamber Outflow Pipe Inflow Pipe (optional) www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Procedures Screening Device 1. Remove grate or manhole cover to gain access to the screening device in the Pre- Treatment Chamber. Vault type units do not have screening device. Maintenance can be performed without entry. 2. Remove all pollutants collected by the screening device. Removal can be done manually or with the use of a vacuum truck. The hose of the vacuum truck will not damage the screening device. 3. Screening device can easily be removed from the Pre-Treatment Chamber to gain access to separation chamber and media filters below. Replace grate or manhole cover when completed. Separation Chamber 1. Perform maintenance procedures of screening device listed above before maintaining the separation chamber. 2. With a pressure washer spray down pollutants accumulated on walls and cartridge filters. 3. Vacuum out Separation Chamber and remove all accumulated pollutants. Replace screening device, grate or manhole cover when completed. Cartridge Filters 1. Perform maintenance procedures on screening device and separation chamber before maintaining cartridge filters. 2. Enter separation chamber. 3. Unscrew the two bolts holding the lid on each cartridge filter and remove lid. 4. Remove each of 4 to 8 media cages holding the media in place. 5. Spray down the cartridge filter to remove any accumulated pollutants. 6. Vacuum out old media and accumulated pollutants. 7. Reinstall media cages and fill with new media from manufacturer or outside supplier. Manufacturer will provide specification of media and sources to purchase. 8. Replace the lid and tighten down bolts. Replace screening device, grate or manhole cover when completed. Drain Down Filter 1. Remove hatch or manhole cover over discharge chamber and enter chamber. 2. Unlock and lift drain down filter housing and remove old media block. Replace with new media block. Lower drain down filter housing and lock into place. 3. Exit chamber and replace hatch or manhole cover. www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Notes 1. Following maintenance and/or inspection, it is recommended the maintenance operator prepare a maintenance/inspection record. The record should include any maintenance activities performed, amount and description of debris collected, and condition of the system and its various filter mechanisms. 2. The owner should keep maintenance/inspection record(s) for a minimum of five years from the date of maintenance. These records should be made available to the governing municipality for inspection upon request at any time. 3. Transport all debris, trash, organics and sediments to approved facility for disposal in accordance with local and state requirements. 4. Entry into chambers may require confined space training based on state and local regulations. 5. No fertilizer shall be used in the Biofiltration Chamber. 6. Irrigation should be provided as recommended by manufacturer and/or landscape architect. Amount of irrigation required is dependent on plant species. Some plants may require irrigation. www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Procedure Illustration Screening Device The screening device is located directly under the manhole or grate over the Pre-Treatment Chamber. It’s mounted directly underneath for easy access and cleaning. Device can be cleaned by hand or with a vacuum truck. Separation Chamber The separation chamber is located directly beneath the screening device. It can be quickly cleaned using a vacuum truck or by hand. A pressure washer is useful to assist in the cleaning process. www.modularwetlands.com Cartridge Filters The cartridge filters are located in the Pre-Treatment chamber connected to the wall adjacent to the biofiltration chamber. The cartridges have removable tops to access the individual media filters. Once the cartridge is open media can be easily removed and replaced by hand or a vacuum truck. Drain Down Filter The drain down filter is located in the Discharge Chamber. The drain filter unlocks from the wall mount and hinges up. Remove filter block and replace with new block. www.modularwetlands.com Trim Vegetation Vegetation should be maintained in the same manner as surrounding vegetation and trimmed as needed. No fertilizer shall be used on the plants. Irrigation per the recommendation of the manufacturer and or landscape architect. Different types of vegetation requires different amounts of irrigation. www.modularwetlands.com Inspection Form Modular Wetland System, Inc. P. 760.433-7640 F. 760-433-3176 E. Info@modularwetlands.com For Office Use Only (city) (Zip Code)(Reviewed By) Owner / Management Company (Date) Contact Phone ( )_ Inspector Name Date / /Time AM / PM Weather Condition Additional Notes Yes Depth: Yes No Modular Wetland System Type (Curb, Grate or UG Vault):Size (22', 14' or etc.): Other Inspection Items: Storm Event in Last 72-hours? No Yes Type of Inspection Routine Follow Up Complaint Storm Office personnel to complete section to the left. 2972 San Luis Rey Road, Oceanside, CA 92058 P (760) 433-7640 F (760) 433-3176 Inspection Report Modular Wetlands System Is the filter insert (if applicable) at capacity and/or is there an accumulation of debris/trash on the shelf system? Does the cartridge filter media need replacement in pre-treatment chamber and/or discharge chamber? Any signs of improper functioning in the discharge chamber? Note issues in comments section. Chamber: Is the inlet/outlet pipe or drain down pipe damaged or otherwise not functioning properly? Structural Integrity: Working Condition: Is there evidence of illicit discharge or excessive oil, grease, or other automobile fluids entering and clogging theunit? Is there standing water in inappropriate areas after a dry period? Damage to pre-treatment access cover (manhole cover/grate) or cannot be opened using normal lifting pressure? Damage to discharge chamber access cover (manhole cover/grate) or cannot be opened using normal lifting pressure? Does the MWS unit show signs of structural deterioration (cracks in the wall, damage to frame)? Project Name Project Address Inspection Checklist CommentsNo Does the depth of sediment/trash/debris suggest a blockage of the inflow pipe, bypass or cartridge filter? If yes, specify which one in the comments section. Note depth of accumulation in in pre-treatment chamber. Is there a septic or foul odor coming from inside the system? Is there an accumulation of sediment/trash/debris in the wetland media (if applicable)? Is it evident that the plants are alive and healthy (if applicable)? Please note Plant Information below. Sediment / Silt / Clay Trash / Bags / Bottles Green Waste / Leaves / Foliage Waste:Plant Information No Cleaning Needed Recommended Maintenance Additional Notes: Damage to Plants Plant Replacement Plant Trimming Schedule Maintenance as Planned Needs Immediate Maintenance www.modularwetlands.com Maintenance Report Modular Wetland System, Inc. P. 760.433-7640 F. 760-433-3176 E. Info@modularwetlands.com For Office Use Only (city) (Zip Code)(Reviewed By) Owner / Management Company (Date) Contact Phone ( )_ Inspector Name Date / / Time AM / PM Weather Condition Additional Notes Site Map # Comments: 2972 San Luis Rey Road, Oceanside, CA 92058 P. 760.433.7640 F. 760.433.3176 Inlet and Outlet Pipe Condition Drain Down Pipe Condition Discharge Chamber Condition Drain Down Media Condition Plant Condition Media Filter Condition Long: MWS Sedimentation Basin Total Debris Accumulation Condition of Media 25/50/75/100 (will be changed @ 75%) Operational Per Manufactures' Specifications (If not, why?) Lat:MWS Catch Basins GPS Coordinates of Insert Manufacturer / Description / Sizing Trash Accumulation Foliage Accumulation Sediment Accumulation Type of Inspection Routine Follow Up Complaint Storm Storm Event in Last 72-hours? No Yes Office personnel to complete section to the left. Project Address Project Name Cleaning and Maintenance Report Modular Wetlands System Corrugated Metal Pipe Infiltration System Solutions Guide ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS 2 © 2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC Stormwater Solutions from Contech Selecting the Right Stormwater Solution Just Got Easier... It’s simple to choose the right stormwater solution to achieve your goals with the Contech Stormwater Solutions Staircase. First, select the runoff reduction practices that are most appropriate for your site, paying particular attention to pretreatment needs. If the entire design storm cannot be retained, select a treatment best management practice (BMP) for the balance. Finally, select a detention system to address any outstanding downstream erosion. Learn more about all of our stormwater technologies at www.ContechES.com/urbangreen Design Your own Detention or infiltration sYstemDYODS The Contech DYODS is an exclusive online design tool to that allows users to quickly and easily design their own detention or infiltration system. Just input your required storage volume to calculate the quantity of the material needed for your Contech CMP, CON/SPAN®, or ChamberMaxx® system. To use the Design Your Own Detention or Infiltration System tool, visit: www.ContechES.com/dyods 3 Learn more at www.ContechES.com/cmp-detention The only sure way to eliminate stormwater pollution is to eliminate stormwater runoff. In recognition of this fact, Green Infrastructure and Low Impact Development based stormwater management regulations prioritizing runoff reduction have proliferated throughout the United States. Where site conditions allow, infiltration is typically the most cost effective and reliable runoff reduction approach. In urban environments where there are competing demands for land, subsurface infiltration can provide many of the benefits of landscape based systems but without requiring dedicated land area. Infiltration systems are commonly comprised of a pretreatment component designed to remove sediment, trash, and oil, followed by plastic, metal or concrete storage units surrounded by permeable stone creating a high voids storage gallery. Infiltration systems are typically designed to support vehicular loading and to withstand lateral pressures from surrounding soil that allows the overlying land to be used for virtually any non-building application. Subsurface Infiltration as a Stormwater Management Strategy LID benefits include runoff volume reduction, peak flow control, ground water recharge, and water quality improvement. CMP infiltration is used at Pitzer College in Claremont, California. Subsurface infiltration meets the objectives of LID by reducing runoff with the added benefit of saving land space in urban environments. 4 CMP – the “Go To” Material for Subsurface Infiltration The purpose of the storage vessel is to hold stormwater runoff underground while allowing it to infiltrate the surrounding soil. For the majority of applications, corrugated metal pipe (CMP) is the “go to” material for subsurface infiltration. • A minimum of 75-year service life for most soil/water conditions. • Various pipe coatings and materials are available to accommodate site-specific needs and extend service life: Aluminized Steel Type 2 (ALT2), Galvanized, CORLIX® Aluminum, and Polymeric. • Wide range of gages, corrugations, and shapes, in diameters 12” – 144”. • Pipe can be fully or partially perforated for infiltration, retention, or groundwater recharge applications. • Custom access risers and manifolds provide direct access for maintenance. • Outlet control devices can be incorporated within the system, eliminating the need for a separate structure. • Customizable - a variety of fittings allow CMP to match most layout configurations. • May be designed for heavy loading and high maximum cover. • Contributes to LEED points. • Available locally; quick turnaround time. • The most economical installed solution. A wide range of CMP diameters and coatings are available to meet site specific needs. CMP can be laid out in configurations not achievable with other materials. With its low cost, a wide variety of diameters, layout configurations, and materials, no other material can match CMP’s flexibility and versatility. 5 Learn more at www.ContechES.com/cmp-detention Some engineers are hesitant to use corrugated metal pipe (CMP) for stormwater applications because they have read or heard about CMP being used in culverts that have corroded. This shouldn’t be the case. Many decades ago, galvanized pipe was the coating of choice for culverts; that now has been replaced with Aluminized Type 2 (ALT2). The primary reason for culvert failure is the galvanized coating was not properly designed to withstand a high flow and abrasive environment, which wears the galvanized coating off the invert of the pipe. The ALT2 is far more abrasive resistant for applications such as culverts and has a wider range for pH and resistivity. Additionally, a detention/infiltration application is not an abrasive environment, so these concerns are further mitigated. Finally, a properly designed infiltration system includes pretreatment and flow control, as well as a stone envelope which prevents interaction with native soils, further reducing the potential for abrasion and corrosion. • A minimum of 75 year service life for most soil/water conditions and has a proven service life that exceed 100 years with proper specification that meets all AASHTO and ASTM pipe specifications. • CMP infiltration systems can be designed to meet HS-20 or greater load requirements with proper depths of cover. • With no abrasion and low flows, coatings remain intact and protect against corrosion inside the pipe that holds stormwater runoff. • Protective pipe coatings and materials such as ALT2, Galvanized, Polymeric, and CORLIX® Aluminum are matched to the pH and resistivity of the surrounding soil. • CMP infiltration systems are surrounded by clean crushed rock to provide increased storage capacity. The entire system is wrapped with fabric on the sides and top to prevent the soils from having contact with CMP. Thus, corrosive soils do not come into contact with the pipe. Addressing the Question of Longevity CMP has a proven service life CMP infiltration systems have a proven service life that exceeds 100-years with proper specification that meets all AASHTO and ASTM pipe specifications. Learn more about the durability of steel through the recent NCSPA ALT2 Study - www.ncspa.org 6 Maximizing Vertical Space: Every Inch Counts One of the most overlooked advantages of CMP is its ability to maximize vertical storage space. Increasing the depth of a CMP infiltration system allows for more water storage in the same footprint. For example, doubling the diameter of pipe yields four times as much storage volume in the pipe. This provides a significant cost savings per cubic foot of storage. In addition, more vertical storage space means a smaller footprint, less excavation, and lower project costs. 2x the diameter - 4x the storage Diameter (inches)Volume (ft3/ft)Min. Cover Height Diameter (inches)Volume (ft3/ft)Min. Cover Height 12 .78 12”78 33.1 12” 15 1.22 12”84 38.4 12” 18 1.76 12”90 44.1 12” 21 2.40 12”96 50.2 12” 24 3.14 12”102 56.7 18” 30 4.9 12”108 63.6 18” 36 7.0 12”114 70.8 18” 42 9.6 12”120 78.5 18” 48 12.5 12”126 86.5 18” 54 15.9 12”132 95.0 18” 60 19.6 12”138 103.8 18” 66 23.7 12”144 113.1 18” 72 28.2 12” Round Pipe – CMP 6-in to 144-in Sizing 96” diameter - 50.2 ft³/ft 48” diameter - 12.5 ft³/ft Contech’s Corrugated Metal Pipe Detention systems maximize vertical storage space. 7 Learn more at www.ContechES.com/cmp-detention 7 Infiltration systems have multiple components, and one of the most important is pretreatment. The purpose of a pretreatment device is to prolong the life of the infiltration system by removing debris and sediment that can collect on the invert and within the stone backfill voids. Pretreatment will maintain the efficiency of an infiltration system as well as extend the life cycle, therefore preventing a premature replacement. Pretreatment also offers these additional benefits: • Easier to clean and maintain compared to the infiltration system itself. • Cost savings due to the extended service life of the system. • Removing trash and debris protects downstream outlet control structures from clogging. Pretreatment Design Considerations When choosing a pretreatment system, it is important to consider the following: • Downstream outlet control structures may require protection from a pretreatment device that screens trash and debris. • Pretreatment system selection depends on pollutant targets. Trash, debris, and larger particles can be removed with hydrodynamic separators. Removing high percentages of fine particles and associated heavy metals and nutrients requires filtration. • Reduced long term maintenance or replacement cost of the infiltration system can help justify pretreatment construction costs. • Inlet and pipe layout will influence the number and type of pretreatment systems used. A combination of different systems may be appropriate for the various inlet locations and flows. The Need for Effective Pretreatment Pretreatment systems that are easy to maintain and do not rely on the use of geotextile fabric are preferred. 8 Contech offers a number of pretreatment options, all of which will extend the life of subsurface infiltration systems and improve water quality. The type of system chosen will depend on a number of factors including footprint, soil conditions, local regulations, and the desired level of pretreatment. Pretreatment Options CDS provides direct access to cleaning, and the built-in high flow bypass weir eliminates the need for a separate bypass structure. Hydrodynamic Separation Hydrodynamic Separation (HDS) provides a basic level of pretreatment by capturing and retaining trash and debris, sediment, and oil from stormwater runoff. CDS® The CDS uses a combination of swirl concentration and indirect screening and is the only non-blocking screening technology available in an HDS system. Filtration Filtration provides a higher level of pretreatment and improved water quality by removing trash and debris, oil, fine solids, and dissolved pollutants such as metals, hydrocarbons, and nutrients. Filterra® Bioretention System Filterra is an engineered bioretention system that has been optimized for high volume/flow treatment and high pollutant removal. The Stormwater Management StormFilter® The StormFilter system is comprised of a structure that houses rechargeable, media-filled cartridges. The media can be customized to target site-specific pollutants. Jellyfish® Filter The Jellyfish filter uses membrane filtration in a compact footprint to remove a high level and a wide variety of stormwater pollutants such as fine particulates, oil, trash and debris, metals, and nutrients. 9 Learn more at www.ContechES.com/cmp-detention There may be instances where alternative materials are needed for subsurface infiltration due to site specific needs. Plastic Chambers Plastic chambers are best suited to shallow depth applications; minimum cover is 18 inches, and maximum cover is 96 inches. Some benefits of chambers are: • Chambers may be beneficial for sites with limited vertical storage. • Lightweight and installed by hand. • Heavy equipment is not required to set units into place. • Centralized stocking locations for short lead times. Concrete Structures/Vaults Some concrete structures and vaults are best suited for high loading applications such as railroads or airports. Concrete units are also ideal in corrosive environments or areas with high salinity. Some benefits of concrete structures are: • Wide range of spans and heights. • Greater underground infiltration storage in a smaller footprint. • Ample and easy maintenance access. • Fast installation. Alternative Materials for Subsurface Infiltration 10 Project Profiles: CMP Infiltration Systems in Action City Center Regional Stormwater Facility Mountlake Terrace, Washington • The city of Mountlake Terrace, Washington needed a new stormwater retention facility to provide stormwater treatment and downstream flood control. • There was limited footprint for 80,000 CF of runoff, and the system was required to be very deep, with about 15’ of cover. • Engineers designed a system consisting of a CDS pretreatment system in front of 800 linear feet of 120” diameter, perforated, aluminized type 2 CMP that allows the runoff to slowly infiltrate the surrounding soil. • Perforated CMP was selected for its ability to accommodate the deep bury, the relatively small footprint, and cost effectiveness. Creative Office Space El Segundo, California • A stormwater infiltration solution was needed for a new group of office buildings. • The owner wanted to maximize the use of the parking area in the urban setting. • The site had a tight footprint and multiple utility constraints, requiring the design of five separate systems. • A total of 860 LF of perforated CMP was installed providing of 25,265 CF of storage. • Perforated CMP was selected for its design flexibility, cost effectiveness, and ease of installation. Edie and Lew Wasserman Building, UCLA Westwood, California • The new six-story, 100,000 square foot Edie and Lew Wasserman Building was built on a very dense site that needed to meet sustainability requirements. • The design needed to maximize infiltration volume, match existing inverts, and work around existing utilities. • The stormwater management systems included a CDS pretreatment system and a CMP infiltration system using 57’ of 72” perforated CMP. • Perforated CMP was selected to avoid utilities, minimize excavation, meet the City of LA LID requirements, contribute to the building’s LEED certification, and to provide space for the buildings “outdoor room” and gardens. 11 Learn more at www.ContechES.com/cmp-detention The Right Partner Can Make All the Difference Regardless of your project’s objectives and constraints, our team of stormwater design engineers, regulatory managers, and local stormwater consultants are here to provide you with expert advice and assistance. If your goal is to eliminate or detain runoff, you can rely on Contech for a wide range of subsurface infiltration, detention, and rainwater harvesting solutions. If treatment is needed, our landscape-based biofiltration or subsurface filtration designs can fit into virtually any site and can be tailored to address specific pollutants. At every stage of your project, count on Contech to provide engineering services including: • Regulatory guidance and permitting assistance • Preliminary standard details and/or site specific final CAD drawings and specifications • Low Impact Development design assistance • Engineering calculations for hydraulics/hydrology, rainwater harvesting, and detention/retention • Online “Design Your Own” tools • Review of preliminary site design, feasibility screening, and layout assistance • Value engineering – cost estimates and options analysis • Pre-construction support, project scheduling, and contractor coordination • Installation and construction support • Maintenance support: »Guidance manuals »Demonstrations »Qualified contractor identification The result: an efficient design process, the right product, greater land space savings, and faster permitting. The entire Contech stormwater team welcomes the opportunity to work with you on your stormwater projects. To get started, please visit www.conteches.com/localresources or call us at 800-338-1122. We print our brochures entirely on Forest Stewardship Council certified paper. FSC certification ensures that the paper in our brochures contain fiber from well- managed and responsibly harvested forests that meet strict environmental and socioeconomic standards. FSC CMP Infiltration Bro (5M as of 1/15) PDF 10/15 NOTHING IN THIS CATALOG SHOULD BE CONSTRUED AS AN EXPRESSED WARRANTY OR AN IMPLIED WARRANTY OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR ANY PARTICULAR PURPOSE. SEE THE CONTECH STANDARD CONDITION OF SALES (VIEWABLE AT WWW.CONTECHES.COM/COS) FOR MORE INFORMATION. ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS ©2015 Contech Engineered Solutions LLC 800-338-1122 | www.ContechES.com All Rights Reserved. Printed in the USA. Get Social With Us! ENGINEERED SOLUTIONS Pipe Solutions Meeting project needs for durability, hydraulics, corrosion resistance, and stiffness • Corrugated Metal Pipe (CMP) • Steel Reinforced Polyethylene (SRPE) • High Density Polyethylene (HDPE) • Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) Treatment Solutions Helping to satisfy stormwater management requirements on land development projects • Stormwater Treatment • Detention/Infiltration • Rainwater Harvesting • Biofiltration/Bioretention Structures Solutions Providing innovative options and support for crossings, culverts, and bridges • Plate, Precast & Truss bridges • Hard Armor • Retaining Walls • Tunnel Liner Plate COMPLETE SITE SOLUTIONS Links to Stormwater Tools: To use the Land Value Calculator, visit: www.ContechES.com/lvc (Look under the Stormwater Management section to download the Land Value Calculator) To use the Design Your Own Detention System tool, visit: www.ContechES.com/dyods To use the Design Your Own Hydrodynamic Separator tool, visit: www.ContechES.com/dyohds To use the Rainwater Harvesting Runoff Reduction Calculator tool, visit: www.ContechES.com/rwh-calculator To use the LID Site Planner , visit: www.ContechES.com/LIDsiteplanner Dig Deeper Find all the information you need at www.ContechES.com, including field and laboratory test results, approvals, brochures, design guides, standard details, and specifications within the product section of our site. Connect with Us We're here to make your job easier – and that includes being able to get in touch with us when you need to. Go to www.ContechES.com/ConnectWithContech. While you’re there, be sure to check out our upcoming seminar schedule or request an in-house technical presentation. Start a Project If you are ready to begin a project, contact your local representative to get started. Or you can check out our design toolbox for all our online resources at www.ContechES.com/designtoolbox. Maintenance Underground storm water detention and retention systems should be inspected at regular intervals and maintained when necessary to ensure optimum performance. The rate at which the system collects pollutants will depend more heavily on site activities than the size or configuration of the system. Inspection Inspection is the key to effective maintenance and is easily performed. CONTECH recommends ongoing quarterly inspections of the accumulated sediment. Sediment deposition and transport may vary from year to year and quarterly inspections will help insure that systems are cleaned out at the appropriate time. Inspections should be performed more often in the winter months in climates where sanding operations may lead to rapid accumulations, or in equipment washdown areas. It is very useful to keep a record of each inspection. A sample inspection log is included for your use. Systems should be cleaned when inspection reveals that accumulated sediment or trash is clogging the discharge orifice. CONTECH suggests that all systems be designed with an access/inspection manhole situated at or near the inlet and the outlet orifice. Should it be necessary to get inside the system to perform maintenance activities, all appropriate precautions regarding confined space entry and OSHA regulations should be followed. Cleaning Maintaining an underground detention or retention system is easiest when there is no flow entering the system. For this reason, it is a good idea to schedule the cleanout during dry weather. Accumulated sediment and trash can typically be evacuated through the manhole over the outlet orifice. If maintenance is not performed as recommended, sediment and trash may accumulate in front of the outlet orifice. Manhole covers should be securely seated following cleaning activities. Priority Project Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) Jefferson Stadium Park     JPI Real Estate Acquisition LLC  Attachment C  JPI WQMP Report  Page 50 Attachment C Geotechnical Report  GEOTECHNICAL EXPLORATION REPORT PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT VACANT PROPERTY AT THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD AND GENE AUTRY WAY ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA Prepared for JPI Real Estate Acquisition 11975 El Camino Real, Suite 205 San Diego, California 92081 Project No. 11091.001 September 15, 2015 September 15, 2015 Project No. 11091.001 JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC 11975 El Camino Real, Suite 205 San Diego, California 92081 Attention: Ms. Rosie Cooper Subject: Geotechnical Exploration Report Proposed Residential Development Vacant Property at the Southwest Corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way Anaheim, California Leighton and Associates, Inc. (Leighton) is pleased to submit this geotechnical exploration report for a 17-acre vacant property located at the southwestern corner of Stage College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way in the City of Anaheim, California. Based on a review of the conceptual site plan prepared by Architects Orange, dated September 8, 2015, the proposed project is to develop the site, known as the Jefferson Stadium Park to a 1,208-unit apartment complex. The current plan depicts 5 apartment buildings (in three phases), each 4 to 5 stories in height. Two six-level and one three- level (one subterranean level and two levels above grade) parking structures are currently planned for the project. In addition, carriage buildings and leasing offices, and retail spaces are also planned for the site. Other amenities planned include a 1.2-acre park, club house, recreational areas, and roof lounges. Results of our exploration suggested that the development of the project for its intended use is feasible. This report summarizes our findings and preliminary recommendations with respect to site grading, foundation design, and the associated development for the project. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 2 Leighton appreciates the opportunity of service to JPI Real Estate Acquisition, LLC. Please do not hesitate to contact the undersigned should you question or need additional information. Respectfully submitted, LEIGHTON AND ASSOCIATES, INC. Jeff M. Pflueger, PG, CEG 2499 Associate Geologist Ext. 4257, Jpflueger@leightongroup.com Vincent P. Ip, PE, GE 2522 Senior Principal Engineer Ext. 1682, vip@leightongroup.com JMP/VPI/gv Distribution: (1) Addressee Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 i TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................. 1 1.1 Site and Project Description ....................................................................... 1 1.2 Scope of Work ........................................................................................... 1 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING ..................................... 2 2.1 Field Exploration ........................................................................................ 2 2.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing ............................................................... 3 2.3 Percolation Testing Results ....................................................................... 3 3.0 GEOLOGIC AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS ................................................ 4 3.1 Geologic Setting ........................................................................................ 4 3.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions ........................................................................ 5 3.2.1 Strength Characteristics .................................................................. 6 3.2.2 Compressibility Potential ................................................................. 6 3.2.3 Expansive Soils ............................................................................... 6 3.2.4 Corrosivity ....................................................................................... 6 3.3 Groundwater Conditions ............................................................................ 7 4.0 SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS ............................................................... 7 4.1 Faulting ...................................................................................................... 7 4.2 Ground Motion Study ................................................................................. 8 4.3 Liquefaction Potential................................................................................. 8 4.4 Seismically-Induced Settlement ................................................................. 8 4.5 Seismically-Induced Landslides ................................................................. 9 4.6 Flooding ..................................................................................................... 9 4.7 Seiches and Tsunamis............................................................................... 9 5.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS ...................................................................... 10 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS ...................................................................................... 10 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations ............................................................... 11 6.2 Site Grading ............................................................................................. 11 6.3 Foundation Design ................................................................................... 13 6.4 Slab-on-Grade ......................................................................................... 15 6.5 Concrete Flatwork .................................................................................... 16 6.6 Temporary Excavations ........................................................................... 16 6.7 Temporary Shoring .................................................................................. 17 6.8 Earth Retaining Structures ....................................................................... 19 6.9 Cast-in-Place Concrete Pile Construction ................................................ 21 6.10 Corrosion Protection Measures ............................................................... 21 Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 ii 6.11 Surface Drainage ..................................................................................... 22 6.12 Geotechnical Services During Construction ............................................. 22 7.0 LIMITATIONS ..................................................................................................... 23 Important Information About your Geotechnical Engineering Report List of Illustrations Figure 1 – Site Location Map Rear of Text Figure 2 – Boring Location Map Rear of Text Figure 3 – Regional Geology Map Rear of Text Figure 4 – Historical Seismicity and Regional Fault Map Rear of Text Figure 5 – Seismic Hazards Map Rear of Text Figure 6 – Drilled Caisson Capacity Curve Rear of Text Appendices Appendix A – References Appendix B – Boring Logs Appendix C – Results of Geotechnical Laboratory Testing Appendix D – Percolation Data Results Appendix E – Seismic Design Analysis Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Site and Project Description The site is located southwest of the intersection of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way (Figure 1, Site Location Map). The subject property is bound to the north by Gene Autry Way, to the west by commercial buildings, to the east by State College Boulevard, and to the south by Artisan Court and a 5 story multi- family residential complex. The latitude and longitude of the site is 33.7989° and -117.8902°, respectively. The site is relatively flat with the existing ground surface at an elevation of between approximately 143 and 146 feet above mean sea level (msl). Based on a review of historical aerial photos, the site was previously developed as a commercial space until 2012, when all of the buildings were demolished. Several of the former building foot prints have been stockpiled with gravel to approximately 3.5 feet in height. Based on review of the conceptual site plan by Architects Orange dated July 21, 2015, the proposed development consists of five 3- to 5-story apartment buildings, three multi-level parking structures, and associated office facilities, community park, recreational areas, courtyards, roadways and concrete flatwork. 1.2 Scope of Work Our scope of work for this updated geotechnical exploration consisted of the following tasks:  Review of readily available published geotechnical and geological literature pertinent to the site and its vicinity, including previous geotechnical exploration reports for the project site (Southern California Geotechnical, 2005) and previous inspection and environmental reports (Southwest Inspection & Testing, Inc., 2008). References used in preparation of this report are listed in Appendix A.  Coordinate with Underground Service Alert (USA) to clear known underground utilities at the proposed locations.  Drill and sample six exploratory soil borings to a maximum depth of 71.5 feet below ground surface (bgs). The borings were placed between previously drilled borings to supplement existing data. Three of the borings were Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 2 converted to temporary percolation test wells. The percolation tests were performed in general conformance with the procedures outlined in the Orange County Technical Guidance Document for Project Water Quality Management Plans.  Perform laboratory tests on representative soil samples to evaluate geotechnical engineering properties of subsurface materials. Laboratory testing included in-situ moisture content, sieve analysis, percent passing #200 screen, maximum dry density and optimum moisture content, direct shear, consolidation testing, collapse potential, sand equivalent, and corrosion testing (soluble sulfate, soluble chloride, pH and minimum resistivity).  Perform an engineering evaluation of the geotechnical data to develop recommendations for design and construction.  Prepare this updated report to present our findings, conclusions and recommendations. This geotechnical exploration report was prepared in accordance with the 2013 California Building Code (CBC). 2.0 FIELD EXPLORATION AND LABORATORY TESTING 2.1 Field Exploration A geotechnical exploration was performed previously at the site during April of 2005 by Southern California Geotechnical (SCG, 2005). The investigation consisted of drilling 8 exploratory soil borings to depths ranging from 30 to 60 feet bgs. They encountered 3 to 6 feet of artificial fill that generally consisted of loose silty fine sands with trace amounts of clay, overlying alluvial materials. The alluvium generally consisted of loose to medium dense fine sands, stiff silts and silty sands. Our field exploration was performed on July 21 and 22, 2015 and consisted of drilling, logging, and sampling of six hollow-stem auger borings (LB-1 through LB-3, and LP-1 through LP-3) to depths between 13 to 71.5 feet bgs. Groundwater was not encountered during drilling. Following completion of drilling and sampling, three of the borings (LP-1 through LP-3) were converted to temporary percolation wells. A summary of percolation test results are Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 3 presented in a subsequent section. The approximate locations of all exploratory borings are shown on Figure 2, Boring Location Map. 2.2 Geotechnical Laboratory Testing During previous field explorations, geotechnical laboratory tests were performed on selected soil samples. The testing program consisted of testing selected representative specimens, in general accordance with applicable ASTM standards, of the earth materials to obtain the following properties and characteristics:  In-situ moisture content (ASTM D2216);  Particle size analyses (ASTM D422 and ASTM D6913);  Direct Shear (ASTM D 3080);  One-Dimensional Consolidation (ASTM D 2435)  Atterberg Limits (ASTM D5333)  Collapse Potential (ASTM D4829);  Maximum Density and Optimum Moisture Content (ASTM D1557); and  Soluble sulfate, soluble chloride, pH and minimum resistivity. The results of the in-situ moisture and dry density tests are shown on the boring logs in Appendix B. Results of other laboratory tests are presented in Appendix C. 2.3 Percolation Testing Results Three In-situ percolation tests were performed at the site. Testing procedures were performed in general accordance with the Orange County Technical Guidance Document for Project Water Quality Management Plans (Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, 2013). Borings LP-1, LP-2, and LP-3 were drilled to 10 feet, 25 feet, and 15 feet, respectively. Upon completion of drilling and sampling, the borings were converted to temporary percolation test wells upon completion of drilling and sampling (Figure 2, Boring Location Map). A 5-foot section of a 2-inch-diameter perforated PVC pipe connected to a 2-inch diameter blank PVC casing was placed in each well. Pea gravel was filled into the annulus of the boring in the screened interval of each temporary percolation well. The percolation wells were pre-soaked prior to the testing. The water level in each well dropped more than 6 inches in 25 minutes for two consecutive Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 4 readings; therefore, the test procedures for coarse grained soils were followed. After the conclusion of the percolation test, the PVC pipe was removed. The test hole was then backfilled with excess soil cuttings. Remaining excess soil cuttings were spread on-site. The test was performed to measure the percolation rate of the soils within the bottom 5 feet of each well. The percolation rate was then converted to infiltration rate by dividing the flow quantity by the flow area for each time interval. Refer to the percolation test data provided in Appendix D – Percolation Test Results. A summary table for the unfactored percolation rate is presented below. TABLE 1 - SUMMARY OF PERCOLATION TESTS Test Hole ID Date Tested Test Interval (ft bgs) USCS Classification Infiltration Rate (in/hr) LP-1 7/22/15 5 - 10 SP Sand 1.67 LP-2 7/22/15 20 - 25 SP Sand 3.28 LP-3 7/22/15 10 - 15 SP Sand 11.20 It should be emphasized that the percolation test results are only representative of the tested location and depth where they are performed. Varying subsurface conditions will exist outside of the test location, which could alter the calculated infiltration rate indicated above. The test was performed using relatively clean water free of particulates and silt. The infiltration rate should be anticipated to decline over time due to accumulation of particulates in the infiltrative layer. 3.0 GEOLOGIC AND SUBSURFACE CONDITIONS 3.1 Geologic Setting The site lies near the lower reaches of the Santa Ana River and associated floodplain. Located approximately 2,000 feet east of the site is an area of groundwater recharge within the Santa Ana River channel. The surface distribution of Holocene sediments, as recorded in early editions of regional soil survey maps (Eckmann and others, 1919) suggests that the Santa Ana River has recently wandered back and forth across the Coastal Plain from Alamitos Bay to Newport Bay. Historical accounts and aerial photos (Troxell, 1938) further support the process of widespread sheet flooding being the dominant Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 5 depositional process associated with the Santa Ana River floodplain prior to the construction of Prado Dam in 1941 (California Department of Water Resources, 1957) and subsequent construction of concrete lining along the lower reaches of the Santa Ana River channel. Generally, the near-surface Quaternary age, young alluvial soils below the site are characterized as massive, loose to medium dense to dense, silty fine grained sands with varying proportions of silt and clay, to thinly bedded, soft to stiff, laminated silt and clay with occasional thin beds of predominately fine grained sands. The deeper alluvial fan sediments below the site generally consist of dense, fine to coarse grained gravelly sands with thin beds of well indurated, hard silts and clays. 3.2 Subsurface Soil Conditions Based on a review of published geologic maps and on soils encountered during our subsurface investigation, the site is underlain by undocumented artificial fill and Quaternary age young alluvial fan deposits (Morton and Miller, 2006; Figure 3 Regional Geology Map). The soil units encountered during our subsurface investigation are described below. Artificial Fill, Undocumented: (Afu) The artificial fill materials encountered at the site consist primarily of yellow brown to light brown, loose, clayey sand, silty sand, sand, and sandy silt materials. The fill materials range in thickness between from approximately 4 to 9 feet across the site at the explored locations. The fill materials were likely placed during grading and construction of the preexisting commercial tilt up buildings which took place between approximately 1972 and 1980 (NETR, 2015). In addition, 3 to 4 feet of additional fill materials that are composed of materials consistent with crushed miscellaneous base (CMB) were imported to the site during approximately July 2008 and stockpiled over the former building pad areas. Quaternary Young Alluvial Fan Deposits: (Qyf) The Quaternary age young alluvial fan deposits encountered in the borings consist of light brown to olive brown, firm to stiff, silt and loose medium dense silty sand and friable sand with varying amounts of fine and coarse subangular gravel. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 6 More detailed descriptions of the subsurface soils encountered at the site are presented on the boring logs in Appendix B. A brief description of the engineering characteristics of the subsurface soil is presented below. 3.2.1 Strength Characteristics Based on laboratory testing results and recorded blow counts, the undisturbed onsite soils exhibit adequate shear strength to provide support for the proposed improvements. 3.2.2 Compressibility Potential The blow count records and consolidation test results suggested that the onsite undisturbed soils exhibit low to moderate compressibility characteristics when subjected to the anticipated loading from the proposed improvements. Based on the laboratory test results the potential for soils to hydro-collapse is considered low. 3.2.3 Expansive Soils The alluvial soils onsite are predominantly sands and silty sands; therefore, the soils are expected to have a very low expansion potential per ASTM D 4829. 3.2.4 Corrosivity As a screening for potentially corrosive soil, a representative soil sample was tested during our study to determine minimum resistivity, chloride content, and pH. The test results are included in Appendix C of this report and are summarized in the following table. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 7 Test Results General Classification of Hazard Water-Soluble Sulfate in Soil (ppm) 96 to 131 Low Sulfate Exposure on Concrete Water-Soluble Chloride in Soil (ppm) 30 to 31 Low Chloride Exposure on Concrete pH 7.5 to 8.02 Neutral Minimum Resistivity (saturated, ohm-cm) 3,125 to 5,350 Corrosive to Buried Metals Based on the test results, the onsite soils are not expected to pose a significant potential for sulfate reaction with concrete. However, the onsite soils are considered corrosive to ferrous metals. 3.3 Groundwater Conditions Groundwater was not encountered during our field exploration to the total depth drilled of 71.5 feet bgs. Based on the current proposed residential development scheme, groundwater is not expected to pose a constraint during construction. According to groundwater information obtained through the California Geological Survey (CGS) in the vicinity of the site, historically shallowest groundwater depth is greater than 50 feet bgs (CGS, 1997). Based on groundwater data presented in this report, seasonal fluctuations in groundwater elevations should be anticipated over time. Local perched groundwater conditions or surface seepage may develop once site development is completed and stormwater infiltration and landscape irrigation commences. 4.0 SEISMIC AND GEOLOGIC HAZARDS 4.1 Faulting Based on our review of the available literature, no known active or potentially active faults traverse the site, and the site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone (CGS, 1986; Bryant and Hart, 2007). The locations of the closest active faults to the site were generated using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) website (USGS, 2008b). The closest active fault to the site is the Puente Hills Blind Thrust fault which is located approximately 5.3 Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 8 miles from the site. Other major active faults near the site include the San Joaquin Hills Blind Thrust, Newport-Inglewood Fault Zone, and the Elsinore Fault Zone, which are located approximately 7.3, 9.1 and 10.3 miles from the site, respectively. Considering the locations of these faults relative to the site, the potential for surface fault rupture occurrence at the site is considered low. Other nearby faults with respect to the site are shown on Figure 4, Historic Seismicity and Regional Fault Map. 4.2 Ground Motion Study Principal seismic hazard that could affect the site is ground shaking resulting from an earthquake occurring along several major active or potentially active faults in southern California. The site is expected to experience moderate to strong ground shaking resulted from the earthquake faults in the region. Using the United States Geological Survey (USGS) (http://geohazards.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps) seismic design maps and tools application, the Peak Ground Acceleration (PGA) for the site was calculated at 0.502g. The modal earthquake is a Magnitude 7 earthquake with a distance of 9.0 miles from the site. The ground motion study and results are included in Appendix E. 4.3 Liquefaction Potential Liquefaction is the loss of soil strength or stiffness due to increasing pore-water pressure during severe ground shaking. Liquefaction is associated primarily with loose (low density), saturated, fine- to medium-grained, cohesionless soils. The site is not mapped within an area prone to liquefaction as shown on the State of California Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle (CGS, 1998), see Figure 5, Seismic Hazard Map. Groundwater was not encountered during our exploration to a depth of 71.5 feet; therefore, based on these considerations the potential for liquefaction occurring at the site is considered low. 4.4 Seismically-Induced Settlement Strong ground motion during earthquakes tends to rearrange looser soils particles into a more compact arrangement, especially in granular soil deposits. The cumulative effects of soil particles rearrangement during an earthquake will result in settlement of the soil column. In general, a poorly graded granular Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 9 deposit is more susceptible to settlement than a fine-grained or well-graded soil. Earthquake-induced settlement occurs in soil column both above and below groundwater. Earthquake-induced settlement calculations were performed in the computer program Cliq in conjunction with the liquefaction analysis. Based on our analysis, the earthquake-induced settlement was estimated to be on the order of 1 inch for the site. The seismically-induced differential settlement may be assumed to be on the order of one-half of the total settlement over a horizontal distance of 40 feet. The results of the analysis are also included in Appendix E. 4.5 Seismically-Induced Landslides The project site is not mapped as an area susceptible to seismically-induced landslide on the Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle (CGS, 1998) as shown on Figure 5, Seismic Hazard Map. The topography of the site is relatively flat. Therefore, the potential of landslides at the site is considered nil. 4.6 Flooding The project site is not located within a flood hazard zone as by FEMA flood maps (https://msc.fema.gov/portal). Earthquake-induced flooding can be caused by failure of dams or other water-retaining structures as a result of an earthquake. Based on our review of dam inundation and topographic maps, the site is not located within a dam inundation area. Therefore, the risk of seismically-induced flooding due to dam failure is considered low. 4.7 Seiches and Tsunamis Seiches are large waves generated in enclosed bodies of water in response to ground shaking. Tsunamis are waves generated in large bodies of water by fault displacement or major ground movement. Based on the lack of nearby enclosed water bodies and the inland location of the site, seiche and tsunami risks at the site are considered negligible. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 10 5.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS No evidence of adverse geological or geotechnical hazards was noted at the site that will preclude the development of the project. Presented below is a summary of findings based upon the results of our geotechnical evaluation of the site:  The site is not located within an area shown as susceptible to liquefaction on the California Seismic Hazard Zones Map for the Anaheim Quadrangle. The potential for liquefaction and the likelihood of earthquake-induced ground failures related to soil liquefaction or cyclic softening is low.  The onsite undisturbed soils exhibit adequate strength and low compressibility characteristics when subjected to the anticipated loading of the proposed improvements.  Based on field observation and comparison of laboratory test results to California Building Code guidelines for expansive soils (CBC, 2013), the near surface onsite soils will likely exhibit very low expansion potential when subjected to increase in moisture.  Concrete in contact with the near surface onsite soil is expected to have low exposure to water-soluble sulfates and low exposure to chloride in the soil. The onsite soil is considered corrosive to ferrous metal.  The subsurface soils are anticipated to be readily excavated using conventional earthmoving equipment in good working condition. 6.0 RECOMMENDATIONS The following recommendations have been developed based on the exhibited engineering properties of the onsite soils and their anticipated behavior both during and after construction. Recommendations are specifically provided for design of foundation, at-grade floor slabs, concrete flatwork, and other incidental improvements associated with this project. The geotechnical engineer should review the grading plan, foundation plans, and specifications when they are available to verify that the recommendations presented in this report have been properly interpreted and incorporated. Furthermore, the actual subsurface conditions should be verified for consistence with those encountered within our exploratory borings during construction. Recommendations in this report may be revised, if necessary. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 11 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations Moderate to strong ground shaking due to seismic activity is expected at the site during the life span of the project. The following are the current code-based and site-specific seismic design parameters for new structures: Categorization/Coefficients Code-Based (1) (2) Site Longitude (decimal degrees) West -117.8902 Site Latitude (decimal degrees) North 33.7989 Site Class (§1613.3.2) D Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, Ss (Figure 1613.3(1)) 1.492 Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration at 1s Period, S1 (Figure 1613.3(2)) 0.543 Short Period Site Coefficient at 0.2s Period, Fa (Table 1613.3.3(1)) 1.0 Long Period Site Coefficient at 1s Period, Fv (Table 1613.3.3(2)) 1.5 Adjusted Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, SMS 1.492 Adjusted Spectral Response Acceleration at 1s Period, SM1 0.814 Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 0.2s Period, SDS 0.995 Design Spectral Response Acceleration at 1s Period, SD1 0.543 1. All were derived from the USGS web page: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php 2. All coefficients in units of g (spectral acceleration) 6.2 Site Grading Site Preparation - Prior to construction, debris and other unsuitable materials at the site should be completely removed and disposed of accordingly. The existing artificial fill materials, including the stockpiled CMB materials are not suitable to use to provide support for the new buildings and other improvements in their current condition. However, the materials free of debris or other deleterious materials may be reused as fill material during future grading. Efforts should be made to locate any existing or abandoned utility lines in the area. Existing utility conduits should be removed or rerouted if they interfere with the proposed construction, and the resulting cavities should be properly backfilled and compacted. Overexcavation and Recompaction – The subgrade soils will consist of mostly silty fine sands. To provide a uniform support for the foundations and at-grade floor slabs, it is recommended that the top 2 to 4 feet of the exposed subgrade immediately below the bearing subgrade of the new foundations (See Section 6.3 for specific recommendations) and at-grade floor slabs be overexcavated and Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 12 moisture-conditioned to three percent above optimum and recompacted to at least 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM D1557. Recompaction should extend laterally where possible to a distance equal to the depth of the excavation below the foundation. Areas outside the proposed building area that are planned for incidental improvements, such as access ramps and hardscape, should be overexcavated to a minimum of 1 foot below the bearing subgrade of the planned improvements. The overexcavation should extend horizontally to a distance equal to the depth of the excavation below the finish subgrade. The actual depth and extent of recompaction should be determined at the time of construction by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Subgrade Preparation – To provide a uniform supporting subgrade for placing fill or construction of other improvements, the excavation bottom should be observed and evaluated by Leighton to verify competent soil is exposed. The subgrade surface should then be scarified to a depth of six inches, moisture- conditioned to three percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent of the ASTM D1557 laboratory maximum density. Fill Placement and Compaction – The onsite soil, free of organic material, debris, and oversize materials (greater than 6 inches in largest dimension), is suitable to be used in general fills. Clayey soils are considered expansive and are not suitable for use under building area. If import soil is needed for the project, it should be evaluated and tested by the geotechnical consultant before delivery to the site. In general, import material should be non-organic and free of debris or other deleterious materials, and low in expansion potential with an Expansion Index less than 20. All fill soil should be placed in thin, loose lifts less than 8 inches thick, moisture-conditioned as necessary to approximately two to three percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted using appropriate equipment to the minimum of 90 percent relative compaction as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. Further, base material should be compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction. Utility Trench Backfill – The utility trench subgrade should be firm and unyielding and should be observed and tested by the geotechnical consultant prior to placing pipe bedding materials. The bedding materials should be compacted free draining sand, gravel, or crushed rock. If sand is used, the sand should have a sand equivalent greater than 30. Pipe bedding should extend below the Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 13 pipe to a depth in accordance with the pipe manufacturer’s specifications. The pipe bedding material should extend to at least 12 inches over the top of the pipe. Trench excavations above the pipe bedding may be backfilled with suitable onsite soils under the observation of the geotechnical consultant. All fill soils should be placed in loose lifts, moisture-conditioned to two to three percent above optimum moisture content, and compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction, as determined by ASTM Test Method D1557. Lift thickness will be dependent on the equipment used as suggested in the latest edition of the Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (SSPWC). The fill soils should extend to the bottom of the base course for any new pavement. Base material should be moisture-conditioned between optimum and two percent above optimum moisture and compacted to a minimum of 95 percent relative compaction based on ASTM D1557. All compaction should be performed by mechanical means. Jetting of trench backfill is not recommended. 6.3 Foundation Design No structural loading information is available at this time. The following three foundations system (either one system or a combination of systems) are all feasible for the project. It is recommended that the geotechnical engineer be consulted in selecting the foundation schemes when the structural loading information for the buildings becomes available. Conventional Shallow Foundation System A conventional shallow foundation system consisting of isolated column footings and continuous wall foundation should be established on at least 2 feet of engineered fill prepared as recommended in Section 6.2 of this report may be used to support the apartment buildings. For foundations associated with the new parking structures, the engineered fill thickness should be increased to 4 feet. The foundations should be at least 2 feet wide and embedded 18 inches below lowest adjacent grade. A maximum allowable bearing pressure of 2,600 pounds per square foot (psf) and 3,250 psf may be used to design a continuous wall foundation up to 8 feet wide and an isolated column footing up to 10 feet square. The total and differential settlements under the recommended bearing pressure are estimated to be less than 1 inch and ½ inch, respectively, provided the foundations are designed in accordance with the recommendations of this report and proper engineering observation is conducted at the time of Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 14 construction. The differential settlement is anticipated to occur over a span of 40 feet. Due to granular nature of the site soil, a majority of the settlement is anticipated to occur during construction. The recommended bearing pressures are for dead and sustained live loads and may be increased by one-third to support short-term loading such as wind and seismic loads. Soil resistance available to withstand lateral loads on a shallow foundation is a function of the frictional resistance along the base of the footing and the passive resistance that may develop as the face of the structure tends to move into the soil. The frictional resistance between the base of the foundation and the subgrade soil may be computed using an allowable coefficient of friction of 0.25. The passive resistance may be computed using an allowable (factor of safety of 1.5 applied) equivalent fluid pressure of 250 pounds per cubic foot (pcf), assuming there is constant contact between the footing and undisturbed soil or engineered fill The maximum pressure should not exceed 5,000 psf. This allowable passive pressure is applicable for level (ground slope equal to or flatter than 5:1, horizontal:vertical) conditions only. No reduction is required when combining friction and passive pressure. Mat Foundation For preliminary design, an allowable bearing pressure of 3,000 psf may be used to design a square rigid mat foundation established on 2 feet of engineered fill and embedded at a depth of 5 feet below lowest adjacent grade. If the mat is embedded at a depth of 10 feet below lowest adjacent grade established on 2 feet of engineered fill, the allowable bearing pressure may be increased to 3,500 psf. The settlement of the rigid mat is estimated to be less than 2 inches when designed using the recommended bearing pressure. For a flexible mat foundation with the same embedment depth, the modulus of subgrade reaction k1 for designing the foundation is 138 pounds per cubic inch (pci) and 190 pci, respectively. These values should be adjusted for dimensions of the foundation having a length, L and width, W using the following formulas: k (L x B) = k1 [ (𝐵+ 1)/2𝐵 ]2 x Rf where Rf = (1 + 0.5 𝐵/𝐿)⁄1.5 Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 15 The modulus of subgrade reaction is a function of foundation dimension and soil properties. An interactive process between the geotechnical and structural engineers is expected to develop a compatible soil-structure interaction model as the foundation plan becomes available. The lateral load resistance recommended used for the shallow foundation system may also be used for the mat foundation. Drilled Caissons The recommended downward axial capacity versus pile length for a single 16- inch and 24-inch diameter cast-in-place concrete drilled caisson is presented on Figure 6. The structural engineer should apply an appropriate safety factor when calculating the allowable capacity. No reduction in axial capacity if the caisson is spaced at a distance of 3 times its diameter or larger. The settlement of the drilled caisson is anticipated to be less than one-half inch. For calculating lateral load resistance, an allowable passive pressure of 600 psf per foot of depth may be used. The maximum passive pressure should be limited to 6,000 psf. The lateral capacity should be reduced by 25 percent if the caisson is spaced less than 5 times its diameter. It is assumed that the top of the caisson is allowed to move ½ inch laterally under transient loading condition without adversely affecting the structure it is supporting. Soil-structural interaction response analysis for the caissons can be provided if requested. 6.4 Slab-on-Grade Concrete slabs-on-grade (at-grade slab) should be designed by the structural engineer in accordance with 2013 CBC requirements for very low expansive soil. A conventionally reinforced concrete slab-on-grade should be at least 4 inches thick and reinforced with a minimum of No. 3 rebar placed at 18-inches on- center, each direction (perpendicularly), mid-depth in the slab. More stringent requirements may be required by the structural engineer and/or architect. A vapor retarder consisting of a 10-mil visqueen should be used for indoor slab or area with moisture sensitive flooring or equipment will be placed. The vapor retarder should be overlapped with a minimum of 4 inches and underlain by 2 inches of sand. To protect the moisture retarder from damage due to construction activities, an additional 2 inches of sand should be placed atop the moisture retarder. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 16 Minor cracking of concrete after curing due to expansion, drying and shrinkage is normal and should be expected. However, cracking is often aggravated by a high water-to-cement ratio, high concrete temperature at the time of placement, small nominal aggregate size, and rapid moisture loss due to hot, dry, and/or windy weather conditions during placement and curing. Cracking due to temperature and moisture fluctuations can also be expected. The use of low- slump concrete or low water/cement ratios can reduce the potential for shrinkage cracking. Concrete placement during hot weather should be minimized due to the potential for slab curling. To reduce the potential for excessive cracking, concrete slabs-on-grade should be provided with construction or weakened plane joints at frequent intervals. 6.5 Concrete Flatwork The exposed subgrade for concrete flatwork should be scarified to a depth of at least 4 inches, moisture-conditioned to approximately two to three percent above optimum moisture content and compacted to 90 percent of the ASTM Test Method D1557 laboratory maximum density prior to concrete placement. As stated earlier, cracking of concrete is normal as it cures due to drying and shrinkage, and should be expected. However, cracking is often aggravated by a high water/cement ratio, high concrete temperature at the time of placement, small nominal aggregate size, and rapid moisture loss due to hot, dry, and/or windy weather conditions during placement and curing. Cracking due to temperature and moisture fluctuations can also be expected. The use of low slump concrete can reduce the potential for shrinkage cracking. 6.6 Temporary Excavations All temporary excavations without shoring support, should be performed in accordance with project plans, specifications and all Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) requirements, see: http://www.dir.ca.gov/title8/sb4a6.html Excavations 5 feet or deeper should be laid back or shored in accordance with OSHA requirements before personnel are allowed to enter. No surcharge loads should be permitted within a horizontal distance equal to the height of cut or 5 Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 17 feet, whichever is greater from the top of the cut, unless the cut is shored appropriately. During construction, the soil conditions should be regularly evaluated to verify that conditions are as anticipated. The contractor shall be responsible for providing the “competent person” required by OSHA standards to evaluate soil conditions. Soil types will vary, but Type C soils is expected at the site in most area. Close coordination between the competent person and the geotechnical engineer should be maintained to facilitate construction while providing safe excavations. 6.7 Temporary Shoring Should adequate space onsite not be obtainable to layback excavations for any subterranean construction at inclinations no steeper than 2:1, then the excavation should be retained by a temporary shoring system. Vertical cuts are not recommended at the site. Support of all adjacent existing structures without distress is the contractor’s responsibility. These shoring systems, should they be required, adjacent to existing structures should be designed by a California licensed civil or structural engineer. The contractor should forward their plans for the support system to Leighton for pre-construction review. In addition, it should be the contractor’s responsibility to undertake a pre-construction survey with benchmarks and photographs of the adjacent improvements should shoring be required. Type of shoring used to support temporary excavation should be left to the contractor’s judgment based on specific site conditions and construction safety. The following are recommendations for designing a cantilever or raker-braced shoring system: Shoring Type Lateral Earth Pressure (Level Backfill) Cantilever 32 psf/ft Raker-braced 30H The recommended lateral earth pressure for a raker-braced shoring system should consist of a trapezoidal distribution with zero pressure at the top and Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 18 bottom of the shoring and 30H (in psf) between 0.25H and 0.75H, where H is the height of the shoring in feet. NO safety factor has been applied to the recommendations below unless noted otherwise. The shoring engineer should incorporate an adequate safety factor in designing the shoring system. In addition to the recommended earth pressure, the walls should be designed to resist any applicable surcharge loads behind the shoring. The solider beams should be spaced at least 2.5 times the drilled hole on-center with a maximum spacing of 8 feet. The portion of a soldier beam that extends below the excavation may be used to provide passive resistance for the shoring system. A passive pressure of 600 psf per foot of depth may be used for a soldier pile embedded in competent native soils below the excavation. The maximum passive pressure should be limited to 6,000 psf. To develop the full lateral value, provisions should be taken to assure firm contact between the solider beams and the undisturbed soils. The shoring engineer should not consider any passive resistance to a depth equal to one drilled hole diameter of the soldier beam below the excavation line. A friction coefficient of 0.5 may be used between the soldier beam and the retained soil. When using the frictional resistance between the soldier pile and the soil, it is assumed that the drilled hole of the soldier pile will be backfilled with lean-mix concrete, and there is full contact between the lean-mix concrete and the retained soil. As mentioned earlier, the drilling contractor should be prepared to use special techniques and measures, if necessary, to permit the proper installation of the soldier beams in case of caving and raveling of isolated loose soil layers or local groundwater seepage that may exist. Lagging should be provided between the soldier beams to control sloughing. Lagging should be placed in such a manner to maintain a tight soil to lagging contact. All voids behind the lagging should be filled with compacted materials or slurry. Lagging may be installed with a maximum spacing of 1½ inches to allow drainage from behind the wall. The soldier piles should be designed for the full anticipated lateral pressure. However, the pressure on the lagging will be less due to arching in the soils. For clear spans of up to 8 feet, we recommend that the lagging be designed for a semi-circular distribution of earth pressure where Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 19 the maximum pressure is 300 psf at the mid-line between soldier piles, and 0 psf at the soldier piles. The rakers may be supported on inclined footings established in competent native soils at the bottom of the excavation. The raker foundation should be embedded at least two feet below ground surface. The allowable bearing capacity for a two-foot wide raker foundation is as follows: Raker Foundation Design Parameters Inclination from Horizontal 45˚ 55˚ Allowable Bearing Pressure 2,500 2,250 The performance of the shoring system should be monitored on a regular basis during and after installation. The monitoring should consist of surveying of the lateral and vertical locations of the tops of all the soldier piles. The survey data should be submitted to the shoring engineer and geotechnical consultant for review. It is recommended that the maximum deflection behind the shoring be limited to between one-half inch to one inch. Although groundwater was not encountered within the anticipated depth of excavation during our exploration, it is prudent to include provisions for nuisance water removal in case groundwater seepage is encountered during excavation. We recommend that the adjacent existing structures and streets be surveyed for horizontal and vertical locations. Also, a survey of existing cracks and offsets in the streets should be performed and recorded along with photographic records. 6.8 Earth Retaining Structures The following parameters may be used for the design of retaining structures backfilled with non-expansive soil: Condition Equivalent Fluid Unit Weight for Granular Backfill) Active 32 psf/ft (Level Backfill) At-Rest 50 psf/ft (Level Backfill) Seismic 20 psf/ft *Inverted Triangular Distribution and only required where retaining wall is taller than 12 feet Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 20 Unrestrained walls that are free to rotate or deflect may be designed using the active earth pressure. For restrained walls that are fixed against rotation (basement walls), the at-rest condition should be used. The lateral passive resistance should be taken into account only if it is ensured that the soil providing passive resistance, embedded against the foundation elements, will remain intact with time. We also recommend using the at-rest pressure for design of walls supporting settlement-sensitive structures, such as adjacent buildings and improvements, if any. The above-recommended lateral pressures are based on a granular soil with total unit weight of 120 pcf. NO safety factor has been applied to the recommendations. The structural engineer should incorporate an adequate safety factor in designing the retaining wall system. Backfill for the retaining structures should be granular, relatively non-expansive (Expansion Index less than 20) soil and be constructed with a backdrain system. The backdrain should be sloped at a minimum of one percent toward an approved non-erosive outlet. The non-expansive on-site soil free of debris or other deleterious materials is suitable to be used as backfill behind retaining structure. Backfill for retaining walls should be compacted to a minimum of 90 percent relative compaction based on ASTM Test Method D1557. Relatively light construction equipment should be used to backfill the retaining walls. The walls should also be waterproofed or at least damp-proofed, depending upon the degree of moisture protection desired. Surface drainage should be designed to direct water away from foundations and toward approved drainage devices. Irrigation of landscaping should be controlled to maintain, as much as possible, consistent moisture content sufficient to provide healthy plant growth without overwatering. Lateral pressures from other surcharge and superimposed loads (for example, from vehicle traffic and adjacent structures) should be added to the above recommended lateral earth pressures if the loads fall within a projected area of an imaginary line extended at an angle of 45 degrees from the wall foundation. Thirty percent of the surcharge load may be used for unrestrained walls and fifty percent of the surcharge may be used for restrained walls. The foundations for retaining walls may be designed for a maximum net allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,600 psf supported by at least two feet of compacted fill. The bottom of the footing is recommended to be embedded at Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 21 least 18 inches below the lowest adjacent exterior grade. The post-construction settlement of retaining wall foundations designed in accordance with the recommendations of this report is estimated to be less than one inch. 6.9 Drilled Caissons Construction Bottoms of drilled caissons (cast-in-place piles) excavations should be reasonably free of loose soil before reinforcing steel is installed and concrete is placed. We recommend that Leighton & Associates, Inc. observe pile drilling to establish that the caissons are founded in suitable undisturbed native materials and constructed in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. Cast-in-place piles should be constructed in accordance with Section 205- 3.3.2 of the 2012 Standard Specifications for Public Works Construction (Green Book). Casing of each shaft may be necessary if excessive caving of the drilled hole is encountered. If water cannot be removed from excavations prior to concrete placement, then concrete will need to be placed by tremie pipe or concrete pump hose. The concrete should be tremied or pumped to the bottom of the hole keeping the tremie or pipe below the surface of the concrete to avoid entrapment of water in placed concrete. As concrete is poured, water is displaced out of the hole. Some difficult drilling through the fill soils may be experienced due to rubble in the fill. The drilling contractor should be equipped to penetrate through this rubble, if encountered. We understand that closely spaced piles may be required for this site. Care should be taken to avoid “blow-outs” into open drilled shafts when placing fresh concrete in adjacent closely spaced drilled shafts. Fluid pressure of uncured concrete under on-the-order-of (≈) 40-feet of head can deform or displace soils into an adjacent closely spaced shaft. For new piles placed closer-than (<) 2½ diameters on center, construction sequencing should require curing concrete in one shaft before drilling the adjacent closely spaced shaft. Or, multiple (two or more) temporary steel casings can be used to stabilize multiple (two or more) adjacent closely-spaced shafts simultaneously. Other options can be considered as the means-and-methods of the foundation contractor. 6.10 Corrosion Protection Measures Based on results of our laboratory testing, concrete structures in contact with the onsite soil will likely have “negligible” exposure to water-soluble sulfates in the Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 22 soil. Therefore, common Type II Portland cement may be used for concrete construction in contact with site soils. Subgrade soil should be tested for water- soluble sulfate content prior to final design of the concrete structures. Import fill soil should be tested for corrosivity and sulfate attack before import to the site. Further testing of the subgrade soils near finish grade should be performed to verify the results. Based on corrosivity test results, the onsite soil is considered corrosive to ferrous metals. Therefore, based on these results, ferrous pipe buried in moist to wet site earth materials should be avoided by using high-density polyethylene (HDPE), polyvinyl chloride (PVC) and/or other non-ferrous pipe when possible. Ferrous pipe can also be protected by polyethylene bags, tap or coatings, di- electric fittings or other means to separate the pipe from on-site soils. A qualified corrosion engineer should be consulted for necessary mitigations for corrosive soil. 6.11 Surface Drainage Surface drainage should be designed to direct water away from foundations and toward approved drainage devices. Irrigation of landscaping should be controlled to maintain, as much as possible, consistent moisture content sufficient to provide healthy plant growth without over watering. 6.12 Geotechnical Services During Construction Our geotechnical recommendations are contingent upon Leighton providing geotechnical observation and testing services during earthwork and foundation construction. There is a potential for encountering deeper undocumented fill or otherwise unacceptable existing soil between or beyond our boring locations. We are unaware of any existing fill placement documentation for these building sites. Therefore, inconsistent existing fill materials and consistencies may be encountered during construction, possibly requiring revised geotechnical recommendations. Our geotechnical recommendations provided in this report are based on information available at the time the report was prepared and may change as plans are developed. Additional geotechnical exploration, testing and/or analysis may be required based on final plans. Leighton should review site grading, foundation and shoring (if any) plans when available, to comment further on Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 23 geotechnical aspects of this project and check to see general conformance of final project plans to recommendations presented in this report. Leighton should be retained to provide geotechnical observation and testing during excavation and all phases of earthwork. Our conclusions and recommendations should be reviewed and verified by us during construction and revised accordingly if geotechnical conditions encountered vary from our findings and interpretations. Geotechnical observation and testing should be provided:  During all excavation,  During compaction of all fill materials,  After excavation of all footings and prior to placement of concrete,  During pile and shoring installation,  During utility trench backfilling and compaction,  During pavement subgrade and base preparation, and/or  If and when any unusual geotechnical conditions are encountered. 7.0 LIMITATIONS Leighton’s work was performed using the degree of care and skill ordinarily exercised, under similar circumstances, by reputable geotechnical consultants practicing in this or similar localities. No other warranty, express or implied, is made as to the conclusions and professional opinions included in this report. As in many projects, conditions revealed in excavations may be at variance with preliminary findings. If this occurs, the changed conditions must be evaluated by the geotechnical consultant and additional recommendations be obtained, as warranted. The identification and testing of hazardous, toxic or contaminated materials were outside the scope of Leighton’s work. Should such materials be encountered at any time, or their existence is suspected, all measures stipulated in local, county, state and federal regulations, as applicable, should be implemented. This report is issued with the understanding that it is the responsibility of the owner or a duly authorized agent acting on behalf of the owner to ensure that the information and recommendations contained herein are brought to the attention of the necessary design consultants for the project and incorporated into the plans; and that the necessary steps are taken to see that the contracts carry out such recommendations in the field. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 24 The findings of this report are considered valid as of the present date; however, changes in the condition of a property can occur with the passage of time, whether due to natural processes or the work of man on the subject or adjacent properties. In addition, changes in standards of practice may occur from legislation or the broadening of knowledge. Accordingly, the findings of this report may at some future time be invalidated wholly or partially by changes outside Leighton’s control. The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based in part upon data that were obtained from a necessarily limited number of observations, site visits, excavations, samples and testes. Such information can be obtained only with respect to the specific locations explored, and therefore may not completely define all subsurface conditions throughout the site. The nature of many sites is that differing geotechnical and/or geological conditions can occur within small distances and under varying climatic conditions. Furthermore, changes in subsurface conditions can and do occur over time. Therefore, the findings, conclusions, and recommendations presented in this report should be considered preliminary if unanticipated conditions are encountered and additional explorations, testing and analyses may be necessary to develop alternative recommendations. This report has been prepared for the express use of JPI Real Estate Acquisition. and its design consultants, and only as related expressly to the assessment of the geotechnical constraints of developing the subject site and for construction purposes. This report may not be used by others or for other projects without the express written consent of JPI Real Estate Acquisition and our firm. If parties other than Leighton are engaged to provide construction geotechnical services, they must be notified that they will be required to assume complete responsibility for the geotechnical phase of the project by concurring with the findings and recommendations in this report or by providing alternative recommendations. Any persons using this report for bidding or construction purposes should perform such independent investigations as they deem necessary to satisfy themselves as to the surface and/or subsurface conditions to be encountered and the procedures to be used in the performance of work on the subject site. Geotechnical-Engineering Report Geotechnical Services Are Performed for Specific Purposes, Persons, and ProjectsGeotechnical engineers structure their services to meet the specific needs of their clients. A geotechnical-engineering study conducted for a civil engineer may not fulfill the needs of a constructor — a construction contractor — or even another civil engineer. Because each geotechnical- engineering study is unique, each geotechnical-engineering report is unique, prepared solely for the client. No one except you should rely on this geotechnical-engineering report without first conferring with the geotechnical engineer who prepared it. And no one — not even you — should apply this report for any purpose or project except the one originally contemplated. Read the Full ReportSerious problems have occurred because those relying on a geotechnical-engineering report did not read it all. Do not rely on an executive summary. Do not read selected elements only. Geotechnical Engineers Base Each Report on a Unique Set of Project-Specific FactorsGeotechnical engineers consider many unique, project-specific factors when establishing the scope of a study. Typical factors include: the client’s goals, objectives, and risk-management preferences; the general nature of the structure involved, its size, and configuration; the location of the structure on the site; and other planned or existing site improvements, such as access roads, parking lots, and underground utilities. Unless the geotechnical engineer who conducted the study specifically indicates otherwise, do not rely on a geotechnical-engineering report that was:• not prepared for you;• not prepared for your project;• not prepared for the specific site explored; or• completed before important project changes were made. Typical changes that can erode the reliability of an existing geotechnical-engineering report include those that affect: • the function of the proposed structure, as when it’s changed from a parking garage to an office building, or from a light-industrial plant to a refrigerated warehouse;• the elevation, configuration, location, orientation, or weight of the proposed structure;• the composition of the design team; or• project ownership. As a general rule, always inform your geotechnical engineer of project changes—even minor ones—and request an assessment of their impact. Geotechnical engineers cannot accept responsibility or liability for problems that occur because their reports do not consider developments of which they were not informed. Subsurface Conditions Can ChangeA geotechnical-engineering report is based on conditions that existed at the time the geotechnical engineer performed the study. Do not rely on a geotechnical-engineering report whose adequacy may have been affected by: the passage of time; man-made events, such as construction on or adjacent to the site; or natural events, such as floods, droughts, earthquakes, or groundwater fluctuations. Contact the geotechnical engineer before applying this report to determine if it is still reliable. A minor amount of additional testing or analysis could prevent major problems. Most Geotechnical Findings Are Professional OpinionsSite exploration identifies subsurface conditions only at those points where subsurface tests are conducted or samples are taken. Geotechnical engineers review field and laboratory data and then apply their professional judgment to render an opinion about subsurface conditions throughout the site. Actual subsurface conditions may differ — sometimes significantly — from those indicated in your report. Retaining the geotechnical engineer who developed your report to provide geotechnical-construction observation is the most effective method of managing the risks associated with unanticipated conditions. A Report’s Recommendations Are Not FinalDo not overrely on the confirmation-dependent recommendations included in your report. Confirmation-dependent recommendations are not final, because geotechnical engineers develop them principally from judgment and opinion. Geotechnical engineers can finalize their recommendations only by observing actual subsurface conditions revealed during construction. The geotechnical engineer who developed your report cannot assume responsibility or liability for the report’s confirmation-dependent recommendations if that engineer does not perform the geotechnical-construction observation required to confirm the recommendations’ applicability. A Geotechnical-Engineering Report Is Subject to MisinterpretationOther design-team members’ misinterpretation of geotechnical-engineering reports has resulted in costly Important Information about This Subsurface problems are a principal cause of construction delays, cost overruns, claims, and disputes. While you cannot eliminate all such risks, you can manage them. The following information is provided to help. problems. Confront that risk by having your geo technical engineer confer with appropriate members of the design team after submitting the report. Also retain your geotechnical engineer to review pertinent elements of the design team’s plans and specifications. Constructors can also misinterpret a geotechnical-engineering report. Confront that risk by having your geotechnical engineer participate in prebid and preconstruction conferences, and by providing geotechnical construction observation. Do Not Redraw the Engineer’s LogsGeotechnical engineers prepare final boring and testing logs based upon their interpretation of field logs and laboratory data. To prevent errors or omissions, the logs included in a geotechnical-engineering report should never be redrawn for inclusion in architectural or other design drawings. Only photographic or electronic reproduction is acceptable, but recognize that separating logs from the report can elevate risk. Give Constructors a Complete Report and GuidanceSome owners and design professionals mistakenly believe they can make constructors liable for unanticipated subsurface conditions by limiting what they provide for bid preparation. To help prevent costly problems, give constructors the complete geotechnical-engineering report, but preface it with a clearly written letter of transmittal. In that letter, advise constructors that the report was not prepared for purposes of bid development and that the report’s accuracy is limited; encourage them to confer with the geotechnical engineer who prepared the report (a modest fee may be required) and/or to conduct additional study to obtain the specific types of information they need or prefer. A prebid conference can also be valuable. Be sure constructors have sufficient time to perform additional study. Only then might you be in a position to give constructors the best information available to you, while requiring them to at least share some of the financial responsibilities stemming from unanticipated conditions. Read Responsibility Provisions CloselySome clients, design professionals, and constructors fail to recognize that geotechnical engineering is far less exact than other engineering disciplines. This lack of understanding has created unrealistic expectations that have led to disappointments, claims, and disputes. To help reduce the risk of such outcomes, geotechnical engineers commonly include a variety of explanatory provisions in their reports. Sometimes labeled “limitations,” many of these provisions indicate where geotechnical engineers’ responsibilities begin and end, to help others recognize their own responsibilities and risks. Read these provisions closely. Ask questions. Your geotechnical engineer should respond fully and frankly. Environmental Concerns Are Not Covered The equipment, techniques, and personnel used to perform an environmental study differ significantly from those used to perform a geotechnical study. For that reason, a geotechnical-engineering report does not usually relate any environmental findings, conclusions, or recommendations; e.g., about the likelihood of encountering underground storage tanks or regulated contaminants. Unanticipated environmental problems have led to numerous project failures. If you have not yet obtained your own environmental information, ask your geotechnical consultant for risk-management guidance. Do not rely on an environmental report prepared for someone else. Obtain Professional Assistance To Deal with MoldDiverse strategies can be applied during building design, construction, operation, and maintenance to prevent significant amounts of mold from growing on indoor surfaces. To be effective, all such strategies should be devised for the express purpose of mold prevention, integrated into a comprehensive plan, and executed with diligent oversight by a professional mold-prevention consultant. Because just a small amount of water or moisture can lead to the development of severe mold infestations, many mold- prevention strategies focus on keeping building surfaces dry. While groundwater, water infiltration, and similar issues may have been addressed as part of the geotechnical- engineering study whose findings are conveyed in this report, the geotechnical engineer in charge of this project is not a mold prevention consultant; none of the services performed in connection with the geotechnical engineer’s study were designed or conducted for the purpose of mold prevention. Proper implementation of the recommendations conveyed in this report will not of itself be sufficient to prevent mold from growing in or on the structure involved. Rely, on Your GBC-Member Geotechnical Engineer for Additional AssistanceMembership in the Geotechnical Business Council of the Geoprofessional Business Association exposes geotechnical engineers to a wide array of risk-confrontation techniques that can be of genuine benefit for everyone involved with a construction project. Confer with you GBC-Member geotechnical engineer for more information. 8811 Colesville Road/Suite G106, Silver Spring, MD 20910 Telephone: 301/565-2733 Facsimile: 301/589-2017 e-mail: info@geoprofessional.org www.geoprofessional.org Copyright 2015 by Geoprofessional Business Association (GBA). Duplication, reproduction, or copying of this document, or its contents, in whole or in part, by any means whatsoever, is strictly prohibited, except with GBA’s specific written permission. Excerpting, quoting, or otherwise extracting wording from this document is permitted only with the express written permission of GBA, and only for purposes of scholarly research or book review. Only members of GBA may use this document as a complement to or as an element of a geotechnical-engineering report. Any other firm, individual, or other entity that so uses this document without being a GBA member could be commiting negligent or intentional (fraudulent) misrepresentation. Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 0 2,000 4,000 Feet Figure 1 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton 1 " = 2,000 ' Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F01_SLM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/6/2015 5:12:07 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 SITE LOCATION MAP Proposed Residential DevelopmentVacant Property on the SW Corner of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California Approximate Site Location &? &? &< &? &< &< &? &< &? &?&<&? &? &< T. D . 7 1 . 5 ' T. D . 1 1 . 5 ' T. D . 1 6 . 5 ' T. D . 7 1 . 5 ' T.D.76.5' T.D . 2 6 . 5 ' B- 8 B- 6 LB - 1 B- 7 LP - 1 LP - 3 B- 4 LB - 2 B- 3 B-2 LB-3 B-1 B- 5 LP - 2 Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors Ma p S a v e d a s V : \ D r a f t i n g \ 1 1 0 9 1 \ 0 0 1 \ m a p s \ 1 1 0 9 1 _ F 0 2 _ B L M _ 2 0 1 5 _ 9 _ 1 5 . m x d o n 9 / 1 5 / 2 0 1 5 1 2 : 5 9 : 3 1 P M BO R I N G L O C A T I O N M A P Pr o p o s e d J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Va c a n t P r o p e r t y o n t h e S W C o r n e r o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d a n d G e n e A u t r y W a y An a h e i m , O r a n g e C o u n t y , C a l i f o r n i a Figure 2 Leighton ³01 0 02 0 0 Fe e t Sc a l e : Ba s e M a p : E S R I A r c G I S O n l i n e 2 0 1 5 Th e m a t i c I n f o r m a t i o n : L e i g h t o n Ba s e : A r c h i t e c s O r a n g e 1 " = 1 0 0 ' Pr o j e c t : 1 1 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 En g / G e o l : V P I / J M P Au t h o r : L e i g h t o n G e o m a t i c s ( a s a k o w i c z ) Da t e : S e p t e m b e r 2 0 1 5 Le g e n d &< Ap p r o x i m a t e L o c a t i o n o f E x p l o r a t o r y S o i l B o r i n g W i t h T o t a l D e p t h ( T . D . ) . Gr o u n d w a t e r N o t E n c o u n t e r e d D u r i n g D r i l l i n g ( L + A , 2 0 1 5 ) Ap p r o x i m a t e L o c a t i o n o f E x p l o r a t o r y S o i l B o r i n g a n d T e m p . P e r c W e l l Wi t h T o t a l D e p t h ( T . D . ) . G r o u n d w a t e r N o t E n c o u n t e r e d D u r i n g D r i l l i n g ( L + A , 2 0 1 5 ) &? Ap p r o x i m a t e L o c a t i o n o f E x p l o r a t o r y S o i l B o r i n g (S o u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a G e o t e c h n i c a l , 2 0 0 5 ) &<LB - 1 T.D . 7 1 . 5 ' LB - 1 B- 1 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 0 4,000 8,000 Feet Figure 3 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton, USGS 1 " = 4,000 ' Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F03_RGM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/6/2015 5:24:07 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 REGIONAL GEOLOGY MAPProposed Residential DevelopmentVacant Property on the SW Corner of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California ApproximateSite Location Legend !!!!!!! !! !! !!!!!!Qya - Young Alluvial ValleyDeposits Qyf - Young Alluvial FanDeposits Qof - Old Alluvial FanDeposits Qw - Alluvial WashDeposits Qya Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qyf Qw Qw Qof Qof Qof Qof Qyf ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !! ! ! !!!! ! !! ! !!!!!!!!! ! !!!! ! ! ! ! ! !!!!! ! !!! !!!!!!! ! ! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! ! ! ! ! P e lic a n Hill fa ult Peralt aHillsfa u l t W a l n u t C r e e k f a u l t ElModenofault THU MS-HuntingtonBeach Los Al a m ito sfault Central Avenuef a ult Source: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, Earthstar Geographics, CNES/AirbusDS, USDA, USGS, AEX, Getmapping, Aerogrid, IGN, IGP, swisstopo, andthe GIS User Community, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 048 Miles Figure 4 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton, CGS, Bryant 2010 1 " = 4 miles Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F03_RFM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/5/2015 5:26:26 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 HISTORIC SEISMICITY AND REGINAL FAULT MAP Proposed Residential DevelopmentVacant Property on the SW Corner of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California ApproximateSite Location Legend Historic (<200 years) Holocene (<10K years) Quaternary (<1,6M years) Pre-Quaternary (>1,6M years) Earthquakes 1769-2014 Moment Magnitude Range !4 - 5 !5 - 6 !6 - 7 Copyright:© 2013 National Geographic Society, i-cubed, Esri, HERE, DeLorme, MapmyIndia, © OpenStreetMap contributors ³ 0 4,000 8,000 Feet Figure 5 Scale: Leighton Base Map: ESRI ArcGIS Online 2015 Thematic Information: Leighton, CGS 1 " = 4,000 ' Project: 11091.001 Eng/Geol: VPI/JMP Map Saved as V:\Drafting\11091\001\maps\11091_F06_SHM_2015_8_5.mxd on 8/6/2015 5:26:24 PM Author: Leighton Geomatics (asakowicz) Date: August 2015 SEISMIC HAZARD MAP Proposed Residential Development16 Acre Site NE & SW of State College Blvd and Gene Autry WayAnaheim, Orange County, California ApproximateSite Location Legend Liquefaction Susceptibility Zone Uplift Capacity can be taken as 40% of downward capacity.Figure 6 JPI Stadium Park Anaheim, California Drilled Caisson Capacity Curve Project No. 10274.010 Date 8-11-15 0.0 10.0 20.0 30.0 40.0 50.0 60.0 0 50 100 150 200 250 Em b e d m e n t b e l o w P i l e C a p ( f t ) Ultimate Downward Axial Capacity (kips) 16" Diameter 24" Diameter APPENDIX A REFERENCES Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 10274.010 A-1 APPENDIX A References American Concrete Institute (ACI), 2008, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318-08) and Commentary, an ACI Standard, reported by ACI Committee 318, January 2008. American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), 2013, “Minimum Design Loads for Buildings and Other Structures,” ASCE/SEI 7-10, Third Printing, Errata Incorporated through March 15, 2013. Boore, D. M. and Atkinson, G. M., 2008, Ground-Motion Prediction Equations for the Average Horizontal Component of PGA, PGV, and 5%-Damped PSA at Spectral Periods between 0.01 s and 10.0 s, Earthquake Spectra, Vol. 24, No. 1, February 2008. Bryant, W.A. and Hart, E.W., Interim Revision 2007, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act with Index to Earthquake Fault Zones Maps, California Geological Survey Special Publication 42. Butlers, J., 1997, Analysis of Energy Measurement Methods of Standard Penetration Test Driving Systems, Master Thesis Submitted at Utah State University in Logan. California Building Standards Commission, 2013, 2013 California Building Code, California Code of Regulations, Title 24, Part 2, Volume 2 of 2, Based on 2012 International Building Code, Effective January 1, 2014. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), 2007, Caltrans Storm Water Quality Handbooks, Project Planning and Design Guide, May 2007. California Department of Water Resources, 1957, The California Water Plan: Bulletin 3, 246 p. California Geological Survey (CGS; formerly California Division of Mines and Geology, CDMG), 1997, Seismic Hazard Zone Report for the Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5 Minute Quadrangles, Orange County, California, Seismic Hazard Zone Report 03. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 Appendix A. References (cont’d) A-2 , 1998, State of California Seismic Hazard Zones, Anaheim Quadrangle, Revised Official Map, released April 15, 1998, map scale 1:24,000. , 2000, CD-ROM containing digital images of Official Maps of Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones that affect the Southern Region, DMG CD 2000-003 2000. Eckmanm E.C., Strahorn, A.T., Holmes, L.C., and Guersney, J.E., 1919, Soils Map of the Anaheim Area, California: United States Department of Agriculture, Bureau of Soils, in cooperation with the University of California, Agricultural Experiment Station, scale 1:62,000 Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2003, Flood Hazard Map Image, ESRI/FEMA Hazard Awareness. https://msc.fema.gov/portal Morton D.M., and Miller, F.K., 2006, Geologic Map of the San Bernardino and Santa Ana, 30’ x 60’ Quadrangles, California, USGS Open File Report 2006-1217, map scale 1:100,000. NETR, Historical Aerials and Topographic Maps of the Site, copyright 2011, http://www.historicaerials.com/ Petersen, M. D., Bryan, W. A., Cramer, C. H., Cao, Tianquing, Reichle, M. S., Frankel, A. D., Lienkaemper, J. J., McCrory, P. A., and Schwartz, D. P., 1996, Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Assessment for the State of California: California Division of Mines and Geology Open-File Report 96-08, 33 p. Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board, Technical Guidance Document for the Preparation of Conceptual/Preliminary and/or Project Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs), dated December 20, 2013. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), 1999, Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117 Guidelines for Analyzing and Mitigating Liquefaction Hazards in California, dated March 1999. Terzaghi, K., Peck, R., and Mesri, G., 1996, Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Third Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., Publishers, New York, Chichester, Brisbane, Toronto, Singapore. Geotechnical Exploration Report Project No. 11091.001 Appendix A. References (cont’d) A-3 Troxell, H.C., 1942, Floods of March 1938 in Southern California, Federal Emergency Administration of Public Works and Works Progress Administration, United States Department of the Interior. United States Geological Survey (USGS), 2008a, Interactive Deaggregations, Based on the 2008 update source and attenuation models of the NSHMP (Peterson and others, 2008), USGS website, <https://geohazards.usgs.gov/deaggint/2008/> ______, 2008b, National Seismic Hazard Maps – Fault Parameters, http://geohazards.usgs.gov/cfusion/hazfaults_search/hf_search_main.cfm ______, 2012, Map Locator & Downloader, http://store.usgs.gov/b2c_usgs/usgs/maplocator______, 2013, U.S. Seismic Design Maps, http://earthquake.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/application.php APPENDIX B BORING LOGS @Surface: 5 inches asphalt @0.4': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, loose, fine sand @5': Silty SAND to SAND, olive brown, moist, loose Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@6': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand, friable @10': fine to medium sand @12.5': fine to coarse sand, trace fine and coarse gravel @15': SILT, olive brown, very moist, soft @15.4': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine tomedium sand, trace coarse sand, fine gravel @17.5': fine sand, fine and coarse subangular gravel @20': fine to medium sand, no gravel @23.75': SILT, olive brown, moist, firm @25': SAND, light brown, moist, dense, fine to medium sand,few coarse sand, few fine and coarse gravel 2 4 2 3 SM SP/SM SP MLSP ML SP S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 22 3 2 3 3 345 4 4 6 4 3 4 576 7 6 7 5 8 10 653 710 14 8 9 14 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 So i l C l a s s . 7-22-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-1 Logged By Date Drilled 140 135 130 125 120 115 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @30': dense, fine to medium sand @32.5': medium dense, fine to coarse sand @35': fine sand, trace medium sand @37.5': SILT, olive brown, moist, stiff, very fine 2-inch layer ofvery fine sand @40': very stiff @42.5': SAND, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, veryfine sand @48.5': SILT, olive brown, moist, very stiff @53.75': SAND, light brown, slightly moist, dense, fine sand @57.5': trace coarse sand 3 3 15 11 ML SP ML SP S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 81516 1111 13 8 11 15 446 7 9 11 9 14 16 769 9 10 6 4 4 8 3412 1517 22 12 15 17 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 So i l C l a s s . 7-22-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-1 Logged By Date Drilled 110 105 100 95 90 85 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @60': SAND, light brown, moist, dense, fine to medium sand,few brown silt lenses @62.5': few coarse sand @65': slightly moist, fine to medium sand, few coarse sand, fewsilt lenses @67.5': SILT with Gravel, reddish brown, moist, very stiff, fineand coarse gravel @70.67': GRAVEL, dark brown to gray, slightly moist,mechanically broken and moderately to severely weathered,trace oxide stains Notes:Total Depth: 71.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingBoring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SP ML GP S-24 S-25 S-26 S-27 S-28 111930 1517 25 13 17 19 799 24 30 33 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 So i l C l a s s . 7-22-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 3 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-1 Logged By Date Drilled 80 75 70 65 60 55 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface 3.5 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumented (Afu)@0.4': SAND, light brown, moist, fine to medium sand, fewcoarse sand @2.5': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, loose Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@3.5': SAND, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand, loose @7.5': few medium sand @10': medium dense, fine sand @17.5': fine to medium sand @22.5': trace medium to coarse sand @28.5': 3-inch layer of silty sand, light brown, fine sand 3 4 SP SM SP S-1 S-2 S-3 S-4 S-5 S-6 S-7 S-8 S-9 S-10 S-11 34 6 3 4 4 346 5 6 6 5 6 9 556 4 7 9 5 6 10 577 34 8 5 9 14 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-2 Logged By Date Drilled 140 135 130 125 120 115 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @30': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand, tracesilt @35': fine to coarse sand, trace fine subangular gravel @37.5': fine sand, faintly laminated @40': SILT, light brown, moist, very stiff, trace fine sand @40.5': SAND, yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, finesand @42.5': fine sand grades to very fine sand with depth @43.75': SILT, olive brown, slightly moist, very stiff @45': very moist, stiff, trace very fine sand, few oxide stains @47.5': moist, few very fine sand @50': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand @52.5': SAND, light brown, moist, dense, fine sand, trace silt @57.5': fine to medium sand, trace gravel 3 12 SP ML SP ML SM SP S-12 S-13 S-14 S-15 S-16 S-17 S-18 S-19 S-20 S-21 S-22 S-23 71010 610 14 7 8 10 71210 7 9 12 9 8 8 345 4 4 8 6 8 10 111721 1218 18 12 18 24 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-2 Logged By Date Drilled 110 105 100 95 90 85 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @60': SAND, light brown, moist to very moist, dense, fine tomedium sand, trace fine rounded gravel @62.5': Sandy CLAY with Gravel, reddish brown, moist, verystiff, fine to medium sand, fine angular gravel @65': Clayey GRAVEL, grayish brown, moist, very dense,coarse mechanically broken gravel @67.5': Sandy Clayey GRAVEL, reddish brown, moist, verydense, mechanically broken angular gravel @70': Sandy GRAVEL with Clay, reddish brown, moist, verydense, fine to coarse sand, coarse mechanically brokengravel Notes:Total Depth: 71.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingBoring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SP CL GC GP/GC GP S-24 S-25 S-26 S-27 S-28 152120 76 11 26 33 25 234040 24 40 45 144' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 3 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-2 Logged By Date Drilled 80 75 70 65 60 55 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface: 4.5 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumentedSilty SAND to SAND, reddish brown, moist, fine to medium sand Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@5': SAND, yellowish brown, moist, medium dense, fine tomedium sand @10': light brown, fine sand, trace medium sand, friable @15': dense, trace fine gravel @20': brown, medium dense, fine sand @25': light brown, dense 2 3 SM SP BB-1 R-1 S-1 R-2 S-2 R-3 7 14 20 7 6 6 151826 7 8 11 1221 40 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 120 115 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @30': SAND, light brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand @35': brown, dense, fine to coarse sand @40': Silty SAND, olive brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand @40.5': SAND, light brown, slighly moist, medium dense, finesand @45': Silty SAND to Sandy SILT, olive brown, slightly moist,very stiff/medium dense, very fine sand, few oxide stains @50': Silty SAND, light brown, slightly moist, medium dense,very fine sand @55': SILT, light brown, slightly moist, hard, oxide stains @56.5': Gravelly CLAY, reddish brown, moist, fine and coarsegravel 4 9 SP SM SP SM/ML SM ML CL S-3 R-4 S-4 R-5 S-5 R-6 8911 13 19 25 7 10 16 131117 7 10 11 1525 27 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 30 35 40 45 50 55 60 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled 115 110 105 100 95 90 85 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @60': Gravelly SAND to Gravelly CLAY, reddish brown, moist,medium dense/stiff, fine to coarse sand, fine and coarsegravel @65': Sandy GRAVEL to Gravelly SAND, reddish brown, verymoist, very dense, fine to coarse sand, fine and coarsegravel, trace clay @70': Sandy GRAVEL, reddish brown, moist, very dense, fine tocoarse sand, fine and coarse gravel Notes:Total Depth: 71.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingBoring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/21/15 SP/CL SP/GP GP S-6 R-7 S-7 16910 30 50/5" 21 37 45 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 3 of 3 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LB-3 Logged By Date Drilled 85 80 75 70 65 60 55 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface: 3.5 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumented (Afu)@0.3': Clayey SAND, yellowish brown, moist, fine sand, tracefine gravel @2.5': becomes reddish brown Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@4': SAND, brown, moist, fine to medium sand @5': light brown, slightly moist, medium dense, very fine sand @10': No recovery @11.5': dry, loose, fine to medium sand, trace angular gravel Notes:Total Depth: 13 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingTemporary percolation well installed 7/21/15Well screen: 5-10 feet bgsWell annulus: 3/4 inch gravel 5-13 feet bgsPercolation well removed 7/22/15Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SC SP BB-1 R-1 R-2 S-1 7 10 13 5 9 11 435 147' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 1 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-1 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @Surface: 4 inches asphalt Artificial Fill, undocumented@0.4': SAND, light brown, slightly moist to moist, fine sand,trace fine gravel @4.5': Quaternary Alluvium (Qal) @5': SAND, brown, moist, medium dense, fine sand, tracemedium sand, trace silt @10': light brown, fine to medium sand, friable @15': fine to medium sand, becomes finer with depth @20': dense, fine to medium sand, few gravel with depth SP SP BB-1 R-1 R-2 R-3 R-4 3 5 10 7 8 16 11 14 20 1728 31 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 2 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-2 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 120 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH @4.5': Quaternary Alluvium (Qal)@25': fine sand, few medium sand Notes:Total Depth: 26.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingTemporary percolation well installed 7/21/15Well screen: 20-25 feet bgsWell annulus: 3/4 inch gravel 20-26.5 feet bgsPercolation well removed 7/22/15Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 R-5 121821 145' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 25 30 35 40 45 50 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 2 of 2 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-2 Logged By Date Drilled 120 115 110 105 100 95 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH Artificial Fill, undocumented (Afu)@Surface: Silty SAND to Sandy SILT, yellowish brown, slightlymoist, fine sand @4': SAND, brown, moist, fine to medium sand, few coarsesand, trace fine gravel @5': no recovery @9': Quaternary Alluvium (Qal) @10': SAND, light brown, dry to slightly moist, dense, fine tomedium sand, few coarse sand, fine gravel Notes:Total Depth: 16.5 feet bgsNo groundwater encountered during drillingTemporary percolation well installed 7/21/15Well screen: 10-15 feet bgsWell annulus: 3/4 inch gravel 10-16.5 feet bgsPercolation well removed 7/22/15Boring backfilled with soil cuttings and capped with cold patchasphalt 7/22/15 SM/ML SP SP BB-1 R-1 R-2 4 6 8 9 15 23 15 16 24 148' BULK SAMPLE CORE SAMPLEGRAB SAMPLERING SAMPLESPLIT SPOON SAMPLETUBE SAMPLE BCGR ST A.Ries Hollow Stem Auger - 140lb - Autohammer - 40" Drop 0 5 10 15 20 25 So i l C l a s s . 7-21-15 SOIL DESCRIPTION Sampled By Drilling Co.Drilling Co. Project Project No. 1969 S. State College Blvd. JPI Gene Autry 11091.001 Drilling Method 8" Sa m p l e N o . Fe e t Hole Diameter Mo i s t u r e Ground Elevation De p t h Bl o w s El e v a t i o n Pe r 6 I n c h e s Page 1 of 1 At t i t u d e s SAMPLE TYPES: 2R Drilling Co n t e n t , % GEOTECHNICAL BORING LOG LP-3 Logged By Date Drilled 145 140 135 130 125 * * * This log is a part of a report by Leighton and should not be used as a stand-alone document. * * * A.Ries Fe e t S (U . S . C . S . ) Lo g Ty p e o f T e s t s Gr a p h i c pc f Location Dr y D e n s i t y N This Soil Description applies only to a location of the exploration at the time of sampling. Subsurface conditions may differ at other locationsand may change with time. The description is a simplification of the actual conditions encountered. Transitions between soil types may begradual. TYPE OF TESTS:-200 ALCN COCRCU % FINES PASSINGATTERBERG LIMITSCONSOLIDATIONCOLLAPSECORROSIONUNDRAINED TRIAXIAL DSEIH MDPP RV DIRECT SHEAR EXPANSION INDEXHYDROMETER MAXIMUM DENSITYPOCKET PENETROMETERR VALUE SASESG UC SIEVE ANALYSISSAND EQUIVALENTSPECIFIC GRAVITYUNCONFINED COMPRESSIVE STRENGTH APPENDIX C RESULTS OF GEOTECHNICAL LABORATORY TESTING LP - 3 BB - 1 5- 1 0 Bu l k 36 8 9 . 8 23 0 . 1 34 5 9 . 7 37 . 9 0. 0 37 . 9 61 3 . 5 11 1 . 6 50 1 . 9 B 59 3 . 2 11 1 . 6 48 1 . 6 98 . 9 1. 1 4. 0 Pr o j e c t N a m e : JP I – G e n e A u t r y Pr o j e c t N o . : 11 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 Cl i e n t N a m e : JP I R e a l E s t a t e A c q u i s i t i o n , L L C Te s t e d B y : A. S a n t o s Date:07/31/15 % P a s s i n g N o . 4 S i e v e To t a l S a m p l e D r y W e i g h t D e t e r m i n a t i o n Dr y W e i g h t o f S a m p l e + C o n t . ( g ) We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) We i g h t o f D r y S a m p l e ( g ) Sa m p l e D r y W e i g h t D e t e r m i n a t i o n , R e t a i n e d o n S i e v e # 4 Sa m p l e D r y W e i g h t D e t e r m i n a t i o n , P a s s i n g S i e v e # 4 We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) Bo r i n g N o . Sa m p l e N o . De p t h ( f t . ) Sa m p l e T y p e PE R C E N T P A S S I N G No . 2 0 0 S I E V E AS T M D 1 1 4 0 Dr y W e i g h t o f S a m p l e + C o n t . ( g ) Me t h o d ( A o r B ) We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) We i g h t o f D r y S a m p l e ( g ) % P a s s i n g N o . 2 0 0 S i e v e Af t e r W a s h We i g h t o f D r y S a m p l e ( g ) Dr y W e i g h t o f S a m p l e + C o n t . ( g ) % R e t a i n e d N o . 4 S i e v e Li g h t o l i v e br o w n p o o r l y - gr a d e d s a n d (S P ) We i g h t o f C o n t a i n e r ( g ) Dr y W e i g h t o f S o i l ( g ) So i l I d e n t i f i c a t i o n Dr y W e i g h t o f S o i l + C o n t a i n e r ( g ) No M o i s t u r e C o r r e c t i o n ; A S T M D 1 1 4 0 m o d i f i e d t o i n c l u d e s p l i t t i n g t h e s a m p l e o n t h e # 4 s i e v e -200 LP-3, BB-1 @ 5-10 Project Name:Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:Depth (ft.): Sample No.:Sample Type:Ring Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 161.78 44.10 0.9668 157.53 152.10 38.62 4.8 93.4 16 0.3397 364.31 338.48 182.49 23.09 96.3 83 0.3031 2.70 62.43 0.10 0.3394 0.9997 0.00 0.03 0.804 0.03 0.20 0.3383 0.9986 0.01 0.14 0.802 0.13 0.40 0.3360 0.9963 0.10 0.37 0.800 0.27 0.80 0.3329 0.9932 0.22 0.68 0.796 0.46 0.40 0.3336 0.9939 0.10 0.61 0.795 0.51 0.20 0.3341 0.9944 0.01 0.56 0.795 0.55 0.40 0.3334 0.9937 0.10 0.64 0.795 0.54 0.80 0.3317 0.9920 0.22 0.81 0.794 0.59 0.80 0.3295 0.9898 0.22 1.02 0.790 0.80 1.60 0.3228 0.9831 0.39 1.69 0.781 1.30 3.20 0.3119 0.9722 0.59 2.78 0.765 2.19 6.40 0.3003 0.9606 0.81 3.94 0.748 3.13 12.80 0.2864 0.9467 1.07 5.34 0.728 4.27 3.20 0.2909 0.9512 0.76 4.89 0.730 4.13 0.80 0.2971 0.9574 0.52 4.26 0.737 3.74 0.20 0.3031 0.9634 0.34 3.66 0.745 3.32 Pressure (p) (ksf) Final Reading (in.) Apparent Thickness (in.) Load Compliance (%) Deformation % of Sample Thickness Void Ratio Corrected Deforma- tion (%) No Time Readings Date Time Elapsed Time (min) Square Root of Time Dial Rdgs. (in.) Sample Diameter (in.) Sample Thickness (in.) Wt. of Sample + Ring (g) Weight of Ring (g) After Test Height after consol. (in.) Wt.Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt.of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Before Test Initial Moisture Content (%) Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Saturation (%) Initial Vertical Reading (in.) Wt.of Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt. of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Final Moisture Content (%) Water Density (pcf) Final Dry Density (pcf) Final Saturation (%) Final Vertical Reading (in.) Specific Gravity (assumed) JPI – Gene Autry ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 Olive brown silty sand (SM) 5.0 R-1 11091.001 LP-1 0.720 0.730 0.740 0.750 0.760 0.770 0.780 0.790 0.800 0.810 0.10 1.00 10.00 100. Vo i d R a t i o Pressure, p (ksf) Inundate with Tap water Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final No Time Readings 0.745 16 8393.4 Degree of Saturation (%)Dry Density (pcf) 0.805 Void Ratio 5.0 4.8 Soil Identification: Olive brown silty sand (SM) Project No.: JPI – Gene Autry 08-15 11091.001 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft.) Moisture Content (%) ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 23.1 96.3LP-1 R-1 0.2920 0.3420 0.3920 0.4420 0.4920 0.5420 0.5920 0.1 1.0 De f o r m a t i o n D i a l R e a d i n g ( i n . ) Log of Time (min.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.500.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 De f o r m a t i o n ( % ) Pressure, p (ksf) 0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 0.3500 0.4000 0.4500 0.5000 0.5500 0.0 10.0 Square Root of Time (min.1/2) Inundate with Tap water Project Name:Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:Depth (ft.): Sample No.:Sample Type:Ring Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 168.12 42.41 0.9776 192.41 189.26 50.55 2.3 102.2 9 0.3344 370.24 348.83 184.63 17.58 103.6 76 0.3104 2.70 62.43 0.10 0.3341 0.9997 0.00 0.03 0.648 0.03 0.20 0.3333 0.9989 0.05 0.11 0.648 0.06 0.40 0.3318 0.9974 0.11 0.26 0.646 0.15 0.80 0.3299 0.9955 0.18 0.46 0.644 0.28 0.40 0.3304 0.9960 0.11 0.41 0.644 0.30 0.20 0.3309 0.9965 0.05 0.35 0.644 0.30 0.40 0.3302 0.9958 0.11 0.42 0.644 0.31 0.80 0.3292 0.9948 0.18 0.52 0.643 0.34 0.80 0.3285 0.9941 0.18 0.59 0.642 0.41 1.60 0.3247 0.9903 0.27 0.97 0.637 0.70 3.20 0.3182 0.9838 0.38 1.62 0.628 1.24 6.40 0.3108 0.9764 0.53 2.36 0.619 1.83 12.80 0.3007 0.9663 0.76 3.37 0.606 2.61 3.20 0.3043 0.9699 0.44 3.01 0.607 2.57 0.80 0.3076 0.9732 0.29 2.68 0.609 2.39 0.20 0.3104 0.9760 0.16 2.40 0.612 2.24 Pressure (p) (ksf) Final Reading (in.) Apparent Thickness (in.) Load Compliance (%) Deformation % of Sample Thickness Void Ratio Corrected Deforma- tion (%) No Time Readings Date Time Elapsed Time (min) Square Root of Time Dial Rdgs. (in.) Sample Diameter (in.) Sample Thickness (in.) Wt. of Sample + Ring (g) Weight of Ring (g) After Test Height after consol. (in.) Wt.Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt.of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Before Test Initial Moisture Content (%) Initial Dry Density (pcf) Initial Saturation (%) Initial Vertical Reading (in.) Wt.of Wet Sample+Cont. (g) Wt. of Dry Sample+Cont. (g) Weight of Container (g) Final Moisture Content (%) Water Density (pcf) Final Dry Density (pcf) Final Saturation (%) Final Vertical Reading (in.) Specific Gravity (assumed) JPI – Gene Autry ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) 10.0 R-2 11091.001 LP-2 0.600 0.610 0.620 0.630 0.640 0.650 0.660 0.10 1.00 10.00 100. Vo i d R a t i o Pressure, p (ksf) Inundate with Tap water Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final Initial Final No Time Readings 0.612 9 76102.2 Degree of Saturation (%)Dry Density (pcf) 0.649 Void Ratio 10.0 2.3 Soil Identification: Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Project No.: JPI – Gene Autry 08-15 11091.001 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft.) Moisture Content (%) ONE-DIMENSIONAL CONSOLIDATION PROPERTIES of SOILS ASTM D 2435 17.6 103.6LP-2 R-2 0.2920 0.3420 0.3920 0.4420 0.4920 0.5420 0.5920 0.1 1.0 De f o r m a t i o n D i a l R e a d i n g ( i n . ) Log of Time (min.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.000.10 1.00 10.00 100.00 De f o r m a t i o n ( % ) Pressure, p (ksf) 0.0000 0.0500 0.1000 0.1500 0.2000 0.2500 0.3000 0.3500 0.4000 0.4500 0.5000 0.5500 0.0 10.0 Square Root of Time (min.1/2) Inundate with Tap water Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By :G. Berdy Date:07/28/15 Project No. :11091.001 Data Input By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.LP-3 LB-3 Sample No.BB-1 BB-1 Sample Depth (ft)5-10 0-5 253.02 270.05 251.00 265.21 57.98 65.19 1.05 2.42 100.79 100.81 60 62 51 850 850 11:20/11:55 11:20/11:55 35 35 21.7569 20.2983 21.7546 20.2952 0.0023 0.0031 94.65 127.56 96 131 ml of Extract For Titration (B)30 30 ml of AgNO3 Soln. Used in Titration (C)0.5 0.5 PPM of Chloride (C -0.2) * 100 * 30 / B 30 30 PPM of Chloride, Dry Wt. Basis 30 31 7.50 8.02 20.7 20.8 TESTS for SULFATE CONTENT CHLORIDE CONTENT and pH of SOILS SULFATE CONTENT, DOT California Test 417, Part II Soil Identification: Moisture Content (%) Temperature °C pH Value Olive silty sand (SM) pH TEST, DOT California Test 643 CHLORIDE CONTENT, DOT California Test 422 Time In / Time Out Weight of Soaked Soil (g) Light olive brown SP Wt. of Crucible + Residue (g) Wet Weight of Soil + Container (g) Dry Weight of Soil + Container (g) Weight of Container (g) Duration of Combustion (min) Beaker No. Crucible No. Furnace Temperature (°C) PPM of Sulfate (A) x 41150 PPM of Sulfate, Dry Weight Basis Wt. of Crucible (g) Wt. of Residue (g) (A) Project Name:Tested By : G. Berdy Date: Project No. :Data Input By: J. Ward Date: Boring No.:Depth (ft.) : Sample No. : Dry Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) 7800 Soil Identification:* *California Test 643 requires soil specimens to consist only of portions of samples passing through the No. 8 US Standard Sieve before resistivity testing. Therefore, this test method may not be representative for coarser materials. Wt. of Container (g)16.58 7800 1.05 253.02 Moisture Content (%) (MCi) Wet Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g)Specimen No. 1 2 Water Added (ml) (Wa) 20 Adjusted Moisture Content (MC) DOT CA Test 643 1.000 Chloride Content (ohm-cm) Moisture Content Sulfate Content 5 Min. Resistivity DOT CA Test 643DOT CA Test 417 Part II DOT CA Test 422 (%)(ppm)(ppm) 4 30 40 130.103560032.11 5500 5350 26.8 96 30 7.50 20.7 SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST DOT CA TEST 643 Temp. (°C)pH Soil pH 5500 5600 251.00 57.98 MC =(((1+Mci/100)x(Wa/Wt+1))-1)x100 JPI – Gene Autry 07/29/15 08/08/15 5-10 11091.001 LP-3 BB-1 Container No. Initial Soil Wt. (g) (Wt) Box Constant Light olive brown SP Resistance Reading (ohm) 24.35 Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) 5000 5500 6000 6500 7000 7500 8000 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 So i l R e s i s t i v i t y ( o h m - c m ) Moisture Content (%) Project Name:Tested By : G. Berdy Date: Project No. :Data Input By: J. Ward Date: Boring No.:Depth (ft.) : Sample No. : BB-1 Moisture Content (%) (MCi) Wet Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) 20 Soil Identification:* Dry Wt. of Soil + Cont. (g) Wt. of Container (g) *California Test 643 requires soil specimens to consist only of portions of samples passing through the No. 8 US Standard Sieve before resistivity testing. Therefore, this test method may not be representative for coarser materials. 2.42 JPI – Gene Autry 07/28/15 08/08/15 0-5 11091.001 LB-3 270.05 265.21 65.19 20.8 Soil Resistivity (ohm-cm) Box Constant SOIL RESISTIVITY TEST DOT CA TEST 643 Temp. (°C)pH Soil pH 1.000 130.00 3150 3200 3125 28.5 131 31 8.02 DOT CA Test 643DOT CA Test 417 Part II DOT CA Test 422DOT CA Test 643 Specimen No. 1 2 3 350018.18 3500 Resistance Reading (ohm) Adjusted Moisture Content (MC) Water Added (ml) (Wa) Initial Soil Wt. (g) (Wt) 5 3200 3500 Container No.315026.06 MC =(((1+Mci/100)x(Wa/Wt+1))-1)x100 4 Sulfate Content Chloride Content (ohm-cm) (%) (ppm) (ppm) Min. Resistivity Moisture Content Olive silty sand (SM) 3500 30 40 50 33.93 41.81 3000 3100 3200 3300 3400 3500 3600 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0 45.0 So i l R e s i s t i v i t y ( o h m - c m ) Moisture Content (%) Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/02/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:Depth (ft.):35.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 174.62 42.27 Before Shearing 175.42 170.08 37.66 0.0000 -0.0169 After Shearing 178.72 158.73 39.27 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-4 LB-3 Olive brown poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-4 @ 35 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 R-4 35 Soil Identification:4.03 105.8 1.000 2.415 4.200 3.694 2.685 0.0500 18.4 0.9831 16.7 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 08-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Olive brown poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-4 @ 35 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/02/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:Depth (ft.):55.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 186.25 43.84 Before Shearing 199.98 179.54 37.76 0.2782 0.3004 After Shearing 198.17 174.35 52.74 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-6 LB-3 Olive brown silt with sand (ML)s Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-6 @ 55 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 R-6 55 Soil Identification:14.42 103.5 1.000 2.415 6.600 5.596 4.467 0.0500 61.9 0.9778 19.6 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 08-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Olive brown silt with sand (ML)s 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00 7.00 8.00 9.00 10.00 11.00 12.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LB-3, R-6 @ 55 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:Depth (ft.):5.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 185.75 44.73 Before Shearing 184.15 176.28 38.02 0.0000 -0.0046 After Shearing 184.73 166.55 37.71 2.70 62.43Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-1 LP-2 Olive brown silty sand (SM) Sample Diameter(in): DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-1 @ 5 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) 07-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Olive brown silty sand (SM) 29.6 0.9954 14.1 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 1.000 2.415 0.600 0.692 0.494 0.0500 Soil Identification:5.69 111.0 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-2 R-1 5 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-1 @ 5 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/28/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:Depth (ft.):20.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 180.73 43.75 Before Shearing 177.15 174.06 37.35 0.2459 0.2585 After Shearing 186.79 168.53 39.09 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-4 LP-2 Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-4 @ 20 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-2 R-4 20 Soil Identification:2.26 111.4 1.000 2.415 2.400 2.864 1.817 0.0500 11.9 0.9874 14.1 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 07-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light yellowish brown poorly- graded sand (SP) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-4 @ 20 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:Depth (ft.):25.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 168.72 42.83 Before Shearing 181.31 177.70 53.71 0.2401 0.2533 After Shearing 182.06 157.61 39.52 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-5 LP-2 Light olive brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-5 @ 25 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-2 R-5 25 Soil Identification:2.91 101.7 1.000 2.415 3.000 2.773 1.987 0.0500 12.0 0.9868 20.7 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 07-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light olive brown poorly- graded sand (SP) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-2, R-5 @ 25 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:Depth (ft.):10.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 158.40 43.90 Before Shearing 219.96 218.09 65.23 0.2460 0.2577 After Shearing 187.93 161.01 52.75 2.70 62.43Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-1 LP-3 Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-1 @ 10 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) 07-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light yellowish brown poorly- graded sand (SP)4.2 0.9883 24.9 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 1.000 2.415 1.200 1.063 0.783 0.0500 Soil Identification:1.22 94.1 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-3 R-1 10 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-1 @ 10 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.: Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:Depth (ft.):15.0 Soil Identification: 2.415 1.000 176.43 41.88 Before Shearing 214.76 211.78 65.79 0.0000 -0.0167 After Shearing 198.90 178.58 53.84 2.70 62.43 Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): R-2 LP-3 Light olive brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-2 @ 15 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LP-3 R-2 15 Soil Identification:2.04 109.7 1.000 2.415 1.800 1.855 1.320 0.0500 10.3 0.9833 16.3 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 07-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: Ring Light olive brown poorly- graded sand (SP) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS (1 pt) LP-3, R-2 @ 15 Project Name:JPI – Gene Autry Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/03/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Boring No.:Sample Type:93% Remold Sample No.:Depth (ft.):0-5 Soil Identification: 2.415 2.415 2.415 1.000 1.000 1.000 200.31 200.29 199.79 43.62 43.51 43.09 Before Shearing 249.51 249.51 249.51 233.50 233.50 233.50 38.71 38.71 38.71 0.2405 0.0000 0.2666 0.2460 -0.0083 0.2886 After Shearing 200.04 199.57 199.39 181.03 180.90 181.36 38.07 37.50 37.77 2.70 2.70 2.70 62.43 62.43 62.43 Sample Diameter(in): Water Density(pcf): Specific Gravity (Assumed): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Ring(gm): Weight of Container(gm): Weight of Dry Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Weight of Wet Sample+Cont.(gm): Vertical Rdg.(in): Final Vertical Rdg.(in): Initial DIRECT SHEAR TEST Consolidated Undrained Sample Thickness(in.): Weight of Sample + ring(gm): BB-1 LB-3 Olive silty sand (SM) DS LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Dry Density (pcf) Saturation (%) Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Final Moisture Content (%) 120.4 1.000 2.415 8.22 Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 BB-1 0-5 55.6 0.9917 13.0 Soil Identification:8.22 120.5 8.22 120.4 1.742 0.0500 4.000 3.219 2.899 0.0500 1.000 1.254 0.915 0.0500 1.000 2.415 1.000 2.415 2.000 2.223 55.5 0.9945 13.3 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 55.5 0.9780 12.6 08-15 Project No.:11091.001 Sample Type: 93% Remold Olive silty sand (SM) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 4.50 5.00 5.50 6.00 6.50 7.00 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Normal Stress (kip/ft²) Peak Shear Stress (kip/ft²) Shear Stress @ End of Test (ksf) Sample Type: 93% Remold Deformation Rate (in./min.) Initial Sample Height (in.) Diameter (in.) Initial Moisture Content (%) Strength Parameters Dry Density (pcf) C (psf) (o)Saturation (%) Peak 756.0 32.3 Soil Height Before Shearing (in.) Ultimate 336.5 33.0 Final Moisture Content (%) 08-15 Project No.:11091.001 55.5 0.9945 1.000 13.3 JPI – Gene AutryDIRECT SHEAR TEST RESULTS Consolidated Undrained 1.000 1.254 0.915 0.0500 8.22 120.4 2.415 Soil Identification: 0.9780 8.22 12.6 1.000 2.415 0.9917 13.0 120.4 1.000 2.415 55.6 8.22 120.5 0.0500 4.000 3.219 2.899 0.0500 55.5 2.000 Olive silty sand (SM) Boring No. Sample No. Depth (ft) LB-3 BB-1 0-5 2.223 1.742 0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 0 0.1 0.2 0.3 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Horizontal Deformation (in.) 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0 4.0 Sh e a r S t r e s s ( k s f ) Normal Stress (ksf) DS LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Tested By:O. Figueroa Date:07/31/15 Input By: J. Ward Date:08/03/15 Depth (ft.):0-5 X Moist Rammer Weight (lb.) =10.0 Dry #3/4 Height of Drop (in.) =18.0 X #3/8 #4 6.9 0.03340 123456 3858 3969 3975 1861 1861 1861 1997 2108 2114 416.5 429.0 438.7 396.8 401.1 401.2 51.3 53.3 54.0 5.70 8.02 10.80 131.8 139.1 139.5 124.7 128.8 125.9 129.0 8.5 131.0 8.0 X Procedure A Soil Passing No. 4 (4.75 mm) Sieve Mold : 4 in. (101.6 mm) diameter Layers : 5 (Five) Blows per layer : 25 (twenty-five) May be used if +#4 is 20% or less Procedure B Soil Passing 3/8 in. (9.5 mm) Sieve Mold : 4 in. (101.6 mm) diameter Layers : 5 (Five) Blows per layer : 25 (twenty-five) Use if +#4 is >20% and +3/8 in. is 20% or less Procedure C Soil Passing 3/4 in. (19.0 mm) Sieve Mold : 6 in. (152.4 mm) diameter Layers : 5 (Five) Blows per layer : 56 (fifty-six) Use if +3/8 in. is >20% and +¾ in. is <30% Particle-Size Distribution:7:63:30GR:SA:FIAtterberg Limits: LL,PL,PI Corrected Dry Density (pcf) Preparation Method: Dry Density (pcf) Mechanical Ram Net Weight of Soil (g) Wet Density (pcf) Moisture Content (%) Wet Weight of Soil + Cont. (g) Project No.: Boring No.: Sample No.: Olive silty sand (SM) Scalp Fraction (%) Maximum Dry Density (pcf) Note: Corrected dry density calculation assumes specific gravity of 2.70 and moisture content of 1.0% for oversize particles Optimum Moisture Content (%) Corrected Moisture Content (%) Mold Volume (ft³) TEST NO. Weight of Container (g) Manual Ram Dry Weight of Soil + Cont. (g) Compaction Method MODIFIED PROCTOR COMPACTION TEST ASTM D 1557 Weight of Mold (g) JPI – Gene Autry LB-3 Wt. Compacted Soil + Mold (g) BB-1 Soil Identification: 11091.001 Project Name: 110.0 115.0 120.0 125.0 130.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20 Dr y D e n s i t y ( p c f ) Moisture Content (%) SP. GR. = 2.65 SP. GR. = 2.70 SP. GR. = 2.75 MX LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Project Name:Tested By:A. Santos Date:07/31/15 Project No.:11091.001 Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LB-3 Depth (feet):0-5 Sample No.:BB-1 Soil Identification:Olive silty sand (SM) Whole Sample Sample Passing #4 Whole Sample Sample passing #4 ES-2 4-C Wt. of Air-Dry Soil + Cont.(g) 0.00 0.00 2340.2 616.4 Wt. of Dry Soil + Cont. (g) 0.00 0.00 230.6 109.1 Wt. of Container No._____(g) 1.00 1.00 2109.6 507.3 Moisture Content (%)0.00 0.00 4-C 451.7 109.1 342.6 (mm.) 1" 3/4" 1/2" 3/8" #4 #8 #16 #30 #50 #100 #200 GRAVEL:7% SAND:63 % FINES:30 % GROUP SYMBOL:SM Remarks: 282.4 5.3 145.0 0.150 0.075 23.7 341.7 130.8 PAN 4.75 2.36 1.18 0.600 56.6 214.3 0.0 0.300 15.1 9.5 19.0 Wt. of Dry Soil + Container (g) Wt. of Container (g) 41.3 12.5 Whole Sample 82.7 69.1 Wt. Air-Dried Soil + Cont.(g) 93.1 90.3 30.4 100.0 99.7 Sample Passing #4 Passing #4 Material After Wet Sieve PARTICLE-SIZE DISTRIBUTION (GRADATION) ASTM D 6913 Container No.: JPI – Gene Autry Moisture ContentsCalculation of Dry Weights of SOILS USING SIEVE ANALYSIS 53.8 Wt. of Container (g) Percent Passing (%) Cu = D60/D10 = Cc = (D30)²/(D60*D10) = Dry Wt. of Soil Retained on # 200 Sieve (g) Container No. Dry Wt. of Soil (g) 98.9 Cumulative Weight of Dry Soil Retained (g)U. S. Sieve Size 25.0 Pr o j e c t N a m e : 7 : 6 3 : 3 0 BB - 1 08/08/15 Bo r i n g N o . : De p t h ( f e e t ) : 0 - 5 So i l T y p e : P A R T I C L E - S I Z E DI S T R I B U T I O N AS T M D 6 9 1 3 So i l I d e n t i f i c a t i o n : Ol i v e s i l t y s a n d ( S M ) SM GR : S A : F I : ( % ) JP I – G e n e A u t r y Pr o j e c t N o . : LB - 3 Sa m p l e N o . : 11 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 SA N D SI L T F I N E HY D R O M E T E R 3 . 0 " 1 1 / 2 " 3 / 4 " 3 / 8 " # 4 # 8 # 1 6 # 3 0 # 5 0 # 1 0 0 # 2 0 0 U. S . S T A N D A R D S I E V E O P E N I N G U . S . S T A N D A R D S I E V E N U M B E R GR A V E L FI N E S FI N E CLAY C O A R S E C O A R S E M E D I U M 0102030405060708090 10 0 0.001 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 0 0 1. 0 0 0 10 . 0 0 0 10 0 . 0 0 0 P E R C E N T F I N E R B Y W E I G H T PA R T I C L E - S I Z E ( m m ) " SA LB-3, BB-1 @ 0-5 Pr o j e c t N a m e : Te s t e d B y : A. S a n t o s Date:07/31/15 Pr o j e c t N o . : In p u t B y : J. W a r d Date:08/08/15 12 : 5 5 13 : 0 5 1 3 : 0 7 1 3 : 2 7 5. 7 4 . 1 72 12 : 5 9 1 3 : 0 9 1 3 : 1 1 1 3 : 3 1 6. 0 4 . 2 70 13 : 0 3 1 3 : 1 3 1 3 : 1 5 1 3 : 3 5 6. 0 4 . 3 72 T1 = S t a r t i n g T i m e T 3 = S e t t l e m e n t S t a r t i n g T i m e S a n d E q u i v a l e n t = R 2 / R 1 * 1 0 0 T2 = ( T 1 + 1 0 m i n ) B e g i n A g i t a t i o n T 4 = ( T 3 + 2 0 m i n ) T a ke C l a y R e a d i n g ( R 1 ) R e c o r d S E a s N e x t H i g h e r I n t e g e r (1 3 1 c y c l e s i n 4 5 s e c ) a n d S a n d R e a d i n g ( R 2 ) T2 T 3 So i l T y p e SE R1 R 2 T1 A vera g e SE Li g h t o l i v e b r o w n p o o r l y - gr a d e d s a n d ( S P ) BB - 1 5 - 1 0 LP - 3 SA N D E Q U I V A L E N T T E S T DO T C A T e s t 2 1 7 Bo r i n g N o . S a m p l e N o . D e p t h ( f t . ) 72 JP I – G e n e A u t r y 11 0 9 1 . 0 0 1 T4 SE LP-3, BB-1 @ 5-10 Project Name:Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/04/15 Project No.: Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LB-3 Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:R-3 Depth (ft.)25.0 Sample Description:Olive brown poorly-graded sand with silt (SP-SM) Initial Dry Density (pcf):110.1 Final Dry Density (pcf):111.1 Initial Moisture (%):3.76 Final Moisture (%) :15.2 Initial Length (in.):1.0000 Initial Void Ratio:0.5308 Initial Dial Reading:0.3033 Specific Gravity(assumed):2.70 Diameter(in):2.415 Initial Saturation (%)19.1 0.100 0.9999 0.00 -0.01 -0.01 3.000 0.9870 0.55 -1.30 -0.75 H2O 0.9852 0.55 -1.48 -0.93 Percent Swell (+) / Settlement (-) After Inundation =-0.18 0.5166 0.3032 0.2903 0.2885 Pressure (p) (ksf) 0.5307 0.5193 Final Reading (in)Void Ratio Swell (+) Settlement (-) % of Sample Thickness Load Compliance (%) Apparent Thickness (in) ONE-DIMENSIONAL SWELL OR SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF COHESIVE SOILS ASTM D 4546 Corrected Deformation (%) JPI – Gene Autry 11091.001 0.5140 0.5160 0.5180 0.5200 0.5220 0.5240 0.5260 0.5280 0.5300 0.5320 0.100 1.000 10.000 Vo i d R a t i o Log Pressure (ksf) Void Ratio - Log Pressure Curve Inundate withTap water Swell-Settlement LB-3, R-3 @ 25 Project Name:Tested By:G. Bathala Date:08/04/15 Project No.: Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LP-2 Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:R-3 Depth (ft.)15.0 Sample Description:Light olive brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Initial Dry Density (pcf):100.8 Final Dry Density (pcf):101.5 Initial Moisture (%):3.72 Final Moisture (%) :17.6 Initial Length (in.):1.0000 Initial Void Ratio:0.6722 Initial Dial Reading:0.2920 Specific Gravity(assumed):2.70 Diameter(in):2.415 Initial Saturation (%)15.0 0.100 0.9998 0.00 -0.02 -0.02 1.500 0.9911 0.39 -0.89 -0.50 H2O 0.9891 0.39 -1.09 -0.70 Percent Swell (+) / Settlement (-) After Inundation =-0.20 0.6605 0.2918 0.2831 0.2811 Pressure (p) (ksf) 0.6719 0.6638 Final Reading (in)Void Ratio Swell (+) Settlement (-) % of Sample Thickness Load Compliance (%) Apparent Thickness (in) ONE-DIMENSIONAL SWELL OR SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF COHESIVE SOILS ASTM D 4546 Corrected Deformation (%) JPI – Gene Autry 11091.001 0.6580 0.6600 0.6620 0.6640 0.6660 0.6680 0.6700 0.6720 0.6740 0.100 1.000 10.000 Vo i d R a t i o Log Pressure (ksf) Void Ratio - Log Pressure Curve Inundate with Tap water Swell-Settlement LP-2, R-3 @ 15 Project Name:Tested By:G. Bathala Date:07/30/15 Project No.: Checked By:J. Ward Date:08/08/15 Boring No.:LP-2 Sample Type:Ring Sample No.:R-4 Depth (ft.)20.0 Sample Description:Light yellowish brown poorly-graded sand (SP) Initial Dry Density (pcf):105.0 Final Dry Density (pcf):106.1 Initial Moisture (%):2.26 Final Moisture (%) :15.5 Initial Length (in.):1.0000 Initial Void Ratio:0.6049 Initial Dial Reading:0.2741 Specific Gravity(assumed):2.70 Diameter(in):2.415 Initial Saturation (%)10.1 0.100 0.9997 0.00 -0.03 -0.03 2.400 0.9879 0.40 -1.21 -0.81 H2O 0.9856 0.40 -1.44 -1.04 Percent Swell (+) / Settlement (-) After Inundation =-0.23 0.5882 0.2738 0.2620 0.2597 Pressure (p) (ksf) 0.6045 0.5919 Final Reading (in)Void Ratio Swell (+) Settlement (-) % of Sample Thickness Load Compliance (%) Apparent Thickness (in) ONE-DIMENSIONAL SWELL OR SETTLEMENT POTENTIAL OF COHESIVE SOILS ASTM D 4546 Corrected Deformation (%) JPI – Gene Autry 11091.001 0.5860 0.5880 0.5900 0.5920 0.5940 0.5960 0.5980 0.6000 0.6020 0.6040 0.6060 0.100 1.000 10.000 Vo i d R a t i o Log Pressure (ksf) Void Ratio - Log Pressure Curve Inundate withTap water Swell-Settlement LP-2, R-4 @ 20 APPENDIX D PERCOLATION DATA RESULTS Earth Description: Quaternary alluvium (Qal)Date Tested: 7/22/15 Liquid Description: tap water Depth of boring (ft):10 Diameter of boring (in):8 Time Interval Standard Diameter of casing (in):2 Start Time for Pre-Soak:7/21/2015 14:04 Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard:7/22/2015 11:29 Depth to Initial Water Depth (ft): 5.10 10 min Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 10 min Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 11:29 5.10 58.8 11:39 7.42 31.0 11:38 5.12 58.6 11:48 7.12 34.6 11:50 5.15 58.2 12:00 7.20 33.6 12:02 5.13 58.4 12:13 7.32 32.2 12:14 5.12 58.6 12:24 7.15 34.2 12:26 5.13 58.4 12:36 7.13 34.4 Infiltration Rate, I (Average of Last 3 Readings) =2.36 in./hr. Flow Volume =Volume Inside of Pipe (V1) + Volume in Annular Space (V2) V1 =π(rcasing)2Δd V2 =nπ[(rboring)2-(rcasing)2]Δd Flow Area =2π(rboring)Haverage+π(rboring)2 Haverage =(Ho+Hf)/2 Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet Project Number: 11091.001 Test Hole Number: LP-1 Project Name: Jefferson Stadium Park Date Excavated: 7/21/15 Tested By: CD Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data 1 10 27.8 0.36 2.78 2 10 24.0 0.42 2.32 3 10 24.6 0.41 2.41 2.32 4 11 26.3 0.42 2.37 5 10 24.4 0.41 2.36 Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 6 10 24.0 0.42 Earth Description: Quaternary alluvium (Qal)Date Tested: 7/22/15 Liquid Description: tap water Depth of boring (ft):25 Diameter of boring (in):8 Time Interval Standard Diameter of casing (in):2 Start Time for Pre-Soak:7/21/2015 14:04 Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard:7/22/2015 11:57 Depth to Initial Water Depth (ft): 21.80 10 min Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 10 min Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 11:57 20.18 57.8 12:08 23.25 21.0 12:09 20.15 58.2 12:19 22.92 25.0 12:21 20.20 57.6 12:31 22.90 25.2 12:33 20.20 57.6 12:43 22.70 27.6 12:44 20.17 58.0 12:54 22.75 27.0 12:57 20.15 58.2 13:07 22.71 27.5 Infiltration Rate, I (Average of Last 3 Readings) =3.28 in./hr. Flow Volume =Volume Inside of Pipe (V1) + Volume in Annular Space (V2) V1 =π(rcasing)2Δd V2 =nπ[(rboring)2-(rcasing)2]Δd Flow Area =2π(rboring)Haverage+π(rboring)2 Haverage =(Ho+Hf)/2 Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet Project Number: 11091.001 Test Hole Number: LP-2 Project Name: Jefferson Stadium Park Date Excavated: 7/21/15 Tested By: CD Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data 11 36.8 0.301 10 33.2 0.30 3.58 3.79 10 30.0 0.33 3.15 10 32.4 0.31 3.50 10 31.0 0.32 3.26 10 30.7 0.33 3.21 Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 2 3 4 5 6 Earth Description: Quaternary alluvium (Qal)Date Tested: 7/22/15 Liquid Description: tap water Depth of boring (ft):15 Diameter of boring (in):8 Time Interval Standard Diameter of casing (in):2 Start Time for Pre-Soak:7/21/2015 13:14:00 PM Length of slotted of casing (ft):5 Start Time for Standard:7/22/2015 13:04 Depth to Initial Water Depth (ft): 10.15 10 min Porosity of Annulus Material, n :0.35 5 min Reading Time Time Interval, Δt (min.) Initial/Final Depth to Water (ft.) Initial/Final Water Height, H0/Hf (in.) Total Water Drop, Δd (in.) Percolation Rate (min./in.) Infiltration Rate (in./hr.) 13:04 10.15 58.2 13:09 14.05 11.4 13:12 10.15 58.2 13:17 13.92 13.0 13:19 10.15 58.2 13:24 13.87 13.6 13:26 10.10 58.8 13:31 13.85 13.8 13:33 10.10 58.8 13:38 13.90 13.2 13:40 10.17 58.0 13:45 13.97 12.4 Infiltration Rate, I (Average of Last 3 Readings) =11.20 in./hr. Flow Volume =Volume Inside of Pipe (V1) + Volume in Annular Space (V2) V1 =π(rcasing)2Δd V2 =nπ[(rboring)2-(rcasing)2]Δd Flow Area =2π(rboring)Haverage+π(rboring)2 Haverage =(Ho+Hf)/2 Infiltration Rate (I) = Flow Volume/Flow Area/Δt 5 5 45.6 0.11 11.25 6 5 45.6 0.11 11.50 4 5 45.0 0.11 11.02 3 5 44.6 0.11 11.05 11.92 2 5 45.2 0.11 11.29 Standard Time Interval Between Readings, mins: Percolation Data 1 5 46.8 0.11 Boring Percolation Test Data Sheet Project Number: 11091.001 Test Hole Number: LP-3 Project Name: Jefferson Stadium Park Date Excavated: 7/21/15 Tested By: CD APPENDIX E SEISMIC DESIGN ANALYSIS 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…1/6 From Figure 22-1 [1] From Figure 22-2 [2] Design Maps Detailed Report ASCE 7-10 Standard (33.7989°N, 117.8902°W) Site Class D – “Stiff Soil”, Risk Category I/II/III Section 11.4.1 — Mapped Acceleration Parameters Note: Ground motion values provided below are for the direction of maximum horizontal spectral response acceleration. They have been converted from corresponding geometric mean ground motions computed by the USGS by applying factors of 1.1 (to obtain SS) and 1.3 (to obtain S1). Maps in the 2010 ASCE-7 Standard are provided for Site Class B. Adjustments for other Site Classes are made, as needed, in Section 11.4.3. SS = 1.492 g S1 = 0.543 g Section 11.4.2 — Site Class The authority having jurisdiction (not the USGS), site-specific geotechnical data, and/or the default has classified the site as Site Class D, based on the site soil properties in accordance with Chapter 20. Table 20.3–1 Site Classification Site Class vS N or Nch su A. Hard Rock >5,000 ft/s N/A N/A B. Rock 2,500 to 5,000 ft/s N/A N/A C. Very dense soil and soft rock 1,200 to 2,500 ft/s >50 >2,000 psf D. Stiff Soil 600 to 1,200 ft/s 15 to 50 1,000 to 2,000 psf E. Soft clay soil <600 ft/s <15 <1,000 psf Any profile with more than 10 ft of soil having the characteristics: Plasticity index PI > 20, Moisture content w ≥ 40%, and Undrained shear strength su < 500 psf F. Soils requiring site response analysis in accordance with Section 21.1 See Section 20.3.1 For SI: 1ft/s = 0.3048 m/s 1lb/ft² = 0.0479 kN/m² 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…2/6 Section 11.4.3 — Site Coefficients and Risk–Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Spectral Response Acceleration Parameters Table 11.4–1: Site Coefficient Fa Site Class Mapped MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at Short Period SS ≤ 0.25 SS = 0.50 SS = 0.75 SS = 1.00 SS ≥ 1.25 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight–line interpolation for intermediate values of SS For Site Class = D and SS = 1.492 g, Fa = 1.000 Table 11.4–2: Site Coefficient Fv Site Class Mapped MCE R Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter at 1–s Period S1 ≤ 0.10 S1 = 0.20 S1 = 0.30 S1 = 0.40 S1 ≥ 0.50 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.7 1.6 1.5 1.4 1.3 D 2.4 2.0 1.8 1.6 1.5 E 3.5 3.2 2.8 2.4 2.4 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight–line interpolation for intermediate values of S1 For Site Class = D and S1 = 0.543 g, Fv = 1.500 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…3/6 Equation (11.4–1): Equation (11.4–2): Equation (11.4–3): Equation (11.4–4): From Figure 22-12 [3] SMS = FaSS = 1.000 x 1.492 = 1.492 g SM1 = FvS1 = 1.500 x 0.543 = 0.814 g Section 11.4.4 — Design Spectral Acceleration Parameters SDS = ⅔ SMS = ⅔ x 1.492 = 0.995 g SD1 = ⅔ SM1 = ⅔ x 0.814 = 0.543 g Section 11.4.5 — Design Response Spectrum TL = 8 seconds Figure 11.4–1: Design Response Spectrum 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…4/6 Section 11.4.6 — Risk-Targeted Maximum Considered Earthquake (MCER) Response Spectrum The MCER Response Spectrum is determined by multiplying the design response spectrum above by 1.5. 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…5/6 From Figure 22-7 [4] Equation (11.8–1): From Figure 22-17 [5] From Figure 22-18 [6] Section 11.8.3 — Additional Geotechnical Investigation Report Requirements for Seismic Design Categories D through F PGA = 0.502 PGAM = FPGAPGA = 1.000 x 0.502 = 0.502 g Table 11.8–1: Site Coefficient FPGA Site Class Mapped MCE Geometric Mean Peak Ground Acceleration, PGA PGA ≤ 0.10 PGA = 0.20 PGA = 0.30 PGA = 0.40 PGA ≥ 0.50 A 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 0.8 B 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 C 1.2 1.2 1.1 1.0 1.0 D 1.6 1.4 1.2 1.1 1.0 E 2.5 1.7 1.2 0.9 0.9 F See Section 11.4.7 of ASCE 7 Note: Use straight–line interpolation for intermediate values of PGA For Site Class = D and PGA = 0.502 g, FPGA = 1.000 Section 21.2.1.1 — Method 1 (from Chapter 21 – Site-Specific Ground Motion Procedures for Seismic Design) CRS = 1.040 CR1 = 1.074 8/10/2015 Design Maps Detailed Report http://ehp1­earthquake.cr.usgs.gov/designmaps/us/report.php?template=minimal&latitude=33.7989&longitude=­117.8902&siteclass=3&riskcategory=0&edition…6/6 Section 11.6 — Seismic Design Category Table 11.6-1 Seismic Design Category Based on Short Period Response Acceleration Parameter VALUE OF SDS RISK CATEGORY I  or II III IV SDS < 0.167g A A A 0.167g ≤ SDS < 0.33g B B C 0.33g ≤ SDS < 0.50g C C D 0.50g ≤ SDS D D D For Risk Category = I and SDS = 0.995 g, Seismic Design Category = D Table 11.6-2 Seismic Design Category Based on 1-S Period Response Acceleration Parameter VALUE OF SD1 RISK CATEGORY I  or II III IV SD1 < 0.067g A A A 0.067g ≤ SD1 < 0.133g B B C 0.133g ≤ SD1 < 0.20g C C D 0.20g ≤ SD1 D D D For Risk Category = I and SD1 = 0.543 g, Seismic Design Category = D Note: When S1 is greater than or equal to 0.75g, the Seismic Design Category is E for buildings in Risk Categories I, II, and III, and F for those in Risk Category IV, irrespective of the above. Seismic Design Category ≡ “the more severe design category in accordance with Table 11.6-1 or 11.6-2” = D Note: See Section 11.6 for alternative approaches to calculating Seismic Design Category. References 1. Figure 22-1: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22-1.pdf 2. Figure 22-2: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22-2.pdf 3. Figure 22-12: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22- 12.pdf 4. Figure 22-7: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22-7.pdf 5. Figure 22-17: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22- 17.pdf 6. Figure 22-18: http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/downloads/pdfs/2010_ASCE-7_Figure_22- 18.pdf Drainage Study OTH2015-00816 Jefferson Stadium Park Anaheim, California November 3, 2015 Revised: January 11 2016 Revised: March 15, 2016 Prepared for Prepared by JPI KHR Associates 12250 El Camino Real, Suite 380 20411 SW Birch Street, Suite 310 San Diego, California 92130 Newport Beach, California 92660 (858) 369-5682 (949) 756-6440 Contact: Rosie Cooper Contact: James H. Kawamura, P.E. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates Attestation This report has been prepared by, and under the direction of, the undersigned, a duly Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Except as noted, the undersigned attests to the technical information contained herein, and has judged to be acceptable the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data for this report, upon which findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based. ___________________________________ -i- James H. Kawamura, P.E.  Registered Civil Engineer No. C30560  Exp. 3/31/18  Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -ii- Table of Contents Section 1  Purpose and Scope ................................................................................................... 1  Section 2  Project Information .................................................................................................. 2  2.1 Project Description ........................................................................................................... 2  2.1.1 Project Location ........................................................................................................ 2  2.1.2 Project Activities Description ................................................................................... 3  2.2 Hydrologic Setting ........................................................................................................... 4  2.2.1 Watershed ................................................................................................................. 4  2.2.2  Existing Topography, Drainage Patterns, and Facilities (Narrative) ........................ 5  2.2.3 Adjacent Land Use .................................................................................................... 5  2.2.4 Soil Conditions.......................................................................................................... 5  2.2.5 Downstream Conditions............................................................................................ 5  2.2.6 Impervious Cover...................................................................................................... 6  2.3 Proposed Runoff Management Facilities ......................................................................... 6  Section 3  Design Criteria and Methodology ........................................................................... 7  3.1 Design Criteria ................................................................................................................. 7 3.1.1 Drainage Design Criteria .......................................................................................... 7  3.1.2 Rational Method: Peak Flow .................................................................................... 7  Section 4  Hydrology and Drainage Analysis .......................................................................... 8  4.1 Summary of Drainage Delineation ................................................................................... 8  4.2 Summary of Results ......................................................................................................... 9 4.3 Conclusion ...................................................................................................................... 10  Appendix Soils Map Existing Conditions Hydrology Map Proposed Conditions Hydrology Map CSP Retention Tank Sizing Calculations Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -1- Section 1 Purpose and Scope This Drainage Study presents an analysis of the hydrologic effects that may be associated with the development of the Jefferson Stadium Park (also known as The Experience at Gene Autry) mixed-use project. The study details the general project characteristics, the design, criteria and methodology applied to the analysis of the project. It evaluates the hydrologic effect of the project on local water resources in terms of both water quantity and water quality. The report provides a design analysis for the drainage facilities proposed as part of the project, including implementation and maintenance of water quality best management practices. On-site ponding analysis and review will be performed when a precise grading plan is submitted. This Hydrology Study fulfills the requirements of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP 2011) and the Orange County Hydrology Manual (October 1986), and describes the implementation and maintenance of water quality best management practices that will be installed on the site. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -2- Section 2 Project Information 2.1 Project Description The proposed Jefferson Stadium Park mixed-use project consists of constructing up to 1072 residential dwelling units and approximately 11,000 square feet of retail on a 17.57-acre site, located on the southwest corner of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way, within the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone of the City of Anaheim, California. The proposed project will be constructed in three phases, and include a 1.1-acre public park and public connector streets. 2.1.1 Project Location The proposed Jefferson Stadium Park mixed-use project is bounded by Gene Autry Way to the north, State College Boulevard to the east and Artisan Court to the south and an existing office/industrial buildings to the wests. Figure 1 provides an aerial perspective of the configuration and limits of the project site. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the project site within the Platinum Triangle boundary. The project site’s Orange County Assessor’s Parcel Number is 083-290-88. Figure 1 – Aerial Perspective of Project Site Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -3- Figure 2 – Project Site Location within the Platinum Triangle 2.1.2 Project Activities Description Phase I of the proposed development involves the construction of 5 story buildings with a parking structure. Phase II includes the construction of 5 story buildings wrapping around a parking structure. Phase III includes the construction of 4 story building over podium. Open space available for residential use consists of a fitness center, swimming pool and community room. The proposed project will also include new curb, gutter, storm drains, landscaping, sidewalk, and asphalt pavement. Figure 3 illustrates the location of each phase within the project site. A portion of Artisan Court highlighted in yellow in Figure 3 is a potential future development, and is not a part of this project. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -4- Figure 3 – Conceptual Site Plan 2.2 Hydrologic Setting This section summarizes the project's size and location in the context of the larger watershed perspective, topography, soil vegetation conditions, percent impervious area, natural and infrastructure drainage features, and other relevant hydrologic and environmental factors to be protected specific to the project area's watershed. 2.2.1 Watershed Approximately 11.6 AC of the project site is located within the Anaheim Bay-Huntington Harbor Watershed. The Anaheim Bay-Huntington Harbor Watershed is located in the northwest portion of Orange County. This watershed is 80.35 square miles including portions of the City of Anaheim, Cypress, Fountain Valley, Garden Grove, Huntington Beach, Los Alamitos, Santa Ana, Seal Beach, Stanton and Westminster. Its main tributaries are Bolsa Chica Channel, East- Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel and the Westminster Channel. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -5- The rest of the site, approximately 8.6 AC is located within the Santa Ana River Watershed. The Santa Ana River Watershed is the largest watershed in Orange County, covering 210.47 square miles. The watershed includes portions of the cities of Anaheim, Brea, Huntington Beach, Orange, Placentia, Santa Ana, Villa Park, and Yorba Linda. The river begins almost 75 miles away in the San Bernardino Mountains, it services as the main tributary to the watershed with Santiago Creek being the largest tributary within Orange County. 2.2.2 Existing Topography, Drainage Patterns, and Facilities (Narrative) The previous condition of the project site was commercial until 2012, when all of the buildings were demolished. Several of the former building foot prints have been stockpiled with gravel to approximately 3.5 feet in height. The current condition of the project is vacant. The existing site’s topography shows the westerly half of the site slopes towards the existing catch basin located within the northwest corner of the project site. The easterly half of the site slopes towards the existing parkway culvert on State College Boulevard. The elevation difference is approximately 8-feet. 2.2.3 Adjacent Land Use The existing sites adjacent to the project site are: office buildings to the north, Angel Stadium to the east, luxury apartment building to the south, and office buildings to the west. 2.2.4 Soil Conditions According to Geotechnical Exploration Report by Leighton and Associates, Inc. dated September 15, 2015, the site is underlain by undocumented artificial fill and Quaternary age young alluvial fan deposits. Groundwater was not encountered during the field exploration to the total depth drilled of 71.5 feet bgs. Based on the current proposed residential development scheme, groundwater is not expected to pose a constraint during construction. 2.2.5 Downstream Conditions According to Caltrans as-built plans, commencing near the westerly property line of the project site on the southerly side of Gene Autry Way and extending west, there is a 24-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) that transitions to a 7-foot by 2-foot reinforced concrete box (RCB), which transitions to double 4-foot by 3-foot RCBs. An existing catch basin located along the westerly property line within the northwest corner of the project site connects to the double 4-foot by 3- foot RCBs in the Caltrans right of way. There is an existing 48-inch RCP in State College Boulevard, commencing at Artisan Court and extending south. Within the public right of way near the southeast corner of the proposed site, is an existing Filterra stormwater treatment system with adjacent catch basin that connects to the 48-inch RCP in State College Boulevard via an 18-inch RCP. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -6- 2.2.6 Impervious Cover The project will not have a net increase in area of impervious cover compared to the previous conditions. The previous condition is industrial with surface parking with an average imperviousness of 95%. The proposed project site’s overall imperviousness to 95%. 2.3 Proposed Runoff Management Facilities The proposed facilities managing runoff from the site include:  Proposed onsite stormdrain system will drain the project site to Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard.  Proposed below grade CSP retention structures are used to treat runoff by means of infiltration. Infiltration is the preferred method for stormwater management where appropriate site conditions and soils exist. The use of infiltration methods helps to minimize the stormwater loading on existing storm drain systems and reduce the amount of runoff. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -7- Section 3 Design Criteria and Methodology This section summarizes the design criteria and methodology applied during the drainage analysis of the project site. The design criteria and methodology follow the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP 2003) and the Orange County Hydrology Manual (October 1986). This section briefly describes the implementation and maintenance of water quality best management practices (BMPs) that will be installed on the site. A more detailed description as well as sizing criterion for BMPs is addressed in this project’s Water Quality Management Plan (“WQMP”). 3.1 Design Criteria 3.1.1 Drainage Design Criteria Local storm drain facilities (street gutters, curb inlets) have been designed to conform to Orange County standards. 3.1.2 Rational Method: Peak Flow Runoff calculations for this study were accomplished using the Rational Method. The Rational Method is a physically-based numerical method where runoff is assumed to be directly proportional to rainfall and area, less losses for infiltration and depression storage. Flows were computed based on the rational formula: Q=CIA, where: Q = peak discharge (in cfs); C = runoff coefficient, based on land use and soil type; I = rainfall intensity (in inches/hour); A = watershed area (in acres). The watershed time of concentration at any given point is defined as the time it would theoretically take runoff to travel from the most upstream point in the watershed to a concentration point, as estimated by the Time of Concentration Nomograph for Initial Subarea (Figure D-4 within the Orange County Hydrology Manual and the appendix section of this report). Intensity for this site was determined by the intensity-duration curves from the Orange County Hydrology Manuals Figure’s B-3 and B-4. The runoff coefficient represents the ratio of rainfall that runs off the watershed versus the portion that infiltrates to the soil or is held in depression storage. The runoff coefficient (C) is dependent on rainfall intensity (I), soil infiltration rate (Fp), and impervious/pervious area fractions (ai and ap). Rational Method calculations were accomplished using hand calculations. Peak discharges were computed for 25-year hypothetical storm return frequencies and can be seen in the hydrology and drainage analysis section of this report. The output results of the calculations can be found in the Appendix section of this report. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -8- Section 4 Hydrology and Drainage Analysis This section summarizes the quantitative hydrologic analysis of the existing and proposed conditions of the site. 4.1 Summary of Drainage Delineation The existing site was broken into seven subareas for further drainage analysis. Subarea E1 drains toward an existing catch basin located within the northwest corner of the project site via surface runoff. Subarea E2 drains toward parkway culvert on State College Boulevard via surface runoff. Subarea E3 drain towards existing catch basin on Gene Autry Way. Subarea E4 and E5 drain toward existing catch basin on Artisan Court. Subarea E6 and E7 sheet flows to existing gutter in parking lot. There is no existing storm drain system within this project site. The appendix section of this report contains the Existing Condition Hydrology Map, which shows the existing drainage subareas and quantifies the peak flow for 10 and 25 year storm events. Under the proposed conditions, the project site was broken into 24 sub-areas that represent the boundaries of the contributing area. Area P1 A and SW Q drain toward Outlet 1. Area P1 B, PK A, US A, US B, AC A and AC B drain toward Outlet 2. Area P2 A and PS A drain toward Outlet 3. Area P3 A and PS B drain toward Outlet 4. Area P2 B, P3 B, P3 C, PS C, PS D, PK B, SW C and SW D drain toward Outlet 5. Area AC C and SC drain toward Outlet 6. Area GA drains toward Outlet 7. Area SW B drains toward Outlet 8. On-site drainage for the proposed site will be collected by roof drains and area drains, and directed to CSP retention tanks for infiltration. Larger storm events bypass the treatment system and discharge to the storm drain mains on Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard. A Proposed Conditions Hydrology Map located in the appendix section of this report identifies the subareas. Each subarea was quantified for peak flow 10 and 25 year storm event. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -9- 4.2 Summary of Results Below are tables that summarize the results of the peak runoff for both the existing and proposed conditions. Anaheim Bay – Huntington Harbour Watershed: Area (Acres) Proportion Impervious* Soil Type Rain Duration Flowrate (cfs) TC Value (min.) Existing Conditions 11.6 0.95** A 10 Years 30.72 15.6 25 Years 38.68 100 Years 46.96 Proposed Conditions 11.6 0.95* A 10 Years 30.38 17.1 25 Years 36.28 100 Years 46.41 Santa Ana River Watershed: Area (Acres) Proportion Impervious* Soil Type Rain Duration Flowrate (cfs) TC Value (min.) Existing Conditions 8.6 0.95** A 10 Years 23.64 14.7 25 Years 28.21 100 Years 36.11 Proposed Conditions 8.6 0.95* A 10 Years 23.08 16.0 25 Years 27.56 100 Years 35.27 * Portion Impervious for the proposed conditions varies for each small subarea thus average proportion impervious was used for calculations ** Project site’s existing condition is industrial/restaurants with surface parking Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -10- CSP Retention Tank Summary: CSP Retention Tank Mitigated Flowrate (cfs) Volume Stored (cf) Basin Outflow (cfs) P1 A 0.45 6,839 Q10 = 7.74 Q25 = 8.90 P1 B 0.40 6,149 Q10 = 6.21 Q25 = 7.41 P2 A 0.50 7,607 Q10 = 7.34 Q25 = 8.76 P2 B 0.34 5,275 Q10 = 5.47 Q25 = 6.51 P3 A 0.12 1,802 Q10 = 1.64 Q25 = 1.96 P3 B 0.70 10,814 Q10 = 10.59 Q25 = 12.64 See Appendix of this report for CSP Retention Tank calculations. Also, refer to Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) for detailed CSP Retention Tank analysis. 4.3 Conclusion The proposed project will experience an overall net reduction in peak discharge. One of the contributing factors is that although the site imperviousness stays the same, time of concentration becomes longer. See calculations in the Appendix section of this report. Jefferson Stadium Park Prepared by Anaheim, California KHR Associates -11- APPENDIX Q1 0 R a t i o n a l M e t h o d H y d r o l o g y C a l c u l a t i o n s f o r E x i s t i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s Pr o j e c t : J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Ar e a A A Σ A S o i l D e v K i T c I 10 F m F p F m a i a p Q 10 S 0 Ld n K pip e D/d D V T t Description No . (s q f t ) ( a c ) ( a c ) t y p e ty p e (m i n ) ( i n / h r ) ( i n / h r ) a v g a v g ( c f s ) (f t ) ( i n ) ( f t ) ( f p s ) ( m i n ) E1 4 3 3 8 2 7 . 3 9 . 9 6 9 . 9 6 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 8 . 2 3 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 7 . 1 6 0 . 0 7 3 1 0 8 4 S u r f a c e A r e a E2 3 0 0 2 7 9 . 5 5 6 . 8 9 6 . 8 9 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 7 . 4 3 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 9 2 9 2 3 S u r f a c e A r e a E3 5 4 5 0 5 . 9 3 1 . 2 5 1 . 2 5 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 1 5 . 6 2 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 3 6 0 . 0 0 3 1 0 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a E4 6 1 4 0 1 . 8 5 1 . 4 1 1 . 4 1 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 1 4 . 7 2 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 7 6 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 S u r f a c e A r e a E5 1 4 4 4 9 . 5 4 0 . 3 3 0 . 3 3 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 9 . 3 2 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 8 4 0 . 0 1 0 5 4 4 S u r f a c e A r e a E6 5 8 4 8 . 4 5 0 . 1 3 0 . 1 3 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 5 . 0 4 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 9 0 . 0 1 3 9 5 S u r f a c e A r e a E7 9 1 1 2 . 4 6 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 5 . 6 3 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 4 8 S u r f a c e A r e a R: \ J P I \ S t a d i u m P a r k \ D o c u m e n t s \ D r a i n a g e \ R a t i o n a l M e t h o d - E x i s t 2/25/2016 Q2 5 R a t i o n a l M e t h o d H y d r o l o g y C a l c u l a t i o n s f o r E x i s t i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s Pr o j e c t : J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Ar e a A A Σ A S o i l D e v K i T c I2 5 F m F p F m a i a p Q2 5 S 0 Ld n K pip e D/d D V T t Description No . (s q f t ) ( a c ) ( a c ) t y p e ty p e (m i n ) ( i n / h r ) ( i n / h r ) a v g a v g ( c f s ) (f t ) ( i n ) ( f t ) ( f p s ) ( m i n ) E1 4 3 3 8 2 7 . 3 9 . 9 6 9 . 9 6 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 8 . 2 3 . 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 3 2 . 4 2 0 . 0 7 3 1 0 8 4 S u r f a c e A r e a E2 3 0 0 2 7 9 . 5 5 6 . 8 9 6 . 8 9 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 7 . 4 3 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 3 . 9 0 0 . 0 9 2 9 2 3 S u r f a c e A r e a E3 5 4 5 0 5 . 9 3 1 . 2 5 1 . 2 5 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 1 5 . 6 2 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 8 3 0 . 0 0 3 1 0 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a E4 6 1 4 0 1 . 8 5 1 . 4 1 1 . 4 1 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 1 4 . 7 2 . 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 3 . 3 0 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 S u r f a c e A r e a E5 1 4 4 4 9 . 5 4 0 . 3 3 0 . 3 3 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 9 . 3 3 . 4 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 0 1 0 . 0 1 0 5 4 4 S u r f a c e A r e a E6 5 8 4 8 . 4 5 0 . 1 3 0 . 1 3 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 5 . 0 4 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 5 8 0 . 0 1 3 9 5 S u r f a c e A r e a E7 9 1 1 2 . 4 6 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 5 . 6 4 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 0 1 0 1 4 8 S u r f a c e A r e a R: \ J P I \ S t a d i u m P a r k \ D o c u m e n t s \ D r a i n a g e \ R a t i o n a l M e t h o d - E x i s t 2/25/2016 Q1 0 0 R a t i o n a l M e t h o d H y d r o l o g y C a l c u l a t i o n s f o r E x i s t i n g I m p r o v e m e n t s Pr o j e c t : J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Ar e a A A Σ A S o i l D e v K i T c I 10 0 F m F p F m a i a p Q 10 0 S 0 Ld n K pip e D/d D V T t Description No . (s q f t ) ( a c ) ( a c ) t y p e ty p e (m i n ) ( i n / h r ) ( i n / h r ) a v g a v g ( c f s ) (f t ) ( i n ) ( f t ) ( f p s ) ( m i n ) E1 4 3 3 8 2 7 . 3 9 . 9 6 9 . 9 6 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 8 . 2 4 . 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 4 1 . 4 9 0 . 0 7 3 1 0 8 4 S u r f a c e A r e a E2 3 0 0 2 7 9 . 5 5 6 . 8 9 6 . 8 9 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 7 . 4 5 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 3 0 . 6 1 0 . 0 9 2 9 2 3 S u r f a c e A r e a E3 5 4 5 0 5 . 9 3 1 . 2 5 1 . 2 5 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 1 5 . 6 3 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 3 . 6 0 0 . 0 0 3 1 0 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a E4 6 1 4 0 1 . 8 5 1 . 4 1 1 . 4 1 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 1 4 . 7 3 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 4 . 2 1 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 S u r f a c e A r e a E5 1 4 4 4 9 . 5 4 0 . 3 3 0 . 3 3 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 9 . 3 4 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 2 9 0 . 0 1 0 5 4 4 S u r f a c e A r e a E6 5 8 4 8 . 4 5 0 . 1 3 0 . 1 3 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 5 . 0 6 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 5 0 . 0 1 3 9 5 S u r f a c e A r e a E7 9 1 1 2 . 4 6 0 . 2 1 0 . 2 1 A C o m m e r c i a l 0 . 2 9 8 5 . 6 5 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 0 9 0 . 0 1 0 1 4 8 S u r f a c e A r e a R: \ J P I \ S t a d i u m P a r k \ D o c u m e n t s \ D r a i n a g e \ R a t i o n a l M e t h o d - E x i s t 2/25/2016 Q1 0 R a t i o n a l M e t h o d H y d r o l o g y C a l c u l a t i o n s f o r P r o p o s e d I m p r o v e m e n t s Pr o j e c t : J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Ar e a A A Σ A S o i l D e v K i T c I 10 F m F p F m a i a p Q 10 S 0 Ld n K pip e D/ d D V T t Description No . (s q f t ) ( a c ) ( a c ) t y p e ty p e (m i n ) ( i n / h r ) ( i n / h r ) a v g a v g ( c f s ) (f t ) ( i n ) ( f t ) ( f p s ) ( m i n ) P1 A 1 1 2 3 8 4 . 8 2 . 5 8 2 . 5 8 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 4 3 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 7 . 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 0 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 5 8 7. 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 5 6 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 4 9 % 0 . 7 4 8 . 6 1 . 1 P1 B 1 0 1 0 5 9 . 2 2 . 3 2 2 . 3 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 8 . 5 3 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 6 . 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 3 5 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 3 2 6. 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 5 7 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 4 2 % 0 . 6 3 8 . 2 1 . 2 P2 A 1 2 0 2 2 5 . 6 2 . 7 6 2 . 7 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 8 . 6 3 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 7 . 3 4 0 . 0 1 0 3 6 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 4. 9 0 7. 3 4 0 . 0 1 0 4 9 2 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 4 8 % 0 . 7 2 8 . 5 1 . 0 P2 B 7 3 6 1 6 . 4 1 . 6 9 1 . 6 9 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 1 3 . 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 5 . 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 1 5 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 6 9 5. 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 3 6 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 3 8 % 0 . 5 7 7 . 9 0 . 8 P3 A 2 4 8 2 9 . 2 0 . 5 7 0 . 5 7 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 5 3 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 6 4 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 5 7 1. 6 4 0 . 0 1 0 2 9 9 1 2 0 . 0 0 9 5 1 . 5 3 5 % 0 . 3 5 5 . 8 0 . 9 P3 B 7 4 8 6 4 . 3 3 1 . 7 2 1 . 7 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 9 . 9 2 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 4 . 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 5 1 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 7 2 4. 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 8 2 3 2 1 0 . 0 0 9 2 2 8 . 9 2 3 % 0 . 4 0 7 . 1 1 . 9 P3 C 8 9 8 8 5 . 5 9 2 . 0 6 2 . 0 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 6 3 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 6 . 3 8 0 . 0 1 0 1 8 7 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 0 6 6. 3 8 0 . 0 1 0 3 8 8 2 1 0 . 0 0 9 2 2 8 . 9 3 2 % 0 . 5 6 8 . 1 0 . 8 PK A 2 8 3 7 5 . 4 4 0 . 6 5 0 . 6 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 5 3 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 8 8 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 3 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 6 5 1. 8 8 0 . 0 1 0 3 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 8 % 0 . 2 7 5 . 7 0 . 1 PK B 1 9 8 9 8 . 0 6 0 . 4 6 0 . 4 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 5 3 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 4 3 0 . 0 1 0 1 7 7 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 4 6 1. 4 3 0 . 0 1 0 3 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 5 % 0 . 2 3 5 . 1 0 . 1 US A 1 6 5 5 2 . 8 0 . 3 8 0 . 3 8 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 3 . 7 2 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 7 0 . 0 0 3 5 7 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 8 0. 7 7 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 9 % 0 . 1 4 4 . 3 0 . 1 US B 1 5 2 4 6 0 . 3 5 0 . 3 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 3 . 6 2 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 1 0 . 0 0 3 5 7 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 5 0. 7 1 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 9 % 0 . 1 4 3 . 9 0 . 1 PS A 4 7 9 1 . 6 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 1 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 8 3 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 1 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 3 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 1 0. 3 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 8 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 4 0 % 0 . 2 0 3 . 8 0 . 1 PS B 4 7 9 1 . 6 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 1 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 8 3 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 1 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 1 0. 3 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 4 0 % 0 . 2 0 3 . 8 0 . 1 PS C 1 3 0 6 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 3 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 2 . 2 2 . 4 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 3 4 2 8 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 0 0. 6 5 0 . 0 1 0 1 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 7 5 % 0 . 3 8 4 . 6 0 . 4 PS D 1 3 0 6 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 3 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 2 . 1 2 . 4 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 6 5 0 . 0 0 3 4 2 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 0 0. 6 5 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 7 5 % 0 . 3 8 4 . 6 0 . 1 GA 4 8 9 1 2 . 8 6 1 . 1 2 1 . 1 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 7 . 1 2 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 0 1 0 . 0 0 3 1 0 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 1 2 2. 0 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 1 0 . 2 0 . 0 SC 5 8 8 9 9 . 5 9 1 . 3 5 1 . 3 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 6 . 0 2 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 5 1 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 3 5 2. 5 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 1 2 . 8 0 . 0 AC A 6 8 4 6 . 7 1 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 1 3 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 2 2 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 6 0. 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 3 9 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 6 % 0 . 0 9 3 . 6 0 . 2 AC B 9 5 4 1 . 0 2 0 . 2 2 0 . 2 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 2 3 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 6 5 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 2 2 0. 6 5 0 . 0 1 0 5 5 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 8 % 0 . 1 2 3 . 9 0 . 2 AC C 1 7 6 3 1 . 3 1 0 . 4 0 0 . 4 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 1 2 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 9 8 0 . 0 1 0 5 4 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 4 0 0. 9 8 0 . 0 1 0 3 5 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 1 % 0 . 1 7 4 . 6 0 . 1 SW A 5 7 5 6 . 9 8 0 . 1 3 0 . 1 3 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 9 2 . 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 1 0 . 0 0 3 3 4 2 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 3 0. 3 1 0 . 0 1 0 4 2 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 2 3 % 0 . 1 5 3 . 7 0 . 2 SW B 6 0 4 8 . 7 2 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 1 . 5 2 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 1 0 . 0 0 3 3 9 8 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 4 0. 3 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 2 3 % 0 . 1 5 3 . 7 0 . 1 SW C 6 0 4 8 . 7 2 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 0 2 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 4 0 . 0 0 4 3 2 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 4 0. 3 4 0 . 0 1 0 7 9 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 2 4 % 0 . 1 6 3 . 8 0 . 3 SW D 8 0 7 1 . 7 1 0 . 1 9 0 . 1 9 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 0 2 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 5 0 . 0 0 4 3 2 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 9 0. 4 5 0 . 0 1 0 8 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 3 0 % 0 . 2 0 4 . 2 0 . 0 R: \ J P I \ S t a d i u m P a r k \ D o c u m e n t s \ D r a i n a g e \ R a t i o n a l M e t h o d - P r o p 2/25/2016 Q2 5 R a t i o n a l M e t h o d H y d r o l o g y C a l c u l a t i o n s f o r P r o p o s e d I m p r o v e m e n t s Pr o j e c t : J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Ar e a A A Σ A S o i l D e v K i T c I 25 F m F p F m a i a p Q 25 S 0 Ld n K pip e D/ d D V T t Description No . (s q f t ) ( a c ) ( a c ) t y p e ty p e (m i n ) ( i n / h r ) ( i n / h r ) a v g a v g ( c f s ) (f t ) ( i n ) ( f t ) ( f p s ) ( m i n ) P1 A 1 1 2 3 8 4 . 8 2 . 5 8 2 . 5 8 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 4 3 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 8 . 9 0 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 0 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 5 8 8. 9 0 0 . 0 1 0 5 6 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 5 6 % 0 . 8 4 8 . 9 1 . 1 P1 B 1 0 1 0 5 9 . 2 2 . 3 2 2 . 3 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 8 . 5 3 . 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 7 . 4 1 0 . 0 1 0 3 5 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 3 2 7. 4 1 0 . 0 1 0 5 7 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 4 9 % 0 . 7 4 8 . 5 1 . 1 P2 A 1 2 0 2 2 5 . 6 2 . 7 6 2 . 7 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 8 . 6 3 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 8 . 7 6 0 . 0 1 0 3 6 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 4. 9 0 8. 7 6 0 . 0 1 0 4 9 2 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 5 6 % 0 . 8 4 8 . 8 0 . 9 P2 B 7 3 6 1 6 . 4 1 . 6 9 1 . 6 9 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 1 4 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 6 . 5 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 5 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 6 9 6. 5 1 0 . 0 1 0 3 6 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 4 4 % 0 . 6 6 8 . 2 0 . 7 P3 A 2 4 8 2 9 . 2 0 . 5 7 0 . 5 7 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 5 3 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 9 6 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 5 7 1. 9 6 0 . 0 1 0 2 9 9 1 2 0 . 0 0 9 5 1 . 5 4 0 % 0 . 4 0 6 . 1 0 . 8 P3 B 7 4 8 6 4 . 3 3 1 . 7 2 1 . 7 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 9 . 9 3 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 5 . 0 3 0 . 0 1 0 5 1 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 7 2 5. 0 3 0 . 0 1 0 8 2 3 2 1 0 . 0 0 9 2 2 8 . 9 2 7 % 0 . 4 7 7 . 4 1 . 8 P3 C 8 9 8 8 5 . 5 9 2 . 0 6 2 . 0 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 6 4 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 7 . 6 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 8 7 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 0 6 7. 6 1 0 . 0 1 0 3 8 8 2 1 0 . 0 0 9 2 2 8 . 9 3 6 % 0 . 6 3 8 . 6 0 . 8 PK A 2 8 3 7 5 . 4 4 0 . 6 5 0 . 6 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 5 3 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 2 4 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 3 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 6 5 2. 2 4 0 . 0 1 0 3 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 2 0 % 0 . 3 0 5 . 9 0 . 1 PK B 1 9 8 9 8 . 0 6 0 . 4 6 0 . 4 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 5 4 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 7 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 7 7 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 4 6 1. 7 1 0 . 0 1 0 3 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 6 % 0 . 2 4 5 . 5 0 . 1 US A 1 6 5 5 2 . 8 0 . 3 8 0 . 3 8 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 3 . 7 2 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 9 3 0 . 0 0 3 5 7 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 8 0. 9 3 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 1 % 0 . 1 7 4 . 6 0 . 1 US B 1 5 2 4 6 0 . 3 5 0 . 3 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 3 . 6 2 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 8 5 0 . 0 0 3 5 7 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 5 0. 8 5 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 0 % 0 . 1 5 4 . 3 0 . 1 PS A 4 7 9 1 . 6 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 1 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 8 3 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 3 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 1 0. 3 7 0 . 0 1 0 1 8 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 4 6 % 0 . 2 3 4 . 0 0 . 1 PS B 4 7 9 1 . 6 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 1 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 8 3 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 1 0. 3 7 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 4 6 % 0 . 2 3 4 . 0 0 . 1 PS C 1 3 0 6 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 3 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 2 . 2 2 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 8 0 . 0 0 3 4 2 8 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 0 0. 7 8 0 . 0 1 0 1 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 9 2 % 0 . 4 6 4 . 7 0 . 4 PS D 1 3 0 6 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 3 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 2 . 1 2 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 8 0 . 0 0 3 4 2 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 0 0. 7 8 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 9 2 % 0 . 4 6 4 . 7 0 . 1 GA 4 8 9 1 2 . 8 6 1 . 1 2 1 . 1 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 7 . 1 2 . 4 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 4 1 0 . 0 0 3 1 0 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 1 2 2. 4 1 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 1 2 . 3 0 . 0 SC 5 8 8 9 9 . 5 9 1 . 3 5 1 . 3 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 6 . 0 2 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 3 . 0 2 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 3 5 3. 0 2 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 1 5 . 4 0 . 0 AC A 6 8 4 6 . 7 1 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 1 3 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 5 6 0 . 0 1 0 2 2 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 6 0. 5 6 0 . 0 1 0 3 9 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 7 % 0 . 1 1 3 . 6 0 . 2 AC B 9 5 4 1 . 0 2 0 . 2 2 0 . 2 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 2 3 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 7 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 2 2 0. 7 7 0 . 0 1 0 5 5 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 9 % 0 . 1 4 4 . 3 0 . 2 AC C 1 7 6 3 1 . 3 1 0 . 4 0 0 . 4 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 1 3 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 1 7 0 . 0 1 0 5 4 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 4 0 1. 1 7 0 . 0 1 0 3 5 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 3 % 0 . 2 0 4 . 7 0 . 1 SW A 5 7 5 6 . 9 8 0 . 1 3 0 . 1 3 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 9 3 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 3 3 4 2 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 3 0. 3 7 0 . 0 1 0 4 2 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 2 6 % 0 . 1 7 3 . 9 0 . 2 SW B 6 0 4 8 . 7 2 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 1 . 5 3 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 3 3 9 8 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 4 0. 3 7 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 2 6 % 0 . 1 7 3 . 9 0 . 1 SW C 6 0 4 8 . 7 2 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 0 3 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 1 0 . 0 0 4 3 2 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 4 0. 4 1 0 . 0 1 0 7 9 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 2 8 % 0 . 1 9 4 . 1 0 . 3 SW D 8 0 7 1 . 7 1 0 . 1 9 0 . 1 9 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 0 3 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 5 4 0 . 0 0 4 3 2 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 9 0. 5 4 0 . 0 1 0 8 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 3 4 % 0 . 2 3 4 . 4 0 . 0 R: \ J P I \ S t a d i u m P a r k \ D o c u m e n t s \ D r a i n a g e \ R a t i o n a l M e t h o d - P r o p 2/25/2016 Q1 0 0 R a t i o n a l M e t h o d H y d r o l o g y C a l c u l a t i o n s f o r P r o p o s e d I m p r o v e m e n t s Pr o j e c t : J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k Ar e a A A Σ A S o i l D e v K i T c I1 0 0 F m F p F m a i a p Q1 0 0 S 0 Ld n K pip e D/ d D V T t Description No . (s q f t ) ( a c ) ( a c ) t y p e ty p e (m i n ) ( i n / h r ) ( i n / h r ) a v g a v g ( c f s ) (f t ) ( i n ) ( f t ) ( f p s ) ( m i n ) P1 A 1 1 2 3 8 4 . 8 2 . 5 8 2 . 5 8 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 4 4 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 1 . 4 0 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 0 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 5 8 11 . 4 0 0 . 0 1 0 5 6 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 7 0 % 1 . 0 5 9 . 4 1 . 0 P1 B 1 0 1 0 5 9 . 2 2 . 3 2 2 . 3 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 8 . 5 4 . 6 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 9 . 4 9 0 . 0 1 0 3 5 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 3 2 9. 4 9 0 . 0 1 0 5 7 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 5 9 % 0 . 8 9 9 . 0 1 . 1 P2 A 1 2 0 2 2 5 . 6 2 . 7 6 2 . 7 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 8 . 6 4 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 1 . 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 3 6 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 4. 9 0 11 . 2 1 0 . 0 1 0 4 9 2 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 6 9 % 1 . 0 4 9 . 4 0 . 9 P2 B 7 3 6 1 6 . 4 1 . 6 9 1 . 6 9 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 1 5 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 8 . 3 5 0 . 0 1 0 1 5 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 6 9 8. 3 5 0 . 0 1 0 3 6 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 5 3 % 0 . 8 0 8 . 8 0 . 7 P3 A 2 4 8 2 9 . 2 0 . 5 7 0 . 5 7 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 5 4 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 5 1 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 5 7 2. 5 1 0 . 0 1 0 2 9 9 1 2 0 . 0 0 9 5 1 . 5 4 8 % 0 . 4 8 6 . 5 0 . 8 P3 B 7 4 8 6 4 . 3 3 1 . 7 2 1 . 7 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 9 . 9 4 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 6 . 4 3 0 . 0 1 0 5 1 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 7 2 6. 4 3 0 . 0 1 0 8 2 3 2 1 0 . 0 0 9 2 2 8 . 9 3 2 % 0 . 5 6 8 . 2 1 . 7 P3 C 8 9 8 8 5 . 5 9 2 . 0 6 2 . 0 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 6 5 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 9 . 7 5 0 . 0 1 0 1 8 7 S u r f a c e A r e a 2. 0 6 9. 7 5 0 . 0 1 0 3 8 8 2 1 0 . 0 0 9 2 2 8 . 9 4 4 % 0 . 7 7 9 . 1 0 . 7 PK A 2 8 3 7 5 . 4 4 0 . 6 5 0 . 6 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 5 4 . 9 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 8 7 0 . 0 1 0 2 5 3 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 6 5 2. 8 7 0 . 0 1 0 3 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 2 4 % 0 . 3 6 6 . 4 0 . 1 PK B 1 9 8 9 8 . 0 6 0 . 4 6 0 . 4 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 6 . 5 5 . 3 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 2 . 1 9 0 . 0 1 0 1 7 7 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 4 6 2. 1 9 0 . 0 1 0 3 4 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 2 0 % 0 . 3 0 5 . 9 0 . 1 US A 1 6 5 5 2 . 8 0 . 3 8 0 . 3 8 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 3 . 7 3 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 1 8 0 . 0 0 3 5 7 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 8 1. 1 8 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 3 % 0 . 2 0 4 . 7 0 . 1 US B 1 5 2 4 6 0 . 3 5 0 . 3 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 3 . 6 3 . 5 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 0 9 0 . 0 0 3 5 7 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 5 1. 0 9 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 2 % 0 . 1 8 4 . 7 0 . 1 PS A 4 7 9 1 . 6 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 1 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 8 4 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 3 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 1 0. 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 1 8 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 5 6 % 0 . 2 8 4 . 3 0 . 1 PS B 4 7 9 1 . 6 0 . 1 1 0 . 1 1 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 8 4 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 3 1 4 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 1 0. 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 5 6 % 0 . 2 8 4 . 3 0 . 1 PS C 1 3 0 6 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 3 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 2 . 2 3 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 4 2 8 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 0 1. 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 1 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 5 . 1 0 . 4 PS D 1 3 0 6 8 0 . 3 0 0 . 3 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 2 . 1 3 . 7 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 3 4 2 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 3 0 1. 0 0 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 5 . 1 0 . 1 GA 4 8 9 1 2 . 8 6 1 . 1 2 1 . 1 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 7 . 1 3 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 3 . 0 8 0 . 0 0 3 1 0 5 6 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 1 2 3. 0 8 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 1 5 . 7 0 . 0 SC 5 8 8 9 9 . 5 9 1 . 3 5 1 . 3 5 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 6 . 0 3 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 3 . 8 4 0 . 0 0 4 1 0 4 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 1. 3 5 3. 8 4 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 6 0 . 0 0 9 8 . 1 1 0 0 % 0 . 5 0 1 9 . 6 0 . 0 AC A 6 8 4 6 . 7 1 0 . 1 6 0 . 1 6 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 1 5 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 7 1 0 . 0 1 0 2 2 5 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 6 0. 7 1 0 . 0 1 0 3 9 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 9 % 0 . 1 4 3 . 9 0 . 2 AC B 9 5 4 1 . 0 2 0 . 2 2 0 . 2 2 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 7 . 2 5 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 9 9 0 . 0 1 0 2 3 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 2 2 0. 9 9 0 . 0 1 0 5 5 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 1 % 0 . 1 7 4 . 6 0 . 2 AC C 1 7 6 3 1 . 3 1 0 . 4 0 0 . 4 0 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 1 4 . 1 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 1 . 5 0 0 . 0 1 0 5 4 4 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 4 0 1. 5 0 0 . 0 1 0 3 5 1 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 5 1 . 7 1 5 % 0 . 2 3 5 . 1 0 . 1 SW A 5 7 5 6 . 9 8 0 . 1 3 0 . 1 3 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 9 4 . 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 7 0 . 0 0 3 3 4 2 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 3 0. 4 7 0 . 0 1 0 4 2 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 3 1 % 0 . 2 1 4 . 2 0 . 2 SW B 6 0 4 8 . 7 2 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 1 . 5 3 . 8 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 4 8 0 . 0 0 3 3 9 8 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 4 0. 4 8 0 . 0 1 0 1 9 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 3 1 % 0 . 2 1 4 . 3 0 . 1 SW C 6 0 4 8 . 7 2 0 . 1 4 0 . 1 4 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 0 4 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 5 2 0 . 0 0 4 3 2 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 4 0. 5 2 0 . 0 1 0 7 9 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 3 3 % 0 . 2 2 4 . 3 0 . 3 SW D 8 0 7 1 . 7 1 0 . 1 9 0 . 1 9 A A p a r t m e n t s 0 . 3 2 5 1 0 . 0 4 . 2 0 . 0 2 0 . 4 0 0 . 0 2 0 . 9 5 0 . 0 5 0 . 6 9 0 . 0 0 4 3 2 1 S u r f a c e A r e a 0. 1 9 0. 6 9 0 . 0 1 0 8 8 0 . 0 0 9 1 7 . 5 4 1 % 0 . 2 7 4 . 7 0 . 0 R: \ J P I \ S t a d i u m P a r k \ D o c u m e n t s \ D r a i n a g e \ R a t i o n a l M e t h o d - P r o p 2/25/2016 Stadium Park - Parcel 1 - Area A Tributary Area: 2.58 acres Impervious Area: 2.45 acres Pervious Area: 0.13 acres Rainfall Depth: 0.85 inches DCV Equation: Vb = C * d * At * (1 ft/12 in) * (43,560 ft2/acre) Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) d = rainfall depth At = total area of site in acres C = 0.75 x 0.95 + 0.15 = 0.86 Vb =0.86 x 0.85 x 2.58 x 0.083 x 43,560 = 6,839 cf SQDF Equation: QP, SQDF = C * I * A Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) i = rainfall intensity (0.2 in/hr) A = total area of site in acres QP, SQDF =0.863 x 0.2 x 2.58 = 0.45 cfs Pipe Size Required Diameter Radius Length Surface Area 4 ft. 2 ft. 544.2 ft. 6 ft. 3 ft. 241.9 ft. 8 ft. 4 ft. 136.0 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 87.1 ft. Approximate Square Footage for StormTrap Required SingleTrap 1327 sq. ft. DoubleTrap 663.9 sq.ft. Stadium Park - Parcel 1 - Area B Tributary Area: 2.32 acres Impervious Area: 2.20 acres Pervious Area: 0.12 acres Rainfall Depth: 0.85 inches DCV Equation: Vb = C * d * At * (1 ft/12 in) * (43,560 ft2/acre) Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) d = rainfall depth At = total area of site in acres C = 0.75 x 0.95 + 0.15 = 0.86 Vb =0.86 x 0.85 x 2.32 x 0.083 x 43,560 = 6,149 cf SQDF Equation: QP, SQDF = C * I * A Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) i = rainfall intensity (0.2 in/hr) A = total area of site in acres QP, SQDF =0.863 x 0.2 x 2.32 = 0.40 cfs Pipe Size Required Diameter Radius Length 4 ft. 2 ft. 489.4 ft. 6 ft. 3 ft. 217.5 ft. 8 ft. 4 ft. 122.3 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 78.3 ft. Approximate Square Footage for StormTrap Required SingleTrap 1193 sq. ft. DoubleTrap 597 sq.ft. Stadium Park - Parcel 2 - Area A Tributary Area: 2.87 acres Impervious Area: 2.73 acres Pervious Area: 0.14 acres Rainfall Depth: 0.85 inches DCV Equation: Vb = C * d * At * (1 ft/12 in) * (43,560 ft2/acre) Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) d = rainfall depth At = total area of site in acres C = 0.75 x 0.95 + 0.15 = 0.86 Vb =0.86 x 0.85 x 2.87 x 0.083 x 43,560 = 7,607 cf SQDF Equation: QP, SQDF = C * I * A Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) i = rainfall intensity (0.2 in/hr) A = total area of site in acres QP, SQDF =0.863 x 0.2 x 2.87 = 0.50 cfs Pipe Size Required Diameter Radius Length 4 ft. 2 ft. 605.4 ft. 6 ft. 3 ft. 269.1 ft. 8 ft. 4 ft. 151.3 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 96.9 ft. Approximate Square Footage for StormTrap Required SingleTrap 1476 sq. ft. DoubleTrap 738.6 sq.ft. Stadium Park - Parcel 2 - Area B Tributary Area: 1.99 acres Impervious Area: 1.89 acres Pervious Area: 0.10 acres Rainfall Depth: 0.85 inches DCV Equation: Vb = C * d * At * (1 ft/12 in) * (43,560 ft2/acre) Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) d = rainfall depth At = total area of site in acres C = 0.75 x 0.95 + 0.15 = 0.86 Vb =0.86 x 0.85 x 1.99 x 0.083 x 43,560 = 5,275 cf SQDF Equation: QP, SQDF = C * I * A Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) i = rainfall intensity (0.2 in/hr) A = total area of site in acres QP, SQDF =0.863 x 0.2 x 1.99 = 0.34 cfs Pipe Size Required Diameter Radius Length 4 ft. 2 ft. 419.7 ft. 6 ft. 3 ft. 186.6 ft. 8 ft. 4 ft. 104.9 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 67.2 ft. Approximate Square Footage for StormTrap Required SingleTrap 1023 sq. ft. DoubleTrap 512.1 sq.ft. Stadium Park - Parcel 3 - Area A Tributary Area: 0.68 acres Impervious Area: 0.65 acres Pervious Area: 0.03 acres Rainfall Depth: 0.85 inches DCV Equation: Vb = C * d * At * (1 ft/12 in) * (43,560 ft2/acre) Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) d = rainfall depth At = total area of site in acres C = 0.75 x 0.95 + 0.15 = 0.86 Vb =0.86 x 0.85 x 0.68 x 0.083 x 43,560 = 1,802 cf SQDF Equation: QP, SQDF = C * I * A Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) i = rainfall intensity (0.2 in/hr) A = total area of site in acres QP, SQDF =0.863 x 0.2 x 0.68 = 0.12 cfs Pipe Size Required Diameter Radius Length 4 ft. 2 ft. 143.4 ft. 6 ft. 3 ft. 63.7 ft. 8 ft. 4 ft. 35.9 ft. Approximate Square Footage for StormTrap Required SingleTrap 349.7 sq. ft. DoubleTrap 175 sq.ft. Stadium Park - Parcel 3 - Area B Tributary Area: 4.08 acres Impervious Area: 3.88 acres Pervious Area: 0.20 acres Rainfall Depth: 0.85 inches DCV Equation: Vb = C * d * At * (1 ft/12 in) * (43,560 ft2/acre) Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) d = rainfall depth At = total area of site in acres C = 0.75 x 0.95 + 0.15 = 0.86 Vb =0.86 x 0.85 x 4.08 x 0.083 x 43,560 = 10,814 cf SQDF Equation: QP, SQDF = C * I * A Where: C = runoff coefficient (0.75 x imp + 0.15) i = rainfall intensity (0.2 in/hr) A = total area of site in acres QP, SQDF =0.863 x 0.2 x 4.08 = 0.70 cfs Pipe Size Required Diameter Radius Length 4 ft. 2 ft. 860.6 ft. 6 ft. 3 ft. 382.5 ft. 8 ft. 4 ft. 215.1 ft. 10 ft. 5 ft. 137.7 ft. Approximate Square Footage for StormTrap Required SingleTrap 2098 sq. ft. DoubleTrap 1050 sq.ft. APPENDIX H Noise Modeling Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Excavation ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Dozer No 40 81.7 60 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 60 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 100 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 120 0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 60 0 Tractor No 40 84 120 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Dozer 80.1 76.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 80.1 76.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 75.6 71.