The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2017/01/09 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, January 9, 2017 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California  Chairperson: Mitchell Caldwell  Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Paul Bostwick  Commissioners: Jess Carbajal, Bill Dalati, Grant Henninger, Michelle Lieberman, John Seymour  Call To Order - 5:00 p.m.  Pledge Of Allegiance  Public Comments  Consent Calendar  Public Hearing Items  Commission Updates  Discussion  Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, January 5, 2017, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 01-09-2017 Page 2 of 7 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 01-09-2017 Page 3 of 7 Consent Calendar The items on the Consent Calendar will be acted on by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Planning Commission, staff, or the public request the item to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Reports and Recommendations ITEM NO. 1A TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2016-140 (DEV2016-00054) Location: 123 North Rio Vista Street Request: To correct an inadvertent error related to the assignment of the tentative parcel map number in conjunction with a previously-approved reclassification and 2-lot single family residential subdivision. Motion Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho wcarvalho@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1B CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05678 (DEV2013-00072) Location: 1256 North Magnolia Avenue Request: A six-month compliance review of a conditional use permit for an existing storage facility to include a temporary modular office trailer, indoor and outdoor storage of recreational and commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, miscellaneous equipment, and auto repair services. Motion Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net 01-09-2017 Page 4 of 7 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077 FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 (DEV2016-00055) Location: 200 and 205 West Alro Way Request: To demolish a vacant commercial building (formerly Bergstrom’s Childrens Store) and construct a new five-story, 174-room hotel with a narrower street landscape setback, narrower interior building and landscape setbacks, more wall signs than allowed, and fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider if an Addendum to the previously-certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 311 (FEIR 311) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 (SEIR 340) is the appropriate environmental document for this project and that none of the conditions set forth in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact report or a supplement to FEIR 311 or SEIR 340 have occurred. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Elaine Thienprasiddhi ethien@anaheim.net 01-09-2017 Page 5 of 7 ITEM NO. 3 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2015-00503 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2015-00127 MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2016-00636 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05877 TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 17994 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 2016-00004 (DEV2014-00124) Location: 1700 South Lewis Street Request: The following land use entitlements are requested to permit development of an 153-unit attached single-family residential project: 1) a General Plan Amendment to change the property’s land use designation from Office-Low to Mixed Use and to increase the total amount of residential development permitted in the Platinum Triangle Mixed-Use land use designation to 17,501 dwelling units and decrease the total amount of office development permitted in the Platinum Triangle Office-High and Office-Low land use designations to 4,309,486; 2) a Zoning Code Amendment and an amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan to establish the Lewis District and associated development standards and reflect the change in development intensity described above; 3) a conditional use permit to permit a 153-unit attached single-family residential project with modified setbacks between buildings; 4) a Tentative Tract Map to create a 31-lot, 153 unit residential subdivision for condominium purposes; and, 5) a Development Agreement to allow development of the proposed project described above. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether a Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request under the California Environmental Quality Act. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net Resolution No. ______ 01-09-2017 Page 6 of 7 ITEM NO. 4 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05861 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2008-05301A (DEV2016-00016 & DEV2016-00017) Location: Parcel A: 1085 South Harbor Boulevard Parcel B: 523 West Victor Street Request: Parcel A: to amend a previously-approved conditional use permit to allow an increase in the number of beds and expand an existing clinical research facility. Parcel B: to permit an off-site parking lot to accommodate the expansion of the clinical research facility. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho wcarvalho@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2016-05893 (DEV2016-00113) Location: 5635 East La Palma Avenue Request: To permit a new wall-mounted electronic readerboard sign for an existing movie theater (Cinema City). Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 11 (Accessory Structures) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Nick Taylor njtaylor@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, January 23, 2017 at 5:00 p.m. 01-09-2017 Page 7 of 7 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 1:00 p.m. January 4, 2017 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1A PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 9, 2017 SUBJECT: TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2016-140 LOCATION: 123 North Rio Vista Street RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, approve the attached resolution to correct an error pertaining to the assigned tentative parcel map number. DISCUSSION: On September 19, 2016, the Planning Commission approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-017 to subdivide one parcel into two single family residential lots in conjunction with a Reclassification of the subject property from the “T” Transition Zone to the “RS-2” Single Family Residential Zone. The tentative parcel map number referred to in the public notice, staff report and Resolution No. 2016-083 was Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-017; however, this number was incorrect and should be replaced by the correct parcel map number which is Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-140. The attached Nunc Pro Tunc resolution reflects this change. All other aspects of the original resolution, including the conditions of approval, remain unchanged. Prepared by, Submitted by, Wayne Carvalho Jonathan E. Borrego Contract Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Draft Nunc Pro Tunc Resolution 2. Previously approved Resolution PC2016-083 3. Letter of Request TS.F.R. RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RM-2CONDOMINIUMS26 DU RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE TRIO VISTAELEMENTARY SCHOOL RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-3SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-3SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-3SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLEFAMILYRESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE N R I O V I S T A S T S R I O V I S T A S T E DUTCH AVE S B E T H C I R E MARDI GRAS AVE N C A R O U S E L S T S C O N N I E C I R S C A R O U S E L S T S R O Y A L P L N R O Y A L P L N P L A N T A T I O N P L E CARNIVAL AVE E DUTCH AVE E CINNAMON PL E . L A PA L M A A V E E. LINCOLN AVE E. SOUTH ST S . R I O V I S T A S T N .S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D N . B L U E G U M S T N . S U N K I S T S T 123 North Rio Vista Street DEV No. 2016-00054 Subject Property APN: 268-283-41 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:June 2015 N R I O V I S T A S T S R I O V I S T A S T E DUTCH AVE S B E T H C I R E MARDI GRAS AVE N C A R O U S E L S T S C O N N I E C I R S C A R O U S E L S T S R O Y A L P L N R O Y A L P L S P L A N T A T I O N P L N P L A N T A T I O N P L E CARNIVAL AVE E DUTCH AVE E CINNAMON PL E CINNAMON PL E . L A PA L M A A V E E. LINCOLN AVE E. SOUTH ST S . R I O V I S T A S T N .S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D N . B L U E G U M S T N . S U N K I S T S T 123 North Rio Vista Street DEV No. 2016-00054 Subject Property APN: 268-283-41 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:June 2015 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2017-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING ITS RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-083, NUNC PRO TUNC, TO CORRECT A CLERICAL ERROR IN SAID RESOLUTION (DEV2016-00054) (123 NORTH RIO VISTA STREET) WHEREAS, on September 19, 2016, by the adoption of its Resolution No. PC2016-083, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-017 to establish a 2-lot residential subdivision for that certain real property located at 123 North Rio Vista Street, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-017 was considered and approved by the Planning Commission in conjunction with the application for Reclassification No. 2016-00298, which was a request to rezone or reclassify the Property from the "T" Transition Zone to the "RS-2" Single-Family Residential Zone (herein referred to as "Reclassification No. 2016- 00298"); and WHEREAS, on September 19, 2016, by the adoption of its Resolution No. PC2016-082, the Planning Commission approved Reclassification No. 2016-00298 and recommended that the City Council of the City of Anaheim (the "City Council") adopt an ordinance reclassifying the Property in accordance with Reclassification No. 2016-00298. In response to the recommendation of the Planning Commission, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6385 on October 25, 2016, which had the effect of amending the Zoning Map referred to in Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code to rezone and reclassify the Property into the "RS-2" Single-Family Residential Zone, which became effective on November 24, 2016; and WHEREAS, subsequent to the adoption of Resolution No. PC2016-083, it has been discovered that the applicant submitted an incorrect parcel map number when it applied to the City for approval of a tentative parcel map for the Property. The County Surveyor issued the applicant Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-140; however, the applicant made a clerical error when submitting its application to the City for approval of a tentative parcel map by representing that the number that was assigned by the County Surveyor was Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-017, not Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-140; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission now desires and intends to amend its Resolution No. PC2016-083, nunc pro tunc; that is, to now correct said clerical error that, upon adoption of this Resolution, will have the same legal force and effect as if made at the time when it should have been made, i.e., upon the adoption of Resolution No. PC2016-083 on September 19, 2016; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission has inherent authority to amend its resolutions under these circumstances, which will have retroactive legal effect upon the adoption of this Resolution. - 2 - PC2017-*** NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim as follows: 1. To cure the clerical error made in the assignment of an incorrect number to Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-017, all references contained in Resolution No. PC2016-083 to "Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-017" shall be to "Tentative Parcel Map No. 2016-140", nunc pro tunc; that is, having retroactive legal effect as of the adoption of Resolution No. PC2016-083 on September 19, 2016. 2. Except as expressly amended herein, the provisions of Resolution No. PC2016- 083 shall remain in full force and effect. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of January 9, 2017. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on January 9, 2017, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of January, 2017. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 3 - PC2017-*** AT T A C H M E N T NO . 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 1B PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 9, 2017 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05678 – SIX MONTH COMPLIANCE REVIEW LOCATION: 1256 North Magnolia Avenue (OCRV Storage, Inc.) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Mark Loxsom with OCRV Storage, Inc. The property owner is AVG Partners, represented by Peter A. Gilbert. REQUEST: The applicant requests a six month compliance review of a conditional use permit to permit and retain an indoor/outdoor storage facility that includes the following uses: a temporary modular office trailer, indoor and outdoor storage of recreational and commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, miscellaneous equipment, and auto repair services. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by motion, receive and file the six month review of Conditional Use Permit No. 2013- 05678. BACKGROUND: This 11.75-acre property consists of two parcels under common ownership. The northerly parcel (Parcel 1) is 9.63 acres and consists of a 170,000 square foot building, with Wickes Furniture operating in 70,000 square feet and OCRV occupying the remaining 100,000 square feet for use as indoor storage, accessory retail and accessory vehicle repair. The outdoor area includes vehicle and equipment storage, vehicle valet (drop off) area, and a modular office trailer. Parcel 2 is 2.12 acres and developed with a 38,500 square foot building used by OCRV for additional indoor storage with a portion being sublet for auto repair. Parcel 2 is also used for outdoor storage of commercial vehicles and equipment by OCRV. The property is located in the "I" Industrial zone. The General Plan designates Parcel 1 for General Commercial land uses and Parcel 2 for Industrial land uses. In 2013, the applicant began operating the vehicle and equipment storage on a portion of the site. At that time, the business owner was informed of the need to apply for a conditional use permit to retain the business and a Code Enforcement case remained active until such time a Planning Commission decision was rendered. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05678 January 9, 2017 Page 2 of 3 On April 18, 2016, the Planning Commission approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2013-05678 permitting a temporary modular office trailer and indoor and outdoor storage of recreational and commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, miscellaneous equipment, and auto repair services. Condition No. 17 of Resolution 2016-031 (attached), requires a six month review of the conditional use permit by the Planning Commission as a “Reports and Recommendations” (R&R) item to determine if the storage facility is operating safely and in compliance with all conditions of approval. The six month review is largely required as a result of the property’s recent state of disrepair. Specifically, the six month review is intended to ensure that unpermitted improvements are brought up to code and that certain aesthetic improvements, including the replacement of parking lot landscaping, are completed in a timely manner. AERIAL MAP PROPOSAL: Pursuant to the conditions of approval for this conditional use permit, the permitting of the recreational vehicle storage is subject to a six-month review to ensure on-going compliance with all conditions of approval and to ensure that the storage use is being operated in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding properties. This six month review was conducted to monitor progress made toward compliance with all conditions. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2013-05678 January 9, 2017 Page 3 of 3 Since the Planning Commission approval on April 18, 2016, Planning and Code Enforcement staff has conducted four site inspections to monitor progress, including one inspection with Building and Safety and Fire staff. Generally, the applicant has made significant progress toward compliance with all conditions, as evidenced in the photos attached to this report. Specifically, the applicant has complied with condition numbers 8, 10-13, and 15, relating to cessation of outdoor auto repair, removal of inoperable vehicles, planting of 24-inch box trees adjacent to the I-5 freeway on-ramp along the north property line, removal of on-site debris, repair of damaged lighting, demolition of planters, stacking of firewood, and relocation of the modular office building. However, the applicant did have a disagreement with Building and Safety staff regarding Condition No. 2, which requires the applicant to submit plans for a Building Code analysis to ensure that any prior modifications made to the building were Code compliant and safe. Because of this disagreement, staff opted to delay the six-month Planning Commission review (which should have been scheduled in October 2016) to allow staff to seek a solution with the applicant. Following additional discussions with Building and Safety staff, the applicant has recently made significant progress toward the Building plan submittal. Building and Safety staff have indicated that the applicant is close to a complete submittal and that the major Building Code interpretation issues have been largely resolved. CONCLUSION: The permitting of the a modular office trailer, indoor and outdoor storage of recreational and commercial vehicles, automobiles, trucks, trailers, miscellaneous equipment, and auto repair services has not created a nuisance to existing businesses in the area, nor has it adversely impacted the surrounding properties. Staff has found the operation of the storage facility to be substantially in compliance with the conditions of approval, except Condition No. 2, and recommends the Planning Commission receive and file this six month review, allowing staff to continue to monitor the applicant’s progress toward complete compliance. Should the applicant fail to receive the necessary permits within the next six months, staff intends to schedule the application for consideration of possible revocation by the Planning Commission. Prepared by, Submitted by, Nick Taylor Jonathan E. Borrego Associate Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Planning Commission Resolution 2. Approved Plans 3. Site Inspection Photographs RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SFR RS-2SFR R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E IWICKES FURNITURE IDELPHI BASEBALL FIELD INORTHGATEDISTRIBUTIONCENTER IINDUSTRIALIMEDICAL OFFICE IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IOFFICES IVOCATIONALSCHOOL IBUSINESS PARK 5 FREEWAY N M A G N O L I A A V E W HOUSTON AVE N A V O N D A L E A V E W. LA PALMA AVE N . M A G N O L I A A V E N . D A L E A V E . ORANGETHORPE AVE 1256 North Magnolia Avenue DEV No. 2013-00072 Subject Property APN: 071-062-01071-062-03 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 5 FREEWAY N M A G N O L I A A V E W HOUSTON AVE N A V O N D A L E A V E W. LA PALMA AVE N . M A G N O L I A A V E N . D A L E A V E . ORANGETHORPE AVE 1256 North Magnolia Avenue DEV No. 2013-00072 Subject Property APN: 071-062-01071-062-03 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 AT T A C H M E N T NO . 1 320.0' 320.0' 1 2 0 . 0 ' TILT UP C O N C 352.67' 872.16' CONC. RAMP 3 9 3 . 0 ' MAGNOLIA AVENUE SA N T A A N A F R E E W A Y & R A I L R O A D F . H . 4 2 4 . 9 5 ' 6 ( 6 ( 2 3 7 . 5 7 ' 1 : 6 ( 1 ( 9 9 9 8 EXITEXIT EXIT EXIT EXIT EXIT EXIT EXIT EXIT EXIT 4 Existing planter (typ.) Existing wall 1 1 2 1 PIVS 9 CONC TILT UP BLDG 38,500 SF.FT. 38,000 SQ. FT. VEHICLE STORAGE 400 SQ. FT. VEHICLE SERVICE 100 SQ. FT. RESTROOM/ UTILITIES 8 Existing sign Existing sign 175' 4 4 4 4 7 7 9 7 9 7 9 5 9 1 9 Existing wall 8 4 9 9 3 8 3 5 5 8 4 14 5 55 8 8 8813 10 4 12 10 15 6 10 10 10 10 ENCLOSED TURNEL 6 4 4 4 4 10 6 10 4 0 0 . 0 ' 6 6 8 8108 14 425' 9 EXIT 11 10 1 10 2 1 2 1014 CONC TILT UP BLDG 170,000 SF.FT. 165,000 SQ. FT. VEHICLE STORAGE 1,000 SQ. FT. OFFICE 1,600 SQ. FT. VEHICLE SERVICE 2,000 SQ. RETAIL/ RETAIL INVENTORY 400 SQ. FT. RESTROOM/ UTILITIES F . H . 7 13 Planting of new screening trees along North SURSHUW\OLQHEHWZHHQH[LVWLQJWUHHV´ER[ Tristania conferta (Brisbane box) trees will be SODQWHGDWDPD[LPXPRI¶RQFHQWHU A0.1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN SITE PLAN KEYED NOTES NOTE: ALL SITE CONDITIONS SHOWN ARE EXISTING TO REMAIN EXCEPT THOSE NOTED IN THE KEYED NOTES BELOW. MARK DESCRIPTION OF WORK DETAIL 8' PICKET FENCE 20' ROLLING GATE x 8' HIGH KEYPAD ACCESS WITH FIRE DEPT. OVER RIDE NO LEFT TURN SIGN VEHICLE DROP OFF / PICK UP AREA SITE PLAN KEYED NOTES 8' EXISTING CHAIN LINK FENCE W/ BARBED WIRE VEHICLE STORAGE YARD COMMERCIAL VEHICLE STAGING / VEHICLE STORE AREA PROPOSED SITE PLAN1 CUSTOMER , TENANT EMPLOYER VEHICLE PARKING PC2 NOTES: 1.TOTAL PARKING = 38 STALLS INCLUDING 1 HANDICAP AND 1 VAN HANDICAP. STRIPING WILL MEET CITY OF ANAHEIM PARKING STANDARDS . DETAILS 470 AND 436G VEHICLE CIRCULATION TO MEET FIRE DEPT. STANDARDS PROPERTY GENERAL NOTES: 1. NO PUBLIC OR PRIVATE STREET IMPROVEMENTS INCLUDED. 2. THERE ARE NO CHANGES TO THE EXISTING PROPERTY OR BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS. THE PROPERTY IS APPROXIMATELY 12 ACRES AND THE EXISTING STRUCTURES ON THE PROPERTY HAVE A TOTAL GROSS FLOOR AREA OF APPROXIMATELY 208,500 GROSS SQUARE FEET. EXISTING CONSTRUCTION IS CONCRETE TILT-UP EXTERIOR WALLS AND WOOD FRAMED ROOF STRUCTURE, FULL FIRE SPRINKLER PROTECTED. 3. ORIGINAL SETBACKS UNKNOWN; NO ADDITIONS TO EXISTING STRUCTURES INCLUDED, ALL YARDS REMAIN AS-IS. 4. NO CHANGES TO THE EXISTING PAVED AREAS; UTILITIES OR SIGNAGE. 5. NO CHANGES IN PEDESTRIAN OR VEHICLE ACCESS OR CIRCULATION. 6. NO CHANGES TO FIRE HYDRANTS OR THE STRUCTURES THEY SERVE. 7. NO CHANGES IN THE UTILITIES PROVIDING SERVICE TO THE EXISTING PROPERTY OR STRUCTURES. 8. EXISTING WATER METERS AND BACKFLOW DEVICES ARE LOCATED IN GROUND BOXES OR VAULTS; ELECTRICAL TRANSFORMERS ARE LOCATED IN PAVED AREAS IN EAST (REAR) YARD; NO SCREENING REQUIRED FOR THESE EXISTING UTILITY STRUCTURES. 9. EXISTING LANDSCAPE AREAS WILL BE CLEARED,PRUNED AND KEPT IN A WELL MAINTAINED CONDITION. NO NEW LANDSCAPING OR PLANTINGS WILL BE ADDED LEGAL DESCRIPTION: THAT PORTION OF THE SOUTHWESTQUARTER OF SECTION 6, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, IN , THE RANCHO LOS COYOTES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF SAID COUNTY, DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS: '/EE/E'dWK/Ed/Ed,t^d>/EK&^/^d/KEϲ͕/^dEdd,ZKEEKZd,ϬͲϯϵΖͲϬϬ͟t^d͕ϭϬϲϬ͘ϰϱ FEET FROM THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN PARCEL 2 OF THE LAND CONVEYED TO THE EMERSON ELECTRIC MANUFACTURING COMPANY, A MISSOURI CORPORATION BY DEED RECORDED JULY 31, 1962 IN KK<ϲϭϵϳ͕W'ϳϲK&K&&//>ZKZ^͕ZKZ^K&^/KhEdz͕d,EKEd/Eh/E'EKZd,ϬͲϯϵΖͲϬϬ͟t^d ALONG SAID WESTERLY LINE, 192.48 FEET TO THE SOUTHWEST CORNER OF THE LAND DESCRIBED IN THE DEED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, RECORDED APRIL 19, 1955 IN BOOK 3034, PAGE 414 OF SAID OFFICIAL RECORDS, THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID LAND CONVEYED TO THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, THE FOLLOWING COURSES AND /^dE^͗EKZd,ϴϵͲϮϭΖͲϬϬ͟^d͕ϯϬ͘ϬϬ&d͖EKZd,ϲͲϮϴΖͲϯϬ͟^d͕ϮϬϭ͘ϱϲ&d͕EEKZd,ϱͲϭϬΖͲϯϰ͟^d͕ 495.10 FEET TO A POINT IN THE SOUTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE 100.00 FOOT RIGHT OF WAY OF THE SOUTHERN PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, DESCRIBED IN THE FIRST PARCEL OF DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 44 PAGE 495 OF DEEDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY; THENCE ALONG SAID SOUTHWESTERLY LINE, SOUTH ϱϳͲϭϬΖͲϯϱ͟^d͕ϰϮϰ͘ϵϱ&dE^Khd,ϱϳͲϭϯΖͲϯϬ͟^d͕Ϯϯϳ͘ϱϳ&ddK>/EWZ>>>t/d,E/^dEd EASTERLY, 658.00 FEET, MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF SAID SECTION 6, BEING THE NORTHEASTERLY CORNER OF PARCEL NO. 1 AS SHOWN ON A MAP FILED IN BOOK 43, PAGE 27 OF PARCEL MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE ALONG THE BOUNDARY OF SAID PARCEL EK͘ϭ^Khd,ϬͲϯϵΖͲϬϬ͟^d͕ϴϳϮ͘ϭϱ&d͕^Khd,ϴϵͲϭϳΖͲϭϱ͟t^d͕Ϯϲϱ͘ϬϬ&d͕EEKZd,ϬͲϯϵΖͲϬϬ͟t^d͕ϯϱϮ͘ϲϳ FEET TO AN ANGLE POINT THEREIN; THENCE, CONTINUING ALONG SAID BOUNDARY AND THE WESTERLY WZK>KE'd/KEd,ZK&^Khd,ϴϵͲϮϭΖͲϬϬ͟t^dϯϵϯ͘ϬϬ&ddKd,WK/Ed'/EE/E'͘ EXCEPTIONS: 5. ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 12, 1968 IN BOOK 8491, PAGE 339, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 6. 5' WIDE PUBLIC UTILITIES EASEMENT RECORDED APRIL 26, 1972 IN BOOK 10099, PAGE 759, OFFICIAL RECORDS. 13. 7 PARCEL STATE HIGHWAY EASEMENT RECORDED JANUARY 25, 1999 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 19990051566, OFFICIAL RECORDS. EXIT PATH 1.NORTHERN PARCEL: 9.63 ACRES 1256 N. Magnolia Avenue ( APN 071-062-01) 2.SOUTHERN PARCEL: 2.12 ACRES 1256 N. Magnolia Avenue ( APN 071-062-03) TRASH ENCLOSURE IF REQUIRE FOR OPERATION 40 YD TRASH BIN SPECIAL PAVEMENT MEMBRANE EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL STORAGE DELIVERY VEHICLE PARKING/STAGING FIRE WOOD, CUTTING, SPLITTING STORAGE AREA PC2 PC2 ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 3 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: JANUARY 9, 2017 SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006 AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 LOCATION: 200 and 205 West Alro Way and the eastern portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac. APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The project applicant is Padmesh Patel, representing Singod Investors VI, LLC. The applicant owns the property at 200 West Alro Way. The property at 205 West Alro Way and the Alro Way cul-de-sac are owned by the City of Anaheim. The Director of Public Works for the City of Anaheim has given the applicant permission to request entitlements for the City- owned property. REQUEST: The applicant proposes to purchase City-owned property (i.e., the eastern portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac and a former fire station site) and consolidate it with the applicant’s property to construct a five-story, 174-room hotel. The applicant is requesting Planning Commission approval of the Final Site Plan for the hotel with the following Code variances: 1) reduced street landscape setback, 2) reduced interior building and landscape setbacks, 3) an additional wall sign, and 4) fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code. The sale of the City-owned property needed to complete the project, including the eastern portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac, is subject to the approval of the City Council at a future date and contingent upon approval of the Final Site Plan. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that an Addendum to the previously-certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 311 (EIR 311) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 (EIR 340) is the appropriate environmental document for this request, and approving Variance No. 2016-05077, Final Site Plan No. 2016-00006, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2016-00389 under the conditions imposed. BACKGROUND: This 1.94-acre property is comprised of two parcels and the eastern portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac. The northern portion of the site is within the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP). The southern portion of the site is within the Parking District and the C-R Overlay of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP). The property is designated by the General Plan for Commercial-Recreation land uses. VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 January 9, 2017 Page 2 of 7 The parcel north of Alro Way is the site of a former City fire station that existed until the Interstate 5 Freeway (I-5) was widened. The fire station was subsequently relocated to Clementine Street to the southwest. The former fire station property is now a vacant site with limited value as a standalone development site due to its small size. The parcel south of Alro Way is improved with a vacant two-story commercial building (formerly Bergstroms Childrens Store) and an electronic readerboard sign which would be demolished as part of this project. The project site is bordered by the I-5 Freeway to the north and south; the newly constructed Country Inn and Suites Hotel on the south and west; and the United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) office to the west, across Clementine Street. Alro Way VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 January 9, 2017 Page 3 of 7 PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to purchase the former fire station site (205 West Alro Way) and the eastern portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac, and consolidate them with the applicant’s property to construct a five-story, 174-room hotel. The applicant’s acquisition of the City-owned properties is subject to a determination to be made by the City Council, separate and apart from the entitlements described in this report. As such, the entitlements to be approved by the Planning Commission are subject to and contingent upon the City Council’s approval of the conveyance of the City-owned properties to the applicant and the abandonment of a portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac and street closure described below. The hotel is proposed at the south end of the property. The five-story building would be built at a maximum height of 74 feet, including all architectural projections. The architectural style is contemporary, emphasizing key areas of the building with vertical elements and projections. The predominant exterior finish is smooth stucco with lightly tinted green glazed windows and feature wall. Aluminum mullions and metal panels accentuate the building’s windows and architectural projections. The hotel rooms would be a mixture of studios and suites. Guest amenities would include a breakfast room, in which breakfast would be included in the price of room, fitness room, small gift shop, and pool deck with barbeques and lounge chairs. Proposed landscaping includes canopy and vertical tree species, as well as a variety of shrubs and groundcovers. A total of 132 parking spaces would be provided in a surface parking lot to the north of the hotel and one-level of subterranean parking. View of project from the I-5 Freeway Vehicle access to the site would be provided via the existing four-way stop sign controlled intersection of Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street, which currently exists as the Alro Way cul-de-sac. The easterly portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac is proposed to be abandoned and incorporated into the project site. The applicant has requested such abandonment, the approval of which is subject to a determination to be made by the City Council separate and apart from the entitlements described in this report to be considered by the Planning Commission. The westerly portion of Alro Way, from the intersection to the project boundary, would be subject to a street closure, which will also be subject to a determination to be made separately by the City Council. VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 January 9, 2017 Page 4 of 7 As part of the project, the remaining western portion of the Alro Way right-of-way would be narrowed to have the appearance of a typical commercial drive approach. The driveway would lead to a parking gate and provide access to surface parking, the guest drop-off area with direct access to the hotel lobby, and the ramp leading to the subterranean parking level, at the southeast corner of the site. Pedestrian access to Clementine Street/Manchester Avenue from the hotel would be via a sidewalk on the south side of the reconfigured Alro Way/driveway. The ARSP does not anticipate or require a sidewalk on the east side of Manchester Avenue, north of Alro Way; and, therefore, no sidewalk is proposed on the north side of the driveway or adjacent to Manchester Avenue. Sidewalks are required, and currently exist, on the west side of Manchester Avenue, north of Alro Way, in front of the USCIS, and on Clementine Street, south of Alro Way. The public parkway, adjacent to Manchester Avenue, north of Alro Way, would be 12 feet wide and planted with alternating Mexican Fan Palms and small canopy trees. Layered landscaping is proposed in the front setback between the public parkway and parking lot. Groupings of various canopy trees are proposed along the property line abutting the I-5 Freeway. FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Following is staff’s analysis and recommendation for each requested action: Street Setback, Interior Setback, and Sign Variances: A variance shall be granted upon a finding by the Planning Commission or City Council that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other properties under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; 2) That, because of special circumstances, shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Street Setback: The ARSP requires a 20-foot wide setback along Manchester Avenue; however, only an approximately 200 foot portion of the project site north of Alro Way (the site of the former fire station) fronts onto Manchester Avenue. The project includes street setbacks that vary in depth in this area due to the narrow and irregular shape of the former fire station site; and to accommodate the required vehicle back up clearance of the open parking spaces proposed in this area. There is justification for the variance since the site has a unique triangular shape that narrows significantly at the north end. To mitigate the reduced setback, the applicant proposes a layered landscape to effectively screen the parking area from the street and provide the size and quantity of trees based on the tree density requirements of the full 20-foot setback. Additionally, since a sidewalk is not required to be provided along this portion of the street, the twelve-foot wide public right-of-way will be fully landscaped and would be contiguous with the private property landscaping, giving the appearance of a much wider setback. Due to the unusual shape and narrow width of the property, combined with a landscape design that would achieve a similar effect as the full setback, staff is supportive of the setback variance. Interior Setback: A minimum 10-foot wide landscaped setback is required adjacent to interior property lines. The project complies with this requirement throughout the project, with the VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 January 9, 2017 Page 5 of 7 exception of the west interior property line adjacent to the Country Inn & Suites hotel. With the exception of three, one- to two-foot wide architectural projections that are proposed on the upper floors of the building, the hotel would meet the 10-foot wide setback requirement in this area; however, the setback would not be fully landscaped as required by code. Along this edge, the subterranean parking level encroaches seven feet into the setback, such that at-grade planting within the setback is not feasible. In lieu of the required 10-foot wide landscaped area, the applicant proposes a four-foot wide, 30-inch high raised planter adjacent to the hotel building, a four-foot wide walkway and a two-foot wide planting strip to allow for the planting of vines along the inside of an existing perimeter block wall. Although 10 feet of landscaping would not be provided, the tree density requirements that would otherwise be required for the full ten-foot wide area would be provided within the raised planter. Therefore, while the 10-foot wide setback will not be completely landscaped, the required density of trees in this area will be met. In addition, this edge of the property is adjacent to the parking lot of the adjacent Country Inn & Suites hotel, which is also heavily planted with canopy trees. As described above, the property is irregularly-shaped which significantly impacts the ability to build a viable hotel while meeting all code requirements, including parking and setbacks. Although the hotel building is proposed to be situated along the widest portion of the property, that part of the property has a varying depth between approximately 310 feet at its widest point down to approximately 150 feet at its narrowest point. This significant variation in depth poses significant design challenges. Due to the unusual shape of the property, staff believes that the findings for a variance have been met. Signs: The Code allows two walls signs for hotels at a mid-block location and requires that they be located on non-adjacent walls. Typically, for a rectangular shaped property, this would result in signs on either side of a building that would be visible from vehicles approaching the building from either direction. Due to the special circumstances of the project site, the applicant requests a total of three walls signs, one each on the north, south and east elevations. The project site has a unique configuration in that it is generally triangular in shape. In addition, the portion of the site that would include the building is set back a substantial distance from Clementine Street and Disney Way and is separated from both streets by the adjacent Country Inn and Suites and its parking lot. The third “street frontage” for the site is the I-5 freeway. Any sign proposed on the south elevation would not be visible from both Clementine Street and the I-5 Freeway. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a third sign on the east elevation to gain visibility from the adjacent freeway. A similar variance was approved in 2007 for an office building at the north end of The Anaheim Resort, which had similar characteristics with frontages on both Manchester Avenue and the I-5 Freeway. Because of the unique configuration of the property and being blocked by a similar sized building to the south, staff believes that the findings for a variance have been met to support the additional sign. Parking Administrative Adjustment: An administrative adjustment shall be granted upon a finding by the Planning Commission or City Council that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use; VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 January 9, 2017 Page 6 of 7 2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; and 5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The proposed project requires 144 parking spaces and 132 spaces are proposed, a deviation of less than 10% of the Code requirement. Typically, a deviation of less than 10% of Code required parking would be reviewed administratively by staff. However, when proposed as part of a project requiring a public hearing, the request is combined with the other entitlements for consideration by the Commission. Staff is supportive of this minor deviation from the number of parking spaces required by the Zoning Code since the project would be providing over 91% of the required parking spaces and the property is located in close proximity to the major Anaheim Resort destinations such as the Disney theme parks and Anaheim GardenWalk. Many guests staying at the hotel would arrive by taxi, shuttles, or ride share vehicles, rather than arriving by personal vehicle. Final Site Plan: The applicant requests approval of a final site plan to construct the proposed hotel development. Before the Planning Commission may approve the final plans, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The design and layout of the proposed development are consistent with the General Plan, any applicable specific plan, the development standards of the applicable zoning district, and any special area guidelines or policies; 2) The design and layout of the proposed development will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards; 3) The architectural design of the proposed development is compatible with the character of the surrounding neighborhood; 4) The design of the proposed development will provide a desirable environment for its occupants, visiting public, and its neighbors, through the appropriate use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing and be appropriately maintained; and 5) The proposed development will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity. VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 January 9, 2017 Page 7 of 7 The ARSP and DRSP require approval of a final site plan for hotels to ensure that the proposed design is appropriate for the site, compatible with surrounding land uses and in compliance with specific plan requirements. Staff has reviewed the proposal and has determined that, with the exception of the requested variances pertaining to street and interior setbacks, signs and parking, the project complies with all applicable provisions of the ARSP and DRSP. The proposed hotel project is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan and specific plans. Additionally, Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340 includes certain measures to be complied with prior to approval of the Final Site Plan; these measures have been complied with as part of the review process. Staff recommends approval of the proposed final site plan. CEQA Environmental Determination: An Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 has been prepared to evaluate the potential environmental effects of the proposed project. As previously stated, the proposed project falls within two specific plans, the ARSP and the DRSP. EIR 311 was certified in June 1993 for the DRSP. EIR 340 was certified in December 2012 for the ARSP. EIR 340, was a supplemental EIR to EIR 313, which was certified in conjunction with the original approval of the ARSP in September 1994. In addition to superseding the original analysis completed by EIR 313, EIR 340 also analyzed build-out of the entire Anaheim Resort, including properties within the DRSP. The Addendum analyzed whether the environmental effects from the proposed project would be any different from those disclosed by EIR 311 and 340 for the implementation of the DRSP and ARSP respectively. The Addendum specifically analyzed the potential impacts on areas such as traffic, lighting, noise, and air quality. The Addendum concluded that the proposed project would not result in any environmental impacts beyond those that are analyzed and addressed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. A Mitigation Monitoring Plan (MMP) specific to this project, comprised of mitigation measures from EIR 311 and EIR 340, is included in the Addendum. These required mitigation measures are also included as conditions of approval within the attached resolution. CONCLUSION: The proposed hotel project is consistent with the goals and policies of the ARSP and DRSP intended to supply visitor serving uses and establish a unified Resort identity. The requested variances are justified due to the irregular shape of the property and the proposed project would be an appropriate addition to the Anaheim Resort. The proposed hotel represents a significant positive investment in area and would utilize the vacant remnant parcel to its highest and best use. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested final site plan, variance and administrative adjustment. Prepared by, Submitted by, Elaine Thienprasiddhi Jonathan E. Borrego Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Development Summary 2. Draft Resolution 3. Letter of Request 4. Variance Justification Letter 5. Parking Justification Letter 6. Final Site Plan Memorandum 7. Development Plans and Photos 8. Addendum and MMP No. 340 SP 92-1BERGSTROMS CHILDRENS STORE SP 92-1DA3ASOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON CO. EASEMENT C-G (SABC)VACANT SP 92-2DA1SYBRON DENTAL SPECIATIES C-G (SABC)ANAHEIM BUSINESS PARK SP 92-1DA3ARETAIL SP 92-1DA3ABERGSTROMS CHILDRENS STORE SP 92-1DA3AINDUSTRIAL SP 92-1DA3ASOUTHERN CALIFORNIAEDISON CO. EASEMENT SP 92-1DA3APARKING LOT SP 92-2DA1SYBRON DENTAL SPECIATIES 5 FREEW AY 5 FREEWAY S C L E M E N T I N E S T S M ANCHESTER AVE W DISNEY WAY W DISNEY WAY W C E R R I T O S A V E W ALRO WAY W. BALL RD E. BALL RD S . L E W I S S T S . H A R B O R B L V D S . W A L N U T S T W. KATELLA AVE E. KATELLA AVE S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E. GENE AUTRY WAY S . H A S T E R S T S .D I S N E Y L A N D D R 200 and 205 West Alro Way DEV No. 2016-00055 Subject Property APN: 082-212-04082-213-10 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:June 2015 5 FREEW AY 5 FREEWAY S C L E M E N T I N E S T S M ANCHESTER AVE W DISNEY WAY W DISNEY WAY W C E R R I T O S A V E W ALRO WAY W. BALL RD E. BALL RD S . L E W I S S T S . H A R B O R B L V D S . W A L N U T S T W. KATELLA AVE E. KATELLA AVE S . A N A H E I M B L V D S . S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E. GENE AUTRY WAY S . H A S T E R S T S .D I S N E Y L A N D D R 200 and 205 West Alro Way DEV No. 2016-00055 Subject Property APN: 082-212-04082-213-10 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:June 2015 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY Development Standard Proposed Project ARSP Standards Site Area 1.94 acres --- Density 174 rooms, plus the retail equivalent of one room (600 sf of accessory retail area equals one room) 175 rooms maximum Street Setbacks Manchester Avenue Three to 20 feet1 20 feet minimum Front Setback Tree Density2 Manchester Avenue 1,725 points 1,286 points minimum Interior Setback Tree Density Freeway South West 3,625 points 2,500 points 850 points 3,205 points minimum 1,645 points minimum 745 points minimum Building Height 74 feet 136 feet Parking 132 spaces1 144 spaces 1 A variance and administrative adjustment are requested by the applicant to deviate from these standards. 2 Tree density is calculated by multiplying the size (in square feet) of the landscape area and by a Tree Density Factor (0.3 at this location) to determine a minimum point value. Trees proposed in the landscape area are assigned a point value based on their size at installation. [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 -1- PC2017-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2017-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THAT AN ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY-CERTIFIED FINAL SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 340 FOR AMENDMENT NO. 14 TO THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN AND FINAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 311 FOR THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016- 00006 AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2016-00055) (200 AND 205 WEST ALRO WAY) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Variance No. 2016-05077, Final Site Plan No. 2016-00006 and Administrative Adjustment No. 2016-00389 to permit the construction of a 174-room, five-story hotel with one level of subterranean parking with street and interior landscape setbacks that are narrower than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"), more wall signs than are permitted by the Code, and fewer parking spaces than required by the Code (collectively referred to herein as the "Proposed Project") for certain real property located at 200 and 205 West Alro Way in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 1.94 acres, is developed with a two-story commercial building, includes a portion of Alro Way and a vacant parcel. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Commercial Recreation land uses. The northerly portion of the Property is located within the boundaries of the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) of the the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area and is subject to the zoning and development standards set forth in Section 18.116.060 (Development Density Areas – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) and Section 18.116.070 (Uses – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); the southerly portion of the Property is located within the boundaries of the Parking District (Development Areas 3A and 3B) and the C-R Overlay of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (SP 92-1) Zone (the "DRSP"). The DRSP permits the Property to be developed as parking facilities or, alternatively, for the uses set forth in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone ("ARSP") if the Property is not to be developed as part of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. Because the Proposed Project consists of a hotel and related facilities, the Property and the Proposed Project are subject to development in accordance with the zoning and development standards of the C-R Overlay, which permits the uses set forth in the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1) of the ARSP, identified in Section 18.116.070 (Uses – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Code. Therefore, the Proposed Project is subject to the limitations prescribed in Section 18.114.050 (Land Use and Site Development Standards – -2- PC2017-*** General) and subsection .060 (C-R Overlay Density) of Section 18.114.100 (C-R Overlay) of the DRSP and subsection .070 (Permitted Uses and Structures – General) of Section 18.116.070 (Uses – Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) of the ARSP; and WHEREAS, on June 29, 1993, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5377 for the purpose of amending the zoning map to reclassify certain real property described therein into the DRSP subject to certain conditions as specified therein. The City Council concurrently adopted Ordinance No. 5378 for the purpose of establishing zoning and development standards for the DRSP in the form of what was then known as Chapter 18.78 of the Code and is now known as Chapter 18.114 (Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (SP 92-1) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Code; and WHEREAS, in support of the adoption of the DRSP, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 311 (“FEIR No. 311”) by the adoption on June 22, 1993 of its Resolution No. 93R-107; and WHEREAS, on September 20, 1994, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to provide a long-range comprehensive plan for future development of approximately 549.5 acres surrounding The Disneyland Resort and Hotel Circle. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan includes zoning and development standards, design guidelines, a streetscape program, and a public facilities plan, intended to maximize the area’s potential, guide future development, and ensure a balance between growth and infrastructure. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan permits the development of hotel, convention, retail, and other visitor-serving uses, as well as the infrastructure improvements that are needed to support future development; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5454 for the purpose of amending the zoning map to reclassify certain real property described therein into the ARSP subject to certain conditions as specified therein. The City Council concurrently adopted Ordinance No. 5453 for the purpose of establishing zoning and development standards for the ARSP in the form of what was then known as Chapter 18.48 of the Code and is now known as Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of the Code; and WHEREAS, in support of the adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, the City Council certified Master Environmental Impact Report (“MEIR No. 313”) by the adoption on September 20, 1994 of its Resolution No. 94R-234; and WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 2012-158, the City Council certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008-00340 ("SEIR No. 340"), which reevaluated all of the environmental changes that had occurred in and around the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area since its adoption in 1994 and contained an analysis of the potential environmental impacts of various entitlements and actions referenced therein, including, inter alia, entitlements permitting the maximum build-out of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, including an increase of to 406,359 square feet of convention center space, 180,000 square feet of commercial development, 900 hotel rooms, and, 40,000 square feet of hotel meeting/ballroom space; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January 9, 2017 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed Variance No. 2016-05077, Final Site -3- PC2017-*** Plan No. 2016-00006 and Administrative Adjustment No. 2016-00389 to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, an Addendum to FEIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340, dated December 2016 (herein referred to as the "Addendum"), a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, has been prepared pursuant to the provisions of Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in FEIR No. 311 and/or SEIR No. 340 would result or whether previously identified significant impacts would be substantially more severe in connection with the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in connection with the project proposed under Variance No. 2016-05077, Final Site Plan No. 2016-00006 and Administrative Adjustment No. 2016-00389 and the Planning Commission’s review of the Addendum, the Planning Commission has independently reviewed the Addendum, FEIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340 and has exercised its independent judgment in making the findings and determinations set forth herein; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request to construct a 174-room, five-story hotel with one level of subterranean parking with street and interior landscape setbacks that are narrower than required by the Code, more wall signs than are permitted by the Code, and fewer parking spaces than required by the Code, has determined that Variance No. 2016-05077 should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.114.100.080 Minimum interior setback. (10 feet required; two to 10 feet proposed) 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, location and surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity of the proposed Project. The property is an irregular triangular shape, which presents unique challenges to this site not experienced by others. The Project complies with the setback requirement along the south and west interior property lines; however, -4- PC2017-*** this is not feasible along the west interior property line due to the extent of the subterranean parking. 2. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity due to the limited developable area, specifically the narrow width of portions of the property. SECTION NO. 18.116.090.020 Minimum street setback. (20 feet required; three to 20 feet proposed) 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, location and surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity of the proposed Project. The property is an irregular triangular shape, which presents unique challenges to this site not experienced by others. The northern portion of the site tapers to become extremely narrow, such that the required 20-foot setback would render most of the site unusable. 2. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity due to the limited developable area, specifically the narrow width of portions of the property. SECTION NO. 18.114.130.060.04(a) Wall signs. (two wall signs permitted; three proposed) 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, location and surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity of the proposed Project. The project site has a unique configuration in that it is generally triangular in shape. In addition, the portion of the site that would include the building is set back a substantial distance from Clementine Street and Disney Way and is separated from both streets by the adjacent Country Inn and Suites and its parking lot. The third “street frontage” for the site is the I-5 freeway. 2. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity due to the unique configuration of the property. Any sign proposed on the south elevation would not be visible from both Clementine Street and the I-5 Freeway. Therefore, the applicant is requesting a third sign on the east elevation to gain visibility from the adjacent freeway. A similar variance was approved in 2007 for an office building at the north end of The Anaheim Resort, which had similar characteristics with frontages on both Manchester Avenue and the I-5 Freeway. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for a Final Site Plan should be approved for the following reasons: 1. Subject to compliance with the conditions of approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference, the Final Site Plan, including its design and layout, complies with the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. SP92-1 and Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 and is consistent with the zoning and development standards of said -5- PC2017-*** Specific Plans, as described in Chapters 18.114 and 18.116 of the Code, with the exception of the variance and administrative adjustment request, as described herein. 2. The design and layout of the Proposed Project will not interfere with the use and enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or pedestrian hazards. 3. The architectural design of the Proposed Project is compatible with the character of the surrounding hotels and development located within the land area of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. 4. The design of the Proposed Project will provide a desirable environment for its occupants, the visiting public, and its neighbors, through the appropriate use of materials, texture and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing and be appropriately maintained. 5. The Proposed Project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of the Proposed Project. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Administrative Adjustment No. 2016-00389 should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (144 spaces required; 132 spaces proposed) 1. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off- street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use due to the proximity of the site to the Disneyland Resort and Anaheim Convention Center, making walking and public transportation the preferred choice for many guests; and 2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking within the property will adequately accommodate the parking demands of the hotel. Additionally, on-street parking is not permitted on the adjacent public streets; and 3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the parking demands of the proposed hotel. The nearby parking lots consist of an access controlled Disney owned parking lot and an adjacent hotel which is physically separated from this site by solid perimeter walls; and 4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the property and are designed to allow for adequate on-site circulation; and -6- PC2017-*** 5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are designed to allow adequate on-site circulation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, based upon a thorough review of the Proposed Project, the Addendum to Final EIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340, Final EIR No. 311, SEIR No. 340, and the evidence received to date, does determine as follows: 1. That the Addendum was prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual; 2. That, based upon the evidence submitted and as demonstrated by the analysis included in the Addendum, none of the conditions described in Sections 15162 or 15163 of the State CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental environmental impact report or negative declaration have occurred; specifically; (a) There have not been any substantial changes in the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan or the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan or in any of the entitlements that were analyzed in FEIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340 that require major revisions of FEIR No. 311 and/or SEIR No. 340 because of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (b) There have not been any substantial changes with respect to the circumstances under which the Proposed Project is undertaken that require major revisions of FEIR No. 311 and/or SEIR No. 340 due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; and (c) There is no new information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time FEIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340 were certified as complete and adopted, that shows any of the following: (i) The Proposed Project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in FEIR No. 311 or SEIR No. 340; (ii) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in FEIR No. 311 or SEIR No. 340; (iii) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the Proposed Project, but the proponents of the Proposed Project decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives; or (iv) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in FEIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340 would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the proponents of the Proposed Project decline to adopt the mitigation measures or alternatives. -7- PC2017-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, the Planning Commission determines that FEIR No. 311 and SEIR No. 340, together with the Addendum, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed Project and that, accordingly, the Addendum is hereby approved and adopted. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has reviewed and considered MMP No. 337, which is integrated with the aforementioned conditions of approval and together are represented as Exhibit B hereto, and does hereby approve and adopt MMP No. 340 for the Proposed Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Variance No. 2016-05077, Final Site Plan No. 2016-00006 and Administrative Adjustment No. 2016-00389, contingent upon and subject to (i) the conditions of approval, which are described in Exhibit B, and attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, and (ii) approval by the City Council of the abandonment of a portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac, the closure of another portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac, and the conveyance of City-owned property commonly known as 205 West Alro Way and the abandoned portion of the Alro Way cul-de-sac. Said conditions are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. -8- PC2017-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of January 9, 2017. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on January 9, 2017, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 9th day of January, 2017. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -9- PC2017-*** -10- PC2017-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2016-05077, FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2016-00006 AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2016-00389 (DEV2016-00055) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A DEMOLITION PERMIT 1 MM 5.7-4: Prior to issuance of the first grading or demolition permit, whichever occurs first the property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval by the Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if previously unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material or waste, is discovered onsite. Fire 2 MM 5.3-2: Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning and Building Department, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees/shrubs which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist. Planning and Building 3 MM 5.3-1: Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning and Building Department 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. Planning and Building 4 MM 5.2-4: Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site. Planning and Building 5 MM 5.19-5: Prior to issuance of each grading and demolition permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit to the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager for approval a Construction Waste Management Plan that, at a minimum, specifies that at least 75 percent of non-hazardous construction and demolition Planning and Building -11- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY debris shall be recycled or salvaged and identifies the materials to be diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or co-mingled. PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT 6 MM 5.15-8: Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall be amended to include: a. Construction of a new well with a minimum 1,500 GPM capacity to serve The Anaheim Resort Area (tentative location near Ponderosa Park and Orangewood Avenue); and b. Construction of a new 16-inch water main along Harbor Boulevard from Orangewood to Chapman Avenue. Public Utilities 7 MM 5.12-6: Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to the Fire Department for review and approval to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department service requirements. Fire 8 MM 5.8-1: Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public Works Department, Development Services Division and Orange County (OC) Public Works/OC Engineering. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm; and, b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project- generated drainage and runoff. Public Works 9 MM 5.8-2: Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one (1) acre of soil, the property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division. Public Works 10 MM 5.4-2: Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be Public Works -12- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. 11 MM 5.4-1: Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. Public Works 12 MM 5.14-5: Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) for review and a approval and shall implement ATN recommendations to the extent feasible. Public Works 13 MM 5.16-1: Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future sanitary sewer system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval of the City Engineer to assist in determining the following: a. If the development/redevelopment (1) does not discharge into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) does not increase flows or change points of discharge, then the property owner’s/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program. b. If the development/redevelopment (1) discharges into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) increases flows or changes points of discharge, then the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as recommended by the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public Public Works -13- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspections for the building/structure, whichever comes first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, as determined by the City Engineer, which may include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts for the sanitary sewer system, the property owner/developer shall submit a sanitary sewer system improvement phasing plan for the project to the City Engineer for review and approval which shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system, (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations, (3) construction phasing, and (4) construction estimates. The study shall determine the impact of the project sewer flows for total build out of the project and identify local deficiencies for each project component (i.e., each hotel). 14 MM 5.18-1: Prior to approval of a final subdivision map, or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following: a. If the specific development/redevelopment does not increase or redirect current or historic storm water quantities/flows, then the property owner/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to provide storm drainage facilities in 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency. If the specific development/redevelopment increases or redirects the current or historic storm water quantity/flow, then the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s office of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the storm drainage facilities as recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program as determined by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage system improvement phasing plan for the project shall be submitted by the property owner/developer to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system; (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations; (3) construction phasing; and, Public Works -14- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY (4) construction estimates. ONGOING DURING PROJECT DEMOLITION AND CONSTRUCTION 15 MM 5.7-6: Ongoing during project demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), and according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. Fire 16 MM 5.5-5: Ongoing during grading activities, the property owner/developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division. Planning and Building 17 MM 5.5-6: Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or geologic hazards and provide a note on plans that all grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the applicable geotechnical investigation. Planning and Building PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 18 MM 3.10.7-5 (FEIR No. 311, MMP No. 67): Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development of a facility other than parking in the Future Expansion District, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid its fair share of funding for the following improvements:  The applicable segments of a City sewer replacement or parallel line to an existing 18-inch City sewer line in Orangewood Avenue from the existing 24-inch District trunk sewer line at Ninth Street to a point of west of I-5. This will be necessary for construction of the Future Expansion District or any other developments in the Commercial Recreation Area south of Katella and West of I-5. This mitigation will be readdressed in subsequent environmental review for the Future Expansion District.  A City sewer main replacement or parallel line in Harbor Boulevard from Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue. The City recognizes that these improvements will serve not only the applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, each of which should contribute its allocable share of the cost of these improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall, and shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the applicant's allocable share of the cost. Such arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant; (3) creation of appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts, and/or use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of other such mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of Public Works -15- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY improvement costs attributable to the applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such improvements among property owners/developers, including the applicant, in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, or otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Sewer Impact and Improvement Fee Program for the South Central City Area. Compliance with this Fee Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5490 and Resolution No. 95R-60 dated April 18, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements with the applicant. 19 MM 5.14-3: Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan. Public Works 20 MM 5.14-14: Prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first, security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, completion guarantee, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and drainage facilities and other appurtenant work, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with the specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, as may be modified by the City Engineer. Installation of said improvements shall occur prior to final building and zoning inspections. Public Works 21 MM 5.12-9: Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid their fair share of the funding to accommodate the following, which will serve the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area: a. One additional fire truck company. b. One additional paramedic company. c. Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units, additional manpower, equipment and facilities. d. A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability. e. A medical triage vehicle/trailer, equipped with sufficient trauma dressings, medical supplies, stretchers, etc., to handle 1,000 injured persons, and an appropriate storage facility. The determination of the allocable share of costs attributable to the property owner/developer shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such equipment/facilities among property owners/developers in the Hotel Circle Fire -16- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY Specific Plan Area, the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area or the otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. Note: To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic Services Impact Fee Program. Compliance with this Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5496 and Resolution No. 95R-73 dated May 16, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements. 22 MM 5.12-8: Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including: a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of access roads. b. Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 75,000 pounds. c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required at all entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department. d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of 400 feet apart. e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. Fire 23 MM 5.12-11: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan to the Fire Department for review and approval detailing accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow. Fire 24 MM 5.12-12: Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit, plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as being in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code. Fire 25 MM 5.12-7: Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to the final building and zoning inspection, plans shall indicate that all buildings, exclusive of parking structures, shall have sprinklers installed by the property owner/developer in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed prior to each final building and zoning inspection. Fire 26 MM 5.12-14: Prior to approval of building plans, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence to the satisfaction of the Fire Department that all lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates shall be equipped with “knox box” devices as required and approved by the Fire Department. Fire -17- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY 27 MM 5.10-2: Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise-sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property owner/developer prior to final building and zoning inspections. Planning and Building 28 MM 5.15-3: Prior to issuance of each building permit, water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80 psi or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property owner/developer’s service. Planning and Building 29 MM 5.14-11: Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, in the event that a parcel is subdivided and there is a need for common on-site circulation and/or parking, prior to recordation of a subdivision map, an unsubordinated covenant providing for reciprocal access and/or parking, as appropriate, approved by the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager, shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning and Department. If the reciprocal access is across parcel lines or if public rights of way are required for reciprocal access; Public Works approval shall be required. Planning and Building 30 MM 5.2-7: Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a human health risk assessment (HRA) for any proposed sensitive land uses (according to SCAQMD standards at that time) to be located within 500 feet of the near edge of the I-5 freeway unless it is demonstrated that the health risks have been determined to be acceptable according to the standards of the SCAQMD at the time of building permit application. Planning and Building 31 MM 5.12-19: Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.385, Public Library Facilities Services Areas – Payment of Fees Required. Planning and Building 32 MM 5.2-6: Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce operation-related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not limited to the following: a. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors. b. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances. c. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in building design, such as appropriate passive solar design. d. Use drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used in pumping and transporting water. e. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or participate in a joint development daycare center f. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated that Planning and Building -18- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment current at the time makes this installation infeasible. 33 MM 5.2-5: Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning and Building Department. Planning and Building 34 MM 5.15-4: Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan which shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The irrigation plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system. The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils, that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies, and that surface runoff and overwatering is minimized. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall include water-conserving features such as low flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water-conserving equipment. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall indicate that separate irrigation lines for recycled water shall be constructed and recycled water will be used when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. Planning and Building 35 MM 5.2-2: Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. The property owner/developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property owner/developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage: a. Use non-solvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; b. Use solvent-based coatings, where they are necessary. Planning and Building 36 MM 5.1-2: Prior to issuance of building permits, all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of the building shall be shown on plans as fully screened from view of adjacent public rights-of-way and from adjacent properties by architectural devices and/or appropriate building materials. A note indicating that these improvements will be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Planning and Building 37 MM 5.12-17: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of compliance with Government Code Section 53080 (Schools). Planning and Building 38 MM 5.1-12: Prior to issuance of each building permit, all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be shown on plans as shielded from public view and the sound buffered to comply with City of Anaheim noise ordinances from any adjacent residential or transient-occupied Planning and Building -19- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY properties. A note indicating that these improvements shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 39 MM 5.10-10: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on-site noise sources are designed to meet the City’s 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more restrictive. Planning and Building 40 MM 5.10-9: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels would be less than 65 dBA CNEL for outdoor use areas (including dining patios, pools, playgrounds, or outdoor gathering areas). This requirement can be accomplished through shielding areas behind buildings or the construction of a noise barrier. Planning and Building 41 MM 5.17-3: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent. Planning and Building 42 MM 5.5-3: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Planning Department, Building Services Division for review and approval showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the California Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim. Planning and Building 43 MM 5.5-1: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer. Planning and Building 44 MM 5.10-12: Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and submitted to the Planning and Building Department, Building Division, to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. Planning and Building 45 MM 5.1-11: Prior to issuance of each building permits, unless records indicate previous payment, a fee for street tree purposes shall be paid or cause to be paid to the City of Anaheim based on the length of street frontage in an amount as established by City Council resolution or credit against the fee given for City authorized improvements installed by the property owner/developer. Planning and Building 46 MM 5.5-2: Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning and Building Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing. Planning and Building -20- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY 47 MM 5.12-1: Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security provisions during both the construction and operative phases for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (e.g., building design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas). Police 48 MM 5.12-4: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the project design shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department. Police 49 MM 5.12-2: Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit television monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department. Said measures shall be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections. Police 50 MM 5.15-2: Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval of, the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire Department. Public Utilities 51 MM 5.15-5: Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan and building permits, plans shall specifically show that the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment will be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, aboveground and behind the building setback line in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys and in accordance with Ordinance No. 4156. Prior to the final building and zoning inspections, the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, in accordance with the Final Site Plan and the building permit plans. Public Utilities 52 MM 5.17-1: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/develop shall consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Business and Community Programs Division, in order to review energy efficient measures to incorporate into the project design. Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner developer shall implement these energy efficient measures which may include the following: a. High-efficiency air-conditioning systems with EMS (computer) control b. Variable air volume (VAV) distribution c. Outside air (100%) economizer cycle d. Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads e. Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas f. Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air-handling units, and fan-coil units) g. Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces h. Use of compact fluorescent lamps Public Utilities -21- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY i. Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps j. Use of light emitting diode (LED) or equivalent energy-efficient lighting for outdoor lighting k. Use of Energy Star® exit lighting or exit signage. l. Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified m. Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high- pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots n. Consideration of thermal energy storage air-conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods. o. For swimming pools and spas, incorporate solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors, as feasible. p. Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: i. New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $10,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems ii. New Construction – cash incentives ($300 to $400 per kW reduction in load) for efficiency that exceeds Title 24 requirements iii. Green Building Program – offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance. 53 MM 5.15-1: Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems. b. Use of waterway recirculation systems. c. Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals. d. Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves. e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors. f. Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels. g. Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other water- using appliances. h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest. i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation. j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible. Public Utilities -22- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY 54 MM 5.15-6: Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous payment, the appropriate fees for Primary Mains, Secondary Mains and Fire Protection Service shall be paid to the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division in accordance with Rule 15A, and Rule 20 of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules and Regulations. Public Utilities 55 MM 5.14-2: Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the property owner/developer. The property owner shall also participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts, which have been established. Public Works 56 MM 5.14-13: Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall show that all driveways shall be constructed with a minimum fifteen (15) foot radius curb returns as required by the City Engineer, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. Public Works 57 MM 5.14-12: Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the location of any proposed gates across a driveway shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates shall conform to the current version of Engineering Standard Detail No. 475. Public Works 58 MM 5.8-6: Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Public Works 59 MM 5.19-1: Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning Inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as administered by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final building and zoning inspection, implementation of said plan shall commence and shall remain in full effect. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation include, but are not limited to: a. Detailing the location and design of on-site recycling facilities. b. Providing on-site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling. c. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for hazardous material disposal. d. Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City. In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs, as required by the Public Works Department, including, but not limited to: a. Facilitating recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins. Public Works -23- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY b. Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and storing. c. Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing adequate space for sorting and storing. d. Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection. e. Prohibiting curbside pick-up. 60 MM 5.19-3: Prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall show that trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works, Operations Division. On an ongoing basis, trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Public Works 61 MM 5.19-4: Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall demonstrate that the plans include provisions for the installation of trash and recycle receptacles near all benches and near high traffic areas such as plazas, transit stops and retail and dining establishments. Public Works 62 MM 5.18-3: Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City shall require that building plans indicate that new developments will minimize stormwater and urban runoff into drainage facilities by incorporating design features such as detention basins, on-site water features, and other strategies. Public Works PRIOR TO APPROVAL OF WATER IMPROVEMENT PLANS 63 MM 5.12-15: Prior to approval of on-site water plans, unless each commercial building is initially connected to separate fire services, an unsubordinated covenant satisfactory to the City Attorney’s Office shall be recorded prohibiting any individual sale of buildings until separate fire services are installed in the building(s) subject to the sale. Fire 64 MM 5.12-16: Prior to approval of water improvement plans, the water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection services in accordance with Fire Department requirements. Fire PRIOR TO FINAL INSPECTIONS 65 MM 3.12-5 (FEIR No. 311, MMP No. 67) The applicant shall participate in a landscape assessment and maintenance district, if one is established for the City of Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area. City Attorney’s Office 66 MM 5.17-2: Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. Electrical Service Fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. Planning and Building 67 MM 5.12-10: Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department. Fire -24- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY 68 MM 5.5-4: Prior to the final building and zoning inspection for a hotel/motel, the property owner/developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review and approval by the Fire Department. The plan shall require posted notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures and incorporate ongoing earthquake training for hotel staff to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. Fire 69 MM 5.1-7 and 5.8-4: Prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department a letter from a licensed landscape architect certifying that all landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approved in connection with the Final Site Plan. Planning and Building 70 MM 5.15-7: Prior to final building and zoning inspections, a separate water meter shall be installed for landscape water on all projects where the landscape area exceeds 2,500 square feet in accordance with Ordinance No. 6160. Planning and Building 71 MM 5.1-6: Prior to final building and zoning inspections, root and sidewalk barriers shall be provided for trees within seven feet of public sidewalks. Planning and Building 72 MM 5.8-5: Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install piping on-site with project water mains so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available. Public Utilities 73 MM 5.14-4: Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in conjunction with the on-going operation of the project. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these programs ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. Public Works 74 MM 5.14-8: Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office. Objectives of the TDM program shall be: a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests. b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project- generated trips. c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership. Public Works 75 MM 5.14-9: Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons’ transportation options. These options may include, but are not limited to, the list below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. a. On-site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on-site services such as Public Works -25- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY the food, retail, and other services. b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs. d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on-site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests. f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts. j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem). l. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single- occupant auto to travel to work. m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles. n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools. o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for -26- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY bicycling to work. p. Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. 76 MM 5.14-21: Prior to the final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact that will be responsible for coordinating with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on-site coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the project with the ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. Public Works ONGOING DURING PROJECT OPERATIONS 77 MM 5.12-13: Prior to the placement of building materials on a building site, an all-weather road shall be provided from the roadway system to and on the construction site and for fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire Department. Such routes shall be paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to Fire Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet the requirements of Section 10.204 of the Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by the City of Anaheim. Fire 78 MM 5.12-5: Prior to commencement of structural framing on each parcel or lot, onsite fire hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner/developer as required and approved by the Fire Department. Fire 79 MM 5.10-1: Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers. Planning and Building 80 MM 5.2-3: Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce construction-related air quality impacts. These measures shall include, but are not limited to: a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable. b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as parking) on-site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the on-site haul roads shall be paved. c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil binders, according to manufacturer’s specification, to exposed piles. d. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported from the Planning and Building -27- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY project site occur. e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered prior to entering public streets. g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas. h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes. i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less. k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts. l. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.) where practicable. n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned. p. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable. 81 MM 5.10-7: Ongoing during construction and project operation, sweeping operations in the parking facilities and private on-site roadways shall be performed utilizing sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than 60 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line. Planning and Building 82 MM 5.10-6: Ongoing during construction and project operation, pressure washing operations for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to graffiti or other aesthetical considerations shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM. Planning and Building 83 MM 5.14-7: Ongoing during construction, if the Anaheim Police Department or the Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair-share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. Police Public Works 84 MM 5.2-1: Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as practicable. Planning and Building 85 MM 5.8-3: Ongoing during project operations, the property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City Planning and Building -28- PC2017-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY of Anaheim on a monthly basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots. The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited. 86 MM 5.1-10: Ongoing, a licensed arborist shall be hired by the property owner/developer to be responsible for all tree trimming. Planning and Building 87 MM 5.1-9: Ongoing, any tree planted within the Setback Realm shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building 88 MM 5.1-8: Ongoing, all on-site non-Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, and Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, within area in which dedication has not been accepted by the City, shall be maintained by the property owner/developer, in compliance with City standards. Planning and Building 89 MM 5.1-3: Ongoing, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the removal of any on-site graffiti within 24 hours of its application. Planning and Building 90 MM 5.12-3: Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall provide private security on the premises to maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to review and approval of the Police Department. The use of security patrols and electronic security devices (i.e., video monitors) should be considered to reduce the potential for criminal activity in the area. Police 91 MM 5.15-9: Ongoing, the City shall continue to collaborate with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), its member agencies, and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to ensure that available water supplies meet anticipated demand. If it is forecasted that water demand exceeds available supplies, staff shall recommend to City Council to trigger application of the Water Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, §10.18), as prescribed, to require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by the Ordinance. Public Utilities 92 MM 5.19-2: Ongoing during project operation, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer: a. Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and packaging. b. Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard. c. Collection of office paper for recycling. d. Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling. e. Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. Public Works 93 MM 5.18-2: Ongoing, the City shall work with the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) to ensure that flood control facilities are well maintained and capable of accommodating, at a minimum, future 25-year storm flows for City- owned and maintained facilities, and 100-year storm flows for County facilities. Where improvements to local drainage facilities have the potential to increase discharges to County facilities, the City shall analyze potential impacts to County facilities in consultation with the Manager, County of Orange Flood Control Division. Encroachment Permits shall be obtained from the County’s Public Property Permits Section for any activity performed within OCFCD’s right of way. Public Works Department ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 PARKING LETTER JUSTIFICATION FOR ANAHEIM ELEMENT HOTEL 200 WEST ALRO WAY The Anaheim Element is proposing to demolish the existing retail building to construct a new hotel facility. Per Section 18.42.040 of the Anaheim Municipal Code 144 parking spaces are required. We are proposing to have 132 parking spaces a 8% deviation of code requirements. A deviation of 10% or less from the requirements for parking may be processed subject to Section No. 18.42.050 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The following findings must be met to approve an administrative adjustment: 1. The adjustment is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code; Section No. 18.42.040 of the Anaheim Municipal Code permits a 10% deviation of the required number of parking spaces. We are requesting an 8% deviation in the number of required parking spaces (144 spaces required; 132 spaces proposed). 2. The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code that do not require the adjustment; Without the deviation of the number of parking spaces we cannot provide a better circulation within the parking are and provide adequate on-site drop-off area for the hotel due to the limited area within the site and the irregular shape of the site. 3. The adjustment will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood; The adjustment will not negatively impact the site nor will it be detrimental to other properties as the site will adequately be able to provide parking for all of the guests of the hotel. The site will provide shuttles to various attraction locations using the Anaheim Resort Transportation Shuttle or many guests staying at hotel may use uber to provide transportation to destinations. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use; The project sites’ close proximity to the Disneyland Resort and the Anaheim Convention Center, make walking and using the existing available low-cost transportation (ART) the most logical choice for the majority of the Guests who will stay in the proposed hotel. Also most guests now use Uber or are bused to the site so as not to have to use a motor vehicle therefore the need for parking spaces is decreased. ATTACHMENT NO. 5 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; No adjacent public streets currently allow on-street parking which includes Disney Way, Clementine, and Manchester Avenue. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance with subsection .030 of Section 18.42.050 (Non- Residential Uses- Shared Parking Arrangements)); There will be no increased demand or completion for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate facility as there will be adequate parking provided on-site and surrounding properties parking areas will be for property guests only. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; The absence of twelve of the code required parking stalls as requested by this administrative adjustment will not create any traffic or congestion within the proposed development’s off-street parking areas. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The project has been designed to coordinate with other properties vehicle ingress and egress therefore the project will not impede vehicular ingress or egress from adjacent properties. City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Planning Services Division 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Anaheim, California 92805 TEL: 714.765.5139 FAX: 714.765.5280 To: File DEV2016-00055 From: Elaine Thienprasiddhi, Senior Planner Date: December 1, 2016 RE: Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340, Compliance with Measures Required Prior to Final Site Plan Approval Staff has verified that the applicant has complied with all mitigation measures that are required to be fulfilled prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, as follows: MM 5.12-12: Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit, plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as being in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code. MM 5.1-14: Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that no shuttle/bus/vehicular drop-off areas shall be permitted in hotel/motel or vacation resort front setback area. MM 5.1-13: Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that the rear elevations of buildings visible from off-site areas shall be architecturally accented to portray a finished look. MM 5.1-4: Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the location and configuration of all lighting fixtures including ground-mounted lighting fixtures utilized to accent buildings, landscape elements, or to illuminate pedestrian areas shall be shown on all Final Site Plans. All proposed surface parking area lighting fixtures shall be down-lighted with a maximum height of 12 feet adjacent to any residential properties. All lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighting toward the area to be illuminated and away from adjacent residential property lines. MM 5.1-1: Prior to final site plan approval, the property owner/developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning and Building Department for review and approval demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would avoid creating significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses to the maximum extent feasible. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas (e.g., outdoor eating areas, hotel/motel swimming pools, and residential front and back yards) or structures that include sensitive uses (e.g., residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 File DEV2013-00138 November 25, 2015 Page 2 of 2 MM 5.10-2: Prior to approval of each final site plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise-sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property owner/developer prior to final building and zoning inspections. MM 5.4-3: Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old, property owners/developers shall submit to the Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division, documentation to verify the presence/absence of historic resources. On properties where resources are identified, such documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist. MM 5.12-1: Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security provisions during both the construction and operative phases for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (e.g., building design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas). MM 5.15-5: Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan and building permits, plans shall specifically show that the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment will be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, aboveground and behind the building setback line in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys and in accordance with Ordinance No. 4156. Prior to the final building and zoning inspections, the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, in accordance with the Final Site Plan and the building permit plans. A T T A C H M E N T N O . 7 A 4 . 0 2 PLA N T E R POOL TRAS H DR O P - O F F D R O P O F F F OF O F - OP O P DR D R O O O O K K K K K K K K K K SI D E W A L K S I I D D D E E E W W W W A A L L L K L K I D D D E E E E W W W W A A A A A A L L L K K L K K A A L W W W A E W W W D D D E I I D S A L L L L K W W WA A A E E E E W W W W D D D E S S S S S S S S S A L K K K K K L L K L L A K K K K L L L K K K K L L L L A K K K K K K L L L L A S I D E W A A A W W A W W E W D E D D I D S S S A W W W W W W W W E E E E D D D D D I I I S S S S A A A W A W W W W W E E E E E D D D D I S S S A A A W A W W W W W W E E E E D D D I S S S L K K K K K L K K K K K K K K K K K L L K K K K K L L S I D E W A L A A A A A W W A W W W E E W D E E D D D D S S S L L L L A A A A A W W W W W E W W W E E E E D D D D S S S L A A A A W W W W W W W W W E E E E E D D D D D S S S L A A A A W W W W W W W E E E E D D D S S S S S S S S S I D E W A L K K K L L L A A L W A A A W W W A W W W E E W D E E D D D S I D S S S K K K K K L A A A W W W E E E W E D D D S S S S K K K L L L A A A A A A W W W W E E E E D D D D D I I S S S S K K K K K L L L L L L A A A A A A W A W W W W W E E E E E D D D D D D I S S S S I D E W A L K K K K L L K A L L A A A W W A A W W W E W W E E E D D E D D I K K K K L L L L A A A A W W W W A W W W W W E E E D D D D K K K L L L L L A A A A W W W W W E E E E D D D K K K K K K L L L L L A A A A A A W A W W W W W W E E E E E D D D S I S I I S S S S I S S S S S S S S S AL K L L K K K K L L K K K K L K K L L L K K L L L L K K K EW A L E W W W W WA WA A A A L E E E W W W W W W W A A A A W A A L W W W A E E E W A A A A L L W W W W W W W E E DE D E E E D E SI D S S S S I I D D S S S I D D D D D S I I D S S S S S I I D D D S S S S SI D E W A L K S S S D D D E E E W W W W W A A A A L L L K K K K S S S D D D D E E E W W W W W A W W W W W A A A A L L L K K K K K L L K K K A A L L W W WA A E E W W D D E W I I D D S S S S K K K K A A L L L L L L W W W A A A E E E W W W W D D D D D D E E S S S I EN T R Y E N T R Y Y Y TR T R EN E N RAMPAMAMAMAMAMAMAMMMAMAMAMAMAMAMAMAMAMAMRAAPPRRAMPRRAAMAMAMAMAMAMAMM DOW NWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWN D OOWOWOOOWOWOWOWWOOWOOWOOOWW N D WWNWN D O W N P L A N T E R P L A N T E R SID E W A L K S S S I I D D D E E E W W W W A A A L L L K K K S S I D D D E E E W W W A W W W W W A A A L L L K K K K K L L K K A A L K W W A A E E W W W D D E E S S D S K L L L K K W A A A E E E E W W W D D D D S S S S PL A N T E R NGG LOAD I N G LO AD IN 2'2' 20'X1 2 ' 20 X 2 S I D D I S S I I S I I S S S S S S NG 2'2'NG P P DE E D E E D E E E E E DE D D D E D D T TE R K K K S S S S S A A A A A A A A E S S S L L L L L E ERTER NTETTE PLA AL L L L A S TE R ALDEN &SSOCIATES C1 5 S T O R Y H O T E L PR O P O S E D 5 STORY HOTEL PROPOSEDPROPOSED GARAGE PARKING PR O P O S E D GA R A G E P A R K I N G NO T E : M A N C H E S T E R A V E N U E A N D M A N C H E S T E R A V E N U E A ND A L R O W A Y S T R E E T R I G H T - O F - W A Y A N D R E Q U I R E D IM P R O V E M E N T S , I N C L U D I N G , B U T N O T L I M I T E D T O , CR O S S W A L K , A D A A C C E S S R A M P A N D P O R T I O N O F SI D E W A L K , C U R B A N D G U T T E R , R E M O V A L A N D RE P L A C E M E N T S H A L L B E I N A C C O R D A N C E W I T H T H E MA N C H E S T E R / C L E M E N T I N E P R E C I S E A L I G N M E N T , S I G N A L PL A N S , A N D A S D E T E R M I N E D B Y T H E C I T Y E N G I N E E R . NO T E : M A N C H E S T E R A V E N U E A N D A L R O W A Y S T R E E T RI G H T - O F - W A Y A N D R E Q U I R E D I M P R O V E M E N T S , IN C L U D I N G , B U T N O T L I M I T E D T O , C R O S S W A L K , A D A A CC E S S R A M P A N D P O R T I O N O F S I D E W A L K , C U R B A N D GU T T E R , R E M O V A L A N D R E P L A C M E N T S H A L L B E I N A CC O R D A N C E W I T H T H E M A N C H E S T E R / C L E M E N T I N E PR E C I S E A L I G N M E N T , S I G N A L P L A N , A N D A S D E T E R M I N E D BY T H E C I T Y E N G I N E E R . PLA N T E R POO L TRA S H DR O P - O F F D R O P O F F F OF O F OP O P DR D R SI D E W A L K S S S I I D D D E E E W W W W W A A L L L K L K K K S S S S I I D D D D E E E E W W W W W A A A L L W W W A A A L L L K K K K K L K K K K A A A AL L L L W W W WA A A E EW W W D D D D E S I I I I D S S S K K K K K A L L L L L L L L L K W WA WA WA A A A A A A A A A E E E E E E W W W W W W I D D D D D E E E S S S S S S S S K K S S S S S S I D E W A L K K K K K L L K A L L A A A W W A W W W E E W D E D D S I D S S S S K K K K K L L L A A A A A W W W W W A W W W W E E E E D D D D D I I I I S S S S S S K K K K K L L L L A A A A A W A W W W W W W W E E E E E D D D D D D D D I I S S S K K K K K K K K K K L L L L L L L L L L L A A A A A A A A A W A W A W W A W W W W W W W W W E E E E E E E E D D D D D D D I S S S S S S S A A A A A A A A A S I D E W A L K K K L K K L L L A A L W A A A W W W A W W W E E W D E E D D D S I D S S I S S K K K K K L L K K K A L A L L L A A A A A W W W W W W E E W E W W E E E E D D D D D D D S S S S S K K K K K L L L L A L L A A A A A A A W W W W W W W E W E W E E E E E E E E E D D D D D D D D D D I I S S S S S S K K K K K K K K K K K L L L L L L A A A A A A W W W W W W W W E E E E E E D D D D I I I S S S S S S S S S L L L L L L S I D E W A L K K K K K L L L A A L W A A A W W W A W W W E E W D E E D D D S D S S S S K K K K L K K K A A L L L L A A A A W W W W W W W E E E W W W E E E E D D D D S S S S K K K L L L L A A A A A A A W W W W W W W W E E E E E E E E E E D D D D D D D D D D I S S S S S S K K K K K K K K L L L L L L L L L A A A A A A A A A A A A A W A W A W A W W W W W W W W W W W E E E E E E E E E E D D D D D D D D D D I S S S S S S S S S S S I D E W A L K K K K K L L K A L L A A A W W A A W W E W W E E E D D E I D D S I S S K K K K K L L L L L L L A A A A W W W W A W A W W W W W E E E E D D D D D D I I I I I I S S S S K K K K K K L L L L L L L L A A A A A A W W W W W W E W E E E E E E D D D D I I S S S S S K K K K K K K K K K L L L L L L L A A A A A A A A A A A A A W A W W A W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W W E E E E E E E E E E D D D D D D D D I S S S S S S S S I D D I I I S I I S S I I I S S S S S SI D E W A L K S S S S I D I D D E D E E EW E W W W W W WA A WA A A L A L L L K K K K S S S I D D D D E E E W W W W W D D D E E E W W W W W A A A A L L L K K K K L K K K A L L L L K W A A A A L W W W W W A E E E E W W W W D D D E E S I I D S S S S S K L L L L L K K K K A A A A A A A L L L L W W W W W W W W W W W W W D E E E E E E E E S S S I I D D D D D S S S S S DE E D E D E E E E DE D D D E D D AL L L A SI D E W A L K S S S D D D E E E W W W W W A A A A A L A L L K K K K S S S I D D D D E E E W W W W W E W W W W W A A A A A L L L K K K K K L L K K K A A A L L W W WA A A E E E W W W D D E W W W I I D D E S S S D S S K K K K A A L L L L L W W W W A A A E E E W W W D D D D E E S S S S I EN T R Y E N T R Y Y Y TR T R EN E N RAM PAMAMAMAMAMAMAMMMAMAMAMAMAMAMAMAMRAAPP R A M P RRAAMAMM DOW NWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWNWN D OOWOOOOWOWOOWWOOWW N D WWN D O N P L A N T E R E P L A N T E R E SI D E W A L K S S S S I D I D D E D E E E W W W W A A A L L L K K K S S S I I D D D D E E E E W W W WA A A W W W W W W A A A A L L L L K K K K K K L L K K A A L K W W A A E E E W W W W W D D D E E E E S S D D D D S S SI K K L L L L L L K K K K W A A A A A A A A A E E E E E E E E E E E E EW W W W D D D D D D S S S S S S S S PL A N T E R P P TE R LOA D I N G LO AD N GNGNG 20'X1 2 ' 20 X1 2'2'2' ALDEN &SSOCIATES C2UTILITY S S 1 S S 1 S S 1 L T 4 . 0 1 L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - N O R T H V I E W 1 . V E R I F Y M O U N T I N G L O C A T I O N S A N D H E I G H T S O F A L L D E V I C E S W I T H A R C H I T E C T P R I O R T O I N S T A L L A T I O N . 2 . A L L F I X T U R E A N D C O N T R O L L O C A T I O N S M U S T B E V E R I F I E D B Y T H E L I G H T I N G C O N S U L T A N T A T T H E J O B S I T E P R I O R T O R O U G H - I N . 3 . L O O P I N G I N D I C A T E S C O N T R O L Z O N E D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . R E F E R T O E L E C T R I C A L D R A W I N G S F O R D I M M I N G , S W I T C H I N G A N D C I R C U I T R Y I N F O R M A T I O N . 4 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E S P O N S I B L E F O R P R O V I D I N G A L L L A B O R A N D E Q U I P M E N T T H A T I S N E C E S S A R Y F O R T H E F O C U S A I M I N G O F A D J U S T A B L E L I G H T I N G F I X T U R E S A N D T H E P R O G R A M M I N G O F L I G H T I N G P R E S E T S O R E F F E C T S P E R T H E D I R E C T I O N O F T H E L I G H T I N G D E S I G N C O N S U L T A N T . 5 . E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R , F I X T U R E S U P P L I E R , A N D L A M P S U P P L I E R M U S T V E R I F Y T H A T A L L L E D L A M P S A R E C O M P A T I B L E W I T H F I X T U R E T R I M H O U S I N G S , L A M P S O C K E T S , L O W V O L T A G E T R A N S F O R M E R S , A N D E L E C T R I C A L D I M M I N G S Y S T E M S P R I O R T O P L A C I N G A N Y L I G H T I N G E Q U I P M E N T O R D E R S A F T E R F I X T U R E S H O P D R A W I N G S U B M I T T A L S A R E A P P R O V E D . L A M P S S H O U L D B E O P E R A B L E A T F U L L O R D I M M E D I N T E N S I T Y W I T H N O V I S U A L L Y P E R C E I V E D F L I C K E R I N G W H E N A L L L A M P S O N T H E C I R C U I T A R E E N E R G I Z E D . G E N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S T H I S D R A W I N G R E L A T E S T O L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y D O E S N O T A S S U M E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R S T R U C T U R A L I N T E G R I T Y , B U I L D I N G , R I G G I N G , C O N S T R U C T I O N , F A B R I C A T I O N , M A T E R I A L , O R E Q U I P M E N T . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y W I L L N O T B E H E L D R E S P O N S I B L E F O R T H E I N A B I L I T Y O F C O N T R A C T O R S O R B U I L D E R S T O E X E C U T E T H E D E S I G N P L A N S . A L L E L E C T R I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N A N D L O C A L E N E R G Y C O D E C O M P L I A N C E F O R M S T O B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D E L E C T R I C A L E N G I N E E R O R E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R . A L L E Q U I P M E N T A T T A C H M E N T D E T A I L S A N D S T R U C T U R A L L O A D C A L C U L A T I O N S M U S T B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R . F O R L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N F O R M A T I O N O N L Y B A R I S 3 " L O N G W H E N P R I N T E D A T F U L L S C A L E L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - N O R T H V I E W 3 / 3 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " L T 4 . 0 1 1 L T 4 . 0 2 L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - S O U T H V I E W 1 . V E R I F Y M O U N T I N G L O C A T I O N S A N D H E I G H T S O F A L L D E V I C E S W I T H A R C H I T E C T P R I O R T O I N S T A L L A T I O N . 2 . A L L F I X T U R E A N D C O N T R O L L O C A T I O N S M U S T B E V E R I F I E D B Y T H E L I G H T I N G C O N S U L T A N T A T T H E J O B S I T E P R I O R T O R O U G H - I N . 3 . L O O P I N G I N D I C A T E S C O N T R O L Z O N E D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . R E F E R T O E L E C T R I C A L D R A W I N G S F O R D I M M I N G , S W I T C H I N G A N D C I R C U I T R Y I N F O R M A T I O N . 4 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E S P O N S I B L E F O R P R O V I D I N G A L L L A B O R A N D E Q U I P M E N T T H A T I S N E C E S S A R Y F O R T H E F O C U S A I M I N G O F A D J U S T A B L E L I G H T I N G F I X T U R E S A N D T H E P R O G R A M M I N G O F L I G H T I N G P R E S E T S O R E F F E C T S P E R T H E D I R E C T I O N O F T H E L I G H T I N G D E S I G N C O N S U L T A N T . 5 . E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R , F I X T U R E S U P P L I E R , A N D L A M P S U P P L I E R M U S T V E R I F Y T H A T A L L L E D L A M P S A R E C O M P A T I B L E W I T H F I X T U R E T R I M H O U S I N G S , L A M P S O C K E T S , L O W V O L T A G E T R A N S F O R M E R S , A N D E L E C T R I C A L D I M M I N G S Y S T E M S P R I O R T O P L A C I N G A N Y L I G H T I N G E Q U I P M E N T O R D E R S A F T E R F I X T U R E S H O P D R A W I N G S U B M I T T A L S A R E A P P R O V E D . L A M P S S H O U L D B E O P E R A B L E A T F U L L O R D I M M E D I N T E N S I T Y W I T H N O V I S U A L L Y P E R C E I V E D F L I C K E R I N G W H E N A L L L A M P S O N T H E C I R C U I T A R E E N E R G I Z E D . G E N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S T H I S D R A W I N G R E L A T E S T O L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y D O E S N O T A S S U M E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R S T R U C T U R A L I N T E G R I T Y , B U I L D I N G , R I G G I N G , C O N S T R U C T I O N , F A B R I C A T I O N , M A T E R I A L , O R E Q U I P M E N T . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y W I L L N O T B E H E L D R E S P O N S I B L E F O R T H E I N A B I L I T Y O F C O N T R A C T O R S O R B U I L D E R S T O E X E C U T E T H E D E S I G N P L A N S . A L L E L E C T R I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N A N D L O C A L E N E R G Y C O D E C O M P L I A N C E F O R M S T O B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D E L E C T R I C A L E N G I N E E R O R E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R . A L L E Q U I P M E N T A T T A C H M E N T D E T A I L S A N D S T R U C T U R A L L O A D C A L C U L A T I O N S M U S T B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R . F O R L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N F O R M A T I O N O N L Y B A R I S 3 " L O N G W H E N P R I N T E D A T F U L L S C A L E L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - S O U T H V I E W 3 / 3 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " L T 4 . 0 2 1 L T 4 . 0 3 L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - E A S T V I E W 1 . V E R I F Y M O U N T I N G L O C A T I O N S A N D H E I G H T S O F A L L D E V I C E S W I T H A R C H I T E C T P R I O R T O I N S T A L L A T I O N . 2 . A L L F I X T U R E A N D C O N T R O L L O C A T I O N S M U S T B E V E R I F I E D B Y T H E L I G H T I N G C O N S U L T A N T A T T H E J O B S I T E P R I O R T O R O U G H - I N . 3 . L O O P I N G I N D I C A T E S C O N T R O L Z O N E D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . R E F E R T O E L E C T R I C A L D R A W I N G S F O R D I M M I N G , S W I T C H I N G A N D C I R C U I T R Y I N F O R M A T I O N . 4 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E S P O N S I B L E F O R P R O V I D I N G A L L L A B O R A N D E Q U I P M E N T T H A T I S N E C E S S A R Y F O R T H E F O C U S A I M I N G O F A D J U S T A B L E L I G H T I N G F I X T U R E S A N D T H E P R O G R A M M I N G O F L I G H T I N G P R E S E T S O R E F F E C T S P E R T H E D I R E C T I O N O F T H E L I G H T I N G D E S I G N C O N S U L T A N T . 5 . E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R , F I X T U R E S U P P L I E R , A N D L A M P S U P P L I E R M U S T V E R I F Y T H A T A L L L E D L A M P S A R E C O M P A T I B L E W I T H F I X T U R E T R I M H O U S I N G S , L A M P S O C K E T S , L O W V O L T A G E T R A N S F O R M E R S , A N D E L E C T R I C A L D I M M I N G S Y S T E M S P R I O R T O P L A C I N G A N Y L I G H T I N G E Q U I P M E N T O R D E R S A F T E R F I X T U R E S H O P D R A W I N G S U B M I T T A L S A R E A P P R O V E D . L A M P S S H O U L D B E O P E R A B L E A T F U L L O R D I M M E D I N T E N S I T Y W I T H N O V I S U A L L Y P E R C E I V E D F L I C K E R I N G W H E N A L L L A M P S O N T H E C I R C U I T A R E E N E R G I Z E D . G E N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S T H I S D R A W I N G R E L A T E S T O L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y D O E S N O T A S S U M E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R S T R U C T U R A L I N T E G R I T Y , B U I L D I N G , R I G G I N G , C O N S T R U C T I O N , F A B R I C A T I O N , M A T E R I A L , O R E Q U I P M E N T . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y W I L L N O T B E H E L D R E S P O N S I B L E F O R T H E I N A B I L I T Y O F C O N T R A C T O R S O R B U I L D E R S T O E X E C U T E T H E D E S I G N P L A N S . A L L E L E C T R I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N A N D L O C A L E N E R G Y C O D E C O M P L I A N C E F O R M S T O B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D E L E C T R I C A L E N G I N E E R O R E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R . A L L E Q U I P M E N T A T T A C H M E N T D E T A I L S A N D S T R U C T U R A L L O A D C A L C U L A T I O N S M U S T B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R . F O R L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N F O R M A T I O N O N L Y B A R I S 3 " L O N G W H E N P R I N T E D A T F U L L S C A L E L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - E A S T V I E W 3 / 3 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " L T 4 . 0 3 1 L T 4 . 0 4 L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - W E S T V I E W 1 . V E R I F Y M O U N T I N G L O C A T I O N S A N D H E I G H T S O F A L L D E V I C E S W I T H A R C H I T E C T P R I O R T O I N S T A L L A T I O N . 2 . A L L F I X T U R E A N D C O N T R O L L O C A T I O N S M U S T B E V E R I F I E D B Y T H E L I G H T I N G C O N S U L T A N T A T T H E J O B S I T E P R I O R T O R O U G H - I N . 3 . L O O P I N G I N D I C A T E S C O N T R O L Z O N E D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . R E F E R T O E L E C T R I C A L D R A W I N G S F O R D I M M I N G , S W I T C H I N G A N D C I R C U I T R Y I N F O R M A T I O N . 4 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E S P O N S I B L E F O R P R O V I D I N G A L L L A B O R A N D E Q U I P M E N T T H A T I S N E C E S S A R Y F O R T H E F O C U S A I M I N G O F A D J U S T A B L E L I G H T I N G F I X T U R E S A N D T H E P R O G R A M M I N G O F L I G H T I N G P R E S E T S O R E F F E C T S P E R T H E D I R E C T I O N O F T H E L I G H T I N G D E S I G N C O N S U L T A N T . 5 . E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R , F I X T U R E S U P P L I E R , A N D L A M P S U P P L I E R M U S T V E R I F Y T H A T A L L L E D L A M P S A R E C O M P A T I B L E W I T H F I X T U R E T R I M H O U S I N G S , L A M P S O C K E T S , L O W V O L T A G E T R A N S F O R M E R S , A N D E L E C T R I C A L D I M M I N G S Y S T E M S P R I O R T O P L A C I N G A N Y L I G H T I N G E Q U I P M E N T O R D E R S A F T E R F I X T U R E S H O P D R A W I N G S U B M I T T A L S A R E A P P R O V E D . L A M P S S H O U L D B E O P E R A B L E A T F U L L O R D I M M E D I N T E N S I T Y W I T H N O V I S U A L L Y P E R C E I V E D F L I C K E R I N G W H E N A L L L A M P S O N T H E C I R C U I T A R E E N E R G I Z E D . G E N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S T H I S D R A W I N G R E L A T E S T O L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y D O E S N O T A S S U M E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R S T R U C T U R A L I N T E G R I T Y , B U I L D I N G , R I G G I N G , C O N S T R U C T I O N , F A B R I C A T I O N , M A T E R I A L , O R E Q U I P M E N T . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y W I L L N O T B E H E L D R E S P O N S I B L E F O R T H E I N A B I L I T Y O F C O N T R A C T O R S O R B U I L D E R S T O E X E C U T E T H E D E S I G N P L A N S . A L L E L E C T R I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N A N D L O C A L E N E R G Y C O D E C O M P L I A N C E F O R M S T O B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D E L E C T R I C A L E N G I N E E R O R E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R . A L L E Q U I P M E N T A T T A C H M E N T D E T A I L S A N D S T R U C T U R A L L O A D C A L C U L A T I O N S M U S T B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R . F O R L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N F O R M A T I O N O N L Y B A R I S 3 " L O N G W H E N P R I N T E D A T F U L L S C A L E L I G H T I N G E L E V A T I O N - W E S T V I E W 3 / 3 2 " = 1 ' - 0 " L T 4 . 0 4 1 L T 5 . 0 0 L I G H T I N G C O N C E P T I M A G E S 1 . V E R I F Y M O U N T I N G L O C A T I O N S A N D H E I G H T S O F A L L D E V I C E S W I T H A R C H I T E C T P R I O R T O I N S T A L L A T I O N . 2 . A L L F I X T U R E A N D C O N T R O L L O C A T I O N S M U S T B E V E R I F I E D B Y T H E L I G H T I N G C O N S U L T A N T A T T H E J O B S I T E P R I O R T O R O U G H - I N . 3 . L O O P I N G I N D I C A T E S C O N T R O L Z O N E D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . R E F E R T O E L E C T R I C A L D R A W I N G S F O R D I M M I N G , S W I T C H I N G A N D C I R C U I T R Y I N F O R M A T I O N . 4 . T H E C O N T R A C T O R I S R E S P O N S I B L E F O R P R O V I D I N G A L L L A B O R A N D E Q U I P M E N T T H A T I S N E C E S S A R Y F O R T H E F O C U S A I M I N G O F A D J U S T A B L E L I G H T I N G F I X T U R E S A N D T H E P R O G R A M M I N G O F L I G H T I N G P R E S E T S O R E F F E C T S P E R T H E D I R E C T I O N O F T H E L I G H T I N G D E S I G N C O N S U L T A N T . 5 . E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R , F I X T U R E S U P P L I E R , A N D L A M P S U P P L I E R M U S T V E R I F Y T H A T A L L L E D L A M P S A R E C O M P A T I B L E W I T H F I X T U R E T R I M H O U S I N G S , L A M P S O C K E T S , L O W V O L T A G E T R A N S F O R M E R S , A N D E L E C T R I C A L D I M M I N G S Y S T E M S P R I O R T O P L A C I N G A N Y L I G H T I N G E Q U I P M E N T O R D E R S A F T E R F I X T U R E S H O P D R A W I N G S U B M I T T A L S A R E A P P R O V E D . L A M P S S H O U L D B E O P E R A B L E A T F U L L O R D I M M E D I N T E N S I T Y W I T H N O V I S U A L L Y P E R C E I V E D F L I C K E R I N G W H E N A L L L A M P S O N T H E C I R C U I T A R E E N E R G I Z E D . G E N E R A L S H E E T N O T E S T H I S D R A W I N G R E L A T E S T O L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N T E N T O N L Y . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y D O E S N O T A S S U M E R E S P O N S I B I L I T Y F O R S T R U C T U R A L I N T E G R I T Y , B U I L D I N G , R I G G I N G , C O N S T R U C T I O N , F A B R I C A T I O N , M A T E R I A L , O R E Q U I P M E N T . T H E R U Z I K A C O M P A N Y W I L L N O T B E H E L D R E S P O N S I B L E F O R T H E I N A B I L I T Y O F C O N T R A C T O R S O R B U I L D E R S T O E X E C U T E T H E D E S I G N P L A N S . A L L E L E C T R I C A L I N F O R M A T I O N A N D L O C A L E N E R G Y C O D E C O M P L I A N C E F O R M S T O B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D E L E C T R I C A L E N G I N E E R O R E L E C T R I C A L C O N T R A C T O R . A L L E Q U I P M E N T A T T A C H M E N T D E T A I L S A N D S T R U C T U R A L L O A D C A L C U L A T I O N S M U S T B E P R O V I D E D B Y A L I C E N S E D S T R U C T U R A L E N G I N E E R . F O R L I G H T I N G D E S I G N I N F O R M A T I O N O N L Y NTS Request Number: Date:Project Name: Address: City / State / Zip: Scale: Drawn: This is an original unpublished drawing created by Coast Sign, Inc. It is submitted for your personal use in conjunction with a project being planned for you by Coast Sign, Inc., And shall not be reproduced, used by or disclosed to any firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without written permission. No.Revision Notes Designer Date 11 X 17 TEMPLATE VERSION 8.2 DESIGN DRAWING of Client Approval:Sales:Date:File Location:4 5 6 1 2 3 No.Revision Notes Designer Date 10 11 12 7 8 9 4 DEV-COAS-00377-R5 W:\Coast-In-House\Art\Drawings\DEV-COAS-00377 Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. John A. FLH 10-26-16 12/15/16 Anaheim, CARodel B. Fred. S. COAST IN-HOUSE 200 Alro way 09-06-16 10-19-16JJ FLH John A. 10-20-16 10-26-16 N AREA MAP SIGNAGE SPECIFICATIONSSITE PLAN A C B CHANNEL LETTERS Manufacture and Install (1) set of Channel Letters CHANNEL LETTERS Manufacture and Install (1) set of Channel Letters CHANNEL LETTERS Manufacture and Install (1) set of Channel Letters 1 B AC NTS Request Number: Date:Project Name: Address: City / State / Zip: Scale: Drawn: This is an original unpublished drawing created by Coast Sign, Inc. It is submitted for your personal use in conjunction with a project being planned for you by Coast Sign, Inc., And shall not be reproduced, used by or disclosed to any firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without written permission. No.Revision Notes Designer Date 11 X 17 TEMPLATE VERSION 8.2 DESIGN DRAWING of Client Approval:Sales:Date:File Location:4 5 6 1 2 3 No.Revision Notes Designer Date 10 11 12 7 8 9 4 DEV-COAS-00377-R5 W:\Coast-In-House\Art\Drawings\DEV-COAS-00377 Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. John A. FLH 10-26-16 12/15/16 Anaheim, CARodel B. Fred. S. COAST IN-HOUSE 200 Alro way 09-06-16 10-19-16JJ FLH John A. 10-20-16 10-26-16 2 EAST ELEVATION @ ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERSAScale: 1:250 A 19'-6" 12 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 249.18 SQ. FT. NTS Request Number: Date:Project Name: Address: City / State / Zip: Scale: Drawn: This is an original unpublished drawing created by Coast Sign, Inc. It is submitted for your personal use in conjunction with a project being planned for you by Coast Sign, Inc., And shall not be reproduced, used by or disclosed to any firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without written permission. No.Revision Notes Designer Date 11 X 17 TEMPLATE VERSION 8.2 DESIGN DRAWING of Client Approval:Sales:Date:File Location:4 5 6 1 2 3 No.Revision Notes Designer Date 10 11 12 7 8 9 4 DEV-COAS-00377-R5 W:\Coast-In-House\Art\Drawings\DEV-COAS-00377 Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. John A. FLH 10-26-16 12/15/16 Anaheim, CARodel B. Fred. S. COAST IN-HOUSE 200 Alro way 09-06-16 10-19-16JJ FLH John A. 10-20-16 10-26-16 NORTH ELEVATION @ ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERSB B Scale: 1:250 16'-3 1/2" 10 ' - 9 1 / 2 " 3 175.81 SQ. FT. NTS Request Number: Date:Project Name: Address: City / State / Zip: Scale: Drawn: This is an original unpublished drawing created by Coast Sign, Inc. It is submitted for your personal use in conjunction with a project being planned for you by Coast Sign, Inc., And shall not be reproduced, used by or disclosed to any firm or corporation for any purpose whatsoever without written permission. No.Revision Notes Designer Date 11 X 17 TEMPLATE VERSION 8.2 DESIGN DRAWING of Client Approval:Sales:Date:File Location:4 5 6 1 2 3 No.Revision Notes Designer Date 10 11 12 7 8 9 4 DEV-COAS-00377-R5 W:\Coast-In-House\Art\Drawings\DEV-COAS-00377 Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. Refer to PATHFINDER for details. John A. FLH 10-26-16 12/15/16 Anaheim, CARodel B. Fred. S. COAST IN-HOUSE 200 Alro way 09-06-16 10-19-16JJ FLH John A. 10-20-16 10-26-16 SOUTH ELEVATION @ ILLUMINATED CHANNEL LETTERS C Scale: 1:250 14'-2" 4 C 9' - 4 3 / 4 " 133 SQ. FT. Addendum to Final Environmental Impact Report No. 311 and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Development Project No. 2016-00055 Prepared for City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, California 92805 Prepared by BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, California 92707-8794 December 2016 ATTACHMENT NO. 8 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx i Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Page Section 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2.0 Purpose of the Document ................................................................................ 2-1 Section 3.0 Project Background ......................................................................................... 3-1 Section 4.0 Project Description .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1 Existing Conditions ................................................................................. 4-1 4.2 Proposed Project Improvements ............................................................ 4-1 4.2.1 Hotel Use .................................................................................... 4-1 4.2.2 LandscapE and Hardscape ......................................................... 4-2 4.2.3 SIGNS ......................................................................................... 4-2 4.2.4 Parking ........................................................................................ 4-2 4.2.5 Project access and Circulation .................................................... 4-2 4.2.6 Utilities ........................................................................................ 4-3 4.2.7 Drainage and Water Quality Features ........................................ 4-3 4.3 Discretionary Actions .............................................................................. 4-3 Section 5.0 Environmental Analysis ................................................................................... 5-1 5.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................... 5-2 5.1.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ........................... 5-2 5.1.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................... 5-3 5.2 Agriculture & Forest Resources .............................................................. 5-7 5.2.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ........................... 5-7 5.2.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................... 5-7 5.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................... 5-9 5.3.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ........................... 5-9 5.3.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................... 5-9 5.4 Biological Resources ............................................................................ 5-22 5.4.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-22 5.4.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-22 5.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................... 5-25 5.5.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-25 5.5.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-25 5.6 Geology ................................................................................................ 5-29 5.6.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-29 5.6.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-30 5.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................. 5-33 5.7.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-33 5.7.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-34 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx ii Table of Contents 5.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ....................................................... 5-38 5.8.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-38 5.8.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-38 5.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................ 5-43 5.9.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-43 5.9.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-44 5.10 Land Use .............................................................................................. 5-49 5.10.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-49 5.10.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-49 5.11 Mineral Resources ................................................................................ 5-51 5.11.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-51 5.11.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-51 5.12 Noise .................................................................................................... 5-52 5.12.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-52 5.12.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-53 5.13 Population and Housing ........................................................................ 5-60 5.13.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-60 5.13.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-61 5.14 Public Services ..................................................................................... 5-62 5.14.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-62 5.14.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-63 5.15 Recreation ............................................................................................ 5-69 5.15.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-69 5.15.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-69 5.16 Transportation/Traffic ............................................................................ 5-70 5.16.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-70 5.16.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-71 5.17 Water .................................................................................................... 5-77 5.17.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-77 5.17.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-78 5.18 Sewer ................................................................................................... 5-81 5.18.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-81 5.18.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-82 5.19 Electricity .............................................................................................. 5-86 5.19.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-86 5.19.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-87 5.20 Stormwater ........................................................................................... 5-89 5.20.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-89 5.20.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-90 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx iii Table of Contents 5.21 Public Utilities ....................................................................................... 5-92 5.21.1 Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-92 5.21.2 Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-93 Section 6.0 Summary of Findings ....................................................................................... 6-1 Section 7.0 Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340 ................................................................. 7-1 Section 8.0 References ........................................................................................................ 8-1 TABLES Table Page 1 Maximum Allowable Development ................................................................................. 1-2 2 Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions ....................................... 5-12 3 Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions ............................................. 5-13 4 Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions ...................................................... 5-14 5 Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions ............................................... 5-15 6 Cultural Resource Sites Within a half Mile of the Project Area .................................... 5-26 7 Cultural Resource Studies Within a half mile of the Project Area ................................ 5-26 8 Proposed Project Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions ................................................ 5-35 9 Worst-Case Construction Noise Levels at Nearest Receptors ..................................... 5-57 10 Student Generation Rates ............................................................................................ 5-64 11 Proposed Project Water Demand Increase .................................................................. 5-78 12 Projected Electrical Consumption ................................................................................ 5-87 EXHIBITS Exhibit Follows Page 1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Boundaries .................................................................... 3-1 2 Local and Regional Vicinity ............................................................................................ 4-1 3 Aerial Photograph .......................................................................................................... 4-1 4a–c Existing Site Views ......................................................................................................... 4-1 5 Site Plan ......................................................................................................................... 4-1 6 Elevations ....................................................................................................................... 4-1 7 Window Glazing Types .................................................................................................. 4-2 8 Landscape Plan ............................................................................................................. 4-2 9 Sound Wall Locations .................................................................................................... 4-2 10 Drainage Concept .......................................................................................................... 4-3 11 Shade and Shadow Analysis ......................................................................................... 5-4 12 Lighting Plan .................................................................................................................. 5-4 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx iv Table of Contents APPENDICES Appendix A AMC 18.114.100 – Commercial-Recreation Overlay B Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Report C Biological Resources Analysis D Historic Resources Memo E Geotechnical Report F Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report and EDR Report G Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan H Drainage Report I Noise Analysis J Trip Generation Study K Sewer Study Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 H:\CASES\DEV Projects\DEV2016 Cases\DEV2016-00055(eyt)\Environmental & Tech Reports\Public Review Draft Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 1-1 Introductio SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document is an Addendum to Environmental Impact Report No. 311 (EIR 311), prepared for the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) and Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 (EIR 340), prepared for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP). The City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency responsible for EIR 311, EIR 340, and this Addendum. The purpose of this Addendum is to analyze the differences between the environmental effects associated with implementation of the DRSP and ARSP and the Element Anaheim Hotel Project (the “Proposed Project”). As further described in this document, the analysis concludes that the anticipated impacts of the Proposed Project would either be the same or less than those analyzed by EIR 311 and EIR 340 for the implementation of the DRSP and ARSP, respectively, cumulatively, and as amended; no new significant impacts would result from the Proposed Project; and, no further environmental documentation is required pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA). In June 1993, the Anaheim City Council certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 311 (EIR 311) and approved Mitigation Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 67 for the DRSP. Zoning and development standards for the DRSP are incorporated into the City’s Zoning Code as Chapter 18.114. In September 1994, the Anaheim City Council certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313 (EIR 313) and the approved MMP No. 85 for the ARSP. Zoning and development standards for the ARSP are incorporated into the City’s Zoning Code as Chapter 18.116. In December 2012, the Anaheim City Council certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 (EIR 340) and approved MMP No. 85C in support of the approval of Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Project. EIR 340 is a supplemental EIR to EIR 313 and reevaluated all of the environmental changes that have occurred in and around The Anaheim Resort since certification of EIR 313 in September 1994. The Element Anaheim Hotel Project is proposed at 200 Alro Way in Anaheim, California. The Applicant, Singod Investors VI, LLC (Applicant), proposes to demolish an existing vacant building (formerly Bergstroms Childrens Store) and associated structures and pavement, and construct a five-story, 174-room hotel with one level of subterranean parking. Hotel amenities would include a breakfast room, swimming pool, fitness center, and common areas for hotel guests. A total of 132 on-site parking spaces would be provided in a combination of surface and subterranean parking. The Project site totals 1.94 acres and is comprised of three separate parcels, referred to in this document as Parcel A, B and C (refer to Exhibit 1, Specific Plan Boundaries). As further described below, the project site is located within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP). Parcel A (APN 082-213-10) is 1.34 acres. The majority of the site is within the boundaries of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) in the Parking District and the Commercial-Recreation (C-R) Overlay. The Applicant owns Parcel A and proposes to develop the property in accordance with the C-R Overlay. Parcel B is the westerly 0.26-acre portion of Alro Way, a public cul-de-sac street that provides vehicular access to Parcel A. Parcel B is owned by the City of Anaheim (City). The Applicant is requesting that the City abandon this property so that the Applicant may incorporate the property into the project site. Parcel C (APN 082-212-04) is 0.34 acres and is located within the boundaries of the ARSP in the C-R District. The ARSP permits the development of hotel on the site, up to a maximum density of 75 rooms per gross acre or parcel, whichever is greater, subject to the approval of a Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 H:\CASES\DEV Projects\DEV2016 Cases\DEV2016-00055(eyt)\Environmental & Tech Reports\Public Review Draft Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 1-2 Introductio Final Site Plan. Parcel C is owned by the City. The City has authorized the Applicant to pursue entitlement on the City-owned parcel. The abandonment of Parcel B and the sale of Parcels B and C by the City of Anaheim to the Applicant require approval by City Council, and are contingent upon the Planning Commission approval of the Proposed Project. Parcels B and C would be incorporated into the Project Site via a lot line adjustment, contingent upon Planning Commission approval of the Proposed Project and City Council approval of the street abandonment and sale of Parcels B and C. Once combined by a lot line adjustment, the parcel would total 1.94 acres. Parcel B would assume the zoning of the adjacent properties, which would be ARSP, C-R District; however, no additional development density would be assigned to the property. Table 1, Maximum Allowable Development, shows the total amount of development permitted on the project site. EIR 340 analyzed the cumulative development of both the DRSP and ARSP, including the maximum allowable development described in Table 1. The density of the Proposed Project is 174 rooms, which is one room less than the density analyzed in EIR 340. TABLE 1 MAXIMUM ALLOWABLE DEVELOPMENT Parcel Acreage Specific Plan/Zoning Maximum Allowable Density Maximum Allowable Development (hotel rooms) A 1.34 DRSP/C-R Overlay, Medium Density 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater 100 B 0.26 n/a n/a n/a C 0.34 ARSP/C-R District, Low- Medium Density 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater 75 Total 1.94 175 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 2-1 Purpose of the Document SECTION 2.0 PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT This Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 is prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations Sections 15000, et seq.). Section 15164(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines states that “the lead agency or a responsible agency shall prepare an addendum to a previously-certified Environmental Impact Report if some changes or additions are necessary but none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for preparation of a subsequent EIR have occurred”. Pursuant to Section 15162(a) of the State CEQA Guidelines, a subsequent EIR is required when: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. This document is an Addendum to EIR 311 (certified by the City of Anaheim in June 1993) and EIR 340 (certified by the City of Anaheim in December 2012). The purpose of this Addendum is to analyze the differences between the environmental effects associated with the approved DRSP and ARSP, as amended, and the proposed Element Anaheim Hotel Project (Proposed Project). As described in detail herein, an analysis has been conducted that confirms the impacts from the Proposed Project would be no more severe than those projected to result from implementation of the DRSP and ARSP. The anticipated impacts of the Proposed Project would either be the same or less than the anticipated levels associated with the DRSP and ARSP and no new significant Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 2-2 Purpose of the Document impacts would result. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the State CEQA Guidelines, this Addendum to the previously certified EIR 311 and EIR 340 is the appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed Element Anaheim Hotel Project. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 3-1 Project Background SECTION 3.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND The Anaheim Resorttm The Proposed Project is located within the 1,078-acre Anaheim Resort, a portion of the City of Anaheim specially designated by the City's General Plan for recreation and tourist/convention- related activities and supporting uses. The Anaheim Resort is located 35 miles southeast of downtown Los Angeles and seven miles northwest of Santa Ana, in Central Orange County. As shown in Exhibit 1, Specific Plan Boundaries, The Anaheim Resort is located generally west of the I-5 corridor, south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Street, and north of Chapman Avenue and includes three specific plan areas: The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP), Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) and Hotel Circle Specific Plan (HCSP). The Proposed Project is located within areas regulated by the DRSP and the ARSP; it is not within the HCSP. Exhibit 1 shows the Project Site in context to the boundaries of all three of the Specific Plan areas within The Anaheim Resort. Regional access to the Project Site is provided via I-5 and local access is provided via Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Disney Way, and Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street. As shown on Exhibit 1, the Project Site is divided into three separate parcels: Parcel A, Parcel B, and Parcel C. Anaheim General Plan The General Plan land use designation for the Project Site is Commercial-Recreation, which applies to all of The Anaheim Resort. This designation is intended to provide for tourist and entertainment-related uses, such as theme parks, hotels, tourist-oriented retail, restaurants, theaters, and other visitor-serving facilities. This designation is implemented by various Specific Plan districts, which further define the maximum development intensities within this area. Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) The southern portion of the site is within the DRSP, which allows hotel development on this site at a density of 75 rooms per acre or parcel, whichever is greater. The DRSP was adopted in 1993, encompasses approximately 489.7 acres of the Anaheim Resort, and provides for the development of an international vacation destination resort (The Disneyland Resort®) that allows the development of a second theme park (Disney California Adventure), additional hotel and entertainment areas, administrative office facilities, back-of-house facilities, new public and private parking facilities, an internal transportation system, and the on-going modification of Disneyland. EIR 311 was certifed in conjunction with the adoption of the DRSP. The City Council also adopted findings and a statement of overriding considerations, Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 67 and standard Conditions of Approval per Ordinance No. 5377, as last amended by Ordinance No. 6022. At the time the DRSP was adopted, it included four districts: the Theme Park District, the Hotel District, the Parking District, and the Future Expansion District; and, the C-R Overlay. Following the adoption of the DRSP, the document has been modified with eight specific plan amendments and 10 specific plan adjustments. The modifications added District A and the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay. The third amendment was approved in 1996 in conjunction with the approval of Development Agreement No. 96-01 by and between the City of Anaheim and Walt Disney World Company. An addendum to EIR 311 was prepared in conjunction with this request. A Mitigated Negative Declaration (MND) and several addenda were prepared or relied upon as the environmental documentation for Amendments Nos. 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 pertaining to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay. Adjustment No. 6 was processed concurrently with a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan and its related EIR (EIR 330). All other amendments and Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 3-2 Project Background adjustments were found to be either exempt from CEQA or analyzed by EIR 311. Accordingly, all references within this Addendum to the Previously-Approved Project reflect conditions inclusive of all previously-approved amendments and adjustments to the DRSP and EIR 311 includes all additional environmental analysis associated with these amendments. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) The northern portion of the site is within the ARSP, which allows hotel development on this site at a density of 75 rooms per acre or parcel, whichever is greater. The ARSP was adopted in 1994 and provides for the development of hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, including the Anaheim Convention Center, as well as restaurants, retail shops, and entertainment uses. The ARSP is divided into two development areas: the Public Recreation (PR) District, which includes the Anaheim Convention Center and the Anaheim Hilton; and, the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District, which includes the remainder of the ARSP, including the Project Site. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313 (EIR 313) (State Clearinghouse No. 91091062) was certified as the environmental documentation for the adoption of the ARSP. At the time the ARSP was adopted, the specific plan area encompassed approximately 549.5 acres. Since the approval of the ARSP, it has been modified with 14 amendments and eight adjustments, which have increased the total ARSP area to 581.3 acres. Two validation reports were prepared (1999 and 2004) to evaluate the continued relevance and accuracy of EIR 313. In addition, MNDs were prepared for Amendment Nos. 1, 3, 7, 12 and 13. An addendum to the MND prepared for Amendment No. 7 was prepared for Amendment No. 8. Amendment Nos. 4 and 5 were processed concurrently with a comprehensive update to the City’s General Plan and its related EIR (EIR 330). All other amendments and adjustments, with the exception of Amendment No. 14 discussed below, were either exempt from CEQA or used EIR 313 as the environmental documentation for the project. In December 2012, the Anaheim City Council certified Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340 (EIR 340) in support of the approval of the Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Project. EIR 340 reevaluated all of the environmental changes that have occurred in and around The Anaheim Resort since certification of EIR 313 in September 1994. EIR 340 analyzes the cumulative impacts associated with the entire Anaheim Resort and surrounding area, including the development of the three Specific Plans. EIR 340 is a supplemental EIR that reevaluated all the environmental changes that have occurred in and around The Anaheim Resort since certification of EIR 313. EIR 340 also evaluated an expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center and an update of the ARSP document. The Anaheim City Council adopted findings and a statement of overriding considerations; Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C; and, a water supply assessment in conjunction with the certification of EIR 340. Accordingly, all references within this Addendum to the Previously-Approved Project reflect conditions inclusive of all previously-approved amendments and adjustments to the ARSP and EIR 340 includes all additional environmental analysis associated with these amendments. Ball Rd Katella Ave H a r b o r B l v d A n a h e i m B l v d Disney Way §¨¦5 Parcel A Parcel C Parcel B D :\P r o j e c t s \A n a h e i m \J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \M X D \A d d e n d u m \e x _S p e c i f i c P l a n _2 0 1 6 1 2 2 1 .m x d 1,000 0 1,000500 Feet² Specific Plan BoundariesElement Anaheim Hotel Project Exhibit 1 (Rev: 12/21/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex1_SpecificPlan_20161221.pdf Project Boundary Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (SP92-1) Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2) Hotel Circle Specific Plan (SP93-1) Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 3-3 Project Background Other Addenda to EIR 311 and EIR 340 Given that EIR 340 analyzes the cumulative impacts associated with buildout-of the DRSP and the ARSP, other addenda to EIR 311 and EIR 340 have been prepared as the environmental documentation for the following recent development projects within the DRSP.  Country Inn and Suites: 174-room hotel located within the DRSP at 1640 South Clementine Street. The project was approved by the Planning Commission on March 23, 2015.  1700 Harbor: 580-room hotel with meeting rooms, restaurants, retail and spa, located within the DRSP at 1700 South Harbor Boulevard. The project was recommended for approval by the Planning Commission on April 18, 2016 and approved by the City Council on July 12, 2016. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 3-4 Project Background This page intentionally left blank Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 4-1 Project Description SECTION 4.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS The Project site totals 1.94 acres and is comprised of three separate parcels, referred to in this document as Parcel A, B and C (refer to Exhibit 1, Specific Plan Boundaries). As further described below, the project site is located within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (DRSP) and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP). Exhibit 2, Local and Regional Vicinity, depicts the Project Site in both its regional and local context. As shown on Exhibit 3, Aerial Photograph, the Project Site is bordered on the north and east by I-5, and by the newly constructed Country Inn and Suites Hotel on the south and west. Manchester Avenue borders the western edge of Parcel C, and the street name changes to Clementine Street at the intersection of Alro Way and continues south to the west of Parcel A. Existing views of the Project Site are shown from various locations within and surrounding the property (refer to Exhibits 4a through 4c, Site Photographs). . The existing two-story building on Parcel A (formerly Bergstroms Childrens Store) and associated structures and pavement, including the existing reader board pole sign, would be demolished in order to accommodate the Proposed Project. The existing building is a concrete tilt up structure with a loading dock area and is surrounded by paved parking stalls and a driveway. Alro Way (Parcel B) is a cul-de-sac street that provides vehicular access to Parcel A Parcel C is currently a vacant dirt lot. Vegetation on the site in the building area includes landscape areas covered with grasses, shrubs, and small trees, while the vacant dirt lot includes shrubs and trees along the southeasterly end of the property. Other existing site improvements include an asphalt driveway and parking stalls; concrete walkways; concrete gutters; block walls along the easterly, southerly, and westerly property lines; and underground utilities. 4.2 PROPOSED PROJECT IMPROVEMENTS The Applicant proposes to demolish an existing vacant building (formerly Bergstroms Childrens Store) and associated structures and pavement, and construct a five-story, 174-room hotel with one level of subterranean parking. Hotel amenities would include a breakfast room, swimming pool, fitness center, and common areas for hotel guests. A total of 132 on-site parking spaces would be provided in a combination of surface and subterranean parking. The Applicant is requesting deviations from the following Code requirements: approval of a narrower landscape setback along Manchester Avenue, a narrower interior landscape setback, more wall signs, and 12 fewer parking spaces than required by the Code. 4.2.1 HOTEL USE The Proposed Project would involve development of the Project Site with a five-story, 174-room hotel with one level of subterranean parking as depicted on Exhibit 5, Site Plan. Hotel amenities would include a breakfast room, swimming pool, fitness center, and common area for hotel guests, totaling approximately 111,955 square feet (sf). The proposed elevations are depicted in Exhibit 6, Elevations. The five-story building would be a maximum height of 74 feet, including all architectural elements. The elevations would include exterior smooth stucco, mullion storefront aluminum, and metal paneling in a neutral color palette. All roof-mounted equipment would be completely screened by the parapet walls surrounding the roof. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 4-2 Project Description In order to reduce noise intrusion inside the proposed hotel, the hotel windows would be glazed as shown on Exhibit 7, Window Glazing Types. The glazing types would range between Sound Transmission Class (STC) levels of 34 to 43 STC. Type 1 Glazing would provide a minimum of 43 STC, Type 2 Glazing would provide a minimum of 40 STC, Type 3 Glazing would provide a minimum of 37 STC, and Type 4 Glazing would provide a minimum of 34 STC. 4.2.2 LANDSCAPE AND HARDSCAPE The Applicant proposes to install approximately 23,460 sf of landscaped area. The landscaping would include several tree species, including shade, flowering, and specimen trees, as well as a variety of shrubs and groundcovers. As shown on Exhibit 8, Landscape Plan, the Proposed Project would meet the tree density requirements of the DRSP and ARSP. These requirements would be complied with throughout the property, including the areas where the Applicant is requesting a variance for the depth of the landscape setback. There is an existing concrete retaining wall (with chain-link fence atop) that would be maintained along the eastern property line. As shown on Exhibit 9, Sound Wall Locations, a 16-foot solid wall constructed of impervious materials would be constructed around the perimeter of the outdoor recreation and pool area. A parapet sound wall would also be constructed immediately east of the proposed restroom to bring the total height of the restroom’s east wall to 16 feet. Additionally, a semicircular drop-off area is proposed with direct access to the hotel lobby. This drop-off area would be constructed of a combination of colored concrete bands and interlocking concrete pavers. A feature wall with landscaping would separate the drop-off area from the surface parking area. 4.2.3 SIGNS The Applicant proposes to install a total of three walls signs, one each on the north, south and east building elevations. The Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) allows a hotel at a mid-block location to have up to two wall signs on non-adjacent building elevations; therefore, the Applicant is requesting approval of a Variance in order to allow a third wall sign for the hotel. The Applicant is also proposing a monument sign for the hotel that would comply with Code requirements. 4.2.4 PARKING A total of 132 on-site parking spaces would be provided in a combination of surface and subterranean parking. The Anaheim Municipal Code (AMC) requires 144 parking spaces based on the number of hotel rooms and employees; therefore, the Applicant is requesting approval of an Administrative Adjustment in order to allow 12 fewer parking spaces than required by the Code. Deviation of up to ten percent, or up to 15 spaces for this project, qualifies for an Administrative Adjustment. 4.2.5 PROJECT ACCESS AND CIRCULATION Primary vehicular access to the Project Site would be provided via the existing four-way stop controlled intersection of Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street and Alro Way. As described previously, the easterly portion of the Alro Way is proposed to be abandoned and incorporated into the Proposed Project; the westerly portion of Alro Way, from the intersection to the project boundary, would be subject to a street closure. As part of the Proposed Project, the street width would be narrowed to have the appearance of a typical commercial drive approach. The proposed location of the access gate and depth of the entry approach is dependent upon closure of Alro Way and the Applicant will be required to improve and maintain the street closure portion of Alro Way via an Encroachment and Maintenance Agreement. The driveway would provide access to §¨¦5 §¨¦5 W e s t S t B r o a d w a y H a s t e r S t Ball Rd H a r b o r B l v d Katella Ave Disney Way H a r b o r B l v d Anaheim High School Ball Junior High School Paul Revere Elementary School Parkview Elementary School Jefferson II Elementary School Theodore Roosevelt Elem School Crystal Cathedral Academy Thomas Jefferson Elem School Melrose Abbey Memorial Park Boysen Park Poinciana Park Sierra Park Ponderosa Park Pioneer Park Citrus ParkPearson Park Stoddard Park Little Peoples Park Disneyland D :\P r o j e c t s \A n a h e i m \J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \M X D \A d d e n d u m \e x _R L _L V _2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 .m x d 2,000 0 2,0001,000 Feet² li Project Site Anaheim §¨105 §¨5 §¨710§¨110 §¨605 ST19 ST90 ST261 ST142ST72 ST60 ST55 ST57ST91 Los AngelesOrange BeachHuntington Los Angeles Downey Irvine Carson Whittier Lakewood Santa Ana Costa Mesa Buena Park Long Beach West Covina Local and Regional VicinityElement Anaheim Hotel Project Exhibit 2 (Rev: 12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex2_RL_LV_20161219.pdf Project Boundary Element Anaheim Hotel Project Santa Ana Fwy S C l e m e n t i n e S t SManchester A v e W Alro Way WCerritosAve §¨5 D :\P r o j e c t s \A n a h e i m \J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \M X D \A d d e n d u m \e x _A e r i a l _2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 .m x d 100 0 10050 Feet² Source: Esri, NAIP 2014 Project Boundary Aerial Photograph (Rev: 12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex3_Aerial_20161219.pdf Exhibit 3 Site PhotographsElement Anaheim Hotel Project Exhibit 4a (Rev: 12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex4_SP_20161219.pdf D :\P r o j e c t s \A n a h e i m \J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \M X D \A d d e n d u m \e x _S P 1 _2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 .m x d Aerial Source: LAR-IAC 2011Aerial Source: Aerials Express 2009Aerial Source: Google, ______ YYYYAerial Source: ESRI 2014 View from Clementine Street looking southeast toward theproject site. View from roadway between cast lot and USCIS building looking east towardthe project site.   §¨5 2 1 Santa Ana Fwy Site PhotographsElement Anaheim Hotel Project Exhibit 4b (Rev: 12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex4_SP_20161219.pdf D :\P r o j e c t s \A n a h e i m \J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \M X D \A d d e n d u m \e x _S P 2 _2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 .m x d Aerial Source: LAR-IAC 2011Aerial Source: Aerials Express 2009Aerial Source: Google, ______ YYYYAerial Source: ESRI 2014 View from Clementine Street looking northeast toward theproject site. View from the intersection of Disney Way and Clementine Street lookingnortheast toward the project site.   Santa Ana Fwy §¨5 3 4 Site PhotographsElement Anaheim Hotel Project Exhibit 4c (Rev: 12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex4_SP_20161219.pdf D :\P r o j e c t s \A n a h e i m \J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \M X D \A d d e n d u m \e x _S P 3 _2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 .m x d Aerial Source: LAR-IAC 2011Aerial Source: Aerials Express 2009Aerial Source: Google, ______ YYYYAerial Source: ESRI 2014 View from Disney Way looking north toward the project site. View from Disney Way looking northwest toward the project site.  Santa Ana Fwy §¨5 5 6 Element Anaheim Hotel Project D:\ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ M X D \ A d d e n d u m \ e x _ S i t e P l a n _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . m x d 60 0 6030 Feet² Source: Gene Fong Associates 2016 Parcel A Parcel B Parcel C Site Plan (Rev: 12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex5_SitePlan_20161219.pdf Exhibit 5 Elevations Exhibit 6 Element Anaheim Hotel Project (12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\Ex6_Elevations_20161219.pdf D:\ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ G R A P H I C S \ A d d e n d u m \ E x _ E l e v a t i o n s _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . a i Map Not To Scale Source: Gene Fong Associates 2016 Source: Newson Brown Acoustics LLC 2016D: \ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ G R A P H I C S \ A d d e n d u m \ e x _ W i n d o w G l a z i n g T y p e s _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . a i (12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex7_WindowGlazingTypes_20161219.pdf Exhibit 7 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Window Glazing Types Landscape Plan Exhibit 8 Element Anaheim Hotel Project (12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex8_Landscape_20161219.pdf D:\ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ G R A P H I C S \ A d d e n d u m \ E x _ L a n d s c a p e _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . a i 60 30 060 Feet Source: Gene Fong Associates 2016 Source: Newson Brown Acoustics LLC 2016D: \ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ G R A P H I C S \ A d d e n d u m \ e x _ S o u n d W a l l L o c a t i o n s _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . a i (12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex9_SoundWallLocations_20161219.pdf Exhibit 9 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Sound Wall Locations Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 4-3 Project Description surface parking, the guest drop-off area with direct access to the hotel lobby, and the ramp leading to the subterranean parking level, at the southeast corner of the site. Pedestrian access would be provided throughout the Project Site via a series of interconnected sidewalks and pedestrian walkways, allowing access to the hotel facilities, parking areas, and Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street. Pedestrian and bicycle access from areas north (Manchester Avenue) and south (Clementine Street and Disney Way) of the project site would be provided via the proposed driveway along Manchester Avenue at Alro Way. 4.2.6 UTILITIES Existing utility lines are located along Manchester Avenue and extend onto the Project Site via Alro Way. An existing sewer line extends southeast, along the eastern boundary of the Project Site. Existing electrical lines extend from Alro Way to an existing transformer on the east edge of the Project Site. Internal for electrical, gas, sewer, and water lines would connect to the existing facilities and would be sized to accommodate the Proposed Project. 4.2.7 DRAINAGE AND WATER QUALITY FEATURES The Proposed Project includes the installation of an ADS Storm Tech Chamber subsurface infiltration system on Parcel C of the Project Site as shown on Exhibit 10, Drainage Concept. This underground infiltration system would be sized to completely drain the proposed infiltration basin ponding depth within three hours. As shown on Exhibit 10, Drainage Concept storm water would be collected via a series of catch basins and storm drain pipes and, prior to entering the infiltration system, all storm water would be pretreated. 4.3 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS This Addendum, EIR 311, and EIR 340 are intended to serve as the primary environmental documents for all future actions associated with the Proposed Project, including all discretionary approvals requested or required to implement the Proposed Project. In addition, this Addendum is the primary reference document for the formulation and implementation of a mitigation monitoring plan (Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340) for the Proposed Project. All applicable measures from the mitigation and monitoring programs approved in conjunction with EIR 311 and EIR 340 have been incorporated into this document. This document is intended to provide sufficient information to allow the City of Anaheim and any other permitting agencies to evaluate the potential impacts from construction and implementation of the Proposed Project. Potential actions to be considered as part of the Proposed Project include, but are not limited to, the following:  Final Site Plan Review. The Applicant is requesting approval of a Final Site Plan for the Proposed Project to demonstrate compliance with the requirements of the DRSP and ARSP.  Variance. The Applicant is requesting consideration of variances to three Code requirements: 1. Reduction of the minimum landscape setback along Manchester Avenue from 20 feet to a setback that ranges from three feet to 20 feet. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 4-4 Project Description 2. Reduction of the minimum interior landscape setback to the west of the proposed building to allow architectural projections to encroach one to two feet and to allow raised planters to encroach five feet into the required ten-foot setback. 3. Increase the number of wall signs from two permitted to three requested.  Administrative Adjustment. The Applicant is requesting consideration of an Administrative Adjustment to provide 12 fewer parking spaces than required by the Code, within a ten percent deviation, from 144 required to 132 proposed. Street Abandonment, Street Closure, Purchase and Sale Agreement, Lot Line Adjustment, and Encroachment and Maintenance Agreement. The Applicant has requested to purchase Parcel B, once abandoned, and Parcel C from the City. These actions require approval by City Council, with the exception of the administrative lot line adjustment, and are contingent upon the Planning Commission approval of the Proposed Project. Parcels B and C would be incorporated into the Project Site via a lot line adjustment, which would total 1.94 acres once all parcels are combined. Parcel B would assume the zoning of the adjacent properties, which would be ARSP, C-R District; however, no additional development density would be assigned to the property. Source: Gene Fong Associates 2016D: \ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ G R A P H I C S \ A d d e n d u m \ e x _ D r a i n a g e C o n c e p t _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . a i (12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex10_DrainageConcept_20161219.pdf Exhibit 10 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Drainage Concept PLA N T E R P O O L POOL DECK GENE R A T O R T R A S H DROP - OFF SIDEWALK PATIO SID E W A L K SID E W A L K SID E W A L K S I D E W A L K SIDEWALK SIDEWALK SIDEWALK ENTRY R A M P D O W N PL A N T E R PL A N T E R SIDEWALK PLANTER L O A D I N G Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-1 Environmental Analysis SECTION 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This portion of the Addendum examines each environmental topical issue analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. By definition, an addendum to a CEQA document is intended to demonstrate that the modifications/alterations to the previously approved project would not substantially increase environmental impacts or create any new significant impacts. The following analysis documents why and how this conclusion has been made. Because the Proposed Project represents a minor modification to a previously analyzed and approved project, this Addendum does not include an analysis specific to the Mandatory Findings of Significance topic identified in the City of Anaheim Environmental Checklist. As discussed previously, this document is an addendum to both EIR 311 and EIR 340. The northern portion of the Project Site is located in the ARSP, which was previously analyzed by EIR 313, and more recently by EIR 340. The southern portion of the Project Site is located in the DRSP, which was analyzed by EIR 311. The impacts associated with the development of the site were most recently cumulatively analyzed by EIR 340, which analyzed buildout of the entire Anaheim Resort, including properties within the DRSP, ARSP, and HCSP. EIR 340 provided updated analysis of the environmental factors that have changed since the certification of EIR 313, which was prepared for the original adoption of the ARSP. EIR 340 supersedes analysis contained in EIR 313. Therefore, this document incorporates applicable analysis from both EIR 311 and EIR 340 and all applicable mitigation measures from Mitigation and Monitoring Program (MMP) No. 67, approved in conjunction with EIR 311 and Updated and Modified MMP No. 85C, approved in conjunction with EIR 340. It should be noted that, when mitigation from the two mitigation monitoring programs referenced are substantially similar, the newer mitigation measure from MMP No. 85C is included. The mitigation program identified to reduce potential impacts of the Proposed Project consists of Standard Requirements (SRs), Project Design Features (PDF) and Mitigation Measures (MMs). The components of the mitigation program are described below.  Standard Requirements. Existing SRs are based on local, State, or federal regulations or laws that are frequently required independently of CEQA review and also serve to offset or prevent specific impacts. Typical SRs include compliance with the provisions of the California and local Building Codes, South Coast Air Quality Management District Rules, City ordinances, and local agency impact fees, among others.  Conditions of Approval. The DRSP includes standard COAs per Ordinance No. 5377, as last amended by Ordinance No. 6022. The ARSP also included standard Conditions of Approval when it was adopted; however, in conjunction with the certification of EIR 340, all applicable Conditions of Approval were incorporated in to MMP 85C. In the instances that mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to conditions of approval identified by Ordinance No. 6022, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340.  Mitigation Measures. Where a potentially significant environmental effect has been identified and is not reduced to a level considered less than significant through the application of SRs, mitigation measures have been provided. All applicable measures from the mitigation and monitoring programs approved in conjunction with EIR 311 and EIR 340 have been incorporated into this document. In the instances that mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. These mitigation measures have been incorporated into Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340 for Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-2 Environmental Analysis this Addendum. Any modifications to the mitigation measures from EIR 311 and EIR 340 are shown as strikethrough for deleted text and bold for new inserted text. The City may substitute, at its discretion, any mitigation measure (and timing thereof) that has (1) the same or superior result as the original mitigation measures and (2) the same or superior effect on the environment. The City of Anaheim Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent timing” and, if deemed necessary, may refer said determination to the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of equivalency/timing shall be borne by the Property Owner/Developer. 5.1 AESTHETICS 5.1.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 The Visual Resources and Aesthetics analysis for EIR 311 determined that implementation of Specific Plan (SP) 92-1 would have beneficial impacts on the area as a result of the extensive landscaping and design features. However, unavoidable adverse visual impacts were anticipated for property owners immediately adjacent to the West Parking Area and hotel parking facilities along Walnut Street, and potentially the Future Expansion District, even with the implementation of PDF 3.12-1 and PDF 3.5-3 and MM 3.12-1 through 3.12-5. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. No other significant impacts were anticipated. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, the ARSP area does not contain any scenic resources, nor are any scenic vistas visible from the ARSP area; therefore, no impact would occur. Future development and redevelopment associated with buildout of the ARSP area would change the existing visual character of individual areas; however, buildout of the ARSP area would create a more visually cohesive and appealing environment and impacts would be less than significant with implementation of MM 5.1-1 through MM 5.1-14. MM 5.1-1 requires projects under EIR 340 to avoid created significant shade and shadow impacts. MM 5.1-2, MM 5.1-4, MM 5.1-5, and MM 5.1-12 regulate plumbing and lighting fixtures and roof- and ground-mounted equipment. MM 5.1- 3 requires removal of all on-site graffiti throughout project operation. MM 5.1-6 through MM 5.1- 11 relate to trees, landscaping, and irrigation. MM 5.1-13 and MM 5.1-14 set requirements for rear building elevations and vehicular drop-off areas. Buildout of the C-R District could result in potential shade and shadow impacts on properties immediately adjacent to the ARSP area that would be considered significant and unavoidable. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Shade and shadow impacts associated with the specific development proposed for the PR District as evaluated in EIR 340 would be less than significant. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-3 Environmental Analysis 5.1.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic highway? Consistent with the findings of EIR 311 and EIR 340, the Proposed Project Site and surrounding area are located in a highly urbanized area of the City that does not contain any scenic vistas or visual resources and is not visible from any State or local scenic highways. According to the California Scenic Highways Mapping System, the closest designated highway is State Route (SR) 57, which is an Eligible State Scenic Highway – Not Officially Designated and is located approximately two miles east of the Project Site (Caltrans 2016). Based on Figure C-1 of the City’s General Plan Circulation Element, the closest scenic expressway is Santa Ana Canyon Road, located approximately 4.5 miles northeast of the Project Site. As such, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? Implementation of the Project would represent a change to the existing visual conditions of the Project Site through construction of a new five-story hotel on a site that is currently developed with a 30,720-sf building (formerly Bergstrom Children’s Store) and an existing reader board pole sign, both of which will be demolished (Parcel A); an existing cul-de-sac (Parcel B); and a vacant, undeveloped lot (Parcel C). The proposed hotel would serve to visually unify the Project Site with a single use and would be visually consistent with surrounding land uses, including the recently constructed Country Inn and Suites adjacent to the Project Site; the Residence Inn located across Disney Way south of the Project Site; and the multi-story motels and hotels in the surrounding area along Anaheim Boulevard, Disney Way, Harbor Boulevard, and West Manchester Avenue. As noted previously, the Applicant is requesting consideration of three variances: (refer to Section 4.3, Discretionary Actions) a variance for a minimum landscape setback along Manchester Avenue, a minimum interior landscape setback, and an increase in the number of permitted wall signs. Additionally, the Property Owner would be required to participate in The Anaheim Resort Maintenance District, pursuant to MM 3.12-5, which requires participation in a landscape assessment and maintenance district, and will help to ensure implementation of a unified landscape program. The lack of sensitive land uses adjacent to the Project Site would preclude a significant shade or shadow impact on surrounding uses. In compliance with MM 5.1-1 from EIR 340, a shade and shadow analysis was conducted for the Proposed Project. As shown on Exhibit 11, Shade and Shadow Analysis, the proposed structure would cast a shadow on the adjacent Country Inn and Suites building for less than three hours a day during the summer. The Proposed Project would also comply with AMC Section 18.114.100.070, which references Amended Exhibit 1 – “Anaheim Commercial Recreation Area, Maximum Permitted Structural Height Map”. The 74-foot height of the proposed hotel is within the allowable building height of approximately 140 feet. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the Project Site and its surroundings. Potential impacts Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-4 Environmental Analysis would be less than significant. Although a significant impact was not identified, the Project shall comply with previously approved MMs 5.1-2, 5.1-3, and 5.1-6 through 5.1-14 from EIR 340 as identified below. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The Proposed Project would include the installation of new lighting sources as shown in Exhibit 12, Lighting Plan. Consistent with the analysis in Section 2.4.2, Effects Found Not To Be Significant, of EIR 340, the Project Site is currently subject to night lighting associated with the existing buildings, as well as other adjacent land uses in the ARSP and DRSP areas, including light standards and traffic along Manchester Avenue, Clementine Street and Alro Way. The Project Site is also located adjacent to the I-5 off-ramp and is subject to night lighting from vehicle headlights. The Proposed Project would comply with the lighting specifications outlined in the DRSP and ARSP. Therefore, consistent with the conclusions in EIR 340, the continuation of nighttime illumination features would not represent a new, significant impact with regard to lighting or glare. Although a significant impact was not identified, the project shall comply with previously approved MM 5.1-4 from EIR 340 as identified below. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the aesthetics analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. MM 5.1-2 Prior to issuance of building permits, all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of the building shall be shown on plans as fully screened from view of adjacent public rights-of-way and from adjacent properties by architectural devices and/or appropriate building materials. A note indicating that these improvements will be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Source: Gene Fong Associates 2016D: \ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ G R A P H I C S \ A d d e n d u m \ e x _ S h a d e A n d S h a d o w A n a l y s i s _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . a i (12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex11_ShadeAndShadowAnalysis_20161219.pdf Exhibit 11 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Shade and Shadow Analysis Summer Winter Country Inn & Suites Proposed Project Country Inn & Suites Proposed Project Country Inn & Suites Proposed Project Country Inn & Suites Proposed Project Country Inn & Suites Proposed Project Country Inn & Suites Proposed Project Country Inn & Suites Proposed Project Source: Gene Fong Associates 2016D: \ P r o j e c t s \ A n a h e i m \ J 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ G R A P H I C S \ A d d e n d u m \ e x _ L i g h t i n g P l a n _ 2 0 1 6 1 2 1 9 . a i (12/19/2016 JAZ) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Graphics\Addendum\ex12_LightingPlan_20161219.pdf Exhibit 12 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Lighting Plan 1 3 Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-5 Environmental Analysis MM 5.1-3 Ongoing, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for the removal of any on-site graffiti within 24 hours of its application. MM 5.1-4 Prior to Final Site Plan approval, the location and configuration of all lighting fixtures including ground-mounted lighting fixtures utilized to accent buildings, landscape elements, or to illuminate pedestrian areas shall be shown on all Final Site Plans. All proposed surface parking area lighting fixtures shall be down-lighted with a maximum height of twelve (12) feet adjacent to any residential properties. All lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighting toward the area to be illuminated and away from adjacent residential property lines. MM 5.1-6 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, root and sidewalk barriers shall be provided for trees within seven feet of public sidewalks. MM 5.1-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning Department a letter from a licensed landscape architect certifying that all landscaping and irrigation systems have been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approved in connection with the Final Site Plan. MM 5.1-8 Ongoing, all on-site non-Public Realm, landscaping and irrigation systems, and Public Realm landscaping and irrigation systems, within area in which dedication has not been accepted by the City, shall be maintained by the property owner/developer, in compliance with City standards. MM 5.1-9 Ongoing, any tree planted within the Setback Realm shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. MM 5.1-10 Ongoing, a licensed arborist shall be hired by the property owner/developer to be responsible for all tree trimming. MM 5.1-11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous payment, a fee for street tree purposes shall be paid or cause to be paid to the City of Anaheim based on the length of street frontage in an amount as established by City Council resolution or credit against the fee given for City authorized improvements installed by the property owner/developer. MM 5.1-12 Prior to issuance of each building permit, all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground-mounted equipment shall be shown on plans as shielded from public view and the sound buffered to comply with City of Anaheim noise ordinances from any adjacent residential or transient-occupied properties. A note indicating that these improvements shall be installed prior to final building and zoning inspections shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. MM 5.1-13 Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that the rear elevations of buildings visible from off-site areas shall be architecturally accented to portray a finished look. MM 5.1-14 Prior to Final Site Plan approval, plans shall show that no shuttle/bus/vehicular drop-off areas shall be permitted in hotel/motel or vacation resort front setback area. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-6 Environmental Analysis The following conditions of approval and mitigation measure from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 67 was adopted in connection with EIR 311. These measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. COA 4 That the roadway lighting of all public streets shall be designed in accordance with the Anaheim Resort Identity Program and associated construction specifications. Private streets within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area, with the exception of those within the Hotel and Theme Park Districts, shall have street lights designed and installed in accordance with the Anaheim Resort Identity Program. That the property owner/developer shall pay or cause to be paid all costs associated with replacing the existing City street light system within the public right of way adjacent to or within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area with street lights designed in accordance with the Anaheim Resort Identity Program. COA 19 That with the exception of landscaped areas in the theme parks, prior to final building and zoning inspections, a licensed landscape architect shall certify to the Planning Department that all landscaping has been installed in accordance with landscaping plans approve by the City and on file with the Building Division of the Planning Department. COA 31 That prior to final building and zoning inspections, all air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground mounted equipment shall be shielded from public view as required by the Specific Plan and the sound buffered to comply with City of Anaheim noise ordinances from any adjacent residential or transient occupied properties. Such information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. COA 32 That except within the Theme Park District, prior to final building and zoning inspections, all plumbing or other similar pipes and fixtures located on the exterior of the building shall be fully screened from view of adjacent public rights‐of‐way and from adjacent properties by architectural devices and/or appropriate building materials; and, further, such information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. COA 33 That property owner/developer shall be responsible for the removal of any on‐site graffiti within 24 hours of its application. COA 34 That the location and configuration of all lighting fixtures including ground‐mounted lighting fixtures utilized to accent buildings, landscape elements, or to illuminate pedestrian areas in the Hotel District, Parking District and development in the C‐R Area and in District A, shall be shown on all Final Site Plans. All proposed surface parking area lighting fixtures shall be down‐lighted with a maximum height of twelve (12) feet adjacent to any residential properties. All lighting fixtures shall be shielded to direct lighting toward the area to be illuminated and away from adjacent residential property lines. All lighting fixtures, types and locations shall be identified on the plans submitted for building permits. COA 41 That trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the Department of Maintenance and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Such information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-7 Environmental Analysis MM 3.12-2 The property owner/developer shall submit plans which illustrate that all mechanical equipment and trash areas for the subject buildings will be screened from adjacent public streets and adjacent residential areas. MM 3.12-3 The property owner shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan for areas outside of the theme parks. This plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall include a phasing plan for the installation and maintenance of landscaping associated with that building permit. MM 3.12-5 The applicant shall participate in a landscape assessment and maintenance district, if one is established for the City of Anaheim’s Commercial Recreation Area. 5.2 AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES 5.2.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 Agricultural Resources were addressed in the Land Use and Related Plan and Policies section of EIR 311. The loss of approximately 24 acres of land designated prime agricultural land was considered a significant and unavoidable adverse impact. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. EIR 311 does not specifically address forest resources. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 As disclosed in EIR 340, in 1994 the ARSP area contained an approximate 56-acre site located southeast of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue which was designated as “Prime Farmland” and which was under a Williamson Act contract set to expire on March 1, 2000. EIR 313 evaluated the loss of the prime agricultural land and identified the impact as significant and unavoidable. Because the impact related to the loss of agricultural land was fully analyzed as part of EIR 313, EIR 340 identified that a new significant impact related to agricultural resources would not occur. Additionally, no land within the ARSP area was found to be under a Williamson Act contract; therefore, implementation of the ARSP would not conflict with a standing Williamson Act contract. In addition, EIR 340 states that there are no zoned or existing forest lands or timberland as defined in Public Resources Code (Section 12220[g] and 4526, respectively), in the ARSP area. Therefore, the project evaluated in EIR 340 would not result in the conversion of forest land or timberland. Additionally, forest resources were not identified on the Initial Study checklist prepared for EIR 340, as the checklist was updated by the State after circulation of the Initial Study. 5.2.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-8 Environmental Analysis Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Data from the State of California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, indicates that the Proposed Project Site is designated “Urban and Built-Up Land” and does not contain land that is designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance (FMMP 2014), nor does it have any land that is zoned for agricultural use. In addition, the Proposed Project Site is not in agricultural use nor is it under Williamson Act contracts and no such designated land is nearby. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to agricultural resources. Since the Proposed Project Site is in an urban area, no changes would result in conversion of farm or forest land to non-agricultural or non-forest uses. The Proposed Project Site is not considered to be farmland of significance or land in agricultural use. The Proposed Project Site is not defined as forest land according to Section 12220(g) of the California Public Resources Code, which defines forest land as “land that can support ten percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits”, nor is it zoned for Timberland Production as defined by Section 51104(g) of the California Government Code. The Proposed Project would involve redevelopment of a developed site, consistent with the development areas as previously evaluated and approved for the Project Site. Therefore, no new impacts related to agricultural and forest resources would occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the agriculture and forest resources analysis provided in and EIR 340. Mitigation No mitigation measures are required. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-9 Environmental Analysis 5.3 AIR QUALITY 5.3.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 concluded that, with implementation of MMs 3.4-1 through MM 3.4-6, MM 3.8-4 through MM 3.8-6, and adherence to PDF 3.4-2 through 3.4-8, increases in emissions resulting from construction-related activities related to implementation of the DRSP would not result in a significant adverse impact on a cumulative basis. Similarly, stationary sources and utilities would not contribute to adverse impacts on a cumulative basis after offsetting pursuant to SCAQMD regulations. In addition, local air quality impacts would not result in a significant adverse local carbon monoxide impact on a project or cumulative basis. However, the increase in emissions from vehicle trips associated with the project, without mitigation, would contribute to a significant impact on a cumulative basis. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 EIR 340 concluded that, with implementation of MM 5.2-1 through MM 5.2-7, mass emissions resulting from construction-related activities would be less than significant. These mitigation measures require proof of compliance with SCAQMD regulations; submission of Demolition and Import/Export plans; implementation of measures to reduce emissions and construction- and operation-related air quality impacts; and preparation of a human health risk assessment. However, because of uncertainties in the timing and magnitude of emissions for possible projects, it was concluded that cumulative emissions from construction would be significant and unavoidable. It was also concluded that local concentrations of particulate matter with a diameter of ten microns or less (PM10) and fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less (PM2.5) would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) CEQA significance thresholds for short-term periods when excavation would occur near sensitive receptors; the impact would be significant and unavoidable. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Emissions of criteria pollutants resulting from operation of the full buildout of the ARSP would exceed the SCAQMD applicable thresholds for volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), PM10, and PM2.5. Operation would result in direct and cumulative significant and unavoidable impacts. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential impacts. Because implementation of the ARSP could result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, EIR 340 concluded that the ARSP could conflict with or obstruct implementation of the 2007 AQMP, thereby resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Construction and operation of the ARSP would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant toxic air contaminants (TACs); would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial CO local concentrations; and would not create objectionable odors. These impacts would be less than significant. 5.3.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on Appendix B, City of Anaheim – Element Hotel Project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum (Air Quality and GHG Report), prepared for the Proposed Project by Vista Environmental (2016a). Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-10 Environmental Analysis Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? Air quality in Orange County is regulated by the SCAQMD, which is the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the South Coast Air Basin (SoCAB). The SCAQMD develops rules and regulations; establishes permitting requirements for stationary sources; inspects emissions sources; and enforces such measures through educational programs or fines, when necessary. The SCAQMD is directly responsible for reducing emissions from stationary (area and point), mobile, and indirect sources. It has responded to this requirement by preparing a sequence of Air Quality Management Plans (AQMPs). On December 7, 2012, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the 2012 AQMP1, which is a regional and multiagency effort (SCAQMD, California Air Resources Board [CARB], the Southern California Association of Governments [SCAG], and U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [USEPA]). The purpose of the 2012 AQMP is to set forth a comprehensive program that will lead the region into compliance with federal air quality standards for eight-hour ozone (O3) and fine particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter (PM2.5). The 2012 AQMP incorporates the latest scientific and technical information and planning assumptions, including the 2012 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy (RTP/SCS), updated emission inventory methodologies for various source categories, and SCAG’s latest growth forecasts. On December 20, 2012, the 2012 AQMP was submitted to CARB and the USEPA for concurrent review and approval for inclusion in the State Implementation Plan (SIP) (SCAQMD 2013b). The 2012 AQMP was approved by CARB on January 25, 2013 (CARB 2014). The two principal criteria for conformance to an AQMP are: 1. Whether the project would result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations; cause or contribute to new violations; or delay timely attainment of air quality standards; and 2. Whether the project would exceed the assumptions in the AQMP. With respect to the first criterion, the analyses in responses to 5.3(b) and 5.3(c) below demonstrate that the Proposed Project would not generate short-term or long-term emissions of criteria pollutants that could potentially cause an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations; cause or contribute to new violations; or delay timely attainment of air quality standards beyond those impacts considered in EIR 311 and EIR 340. With respect to the second criterion, the Proposed Project would not increase or modify SCAG’s population, housing, or employment projections beyond what was already anticipated for the area with approval of DRSP and ARSP and certification of EIR 311 and EIR 340, respectively. Therefore, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the region’s AQMP. No impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. There will be no new significant impacts or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. 1 The Draft 2016 AQMP has been released and is expected to be adopted in early 2017. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-11 Environmental Analysis b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? The Proposed Project would not violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The following sections calculate the potential air emissions associated with the construction and operations of the Proposed Project and compares the emissions to the SCAQMD standards. To estimate if the Proposed Project may adversely affect the air quality in the region, the SCAQMD has prepared the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD 1993) to provide guidance to those who analyze the air quality impacts of Proposed Projects. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that any project in the SoCAB with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. For the purposes of this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds. Project-related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SoCAB. In order to assess local air quality impacts, the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significance Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project-related air emissions in the project vicinity. SCAQMD (2009) has also developed the Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The LST Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are nitrogen dioxide (NO2), carbon monoxide (CO), respirable particulate matter less than ten micrometers in diameter (PM10), and PM2.5. The LST Methodology provides look-up tables with different thresholds based on the location and size of the Project Site and distance to the nearest sensitive receptors. The Project Site is approximately 1.94 acres; therefore, the two-acre project site in the look-up tables was used for this analysis. The Project Site is located in Air Monitoring Area 17, which covers central Orange County. The nearest sensitive receptors are mobile homes located less than 500 feet (152 meters) north of the Project Site, across the I-5 freeway. Additionally, the Country Inn & Suites hotel rooms, which are currently under construction, are located 85 feet (26 meters) south of the Project Site. It should be noted that hotel rooms are a commercial use and are not normally considered as sensitive receptors, however, in order to provide a conservative analysis, they have been analyzed as the nearest sensitive receptors. Short-term Construction-Related Impacts Regional Impacts The worst-case summer or winter daily construction-related criteria pollutant emissions from the Proposed Project for each phase of construction activities are shown below in Table 2, Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently, Table 2, Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions, also shows the combined criteria pollutant emissions from the building construction, paving, and architectural coating phases of construction. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-12 Environmental Analysis TABLE 2 CONSTRUCTION-RELATED REGIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Demolitiona On Site 2.39 23.50 19.70 0.02 2.38 1.43 Off Site 0.29 3.44 3.82 0.01 0.45 0.16 Total 2.68 26.94 23.52 0.03 2.83 1.59 Grading On Site 2.37 24.61 17.72 0.02 3.93 2.55 Off Site 1.40 19.84 17.85 0.06 1.85 0.71 Total 3.77 44.45 35.57 0.08 5.78 3.26 Building Construction On Site 2.90 20.56 15.66 0.02 1.25 1.20 Off Site 0.45 2.34 6.36 0.02 0.99 0.29 Total 3.35 22.90 22.02 0.04 2.24 1.49 Paving On Site 1.28 12.41 11.70 0.02 0.72 0.67 Off Site 0.05 0.06 0.74 0.00 0.17 0.05 Total 1.33 12.47 12.44 0.02 0.89 0.72 Architectural Coatings On Site 32.35 1.84 1.84 0.00 0.13 0.13 Off Site 0.04 0.06 0.69 0.00 0.16 0.04 Total 32.39 1.90 2.53 0.00 0.29 0.17 Combined Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coatings 37.07 37.27 36.99 0.06 3.42 2.38 SCAQMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No VOC: volatile organic compound(s); NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; SO2: sulfur dioxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. a Demolition and grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. Source: Vista Environmental 2016a. As shown, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the Proposed Project. Local Impacts Construction-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SoCAB. Table 3, Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, shows the on-site emissions for the different construction phases. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently, Table 3, Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, also shows the combined local criteria pollutant emissions from the building construction, paving, and architectural coating phases of construction. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-13 Environmental Analysis TABLE 3 CONSTRUCTION-RELATED LOCAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Phase Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolitiona 23.50 19.70 2.38 1.43 Gradinga 24.61 17.72 3.93 2.55 Building Construction 20.56 15.66 1.25 1.20 Paving 12.41 11.70 0.72 0.67 Architectural Coatings 1.84 1.84 0.13 0.13 Combined Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coatings 34.81 29.20 2.10 2.00 SCAQMD Thresholds for 25 meters (82 feet)b 115 715 6 4 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. a Demolition and grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. b The 25-meter threshold was utilized in this analysis, since the nearest sensitive receptors are hotel rooms located 85 feet (26 meters) south of the Project Site. Source: Vista Environmental 2016a. As shown, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds for any phase of construction. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the Proposed Project. Operational Emissions Ongoing operation of the Proposed Project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the Project-generated vehicle trips and through operational emissions from the ongoing use of the Proposed Project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the ongoing operations of the Proposed Project. The potential operations-related air emissions have been analyzed below for the regional and local criteria pollutant emissions and cumulative impacts. Regional Impacts The worst-case summer or winter volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen oxides (NOx), CO, sulfur dioxide (SO2), PM10, and PM2.5 daily emissions created from the Proposed Project’s long- term operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table 4, Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-14 Environmental Analysis TABLE 4 OPERATIONAL REGIONAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS Activity Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sourcesa 4.16 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usageb 0.09 0.85 0.71 0.01 0.06 0.06 Mobile Sourcesc 4.09 9.92 39.59 0.11 7.36 2.06 Total Emissions 8.34 10.77 40.33 0.12 7.42 2.12 SCAQMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No VOC: volatile organic compound(s); NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; SO2: sulfur dioxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. a Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. b Energy usage consists of emissions from natural gas usage. c Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. Source: Vista Environmental 2016a. As shown, none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the Proposed Project. Local Impacts Project-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SoCAB. The Proposed Project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project-generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on-site operations. The following analysis evaluates the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from on-site operations. Local Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and federal CO standards of 20 parts per million (ppm) over one hour or nine ppm over eight hours. At the time of the 1993 Handbook, the SoCAB was designated nonattainment under the California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) for CO. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the SoCAB and in the State have steadily declined. In 2007, the SoCAB was designated in attainment for CO under both the CAAQS and NAAQS. SCAQMD conducted a CO hotspot analysis for attainment at the busiest intersections in Los Angeles during the peak morning and afternoon periods and did not predict Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-15 Environmental Analysis a violation of CO standards.2 Since the nearby intersections to the Proposed Project are much smaller, with less traffic than what was analyzed by the SCAQMD, no local CO hotspots are anticipated to be created from the Proposed Project and no CO hotspot modeling was performed. Therefore, a less than significant long-term air quality impact to local air quality is anticipated with the ongoing use of the Proposed Project. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from On-Site Operations Project-related air emissions from on-site sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and natural gas appliances have the potential to create emissions areas that exceed the State and federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the SoCAB. The local air quality emissions from on-site operations were analyzed using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate LST Look-Up Tables. Table 5, Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, shows the on-site emissions from the California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) that includes area sources, energy usage, and vehicles operating on site and the calculated emissions thresholds. TABLE 5 OPERATIONS-RELATED LOCAL CRITERIA POLLUTANT EMISSIONS On-Site Emission Source Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.85 0.71 0.06 0.06 Onsite Vehicle Emissionsa 1.24 4.95 0.92 0.26 Total Emissions 2.09 5.69 0.98 0.32 SCAQMD Thresholds for 25 meters (82 feet)b 115 715 2 1 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No NOx: nitrogen oxides; CO: carbon monoxide; PM10: respirable particulate matter less than 10 micrometers in diameter; PM2.5: fine particulate matter less than 2.5 micrometers in diameter; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. a On-site vehicle emissions are based on 1/8 of the gross vehicular emissions, which is the estimated portion of vehicle emissions occurring within a ¼ mile of the Project Site. b The 25-meter threshold was used in this analysis, since the nearest sensitive receptors are hotel rooms located 85 feet (26 meters) south of the Project Site. Source: Vista Environmental 2016a. As shown, ongoing operations of the Proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above. Therefore, the ongoing operations of the Proposed Project would create a less than significant operations-related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions and no mitigation would be required. As identified previously, EIR 311 concluded that implementation of the DRSP and cumulative operational air quality emissions would be significant and unavoidable. Additionally, EIR 340 concluded that buildout of the ARSP would result in construction and operational air quality emissions that would be significant and unavoidable. However, as shown, the Proposed Project would not result in a significant air quality impact. MMs 5.2-1 through 5.2-7, which identify 2 The four intersections analyzed by the SCAQMD were Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway, Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue, Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue, and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard. The busiest intersection evaluated (Wilshire and Veteran) had a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day with Level of Service (LOS) E in the morning and LOS F in the evening peak hour. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-16 Environmental Analysis measures to reduce construction-related emissions, would continue to be applicable and are incorporated into the Proposed Project. The project would also adhere to SR 5.2-1 and 5.2-2 to control construction-related emissions. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in an increase in regional construction or operational emissions when compared to the previous analyses. The Proposed Project would not result in any new impacts related to air quality standards or existing or projected air quality violations, nor would it result in an increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts compared to those identified in EIR 311 and EIR 340. c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? Construction-Related Impacts The Project Site is located in the SoCAB, which is currently designated by the USEPA for federal standards as a nonattainment area for ozone and PM2.5 and by CARB for the State standards as a nonattainment area for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. The regional ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions associated with construction of the Proposed Project have been calculated above in Table 2, Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions. The above analysis found that development of the Proposed Project would result in less than significant regional emissions of VOC and NOx (ozone precursors), PM10, and PM2.5 during construction of the Proposed Project. Therefore, a less than significant cumulative impact would occur from construction of the Proposed Project. Operational-Related Impacts The greatest cumulative operational impact on the air quality to the SoCAB will be the incremental addition of pollutants from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed SCAQMD criteria or that can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The regional ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions created from the ongoing operations of the Proposed Project have been calculated above in Table 4, Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions. The analysis included for Threshold “b”, above, found that development of the Proposed Project would result in less than significant regional emissions of VOC and NOx (ozone precursors), PM10, and PM2.5 during operation of the Proposed Project. With respect to long-term emissions, this project would create a less than significant cumulative impact. Consistency with Air Quality Plans As discussed previously, the Proposed Project is consistent with the current land use designation and zoning and would not require a General Plan Amendment or zone change. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designations with respect to the regional forecasts utilized by the AQMPs. Cumulative Health Impacts The SoCAB is designated as nonattainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, which means that the background levels of those pollutants are, at times, higher than the ambient air quality standards. The air quality standards were set to protect public health, including the health of sensitive Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-17 Environmental Analysis individuals (the elderly, children, and the sick). Therefore, when the concentrations of those pollutants exceed the standard, it is likely that some sensitive individuals in the population would experience health effects. The regional analysis detailed above found that the Proposed Project would not exceed the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for VOC and NOx (ozone precursors), PM10, and PM2.5. As such, the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant cumulative health impact. The Proposed Project would not result in any new cumulatively considerable emissions increases or new cumulative air quality impacts, nor would it result in an increase in the severity of any previously identified significant impacts compared to those identified in EIR 311 and EIR 340. d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? The local concentrations of criteria pollutant emissions produced in the nearby vicinity of the Proposed Project, which may expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations, have been calculated above in Tables 3, Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, and 5, Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, for both construction and operation. The discussion below also includes an analysis of the potential impacts from toxic air contaminant emissions. The nearest off-site sensitive receptors are mobile homes located less than 500 feet north of the Project Site. In addition, the Country Inn & Suites is located 85 feet south and west of the Project Site; however, it should be noted that hotel rooms are a commercial use and are not normally considered as sensitive receptors. Construction-Related Impacts Construction of the Proposed Project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of localized criteria pollutant concentrations and from toxic air contaminant emissions created from on-site construction equipment, which are described below. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts The local air quality impacts from construction of the Proposed Project were analyzed in Table 3, Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, and found that the construction of the Proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 thresholds of significance. Therefore, construction of the Proposed Project would create a less than significant construction-related impact to local air quality and no mitigation would be required. Toxic Air Contaminants Impacts The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the Proposed Project. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of “individual cancer risk”. Individual cancer risk is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk-assessment methodology. Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment and the short-term construction schedule, the Proposed Project would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70 years) substantial source of toxic air contaminant emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. In addition, California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Section 2449 regulates emissions from off- road diesel equipment in California. This regulation limits idling of equipment to no more than five minutes and requires equipment operators to label each piece of equipment and provide annual reports to CARB of their fleet’s usage and emissions. This regulation also requires systematic upgrading of the emission tier level of each fleet, and, currently, no commercial operator is allowed Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-18 Environmental Analysis to purchase Tier 0 or Tier 1 equipment and, by January 2023, no commercial operator is allowed to purchase Tier 2 equipment. In addition to the purchase restrictions, equipment operators need to meet fleet average emissions targets that become more stringent each year between years 2014 and 2023. Therefore, no significant short-term toxic air contaminant impacts would occur during construction of the Proposed Project. As such, construction of the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Operations-Related Impacts The ongoing operations of the Proposed Project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of local CO emission impacts from the project-generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on-site operations. The following analyzes vehicular CO emissions, local criteria pollutant impacts from on-site operations, and toxic air contaminant impacts. Local Carbon Monoxide Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicle Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential impacts to sensitive receptors. As discussed previously under Threshold “b”, no local CO hotspots are anticipated to be created at any nearby intersections from the vehicle traffic generated by the Proposed Project. Therefore, operation of the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant exposure of off-site sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts The local air quality impacts from the operation of the Proposed Project would occur from on-site sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and natural gas appliances. The analysis provided above in Table 5, Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions, found that the operation of the Proposed Project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5 thresholds of significance Therefore, the ongoing operations of the Proposed Project would create a less than significant operations-related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions and no mitigation would be required. Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Particulate matter (PM) from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by CARB, about 80 percent of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde, have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. Due to the nominal number of diesel truck trips generated by the Proposed Project, a less than significant toxic air contaminant impact would occur during the ongoing operations of the Proposed Project and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, operation of the Proposed Project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-19 Environmental Analysis e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? According to the CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD 1993) and as noted in EIR 340, land uses associated with odor complaints typically include agricultural uses, sewer treatment plants, food processing plants, chemical plants, composting, refineries, landfills, dairies, and fiberglass molding. The Proposed Project does not include any uses identified by the SCAQMD as being associated with odors and therefore would not produce objectionable odors. As such, the Proposed Project would have no impact related to objectionable odors. This would be consistent with what was identified in EIR 340; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the air quality analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirements and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following standards and measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.2-1 Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence of compliance to the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager that all construction activities shall comply with SCAQMD Rules 402 and 403, which shall assist in reducing short term air pollutant emissions. SCAQMD Rule 402 requires that air pollutant emissions not be a nuisance off site. SCAQMD Rule 403 (Tables 1, 2, and 3 of Rule 403) requires that fugitive dust be controlled with the best available control measures so that the presence of such dust does not remain visible in the atmosphere beyond the property line of the emission source. This requirement shall be included as notes on the contractor specifications. SR 5.2-2 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide notes on the contractor specifications indicating that all architectural coatings shall be selected so that the VOC content of the coatings is compliant with SCAQMD Rule 1113. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-20 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures MM 5.2-1 Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce emissions to the extent practical, schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours, and use clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as practicable. MM 5.2-2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with SCAQMD regulations. The information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. The property owner/developer shall submit an architectural coating schedule and calculations demonstrating that VOC emissions from architectural coating operations would not exceed 75 pounds per day averaged over biweekly periods. The calculations shall show, for each coating, the surface area to be coated, gallons (or liters) of coating per unit surface area, and VOC content per gallon (or liter). The property owner/developer shall also implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage: a. Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate; b. Use solvent based coatings, where they are necessary. MM 5.2-3 Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce construction-related air quality impacts. These measures shall include, but are not limited to: a. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable. b. For projects where there is excavation for subterranean facilities (such as parking) on-site haul roads shall be watered at least every two hours or the on-site haul roads shall be paved. c. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil binders, according to manufacturer’s specification, to exposed piles. d. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported from the project site occur. e. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. f. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be covered prior to entering public streets. g. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on tires onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas. h. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-21 Environmental Analysis i. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. j. Reduce Traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less. k. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts. l. Comply with SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. m. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers, dozers, etc.) where practicable. n. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. o. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned. p. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable. MM 5.2-4 Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on project site. MM 5.2-5 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning Department. MM 5.2-6 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall implement, and demonstrate to the City, measures that are being taken to reduce operation-related air quality impacts. These measures may include, but are not limited to the following: 1. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors. 2. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances. 3. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in building design, such as appropriate passive solar design. 4. Use drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy used in pumping and transporting water. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-22 Environmental Analysis 5. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or participate in a joint development daycare center 6. Install facilities for electric vehicle recharging, unless it is demonstrated that the technology for these facilities or availability of the equipment current at the time makes this installation infeasible. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. 5.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 5.4.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 The Notice of Preparation/Initial Study written for the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (included as Appendix A of EIR 311) notes that there were no significant biological resources within the project site at the time of scoping. Therefore, EIR 311 does not specifically address biological resources. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 EIR 340 identified that the ARSP area is located within an urbanized area of the City with no candidate, sensitive, or special status species as listed in local regional plans, policies, or regulations, or as designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife3 (CDFW) or the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). However, MM 5.3-1 and MM 5.3-2 were identified to reduce potential impacts to nesting birds and raptors to less than significant levels. MM 5.3.-1 requires raptor nest surveys and MM 5.3-2 requires a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal. Further, EIR 340 concluded that the ARSP area does not function as a migratory corridor or a native wildlife nursery site and no impact would occur. 5.4.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on the Appendix C, Biological Resources Analysis for the Anaheim Element Hotel Project in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (Biological Resources Memo) prepared for the Proposed Project by Psomas (2016). Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife or US Fish and Wildlife Services? 3 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is previously known, and referred to in EIR 340, as the California Department of Fish and Game (CDFG). Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-23 Environmental Analysis c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? A literature review and records search was conducted to identify special status plants, wildlife, and habitats that have been reported to occur in the vicinity of the Project Site. Following the literature review, a general walk-over survey of the Project Site was conducted on October 18, 2016. According to the results of the survey, the Project Site is composed of bare ground, developed areas, and landscaping. Ornamental plants observed on the Project Site include species such as Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), ornamental rose (Rosa sp.), India hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis indica), bottlebrush (Callistemon sp.), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), pine (Pinus sp.), and gum tree (Eucalyptus sp.). Weedy species, such as cheeseweed (Malva parviflora) and common sow thistle (Sonchus oleraceus), were also present. No natural vegetation communities are present on the Project Site, and most plant species observed are not native to the region. Given the degree of surrounding urban development and lack of connectivity to natural open space areas, only urban-tolerant wildlife species are expected to occur on the Project Site; rock pigeon (Columba livia) and Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) burrows were observed. No special status vegetation types; federally and/or State-listed Threatened, Endangered, Rare, or candidate species; or non-listed special status plant or wildlife species were observed during the walk-over survey. Due to the lack of suitable habitat for these species on the Project Site and consistent with the findings of EIR 340, no special status plants or wildlife species are expected to occur on the Project Site. Therefore, there would be no impact on these species and no mitigation would be required. Drainages, which may include wetlands and “waters of the U.S.”, are protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). According to the results of the survey and consistent with the findings of EIR 340, the Project Site does not support any potential jurisdictional resources. Consistent with the findings of EIR 340, no special status plant or wildlife species are expected to occur on the site due to the lack of suitable habitat; there are no sensitive biological resources on the Proposed Project Site due to the urban nature of the site and surrounding area. Specifically, the Proposed Project would not create impacts related to habitat modification, effects on riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities, federally protected wetlands, migratory wildlife corridors, or native wildlife nursery sites. The Proposed Project is not located in an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan (HCP), Natural Community Conservation Plan (NCCP), or other approved local, regional, or State HCP; therefore, project implementation would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP or NCCP since no habitat, wetlands, or corridors are present on the Proposed Project Site or nearby. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-24 Environmental Analysis Consistent with the findings of EIR 340, the Proposed Project Site contains ornamental trees that may have the potential to be used by nesting birds, including raptors. State regulations (California Fish and Game Code, Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513) prohibit activities that “take, possess or destroy” any raptor nest or egg. Therefore, if construction is initiated during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30), implementation of the Proposed Project has the potential to impact nesting raptors, thus resulting in a significant impact, as noted in EIR 340. This impact would be reduced to a level considered less than significant with implementation of MM 5.3-1 from EIR 340. In addition, ornamental vegetation on the Proposed Project Site has the potential to support nesting birds. Pursuant to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA) and consistent with the findings of EIR 340, disturbance of nesting birds would represent a significant impact; therefore, implementation of the Proposed Project has the potential to impact nesting birds that are protected by the MBTA. This impact would be reduced to a level considered less than significant with implementation of MM 5.3-2 from EIR 340, which requires avoidance of nesting birds throughout the nesting season (typically March 1 through July 31). The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the biological resources analysis provided in EIR 340. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. MM 5.3-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning Department 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-25 Environmental Analysis MM 5.3-2 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning Department, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees/shrubs which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist. 5.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES 5.5.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 concluded that no impacts to cultural, historic, or prehistoric resources were expected to occur from development of the DRSP. However, implementation of the MM 3.13-1 and MM 3.13- 2, which require evidence that an archaeologist and a paleontologist have been hired for the proposed project, would ensure that if any cultural resources were unexpectedly discovered during grading or development of the project, potential impacts would be mitigated to a level considered less than significant. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, no designated historical resources exist within the ARSP area; however, implementation of MM 5.4-3, which requires evidence that any structures aged 45 years or older are not eligible for historical designation would preclude any impacts to unknown historical resources. Further, no resources are anticipated to be discovered in the ARSP area; however, implementation of MM 5.4-1 and MM 5.4-2, which require evidence that an archaeologist and a paleontologist have been hired for the proposed project, would mitigate the potential for disturbing unidentified significant cultural resources. EIR 340 concluded that there is no evidence of Native American human remains in the ARSP area and that adherence to Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code and California Health and Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code would ensure that a significant impact would not occur. 5.5.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and/or identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (July 20, 1999)? The Proposed Project includes demolition of the current building on the site (formerly Bergstrom Children’s Store) and construct a five-story, 174-room hotel in a fully developed and urbanized area. As noted in EIR 311 and EIR 340, there are no designated or eligible historical resources in the Proposed Project area. The City of Anaheim maintains a local inventory of historic structures; according to a memorandum included as Appendix D, Review of Historic Status for 200 West Alro Way, prepared by the City of Anaheim, the existing building is not included in this inventory. Additionally, Project Site is not located on any of the City’s local historic districts or Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-26 Environmental Analysis National Register Districts (City of Anaheim 2016). Therefore, no impacts related to historical resources would occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? An archaeological records search was conducted at the South Central Coastal Information Center (SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton on October 20, 2016. The record search indicated that two cultural resource sites have been previously recorded within a ½ mile of the Project Site; however, none of these resources includes the Project Site. Refer to Table 6, Cultural Resource Sites Within A Half Mile of the Project Area, below. TABLE 6 CULTURAL RESOURCE SITES WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Trinomial/Primary Number Recorder (Year) Description P-30-176610 Marsh (1987) Resource Name – 1842 Mountain View P-30-177545 Crawford (2014) Resource Name – Anaheim Convention Center; Other – T-Mobile West LLC LA02856G/Anaheim Convention Center Source: SCCIC 2016. Eight cultural resources studies have been completed within a ½-mile radius of the Project Site; however, none of these studies included the Project Site. Refer to Table 7, Cultural Resource Studies Within A Half Mile of the Project Area, below. TABLE 7 CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. Author(s) (Year) Type of Study (Resources Identified) OR-00814 Romani (1982) Historic Property Survey Route I-5 Santa Ana Transportation Corridor, Route 405 in Orange County to Route 605 in Los Angeles County PM 21.30/44.38; 0.00/6.85 OR-00980 Padon (1987) Historic Property Survey Report 07-ORA-5 PM 34.0 to 42.1 PM OR-01898 Anonymous (1990) Finding of Effect Widening of Interstate 5 and Reconstruction of Interchanges Between State Routes 22/57 and 91 in the Cities of Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Fullerton and Buena Park OR-02213 Maxon (2000) Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0079, Anaheim, CA OR-02506 Webb and Huey (1978) Historic Property Survey, Haster Street Overcrossing OR-02904 Kyle (2002) Cultural Resource Assessment for Cingular Wireless Facility SM 189-01, City of Anaheim, Orange County, California Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-27 Environmental Analysis TABLE 7 CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES WITHIN A HALF MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA Report No. Author(s) (Year) Type of Study (Resources Identified) OR-03373 Arrington and Sikes (2006) Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring and Findings for the Qwest Network Construction Project State of California: Volumes I and II OR-03936 Glover and Gust (2010) Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Monitoring Compliance Report for the Disney’s California Adventure Expansion, Cars Land Project, City of Anaheim, California Source: SCCIC 2016. The project area is all previously disturbed soil; therefore, ground disturbance would be limited to the areas subjected to the disturbance associated with previous development activities, including the construction of the existing land uses. Therefore, the same area would be subject to impacts and no new impacts related to cultural resources would occur. Additionally, the Proposed Project Site is part of a highly urbanized area and is fully developed with a variety of structures. As noted in EIR 340, no archaeological or paleontological resources have been identified in or near the ARSP and no known unique geologic features are located in the ARSP. However, consistent with the analysis provided in EIR 340, SR 5.4-1 would ensure no impacts to human remains would occur and implementation of MMs 5.4-1 and 5.4-2 would reduce any potential impacts related to paleontological and archaeological resources to less than significant levels. As a result, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to archaeological or paleontological resources. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Consistent with the analysis in EIR 340, there are no cemeteries or identified human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries, known to be located on the Project Site. However, this does not preclude the possibility that individual burial sites may be discovered during grading activities. Pursuant to SR 5.4-1 from EIR 340 and restated below, the project would comply with Section 7050.5 of the California Health and Safety Code and Section 5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code, which requires the County Coroner to be notified immediately if any human remains are encountered. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to disturbance of human remains. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-28 Environmental Analysis information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the cultural resources analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirements and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.4-1 Before and during construction, if human remains are discovered on-site, no further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner has made a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to Public Resources Code Section 5097.98 and California Health and Safety Code Section 7050.5. Mitigation Measures MM 5.4-1 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. MM 5.4-2 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-29 Environmental Analysis found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. 5.6 GEOLOGY 5.6.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 Analysis of potential impacts related to earth resources in EIR 311 revealed that the project would expose people to seismic risk typical of Southern California. Such a risk was considered less than significant with implementation of project mitigation measures. MM 3.6-1 through MM 3.6-6 require the preparation of a soils and geological report; approval of foundation design information; submission of a report regarding foundation excavations; submission of plans showing analysis of earthquake loading; training with the Fire Department for hotel staff and cast members; and approval of an earthquake emergency response plan for hotels. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 EIR 340 identified active and potentially active faults in the region that could result in seismic- related impacts to future development projects associated with the buildout of the ARSP. Seismic events along these faults have the potential to result in strong ground motion. EIR 340 concluded that potential impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be reduced to less than significant levels with implementation of the MM 5.5-1 through MM 5.5-6; conformance with the applicable requirements listed in the Anaheim Municipal Code; and conformance to the California Building Code. MM 5.5-1 through MM 5.5-4 and MM 5.5-6 replicate the requirements under MM 3.6-1 through MM 3.6-5 in EIR 311. MM 5.5-5 requires the implementation of standard practices under all applicable codes and ordinances. As noted in EIR 340, the ARSP area is located in a relatively flat area with minimal potential for erosion impacts due to the high amount of urban development and low amount of bare ground. However, during demolition and construction activities when areas are exposed to erosion and loss of topsoil, adherence to the following Standard Conditions # would ensure that impacts would be less than significant: local and State codes and requirements for erosion control and grading; compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and the subsequent development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Additionally, expansive soils are known to exist in the ARSP area; however, implementation of mitigation requiring adherence to measures requiring detailed foundation design and preparation of a report to analyze foundation excavations would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-30 Environmental Analysis 5.6.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on Appendix E, Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis (Geotechnical Report) prepared for the Proposed Project by Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (2016). Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42? ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? According to the Geotechnical Report, the Project Site is located in the highly seismic Southern California region in the influence area of several fault systems. However, the Project Site does not lie within the boundaries of an Earthquake Fault Zone as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. The Puente Hills (Coyote Hills), San Joaquin Hills, and Elsinore faults are the closest known active faults and are located approximately 4.4, 7.9, and 9.0 miles, respectively, from the site. Construction on the Project Site has historically occurred in a manner consistent with City and State codes. Consistent with the conclusions of EIR 311 and EIR 340, all future development associated with the Proposed Project would comply with SR 5.5- 1 and MMs 5.5-1 through 5.5-6 from EIR 340 as detailed below. With implementation of these measures, impacts related to exposure of people or structures to seismic-related hazards would be less than significant. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? According to the Geotechnical Report and consistent with the findings in EIR 340, the Project Site is not located in a designated liquefaction hazard zone (Giles 2016). The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. iv) Landslides? According to the Geotechnical Report and consistent with the findings in EIR 340, the Project Site is not located in a designated landslide hazard zone, nor is it located near an unstable slope (Giles 2016). The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Due to the location of the Project Site in a relatively flat and developed area, the Proposed Project is not anticipated to result in substantial erosion or loss of topsoil. According to Appendix G, Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-31 Environmental Analysis Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Walden & Associates (2016a), with implementation of the Proposed Project, impervious surfaces on the Project Site would increase from 69 percent under existing conditions to 76 percent impervious upon project completion (Walden & Associates 2016a). This increase in impervious surface area would occur primarily due to the increase in development area associated with the Proposed Project, as discussed previously in Section 4.0, Project Description. Once construction is complete, the Project Site shall comply with Best Management Practices (BMPs) identified in the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) prepared for the Proposed Project to reduce erosion effects to less than significant levels as discussed in Section 5.9, Hydrology and Water Quality, of this Addendum. Furthermore, construction activities would be performed pursuant to the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. a) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? Consistent with the findings of EIR 311 and EIR 340, the Proposed Project Site is not located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable. As identified in Section 2.4.2 of EIR 340, geologic hazard maps show that the Proposed Project Site is not located in an area susceptible to landslides, liquefaction, or other potentially unstable conditions. According to the Geotechnical Report prepared for the project, possible fills were encountered on the Project Site to depths of approximately 3.0 to 4.5 feet below existing grade and consisted generally of moist, very loose to medium density in relatively dense, silty sand. Native soils (alluvial deposits) encountered underneath the possible fill generally consisted of damp to moist, very loose to dense silty sand and sand and very moist, firm to stiff silty clay and sandy clay. The finer soils (clay) were encountered at depths of about 25 to 45 feet in Testing Boring B-3 (Giles 2016). Groundwater was not encountered during the investigation; however, the historical high groundwater depth for the Project Site is greater than 50 feet below ground surface (bgs) based on review of the California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) Seismic Hazards Zone report for the Anaheim Quadrangle (Giles 2016). Based on these Project Site conditions, potential impacts related to ground stability would be less than significant. This impact is consistent with what was identified in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? As noted in EIR 340, the City of Anaheim contains soils that range from having low to high expansion potential; therefore, the Proposed Project Site may be located in an area considered to have expansive soils. According to the Geotechnical Report prepared for the project, the results of the Expansion Index (EI) test indicates that the near surface sample has very low expansion potential (Giles 2016). Implementation of current codes and regulations identified in the Anaheim Municipal Code would ensure that potential impacts related to expansive soils would be less than significant. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-32 Environmental Analysis This impact is consistent with that identified in EIR 340 related to buildout of the ARSP. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? Consistent with the analysis in EIR 340, the Proposed Project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative sewer disposal systems. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the geology analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirement and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirement SR 5.5-1 All grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Title 17, Land Development and Resources, and the most recent version of the California Building Code. Mitigation Measures MM 5.5-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, detailed foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer. MM 5.5-2 Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer to the Planning Department, Building Services Division for review and approval, which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-33 Environmental Analysis beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing. MM 5.5-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Planning Department, Building Services Division for review and approval showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the California Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim. MM 5.5-4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection for a hotel/motel, the property owner/developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review and approval by the Fire Department. The plan shall require posted notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures and incorporate ongoing earthquake training for hotel staff to the satisfaction of the Fire Department. MM 5.5-5 Ongoing during grading activities, the property owner/developer shall implement standard practices for all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion to the satisfaction of the Planning Department, Building Services Division. MM 5.5-6 Prior to issuance of building or grading permits, the property owner/developer shall submit to the Planning Department, Building Services Division geologic and geotechnical investigations in areas of potential seismic or geologic hazards and provide a note on plans that all grading operations will be conducted in conformance with the recommendations contained in the applicable geotechnical investigation. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. 5.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 5.7.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 did not directly address greenhouse gas emissions; however, an analysis of the DRSP’s impacts related to energy was provided and is summarized here. Mitigation measures related to energy included MM 3.14-1, which requires implementation of all project design features (PDFs); MM 3.14-2, which requires incorporation of fuel-efficient models of gas-powered building equipment; PDF 3.14-1, which requires development in conformance with The DRSP; and PDF 3.14-2, which ensures parking facility design in conformance with Section 7.0 of The DRSP. Despite the new demand for energy projected for the DRSP, EIR 311 reports that implementation of MM 3.14-1, MM 3.14-2, PDF 3.14-1, and PDF 3.14-2 would reduce any energy usage impacts to a level considered less than significant. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 EIR 340 concluded that although the Proposed Project would not conflict with applicable regulations and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions and although feasible mitigation measures would be incorporated into the Proposed Project, the magnitude of the increase in GHG emissions would remain cumulatively considerable and the Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-34 Environmental Analysis impact to GHG emissions would be significant and unavoidable. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential impacts. 5.7.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on Appendix B, City of Anaheim – Element Hotel Project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum (Air Quality and GHG Report) prepared for the Proposed Project by Vista Environmental (2016a) Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? In developing methods for GHG impact analysis, there have been suggestions of quantitative thresholds (often referred to as screening levels) that define an emissions level below which it may be presumed that climate change impacts would be less than significant. Neither the SCAQMD nor the City of Anaheim has adopted a GHG emissions significance threshold for non- industrial development projects. Consequently, the City has determined, pursuant to the discretion afforded by Sections 15064.4(a) and 15064.4(b) of the State CEQA Guidelines, that the impact of the Proposed Project’s GHG emissions be assessed based on the methodologies proposed by SCAQMD’s GHG CEQA Significance Threshold Working Group. On December 5, 2008, the SCAQMD Governing Board adopted the staff proposal for a tiered threshold approach wherein Tier 1 determines if a project qualifies for an applicable CEQA exemption; Tier 2 determines consistency with GHG reduction plans; and Tier 3 proposes a numerical screening value as a threshold. At their September 28, 2010, meeting, the Working Group suggested a Tier 3 threshold of 3,000 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent (MTCO2e) per year for all non- industrial (i.e. residential or commercial) land use types.4 In the absence of adopted thresholds, the City has decided to assess the significance of the project’s GHG emissions using this SCAQMD proposed Tier 3 screening threshold (SCAQMD 2010). It is noted that the use of the Tier 3 threshold is selected for the Proposed Project because the Project Site is located in the South Coast Air Basin and these thresholds are based on the best available information and data at the time this document was prepared. The development of CEQA project-level thresholds is an ongoing effort on State and regional levels, and significance thresholds may differ for future projects based on new or additional data and information that may be available at that time. However, this analysis approach is consistent with that used for EIR 340. The Proposed Project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. The project’s GHG emissions have been calculated and are shown in Table 8, Proposed Project Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions. 4 The SCAQMD recommended threshold for industrial development projects is 10,000 MTCO2e per year. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-35 Environmental Analysis TABLE 8 PROPOSED PROJECT GREENHOUSE GAS ANNUAL EMISSIONS Category Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Area Sourcesa 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 Energy Usageb 479.09 0.02 0.01 481.33 Mobile Sourcesc 933.14 0.03 0.00 933.87 Solid Wasted 9.67 0.57 0.00 21.67 Water and Sewere 15.84 0.12 0.00 19.15 Constructionf 15.43 0.00 0.00 15.48 Total Emissions 1,453.18 0.74 0.01 1,471.51 SCAQMD Draft Threshold of Significance for All Land Use Types 3,000 CO2: carbon dioxide; CH4: methane; N2O: nitrous oxide; CO2e: carbon dioxide equivalent; SCAQMD: South Coast Air Quality Management District. a Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. b Energy usage consists of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. c Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. d Waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. e Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for the transport of water and processing of sewer. f Construction emissions amortized over 30 years as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group on November 19, 2009. Source: Vista Environmental 2016a. As shown, the Proposed Project would create 1,471.51 MTCO2e per year. According to the SCAQMD draft threshold of significance, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the ongoing operations would exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, a less than significant impact related to the generation of GHG emissions would occur from development of the Proposed Project. Impacts would be less than significant. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? The Proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The applicable plans for the Proposed Project consist of the City of Anaheim’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Reduction Plan), adopted July 2015 and the SCAQMD Working Group’s draft GHG thresholds. City of Anaheim The City of Anaheim’s GHG Reduction Plan provides reduction targets for energy usage, water conservation, photovoltaic (PV) rooftop installations, and transportation emissions. For energy usage, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target 15 percent reduction of the energy utilized by businesses and homes in Anaheim from 1990 levels by 2020 and a 30 percent reduction from 1990 levels by 2030. This target would be met through implementation of the following project features that would be incorporated into the project design:  Provide electric vehicle charging stations;  Provide preferred parking spaces for clean air vehicles; Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-36 Environmental Analysis  Provide shuttle service to Disneyland;  Exceed California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 energy efficiency standards;  Utilize high-efficiency light-emitting diode (LED) indoor and outdoor lighting;  Install low-flow toilets, faucets, and showers; and  Install water-efficient landscaping, with no turf. In addition to the project design features, the Proposed Project would be required to meet State regulations that include California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6 California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Buildings and Title 24, Part 11, California’s Green Building Standards, which require a variety of energy efficiency measures to be installed in new businesses that will reduce energy usage by 25 percent over the prior 2008 Title 24 Building Standards. The 2016 Title 24 Building Standards were released in July 2016 and are effective as of January 1, 2017. The anticipated 2019 Title 24 Building Standards are required to meet a zero-net energy goal. Therefore, through implementation of the project design features listed above and State regulations, the Proposed Project will meet the energy use reduction targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan also includes water conservation targets of a 20 percent reduction by 2020 and a 25 percent reduction by 2030. As detailed above, the proposed hotel would include the following project design features: installation of low-flow toilets, faucets, and showers and installation of water-efficient landscaping with no turf. These project design features would reduce the amount of water used by the proposed hotel, and the Proposed Project would comply with this measure. The GHG Reduction Plan also includes a 2020 target of 27,000 kilowatts (kW) of PV systems installed by 2020 and 37,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2030. This target would be met through application of State regulations, including California Code of Regulations Title 24, Part 6. The 2013 Title 24 Building Standards require that new hotels are constructed to be solar ready to facilitate the installation of rooftop solar systems. This requirement is typically met through structural design to ensure that rooftops are designed to handle the weight of PV systems and through installation of electrical conduit from the main circuit panel area to the roof. The Applicant has stated that consideration is being given to providing a rooftop PV system; however, current PV installation incentives only apply to existing structures, so it is more feasible to construct rooftop PV systems after the proposed hotel has been completed and has been operational for a period of time. Therefore, through compliance with the State regulations, the Proposed Project, in association with future commercial projects in the City, would meet the PV rooftop installation targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan also includes a 2020 target of a 6,000 MTCO2e reduction in vehicle emissions and a 2030 target of a 20,000 MTCO2e reduction in vehicle emissions. As detailed above, the proposed hotel would include the following project design features: electric vehicle charging stations, preferred parking for clean air vehicles, and a shuttle service to and from the nearby Disneyland theme parks. These project design features would reduce vehicle emissions generated by the operation of the hotel, and the Proposed Project would comply with this measure. Therefore, the Proposed Project would comply with the reduction targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. Draft GHG Emissions Thresholds As discussed previously, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e for all land use type projects. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-37 Environmental Analysis According to the project GHG emissions calculations above, implementation of the Proposed Project would result in the generation of 1,471.51 MTCO2e per year. The Proposed Project would be below the SCAQMD’s proposed threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. As detailed above, development of the Proposed Project would meet the targets outlined in the GHG Reduction Plan and would meet SCAQMD’s draft threshold. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy, or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. Additionally, implementation of the mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C for the Proposed Project, as described in the Mitigation section below, would also provide GHG emission reductions through reduced vehicle miles traveled, reduced water use, and improved energy efficiency. Thus, the Proposed Project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation of State, regional, or local agencies. This impact is less than significant. This impact identified for the Proposed Project would be consistent with what was identified in EIR 340; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the GHG emissions analysis provided in EIR 340. Mitigation EIR 340 identified a number of mitigation measures covering a variety of environmental topics which have been restated in the appropriate sections of this document. The following mitigation measures would be applicable to the Proposed Project: Air Quality: 5.2-1, 5.2-4, 5.2-5, and 5.2- 6; Hazards and Hazardous Materials: 5.8-5; Public Services: 5.14-4, 5.14-5, 5.14-8, 5.14-9, 5.14- 20, and 5.14-21; Recreation: 5.15-1, and 5.15-4; Water: 5.17-1, 5.17-3, and 5.17-4; and Electricity: 5.19-1, 5.19-2, 5.19-4, and 5.19-5. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-38 Environmental Analysis 5.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 5.8.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 concluded that impacts associated with the potential release of hazardous materials would be reduced to a level considered less than significant with implementation of MM 3.11-1 through MM 3.11-10, MM 3.8-10, and PDF 3.11-1. MM 3.11-1 requires implementation of PDF 3.11-1, which requires expansion of compliance efforts for the utilization of hazardous materials. MM 3.11-2 through MM 3.11-5 are related to underground storage tanks (USTs). MM 3.11-6, MM 3.11-7, MM 3.11-9, and MM 3.11-10 are related to potentially hazardous conditions at specific sites within The DRSP. MM 3.11-8 requires testing of transformers for PCBs. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP would have the potential to disturb lead-based paints (LBP) and asbestos-containing materials (ACM) depending on the age of existing structures in the ARSP area. Additionally, given the presence of underground storage tanks, including ones which have been identified as having leaked, buildout of the ARSP would have the potential to disturb hazardous materials. MM 5.7-1 through MM 5.7-5 relate to USTs; MM 5.7-6 requires compliance with the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law; and MM 5.7-7 requires a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. With implementation of these mitigation measures, potential impacts related to hazardous material on or near the ARSP area would be reduced to less than significant levels. 5.8.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? The Project Site is currently developed with a commercial building (formerly Bergstrom Children’s Store) and associated surface parking lot, neither of which involve the transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials beyond those associated with typical operational activities such as common cleaners and detergents. Appendix F-1, Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report (Phase I ESA) was conducted for the Project Site by Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. The Phase I ESA revealed no evidence of recognizable environmental conditions (RECs). However, the following was identified during the course of the assessment: The project site was historically used for agricultural purposes. There is a potential that agricultural related chemicals such as pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, may have been used and stored onsite. The project site is either paved over or covered by building structures that minimize direct contact to any potential remaining concentrations in the soil. Additionally, during previous site development activities, near surface soils (where residual agricultural chemical concentrations Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-39 Environmental Analysis would have most likely been present, if at all) were generally mixed with fill material or disturbed during grading. Also, it is common that engineered fill material is placed over underlying soils as part of the development activities. Furthermore, it is likely that residual agricultural chemicals (if any) would have likely degraded since the site was last utilized for agricultural purposes. These additional variables serve to further reduce the potential for exposure to residual agricultural chemicals (if any). It was concluded that the possible former use of agricultural chemicals is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. Evidence of historic water intrusion in the office and warehouse areas of the project site. No suspect mold growth was noted; therefore, the observed water intrusion is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern (Partner 2016). During construction and operational activities associated with the Proposed Project, there is expected to be incidental use of materials categorized as “hazardous”. These include paints, solvents, certain cleaners, and other corrosive materials like common cleaners and detergents. The use, transport, and storage of these materials would comply with all regulations governing their use. Construction and operational activities associated with the Proposed Project would be in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations regarding hazardous waste, including the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the California Hazardous Waste Control Act, and the California Accidental Release Prevention Program. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Although no impact would occur, adherence to previously approved SRs 5.7-1 and 5.7-3 from EIR 340 identified below would ensure that an impact would not occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The Proposed Project is located within a ¼-mile of an existing school; specifically, the nearest school is Paul Revere Elementary School located northeast of the Project Site at 140 West Guinida Lane. However, as noted above, the Proposed Project would not involve the storage, handling, or transport of hazardous materials beyond those associated with typical construction and operational activities such as common cleaners and detergents. The handling and transport of these materials would be conducted in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations regarding hazardous waste. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? Appendix F-2, The EDR Radius Map Report with Geocheck, Anaheim Element Hotel, was prepared for the Proposed Project by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR 2016). Search parameters for this report were based on a one-mile radius of the Proposed Project Site and consisted of a search of federal, State, local, tribal, and other databases. The complete list of Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-40 Environmental Analysis databases and additional information regarding the site can be found in Appendix F-2. Based on a review of the EDR report, there are no listed hazardous materials sites of concern on the Proposed Project Site. The following sites were listed within a ¼ mile of the Project Site, as described below. None of these sites were listed on the Cortese list compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5.  1616 and 1638 South Clementine. This is a cluster of two sites recorded within the EDR Historical Auto Stations (EDR Hist Auto) database. No additional information was provided.  Anaheim Fire Station No. 3 and Odetics Inc. (1515 and 1563 South Manchester Avenue). This is a cluster of two sites recorded within multiple databases, including the Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database (HIST UST); the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, Small Quantity Generators (RCRA-SQG); Statewide Environmental Evaluation and Planning System (SWEEPS UST); Facility Inventory Database (CA FID UST); Facility Index System/Facility Registry System (FINDS); Emission Inventory Data (EMI); and Enforcement and Compliance History Online (ECHO). This cluster includes at least one diesel tank. The current status is Active. No violations were found.  311 and 353 West Cerritos Avenue. This is a cluster of two sites listed on the EDR Hist Auto and EDR Historical Dry Cleaners (EDR Hist Cleaner) databases. No additional information was provided.  Anaheim Fire Station No. 3, Former; Anaheim Resort Pump House No. 55 (1680 Clementine Street; and 1713 South Clementine Street No. 55). This is a cluster of three sites recorded within the Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Database and Underground Storage Tank (UST) Database. This cluster includes at least one diesel tank.  California Department of Transportation, DNR Industries, Leaverton Company, Vegas Transmissions, and Sherwin-Williams Co. (1550, 1558, 1562, and 1628 South Anaheim Boulevard). This is a cluster of five sites recorded within multiple databases, including the RCRA-SQG; FINDS; Hazardous Waste Information System (HAZNET); ECHO; and UST. This site includes at least one diesel tank. No violations were found.  Corcoran Manufacturing Co. Inc., Steiner Corp., Cruise America, Cowboy Auto, Advanced Automotive, Accurate Automotive, Ryder Truck Rental, and ICC (1745, 1755, 1763 Haster Street and 1710 and 1730 Anaheim Boulevard). This is a cluster of ten sites recorded within multiple databases, including the Superfund Enterprise Management System Archive (SEMS-ARCHIVE), RCRA-SQG, FINDS, ECHO, SWEEPS UST, CA FID UST, EMI, Hazardous Waste and Substances Sites List (HIST CORTESE), UST, Hazardous Substance Storage Container Database (HIST UST), LUST, and the list of industrial site cleanups in Orange County (Orange Co. Industrial Site) database. No violations were found. This cluster contains the site of a leaking underground gasoline storage tank that was discovered in 1988 where the soil was affected. Enforcement began in 1988, and the case was closed in 1991. One leaking UST, located at 1730 Anaheim Boulevard, is currently being confirmed. Additionally, the SEMS-ARCHIVE is a database that tracks sites in which the USEPA has no further interest. The Corcoran site (1745 Haster) is listed in the SEMS-ARCHIVE and would not impact the Project Site.  Satellite Cleaners Inc. and Flourocarbon Co. (1730 and 1754 South Clementine Street). This is a cluster of three sites recorded within multiple databases, including the Statewide Spills, Leaks, Investigations and Cleanup (SLIC) Cases; the listing of brownfields sites under the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-41 Environmental Analysis (BROWNFIELDS); RCRA-SQG; FINDS; DRYCLEANERS; and ECHO. This cluster includes at least one diesel tank. No violations were found. This cluster includes a site, located at 1730 South Clementine, currently under assessment by the Santa Ana RWQCB.  Wondries Toyota of Anaheim, Sanchez Recycling, Inc., Aljo Enterprises, Inc., and Anik Stop (1459, 1460, 1558, and 1601 South Anaheim Boulevard). This is a cluster of seven sites recorded within multiple databases, including the LUST; SWEEPS UST; HIST UST; CA FID UST; HIST CORTESE; Orange Co. Industrial Site database; list of recycling facilities in California (SWRCY); RCRA-SQG; FINDS; HAZNET; ECHO; and UST. This was the site of leaking USTs containing gasoline and waste oil discovered in 1990, which affected the soil. The site was subject to remediation and monitoring. The case was closed in 1992. No violations were found.  Anaheim Fire Station No. 3 (1580 South Clementine). This site has been recorded within the SWEEPS UST and CA FID UST databases. This site includes at least one diesel tank. According to the EDR Radius Map and the analyses presented in EIR 311 and EIR 340, no new hazardous materials sites were identified within the boundaries of the Project Site (EDR 2016). Of the hazardous materials sites identified in the project vicinity, none of the identified sites pose a hazard to the Project Site. Further, implementation of MMs 5.7-4 and 5.7-6 identified in EIR 340 and as listed below would ensure that any unforeseen impacts related to hazardous materials would be less than significant. No new impacts related to hazardous materials sites are anticipated and no additional mitigation is required. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The Proposed Project Site is not within an adopted Airport Land Use Plan or located in the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport, or helistop. No new impacts are anticipated. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? According to the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Safety Element (May 2004), the City has an emergency preparedness plan that complies with State law and interfaces with other cities and counties in Southern California. The Project Site is not located in the vicinity of an established emergency response or evacuation plan. Construction activity would be confined to the Project Site and would not interfere with vehicle movement or emergency access along the roadway. As detailed in Section 5.16, Transportation/Traffic, of this Addendum, any impacts related to the addition of project-related traffic would be less than significant; therefore, the project would not Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-42 Environmental Analysis interfere with the movement of emergency vehicles along local roadways. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The Proposed Project Site is located within an urban, developed area and would not be subject to wildland fire risks. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the hazards and hazardous materials analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirements and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.7-1 All construction activities, including demolition and renovation of the existing facilities and installation of the new facilities, shall be performed in compliance with all CalOSHA standards (California Code of Regulations, Title 8) to protect worker health and safety. SR 5.7-3 All transport and transfer of hazardous materials shall be performed by a licensed hauler in compliance with all applicable State and federal requirements, including the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-43 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures MM 5.7-4 Prior to issuance of the first grading demolition permit, whichever occurs first the property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval of the Fire Department which details procedures that will be taken if previously unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material or waste, is discovered onsite. MM 5.7-6 Ongoing during project demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), and according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. 5.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 5.9.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 determined that despite stormwater runoff increases related to the development of the DRSP, compliance with NPDES permit requirements and implementation of best management practices would reduce any impacts to groundwater and surface hydrology to less–than- significant levels. Additionally, the Project Site was found to be located outside the 100-year floodplain. No significant impacts were projected with implementation of MM 3.7-1 through 3.7-5, MMs 3.8-2 and 3.8-3, and PDF 3.7-1. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, implementation of the ARSP project would result in short-term construction- related and long-term operational potential for water quality impacts. However, implementation of MM 5.8-1 through MM 5.8-6 and compliance with the standard requirements reduces these impacts to a level considered less than significant. Although direct impacts to the underlying groundwater resources would not occur, indirect impacts associated with the anticipated increase in long-term demand for domestic water, landscape irrigation, and maintenance activities would be significant. Implementation of the proposed mitigation would reduce demand for groundwater resources, and potential impacts would be mitigated to less than significant levels. As identified in EIR 340, implementation of the ARSP project would result in site-specific changes to drainage patterns on development sites, but would not adversely impact regional hydrology or drainage flows in the surrounding area. It was found that potential increases in impervious surfaces could increase runoff rates and volumes. Additionally, the ARSP project has the potential to increase runoff volumes and rates to exacerbate existing deficiencies, potentially leading to localized street flooding. However, implementation of the mitigation measures and compliance with standard requirements would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-44 Environmental Analysis 5.9.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? k) Substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? l) Substantially degrade water quality by discharge which affects the beneficial uses (i.e., swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or downstream waters? The following analysis is based on Appendix G, Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP), prepared by Walden & Associates (2016a). According to the WQMP, potential pollutant sources associated with the development and operation of the proposed hotel may include suspended solids/sediments, nutrients, heavy metals, pathogens (bacteria/virus), pesticides, oil and grease, toxic organic compounds, and trash and debris. Construction and development activities would increase the potential for storm water runoff to transport these pollutants into the storm drain system, thus contributing to the degradation of water quality and the potential violation of water quality standards or waste discharge requirements. The Proposed Project would involve construction activities that disturb one acre or more of land and would be required to obtain an NPDES permit from the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB), Division of Water Quality (refer to SR 5.8-1, SR 5.8-4, and MM 5.8-2), as well as a water quality certification and/or waste discharge requirement pursuant to SR 5.8-5. A Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) is required for a project to be covered under the NPDES General Construction permit and must include BMPs to reduce water quality impacts. Non-structural BMPs proposed for the project include education for property owners, tenants, and occupants; common area landscape management; BMP maintenance; common area litter control; employee training; catch basin inspection; and street sweeping private streets and parking lot. Structural source control BMPs include storm drain system stenciling; trash and waste storage areas; efficient irrigation systems and landscape design; and incorporation of requirements applicable to individual priority project categories. The project also proposes installation of a sub-surface infiltration system—ADS Storm Tech Chamber, which would be sized to completely drain the proposed infiltration basin ponding depth within three hours. Overflow from this system would drain into the private storm drain system along Clementine Street. Consistent with the analysis presented in EIR 340, implementation of proposed mitigation and compliance with the standard requirements would minimize construction impacts from future developments in the DRSP and ARSP areas through implementation of BMPs that would reduce construction-related pollutants. This would ensure that any impacts to downstream waters resulting from construction activities associated with the Proposed Project Site would be less than significant. In addition to the requirements of the NPDES General Construction Permit, the Uniform Building Code and grading permit requirements include elements that also require reduction of erosion and sedimentation impacts during construction. Full compliance with applicable federal, State, and local regulations, including implementation of the proposed MMs 5.8-1 through 5.8-3 and adherence to SRs 5.8-1 through 5.8-5, would reduce water quality Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-45 Environmental Analysis impacts associated with construction to a less than significant level. No new significant impacts would occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? The following analysis is based on Appendix H, Preliminary Drainage Study (Drainage Report) prepared for the Proposed Project by Walden & Associates, Inc. (2016b). The Proposed Project area is considered highly urbanized and would have similar impacts to groundwater and surface hydrology as assumed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. According to the WQMP, development of the Proposed Project would increase the amount of impervious surface from 69 percent in pre-project conditions to 76 percent following Proposed Project implementation. According to the WQMP, the existing storm runoff drains from the east to west onto an existing curb and gutter located along Clementine Street. Under existing conditions, runoff enters into the City of Anaheim public storm drain system via a 63-inch and 84-inch reinforced concrete pipe (RCP) at Katella Avenue. From this point, runoff enters a 3/8-foot by 5-foot reinforced concrete box (RCB) maintained by the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD), CO3, connecting with CO2, then to Anaheim Bay, Bolsa Chica State Beach, and the Pacific Ocean (Walden & Associates 2016a). According to the Drainage Report, the proposed development would maintain similar drainage patterns to the pre-development condition, except that the easterly portion of the site would no longer drain onto the southerly property. The proposed improvements to the site would convey storm water from ten separate subareas throughout the site into a proposed private storm drain system that would convey surface runoff to a proposed underground infiltration system for treatment. The rooftops would drain to the building’s storm drain system connecting to the on-site storm drain. Surface drainage would sheet flow to curbs and gutters and flow to grated inlets that connect to the on-site storm drain system. The on-site storm drain would connect to the underground infiltration system shown on Exhibit 10, Drainage Concept (Walden & Associates 2016a). Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-46 Environmental Analysis The post-development peak discharge would exceed the allowable peak discharge since the post- development condition is more impervious. However, the proposed private storm drain system would retain the proposed flow from the water quality storm event and detain the proposed flows to match the pre-developed 25-year storm event of 7.0 cubic feet per second (cfs). Therefore, based on the findings of the Drainage Report and with implementation of MMs 5.8-4 through 5.8- 6, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to groundwater, drainage, or storm drain capacity. Despite this finding, the Applicant would still be responsible for payment of applicable Storm Drain Impact Fees (refer to SR 5.8-3). The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Consistent with the analysis in EIR 311 and as discussed in EIR 340, the Proposed Project Site is located within the 100-Year (with flooding below one foot) to 500-Year Flood Zone and within the general limits of the flood impact zones associated with Prado Dam failure. Implementation of the Proposed Project may potentially expose more people and habitable structures to potential flooding. However, development of structures in compliance with local, State, and federal regulations, including compliance with the Cobey-Alquist Floodplain Management Act requirements and State of California Model Ordinance as set forth in the City of Anaheim General Plan, would ensure that significant impacts would not occur. Therefore, because the Proposed Project Site is in the same location as previously analyzed in EIR 311 and because the flood conditions in the area are unchanged, a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects would not be created in relation to the 100-year flood hazard area from the Proposed Project. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. j) Inundation by seiche or mudflow? Consistent with the analysis in EIR 311 and as discussed in EIR 340, the Proposed Project Site is not located near any large, enclosed bodies of water that would cause a seiche. Additionally, the Proposed Project Site is, in general, a flat area that experiences such a slight change in elevation that it would not be subject to mudflows. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-47 Environmental Analysis Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the hydrology and water quality analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirements and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.8-1 Development projects that will result in soil disturbance of one (1) or more acres of land shall comply with the State’s Construction General Permit by filing a Notice of Intent (NOI) with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) and implementing a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). Prior to the issuance of preliminary or precise grading permits, the property owner/developer shall provide the City Engineer with evidence that an NOI has been filed with the SWRCB by providing a copy of the NOI invoice and the assigned Waste Discharger Identification (WDID) No. for the project. The SWPPP shall include Best Management Practices (BMPs) designed with a goal of preventing a net sediment load increase in storm water discharges relative to preconstruction levels and shall prohibit during the construction period discharges of storm water or non- storm water at levels which would cause or contribute to an exceedance of applicable water quality standards contained in the Basin Plan. The BMPs shall address erosion control, sediment control, wind erosion control, tracking control, non-stormwater management and waste management and materials pollution control during all phases of construction, including a sampling and analysis plan for sediment and non-visible storm water pollutants. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for proper implementation of the SWPPP. SR 5.8-2 Prior to issuance of the precise grading permit, the property owner/developer shall prepare Water Quality Management Plans (WQMPs) for review and approval by the Public Works, Development Services. The WQMP shall identify permanent site design, source control and treatment control Best Management Practices (BMPs) that will be used on the site to control predictable pollutant runoff. The WQMP shall also describe the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the treatment control BMPs and the mechanism for funding the BMPs. The WQMP shall be recorded against the property to ensure long-term compliance. SR 5.8-3 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay the Storm Drain Impact Fees which would go toward future storm drain improvements within The Anaheim Resort area and South Central City area. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-48 Environmental Analysis SR 5.8-4 Chapter 10.09 of the Anaheim Municipal Code is the City’s NPDES Ordinance, which provides regulations to comply with the CWA, the California Porter-Cologne Water Quality Control Act, and the City’s NPDES permit. This ordinance prohibits the discharge of specific pollutants into the storm water; regulates illicit connections to the storm drain system; requires development projects to implement permanent BMPs on individual sites to reduce pollutants in the storm water; and requires local discharge permits for non-storm water discharges into the storm drain system. SR 5.8-5 Prior to issuance of a grading permit, the property owner/developer of individual developments shall provide written proof to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division of a water quality certification and/or waste discharge requirement (WDR) as well as a plan for compliance with the discharge prohibitions, TMDLs, and various programs of the Santa Ana RWQCB. The Santa Ana RWQCB implements the Water Quality Control Plan for the Santa Ana River Basin through the through issuance of individual WDRs; discharge prohibitions; water quality certifications; programs for salt management, non-point sources, and storm water; and monitoring and regulatory enforcement actions, as necessary. Mitigation Measures MM 5.8-1 Prior to issuance of the first grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public Works Department, Development Services Division and Orange County Environmental Management Agency. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm; and, b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project- generated drainage and runoff. MM 5.8-2 Prior to issuance of a grading permit for sites that disturb more than one (1) acre of soil, the property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the Planning Department, Building Services Division. MM 5.8-3 Ongoing during project operations, the property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim on a monthly basis, including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots. The use of water to clean streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and flushing the debris and sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited. MM 5.8-4 Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect to the City certifying that the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-49 Environmental Analysis MM 5.8-5 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install piping on-site with project water mains so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation, if and when it becomes available. MM 5.8-6 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence that all storm drain, sewer, and street improvement plans shall be designed and constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. 5.10 LAND USE 5.10.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 Land Use-Related Plans and Policies The analysis of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan in EIR 311 determined that the project would require an amendment to the Orange County Master Plan of Arterial Highways. This was not considered a significant impact. Additionally, the project would be consistent with all other land use plans and policies, therefore, with implementation of MMs 3.2-1 and 3.2-2 and PDF 3.2-1, result in no significant impacts as long as implementation of project mitigation measures would occur. Land Use Compatibility According to EIR 311, DRSP would allow for the replacement of on-site uses with similar land uses, thus resulting in no significant impact with implementation of project MMs 3.2-1 through 3.2- 3. EIR 311 also identified that the project would contribute to a significant impact related to land use compatibilities inherent in the juxtaposition of commercial and residential uses. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 EIR 340 concluded that build out of the ARSP would be consistent with the respective goals and policies of local and regional regulatory and planning documents. Specifically, the ARSP build out was found to be consistent with and supportive of the three key principles set forth in the 2012– 2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: mobility, economy, and sustainability. Additionally, EIR 340 provided a consistency analysis with all relevant goals and policies identified in the City of Anaheim General Plan. 5.10.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? The Proposed Project involves the redevelopment of the site as a five-story, 174-room hotel. As part of the Proposed Project, one commercial building would be fully demolished and removed. Surrounding land uses include the I-5 freeway to the north and east and ongoing construction Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-50 Environmental Analysis (Country Inn & Suites) and Manchester Avenue to the north and west. All of these uses function independently of the former commercial use on the Project Site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not physically divide an established community. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would be less than what was identified in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? As detailed in Section 4.0, Project Description, of this Addendum, the Proposed Project would construct a 5-story, 174-room hotel, which is a conditionally permitted use under the existing land use designation and zoning for the Project Site. As noted, the southern 1.34 acres of the Project Site are located within the boundaries of the DRSP in the Parking District and the C-R Overlay. The DRSP permits the Project Site to be developed in accordance with the zoning and development standards for either the Parking District (Section 18.114.080 of Chapter 18.114) or the C-R Overlay (Section 18.114.100 of Chapter 18.114). The Proposed Project would be developed in accordance with the C-R Overlay, which permits the uses set forth in the C-R District of the ARSP. The northern 0.34 acre of the Project Site is located within the boundaries of the ARSP in the C-R District within the Low-Medium Density designation. The Low-Medium Density designation allows a maximum of 75 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot/parcel, whichever is greater. According to the City of Anaheim zoning map, the Project Site is zoned DRSP and is subject to the development standards set forth in the DRSP as incorporated into the City’s Zoning Ordinance as Chapter 18.114. More specifically, the Project Site is located within the C-R Overlay within the DRSP, which was, as discussed above, established to permit uses set forth in the ARSP for properties not developed as part of the DRSP. The project would comply with the allowable density and requirements with the exception of the interior landscape setback in addition to the landscape setback along Manchester Avenue. Additionally, an Administrative Adjustment has been requested, which would allow 12 fewer parking spaces than required by the Code, which is within a ten percent deviation. Upon approval of the three variances requested and adjustment to provide fewer parking spaces than required by the Code, no conflicts with applicable land use plans, policies, or regulations would occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The Project Site is not located within or near any designated habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans; therefore, implementation of the Proposed Project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted HCP, NCCP, or other approved local, regional, or State HCP (Anaheim 2004b). Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-51 Environmental Analysis The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the land use analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following condition of approval was adopted in connection with EIR 311. This COA would be applicable to the Proposed Project. COA 29 That all Final Site Plans shall be prepared in conformance with the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Final Site Plan Pre-File submittal requirements on file with the Planning Services Division of the Planning Department. Prior to issuance of building permits construction plans shall be in substantial conformance with said Final Site Plans. 5.11 MINERAL RESOURCES 5.11.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 does not specifically address mineral resources. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, the ARSP area is not located in an area designated as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) or Regionally Significant Aggregate Resources Area. Because no additional excavation beyond what was previously evaluated would occur, the Proposed Project would not result in the loss of any mineral resource. 5.11.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-52 Environmental Analysis The Proposed Project is not located in an area designated as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) or Regionally Significant Aggregate Resources Area (Anaheim 2004b). Additionally, the Proposed Project Site is in a fully developed and urbanized area that has been subject to substantial grading and excavation activities associated with existing development on and surrounding the Proposed Project Site. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 340. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the mineral resources analysis provided in EIR 340. Mitigation No mitigation measures are required. 5.12 NOISE 5.12.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 determined that implementation of the MMs 3.5-1 through 3.5-7 and MMs 3.8-7 through 3.8-9 would reduce any potential noise impacts from fireworks and the proposed amphitheater to a level considered less than significant. Traffic-related noise impacts were within the limits of the Noise Ordinance and therefore would be considered less than significant. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 EIR 340 determined that construction activities associated with the ARSP have the potential to significantly impact noise-sensitive receptors. Adherence to the standard requirements and implementation of the MMs 5.10-1 through 5.10-12 would reduce potential impacts; however, these impacts may remain significant and unavoidable. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential short-term, construction- related deficiencies. Construction in the ARSP area would have the potential to cause vibration levels that would be noticeable for short periods. With implementation of recommended mitigation measures, vibration impacts during construction would be less than significant. Development associated with the ARSP would create long-term land use compatibility issues related to noise and would expose receptors to noise levels in excess of established standards, thereby resulting in potentially significant impacts. However, it was determined that adherence to Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-53 Environmental Analysis the standard requirements and implementation of MMs 5.10-4 through 5.10-7 would reduce long- term, operational impacts to less than significant levels. 5.12.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on Appendix I City of Anaheim – Element Hotel Project Noise Technical Memorandum (Noise Report) prepared for the Proposed Project by Vista Environmental (2016b) and which includes the Alro Element Hotel Exterior Noise Survey and Recommendations- Updates (Exterior Noise Survey), prepared by Newsom Brown Acoustics, LLC (2016) as an appendix. Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? The Proposed Project would not expose persons to or generate noise levels in excess of standards established in the General Plan and the Noise Ordinance or applicable standards of other agencies. The following section calculates the potential noise emissions associated with the construction and operations of the Proposed Project and compares the noise levels to the City standards. Construction-Related Noise Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, the sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptor to the Project Site is a mobile home park located 500 feet north of the Project Site. In addition, the Country Inn & Suites hotel is located 85 feet west of the Project Site; however, it should be noted that the hotel is a commercial use and is not normally considered as a sensitive receptor. Proposed Project construction would occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on any day, except on Sundays or City-recognized holidays when no noise-generating construction activities shall be permitted in accordance with Section 6.70.010 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code (SR 5.10-1). Construction noise during the specified hours is exempt from the quantitative noise level limits of the Municipal Code. Through adherence to the limitation of allowable construction times provided in Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code, the construction-related noise levels would not exceed any standards. Impacts would be less than significant. Operational-Related Noise The Proposed Project would be adjacent to I-5, which may create noise levels in excess of City standards at the proposed hotel rooms as well as generate noise from on-site sources that may exceed City noise standards at nearby sensitive receptors. The operational noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors and proposed hotel rooms have been analyzed separately below. Noise Impacts to Off-Site Sensitive Receptors The operation of the Proposed Project may create an increase in on-site noise levels from noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment, parking lot activities, and delivery truck activities. The pool would be located outdoors and may also contribute to on-site noise levels. Section Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-54 Environmental Analysis 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code limits noise impacts to the nearby property lines to 60 decibels (dB). However, it should be noted that the measured noise levels on the site are currently 86.2 A-weighted decibels (dBA) community noise equivalent level (CNEL) on the Project Site. The anticipated on-site noise sources at 10 feet typically produce noise levels of 67 dBA for rooftop mechanical equipment, 55 dBA for parking lot activities, 64 dBA for truck deliveries, and 70 dBA for children playing pools. All of the anticipated noise sources are at least 16 dB below the existing ambient noise level on the Project Site and would not provide a measurable increase in noise levels to any nearby property. Impacts would be less than significant. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not expose persons to noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance. Noise Impacts to Proposed On-Site Sensitive Receptors The Proposed Project would consist of the operation of a 174-room hotel with an outdoor recreation area with a pool. According to Goal 1.1, Policy 6 of the City of Anaheim General Plan, the siting of sensitive uses in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL is discouraged without appropriate mitigation, and Table N-3 from the General Plan details how the State limits the interior noise level for hotel rooms to 45 dBA CNEL. The on-site noise impacts to the proposed hotel rooms and outdoor recreation area have been analyzed in detail in the Exterior Noise Survey. Based on recommendations in the Exterior Noise Survey, the project would include installation of glazed windows and construction of a sound wall around the perimeter of the outdoor recreation and pool areas. With these project design elements, none of the proposed hotel rooms would exceed the 45 dBA CNEL interior noise standard based on standard hotel construction, and the outdoor recreation area, including the pool area, would not exceed the 65 dBA CNEL exterior noise standard. Therefore, no significant impacts would occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? The Proposed Project would not expose persons to or result in the generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. Neither the Municipal Code nor the General Plan provide a quantifiable vibration threshold. However, the City of Anaheim General Plan EIR used the California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) vibration threshold of 0.2 inch per second peak particle velocity (PPV) threshold to determine vibration impacts associated with implementation of the General Plan. Since the 0.2 inch per second PPV threshold is a substantiated threshold that has been utilized by the City, it is also utilized in the analysis of vibration impacts for the Proposed Project. The following sections analyze the potential vibration impacts associated with the construction and operations of the Proposed Project. Construction-Related Vibration Impacts Vibration impacts from construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would typically be created from the operation of heavy off-road equipment. The nearest sensitive receptor to the Project Site is a mobile home park located 500 feet north of the Project Site. In addition, the Country Inn & Suites hotel is located 85 feet south of the Project Site. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-55 Environmental Analysis The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a bulldozer. A large bulldozer would create a vibration level of 0.089 inch per second PPV at 25 feet. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest off-site receptor (Country Inn & Suites) would be 0.02 inch per second PPV, which would be less than the 0.2 inch per second PPV threshold. Therefore, construction-related vibration impacts would be less than significant. Operations-Related Vibration Impacts On-going operation of the Proposed Project would not include the operation of any known vibration sources that may affect nearby properties. However, the Proposed Project would place sensitive receptors (hotel rooms) 75 feet from the edge of I-5, which is a known source of vibration. Caltrans has done extensive research on vibration created along freeways and State Routes, and their vibration measurements of roads have never exceeded 0.08 inch per second PPV at 15 feet from the center of the nearest lane, with the worst combinations of heavy trucks. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest proposed hotel rooms would be 0.01 inch per second PPV, which would be less than the 0.2 inch per second PPV threshold. Therefore, operations-related vibration impacts would be less than significant. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? The ongoing operation of the Proposed Project may result in a potential substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above existing levels without the Proposed Project. Potential noise impacts associated with operation of the Proposed Project would be from project-generated vehicular traffic on the nearby roadways and from on-site activities. Project-Generated Roadway Vehicle Noise Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by a vehicle’s engine, exhaust, and tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors: (1) the volume of traffic; (2) the speed of traffic; and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The Proposed Project does not propose any uses that would require a substantial number of truck trips, and it would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway, so the Proposed Project’s potential off-site noise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume of traffic that would occur with development of the Proposed Project. Policy 3 under Goal 2.I of the City’s General Plan Noise Element requires new development that generates increased traffic and subsequent increases in noise to noise-sensitive land uses to provide appropriate mitigation. However, since the City of Anaheim General Plan does not define what increase in roadway noise would be considered significant, the noise increase thresholds detailed in EIR 340 have been utilized in this analysis. EIR 340 used a mobile-source noise threshold of a 5 dBA increase threshold where the without project roadway noise levels are below 65 dBA CNEL at the nearest homes and a 3 dBA increase threshold where the without project roadway noise levels are 65 dBA CNEL or higher. The Trip Generation Analysis for the Proposed Element Hotel, Anaheim, California (Trip Generation Analysis), prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan, (LLG 2016), found that the Proposed Project would generate a net increase of 698 daily vehicle trips, 61 AM peak hour Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-56 Environmental Analysis vehicle trips, and 56 PM peak hour vehicle trips. The Trip Generation Analysis found that the Proposed Project would not generate enough trips to meet the City’s 100 peak hour trip criteria, where a detailed traffic impact analysis is required. In order for project-generated vehicular traffic to increase the noise level of any nearby roadway by 3 dB, the roadway traffic would have to double. Since all of the nearby roadways currently have more than 700 daily trips, the project- related roadway noise increase to the nearby roadways would be less than the 3 dB increase threshold detailed above. Impacts would be less than significant. Project-Generated On-Site Noise Sources The operation of the Proposed Project may create an increase in on-site noise levels from noise impacts from rooftop mechanical equipment, parking lot activities, and delivery truck activities. The potential noise impacts associated with operation of the Proposed Project has been analyzed previously under Threshold “a”, which found that all of the anticipated noise sources produce noise levels that are more than 16 dB below the existing ambient noise level on the Project Site and would not provide a measurable increase in noise levels to any nearby property. Therefore, the Proposed Project would not result in a substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels, and impacts would be less than significant. It is also noted that the project would comply with Title 24 standards to reduce the potential intrusion of exterior noise (refer to SR 5.10-2). Further, in compliance with the Municipal Code, loading activities would be restricted to between the hours of 6:00 AM to 8:00 PM (SR 5.10-3). Operational noise associated with the proposed hotel would be consistent with what was anticipated and evaluated as part of EIR 311 and EIR 340. Further, as detailed in Section 5.16, Transportation and Circulation, of this Addendum, traffic associated with the Proposed Project would be limited in volume and would be within the traffic volumes anticipated and previously evaluated for the local circulation system in both EIR 311 and EIR 340. Operational noise impacts would be consistent with those identified in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? The Proposed Project may create a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above noise levels existing without the Proposed Project. Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the Proposed Project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, the sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest sensitive receptor to the Project Site is a mobile home park located 500 feet north of the Project Site. In addition, the Country Inn & Suites hotel is located 85 feet south of the Project Site; however, it should be noted that hotels are a commercial use and are not normally considered as sensitive receptors. Proposed Project construction would occur between the hours of 7:00 AM and 7:00 PM on any day, except on Sundays or City-recognized holidays when no noise-generating construction activities shall be permitted in accordance with Section 6.70.010 of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code (SR 5.10-1). Construction noise during the specified hours is exempt from the quantitative noise level limits of the Municipal Code. However, the City construction noise standards do not provide any limits to the noise levels that may be created from construction activities, and, even Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-57 Environmental Analysis with adherence to the City standards, the resultant construction noise levels may result in a significant substantial temporary noise increase to the nearby off-site workers. In order to determine if the proposed construction activities would create a significant substantial temporary noise increase, the Federal Transit Administration (FTA) construction noise criteria thresholds have been used. According to these thresholds, a significant construction noise impact would occur if construction noise exceeds 80 dBA during the daytime at any of the nearby homes or 85 dBA at the nearby hotel uses. Construction noise impacts to the nearest homes and off-site workers at the nearby commercial uses are shown below in Table 9, Worst-Case Construction Noise Levels At Nearest Receptors. TABLE 9 WORST-CASE CONSTRUCTION NOISE LEVELS AT NEAREST RECEPTORS Construction Phase Nearest Home Nearest Hotel Room Distance (feet) Noise Level (dBA Leq) Distance (feet) Noise Level (dBA Leq) Demolition 800 62 90 79 Grading 500 65 85 78 Building Construction 740 43 90 75 Paving 500 66 95 79 Painting 740 50 90 69 FTA Construction Thresholds 80 85 dBA: A-weighted decibels: Leq: average noise level; FTA: Federal Transit Administration. Source: Vista Environmental 2016b. Table 9, Worst-Case Construction Noise Levels At Nearest Receptors, shows that the greatest noise impacts would occur during the demolition and grading phases of construction but would be within the FTA construction noise thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant construction noise impact would occur from development of the Proposed Project. As such, the Proposed Project would not result in a substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the Proposed Project, and impacts would be less than significant. The Proposed Project would implement MMs 5.10-1 through 5.10-12 to ensure that a significant construction-related noise impact would not occur. Therefore, impacts related to construction noise would be the same or less than those identified in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-58 Environmental Analysis e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Similar to the conditions evaluated in EIR 311 and EIR 340, there are no public airports, public use airports, heliports, or private airstrips in the Proposed Project Site vicinity. The Proposed Project would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive levels of aircraft- or airport-related noise. The nearest private airport is Corona Municipal Airport, located approximately 15.3 miles east of the Project Site. The Project Site is located outside of the 65 dBA CNEL noise contours of this airport and site observations at the Project Site found that although aircraft noise is occasionally audible at the Project Site, the noise created by the aircraft is not loud enough to measurably increase the ambient noise levels, which is primarily created by I-5. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the noise analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirements and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.10-1 Prior to issuance of grading and/or building permits, contractor specifications shall include a note indicating that noise-generating construction activities which produce a sound pressure level at any point along the property line in excess of 60 dBA shall be limited to between the hours of 7:00 AM to 7:00 PM on any day, except on Sundays or a City-recognized holiday when no noise-generating construction activities shall be permitted. This requirement is identified in Section 6.70.010 of the City of Anaheim’s Noise Ordinance. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by and on approval of the Director of Public Works or Building Official. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-59 Environmental Analysis SR 5.10-2 Development shall comply with Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations, also known as the California Building Standards Code, which establishes building standards applicable to all occupancies throughout the state. Title 24 requires that new hotels, motels, and multi-family residences be designed to prevent the intrusion of exterior noise so that the interior noise, attributable to exterior sources, shall not exceed the 45 dBA Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) in any habitable room with windows closed. SR 5.10-3 No commercial use shall produce noise associated with continual loading or unloading of heavy trucks at the site between the hours of 8:00 PM and 6:00 AM (Municipal Code Section 18.32.130). Mitigation Measures MM 5.10-1 Ongoing during construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers. MM 5.10-2 Prior to approval of each final site plan issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Division Manager identifying whether noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any, shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise- sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the property owner/developer prior to final building and zoning inspections. MM 5.10-6 Ongoing during construction and project operation, pressure washing operations for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to graffiti or other aesthetical considerations shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 AM and 8:00 PM. MM 5.10-7 Ongoing during construction and project operation, sweeping operations in the parking facilities and private on-site roadways shall be performed utilizing sweeping/scrubbing equipment which operate at a level measured not greater than 60 dBA at the nearest adjacent property line. MM 5.10-9 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels would be less than 65 dBA CNEL for outdoor use areas (including dining patios, pools, playgrounds, or outdoor gathering areas). This requirement can be accomplished through shielding areas behind buildings or the construction of a noise barrier. MM 5.10-10 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall present plans and calculations to the Planning Department, Building Division to demonstrate that noise levels from planned mechanical ventilation equipment, loading docks, trash compactors, and other proposed on-site noise sources are designed to meet the City’s 60 dBA Sound Pressure Levels standard at the property line, and not create a noise increase greater than 5 dBA over existing Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-60 Environmental Analysis ambient noise at the nearest noise sensitive receptor, whichever is more restrictive. MM 5.10-12 Prior to issuance of each building permit if pile driving and blasting is anticipated during construction, a noise and vibration analysis must be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department, Building Division, to assess and mitigate potential noise and vibration impacts related to these activities. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. The following conditions of approval adopted in connection with EIR 311. These COAs also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. COA 23 That prior to the commencement of construction activity, the property owner/developer shall install and maintain specially designed construction barriers at the construction project perimeter areas. The construction sound barriers shall be a minimum height of 8’ with a minimum surface weight of 1.25 lbs per square foot or a minimum Sound Transmission Class Rating (STC) of 25. The structure shall be a continuous barrier. Gates and other entry doors shall be constructed with suitable mullions, astragals, seals or other design techniques to minimize sound leakage when in the closed position. Access doors should be self closing where feasible. Vision ports are permissible providing that are filled with an acceptable solid vision product. COA 25 That pressure washing operations for purposes of building repair and maintenance due to graffiti or other aesthetical considerations shall be limited to daytime hours of operation between 7:00 am and 8:00 pm. 5.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING 5.13.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 determined that the DRSP would result in minimal growth within the city, and, with implementation of PDF 3.9-1, would not create a significant impact to employment, population, or housing. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP has the potential to increase population by approximately 9,099 residents and result in a demand for 2,757 housing units in the City of Anaheim. However, it was identified that the increases related to population and housing would be well within City of Anaheim projections and represent a less than significant impact. Additionally, the creation of 2,757 new households, was assumed in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment (RHNA) prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG). Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-61 Environmental Analysis 5.13.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? Based on development of the Proposed Project with 174 hotel rooms and a generation factor of 1.11 employees per hotel or motel room used in EIR 340, implementation of the Proposed Project would generate approximately 193 employment positions. The Proposed Project would not include development of dwelling units; therefore, it would not result in a direct increase in population. The generation of new employment positions has the potential to indirectly result in new households, thereby indirectly increasing population. Based on a factor identified in EIR 340 that approximately 13.3 percent of new hotel and motel employees would choose to relocate into the City of Anaheim, approximately 26 employees would move their residences to Anaheim, resulting in a need for 26 dwelling units. Assuming 1 employee per household and an average of 3.1 persons per household, the new households would result in 81 new residents. Consistent with the findings in EIR 340, the increase in housing demand and population generation is well within the projections for the City and County. A significant impact related to population or housing would not occur and no mitigation is required. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The current building on the site (formerly Bergstrom Children’s Store) and associated structures would be demolished in order to accommodate the new hotel. The site itself does not serve as housing; therefore, development of the project would not displace any residents and would not necessitate construction of replacement housing. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would be less than what is identified in EIR 311 and EIR 340; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the population and housing analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-62 Environmental Analysis Mitigation No mitigation measures are required. 5.14 PUBLIC SERVICES 5.14.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 Fire Protection EIR 311 reported that the DRSP would increase the demand for fire protection services thus increasing response times; the number of service call responses; and the number of search, rescue, and disaster responses. However, this increased demand would be satisfied with implementation of MMs 3.10.1-1 through 3.10.1-10 to include an additional inspector and plan checker in combination with roadway and intersection improvements. Police Protection According to EIR 311, development of the DRSP would increase the volume of calls for police services. However, implementation of MMs 3.10.2-1 through 3.10.2-6 and MM 3.8-11 would reduce impacts to a level considered less than significant. Schools EIR 311 determined that development of the DRSP would not create any direct impacts to local schools because the Specific Plan does not allow for the construction of new dwelling units. However, school-aged children of project employees would create a potential indirect impact from development of the DRSP that would be mitigated through payment of state-mandated Development Fees (MM 3.10.5-1) and implementation of MM 3.10.5-2. Thus, the potential impacts would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. Parks EIR 311 determined that development of the DRSP would result in increased use of ball fields by project cast (employees). Implementation of MMs 3.10.4-1 and 3.10.4-2 would reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP would create additional demand for police services and fire and/or emergency rescue services. Additionally, buildout of the ARSP would generate new school-aged students and would introduce new borrowers to the Anaheim Public Library service area. Potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels through implementation of MMs 5.12-1 through 5.12-19. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-63 Environmental Analysis 5.14.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? Consistent with the analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340, development of the Project Site with proposed uses would incrementally increase the number of service calls and required responses creating new demands on fire protection personnel and resources. Based on consultation with the City of Anaheim Fire Department (AFD), the project would be located in The Anaheim Resort area and, as such, would be subject to fire protection facilities and paramedic services development impact fees. All fees collected would be used to mitigate potential fire impacts due to new development within The Anaheim Resort area (Lutz 2016). Based on a generation rate of 0.06 annual service calls per room for hotel uses, development of the proposed 174-room hotel would generate an estimated ten new service calls for fire protection or paramedic service per year. Although a significant impact was not identified, the project shall comply with the applicable standard requirement (SR 5.12-1) and mitigation measures (refer to MMs 5.12-5 through 5.12-16) from EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Police protection? Based on consultation with the City of Anaheim Police Department (APD) (Budds 2016), the APD provides all law enforcement services to the project area. The Proposed Project would generate new calls for service, requiring an increase in staffing of officer as well as full-time and part-time civilian support personnel. The funding for new personnel needed to maintain acceptable service levels would come from the City of Anaheim’s General Fund. Property taxes and other fees assessed for the property would contribute to the General Fund revenues. Existing Police Department facilities would be sufficient to serve the additional demand associated with the Proposed Project along with the existing demand of the area; therefore, no impact would occur related to the construction of law enforcement facilities. Although a significant impact was not identified, the project shall comply with applicable mitigation measures from EIR 340 (refer to MMs 5.12-1 through 5.12-4). The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Schools? As stated previously, the Proposed Project does not involve the construction of new dwelling units. Therefore, direct impacts on the Anaheim City School District (ACSD) or the Anaheim Union High School District (AUHSD) are not expected to occur as a result of the project. However, development of the project could produce an indirect impact, generating a population increase of Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-64 Environmental Analysis 81 persons in the City. As detailed in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, of this Addendum, the potential relocation of employees as a result of the Proposed Project could generate a need for 26 dwelling units to be constructed within the City limits. As identified in EIR 340, the current student generation rates used for planning purposes within the City include a rate of 0.3609 student per household for elementary students and 0.0700 student per household for junior high and high school students. These generation factors are a combination of the number of students per average residential dwelling unit, which includes all households, including those with no current students. The anticipated student generation rate for the Proposed Project is detailed in Table 10, Student Generation Rates. TABLE 10 STUDENT GENERATION RATES School District Dwelling Units Student Generation Rate (students per household) No. of New Students ACSDa 26 0.3609 9 AUHSDb 26 0.0700 2 TOTAL 11 ACSD: Anaheim City School District; AUHSD: Anaheim Union High School District. Approximately 11 school-aged students would be generated as an indirect result of the Proposed Project, including nine elementary school students and two junior and high school students. As mandated by Senate Bill 50, payment of fees by the Developer would reduce the potential impacts to the ACSD and the AUHSD to less than significant levels (refer to MMs 5.12-17 and 5.12-18). Therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Parks? One of the key features of the City’s Green Plan (Figure G-1 of the City’s General Plan Green Element) is the identification of Park Deficiency Areas. Park Deficiency Areas reflect those areas that, due to population pressures and limited park opportunities, are underserved by recreational facilities and includes residential areas that are located outside of a ½-mile radius of neighborhood and community parks or a ¼-mile radius of a mini park. Community parks have a service radius of two miles and also serve neighborhood park functions within a ½-mile radius. These areas are based on needs established in the last update of the Parks and Recreation Element, demographic changes since the last update, and future land use and employment trends described in the Land Use Element. The Project Site is not located within an identified Park Deficiency Area. Consistent with the findings of EIR 340, no direct increase in demand for City park lands or recreational facilities would result from project implementation because the project would function primarily as a visitor-serving use. While the project has the potential to indirectly increase the residential base of the city (as detailed in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, of this Addendum), the number of potential new residents associated with the increase in employment positions would be so minor that related impacts to recreational facilities would be less than significant. Further, it is impossible to determine where, within the City, the new residents would choose to locate. No new impacts would occur and no mitigation would be required. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-65 Environmental Analysis The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. e) Other public facilities? Local public services include libraries, post offices, and hospitals. The project would result in an incrementally higher demand for such services; however, these increases would not represent a significant impact. Although no impacts would occur, adherence to previously approved MM 5.12-19 from EIR 340 identified below would ensure that an impact would not occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the public services analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirement and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.12-1 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall provide evidence to the Planning Director/Planning Services Manager of full payment of applicable fire facilities fees as deemed appropriate by the Fire Department. Mitigation Measures MM 5.12-1 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security provisions during both the construction and operative phases for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design including the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (e.g., building design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas). Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-66 Environmental Analysis MM 5.12-2 Prior to the issuance of each building permit for a parking structure, the property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review and approval indicating the provision of closed circuit television monitoring and recording or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department. Said measures shall be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections. MM 5.12-3 Ongoing during project operation, the property owner/developer shall provide private security on the premises to maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to review and approval of the Police Department. The use of security patrols and electronic security devices (i.e., video monitors) should be considered to reduce the potential for criminal activity in the area. MM 5.12-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the project design shall include parking lots and parking structures with controlled access points to limit ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police Department, and shall be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department. MM 5.12-5 Prior to commencement of structural framing on each parcel or lot, onsite fire hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner/developer as required and approved by the Fire Department. MM 5.12-6 Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to the Fire Department for review and approval to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department service requirements. MM 5.12-7 Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to the final building and zoning inspection, plans shall indicate that all buildings, exclusive of parking structures, shall have sprinklers installed by the property owner/developer in accordance with the Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be installed prior to each final building and zoning inspection. MM 5.12-8 Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including: a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of access roads. b. Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing 75,000 pounds. c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required at all entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department. d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of 400 feet apart. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-67 Environmental Analysis e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. MM 5.12-9 Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid their fair share of the funding to accommodate the following, which will serve the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area: a. One additional fire truck company. b. One additional paramedic company. c. Modifications to existing fire stations to accommodate the additional fire units, additional manpower, equipment and facilities. d. A vehicle equipped with specialty tools and equipment to enable the Fire Department to provide heavy search and rescue response capability. e. A medical triage vehicle/trailer, equipped with sufficient trauma dressings, medical supplies, stretchers, etc., to handle 1,000 injured persons, and an appropriate storage facility. The determination of the allocable share of costs attributable to the property owner/developer shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such equipment/facilities among property owners/developers in the Hotel Circle Specific Plan Area, The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area or the otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. (Note: To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic Services Impact Fee Program. Compliance with this Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5496 and Resolution No. 95R-73 dated May 16, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements.) MM 5.12-10 Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department. MM 5.12-11 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan to the Fire Department for review and approval detailing accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow. MM 5.12-12 Prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit, plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as being in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code. MM 5.12-13 Prior to the placement of building materials on a building site, an all-weather road shall be provided from the roadway system to and on the construction site and for fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire Department. Such routes shall be paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-68 Environmental Analysis Fire Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet the requirements of Section 10.204 of the Uniform Fire Code, as adopted by the City of Anaheim. MM 5.12-14 Prior to approval of building plans, the property owner/developer shall provide written evidence to the satisfaction of the Fire Department that all lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates shall be equipped with “knox box” devices as required and approved by the Fire Department. MM 5.12-15 Prior to approval of on-site water plans, unless each commercial building is initially connected to separate fire services, an unsubordinated covenant satisfactory to the City Attorney’s Office shall be recorded prohibiting any individual sale of buildings until separate fire services are installed in the building(s) subject to the sale. MM 5.12-16 Prior to approval of water improvement plans, the water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection services in accordance with Fire Department requirements. MM 5.12-17 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of compliance with Government Code Section 53080 (Schools). MM 5.12-18 Ongoing, the City will work cooperatively with school districts to identify opportunities for new schools and school expansion. MM 5.12-19 Prior to the issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.385, Public Library Facilities Services Areas – Payment of Fees Required. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. The following conditions of approval from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 67 was adopted in connection with EIR 311. This COA also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. COA 10 That prior to the approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to the issuance of each building permit plans shall be reviewed and approved by the Fire Department as being in conformance with the Uniform Fire Code. COA 11 That prior to the placement of building materials on a building site, an all weather road/driving surface shall be provided form the roadway system to and on the construction site and to fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire Department. Such routes shall be paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to Fire Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet the requirements of Section 10.204 of the Uniform Fire Code as adopted by the City of Anaheim. COA 40 That with the exception of the Theme Park and Parking Districts, which are already addressed in the Specific Plan, prior to approval of each Final Site Plan and prior to issuance of each building permit, the Anaheim Police Department shall review Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-69 Environmental Analysis and approve plans for safety, accessibility, crime prevention, and security provisions during both the construction and operative phases. 5.15 RECREATION 5.15.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 does not specifically address recreation; however, as addressed previously in Section 5.14, Public Services and Utilities, EIR 311 did address impacts to parks. As discussed previously EIR 311 determined that development of the DRSP would result in increased use of ball fields by project cast (employees). Implementation of MM 5.10.4-1 and 5.10.4-2 would reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, full buildout or implementation of the ARSP would indirectly increase population by approximately 9,099 residents (8,264 associated with buildout of the C-R District and 835 associated with the convention center expansion within the PR District). Because this increase was identified to take place over the next 20 years and because the ARSP area is not located in a designated Park Deficiency Area, impacts related to the construction or expansion of recreational uses were identified as less than significant. Additionally, EIR 340 concluded that any residential development project within the Residential Overlay Zone would be subject to the Quimby Act, which requires the provision of parkland and/or the payment of fees, thereby ensuring that a significant impact would not occur. 5.15.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? As discussed above in Section 5.14, Public Services, no direct increase in demand for City parklands or recreational facilities would result from project implementation because the project would function primarily as a visitor-serving use. While the project has the potential to indirectly increase the residential base of the city (as detailed above in Section 5.13, Population and Housing), the number of potential new residents associated with the increase in employment positions would be so minor that related impacts to recreational facilities would be less than significant. Further, it is impossible to determine where, within the City, the new residents would choose to locate. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Although a significant impact would not occur, adherence to previously approved SR 5.13-1 from EIR 340 identified below would ensure that an impact would not occur. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-70 Environmental Analysis The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the recreation analysis provided in EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirement was derived from existing regulations, requirements, and standard practices set forth by regional and local agencies. Standard Requirement SR 5.13-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, property owners/developers shall comply with Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 17.08.250, which requires the provision of parkland and/or the payment of fees, consistent with the Quimby Act. Mitigation Measures No mitigation measures are required. 5.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 5.16.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 The evaluation of traffic impacts associated with development of the DRSP in EIR 311 determined that prior to implementation of mitigation, four intersections (Euclid Avenue/Ball Road, Euclid Avenue/Katella Avenue, Harbor Boulevard/Katella Avenue, and Haster Street/ Katella Avenue) would become deficient with a level of service (LOS) E condition in the year 2010. It was determined that implementation of project design features and MMs 3.3-1 through 3.3-6 would reduce impacts to a level considered less than significant. EIR 311 also concluded that significant deficiencies in levels of service would occur if future background traffic growth was not mitigated, or if planned improvements were not implemented. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 As evaluated in EIR 340, traffic impacts associated with buildout of the ARSP would result in significant impacts at 21 area intersections, one arterial segment, and three freeway ramp termini intersections. However, after implementation of the identified MMs 5.14-1 through 5.14-21, these Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-71 Environmental Analysis impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels for all but nine intersections (Euclid Street/Katella Avenue, Disneyland Drive/Ball Road, Disneyland Drive/West Street/Katella Avenue, Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road, Anaheim Boulevard/Haster Street/Katella Avenue, State College Boulevard/Katella Avenue, State College Boulevard/Orangewood Avenue, State College Boulevard/The City Drive/Chapman Avenue, Orangewood Avenue/State Route [SR] 57 Southbound Ramps) and 1 ramp termini intersection (Orangewood Avenue/SR-57 Southbound Ramps). It was identified that these intersections would remain significant and unavoidable because of the infeasibility of mitigation measures due to high project cost or the inability to undertake right-of-way acquisitions as a matter of policy to preserve existing businesses, environmental constraints, or jurisdictional considerations. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential deficiencies. Additionally, EIR 340 indicated no impacts would occur on intersections identified in the Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Orange County. 5.16.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on Appendix J, Trip Generation Analysis, prepared by LLG (2016). Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? According to the Trip Generation Analysis, the Proposed Project is estimated to generate 61 net new trips in the AM peak hour and 56 net new trips in the PM peak hour. Based on the criteria in the City of Anaheim’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies, since the project would not generate over 100 trips in either peak hour, the project would not require a traffic study (LLG 2016). Because the Proposed Project would not require an amendment to the either DRSP or ARSP, potential impacts associated with project development have been addressed through EIR 311 and EIR 340 and no additional analysis is required. Further, implementation of MMs 5.14-2 through 5.14-17 would ensure that a significant impact would not occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? Based on the analysis provided in Section 5.13, Population and Housing, of this Addendum, the indirect increase in population resulting from the Proposed Project would be so minor that it would Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-72 Environmental Analysis not increase air traffic levels through an increase in air travelers. Therefore, the project would not significantly impact air traffic patterns. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? As shown on Exhibit 5, Site Plan, primary vehicular access to the Project Site would be provided via a full-movement access driveway on Alro Way. As part of the project, the Applicant has requested consideration of three variances: (refer to Section 4.3, Discretionary Actions) a variance for a minimum landscape setback along Manchester Avenue, a minimum interior landscape setback, and an increase in the number of permitted wall signs. All internal drive aisle widths, project driveway widths, and parking stall widths are designed to comply with the City’s minimum requirements. Designated pedestrian access would be provided throughout the Project Site via a series of interconnected sidewalks and pedestrian walkways, allowing access to the hotel facilities and parking areas. No new impact would occur related to increased hazards or incompatible uses and no mitigation is required. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? The Project Site is located along Alro Way and is not in the vicinity of an established emergency response or evacuation plan. Construction activity would be confined to the Project Site and would not interfere with vehicle movement or emergency access along this roadway. Impacts related to the addition of project-related traffic would be less than significant; therefore, the project would not interfere with the movement of emergency vehicles along local roadways. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? The Proposed Project would be located near various alternative transportation modes and routes, including transit stops and pedestrian facilities. Existing transit service in the project area is provided by the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA) and Anaheim Resort Transit (ART). OCTA Route 83 is located in the vicinity of the Project Site and provides service from Anaheim to Laguna Hills via I-5 and Main Street. OCTA Route 43 provides service from Fullerton to Costa Mesa via Harbor Boulevard. Bravo Route 543 provides service from the Fullerton Transportation Center to Santa Ana via Harbor Boulevard. OCTA Route 430 provides service from the Anaheim Regional Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC) to Anaheim Resort Area via Katella Avenue, Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-73 Environmental Analysis Harbor Boulevard, and Ball Road. OCTA Route 47 provides service from Fullerton to Balboa via Anaheim Boulevard and Fairview Street. All routes provide service to The Anaheim Resort area, the Anaheim Convention Center, Disneyland, the Disneyland Hotel, and the Anaheim Garden Walk. ART is a fixed route transportation system providing frequent service for residents, employees, and guests of the City of Anaheim and the greater Anaheim Resort area, including the Cities of Anaheim, Garden Grove, and Orange. The Hotel Circle Clementine Line (ART Routes 6, 7, and 8) provides service along Disney Way and Clementine Street in the project vicinity. This route also includes stops at the Disneyland Main Transportation Center area, which offers transfers to all ART routes. The proposed hotel would be required to participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network, including provision of an Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) bus loading/unloading zone, such that ART buses could stop on the property (ART 2016). Pedestrian access to visitor-serving venues, including the Anaheim Convention Center, The Disneyland Resort, and areas throughout The Anaheim Resort, is available via walkways and sidewalks along Disney Way, which connect to other pedestrian-friendly walkways throughout The Anaheim Resort area and The Disneyland Resort. The sidewalk along the east side of Clementine Street would connect via a pedestrian crosswalk to the existing sidewalk along the north side of Disney Way and the existing sidewalk along the east side of Manchester Avenue, eventually connecting to the Project via Alro Way. It is anticipated that hotel guests and employees would utilize these alternative transportation modes and routes, thereby supporting adopted plans or policies related to alternative transportation. No new impacts would occur and no mitigation is required. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the transportation/traffic analysis provided in EIR 340. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. MM 5.14-2 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for each building, the property owner/developer shall pay the appropriate Traffic Signal Assessment Fees and Transportation Impact and Improvement Fees to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by the Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-74 Environmental Analysis property owner/developer. The property owner shall also participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts, which have been established. MM 5.14-3 Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate arterial highway right(s)-of-way adjacent to their property as shown in the Circulation Element of the Anaheim General Plan. MM 5.14-4 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall join and financially participate in a clean fuel shuttle program such as the Anaheim Resort Transit system, and shall participate in the Anaheim Transportation Network in conjunction with the on-going operation of the project. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property that requires participation in these programs ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. MM 5.14-5 Prior to the issuance of grading permits, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department a plan to coordinate rideshare services for construction employees with the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) for review and approval and shall implement ATN recommendations to the extent feasible. MM 5.14-7 Ongoing during construction, if the Anaheim Police Department or the Anaheim Traffic Management Center (TMC) personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair-share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. MM 5.14-8 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner shall record a covenant on the property requiring that ongoing during project implementation, the property owner/developer shall implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office. Objectives of the TDM program shall be: a. Increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests. b. Provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project- generated trips. c. Conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain trip generation, trip origin, and Average Vehicle Ridership. MM 5.14-9 Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall provide to the City of Anaheim Public Works Department for review and approval a menu of TDM program strategies and elements for both existing and future employees’ commute options, and incentives for hotel patrons transportation options, to include, but not be limited to, the list below. The property owner shall also record a covenant on the property requiring that the approved TDM strategies and elements be implemented ongoing during project operation. The form of the covenant shall be approved by the City Attorney’s Office prior to recordation. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-75 Environmental Analysis a. On-site services. Provide, as feasible and permitted, on-site services such as the food, retail, and other services. b. Ridesharing. Develop a commuter listing of all employee members for the purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. c. Vanpooling. Develop a commuter listing of all employees for the purpose of matching numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool or participate in the existing vanpool programs. d. Transit Pass. Promote Orange County Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes through financial assistance and on-site sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. e. Shuttle Service. Generate a commuter listing of all employees living in proximity to the project, and offer a local shuttle program to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. When appropriate, event shuttle service shall also be made available for guests. f. Bicycling. Develop a Bicycling Program to offer a bicycling alternative to employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers should be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area should be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. g. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. Develop a program to provide employees who rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. h. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. Promote an incentive program for ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. i. Work Shifts. Stagger work shifts. j. Compressed Work Week. Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. k. Telecommuting. Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem). l. Parking Management. Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work. m. Access. Provide preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles. n. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. Offer employees financial incentives for ridesharing or using public transportation. Currently, federal law provides tax-free status for up to $65 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-76 Environmental Analysis o. Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Offer employees financial incentives for bicycling to work. p. Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. Offer ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. q. Incentive Programs. Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. MM 5.14-11 Prior to the recordation of a subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, in the event that a parcel is subdivided and there is a need for common on-site circulation and/or parking, prior to recordation of a subdivision map, an unsubordinated covenant providing for reciprocal access and/or parking, as appropriate, approved by the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager, shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning Department. If the reciprocal access is across parcel lines or if public rights of way are required for reciprocal access; Public Works approval shall be required. MM 5.14-12 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit, the location of any proposed gates across a driveway shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Engineer. Gates shall not be installed across any driveway or private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public streets. Installation of any gates shall conform to the current version of Engineering Standard Detail No. 475. MM 5.14-13 Prior to the issuance of building permits, plans shall show that all driveways shall be constructed with a minimum fifteen (15) foot radius curb returns as required by the City Engineer, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. MM 5.14-14 Prior to the issuance of building permits or final map approval, whichever occurs first, security in the form of a bond, certificate of deposit, letter of credit, completion guarantee, or cash, in an amount and form satisfactory to the City Engineer shall be posted with the City to guarantee the satisfactory completion of all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, water facilities, street grading and pavement, sewer and drainage facilities and other appurtenant work, as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with the specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer, as may be modified by the City Engineer. Installation of said improvements shall occur prior to final building and zoning inspections. MM 5.14-19 Prior to the approval of the final subdivision map or issuance of building permits, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall pay the identified fair- share responsibility as determined by the City as set forth in MM 5.14-15. The City shall allocate the property owner/developer’s fair-share contribution to traffic mitigation programs that result in improved traffic flow on the impacted mainline and ramp locations, via an agreement mutually acceptable to Caltrans and the City. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-77 Environmental Analysis MM 5.14-20 Prior to the approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall meet with the Traffic and Transportation Manager to determine whether a bus stop(s) is required to be placed adjacent to the property. If a bus stop(s) is required, it shall be placed in a location that least impacts traffic flow and may be designed as a bus turnout or a far side bus stop as required by the Traffic and Transportation Manager and per the approval of the Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). MM 5.14-21 Prior to the first final building and zoning Inspection every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact that will be responsible for coordinating with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The on-site coordinator shall be the one point of contact representing the project with the ATN. The TDM requirements shall be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. MM 5.14-22 Subsequent to the certification of EIR 340, and prior to the approval of the first Final Site Plan, if the costs of the identified improvements in the Traffic Study Report for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan cannot be covered by the total funding allocation under the existing City fee programs and funding sources, an update of the existing City traffic fee program or other fee programs shall be developed by the City of Anaheim to ensure completion of the recommended improvements. The following conditions of approval were adopted in connection with EIR 311. These COAs would be applicable to the Proposed Project. COA 46 That all driveways shall be constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer with radius curb returns ranging from eight (8) to thirty five (35) feet, unless otherwise approved by the City Engineer. COA 53 That prior to issuance of each building permit, the appropriate Citywide Transportation Impact and Improvement Fee shall be paid to the City of Anaheim in the amount(s) determined by City Council Resolution. Consistent with the Fee Ordinance, fees may be reduced in consideration of right of way dedication and/or Master Plan of Arterial Highway facility construction. COA 54 That prior to issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of their participation in the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN) and Anaheim Stadium Business Center and coordinated with the 1-5 Traffic Management Plan. 5.17 WATER 5.17.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 The analysis of water service impacts in EIR 311 concluded that the capacity of the existing water supply system would be exceeded, resulting in a significant impact. With implementation of the project design features and MMs 3.10.6-1 through 3.10.6-9, this impact would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-78 Environmental Analysis Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 EIR 340 identified that buildout of the ARSP would exceed capacities of existing water facilities; however, this impact would be mitigated to less than significant level. Further, the projected water demand associated with buildout of the ARSP would be accommodated through existing and projected supplies. Implementation of MMs 5.15-1 through 5.15-9 would ensure water conservation measures would be incorporated into future development to ensure that water supplies remain reliable into the future. 5.17.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Require or result in the construction of new water treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? b) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project (including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form) from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? As shown below in Table 11, Proposed Project Water Demand Increase, the Proposed Project would result an increase in water demand. The total water demand projection for the Proposed Project is an increase of 21,750 gallons per day (gpd) or 24.36 acre-feet per year (afy). TABLE 11 PROPOSED PROJECT WATER DEMAND INCREASE Development Area 1 (C-R District) Units Demand Factor* Demand gpd Afy Element Anaheim Hotel 174 rooms 125 gpd/room 21,750 24.36 Total 21,750 24.36 C-R District: Commercial-Recreation District; gpd: gallons per day; afy: acre-feet per year. * Source: Psomas 2009 and 2010. As identified in EIR 340, a sufficient and reliable water supply is available for the City, now and into the future, including a sufficient water supply for the ARSP. These supplies are also sufficient to provide (and account for) growth projected in the 2005 Urban Water Management Plan, the previously approved May 2007 Water Supply Assessment for the Kaiser Permanente Medical Center, and The Platinum Triangle Project and the ARSP. It was determined through analysis detailed in the ARSP’s Water Supply Assessment that water supplies will remain stable in normal, single-dry year, and multiple-dry year scenarios through 2030. The Water Supply Assessment also analyzed a worst-case scenario based on the following assumptions: where demand exceeds supply ranging from (1) a low of 1,350 acre-feet (af) in Year 2020 to 2,660 af in Year 2030 for the 35 percent reduction scenario and (2) a low of 740 af in Year 2010 to 3,850 af in Year 2030 for the 40 percent reduction scenarios. The analyses respectively assumed 35 and 40 percent reduction in State Water Project supplies under normal year, single-dry year, and multiple-dry year scenarios. As stated in the Water Supply Assessment, it is unlikely that these worst-case assumptions would occur. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-79 Environmental Analysis A memorandum was prepared by ARCADIS U.S., Inc. (ARCADIS) in July 2011 to document the consistency of the conclusions regarding water supply reliability presented in the ARSP’s Water Supply Assessment (WSA), prepared in November 2009 and supplemented with a Water Demand and Regional Supply Update memo dated November 29, 2010, as part of the EIR 340, and Anaheim’s 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (2010 UWMP), adopted by the Anaheim City Council in June 2011. On June 14, 2016, the 215 Urban Water Management Plan (2015 UWMP) was adopted which provides a summary of present and future water supplies and demands and provides an assessment of the City’s water resource needs for a 25-year planning period. According to the 2015 UWMP the projected water supplies available to Anaheim through 2040 are sufficient to meet the existing and projected water demands, including those demands associated with the proposed developments identified in the ARSP WSA. While no significant impacts have been identified, the previously approved SR 5.15-1 and MMs 5.15-1 through 5.15-9 for EIR 340 identified below would ensure that water conservation measures are incorporated into the design of the Proposed Project so that water supplies remain reliable into the future. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the water analysis provided in EIR 340. Mitigation The following standard requirement and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following standards and measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirement SR 5.15-1 Prior to the issue of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall be required to prepare and submit to the City for review and approval (1) a Landscape Documentation Package and (2) landscape and irrigation plans with appropriate water use calculations in accordance with the requirements of Anaheim Municipal Code Chapter 10.19, Landscape Water Efficiency. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-80 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures MM 5.15-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during project operation), the property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that water conservation measures are incorporated. The water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the following: a. Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems. b. Use of waterway recirculation systems. c. Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals. d. Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves. e. Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems which use moisture sensors. f. Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels. g. Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers and other water-using appliances. h. Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest. i. Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water conservation. j. Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible. MM 5.15-2 Prior to issuance of each building permit, all water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be subject to the review and final approval of, the Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division and Fire Department. MM 5.15-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80 psi or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property owner/developer’s service. MM 5.15-4 Prior to the issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan which shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The irrigation plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system. The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils, that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies, and that surface runoff and overwatering is minimized. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall include water-conserving features such as low flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water-conserving equipment. The landscaping and irrigation plans shall indicate that separate irrigation lines for recycled water shall be constructed and recycled water will be used when it becomes available. All irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-81 Environmental Analysis MM 5.15-5 Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan and building permits, plans shall specifically show that the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment will be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, aboveground and behind the building setback line in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys and in accordance with Ordinance No. 4156. Prior to the final building and zoning inspections, the water meter and backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division, in accordance with the Final Site Plan and the building permit plans. MM 5.15-6 Prior to issuance of each building permit, unless records indicate previous payment, the appropriate fees for Primary Mains, Secondary Mains and Fire Protection Service shall be paid to the Public Utilities Department, Water Engineering Division in accordance with Rule 15A, and Rule 20 of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules and Regulations. MM 5.15-7 Prior to final building and zoning inspections, a separate water meter shall be installed for landscape water on all projects where the landscape area exceeds 2,500 square feet in accordance with Ordinance No. 5349. MM 5.15-8 Prior to the issuance of the first building permit or grading permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the Public Utilities Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall be amended to include: a. Construction of a new well with a minimum 1,500 GPM capacity to serve The Anaheim Resort Area (tentative location near Ponderosa Park and Orangewood Avenue); and b. Construction of a new 16-inch water main along Harbor Boulevard from Orangewood to Chapman Avenue. MM 5.15-9 Ongoing, the City shall continue to collaborate with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD), its member agencies, and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to ensure that available water supplies meet anticipated demand. If it is forecasted that water demand exceeds available supplies, staff shall recommend to City Council to trigger application of the Water Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, §10.18), as prescribed, to require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by the OrdinanceSections 10.18.070 through 10.18.090, as appropriate. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. 5.18 SEWER 5.18.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 reported that the existing sewer facilities in the area were at capacity and local improvements would be required to accommodate project-related volume increases. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-82 Environmental Analysis Implementation of the recommended improvements in the City’s South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study would also be required to accommodate the development of the DRSP in the future. However, the County Sanitation District of Orange County was determined to have adequate treatment plant capacity to serve the project. Implementation of MMs 3.10.7-1 and 3.10.7-2 outlined in EIR 311 would reduce all impacts to a level considered less than significant. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, the sewer treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) would not be exceeded by buildout of the ARSP. EIR 340 identified that buildout of the ARSP would increase sewage flows in existing sewer lines and trunks serving the area, resulting in several sewer lines becoming deficient; however, this impact would be mitigated to a less than significant level through implementation of MM 5.16-1. Additionally, it was determined that buildout of the ARSP evaluated in EIR 340 would increase sewage flows by approximately 323,656 gallons per day (gpd) in the PR District and 2.1 million gallons per day (mgd) in the C-R District and that these increases in sewage flow would be accommodated by available capacity at Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Treatment Plant No. 1. 5.18.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? The City of Anaheim, including the Project Site, is served by a “comprehensive sanitary sewer system and no sewage flow is discharged which would impact the quality of surface water or groundwater resources” (City of Anaheim 2004b). As noted previously, the Project Site is being developed as a visitor-serving use. The sewage flow from this use would be discharged into the City’s sewer system and conveyed to Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. No pretreatment is required for the sewage flow from the Proposed Project since the proposed land uses would not (1) process any industrial sewage flow; (2) involve dewatering or groundwater cleanup; (3) directly discharge sewage effluent; or (4) engage in other activities that would generate sewage flow requiring treatment beyond what is provided at Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Treatment Plant No. 1. Land uses or activities that may generate sewage flow requiring special treatment shall comply with OCSD’s Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Therefore, implementation of the project would not exceed the Regional Water Quality Control Board’s (RWQCB) sewage flow treatment requirements and related impacts would be less than significant. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? c) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has inadequate capacity to serve the project’s projected demand in addition to the provider’s existing commitments? Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-83 Environmental Analysis Water As discussed previously, the 2015 UWMP documents that Anaheim has sufficient water supplies from local groundwater, recycled supplies, and imported water purchased from Metropolitan Water District of Southern California to meet the projected increase in annual demands of approximately 5,000 af between 2015 and 2040. Given the lower revised demand projections contained in the 2015 UWMP, the plan’s conclusions regarding sufficiency of water supplies to meet projected demands are consistent with the ARSP’s WSA (ARCADIS 2011). Two existing water mains are located proximate to the Project Site. One water main is located in Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street and the other water main extends perpendicular from the Manchester Avenue/Clementine Street water main and exists in Alro Way. It is not anticipated that the Proposed Project would trigger the need for off-site improvements; however, the project would be required to perform a flow test and provide the City with its demand estimates before the adequacy of the existing system in the vicinity of the project could be verified (SR 5.18-1). Adherence to the previously approved SRs and MMs from EIR 311 and EIR 340 identified below would further reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Sewer The following analysis is based on Appendix H, Sewer Study – 200 W. Alro Way Element Hotel City Project Tracking No.: OTH2016-00893 (Sewer Study) prepared by Psomas (2016b). According to the Sewer Study, the existing uses on the Project Site historically discharged 2,601 gallons per day (gpd) of sewage to an existing 8-inch vitrified clay pipe (VCP) sewer that runs along Alro Way. The Proposed Project would be loaded to the same sewer line via the same manhole as under existing conditions. According to the Sewer Study and based on a flow factor of 125 gallons per day per room (gpd/room), the total average daily flow associated with the Proposed Project would be 21,750 gpd, representing a 19,149 gpd increase over existing conditions. Sewage flow from the Project Site would flow from the 8-inch VCP sewer and enter the parallel Katella Avenue sewer system. According to the Sewer Study, the Katella Avenue sewer system is currently deficient in three areas in the northerly Katella Avenue line. However, because the Katella Avenue sewer system consists of two parallel sewer lines running westerly down Katella Avenue interconnected at two locations by small intertie pipes, these two lines act as one system. Because the northerly line is able to flow full before it would spill over into the southerly line, existing deficiencies in either the northerly or southerly lines in Katella Avenue are not problematic. The improvements required to address the existing deficiencies in the parallel Katella Avenue sewer system are part of the recommended Capital Improvement Program in the CCAAMPSS. The development of the Proposed Project contributes to the potential to trigger the identified system wide deficiencies at buildout of the ARSP and DRSP, resulting in a potentially significant impact. However, the Sewer Study indicates that this project will not cause the local (City) sewer collection system to exceed capacity and therefore no project-specific offsite sewer improvements are required at this time. Consistent with the Anaheim Municipal Code, the Applicant would be required to participate in the City’s Infrastructure Improvement [Fee] Program to fund future improvements to the sewer system. Therefore, impacts would be less than significant. Adherence to the previously approved SRs 5.16-1 through 5.16-3 and MM 5.16-1 from EIR 311 and MM 3.10.7-3 from EIR 340 identified below would further reduce potential impacts related to sewer infrastructure. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-84 Environmental Analysis The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the sewer analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation Standard Requirements The following standard requirement, although not identified specifically in either EIR 311 or EIR 340, would be applicable to the Proposed Project. However, because this standard requirement is an existing City requirement, it would not constitute new mitigation. SR 5.18-1 The developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. The following standard requirements and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following standards and measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.16-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide evidence to the Planning Director/Planning Services Manager that all sewage and wastewater disposal into the sewer system shall comply with OCSD’s Wastewater Discharge Regulations, including the procurement of the necessary permits by food service establishments that would be developed in the ARSP area. SR 5.16-2 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of payment to the Planning Director/Planning Services Manager for a sanitary sewer service charge to OCSD. SR 5.16-3 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of payment to the Planning Director/Planning Services Manager for a capital facilities connection charge to OCSD. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-85 Environmental Analysis Mitigation Measures MM 5.16-1 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future sanitary sewer system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval of the City Engineer to assist in determining the following: a. If the development/redevelopment (1) does not discharge into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) does not increase flows or change points of discharge, then the property owner’s/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program. b. If the development/redevelopment (1) discharges into a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) increases flows or changes points of discharge, then the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as recommended by the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspections for the building/structure, whichever comes first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, as determined by the City Engineer, which may include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts for the sanitary sewer system, the property owner/developer shall submit a sanitary sewer system improvement phasing plan for the project to the City Engineer for review and approval which shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system, (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations, (3) construction phasing, and (4) construction estimates. The City recognizes that these improvements will serve not only the applicant but also other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, each of which should contribute its allocable share of the cost of these improvements. To implement this requirement as it applies to other property owners/developers in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, and the service area, the City shall, and shall make appropriate arrangements with other public agencies, if any, to reimburse the applicant to the extent that its contributions for these improvements exceed the applicant's allocable share of the cost. Such arrangements shall include one or more of the following: (1) creation of integrated financing districts; (2) entry into a reimbursement agreement with the applicant; (3) creation of appropriate community facilities districts, assessment districts, and/or use of similar public financing districts and/or mechanisms; and (4) creation of other such mechanisms or districts as may be appropriate to provide for the Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-86 Environmental Analysis reimbursement of these costs. The determination of the allocable share of improvement costs attributable to the applicant and other property owners/developers, and reimbursement amounts, shall be based on an apportionment of the costs of such improvements among property owners/developers, including the applicant, in the Specific Plan area, the Anaheim Resort, or otherwise defined service area, as applicable, depending on the area served. The study shall determine the impact of the project sewer flows for total build out of the project and identify local deficiencies for each project component (i.e., each hotel). The following conditions of approval and mitigation measure from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 67 was adopted in connection with EIR 311. This measure also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. COA 9 That all storm drain, sewer and street improvement plans shall be designed and improvements constructed to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. MM 3.10.7-3 Prior to issuance of the first building permit for development of a facility other than parking in the Future Expansion District, the applicant shall enter into an agreement with the City of Anaheim to pay or cause to be paid its fair share of funding for the following improvements:  The applicable segments of a City sewer replacement or parallel line to an existing 18-inch City sewer line in Orangewood Avenue from the existing 24-inch District trunk sewer line at Ninth Street to a point of west of I-5. This will be necessary for construction of the Future Expansion District or any other developments in the Commercial Recreation Area south of Katella and West of I-5. This mitigation will be readdressed in subsequent environmental review for the Future Expansion District.  A City sewer main replacement or parallel line in Harbor Boulevard from Convention Way to Orangewood Avenue. To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Sewer Impact and Improvement Fee Program for the South Central City Area. Compliance with this Fee Program by the property owner/developer (per Ordinance No. 5490 and Resolution No. 95R-60 dated April 18, 1995) shall satisfy the requirements of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements with the applicant. 5.19 ELECTRICITY 5.19.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 determined that existing electrical facilities were inadequate to accommodate the increased demand for electricity that development of land uses in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan would generate. It was identified that a new substation in addition to MMs 5.10.9-1 through 5.10.9-4 and MMs 3.8-12 would be required to reduce impacts to a level considered less than significant. Additionally, EIR 311 determined the project would contribute to a cumulative impact Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-87 Environmental Analysis related to electricity consumption. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP area would result in an increased demand for electricity. Compliance with the standard requirements and implementation of MMs 5.17-1 through 5.17-4 would reduce anticipated demand through conservation efforts. It is expected that the existing electrical distribution system and future planned improvements would adequately accommodate the anticipated demand, thus resulting in a less than significant impact with mitigation. 5.19.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity? As shown in Table 12, Projected Electrical Consumption, the Proposed Project would result in an increase in the demand for electricity by approximately 1,802,495 kilowatts per hour (kWh) annually, an estimated 4,938 kWh in an average day. The estimated net increase in electrical demand associated with implementation of the Proposed Project is 0.6879 mega volt amp (MVA). The City’s existing electrical distribution system has been designed based on development of the DRSP and buildout of the ARSP area. No impacts would occur and no mitigation would be required. Although no impacts would occur, adherence to previously approved SRs 5.17-1 and 5.17-2 and MMs 5.17-1 through 5.17-4 from EIR 340 identified below would ensure that an impact would not occur. TABLE 12 PROJECTED ELECTRICAL CONSUMPTION Component Area (sf) Load (kWh/sf/yr) Proposed Annual Consumption (kWh)* C-R District 174 Hotel Rooms 137,595 13.1 1,802,495 Total Annual Consumption 1,802,495 Total Average Daily Consumption 4,938 Component Area (sf) Load (volt-amp/sf) Total Demand (volt-amp) C-R District 174 Hotel Rooms 137,595 5 687,975 Total Demand 687,975 or 0.6879 MVA sf: square foot/feet; kWh: kilowatt per hour; yr: year; C-R: Commercial-Recreation; MVA: million volt amp. * All values are rounded to the nearest 1,000 kWh. Source: Anaheim 2012. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-88 Environmental Analysis Mitigation The following standard requirements and mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following standard requirements and measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. Standard Requirements SR 5.17-1 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall be required to demonstrate to the Planning Department, Building Division that building plans meet the applicable Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (24 CCR 6). These standards are updated, nominally every three years, to incorporate improved energy efficiency technologies and methods. The 2008 standards, which were applicable January 1, 2010, are approximately 15 percent more energy efficient than the 2005 Building and Energy Efficiency Standards. SR 5.17-2 Prior to issuance of building permits, the property owner/developer shall be required to demonstrate to the Planning Department, Building Division that building plans meet the applicable California Green Building Standards (24 CCR 11). Mitigation Measures MM 5.17-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/develop shall consult with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department, Business and Community Programs Division in order to review energy efficient measures to incorporate into the project design. Prior to the final building and zoning inspection, the property owner developer shall implement these energy efficient measures which may include the following: a. High-efficiency air-conditioning systems with EMS (computer) control b. Variable air volume (VAV) distribution c. Outside air (100%) economizer cycle d. Staged compressors or variable speed drives to flow varying thermal loads e. Isolated HVAC zone control by floors/separable activity areas f. Specification of premium-efficiency electric motors (i.e., compressor motors, air-handling units, and fan-coil units) g. Use of occupancy sensors in appropriate spaces h. Use of compact fluorescent lamps i. Use of cold cathode fluorescent lamps j. Use of light emitting diode (LED) or equivalent energy-efficient lighting for outdoor lighting k. Use of Energy Star® exit lighting or exit signage. l. Use of T-8 lamps and electronic ballasts where applications of standard fluorescent fixtures are identified Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-89 Environmental Analysis m. Use of lighting power controllers in association with metal-halide or high- pressure sodium (high intensity discharge) lamps for outdoor lighting and parking lots n. Consideration of thermal energy storage air-conditioning for spaces or facilities that may require air-conditioning during summer, day-peak periods. o. For swimming pools and spas, incorporate solar heating, automatic covers, and efficient pumps and motors, as feasible. p. Consideration for participation in Advantage Services Programs such as: a. New construction design review, in which the City cost-shares engineering for up to $10,000 for design of energy efficient buildings and systems b. New Construction – cash incentives ($300 to $400 per kW reduction in load) for efficiency that exceeds Title 24 requirements c. Green Building Program – offers accelerated plan approval, financial incentives, waived plan check fees and free technical assistance. MM 5.17-2 Prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install an underground electrical service from the Public Utilities Distribution System. The Underground Service will be installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. Electrical Service Fees and other applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. MM 5.17-3 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans and calculations to the City of Anaheim Planning Department, Building Division, to demonstrate that the energy efficiency of each building will exceed the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings current at the time of application by at least 10 percent. MM 5.17-4 Prior to approval of a Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with the Public Utilities Department to incorporate feasible renewable energy generation measures into the project. These measures may include but not be limited to use of solar and small wind turbine sources on new and existing facilities and the use of solar powered lighting in parking areas. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. 5.20 STORMWATER 5.20.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 EIR 311 concluded that storm drain facilities within the Project Site would not be sufficient to handle increased drainage runoff flows. Implementation of project design features and MMs Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-90 Environmental Analysis 3.10.8-1 through 3.10.8-3 outlined in EIR 311 would reduce impacts to storm drain facilities to a level considered less than significant. Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP has the potential to worsen several existing deficiencies in the City’s storm drain system. However, participation in the City’s Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program would assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies. Additionally, implementation of the MMs 5.18-1 through 5.18-3 would ensure that impacts to regional flood control facilities associated with buildout of the ARSP would be reduced to less than significant levels. As discussed in EIR 340, although all new growth within the ARSP area would occur in compliance with identified mitigation, the City has no control over the growth and storm water contributions of areas outside of its jurisdiction. It was determined that any addition of storm water to the regional storm water system may be cumulatively considerable when combined with potential storm water flow increases from surrounding jurisdictions and the potential cumulative impact could be significant and unavoidable if development in the surrounding jurisdictions occurs without upgrades to the storm water infrastructure. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. 5.20.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? According to the Preliminary Drainage Study (Vista Environmental 2016c) prepared for the Proposed Project, the proposed development would maintain similar drainage patterns to the pre- development condition, except that the easterly portion of the site will no longer drain onto the southerly property. The entire site would be tabled to drain toward the north and overflow onto Manchester Avenue via a proposed parkway drain. The post-development Q’s (runoff rate) would exceed the allowable Q since the post-development condition is more impervious. The proposed private storm drain system would retain the proposed flow from the water quality storm event and detain the proposed flows to match the pre-developed 25-year storm event of 7.0 cfs (Walden & Associates 2016b). Therefore, implementation of the Proposed Project would not exceed the capacity of the local or regional storm drain systems. As a result, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to storm drain capacity. Although no impact would occur, adherence to previously approved MMs 5.18-1 through 5.18-3 from EIR 340 identified below would ensure that an impact would not occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-91 Environmental Analysis Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the stormwater analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. MM 5.18-1 Prior to approval of a final subdivision map, or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies as follows: The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following: a. If the specific development/redevelopment does not increase or redirect current or historic storm water quantities/flows, then the property owner/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to provide storm drainage facilities in 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency. b. If the specific development/redevelopment increases or redirects the current or historic storm water quantity/flow, then the property owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s office of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area. The property owner/developer shall be required to install the storm drainage facilities as recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency prior to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspection for the building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program as determined by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits, reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage system improvement phasing plan for the project shall be submitted by the property owner/developer to the City Engineer for review and approval and shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system; (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations; (3) construction phasing; and, (4) construction estimates. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-92 Environmental Analysis MM 5.18-2 Ongoing, the City shall work with the Orange County Flood Control District (OCFCD) to ensure that flood control facilities are well maintained and capable of accommodating, at a minimum, future 25-year storm flows for City-owned and maintained facilities, and 100-year storm flows for County facilities. Where improvements to local drainage facilities have the potential to increase discharges to County facilities, the City shall analyze potential impacts to County facilities in consultation with the Manager, County of Orange Flood Control Division. Encroachment Permits shall be obtained from the County’s Public Property Permits Section for any activity performed within OCFCD’s right of way. MM 5.18-3 Prior to the issuance of building permits, the City shall require that building plans indicate that new developments will minimize stormwater and urban runoff into drainage facilities by incorporating design features such as detention basins, on- site water features, and other strategies. 5.21 PUBLIC UTILITIES 5.21.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR 311 Natural Gas Service According to EIR 311, Southern California Gas would be able to meet the demand for natural gas created by The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Area. Implementation of MMs 3.10.10-1 through 5.10.10-2 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Additionally, EIR 311 determined the project would contribute to a cumulative impact related to natural gas consumption. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Solid Waste In the analysis of impacts related to solid waste, EIR 311 identified that the Olinda-Alpha landfill had limited available capacity. For this reason, development of the DRSP would create a significant, unavoidable project and cumulative impact, even with implementation of MMs 3.10.3- 1 through 5.10.3-3. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact. Telephone Service EIR 311 indicated that Pacific Bell would accommodate all increased demand for telephone services associated with development of the DRSP without disrupting existing service. Implementation of MM 3.10.11-1 would reduce impacts to less than significant levels. Television Service/Reception It was identified in EIR 311 that cable television service would be accommodated without creating a significant impact. Television reception of residents and businesses without cable television might be impacted by construction of projects within the DRSP. However, implementation of MMs 3.10.12-1 and 3.10.12-2 would reduce potential impacts to less than significant. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-93 Environmental Analysis Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 Natural Gas According to EIR 340, Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) indicated that natural gas service to the ARSP can be provided from an existing gas main that is accessible from various locations in the ARSP area. The service would be provided in accordance with the SCGC’s policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission. Therefore, the ARSP would be served by existing facilities, and no new systems or substantial alterations would be required. Solid Waste Buildout of the ARSP would generate an estimated 109,514 pounds of solid waste per day or approximately 19,986 tons of solid waste annually. Buildout of the ARSP would add approximately 19,986 tons of solid waste annually to existing solid waste facilities and capacity, which would impact the landfill system. However, the buildout of the ARSP could be accommodated within the permitted capacity of the County’s landfill capacity. In addition, once the Alpha Olinda Landfill closes in 2021, capacity would exist for buildout of the ARSP in the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill. No significant impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required; however, implementation of MM 5.19-1 through 5.19-5 would further ensure that adequate solid waste services are provided and that solid waste generation would be minimized. Telephone and Cable Television AT&T would serve the ARSP area. According to EIR 340, it was determined that AT&T can provide telephone, digital cable, and high-speed internet services and that the ARSP area can be served by Time Warner Cable with the existing cable resources available to the site. The infrastructure capacity for telephone service typically expands with new development. Facilities needed to connect the Proposed Project to the existing telephone system may include new conduit, fiber and copper facilities. These improvements would be implemented in accordance with applicable State and local regulations. According to EIR 340, the impact related to additional demand for telephone service is less than significant. 5.21.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas? Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) currently provides natural gas service to the City of Anaheim, including the Project Site (SCGC 2016). Service would be provided in accordance with SCGC’s policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission. Therefore, no new impacts related to the need for new systems or supplies or substantial alterations related to natural gas would occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-94 Environmental Analysis b) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project’s solid waste disposal needs? The Proposed Project would generate additional solid waste during construction and operation of the Proposed Project. Based on a generation factor developed by the OC Waste & Recycling of 0.046 pound per square foot per day, development of the Proposed Project is expected to generate approximately 6,329.370 pounds per day (lbs/day). OC Waste & Recycling has indicated that adequate capacity is available in the Orange County landfill system to serve the Proposed Project (Arnau 2016). Although a significant impact would not occur, implementation of previously approved MMs 5.19-1 through 5.19-5 from EIR 340 identified below would further reduce the volume of solid waste to be disposed of in the landfill system. Therefore, no significant impact related to landfill capacity would result from implementation of the Proposed Project. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Solid waste practices in California are governed by multiple federal, State, and local agencies that enforce legislation and regulations to ensure landfill operations minimize impacts to public health and safety and the environment. OC Waste & Recycling is obligated to obtain a Solid Waste Facilities Permit, a Stormwater Discharge Permit, and a permit to construct and operate gas management systems and meet Waste Discharge Requirements. The Local Enforcement Agency, the SCAQMD, and the California Water Resources Control Board enforce landfill regulations related to health, air quality, and water quality, respectively. The Proposed Project would not inhibit OC Waste & Recycling’s compliance with the requirements of each of these governing bodies, and no new impacts would occur. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service? AT&T currently provides telephone service to the City of Anaheim, including the Project Site (AT&T 2016); however, there are a number of alternative options for telephone service that could adequately serve the Proposed Project. Development of the Proposed Project would create an increase in the demand on the telephone service system. In the Project Site, telephone conduits would be installed in joint trenches. Joint trench design would be provided by the telephone service provider once specific development plans become available. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-95 Environmental Analysis e) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception? Time Warner Cable currently provides cable television, high speed internet, and digital telephone service to the project area. Development of the Proposed Project would create an increase in the demand on these services. Based on the company’s service area, the Project Site is located within the company’s Los Angeles South Division; therefore, the Project Site could be served by Time Warner Cable (TWC 2016). The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The impacts identified for the Proposed Project would not be greater than what was identified in EIR 340 for the Proposed Project Site; therefore, the Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Conclusion Overall, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in EIR 311 and EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures that are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the public utilities analysis provided in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with EIR 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the Proposed Project. MM 5.19-1 Prior to issuance of each building permit; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning Inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Public Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as administered by the City of Anaheim and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to final building and zoning inspection, implementation of said plan shall commence and shall remain in full effect. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation include, but are not limited to: a. Detailing the location and design of on-site recycling facilities. b. Providing on-site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling. c. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for hazardous material disposal. d. Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 5-96 Environmental Analysis In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs, as required by the Public Works Department, including, but not limited to: a. Facilitating recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins. b. Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and storing. c. Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing adequate space for sorting and storing. d. Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection. e. Prohibiting curbside pick-up. MM 5.19-2 Ongoing during project operation, the following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property owner/developer: a. Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and packaging. b. Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard. c. Collection of office paper for recycling. d. Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling. e. Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. MM 5.19-3 Prior to issuance of building permits, plans shall show that trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location acceptable to the City of Anaheim Department of Public Works, Operations Division. On an ongoing basis, trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. MM 5.19-4 Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall demonstrate that the plans include provisions for the installation of trash and recycle receptacles near all benches and near high traffic areas such as plazas, transit stops and retail and dining establishments. MM 5.19-5 Prior to issuance of each grading and building permit, the Property Owner/Developer shall submit to the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager for approval a Construction Waste Management Plan that, at a minimum, specifies that at least 75 percent of non-hazardous construction and demolition debris shall be recycled or salvaged and identifies the materials to be diverted from disposal and whether the materials will be sorted on site or co-mingled. Because the mitigation measures identified in EIR 340 are comparable to applicable mitigation measures identified in EIR 311, this document incorporates the more recently adopted measures from EIR 340. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 6-1 Summary of Findings SECTION 6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS As demonstrated in this Addendum, the proposed Element Anaheim Hotel Project would not result in new significant impacts, nor would it substantially increase the severity of impacts evaluated and determined in EIR 311 and EIR 340. Because the Proposed Project would not meet any of the criteria identified in Section 15162 of the State CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent or supplemental EIR, an Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 is the appropriate document type for the Proposed Project. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 6-2 Summary of Findings This page intentionally left blank Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 7-1 Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340 SECTION 7.0 MITIGATION MONITORING PLAN NO. 340 As discussed previously, the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C was prepared for EIR 340 to identify required mitigation measures intended to mitigate potential impacts associated with buildout of the ARSP. This section presents those mitigation measures along with select mitigation measures from Mitigation and Monitoring Program No. 67 approved in conjunction with EIR No. 311 that would be applicable to the proposed Element Anaheim Hotel Project. Element Anaheim Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 7-2 Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340 This page intentionally left blank Starwood Element Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 3 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Te r m s a n d D e f i n i t i o n s 1. Pr o p e r t y O w n e r / D e v e l o p e r  Th e o w n e r o r d e v e l o p e r o f r e a l p r o p e r t y on t h e E l e m e n t A n a h e i m H o t e l p r o j e c t s i t e . 2. En v i r o n m e n t a l E q u i v a l e n t / T i m i n g  A n y m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e a n d t i m i n g t h e r e o f , s u b j e c t t o t h e a pp r o v a l o f t h e C i t y , w h i c h w i l l have the same or superior re s u l t a n d w i l l h a v e t h e s a m e o r s u p e r i o r ef f e c t o n t h e e n v i r o n m e n t . T h e P l a n n i n g D e pa r t m e n t , i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h a n y a p p r o p r i a te agencies or City departments, sh a l l d e t e r m i n e t h e a d e q u a c y o f a n y p r o p o s e d “ e n v i r o n m e n t a l e q u i v a l e n t t i m in g ” a n d , i f d e t e r m i n e d n e c e s s a r y , m a y r e f e r s a i d d e t ermination to the Planning Co m m i s s i o n . A n y c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h i n f o r m a t i o n r e q u i r e d i n o r de r t o m a k e a d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f en v i r o n m e n t a l e q u i v a l e n c y / t i m i n g shall be borne by the pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r . S t a f f t i m e f o r r e vi e w s w i l l b e c h a r g e d o n a t i m e a n d m a t e r i a l s ba s i s a t t h e r a t e i n t h e C i t y ’ s a d o p t e d Fee Schedule. 3. Ti m i n g  Th i s i s t h e p o i n t w h e r e a m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e m u s t b e m o n i t o r e d f o r c o m p l i a n c e . I n t h e c a s e w h e r e m u l t i p l e a c t i o n i t e m s a r e i n d i cated, it is the first po i n t w h e r e c o m p l i a n c e a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e m u s t b e m o n i t o r e d . On c e t h e i n i t i a l a c t i o n i t e m h a s b e e n c o m p l i e d with, no additional monitoring pu r s u a n t t o t h e M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o ri n g P l a n w i l l o c c u r , a s r o u t i n e C i t y p r a c t i c e s a n d p r o c e d u r e s w i l l e n s u r e t h a t t h e i n t e n t o f th e m e a s u r e h a s b e e n c o m p l i e d w i t h . Fo r e x a m p l e , i f t h e t i m i n g i s “ t o b e s h o w n o n a p p r o v e d b u i l d i n g pl a n s ” s u b s e q u e n t t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t c o n s i s t e n t with the approved plans will be fi n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s p u r s u a n t to t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t t o e n s u r e c o m p l i a n c e . 4. Re s p o n s i b i l i t y f o r M o n i t o r i n g  Sh a l l m e a n t h a t c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e s u b j e c t m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u re ( s ) s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d a n d d e t e r m i n e d a d e q u a t e b y a l l de p a r t m e n t s l i s t e d f o r e a c h m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e . O u t s i d e p u b l i c a g e n cy r e v i e w i s l i m i t e d t o t h o s e p u b l i c a g e n c i e s s p e c i f i e d i n t he Mitigation Monitoring Plan wh i c h h a v e p e r m i t a u t h o r i t y i n c o n j un c t i o n w i t h t h e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e . 5. On g o i n g M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e s  Th e m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s t h a t a r e d e s i g n a t e d t o o c c u r o n a n o n g o i n g ba s i s a s p a r t o f t h i s M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n w i l l b e mo n i t o r e d i n t h e f o r m o f a n a n n u a l l e t t e r f r o m t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r i n J a n u a r y o f e a c h y e a r d e m o n s t r a t i n g h o w c o m p l i a n c e with the subject measure(s) ha s b e e n a c h i e v e d . W h e n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h a m e as u r e h a s b e e n d e m o n s t r a t e d f o r a p e r i o d o f o n e y e a r , m o n i t o r i n g o f t h e m e a s u r e w i l l be deemed to be satisfied an d n o f u r t h e r m o n i t o r i n g w i l l o c c u r . F o r m e a s u r e s t h a t a r e t o be m o n i t o r e d “ O n g o i n g D u r i n g C on s t r u c t i o n , ” t h e a n n u a l l e t t e r w i ll review those measures only wh i l e c o n s t r u c t i o n i s o c c u r r i n g ; m o n i t o r i n g w i l l b e d i s c o n t i n u e d af t e r c o n s t r u c t i o n i s c o m p l e t e . A f i n a l a n n u a l l e t t e r w i l l b e pr o v i d e d a t t h e c l o s e o f c o n s t r u c t i o n . 6. Bu i l d i n g P e r m i t  Fo r p u r p o s e s o f t h i s M i t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n , a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s h a l l b e d e f i n e d as a n y p e r m i t i s s u e d f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a new building or s t r u c t u r a l e x p a n s i o n o r m o d i f i c a t i o n o f a n y e x i s t i n g b u i l d i n g , b u t s h a l l n o t i n c l u d e a n y p e r m it s r e q u i r e d f o r i n t e r i o r t e n a n t i m p r o v e m e n t s o r m i n o r a d d i t i o n s to a n e x i s t i n g s t r u c t u r e o r b u i l d i n g . AD D E N D U M T O F I N A L E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T R E P O R T N O . 3 1 1 A N D S U P P LE M E N T A L E N V I R O N M E N T A L I M P A C T RE P O R T N O . 3 4 0 , E L E M E N T A N A H E I M H O T E L P R O J E C T , MI T I G A T I O N M O N I T O R I N G P L A N N O . 3 4 0 Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 4 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion AE S T H E T I C S MM 5 . 1 - 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g pe r m i t s Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , a l l p l u m b i n g o r o t h e r s i m i l a r p i p e s a n d f i x t u r e s l o c a t e d on t h e e x t e r i o r o f t h e b u i l d i n g s h a l l b e s h o w n on p l a n s a s f u l l y s c r e e n e d f r o m v i e w o f ad j a c e n t p u b l i c r i g h t s - o f - w a y a n d f r o m a d j a c e n t p r o p e r t i e s b y a r c h i t e c t u r a l d e v i c e s a n d / o r ap p r o p r i a t e b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s . A n o t e i n d i c a t i n g t h a t t h e s e i m p r o v e m e n t s w i l l b e i n s t a l l e d pr i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s s h a l l b e s p e c i f i c a l l y s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s su b m i t t e d f o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 3 O n g o i n g O n g o i n g , t he p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e s p o n s i b l e f o r t h e r e m o v a l o f a n y on - s i t e g r a f f i t i w i t h i n 2 4 h o u r s o f i t s a p p l i c a t i o n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 4 P r i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n ap p r o v a l Pr i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n a p p r o v a l , t h e l o c a t i on a n d c o n f i g u r a t i o n o f a l l l i g h t i n g f i x t u r e s in c l u d i n g g r o u n d - m o u n t e d l i g h t i n g f i x t u r e s ut i l i z e d t o a c c e n t b u i l d i n g s , l a n d s c a p e el e m e n t s , o r t o i l l u m i n a t e p e d e s t r i a n a r e a s s h a l l b e s h o w n o n a l l F i n a l S i t e P l a n s . A l l pr o p o s e d s u r f a c e p a r k i n g a r e a l i g h t i n g f i x t u r es s h a l l b e d o w n - l i g h t e d w i t h a m a x i m u m he i g h t o f t w e l v e ( 1 2 ) f e e t a d j ac e n t t o a n y r e s i d e n t i a l p r o p e r t i es . A l l l i g h t i n g f i x t u r e s s h a l l be s h i e l d e d t o d i r e c t l i g h t i n g t o w a r d t h e a r ea t o b e i l l u m i n a t e d a n d a w a y f r o m a d j a c e n t re s i d e n t i a l p r o p e r t y l i n e s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 6 P r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s Pr i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s , r o o t a n d s i d e w a l k b a r r i e r s s h a l l b e pr o v i d e d f o r t r e e s w i t h i n s e v e n f e e t o f p u b l i c s i d e w a l k s . Pl a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , Pl a n n i n g D i v i s i o n MM 5 . 1 - 7 P r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s Pr i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t to t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t a l e t t e r f r o m a l i c en s e d l a n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t c e r t i f y i n g t h a t al l l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s h a v e b e e n i n s t a l l e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h la n d s c a p i n g p l a n s a p p r o v e d i n c o n n e c t i o n w i t h t h e F i n a l S i t e P l a n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 8 O n g o i n g O n g o i n g , a l l o n - s it e n o n - P u b l i c R e a l m l a n d s c a p i n g a n d ir r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s , a n d P u b l i c Re a l m l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s , w i t h i n a r e a i n w h i c h d e d i c a t i o n h a s n o t b e e n ac c e p t e d b y t h e C i t y , s h a l l b e m a i n t a i n e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r , i n co m p l i a n c e w i t h C i t y s t a n d a r d s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 9 O n g o i n g O n g o i n g , a n y t r e e p l a n t e d w i t h i n t he S e t b a c k R e a l m s h a l l b e r e p l a c e d i n a t i m e l y ma n n e r i n t h e e v e n t t h a t i t i s r e m o ve d , d a m a g e d , d i s e a s e d , a n d / o r d e a d . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 1 0 O n g o i n g O n g o i n g , a l i c e n s e d a r b o r i s t s h a l l b e h i r e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o b e re s p o n s i b l e f o r a l l t r e e t r i m m i n g . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 1 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t s Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , u n l e s s r e c o r d s i n d i c a t e p r e v i o u s p a y m e n t , a fe e f o r s t r e e t t r e e p u r p o s e s s h a l l b e p a i d o r c a u s e t o b e p a i d t o t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m ba s e d o n t h e l e n g t h o f s t r e e t f r o n t a g e i n a n a m o u n t a s e s t a b l i s h e d b y C i t y C o u n c i l re s o l u t i o n o r c r e d i t a g a i n s t t h e f e e g i v e n f o r Ci t y a u t h o r i z e d i m p r o v e m e n t s i n s t a l l e d b y th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 5 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5 . 1 - 1 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , a l l a i r c o n d i t i o n i n g f a c i l i t i e s a n d o t h e r r o o f a n d gr o u n d m o u n t e d e q u i p m e n t s h a l l b e s h o w n o n pl a n s a s s h i e l d e d f r o m p u b l i c v i e w a n d th e s o u n d b u f f e r e d t o c o m p l y w i t h C i t y o f An a h e i m n o i s e o r d i n a n c e s f r o m a n y a d j a c e n t re s i d e n t i a l o r t r a n s i e n t - o c c u p i e d p r o p e r t i e s . A n o t e i n d i c a t i n g t h a t t h e s e i m p r o v e m e n t s sh a l l b e i n s t a l l e d p r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s s h a l l b e s p e c i f i c a l l y s h o w n on t h e p l a n s s u b m i t t e d f o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 1 3 P r i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n ap p r o v a l Pr i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n a p p r o v a l , p l a n s s h a l l s h ow t h a t t h e r e a r e l e v at i o n s o f b u i l d i n g s vi s i b l e f r o m o f f - s i t e a r e a s s h a l l b e a r c h i t e c t u ra l l y a c c e n t e d t o p o r t r a y a f i n i s h e d l o o k . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 1 - 1 4 P r i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n ap p r o v a l Pr i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n a p p r o v a l , p l a n s s h a l l s h o w t h a t n o s h u t t l e / b u s / v e h i c u l a r d r o p - o f f ar e a s s h a l l b e p e r m i t t e d i n h o t e l / m o t e l o r v a c a t i o n r e s o r t f r o n t s e t b a c k a r e a . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 3 . 1 2 - 2 (E I R 31 1 , M M P N o . 6 7 ) Pr i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n ap p r o v a l Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s w h i c h i l l u s t r a t e t h a t a l l m e c h a n i c a l eq u i p m e n t a n d t r a s h a r e a s f o r t h e s u b j e c t b u i l d i n g s w i l l b e s c r e e n e d f r o m a d j a c e n t pu b l i c s t r e e t s a n d a d j a c e n t r e s i d e n t i a l a r e a s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 3 . 1 2 - 3 (E I R 31 1 , M M P N o . 6 7 ) Pr i o r t o F i n a l S i t e P l a n ap p r o v a l Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l s u b m i t a l a n d s c a p e an d i r r i g a t i o n p l a n f o r a r e a s o u t s i d e o f t h e th e m e p a r k s . T h i s p l a n s h a l l b e p r e p a r e d by a l i c e n s e d l a n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t . T h e la n d s c a p e p l a n s h a l l i n c l u d e a p h a s i n g p l a n f o r t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n a n d m a i n t e n a n c e o f la n d s c a p i n g a s s o c i a t e d w i t h t h a t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 3 . 1 2 - 5 (E I R 3 1 1 , M M P No . 6 7 ) Pr i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n Th e a p p l i c a n t s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n a l a n d s c a p e a s s e s s m e n t a n d m a i n t e n a n c e d i s t r i c t , i f on e i s e s t a b l i s h e d f o r t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m ’ s C o m m e r c i a l R e c r e a t i o n A r e a . Ci t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e AI R Q U A L I T Y MM 5 . 2 - 1 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t op e r a t i o n On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n , t h e p r o p e r ty o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t me a s u r e s t o r e d u c e e m i s s i o n s t o t h e e x t e n t p r a c t i c a l , s c h e d u l e g o o d s m o v e m e n t s f o r of f - p e a k t r a f f i c h o u r s , a n d u s e c l e a n f u e l f o r v e h i c l e s a n d o t h e r e q u i p m e n t , a s pr a c t i c a b l e Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 2 - 2 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t ev i d e n c e t h a t l o w e m i s s i o n p a i n t s a n d c oa t i n g s a r e u t i l i z e d i n t h e d e s i g n a n d co n s t r u c t i o n o f b u i l d i n g s , i n c o m p l i a n c e wi t h S C A Q M D r e g u l a t i o n s . T h e i n f o r m a t i o n sh a l l b e d e n o t e d o n t h e p r o j e c t p l a n s a n d s p e c if i c a t i o n s . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r sh a l l s u b m i t a n a r c h i t e c t u r a l c o a t i n g s c h e d ul e a n d c a l c u l a t i o n s d e m on s t r a t i n g t h a t V O C em i s s i o n s f r o m a r c h i t e c t u r a l c o a t i n g o p e r at i o n s w o u l d n o t e x c e e d 7 5 p o u n d s p e r d a y av e r a g e d o v e r b i w e e k l y p e r i o d s . T h e c a l c u l a t io n s s h a l l s h o w , f o r e a c h c o a t i n g , t h e su r f a c e a r e a t o b e c o a t e d , g a l l o n s ( o r l i t e r s ) o f c o a t i n g p e r u n i t s u r f a c e a r e a , a n d V O C co n t e n t p e r g a l l o n ( o r l i t e r ) . T h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l a l s o i m p l e m e n t t h e fo l l o w i n g t o l i m i t e m i s s i o n s f r o m a r c h i t ec t u r a l c o a t i n g s a n d a s p h a l t u s a g e : a. U s e n o n s o l v e n t - b a s e d c o a t i n g s o n bu i l d i n g s , w h e r e v e r a p p r o p r i a t e ; b. U s e s o l v e n t b a s e d c o a t i n g s , w h e r e t h e y a r e n e c e s s a r y . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 6 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5 . 2 - 3 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n O n g o i ng d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t m e a s u r e s to r e d u c e c o n s t r u c t i o n - r e l a t e d a i r q u a l i t y i m p a c t s . T h e s e m e a s u r e s s h a l l i n c l u d e , b u t ar e n o t l i m i t e d t o : a. N o r m a l w e t t i n g p r o c e d u r e s ( a t l e a s t t w i c e d a i l y ) o r o t h e r d u s t p a l l i a t i v e m e a s u r e s sh a l l b e f o l l o w e d d u r i n g e a r t h - m o v i n g o p e r a t i o n s t o m i n i m i z e f u g i t i v e d u s t em i s s i o n s , i n c o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m M u n i c i p a l C o d e i n c l u d i n g ap p l i c a t i o n o f c h e m i c a l s o i l s t a b i l i z e r s t o e x p o s e d s o i l s a f t e r g r a d i n g i s co m p l e t e d a n d r e p l a c i n g g r o u n d c o v e r in d i s t u r b e d a r e a s a s q u i c k l y a s pr a c t i c a b l e . b. F o r p r o j e c t s w h e r e t h e r e i s e x c a v a t i on f o r s u b t e r r a n e a n f a c i l i t i e s ( s u c h a s pa r k i n g ) o n - s i t e h a u l r o a d s s h a l l b e w a t e r e d a t l e a s t e v e r y t w o h o u r s o r t h e on - s i t e h a u l r o a d s s h a l l b e p a v e d . c. E n c l o s i n g , c o v e r i n g , w a t e r i n g t w i c e d a i l y , o r a p p l y i n g a p p r o v e d s o i l b i n d e r s , ac c o r d i n g t o m a n u f a c t u r e r ’ s s p e c i f i c a t i o n , t o e x p o s e d p i l e s . d. R o a d w a y s a d j a c e n t t o t h e p r o j e c t s ha l l b e s w e p t a n d c l e a r e d o f a n y s p i l l e d ex p o r t m a t e r i a l s a t l e a s t t w i c e a d a y t o a s s i s t i n m i n i m i z i n g f u g i t i v e d u s t ; a n d , ha u l r o u t e s s h a l l b e c l e a r e d a s n e e d e d i f s p i l l s o f m a t e r i a l s e x p o r t e d f r o m t h e pr o j e c t s i t e o c c u r . e. W h e r e p r a c t i c a b l e , h e a v y d u t y c o n s t r u c ti o n e q u i p m e n t s h a l l b e k e p t o n s i t e w h e n no t i n o p e r a t i o n t o m i n i m i z e e x h a u s t e m i s s i o n s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h v e h i c l e s re p e t i t i o u s l y e n t e r i n g a n d e x i t i n g t h e p r o j e c t s i t e . f. T r u c k s i m p o r t i n g o r e x p o r t i n g s o i l m a t e r i al a n d / o r d e b r i s s h al l b e c o v e r e d p r i o r to e n t e r i n g p u b l i c s t r e e t s . g. T a k i n g p r e v e n t i v e m e a s u r e s t o e n s u r e t ha t t r u c k s d o n o t c a r r y d i r t o n t i r e s o n t o pu b l i c s t r e e t s , i n c l u d i n g t r e a t i n g o n s i t e r o a d s a n d s t a g i n g a r e a s . h. P r e v e n t i n g t r u c k s f r o m i d l i n g f o r l o n g e r t h a n 2 m i n u t e s . i. M a n u a l l y i r r i g a t e o r a c t i v a t e i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s n e c e s s a r y t o w a t e r a n d m a i n t a i n th e v e g e t a t i o n a s s o o n a s pl a n t i n g i s c o m p l e t e d . j. R e d u c e T r a f f i c s p e e d s o n a l l u n p a v e d r o a d s u r f a c e s t o 1 5 m i l e s p e r h o u r o r l e s s . k. S u s p e n d a l l g r a d i n g o p e r a t i o n s w h e n w i n d s p e e d s ( a s i n s t a n t a n e o u s g u s t ) ex c e e d 2 5 m i l e s p e r h o u r a n d d u r i n g f i r s t a n d s e c o n d s t a g e s m o g a l e r t s . l. C o m p l y w i t h S C A Q M D R u l e 4 0 2 , w h i c h st a t e s t h a t n o d u s t im p a c t s o f f s i t e a r e su f f i c i e n t t o b e c a l l e d a n u i s a n c e , a n d S C A Q MD R u l e 4 0 3 , w h i c h r e s t r i c t s v i s i b l e em i s s i o n s f r o m c o n s t r u c t i o n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 7 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion m. U s e l o w e m i s s i o n m o b i l e c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m e n t ( e . g . , t r a c t o r s , s c r a p e r s , do z e r s , e t c . ) w h e r e p r a c t i c a b l e . n. U t i l i z e e x i s t i n g p o w e r s o u r c e s ( e . g . , p o w e r p o l e s ) o r c l e a n - f u e l g e n e r a t o r s r a t h e r th a n t e m p o r a r y p o w e r g e n e r a t o r s , w h e r e p r a c t i c a b l e . o. M a i n t a i n c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m e n t e n g i n e s b y k e e p i n g t h e m p r o p e r l y t u n e d . p. U s e l o w s u l f u r f u e l f o r e q u i p m en t , t o t h e e x t e n t p r a c t i c a b l e . MM 5 . 2 - 4 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h gr a d i n g p e r m i t ( f o r Im p o r t / E x p o r t P l a n ) a n d p r i o r to i s s u a n c e o f d e m o l i t i o n pe r m i t ( f o r D e m o l i t i o n P l a n ) Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h g r a d i n g p e r m i t ( f o r I m p o r t / E x p o r t P l a n ) a n d p r i o r t o i s s u a n c e of d e m o l i t i o n p e r m i t ( f o r D e m o l i t i o n P l a n ) , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t De m o l i t i o n a n d I m p o r t / E x p o r t p l a n s . T h e p l a n s s h a l l i n c l u d e i d e n t i f i c a t i o n o f o f f s i t e lo c a t i o n s f o r m a t e r i a l s e x p o r t f r o m t h e p r o j e c t a n d o p t i o n s f o r d i s p o s a l o f e x c e s s ma t e r i a l . T h e s e o p t i o n s m a y i n c l u d e r e c y c l i n g of m a t e r i a l s o n s i t e , s a l e t o a s o i l b r o k e r or c o n t r a c t o r , s a l e t o a p r o j e c t i n t h e v i c i n i ty o r t r a n s p o r t t o a n e n v i r o n m e n t a l l y c l e a r e d la n d f i l l , w i t h a t t e m p t s m a d e t o m o v e i t w i t h i n O r a n g e C o u n t y . T h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l o f f e r r e c y c l a b l e b u i l d i n g ma t e r i a l s , s u c h a s a s p h a l t o r c o n c r e t e fo r s a l e o r r e m o v a l b y p r i v a t e f i r m s o r p u b li c a g e n c i e s f o r u s e i n c o n s t r u c t i o n o f o t h e r pr o j e c t s , i f n o t a l l c a n b e r e u s e d o n p r o j e c t s i t e . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 2 - 5 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l c o m p l y wit h a l l S C A Q M D o f f s e t r e g u l a t i o n s a n d i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f B e s t A v a i l a b l e C o n t r o l Te c h n o l o g y ( B A C T ) a n d B e s t A v a i l a b l e R e t r o f it C o n t r o l T e c h n o l o g y ( B A R C T ) f o r a n y ne w o r m o d i f i e d s t a t i o n a r y s o u r c e . C o p i e s o f p e r m i t s s h a l l b e g i v e n t o t h e P l a n n i n g De p a r t m e n t . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 2 - 6 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r mi t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l im p l e m e n t , a n d d e m o n s t r a t e t o t h e C i t y , m ea s u r e s t h a t a r e b e i n g t a k e n t o r e d u c e op e r a t i o n - r e l a t e d a i r q u a l i t y i m p a c t s . T h e s e m ea s u r e s m a y i n c l u d e , bu t a r e n o t l i m i t e d to t h e f o l l o w i n g : 1. I m p r o v e t h e r m a l i n t e g r i t y o f s t r u c t u r e s a n d r e d u c e d t h e r m a l l o a d t h r o u g h u s e o f au t o m a t e d t i m e c l o c k s o r o c c u p a n t s e n s o r s . 2. I n c o r p o r a t e e f f i c i e n t h e at i n g a n d o t h e r a p p l i a n c e s . 3. I n c o r p o r a t e e n e r g y c o n s e r v a t i o n m e a s u r es i n s i t e o r i e n t a t i o n a n d i n b u i l d i n g de s i g n , s u c h a s a p p r o p r i a t e p a s s i v e s o l a r d e s i g n . 4. U s e d r o u g h t - r e s i s t a n t l a n d s c a p i n g w h e r e v er f e a s i b l e t o r e d u c e e n e r g y u s e d i n pu m p i n g a n d t r a n s p o r t i n g w a t e r . 5. T o t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e , p r o v i d e da y c a r e o p p o r t u n i t i e s f o r e m p l o y e e s o r pa r t i c i p a t e i n a j o i n t d e v e l o p m e n t d a y c a r e c e n t e r Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 8 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion 6. I n s t a l l f a c i l i t i e s f o r e l e c t r i c v e h i c l e r e ch a r g i n g , u n l e s s i t i s d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a t t h e te c h n o l o g y f o r t h e s e f a c i l i t i e s o r a v a i l a b i l i ty o f t h e e q u i p m e n t c u r r e n t a t t h e t i m e ma k e s t h i s i n s t a l l a t i o n i n f e a s i b l e . MM 5 . 2 - 7 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v el o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a h u m a n h e a l t h r i s k a s s e s s m e n t ( H R A ) f o r a n y p r o p o s e d s e n s i t i v e l a n d u s e s ( a c c o r d i n g to S C A Q M D s t a n d a r d s a t t h a t t i m e ) t o b e l o c a te d w i t h i n 5 0 0 f e e t o f t h e n e a r e d g e o f t h e I- 5 f r e e w a y u n l e s s i t i s d e m o n s t r a t e d t h a t th e h e a l t h r i s k s h a v e b e e n d e t e r m i n e d t o b e ac c e p t a b l e a c c o r d i n g t o t h e s t a n d a r d s o f t h e S C A Q M D a t t h e t i m e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t ap p l i c a t i o n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t BI O L O G I C A L R E S O U R C E S MM 5 . 3 - 1 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f a de m o l i t i o n p e r m i t , g r a d i n g pe r m i t , o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f a d e m o l i t i o n p e r m i t , g r a d i n g p e r m i t , o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , a s u r v e y f o r a c t i v e r a p t o r n e s t s s h a l l b e c o n d u c t e d b y a q u a l i f i e d Bi o l o g i s t a n d s u b m i t t e d t o t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r tm e n t 3 0 d a y s p r i o r t o c o m m e n c e m e n t o f an y d e m o l i t i o n o r c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s d u r i ng t h e r a p t o r n e s t i n g s e a s o n ( F e b r u a r y 1 t o Ju n e 3 0 ) a n d w i t h i n 5 0 0 f e e t o f a f a n p a l m , j u n i p e r , o r c a n a r y i s l a n d p i n e . S h o u l d a n ac t i v e n e s t b e i d e n t i f i e d , r e s t r i c t i o n s d e f i n ed b y a q u a l i f i e d B i o l o g i s t w i l l b e p l a c e d o n co n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s i n t h e v i c i n i t y o f a n y a c t i v e n e s t o b s e r v e d u n t i l t h e n e s t i s n o lo n g e r a c t i v e , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y a q u a l i f i e d Bi o l o g i s t . T h e s e r e s t r i c t i o n s m a y i n c l u d e a 30 0 - t o 5 0 0 - f o o t b u f f e r z o n e d e s i g n a t e d a r o u n d a n e s t t o a l l o w c o n s t r u c t i o n t o p r o c e e d wh i l e m i n i m i z i n g d i s t u r b a n c e t o t h e a c t i v e n e s t . O n c e t h e n e s t i s n o l o n g e r a c t i v e , co n s t r u c t i o n c a n p r o c e e d w i t h i n t h e b u f f e r z o n e . Pl a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , Bu i l d i n g S e r v i c e s Div i s i o n MM 5 . 3 - 2 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f a de m o l i t i o n p e r m i t , g r a d i n g pe r m i t , o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f a d e m o l i t i o n p e r m i t , g r a d i n g p e r m i t , o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , a l e t t e r d e t a i l i n g t h e p r o p o s e d s c h e d u l e f o r v e g e t a t i o n r e m o v a l ac t i v i t i e s s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e P l a n n i ng D e p a r t m e n t , v e r i f y i n g t h a t r e m o v a l s h a l l ta k e p l a c e b e t w e e n A u g u s t 1 a n d F e b r u a r y 2 8 t o a v o i d t h e b i r d n e s t i n g s e a s o n . T h i s wo u l d e n s u r e t h a t n o a c t i v e n e s t s w o u l d b e d i st u r b e d . I f t h i s i s n o t f e a s i b l e , t h e n a qu a l i f i e d B i o l o g i s t s h a l l i n s p e c t a n y t r e e s /s h r u b s w h i c h w o u l d b e i m p a c t e d p r i o r t o de m o l i t i o n , g r a d i n g o r c o n s t r u c t i o n a c t i v i t i e s to e n s u r e n o n e s t i n g b i r d s a r e p r e s e n t . I f a ne s t i s p r e s e n t , t h e n a p p r o p r i a t e m i n i m i z a t i o n m e a s u r e s s h a l l b e d e v e l o p e d b y t h e Bi o l o g i s t . Pl a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , Bu i l d i n g S e r v i c e s Div i s i o n CU L T U R A L R E S O U R C E S MM 5 . 4 - 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h gr a d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h g r a d i n g p e r m i t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a le t t e r i d e n t i f y i n g t h e c e r t i f i e d a r c h a e o l o g i st t h a t h a s b e e n h i r e d to e n s u r e t h a t t h e fo l l o w i n g a c t i o n s a r e i m p l e m e n t e d : a. T h e a r c h a e o l o g i s t m u s t b e p r e s e n t a t t h e p r e - g r a d i n g c o n f e r e n c e i n o r d e r t o es t a b l i s h p r o c e d u r e s f o r t e m p o r a r i l y h a l t in g o r r e d i r e c t i n g w o r k t o p e r m i t t h e sa m p l i n g , i d e n t i f i c a t i o n , a n d e v a l u a t i o n o f a r t i f a c t s i f p o t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t ar t i f a c t s a r e u n c o v e r e d . I f a r t i f a c t s a r e u n c o v e r e d a n d d e t e r m i n e d t o b e Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 9 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion si g n i f i c a n t , t h e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l o b s e r v e r s h a l l d e t e r m i n e a p p r o p r i a t e a c t i o n s i n co o p e r a t i o n w i t h t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v el o p e r f o r e x p l o r a t i o n a n d / o r s a l v a g e . b. S p e c i m e n s t h a t a r e c o l l e c t e d p r i o r t o o r d u r i n g t h e g r a d i n g p r o c e s s w i l l b e do n a t e d t o a n a p p r o p r i a t e e d u c a t i o n a l o r r e s e a r c h i n s t i t u t i o n . c. A n y a r c h a e o l o g i c a l w o r k a t t h e s i t e s ha l l b e c o n d u c t e d u n d e r t h e d i r e c t i o n o f t h e ce r t i f i e d a r c h a e o l o g i s t . I f a n y a r t i f a c t s a r e d i s c o v e r e d d u r i n g g r a d i n g o p e r a t i o n s wh e n t h e a r c h a e o l o g i c a l m o n i t o r i s n o t p r e s e n t , g r a d i n g s h a l l b e d i v e r t e d a r o u n d th e a r e a u n t i l t h e m o n i t o r c a n s u r v e y t h e a r e a . d. A f i n a l r e p o r t d e t a i l i n g t h e f i n d i n g s a n d di s p o s i t i o n o f t h e s p e c i m e n s s h a l l b e su b m i t t e d t o t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r . U p o n co m p l e t i o n o f t h e g r a d i n g , t h e ar c h a e o l o g i s t s h a l l n o t i f y t h e C i t y a s t o w he n t h e f i n a l r e p o r t w i l l b e s u b m i t t e d . MM 5 . 4 - 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h gr a d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h g r a d i n g p e r m i t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a le t t e r i d e n t i f y i n g t h e c e r t i f i e d p a l e o n t o l o g i s t t h a t h a s b e e n h i r e d to e n s u r e t h a t t h e fo l l o w i n g a c t i o n s a r e i m p l e m e n t e d : a. T h e p a l e o n t o l o g i s t m u s t be p r e s e n t a t t h e p r e - g r a d i n g c o n f e r e n c e i n o r d e r t o es t a b l i s h p r o c e d u r e s t o t e m p o r a r i l y h a l t or r e d i r e c t w o r k t o p e r m i t t h e s a m p l i n g , id e n t i f i c a t i o n , a n d e v a l u a t i o n o f f o s s i l s if p o t e n t i a l l y s i g n i f i c a n t p a l e o n t o l o g i c a l re s o u r c e s a r e u n c o v e r e d . I f a r t i f a c t s a r e un c o v e r e d a n d f o u n d t o b e s i g n i f i c a n t , th e p a l e o n t o l o g i c a l o b s e r v e r s h a l l d e t e rm i n e a p p r o p r i a t e a c t i o n s i n c o o p e r a t i o n wi t h t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r fo r e x p l o r a t i o n a n d / o r s a l v a g e . b. S p e c i m e n s t h a t a r e c o l l e c t e d p r i o r to o r d u r i n g t h e g r a d i n g p r o c e s s w i l l b e do n a t e d t o a n a p p r o p r i a t e e d u c a t i o n a l o r r e s e a r c h i n s t i t u t i o n . c. An y p a l e o n t o l o g i c a l w o r k a t t h e s i t e s h a ll b e c o n d u c t e d u n d e r t h e d i r e c t i o n o f t h e ce r t i f i e d p a l e o n t o l o g i s t . I f a n y f o s s i l s a r e d i s c o v e r e d d u r i n g g r a d i n g o p e r a t i o n s wh e n t h e p a l e o n t o l o g i c a l m o n i t o r i s n o t pr e s e n t , g r a d i n g s h a l l b e d i v e r t e d a r o u n d th e a r e a u n t i l t h e m o n i t o r c a n s u r v e y t h e a r e a . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t GE O L O G Y A N D S O I L S MM 5 . 5 - 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t t o th e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g S e r v i c e s D i v i s i o n f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l , d e t a i l e d fo u n d a t i o n d e s i g n i n f o r m a t i o n f o r t h e s u b j e c t b u i l d i n g ( s ) , p r e p a r e d b y a c i v i l e n g i n e e r , ba s e d o n r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s b y a g e o t e c h n i c a l e n g i n e e r . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 5 - 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h fo u n d a t i o n p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h f o u n d a t i o n p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a r e p o r t p r e p a r e d b y a g e o t e c h n i c a l e n g i n e e r t o t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g Se r v i c e s D i v i s i o n f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l , wh i c h s h a l l i n v e s t i g a t e t h e s u b j e c t f o u n d a t i o n ex c a v a t i o n s t o d e t e r m i n e i f s o f t l a y e r s a r e p r es e n t i m m e d i a t e l y b e n ea t h t h e f o o t i n g s i t e an d t o e n s u r e t h a t c o m p r e s s i b i l i t y d o e s n o t u n d e r l i e t h e f o o t i n g . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 0 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion MM 5 . 5 - 3 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s t o t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g S e r v i c e s D i v i s i o n f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l sh o w i n g t h a t t h e p r o p o s e d st r u c t u r e h a s b e e n a n a l y z e d fo r e a r t h q u a k e l o a d i n g a n d de s i g n e d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e m o s t r e c e n t s e i s mi c s t a n d a r d s i n t h e C a l i f o r n i a B u i l d i n g C o d e ad o p t e d b y t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 5 - 4 P r i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n f o r a ho t e l / m o t e l Pr i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n f o r a h o t e l / m o t e l , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a n e a r t h q u a k e em e r g e n c y r e s p o n s e p l a n f o r r e v i e w a n d ap p r o v a l b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . T h e p l a n s h a l l r e q u i r e p o s t e d n o t i c e s i n a l l h o t e l r o o m s on e a r t h q u a k e s a f e t y p r o c e d u r e s a n d i n c o r p o r at e o n g o i n g e a r t h q u a k e t r a i n i n g f o r h o t e l st a f f t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 5 - 5 O n g o i n g d u r i n g g r a d i n g ac t i v i t i e s On g o i n g d u r i n g g r a d i n g a c t i v i t i e s , t h e p r o p e r ty o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t st a n d a r d p r a c t i c e s f o r a l l a p p l i c a b l e c o d e s a n d o r d i n a n c e s t o p r e v e n t e r o s i o n t o t h e sa t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t, B u i l d i n g S e r v i c e s D i v i s i o n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 5 - 6 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g or g r a d i n g p e r m i t s Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g o r g r a d i n g p e rm i t s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l su b m i t t o t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g S e r v i c e s D i v i s i o n g e o l o g i c a n d ge o t e c h n i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n s in a r e a s o f p o t e n t i a l s e i s mi c o r g e o l o g i c h a z a r d s a n d pr o v i d e a n o t e o n p l a n s t h a t al l g r a d i n g o p e r a t i o n s w i l l be c o n d u c t e d i n c o n f o r m a n c e wit h t h e r e c o m m e n d a t i o n s c o n t a i n e d i n t he a p p l i c a b l e g e o t e c h n i c a l i n v e s t i g a t i o n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t HA Z A R D S A N D H A Z A R D O U S M A T E R I A L S MM 5 . 7 - 4 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t gr a d i n g o r d e m o l i t i o n p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t g r a d i n g d e m ol i t i o n p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a p l an f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l o f t h e F i r e De p a r t m e n t w h i c h d e t a i l s p r o c ed u r e s t h a t w i l l b e t a k e n i f p r e v i o u s l y u n k n o w n U S T s , o r ot h e r u n k n o w n h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l o r w a s t e , i s d i s c o v e r e d o n s i t e . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 7 - 6 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t de m o l i t i o n a n d c o n s t r u c t i o n On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t d e m o l i t i o n a n d c o n s t r u c ti o n , i n t h e e v e n t t ha t h a z a r d o u s w a s t e , in c l u d i n g a s b e s t o s , i s d i s c o v e r e d d u r i n g s i t e pr e p a r a t i o n o r c o n s t r u c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l e n s u r e t h a t t h e i d e n ti f i e d h a z a r d o u s w a s t e a n d / o r h a z a r d o u s ma t e r i a l a r e h a n d l e d a n d d i s p o s e d o f i n t h e m an n e r s p e c i f i e d b y t he S t a t e o f C a l i f o r n i a Ha z a r d o u s S u b s t a n c e s C o n t r o l L a w ( H e a l t h an d S a f e t y C o d e , D i v i s i o n 2 0 , C h a p t e r 6 . 5 ) , an d a c c o r d i n g t o t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e C a li f o r n i a A d m i n i s t r a t i v e C o d e , T i t l e 3 0 , Ch a p t e r 2 2 . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 1 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion HY D R O L O G Y A N D W A T E R Q U A L I T Y MM 5 . 8 - 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t gr a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t g r a d i n g o r bu i l d i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a M a s t e r D r a i n a g e a n d R u n o f f M a n a g e m e n t Pl a n ( M D R M P ) f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t , D e v e l o p m e n t Se r v i c e s D i v i s i o n a n d O r a n g e C o u n t y E n v i r o n m e n t a l M a n a g e m e n t A g e n c y . T h e Ma s t e r P l a n s h a l l i n c l u d e , b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o , t h e f o l l o w i n g i t e m s : a. B a c k b o n e s t o r m d r a i n l a y o u t a n d p i p e s i z e , i n c l u d i n g s u p p o r t i n g h y d r o l o g y a n d hy d r a u l i c c a l c u l a t i o n s f o r s t o r m s u p t o an d i n c l u d i n g t h e 1 0 0 - y e a r s t o r m ; a n d , b. A d e l i n e a t i o n o f t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s t o be i m p l e m e n t e d f o r c o n t r o l o f p r o j e c t - ge n e r a t e d d r a i n a g e a n d r u n o f f . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 8 - 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a gr a d i n g p e r m i t fo r s i t e s t h a t di s t u r b m o r e t h a n o n e ( 1 ) ac r e o f s o i l Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g p e r m i t fo r s i t e s t h a t d i s t u r b m o r e t h a n o n e ( 1 ) a c r e o f s o i l , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l o b t a i n c o v e r a g e u n d e r t h e N P D E S S t a t e w i d e In d u s t r i a l S t o r m w a t e r P e r m i t f o r G e n e r a l C o n s tr u c t i o n A c t i v i t i e s f r o m t h e S t a t e W a t e r Re s o u r c e s C o n t r o l B o a r d . E v i d e n c e o f a t t a in m e n t s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e P l a n n i n g De p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g S e r v i c e s D i v i s i o n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 8 - 3 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t op e r a t i o n s On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e f o r t h e fo l l o w i n g : c l e a n i n g o f a l l p a v e d a r e a s n o t m a i n t a i n e d b y t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m o n a mo n t h l y b a s i s , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o , p r iv a t e s t r e e t s a n d p a r k i n g l o t s . T h e u s e o f wa t e r t o c l e a n s t r e e t s , p a v e d a r e a s , p a r k i n g lo t s , a n d o t h e r a r e a s a n d f l u s h i n g t h e d e b r i s an d s e d i m e n t d o w n t h e s t o r m d r a i n s s h a l l b e p r o h i b i t e d . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 8 - 4 P r i o r t o e a c h f i n a l b u i l d i n g an d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o e a c h f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l su b m i t a l e t t e r f r o m a l i c e n s e d l a n d s c a p e a r c h it e c t t o t h e C i t y c e rt i f y i n g t h a t t h e la n d s c a p e i n s t a l l a t i o n a n d i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s h a v e b e e n i n s t a l l e d a s s p e c i f i e d i n t h e ap p r o v e d l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n p l a n s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 8 - 5 P r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n s t a l l pi p i n g o n - s i t e w i t h p r o j e c t w a t e r m a i n s s o t h a t r e c l a i m e d w a t e r m a y b e u s e d f o r la n d s c a p e i r r i g a t i o n , i f a n d w h e n i t b e c o m e s a v a i l a b l e . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t MM 5 . 8 - 6 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g pe r m i t s Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , t h e p r op e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e w r i t t e n ev i d e n c e t h a t a l l s t o r m d r a i n , s e w e r , a n d st r e e t i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n s s h a l l b e d e s i g n e d an d c o n s t r u c t e d t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t NO I S E 5. 1 0 - 1 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n , t he p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l e n s u r e t h a t a l l i n t e r n a l co m b u s t i o n e n g i n e s o n c o n s t r u c t i o n e q u i p m en t a n d t r u c k s a r e f i t t e d w i t h p r o p e r l y ma i n t a i n e d m u f f l e r s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 2 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5. 1 0 - 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v el o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a n o i s e s t u d y p r e p a r e d b y a c e r t i f i e d a c o u s t ic a l e n g i n e e r t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e Bu i l d i n g D i v i s i o n M a n a g e r i d e n t i f y i n g w h e t h e r n o i s e a t t e n u a t i o n i s r e q u i r e d a n d d e f i n i n g th e a t t e n u a t i o n m e a s u r e s a n d s p e c i f i c p e rf o r m a n c e r e q u i r e m e n t s , i f w a r r a n t e d , t o co m p l y w i t h t h e U n i f o r m B u i l d i n g C o d e a n d So u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l Or d i n a n c e . U l t i m a t e no i s e a t t e n u a t i o n r e q u i r e m e n t s , i f a n y , s h a l l d e p e n d o n t h e f i n a l l o c a t i o n o f s u c h bu i l d i n g s a n d n o i s e - s e n s i t i v e u s e s i n s i d e an d s u r r o u n d i n g t h e b u i l d i n g s . A t t e n u a t i o n me a s u r e s s h a l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d b y t h e p r o p e r ty o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r p r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g an d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 0 - 6 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n an d p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n On g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d p r o j e c t o p e r a t io n , p r e s s u r e w a s h i n g o p e r a t i o n s f o r pu r p o s e s o f b u i l d i n g r e p a i r a n d m a i n t e n a n c e du e t o g r a f f i t i o r o t h e r a e s t h e t i c a l co n s i d e r a t i o n s s h a l l b e l i m i t e d t o d a y t i m e h o u r s o f o p e r a t i o n b e t w e e n 7 : 0 0 A M a n d 8 : 0 0 PM . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 0 - 7 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n an d p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n On g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d p r o j e c t o p e r a t io n , s w e e p i n g o p e r a t i o n s i n t h e p a r k i n g fa c i l i t i e s a n d p r i v a t e o n - s i t e r o a d w a y s s h a l l b e p e r f o r m e d u t i l i z i n g s w e e p i n g / s c r u b b i n g eq u i p m e n t w h i c h o p e r a t e a t a l e v e l m e a s u r ed n o t g r e a t e r t h a n 6 0 dB A a t t h e n e a r e s t ad j a c e n t p r o p e r t y l i n e . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 0 - 9 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v el o p e r s h a l l p r e s e n t pl a n s a n d c a l c u l a t i o n s t o t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g D i v i s i o n t o d e m o n s t r a t e th a t n o i s e l e v e l s w o u l d b e l e s s t h a n 6 5 d B A C N E L f o r o u t d o o r u s e a r e a s ( i n c l u d i n g di n i n g p a t i o s , p o o l s , p l a y g r o u n d s , o r o u t d o o r g a t h e r i n g a r e a s ) . T h i s r e q u i r e m e n t c a n b e ac c o m p l i s h e d t h r o u g h s h i e l d i n g a r e a s b e h i n d bu i l d i n g s o r t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n o i s e ba r r i e r . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 0 - 1 0 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v el o p e r s h a l l p r e s e n t pl a n s a n d c a l c u l a t i o n s t o t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g D i v i s i o n t o d e m o n s t r a t e th a t n o i s e l e v e l s f r o m p l a n n ed m e c h a n i c a l v e n t il a t i o n e q u i p m e n t , l oa d i n g d o c k s , t r a s h co m p a c t o r s , a n d o t h e r p r o p o s e d o n - s i t e n o i s e s o u r c e s a r e d e s i g n e d t o m e e t t h e C i t y ’ s 60 d B A S o u n d P r e s s u r e L e v e l s s t a n d a r d a t th e p r o p e r t y l i n e , a n d no t c r e a t e a n o i s e in c r e a s e g r e a t e r t h a n 5 d B A o v e r e x i s t i n g a m bi e n t n o i s e a t t h e n e a r e s t n o i s e s e n s i t i v e re c e p t o r , w h i c h e v e r i s m o r e r e s t r i c t i v e . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 0 - 1 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t i f p i l e d r i v i n g an d b l a s t i n g i s a n t i c i p a t e d du r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t i f p i le d r i v i n g a n d b l a s t i n g i s a n t i c i p a t e d d u r i n g co n s t r u c t i o n , a n o i s e a n d v i b r a t i o n a n a l y s is m u s t b e p r e p a r e d a n d s u b m i t t e d t o t h e Pl a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g D i v i s i o n , t o a s s e s s a n d m i t i g a t e p o t e n t i a l n o i s e a n d vi b r a t i o n i m p a c t s r e l a t e d t o t h e s e a c t i v i t i e s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 3 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion PU B L I C S E R V I C E S 5. 1 2 - 1 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f e a c h Fi n a l S i t e P l a n a n d i s s u a n c e of e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f e a c h F i n a l S i t e P l a n a n d i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p l a n s t o t h e P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d ap p r o v a l f o r s a f e t y , a c c e s s i b i l i t y , c r i m e p r e v e n t i o n , a n d s e c u r i t y p r o v i s i o n s d u r i n g b o t h th e c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d o p e r a t i v e p h a s e s f o r t h e pu r p o s e o f i n c o r p o r a t i n g s a f e t y m e a s u r e s in t h e p r o j e c t d e s i g n i n c l u d i n g t h e c o n c e p t o f c r i m e p r e v e n t i o n t h r o u g h e n v i r o n m e n t a l de s i g n ( e . g . , b u i l d i n g d e s i g n , c i r c u l a t i o n , s i t e pl a n n i n g , a n d l i g h t i n g o f p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e s an d p a r k i n g a r e a s ) . Po l i c e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 2 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r a p a r k i n g st r u c t u r e Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r a p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p l a n s t o t h e P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l in d i c a t i n g t h e p r o v i s i o n o f c l o s e d c i r c u i t t e l e v i s i o n m o n i t o r i n g a n d r e c o r d i n g o r o t h e r su b s t i t u t e s e c u r i t y m e a s u r e s a s m a y b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t . S a i d me a s u r e s s h a l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s . Po l i c e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 3 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t op e r a t i o n On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n , t h e p r o p e r ty o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e p r i v a t e se c u r i t y o n t h e p r e m i s e s t o m a i n t a i n a d e q u a t e s e c u r i t y f o r t h e e n t i r e p r o j e c t s u b j e c t t o re v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l o f t h e P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t . Th e u s e o f s e c u r i t y p a t r o l s a n d e l e c t r o n i c se c u r i t y d e v i c e s ( i . e . , v i d e o m o n i t o r s ) s h o u l d b e c o n s i d e r e d t o r e d u c e t h e p o t e n t i a l f o r cr i m i n a l a c t i v i t y i n t h e a r e a . Po l i c e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 4 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o j e c t d e s i g n s h a l l i n c l u d e p a r k i n g l o t s an d p a r k i n g s t r u c t u r e s w i t h c o n t r o l l e d a c c e ss p o i n t s t o l i m i t i n g r e s s a n d e g r e s s i f de t e r m i n e d t o b e n e c e s s a r y b y t h e P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t , a n d s h a l l b e s u b j e c t t o t h e r e v i e w an d a p p r o v a l o f t h e P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t . Po l i c e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 5 P r i o r t o c o m m e n c e m e n t o f st r u c t u r a l f r a m i n g o n e a c h pa r c e l o r l o t Pr i o r t o c o m m e n c e m e n t o f s t r u c t u r a l f r a m i n g o n e a c h p a r c e l o r l o t , o n s i t e f i r e h y d r a n t s sh a l l b e i n s t a l l e d a n d c h a r g e d b y t h e p r op e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r a s r e q u i r e d a n d ap p r o v e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 6 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h gr a d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h g r a d i n g p e r m i t , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a n em e r g e n c y f i r e a c c e s s p l a n t o t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l t o e n s u r e th a t s e r v i c e t o t h e s i t e i s in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h F i r e D e p a rt m e n t s e r v i c e r e q u i r e m e n t s . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 7 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t ; t o b e im p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o t h e f i n a l bu i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g in s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t ; t o b e i m p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g an d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , p l a n s s h a l l i n d i c a t e t h a t a l l b u i l d i n g s , e x c l u s i v e o f p a r k i n g st r u c t u r e s , s h a l l h a v e s p r i n k l e r s i n s t a l le d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e A n a h e i m M u n i c i p a l C o d e . S a i d s p r i n k l e r s s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d p r i o r t o ea c h f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 8 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , p l a n s s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d t o e n s u r e t h a t de v e l o p m e n t i s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e Ci t y o f A n a h e i m F i r e D e p a r t m e n t S t a n d a r d s , in c l u d i n g : a. O v e r h e a d c l e a r a n c e s h a l l n o t b e l e s s t ha n 1 4 f e e t f o r t h e f u l l w i d t h o f a c c e s s ro a d s . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 4 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion b. B r i d g e s a n d u n d e r g r o u n d s t r u c t u r e s t o be u s e d f o r F i r e D e p a r t m e n t a c c e s s s h a l l be d e s i g n e d t o s u p p o r t F i r e D e p a r t m e n t v e h i c l e s w e i g h i n g 7 5 , 0 0 0 p o u n d s . c. A l l u n d e r g r o u n d t u n n e l s s h a l l h a v e s p r i n k le r s . W a t e r s u p p l i e s a r e r e q u i r e d a t a l l en t r a n c e s . S t a n d p i p e s s h a l l a l s o b e p r o v i d e d w h e n d e t e r m i n e d t o b e n e c e s s a r y by t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . d. A d e q u a t e o f f - s i t e p u b l i c f i r e h y d r a n t s c on t i g u o u s t o t h e S p e c i f i c P l a n a r e a a n d on s i t e p r i v a t e f i r e h y d r a n t s s h a l l b e p r o v id e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r . Th e p r e c i s e n u m b e r , t y p e s , a n d l o c a t i o n s o f t h e h y d r a n t s s h a l l b e d e t e r m i n e d du r i n g b u i l d i n g p e r m i t r e v i e w . H y d r a n t s a r e t o b e a m a x i m u m o f 4 0 0 f e e t a p a r t . e. A m i n i m u m r e s i d u a l w a t e r p r e s s u r e o f 2 0 p s i s h a l l r e m a i n i n t h e w a t e r s y s t e m . Fl o w r a t e s f o r p u b l i c p a r k i n g f a c i l i t i e s s h a l l b e s e t a t 1 , 0 0 0 t o 1 , 5 0 0 g p m . 5. 1 2 - 9 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t, t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l e n t e r in t o a n a g r e e m e n t r e c o r d e d a g a i n s t t h e p r o p e r t y w i t h t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m t o p a y o r ca u s e t o b e p a i d t h e i r f a i r s h a r e o f t h e f u n d i ng t o a c c o m m o d a t e t h e f o l l o w i n g , w h i c h w i l l se r v e t h e A n a h e i m R e s o r t S p e c i f i c P l a n a r e a : a. O n e a d d i t i o n a l f i r e t r u c k c o m p a n y . b. O n e a d d i t i o n a l p a r a m e d i c c o m p a n y . c. M o d i f i c a t i o n s t o e x i s t i n g f i r e s t a t i o n s t o a c c o m m o d a t e t h e a d d i t i o n a l f i r e u n i t s , ad d i t i o n a l m a n p o w e r , e q u i p m e n t a n d f a c i l i t i e s . d. A v e h i c l e e q u i p p e d w i t h s p e c i a l t y t o o l s a n d e q u i p m e n t t o e n a b l e t h e F i r e De p a r t m e n t t o p r o v i d e h e a v y s e a r c h a n d r e s c u e r e s p o n s e c a p a b i l i t y . e. A m e d i c a l t r i a g e v e h i c l e / t r a i l e r , e q u i p p e d w i t h s u f f i c i e n t t r a u m a d r e s s i n g s , me d i c a l s u p p l i e s , s t r e t c h e r s , e t c . , to h a n d l e 1 , 0 0 0 i n j u r e d p e r s o n s , a n d a n ap p r o p r i a t e s t o r a g e f a c i l i t y . Th e d e t e r m i n a t i o n o f t h e a l l o c a b l e s h a r e o f c o s t s a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e b a s e d o n a n a p p o r ti o n m e n t o f t h e c o s t s o f s u c h eq u i p m e n t / f a c i l i t i e s a m o n g p r o p e r t y o w n e r s / d ev e l o p e r s i n t h e H o t e l Ci r c l e S p e c i f i c P l a n Ar e a , T h e D i s n e y l a n d R e s o r t S p e c i f i c P l a n A r ea a n d t h e A n a h e i m R e s o r t S p e c i f i c P l a n Ar e a o r t h e o t h e r w i s e d e f i n e d s e r v i c e ar e a , a s a p p l i c a b l e , d e p e n d i n g o n t h e a r e a se r v e d . No t e : T o i m p l e m e n t t h i s m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e , t h e C i t y h a s a d o p t e d t h e F i r e P r o t e c t i o n Fa c i l i t i e s a n d P a r a m e d i c S e r v i c e s I m p a c t F e e P r o g r a m . C o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h i s P r o g r a m b y th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ( p e r O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 4 9 6 a n d R e s o l u t i o n N o . 9 5 R - 7 3 d a t e d Ma y 1 6 , 1 9 9 5 ) s h a l l s a t i s f y t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h i s M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e , o r t h e C i t y m a y en t e r i n t o a l t e r n a t i v e f i n a n c i n g a r r a n g e m e n t s . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 5 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5. 1 2 - 1 0 P r i o r t o e a c h f i n a l b u i l d i n g an d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o e a c h f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l pl a c e e m e r g e n c y t e l e p h o n e s e r v i c e n u m b e r s i n pr o m i n e n t l o c a t i o n s a s a p p r o v e d b y t h e Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t he p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a Co n s t r u c t i o n F i r e P r o t e c t i o n P l a n t o t h e Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l de t a i l i n g a c c e s s i b i l i t y o f e m e r g e n c y f i r e e q u i pm e n t , f i r e h y d r a n t l o c a t i o n , a n d a n y o t h e r co n s t r u c t i o n f e a t u r e s r e q u i r e d b y t h e F i r e M a r s h a l . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l be r e s p o n s i b l e f o r s e c u r i n g f a c i l i t i e s a c c e p t ab l e t o t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t a n d h y d r a n t s sh a l l b e o p e r a t i o n a l w i t h r e q u i r e d f i r e f l o w . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 2 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f e a c h Fi n a l S i t e P l a n a n d p r i o r t o th e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g pe r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f e a c h F i n a l S i t e P l a n a n d p r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g pe r m i t , p l a n s s h a l l b e r e v i e w e d a n d a p p r o v e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t a s b e i n g i n co n f o r m a n c e w i t h t h e U n i f o r m F i r e C o d e . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 3 P r i o r t o t h e p l a c e m e n t o f bu i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s o n a bu i l d i n g s i t e Pr i o r t o t h e p l a c e m e n t o f b u i l d i n g m a t e r i a l s o n a b u i l d i n g s i t e , a n a l l - w e a t h e r r o a d s h a l l be p r o v i d e d f r o m t h e r o a d w a y s y s t e m t o a n d o n t h e c o n s t r u c t i o n s i t e a n d f o r f i r e hy d r a n t s a t a l l t i m e s , a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . S u c h r o u t e s s h a l l b e p a v e d or , s u b j e c t t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e F i r e De p a r t m e n t , s h a l l o t h e r w i s e p r o v i d e a d e q u a t e em e r g e n c y a c c e s s . E v e r y b u i l d i n g c o n s t r u c t e d m u s t b e a c c e s s i b l e t o F i r e D e p a r t m e n t ap p a r a t u s . T h e w i d t h a n d r a d i u s o f t h e d r i v i n g s u r f a c e m u s t m e e t th e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f Se c t i o n 1 0 . 2 0 4 o f t h e U n i f o r m F i r e C o d e , a s a d o p t e d b y t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 4 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f b u i l d i n g pl a n s Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f b u i l d i n g p l a n s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e w r i t t e n ev i d e n c e t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e F i r e D e p a rt m e n t t h a t a l l l o c k a bl e p e d e s t r i a n a n d / o r ve h i c u l a r a c c e s s g a t e s s h a l l b e e q u i p p e d w i t h “ k n o x b o x ” d e v i c e s a s r e q u i r e d a n d ap p r o v e d b y t h e F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 5 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f o n - s i t e wa t e r p l a n s Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f o n - s i t e w a t e r p l a n s , un l e s s e a c h c o m m e r c i a l b u i l d i n g i s i n i t i a l l y co n n e c t e d t o s e p a r a t e f i r e s e r v i c e s , a n u n s u b o r di n a t e d c o v e n a n t s a t i s f a c t o r y t o t h e C i t y At t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e s h a l l b e r e co r d e d p r o h i b i t i n g a n y i n d i v i du a l s a l e o f b u i l d i n g s u n t i l se p a r a t e f i r e s e r v i c e s a r e i n s t a l l e d i n t h e b u i l d i n g ( s ) s u b j e c t t o t h e s a l e . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 6 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f w a t e r im p r o v e m e n t p l a n s Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f w a t e r i m p r o v e m e n t pl a n s , t h e w a t e r s u p p l y s y s t e m s h a l l b e de s i g n e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o p r o v i d e s u f f i c i e n t f i r e f l o w p r e s s u r e a n d st o r a g e f o r t h e p r o p o s e d l a n d u s e a n d f i r e p r o t e c t i o n s e r v i c e s i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h F i r e De p a r t m e n t r e q u i r e m e n t s . Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 7 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t he p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e pr o o f o f c o m p l i a n c e w i t h G o v e r n m e n t C o d e S e c t i o n 5 3 0 8 0 ( S c h o o l s ) . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 8 O n g o i n g O n g o i n g , th e C i t y w i l l w o r k c o o p e r a t i v e l y w i t h s c ho o l d i s t r i c t s t o i d e n t i f y o p p o r t u n i t i e s fo r n e w s c h o o l s a n d s c h o o l e x p a n s i o n . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 2 - 1 9 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f a bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f a b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l c o m p l y wit h t h e An a h e i m M u n i c i p a l C o d e , S e c t i o n 1 7 . 0 8 . 3 8 5 , P u b l i c L i b r a r y F a c i l i t i e s S e r v i c e s Ar e a s – P a y m e n t o f F e e s R e q u i r e d . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 6 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion TR A N S P O R T A T I O N A N D T R A F F I C 5. 1 4 - 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t bu i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r e a c h bu i l d i n g Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r e a c h b u i l d i n g , t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e a p p r o p r i a t e T r a f f i c S i g n a l A s s e s s m e n t F e e s a n d Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n I m p a c t a n d I m p r o v e m e n t F e e s t o t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m i n a m o u n t s de t e r m i n e d b y t h e C i t y C o u n c i l R e s o l u t i o n i n e f f e ct a t t h e t i m e o f i ss u a n c e o f t h e b u i l d i n g pe r m i t w i t h c r e d i t g i v e n f o r C i t y - a u t h o r i z e d im p r o v e m e n t s p r o v i d e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l a l s o p a r t i c i p a t e i n a l l a p p l i c a b l e re i m b u r s e m e n t o r b e n e f i t d i s t r i c t s, w h i c h h a v e b e e n e s t a b l i s h e d . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 3 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i r s t fi n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r is s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g pe r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i r s t f i n a l s u b d i v i s i o n ma p o r i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i r r e v o c a b l y o f f e r f o r de d i c a t i o n ( w i t h s u b o r d i n a t i o n o f e a s e m e n t s) , i n c l u d i n g n e c e s s a r y c o n s t r u c t i o n ea s e m e n t s , t h e u l t i m a t e a r t e r i a l h i g h w a y r i g h t (s ) - o f - w a y a d j a c e n t t o t h e i r p r o p e r t y a s sh o w n i n t h e C i r c u l a t i o n E l e m e n t of t h e A n a h e i m G e n e r a l P l a n . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 4 P r i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p ec t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l j o i n a n d fi n a n c i a l l y p a r t i c i p a t e i n a c l e a n f u e l s h u t t l e pr o g r a m s u c h a s t h e A n a h e i m R e s o r t T r a n s i t sy s t e m , a n d s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e A n a h e i m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n N e t w o r k i n c o n j u n c t i o n w i t h th e o n - g o i n g o p e r a t i o n o f t h e pr o j e c t . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l a l s o r e c o r d a c o v e n a n t on t h e p r o p e r t y t h a t r e q u i r e s p a r t i c i p a t i o n in t h e s e p r o g r a m s o n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t op e r a t i o n . T h e f o r m o f t h e c o v en a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r to r e c o r d a t i o n . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 5 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f gr a d i n g p e r m i t s Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f g r a d i n g p e r m i t s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p r o v i d e t o th e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t a p l a n t o c o o r d i n a t e r i d e s h a r e s e r v i c e s fo r c o n s t r u c t i o n e m p l o y e e s w i t h t h e A n a h e i m T r a n s p o r t a t i o n N e t w o r k ( A T N ) f o r r e v i e w an d a p p r o v a l a n d s h a l l i m p l e m e n t A T N r e c o mm e n d a t i o n s t o t h e e x t e n t f e a s i b l e . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 7 O n g o i n g d u r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n O n g o i n g du r i n g c o n s t r u c t i o n , i f t h e A n a h e i m P o l i c e D e p a r t m e n t o r t h e A n a h e i m T r a f f i c Ma n a g e m e n t C e n t e r ( T M C ) p e r s o n n e l a r e r e q u i r ed t o p r o v i d e t e m p o r a r y t r a f f i c c o n t r o l se r v i c e s , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a ll r e i m b u r s e t h e C i t y , o n a f a i r - s h a r e b a s i s , if a p p l i c a b l e , f o r r e a s o n a b l e c o s t s a s s o c i a t e d w i t h s u c h s e r v i c e s . Po l i c e D e p a r t m e n t ; Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 8 P r i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l r e c o r d a co v e n a n t o n t h e p r o p e r t y re q u i r i n g t h a t o n g o i n g d u r i n g pr o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n Pr i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r s h a l l r e c o r d a co v e n a n t o n t h e p r o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g t h a t on g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t i m p l e m e n t a t i o n , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l e m e n t a n d a d m i n i s t e r a c o m p r e h e n s i v e Tr a n s p o r t a t i o n D e m a n d M a n a g e m e n t ( T D M ) p r o g r a m f o r a l l e m p l o y e e s . T h e f o r m o f th e c o v e n a n t s h a l l b e ap p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e . O b j e c t i v e s o f t h e T D M pr o g r a m s h a l l b e : a. I n c r e a s e r i d e s h a r i n g a n d u s e o f a l t e r na t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s b y g u e s t s . b. P r o v i d e a m e n u o f c o m m u t e a l t e r n a t iv e s f o r e m p l o y e e s t o r e d u c e p r o j e c t - ge n e r a t e d t r i p s . c. C o n d u c t a n a n n u a l c o m m u t e r s u r v e y t o a s ce r t a i n t r i p g e n e r a t i o n , t r i p o r i g i n , a n d Av e r a g e V e h i c l e R i d e r s h i p . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 7 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5. 1 4 - 9 P r i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s pe c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l pr o v i d e t o t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c W o r k s D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l a me n u o f T D M p r o g r a m s t r a t e g i e s a n d e l e m e n t s f o r b o t h e x i s t i n g a n d f u t u r e e m p l o y e e s ’ co m m u t e o p t i o n s , a n d i n c e n t i v e s f o r h o t e l p a tr o n s t r a n s p o r t a t i o n o p t i o n s , t o i n c l u d e , b u t no t b e l i m i t e d t o , t h e l i s t b e l o w . T h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r s h a l l a l s o r e c o r d a c o v e n a n t o n t h e pr o p e r t y r e q u i r i n g t h a t th e a p p r o v e d T D M s t r a t e g i e s an d e l e m e n t s b e i m p l e m e n t e d on g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n . T h e f o r m of t h e c o v e n a n t s h a l l b e a p p r o v e d b y t h e Ci t y A t t o r n e y ’ s O f f i c e p r i o r t o r e c o r d a t i o n . a. O n - s i t e s e r v i c e s . P r o v i d e , a s f e a s i b l e a n d p e r m i t t e d , o n - s i t e s e r v i c e s s u c h a s th e f o o d , r e t a i l , a n d o t h e r s e r v i c e s . b. R i d e s h a r i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g o f a l l e m p l o y e e m e m b e r s f o r t h e pu r p o s e o f p r o v i d i n g a “ m a t c h i n g ” o f e m pl o y e e s w i t h o t h e r e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e in t h e s a m e g e o g r a p h i c a r e a s a n d w h o c o u l d r i d e s h a r e . c. V a n p o o l i n g . D e v e l o p a c o m m u t e r l i s t i ng o f a l l e m p l o y e e s f o r t h e p u r p o s e o f ma t c h i n g n u m b e r s o f e m p l o y e e s w h o l i v e i n g e o g r a p h i c p r o x i m i t y t o o n e an o t h e r a n d c o u l d c o m p r i s e a v a n p o o l o r pa r t i c i p a t e i n t h e e x i s t i n g v a n p o o l pr o g r a m s . d. T r a n s i t P a s s . P r o m o t e O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( i n c l u d i n g co m m u t e r r a i l ) p a s s e s t h r o u g h f i n a n c i a l a s s i s t a n c e a n d o n - s i t e s a l e s t o en c o u r a g e e m p l o y e e s t o u s e t h e v a r i o u s t r a n s i t a n d b u s s e r v i c e s f r o m th r o u g h o u t t h e r e g i o n . e. S h u t t l e S e r v i c e . G e n e r a t e a c o m m u t e r l i s t i n g o f a l l e m p l o y e e s l i v i n g i n pr o x i m i t y t o t h e p r o j e c t , a n d o f f e r a l o c a l s h u t t l e p r o g r a m t o e n c o u r a g e em p l o y e e s t o t r a v e l t o w o r k b y m ea n s o t h e r t h a n t h e au t o m o b i l e . W h e n ap p r o p r i a t e , e v e n t s h u t t l e s e r v i c e s h a l l a l s o b e m a d e a v a i l a b l e f o r g u e s t s . f. B i c y c l i n g . D e v e l o p a B i c y c l i n g P r o g r a m t o o f f e r a b i c y c l i n g a l t e r n a t i v e t o em p l o y e e s . S e c u r e b i c y c l e r a c k s , l o c k e r s , a n d s h o w e r s s h o u l d be p r o v i d e d a s pa r t o f t h i s p r o g r a m . M a p s o f b i c y c l e ro u t e s t h r o u g h o u t t h e a r e a s h o u l d b e pr o v i d e d t o i n f o r m p o t e n t i a l b i c y cl i s t s o f t h e s e o p t i o n s . g. G u a r a n t e e d R i d e H o m e P r o g r a m . D e v e lo p a p r o g r a m t o p r o v i d e e m p l o y e e s wh o r i d e s h a r e , o r u s e t r a n s i t o r o t h e r m e a n s o f c o m m u t i n g t o w o r k , w i t h a pr e a r r a n g e d r i d e h o m e i n a t a x i , r e n t a l c a r, s h u t t l e , o r o t h e r v e h i c l e , i n t h e ev e n t o f e m e r g e n c i e s du r i n g t h e w o r k s h i f t . h. T a r g e t R e d u c t i o n o f L o n g e s t C o m m u t e Tr i p . P r o m o t e a n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m f o r ri d e s h a r i n g a n d o t h e r a l t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s t o p u t h i g h e s t p r i o r i t y on r e d u c t i o n o f l o n g e s t e m p l o y e e c o m m u t e t r i p s . i. W o r k S h i f t s . S t a g g e r w o r k s h i f t s . j. C o m p r e s s e d W o r k W e e k . D e v e l o p a “ c o m p r e s s e d w o r k w e e k ” p r o g r a m , w h i c h pr o v i d e s f o r f e w e r w o r k d a y s b u t l o n g e r d a i l y s h i f t s a s a n o p t i o n f o r e m p l o y e e s . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 8 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion k. T e l e c o m m u t i n g . E x p l o r e t h e p o s s i b i l i t y o f a “ t e l e c o m m u t i n g ” p r o g r a m t h a t wo u l d l i n k s o m e e m p l o y e e s v i a e l e c t r o n i c m e a n s ( e . g . , c o m p u t e r w i t h m o d e m ) . l. P a r k i n g M a n a g e m e n t . D e v e l o p a p a r k i ng m a n a g e m e n t p r o g r a m t h a t p r o v i d e s in c e n t i v e s t o t h o s e w h o r i d e s h a r e o r us e t r a n s i t m e a n s o t h e r t h a n s i n g l e - oc c u p a n t a u t o t o t r a v e l t o w o r k . m. A c c e s s . P r o v i d e p r e f e r e n t i a l a c c e s s t o h i g h o c c u p a n c y v e h i c l e s a n d s h u t t l e s . n. F i n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r R i d e s h a r i n g a n d/ o r P u b l i c T r a n s i t . O f f e r e m p l o y e e s fi n a n c i a l i n c e n t i v e s f o r r i d e s h a r i n g o r u s i n g p u b l i c t r a n s p o r t a t i o n . C u r r e n t l y , fe d e r a l l a w p r o v i d e s t a x - f r e e s t a t u s f o r u p t o $ 6 5 p e r m o n t h p e r e m p l o y e e co n t r i b u t i o n s t o e m p l o y e e s w h o v a n p o o l o r u s e p u b l i c t r a n s i t i n c l u d i n g co m m u t e r r a i l a n d / o r e x p r e s s b u s p o o l s . o. F i n a n c i a l I n c e n t i v e f o r B i c y c l i n g . O f f e r e m p l o y e e s f i n a n c i a l i n c e n t i v e s f o r bi c y c l i n g t o w o r k . p. S p e c i a l “ P r e m i u m ” f o r t h e P a r t i c i p a t io n a n d P r o m o t i o n o f Tr i p R e d u c t i o n . O f f e r ti c k e t / p a s s e s t o s p e c i a l e v e n ts , v a c a t i o n s , e t c . t o e m p l o y e e s w h o r e c r u i t o t h e r em p l o y e e s f o r v a n p o o l , c a r p o o l , o r o t h e r t r i p r e d u c t i o n p r o g r a m s . q. I n c e n t i v e P r o g r a m s . D e s i g n i n c e n t i v e p r o g r a m s f o r c a r p o o l i n g a n d o t h e r al t e r n a t i v e t r a n s p o r t a t i o n m o d e s s o a s t o p u t h i g h e s t p r i o r i t y o n r e d u c t i o n o f lo n g e s t c o m m u t e t r i p s . 5. 1 4 - 1 1 P r i o r t o t h e r e c o r d a t i o n o f a su b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e of t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o t h e r e c o r d a t i o n o f a s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , i n t h e e v e n t t h a t a p a r c e l i s s u b d i v i d e d a n d t h e r e i s a n e e d f o r co m m o n o n - s i t e c i r c u l a t i o n a n d / o r p a r k i n g , p r i o r t o r e c o r d a t i o n o f a s u b d i v i s i o n m a p , a n un s u b o r d i n a t e d c o v e n a n t p r o v i d i n g f o r r e c i p r o c a l a c c e s s a n d / o r p a r k i n g , a s ap p r o p r i a t e , a p p r o v e d b y t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r o r P l a n n i n g S e r v i c e s M a n a g e r , s h a l l b e re c o r d e d w i t h t h e O f f i c e o f t h e O r a n g e C o un t y R e c o r d e r . A c o p y o f t h e r e c o r d e d co v e n a n t s h a l l t h e n b e s u b m i t t e d t o t h e P l an n i n g D i v i s i o n o f t h e P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t . If t h e r e c i p r o c a l a c c e s s i s a c r o s s p a r c e l l i n e s or i f p u b l i c r i g h t s o f w a y a r e r e q u i r e d f o r re c i p r o c a l a c c e s s ; P u b l i c W o r k s a p p r o v a l s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 1 2 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e fi r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i ng p e r m i t , t h e l o c a t i o n o f a n y p r o p o s e d g a t e s ac r o s s a d r i v e w a y s h a l l b e s u b j e c t t o t h e r e vi e w a n d a p p r o v a l o f t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r . Ga t e s s h a l l n o t b e i n s t a l l e d a c r o s s a n y d r i v e w ay o r p r i v a t e s t r e e t i n a m a n n e r w h i c h ma y a d v e r s e l y a f f e c t v e h i c u l a r t r a f f i c o n t h e ad j a c e n t p u b l i c s t r e e t s . I n s t a l l a t i o n o f a n y ga t e s s h a l l c o n f o r m t o t h e c u r r e n t v e r s io n o f E n g i n e e r i n g S t a n d a r d D e t a i l N o . 4 7 5 . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 1 3 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f bu i l d i n g p e r m i t s Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , p l a n s s h a l l s h o w t h a t a l l d r i v e w a y s s h a l l b e co n s t r u c t e d w i t h a m i n i m u m f i f t e e n ( 1 5 ) f o o t ra d i u s c u r b r e t u r n s a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e C i t y En g i n e e r , u n l e s s o t h e r w i s e a p p r o v e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 1 9 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5. 1 4 - 1 4 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f bu i l d i n g p e r m i t s o r f i n a l m a p ap p r o v a l , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s fi r s t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s o r fi n a l m a p a p p r o v a l , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , se c u r i t y i n t h e f o r m o f a b o n d , c e r t i f i c at e o f d e p o s i t , l e t t e r o f c r e d i t , c o m p l e t i o n gu a r a n t e e , o r c a s h , i n a n a m o u n t a n d f o r m s a t i s f a c t o r y t o t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r s h a l l b e po s t e d w i t h t h e C i t y t o g u a r a n t e e t h e s a ti s f a c t o r y c o m p l e t i o n o f a l l e n g i n e e r i n g re q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m , i n c l u d in g p r e p a r a t i o n o f i m p r o v e m e n t p l a n s a n d in s t a l l a t i o n o f a l l i m p r o v e m e n t s , s u c h a s cu r b s a n d g u t t e r s , s i d e w a l k s , w a t e r f a c i l i t i e s , st r e e t g r a d i n g a n d p a v e m e n t , s e w e r a n d d r a i n a g e f a c i l i t i e s a n d o t h e r a p p u r t e n a n t w o r k , as r e q u i r e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r a n d i n a c c o r da n c e w i t h t h e s p e c i f i c a t io n s o n f i l e i n t h e of f i c e o f t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r , a s m a y b e m o d i f i e d b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r . I n s t a l l a t i o n o f s a i d im p r o v e m e n t s s h a l l o c c u r p r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 1 9 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e fi n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r is s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i n a l s u b d i v is i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l p a y t h e i d e n t i f i e d f a i r - s h a r e re s p o n s i b i l i t y a s d e t e r m i n e d b y t h e C i t y a s s e t f o r t h i n M M 5 . 1 4 - 1 5 . T h e C i t y s h a l l al l o c a t e t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s f a i r - s h a r e c o n t r i b u t i o n t o t r a f f i c m i t i g a t i o n pr o g r a m s t h a t r e s u l t i n i m p r o v e d t r a f f i c f l o w o n t h e i m p a c t e d m a i n l i n e a n d r a m p lo c a t i o n s , v i a a n a g r e e m e n t m u t u a l l y a c c e p t a b l e t o C a l t r a n s a n d t h e C i t y . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 2 0 P r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f a Fi n a l S i t e P l a n Pr i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f a F i n a l S i t e P l a n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l m e e t w i t h th e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r t o d e t e rm i n e w h e t h e r a b u s s t o p ( s ) i s r e q u i r e d to b e p l a c e d a d j a c e n t t o t h e p r o p e r t y . I f a b u s st o p ( s ) i s r e q u i r e d , i t s h a l l b e p l a c e d i n a lo c a t i o n t h a t l e a s t i m p a c t s t r a f f i c f l o w a n d ma y b e d e s i g n e d a s a b u s t u r n o u t o r a f a r si d e b u s s t o p a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e T r a f f i c a n d T r a n s p o r t a t i o n M a n a g e r a n d p e r t h e ap p r o v a l o f t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y T r a n s po r t a t i o n A u t h o r i t y ( O C T A ) . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 2 1 P r i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g an d z o n i n g I n s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o t h e f i r s t f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g I n s p e c t i o n e v e r y p r o p e r t y o w n e r a n d / o r l e s s e e sh a l l d e s i g n a t e a n o n - s i t e c o n t a c t t h a t w i l l be r e s p o n s i b l e f o r c o o r d i n a t i n g w i t h t h e A T N an d i m p l e m e n t i n g a l l t r i p m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s . Th e o n - s i t e c o o r d i n a t o r s h a l l b e t h e o n e po i n t o f c o n t a c t r e p r es e n t i n g t h e p r o j e c t w i t h t h e A T N . T h e T D M r e q u i r e m e n t s s h a l l b e in c l u d e d i n t h e l e a s e o r o t h e r a g r e e m e n t w i t h a l l o f t h e p r o j e c t p a r t i c i p a n t s . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 4 - 2 2 S u b s e q u e n t t o t h e ce r t i f i c a t i o n o f F i n a l E I R N o . 34 0 , a n d p r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l of t h e f i r s t F i n a l S i t e P l a n Su b s e q u e n t t o t h e c e r t i f i c a t i on o f F i n a l E I R N o . 3 4 0 , a n d p r i o r t o t h e a p p r o v a l o f t h e f i r s t Fi n a l S i t e P l a n , i f t h e c o s t s of t h e i d e n t i f i e d i m p r ov e m e n t s i n t h e T r a f f i c S t u d y R e p o r t f o r Am e n d m e n t N o . 1 4 t o t h e A n a h e i m R e s o r t S p e c i f ic P l a n c a n n o t b e c o v e r e d b y t h e t o t a l fu n d i n g a l l o c a t i o n u n d e r t h e e x i s t i n g C i t y f e e p r o g r a m s a n d f u n d i n g s o u r c e s , a n u p d a t e of t h e e x i s t i n g C i t y t r a f f i c f e e p r o g r a m o r ot h e r f e e p r o g r a m s s h a l l b e d e v e l o p e d b y t h e Ci t y o f A n a h e i m t o e n s u r e c o m p l e t i o n o f t h e r e c o m m e n d e d i m p r o v e m e n t s . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 0 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion WA T E R 5. 1 5 - 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t ( t o b e im p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o f i n a l bu i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g in s p e c t i o n s , a n d c o n t i n u i n g on a n o n - g o i n g b a s i s d u r i n g pr o j e c t o p e r a t i o n ) Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t ( t o b e i m p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s , a n d c o n t i n u i n g o n a n o n - go i n g b a s i s d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i o n ) , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t t o th e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t p l a n s f o r re v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l w h i c h s h a l l e n s u r e th a t w a t e r c o n s e r v a t i o n m e a s u r e s a r e in c o r p o r a t e d . T h e w a t e r c o n s e r v a t i o n m e a s u r e s t o b e s h o w n o n t h e p l a n s a n d im p l e m e n t e d b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r , to t h e e x t e n t a p p l i c a b l e i n c l u d e , b u t a r e no t l i m i t e d t o , t h e f o l l o w i n g : a. U s e o f l o w - f l o w s p r i n k l e r h e a d s i n i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s . b. U s e o f w a t e r w a y r e c i r c u l a t i o n s y s t e m s . c. L o w - f l o w f i t t i n g s , f i x t u r e s , a n d e q u i p m e n t , i n c l u d i n g l o w f l u s h t o i l e t s a n d u r i n a l s . d. U s e o f s e l f - c l o s i n g v a l v e s o n d r i n k i n g v a l v e s . e. U s e o f e f f i c i e n t i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s s u c h as d r i p i r r i g a t i o n a n d a u t o m a t i c s y s t e m s wh i c h u s e m o i s t u r e s e n s o r s . f. U s e o f l o w - f l o w s h o w e r h e a d s i n h o t e l s . g. W a t e r e f f i c i e n t i c e - m a c h i n e s , d i s h w a s h e r s , c l o t h e s w a s h e r s a n d o t h e r w a t e r - us i n g a p p l i a n c e s . h. U s e o f i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s p r i m a r i l y a t n i g h t w h e n e v a p o r a t i o n r a t e s a r e l o w e s t . i. P r o v i d e i n f o r m a t i o n t o t h e p u b l i c i n c o n s p i c u o u s p l a c e s r e g a r d i n g w a t e r co n s e r v a t i o n . j. U s e o f w a t e r c o n s e r v i n g l a n d s c a p e p l a n t m a t e r i a l s w h e r e v e r f e a s i b l e . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 5 - 2 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , a l l w a t e r s u p p l y p l a n n i n g f o r t h e p r o j e c t w i l l b e cl o s e l y c o o r d i n a t e d w i t h , a n d b e s u b j e c t t o t he r e v i e w a n d f i n a l a p p r o v a l o f , t h e U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t , W a t e r E n g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n a n d F i r e D e p a r t m e n t . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t Fi r e D e p a r t m e n t 5. 1 5 - 3 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , w a t e r p r e s s u r e g r e a t e r t h a n 8 0 p o u n d s p e r sq u a r e i n c h ( p s i ) s h a l l b e r e d u c e d t o 8 0 p s i o r l e s s b y m e a n s o f p r e s s u r e r e d u c i n g va l v e s i n s t a l l e d a t t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s s e r v i c e . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 5 - 4 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a l a n d s c a p e a n d i r r i g a t i o n p l a n w h i c h s h a l l b e p r e p a r e d a n d c e r t i f i e d b y a l i c e n s e d la n d s c a p e a r c h i t e c t . T h e i r r i g a t i o n p l a n s h a l l s p e c i f y m e t h o d s f o r m o n i t o r i n g t h e ir r i g a t i o n s y s t e m . T h e s y s t e m s h a l l e n s u r e t h a t i r r i g a t i o n r a t e s d o n o t e x c e e d t h e in f i l t r a t i o n o f l o c a l s o i l s , t h a t t h e a p p l i c a t i o n o f f e r t i l i z e r s a n d p e s t i c i d e s d o n o t e x c e e d ap p r o p r i a t e l e v e l s o f f r e q u e n c i e s , a n d t h a t s u r f ac e r u n o f f a n d o v e r w a t e r i n g i s m i n i m i z e d . Th e l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n p l a n s s h a l l i n c l u d e w a t e r - c o n s e r v i n g f e a t u r e s s u c h a s lo w f l o w i r r i g a t i o n h e a d s , a u t o m a t i c i r r i g a t i o n s c h e d u l i n g e q u i p m e n t , f l o w s e n s i n g Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 1 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion co n t r o l s , r a i n s e n s o r s , s o i l m o i s t u r e s en s o r s , a n d o t h e r w a t e r - c o n s e r v i n g e q u i p m e n t . Th e l a n d s c a p i n g a n d i r r i g a t i o n p l a n s s h a l l i nd i c a t e t h a t s e p a r a t e i r r i g a t i o n l i n e s f o r re c y c l e d w a t e r s h a l l b e c o n s t r u c t e d a n d r e c y c l e d w a t e r w i l l b e u s e d w h e n i t b e c o m e s av a i l a b l e . A l l i r r i g a t i o n s y s t e m s s h a l l b e d e s i g ne d s o t h a t t h e y w i l l f u n c t i o n p r o p e r l y w i t h re c y c l e d w a t e r . 5. 1 5 - 5 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f t h e F i n a l Si t e P l a n a n d b u i l d i n g pe r m i t s Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f t h e F i n a l S i t e P l a n a n d b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , p l a n s s h a l l s p e c i f i c a l l y s h o w th a t t h e w a t e r m e t e r a n d b a c k f l o w e q u i p m en t a n d a n y o t h e r l a r g e w a t e r s y s t e m eq u i p m e n t w i l l b e i n s t a l l e d t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i on o f t h e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t , W a t e r En g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n , a b o v e g r o u n d a n d b e h i nd t h e b u i l d i n g s e t b a c k l i n e i n a m a n n e r fu l l y s c r e e n e d f r o m a l l p u b l i c s t r e e t s a n d a ll e y s a n d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h O r d i n a n c e N o . 41 5 6 . P r i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s , t h e w a t e r m e t e r a n d b a c k f l o w eq u i p m e n t a n d a n y o t h e r l a r g e w a t e r s y s t em e q u i p m e n t s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d t o t h e sa t i s f a c t i o n o f t h e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r tm e n t , W a t e r E n g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n , i n ac c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e F i n a l S i t e P l a n a n d t h e b u i l d i n g p e r m i t p l a n s . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 5 - 6 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t , u n l e s s re c o r d s i n d i c a t e p r e v i o u s pa y m e n t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , u n l e s s r e c o r d s i n d i c a t e p r e v i o u s p a y m e n t , t h e ap p r o p r i a t e f e e s f o r P r i m a r y M a i n s , S e c o n d a r y M a i n s a n d F i r e P r o t e c t i o n S e r v i c e s h a l l be p a i d t o t h e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t, W a t e r E n g i n e e r i n g D i v i s i o n i n a c c o r d a n c e wit h R u l e 1 5 A , a n d R u l e 2 0 o f t h e P u b l i c Ut i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t W a t e r R a t e s , R u l e s a n d Re g u l a t i o n s . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 5 - 7 P r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s Pr i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n s , a s e p a r a t e w a t e r m e t e r s h a l l b e i n s t a l l e d fo r l a n d s c a p e w a t e r o n a l l p r o j e c t s w h e r e t h e l a n d s c a p e a r e a e x c e e d s 2 , 5 0 0 s q u a r e fe e t i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 3 4 9 . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 5 - 8 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e fi r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r gr a d i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r oc c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t o r g r a d i n g p e r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l c o m p l y wi t h R u l e 1 5 E o f t h e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t W a t e r R a t e s , R u l e s , a n d R e g u l a t i o n s . R u l e 1 5 E s h a l l b e a m e n d e d t o in c l u d e : a. C o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n e w w e l l w i t h a m i n i m u m 1 , 5 0 0 G P M c a p a c i t y t o s e r v e T h e An a h e i m R e s o r t A r e a ( t e n t a t i v e l o c a t i on n e a r P o n d e r o s a P a r k a n d O r a n g e w o o d Av e n u e ) ; a n d b. C o n s t r u c t i o n o f a n e w 1 6 - i n c h w a t e r m a i n a l o n g H a r b o r B o u l e v a r d f r o m Or a n g e w o o d t o C h a p m a n A v e n u e . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 5 - 9 O n g o i n g O n g o i n g , t he C i t y s h a l l c o n t i n u e t o c o l l a b o r a t e w i th t h e M e t r o p o l i t a n W a t e r D i s t r i c t o f So u t h e r n C a l i f o r n i a ( M W D ) , i t s m e m b e r a g e n c ie s , a n d t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y W a t e r D i s t r i c t (O C W D ) t o e n s u r e t h a t a v a i l a b l e w a t e r su p p l i e s m e e t a n t i c i p a t e d d e m a n d . I f i t i s fo r e c a s t e d t h a t w a t e r d e m a n d e x c e e d s a v a i l a b l e s u p p l i e s , s t a f f s h a l l r e c o m m e n d t o C i t y Co u n c i l t o t r i g g e r a p p l i c a t i o n o f t h e W a t e r C o n s e r v a t i o n O r d i n a n c e ( A n a h e i m M u n i c i p a l Co d e , § 1 0 . 1 8 ) , a s p r e s c r i b e d , t o r e q u i r e m a n d a t o r y c o n s e r v a t i o n m e a s u r e s a s au t h o r i z e d b y th e O r d i n a n c e Se c t i o n s 1 0 . 1 8 . 0 7 0 t h r o u g h 1 0 . 18 . 0 9 0 , a s a p p r o p r i a t e . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 2 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion SE W E R 5. 1 6 - 1 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l su b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e of a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g pe r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / de v e l o p e r s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e C i t y ’ s Ma s t e r P l a n o f S e w e r s a n d r e l a t e d I n f r a s t r u c tu r e I m p r o v e m e n t ( F e e ) P r o g r a m t o a s s i s t in m i t i g a t i n g e x i s t i n g a n d f u t u re s a n i t a r y s e w e r s y s t e m d e f i c i e n c i e s a s f o l l o w s : Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a r ep o r t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l o f t h e C i t y En g i n e e r t o a s s i s t i n d e t e r m i n i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g : a. I f t h e d e v e l o p m e n t / r e d e v e l o p m e n t ( 1 ) do e s n o t d i s c h a r g e i n t o a s e w e r s y s t e m th a t i s c u r r e n t l y d e f i c i e n t o r w i l l b e c o m e d e f i c i e n t b e c a u s e o f t h a t d i s c h a r g e an d / o r ( 2 ) d o e s n o t i n c r e a s e f l o w s o r ch a n g e p o i n t s o f d i s c h a r g e , t h e n t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r ’ s / d e v e l o p e r ’ s r e s p o n s i b i l i t y s h a l l b e l i m i t e d t o p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n t h e In f r a s t r u c t u r e I m p r o v e m e n t ( F e e ) P r o g r a m . b. I f t h e d e v e l o p m e n t / r e d e v e l o p m e n t ( 1 ) d i sc h a r g e s i n t o a s e w e r s y s t e m t h a t i s cu r r e n t l y d e f i c i e n t o r w i l l b e c o m e d e f i c i e nt b e c a u s e o f t h a t di s c h a r g e a n d / o r ( 2 ) in c r e a s e s f l o w s o r c h a n g e s p o i n t s o f d i s c h a r g e , t h e n t h e p r o p e r t y ow n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d t o g u a r a n te e m i t i g a t i o n t o t h e s a t i s f a c t i o n o f th e C i t y E n g i n e e r a n d t h e C i t y A t t o r n e y o f t h e i m p a c t p r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l su b d i v i s i o n m a p o r i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s fi r s t , p u r s u a n t t o t h e i m p r o v e m e n t s i d e n t i f ie d i n t h e S o u t h C e n t r a l A r e a S e w e r De f i c i e n c y S t u d y . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e r e q u i r e d t o i n s t a l l t h e sa n i t a r y s e w e r f a c i l i t i e s , a s r e c o m m e n d e d b y t h e S o u t h C e n t r a l A r e a S e w e r De f i c i e n c y S t u d y , p r i o r t o a c c e p t a n c e f o r m a i n t e n a n c e o f p u b l i c i m p r o v e m e n t s by t h e C i t y o r f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i ng i n s p e c t i o n s f o r t h e b u i l d i n g / s t r u c t u r e , wh i c h e v e r c o m e s f i r s t . A d d i t i o n a l l y , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l pa r t i c i p a t e i n t h e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e I m p r o v em e n t ( F e e ) P r o g r a m , a s d e t e r m i n e d b y th e C i t y E n g i n e e r , w h i c h m a y i n c l u d e fe e s , c r e d i t s , r e i m b u r s e m e n t s , o r a co m b i n a t i o n t h e r e o f . A s p a r t o f g u a r a n t e e i ng t h e m i t i g a t i o n o f i m p a c t s f o r t h e sa n i t a r y s e w e r s y s t e m , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r/ d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a s a n i t a r y se w e r s y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g p l a n f o r t h e p r o j e c t t o t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r f o r re v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l w h i c h s h a l l c o n t a i n , a t a m i n i m u m , ( 1 ) a l a y o u t o f t h e co m p l e t e s y s t e m , ( 2 ) a l l f a c i l i t y s i z e s , i n c l u d i n g s u p p o r t c a l c u l a t i o n s , ( 3 ) co n s t r u c t i o n p h a s i n g , a n d ( 4 ) c o n s t r u c t i o n e s t i m a t e s . Th e s t u d y s h a l l d e t e r m i n e t h e i m p a c t o f t h e pr o j e c t s e w e r f l o w s f o r t o t a l b u i l d o u t of t h e p r o j e c t a n d i d e n t i f y l o c a l d e f i c i e n c ie s f o r e a c h p r o j e c t c o m p o n e n t ( i . e . , ea c h h o t e l ) . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t MM 3 . 1 0 . 7 - 5 (E I R 3 1 1 , M M P No . 6 7 ) Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f t h e f i r s t b u i l d i n g p e r m i t f o r d e v e l o p m e n t o f a f a c i l i t y o t h e r t h a n pa r k i n g i n t h e F u t u r e E x p a n s i o n D i s t r i c t , t h e a p p l i c a n t s h a l l e n t e r i n t o a n a g r e e m e n t w i t h th e C i t y o f A n a h e i m t o p a y o r c a u s e t o b e p a i d it s f a i r s h a r e o f f u n d i n g f o r t h e f o l l o w i n g im p r o v e m e n t s : Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 3 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion  T h e a p p l i c a b l e s e g m e n t s o f a C i t y s e w e r r e p l a c e m e n t o r p a r a l l e l l i n e t o a n ex i s t i n g 1 8 - i n c h C i t y s e w e r l i n e i n O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e f r o m t h e e x i s t i n g 2 4 - i n c h Di s t r i c t t r u n k s e w e r l i n e a t N i n t h S t r e e t t o a p o i n t o f w e s t o f I - 5 . T h i s w i l l b e ne c e s s a r y f o r c o n s t r u c t i o n o f t h e F u t u re E x p a n s i o n D i s t r i c t o r a n y o t h e r de v e l o p m e n t s i n t h e C o m m e r c i a l R e c r e a t i o n A r e a s o u t h o f K a t e l l a a n d W e s t o f I- 5 . T h i s m i t i g a t i o n w i l l b e r e a d d r e s s e d in s u b s e q u e n t e n v i r o n m e n t a l r e v i e w f o r th e F u t u r e E x p a n s i o n D i s t r i c t .  A C i t y s e w e r m a i n r e p l a c e m e n t o r p a r a l l e l l i n e i n H a r b o r B o u l e v a r d f r o m Co n v e n t i o n W a y t o O r a n g e w o o d A v e n u e . Th e C i t y r e c o g n i z e s t h a t t h e s e i m p r o v e m e n t s w i l l s e r v e n o t o n l y t h e a p p l i c a n t b u t a l s o ot h e r p r o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s i n t h e S p ec i f i c P l a n a r e a , t h e A n a h e i m R e s o r t , a n d th e s e r v i c e a r e a , e a c h o f w h i c h sh o u l d c o n t r i b u t e i t s a l l o c a b l e sh a r e o f t h e c o s t o f t h e s e im p r o v e m e n t s . T o i m p l e m e n t t h i s r e q u i r em e n t a s i t a p p l i e s t o o t h e r p r o p e r t y ow n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s i n t h e S p e c i f i c P l a n a r e a , t h e A n a h e i m R e s o r t , a n d t h e s e r v i c e a r e a , th e C i t y s h a l l , a n d s h a l l m a k e a p p r o p r i a t e a r r a ng e m e n t s w i t h o t h e r p u b l i c a g e n c i e s , i f an y , t o r e i m b u r s e t h e a p p l i c a n t t o t h e ex t e n t t h a t i t s c o n t r i b u t i o n s f o r t h e s e im p r o v e m e n t s e x c e e d t h e a p p l i c a n t ' s a l l o c a bl e s h a r e o f t h e c o s t . S u c h a r r a n g e m e n t s sh a l l i n c l u d e o n e o r m o r e o f t h e f o l l o w i n g : ( 1 ) c r e a t i o n o f i n t e g r a t e d f i n a n c i n g d i s t r i c t s ; (2 ) e n t r y i n t o a r e i m b u r s e m e n t a g r e e m e n t w i th t h e a p p l i c a n t ; ( 3 ) c r e a t i o n o f a p p r o p r i a t e co m m u n i t y f a c i l i t i e s d i s t r i c t s , a s s e s s m e n t d i s t ri c t s , a n d / o r u s e o f s i m i l a r p u b l i c f i n a n c i n g di s t r i c t s a n d / o r m e c h a n i s m s ; a n d ( 4 ) c r e a t i o n of o t h e r s u c h m e c h a n i s m s o r d i s t r i c t s a s ma y b e a p p r o p r i a t e t o p r o v i d e f o r t h e r e i m b u rs e m e n t o f t h e s e c o s t s. T h e d e t e r m i n a t i o n of t h e a l l o c a b l e s h a r e o f im p r o v e m e n t c o s t s a t t r i b u t a b l e t o t h e a p p l i c a n t a n d o t h e r pr o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s , a n d r e i m b u r s e me n t a m o u n t s , s h a l l b e b a s e d o n a n ap p o r t i o n m e n t o f t h e c o s t s o f s u c h i m p r o v e m e n t s a m o n g p r o p e r t y o w n e r s / d e v e l o p e r s , in c l u d i n g t h e a p p l i c a n t , i n t h e S p e c i f i c P l a n a r e a , t h e A n a h e i m R e s o r t , o r o t h e r w i s e de f i n e d s e r v i c e a r e a , a s a p p l i c a b l e, d e p e n d i n g o n t h e a r e a s e r v e d . To i m p l e m e n t t h i s m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e , th e C i t y h a s a d o p t e d t h e S e w e r I m p a c t a n d Im p r o v e m e n t F e e P r o g r a m f o r t h e S o u t h C e n t ra l C i t y A r e a . C o m p l i a n c e w i t h t h i s F e e Pr o g r a m b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r (p e r O r d i n a n c e N o . 5 4 9 0 a n d R e s o l u t i o n N o . 95 R - 6 0 d a t e d A p r i l 1 8 , 1 9 9 5 ) s h a l l s a t i s f y t h e re q u i r e m e n t s o f t h i s M i t i g a t i o n M e a s u r e , or t h e C i t y m a y e n t e r i n t o a l t e r n a t i v e f i n a n c i n g a r r a n g e m e n t s w i t h t h e a p p l i c a n t . EL E C T R I C I T Y 5. 1 7 - 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t he p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p s h a l l c o n s u l t w i t h th e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e pa r t m e n t , B u s i n e s s a n d C o m m u n i t y P r o g r a m s Di v i s i o n i n o r d e r t o r e v i e w e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t m e a s u r e s t o i n c o r p o r a t e i n t o t h e p r o j e c t de s i g n . P r i o r t o t h e f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g in s p e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r d e v e l o p e r sh a l l i m p l e m e n t t h e s e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t m e a s u r e s w h i c h m a y i n c l u d e t h e f o l l o w i n g : A. Hi g h - e f f i c i e n c y a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g s y s t e m s w i t h E M S ( c o m p u t e r ) c o n t r o l Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 4 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion B. Va r i a b l e a i r v o l u m e ( V A V ) d i s t r i b u t i o n C. Ou t s i d e a i r ( 1 0 0 % ) e c o n o m i z e r c y c l e D. St a g e d c o m p r e s s o r s o r v a r i a b l e s p e e d d r i v e s t o f l o w v a r y i n g t h e r m a l l o a d s E. Is o l a t e d H V A C z o n e c o n t r o l b y f l o o r s / s e p a r a b l e a c t i v i t y a r e a s F. Sp e c i f i c a t i o n o f p r e m i u m - e f f i c i e n c y e l e c t r ic m o t o r s ( i . e . , c o m p r e s s o r m o t o r s , a i r - ha n d l i n g u n i t s , a n d f a n - c o i l u n i t s ) G. Us e o f o c c u p a n c y s e n s o r s i n a p p r o p r i a t e s p a c e s H. Us e o f c o m p a c t f l u o r e s c e n t l a m p s I. Us e o f c o l d c a t h o d e f l u o r e s c e n t l a m p s J. Us e o f l i g h t e m i t t i n g d i o d e ( L E D ) o r e q u i v a l e n t e n e r g y - e f f i c i e n t l i g h t i n g f o r ou t d o o r l i g h t i n g K. Us e o f E n e r g y S t a r ® e x i t li g h t i n g o r e x i t s i g n a g e . L. Us e o f T - 8 l a m p s a n d e l e c t r o n i c b a l l a s ts w h e r e a p p l i c a t i o n s o f s t a n d a r d fl u o r e s c e n t f i x t u r e s a r e i d e n t i f i e d M. Us e o f l i g h t i n g p o w e r c o n t r o l l e r s i n a s so c i a t i o n w i t h m e t a l - h a l i d e o r h i g h - pr e s s u r e s o d i u m ( h i g h i n t e n s i t y d i s c h a r g e ) l a m p s f o r o u t d o o r l i g h t i n g a n d pa r k i n g l o t s N. Co n s i d e r a t i o n o f t h e r m a l e n e r g y s t o r a g e a i r- c o n d i t i o n i n g f o r s p a c e s o r f a c i l i t i e s th a t m a y r e q u i r e a i r - c o n d i t i o n i n g d u r i n g s u m m e r , d a y - p e a k p e r i o d s . O. Fo r s w i m m i n g p o o l s a n d s p a s , i n c o r p o r a t e so l a r h e a t i n g , a u t o m a t i c c o v e r s , a n d ef f i c i e n t p u m p s a n d m o t o r s , a s f e a s i b l e . P. Co n s i d e r a t i o n f o r p a r t i c i p a t i o n i n A d v an t a g e S e r v i c e s P r o g r a m s s u c h a s : a. N e w c o n s t r u c t i o n d e s i g n r e v i e w , i n w h i c h t h e C i t y c o s t - s h a r e s e n g i n e e r i n g fo r u p t o $ 1 0 , 0 0 0 f o r d e s i g n o f e n e r g y e f f i c i e n t b u i l d i n g s a n d s y s t e m s b. N e w C o n s t r u c t i o n – c a s h i n c e n t i v e s ( $ 3 0 0 t o $ 4 0 0 p e r k W r e d u c t i o n i n l o a d ) fo r e f f i c i e n c y t h a t e x c e e d s w a r e q u i r e m e n t s c. G r e e n B u i l d i n g P r o g r a m – o f f e r s a c c e l e r a t e d p l a n a p p r o v a l , f i n a n c i a l in c e n t i v e s , w a i v e d p l a n c h e c k f e e s a n d f r e e t e c h n i c a l a s s i s t a n c e . Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 5 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion 5. 1 7 - 2 P r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g i n s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i n s t a l l an u n d e r g r o u n d e l e c t r i c a l s e r v i c e f r o m t he P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D i s t r i b u t i o n S y s t e m . T h e Un d e r g r o u n d S e r v i c e w i l l b e i n s t a l l e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e E l e c t r i c R u l e s , R a t e s , Re g u l a t i o n s a n d E l e c t r i c a l S p e c i f i c a t i o n s f o r U n d e r g r o u n d S y s t e m s . E l e c t r i c a l S e r v i c e Fe e s a n d o t h e r a p p l i c a b l e f e e s w i l l b e a s s e s s e d in a c c o r d a n c e w i t h t h e E l e c t r i c R u l e s , Ra t e s , R e g u l a t i o n s a n d E l e c t r i c a l S p e c if i c a t i o n s f o r U n d e r g r o u n d S y s t e m s . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 7 - 3 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t pl a n s a n d c a l c u l a t i o n s t o t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m P l a n n i n g D e p a r t m e n t , B u i l d i n g D i v i s i o n , to d e m o n s t r a t e t h a t t h e e n e r g y e f f i c i e n c y o f e a c h b u i l d i n g w i l l e x c e e d t h e T i t l e 2 4 E n e r g y Ef f i c i e n c y S t a n d a r d s f o r R e s i d e n t i a l a n d N o n r e s id e n t i a l B u i l d i n g s c u r r e n t a t t h e t i m e o f ap p l i c a t i o n b y a t l e a s t 1 0 p e r c e n t . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 7 - 4 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a F i n a l Si t e P l a n Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a F i n a l S i t e P l a n , t h e pr o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l c o o r d i n a t e w i t h th e P u b l i c U t i l i t i e s D e p a r t m e n t t o i n c o r p o r at e f e a s i b l e r e n e w a b l e e n e r g y g e n e r a t i o n me a s u r e s i n t o t h e p r o j e c t . T h e s e m e a s u r e s ma y i n c l u d e b u t n o t b e l i m i t e d t o u s e o f so l a r a n d s m a l l w i n d t u r b i n e s o u r c e s o n n e w an d e x i s t i n g f a c i l i t i e s a n d t h e u s e o f s o l a r po w e r e d l i g h t i n g i n p a r k i n g a r e a s . Pu b l i c U t i l i t i e s De p a r t m e n t ST O R M W A T E R 5. 1 8 - 1 P r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l su b d i v i s i o n m a p , o r i s s u a n c e of a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g pe r m i t , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t Pr i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p , or i s s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / de v e l o p e r s h a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e C i t y ’ s Ma s t e r P l a n o f S t o r m D r a i n s a n d r e l a t e d I n fr a s t r u c t u r e I m p r o v e m e n t ( F e e ) P r o g r a m t o as s i s t i n m i t i g a t i n g e x i s t i n g an d f u t u r e s t o r m d r a i n a g e s y s t e m d e f i c i e n c i e s a s f o l l o w s : Th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t a re p o r t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l b y t h e C i t y En g i n e e r t o a s s i s t w i t h d e t e r m i n i n g t h e f o l l o w i n g : a. I f t h e s p e c i f i c d e v e l o p m e n t/ r e d e v e l o p m e n t d o e s n o t i n c r ea s e o r r e d i r e c t c u r r e n t or h i s t o r i c s t o r m w a t e r q u a n t i t i e s / f l o w s, t h e n t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r ’ s re s p o n s i b i l i t y s h a l l b e l i m i t e d t o p a r t i c i p a ti o n i n t h e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e I m p r o v e m e n t (F e e ) P r o g r a m t o p r o v i d e s t o r m d r a i n a g e f a c i l i t i e s i n 1 0 - a n d 2 5 - y e a r s t o r m fr e q u e n c i e s a n d t o p r o t e c t p r o p e r t i e s / s t r uc t u r e s f o r a 1 0 0 - y e a r s t o r m f r e q u e n c y . b. I f t h e s p e c i f i c d e v e l o p m e n t / r e d e v e l o p m e n t in c r e a s e s o r r e d i r e c t s t h e c u r r e n t o r hi s t o r i c s t o r m w a t e r q u a n t i t y / f l o w , t h e n t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l b e re q u i r e d t o g u a r a n t e e m i t i g a t i o n t o t h e s a ti s f a c t i o n o f t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r a n d C i t y At t o r n e y ’ s o f f i c e o f t h e i m p a c t p r i o r t o a p p r o v a l o f a f i n a l s u b d i v i s i o n m a p o r is s u a n c e o f a g r a d i n g o r b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , wh i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t , p u r s u a n t t o t h e im p r o v e m e n t s i d e n t i f i e d i n t h e M a s t e r Pl a n o f D r a i n a g e f o r t h e S o u t h C e n t r a l Ar e a . T h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h al l b e r e q u i r e d t o i n s t a l l t h e s t o r m dr a i n a g e f a c i l i t i e s a s r e c o m m e n d e d b y t h e Ma s t e r P l a n o f D r a i n a g e f o r t h e S o u t h Ce n t r a l A r e a t o p r o v i d e s t o r m d r a i n a g e f a c i l i t i e s f o r 1 0 - a n d 2 5 - y e a r s t o r m fr e q u e n c i e s a n d t o p r o t e c t p r o p e r t i e s / s t r uc t u r e s f o r a 1 0 0 - y e a r s t o r m f r e q u e n c y pr i o r t o a c c e p t a n c e f o r m a i n t e n a n c e o f p u bl i c i m p r o v e m e n t s b y t h e C i t y o r f i n a l bu i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c t i o n f o r t h e b u i l d in g / s t r u c t u r e , w h i c h e v e r o c c u r s f i r s t . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 6 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion Ad d i t i o n a l l y , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r sh a l l p a r t i c i p a t e i n t h e I n f r a s t r u c t u r e Im p r o v e m e n t ( F e e ) P r o g r a m a s d e t e r m i n ed b y t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r w h i c h c o u l d in c l u d e f e e s , c r e d i t s , r e i m b u r s e m e n t s , o r a c o m b i n a t i o n t h e r e o f . A s p a r t o f gu a r a n t e e i n g t h e m i t i g a t i o n o f i m p a c t s on t h e s t o r m d r a i n a g e s y s t e m , a s t o r m dr a i n a g e s y s t e m i m p r o v e m e n t p h a s i n g p l a n fo r t h e p r o j e c t s h a l l b e s u b m i t t e d b y th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r t o t h e C i t y E n g i n e e r f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l a n d sh a l l c o n t a i n , a t a m i n i m u m , ( 1 ) a l a y o u t o f t h e c o m p l e t e s y s t e m ; ( 2 ) a l l f a c i l i t y si z e s , i n c l u d i n g s u p p o r t c a l c u l a t i o ns ; ( 3 ) c o n s t r u c t i o n p h a s i n g ; a n d , (4 ) c o n s t r u c t i o n e s t i m a t e s . 5. 1 8 - 2 O n g o i n g O n g o i n g , t h e C i t y s h a l l w o r k w i t h t h e O r a n g e C o u n t y F l o o d C o n t r o l D i s t r i c t ( O C F C D ) t o en s u r e t h a t f l o o d c o n t r o l f a c i l i t i e s a r e w e l l m a i n t a i n e d a n d c a p a b l e o f a c c o m m o d a t i n g , at a m i n i m u m , f u t u r e 2 5 - y e a r s t o r m f l o w s f o r C i t y - o w n e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d f a c i l i t i e s , a n d 10 0 - y e a r s t o r m f l o w s f o r C o u n t y f a c i l i t i e s . W h e r e i m p r o v e m e n t s t o l o c a l d r a i n a g e fa c i l i t i e s h a v e t h e p o t e n t i a l t o i n c r e a s e d i s c h a r g e s t o C o u n t y f a c i l i t i e s , t h e C i t y s h a l l an a l y z e p o t e n t i a l i m p a c t s t o C o u n t y f a c i l i t i e s i n c o n s u l t a t i o n w i t h t h e M a n a g e r , C o u n t y of O r a n g e F l o o d C o n t r o l D i v i s i o n . E n c r o a c h m en t P e r m i t s s h a l l b e o b t a i n e d f r o m t h e Co u n t y ’ s P u b l i c P r o p e r t y P e r m i t s S e c t i o n f o r a n y a c t i v i t y p e r f o r m e d w i t h i n O C F C D ’ s ri g h t o f w a y . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 8 - 3 P r i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f bu i l d i n g p e r m i t s Pr i o r t o t h e i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , th e C i t y s h a l l r e q u i r e t h a t b u i l d i n g p l a n s in d i c a t e t h a t n e w d e v e l o p m e n t s w i l l m i n i m i z e s t o r m w a t e r a n d u r b a n r u n o f f i n t o d r a i n a g e fa c i l i t i e s b y i n c o r p o r a t i n g de s i g n f e a t u r e s s u c h a s d e t en t i o n b a s i n s , o n - s i t e w a t e r fe a t u r e s , a n d o t h e r s t r a t e g i e s . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t OT H E R P U B L I C U T I L I T I E S 5. 1 9 - 1 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t ; t o b e im p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o f i n a l bu i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g In s p e c t i o n Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t ; t o b e i m p l e m e n t e d p r i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d zo n i n g I n s p e c t i o n , t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l s u b m i t p r o j e c t p l a n s t o t h e P u b l i c Wo r k s D e p a r t m e n t f o r r e v i e w a n d a p p r o v a l t o e n s u r e t h a t t h e p l a n s c o m p l y w i t h A B 93 9 , t h e S o l i d W a s t e R e d u c t i o n A c t o f 1 9 8 9 , as a d m i n i s t e r e d b y t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m an d t h e C o u n t y o f O r a n g e a n d C i t y o f A n a h e im I n t e g r a t e d W a s t e M a n a g e m e n t P l a n s . Pr i o r t o f i n a l b u i l d i n g a n d z o n i n g i n s p e c ti o n , i m p l e m e n t a t i o n o f s a i d p l a n s h a l l co m m e n c e a n d s h a l l r e m a i n i n f u l l e f f e c t . Wa s t e m a n a g e m e n t m i t i g a t i o n m e a s u r e s t h a t sh a l l b e t a k e n t o r e d u c e s o l i d w a s t e g e n e r at i o n i n c l u d e , b u t a r e n o t l i m i t e d t o : a. D e t a i l i n g t h e l o c a t i o n a n d d e s i g n o f o n - s i t e r e c y c l i n g f a c i l i t i e s . b. P r o v i d i n g o n - s i t e r e c y c l i n g r e c e p t a c l e s t o e n c o u r a g e r e c y c l i n g . c. C o m p l y i n g w i t h a l l F e d e r a l , S t a t e an d C i t y r e g u l a t i o n f o r h a z a r d o u s m a t e r i a l di s p o s a l . d. P a r t i c i p a t i n g i n t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m ’ s “ R e c y c l e A n a h e i m ” p r o g r a m o r o t h e r su b s t i t u t e p r o g r a m a s m a y b e d e v e l o p e d b y t h e C i t y . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Ad d e n d u m t o E I R 3 1 1 a n d E I R 3 4 0 R:\ P r o j e c t s \ A N A \ 3 A N A 0 0 9 1 0 5 \ A d d e n d u m \ S t a r w o o d E l e m e n t H o t e l A d d e n d u m - 1 2 2 3 1 6 . d o c x 7 - 2 7 Updated and Modified Mi t i g a t i o n M o n i t o r i n g P l a n N o . 3 4 0 Mi t i g a t i o n Me a s u r e N u m b e r Ti m i n g Me a s u r e Responsible for Monitoring Completion In o r d e r t o m e e t t h e r e q u i r e m e n t s o f t h e So l i d W a s t e R e d u c t i o n A c t o f 1 9 8 9 ( A B 9 3 9 ) , th e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r s h a l l i m p l em e n t n u m e r o u s s o l i d w a s t e r e d u c t i o n pr o g r a m s , a s r e q u i r e d b y t h e P u b l i c W o r ks D e p a r t m e n t , i n c l u d i n g , b u t n o t l i m i t e d t o : a. F a c i l i t a t i n g r e c y c l i n g b y p r o v i d i n g c h u t es o r c o n v e n i e n t l o c a t i o n s f o r s o r t i n g a n d re c y c l i n g b i n s . b. F a c i l i t a t i n g c a r d b o a r d r e c y c l i n g ( e s p e c i a ll y i n r e t a i l a r e a s ) b y p r o v i d i n g a d e q u a t e sp a c e a n d c e n t r a l i z e d l o c a t i o n s f o r c o l l e c t i o n a n d s t o r i n g . c. F a c i l i t a t i n g g l a s s r e c y c l i n g ( e s p e c i a l l y f r o m r e s t a u r a n t s ) b y p r o v i d i n g a d e q u a t e sp a c e f o r s o r t i n g a n d s t o r i n g . d. P r o v i d i n g t r a s h c o m p a c t o r s f o r n o n - r e c y c l a b l e m a t e r i a l s w h e n e v e r f e a s i b l e to r e d u c e t h e t o t a l v o l u m e o f s o l i d w a s t e a n d t h e n u m b e r o f t r i p s r e q u i r e d fo r c o l l e c t i o n . e. P r o h i b i t i n g c u r b s i d e p i c k - u p . 5. 1 9 - 2 O n g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t op e r a t i o n On g o i n g d u r i n g p r o j e c t o p e r a t i on , t h e f o l l o w i n g p r a c t i c e s sh a l l b e i m p l e m e n t e d , a s fe a s i b l e , b y t h e p r o p e r t y o w n e r / d e v e l o p e r : a. U s a g e o f r e c y c l e d p a p e r p r o d u c t s f o r s t a t i o n a r y , l e t t e r h e a d , a n d p a c k a g i n g . b. R e c o v e r y o f m a t e r i a l s s u c h a s a l u m i n u m a n d c a r d b o a r d . c. C o l l e c t i o n o f o f f i c e p a p e r f o r r e c y c l i n g . d. C o l l e c t i o n o f p o l y s t y r e n e ( f o a m ) c u p s f o r r e c y c l i n g . e. C o l l e c t i o n o f g l a s s , p l a s t i c s , k i t c h e n gr e a s e , l a s e r p r i n t e r t o n e r c a r t r i d g e s , o i l , ba t t e r i e s , a n d s c r a p m e t a l f o r r e c y c l i n g o r r e c o v e r y . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 9 - 3 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g pe r m i t s Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f b u i l d i n g p e r m i t s , p l a n s sh a l l s h o w t h a t t r a s h s t o r a g e a r e a s s h a l l b e pr o v i d e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d i n a l o c a t i o n a c c e p t a b l e t o t h e C i t y o f A n a h e i m D e p a r t m e n t o f Pu b l i c W o r k s , O p e r a t i o n s D i v is i o n . O n a n o n g o i n g b a s i s , t r a s h s t o r a g e a r e a s s h a l l b e pr o v i d e d a n d m a i n t a i n e d i n a c c o r d a n c e w i t h a p p r o v e d p l a n s o n f i l e w i t h s a i d De p a r t m e n t . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 9 - 4 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h bu i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h b u i l d i n g p e r m i t , t h e P r o p e r t y O w n e r / D e v e l o p e r s h a l l de m o n s t r a t e t h a t t h e p l a n s i n c l u d e p r o v i s i o ns f o r t h e i n s t a l l a t i o n o f t r a s h a n d r e c y c l e re c e p t a c l e s n e a r a l l b e n c h e s a n d n e a r h i g h t r a ff i c a r e a s s u c h a s p l a z a s , t r a n s i t s t o p s an d r e t a i l a n d d i n i n g e s t a b l i s h m e n t s . Pu b l i c W o r k s De p a r t m e n t 5. 1 9 - 5 P r i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h gr a d i n g a n d b u i l d i n g p e r m i t Pr i o r t o i s s u a n c e o f e a c h g r a d i n g a n d b u il d i n g p e r m i t , t h e P r o p e r t y O w n e r / D e v e l o p e r sh a l l s u b m i t t o t h e P l a n n i n g D i r e c t o r o r P l a n n i n g S e r v i c e s M a n a g e r f o r a p p r o v a l a Co n s t r u c t i o n W a s t e M a n a g e m e n t P l a n t h a t , a t a m i n i m u m , s p e c i f i e s t h a t a t l e a s t 7 5 pe r c e n t o f n o n - h a z a r d o u s c o n s t r u c t i o n a n d d e m o l i t i o n d e b r i s s h a l l b e r e c y c l e d o r sa l v a g e d a n d i d e n t i f i e s t h e m a t e r i a l s t o b e d i v e r t e d f r o m d i s p o s a l a n d w h e t h e r t h e ma t e r i a l s w i l l b e s o r t e d o n s i t e o r c o - m i n g l e d . Pl a n n i n g a n d B u i l d i n g De p a r t m e n t Starwood Element Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 7-28 Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 340 This page intentionally left blank Starwood Element Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 8-1 References SECTION 8.0 REFERENCES AT&T. 2016. About AT&T. http://about.att.com/category/all_news.html. Dallas, TX: AT&T. Anaheim, City of. 2016 (November 2). Personal communication. Letter from C. Nguyen (City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division) to Elaine Thienprasiddhi (City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division) entitled “Review of Historic Status for 200 West Alro Way”. ———. 2015 (July). Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan: Sustainable Electric and Water Initiatives. Anaheim, CA: the City. ———.2013 (November 5, current through). Anaheim, California Code of Ordinances. Cincinnati, OH: American Legal Publishing for the City. http://www.amlegal.com/ anaheim_ca/. https://www.anaheim.net/generalplan/. ———. 2012 (September 14). Draft Environmental Impact Report 340 Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (prepared by BonTerra Consulting). Anaheim, CA: the City. ———. 2004a (May). General Plan for the City of Anaheim (City Council Resolution No. 2004- 94). Anaheim, CA: the City. ———. 2004b (May). Final Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update Environmental Impact No. 330 (SCH #2003041105). Anaheim, CA: the City. ———. 1994a (August). The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Draft EIR No. 313 with Addendum. Anaheim, CA: the City. ———. 1994b (September). The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2. Anaheim, CA: the City. Anaheim Resort Transit (ART). 2016. Anaheim Transportation Network. Anaheim, CA: ART. http://rideart.org/routes-and-schedules/hotel-circle-clementine-line/. ARCADIS U.S., Inc. 2011 (July 21). Consideration of the City of Anaheim’s Resort Specific Plan on Current and Projected Water Demands. Irvine, CA: ARCADIS. Arnau, J. 2016 (October 10). Personal communication. Email between J. Arnau (OC Waste & Recycling) and M. Larum (BonTerra Psomas) entitled “Starwood Element Hotel Project”. California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2014 (November 7, last reviewed). Board Meetings. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/board/meetings.htm#future. ———. 2013. The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality, 2013 Edition. Sacramento, CA: CARB. https://www.arb.ca.gov/aqd/almanac/almanac13/almanac 2013all.pdf. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2016 (July 27, last update). Eligible (E) and Officially Designated (OD) Routes. Sacramento, CA: CalTrans. http://www.dot.ca.gov/design/lap/livability/scenic-highways/index.html. ———. 2009 (August). Combined Central Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers – Amendment to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Los Angeles, CA: CH2M Hill. Starwood Element Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 8-2 References Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP). 2014. Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) Farmland Map: Orange County, California. Sacramento, CA: FMMP. Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). 2016 (October 17). The EDR Radius MapTM Report with GeoCheck®: Anaheim Element Hotel, 200 West Alro Way, Anaheim, California 92802 (Inquiry Number 4755543.2s). Milford, CT: EDR. Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (Giles). 2016 (September 6). Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis, Proposed Starwood Element Hotel, 200 W. Alro Way, Anaheim, California. Orange, CA: Giles. Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG). 2016 (August 30). Trip Generation Analysis for the Proposed Element Hotel, Anaheim, California. Irvine, CA: LLG. Newson Brown Acoustics LLC. 2016 (September 15). Alro Way Hotel Exterior Noise Survey and Glazing Recommendations. Santa Monica, CA: Newson Brown Acoustics LLC. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA). 2015. Bus Service. Santa Ana, CA: OCTA. http://www.octa.net/bus-system-map.aspx. Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner). 2016 (May 6). Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Report, Commercial Property, 200 West Alro Way, Anaheim, California 92805. Torrance, CA: Partner. Psomas. 2016 (October 25). Biological Resources Analysis for the Anaheim Element Hotel Project in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. Santa Ana, CA: Psomas. ———. 2009 (November). Amendment to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment. Santa Ana, CA: Psomas. ———. 2010 (November). Project Water Demand and Regional Supply Update Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment, City of Anaheim. Santa Ana, CA: Psomas. Southern California Gas Company (SCGC). 2016. Company Profile. http://www.socalgas.com/ about-us/company-info.shtml. San Diego, CA: Sempra Energy. Time Warner Cable, Inc. (TWC). 2016. About Us. TWC. Anaheim, CA: TimeWarner Cable. http://www.timewarnercable.com/en/about-us.html. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 2013a. California Emission Estimator Model (CalEEMod)TM Version 2013.2 Developed by Environ International Corporation in Collaboration with SCAQMD and other California Air Districts. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. ———. 2013b (February). 2012 Air Quality Management Plan. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/aqmp/2012aqmp/index.htm. ———. 2010 (September). Greenhouse Gases CEQA Significant Thresholds Working Group Meeting #15. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. ———. 2009 (October 21). Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology, Appendix C. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. Starwood Element Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 8-3 References ———. 1993 (November, as revised). CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD ———. 1976a (May 7, adopted). Rule 402: Nuisance. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/reg/reg04/r402.pdf. ———. 1976b (May, as amended through 2005). Rule 403: Fugitive Dust. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. http://www.aqmd.gov/rules/reg/reg04/r403.pdf. Walden & Associates. 2016a (August 29). Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan, Element Hotel, 200 Alro Way, Anaheim, CA 92802. Irvine, CA: Walden & Associates. ———. 2016b. Preliminary Drainage Study, Element Hotel, 200 Alro Way, Anaheim, CA 92802. Irvine, CA: Vista Environmental. Vista Environmental. 2016a (November 1). City of Anaheim – Element Hotel Project Noise Technical Memorandum. Laguna Beach, CA: Vista Environmental. ———. 2016b (October 25). City of Anaheim – Element Hotel Project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum. Laguna Beach, CA: Vista Environmental. Starwood Element Hotel Project Addendum to EIR 311 and EIR 340 R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Addendum\Starwood Element Hotel Addendum-122316.docx 8-4 References This page intentionally left blank APPENDIX A AMC 18.114.100 – COMMERCIAL-RECREATION OVERLAY 18.114.100 C-R OVERLAY. .010 Purpose. The C-R Overlay has been established to permit the uses set forth in Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone) if the properties are not developed as part of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. (Ord. 5580 § 24 (part); October 22, 1996.) .020 Permitted Primary Uses and Structures. All primary uses and structures permitted in subsection 18.116.070.020 (Permitted Primary Uses and Structures) but subject to the limitations prescribed in Section 18.114.050 (Land Use and Site Development Standards - General), subsection 18.114.100.060 (C-R Overlay Density), subsection 18.116.070.010 (Permitted Uses and Structures - General) and subsection 18.116.070.060 (Prohibited Uses). (Ord. 5580 § 24 (part); October 22, 1996.) .030 Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures. All accessory uses and structures permitted in subsection 18.116.070.030 (Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures). (Ord. 5580 § 24 (part); October 22, 1996.) .040 Permitted Temporary Uses and Structures. All temporary uses and structures permitted in the subsection 18.116.070.040 (Permitted Temporary Uses and Structures). (Ord. 5580 § 24 (part); October 22, 1996.) .050 Conditional Uses. All conditional uses and structures listed in subsection 18.116.070.050 (Conditional Uses and Structures). (Ord. 5580 § 24 (part); October 22, 1996.) .060 C-R Overlay Density. The C-R Overlay Density designations are based upon hotel/motel development and allow up to twenty percent (20%) of each hotel/motel project's gross square footage, excluding parking facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main hotel/motel complex) accessory uses. These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotel/motel density at the rate of one hotel/motel room per six hundred (600) gross square feet of accessory use area. For properties proposed to be developed with permitted or conditionally permitted uses other than hotels/motels with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel/motel density (including accessory uses) as determined by the City's Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval. The maximum number of hotels/motels permitted within the C-R Overlay shall be: .0601 For parcels designated Low Density on Exhibit 3.3.5a (C-R Overlay) of the Specific Plan document, up to fifty (50) hotel/motel rooms per gross acre or seventy-five (75) hotel/motel rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date of adoption of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (June 29, 1993), whichever is greater. .0602 For parcels designated Medium Density on Exhibit 3.3.5a entitled "C-R Overlay" of the Specific Plan document, up to seventy-five (75) hotel/motel per gross acre or seventy-five (75) rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date of adoption of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (June 29, 1993), whichever is greater. .0603 For parcels that are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (June 29, 1993) may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density. (Ord. 5580 § 24 (part); October 22, 1996.) .0604 Densities of contiguous parcels/lots may be combined for the purpose of developing a master plan project without processing a subdivision map to combine the parcels/lots subject to the following: .01 That the density on one or more parcels/lots may exceed the maximum density allowed for said parcel/lot provided that: the maximum overall density permitted for the combined parcels/lots is not exceeded, the proposed project does not exceed traffic impacts associated with the otherwise permitted hotel/motel density as determined by the City's Traffic and Transportation Manager and the environmental effects associated with the proposed project are consistent with those cleared by the Environmental Impact Report for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (EIR No. 311) or other final environmental documentation. Page 1 of 2Chapter 18.114 DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-1 (SP 92-1) ZONIN... 3/2/2015http://amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/California/anaheim/title18zoning/chapter18114disneyla... .02 That the proposed density for each parcel/lot is shown on the Final Site Plan processed in accordance with paragraph 18.114.040.020.0201 (Process for Approval). .03 That an unsubordinated covenant be recorded on each of the affected parcels limiting the density on each parcel to that shown on the approved Final Site Plan and that said covenant be recorded prior to the issuance of the first building permit for the master plan development. The covenant shall be prepared in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney and shall be recorded with the Office of the Orange County Recorder. A copy of the recorded covenant shall then be submitted to the Planning Division of the Planning Department. .070 Maximum Permitted Heights. The maximum permitted height of structures shall be as indicated on Amended Exhibit 1. (Ord. 5613 § 10; September 16, 1997.) .080 Interior Structural Setback and Yard Requirements from Adjacent Interior Lots. The following minimum setback requirements apply to structures developed under the provisions of Section 18.114.100 (C-R Overlay), except as provided elsewhere in this chapter: ten (10) feet minimum. .090 Setbacks from Abutting Public Rights-of-Way. The minimum setback requirements for structures developed under the provisions of this section shall be as described for the base District the structure is located in and in accordance with Section 18.116.100 (Central Core) with the following exceptions: .0901 Clementine Street. Twenty (20) feet minimum, if the height of the structure is seventy-five feet or less in height or thirty (30) feet minimum, if the height of the structure is greater than seventy-five (75) feet. .0902 Disney Way. Twenty (20) feet minimum, if the height of the structure is seventy-five feet or less in height or thirty (30) feet minimum, if the height of the structure is greater than seventy-five (75) feet. .0903 Katella Avenue. Eleven (11) feet minimum, with landscaping consistent with Design Plan cross section Numbers 3a and 3b. (Ord. 5378 § 1 (part); June 29, 1993; Ord. 5920 § 1 (part); June 8, 2004.) Page 2 of 2Chapter 18.114 DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-1 (SP 92-1) ZONIN... 3/2/2015http://amlegal.com/nxt/gateway.dll/California/anaheim/title18zoning/chapter18114disneyla... APPENDIX B AIR QUALITY AND GREENHOUSE GAS REPORT VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM Page 1 OF 19 November 1, 2016 Jennifer Marks BonTerra Psomas 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 Santa Ana, CA 92707 Subject: City of Anaheim – Element Hotel Project Air Quality and Greenhouse Gas Emissions Technical Memorandum. Dear Ms. Marks: Vista Environmental has conducted an analysis to evaluate whether the Element Hotel project (proposed project) would cause significant air quality or greenhouse gas impacts. This assessment was conducted within the context of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA, California Public Resources Code Sections 21000, et seq.). The methodology follows the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) recommendations for quantification of emissions and evaluation of potential air quality and greenhouse gas impacts. Project Description The project site is currently occupied by a 30,720 square foot vacant furniture store (formerly Bergstrom), with an approximately 82-space parking lot and Alro Way east of Clementine Street that would be vacated as part of the proposed project. The proposed project would consist of demolition of the existing improvements on the project site and construction of a 174-room, 5-story hotel with a 133-space parking lot. The project site is bounded by Interstate 5 to the northeast and Clementine Street the northwest. The Country Inn & Suites is currently under construction on the adjacent L shaped parcel on the south and west sides of the project site and the proposed hotel structure will be located approximately 85 feet south of the project site. The nearest offsite sensitive receptors to the project site consist of a mobile home park located on the east side of Interstate 5 and as near as 500 feet north of the project site. The nearest K12 school to the project site is Paul Revere Elementary School, located as near as 0.34 miles north of the project site. Atmospheric Setting Air quality is a function of both the rate and location of pollutant emissions under the influence of meteorological conditions and topographical features. Atmospheric conditions such as wind speed, wind direction, and air temperature gradients interact with physical features of the landscape to determine their movement and dispersal, and consequently, their effect on air quality. The combination of topography and inversion layers generally prevents dispersion of air pollutants in the Air Basin. The climate of the Air Basin lies in the semipermanent high-pressure zone of the eastern Pacific, which results in a mild climate, tempered by cool sea breezes. Although the Air Basin has a semiarid climate, the air near the surface is typically moist because of the presence of a shallow marine layer. Except for VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 2 of 19 infrequent periods when dry air is brought into the basin by offshore winds, the ocean effect is dominant. Periods of heavy fog are frequent; and low stratus clouds, often referred to as “high fog” are a characteristic climate feature. Average temperatures for Anaheim, which is the nearest monitoring station to the project site (WRCC 2016), range from an average low of 47.5 degrees Fahrenheit (°F) in January to an average high of 87.1 °F in August. Rainfall averages approximately 14.09 inches a year, with almost all annual rainfall coming from the fringes of mid-latitude storms from late November to early April and summers being almost completely dry. Winds are an important parameter in characterizing the air quality environment of a project site because they determine the regional pattern of air pollution transport and control the rate of dispersion near a source. Daytime winds in the Air Basin are usually light breezes from off the coast as air moves regionally onshore from the cool Pacific Ocean. These winds are usually the strongest in the dry summer months. Nighttime winds in the Air Basin result mainly from the drainage of cool air off the mountains to the east, and they occur more often during the winter months and are usually lighter than the daytime winds. Between the periods of dominant airflow, periods of air stagnation may occur, both in the morning and evening hours. Whether such a period of stagnation occurs is one of the critical determinants of air quality conditions on any given day. During the winter and fall months, surface high-pressure systems north of the Air Basin, combined with other meteorological conditions, can result in very strong winds from the northeast called “Santa Ana Winds.” These winds normally have durations of a few days before predominant meteorological conditions are reestablished. The highest wind speed typically occurs during the afternoon due to daytime thermal convection caused by surface heating. This convection brings about a downward transfer of momentum from stronger winds aloft. It is not uncommon to have sustained winds of 60 miles per hour with higher gusts during a Santa Ana Wind. Regulatory Setting The Proposed Project site lies within the Air Basin, which is managed by the SCAQMD. National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and California Ambient Air Quality Standards (CAAQS) have been established for the following criteria pollutants: carbon monoxide (CO), ozone, sulfur dioxide (SO2), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), inhalable particulate matter (PM10), fine particulate matter (PM2.5), and lead. The CAAQS also set standards for sulfates, hydrogen sulfide, and visibility. Areas are classified under the Federal Clean Air Act as either “attainment” or “nonattainment” areas for each criteria pollutant, based on whether the NAAQS have been achieved or not. Attainment relative to the state standards is determined by the California Air Resources Board (CARB). The Air Basin has been designated by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) as a nonattainment area for O3 and suspended particulates (PM10 and PM2.5). Currently, the Air Basin is in attainment with the ambient air quality standards for CO, SO2, and NO2. The Air Basin is designated as partial nonattainment for lead and is based on two source specific monitors in Vernon and in the City of Industry that are both near battery recycling facilities. The 2012 Lead SIP for Los Angeles County provides measures to meet attainment of lead by December 31, 2015. The EPA has designated Air Basin as extreme nonattainment for the 8-hour average ozone standard. On March 12, 2008, the EPA strengthened its 8-hour “primary” and “secondary” ozone standards to 0.075 parts per million (ppm). The previous standard, set in 1997, was 0.08 ppm. The SCAQMD, the agency principally responsible for comprehensive air pollution control in the Air Basin, developed the VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 3 of 19 2007 Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) that was approved by CARB on September 27, 2007 and provides measures to reduce 8-hour ozone levels to below the federal standard by June 15, 2021. Additionally, the EPA has designated Air Basin as nonattainment for PM2.5 and PM10. In 1997, the EPA established standards for PM2.5 (particles less than 2.5 micrometers), which were not implemented until March 2002. PM2.5 is a subset of the PM10 emissions whose standards were developed to complement the PM10 standards that cover a full range of inhalable particle matter. For the PM10 health standards, the annual PM10 standard was revoked by the EPA on October 17, 2006; and the 24-hour average PM10 attainment status was redesignated to attainment (maintenance) on July 26, 2013. The 2007 AQMP provides measures to reduce PM2.5 emissions to within the federal standard by 2015. On January 25, 2013 the CARB approved the 2012 AQMP that was prepared per the federal Clean Air Act requirements to show attainment of the PM2.5 standard by the revised date of 2014. The 2012 AQMP builds upon the approaches taken in the 2007 AQMP utilized to reduce PM2.5 emissions in the Air Basin. On December 14, 2012, the EPA revised the primary annual PM2.5 NAAQS from 15 µg/m3 to 12 µg/m3. The SCAQMD is currently working on the preparation of a new air quality management plan in order to meet the revised PM2.5 standard. The Air Basin has been designated by CARB as a nonattainment area for ozone, NO2, PM10, PM2.5, and lead. Currently, the Air Basin is in attainment with the state ambient air quality standards for CO, SO2, and sulfates and is unclassified for visibility-reducing particles and hydrogen sulfide. The 2007 and 2012 AQMPs provide measures to meet the state standards for ozone, NO2, PM10, and PM2.5. Monitored Air Quality The air quality at any site is dependent on the regional air quality and local pollutant sources. Regional air quality is determined by the release of pollutants throughout the air basin. Estimates of the existing emissions in the Air Basin provided in the Final 2012 AQMP, December 2012, indicate that, collectively, mobile sources account for 59 percent of the volatile organic compounds (VOC), 88 percent of the NOx emissions, and 40 percent of directly emitted PM2.5, with another 10 percent of PM2.5 from road dust. The SCAQMD has divided the Air Basin into 38 air monitoring areas with a designated ambient air monitoring station representative of each area. The project site is located in Air Monitoring Area 17, which covers central Orange County. The nearest air monitoring station to the project site is the Anaheim-Pampas Lane Station (Anaheim Station), located approximately 2 miles northwest of the project site at 1630 West Pampas Lane, Anaheim. Since historical concentrations of carbon monoxide were found to be well below state and federal limits throughout the Air Basin, SCAQMD discontinued monitoring of carbon monoxide levels on March 31, 2013. It should be noted that due to the air monitoring station’s distance from the project site, recorded air pollution levels at the Anaheim Station reflect with varying degrees of accuracy local air quality conditions at the proposed project site. Table A presents the composite of gaseous pollutants monitored from 2013 through 2015. VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 4 of 19 Table A – Local Area Air Quality Monitoring Summary Pollutant (Standard) Year1 2013 2014 2015 Ozone: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.084 0.111 0.100 Days > CAAQS (0.09 ppm) 0 2 1 Maximum 8-Hour Concentration (ppm) 0.070 0.082 0.081 Days > NAAQS (0.075 ppm) 0 4 1 Days > CAAQs (0.070 ppm) 0 6 1 Nitrogen Dioxide: Maximum 1-Hour Concentration (ppb) 81.5 75.8 59.1 Days > NAAQS (100 ppb) 0 0 0 Inhalable Particulates (PM10): Maximum 24-Hour California Measurement (ug/m3) 77.0 84.0 59.0 Days > NAAQS (150 ug/m3) 0 0 0 Days > CAAQS (50 ug/m3) 1 2 2 Annual Arithmetic Mean (AAM) (ug/m3) 25.4 26.8 25.5 Annual > NAAQS (50 ug/m3) No No No Annual > CAAQS (20 ug/m3) Yes Yes Yes Ultra-Fine Particulates (PM2.5): Maximum 24-Hour National Measurement (ug/m3) 37.8 45 45.8 Days > NAAQS (35 ug/m3) 1 4 3 Annual Arithmetic Mean (AAM) (ug/m3) 10.1 16.1 14.8 Annual > NAAQS and CAAQS (12 ug/m3) No Yes Yes Notes: Exceedances are listed in bold. CAAQS = California Ambient Air Quality Standard; NAAQS = National Ambient Air Quality Standard; ppm = parts per million; ppb = parts per billion; ND = no data available. 1 Data obtained from the Anaheim Station. Source: http://www.arb.ca.gov/adam/ Impact Analysis CEQA Thresholds of Significance Consistent with CEQA and the State CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to air quality and global climate change would occur if the proposed project is determined to result in:  Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan; VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 5 of 19  Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation;  Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors);  Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations;  Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people.  Generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment; or  Conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of GHGs. Impact 1: Air Quality Compliance The proposed project would not conflict with or obstruct implementation of the SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP). The following section discusses the proposed project’s consistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. SCAQMD Air Quality Management Plan The California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) requires a discussion of any inconsistencies between a proposed project and applicable GPs and regional plans (CEQA Guidelines Section 15125). The regional plan that applies to the proposed project includes the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, this section discusses any potential inconsistencies of the proposed project with the AQMP. The purpose of this discussion is to set forth the issues regarding consistency with the assumptions and objectives of the AQMP and discuss whether the proposed project would interfere with the region’s ability to comply with Federal and State air quality standards. If the decision-makers determine that the proposed project is inconsistent, the lead agency may consider project modifications or inclusion of mitigation to eliminate the inconsistency. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that "New or amended GP Elements (including land use zoning and density amendments), Specific Plans, and significant projects must be analyzed for consistency with the AQMP." Strict consistency with all aspects of the plan is usually not required. A proposed project should be considered to be consistent with the AQMP if it furthers one or more policies and does not obstruct other policies. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook identifies two key indicators of consistency: (1) Whether the project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations or cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards or the interim emission reductions specified in the AQMP. (2) Whether the project will exceed the assumptions in the AQMP or increments based on the year of project buildout and phase. Both of these criteria are evaluated in the following sections. VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 6 of 19 Criterion 1 - Increase in the Frequency or Severity of Violations? Based on the air quality modeling analysis contained in this report, short-term regional construction air emissions would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD regional thresholds of significance discussed in Table B or local thresholds of significance discussed in Table C. The ongoing operation of the proposed project would generate air pollutant emissions that are inconsequential on a regional basis and would not result in significant impacts based on SCAQMD thresholds of significance discussed in Table B. The analysis for long-term local air quality impacts showed that local pollutant concentrations would not be projected to exceed the air quality standards. Therefore, no long-term impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, based on the information provided above, the proposed project would be consistent with the first criterion. Criterion 2 - Exceed Assumptions in the AQMP? Consistency with the AQMP assumptions is determined by performing an analysis of the proposed project with the assumptions in the AQMP. The emphasis of this criterion is to insure that the analyses conducted for the proposed project are based on the same forecasts as the AQMP. The 2012-2035 Regional Transportation/Sustainable Communities Strategy consists of three sections: Core Chapters, Ancillary Chapters, and Bridge Chapters. The Growth Management, Regional Mobility, Air Quality, Water Quality, and Hazardous Waste Management chapters constitute the Core Chapters of the document. These chapters currently respond directly to federal and state requirements placed on SCAG. Local governments are required to use these as the basis of their plans for purposes of consistency with applicable regional plans under CEQA. For this project, the City of Anaheim Land Use Plan defines the assumptions that are represented in the AQMP. The project site is currently designated as Commercial Recreation in the General Plan and is zoned Disneyland Resort (SP 92-1). The proposed project is consistent with the current land use designation and zoning and would not require a General Plan Amendment or zone change. As such, the proposed project is not anticipated to exceed the AQMP assumptions for the project site and is found to be consistent with the AQMP for the second criterion. Based on the above, the proposed project will not result in an inconsistency with the SCAQMD AQMP. Therefore, a less than significant impact will occur in relation to implementation of the AQMP. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. Impact 2: Air Quality Standard Violation The proposed project would not violate an air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation. The following section calculates the potential air emissions associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project and compares the emissions to the SCAQMD standards. To estimate if the Proposed Project may adversely affect the air quality in the region, the SCAQMD has prepared CEQA Air Quality Handbook (SCAQMD 1993) to provide guidance to those who analyze the air quality impacts of proposed projects. The SCAQMD CEQA Handbook states that any project in the Air Basin with daily emissions that exceed any of the identified significance thresholds should be considered as having an individually and cumulatively significant air quality impact. For the purposes of VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 7 of 19 this air quality impact analysis, a regional air quality impact would be considered significant if emissions exceed the SCAQMD significance thresholds identified in Table B. Table B – SCAQMD Regional Criteria Pollutant Emission Thresholds of Significance Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) VOC NOx CO SOx PM10 PM2.5 Lead Construction 75 100 550 150 150 55 3 Operation 55 55 550 150 150 55 3 Source: http://www.aqmd.gov/ceqa/handbook/signthres.pdf Project-related construction air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. In order to assess local air quality impacts the SCAQMD has developed Localized Significant Thresholds (LSTs) to assess the project-related air emissions in the project vicinity. SCAQMD has also provided Final Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), July 2008, which details the methodology to analyze local air emission impacts. The LST Methodology found that the primary emissions of concern are NO2, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. The LST Methodology provides Look-Up Tables with different thresholds based on the location and size of the project site and distance to the nearest sensitive receptors. The project site is approximately 2.11 acres, which is closest to the 2-acre project site shown in the Look-Up Tables and was utilized for this analysis. As detailed above, the project site is located in Air Monitoring Area 17, which covers central Orange County. The nearest sensitive receptors are mobile homes located as near as 500 feet (152 meters) north of the project site. There is also the Country Inn & Suites hotel rooms that are located as near as 85 feet (26 meters) south of the project site. It should be noted that hotel rooms are a commercial use and not normally considered as sensitive receptors, however in order to provide a conservative analysis they have been analyzed as the nearest sensitive receptors. Since the Look-Up Tables only provide emissions thresholds for 25, 50, 100, 200, and 500 meters, the 25 meters emissions thresholds were utilized since they are the nearest available thresholds to a distance of 26 meters and are shown below in Table C. Table C – SCAQMD Local Air Quality Thresholds of Significance Activity Allowable Emissions (pounds/day)1 NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Construction 115 715 6 4 Operation 115 715 2 1 Notes: 1 The 25 meter threshold was utilized in this analysis, since the nearest sensitive receptors are hotel rooms located as near as 85 feet (26 meters) south of the project site. Source: Calculated from SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for two acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. Construction Emissions The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include: (1) Demolition of the existing 30,720 square foot commercial building and associated parking lot and portion of Alro Way that is on the project site; (2) Grading of the project site and excavation of the proposed underground parking that will require the export of approximately 15,129 cubic yards of dirt from the project site; (3) Building VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 8 of 19 construction of a 174-room, 5-story hotel; (4) Paving of a 133-space parking lot; and (5) application of architectural coatings. The construction emissions have been analyzed for both regional and local air quality impacts as well as potential toxic air impacts. Construction-Related Regional Impacts The CalEEMod model has been utilized to calculate the construction-related regional emissions from the proposed project. The worst-case summer or winter daily construction-related criteria pollutant emissions from the proposed project for each phase of construction activities are shown below in Table D and the CalEEMod daily printouts are shown in Appendix A. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently, Table D also shows the combined criteria pollutant emissions from building construction, paving and architectural coating phases of construction. Table D – Construction-Related Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Demolition1 Onsite 2.39 23.50 19.70 0.02 2.38 1.43 Offsite 0.29 3.44 3.82 0.01 0.45 0.16 Total 2.68 26.94 23.52 0.03 2.83 1.59 Grading Onsite 2.37 24.61 17.72 0.02 3.93 2.55 Offsite 1.40 19.84 17.85 0.06 1.85 0.71 Total 3.77 44.45 35.57 0.08 5.78 3.26 Building Construction Onsite 2.90 20.56 15.66 0.02 1.25 1.20 Offsite 0.45 2.34 6.36 0.02 0.99 0.29 Total 3.35 22.90 22.02 0.04 2.24 1.49 Paving Onsite 1.28 12.41 11.70 0.02 0.72 0.67 Offsite 0.05 0.06 0.74 0.00 0.17 0.05 Total 1.33 12.47 12.44 0.02 0.89 0.72 Architectural Coatings Onsite 32.35 1.84 1.84 0.00 0.13 0.13 Offsite 0.04 0.06 0.69 0.00 0.16 0.04 Total 32.39 1.90 2.53 0.00 0.29 0.17 Combined Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coatings 37.07 37.27 36.99 0.06 3.42 2.38 SCQAMD Thresholds 75 100 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Notes: 1 Demolition and Grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 2 Onsite emissions from equipment not operated on public roads. 3 Offsite emissions from vehicles operating on public roads. Source: CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2. VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 9 of 19 Table D shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Construction-Related Local Impacts Construction-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The local air quality emissions from construction were analyzed through utilizing the methodology described in Localized Significance Threshold Methodology (LST Methodology), prepared by SCAQMD, revised October 2009. The LST Methodology found the primary criteria pollutant emissions of concern are NOx, CO, PM10, and PM2.5. In order to determine if any of these pollutants require a detailed analysis of the local air quality impacts, each phase of construction was screened using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate LST Look-up Tables. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily onsite emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table E shows the onsite emissions from the CalEEMod model for the different construction phases and the calculated emissions thresholds that have been detailed above. Since it is possible that building construction, paving, and architectural coating activities may occur concurrently, Table E also shows the combined local criteria pollutant emissions from building construction, paving and architectural coating phases of construction. Table E – Construction-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Phase NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Demolition1 23.50 19.70 2.38 1.43 Grading1 24.61 17.72 3.93 2.55 Building Construction 20.56 15.66 1.25 1.20 Paving 12.41 11.70 0.72 0.67 Architectural Coatings 1.84 1.84 0.13 0.13 Combined Building Construction, Paving, and Architectural Coatings 34.81 29.20 2.10 2.00 SCAQMD Thresholds for 25 meters (82 feet)2 115 715 6 4 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 Demolition and Grading based on adherence to fugitive dust suppression requirements from SCAQMD Rule 403. 2 The 25 meter threshold was utilized in this analysis, since the nearest sensitive receptors are hotel rooms located as near as 85 feet (26 meters) south of the project site. Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for two acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. The data provided in Table E shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the local emissions thresholds for any phase of construction. Therefore, a less than significant local air quality impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Operational Emissions The on-going operation of the proposed project would result in a long-term increase in air quality emissions. This increase would be due to emissions from the project-generated vehicle trips and through VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 10 of 19 operational emissions from the on-going use of the proposed project. The following section provides an analysis of potential long-term air quality impacts due to: regional air quality and local air quality impacts with the on-going operations of the proposed project. The potential operations-related air emissions have been analyzed below for the regional and local criteria pollutant emissions and cumulative impacts. Operations-Related Criteria Pollutant Analysis The operations-related criteria air quality impacts created by the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the CalEEMod model and the input parameters utilized in this. The worst-case summer or winter VOC, NOx, CO, SO2, PM10, and PM2.5 daily emissions created from the proposed project’s long- term operations have been calculated and are summarized below in Table F and the CalEEMod daily emissions printouts are shown in Appendix A. Table F – Operational Regional Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) Activity VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources1 4.16 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage2 0.09 0.85 0.71 0.01 0.06 0.06 Mobile Sources3 4.09 9.92 39.59 0.11 7.36 2.06 Total Emissions 8.34 10.77 40.33 0.12 7.42 2.12 SCQAMD Operational Thresholds 55 55 550 150 150 55 Exceeds Threshold? no no no no no no Notes: 1 Area sources consist of emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consist of emissions from natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of emissions from vehicles and road dust. Source: Calculated from CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2. The data provided in Table F above shows that none of the analyzed criteria pollutants would exceed the regional emissions thresholds. Therefore, a less than significant regional air quality impact would occur from operation of the proposed project. Operations-Related Local Air Quality Impacts Project-related air emissions may have the potential to exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The proposed project has been analyzed for the potential local CO emission impacts from the project-generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from on-site operations. The following analysis analyzes the vehicular CO emissions and local impacts from on-site operations. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicular Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential local air quality impacts. Local air quality impacts can be assessed by comparing future without and with project CO levels to the State and Federal CO standards of 20 ppm over one hour or 9 ppm over eight hours. At the time of the 1993 Handbook, the Air Basin was designated nonattainment under the CAAQS and NAAQS for CO. With the turnover of older vehicles, introduction of cleaner fuels, and implementation of VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 11 of 19 control technology on industrial facilities, CO concentrations in the Air Basin and in the state have steadily declined. In 2007, the Air Basin was designated in attainment for CO under both the CAAQS and NAAQS. SCAQMD conducted a CO hot spot analysis for attainment at the busiest intersections in Los Angeles during the peak morning and afternoon periods and did not predict a violation of CO standards1. Since the nearby intersections to the proposed project are much smaller with less traffic than what was analyzed by the SCAQMD, no local CO Hotspot are anticipated to be created from the proposed project and no CO Hotspot modeling was performed. Therefore, a less than significant long-term air quality impact is anticipated to local air quality with the on-going use of the proposed project. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations Project-related air emissions from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and onsite usage of natural gas appliances may have the potential to create emissions areas that exceed the State and Federal air quality standards in the project vicinity, even though these pollutant emissions may not be significant enough to create a regional impact to the Air Basin. The local air quality emissions from on-site operations were analyzed using the SCAQMD’s Mass Rate LST Look-up Tables and the methodology described in LST Methodology. The Look-up Tables were developed by the SCAQMD in order to readily determine if the daily emissions of CO, NOx, PM10, and PM2.5 from the proposed project could result in a significant impact to the local air quality. Table G shows the on-site emissions from the CalEEMod model that includes area sources, energy usage, and vehicles operating on-site and the calculated emissions thresholds. Table G – Operations-Related Local Criteria Pollutant Emissions Pollutant Emissions (pounds/day) On-Site Emission Source NOx CO PM10 PM2.5 Area Sources 0.00 0.03 0.00 0.00 Energy Usage 0.85 0.71 0.06 0.06 Onsite Vehicle Emissions1 1.24 4.95 0.92 0.26 Total Emissions 2.09 5.69 0.98 0.32 SCAQMD Thresholds for 25 meters (82 feet)2 115 715 2 1 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No Notes: 1 Onsite vehicle emissions based on 1/8 of the gross vehicular emissions, which is the estimated portion of vehicle emissions occurring within a quarter mile of the project site. 2 The 25 meter threshold was utilized in this analysis, since the nearest sensitive receptors are hotel rooms located as near as 85 feet (26 meters) south of the project site.. Source: Calculated from CalEEMod and SCAQMD’s Mass Rate Look-up Tables for two acres in Air Monitoring Area 17, Central Orange County. The data provided in Table G shows that the on-going operations of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above. Therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations-related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions and no mitigation would be required. 1 The four intersections analyzed by the SCAQMD were: Long Beach Boulevard and Imperial Highway; Wilshire Boulevard and Veteran Avenue; Sunset Boulevard and Highland Avenue; and La Cienega Boulevard and Century Boulevard. The busiest intersection evaluated (Wilshire and Veteran) had a daily traffic volume of approximately 100,000 vehicles per day with LOS E in the morning and LOS F in the evening peak hour. VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 12 of 19 Level of Significance Less than significant impact. Impact 3: Cumulative Net Increase in Non-Attainment Pollution The proposed project would not result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors). Cumulative projects include local development as well as general growth within the project area. However, as with most development, the greatest source of emissions is from mobile sources, which travel throughout the local area. Therefore, from an air quality standpoint, the cumulative analysis would extend beyond any local projects and when wind patterns are considered would cover an even larger area. Accordingly, the cumulative analysis for the project’s air quality must be generic by nature. The project area is out of attainment for ozone and PM10 and PM2.5 particulate matter. In accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15130(b), this analysis of cumulative impacts incorporates a three-tiered approach to assess cumulative air quality impacts.  Consistency with the SCAQMD project specific thresholds for construction and operations;  Project consistency with existing air quality plans; and  Assessment of the cumulative health effects of the pollutants. Consistency with Project Specific Thresholds Construction-Related Impacts The project site is located in the South Coast Air Basin, which is currently designated by the EPA for federal standards as a non-attainment area for ozone and PM2.5 and by CARB for the state standards as a non-attainment area for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5. The regional ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions associated with construction of the proposed project have been calculated above in Table D. The above analysis found that development of the proposed project would result in less than significant regional emissions of VOC and NOx (ozone precursors), PM10, and PM2.5 during construction of the proposed project. Therefore, a less than significant cumulative impact would occur from construction of the proposed project. Operational-Related Impacts The greatest cumulative operational impact on the air quality to the Air Basin will be the incremental addition of pollutants mainly from increased traffic from residential, commercial, and industrial development. In accordance with SCAQMD methodology, projects that do not exceed SCAQMD criteria or can be mitigated to less than criteria levels are not significant and do not add to the overall cumulative impact. The regional ozone, PM10, and PM2.5 emissions created from the on-going operations of the proposed project have been calculated above. The above analysis found that development of the proposed project would result in less than significant regional emissions of VOC and NOx (ozone precursors), PM10, and PM2.5 during operation of the proposed project. With respect to long-term emissions, this project would create a less than significant cumulative impact. VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 13 of 19 Consistency with Air Quality Plans As detailed above, the project site is currently designated as Commercial Recreation in the General Plan and is zoned The Disneyland Resort (SP 92-1). The proposed project is consistent with the current land use designation and zoning and would not require a General Plan Amendment or zone change. Therefore, the proposed project would not result in an inconsistency with the current land use designations with respect to the regional forecasts utilized by the AQMPs. Cumulative Health Impacts The Air Basin is designated as nonattainment for ozone, PM10, and PM2.5, which means that the background levels of those pollutants are at times higher than the ambient air quality standards. The air quality standards were set to protect public health, including the health of sensitive individuals (elderly, children, and the sick). Therefore, when the concentrations of those pollutants exceeds the standard, it is likely that some sensitive individuals in the population would experience health effects. The regional analysis detailed above found that the proposed project would not exceed the SCAQMD regional significance thresholds for VOC and NOx (ozone precursors), PM10 and PM2.5. As such, the proposed project would result in a less than significant cumulative health impact. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. Impact 4: Sensitive Receptors The proposed project would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. The local concentrations of criteria pollutant emissions produced in the nearby vicinity of the proposed project, which may expose sensitive receptors to substantial concentrations have been calculated above for both construction and operations, which are discussed separately below. The discussion below also includes an analysis of the potential impacts from toxic air contaminant emissions. The nearest offsite sensitive receptors are mobile homes located as near as 500 feet north of the project site. In addition, the Country Inn & Suites hotel room are located as near as 85 feet south of the project site, however it should be noted that hotel rooms are a commercial use and not normally considered as sensitive receptors. Construction-Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts Construction of the proposed project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of localized criteria pollutant concentrations and from toxic air contaminant emissions created from onsite construction equipment, which are described below. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Construction The local air quality impacts from construction of the proposed project has been analyzed above in Table E and found that the construction of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above in Table C. Therefore, construction of the proposed project would create a less than significant construction-related impact to local air quality and no mitigation would be required. Toxic Air Contaminants Impacts from Construction The greatest potential for toxic air contaminant emissions would be related to diesel particulate matter (DPM) emissions associated with heavy equipment operations during construction of the proposed VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 14 of 19 project. According to SCAQMD methodology, health effects from carcinogenic air toxics are usually described in terms of “individual cancer risk”. “Individual Cancer Risk” is the likelihood that a person exposed to concentrations of toxic air contaminants over a 70-year lifetime will contract cancer, based on the use of standard risk-assessment methodology. Given the relatively limited number of heavy-duty construction equipment and the short-term construction schedule, the proposed project would not result in a long-term (i.e., 70 years) substantial source of toxic air contaminant emissions and corresponding individual cancer risk. In addition, California Code of Regulations Title 13, Article 4.8, Chapter 9, Section 2449 regulates emissions from off-road diesel equipment in California. This regulation limits idling of equipment to no more than five minutes, requires equipment operators to label each piece of equipment and provide annual reports to CARB of their fleet’s usage and emissions. This regulation also requires systematic upgrading of the emission Tier level of each fleet, and currently no commercial operator is allowed to purchase Tier 0 or Tier 1 equipment and by January 2023 no commercial operator is allowed to purchase Tier 2 equipment. In addition to the purchase restrictions, equipment operators need to meet fleet average emissions targets that become more stringent each year between years 2014 and 2023. Therefore, no significant short-term toxic air contaminant impacts would occur during construction of the proposed project. As such, construction of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Operations-Related Sensitive Receptor Impacts The on-going operations of the proposed project may expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations of local CO emission impacts from the project-generated vehicular trips and from the potential local air quality impacts from onsite operations. The following analyzes the vehicular CO emissions. Local criteria pollutant impacts from onsite operations, and toxic air contaminant impacts. Local CO Hotspot Impacts from Project-Generated Vehicle Trips CO is the pollutant of major concern along roadways because the most notable source of CO is motor vehicles. For this reason, CO concentrations are usually indicative of the local air quality generated by a roadway network and are used as an indicator of potential impacts to sensitive receptors. The analysis provided above shows that no local CO Hotspots are anticipated to be created at any nearby intersections from the vehicle traffic generated by the proposed project. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of offsite sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Local Criteria Pollutant Impacts from Onsite Operations The local air quality impacts from the operation of the proposed project would occur from onsite sources such as architectural coatings, landscaping equipment, and onsite usage of natural gas appliances. The analysis provided above in Table E found that the operation of the proposed project would not exceed the local NOx, CO, PM10 and PM2.5 thresholds of significance discussed above in Table C. Therefore, the on-going operations of the proposed project would create a less than significant operations-related impact to local air quality due to on-site emissions and no mitigation would be required. Operations-Related Toxic Air Contaminant Impacts Particulate matter (PM) from diesel exhaust is the predominant TAC in most areas and according to The California Almanac of Emissions and Air Quality 2013 Edition, prepared by CARB, about 80 percent of the outdoor TAC cancer risk is from diesel exhaust. Some chemicals in diesel exhaust, such as benzene and formaldehyde have been listed as carcinogens by State Proposition 65 and the Federal Hazardous Air Pollutants program. Due to the nominal number of diesel truck trips generated by the proposed hotel VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 15 of 19 project, a less than significant toxic air contaminant impact would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project and no mitigation would be required. Therefore, operation of the proposed project would result in a less than significant exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. Impact 5: Objectionable Odors The proposed project would not create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people. Potential odor impacts have been analyzed separately for construction and operations below. Individual responses to odors are highly variable and can result in a variety of effects. Generally, the impact of an odor results from a variety of factors such as frequency, duration, offensiveness, location, and sensory perception. The frequency is a measure of how often an individual is exposed to an odor in the ambient environment. The intensity refers to an individual’s or group’s perception of the odor strength or concentration. The duration of an odor refers to the elapsed time over which an odor is experienced. The offensiveness of the odor is the subjective rating of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of an odor. The location accounts for the type of area in which a potentially affected person lives, works, or visits; the type of activity in which he or she is engaged; and the sensitivity of the impacted receptor. Sensory perception has four major components: detectability, intensity, character, and hedonic tone. The detection (or threshold) of an odor is based on a panel of responses to the odor. There are two types of thresholds: the odor detection threshold and the recognition threshold. The detection threshold is the lowest concentration of an odor that will elicit a response in a percentage of the people that live and work in the immediate vicinity of the project site and is typically presented as the mean (or 50 percent of the population). The recognition threshold is the minimum concentration that is recognized as having a characteristic odor quality, this is typically represented by recognition by 50 percent of the population. The intensity refers to the perceived strength of the odor. The odor character is what the substance smells like. The hedonic tone is a judgment of the pleasantness or unpleasantness of the odor. The hedonic tone varies in subjective experience, frequency, odor character, odor intensity, and duration. Construction-Related Odor Impacts Potential sources that may emit odors during construction activities include the application of materials such as asphalt pavement, paints and solvents and from emissions from diesel equipment. The objectionable odors that may be produced during the construction process would be temporary and would not likely be noticeable for extended periods of time beyond the project site’s boundaries. Due to the transitory nature of construction odors, a less than significant odor impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Potential Operations-Related Odor Impacts The proposed project would consist of the operation of a 174-room hotel with an outdoor recreation area with a pool and a 133-space parking lot. Potential sources that may emit odors during the on-going operations of the proposed project would primarily occur from odor emissions from the trash storage areas. Pursuant to City regulations, permanent trash enclosures that protect trash bins from rain as well as VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 16 of 19 limit air circulation would be required for the trash storage areas. Due to the distance of the nearest receptors from the project site and through compliance with SCAQMD’s Rule 402, no significant impact related to odors would occur during the on-going operations of the proposed project. Therefore, a less than significant odor impact would occur and no mitigation would be required. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. Impact 6: Generation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions The proposed project would not generate GHG emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment. The proposed project would consist of the demolition of the existing improvements on the project site and construction of a 174-room, 5-story hotel with a 133-space parking lot. The proposed project is anticipated to generate GHG emissions from area sources, energy usage, mobile sources, waste disposal, water usage, and construction equipment. The project’s GHG emissions have been calculated with the CalEEMod model. A summary of the results is shown below in Table H and the CalEEMod model run printout is attached to this letter. Table H – Proposed Project Greenhouse Gas Annual Emissions Greenhouse Gas Emissions (Metric Tons per Year) Category CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Area Sources1 0.01 0.00 0.00 0.01 Energy Usage2 479.09 0.02 0.01 481.33 Mobile Sources3 933.14 0.03 0.00 933.87 Solid Waste4 9.67 0.57 0.00 21.67 Water and Wastewate5 15.84 0.12 0.00 19.15 Construction6 15.43 0.00 0.00 15.48 Total Emissions 1453.18 0.74 0.01 1,471.51 SCAQMD Draft Threshold of Significance for All Land Use Types 3,000 Notes: 1 Area sources consist of GHG emissions from consumer products, architectural coatings, and landscaping equipment. 2 Energy usage consists of GHG emissions from electricity and natural gas usage. 3 Mobile sources consist of GHG emissions from vehicles. 4 Waste includes the CO2 and CH4 emissions created from the solid waste placed in landfills. 5 Water includes GHG emissions from electricity used for transport of water and processing of wastewater. 6 Construction emissions amortized over 30 years as recommended in the SCAQMD GHG Working Group on November 19, 2009. Source: CalEEMod Version 2013.2.2. The data provided in Table H above shows that the proposed project would create 1,471.51 MTCO2e per year. According to the SCAQMD draft threshold of significance, a cumulative global climate change impact would occur if the GHG emissions created from the on-going operations would exceed 3,000 MTCO2e per year. Therefore, a less than significant generation of greenhouse gas emissions would occur from development of the proposed project. Impacts would be less than significant. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 17 of 19 Impact 7: Greenhouse Gas Plan Consistency The proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The applicable plans for the proposed project consist of the City of Anaheim’s Greenhouse Gas Reduction Plan (GHG Reduction Plan), adopted July 2015, and the SCAQMD Working Group’s draft GHG thresholds. City of Anaheim The City of Anaheim’s GHG Reduction Plan provides reduction targets for energy usage, water conservation, photovoltaic (PV) rooftop installations, and transportation emissions. For energy usage, the GHG Reduction Plan provides a target of a 15 percent reduction by 2020 and a 30 percent reduction by 2030 of the energy utilized by businesses and homes in Anaheim. This target will be met through implementation of the following project features that the project applicant has stated will be incorporated into the project design:  Provide electric vehicle charging stations;  Provide preferred parking spaces for clean air vehicles;  Provide shuttle service to Disneyland;  Exceed Title 24 Part 6, energy efficiency standards;  Utilize high efficiency LED indoor and outdoor lighting;  Installation of low-flow toilets, faucets, and showers; and  Install water-efficient landscaping, with no turf. In addition, to the project design features, the proposed project would be required to meet State regulations that include Title 24, Part 6 California’s Energy Efficiency Standards for Buildings and Title 24, Part 11, California’s Green Building Standards, which require a variety of energy efficiency measures to be installed on new businesses that will reduce energy usage by 25 percent over the prior 2008 Title 24 Building Standards. New Title 24 Building Standards are anticipated to be released in 2016 and 2019 and the 2019 Title 24 Building Standards are required to meet a zero-net energy goal. Therefore, through implementation of the project design features listed above and State regulations, the proposed project will meet the energy use reduction targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan also includes water conservation targets of a 20 percent reduction by 2020 and a 25 percent reduction by 2030. As detailed above, the proposed hotel will include the following project design features: installation of low-flow toilets, faucets, and showers; and installation of water-efficient landscaping with no turf. These project design features would reduce the amount of water utilized by the proposed hotel and the proposed project would comply with this measure. The GHG Reduction Plan also includes a 2020 target of 27,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2020 and 37,000 kW of PV systems installed by 2030. This target will be met through application of State regulations including Title 24, Part 6. The 2013 Title 24 Building Standards require that new hotels are constructed to be solar ready to facilitate the installation of rooftop solar systems. This requirement is typically met through structural design to ensure that rooftops are designed to handle the weight of PV systems and through installation of electrical conduit from the main circuit panel area to the roof. The project applicant has stated that consideration is being given to providing a roof top PV system, however current PV installation incentives only apply to existing structures, so it is more feasible to construct VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 18 of 19 rooftop PV systems after the proposed hotel has been completed and has been operational for a period of time. Therefore, through implementation of the State regulations, the proposed project in association with future commercial projects in the City, will meet the PV rooftop installation targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. The GHG Reduction Plan also includes a 2020 target of a 6,000 MTCO2e reduction in vehicle emissions and a 2030 target of 20,000 MTCO2e reduction in vehicle emissions. As detailed above, the proposed hotel will include the following project design features: electric vehicle charging stations; preferred parking for clean air vehicles; and a shuttle service to and from the nearby Disneyland theme parks. These project design features would reduce vehicle emissions generated by the operation of the hotel and the proposed project would comply with this measure. Therefore, the proposed project would comply with the reduction targets provided in the GHG Reduction Plan. SCAQMD In order to identify significance criteria under CEQA for development projects, SCAQMD initiated a Working Group, which provided detailed methodology for evaluating significance under CEQA. At the September 28, 2010 Working Group meeting, the SCAQMD released its most current version of the draft GHG emissions thresholds, which recommends a tiered approach that provides a quantitative annual threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e for all land use type projects. Although the SCAQMD provided substantial evidence supporting the use of the above threshold, they have not been formally adopted because the SCAQMD was awaiting the outcome of the State Supreme Court decision of the California Building Industry Association v. Bay Area Air Quality Management District (BAAQMD), which was filed on December 17, 2015 and the SCAQMD Board has not yet approved these thresholds. According to the project GHG emissions calculations above, implementation of the proposed project would result in the generation of 1,471.51 MTCO2e per year. The proposed project would be below the SCAQMD’s proposed threshold of 3,000 MTCO2e. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. As detailed above, development of the proposed project would meet the targets outlined in the GHG Reduction Plan and meet SCAQMD’s bright line threshold. Therefore, the proposed project would not conflict with any applicable plan, policy or regulation of an agency adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. VISTA ENVIRONMENTAL 1021 DIDRIKSON WAY LAGUNA BEACH CALIFORNIA 92651 PHONE 949 510 5355 FACSIMILE 949 494 3150 EMAIL GREG@VISTALB.COM PAGE 19 of 19 Please let me know if you have any questions or need additional information with regard to the above analysis. I can be reached at (949) 510-5355, or email me at greg@vistalb.com. Sincerely, Greg Tonkovich, AICP Senior Analyst Vista Environmental Encl.: CalEEMod Printouts South Coast Air Basin, Summer Anaheim Element Hotel 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 61.00 Space 0.17 25,640.00 0 Parking Lot 70.00 Space 0.19 28,000.00 0 Hotel 174.00 Room 1.75 111,955.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 1 of 25 Project Characteristics - Land Use - 174-room Hotel on 1.75 acres/111,955 sqft. 61-space Enclosed parking w/ elevator on 0.17 acres/25,640 sqft. 70-space Parking Lot on 0.19 acres. Construction Phase - 20 days Demo, 15 days Grading, 220 days Construction, 10 days Paving, 40 painting. Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips added to demo and grading to account for water trucks. Demolition - 30,720 sf building x 0.046 tons per sf + 42,000 sf of pavement x 145 lb per sf = 2,428 tons. Grading - 15,129 CY exported for excavation of basement. Architectural Coating - VOC set to 100 g/L. Vehicle Trips - Weekday daily trip rate of 4.90 from TIA. Saturday 8.19, Sunday 5.95 from CalEEMod Default. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum reqs, water exposure 3 times per day selected. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Suburban Center, provide for EV charging stations. Mobile Commute Mitigation - Shuttle to Disneyland estimated 10% of van pool mode share. Energy Mitigation - Exceed Year 2008 Title 24 requirements by 25%. Use LED lighting 25% reduction. Water Mitigation - Install low-flow faucets, showers, and toilets. 100% turf reduction. Waste Mitigation - Institute a construction waste and debris management plan and provide recycle bins in hotel. 50% reduction. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 2 of 25 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblCommuteMitigation EmployeeVanpoolPercentModeShare 2 10 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 40.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 15.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 15,129.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 24,400.00 25,640.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 252,648.00 111,955.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.55 0.17 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.63 0.19 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.80 1.75 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2019 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,891.00 1,188.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.90 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 3 of 25 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 3.7130 43.7608 33.2216 0.0816 8.1958 1.6515 9.8473 3.8030 1.5193 5.3223 0.0000 8,006.319 6 8,006.319 6 0.6923 0.0000 8,020.857 8 2019 32.3924 20.8629 20.9588 0.0406 0.9512 1.1210 2.0723 0.2556 1.0734 1.3290 0.0000 3,600.367 2 3,600.367 2 0.5415 0.0000 3,611.7386 Total 36.1053 64.6237 54.1803 0.1222 9.1470 2.7725 11.9195 4.0586 2.5927 6.6513 0.0000 11,606.68 69 11,606.68 69 1.2338 0.0000 11,632.59 64 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 3.7130 43.7608 33.2216 0.0816 4.1293 1.6515 5.7807 1.7383 1.5193 3.2576 0.0000 8,006.319 6 8,006.319 6 0.6923 0.0000 8,020.857 8 2019 32.3924 20.8629 20.9588 0.0406 0.9512 1.1210 2.0723 0.2556 1.0734 1.3290 0.0000 3,600.367 2 3,600.367 2 0.5415 0.0000 3,611.7386 Total 36.1053 64.6237 54.1803 0.1222 5.0805 2.7725 7.8530 1.9939 2.5927 4.5866 0.0000 11,606.68 69 11,606.68 69 1.2338 0.0000 11,632.59 64 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.46 0.00 34.12 50.87 0.00 31.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 4 of 25 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Energy 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 Mobile 3.9430 9.4631 39.2193 0.1089 7.2123 0.1468 7.3591 1.9271 0.1354 2.0625 8,709.938 2 8,709.938 2 0.3120 8,716.489 3 Total 8.2220 10.5390 40.1542 0.1153 7.2123 0.2287 7.4409 1.9271 0.2172 2.1443 10,000.78 02 10,000.78 02 0.3369 0.0237 10,015.19 06 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Energy 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 Mobile 3.9430 9.4631 39.2193 0.1089 7.2123 0.1468 7.3591 1.9271 0.1354 2.0625 8,709.938 2 8,709.938 2 0.3120 8,716.489 3 Total 8.1967 10.3088 39.9609 0.1140 7.2123 0.2112 7.4234 1.9271 0.1997 2.1268 9,724.546 4 9,724.546 4 0.3316 0.0186 9,737.275 6 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 5 of 25 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2018 3/28/2018 5 20 2 Grading Grading 3/29/2018 4/18/2018 5 15 3 Building Construction Building Construction 4/19/2018 2/20/2019 5 220 4 Paving Paving 2/21/2019 3/6/2019 5 10 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/7/2019 5/1/2019 5 40 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.31 2.18 0.48 1.20 0.00 7.65 0.24 0.00 8.06 0.82 0.00 2.76 2.76 1.57 21.39 2.77 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 207,653; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,218 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 7.5 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 6 of 25 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 6.00 240.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 6.00 1,188.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 70.00 27.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 7 of 25 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.5978 0.0000 2.5978 0.3933 0.0000 0.3933 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 1.3660 1.3660 1.2780 1.2780 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Total 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 2.5978 1.3660 3.9638 0.3933 1.2780 1.6714 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1913 2.8294 2.1868 8.8400e- 003 0.2091 0.0470 0.2561 0.0573 0.0432 0.1005 863.6574 863.6574 6.3500e- 003 863.7909 Vendor 0.0431 0.4357 0.5363 1.3000e- 003 0.0375 7.1200e- 003 0.0446 0.0107 6.5500e- 003 0.0172 126.6404 126.6404 9.0000e- 004 126.6594 Worker 0.0439 0.0555 0.6934 1.8400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.1934 143.1934 6.7900e- 003 143.3360 Total 0.2782 3.3205 3.4164 0.0120 0.3919 0.0553 0.4472 0.1065 0.0508 0.1573 1,133.491 2 1,133.491 2 0.0140 1,133.786 3 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 8 of 25 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.0132 0.0000 1.0132 0.1534 0.0000 0.1534 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 1.3660 1.3660 1.2780 1.2780 0.0000 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Total 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 1.0132 1.3660 2.3791 0.1534 1.2780 1.4314 0.0000 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.1913 2.8294 2.1868 8.8400e- 003 0.2091 0.0470 0.2561 0.0573 0.0432 0.1005 863.6574 863.6574 6.3500e- 003 863.7909 Vendor 0.0431 0.4357 0.5363 1.3000e- 003 0.0375 7.1200e- 003 0.0446 0.0107 6.5500e- 003 0.0172 126.6404 126.6404 9.0000e- 004 126.6594 Worker 0.0439 0.0555 0.6934 1.8400e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 143.1934 143.1934 6.7900e- 003 143.3360 Total 0.2782 3.3205 3.4164 0.0120 0.3919 0.0553 0.4472 0.1065 0.0508 0.1573 1,133.491 2 1,133.491 2 0.0140 1,133.786 3 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 9 of 25 3.3 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.6664 0.0000 6.6664 3.3848 0.0000 3.3848 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 1.3333 1.3333 1.2266 1.2266 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Total 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 6.6664 1.3333 7.9997 3.3848 1.2266 4.6114 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.2624 18.6737 14.4326 0.0584 1.3801 0.3102 1.6903 0.3779 0.2854 0.6633 5,700.139 0 5,700.139 0 0.0419 5,701.019 7 Vendor 0.0431 0.4357 0.5363 1.3000e- 003 0.0375 7.1200e- 003 0.0446 0.0107 6.5500e- 003 0.0172 126.6404 126.6404 9.0000e- 004 126.6594 Worker 0.0337 0.0427 0.5334 1.4200e- 003 0.1118 8.8000e- 004 0.1127 0.0296 8.1000e- 004 0.0305 110.1488 110.1488 5.2200e- 003 110.2585 Total 1.3393 19.1521 15.5023 0.0611 1.5294 0.3182 1.8476 0.4183 0.2927 0.7110 5,936.928 2 5,936.928 2 0.0481 5,937.937 6 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 10 of 25 3.3 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.5999 0.0000 2.5999 1.3201 0.0000 1.3201 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 1.3333 1.3333 1.2266 1.2266 0.0000 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Total 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 2.5999 1.3333 3.9332 1.3201 1.2266 2.5467 0.0000 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.2624 18.6737 14.4326 0.0584 1.3801 0.3102 1.6903 0.3779 0.2854 0.6633 5,700.139 0 5,700.139 0 0.0419 5,701.019 7 Vendor 0.0431 0.4357 0.5363 1.3000e- 003 0.0375 7.1200e- 003 0.0446 0.0107 6.5500e- 003 0.0172 126.6404 126.6404 9.0000e- 004 126.6594 Worker 0.0337 0.0427 0.5334 1.4200e- 003 0.1118 8.8000e- 004 0.1127 0.0296 8.1000e- 004 0.0305 110.1488 110.1488 5.2200e- 003 110.2585 Total 1.3393 19.1521 15.5023 0.0611 1.5294 0.3182 1.8476 0.4183 0.2927 0.7110 5,936.928 2 5,936.928 2 0.0481 5,937.937 6 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 11 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1939 1.9606 2.4132 5.8600e- 003 0.1688 0.0320 0.2008 0.0481 0.0295 0.0775 569.8819 569.8819 4.0600e- 003 569.9673 Worker 0.2362 0.2986 3.7337 9.9100e- 003 0.7824 6.1300e- 003 0.7886 0.2075 5.6700e- 003 0.2132 771.0413 771.0413 0.0366 771.8092 Total 0.4301 2.2592 6.1468 0.0158 0.9512 0.0382 0.9894 0.2556 0.0351 0.2907 1,340.923 2 1,340.923 2 0.0406 1,341.776 4 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 12 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 0.0000 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 0.0000 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1939 1.9606 2.4132 5.8600e- 003 0.1688 0.0320 0.2008 0.0481 0.0295 0.0775 569.8819 569.8819 4.0600e- 003 569.9673 Worker 0.2362 0.2986 3.7337 9.9100e- 003 0.7824 6.1300e- 003 0.7886 0.2075 5.6700e- 003 0.2132 771.0413 771.0413 0.0366 771.8092 Total 0.4301 2.2592 6.1468 0.0158 0.9512 0.0382 0.9894 0.2556 0.0351 0.2907 1,340.923 2 1,340.923 2 0.0406 1,341.776 4 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 13 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1837 1.8088 2.3225 5.8400e- 003 0.1688 0.0304 0.1992 0.0481 0.0280 0.0760 558.7773 558.7773 3.9800e- 003 558.8610 Worker 0.2174 0.2739 3.4314 9.8900e- 003 0.7824 6.0200e- 003 0.7885 0.2075 5.5800e- 003 0.2131 741.8084 741.8084 0.0342 742.5272 Total 0.4011 2.0826 5.7539 0.0157 0.9512 0.0364 0.9877 0.2556 0.0335 0.2891 1,300.585 7 1,300.585 7 0.0382 1,301.388 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 14 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 0.0000 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 0.0000 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1837 1.8088 2.3225 5.8400e- 003 0.1688 0.0304 0.1992 0.0481 0.0280 0.0760 558.7773 558.7773 3.9800e- 003 558.8610 Worker 0.2174 0.2739 3.4314 9.8900e- 003 0.7824 6.0200e- 003 0.7885 0.2075 5.5800e- 003 0.2131 741.8084 741.8084 0.0342 742.5272 Total 0.4011 2.0826 5.7539 0.0157 0.9512 0.0364 0.9877 0.2556 0.0335 0.2891 1,300.585 7 1,300.585 7 0.0382 1,301.388 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 15 of 25 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Paving 0.0498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2808 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0466 0.0587 0.7353 2.1200e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 158.9589 158.9589 7.3300e- 003 159.1130 Total 0.0466 0.0587 0.7353 2.1200e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 158.9589 158.9589 7.3300e- 003 159.1130 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 16 of 25 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 0.0000 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Paving 0.0498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2808 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 0.0000 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0466 0.0587 0.7353 2.1200e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 158.9589 158.9589 7.3300e- 003 159.1130 Total 0.0466 0.0587 0.7353 2.1200e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 158.9589 158.9589 7.3300e- 003 159.1130 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 17 of 25 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.0824 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Total 32.3489 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0435 0.0548 0.6863 1.9800e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 148.3617 148.3617 6.8500e- 003 148.5054 Total 0.0435 0.0548 0.6863 1.9800e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 148.3617 148.3617 6.8500e- 003 148.5054 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 18 of 25 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.0824 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Total 32.3489 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0435 0.0548 0.6863 1.9800e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 148.3617 148.3617 6.8500e- 003 148.5054 Total 0.0435 0.0548 0.6863 1.9800e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 148.3617 148.3617 6.8500e- 003 148.5054 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 19 of 25 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 3.9430 9.4631 39.2193 0.1089 7.2123 0.1468 7.3591 1.9271 0.1354 2.0625 8,709.938 2 8,709.938 2 0.3120 8,716.489 3 Unmitigated 3.9430 9.4631 39.2193 0.1089 7.2123 0.1468 7.3591 1.9271 0.1354 2.0625 8,709.938 2 8,709.938 2 0.3120 8,716.489 3 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 852.60 1,425.06 1035.30 2,291,870 2,291,870 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 852.60 1,425.06 1,035.30 2,291,870 2,291,870 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Implement NEV Network Employee Vanpool/Shuttle CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 20 of 25 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Install High Efficiency Lighting 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.511108 0.059746 0.180859 0.139188 0.042462 0.006666 0.016153 0.032295 0.001940 0.002496 0.004377 0.000582 0.002128 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 21 of 25 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 10971.6 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 Total 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 8.6236 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 22 of 25 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Unmitigated 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.8790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 3.2788 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.9800e- 003 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Total 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 23 of 25 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Turf Reduction 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.8790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 3.2788 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.9800e- 003 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Total 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 24 of 25 10.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:30 AMPage 25 of 25 South Coast Air Basin, Winter Anaheim Element Hotel 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 61.00 Space 0.17 25,640.00 0 Parking Lot 70.00 Space 0.19 28,000.00 0 Hotel 174.00 Room 1.75 111,955.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 1 of 25 Project Characteristics - Land Use - 174-room Hotel on 1.75 acres/111,955 sqft. 61-space Enclosed parking w/ elevator on 0.17 acres/25,640 sqft. 70-space Parking Lot on 0.19 acres. Construction Phase - 20 days Demo, 15 days Grading, 220 days Construction, 10 days Paving, 40 painting. Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips added to demo and grading to account for water trucks. Demolition - 30,720 sf building x 0.046 tons per sf + 42,000 sf of pavement x 145 lb per sf = 2,428 tons. Grading - 15,129 CY exported for excavation of basement. Architectural Coating - VOC set to 100 g/L. Vehicle Trips - Weekday daily trip rate of 4.90 from TIA. Saturday 8.19, Sunday 5.95 from CalEEMod Default. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum reqs, water exposure 3 times per day selected. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Suburban Center, provide for EV charging stations. Mobile Commute Mitigation - Shuttle to Disneyland estimated 10% of van pool mode share. Energy Mitigation - Exceed Year 2008 Title 24 requirements by 25%. Use LED lighting 25% reduction. Water Mitigation - Install low-flow faucets, showers, and toilets. 100% turf reduction. Waste Mitigation - Institute a construction waste and debris management plan and provide recycle bins in hotel. 50% reduction. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 2 of 25 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblCommuteMitigation EmployeeVanpoolPercentModeShare 2 10 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 40.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 15.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 15,129.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 24,400.00 25,640.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 252,648.00 111,955.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.55 0.17 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.63 0.19 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.80 1.75 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2019 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,891.00 1,188.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.90 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 3 of 25 2.1 Overall Construction (Maximum Daily Emission) ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 3.7781 44.4490 35.5680 0.0814 8.1958 1.6522 9.8480 3.8030 1.5200 5.3230 0.0000 7,984.828 1 7,984.828 1 0.6929 0.0000 7,999.379 3 2019 32.3931 20.9322 21.1836 0.0399 0.9512 1.1213 2.0726 0.2556 1.0736 1.3292 0.0000 3,549.260 1 3,549.260 1 0.5415 0.0000 3,560.631 4 Total 36.1712 65.3812 56.7515 0.1213 9.1470 2.7735 11.9205 4.0586 2.5936 6.6522 0.0000 11,534.08 82 11,534.08 82 1.2344 0.0000 11,560.01 07 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year lb/day lb/day 2018 3.7781 44.4490 35.5680 0.0814 4.1293 1.6522 5.7815 1.7383 1.5200 3.2583 0.0000 7,984.828 1 7,984.828 1 0.6929 0.0000 7,999.379 3 2019 32.3931 20.9322 21.1836 0.0399 0.9512 1.1213 2.0726 0.2556 1.0736 1.3292 0.0000 3,549.260 1 3,549.260 1 0.5415 0.0000 3,560.631 4 Total 36.1712 65.3812 56.7515 0.1213 5.0805 2.7735 7.8540 1.9939 2.5936 4.5875 0.0000 11,534.08 82 11,534.08 82 1.2344 0.0000 11,560.01 07 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 44.46 0.00 34.11 50.87 0.00 31.04 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 4 of 25 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Energy 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 Mobile 4.0850 9.9185 39.5867 0.1034 7.2123 0.1475 7.3598 1.9271 0.1360 2.0631 8,293.988 2 8,293.988 2 0.3124 8,300.548 1 Total 8.3641 10.9944 40.5216 0.1099 7.2123 0.2294 7.4416 1.9271 0.2179 2.1450 9,584.830 2 9,584.830 2 0.3373 0.0237 9,599.249 4 Unmitigated Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Area 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Energy 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 Mobile 4.0850 9.9185 39.5867 0.1034 7.2123 0.1475 7.3598 1.9271 0.1360 2.0631 8,293.988 2 8,293.988 2 0.3124 8,300.548 1 Total 8.3387 10.7642 40.3283 0.1085 7.2123 0.2119 7.4241 1.9271 0.2004 2.1275 9,308.596 4 9,308.596 4 0.3320 0.0186 9,321.334 4 Mitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 5 of 25 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2018 3/28/2018 5 20 2 Grading Grading 3/29/2018 4/18/2018 5 15 3 Building Construction Building Construction 4/19/2018 2/20/2019 5 220 4 Paving Paving 2/21/2019 3/6/2019 5 10 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/7/2019 5/1/2019 5 40 OffRoad Equipment ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.30 2.09 0.48 1.26 0.00 7.63 0.24 0.00 8.03 0.82 0.00 2.88 2.88 1.57 21.39 2.90 Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 207,653; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,218 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 7.5 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 6 of 25 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 6.00 240.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 6.00 1,188.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 70.00 27.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 7 of 25 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.5978 0.0000 2.5978 0.3933 0.0000 0.3933 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 1.3660 1.3660 1.2780 1.2780 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Total 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 2.5978 1.3660 3.9638 0.3933 1.2780 1.6714 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2005 2.9314 2.5313 8.8200e- 003 0.2091 0.0471 0.2562 0.0573 0.0433 0.1006 861.6036 861.6036 6.4400e- 003 861.7389 Vendor 0.0469 0.4462 0.6544 1.2900e- 003 0.0375 7.1800e- 003 0.0447 0.0107 6.6100e- 003 0.0173 125.5743 125.5743 9.3000e- 004 125.5939 Worker 0.0446 0.0609 0.6344 1.7200e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 134.2621 134.2621 6.7900e- 003 134.4047 Total 0.2920 3.4385 3.8200 0.0118 0.3919 0.0554 0.4474 0.1065 0.0510 0.1575 1,121.440 0 1,121.440 0 0.0142 1,121.737 5 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 8 of 25 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 1.0132 0.0000 1.0132 0.1534 0.0000 0.1534 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 1.3660 1.3660 1.2780 1.2780 0.0000 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Total 2.3936 23.5008 19.6968 0.0245 1.0132 1.3660 2.3791 0.1534 1.2780 1.4314 0.0000 2,427.215 6 2,427.215 6 0.6170 2,440.172 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.2005 2.9314 2.5313 8.8200e- 003 0.2091 0.0471 0.2562 0.0573 0.0433 0.1006 861.6036 861.6036 6.4400e- 003 861.7389 Vendor 0.0469 0.4462 0.6544 1.2900e- 003 0.0375 7.1800e- 003 0.0447 0.0107 6.6100e- 003 0.0173 125.5743 125.5743 9.3000e- 004 125.5939 Worker 0.0446 0.0609 0.6344 1.7200e- 003 0.1453 1.1400e- 003 0.1465 0.0385 1.0500e- 003 0.0396 134.2621 134.2621 6.7900e- 003 134.4047 Total 0.2920 3.4385 3.8200 0.0118 0.3919 0.0554 0.4474 0.1065 0.0510 0.1575 1,121.440 0 1,121.440 0 0.0142 1,121.737 5 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 9 of 25 3.3 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 6.6664 0.0000 6.6664 3.3848 0.0000 3.3848 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 1.3333 1.3333 1.2266 1.2266 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Total 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 6.6664 1.3333 7.9997 3.3848 1.2266 4.6114 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.3232 19.3472 16.7063 0.0582 1.3801 0.3109 1.6910 0.3779 0.2860 0.6639 5,686.583 8 5,686.583 8 0.0425 5,687.476 9 Vendor 0.0469 0.4462 0.6544 1.2900e- 003 0.0375 7.1800e- 003 0.0447 0.0107 6.6100e- 003 0.0173 125.5743 125.5743 9.3000e- 004 125.5939 Worker 0.0343 0.0468 0.4880 1.3300e- 003 0.1118 8.8000e- 004 0.1127 0.0296 8.1000e- 004 0.0305 103.2785 103.2785 5.2200e- 003 103.3882 Total 1.4044 19.8402 17.8487 0.0609 1.5294 0.3189 1.8483 0.4183 0.2934 0.7117 5,915.436 7 5,915.436 7 0.0487 5,916.459 0 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 10 of 25 3.3 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Fugitive Dust 2.5999 0.0000 2.5999 1.3201 0.0000 1.3201 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 1.3333 1.3333 1.2266 1.2266 0.0000 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Total 2.3737 24.6088 17.7193 0.0205 2.5999 1.3333 3.9332 1.3201 1.2266 2.5467 0.0000 2,069.391 4 2,069.391 4 0.6442 2,082.920 2 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 1.3232 19.3472 16.7063 0.0582 1.3801 0.3109 1.6910 0.3779 0.2860 0.6639 5,686.583 8 5,686.583 8 0.0425 5,687.476 9 Vendor 0.0469 0.4462 0.6544 1.2900e- 003 0.0375 7.1800e- 003 0.0447 0.0107 6.6100e- 003 0.0173 125.5743 125.5743 9.3000e- 004 125.5939 Worker 0.0343 0.0468 0.4880 1.3300e- 003 0.1118 8.8000e- 004 0.1127 0.0296 8.1000e- 004 0.0305 103.2785 103.2785 5.2200e- 003 103.3882 Total 1.4044 19.8402 17.8487 0.0609 1.5294 0.3189 1.8483 0.4183 0.2934 0.7117 5,915.436 7 5,915.436 7 0.0487 5,916.459 0 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 11 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2111 2.0080 2.9448 5.8200e- 003 0.1688 0.0323 0.2011 0.0481 0.0297 0.0778 565.0845 565.0845 4.1900e- 003 565.1726 Worker 0.2403 0.3278 3.4160 9.2800e- 003 0.7824 6.1300e- 003 0.7886 0.2075 5.6700e- 003 0.2132 722.9496 722.9496 0.0366 723.7175 Total 0.4514 2.3358 6.3608 0.0151 0.9512 0.0385 0.9897 0.2556 0.0354 0.2910 1,288.034 1 1,288.034 1 0.0408 1,288.890 1 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 12 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 0.0000 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Total 2.9004 20.5600 15.6637 0.0249 1.2511 1.2511 1.1992 1.1992 0.0000 2,317.208 9 2,317.208 9 0.4980 2,327.666 4 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.2111 2.0080 2.9448 5.8200e- 003 0.1688 0.0323 0.2011 0.0481 0.0297 0.0778 565.0845 565.0845 4.1900e- 003 565.1726 Worker 0.2403 0.3278 3.4160 9.2800e- 003 0.7824 6.1300e- 003 0.7886 0.2075 5.6700e- 003 0.2132 722.9496 722.9496 0.0366 723.7175 Total 0.4514 2.3358 6.3608 0.0151 0.9512 0.0385 0.9897 0.2556 0.0354 0.2910 1,288.034 1 1,288.034 1 0.0408 1,288.890 1 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 13 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1996 1.8514 2.8480 5.8000e- 003 0.1688 0.0307 0.1995 0.0481 0.0282 0.0763 554.0517 554.0517 4.1200e- 003 554.1382 Worker 0.2210 0.3006 3.1307 9.2600e- 003 0.7824 6.0200e- 003 0.7885 0.2075 5.5800e- 003 0.2131 695.4268 695.4268 0.0342 696.1456 Total 0.4206 2.1520 5.9787 0.0151 0.9512 0.0367 0.9879 0.2556 0.0338 0.2894 1,249.478 5 1,249.478 5 0.0384 1,250.283 8 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 14 of 25 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 0.0000 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Total 2.5471 18.7802 15.2049 0.0249 1.0846 1.0846 1.0399 1.0399 0.0000 2,299.781 6 2,299.781 6 0.4771 2,309.800 5 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.1996 1.8514 2.8480 5.8000e- 003 0.1688 0.0307 0.1995 0.0481 0.0282 0.0763 554.0517 554.0517 4.1200e- 003 554.1382 Worker 0.2210 0.3006 3.1307 9.2600e- 003 0.7824 6.0200e- 003 0.7885 0.2075 5.5800e- 003 0.2131 695.4268 695.4268 0.0342 696.1456 Total 0.4206 2.1520 5.9787 0.0151 0.9512 0.0367 0.9879 0.2556 0.0338 0.2894 1,249.478 5 1,249.478 5 0.0384 1,250.283 8 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 15 of 25 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Paving 0.0498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2808 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0474 0.0644 0.6709 1.9800e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 149.0200 149.0200 7.3300e- 003 149.1741 Total 0.0474 0.0644 0.6709 1.9800e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 149.0200 149.0200 7.3300e- 003 149.1741 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 16 of 25 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Off-Road 1.2310 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 0.0000 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Paving 0.0498 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 1.2808 12.4141 11.7009 0.0176 0.7225 0.7225 0.6658 0.6658 0.0000 1,722.228 5 1,722.228 5 0.5342 1,733.445 8 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0474 0.0644 0.6709 1.9800e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 149.0200 149.0200 7.3300e- 003 149.1741 Total 0.0474 0.0644 0.6709 1.9800e- 003 0.1677 1.2900e- 003 0.1690 0.0445 1.2000e- 003 0.0457 149.0200 149.0200 7.3300e- 003 149.1741 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 17 of 25 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.0824 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Total 32.3489 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0442 0.0601 0.6261 1.8500e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 139.0854 139.0854 6.8500e- 003 139.2291 Total 0.0442 0.0601 0.6261 1.8500e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 139.0854 139.0854 6.8500e- 003 139.2291 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 18 of 25 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Archit. Coating 32.0824 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.2664 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Total 32.3489 1.8354 1.8413 2.9700e- 003 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.1288 0.0000 281.4481 281.4481 0.0238 281.9473 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 0.0442 0.0601 0.6261 1.8500e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 139.0854 139.0854 6.8500e- 003 139.2291 Total 0.0442 0.0601 0.6261 1.8500e- 003 0.1565 1.2000e- 003 0.1577 0.0415 1.1200e- 003 0.0426 139.0854 139.0854 6.8500e- 003 139.2291 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 19 of 25 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 4.0850 9.9185 39.5867 0.1034 7.2123 0.1475 7.3598 1.9271 0.1360 2.0631 8,293.988 2 8,293.988 2 0.3124 8,300.548 1 Unmitigated 4.0850 9.9185 39.5867 0.1034 7.2123 0.1475 7.3598 1.9271 0.1360 2.0631 8,293.988 2 8,293.988 2 0.3124 8,300.548 1 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 852.60 1,425.06 1035.30 2,291,870 2,291,870 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 852.60 1,425.06 1,035.30 2,291,870 2,291,870 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Implement NEV Network Employee Vanpool/Shuttle CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 20 of 25 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Install High Efficiency Lighting 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.511108 0.059746 0.180859 0.139188 0.042462 0.006666 0.016153 0.032295 0.001940 0.002496 0.004377 0.000582 0.002128 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 21 of 25 6.0 Area Detail 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 10971.6 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 Total 0.1183 1.0757 0.9035 6.4500e- 003 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 0.0818 1,290.775 3 1,290.775 3 0.0247 0.0237 1,298.630 7 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr lb/day lb/day Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 8.6236 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 Total 0.0930 0.8455 0.7102 5.0700e- 003 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 0.0643 1,014.541 4 1,014.541 4 0.0195 0.0186 1,020.715 8 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 22 of 25 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category lb/day lb/day Mitigated 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Unmitigated 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.8790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 3.2788 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.9800e- 003 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Total 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 23 of 25 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Turf Reduction 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 8.0 Waste Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory lb/day lb/day Architectural Coating 0.8790 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 3.2788 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 2.9800e- 003 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Total 4.1607 2.9000e- 004 0.0314 0.0000 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 0.0668 0.0668 1.8000e- 004 0.0706 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 24 of 25 10.0 Vegetation Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:31 AMPage 25 of 25 South Coast Air Basin, Annual Anaheim Element Hotel 1.1 Land Usage Land Uses Size Metric Lot Acreage Floor Surface Area Population Enclosed Parking with Elevator 61.00 Space 0.17 25,640.00 0 Parking Lot 70.00 Space 0.19 28,000.00 0 Hotel 174.00 Room 1.75 111,955.00 0 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Urbanization Climate Zone Urban 8 Wind Speed (m/s)Precipitation Freq (Days)2.2 31 1.3 User Entered Comments & Non-Default Data 1.0 Project Characteristics Utility Company Southern California Edison 2019Operational Year CO2 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 630.89 0.029CH4 Intensity (lb/MWhr) 0.006N2O Intensity (lb/MWhr) CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 1 of 30 Project Characteristics - Land Use - 174-room Hotel on 1.75 acres/111,955 sqft. 61-space Enclosed parking w/ elevator on 0.17 acres/25,640 sqft. 70-space Parking Lot on 0.19 acres. Construction Phase - 20 days Demo, 15 days Grading, 220 days Construction, 10 days Paving, 40 painting. Trips and VMT - 6 vendor trips added to demo and grading to account for water trucks. Demolition - 30,720 sf building x 0.046 tons per sf + 42,000 sf of pavement x 145 lb per sf = 2,428 tons. Grading - 15,129 CY exported for excavation of basement. Architectural Coating - VOC set to 100 g/L. Vehicle Trips - Weekday daily trip rate of 4.90 from TIA. Saturday 8.19, Sunday 5.95 from CalEEMod Default. Construction Off-road Equipment Mitigation - Per SCAQMD Rule 403 minimum reqs, water exposure 3 times per day selected. Mobile Land Use Mitigation - Suburban Center, provide for EV charging stations. Mobile Commute Mitigation - Shuttle to Disneyland estimated 10% of van pool mode share. Energy Mitigation - Exceed Year 2008 Title 24 requirements by 25%. Use LED lighting 25% reduction. Water Mitigation - Install low-flow faucets, showers, and toilets. 100% turf reduction. Waste Mitigation - Institute a construction waste and debris management plan and provide recycle bins in hotel. 50% reduction. CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 2 of 30 2.0 Emissions Summary Table Name Column Name Default Value New Value tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Exterior 250.00 100.00 tblArchitecturalCoating EF_Nonresidential_Interior 250.00 100.00 tblCommuteMitigation EmployeeVanpoolPercentModeShare 2 10 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 10.00 40.00 tblConstructionPhase NumDays 6.00 15.00 tblGrading MaterialExported 0.00 15,129.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 24,400.00 25,640.00 tblLandUse LandUseSquareFeet 252,648.00 111,955.00 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.55 0.17 tblLandUse LotAcreage 0.63 0.19 tblLandUse LotAcreage 5.80 1.75 tblProjectCharacteristics OperationalYear 2014 2019 tblTripsAndVMT HaulingTripNumber 1,891.00 1,188.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblTripsAndVMT VendorTripNumber 0.00 6.00 tblVehicleTrips WD_TR 8.17 4.90 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 3 of 30 2.1 Overall Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.3598 2.7054 2.5141 4.6500e- 003 0.1766 0.1446 0.3212 0.0565 0.1376 0.1941 0.0000 387.0538 387.0538 0.0552 0.0000 388.2119 2019 0.7090 0.4884 0.5034 9.4000e- 004 0.0212 0.0270 0.0481 5.6900e- 003 0.0258 0.0315 0.0000 75.9630 75.9630 0.0117 0.0000 76.2078 Total 1.0688 3.1938 3.0175 5.5900e- 003 0.1978 0.1715 0.3693 0.0622 0.1634 0.2256 0.0000 463.0168 463.0168 0.0668 0.0000 464.4198 Unmitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Year tons/yr MT/yr 2018 0.3598 2.7054 2.5141 4.6500e- 003 0.1302 0.1446 0.2748 0.0386 0.1376 0.1762 0.0000 387.0535 387.0535 0.0552 0.0000 388.2117 2019 0.7090 0.4884 0.5034 9.4000e- 004 0.0212 0.0270 0.0481 5.6900e- 003 0.0258 0.0315 0.0000 75.9629 75.9629 0.0117 0.0000 76.2078 Total 1.0688 3.1938 3.0175 5.5900e- 003 0.1514 0.1715 0.3230 0.0443 0.1634 0.2077 0.0000 463.0164 463.0164 0.0668 0.0000 464.4195 Mitigated Construction ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 23.44 0.00 12.55 28.77 0.00 7.93 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 4 of 30 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.7592 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 Energy 0.0216 0.1963 0.1649 1.1800e- 003 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0000 593.4686 593.4686 0.0216 7.5300e- 003 596.2553 Mobile 0.4738 1.2401 4.8813 0.0128 0.8686 0.0180 0.8866 0.2324 0.0166 0.2491 0.0000 933.1417 933.1417 0.0347 0.0000 933.8702 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 19.3390 0.0000 19.3390 1.1429 0.0000 43.3398 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.4003 18.0059 19.4062 0.1447 3.5700e- 003 23.5497 Total 1.2546 1.4365 5.0501 0.0140 0.8686 0.0330 0.9016 0.2324 0.0316 0.2640 20.7393 1,544.623 7 1,565.362 9 1.3438 0.0111 1,597.023 1 Unmitigated Operational CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 5 of 30 2.2 Overall Operational ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Area 0.7592 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 Energy 0.0170 0.1543 0.1296 9.3000e- 004 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 479.0925 479.0925 0.0175 6.0400e- 003 481.3324 Mobile 0.4738 1.2401 4.8813 0.0128 0.8686 0.0180 0.8866 0.2324 0.0166 0.2491 0.0000 933.1417 933.1417 0.0347 0.0000 933.8702 Waste 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 9.6695 0.0000 9.6695 0.5715 0.0000 21.6699 Water 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 1.1202 14.7166 15.8368 0.1157 2.8500e- 003 19.1511 Total 1.2500 1.3945 5.0148 0.0138 0.8686 0.0298 0.8984 0.2324 0.0284 0.2608 10.7897 1,426.958 3 1,437.748 0 0.7394 8.8900e- 003 1,456.031 6 Mitigated Operational 3.0 Construction Detail Construction Phase ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio-CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N20 CO2e Percent Reduction 0.37 2.93 0.70 1.78 0.00 9.68 0.35 0.00 10.11 1.21 47.97 7.62 8.15 44.98 19.91 8.83 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 6 of 30 Phase Number Phase Name Phase Type Start Date End Date Num Days Week Num Days Phase Description 1 Demolition Demolition 3/1/2018 3/28/2018 5 20 2 Grading Grading 3/29/2018 4/18/2018 5 15 3 Building Construction Building Construction 4/19/2018 2/20/2019 5 220 4 Paving Paving 2/21/2019 3/6/2019 5 10 5 Architectural Coating Architectural Coating 3/7/2019 5/1/2019 5 40 OffRoad Equipment Residential Indoor: 0; Residential Outdoor: 0; Non-Residential Indoor: 207,653; Non-Residential Outdoor: 69,218 (Architectural Coating ±sqft) Acres of Grading (Site Preparation Phase): 0 Acres of Grading (Grading Phase): 7.5 Acres of Paving: 0 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 7 of 30 Phase Name Offroad Equipment Type Amount Usage Hours Horse Power Load Factor Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saws 1 8.00 81 0.73 Demolition Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Demolition Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 3 8.00 97 0.37 Grading Graders 1 8.00 174 0.41 Grading Rubber Tired Dozers 1 8.00 255 0.40 Grading Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 2 7.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Cranes 1 8.00 226 0.29 Building Construction Forklifts 2 7.00 89 0.20 Building Construction Generator Sets 1 8.00 84 0.74 Building Construction Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 6.00 97 0.37 Building Construction Welders 3 8.00 46 0.45 Paving Cement and Mortar Mixers 1 8.00 9 0.56 Paving Pavers 1 8.00 125 0.42 Paving Paving Equipment 1 8.00 130 0.36 Paving Rollers 2 8.00 80 0.38 Paving Tractors/Loaders/Backhoes 1 8.00 97 0.37 Architectural Coating Air Compressors 1 6.00 78 0.48 Trips and VMT Phase Name Offroad Equipment Count Worker Trip Number Vendor Trip Number Hauling Trip Number Worker Trip Length Vendor Trip Length Hauling Trip Length Worker Vehicle Class Vendor Vehicle Class Hauling Vehicle Class Demolition 5 13.00 6.00 240.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Grading 4 10.00 6.00 1,188.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Building Construction 8 70.00 27.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Paving 6 15.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT Architectural Coating 1 14.00 0.00 0.00 14.70 6.90 20.00 LD_Mix HDT_Mix HHDT CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 8 of 30 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0260 0.0000 0.0260 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0239 0.2350 0.1970 2.4000e- 004 0.0137 0.0137 0.0128 0.0128 0.0000 22.0193 22.0193 5.6000e- 003 0.0000 22.1369 Total 0.0239 0.2350 0.1970 2.4000e- 004 0.0260 0.0137 0.0396 3.9300e- 003 0.0128 0.0167 0.0000 22.0193 22.0193 5.6000e- 003 0.0000 22.1369 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.9800e- 003 0.0298 0.0248 9.0000e- 005 2.0600e- 003 4.7000e- 004 2.5300e- 003 5.6000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 003 0.0000 7.8271 7.8271 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.8284 Vendor 4.6000e- 004 4.5500e- 003 6.3500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.1448 1.1448 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.1450 Worker 4.2000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 6.5100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2370 1.2370 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2383 Total 2.8600e- 003 0.0350 0.0377 1.2000e- 004 3.8600e- 003 5.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 1.0500e- 003 5.1000e- 004 1.5600e- 003 0.0000 10.2090 10.2090 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 10.2116 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site 3.1 Mitigation Measures Construction Water Exposed Area CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 9 of 30 3.2 Demolition - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0101 0.0000 0.0101 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 1.5300e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0239 0.2350 0.1970 2.4000e- 004 0.0137 0.0137 0.0128 0.0128 0.0000 22.0193 22.0193 5.6000e- 003 0.0000 22.1369 Total 0.0239 0.2350 0.1970 2.4000e- 004 0.0101 0.0137 0.0238 1.5300e- 003 0.0128 0.0143 0.0000 22.0193 22.0193 5.6000e- 003 0.0000 22.1369 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 1.9800e- 003 0.0298 0.0248 9.0000e- 005 2.0600e- 003 4.7000e- 004 2.5300e- 003 5.6000e- 004 4.3000e- 004 1.0000e- 003 0.0000 7.8271 7.8271 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.8284 Vendor 4.6000e- 004 4.5500e- 003 6.3500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 3.7000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 4.4000e- 004 1.1000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 1.7000e- 004 0.0000 1.1448 1.1448 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.1450 Worker 4.2000e- 004 6.3000e- 004 6.5100e- 003 2.0000e- 005 1.4300e- 003 1.0000e- 005 1.4400e- 003 3.8000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 3.9000e- 004 0.0000 1.2370 1.2370 6.0000e- 005 0.0000 1.2383 Total 2.8600e- 003 0.0350 0.0377 1.2000e- 004 3.8600e- 003 5.5000e- 004 4.4100e- 003 1.0500e- 003 5.1000e- 004 1.5600e- 003 0.0000 10.2090 10.2090 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 10.2116 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 10 of 30 3.3 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0500 0.0000 0.0500 0.0254 0.0000 0.0254 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0178 0.1846 0.1329 1.5000e- 004 0.0100 0.0100 9.2000e- 003 9.2000e- 003 0.0000 14.0799 14.0799 4.3800e- 003 0.0000 14.1720 Total 0.0178 0.1846 0.1329 1.5000e- 004 0.0500 0.0100 0.0600 0.0254 9.2000e- 003 0.0346 0.0000 14.0799 14.0799 4.3800e- 003 0.0000 14.1720 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 9.7900e- 003 0.1476 0.1229 4.4000e- 004 0.0102 2.3300e- 003 0.0125 2.7900e- 003 2.1400e- 003 4.9400e- 003 0.0000 38.7444 38.7444 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 38.7504 Vendor 3.4000e- 004 3.4100e- 003 4.7600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.8000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.8586 0.8586 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8587 Worker 2.4000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.7137 0.7137 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7144 Total 0.0104 0.1514 0.1314 4.6000e- 004 0.0113 2.3900e- 003 0.0137 3.0900e- 003 2.2000e- 003 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 40.3166 40.3166 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 40.3235 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 11 of 30 3.3 Grading - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Fugitive Dust 0.0195 0.0000 0.0195 9.9000e- 003 0.0000 9.9000e- 003 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 0.0178 0.1846 0.1329 1.5000e- 004 0.0100 0.0100 9.2000e- 003 9.2000e- 003 0.0000 14.0799 14.0799 4.3800e- 003 0.0000 14.1719 Total 0.0178 0.1846 0.1329 1.5000e- 004 0.0195 0.0100 0.0295 9.9000e- 003 9.2000e- 003 0.0191 0.0000 14.0799 14.0799 4.3800e- 003 0.0000 14.1719 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 9.7900e- 003 0.1476 0.1229 4.4000e- 004 0.0102 2.3300e- 003 0.0125 2.7900e- 003 2.1400e- 003 4.9400e- 003 0.0000 38.7444 38.7444 2.9000e- 004 0.0000 38.7504 Vendor 3.4000e- 004 3.4100e- 003 4.7600e- 003 1.0000e- 005 2.8000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 3.3000e- 004 8.0000e- 005 5.0000e- 005 1.3000e- 004 0.0000 0.8586 0.8586 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.8587 Worker 2.4000e- 004 3.6000e- 004 3.7500e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.7137 0.7137 4.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.7144 Total 0.0104 0.1514 0.1314 4.6000e- 004 0.0113 2.3900e- 003 0.0137 3.0900e- 003 2.2000e- 003 5.2900e- 003 0.0000 40.3166 40.3166 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 40.3235 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 12 of 30 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2654 1.8812 1.4332 2.2800e- 003 0.1145 0.1145 0.1097 0.1097 0.0000 192.3455 192.3455 0.0413 0.0000 193.2136 Total 0.2654 1.8812 1.4332 2.2800e- 003 0.1145 0.1145 0.1097 0.1097 0.0000 192.3455 192.3455 0.0413 0.0000 193.2136 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0188 0.1873 0.2614 5.4000e- 004 0.0152 2.9400e- 003 0.0182 4.3400e- 003 2.7100e- 003 7.0500e- 003 0.0000 47.1372 47.1372 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 47.1444 Worker 0.0207 0.0309 0.3206 8.6000e- 004 0.0703 5.6000e- 004 0.0708 0.0187 5.2000e- 004 0.0192 0.0000 60.9463 60.9463 3.0400e- 003 0.0000 61.0101 Total 0.0395 0.2182 0.5820 1.4000e- 003 0.0855 3.5000e- 003 0.0890 0.0230 3.2300e- 003 0.0262 0.0000 108.0835 108.0835 3.3800e- 003 0.0000 108.1544 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 13 of 30 3.4 Building Construction - 2018 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.2654 1.8812 1.4332 2.2800e- 003 0.1145 0.1145 0.1097 0.1097 0.0000 192.3453 192.3453 0.0413 0.0000 193.2133 Total 0.2654 1.8812 1.4332 2.2800e- 003 0.1145 0.1145 0.1097 0.1097 0.0000 192.3453 192.3453 0.0413 0.0000 193.2133 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0188 0.1873 0.2614 5.4000e- 004 0.0152 2.9400e- 003 0.0182 4.3400e- 003 2.7100e- 003 7.0500e- 003 0.0000 47.1372 47.1372 3.4000e- 004 0.0000 47.1444 Worker 0.0207 0.0309 0.3206 8.6000e- 004 0.0703 5.6000e- 004 0.0708 0.0187 5.2000e- 004 0.0192 0.0000 60.9463 60.9463 3.0400e- 003 0.0000 61.0101 Total 0.0395 0.2182 0.5820 1.4000e- 003 0.0855 3.5000e- 003 0.0890 0.0230 3.2300e- 003 0.0262 0.0000 108.0835 108.0835 3.3800e- 003 0.0000 108.1544 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 14 of 30 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0471 0.3474 0.2813 4.6000e- 004 0.0201 0.0201 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 38.5970 38.5970 8.0100e- 003 0.0000 38.7652 Total 0.0471 0.3474 0.2813 4.6000e- 004 0.0201 0.0201 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 38.5970 38.5970 8.0100e- 003 0.0000 38.7652 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.6000e- 003 0.0349 0.0511 1.1000e- 004 3.0700e- 003 5.6000e- 004 3.6400e- 003 8.8000e- 004 5.2000e- 004 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 9.3446 9.3446 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.3460 Worker 3.8400e- 003 5.7300e- 003 0.0594 1.7000e- 004 0.0142 1.1000e- 004 0.0143 3.7700e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.8800e- 003 0.0000 11.8535 11.8535 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 11.8656 Total 7.4400e- 003 0.0407 0.1105 2.8000e- 004 0.0173 6.7000e- 004 0.0180 4.6500e- 003 6.2000e- 004 5.2800e- 003 0.0000 21.1981 21.1981 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 21.2116 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 15 of 30 3.4 Building Construction - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 0.0471 0.3474 0.2813 4.6000e- 004 0.0201 0.0201 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 38.5970 38.5970 8.0100e- 003 0.0000 38.7652 Total 0.0471 0.3474 0.2813 4.6000e- 004 0.0201 0.0201 0.0192 0.0192 0.0000 38.5970 38.5970 8.0100e- 003 0.0000 38.7652 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 3.6000e- 003 0.0349 0.0511 1.1000e- 004 3.0700e- 003 5.6000e- 004 3.6400e- 003 8.8000e- 004 5.2000e- 004 1.4000e- 003 0.0000 9.3446 9.3446 7.0000e- 005 0.0000 9.3460 Worker 3.8400e- 003 5.7300e- 003 0.0594 1.7000e- 004 0.0142 1.1000e- 004 0.0143 3.7700e- 003 1.0000e- 004 3.8800e- 003 0.0000 11.8535 11.8535 5.7000e- 004 0.0000 11.8656 Total 7.4400e- 003 0.0407 0.1105 2.8000e- 004 0.0173 6.7000e- 004 0.0180 4.6500e- 003 6.2000e- 004 5.2800e- 003 0.0000 21.1981 21.1981 6.4000e- 004 0.0000 21.2116 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 16 of 30 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 6.1600e- 003 0.0621 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 3.6100e- 003 3.6100e- 003 3.3300e- 003 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 7.8119 7.8119 2.4200e- 003 0.0000 7.8628 Paving 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.4100e- 003 0.0621 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 3.6100e- 003 3.6100e- 003 3.3300e- 003 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 7.8119 7.8119 2.4200e- 003 0.0000 7.8628 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 3.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6865 0.6865 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6872 Total 2.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 3.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6865 0.6865 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6872 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 17 of 30 3.5 Paving - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Off-Road 6.1600e- 003 0.0621 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 3.6100e- 003 3.6100e- 003 3.3300e- 003 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 7.8119 7.8119 2.4200e- 003 0.0000 7.8628 Paving 2.5000e- 004 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 6.4100e- 003 0.0621 0.0585 9.0000e- 005 3.6100e- 003 3.6100e- 003 3.3300e- 003 3.3300e- 003 0.0000 7.8119 7.8119 2.4200e- 003 0.0000 7.8628 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 2.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 3.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6865 0.6865 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6872 Total 2.2000e- 004 3.3000e- 004 3.4400e- 003 1.0000e- 005 8.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 8.3000e- 004 2.2000e- 004 1.0000e- 005 2.2000e- 004 0.0000 0.6865 0.6865 3.0000e- 005 0.0000 0.6872 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 18 of 30 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.6417 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.3300e- 003 0.0367 0.0368 6.0000e- 005 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.1156 Total 0.6470 0.0367 0.0368 6.0000e- 005 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.1156 Unmitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.3000e- 004 1.2400e- 003 0.0129 4.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 003 8.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5629 2.5629 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5655 Total 8.3000e- 004 1.2400e- 003 0.0129 4.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 003 8.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5629 2.5629 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5655 Unmitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 19 of 30 4.0 Operational Detail - Mobile 3.6 Architectural Coating - 2019 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Archit. Coating 0.6417 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Off-Road 5.3300e- 003 0.0367 0.0368 6.0000e- 005 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.1156 Total 0.6470 0.0367 0.0368 6.0000e- 005 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 2.5800e- 003 0.0000 5.1065 5.1065 4.3000e- 004 0.0000 5.1156 Mitigated Construction On-Site ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Hauling 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Vendor 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Worker 8.3000e- 004 1.2400e- 003 0.0129 4.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 003 8.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5629 2.5629 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5655 Total 8.3000e- 004 1.2400e- 003 0.0129 4.0000e- 005 3.0700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 3.1000e- 003 8.2000e- 004 2.0000e- 005 8.4000e- 004 0.0000 2.5629 2.5629 1.2000e- 004 0.0000 2.5655 Mitigated Construction Off-Site CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 20 of 30 ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.4738 1.2401 4.8813 0.0128 0.8686 0.0180 0.8866 0.2324 0.0166 0.2491 0.0000 933.1417 933.1417 0.0347 0.0000 933.8702 Unmitigated 0.4738 1.2401 4.8813 0.0128 0.8686 0.0180 0.8866 0.2324 0.0166 0.2491 0.0000 933.1417 933.1417 0.0347 0.0000 933.8702 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile 4.2 Trip Summary Information 4.3 Trip Type Information Average Daily Trip Rate Unmitigated Mitigated Land Use Weekday Saturday Sunday Annual VMT Annual VMT Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0.00 0.00 0.00 Hotel 852.60 1,425.06 1035.30 2,291,870 2,291,870 Parking Lot 0.00 0.00 0.00 Total 852.60 1,425.06 1,035.30 2,291,870 2,291,870 Miles Trip %Trip Purpose % Land Use H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW H-W or C-W H-S or C-C H-O or C-NW Primary Diverted Pass-by Enclosed Parking with Elevator 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Hotel 16.60 8.40 6.90 19.40 61.60 19.00 58 38 4 Parking Lot 16.60 8.40 6.90 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 0 0 Implement NEV Network Employee Vanpool/Shuttle CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 21 of 30 5.0 Energy Detail ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Electricity Mitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 311.1238 311.1238 0.0143 2.9600e- 003 312.3414 Electricity Unmitigated 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 379.7662 379.7662 0.0175 3.6100e- 003 381.2525 NaturalGas Mitigated 0.0170 0.1543 0.1296 9.3000e- 004 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 167.9687 167.9687 3.2200e- 003 3.0800e- 003 168.9909 NaturalGas Unmitigated 0.0216 0.1963 0.1649 1.1800e- 003 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0000 213.7023 213.7023 4.1000e- 003 3.9200e- 003 215.0029 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy Exceed Title 24 Install High Efficiency Lighting 4.4 Fleet Mix LDA LDT1 LDT2 MDV LHD1 LHD2 MHD HHD OBUS UBUS MCY SBUS MH 0.511108 0.059746 0.180859 0.139188 0.042462 0.006666 0.016153 0.032295 0.001940 0.002496 0.004377 0.000582 0.002128 Historical Energy Use: N CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 22 of 30 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 4.00463e +006 0.0216 0.1963 0.1649 1.1800e- 003 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0000 213.7023 213.7023 4.1000e- 003 3.9200e- 003 215.0029 Total 0.0216 0.1963 0.1649 1.1800e- 003 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0149 0.0000 213.7023 213.7023 4.1000e- 003 3.9200e- 003 215.0029 Unmitigated NaturalGa s Use ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kBTU/yr tons/yr MT/yr Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 3.14761e +006 0.0170 0.1543 0.1296 9.3000e- 004 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 167.9687 167.9687 3.2200e- 003 3.0800e- 003 168.9909 Total 0.0170 0.1543 0.1296 9.3000e- 004 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0117 0.0000 167.9687 167.9687 3.2200e- 003 3.0800e- 003 168.9909 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 23 of 30 6.0 Area Detail 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 172814 49.4535 2.2700e- 003 4.7000e- 004 49.6471 Hotel 1.12963e +006 323.2616 0.0149 3.0700e- 003 324.5266 Parking Lot 24640 7.0512 3.2000e- 004 7.0000e- 005 7.0788 Total 379.7662 0.0175 3.6100e- 003 381.2525 Unmitigated Electricity Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use kWh/yr MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 130828 37.4387 1.7200e- 003 3.6000e- 004 37.5852 Hotel 937903 268.3968 0.0123 2.5500e- 003 269.4472 Parking Lot 18480 5.2884 2.4000e- 004 5.0000e- 005 5.3091 Total 311.1238 0.0143 2.9600e- 003 312.3414 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 24 of 30 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category tons/yr MT/yr Mitigated 0.7592 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 Unmitigated 0.7592 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.1604 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5984 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 3.7000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 Total 0.7592 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 25 of 30 Install Low Flow Bathroom Faucet Install Low Flow Kitchen Faucet Install Low Flow Toilet Install Low Flow Shower Turf Reduction 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water 7.0 Water Detail 6.2 Area by SubCategory ROG NOx CO SO2 Fugitive PM10 Exhaust PM10 PM10 Total Fugitive PM2.5 Exhaust PM2.5 PM2.5 Total Bio- CO2 NBio- CO2 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e SubCategory tons/yr MT/yr Architectural Coating 0.1604 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Consumer Products 0.5984 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Landscaping 3.7000e- 004 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 Total 0.7592 4.0000e- 005 3.9300e- 003 0.0000 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 1.0000e- 005 0.0000 7.5700e- 003 7.5700e- 003 2.0000e- 005 0.0000 8.0000e- 003 Mitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 26 of 30 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Category MT/yr Mitigated 15.8368 0.1157 2.8500e- 003 19.1511 Unmitigated 19.4062 0.1447 3.5700e- 003 23.5497 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 4.41382 / 0.490424 19.4062 0.1447 3.5700e- 003 23.5497 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 19.4062 0.1447 3.5700e- 003 23.5497 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 27 of 30 8.1 Mitigation Measures Waste Institute Recycling and Composting Services 7.2 Water by Land Use Indoor/Out door Use Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use Mgal MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 3.53105 / 0.490424 15.8368 0.1157 2.8500e- 003 19.1511 Parking Lot 0 / 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 15.8368 0.1157 2.8500e- 003 19.1511 Mitigated 8.0 Waste Detail CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 28 of 30 Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e MT/yr Mitigated 9.6695 0.5715 0.0000 21.6699 Unmitigated 19.3390 1.1429 0.0000 43.3398 Category/Year 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 95.27 19.3390 1.1429 0.0000 43.3398 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 19.3390 1.1429 0.0000 43.3398 Unmitigated CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 29 of 30 10.0 Vegetation 8.2 Waste by Land Use Waste Disposed Total CO2 CH4 N2O CO2e Land Use tons MT/yr Enclosed Parking with Elevator 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Hotel 47.635 9.6695 0.5715 0.0000 21.6699 Parking Lot 0 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 0.0000 Total 9.6695 0.5715 0.0000 21.6699 Mitigated 9.0 Operational Offroad Equipment Type Number Hours/Day Days/Year Horse Power Load Factor Fuel Type CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2013.2.2 Date: 10/24/2016 11:32 AMPage 30 of 30 APPENDIX C BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES ANALYSIS 3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200 • Santa Ana, CA 92707 • T: 714.751.7373 • F: 714.545.8883 MEMORANDUM October 31, 2016 To: From: Christine Saunders Anaheim Planning Department Stacie A. Tennant BonTerra Psomas Subject: Biological Resources Analysis for the Anaheim Element Hotel Project in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California This Memorandum summarizes the results of the biological resources analysis for the Anaheim Element Hotel Project (hereinafter referred to as the “project site”) located in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate potential biological constraints on the project; identify potential impacts to biological resources that could result from implementation of the project; and recommend measures to avoid, minimize, and/or mitigate significant impacts. PROJECT LOCATION The project site is located west of Interstate (I) 5, north of Disney Way, and east of South Clementine Street at 200 Alro Way. The project site is depicted on the U.S. Geological Survey’s (USGS’) Anaheim 7.5-minute quadrangle. Urban, commercial, and residential development surrounds the project site. METHODS A literature review and records search was conducted to identify special status plants, wildlife, and habitats that have been reported to occur in the vicinity of the project site. The California Native Plant Society’s (CNPS’) Locational Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California and the California Department of Fish and Wildlife’s (CDFW’s) California Natural Diversity Database were reviewed to identify special status plants, wildlife, and habitats known to occur in the vicinity of the project site. The database search included the USGS’ Anaheim and Orange 7.5-minute quadrangles (CNPS 2016; CDFW 2016). These databases contain records of reported occurrences of federally and State-listed listed or proposed Endangered or Threatened species, CDFW Species of Special Concern, and other special status species or habitats. Following the literature review, a general analysis of the project site was conducted to describe existing conditions and determine the site’s potential to support special status biological resources. Psomas Senior Biologist Allison Rudalevige conducted a general walk-over survey of the project site on October 18, 2016. RESULTS The project site is comprised of bare ground, developed areas, and landscaping. Ornamental plants observed on the project site include species such as Bermuda grass (Cynodon dactylon), ornamental rose (Rosa sp.), India hawthorn (Rhaphiolepis indica), bottlebrush (Callistemon sp.), Mexican fan palm (Washingtonia robusta), pine (Pinus sp.) and gum tree (Eucalyptus sp.). Weedy species, such as cheeseweed (Malva parviflora) and common sow thistle (Sonchus oleraceus), were also present. No natural vegetation communities are present on the project site and most plant species observed are not native to the region. Christine Saunders October 31, 2016 Page 2 BonTerra Psomas Given the degree of surrounding urban development and lack of connectivity to natural open space areas, only urban-tolerant wildlife species are expected to occur on the project site; rock pigeon (Columba livia) and Botta’s pocket gopher (Thomomys bottae) burrows were observed. No special status vegetation types; federally and/or State-listed Threatened, Endangered, Rare, or candidate species; or non-listed special status plant or wildlife species were observed during the walk-over survey. Due to the lack of suitable habitat for these species on the project site, no special status plants or wildlife species are expected to occur on the project site. Therefore, there would be no impact on these species and no mitigation would be required. Drainages, which may include wetlands and “waters of the U.S.”, are protected under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (CWA) and are under the jurisdiction of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). “Waters of the U.S.” include navigable coastal and inland waters; lakes, rivers, streams, and their tributaries; interstate waters and their tributaries; wetlands adjacent to such waters; intermittent streams; and other waters that could affect interstate commerce. A CWA Section 401 Water Quality Certification from the Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) is required before the USACE will issue a Section 404 permit. In addition, if drainages on the project site meet the criteria established by Section 1600 of the California Fish and Game Code, the CDFW may require a Streambed Alteration Agreement prior to any modification of the bed, bank, or channel of streambeds on the project site. The project site does not support any potentially jurisdictional resources. OTHER CONSIDERATIONS Nesting Raptors Several raptor species (i.e., birds of prey) have potential to nest within mature trees (i.e., ornamental vegetation) on and adjacent to the project site. If construction activities would occur during the raptor nesting season (generally February 1 to June 30), the loss of an active nest of any raptor species, including common raptor species, would be considered a violation of Sections 3503, 3503.5, and 3513 of the California Fish and Game Code and would be considered significant. Impact on active nests would be reduced to a less than significant level with implementation of Mitigation Measure (MM) 5.3-1. Nesting Birds Vegetation on and adjacent to the project site has the potential to support birds subject to the Migratory Bird Treaty Act (MBTA). The MBTA prohibits the taking of migratory birds and their nests and eggs. Bird species protected under the provisions of the MBTA are identified by the List of Migratory Birds (Code of Federal Regulations, Title 50, Section 10.13). Any impact on an active bird nest would be considered a violation of the MBTA and would be considered significant. Impacts on active nests would be reduced to a less than significant level with the implementation of MM 5.3-2. MITIGATION MEASURES The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C were adopted in connection with Supplemental Environmental Impact Report (SEIR) No. 340. The following measures also would be applicable to the proposed project. MM 5.3-1 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a survey for active raptor nests shall be conducted by a qualified Biologist and submitted to the Planning Department 30 days prior to commencement of any demolition or construction activities during the raptor nesting season (February 1 to June 30) and within 500 feet of a fan palm, juniper, or canary island pine. Should an Christine Saunders October 31, 2016 Page 3 BonTerra Psomas active nest be identified, restrictions defined by a qualified Biologist will be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of any active nest observed until the nest is no longer active, as determined by a qualified Biologist. These restrictions may include a 300- to 500-foot buffer zone designated around a nest to allow construction to proceed while minimizing disturbance to the active nest. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. MM 5.3-2 Prior to the issuance of a demolition permit, grading permit, or building permit, whichever occurs first, a letter detailing the proposed schedule for vegetation removal activities shall be submitted to the Planning Department, verifying that removal shall take place between August 1 and February 28 to avoid the bird nesting season. This would ensure that no active nests would be disturbed. If this is not feasible, then a qualified Biologist shall inspect any trees/shrubs which would be impacted prior to demolition, grading or construction activities to ensure no nesting birds are present. If a nest is present, then appropriate minimization measures shall be developed by the Biologist. Psomas appreciates the opportunity to assist you on this project. If you have any questions or comments, please contact Stacie Tennant at (714) 751-7373. REFERENCES California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW). 2016. California Natural Diversity Database. Records of Occurrence for the USGS Anaheim and Orange 7.5-minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CDFW, Natural Heritage Division. California Native Plant Society (CNPS). 2016. Locational Inventory of Rare and Endangered Vascular Plants of California. Records of Occurrence for the USGS Anaheim and Orange 7.5-minute quadrangles. Sacramento, CA: CNPS. http://www.cnps.org/inventory. R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009105\Technical Reports\Memo_Bio Resources-103116.docx APPENDIX D HISTORIC RESOURCES MEMO City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT Planning Services Division 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net Date: November 2, 2016 To: Elaine Thienprasiddhi, Senior Planner From: Christine Nguyen, Historic Preservation Planner RE: REVIEW OF HISTORIC STATUS FOR 200 WEST ALRO WAY The building on the property currently addressed as 200 West Alro Way is not classified as historic. The City maintains a local inventory of historic structures (attached). None of the historic classifications included in this list contain the above address. In addition, this property is not located within any of the City’s local historic districts or National Register Districts. Attachments Revised 6/14/2016 CITY OF ANAHEIM LIST OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES City of Anaheim Planning Department CITY OF ANAHEIM LIST OF HISTORIC STRUCTURES Table of Contents Introduction……………………………………………………………………………………………………………..1 Colony Historic District Contributors………………………………………………………………………...2 Five Points District Contributors……………………………………………………………………………..33 Historic Palm District Contributors ………………………………………………………………………….36 Hoskins District Contributors………………………………………………………………………………….43 Citywide Historically Significant Structures……………………………………………………………..46 Citywide Structures of Historical Interest………………………………………………………………..48 1 INTRODUCTION The City of Anaheim has identified the following list of properties as buildings that merit historic designation. There are three different local designations for historic resources in Anaheim: I. Contributors to the significance of one of the City’s four historic districts: the Colony Historic District, the Five Points District. The Historic Palm District, and the Hoskins District II. Citywide Historically Significant Structures III. Citywide Structures of Historical Interest This list indicates both the local designation of each property and any additional Qualified Historic Structure (Q.H.S.) distinctions it has earned, including Mills Act Agreements and inclusion in the National Register of Historic Places. ***Please note that inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract. Please contact the City for specific information on the eligibility of a property. 2 COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT The Anaheim Colony Historic District is the city's first and largest historic district, adopted by City Council in October 1997. The boundaries of the Colony match the original German Colony founded in 1857 – North, South, East and West Streets. Over 1,100 qualified structures are located within this 1.8‐square mile area. The district reflects the architectural timeline of Anaheim’s past, with eclectic styles that include Victorian, Colonial Revival, Craftsman, French, Spanish, English, and Ranch Style. Buildings located within the Colony Historic District must meet the following conditions to be considered contributors to the significance of the district: I. Constructed before 1949, the period of significance for the Colony Historic District II. Associated with significant themes identified for the district. III. Retaining historic integrity from the period of significance CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 3 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 201 E. Adele St. 1880‐96 X 202 E. Adele St. 1872 X 206 E. Adele St. 1922 MA X 209 E. Adele St. 1920 (w) 214 E. Adele St. 216 E. Adele St. 217 E. Adele St. 1920 (w) 226 E. Adele St. 1860s NRD X 228 E. Adele St. 1860s NRD X 229 E. Adele St. 233 E. Adele St. 1928 237 E. Adele St. 241 E. Adele St. 300 E. Adele St. 301 E. Adele St. 304 E. Adele St. 305 E. Adele St. 1910 MA X 308 E. Adele St. 1911 X 309 E. Adele St. 1901 X 413 E. Adele St. 416 E. Adele St. 417 E. Adele St. 420 E. Adele St. 1948 421 E. Adele St. 502 E. Adele St. 1900 X 504 E. Adele St. 1922 (w) 508 E. Adele St. 509 E. Adele St. 510 E. Adele St. 514 E. Adele St. 518 E. Adele St. 525 E. Adele St. 114‐116 E. Alberta St. 120 E. Alberta St. 124 E. Alberta St. 202 E. Alberta St. 203 E. Alberta St. 206 E. Alberta St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 4 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 207 E. Alberta St. 1909 MA X 210 E. Alberta St. 211 E. Alberta St. 1937 214 E. Alberta St. 215 E. Alberta St. 218 E. Alberta St. 219 E. Alberta St. 222 E. Alberta St. 302 E. Alberta St. 1914 X 303 E. Alberta St. 306 E. Alberta St. 1918 X 310 E. Alberta St. 318 E. Alberta St. 323 E. Alberta St. 324 E. Alberta St. 214 W. Alberta St. 1937 407 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1921 (w) 501‐503 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1925 (w) 507 N. Anaheim Blvd. 511 N. Anaheim Blvd. 521 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1918 (w) 601 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1922 (w) 611 N. Anaheim Blvd. 615 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1931 620 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1928 624 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1922 (w) 630 N. Anaheim Blvd. 714 N. Anaheim Blvd. 1922 (w) 241 S. Anaheim Blvd. 1908 NR X 327 S. Anaheim Blvd. 1921 X 454 S. Anaheim Blvd. 1919 X 500 S. Anaheim Blvd. 549 S. Anaheim Blvd. 1911 X 703 S. Anaheim Blvd. 717 S. Anaheim Blvd. 100 S. Atchison St. 111 S. Atchison St. 117 S. Atchison St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 5 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 129 S. Atchison St. 1924 MA X 203 S. Atchison St. 1922 MA X 207 S. Atchison St. 1911 MA X 215 S. Atchison St. 1895 MA X 223 S. Atchison St. 1906 X 120 E. Broadway 202 E. Broadway 204 E. Broadway 1911 MA X 208 E. Broadway 1921 MA X 218 E. Broadway 1908 MA X 224 E. Broadway 1922 MA 320 E. Broadway 324 E. Broadway 403 E. Broadway 1915 MA / NRD X 407 E. Broadway 1907 NRD 503 E. Broadway 1910 NRD 507 E. Broadway 1906 NRD 510 E. Broadway 1910 NRD 511 E. Broadway 1906 MA/ NRD X 515 E. Broadway 1910 NRD 519 E. Broadway 1910 NRD 520 E. Broadway 1920 MA / NRD X 605 E. Broadway 611 E. Broadway 904 E. Broadway 1922 (w) 908 E. Broadway 912 E. Broadway 1920 (w) 924‐926 E. Broadway 1000 E. Broadway 1012 E. Broadway 1016 E. Broadway 1020 E. Broadway 1946 MA X 1024 E. Broadway 1108 E. Broadway 128 W. Broadway 202 W. Broadway 206 W. Broadway 1919 MA X 210 W. Broadway 1910 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 6 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 214 W. Broadway 1911 MA X 218‐220 1/2 W. Broadway 1921 MA X 310 W. Broadway 513 W. Broadway 1921 MA X 517 W. Broadway 1920 MA X 519‐521 W. Broadway 1923 MA X 525 W. Broadway 1936 611 W. Broadway 804 W. Broadway 1901 MA X 808 W. Broadway 1935 MA X 809 W. Broadway 1922 X 812 W. Broadway 815 W. Broadway 1925 X 816 W. Broadway 1935 MA X 817 W. Broadway 1910 X 825 W. Broadway 900 W. Broadway 1921 MA X 902 W. Broadway 1912 MA X 903 W. Broadway 1919 MA X 904 W. Broadway 1924 X 907 W. Broadway 1908 MA X 911 W. Broadway 1938 MA X 915 W. Broadway 1920 (w) 919 W. Broadway 1926 X 923 W. Broadway 1910 MA X 924 W. Broadway 1920 (w) 928 W. Broadway 930 W. Broadway 1936 MA X 936 W. Broadway 940 W. Broadway 1000 W. Broadway 1923 MA X 1001 W. Broadway 1921 (w) 1007 W. Broadway 1921 MA X 1011 W. Broadway 1921 (w) 1018 W. Broadway 1021 W. Broadway 1022 W. Broadway 1024 W. Broadway 1916 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 7 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 1025 W. Broadway 505 N. Bush St. 508 N. Bush St. 1924 (w) 509 N. Bush St. 512 N. Bush St. 1927 MA X 513 N. Bush St. 516 N. Bush St. 1940 X 517 N. Bush St. 1930 521 N. Bush St. 1930 MA X 529 N. Bush St. 305 S. Bush St. 308 S. Bush St. 314 S. Bush St. 315 S. Bush St. 317 S. Bush St. 325 S. Bush St. 1914 X 327 S. Bush St. 1909 X 403 S. Bush St. 1944 407 S. Bush St. 411 S. Bush St. 1914 X 414 S. Bush St. 415 S. Bush St. 201 E. Center St. 1924 NR/MA X 315 W. Chartres St. 1920 (w) 508 W. Chestnut St. 1945 MA X 512 W. Chestnut St. 520 W. Chestnut St. 1920 X 521 W. Chestnut St. 1918 (w) 524 W. Chestnut St. 525 W. Chestnut St. 1918 (w) 529 W. Chestnut St. 530 W. Chestnut St. 533 W. Chestnut St. 537 W. Chestnut St. 540 W. Chestnut St. 542 W. Chestnut St. 543 W. Chestnut St. 114 N. Citron St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 8 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 126 N. Citron St. 216 N. Citron St. 1923 (w) 220 N. Citron St. 1920 (w) 302 N. Citron St. 205 S. Citron St. 1923 X 209‐211 ½ S. Citron St. 1924 MA X 323 S. Citron St. 1931 MA X 327 S. Citron St. 1931 MA X 403 S. Citron St. 1931 MA X 411 S. Citron St. 1929 MA X 415 S. Citron St. 1923 (w) 417 S. Citron St. 1890 MA X 423 S. Citron St. 1922 (w) 427 S. Citron St. 1924 MA X 501 S. Citron St. 1924 (w) 506 S. Citron St. 1922 (w) 509 S. Citron St. 1929 510 S. Citron St. 1922 (w) 515 S. Citron St. 1923 (w) 523 S. Citron St. 1923 (w) 526 S. Citron St. 1922 (w) 530 S. Citron St. 1923 MA X 539 S. Citron St. 542 S. Citron St. 1922 (w) MA X 545 S. Citron St. 1938 MA X 546 S. Citron St. 1923 (w) MA X 554 S. Citron St. 1923 (w) 555 S. Citron St. 1937 709 S. Citron St. 1910 MA X 805 S. Citron St. 1915 X 210 N. Claudina St. 1921 MA X 216 N. Claudina St. 1904‐06 X 220 N. Claudina St. 1908 MA X 226 N. Claudina St. 1911 MA X 401 N. Claudina St. 1915 X 407 N. Claudina St. 1920 X 412 N. Claudina St. 1920 X 419‐421 N. Claudina St. 1920 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 9 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 423 N. Claudina St. 502 N. Claudina St. 506 N. Claudina St. 508 N. Claudina St. 606‐608 N. Claudina St. 618 N. Claudina St. 714 N. Claudina St. 1921 X 715 N. Claudina St. 1921 (w) 718 N. Claudina St. 719 N. Claudina St. 1945 727 N. Claudina St. 1921 MA X 731 N. Claudina St. 1922 (w) 735 N. Claudina St. 1923 (w) 743 N. Claudina St. 746 N. Claudina St. 1923 X 751 N. Claudina St. 1929 755 N. Claudina St. 1929 758 N. Claudina St. 319 S. Claudina St. 325 S. Claudina St. 403 S. Claudina St. 1922 (w) 601 S. Claudina St. 1907 X 610 S. Claudina St. 1932 MA X 622 S. Claudina St. 1923 (w) 626 S. Claudina St. 1923 (w) 631 S. Claudina St. 1930 706 S. Claudina St. 1948 MA X 205 N. Clementine St. 217 N. Clementine St. 221 N. Clementine St. 223 N. Clementine St. 500 N. Clementine St. 1922 MA X 507 N. Clementine St. 1921 (w) 510 N. Clementine St. 1922 MA X 511 N. Clementine St. 1930 MA X 514 N. Clementine St. 1929 X 515 N. Clementine St. 1930 521 N. Clementine St. 1923 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 10 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 522 N. Clementine St. 1936 600 N. Clementine St. 1940 601 N. Clementine St. 1928 X 604 N. Clementine St. 1922 (w) 605 N. Clementine St. 1929 610 N. Clementine St. 1921 (w) 611 N. Clementine St. 1924 MA X 614 N. Clementine St. 1924 MA X 615 N. Clementine St. 1938 618 N. Clementine St. 1921 (w) 619 N. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 620 N. Clementine St. 1932 MA X 621 N. Clementine St. 1930 626 N. Clementine St. 1921 MA X 630 N. Clementine St. 1929 X 700 N. Clementine St. 1926 X 701‐703 N. Clementine St. 1924 MA X 707 N. Clementine St. 1928 MA X 711 N. Clementine St. 1922 (w) 712 N. Clementine St. 1922 MA X 717 N. Clementine St. 1925 MA X 721 N. Clementine St. 722 N. Clementine St. 1926 MA X 724 N. Clementine St. 1923 X 725 N. Clementine St. 1925 (w) 726 N. Clementine St. 1923 X 729 N. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 730 N. Clementine St. 1927 MA X 733 N. Clementine St. 1923 MA X 734 N. Clementine St. 1924 MA X 737 N. Clementine St. 1924 MA X 741 N. Clementine St. 1922 (w) 742 N. Clementine St. 1922 (w) MA X 745 N. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 746 N. Clementine St. 1948 MA X 747 N. Clementine St. 1947 750 N. Clementine St. 1938 MA X 753 N. Clementine St. 1924 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 11 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 754 N. Clementine St. 1924 X 755 N. Clementine St. 1922 (w) 758‐760 N. Clementine St. 1923 MA X 761 N. Clementine St. 1932 308 S. Clementine St. 1920 MA X 312 S. Clementine St. 1921 MA X 316 S. Clementine St. 1920 MA X 519 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 526 S. Clementine St. 1923 MA X 527 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 530 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 531 S. Clementine St. 1923 X 534 S. Clementine St. 1941 539 S. Clementine St. 1939 540 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 545 S. Clementine St. 1927 (w) 547 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 550 S. Clementine St. 551 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 555 S. Clementine St. 1927 (w) 556 S. Clementine St. 559 S. Clementine St. 1928 560 S. Clementine St. 1924 (w) 600 S. Clementine St. 1924 (w) 601 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) MA X 605 S. Clementine St. 1923 MA X 606 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 609 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 610 S. Clementine St. 1924 MA X 614 S. Clementine St. 615 S. Clementine St. 617 S. Clementine St. 621 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 622 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 624 S. Clementine St. 1923 (w) 625 S. Clementine St. 1929 X 129 E. Cypress St. 225 E. Cypress St. 1922 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 12 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 229 E. Cypress St. 301 E. Cypress St. 302 E. Cypress St. 1880 MA X 305 E. Cypress St. 308 E. Cypress St. 1907 X 312 E. Cypress St. 1919 X 313 E. Cypress St. 1904 MA X 317 E. Cypress St. 320 E. Cypress St. 1906 MA X 900 E. Cypress St. 1882 MA X 518 S. Dickel St. 523 S. Dickel St. 1939 526 S. Dickel St. 1946 527 S. Dickel St. 1938 530 S. Dickel St. 1927 (w) 531 S. Dickel St. 1937 535 S. Dickel St. 1926 (w) 542 S. Dickel St. 1938 546 S. Dickel St. 1947 MA X 547 S. Dickel St. 551 S. Dickel St. 1946 MA X 554 S. Dickel St. 1928 555 S. Dickel St. 559 S. Dickel St. 1938 600 S. Dickel St. 1928 X 604 S. Dickel St. 1928 607 S. Dickel St. 608 S. Dickel St. 1938 MA X 609 S. Dickel St. 612 S. Dickel St. 1925 (w) MA X 616 S. Dickel St. 617 S. Dickel St. 1930 X 621 S. Dickel St. 1923 (w) 711 S. Dickel St. 1923 (w) 719 S. Dickel St. 1923 X 723 S. Dickel St. 1923 (w) 727 S. Dickel St. 1946 632 N East St. 1928 707 N. East St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 13 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 719 N. East St. 1923 (w) 518 S. East St. 1918 423 S. East St. 118‐120 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1929 200 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1923 X 201 E. Ellsworth Ave. 204 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1923 (w) 205 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 208 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1936 209 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 211 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 214 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1923 (w) 215 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 216 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 217 E. Ellsworth Ave. 220 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 221 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 225 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1930 229 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1931 X 300 E. Ellsworth Ave. 1924 (w) 306 E. Ellsworth Ave. 311 E. Ellsworth Ave. 129 W. Elm 1927 (w) 131‐135 W. Elm 1940 213 N. Emily 217 N. Emily 1907 X 221 N. Emily 1906 X 314 N. Emily 317 N. Emily 318 N. Emily 1921 (w) 410 N. Emily 411 N. Emily 1921 (w) 415 N. Emily 1920 (w) 416 N. Emily 419 N. Emily 423 N. Emily 1910 MA X 427 N. Emily 600 S. Emily 1923 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 14 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 605 S. Emily 611 S. Emily 1923 X 620 S. Emily 1925 (w) 622 S. Emily 1923 (w) 626 S. Emily 1925 (w) 627 S. Emily 1936 X 702 S. Emily 1945 MA X 719 S. Emily 1931 X 319 N. Harbor Blvd. 1931 MA X 415 N. Harbor Blvd. 1922 X 427 N. Harbor Blvd. 1941 MA X 711 N. Harbor Blvd. 1923 MA X 723 N. Harbor Blvd. 1947 727 N. Harbor Blvd. 1927 MA X 731 N. Harbor Blvd. 751 N. Harbor Blvd. 1926 (w) 123 S. Harbor Blvd. 400 S. Harbor Blvd. 406 S. Harbor Blvd. 522 S. Harbor Blvd. 1922 (w) 526 S. Harbor Blvd. 1922 (w) 532 S. Harbor Blvd. 534 S. Harbor Blvd. 1923 (w) 538 S. Harbor Blvd. 1923 (w) 541 S. Harbor Blvd. 542 S. Harbor Blvd. 1923 MA X 546 S. Harbor Blvd. 1923 (w) 550 S. Harbor Blvd. 1923 (w) 551 S. Harbor Blvd. 1939 MA X 620 S. Harbor Blvd. 1934 630 S. Harbor Blvd. 1923 (w) 702 S. Harbor Blvd. 706 S. Harbor Blvd. 1923 (w) 727 S. Harbor Blvd. 200 N. Helena St. 1920 (w) MA X 1‐2011/2‐203‐2031/2 N. Helena St. 1910 MA X 204 N. Helena St. 1921 (w) 208 N. Helena St. 1920 X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 15 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 209 N. Helena St. 1919 MA X 212 N. Helena St. 1922 X 213 N. Helena St. 216 N. Helena St. 1921 (w) 217 N. Helena St. 1936 MA X 219 N. Helena St. 223 N. Helena St. 1924 (w) 226 N. Helena St. 227 N. Helena St. 1912 MA X 314 S. Helena St. 427 S. Helena St. 522 S. Helena St. 1925 (w) 526 S. Helena St. 1924 (w) 530 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 531 S. Helena St. 1923 X 538 S. Helena St. 1926 (w) 541 S. Helena St. 1931 542 S. Helena St. 543 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 546 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 550 S. Helena St. 600 S. Helena St. 1923 MA X 609 S. Helena St. 1928 X 616 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 617 S. Helena St. 620 S. Helena St. 1947 621 S. Helena St. 1928 625 S. Helena St. 1928 628 S. Helena St. 629 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 631 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 700 S. Helena St. 1924 MA X 703 S. Helena St. 707 S. Helena St. 708 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 711 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 715 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 718 S. Helena St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 16 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 719‐721 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 723 S. Helena St. 726 S. Helena St. 1923 (w) 115‐119 S. Illinois St. 114 S. Illinois St. 1921 X 118 S. Illinois St. 1946 MA X 122 S. Illinois St. 123 S. Illinois St. 1923 MA X 129 S. Illinois St. 202 S. Illinois St. 211 S. Illinois St. 212 S. Illinois St. 1941 MA X 217 S. Illinois St. 1922 MA X 319‐321 S. Illinois St. 1923 X 322 S. Illinois St. 1948 MA X 323 S. Illinois St. 1925 (w) 326 S. Illinois St. 1923 (w) 330 S. Illinois St. 1923 MA X 331 S. Illinois St. 403 S. Illinois St. 1923 (w) 406 S. Illinois St. 1924 (w) MA X 413 S. Illinois St. 1931 MA X 414 S. Illinois St. 1947 MA X 418 S. Illinois St. 1923 (w) 419 S. Illinois St. 1925 (w) 422 S. Illinois St. 1928 423 S. Illinois St. 1938 426 S. Illinois St. 1927 (w) MA X 500 S. Illinois St. 1925 (w) 501 S. Illinois St. 1924 MA X 504 S. Illinois St. 1925 (w) 505 S. Illinois St. 508 S. Illinois St. 1924 X 511 S. Illinois St. 1923 X 512 S. Illinois St. 1924 MA X 513 S. Illinois St. 1923 X 514 S. Illinois St. 1925 MA X 515 S. Illinois St. 1924 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 17 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 517 S. Illinois St. 1924 MA X 518 S. Illinois St. 1924 (w) 520 S. Illinois St. 1925 (w) 521 S. Illinois St. 1924 (w) 523 S. Illinois St. 524 S. Illinois St. 1924 X 526 S. Illinois St. 1924 X 527 S. Illinois St. 1924 (w) 530 S. Illinois St. 1924 (w) 531 S. Illinois St. 1924 (w) 534 S. Illinois St. 1946 535 S. Illinois St. 1937 MA X 537 S. Illinois St. 1941 MA X 542 S. Illinois St. 1925 (w) 543 S. Illinois St. 1938 MA X 544 S. Illinois St. 1947 547 S. Illinois St. 1947 MA X 549 S. Illinois St. 1923 (w) 550 S. Illinois St. 1938 555 S. Illinois St. 1924 MA X 559 S. Illinois St. 1940 MA X 322 S. Indiana St. 1929 323 S. Indiana St. 1926 (w) 326 S. Indiana St. 1929 X 327 S. Indiana St. 1923 (w) MA X 330 S. Indiana St. 1929 407 S. Indiana St. 411 S. Indiana St. 1938 415 S. Indiana St. 1931 MA X 418 S. Indiana St. 1931 419 S. Indiana St. 1936 MA X 422 S. Indiana St. 1931 MA X 423 S. Indiana St. 1930 X 426 S. Indiana St. 1940 511 S. Indiana St. 515 S. Indiana St. 1923 (w) MA X 518 S. Indiana St. 1936 519 S. Indiana St. 1935 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 18 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 522 S. Indiana St. 1932 523 S. Indiana St. 1940 526 S. Indiana St. 1938 MA X 527 S. Indiana St. 1936 531 S. Indiana St. 1930‐31 X 535 S. Indiana St. 1929 X 536 S. Indiana St. 1932 MA X 539 S. Indiana St. 542 S. Indiana St. 1936 MA X 547 S. Indiana St. 1935 MA X 548 S. Indiana St. 1936 MA X 549 S. Indiana St. 1938 X 555 S. Indiana St. 1932 MA X 559 S. Indiana St. 1940 X 300 N. Janss St. 1937 X 301 N. Janss St. 1925 X 306 N. Janss St. 1926 MA X 307 N. Janss St. 1925 (w) 311 N. Janss St. 314 N. Janss St. 1925 (w) 315 N. Janss St. 1923 (w) 318 N. Janss St. 1925 MA X 326 N. Janss St. 1924 (w) 327 N. Janss St. 1929 MA X 330 N. Janss St. 1925 (w) MA X 331 N. Janss St. 1924 MA X 400 N. Janss St. 1923 (w) 401 N. Janss St. 1926 (w) 404 N. Janss St. 1930 405 N. Janss St. 408 N. Janss St. 1936 MA X 412 N. Janss St. 1936 417 N. Janss St. 1936 MA X 421 N. Janss St. 1935 MA X 424 N. Janss St. 1935 MA X 427 N. Janss St. 1936 X 523 S. Janss St. 1922 (w) 527 S. Janss St. 1948 CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 19 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 531 S. Janss St. 1922 (w) 543 S. Janss St. 1921 (w) 553 S. Janss St. 1921 (w) 902 W. Ken Way 1947 MA X 112 S. Kroeger St. 1908 NRD 113 S. Kroeger St. 1905 MA/ NRD X 117 S. Kroeger St. 1906 MA / NRD X 120 S. Kroeger St. 1910 NRD 123 S. Kroeger St. 1921 NRD 124 S. Kroeger St. 1914 NRD 125 S. Kroeger St. 1906 NRD X 128 S. Kroeger St. 1910 NRD 129 S. Kroeger St. 1904 NRD 202 S. Kroeger St. 1914 NRD 203 S. Kroeger St. 1908 NRD 206 S. Kroeger St. 1914 NRD 207 S. Kroeger St. 1906 NRD X 210 S. Kroeger St. 1914 NRD 211 S. Kroeger St. 1912 NRD 214 S. Kroeger St. 1914 NRD 308 S. Kroeger St. 1920 (w) 312 S. Kroeger St. 322 S. Kroeger St. 323 S. Kroeger St. 1918 (w) 326 S. Kroeger St. 331 S. Kroeger St. 1920 (w) 302 N. Lemon St. 1905 X 306 N. Lemon St. 1902 X 308 N. Lemon St. 1870 X 320 N. Lemon St. 1919 (w) 324 N. Lemon St. 402 N. Lemon St. 1908 MA X 501 N. Lemon St. 1924 MA X 502 N. Lemon St. 1915 MA X 506 N. Lemon St. 1918 MA X 507 N. Lemon St. 1921 (w) 511 N. Lemon St. 1923 (w) 516 N. Lemon St. 1920 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 20 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 518 N. Lemon St. 1915 MA X 521 N. Lemon St. 1922 MA X 602 N. Lemon St. 1919 MA X 604 N. Lemon St. 607 N. Lemon St. 1922 MA X 610 N. Lemon St. 1921 MA X 614 N. Lemon St. 615 N. Lemon St. 1921 MA X 618 N. Lemon St. 1920 w 619 N. Lemon St. 1948 622 N. Lemon St. 623 N. Lemon St. 1937 626 N. Lemon St. 1914 MA X 627 N. Lemon St. 1947 628 N. Lemon St. 631 N. Lemon St. 1907 X 702 N. Lemon St. 1920 (w) 703 N. Lemon St. 1908 MA X 706 N. Lemon St. 1920 (w) 709‐711‐715‐717 N. Lemon St. 1926 X 710 N. Lemon St. 1920 X 714 N. Lemon St. 1920 (w) 718 N. Lemon St. 1920 (w) 720 N. Lemon St. 725 N. Lemon St. 1922 (w) 729 N. Lemon St. 1923 MA X 731‐733 N. Lemon St. 1923 X 732 N. Lemon St. 738 N. Lemon St. 1924 (w) 739‐739½‐741‐741½ N. Lemon St. 1923 (w) 742 N. Lemon St. 1922 (w) 743‐743½‐745‐745½ N. Lemon St. 1923 (w) 746 N. Lemon St. 1922 (w) 747 N. Lemon St. 1863 X 750 N. Lemon St. 1928 (w) 310 S. Lemon St. 1922 (w) 321 S. Lemon St. 1921 (w) 327 S. Lemon St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 21 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 523 S. Lemon St. 527 S. Lemon St. 1929 532 S. Lemon St. 1932 535 S. Lemon St. 1920 (w) 543 S. Lemon St. 1924 (w) 546 S. Lemon St. 547 S. Lemon St. 1929 550 S. Lemon St. 1923 (w) 554 S. Lemon St. 1922 (w) 602 S. Lemon St. 604 S. Lemon St. 1927 MA X 605 S. Lemon St. 1930 608 S. Lemon St. 1911 MA X 609 S. Lemon St. 1921 (w) 612 S. Lemon St. 613 S. Lemon St. 616 S. Lemon St. 1921 X 617 S. Lemon St. 1921 (w) 620 S. Lemon St. 1920 MA X 621 S. Lemon St. 1921 (w) 624 S. Lemon St. 1903 MA X 625 S. Lemon St. 629 S. Lemon St. 1922 (w) 701 S. Lemon St. 1936 702 S. Lemon St. 1920 (w) 707 S. Lemon St. 1924 (w) 711 S. Lemon St. 1908 X 722 S. Lemon St. 1916 MA X 726 S. Lemon St. 1921 (w) 1155 E. Lincoln Ave. 1917 MA X 1175 E. Lincoln Ave. 1928 MA X 609 W. Lincoln Ave. 702 W. Lincoln Ave. 706 W. Lincoln Ave. 710 W. Lincoln Ave. 1910 X 811 W. Lincoln Ave. 903 W. Lincoln Ave. 911 W. Lincoln Ave. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 22 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 919 W. Lincoln Ave. 925 W. Lincoln Ave. 1001 W. Lincoln Ave. 1910 X 1018 W. Lincoln Ave. 112 S. Melrose St. 1910 NRD 115 S. Melrose St. pre 1918 NRD 119 S. Melrose St. 1923 NRD 123 S. Melrose St. 1913 MA / NRD X 124 S. Melrose St. 1907 NRD 128 S. Melrose St. 1906 MA / NRD X 202 S. Melrose St. 1910 NRD 203 S. Melrose St. 1912 MA / NRD X 206 S. Melrose St. 1923 NRD 207 S. Melrose St. 1906 NRD 210 S. Melrose St. pre 1918 NRD 214 S. Melrose St. 1916 MA / NRD X 410 S. Melrose St. 417 S. Melrose St. 1920 (w) 427 S. Melrose St. 1921 (w) 1001 E. North St. 1910 X 623 W. North St. 1948 X 1003 W. North St. 1947 109 N. Ohio St. 129 S. Ohio St. 1906 X 204 S. Ohio St. 1918 X 206 S. Ohio St. 1936 213‐215 S. Ohio St. 314 S. Ohio St. 1925 (w) 317 S. Ohio St. 318 S. Ohio St. 1948 MA X 322 S. Ohio St. 19376 MA X 323 S. Ohio St. 1941 327 S. Ohio St. 1929 330 S. Ohio St. 1923 MA X 331 S. Ohio St. 1929 405 S. Ohio St. 1921 MA X 406 S. Ohio St. 1928 MA X 410 S. Ohio St. 1928 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 23 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 411 S. Ohio St. 1942 MA X 414 S. Ohio St. 1939 MA X 418 S. Ohio St. 1931 MA X 419 S. Ohio St. 1927 X 422 S. Ohio St. 1923 MA X 500 S. Ohio St. 1929 MA X 501 S. Ohio St. 505 S. Ohio St. 506 S. Ohio St. 1936 MA X 510 S. Ohio St. 1936 511 S. Ohio St. 1924 MA X 514 S. Ohio St. 1936 MA X 519 S. Ohio St. 1940 522 S. Ohio St. 523 S. Ohio St. 526 S. Ohio St. 1939 X 527 S. Ohio St. 1924 MA X 531 S. Ohio St. 1930 X 541 S. Ohio St. 1927 (w) 542 S. Ohio St. 1936 543 S. Ohio St. 1938 545 S. Ohio St. 1923 (w) 551 S. Ohio St. 1924 MA X 554 S. Ohio St. 1939 MA X 555 S. Ohio St. 1923 MA X 559 S. Ohio St. 1939 211 N. Olive St. 1916 MA X 215 N. Olive St. 1921 (w) 217 N. Olive St. 1922 MA X 305‐307 N. Olive St. 1921 (w) 311 N. Olive St. 315 N. Olive St. 319 N. Olive St. 323 N. Olive St. 325 N. Olive St. 1920 X 412 N. Olive St. 416 N. Olive St. 420 N. Olive St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 24 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 422 N. Olive St. 507 N. Olive St. 510 N. Olive St. 1925 (w) 511 N. Olive St. 1920 (w) 515 N. Olive St. 516 N. Olive St. 1924 (w) 702 N. Olive St. 704 N. Olive St. 1922 (w) 716 N. Olive St. 1922 (w) 719 N. Olive St. 1924 X 720 N. Olive St. 1929 724 N. Olive St. 725 N. Olive St. 728 N. Olive St. 1922 (w) 733 N. Olive St. 735 N. Olive St. 1923 (w) 736 N. Olive St. 1922 (w) 738‐740 N. Olive St. 1923 (w) 748 N. Olive St. 1922 (w) 752 N. Olive St. 1922 (w) 756 N. Olive St. 1929 115 S. Olive St. 1893 MA / NRD X 116‐118 S. Olive St. 1922 MA / NRD X 119 S. Olive St. 1912 MA / NRD X 123 S. Olive St. 1903 NRD 309 S. Olive St. 1922 (w) 402 S. Olive St. 1901 X 407 S. Olive St. 408 S. Olive St. 409 S. Olive St. 1911 X 415 S. Olive St. 1910 X 416 S. Olive St. 420 S. Olive St. 601 S. Olive St. 1930 609 S. Olive St. 1924 MA X 703 S. Olive St. 1927 MA X 708 N. Pauline St. 713 N. Pauline St. 1925 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 25 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 720 N. Pauline St. 1946 721 N. Pauline St. 1922 (w) 729 N. Pauline St. 1923 (w) 733 N. Pauline St. 1923 (w) 740 N. Pauline St. 742 N. Pauline St. 1922 (w) 754 N. Pauline St. 1923 (w) 757 N. Pauline St. 1923 (w) 200 N. Philadelphia St. 1928 MA X 240 N. Philadelphia St. 1914 MA X 280 N. Philadelphia St. 1921 MA X 303 N. Philadelphia St. 1911 MA / NRD X 307 N. Philadelphia St. 1914 NRD X 314 N. Philadelphia St. 316 N. Philadelphia St. 317 N. Philadelphia St. 1910 NRD X 321 N. Philadelphia St. 1903 MA / NRD X 327 N. Philadelphia St. 1920 (w) 417 N. Philadelphia St. 421‐423 N. Philadelphia St. 425‐427 N. Philadelphia St. 502 N. Philadelphia St. 503 N. Philadelphia St. 1920 (w) 506 N. Philadelphia St. 507 N. Philadelphia St. 508 N. Philadelphia St. 511 N. Philadelphia St. 1908 X 623‐625 N. Philadelphia St. 1922 (w) 717‐719 N. Philadelphia St. 722 N. Philadelphia St. 1922 (w) 727 N. Philadelphia St. 1922 (w) 314‐316 S. Philadelphia St. 322 S. Philadelphia St. 329 S. Philadelphia St. 403 S. Philadelphia St. 406 S. Philadelphia St. 410 S. Philadelphia St. 1923 (w) 601 S. Philadelphia St. 1923 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 26 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 609 S. Philadelphia St. 1930 X 611 S. Philadelphia St. 718 S. Philadelphia St. 1924 (w) 301 N. Pine St. 1927 X 314 N. Pine St. 1925 (w) 317 N. Pine St. 1948 MA X 318 N. Pine St. 1927 MA X 322 N. Pine St. 1927 X 323 N. Pine St. 1924 MA X 325 N. Pine St. 1931 MA X 330 N. Pine St. 1937 331 N. Pine St. 1935 MA X 401 N. Pine St. 1923 MA X 404 N. Pine St. 1935 405 N. Pine St. 1936 MA X 408 N. Pine St. 1937 X 409 N. Pine St. 1937 417 N. Pine St. 1940 421 N. Pine St. 1935 MA X 424 N. Pine St. 1935 MA X 425 N. Pine St. 1930 MA X 110 N. Resh St. 1923 (w) X 116 N. Resh St. 1937 119 N. Resh St. 1920 X 123 N. Resh St. 1906 X 124 N. Resh St. 125 N. Resh St. 201 N. Resh St. 1912 MA X 211 N. Resh St. 213 N. Resh St. 217 N. Resh St. 221 N. Resh St. 1910 MA X 225 N. Resh St. 1919 (w) 229 N. Resh St. 302 N. Resh St. 1914 MA X 303 N. Resh St. 309 N. Resh St. 1922 MA X 511 S. Resh St. 1922 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 27 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 519 S. Resh St. 1922 (w) 521 S. Resh St. 527 S. Resh St. 1922 (w) 534 S. Resh St. 1921 (w) 539 S. Resh St. 1925 MA X 543 S. Resh St. 1922 MA X 549 S. Resh St. 1921 (A) 555 S. Resh St. 1922 (w) 558 S. Resh St. 1922 (w) 105 N. Rose St. 1890 MA X 110 N. Rose St. 1906 MA X 501 N. Rose St. 1926 X 508 N. Rose St. 518 N. Rose St. 1936 308 S. Rose St. 315 S. Rose St. 1921 (w) 409 S. Rose St. 415 S. Rose St. 318 N. Sabina St. 1921 (w) 519 N. Sabina St. 700 N. Sabina St. 1924 (w) 708 N. Sabina St. 709 N. Sabina St. 1924 (w) 737 N. Sabina St. 749 N. Sabina St. 1924 (w) 761 N. Sabina St. 1922 (w) 1011 E. Santa Ana St. 1920 (w) 1025 E. Santa Ana St. 1101 E. Santa Ana St. 1921 (w) 1111 E. Santa Ana St. 706 W. Santa Ana St. 1922 (w) 114 E. South St. 200 E. South St. 1921 (w) 212 E. South St. 1920 (w) 216 E. South St. 1916 X 300 E. South St. 318 E. South St. 1923 (w) 109 W. South St. 1921 (w) CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 28 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 204 W. South St. 1910 X 311 W. South St. 1876 NR X 316 W. South St. 1916 114‐116 W. Stueckle Ave. 115 W. Stueckle Ave. 1923 MA X 121 W. Stueckle Ave. 1910 MA X 125 W. Stueckle Ave. 1945/1911 MA X 129 W. Stueckle Ave. 1897/1940 MA X 117 E. Sycamore St. 121 E. Sycamore St. 224 E. Sycamore St. 1915 MA X 232 E. Sycamore St. 236 E. Sycamore St. 1921 (w) 304 E. Sycamore St. 311 E. Sycamore St. 1928 MA X 315 E. Sycamore St. 325 E. Sycamore St. 403 E. Sycamore St. 412 E. Sycamore St. 424 E. Sycamore St. 504 E. Sycamore St. 512 E. Sycamore St. 516 E. Sycamore St. 700 E. Sycamore St. 1922 (w) 122 W. Sycamore St. 1911 X 128 W. Sycamore St. 1906 X 1008 W. Sycamore St. 1941 709 N. Topeka St. 1923 (w) 729 N. Topeka St. 1922 (w) 754 N. Topeka St. 108 N. Vine St. 1859 MA X 501 N. Vine St. 1930 507 N. Vine St. 1924 (w) 517 N. Vine St. 1924 (w) 521 N. Vine St. 1931 MA X 525 N. Vine St. 1929 MA X 529 N. Vine St. 1924 MA X 314 S. Vine St. CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 29 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 324 S. Vine St. 408 S. Vine St. 422 S. Vine St. 188 N. Vintage Ln. 1902 MA / NR X 194 N. Vintage Ln. 1905 MA X 198 N. Vintage Ln. 1907 MA X 200 N. Vintage Ln. 1911 MA X 128 E. Water St. 120‐122 W. Water St. 1912/1911 MA X 124‐126 W. Water St. 1921/1921 MA X 128‐130 W. Water St. 1921/1880 MA X 211 N. West St. 1934 217 N. West St. 1921 221 N. West St. 1921 306 N. West St. 1945 310 N. West St. 316 N. West St. 1936 319 N. West St. 1946 MA X 325 N. West St. 1941 335 N. West St. 414 N. West St. QHS X 415 N. West St. 418 N. West St. 1894 QHS X 607 N. West St. 754 N. West St. 760 N. West St. 1920 (w) 122 S. West St. 126 S. West St. 202 S. West St. 216 S. West St. 1920 (w) 324 S. West St. 1923 (w) 326 S. West St. 1923 (w) 330 S. West St. 1923 (w) 406 S. West St. 410 S. West St. 1928 416 S. West St. 1923 MA X 418 S. West St. 422 S. West St. 1941 MA X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 30 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 500 S. West St. 1941 506 S. West St. 1939 MA X 512 S. West St. 1937 520 S. West St. 1931 530 S. West St. 1938 MA X 542 S. West St. 1937 114 E. Wilhelmina St. 1928 X 115 E. Wilhelmina St. 1921 (w) 121 E. Wilhelmina St. 1923 MA X 125 E. Wilhelmina St. 1923 MA X 200 E. Wilhelmina St. 1924 X 206 E. Wilhelmina St. 1922 (w) 211 E. Wilhelmina St. 1923 MA X 215 E. Wilhelmina St. 1923 (w) 225 E. Wilhelmina St. 1921 (w) 302‐304 E. Wilhelmina St. 1922 (w) 303 E. Wilhelmina St. 1922 (w) 306 E. Wilhelmina St. 1922 (w) 307 E. Wilhelmina St. 1921 (w) 310 E. Wilhelmina St. 1922 (w) 311 E. Wilhelmina St. 1922 (w) 314‐316 E. Wilhelmina St. 1921 (w) 315 E. Wilhelmina St. 1921 (w) 318 E. Wilhelmina St. 1921 (w) 319 E. Wilhelmina St. 1921 (w) 320‐324 E. Wilhelmina St. 1928 325 E. Wilhelmina St. 507 E. Wilhelmina St. 1922 (w) 211 W. Wilhelmina St. 1923 X 502 N. Zeyn St. 503 N. Zeyn St. 1915 MA X 506 N. Zeyn St. 1915 MA X 507 N. Zeyn St. 510 N. Zeyn St. 1920 MA X 511 N. Zeyn St. 514 N. Zeyn St. 1915 MA X 515 N. Zeyn St. 520 N. Zeyn St. 1915 X CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1118 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 31 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 521 N. Zeyn St. 1915 MA X 602 N. Zeyn St. 1920 (w) 603 N. Zeyn St. 1920 X 604 N. Zeyn St. 1916 X 607 N. Zeyn St. 1920 MA X 610 N. Zeyn St. 1920 MA X 611 N. Zeyn St. 614 N. Zeyn St. 1912 MA X 615 N. Zeyn St. 618 N. Zeyn St. 619 N. Zeyn St. 1917 X 620 N. Zeyn St. 623 N. Zeyn St. 1917 X 626 N. Zeyn St. 627 N. Zeyn St. 1928 MA X 630 N. Zeyn St. 1918 X 631 N. Zeyn St. 1919 MA X 700 N. Zeyn St. 703 N. Zeyn St. 1915 MA X 706 N. Zeyn St. 707 N. Zeyn St. 1918 MA X 710 N. Zeyn St. 1920 (w) 711 N. Zeyn St. 714 N. Zeyn St. 1920 MA X 715 N. Zeyn St. 718 N. Zeyn St. 1919 (w) 719 N. Zeyn St. 1920 MA X 720 N. Zeyn St. 723 N. Zeyn St. 1920 (w) 726 N. Zeyn St. 727 N. Zeyn St. 1921 (w) 730 N. Zeyn St. 1922 (w) 731 N. Zeyn St. 1922 MA X 734 N. Zeyn St. 1935 MA X 735‐737 N. Zeyn St. 1921 MA X 738 N. Zeyn St. 1922 (w) 743 N. Zeyn St. 1927 746 N. Zeyn St. 1922 MA X MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 32 Revised 6/14/2016 CITY OF ANAHEIM COLONY HISTORIC DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualified Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 1117 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 747 N. Zeyn St. 1921 (w) 750 N. Zeyn St. 1922 MA X 751 N. Zeyn St. 1927 MA X 754 N. Zeyn St. 757 N. Zeyn St. 1932 X 760 N. Zeyn St. 1923 X 761 N. Zeyn St. 532 S. Zeyn St. 535‐537 S. Zeyn St. 1938 540 S. Zeyn St. 541‐543 S. Zeyn St. 1941 MA X 551 S. Zeyn St. 555 S. Zeyn St. 1937 MA X 560 S. Zeyn St. 1939 561 S. Zeyn St. 33 FIVE POINTS DISTRICT The Five Points District was adopted by City Council in October 2004 as a historic district to preserve a concentration of architecturally unique and significant homes from about the same era as the Anaheim Colony Historic District. The Five Points Historic District was the next historic district to be established after the original Colony Historic District. Its name is derived from the Five Points street intersection at Lincoln, West, and Center Streets, where the historic Five Points commercial building was originally built. This building has been moved westerly, completely restored and is now home to a Ruby's Deluxe Restaurant and Drive‐in. Buildings located within the Five Points District must meet the following conditions to be considered contributors to the significance of the district: I. Constructed between 1941 and 1955, the period of significance for the Five Points District II. Associated with significant themes identified for the district. III. Retaining historic integrity from the period of significance THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FIVE POINTS DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 40 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 34 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 1101 W. Broadway 1946 1111 W. Broadway 1921 1123 W. Broadway 1921 1127 W. Broadway 1922 1131‐1131½ W. Broadway 1921 1139 W. Broadway 1919 1143 W. Broadway 1925 1100 W. Center St. 1922 X 1104 W. Center St. 1907 X 1108‐10 W. Center St. 1924 MA X 1114 W. Center St. 1921 MA X 1118 W. Center St. 1902 1122 W. Center St. 1918 MA X 1124‐26 W. Center St. 1921 MA X 1129 W. Center St. 1925 1130 W. Center St. 1921 MA X 1204 W. Center St. 1916 X 1207 W. Center St. 1910 1215 W. Center St. 1922 1219 W. Center St. 1924 X 1225 W. Center St. 1911 MA X 114 S. Cherry St. 1938 1119 W. Chestnut St. 1914 1120 W. Chestnut St. 1907 X 1124 W. Chestnut St. 1922 MA X 1128 W. Chestnut St. 1922 1128 W. Lincoln Ave. 1922 110 S. Walnut St. 1923 116 S. Walnut St. 1922 MA X 125 S. Walnut St. 1915 126 S. Walnut St. 1926 131 S. Walnut St. 1925 200 S. Walnut St. 1940 201 S. Walnut St. 1913 X 214 S. Walnut St. 1923 MA X THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FIVE POINTS DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 40 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 35 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 123 S. West St. 1938 MA X 125 S. West St. 1922 X 203 S. West St. 1923 MA X 211 S. West St. 1921 215 S. West St. 1920 MA X 36 HISTORIC PALM DISTRICT In October 2006, City Council adopted the addition of our third district, the Historic Palm District. The district is named after Palm Street, currently known as Harbor Boulevard, and it fills the gap between North Street and La Palma Avenue north of the Anaheim Colony Historic District. This Historic Palm District has almost 180 contributors that are mostly French, English and Spanish themed. Buildings located within the Historic Palm District must meet the following conditions to be considered contributors to the significance of the district: I. Constructed before 1949, the period of significance for the Historic Palm District II. Associated with significant themes identified for the district. III. Retaining historic integrity from the period of significance THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HISTORIC PALM DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 176 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 37 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 915 N. Claudina St. 1910 X 917 N. Claudina St. 1936 X 921 N. Claudina St. 1945 924 N. Claudina St. 1934 932 N. Claudina St. 1929 937 N. Claudina St. 1939 801 N. Clementine St. 1930 804 N. Clementine St. 1939 805 N. Clementine St. 1924 MA X 808 N. Clementine St. 1936 809 N. Clementine St. 1928 X 816 N. Clementine St. 1930 817 N. Clementine St. 1948 820 N. Clementine St. 1930 MA X 821 N. Clementine St. 1941 MA X 824 N. Clementine St. 1929 MA X 825 N. Clementine St. 1946 828 N. Clementine St. 1929 829 N. Clementine St. 1923 832 N. Clementine St. 1935 835 N. Clementine St. 1923 X 841 N. Clementine St. 1924 X 844 N. Clementine St. 1936 845 N. Clementine St. 1924 849 N. Clementine St. 1927 852 N. Clementine St. 1935 900 N. Clementine St. 1931 901 N. Clementine St. 1920 908 N. Clementine St. 1921 912 N. Clementine St. 1938 916 N. Clementine St. 1923 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HISTORIC PALM DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 176 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 38 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 920 N. Clementine St. 1924 921 N. Clementine St. 1935 933 N. Clementine St. 1928 801 N. Dickel St. 1946 805 N. Dickel St. 1941 809 N. Dickel St. 1942 812 N. Dickel St. 1941 816 N. Dickel St. 1933 820 N. Dickel St. 1923 821 N. Dickel St. 1922 829 N. Dickel St. 1948 MA X 836 N. Dickel St. 1946 844 N. Dickel St. 1946 848 N. Dickel St. 1946 849 N. Dickel St. 1924 852 N. Dickel St. 1939 901 N. Dickel St. 1923 910 N. Dickel St. 1925 X 912 N. Dickel St. 1923 917 N. Dickel St. 1929 921 N. Dickel St. 1928 924 N. Dickel St. 1925 932 N. Dickel St. 1946 933 N. Dickel St. 1948 942 N. Dickel St. 1930 945 N. Dickel St. 1936 908 N. Emily St. 1945 917 N. Emily St. 1945 MA X 918 N. Emily St. 1930 920 N. Emily St. 1931 925 N. Emily St. 1926 X THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HISTORIC PALM DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 176 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 39 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 926 N. Emily St. 1945‐6 932 N. Emily St. 1924 842 N. Harbor Blvd. 1921 846 N. Harbor Blvd. 1922 852 N. Harbor Blvd. 1905 854 N. Harbor Blvd. 1941 928‐930 N. Harbor Blvd. 1923 938 N. Harbor Blvd. 1938 940 N. Harbor Blvd. 1923 804 N. Helena St. 1928 805 N. Helena St. 1931 MA X 807 N. Helena St. 1937 X 808 N. Helena St. 1937 812 N. Helena St. 1940 MA X 815 N. Helena St. 1932 X 816 N. Helena St. 1939 817 N. Helena St. 1900 822 N. Helena St. 1946 821 N. Helena St. 1941 824 N. Helena St. 1946 825 N. Helena St. 1925 MA X 829 N. Helena St. 1945 830 N. Helena St. 1942 832 N. Helena St. 1939 838 N. Helena St. 1947 842 N. Helena St. 1946 850 N. Helena St. 1941 857 N. Helena St. 1925 900 N. Helena St. 1927 917 N. Helena St. 1922 920 N. Helena St. 1924 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HISTORIC PALM DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 176 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 40 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 921 N. Helena St. 1928 925 N. Helena St. 1939 MA X 933 N. Helena St. 1948 937 N. Helena St. 1938 940 N. Helena St. 1938 945 N. Helena St. 1924 948 N. Helena St. 1948 315 E. Julianna St. 1906 333 E. Julianna St. 1931 334 E. Julianna St. pre‐1900 314 E. La Palma Ave. 1927 412 E. La Palma Ave. 1936 334 W. La Verne St. 1922 821 N. Lemon St. 1946 827 N. Lemon St. 1922 828 N. Lemon St. 1924 829 N. Lemon St. 1924 830 N. Lemon St. 1947 833 N. Lemon St. 1936 838 N. Lemon St. 1916 MA X 846 N. Lemon St. 1921 849 N. Lemon St. 1930 900 N. Lemon St. 1923 901‐903 N. Lemon St. 1922 MA X 118 E. Mills Dr. 1914 122 E. Mills Dr. 1942 200 E. Mills Dr. 1924 205‐207 E. Mills Dr. 1945 211‐213 E. Mills Dr. 1924 225 E. Mills Dr. 1947 229 E. Mills Dr. 1924 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HISTORIC PALM DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 176 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 41 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 235 E. Mills Dr. 1948 304 E. Mills Dr. 1929 X 307 E. Mills Dr. 1946 311 E. Mills Dr. 1927 317 E. Mills Dr. 1927 X 115 E. North St. 1926 211 E. North St. 1927 215 E. North St. 1928/9 219 E. North St. 1930 MA X 225 E. North St. 1942 307 E. North St. 1947 315 E. North St. 1899 319 E. North St. 1948 325 E. North St. 1946 401 W. North St. 1931 808 N. Olive St. 1931 MA X 812 N. Olive St. 1936 820 N. Olive St. 1937 909 N. Olive St. 1927 919 N. Olive St. 1937 1014 N. Patt St. 1916 1016 N. Patt St. 1916 1030 N. Patt St. 1927 1031 N. Patt St. 1938 1034 N. Patt St. 1919 813 N. Pauline St. 1945 818 N. Pauline St. 1925 819 N. Pauline St. 1920 821 N. Pauline St. 1946 824 N. Pauline St. 1925 925 N. Philadelphia St. 1930 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HISTORIC PALM DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 176 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 42 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 804 N. Sabina St. 1910 805 N. Sabina St. 1946 813 N. Sabina St. 1939 MA X 814 N. Sabina St. 1923 817 N. Sabina St. 1939 901 N. Sabina St. 1946/47 921 N. Sabina St. 1936 801 N. Topeka St. 1941 805 N. Topeka St. 1927 816 N. Topeka St. 1924 829 N. Topeka St. 1949 902 N. Topeka St. 1929 810 N. Zeyn St. 1939 811 N. Zeyn St. 1929 823 N. Zeyn St. 1932 830 N. Zeyn St. 1920 832 N. Zeyn St. 1922 839 N. Zeyn St. 1924 843 N. Zeyn St. 1923 853 N. Zeyn St. 1922 925‐27 N. Zeyn St. 1923 43 HOSKINS DISTRICT The City Council adopted the Hoskins Historic District in December 2008. This is a small neighborhood that was carved from the north end within the original Anaheim Colony Historic District and became its own independent district because it has an intact collection of interesting homes built in the 1940s and 1950s. It represents a more modern era in Anaheim’s history immediately following World War II. This district is populated by Ranch style houses that were favored by Anaheim’s middle class community leaders during the post‐war period. Buildings located within the Hoskins District must meet the following conditions to be considered contributors to the significance of the district: I. Constructed between 1941‐1955, the period of significance for the Hoskins District II. Associated with significant themes identified for the district. III. Retaining historic integrity from the period of significance THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HOSKINS DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 43 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 44 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 319 W. Alberta St. 1947 320 W. Alberta St.1947 X 400 W. Alberta St.1947 401 W. Alberta St.1946 408 W. Alberta St.1948 MA X 409 W. Alberta St.1954 MA X 415 W. Alberta St.1948 420 W. Alberta St.1948 421 W. Alberta St.1948 425 W. Alberta St.1946 426 W. Alberta St.1950 640 N. Helena St.1952 MA X 648 N. Helena St.1950 MA X 670 N. Helena St.1951 MA X 685 N. Helena St.1952 MA X 698 N. Helena St.1955 700 N. Helena St.1941 701 N. Helena St.1951 711 N. Helena St.1954 MA X 712 N. Helena St.1942 720 N. Helena St.1941 727 N. Helena St.1946 732 N. Helena St.1951 MA X 740 N. Helena St.1947 MA X 400 W. Leonora St.1953 401 W. Leonora St.1947 408 W. Leonora St.1949 415 W. Leonora St.1946 MA X 420 W. Leonora St.1950 421 W. Leonora St.1953 424 W. Leonora St.1947 425 W. Leonora St.1953 325 W. Park Way 1941 MA X 400 W. Park Way 1950 407 W. Park Way 1951 415 W. Park Way 1950 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM HOSKINS DISTRICT Contributors List and Qualfied Historic Structures Status Total Contributors: 43 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 45 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Year Built Q.H.S. Status Surveyed 420 W. Park Way 1947 423 W. Park Way 1946 325 W. Sycamore St.1948 405 W. Sycamore St.1948 427 W. Sycamore St.1951 412 W. Wilhelmina St.1951 MA X 420 W. Wilhelmina St.1950 MA X 46 CITYWIDE HISTORICALLY SIGNIFICANT STRUCUTRES Citywide Historically Significant Structures are individually eligible properties outside of the City’s historic districts. These Qualified Historic Structures are over 50 years old and meet one or more of the following criteria: 1. Strongly represents a significant event or broad patterns of local, regional, or national history 2. Associated with the life of a significant person in local, regional, or national history 3. A very good example of a significant architectural style, property type, period, or method of construction; or represents the work of an architect, designer, engineer, or builder who is locally, regionally, or nationally significant; or a significant visual feature of the City THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CITYWIDE Historically Significant Structures Total Contributors: 12 MA = Mills Act Agreement recorded and on file NRD = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places as District or Neighborhood NR = Listed on the National Register of Historic Places (w) = Water Connection Earliest Date Found (A) = Assessor *Inclusion of a property on this list does not guarantee eligibility for a Mills Act Contract 47 Revised 6/14/2016 Address Historic or Resource Name Year Built Register Mills Act 887 S. Anaheim Blvd. Truxaw‐Gervais House 1909 National Yes 1406 W. Ball Rd. Holman House 1905 Yes 839 N. Citron St. The Strain House 1925 Yes 717 S. Dale Ave. Mumm House 1924 Yes 2040 S. Haster St. Bostick House 1931 Yes 2651 E. Jackson Ave. Hausladen House 1914 Yes 623 W. North St. The Krogen‐Smith House 1948 Yes 807 S. Nutwood St. Long House 1937 Yes 431 S. Peralta Hills Drive Schellens House 1921 Yes 1219 E. Santa Ana St. The Beard House 1910 Yes 6398 E. Santa Ana Canyon Rd. Peralta Adobe 1871 County 2200 W. Sequoia Ave. Phillip Ackley Stanton Home 1928 National 48 CITYWIDE STRUCTURES OF HISTORICAL INTEREST The City of Anaheim maintains a list of Structures of Historical Interest as a tool for identifying potential historic districts and Historically Significant Structures. These properties are outside of established historic districts and have been identified as resources for understanding the City’s historic built environment. While the properties on this list are not Qualified Historic Structures, they are good examples of an identifiable architectural styles and buildings that are associated with the residential, institutional, industrial, or commercial development of Anaheim or the region. Structures of Historical Interest are typically over 50 years old, but structures of less than 50 years old may be added to the list at the Planning Department’s discretion if they are exceptionally interesting and merit tracking. THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CITYWIDE Structures of Historical Interest Total Structures: 100 Revised 6/14/2016 49 Address Zip Code Estimated Year Surveyed 107 S Adams St. 92802 1941 701 S Amstutz Ave. 92802 1906 702 S Amstutz Ave. 92802 1920 716 S Amstutz Ave. 92802 1941 883 S Anaheim Blvd. 92805 1929 900 S Anaheim Blvd. 92805 1914 950 S Anaheim Blvd. 92805 1946 222 W Ball Rd. 92805 1935 3223 W Ball Rd. 92804 1919 3233 W Ball Rd. 92804 1935 112 N Berniece Dr. 92801 1912 X 2010 W Broadway 92804 1922 2346 W Broadway 92804 1930 2420 W Broadway 92804 1920 2660 W Broadway 92804 1932 1204 N Brookhurst St. 92801 1920 1313 N Brookhurst St. 92801 1914 660 S Brookhurst St. 92804 1911 1408 E Burton St. 92805 1930 1472 E Burton St. 92805 1919 2019 E Center St. 92806 1915 1593 W Cerritos Ave. 92802 1919 2445 W Cerritos Ave. 92804 1930 805 S Citron St. 92805 1912 875 S Citron St. 92805 1914 1219 W Crone Ave. 92802 1906 1303 W Crone Ave. 92802 1921 1307 W Crone Ave. 92802 1910 X 1311 W Crone Ave. 92802 1910 1409 W Crone Ave. 92802 1912 1415 W Crone Ave. 92802 1908 1442 N Dale Ave. 92801 1900 801 S Dale Ave. 92804 1917 807 S Dale Ave. 92804 1927 1207 W Damon Ave. 92802 1922 1311 W Damon Ave. 92802 1920 1114 W Diamond St. 92801 1929 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CITYWIDE Structures of Historical Interest Total Structures: 100 Revised 6/14/2016 50 Address Zip Code Estimated Year Surveyed 1233 W Diamond St. 92801 1928 510 N Dwyer Dr. 92801 1963 837 S East St. 92805 1911 X 733 S Euclid St. 92802 1948 1349 N Gilbert St. 92801 1915 1211 E La Palma Ave. 92805 1942 1321 E La Palma Ave. 92805 1928 1431 E La Palma Ave. 92805 1926 1441 E La Palma Ave. 92805 1918 1547 E La Palma Ave. 92805 1910 2465 W La Palma Ave. 92801 1930 853 S Lemon St. 92805 1924 1015 N Liberty Ln. 92805 1941 1133 N Liberty Ln. 92805 1910‐1920 241 S Loara St. 92802 1946 2221 S Loara St. 92802 1914 1557 W Mable St. 92802 1910 645 S Magnolia Ave. 92804 1953‐54 1401 N Miller St. 92806 1947 2983 E Miraloma Ave. 92806 1940 3233 E Miraloma Ave. 92806 1935 643 S Nutwood St. 92804 1926 815 S Nutwood St. 92804 1932 907 S Nutwood St. 92804 1931 1246 S Nutwood St. 92804 1922 1413 S Nutwood St. 92804 1928 1546 S Nutwood St. 92804 1933 1767 W Orange Ave. 92804 1920 2020 W Orange Ave. 92804 1927 2820 W Orange Ave. 92804 1912 1106 W Pearl St. 92801 1921 1224 W Pearl St. 92801 1924 1471 N Placentia Ave. 92806 1927 715 S Pythias Ave. 92802 1922 719 S Pythias Ave. 92802 1924 808 S Ramblewood Dr.92804 1890‐1891 123 N Rio Vista St. 92806 1924 Revised 6/14/2016 THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CITYWIDE Structures of Historical Interest Total Structures: 100 51 Address Zip Code Estimated Year Surveyed 502 S Rio Vista St. 92806 1930 557 S Rio Vista St. 92806 1927 1024 W Romneya Dr. 92801 1910 6130 E Santa Ana Canyon Rd. 92807 1905 1252 E Santa Ana St. 92805 1925 1516 E Santa Ana St. 92805 1915 1616 E Santa Ana St. 92805 1906 1707 E Santa Ana St. 92805 1900 3534 W Savanna St. 92804 1933 1615 E South St. 92805 1935 1704 E South St. 92805 1914 2327 E South St. 92806 1921 516 S State College Blvd. 92806 1905 975 S State College Blvd. 92806 1921 X 564 S Sunkist St. 92806 1923 202 N Tustin Ave. 92807 1932 523 W Victor Ave. 92801 1911 631 S Walnut St. 92802 1913 856 S Walnut St. 92802 1910 900 S Walnut St. 92802 1929 1315 S Walnut St. 92802 1923 928 S Webster Ave. 92804 1927 415 N West St. 92801 1888 623 S Western Ave. 92804 1925 828 S Western Ave. 92804 1917 1320 W Westmont Dr. 92801 1920 APPENDIX E GEOTECHNICAL REPORT Geotechnical EngineeringExploration and Analysis Proposed Starwood Element Hotel200 W. Alro WayAnaheim, California Prepared for: Singod Investors VI, LLC Newport Beach, California September 6, 2016Project No. 2G-1607005-R _________________________________________________________________________ GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. TABLE OF CONTENTS GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS PROPOSED STARWOOD ELEMENT HOTEL200 W. ALRO WAYANAHEIM, CALIFORNIAPROJECT NO. 2G-1607005-R Description Page No. 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES.................................................................................................. 1 2.0 SITES AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION.......................................................................... 1 2.1 Site Description................................................................................................... 1 2.2 Proposed Preliminary Project Description........................................................... 2 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION .................................................................................... 2 3.1 Subsurface Exploration....................................................................................... 2 3.2 Subsurface Conditions........................................................................................ 3 3.3 Percolation Testing............................................................................................. 4 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING............................................................................................... 5 5.0 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS .......................................................................... 7 5.1 Active Fault Zones.............................................................................................. 7 5.2 Seismic Hazard Zones........................................................................................ 7 5.3 Landslide Hazards.............................................................................................. 7 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS............................................................... 8 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations............................................................................ 8 6.2 Site Development Recommendations.................................................................. 9 6.3 Construction Considerations..............................................................................12 6.4 Foundation Recommendations ..........................................................................14 6.5 Basement Floor Slab (Below grade Parking)......................................................16 6.6 Retaining Wall Recommendations .....................................................................176.7 Pavement Recommendations............................................................................18 6.8 Recommended Construction Materials Testing Services ...................................20 6.9 Basis of Report ..................................................................................................20 7.0 REFERENCES..............................................................................................................21 APPENDICESAppendix A – Figure (6), Boring Logs (7), Liquefaction Analysis (1), Boring Permit and Right of Way Construction PermitAppendix B – Field ProceduresAppendix C – Laboratory Testing and ClassificationAppendix D – General Information (Modified Guideline Specifications) and Important Information About Your Geotechnical Report _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING EXPLORATION AND ANALYSIS PROPOSED STARWOOD ELEMENT HOTEL200 W. ALRO WAYANAHEIM, CALIFORNIAPROJECT NO. 2G-1607005-R 1.0 SCOPE OF SERVICES This report provides the results of the Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis that Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. (“Giles”) conducted regarding the proposed development. The Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and Analysis included several separate, but related, service areas referenced hereafter as the Geotechnical Subsurface Exploration Program, Geotechnical Laboratory Services, and Geotechnical Engineering Services. The scope of each service area was narrow and limited, as directed by our client and in consideration of the proposed project. The scope of each service area is briefly explained in this report. The scope of work performed for this report was consistent with the scope of work outlined within Proposal No. 2GP-1607011. The scope of services authorized for this project included a visual site reconnaissance, subsurface exploration, field and laboratory testing, and a geotechnical engineering analysis to provide criteria for preparing the design of the foundation and floor slab for the proposed development. Geotechnical-related recommendations are also provided for the proposed parking development. Site preparation recommendations are also given; however, those recommendations are only preliminary since the means and methods of site preparation will depend on factors that were unknown when this report was prepared. Those factors include the weather before and during construction, the water table at the time of construction, subsurface conditions that are exposed during construction, and finalized details of the proposed development. 2.0 SITES AND PROJECT DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Description The new Starwood Element Hotel will be constructed at the site of an existing two story building (formerly occupied by Bergstroms Children Stores) located at 200 W. Alro Way, Anaheim, California and on a small vacant lot to the north of this address. Alro Way separates the two properties (building property and vacant lot). The existing building is a concrete tilt up structure with a loading dock areaand is surrounded by paved parking stalls and a driveway. The entire site is bounded on the north and east by the Interstate 5-Freeway, and on the south and east by ongoing construction (Country Inn and Suites) with Clementine Street and Manchester Avenue further to the south and east. Our review of the ALTA/ACSM Land Title Survey prepared by Hahn and Associated, Inc. for the site indicates a relatively level site with elevations that ranged from about Elevation 141.0 feet to 142.0within the vacant lot and Elevations of 142.0 to 146.0 to the within the existing building area. The sitedrains by sheet flow to Alro Way. Vegetation within the property within building area includes landscape areas covered with grasses,shrubs and small trees, while the vacant dirt lot included shrubs and trees along the southeasterly end of the property. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 2 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Other existing site improvements include asphaltic concrete driveway and parking stalls, concrete walkways, concrete gutters, block walls along the easterly, southerly and westerly property lines, andunderground utilities. 2.2 Proposed Preliminary Project Description The Site Plan provided to us, prepared by Gene Fong Associates, indicated that the existing building (formerly Bergstrom Children Stores) will be demolished for the construction of a new five-story hotel building (Starwood Element Hotel) with one below grade parking level (full basement) to be located within the southwesterly and southern portion of the site. The vacant lot will be used for additional surface parking. For the purpose of this analysis, we have assumed the basement grade will be about 12 feet below existing grade. Other site improvements include a pool and pool deck area, paved parking, concrete walkways, atrash enclosure, a ramp leading to the basement parking, new pavement and landscape areas. At the time of this geotechnical investigation, design loadings and/or proposed structural conditions were not available for our review. We estimate that the maximum building loads will be on the order of300 to 400 kips for interior columns and 6 to 8 kips per foot for walls. When design loading conditions are final, we should be notified to re-evaluate the conclusions and recommendations contained in this report. The structure is anticipated to be concrete masonry at ground floor and basement level and Type 111 A for floor levels 2 to 5. The traffic loading for the driveway and parking lot is understood to predominantly consist of automobiles with occasional heavy trucks resulting from deliveries and trash collection. Pavement designs are based on a 20-year design period. The parking lot pavement sections have been designed on the basis of a Traffic Index (TI) of 4.0 for the automobile traffic parking stalls (light duty) and a TI of 5.5 for automobile drive lane areas (medium duty). 3.0 SUBSURFACE EXPLORATION 3.1 Subsurface Exploration Prior to drilling, a Well/Boring Permit (Permit #1538) was obtained from Anaheim Public Utilities. In addition, a Right of Way Construction Permit (Permit # RCP2016-12105) was obtained from the City of Anaheim for work to be performed within the vacant lot area (property owned by the City of Anaheim). The subsurface exploration consisted of the drilling of five (5) test borings (B-1 to B-5) to depths of approximately 5 to 51-½ feet below existing ground surface utilizing a hollow stem drill rigadjacent to the existing building and two (2) hand auger test borings (B-6 and B-7) within the vacant lot. The approximate test boring locations are shown in the Test Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). The Test Boring Location Plan and Test Boring Logs (Records of Subsurface Exploration) are enclosed in Appendix A. Field and laboratory test procedures and results are enclosed in Appendix B and C, respectively. The terms and symbols used on the Test Boring Logs are defined on the General Notes in Appendix D. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 3 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Our subsurface exploration included the collection of relatively undisturbed samples of subsurface soil materials for laboratory testing purposes. Bulk samples consisted of composite soil materials obtained at selected depth intervals from the boring. Relatively undisturbed samples were collected using a 3-inch outside-diameter, modified California split-spoon soil sampler (CS) lined with 1-inch high brass rings. The sampler was driven with successive 30-inch drops of a hydraulically operated,140-pound automatic trip hammer. Blow counts for each 6-inch driving increment were recorded on the exploration logs. The central portions of the driven core samples were placed in sealed containers and transported to our laboratory for testing. Where deemed appropriate, standard split-spoon tests (SS), also called Standard Penetration Test (SPT), were also performed at selected depth intervals in accordance with the American Society for Testing Materials (ASTM) Standard Procedure D 1586. This method consists of mechanically driving an unlined standard split-barrel sampler 18 inches into the soil with successive 30-inch drops of the 140-pound automatic trip hammer. Blow counts for each 6-inch driving increment were recorded on the exploration logs. The number of blows required to drive the standard split-spoon sampler for the last 12 of the 18 inches was identified as the uncorrected standard penetration resistance (N). Disturbed soil samples from the unlined standard split-spoon samplers were placed in glass jars and transported to our laboratory for testing. A Dynamic Cone Penetration (DCP) test was also performed within Test Borings B-6 and B-7 in conformance with ASTM STP 399. The number of hammer-blows required to drive the cone is an indication of the soil strength and density, and is defined as the N’-value, which is relatively the same as the Standard Penetration Resistance N-value. 3.2 Subsurface Conditions The subsurface conditions as subsequently described have been simplified somewhat for ease of report interpretation. A more detailed description of the subsurface conditions at the test boring locations is provided by the logs of the test borings enclosed in Appendix B of this report. PavementExisting pavement encountered within Test Borings B-1 to B-5 consisted of approximately 5 ½ to 6 inches of asphaltic concrete underlain by approximately 3 to 4 inches of aggregate base. Based on our visual observation, the existing pavement is considered to be in fair condition. Soil Possible fill and fill was encountered within the test borings to depths of approximately 3 to 4-½ feet below existing grade and consisted generally of moist, very loose to medium dense in relative density silty sand. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 4 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Native soils (alluvial deposits) encountered underneath the possible fill and fill generally consisted of damp to moist, very loose to dense silty sand and sand, and very moist, firm to stiff sandy clay. The finer soils (clay) were encountered at depths of about 25 to 45 feet within Test Boring B-3. Groundwater Groundwater was not encountered during our subsurface investigation to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet). The historical high groundwater depth for the subject site is greater than 50 feet below the surface based on our review of the pertinent California Division of Mines and Geology (CDMG) Seismic Hazard Zone report for the Anaheim Quadrangle Fluctuations of the groundwater table, localized zones of perched water, and rise in soil moisture content should be anticipated during and after the rainy season. Irrigation of landscape areas on or adjacent to the site can also cause fluctuations of local or shallow perched groundwater levels. 3.3 Percolation Testing It is our understanding that an on-site below grade storm water infiltration system is being considered for the site. Two percolation tests were conducted at the locations requested by the civil engineer(Figure 1) and involved the drilling of test borings utilizing a hollow-stem auger drill rig with an outside diameter of approximately 8 inches to depths of about 5 feet below existing grade. Within the drilled test holes gravel about 2 inches in thickness was placed at the bottom of each of the test holes, then a two-inch diameter perforated pvc pipe was installed inside each of the borings and pea gravel was used as filter pack around the outside diameter of the pipe. Testing involved presoaking the test holes and subsequently filling the test holes with water, and recording the drop in the water surface with time. The approximate locations of the percolation tests are shown on the attached Figure 1. Soils encountered in the bottom of the percolation test holes were comprised generally of silty sandand sand. The infiltration test procedure outlined in the Orange County Technical Guidance Document was used as a guide in our percolation testing. A summary of the results of the percolation tests is provided in Table 1 below. The subsoils at the tested depths are generally sandy soils and indicated 2 consecutive measurements greater than 6 inches of water seeping away in less than 25 minutes. Therefore the tests were run for an additional hour with measurements taken every 5 to 10 minutes depending on the actual rates and refilling after every reading. The drop in water level over time is the pre-adjusted percolation rate at the test location. The pre-adjusted percolation rates were reduced to account for the discharge of water from both the sides and bottom of the boring. The formula below was used to calculate for the infiltration rate. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 5 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Where: r is the radius of the test hole (in) Havg is the average head height over the time interval The calculated infiltration rates were adjusted to reflect a factor safety (FS) of 2 applied to the rates obtained from the infiltration test results and are summarized below. TABLE 1 – PERCOLATION TEST RESULTS Test Hole Test Depth1(feet)Pre-AdjustedPercolation Rate (in/hr)Infiltration Rate 2(in/hr)Soil Type B-5 5.0±54.7 1.2 Silty SandB-6 5.0±157.0 6.7 Sand1) Depth is referenced to the existing surface grade at the test location.2) Reflects FS of 2 It should be noted that the infiltration rate of the site soils represents a specific area and depth tested and may fluctuate throughout other parts of the site. 4.0 LABORATORY TESTING Several laboratory tests were performed on selected samples considered representative of those encountered in order to evaluate the engineering properties of on-site soils. No chemical analyses for environmental consideration have been conducted on the soils obtained during our subsurface exploration. The following are brief description of our laboratory test results. In Situ Moisture and DensityTests were performed on select samples from the test borings to determine the subsoils dry density and natural moisture contents in accordance with Test Method ASTM 2216-05. The results of these tests are included in the Test Boring Logs enclosed in Appendix A. Sieve Analysis Sieve Analyses including Passing No. 200 were performed on selected samples from various depths within Test Borings B-3, B-5 and B-6 to assist in soil classification. These tests were performed in accordance with Test Method ASTM D 1140-00 (Reapproved 2006). The results of the sieve analyses are graphically presented as Figure 2 and passing no. 200 results are presented in Test Boring Logs, Appendix A. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 6 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Expansive Potential To evaluate the expansive potential of the near surface soils encountered during our subsurface exploration, a composite sample collected from Test Boring B-1 (1 to 5 feet) was subjected to Expansive Index (EI) testing in accordance with Test Method ASTM D 4829-08a. The result of our expansion index (EI) test indicates that the near surface sample has a very low expansion potential(EI=2).Direct Shear The angle of internal friction and cohesion was determined for a relatively undisturbed soil sample collected from Test Boring B-1. This test was performed in general accordance with Test Method No. ASTM D 3080-98. Three specimens were prepared for the test. The test specimens were artificially saturated, and then sheared under various normal loads. Results are graphically presented as Figure 3 in Appendix A. Consolidation Test Settlement predictions under anticipated loads were made on the basis of one-dimensional consolidation tests. These tests were performed in general conformance with Test Method ASTM D 2435 and ASTM D5333. Loads were applied in a geometric progression by doubling the previous load, and the resulting deformations were recorded at selected time intervals. The test samples were saturated at anticipated foundation pressures to evaluate the effect of a sudden increase in moisture content. The data obtained from the consolidation tests was used in estimating the amount of settlement for the planned building. The results of consolidation tests are graphically presented as Figures 4 to 6 in Appendix A. Soluble Sulfate Analysis and Soil Corrosivity A representative sample of the near surface soils which may contact shallow buried utilities and structural concrete was performed to determine the corrosion potential for buried ferrous metal conduits and the concentrations present of water soluble sulfate which could result in chemical attack of cement. The following table presents the results of our laboratory testing. Parameter B-11 to 5 feet pH 8.52Chloride105 ppmSulfate0.0240%Resistivity 2,700 ohm-cm The chloride content of the near-surface soils was determined for a selected sample in accordance with California Test Method No. 422. The results of this test indicated that tested soil has a Lowexposure to chloride. The results of limited in-house testing of soil pH and resistivity were determined in accordance with California Test Method No. 643 and indicated that site soil is strongly alkaline with respect to pH. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 7 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. These test results have been evaluated in accordance with criteria established by the Cast Iron Pipe Research Association, Ductile Iron Pipe Research Association, the American Concrete Institute and the National Association of Corrosion Engineers. The test results on a near surface bulk sample from the site generally indicate that tested soils possess a moderate corrosion potential when in contact with ferrous materials. We recommend that a corrosion engineer review these results in order to provide specific corrosion protection as well as other protection for other buried metal materials. Corrosivity testing also included determination of the concentrations of water-soluble sulfates present in the tested soil sample. Our laboratory test data indicated that near surface soils contain approximately 0.0240 percent of water soluble sulfates. Based on the 2013 California Building Code (CBC), concrete that may be exposed to sulfate containing soils shall comply with the provisions of ACI 318-05, Section 4.3. Therefore, according to Table 4.3.1 of the ACI 318-05, a negligible exposure to sulfate can be expected for concrete placed in contact with the on-site soils. No special sulfate resistant cement is considered necessary for concrete which will be in contact with the tested on-site soils. 5.0 GEOLOGIC AND SEISMIC HAZARDS 5.1 Active Fault Zones The project site is located in the highly seismic Southern California region within the influence of several fault systems. However, the site does not lie within the boundaries of an Earthquake Fault Zone as defined by the State of California in the Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Act. 5.2 Seismic Hazard Zones Our review of the published Seismic Hazard Evaluation Report for the Anaheim Quadrangle (within which the subject site is located) indicates that the site is not located within a designated Liquefaction Hazard Zone. Accordingly, a liquefaction analysis is not deemed necessary. General types of ground failures that might occur as a consequence of severe ground shaking typically include landsliding, ground subsidence, ground lurching and shallow ground rupture. The probability of occurrence of each type of ground failure depends on the severity of the earthquake, distance from faults, topography, subsoils and groundwater conditions, in addition to other factors. Based on our subsurface exploration and seismic designation for this site, all of the above effects of seismic activity are considered unlikely at the site. 5.3 Landslide Hazards The site does not lie within the designated Landslide Hazard Zone based on our review of the published Seismic Hazard Evaluation Report for the Anaheim Quadrangle. Since the subject site is not located near unstable slope, mitigation of landslide hazards is not necessary for the site. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 8 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS Conditions imposed by the proposed development have been evaluated on the basis of the assumed floor elevation and engineering characteristics of the subsurface materials encountered during our subsurface investigation and their anticipated behavior both during and after construction. Conclusions and recommendations presented for the design of foundations and floor slab, along with site preparation recommendations and construction considerations are discussed in the following sections of this report. From a soils engineering point of view, the subject property is considered geotechnically suitable for the proposed new improvements provided the following recommendations are incorporated in the design and construction of the project. We recommend that Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. be involved in the review of the grading and foundation plans for the site. Based on the results of our review, modifications to our recommendations may be warranted. Effect of Proposed Grading and Construction on Adjacent Property It is our opinion that the proposed construction and grading will be safe against geotechnical hazards from landslides, settlement, or slippage provided grading and construction are performed in compliance with the city and local codes and in accordance with the recommendations presented herein. 6.1 Seismic Design Considerations Faulting/Seismic Design Parameters Research of available maps published by the California Geological Survey (CGS) indicates that the subject site is not located within an Alquist-Priolo Earthquake Fault Zone. The potential for fault rupture through the site is, therefore, considered to be low. The site may however be subject to strong groundshaking during seismic activity. The proposed structure should be designed in accordance with the current version of the 2013 California Building Code (CBC) and applicable local codes. Based upon the encountered subsurface soils, a Site Class D is recommended for design. According to the maps of known active fault near-source zones the Puente Hills (Coyote Hills), San Joaquin Hills and Elsinore (W+GI+T+J+CM) faults are the closest known active faults and are located about 4.4, 7.9 and 9.0 miles, respectively, from the site. The Elsinore fault would probably generate the most severe site ground motions at the site with an anticipated maximum moment magnitude (Mw) of 7.85. Within the International Code Council’s 2012 International Building Code (IBC), the five-percent damped design spectral response accelerations at short periods, SDS, and at 1-second period, SD1,are used to determine the seismic design base shear. These parameters, which are a function of the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 9 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. site’s seismicity and soil, are also used as parts of triggers for other code requirements. The following values are determined by using the USGS published U.S. Seismic Design Maps program based upon the 2013 CBC referenced ASCE 7 (with July 2013 errata). IBC 2012/ CBC 2013, Earthquake LoadsSite Class Definition (Table 1613.3.2)DMapped Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, Ss (Figure 1613.3.1 (1) for 0.2 second)1.500Mapped Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, S1 (Figure 1613.3.1 (2) for 1.0 second)0.550Site Coefficient, Fa (Table 1613.3.3 (1) short period) 1.0Site Coefficient, Fv (Table 1613.3.3 (2) 1-second period)1.5Adjusted Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SMS (Eq. 16-37) 1.500Adjusted Maximum Considered Earthquake Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SM1 (Eq. 16-38) 0.825Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SDS (Eq. 16-39)1.000Design Spectral Response Acceleration Parameter, SD1 (Eq. 16-40)0.550 Liquefaction Our review of the published Seismic Hazard Evaluation Report for the Anaheim Quadrangle (where the subject site is located) indicates that the site is not located within a designated liquefaction hazard zone. Additionally, the historic high groundwater at the site vicinity is greater than 50 feet below grade. Dynamic Dry Settlement Seismically – induced settlement or densification of dry or moist, cohesionless soils can be an effect related to earthquake ground motion. These type of settlements are typically most damaging when the settlements are differential in nature across the length of structures. We performed a seismically induced settlement analysis on the soil profile at Test Boring B-3 using a computer program Liquefypro (version 5) developed by Civil Tech Software. Based on our analysis, the anticipated dry seismic induced settlement at the site is about 0.82 inch. Differential seismic settlement is estimated to be about ½ inch over a 30 foot span. 6.2 Site Development Recommendations The following recommendations for site development have been based upon the assumed floorelevation and foundation bearing grades and the conditions encountered at the test boring locations. Site Clearing All structural materials associated with the existing building, including footings and floor slabs, should be removed from the site. Clearing operations should also include the removal of all existing structural features such as asphaltic concrete pavement, and concrete walkways within the area of the Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 10 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. proposed new building. Existing pavement within areas of proposed development should be removed or processed to a maximum 3-inch size and stockpiled for use as compacted fill or stabilizing material for the new development. Processed asphalt may be used as fill, sub-base course material, or subgrade stabilization material beyond the building perimeter. Processed concrete or existing base may be used as fill, sub-base course material, or subgrade stabilization material both within and outside of the building perimeter. Clean existing base may be reused as base for the new pavement. Due to the moisture sensitivity and variable support characteristics of the on-site soils, the pavement is recommended to remain in-place as long as possible to help protect the subgrade from construction traffic disturbance.Should any unusual soil conditions or subsurface structures be encountered during demolition operations or during grading, they should be brought to the immediate attention of the project geotechnical consultant for corrective recommendations.Existing UtilitiesAll existing utilities should be located. Utilities that are not reused should be capped off and removed or properly abandoned in-place in accordance with local codes and ordinances. The excavations made for removed utilities that are in the influence zone of new construction are recommended to be backfilled with structural compacted fill. Underground utilities, which are to be reused or abandoned in-place, are recommended to be evaluated by the structural engineer and utility backfill is recommended to be evaluated by the geotechnical engineer, to determine their potential effect on the new development. If any existing utilities are to be preserved, construction operations must be carefully performed so as not to disturb or damage the existing utility. Building Area With Full-Basement We have assumed that the bottom of the subterranean level will be about 12 feet below existing grade. Based on that assumed floor level, it is expected that the bottom of the excavation for the subterranean level will expose generally medium dense native materials and wide-spread over-excavation of these materials is not expected. The soils exposed at the basement excavation should be examined by the geotechnical engineer to confirm they are suitable for building support. Any unsuitable soil or soils disturbed during excavation of the subterranean garage and/or demolition of the existing improvements should be removed and stockpiled for future use. The exposed surfaces to remain in place should be scarified to an approximate depth of about 12 inches, moisture conditionedto slightly above the soil’s optimum moisture content and then recompacted to at least 90% of the maximum dry density as determined by Modified Proctor (ASTM D-1557). This recommended moisture treatment and soil improvement should be verified by the geotechnical engineer. Should any shallow footings be required for this project, it is recommend that the existing soils beneath and at least 5 feet beyond the footing limits be over-excavated to a depth of at least 3 feet below the bottom of the foundation. This soil over-excavation should be extended in depth, where necessary, to remove any existing fill. The soils exposed at the base of this over-excavation should be scarified to a depth of about 12 inches, moisture conditioned and compacted as recommended above. The over-excavated area may then be backfilled with very low expansive (EI<21) engineered fill. All grading operations should be observed by a representative of the geotechnical engineer. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 11 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Proofroll and Compact Subgrade Following site clearing, the subgrades within the proposed pavement areas should be proofrolled in the presence of the geotechnical engineer with appropriate rubber-tire mounted heavy construction equipment or a loaded truck to detect very loose/soft yielding soil which should be removed to a stable subgrade. Due to the presence of some very loose soils, localized over-excavation is anticipated to be necessary. Following proofrolling and completion of any necessary over-excavation, the subgrade should be scarified to a minimum depth of 12 inches, moisture conditioned andrecompacted to at least 90 percent of the Modified Proctor (ASTM D1557-00) maximum density. Theupper 1 foot of the pavement subgrade should have minimum in-place density of at least 95% of the maximum dry density. Low areas and excavations may then be backfilled in lifts with suitable very low expansive (EI less than 21) structural compacted fill. The selection, placement and compaction of structural fill should be performed in accordance with the project specifications. The Guide Specifications included in Appendix D (Modified Proctor) of this report are recommended to be used, at a minimum, as an aid in developing the project specifications. The floor slab subgrade may need to be recompacted prior to slab construction due to weather and equipment traffic effects on the previously compacted soil. Positive drainage devices such as sloped concrete flatwork, earth swales and sheet flow gradients in landscape area and surface drain system should be designed for the site. The drainage system should drain to a suitable discharge area. The purpose of this drainage system is to reduce water infiltration into the subgrade soils and to direct water away from buildings and site improvements. All utility trench backfill should be placed in lifts no greater than 12 inches in thickness, moisture conditioned and then compacted in place to at least 90 percent of the soil’s maximum density. A representative of the project geotechnical engineer should probe and test the backfills to document adequacy of compaction. Reuse of On-site Soil On-site material may be reused as structural compacted fill provided they do not contain oversized materials and significant quantities of organic matter or other deleterious materials. Care should be used in controlling the moisture content of the soils to achieve proper compaction for load bearing. All subgrade soil compaction as well as the selection, placement and compaction of new fill soils should be performed in accordance with the project specifications under engineering controlled conditions. Import Structural Fill Any soils imported to the site for use as structural fill should consist of very low expansive soils (EI less than 21). Material designated for import should be submitted to the project geotechnical engineer no less than three working days for evaluation. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 12 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. In addition to expansion criteria, soils imported to the site should exhibit adequate shear strength characteristics for the recommended allowable soil bearing pressure; soluble sulfate content and corrosivity; and pavement support characteristics. Subgrade Protection The near surface soils that are expected to comprise the subgrade are sensitive to water. Unstable soil conditions will develop if these soils are exposed to moisture increases or are disturbed (rutted) by construction traffic. The site should be graded to prevent water from ponding within construction areas and/or flowing into excavations. Accumulated water must be removed immediately along with any unstable soil. Foundation concrete should be placed and excavations backfilled as soon as possible to protect the bearing grade. The degree of subgrade instability and associated remedial construction is dependent, in part, upon precautions taken by the contractor to protect the subgrade during site development. Silt fences or other appropriate erosion control devices should be installed in accordance with local, state and federal requirements at the perimeter of the development areas to control sediment from erosion. Since silt fences or other erosion control measures are temporary structures, careful and continuous monitoring and periodic maintenance to remove accumulated soil and/or replacement should be expected. Fill Placement Material for engineered fill should be select free of organic material, debris, and other deleterious substances, and should not contain fragments greater than 3 inches in maximum dimension. On-site excavated soils that meet these requirements may be used to backfill the excavated building pad and pavement areas. All fill should be placed in 8-inch-thick maximum loose lifts, moisture conditioned and then compacted in place to at least 90 percent of the Modified Proctor maximum density in accordance with theenclosed “Guide Structural Fill Specifications”. A representative of the project geotechnical engineershould be present on-site during grading operations to verify proper placement and compaction of all fill, as well as to verify compliance with the other geotechnical recommendations presented herein. 6.3 Construction Considerations Construction Dewatering As mentioned previously, groundwater was not encountered during our subsurface exploration to the maximum depth explored (51.5 feet). However, the site may be susceptible to the development of shallow perched water conditions. In the event that shallow perched water is encountered, filter sump pumps placed within pits in the bottoms of excavations are expected to be the most feasible method of construction dewatering. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 13 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Soil Excavation Some slope stability problems should be expected in steep, unbraced excavations considering the granular nature of the subsoils. All excavations must be performed in accordance with CAL-OSHA requirements, which is the responsibility of the contractor. Shallow excavations may be adequately sloped for bank stability while deeper excavations or excavations where adequate back sloping cannot be performed may require some form of external support such as shoring or bracing. A temporary excavation up to approximately 12 feet high will be required during construction of the subterranean parking level. The excavation sidewalls are expected to expose fill and native soils. As observed within our borings, the fill and native soils within the depth of the expected excavationconsist generally of loose to firm silty sand and sand. Based on these conditions, temporary excavations may be cut and laid back at a maximum slope ratio of 1.5:1 (horizontal to vertical), in order to maintain temporary stability. However, insufficient space exists to lay back the sidewalls of the temporary excavation for the recommended slope configuration without encroaching into the adjacent property line along the west and south sides of the subterranean parking. Therefore, shoring is expected to be required. Temporary Shoring There are several shoring techniques available for the proposed excavation (i.e. soldier pile and lagging wall, sheet-pile walls, or secant piles). It is not known at this time what type of shoring is proposed for the site. However, we expect that soldier piles and wood lagging would be the most likely shoring system. The temporary shoring requirements should be determined once the details for the planned retaining wall have been determined. We recommend that the temporary or permanent shoring walls be separate from the building walls. Tiebacks are not deemed suitable for this site since encroachment agreements would be necessary since the tiebacks would extend off-site. For design of cantilevered shoring, a triangular distribution of lateral earth pressure may be used, with a lateral pressure equal to that developed by a fluid with a density of 35 pounds per cubic foot for retained soils with level backfill and no external surcharge loads. The project structural engineer should design the shoring system using a suitable factor of safety (i.e. minimum 1.25 factor of safety for temporary shoring). For design of braced shoring, we recommend the use of rectangular distribution of earth pressure with a uniform pressure equal to 16H in psf, where H is the height of the shoring in feet. For the design of soldier piles (if selected), an allowable lateral bearing value (passive value) of 600pounds per square foot per foot of depth may be assumed for soils below the level of excavation to determine soldier pile depth and spacing. However, passive resistance should be ignored within the upper foot due to possible disturbance. To develop the full lateral value, provisions should be taken to assure firm contact between the soldier piles and the undisturbed soils. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 14 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Minimum clear spacing between piles should be at least two effective pile diameters, sidewall to sidewall. The construction of the shoring system should be monitored continuously and adjacent structures should be observed for any potential lateral and vertical movement. We recommend that the lagging be designed for an equivalent earth pressure of 35 pcf to a maximum value of 400 pounds per square foot. The pressure distribution for the lagging may be assumed to be semi-circular, where the pressure at the soldier piles is 0 and the pressure at the center of the lagging is 400 pounds per square foot. Additionally, the upper one foot of the lagging should be grouted or slurry–filled to assist in diverting surface water from migrating behind the shoring walls. It is extremely difficult to predict accurately the amount of deflection of a shored embankment. It should be realized that some deflection will occur. We estimate that this deflection may be on the order of ½ to 1 inch at the top of the shored embankment. If greater deflection occurs during construction, additional bracing may be necessary to minimize settlement to the adjacent improvements. If it is desired to reduce the deflection of the shoring, a greater lateral earth pressure may be used in the shoring design with an increased stiffness of the system. All soldier pile installations should be observed by the project geotechnical consultant to verify that they are cast against anticipated conditions, that the pile excavations are properly prepared and cleaned out, that the proper dimensions are achieved, and that the proper installation procedures are followed. The shoring to be constructed at the site should be surveyed and monitored for any movement. If any significant movement is observed during shoring and construction operations, it should be brought to the immediate attention of the project geotechnical consultant for appropriate corrective measures. 6.4 Foundation Recommendations Based on the expected soil conditions at the basement foundation level, it is our opinion that the proposed structure may be supported by a shallow foundation system with a maximum allowable soil bearing pressure of 4,000 pounds per square foot (psf) for footings founded at a depth in excess of 10 feet below finish grade. If shallow footings are needed, we recommend that those footings be designed for an allowable soil bearing pressure of 2,500 psf. As noted previously, shallow footings should be underlain by newly placed engineered fill. Minimum foundation widths for walls and columns should be 18 and 24 inches, respectively, for bearing considerations, regardless of actual soil pressure. The maximum bearing values applies to combined dead and sustained live loads. These allowable soil bearing pressures may be increased by one-third for short term wind and/or seismic loads. Reinforcing The design of the foundations as well as determination of the actual quantity of steel reinforcing and the footing dimensions should be performed by the structural engineer. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 15 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Lateral Load Resistance Lateral load resistance will be developed by a combination of friction acting at the base of foundations and slabs and the passive earth pressure developed by footings below grade. Passive pressure and friction may be used in combination, without reduction, in determining the total resistance to lateral loads. A one-third increase in the passive pressure value may be used for short duration wind orseismic loads. A coefficient of friction of 0.40 may be used with dead load forces for footings placed on newly placed compacted fill soil. An allowable passive earth pressure of 275 psf per foot of footing depth (pcf) below the lowest adjacent grade may be used for the sides of footings. Bearing Material Criteria Soil suitable to serve as the foundation bearing grade should exhibit at least a medium dense relative density (N>10) for the 4,000 psf allowable soil bearing pressure. For design and construction estimating purposes, suitable bearing soils are expected to be encountered at nominal foundation depths. Evaluation of the subgrade within the zone of footing influence should be performed using appropriate bearing capacity testing methods and in-situ testing equipment such as dynamic or static cone penetrometers depending upon the material and should typically include testing to a depth of 3 feet below the foundation bearing grade. The actual depth of evaluation may be revised at the discretion of the geotechnical engineer. If unsuitable bearing soils are encountered, they should be recompacted in-place if feasible, or excavated to a suitable bearing soil subgrade and to a lateral extent as defined by Item No. 3 of the enclosed Guide Specifications, with the excavation backfilled with structural compacted fill to develop a uniform bearing grade. As an alternate to backfilling with soil, the over-excavation could be backfilled with a lean concrete slurry with a minimum 28-day compressive strength of 500 psi.Foundation Embedment It is recommended that exterior foundations extend at least 18 inches below the adjacent exterior grade for bearing capacity. Interior footings may be supported at nominal depth below the floor. All footings must be protected against weather and water damage during and after construction, and must be supported within suitable bearing materials. Estimated Foundation Movement Post-construction total and differential settlement of a shallow foundation system designed and constructed in accordance with the recommendations provided in this report are estimated to be less than 1 and ½ inch, respectively, for static conditions. The estimated differential movement is anticipated to result in an angular distortion of less than 0.002 inches per inch on the basis of a minimum clear span of 30 feet. The maximum estimated total and differential movement is considered within tolerable limits for the proposed structure provided it is considered in the structural design. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 16 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Once actual foundation loads are known, that information should be provided to Giles for review. Dependent upon those loads, revisions to the recommendations within this report may be warranted. 6.5 Basement Floor Slab (Below Grade Parking) The basement floor slab subgrade should be prepared in accordance with the appropriate recommendations presented in the Site Development Recommendations section of this report. Foundation, utility trenches and other below-slab excavations should be backfilled with structural compacted fill in accordance with the project specifications. Design The ground floor slab for the below-grade parking of the proposed structure may be designed and constructed as a slab-on-grade supported by a properly prepared subgrade. The floor slab is recommended to be a minimum of 5 inches in thickness to provide adequate cover for the recommended reinforcing. Due to the concentrated loading by moving and parked vehicles, it is recommended the slab be reinforced with at least #3 rebars placed at 18 inches on-center, each way and placed at mid-height in the slab. It is recommended that a structural engineer or architect specify the floor slab thickness, reinforcing, joint details and other parameters. The basement floor slab may also be designed based on a Subgrade Modulus of 175 pci. The floor slab is recommended to be underlain by a 4 inch thick layer of granular material. A minimum 10-mil synthetic sheet should be placed below the floor slab to serve as a vapor retarder where required to protect moisture sensitive floor coverings (i.e. tile, or carpet, etc.). The sheets of the vapor retarder material should be evaluated for holes and/or punctures prior to placement and the edges overlapped and taped. If materials underlying the synthetic sheet contain sharp, angular particles, a layer of sand approximately 2 inches thick or a geotextile should be provided to protect it from puncture. An additional 2-inch thick layer of sand may be needed between the slab and the vapor barrier to promote proper curing. The sand layers above and below the synthetic sheeting may be used as a substitute for the granular material below the slab. Proper curing techniques are recommended to reduce the potential for shrinkage cracking and slab curling. Estimated Movement With proper site preparation and construction observation, the post-construction total and differential settlement are estimated to be less than ½ and ¼ -inch, respectively. The estimated differential movement is anticipated to occur across a span equivalent to one-half of the short dimension of the structure and is expected to be within tolerable levels provided it is considered in the structural design. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 17 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 6.6 Retaining Wall Recommendations The project will include below grade walls for the planned basement and may also include other shallow walls for the ramp areas accessing the below-grade parking. Retaining walls for the basement level can be founded on shallow foundations in accordance with the recommendations presented in this report. Design lateral earth pressure, backfill criteria, and drainage recommendations for walls below grade are presented below. Static Lateral Earth Pressures Retaining walls should be designed to resist the applicable lateral earth pressures. Site soil materials may be used as backfill behind the retaining walls provided they are confirmed to have very low expansive characteristic and allow for a drainage layer as discussed in subsequent paragraphs. For on-site soils and/or imported soils (EI less than 21) to be used as backfill materials, an active earth pressure of 35 pounds per cubic foot (equivalent fluid pressure) should be used assuming a leveladjacent backfill and drained conditions. For walls to be restrained at the top (such as basement walls), an at-rest pressure of 55 pcf should be used for design. All retaining walls should be supplied with a proper subdrain system. All walls should be designed to support any adjacent structural surcharge loads imposed by other nearby walls or footings and vehicles in addition to the above recommended active earth pressure. Pea gravel, crushed rock or clean sand exhibiting a sand equivalent of 30 or greater may also be used for retaining wall backfill. If these materials are used as backfill, the retaining wall may be designed for an active and at rest earth pressures of 30 and 45 pounds per cubic foot (equivalent fluid pressure), respectively. Drainage and Damp-proofing Retaining walls are recommended to be designed for drained earth pressures and therefore,adequate drainage should be provided behind the walls. This can be accomplished by installing subdrains at the base of the walls. Wall footing-drains should consist of a system of filter material and perforated pipe. The perforated pipe system should consist of 4-inch diameter, schedule 40, PVC pipe or equivalent, embedded in 1 cubic foot of Class II Permeable Material (CALTRANS Standard Specifications, latest edition) or equivalent per lineal foot of pipe. Alternatively, ¾-inch open graded gravel or crushed rock enveloped in Mirafi 140 geofabric or equivalent may be used instead of the Class II Permeable Material. The pipe should be placed at the base of the wall, and then routed to a suitable area for discharge of accumulated water. Wall backfill should be protected against infiltration of surface water. Backfill adjacent to walls should be sloped so that surface water drains freely away from the wall and will not pond. Damp-proofing of walls below-grade is recommended especially where moisture control is required by an approved waterproofing compound or covered with similar material to inhibit infiltration of moisture through the walls. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 18 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Wall Backfill Retaining wall backfill behind the drainage layers should consist of very low expansive soils with an E.I. less than 21, as determined by ASTM D 4829-03 method. Wall backfill should not contain organic material, rubble, debris, and rocks or cemented fragments larger than 3 inches in greatest dimension. A 1 foot thick low expansive cohesive layer or pavement should be placed at the surface to help prevent surface water intrusion. A geotextile or filter fabric should be placed between the granular drainage layers and adjacent soils (excavated face or compacted materials) to prevent fines from migrating into the drainage layers. Backfill should be placed in lifts not exceeding 8 inches in thickness, moisture conditioned to slightly above optimum moisture content, and mechanically compacted throughout to at least 90 percent of the maximum dry density as determined by Modified Proctor (ASTM D 1557). Retaining walls should be properly braced prior to placement and compaction of backfill should be performed with extreme care not to damage the walls. Seismic PressurePer the 2013 CBC Section 1803.5.12, retaining walls supporting more than 6 feet of backfill height should be designed to resist the additional earth pressure caused by seismic ground shaking. The planned retaining wall for the site will be greater than 6 feet high and therefore, the seismic lateral pressure must be added to the static lateral pressure distribution for the design of the walls. A seismic lateral pressure of 22.5 pounds per cubic foot (pcf) is recommended for the subject site using the PGAM value of 0.50 (kh) derived from the Maximum Considered Earthquake ground motions based on ASCE 7-10.Where earthquake loads are included in the design, the minimum safety factor for retaining wall sliding and overturning shall be 1.1 (Section 1807.2.3). 6.7 Pavement Recommendations Pavement Subgrades Following completion of the recommended subgrade preparation procedures, the subgrade in areas of new pavement construction are expected to consist of existing on-site soils that exhibit a very lowto low expansion potential. The anticipated subgrade soils are classified as a good subgrade material with estimated R-value of 40 to 50 when properly prepared based on the Unified Soil Classification System designation of SM. An R-value of 40 has been assumed in the preparation of the pavement design. It should however, be recognized that the City of Anaheim may require a specific R-value test to verify the use of the following design. It is recommended that this testing, if required, be conducted following completion of rough grading in the proposed pavement areas so that the R-value test results are indicative of the actual pavement subgrade soils. Alternatively, a minimum code pavement section may be required if a specific R-value test is not performed. To use this R-value, all fill added to the pavement subgrade must have pavement support characteristics at least equivalent to the existing soils, and must be placed and compacted in accordance with the project specifications. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 19 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Asphalt Pavements The following table presents recommended thicknesses for a new flexible pavement structure consisting of asphaltic concrete over a granular base, along with the appropriate CALTRANS specifications for proper materials and placement procedures. An alternate pavement section has been provided for use in parking stall areas due to the anticipated lower traffic intensity in these areas. However, care must be used so that truck traffic is excluded from areas where the thinner pavement section is used, since premature pavement distress may occur. In the event that heavy vehicle traffic cannot be excluded from the specific areas, the pavement section recommended for drive lanesshould be used throughout the parking lot. Pavement recommendations are based upon CALTRANS design parameters for a twenty-year design period. We recommend that the geotechnical engineer monitors and tests subgrade preparation, and that the subgrade be evaluated immediately before pavement construction. Portland Concrete Pavements Portland Cement Concrete pavements are recommended in areas where traffic is concentrated such as the entrance/exit aprons as well as areas subjected to heavy loads such as the trash enclosure loading zone. The preparation of the subgrade soils within concrete pavement areas should be performed as previously described in this report. Portland Cement Concrete pavements in high stress areas are recommended to be at least 6 inches thick containing No. 3 bars at 18-inch on-center both ways placed at mid-height. The pavement should be constructed in accordance with Section 40 of the CALTRANS Standard Specifications. A minimum 4-inch thick layer of base course (CALTRANS Class 2) is recommended below the concrete pavement. This base course should be compacted to at least 95% of the material’s maximum dry density. The maximum joint spacing within all of the Portland Cement Concrete pavements is recommended to be 15 feet or less to control shrinkage cracking. Load transfer reinforcing is recommended at construction joints perpendicular to traffic flow if construction joints are not properly keyed. In this ASPHALT PAVEMENTSMaterialsThickness (inches)CALTRANSSpecificationsParking Stalls(TI=4.0)Drive Lanes(TI=5.5)Asphaltic ConcreteSurface Course (b)1 1 Section 39, (a)Asphaltic ConcreteBinder Course (b)2 2 Section 39, (a)Crushed AggregateBase Course 4 6 Section 26, Class 2 (R-value at least 78)NOTES:(a) Compaction to density between 95 and 100 percent of the 50-Blow Marshall Density(b) The surface and binder course may be combined as a single layer placed in one lift if similar materials are utilized. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 20 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. event, ¾-inch diameter smooth dowel bars, 18 inches in length placed at 12 inches on-center are recommended where joints are perpendicular to the anticipated traffic flow. Expansion joints are recommended only where the pavement abuts fixed objects such as light standard foundations. Tie bars are recommended at the first joint within the perimeter of the concrete pavement area. Tie bars are recommended to be No. 4 bars at 42-inch on-center spacings and at least 48 inches in length. General Considerations Pavement recommendations assume proper drainage and construction monitoring and are based on traffic loads as indicated previously. Pavement designs are based on either PCA or CALTRANSdesign parameters for twenty (20) year design period. However, these designs are also based on a routine pavement maintenance program and significant asphalt concrete pavement rehabilitation after about 8 to 10 years, in order to obtain a reasonable pavement service life. Due to the presence of variable strength on-site soils, some increased pavement maintenance should be expected. 6.8 Recommended Construction Materials Testing Services The report was prepared assuming that Giles will perform Construction Materials Testing (CMT) services during construction of the proposed development. In general, CMT services are recommended (and expected) to at least include observation and testing of foundation and pavement support soil and other construction materials. It might be necessary for Giles to provide supplemental geotechnical recommendations based on the results of CMT services and specific details of the project not known at this time. 6.9 Basis of ReportThis report is based on Giles’ proposal, which is dated July 12, 2016 and is referenced by Giles’ proposal number 2GP-1607011. The actual services for the project varied somewhat from those described in the proposal because of the conditions that were encountered while performing the services and in consideration of the proposed project. This report is strictly based on the project description given earlier in this report. Giles must be notified if any parts of the project description or our assumptions are not accurate so that this report can be amended, if needed. This report is based on the assumption that the facility will be designed and constructed according to the codes that govern construction at the site.The conclusions and recommendations in this report are based on estimated subsurface conditions as shown on the Records of Subsurface Exploration. Giles must be notified if the subsurface conditions that are encountered during construction of the proposed development differ from those shown on the Records of Subsurface Exploration because this report will likely need to be revised. General comments and limitations of this report are given in the appendix. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 21 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. 7.0 REFERENCES American Concrete Institute, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete (ACI 318) and Commentary.www.concrete.org/general/home.asp American Society of Civil Engineers, Geotechnical Special Publication No. 74, Guidelines of Engineering Practice for Braced and Tied-Back Excavations, Geotechnical Institute, 1997. American Society of Testing and Materials International (ASTM) Standards.www.astm.org/Standard/ Blake, 2000, “UBCSEIS, A Computer Program for the Deterministic Prediction of Anticipated Maximum Moment Magnitude and an Anticipated Slip Rote.” Blake, 2000, FRISKP, Version 5.0, A Computer Program for the Probabilistic Estimation of Peck Ground Acceleration from Digitized California Faults. California Building Code, 2013 Edition: Sacramento, CA, California Building Standards Commission, 2 Volumes. California Department of Conservation, California Geological Survey, Fault-Rupture Hazard Zones in California, Special Publication 42, (interim revision) Dated 2007.ftp.consrv.ca.gov/pub/dmg/pubs/sp/Sp42.pdf California Department of Conservation Division of Mine and Geology (CDMG), “Digital Images of Official Maps of Alquist – Priolo Earthquake Fault Zones of California, Southern Region.” California Division of Mines and Geology, 1997, “Seismic Hazard Zone Report For The Anaheim and Newport Beach 7.5 Minute Quadrangles, Orange County, California.” California Division of Mines and Geology, 2008, Guidelines for Evaluating and Mitigating Seismic Hazards in California, Special Publication 117A. Committee on Earthquake Engineering. Liquefaction of Soils During Earthquakes, National Academy Press (1985). National Association of Corrosion Engineers, 1984, Corrosion Basics An Introduction, page 191. NAVFAC DM-7.2, Foundations and Earth Structures, Design Manual 7.2, May 1982. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center, “Development of Improved Procedures for Seismic Design of Buried and Partially Buried Structures”, 2007, Linda Al Atik and Nicholas Sitar, University of California, Berkeley. Preliminary Geotechnical Engineering Exploration and AnalysisProposed Starwood Element HotelAnaheim, CaliforniaProject No. 2G-1607005-RPage 22 _________________________________________________________________________GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Seed, H.B. and Idriss, I.M. (1982), Ground Motions and Soil Liquefaction During Earthquakes, monograph series, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Berkeley, California. Seed, H.B., Idriss, I.M. and Arango, I. (1983) Evaluation of Liquefaction Potential Using Field Performance Data, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 109 (3): 458-482. Southern California Earthquake Center (SCEC), Recommended Procedures for Implementation of DMG Special Publication 117, G.R. Martin and M. Lew, Co-chairs and Editors, March 1999. Terzaghi, K. and Peck, R., Soil Mechanics in Engineering Practice, Second Edition, 1967. Tokimatsu, A. and Seed, H.B., (1987), Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, 113 (8) 861-868.Tokimatsu, K., and Seed, H.B., 1987, Evaluation of Settlements in Sands Due to Earthquake Shaking,Journal of the Geotechnical Engineering Division. Youd, T.L. and Idriss, I.M., editors, “Proceeding of the NCEER Workshop of Evaluation of Liquefaction Resistance of Soils,” Technical Report NCEER-97-0022, December 31, 1997. © Giles Engineering Associates, Inc. 2016 APPENDIX A FIGURES AND TEST BORING LOGS The Test Boring Location Plan contained herein was prepared based upon information supplied by Giles’client, or others, along with Giles’field measurements and observations. The diagram is presented for conceptual purposes only and is intended to assist the reader in report interpretation. The Test Boring Logs and related information enclosed herein depict the subsurface (soil and water) conditions encountered at the specific boring locations on the date that the exploration was performed. Subsurface conditions may differ between boring locations and within areas of the site that were not explored with test borings. The subsurface conditions may also change at the boring locations over the passage of time. APPENDIX B FIELD PROCEDURES The field operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) designation D 420 entitled “Standard Guide for Sampling Rock and Rock” and/or other relevant specifications.Soil samples were preserved and transported to Giles’laboratory in general accordance with the procedures recommended by ASTM designation D 4220 entitled “Standard Practice for Preserving and Transporting Soil Samples.” Brief descriptions of the sampling, testing and field procedures commonly performed by Giles are provided herein. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL FIELD PROCEDURES Test Boring Elevations The ground surface elevations reported on the Test Boring Logs are referenced to the assumed benchmark shown on the Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). Unless otherwise noted, the elevations were determined with a conventional hand-level and are accurate to within about 1 foot. Test Boring Locations The test borings were located on-site based on the existing site features and/or apparent property lines. Dimensions illustrating the approximate boring locations are reported on the Boring Location Plan (Figure 1). Water Level Measurement The water levels reported on the Test Boring Logs represent the depth of “free” water encountered during drilling and/or after the drilling tools were removed from the borehole. Water levels measured within a granular (sand and gravel) soil profile are typically indicative of the water table elevation. It is usually not possible to accurately identify the water table elevation with cohesive (clayey) soils, since the rate of seepage is slow. The water table elevation within cohesive soils must therefore be determined over a period of time with groundwater observation wells. It must be recognized that the water table may fluctuate seasonally and during periods of heavy precipitation. Depending on the subsurface conditions, water may also become perched above the water table, especially during wet periods. Borehole Backfilling Procedures Each borehole was backfilled upon completion of the field operations. If potential contamination was encountered, and/or if required by state or local regulations, boreholes were backfilled with an “impervious” material (such as bentonite slurry). Borings that penetrated pavements, sidewalks, etc. were “capped” with Portland Cement concrete, asphaltic concrete, or a similar surface material. It must, however, be recognized that the backfill material may settle, and the surface cap may subside, over a period of time. Further backfilling and/or re-surfacing by Giles’ client or the property owner may be required. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. FIELD SAMPLING AND TESTING PROCEDURES Auger Sampling (AU) Soil samples are removed from the auger flights as an auger is withdrawn above the ground surface. Such samples are used to determine general soil types and identify approximate soil stratifications. Auger samples are highly disturbed and are therefore not typically used for geotechnical strength testing. Split-Barrel Sampling (SS) – (ASTM D-1586) A split-barrel sampler with a 2-inch outside diameter is driven into the subsoil with a 140-pound hammer free-falling a vertical distance of 30 inches. The summation of hammer-blows required to drive the sampler the final 12-inches of an 18-inch sample interval is defined as the “Standard Penetration Resistance” or N-value is an index of the relative density of granular soils and the comparative consistency of cohesive soils. A soil sample is collected from each SPT interval. Shelby Tube Sampling (ST) – (ASTM D-1587) A relatively undisturbed soil sample is collected by hydraulically advancing a thin-walled Shelby Tube sampler into a soil mass. Shelby Tubes have a sharp cutting edge and are commonly 2 to 5 inches in diameter. Bulk Sample (BS) A relatively large volume of soils is collected with a shovel or other manually-operated tool. The sample is typically transported to Giles’ materials laboratory in a sealed bag or bucket. Dynamic Cone Penetration Test (DC) – (ASTM STP 399) This test is conducted by driving a 1.5-inch-diameter cone into the subsoil using a 15-pound steel ring (hammer), free-falling a vertical distance of 20 inches. The number of hammer-blows required to drive the cone 1¾ inches is an indication of the soil strength and density, and is defined as “N”. The Dynamic Cone Penetration test is commonly conducted in hand auger borings, test pits and within excavated trenches. - Continued - GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Ring-Lined Barrel Sampling – (ASTM D 3550) In this procedure, a ring-lined barrel sampler is used to collect soil samples for classification and laboratory testing. This method provides samples that fit directly into laboratory test instruments without additional handling/disturbance. Sampling and Testing Procedures The field testing and sampling operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Results of the field testing (i.e. N-values) are reported on the Test Boring Logs. Explanations of the terms and symbols shown on the logs are provided on the appendix enclosure entitled “General Notes”. APPENDIX C LABORATORY TESTING AND CLASSIFICATION The laboratory testing was conducted under the supervision of a geotechnical engineer in accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Brief descriptions of laboratory tests commonly performed by Giles are provided herein. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. LABORATORY TESTING AND CLASSIFICATION Photoionization Detector (PID) In this procedure, soil samples are “scanned” in Giles’ analytical laboratory using a Photoionization Detector (PID). The instrument is equipped with an 11.7 eV lamp calibrated to a Benzene Standard and is capable of detecting a minute concentration of certain Volatile Organic Compound (VOC) vapors, such as those commonly associated with petroleum products and some solvents. Results of the PID analysis are expressed in HNu (manufacturer’s) units rather than actual concentration. Moisture Content (w) (ASTM D 2216) Moisture content is defined as the ratio of the weight of water contained within a soil sample to the weight of the dry solids within the sample. Moisture content is expressed as a percentage. Unconfined Compressive Strength (qu) (ASTM D 2166) An axial load is applied at a uniform rate to a cylindrical soil sample. The unconfined compressive strength is the maximum stress obtained or the stress when 15% axial strain is reached, whichever occurs first. Calibrated Penetrometer Resistance (qp) The small, cylindrical tip of a hand-held penetrometer is pressed into a soil sample to a prescribed depth to measure the soils capacity to resist penetration. This test is used to evaluate unconfined compressive strength. Vane-Shear Strength (qs) The blades of a vane are inserted into the flat surface of a soil sample and the vane is rotated until failure occurs. The maximum shear resistance measured immediately prior to failure is taken as the vane-shear strength. Loss-on-Ignition (ASTM D 2974; Method C) The Loss-on-Ignition (L.O.I.) test is used to determine the organic content of a soil sample. The procedure is conducted by heating a dry soil sample to 440°C in order to burn-off or “ash” organic matter present within the sample. The L.O.I. value is the ratio of the weight loss due to ignition compared to the initial weight of the dry sample. L.O.I. is expressed as a percentage. GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. Particle Size Distribution (ASTB D 421, D 422, and D 1140) This test is performed to determine the distribution of specific particle sizes (diameters) within a soil sample. The distribution of coarse-grained soil particles (sand and gravel) is determined from a “sieve analysis,” which is conducted by passing the sample through a series of nested sieves. The distribution of fine-grained soil particles (silt and clay) is determined from a “hydrometer analysis” which is based on the sedimentation of particles suspended in water. Consolidation Test (ASTM D 2435) In this procedure, a series of cumulative vertical loads are applied to a small, laterally confined soil sample. During each load increment, vertical compression (consolidation) of the sample is measured over a period of time. Results of this test are used to estimate settlement and time rate of settlement. Classification of Samples Each soil sample was visually-manually classified, based on texture and plasticity, in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2488-75). The classifications are reported on the Test Boring Logs. Laboratory Testing The laboratory testing operations were conducted in general accordance with the procedures recommended by the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM) and/or other relevant specifications. Results of the laboratory tests are provided on the Test Boring Logs or other appendix enclosures. Explanation of the terms and symbols used on the logs is provided on the appendix enclosure entitled “General Notes.” GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. California Bearing Ratio (CBR) Test ASTM D-1833 The CBR test is used for evaluation of a soil subgrade for pavement design. The test consists of measuring the force required for a 3-square-inch cylindrical piston to penetrate 0.1 or 0.2 inch into a compacted soil sample. The result is expressed as a percent of force required to penetrate a standard compacted crushed stone. Unless a CBR test has been specifically requested by the client, the CBR is estimated from published charts, based on soil classification and strength characteristics. A typical correlation chart is below. APPENDIX D GENERAL INFORMATION GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL COMMENTS The soil samples obtained during the subsurface exploration will be retained for a period of thirty days. If no instructions are received, they will be disposed of at that time. This report has been prepared exclusively for the client in order to aid in the evaluation of this property and to assist the architects and engineers in the design and preparation of the project plans and specifications. Copies of this report may be provided to contractor(s), with contract documents, to disclose information relative to this project. The report, however, has not been prepared to serve as the plans and specifications for actual construction without the appropriate interpretation by the project architect, structural engineer, and/or civil engineer. Reproduction and distribution of this report must be authorized by the client and Giles. This report has been based on assumed conditions/characteristics of the proposed development where specific information was not available. It is recommended that the architect, civil engineer and structural engineer along with any other design professionals involved in this project carefully review these assumptions to ensure they are consistent with the actual planned development. When discrepancies exist, they should be brought to our attention to ensure they do not affect the conclusions and recommendations provided herein. The project plans and specifications may also be submitted to Giles for review to ensure that the geotechnical related conclusions and recommendations provided herein have been correctly interpreted. The analysis of this site was based on a subsoil profile interpolated from a limited subsurface exploration. If the actual conditions encountered during construction vary from those indicated by the borings, Giles must be contacted immediately to determine if the conditions alter the recommendations contained herein. The conclusions and recommendations presented in this report have been promulgated in accordance with generally accepted professional engineering practices in the field of geotechnical engineering. No other warranty is either expressed or implied. Wi t h D u s t Pa l l i a t i v e Wi t h Bi t u m i n o u s Tr e a t m e n t GW G o o d : t r a c t o r , r u b b e r - t i r e d , s t e e l wh e e l o r v i b r a t o r y r o l l e r 12 5 - 1 3 5 A l m o s t n o n e G o o d d r a i n a g e , p er v i o u s Ve r y s t a b l e E x c e l l e n t G o o d F a i r t o p oo r Ex c e l l e n t GP G o o d : t r a c t o r , r u b b e r - t i r e d , s t e e l wh e e l o r v i b r a t o r y r o l l e r 11 5 - 1 2 5 A l m o s t n o n e G o o d d r a i n a g e , p er v i o u s Re a s o n a b l y st a b l e Ex c e l l e n t t o g oo d Po o r t o f a i r P o o r GM G o o d : r u b b e r - t i r e d o r l i g h t sh e e p sf o o t r o l l e r 12 0 - 1 3 5 S l i g h t Po o r d r a i n a g e , se m i p er v i o u s Re a s o n a b l y st a b l e Ex c e l l e n t t o g oo d Fa i r t o p o o r P o o r P o o r t o f a i r GC G o o d t o f a i r : r u b b e r - t i r e d o r sh e e p sf o o t r o l l e r 11 5 - 1 3 0 S l i g h t Po o r d r a i n a g e , im p er v i o u s Re a s o n a b l y st a b l e Go o d G o o d t o f a i r ** Ex c e l l e n t E x c e l l e n t SW G o o d : t r a c t o r , r u b b e r - t i r e d o r vi b r a t o r y r o l l e r 11 0 - 1 3 0 A l m o s t n o n e G o o d d r a i n a g e , p er v i o u s Ve r y s t a b l e G o o d F a i r t o p o o r F a i r t o p oo r Go o d SP G o o d : t r a c t o r , r u b b e r - t i r e d o r vi b r a t o r y r o l l e r 10 0 - 1 2 0 A l m o s t n o n e G o o d d r a i n a g e , pe r v i o u s Re a s o n a b l y st a b l e w h e n de n s e Go o d t o f a i r P o o r P o o r P o o r t o f a i r SM G o o d : r u b b e r - t i r e d o r s h e e p s f o o t ro l l e r 11 0 - 1 2 5 S l i g h t Po o r d r a i n a g e , im p e r v i o u s Re a s o n a b l y st a b l e w h e n de n s e Go o d t o f a i r P o o r P o o r P o o r t o f a i r SC G o o d t o f a i r : r u b b e r - t i r e d o r sh e e p sf o o t r o l l e r 10 5 - 1 2 5 S l i g h t t o me d i u m Po o r d r a i n a g e , im p er v i o u s Re a s o n a b l y st a b l e Go o d t o f a i r F a i r t o p o o r E x c e l l e n t E x c e l l e n t ML G o o d t o p o o r : r u b b e r - t i r e d o r sh e e p s f o o t r o l l e r 95 - 1 2 0 S l i g h t t o me d i u m Po o r d r a i n a g e , im p e r v i o u s Po o r s t a b i l i t y , hi g h d e n s i t y re q ui r e d Fa i r t o p o o r N o t s u i t a b l e P o o r P o o r CL G o o d t o f a i r : s h e e p s f o o t o r r u b b e r - ti r e d r o l l e r 95 - 1 2 0 M e d i u m N o d r a i n a g e , im p er v i o u s Go o d s t a b i l i t y F a i r t o p o o r N o t s u i t a b l e P o o r P o o r OL F a i r t o p o o r : s h e e p s f o o t o r r u b b e r - ti r e d r o l l e r 80 - 1 0 0 M e d i u m t o h i g h P o o r d r a i n a g e , im p e r v i o u s Un s t a b l e , s h o u l d no t b e u s e d Po o r N o t s u i t a b l e N o t s u i t a b l e N o t s u i t a b l e MH F a i r t o p o o r : s h e e p s f o o t o r r u b b e r - ti r e d r o l l e r 70 - 9 5 H i g h Po o r d r a i n a g e , im p e r v i o u s Po o r s t a b i l i t y , sh o u l d n o t b e us e d Po o r N o t s u i t a b l e V e r y p o o r N o t s u i t a b l e CH F a i r t o p o o r : s h e e p s f o o t r o l l e r 8 0 - 1 0 5 V e r y h i g h N o d r a i n a g e , im p e r v i o u s Fa i r s t a b i l i t y , ma y s o f t e n o n ex p an s i o n Po o r t o v e r y po o r No t s u i t a b l e V e r y p o o r N o t s u i t a b l e OH F a i r t o p o o r : s h e e p s f o o t r o l l e r 6 5 - 1 0 0 H i g h No d r a i n a g e , im p e r v i o u s Un s t a b l e , s h o u l d no t b e u s e d Ve r y p o o r N o t s u i t a b l e N o t su i t a b l e No t s u i t a b l e Pt N o t s u i t a b l e Ve r y h i g h F a i r t o p o o r dr a i n a g e Sh o u l d n o t b e us e d No t s u i t a b l e N o t s u i t a b l e N o t su i t a b l e No t s u i t a b l e * " T h e U n i f i e d C l a s s i f i c a t i o n : A p p e n d i x A - C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f S o i l , G r o u p s P e r t a i n i n g t o R o a d s a n d A i r f i e l d s , a n d A p p e n d i x B - C h a r a c t e r i s t i c s o f S o i l G r o u p s P e r t a i n i n g t o E m b a n k m e n t s a n d F o u n d a t i o n s , " T e c h n i c a l M e m o r a n d u m 3 5 7 , U . S . W a t e r w a y s I x p e r i m e n t S t a t i o n , V i c k s b u r g , 1 9 5 3 . ** N o t s u i t a b l e i f s u b j e c t t o f r o s t . G I L E S E N G I N E E R I N G A S S O C I A T E S , I N C . CH A R A C T E R I S T I C S A N D R A T I N G S O F U N I F I E D S O I L S Y S T E M C L A S S E S F O R S O I L C O N S T R U C T I O N * Va l u e a s T e m p o r a r y Pa v e m e n t Cl a s s Co m p a c t i o n Ch a r a c t e r i s t i c s Ma x . D r y De n s i t y St a n d a r d Pr o c t o r (p c f ) Co m p r e s s i b i l i t y an d E x p a n s i o n Dr a i n a g e a n d Pe r m e a b i l i t y Va l u e a s a n Em b a n k m e n t Ma t e r i a l Va l u e a s Su b g r a d e Wh e n N o t Su b j e c t t o Fr o s t Va l u e a s B a s e Co u r s e GILES ENGINEERING ASSOCIATES, INC. GENERAL NOTES SAMPLE IDENTIFICATION All samples are visually classified in general accordance with the Unified Soil Classification System (ASTM D-2487-75 or D-2488-75) DESCRIPTIVE TERM (% BY DRY WEIGHT) PARTICLE SIZE (DIAMETER) Trace: 1-10% Boulders: 8 inch and larger Little: 11-20% Cobbles: 3 inch to 8 inch Some: 21-35% Gravel: coarse - ¾ to 3 inch And/Adjective 36-50% fine – No. 4 (4.76 mm) to ¾ inch Sand: coarse – No. 4 (4.76 mm) to No. 10 (2.0 mm) medium – No. 10 (2.0 mm) to No. 40 (0.42 mm) fine – No. 40 (0.42 mm) to No. 200 (0.074 mm) Silt: No. 200 (0.074 mm) and smaller (non-plastic) Clay: No 200 (0.074 mm) and smaller (plastic) SOIL PROPERTY SYMBOLS DRILLING AND SAMPLING SYMBOLS Dd: Dry Density (pcf) SS: Split-Spoon LL: Liquid Limit, percent ST: Shelby Tube – 3 inch O.D. (except where noted) PL: Plastic Limit, percent CS: 3 inch O.D. California Ring Sampler PI: Plasticity Index (LL-PL) DC: Dynamic Cone Penetrometer per ASTM LOI: Loss on Ignition, percent Special Technical Publication No. 399 Gs: Specific Gravity AU: Auger Sample K: Coefficient of Permeability DB: Diamond Bit w: Moisture content, percent CB: Carbide Bit qp: Calibrated Penetrometer Resistance, tsf WS: Wash Sample qs: Vane-Shear Strength, tsf RB: Rock-Roller Bit qu: Unconfined Compressive Strength, tsf BS: Bulk Sample qc: Static Cone Penetrometer Resistance Note: Depth intervals for sampling shown on Record of (correlated to Unconfined Compressive Strength, tsf) Subsurface Exploration are not indicative of sample PID: Results of vapor analysis conducted on representative recovery, but position where sampling initiated samples utilizing a Photoionization Detector calibrated to a benzene standard. Results expressed in HNU-Units. (BDL=Below Detection Limit) N: Penetration Resistance per 12 inch interval, or fraction thereof, for a standard 2 inch O.D. (1 inch I.D.) split spoon sampler driven with a 140 pound weight free-falling 30 inches. Performed in general accordance with Standard Penetration Test Specifications (ASTM D-1586). N in blows per foot equals sum of N-Values where plus sign (+) is shown. Nc: Penetration Resistance per 1¾ inches of Dynamic Cone Penetrometer. Approximately equivalent to Standard Penetration TestN-Value in blows per foot. Nr: Penetration Resistance per 12 inch interval, or fraction thereof, for California Ring Sampler driven with a 140 pound weight free-falling 30 inches per ASTM D-3550. Not equivalent to Standard Penetration Test N-Value. SOIL STRENGTH CHARACTERISTICS COHESIVE (CLAYEY) SOILS NON-COHESIVE (GRANULAR) SOILS UNCONFINED COMPARATIVE BLOWS PER COMPRESSIVE RELATIVE BLOWS PER CONSISTENCY FOOT (N) STRENGTH (TSF) DENSITY FOOT (N) Very Soft 0 - 2 0 - 0.25 Very Loose 0 - 4 Soft 3 - 4 0.25 - 0.50 Loose 5 - 10 Medium Stiff 5 – 8 0.50 - 1.00 Firm 11 - 30 Stiff 9 – 15 1.00 - 2.00 Dense 31 - 50 Very Stiff 16 – 30 2.00 - 4.00 Very Dense 51+ Hard 31+ 4.00+ DEGREE OF DEGREE OF EXPANSIVE PLASTICITY PI POTENTIAL PI None to Slight 0 - 4 Low 0 - 15 Slight 5 - 10 Medium 15 - 25 Medium 11 - 30 High 25+ High to Very High 31+ APPENDIX F PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT AND EDR REPORT PHASE I ENVIRONMENTAL SITE ASSESSMENT REPORT Commercial Property 200 West Alro Way Anaheim, California 92805 May 6, 2016 Partner Project No. 16-161656.1 Prepared for: Tarsadia Investments 620 Newport Center Drive, 14th Floor Newport Beach, California 92660 2154 Torrance Blvd., Suite 200, Torrance, CA 90501 Phone 800-419--928-7418 May 6, 2016 Mr. Pat Patel Tarsadia Investments 620 Newport Center Drive, 14th Floor Newport Beach, California 92660 Subject: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Commercial Property 200 Alro Way Anaheim, California 92805 Partner Project No. 16-161656.1 Dear Mr. Patel: Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) is pleased to provide the results of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment was performed in general conformance with the scope and limitations as detailed in the ASTM Practice E1527-13 Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process. This assessment included a site reconnaissance as well as research and interviews with representatives of the public, property ownership, site manager, and regulatory agencies. An assessment was made, conclusions stated, and recommendations outlined. We appreciate the opportunity to provide environmental services to you. If you have any questions concerning this report, or if we can assist you in any other matter, please contact me at (714) 397-3103. Sincerely, DRAFT Gavin S. Jones, EP Principal Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page i EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general accordance with the scope of work and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13, the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) and set forth by Tarsadia Investments for the property located at 200 West Alro Way in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (the The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment is designed to provide Tarsadia Investments with an assessment concerning environmental conditions (limited to those issues identified in the report) as they exist at the subject property. Property Description The subject property is located on the south side of Alro Way within a commercial area of Anaheim, California. Please refer to the table below for further description of the subject property: Subject Property Data Address: 200 West Alro Way, Anaheim, California 92805 Historical Address: 1601 South Manchester Avenue Property Use: Commercial Land Acreage (Ac): 1.45 Ac Number of Buildings: One Number of Floors: Two Gross Building Area (SF): 30,720 SF Date of Construction: 1988 082-213-10 Type of Construction: Wood-and Steel-Framed Current Tenants: None Site Assessment Performed By: Nasim Ahmed of Partner Site Assessment Conducted On: May 2, 2016 The subject property consists of one two-story building located on the southeast side of the property. The subject property building was vacated in 2015 and was most recently occupied by Bergstroms Store. In addition to the current building, the subject property is also improved with asphalt-paved parking area and associated landscaping. According to available historical sources, the subject property was either undeveloped or agricultural land from as early as 1896 until as late as 1953; developed for commercial use and occupied by a commercial structure from 1957 to 1988; and was redeveloped for commercial use and occupied by the current commercial structure from 1988 to the present. Tenants on the subject property have included Robert Shaw Controls Company (1958-1985) and (1988-2015). The immediately surrounding properties consist of Alro Way to the north followed by vacant land (former Fire Station at 1563 South Manchester Avenue); a building under construction (1614-1648 South Clementine Street) to the south; Interstate Freeway 5 to the east-northeast; and a construction storage yard (1600-1606 South Clementine Street) to the west. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page ii According to the Groundwater Monitoring Report for a Texaco Station site located approximately 1,500-feet to the southeast of the subject property and topographic map interpretation, the depth and direction of groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be present at approximately 73 feet below ground surface (bgs) and flow toward the southwest. Findings A recognized environmental condition (REC) refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Partner did not identify any recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A controlled recognized environmental condition (CREC) refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Partner did not identify any controlled recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A historical recognized environmental condition (HREC) refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Partner did not identify any historical recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: The subject property was historically used for agricultural purposes. There is a potential that agricultural related chemicals such as pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, may have been used and stored onsite. The subject property is either paved over or covered by building structures that minimize direct contact to any potential remaining concentrations in the soil. Additionally, during previous site development activities, near surface soils (where residual agricultural chemical concentrations would have most likely been present, if at all) were generally mixed with fill material or disturbed during grading. Also, it is common that engineered fill material is placed over underlying soils as part of the development activities. Furthermore, it is likely that residual Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page iii agricultural chemicals (if any) would have likely degraded since the site was last utilized for agricultural purposes. These additional variables serve to further reduce the potential for exposure to residual agricultural chemicals (if any). Based on these reasons, Partner concludes that the possible former use of agricultural chemicals is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. During the site reconnaissance, Partner observed evidence of historic water intrusion in the office and warehouse areas of the subject property. No suspect mold growth was noted; therefore, the observed water intrusion is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of 200 West Alro Way in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this practice are described in Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property; however, environmental issues were identified Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends the following: Partner recommends replacing water damaged building materials as part of routine maintenance to prevent the potential for future microbial proliferation. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page iv TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION .................................................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................................................ 1 1.2 Scope of Work ................................................................................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Limitations .......................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.4 User Reliance ..................................................................................................................................................................... 2 1.5 Limiting Conditions ......................................................................................................................................................... 3 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ............................................................................................................................... 4 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description ......................................................................................................................... 4 2.2 Current Property Use ...................................................................................................................................................... 4 2.3 Current Use of Adjacent Properties .......................................................................................................................... 4 2.4 Physical Setting Sources ................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.4.1 Topography .............................................................................................................................................................. 4 2.4.2 Hydrology ................................................................................................................................................................. 5 2.4.3 Geology/Soils .......................................................................................................................................................... 5 2.4.4 Flood Zone Information ...................................................................................................................................... 5 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION............................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review ............................................................................................................................................ 6 3.2 Fire Insurance Maps ........................................................................................................................................................ 8 3.3 City Directories .................................................................................................................................................................. 8 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps ...................................................................................................................................... 9 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW ..................................................................................................... 11 4.1 Regulatory Agencies .................................................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.1 Health Department ............................................................................................................................................ 11 4.1.2 Fire Department .................................................................................................................................................. 11 4.1.3 Air Pollution Control Agency .......................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.4 Regional Water Quality Agency .................................................................................................................... 11 4.1.5 Department of Toxic Substances Control ................................................................................................. 12 4.1.6 Building Department ......................................................................................................................................... 12 A copy of pertinent documents is included in Appendix B of this report ........................................................ 12 4.1.7 Planning Department ........................................................................................................................................ 13 4.1.8 Oil & Gas Exploration ........................................................................................................................................ 13 4.1.9 .................................................................................................................................................. 13 4.2 Mapped Database Records Search ........................................................................................................................ 13 4.2.1 Regulatory Database Summary ..................................................................................................................... 14 4.2.2 Subject Property Listings ................................................................................................................................. 14 4.2.3 Adjacent Property Listings .............................................................................................................................. 14 4.2.4 Sites of Concern Listings .................................................................................................................................. 15 4.2.5 Orphan Listings .................................................................................................................................................... 15 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS .................................................................... 16 5.1 Interviews ......................................................................................................................................................................... 16 5.1.1 Interview with Owner ........................................................................................................................................ 16 5.1.2 Interview with Report User .............................................................................................................................. 17 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page v 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager .................................................................................................................. 17 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants .................................................................... 17 5.1.5 Interview with Others ........................................................................................................................................ 17 5.2 User Provided Information ........................................................................................................................................ 17 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs ......................................................................................... 17 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge ..................................................................................................................................... 17 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User ....................................................................................................................... 17 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues ....................................................................................... 17 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information .......................................................... 17 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided Documentation ....................................................................... 18 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE .................................................................................................................... 19 6.1 General Site Characteristics....................................................................................................................................... 19 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards............................................................................................................................ 20 6.3 Non-ASTM Services...................................................................................................................................................... 21 6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) ..................................................................................................... 21 6.3.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) ..................................................................................................................................... 22 6.3.3 Radon ...................................................................................................................................................................... 23 6.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water ..................................................................................................................................... 23 6.3.5 Mold ......................................................................................................................................................................... 23 6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance ........................................................................................................................ 24 7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS........................................................................................................ 25 8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS ................................................................. 27 9.0 REFERENCES ........................................................................................................................................ 28 Figures Figure 1 Site Location Map Figure 2 Site Plan Figure 3 Topographic Map Appendices Appendix A Site Photographs Appendix B Historical/Regulatory Documentation Appendix C Regulatory Database Report Appendix D Qualifications Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (Partner) has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) in general conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Standard Practice E1527-13 and the Environmental Protection Agency Standards and Practices for All Appropriate Inquiries (AAI) (40 CFR Part 312) for the property located at 200 West Alro Way in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California (the . Any exceptions to, or deletions from, this scope of work are described in the report. 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this ESA is to identify existing or potential Recognized Environmental Conditions (as defined by ASTM Standard E1527-13) affecting the subject property that: 1) constitute or result in a material violation or a potential material violation of any applicable environmental law; 2) impose any material constraints on the operation of the subject property or require a material change in the use thereof; 3) require clean-up, remedial action or other response with respect to Hazardous Substances or Petroleum Products on or affecting the subject property under any applicable environmental law; 4) may affect the value of the subject property; and 5) may require specific actions to be performed with regard to such conditions and circumstances. The information contained in the ESA Report will be used by Client to: 1) evaluate its legal and financial liabilities for transactions related to foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing; 2) evaluate the subject ppotential, the associated market value and the impact of applicable laws that restrict financial and other types of assistance for the future development of the subject property; and/or 3) determine whether specific actions are required to be performed prior to the foreclosure, purchase, sale, loan origination, loan workout or seller financing of the subject property. This ESA was performed to permit the User to satisfy one of the requirements to qualify for the innocent landowner, contiguous property owner, or bona fide prospective purchaser limitations on scope of Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (CERCLA) (42 U.S.C. §9601) landowner liability protections LLPs -13 constitutes all appropriate inquiry into the previous ownership and uses of the property consistent with good 1.2 Scope of Work The scope of work for this ESA is in general accordance with the requirements of ASTM Standard E1527-13. This assessment included: 1) a property and adjacent site reconnaissance; 2) interviews with key personnel; 3) a review of historical sources; 4) a review of regulatory agency records; and 5) a review of a regulatory database report provided by a third-party vendor. Partner contacted local agencies, such as environmental health departments, fire departments and building departments in order to determine any current and/or former hazardous substances usage, storage and/or releases of hazardous substances on the subject property. Additionally, Partner researched information on the presence of activity and use limitations (AULs) at these agencies. As defined by ASTM E1527-13, AULs are the legal or physical restrictions or limitations on the use of, or access to, a site or facility: 1) to reduce or eliminate potential exposure to hazardous substances or petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the subject Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 2 property; or 2) to prevent activities that could interfere with the effectiveness of a response action, in order to ensure maintenance of a condition of no significant risk to public health or the environment. These legal or physical restrictions, which may include institutional and/or engineering controls (IC/ECs), are intended to prevent adverse impacts to individuals or populations that may be exposed to hazardous substances and petroleum products in the soil or groundwater on the property. If requested by Client, this report may also include the identification, discussion of, and/or limited sampling of asbestos-containing materials (ACMs), lead-based paint (LBP), mold, and/or radon. 1.3 Limitations Partner warrants that the findings and conclusions contained herein were accomplished in accordance with the methodologies set forth in the Scope of Work. These methodologies are described as representing good commercial and customary practice for conducting an ESA of a property for the purpose of identifying recognized environmental conditions. There is a possibility that even with the proper application of these methodologies there may exist on the subject property conditions that could not be identified within the scope of the assessment or which were not reasonably identifiable from the available information. Partner believes that the information obtained from the record review and the interviews concerning the subject property is reliable. However, Partner cannot and does not warrant or guarantee that the information provided by these other sources is accurate or complete. The conclusions and findings set forth in this report are strictly limited in time and scope to the date of the evaluations. The conclusions presented in the report are based solely on the services described therein, and not on scientific tasks or procedures beyond the scope of agreed-upon services or the time and budgeting restraints imposed by the Client. No other warranties are implied or expressed. Some of the information provided in this report is based upon personal interviews, and research of available documents, records, and maps held by the appropriate government and private agencies. This report is subject to the limitations of historical documentation, availability, and accuracy of pertinent records, and the personal recollections of those persons contacted. This practice does not address requirements of any state or local laws or of any federal laws other than the all appropriate inquiry provisions of the LLPs. Further, this report does not intend to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with the subject property. Environmental concerns, which are beyond the scope of a Phase I ESA as defined by ASTM include the following: ACMs, LBP, radon, and lead in drinking water. These issues may affect environmental risk at the subject property and may warrant discussion and/or assessment; however, are considered non-scope issues. If specifically requested by the Client, these non-scope issues are discussed in Section 6.3. 1.4 User Reliance Tarsadia Investments engaged Partner to perform this assessment in accordance with an agreement governing the nature, scope and purpose of the work as well as other matters critical to the engagement. All reports, both verbal and written, are for the sole use and benefit of Tarsadia Investments. Either verbally or in writing, third parties may come into possession of this report or all or part of the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 3 information generated as a result of this work. In the absence of a written agreement with Partner granting such rights, no third parties shall have rights of recourse or recovery whatsoever under any course of action against Partner, its officers, employees, vendors, successors or assigns. Any such unauthorized user shall be responsible to protect, indemnify and hold Partner, Client and their respective officers, employees, vendors, successors and assigns harmless from any and all claims, damages, losses, Unauthorized use of this report shall constitute acceptance of and commitment to these responsibilities, which shall be irrevocable and shall apply regardless of the cause of action or legal theory pled or asserted. Additional legal penalties may apply. This report has been completed under specific Terms and Conditions relating to scope, relying parties, limitations of liability, indemnification, dispute resolution, and other factors relevant to any reliance on this report. Any parties relying on this report do so having accepted the Terms and Conditions for which this report was completed. rd Terms and Conditions can be found at http://www.partneresi.com/terms-and-conditions.php 1.5 Limiting Conditions The findings and conclusions contain all of the limitations inherent in these methodologies that are referred to in ASTM E1527-13. Specific limitations and exceptions to this ESA are more specifically set forth below: Interviews with past or current owners, operators and occupants were not reasonably ascertainable and thus constitute a data gap. Based on information obtained from other historical sources (as discussed in Section 3.0), this data gap is not expected to alter the findings of this assessment. Partner requested information relative to deed restrictions and environmental liens, a title search, and completion of a pre-survey questionnaire from the Report User. This information was not provided at the time of the assessment. Partner submitted a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request to the Orange County Health Care Agency for information pertaining to hazardous substances, underground storage tanks, releases, inspection records, etc. for the subject property and/or adjacent properties. As of this writing, this agency has information obtained from other historical sources, this limitation is not expected to alter the overall findings of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 4 2.0 SITE DESCRIPTION 2.1 Site Location and Legal Description The subject property at 200 West Alro Way in Anaheim, California is located on the south side of Alro Way. According to the Orange County Assessor, the subject property is legally identified as APN 082-213-10. Please refer to Figure 1: Site Location Map, Figure 2: Site Plan, Figure 3: Topographic Map and Appendix A: Site Photographs for the location and site characteristics of the subject property. 2.2 Current Property Use The subject property consists of one two-story building located on the southeast side of the property. The subject property building was vacated in Store. In addition to the current building, the subject property is also improved with asphalt-paved parking area and associated landscaping. The subject property is designated for commercial development by the City of Anaheim. The subject property was not identified in the regulatory database report of Section 4.2. 2.3 Current Use of Adjacent Properties The subject property is located within a commercial area of Anaheim, California. During the vicinity reconnaissance, Partner observed the following land use on properties in the immediate vicinity of the subject property: Immediately Surrounding Properties North: Alro Way beyond which is a vacant land (former Fire Station at 1563 South Manchester Avenue) South: Under construction building (1614-1648 South Clementine Street) East: Interstate Freeway 5 West: Construction storage yard (1600-1606 South Clementine Street) The adjacent property to the north (1563 Manchester Avenue) was identified as a historic underground storage tank (HIST UST) site and the adjacent property to the south (1616 and 1638 South Clementine Street) was identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report of Section 4.2. 2.4 Physical Setting Sources 2.4.1 Topography The United States Geological Survey (USGS) Anaheim, California Quadrangle 7.5-minute series topographic map was reviewed for this ESA. According to the contour lines on the topographic map, the subject property is located at approximately 140 feet above mean sea level (MSL). The contour lines in the area of the subject property indicate the area is sloping gently toward the southwest. The subject property is depicted on the 1981 map as developed with a commercial structure. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 5 A copy of the most recent topographic map is included as Figure 3 of this report. 2.4.2 Hydrology The subject property is located in the Orange County Coastal Basin. The Orange County Coastal Basin has two main aquifer systems. The upper aquifer system has many small-perched aquifers that are overlain by relatively impermeable clay caps. These aquifers generally occur within 200 feet of the surface. The lower aquifer system is the largest of the aquifer systems and is separated from the upper aquifer system by a clay layer. Most of the utilized groundwater in Orange County originates from the lower aquifer system, which generally occurs at depths of 200-500 feet. According to the Groundwater Monitoring Report for a Texaco Station site located approximately 1,500-feet to the southeast of the subject property and topographic map interpretation, the depth and direction of groundwater in the vicinity of the subject property is inferred to be present at approximately 73 feet below ground surface (bgs) and flow toward the southwest. No settling ponds, lagoons, surface impoundments, wetlands or natural catch basins were observed at the subject property during this assessment. 2.4.3 Geology/Soils The subject property lies within the Orange County Coastal Plain area of the Los Angeles Basin. The plain consists of predominantly alluvial basin-fill material deposited by meandering tributaries of the Santa Ana River system. Surficial geology in the subject property vicinity consists of recent alluvium of gravel, sand, silty sand, and clayey silt with an average thickness of 200 feet. This recent alluvium is underlain by the upper Pleistocene Lakewood Formation, which averages 500 feet in thickness and consists of alternating stratigraphic zones of coarse-grained sand and clayey silt. The estimated depth to bedrock is more than 200 feet. Based on information obtained from the USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Web Soil Survey online database, the subject property is mapped as San Emigdio fine sandy loam. The San Emigdio component makes up 85 percent of the map unit. Slopes are zero to two percent. The parent material consists of alluvium derived from sedimentary rock. Depth to a root restrictive layer is greater than 60 inches. The natural drainage class is well drained. Water movement in the most restrictive layer is high. 2.4.4 Flood Zone Information Partner performed a review of the Flood Insurance Rate Map, published by the Federal Emergency Management Agency. According to Community Panel Number 141 (Map No. 06059C0141J), dated December 3, 2009, the subject property appears to be located in Zone X Shaded. Zone X Shaded is defined as areas of moderate flood hazard, usually the area between the limits of the 100-year and 500-year floods, or areas protected by levees from 100-year flood, or shallow flooding areas with average depths of less than one foot or drainage areas less than 1 square mile. A copy of the reviewed flood map is included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 6 3.0 HISTORICAL INFORMATION Partner obtained historical use information about the subject property from a variety of sources. A chronological listing of the historical data found is summarized in the table below: Historical Use Information Period/Date Source Description/Use 1896-1953 Aerial Photographs, Topographic Maps Undeveloped/Agricultural 1957-1988 Aerial Photographs, Topographic Maps, Building Records, City Directories Commercial 1988-Present Aerial Photographs, Building Records, City Directories, Interviews, Onsite Observations Commercial The subject property was historically used for agricultural purposes. There is a potential that agricultural related chemicals such as pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, may have been used and stored onsite. The subject property is either paved over or covered by building structures that minimize direct contact to any potential remaining concentrations in the soil. Additionally, during previous site development activities, near surface soils (where residual agricultural chemical concentrations would have most likely been present, if at all) were generally mixed with fill material or disturbed during grading. Also, it is common that engineered fill material is placed over underlying soils as part of the development activities. Furthermore, it is likely that residual agricultural chemicals (if any) would have likely degraded since the site was last utilized for agricultural purposes. These additional variables serve to further reduce the potential for exposure to residual agricultural chemicals (if any). Based on these reasons, Partner concludes that the possible former use of agricultural chemicals is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. No additional potential environmental concerns were identified in association with the current or former use of the subject property. 3.1 Aerial Photograph Review Partner obtained available aerial photographs of the subject property and surrounding area from Environmental Data Resources (EDR). The following observations were noted to be visible on the subject property and adjacent properties during the aerial photograph review: Date: 1938 Scale: Subject Property: Developed with orchards and farm structures North: Developed with orchards South: Developed with orchards East-Northeast: Developed with orchards and farm structures across a highway West: Developed with orchards Date: 1953 Scale: Subject Property: Developed with orchards North: No significant changes visible South: No significant changes visible Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 7 Date: 1953 Scale: East-Northeast: Developed with orchards and farm structures across Interstate Freeway 5 West: No significant changes visible Date: 1963 Scale: Subject Property: Developed with two commercial structures North: Developed with a commercial structure across Altro Way South: Vacant land East-Northeast: No significant changes visible West: Vacant land Date: 1972, 1977 Scale: Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: No significant changes visible South: No significant changes visible East-Northeast: Developed with commercial structures across Interstate Freeway 5 West: No significant changes visible Date: 1987 Scale: Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: Developed with a new commercial structure across Alro Way South: Developed with commercial structures East-Northeast: Developed with additional commercial structures across Interstate Freeway 5 West: Developed with commercial structures Date: 1990, 1995 Scale: Subject Property: Developed with current structure North: No significant changes visible South: No significant changes visible East-Northeast: No significant changes visible West: No significant changes visible Date: 2005, 2009, 2010, 2012 Scale: Subject Property: No significant changes visible North: Vacant land across Alro Way South: No significant changes visible East-Northeast: Vacant land across Interstate Freeway 5 West: No significant changes visible Copies of select aerial photographs are included in Appendix B of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 8 3.2 Fire Insurance MapsPartner reviewed the collection of Sanborn Fire insurance maps from EDR. Sanborn map coverage was not available for the subject property. A copy of the Sanborn Fire insurance No Coverage letter is included in Appendix B. 3.3 City Directories Partner reviewed historical city directories obtained from Sherman Library for past names and businesses that were listed for the subject property and adjacent properties. The findings are presented in the following table: City Directory Search for 200 W Alro Way (Subject Property) Year(s) Occupant Listed 1931, 1936, 1941, 1948, 1952, 1958, 1962, 1967, 1972, 1975, 1980, 1985 Not listed 1990, 1992, 1997, 2002, 2009 City Directory Search for 1601 South Manchester (Subject Property) Year(s) Occupant Listed 1931, 1936, 1941, 1948, 1953 Not listed 1958, 1962, 1967, 1972, 1975, 1980, 1985 Robert Shaw Controls Co. 1990, 1992, 1997, 2002, 2009 Not listed According to the city directory review, the subject property was occupied by Robert Shaw Controls . City Directory Search for Adjacent Properties Year(s) Occupant Listed 1931, 1936, 1941, 1948, 1953 Not listed (1563 Manchester Avenue) Not listed (1600-1648 Clementine Street) 1958 Anaheim City Fire Department (1563 Manchester Avenue) Not listed (1600-1648 Clementine Street) 1962, 1967, 1972, 1977 Not listed (1563 Manchester Avenue) Not listed (1600-1648 Clementine Street) 1980, 1985, 1990, 1992, 1997, 2002, 2009 Not listed (1563 Manchester Avenue) Multiple commercial listings (1600-1648 Clementine Street) Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 9 According to the city directory review, the adjacent properties have been occupied by commercial tenants since 1958. 3.4 Historical Topographic Maps Partner reviewed historical topographic maps obtained from NETR Online. The following observations were noted to be depicted on the subject property and adjacent properties during the topographic map review: Date: 1896, 1899 Subject Property: Undeveloped North: Undeveloped South: Undeveloped East-Northeast: Undeveloped across a paved road and railroad tracks West: Undeveloped Date: 1901, 1906, 1912, 1920, 1930, 1932, 1935, 1939, 1944, 1947 Subject Property: No significant changes depicted North: No significant changes depicted South: No significant changes depicted East-Northeast: Developed with small structures across a paved road and railroad tracks West: No significant changes depicted Date: 1950, 1956, 1961 Subject Property: Developed with orchards North: Developed with orchards South: Developed with orchards East-Northeast: Developed with orchards and small structures across Santa Ana Freeway West: Developed with orchards Date: 1967, 1972 Subject Property: Developed with one large and one small structures North: Developed with one small structure across Alro Way South: Vacant land East-Northeast: Developed with a small structure across Santa Ana Freeway West: Vacant land Date: 1981 Subject Property: No significant changes depicted North: No significant changes depicted South: No significant changes depicted Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 10 Date: 1981 East-Northeast: Developed with small structures across Santa Ana Freeway West: No significant changes depicted Due to copyright restrictions, copies of reviewed historical topographic maps are not included in this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 11 4.0 REGULATORY RECORDS REVIEW 4.1 Regulatory Agencies 4.1.1 Health Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Orange County Health Care Agency (OCHCA) Point of Contact: Administrative Assistant Agency Address: 1241 E Dyer Road, Santa Ana, California Agency Phone Number: (714) 433-6000 Date of Contact: April 18, 2016 Method of Communication: Faxed Request Summary of Communication: As of the date of this report, Partner has not received a response from the OCHCA for inclusion in this report. 4.1.2 Fire Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Anaheim Fire Department (AFD) Point of Contact: Administrative Assistant Agency Address: 201 South Anaheim Blvd, Anaheim, California Agency Phone Number: (714) 765-4000 Date of Contact: April 18, 2016 Method of Communication: Faxed Request Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage or releases, or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the AFD. 4.1.3 Air Pollution Control Agency Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Air Quality Management District (AQMD) Point of Contact: N/A Agency Address: 21865 Copley Drive, Diamond Bar, CA 91765 Agency Phone Number: (909) 396-3700 Date of Contact: April 29, 2016 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: No Permits to Operate (PTO), Notices of Violation (NOV), or Notices to Comply (NTC) or the presence of AULs, dry cleaning machines, or USTs were on file for the subject property with the AQMD. 4.1.4 Regional Water Quality Agency Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) Point of Contact: N/A Agency Address: 3737 Main Street, Riverside, California Agency Phone Number: (951) 782-4499 Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 12 Regulatory Agency Data Date of Contact: April 29, 2016 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage or releases, or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the RWQCB. 4.1.5 Department of Toxic Substances Control Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: California Department of Toxic Substances Control (DTSC) Point of Contact: N/A Agency Address: 5796 Corporate Avenue, Cypress, California Agency Phone Number: (714) 484-5300 Date of Contact: April 29, 2016 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: No records regarding hazardous substance use, storage or releases, or the presence of USTs and AULs on the subject property were on file with the DTSC. 4.1.6 Building Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Anaheim Building Department (ABD) Point of Contact: Administrative Assistant Agency Address: 200 South Anaheim Blvd, Anaheim, California Agency Phone Number: (714) 765-5153 Date of Contact: May 2, 2016 Method of Communication: In Person Summary of Communication: Records were available for review, as further discussed in the following table. Building Records Reviewed for 200 W Alro Way (Subject Property) Year(s) Owner/Applicant Description 1957 Robert Show & Fulton Controls Co. Permit to construct a control equipment research building 1985 Robertshaw Controls Co. Permit for re-roof 1988 Permit to demolish a 1500 SF free standing house and a 1200 SF Existing Building 1988 Bergstroms Child Store Permit to construct a 2-story building 1988 Bergstroms Child Store Permit to add retail to the existing building 1989 Bergstroms Child Store Certificate of occupancy for retail addition to warehouse A copy of pertinent documents is included in Appendix B of this report Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 13 4.1.7 Planning Department Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Anaheim Planning Department (APD) Point of Contact: Administrative Assistant Agency Address: 200 South Anaheim Blvd, Anaheim, California Agency Phone Number: (714) 765-5139 Date of Contact: May 2, 2016 Method of Communication: In Person Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the subject property is zoned Disney Resort Specific Plan by the City of Anaheim. 4.1.8 Oil & Gas Exploration Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: California Division of Oil, Gas and Geothermal Resources (DOGGR) Point of Contact: N/A Agency Address: 5816 Corporate Ave, Cypress, California Agency Phone Number: (714) 816-6847 Date of Contact: April 29, 2016 Method of Communication: Online Summary of Communication: According to DOGGR, no oil or gas wells are located on or adjacent to the subject property. 4.1.9 Regulatory Agency Data Name of Agency: Orange County Assessor (OCA) Point of Contact: Administrative Assistant Agency Address: Santa Ana, California Agency Phone Number: (714) 833-6000 Date of Contact: May 2, 2016 Method of Communication: In Person Summary of Communication: According to records reviewed, the subject property is identified by Assessor Parcel Number (APN) 082-213-10. The current building was constructed in 1988 and totals approximately 30,720 square feet on a 1.45-acre lot. 4.2 Mapped Database Records Search Information from standard federal, state, county, and city environmental record sources was provided by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. (EDR). Data from governmental agency lists are updated and integrated into one database, which is updated as these data are released. The information contained in this report was compiled from publicly available sources and the locations of the sites are plotted utilizing a geographic information system, which geocodes the site addresses. The accuracy of the geocoded locations is approximately +/-300 feet. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 14 Using the ASTM definition of migration, Partner considers the migration of hazardous substances or petroleum products in any form onto the subject property during the evaluation of each site listed on the radius report, which includes solid, liquid, and vapor. 4.2.1 Regulatory Database Summary Radius Report Data Database Search Radius (mile) Subject Property Adjacent Properties Sites of Concern Federal NPL or Delisted NPL Site 1.00 N N N Federal CERCLIS Site 0.50 N N N Federal CERCLIS-NFRAP Site 0.50 N N N Federal RCRA CORRACTS Facility 1.00 N N N Federal RCRA TSDF Facility 0.50 N N N Federal RCRA Generators Site (LQG, SQG, CESQG) 0.25 N N N Federal IC/EC Registries 0.50 N N/A N/A Federal ERNS Site Subject Property N N N State/Tribal Equivalent NPL 1.00 N N N State/Tribal Equivalent CERCLIS 1.00 N N N State/Tribal Landfill/Solid Waste Disposal Site 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Site 0.50 N Y N State/Tribal Registered Storage Tank Sites (UST/AST) 0.25 N N N SLIC 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Voluntary Cleanup Sites (VCP) 0.50 N N N State/Tribal Spills 0.50 N N N Federal Brownfield Sites 0.50 N N N State Brownfield Sites 0.50 N N N EDR MGP 1.00 N N N EDR US Hist Auto Station 0.125 N Y N EDR US Hist Cleaners 0.125 N N N 4.2.2 Subject Property Listings The subject property is not identified in the regulatory database report. 4.2.3 Adjacent Property Listings The adjacent property to the north was identified as a HIST UST (1563 Manchester Avenue) site and the adjacent property to the south was identified as an EDR Historical Auto Station site in the regulatory database report, as discussed below: The adjacent property, identified as Fire Station 3 at 1563 South Manchester Avenue, is located adjacent to the north of the subject property across Alro Way, and is situated hydrologically cross-gradient. According to the database report, Fire Station 3 formerly operated one 550-gallon diesel UST. No additional information was provided in the database report. No releases or Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 15 violations were noted in association with this listing. Therefore, based on the lack of a documented release and cross-gradient positioning with respect to groundwater flow, this listing is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern and it is unlikely that a regulatory agency file review would alter the overall findings of this assessment. The adjacent property, identified as outh Clementine Street, was formerly located adjacent to the south of the subject property, and situated hydrologically cross- to down-gradient. According to the database report, the south-adjoining property was op in 2006. No additional information was provided in the database report. No releases have been reported for this former adjacent occupant. Based on the lack of a documented release and cross- to down-gradient positioning with respect to groundwater flow, this listing is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern and it is unlikely that a regulatory agency file review would alter the overall findings of this assessment. The adjacent property, identified as Special Projects Motors Sports at 1638 South Clementine Street, was formerly located adjacent to the south of the subject property, and situated hydrologically cross- to down-gradient. According to the database report, the south-adjoining property was formerly occupied by Special Projects Motors Sports in 2004. No additional information was provided in the database report. No releases have been reported for this former adjacent occupant. Based on the lack of a documented release and cross- to down-gradient positioning with respect to groundwater flow, this listing is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern and it is unlikely that a regulatory agency file review would alter the overall findings of this assessment. Based on the findings, vapor migration is expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. 4.2.4 Sites of Concern Listings No sites of concern are identified in the regulatory database report. 4.2.5 Orphan Listings No orphan listings of concern are identified in the regulatory database report. A copy of the regulatory database report is included in Appendix C of this report. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 16 5.0 USER PROVIDED INFORMATION AND INTERVIEWS In order to qualify for one of the Landowner Liability Protections (LLPs) offered by the Small Business Liability Relief and Brownfields Revitalization Act of 2001 (the Brownfields Amendments), the User must conduct the following inquiries required by 40 CFR 312.25, 312.28, 312.29, 312.30, and 312.31. The User should provide the following information to the environmental professional. Failure to provide this information could result in a determination that all appropriate inquiries is not complete. The User is asked to provide information or knowledge of the following: Review Title and Judicial Records for Environmental Liens and AULs Specialized Knowledge or Experience of the User Actual Knowledge of the User Reason for Significantly Lower Purchase Price Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable information Degree of Obviousness Reason for Preparation of this Phase I ESA Fulfillment of these user responsibilities is key to qualification for the identified defenses to CERCLA liability. Partner requested our Client to provide information to satisfy User Responsibilities as identified in Section 6 of the ASTM guidance. Pursuant to ASTM E1527-13, Partner requested the following site information from Tarsadia Investments (User of this report). User Responsibilities Item Provided By User Not Provided By User Discussed Below Does Not Apply Environmental Pre-Survey Questionnaire X Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs X Specialized Knowledge X Actual Knowledge X Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues X Identification of Key Site Manager Section 5.1.3 Reason for Performing Phase I ESA Section 1.1 Prior Environmental Reports X Other X 5.1 Interviews 5.1.1 Interview with Owner The owner of the subject property was not available to be interviewed at the time of the assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 17 5.1.2 Interview with Report UserPlease refer to Section 5.2 below for information requested from the Report User. 5.1.3 Interview with Key Site Manager Mr. Hayden Socci, key site manager, indicated that he had no information pertaining to any pending, threatened, or past litigation relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property; any pending, threatened, or past administrative proceedings relevant to hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or from the subject property; or any notices from a governmental entity regarding any possible violation of environmental laws or possible liability relating to hazardous substances or petroleum products. 5.1.4 Interviews with Past Owners, Operators and Occupants Interviews with past owners, operators and occupants were not conducted since information regarding the potential for contamination at the subject property was obtained from other sources. 5.1.5 Interview with Others As the subject property is not an abandoned property as defined in ASTM 1527-13, interview with others were not performed. 5.2 User Provided Information 5.2.1 Title Records, Environmental Liens, and AULs Partner was not provided with title records or environmental lien and AUL information for review as part of this assessment. 5.2.2 Specialized Knowledge No specialized knowledge of environmental conditions associated with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. 5.2.3 Actual Knowledge of the User No actual knowledge of any environmental lien or AULs encumbering the subject property or in connection with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. 5.2.4 Valuation Reduction for Environmental Issues No knowledge of valuation reductions associated with the subject property was provided by the User at the time of the assessment. 5.2.5 Commonly Known or Reasonably Ascertainable Information The User did not provide information that is commonly known or reasonably ascertainable within the local community about the subject property at the time of the assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 18 5.2.6 Previous Reports and Other Provided DocumentationNo previous reports or other pertinent documentation was provided to Partner for review during the course of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 19 6.0 SITE RECONNAISSANCE The weather at the time of the site visit was sunny and clear. Refer to Section 1.5 for limitations encountered during the field reconnaissance and Sections 2.1 and 2.2 for subject property operations. The table below provides the site assessment details: Site Assessment Data Site Assessment Performed By: Nasim Ahmed Site Assessment Conducted On: May 2, 2016 The table below provides the subject property personnel interviewed during the field reconnaissance: Site Visit Personnel for 200 W Alro Way (Subject Property) Name Title/Role Contact Number Site Walk* Yes/No Hayden Socci Site Contact (714) 935-2379 Yes * Accompanied Partner during the field reconnaissance activities and provided information pertaining to the current operations and maintenance of the subject property. No potential environmental concerns were identified during the onsite reconnaissance. 6.1 General Site Characteristics 6.1.1 Solid Waste Disposal Solid waste generated at the subject property is disposed of in a commercial dumpster located on the subject property. An independent solid waste disposal contractor removes solid waste from the subject property. According to property personnel, only household trash is collected in the on-site solid waste dumpsters. No evidence of illegal dumping of solid waste was observed during the Partner site reconnaissance. 6.1.2 Sewage Discharge and Disposal Sanitary discharges on the subject property are directed into the municipal sanitary sewer system. The Anaheim Public Utilities Department services the subject property vicinity. No wastewater treatment facilities or septic systems are observed or reported on the subject property. 6.1.3 Surface Water Drainage Storm water is removed from the subject property primarily by sheet flow action across the paved surfaces towards storm water drains located throughout the subject property and in the public right of way. Site storm water from roofs, landscaped areas, and paved areas is directed to on-site concrete swales, which drain to the public right of way, and to on-site storm water drains. The subject property is connected to a municipal owned and maintained sewer system. The subject property does not appear to be a designated wetland area, based on information obtained from the United States Department of Agriculture; however, a comprehensive wetlands survey would be required in order to formally determine actual wetlands on the subject property. No surface Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 20 impoundments, wetlands, natural catch basins, settling ponds, or lagoons are located on the subject property. No drywells were identified on the subject property. 6.1.4 Source of Heating and Cooling Heating and cooling systems as well as domestic hot water equipment are fueled by electricity and natural gas provided by Anaheim Public Utilities and The Gas Company. The mechanical system is comprised of a HVAC units located on the roof of the building. 6.1.5 Wells and Cisterns No aboveground evidence of wells or cisterns was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.1.6 Wastewater Domestic wastewater generated at the subject property is disposed by means of the sanitary sewer system. No industrial process is currently performed at the subject property. 6.1.7 Septic Systems No septic systems were observed or reported on the subject property. 6.1.8 Additional Site Observations No additional general site characteristics were observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.2 Potential Environmental Hazards 6.2.1 Hazardous Substances and Petroleum Products Used or Stored at the Site No hazardous substances or petroleum products were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.2 Aboveground & Underground Hazardous Substance or Petroleum Product Storage Tanks (ASTs/USTs) No evidence of current or former ASTs or USTs was observed during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.3 Evidence of Releases No spills, stains or other indications that a surficial release has occurred at the subject property were observed. 6.2.4 Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) Older transformers and other electrical equipment could contain PCBs at a level that subjects them to regulation by the U.S. EPA. PCBs in electrical equipment are controlled by United States Environmental Protection Agency regulations 40 CFR, Part 761. Under the regulations, there are three categories into which electrical equipment can be classified: 1) Less than 50 parts per million (ppm) of PCBs Non-PCB; 2) 50 ppm-500 ppm PCB-Contaminated; and, 3) Greater than 500 ppm PCB-Containing. The manufacture, process, or distribution in commerce or use of any PCB in any manner other than in a totally enclosed manner was prohibited after January 1, 1977. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 21 The on-site reconnaissance addressed indoor and outdoor transformers that may contain PCBs. One pad-mounted transformer was observed on the subject property. The transformer is not labeled indicating PCB content. No staining or leakage was observed in the vicinity of the transformer. Partner contacted the Anaheim Public Utilities, who confirmed that Anaheim Public Utilities maintain ownership and operational responsibility for the transformer and that the unit does not contain PCBs. Based on the good condition of the equipment, the transformer is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. The subject property building is equipped with a hydraulic elevator. The hydraulic fluid contained within elevator system can potentially contain toxic PCBs. Based on the age of the building (post-1978), it is unlikely that the hydraulic fluid within the equipment contains PCBs. The equipment for the elevator is located on the 1st floor. No evidence of stains or leaks was observed at the base of the equipment during the site inspection. The elevator is reportedly maintained by Dove Elevator Company. Based on the good condition and regular maintenance of the elevator equipment, the elevator is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. No other potential PCB-containing equipment (interior transformers, oil-filled switches, hoists, lifts, dock levelers, hydraulic elevators, balers, etc.) was observed on the sureconnaissance. 6.2.5 Strong, Pungent or Noxious Odors No strong, pungent or noxious odors were evident during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.6 Pools of Liquid No pools of liquid were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.7 Drains, Sumps and Clarifiers No drains, sumps, or clarifiers, other than those associated with storm water removal, were observed on the subject property during the site reconnaissance. 6.2.8 Pits, Ponds and Lagoons No pits, ponds or lagoons were observed on the subject property. 6.2.9 Stressed Vegetation No stressed vegetation was observed on the subject property. 6.2.10 Additional Potential Environmental Hazards No additional environmental hazards, including landfill activities or radiological hazards, were observed. 6.3 Non-ASTM Services 6.3.1 Asbestos-Containing Materials (ACMs) Asbestos is the name given to a number of naturally occurring, fibrous silicate minerals mined for their useful properties such as thermal insulation, chemical and thermal stability, and high tensile strength. The Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 22 Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) regulation 29 CFR 1926.1101 requires certain construction materials to be presumed to contain asbestos, for purposes of this regulation. All thermal system insulation (TSI), surfacing material, and asphalt/vinyl flooring that are present in a building constructed prior to 1981 and have not been appropriately tested are presumed asbestos-containing material (PACM). The subject property building was constructed in 1988. As such, an asbestos evaluation was not required by the scope of services; however, please refer to the table below for observed materials that would be considered suspect ACMs in the event of a thorough survey: Suspect ACMs Suspect ACM Location Friable Yes/No Physical Condition Drywall Systems Throughout Building Interior No Good Floor Tiles Limited Areas in Building Interior No Good Floor Tile Mastic Limited Areas in Building Interior No Good Acoustical Ceiling Tiles Throughout Building Interior Yes Good Stucco Throughout Building Exterior No Good The limited visual survey consisted of noting observable materials (materials which were readily accessible and visible during the course of the site reconnaissance) that are commonly known to potentially contain asbestos. This activity was not designed to discover all sources of suspect ACM, PACM, or asbestos at the site; or to comply with any regulations and/or laws relative to planned disturbance of building materials such as renovation or demolition, or any other regulatory purpose. Rather, it is intended to give the User an indication if significant (significant due to quantity, accessibility, or condition) potential sources of ACM or PACM are present at the subject property. Additional sampling, assessment, and evaluation will be warranted for any other use. 6.3.2 Lead-Based Paint (LBP) Lead is a highly toxic metal that affects virtually every system of the body. LBP is defined as any paint, varnish, stain, or other applied coating that has 1 mg/cm2 (or 5,000 ug/g or 0.5% by weight) or more of lead. Congress passed the Residential Lead-Based Paint Hazard Reduction Act of 1992, also known as Title X , to protect families from exposure to lead from paint, dust, and soil. Under Section 1017 of Title X, intact LBP ,should be monitored and maintained to ensure that it does not become deteriorated. Further, Section 1018 of this law directed the Housing and Urban Development (HUD) and the US EPA to require the disclosure of known information on LBP and LBP hazards before the sale or lease of most housing built before 1978. Due to the commercial nature of use of the subject property, LBP was not considered within the scope of this assessment. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 23 6.3.3 RadonRadon is a colorless, odorless, naturally occurring, radioactive, inert, gaseous element formed by radioactive decay of radium (Ra) atoms. The US EPA has prepared a map to assist National, State, and local organizations to target their resources and to implement radon-resistant building codes. The map divides the country into three Radon Zones, according to the table below: EPA Radon Zones EPA Zones Average Predicted Radon Levels Potential Zone 1 Exceed 4.0 pCi/L Highest Zone 2 Between 2.0 and 4.0 pCi/L Moderate Zone 3 Less than 2.0 pCi/L Low It is important to note that the EPA has found homes with elevated levels of radon in all three zones, and the US EPA recommends site-specific testing in order to determine radon levels at a specific location. However, the map does give a valuable indication of the propensity of radon gas accumulation in structures. Radon sampling was not conducted as part of this assessment. Review of the US EPA Map of Radon Zones places the subject property in Zone 3. 6.3.4 Lead in Drinking Water According to available information, a public water system operated by the Anaheim Department of Public Utilities serves the subject property vicinity. The sources of public water for the City of Anaheim are surface water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California. According to the City of Anaheim and the 2014 Annual Water Quality Report, water supplied to the subject property is in compliance with all State and Federal regulations pertaining to drinking water standards, including lead and copper. Water sampling was not conducted to verify water quality. 6.3.5 Mold Molds are microscopic organisms found virtually everywhere, indoors and outdoors. Mold will grow and multiply under the right conditions, needing only sufficient moisture (e.g.in the form of very high humidity, condensation, or water from a leaking pipe, etc.) and organic material (e.g., ceiling tile, drywall, paper, or natural fiber carpet padding). Partner observed accessible, interior areas for the subject property building for significant evidence of mold growth with the exceptions detailed in Section 1.5 of this report; however, this ESA should not be used as a mold survey or inspection. Additionally, this limited assessment was not designed to assess all areas of potential mold growth that may be affected by mold growth on the subject property. Rather, it is intended to give the client an indication as to whether or not conspicuous (based on observed areas) mold growth is present at the subject property. This evaluation did not include a review of pipe chases, mechanical systems, or areas behind enclosed walls and ceilings. Partner observed evidence of historic water intrusion on in the office and warehouse areas that could lead to conditions to support mold growth. Mold occurs only when suitable conditions are present as a result Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 24 of unusual or sustained moisture. Moisture impacted materials should be removed and a moisture management plan should be implemented to minimize the recurrence of this issue after correction. 6.4 Adjacent Property Reconnaissance The adjacent property reconnaissance consisted of observing the adjacent properties from the subject property premises. No items of environmental concern were identified on the adjacent properties during the site assessment, including hazardous substances, petroleum products, ASTs, USTs, evidence of releases, PCBs, strong or noxious odors, pools of liquids, sumps or clarifiers, pits or lagoons, stressed vegetation, or any other potential environmental hazards. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 25 7.0 FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS Findings A REC refers to the presence or likely presence of any hazardous substances or petroleum products in, on, or at a property: due to release to the environment; under conditions indicative of a release to the environment; or under conditions that pose a material threat of a future release to the environment. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Partner did not identify any recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A CREC refers to a REC resulting from a past release of hazardous substances or petroleum products that has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority, with hazardous substances or petroleum products allowed to remain in place subject to the implementation of required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Partner did not identify any controlled recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. A HREC refers to a past release of any hazardous substances or petroleum products that has occurred in connection with the property and has been addressed to the satisfaction of the applicable regulatory authority or meeting unrestricted use criteria established by a regulatory authority, without subjecting the property to any required controls. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: Partner did not identify any historical recognized environmental conditions during the course of this assessment. An environmental issue refers to environmental concerns identified by Partner, which do not qualify as RECs; however, warrant further discussion. The following was identified during the course of this assessment: The subject property was historically used for agricultural purposes. There is a potential that agricultural related chemicals such as pesticides, herbicides, and fertilizers, may have been used and stored onsite. The subject property is either paved over or covered by building structures that minimize direct contact to any potential remaining concentrations in the soil. Additionally, during previous site development activities, near surface soils (where residual agricultural chemical concentrations would have most likely been present, if at all) were generally mixed with fill material or disturbed during grading. Also, it is common that engineered fill material is placed over underlying soils as part of the development activities. Furthermore, it is likely that residual agricultural chemicals (if any) would have likely degraded since the site was last utilized for agricultural purposes. These additional variables serve to further reduce the potential for exposure to residual agricultural chemicals (if any). Based on these reasons, Partner concludes that the possible former use of agricultural chemicals is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern at this time. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 26 During the site reconnaissance, Partner observed evidence of historic water intrusion in the office and warehouse areas of the subject property. No suspect mold growth was noted; therefore, the observed water intrusion is not expected to represent a significant environmental concern. Conclusions, Opinions and Recommendations Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment in conformance with the scope and limitations of ASTM Practice E1527-13 of 200 West Alro Way in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California Section 1.5 of this report. This assessment has revealed no evidence of recognized environmental conditions in connection with the subject property; however, environmental issues were identified. Based on the conclusions of this assessment, Partner recommends the following: Partner recommends replacing water damaged building materials as part of routine maintenance to prevent the potential for future microbial proliferation. Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 27 8.0 SIGNATURES OF ENVIRONMENTAL PROFESSIONALS Partner has performed a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment of the property located at 200 West Alro Way in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, California in general conformance with the scope and limitations of the protocol and the limitations stated earlier in this report. Exceptions to or deletions from this protocol are discussed earlier in this report. By signing below, Partner declares that, to the best of our professional knowledge and belief, we meet the definition of Environmental Professional as defined in §312.10 of 40 CFR §312. Partner has the specific qualifications based on education, training, and experience to assess a property of the nature, history, and setting of the subject property. Partner has developed and performed the all appropriate inquiries in conformance with the standards and practices set forth in 40 CFR Part 312. Prepared By: DRAFT Nasim Ahmed, REPA Environmental Professional Reviewed By: DRAFT Adam Bailey Project Manager Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Project No. 16-161656.1 May 5, 2016 Page 28 9.0 REFERENCES Reference Documents American Society for Testing and Materials, Standard Practice for Environmental Site Assessments: Phase I Environmental Site Assessment Process, ASTM Designation: E1527-13. Environmental Data Resources (EDR), Radius Report, May 2016. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Federal Insurance Administration, National Flood Insurance Program, Flood Insurance Map, accessed via internet, May 2016 United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, accessed via internet, May 2016. United States Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Web Soil Survey, accessed via the internet, May 2016. United States Environmental Protection Agency, EPA Map of Radon Zones (Document EPA-402-R-93-071), accessed via the internet, May 2016. United States Geological Survey, accessed via the Internet, May 2016. United States Geological Survey Topographic Map 1981, 7.5-minute series, accessed via internet, May 2016. FIGURES 1 SITE LOCATION MAP 2 SITE PLAN 3 TOPOGRAPHIC MAP FIGURE 1:SITE LOCATION MAPProject No.16-161656.1 Drawing Not To Scale FIGURE 2: SITE PLAN Project No. 16-161656.1 KEY: Subject Site GROUNDWATERFLOW VACANT LAND UNDER CONSTRUCTION BUILDING (1614-1648 S Clementine St) VACANT LAND FIGURE 3:TOPOGRAPHIC MAPProject No.16-161656.1 USGS 7.5 Minute Anaheim, California Quadrangle Created: 196/Revised: 1981 APPENDIX A: SITE PHOTOGRAPHS APPENDIX A:SITE PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 1. View of the subject property 2. View of commercial building 3. View of commercial building 4. View of commercial building 5. View of parking 6. View of parking APPENDIX A:SITE PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 7. View of office 8. View of office 9. View of office 10. View of showroom 11. View of showroom 12. View of showroom APPENDIX A:SITE PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 13. View of warehouse 14. View of warehouse 15. View of warehouse 16. View of water intrusion 17. View of water intrusion 18. View of elevator equipment APPENDIX A:SITE PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 19. View of loading dock 20. View of transformer 21. View of vacant land to the north 22. View of under construction building to the south 23. View of Interstate Freeway 5 to the east-northeast 24. View of construction storage yard to the west APPENDIX B: HISTORICAL/REGULATORY DOCUMENTATION APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1938 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1953 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1963 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1972 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1977 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1987 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1990 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 1995 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 2005 APPENDIX B:AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHSProject No.16-161656.1 Date of Photograph: 2012 Inquiry Number: Commercial Property200 West Alro WayAnaheim, CA 92802 April 29, 2016 4606344.3 Results: Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark otice EDR and its logos (including Sanborn and Sanborn Map) are trademarks of Environmental Data Resources, Inc. or its affiliates. All other trademarks used hereinare the property of their respective owners. page The Sanborn Library includes more than 1.2 millionfire insurance maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris &Browne, Hopkins, Barlow and others which trackhistorical property usage in approximately 12,000American cities and towns. Collections searched: Library of CongressUniversity Publications of America EDR Private Collection Limited Permission To Make Copies Sanborn® Library search results 04/29/16 Commercial Property Partner Engineering and Science, Inc.200 West Alro Way 2154 Torrance Blvd, Suite 200Anaheim, CA 92802 Torrance, CA 90501-00004606344.3 Marisol Garcia The Sanborn Library has been searched by EDR and maps covering the target property location as provided by Partner Engineering andScience, Inc. were identified for the years listed below. The Sanborn Library is the largest, most complete collection of fire insurance maps.The collection includes maps from Sanborn, Bromley, Perris & Browne, Hopkins, Barlow, and others. Only Environmental Data ResourcesInc. (EDR) is authorized to grant rights for commercial reproduction of maps by the Sanborn Library LLC, the copyright holder for thecollection. Results can be authenticated by visiting www.edrnet.com/sanborn. The Sanborn Library is continually enhanced with newly identified map archives. This report accesses all maps in the collection as of theday this report was generated. 5AC0-4A15-B92CNA16-161656.1 UNMAPPED PROPERTYThis report certifies that the complete holdings of the Sanborn Library,LLC collection have been searched based on client supplied targetproperty information, and fire insurance maps covering the target propertywere not found. Certification #: 5AC0-4A15-B92C Partner Engineering and Science, Inc. (the client) is permitted to make up to FIVE photocopies of this Sanborn Map transmittal and each fire insurance mapaccompanying this report solely for the limited use of its customer. No one other than the client is authorized to make copies. Upon request made directly to an EDRAccount Executive, the client may be permitted to make a limited number of additional photocopies. This permission is conditioned upon compliance by the client, itscustomer and their agents with EDR's copyright policy; a copy of which is available upon request. This Report contains certain information obtained from a variety of public and other sources reasonably available to Environmental Data Resources, Inc. It cannotbe concluded from this Report that coverage information for the target and surrounding properties does not exist from other sources. NO WARRANTYEXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLYDISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION, MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USEOR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALL ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE,WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE, ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING,WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL, CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTALDATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLY LIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. Purchaser accepts this Report "AS IS". Anyanalyses, estimates, ratings, environmental risk levels or risk codes provided in this Report are provided for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended toprovide, nor should they be interpreted as providing any facts regarding, or prediction or forecast of, any environmental risk for any property. Only a Phase IEnvironmental Site Assessment performed by an environmental professional can provide information regarding the environmental risk for any property.Additionally, the information provided in this Report is not to be construed as legal advice. Copyright 2016 by Environmental Data Resources, Inc. All rights reserved. Reproduction in any media or format, in whole or in part, of any report or map ofEnvironmental Data Resources, Inc., or its affiliates, is prohibited without prior written permission. 4606344 3 2 APPENDIX C: REGULATORY DATABASE REPORT ®kcehCoeGhtiwtropeR™paMsuidaRRDEehT Commercial Property SECTION PAGE Executive Summary ES1Overview Map 2Detail Map 3Map Findings Summary 4Map Findings 8Orphan Summary 161Government Records Searched/Data Currency Tracking GR-1 GEOCHECK ADDENDUM Physical Setting Source Addendum A-1Physical Setting Source Summary A-2Physical Setting SSURGO Soil Map A-6Physical Setting Source Map A-11Physical Setting Source Map Findings A-13Physical Setting Source Records Searched PSGR-1 Thank you for your business. Disclaimer - Copyright and Trademark Notice NO WARRANTY EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED, IS MADE WHATSOEVER IN CONNECTION WITH THIS REPORT. ENVIRONMENTALDATA RESOURCES, INC. SPECIFICALLY DISCLAIMS THE MAKING OF ANY SUCH WARRANTIES, INCLUDING WITHOUT LIMITATION,MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR USE OR PURPOSE. ALL RISK IS ASSUMED BY THE USER. IN NO EVENT SHALLENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. BE LIABLE TO ANYONE, WHETHER ARISING OUT OF ERRORS OR OMISSIONS, NEGLIGENCE,ACCIDENT OR ANY OTHER CAUSE, FOR ANY LOSS OF DAMAGE, INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, SPECIAL, INCIDENTAL,CONSEQUENTIAL, OR EXEMPLARY DAMAGES. ANY LIABILITY ON THE PART OF ENVIRONMENTAL DATA RESOURCES, INC. IS STRICTLYLIMITED TO A REFUND OF THE AMOUNT PAID FOR THIS REPORT. TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY INFORMATION ADDRESS COORDINATES 33.8082550 - 33˚ 48’ 29.71’’117.9089320 - 117˚ 54’ 32.15’’ USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP ASSOCIATED WITH TARGET PROPERTY AERIAL PHOTOGRAPHY IN THIS REPORT EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TARGET PROPERTY SEARCH RESULTS DATABASES WITH NO MAPPED SITES STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list Federal Delisted NPL site list Federal CERCLIS list Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Federal RCRA generators list Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries Federal ERNS list EXECUTIVE SUMMARY State- and tribal - equivalent NPL State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists State and tribal leaking storage tank lists State and tribal registered storage tank lists State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites Local Land Records Records of Emergency Release Reports EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Other Ascertainable Records EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives SURROUNDING SITES: SEARCH RESULTS bold italics STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation CORCORAN MFG CO INC 1745 S HASTER ST SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.) 18 34 Federal RCRA generators list PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ODETICS INC 1515 MANCHESTER AVE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.135 mi.) 7 11 DNR INDUSTRIES 1562 S ANAHEIM BLVD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) C10 17 VEGAS TRANSMISSIONS 1558 S ANAHEIM BLVD E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) C11 20 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 1550 S ANAHEIM BLVD, E 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) C12 21 CAL DEPT OF TRANSPOR 1628 S ANAHEIM BLVD ESE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.179 mi.) 13 24 CORCORAN MFG CO INC 1745 S HASTER ST SE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.231 mi.) 18 34 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation SATELLITE CLEANERS I 1730 S CLEMENTIME ST SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) E17 31 State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation REVERE SCHOOL EXPANS 126/132/138/144/150/ N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.401 mi.) K43 128 1400 126/132/138/144/150 N 1/4 - 1/2 (0.401 mi.) K44 131 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT T 1000 E KATELLA ST ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.786 mi.) 55 151 JAYCOX DISPOSAL 1016 KATELLA ESE 1/2 - 1 (0.818 mi.) 56 155 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation State and tribal leaking storage tank lists PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation WONDRIES TOYOTA OF A 1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) D14 26 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF A 1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) D15 28 STEINER CORP 1755 HASTER ST SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.253 mi.) F21 37 ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE 1460 S ANAHEIM BOULE NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.271 mi.) G22 41 ANIK STOP 1460 ANAHEIM NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.271 mi.) G23 43 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL 1730 S ANAHEIM BLVD SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.272 mi.) F24 44 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY RYDER TRUCK RENTAL 1730 S ANAHEIM BLVD SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.272 mi.) F25 47 JOHN PIERRE APPAREL 251 PALAIS NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.) 45 133 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 1730 SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.477 mi.) 50 142 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation EAGLE CAR WASH 350 W KATELLA AVE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.350 mi.) 29 54 KATELLA CAR WASH (FO 350 KATELLA AVE SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.365 mi.) 30 57 TEXACO SERVICE STATI 100 KATELLA AVE S 1/4 - 1/2 (0.367 mi.) I33 61 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISNEYLAND TOMORROWL 1313 S HARBOR BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.) J37 67 DISNEYLAND 1313 S HARBOR BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.) J41 80 DISNEYLAND RESORT 1313 S HARBOR BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.) J42 91 AVIS RENT - A - CAR 1400 HARBOR NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.) L48 139 AVIS RENT A CAR 1400 S HARBOR BLVD NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.) L49 140 MOBIL OIL 1800 S HARBOR SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.498 mi.) M53 146 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation SATELLITE CLEANERS ( 1730 SOUTH CLEMENTIN SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) E16 31 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY DISNEYLAND RESORT 1313 S HARBOR BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.) J42 91 State and tribal registered storage tank lists PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation State and tribal Brownfields sites PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation SATELLITE CLEANERS ( 1730 SOUTH CLEMENTIN SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) E16 31 ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ODETICS INC 1515 MANCHESTER AVE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.135 mi.) 7 11 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF A 1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) D15 28 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION 1580 S CLEMENTINE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) 20 36 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ODETICS INC 1515 MANCHESTER AVE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.135 mi.) 7 11 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF A 1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) D15 28 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation ODETICS INC 1515 MANCHESTER AVE NNW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.135 mi.) 7 11 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF A 1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) D15 28 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION 1580 S CLEMENTINE N 1/8 - 1/4 (0.249 mi.) 20 36 Other Ascertainable Records PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation SATELLITE CLEANERS I 1730 S CLEMENTIME ST SSW 1/8 - 1/4 (0.230 mi.) E17 31 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation WONDRIES TOYOTA OF A 1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD NE 1/8 - 1/4 (0.226 mi.) D15 28 STEINER CORP 1755 HASTER ST SSE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.253 mi.) F21 37 ANIK STOP 1460 ANAHEIM NE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.271 mi.) G23 43 JOHN PIERRE APPAREL 251 PALAIS NNE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.434 mi.) 45 133 EXXON SERVICE STATIO 1730 SE 1/4 - 1/2 (0.477 mi.) 50 142 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation KATELLA CAR WASH (FO 350 KATELLA AVE SSW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.365 mi.) 30 57 DISNEYLAND RESORT 1313 S HARBOR BLVD WNW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.385 mi.) J42 91 AVIS RENT - A - CAR 1400 HARBOR NW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.469 mi.) L48 139 PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation MOBIL OIL CORP. 18-1 1800 SOUTH HARBOR SW 1/4 - 1/2 (0.498 mi.) M54 148 EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Equal/Higher Elevation PageMap IDDirection / Distance Address Lower Elevation EXECUTIVE SUMMARY EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 6 0 k V N a t u r a l G a s EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list Federal Delisted NPL site list Federal CERCLIS list Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Federal RCRA generators list Federal institutional controls /engineering controls registries Federal ERNS list State- and tribal - equivalent NPL State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS State and tribal landfill and/orsolid waste disposal site lists State and tribal leaking storage tank lists MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY State and tribal registered storage tank lists State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites State and tribal Brownfields sites ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Local Lists of Landfill / SolidWaste Disposal Sites Local Lists of Hazardous waste /Contaminated Sites Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks Local Land Records Records of Emergency Release Reports MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY Other Ascertainable Records MAP FINDINGS SUMMARY EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives 303 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster A 0.057 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:141 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WSW 1616 S CLEMENTINE ST N/AA1EDR Hist Auto 1015255853 367 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster A 0.070 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:141 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW 1638 S CLEMENTINE ST N/AA2EDR Hist Auto 1015258930 564 ft.0.107 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:144 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNW 1563 SOUTH MANCHESTER AVENUE N/A3HIST USTFIRE STATION 3 U001578747 613 ft.0.116 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:146 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE 353 W CERRITOS AVE N/A4EDR Hist Auto 1015444898 643 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster B 0.122 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:140 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSW 1680 CLEMENTINE ST N/AB5LUSTANAHEIM FIRE STATION #3, FRMER S103943459 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION #3, FRMER (Continued)S103943459 643 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster B 0.122 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:140 ft. < 1/8 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSW 1680 S CLEMENTINE ST N/AB6LUSTANAHEIM FIRE STATION #3, FRMER S109284655 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION #3, FRMER (Continued)S109284655 ECHOEMI711 ft.FINDS0.135 mi.CA FID UST Relative:Higher Actual:144 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST USTANAHEIM, CA 92802NNW SWEEPS UST1515 MANCHESTER AVE CAD9808933907RCRA-SQGODETICS INC 1000411520 ODETICS INC (Continued)1000411520 ODETICS INC (Continued)1000411520 ODETICS INC (Continued)1000411520 ODETICS INC (Continued)1000411520 ODETICS INC (Continued)1000411520 927 ft.0.176 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:139 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSW 1713 S CLEMENTINE ST # 55 N/A8USTANAHEIM RESORT PUMP HOUSE #55 U003937563 943 ft. Site 1 of 4 in cluster C 0.179 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 East 1562 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/AC9USTLEAVERTON COMPANY U003778733 943 ft. Site 2 of 4 in cluster C 0.179 mi.ECHO Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92805East FINDS1562 S ANAHEIM BLVD STE B CAR000019091C10RCRA-SQGDNR INDUSTRIES 1001195343 DNR INDUSTRIES (Continued)1001195343 DNR INDUSTRIES (Continued)1001195343 DNR INDUSTRIES (Continued)1001195343 944 ft. Site 3 of 4 in cluster C 0.179 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/8-1/4 ECHOANAHEIM, CA 92805East FINDS1558 S ANAHEIM BLVD CAD983584129C11RCRA-SQGVEGAS TRANSMISSIONS 1000594571 VEGAS TRANSMISSIONS (Continued)1000594571 945 ft. Site 4 of 4 in cluster C 0.179 mi.ECHO Relative:Higher Actual:147 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92805East FINDS1550 S ANAHEIM BLVD, SUITE A CAT000619031C12RCRA-SQGSHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO 1000371809 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO (Continued)1000371809 SHERWIN-WILLIAMS CO (Continued)1000371809 947 ft.0.179 mi.ECHO Relative:Higher Actual:158 ft. 1/8-1/4 HAZNETANAHEIM, CA 92805ESE FINDS1628 S ANAHEIM BLVD CAR00001956213RCRA-SQGCAL DEPT OF TRANSPORTAION 1001195387 CAL DEPT OF TRANSPORTAION (Continued)1001195387 CAL DEPT OF TRANSPORTAION (Continued)1001195387 1195 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster D 0.226 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NE Orange Co. Industrial Site1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/AD14LUSTWONDRIES TOYOTA OF ANAHEIM 1000240276 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF ANAHEIM (Continued)1000240276 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF ANAHEIM (Continued)1000240276 1195 ft.HIST CORTESESite 2 of 3 in cluster D0.226 mi.CA FID UST Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/8-1/4 HIST USTANAHEIM, CA 92805NE SWEEPS UST1601 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/AD15LUSTWONDRIES TOYOTA OF ANAHEIM S101589312 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF ANAHEIM (Continued)S101589312 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF ANAHEIM (Continued)S101589312 WONDRIES TOYOTA OF ANAHEIM (Continued)S101589312 Open - Site AssessmentFacility Status: 1214 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster E 0.230 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSW BROWNFIELDS1730 SOUTH CLEMENTINE STREET N/AE16SLICSATELLITE CLEANERS (FORMER)S117227941 1214 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster E 0.230 mi.ECHO Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/8-1/4 DRYCLEANERSANAHEIM, CA 92802SSW FINDS1730 S CLEMENTIME ST CAR000010298E17RCRA-SQGSATELLITE CLEANERS INC 1001085705 SATELLITE CLEANERS INC (Continued)1001085705 SATELLITE CLEANERS INC (Continued)1001085705 :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: 1222 ft.0.231 mi.ECHO Relative:Higher Actual:146 ft. 1/8-1/4 FINDSANAHEIM, CA 92803SE RCRA-SQG1745 S HASTER ST CAD00826614018SEMS-ARCHIVECORCORAN MFG CO INC 1000180227 CORCORAN MFG CO INC (Continued)1000180227 CORCORAN MFG CO INC (Continued)1000180227 1247 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster D 0.236 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NE 1500 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/AD19USTSAV-ON OSCO DRUGS U003879910 1313 ft.0.249 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:146 ft. 1/8-1/4 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 North CA FID UST1580 S CLEMENTINE N/A20SWEEPS USTANAHEIM FIRE STATION #3 S101589502 ANAHEIM FIRE STATION #3 (Continued)S101589502 1336 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster F 0.253 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:143 ft. 1/4-1/2 HIST CORTESEANAHEIM, CA 92805SSE EMI1755 HASTER ST N/AF21LUSTSTEINER CORP S102438098 STEINER CORP (Continued)S102438098 STEINER CORP (Continued)S102438098 STEINER CORP (Continued)S102438098 STEINER CORP (Continued)S102438098 1432 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster G 0.271 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NE HIST UST1460 S ANAHEIM BOULEVARD N/AG22LUSTADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE U001578714 ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)U001578714 ADVANCED AUTOMOTIVE (Continued)U001578714 1432 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster G 0.271 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NE HIST CORTESE1460 ANAHEIM N/AG23LUSTANIK STOP S102424019 ANIK STOP (Continued)S102424019 1437 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster F 0.272 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:144 ft. 1/4-1/2 CA FID USTANAHEIM, CA 92805SE SWEEPS UST1730 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/AF24LUSTRYDER TRUCK RENTAL S101589159 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL (Continued)S101589159 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL (Continued)S101589159 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL (Continued)S101589159 1437 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster F 0.272 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:144 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SE Orange Co. Industrial Site1730 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/AF25LUSTRYDER TRUCK RENTAL S109284698 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL (Continued)S109284698 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL (Continued)S109284698 RYDER TRUCK RENTAL (Continued)S109284698 1545 ft.0.293 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE 1459 S ANAHEIM BLVD N/A26SWRCYSANCHEZ RECYCLING INC S107869743 1695 ft.0.321 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:137 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 South 221 KATELLA AVE., W. N/A27LUSTHERTZ RENT-A-CAR S106109197 HERTZ RENT-A-CAR (Continued)S106109197 HERTZ RENT-A-CAR (Continued)S106109197 1706 ft.0.323 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:148 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE 1440 S ANAHEIM BLVD STE I-60 N/A28SWRCYB J RECYCLING S110656452 B J RECYCLING (Continued)S110656452 1847 ft.0.350 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:137 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTANAHEIM, CA 92802South UST350 W KATELLA AVE N/A29LUSTEAGLE CAR WASH U003785392 EAGLE CAR WASH (Continued)U003785392 EAGLE CAR WASH (Continued)U003785392 1927 ft.0.365 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:136 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSW HIST CORTESE350 KATELLA AVE N/A30LUSTKATELLA CAR WASH (FORMER)S101307712 KATELLA CAR WASH (FORMER) (Continued)S101307712 1933 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster H 0.366 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:140 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSE 100 KATELLA AVE N/AH31LUSTMEDDOCK MOBIL S104233746 MEDDOCK MOBIL (Continued)S104233746 1937 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster I 0.367 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 South 100 W KATELLA AVE N/AI32LUSTTEXACO SERVICE STATION S100946356 TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued)S100946356 TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued)S100946356 1937 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster I 0.367 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 South CHMIRS100 KATELLA AVE N/AI33LUSTTEXACO SERVICE STATION S101299282 Not reportedDate Completed: TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued)S101299282 TEXACO SERVICE STATION (Continued)S101299282 1982 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster H 0.375 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:140 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SSE 100 E KATELLA AVE N/AH34LUSTMEDDOCK MOBIL S103619612 MEDDOCK MOBIL (Continued)S103619612 MEDDOCK MOBIL (Continued)S103619612 2033 ft. Site 1 of 8 in cluster J 0.385 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92803 WNW 1313 S. HARBOR BOULEVARD, #1481 E-SERVICE AREA N/AJ35ENVIROSTORSPECTRUM PHOTOGRAPHIC & IMAGING S110494322 SPECTRUM PHOTOGRAPHIC & IMAGING (Continued)S110494322 2033 ft. Site 2 of 8 in cluster J 0.385 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW 1313 HARBOR BLVD N/AJ36LUSTDISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST.S100933981 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S100933981 2033 ft. Site 3 of 8 in cluster J 0.385 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 NPDESANAHEIM, CA 92802WNW Orange Co. Industrial Site1313 S HARBOR BLVD N/AJ37LUSTDISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST.S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 DISNEYLAND TOMORROWLAND RR ST. (Continued)S103950105 2033 ft. Site 4 of 8 in cluster J 0.385 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW 1313 W HARBOR BLVD. N/AJ38LUSTDISNEYLAND - ROUNDHOUSE S109284918 DISNEYLAND - ROUNDHOUSE (Continued)S109284918 DISNEYLAND - ROUNDHOUSE (Continued)S109284918 2033 ft. Site 5 of 8 in cluster J 0.385 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92803 WNW 1313 S. HARBOR BOULEVARD MARS BLDG N/AJ39ENVIROSTORSPECTRUM PHOTOGRAPHIC & IMAGING - HARBOR S110494321 SPECTRUM PHOTOGRAPHIC & IMAGING - HARBOR (Continued)S110494321 2033 ft. Site 6 of 8 in cluster J 0.385 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 WNW 1313 HARBOR BLVD N/AJ40LUSTDISNEYLAND-AUTOPIA S104405118 DISNEYLAND-AUTOPIA (Continued)S104405118 2033 ft.EMISite 7 of 8 in cluster J0.385 mi.CHMIRS Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTANAHEIM, CA 92802WNW UST1313 S HARBOR BLVD N/AJ41LUSTDISNEYLANDU003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 Not reportedDate Completed: DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 DISNEYLAND (Continued)U003713747 WDSNPDESHIST CORTESEEMICHMIRS2033 ft.CA FID USTSite 8 of 8 in cluster J0.385 mi.HIST UST Relative:Lower Actual:138 ft. 1/4-1/2 SLICANAHEIM, CA 92802WNW LUST1313 S HARBOR BLVD CAD027828250J42RCRA-LQGDISNEYLAND RESORT 1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 Completed - Case ClosedFacility Status: DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 Not reportedDate Completed: DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 DISNEYLAND RESORT (Continued)1000314740 2116 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster K 0.401 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:147 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 North SCH126/132/138/144/150/WEST GUINIDA LANE N/AK43ENVIROSTORREVERE SCHOOL EXPANSION S105628714 REVERE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued)S105628714 REVERE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued)S105628714 REVERE SCHOOL EXPANSION (Continued)S105628714 2116 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster K 0.401 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:147 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 North SCH126/132/138/144/150 WEST GUINIDA LANE N/AK44ENVIROSTOR1400S107735765 1400 (Continued)S107735765 1400 (Continued)S107735765 2289 ft.0.434 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:152 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 NNE HIST CORTESE251 PALAIS N/A45LUSTJOHN PIERRE APPAREL S102431957 JOHN PIERRE APPAREL (Continued)S102431957 JOHN PIERRE APPAREL (Continued)S102431957 2360 ft.0.447 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:161 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 SE 950 ANAHEIM BLVD N/A46LUSTCANO’S S101299241 CANO’S (Continued)S101299241 2459 ft.0.466 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:133 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW 1779 HARBOR N/A47LUSTUNOCALS105774300 UNOCAL (Continued)S105774300 2474 ft. Site 1 of 2 in cluster L 0.469 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:141 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 NW HIST CORTESE1400 HARBOR N/AL48LUSTAVIS RENT - A - CAR SYSTE S103463896 AVIS RENT - A - CAR SYSTE (Continued)S103463896 2474 ft. Site 2 of 2 in cluster L 0.469 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:141 ft. 1/4-1/2 SWEEPS USTANAHEIM, CA 92802NW UST1400 S HARBOR BLVD N/AL49LUSTAVIS RENT A CAR U001578596 AVIS RENT A CAR (Continued)U001578596 AVIS RENT A CAR (Continued)U001578596 2516 ft.0.477 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:163 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92801 SE HIST CORTESE1730 N/A50LUSTEXXON SERVICE STATION #14 S104756863 EXXON SERVICE STATION #14 (Continued)S104756863 2556 ft.0.484 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:153 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92805 ENE 611 EAST CERRITOS AVENUE N/A51ENVIROSTORSILGAN PLASTICS CORPORATION S106797612 2629 ft. Site 1 of 3 in cluster M 0.498 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:132 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW 1800 HARBOR BLVD N/AM52LUSTMOBIL #18-106 S103248970 MOBIL #18-106 (Continued)S103248970 2629 ft. Site 2 of 3 in cluster M 0.498 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:132 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 92802 SW HIST UST1800 S HARBOR N/AM53LUSTMOBIL OIL U001578614 MOBIL OIL (Continued)U001578614 MOBIL OIL (Continued)U001578614 Not reportedDate Completed: 2629 ft. Site 3 of 3 in cluster M 0.498 mi. Relative:Lower Actual:132 ft. 1/4-1/2 ANAHEIM, CA 90680 SW Notify 651800 SOUTH HARBOR N/AM54CHMIRSMOBIL OIL CORP. 18-106 S100179564 MOBIL OIL CORP. 18-106 (Continued)S100179564 Not reportedDate Completed: MOBIL OIL CORP. 18-106 (Continued)S100179564 MOBIL OIL CORP. 18-106 (Continued)S100179564 :Following information was gathered from the prior CERCLIS update completed in 10/2013: 4152 ft.ECHO0.786 mi.FINDS Relative:Higher Actual:147 ft. 1/2-1 ENVIROSTORANAHEIM, CA 92805ESE RCRA-SQG1000 E KATELLA ST CAD04990327155SEMS-ARCHIVEORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING 1000315096 ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING (Continued)1000315096 ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING (Continued)1000315096 ORANGE EMPIRE HEAT TREATING (Continued)1000315096 4320 ft.0.818 mi. Relative:Higher Actual:147 ft. 1/2-1 SCHANAHEIM, CA 92803ESE LUST1016 KATELLA N/A56ENVIROSTORJAYCOX DISPOSAL S109548352 JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)S109548352 JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)S109548352 JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)S109548352 JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)S109548352 JAYCOX DISPOSAL (Continued)S109548352 Number of Days to Update: STANDARD ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Federal NPL site list GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal Delisted NPL site list Federal CERCLIS list Federal CERCLIS NFRAP site list GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal RCRA CORRACTS facilities list Federal RCRA non-CORRACTS TSD facilities list Federal RCRA generators list GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal institutional controls / engineering controls registries GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Federal ERNS list State- and tribal - equivalent NPL State- and tribal - equivalent CERCLIS State and tribal landfill and/or solid waste disposal site lists State and tribal leaking storage tank lists GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal registered storage tank lists GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal voluntary cleanup sites GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING State and tribal Brownfields sites ADDITIONAL ENVIRONMENTAL RECORDS Local Brownfield lists Local Lists of Landfill / Solid Waste Disposal Sites GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Hazardous waste / Contaminated Sites GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Lists of Registered Storage Tanks GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Local Land Records GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Records of Emergency Release Reports GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING Other Ascertainable Records GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR HIGH RISK HISTORICAL RECORDS EDR Exclusive Records GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING EDR RECOVERED GOVERNMENT ARCHIVES Exclusive Recovered Govt. Archives COUNTY RECORDS GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING OTHER DATABASE(S) GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING STREET AND ADDRESS INFORMATION GOVERNMENT RECORDS SEARCHED / DATA CURRENCY TRACKING USGS TOPOGRAPHIC MAP 117.908932 - 117˚ 54’ 32.16’’33.808255 - 33˚ 48’ 29.72’’ TARGET PROPERTY COORDINATES TARGET PROPERTY ADDRESS GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE ADDENDUM SURROUNDING TOPOGRAPHY: ELEVATION PROFILES Target Property Elevation: 143 ft. North South West East 1 2 7 1 2 8 1 3 0 1 3 2 1 3 7 1 3 6 1 3 7 1 3 8 1 4 0 1 4 3 1 4 6 1 4 6 1 4 6 1 4 8 1 4 9 1 5 2 1 5 3 1 5 4 1 5 5 1 2 9 1 3 0 1 3 1 1 3 3 1 3 5 1 3 6 1 3 8 1 4 1 1 4 2 1 4 3 1 5 3 1 4 8 1 4 9 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 5 2 1 5 5 1 5 7 1 5 8 TARGET PROPERTY TOPOGRAPHY TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION GROUNDWATER FLOW DIRECTION INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY AQUIFLOW * ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All Site-Specific Hydrogeological Data*: * ©1996 Site−specific hydrogeological data gathered by CERCLIS Alerts, Inc., Bainbridge Island, WA. All rights reserved. All HYDROGEOLOGIC INFORMATION NATIONAL WETLAND INVENTORY FEMA FLOOD ZONE HYDROLOGIC INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY ROCK STRATIGRAPHIC UNIT GEOLOGIC AGE IDENTIFICATION GEOLOGIC INFORMATION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GROUNDWATER FLOW VELOCITY INFORMATION GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc.EDR Inc. 2 4 4 1 3 2 0 1/16 1/8 1/4 Miles Soil Map ID: 2 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturatedhydraulicconductivitymicro m/secLayer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction(pH) Soil Map ID: 1 DOMINANT SOIL COMPOSITION IN GENERAL AREA OF TARGET PROPERTY GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY Soil Map ID: 3 Soil Layer Information Boundary Classification Saturatedhydraulicconductivitymicro m/secLayer Upper Lower Soil Texture Class AASHTO Group Unified Soil Soil Reaction(pH) GEOCHECK - PHYSICAL SETTING SOURCE SUMMARY