RA1994/08/09Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9. 1994, 5 :00 P.M.
PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: James Ruth
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
SECRETARY: Leonora N. Sohl
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Lisa Stipkovich
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment
Agency was posted at 3:00 p.m. on August 5, 1994 at the Civic Center kiosk,
containing all items as shown herein.
Chairman Daly called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
to order at 5:42 p.m.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY in the amount of
$219,013.01 in accordance with the 1994 -95 Budget, were approved.
ADDITIONS TO THE AGENDA: There were no additions to agenda items.
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST:
Jeff Kirsch. His comment is relative to the first item, the proposed Recovery
Plan for the Anaheim Stadium Project. The public hearing portion was closed
at the last meeting. He re- emphasized that $9 million of tax money has a
higher priority for him than the private profits of those who are tenants of
Anaheim Stadium. The project is unnecessary for its stated, named purpose.
Closing the gap of meeting a mere $500,000 amount to complete the repairs that
the City has already advanced shows him the project is unnecessary for that
purpose.
Mayor Daly reconvened the meeting of the City Council for a joint meeting with
the Redevelopment Agency /City Council and Community Redevelopment Commission.
Chairman of the Community Redevelopment Commission, Paul McMillan called the
commission to order. Commission Members present: Paul McMillan, Paul
Bostwick, Thomas Holguin, Bob Linn, Cheryl Perreira, Mary Ruth Pinson, Doug
Renner. Commission Members absent: None.
1. 161: 5:00 P.M. CONTINUED JOINT MEETING - REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY /CITY
COUNCIL /COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION TO CONSIDER AND ACT UPON THE
PROPOSED RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT:
This hearing was continued from the meeting of August 2, 1994, to this date.
The Public Hearing portion was closed at the meeting of August 2, 1994 (see
minutes of that date).
Lisa Stipkovich, Executive Director of Community Development. She re-
introduced the item noting that it was continued from the meeting of August 2,
1994 to this date. She noted that at approximately 3:57 p.m. today, a letter
from Augustini and Wheeler was received, faxed to the City Clerk's office in
connection with the public hearing and copied for the Council, Agency and
Commission Members, (made a part of the record).
Mayor /Chairman Daly asked to hear from the City Attorney regarding the letter
received.
94 -57
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5:00 P.M.
City Attorney Jack White. He has reviewed the contents of the letter and
because the public participation portion of the hearing was closed last
Tuesday, has deemed that the letter is untimely and under the requirements of
applicable law, need not be responded to nor should it be considered as part
of the hearing.
Mayor /Chairman Daly asked to hear from the Executive Director of Community
Development.
Lisa Stipkovich, Executive Director of Community Development. She briefed the
joint meeting on some of the actions staff has taken since last week's
meeting. They have prepared documents and submitted them to the
Agency /Council /Commission as part of their regular agenda packet. Most of the
items reflect a change due to the proposed change in the name of the project
simplifying it to the Anaheim Stadium Recovery Project. There are also other
minor changes as noted in the staff report. She also submitted for the record
written responses to written objections in the form of Exhibit A to the
resolution being proposed for adoption by the Council and Agency. She then
briefed the findings as contained in Exhibit A (made a part of the record)
pages 1 -3, regarding the following: claim of inadequate notice, claim of
inclusion, claim of improper interference, claim of failure to comply with
CEQA, claim of failure to show that the plan is consistent with the general
plan and claim of improper reallocation of tax increment funds.
She then summarized the oral objections voiced at the previous meeting
consolidating them into general areas of concern. Several questions and
comments were put forth relating to the need for the project area, the timing
of the disaster and when the repairs were completed and the need to go forward
beyond the disaster repairs and dealing with long term problems, retention or
addition of a sports franchise and was it appropriate to look at that issue.
The need to go forward as soon as possible was to mitigate losses of revenue
and to comply with contractual obligations. There is no limitation on the
project, once it is adopted, to only deal with the disaster and when adopted
becomes a redevelopment area. It would be short sighted for the Agency not to
use the plan as a partial tool to assist the City in the real challenges it
faces today and in the future. The objectives are appropriate and fully
allowed under state law.
Relative to the reallocation of taxes, economic feasibility and amount of
funds actually needed, disaster law provides for redistribution of property
taxes just as any other redevelopment project. The current tax base still
goes to those tax entities. The Agency must pay a specific portion of the new
tax increment to all the taxing agencies as defined by the redevelopment law
effective January 1, 1994.