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 71.5 67.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 76 72 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 76.4 72.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 80.1 81.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Dozer No 40 81.7 200 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 200 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 300 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 300 0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 200 0 Tractor No 40 84 300 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Dozer 69.6 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.6 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 66.1 62.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 63.5 59.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 65.5 61.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.4 64.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69.6 71.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Demolition ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 60 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 60 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 100 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 120 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 60 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 120 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Saw 88 81 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 79.1 75.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 74.7 70.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 73.1 69.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 80.1 76.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 74.1 70.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 88 83.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 200 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 200 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 300 0 Excavator No 40 80.7 300 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 200 0 Dozer No 40 81.7 300 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Saw 77.5 70.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 68.7 64.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 65.1 61.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Excavator 65.1 61.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 69.6 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 66.1 62.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 77.5 73.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Arch Coatings Bldg 3 ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 60 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 76.1 72.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 76.1 72.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 200 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 65.6 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.6 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Arch Coatings Bldg 1_2 ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 60 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 76.1 72.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 76.1 72.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 200 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 65.6 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 65.6 61.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Paving ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Paver No 50 77.2 60 0 Paver No 50 77.2 120 0 Pneumatic Tools No 50 85.2 60 0 Pneumatic Tools No 50 85.2 120 0 Roller No 20 80 60 0 Roller No 20 80 120 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Paver 75.6 72.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 69.6 66.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pneumatic Tools 83.6 80.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pneumatic Tools 77.6 74.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 78.4 71.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 72.4 65.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 83.6 82.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Paver No 50 77.2 200 0 Paver No 50 77.2 300 0 Pneumatic Tools No 50 85.2 200 0 Pneumatic Tools No 50 85.2 300 0 Roller No 20 80 200 0 Roller No 20 80 300 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Paver 65.2 62.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 61.7 58.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pneumatic Tools 73.1 70.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Pneumatic Tools 69.6 66.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 68 61 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 64.4 57.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 73.1 72.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Building Const 3 ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Crane No 16 80.6 60 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 120 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 60 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 120 0 Generator No 50 80.6 60 0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 60 0 Tractor No 40 84 120 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 120 0 Welder / Torch No 40 74 60 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 79 71 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 67.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 73.1 66.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 67.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 79 76 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 76 72 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 76.4 72.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 71.5 67.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 79 80.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Crane No 16 80.6 200 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 300 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 200 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 300 0 Generator No 50 80.6 200 0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 300 0 Tractor No 40 84 200 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 200 0 Welder / Torch No 40 74 200 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 68.5 60.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 59.1 52.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 62.7 55.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 59.1 52.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 68.6 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 62 58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 72 68 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 62 58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72 71.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Building Const 1 and 2 ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Crane No 16 80.6 60 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 120 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 60 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 120 0 Generator No 50 80.6 60 0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 60 0 Tractor No 40 84 120 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 120 0 Welder / Torch No 40 74 60 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 79 71 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 67.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 73.1 66.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 67.1 60.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 79 76 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 76 72 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 76.4 72.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 71.5 67.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 72.4 68.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 79 80.2 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Crane No 16 80.6 200 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 300 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 200 0 Man Lift No 20 74.7 300 0 Generator No 50 80.6 200 0 Backhoe No 40 77.6 300 0 Tractor No 40 84 200 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 200 0 Welder / Torch No 40 74 200 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 68.5 60.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 59.1 52.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 62.7 55.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Man Lift 59.1 52.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Generator 68.6 65.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Backhoe 62 58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 72 68 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Welder / Torch 62 58 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 72 71.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report dat 3/3/2016 Case DescrJefferson Stadium Park Project ‐ Trenching ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #1 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Nearest ReResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Slurry Trenching MachNo 50 80.4 60 0 Slurry Trenching MachNo 50 80.4 120 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 60 0 Tractor No 40 84 120 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Slurry Trenching Mach 78.8 75.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Slurry Trenching Mach 72.8 69.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 77.5 73.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 76.4 72.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 78.8 79.4 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. ‐‐‐‐ Receptor #2 ‐‐‐‐ Baselines (dBA) DescriptionLand Use Daytime Evening Night Typical ConResidentia 65 60 55 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Slurry Trenching MachNo 50 80.4 200 0 Slurry Trenching MachNo 50 80.4 300 0 Front End Loader No 40 79.1 200 0 Tractor No 40 84 300 0 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Night Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Slurry Trenching Mach 68.3 65.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Slurry Trenching Mach 64.8 61.8 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Front End Loader 67.1 63.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 68.4 64.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 68.4 69.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h t h e a p p r o v a l o f F H W A Ro a d w a y Po i n t s Na m e Wi d t h Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( p a v e m e n t ) Fl o w C o n t r o l Segment X Y Z Co n t r o l Sp e e d Percent Pvmt On De v i c e Co n s t r a i n t Vehicles Type Struct?Affected ft f t f t f t m p h % K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d 1 1 4 . 8 p o i n t 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 4 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 G e n e A u t r e y W a y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 5 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 6 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 7 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 O r a n g e w o o d A v e 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 0 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 I - 5 2 9 8 . 6 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 6 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 9 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 0 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 6 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 1 10 M a IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g Ro a d w a y P o i n t s Na m e Na m e No . Se g m e n t Au t o s MT r u c k s HT r u c k s Bu s e s Motorcycles VS V S V S V S V S ve h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d p o i n t 1 1 3 0 2 3 4 0 6 2 4 0 3 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 G e n e A u t r e y W a y p o i n t 3 3 4 0 8 3 5 8 3 5 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 4 0 8 3 5 8 3 5 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 4 0 8 3 5 8 3 5 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 4 0 8 3 5 8 3 5 4 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 O r a n g e w o o d A v e p o i n t 5 5 2 2 5 3 4 0 4 6 4 0 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d p o i n t 7 7 2 6 2 5 4 0 5 4 4 0 2 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y p o i n t 9 9 2 6 2 5 4 0 5 4 4 0 2 7 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 I - 5 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 1 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Co o r d i n a t e s ( g r o u n d ) He i g h t In p u t S o u n d L e v e l s a n d C r i t e r i a A c t i v e X Y Z ab o v e Ex i s t i n g Im p a c t C r i t e r i a N R in Gr o u n d LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h Sub'l Goal Calc. ft f t f t f t d B A d B A d B d B E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 1 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g Ba r r i e r Po i n t s Na m e Ty p e He i g h t I f W a l l If B e r m Ad d ' t n l Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( b o t t o m ) He i g h t Segment Mi n Ma x $ p e r $ p e r To p Ru n : R i s e $ p e r X Y Z at Seg Ht Perturbs O n Important Un i t Un i t Wi d t h Un i t Po i n t Incre-#Up #Dn Struct?Reflec- Ar e a V o l . L e n g t h ment t i o n s ? ft f t $ / s q f t $ / c u y d f t f t : f t $ / f t f t f t f t f t f t B a r r i e r 1 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 6 1 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 7 1 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 8 1 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 9 1 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 0 1 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 1 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 1 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 2 1 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 1 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 3 1 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 4 1 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 5 1 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 6 1 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 7 1 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 8 1 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 9 1 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 0 1 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 2 1 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 5 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 3 1 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 4 1 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 5 1 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 6 1 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 7 1 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 8 1 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 9 1 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 0 1 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 1 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 2 1 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 3 1 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 5 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 4 1 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 5 1 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 6 1 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 7 1 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 8 1 9 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 9 1 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 1 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 0 3 2 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 4 2 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 5 2 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 6 2 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 7 2 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 9 2 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 3 2 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 4 2 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 5 2 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 6 2 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 8 2 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 9 2 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 0 2 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 5 2 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 6 2 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 7 2 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 8 2 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 9 2 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 0 2 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 1 2 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 4 2 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 5 2 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 6 2 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 7 2 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 8 2 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 9 2 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 0 2 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 1 2 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 2 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 3 2 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 5 2 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 6 2 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 7 2 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 8 2 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 9 2 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 0 2 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 1 2 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 2 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 3 2 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 4 2 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 2 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 5 5 2 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 6 2 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 7 2 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 8 2 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 9 2 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 0 2 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 1 2 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 3 2 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 4 2 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 5 2 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 6 2 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 7 2 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 2 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 8 2 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 9 2 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 0 2 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 1 2 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 2 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 3 2 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 4 2 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 5 2 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 6 2 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 7 2 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 8 2 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 9 2 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 0 2 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 2 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 3 2 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 4 2 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 5 2 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 6 2 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 7 2 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 8 2 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 9 2 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 0 2 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 1 2 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 2 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 3 2 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 4 2 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 5 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 5 2 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 6 2 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 7 2 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 8 2 9 8 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 9 2 9 9 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 2 3 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 4 3 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 5 3 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 6 3 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 3 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 0 7 3 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 8 3 0 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 9 3 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 9 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 9 3 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 0 3 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 6 3 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 7 3 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 8 3 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 9 3 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 5 3 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 6 3 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 7 3 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 8 3 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 9 3 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 0 3 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 6 3 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 7 3 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 8 3 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 9 3 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 0 3 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 1 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 4 3 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 5 3 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 6 3 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 7 3 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 8 3 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 9 3 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 4 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 1 3 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 2 3 6 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 3 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 4 3 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 5 3 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 6 3 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 7 3 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 8 3 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 0 3 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 1 3 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 2 3 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 3 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 5 3 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 6 3 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 7 3 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 8 3 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 I - 5 E O S W a l l W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 7 3 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 8 3 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 9 3 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 0 3 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 8 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 1 3 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 2 3 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 3 5 4 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 5 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 Ca l c u l a t e d w i t h T N M 2 . 5 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g BA R R I E R D E S I G N : I N P U T H E I G H T S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e AT M O S P H E R I C S : 6 8 d e g F , 5 0 % R H of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h a p p r o v a l o f F H W A . Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Ex i s t i n g No B a r r i e r Wi t h B a r r i e r LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h In c r e a s e o v e r e x i s t i n g T y p e Ca l c u l a t e d No i s e R e d u c t i o n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Im p a c t LA e q 1 h Ca l c u l a t e d Goal Calculated Su b ' l I n c minus Goal dB A d B A d B A d B d B d B A d B d B d B E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 5 6 5 6 7 . 5 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 6 6 5 6 7 . 6 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 6 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 1 6 5 6 7 . 1 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 0 . 0 5 5 . 2 7 0 5 5 . 2 1 0 - - - - 55 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 0 . 0 6 5 . 9 7 0 6 5 . 9 1 0 - - - - 65 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 8 6 5 6 9 . 8 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 4 6 5 6 9 . 4 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 9 6 5 6 8 . 9 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 7 6 5 6 8 . 7 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 7 6 5 6 8 . 7 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 6 6 5 6 8 . 6 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 6 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 D w e l l i n g U n i t s # D U s N o i s e R e d u c t i o n M i n A v g M a x d B d B d B A l l S e l e c t e d 11 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l I m p a c t e d 9 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l t h a t m e e t N R G o a l 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P r o j e c t s \ J e f f e r s o n S t ad i u m P a r k R e s i \ E x i s t i n g 1 10 March 2016 IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g w P r o j of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h t h e a p p r o v a l o f F H W A Ro a d w a y Po i n t s Na m e Wi d t h Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( p a v e m e n t ) Fl o w C o n t r o l Segment X Y Z Co n t r o l Sp e e d Percent Pvmt On De v i c e Co n s t r a i n t Vehicles Type Struct?Affected ft f t f t f t m p h % K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d 1 1 4 . 8 p o i n t 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 4 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 G e n e A u t r e y W a y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 5 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 6 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 7 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 O r a n g e w o o d A v e 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 0 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 I - 5 2 9 8 . 6 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 6 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 9 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 0 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 6 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A r t i s a n C o u r t 2 6 . 2 p o i n t 1 3 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 7 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 4 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 7 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 5 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 6 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 P r i v a t e D r i v e w a y 2 6 . 2 p o i n t 1 7 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 8 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 8 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 1 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g w P r o j Ro a d w a y P o i n t s Na m e Na m e No . Se g m e n t Au t o s MT r u c k s HT r u c k s Bu s e s Motorcycles VS V S V S V S V S ve h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d p o i n t 1 1 3 2 2 0 4 0 6 6 4 0 3 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 G e n e A u t r e y W a y p o i n t 3 3 5 6 6 3 5 1 2 3 5 6 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 5 6 6 3 5 1 2 3 5 6 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 5 6 6 3 5 1 2 3 5 6 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 5 6 6 3 5 1 2 3 5 6 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 O r a n g e w o o d A v e p o i n t 5 5 2 3 0 1 4 0 4 7 4 0 2 4 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d p o i n t 7 7 2 8 6 0 4 0 5 9 4 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y p o i n t 9 9 2 8 6 0 4 0 5 9 4 0 3 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 I - 5 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 A r t i s a n C o u r t p o i n t 1 3 1 3 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 4 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 5 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 1 6 P r i v a t e D r i v e w a y p o i n t 1 7 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 8 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 1 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g w P r o j Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Co o r d i n a t e s ( g r o u n d ) He i g h t In p u t S o u n d L e v e l s a n d C r i t e r i a A c t i v e X Y Z ab o v e Ex i s t i n g Im p a c t C r i t e r i a N R in Gr o u n d LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h Sub'l Goal Calc. ft f t f t f t d B A d B A d B d B B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 1 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r N W s i d e 1 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r N W s i d e 1 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r N W s i d e 1 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 1 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 2 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S E s i d e 2 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S E s i d e 2 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S E s i d e 2 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N E s i d e 3 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N E s i d e 3 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 4 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N E s i d e 3 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 3 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 3 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 3 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 1 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S 92 8 9 R o o f t o p D e c k 3 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 0 6 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y P u b l i c P a r k 3 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 2 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g w P r o j Ba r r i e r Po i n t s Na m e Ty p e He i g h t I f W a l l If B e r m Ad d ' t n l Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( b o t t o m ) He i g h t Segment Mi n Ma x $ p e r $ p e r To p Ru n : R i s e $ p e r X Y Z at Seg Ht Perturbs O n Important Un i t Un i t Wi d t h Un i t Po i n t Incre-#Up #Dn Struct?Reflec- Ar e a V o l . L e n g t h ment t i o n s ? ft f t $ / s q f t $ / c u y d f t f t : f t $ / f t f t f t f t f t f t B a r r i e r 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 0 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 1 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 4 1 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 2 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 6 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 7 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 8 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 9 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 0 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 1 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 2 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 3 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 4 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 6 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 5 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 5 7 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 8 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 9 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 0 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 1 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 2 6 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 3 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 4 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 5 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 6 7 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 8 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 9 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 7 2 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 4 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 5 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 6 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 7 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 8 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 9 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 0 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 2 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 3 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 6 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 7 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 3 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 0 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 1 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 9 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 9 2 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 3 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 4 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 5 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 2 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 B a r r i e r 1 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 9 6 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 8 9 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 9 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 2 1 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 3 1 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 4 1 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 1 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 5 1 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 7 1 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 8 1 0 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 4 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 9 1 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 1 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 3 1 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 4 1 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 5 1 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 6 1 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 7 1 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 8 1 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 9 1 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 0 1 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 4 1 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 5 1 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 6 1 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 7 1 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 8 1 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 9 1 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 0 1 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 2 1 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 4 1 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 5 1 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 4 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 6 1 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 7 1 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 8 1 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 9 1 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 0 1 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 1 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 2 1 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 3 1 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 4 1 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 5 1 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 2 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 6 1 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 7 1 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 3 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 1 4 8 1 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 9 1 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 0 1 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 1 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 3 1 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 6 1 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 7 1 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 8 1 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 7 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 1 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 6 1 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 7 1 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 8 1 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 9 1 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 0 1 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 1 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 1 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 2 1 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 1 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 3 1 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 4 1 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 5 1 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 6 1 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 7 1 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 8 1 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 9 1 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 0 1 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 2 1 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 5 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 3 1 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 4 1 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 5 1 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 6 1 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 7 1 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 8 1 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 9 1 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 0 1 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 1 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 2 1 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 3 1 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 5 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 4 1 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 5 1 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 6 1 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 7 1 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 8 1 9 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 9 1 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 3 2 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 4 2 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 5 2 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 6 2 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 7 2 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 4 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 0 9 2 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 3 2 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 4 2 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 5 2 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 6 2 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 8 2 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 9 2 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 0 2 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 5 2 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 6 2 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 7 2 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 8 2 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 9 2 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 0 2 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 1 2 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 4 2 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 5 2 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 6 2 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 7 2 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 8 2 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 9 2 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 0 2 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 1 2 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 2 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 3 2 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 5 2 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 6 2 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 7 2 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 8 2 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 9 2 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 0 2 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 1 2 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 2 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 3 2 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 4 2 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 5 2 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 6 2 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 7 2 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 8 2 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 9 2 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 5 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 6 0 2 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 1 2 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 3 2 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 4 2 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 5 2 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 6 2 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 7 2 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 2 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 8 2 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 9 2 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 0 2 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 1 2 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 2 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 3 2 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 4 2 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 5 2 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 6 2 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 7 2 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 8 2 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 9 2 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 0 2 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 2 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 3 2 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 4 2 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 5 2 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 6 2 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 7 2 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 8 2 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 9 2 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 0 2 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 1 2 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 2 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 3 2 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 4 2 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 5 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 5 2 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 6 2 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 7 2 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 8 2 9 8 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 9 2 9 9 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 2 3 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 4 3 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 5 3 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 6 3 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 7 3 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 8 3 0 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 9 3 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 9 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 6 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 9 3 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 0 3 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 6 3 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 7 3 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 8 3 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 9 3 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 5 3 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 6 3 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 7 3 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 8 3 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 9 3 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 0 3 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 6 3 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 7 3 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 8 3 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 9 3 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 0 3 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 1 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 4 3 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 5 3 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 6 3 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 7 3 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 8 3 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 9 3 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 1 3 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 2 3 6 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 3 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 4 3 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 7 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 6 5 3 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 6 3 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 7 3 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 8 3 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 0 3 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 1 3 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 2 3 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 3 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 5 3 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 6 3 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 7 3 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 8 3 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 9 3 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 0 3 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 I - 5 E O S W a l l W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 7 3 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 8 3 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 9 3 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 0 3 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 8 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 1 3 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 2 3 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 3 5 4 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 8 10 March 2016 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 Ca l c u l a t e d w i t h T N M 2 . 5 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k E x i s t i n g w P r o j BA R R I E R D E S I G N : I N P U T H E I G H T S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e AT M O S P H E R I C S : 6 8 d e g F , 5 0 % R H of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h a p p r o v a l o f F H W A . Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Ex i s t i n g No B a r r i e r Wi t h B a r r i e r LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h In c r e a s e o v e r e x i s t i n g T y p e Ca l c u l a t e d No i s e R e d u c t i o n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Im p a c t LA e q 1 h Ca l c u l a t e d Goal Calculated Su b ' l I n c minus Goal dB A d B A d B A d B d B d B A d B d B d B B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 8 1 0 . 0 5 4 . 0 6 5 5 4 . 0 1 0 - - - - 54 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 1 0 1 0 . 0 6 1 . 2 6 5 6 1 . 2 1 0 - - - - 61 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 1 1 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 8 6 5 6 3 . 8 1 0 - - - - 63 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r N W s i d e 1 3 1 0 . 0 6 1 . 4 6 5 6 1 . 4 1 0 - - - - 61 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r N W s i d e 1 4 1 0 . 0 6 2 . 4 6 5 6 2 . 4 1 0 - - - - 62 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r N W s i d e 1 6 1 0 . 0 6 2 . 8 6 5 6 2 . 8 1 0 - - - - 62 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 1 7 1 0 . 0 6 1 . 0 6 5 6 1 . 0 1 0 - - - - 61 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 1 8 1 0 . 0 6 1 . 4 6 5 6 1 . 4 1 0 - - - - 61 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 2 0 1 0 . 0 6 1 . 7 6 5 6 1 . 7 1 0 - - - - 61 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 1 1 0 . 0 4 4 . 6 6 5 4 4 . 6 1 0 - - - - 44 . 6 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 2 1 0 . 0 4 9 . 1 6 5 4 9 . 1 1 0 - - - - 49 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 3 1 0 . 0 5 2 . 3 6 5 5 2 . 3 1 0 - - - - 52 . 3 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 4 1 0 . 0 5 6 . 7 6 5 5 6 . 7 1 0 - - - - 56 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 5 1 0 . 0 5 6 . 8 6 5 5 6 . 8 1 0 - - - - 56 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 6 1 0 . 0 5 7 . 0 6 5 5 7 . 0 1 0 - - - - 57 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S E s i d e 2 7 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 3 6 5 6 7 . 3 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 3 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S E s i d e 2 8 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 6 6 5 6 7 . 6 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 6 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S E s i d e 2 9 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 2 6 5 6 7 . 2 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N E s i d e 3 0 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 0 6 5 6 7 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N E s i d e 3 1 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 5 6 5 6 7 . 5 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N E s i d e 3 2 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 0 6 5 6 7 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 3 3 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 4 6 5 6 3 . 4 1 0 - - - - 63 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 3 5 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 6 6 5 6 3 . 6 1 0 - - - - 63 . 6 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 3 6 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 5 6 5 6 3 . 5 1 0 - - - - 63 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 R o o f t o p D e c k 3 7 1 0 . 0 6 5 . 3 6 5 6 5 . 3 1 0 S n d L v l 65 . 3 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 1 10 M RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S 92 8 9 P u b l i c P a r k 3 8 1 0 . 0 5 0 . 0 6 5 5 0 . 0 1 0 - - - - 50 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 9 6 5 6 7 . 9 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 0 6 5 6 8 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 5 6 5 6 7 . 5 1 0 S n d L v l 67 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 0 . 0 5 6 . 1 7 0 5 6 . 1 1 0 - - - - 56 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 0 . 0 6 6 . 5 7 0 6 6 . 5 1 0 - - - - 66 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 0 . 0 7 0 . 1 6 5 7 0 . 1 1 0 S n d L v l 70 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 8 6 5 6 9 . 8 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 2 6 5 6 9 . 2 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 9 6 5 6 8 . 9 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 0 6 5 6 9 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 8 6 5 6 8 . 8 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 D w e l l i n g U n i t s # D U s N o i s e R e d u c t i o n M i n A v g M a x d B d B d B A l l S e l e c t e d 37 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l I m p a c t e d 16 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l t h a t m e e t N R G o a l 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ E x i s t w P r o j 2 10 M IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h t h e a p p r o v a l o f F H W A Ro a d w a y Po i n t s Na m e Wi d t h Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( p a v e m e n t ) Fl o w C o n t r o l Segment X Y Z Co n t r o l Sp e e d Percent Pvmt On De v i c e Co n s t r a i n t Vehicles Type Struct?Affected ft f t f t f t m p h % K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d 1 1 4 . 8 p o i n t 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 4 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 G e n e A u t r e y W a y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 5 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 6 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 7 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 O r a n g e w o o d A v e 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 0 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 I - 5 2 9 8 . 6 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 6 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 9 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 0 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 6 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 1 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e Ro a d w a y P o i n t s Na m e Na m e No . Se g m e n t Au t o s MT r u c k s HT r u c k s Bu s e s Motorcycles VS V S V S V S V S ve h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d p o i n t 1 1 4 0 1 9 4 0 8 3 4 0 4 1 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 G e n e A u t r e y W a y p o i n t 3 3 7 6 0 3 5 1 6 3 5 8 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 7 6 0 3 5 1 6 3 5 8 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 7 6 0 3 5 1 6 3 5 8 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 7 6 0 3 5 1 6 3 5 8 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 O r a n g e w o o d A v e p o i n t 5 5 2 2 5 3 4 0 4 6 4 0 2 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d p o i n t 7 7 3 5 2 0 4 0 7 3 4 0 3 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y p o i n t 9 9 3 5 2 0 4 0 7 3 4 0 3 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 I - 5 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 1 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Co o r d i n a t e s ( g r o u n d ) He i g h t In p u t S o u n d L e v e l s a n d C r i t e r i a A c t i v e X Y Z ab o v e Ex i s t i n g Im p a c t C r i t e r i a N R in Gr o u n d LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h Sub'l Goal Calc. ft f t f t f t d B A d B A d B d B E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 1 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e Ba r r i e r Po i n t s Na m e Ty p e He i g h t I f W a l l If B e r m Ad d ' t n l Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( b o t t o m ) He i g h t Segment Mi n Ma x $ p e r $ p e r To p Ru n : R i s e $ p e r X Y Z at Seg Ht Perturbs O n Important Un i t Un i t Wi d t h Un i t Po i n t Incre-#Up #Dn Struct?Reflec- Ar e a V o l . L e n g t h ment t i o n s ? ft f t $ / s q f t $ / c u y d f t f t : f t $ / f t f t f t f t f t f t B a r r i e r 1 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 6 1 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 7 1 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 8 1 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 9 1 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 0 1 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 1 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 1 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 2 1 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 1 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 3 1 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 4 1 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 5 1 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 6 1 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 7 1 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 8 1 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 9 1 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 0 1 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 2 1 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 5 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 3 1 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 4 1 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 5 1 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 6 1 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 7 1 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 8 1 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 9 1 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 0 1 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 1 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 2 1 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 3 1 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 5 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 4 1 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 5 1 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 6 1 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 7 1 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 8 1 9 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 9 1 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 1 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 0 3 2 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 4 2 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 5 2 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 6 2 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 7 2 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 9 2 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 3 2 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 4 2 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 5 2 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 6 2 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 8 2 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 9 2 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 0 2 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 5 2 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 6 2 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 7 2 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 8 2 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 9 2 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 0 2 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 1 2 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 4 2 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 5 2 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 6 2 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 7 2 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 8 2 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 9 2 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 0 2 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 1 2 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 2 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 3 2 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 5 2 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 6 2 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 7 2 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 8 2 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 9 2 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 0 2 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 1 2 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 2 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 3 2 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 4 2 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 2 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 5 5 2 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 6 2 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 7 2 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 8 2 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 9 2 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 0 2 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 1 2 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 3 2 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 4 2 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 5 2 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 6 2 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 7 2 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 2 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 8 2 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 9 2 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 0 2 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 1 2 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 2 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 3 2 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 4 2 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 5 2 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 6 2 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 7 2 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 8 2 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 9 2 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 0 2 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 2 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 3 2 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 4 2 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 5 2 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 6 2 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 7 2 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 8 2 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 9 2 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 0 2 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 1 2 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 2 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 3 2 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 4 2 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 5 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 5 2 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 6 2 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 7 2 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 8 2 9 8 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 9 2 9 9 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 2 3 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 4 3 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 5 3 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 6 3 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 3 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 0 7 3 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 8 3 0 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 9 3 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 9 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 9 3 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 0 3 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 6 3 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 7 3 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 8 3 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 9 3 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 5 3 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 6 3 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 7 3 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 8 3 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 9 3 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 0 3 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 6 3 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 7 3 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 8 3 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 9 3 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 0 3 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 1 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 4 3 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 5 3 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 6 3 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 7 3 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 8 3 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 9 3 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 4 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 1 3 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 2 3 6 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 3 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 4 3 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 5 3 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 6 3 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 7 3 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 8 3 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 0 3 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 1 3 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 2 3 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 3 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 5 3 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 6 3 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 7 3 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 8 3 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 I - 5 E O S W a l l W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 7 3 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 8 3 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 9 3 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 0 3 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 8 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 1 3 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 2 3 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 3 5 4 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 5 10 March 2016 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 Ca l c u l a t e d w i t h T N M 2 . 5 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e BA R R I E R D E S I G N : I N P U T H E I G H T S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e AT M O S P H E R I C S : 6 8 d e g F , 5 0 % R H of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h a p p r o v a l o f F H W A . Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Ex i s t i n g No B a r r i e r Wi t h B a r r i e r LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h In c r e a s e o v e r e x i s t i n g T y p e Ca l c u l a t e d No i s e R e d u c t i o n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Im p a c t LA e q 1 h Ca l c u l a t e d Goal Calculated Su b ' l I n c minus Goal dB A d B A d B A d B d B d B A d B d B d B E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 7 6 5 6 8 . 7 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 8 6 5 6 8 . 8 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 4 6 5 6 8 . 4 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 0 . 0 5 6 . 9 7 0 5 6 . 9 1 0 - - - - 56 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 4 7 0 6 7 . 4 1 0 - - - - 67 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 0 . 0 7 1 . 0 6 5 7 1 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 71 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 0 . 0 7 0 . 7 6 5 7 0 . 7 1 0 S n d L v l 70 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 0 . 0 7 0 . 1 6 5 7 0 . 1 1 0 S n d L v l 70 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 9 6 5 6 9 . 9 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 9 6 5 6 9 . 9 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 7 6 5 6 9 . 7 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 D w e l l i n g U n i t s # D U s N o i s e R e d u c t i o n M i n A v g M a x d B d B d B A l l S e l e c t e d 11 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l I m p a c t e d 9 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l t h a t m e e t N R G o a l 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e 1 10 M IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R O A D W A Y S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e w P r o j of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h t h e a p p r o v a l o f F H W A Ro a d w a y Po i n t s Na m e Wi d t h Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( p a v e m e n t ) Fl o w C o n t r o l Segment X Y Z Co n t r o l Sp e e d Percent Pvmt On De v i c e Co n s t r a i n t Vehicles Type Struct?Affected ft f t f t f t m p h % K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d 1 1 4 . 8 p o i n t 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 4 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 G e n e A u t r e y W a y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 5 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 3 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 6 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 7 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 O r a n g e w o o d A v e 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y 9 1 . 9 p o i n t 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 0 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 I - 5 2 9 8 . 6 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 6 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 9 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 0 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 6 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 A r t i s a n C o u r t 2 6 . 2 p o i n t 1 3 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 7 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 4 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 7 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 5 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 6 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 P r i v a t e D r i v e w a y 2 6 . 2 p o i n t 1 7 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 8 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 A v e r a g e p o i n t 1 8 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 3 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 1 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : T R A F F I C F O R L A e q 1 h V o l u m e s PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e w P r o j Ro a d w a y P o i n t s Na m e Na m e No . Se g m e n t Au t o s MT r u c k s HT r u c k s Bu s e s Motorcycles VS V S V S V S V S ve h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h v e h / h r m p h K a t e l l a A v e W o f S t a t e C o l l e g e B l v d p o i n t 1 1 4 2 1 5 4 0 8 7 4 0 4 3 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 G e n e A u t r e y W a y p o i n t 3 3 9 1 8 3 5 1 9 3 5 9 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 9 1 8 3 5 1 9 3 5 9 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 9 1 8 3 5 1 9 3 5 9 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 9 1 8 3 5 1 9 3 5 9 3 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 O r a n g e w o o d A v e p o i n t 5 5 2 5 4 0 4 0 5 2 4 0 2 6 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 S t a t e C o l l e g e - G e n e A u t r e y t o O r n g w d p o i n t 7 7 3 9 1 3 4 0 8 1 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 S t a t e C o l l e g e - K a t e l l a t o G e n e A u t r e y p o i n t 9 9 3 9 1 3 4 0 8 1 4 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 I - 5 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 1 2 5 9 8 6 5 8 3 5 6 5 4 8 7 6 5 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 A r t i s a n C o u r t p o i n t 1 3 1 3 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 4 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 5 2 2 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 1 6 P r i v a t e D r i v e w a y p o i n t 1 7 1 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 8 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 1 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e w P r o j Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Co o r d i n a t e s ( g r o u n d ) He i g h t In p u t S o u n d L e v e l s a n d C r i t e r i a A c t i v e X Y Z ab o v e Ex i s t i n g Im p a c t C r i t e r i a N R in Gr o u n d LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h Sub'l Goal Calc. ft f t f t f t d B A d B A d B d B B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 1 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r N W s i d e 1 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r N W s i d e 1 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r N W s i d e 1 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 1 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 2 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S E s i d e 2 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S E s i d e 2 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S E s i d e 2 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N E s i d e 3 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N E s i d e 3 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 4 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N E s i d e 3 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 3 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 3 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 3 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 1 IN P U T : R E C E I V E R S 92 8 9 R o o f t o p D e c k 3 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 0 6 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y P u b l i c P a r k 3 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 7 0 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 2 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 5 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 6 5 1 0 . 0 8 . 0 Y C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 2 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e w P r o j Ba r r i e r Po i n t s Na m e Ty p e He i g h t I f W a l l If B e r m Ad d ' t n l Na m e No . Co o r d i n a t e s ( b o t t o m ) He i g h t Segment Mi n Ma x $ p e r $ p e r To p Ru n : R i s e $ p e r X Y Z at Seg Ht Perturbs O n Important Un i t Un i t Wi d t h Un i t Po i n t Incre-#Up #Dn Struct?Reflec- Ar e a V o l . L e n g t h ment t i o n s ? ft f t $ / s q f t $ / c u y d f t f t : f t $ / f t f t f t f t f t f t B a r r i e r 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 0 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 1 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 4 1 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 2 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 4 4 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 6 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 7 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 8 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 9 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 0 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 1 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 2 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 3 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 4 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 5 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 6 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 6 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 4 5 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 5 7 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 8 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 5 9 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 0 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 1 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 2 6 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 3 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 4 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 5 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 6 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 6 7 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 8 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 6 9 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 7 2 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 4 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 5 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 6 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 7 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 8 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 7 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 9 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 0 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 2 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 3 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 6 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 7 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 7 3 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 8 8 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 0 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 1 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 8 9 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 9 2 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 3 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 4 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 5 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 2 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 B a r r i e r 1 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 9 6 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 8 9 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 9 9 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 0 1 0 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 1 1 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 2 1 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 3 1 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 4 1 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 1 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 5 1 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 7 1 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 8 1 0 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 4 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 0 9 1 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 0 1 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 1 1 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 2 1 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 1 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 3 1 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 4 1 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 5 1 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 6 1 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 7 1 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 8 1 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 1 9 1 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 0 1 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 1 1 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 2 1 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 3 1 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 4 1 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 5 1 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 1 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 6 1 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 7 1 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 8 1 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 2 9 1 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 0 1 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 1 1 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 2 1 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 3 1 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 4 1 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 5 1 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 4 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 6 1 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 7 1 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 8 1 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 3 9 1 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 0 1 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 1 1 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 2 1 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 3 1 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 4 1 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 5 1 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 2 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 6 1 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 7 1 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 3 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 1 4 8 1 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 4 9 1 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 0 1 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 1 1 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 3 1 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 6 1 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 7 1 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 5 8 1 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 7 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 1 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 6 1 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 7 1 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 8 1 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 6 9 1 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 0 1 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 1 1 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 1 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 2 1 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 1 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 3 1 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 4 1 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 5 1 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 6 1 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 7 1 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 8 1 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 7 9 1 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 0 1 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 1 1 8 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 2 1 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 5 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 3 1 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 4 1 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 4 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 5 1 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 6 1 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 5 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 7 1 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 8 1 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 8 9 1 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 3 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 0 1 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 1 1 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 2 1 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 1 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 3 1 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 5 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 4 1 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 4 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 5 1 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 6 1 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 7 1 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 8 1 9 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 1 9 9 1 9 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 0 2 0 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 1 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 1 2 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 2 2 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 3 2 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 4 2 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 8 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 5 2 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 6 2 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 0 7 2 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 4 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 0 9 2 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 0 2 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 1 2 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 2 2 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 3 2 1 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 4 2 1 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 5 2 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 6 2 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 7 2 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 8 2 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 1 9 2 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 0 2 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 1 2 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 2 2 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 2 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 3 2 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 4 2 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 1 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 5 2 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 6 2 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 7 2 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 8 2 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 2 9 2 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 0 2 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 0 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 1 2 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 3 2 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 5 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 4 2 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 5 2 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 6 2 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 7 2 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 8 2 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 3 9 2 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 0 2 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 1 2 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 3 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 2 2 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 3 2 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 5 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 4 2 4 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 5 2 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 6 2 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 7 2 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 8 2 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 4 9 2 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 0 2 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 1 5 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 1 2 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 9 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 2 2 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 3 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 3 2 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 4 2 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 5 2 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 6 2 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 6 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 7 2 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 8 2 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 4 0 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 5 9 2 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 5 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 2 6 0 2 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 9 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 1 2 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 2 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 3 2 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 4 2 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 5 2 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 6 2 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 7 2 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 2 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 8 2 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 6 9 2 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 0 2 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 0 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 1 2 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 8 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 2 2 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 3 2 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 4 2 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 5 2 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 8 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 6 2 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 1 6 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 2 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 7 2 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 9 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 8 2 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 7 9 2 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 6 3 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 0 2 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 2 2 8 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 3 2 8 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 4 2 8 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 4 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 5 2 8 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 3 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 6 2 8 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 7 2 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 1 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 8 2 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 2 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 8 9 2 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 7 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 0 2 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 1 2 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 3 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 2 2 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 9 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 3 2 9 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 9 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 4 2 9 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 8 5 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 5 2 9 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 6 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 6 2 9 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 7 2 9 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 8 2 9 8 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 0 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 2 9 9 2 9 9 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 0 3 0 0 3 7 , 4 6 0 , 3 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 1 3 0 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 2 3 0 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 4 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 3 3 0 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 6 9 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 7 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 4 3 0 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 3 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 6 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 5 3 0 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 6 3 0 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 7 3 0 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 8 3 0 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 7 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 0 9 3 0 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 9 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 0 3 1 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 9 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 1 3 1 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 6 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 1 2 3 1 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 9 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 3 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 5 3 1 5 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 6 3 1 6 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 6 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 7 3 1 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 9 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 8 3 1 8 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 1 9 3 1 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 0 3 2 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 1 3 2 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 2 3 2 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 0 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 3 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 3 3 2 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 4 3 2 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 5 3 2 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 6 3 2 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 2 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 7 3 2 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 8 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 8 3 2 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 8 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 2 9 3 2 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 4 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 0 3 3 0 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 7 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 1 3 3 1 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 3 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 7 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 2 3 3 2 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 3 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 2 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 4 3 3 4 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 1 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 8 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 5 3 3 5 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 2 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 6 3 3 6 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 7 3 3 7 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 8 3 3 8 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 5 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 3 9 3 3 9 3 7 , 4 5 9 , 4 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 8 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 1 6 . 4 0 B a r r i e r 3 9 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 0 3 4 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 1 3 4 1 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 2 3 4 2 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 3 3 4 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 8 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 4 7 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 0 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 5 3 4 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 6 3 4 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 7 3 4 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 8 3 4 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 6 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 4 9 3 4 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 3 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 0 3 5 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 0 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 1 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 1 3 5 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 1 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 2 3 5 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 9 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 5 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 3 3 5 3 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 6 5 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 2 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 4 3 5 4 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 8 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 5 2 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 2 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 5 3 5 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 5 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 6 3 5 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 3 0 1 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 7 3 5 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 6 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 8 3 5 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 1 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 0 6 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 9 . 3 7 B a r r i e r 4 3 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 5 9 3 5 9 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 0 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 1 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 0 3 6 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 8 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 5 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 1 3 6 1 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 7 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 2 3 6 2 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 9 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 1 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 4 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 3 3 6 3 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 4 3 6 4 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 7 10 March 2016 IN P U T : B A R R I E R S 92 8 9 p o i n t 3 6 5 3 6 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 2 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 6 3 6 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 3 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 7 3 6 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 3 1 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 8 3 6 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 6 9 3 6 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 5 6 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 0 3 7 0 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 2 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 9 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 5 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 1 3 7 1 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 3 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 2 3 7 2 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 3 3 7 3 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 7 6 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 4 3 7 4 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 5 7 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 8 8 9 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 6 0 . 0 4 B a r r i e r 4 6 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 5 3 7 5 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 6 3 7 6 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 6 0 6 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 7 3 7 7 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 5 2 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 8 3 7 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 0 3 6 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 5 4 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 B a r r i e r 4 7 W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 7 9 3 7 9 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 7 7 8 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 0 3 8 0 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 4 8 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 0 7 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 3 2 . 8 1 I - 5 E O S W a l l W 0. 0 0 1 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 0 . 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 7 3 8 7 3 7 , 4 5 8 , 3 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 6 9 , 7 6 4 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 8 3 8 8 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 7 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 0 , 4 8 2 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 8 9 3 8 9 3 7 , 4 5 7 , 1 2 4 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 2 0 0 . 0 3 2 8 . 0 8 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 0 3 9 0 3 7 , 4 5 6 , 5 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 1 , 9 1 8 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 1 3 9 1 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 9 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 2 , 6 3 6 . 0 3 6 0 . 8 9 4 . 9 2 0 . 0 0 0 0 p o i n t 3 9 2 3 9 2 3 7 , 4 5 5 , 3 2 0 . 0 1 2 , 2 7 3 , 3 5 4 . 0 3 4 4 . 4 9 4 . 9 2 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T A D I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 8 10 March 2016 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S 92 8 9 Du d e k 10 M a r c h 2 0 1 6 M G r e e n e TN M 2 . 5 Ca l c u l a t e d w i t h T N M 2 . 5 RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S PR O J E C T / C O N T R A C T : 92 8 9 RU N : Je f f e r s o n S t a d i u m P a r k F u t u r e w P r o j BA R R I E R D E S I G N : I N P U T H E I G H T S Av e r a g e p a v e m e n t t y p e s h a l l b e u s e d u n l e s s a S t a t e h i g h w a y a g e n c y s u b s t a n t i a t e s t h e u s e AT M O S P H E R I C S : 6 8 d e g F , 5 0 % R H of a d i f f e r e n t t y p e w i t h a p p r o v a l o f F H W A . Re c e i v e r Na m e No . #D U s Ex i s t i n g No B a r r i e r Wi t h B a r r i e r LA e q 1 h LA e q 1 h In c r e a s e o v e r e x i s t i n g T y p e Ca l c u l a t e d No i s e R e d u c t i o n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Ca l c u l a t e d Cr i t ' n Im p a c t LA e q 1 h Ca l c u l a t e d Goal Calculated Su b ' l I n c minus Goal dB A d B A d B A d B d B d B A d B d B d B B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 8 1 0 . 0 5 4 . 1 6 5 5 4 . 1 1 0 - - - - 54 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 1 0 1 0 . 0 6 1 . 2 6 5 6 1 . 2 1 0 - - - - 61 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 1 1 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 8 6 5 6 3 . 8 1 0 - - - - 63 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 1 s t F l r N W s i d e 1 3 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 4 6 5 6 3 . 4 1 0 - - - - 63 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 3 r d F l r N W s i d e 1 4 1 0 . 0 6 4 . 0 6 5 6 4 . 0 1 0 - - - - 64 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g A - 5 t h F l r N W s i d e 1 6 1 0 . 0 6 4 . 2 6 5 6 4 . 2 1 0 - - - - 64 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 1 7 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 0 6 5 6 3 . 0 1 0 - - - - 63 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 1 8 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 2 6 5 6 3 . 2 1 0 - - - - 63 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 2 0 1 0 . 0 6 3 . 4 6 5 6 3 . 4 1 0 - - - - 63 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 1 1 0 . 0 4 4 . 8 6 5 4 4 . 8 1 0 - - - - 44 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 2 1 0 . 0 4 9 . 3 6 5 4 9 . 3 1 0 - - - - 49 . 3 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g B - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 3 1 0 . 0 5 2 . 4 6 5 5 2 . 4 1 0 - - - - 52 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S s i d e 2 4 1 0 . 0 5 8 . 0 6 5 5 8 . 0 1 0 - - - - 58 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S s i d e 2 5 1 0 . 0 5 8 . 1 6 5 5 8 . 1 1 0 - - - - 58 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S s i d e 2 6 1 0 . 0 5 8 . 2 6 5 5 8 . 2 1 0 - - - - 58 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r S E s i d e 2 7 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 7 6 5 6 8 . 7 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 7 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r S E s i d e 2 8 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 0 6 5 6 9 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r S E s i d e 2 9 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 5 6 5 6 8 . 