RES-2017-018RESOLUTION NO. 2017-018
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH
(GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2015-00503)
(DEV2014-00124)
(1700 South Lewis Street)
WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the
confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR -57 Freeway") freeways in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west
of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR -57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison
easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel
Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional
Transportation Intermodal Center (ARTIC), and surrounding residential and mixed use
development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels,
restaurants, and retail development; and
WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has
approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel
Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No.
120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of
urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500 -room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000 -square -foot
exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development and 15,570 on-site parking spaces.
The Grove of Anaheim, the renovated Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building
were developed/renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area
Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as
those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to
the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part
of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental
Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development
within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay
Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the
provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports,
entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including
increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a
net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new
office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space.
1
Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena
Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide
General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the
General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and
Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed -Use, Office -High, Office -Low, Industrial, Open
Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use,
residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall
maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175
dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses,
industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional
development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the
existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan
No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed -Use land use designation. Final
Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development
intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including
that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum
Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools
necessary to realize the City's new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced
the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE
Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"),
approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved
associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners
desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter
into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of
Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in
conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420,
Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which
collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum
Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square
feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved
two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle
intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square
feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental hnpact Report was also approved to increase
the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total
2
allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units,
5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the
General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized
Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable
development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847
square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet
of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of
Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General
Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code
Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the
implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City
Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including
FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General
Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the
PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development
intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential
units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and
1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning
reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No.
V), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5
Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162
of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality
Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact
report had occurred; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 18, 2012 (addendum
No. 2), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with amendments to the
General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case
No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107")
to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial
3
development allowed within the "Mixed -Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and
to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No.
3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a
master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13 -acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as
1005-1105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units
from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council
adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of
dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan
Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on
November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for
commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet,
resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU
Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum
number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical
errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No.
6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance
No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses
within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for
commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the
maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No.
4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a
master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1 -acre (approximate) property commonly known as
1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000
and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the
"A -Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend
the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor
commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on
Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from
33 acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the "A -Town" Project located at State
College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 5 to FSEIR No. 339, dated May 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"),
was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a
master planned mixed-use project on real property consisting of 17.5 acres (approximate)
bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the north, and Artisan
Court on the south to permit a development consisting of approximately 1,079 residential
dwelling units inclusive of 12 live/work units, approximately, but not to exceed, 9,800 square
feet of commercial uses, a public park, and a network of local streets (the "Jefferson at Stadium
Park Project"). On June 14, 2016, 2016, the City Council approved and adopted Addendum No.
5 and approved the entitlements requested for the Jefferson at Stadium Park Project, consisting
of General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, Tentative
Parcel Map No. 2015-174 and Development Agreement No. 2015-00002. Thereafter, by the
adoption of Ordinance No. 6373 on June 14, 2016, 2016, the City Council adopted Development
E
Agreement No. 2015-00002 to provide for the development of the Jefferson at Stadium Park
Project and certain vested development rights in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 6 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2016 ("Addendum No.
6"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a
master planned mixed-use project on a 14.8 -acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as 2040
South State College Boulevard to permit a development consisting of a mixed-use project
consisting of 405 residential units, 433,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 200 -room hotel,
and 77,000 square feet of office space (the "LT Platinum Project"). On October 25, 2016, the
City Council approved and adopted Addendum No. 6 and approved the entitlements requested
for the LT Platinum Project, consisting of General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00504,
Miscellaneous Case No. No. 2016-00631, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2015-00128,
Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05806, Tentative Tract Map No. 17918, and Development
Agreement No. 2015-00001. By its approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00504, the
City Council revised Table LU -4 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to modify the
density provisions for properties within the Platinum Triangle area that were then designated for
mixed-use land use, consisting of a reduction of the maximum number of dwelling units from
19,027 to 17,348 units, an increase in the maximum square feet of commercial space from
4,735,111 to 4,782,243, and a reduction of the maximum amount of office space from 9,652,747
to 9,180,747 square feet. The approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00504 also
operated to modify the Land Use Plan (Figure LU -4), Existing and Planned Bicycle Facilities
(Figure C-5) and Green Plan (Figure G-5) of the Anaheim General Plan to remove the
designation of a public park on the property to be developed with the LT Platinum Project.