Relative to the report to the Council, it is a feasibility analysis as to
whether the project makes sense economically. The report is not intended to
address any future plans which may result from other land use action and the
economic analysis the City is currently undertaking. Relative to surrounding
parcels not needing redevelopment, she re- emphasized that the only portion of
the area being considered for the Disaster Project designation is the Stadium
and City owned parcels.
Mayor /Chairman Daly asked if there were any questions of Council, Agency or
Commission Members. If none, the separate bodies will now take action on the
matters before them.
94 -58
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5 :00 P.M.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION:
MOTION: Commission Member Bostwick moved to approve the modification to the
Rules Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Re -Entry
and Preferences by Business Occupants in the Anaheim Stadium Project and
recommending that the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency approve and adopt said
Rules. Commission Member Renner seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION: Commission Member Holquin moved to approve a revised report to City
Council on the Proposed Recovery Plan for the Anaheim Stadium Project and
authorizing submittal of the Report to the City Council. Commissioner
Perreira seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Commissioner Linn offered Resolution No. CRC94 -6 for adoption approving and
adopting the Recovery Plan for the Anaheim Stadium Project, and recommending
City Council approval. Commissioner Holquin seconded the offering of the
resolution. The resolution was adopted all ayes.
RESOLUTION NO. CRC94 -6: (COMM REDEV COMM) APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE
RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT, AND RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL
APPROVAL.
REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY:
Agency Member Daly offered Resolutions ARA94 -11 through ARA94 -14, both
inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA94 -11: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FINDING THAT THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT IS EXEMPT, BY STATUTE, FROM THE
REQUIREMENTS OF CEQA.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA94 -12: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING AND ADOPTING RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES BY
PROPERTY OWNERS AND RE -ENTRY AND PREFERENCES BY BUSINESS OCCUPANTS IN THE
ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA94 -13: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING AND ADOPTING THE RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT, AND
RECOMMENDING CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA94 -14: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT FOR
THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING AND INCREASING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF LOW AND
MODERATE- INCOME HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT TO THE
PROJECT.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. ARA94 -11 through ARA94R -14, both inclusive,
for adoption:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
The Chairman declared Resolution Nos. ARA94 -11 through ARA94 -14, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
94 -59
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5:00 P.M.
CITY COUNCIL:
Council Member Daly offered Resolutions 94R -185 through 94R -188, both
inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 94R -185: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM RECEIVING THE PROPOSED RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT
AND THE AGENCY'S REPORT ON THE RECOVERY PLAN.
RESOLUTION NO. 94R -186: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING THAT THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT IS EXEMPT, BY STATUTE, FROM
THE REQUIREMENTS OF CEQA.
RESOLUTION NO. 94R -187: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING THAT THE USE OF TAXES ALLOCATED FROM THE ANAHEIM STADIUM
PROJECT FOR THE PURPOSE OF IMPROVING AND INCREASING THE COMMUNITY'S SUPPLY OF
LOW - AND MODERATE- INCOhz HOUSING OUTSIDE THE PROJECT AREA WILL BE OF BENEFIT
TO THE PROJECT.
RESOLUTION NO. 94R -188: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM OVERRULING ORAL OBJECTIONS AND ADOPTING WRITTEN FINDINGS IN RESPONSE
TO WRITTEN OBJECTIONS RECEIVED AND OVERRULING SUCH WRITTEN OBJECTIONS TO THE
RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 94R -185 through 94R -188, both inclusive, for
adoption:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 94R -185 through 94R -188, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Daly offered Ordinance No. 5442 as an urgency ordinance for
adoption approving and adopting the Recovery Plan for the Anaheim Stadium
Project. Refer to Ordinance Book.
City attorney Jack White then read Ordinance 5442 in full.
ORDINANCE NO. 5442 (UP!'ENCY): AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
AND ADOPTING THE RECOVERY PLAN FOR THE ANAHEIM STADIUM PROJECT.
Roll Call Vote on Ordinance No. 5442 for adoption:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 5442 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT - COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION: Chairman McMillan moved to
adjourn the Community Redevelopment Commission meeting. Commissioner Linn
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (6:34 p.m.)
94 -60
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5:00 P.M.
ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
5:00 P.M. JOINT PUBLIC HEAR ING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL:
2. 123: DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT WITH DISC MANUFACTURING INC
To consider adopting a Resolution approving the Disposition and Development
Agreement (in final form) by and among the City of Anaheim, the Anaheim
Redevelopment Agency, and Disc Manufacturing, Inc.