5 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N E s i d e 3 0 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 4 6 5 6 8 . 4 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N E s i d e 3 1 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 8 6 5 6 8 . 8 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N E s i d e 3 2 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 3 6 5 6 8 . 3 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 3 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 1 s t F l r N s i d e 3 3 1 0 . 0 6 5 . 0 6 5 6 5 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 65 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 3 r d F l r N s i d e 3 5 1 0 . 0 6 5 . 2 6 5 6 5 . 2 1 0 S n d L v l 65 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 B u i l d i n g C - 5 t h F l r N s i d e 3 6 1 0 . 0 6 5 . 0 6 5 6 5 . 0 1 0 S n d L v l 65 . 0 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 R o o f t o p D e c k 3 7 1 0 . 0 6 5 . 4 6 5 6 5 . 4 1 0 S n d L v l 65 . 4 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 1 10 M RE S U L T S : S O U N D L E V E L S 92 8 9 P u b l i c P a r k 3 8 1 0 . 0 5 0 . 2 6 5 5 0 . 2 1 0 - - - - 50 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 0 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 2 6 5 6 9 . 2 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 2 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 1 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 3 6 5 6 9 . 3 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 3 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i S o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 2 1 0 . 0 6 8 . 8 6 5 6 8 . 8 1 0 S n d L v l 68 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e W o f P r o j 4 4 1 0 . 0 5 7 . 5 7 0 5 7 . 5 1 0 - - - - 57 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 C o m m e r c i a l U s e N o f P r o j 4 5 1 0 . 0 6 7 . 9 7 0 6 7 . 9 1 0 - - - - 67 . 9 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 1 s t F l r 4 6 1 0 . 0 7 1 . 5 6 5 7 1 . 5 1 0 S n d L v l 71 . 5 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 3 r d F l r 4 7 1 0 . 0 7 1 . 1 6 5 7 1 . 1 1 0 S n d L v l 71 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j e c t - 5 t h F l r 4 8 1 0 . 0 7 0 . 6 6 5 7 0 . 6 1 0 S n d L v l 70 . 6 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 1 s t F l r 5 0 1 0 . 0 7 0 . 1 6 5 7 0 . 1 1 0 S n d L v l 70 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 3 r d F l r 5 1 1 0 . 0 7 0 . 1 6 5 7 0 . 1 1 0 S n d L v l 70 . 1 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 E x i s t R e s i N o f P r o j K a t e l l a - 5 t h F l r 5 2 1 0 . 0 6 9 . 8 6 5 6 9 . 8 1 0 S n d L v l 69 . 8 0 . 0 8 - 8 . 0 D w e l l i n g U n i t s # D U s N o i s e R e d u c t i o n M i n A v g M a x d B d B d B A l l S e l e c t e d 37 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l I m p a c t e d 19 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 A l l t h a t m e e t N R G o a l 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 0 . 0 C: \ T N M 2 5 \ P R O J E C T S \ J E F F E R S O N S T AD I U M P A R K R E S I \ F u t u r e w P r o j 2 10 M Calculate Groundborne Vibration using FTA Noise and Vibration Manual guidance (Chapter 12) Lv(D) = Lv (25 ft) – 30log(D/25)  PPVequip = PPVref x (25/D)1.5 Ouput Equipment PPVref   (inches/sec)D (feet) PPVequip  (inches/s ec) Loaded Truck 0.076 60 0.020 Caisson Drilling 0.089 60 0.024 1.518 112 0.644 104 0.734 105 0.170 93 0.202 94 0.008 66 0.017 75 0.210 94 0.089 87 0.089 87 0.089 87 0.076 86 0.035 79 0.003 58 12-12 Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment Table 12-2. Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Caisson drilling Loaded trucks Jackhammer Vibratory Roller Hoe Ram Large bulldozer Clam shovel drop (slurry wall) Hydromill (slurry wall) in soil in rock Pile Driver (impact) upper range typical Pile Driver (sonic) upper range typical Input Small bulldozer † RMS velocity in decibels (VdB) re 1 micro-inch/second PPV at 25 ft (in/sec) Approximate Lv† at 25 ft APPENDIX I Traffic Impact Study Traffic Impact Study Jefferson Stadium Park Anaheim, California February 18, 2016 Prepared for Prepared by -i- ATTESTATION This report has been prepared by, and under the direction of, the undersigned, a duly Registered Traffic Engineer and Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Except as noted, the undersigned attests to the technical information contained herein, and has judged to be acceptable the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data for this report, upon which findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based. ___________________________________ _____________________ James H. Kawamura, P.E. Date: February 18, 2016 Registered Traffic Engineer No. TR1110 Registered Civil Engineer No. C30560 ii TABLE OF CONTENTS ATTESTATION ....................................................................................................................... i I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY .................................................................................................... 1 Project Description ............................................................................................................ 1 Traffic Impact Study .......................................................................................................... 1 Study Findings ................................................................................................................... 2 Study Conclusions ............................................................................................................. 2 Recommendations ............................................................................................................ 4 II. INTRODUCTION ............................................................................................................... 5 Background ....................................................................................................................... 5 Proposed Project ............................................................................................................... 5 Figure 1 – Jefferson Stadium Park Site Plan ............................................................... 6 Site Location and Existing Uses ....................................................................................... 6 Figure 2 – Project Site Location within the Platinum Triangle ..................................... 7 Figure 3 – Aerial Perspective of Project Site ............................................................... 8 Traffic Impact Study Area ................................................................................................. 8 Study Intersections & Roadway Segments ...................................................................... 9 Table I - Study Area Roadways & Intersections .......................................................... 9 Figure 4 – Location of Study Roadway Segments & Intersections ........................... 10 Description of Roadway Segments ................................................................................ 10 Figure 5 – Gene Autry Way Street Standard ............................................................. 11 Figure 6 – State College Boulevard Street Standard ................................................ 12 Figure 7 – Connector Street Standard ....................................................................... 14 Figure 8 – Lewis Street & Katella Avenue ................................................................. 19 Figure 9 – State College Boulevard & Katella Avenue .............................................. 19 Figure 10 – Katella Avenue & Stadium Crossing ...................................................... 20 Figure 11 – Katella Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps ...................................................... 20 Figure 12 – Katella Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps ...................................................... 21 Figure 13 – State College Boulevard & Gateway ...................................................... 21 Figure 14 – State College Boulevard & Gene Autry Way ......................................... 22 Figure 15 – State College Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue .................................. 22 iii Figure 16 – Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps ............................................ 23 Figure 17 – Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps ............................................ 23 Figure 18 – The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 NB Ramps ..................... 24 Figure 19 – The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramps ..................... 24 Figure 20 – Gene Autry Way & I-5 HOV Ramps ....................................................... 25 Figure 21 – Intersection Lane Configurations ............................................................ 26 III. STUDY TERMINOLOGY ................................................................................................ 26 A.M. and P.M. Peak Hours ............................................................................................. 26 Average Daily Traffic ....................................................................................................... 27 Capacity ........................................................................................................................... 27 Level of Service ............................................................................................................... 28 Table II – Levels of Service for Roadway Classifications .......................................... 29 Table III - Signalized Intersection LOS & V/c Ratios ................................................. 29 Table IV – Unsignalized & Signalized Intersection LOS Criteria ............................... 30 Significant Transportation Impact ................................................................................... 30 Table V - Significant Transportation Impact for Project-Related Increase in V/C ..... 30 Trip Ends ......................................................................................................................... 31 Trip Generation................................................................................................................ 31 Trip Reduction ................................................................................................................. 31 Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment .................................................................................... 32 Ambient Growth ............................................................................................................... 32 IV. TRIP GENERATION ...................................................................................................... 32 Table VI - Summary of Jefferson Stadium Park Trip Generation ............................. 34 V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION/TRIP ASSIGNMENTS ................................................................ 34 Trip Distribution................................................................................................................ 34 Figure 22 – Trip Distribution Assumptions ................................................................. 35 Trip Assignments ............................................................................................................. 35 Figure 23 – Daily and Peak Hour Project-Only Trip Assignments ............................ 36 Existing Traffic – Year 2015 Conditions ......................................................................... 36 Figure 24 – Existing Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Counts - ....... 37 Existing + Project Traffic – Year 2015 Conditions .......................................................... 37 Figure 25 – Existing+Project Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic iv Volumes – Year 2015 Conditions .............................................................................. 38 Committed and Proposed Developments ...................................................................... 38 Table VII - Committed and Proposed Development Projects ................................... 39 Figure 26 – Location of Committed and Proposed Development Projects .............. 40 Existing+Ambient+Cumulative Traffic – Year 2018 Conditions ..................................... 40 Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+Project Traffic – Year 2018 Conditions ....................... 40 Figure 27 – Existing+Ambient+Cumulative Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes – Year 2018 Conditions ................................................................... 41 Figure 28 – Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+Project Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes – Year 2018 Conditions ............................................... 42 VI. EXISTING & FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE ............................................................. 43 Existing, Project, Ambient Growth, Cumulative Roadway LOS ..................................... 43 Existing & Existing+Project Intersection LOS ................................................................. 43 Table VIII – Existing (2015); Existing+PROJECT (2015); Existing+Ambient+CUMULATIVE (2018); & Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+PROJECT (2018) Roadway Segment V/C Ratio & Levels of Service ......................................................................................................... 44 Table IX – Existing & Existing+PROJECT (2015) ICU-Based LOS .......................... 44 Existing+Ambient+Cumulative & Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+Project LOS ............ 45 Table X – Existing+Ambient+CUMULATIVE (2018) & Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+PROJECT (2018) ICU-Based LOS ........................ 45 Table XI – Existing (2015) & Existing+Ambient+Project+ Cumulative (2018) HCM- Based LOS.................................................................................................................. 46 VII. SITE ACCESS, CIRCULATION, & PARKING ............................................................. 46 Street and Traffic Improvements .................................................................................... 46 Figure 29 – Gene Autry Way Improvements ............................................................. 48 Figure 30 – Union Street Improvements .................................................................... 49 Figure 31 – Artisan Way Improvements .................................................................... 50 Figure 32 – Private Street Improvements .................................................................. 51 Figure 33 – State College Boulevard Improvements ................................................. 52 Table XII: Right of Way Dedication ............................................................................ 53 Table XIII: Roadway Widening ................................................................................... 53 v Site Access ...................................................................................................................... 53 Internal Circulation ........................................................................................................... 54 Parking ............................................................................................................................. 54 VIII. STUDY FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, & RECOMMENDATIONS ............................. 54 Study Findings ................................................................................................................. 55 Study Conclusions ........................................................................................................... 55 Recommendations .......................................................................................................... 56 IX. REFERENCES ............................................................................................................... 57 APPENDIX SECTION ......................................................................................................... 58 Appendix A – Existing Roadway ADT Counts ........................................................... 59 Appendix B – Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Counts ............................ 60 Appendix C – Existing (2015) & Existing + Project (2015) Level of Service Worksheets ................................................................................................................. 61 Appendix D – Existing + Ambient + Cumulative (2018) & Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (2018) Level of Service Worksheets ....................................... 62 Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -1- Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study February 18, 2016 I. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This report documents a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) completed for the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park mixed-use project (hereinafter referred to as the Project), to be located on the southwest corner of Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard, in the City of Anaheim, California. The17.57-acre Project site is within the Platinum Triangle District of the City, and subject to various development regulations, restrictions, and agreements, such as participating in the construction and/or funding of infrastructure improvements. Project Description The proposed Project consists of a total of 1,079 multi-family dwelling units (apartments); approximately 9,800 square feet of commercial retail space; and 9,600 square feet of live/work space, divided between three separate and distinct building complexes. A separate 1.1-acre public park and new public and private streets are also part of the Project. Traffic Impact Study Under the City of Anaheim’s “Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies,” a TIS is required whenever a proposed Project is anticipated to generate 100 or more peak hour trips. Although a previous TIS report was produced in March 2007 for a more intense mixed-use project on the Project site (called The Gene Autry Experience), the City determined that, due to dissimilarities between the earlier project and the current Project, a new TIS would be required under the City’s “Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies.” The TIS was commissioned by the Project proponent and developer, JPI, San Diego, California, and performed by KHR Associates, Newport Beach, California. As part of the TIS, new traffic counts were taken at fifteen study intersections and five roadway segments. It should be noted that two additional roadway segments were subsequently added by KHR Associates in order to gain greater perspective on area-wide traffic and circulation. The City provided an updated list of approved projects within the Platinum Triangle for inclusion in the analysis portion of the TIS. JPI provided a completion date for build-out of the Project in the year 2018. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -2- The TIS focused on: a) establishing a baseline for traffic conditions at potentially impacted intersections and roadways; b) determining how much traffic could be generated by the proposed Project; c) determining if the additional traffic would result in impacts at any or all of the study intersections and roadways under various future development scenarios within the Platinum Triangle; d) determining appropriate mitigation measures should it be found that any or all of the study intersections and roadways are impacted; and e) evaluating other traffic-related issues, such as parking, transit use, and internal traffic controls. Study Findings Based on the analyses presented herein, the following findings were made: 1) New traffic counts were taken in mid-September 2015, and reflect baseline traffic conditions at study intersections and on study roadway segments. 2) A comparison of new 2015 traffic counts with traffic counts that were taken at the same study locations in 2006 indicate that the amount of traffic has stayed the same, or in some cases has been reduced. 3) The new 2015 traffic counts reflect the fact that the Project site is currently vacant, whereas in 2006, traffic generated from a large restaurant (The Catch) and light industrial uses was reflected in the count. 4) By the Project target year of 2018, the Project is estimated to generate a total of 8,114 average weekday trip ends; and 730 A.M. and 822 P.M. peak hour trips ends, respectively. 5) While the Project is, by definition, a “mixed-use” development, and the potential for “internal capture” of vehicle trips will be present, the percentage of such trip reduction is uncertain. 6) While the Project will generate some degree of regular transit use, thus potentially reducing private vehicle trips, the percentage of such trip reduction is uncertain. 7) Based on the current site plan for the Project, vehicular access will be provided via a future signalized intersection at Gene Autry Way and future Union Street; a future unsignalized private street intersection on Gene Autry Way between future Union Street and State College Boulevard, and a future connection to the existing signalized intersection at State College Boulevard and Artisan Court;. Study Conclusions Based on the above study findings, the following conclusions were made: Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -3- 1) Since new traffic counts take into consideration current land uses, traffic generated by any previous development on the subject property (i.e., restaurant and light industrial uses) cannot be deducted from the amount of traffic projected to be generated by the Project. 2) The mixed-use nature of the Project was not taken into consideration in reducing the amount of traffic projected to be generated by the Project. 3) The potential use of transit was not taken into consideration in reducing the amount of traffic projected to be generated by the Project. 4) Using counts taken in the fall of 2015, (existing traffic conditions), the levels of service at each of the study intersections, during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of weekday commute, fall within acceptable limits (i.e., “D” or better). 5) The addition of Project traffic to the 2015 volumes resulted in only slight increases in intersection delays, and intersection levels of service for each of the study intersections stayed within acceptable limits. 6) In the target year of 2018, with the addition of ambient growth (i.e., 1% per year) and cumulative development traffic (from other identified projects within the Platinum Triangle area), the levels of service at each of the study intersections during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of traffic are projected to stay within acceptable limits. 7) In the target year 2018, with the addition of Project traffic, the levels of service at each of the study intersections during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of traffic, are projected to stay within acceptable limits. 8) Using the HCM methodology to determine levels of service for State- controlled intersections (i.e., freeway ramp intersections) revealed only slight increases in delays of key turn movements, and intersection levels of service staying within acceptable limits for both the 2015 (existing), and the 2018 (existing+ambient+cumulative+Project) scenarios. 9) The three roadway segments analyzed along State College Boulevard, two segments of Katella Avenue, Gene Autry Way, and Orangewood Avenue currently operate at acceptable levels, and will continue to do so with the addition of Project traffic, ambient growth (2018) and cumulative development traffic (2018). 10) The roadway connections and parking provisions depicted on the current site plan for the Project, appear to be well situated relative to the surrounding public streets and highways network. 11) In comparing results of this study with a previous traffic study conducted for the “Experience at Gene Autry” on the same property, it was found that less traffic related impacts are anticipated with the proposed Jefferson Stadium Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -4- Park Project. The previous report identified the need for lane additions that have either been implemented since 2004, or are now unnecessary due to less anticipated Project related impacts. Further, due to the intersection of State College Boulevard and Artisan Court operating well within acceptable levels of service in the 2015 and 2018 scenarios, no additional lanes (e.g., a second northbound left-turn lane) are required. Recommendations Based on the above study findings and conclusions, the proposed Project is not anticipated to result in significantly measurable traffic impacts to any of the study street segments or intersections during the daily or A.M. or P.M. peak hours of weekday commute. Therefore, the following recommendations are made: 1) Construct Union Street from Gene Autry Way to the southern end of the Project site. 2) Complete Artisan Court street improvements on the Project site side from its present terminus west of State College Boulevard to the future Union Street. 3) Construct the intersection of Gene Autry Way and Union Street for future traffic signalization, and participate in the “fair share” cost of constructing a new traffic signal. 4) Widen Gene Autry Way to ultimate standards along the Project frontage. 5) Construct a private north-south street from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court, parallel to Union Street and restrict access to Gene Autry Way to right turn in and out only. 6) Prior to Project completion, widen State College Boulevard to ultimate standards from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court. 7) Provide various traffic controls, including signage, striping, and pavement marking, to provide safe and efficient vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle movement through and within the Project site. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -5- II. INTRODUCTION JPI, San Diego, California, recently proposed to construct a mixed-use project on a previously entitled 17.57-acre site within the Platinum Triangle District of the City of Anaheim. In response, City staff reviewed the proposed Project and determined that a Traffic Impact Study (TIS) was required per EIR No. 339, due to the fact that the proposed Project will generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by applying the Institute of Transportation Engineer’s (ITE) Trip Generation Rates to the various development components of the Project. JPI commissioned KHR Associates, Newport Beach, California, to independently undertake the TIS and document findings, conclusions, and recommendations regarding potential traffic impacts and mitigation measures to offset impacts. Input regarding the Jefferson Stadium Park project was provided by JPI and Architects Orange, Orange, California. The TIS reflects the professional opinions of KHR Associates, and may not correspond with the thoughts or preferences of JPI, the City of Anaheim, or any other interested parties. Background In 2006/2007, the site was proposed for development under a similar mix of uses, and was referred to as The Gene Autry Experience. However, the recession of late- 2007 to mid-2009 halted progress on the former project beyond demolition of site structures, and all that now remains on the site are building foundations, parking lots, and driveways. The proposed project site was previously entitled by AMB Property, L.P. (AMB), under Development Agreement No. 2006-00004, dated September 11, 2007, for the development of a mixed-use master planned community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 50,000 square feet of retail/commercial uses, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses, a conceptual pedestrian bridge crossing over State College Boulevard connecting the Gene Autry District with the Stadium District, and public parks. A Traffic Impact Analysis was prepared for the previously entitled project by LSA Associates, Inc., dated March 2007, identifying mitigation measures to address significant impacts prior to the project opening year. This study is to determine: 1) if the mitigation measures previously identified in the 2007 LSA study are required prior to completion of the proposed Project; and 2) if the Project will cause significant impacts at any of the study intersections at the Project opening year of 2018 that will need to be completed prior to completion of the Project. Proposed Project The proposed Jefferson Stadium Park mixed-use project consists of constructing up to 1,079-unit multi-family residential dwelling units, approximately 9,800 square feet Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -6- of retail space, and 9,600 square feet of “live/work” (e.g. residential unit with separate work space) on a 17.57-acre site. The proposed project will also include a 1.1-acre public park, a public connector street and a private connector street. When completed, access to the Project site will be provided via Union Street, a public street running north-south from Gene Autry Way to the south property limit; a parallel north-south private street between Gene Autry Way and Artisan Court; and Artisan Court, an east-west street running from State College Boulevard to its existing terminus adjacent the west property limit of the Anavia development. The intersection of Union Street and Gene Autry Way will be signalized to allow full- access, while the intersection of the parallel private street and Gene Autry Way will be restricted to right turns in and out of the private street. The intersections of Artisan Court and State College Boulevard, as well as Gene Autry Way and State College Boulevard, are currently signalized to accommodate all phases of traffic movement. Figure 1 depicts the most current conceptual site plan for the Project. According to JPI, the target year for completion and occupancy of Jefferson Stadium Park is 2018. Figure 1 – Jefferson Stadium Park Site Plan Site Location and Existing Uses The Project site is located within the Gene Autry District of the Platinum Triangle area of the City of Anaheim, California. The Project is a permitted use within the Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -7- Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone, with General Plan Designations of Mixed Use and Open Space. The Project site is within and makes up the entirety of Gene Autry Sub-Area B Development Area of the General Plan, and is zoned Industrial. Figure 2 illustrates the location of the Project site within the Platinum Triangle boundary. Figure 2 – Project Site Location within the Platinum TriangleA Current existing major land uses in close proximity to the Project site include Angel Stadium of Anaheim (Angel Stadium), the City National Grove of Anaheim (The Grove), Honda Center, and the recently opened Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC). Angel Stadium hosts major league baseball games and other sporting and entertainment events. The Grove is an indoor live music venue with restaurants and shops. Honda Center is a sports arena that serves as the home of the Anaheim Ducks National Hockey League team, and is also host to other sporting and entertainment events. ARTIC is a recently opened multi-modal transportation center, serving Anaheim and the region by providing transit services via OCTA, Metrolink, Amtrak, Anaheim Resort Transportation, Greyhound, taxis, and other public and private transportation providers. A The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, Mixed Use District Overview, City of Anaheim, October 2014. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -8- The Project site is currently vacant and unutilized. Previously, a popular 14,700 square foot restaurant (known as The Catch) and approximately 265,900 square feet of light industrial uses occupied the site. In 2007, the existing buildings were demolished by others in preparation for construction of The Gene Autry Experience mixed-use development. However, the recession of late-2007 to mid-2009 halted progress on the project beyond the demolition phase. All that remains on the site are building foundations, parking lots, and driveways. Figure 3 provides a recent aerial perspective of the configuration and limits of the Project site. Figure 3 – Aerial Perspective of Project Site Traffic Impact Study Area Per the Traffic and Transportation Division of the City, the limits of the TIS area correspond to the boundaries of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan area. The study area is generally bounded by Katella Avenue to the north, the Orange (SR-57) freeway to the east, and the Santa Ana (I-5) freeway to the south and west. The content and format of the TIS and this report follow the City’s “Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies.” This report summarizes the TIS process and has been prepared in order to systematically address the traffic-related concerns of the City of Anaheim and the community at-large, with respect to how the proposed project will impact the Platinum Triangle area when the project is completed in the target year 2018. It was determined by the City that an analysis of traffic impacts for Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -9- the General Plan build out year 2025 was not necessary because the proposed Project is similar enough to an earlier 2006-2007 project that was proposed for the subject site and included in the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Phase 2 Traffic Analysis Technical Memorandum. Study Intersections & Roadway Segments Study intersections and arterial roadway segments were identified by the Traffic and Transportation Division, and are listed in Table I, along with a notation of which intersections are Caltrans-controlled, either jointly with the City or autonomously. Figure 4 provides an aerial view of the study roadway segments and intersections within the general study boundaries. TABLE I - STUDY AREA ROADWAYS & INTERSECTIONS ID Roadway Segments A State College Boulevard between Katella Avenue and Cerritos Avenue B State College Boulevard between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue C State College Boulevard between Orangewood Avenue and I-5 D Katella Avenue between State College Boulevard and SR-57 E Katella Avenue between State College Boulevard and I-5 F Gene Autry Way between State College Boulevard and I-5 (Voluntary) G Orangewood Avenue between State College Boulevard and I-5 (Voluntary) No. Intersection Caltrans Control 1 Katella Avenue & I-5 SB Ramps/Manchester Avenue X 2 Katella Avenue & I-5 NB Ramps/Anaheim Way X 3 Katella Avenue & Lewis Street 4 Katella Avenue & State College Boulevard 5 Katella Avenue & Stadium Crossing 6 Katella Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps X 7 Katella Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps X 8 State College Boulevard & Gateway 9 State College Boulevard & Gene Autry Way 10 State College Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue 11 Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps X 12 Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps X 13 The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 NB Ramps X 14 The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramps X 15 Gene Autry Way & I-5 HOV Ramps X Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -10- Figure 4 – Location of Study Roadway Segments & Intersections Description of Roadway Segments The existing network of streets and highways servicing the Project site include Gene Autry Way, State College Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Orangewood Avenue, and the I-5 and SR-57 freeways. Along with the build out of Gene Autry Way, Artisan Court and Union Street will be part of the future network, when the Project and other ongoing projects in the Platinum Triangle are completed. The following briefly describes each of these existing and future roadways. Gene Autry Way – Gene Autry Way runs in an east to west direction from State College Boulevard to Haster Street, respectively. Within the limits of the Platinum Triangle, Gene Autry Way, from Santa Cruz to State College Boulevard, is classified as a Primary Arterial. According to City records, adjacent the project site, the existing half right of way of Gene Autry Way from the centerline to the southerly right of way line is 53 feet along the entire property frontage, with a centerline to southerly face- of-curb dimension of 32 feet.B At build-out, this street is required to include six B Plan No. 26543, Street Improvement, Gene Autry Way, City of Anaheim, April 2006. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -11- through lanes (three in each direction), a raised, landscaped median, and an ultimate right of way of 115 feet, inclusive of a southerly half right of way of 57.5 feet west of the transition for the intersection with State College Boulevard and 62.5 feet east of the transition (see Figure 5). The segment adjacent to the Project site is currently striped for two through lanes in each direction, plus a painted two-way left turn lane in the median area. West of the I-5 freeway, Gene Autry Way is built to ultimate City standards, and features three through travel lanes in each direction plus a raised landscaped median. Gene Autry Way provides regional high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) access to Angel Stadium, the Anaheim Resort area, and other major attractions via direct north and south on and off ramps to the I-5 freeway. Figure 5 – Gene Autry Way Street StandardC State College Boulevard – State College Boulevard runs in a north to south direction from the north City limits at the State Route 91 freeway to the south City limits at the I-5 freeway. From Gene Autry Way to the south City limits, State College Boulevard is designated a Major Arterial, requiring eight through lanes (4 in each direction), with a raised median, and an ultimate right of way of 144 feet (see Figure 6). Adjacent the project site, the existing half right of way of State College Boulevard C The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program, City of Anaheim, October 2014. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -12- from the centerline to the westerly right of way line is 60 feet, with a centerline to westerly face-of-curb dimension of 43 feet.D Figure 6 – State College Boulevard Street StandardE Katella Avenue – Katella Avenue is designated a Stadium Smart Street. It runs in an east to west direction from the east City limits at the Santa Ana River to the west City limits just west of Brookhurst Street. Katella Avenue is perhaps the single most important east-west street in the City, as it provides general regional access through the Platinum Triangle area via both the I-5 and SR-57 freeways. It directly services Angel Stadium, Honda Center, the ARTIC, and nearly all the major attractions within the Anaheim Resort area. Katella Avenue features at least three through lanes in each direction, with additional turn lanes (including separate right turn, left turn, and dual left turn lanes) at approach legs to intersections. Orangewood Avenue – Orangewood Avenue is designated a Primary Arterial. It runs in an east to west direction from the east City limits at the Santa Ana River to the west City limits at Euclid Street. Orangewood Avenue provides regional access via the SR-57 freeway interchange and features six through lanes (three in each direction) and a raised median, with provisions for left turn pockets within the Platinum Triangle. From Manchester Avenue to west of Harbor Boulevard, D Plan No. 22640, Traffic Signal Plan, State College Blvd and Gene Autry Way, City of Anaheim, November 1999; Plan No. 26543, Street Improvement, Gene Autry Way, City of Anaheim, April 2006. E The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program, City of Anaheim, October 2014. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -13- Orangewood Avenue features four through lanes (two in each direction) and a striped median, with left turn pockets at most intersections. Santa Ana (I-5) Freeway – The Santa Ana (I-5) freeway runs in a northwest- southeast orientation through the City of Anaheim. The I-5 freeway was Orange County’s first true freeway, and it continues to serve interstate and regional travel needs to major destinations within the City, including Angel Stadium, the Anaheim Resort area, and Downtown Anaheim. Within the City, the I-5 freeway features four to five mixed flow lanes and HOV lanes in each direction and a full HOV interchange on the Gene Autry Way overpass. Orange (SR-57) Freeway – The Orange (SR-57) freeway runs in a north-south direction, with its southern terminus at the I-5 and Garden Grove (SR-22) freeways, just south of the Anaheim city limits. The SR-57 freeway provides regional access to northern Orange County and eastern Los Angeles County. The SR-57 freeway features five mixed flow lanes and one high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lane in each direction through Anaheim. Artisan Court – Artisan Court is classified as a Connector Street, requiring one through lane in each direction, undivided, with an ultimate right of way range of 46 feet to 62 feet, depending on whether optional street parking is provided (see Figure 7). According to City records, adjacent the Project site, the existing half right of way of Artisan Court from the centerline to the northerly right of way line is 28 feet (reducing to 23 feet on the westerly end), with a varying centerline to northerly face- of-curb dimension (13 feet on the west end, 8 feet in the center, 20 feet on the east end at the intersection with State College Boulevard).F Union Street – Similar in character and design to Artisan Court, the future Union Street, between Gene Autry Way and the south property limit, is designated to be constructed to Connector Street standards, with one through lane in each direction, undivided, with an ultimate right of way range of 46 feet to 62 feet, depending on whether optional street parking is provided (see Figure 7). It should be noted that Union Street is essential to providing access and circulation for the proposed Project, and will, thus, be constructed from Gene Autry Way to the south property limit and signalized at the intersection of Union Street and Gene Autry Way as part of mandatory street improvements associated with the proposed Project. F Plan No. 26041, Artisan Court, from State College Boulevard to 627 feet W’LY, City of Anaheim, July 2009. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -14- Figure 7 – Connector Street StandardG Description of Study Intersections The fifteen study intersections and two future intersections are briefly described below, followed by aerial views of each study intersection (see Figures 8 through 20). It should be noted that current aerial views of Katella Avenue and I-5 SB Ramps/Manchester Avenue (Study Intersection 1) and Katella Avenue and I-5 NB Ramps/Anaheim Way (Study Intersection 2) were not available as of the date of this report and are therefore excluded. 1) Katella Avenue & I-5 SB Ramps/Manchester Avenue – The intersection of Katella Avenue and the southbound I-5 freeway off ramp/Manchester Avenue is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for five phases of traffic movement. The eastbound approach leg features three through lanes, a separate right turn only lane, and a raised median island (no left turns permitted). The westbound approach leg features four through lanes and dual left turn lanes. The southbound approach leg features two through lanes, a separate right turn only lane and two left turn lanes. The southbound I-5 off ramp leg (northbound approach to intersection) features a separate right turn only lane, an optional left turn/right turn lane, and a left turn only lane. Crosswalks are marked across the southbound off ramp leg, eastbound approach leg, and the southbound approach leg of the intersection. G The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, Public Realm Landscape and Identity Program, City of Anaheim, October 2014. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -15- 2) Katella Avenue & I-5 NB Ramps/Anaheim Way – The intersection of Katella Avenue and the northbound I-5 freeway off ramp/Anaheim Way is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for three phases of traffic movement. The eastbound approach leg features four through lanes and dual left turn lanes, with a raised median island. The westbound approach leg has three through lanes, a right turn/optional through lane, and a separate right turn lane at Anaheim Way. The northbound off ramp/Anaheim Way leg has two through lanes, an optional through/right turn lane, an optional left turn/through lane, and an exclusive left turn only lane. Crosswalks are marked across all legs of the intersection except the eastbound approach leg. 3) Katella Avenue & Lewis Street – The intersection of Katella Avenue and Lewis Street is signalized for five phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features one through lane (which is shared for right turns) and a left turn pocket. The southbound approach leg has one through lane, a separate right turn lane and a left turn pocket. The eastbound approach leg has three through lanes and a left turn pocket, with a raised median island. The westbound approach leg has three through lanes, a separate right turn lane and a left turn pocket. Crosswalks are marked across the northbound, southbound and westbound approach legs. 4) Katella Avenue & State College Boulevard – The intersection of Katella Avenue and State College Boulevard is signalized for eight phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features three through lanes and dual left turn lanes. The southbound approach leg has three through lanes, dual left turn lanes, and a separate right turn lane. The eastbound approach leg has three through lanes, one through/right turn lane, one separate right turn lane, and dual left turn lanes. The westbound approach leg has three through lanes, a right turn lane, and dual left turn lanes. Crosswalks are marked across all four legs of the intersection. 5) Katella Avenue & Stadium Crossing – The intersection of Katella Avenue and Stadium Crossing is signalized for eight phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features three through lanes, a separate right turn lane, and dual left turn lanes. The southbound approach leg has three through lanes, a separate right turn lane, and dual left turn lanes. The eastbound approach leg has three through lanes, an optional through/right turn lane, a separate right turn lane, and a left turn pocket. The westbound approach leg has three through lanes, a separate right turn lane, and dual left turn lanes. Crosswalks are marked across all four legs of the intersection. 6) Katella Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps – The intersection of Katella Avenue and the southbound SR-57 freeway on/off ramps is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for two phases of traffic movement. The southbound SR-57 freeway off ramp approach leg features a right turn lane, a right turn/left turn lane, and a left turn lane. The westbound approach leg has three through lanes and a channelized right turn lane leading directly onto the southbound SR-57 freeway ramp prior to the intersection, and a raised median island. The eastbound approach leg has three Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -16- through lanes and a channelized right turn lane leading directly onto the southbound SR-57 freeway ramp prior to the intersection, and a raised median island. Eastbound and westbound traffic on Katella Avenue turning onto the southbound SR-57 freeway on ramps are not affected by the intersection operations unless heavy congestion impedes access to the on ramps. Pedestrian crossings of this intersection are restricted, and a crosswalk is marked across the southbound off ramp leg of the intersection only. 7) Katella Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps – The intersection of Katella Avenue and the northbound SR-57 freeway on/off ramps is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for four phases of traffic movement. The northbound SR-57 freeway off ramp approach leg features a right turn lane, an optional right turn/left turn lane, and a separate left turn lane. The westbound Katella Avenue approach leg has three through lanes and one right turn only lane (controlled by the traffic signal) onto the northbound SR-57 just west of the intersection. The eastbound approach leg has five through lanes, of which two lanes (i.e. No. 1 lane and No. 2 lane) become dual left turn lanes just east of the intersection at Douglass Road, and a channelized right turn lane leading directly onto the northbound SR-57 freeway ramp before the intersection, with a raised median island. Eastbound and westbound traffic on Katella Avenue turning onto the northbound SR-57 freeway on ramps are not affected by the intersection operations unless heavy congestion impedes access to the on ramps. Pedestrian crossings of this intersection are restricted, and a crosswalk is marked across the northbound off ramp leg of the intersection only. 8) State College Boulevard & Gateway – The intersection of State College Boulevard and Gateway is signalized for three phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features three through lanes. The southbound approach leg has three through lanes and dual left turn lanes. The westbound approach leg has a left turn lane and a right turn lane, with a raised median island. Crosswalks are marked across the south and east legs of the intersection. 9) State College Boulevard & Gene Autry Way – The intersection of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way is signalized for three phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features three through lanes and dual left turn lanes. The eastbound approach leg has one through lane, a through/optional left turn lane and a left turn pocket. The westbound approach leg has two through lanes for traffic exiting Angel Stadium. During events at the stadium, manual traffic controls are employed to designate temporary additional lanes into and out of the parking lot and onto Gene Autry Way, as needs arise. Crosswalks are marked across all legs of the intersection. 10) State College Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue – The intersection of State College Boulevard and Orangewood Avenue is signalized for eight phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features four through lanes and dual left turn lanes. The southbound approach leg has four through lanes and dual left turn lanes. The eastbound approach leg has three through lanes and dual left turn lanes. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -17- The westbound approach leg has three through lanes, dual left turn lanes, and a raised median island. Crosswalks are marked across all legs of the intersection. 11) Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps – The intersection of Orangewood Avenue and the southbound SR-57 freeway on/off ramps is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for three phases of traffic movement. The southbound SR-57 freeway off ramp approach leg has a right turn lane, an optional right turn/left turn lane, and a separate left turn lane. The eastbound approach leg has two through lanes and a separate right turn lane. The westbound approach leg has two through lanes and a left turn lane pocket, with a raised median. Crosswalks are marked across both the southbound off ramp and on ramp legs of the intersection. 12) Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps – The intersection of Orangewood Avenue and the northbound SR-57 freeway on/off ramps is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for two phases of traffic movement. The northbound SR- 57 freeway off ramp approach leg features a right turn lane, an optional right turn/left turn lane, and a left turn lane. The westbound approach leg has two through lanes and one right turn only lane (controlled by the traffic signal) onto the northbound SR- 57 freeway just west of the intersection, and a raised median island. The eastbound approach leg has two through lanes, and two channelized right turn lanes leading directly onto the northbound SR-57 freeway ramp before the signalized intersection, and a raised median island. Eastbound traffic on Orangewood Avenue turning right onto the northbound SR-57 freeway on ramp is not affected by intersection operations unless heavy congestion impedes access to the on ramps. Pedestrian crossings of this intersection are restricted, and a crosswalk is marked across the northbound off ramp leg of the intersection only. 13) The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 NB Ramps – The intersection of The City Drive/State College Boulevard and the northbound I-5 freeway ramps is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for four phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features four through lanes, two left turn pockets, and a channelized right turn lane leading directly onto the northbound I-5 before the intersection, and a raised median island. The southbound approach leg has four through lanes, a left turn pocket, a separate right turn lane, and a raised median island. The northbound off ramp leg (westbound approach to intersection) has a through lane, an optional left turn/through lane, a left turn pocket, and two right turn lanes. Crosswalks are marked across both the northbound off ramp leg and northbound Anaheim Way leg of the intersection. 14) The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramps – The intersection of The City Drive/State College Boulevard and the southbound I-5 Freeway off ramp is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for two phases of traffic movement. The northbound approach leg features four through lanes and an optional right turn/through lane, with a raised median island. The southbound approach leg has four through lanes, a separate right turn only lane onto the southbound freeway ramp, and a raised median island. The southbound off ramp leg Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -18- (eastbound approach to intersection) has two right turn lanes, an optional left turn/through lane, and a left turn lane. Pedestrian crossings of this intersection are restricted, and a crosswalk is marked across the southbound off ramp leg of the intersection only. 15) Gene Autry Way & I-5 HOV Ramps – The intersection of Gene Autry Way and the I-5 high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) northbound and southbound on/off ramps is under the jurisdiction of Caltrans, and is signalized for six phases of traffic movement. The northbound HOV off ramp leg features an optional left turn/right turn lane and a separate right turn lane. The southbound HOV off ramp leg has two left turn lanes and a separate right turn lane. The westbound approach leg has a left turn lane, two through lanes, and an optional through/right turn lane. The eastbound approach leg has a left turn lane, two through lanes, and an optional through/right turn lane. Crosswalks are marked across the northbound off ramp leg and southbound off ramp leg of the intersection. State College Boulevard & Artisan Court – Although not identified as one of the study intersections, due to the fact that there is almost no traffic currently on Artisan Court, the intersection of State College Boulevard and Artisan Court is currently signalized and is anticipated to provide future access to the proposed Project at a later date. Gene Autry Way & Union Street – Although not identified as one of the study intersections, due to the fact that it does not currently exist, the intersection of Gene Autry Way and Union Street will serve as one of two main entrance intersections for the proposed Project. This intersection will be constructed as part of the mandated Project street improvements. Signalization costs will be shared with other ongoing developments in the area. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -19- Figure 8 – Lewis Street & Katella Avenue Figure 9 – State College Boulevard & Katella Avenue Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -20- Figure 10 – Katella Avenue & Stadium Crossing Figure 11 – Katella Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -21- Figure 12 – Katella Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps Figure 13 – State College Boulevard & Gateway Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -22- Figure 14 – State College Boulevard & Gene Autry Way Figure 15 – State College Boulevard & Orangewood Avenue Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -23- Figure 16 – Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 SB Ramps Figure 17 – Orangewood Avenue & SR-57 NB Ramps Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -24- Figure 18 – The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 NB Ramps Figure 19 – The City Drive/State College Boulevard & I-5 SB Ramps Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -25- Figure 20 – Gene Autry Way & I-5 HOV Ramps Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -26- The current lane configurations of the approach legs to the fifteen study intersection are depicted in Figure 21. Figure 21 – Intersection Lane Configurations III. STUDY TERMINOLOGY The following are definitions of some of the terminology used throughout this report. A.M. and P.M. Peak Hours The A.M and P.M. peak hours refer to the morning and late afternoon times of the day during which the greatest number of motor vehicles are carried on a given roadway segment or intersection. Typically, the significant peak hours of traffic on an average weekday occur during the morning commute, between 7:00 and 9:00 A.M., and during the late afternoon commute, between 4:00 and 6:00 P.M. These hours do not necessarily correspond to the peak hour of trip generation, which, for commercial uses, can occur mid-day and on weekends. For the subject study, A.M. and P.M. peak hour turn movement traffic counts were collected in the month of September 2015 for each study intersection on either a Tuesday or Wednesday. These intersection turn movement counts were independently collected for KHR CARPOOL ONLY CHAPMAN ORANGEWOOD GENE AUTRY WAY ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D . A N A H E I M W A Y M A N C H E S T E R HA S T E R GATEWAY LE W I S S T R E E T LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTION 57 PROJECT 5 HOWELL STADIUM NO TURN ON RED KATELLA AVENUE A V E N U E RAMP A R T STR E E T AVENUE DU P O N T DR I V E CROSSING AVENUE SITE 1. 2. 3. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10.13. 14. 11. 12. ST R E E T AVENUE 15. 9. ** ** ** * *** RAMPSHOV ARTISAN CT. UN I O N ST . *** *** **** ******* FREE FLOW LANE*** ** * THRU TO NEXT INTERSECTION**** ******** ST A D I U M EN T R A N C E ON/OFFRAMPS ON/OFFRAMPS ON OFF RAMP OFF RAMP OFF RAMP OFF RAMP ON RAMP OFF RAMP ON RAMP OFF R A M P ON RA M P OFF R A M P ON R A M P ON/OFF RAMP ANGELSTADIUMOFANAHEIM ANAHEIM REGIONALTRANSPORTATIONINTERMODAL CENTER HONDACENTER ON RAMP RAMP 4. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -27- Associates by National Data & Surveying Services (NDS), Santa Ana, California. The summary intersection traffic count results can be found in the Appendix section of this report. Average Daily Traffic The average daily traffic (ADT) volume is an estimate of the number of motor vehicles carried on a given roadway segment over a 24-hour period of time. The estimate of ADT is often based on one or more days of actual traffic counts taken by a mechanical device designed specifically for counting traffic on streets. ADT volumes are typically expressed as the total number of vehicles for both directions of travel, but may be separated by direction when such information is useful, as was done for this traffic analysis. ADT volumes do not typically change in dramatic fashion from month to month or year to year, unless the area in question is undergoing rapid growth and development or seasonal variations are significant. For the subject study, directional roadway segment traffic counts were continuously collected in the month of September 2015 over 48 consecutive hours – on a Tuesday, September 23rd through Wednesday, September 24th. These daily traffic counts were also independently collected for KHR Associates by NDS. The summary ADT count results can be found in the Appendix section of this report. Capacity The capacity of a roadway segment or intersection is the maximum rate of vehicular traffic flow under prevailing traffic, physical design, and operational conditions. Factors affecting capacity include the type and frequency of traffic controls; the operational characteristics of traffic signals (if present); lane widths; horizontal and vertical grades; horizontal and vertical clearances from obstructions; the amount of truck and/or bus traffic; the availability of on-street parking and the rate of parking turnover; restrictions on mid-property access; and the volume of turn movements at adjacent intersections and driveways. Capacity is most commonly defined for hourly periods of time, and most analyses rely on peak 15-minute count increments to establish capacity values. It is useful to define capacity as the maximum volume of traffic that an intersection may be expected to carry, under the least desirable conditions (e.g., with heavy congestion during the peak hours). For planning purposes, roadway segments are also assigned “capacities” based on the number of travel lanes; width of the roadway; access restrictions; medians; parkway and intersection design; and adjacent land uses. 24-hour roadway segment capacities are not indicative of the maximum number of vehicles that can be physically carried - rather, such capacities suggest the maximum number of vehicles that should be allowed under ideal conditions given the characteristics of the roadway and community preferences. These capacity values vary somewhat from jurisdiction to jurisdiction. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -28- Hourly capacities for roadways are typically stated in vehicles per hour per lane (VPHPL). On multi-lane arterials and freeways, unimpeded capacity is 2,000 VPHPL. On two-lane roadways, with directional traffic split 50%/50%, the total capacity for both directions combined is 2,800 vehicles per hour (VPH). Lane capacities on surface streets vary from 1,500 VPH to 1,800 VPH, depending on ambient and operational conditions, including the types of adjacent land uses, number and location of driveways, intersection signal operations, and other factors. Level of Service The level of service (LOS) of a roadway segment or an intersection is a qualitatively defined measure of prevailing traffic, design, and operational conditions. The LOS, denoted alphabetically from "A" to "F," best to worst, is an evaluation of the degree of congestion, roadway design constraints, delay, accident potential, and driver discomfort experienced during a given period of time - typically during the peak hour or on a daily basis. While LOS “A” is the most desirable operational state for a roadway segment or intersection, LOS “C” is considered a benchmark for arterial streets segments, and LOS “D” is an accepted condition for intersections, per the City of Anaheim’s Traffic and Transportation Division. The LOS may be quantitatively calculated by a number of methods that generally compare traffic volumes with the physical and operational capacity of a roadway section or intersection to carry traffic demands placed upon it. For roadway segments and intersections, the volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratio is indicative of LOS. Traffic volumes are measured by conducting actual counts over prescribed periods of time. Capacity figures are established by the governing jurisdiction, and often based on localized conditions. Intersection LOS can also be determined using computer software to account for various influencing factors such as lane configurations, traffic signal timing (for signalized intersections), and vehicle delays. Within the City of Anaheim’s Circulation Element of the General Plan, levels of service definitions are provided.H Table II lists the typical service volumes corresponding to the number of lanes and median type. It should be noted that the LOS for roadway segments are generally used for planning purposes only, and do not indicate true operational LOS during peak hours. H Circulation Element of the City of Anaheim General Plan, May 2004. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -29- TABLE II – LEVELS OF SERVICE FOR ROADWAY CLASSIFICATIONS Traffic Lane Levels of Service Configuration A B C D E F 8 (divided) 45,000 52,500 60,000 67,500 75,000 >75,000 6 (divided) 33,900 39,400 45,000 50,600 56,300 >56,300 4 (divided) 22,500 26,300 30,000 33,800 37,500 >37,500 4 (undivided) 15,000 17,500 20,000 22,500 25,000 >25,000 2 (undivided) 7,500 8,800 10,000 11,300 12,500 >12,500 Source: City of Anaheim General Plan, Circulation Element Various methods of computing intersection LOS are used, including the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) and HCS+ software, based on the 2010 Highway Capacity Manual (HCM).I Table III provides City of Anaheim LOS definitions for signalized intersections at corresponding volume-to-capacity (V/C) ratios. TABLE III - SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS & V/C RATIOS LOS V/C Ratio Definitions A 0.0 - 0.60 There are no signal cycles that are fully loaded, and few are close to loaded. No approach phase is fully utilized by traffic and no vehicle waits longer than one red indication. Typically, the approach appears open; turn movements are easily made; and nearly all drivers operate unimpeded. B 0.61 - 0.70 Stable operation is maintained. An occasional approach phase is fully utilized and a substantial number are approaching full use. Many drivers begin to feel somewhat restricted within groups of vehicles. C 0.71 - 0.80 Stable operation continues. Full signal cycle loading is still intermittent, but more frequent. Occasionally, drivers may have to wait through more than one red signal indication, and backups may develop behind turning vehicles. D 0.81 - 0.90 Encompasses a zone of increasing restriction approaching instability. Delays to approaching vehicles may be substantial during short peaks within the peak period, but enough cycles with lower demand occur to periodic clearance of developing queues, thus preventing excessive backups. E 0.91 - 1.00 Represents the most vehicles that any particular intersection approach can accommodate. At capacity (V/C = 1.00), there may be long queues of vehicles waiting upstream of the intersection and delays may be great. F >1.00 Represents jammed conditions. Backups from locations downstream or on the cross street may restrict or prevent movement of vehicles out of the approach under consideration; hence, volumes carried are not predictable. V/C values are highly variable, because full utilization of the approach may be prevented by external conditions. Source: City of Anaheim General Plan, Circulation Element, May 2004 I HCS+, Release 6.50, McTrans Center, University of Florida, 2010. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -30- Table IV provides criteria for signalized and unsignalized intersections, based on HCM and Caltrans methodologies for determining LOS. These LOS are used to approximate true operating conditions, and are normally calculated for intersections during morning and late afternoon peak hours. Based on the Caltrans traffic impact study guidelines, Caltrans endeavors to maintain a target LOS at the transition between LOS “C” and LOS “D” on State highway facilities. TABLE IV – UNSIGNALIZED & SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION LOS CRITERIA Intersection Delay (in Seconds) Level of Service Unsignalized Intersection Signalized Intersection A ≤ 10.0 ≤ 10.0 B > 10.0 and ≤ 15.0 > 10.0 and ≤ 20.0 C > 15.0 and ≤ 25.0 > 20.0 and ≤ 35.0 D > 25.0 and ≤ 35.0 > 35.0 and ≤ 55.0 E > 35.0 and ≤ 50.0 > 55.0 and ≤ 80.0 F > 50.0 > 80.0 Source: Highway Capacity Manual, HCM 2010 & Caltrans Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, December 2010. Significant Transportation Impact Although the methodologies for calculating LOS are well-established and fairly consistent, determining whether or not a “significant transportation impact” or intersection traffic impact occurs is not as easy to quantify. Local jurisdictions have varying interpretations of what constitutes a significant impact. Some agencies base significant impacts on the number of seconds added to average intersection delay per vehicle or the number of additional vehicles added to a critical intersection turn movement. In the case of the City of Anaheim, significant transportation impacts are determined on the basis of increase in the volume-to-capacity ratio under the City of Anaheim methodology (see Table V). TABLE V - SIGNIFICANT TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FOR PROJECT-RELATED INCREASE IN V/C Level of Service V/C Ratio Project-Related Increase in V/C C > 0.70 – 0.80 Equal to or greater than 0.05 D > 0.80 – 0.90 Equal to or greater than 0.03 E, F > 0.90 Equal to or greater than 0.01 SOURCE: Amendment to the Platinum Triangle MLUP SEIR, City of Anaheim, October 2007 Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -31- Trip Ends Traffic generated by different types of development and land use is typically expressed in terms of trip ends. A trip end (or trip) is the directional movement of a single motor vehicle either to or from a development site. When a vehicle enters a development site, one trip end is generated. When a vehicle exits a development site, one trip end is generated. Therefore, each vehicle entering and exiting a development site generates two trip ends. For analysis purposes, the number of trip ends generated over a given time period is the total of all vehicles entering plus all vehicles exiting the site during that time period. Trip ends generated to a development site are designated inbound trips and trip ends generated from a development site are designated outbound trips. Trip Generation Trip generation refers to the number of trip ends generated by a given development or land use over a specified period of time - usually per day and during morning and late afternoon peak hours of traffic demand. Attempts to quantify the trip making propensities of given land uses and types of development have led to the formulation of trip generation rates. In simplified travel demand forecasting, trip ends are often estimated by applying these empirically-determined trip generation rates. Rates for a variety of land uses, including residential developments, may be found in technical reference documents such as the Institute of Transportation Engineers' (ITE) Trip Generation manual.J The data found in these documents typically include average weekday and peak hour rates that correspond with the peak periods of commuter traffic. A wide assortment of land uses, including multi-family residential, commercial office, and lodging are covered. For multi-family residential development, the independent variable is typically the number of dwelling units, and trip generation is stated in terms of trip ends per dwelling unit. For commercial retail uses, the independent variable is typically the gross floor area (in square feet), and trip generation is stated in terms of trip ends per 1,000 square feet of gross floor area. Trip Reduction In some instances trip making interactions between uses within a given project site allow for an overall reduction in the estimate of trip generation by the site. Although office, hotel, and residential uses suggest that some internal trips could occur, there is insufficient empirical data to support a significant trip reduction based solely on the mixed-uses. Therefore, for analysis purposes, no reduction is taken for internal trips. The convenient and price-sensitive availability of transit service to and from a given project site can also reduce private vehicle trips. The Project will be in close proximity J Trip Generation, 9th Edition, Volume 3 of 3, Institute of Transportation Engineers Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -32- to a variety of transit alternatives, including the recently open ARTIC multi-modal transportation center. In addition, the proliferation of private taxi services such as Uber and Lyft are having an impact on how small groups of people routinely travel to certain destinations and venues. Trip Distribution/Trip Assignment In addition to trip generation, travel demand forecasting also includes trip distribution and trip assignment. Trip distribution signifies by general direction (i.e., east, west, north, and south) the percentage of all traffic generated to and from a given project site. Trip assignment identifies the particular routes used by traffic generated to and from a given project site. These steps are often combined for small projects and/or areas of analysis. Trip distribution/trip assignment is used to predict the patterns of traffic generated by a given project site, taking into consideration several factors, including: observations of existing traffic patterns; existing land use and proposed land use; surrounding land uses; volumes of traffic on streets and highways; the traffic carrying capacity of these streets and highways; and site access (e.g., left turn) restrictions. Ambient Growth In order to effectively estimate traffic conditions at the Project target year of 2018, an ambient growth factor was included in the evaluations per the coordination with the City of Anaheim. Volumes recorded in 2015 for study roadways and intersections were multiplied by one percent per year for each of the three years leading to 2018 conditions. IV. TRIP GENERATION Trip generation for the proposed Project can be estimated by applying known trip generation rates for the various proposed uses. For urban settings such as the Platinum Triangle area, trip generation is calculated for an average weekday (24 hour period, and for the morning and afternoon peak hours of weekday commute (typically 7:00 to 9:00 A.M. and 4:00 to 6:00 P.M.) on streets serving a given project). For the apartment and commercial uses proposed as land use components of Project, the ITE Trip Generation manual provides the following definitions: Land Use Code 220 – Apartment “Apartments” are described as rental dwelling units that are located within the same building with at least three other dwelling units.” Also, “the peak hour of the generator typically coincides with the peak hour of the adjacent street traffic.”K K Trip Generation, Volume 2 of 3, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012 Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -33- Land Use Code 814 – Specialty Retail “Specialty retail centers” are generally described as small strip-type shopping centers that contain a variety of retail shops, such as real estate offices, florists and small restaurants.L Live/Work The “live/work” component of the Project, is not currently defined in the ITE Trip Generation manual. However, the use can be interpreted to include an assortment of uses where a resident can operate an office-type business within the dwelling unit by creating a definable separation of space (e.g., residence portion and a separate office). This type of unit can also be converted to exclusively residential use. Due to the lack of an authoritative source for live/work space trip generation, the TIS assumes a “worst case” condition by applying ITE’s Specialty Retail land use for the purposes of analyzing trip generation and associated traffic impacts. Based on the above definitions, a trip generation table was formulated showing each land use category; size (in either units for apartments or 1,000 square feet for commercial and live/work); the applicable trip generation rates; and the inbound, outbound, and total daily and A.M. and P.M. peak hour trips generated by the proposed Project. The results are summarized in Table VI. As indicated in Table VI, the proposed Project is estimated to generate a total of 8,114 daily trip ends, including 730 trip ends (238 inbound and 492 outbound) and 822 trip ends (496 inbound and 326 outbound), during the A.M. and P.M. peak hours, respectively. L Trip Generation, Volume 3 of 3, 9th Edition, Institute of Transportation Engineers, 2012 Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -34- TABLE VI - SUMMARY OF JEFFERSON STADIUM PARK TRIP GENERATION AVERAGE DAILY TRIPS ON A WEEKDAY Inbound/ Inbound Outbound Total Trip Land Use Category (Code)1 Size2 Trip Rate3 Outbound3 Trip Ends4 Trip Ends4 Ends4 Apartments (220) 1,079 DU 6.72/DU 50%/50% 3,626 3,626 7,252 Specialty Retail (814) 9,800 SF 44.32/1,000 SF 50%/50% 218 218 436 Live/Work5 (814) 9,600 SF 44.32/1,000 SF 50%/50% 213 213 426 Total Daily Trips Generated During Average Weekday 4,057 4,057 8,114 WEEKDAY A.M. PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC Inbound/ Inbound Outbound Total Trip Land Use Category (Code)1 Size2 Trip Rate3 Outbound3 Trip Ends4 Trip Ends4 Ends4 Apartments (220) 1,079 DU 0.55/DU 29%/71% 173 422 595 Specialty Retail (814) 9,800 SF 6.84/1,000 SF 48%/52% 33 35 68 Live/Work 5 (814) 9,600 SF 6.84/1,000 SF 48%/52% 32 35 67 Total Trips Generated During A.M. Peak Hour 238 492 730 WEEKDAY P.M. PEAK HOUR OF ADJACENT STREET TRAFFIC Inbound/ Inbound Outbound Total Trip Land Use Category (Code)1 Size2 Trip Rate3 Outbound3 Trip Ends4 Trip Ends4 Ends4 Apartments (220) 1,079 DU 0.67/DU 61%/39% 441 282 723 Specialty Retail (814) 9,800 SF 5.02/1,000 SF 56%/44% 28 22 50 Live/Work 5 (814) 9,600 SF 5.02/1,000 SF 56%/44% 27 22 49 Total Trips Generated During P.M. Peak Hour 496 326 822 Notes: 1 - Land Use Code Per Trip Generation Manual, 9th Ed., Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2 - DU = Dwelling Units; SF= Square Feet of Gross Floor Area 3 - Trip Generation Rate & Percentage of Inbound/Outbound Trips Per Trip Generation Manual, 9th Ed., Institute of Transportation Engineers 4 - All Trip Ends Rounded to Nearest Whole Unit 5 - “Live/Work” Calculated As Specialty Retail Due to Lack of Specific Land Use Category Reference. V. TRIP DISTRIBUTION/TRIP ASSIGNMENTS Trip distribution and trip assignments for the proposed Project were formulated with input from the City’s Traffic and Transportation Division. Trip Distribution Based on known trip making propensities and travel routes taken by those living and working within the Platinum Triangle, trip distribution assumptions are depicted in Figure 22 for inbound and outbound trips generated by the proposed Project. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -35- CHAPMAN GENE AUTRY WAY ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D . A N A H E I M W A Y M A N C H E S T E R GATEWAY ANGEL LE W I S S T R E E T 57 PROJECT 5 HOWELL SPORTS KATELLA AVENUE A V E N U E RAMP A R T STR E E T AVENUE DU P O N T DR I V E TOWN SITE HA S T E R S T R E E T ORANGEWOOD AVENUE STADIUM ARTISAN CT. UN I O N ST . OFANAHEIM ANAHEIM REGIONALTRANSPORTATION INTERMODAL CENTER HONDA CENTER 50 % 5 % 10% 5%25% 25% LEGEND INBOUND [DAILY TRIPS] OUTBOUND [DAILY TRIPS] 5% 5% 50 % 20% 20% 10 % 5% 5% 5% 5% 25% 25% 5% 5% 20% 20% 15 % 15 % 5% 5% 30 % 30 % 5% 5% 10% 10% 5% 5% 1 0 % 10% AVENUE 1 0 % 10% 1 0 % 1 0 % Figure 22 – Trip Distribution Assumptions Trip Assignments Based on the trip distribution assumptions illustrated in Figure 22, trip assignments were made. These trip assignments were based on physical and operational constraints affecting roadways and intersections; direction (i.e., inbound or outbound) and time of day (i.e., A.M. or P.M. peak hour) of travel; and traffic control devices that regulate the flow of traffic on the streets and highways network servicing the Project site. Inbound and outbound trips generated by the proposed Project during the daily, and A.M. and P.M. peak hours of weekday commute were assigned to various roadway segments and study intersections based on trip distribution percentages in each direction from the Project site. These inbound and outbound trip assignments during daily, and A.M. and P.M. peak hours are depicted in Figure 23. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -36- AM/PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS CHAPMAN AUTRY ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D . A N A H E I M W A Y M A N C H E S T E R HA S T E R S T R E E T GATEWAY ANGEL LE W I S S T R E E T LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTION 57 5 HOWELL SPORTS KATELLA AVENUE A V E N U E RAMP A R T STR E E T AVENUE DU P O N T DR I V E TOWN AVENUE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 13. 14. 11. 12. STADIUM 15. 9. RAMPSHOV ARTISAN CT. UN I O N S T . OFANAHEIM ANAHEIM REGIONALTRANSPORTATIONINTERMODAL CENTER HONDACENTER 8364 28211034 3 67 4 20 35 20 40 79 52 6 13 17 37 3 6 7 4 29 50 10056 XXXXXX 3074 2821 3074 11185 3074 11 1 85 25 16 12 25 2950 23 6 15 7 71 14 9 10 0 56 2510 9 15 2 5 1 6 7540 475030 5 8 14 30 15102520 715 7 15 105 1019 1430 23 50 39 22 40 30 79 52 6 13 24 16 55 36 25162416 71 14 9 236157 NEW PROJECT INTERSECTION GENE WAY 17. 60124 98 65 118248 14 8 98 INTERSECTIONNEW [2,028] DAILY TRIPS[XXX] [4 0 6 ] [1,62 3 ] [324] [146][728] AVENUE [489] ORANGEWOOD [3 6 5 ] [489] [1 , 2 1 7 ] [4 , 0 5 7 ] [2 , 4 3 4 ] [1,623] [406] [81 1 ] [4 2 6 ] [2 9 1 ] [ 6 5 0 ] [64 9 ] 158104 47 99 60124 48100 4933 55 [81 1 ] [2 9 1 ] [4 2 6 ] Figure 23 – Daily and Peak Hour Project-Only Trip Assignments Existing Traffic – Year 2015 Conditions Existing traffic at study roadway segments and intersections were documented by directional 24-hour (i.e., ADT) and peak hour (i.e., A.M. and P.M peak hours of weekday commute) turn movement counts. The results are illustrated in Figure 24. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -37- AM/PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS CHAPMAN AUTRY ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D . A N A H E I M W A Y M A N C H E S T E R HA S T E R S T R E E T GATEWAY ANGEL LE W I S S T R E E T LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTION 5 HOWELL SPORTS KATELLA AVENUE A V E N U E RAMP A R T STR E E T AVENUE DU P O N T DR I V E TOWN AVENUE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 13. 14. 11. 12. STADIUM 15. 9. RAMPSHOV ARTISAN CT. UN I O N S T . OFANAHEIM ANAHEIM REGIONALTRANSPORTATIONINTERMODAL CENTER HONDACENTER 8681,685796725 1 3 1 3 1,4 6 5 1,4 2 2 62 4 1,0 2 4 292 256 7 7 2 5 860 1,476 1,180 1,046 XXX XXX 1,173910 8771,735 1,113 858 6501,478 152124 11 4 23 2 63 3 88 7 1, 2 1 3 93 1 419365 94 4 1, 3 2 7 1, 6 6 0 1,4 0 3 22 3 30 6 840 755 9951,124 1,059 1,067 8831,662382479 36 4 20 4 4218991,379868240119 5721,261 78 41 1,139690 237192 56134 58 7 93 8 22 5 21 3 21 6 14 3 1, 1 3 8 1, 0 1 3 80 4 1,5 9 7 1,3 3 4 1,1 4 5 23 0 39 4 1468 1521 1, 4 9 8 1, 3 2 8 15 3 17 4 190117 NEW PROJECT INTERSECTION GENE WAY [31,172] DAILY TRIPS[XXX] [2 6 , 7 3 6 ] [32,3 2 1 ] AVENUE ORANGEWOOD [23,232] [2 3 , 4 4 5 ] [2 7 , 0 5 7 ] [4,210] 4 1 6 1 , 3 3 1 2 7 8 8 0 3 7 8 5 9 8 7999 65201 7044349143 323 113 41 3 21 6 2034 24 26 78 96 15 38 104 35 11 7 16 9 216167846674 5291,211 3573 39 9 50 8 57 5 21 3 48 4 15 5 34 9 53 1 1,3225707139 4521,154 10 5 88 24 0 15 0 155289 7 1 0 1 4 6 0 6814717665 1617 2411 73 14 6 1410 154334 428491 3545 5868 13 3 97 115312 32 8114 12156 0 2 5 0 1 1 9 7 1 1 1 2 95 51 2323 9 19 13870 0 2 3 7 6 2 7 17 3 30 98 26 1 10 09 12 211 30 55 85 1 1,2 2 9 0 6 02 217403 25 20 24 0 20 4 167311 449385 46 24 1 15 6 43 6 23 16 41 14 125 963 8556 10 13 2374 221 170525 328 25 42 45 6 23 7 15 6 17 0 258756334411 Figure 24 – Existing Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Counts - Year 2015 Conditions Existing + Project Traffic – Year 2015 Conditions Adding Project traffic (i.e., trip assignments) to existing traffic at study roadway segments and intersections during the A.M. and P.M peak hours of weekday commute are illustrated in Figure 25. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -38- AM/PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS CHAPMAN AUTRY ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D . A N A H E I M W A Y M A N C H E S T E R HA S T E R S T R E E T GATEWAY ANGEL LE W I S S T R E E T LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTION 57 5 HOWELL STADIUM KATELLA AVENUE A V E N U E RAMP A R T STR E E T AVENUE DU P O N T DR I V E CROSSING AVENUE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 13. 14. 11. 12. STADIUM 15. 9. RAMPSHOV ARTISAN CT. UN I O N S T . OFANAHEIM ANAHEIM REGIONALTRANSPORTATIONINTERMODAL CENTER HONDACENTER 8961,706806759 4 9 8 7 1,5 4 4 1,4 7 4 63 0 1,0 3 7 309 293 1 1 3 1 0 9 889 1,526 1,280 1,102 XXXXXX 1,203984 9601,799 1,143 932 7611,563 182198 22 5 31 7 65 8 90 3 1,2 2 5 95 6 448415 1, 1 8 0 1, 4 8 4 1,7 3 1 1, 5 5 2 32 3 36 2 865765 1,0041,139 1,1341,107 8871,669432509 36 9 21 2 4359291,394878265139 579 1,276 85 56 1,149695 247211 70 164 61 0 98 8 26 4 23 5 25 6 17 3 1,2 1 7 1,0 6 5 81 0 1,6 1 0 1,3 5 8 1,1 6 1 28 5 43 0 3984 3937 1,4 9 8 1,3 2 8 22 4 32 3 426274 NEW PROJECT INTERSECTION GENE WAY [33,200] DAILY TRIPS[XXX] [2 7 , 1 4 2 ] [33,9 4 4 ] AVENUE ORANGEWOOD [23,721] [24 , 6 6 2 ] [2 9 , 4 9 1 ] [5,833] 4 1 6 1 , 3 3 1 2 7 8 8 0 3 7 8 5 9 8 7999 93222 7044349143 323 113 41 3 21 6 2034 24 26 78 96 15 38 262139 11 7 16 9 216167846674 5291,211 3573 41 9 54 3 57 5 21 3 48 4 15 5 37 4 55 1 1,3225707139 4521,154 10 5 88 24 0 15 0 155289 71 0 1 4 6 0 117180224165 1617 2411 73 14 6 1410 154334 428 491 3545 5868 13 3 97 115312 32 8114 12156 0 2 5 0 1 1 9 71 1 1 2 95 51 2323 9 19 138 70 0 2 3 7 6 2 7 17 3 30 98 26 1 10 09 12 211 77 15 4 85 1 1,2 2 9 0 6 02 217403 24 0 20 4 167311 454390 46 24 1 15 6 43 6 23 16 41 14 125 963 8556 10 13 23 74 221 170525328 25 42 47 6 27 7 15 6 17 0 258756359427 Figure 25 – Existing+Project Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes – Year 2015 Conditions Committed and Proposed Developments There are a number of development projects within the Platinum Triangle area that are either in the design or advanced planning stages, or under construction that will generate varying amounts of traffic on the regional streets and highways network. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -39- Traffic generated by these development projects need to be taken into account when evaluating the proposed Project’s fair share responsibilities for traffic improvements. Although the timing of completion of each development will vary, for this study, a worst-case scenario was used by assuming build-out and occupancy of each development by the year 2018. Table VII contains a City-provided list of committed and proposed projects within the Platinum Triangle, along with their respective amounts of traffic estimated to be generated upon completion. The location of each of these projects is identified in Figure 26. TABLE VII - COMMITTED AND PROPOSED DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS AM Peak Hour2 PM Peak Hour2 Land Use Size Unit ADT2 In Out Total In Out Total 1. Wolff Company “Platinum Gateway” (915 E. Katella Avenue) - Apartments Trip Generation1 399 DU 2,681 64 156 219 163 104 267 2. Wolff Company “Platinum Vista” (1105 E. Katella Avenue) - Apartments Trip Generation1 386 DU 2,594 62 151 212 158 101 259 3. Urban Partners “Anaheim Apartment Communities” (1725 S. Auburn Way) - Apartments Trip Generation1 244 DU 1,640 39 95 134 100 64 163 4. TDI “Jefferson Platinum Triangle I & II” (1781 S. Campton Avenue & 1551 E. Wright Circle) - Apartments Trip Generation1 400 DU 2,688 64 156 220 163 105 268 5. Lennar “A-Town Metro” (1404 E. Katella Avenue) - Residential/Commercial Trip Generation1 1,746/50.000 DU/KSF 13,949 443 860 1,302 854 567 1,421 6. LNR “Platinum Stadium” (2025 E. Orangewood Avenue) - Apartments Trip Generation1 525 DU 3,528 84 205 289 215 137 351 7. Lyon-Integral Anaheim, LLC “Orangewood Apartments” (2211 E. Orangewood Avenue) - Apartments Trip Generation1 341 DU 2,292 54 133 188 139 89 228 8. The Irvine Company “Gateway Apartment Homes Phase II” (2020 & 2100 Orangewood Avenue) - Apartments Trip Generation1 395 DU 2,654 63 154 217 161 103 265 Total Trip Generation 32,026 872 1,910 2,782 1,954 1,270 3,223 Notes: DU: Dwelling Unit; KSF: Thousand Square Feet 1 Trip Generation Rate & Percentage of Inbound/Outbound Trips Per Trip Generation Manual, 9th Ed., Institute of Transportation Engineers. 2 All Trip Ends Rounded to Nearest Whole Unit. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -40- Figure 26 – Location of Committed and Proposed Development Projects Existing+Ambient+Cumulative Traffic – Year 2018 Conditions Adding ambient growth of 1% per year (for 3 years), and cumulative development traffic to existing traffic at study roadway segments and intersections during the A.M. and P.M peak hours of weekday commute are illustrated in Figure 27. Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+Project Traffic – Year 2018 Conditions Adding Project traffic to the existing traffic, ambient growth, and cumulative development traffic at study roadway segments and intersections during the A.M. and P.M peak hours of weekday commute are illustrated in Figure 28. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -41- AM/PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS CHAPMAN AUTRY ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D . A N A H E I M W A Y M A N C H E S T E R HA S T E R S T R E E T GATEWAY ANGEL LE W I S S T R E E T LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTION 57 5 HOWELL STADIUM KATELLA AVENUE A V E N U E RAMP A R T STR E E T AVENUE DU P O N T DR I V E CROSSING AVENUE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 13. 14. 11. 12. STADIUM 15. 9. RAMPSHOV ARTISAN CT. UN I O N S T . OFANAHEIM ANAHEIM REGIONALTRANSPORTATIONINTERMODAL CENTER HONDACENTER 1,1331,741929846 3 2 4 6 1,6 9 2 1,5 9 7 76 5 1,2 5 9 347 407 9 9 5 9 1,103 1,948 1,687 1,364 XXXXXX 1,3561,207 1,4362,128 1,3421,436 1,2291,881 324303 19 6 44 8 65 4 92 4 1,2 5 0 97 6 445418 1, 0 8 7 1, 6 0 1 1, 8 9 0 1,6 9 4 26 3 34 4 1,036835 1,1261,414 1,4331,271 9601,798566609 42 6 37 9 5031,1331,5891,020365215 609 1,363 12 9 18 5 1,224753 298201 82 246 69 8 1,1 1 9 26 6 23 8 27 4 24 6 1, 3 2 4 1, 1 3 3 88 6 1,7 1 4 1,4 8 8 1,2 3 2 33 1 48 6 4493 4545 1, 7 0 2 1, 5 3 6 17 9 24 5 231162 NEW PROJECT INTERSECTION 16. 11 1 1 0 0 00 GENE WAY 17. [41,431] DAILY TRIPS[XXX] [2 8 , 7 4 9 ] [38,7 4 5 ] AVENUE ORANGEWOOD [25,697] [3 0 , 8 7 3 ] [3 6 , 2 8 5 ] [7,838] 4 2 9 1 3 7 1 3 3 4 3 6 5 3 8 9 6 1 6 81102 94225 10259360147 33 3 113 42 6 22 3 2168 25 27 80 99 83 86 150 75 13 8 22 6 2561941,331967 7601,655 3675 53 7 69 4 59 2 21 9 49 9 16 0 38 6 71 7 1,38060612840 5641,209 13 5 91 32 2 34 9 296422 71 0 1 4 6 2 9716019381 2318 3311 75 15 0 1410 227372 441 506 3646 10 383 13 7 10 0 118321 32 8117 12161 0 2 5 2 1 2 3 8 4 1 3 7 121 69 2424 9 20 14272 0 2 3 7 6 2 8 17 8 31 10 1 27 1 10 09 12 211 77 11 4 96 0 1, 4 7 3 0 6 02 224415 29 7 21 0 172320 580481 47 24 8 16 1 449 12 2 97 42 14 129992 136 58 10 13 88211 228175541 338 26 43 50 8 41 4 7615 INTERSECTIONNEW 16 1 17 5 266779 469537 00 00 147258 0 0 0 0 1, 8 5 3 1, 6 2 1 1, 0 7 6 1, 5 0 1 289 120 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 69 45 10 3 67 3668 53 103 Figure 27 – Existing+Ambient+Cumulative Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes – Year 2018 Conditions Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -42- AM/PM PEAK HOUR TRIPS CHAPMAN AUTRY ST A T E C O L L E G E B L V D . A N A H E I M W A Y M A N C H E S T E R HA S T E R S T R E E T GATEWAY ANGEL LE W I S S T R E E T LEGEND STUDY INTERSECTION 57 5 HOWELL STADIUM KATELLA AVENUE A V E N U E RAM P A R T STR E E T AVENUE DU P O N T DR I V E CROSSING AVENUE 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 10. 13. 14. 11. 12. STADIUM 15. 9. RAMPSHOV ARTISAN CT. UN I O N S T . OFANAHEIM ANAHEIM REGIONALTRANSPORTATIONINTERMODAL CENTER HONDACENTER 1,1611,805939880 6 8 1 2 0 1,7 7 1 1,6 4 9 77 4 1,2 7 2 364 444 13 5 1 4 3 1,132 1,998 1,787 1,420 XXXXXX 1,3861,281 1,5192,192 1,3721,510 1,3401,966 354377 30 7 53 3 67 9 94 0 1, 2 6 2 1, 0 0 1 474468 1,3 2 3 1,7 5 8 1, 9 6 1 1, 8 4 3 36 3 40 0 1,061845 1,1351,429 1,5081,311 9641,805616639 43 1 38 7 5171,1631,6041,030390235 616 1,378 13 6 20 0 1,234 758 308220 96276 72 1 1, 1 6 9 30 5 26 0 31 4 27 6 1, 4 0 3 1, 1 8 5 89 2 1,7 2 7 1,5 1 2 1,2 4 8 38 6 52 2 69109 6961 1, 7 0 2 1,5 3 6 25 0 39 4 467319 NEW PROJECT INTERSECTION 16. 11 1 1 0 0 00 GENE WAY 17. [43,459] DAILY TRIPS[XXX] [2 9 , 1 5 5 ] [40,3 6 8 ] AVENUE ORANGEWOOD [26,186] [32 , 0 9 0 ] [4 0 , 3 4 2 ] [9,461] 4 2 9 1 3 7 1 3 3 4 3 6 5 3 8 9 6 1 6 81102 122246 10259360147 333 113 42 6 22 3 2168 25 27 80 99 83 86 308179 13 8 22 6 2561941,331967 7601,655 3675 55 7 72 9 59 2 21 9 49 9 16 0 38 6 71 7 1,38060612840 5641,209 13 5 91 32 2 34 9 296422 7 1 0 1 4 6 2 146193241181 2318 3311 75 15 0 1410 227372 441506 3646 10 383 13 7 10 0 118321 32 8117 12161 0 2 5 2 1 2 3 8 4 1 3 7 121 69 24 24 9 20 14272 0 2 3 7 6 28 17 8 31 10 1 27 1 10 09 12 211 12 4 21 3 96 0 1, 4 7 3 0 6 02 224415 29 7 21 0 172320 585486 47 24 8 16 1 44 9 12 2 97 42 14 129992 13658 10 13 88211 228 175541 338 26 43 52 8 45 4 13115 INTERSECTIONNEW 16 1 17 5 266779 494553 60124 118361 147258 98 65 14 8 98 2, 0 1 1 1, 7 2 5 1, 1 2 3 1,6 0 0 349224 0 0 0 0 00 00 0 0 69 45 10 3 67 3668 53 103 0 0 Figure 28 – Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+Project Roadway ADT & Peak Hour Intersection Traffic Volumes – Year 2018 Conditions Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -43- VI. EXISTING & FUTURE LEVELS OF SERVICE Future traffic conditions resulting from additional development may be predicted by performing a travel demand forecast. Such forecasts vary in magnitude and complexity, but at minimum include defining the streets and highways network of interest; estimating the amount of traffic generated by a given development or geographic area; determining the area wide distribution of this traffic; and assigning it to specific portions of the streets and highways network. In order to determine the magnitude and impact of additional traffic generated onto streets surrounding the project site, a travel demand forecast of future traffic conditions was undertaken for the proposed Project. Using the 2015 traffic counts and employing trip generation, distribution and assignment of future traffic, as described in Section V, existing and future roadway and intersection levels of service can be determined. As noted above, six of the fifteen study intersections are under the jurisdiction of the City of Anaheim and nine are under Caltrans control. The ICU methodology was employed to determine intersection levels of service for all study intersections. Roadway segments were evaluated based on the level of service volumes described in the City’s Circulation Element. Additionally, the nine Caltrans maintained intersections were again analyzed per the HCM method. Existing, Project, Ambient Growth, Cumulative Roadway LOS Based on a comparison between the ADT count in Appendix A of this report and the City’s Circulation Element designations for various roadway classifications (refer to Table III of this report), the LOS for study roadways for the 2015 existing and 2015 existing plus Project volumes were determined. Then, the ambient traffic (1% per year for 3 years), the cumulative project related traffic, and Project volumes were added to estimate LOS under 2018 conditions. Cumulative impacts refer to the combined effects of traffic generated by individual projects within a defined area of concern. The City’s list of committed and proposed projects will generate varying amounts of additional traffic (see Table VII). While the traffic impacts associated with each project may not be individually significant, cumulatively, the traffic impacts can be significant, or have the potential of compounding or increasing the effects of traffic impacts of the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park project in the target year 2018. As noted in Table VIII, all study roadway segments currently operate at acceptable levels of service, and should continue to operate at acceptable levels of service through the 2018 estimates. Existing & Existing+Project Intersection LOS Existing signalized intersection LOS, as calculated using the ICU method, are summarized in Table IX for the fifteen signalized intersections studied. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -44- Turn movement counts for existing traffic were taken in September 2015. Project related traffic was then added to the existing volumes to estimate Project related impacts on existing conditions. The ICU calculation forms may be found in the Appendix section of this report. As shown in the table, all intersections operate within acceptable levels of LOS “B” or better under both scenarios. TABLE IX – EXISTING & EXISTING+PROJECT (2015) ICU-BASED LOS EXISTING EXISTING+PROJECT (2015) 1 (2015) 1 A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS Katella Ave./I-5 SB Ramps 0.569 A 0.551 A 0.577 A 0.567 A Katella Ave./I-5 NB Ramps 0.371 A 0.569 A 0.375 A 0.578 A Katella Ave./Lewis St. 0.524 A 0.537 A 0.546 A 0.554 A Katella Ave./State College Blvd. 0.587 A 0.587 A 0.630 B 0.617 B Katella Ave./Stadium Crossing 0.316 A 0.442 A 0.336 A 0.452 A Katella Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.319 A 0.337 A 0.334 A 0.340 A Katella Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.358 A 0.420 A 0.365 A 0.424 A State College Blvd./Gateway 0.380 A 0.392 A 0.394 A 0.421 A State College Blvd./Gene Autry Way 0.457 A 0.407 A 0.577 A 0.526 A State College Blvd./Orangewood Ave. 0.600 A 0.565 A 0.617 B 0.588 A Orangewood Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.677 B 0.622 B 0.682 B 0.625 B Orangewood Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.575 A 0.437 A 0.578 A 0.447 A State College Blvd./I-5 NB Ramps 0.316 A 0.613 B 0.327 A 0.621 B State College Blvd./I-5 SB Ramps 0.376 A 0.339 A 0.380 A 0.341 A Gene Autry Way/I-5 HOV Ramps 0.120 A 0.118 A 0.158 A 0.194 A 1 Intersection Counts Taken by NDS, September 23, 2015 TABLE VIII – EXISTING (2015); EXISTING+PROJECT (2015); EXISTING+AMBIENT+CUMULATIVE (2018); & EXISTING+AMBIENT+CUMULATIVE+PROJECT (2018) ROADWAY SEGMENT V/C RATIO & LEVELS OF SERVICE Existing+Ambient Existing+Project Existing+Ambient +Cumulative+Project Roadway Segment Existing (2015) (2015) +Cumulative (2018) (2018) State College Blvd. Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Katella Ave. to Cerritos Ave. 26,736 A 27,142 A 28,749 A 29,155 A Katella Ave. to Orangewood 27,057 A 29,491 A 36,285 A 40,342 A Orangewood to I-5 23,445 A 24,662 A 30,873 A 32,090 A Katella Avenue Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS State College to SR-57 32,321 A 33,944 B 38,745 B 40,368 C State College to I-5 31,172 A 33,200 A 41,431 A 43,459 A Gene Autry Way Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS State College to I-5 4,210 A 5,833 A 7,838 A 9,461 A Orangewood Avenue Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS Volume LOS State College to I-5 23,232 A 23,721 A 25,697 A 26,186 A Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -45- Existing+Ambient+Cumulative & Existing+Ambient+Cumulative+Project LOS Future 2018 intersection LOS are summarized in Table X for the fifteen signalized intersections studied. Additionally, two intersections that will directly serve the Project – Gene Autry Way and Union Street, and State College Boulevard and Artisan Court, were added to the future LOS calculations using 2015 counts from surrounding roadways, and assigning ambient growth, cumulative development traffic, and Project traffic. As shown in Table X, all study intersections are estimated to continue to operate at LOS “C” or better under both scenarios. With the Project traffic added to future 2018 estimates of existing plus ambient growth plus cumulative development traffic, intersection delays increase slightly, but the LOS remains well within acceptable levels at all locations. TABLE X – EXISTING+AMBIENT+CUMULATIVE (2018) & EXISTING+AMBIENT+CUMULATIVE+PROJECT (2018) ICU-BASED LOS EXISTING+AMBIENT EXISTING+AMBIENT +CUMULATIVE (2018) 1,2 +CUMULATIVE+PROJECT (2018) 1,2 A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS ICU LOS Katella Ave./I-5 SB Ramps 0.619 B 0.642 B 0.627 B 0.657 B Katella Ave./I-5 NB Ramps 0.438 A 0.685 B 0.450 A 0.694 B Katella Ave./Lewis St. 0.648 B 0.675 B 0.670 B 0.692 B Katella Ave./State College Blvd. 0.707 C 0.755 C 0.751 C 0.785 C Katella Ave./Stadium Crossing 0.416 A 0.544 A 0.436 A 0.554 A Katella Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.394 A 0.396 A 0.409 A 0.399 A Katella Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.420 A 0.510 A 0.427 A 0.515 A State College Blvd./Gateway 0.425 A 0.451 A 0.439 A 0.480 A State College Blvd./Gene Autry Way 0.532 A 0.496 A 0.652 B 0.616 B State College Blvd./Orangewood Ave. 0.706 C 0.623 B 0.724 C 0.645 B Orangewood Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 0.765 C 0.677 B 0.770 C 0.680 B Orangewood Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 0.605 B 0.514 A 0.608 B 0.518 A State College Blvd./I-5 NB Ramps 0.351 A 0.650 B 0.362 A 0.657 B State College Blvd./I-5 SB Ramps 0.403 A 0.356 A 0.406 A 0.358 A Gene Autry Way/I-5 HOV Ramps 0.137 A 0.146 A 0.164 A 0.156 A State College Blvd./Artisan Court 0.414 A 0.369 A 0.445 A 0.389 A Gene Autry Way/Union St. 0.167 A 0.113 A 0.260 A 0.307 A 1 Intersection Counts Taken by NDS, September 23, 2015 2 Inclusive of Ambient Growth at 1% Per Year Table XI shows the results of the HCM method of determining LOS for the Caltrans maintained intersections. As indicated, all intersections are projected to operate within acceptable levels of LOS “C” or better. Between the existing 2015 conditions, and the existing+ambient+project+cumulative conditions in 2018, all of the intersections experience an increase in delays and in some cases, worsening LOS. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -46- TABLE XI – EXISTING (2015) & EXISTING+AMBIENT+PROJECT+ CUMULATIVE (2018) HCM-BASED LOS EXISTING EXISTING+AMBIENT (2015) 1 +PROJECT+CUMULATIVE (2018) 2 A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour A.M. Peak Hour P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Delay3 LOS Katella Ave./I-5 SB Ramps 20.0 B 14.3 B 22.0 C 17.0 B Katella Ave./I-5 NB Ramps 17.9 B 24.2 C 21.6 C 29.5 C Katella Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 16.9 B 18.1 B 21.7 C 21.3 C Katella Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 18.1 B 18.4 B 21.5 C 22.2 C Orangewood Ave./SR-57 SB Ramps 30.2 C 23.2 C 34.4 C 25.3 C Orangewood Ave./SR-57 NB Ramps 19.4 B 15.7 B 20.1 C 18.8 C State College Blvd./I-5 NB Ramps 20.7 C 19.8 B 23.8 C 21.2 C State College Blvd./I-5 SB Ramps 21.1 C 13.9 B 22.7 C 14.7 B 1 Intersection Counts Taken by NDS, September 23, 2015 2 Inclusive of Ambient Growth at 1% Per Year, Plus Project and Cumulative Development Traffic 3 Worst Case Direction Average Intersection Delay Per Vehicle (In Seconds) VII. SITE ACCESS, CIRCULATION, & PARKING Proposed site access, internal circulation, and parking for the proposed Project were analyzed by reviewing the projected inbound and outbound traffic during the A.M. and P.M. peak hour. Street and Traffic Improvements The proposed geometric configuration and striping for mandatory and voluntary street improvements to Gene Autry Way; Union Street (new); Artisan Court (widening the north side of street); the private north-south street (new); and State College Boulevard (widening) are illustrated in Figures 29, 30, 31, 32, and 33, respectively. It should be noted that the details of the street improvements may be modified after approval of this study. The Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan (PTIP) describes mandatory roadway improvement to be constructed within the Platinum Triangle, including “Gene Autry Way Project 4A,” consisting of the segment of Gene Autry Way from the I-5 to State College Boulevard, and “State College Boulevard Project 2A,” consisting of the segment of State College Boulevard from Orangewood Avenue to just south of Katella Avenue. According to the PTIP, Gene Autry Way will require right of way dedication of 4.5 feet to create a 57.5-foot half right of way width along the Project frontage. Prior to the intersection with State College Boulevard, Gene Autry Way will transition to a 62.5- foot right of way, which will require a right of way dedication of 9.5 feet.M To the west M Plan No. G-1 & G-2, Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan – Gene Autry Way, from I-5 to State College Boulevard, City of Anaheim, July 2013. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -47- of the transition, Gene Autry Way will require roadway widening of 11 feet to create a 43-foot half roadway width. East of the transition, roadway widening of 16 feet will be required to create a 48-foot half roadway width. Per the PTIP, State College Boulevard will require right of way dedication of 12 feet to create a 72-foot half right of way width along the Project frontage.N State College Boulevard will require roadway widening of 16 feet to create a 59-foot half roadway width. Signal modification will be required at the intersection of State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way to accommodate the new traffic lane configurations. Right of way dedication and roadway widening on Artisan Court along the Project frontage vary due to varying existing right of way and roadway dimensions. The proposed northerly half right of way will transition from 31 feet from centerline to northerly property line along the westerly segment of the street to 36 feet along the easterly segment of the street. The roadway will transition from 13 feet from centerline to northerly curb face along the westerly segment of the street to 23 feet prior to the intersection with State College Boulevard. Parallel parking stalls will also be provided along the Project frontage. The future Union Street, previously known within the PTIP as Market Street, has been changed in designation to a Connector Street. Union Street will require right of way dedication ranging from 46 feet near the southerly property line to 68 feet prior to the intersection with Gene Autry Way, inclusive of a roadway width transitioning from 26 feet near the southerly property line to 40 feet prior to the intersection with Gene Autry Way. Parallel parking stalls will be provided on the westerly side of Union Street near the intersection with Gene Autry Way. N Plan No. SC-2, Platinum Triangle Implementation Plan – State College Boulevard Alignment, from 450’ n/o Orangewood Ave to 400’ n/o Gene Autry Way, City of Anaheim, July 2013. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -48- Figure 29 – Gene Autry Way Improvements Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -49- Figure 30 – Union Street Improvements Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -50- Figure 31 – Artisan Way Improvements Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -51- Figure 32 – Private Street Improvements Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -52- Figure 33 – State College Boulevard Improvements Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -53- Table XII and Table XIII below provide a summary of the street designations as well as required property dedications (Table XII) and roadway widening (Table XIII). TABLE XIII: ROADWAY WIDENING Existing Half Roadway Width Required Half Roadway Width Roadway Widening Requirement State College (Major Arterial) 43 feet 59 feet 16 feet Gene Autry West of Transition (Primary Arterial) 32 feet 43 feet 11 feet Gene Autry East of Transition (Primary Arterial) 32 feet 48 feet 16 feet Artisan Court (Connector St) Varies (11 feet to 23 feet) Varies (13 feet to 23 feet) Varies Site Access Access to the Project will be provided via a future signalized intersection at Gene Autry Way and Union Street that will provide full access (i.e. ingress and egress in all directions); an existing signalized intersection at State College Boulevard and Artisan Court that provides full access (i.e. ingress and egress in all directions); and a right- in, right-out only private street off Gene Autry Way between Union Street and State College Boulevard. TABLE XII: RIGHT OF WAY DEDICATION Existing Half Right of Way Width Required Half Right of Way Width Required Property Dedication State College (Major Arterial) 60 feet (43-foot roadway; 17- foot face-of-curb to property line) 72 feet (59-foot roadway; 13- foot face-of-curb to property line) 12 feet Gene Autry West of Transition (Primary Arterial) 53 feet (32-foot roadway; 21- foot face-of-curb to property line) 57.5 feet (43-foot roadway; 14.5-foot face-of-curb to property line) 4.5 feet Gene Autry East of Transition (Primary Arterial) 53 feet (32-foot roadway; 21- foot face-of-curb to property line) 62.5 feet (48-foot roadway; 14.5-foot face-of-curb to property line) 9.5 feet Artisan Court (Connector St) Varies (28 feet to 33 feet) Varies (31 feet to 36 feet) Varies Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -54- Since the extension of Artisan Court west to Union Street is not part of the Project, interim access in 2018 to each of the three phases of the Project will be provided as follows: Phase 1 will only be accessible via the Union Street signal at Gene Autry Way; Phase 2 will be accessible via the Union Street signal at Gene Autry Way and the private street at Gene Autry Way; and, Phase 3 will be accessible via Artisan Court and the private street at Gene Autry Way. Internal Circulation A review of the site plan for the proposed Project reveals a simple, yet efficient, circulation system with convenient access to each of the three components of the Project – a 370-unit apartment complex; a 376-unit apartment complex with 9,600 square feet of live/work space; and a mixed-use complex with 333 apartment units and 9,800 square feet of commercial space. Direct access into and out of the 370- unit apartment complex will be provided via two driveways along Union Street. Direct access into and out of the 376-unit apartment complex with 9,600 square feet of live/work space will be provided via one driveway on Union Street and one driveway on the private north-south street. Direct access into and out of the 333-unit apartment complex with 9,800 square feet of commercial space will be provided via two driveways along the private north-south street. Parking The proposed Project will feature three distinct and separate parking facilities - a free-standing at-grade parking structure to serve part of the multi-family residential portion of the site, a free-standing at-grade parking structure to serve the live/work portion and another part of the multi-family residential portion of the site, and a free- standing, partially subterranean parking structure to serve the retail portion and remaining multi-family residential portion of the site. Vehicular access to these parking structures will be controlled by signage and an automated gate system. The entrances to all three of the parking structures are accessed via Union Street and/or the proposed private street to be located between Union Street and State College Boulevard. VIII. STUDY FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS, & RECOMMENDATIONS Construction of the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park mixed-use project will result in 1,079 new apartment units, approximately 9,800 square feet of commercial retail space, and 9,600 square feet of live/work space on a prominent 17.57-acre vacant site in the Platinum Triangle District of the City of Anaheim. The potential traffic impacts of the Project were analyzed on 7 roadway segments and 15 key intersections. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -55- Study Findings Based on the analyses presented herein, the following findings were made: 1) New traffic counts were taken in mid-September 2015, and reflect baseline traffic conditions at study intersections and on study roadway segments. 2) A comparison of new 2015 traffic counts with traffic counts that were taken at the same study locations in 2006 indicate that the amount of traffic has stayed the same, or in some cases has been reduced. 3) The new 2015 traffic counts reflect the fact that the Project site is currently vacant, whereas in 2006, traffic generated from a large restaurant (The Catch) and light industrial uses was reflected in the count. 4) By the Project target year of 2018, the Project is estimated to generate a total of 8,114 average weekday trip ends; and 730 A.M. and 822 P.M. peak hour trips ends, respectively. 5) While the Project is, by definition, a “mixed-use” development, and the potential for “internal capture” of vehicle trips will be present, the percentage of such trip reduction is uncertain. 6) While the Project will generate some degree of regular transit use, thus potentially reducing private vehicle trips, the percentage of such trip reduction is uncertain. 7) Based on the current site plan for the Project, vehicular access will be provided via a future signalized intersection at Gene Autry Way and future Union Street; a future unsignalized private street intersection on Gene Autry Way between future Union Street and State College Boulevard, and a future connection to the existing signalized intersection at State College Boulevard and Artisan Court Study Conclusions Based on the above study findings, the following conclusions were made: 1) Since new traffic counts take into consideration current land uses, traffic generated by any previous development on the subject property (i.e., restaurant and light industrial uses) cannot be deducted from the amount of traffic projected to be generated by the Project. 2) The mixed-use nature of the Project was not taken into consideration in reducing the amount of traffic projected to be generated by the Project. 3) The potential use of transit was not taken into consideration in reducing the amount of traffic projected to be generated by the Project. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -56- 4) Using counts taken in the fall of 2015, (existing traffic conditions), the levels of service at each of the study intersections, during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of weekday commute, fall within acceptable limits (i.e., “D” or better). 5) The addition of Project traffic to the 2015 volumes resulted in only slight increases in intersection delays, and intersection levels of service for each of the study intersections stayed within acceptable limits. 6) In the target year of 2018, with the addition of ambient growth (i.e., 1% per year) and cumulative development traffic (from other identified projects within the Platinum Triangle area), the levels of service at each of the study intersections during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of traffic are projected to stay within acceptable limits. 7) In the target year 2018, with the addition of Project traffic, the levels of service at each of the study intersections during both the A.M. and P.M. peak hours of traffic, are projected to stay within acceptable limits. 8) Using the HCM methodology to determine levels of service for State- controlled intersections (i.e., freeway ramp intersections) revealed only slight increases in delays of key turn movements, and intersection levels of service staying within acceptable limits for both the 2015 (existing), and the 2018 (existing+ambient+cumulative+Project) scenarios. 9) The three roadway segments analyzed along State College Boulevard, two segments of Katella Avenue, Gene Autry Way, and Orangewood Avenue currently operate at acceptable levels, and will continue to do so with the addition of Project traffic, ambient growth (2018) and cumulative development traffic (2018). 10) The roadway connections and parking provisions depicted on the current site plan for the Project, appear to be well situated relative to the surrounding public streets and highways network. 11) In comparing results of this study with a previous traffic study conducted for the “Experience at Gene Autry” on the same property, it was found that less traffic related impacts are anticipated with the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park Project. The previous report identified the need for lane additions that have either been implemented since 2004, or are now unnecessary due to less anticipated Project related impacts. Further, due to the intersection of State College Boulevard and Artisan Court operating well within acceptable levels of service in the 2015 and 2018 scenarios, no additional lanes (e.g., a second northbound left-turn lane) are required. Recommendations Based on the above study findings and conclusions, the proposed Project is not Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -57- anticipated to result in significantly measurable traffic impacts to any of the study street segments or intersections during the daily or A.M. or P.M. peak hours of weekday commute. Therefore, the following recommendations are made: 1) Construct Union Street from Gene Autry Way to the southern end of the Project site. 2) Complete Artisan Court street improvements on the Project site side from its present terminus west of State College Boulevard to the future Union Street. 3) Construct the intersection of Gene Autry Way and Union Street for future traffic signalization, and participate in the “fair share” cost of constructing a new traffic signal. 4) Widen Gene Autry Way to ultimate standards along the Project frontage. 5) Construct a private north-south street from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court, parallel to Union Street and restrict access to Gene Autry Way to right turn in and out only. 6) Prior to Project completion, widen State College Boulevard to ultimate standards from Gene Autry Way to Artisan Court. 7) Provide various traffic controls, including signage, striping, and pavement marking, to provide safe and efficient vehicular, pedestrian, and bicycle movement through and within the Project site. IX. REFERENCES 1. City of Anaheim Traffic and Transportation Division “Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies,” latest version. 2. City of Anaheim General Plan, Circulation Element, May 2004. 3. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), Master Plan of Arterial Highways, 2015. 4. Institute of Transportation Engineers’ (ITE) Trip Generation manual, 9TH Ed., 2012. 5. City of Anaheim “The Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project SEIR No. 339,” October 2010. 6. Caltrans’ Guide for the Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, December 2002. 7. Transportation Research Board, Highway Capacity Manual, HCM2010, 2010. Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -58- APPENDIX SECTION Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -59- Appendix A – Existing Roadway ADT Counts Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_001 NB SB EB WB 15,155 10,576 00 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00 40  22   62 220 149   369 00:15 33  13   46 196 156   352 00:30 33  19   52 215 138   353 00:45 20 126 15 69 35 195 217 848 137 580 354 1428 01:00 18  19   37 213 130   343 01:15 22  5   27 199 132   331 01:30 12  8   20 196 144   340 01:45 7 59 6 38 13 97 194 802 135 541 329 1343 02:00 15  4   19 212 125   337 02:15 11  8   19 210 134   344 02:30 7  4   11 212 159   371 02:45 15 48 6 22 21 70 220 854 180 598 400 1452 03:00 13  6   19 213 158   371 03:15 14  4   18 266 134   400 03:30 18  6   24 278 182   460 03:45 21 66 10 26 31 92 268 1025 166 640 434 1665 04:00 11  17   28 295 238   533 04:15 15  15   30 292 216   508 04:30 26  17   43 343 196   539 04:45 32 84 22 71 54 155 331 1261 230 880 561 2141 05:00 25  24   49 377 290   667 05:15 53  38   91 316 219   535 05:30 63  52   115 335 192   527 05:45 88 229 52 166 140 395 320 1348 222 923 542 2271 06:00 73  51   124 274 177   451 06:15 100  85   185 271 151   422 06:30 143  178   321 233 119   352 06:45 181 497 175 489 356 986 212 990 97 544 309 1534 07:00 159  242   401 237 107   344 07:15 200  292   492 183 107   290 07:30 222  323   545 192 84   276 07:45 281 862 346 1203 627 2065 138 750 86 384 224 1134 08:00 232  265   497 160 77   237 08:15 227  305   532 132 64   196 08:30 212  292   504 135 82   217 08:45 187 858 245 1107 432 1965 156 583 64 287 220 870 09:00 151  197   348 168 56   224 09:15 157  165   322 156 42   198 09:30 157  117   274 214 43   257 09:45 146 611 113 592 259 1203 277 815 42 183 319 998 10:00 143  110   253 313 59   372 10:15 137  109   246 306 39   345 10:30 153  127   280 157 39   196 10:45 157 590 133 479 290 1069 87 863 32 169 119 1032 11:00 163  114   277 60 36   96 11:15 169  106   275 56 25   81 11:30 211  123   334 53 19   72 11:45 228 771 136 479 364 1250 46 215 26 106 72 321 TOTALS 4801 4741 9542 10354 5835 16189 SPLIT %50.3% 49.7%37.1%64.0% 36.0%62.9% NB SB EB WB 15,155 10,576 00 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 962 1239 2201 1367 935 2302 Pk Hr Factor 0.856 0.895 0.878 0.906 0.806 0.863 7 ‐ 9 Volume 1720 2310 004030 2609 1803 004412 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:30 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 962 1239 0 0 2201 1367 935 0 0 2302  Pk Hr Factor 0.856 0.895 0.000 0.000 0.878 0.906 0.806 0.000 0.000 0.863 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 25,731 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 State College Blvd Bet. Katella Ave & Cerritos Ave 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 25,731 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 9/22/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_001 NB SB EB WB 15,828 10,908 00 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00 50  20   70 222 168   390 00:15 27  24   51 247 137   384 00:30 24  22   46 210 152   362 00:45 36 137 22 88 58 225 233 912 150 607 383 1519 01:00 13  9   22 247 117   364 01:15 17  10   27 205 167   372 01:30 12  5   17 221 118   339 01:45 14 56 9 33 23 89 260 933 132 534 392 1467 02:00 15  5   20 208 115   323 02:15 10  8   18 253 131   384 02:30 10  9   19 216 154   370 02:45 12 47 5 27 17 74 204 881 184 584 388 1465 03:00 16  4   20 253 162   415 03:15 13  8   21 236 167   403 03:30 27  8   35 273 171   444 03:45 24 80 11 31 35 111 252 1014 173 673 425 1687 04:00 12  13   25 269 234   503 04:15 32  22   54 241 200   441 04:30 32  21   53 264 237   501 04:45 35 111 22 78 57 189 311 1085 262 933 573 2018 05:00 27  31   58 301 332   633 05:15 53  27   80 331 262   593 05:30 77  46   123 330 228   558 05:45 82 239 51 155 133 394 285 1247 186 1008 471 2255 06:00 84  58   142 237 164   401 06:15 92  85   177 271 160   431 06:30 146  140   286 237 122   359 06:45 167 489 181 464 348 953 235 980 114 560 349 1540 07:00 175  264   439 273 122   395 07:15 243  350   593 238 105   343 07:30 271  331   602 269 85   354 07:45 232 921 403 1348 635 2269 274 1054 74 386 348 1440 08:00 254  312   566 373 76   449 08:15 190  262   452 272 48   320 08:30 170  298   468 157 53   210 08:45 173 787 233 1105 406 1892 138 940 52 229 190 1169 09:00 184  198   382 154 41   195 09:15 160  165   325 142 53   195 09:30 181  123   304 155 53   208 09:45 146 671 104 590 250 1261 170 621 27 174 197 795 10:00 151  124   275 164 38   202 10:15 146  106   252 181 40   221 10:30 148  125   273 291 52   343 10:45 145 590 114 469 259 1059 280 916 46 176 326 1092 11:00 214  129   343 115 35   150 11:15 192  126   318 70 30   100 11:30 213  135   348 59 27   86 11:45 213 832 142 532 355 1364 41 285 32 124 73 409 TOTALS 4960 4920 9880 10868 5988 16856 SPLIT %50.2% 49.8%37.0%64.5% 35.5%63.0% NB SB EB WB 15,828 10,908 00 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:30 16:45 AM Pk Volume 1000 1396 2396 1273 1093 2357 Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.866 0.943 0.961 0.823 0.931 7 ‐ 9 Volume 1708 2453 004161 2332 1941 004273 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:30 16:45 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 1000 1396 0 0 2396 1273 1093 0 0 2357  Pk Hr Factor 0.923 0.866 0.000 0.000 0.943 0.961 0.823 0.000 0.000 0.931 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME State College Blvd Bet. Katella Ave & Cerritos Ave Wednesday 9/23/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 26,736 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 DAILY TOTALS Total 26,736 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 1 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 5 St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  Be t .  Ka t e l l a  Av e  &  Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 1 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  Be t .  Ka t e l l a  Av e  &  0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_002 NB SB EB WB 11,588 14,332 00 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00 30  34   64 200 197   397 00:15 35  19   54 152 203   355 00:30 28  28   56 179 198   377 00:45 17 110 20 101 37 211 183 714 192 790 375 1504 01:00 15  22   37 190 211   401 01:15 17  8   25 156 196   352 01:30 9  11   20 185 190   375 01:45 8 49 8 49 16 98 161 692 201 798 362 1490 02:00 12  10   22 201 161   362 02:15 10  11   21 164 187   351 02:30 7  12   19 223 222   445 02:45 16 45 7 40 23 85 187 775 187 757 374 1532 03:00 17  8   25 173 200   373 03:15 14  7   21 197 181   378 03:30 13  12   25 194 241   435 03:45 21 65 12 39 33 104 212 776 216 838 428 1614 04:00 11  15   26 207 298   505 04:15 17  21   38 260 261   521 04:30 22  24   46 242 287   529 04:45 34 84 32 92 66 176 267 976 291 1137 558 2113 05:00 26  30   56 297 342   639 05:15 43  44   87 277 275   552 05:30 47  63   110 272 302   574 05:45 62 178 95 232 157 410 256 1102 257 1176 513 2278 06:00 47  114   161 213 241   454 06:15 61  129   190 194 206   400 06:30 98  203   301 207 173   380 06:45 122 328 270 716 392 1044 135 749 136 756 271 1505 07:00 114  311   425 162 140   302 07:15 122  444   566 117 124   241 07:30 149  412   561 125 122   247 07:45 174 559 558 1725 732 2284 89 493 96 482 185 975 08:00 161  388   549 105 107   212 08:15 219  393   612 98 85   183 08:30 171  385   556 98 106   204 08:45 151 702 353 1519 504 2221 93 394 91 389 184 783 09:00 143  233   376 102 72   174 09:15 130  211   341 88 80   168 09:30 132  150   282 105 72   177 09:45 125 530 158 752 283 1282 134 429 65 289 199 718 10:00 107  142   249 160 96   256 10:15 131  138   269 177 48   225 10:30 128  146   274 116 54   170 10:45 157 523 153 579 310 1102 71 524 45 243 116 767 11:00 136  165   301 53 49   102 11:15 131  161   292 46 40   86 11:30 170  174   344 37 37   74 11:45 191 628 175 675 366 1303 27 163 32 158 59 321 TOTALS 3801 6519 10320 7787 7813 15600 SPLIT %36.8% 63.2%39.8%49.9% 50.1%60.2% NB SB EB WB 11,588 14,332 00 AM Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45 AM Pk Volume 725 1802 2454 1113 1210 2323 Pk Hr Factor 0.828 0.807 0.838 0.937 0.885 0.909 7 ‐ 9 Volume 1261 3244 004505 2078 2313 004391 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:45 07:15 07:30 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 725 1802 0 0 2454 1113 1210 0 0 2323  Pk Hr Factor 0.828 0.807 0.000 0.000 0.838 0.937 0.885 0.000 0.000 0.909 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 25,920 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 State College Blvd Bet. Katella Ave & Orangewood Ave 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 25,920 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 9/22/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_002 NB SB EB WB 12,821 14,236 00 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00 25  25   50 194 221   415 00:15 24  30   54 192 191   383 00:30 20  29   49 175 206   381 00:45 30 99 24 108 54 207 181 742 239 857 420 1599 01:00 12  14   26 195 184   379 01:15 20  13   33 179 208   387 01:30 17  12   29 192 176   368 01:45 12 61 11 50 23 111 181 747 200 768 381 1515 02:00 6  11   17 175 160   335 02:15 8  13   21 196 168   364 02:30 8  13   21 195 192   387 02:45 17 39 8 45 25 84 189 755 208 728 397 1483 03:00 13  6   19 184 216   400 03:15 12  7   19 190 217   407 03:30 23  16   39 201 244   445 03:45 18 66 11 40 29 106 214 789 241 918 455 1707 04:00 12  18   30 265 253   518 04:15 21  20   41 289 269   558 04:30 24  19   43 246 304   550 04:45 33 90 30 87 63 177 313 1113 288 1114 601 2227 05:00 24  37   61 285 399   684 05:15 32  48   80 386 351   737 05:30 36  54   90 308 335   643 05:45 70 162 84 223 154 385 293 1272 284 1369 577 2641 06:00 57  119   176 208 219   427 06:15 87  147   234 216 205   421 06:30 106  178   284 197 179   376 06:45 100 350 246 690 346 1040 174 795 154 757 328 1552 07:00 184  315   499 152 154   306 07:15 229  380   609 147 122   269 07:30 202  388   590 160 122   282 07:45 256 871 473 1556 729 2427 170 629 121 519 291 1148 08:00 204  361   565 223 121   344 08:15 202  309   511 209 99   308 08:30 169  334   503 115 85   200 08:45 165 740 235 1239 400 1979 110 657 95 400 205 1057 09:00 168  234   402 108 82   190 09:15 159  160   319 98 93   191 09:30 146  190   336 77 94   171 09:45 111 584 161 745 272 1329 66 349 78 347 144 696 10:00 116  153   269 79 84   163 10:15 142  138   280 83 54   137 10:30 133  148   281 122 63   185 10:45 138 529 138 577 276 1106 168 452 59 260 227 712 11:00 149  136   285 94 51   145 11:15 170  180   350 72 42   114 11:30 176  159   335 44 41   85 11:45 182 677 190 665 372 1342 43 253 40 174 83 427 TOTALS 4268 6025 10293 8553 8211 16764 SPLIT %41.5% 58.5%38.0%51.0% 49.0%62.0% NB SB EB WB 12,821 14,236 00 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45 AM Pk Volume 891 1602 2493 1292 1373 2665 Pk Hr Factor 0.870 0.847 0.855 0.837 0.860 0.904 7 ‐ 9 Volume 1611 2795 004406 2385 2483 004868 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 891 1602 0 0 2493 1292 1373 0 0 2665  Pk Hr Factor 0.870 0.847 0.000 0.000 0.855 0.837 0.860 0.000 0.000 0.904 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME State College Blvd Bet. Katella Ave & Orangewood Ave Wednesday 9/23/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 27,057 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 DAILY TOTALS Total 27,057 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 2 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 5 St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  Be t .  Ka t e l l a  Av e  &  Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 18 0 0 20 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 2 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  Be t .  Ka t e l l a  Av e  &  0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 18 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_003 NB SB EB WB 10,124 12,295 00 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00 9  24   33 183 188   371 00:15 15  18   33 172 182   354 00:30 9  24   33 163 167   330 00:45 6 39 19 85 25 124 183 701 168 705 351 1406 01:00 4  13   17 182 164   346 01:15 11  8   19 182 152   334 01:30 4  8   12 168 159   327 01:45 7 26 8 37 15 63 137 669 165 640 302 1309 02:00 6  9   15 132 140   272 02:15 6  7   13 135 151   286 02:30 10  9   19 155 174   329 02:45 5 27 4 29 9 56 165 587 154 619 319 1206 03:00 5  6   11 168 149   317 03:15 6  3   9 188 164   352 03:30 8  6   14 186 214   400 03:45 10 29 8 23 18 52 219 761 198 725 417 1486 04:00 3  12   15 150 280   430 04:15 8  14   22 191 237   428 04:30 13  20   33 175 271   446 04:45 17 41 20 66 37 107 216 732 273 1061 489 1793 05:00 12  30   42 244 362   606 05:15 16  24   40 229 292   521 05:30 25  35   60 200 315   515 05:45 43 96 58 147 101 243 198 871 256 1225 454 2096 06:00 79  66   145 216 229   445 06:15 76  82   158 183 170   353 06:30 163  147   310 183 161   344 06:45 186 504 205 500 391 1004 132 714 146 706 278 1420 07:00 172  238   410 147 147   294 07:15 221  368   589 127 115   242 07:30 205  313   518 111 116   227 07:45 233 831 420 1339 653 2170 87 472 96 474 183 946 08:00 218  291   509 67 114   181 08:15 198  344   542 61 90   151 08:30 173  299   472 69 89   158 08:45 48 637 283 1217 331 1854 50 247 67 360 117 607 09:00 147  190   337 54 67   121 09:15 175  172   347 56 68   124 09:30 147  125   272 43 59   102 09:45 168 637 127 614 295 1251 49 202 79 273 128 475 10:00 129  139   268 37 82   119 10:15 139  106   245 35 48   83 10:30 129  128   257 32 43   75 10:45 129 526 121 494 250 1020 28 132 38 211 66 343 11:00 149  129   278 35 39   74 11:15 130  161   291 24 43   67 11:30 127  165   292 21 32   53 11:45 140 546 147 602 287 1148 17 97 29 143 46 240 TOTALS 3939 5153 9092 6185 7142 13327 SPLIT %43.3% 56.7%40.6%46.4% 53.6%59.4% NB SB EB WB 10,124 12,295 00 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45 AM Pk Volume 877 1392 2269 889 1242 2131 Pk Hr Factor 0.941 0.829 0.869 0.911 0.858 0.879 7 ‐ 9 Volume 1468 2556 004024 1603 2286 003889 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:15 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 877 1392 0 0 2269 889 1242 0 0 2131  Pk Hr Factor 0.941 0.829 0.000 0.000 0.869 0.911 0.858 0.000 0.000 0.879 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 22,419 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 State College Blvd Bet. Orangewood Ave & I‐5 Freeway 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 22,419 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 9/22/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_003 NB SB EB WB 10,939 12,506 00 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00 20  14   34 170 189   359 00:15 19  32   51 176 187   363 00:30 12  30   42 185 165   350 00:45 11 62 19 95 30 157 192 723 168 709 360 1432 01:00 6  15   21 175 162   337 01:15 10  10   20 179 170   349 01:30 17  11   28 176 145   321 01:45 3 36 6 42 9 78 153 683 167 644 320 1327 02:00 6  7   13 170 144   314 02:15 10  7   17 166 133   299 02:30 5  5   10 133 163   296 02:45 8 29 3 22 11 51 164 633 186 626 350 1259 03:00 5  3   8 156 160   316 03:15 4  4   8 156 187   343 03:30 4  9   13 144 208   352 03:45 9 22 11 27 20 49 199 655 213 768 412 1423 04:00 4  17   21 215 259   474 04:15 10  13   23 249 256   505 04:30 12  15   27 238 304   542 04:45 18 44 23 68 41 112 291 993 320 1139 611 2132 05:00 15  28   43 283 364   647 05:15 24  28   52 329 369   698 05:30 22  40   62 277 288   565 05:45 45 106 51 147 96 253 256 1145 297 1318 553 2463 06:00 69  77   146 209 210   419 06:15 114  91   205 170 175   345 06:30 156  122   278 185 166   351 06:45 188 527 201 491 389 1018 121 685 125 676 246 1361 07:00 225  275   500 106 140   246 07:15 219  319   538 123 107   230 07:30 211  361   572 89 115   204 07:45 262 917 357 1312 619 2229 112 430 112 474 224 904 08:00 242  301   543 58 110   168 08:15 218  325   543 44 89   133 08:30 210  281   491 41 88   129 08:45 182 852 246 1153 428 2005 37 180 85 372 122 552 09:00 175  193   368 42 83   125 09:15 164  151   315 38 79   117 09:30 187  135   322 45 71   116 09:45 158 684 145 624 303 1308 32 157 72 305 104 462 10:00 150  130   280 32 78   110 10:15 124  111   235 27 55   82 10:30 178  127   305 20 55   75 10:45 126 578 129 497 255 1075 24 103 55 243 79 346 11:00 159  127   286 16 46   62 11:15 145  163   308 25 23   48 11:30 140  141   281 18 41   59 11:45 176 620 179 610 355 1230 16 75 34 144 50 219 TOTALS 4477 5088 9565 6462 7418 13880 SPLIT %46.8% 53.2%40.8%46.6% 53.4%59.2% NB SB EB WB 10,939 12,506 00 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45 AM Pk Volume 934 1344 2277 1180 1357 2521 Pk Hr Factor 0.891 0.931 0.920 0.897 0.919 0.903 7 ‐ 9 Volume 1769 2465 004234 2138 2457 004595 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:30 16:45 16:30 16:45 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 934 1344 0 0 2277 1180 1357 0 0 2521  Pk Hr Factor 0.891 0.931 0.000 0.000 0.920 0.897 0.919 0.000 0.000 0.903 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME State College Blvd Bet. Orangewood Ave & I‐5 Freeway Wednesday 9/23/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 23,445 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 DAILY TOTALS Total 23,445 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 3 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 5 St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  Be t .  Or a n g e w o o d  Av e  & I ‐Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 3 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  Be t .  Or a n g e w o o d  Av e  & I ‐ 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_004 NB SB EB WB 00 15,708 15,614 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   62  23 85  221  211 432 00:15   41  27 68  241  247 488 00:30   36  15 51  250  198 448 00:45 23 162 19 84 42 246 266 978 221 877 487 1855 01:00   31  10 41  252  244 496 01:15   27  10 37  249  227 476 01:30   20  11 31  256  219 475 01:45 22 100 10 41 32 141 241 998 263 953 504 1951 02:00   8  13 21  255  219 474 02:15   17  11 28  268  270 538 02:30   10  15 25  230  245 475 02:45 17 52 12 51 29 103 230 983 237 971 467 1954 03:00   19  11 30  270  290 560 03:15   5  11 16  253  242 495 03:30   19  21 40  254  267 521 03:45 26 69 16 59 42 128 287 1064 302 1101 589 2165 04:00   14  19 33  241  326 567 04:15   20  30 50  230  327 557 04:30   36  54 90  266  307 573 04:45 43 113 47 150 90 263 271 1008 327 1287 598 2295 05:00   52  60 112  287  327 614 05:15   75  93 168  290  407 697 05:30   95  103 198  258  344 602 05:45 125 347 102 358 227 705 242 1077 324 1402 566 2479 06:00   111  198 309  219  259 478 06:15   173  176 349  196  302 498 06:30   179  197 376  184  200 384 06:45 226 689 172 743 398 1432 201 800 210 971 411 1771 07:00   235  253 488  195  212 407 07:15   265  239 504  162  172 334 07:30   305  292 597  183  146 329 07:45 288 1093 308 1092 596 2185 167 707 148 678 315 1385 08:00   279  285 564  140  137 277 08:15   270  210 480  145  134 279 08:30   273  263 536  194  110 304 08:45 243 1065 228 986 471 2051 141 620 118 499 259 1119 09:00   213  204 417  154  91 245 09:15   202  191 393  141  101 242 09:30   166  206 372  135  88 223 09:45 192 773 177 778 369 1551 158 588 89 369 247 957 10:00   168  200 368  118  83 201 10:15   187  203 390  144  62 206 10:30   186  203 389  140  71 211 10:45 192 733 219 825 411 1558 120 522 52 268 172 790 11:00   194  206 400  97  48 145 11:15   191  245 436  108  51 159 11:30   213  209 422  66  40 106 11:45 232 830 240 900 472 1730 66 337 32 171 98 508 TOTALS 6026 6067 12093 9682 9547 19229 SPLIT %49.8% 50.2%38.6%50.4% 49.6%61.4% NB SB EB WB 00 15,708 15,614 AM Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 16:30 16:45 16:45 AM Pk Volume 1142 1124 2261 1114 1405 2511 Pk Hr Factor 0.936 0.912 0.947 0.960 0.863 0.901 7 ‐ 9 Volume 002158 2078 4236 002085 2689 4774 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:30 07:15 07:15 16:30 16:45 16:45 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1142 1124 2261 0 0 1114 1405 2511  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.936 0.912 0.947 0.000 0.000 0.960 0.863 0.901 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 31,322 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 Katella Ave Bet. State College Blvd & SR‐57 Freeway 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 31,322 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 9/22/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_004 NB SB EB WB 00 16,133 16,188 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   75  30 105  242  219 461 00:15   62  29 91  229  238 467 00:30   32  21 53  249  218 467 00:45 26 195 13 93 39 288 268 988 270 945 538 1933 01:00   22  12 34  257  236 493 01:15   23  16 39  256  199 455 01:30   25  11 36  251  220 471 01:45 24 94 9 48 33 142 257 1021 251 906 508 1927 02:00   15  3 18  251  210 461 02:15   18  9 27  201  302 503 02:30   18  17 35  220  251 471 02:45 8 59 10 39 18 98 237 909 284 1047 521 1956 03:00   11  12 23  252  284 536 03:15   17  16 33  261  284 545 03:30   13  26 39  289  268 557 03:45 26 67 18 72 44 139 284 1086 287 1123 571 2209 04:00   22  27 49  211  366 577 04:15   29  40 69  231  339 570 04:30   38  44 82  264  390 654 04:45 52 141 66 177 118 318 286 992 371 1466 657 2458 05:00   54  77 131  275  419 694 05:15   74  80 154  328  390 718 05:30   102  97 199  232  357 589 05:45 138 368 133 387 271 755 267 1102 329 1495 596 2597 06:00   120  177 297  240  284 524 06:15   150  160 310  228  322 550 06:30   166  171 337  199  220 419 06:45 199 635 189 697 388 1332 203 870 226 1052 429 1922 07:00   213  204 417  194  180 374 07:15   278  233 511  164  181 345 07:30   339  227 566  168  158 326 07:45 348 1178 263 927 611 2105 171 697 187 706 358 1403 08:00   269  293 562  168  189 357 08:15   265  239 504  168  158 326 08:30   283  232 515  162  139 301 08:45 242 1059 223 987 465 2046 144 642 120 606 264 1248 09:00   181  225 406  180  146 326 09:15   203  207 410  134  109 243 09:30   215  204 419  141  128 269 09:45 195 794 204 840 399 1634 143 598 117 500 260 1098 10:00   179  183 362  156  78 234 10:15   193  191 384  152  70 222 10:30   185  203 388  139  70 209 10:45 207 764 196 773 403 1537 113 560 61 279 174 839 11:00   194  187 381  133  47 180 11:15   228  245 473  103  39 142 11:30   231  199 430  126  45 171 11:45 204 857 225 856 429 1713 95 457 36 167 131 624 TOTALS 6211 5896 12107 9922 10292 20214 SPLIT %51.3% 48.7%37.5%49.1% 50.9%62.5% NB SB EB WB 00 16,133 16,188 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:45 07:15 16:30 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 1234 1027 2250 1153 1570 2723 Pk Hr Factor 0.886 0.876 0.921 0.879 0.937 0.948 7 ‐ 9 Volume 002237 1914 4151 002094 2961 5055 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:45 07:15 16:30 16:30 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1234 1027 2250 0 0 1153 1570 2723  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.886 0.876 0.921 0.000 0.000 0.879 0.937 0.948 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME Katella Ave Bet. State College Blvd & SR‐57 Freeway Wednesday 9/23/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 32,321 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 DAILY TOTALS Total 32,321 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 4 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 5 Ka t e l l a  Av e  Be t .  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  & SR ‐57  Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 4 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D Ka t e l l a  Av e  Be t .  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  & SR ‐57   0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_005 NB SB EB WB 00 15,364 15,808 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   58  34 92  227  254 481 00:15   41  31 72  190  236 426 00:30   32  27 59  244  226 470 00:45 25 156 27 119 52 275 230 891 199 915 429 1806 01:00   28  18 46  217  245 462 01:15   17  19 36  232  194 426 01:30   12  18 30  230  256 486 01:45 19 76 16 71 35 147 217 896 231 926 448 1822 02:00   12  16 28  237  232 469 02:15   8  10 18  225  263 488 02:30   12  14 26  267  270 537 02:45 9 41 6 46 15 87 232 961 247 1012 479 1973 03:00   15  10 25  245  311 556 03:15   9  17 26  217  275 492 03:30   23  27 50  245  372 617 03:45 27 74 24 78 51 152 235 942 290 1248 525 2190 04:00   15  35 50  250  388 638 04:15   25  47 72  213  323 536 04:30   27  51 78  299  375 674 04:45 49 116 50 183 99 299 239 1001 357 1443 596 2444 05:00   86  103 189  247  428 675 05:15   126  122 248  244  409 653 05:30   173  116 289  232  306 538 05:45 228 613 133 474 361 1087 165 888 329 1472 494 2360 06:00   208  138 346  181  263 444 06:15   213  153 366  195  250 445 06:30   181  205 386  207  226 433 06:45 329 931 206 702 535 1633 186 769 190 929 376 1698 07:00   232  173 405  193  213 406 07:15   324  165 489  195  156 351 07:30   265  180 445  213  171 384 07:45 343 1164 191 709 534 1873 176 777 154 694 330 1471 08:00   281  196 477  104  146 250 08:15   277  163 440  112  141 253 08:30   254  185 439  129  139 268 08:45 294 1106 186 730 480 1836 109 454 136 562 245 1016 09:00   227  182 409  103  101 204 09:15   220  187 407  103  122 225 09:30   163  211 374  119  106 225 09:45 213 823 184 764 397 1587 121 446 101 430 222 876 10:00   192  210 402  92  112 204 10:15   155  181 336  104  97 201 10:30   166  200 366  122  84 206 10:45 205 718 199 790 404 1508 95 413 67 360 162 773 11:00   202  237 439  86  65 151 11:15   213  212 425  74  68 142 11:30   198  256 454  59  50 109 11:45 220 833 227 932 447 1765 56 275 36 219 92 494 TOTALS 6651 5598 12249 8713 10210 18923 SPLIT %54.3% 45.7%39.3%46.0% 54.0%60.7% NB SB EB WB 00 15,364 15,808 AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:30 07:15 16:30 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 1213 973 1945 1029 1569 2598 Pk Hr Factor 0.884 0.950 0.911 0.860 0.916 0.962 7 ‐ 9 Volume 002270 1439 3709 001889 2915 4804 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:45 07:15 16:30 16:30 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1213 735 1945 0 0 1029 1569 2598  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.884 0.938 0.911 0.000 0.000 0.860 0.916 0.962 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 31,172 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 Katella Ave Bet. State College Blvd & I‐5 Freeway 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 31,172 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 9/22/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1224_005 NB SB EB WB 00 14,577 15,491 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   64  38 102  194  252 446 00:15   44  42 86  197  217 414 00:30   32  25 57  200  212 412 00:45 28 168 27 132 55 300 186 777 223 904 409 1681 01:00   19  18 37  222  212 434 01:15   24  29 53  194  199 393 01:30   18  21 39  226  246 472 01:45 24 85 28 96 52 181 205 847 138 795 343 1642 02:00   17  26 43  211  238 449 02:15   14  14 28  197  220 417 02:30   13  21 34  221  208 429 02:45 11 55 17 78 28 133 197 826 281 947 478 1773 03:00   13  19 32  229  363 592 03:15   14  17 31  269  292 561 03:30   16  34 50  282  331 613 03:45 20 63 25 95 45 158 253 1033 334 1320 587 2353 04:00   23  27 50  210  330 540 04:15   26  50 76  172  352 524 04:30   35  50 85  266  360 626 04:45 54 138 57 184 111 322 200 848 356 1398 556 2246 05:00   61  90 151  282  415 697 05:15   73  89 162  170  420 590 05:30   93  111 204  226  366 592 05:45 148 375 123 413 271 788 226 904 306 1507 532 2411 06:00   187  161 348  205  276 481 06:15   179  136 315  195  198 393 06:30   195  184 379  166  232 398 06:45 293 854 168 649 461 1503 203 769 161 867 364 1636 07:00   205  161 366  157  188 345 07:15   275  197 472  138  157 295 07:30   309  167 476  163  152 315 07:45 338 1127 174 699 512 1826 147 605 125 622 272 1227 08:00   288  209 497  181  155 336 08:15   273  204 477  139  133 272 08:30   230  187 417  165  129 294 08:45 233 1024 200 800 433 1824 171 656 113 530 284 1186 09:00   187  224 411  129  125 254 09:15   190  183 373  92  100 192 09:30   213  184 397  110  93 203 09:45 184 774 207 798 391 1572 110 441 74 392 184 833 10:00   149  203 352  101  94 195 10:15   194  203 397  133  89 222 10:30   170  190 360  99  74 173 10:45 202 715 211 807 413 1522 108 441 80 337 188 778 11:00   157  258 415  91  56 147 11:15   216  208 424  81  56 137 11:30   187  209 396  70  52 122 11:45 192 752 237 912 429 1664 58 300 45 209 103 509 TOTALS 6130 5663 11793 8447 9828 18275 SPLIT %52.0% 48.0%39.2%46.2% 53.8%60.8% NB SB EB WB 00 14,577 15,491 AM Peak Hour 07:15 11:45 07:30 15:00 16:45 16:30 AM Pk Volume 1210 918 1962 1033 1557 2469 Pk Hr Factor 0.895 0.911 0.958 0.916 0.927 0.886 7 ‐ 9 Volume 002151 1499 3650 001752 2905 4657 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 08:00 07:30 16:15 16:45 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1210 800 1962 0 0 920 1557 2469  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.895 0.957 0.958 0.000 0.000 0.816 0.927 0.886 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME Katella Ave Bet. State College Blvd & I‐5 Freeway Wednesday 9/23/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 30,068 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 DAILY TOTALS Total 30,068 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 5 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 2 / 2 0 1 5 Ka t e l l a  Av e  Be t .  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  & I ‐5   Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 2 4 _ 0 0 5 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 9/ 2 3 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D Ka t e l l a  Av e  Be t .  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  & I ‐5   0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1262_001 NB SB EB WB 00 2,238 1,964 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   2  7 9  24  31 55 00:15   1  3 4  31  22 53 00:30   0  3 3  28  23 51 00:45 3 6 1 14 4 20 34 117 17 93 51 210 01:00   2  5 7  27  21 48 01:15   1  3 4  23  12 35 01:30   1  2 3  38  16 54 01:45 1 5 5 15 6 20 26 114 28 77 54 191 02:00   2  0 2  31  28 59 02:15   3  0 3  41  22 63 02:30   0  0 0  45  31 76 02:45 271138 401573912079277 03:00   0  2 2  39  51 90 03:15   4  1 5  40  36 76 03:30   2  4 6  35  37 72 03:45 5 11 0 7 5 18 50 164 50 174 100 338 04:00   5  0 5  25  51 76 04:15   8  2 10  44  41 85 04:30   7  3 10  38  62 100 04:45 6 26 3 8 9 34 40 147 46 200 86 347 05:00   10  7 17  40  77 117 05:15   17  8 25  31  72 103 05:30   18  4 22  34  51 85 05:45 25 70 11 30 36 100 23 128 51 251 74 379 06:00   52  16 68  31  49 80 06:15   42  18 60  30  44 74 06:30   42  23 65  18  30 48 06:45 45 181 15 72 60 253 20 99 32 155 52 254 07:00   66  25 91  20  18 38 07:15   76  25 101  12  9 21 07:30   98  21 119  16  13 29 07:45 69 309 35 106 104 415 14 62 18 58 32 120 08:00   74  48 122  8  15 23 08:15   51  42 93  14  14 28 08:30   44  37 81  13  17 30 08:45 38 207 30 157 68 364 14 49 10 56 24 105 09:00   26  31 57  15  12 27 09:15   29  13 42  9  12 21 09:30   29  24 53  13  10 23 09:45 23 107 19 87 42 194 4 41 13 47 17 88 10:00   15  17 32  3  9 12 10:15   31  27 58  6  10 16 10:30   21  23 44  3  11 14 10:45 30 97 22 89 52 186 3 15 5 35 8 50 11:00   22  25 47  3  11 14 11:15   29  17 46  2  8 10 11:30   27  17 44  9  10 19 11:45 22 100 18 77 40 177 5 19 6 35 11 54 TOTALS 1126 663 1789 1112 1301 2413 SPLIT %62.9% 37.1%42.6%46.1% 53.9%57.4% NB SB EB WB 00 2,238 1,964 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:45 07:15 14:15 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 317 162 446 165 257 406 Pk Hr Factor 0.809 0.844 0.914 0.917 0.834 0.868 7 ‐ 9 Volume 00516 263 779 00275 451 726 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:45 07:15 16:15 16:30 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 317 162 446 0 0 162 257 406  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.809 0.844 0.914 0.000 0.000 0.920 0.834 0.868 VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 10/20/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 Gene Autry Wy W/O Chris Ln 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 4,202 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 4,202 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1262_001 NB SB EB WB 00 2,278 1,959 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   4  2 6  21  25 46 00:15   6  5 11  23  22 45 00:30   1  3 4  29  20 49 00:45 1 12 4 14 5 26 2699188544184 01:00   4  2 6  18  26 44 01:15   2  1 3  30  22 52 01:30   0  1 1  22  24 46 01:45 1704111 36106259761203 02:00   0  1 1  34  17 51 02:15   1  2 3  42  25 67 02:30   2  0 2  30  29 59 02:45 3647713 441503510679256 03:00   1  1 2  35  57 92 03:15   6  2 8  36  30 66 03:30   1  0 1  38  51 89 03:45 4 12 2 5 6 17 47 156 41 179 88 335 04:00   3  4 7  35  57 92 04:15   10  4 14  43  47 90 04:30   6  5 11  35  75 110 04:45 8 27 3 16 11 43 46 159 55 234 101 393 05:00   10  6 16  39  72 111 05:15   17  10 27  31  80 111 05:30   21  6 27  25  63 88 05:45 23 71 6 28 29 99 27 122 51 266 78 388 06:00   47  21 68  28  46 74 06:15   55  12 67  32  39 71 06:30   50  16 66  18  39 57 06:45 43 195 36 85 79 280 24 102 21 145 45 247 07:00   76  26 102  19  25 44 07:15   94  30 124  24  15 39 07:30   116  29 145  14  22 36 07:45 67 353 35 120 102 473 15 72 20 82 35 154 08:00   52  33 85  19  21 40 08:15   51  17 68  9  7 16 08:30   45  21 66  20  12 32 08:45 25 173 26 97 51 270 19 67 11 51 30 118 09:00   17  18 35  18  22 40 09:15   27  28 55  6  11 17 09:30   29  25 54  11  9 20 09:45 21 94 22 93 43 187 8 43 8 50 16 93 10:00   20  14 34  9  12 21 10:15   19  11 30  8  7 15 10:30   26  11 37  3  6 9 10:45 32 97 20 56 52 153 5 25 9 34 14 59 11:00   31  21 52  5  4 9 11:15   30  10 40  4  12 16 11:30   24  25 49  3  7 10 11:45 30 115 21 77 51 192 3 15 5 28 8 43 TOTALS 1162 602 1764 1116 1357 2473 SPLIT %65.9% 34.1%41.6%45.1% 54.9%58.4% NB SB EB WB 00 2,278 1,959 AM Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:00 15:30 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 353 127 473 163 282 433 Pk Hr Factor 0.761 0.907 0.816 0.867 0.881 0.975 7 ‐ 9 Volume 00526 217 743 00281 500 781 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:00 16:15 16:30 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 353 127 473 0 0 163 282 433  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.761 0.907 0.816 0.000 0.000 0.886 0.881 0.975 Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS Total 4,237 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME Gene Autry Wy W/O Chris Ln Wednesday 10/21/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 4,237 Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 6 2 _ 0 0 1 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 10 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 5 Ge n e  Au t r y  Wy  W/ O  Ch r i s  Ln Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 6 2 _ 0 0 1 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 10 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D Ge n e  Au t r y  Wy  W/ O  Ch r i s  Ln 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 40 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1262_002 NB SB EB WB 00 2,056 2,154 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   1  6 7  19  31 50 00:15   1  3 4  27  26 53 00:30   0  3 3  31  18 49 00:45 3 5 1 13 4 18 32 109 26 101 58 210 01:00   2  5 7  27  24 51 01:15   2  3 5  21  11 32 01:30   1  3 4  27  25 52 01:45 1 6 4 15 5 21 26 101 29 89 55 190 02:00   2  0 2  25  31 56 02:15   3  0 3  37  23 60 02:30   0  0 0  41  36 77 02:45 051116 411443812879272 03:00   0  1 1  40  41 81 03:15   3  1 4  39  28 67 03:30   2  3 5  32  41 73 03:45 5 10 0 5 5 15 47 158 46 156 93 314 04:00   6  1 7  23  37 60 04:15   6  2 8  43  36 79 04:30   5  1 6  35  54 89 04:45 5 22 3 7 8 29 41 142 41 168 82 310 05:00   7  7 14  33  69 102 05:15   14  13 27  25  66 91 05:30   12  14 26  37  48 85 05:45 16 49 35 69 51 118 22 117 52 235 74 352 06:00   27  46 73  30  45 75 06:15   36  49 85  24  44 68 06:30   34  44 78  14  25 39 06:45 43 140 29 168 72 308 16 84 33 147 49 231 07:00   66  25 91  16  12 28 07:15   73  30 103  11  13 24 07:30   98  24 122  14  15 29 07:45 68 305 38 117 106 422 11 52 17 57 28 109 08:00   72  57 129  9  16 25 08:15   50  52 102  14  12 26 08:30   45  44 89  12  17 29 08:45 34 201 42 195 76 396 12 47 10 55 22 102 09:00   21  38 59  15  12 27 09:15   36  21 57  8  14 22 09:30   26  38 64  13  10 23 09:45 22 105 24 121 46 226 4 40 13 49 17 89 10:00   16  22 38  5  9 14 10:15   22  27 49  6  12 18 10:30   18  20 38  2  10 12 10:45 28 84 32 101 60 185 2 15 10 41 12 56 11:00   22  23 45  3  10 13 11:15   28  21 49  1  7 8 11:30   25  18 43  7  5 12 11:45 24 99 28 90 52 189 5 16 4 26 9 42 TOTALS 1031 902 1933 1025 1252 2277 SPLIT %53.3% 46.7%45.9%45.0% 55.0%54.1% NB SB EB WB 00 2,056 2,154 AM Peak Hour 07:15 08:00 07:15 14:30 17:00 16:30 AM Pk Volume 311 195 460 161 235 364 Pk Hr Factor 0.793 0.855 0.891 0.982 0.851 0.892 7 ‐ 9 Volume 00506 312 818 00259 403 662 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 08:00 07:15 16:15 17:00 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 311 195 460 0 0 152 235 364  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.793 0.855 0.891 0.000 0.000 0.884 0.851 0.892 VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 10/20/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 Gene Autry Wy W/O State College Blvd 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 4,210 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 4,210 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1262_002 NB SB EB WB 00 2,089 2,165 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   3  3 6  18  30 48 00:15   5  5 10  24  31 55 00:30   1  2 3  26  35 61 00:45 0 9 4 14 4 23 25 93 30 126 55 219 01:00   3  2 5  13  27 40 01:15   2  0 2  31  25 56 01:30   1  0 1  22  31 53 01:45 1713210 33993411767216 02:00   0  1 1  29  25 54 02:15   2  3 5  36  27 63 02:30   1  1 2  30  36 66 02:45 3638614 441393412278261 03:00   1  1 2  37  47 84 03:15   6  2 8  40  22 62 03:30   1  0 1  30  46 76 03:45 4 12 2 5 6 17 46 153 39 154 85 307 04:00   4  5 9  34  46 80 04:15   6  4 10  37  45 82 04:30   5  2 7  30  66 96 04:45 6 21 4 15 10 36 45 146 51 208 96 354 05:00   7  6 13  31  69 100 05:15   18  17 35  30  75 105 05:30   13  18 31  26  58 84 05:45 11 49 38 79 49 128 25 112 50 252 75 364 06:00   29  52 81  27  46 73 06:15   45  43 88  28  37 65 06:30   41  29 70  15  36 51 06:45 44 159 50 174 94 333 21 91 19 138 40 229 07:00   77  31 108  17  22 39 07:15   95  35 130  17  16 33 07:30   110  29 139  16  18 34 07:45 57 339 39 134 96 473 14 64 18 74 32 138 08:00   50  36 86  23  21 44 08:15   50  28 78  7  11 18 08:30   40  27 67  14  12 26 08:45 27 167 25 116 52 283 20 64 10 54 30 118 09:00   15  24 39  17  21 38 09:15   23  33 56  5  10 15 09:30   20  26 46  11  8 19 09:45 23 81 23 106 46 187 8 41 9 48 17 89 10:00   18  13 31  8  11 19 10:15   19  14 33  5  6 11 10:30   24  11 35  4  5 9 10:45 28 89 24 62 52 151 5 22 9 31 14 53 11:00   30  20 50  3  4 7 11:15   32  17 49  3  11 14 11:30   21  31 52  3  7 10 11:45 30 113 32 100 62 213 4 13 3 25 7 38 TOTALS 1052 816 1868 1037 1349 2386 SPLIT %56.3% 43.7%43.9%43.5% 56.5%56.1% NB SB EB WB 00 2,089 2,165 AM Peak Hour 07:00 06:00 07:00 15:00 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 339 174 473 153 261 397 Pk Hr Factor 0.770 0.837 0.851 0.832 0.870 0.945 7 ‐ 9 Volume 00506 250 756 00258 460 718 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:00 07:15 07:00 16:00 16:30 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 339 139 473 0 0 146 261 397  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.770 0.891 0.851 0.000 0.000 0.811 0.870 0.945 Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS Total 4,254 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME Gene Autry Wy W/O State College Blvd Wednesday 10/21/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 4,254 Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 6 2 _ 0 0 2 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 10 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 5 Ge n e  Au t r y  Wy  W/ O  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 6 2 _ 0 0 2 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 10 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D Ge n e  Au t r y  Wy  W/ O  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d 050 10 0 15 0 20 0 25 0 30 0 35 0 40 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1262_003 NB SB EB WB 00 11,500 11,732 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   28  26 54  153  159 312 00:15   20  25 45  158  147 305 00:30   21  24 45  163  131 294 00:45 18 87 14 89 32 176 159 633 168 605 327 1238 01:00   13  18 31  128  140 268 01:15   10  21 31  146  158 304 01:30   8  12 20  125  180 305 01:45 15 46 8 59 23 105 160 559 188 666 348 1225 02:00   7  19 26  146  157 303 02:15   16  11 27  148  151 299 02:30   10  10 20  162  209 371 02:45 8 41 14 54 22 95 162 618 229 746 391 1364 03:00   8  9 17  150  188 338 03:15   11  10 21  152  232 384 03:30   26  19 45  167  274 441 03:45 27 72 13 51 40 123 162 631 260 954 422 1585 04:00   23  19 42  154  285 439 04:15   34  14 48  158  280 438 04:30   76  21 97  186  332 518 04:45 98 231 31 85 129 316 188 686 296 1193 484 1879 05:00   61  47 108  211  386 597 05:15   75  48 123  178  354 532 05:30   160  43 203  164  324 488 05:45 173 469 59 197 232 666 147 700 270 1334 417 2034 06:00   145  61 206  172  265 437 06:15   140  75 215  123  213 336 06:30   245  87 332  136  212 348 06:45 274 804 101 324 375 1128 114 545 165 855 279 1400 07:00   262  109 371  126  169 295 07:15   301  134 435  79  153 232 07:30   302  135 437  102  121 223 07:45 368 1233 166 544 534 1777 91 398 115 558 206 956 08:00   330  183 513  101  105 206 08:15   315  177 492  82  104 186 08:30   249  155 404  75  95 170 08:45 226 1120 182 697 408 1817 91 349 98 402 189 751 09:00   179  124 303  73  90 163 09:15   174  138 312  69  93 162 09:30   150  132 282  57  85 142 09:45 133 636 149 543 282 1179 72 271 77 345 149 616 10:00   112  122 234  69  75 144 10:15   115  113 228  59  75 134 10:30   98  94 192  63  53 116 10:45 115 440 119 448 234 888 60 251 51 254 111 505 11:00   110  125 235  46  55 101 11:15   119  139 258  32  42 74 11:30   167  149 316  34  34 68 11:45 129 525 158 571 287 1096 43 155 27 158 70 313 TOTALS 5704 3662 9366 5796 8070 13866 SPLIT %60.9% 39.1%40.3%41.8% 58.2%59.7% NB SB EB WB 00 11,500 11,732 AM Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 AM Pk Volume 1315 697 1976 763 1368 2131 Pk Hr Factor 0.893 0.952 0.925 0.904 0.886 0.892 7 ‐ 9 Volume 002353 1241 3594 001386 2527 3913 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:30 08:00 07:30 16:30 16:30 16:30 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1315 697 1976 0 0 763 1368 2131  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.893 0.952 0.925 0.000 0.000 0.904 0.886 0.892 VOLUME Prepared by NDS/ATD 13:15 13:30 13:45 12:00 12:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 16:15 16:30 14:00 14:15 14:30 10/20/2015 14:45 15:00 DAILY TOTALS PM Period 16:45 17:00 17:15 Tuesday 17:30 17:45 15:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 18:00 18:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 Orangewood Ave Bet. State College Blvd & Cypress St 21:30 21:45 22:00 Total 23,232 19:30 19:45 20:00 20:15 DAILY TOTALS 22:15 22:30 22:45 23:00 23:15 23:30 TOTAL 23:45 TOTALS Total 23,232 DAILY TOTALS 21:00 21:15 20:30 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume SPLIT % TOTAL Pk Hr Factor PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 20:45 Day:City:Anaheim Date:Project #:CA15_1262_003 NB SB EB WB 00 11,548 11,724 AM Period NB SB  EB  WB NB  SB  EB  WB 00:00   29  44 73  151  140 291 00:15   10  29 39  134  150 284 00:30   24  27 51  166  138 304 00:45 13 76 23 123 36 199 155 606 160 588 315 1194 01:00   13  27 40  150  170 320 01:15   15  17 32  152  137 289 01:30   16  12 28  136  195 331 01:45 13 57 11 67 24 124 164 602 171 673 335 1275 02:00   9  24 33  141  165 306 02:15   14  12 26  159  164 323 02:30   10  16 26  184  205 389 02:45 10 43 7 59 17 102 168 652 215 749 383 1401 03:00   9  3 12  144  236 380 03:15   15  6 21  154  214 368 03:30   30  17 47  149  263 412 03:45 24 78 10 36 34 114 153 600 200 913 353 1513 04:00   25  16 41  144  326 470 04:15   34  23 57  151  315 466 04:30   80  19 99  158  317 475 04:45 103 242 34 92 137 334 168 621 317 1275 485 1896 05:00   69  37 106  201  422 623 05:15   86  52 138  186  373 559 05:30   149  58 207  199  330 529 05:45 175 479 52 199 227 678 140 726 285 1410 425 2136 06:00   156  54 210  168  292 460 06:15   166  69 235  155  193 348 06:30   217  75 292  155  184 339 06:45 268 807 102 300 370 1107 118 596 170 839 288 1435 07:00   278  98 376  121  144 265 07:15   335  131 466  103  150 253 07:30   374  156 530  101  102 203 07:45 358 1345 189 574 547 1919 85 410 98 494 183 904 08:00   306  160 466  94  90 184 08:15   255  182 437  71  104 175 08:30   253  134 387  82  103 185 08:45 251 1065 200 676 451 1741 89 336 99 396 188 732 09:00   156  144 300  98  86 184 09:15   173  141 314  81  90 171 09:30   123  120 243  68  87 155 09:45 133 585 115 520 248 1105 74 321 66 329 140 650 10:00   115  100 215  48  89 137 10:15   102  113 215  49  80 129 10:30   97  104 201  44  64 108 10:45 124 438 113 430 237 868 39 180 51 284 90 464 11:00   120  104 224  30  68 98 11:15   133  126 259  39  41 80 11:30   126  134 260  43  43 86 11:45 163 542 153 517 316 1059 29 141 29 181 58 322 TOTALS 5757 3593 9350 5791 8131 13922 SPLIT %61.6% 38.4%40.2%41.6% 58.4%59.8% NB SB EB WB 00 11,548 11,724 AM Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45 AM Pk Volume 1373 687 2009 754 1442 2196 Pk Hr Factor 0.918 0.909 0.918 0.938 0.854 0.881 7 ‐ 9 Volume 002410 1250 3660 001347 2685 4032 7 ‐ 9 Peak Hour 07:15 07:30 07:15 16:45 16:45 16:45 7 ‐ 9 Pk Volume 0 0 1373 687 2009 0 0 754 1442 2196  Pk Hr Factor 0.000 0.000 0.918 0.909 0.918 0.000 0.000 0.938 0.854 0.881 Pk Hr Factor 4 ‐ 6 Volume 4 ‐ 6 Peak Hour 4 ‐ 6 Pk Volume Pk Hr Factor DAILY TOTALS DAILY TOTALS Total 23,272 PM Peak Hour PM Pk Volume 23:00 23:15 23:30 23:45 TOTALS SPLIT % 21:30 21:45 22:00 22:15 22:30 22:45 20:00 20:15 20:30 20:45 21:00 21:15 18:30 18:45 19:00 19:15 19:30 19:45 17:00 17:15 17:30 17:45 18:00 18:15 15:30 15:45 16:00 16:15 16:30 16:45 14:00 14:15 14:30 14:45 15:00 15:15 12:30 12:45 13:00 13:15 13:30 13:45 TOTAL PM Period TOTAL 12:00 12:15 Prepared by NDS/ATD VOLUME Orangewood Ave Bet. State College Blvd & Cypress St Wednesday 10/21/2015 DAILY TOTALS Total 23,272 Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 6 2 _ 0 0 3 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 10 / 2 0 / 2 0 1 5 Or a n g e w o o d  Av e  Be t .  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  & Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D 0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Pr o j e c t  #: CA 1 5 _ 1 2 6 2 _ 0 0 3 Ci t y : An a h e i m Lo c a t i o n : D a t e : 10 / 2 1 / 2 0 1 5 Pr e p a r e d  by  ND S / A T D Or a n g e w o o d  Av e  Be t .  St a t e  Co l l e g e  Bl v d  &  0 20 0 40 0 60 0 80 0 10 0 0 12 0 0 14 0 0 16 0 0 0 0 : 0 0 0 1 : 0 0 0 2 : 0 0 0 3 : 0 0 0 4 : 0 0 0 5 : 0 0 0 6 : 0 0 0 7 : 0 0 0 8 : 0 0 0 9 : 0 0 1 0 : 0 0 1 1 : 0 0 1 2 : 0 0 1 3 : 0 0 1 4 : 0 0 1 5 : 0 0 1 6 : 0 0 1 7 : 0 0 1 8 : 0 0 1 9 : 0 0 2 0 : 0 0 2 1 : 0 0 22:00 23:00 V e h i c l e s NB SB EB WB Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -60- Appendix B – Existing A.M./P.M. Peak Hour Intersection Counts Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.501.5221031230 7:00 AM 8 0 73 4 16 1 0 134 102 31 202 0 571 00007:15 AM 3 0 94 12 39 0 0 207 126 36 218 0 735 00007:30 AM 2 0 120 13 45 4 0 198 123 34 186 0 725 00007:45 AM 10 0 116 13 35 4 0 217 84 44 227 0 750 10008:00 AM 10 0 126 7 27 2 0 174 95 40 237 0 718 10008:15 AM 10 0 102 10 32 5 0 149 67 30 277 0 682 00008:30 AM 12 0 95 8 17 4 0 142 71 25 222 0 596 00008:45 AM 11 0 110 7 11 7 0 123 66 43 198 0 576 0001 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:66 0 836 74 222 27 0 1344 734 283 1767 0 5353 2001APPROACH %'s:7.32% 0.00% 92.68% 22.91% 68.73% 8.36% 0.00% 64.68% 35.32% 13.80% 86.20% 0.00%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :25 0 456 45 146 10 0 796 428 154 868 0 2928 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.976 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.810 0.9190.884 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-001 Anaheim EASTBOUND I-5 SB Ramps I-5 SB Ramps AM Katella Ave Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.922 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.501.5221031230 4:00 PM 6 0 46 13 8 1 0 140 111 85 355 0 765 00004:15 PM 9 0 58 11 15 1 0 151 106 65 350 0 766 00004:30 PM 5 0 78 11 10 2 0 182 105 86 392 0 871 00034:45 PM 11 0 57 6 18 4 0 175 124 84 380 0 859 00065:00 PM 16 0 56 9 15 3 0 145 102 92 491 0 929 10005:15 PM 4 0 61 10 16 3 0 229 123 82 413 0 941 00005:30 PM 11 0 63 10 24 4 0 176 142 76 401 0 907 00015:45 PM 9 0 59 11 14 1 0 157 105 63 314 0 733 1001 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:71 0 478 81 120 19 0 1355 918 633 3096 0 6771 2 0 0 11APPROACH %'s :12.93% 0.00% 87.07% 36.82% 54.55% 8.64% 0.00% 59.61% 40.39% 16.98% 83.02% 0.00%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :42 0 237 35 73 14 0 725 491 334 1685 0 3636 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.966 CONTROL: 0.866 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.803 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM I-5 SB Ramps I-5 SB Ramps 0.8640.943 Project ID:15-1223-001 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 122 City: AM 10 146 45 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 14 73 35 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 0000 868 0 1685 3 0 000 154 0 334 2 3 796 0 725 1 428 0 491 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 25 0 456 AM NOON 000NOON PM 42 0 237 PM 1.5 0 1.5 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 903 0 1741 1022 0 2019 1224 0 1216 1297 0 997 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 1177279 201 898 728 0 South Leg 29572127 0 East Leg North Leg 122 2319 1209 0 South Leg East Leg 481 00 0122 West Leg 0 West Leg 3016 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 728 0 898 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 201 0 6:00 PM 0 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-001 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h I-5 SB Ramps and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 997 0 0 0 Signalized CONTROL 445 PM 903 0 1741 I- 5 S B R a m p s AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1297 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.530.500023003.51.5 7:00 AM 86 85 58 0 0 0 16 195 0 0 180 12 632 00707:15 AM 86 98 57 0 0 0 18 285 0 0 215 13 772 00407:30 AM 81 92 66 0 0 0 15 334 0 0 208 15 811 00407:45 AM 100 127 70 0 0 0 21 317 0 0 200 22 857 00508:00 AM 83 97 68 0 0 0 24 291 0 0 248 15 826 0 0 14 08:15 AM 114 100 74 0 0 0 19 231 0 0 221 13 772 00508:30 AM 93 76 50 0 0 0 24 233 0 0 201 9 686 0 0 15 08:45 AM 96 99 81 0 0 0 34 196 0 0 199 21 726 0 0 18 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:739 774 524 0 0 0 171 2082 0 0 1672 120 6082 0 0 72 0APPROACH %'s:36.28% 38.00% 25.72% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 7.59% 92.41% 0.00% 0.00% 93.30% 6.70%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :730 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :378 416 278 0 0 0 79 1173 0 0 877 65 3266 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.953 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.000 0.8970.902 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-002 Anaheim EASTBOUND I-5 NB Ramps/S Anaheim Way I-5 NB Ramps/S Anaheim Way AM Katella Ave Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.895 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.530.500023003.51.5 4:00 PM 127 190 35 0 0 0 24 179 0 0 416 32 1003 0 0 14 04:15 PM 137 239 26 0 0 0 29 182 0 0 405 36 1054 0 0 17 04:30 PM 129 202 28 0 0 0 31 251 0 0 418 43 1102 0 0 20 04:45 PM 140 282 19 0 0 0 21 215 0 0 386 49 1112 0 0 11 05:00 PM 158 331 23 0 0 0 22 203 0 0 497 45 1279 0 0 15 05:15 PM 152 386 22 0 0 0 30 261 0 0 448 52 1351 0 0 20 05:30 PM 148 332 16 0 0 0 26 231 0 0 404 55 1212 0 0 16 05:45 PM 158 281 18 0 0 0 38 190 0 0 328 46 1059 0 0 15 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:1149 2243 187 0 0 0 221 1712 0 0 3302 358 9172 0 0 128 0APPROACH %'s :32.10% 62.67% 5.22% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 11.43% 88.57% 0.00% 0.00% 90.22% 9.78%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :598 1331 80 0 0 0 99 910 0 0 1735 201 4954 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.917 CONTROL: 0.893 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM I-5 NB Ramps/S Anaheim Way I-5 NB Ramps/S Anaheim Way 0.8670.897 Project ID:15-1223-002 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 000 City: AM 000 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 000 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 65 0 201 1.5 877 0 1735 3.5 2 79 0 99 0000 3 1173 0 910 0 000 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 378 416 278 AM NOON 000NOON PM 598 1331 80 PM 1.5 3 0.5 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 1255 0 2333 942 0 1936 1252 0 1009 1451 0 990 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 20092009 0 0 0 0 South Leg 33422507 0 East Leg North Leg 1631 2393 1072 0 South Leg East Leg 1072 00 16310 West Leg 0 West Leg 2926 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 0 0 0 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 560 0 6:00 PM 560 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-002 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h I-5 NB Ramps/S Anaheim Way and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 990 560 0 1631 Signalized CONTROL 445 PM 1255 0 2333 I- 5 N B R a m p s / S An a h e i m W a y AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1451 0 730 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:10.50.5111130131 7:00 AM 10 17 11 10 0 49 74 186 6 7 137 21 528 00617:15 AM 6 19 6 7 2 37 106 247 1 2 176 19 628 00907:30 AM 7 23 4 18 1 49 84 293 7 0 148 14 648 00607:45 AM 8 15 3 21 5 60 77 305 9 7 150 23 683 00918:00 AM 3 21 2 22 5 70 82 268 15 11 176 14 689 00428:15 AM 0 17 9 14 1 39 65 239 7 11 183 23 608 00768:30 AM 0 11 5 21 8 37 67 208 7 8 168 8 548 0 0 12 38:45 AM 5 10 3 10 1 30 45 218 7 7 179 19 534 0041 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:39 133 43 123 23 371 600 1964 59 53 1317 141 4866 0 0 57 14APPROACH %'s:18.14% 61.86% 20.00% 23.79% 4.45% 71.76% 22.87% 74.88% 2.25% 3.51% 87.16% 9.33%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :24 78 15 68 13 216 349 1113 32 20 650 70 2648 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.961 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.765 0.9550.860 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-003 Anaheim EASTBOUND Lewis St Lewis St AM Katella Ave Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.920 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:10.50.5111130131 4:00 PM 8 17 8 13 2 116 41 184 2 1 300 11 703 00314:15 PM 9 22 14 26 2 105 54 152 8 0 351 9 752 00904:30 PM 6 11 10 24 0 100 38 230 1 7 325 13 765 00714:45 PM 11 25 10 6 0 105 33 210 0 3 346 13 762 00015:00 PM 8 26 13 20 1 130 37 182 2 17 385 10 831 00175:15 PM 1 34 5 8 0 78 35 236 0 7 422 8 834 00115:30 PM 7 24 2 8 0 71 48 203 3 5 344 15 730 0 0 11 45:45 PM 6 42 10 13 0 76 34 187 0 0 309 9 686 0010 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:56 201 72 118 5 781 320 1584 16 40 2782 88 6063 0 0 33 15APPROACH %'s :17.02% 61.09% 21.88% 13.05% 0.55% 86.39% 16.67% 82.50% 0.83% 1.37% 95.60% 3.02%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :26 96 38 58 1 413 143 858 3 34 1478 44 3192 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.957 CONTROL: 0.890 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.781 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM Lewis St Lewis St 0.9260.851 Project ID:15-1223-003 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 111 City: AM 216 13 68 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 413 1 58 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 70 0 44 1 650 0 1478 3 1 349 0 143 20 0 34 1 3 1113 0 858 0 32 0 3 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 24 78 15 AM NOON 000NOON PM 26 96 38 PM 10.50.5Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 890 0 1917 740 0 1556 1494 0 1004 1196 0 954 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 198160 297 38 65 0 South Leg 29212384 0 East Leg North Leg 755 1936 182 0 South Leg East Leg 117 00 283472 West Leg 0 West Leg 2510 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 65 0 38 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 794 0 6:00 PM 497 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-003 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Lewis St and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 954 497 0 283 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 890 0 1917 Le w i s S t AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1196 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:23123123.51.5231 7:00 AM 30 112 43 23 234 29 34 144 23 74 109 4 859 121457:15 AM 20 193 41 31 304 31 54 203 26 81 141 10 1135 8 0 13 77:30 AM 39 135 57 32 301 28 43 222 34 102 111 11 1115 150637:45 AM 22 175 61 30 348 30 65 226 59 121 116 4 1257 100868:00 AM 33 130 64 40 260 28 54 195 33 115 161 10 1123 170758:15 AM 26 140 60 30 242 20 54 190 34 89 156 5 1046 100978:30 AM 37 105 59 40 246 31 48 150 29 86 135 11 977 150378:45 AM 25 104 39 27 199 32 39 167 27 69 142 13 883 10 1 12 10 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:232 1094 424 253 2134 229 391 1497 265 737 1071 68 8395 97 2 62 50APPROACH %'s:13.26% 62.51% 24.23% 9.67% 81.57% 8.75% 18.16% 69.53% 12.31% 39.29% 57.09% 3.62%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :114 633 223 133 1213 117 216 846 152 419 529 35 4630 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.921 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.896 0.8670.940 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-004 Anaheim EASTBOUND State College Blvd State College Blvd AM Katella Ave Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.859 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:23123123.51.5231 4:00 PM 49 193 59 24 180 39 40 137 35 44 291 30 1121 12 2 10 34:15 PM 33 204 65 18 159 40 30 127 33 87 268 19 1083 718104:30 PM 41 192 73 21 205 36 52 176 41 92 276 21 1226 11 2 12 144:45 PM 51 229 65 22 204 31 36 162 22 86 292 19 1219 12 0 11 115:00 PM 71 221 86 24 290 58 42 169 32 84 335 15 1427 150765:15 PM 69 245 82 30 232 44 37 167 29 103 308 18 1364 18 2 13 135:30 PM 48 241 59 21 192 41 51 144 29 92 281 17 1216 12 0 12 175:45 PM 50 198 66 29 162 27 42 155 14 106 206 17 1072 13 0 10 19 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:412 1723 555 189 1624 316 330 1237 235 694 2257 156 9728 100 7 83 93APPROACH %'s :15.32% 64.05% 20.63% 8.88% 76.28% 14.84% 18.31% 68.65% 13.04% 22.34% 72.64% 5.02%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :232 887 306 97 931 169 167 674 124 365 1211 73 5236 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.917 CONTROL: 0.950 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.804 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM State College Blvd State College Blvd 0.8970.900 Project ID:15-1223-004 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 132 City: AM 117 1213 133 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 169 931 97 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 35 0 73 1 529 0 1211 3 2 216 0 167 419 0 365 2 3.5 846 0 674 1.5 152 0 124 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 114 633 223 AM NOON 000NOON PM 232 887 306 PM 231Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 760 0 1612 983 0 1649 1214 0 965 1202 0 1077 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 28451425 1463 1420 1784 0 South Leg 25771974 0 East Leg North Leg 2324 2185 2754 0 South Leg East Leg 970 00 11271197 West Leg 0 West Leg 2726 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1784 0 1420 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 2347 0 6:00 PM 884 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-004 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h State College Blvd and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 1077 884 0 1127 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 760 0 1612 St a t e C o l l e g e B l v d AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1202 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:10.51.5111131131 7:00 AM 110809181961216531 432 00807:15 AM 1 0 0 19 0 17 21 266 5 1 211 27 568 0 0 12 07:30 AM 2009018263236418827 603 0 0 13 17:45 AM 0 0 0 15 0 15 26 342 6 2 221 42 669 0 0 13 08:00 AM 3037021222496224042 595 0 0 12 08:15 AM 10113015212642 1 223 25 566 0 0 13 18:30 AM 1 1 1 10 0 13 18 263 6 1 201 25 540 0 0 10 08:45 AM 3017212162375320022 508 0 0 13 0 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:12 2 6 88 2 120 168 2140 37 16 1649 241 4481 0 0 94 2APPROACH %'s:60.00% 10.00% 30.00% 41.90% 0.95% 57.14% 7.16% 91.26% 1.58% 0.84% 86.52% 12.64%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :6 0 3 50 0 71 95 1180 23 9 860 138 2435 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.910 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.840 0.8680.375 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-005 Anaheim EASTBOUND Sportstown Sportstown AM Katella Ave Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.886 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:10.51.5111131131 4:00 PM 21980712212223636 624 00904:15 PM 1 0 3 16 0 30 10 192 3 0 313 9 577 00504:30 PM 6 1 2 32 0 19 14 251 12 9 368 18 732 0 0 10 14:45 PM 11 0 1 23 2 25 11 252 6 3 337 18 689 00605:00 PM 2 0 1 30 0 31 10 257 3 4 414 14 766 00515:15 PM 8 1 3 34 0 37 16 286 2 3 357 20 767 0 0 11 05:30 PM 10 1 5 23 1 39 8 209 4 5 357 9 671 00415:45 PM 8 0 5 12 0 11 14 246 3 7 294 8 608 0060 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:48 4 29 178 3 199 95 1905 35 33 2803 102 5434 0 0 56 3APPROACH %'s :59.26% 4.94% 35.80% 46.84% 0.79% 52.37% 4.67% 93.61% 1.72% 1.12% 95.41% 3.47%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :27 2 7 119 2 112 51 1046 23 19 1476 70 2954 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.963 CONTROL: 0.906 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.820 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM Sportstown Sportstown 0.9210.750 Project ID:15-1223-005 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 111 City: AM 71050 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 112 2 119 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 138 0 70 1 860 0 1476 3 1 95 0 51 90191 3 1180 0 1046 1 23 0 23 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 603AM NOON 000NOON PM 27 2 7 PM 10.51.5Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 937 0 1615 1007 0 1565 1298 0 1120 1233 0 1172 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 8036 121 44 32 0 South Leg 27352235 0 East Leg North Leg 356 2240 41 0 South Leg East Leg 9 00 123233 West Leg 0 West Leg 2737 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 32 0 44 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 354 0 6:00 PM 233 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-005 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Sportstown and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 1172 233 0 123 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 937 0 1615 Sp o r t s t o w n AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1233 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0001.501.5031031 7:00 AM 0 0 0 45 0 92 1 180 72 0 169 60 619 00107:15 AM 0 0 0 35 0 83 0 241 108 0 234 58 759 00007:30 AM 0 0 0 29 0 83 0 292 84 0 236 90 814 00007:45 AM 0 0 0 54 0 105 0 275 74 0 264 50 822 00008:00 AM 0 0 0 38 0 128 0 251 68 0 261 60 806 00008:15 AM 0 0 0 33 0 100 0 200 56 0 237 48 674 00008:30 AM 0 0 0 46 0 82 0 227 55 0 211 109 730 00008:45 AM 0 0 0 47 0 129 0 200 71 0 194 86 727 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 0 0 327 0 802 1 1866 588 0 1806 561 5951 0010APPROACH %'s:#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 28.96% 0.00% 71.04% 0.04% 76.01% 23.95% 0.00% 76.30% 23.70%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 156 0 399 0 1059 334 0 995 258 3201 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.974 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.836 0.9260.000 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-006 Anaheim EASTBOUND SR-57 SB Ramps SR-57 SB Ramps AM Katella Ave Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.961 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0001.501.5031031 4:00 PM 0 0 0 41 0 116 0 223 83 0 334 169 966 00004:15 PM 0 0 0 47 0 129 0 214 71 0 258 150 869 00004:30 PM 0 0 0 52 0 121 0 245 98 0 279 215 1010 00004:45 PM 0 0 0 42 0 126 0 254 84 0 257 165 928 00005:00 PM 0 0 0 42 0 135 0 287 138 0 303 220 1125 00005:15 PM 0 0 0 34 0 126 0 281 91 0 285 156 973 00005:30 PM 0 0 0 23 0 126 0 223 86 0 292 98 848 00005:45 PM 0 0 0 35 0 127 0 214 62 0 249 99 786 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 0 0 316 0 1006 0 1941 713 0 2257 1272 7505 0000APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 23.90% 0.00% 76.10% 0.00% 73.13% 26.87% 0.00% 63.96% 36.04%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 170 0 508 0 1067 411 0 1124 756 4036 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.897 CONTROL: 0.899 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.958 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM SR-57 SB Ramps SR-57 SB Ramps 0.8690.000 Project ID:15-1223-006 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 1.5 0 1.5 City: AM 399 0 156 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 508 0 170 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 258 0 756 1 995 0 1124 3 0 000 0000 3 1059 0 1067 1 334 0 411 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 000AM NOON 000NOON PM 000PM 000Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 1394 0 1632 1253 0 1880 1393 0 1478 1215 0 1237 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 4110 555 411 334 0 South Leg 31102787 0 East Leg North Leg 1434 2468 334 0 South Leg East Leg 0 00 756678 West Leg 0 West Leg 3117 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 334 0 411 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 813 0 6:00 PM 258 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-006 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h SR-57 SB Ramps and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 1237 258 0 756 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 1394 0 1632 SR - 5 7 S B R a m p s AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1215 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.501.5000231040 7:00 AM 71098000014763015322 554 00007:15 AM 881127000220087020528 738 00207:30 AM 7501370000197121024532 807 00007:45 AM 1060161000125380021328 842 00108:00 AM 950150000019094022027 776 00008:15 AM 810137000016874020424 688 00008:30 AM 870115000017382022546 728 00008:45 AM 77 0 144 000019768020735 728 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:680 1 1069 00031525 669 0 1672 242 5861 0030APPROACH %'s:38.86% 0.06% 61.09% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.14% 69.41% 30.45% 0.00% 87.36% 12.64%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :364 1575000384038208831153163 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.939 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.000 0.9170.880 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-007 Anaheim EASTBOUND SR-57 NB Ramps SR-57 NB Ramps AM Katella Ave Signalized UTURNS Katella Ave 0.901 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.501.5000231040 4:00 PM 641930000169105044593 970 00004:15 PM 74081000016284032965 795 00004:30 PM 510720001205106044778 960 00104:45 PM 490500001177112035659 804 00105:00 PM 4604700002071280485941007 00005:15 PM 580440000166133037481 856 00005:30 PM 63039000017587033349 746 00005:45 PM 75052000116577026355 688 0010 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:480147800031426832 0 3032 574 6826 0030APPROACH %'s :50.05% 0.10% 49.84% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.13% 63.07% 36.80% 0.00% 84.08% 15.92%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :204 0213000275547901662 312 3627 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.900 CONTROL: 0.852 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 Signalized Katella AveNS/EW Streets:Katella Ave PM SR-57 NB Ramps SR-57 NB Ramps 0.9220.848 Project ID:15-1223-007 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 000 City: AM 000 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 000 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 115 0 312 0 883 0 1662 4 2 302 0000 3 840 0 755 1 382 0 479 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 364 1 575 AM NOON 000NOON PM 204 0 213 PM 1.5 0 1.5 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 1247 0 1866 998 0 1974 1225 0 1236 1415 0 968 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 896417 0 479 382 0 South Leg 31022472 0 East Leg North Leg 314 2413 1322 0 South Leg East Leg 940 00 3140 West Leg 0 West Leg 2942 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 382 0 479 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 119 0 6:00 PM 119 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-007 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h SR-57 NB Ramps and Katella Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 968 119 0 314 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 1247 0 1866 SR - 5 7 N B R a m p s AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1415 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Katella Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:030230000101 7:00 AM 020213173060000101 540 02007:15 AM 024313264050000003 690 02007:30 AM 022928403670000002 666 01007:45 AM 0254 43 78 494 0000504 878 02008:00 AM 0 218 14 29 394 0000303 661 02008:15 AM 021220443170000003 596 08008:30 AM 016631263380000302 566 01008:45 AM 014614342530000104 452 0600 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 1670 176 294 2874 0000130225049 0 24 0 0APPROACH %'s:0.00% 90.47% 9.53% 9.28% 90.72% 0.00% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 37.14% 0.00% 62.86%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :094498 173 1660 000080122895 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.824 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.801 0.0000.877 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-008 Anaheim EASTBOUND State College Blvd State College Blvd AM Gateway Signalized UTURNS Gateway 0.556 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:030230000101 4:00 PM 028798255000028018 605 03004:15 PM 0291311270000011016 602 04004:30 PM 0276515309000018018 641 06004:45 PM 0 319 2 8 304 000021024 678 02005:00 PM 0316104408000038076 852 03005:15 PM 037699379000027027 827 02005:30 PM 031659312000028029 699 04005:45 PM 0302913289000030024 667 0700 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 2483 52 77 2526 000020102325571 0 31 0 0APPROACH %'s :0.00% 97.95% 2.05% 2.96% 97.04% 0.00% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 46.42% 0.00% 53.58%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 1327 26 30 1403 00001140 156 3056 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.897 CONTROL: 0.592 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.870 Signalized GatewayNS/EW Streets:Gateway PM State College Blvd State College Blvd 0.0000.879 Project ID:15-1223-008 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 032 City: AM 0 1660 173 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 0 1403 30 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 12 0 156 1 0000 0 000 8 0 114 1 0 000 0 000 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 0 944 98 AM NOON 000NOON PM 0 1327 26 PM 030Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 0 0 0 20 0 270 0 0 0 271 0 56 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 28701353 1833 1517 1668 0 South Leg 000 East Leg North Leg 2916 291 2710 0 South Leg East Leg 1042 00 14831433 West Leg 0 West Leg 326 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1668 0 1517 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 2789 0 6:00 PM 956 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-008 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h State College Blvd and Gateway , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 56 956 0 1483 Signalized CONTROL 445 PM 000 St a t e C o l l e g e B l v d AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 271 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Gateway Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:230230120010 7:00 AM 5194 1 1 289 20 25 0 20 0 0 0 555 00007:15 AM 5 215 0 0 363 29 37 0 24 0 0 2 675 00007:30 AM 6 201 0 0 348 29 62 0 33 0 0 0 679 00007:45 AM 9234 0 1 448 50 56 0 35 0 0 0 833 01008:00 AM 10 201 0 0 339 45 35 0 12 0 1 0 643 10008:15 AM 4 189 0 0 296 29 36 1 15 0 0 0 570 00008:30 AM 7 170 0 0 312 26 27 0 10 0 0 0 552 00008:45 AM 215100229281819000 438 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:48 1555 1 2 2624 256 296 2 158 0 1 2 4945 1100APPROACH %'s:2.99% 96.95% 0.06% 0.07% 91.05% 8.88% 64.91% 0.44% 34.65% 0.00% 33.33% 66.67%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :30 851 0 1 1498 153 190 0 104 0 1 2 2830 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.849 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.828 0.7740.906 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-009 Anaheim EASTBOUND State College Blvd State College Blvd AM Gene Autry Way Signalized UTURNS Gene Autry Way 0.375 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:230230120010 4:00 PM 9 260 0 1 254 313203303 596 00004:15 PM 1227111253212918001 598 00004:30 PM 1623130299314103201 627 00004:45 PM 1229154283363108203 675 10005:00 PM 1727703386553925216 793 00005:15 PM 1835902347492608312 815 00005:30 PM 8 302 1 1 312 34 21 0 14 2 0 0 695 00005:45 PM 1227220287293909102 653 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:104 2263 12 12 2421 286 258 3 58 15 2 18 5452 1000APPROACH %'s :4.37% 95.12% 0.50% 0.44% 89.04% 10.52% 80.88% 0.94% 18.18% 42.86% 5.71% 51.43%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :55 1229 6 10 1328 174 117 2 35 9 2 11 2978 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.913 CONTROL: 0.611 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.851 Signalized Gene Autry WayNS/EW Streets:Gene Autry Way PM State College Blvd State College Blvd 0.8370.855 Project ID:15-1223-009 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 032 City: AM 153 1498 1 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 174 1328 10 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 20110 1021 1 190 0 117 0090 2 002 0 104 0 35 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 30 851 0 AM NOON 000NOON PM 55 1229 6 PM 230Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 184 0 231 3 0 22 294 0 154 1 0 18 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 26621290 1652 1372 1602 0 South Leg 385478 0 East Leg North Leg 2869 4 2483 0 South Leg East Leg 881 00 13571512 West Leg 0 West Leg 40 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1602 0 1372 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 2695 0 6:00 PM 1043 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-009 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h State College Blvd and Gene Autry Way , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 18 1043 0 1357 Signalized CONTROL 445 PM 184 0 231 St a t e C o l l e g e B l v d AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 10 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Gene Autry Way Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:24023.50.5230230 7:00 AM 20 143 51 47 247 38 49 235 7 18 90 7 952 00007:15 AM 22 143 63 48 276 41 69 281 19 32 88 14 1096 01017:30 AM 25 130 49 57 298 47 57 360 23 37 98 13 1194 10007:45 AM 28 169 67 63 300 69 59 392 18 44 123 15 1347 10118:00 AM 30 145 61 48 264 68 52 289 11 42 143 14 1167 11028:15 AM 40 132 50 30 257 41 57 219 16 48 103 12 1005 11038:30 AM 16 137 47 58 241 43 33 241 7 45 110 13 991 00258:45 AM 37 107 40 15 182 35 39 184 11 47 99 13 809 0010 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:218 1106 428 366 2065 382 415 2201 112 313 854 101 8561 4 3 4 12APPROACH %'s:12.44% 63.13% 24.43% 13.01% 73.41% 13.58% 15.21% 80.68% 4.11% 24.68% 67.35% 7.97%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :105 587 240 216 1138 225 237 1322 71 155 452 56 4804 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.892 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.914 0.8690.883 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-010 Anaheim EASTBOUND State College Blvd State College Blvd AM Orangewood Ave Signalized UTURNS Orangewood Ave 0.833 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:24023.50.5230230 4:00 PM 20 174 27 38 200 28 42 126 11 51 233 53 1003 01054:15 PM 12 224 36 31 197 48 48 120 13 57 210 29 1025 00124:30 PM 22 180 22 38 220 41 52 158 9 60 311 27 1140 04014:45 PM 22 238 33 30 256 38 47 98 9 63 212 29 1075 02015:00 PM 24 211 40 46 263 59 52 181 10 77 330 43 1336 03025:15 PM 21 270 46 33 293 59 50 156 8 75 295 29 1335 10035:30 PM 21 219 31 34 201 57 43 135 12 74 317 33 1177 02015:45 PM 22 227 17 27 236 47 45 113 3 60 194 20 1011 0100 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:164 1743 252 277 1866 377 379 1087 75 517 2102 263 9102 1 13 1 15APPROACH %'s :7.60% 80.73% 11.67% 10.99% 74.05% 14.96% 24.59% 70.54% 4.87% 17.94% 72.94% 9.13%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :88 938 150 143 1013 213 192 570 39 289 1154 134 4923 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.921 CONTROL: 0.876 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.889 Signalized Orangewood AveNS/EW Streets:Orangewood Ave PM State College Blvd State College Blvd 0.8240.872 Project ID:15-1223-010 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 0.5 3.5 2 City: AM 225 1138 216 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 213 1013 143 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 56 0 134 0 452 0 1154 3 2 237 0 192 155 0 289 2 3 1322 0 570 0 71 0 39 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 105 587 240 AM NOON 000NOON PM 88 938 150 PM 240Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 782 0 1455 663 0 1577 1630 0 801 1778 0 863 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 25171176 1579 1341 1364 0 South Leg 22562412 0 East Leg North Leg 2633 2441 2296 0 South Leg East Leg 932 00 12641369 West Leg 0 West Leg 2440 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1364 0 1341 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 2459 0 6:00 PM 880 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-010 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h State College Blvd and Orangewood Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 863 880 0 1264 Signalized CONTROL 445 PM 782 0 1455 St a t e C o l l e g e B l v d AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1778 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Orangewood Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 1.5 1.5 1 2 0 7:00 AM 0 0 0 57 1 69 0 275 21 44 79 0 546 00007:15 AM 0 0 0 48 2 70 0 308 50 63 81 0 622 00007:30 AM 0 0 0 47 7 74 0 369 86 49 115 0 747 00017:45 AM 0006981140 377 64 59 111 0 802 00018:00 AM 0 0 0 76 8 91 0 325 40 46 114 0 700 00008:15 AM 0 0 0 67 5 85 0 254 25 46 112 0 594 00008:30 AM 0 0 0 54 3 87 0 239 51 59 93 0 586 00008:45 AM 0 0 0 73 1 93 0 202 23 54 106 0 552 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 0 0 491 35 683 0 2349 360 420 811 0 5149 0002APPROACH %'s:#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 40.61% 2.89% 56.49% 0.00% 86.71% 13.29% 34.12% 65.88% 0.00%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 0 0 240 25 349 0 1379 240 217 421 0 2871 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.895 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.804 0.8900.000 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-011 Anaheim EASTBOUND SR-57 SB Ramps SR-57 SB Ramps AM Orangewood Ave Signalized UTURNS Orangewood Ave 0.938 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:0 0 0 1.5 0 1.5 0 1.5 1.5 1 2 0 4:00 PM 0 0 0 46 2 81 0 195 30 119 213 0 686 00004:15 PM 0 0 0 46 4 105 0 182 21 112 206 0 676 00004:30 PM 0 0 0 55 4 112 0 211 30 109 220 0 741 00004:45 PM 0 0 0 53 4 133 0 187 25 80 171 0 653 00005:00 PM 0004261340234 38 125 283 0 862 00005:15 PM 0 0 0 54 6 152 0 236 26 89 225 0 788 00005:30 PM 0 0 0 51 2 140 0 205 22 69 220 0 709 00015:45 PM 0005061340 173 14 58 148 0 583 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 0 0 397 34 991 0 1623 206 761 1686 0 5698 0001APPROACH %'s :#DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 27.92% 2.39% 69.69% 0.00% 88.74% 11.26% 31.10% 68.90% 0.00%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :00020420 531 0 868 119 403 899 0 3044 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.883 CONTROL: 0.798 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.890 Signalized Orangewood AveNS/EW Streets:Orangewood Ave PM SR-57 SB Ramps SR-57 SB Ramps 0.9070.000 Project ID:15-1223-011 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 1.5 0 1.5 City: AM 349 25 240 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 531 20 204 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 0000 421 0 899 2 0 000 217 0 403 1 1.5 1379 0 868 1.5 240 0 119 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 000AM NOON 000NOON PM 000PM 000Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 770 0 1430 638 0 1302 1619 0 987 1619 0 1072 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 5420 614 542 482 0 South Leg 24172389 0 East Leg North Leg 755 2257 482 0 South Leg East Leg 0 00 0755 West Leg 0 West Leg 2374 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 482 0 542 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 614 0 6:00 PM 0 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-011 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h SR-57 SB Ramps and Orangewood Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 1072 0 0 0 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 770 0 1430 SR - 5 7 S B R a m p s AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1619 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Orangewood Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.501.5000022021 7:00 AM 18090000024192010330 5747:15 AM 90870000253100013740 6267:30 AM 130970000278143015048 7297:45 AM 2101380000322121015036 7888:00 AM 2401320000303102013442 7378:15 AM 200117000023683013841 6358:30 AM 23083000022075013131 5638:45 AM 25086000020960013031 541 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:153083000002062 776 0 1073 299 5193 0000APPROACH %'s:15.56% 0.00% 84.44% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00% 72.66% 27.34% 0.00% 78.21% 21.79%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :730 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :78 0 484 00001139 449 0 572 167 2889 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.917 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.000 0.8960.884 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-012 Anaheim EASTBOUND SR-57 NB Ramps SR-57 NB Ramps AM Orangewood Ave Signalized UTURNS Orangewood Ave 0.933 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:1.501.5000022021 4:00 PM 17064000015876031185 7114:15 PM 23049000015279030345 6514:30 PM 13044000017391030974 7044:45 PM 7035000015289024969 6015:00 PM 10045000017894039596 8185:15 PM 110310000187111030872 7205:30 PM 23024000017580025864 6245:45 PM 10040000015572020444 525 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:114 033200001330 692 0 2337 549 5354 0000APPROACH %'s :25.56% 0.00% 74.44% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 0.00% 65.78% 34.22% 0.00% 80.98% 19.02%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :410155000069038501261 311 2843 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.869 CONTROL: 0.800 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.000 Signalized Orangewood AveNS/EW Streets:Orangewood Ave PM SR-57 NB Ramps SR-57 NB Ramps 0.9020.860 Project ID:15-1223-012 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 000 City: AM 000 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 000 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 167 0 311 1 572 0 1261 2 0 000 0000 2 1139 0 690 2 449 0 385 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 78 0 484 AM NOON 000NOON PM 41 0 155 PM 1.5 0 1.5 Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 650 0 1302 739 0 1572 1588 0 1075 1623 0 845 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 581196 0 385 449 0 South Leg 23772238 0 East Leg North Leg 311 2362 1011 0 South Leg East Leg 562 00 3110 West Leg 0 West Leg 2417 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 449 0 385 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 167 0 6:00 PM 167 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-012 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h SR-57 NB Ramps and Orangewood Ave , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 845 167 0 311 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 650 0 1302 SR - 5 7 N B R a m p s AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 1623 0 730 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Orangewood Ave Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:2411410001.51.52 7:00 AM 111623062927000142451 597 40007:15 AM 816135113714000161554 675 30007:30 AM 1313251103688000233364 702 50007:45 AM 1417737144006000234283 796 60008:00 AM 11 154 3363265000233591 684 30008:15 AM 91432793256000252795 666 10008:30 AM 101553393115000252768 643 51008:45 AM 141113472515000213667 546 9100 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:90 1195 280 72 2644 46 0 0 0 170 239 573 5309 36 2 0 0APPROACH %'s:5.75% 76.36% 17.89% 2.61% 95.73% 1.67% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 17.31% 24.34% 58.35%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :46 624 156 41 1465 23 0 0 0 85 125 292 2857 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.897 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.910 0.0000.906 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-013 Anaheim EASTBOUND The City Dr-State College Blvd The City Dr-State College Blvd AM I-5 NB Ramps Signalized UTURNS I-5 NB Ramps 0.842 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:2411410001.51.52 4:00 PM 2719310042674000116748 721 60004:15 PM 31 198 104 327270001912255 811 130004:30 PM 39198122531740001217061 928 150004:45 PM 58228113530920001221255 994 161005:00 PM 552661182416600015247501175 120005:15 PM 702851133362300017252791184 170005:30 PM 58245924335500012252721075 140005:45 PM 6124089328260001222167 981 17000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:399 1853 851 29 2560 37 0 0 0 110 1543 487 7869 110 1 0 0APPROACH %'s :12.86% 59.72% 27.43% 1.10% 97.49% 1.41% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0! 5.14% 72.10% 22.76%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :241 1024 436 14 1422 16 0 0 0 56 963 256 4428 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.935 CONTROL: 0.916 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.856 Signalized I-5 NB RampsNS/EW Streets:I-5 NB Ramps PM The City Dr-State College Blvd The City Dr-State College Blvd 0.0000.909 Project ID:15-1223-013 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 141 City: AM 23 1465 41 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 16 1422 14 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 292 0 256 2 125 0 963 1.5 0 000 85 0 56 1.5 0 000 0 000 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 46 624 156 AM NOON 000NOON PM 241 1024 436 PM 241Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 194 0 1220 502 0 1275 0 0 0 197 0 450 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 31791701 1529 1478 1550 0 South Leg 1220194 0 East Leg North Leg 2732 699 2376 0 South Leg East Leg 826 00 12801452 West Leg 0 West Leg 1725 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1550 0 1478 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 2445 0 6:00 PM 916 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-013 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h The City Dr-State College Blvd and I-5 NB Ramps , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 450 916 0 1280 Signalized CONTROL 445 PM 194 0 1220 Th e C i t y D r - S t a t e Co l l e g e B l v d AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 197 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 I-5 NB Ramps Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:04.50.50411.50.52000 7:00 AM 0194 0 0 240 64 10 45 82 0 0 0 6357:15 AM 0 199 2 0 349 55 5 31 111 0 0 0 7527:30 AM 0 188 2 0 320 54 8 58 113 0 0 0 7437:45 AM 0 227 4 0 381 70 7 74 141 0 0 0 9048:00 AM 0 190 2 0 284 51 3 58 160 0 0 0 7488:15 AM 0 172 1 0 313 55 9 51 130 0 0 0 7318:30 AM 0 189 2 0 262 65 8 33 154 000 7138:45 AM 0 148 1 0 234 62 13 39 118 0 0 0 615 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 1507 14 0 2383 476 63 389 1009 0 0 0 5841 0000APPROACH %'s:0.00% 99.08% 0.92% 0.00% 83.35% 16.65% 4.31% 26.63% 69.06% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :080410 0 1334 230 23 221 525 0 0 0 3147 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.870 CONTROL: The City Dr-State College Blvd The City Dr-State College Blvd AM I-5 SB Ramps Signalized UTURNS I-5 SB Ramps 0.000 WESTBOUND 0.867 0.8660.881 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-014 Anaheim EASTBOUND NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:04.50.50411.50.52000 4:00 PM 0 312 2 0 209 83 11 31 77 0 0 0 7254:15 PM 0 325 1 0 228 66 17 36 57 0 0 0 7304:30 PM 0 357 4 0 264 89 10 32 75 0 0 0 8314:45 PM 0 375 3 0 251 82 14 38 82 0 0 0 8455:00 PM 0 417 2 0 324 126 23 37 84 0 0 0 10135:15 PM 0 425 4 0 294 95 16 45 90 0 0 0 9695:30 PM 0 380 4 0 276 91 21 50 72 0 0 0 8945:45 PM 0 359 0 0 255 53 24 48 103 0 0 0 842 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:0 2950 20 0 2101 685 136 317 640 0 0 0 6849 0000APPROACH %'s :0.00% 99.33% 0.67% 0.00% 75.41% 24.59% 12.44% 29.00% 58.55% #DIV/0! #DIV/0! #DIV/0!nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :445 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :0 1597 13 0 1145 394 74 170 328 0 0 0 3721 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.918 CONTROL: Project ID:15-1223-014 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday Signalized I-5 SB RampsNS/EW Streets:I-5 SB Ramps PM The City Dr-State College Blvd The City Dr-State College Blvd 0.9470.938 0.000 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.855 ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 140 City: AM 230 1334 0 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 394 1145 0 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 0000 0000 1.5 23 0 74 0000 0.5 221 0 170 2 525 0 328 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 0 804 10 AM NOON 000NOON PM 0 1597 13 PM 04.50.5Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 230 0 394 0 0 0 769 0 572 231 0 183 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM Date: 231 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 I-5 SB Ramps 445 PM 230 0 394 Th e C i t y D r - S t a t e Co l l e g e B l v d AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h AnaheimDay: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h The City Dr-State College Blvd and I-5 SB Ramps , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 183 827 0 1671 Signalized CONTROL Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-014 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM 9:00 AM 2391 0 6:00 PM 827 0 Total Volume Per Leg 0 West Leg 183 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 1859 0 1473 Northbound Approach South Leg East Leg 814 00 16711539 West Leg South Leg 966999 0 East Leg North Leg 3210 231 2673 0 30831610 1564 1473 1859 0 Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:10220112.50.522.50.5 7:00 AM 802140132714110 71 00007:15 AM 70521004437386 104 00007:30 AM 001270555643152 118 00007:45 AM 207230045284252 127 00008:00 AM 50060232555204 75 00008:15 AM 605160112864122 81 00008:30 AM 404110431332121 57 00008:45 AM 506100471252115 67 0000 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:37 0 30 128 0 17 30 256 39 27 114 22700 0000APPROACH %'s:55.22% 0.00% 44.78% 88.28% 0.00% 11.72% 9.23% 78.77% 12.00% 16.56% 69.94% 13.50%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :715 AM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :14 0 13 77 0 7 16 176 24 15 68 14 424 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.835 CONTROL: NORTHBOUND 9/23/2015 SOUTHBOUND 0.656 0.8310.563 NS/EW Streets: WednesdayProject ID: City: 15-1223-015 Anaheim EASTBOUND I-5 High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV) Ramps I-5 High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV) Ramps AM Gene Autry Way Signalized UTURNS Gene Autry Way 0.782 WESTBOUND Intersection Turning Movement Prepared by:National Data & Surveying Services Day: Date: NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WB LANES:10220112.50.522.50.5 4:00 PM 1905702218732417 104 00004:15 PM 1201702116022311 75 00004:30 PM 21 0 3 10 0 4 3 14 0 6 36 9 106 00004:45 PM 1503601618632919 106 00005:00 PM 1004500415293822 109 00005:15 PM 1403405418334418 116 00005:30 PM 130140581413298 86 00005:45 PM 1602705722412814 106 0010 NL NT NR SL ST SR EL ET ER WL WT WR TOTAL NB SB EB WBTOTAL VOLUMES:12002250024351352330251118808 0010APPROACH %'s :84.51% 0.00% 15.49% 67.57% 0.00% 32.43% 18.13% 69.95% 11.92% 7.52% 62.91% 29.57%nb a nb d sb a sb d eb a eb d wb a nb d PEAK HR START TIME :430 PM TOTAL PEAK HR VOL :60 0 13 25 0 10 17 65 11 21 147 68 437 PEAK HR FACTOR :0.942 CONTROL: 0.855 WESTBOUND NORTHBOUND SOUTHBOUND EASTBOUND 0.625 Signalized Gene Autry WayNS/EW Streets:Gene Autry Way PMI-5 High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV) Ramps I-5 High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV) Ramps 0.7750.760 Project ID:15-1223-015 City:Anaheim UTURNS 9/23/2015 Wednesday ITM Peak Hour Summary Prepared by: National Data & Surveying Services Lanes 102 City: AM 7077 AM NOON 000 NOON PM 10025 PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM Lanes 14 0 68 0.5 68 0 147 2.5 1 16 0 17 15 0 21 2 2.5 176 0 65 0.5 24 0 11 Lanes AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM 14 0 13 AM NOON 000NOON PM 60 0 13 PM 102Lanes AM AM NOON NOON PM PM AM NOON PM AM NOON PM 89 0 217 97 0 236 216 0 93 266 0 103 AM NOON PM AM NOON PM AM AM NOON NOON PM PM 10573 84 32 39 0 South Leg 310305 0 East Leg North Leg 120 363 66 0 South Leg East Leg 27 00 8535 West Leg 0 West Leg 339 End Total Ins & Outs North Leg 39 0 32 Northbound Approach 9:00 AM 114 0 6:00 PM 30 0 Total Volume Per Leg Count Periods AM Start 4:00 PM 15-1223-015 NOON Peak Hour NOON PM 7:00 AM Day: E a s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h I-5 High Occupancy Vehicle(HOV) Ramps and Gene Autry Way , Anaheim PM Peak Hour 103 30 0 85 Signalized CONTROL 430 PM 89 0 217 I- 5 H i g h O c c u p a n c y Ve h i c l e ( H O V ) R a m p s AM Peak Hour Wednesday We s t b o u n d A p p r o a c h Anaheim Date: 266 0 715 AM Peak Hour Summary Southbound Approach Project #:9/23/2015 Gene Autry Way Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -61- Appendix C – Existing (2015) & Existing + Project (2015) Level of Service Worksheets KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps/Manchester Avenue Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.010 0.010 Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.179 * 0.187 * 1 1700 0.026 0.026 Southbound 2 3400 0.043 * 0.043 * 1 1700 0.006 0.006 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.156 0.158 1 1700 0.252 * 0.252 * 2 3400 0.045 * 0.045 * Westbound 4 6800 0.128 0.132 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.569 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.577 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Turn/Through Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Lane Right Turn Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn Movement Left Turn Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Through (2015) G. Samia Existing +ProjectExisting (2015) Weds. September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing 25 00 456 25 10 45 10 45 146 154154 868 0 796 476 0 146 StudyIntersectionNo. 