Thereafter, by the adoption of Ordinances Nos. 6386 and 6387 on October 25, 2016, the City
Council adopted Zoning Code Amendment No. 2015-00128 to be consistent with General Plan
Amendment No. 201-00504 and Development Agreement No. 2015-00001 to provide for the
development of the LT Platinum Project and certain vested development rights in connection
therewith; and
WHEREAS, Trumark Homes, LLC, a California limited liability company (the
"Developer") has requested a series of actions to permit the construction of 153 single-family,
attached condominium units (the "Project") for that certain real property commonly known as
1700 South Lewis Street in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
generally depicted and described in Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property"). To that end, the Developer has requested the following entitlements:
1. An amendment to the General Plan to designate the Property from the Office -Low
land use designation to the Mixed -Use land use designation and to increase the total amount of
residential development permitted in the Platinum Triangle Mixed -Use land use designation to
17,501 dwelling units and decrease the total amount of office development permitted in the
Platinum Triangle Office -High and Office -Low land use designations to 4,309,486 ("General
Plan Amendment No. 2015-00503");
2. Development Agreement No. 2016-00004, in the form presented at the meeting at
which this Resolution was adopted, in order to provide for the development of the Project and
certain vested development rights in connection therewith;
5
3. A Zoning Code Amendment to amend Chapter 18.20 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
to reflect the addition of the "Lewis" Mixed Use Overlay Zone District and associated
development standards ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2015-00127");
4. An amendment to the PTMLUP to amend the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use
Plan to create the "Lewis" Mixed Use Overlay Zone District and reflect the change in
development intensity described above ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2016-00636");
5. A Conditional Use Permit to permit a 153 -unit attached single-family residential
project with modified setbacks between buildings ("Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05877');
6. Tentative Tract Map No. 17994 to subdivide the Project Site and create a 31 -lot, 153 -
unit residential subdivision for condominium purposes, and which will also establish the
alignment and configuration of internal private streets; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00503, Development Agreement No.
2016-00004, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2015-00127, Miscellaneous Case No. 2016-00636,
Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-05877, and Tentative Tract Map No. 17994 shall be referred to
herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 7.8 acres in size and is located in the "I"
Industrial Zone. The Property is also located within the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU)
Overlay Zone, meaning that the regulations contained in Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle
Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") apply to the
Property. The Property is designated on the Land Use Element of the General Plan for "Office -
Low" land uses; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
"CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of
environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with
CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the
physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration
was circulated for a 20 -day public/responsible agency review on December 1, 2016 and was also
made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the
Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building
Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 S. Anaheim Blvd.,
Anaheim, California. Copies of said document are also available for purchase; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic
Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on January 6, 2017, at 5:00 p.m.,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with
the provisions of the Code, considered the Mitigated Negative Declaration; heard and considered
2
evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and investigated and made
findings and recommendations in connection with the Planning Commission's adoption of its
Resolution No. PC2017-003; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of its Resolution No. 2017-003 and pursuant to the
provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure
Manual, the Planning Commission has found and determined and has recommended that the City
Council so find and determine the following:
1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with
the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure
Manual and, together with MMP No. 339, serves as the appropriate environmental
documentation for the Proposed Project;
2. That it has carefully reviewed and considered the information contained in the
Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during
the public review period) prior to acting upon the Proposed Project; and
3. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments
received), the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment
with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMP No. 339 and that the
Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the City
Council.
WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered
at said hearing relating to the Proposed Project, including the Mitigated Negative Declaration
including MMP No. 339, the Planning Commission adopted Resolution No.PC2017-004
recommending that the City Council approve and adopt General Plan Amendment No. 2015-
00503 in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution is adopted and incorporated
herein by this reference, contingent upon and subject to the adoption by the City Council of (1) a
resolution approving Tentative Tract Map No. 17994; (2) a resolution amending the Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan by approving and adopting Miscellaneous Case No. 2016-00636,
(3) an ordinance amending the Zoning Code by approving and adopting Zoning Code
Amendment No. 2015-00127, (4) a resolution approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2016-
05877, and (5) an ordinance approving and adopting Development Agreement No. 2016-00004;
and
WHEREAS, upon receipt of the Planning Commission's Resolutions Nos. PC2017-003,
PC2017-004, PC2017-005, PC2017-006, PC2017-007, PC2017-008, PC2017-009, a summary of
evidence and a report of the findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the
City Council did fix the 7th day of February, 2017, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in
the Civic Center, as the place, for a public hearing on the Proposed Project and for the purpose of
considering evidence for and against the Mitigated Negative Declaration, MMP No. 339 and the
Proposed Project, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as provided by law; and
7
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00503 proposes to amend the Anaheim
General Plan as follows:
1. Land Use Element
• Amend "Figure LU -4: Land Use Plan" of the Land Use Element of the General
Plan to reflect the change from the Office -Low designation to the Mixed -Use
designation as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
• Amend "Table LU -4, General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the
City", to modify the density provisions for properties within the Platinum Triangle
area that are designated for mixed-use land use, to increase the maximum number
of dwelling units from 17,348 to 17,501 units; and, to reduce the amount of office
development permitted in the Platinum Triangle Office -High and Office -Low
land use designations to 4,309,486, as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
WHEREAS, the City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study
made by itself, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does hereby find and determine as follows:
1. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00503 maintains
internal consistency with the General Plan. The proposed modifications to the
Land Use Element of the General Plan are consistent with Goals 5.1 and 15.1 of
the Land Use Element to create and enhance dynamic, identifiable places for the
benefit of Anaheim residents, employees and visitors, and to continue to establish
The Platinum Triangle as a thriving economic center that provides residents,
visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and
entertainment opportunities that are accessed by arterial highways, transit systems
and pedestrian promenades, which is consistent with the goals and policies set
forth in the General Plan for the Mixed Use land use designation and the Platinum
Triangle Master Land Use Plan, as proposed to be amended by, and contingent
upon and subject to the approval by the City Council of, Miscellaneous Case No.