Submitted was joint report dated August 9, 1994 from the Community Development
Department and Utilities Department recommending approval of the Disposition
and Development Agreement. The report gave the background of the proposal as
well as a discussion and a summary of the Agreement.
Lisa Stipkovich, Executive Director of Community Development first noted the
actions that were to be taken by the Council /Agency on the subject and
subsequently highlighted the Agreement (see summary as contained in Staff
Report of August 9, 1994). She also summarized what the Utilities Department
is contributing to the proposal.
Mayor /Chairman Daly opened the public hearing and asked to hear from anyone
who wished to speak on the subject Disposition and Development Agreement with
Disc Manufacturing, Inc.
No one spoke either in favor or in opposition.
Mayor /Chairman Daly closed the public hearing.
Agency Member Daly offered Resolution ARA94 -15 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA94 -15: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND DISC
MANUFACTURING INC., AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution No. ARA94 -15 for adoption:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: done
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA94 -15 duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Daly offered Resolution No. 94R -189 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 94R -189: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE APPROVAL BY THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY OF THE
DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT (DDA) BY AND AMONG THE REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY, THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND DISC MANUFACTURING INC., AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH.
94 -61
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5 :00 P.M.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution No. 94R -189 for adoption:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 94R -189 duly passed and adopted.
MOTION: Agency Member Pickler moved to approve the DDA, in substantially
final form, by and among the City, the Agency and DMI, with such changes as
are in substantial conformance with the attached Agreement. Agency Member
Simpson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
5:00 P.M. JOINT PUBLIC HEARING WITH THE CITY COUNCIL:
3. 123: DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT
AGENCY DISNEY GOALS INC AND DCSR INC. • AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS• AND
APPROVING BASIC CONCEPT DRAWINGS:
To consider adopting a Resolution approving the Disposition and Development
Agreement (in final form) by and among the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency,
Disney GOALS, Inc., and DCSR, Inc., and making certain findings in connection
therewith; and approving the Basic Concept Drawings, conditioned on review and
approval of landscape plans, related to the Community Ice Rink.
Submitted was report dated August 9, 1994 from the Community Development
Department, Lisa Stipkovich, outlining a number of technical and clarifying
revisions made to the version of the Disposition and Development Agreement
(DDA) which was submitted in the Council /Agency agenda packet. (See items 1 -17
on page 1 and 2 of the report.)
Submitted for today's meeting was Supplemental Staff Report dated August 9,
1994, also from Lisa Stipkovich.
Lisa Stipkovich. This is a joint public hearing which is required by
redevelopment law wherever a disposition or sale of land is involved. She
then gave a brief overview of the terms of the agreement (DDA) by and between
Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, Disney GOALS, Inc., and DCSR, Inc.). She also
briefed the analysis of the summary provided by Keyser Marston Associates,
Inc. It shows that the Agency has expended approximately $3.4 million in
acquiring this site and off site improvements and also parking either in a
structure or flat parking to accommodate the use. A total of $4.3 million was
then used to establish the amount of services Disney would have to provide
ongoing to the City for 30 years. She then explained the process that was
followed.
In concluding, she statcd staff is recommending that the Agreement be adopted.
The project is not only economically sound in terms of services being provided
in exchange for the land but also, believes it will be the catalyst for other
development in downtown, and complements the other commercial and civic uses.
She also pointed out that approval of building materials should have been
included. That item is being added at this time.
94 -62
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5:00 P.N.
Bruce Berg, Director of Development and President of Disney GOALS, commented
that this is a project they have been working on for over a year. They are
very excited about the prospect of building the ice rink in downtown Anaheim.
As with all Disney projects, they place emphasis on the quality of service
they provide and the quality of design. They hired the Frank Gehry Firm,
Frank Gehry and Associates, world famous architects. He then gave the
background of the project from its inception to date.
David Wilke, Founder of the Disney GOALS Program. He explained the ground
work he laid since he has been in the City visiting various neighborhoods and
promoting the program. The idea of working in troubled neighborhoods is what
they are doing - in Jeffrey Lynne, Ponderosa Park and Guinida Lane. Those are
the areas they are going into the first year. His extensive presentation
covered the specifics of the program.
Michael Kellerman, Firm of Frank Gehry & Associates. The rink is intended to
be as dynamic as the program Disney is trying to institute. He then briefed
the plans working from the posted exhibits, site plans, elevations and the
interior. A model was also displayed. It is a dual rink facility with an NHL
size rink and an Olympic size rink and will include a pro shop, a large sky
lit lobby, skate rental and snack bar. They are also trying to preserve views
into both of the rinks. He then explained the signage and the building
materials. The exterior of the building will be aluminum which is etched and
has a clear anodizing. It will have a certain amount of brightness to it.