1 428 0 896 0 806 428 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps/Manchester Avenue Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.016 0.016 Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.093 * 0.109 * 1 1700 0.021 0.021 Southbound 2 3400 0.021 * 0.021 * 1 1700 0.008 0.008 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.142 0.149 1 1700 0.289 * 0.289 * 2 3400 0.098 * 0.098 * Westbound 4 6800 0.248 0.251 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.551 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.567 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Left Turn/Right Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) IntersectionNo. 1 0 725 491 0 334 Study 1706 14 35 759 491 73 334 1685 0 237 Existing (2015) 14 00 42 0 Weds. September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn 277 35 73 G. Samia 4:45 - 5:45 PM Existing (2015) 42 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps/Anaheim Way Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.148 * 0.148 * Northbound 3.5 5950 0.117 0.117 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.023 0.023 Eastbound 4 6800 0.173 * 0.177 * 00 - - 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.129 0.141 1 1700 0.038 0.055 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.371 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.375 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 2 378 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through G. Samia 7:30 - 8:30 AM Existing (2015) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 694 0 Existing (2015) 0 79 79 378 694 0 0 0 1203 0 0 0 0 0 65 1173 0 93 0 960877 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps/Anaheim Way Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.235 * 0.235 * Northbound 3.5 5950 0.237 0.237 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.029 * 0.029 * Eastbound 4 6800 0.134 0.145 00 - - 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.255 * 0.265 * 1 1700 0.118 0.131 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.569 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.578 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1735 201 0 598 0 0 1799 222 984 0 00 99 0 Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing (2015) 99 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn 4:45 - 5:45 PM 598 14111411 G. Samia Existing (2015) Existing +Project (2015) Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 0 0 0 910 0 0 StudyIntersectionNo. 2 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Lewis Street Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.014 * 0.014 * Northbound 1 1700 0.055 0.055 00 - - 1 1700 0.040 0.040 Southbound 1 1700 0.008 0.008 1 1700 0.127 * 0.127 * 1 1700 0.205 * 0.205 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.225 0.230 00 - - 1 1700 0.012 0.012 Westbound 3 5100 0.127 * 0.149 * 1 1700 0.041 0.041 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.524 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.546 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) IntersectionNo. 3 70 1145 0 70 20 Study 761 216 68 1175 0 13 20 650 93 0 Existing (2015) 216 349 349 24 93 Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn 0 68 13 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing (2015) 24 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn*** Left Turn Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Lewis Street Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.015 0.015 Northbound 1 1700 0.079 * 0.079 * 00 - - 1 1700 0.034 * 0.034 * Southbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.243 0.243 1 1700 0.084 * 0.084 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.169 0.183 00 - - 1 1700 0.020 0.020 Westbound 3 5100 0.290 * 0.306 * 1 1700 0.026 0.026 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.537 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.554 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 3 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn*** Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 0 58 1 861 0 413 134134 G. Samia Existing (2015) Existing +Project (2015)(2015) 143 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn 4:30 - 5:30 PM 26 3434 143 1 Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing 1478 44 0 26 413 58 1563 44 935 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.034 * 0.066 * Northbound 3 5100 0.124 0.129 1 1700 0.131 0.190 2 3400 0.039 0.039 Southbound 3 5100 0.238 * 0.240 * 1 1700 0.069 0.069 2 3400 0.064 0.064 Eastbound 3.5 5950 0.142 * 0.142 * 1.5 2550 0.060 0.071 2 3400 0.123 * 0.132 * Westbound 3 5100 0.104 0.104 1 1700 0.021 0.021 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.587 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.630 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through 323 133 1225 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing (2015) 114 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 529 633 223 Existing (2015) 117 216 216 225 658 117 133 846 182 1213 419 IntersectionNo. 4 35 846 152 35 448 Study 529 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.068 * 0.093 * Northbound 3 5100 0.174 0.177 1 1700 0.180 0.213 2 3400 0.029 0.029 Southbound 3 5100 0.183 * 0.187 * 1 1700 0.099 0.099 2 3400 0.049 * 0.049 * Eastbound 3.5 5950 0.113 0.113 1.5 2550 0.049 0.078 2 3400 0.107 0.122 Westbound 3 5100 0.237 * 0.237 * 1 1700 0.043 0.043 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.587 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.617 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1211 73 306 232 169 97 1211 73 674 198 415365 167 931 Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing (2015) 167 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn 4:30 - 5:30 PM 317 903887 G. Samia Existing (2015) Existing +Project (2015) Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 362 97 956 674 124 169 StudyIntersectionNo. 4 Right Turn Right Turn** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Stadium Crossing Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.004 0.004 Northbound 0.5 850 - - 1.5 2550 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.029 * 0.029 * Southbound 1 1700 0.000 0.000 1 1700 0.042 0.042 1 1700 0.056 0.056 Eastbound 3 5100 0.231 * 0.251 * 1 1700 0.014 0.014 1 1700 0.005 * 0.005 * Westbound 3 5100 0.169 0.174 1 1700 0.081 0.081 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.316 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.336 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement ** Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Right Turn Lane 860 138 3 6 71 50 889 138 1280 23 99 95 0 Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing (2015) 95 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through*** Lane Movement Left Turn 7:15 - 8:15 AM 6 00 G. Samia Existing (2015) Existing +Project (2015) Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 3 50 0 1180 23 71 StudyIntersectionNo. 5 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Stadium Crossing Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.016 0.016 Northbound 0.5 850 0.002 * 0.002 * 1.5 2550 0.003 0.003 1 1700 0.070 * 0.070 * Southbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.066 0.066 1 1700 0.030 * 0.030 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.205 0.216 1 1700 0.014 0.014 1 1700 0.011 0.011 Westbound 3 5100 0.289 * 0.299 * 1 1700 0.041 0.041 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.442 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.452 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement ** Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Right Turn Lane Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through 7 119 2 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Existing (2015) 27 Through*** Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 1476 2 7 Existing (2015) 112 51 51 27 2 112 119 1102 23 2 19 IntersectionNo. 5 70 1046 23 70 19 Study 1526 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.061 * 0.061 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.156 0.164 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.208 * 0.222 * 1 1700 0.196 0.211 00 - - Westbound 3 5100 0.195 0.197 1 1700 0.152 0.152 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.319 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.334 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) IntersectionNo. 6 258 1059 334 258 0 Study 1004 419 156 1134 359 0 0 995 0 0 Existing (2015) 399 00 0 0 Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn 0 156 0 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing (2015) 0 Right Turn** Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Left Turn Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.067 * 0.067 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.199 0.213 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.209 0.217 1 1700 0.242 0.251 00 - - Westbound 3 5100 0.220 * 0.223 * 1 1700 0.445 0.445 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.337 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.340 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn** Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn Existing +Project (2015) Existing (2015) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) 1067 0 0 0 4:30 - 5:30 PM 411 508 170 0 543 170 0 0 Existing (2015) 756 0 0 0 1124 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 0 G. Samia No. 6 1139 756 1107 427 0 StudyIntersection KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.143 * 0.145 * Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.225 0.225 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.001 0.001 Eastbound 3 5100 0.165 * 0.170 * 1 1700 0.225 0.254 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.147 0.147 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.358 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.365 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 0 840 382 0 0 1002998 0 865 432 0 0 0 0 575 Existing (2015) 0 33 369 1 575 0 Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 1 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Right Turn Left Turn Through G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing (2015) Through StudyIntersectionNo. 7 364 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.080 * 0.083 * Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.084 0.084 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.001 0.001 Eastbound 3 5100 0.148 0.150 1 1700 0.282 0.299 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.290 * 0.291 * 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.420 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.424 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn Existing +Project (2015) Existing (2015) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) 755 212 0 213 4:30 - 5:30 PM 479 0 0 0 0 0 2 204 Existing (2015) 0 2 0 0 1974 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 213 G. Samia No. 7 1981 0 765 509 0 StudyIntersection KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:7:15 - 8:15 AM East-West Street:Gateway Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 3 5100 0.204 0.251 00 - - 2 3400 0.051 0.051 Southbound 3 5100 0.325 * 0.339 * 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.005 * 0.005 * Westbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.007 0.007 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.380 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.394 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1660 0 1278 0 173 0 0 1042 0 8 0 8 Existing (2015) 0 0 173 1731 Existing +Project (2015) 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Existing (2015) StudyIntersection Existing +Project (2015) No. 8 Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Through 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:4:45 - 5:45 PM East-West Street:Gateway Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 3 5100 0.265 0.296 00 - - 2 3400 0.009 0.009 Southbound 3 5100 0.275 * 0.304 * 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.067 * 0.067 * Westbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.092 0.092 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.392 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.421 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Left Turn Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Existing +Project (2015) 0 0 0 0 0 30 1552 114 Existing +Project (2015) 0 0 Existing (2015) 0 156 Existing (2015) 0 1353 0 30 0 0 8 1403 0 1510 StudyIntersectionNo. 114 0 156 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:7:15 - 8:15 AM East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.009 * 0.023 * Northbound 3 5100 0.167 0.167 00 - - 2 3400 0.000 0.000 Southbound 3 5100 0.324 * 0.338 * 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.075 * 0.167 * Eastbound 1.5 2550 0.041 0.103 00 - - 1 1700 0.000 0.000 Westbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.001 0.001 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.457 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.577 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio)No. 9 Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn*** Through Through Right Turn*** Through 262 Existing (2015) StudyIntersection Existing +Project (2015) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Existing +Project (2015) 1 2 104 0 0 190 2 0 0 Existing (2015) 426 0 1 17221651 77 851 0 1 1 30 851 0 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:4:45 - 5:45 PM East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.016 * 0.045 * Northbound 3 5100 0.242 0.242 00 - - 2 3400 0.003 0.003 Southbound 3 5100 0.295 * 0.324 * 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.046 * 0.107 * Eastbound 1.5 2550 0.015 0.055 00 - - 1 1700 0.005 0.005 Westbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.006 0.006 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.407 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.526 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 9 1502 154 1235 StudyIntersectionNo. 9 2 11 11 Existing (2015) 55 1235 0 10 37 0 9 Existing +Project (2015) 2 0 Existing (2015) 274 Existing +Project (2015) 0 117 0 141 0 10 1651 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn*** Through Through Right Turn*** Left Turn Left Turn Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:7:15 - 8:15 AM East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.031 * 0.031 * Northbound 4 6800 0.122 0.125 00 - - 2 3400 0.064 0.075 Southbound 4 6800 0.200 * 0.218 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.070 0.073 Eastbound 3 5100 0.273 * 0.273 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.046 * 0.046 * Westbound 3 5100 0.100 0.102 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.600 Existing 2015 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.617 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1363 105 850 0 216 522 105 827 0 155 0 155 Existing (2015) 247 0 256 1481 Existing +Project (2015) 508 0 1393 0 0 237 0 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Existing (2015) StudyIntersection Existing +Project (2015) No. 10 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Through 1393 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:4:45 - 5:45 PM East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.026 * 0.026 * Northbound 4 6800 0.160 0.167 00 - - 2 3400 0.042 0.051 Southbound 4 6800 0.180 * 0.191 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.056 * 0.062 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.119 0.119 00 - - 2 3400 0.085 0.085 Westbound 3 5100 0.253 * 0.258 * 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.565 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.588 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Left Turn Left Turn Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Existing +Project (2015) 0 192 0 609 0 173 1300 289 Existing +Project (2015) 1318 0 Existing (2015) 211 0 Existing (2015) 88 1088 0 143 609 0 10 1226 88 1138 StudyIntersectionNo. 289 1288 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.094 * 0.094 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.147 0.147 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.406 * 0.410 * 1 1700 0.141 0.156 1 1700 0.128 * 0.128 * Westbound 2 3400 0.124 0.128 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.677 Existing 2015 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.682 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Optional Through/Left/Right Turn Lane (Through Added to Left Turn for V/C Ratio) 0 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) Existing (2015) 0 0 0 217 421 0 1379 240 435 0 1394 265 217 374 00 0 0 0 374 240 0 240 Weds., September 23, 2015 StudyIntersectionNo. 11 Existing (2015) June 1, 2018 NDS KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.080 * 0.080 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.216 0.216 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.255 * 0.258 * 1 1700 0.070 0.082 1 1700 0.237 * 0.237 * Westbound 2 3400 0.264 0.273 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.622 Existing 2015 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.625 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Optional Through/Left/Right Turn Lane (Through Added to Left Turn for V/C Ratio) 551 00 0 0 0 0 204 0 899 0 868 119 June 1, 2018 NDS 929 551 0 (2015) Existing (2015) 0 0 Lane Movement Left Turn Existing +Project (2015) 878 139 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Through Through StudyIntersectionNo. 11 204 0 403403 Weds., September 23, 2015 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Existing +Project (2015) Existing KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour:7:30 - 8:30 AM East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.031 0.033 Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.190 * 0.190 * 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.335 * 0.338 * 1 1700 0.264 0.267 00 - - Westbound 2 3400 0.168 0.170 1 1700 0.098 0.098 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.575 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.578 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) (2015) 0 00 0 85 0 484 0 484 0 572 167 1139 449 579 167 Existing (2015) 78 0 Lane Movement Left Turn Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn StudyIntersectionNo. 12 0 0 1149 454 0 0 Existing +Project (2015) Existing Through Through Existing +Project (2015) KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.016 * 0.022 * Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.061 0.061 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.203 0.204 1 1700 0.226 0.229 00 - - Westbound 2 3400 0.371 * 0.375 * 1 1700 0.183 0.183 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.437 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.447 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 0 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Existing (2015) 41 0 155 0 1261 311 690 385 1276 311 695 390 0 0 00 0 56 0 0 0 155 0 StudyIntersectionNo. 12 Existing (2015) KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.014 * 0.014 * Northbound 4 6800 0.092 0.093 1 1700 0.092 0.092 1 1700 0.024 0.024 Southbound 4 6800 0.215 * 0.227 * 1 1700 0.014 0.014 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.050 0.050 Westbound 2 3400 0.037 * 0.037 * 2 3400 0.086 0.091 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.316 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.327 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 13 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing (2015) Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 125 292 0 0 23 0 309 0 0 85 Existing (2015) 0 156 41 15441465 46 630 23 41 125 46 624 156 85 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.071 * 0.071 * Northbound 4 6800 0.151 0.153 1 1700 0.256 0.256 1 1700 0.008 0.008 Southbound 4 6800 0.209 * 0.217 * 1 1700 0.009 0.009 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.033 0.033 Westbound 2 3400 0.283 * 0.283 * 2 3400 0.075 0.086 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.613 Existing 2015 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.621 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 13 1422 241 1037 StudyIntersectionNo. 56 963 256 436 14 0 0 Existing (2015) 16 00 0 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 963 16 293 Existing (2015) 241 1024 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) 56 436 14 1474 G. Samia 4:45 - 5:45 PM Existing +Project (2015) 0 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 5 8500 0.096 0.096 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 4 6800 0.196 * 0.200 * 1 1700 0.135 0.168 1 1700 0.014 0.014 Eastbound 1 1700 0.130 * 0.130 * 2 3400 0.154 0.154 00 - - Westbound 0 0 - - 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.376 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.380 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1334 0 820 285 0 0 0 814 0 0 0 221 525 0 Existing (2015) 23 0 0 1358 0 0 221 525 230 23 Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing (2015) StudyIntersectionNo. 14 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 5 8500 0.189 * 0.191 * 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 4 6800 0.168 0.171 1 1700 0.232 0.253 1 1700 0.044 0.044 Eastbound 1 1700 0.100 * 0.100 * 2 3400 0.096 0.096 00 - - Westbound 0 0 - - 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.339 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.341 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through 0 0 0 1161 G. Samia 4:45 - 5:45 PM Existing +Project (2015) 328 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 430 0 Existing (2015) 0 1610 0 0 170 328 Existing (2015) 394 74 74 170 14 1145 0 1623 StudyIntersectionNo. 0 0 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 HOV Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.008 0.008 Northbound 0 0 - - 2 3400 0.004 * 0.014 * 2 3400 0.023 * 0.033 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.004 0.004 1 1700 0.009 0.009 Eastbound 3 5100 0.039 * 0.049 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.004 * 0.011 * Westbound 3 5100 0.016 0.031 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.120 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.158 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 15 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Existing (2015) Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) Existing +Project (2015) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 82 0 200 0 7 16 0 248 0 39 Existing (2015) 16 49 113 00 14 0 7 77 156 14 0 13 15 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Existing; Existing Plus Project Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 HOV Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.035 0.035 Northbound 0 0 - - 2 3400 0.004 * 0.026 * 2 3400 0.007 * 0.032 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.006 0.006 1 1700 0.010 0.010 Eastbound 3 5100 0.015 * 0.035 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.006 0.011 Westbound 3 5100 0.042 * 0.052 * 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.118 Existing 2015 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.194 Horizon 2018 Plus Ambient Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 15 0 60 0 StudyIntersectionNo. 21 215 0 13 25 76 0 Existing (2015) 10 17 17 176 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 264 10 0 Existing (2015) 60 0 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Existing +Project (2015) 37 87 109 0 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Existing +Project (2015) 0 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through Jefferson Stadium Park Traffic Impact Study Anaheim, California by KHR Associates -62- Appendix D – Existing + Ambient + Cumulative (2018) & Existing + Ambient + Cumulative + Project (2018) Level of Service Worksheets KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps/Manchester Avenue Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.010 0.010 Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.199 * 0.207 * 1 1700 0.027 0.027 Southbound 2 3400 0.044 * 0.044 * 1 1700 0.006 0.006 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.182 0.184 1 1700 0.259 * 0.259 * 2 3400 0.067 * 0.067 * Westbound 4 6800 0.167 0.171 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.619 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.627 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Turn/Through Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Lane Right Turn Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn Movement Left Turn Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Through (2018) G. Samia Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project+Cumulative (2018) Weds. September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 7:15 - 8:15 AM +Cumulative 26 00 508 26 10 46 10 46 150 227227 1133 0 929 528 0 150 StudyIntersectionNo. 1 441 0 1161 0 939 441 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps/Manchester Avenue Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.017 0.017 Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.162 * 0.178 * 1 1700 0.021 0.021 Southbound 2 3400 0.022 * 0.022 * 1 1700 0.008 0.008 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.166 * 0.173 * 1 1700 0.298 0.298 2 3400 0.109 0.109 Westbound 4 6800 0.262 * 0.265 * 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.642 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.657 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Left Turn/Right Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) IntersectionNo. 1 0 846 506 0 372 Study 1805 14 36 880 506 75 372 1784 0 414 +Cumulative (2018) 14 00 43 0 Weds. September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn 454 36 75 G. Samia 4:45 - 5:45 PM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 43 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps/Anaheim Way Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.153 * 0.153 * Northbound 3.5 5950 0.128 0.128 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.024 * 0.024 * Eastbound 4 6800 0.199 0.204 00 - - 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.211 * 0.223 * 1 1700 0.055 0.072 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.438 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.450 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 2 389 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through G. Samia 7:30 - 8:30 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 763 0 +Cumulative (2018) 0 81 81 389 763 0 0 0 1386 0 0 0 0 0 94 1356 0 122 0 15191436 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps/Anaheim Way Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.242 0.242 Northbound 3.5 5950 0.292 * 0.292 * 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.030 * 0.030 * Eastbound 4 6800 0.177 0.188 00 - - 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.313 * 0.322 * 1 1700 0.132 0.145 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.685 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.694 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 2128 225 0 616 0 0 2192 246 1281 0 00 102 0 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 102 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn 4:45 - 5:45 PM 616 17361736 G. Samia Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 0 0 0 1207 0 0 StudyIntersectionNo. 2 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Lewis Street Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.015 * 0.015 * Northbound 1 1700 0.096 0.096 00 - - 1 1700 0.049 0.049 Southbound 1 1700 0.008 0.008 1 1700 0.131 * 0.131 * 1 1700 0.212 * 0.212 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.270 0.275 00 - - 1 1700 0.012 0.012 Westbound 3 5100 0.241 * 0.263 * 1 1700 0.060 0.060 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.648 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.670 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through 0 83 13 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 25 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 1229 163 0 +Cumulative (2018) 223 360 360 25 163 223 83 1405 0 13 21 IntersectionNo. 3 102 1375 0 102 21 Study 1340 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Lewis Street Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.016 0.016 Northbound 1 1700 0.109 * 0.109 * 00 - - 1 1700 0.061 * 0.061 * Southbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.250 0.250 1 1700 0.087 * 0.087 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.282 0.297 00 - - 1 1700 0.040 0.040 Westbound 3 5100 0.369 * 0.385 * 1 1700 0.035 0.035 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.675 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.692 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1881 59 0 27 426 103 1966 59 1513 0 6868 147 1 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 147 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn 4:30 - 5:30 PM 27 185185 G. Samia Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 0 103 1 1439 0 426 StudyIntersectionNo. 3 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.058 * 0.090 * Northbound 3 5100 0.128 0.133 1 1700 0.155 0.213 2 3400 0.040 0.040 Southbound 3 5100 0.245 * 0.247 * 1 1700 0.081 0.081 2 3400 0.075 0.075 Eastbound 3.5 5950 0.224 * 0.224 * 1.5 2550 0.127 0.139 2 3400 0.131 * 0.139 * Westbound 3 5100 0.149 0.149 1 1700 0.021 0.021 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.707 Project 2018 Level of Service C ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.751 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service C * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through 363 137 1262 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 196 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 760 654 263 +Cumulative (2018) 138 256 256 307 679 138 137 1331 354 1250 445 IntersectionNo. 4 36 1331 324 36 474 Study 760 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.132 * 0.157 * Northbound 3 5100 0.181 0.184 1 1700 0.203 0.235 2 3400 0.029 0.029 Southbound 3 5100 0.191 * 0.196 * 1 1700 0.133 0.133 2 3400 0.057 * 0.057 * Eastbound 3.5 5950 0.163 0.163 1.5 2550 0.119 0.148 2 3400 0.123 0.138 Westbound 3 5100 0.324 * 0.324 * 1 1700 0.044 0.044 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.755 Project 2018 Level of Service C ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.785 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service C * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1655 75 344 448 226 100 1655 75 967 377 468418 194 976 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 194 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Lane Movement Left Turn 4:30 - 5:30 PM 533 940924 G. Samia Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 400 100 1001 967 303 226 StudyIntersectionNo. 4 Right Turn Right Turn** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Stadium Crossing Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.004 0.004 Northbound 0.5 850 0.000 0.000 1.5 2550 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.030 * 0.030 * Southbound 1 1700 0.000 0.000 1 1700 0.050 0.050 1 1700 0.071 0.071 Eastbound 3 5100 0.331 * 0.350 * 1 1700 0.014 0.014 1 1700 0.005 * 0.005 * Westbound 3 5100 0.216 0.222 1 1700 0.084 0.084 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.416 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.436 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement ** Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Right Turn Lane 1103 142 3 6 84 52 1132 142 1787 24 99 121 0 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 121 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through*** Lane Movement Left Turn 7:15 - 8:15 AM 6 00 G. Samia Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn 3 52 0 1687 24 84 StudyIntersectionNo. 5 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Stadium Crossing Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.016 0.016 Northbound 0.5 850 0.002 0.002 1.5 2550 0.003 0.003 1 1700 0.072 * 0.072 * Southbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.081 0.081 1 1700 0.040 * 0.040 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.267 0.278 1 1700 0.014 0.014 1 1700 0.012 0.012 Westbound 3 5100 0.382 * 0.392 * 1 1700 0.042 0.042 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.544 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.554 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement ** Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Right Turn Lane Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through 7 123 2 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 28 Through*** Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 1948 2 7 +Cumulative (2018) 137 69 69 28 2 137 123 1420 24 2 20 IntersectionNo. 5 72 1364 24 72 20 Study 1998 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.063 * 0.063 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.211 0.218 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.281 * 0.296 * 1 1700 0.276 0.291 00 - - Westbound 3 5100 0.221 0.223 1 1700 0.156 0.156 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.394 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.409 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn** Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Left Turn Through 0 161 0 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 0 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 1126 0 0 +Cumulative (2018) 537 00 0 0 557 161 1508 494 0 0 IntersectionNo. 6 266 1433 469 266 0 Study 1135 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.069 * 0.069 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.272 0.286 00 - - Eastbound 3 5100 0.249 0.257 1 1700 0.316 0.326 00 - - Westbound 3 5100 0.277 * 0.280 * 1 1700 0.458 0.458 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.396 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.399 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio)No. 6 1429 779 1311 553 0 StudyIntersection 779 0 0 0 1414 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 0 G. Samia 0 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 537 694 175 0 729 175 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. 1271 0 0 0 4:30 - 5:30 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) +Cumulative (2018) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Right Turn** Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.167 * 0.169 * Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.232 0.232 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.001 0.001 Eastbound 3 5100 0.203 * 0.208 * 1 1700 0.333 0.362 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.158 0.159 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.420 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.427 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 7 426 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 592 +Cumulative (2018) 0 33 431 0 592 0 0 1061 616 0 0 0 0 0 1036 566 0 0 10821078 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Katella Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.149 * 0.152 * Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.086 0.086 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 2 3400 0.001 0.001 Eastbound 3 5100 0.164 0.166 1 1700 0.358 0.376 00 - - Westbound 4 6800 0.312 * 0.313 * 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.510 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.515 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio)No. 7 2126 0 845 639 0 StudyIntersection 0 2 0 0 2119 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 219 G. Samia 2 379 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 609 0 0 0 0 0 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. 835 387 0 219 4:30 - 5:30 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) +Cumulative (2018) Through Lane Movement Left Turn Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Left Turn Left Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:7:15 - 8:15 AM East-West Street:Gateway Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 3 5100 0.233 0.279 00 - - 2 3400 0.052 0.052 Southbound 3 5100 0.371 * 0.385 * 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.005 * 0.005 * Westbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.007 0.007 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.425 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.439 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio)No. 8 Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn*** Through 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) StudyIntersection Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 12 0 0 0 0 12 0 8 +Cumulative (2018) 0 0 178 19611890 0 1424 0 178 0 0 1188 0 8 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:4:45 - 5:45 PM East-West Street:Gateway Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 3 5100 0.319 0.350 00 - - 2 3400 0.009 0.009 Southbound 3 5100 0.332 * 0.361 * 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.069 * 0.069 * Westbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.095 0.095 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.451 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.480 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 8 1694 0 1785 StudyIntersectionNo. 117 0 161 161 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 0 1628 0 31 0 0 117 Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 0 +Cumulative (2018) 0 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 0 0 0 0 31 1843 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Left Turn Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:7:15 - 8:15 AM East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.023 * 0.036 * Northbound 3 5100 0.188 0.188 00 - - 2 3400 0.000 0.000 Southbound 3 5100 0.369 * 0.383 * 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.090 * 0.183 * Eastbound 1.5 2550 0.059 0.121 00 - - 1 1700 0.000 0.000 Westbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.001 0.001 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.532 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.652 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio)No. 9 Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn*** Through Through Right Turn*** Through 308 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) StudyIntersection Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 1 2 150 0 0 231 2 0 0 +Cumulative (2018) 467 0 1 19521881 124 960 0 1 1 77 960 0 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:4:45 - 5:45 PM East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.033 * 0.063 * Northbound 3 5100 0.290 0.290 00 - - 2 3400 0.003 0.003 Southbound 3 5100 0.349 * 0.378 * 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.063 * 0.125 * Eastbound 1.5 2550 0.030 0.071 00 - - 1 1700 0.005 0.005 Westbound 1 1700 0.001 0.001 1 1700 0.007 0.007 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.496 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.616 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 9 1781 213 1479 StudyIntersectionNo. 9 2 11 11 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 114 1479 0 10 77 0 9 Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 2 0 +Cumulative (2018) 319 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 162 0 181 0 10 1930 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Right Turn Right Turn*** Right Turn*** Through Through Right Turn*** Left Turn Left Turn Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:7:15 - 8:15 AM East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.040 * 0.040 * Northbound 4 6800 0.150 0.153 00 - - 2 3400 0.080 0.092 Southbound 4 6800 0.234 * 0.251 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.088 0.091 Eastbound 3 5100 0.296 * 0.296 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.087 * 0.087 * Westbound 3 5100 0.127 0.129 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.706 Project 2018 Level of Service C ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.724 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service C * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1590 135 1043 0 274 660 135 1020 0 296 0 296 +Cumulative (2018) 308 0 314 1708 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 646 0 1508 0 0 298 0 Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) StudyIntersection Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. No. 10 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Through 1508 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour:4:45 - 5:45 PM East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.027 * 0.027 * Northbound 4 6800 0.216 0.223 00 - - 2 3400 0.072 0.081 Southbound 4 6800 0.202 * 0.212 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.059 * 0.065 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.127 0.127 00 - - 2 3400 0.124 0.124 Westbound 3 5100 0.285 * 0.291 * 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.623 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.645 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Wide Enough Shoulder for Separate Right Turn ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn** Left Turn Left Turn Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 201 0 646 0 276 1445 422 Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 1485 0 +Cumulative (2018) 220 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 91 1468 0 246 646 0 10 1371 91 1518 StudyIntersectionNo. 422 1455 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.117 * 0.117 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.151 0.151 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.467 * 0.472 * 1 1700 0.215 0.230 1 1700 0.132 * 0.132 * Westbound 2 3400 0.148 0.152 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.765 Project 2018 Level of Service C ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.770 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service C * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Optional Through/Left/Right Turn Lane (Through Added to Left Turn for V/C Ratio) 0 G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through*** Through Right Turn Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 0 0 0 224 503 0 1589 365 517 0 1604 390 224 386 00 0 0 0 386 297 0 297 Weds., September 23, 2015 StudyIntersectionNo. 11 +Cumulative (2018) June 1, 2018 NDS KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Southbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1.5 2550 0.082 * 0.082 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.281 0.281 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.300 * 0.303 * 1 1700 0.126 0.138 1 1700 0.244 * 0.244 * Westbound 2 3400 0.333 0.342 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.677 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.680 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Lane Specific for Turn Before Intersection ***Denotes Optional Through/Left/Right Turn Lane (Through Added to Left Turn for V/C Ratio) 717 00 0 0 0 0 210 0 1133 0 1020 215 June 1, 2018 NDS 1163 717 0 (2018) Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 0 0 Lane Movement Left Turn Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. 1030 235 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through*** Through Right Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Through Through StudyIntersectionNo. 11 210 0 415415 Weds., September 23, 2015 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) +Cumulative KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date:Weds., September 23, 2015 Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date:June 1, 2018 North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour:7:30 - 8:30 AM East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source:NDS Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By:G. Samia Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.051 0.053 Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.196 * 0.196 * 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.360 * 0.363 * 1 1700 0.341 0.344 00 - - Westbound 2 3400 0.179 0.181 1 1700 0.101 0.101 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.605 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.608 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) +Cumulative Through Through Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. StudyIntersectionNo. 12 0 0 1234 585 0 0 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 129 0 Lane Movement Left Turn 0 609 172 1224 580 616 172 (2018) 0 00 0 136 0 499 0 499 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:SR-57 Northbound Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Orangewood Avenue Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1.5 2550 0.073 0.079 Northbound 0 0 - - 1.5 2550 0.063 * 0.063 * 00 - - Southbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 00 - - Eastbound 2 3400 0.221 0.223 1 1700 0.283 0.286 00 - - Westbound 2 3400 0.401 * 0.405 * 1 1700 0.188 0.188 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.514 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.518 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 12 +Cumulative (2018) 0 00 0 200 0 0 0 160 0 0 1363 320 753 481 1378 320 758 486 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 185 0 160 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn 0 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.014 * 0.014 * Northbound 4 6800 0.112 0.113 1 1700 0.095 0.095 1 1700 0.025 0.025 Southbound 4 6800 0.249 * 0.260 * 1 1700 0.072 0.072 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.080 0.080 Westbound 2 3400 0.038 * 0.038 * 2 3400 0.102 0.107 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.351 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.362 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 13 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn** Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 129 347 0 0 122 0 364 0 0 136 +Cumulative (2018) 0 161 42 17711692 47 771 122 42 129 47 765 161 136 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Northbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 2 3400 0.073 * 0.073 * Northbound 4 6800 0.185 0.187 1 1700 0.264 0.264 1 1700 0.008 0.008 Southbound 4 6800 0.235 * 0.243 * 1 1700 0.057 0.057 00 - - Eastbound 0 0 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.034 0.034 Westbound 2 3400 0.292 * 0.292 * 2 3400 0.120 0.131 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.650 Project 2018 Level of Service B ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.657 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service B * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 13 1597 248 1272 StudyIntersectionNo. 58 992 407 449 14 0 0 +Cumulative (2018) 97 00 0 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 992 97 444 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 248 1259 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn** Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. 58 449 14 1649 G. Samia 4:45 - 5:45 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 5 8500 0.105 0.106 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 4 6800 0.219 * 0.222 * 1 1700 0.195 0.227 1 1700 0.052 0.052 Eastbound 1 1700 0.134 * 0.134 * 2 3400 0.159 0.159 00 - - Westbound 0 0 - - 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.403 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.406 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 1488 0 902 386 0 0 0 896 0 0 0 228 541 0 +Cumulative (2018) 88 0 0 1512 0 0 228 541 331 88 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) StudyIntersectionNo. 14 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:I-5 Southbound Ramps Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 00 - - Northbound 5 8500 0.203 * 0.205 * 00 - - 00 - - Southbound 4 6800 0.181 0.183 1 1700 0.286 0.307 1 1700 0.124 0.124 Eastbound 1 1700 0.103 * 0.103 * 2 3400 0.099 0.099 00 - - Westbound 0 0 - - 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.356 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.358 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through 0 0 0 1248 G. Samia 4:45 - 5:45 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 338 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 522 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 0 1727 0 0 175 338 +Cumulative (2018) 486 211 211 175 14 1232 0 1740 StudyIntersectionNo. 0 0 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 HOV Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year * There is No West Leg of Gene Autry Way - This is a T-Intersection Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.008 0.008 Northbound 0 0 - - 2 3400 0.010 0.020 2 3400 0.029 * 0.040 * Southbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.004 0.004 1 1700 0.014 0.014 Eastbound 3 5100 0.044 * 0.054 * 00 - - 2 3400 0.013 * 0.020 * Westbound 3 5100 0.028 0.042 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.137 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.164 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 15 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 141 0 226 0 7 23 0 274 0 69 +Cumulative (2018) 23 68 135 00 14 0 7 99 215 14 0 32 45 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:I-5 HOV Ramps Peak Hour: East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year * There is No West Leg of Gene Autry Way - This is a T-Intersection Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.036 * 0.036 * Northbound 0 0 - - 2 3400 0.014 0.035 2 3400 0.017 0.042 Southbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.006 0.006 1 1700 0.010 * 0.010 * Eastbound 3 5100 0.018 0.038 00 - - 2 3400 0.013 0.018 Westbound 3 5100 0.050 * 0.059 * 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.146 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.156 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 15 0 62 0 StudyIntersectionNo. 45 253 0 46 59 92 0 +Cumulative (2018) 10 18 18 192 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 302 10 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 62 0 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. 61 120 143 0 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:Artisan Court Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.001 * 0.001 * Northbound 3 5100 0.211 0.220 1 1700 0.000 0.000 1 1700 0.000 0.000 Southbound 3 5100 0.363 * 0.394 * 00 - - 1 1700 0.001 * 0.001 * Eastbound 1 1700 0.000 0.000 00 - - 1 1700 0.000 0.000 Westbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.000 0.000 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.414 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.445 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) StudyIntersectionNo. 16 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 +Cumulative (2018) 1 0 0 20111853 1 1123 0 0 0 1 1076 0 0 KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:State College Boulevard Peak Hour: East-West Street:Artisan Court Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.001 * 0.001 * Northbound 3 5100 0.294 0.314 1 1700 0.000 0.000 1 1700 0.000 0.000 Southbound 3 5100 0.318 * 0.338 * 00 - - 1 1700 0.001 * 0.001 * Eastbound 1 1700 0.000 0.000 00 - - 1 1700 0.000 0.000 Westbound 0 0 - - 1 1700 0.000 0.000 ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.369 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.389 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 16 1621 1 1600 StudyIntersectionNo. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 +Cumulative (2018) 0 11 0 June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 0 0 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 1 1501 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. 0 0 0 1725 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Union Street Peak Hour: East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.000 0.058 Northbound 1 1700 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.061 * 0.061 * Southbound 1 1700 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.021 0.021 Eastbound 3 5100 0.057 * 0.080 * 00 - - 1 1700 0.000 * 0.069 * Westbound 3 5100 0.039 0.039 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.167 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.260 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) 69 98 148 0 103 200 0 0 0 0 0 409 0 118 +Cumulative (2018) 36 0 103 69 200 0 289 0 0 36 Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim Through Through Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn G. Samia 7:15 - 8:15 AM Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) StudyIntersectionNo. 17 Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn KHR ASSOCIATES INTERSECTION CAPACITY UTILIZATION ANALYSIS Conditions:Ex.+Amb.+Cum.; Ex.+Amb.+Cum.+Proj.Count Date: Location:City of Anaheim, California Horizon Date: North-South Street:Union Street Peak Hour: East-West Street:Gene Autry Way Data Source: Annual Growth Rate:1.00%Input By: Comments:City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour Per Lane = 1700 City of Anaheim Capacity Volume of Vehicles Per Hour For Dual Left-Turn Lanes = 3400 Ambient Growth Factor per City of Anaheim = 1 % Per Year Peak Hour Volume Volume/Capacity Ratio Direction Number Capacity of of (Veh/Hr) Travel Lanes On Green 1 1700 0.000 0.038 Northbound 1 1700 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.039 * 0.039 * Southbound 1 1700 - - 00 - - 1 1700 0.040 0.040 Eastbound 3 5100 0.024 * 0.072 * 00 - - 1 1700 0.000 * 0.146 * Westbound 3 5100 0.071 0.071 00 - - ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.113 Project 2018 Level of Service A ICU Plus Lost Time Factor of .05 0.307 Cumulative 2018 Level of Service A * Denotes Critical Movement **Denotes Optional Through/Turn Lane ***Denotes Shared Movement With Through Lane (Added to Through for V/C Ratio) Right Turn Right Turn Right Turn Through Through Right Turn Left Turn Through Through 248 0 67 45 G. Samia 4:30 - 5:30 PM Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) 0 Lane Movement Left Turn Left Turn Left Turn Weds, September 23, 2015 Ex.+Amb.+Cum. +Project (2018) Ex.+Amb. June 1, 2018 City of Anaheim 361 0 0 Ex.+Amb. +Cumulative (2018) 0 0 0 67 120 0 +Cumulative (2018) 0 68 68 368 17 45 65 98 StudyIntersectionNo. 0 361 0 APPENDIX J Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire and Domestic Water Service Study Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire & Domestic Water Service AMB Platinum, LLC JPI Jefferson Stadium Park TTM P.M. 2015-174 1969 S. State College Blvd. Anaheim, California 92805 January 11, 2016 Prepared By: ATTESTATION This report has been prepared by, and under the direction of, the undersigned, a duly Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Except as noted, the undersigned attests to the technical information contained herein, and has judged to be acceptable the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data for this report, upon which findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based. ________________________________ ______________________ James H. Kawamura, P.E. Date: January 11, 2016 Registered Civil Engineer No. C30560 Exp. 3/31/16     Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire & Domestic Water Service Phase I AMB Platinum, LLC JPI Jefferson Stadium Park TTM P.M. 2015‐174 1969 S. State College Blvd. Anaheim, California 92805 January 11, 2016 Prepared By:      ATTESTATION This report has been prepared by, and under the direction of, the undersigned, a duly Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Except as noted, the undersigned attests to the technical information contained herein, and has judged to be acceptable the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data for this report, upon which findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based. ________________________________ ______________________ James H. Kawamura, P.E. Date: January 11, 2016 Registered Civil Engineer No. C30560 Exp. 3/31/16       i CONTENTS Attestation Design Criteria Design Assumptions HGL at Fixed Grade Node Calculations Average Water Demand Calculations Hydrants and Flow Test Fire hydrant @ junction J-1, J-6, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IA: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-1, J-6, J-7, J-9, J-11, J-16 & J-17. Fire hydrant @ junction J-1, J-10, fire sprinkler J-7, 17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IB: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-1, J-7, J-9, J-10, J-11, J-16 & J-17. Fire hydrant @ junction J-1, J-12, fire sprinkler J-7,J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IC: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-1, J-7, J-9, J-11, J-12 & J-16, J-17 Fire hydrant @ junction J-1, J-14, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario ID: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-1, J-7, J-9, J-11, J-14, J-16 & J-17. Fire hydrant @ junction J-6, J-10, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IE: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-6, J-7, J-9, J-10, J-11, J-16 & J-17. Fire hydrant @ junction J-6, J-12, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IF: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-6, J-7, J-9, J-11, J-12, J-16 & J-17. ii Fire hydrant @ junction J-6, J-14, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IG: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-6, J-7, J-9, J-11, J-14, J-16 & J-17. Fire hydrant @ junction J-10, J-12, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IH: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-9, J-10, J-11, J-12, J-16 & J-17. Fire hydrant @ junction J-10, J-14, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IJ: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-9, J-10, J-11, J-14, J-16 & J-17 Fire hydrant @ junction J-12, J-14, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IK: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-9, J-11, J-12, J-14, J-16 & J-17 Fire hydrant @ junction J-1, J-18, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IL: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-1, J-7, J-9, J-11, J-16, J-17 & J-18. Fire hydrant @ junction J-6, J-18, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IM: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-6, J-7, J-9, J-11, J-16, J-17 & J-18. Fire hydrant @ junction J-10, J-18, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IN: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-9, J-10, J-11, J-16, J-17 & J-18. Fire hydrant @ junction J-12, J-18, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IO: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-9, J-11, J-12, J-16, J-17 & J-18. Fire hydrant @ junction J-14, J-18, fire sprinkler J-7, J-17 & Domestic Water @ J-9, J-11 & J-16 flowing simultaneously Scenario IP: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,470 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-9, J-11, J-14, J-16, J-17, & J-18. iii Hydraulic Network Software The software used to calculate the hydraulic network for the Project is Bentley WaterCAD V8i (Select 4), a water distribution modeling and management program by Haestad Methods, Solution Center., 27 Siemon Company Drive, Suite 200W Watertown, CT 06795 USA. Design Criteria: Maximum pressure at Nodes = 86.00 psi Static Pressure at State College Blvd. Maximum Pressure at Nodes = 80.00 Residual Pressure at Fire Hydrant Minimum pressure at Fire hydrant = 20 psi Fire flow demand: (2) 2,000 gpm fire hydrant at 20 psi. (Minimum allowable per 50% reduction for sprinkler system per UFC Appendix III for Type V - n hr. construction), Maximum fire area for Building type per Site plan. Sprinkler System Demand: maximum of 300 gpm (per Building Types) Pipeline friction factor (adjusted to include minor pipeline losses): Pipe Material PVC 150 Coefficient Pipe Material DIP 120 Coefficient Domestic Water Demand: Total number of Fixture Units per Building Design Assumptions: Available pressure near site: Southwest corner State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way Flowed FH # 5298 and Residual City FH # 5297 Result of 86.00 Static Pressure, 80.00 psi Residual Pressure Head losses: 4” Water Meter: 9.6 8” Reduced pressure assembly: 12.50 psi Node Elevations: Water lateral connections at 1’ below top of meter. iv Fire hydrant connections at 2.5’ above finished surface. HGL at Fixed Grade Nodes (FGN) Pressure Test: Flow test Hydrant location: Front of the Proposed Project in Gene Autry Way Available Pressure Residual = 80.00 psi at Elevation 149.80’ Date of flow test: September 9, 2015 Available head: I Available head @ pressure 80.00 psi: (Gene Autry Way) Elevation of measured hydrant 149.80 ft. Measure Pressure (psi) x 2.308 80 x 2.308 184.64 ft. Available Hydraulic Grade Line available 334.44 ft. Node R1 Available Hydraulic Grade line 334.44 ft. Elevation Node 150.80 ft. Difference 183.64 ft. Head Losses 12.50 psi = 12.5 x 2.308 -28.85 ft. Equal HGL at Fixed Grade Node 305.59 ft. Node R2 Available Hydraulic Grade line 334.44 ft. Elevation Node 149.60 ft. Difference 184.84 ft. Head Losses 12.50 psi = 12.5 x 2.308 -28.85 ft. Equal HGL at Fixed Grade Node 305.59 ft. Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 & J - 6 , F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 D o m e s t i c J- 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u lt a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 a : 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.043 10.07 3, 5 5 1 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.076 4.40 1, 5 5 1 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.008 4.40 1, 5 5 1 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.128 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.346 14.68 2, 3 0 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.107 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.008 3.80 -1 , 3 3 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.007 4.62 -1 , 6 2 9 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.010 4.62 -1 , 6 2 9 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.013 5.44 1, 9 1 9 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.008 2.95 -1 , 0 3 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.008 3.80 -1 , 3 3 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.006 2.12 -7 4 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.002 2.12 -7 4 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fle x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 0 . 9 7 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 0 . 5 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 66 29 7 . 8 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 65 29 5 . 3 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 55 27 2 . 8 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 48 25 6 . 4 6 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 47 25 6 . 1 5 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 66 29 8 . 1 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 63 29 2 . 2 4 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 66 29 8 . 4 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 67 29 8 . 6 1 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 68 30 0 . 6 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 69 30 2 . 2 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 69 30 2 . 2 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 69 30 2 . 1 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 66 29 5 . 6 1 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 66 29 8 . 2 0 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 66 29 7 . 9 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 & J - 1 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 b : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 3 . 2 3 f t / s V =4 .0 8 f t /s V =4 .0 8 f t /s V =2 .4 1 f t /s V =9 .7 6 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =5 .7 6 f t /s V = 4 . 9 4 f t / s V= 3 . 2 3 f t / s V = 4 . 9 4 f t / s V= 1 . 5 6 f t / s V= 4 . 1 1 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.041 9.76 3, 4 4 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.066 4.08 1, 4 4 0 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.007 4.08 1, 4 4 0 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.006 1.91 30 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.009 4.11 -1 , 4 5 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.008 4.94 -1 , 7 4 0 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.011 4.94 -1 , 7 4 0 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.014 5.76 2, 0 3 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.005 2.41 85 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.002 1.56 55 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.013 3.23 1, 1 4 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.004 3.23 1, 1 4 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fle x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 1 . 1 0 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 0 . 7 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 66 29 8 . 4 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 66 29 8 . 3 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 66 29 7 . 9 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 66 29 7 . 5 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 65 29 7 . 2 6 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 66 29 7 . 8 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 63 29 2 . 0 0 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 66 29 7 . 7 9 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 66 29 8 . 0 3 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 68 30 0 . 3 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 69 30 2 . 1 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 69 30 2 . 1 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 69 30 2 . 0 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 66 29 5 . 5 1 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 66 29 7 . 8 2 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 66 29 8 . 3 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 & J - 1 2 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 D o me s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 c : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 2 . 3 8 f t / s V =3 .2 3 f t /s V =3 .2 3 f t /s V =1 .5 6 f t /s V =8 .9 0 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =6 .6 1 f t /s V = 5 . 7 9 f t / s V= 2 . 3 8 f t / s V = 0 . 1 2 f t / s V= 0 . 7 0 f t / s V= 0 . 7 0 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.034 8.90 3, 1 3 8 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.041 3.23 1, 1 3 8 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.004 3.23 1, 1 3 8 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.006 1.91 30 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.000 0.70 24 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.000 0.12 -4 2 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.015 5.79 -2 , 0 4 2 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.018 6.61 2, 3 3 2 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.002 1.56 54 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.000 0.70 24 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.007 2.38 83 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.002 2.38 83 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fle x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 1 . 4 2 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 1 . 1 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 67 29 9 . 7 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 67 29 9 . 6 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 67 29 9 . 2 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 66 29 8 . 8 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 66 29 8 . 5 4 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 67 29 9 . 4 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 64 29 3 . 5 2 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 67 29 9 . 3 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 67 29 9 . 3 6 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 67 29 9 . 3 6 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 1 . 9 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 69 30 1 . 8 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 69 30 1 . 8 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 66 29 5 . 2 3 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 67 29 9 . 3 7 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 67 29 9 . 6 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 & J - 1 4 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 d : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =1 4 .6 8 f t /s V = 1 . 2 6 f t / s V =7 .7 8 f t /s V =7 .7 8 f t /s V =0 .4 3 f t /s V =1 3 .4 6 f t /s V =6 .5 0 f t /s V =1 3 .4 1 f t /s V = 6 . 9 1 f t / s V= 1 . 2 6 f t / s V = 6 . 9 1 f t / s V= 0 . 4 2 f t / s V= 6 . 0 9 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 6 p s i P= 5 2 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 0 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 4 4 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 4 5 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.075 13.46 4, 7 4 3 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.237 7.78 2, 7 4 3 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.023 7.78 2, 7 4 3 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.128 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.346 14.68 2, 3 0 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.107 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.020 6.09 -2 , 1 4 7 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.015 6.91 -2 , 4 3 7 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.021 6.91 -2 , 4 3 7 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.069 13.41 4, 7 2 7 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.016 6.50 2, 2 9 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.000 0.43 15 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.000 0.42 -1 4 7 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.002 1.26 44 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.001 1.26 44 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 29 9 . 4 0 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 66 29 8 . 0 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 63 29 0 . 3 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 62 28 7 . 7 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 52 26 5 . 2 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 45 24 8 . 8 7 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 44 24 8 . 5 7 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 63 29 0 . 2 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 60 28 4 . 3 3 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 63 29 0 . 2 1 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 63 29 0 . 7 3 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 65 29 4 . 9 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 67 29 8 . 5 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 66 29 6 . 0 3 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 66 29 5 . 9 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 63 28 9 . 4 0 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 63 29 0 . 2 0 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 63 29 0 . 2 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 6 & J - 1 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 e : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =1 4 .6 8 f t /s V = 1 . 1 5 f t / s V =7 .6 8 f t /s V =7 .6 8 f t /s V =0 .3 3 f t /s V =7 .6 8 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =7 .8 4 f t /s V = 7 . 0 2 f t / s V= 1 . 1 5 f t / s V = 7 . 0 2 f t / s V= 0 . 5 2 f t / s V= 6 . 1 9 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 9 p s i P= 5 3 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 1 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 4 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 4 6 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.026 7.68 2, 7 0 7 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.231 7.68 2, 7 0 7 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.023 7.68 2, 7 0 7 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.128 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.346 14.68 2, 3 0 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.107 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.020 6.19 -2 , 1 8 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.016 7.02 -2 , 4 7 3 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.021 7.02 -2 , 4 7 3 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.025 7.84 2, 7 6 3 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.000 0.33 11 7 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.000 0.52 -1 8 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.002 1.15 40 7 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.001 1.15 40 7 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 1 . 8 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 0 . 5 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 64 29 2 . 9 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 63 29 0 . 4 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 53 26 7 . 9 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 46 25 1 . 5 4 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 45 25 1 . 2 4 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 64 29 2 . 8 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 61 28 7 . 0 1 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 64 29 2 . 8 9 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 64 29 3 . 4 3 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 67 29 7 . 7 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 1 . 4 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 69 30 1 . 4 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 69 30 1 . 3 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 66 29 4 . 7 8 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 64 29 2 . 8 9 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 64 29 2 . 9 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 6 & J - 1 2 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 D o me s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 f : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =1 4 .6 8 f t /s V = 0 . 0 8 f t / s V =6 .6 0 f t /s V =6 .6 0 f t /s V =0 .7 5 f t /s V =6 .6 0 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =8 .9 2 f t /s V = 8 . 0 9 f t / s V= 0 . 0 8 f t / s V = 2 . 4 2 f t / s V= 1 . 6 0 f t / s V= 1 . 6 0 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 5 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 4 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 4 7 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.019 6.60 2, 3 2 7 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.171 6.60 2, 3 2 7 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.017 6.60 2, 3 2 7 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.128 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.346 14.68 2, 3 0 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.107 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.002 1.60 -5 6 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.002 2.42 -8 5 3 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.028 8.09 -2 , 8 5 3 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.032 8.92 3, 1 4 3 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.001 0.75 -2 6 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.002 1.60 -5 6 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.000 0.08 27 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.000 0.08 27 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fle x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 2 . 1 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 1 . 2 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 65 29 5 . 4 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 64 29 2 . 9 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 54 27 0 . 4 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 47 25 4 . 0 7 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 46 25 3 . 7 7 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 65 29 5 . 4 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 62 28 9 . 6 2 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 65 29 5 . 5 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 65 29 5 . 5 8 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 66 29 6 . 1 9 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 1 . 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 68 30 0 . 9 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 68 30 0 . 8 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 65 29 4 . 3 2 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 65 29 5 . 5 0 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 65 29 5 . 4 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 6 & J - 1 4 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 g : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =1 4 .6 8 f t /s V = 1 . 0 9 f t / s V =5 .4 4 f t /s V =5 .4 4 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V =5 .4 4 f t /s V =6 .5 0 f t /s V =1 0 .0 8 f t /s V = 3 . 5 8 f t / s V= 1 . 0 9 f t / s V = 3 . 5 8 f t / s V= 2 . 7 6 f t / s V= 2 . 7 6 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 4 2 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 1 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 3 4 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 3 5 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.014 5.44 1, 9 1 7 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.116 5.44 1, 9 1 7 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.012 5.44 1, 9 1 7 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.128 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.819 14.68 2, 3 0 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.107 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.008 1.91 30 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.113 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.004 2.76 -9 7 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.005 3.58 -1 , 2 6 3 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.006 3.58 -1 , 2 6 3 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.041 10.08 3, 5 5 3 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.016 6.50 2, 2 9 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.107 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.003 1.91 -6 7 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.004 2.76 -9 7 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.002 1.09 -3 8 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.001 1.09 -3 8 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 2 . 4 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 68 30 1 . 8 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 66 29 7 . 8 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 65 29 5 . 3 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 42 24 2 . 0 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 35 22 5 . 6 3 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 34 22 4 . 5 4 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 66 29 7 . 9 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 61 28 7 . 5 8 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 66 29 8 . 0 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 66 29 8 . 1 6 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 67 29 9 . 4 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 0 . 4 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 67 29 7 . 9 4 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 67 29 7 . 8 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 62 28 6 . 8 6 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 66 29 7 . 9 4 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 66 29 7 . 8 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 0 & J - 1 2 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 h : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 5 . 3 3 f t / s V =6 .1 9 f t /s V =6 .1 9 f t /s V =4 .5 1 f t /s V =6 .1 9 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =9 .3 3 f t /s V = 8 . 5 1 f t / s V= 5 . 3 3 f t / s V = 2 . 8 4 f t / s V= 3 . 6 6 f t / s V= 2 . 0 1 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 0 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 5 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.017 6.19 2, 1 8 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.150 6.19 2, 1 8 0 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.015 6.19 2, 1 8 0 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.015 1.91 30 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.008 1.91 30 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.113 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.002 2.01 -7 1 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.003 2.84 -1 , 0 0 0 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.031 8.51 -3 , 0 0 0 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.035 9.33 3, 2 9 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.107 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.018 4.51 1, 5 9 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.008 3.66 1, 2 9 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.035 5.33 1, 8 8 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.011 5.33 1, 8 8 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 2 . 2 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 68 30 1 . 4 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 65 29 6 . 3 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 65 29 6 . 3 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 65 29 5 . 3 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 65 29 5 . 0 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 64 29 3 . 9 2 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 65 29 5 . 0 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 60 28 4 . 6 8 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 65 29 4 . 6 4 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 65 29 4 . 7 0 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 66 29 5 . 5 2 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 0 . 8 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 68 30 0 . 7 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 68 30 0 . 7 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 63 28 9 . 6 7 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 65 29 4 . 8 3 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 65 29 6 . 1 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 0 & J - 1 4 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 D o me s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 j : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 4 . 2 3 f t / s V =5 .0 8 f t /s V =5 .0 8 f t /s V =3 .4 1 f t /s V =5 .0 8 f t /s V =6 .5 0 f t /s V =1 0 .4 4 f t /s V = 3 . 9 4 f t / s V= 4 . 2 3 f t / s V = 3 . 9 4 f t / s V= 2 . 5 6 f t / s V= 3 . 1 2 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 1 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 6 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fle x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (ft/s) Fl o w (g p m ) Min o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.012 5.08 1, 7 9 1 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.102 5.08 1, 7 9 1 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.010 5.08 1, 7 9 1 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.015 1.91 30 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.008 1.91 30 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.113 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.005 3.12 -1 , 0 9 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.005 3.94 -1 , 3 8 9 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.007 3.94 -1 , 3 8 9 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.043 10.44 3, 6 7 9 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.016 6.50 2, 2 9 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.107 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.010 3.41 1, 2 0 1 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.004 2.56 90 1 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.022 4.23 1, 4 9 1 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.007 4.23 1, 4 9 1 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 2 . 5 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 68 30 1 . 9 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 66 29 8 . 4 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 66 29 8 . 4 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 66 29 7 . 4 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 66 29 7 . 1 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 64 29 6 . 0 1 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 66 29 7 . 5 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 61 28 7 . 2 6 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 66 29 7 . 3 9 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 66 29 7 . 5 4 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 67 29 9 . 0 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 0 . 2 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 67 29 7 . 7 6 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 67 29 7 . 6 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 62 28 6 . 6 7 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 66 29 7 . 4 9 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 66 29 8 . 3 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 2 & J - 1 4 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 D o me s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 k : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 3 . 6 7 f t / s V =4 .5 2 f t /s V =4 .5 2 f t /s V =2 .8 4 f t /s V =4 .5 2 f t /s V =6 .5 0 f t /s V =1 1 .0 0 f t /s V = 4 . 5 0 f t / s V= 3 . 6 7 f t / s V = 1 . 1 7 f t / s V= 1 . 9 9 f t / s V= 1 . 9 9 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 6 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.010 4.52 1, 5 9 2 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.081 4.52 1, 5 9 2 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.008 4.52 1, 5 9 2 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.015 1.91 30 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.008 1.91 30 0 14 . 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.113 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.002 1.99 70 2 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.001 1.17 41 2 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.009 4.50 -1 , 5 8 8 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.048 11.00 3, 8 7 8 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.016 6.50 2, 2 9 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.107 7.40 29 0 5. 4 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.007 2.84 1, 0 0 2 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.002 1.99 70 2 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.017 3.67 1, 2 9 2 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.005 3.67 1, 2 9 2 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 2 . 6 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 68 30 2 . 2 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 67 29 9 . 4 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 67 29 9 . 3 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 66 29 8 . 4 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 66 29 8 . 0 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 65 29 6 . 9 4 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 67 29 8 . 7 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 62 28 8 . 4 0 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 67 29 8 . 6 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 67 29 8 . 5 3 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 67 29 8 . 3 8 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 29 9 . 9 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 67 29 7 . 4 6 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 67 29 7 . 4 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 62 28 6 . 3 8 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 67 29 8 . 6 6 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 67 29 9 . 3 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 & J - 1 8 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 D o me s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 l : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 2 . 1 6 f t / s V =4 .3 7 f t /s V =4 .3 7 f t /s V =2 .9 8 f t /s V =1 0 .0 4 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =5 .4 8 f t /s V = 4 . 6 5 f t / s V= 3 . 5 2 f t / s V = 4 . 6 5 f t / s V= 3 . 8 3 f t / s V= 3 . 8 3 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.043 10.04 3, 5 4 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.075 4.37 1, 5 4 0 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.008 4.37 1, 5 4 0 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.006 1.91 30 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.008 3.83 -1 , 3 5 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.007 4.65 -1 , 6 4 0 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.010 4.65 -1 , 6 4 0 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.013 5.48 1, 9 3 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.008 2.98 -1 , 0 5 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.008 3.83 -1 , 3 5 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.015 3.52 1, 2 4 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.002 2.16 -7 6 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 0 . 9 8 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 0 . 5 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 66 29 7 . 9 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 66 29 7 . 8 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 66 29 7 . 4 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 66 29 7 . 0 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 65 29 6 . 7 8 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 66 29 8 . 0 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 63 29 2 . 1 7 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 66 29 8 . 3 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 67 29 8 . 5 5 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 68 30 0 . 5 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 69 30 2 . 2 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 69 30 2 . 2 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 69 30 2 . 1 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 66 29 5 . 6 0 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 66 29 8 . 1 3 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 66 29 7 . 8 4 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 6 & J - 1 8 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 D o me s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 m : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =1 4 .6 8 f t /s V = 2 . 1 2 f t / s V =4 .4 0 f t /s V =4 .4 0 f t /s V =2 .9 5 f t /s V =1 0 .0 7 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =5 .4 4 f t /s V = 4 . 6 2 f t / s V= 2 . 1 2 f t / s V = 4 . 6 2 f t / s V= 3 . 8 0 f t / s V= 3 . 8 0 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 4 . 6 8 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 9 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 4 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 4 8 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.043 10.07 3, 5 5 1 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.076 4.40 1, 5 5 1 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.008 4.40 1, 5 5 1 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.128 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.346 14.68 2, 3 0 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.107 14.68 2, 3 0 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.008 3.80 -1 , 3 3 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.007 4.62 -1 , 6 2 9 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.010 4.62 -1 , 6 2 9 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.013 5.44 1, 9 1 9 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.008 2.95 -1 , 0 3 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.008 3.80 -1 , 3 3 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.006 2.12 -7 4 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.002 2.12 -7 4 9 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 0 . 9 7 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 0 . 5 5 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 66 29 7 . 8 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 65 29 5 . 3 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 55 27 2 . 8 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 48 25 6 . 4 6 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 47 25 6 . 1 5 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 66 29 8 . 1 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 63 29 2 . 2 4 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 66 29 8 . 4 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 67 29 8 . 6 1 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 68 30 0 . 6 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 69 30 2 . 2 9 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 69 30 2 . 2 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 69 30 2 . 1 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 66 29 5 . 6 1 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 66 29 8 . 2 0 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 66 29 7 . 9 1 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 0 & J - 1 8 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 n : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 1 . 0 9 f t / s V =7 .6 2 f t /s V =7 .6 2 f t /s V =0 .2 7 f t /s V =7 .6 2 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =7 .9 0 f t /s V = 7 . 0 8 f t / s V= 6 . 7 7 f t / s V = 7 . 0 8 f t / s V= 0 . 5 8 f t / s V= 6 . 2 5 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 1 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 4 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.026 7.62 2, 6 8 5 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.227 7.62 2, 6 8 5 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.022 7.62 2, 6 8 5 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.006 1.91 30 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.021 6.25 -2 , 2 0 5 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.016 7.08 -2 , 4 9 5 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.022 7.08 -2 , 4 9 5 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.026 7.90 2, 7 8 5 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.000 0.27 95 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.000 0.58 -2 0 5 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.055 6.77 2, 3 8 5 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.001 1.09 38 5 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 1 . 8 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 0 . 6 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 64 29 3 . 1 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 64 29 3 . 0 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 64 29 2 . 6 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 64 29 2 . 2 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 63 29 1 . 9 7 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 64 29 2 . 7 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 61 28 6 . 8 4 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 64 29 2 . 7 2 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 64 29 3 . 2 8 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 66 29 7 . 7 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 1 . 4 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 69 30 1 . 3 8 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 69 30 1 . 3 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 66 29 4 . 7 5 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 64 29 2 . 7 2 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 64 29 2 . 7 8 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 2 & J - 1 8 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 o : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 0 . 0 2 f t / s V =6 .5 5 f t /s V =6 .5 5 f t /s V =0 .8 0 f t /s V =6 .5 5 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =8 .9 7 f t /s V = 8 . 1 5 f t / s V= 5 . 6 9 f t / s V = 2 . 4 8 f t / s V= 1 . 6 5 f t / s V= 1 . 6 5 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.019 6.55 2, 3 0 7 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.168 6.55 2, 3 0 7 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.017 6.55 2, 3 0 7 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.006 1.91 30 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.002 1.65 -5 8 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.002 2.48 -8 7 3 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.028 8.15 -2 , 8 7 3 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.033 8.97 3, 1 6 3 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.001 0.80 -2 8 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.002 1.65 -5 8 3 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.039 5.69 2, 0 0 7 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.000 0.02 7 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 2 . 1 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 67 30 1 . 2 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 65 29 5 . 6 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 65 29 5 . 5 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 65 29 5 . 1 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 65 29 4 . 7 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 64 29 4 . 4 7 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 65 29 5 . 3 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 62 28 9 . 5 0 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 65 29 5 . 4 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 65 29 5 . 4 7 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 66 29 6 . 1 0 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 0 . 9 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 68 30 0 . 9 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 68 30 0 . 8 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 65 29 4 . 2 9 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 65 29 5 . 3 8 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 65 29 5 . 3 7 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 4 & J - 1 8 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 7 , J - 1 7 Do m e s t i c J - 9 , J - 1 1 & J - 1 6 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 p : EX F H 1 FH # 3 FH - 4 FH - 5 EX F H 6 PH A S E - I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I S A N C O U R T PH A S E I I U N I O N S T R E E T FH - 2 P -5 P -4 P - 1 9 P -3 P -2 P -1 6 P -1 P -1 3 P -12 P - 1 1 P-1 8 P - 1 0 P- 1 7 P-9 P-8 P -7 P-15 P-6 P -1 4 8.0 i n 8 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4 .0 i n 8. 0 i n 4.0 in 8.0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V = 1 . 1 3 f t / s V =5 .4 0 f t /s V =5 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 5 f t /s V =5 .4 0 f t /s V =6 .5 0 f t /s V =1 0 .1 2 f t /s V = 3 . 6 2 f t / s V= 4 . 5 5 f t / s V = 3 . 6 2 f t / s V= 2 . 8 0 f t / s V= 2 . 8 0 f t / s V =7 .4 0 f t /s V =1 .9 1 f t /s V=7.40 ft/s V= 1 . 9 1 f t / s V =0 .8 2 f t /s J- 1 5 J- 5 J-4 J-3 J-2 J- 1 7 J- 1 J-1 4 J-1 3 J-1 8 J-1 2 J-1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J-8 J-7 J-1 6 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 6 p s i Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 , 0 0 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m Q= 3 0 0 g p m Q= 2 9 0 g p m Q= 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t HG L = 3 0 3 . 1 3 f t 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Headloss Gradient (ft/ft) Ve l o c i t y (f t / s ) Fl o w (g p m ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 0.013 5.40 1, 9 0 2 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.115 5.40 1, 9 0 2 1. 2 8 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.012 5.40 1, 9 0 2 1. 4 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 33 7 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.003 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 8. 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.006 1.91 30 0 4. 8 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 65 8. 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 15 4 8. 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.002 1.91 30 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 13 0 8. 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 7 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 92 4. 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.004 2.80 -9 8 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 9 0.005 3.62 -1 , 2 7 8 0. 0 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 27 4 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 0 0.006 3.62 -1 , 2 7 8 1. 2 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 17 1 12 . 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 1 0.041 10.12 3, 5 6 8 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 66 12 . 0 J- 1 3 R- 2 P- 1 2 0.016 6.50 2, 2 9 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 0 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 P- 1 3 0.000 0.82 29 0 0. 3 5 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 18 1 12 . 0 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 0.064 7.40 29 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 3 4. 0 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 5 0.003 1.95 -6 8 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 12 . 0 J- 1 7 J- 8 P- 1 6 0.005 2.80 -9 8 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 24 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 7 P- 1 7 0.025 4.55 1, 6 0 2 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 6 12 . 0 J- 1 8 J- 3 P- 1 8 0.001 1.13 -3 9 8 0. 3 5 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 1 8 P- 1 9 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (psi) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) De m a n d Co l l e c t i o n Zo n e Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 2 . 4 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 22 2 68 30 1 . 8 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 2 22 4 66 29 7 . 9 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 3 22 6 66 29 7 . 8 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 4 0 J- 4 22 8 66 29 7 . 4 4 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 5 23 0 66 29 7 . 0 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 0 J- 6 23 2 65 29 6 . 7 6 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 7 . 0 0 J- 7 23 4 66 29 7 . 8 2 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 0 0 J- 8 23 6 63 29 1 . 9 5 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 6 . 0 0 J- 9 23 8 66 29 7 . 9 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 0 24 0 66 29 8 . 