2016-00636, now pending;
2. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00503 would not be
detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the
City because the proposed single-family residential development is consistent
with the goals and policies of the Land Use Element of the General Plan
encouraging mixed-use and commercial development that provides safe, protected
places for pedestrians to walk, attractive surroundings, opportunities for social
interaction, and comfortable places to sit and relax;
3. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00503 continues to
be consistent with the intent of the General Plan and would maintain the balance
of land uses within the City; and
E:j
4. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-00503 is physically
suitable to accommodate the proposed modifications, including but not limited to,
access, physical constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility
with surrounding land uses.
WHEREAS, the City Council determines that the evidence in the record constitutes
substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that
the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including
testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report and all materials
in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from
the findings made in this Resolution. The City Council expressly declares that it considered all
evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented
to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations and based upon a thorough review of proposed General Plan Amendment 2015-
00503, the Mitigated Negative Declaration including MMP No. 339, and the evidence received
to date, does hereby approve General Plan Amendment 2015-00503, as shown on Exhibits B and
C attached to this Resolution, contingent upon and subject to (1) the approval of the other
proposed entitlements, specifically, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2015-00127, Miscellaneous
Case No. 2016-00636, Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05877, Tentative Tract Map No. 17994
and Development Agreement No. 2016-00004, now pending; and (2) the mitigation measures set
forth in Mitigation Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and
Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 339 for the Proposed New Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council does hereby find and determine that
adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each and all of the
conditions set forth in a separate resolution of this City Council adopted substantially
concurrently with this Resolution relating to proposed Development Agreement No. 2016-00004.
Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final
judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein
contained, shall be deemed null and void.
2
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim this 7thday of February_, 2017, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Vanderbilt and Council Members Murray,
Barnes, Moreno, Kring, and Faessel
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: Mayor Tait
ATTEST:
n' I
T 013CAd49V --
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY O ANAHEIM
120661 v5/LHM
10
CITY OF ANAHEIM
MA OR OF TH CITY OF ANAHEIM
EXHIBIT "A"
DEV NO. 2014-00124
APN: 082-261-22
E HOWELL AVE
6 15'
918'
Cl)
3
LU
E•MASON•LN 606'
co
CD
L6
z
O
Z>
E -
w
m
e
5"
'00 Source: Recorded Tract Maps and/or City GIS.
Feet
Please note the accuracy is +/- two to five feet.
EXHIBIT "B"
FIGURE LU -4: LAND USE PLAN
OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
EXHIBIT "C"
TABLE LU -4,
GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY
TABLE LU -4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR
SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY
Location
General Plan Land Use Designations
Permitted Density
The Mountain
Low Medium Hillside Density
485
Park Area
Residential
(Up to 6 du/ac)
2,015
Low Medium Density Residential
(Up to 2,500 dwelling units)
(Up to 16 du/ac)
Area "A"
(Parcel Map
Low -Medium Density Residential
Up to 140 dwelling units
94-205)
The Disneyland
Resort Specific
Plan (SP 92-1)
Commercial Recreation
See Note No. 1 on next page.
Area
The Anaheim
Resort®
Specific Plan
Commercial Recreation
See Note No. 2 on next page.
SP 92-2 Area
Hotel Circle
Commercial Recreation
The Hotel Circle Specific Plan allows for a
Specific Plan
master planned hotel project including up to
(SP 93-1) Area
969 hotel rooms and integrated guest
oriented amenities including full-service
restaurants, conference room/banquet
facilities, pool and spa areas, tour bus/shuttle
facilities, and pedestrian promenades and
plaza areas with comprehensive
landscaping.