(He showed a sample of the material to be used.) Mr. Kellerman then explained
for Mayor /Chairman Daly that the anodizing is intended to preserve the
longevity of the material allowing what is considered a life time quality,
perhaps for 25 years. It should be low maintenance and preserve the
appearance of the building throughout its life.
Mayor /Chairman Daly open the public hearing.
Jeff Kirsch, 2661 W. Palais, Anaheim. He is wondering how parking demands are
intended to be satisfied since the proposal is a parking intensive use and
will it leave sufficient parking for the satellite campus of a local academic
institution proposed on a nearby parcel. Further, they are trading a piece of
land with a value of $4.3 million for programs over time. He asked what
mechanisms exist in the agreements to assure that there will be the ability to
provide those programs for the full time.
Phil Knypstra, 2520 Gelid Avenue, Anaheim. He asked if this will have any
economic impact on the new skating rink located on Cerritos. Also is Disney
going to own the property and is the $4.3 million going to part of the
property tax base plus the cost of construction. If so, he feels the proposal
is a good one.
Andy Jimenez, Anaheim Police Department. He represents the Anaheim HEAT, a
hockey team made up of Anaheim fire fighters and police officers. He
explained the goal of the Anaheim HEAT is to introduce hockey to the youth of
Anaheim and, in addition, raise money for children's organizations and the
youth of the community to combat gangs and drugs. (He submitted an
explanation sheet signets by Ftre Chief Jeff Bowman.) After explaining some
details of the program, he confirmed that Anaheim HEAT is in support of the
Disney GOALS and the proposed community ice rink.
94 -63
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5:00 P.M.
William Taormina, P.O. Box 209, Anaheim. He expressed how happy he was over
the project proposed today. He has lived in Anaheim for 43 years, owns
property in the City and lives within a few blocks of the site of the ice
rink. He obtained all the public information on the project and shared it
with 400 people at a July 4th block party attended by area residents. He then
read the letter which he subsequently submitted to the Council, the first
sentence of which stated, "It is with a great deal of pride and anticipation
that I express to you my absolute support of the Disney GOALS Project slated
for downtown Anaheim."
Mayor /Chairman Daly closed the public hearing.
Mayor /Chairman Daly. Mr. Taurmina's comments reflect a lot of what he has
heard relative to the proposed project. It is going to be a real milestone
for all of the City and the beginning of many good things that are going to
happen.
The architect then answered questions posed by Council /Agency Members relative
to uses, signage, parking, etc.
Lisa Stipkovich then answered questions posed by members of the public
relative to adequacy of parking, how they are going to insure that services
will be provided for the 30 year term, and the property tax issue noting that
the property is going to be on the tax rolls which will reflect the land value
and improvements. She then answered additional questions posed by the
Mayor /Chairman relative to hardscape and landscape and additional questions
relative to parking. She emphasized that the hardscape and landscape issues
will be coming back at a later date as well as the other matters discussed.
All they are asking for tonight is approval of the basic concept drawings and
added to that approval of the specific building materials.
Agency Member Pickler offered Resolution ARA94 -16 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. ARA94 -16: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT
AGREEMENT BY AND AMONG THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DISNEY GOALS, INC, AND DCSR,
INC., AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION HEREWITH.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution No. ARA94 -16 for adoption:
AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None
The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA94 -16 duly passed and adopted.
Council Member Pickler offered Resolution 94 -190 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 94R -190: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CONSENTING TO THE APPROVAL OF A DISPOSITION AND DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT
BY AND AMONG THE REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, DISNEY GOALS, INC, AND DCSR, INC., AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION HEREWITH.
94 -64
Anaheim Civic Center, ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY
August 9, 1994, 5:00 P.M.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution No. 94R -190 for adoption:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Simpson, Pickler, Hunter, Daly
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 94R -190 duly passed and adopted.
MOTION: Agency Member Pickler moved to approve the basic concept drawings
related to the community ice rink including the proposed building materials as
explained and shown by the architects representative. Agency Member Daly
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council meeting was then recessed until after the conclusion of the
Redevelopment Agency Meeting and the meeting of the Anaheim Housing Authority.
(7:30 p.m.)
ADJOURNMENT: Agency Member Daly moved to adjourn the meeting of the Anaheim
Redevelopment Agency, Agency Member Simpson seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED. (7:31 p.m.)
v-
LEONORA N. SOHL, SECRETARY
94 -65