0 9 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 2 67 29 9 . 3 7 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 2 24 4 68 30 0 . 4 3 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 3 24 6 67 29 7 . 9 2 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 4 24 9 67 29 7 . 8 6 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 0 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 2 . 6 0 J- 1 5 25 1 64 29 1 . 2 9 29 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 3 . 0 0 J- 1 6 25 3 66 29 7 . 8 6 30 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 7 27 1 66 29 7 . 7 6 2, 0 0 0 <C o l l e c t i o n : 1 it e m s > <N o n e > 14 5 . 3 8 J- 1 8 27 4 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r     Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire & Domestic Water Service Phase II AMB Platinum, LLC JPI Jefferson Stadium Park TTM P.M. 2015‐174 1969 S. State College Blvd. Anaheim, California 92805 January 11, 2016 Prepared By:      ATTESTATION This report has been prepared by, and under the direction of, the undersigned, a duly Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Except as noted, the undersigned attests to the technical information contained herein, and has judged to be acceptable the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data for this report, upon which findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based. ________________________________ ______________________ James H. Kawamura, P.E. Date: January 11, 2016 Registered Civil Engineer No. C30560 Exp. 3/31/16       i CONTENTS Attestation Design Criteria Design Assumptions HGL at Fixed Grade Node Calculations Average Water Demand Calculations Hydrants and Flow Test Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-5, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IA: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-5, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-7, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IB: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-7, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-8, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IC: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-8, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-10, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario ID: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-10, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-13, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IE: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-17, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IF: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-12, J-14, J-17, J-18 & J-21. ii Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-20, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IG: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-12, J-14, J-18, J-20 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-7, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IH: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-5, J-7, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-8, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IJ: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-5, J-8, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-10, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IK: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-5, J-10, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-13, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IL: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-5, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-17, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IM: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-5, J-12, J-14, J-17 J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-20, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IN: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-5, J-12, J-14, J-18, J-20 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-7, J-8, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IO: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-7, J-8, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-7, J-10, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IP: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-7, J-10, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. iii Fire hydrant @ junction J-7, J-13, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IQ: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-7, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-7, J-17, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IR: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-7, J-12, J-14, J-17, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-7, J-20, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IS: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-7, J-12, J-14, J-18, J-20 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-8, J-10, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IT: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-8, J-10, J-12, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-8, J-13, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IU: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-8, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-8, J-17, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IV: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-8, J-12, J-14, J-17, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-8, J-20, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IW: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-8, J-12, J-14, J-18, J-20 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-10, J-13, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IX: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-10, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-10, J-17, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IY: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-10, J-12, J-14, J-17, J-18 & J-21. iv Fire hydrant @ junction J-10, J-20, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IZ: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-10, J-12, J-14, J-18, J-20 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-13, J-17, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IIA: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-17, J-18 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-13, J-20, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IIB: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-12, J-13, J-14, J-18, J-20 & J-21. Fire hydrant @ junction J-17, J-20, fire sprinkler J-2, J-21 & Domestic Water @ J-12, J-14 & J-18 flowing simultaneously Scenario IIC: Adjustment for minor head losses. 5,480 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-12, J-14, J-17, J-18, J-20 & J-21. Hydraulic Network Software The software used to calculate the hydraulic network for the Project is Bentley WaterCAD V8i (Select 4), a water distribution modeling and management program by Haestad Methods, Solution Center., 27 Siemon Company Drive, Suite 200W Watertown, CT 06795 USA. Design Criteria: Maximum pressure at Nodes = 86.00 psi Static Pressure at State College Blvd. Maximum Pressure at Nodes = 80.00 Residual Pressure at Fire Hydrant Minimum pressure at Fire hydrant = 20 psi Fire flow demand: (2) 2,000 gpm fire hydrant at 20 psi. (Minimum allowable per 50% reduction for sprinkler system per UFC Appendix III for Type V - n hr. construction), Maximum fire area for Building type per Site plan. Sprinkler System Demand: maximum of 300 gpm (per Building Types) Pipeline friction factor (adjusted to include minor pipeline losses): Pipe Material PVC 150 Coefficient Pipe Material DIP 120 Coefficient Domestic Water Demand: Total number of Fixture Units per Building v Design Assumptions: Available pressure near site: Southwest corner State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way Flowed FH # 5298 and Residual City FH # 5297 Result of 86.00 Static Pressure, 80.00 psi Residual Pressure Head losses: 8” Reduced Pressure Assembly: 12.50 psi 4” Water Meter: 9.60 psi Node Elevations: Water lateral connections at 1’ below top of meter. Fire hydrant connections at 2.5’ above finished surface. HGL at Fixed Grade Nodes (FGN) Pressure Test: Flow test Hydrant location: Front of the Proposed Project in Gene Autry Way Available Pressure Residual = 80.00 psi at Elevation 149.80’ Date of flow test: September 9, 2015 Available head: I Available head @ pressure 80.00 psi: (Gene Autry Way) Elevation of measured hydrant 149.80 ft. Measure Pressure (psi) x 2.308 80 x 2.308 184.64 ft. Available Hydraulic Grade Line available 334.44 ft. Node R1 Available Hydraulic Grade line 334.44 ft. Elevation Node 150.80 ft. Difference 183.64 ft. Head Losses 12.50 psi = 12.50 x 2.308 -28.85 ft. Equal HGL at Fixed Grade Node 305.59 ft. Node R2 Available Hydraulic Grade line 334.44 ft. Elevation Node 149.60 ft. Difference 184.84 ft. Head Losses 12.50 psi = 12.50 x 2.308 -28.85 ft. Equal HGL at Fixed Grade Node 305.59 ft. Average Water Demand: Average Daily Demand ADD Building Fixture Units per UPC Maximum Day Demand (MDD) = 2.0xADD Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0xADD Fire Sprinkler Demand per Building 300 gpm Fire hydrant Demand= 1500 gpm (minimum)2000 gpm Average Water Demand  Total Demand Phase I Building A: per UPC ADD toilets 499 sinks 1172 1671 290 gpm Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0 x ADD 1160 gpm Maximum Day Demand (MDD) 2.0 x ADD 580 gpm (MDD) + Fire Flow Spinkler + Fire Hydrant 4880 gpm Phase II Building B: ADD toilets 511 sinks 1219 1730 295 gpm Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0 x ADD 1180 gpm Maximum Day Demand (MDD) 2.0 x ADD 590 gpm (MDD) + Fire Flow Spinkler + Fire Hydrant 4890 gpm Phase III Building B: ADD toilets 456 sinks 1076 1532 275 gpm Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0 x ADD 1100 gpm Maximum Day Demand (MDD) 2.0 x ADD 550 gpm (MDD) + Fire Flow Spinkler + Fire Hydrant 4850 gpm Maximum Pressure Peak Hour Demand Flow 45 psi Maximum Day Demand Plus Fire flow 20 psi Maximum Velocity Peak Hour Demand Flow 5.0 ft/sec Maximum Day Demand Plus Fire flow 10.0 ft/sec Fixture Units Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 5 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 a : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 1 . 4 9 f t / s V =0 .1 9 f t /s V =0 .1 9 f t /s V =1 .0 2 f t /s V =6 .8 6 f t /s V =1 .0 2 f t /s V= 0 . 6 7 f t / s V =1 .0 2 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =1 .4 9 f t /s V =6 .3 4 f t /s V =8 .6 8 f t /s V =1 .4 9 f t /s V =1 .4 9 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-5 2 5 g p m Q =6 5 g p m Q =6 5 g p m Q =3 6 0 g p m Q =-2 ,4 2 0 g p m Q =3 6 0 g p m Q =-2 3 5 g p m Q =3 6 0 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-5 2 5 g p m Q =2 ,2 3 5 g p m Q =3 ,0 6 0 g p m Q =-5 2 5 g p m Q= - 5 2 5 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 5 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.68 3,060 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 7.19 2,535 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 6.34 2,235 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.67 235 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.17 -60 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 1.02 360 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 1.02 360 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.02 360 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.02 360 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.02 360 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.19 65 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 1.49 -525 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 1.49 -525 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 1.49 -525 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.86 -2,420 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.19 65 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 0.67 -235 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 1.49 -525 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 1.49 -525 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 5.84 2,060 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 4 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 68 30 2 . 2 1 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 68 30 1 . 9 9 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 68 30 1 . 9 6 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 1 . 9 7 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 2 8 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 70 30 4 . 1 4 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 4 . 0 7 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 69 30 3 . 9 9 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 69 30 3 . 8 7 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 56 27 6 . 0 0 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 69 30 3 . 8 7 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 69 30 3 . 8 7 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 69 30 3 . 9 8 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 4 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 7 . 0 7 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 69 30 3 . 8 6 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 69 30 3 . 9 7 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 68 30 1 . 9 4 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 7 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 b : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 2 . 2 6 f t / s V =0 .5 8 f t /s V =0 .5 8 f t /s V =0 .2 5 f t /s V =7 .8 7 f t /s V =0 .2 5 f t /s V= 1 . 4 4 f t / s V =5 .9 3 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =2 .2 6 f t /s V =4 .5 7 f t /s V =7 .6 8 f t /s V =2 .2 6 f t /s V =2 .2 6 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-7 9 6 g p m Q =-2 0 6 g p m Q =-2 0 6 g p m Q =8 9 g p m Q =-2 ,7 7 4 g p m Q =8 9 g p m Q =-5 0 6 g p m Q =2 ,0 8 9 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-7 9 6 g p m Q =1 ,6 1 0 g p m Q =2 ,7 0 6 g p m Q =-7 9 6 g p m Q= - 7 9 6 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 5 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.68 2,706 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 5.42 1,910 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 4.57 1,610 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.11 -390 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.94 -685 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 5.93 2,089 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 0.25 89 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.25 89 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.25 89 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.25 89 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.58 -206 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 2.26 -796 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 2.26 -796 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 2.26 -796 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.87 -2,774 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 2 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.58 -206 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 1.44 -506 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 2.26 -796 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 2.26 -796 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.94 685 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 7 0 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 3 7 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 2 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 3 . 6 3 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 3 . 9 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 4 1 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 3 . 4 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 3 . 3 9 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 69 30 3 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 69 30 3 . 3 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 56 27 5 . 5 2 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 69 30 3 . 3 8 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 69 30 3 . 4 0 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 3 . 6 4 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 4 . 3 2 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 4 . 3 5 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 4 0 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 69 30 3 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 3 . 6 2 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 68 30 1 . 4 7 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 8 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 14 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 c : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 3 . 4 1 f t / s V =1 .7 4 f t /s V =1 .7 4 f t /s V =0 .9 0 f t /s V =7 .0 9 f t /s V =4 .7 7 f t /s V= 2 . 5 9 f t / s V =4 .7 7 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =3 .4 1 f t /s V =4 .1 9 f t /s V =8 .4 6 f t /s V =3 .4 1 f t /s V =3 .4 1 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,2 0 3 g p m Q =-6 1 3 g p m Q =-6 1 3 g p m Q =-3 1 8 g p m Q =-2 ,4 9 9 g p m Q =1 ,6 8 2 g p m Q =-9 1 3 g p m Q =1 ,6 8 2 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,2 0 3 g p m Q =1 ,4 7 8 g p m Q =2 ,9 8 1 g p m Q =-1 ,2 0 3 g p m Q= - 1 , 2 0 3 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.46 2,981 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 5.04 1,778 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 4.19 1,478 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.48 -522 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.32 -817 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 4.77 1,682 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 4.77 1,682 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.90 -318 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.90 -318 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.90 -318 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 1.74 -613 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 3.41 -1,203 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 3.41 -1,203 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 3.41 -1,203 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.09 -2,499 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 1.74 -613 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 2.59 -913 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 3.41 -1,203 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 3.41 -1,203 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 2.32 817 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 5 2 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 3 5 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 2 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 3 4 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 3 . 8 1 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 2 2 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 8 7 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 1 . 3 9 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 1 . 4 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 1 . 5 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 68 30 1 . 6 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 3 . 7 4 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 68 30 1 . 6 4 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 68 30 1 . 7 2 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 2 . 2 5 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 3 . 7 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 3 . 7 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 4 5 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 68 30 1 . 6 8 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 2 . 1 9 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 67 29 9 . 7 6 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 1 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e st i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 d FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 4 . 0 2 f t / s V =2 .3 5 f t /s V =2 .3 5 f t /s V =4 .1 7 f t /s V =6 .6 7 f t /s V =4 .1 7 f t /s V= 3 . 2 0 f t / s V =4 .1 7 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =4 .0 2 f t /s V =4 .0 1 f t /s V =8 .8 8 f t /s V =4 .0 2 f t /s V =4 .0 2 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,4 1 7 g p m Q =-8 2 7 g p m Q =-8 2 7 g p m Q =1 ,4 6 8 g p m Q =-2 ,3 5 1 g p m Q =1 ,4 6 8 g p m Q =-1 ,1 2 7 g p m Q =1 ,4 6 8 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,4 1 7 g p m Q =1 ,4 1 2 g p m Q =3 ,1 2 9 g p m Q =-1 ,4 1 7 g p m Q= - 1 , 4 1 7 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.88 3,129 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 4.86 1,712 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 4.01 1,412 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.67 -588 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.50 -883 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 4.17 1,468 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 4.17 1,468 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 4.17 1,468 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 4.17 1,468 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.51 -532 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.35 -827 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 4.02 -1,417 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 4.02 -1,417 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 4.02 -1,417 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.67 -2,351 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.35 -827 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 3.20 -1,127 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 4.02 -1,417 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 4.02 -1,417 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 2.50 883 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 4 2 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 3 3 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 2 4 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 3 5 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 3 . 8 9 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 3 7 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 1 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 2 . 1 7 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 1 . 2 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 0 . 1 7 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 30 0 . 4 3 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 2 . 5 7 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 30 0 . 5 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 30 0 . 6 3 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 1 . 3 4 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 3 . 3 1 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 3 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 4 5 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 30 0 . 5 6 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 1 . 2 6 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 8 . 6 4 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 1 3 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 e : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 4 . 4 6 f t / s V =2 .8 8 f t /s V =2 .7 9 f t /s V =3 .7 2 f t /s V =6 .3 6 f t /s V =3 .7 2 f t /s V= 3 . 6 4 f t / s V =3 .7 2 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =4 .4 6 f t /s V =3 .8 7 f t /s V =9 .1 9 f t /s V =4 .4 6 f t /s V =4 .4 6 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,5 7 4 g p m Q =1 ,0 1 6 g p m Q =-9 8 4 g p m Q =1 ,3 1 1 g p m Q =-2 ,2 4 1 g p m Q =1 ,3 1 1 g p m Q =-1 ,2 8 4 g p m Q =1 ,3 1 1 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,5 7 4 g p m Q =1 ,3 6 5 g p m Q =3 ,2 3 9 g p m Q =-1 ,5 7 4 g p m Q= - 1 , 5 7 4 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 9.19 3,239 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 4.72 1,665 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 3.87 1,365 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.80 -635 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.64 -930 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.72 1,311 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 3.72 1,311 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.72 1,311 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.72 1,311 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.72 1,311 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.88 1,016 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 4.46 -1,574 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 4.46 -1,574 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 4.46 -1,574 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.36 -2,241 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.79 -984 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 3.64 -1,284 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 4.46 -1,574 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 4.46 -1,574 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 2.64 930 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 3 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 3 1 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 2 2 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 3 5 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 3 . 9 4 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 4 7 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 2 5 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 2 . 6 9 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 1 . 9 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 1 . 0 7 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 29 9 . 6 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 1 . 7 9 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 29 9 . 5 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 29 9 . 7 3 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 0 . 5 9 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 3 . 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 3 . 0 9 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 4 5 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 29 9 . 6 5 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 0 . 5 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 7 . 7 2 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 1 7 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 14 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 f : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 0 . 0 6 f t / s V =1 .7 3 f t /s V =1 .7 3 f t /s V =2 .5 7 f t /s V =5 .5 4 f t /s V =2 .5 7 f t /s V= 0 . 8 8 f t / s V =2 .5 7 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =5 .6 1 f t /s V =3 .5 4 f t /s V =1 0 .0 1 f t /s V =0 .0 6 f t /s V =0 .0 6 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =2 1 g p m Q =6 1 1 g p m Q =6 1 1 g p m Q =9 0 6 g p m Q =-1 ,9 5 3 g p m Q =9 0 6 g p m Q =3 1 1 g p m Q =9 0 6 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,9 7 9 g p m Q =1 ,2 4 8 g p m Q =3 ,5 2 7 g p m Q =2 1 g p m Q= 2 1 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 5 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 10.01 3,527 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 4.39 1,548 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 3.54 1,248 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.13 -752 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.97 -1,047 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 2.57 906 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 2.57 906 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.57 906 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.57 906 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 2.57 906 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 1.73 611 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 0.06 21 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 0.06 21 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 5.61 -1,979 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 5.54 -1,953 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 1.73 611 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 0.88 311 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 0.06 21 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 0.06 21 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 2.97 1,047 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 69 30 4 . 1 2 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 2 2 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 1 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 3 3 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 0 6 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 7 2 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 6 2 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 3 . 8 3 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 3 . 4 5 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 69 30 3 . 0 1 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 68 30 2 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 56 27 4 . 4 4 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 68 30 2 . 2 6 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 68 30 2 . 2 2 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 2 . 2 2 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 2 2 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 2 . 2 2 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 4 3 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 68 30 2 . 2 2 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 2 . 2 2 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 67 30 0 . 3 0 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 2 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o me s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 g : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 4 . 7 2 f t / s V =2 .6 4 f t /s V =2 .6 4 f t /s V =3 .4 8 f t /s V =6 .1 9 f t /s V =3 .4 8 f t /s V= 1 . 7 9 f t / s V =3 .4 8 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =4 .7 2 f t /s V =3 .8 0 f t /s V =9 .3 7 f t /s V =4 .7 2 f t /s V =4 .7 2 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,6 6 3 g p m Q =9 3 2 g p m Q =9 3 2 g p m Q =1 ,2 2 7 g p m Q =-2 ,1 8 2 g p m Q =1 ,2 2 7 g p m Q =6 3 2 g p m Q =1 ,2 2 7 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,6 6 3 g p m Q =1 ,3 3 9 g p m Q =3 ,3 0 3 g p m Q =-1 ,6 6 3 g p m Q= - 1 , 6 6 3 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 9.37 3,303 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 4.65 1,639 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 3.80 1,339 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.87 -661 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.71 -956 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.48 1,227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 3.48 1,227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.48 1,227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.48 1,227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.48 1,227 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.64 932 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 4.72 -1,663 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 4.72 -1,663 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 4.72 -1,663 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.19 -2,182 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.64 932 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 1.79 632 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 0.96 337 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 4.72 -1,663 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 2.71 956 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 2 9 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 2 1 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 3 5 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 3 . 9 7 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 5 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 3 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 2 . 9 5 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 2 . 2 9 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 1 . 5 2 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 30 0 . 2 7 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 2 . 4 1 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 30 0 . 1 8 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 30 0 . 0 8 29 5 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 0 . 1 4 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 8 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 2 . 9 1 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 4 5 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 30 0 . 1 0 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 0 . 0 4 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 8 . 1 8 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 7 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 h : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 2 . 5 9 f t / s V =0 .9 2 f t /s V =0 .9 2 f t /s V =0 .0 8 f t /s V =8 .6 6 f t /s V =0 .0 8 f t /s V= 1 . 7 7 f t / s V =5 .5 9 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =2 .5 9 f t /s V =3 .4 4 f t /s V =6 .8 9 f t /s V =2 .5 9 f t /s V =2 .5 9 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-9 1 3 g p m Q =-3 2 3 g p m Q =-3 2 3 g p m Q =-2 8 g p m Q =-3 ,0 5 3 g p m Q =-2 8 g p m Q =-6 2 3 g p m Q =1 ,9 7 2 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-9 1 3 g p m Q =1 ,2 1 4 g p m Q =2 ,4 2 7 g p m Q =-9 1 3 g p m Q= - 9 1 3 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 5 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 6.89 2,427 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 4.29 1,514 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 3.44 1,214 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 3.44 1,214 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.61 919 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 5.59 1,972 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 0.08 -28 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.08 -28 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.08 -28 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.08 -28 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.92 -323 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 2.59 -913 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 2.59 -913 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 2.59 -913 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 8.66 -3,053 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 2 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.92 -323 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 1.77 -623 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 2.59 -913 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 2.59 -913 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 3.07 1,081 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 8 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 0 0 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 9 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 4 8 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 2 . 9 1 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 3 . 6 1 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 1 4 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 3 . 1 4 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 3 . 1 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 69 30 3 . 1 4 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 69 30 3 . 1 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 56 27 5 . 2 8 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 69 30 3 . 1 6 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 68 30 3 . 1 9 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 3 . 5 0 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 4 . 3 7 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 4 . 4 1 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 5 8 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 68 30 3 . 1 7 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 3 . 4 7 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 68 30 1 . 2 5 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 8 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e st i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 j : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 3 . 5 8 f t / s V =1 .9 0 f t /s V =1 .9 0 f t /s V =1 .0 7 f t /s V =7 .9 7 f t /s V =4 .6 1 f t /s V= 2 . 7 5 f t / s V =4 .6 1 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =3 .5 8 f t /s V =3 .1 5 f t /s V =7 .5 8 f t /s V =3 .5 8 f t /s V =3 .5 8 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,2 6 0 g p m Q =-6 7 0 g p m Q =-6 7 0 g p m Q =-3 7 5 g p m Q =-2 ,8 0 8 g p m Q =1 ,6 2 5 g p m Q =-9 7 0 g p m Q =1 ,6 2 5 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,2 6 0 g p m Q =1 ,1 1 1 g p m Q =2 ,6 7 2 g p m Q =-1 ,2 6 0 g p m Q= - 1 , 2 6 0 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.58 2,672 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 4.00 1,411 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 3.15 1,111 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 3.15 1,111 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.32 816 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 4.61 1,625 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 4.61 1,625 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.07 -375 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.07 -375 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.07 -375 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 1.90 -670 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 3.58 -1,260 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 3.58 -1,260 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 3.58 -1,260 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.97 -2,808 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 2 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 1.90 -670 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 2.75 -970 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 3.58 -1,260 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 3.58 -1,260 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 3.36 1,184 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 7 2 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 9 6 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 9 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 5 2 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 3 . 0 6 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 3 . 8 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 5 7 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 1 . 2 3 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 1 . 3 1 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 1 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 68 30 1 . 5 3 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 3 . 6 7 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 68 30 1 . 5 8 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 68 30 1 . 6 7 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 2 . 2 4 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 3 . 8 3 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 3 . 8 9 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 6 2 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 68 30 1 . 6 2 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 2 . 1 8 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 67 29 9 . 7 0 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 1 0 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 k : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 4 . 1 5 f t / s V =2 .4 7 f t /s V =2 .4 7 f t /s V =4 .0 4 f t /s V =7 .5 6 f t /s V =4 .0 4 f t /s V= 3 . 3 3 f t / s V =4 .0 4 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =4 .1 5 f t /s V =2 .9 8 f t /s V =7 .9 8 f t /s V =4 .1 5 f t /s V =4 .1 5 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,4 6 2 g p m Q =-8 7 2 g p m Q =-8 7 2 g p m Q =1 ,4 2 3 g p m Q =-2 ,6 6 7 g p m Q =1 ,4 2 3 g p m Q =-1 ,1 7 2 g p m Q =1 ,4 2 3 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,4 6 2 g p m Q =1 ,0 5 1 g p m Q =2 ,8 1 3 g p m Q =-1 ,4 6 2 g p m Q= - 1 , 4 6 2 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.98 2,813 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.83 1,351 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.98 1,051 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.98 1,051 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.15 756 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 4.04 1,423 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 4.04 1,423 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 4.04 1,423 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 4.04 1,423 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.64 -577 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.47 -872 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 4.15 -1,462 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 4.15 -1,462 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 4.15 -1,462 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.56 -2,667 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.47 -872 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 3.33 -1,172 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 4.15 -1,462 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 4.15 -1,462 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 3.53 1,244 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 6 3 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 9 3 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 8 8 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 5 3 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 3 . 1 3 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 0 5 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 7 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 1 . 9 7 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 1 . 1 0 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 0 . 0 8 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 30 0 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 2 . 5 3 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 30 0 . 4 7 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 30 0 . 6 1 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 1 . 3 6 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 3 . 4 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 3 . 5 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 6 3 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 30 0 . 5 4 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 1 . 2 8 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 8 . 6 2 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 1 3 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e st i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 l : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 5 . 0 5 f t / s V =3 .1 4 f t /s V =2 .5 4 f t /s V =3 .9 7 f t /s V =7 .6 2 f t /s V =3 .9 7 f t /s V= 4 . 2 3 f t / s V =3 .9 7 f t /s V= 0 . 0 0 f t / s V =5 .0 5 f t /s V =2 .8 7 f t /s V =8 .7 6 f t /s V =5 .0 5 f t /s V =5 .0 5 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,7 8 0 g p m Q =1 ,1 0 5 g p m Q =-8 9 5 g p m Q =1 ,4 0 0 g p m Q =-2 ,6 8 6 g p m Q =1 ,4 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,4 9 0 g p m Q =1 ,4 0 0 g p m Q =0 g p m Q =-1 ,7 8 0 g p m Q =1 ,0 1 0 g p m Q =3 ,0 8 9 g p m Q =-1 ,7 8 0 g p m Q= - 1 , 7 8 0 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 4 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.76 3,089 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.72 1,310 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.87 1,010 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.87 1,010 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.03 715 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.97 1,400 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 3.97 1,400 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.97 1,400 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.97 1,400 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.97 1,400 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 3.14 1,105 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 5.05 -1,780 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 5.05 -1,780 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 5.05 -1,780 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 0.00 0 22 . 1 8 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.62 -2,686 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.54 -895 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 4.23 -1,490 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 5.05 -1,780 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 5.05 -1,780 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 3.65 1,285 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 4 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 7 8 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 7 4 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 4 2 29 5 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 3 . 0 6 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 0 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 7 8 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 2 . 0 1 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 1 . 1 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 0 . 1 8 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 29 8 . 5 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 54 27 0 . 7 2 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 29 8 . 4 6 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 66 29 8 . 6 5 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 29 9 . 7 4 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 7 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 2 . 8 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 69 30 3 . 4 2 0 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 66 29 8 . 5 4 29 5 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 29 9 . 6 2 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 6 . 6 2 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 1 7 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 m : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 0 . 1 4 f t / s V =1 .5 3 f t /s V =1 .5 3 f t /s V =2 .3 7 f t /s V =6 .4 0 f t /s V =2 .3 7 f t /s V= 0 . 6 8 f t / s V =2 .3 7 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =5 .8 1 f t /s V =2 .4 8 f t /s V =9 .1 4 f t /s V =0 .1 4 f t /s V =0 .1 4 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-5 0 g p m Q =5 4 0 g p m Q =5 4 0 g p m Q =8 3 5 g p m Q =-2 ,2 5 6 g p m Q =8 3 5 g p m Q =2 4 0 g p m Q =8 3 5 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,0 5 0 g p m Q =8 7 4 g p m Q =3 ,2 2 4 g p m Q =-5 0 g p m Q= - 5 0 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 5 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 9.14 3,224 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.33 1,174 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.48 874 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.48 874 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.64 579 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 2.37 835 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 2.37 835 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.37 835 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.37 835 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 2.37 835 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 1.53 540 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 0.14 -50 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 0.14 -50 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 5.81 -2,050 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.40 -2,256 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 1.53 540 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 0.68 240 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 0.14 -50 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 0.14 -50 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 4.03 1,421 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 3 5 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 8 1 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 7 7 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 5 3 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 3 . 2 9 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 4 6 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 3 7 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 3 . 6 9 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 3 . 3 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 69 30 2 . 9 9 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 68 30 2 . 3 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 56 27 4 . 5 1 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 68 30 2 . 3 4 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 68 30 2 . 3 1 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 2 . 3 1 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 3 2 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 2 . 3 2 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 6 3 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 68 30 2 . 3 1 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 2 . 3 1 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 67 30 0 . 3 9 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 2 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o me s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 n : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 4 . 8 4 f t / s V =2 .5 1 f t /s V =2 .5 1 f t /s V =3 .3 5 f t /s V =7 .0 8 f t /s V =3 .3 5 f t /s V= 1 . 6 6 f t / s V =3 .3 5 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =4 .8 4 f t /s V =2 .7 8 f t /s V =8 .4 6 f t /s V =4 .8 4 f t /s V =4 .8 4 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,7 0 5 g p m Q =8 8 5 g p m Q =8 8 5 g p m Q =1 ,1 8 0 g p m Q =-2 ,4 9 7 g p m Q =1 ,1 8 0 g p m Q =5 8 5 g p m Q =1 ,1 8 0 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,7 0 5 g p m Q =9 7 8 g p m Q =2 ,9 8 3 g p m Q =-1 ,7 0 5 g p m Q= - 1 , 7 0 5 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.46 2,983 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.63 1,278 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.78 978 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.78 978 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.94 683 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.35 1,180 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 3.35 1,180 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.35 1,180 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.35 1,180 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.35 1,180 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.51 885 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 4.84 -1,705 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 4.84 -1,705 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 4.84 -1,705 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.08 -2,497 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.51 885 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 1.66 585 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 0.84 295 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 4.84 -1,705 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 3.74 1,317 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 5 2 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 8 9 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 8 4 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 5 4 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 3 . 2 1 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 2 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 0 5 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 2 . 7 6 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 2 . 1 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 1 . 4 3 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 30 0 . 2 7 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 2 . 4 1 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 30 0 . 1 9 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 30 0 . 1 0 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 0 . 1 7 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 9 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 3 . 0 7 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 8 . 6 4 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 30 0 . 1 1 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 0 . 0 6 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 8 . 1 9 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 7 , J - 8 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 o : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 3 . 9 8 f t / s V =2 .3 0 f t /s V =2 .3 0 f t /s V =1 .4 7 f t /s V =8 .4 2 f t /s V =4 .2 1 f t /s V= 3 . 1 5 f t / s V =9 .8 8 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =3 .9 8 f t /s V =2 .3 0 f t /s V =7 .1 3 f t /s V =3 .9 8 f t /s V =3 .9 8 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,4 0 2 g p m Q =-8 1 2 g p m Q =-8 1 2 g p m Q =-5 1 7 g p m Q =-2 ,9 6 8 g p m Q =1 ,4 8 3 g p m Q =-1 ,1 1 2 g p m Q =3 ,4 8 3 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,4 0 2 g p m Q =8 1 0 g p m Q =2 ,5 1 2 g p m Q =-1 ,4 0 2 g p m Q= - 1 , 4 0 2 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.13 2,512 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.15 1,110 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.30 810 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.30 810 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.46 515 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 9.88 3,483 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 4.21 1,483 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.47 -517 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.47 -517 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.47 -517 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.30 -812 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 3.98 -1,402 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 3.98 -1,402 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 3.98 -1,402 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 8.42 -2,968 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 2 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.30 -812 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 3.15 -1,112 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 3.98 -1,402 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 3.98 -1,402 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.46 -515 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 8 1 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 3 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 0 9 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 3 . 8 9 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 3 . 7 1 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 68 30 2 . 3 4 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 0 . 3 7 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 0 . 5 0 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 0 . 6 6 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 68 30 0 . 9 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 3 . 0 4 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 68 30 0 . 9 7 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 68 30 1 . 1 0 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 1 . 7 9 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 3 . 7 3 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 3 . 8 1 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 9 . 1 9 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 68 30 1 . 0 3 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 1 . 7 2 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 67 29 9 . 1 1 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 7 , J - 1 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o me s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 p : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 4 . 4 8 f t / s V =2 .8 0 f t /s V =2 .8 0 f t /s V =3 .7 1 f t /s V =8 .1 2 f t /s V =3 .7 1 f t /s V= 3 . 6 5 f t / s V =9 .3 8 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =4 .4 8 f t /s V =2 .1 0 f t /s V =7 .4 2 f t /s V =4 .4 8 f t /s V =4 .4 8 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,5 7 8 g p m Q =-9 8 8 g p m Q =-9 8 8 g p m Q =1 ,3 0 7 g p m Q =-2 ,8 6 3 g p m Q =1 ,3 0 7 g p m Q =-1 ,2 8 8 g p m Q =3 ,3 0 7 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,5 7 8 g p m Q =7 3 9 g p m Q =2 ,6 1 7 g p m Q =-1 ,5 7 8 g p m Q= - 1 , 5 7 8 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.42 2,617 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.95 1,039 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.10 739 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.10 739 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.26 444 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 9.38 3,307 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 3.71 1,307 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.71 1,307 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.71 1,307 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.97 -693 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.80 -988 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 4.48 -1,578 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 4.48 -1,578 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 4.48 -1,578 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 8.12 -2,863 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 2 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.80 -988 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 3.65 -1,288 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 4.48 -1,578 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 4.48 -1,578 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.26 -444 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 7 5 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 2 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 1 2 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 3 . 9 7 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 3 . 8 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 2 . 5 9 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 1 . 0 3 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 0 . 2 8 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 67 29 9 . 4 2 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 29 9 . 8 5 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 1 . 9 9 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 29 9 . 9 4 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 30 0 . 1 2 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 0 . 9 9 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 69 30 3 . 4 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 3 . 5 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 9 . 2 2 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 30 0 . 0 4 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 0 . 8 9 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 8 . 1 2 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 7 , J - 1 3 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o me s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 q : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 4 . 8 9 f t / s V =2 .4 6 f t /s V =3 .2 1 f t /s V =3 .3 0 f t /s V =7 .8 9 f t /s V =3 .3 0 f t /s V= 4 . 0 6 f t / s V =8 .9 7 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =4 .8 9 f t /s V =1 .9 2 f t /s V =7 .6 6 f t /s V =4 .8 9 f t /s V =4 .8 9 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,7 2 2 g p m Q =8 6 8 g p m Q =-1 ,1 3 2 g p m Q =1 ,1 6 3 g p m Q =-2 ,7 8 0 g p m Q =1 ,1 6 3 g p m Q =-1 ,4 3 2 g p m Q =3 ,1 6 3 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,7 2 2 g p m Q =6 7 8 g p m Q =2 ,7 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,7 2 2 g p m Q= - 1 , 7 2 2 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 4 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.66 2,700 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.77 978 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.92 678 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.92 678 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.09 383 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 8.97 3,163 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 3.30 1,163 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.30 1,163 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.30 1,163 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.30 1,163 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.46 868 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 4.89 -1,722 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 4.89 -1,722 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 4.89 -1,722 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.89 -2,780 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 2 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 3.21 -1,132 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 4.06 -1,432 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 4.89 -1,722 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 4.89 -1,722 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.09 -383 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 7 0 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 2 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 1 4 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 0 3 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 3 . 9 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 2 . 7 8 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 1 . 5 3 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 0 . 9 3 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 0 . 2 3 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 29 9 . 1 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 54 27 1 . 2 4 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 29 9 . 0 3 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 29 9 . 2 5 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 0 . 2 7 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 3 . 1 1 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 69 30 3 . 2 3 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 9 . 2 4 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 29 9 . 1 5 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 0 . 1 6 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 7 . 2 2 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 7 , J - 1 7 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 r : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 0 . 6 4 f t / s V =1 .0 3 f t /s V =1 .0 3 f t /s V =1 .8 7 f t /s V =7 .1 5 f t /s V =1 .8 7 f t /s V= 0 . 1 8 f t / s V =7 .5 4 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =6 .3 2 f t /s V =1 .2 3 f t /s V =8 .3 9 f t /s V =0 .6 4 f t /s V =0 .6 4 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-2 2 7 g p m Q =3 6 3 g p m Q =3 6 3 g p m Q =6 5 8 g p m Q =-2 ,5 2 1 g p m Q =6 5 8 g p m Q =6 3 g p m Q =2 ,6 5 8 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,2 2 7 g p m Q =4 3 2 g p m Q =2 ,9 5 9 g p m Q =-2 2 7 g p m Q= - 2 2 7 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 5 6 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.39 2,959 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.08 732 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.23 432 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.23 432 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.39 137 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 7.54 2,658 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 1.87 658 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.87 658 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.87 658 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.87 658 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 1.03 363 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 0.64 -227 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 0.64 -227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 6.32 -2,227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.15 -2,521 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 1.03 363 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 0.18 63 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 0.64 -227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 0.64 -227 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.39 -137 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 5 3 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 1 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 2 3 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 2 2 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 2 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 3 8 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 2 . 9 4 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 69 30 2 . 7 3 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 69 30 2 . 4 9 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 68 30 2 . 1 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 56 27 4 . 2 4 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 68 30 2 . 0 8 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 68 30 2 . 0 7 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 68 30 2 . 0 9 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 1 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 2 . 1 6 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 3 3 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 68 30 2 . 0 7 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 68 30 2 . 0 9 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 67 30 0 . 1 5 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 7 , J - 2 0 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 s : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 5 . 1 6 f t / s V =2 .1 8 f t /s V =2 .1 8 f t /s V =3 .0 2 f t /s V =7 .7 3 f t /s V =3 .0 2 f t /s V= 1 . 3 3 f t / s V =8 .7 0 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =5 .1 6 f t /s V =1 .8 0 f t /s V =7 .8 1 f t /s V =5 .1 6 f t /s V =5 .1 6 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,8 2 0 g p m Q =7 7 0 g p m Q =7 7 0 g p m Q =1 ,0 6 5 g p m Q =-2 ,7 2 5 g p m Q =1 ,0 6 5 g p m Q =4 7 0 g p m Q =3 ,0 6 5 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-1 ,8 2 0 g p m Q =6 3 5 g p m Q =2 ,7 5 5 g p m Q =-1 ,8 2 0 g p m Q= - 1 , 8 2 0 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.81 2,755 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.65 935 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.80 635 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.80 635 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.96 340 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 8.70 3,065 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 3.02 1,065 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.02 1,065 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.02 1,065 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.02 1,065 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 2.18 770 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 5.16 -1,820 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 5.16 -1,820 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 5.16 -1,820 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.73 -2,725 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 2 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 2.18 770 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 1.33 470 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 0.51 180 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 5.16 -1,820 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.96 -340 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 6 7 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 1 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 1 6 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 0 7 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 3 . 9 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 2 . 9 1 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 1 . 8 4 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 1 . 3 3 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 68 30 0 . 7 4 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 29 9 . 7 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 1 . 9 2 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 29 9 . 7 2 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 29 9 . 6 5 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 29 9 . 7 6 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 9 1 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 3 . 0 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 58 27 9 . 2 6 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 29 9 . 6 6 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 29 9 . 6 4 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 7 . 7 4 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 8 , J - 1 0 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 t : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 9 .1 5 f t /s V= 9 . 7 2 f t / s V =0 .3 9 f t /s V =0 .3 9 f t /s V =6 .1 2 f t /s V =1 0 .3 9 f t /s V =1 1 .8 0 f t /s V= 8 . 9 0 f t / s V =1 1 .8 0 f t /s V= 0 . 0 0 f t / s V =9 .7 2 f t /s V =1 .4 1 f t /s V =1 1 .9 8 f t /s V =9 .7 2 f t /s V =9 .7 2 f t /s Q =3 ,0 0 0 g p m Q =-3 ,4 2 6 g p m Q =-1 3 6 g p m Q =-1 3 6 g p m Q =2 ,1 5 9 g p m Q =-3 ,6 6 2 g p m Q =4 ,1 5 9 g p m Q =-3 ,1 3 6 g p m Q =4 ,1 5 9 g p m Q =0 g p m Q =-3 ,4 2 6 g p m Q =4 9 7 g p m Q =4 ,2 2 3 g p m Q =-3 ,4 2 6 g p m Q= - 3 , 4 2 6 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 1 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 0 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 0 p s i P= 6 0 p s i P= 4 8 p s i P= 6 0 p s i P= 6 0 p s i P= 6 1 p s i P= 6 2 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= - 2 0 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 11.98 4,223 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 5 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.26 797 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.41 497 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.41 497 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.41 497 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 11.80 4,159 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 5 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 11.80 4,159 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 4 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 6.12 2,159 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 6.12 2,159 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.45 159 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.39 -136 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 9.72 -3,426 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 3 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 9.72 -3,426 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 6 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 9.72 -3,426 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 0.00 0 22 . 1 8 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 10.39 -3,662 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 3 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.39 -136 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 8.90 -3,136 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 4 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 9.72 -3,426 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 9.72 -3,426 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 7 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 19.15 3,000 28 . 8 8 0 1. 5 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.41 -497 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 69 30 3 . 5 3 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 3 . 2 7 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 3 . 2 5 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 3 . 1 7 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 68 30 2 . 9 9 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 2 . 8 2 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 68 30 0 . 9 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 62 28 7 . 5 5 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 61 28 5 . 6 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 60 28 3 . 4 6 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 60 28 3 . 4 3 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 48 25 5 . 5 7 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 60 28 3 . 4 3 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 60 28 3 . 9 0 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 62 28 7 . 6 0 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 66 29 7 . 8 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 66 29 8 . 2 5 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 69 30 3 . 1 7 0 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 60 28 3 . 4 4 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 61 28 7 . 1 8 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 -2 0 99 . 3 5 3, 0 0 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 8 , J - 1 3 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o me s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 u : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 6 . 0 7 f t / s V =1 .2 8 f t /s V =4 .3 9 f t /s V =2 .1 2 f t /s V =7 .2 7 f t /s V =7 .7 9 f t /s V= 5 . 2 5 f t / s V =7 .7 9 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =6 .0 7 f t /s V =1 .3 6 f t /s V =8 .2 8 f t /s V =6 .0 7 f t /s V =6 .0 7 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-2 ,1 3 9 g p m Q =4 5 1 g p m Q =-1 ,5 4 9 g p m Q =7 4 6 g p m Q =-2 ,5 6 1 g p m Q =2 ,7 4 6 g p m Q =-1 ,8 4 9 g p m Q =2 ,7 4 6 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,1 3 9 g p m Q =4 8 0 g p m Q =2 ,9 1 9 g p m Q =-2 ,1 3 9 g p m Q= - 2 , 1 3 9 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 5 3 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.28 2,919 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.21 780 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.36 480 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.36 480 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.52 185 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 7.79 2,746 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 7.79 2,746 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.12 746 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.12 746 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 2.12 746 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 1.28 451 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 6.07 -2,139 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 1 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 6.07 -2,139 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 6.07 -2,139 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.27 -2,561 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 4.39 -1,549 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 5.25 -1,849 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 6.07 -2,139 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 6.07 -2,139 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.52 -185 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 5 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 1 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 2 2 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 1 9 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 1 6 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 2 8 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 66 29 7 . 1 0 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 66 29 6 . 8 4 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 66 29 6 . 5 3 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 65 29 6 . 0 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 53 26 8 . 1 8 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 65 29 6 . 0 2 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 66 29 6 . 4 0 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 66 29 7 . 9 3 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 2 . 1 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 2 . 3 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 3 2 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 65 29 6 . 2 3 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 66 29 7 . 7 6 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 65 29 4 . 3 1 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 8 , J - 1 7 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 v : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 2 . 1 6 f t / s V =0 .4 9 f t /s V =0 .4 9 f t /s V =0 .3 5 f t /s V =6 .6 0 f t /s V =6 .0 3 f t /s V= 1 . 3 4 f t / s V =6 .0 3 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =7 .8 3 f t /s V =0 .2 6 f t /s V =8 .9 4 f t /s V =2 .1 6 f t /s V =2 .1 6 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-7 6 1 g p m Q =-1 7 1 g p m Q =-1 7 1 g p m Q =1 2 4 g p m Q =-2 ,3 2 8 g p m Q =2 ,1 2 4 g p m Q =-4 7 1 g p m Q =2 ,1 2 4 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,7 6 1 g p m Q =9 1 g p m Q =3 ,1 5 2 g p m Q =-7 6 1 g p m Q= - 7 6 1 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 5 5 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.94 3,152 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 1.11 391 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.26 91 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.26 91 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.58 -204 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 6.03 2,124 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 6.03 2,124 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.35 124 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.35 124 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.35 124 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.49 -171 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 2.16 -761 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 2.16 -761 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 7.83 -2,761 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.60 -2,328 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.49 -171 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 1.34 -471 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 2.16 -761 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 2.16 -761 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.58 204 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 4 0 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 3 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 3 3 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 3 6 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 8 5 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 0 . 0 1 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 0 . 0 0 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 67 29 9 . 9 9 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 67 29 9 . 9 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 55 27 2 . 1 1 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 67 29 9 . 9 8 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 67 30 0 . 0 0 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 67 30 0 . 2 2 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 0 . 8 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 0 . 8 6 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 4 3 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 67 29 9 . 9 8 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 67 30 0 . 1 9 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 8 . 0 6 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 8 , J - 2 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e st i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 w : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 6 . 4 2 f t / s V =0 .9 3 f t /s V =0 .9 3 f t /s V =1 .7 7 f t /s V =7 .1 1 f t /s V =7 .4 4 f t /s V= 0 . 0 8 f t / s V =7 .4 4 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =6 .4 2 f t /s V =1 .1 7 f t /s V =8 .4 4 f t /s V =6 .4 2 f t /s V =6 .4 2 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-2 ,2 6 2 g p m Q =3 2 8 g p m Q =3 2 8 g p m Q =6 2 3 g p m Q =-2 ,5 0 6 g p m Q =2 ,6 2 3 g p m Q =2 8 g p m Q =2 ,6 2 3 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,2 6 2 g p m Q =4 1 2 g p m Q =2 ,9 7 4 g p m Q =-2 ,2 6 2 g p m Q= - 2 , 2 6 2 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 5 3 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.44 2,974 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.02 712 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.17 412 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.17 412 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.33 117 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 7.44 2,623 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 7.44 2,623 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.77 623 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.77 623 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.77 623 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.93 328 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 6.42 -2,262 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 1 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 6.42 -2,262 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 6.42 -2,262 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 7.11 -2,506 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.93 328 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 0.08 28 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 0.74 -262 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 6.42 -2,262 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.33 -117 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 5 2 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 1 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 2 4 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 2 3 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 2 2 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 4 1 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 67 29 7 . 7 4 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 67 29 7 . 5 5 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 66 29 7 . 3 3 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 66 29 6 . 9 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 53 26 9 . 1 2 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 66 29 6 . 9 6 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 66 29 6 . 9 5 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 66 29 7 . 1 7 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 1 . 8 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 2 . 0 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 3 4 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 66 29 6 . 9 5 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 66 29 6 . 9 8 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 65 29 5 . 0 3 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 0 , J - 1 3 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e st i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 x : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 6 . 9 7 f t / s V =0 .3 8 f t /s V =5 .2 9 f t /s V =6 .8 9 f t /s V =6 .9 1 f t /s V =6 .8 9 f t /s V= 6 . 1 4 f t / s V =6 .8 9 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =6 .9 7 f t /s V =0 .8 2 f t /s V =8 .6 4 f t /s V =6 .9 7 f t /s V =6 .9 7 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-2 ,4 5 6 g p m Q =1 3 4 g p m Q =-1 ,8 6 6 g p m Q =2 ,4 2 9 g p m Q =-2 ,4 3 4 g p m Q =2 ,4 2 9 g p m Q =-2 ,1 6 6 g p m Q =2 ,4 2 9 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,4 5 6 g p m Q =2 9 0 g p m Q =3 ,0 4 6 g p m Q =-2 ,4 5 6 g p m Q= - 2 , 4 5 6 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 5 2 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.64 3,046 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 1.67 590 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.82 290 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.82 290 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.01 -5 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 6.89 2,429 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 6.89 2,429 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 6.89 2,429 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 6.89 2,429 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.22 429 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.38 134 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 6.97 -2,456 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 6.97 -2,456 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 6.97 -2,456 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.91 -2,434 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 5.29 -1,866 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 6.14 -2,166 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 6.97 -2,456 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 6.97 -2,456 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.01 5 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 4 7 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 2 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 2 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 5 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 67 29 8 . 6 7 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 66 29 6 . 3 1 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 65 29 3 . 5 7 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 64 29 3 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 52 26 5 . 5 3 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 64 29 3 . 3 9 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 64 29 3 . 9 2 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 65 29 5 . 9 1 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 1 . 4 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 1 . 6 3 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 3 9 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 64 29 3 . 6 9 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 65 29 5 . 6 9 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 64 29 1 . 7 7 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 0 , J - 1 7 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e st i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 y : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 3 . 0 3 f t / s V =1 .3 6 f t /s V =1 .3 6 f t /s V =5 .1 5 f t /s V =6 .2 5 f t /s V =5 .1 5 f t /s V= 2 . 2 1 f t / s V =5 .1 5 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =8 .7 0 f t /s V =0 .2 6 f t /s V =9 .3 0 f t /s V =3 .0 3 f t /s V =3 .0 3 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,0 6 8 g p m Q =-4 7 8 g p m Q =-4 7 8 g p m Q =1 ,8 1 7 g p m Q =-2 ,2 0 2 g p m Q =1 ,8 1 7 g p m Q =-7 7 8 g p m Q =1 ,8 1 7 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-3 ,0 6 8 g p m Q =-9 0 g p m Q =3 ,2 7 8 g p m Q =-1 ,0 6 8 g p m Q= - 1 , 0 6 8 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 5 4 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 9.30 3,278 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.60 210 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.26 -90 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.26 -90 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.09 -385 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 5.15 1,817 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 5.15 1,817 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 5.15 1,817 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 5.15 1,817 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.52 -183 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 1.36 -478 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 3.03 -1,068 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 3.03 -1,068 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 8.70 -3,068 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.25 -2,202 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 1.36 -478 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 2.21 -778 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 3 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 3.03 -1,068 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 3.03 -1,068 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.09 385 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 3 1 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 2 9 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 2 9 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 4 1 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 5 1 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 1 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 1 . 2 3 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 29 9 . 8 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 67 29 8 . 2 6 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 66 29 8 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 54 27 0 . 4 4 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 66 29 8 . 3 2 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 66 29 8 . 3 8 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 66 29 8 . 7 9 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 67 29 9 . 9 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 67 30 0 . 0 1 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 3 9 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 66 29 8 . 3 4 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 66 29 8 . 7 5 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 66 29 6 . 4 2 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 0 , J - 2 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e st i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 z : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 7 . 3 5 f t / s V =0 .0 0 f t /s V =0 .0 0 f t /s V =6 .5 1 f t /s V =6 .4 1 f t /s V =6 .5 1 f t /s V= 0 . 8 5 f t / s V =6 .5 1 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =7 .3 5 f t /s V =0 .9 4 f t /s V =8 .2 9 f t /s V =7 .3 5 f t /s V =7 .3 5 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-2 ,5 9 0 g p m Q =0 g p m Q =0 g p m Q =2 ,2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,2 5 8 g p m Q =2 ,2 9 5 g p m Q =-3 0 0 g p m Q =2 ,2 9 5 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,5 9 0 g p m Q =3 3 2 g p m Q =2 ,9 2 2 g p m Q =-2 ,5 9 0 g p m Q= - 2 , 5 9 0 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 5 3 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.29 2,922 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.94 332 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.94 332 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.94 332 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.10 37 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 6.51 2,295 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 6.51 2,295 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 6.51 2,295 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 6.51 2,295 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 4 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.84 295 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 0.00 0 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 7.35 -2,590 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 1 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 7.35 -2,590 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 4 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 7.35 -2,590 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.41 -2,258 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.00 0 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 0.85 -300 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 1.67 -590 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 7.35 -2,590 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 4 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.10 -37 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 5 6 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 5 1 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 5 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 4 6 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 4 6 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 4 6 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 8 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 67 29 9 . 4 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 66 29 7 . 2 8 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 65 29 4 . 8 1 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 65 29 4 . 7 2 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 53 26 6 . 8 6 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 65 29 4 . 7 2 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 65 29 4 . 7 3 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 65 29 5 . 1 0 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 68 30 1 . 1 6 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 68 30 1 . 4 2 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 5 6 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 65 29 4 . 7 2 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 65 29 4 . 8 5 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 64 29 2 . 8 0 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 3 , J - 1 7 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 2 a : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 3 . 5 5 f t / s V =3 .8 0 f t /s V =1 .8 8 f t /s V =4 .6 3 f t /s V =6 .0 0 f t /s V =4 .6 3 f t /s V= 2 . 7 3 f t / s V =4 .6 3 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =9 .2 2 f t /s V =0 .5 3 f t /s V =9 .5 4 f t /s V =3 .5 5 f t /s V =3 .5 5 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,2 5 2 g p m Q =1 ,3 3 8 g p m Q =-6 6 2 g p m Q =1 ,6 3 3 g p m Q =-2 ,1 1 6 g p m Q =1 ,6 3 3 g p m Q =-9 6 2 g p m Q =1 ,6 3 3 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-3 ,2 5 2 g p m Q =-1 8 8 g p m Q =3 ,3 6 4 g p m Q =-1 ,2 5 2 g p m Q= - 1 , 2 5 2 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 5 4 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 9.54 3,364 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 5 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.32 112 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.53 -188 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.53 -188 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.37 -483 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 4.63 1,633 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 4.63 1,633 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 4.63 1,633 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 4.63 1,633 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 4.63 1,633 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 3.80 1,338 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 3.55 -1,252 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 3.55 -1,252 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 9.22 -3,252 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.00 -2,116 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 1.88 -662 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 2.73 -962 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 3.55 -1,252 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 3.55 -1,252 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.37 483 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 2 5 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 2 4 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 2 4 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 2 5 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 4 3 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 5 9 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 2 5 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 1 . 9 0 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 0 . 7 7 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 67 29 9 . 4 6 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 66 29 7 . 3 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 54 26 9 . 4 8 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 66 29 7 . 1 7 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 66 29 7 . 2 6 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 66 29 7 . 8 2 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 67 29 9 . 3 9 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 67 29 9 . 4 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 3 6 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 66 29 7 . 2 1 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 66 29 7 . 7 6 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 65 29 5 . 2 9 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 3 , J - 2 0 , F i r e s p r i n k le r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J- 1 4 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 2 b : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .8 8 f t /s V= 7 . 9 7 f t / s V =5 .0 4 f t /s V =0 .6 4 f t /s V =5 .8 7 f t /s V =6 .5 4 f t /s V =5 .8 7 f t /s V= 1 . 4 7 f t / s V =5 .8 7 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =7 .9 7 f t /s V =0 .1 7 f t /s V =8 .9 9 f t /s V =7 .9 7 f t /s V =7 .9 7 f t /s Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,8 0 9 g p m Q =1 ,7 7 6 g p m Q =-2 2 4 g p m Q =2 ,0 7 1 g p m Q =-2 ,3 0 6 g p m Q =2 ,0 7 1 g p m Q =-5 1 9 g p m Q =2 ,0 7 1 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-2 ,8 0 9 g p m Q =6 0 g p m Q =3 ,1 6 9 g p m Q =-2 ,8 0 9 g p m Q= - 2 , 8 0 9 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 7 0 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 5 2 p s i P= 6 4 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 3 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.99 3,169 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 1.02 360 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.17 60 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.17 60 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 0.67 -235 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 5.87 2,071 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 5.87 2,071 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 5.87 2,071 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 3 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 5.87 2,071 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 5.87 2,071 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 1 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 5.04 1,776 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 7.97 -2,809 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 2 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 7.97 -2,809 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 4 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 7.97 -2,809 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 2 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 6.54 -2,306 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 4 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 0.64 -224 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 1.47 -519 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 2.30 -809 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 7.97 -2,809 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 4 8 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.88 295 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 0.67 235 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 70 30 4 . 3 9 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 3 3 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 3 3 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 3 3 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 3 7 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 4 1 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 3 . 9 0 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 68 30 0 . 2 4 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 67 29 8 . 4 8 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 66 29 6 . 4 5 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 64 29 3 . 1 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 52 26 5 . 2 8 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 64 29 2 . 8 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 64 29 2 . 8 7 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 64 29 3 . 3 8 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 67 30 0 . 4 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 67 30 0 . 7 4 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 4 3 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 64 29 2 . 8 6 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 64 29 3 . 1 0 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 63 29 1 . 0 0 29 5 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 1 7 , J - 2 0 , F i r e s p r i n k l e r J - 2 , J - 2 1 & D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 1 2 , J - 14 , J - 1 8 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 2 c : FH - 1 FH - 2 EX F H - 3 EX F H - 4 FH - 5 FH - 6 EX F H - 8 PH A S E - I I G E N E A U T R Y W A Y A R T I SA N C O U R T FH - 7 P- 2 2 P -2 1P-1 2 P -1 8 P -8 P -1 7 P-7 P -1 9 P- 6 P -1 6 P- 1 5 P-3 P -1 P -1 4 P -1 3 8 .0 i n 12 . 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 4. 0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n 1 2 .0 i n V =1 .9 1 f t /s V= 3 . 7 4 f t / s V =3 .6 1 f t /s V =3 .6 1 f t /s V =4 .4 5 f t /s V =5 .9 1 f t /s V =4 .4 5 f t /s V= 2 . 7 6 f t / s V =4 .4 5 f t /s V= 7 . 5 3 f t / s V =9 .4 1 f t /s V =0 .6 3 f t /s V =9 .6 3 f t /s V =3 .7 4 f t /s V =3 .7 4 f t /s Q =3 0 0 g p m Q =-1 ,3 1 8 g p m Q =1 ,2 7 2 g p m Q =1 ,2 7 2 g p m Q =1 ,5 6 7 g p m Q =-2 ,0 8 4 g p m Q =1 ,5 6 7 g p m Q =9 7 2 g p m Q =1 ,5 6 7 g p m Q =2 9 5 g p m Q =-3 ,3 1 8 g p m Q =-2 2 1 g p m Q =3 ,3 9 6 g p m Q =-1 ,3 1 8 g p m Q= - 1 , 3 1 8 g p m J- 2 0 J- 5 J- 1 9 J- 4 J- 3 J- 2 J-1 J- 1 8 J- 1 7 J-1 6 J- 1 5 J- 1 4 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 J- 9 J- 8 J-7 J- 2 1 J- 6 P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 5 9 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 5 4 p s i P= 6 6 p s i P= 6 7 p s i P= 6 8 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 9 p s i P= 6 5 p s i P= 6 9 p s i De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 2 , 0 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 2 9 5 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m De m a n d = 3 0 0 g p m De m a n d = 0 g p m R- 2 R- 1 HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t HG L = 3 0 5 . 5 9 f t 1/11/2016 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSI S II-REVISED.wtg Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Ha z e n - W i l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Di a m e t e r (in ) Le n g t h (S c a l e d ) (f t ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 9.63 3,396 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 6 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 38 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.22 79 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 12 9 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.63 -221 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 9 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.63 -221 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 99 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.46 -516 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 22 1 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 4.45 1,567 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 9 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 36 J- 7 J- 6 P- 6 4.45 1,567 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 30 1 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 4.45 1,567 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 14 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 4.45 1,567 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 17 2 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 4.45 1,567 0. 3 7 0 0. 0 0 7 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 27 4 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 2 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 12 9 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 3.61 1,272 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 26 J- 1 3 J- 1 1 P- 1 2 3.74 -1,318 0. 3 4 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 33 7 J- 1 6 J- 1 5 P- 1 3 3.74 -1,318 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 1 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 7 J- 1 6 P- 1 4 9.41 -3,318 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 3 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 16 7 J- 1 J- 1 7 P- 1 5 7.53 295 22 . 1 8 0 0. 3 0 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 4. 0 83 J- 1 8 J- 4 P- 1 6 5.91 -2,084 0. 0 0 0 0. 