The Platinum
Mixed -Use
Triangle Area
Residential
17,348 17,501 dwelling units
Commercial
4,782,243 square feet
Office
9,180,747 square feet
Institutional
1,500,000 square feet
Office High and Office Low
4;4356 4,309,486 square feet*
Institutional
3.0 FAR
Industrial
0.5 FAR
Open Space
0.1 FAR
The maximum FAR for properties designated Office -
Low is 0.5; the maximum FAR for properties
designated Office -High is 2.0.
The Stonegate Low Density Residential Up to 35 dwelling units
Development
Area
TABLE LU -4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY (CONTINUED)
Note No. 1: The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an approximate 489.7
acre international multi -day vacation designation resort including ongoing modifications to the
Disneyland theme park, the development of a new theme park, additional hotels and entertainment
areas, administrative office facilities, new public and private parking facilities, and an internal
transportation system. This development is within five planning Districts (Theme Park, Hotel, Parking,
Future Expansion and District A) and a C-R Overlay, which allows development within the Overlay to
either be consistent with the underlying Resort District or subject to the same land uses as in the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also identifies
maximum development density designations for hotel/motel development in the Hotel District (up to
5,600 hotel rooms for the entire District with up to 1,000 hotel rooms transferable to the Theme Park
District), in District A (the maximum number of units permitted would be 75 hotel/motel rooms per gross
acre or 75 hotel/motel rooms per parcel existing on June 29, 1993, whichever is greater) and the C-R
Overlay (the maximum number of units permitted on a parcel would be the following: 1) for parcels
designated Low Density — up to 50 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; and 2)
for parcels designated Medium Density — up to 75 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is
greater; provided that for those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceeded the
maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of The Disneyland
Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density.) It should be noted
that accessory uses may be developed as well as other visitor -serving commercial/retail and restaurant
uses along with these hotel/motel uses. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also provides for the
development of the Anaheim GardenWalk project pursuant to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay at the
following density and subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended, to permit
the following: up to 590,265 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses,
including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and
278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800 parking spaces. The
Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay encompasses District A and the portion of the Parking District (East
Parking Area)/CR Overlay south of Disney Way.
TABLE LU -4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY (CONTINUED)
Note No. 2: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) provides for the development of approximately 581.3 acres
within The Anaheim Resort. The ARSP is divided into two development areas. Development Area No. 1 is referred
to as the C-R (Commercial Recreation) District which allows for hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities,
as well as restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities. Development Area No. 2 is referred to as the PR
(Public Recreation) District which encompasses the Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities
and provides for the orderly use of City -owned property as well as the existing Anaheim Hilton Hotel.
The C-R District includes two overlays. The Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay, which encompasses existing
mobilehome parks within the C-R District, provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations
and procedures to mitigate relocation concerns and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners
when a park is converted to another land use. The Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay, which applies to focused
areas of the Specific Plan, provides for the incorporation of residential uses into hotel developments when such
uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300 -room full-service hotel.
The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan also identifies maximum development density designations in the C-R District.
These designations are based upon hotel/motel development and allow up to 20% of each hotel/motel project gross
square footage, excluding parking facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main
hotel/motel complex) accessory uses. These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted
hotel/motel density at the rate of one hotel/motel room per six hundred (600) gross square feet of accessory use.
For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels/motels
with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the
otherwise permitted hotel/motel (including accessory uses) density as determined by the City Traffic and
Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval. The maximum development density for each
of the designations are as follows:
• Low Density: up to 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater;
• Low -Medium Density: up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater;
• Low -Medium Density (Modified): up to 252 rooms and 75,593 square feet of accessory uses;
• Medium Density: up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; and,
• Convention Center (CC) Medium Density: up to 125 rooms per gross acre with trip generation
characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel,
whichever is greater.
For those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation, the
number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or
modified at their existing density. For projects that are developed in accordance with the Anaheim Resort
Residential Overlay, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed shall be less than the number of hotel rooms
proposed and such projects shall not create infrastructure impacts greater than the subject property's permitted
hotel/motel density, as permitted by the property's underlying C-R District density designation unless otherwise
mitigated through subsequent environmental analysis.
The maximum development density for the PR District is up to:
• 2,158,363 square feet of convention center/meeting space
• 100,000 square feet of outdoor programmable space
• 2,500 hotel rooms
• 180,000 square feet of commercials ace
CLERK'S CERTIFICATE
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LINDA ANDAL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the
original Resolution No. 2017-018 adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim
City Council held on the 7th day of February, 2017, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: Mayor Pro Tem Vanderbilt and Council Members Murray, Barnes, Moreno,
Kring, and Faessel
NOES: None
ABSTAIN: Mayor Tait
ABSENT: None
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 10th day of February, 2017.
(SEAL)