0 1 2 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 81 R- 2 J- 6 P- 1 7 3.61 1,272 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 25 J- 1 9 J- 1 3 P- 1 8 2.76 972 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 5 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 J- 1 4 J- 1 9 P- 1 9 1.94 682 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 2 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 10 5 J- 2 0 J- 1 4 P- 2 0 3.74 -1,318 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 1 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 6 J- 1 5 J- 2 0 P- 2 1 1.91 300 28 . 8 8 0 0. 0 1 6 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 8. 0 12 1 J- 2 1 J- 1 9 P- 2 2 1.46 516 0. 1 7 0 0. 0 0 1 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 . 0 20 0 J- 5 J- 6 P- 2 3 1/1 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FIRE & DOMESTIC WATER SERVICE ANALYSIS II-REVIS Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 69 30 4 . 2 2 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 1 22 4 69 30 4 . 2 2 30 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 2 22 6 69 30 4 . 2 2 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 3 22 8 69 30 4 . 2 4 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 4 23 0 69 30 4 . 4 4 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 5 23 2 69 30 4 . 6 1 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 6 23 6 69 30 4 . 3 1 0 14 4 . 2 0 J- 7 23 8 69 30 2 . 1 2 0 14 3 . 5 0 J- 8 24 0 68 30 1 . 0 8 0 14 3 . 6 0 J- 9 24 2 67 29 9 . 8 7 0 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 0 24 4 66 29 7 . 9 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 1 24 6 54 27 0 . 0 4 29 5 14 5 . 5 0 J- 1 2 24 8 66 29 7 . 7 4 0 14 4 . 7 0 J- 1 3 25 2 66 29 7 . 5 5 29 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 1 4 25 4 66 29 7 . 4 5 0 14 5 . 4 0 J- 1 5 25 6 67 29 9 . 1 8 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 6 25 8 67 29 9 . 2 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 8 0 J- 1 7 26 0 59 27 9 . 3 4 29 5 14 4 . 1 0 J- 1 8 26 3 66 29 7 . 6 0 0 14 4 . 9 1 J- 1 9 34 9 66 29 7 . 3 9 2, 0 0 0 14 5 . 3 8 J- 2 0 35 2 65 29 5 . 6 8 30 0 14 5 . 0 0 J- 2 1 35 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 JPIAS-FI Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r     Hydraulic Network Analysis Fire & Domestic Water Service Phase III AMB Platinum, LLC JPI Jefferson Stadium Park TTM P.M. 2015‐174 1969 S. State College Blvd. Anaheim, California 92805 January 11, 2016 Prepared By:      ATTESTATION This report has been prepared by, and under the direction of, the undersigned, a duly Registered Civil Engineer in the State of California. Except as noted, the undersigned attests to the technical information contained herein, and has judged to be acceptable the qualifications of any technical specialists providing engineering data for this report, upon which findings, conclusions, and recommendations are based. ________________________________ ______________________ James H. Kawamura, P.E. Date: January 11, 2016 Registered Civil Engineer No. C30560 Exp. 3/31/16       i CONTENTS Attestation Design Criteria Design Assumptions HGL at Fixed Grade Node Calculations Average Water Demand Calculations Hydrants and Flow Test Fire hydrant @ junction J-2, J-3, fire sprinkler J-15, & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IA: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-3, J-8, J-13 & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-2, J-5, fire sprinkler J-15, & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IB: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-5, J-8, J-13 & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-2, J-7, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IC: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-7, J-8, J-13 & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-2, J-9, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario ID: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-8, J-9, J-13 & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-2, J-14, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IE: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-2, J-8, J-13, J-14 & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-5, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IF: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-3, J-5, J-8, J-13, & J-15. ii Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-7, fire sprinkler J-15, & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IG: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-3, J-7, J-8, J-13, & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-9, fire sprinkler J-15, & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IH: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-3, J-8, J-9, J-13, & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-3, J-14, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IJ: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-3, J-8, J-13, J-14 & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-7, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IK: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-5, J-7, J-8, J-13, & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-9, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IL: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-5, J-8, J-9, J-13, & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-5, J-14, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IM: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-5, J-8, J-13, J-14, & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-7, J-9, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IN: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-8, J-9, J-13, & J-15. Fire hydrant @ junction J-7, J-14, fire sprinkler J-7, J-18 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IO: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-7, J-8, J-9, J-14, J-15, & J-18. Fire hydrant @ junction J-9, J-14, fire sprinkler J-15 & Domestic Water @ J-8, & J-13 flowing simultaneously Scenario IP: Adjustment for minor head losses. 4,870 gpm total fire flows at junction J-8, J-9, J-13, J-14, & J-15. iii Hydraulic Network Software The software used to calculate the hydraulic network for the Project is Bentley WaterCAD V8i (Select 4), a water distribution modeling and management program by Haestad Methods, Solution Center., 27 Siemon Company Drive, Suite 200W Watertown, CT 06795 USA. Design Criteria: Maximum pressure at Nodes = 86.00 psi Static Pressure at State College Blvd. Maximum Pressure at Nodes = 80.00 Residual Pressure at Fire Hydrant Minimum pressure at Fire hydrant = 20 psi Fire flow demand: (2) 2,000 gpm fire hydrant at 20 psi. (Minimum allowable per 50% reduction for sprinkler system per UFC Appendix III for Type V - n hr. construction), Maximum fire area for Building type per Site plan. Sprinkler System Demand: maximum of 300 gpm (per Building Types) Pipeline friction factor (adjusted to include minor pipeline losses): Pipe Material PVC 150 Coefficient Pipe Material DIP 120 Coefficient Domestic Water Demand: Total number of Fixture Units per Building Design Assumptions: Available pressure near site: Southwest corner State College Boulevard and Gene Autry Way Flowed FH # 5298 and Residual City FH # 5297 Result of 86.00 Static Pressure, 80.00 psi Residual Pressure Head losses: 4” Water Meter: 9.6 8” Reduced pressure assembly: 12.50 psi Node Elevations: Water lateral connections at 1’ below top of meter. Fire hydrant connections at 2.5’ above finished surface. iv HGL at Fixed Grade Nodes (FGN) Pressure Test: Flow test Hydrant location: Front of the Proposed Project in Gene Autry Way Available Pressure Residual = 80.00 psi at Elevation 149.80’ Date of flow test: September 9, 2015 Available head: I Available head @ pressure 80.00 psi: (Gene Autry Way) Elevation of measured hydrant 149.80 ft. Measure Pressure (psi) x 2.308 80 x 2.308 184.64 ft. Available Hydraulic Grade Line available 334.44 ft. Node R1 Available Hydraulic Grade line 334.44 ft. Elevation Node 150.80 ft. Difference 183.64 ft. Head Losses 15.50 psi = 12.5 x 2.308 -28.85 ft. Equal HGL at Fixed Grade Node 305.59 ft. Node R2 Available Hydraulic Grade line 334.44 ft. Elevation Node 149.60 ft. Difference 184.84 ft. Head Losses 12.50 psi = 12.5 x 2.308 -28.85 ft. Equal HGL at Fixed Grade Node 305.59 ft. Average Water Demand: Average Daily Demand ADD Building Fixture Units per UPC Maximum Day Demand (MDD) = 2.0xADD Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0xADD Fire Sprinkler Demand per Building 300 gpm Fire hydrant Demand= 1500 gpm (minimum)2000 gpm Average Water Demand  Total Demand Phase I Building A: per UPC ADD toilets 499 sinks 1172 1671 290 gpm Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0 x ADD 1160 gpm Maximum Day Demand (MDD) 2.0 x ADD 580 gpm (MDD) + Fire Flow Spinkler + Fire Hydrant 4880 gpm Phase II Building B: ADD toilets 511 sinks 1219 1730 295 gpm Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0 x ADD 1180 gpm Maximum Day Demand (MDD) 2.0 x ADD 590 gpm (MDD) + Fire Flow Spinkler + Fire Hydrant 4890 gpm Phase III Building B: ADD toilets 456 sinks 1076 1532 275 gpm Peak Hour Demand (PHD) 4.0 x ADD 1100 gpm Maximum Day Demand (MDD) 2.0 x ADD 550 gpm (MDD) + Fire Flow Spinkler + Fire Hydrant 4850 gpm Maximum Pressure Peak Hour Demand Flow 45 psi Maximum Day Demand Plus Fire flow 20 psi Maximum Velocity Peak Hour Demand Flow 5.0 ft/sec Maximum Day Demand Plus Fire flow 10.0 ft/sec Fixture Units Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 2 , J - 3 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 13 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 a : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 1 . 1 5 f t / s V = 6 . 4 1 f t / s V = 0 . 5 3 f t / s V = 1 . 1 5 f t / s V = 5 . 2 6 f t / s V = 0 . 4 2 f t / s V = 6 . 0 9 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (g p m ) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.40 2,610 0. 0 1 8 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 6.09 2,147 0. 0 1 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.42 147 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 5.26 -1,853 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 1.15 407 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 1.15 407 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 1.15 407 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.32 112 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.32 112 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.53 -188 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 0.53 -188 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 1.31 -463 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 1.31 -463 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 6.41 2,260 0. 0 1 7 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 1.15 407 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 7 1 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 69 30 2 . 7 9 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 67 30 2 . 7 6 2, 0 0 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 9 0 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 4 . 8 1 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 68 30 4 . 6 5 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 70 30 4 . 5 4 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 69 30 4 . 4 1 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 69 30 4 . 4 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 69 30 4 . 4 0 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 68 30 4 . 4 2 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 70 30 4 . 4 3 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 59 28 1 . 4 5 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 68 30 4 . 5 0 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 68 30 2 . 6 0 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 2 , J - 5 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 b : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 0 . 4 0 f t / s V = 7 . 0 9 f t / s V = 2 . 0 9 f t / s V = 0 . 4 0 f t / s V = 1 . 8 3 f t / s V = 1 . 8 3 f t / s V = 3 . 8 5 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 6.72 2,369 0. 0 1 5 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.85 1,357 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.83 -643 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.83 -643 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 5.27 1,858 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.40 -142 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.40 -142 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.24 -437 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.24 -437 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 2.09 -737 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 2.09 -737 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 2.87 -1,012 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 2.87 -1,012 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 7.09 2,501 0. 0 2 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 0.40 -142 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) Ele v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 4 . 8 6 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 0 4 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 4 6 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 7 5 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 3 . 1 8 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 67 30 3 . 2 0 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 69 30 3 . 2 2 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 69 30 3 . 2 4 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 69 30 3 . 3 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 69 30 3 . 3 1 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 68 30 3 . 5 4 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 69 30 3 . 6 4 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 59 28 0 . 6 6 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 68 30 3 . 9 5 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 68 30 1 . 5 1 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 2 , J - 7 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 13 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 c : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 4 . 0 9 f t / s V = 6 . 2 3 f t / s V = 3 . 2 7 f t / s V = 1 . 5 8 f t / s V = 2 . 1 4 f t / s V = 2 . 1 4 f t / s V = 3 . 5 3 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.59 2,674 0. 0 1 9 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.53 1,246 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.14 -754 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.14 -754 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 4.09 1,442 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 4.09 1,442 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 1.58 -558 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.42 -853 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.42 -853 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.27 -1,153 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 3.27 -1,153 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 4.05 -1,428 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 4.05 -1,428 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 6.23 2,196 0. 0 1 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 4.09 1,442 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 6 7 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 3 . 9 7 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 5 3 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 9 4 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 3 . 9 5 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 67 30 2 . 3 3 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 68 30 1 . 1 2 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 68 30 1 . 3 5 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 68 30 1 . 5 8 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 68 30 1 . 6 1 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 67 30 2 . 1 3 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 69 30 2 . 3 6 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 59 27 9 . 3 8 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 68 30 2 . 9 6 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 67 29 9 . 8 2 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 2 , J - 9 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 d : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 3 . 5 9 f t / s V = 5 . 8 5 f t / s V = 3 . 7 7 f t / s V = 3 . 5 9 f t / s V = 2 . 2 7 f t / s V = 2 . 2 7 f t / s V = 3 . 4 1 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.96 2,806 0. 0 2 1 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.41 1,201 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.27 -799 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.27 -799 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 3.59 1,265 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.59 1,265 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 3.59 1,265 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.75 970 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.92 -1,030 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.77 -1,330 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 3.77 -1,330 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 4.55 -1,606 0. 0 0 8 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 4.55 -1,606 0. 0 0 8 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 5.85 2,064 0. 0 1 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 3.59 1,265 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 5 9 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 69 30 3 . 9 3 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 5 6 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 5 . 0 1 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 4 . 2 4 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 67 30 2 . 9 6 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 68 30 2 . 0 2 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 68 30 0 . 9 8 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 68 30 0 . 6 9 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 68 30 0 . 7 4 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 67 30 1 . 4 2 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 69 30 1 . 7 2 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 58 27 8 . 7 4 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 67 30 2 . 4 6 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 67 29 8 . 9 4 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 2 , J - 1 4 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 13 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 e : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 3 . 0 0 f t / s V = 5 . 4 2 f t / s V = 1 . 3 2 f t / s V = 3 . 0 0 f t / s V = 2 . 4 1 f t / s V = 2 . 4 1 f t / s V = 3 . 2 6 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 8.40 2,960 0. 0 2 3 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 3.26 1,149 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.41 -851 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 2.41 -851 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 3.00 1,059 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.00 1,059 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 3.00 1,059 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.17 764 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.17 764 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.32 464 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 1.32 464 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 0.54 189 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 5.14 -1,811 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 5.42 1,910 0. 0 1 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 3.00 1,059 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 4 8 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 69 30 3 . 8 8 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 5 8 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 5 . 0 9 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 4 . 5 3 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 67 30 3 . 6 2 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 69 30 2 . 9 4 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 68 30 2 . 1 9 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 68 30 2 . 0 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 68 30 1 . 9 7 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 67 30 1 . 8 8 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 69 30 1 . 8 4 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 58 27 8 . 8 6 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 67 30 1 . 8 2 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 67 30 0 . 1 7 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 5 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 f : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 0 . 6 0 f t / s V = 8 . 0 7 f t / s V = 2 . 2 9 f t / s V = 0 . 6 0 f t / s V = 3 . 0 0 f t / s V = 2 . 6 8 f t / s V = 2 . 6 8 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 5.75 2,026 0. 0 1 1 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.68 944 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.68 944 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 3.00 -1,056 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 5.07 1,788 0. 0 0 9 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 0.60 -212 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.60 -212 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.44 -507 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.44 -507 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 2.29 -807 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 2.29 -807 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 3.07 -1,082 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 3.07 -1,082 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 8.07 2,844 0. 0 2 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 0.60 -212 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Ben t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 5 . 0 4 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 6 2 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 3 . 7 7 2, 0 0 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 5 3 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 3 . 0 6 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 67 30 3 . 1 0 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 69 30 3 . 1 4 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 69 30 3 . 1 8 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 69 30 3 . 2 6 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 69 30 3 . 2 8 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 68 30 3 . 5 5 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 69 30 3 . 6 6 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 59 28 0 . 6 8 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 68 30 4 . 0 2 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 68 30 1 . 4 8 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 7 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 g : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 3 . 9 8 f t / s V = 7 . 2 4 f t / s V = 3 . 3 9 f t / s V = 1 . 7 0 f t / s V = 3 . 2 6 f t / s V = 2 . 4 1 f t / s V = 2 . 4 1 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 6.58 2,319 0. 0 1 5 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.41 850 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.41 850 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 3.26 -1,150 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 3.98 1,401 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.98 1,401 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 1.70 -599 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.54 -894 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.54 -894 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 3.39 -1,194 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 3.39 -1,194 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 4.17 -1,469 0. 0 0 7 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 4.17 -1,469 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 7.24 2,551 0. 0 2 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 3.98 1,401 0. 0 0 6 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 4 . 8 9 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 5 4 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 3 . 8 4 2, 0 0 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 7 2 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 3 . 7 9 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 67 30 2 . 2 5 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 68 30 1 . 1 0 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 68 30 1 . 3 6 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 68 30 1 . 6 1 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 68 30 1 . 6 5 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 67 30 2 . 2 1 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 69 30 2 . 4 5 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 59 27 9 . 4 7 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 68 30 3 . 0 8 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 67 29 9 . 8 6 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 9 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 h : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 6 . 8 1 f t / s V = 1 0 . 3 4 f t / s V = 8 . 2 1 f t / s V = 6 . 8 1 f t / s V = 3 . 5 2 f t / s V = 2 . 1 5 f t / s V = 2 . 1 5 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 11.14 3,927 0. 0 3 9 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.15 758 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.15 758 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 3.52 -1,242 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 6.81 2,401 0. 0 1 6 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 6.81 2,401 0. 0 1 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 6.81 2,401 0. 0 1 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 5.97 2,106 0. 0 1 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.30 106 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 8.21 -2,894 0. 0 2 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 8.21 -2,894 0. 0 2 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 8.99 -3,169 0. 0 2 8 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 8.99 -3,169 0. 0 2 7 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 10.34 3,643 0. 0 4 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 19.15 -3,000 2. 5 9 3 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 6.81 2,401 0. 0 1 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 3 . 7 2 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 69 30 3 . 4 5 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 67 30 2 . 8 8 2, 0 0 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 69 30 3 . 9 0 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 67 30 1 . 3 6 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 65 29 7 . 1 7 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 65 29 4 . 0 6 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 63 29 0 . 6 5 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 63 28 9 . 4 0 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 63 28 9 . 4 0 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 63 29 2 . 2 9 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 65 29 3 . 5 7 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 55 27 0 . 5 9 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 65 29 6 . 2 0 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 -1 3 11 4 . 0 4 3, 0 0 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 3 , J - 1 4 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 j : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 2 . 8 7 f t / s V = 6 . 4 1 f t / s V = 1 . 1 8 f t / s V = 2 . 8 7 f t / s V = 3 . 5 3 f t / s V = 2 . 1 4 f t / s V = 2 . 1 4 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.41 2,612 0. 0 1 8 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 2.14 754 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 2.14 754 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 3.53 -1,246 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 2.87 1,012 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 2.87 1,012 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 2.87 1,012 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 2.03 717 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 2.03 717 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.18 417 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 1.18 417 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 0.40 142 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 5.27 -1,858 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 6.41 2,258 0. 0 1 7 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 2.87 1,012 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 7 1 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 4 4 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 3 . 8 8 2, 0 0 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 9 0 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 4 . 3 9 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 67 30 3 . 5 5 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 69 30 2 . 9 2 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 68 30 2 . 2 4 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 68 30 2 . 0 7 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 68 30 2 . 0 4 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 67 30 1 . 9 6 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 69 30 1 . 9 3 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 58 27 8 . 9 5 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 67 30 1 . 9 2 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 67 30 0 . 2 5 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 7 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 13 F l o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 k : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 3 . 0 2 f t / s V = 7 . 6 4 f t / s V = 4 . 3 4 f t / s V = 2 . 6 5 f t / s V = 1 . 0 6 f t / s V = 1 . 0 6 f t / s V = 1 . 0 6 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 6.17 2,176 0. 0 1 3 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 1.06 372 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.06 372 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.06 372 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 8.70 3,066 0. 0 2 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 3.02 1,066 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 2.65 -934 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 3.49 -1,229 0. 0 0 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.49 -1,229 0. 0 0 8 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 4.34 -1,529 0. 0 0 7 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 4.34 -1,529 0. 0 0 8 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 5.12 -1,804 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 5.12 -1,804 0. 0 0 9 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 7.64 2,694 0. 0 2 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 3.02 1,066 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 4 . 9 6 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 8 9 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 7 4 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 6 3 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 67 30 0 . 6 3 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 66 29 9 . 7 0 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 67 29 9 . 0 1 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 67 29 9 . 6 0 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 67 30 0 . 0 6 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 67 30 0 . 1 3 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 67 30 1 . 0 1 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 68 30 1 . 4 0 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 58 27 8 . 4 2 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 67 30 2 . 3 2 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 67 29 8 . 3 3 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 9 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 l : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 2 . 5 9 f t / s V = 7 . 4 0 f t / s V = 4 . 7 8 f t / s V = 2 . 5 9 f t / s V = 0 . 8 6 f t / s V = 0 . 8 6 f t / s V = 0 . 8 6 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 6.42 2,263 0. 0 1 4 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.86 304 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.86 304 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.86 304 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 8.26 2,911 0. 0 2 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 2.59 911 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 2.59 911 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 1.75 616 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 3.93 -1,384 0. 0 1 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 4.78 -1,684 0. 0 0 8 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 4.78 -1,684 0. 0 0 9 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 5.56 -1,959 0. 0 1 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 5.56 -1,959 0. 0 1 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 7.40 2,607 0. 0 2 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 2.59 911 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 4 . 9 2 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 8 7 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 7 6 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 6 9 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 67 30 1 . 0 5 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 66 30 0 . 3 6 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 68 29 9 . 8 4 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 67 29 9 . 2 8 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 67 29 9 . 1 5 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 67 29 9 . 2 5 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 66 30 0 . 3 0 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 68 30 0 . 7 6 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 58 27 7 . 7 9 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 67 30 1 . 8 4 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 66 29 7 . 4 5 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 5 , J - 1 4 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 m : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 1 . 7 7 f t / s V = 7 . 0 1 f t / s V = 0 . 0 8 f t / s V = 1 . 7 7 f t / s V = 0 . 4 4 f t / s V = 0 . 4 4 f t / s V = 0 . 4 4 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 6.81 2,400 0. 0 1 6 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.44 155 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.44 155 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.44 155 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 7.45 2,625 0. 0 1 8 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 1.77 625 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 1.77 625 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.94 330 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.94 330 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 0.08 30 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 0.08 30 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 0.70 -245 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 6.37 -2,245 0. 0 1 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 7.01 2,470 0. 0 2 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 1.77 625 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 68 30 4 . 8 4 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 8 3 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 8 0 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 7 7 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 67 30 1 . 7 8 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 66 30 1 . 4 3 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 68 30 1 . 1 8 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 68 30 0 . 9 0 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 68 30 0 . 8 6 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 68 30 0 . 8 5 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 67 30 0 . 8 5 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 68 30 0 . 8 5 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 58 27 7 . 8 7 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 67 30 0 . 8 7 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 67 29 9 . 0 5 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 7 , J - 9 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 n : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 6 . 6 4 f t / s V = 6 . 8 2 f t / s V = 6 . 3 9 f t / s V = 0 . 9 7 f t / s V = 0 . 1 8 f t / s V = 0 . 1 8 f t / s V = 0 . 1 8 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 6.99 2,465 0. 0 1 6 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.18 -64 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.18 -64 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.18 -64 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 6.64 2,341 0. 0 1 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 6.64 2,341 0. 0 1 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.97 341 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.13 46 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 5.54 -1,954 0. 0 1 9 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 6.39 -2,254 0. 0 1 4 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 6.39 -2,254 0. 0 1 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 7.17 -2,529 0. 0 1 9 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 7.17 -2,529 0. 0 1 8 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 6.82 2,405 0. 0 1 9 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 6.64 2,341 0. 0 1 5 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 8 0 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 8 0 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 8 1 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 8 1 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 67 30 2 . 3 9 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 65 29 8 . 3 9 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 66 29 5 . 4 2 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 65 29 5 . 3 3 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 65 29 5 . 3 3 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 65 29 5 . 5 1 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 65 29 7 . 3 2 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 67 29 8 . 1 3 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 57 27 5 . 1 5 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 66 29 9 . 8 5 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 65 29 3 . 7 1 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 7 , J - 1 4 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 o : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 5 . 6 6 f t / s V = 6 . 4 2 f t / s V = 1 . 7 1 f t / s V = 0 . 0 2 f t / s V = 0 . 7 6 f t / s V = 0 . 7 6 f t / s V = 0 . 7 6 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.40 2,608 0. 0 1 8 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 0.76 -269 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 0.76 -269 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 0.76 -269 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 5.66 1,993 0. 0 1 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 5.66 1,993 0. 0 1 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 0.02 -7 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 0.86 -302 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 0.86 -302 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 1.71 -602 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 1.71 -602 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 2.49 -877 0. 0 0 3 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 8.16 -2,877 0. 0 2 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 6.42 2,262 0. 0 1 7 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 5.66 1,993 0. 0 1 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 7 2 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 7 6 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 8 4 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 9 0 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 3 . 1 0 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 66 30 0 . 1 4 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 67 29 7 . 9 3 2, 0 0 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 66 29 7 . 9 3 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 66 29 7 . 9 6 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 66 29 7 . 9 7 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 66 29 8 . 1 2 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 67 29 8 . 1 9 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 57 27 5 . 2 1 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 66 29 8 . 4 3 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 66 29 6 . 1 7 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Sc e n a r i o : F H J - 9 , J - 1 4 & F i r e s p r i nk l e r J - 1 5 , D o m e s t i c W a t e r J - 8 , J - 1 3 Fl o w S i m u l t a n e o u s l y S c e n a r i o 1 p : S T A T E C O L L E G E B O U L E V A R D P H A S E I I P - 1 7 P - 1 5 P - 1 0 P - 7 P - 4 P - 3 P - 2 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n 1 2 . 0 i n V = 5 . 0 5 f t / s V = 6 . 0 9 f t / s V = 2 . 3 1 f t / s V = 5 . 0 5 f t / s V = 1 . 0 3 f t / s V = 1 . 0 3 f t / s V = 1 . 0 3 f t / s 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : P i p e T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Velocity (ft/s)Flow (gpm) He a d l o s s Gr a d i e n t (f t / f t ) Mi n o r L o s s Co e f f i c i e n t (L o c a l ) Ha z e n - Wi l l i a m s C Ma t e r i a l Le n g t h (f t ) Di a m e t e r (i n ) St o p N o d e St a r t N o d e La b e l 7.73 2,724 0. 0 2 0 0. 0 0 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 48 12 . 0 J- 1 R- 1 P- 1 1.03 -365 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 14 4 12 . 0 J- 2 J- 1 P- 2 1.03 -365 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 30 0 12 . 0 J- 3 J- 2 P- 3 1.03 -365 0. 0 0 0 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 21 4 12 . 0 J- 4 J- 3 P- 4 5.05 1,781 0. 0 0 9 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 16 2 12 . 0 J- 5 J- 4 P- 5 5.05 1,781 0. 0 0 9 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 26 1 12 . 0 J- 6 J- 5 P- 6 5.05 1,781 0. 0 0 9 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 22 0 12 . 0 J- 8 J- 7 P- 7 4.22 1,486 0. 0 0 7 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 99 12 . 0 J- 9 J- 8 P- 8 1.46 -514 0. 0 0 1 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 9 12 . 0 J- 1 0 J- 9 P- 9 2.31 -814 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 12 9 12 . 0 J- 1 1 J- 1 0 P- 1 0 2.31 -814 0. 0 0 2 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 50 12 . 0 J- 1 2 J- 1 1 P- 1 1 7.02 275 0. 2 1 7 22 . 1 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 10 6 4. 0 J- 1 3 J- 1 2 P- 1 2 3.09 -1,089 0. 0 0 4 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 93 12 . 0 J- 1 4 J- 1 2 P- 1 3 8.76 -3,089 0. 0 2 6 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 28 0 12 . 0 J- 1 J- 1 4 P- 1 4 6.09 2,146 0. 0 1 5 0. 1 7 0 11 7 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 42 12 . 0 J- 4 R- 2 P- 1 5 1.91 -300 0. 0 2 7 28 . 8 8 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 68 8. 0 J- 1 0 J- 1 5 P- 1 6 5.05 1,781 0. 0 0 9 0. 1 7 0 12 0 . 0 Du c t i l e I r o n 20 1 12 . 0 J- 7 J- 6 P- 1 7 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r Fl e x T a b l e : J u n c t i o n T a b l e Cu r r e n t T i m e : 0 . 0 0 0 h o u r s Pr e s s u r e (p s i ) Hy d r a u l i c G r a d e (f t ) De m a n d (g p m ) El e v a t i o n (f t ) La b e l ID 67 30 4 . 6 4 0 14 8 . 8 0 J- 1 31 70 30 4 . 7 1 0 14 3 . 3 0 J- 2 32 68 30 4 . 8 6 0 14 7 . 3 0 J- 3 33 70 30 4 . 9 6 0 14 3 . 8 0 J- 4 34 68 30 3 . 5 1 0 14 6 . 8 0 J- 5 35 66 30 1 . 1 0 0 14 7 . 8 0 J- 6 36 67 29 9 . 3 1 0 14 3 . 7 0 J- 7 38 66 29 7 . 3 6 29 5 14 4 . 6 0 J- 8 39 66 29 6 . 7 1 2, 0 0 0 14 4 . 5 0 J- 9 40 66 29 6 . 7 2 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 0 41 65 29 6 . 9 9 0 14 6 . 6 0 J- 1 1 42 67 29 7 . 1 1 0 14 3 . 2 0 J- 1 2 43 56 27 4 . 1 3 27 5 14 4 . 0 0 J- 1 3 44 65 29 7 . 4 7 2, 0 0 0 14 6 . 7 0 J- 1 4 45 65 29 4 . 9 2 30 0 14 4 . 3 0 J- 1 5 10 5 27 S i e m o n C o m p a n y D r i v e S u i t e 2 0 0 W W a t e r t o w n , C T 0 6 7 9 5 U S A + 1 - 2 0 3 - 7 5 5 - 1 6 6 6 Be n t l e y S y s t e m s , I n c . H a e s t a d M e t h o d s S o l u t i o n C e n t e r MEMORANDUM To: Scott Koehm, Senior Planner From: Collin Ramsey, Project Manager Subject: Errata to Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Jefferson Stadium Park Project Date: May 9, 2016 cc: Susan Kim, Principal Planner; Christine Saunders, Associate Planner Attachment(s): None The purpose of this errata memorandum is to clarify which project approvals are required – and conversely, which approvals are not required – for the proposed Jefferson Stadium Park project, as provided in the May 2016 Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (Addendum). The Addendum lists a total of six discrete actions that are required for the proposed project, including approval of a Master Site Plan. However, after further review of the City of Anaheim Zoning Code, approval of a Master Site Plan has been determined to not be required. As such, this errata memorandum shall serve to correct any erroneous reference within the Addendum to the Master Site Plan as a required project approval. None of the following non-substantive revisions entail a significant, meaningful change to the environmental impact analysis or environmental significance determinations provided throughout the Addendum, and do not change the adequacy of the Addendum and its findings. Instead, the following revisions are merely provided to clarify for both City decision makers and the public which approvals are required for the proposed project. Therefore, the following non-substantive revisions are made to the May 2016 Addendum. Page numbers corresponding to the location within the Addendum where the text has been revised are provided below. The addition of text is shown in underline; conversely, the removal of text is shown in strikethrough. PAGE 1 The City of Anaheim (City) received an application from Jefferson at Stadium Park, L.P. (project applicant) requesting approval of the following actions to allow for development of the Jefferson Stadium Park project (proposed project): ATTACHMENT NO. 8a Memorandum Subject: Errata to Addendum to Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Jefferson Stadium Park Project 9289.1 2 May 2016 • General Plan Amendments (GPA2015-000506) • Amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan Amendments (MIS2015-00621) • Master Site Plan (MIS2015-00622) • Three Final Site Plans (FSP2015-00003, FSP2015-00004, FSP2015-00005) • Development Agreement (DAG2015-00002) • Tentative Parcel Map (SUBPM2015-174) PAGE 6 As discussed in Section 2, the proposed project analyzed herein involves approval of a Master Site Plan and other related discretionary and ministerial approvals to allow for development of a mixed-use community with 1,079 residential apartments, including 12 live/work units; 9,800 square feet of retail space; a 1.11-acre public park; on-site parking, roadways, and pedestrian pathways; and associated on-site and frontage infrastructure improvements. As addressed in Section 3.10, the proposed project is consistent with the development intensity contemplated in SEIR No. 339, and would generate similar environmental impacts as evaluated in the SEIR. Therefore, the project would not result in any of the conditions described in CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 calling for preparation of a Subsequent EIR. PAGE 42 The following discretionary actions would be required to implement the proposed project. This list is preliminary, and may not be comprehensive: • General Plan Amendment (GPA2015-00506): To relocate and combine two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park location as mixed-use • Amendment to the PTMLUP (MIS2015-00621): To reflect the proposed park layout as requested in the General Plan Amendment and reflect new internal street alignments • Master Site Plan (MIS2015-00622) • Three Final Site Plans (FSP2015-00003, FSP2015-00004, FSP2015-00005) • Development Agreement (DAG2015-00002) • Tentative Parcel Map (SUBPM2015-174) Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program for the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 Jefferson Stadium Park Project Prepared for: City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Contact: Scott Koehm, Senior Planner Prepared by: DUDEK 31878 Camino Capistrano, Suite 200 San Juan Capistrano, California 92675 Contact: Collin Ramsey, Project Manager MAY 2016 ATTACHMENT NO. 9 Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 i May 2016 TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page No. 1 INTRODUCTION..............................................................................................................1 2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CHECKLIST .....3 TABLE 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist .................................................. 3 Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 ii May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 1 May 2016 1 INTRODUCTION The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires that a public agency adopting an environmental impact report (EIR) (or in this case, an addendum to a previously certified EIR) take affirmative steps to determine that approved mitigation measures are implemented subsequent to project approval. The lead or responsible agency must adopt a reporting and monitoring program for the mitigation measures incorporated into a project or included as conditions of approval. The program must be designed to ensure compliance with the EIR during project implementation (California Public Resources Code, Section 21081.6(a)(1)). This Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program (MMRP) will be used by the City of Anaheim (City) as lead agency to ensure compliance with adopted mitigation measures identified in the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Jefferson Stadium Park project (proposed project) when construction of the project and associated improvements commences. The City, as lead agency pursuant to CEQA, will ensure that all mitigation measures are adequately carried out. The remainder of this MMRP consists of a table that identifies the mitigation measures by resource for each project component. Table 1 identifies the mitigation monitoring and reporting requirements, including the entity(s) responsible for verifying implementation of the mitigation measure, timing of verification (prior to, during, or after construction), and responsible party. Space is provided for sign-off following completion/implementation of the mitigation measure. The source documents are the Addendum to the Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339 for the Jefferson Stadium Park project and its appendices. Along with the Addendum and related documents, this MMRP will be kept on file at the following location: City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California 92805 Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 2 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 3 May 2016 2 MITIGATION MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRAM CHECKLIST Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date Aesthetics MM 1-1 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan application, where adjacent uses are deemed to be shadow sensitive (e.g., residential, recreational, and pedestrian areas), the property owner/developer for future development projects shall demonstrate that the proposed project would not preclude shadow sensitive receptors’ exposure to natural sunlight for at least 50 percent of duration for the season, for at least 50 percent of the shade-sensitive area, to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. Submittal/ review of shade analysis X Planning Department, Building Division Air Quality MM 2-1 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to reduce construction-related emissions; however, the resultant value is expected to remain significant. a. The contractor shall ensure that all construction equipment is being properly serviced and maintained in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations to reduce operational emissions. b. The contractor shall use Tier 3 or higher, as identified by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, off-road construction equipment with higher air pollutant emissions standards for equipment greater than 50 horsepower, based on manufacturer’s availability. c. The contractor shall utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary diesel- power generators, where feasible. Site inspection Submittal/ review of construction logs X South Coast Air Quality Management District Public Works Department, Construction Services Division Planning Department, Planning Services Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 4 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date MM 2-2 Ongoing during grading and construction, the property owner/developer shall implement the following measures in addition to the existing requirements for fugitive dust control under South Coast Air Quality Management District Rule 403 to further reduce PM10 and PM2.5 emissions. To ensure compliance, the City of Anaheim (City) shall verify compliance that these measures have been implemented during normal construction site inspections. The measures to be implemented are listed below: a. During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall re-establish ground cover on the construction site through seeding and watering as quickly as possible to achieve a minimum control efficiency for PM10 of 5 percent. b. During all grading activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall apply chemical soil stabilizers to on-site haul roads to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 85 percent compared to travel on unpaved, untreated roads. c. The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall phase grading to prevent the susceptibility of large areas to erosion over extended periods of time. d. The property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall schedule activities to minimize the amount of exposed excavated soil during and after the end of work periods. e. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall sweep streets with Rule 1186- compliant PM10-efficient vacuum units on a daily basis if silt is carried over to adjacent public thoroughfares or occurs as a result of hauling. f. During active demolition and debris removal and grading, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall Site inspection Submittal/ review of construction logs X South Coast Air Quality Management District Public Works Department, Construction Services Division Planning Department, Planning Services Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 5 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date suspend demolition and grading operations when wind speeds exceed 25 miles per hour to achieve an emissions control efficiency for PM10 under worst-case wind conditions of 98 percent. g. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall maintain a minimum 12-inch freeboard ratio on haul trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil, or other loose materials and tarp materials with a fabric cover or other suitable means to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 91 percent. h. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall water exposed ground surfaces and disturbed areas a minimum of every 3 hours on the construction site to achieve an emissions reduction control efficiency for PM10 of 61 percent. i. During active demolition and debris removal, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall apply water to disturbed soils at the end of each day to achieve an emission control efficiency for PM10 of 10 percent. j. During scraper unloading and loading, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall ensure that actively disturbed areas maintain a minimum soil moisture content of 12 percent by use of a moveable sprinkler system or water truck to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 69 percent. k. During all construction activities, the property owner/developer’s construction contractor shall limit on-site vehicle speeds on unpaved roads to no more than 15 miles per hour to achieve a control efficiency for PM10 of 57 percent. Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 6 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date MM 2-3 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for Demolition Plans), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans detailing construction and demolition (C&D) recycling and waste reduction measures to be implemented to recover C&D materials. These plans shall include identification of off-site locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site or to an adjacent site, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects if not all can be reused at the project site. Submittal/ review of demolition and import/ export plans X X Planning Department, Planning Services Division Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 2-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that high-solids or water-based low emissions paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with South Coast Air Quality Management District’s regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. Additionally, the property owner/developer’s shall specify the use of high-volume/low-pressure spray equipment or hand application. Air-atomized spray techniques shall not be permitted. Plans shall also show that property owner/developers shall construct/build with materials that do not require painting, or use prepainted construction materials, to the extent feasible. Submittal/ review of plans X South Coast Air Quality Management District MM 2-5 In accordance with the timing required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager, but no later than prior to the first final Building and Zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall implement the following measures to reduce long-term operational CO [carbon monoxide], NOx [oxides of nitrogen], ROG [reactive organic gas], and Submittal/ review of plans Site inspection X X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 7 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date PM10 [particulate matter] emissions: • Traffic lane improvements and signalization as outlined in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Traffic Study Report, Parsons Brinckerhoff, August 2010 and Master Plan of Arterial Highways (MPAH) shall be implemented as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager. • The property owner/contractor shall place bus benches and/or shelters as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager at locations along any site frontage routes as needed. MM 2-6 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property owner/architect shall submit energy calculations used to demonstrate compliance with the performance approach to the California Energy Efficiency Standards to the Building Department that shows each new structure exceeds the applicable Building and Energy Efficiency Standards by a minimum of 10 percent at the time of the building permit. Prior to issuance of a building permit, plans shall show the following: a. Energy-efficient roofing systems, such as vegetated or “cool” roofs, that reduce roof temperatures significantly during the summer and; therefore, reduce the energy requirement for air conditioning. Examples of energy efficient building materials and suppliers can be found at the following website: http://energy.lbl.gov/coolroof/ or other similar websites. b. Cool pavement materials such as lighter-colored pavement materials, porous materials, or permeable or porous pavement, for all roadways and walkways not within the public right-of-way, to minimize the absorption of solar heat and subsequent transfer of heat to its surrounding environment. Examples of cool pavement materials are available at http://www.epa.gov/heat-islands/using-cool-pavements-reduce- heat-islands or other similar websites. Submittal/ review of plans and energy calculations X Planning Department, Building Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 8 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date c. Energy saving devices that achieve the existing 2008 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards, such as use of energy efficient appliances (e.g., EnergyStar® appliances) and use of sunlight-filtering window coatings or double-paned windows. d. Electrical vehicle charging stations for all commercial structures encompassing over 50,000 square-feet. e. Shady trees strategically located within close proximity to the building structure to reduce heat load and resulting energy usage at residential, commercial, and office buildings. MM 2-8 Based on the recommended buffer distances of the California Air Resources Board, applicants for new developments in the Platinum Triangle shall place residential structures and active outdoor recreational areas outside of the recommended buffer distances to the following stationary air pollutant sources: • 1,000 feet from the truck bays with an existing distribution center that accommodates more than 100 trucks per day, more than 40 trucks with operating transport refrigeration units, or where transport refrigeration unit operations exceed 300 hours per week. • 1,000 feet from an existing chrome plating facility. • 300 feet from a dry-cleaning facility using perchloroethylene using one machine and 500 feet from dry-cleaning facility using perchloroethylene using two machines. • 50 feet from gas pumps within a gas-dispensing facility and 300 feet from gas pumps within a gasoline-dispensing facility with a throughput of 3.6 million gallons per year or greater. Submittal/ review of plans X Planning Department, Planning Services Division Hydrology and Water Quality MM 3-1 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans documenting that the design of all aboveground structures (with the exception of parking structures) shall be at least Submittal/ review of plans X Public Works Department, Development Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 9 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date three feet higher that the 100-year flood zone, where applicable, unless otherwise required by the City Engineer. All structures below this level shall be floodproofed to prevent damage to property or harm to people. Services Division MM 3-2 Prior to the initiation of grading activities, for projects greater than one acre, coverage for the project must be obtained by electronically submitting permit registration documents to the state or obtaining coverage via current general construction permit prescribed method by the property owner/developer pursuant to State and Federal National Pollution Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) requirements. As part of the Notice of Intent, a Surface Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) shall be prepared. The property owner/developer shall also prepare and submit to the Development Services Division of the Public Works Department, a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) in accordance with the City of Anaheim’s municipal NPDES requirements and Chapter 7 of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan. The WQMP must be approved prior to issuance of grading permit. The SWPPP, in conjunction with the WQMP, will describe the structural and nonstructural best management practices (BMPs) that will be implemented during construction (short-term) within the project area as well as BMPs for long-term operation of the project area that address potential impacts to surface waters. Submittal/ review of NPDES General Construction Permit, SWPPP, and WQMP X Public Works Department, Development Services Division Noise MM 5-1 Prior to approval of street improvement plans for any project-related roadway widening, the City of Anaheim (City) shall retain a qualified acoustic engineer to design project acoustical features that will limit traffic noise at noise sensitive uses to levels that are below the City’s noise ordinance. These treatments shall be noted on the street improvement plans to the satisfaction of the Planning Department and may include, but are not limited to, the replacement of windows and doors at existing Submittal/ review of acoustical analysis Submittal/ review of plans X Planning Department, Building Division Public Works Department, Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 10 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date residences with acoustically rated windows and doors. Development Services Division MM 5-2 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the project property owner/developers shall submit a final acoustical report prepared to the satisfaction of the Planning Director. The report shall show that the development will be sound-attenuated against present and projected noise levels, including roadway, aircraft, helicopter, stationary sources (e.g., industrial, commercial, stadium), and railroad, to meet City interior and exterior noise standards as follows: a. The report shall demonstrate that the proposed residential design will result in compliance with the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise levels, as required by the California Building Code and California Noise Insulation Standards (Title 24 and 25 of the California Code of Regulations). b. The report shall demonstrate that the proposed project residential design shall minimize nighttime awakening from stadium event noise and train horns such that interior single- event noise levels are below 81 dBA Lmax. The property owner/developer shall submit the noise mitigation report to the Planning Director for review and approval. Upon approval by the City, the project acoustical design features shall be incorporated into construction of the proposed project. Submittal/ review of acoustical analysis Submittal/ review of plans X Planning Department, Building Division MM 5-5 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, to reduce noise and vibration impacts from the impact pile driver, the construction contractor shall evaluate the feasibility of using auger cast piles or a similar system to drill holes to construct cast-in-place piles for a pile- supported transfer slab foundation system. This alternative construction method would reduce the duration necessary for use of the impact pile driver and/or eliminate the need to use pile drivers Submittal/ review of letter from construction contractor X Planning Department, Building Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 11 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date altogether. Proof of compliance with this measure shall be submitted to the Planning Department in the form of a letter from the construction contractor. MM 5-7 Ongoing during grading, demolition, and construction, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring contractors to implement the following measures to limit construction-related noise: a. Noise generated by construction, shall be limited by the property owner/developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries, before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM, as governed by Chapter 6.7, Sound Pressure Levels, of the Anaheim Municipal Code. b. Limit the hours of operation of equipment that produces noise levels noticeably above general construction noise levels to the hours of 10:00 AM to 4:00 PM. c. All internal combustion engines on all of the construction equipment shall be properly outfitted with well-maintained muffler systems. Site inspection Submittal/ review of construction logs X Planning Department, Building Division Public Works Department, Development Services Division MM 5-8 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring project contractors to properly maintain and tune all construction equipment to minimize noise emissions. Site inspection Submittal/ review of construction logs X Planning Department, Building Division MM 5-9 Ongoing during construction activities, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for requiring project contractors to locate all stationary noise sources (e.g., generators, compressors, staging areas) as far from occupied noise-sensitive receptors as is feasible. Site inspection Submittal/ review of construction logs X Planning Department, Building Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 12 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date MM 5-10 Ongoing during construction activities, material delivery, soil haul trucks, and equipment servicing shall also be restricted to the hours set forth in the City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 6.70. Site inspection Submittal/ review of construction logs X Planning Department, Building Division Public Services MM 7-1 Prior to issuance of a Building Permit, plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have fire sprinklers in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed by the property owner/developer prior to each final Building and Zoning inspection. Submittal/ review of plans Site inspection X Fire Department MM 7-2 Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for fire facilities and equipment impact fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36. Submittal of proof of payment of fee X Fire Department MM 7-3 Prior to the approval of Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Department for review and approval for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including implementation of Ordinance 6016 and the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (i.e., building design, circulation, site planning and lighting of parking structure and parking areas). Rooftop addresses shall be provided for all parking structures (for the police helicopter). Minimum size for numbers shall be four feet in height and two feet in width. The lines for the numbers shall be six inches thick and spaced 12 to 18 inches apart. All numbers shall have a contrasting color to the parking structure and shall face the street to which the structure is addressed. Submittal/ review of plans Site inspection X Police Department MM 7-4 Prior to the issuance of each Building Permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Anaheim Police Submittal/ review of plans X Police Department Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 13 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Anaheim Police Department. Said measures shall be implemented prior to final Building and Zoning inspections. MM 7-5 Prior to the approval of Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit design plans that shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Anaheim Police Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Anaheim Police Department. Submittal/ review of plans X Police Department MM 7-6 Ongoing during project operation, if the Anaheim Police Department of Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair-share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. X Police Department Public Works Department, Traffic Management Center MM 7-7 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Public Safety Impact Fee, as amended from time to time, for police facilities and equipment impact fees identified in Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 17.36. Submittal of proof of payment of fee X Police Department MM 7-9 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the school impact fees as adopted by the Board of Trustees of the Anaheim Union High School District and Anaheim City School District in compliance with Senate Bill 50 (Government Code [GC] Section 65995 [b][3] as amended). Submittal of proof of payment of fee X Community Development Department, Redevelopment Services Planning Department, Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 14 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date Planning Services Division Recreation MM 8-2 Ongoing during project implementation, the City shall continue to work with developers to seek alternative means of providing recreational amenities. Coordination with City staff X X Community Development Department, Redevelopment Services Community Services Department, Parks Division Transportation and Traffic MM 9-1 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for each building with commercial, office, and/or institutional uses, the property owners/developer shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office. Objectives of the TDM program shall be: • Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests. • Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project-generated trips. • Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership. Submittal/ review of covenant Submittal/ review of TDM program X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 15 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date MM 9-2 Prior to the first Final Building and Zoning inspection for each building with commercial, office, or institutional uses, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, to include, but not be limited to, the list below. The property owner/developer shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. • On-site services such as the food, retail, and other services be provided. • Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. • Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs. • Transit Pass. Southern California Rapid Transit District and Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes be promoted through financial assistance and on- site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. • Shuttle Service. A commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project be generated, and a local shuttle program offered to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. Submittal/ review of covenant Submittal/ review of TDM program X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 16 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date • Bicycling. A Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers be provided as part of this program, Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. • Guaranteed Ride Home Program. A program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. • Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. An incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. • Stagger work shifts. • Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. • Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem). • Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work. • Access. Preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles may be provided. • Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. (Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit, including commuter rail and/or express bus Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 17 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date pools.) • Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Employees offered financial incentives for bicycling to work. • Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Ticket/passes to special events, vacation, etc. be offered to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. • Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. Every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact who will be responsible for coordinating with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on-site coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the project with the ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. MM 9-3 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, for each building with office and/or commercial uses, the property owner/developer shall join and financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program, if established and, shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network/Transportation Management Association in conjunction with the on-going operation of the project. The property owner/developer shall also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in the program ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. Submittal of proof of participation in clean fuel shuttle program and/or Anaheim Transportation Network/ Transportation Management Association Submittal/ X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 18 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date review of covenant MM 9-4 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees, Traffic Impact and Improvement Fees, and Platinum Triangle Impact Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the property owner/developer; and participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established. Submittal of proof of payment of fee X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 9-5 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan. Submittal of proof of offer for dedication X Public Works Department, Development Services MM 9-6 Prior to approval of a Development Agreement for any project forecast to generate 100 or more peak hour trips, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager utilizing Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model Trip Generation Rates, property owner/developers shall prepare traffic improvement phasing analyses to identify when the improvements identified in the Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Project Draft Traffic Study Report, Parson Brinkerhoff, August 2010 (Appendix F of the SEIR) shall be designed and constructed. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to implement traffic improvements as identified in the project traffic study to maintain satisfactory levels of Submittal/ review of traffic analysis X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 19 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date service as defined by the City’s General Plan, based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339, Orange County Congestion Management Program and established in City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. MM 9-7 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. The improvement phasing analyses will specify the timing, funding, construction and fair-share responsibilities for all traffic improvements necessary to maintain satisfactory levels of service within the City of Anaheim and surrounding jurisdictions. At minimum, fair-share calculations shall include intersection improvements, rights-of-way, and construction costs, unless alternative funding sources have been identified to help pay for the improvement. The Development Agreement Conditions of Approval shall require the property owner/developer to construct, bond for or enter into a funding agreement for necessary circulation system improvements, as Submittal/ review of traffic analysis X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 20 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager, unless alternative funding sources have been identified. MM 9-8 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, the following actions shall be taken in cooperation with the City of Orange: a. The traffic improvement phasing analysis shall identify any impacts created by the project on facilities within the City of Orange. The fair-share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts shall be calculated in this analysis. b. The City of Anaheim shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair- share responsibility in cooperation with the City of Orange. c. The proposed project shall pay the City of Anaheim the fair- share cost prior to issuance of a building permit. The City of Anaheim shall hold the amount received in trust, and then, once a mutually agreed upon joint program is executed by both cities, the City of Anaheim shall allocate the fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow at the impacted locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to both cities. d. The City shall work with the City of Orange to amend the Joint Communities Facilities Agreement (JCFA) to ensure that fair share fees collected to mitigate arterial and intersection impacts in the City or Orange are mitigated to the extent feasible. Submittal/ review of traffic analysis X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 9-9 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, and assuming that a regional transportation agency has not already programmed and funded the warranted improvements to the impacted freeway mainline or freeway ramp locations, property owners/developers and the City will take the following actions in cooperation with Caltrans: a. The traffic study will identify the project’s proportionate impact Submittal/ review of traffic analysis X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 21 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date on the specific freeway mainline and/or freeway ramp locations and its fair share percentage responsibility for mitigating these impacts based on thresholds of significance, performance standards and methodologies utilized in SEIR No. 339 and established in the Orange County Congestion Management Program and City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines. b. The City shall estimate the cost of the project’s fair-share responsibility in cooperation with Caltrans. MM 9-10 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of a Building Permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair-share responsibility as determined by the City of Anaheim (City) as set forth in Mitigation Measure 9-9. The City shall allocate the property owners/developers fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City. Submittal of proof of payment of fee X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 9-11 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan and consistent with the adopted Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, regardless of the level of impacts generated by the project. Submittal of proof of offer for dedication X Public Works Department, Development Services MM 9-13 Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, for each building with office and/or commercial uses, the property owner/developer shall submit proof to the Public Works, Transit Planning Division that the property owner/developer has entered into an agreement with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) for the provision of a transit Submittal of proof of agreement with Anaheim Transportation X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 22 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date shuttle service between the project, the existing Metrolink Station and future Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) as well as major activity centers in between. The agreement shall be recorded in the Official Records of the Office of the County Recorder, Orange County, California. The form of the agreement shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. The agreement shall provide for the following: a A shuttle route plan, approved by the Public Works Department, Transit Planning Division and ATN, shall be attached and incorporated into the agreement. The plan shall include co- location of stops with Orange County Transportation Authority bus stop locations and other properties in the Platinum Triangle where feasible and determined appropriate by the Public Works Transit Planning Division and ATN. The property owner/developer shall pay all costs associated with the preparation of the shuttle route plan. b The property owner/developer shall provide the full cost associated with providing the shuttle, including, but not limited to, purchasing the shuttle vehicle and all costs associated with operating and marketing the shuttle route. c The agreement shall provide a mechanism for the property owner/developer to request fair share participation from other major activity centers to be served by this shuttle route. The mechanism shall be subject to the approval of the ATN. d The agreement shall set forth a schedule for commencement of operation of the shuttle service. e The agreement shall provide that the property owner/developer's obligations to fund the shuttle service may be cancelled only upon prior written approval from the Public Works Department, Transit Planning Division's once a new Network City Attorney’s Office Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 23 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date transit service has taken its place. f That to the extent permitted by law the terms of this agreement shall constitute covenants which shall run with the property for the benefit thereof, and the benefits of this agreement shall bind and inure to the benefit of the parties and all successors in interest to the parties hereto. MM 9-14 In conjunction with the preparation of any traffic improvement phasing analyses as required in Mitigation Measure 9-6, property owners/developers will analyze to determine when the intersection improvements identified under Impact 5.9-4 shall be constructed, subject to the conditions identified in Mitigation Measure 9-6. Submittal/ review of traffic analysis X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division MM 9-15 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). Coordination with staff Submittal/ review of plans X Public Works Department, Traffic and Transportation Division Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) Utilities and Service Systems MM 10-1 The City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located within an area served by deficient sewer facilities, as identified in the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. If the project will increase sewer flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate master plan sewer study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient sewer system or will create a deficiency in an existing sewer line, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact Submittal/ review of sewer facilities plans Submittal of proof of payment of fee X Public Works Department, Development Services Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 24 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the latest updated sewer study for The Platinum Triangle. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the project area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof. MM 10-2 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will be upsizing trunk lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner/developer shall coordinate with the OCSD to ensure that all improvements and construction schedules are coordinated. Submittal of proof of coordination with OCSD X X Public Works Department, Development Services Division MM 10-3 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit for each development project, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall contact Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) regarding sewer capacity. Additionally, if requested by the OCSD, the property owner/developer shall place up to three flow monitoring devices for up to a month to verify capacity and ensure consistency with the OCSD’s modeling results. Submittal of proof of coordination with OCSD X Public Works Department, Development Services Division MM 10-4 Prior to approval of sanitary sewer connections for each development project, the property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as required by the City Engineer, to prevent the sewer spill for below-grade structures of the proposed development based upon the latest updated sewer study for the Platinum Triangle. Submittal/ review of sanitary sewer facilities plans X X Public Works Department, Development Services Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 25 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date Where requested by the City Engineer, sewer improvements shall be constructed with larger than recommended diameter to maintain the surcharge levels within the pipe and the invert elevation of sewer laterals shall be located above the hydraulic grade line elevation of the surcharge levels when they are above the pipe crown. MM 10-5 Prior to the approval and ongoing during construction of any street improvement plans within the Platinum Triangle, which encompass area(s) where the Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) will be upsizing truck lines and/or are making other improvements, the City and/or property owner shall coordinate with OCSD to ensure that backflow prevention devices are installed at the lateral connections to prevent surcharge flow from entering private properties. Submittal of proof of coordination with OCSD X X Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) MM 10-6 Prior to final design approval, additional analysis shall be performed for each individual project using flow, wet-weather data, and other information specific for that project in order to obtain more accurate results of the surcharge levels for final design. Submittal/ review of surcharge levels analysis X Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division MM 10-7 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans shall demonstrate compliance with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AB 1881). Among the measures to be implemented with the project are the following: • Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials wherever Submittal/ review of plans X Public Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Division Public Works Department, Development Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 26 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date feasible; • Use of vacuums and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash down of exterior areas; • Low-flow fittings, fixtures and equipment including low flush toilets and urinals; • Use of self-closing valves for drinking fountains; • Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors; • Infrared sensors on sinks, toilets and urinals; • Low-flow shower heads in hotels; • Infrared sensors on drinking fountains; • Use of irrigation systems primarily at night, when evaporation rates are lowest; • Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water using appliances; • Cooling tower recirculating system; • Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system; • Use of waterway recirculation systems; • Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation; and • Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and washdown when it becomes available. In conjunction with submittal of landscape and building plans, the applicant shall identify which of these measures have been incorporated into the plans. Services Division MM 10-8 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide engineering studies, including network analysis, to size the water mains for ultimate development within the project. This includes detailed water usage analysis and building plans Submittal/ review of engineering studies X Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 27 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date for Public Utilities Water Engineering reviews and approval in determining project water requirements and appropriate water assessment fees. Division MM 10-9 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation meter when the total landscaped area exceeds 2,500 square feet (City of Anaheim Water Conservation Measures). Submittal/ review of plans X Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division MM 10-12 Prior to issuance of a building permit, submitted landscape plans for all residential, office and commercial landscaping shall demonstrate the use of drought tolerant plant materials pursuant to the publication entitled “Water Use Efficiency of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. Submittal/ review of plans X Public Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Division MM 10-13 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans water efficient design features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water faucets, and water efficient appliances. Submittal/ review of plans X Public Utilities Department, Resource Efficiency Division MM 10-14 Prior to issuance of a building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans installation of a separate irrigation lines for recycled water. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. Submittal/ review of plans X Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division MM 10-15 Prior to approval of a project that exceeds the statutory thresholds set forth in Senate Bill (SB) 610 and SB 221, the applicant shall demonstrate to the City Engineer that adequate water supply exists to serve the proposed project. If it cannot be demonstrated that adequate water exists to serve the specific project, the project shall not be approved. Submittal/ review of water supply/demand projections X Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 28 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date MM 10-17 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the City Engineer shall review the location of each project to determine if it is located within an area served by deficient drainage facilities, as identified in the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area. If the project will increase stormwater flows beyond those programmed in the appropriate master plan drainage study for the area or if the project currently discharges to an existing deficient storm drain system or will create a deficiency in an existing storm drain, the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation of the impact to adequately serve the area to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the drainage facilities, as required by the City Engineer to mitigate the impacts of the proposed development based upon the Development Mitigation within Benefit Zones of the Master Plan of Storm Drainage for East Garden Grove Wintersburg Channel Tributary Area, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final Building and Zoning inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, if adopted for the Project Area, as determined by the City Engineer, which could include fees credits, reimbursements, construction, or a combination thereof. Submittal/ review of drainage facilities plans Submittal of proof of payment of fee X Public Works Department, Development Services Division MM 10-18 Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim. Implementation of said plan shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Submittal/ review of plans X Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 29 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date Sanitation Division and may include, at its discretion, the following plan components: • Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities. • Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency. • Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and bailing. • Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and number of trips required for collection. • Providing on-site recycling receptacles accessible to the public to encourage recycling for all businesses, employees, and patrons where feasible. • Prohibiting curbside pick-up. • Ensuring hazardous materials disposal complies with federal, state, and city regulations. MM 10-19 Ongoing during project operations, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer: • Usage of recycled paper products for stationery, letterhead, and packaging. • Recovery of materials, such as aluminum and cardboard. • Collection of office paper for recycling. • Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. Submittal of operational logs Site inspection X Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division MM 10-20 Prior to the approval of each grading plan (for import/export plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permits (for demolition plans), the property owner/developer shall submit a Demolition and Import/Export Submittal/ review of demolition and X X Public Works Department, Streets and Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 30 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date Plans, if determined to be necessary by the Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division and/or Street and Sanitation Division. The plans shall include identification of off-site locations for material export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials on-site, sale to a broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if all cannot be reused on the project site. import/export plans Sanitation Division Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering Division MM 10-21 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that each structure will exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations) by a minimum of 10 percent and will consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department Business and Community Programs Division. This consultation shall take place during project design in order to review Title 24 measures that are incorporated into the project design energy efficient practices and allow potential system alternatives such as thermal energy storage air condition, lighting, and building envelope options. Plans submitted for building permits shall show the proposed energy efficiencies and systems alternatives. Submittal/ review of plans and energy calculations X Public Utilities Department, Business and Community Programs Division MM 10-22 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall indicate on plans energy-saving practices that will be implemented with the project in compliance with Title 24, which may include the following: • High-efficiency air-conditioning with EMS (computer) control. • Variable Air Volume (VAV) air distribution. • Outside air (100 percent) economizer cycle. Submittal/ review of plans X Public Utilities Department, Business and Community Programs Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 31 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date • Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads. • Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas. • Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air handling units, and fan-coil units). • Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces. • Use of compact fluorescent lamps. • Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps. • Use of EnergyStar® exit lighting or exit signage. • Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified. • Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high-pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots. • Consideration of thermal energy storage air conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods. • Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: • New construction design review, in which the City cost- shares engineering for up to $15,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems. • New Construction – Cash incentives $400 kW or $0.15 per kWh saved for each measure and up to $200,000 per facility for efficiency that exceed Title 24 requirements. • Green Building Program – Offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance. • Use of high efficiency toilets (1.28 gallons per flush (gpf) or less). Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 32 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date • Use of zero to low water use urinals (0.0 gpf to 0.25 gpf). • Use of weather-based irrigation controllers for outdoor irrigation. • Use of draught-tolerant and native plants in outdoor landscaping. MM 10-23 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of Underground Systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities: • Relocate Southern California Edison transmission line underground on Katella Avenue from west of the Union Pacific Railroad to Lewis Street (850 feet). • Relocate Southern California Edison communication line underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to east of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet). • Relocate distribution circuits underground on Katella Avenue from Lewis Street to 700 feet west of State College Boulevard (2,400 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from Anaheim Way to State College Boulevard (1,500 feet). • Relocation a distribution circuit underground on Orangewood Avenue from State College Boulevard to west of the Santa Ana Submittal/ review of electrical utilities plans X Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 33 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date River (1,600 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College Boulevard (2,500 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Lewis Street from Katella Avenue to Gene Autry Way (950 feet). • Relocate a distribution circuit underground on Douglas Street from Katella Avenue to Cerritos Avenue (1,000 feet). MM 10-24 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans for review and approval which shall ensure that buildings exceed the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code) by a minimum of 10 percent. Submittal/ review of plans X Public Utilities Department, Business and Community Programs Division MM 10-25 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall install their portion of the underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System as determined by the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications of underground systems. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations or another financial mechanism approved by the City. The underground electrical service will consist of the following improvements to the current electric facilities: • Two new distribution duct banks on Katella Avenue from Anaheim Way to Lewis Street (800 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Katella Avenue from Douglas Road to Howell Avenue (2,000 feet). Submittal/ review of electrical utilities plans X Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 34 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date • A new distribution duct bank on State College Boulevard from Cerritos Avenue to Katella Avenue (2,600 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Orangewood Avenue from I-5 to the Santa Ana River (4,800 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from Haster Street to the east side of I-5 (2,500 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Gene Autry Way from I-5 to State College Boulevard (2,500 feet). • A new transmission duct bank on Anaheim Way from 700 feet north of Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,400 feet). • A new transmission duct bank on Lewis Street and Santa Cruz Street from Katella Avenue to Orangewood Avenue (3,000 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on the east side of the Angel Stadium parking lot from Orangewood Avenue to the SR-57 (2,000 feet). • A new distribution duct bank on Douglas Road from SR-57 to Cerritos Avenue (4,000 feet). MM 10-26 Prior to issuance of each building permit or grading permit, the property owner/developer shall provide an electrical load analysis to the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department (APUD). The analysis shall include a load schedule and maximum electrical coincident demand. Should the property owner/developer’s load analysis result in a contributed load forecast to exceed 20 mega volt-amperes (MVA) above the existing 40 MVA capacity of the electrical system currently serving the Platinum Triangle area, the APUD will initiate construction of a new electrical substation within the Platinum Triangle project area. Electrical service fees and other applicable fees for the electrical substation will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations, or another financial mechanism approved by the City. Submittal/ review of electrical load analysis X Public Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9289.1 35 May 2016 Table 1 Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program Checklist Mitigation Measure No. Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Method of Verification Timing of Verification Responsible Party Completed Comments Pre Const. During Const. Post Cost. Initials Date Greenhouse Gas Emissions Various MMs Mitigation measures for greenhouse gas emissions are composed of mitigation measures used for other environmental topical sections of SEIR No. 339 and are listed above. These mitigation measures, specified on Table 1-1 in the Executive Summary of SEIR No. 339, would reduce GHG emissions associated with the proposed project and are consistent with the California Attorney General’s mitigation measures for energy efficiency, renewable energy and storage, water conservation and efficiency, solid waste, land use, transportation and motor vehicle, and agriculture and forestry measures. There are no additional mitigation measures identified for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions impacts. Method of verification is identified for each individual mitigation measure Implementation timing is identified for each individual mitigation measure Responsible parties are identified for each individual mitigation measure Jefferson Stadium Park Project Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program 9051 36 May 2016 INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.